RSS
Aside from his genuine passion for the environment, Monbiot’s position on every major issue chimes precisely with that of his employer, the Guardian. He is not his own man. He’s owned
Guardian columnist George Monbiot is, by his own admission, a very busy man. Dedicated as he is to issues such as soil loss, he has yet to find the time to throw his weight behind the campaign to free Julian Assange.
When thousands of supporters poured into London from all over the world at the weekend to besiege the British Parliament, creating a human chain around it, Monbiot, like his newspaper the Guardian, ignored the event.
The media mainly lie about Julian Assange’s case by ommitting information, helping to disappear him from public view. They did that this weekend by ignoring the many thousands who turned out to besiege Parliament with a human chain.
It was a figment of my imagination apparently pic.twitter.com/0QNDbf6kdf
— Jonathan Cook (@Jonathan_K_Cook) October 10, 2022
Assange, the founder of Wikileaks, has been rotting in a UK high-security prison for years, as the United States works through a series of lawfare strategies to extradite him and lock him up indefinitely in a maximum-security jail on the other side of the Atlantic.
Assange’s crime is doing real journalism: he published incontrovertible evidence of US and British war crimes in places like Afghanistan and Iraq. That kind of journalism has now been reclassified by Washington as espionage and treason, even though Assange is not a US citizen and did none of the work in the US. Plots by the CIA to murder and kidnap Assange have also come to light.
Should his oppressors succeed, a very clear message will be sent to other journalists around the globe that the US is ready to come after them too if they disclose its crimes. The chilling effect on investigative journalism is already palpable.
So, you might imagine, even a journalist like Monbiot – one primarily concerned about soil loss and other environmental concerns – should be worried by Assange’s fate. In the circumstances he might consider it worth publicising this threat to the most fundamental of our freedoms: the ability to know what our governments are up to and hold them to account.
Extraordinary that the Guardian's George Monbiot hurriedly deletes a rare tweet in defence of Julian Assange and then justifies the move by claiming he has been unable to make time to follow the details of the UK's jailing of a fellow journalist and leading political dissident https://t.co/WSwaEkfPb1
— Jonathan Cook (@Jonathan_K_Cook) September 12, 2019
After all, Monbiot’s columns exposing the threats to our soil will be all the poorer if investigative journalism of the kind Assange excelled in before his silencing continues to be snuffed out by the US and UK’s joint terror campaign on whistleblowers and those who offer them a secure platform. How will we ever know what is being done behind our backs by governments and major corporations, or how they are keeping us in the dark about their political and environmental crimes and misdeeds, if fighters for transparency like Assange can simply be disappeared?
But Monbiot is apparently not persuaded. He is yet to find the space or time for a column on this, the biggest threat to media freedom in our lifetime.
When the Guardian columnist did take a week off from writing about soil loss and related topics, Assange’s plight, sadly, was still considered of insufficient import. As I have noted before, Monbiot decided it was more important to fill his empty slot in the paper’s commentary pages with denunciations of journalists like John Pilger for failing to be vocal enough in condemning Russia for invading Ukraine.
Monbiot has never written a column on the worst assault on press freedom in a generation: the political persecution of Julian Assange. Soil erosion, he said, took precedence. Now he's prioritised a witchhunt of left heretics on Ukraine over Assange's freedom. He's an utter fraud pic.twitter.com/OtJ7pTE6gx
— Jonathan Cook (@Jonathan_K_Cook) March 2, 2022
Monbiot, it seems, felt he had to prioritise defending journalism from the menace posed by independent journalists on the left over any threat posed by the combined force of the US and British national-security states.
But maybe the issue for Monbiot really is, as he has openly worried before, that he does not have anything sufficiently interesting to add to the topic because Assange’s persecution is already being detailed so fully by … a handful of independent journalists – those like John Pilger he wishes to bully into silence.
Monbiot apparently does not need to dedicate a column to Assange, one that might alert millions of Guardian readers to the continuing persecution of a western journalist and the related assault on journalism, because independent leftwing writers – ones being algorithmed into oblivion by social media platforms – are covering the issue already.
