
The mutiny has arisen because many in the West see only too clearly that the western ruling structure is an illiberal mechanical ‘control system’.
I have been writing for some time that Europe (and the U.S.) are in a period of alternate revolution and civil war. History warns us that such conflicts tend to be extended, with peak episodes which are revolutionary (as the prevailing paradigm first cracks); yet which, in reality, are but alternate modes of the same – a ‘toggling’ between revolutionary peaks and the slow ‘slog’ of intense cultural war.
We are, I believe, in such an era.
I also have suggested that a nascent counter-revolution was slowly gathering – one defiantly unwilling to recant traditionalist moral values, nor prepared to submit to an oppressive illiberal international order posing as liberal.
What I had not expected was that the ‘first shoe to drop’ would occur in Europe – that it would be France that would be the first to break the illiberal mould. (I had thought that it would break first in the U.S.)
The European MEP election outcome may come to be viewed as the ‘first swallow’ signalling a substantive change in the weather. There are to be snap elections in Britain and France, and Germany (and well as much of Europe) is in a state of political disarray.
Have no illusions though! The cold reality is that western ‘Power Structures’ own the wealth, the key institutions in society and the levers of enforcement. To be plain: they hold the ‘commanding heights’. How will they manage a West edging towards moral, political and possibly financial collapse? Most likely by doubling-down, with no compromise.
And that predictable ‘doubling down’ will not necessarily be confined to fights within the ‘Colosseum’ arena. It will certainly impinge into high-risk geo-politics.
Undoubtedly, U.S. ‘structures’ will have been deeply disconcerted by the European election portent. What does the European anti-Establishment mutiny imply for those Ruling Structures in Washington, especially at a time when all the world sees Joe Biden visibly wobbling?
How will they distract ‘us’ from this first crack to their international Structural Edifice?
Already, there is U.S.-led military escalation – ostensibly connected to Ukraine – but whose objective clearly is to provoke Russia into retaliation. By incrementally escalating NATO violations of Russia’s strategic ‘red lines’, it seems that the U.S. hawks seek to gain the escalatory advantage over Moscow, leaving to Moscow the dilemma of how far to retaliate. The western élites do not fully believe the warnings from Moscow.
This provocation ploy might conceivably offer either a crafted image of the U.S. ‘winning’ (‘staring down Putin’), or alternatively, come to provide a pretext to postpone U.S. Presidential elections (as global tensions spike) – thereby giving the permanent state time to get its ‘ducks in lined up’ to manage an early Biden succession.
This calculus however, is contingent on how soon Ukraine implodes either militarily, or politically.
An earlier than expected Ukraine implosion might become the staging for a U.S. pivot to the Taiwan ‘front’ – a contingency that already is being prepared.
Why is Europe in mutiny?
The mutiny has arisen because many in the West now see only too clearly that the western ruling structure is no liberal project per se, but rather is an avowedly illiberal mechanical ‘control system’ (managerial technocracy) – that fraudulently poses as liberalism.
Clearly many in Europe are alienated from the Establishment. The causes may be multiple – Ukraine, immigration or falling living standards – yet all Europeans are versed in the narrative that history has bent to the long arc of liberalism (in the post-Cold War period).
Yet that has proved illusory. The reality has been control, surveillance, censorship, technocracy, lockdowns and climate emergency. Illiberalism, even quasi totalitarianism, in short. (von der Leyen took things further recently, arguing that “If you think of information manipulation as a virus, instead of treating an infection once it has taken hold … it is much better to vaccinate so that the body is inoculated”).
When then, did traditional liberalism (in the loosest definition) turn illiberal?
The ‘about-face’ came in the 1970s.
In 1970, Zbig Brzezinski (who was to become National Security Adviser to President Carter) published a book entitled: Between Two Ages: America’s Role in the Technetronic Era. In it, Brzezinski argued:
“The technetronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society…dominated by an élite, unrestrained by traditional values…[and practicing] continuous surveillance over every citizen … [together with] manipulation of the behaviour and intellectual functioning of all people … [would become the new norm].”
Elsewhere he argued that “the nation-state as a fundamental unit of man’s organised life has ceased to be the principal creative force: International banks and multinational corporations are acting and planning in terms that are far in advance of the political concepts of the nation-state”. (i.e. Business cosmopolitanism as the future.)
David Rockefeller and the power brokers around him – together with his Bilderberg grouping – seized on Brzezinski’s insight to represent the third leg to ensuring that the 21st century would indeed be the ‘American Century’. The other two legs were control of oil resources and dollar hegemony.
Then followed a key report, Limits to Growth, (1971, Club of Rome (again a Rockefeller creation), which provided the deeply flawed ‘scientific’ underpinning to Brzezinski: It predicted an end to civilization, owing to population growth, combined with depleting resources (including, and especially, depleting energy resources).
This dire prediction was imputed to say that only economic experts, tech experts, leaders of multinational corporations and banks had the foresight and technological understanding to manage society – subject to the complexity of Limits to Growth.
Limits to Growth was a mistake. It was flawed, yet that did not matter: President Clinton’s adviser to the UN Rio Conference, Tim Wirth, admitted the error, yet cheerfully added: “We have got to ride the global warming issue. Even if the theory is wrong, we will be doing the ‘right thing’ in terms of economic policy”.
The proposition was wrong – but the policy was right! Economic policy was upended, based on faulty analysis.
The ‘godfather’ to the further pivot to totalitarianism (apart from David Rockefeller), was his protégé (and later, Klaus Schwab’s ‘indispensable adviser’), Maurice Strong. William Engdahl has written how “circles directly tied to David Rockefeller and Strong in the 1970s birthed a dazzling array of élite (private-invitation) organizations and think tanks”.
“These included the neo-Malthusian Club of Rome; the MIT-authored study: ‘Limits to Growth’, and the Trilateral Commission”.
The Trilateral Commission however, was the secretive heart to the matrix. “When Carter took office in January 1976, his Cabinet was drawn almost entirely from the ranks of Rockefeller’s Trilateral Commission – to such an astonishing degree that some Washington insiders called it the ‘Rockefeller Presidency’”, Engdahl writes.
Craig Karpel, in 1977, also wrote:
“The presidency of the U.S. and the key cabinet departments of the federal government have been taken over by a private organization dedicated to the subordination of the domestic interests of the United States to the international interests of the multi-national banks and corporations. It would be unfair to say that the Trilateral Commission dominates the Carter Administration. The Trilateral Commission is the Carter Administration”.
“Every key U.S. Government foreign and economic policy post, since Carter, has been held by a Trilateral”, Engdahl writes. And so it continues – a matrix of overlapping membership that is little visible to the public, and which very loosely may be said to have constituted the ‘permanent state’.
Did it exist in Europe? Yes, branches across Europe.
Here lies the root to last weekend’s European ‘mutiny’: Many Europeans refuse the concept of a controlled universe. Many are defiantly unwilling to recant their traditional ways of life or their national allegiances.
The Rockefeller Faustian bargain of the 1970s had one narrow segment of the American ruling cadre seceding from the American nation to occupy a separate reality in which they disassembled an organic economy to the benefit of the oligarchy, with ‘compensation’ coming only from their embrace of identity politics and the ‘just’ rotation of some diversity into corporate executive suites.
Looked at in this way, the Rockefeller deal can be viewed as a parallel to the South African ‘arrangement’ that ended Apartheid: the Anglo-élites held onto economic resources and power, whilst the ANC, on the other side of the equation, got a Potemkin façade of their taking political power.
For Europeans, this Faustian ‘arrangement’ degrades Humans down to identity units occupying the spaces between markets, rather than markets being the ancillary to an organic human-centred economy, as Karl Polanyi wrote some 80 years ago in The Great Transformation.
He traced the turmoil of his era down to one cause: the belief that society can, and should, be organised through self-regulating markets. For him, this represented nothing less than an ontological break with much of human history. Prior to the 19th century, he insisted, the human economy had always been “embedded” in society: it was subordinated to local politics, customs, religion and social relations.
The converse (Rockefeller’s technocratic illiberal cum identity paradigm) leads only to the attenuation of social bonds; the atomisation of community; to the lack of metaphysical content and thus to an absence of existential purpose and meaning.
Illiberalism is unfulfilling. It says: You don’t count. You don’t belong. Many Europeans evidently now get it.
Which somehow takes us back to the question of how the western strata will react to the nascent mutiny against the International Order that has been accelerating across the globe – and which has now surfaced in Europe, albeit with diverse colorations and some ideological baggage.
It is not likely – for now – that the Ruling Strata will compromise. Those who dominate tend to fear existentially: Either they keep dominating, or they lose all. They see only a zero sum game. Each side’s status becomes frozen. People increasingly meet only as ‘adversaries’. Co-citizens become dangerous threats, who must be opposed.
So, consider the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Leaders in the U.S. ruling strata comprise many zealous supporters of a Zionist Israel. As the International Order starts to crack, this segment of structural power in the U.S. is likely to be uncompromising too, fearing a zero-sum outcome.
