The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewAndrew Anglin Archive
Is the Ukraine Getting Thrown Under the Bus or What?
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
List of Bookmarks

It’s so funny that after a year, someone is forcing all of these international human rights organizations to come out and talking about the atrocities happening in the Ukraine.

RT:

The Ukrainian military injured scores of civilians when it fired thousands of illegal mines across the city of Izium last year, Human Rights Watch (HRW) has alleged. The mines, similar to those allegedly used by Ukraine against civilians in Donetsk, were found near schools and kindergartens.

The mines were fired into the city by rocket while it was occupied by Russian forces between April and September of last year, the NGO said in a report published on Tuesday. Dispersed hundreds at a time, the Soviet-era PFM mines are distinctively butterfly- or petal-shaped devices and are designed to maim rather than kill those unfortunate enough to step on them or pick them up.

The HRW team entered the city following Russia’s withdrawal in mid-September and found the mines in nine locations, including a school, and kindergarten, and a hospital.

Healthcare workers said that more than 50 civilians, including at least five children, were wounded by the mines. Around half of the injuries led to amputations of the foot or lower leg. At least one death was recorded, that of an elderly man who picked up one of the devices in his yard. However, investigators could not rule out other factors in the man’s death.

Some of the mines were fitted with timed fuses, and would explode without warning up to three days after being dispersed.

According to more than 100 residents, Russian forces attempted to warn locals of the danger posed by the Ukrainian mines, cleared some of the explosives, and transported victims to Russia for treatment. Once the Russians left Izium, demining duties were reportedly carried out by Ukrainian troops.

Use of such antipersonnel mines is prohibited under the 1997 Mine Ban Treaty, to which Ukraine is a signatory. The US and Russia are not parties to the treaty.

So:

  • Is it the rank and file of HRW that were finally able to force the leadership to acknowledge atrocities?
  • Or is this coming out on purpose as part of a plan to roll back this lunatic war?

It’s unclear, but it would fit into the perception that the US is preparing to start the big wind-down.

There are all kinds of moving parts here, and different people are coming up with different narratives. Yesterday, I heard Tucker Carlson say World War III is a definite and I heard most of the panel on All-In agree that the US appears to be maneuvering for a negotiated settlement.

What I’ve said is that I think a wind-down is probably the likeliest thing – especially after that RAND report that said the US is just burning resources that puts it in a worse place in terms of war with the Chinese.

I think the amount of tanks being sent, and what appears to be a really muddled program for servicing them, shows wavering commitment.

Meanwhile, Boris Johnson coming to America looks to me like an act of desperation by the pro-war forces. He’s still well-liked. Sending him in is a power-play that would only be necessary if serious doubt is festering.

Frankly, if I was a neocon, I would be demanding we pivot to China. RAND is right that there is zero to gain from continuing the war on Russia. The government is not going to collapse. That was the pitch: “we can do this quick with a small NATO force and some sanctions and Putin will be run out of office.” It was logical to give up when it was made clear that wasn’t happening. But there is mission creep and there is extreme Jewish hatred for Russians.

“Americans against Russia” hahahahahahaha
“Americans against Russia” hahahahahahaha

If they do a negotiated settlement, they can claim victory. Putin would probably at this point allow the Ukraine rump state to join NATO, as long as he got everything east of the river (including presumably Kharkov and Sumy). Americans are so stupid and fat they will believe it was a big victory, and resources can then go into planning this war with the Chinese.

A war with China is actually popular. Tucker Carlson supports it. I heard him last week say “well, we don’t actually want a war with China though,” but that was a response to me calling him out. He has Marco Rubio on to talk about China, he absolutely supports a war with China, the entire Ron DeSantis wing supports a war with China. They want to bring back the 1980s with China instead of Russia. They can actually organize people around hatred of China, whereas with Russia it’s not working.

But again: this would all assume these people can act rationally in their own interests, which has proved wrong before. So maybe they’re going to keep pushing. I don’t know and I’m not making a prediction. Maybe it’s 60-40 in favor of a pivot, but at this point we’re reading tea leaves.

Here’s how you’ll know: if they sent the fighter jets, they’re escalating. If they waver on that, we’re looking at a rollback.

Exciting times!

(Republished from The Daily Stormer by permission of author or representative)
 
The China/America Series
Hide 75 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Anonymous[275] • Disclaimer says:

    As has been said about Trump’s presidency— that it forced the masks to drop and Deep State and their perfidious POS servants to expose themselves— same with this Ukraine conflict. We have seen not only why Ukraine must be ended but what pathetic foaming-at-the-mouth losers the UK, Poland, Latvia, Estonia, and Lithuania are. But especially the UK and Poland. All these countries need to be consigned to the ash-bin of history.

    This will all be a revealing and helpful lesson to China for the future when they will need to decide which countries must be euthanized for the salvation of civilization.

    • Thanks: CelestiaQuesta
  2. mijj says:

    time for the US Spiritual/Political leaders to focus on finding ways to be humilated by China.

    • LOL: Bro43rd
  3. JimmyS says:

    It may or may not have something to do with:

    “European officials are accusing the US of making war profits from the conflict, especially in the energy and defence sectors.

    All the while, they say, Europe is suffering.”

    “One senior official saying, “if you look soberly, the country most profiting from this war is the US because they are selling more [natural] gas at higher prices, and because they are selling more weapons.”

    EU’s chief diplomat, Josep Borrell, has called on Washington to respond to Europe’s concerns and realise that public opinion is shifting in many EU countries.

    French President Emmanuel Macron, frustrated at the way President Biden has ignored the impact of his domestic economic policies on NATO allies, has led the charge, arguing that high US gas prices – four times more than Americans pay at home.

    Full Article
    https://www.skynews.com.au/insights-and-analysis/war-in-ukraine-a-lucrative-cash-cow-for-the-us-merchants-of-death-and-history-shows-us-why-we-should-expect-little-else/news-story/f0debc9a6a14606a4dfb311ccc2b81b5

    • Agree: Dieter Kief
  4. Putin will never allow even a rump, landlocked Uraine to join NATO. And in the light of the revelations by Angela Merkel and François Holland that they entered into the Minsk Accords with their fingers crossed, the Russian leadership has no reason to have any confidence in a settlement negotiated with the West. The terms of the settlement will be dictated by Russia after victory on the battlefield.