Breaking the rulebook
Those unsure whether Monbiot is arguing in good faith – and whether, aside from matters that touch directly on his environmental brief, he actually represents anything that can be seriously called “the left” – might consider his latest astounding tweet. He issued this one at the weekend, presumably adding so much to the burden of work that he could not find time to express his support for the human chain trying desperately to draw attention to the endless procedural and legal abuses at the heart the Assange case.
Nonetheless, we should celebrate the fact that Monbiot took time from his busy environmental schedule to watch the first of The Labour Files, Al Jazeera’s explosive four-part documentary. The programmes draw on a huge cache of leaked internal Labour party files that show how the party’s rightwing bureaucracy broke Labour’s own rulebook – as well as the law – to surveil, smear, bully and expel members that were seen as leftwing or supporters of Corbyn. Current leader Sir Keir Starmer appears to be colluding with, if not directing, this horror show.
These Labour officials – who have been regularly termed “whistleblowers” by Monbiot’s employer, the Guardian – worked secretly to sabotage the 2017 election, including by helping to weaponise antisemitism to ensure Corbyn was unelectable, while at the same time demonstrating what looks suspiciously like a deep-seated racism in the treatment of black and Muslim party members, often because the BAME community were seen as stalwart allies of Corbyn, given his long-time activism against racism.
So how did Monbiot respond to his belated exposure to the Labour Files? He tweeted:
I’ve just watched Al Jazeera’s The Labour Files: The Crisis, about the handling of anti-semitism allegations. I found it deeply shocking. But I’m very unsure of myself on this issue. Have there been any rebuttals? Is there substantive evidence countering its claims? Thank you.
I've just watched Al Jazeera's The Labour Files: The Crisis, about the handling of anti-semitism allegations. I found it deeply shocking.
But I'm very unsure of myself on this issue. Have there been any rebuttals? Is there substantive evidence countering its claims?
Thank you.— George Monbiot (@GeorgeMonbiot) October 7, 2022
Very unsure of himself? What surprising modesty and reticence from a journalist more usually ready with an opinion on a diverse range of topics – many concerning issues where he appears not to have read further than the headlines of his paper, the Guardian. Maybe it is too churlish to remember this 2011 Monbiot tweet on Assange, one that has fared badly with the passing of time:
Why does Assange still have so much uncritical support? Seems to me he’s acting like a tinpot dictator
Why does Assange still have so much uncritical support? Seems to me he's acting like a tinpot dictator. #wikileaks http://t.co/GMAJfCq
— George Monbiot (@GeorgeMonbiot) September 2, 2011
Or how about his sudden and unexpected expertise in tripartite extradition law, between the US, Britain and Sweden? In 2012, he confidently observed:
Harder to extrad[ite] him [Assange] from Sweden than UK, as US wld then have to go through 2 jurisdictions, not one.
@RedKarateka Harder to extrad him from Sweden than UK, as US wld then have to go through 2 jurisdictions, not one. http://t.co/PMbpN64T …
— George Monbiot (@GeorgeMonbiot) August 22, 2012
In fact, as people who know a lot more than Monbiot about such matters pointed out at the time, this was nonsense. Nils Melzer, an international law professor and the former United Nations expert on torture, recently wrote a book that set out good reasons why his lawyers would have assessed he was likely to be in far greater jeopardy in Sweden, where the extradition process was even more politicised than in the UK.
Similarly, Monbiot has regularly chosen to offer his uninformed opinions on events taking place in far-off lands, from Syria to Ukraine. Why then the sudden loss of confidence when it comes to a matter happening on his doorstep, one that played out over seven years on the front pages of the establishment media, including his own newspaper, and whose evidentiary basis had been aired well before The Labour Files, in a leaked Labour internal report and the Forde inquiry’s report into that leak.