There is an Israeli narrative to the war and a ‘rest of world narrative’ – and they don’t really meet. How to arrange things? The transformative effect of seeing ‘others’ differently – Israelis and Palestinians – presently is not on the table.
That conflict has the potential to get much worse – and for longer.
Might the ‘Ruling Strata’ – desperate for a certain outcome – seek to fold (and try to conceal) the horrors of this west-Asian struggle within a wider geo-strategic war? One in which greater multitudes become displaced (thus dwarfing a regional horror)?
I’m still waiting for someone to explain exactly how the US will pivot to Taiwan in a military sense. Just sending weapons to the DPP isn’t going to do much.
The latest ‘plan’ some US general is touting is to send thousands of dummy drones over the sky of Taipei, which is then supposed to ‘confuse’ China’s military, allowing the US and its allies (allies that are never named by the way) to have ‘time’ to stage and ‘support’ Taiwan defenses.
But it takes about ten minutes, maybe 15 on a lazy day, for Chinese fighters to travel from the mainland to Taiwan. And how are dumb drones, or even armed drones going to ‘confuse’ cruise missiles or smart bombs as they destroy Taiwan airfields and other military infrastructure?
Is the PLA going to say, “Look, up in the sky, it’s a bird, it’s a plane… No, it’s a thousand drones upholding truth, justice, and the American Way!” And then say, “Well, that’s that. We better go home and call it a day.”
Why not just let peaceful unification happen? Can’t do that, because the US is only interested in death and destruction. Last year I thought there couldn’t be a NATO push into Ukraine. That it would be too risky, leading to World War. Now I’m not so sure. These people are lunatics and simply don’t care.
oh, how i wish that europe could shake off the bonds of the zioneocon hegemon and just get back to good old europe. you know, france warring with germany and the u.k. stabbing both in the back. at least in the good old days they kept their destruction mostly to themselves, toppling each other’s empires. if they could just get back to killing one another, the rest of the world could get some respite from their perfidious alabian ways. ahh, the good old days how i miss them.
The reason ZATO has to train the hapless Hohols inside the Ukraine is that
otherwise they´d claim political asylum before you can say Ooops! and there´s
no legal recourse against it (no, seriously).
Now here is where Crooke’s fly unzips and his MI-6 bell end peeps out. Carter was a front for the mighty Trilateral Commission and uh, mumble mmble he was shit through a goose in one term and got October-surprised by CIA because he put straight-arrow Stan Turner in as DCI, who was a batshit hawk but not an authentic criminal psycho ultra groomed by CIA mumble mmble.
But yeah it’s Rockefeller who runs everything. These Rockefellers. “They control it. All of it. All of it,” in a censored fit of pique that nuked cub reporter Davis’ career.
https://www.salon.com/2012/04/13/making_politicians_look_bad_a_fireable_offense/
Funny how “they” go unmentioned in all these illiberal hijinks: DCI Bush who shot Reagan and missed and got away with it, kicking off four subsequent administrations headed by CIA nomenklatura – him, Clinton, Bush, and Obama. The guys who wrote the PATRIOT Act and did germ warfare on Congress when they didn’t pass it quick enough. The social media OGA censors who purged Trump.
This history of ideas routine is very helpful in obscuring the role of that epochal organization innovation and defining condition of contemporary history, CIA impunity. Crooke was one of Poppy’s British butlers and he’s still laying out smart togs for Langley knuckledraggers, manning the Corby Trouser Press and seeing to it that Angel will dress left.
This history of ideas does not pass the laugh test. You’re not at Saint Andrews trying to make jugeared inbred royals feel smart, you’re talking to CIA’s subject population. We know what’s going on. Cut the shit.
1800 words and not a single interesting thought, that’s quite an accomplishment. He could have talked about how the Covid lockdowns ripped off Europe’s “liberal” mask to reveal a fascist goon, but he didn’t. Instead he mentions a book Brzezinski wrote in 1970.
As for Ukraine, I think a neutral observer, which Crooke clearly isn’t, would agree that Europe wants to provoke Russia even more than the Biden administration does. There is ample documentation for this.
Did you miss Brexit, when the common people of Britain rebelled against the establishment?
“rebelled against the establishment” is a good one …
the Britons wanted fewer Polacks (“taking their jobs”) and not to pay for
“Brussels” (which was a flat-out lie, Britain always was a net receiver);
now they have fewer Polacks (who tended to actually work) and a deluge of
Jamaicans and Pakis who are more into knifing and grooming, trade with
Europe is at a standstill and – to add insult to injury – the Putin has turned
off their fish and chips (well, maybe not the chips); shot, meet clit.
– I still hold the entire Brexit brouhaha was an attempt by the City to get out
from under EU regulations (in hopes of becoming Europe´s Hong Kong,
and to hell with the rest); very anti-establishment, that 😆
There was no Brexit or Exit!
Brexit: A Deal Not Done
https://www.ukcolumn.org/article/brexit-deal-not-done
It’s not exactly an oxymoron, but provoking a nuclear power, does seem to be awfully stupid and counterproductive in terms of survival, so ….. why would anyone do it? This is the question of this era. What in hell is the answer?
Europe is doomed unless it can have a real Democracy, and that includes ballot options of mass deportation of non-Europeans. Reason why is that the only country in Europe that gave it’s a people a yes or no vote on mass immigration in the first place is Hungary. Every other country forced it on their people and then made up FUCK YOU laws to their people to silence dissent [so called hate speech laws].
>Britain always was a net receiver
Sure — so the nation with the second largest economy of all EU members was a ‘net receiver’? — how did the EU work then? —
hat Deutschland einfach für alles bezahlt?did Germany pay for the whole thing?The UK was always a net contributor, not a ‘net receiver’ — the UK government provides info and some historical data on that:
The UK contribution to the EU budget
(Some per capita info on the 2017 EU budget from the BBC.)
Whether money (the UK’s contribution to the EU budget) was ever a reasonable argument in favor of Brexit is another question.
Perhaps the biggest fuck up in Brexit was failing to negotiate an ironclad replacement for the Dublin Regulation — without a treaty between the EU and the UK on asylum, there is no way to legally push those crossing the channel back to France (if UK leaders had balls like Orban it could still be done of course) — this is also now affecting Ireland, as migrants looking to escape being sent to Rwanda travel to Northern Ireland, then cross into Ireland and apply for asylum there.
All those low IQ third world migrants invading the UK now will ultimately cost a lot more than remaining in the EU would have.
The Russo-Ukraine war has highlighted one thing, if nothing else. If anyone would pay attention, of course. The message is, almost all countries in this world are historically multilingual and multiethnic if not outright multiracial. That’s discounting the presence of new arrivals over the last several decades.
However the Russo-Ukraine war may be settled, and all wars end eventually, Ukraine will still be a multiethnic and multilingual if not outright multiracial nations and ethnic Ukrainian nationalists will still have to live with that.
It raises the question, what are we fighting for? Why are we spending hundreds of billions of dollars to keep the fight going? There is an argument that the road to the past two world wars was paved with the grievances of the smaller nations. The grievances are too many and too persistent for them to ever be balanced against each other. I don’t know about the people who live in these countries, but the political class in them seems to periodically produce leaders who think they can drag the great powers into their conflicts with no consequences to themselves. Then then they trampled and, when they do, they complain about being treated as buffer states, and new grievances emerge.
The major powers need to act in concert and step down on this s***, and sorry about that. The ultimate issue underlying the Russo-Ukraine war is the desire of the elite class in the West to treat the breakup of the Soviet Union as decolonization process akin the decolonization of Sub-Saharan Africa. In Africa, the Black Africans were told, the colonial boundaries were going to be the national boundaries regardless of how they cut across tribal, religious and linguistic lines or the boundaries of whatever polities existed in the precolonial era. Does the West have the right to dictate the same beyond the boundaries of the former Soviet Union?
There was, in fact, a post-World War II strategic settlement in Europe in the form of the Helsinki Accord. The Helsinki Accord settled all of the boundaries up to the border of the Soviet Union. If there is going to be a peace process and second phase of the European strategic settlement, it has to start with a declaration by the victorious power, the United States, the United Kingdom as head of the Commonwealth, Russia as the legal successor to the Soviet Union, and France that the Helsinki boundaries are going to be upheld.
Maybe youy have heard of the concept of the Cordon Sanitaire. The people who have as much heard of this idea take it as a tool to turn the nations of Eastern Europe into buffer states. Maybe it wasn’t just that. It might also have been a system for restraining the grievances of the political class in the various Eastern European nations. If the political leaders of these nations today complain that they are being turned into buffer states, the response essentially has to be, shut the f*** up. You’re not lighting up another world war.
Anybody can find out what the boundaries of Ukraine were during the Soviet era and how the Ukraine was put together as a Soviet republic. Nobody knows what the boundaries of Ukraine should be because there was no independent and defined Ukraine as a nation in the contemporary sense prior the Soviet Union creating it as a constituent republic in the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. There is no historic reason why all of the territory put under Ukrainian administration by the Soviet government has to be part of Ukraine. Notably, there is no basis for imagining that the Crimean Peninsula is historic Ukrainian territory. It isn’t. It was once Ottoman. Not Turkish. Ottoman. The Ottoman Empire is extinct to history, and the contemporary Turkey is not the Ottoman Empire’s legal successor.