    War with China is more popular because it would be more of an air and naval campaign, but it is every bit as insane as the West’s participation in the Ukraine war, and the stakes are, in some respects, larger. China would undoubtedly target U.S. carriers, and the capabilities of shore-based missiles are sufficient that there’s a good chance that China could sink or severely damage a carrier. Such a loss would be a severe blow to American prestige. (The real coup for the Chinese would be to sink a nuclear fast attack submarine, thus forcing the U.S. to restrict any submarine campaign it contemplated.)

    Something has gone horribly wrong with the leadership of the United States and its puppets in western Europe.

  5. Levtraro says:
    @Diversity Heretic

    Interesting speculations. But I think a war over Taiwan will develop in the same manner as the war over the Ukraine: the Taiwanese will fight and die for some time, and the USA + attachments will limit themselves to provide spiritual (i.e. propaganda), finantial and military support. The latter will happen by using the other side of the island, and the Chinese will refrain from sinking US ships as long as the US Navy limits itself to providing support. Half-hearted measures is the way of mediocre people and the most defining feature of Western leaders is mediocrity.

    • Replies: @Anon
  6. Anon[256] • Disclaimer says: • Website
    @Diversity Heretic

    Moscow‘s War Aims were announced in the comprehensive peace treaty offered in Dec 2021.

    It’s unlikely Moscow will accept anything less.

  7. Jim H says:

    “Americans against Russia” hahahahahahaha — Andrew Anglin, photo caption

    Three hook-nosed impostors, obscuring all but the starry canton of their occupied nation’s flag in the background.

    Save this photo for the Caucasian Holocaust Museum.

    • Replies: @Derer
  8. @Diversity Heretic

    You are so totally right. No, Pooty Poot will not allow a rump Ukraine to join NATO. Even way back when, he was never opposed to them (a complete Ukraine) joining the EU, but not NATO. The possibility of Poland regaining Western Ukraine is interesting. A rump Ukraine will be even more of a basket case than the post-Soviet entity that came into being in the early 1990s. The only way it could be locally viable is as a province of Poland – as long as Poland is not destroyed in this current debacle. As far as Ukraine being thrown under the bus, I would say the process is only beginning. Lots of light bulbs are going off, but pride by some military and state department elements and a lot of Jewish chutzpah needs to be stamped out. Do you think people like Victoria Nuland want to see all her efforts go down the drain? The RAND report is amazingly informative in that it brings to light a very revealing mindset that just recently is being exposed. The sacrifice of Ukraine in order for the US to fight the Chinese is something that the political class – especially the neocons, have been very well aware of, but not the regular Joe. Whenever this Ukrainian steppe fire gets extinguished (hopefully soon) and Pooty Poot gets more or less what he wants, the pivot to China is going to take some time. Don’t you think the Chinese have been preparing? The pivot to an Asian war (with the US much more directly involved militarily, not by proxy) is going to take time, unless some mad hatter decides to chimp out and start bombing Chinese ships off of Taiwan.

  9. We’re already in WW3, but most people are oblivious to it. WW2 started for the US well before December 1941, and precisely because of the sanctions and chicanery FDR played with the Japanese and Germans.

    The biggest difference here is that the Russians are largely self-sufficient in strategic natural resources. I would liken the US here to Germany in 1939: Confident they can take their adversaries on despite having less industrial capacity and resource base to get the job done.

    • Replies: @Observator
  10. RAND is right that there is zero to gain from continuing the war on Russia. The government is not going to collapse. That was the pitch: “we can do this quick with a small NATO force and some sanctions and Putin will be run out of office.” It was logical to give up when it was made clear that wasn’t happening.

    It’s the flip side of the early Russian attempt at a fast taking of Kiev in the hope of causing the Kiev regime to collapse within the framework of the original SMO. Once that failed the Russians pulled back and resorted to mobilization and the slow meat grinder approach, which will engulf Kiev and the western Borderlands in due time.

    But it’s highly doubtful the neocons are rational enough to recognize a lost cause when they have such a rabid ideological and emotional investment in it.

    • Replies: @Emslander
  11. Notsofast says:

    exit strategy: “hey, wait a minute, these guys are a bunch of nazi thugs, why didn’t anyone tell us? oh my god and to think we helped them. that’s it, we’re outta here!”.

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    , @nokangaroos
  12. Sanctions and no-fly zones imposed on sovereign countries used to be how the US got ‘respect’ in tha’ hood. The US could boot countries from the Olympics, seize their property, threaten their borders, eliminate their leaders, or invade them with total disregard for international law.

    When Syria didn’t fall, the world took notice. When the US military ran from Afghanistan with their tails between their legs, the world took notice.

    Then Biden said the Russian ruble would be rubble, and his bluff was called. Respect for the US died in a Ukrainian trench. The Nordstream crime sealed it.

    US regime posturing just looks like the delusions of a lunatic now.

    • Replies: @katesisco
    , @Anon
    , @Anonymous
  13. Wokechoke says:
    @Notsofast

    It’s an obvious exit strategy. Just have one of the Ukie nutcases fulfill a line item on the DeathList. “Wait they were always assassins and terrorists?”

  14. xyzxy says:

    I’m trying to understand reasons Americans might want to go to war with China. So far, from reading the blogs and comments, I’ve come across the following, which certainly breaks it down in a way any true American can understand:

    1) Junk from China is worthless. I got a fifty-year old hammer I bought from Sears, and it still works.

    2) Serves ‘em right for that there Chinee Virus that got away from them in Woo Han.

    3) Those people eat dogs. How can anyone eat a dog? My dog eats at my dinner table, and is my best friend.

    4) I’m tired of watching slim, petite, and modest Asian women with our men. They should appreciate an American woman’s beauty. Why should I act feminine? That’s sexism. So what if I want to get drunk, party down and screw blacks? My body, My choice. I’m proud of my tats, nose ring and slutty appearance. And you better not body shame me because I’m fat. Asian women are for pedophiles, anyway.

    5) Chinese are stealing our jobs. They stole everything from us and it’s time to get it back.

    6) Tik Tok is spying on our kids. Do you want China spying on our kids?

    7) Xiden is controlled by China.

    8) Taiwan is our greatest ally. They’ve always been our greatest ally. Right after Israel, of course.

  15. KA says:

    1-US President Biden declared on Wednesday that “the United States will be sending 31 Abrams tanks to Ukraine”.