Al Jazeera’s The Labour Files doesn’t cover much new ground. It deepens and enriches the evidence for abuses that were already in the public domain, including the collusion of newspapers like the Guardian with the Labour party bureaucracy in smearing as antisemites Corbyn and his supporters in the party, including many Jewish members.
There has long been masses of information for Monbiot to get his teeth into, had he chosen to break with the enforced Guardian and media consensus and look into the matter. But like his colleagues, from the Daily Mail to the Guardian, he remained silent or amplified the lies rather than risk the career damage of challenging them as those independent journalists he so excoriates dared to do.
You did not try to find the truth, and you gleefully amplified the lies.
You have a major news organisation behind you. I am just an old man with a laptop and I could find the truth, including on some of these very incidents Al Jazeera featured, in 2016.https://t.co/r09TtxOVUI https://t.co/BUFcC8yPPh
— Craig Murray – (@CraigMurrayOrg) September 24, 2022
Following the herd
In fact, Monbiot’s seeming good-faith request for more evidence to assess the Al Jazeera documentary is treachery of the worst kind. Had he really wished to be better informed, he could have spoken long ago to Jewish Labour party members like Naomi Wimborne Idrissi who have been vilified and purged from Labour because they disputed the confected political and media narrative that Corbyn was an antisemite.
Rather than show solidarity with them, or question what was happening, Monbiot once again followed the corporate herd; once again he ensured there was no one defending, let alone representing the views of, the British left as it was being defamed in the establishment media; and once again he helped to provide the veneer a supposed bipartisan consensus that Corbyn and his supporters were beyond the pale.
In 2018, at the height of the antisemitism witch-hunt, Monbiot tweeted:
It dismays me to say it, as someone who has invested so much hope in the current Labour Party, but I think @shattenstone is right: Jeremy Corbyn’s 2013 comments about “Zionists” were antisemitic and unacceptable.
It dismays me to say it, as someone who has invested so much hope in the current Labour Party, but I think @shattenstone is right: Jeremy Corbyn's 2013 comments about "Zionists" were antisemitic and unacceptable. https://t.co/nGlCGIPqpX
— George Monbiot (@GeorgeMonbiot) August 24, 2018
There is a reason that Monbiot suddenly professes to be interested in questioning whether the rampant, evidence-free antisemitism claims against Corbyn and large swaths of the Labour party were valid. Because, with the broadcasting of the Al-Jazeera documentary, he finds himself increasingly cornered. He looks ever more the charlatan, a journalist who withdrew from the struggle, standing silently by while the only chance to stop Britain’s endless political drift rightwards was eviscerated with lies promoted by the corporate media that pays his salary.
And he did so, of course, in tandem with the campaign cheerled by his own newspaper, the Guardian, to demonise the Labour left, as Al Jazeera documents.
Rather than take a stand against the McCarthyism occurring right under his nose, witch-hunts that destroyed the British left’s chances of making the Labour party a meaningful alternative to the Conservatives’ “free market” zealotry, he focused his guns on leftwing journalists. He misrepresented as apologism for Putin their critiques of western hypocrisy and of Nato’s pursuit of a proxy war in Ukraine.
Monbiot is a bad-faith actor for a further reason. Here is a reminder of his faux-naïve questions about The Labour Files:
Have there been any rebuttals? Is there substantive evidence countering its claims?
These hollow concerns should stick in his craw. Monbiot is a journalist. He knows as well as I do that Al Jazeera lawyered its programmes over and over again until it was certain that every part of them could be stood up, knowing that otherwise they would attract law suits like flies to a carcass. The feeding frenzy would have crippled the station.
My latest: The question that keeps surfacing as Al Jazeera documents Labour's endless abuses of its members is how has it been left to Qatari TV to bring these revelations to public attention? Where has the British media been for the past seven years? https://t.co/tMgpbxHXV4
— Jonathan Cook (@Jonathan_K_Cook) September 29, 2022
Monbiot knows, as I do, that if Al Jazeera had made a single solitary slip-up, the BBC, the Guardian and everyone else would be using it to discredit all the other claims in the four programmes. The noise would drown out every other issue raised in the programme.