Please note, by declaring that the Helsinki boundaries are to be upheld, the western border of Ukraine would be protected against the claims of the Eastern European countries. Notably, there can be no discussion of any transfers of territory however small until stability is achieved. Stability means, among other things, a settlement of the Russo-Ukraine war.
I sometimes like to tag these discussions by point out that I went to junior college without a high school diploma, got a B.A. degree from an unendowed private college deemed Tier III by the keepers of the university caste system and, eventually and quite recently, an M.A. degree in English literature from a California State University. That’s a state university, not the University of California. They’re different systems.
If I can figure this stuff out, why can’t the Ivy League graduates who populate our policy establishment do the same? If they want to play with matches and rise up to the stratosphere in a pillar of fire, they do it by themselves, and leave me out. What they look like to me is a bunch of dilettantes who started to let the idea of playing with power go their heads while they were still in prep school and never grew up.
A case in point is Victoria Nuland. What a disaster for the world. Same for her husband Robert Kagan. Nuland played a principal role in making Ukraine the disaster it is today and Kagan has had a long career as a leading neoliberal interventionist policy theorist. Meanwhile, we (the United States) have spent enough money on this war to educate a generation of graduate and professional students. Or make community college and state college free for a generation. Or finance career and vocational training for all of the underemployed people in the United States. These are only three possibilities. The same money also could have paid for a lot of infrastructure too. That’s not counting the zillions we blew off in Afghanistan either.
Just understand. All welfare is corporate welfare. That goes for the poor mama on welfare with three or four kids. It goes for all of the foreign aid we give away too, civilian or military. And everything in between, whatever it may be.
This sounds like when Marxists look at a failed Marxist economy and society and claim that it is not truly Marxist: an attempt to defend an ideology in the face of its failures.
The liberal ideology has in it to turn totalitarian when the need arises. The best example is the Chilean liberal dictatorship of two decades (70s-80s), but many of the other South American military dictatorship also were tyrannical restitutions of liberalism.
Current liberal dystopia is not illiberal, as you claim Mr. Crooke, it is truly liberal, it is what happens when you take liberal ideology to its absurd extremes.
The best aspect of the liberal ideology is its hedonism. It makes liberal leaders corrupt and cowards, so they won’t take us into a major war. They will just leave us much poorer, both demographically and economically.
So you are saying that as long as the devils fight among each other, the angels and we the people can sleep soundly.
It is ok to dream. And such dreams under a monarchic system were once possible. That was when kings had real sovereignty. Now kings are no more and sovereign countries exist in name only.
Look at England under Edward I; in 129o he issued the Edict of Expulsion ordering the Jews out of the kingdom after tiring of their burdensome ways and gave them three months to pack and leave. Now that we could call the good ole days. Under the current globalist dominated world order we see Rahm Emmanuel, the Jewish American Ambassador to Japan, lobbying the Japanese government for extending LGBTQ rights, and permanently defeated Japan duly obliging.
“ ahh, the good old days how i miss them.“
The more the so called ((liberal)) globalist order is in place the more there will be new adherents to your club. But the bastards leading the helm would rather make the human race perish than give up their tyrannical order. As the author wrote, they will keep doubling down.
The wider the imperial stretch, the sooner the Empire will implode. Remains to see whether it implodes with a bang or with a whimper.
The big question to ponder is whether the Pivot to Asia is part of the plan to dismantle the American Empire in favor of the NWO or is it just an excess of hubris by the Western PTB using America as their attack dog.
Opening a front with China will be the sure end of the Western Empire, and most of the world will have a sigh of relief. Very tragic for a Western civilization that gave the world so much.
You must be an hundred years old or something. You give yourself an air of knowledge about American politics that on closer examination is just superficial commentary and solipsism. Kindly make a useful contribution if you know anything. You are assuming a right to condescension that frankly you don’t have.
The problem with the Europeans, just as with the jews, is that they got Christianity wrong.
The jew approach has always been that the Zionist hierarchy is the natural world order. Everything the jew does is in pursuit of that end, and that imposition.
The Cousinhood infiltrated the Anglo-Saxon, European and Russian mind, in inserted that kike virus, which came to fruition in the (ongoing) wars of the 20th and 21st centuries.
Had the White man got Christianity right, this would not have been possible. Christianity — specifically Christian Logos — is the natural world order. Zionism is the unnatural (Satanic) world order.
Europe/Western Civilization was on the road to getting Christianity right, but the jew (Satan) was able to gain purchase. For example, it got its hooks in facile European elites and royalty, because they were sick, weak and flawed, and succumbed to sin (pride, ignorance, greed, gluttony, sloth, wrath, vanity, envy, lust, license).
Jesus did not succumb to any of these, which is why he became Christ, an ideal.
Zionism is currently getting its ass kicked on a worldwide basis (Israel: fail. Ukraine: fail. Mideast wars: fail. US/Anglosphere/Nato: fail. But destroying Zionism is not enough if some other interloper and poseur steps in and snatches what belongs to Jesus Christ and only Jesus Christ.
That interloper will fail, too. But of course, we can’t afford any more interlopers. We’ve got to get it right, or we will die. If Satan couldn’t snatch it, it can’t be done. This means if humanity is too stiff-necked to save itself by relenting to the Natural World Order and continues to prop up Satan, it is making a conscious choice to destroy itself.
Remember about seven years ago all the elites were buying islands? I remember even Trump. Maybe they actually have plans to hide. They could even be saying they are buying islands and hiding elsewhere underground. They may think they can actually create a nuclear war, hide out for a while and then come back. There is even a lot of talk about the “nuclear winter” being false as well. Maybe they would hide for a couple years and get everything they wanted. Half million people left That they could manipulate again
That one sentence makes your comment worthless and a waste of TUR space and its readers’ time.
How could unification be peaceful, and justified, when the Taiwanese people are nearly all born in Tauwan since its separation from mainland China, don’t want unification and are armed to resist it?
William Engdahl is cited as writing: «When Carter took office in January 1976…»
Carter obviously took office in january 1977, american presidential elections are always in november of leap years, then the winner or «winner» takes the seat the following january.
This is a small mistake in itself but I wonder if it was made by Engdahl in his book or if it’s a typo by the author of this article?
We are all getting older…
Limits to Growth was a mistake. It was flawed.
What was the flaw Alister? Resources are infinite?
Hasn’t that already been set in motion?
Not sure if you looked at the last election results, but 60% of Taiwan voters supported the KMT and TPP last go-around, and as a result, the pro-US DPP lost their parliamentary majority.
Both the KMT and TPP are happy with the status quo, meaning ‘one China, two systems’, which means eventual unification. Or at the very least, peaceful coexistence.
You might want to consider how the former head of the KMT was not too long ago on the mainland, touting peaceful reunification; extolling how Taiwan and China have to resolve their differences and stressing that both are one people.
Youth? The TPP is said to have been more popular among younger voters, most defecting from the DPP. Prior to the election there was talk of a KMT-DPP unified candidate, and if that had happened, the separatist DPP would have been crushed.
So before you go on about how the kids of Taiwan don’t want unification, do a little research. The fact that you haven’t is not my fault, by the way.
Two points. First, if you think my comments are a waste of your time, then just skip over them or hit the ‘ignore’ switch. Obviously you thought enough about what I wrote to respond, albeit with an ignorant and snarky comment.
Second, who are you to presume to tell UR readers what is or is not a waste of their time? Who made you the arbiter of the UR comment section?
Even if it were to become a full blown mutiny across the entire bloc, what difference will it make at this point, the damage has been done and the West is now only a geographic region and no longer a civilization.
Unless you classify a mass of mindless consumer drones shepherded by a plutocratic elite a civilization. Of course there are a few exceptions amongst us plebs, but far too few to make a real difference in anything of importance, I hope I’m wrong.
What this says is that reducing the planet’s population by eight billion in the next five years is even more urgent than when the plan was announced.
Amazing! Another article which distorts a certain Brzezinski paragraph beyond recognition. This author inserts his own words between [ ] brackets interspersed with the actual Brzezinski ones, perhaps to deflect criticism. The bigger problem is that, as I said, he completely defaces Brzezinski’s point of view, which is actually an *alert* against the technocratic order.
Previously this occurred in an article by the apparently pseudonymous Pierre Simon, which was actually somewhat involuntarily funny. Is the present author, on the other hand, writing under his own name?
The Unz Review provides an invaluable service to the public by exposing the fact that many state officials of past decades are actually morons. Morons working in intelligence is a really hilarious combination.