    In March 2022 he compared the idea of sending ‘offensive equipment’ for Ukraine to “World War 3”.

    https://dailycaller.com/2023/01/26/flashback-biden-abrams-tanks-ukraine-wwiii-ukraine/

    2-FORMER DEFENSE MINISTER OF UK SAYS NATO FORCES MAY NEED TO FACE RUSSIA ON THE GROUND– https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/former-uk-defense-minister-says-nato-may-need-send-ground-forces-ukraine

    A clear deliberate calibration is at work .West doesn’t t want Uki strike Russia deeper or try do anything over Crimea but wants Uki stay in the fight as long as possible while it offers hopes of eventual victory . As long as Zelensky or the ex defense minister feels safe ,moneyed and well heeled ,there is no downside .

    • Replies: @pyrrhus
  16. Anon[111] • Disclaimer says:
    @Levtraro

    @Levtraro, why would the Taiwanese fight and die for America? Half of Taiwan’s population have relatives in China. Unless of course they are fanatical about anal sex?

    • Replies: @unzrocks
    , @Levtraro
  17. What caused the Saudis to let the US Army occupy their country since 1991? It was the US provoking Saddam Hussein to invade Kuwait. This same thing is being played out with Russia now playing the role of Iraq and Ukraine playing the role of Kuwait. Except the US is using Ukraine like it did Kuwait to build a huge weapons, narcotics and sex slave base bordering Russia

    The main difference now is that the Jews, Niggers and Fags that write the media disinfo narratives here in 2023 actually kinda liked Saddam. They like Saddam because he badmouthed white guys in the US that they happened to hate also. They don’t kinda like Putin. At all. Putin hates White supremacists even more than every Jew, Fag, Nigger lawyer, yet he still gets no love from them.

    Putin appears to like them though. Likes them enough to not level every military production factory in the US. The brainwashing of Putin and the Chinese must be very powerful that they continue to abide by rules of engagement that allow hitting the tanks and sinking ships, but not the tiny few places in the west they are constructed.

    Shitlib intersectional devil cultists better hope they never lose those legacy arms factories the White man built. Joe won’t have any F-15s to bomb White people or F-16s to bomb Russia.

    • LOL: 36 ulster
  18. Emslander says:
    @Flying Dutchman

    But it’s highly doubtful the neocons are rational enough to recognize a lost cause when they have such a rabid ideological and emotional investment in it.

    Russia will want to bring its historical center back under the flag. Kiev is Russia. Odessa is Russia. Lviv is Russia. Most of current Poland was long part of Russia. All efforts to re-unite the Russian homeland will continue, probably through this century.

    This century will see the USA broken into about ten mini-homelands, ripe for reunification in the next century under nationalist authoritarian leadership.

  19. Alrenous says: • Website

    The Biden crime family still wants to try to rescue Hunter et al’s corrupt businesses in Ukraine, as without that money stream they have nothing. It’s existential for them, so they’re more than willing to spend every last dollar of your money to try to achieve this.
    The rest of the American empire is either indifferent to the issue or actively hostile to the Bidens. I said early on it was started either due to lack of Biden crime family leadership or by their rivals deliberately goading them into making a mistake.

    The rivals now believe the mistake has run its course and will allow it wind down. Possibly even impeach Biden and seize everything the Biden crime family used to have, less the Ukraine holdings.

    Congratulations Germany, on getting absolutely wrecked due to petty American infighting.

    I personally believe America doesn’t have anything remotely resembling the balls necessary to start a kinetic spat with China. It won’t even approach Russia except through a proxy. It will talk big, maybe do some sanctions here and there, then find a great excuse for dropping the issue.

  20. Republic says:
    @Diversity Heretic

    China would undoubtedly target U.S. carriers
    It is highly likely

  21. Avery says:

    {….these international human rights organizations…..} [Anglin]

    All these Western so-called “human rights” organizations are propaganda and disinformation outlets for NATO/US/GloboSorosa intelligence agencies.

    They change their tune on orders from their paymasters.
    To wit: how many times have these cretins publicized the war crimes by the GloboWest (KSA) against the Houthi ?

    But you are right: the fact that the chorus is now ragging on the Ukis is bad news for LGBTQ++ Zelensky and his/her/they gang.

    • Replies: @Not Important
  22. @xyzxy

    To be honest Tiktok is utter garbage, but you don’t need to go to war over it, just ban it like India did, the fact no one else did is that it of course serves the (((globalists))) interest even if it serves China’s interest too.

  23. Avery says:

    {If they do a negotiated settlement, they can claim victory. Putin would probably at this point allow the Ukraine rump state to join NATO, as long as he got everything east of the river (including presumably Kharkov and Sumy).} [Anglin]

    Highly unlikely.

    Both Col. Macgregor and Maj. Ritter say that at this stage, and with the publicity of Western leaders’ treachery re Minks agreements, it is highly unlikely and irrational for Russians to accept anything short of total capitulation.

    And according to many, Russian nationalists are quite unhappy with Putin’s measured approach to Ukraine: they want a scorched earth attack all the way to the Polish border.

    Any little piece of Ukraine that is left to join NATO will still be an existential thereat to Russia. Don’t know how they are going to solve that riddle, but they can’t allow any NATO presence in whatever is left of Ukraine.

    • Agree: inspector general
  24. Business executives sometimes use management consultants, not to learn something they don’t know, but to give cover for decisions they want to make, like saving costs by firing 5000 employees.
    Similarly, the military brass use think tanks, like RAND, for cover by publishing papers whose outcomes the military brass in fact want. So, RAND is putting out there what they have been briefed to put out there.
    HRW is also a well known shill and agent of the US deep state. Perhaps they have also been briefed from within the state apparatus to start the negative PR.

    • Agree: Kratoklastes
  25. katesisco says:
    @beavertales

    I am wondering if this hand is about played out?
    I am wondering if the outdated armament stored by NATO is about exhausted?
    I am wondering if the West has already gathered up Ukrainian land ownership?
    I am wondering if overnight acceptance of Ukraine into the EU is the agenda?
    I am wondering if the evicted Ukrainians will have any land to return to?
    I am wondering if the US private equity funds are about to collapse?
    I am wondering who will be the largest land owner in the Ukraine?
    I am wondering if this hand is about played out?

  26. unzrocks says:
    @Anon

    Why would the Germans or Europeans sanction Russia in the interest of the US?
    Why would Japan and South Korea arm themselves in a preparation showdown to contain China in the interest of the US?
    Why would Taiwan be purchasing billions of dollars worth of weapons from the US? When the wisest decision would be to maintain the status quo and not waste money on armaments.
    Why would the Ukrainians want to join a hostile and expensive military pact like NATO or had the coup in the interest of the US? When the wisest decision would be to remain neutral and trade / do business with everyone.