Monbiot knows, as I do, that the blanket silence from a corporate media deeply implicated in the fabrication of the Labour antisemitism narrative is proof alone that Al Jazeera’s claims are true – as are the deceitful responses from senior Labour politicians who, when challenged, profess not to have watched, or in some cases even heard of, the documentary. One doesn’t need to be a veteran poker player to spot the tell in that conspiracy of silence.
Explosive revelations from Al Jazeera of systematic bullying, racism and illegality in the Labour party.
No one in the media talking about The Labour Files. Apparently, no one in the shadow cabinet even bothered to watch the programme. All of it memory-holed https://t.co/CAqOD77jD4
— Jonathan Cook (@Jonathan_K_Cook) October 3, 2022
Monbiot knows all of this. He is playing dumb, in the hope that his followers will fall for his act. In asking his questions, he is not trying to shed light on the Al Jazeera revelations. He is trying to keep those revelations obscured, in deep shadow, for a little longer.
CIA talking points
There is a pattern with Monbiot, one that he has been repeating for years. His position on every major issue, aside from his genuine passion for the environment, chimes precisely with that of his employer, the Guardian. He goes only as far as he is given licence to. He is not on the left, he is not a dissident, he is not even his own man. He is owned. He is a salary man. He is a corporate stooge.
Even his environmentalism, invaluable as it invariably is, has been cynically weaponised by the Guardian. It provides a hook to draw in leftists who might stray elsewhere – and thereby help fund genuinely independent outlets – were they not offered a sop to keep them loyal to the Guardian corporate brand. Monbiot is the media equivalent of a promotional line to keep a supermarket’s shoppers satisfied.
On foreign affairs, he promotes CIA talking points, advancing Washington’s ever expanding, ever more lucrative war on terror – wars that ravage the environment he supposedly cares about and constantly deflect our energies and attention from doing anything to tackle the ever more urgent climate crisis.
He readily castigates anyone who tries to point this out as a Putin apologist, choking off the ability of the left – the one group equipped to challenge establishment propaganda – to air meaningful foreign policy debates.
At home, he has equivocated on the biggest, most vital issues of our times.
He indulged the Corbyn smears, even when it meant ushering in a fanatical rightwing government that is driving the destruction of the environment at break-neck speed. Even now, he professes doubts about the latest weighty evidence from Al Jazeera that confirms the earlier, equally weighty evidence that those smears were never rooted in any kind of reality.
He has whispered his support for Assange, while doing nothing to galvanise the left into fighting not only for Assange’s personal freedom but for the freedoms of other journalists and the whistleblowers they depend on. In doing so, he has stifled efforts to shine a light into the very darkest corners of the machinery of the security state so that the public can know what is being done in its name. And further, in abandoning Assange he has abandoned the only journalist who had built a counter-weight, in Wikileaks, to take on that machinery.
Far more is at stake here than simply griping about Monbiot’s failings. Just as Monbiot follows the company line set by the Guardian, never daring to stray far from the path laid down for him, so much of the left all too readily follows Monbiot, taking their cues from his take on events even though all too often he is simply regurgitating the consensus of the liberal wing of the establishment in which the Guardian is embedded.
Monbiot is treated by much of the left as a figurehead, one whose environmentalism earns him credibility and credit with the left on foreign policy issues, from Syria to Ukraine, in which he echoes the same talking points one hears from Keir Starmer to Liz Truss. While on matters at home, like Assange and Corbyn, he sucks the wind out of the left’s sails.
As the saying goes, if Monbiot did not exist, the establishment would have had to invent him. Their dirty work looks so much cleaner with him onboard.
English
Arabic
Chinese (Simplified)
Dutch
French
German
Hebrew
Hindi
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Russian
Spanish
Swedish
Turkish
Vietnamese
The Guardian is the public voice of MI6. Monbiot is being paid to recite intelligence agency propaganda. He is not a journalist.