Here’s the actual paragraph by Brzezinski, plus the two following ones:
Gee, what do Victoria Nudelman and Robert Kagan have in common with the other fifth columns of treason-doers, traitors and cut-throats who have been burrowing away at Western Civilization and the world for 2000+ years for their own nepotistic, grandiose, malignant narcissist, messianic vision, one that finally got a real foothold in the “Jewish Century” world wars and revolutions? Golly, I just can’t figure it out. I know they’ve got something in common, but I just can’t put my finger on it…
Who appointed you tone police, Ivan, some MI-6 pedo? You sound like a rectally-prolapsed victim of Jimmy Saville, since we’re talking about everything but substance.
CIA spooks and their subaltern henchmen will never mention national security impunity. It’s always culture or history or ideas or ideology or other airy fairy abstract shit. You will continue to be politically helpless until you are aware of that.
Good article
This article is very helpful for others
“Money is essential for everyone, but true wealth lies in kindness and emotions. Money buys conveniences, not happiness or genuine relationships. to learn about managing money wisely and cherish what truly matters. Real wealth is in a full heart
Truth is the Perfidious government has every incentive to lie through their
teeth; Thatcher, temporibus illis, eked out a shitload of “temporary” exceptions
but demanded their full share of institutions (say, Airbus);
the only regular net payers have been Germany, Austria and Finland, with the
Netherlands riding the cusp (sound familiar?); with the eastward expansion
everybody has to shoulder more, and the “exceptions” were running out, but that´s it.
In the fullness of time the Perfidious will get out of Ireland (and Cyprus, Gibraltar
and the Malvinas); I´m not too sure about Scotland – it´s a bad idea to divide an island.
If the (((English))) want to play Hong Kong, let them
(Little Britain got itself in this kerfuffle because they wouldn´t anger
the
settlersUnionists, even if then they could afford it – don´t expectany sympathies).
If Crooke can’t even bring himself to “name the Jew,” then he has no credibility. Either he is ignorant of root causes or he is a coward. Either way, it’s bad news for him. And we get half the story, at best.
China doesn’t need to attack Taiwan. It demonstrated that a few weeks ago, by establishing a moving picket fence of its Naval force around the Island, calling the US Navy to a game of bumper ships. The US Navy, wisely, declined.
The powers to be with their US based vandals and the City of Dragons’ agent Fuckafellar shall leave the US an empty shell. They shall vandalise the World to maintain power.
These Malthusian Vandals are an existential threat to mankind. Who but they spread slaughter and corruption?
Illusions?
Fuck you with your misdirection.
IT’S JEWS VS. MANKIND… you asshole.
It is quiet a good article, bringing what some of us already knew to the Mainstream. However, the City of Dragons and the Brutish Clown seem to always avoid mention when it comes to who is really, always, behind the slaughter and corruption around the World. Instead, the US is pointed out as the sole culprit.
If the English don’t clean house with a renewal of the Magna Carta, it will be done for them by an outside force of non-whites. The vendetta against the Malthusian pedophiles is universal in scope.
– I see you still don´t understand …
there is no such thing as “ethnic” Ukrainians;
the “Banderite” troublemakers (Stepan must be spinning in his grave in Munich)
are Ruthenians (= Galicia & Volhynia), briefly an independent kingdom
around the 12th century (which was then a meaningless intra-Rurikid rhubarb,
with Rurikids to the right and to the left of them);
the actual Ukrainians (apart from Greeks, Tatars, Germans, Goths and Serbs)
are the Cossacks, thoroughly russified after the Nordic War.
We thus have the hard to grok situation the Ukrainians ™ are the same Jews and
Waterpolacks the actual Ukrainians gained independence from in 1648.
– The point is Stalin intended it that way; Lenin added Noworossija so the
Donbass proles would majoritize the rustic Hohols, Stalin added Galicia, Volhynia,
Zakarpathia (Hungary) and Bessarabia (Romania).
Just as three mackerels on one line are easier to pull out than one, peoples
preoccupied with grievances are less problem for the central government –
… be it (((Moscow))) or (((Brussels))) – or (((Sodom-on-the-Potomac))).
Thank you for a great response to a woke wizard who can’t help being offended at an opinion.
Instead of just asking “do you think all those Taiwanese born in Taiwan can unite with China” to foster an adult conversation, the Wizard makes it personal.
Wizard, unification after estrangement takes time. The Chinese and everyone, but you, know that. Overtime, people will marry, start cross border businesses and those businesses will develope long lasting personal relations leading to bonding and respect.
Willy-nilly mass deportations should not be on the table. That said, all relatively recent migrants should individually, or by families, be given rigorous tests as to their adjustment to and compatibility with historical values of the various European nations. Such tests could be organized in an objective manner.
If the tested ones prove to be culturally “indigestible” ; they should be removed to their native lands, perhaps with modest stipends to assist them in their readjustments to their original realities.
I agree that a lot of “Christians” got it wrong, especially among the followers of the false preachers of the mega churches here in the US. If we could get through to some of them, we might find support for the synagogue waning: https://folkpotpourri.com/blasphemy-of-the-synagogue-hypocrites-exposed/
The EU and NATO are false power centers. They have people in positions of bureaucratic activity, who are paid handsomely in money and prestige, but there are no roots to them. A constant war makes NATO somewhat relevant and the misguided attempt to push a traditionalist portion of the planet outside of the system of commerce through sanctions makes the EU somewhat relevant.
The rebellion is against these two fantasies of Post-WWII arrogance. The people know that their relevance is dependent upon their ability to cause chaos and the people are tired of the meaningless chaos. The nation-state is the obvious alternative and that’s why the West wants to dissolve the nation-state with the massive migration of strangely encultured and rootless peoples.
The future is with Hungary and Serbia.
All Empires Die!
Jun 22, 2024
https://twitter.com/CitizenFreePres/status/1804513939062935664
There is no revolt against “illiberalism.” There is a a revolt against malignant government policy being dictated by capitalist oligarchs, which is the definition of liberalism. The likes of David Rockefeller can only operate in a liberal state. If someone tried doing what he did somewhere like China, he would be jailed or executed. The solution to this can only come in the form of “illiberal” authoritarianism. Doubling down on liberalism, the mechanism of capitalist oligarch control, will accomplish nothing. The state must wrest control from the oligarchs by force.
Rishi Sunak Is A Haughty Asian Indian Hindu Goldman Sachs Globalizer Infiltrator.
Rishi Sunak will hopefully be the last nail in the coffin of the evil and treasonous Tory Party.
The Tory Party And The Republican Party Both Push Mass Legal Immigration And Mass Illegal Immigration And Multicultural Mayhem.
Globalizer Geezer rat 81 year old liar Joe Biden and fat ass Baby Boomer whore Trump have been pushing to flood the USA with tens of millions of Asian Indians and extremely haughty Hindus.
These Asian Indian Haughty Hindus are so haughty that they have foreigner SLAVES and these arrogant foreigner interlopers Hindus are infesting New Jersey and many many other states.
Kamala Harris is a partial HAUGHTY HINDU of the worst sort I have ever seen and Trump and Biden and Kamala Harris have been plotting and scheming to cram tens of millions of Asian Indians and Haughty Hindus into the USA.
Kamala Harris and Biden and Trump have crawled into bed with the CHEAP LABOR FACTION of the JEW/WASP Ruling Class of the American Empire and Trump and Biden and Harris want to completely and totally destroy cultural cohesion in the USA.
Kamala Harris and Biden and Trump have weaponized the mass immigration invasion of the USA and they are attacking the European Christian ancestral core of the USA and the historic American nation.
I hereby challenge Trump and Biden and Kamala Harris to a 4 hour debate on mass legal immigration and mass illegal immigration and REFUGEE OVERLOAD and ASYLUM SEEKER INUNDATION and multicultural mayhem and American national identity and monetary policy and foreign policy and financialization and globalization and anti-White attacks and the evil machinations of the JEW/WASP Ruling Class of the American Empire.
IMMIGRATION MORATORIUM NOW
DEPORT ALL ILLEGAL ALIEN INVADERS NOW
HAUGHTY HINDUS MUST BE DEPORTED FROM ENGLAND AND THE USA
Tweet from 2021:
Billionaire Plutocrat Globalizer Oligarchs Are Attacking The USA
In the 1960s and 1970s decisions were made by treasonously evil oligarch plutocrats to deliberately destroy the U.S. as a culturally cohesive nation-state. In short, the U.S. was to be globalized and transformed into a multicultural economic region more congenial to plutocrat plundering. It is only now that the European Christian ancestral core of the U.S. is beginning to accurately perceive the malignant machinations behind current immigration policies.
The globalized oligarch plutocrats and the upper middle class snot brats and large numbers of government workers(Deep State) are using the distractionary nonsense of so-called “racism” and “sexism” and “anti-Semitism” and the squalid stuff to block any attempt at a systematic popular understanding of the civilizational destructiveness of globalization and financialization and mass immigration and multicultural mayhem and corruption.