    Notice everything being played out only benefits one country, and that’s the US. NO one else benefits from this.

    The answer in a nutshell? The leaders are dumb as heck and are easily bribed and bought for. The leaders do not have to suffer for their actions, only the underlings will suffer. Who’s behind all of this pulling the strings? It’s the US and the UK 101, divide and conquer. The US never fights peer rivals directly. They let the foreign minions do most of the fighting and dying.

    US became a regional power in WW1 and the superpower in WW2 because the rest of the world were fighting and destroying each other while the US is safe and sound thousands of miles away where nothing is being destroyed.

    • Replies: @Pat Kittle
  27. George 1 says:

    Putin should impose another condition for ceasing of hostilities. Benjamin Netanyahu should be made to personally bring Victoria Nuland on a leash and in shackles to the center of the city of Donetsk. There he will present her to General Surovikin and the Russian authorities for trial as a war criminal.

    Anthony Blinken, Boris Johnson, John Bolton, Linsey Graham, David Petraeus, the entire CNN management and most of FOX news management, the Rothchilds, Soros, Schwab and all of the other chicken hawks in and out of governments in the west who pushed this murderous course of action can either go with Nuland or commit suicide in public.

    The list is not complete. A complete accounting will take a little time.

    • Agree: acementhead
    • Thanks: Pat Kittle
    • Replies: @Notsofast
  28. King Dollar is on his death bed. Therefore psychopathic demonic imperial Washington is doomed.

  29. @Emslander

    Russia will want to bring its historical center back under the flag. Kiev is Russia. Odessa is Russia. Lviv is Russia. Most of current Poland was long part of Russia. All efforts to re-unite the Russian homeland will continue, probably through this century.

    I doubt they’d want to rule Poles again. But if the hohols persist in genociding themselves and leave even Galicia as empty space, the Russians ought to take it themselves and not let the Poles have it.

    Of course the way things are going Poland is going to force the Russians to launch a military-technical operation there too. In that case the Russians would have to take control of them. The Baltics too.

    This century will see the USA broken into about ten mini-homelands, ripe for reunification in the next century under nationalist authoritarian leadership.

    Canada too. Some of those mini-homelands such as the Great Lakes region or the Pacific Northwest naturally, organically straddle the temporary international border.

    • Replies: @Bro43rd
  30. Bro43rd says:

    The answer to the title question is yes of course because it already happened. The real question is cui bono?

  31. Bro43rd says:
    @Flying Dutchman

    An excellent first step then taken to its logical conclusion, 8 Billion Sovereigns voluntarily cooperating.

  32. @Diversity Heretic

    Something has gone horribly wrong with the leadership of the United States and its puppets in western Europe.

    What are you talking about? Everything is going according to plan — The Eternal Jew

  33. @Avery

    “human rights” = jewish nonsense.

    • Agree: anonymouseperson
  34. @unzrocks

    US became a regional power in WW1 and the superpower in WW2 because the rest of the world were fighting and destroying each other while the US is safe and sound thousands of miles away where nothing is being destroyed.

    Your Commenting History pretends the US acts as an independent nation.

    Could your purpose here, “unzrocks,” be to deflect attention away from Jewish control of the US?

    • Replies: @unzrocks
  35. unzrocks says:
    @Pat Kittle

    Well, what you state as the Jewish control of the US is correct. They have controlled the international banking system and dominated it for the past 500 years starting with the Dutch empire (the Rothschild). The Federal Reserve Bank was created and owed by them. So the Jews control the money creation and supply of the collective west the past 500 years and if you control the money supply, you control these countries. SO yes, you are correct in that the US is dominated and ruled by Jews who want total global domination.

    • Replies: @Pat Kittle
  36. @unzrocks

    …US is dominated and ruled by Jews who want total global domination.

    That’s a refreshing acknowledgement of reality, sadly missing in your commentary until now.

    • Agree: werpor
  37. The above pic of (((Schumer the Nose, Fat Jewy, Anal Schitt)))’ three Jews from a den of thieves representing the synagogue of Satan, is a prime representation of what’s wrong with US and the world.
    We have allowed these despicable parasites to infect everything they touch. Someone please call a pest exterminator before it’s too late.

    • Agree: werpor
    • Replies: @werpor
  38. QCIC says:
    @Diversity Heretic

    At some point Taiwan will be absorbed by China without a shot, so this is not the real reason for a war with China.

    The entire Chinese miracle depends on unprecedented import and export flows which could shut down overnight in a real war. Because of this vulnerability, I imagine China is the most likely actor to use nuclear weapons, if only to demonstrate they are prickly. Even more likely than Israel or the USA.

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  39. anonymous[139] • Disclaimer says:

    Ukraine is beginning to outlive its usefulness and is becoming a liability so therefore will get dumped in some way. It was never about Ukraine anyway, they were just a tool of the US. Does anybody seriously believe US government leaders ever really cared about or for Ukrainians? Look for Zelensky to die as a martyr in a CIA plane crash that’ll be blamed on the Russians. As in the mafia, he knows too much and has gotten too demanding.

    • Replies: @36 ulster
  40. @Notsofast

    I´ve always held the Banderites ( the actual, not the (((LARPers))) ) are the
    designated kapores in this no matter how it plays out – but we do not seem
    to be quite there yet (i. e. they are still useful otherwise).

    • Replies: @Notsofast
  41. One day America is going to pick a fight with the wrong enemy.

    • Replies: @Notsofast
  42. Notsofast says:
    @nokangaroos

    it looks to me like that time is rapidly approaching, the helicopter crash that took out a bunch of hardcore banderites in the ministry of the interior, seems very suspicious to me. remember this is all happening after zelensky went to d.c. to attract “investors” in the new metaverse ukraine and was told we love you but clean up the “corruption” around you. in other words get rid of the banderites by feeding them into the meat grinder and we’re in.

    i think this explains, this slow motion implosion we are witnessing, they’re going to send in enough weapons, so the die-hard ukranazis can light brigade their way to oblivion, because they definitely don’t want to see them in the e.u.

  43. Notsofast says:
    @George 1

    netanyahu with the cookie monster on a leash, that sounds like the grand champion at the world’s ugliest dog contest.

  44. Anon[208] • Disclaimer says:

    “Frankly, if I was a neocon, I would be demanding we pivot to China.”