The idea that the Guardian represents the ‘left’ … suggests to me that J. Cook is some sort of idiot. Or that the ‘left’ is concerned about Assange? The ‘left’ and the ‘right’ would be happy to see Assange burn in hell. ‘Left’ and ‘right’ are both synonyms for ‘the Jews’. Everyone has known this for 50 years …
To call Monbiot a “clown” is an insult to clowns. He’s an intelligence asset. If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and talks like a duck – uh, well, I wonder what it could be – eh?
That’s GorgeRise MindBot to you.
Why does Cook defend Moonbat for his environmentalism? He is a stupid on this as he is on everything else. Leftards are the problem, thus Cook is a man fighting against himself in a hall of mirrors.
I agree. Voter Democracy is a giant fraud. If we want freedom we must have an autocracy. An autocrat would free Assange in no time.
There is no bad apples in the Left or Right, the Alternative Media, Mainstream Media, Journalists. All are, the problem is systemic. If you are not a system whore (including Corbyn) and “made” you are a nobody. All these individuals chose at early age to be integrated into the social slavery that imposes trickle down for submission and following orders. None of these actors is duly vetted by anything of a shadow alternative for society (does not exist, although the times demand it badly).
The article seems to ignore above, and pick a single item out of the bin. Sad, the discussion does not progress. To ignore Montbiot will eat his hat.
About Assange, the approach to his rightful defense, is botched by the same mentality. The one of playing the victim. His defenses should weight in on any single pillar in the systemics of governing and justice instead of playing silly games of toothless solidarity. Yours (the author) and theirs (activists for Assange) approach is simply wrong, gut-less, lacking any courage. Refocus, or play along.
I fondly remember when Moonbat tried to slander the redoubtable Edward Herman over Herman’s as always excellent work refuting the Srebrenica Genocide lies. Herman chewed him up and spat him out.
The Austfailian corpse maggot presstitutes are even worse regarding Assange. A Walkley Award for journalism in 2011, then en masse the vermin turned on him, the she-male feminazi harridans in the lead, replete with slimy slander and contempt. Nothing redounds to Assange’s good repute more than the enmity of these scum.
Cometh the hour, cometh the cretin. Any brain-dead insect that criticises those with a sane concern over ecological collapse (Moonbat’s one remaining virtue)deserves the fate that awaits it, very soon.
I once got into a spat online with Monbiot over Aung San Suu Kyi. He jumped onto the Suu Kyi hate club blaming her for defending Rule of Law against the Rohingya Muslim lobby pretending the Rohingya were innocent little babes. Monbiot knew nothing about Suu Kyi except it was all the rage for globalists to destroy her character so he got a few seconds in print for writing vomit.
In fact, Rohingya Muslims are Sauid-Pakistani backed jihadi beasts hellbent on killing and disappearing Buddhist, Christians, and Animists, much the same as they did to Buddhists in Bangladesh, which was once a predominant Buddhist country. Not even Bangladesh wants Rohingya back into their homeland because they know there is no such thing as a Rohingya culture. Ask any Muslim in Yangon what they call Rohingya – they call them Bengalis. Myanmar is a better place for having sent them back to where they belong.
But that aside, George Monbiot is a steaming stinking spoiled cunt. He was recently given an Orwell award by they George Orwell Foundation, which itself is Orwellian. George Orwell would have dismissed George Monbiot as a tiny spec of hardened dog shit stuck in a crevice on the soul of his boot just trouble enough to warrant a tap on a rock to knock it loose and dipose of him forever.
Rohingya Muslims are indigenous to the state of Rakhine . The systemic persecution of the coumminty over deacdes from 1960s have led to many changes in the attitudes and the behaviors of the Rohingya .Over last 40 years,the situation has been turned untenable for their survival by the junta and buddha monk.
Roningya reacted only latley by taking up arms to protect themselves from rape,murder,and burning incidents .
Now the situation is different .The coup and the fragmentation of the country along many ethnic lines are inevitable . Today Mynamar’s rebels are acknowledging the pains inflicted on the Rohingya .