IMMIGRATION MORATORIUM NOW
DEPORT ALL ILLEGAL ALIEN INVADERS NOW
Europa needs to provoke Russia as we factually are bankrupt. The inflationary golem needs everlasting growth, without that the euro Ponzi scheme has no future. War is a racket , when Guy Verhofstad The Belgian ultra liberal prime mister went to meidan to promote Europa, many years ago , he did not care about peace or prosperity for the Ukrainians. It was all about our financial piramide scheme, we the Western Europeans just like the Americans are addicted to free wealth . Our true god is the money printer and fractional banking is the engine of the golden demon. The European Americans use their free money for weapons while European Europeans invest it all in free health care and the doll
Did you know that more than 35 % of Western Europeans are on benefits?
And that doesn’t even include the pensioners.
18 0000 words of free bullshit
While these center-right parties do what you describe in the Anglo world, the center-right European People’s Party do it to the other European peoples.
Interview of Viktor Orbán in Kossuth Radio’s Good Morning, Hungary! program
https://hungarytoday.hu/viktor-orban-there-is-an-ongoing-population-replacement-in-europe/
Some quotes:
“The European People’s Party, which calls itself right-wing, has announced that it is joining the left.”
“This coalition that has been formed – liberals, left, People’s Party – led by Manfred Weber, who has a role as a Beelzebub in the destruction of Brussels politics, (…) is a pro-war coalition”
“There is a population replacement in Europe, the European population is shrinking, and the number of migrants and the number of people belonging to the Muslim community born here is radically increasing,”
“Therefore, we have a pro-war, anti-economic, and pro-migration coalition in Europe [liberals, left, People’s Party]: compared to Weber, Von der Leyen is just a ministrant little girl,”
I get the strangest feeling that the movie ‘Invasion of the Body Snatchers’ was actually taking place for hundreds if not thousands or millions or billions of years.
The (((PODS))) are global galactic entities who snatch our minds and soul and use us as hive mind psychophants to destroy society from within.
Video Link
Who controls the state?
Jewish Hegemocracy.
Irony: Jewish Power treats whites like Palestinians, but whites targeted by Jews support Zionism.
Well now the Europeans have millions of niggers and sand-niggers living in their lands. What to do about that?
Utter Garbage
UK was ALWAYS a net contributer
We were conned in to joining by The Queer (Heath) in the 70s and since then the Establishment has done EVERYTHING in it’s power to prevent us leaving. If the “City” had wanted us to leave, it would have happened immediatey – no question
The truth is, Brexit was never supposed to happen and our politicians (of every stripe) in cahoots with the (((mainstream media))) delayed it for nearly three years after the vote until they could delay it no longer. We wanted out of the EU so badly that we made Boris fucking Johnson Prime Minister in order to get it done ffs.
Either you have no idea what you’re talking about or you are purposefully dissembling.
Get this asiatic shit and african shit out of our Western Civilization. Plans must be put into place to get ride of these scumbags.
Fuck debating! That’s going to solve nothing. Only force is not going to get the job done.
Ukraine will revert to its natural condition. A farm stand in the Polish countryside.
The good news is that some American servicemen refuse to continue everlasting Jew slaughter. They say many Americans think like they do.
.ukraine is fighting for its very survival…don’t give up the ghost! Thanh U, Joe Biden, & we hope that U win again, in 2024..!
stop bombing their countries. don’t blame the pawns, blame the “grandmasters”.
we have a mockingbird media and martingale military, all singing to the tune of the mighty wurlitzer.
this is all on william the conqueror (or bastard), son of robert the bastard, for allowing the city of london to exist as a separate entity, by their own laws. why stop short, of one square mile?
Seems the (popular) European mutiny is real, perhaps growing. The only question is if the “Power Structures” retain the ability to subvert, divert or crush it. The day when a “newspaper” story about troops bayoneting babies could start a war are in the past.
E.g. Nigel Farage telling the BBC something that has been known for years by anyone who isn’t a mental defective.
But apparently controversial … shock/outrage about Putin’s Puppet …
Perhaps some even believe this is genuine in a government whose agencies have never in living memory been known to tell the truth.
Boris and BLiar probably will vote for Nigel, I’d guess …
the fact that Farage has been wheeled out of retirement to voice such heresies is a desperate attempt by the establishment to get the UK populace to vote – for anybody at all
Starmer (the anointed successor to the tories or blair 2.0 if you will) has singularly failed to capture the imagination of the electorate – quite the opposite, in fact
At this stage there is a distinct possibility that the turnout will be lower than 50%
How could any government claim a “mandate” in such a situation?
The above is conventional, but misleading.
1) The US Progressive Party “held the ‘commanding heights’” until it fell. And it fell because it did not understand that the US economy had to contract once Europe started producing food and artifacts for itself again after WWI, and because it was up against a socialist party that controlled US media and was run by urban political machine professionals.
2) Command economies are intrinsically unworkable. They fail because central control of of a peacetime economy is highly inefficient [1] and creates serious political problems that it does not understand and cannot remedy. The current world wide political situation is an illustration of this thesis.
In short, “doubling-down, with no compromise” by those who “hold the ‘commanding heights’” will simply prove ineffective. Woody Allen might have exaggerated a bit, but he captured something important with:

Video Link
Now, consider the same speech made by a real official of the Biden administration:
In fact, any kind of control of any non-deterministic system is possible only if the system is self-organizing and controls its own actions on the local level, uses fresh data (rather than outdated data and lies), and uses dynamic resource allocation on a local level. The military calls this “mission command”, and it is the way market economies consisting of many small shops and many customers run.
Attempts at control by doubling down won’t save the present bunch any more than it saved the Progressives.
The Jews constantly claim an ontological impossibility that violates all cosmic laws of nature: Everyone else is in the wrong, they themselves are in the right. Every idiot knows, without knowing Yin & Yang, that there are always two parties to every conflict. This is clear from every divorce. Their fault is always zero. But the law of cause and effect does not apply to them. A lie that humanity can never voluntarily accept in the long term.
German geographer Passarge described this supposed phenomenon in his work “Jewry as a landscape-ethnological problem” as a regularly building up emotional curve of the host people, which, after initial sympathy for the ingratiating Jews and the recognition of their deception, regularly turns into antipathy and responds or reacts with successive expulsion.
https://archive.org/details/Passarge-Siegfried-Das-Judentum/page/n23/mode/2up
The world should rely less on their easily deceived minds and more on their healthy instincts and intuition. If something feels fake, incongruous and wrong, then nature says: It’s wrong! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duck_test
“Rishi Sunak Is A Haughty Asian Indian Hindu Goldman Sachs…”
By all means, attack the Hindu but don’t forget that he and you both are slaves of the Jew. And as to the skank Coulter, if she was proud of the White blood which flows in her varicose veins, she should not have allowed Dinesh D’Souza to thump through the backdoor. There is no furry liked a scorned woman…
I agree… And all politicians with any power are owned and operated by zionest regardless of left or right rhetoric.
There’s lots of interesting and useful information here, and lots of truth. A number of people have written whole books about the Rockefellers. They’re definitely near the top of the “Ruling Strata.” Interesting term, that. But I prefer “crime syndicate” or Western mafia. Crime family norms (extortion, blackmail, bribery, assassination) are the only thing that fully explains their rackets.
I take serious exception to only one section here – the part about the Club of Rome and Limits to Growth. Like almost everyone else, the author rather seriously misunderstands that work. The model (World 3) that underlies the books (there have been 3) has no financial or economic variables so has nothing whatever to do with economics or economic growth. It’s a purely physical model (how much stuff is there feeding the human economy, how fast are we using it or liquidating it, how fast are we poisoning it, etc.). It’s a scenario model, so makes no predictions. It just says if you do these things (have these policies), and behave in these ways, these are the likely outcomes. At least one scenario suggested that 8.5 billion people on the planet is sustainable, but not behaving the way the rackets’ systems have behaved in modern times.
What people don’t realize is that the first book (Limits to Growth) was roundly trashed by lots of people, led by the clients – the Club of Rome. If that doesn’t make any sense to you, you should know that the main reason for that is that the book was quite clear that the clients’ pet belief – that human population was THE problem – wasn’t true. Population is a factor, but the third most important factor, and one that would likely resolve itself if the other issues were resolved. They didn’t want to hear that at all. They also didn’t want to hear that by far the biggest threat to the system is technology (technocrats that they are). Other parties from around the world have updated the model’s data and compared where we are to what the models predicted, and they’ve found that we’re not far off the base case path.
The reason I know these things is that I played a small part in building the model (the coal module, as it happens). The authors of the books and the system modelers were my systems professors, and not at MIT (where the model is still running). The real threat to us all is that the racketeers, over the last 450 years or so, have built themselves a system with a suicide gene – a fatal flaw. In systems language it’s a reinforcing feedback loop called “success to the already successful.” In biology terms, it leads to overshoot. Without balancing feedback loops, pretty much systematically wiped out by the rackets, it always leads to the implosion of the system. No exceptions. Does it look to anyone like things here on planet Earth are getting better each month?
Limits to Growth
Evolution of Criticisms
1970’s There are no effective limits.
1980’s There are limits, but they are far away.
1990’s The limits are near, but technology and markets can evade them easily.
