The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewAndrew Anglin Archive
Grotesque Fatmerican Dogs Say Putin Is a Bitch, Won’t Do Shit
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
List of Bookmarks

Does this seem actually insane to anyone? To just listen to Putin threatening to send nukes and then claim he’s too pussy to go through with it so they can do whatever they want to him?

Like, we had that whole Cold War thing for decades, and the US government was telling people the Russians were going to nuke them, telling kids to hide under desks when the nukes drop. If JFK or Nixon had said “nah, those faggots ain’t gonna do shit,” it would have raised a lot of eyebrows, certainly.

It’s possible the Cold War nuclear hysteria was a bit too extreme, but the situation right now is a lot worse than it was in the 60s or 70s, and there is legitimately a chance the Russians could start firing nukes.

Saying “Putin is a pussy, don’t worry about him” seems sort of irresponsible.

Reuters:

The U.S. decision to allow Ukraine to fire American weapons deeper into Russia has not increased the risk of a nuclear attack, which is unlikely, despite Russian President Vladimir Putin’s increasingly bellicose statements, five sources familiar with U.S. intelligence told Reuters.

But Russia is likely to expand a campaign of sabotage against European targets to increase pressure on the West over its support for Kyiv, said two senior officials, a lawmaker and two congressional aides briefed on the matter.

A series of intelligence assessments over the past seven months have concluded nuclear escalation was unlikely to result from a decision to loosen restrictions on Ukraine’s use of U.S. weapons. That view has not changed following President Joe Biden’s changed U.S. stance this month on weapons, said the sources, who were granted anonymity to speak freely about sensitive intelligence.

It’s unlikely a person who orders a coffee doesn’t know it’s hot. But the McDonald’s cup still says that.

Something being “unlikely” and therefore not any problem at all is not how American society usually functions.

“The assessments were consistent: The ATACMs weren’t going to change Russia’s nuclear calculus,” said one congressional aide briefed on the intelligence, referring to American missiles with a range of up to 190 miles (306 km).

Russia’s launch of a new ballistic missile last week, which analysts say was meant as a warning to Washington and its European allies, has not changed that conclusion.

See: Responding to US/UK Attacks, Russia Fires New Ultra-Hypersonic Ballistic Missile Into the Ukraine

One of the five U.S. officials said while Washington assessed that Russia would not seek to escalate with its nuclear forces, it would try to match what it views as U.S. escalation. The official said fielding the new missile was part of that effort.

U.S. officials said the intelligence has helped guide an often divisive debate over recent months inside Biden’s administration about whether Washington loosening restrictions on Ukraine’s use of American weapons was worth the risk of angering Putin.

Putin doesn’t use a cellphone and doesn’t allow them in meetings. I’m honestly not sure how they can even claim to have intelligence this specific about what Putin is thinking. He has very publicly put nuclear weapons on high alert and they’re ready to be fired at a moment’s notice. He gives the word and those suckers are in the air in seconds.

This “unlikely” business might make sense if we were facing some kind of existential threat from Russia and making decisions under those circumstances, but regardless of the calculations about likelihood, we are currently at some level of risk of cities in Europe and even America getting nuked because the US wants to control the Ukraine, something which they have not explained other than to claim they want to help gays.

It’s a very strange situation all around.

(Republished from The Daily Stormer by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 46 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Putin doesn’t use a cellphone

    Nor does any real man.

  2. Putin is not a fool and does not allow himself to be provoked and turned into a murderer of civilians as the West does in its wars.

  3. AxeGryndr says:

    Putin can get a lot of mileage out of the Oreshnik sans nuke before he has to go that route. I would also expect that Russia is developing long range versions, and ever higher speeds for all. America should consider getting out of the war business, before it is put out.

  4. Ximenes says:

    The “Grotesque Fatmerican Dogs” in the headline turn out to be “five sources familiar with US intelligence.” I would assume that if you could go to DC and meet these five individuals, they would all be thin and healthy, their diet would include only grass feed beef and organically raised eggs and vegetables. They probably do all their grocery shopping at Northern Virginia food outlets where items containing seed oils and high fructose corn syrup are not to be found.

    Grotestque fatmericans are everywhere, but they aren’t the ones making the decisions in DC.

    • Replies: @Exile in Paradise
  5. But Russia is likely to expand a campaign of sabotage against European targets

    What is this? The only one sabotaging Europe is the US, like the North Stream pipeline.

  6. @Liborio Guaso

    Putin is not a fool and does not allow himself to be provoked and turned into a murderer of civilians as the West does in its wars.

    The Russians constantly use Iranian drones against Ukrainian cities.

    They’re not accurate enough to target something like a tank.

    So how is that not targeting civilians?

    • Replies: @Mark in BC
  7. Europe and even America getting nuked because the US wants to control the Ukraine, something which they have not explained other than to claim they want to help gays.

    Maybe Anglin can explain why he wants Ukraine to submit to a multi-racial totalitarian state that has strict hate speech laws and also imprisons journalists for questioning the government.

    Why not let Ukraine take their own path?

    Anglin constantly rails about the Jews and yet he idealizes a dictator that praises them.

    “The Jews promote moral and high values in the youth” – Putin in June 2024 speech to Russian Jews

    Maybe he could explain this contradiction to us.