Junta is hesitant .Burmese monks are intransigent,racist,fanatic and violent .
But it seems that the country has been hoisted by its own petard.
Buddhism started disappearing from India around 7th AD amd was complete by 10 AD. In Bengal it survived a little longer amkng the ruling class only .
Buddism was Rohingya Muslims are indigenous to the state of Rakhine . The systemic persecution of the coumminty over deacdes from 1960s have led to many changes in the attitudes and the behaviors of the Rohingya .Over last 40 years,the situation has been turned untenable for their survival by the junta and buddha monk.
Roningya reacted only latley by taking up arms to protect themselves from rape,murder,and burning incidents .
Now the situation is different .The coup and the fragmentation of the country along many ethnic lines are inevitable . Today Mynamar’s rebels are acknowledging the pains inflicted on the Rohingya .
Junta is hesitant .Burmese monks are intransigent,racist,fanatic and violent .
But it seems that the country has been hoisted by its own petard.
Buddhism started disappearing from India around 7th AD amd was complete by 10 AD. In Bengal it survived a little longer among the ruling class only .
Buddism was existing only as syncretic Hinduism among lower castes in India when Pathan Turk Central Asian invasion started pounding India .existing only as syncretic Hinduism among lower castes in India when Pathan Turk Central Asian invasion started pounding India .Nepal was Buddist but was forcefully turned into Hindu.
Now Buddha is an avatar or part of gods in Indian system .
Buddha sites in India is owned by Hindu religious bodies and claimed to be built by Hindus
For George Monbiot to say he’s worried about the loss of soil is spot on to reach the hearts of the majority of British cretins.
I spent a number of years living in England and there’s no words to describe what a cesspit of humanity it is. It’s a disgusting hole.
The trash graduates that are being churned out by the UK educational system are so unbelievable that before meeting anyone under 50 you assume them to be morons and homosexual, and it’s usually both.
The typical English woman virtue signals by dating blacks. Nine times out of ten when you see a Brit woman pushing a pram along the street, it’ll contain a fuzzy headed negro. A constant theme is an English mother with a string of black children all of whom will have different fathers.
English men don’t mind this because most of them are bisexual or homosexual. For instance, the huge number of middle aged English parents with dress wearing sons is phenomenal, and all of these sons will be ugly mentally retarded unheinged basta*ds.
I kid you not, it’s almost impossible for a male to enter any type of store, office or hospital reception in England and not have a camp freak male receptionist hit on them.
In a hospital reception across the bridge from the British Houses of Parliament I personally had a camp freak male receptionist hit on me at 11 a.m. If I was willing this disgusting English basta*d would have gone to the nearest broom closet and engaged in sodomy with me. And the rest of the staff would not have blinked an eye.
Paedophilic Pakistani child grooming gangs run rampant across England. These are a protected species and are allowed rape White English children at their leisure. A 12-year-old White girl went crying one morning to an English police station to report that she had just been raped, and the desk officer insulted her and then handed her over to a gang of Pakistanis who took her from the station spent the rest of the day and that night raping her. This is fact.
The other side to the ubiquitous Pakistani child rape gangs is that White English girls from as young as 8 will frequently be seen touting sexual favours for cigarettes and alcohol. Their mothers will be giving pound-a-shot blowjobs in nearby alleyways, while the fathers (99% of whom will be unknown and black) will be drunk 24/7 on cheap cider they bought from a Pakistani corner shop.
On top of all this is the disgusting fact that in middle class English society it’s very acceptable for 10-year-old girls to have 21-year-old boyfriends. One noted case is where a middle class 14-year-old English slut was murdered. This young English sluts’ history was that she had been dating boys from the age of 11. At 11-years-old, and with the full knowledge of her father, she had been dating a 21-year-old male.
Yet, when this young slut was murdered did her stupid father go and hide his POS face under a rock in shame? Hell no. He went on British TV to whine about the loss of his child. Were any questions raised anywhere in England about how his lack of parenting skills led to his daughter’s death? Hell no. I fu*king kid you not.