2000’s Technology and markets do not always evade the limits, but the best policy is still to pursue economic growth, so we will have more resources to solve problems.
2010 If we had been able to sustain economic growth we would not have had trouble with limits.
Dennis Meadows
Smithsonian lecture
2014 War against Russia
>there is no such thing as “ethnic” Ukrainians;
Yes there is — they speak Ukrainian and use a variant of the Cyrillic alphabet — they are Slavs (a group of racially white peoples or ethnic groups), and while they are more closely related to other Slavic groups, e.g. Russians and Poles, than they are to, say, Danes, via GWAS they can already be distinguished from other Slavic peoples (in general Slavic ethnic groups can be distinguished from each other), and this will only become more definitive as genome data (autosomal, mitochondrial, X/Y) accumulates, and computational genomics becomes more sophisticated:
Genetic Heritage of the Balto-Slavic Speaking Populations: A Synthesis of Autosomal, Mitochondrial and Y-Chromosomal Data
It’s not just that your comments contain blatant falsehoods, which you state with a certain ignorant belligerence, but they’re also childishly formatted, and contain bullshit (((like this))) that was passé almost a decade ago — you really ought to change your moniker to nobrains.
THe author touches only lightly about the knock on consequence of aggressively engineered demographic displacement throughout the Western sovereigns.
Zero sum game is a very reactive state with an often huge blindspot that makes for no real zero sum. What the EU is doing is blazing the trail for the rest of the west. The quiescent reaction to date of the natives across these countries is telling.
Its indicating that more idiocracy “mob” people are either thinking before reacting in many cases since MSM is so widely vilified or they are tapping into strategic resources that temper the mob rule more now than perhaps ever before or in tandem it it gives that average human a bigger macro view to where informed decisions on where and when to use mass human non compliance or protest have yet to occur!
Its a patience that is now even seen in the Middle East with the enemies of the Zion state. A fact that we are all most likely living a very different mindset than before.
Good call, Mic. Too many of the dissenteriat can’t stomach the inevitable result of energy and other resource depletion – the end of industrial civilization. So instead of confronting the historical data on say, energy depletion, they smear the Limits to Growth as simply a tool of globohomo and its Great Reset gang, which its authors never were.
All major oil fields on the planet are in permanent decline. No, abiotic oil is for magician shows. Even if there were alternatives to fossil fuels that could keep the industrial juggernaut running, that would just deplete all raw materials essential to industrial economies that much faster. More geopolitical hotshot analysts need to absorb the 1st and 2nd Law of Thermodynamics. Mother Nature bats last.
The ” common people ” throughout the ” west ” are being made aware that the continuous lies and propaganda that they are being fed 24/7 is a charade of nonsensible bullshit.
The folks operating and pulling the strings of our existence have to come up with a better scam because the old stuff does not work anymore.
Conflict in Ukraine’s Donbas Region: The Geology Behind the Headlines – YouTube
Video Link
after you read this you will understand why none of the belligerents in Ukraine fighting Russia will back off no matter what happens. Trillions have been invested and the national governments of the anti russian world have been sequestered to suck whatever dollars and manpower is needed from those who the governments govern to get at the geology rich areas that Russia has saved from western investors. Those in charge of the governments are all puppets of the bankers and the bankers intend to use the war to take the minerals and to rape Russia, IMO, nothing is going to stop or divert them because it is the will of the bankers that Russia will cease to exist and the bankers control the governments.
Where the Chinese come in, is that they too would like that access to that Geology rich area.. in Eastern Ukraine.. and I think maybe the reason China has merged its interest with Russia is to get access to those minerals because there is an abundance of mineral types in Eastern Ukraine that are needed to make efficient, high density chips right there in the Don Bas Region of Ukraine.
That area also produces a lot of gas and that gas to be made into LNG and sold to Europe.. Russia SMO, interrupted a big plan that also involved the massive gas find in the Levant. These two sources of gas, explain the reason for the destruction of the Nord Stream II gas line feeding gas from Russia to Germany..
The idea of the energies companies was to kick Russia out of the gas market and to replace Russian gas with gas from these two fields, The Levante Reserve gas field and the DonBas gas field. IMO, this plan explains why the Gazians had to removed from Gaza, Palestine.
In China, it is the Communist Party of China.
Arm them and deport them to England.
Yet they are universally used during wartime when efficiency is of the highest importance, so this claim is obvious bunk.
Nonsense.
The amount of coal in the world is a mathematical fact. It can prolong industrial civilization a few hundred years. Nuclear power can prolong industrial civilization several thousand years:
https://scanalyst.fourmilab.ch/t/nuclear-fission-fuel-is-inexhaustible/1257
So much meaning in one sentence!
I wonder if politicians and journalists can emulate your condensed efficiency, the media and political discourse would be reduced time wise by 99%.
So much noise in the world, so little substance.
I think Half a Billion is the number you were thinking of
Thanks, Stewart; that sounds reasonable.
It seems that the machinations of aptly-named “Perfidious Albion” are endless. Perhaps their own people, who have been/are victims of their various deceits, will at long last call “enough” as you suggest. Hardly in history has an administration so well deserved obliteration. But my instinct says that they, their openly criminal offshoot USA and the western talmudist-masonic networks have many more tricks to play.
We shall see.
One catalyst will be survival or not of the murderous State of Israel imho.
American and british parasites are afraid, because through thror entire history they have been parasites sucking life off from work of others, who always produced them value and higher living standards.
If american and british would know their own history, they would know that for thousands and thousands of years, they have always been vicious parasites, who have always owned slaves and subjects. They have always seen as the world, all resources, human, animals and nature as theirs to take and use, with any means necessary. This is the secret why for now Satan has been victorious against God.
American and british have always hugely benefited from a strong state, from their slaves and subjects. They are afraid that they will soon loose the petro-dollar, FED/Bank of England and their slaves will finally fight legally against the american and british enemy, who has always sucked life out from them and from their backs. American and british couldnt never do anything on their own.
https://youtube.com/shorts/FX2CsBDTFd4
Take a look how american and british have continuously robbed money and wealth from everybody elses backs and then they call the money, wealth and resources that they robbed from others as THEIR money. “Oh my God, our money is being wasted.”. What your money? Your money? The money you robbed with all of your crimes, murders, terrorism etc?
Like Donald Trump said it: Give us the oil. The oil is ours. Give us the oil. This is exactly the same that these parasites have done for thousands and thousands of years and they still cant live on their own without parasiting off from backs of others and other peoples work. These animals do not even know what work is.
Very valuable post. Thank you.
It seems that a similar ploy is being attempted in France by ((François Hollande)).
Appealing to Generation 68 Useful Idiots, depraved perverts etc
Israel must survive at any cost !!
And if this doesn’t work, there’s Marine’s ((boyfriend)).
plus ça change (plus c’est la même chose).
Thanks … very well explained without oversimplification (he left out that
the iron (Krivoj Rog, the Zezi´s birthplace) and the manganese (Nikopol,
just north of the Zaporozhskaya NPP) are on the right bank of the Dniepr;
the region is of little value unless together with the coal of the Donbass and
the Russian market)
– The Chinese have little use for coal and salt (which is what´s currently under
Russian control), and iron ore they have more close by in Afghanistan.
– His last point was interesting; Russian milbloggers have – disapprovingly – noted
the Ruskies do not attack the mines (if you want to disrupt electricity closing up
a mine is easier and works better than anything short of total destruction of the TPPs,
and it is much easier to remedy afterwards)
It seems the Kremlin has “investments” (cough cough) too 😁
The Europeans didn’t mind living in a managerial technocracy. They’d lived in worse during WW II.
The US gained assent for its suzerainty of Europe by promising and delivering on three items:
1) No nuclear war.
2) No more conventional war in Europe.
3) Moderate European prosperity.
Delivery of (2) has been broken by the US itself, which has involved Europe in a war with the Russian Federation.
Delivery of (3) has been broken by the US, partly by the Ukraine/Russian Federation conflict, and partly by mass immigration of populations hostile to European society. (Note: the US is now trying the same thing in the US.)
Delivery of (1) is being weakened by US disregard of Russian Federation nuclear doctrine and basic MAD strategy.
Long term, EU and the Russian Federation will merge. They are in a hostile world and have no choice. A Russian Federation / PRC union is unlikely to succeed simply because it involves shipping resources during the Arctic winter to Murmansk, then shipping them the rest of the way by rail. Rail costs about 10x the energy, and more in labor an capital, as current shipping routes. China might have cheap labor, but not cheap enough to compensate for rail costs or for two ports, one for summer use and one for winter use.
So, how does the US react to the creation of Eurasia, right out of 1984 ?
The basic political system in the US is domination by urban political machines, whose ancestry is Tammany Hall and similar organizations. This political system has kept its power by importing groups hostile to 1950 US society and supposedly in need of protection from it. Practitioners of something descended from 1950 US society are now down to at most 65% of the US population, and the basic political system (Uniparty) is importing a massively numerous group that is hostile to the groups practicing something like 1950 US society and supposedly in need of protection from it.