    Tucker/Faux reporting tonight (Feb. 3) that a “Chinese balloon” is hovering over some nuclear towers in Montana. And yet, Biden and the libbies in the Pentagon are refusing to shoot it down!

    LOL

  45. Derer says:
    @Jim H

    Those three are able to run this country for the benefit of Israel. It is a reflection of Washington Christians mediocrity.

  46. pyrrhus says:
    @KA

    But the tanks will probably never get there, and won’t be usable even if they do…Biden might even know that….

  47. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @beavertales

    The U.S. has lost whatever moral legitimacy it had. Only neocons don’t see it that way, for two reasons:

    1. they are on the payroll

    2. most of them are jews who see the U.S. as their most responsive golem even now.

    • Replies: @anonymous
  48. “God’s Chosen” (((Trust Fund Children))) Capitalizing On Global Warfare.

    Video Link

  49. 36 ulster says:
    @anonymous

    Indeed it never was about Ukraine. I don’t lose sleep over the squandering of Ukrainian lives and limbs, but any decent person should be outraged and saddened by the sight of nationalistic Ukrainians being “attritted” in the cause of globalism, compelled by a corrupt Kiev elite, egged on by our duplicitous Western “leaders” and supported by our metropolitan bien-pensants who believe that sporting blue-and-yellow paraphernalia is brave and virtuous. The latter (last?) group can be dismissed as not having any grasp of a region with a history of political and ethnic conflict. The others know full well that “liberating” the hostile, Russian-speaking Donbass and Crimea is way beyond the capability of the Ukrainian military, and if weakening the Russians was what it was all about…well, it looks several nations are in a weakened state–and Russia is not one of them.

  50. Petermx says:

    “He has Marco Rubio on to talk about China, he absolutely supports a war with China, the entire Ron DeSantis wing supports a war with China. They want to bring back the 1980s with China instead of Russia.”

    They might regret that. The US does not lead in much anymore. They have a huge nuclear arsenal, but Russia’s is bigger and they have Facebook, Google and Twitter, as well as American television news stations to disseminate their propaganda. I believe China prevents most Jewish/American sexual degeneracy, hatred and propaganda from being disseminated in their country. Russia and Iran should too. I don’t know why Iran allows it in. I would recommend all countries from allowing American media in their country. The US and Europe prohibits Russian and Iranian media. If Europe was not run by sexual degenerates and morons (these are western Europeans) I would recommend they ban American media too.

    If a war broke out, America’s enemies would ban its media, one of the few weapons it still has.

  51. Levtraro says:
    @Anon

    … why would the Taiwanese fight and die for America? Half of Taiwan’s population have relatives in China.

    Maybe the Taiwanese would be less stupid than the Ukrainians but I think they are normal people, easily manipulated into doing what is contrary to their own interests.

    Unless of course they are fanatical about anal sex?

    Taiwan approved anal marriage many years ago, the 1st Asian nation to go contra natura to please the USA.

  52. @The Alarmist

    It’s also noteworthy that Germany’s population was just 75 million, while the Soviet Union’s was 170 million, the US 150 million, and the British and French empires held sway over a billion people. It’s heartbreaking to look at Germany’s proposals to the League of Nations for just international relations, abolition of war, rejecting weapons of mass destruction and attacks on civilians, ending the new arms race, and more. All were ignored, for the League was a rubberstamp for British global dominance (the US Congress refused to join for this reason) the same way the UN was perverted into a shill for US world hegemony – and clearly, this was the motivation for FDR’s extreme provocations of the rising new world powers. They could not be allowed to undermine Washington’s ambitions. And a war would be just the ticket to silence the growing militant unrest in the US in reaction to the hardships of the Depression that FDR’s expensive programs were doing little to remedy.

  53. @Emslander

    ‘…Russia will want to bring its historical center back under the flag. Kiev is Russia. Odessa is Russia. Lviv is Russia…’

    Lemberg is Russia? When was that?

  54. Renoman says:

    The World does not need more Nazi’s! Down with Ukraine, the sooner the better and I can’t believe it’s taken this long. That Biden can’t even steal fast, how is he still here? America is going over the edge and that also can’t come soon enough.

  55. werpor says:
    @CelestiaQuesta

    The Jerusalem U.S.-Israel Strategic Partnership Joint Declaration
HOME
BRIEFING ROOM
STATEMENTS AND RELEASES
The leaders of the United States and Israel, President Biden and Prime Minister Lapid, met in Jerusalem on 14 July 2022, and adopted the following Joint Declaration on the US-Israel Strategic Partnership:

    [MORE]

    The United States and Israel reaffirm the unbreakable bonds between our two countries and the enduring commitment of the United States to Israel’s security. Our countries further reaffirm that the strategic U.S.-Israel partnership is based on a bedrock of shared values, shared interests, and true friendship. Furthermore, the United States and Israel affirm that among the values the countries share is an unwavering commitment to democracy, the rule of law, and the calling of “Tikkun Olam,” repairing the world. The leaders express appreciation to former Prime Minister Bennett, who led the most diverse government in Israel’s history, and under whose leadership this extraordinary partnership has continued to grow stronger.

    Consistent with the longstanding security relationship between the United States and Israel and the unshakeable U.S. commitment to Israel’s security, and especially to the maintenance of its qualitative military edge, the United States reiterates its steadfast commitment to preserve and strengthen Israel’s capability to deter its enemies and to defend itself by itself against any threat or combination of threats. The United States further reiterates that these commitments are bipartisan and sacrosanct, and that they are not only moral commitments, but also strategic commitments that are vitally important to the national security of the United States itself.

    The United States stresses that integral to this pledge is the commitment never to allow Iran to acquire a nuclear weapon, and that it is prepared to use all elements of its national power to ensure that outcome. The United States further affirms the commitment to work together with other partners to confront Iran’s aggression and destabilizing activities, whether advanced directly or through proxies and terrorist organizations such as Hezbollah, Hamas, and Palestinian Islamic Jihad.

    The United States and Israel note that nothing better reflects the steadfast and bipartisan support of the United States to Israel’s security than the unprecedented Memoranda of Understanding on security assistance signed by successive U.S. administrations over the last few decades, and that these arrangements demonstrate in word and deed that the United States considers Israel’s security essential to U.S. interests and an anchor of regional stability.