Another piece of sh*t case in England is where an English middle aged psychiatrist was murdered in a city park in the middle of the night. The English media was full of how wonderful this man was. They lamented that his death was a great loss to England because he had been a fantastically learned and world leading psychiatrist.
Alongside extolling this murdered psychiatrist’s fantastic pedigree, the English media also casually reported that he had been in the park in the middle of the night looking for sodomy buddies.
This POS homo was to be frequently found on moonless nights searching parks for debauched male strangers to have sex with in the bushes. Carrying the contagious diseases his filthy lifestyle surely imbued him with, he approached a straight male stranger in the dark park and suggested some sodomy, and, unsurprisingly, got slapped into oblivion.
And this English POS was in the business of helping people with mental health issues. In England this is normal.
In some northern English cities it’s quite common to come across males having anal sex with each other in broad daylight in public spaces. Once a passerby berated two freaks that were engaged in public sodomy on a public footway, and another freak that was nearby reported him (the berater) to the English police.
The English police took the report and investigated if the berater had said anything homophobic to the sodomising freaks, but DID NOT investigate or caution the publicly sodomising freaks for public indecency. I kid you not.
In the midst of this loser environment the typical arrogant English person struts around as if their sh*t doesn’t smell. They are so arrogant it wouldn’t actually be hard to convince them to package their excrement and attempt to sell it.
In their own minds they are better than Americans and other Western Europeans, and way above the Slavs. It’s this arrogance that has Ukrainian flags now more common in England than the Union Jack. You see, in their minds the British Empire still exists. And Ukrainians being slaughtered in their thousands doesn’t matter, it’s all about Empire and superiority.
When a loser people stink and are up to their ears in their own excrement, it’s time for them to drop the arrogance. But the more England and the English stink and the further the excrement rises, the more they cling onto the coattails of Empire.
Someone needs to inform the English morons that they’d never have had an Empire in the first place if it wasn’t for the Ashkenazi Jewish management. If the Ashkenazi had been invited to Ireland instead of England in the 16th century, they’d have just as easily managed the Irish to build an Empire as they did the English.
Being arrogant is one thing, but when the arrogant have absolutely nothing to be arrogant about, it becomes especially nauseating. After a stint with the loser English you’ll develop a deep seated dislike for them and their debauched loser country.
I can tell you with certainty that within two decades the streets and rivers of England will flow with blood. And most of this blood will be British blood.
The Muslims also see what vile disgusting cowardly losers the English are. They see what an abhorrently filthy hellish spectacle that English education and institutions have become.
For instance, Professor Pants Down, the chap that built the computer model which the lockdowns were based on, isn’t just immoral and easily bought, he is actually stupid. I’m not kidding here, this fellow really is of extremely low intelligence, he is actually a cretin and a fool.
Then there’s the current English Prime Minister, Truss. Mentally wise, she’s up the Professor’s street. On top of this, Truss started in a lowly position in British politics and actually slept her way to the top. Again, I kid you not, this airhead had sex with a politician she worked for. When did a prostitute retire after the first client?
This trashy very un-good looking lady is British PM because she followed Ashkenazi instructions and had sex with the correct low-life English politicians.
Historically, low IQ sluts could sometimes sleep their way to employment and movie stardom. And now certinous sluts can sleep their way to being British Prime Minister.
Post Modern English progress, I assume.
Believe me, when the British Muslims are eventually let off their leash the loser White English are going to get one hell of a lesson as to what their much loved diversity is really all about. Their rivers will run red.
In the meantime, the British Autumn roll-out of the mRNA poisons are an astounding success. For Satan and his Ashkenazi puppets that is. The White English are stampeding over each other to get it. The neighbours that got it two days ago and who are now going around with purple faces and black tongues do not deter other English people from taking the jabs.
The mRNA poison might kill English people, but, seemingly, getting dead this way is a less severe type of dead than the dead that results if they get infected with the fictional virus.