It seems that the basic political system in the US is trying to re-create a version of South Africa or Zambia in the United States.
The US political system is in incapable of maintaining the US suzerainty over Europe. It is incapable of expanding its suzerainty to cover the Russian Federation, the PRC, the Islamic countries, and the sub-Saharan African countries. Thus, the US political system is unable to provide livelihood to the current members of its domestic coalition. It appears to be unable to provide livelihood for the additional new group. Side effects of this relative poverty seem to include destabilization of existing urban governments — governments that are the foundation of the Uniparty’s control. Uniparty is tearing itself apart as you read this.
IMHO, the Uniparty is over (so to speak). Texas is now working with 5 other States on secession. New York has abandoned its legal system, and the consequent panic stricken rout of businesses will continue and accelerate. Other urban areas are not quite as badly off, but all lack the tax base to maintain their capital infrastructure. Federal funds come from seigniorage that depends on a vanishing US suzerainty. The only remaining question is how much damage Uniparty will do before it is renounced by its own constituencies.
IMHO, international trade will be greatly reduced. Food production will be greatly reduced. Mass starvation will occur, IMHO about a billion dead (give or take 50%).
Although I’ve seen speculations that the PRC could take the US West Coast, that does not seem to be realistic. The Asian powers that could project power (Japan, China, N and S Korea) have a resource deficit that they have yet to overcome. The obvious answer to that, conquest of resource areas, was tried by Pres. Bush and failed dramatically. Eastern powers would fare no better, whether fighting each other, fighting Islamic areas, or even in alliance (as all lack resources). PRC takeover of Taiwan would not alleviate PRC resource deficits, nor would it provide safe shipping routes for Taiwan manufactures, and it would kill Taiwan economic value as it has killed Hong Kong’s.
Again IHMO, the Eastern countries would be better off developing extraterrestrial resources. Trying to reprise the historical arc of Imperial Japan or even Imperial Germany — conquest, then insufficient resources to hold the conquest even with a 5X lethality for the individual soldier, is a sure loser.
However, extraterrestrial resources are well beyond most countries’ planning horizon, and are more likely to succeed if pursued by startup companies than if pursued by authoritarian governments. For an object lesson in that, consider NASA and the Boeing Starliner. Socialist governments and State industries are not good at innovation.
So we seem to be at the start of an historical epoch of turning inward, worldwide poverty and starvation, and probably of developing some form of political legitimacy that is not dominated urban political machines, but is at present otherwise undefined.
Who controls the Communist Party of China?
“… at least in the good old days they kept their destruction mostly to themselves…”
Wrong! Your very short sighted in your view of human history. Reality is that humanity, which has evolved in chaotic warfare since inception, should be reclassified as a war virus. It’s a war mold that covers every inch of this war planet from the hunter-gather tribes that warred on small scales to the rise of civilizations and organized armies the whole world over. War has been, is now and will forever be, the whole planet over. You can’t see this now? The horror is that humanity is not responsible for the warfare in which we are trapped, and thus cannot stop it either. War is beyond humanities control. Nation states will be warring until weapons advancement finally develops life ending systems for the whole species. We are however, a shallow, stupid species that fails to understand war cannot be stopped, and keeps this horrific charade going by continuing to bring children here. Each new birth will be born into one of the 200-odd nation states, and programmed to war against all the other nation states.
Why would Russia want to “merge” with EU dead weight? Europe is worthless and has nothing to offer Russia. Russia is shifting its attentions east and has zero to gain from propping up Euro parasites.
Evidence does not support this assertion. All major technological innovation has come from state industry and “socialist” government, even in the west. Satellites, rockets, internet, microchips, etc. All the result of state research.
It is controlled by the central committee. These are usually lifelong bureaucrats, public servants, or politicians who rise through the ranks of the party to gain leadership. It is not controlled by David Rockefeller type silver spoon fat cats.
https://www.forbes.com/2011/09/14/china-rich-lists-opinions-contributors-john-lee.html
There is so much BS wasting people’s time that I regard my tendency to scepticism and pedantry as helpful to many that I would like to help. And my pedantry notes that you are now referring to possible co-existence and not just peaceful unification. That’s a huge difference. I wouldn’t have made the comment I did if you had said that in the first place (though I might hav still pointed to the difference). You, and your approving commenter seem to ignore the extreme unlikelihood that unification with a CCP and dictator Xi ruled giant would be acceptable when, if only China doesn’t threaten invasion, peaceful co-existence is at least a necessar preliminary to unification which means that the government elected by vast numbers of people who know and care little about Taiwan holds sway over the Taiwanese. Just think it through.
See my reply to the comment of “xyzxy” (pronounced George).
This only provides evidence for what I wrote. Individuals who acquire a certain amount of wealth in China are compelled to join the communist party, so that they (and their wealth) can be controlled and directed for the good of the state. It is the opposite of how things work in the west.
The good of the state and the people who control it, and those people are rich and powerful because they are the ones who control the state?
American and british have always supported a strong state, because a state or especially an empire can do anything without ever carrying consequences of anything. American and british can kill, terrorize and rob anybody with a strong state and with an empire and nobody can do anything.
But their military is also just a myth. If their victims have weapons and will, they can crush the american and british enemy and drive it out from the lands american and british have invaded. Many nations have shown many times how they can drive out the american and british enemy from their lands and send these primitive, aggressive animals back.
Yep. The jews — for example, the Chicago outfit which produced the Obango administration — are kike cutthroats. And Joe “I am a Zionist” O’Biden was Obango’s handler. They all add up to Big Brother.
But “1950’s US society” was and is comprised of Angloids, who themselves were products of the Cousinhood and the Crown, which brought us WW1 and WW2, using its Bolshevik wing to bait Germany.
Is there a worse species on the face of the earth than the Hebroid-Angloid combo? Maybe. The Hebroid-Angloid-Negroid combo.
So we’re back to the jew. .
But Jesus Christ can fix the kike — permanently.
Video Link
Short answer:
European engineering/manufacturing in some areas is the best in the world. Russian engineering/manufacturing is not. European resources are largely used up. Russian resources are not. If European states became junior members of the Russian Federation, then the Russian Federation could keep the three promises that the US has broken, and the Russian Federation would have access to European engineering. The expanded Russian Federation would have an excellent chance of survival, which neither has alone. The absorbed junior partners would have their only chance of survival after US misrule and “social engineering”.
Satellites: spin-off from ICBM development. Devolved into a propaganda/intelligence collection contest. US Federal government forbade commercial satellite development for several decades after Sputnik, and in fact forbade launching Earth satellites during the IGCY, ~1957 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Geophysical_Year .
Rockets: Initial work on liquid fueled rockets done by Goddard, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_H._Goddard
internet: Made economically possible by development of the integrated circuit. Developed as ARPANET to survive a nuclear war. There were many precursor systems, and ARPANET was fairly straightforward engineering.
Microchips: Integrated solid state circuits. Commercial development, largely by Intel. Intel was a “spin-off” from Bell Labs work on solid state components.
Generally speaking, government sponsored R&D labs have been spectacularly unproductive. One seeming exception is Jet Propulsion Laboratories, which has done almost unbelievably good work. I suspect that this good work was permitted precisely because it has no application here on Earth, and was politically important in that it gave the impression that government was sponsoring technical advances.
For an example of an unproductive laboratory, you might consider Lawrence Livermore and Los Alamos. I’ve visited both, and both are, let’s say, not intellectual hotbeds and technologically stagnant. Generally speaking, the Federal Government tends to buy gadgets, operational equipment. Once the Federal specs are satisfied, the R&D effort is halted and the R&D team dispersed, even if the field has spectacular applications. One example of this was adaptive optics, which was taken up by the university astronomy community after DoD stopped all funding for further adaptive optics development.
One famous example of of the “stop development” was nuclear applications. Once the US federal government had a working H bomb and a working nuclear submarine reactor, further development (pebble reactor, thorium reactor, even depleted rod fuel storage) was halted.
In fact, the shutdown of fabulously productive industrial laboratories, and the later Biosphere shutdown, showed that the US federal government was fundamentally opposed to the sort of industrial innovation that caused what Schumpeter called “creative destruction”, which is the obsolescence of existing industry by more efficient industry. Government as it is now responds to present businesses, not to future businesses, and it tried to shut down the future business to save the then present business For quite some time, the US had an Office of Technology Assessment that had veto power over any innovation in the US more radical than a change in advertising logo.
Consider Space-X as an example of innovation. NASA was originally charged with carrying USAF to low earth orbit (LEO). NASA responded with the horribly engineered Space Shuttle, which (a) was extremely dangerous {with 1 out each 67 missions ended with loss of vehicle and crew} and (b) required its oxygen/hydrogen engines to operate at well over 100% to launch USAF payloads, hence to require complete engine teardown and rebuild after every flight. This increased space access costs to a prohibitive level. [1]
And that’s why you have Space-X. DoD needed its satellites launched at a much lower cost, and Space-X was finally chosen for that role after Boeing and NASA had failed on at least two National Launch Systems.