    The United States strongly supports implementing the terms of the current historic $38 billion Memorandum of Understanding in full, which honors the United States’ enduring commitment to Israel’s security, as well as its conviction that a follow-on MOU should address emerging threats and new realities. In addition, the United States is committed to seeking additional missile defense assistance in excess of MOU levels, in exceptional circumstances such as the hostilities with Hamas over eleven days in May 2021. Israel appreciates the U.S. commitment to the MOU and for providing an additional $1 billion over MOU levels in supplemental missile defense funding following the 2021 conflict. Further, the countries express enthusiasm to move forward the U.S.-Israel defense partnership through cooperation in cutting-edge defense technologies such as high energy laser weapons systems to defend the skies of Israel and in the future those of other U.S. and Israel security partners.

    Israel thanks the United States for its ongoing and extensive support for deepening and broadening the historic Abraham Accords. The countries affirm that Israel’s peace and normalization agreements with the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, and Morocco constitute a critical addition to Israel’s strategic peace treaties with Egypt and Jordan, all of which are important to the future of the Middle East region and to the cause of regional security, prosperity, and peace. The countries note that the historic Negev Summit, initiated and hosted by Prime Minister Lapid, was a landmark event in joint U.S.-Israeli efforts to build a new regional framework that is changing the face of the Middle East.

    The United States and Israel welcome in this regard the meeting held in Manama, Bahrain on June 27th, forming the Negev Forum on regional cooperation. The United States welcomes these developments and is committed to continue playing an active role, including in the context of President Biden’s upcoming visit to Saudi Arabia, in building a robust regional architecture; to deepen the ties between Israel and all of its regional partners; to advance Israel’s regional integration over time; and to expand the circle of peace to include ever more Arab and Muslim States.

    The United States and Israel also welcome the opportunity to participate in a quadrilateral (hybrid) meeting, together with the leaders of India and the United Arab Emirates, in the context of the I2U2 initiative, bringing together these four countries to advance cooperation in economy and strategic infrastructure, and demonstrating the importance of this new partnership, first launched by their Foreign Ministers in October 2021.

    The United States and Israel reiterate their concerns regarding the ongoing attacks against Ukraine, their commitment to Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, and affirmed the importance of continued humanitarian assistance to the people of Ukraine.

    The United States and Israel affirm that they will continue to work together to combat all efforts to boycott or de-legitimize Israel, to deny its right to self-defense, or to unfairly single it out in any forum, including at the United Nations or the International Criminal Court. While fully respecting the right to freedom of expression, they firmly reject the BDS campaign. The two countries will use the tools at their disposal to fight every scourge and source of antisemitism and to respond whenever legitimate criticism crosses over into bigotry and hatred or attempts to undermine Israel’s rightful and legitimate place among the family of nations. In this context, they express their deep concern over the global surge in antisemitism and reassert their commitment to counter this ancient hatred in all of its manifestations. The United States is proud to stand with the Jewish and democratic State of Israel, and with its people, whose uncommon courage, resilience, and spirit of innovation are an inspiration to so many worldwide.

    The United States and Israel commit to continuing to discuss the challenges and opportunities in Israeli-Palestinian relations. The countries condemn the deplorable series of terrorist attacks against Israeli citizens in recent months and affirm the need to confront radical forces, such as Hamas, seeking to inflame tension and instigate violence and terrorism. President Biden reaffirms his longstanding and consistent support of a two-state solution and for advancing toward a reality in which Israelis and Palestinians alike can enjoy equal measures of security, freedom and prosperity. The United States stands ready to work with Israel, the Palestinian Authority, and regional stakeholders toward that goal. The leaders also affirm their shared commitment to initiatives that strengthen the Palestinian economy and improve the quality of life of Palestinians.

    The United States and Israel enjoy extensive bilateral cooperation and dialogue between their two countries in many critical spheres – from groundbreaking collaboration in science and technology, to unique intelligence sharing and joint military exercises, to shared efforts in confronting pressing global challenges such as climate change, food security, and healthcare. To complement the extensive existing scientific and technological cooperation between their two countries, and to bring their cooperation to a new height, the leaders launched a new U.S.-Israel Strategic High-Level Dialogue on Technology to form a U.S.-Israel technological partnership in critical and emerging technologies, as well as in areas of global concern: pandemic preparedness, climate change, artificial intelligence, and trusted technology. This new technological partnership will be designed to boost the countries’ mutual innovation ecosystems and address geostrategic challenges.

    In this same spirit, the United States and Israel affirm their commitment to continue their shared and accelerated efforts to enable Israeli passport holders to be included in the U.S. Visa Waiver Program as soon as possible, as well as their support for increased collaboration on operational cyber exchange and on combatting cybercrime. The leaders state that all of these initiatives, and countless other joint endeavors, undertaken between their peoples at every level of government and civil society demonstrate that the U.S.-Israel strategic partnership is indispensable and makes an outsized contribution not only to the good of American and Israeli citizens but also to the good of the Middle East and of the world.

    With this record of remarkable achievement and with a sense of the incredible promise that the unparalleled U.S.-Israel relationship holds for the future, the United States and Israel warmly welcome entering the 75th year of this extraordinary partnership.

    Signed at Jerusalem on the 14th day of the July, 2022, which corresponds to the 15th day of Tamuz, 5782, in the Hebrew calendar, in duplicate in the English language.
    Joseph R. Biden Jr.
    President of the United States of America
    Yair Lapid
    Prime Minister of the State of Israel

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  56. Anonymous[169] • Disclaimer says:
    @beavertales

    US regime posturing just looks like the delusions of a lunatic now.

    Aspersions on the sanity of rulers are wasted breath.

    The US could boot countries from the Olympics, seize their property, threaten their borders, eliminate their leaders, or invade them with total disregard for international law.

    The US did all those things during WW II, and nobody even raised an eyebrow.

    The simple fact is that the US no longer has the resources to enforce the Pax Americana, so the Pax is being dismantled. The WW II descended population, which could enforce such a doctrine once, is only about half the US population in 2023. US heavy industry, fed by enough resources to make the US self-sufficient, was given away 50 years ago (1970s). A US civil population capable of being drafted and willing to be drafted no longer exists. Even hereditary career military families are telling this generation to work at something else. This trend started with the Vietnam War, a byproduct of the fight between ethnic groups (mainly Irish and Jewish) over who would run the US Federal Government, was reinforced by the anti-anti-Communist campaigns of the Jewish coalition, and accelerated after the fall of the USSR in 1990-1991.