This ties in with the old English bit*ch that paid £12million to protect her paedophile son from investigation by US authorities. In the days after the bit*h had paid this, English people went out in their millions into the streets to celebrate her. They had communal meals to honour some milestone the Satan worshipping POS had reached. Later when this vile devil worshipper and paedophile protector died, the English scrubbed the skin from around their eyes wiping away tears for her.
It’s said the Chinese made billions shipping over tissues to the UK. Then , take a look at the disgusting vile inbred creature that now sits on the British throne. An absolute POS. And the English worship him unquestionably. They’d eat his excrement if he presented it to them in a bowl floating on a bed of his urine with a side helping of his wife’s used tampons.
My advice for anyone interested is to avoid England with the same gusto as you’d avoid choosing Iran to hold a homosexual stag party.
Dear Cheedo Goun,
You’re more twisted than Attah Alullah, the Pakistani born jihadi responsible for the not-really-genocide.
If you want to talk smack about Burma, you’re talking to the wrong guy, and you have no idea what you’re talking about.
You’ve never been to Burma, and to say shit like that about monks is like saying Kamala Harris is intelligent, or Fuck Joe Biden is an honest man. It’s just wrong.
Whoever you are, you are poorly informed mah ah lo phin sibu
You seem to be a very low IQ emotional animal who seems to have found out shelter in the right place- Burmese prison guarded by the monks.
Actually the indoctriantion is complete .Violent urge comes easily to you .
Try the Cathoci church . Pedophilia and god together . Even Noble can be awarded while doing both .
Falwell Jr is another vairaint of multiafceted sexual satieteis . He was for 7 years watching the video of his wife having sex with the pool man .
Big Chrill ,Jimmy Savile, and powerful famous sex abusers who ahve infiltrated the highest recahes of Britsih life
CYRIL SMITH ( Big Cyril ) ,cover up by Margaret Thatcher , let the files of over 100 go missing, regular sexual rendevous at Elm Guest House over Hammersmith bridge ( Washington Post ,Juky 7,2014) point to the prevalence .
At least 10 MPs were accused of abusing children and escaping the justice ( Daiky Beast Jul 8,2017)
Plymouth child abuse case by local women
Childrens home in Wales and Engalnd suffered sexual violence at hands of the peopel who were supposed to protect them.
Here in USA Q Anon might have been a distraction from actual sexual violence agisnt children by higher ups.
‘Dirty tricks’ intelligence operatives don’t usually expose those who actually run the UK and the West on alternative media. They are more likely to indulge in discrediting authentic dissidents and diversionary sideshows.
The Met Police once infiltrated British lefties who were considered a threat to the establishment. I mentioned this in the past.
Paper conservatives get the same treatment if they don’t follow the script. You wrote the below in September.
Truss isn’t entirely clueless. She is a trained accountant familiar with budgeting, taxation, and public finances. Unfunded tax cuts for top earners and scrapping a cap on bankers’ bonuses while soaring energy bills and consumer prices are making life unpleasant for normies shows poor judgment on her part.
She and her African lackey were too eager to implement their Britannia Unchained race to the bottom tax haven manifesto.
As with Starmer and Labour, Sunak was the preferred candidate from the beginning. The Hindu golem also wants to cut taxes for his affluent License Raj family, fellow banksters, and corporate overlords. He is just more cautious and wily.
The non-partisan Institute for Fiscal Studies noted the following in August.
Across the pond, the bailout package Barack ‘mutt like me’ Obama supported rescued Wall Street. Moreover, his administration protected financial executives from prosecutions. Today he has a net worth of $70 million. He and his wife are expected to earn nearly $250 million in total after leaving the White House.
Though Corbyn deserves praise for not conforming to usual suspects and City of London orthodoxy, he is inconsistent and at times irrational.
He hasn’t organized protests against systemic farm murders in the new South Africa. English girls, being abused by Pakistani Labour voters, equally need his help.
The traditional left would have resisted open borders Corbyn endorsed in 2019. Imported serfs lower wages and are used to circumvent unions funding his party.