So — much as it would like to play the role of great provider and innovator — the US federal government is neither. It suppresses innovation. That is one reason that US urban areas are obsolete, while Singapore (which had to adapt or die) is thriving. In fact, the COVID affair, the “green energy” affair, and the “electric car” affair suggest that the US federal government is engaged in massive fraud in anything having to do with “science” and engineering and “technology”, which loosely means “magic equipment that you don’t understand”.
The Europeans didn’t mind living in a managerial technocracy. They’d lived in worse during WW II.
The US gained assent for its suzerainty of Europe by promising and delivering on three items:
1) No nuclear war.
2) No more conventional war in Europe.
3) Moderate European prosperity.
Delivery of (2) has been broken by the US itself, which has involved Europe in a war with the Russian Federation.
Delivery of (3) has been broken by the US, partly by the Ukraine/Russian Federation conflict, and partly by mass immigration of populations hostile to European society. (Note: the US is now trying the same thing in the US.)
Delivery of (1) is being weakened by US disregard of Russian Federation nuclear doctrine and basic MAD strategy.
Long term, EU and the Russian Federation will merge. They are in a hostile world and have no choice. A Russian Federation / PRC union is unlikely to succeed simply because it involves shipping resources during the Arctic winter to Murmansk, then shipping them the rest of the way by rail. Rail costs about 10x the energy, and more in labor an capital, as current shipping routes. China might have cheap labor, but not cheap enough to compensate for rail costs or for two ports, one for summer use and one for winter use.
So, how does the US react to the creation of Eurasia, right out of 1984 ?
The basic political system in the US is domination by urban political machines, whose ancestry is Tammany Hall and similar organizations. This political system has kept its power by importing groups hostile to 1950 US society and supposedly in need of protection from it. Practitioners of something descended from 1950 US society are now down to at most 65% of the US population, and the basic political system (Uniparty) is importing a massively numerous group that is hostile to the groups practicing something like 1950 US society and supposedly in need of protection from it.
It seems that the basic political system in the US is trying to re-create a version of South Africa or Zambia in the United States.
The US political system is in incapable of maintaining the US suzerainty over Europe. It is incapable of expanding its suzerainty to cover the Russian Federation, the PRC, the Islamic countries, and the sub-Saharan African countries. Thus, the US political system is unable to provide livelihood to the current members of its domestic coalition. It appears to be unable to provide livelihood for the additional new group. Side effects of this relative poverty seem to include destabilization of existing urban governments — governments that are the foundation of the Uniparty’s control. Uniparty is tearing itself apart as you read this.
IMHO, the Uniparty is over (so to speak). Texas is now working with 5 other States on secession. New York has abandoned its legal system, and the consequent panic stricken rout of businesses will continue and accelerate. Other urban areas are not quite as badly off, but all lack the tax base to maintain their capital infrastructure. Federal funds come from seigniorage that depends on a vanishing US suzerainty. The only remaining question is how much damage Uniparty will do before it is renounced by its own constituencies.
IMHO, international trade will be greatly reduced. Food production will be greatly reduced. Mass starvation will occur, IMHO about a billion dead (give or take 50%).
Although I’ve seen speculations that the PRC could take the US West Coast, that does not seem to be realistic. The Asian powers that could project power (Japan, China, N and S Korea) have a resource deficit that they have yet to overcome. The obvious answer to that, conquest of resource areas, was tried by Pres. Bush and failed dramatically. Eastern powers would fare no better, whether fighting each other, fighting Islamic areas, or even in alliance (as all lack resources). PRC takeover of Taiwan would not alleviate PRC resource deficits, nor would it provide safe shipping routes for Taiwan manufactures, and it would kill Taiwan economic value as it has killed Hong Kong’s.
Again IMHO, the Eastern countries would be better off developing extraterrestrial resources. Trying to reprise the historical arc of Imperial Japan or even Imperial Germany — conquest, then insufficient resources to hold the conquest even with a 5X lethality for the individual soldier, is a sure loser.
However, extraterrestrial resources are well beyond most countries’ planning horizon (although the PRC is working in that area), and most initiatives in that area are more likely to succeed if pursued by startup companies than if pursued by authoritarian governments. For an object lesson in that, consider NASA and the Boeing Starliner. Socialist governments and State industries are not good at innovation.
So we seem to be at the start of an historical epoch of turning inward, worldwide poverty and starvation, and probably of developing some form of political legitimacy that is not dominated urban political machines, but is at present otherwise undefined.
False. European engineering is mediocre, and Russia has always been superior in most areas. Asia (including Russia) is certainly superior to Europe currently. Russia will continue to grow closer to Asia, while distancing itself from dying Europe. Europe will continue to just become New Africa and will return to being a worthless appendage that happens to be attached to Asia, as it had been for most of human history.
False. Almost all development of this technology has been accomplished with public research. Intel just packages, markets, and extracts IP rents from technology that was developed years or even decades prior in public research.
SpaceX wouldn’t exist without public funding.
Yet your own post is almost entirely examples of the opposite.
Singapore is “thriving” because it is a intermediary between east and west, not for any other reason. As American empire expires, the niche that Singapore occupies will no longer exist and Singapore will atrophy.
There is no indication that the US federal government “would like to play the role of great provider and innovator” (yet public research remains the backbone of all innovation regardless). It is very clearly the opposite, that the US federal government is geared towards facilitating private rent extraction off of public research.
No. This is a misrepresentation. As I have said, most are lifelong bureaucrats or politicians. You can look at the CPC standing committee’s seven members and see that they are not Rockefeller-type financial oligarchs. The distinction that I am trying to make is that, in China, the state has dominance over capital, whereas the relationship is the opposite in the west. you could just as easily note similarities between feudalism and bourgeois capitalism, but these similarities are also superficial and arise only from taking an overly abstract view and failing to make distinctions.
Sounds like you don’t get the basic that the ROC and the PROC are the natural consequence of a yet to be settled Chinese civil war.
BTW, the US is an exception among most powers which are “a people” looking to make a nation among other nations. In comparsion, the US is a nation still looking to have or to become a people.
The ROC and the PROC are naturally one nation of one people. This is also what stipulated in their Constitutions.
Talking about Democracy and Dictatorship, China is more democratic than America, say the people
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2020-06-26/which-nations-are-democracies-some-citizens-might-disagree
What I’m saying is that it’s a small group of oligarchs/”representatives”/managers running the government/corporations/the economy “on behalf of” the people.
You are obviously using “natural” to mean “almost inevitably” or “logical” which are, both, clearly wrong if meant to provide a defence of the military threat China projects at Taiwan.
Whatever. Whether one uses “natural” or “logical” makes no different. The ROC and the PROC are the two sides of one China of one Chinese people. The two political entities are the results of the yet to be settled Chinese Civil War. Needless to say, most Chinese people NATURALLY want to see peaceful re-unification. But if third party want to see China split for whatever reason, military unification would be the only way to finish the Chinese Civil War.
Semantics aside, may be you are more eager to accuse China of imaginary threat against an imaginary country called “Taiwan.”
Independent countries NATURALLY have borders delimiting one from its neighbors. Given the ONE CHINA of ONE PEOPLE reality regarding the ROC and the PROC, there is no border between the two political entities. It is the PROC’s rights and responsibility to guide the whole of China per its constitution, including the right to carry out military exercises. Similarly, it is the ROC’s right and responsibility to guide the whole of China per its constitution, if it chooses to.
p.s. Please take a look of the ROC Constitution which include a map indicating what people are ROC citizen/people.
I suppose you might be an American given your enthusiasm for doing (some of the) things provided for in constititions!
No need to accuse anyone of anything. China is undeniably threatening to attack and take over Taiwan by force. How can you possibly deny that when Xi and the CCP arecbacking words to that effect with aircraft flights of a dangerous kind close to Taiwan.?
Again, it is Chinese government’s responsibility to unify China i.e. mianland + Taiwan and islands. NATURAL for China to want peaceful unification. If interfered, military unification would be INEVITABLE and LOGICAL.
Which part of Homo Sapiens 300,000 years or so do you focus on when deriving or defining your notion of “natural”?
And, as to “logical” what are the premises of the logical reasoning you rely on for your confident views?
As for INEVITABLE [sic] that needs explaining too. So Si Jin Ping isn’t strong enough, perhaps, to avoid killing millions of Han people?
Chinee construction goes nuts
Don’t know what you mean.
Would you please flesh up what kind of construction goes nuts in what way.
In case you want an example, Alastair Crooke’s first paragraph provides an excellent example:
Crook likes to demean the Afrikaner, since being an agent of the Crown he has to continue to genocide which the filthy Brits enacted against the Boers in 2. Boer war. My family was directly affected by this genocide. He is a lying snake which is why I stopped listening to him on Judge Naps Show. Agents like him have no business commenting on the Israeli genocide in Palestine when he is not prepared to confess to the British genocide against the Boers, which started in the 2nd Boer war and continues to this day. And yeah, crook (intentional misspelling) would know something about genocide