    Since then the US has acted on bluff and a hope that new areas would be brought into the global trade network and would accept US as the judge (rather than the policeman) of that order. Essentially, the US hoped for Chinese gratitude (an oxymoron if I’ve ever written one) and deployment of heavily mechanized armed forces against resource rich governments. The US hoped to duplicate its consolidation of power over a global system — a sort of weak world government, if you wanted to consider things that way.

    This hope of duplication failed. The Jewish coalition acted in accordance with Jewish theology/eschatology and destroyed the ethnic group (Germanic/Irish descended Americans [1]) that was its source of military personnel. Assembling a US coalition was accomplished by giving it access to world markets, which destroyed US industry. Retaining control of the Federal Government turned out to be possible only by mass immigration of people unsuited for military service or industrial employment, and in suppressing active and innovative industry, engineering, and science. Only data processing, which had historically been used for population control, was permitted to advance into a surveillance society, with only obvious development such as enhanced mail order catalogs, gossip sites (like this one), entertainment, and reference works.

    So, now, the rest of the world is breaking free from the US. A sane leader (Trump, for example) could slow that process, but could not stop it. Neither Hitler nor Churchill could save the British Empire, although both in their way tried to. Similarly, Stalin could not save Communism, although he and his successor, N. Khrushchev, tried. Nor would it be possible to stop the world from breaking free of the US.

    Ukraine is being abandoned by the US, which bluffed and had its bluff called. Europe will follow Ukraine, at which point the US will be effectively out of Eurasia and dependent on AUKUS (an alliance of Australia, UK, and USA that intends to hold the blue water oceans as the US held the First Island Chain after losing in Vietnam). A leader like Trump might be able to hold the US together. The Democratic leaders appear to be trying to win by encouraging their voters to harm themselves, an “If you don’t do what we say, you will be responsible for our deaths” sort of thing. The harm appears to be increasing (see Steve Sailor ‘s articles and the destruction of content in college courses of study), and has almost reached suicidal levels (for example, encouraging mass raids on grocery stores and encouraging reckless driving). It is on the verge of this:

    Video Link

    In either case, US dominance is almost over, and the sanity or lack of same by leaders is as much a result of that nearing end of dominance as it is the cause.
    **********************************************************

    [MORE]

    1] The American civil population in the 1600s -1890 era found itself in a high mortality environment mixed with a constant war against a near-peer in the battle zone indigenous population. That, rather than slavery, is what formed the US character.
    Pioneers (who wanted only to be able to support their families by farming) moved into Indian territory with effectively no support from American society. The Indians attacked the settlers as they attacked each other (King Phillips’ War was the first such war in the US Northeast), and the settlers responded. This is what led the British to try stopping US expansion while it controlled the US colonies. When the settlers started seriously losing, they called in government military forces. Again, this is King Phillips’ War and pretty much every Indian war up until the frontier closed, ~1890 (https://schoolhistory.co.uk/notes/closing-of-the-frontier-impact/ ) .
    So what? End of the Frontier still left the US with a remnant population with a pioneer/warrior tradition that had full faith that a war declared by the Federal Government had to be for the benefit of the US population. The “Americanization” push of the Progressive Era led the 1830-1929 immigrants to believe something similar, or at least keep quiet if they did not believe.
    This belief in the purpose of Federal military action has been betrayed since at least the Progressive’s attempt at Imperialism (“I’m going out to the Phillipoons, to serve my country and live on prunes” to take a quote from The Sand Pebbles). This belief has not been shared by the Federally dominant Jewish Coalition or by its successor, the Left Black Coalition, and is not now shared by the descendants of the pioneers, who are no longer willing to form an effective military force for the existing Federal system (as of 2023/02). Even if it were, half the US population is now non-White, hence not descendants of the pioneers.

  57. SMD says:

    If politicians want a war they and their families should be on the first in line to fight. If it’s not worth risking their own lives it’s not worth fighting at all.

  58. @Petermx

    The reason why Western elites want to kick out all Russian media is that they fear how the public in the West would react if exposed to sanity. Conversely, Russia should allow at least some Western media so that the Russian people see for themselves what insanity looks like and that it isn’t just propaganda by their government.
    When people aren’t exposed to it directly, they tend to think, that no they can’t be like that there, our government is bullsh*tting us. When they get to see it with their own eyes, the discrepancy between reality and the narrative becomes obvious and then they realise that the West has gone truly insane.

    • Replies: @Old Brown Fool
  59. werpor says:

    “This is what led the British to try stopping US expansion while it controlled the US colonies.”

    My reading of history has me concluding there are usually more than one reason determining a particular decision, or, additional supplementary detailed help flesh out the circumstances.

    The British before the seven Years War only controlled the Eastern Seaboard American Colonies. The French controlled the Ohio and Mississippi watersheds. The British understood the necessity of curbing Colonial expansion to the west since this would likely serve to provoke war between England and France. …As though they needed any more provocation than already existed in Europe.

    What came to be known as the Seven Years’ War had roots in colonial America in conflicts between Great Britain and France in 1754, when the British sought to expand into territory claimed by the French in North America. The war came to be known as the French and Indian War, with both the British and the French and their respective Native American allies fighting for control of territory. Hostilities were heightened when a joint British and native Mingo force (led by a 22-year-old Lieutenant Colonel George Washington and Chief Tanacharison) ambushed a small French force at the Battle of Jumonville Glen on 28 May 1754. The conflict exploded across the colonial boundaries and extended to Britain’s seizure of hundreds of French merchant ships at sea, with Horace Walpole describing his contemporary Washington’s role therein as “the volley fired by a young Virginian in the backwoods of America [that] set the world on fire.”

    After the Seven Years War the Indian Proclamation Act, a British law, banned colonists from settling west of the middle of the Appalachian Mountains. In response to Pontiac’s Rebellion, a revolt of Native Americans Led by Pontiac, an Ottawa Chief King George declared all lands west of the Appalachian divide off-limits to colonial settlers. Until the American Revolution entirely changed the entire trajectory of what became the United States.

    After the American Revolution the proclamations legality ended. After the Revolution settlers flooded into the Ohio Valley and beyond.

    • Thanks: Kolya Krassotkin
  60. That was the pitch: “we can do this quick with a small NATO force and some sanctions and Putin will be run out of office.”

    If that was the pitch, and it wasn’t, they’d actually be a bigger fool than even you, Anglin.

    Here’s how you’ll know: if they sent the fighter jets, they’re escalating.

    Putin escalated to a full on war last February. He started at a low level in 2014 when he stole Crimea and tried with the Donbas, but failed. The only thing Putin can do next is send over a few nukes. He can, that is, if he wants to hunted with dogs. while Putin is an idiot, he isn’t that stupid. Yet. That’s coming.

    • Replies: @Old Brown Fool
  61. @Passing By

    I think Russia is allowing American media, exactly for the purpose mentioned.

  62. @Emslander

    This century will see the USA broken into about ten mini-homelands, ripe for reunification in the next century under nationalist authoritarian leadership.

    And foreigners will be expelled.

    That is why the globalist can never let such a thing to happen. He will try his best to choke such a development.

    Hint: only those countries with the knowledge of agriculture, that too not very technology intensive, will survive. American interior has it.

  63. @Quartermaster

    Putin stole Crimea? A land with 90% Russian people, with 15,000 soldiers, with the Russian naval base leased out to Russia for decades, and which was annexed to Ukraine by Khrushchev without asking the views of the Crimean people? What is so sacrosanct about Ukraine’s borders as drawn by Stalin and Khrushchev? Why is that sanctity not applicable to Serbia and other Yugo states?

    Lvov was not Russian, but Crimea was Russian since 1784. Only a fool with a death wish will kill Russians in Donbas through shelling. The retarded Washington does not know what Russia is controlling – a mixture of population far worse than what Gaddhafi was preventing from invading Europe – and it is trying to dismantle Russia, which will unleash horrors of unseen proportions, probably equal to the Chinese and Indian famines.

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
  64. Hortence says:

    No.

    We are moving towards the open introduction of NATO ground forces this year as events unfold.

    The ‘Ukraine can’t win’ narrative we’re seeing being disseminated in the media is solely to support the direct involvement of NATO to save their ‘destroy Russia’ project.

    • Replies: @Passing By
  65. @Hortence

    Like when NATO introduced ground troops in Serbia back in 1999? What, they didn’t, even though they had total air dominance? So, they didn’t want a ground war against Serbia but they want a ground war against Russia?
    That said, the West is now ruled by much worse imbeciles than back in 1999 so anything’s possible. Well, давай.

    • Replies: @Hortence
  66. Wokechoke says:
    @Old Brown Fool

    It’s been a Russian territory for about as long as the US has existed.

  67. anonymous[195] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon

    Respect for the US was lost when the rest of the world realized that, for all its bullying and blustering, the US was thoroughly under the spell of a vicious tribe of inbred psychopaths. The same BS artists who brag about serving on the USS Bullshit in the Bering Strait, staring down the Bear, are the same ones who assume the fetal position when their Jew masters lecture them. If you are a decadent coward, eventually the rest of the world will stop listening. Think of the cognitive schizophrenia involved in bragging to others about how tough you are, and then cowering in fear when Merrick Garland and Jonathan Greenblatt call you names and strip away your constitutional rights because you’re white. You have to have a tenuous grasp on reality to believe the former when you live the latter. American ex-marines are the biggest posers going, and are only tough around those who lack the means to defend themselves. Sort of sums up America. Actually, sort of sums up Israel, as well. But the latter is master of the former, and the former will bleed out before its master does. And the shabbos goy in the US Congress and Senate will cheer it on until their master leaves them to perish, too.

  68. Hortence says:
    @Passing By

    They did deploy ground forces and are there to this day.

    The operation to do so is called KFOR and they seized Kosovo.

    Something similar utilizing Poland is being readied to `protect` Western Ukraine and freeze Russian territorial spread.

    • Replies: @Passing By
  69. @Hortence

    They deployed them after Serbia signed the Kumanovo agreement, which was more and admission of stalemate by NATO than a capitulation by Serbia. After 78 days of bombardment, NATO got only what Serbia accepted before the bombardment and nothing of what it requested in the Rambouillet “agreements” that Serbia rejected. KFOR wasn’t exclusively NATO in the beginning and Kosovo was eventually separated from Serbia in violation of the UNSC resolution 1244, therefore in violation of international law, i.e. Western powers didn’t keep their word and reneged on their signature.
    Now let’s talk about practicalities. How many entry points into Ukraine are there from NATO countries? How do you think NATO will be able to conceal the large concentration of troops necessary for an invasion of Western Ukraine? What makes you think that the Russians will sit idly while the troops pour in? What do you think is the purpose of the large Russian grouping in Belarus?
    There is no way for NATO to enter Ukraine en masse without Russian agreement. If they try to force their way in, it’s WW3. If it’s WW3, everything in the West becomes fair target and any type of weapon is fair use. Western politicians are imbeciles with zero knowledge of military matters. And although Western military top brass are mostly political generals who are where they are b/c they sing tunes that elites like to hear, that is b/c they are averse to taking risks when they deal with politicians, I don’t think they’d be keen to take the risk of being responsible for dreadful losses on the battlefield.

    • Agree: Dnought
  70. DDearborn says:

    Hmmm

    after more than 120 Billion dollars in accounted for “AID” ( Most of which is ending up in israel) the only ones getting thrown under the bus are the American taxpayers, the Palestinian people and the next real target Syria to the Euphrates River…

  71. @werpor

    Cutting out the BS-as the USA is controlled by Jewish money, Washington will follow orders from Tel Aviv. That is the whole of The Law.

  72. @Petermx

    China has the most massive productive infrastructure EVER seen. In any war they would out-produce the USA many times over. This is why the USA has chosen bio-warfare to effect a genocide against the Chinese. CoViD19 is just a test run.

  73. @QCIC

    Trade is 34% of Chinese GNP. If the USA enacted a trade embargo on China, most of the non-Western world would ignore it, it would devastate US exports to China and the profits of US corporations operating in China, and remove all those cheap consumer goods that keep the US underclass quiescent. China has been preparing for a US attack since 1949.

    • Replies: @QCIC
  74. QCIC says:
    @mulga mumblebrain

    I think it is a crucial 34%. Much of China’s energy is imported and that is what makes the other 66% of her GDP possible. I don’t think China has been able to protect itself against an external shutdown of energy supplies. I agree this disruption seems unlikely since it would have pervasive ramifications across the globe. Yet it is something the Western Navies could readily achieve by sinking a bunch of tankers and cargo ships. Because of this vulnerability I suspect China has been preparing for an attack against the USA, probably since the 1990’s. This would be some sort of decapitation strike, against which the US is extremely vulnerable.

    If Unz’s COVID origin story is true they may have bumped up the schedule.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Andrew Anglin Comments via RSS