  8. Zogby says:

    Putin is America’s bitch. Just because you have a habit of calling people names for saying things you don’t like to hear doesn’t change reality. The Moscow oblast has a population of 21 million. St. Petersburg region another 6-8 million. Russia’s elite and intelligentsia reside there. Outside these two major population centers, the rest of Russia are mostly peasants. If Russia’s two major population centers are wiped out in a nuclear attack, Russia will not continue to survive as an advanced civilization.

    Putin is such a coward toward the US, Russia is too scared to shoot down American UAVs operating against it in the black sea near Crimea. Those are nothing but grossly overpriced pieces of hardware! How big a coward does someone have to be to fear destroying enemy hardware used in war against him? The Houthis are shooting down MQ9s regularly with their more humble means. Iran once shot down an RQ4 which is probably 5-6 times more expensive than the MQ9. Trump exploded with anger, wanted to bomb Iranian bases (with humans in them) in retaliation, but cowered out of it. Do you know why? Because Iran has a massive missile and drone attack capability to hit US military assets around it back.

    Ukraine is going to suffer of course and be bombed harder. That’s why the Pentagon tried to talk them out of it. But they keep publicly nagging and browbeating the US about it, so the Biden gave them permission to take the risks they want to take and which they’ll have to bear by the themselves.

  9. The use of the Oreshnik system indicates that Russia does not need to escalate to nuclear weapons to achieve considerable destructive effect from one missile attack. Putin’s dilemma is whether to attack forces on the soil of NATO countries, an act clearly justified by the NATO attacks on Russia. He is, I’m sure, under considerable domestic pressure to do just that, but that might provoke nuclear retaliation from NATO countries, leading to a nuclear exchange with tens or hundreds of millions of dead. Russia is clearly winning the war in Ukraine, slowly but surely, and the NATO missiles don’t appear to be doing significant damage–their sole purpose is to provoke a Russian response.

    • Agree: Old Prude
  10. @John Johnson

    Quit acting like you actually care. Everybody here knows your game and that you are likely being paid for it. I mean, what kind of lowlife scum do you have to be to have a job where you are supposed to convince others to embrace a path of suicide?

    • Agree: Anonymous534
    • Replies: @anonymous
  11. @John Johnson

    Yes, Putin and the Russians are so incompetent that they’ve lost 10 million troops against only 5 Ukrainians that have broken a fingernail since Feb. ’22.

    Same with the bungling EyeRainE-Ans. Stooges all.

    Either you’re a troll or dumber than a sack of hammers.

  12. It’s unlikely a person who orders a coffee doesn’t know it’s hot. But the McDonald’s cup still says that.

    That “HOT” warning is only printed in English.

    Illegal aliens take note:
    1) Find yourself a woke Jew lawyer,
    2) Claim you burned yourself because the warning wasn’t in your language,
    3) Win the lottery!

  13. Mustardoe says:

    This begs the question who exactly is running the show? Is it Sullivan and Blinken or are they just taking orders from the alphabet soup agencies. I’m pretty sure it isn’t Biden who probably can’t recall his own name. And it sure isn’t “the people”. My own view is nobody is in charge because that’s what it looks like.

  14. Rich says:

    When idiots like Sullivan and Blinken and Austin sit atop the three agencies facilitating the MIC, it’s no wonder they allow the escalation of this war. The war in Ukraine is coming to an end, firing these missiles means contracts to make more missiles. See where these three con artists end up “working” after Trump is sworn in. Let’s hope these morons don’t set off Armageddon before they’re out. Kind of funny if the atheists set it off when everyone was pointing at the Christian zionists.

  15. DanFromCT says:

    The US and GB didn’t have to give the Ukrainians permission to fire missiles into Russia since Americans and Brits have been doing the firing into Russia all along. If the Ukrainians have anything to do with firing these advanced missiles, it’s as errand boys. And, when Reuters mentions US officials, we need to remember they’re talking about DEI flunkies of homicidal psychopaths like Jake Sullivan and Anthony Blinken, the two of whom do business these days as “Joe Biden.” It’s also reassuring to hear from Mike Waltz that he and Jake Sullivan are on the same page in everything, right?

  16. Anon[426] • Disclaimer says:
    @Mark in BC

    I’m voting for the second option

  17. anonymous[159] • Disclaimer says:
    @Hapalong Cassidy

    I still am not sure if John Johnson is a jew or a human being. He has the jew capacity for making up his own reality, but he also comes across like many of the small-brained boomer cons I’ve met in my life. All we can confidently say about this asshole is that he takes it up the ass from the hebes.

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
  18. “Saying ‘Putin is a pussy, don’t worry about him’ seems sort of irresponsible.”

    Sort of? Really?

  19. When all else fails, the Empire uses false flag events. Perhaps a false flag is being staged in London to blame Putin…..sounds very plausible as London webcams are out of service and military planes have been flying around London frequently:


    Video Link

    • Replies: @Hang All Text Drivers
  20. Wokechoke says:
    @anonymous

    His job is to convince WN leaning types into supporting Jewish causes.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
  21. Remember how international terrorism was sold as a huge threat in the 2000s? Even UFOs are sold as a national security threat by the likes of ex-counterintelligence officer (i.e. some kind of psyops spook) Lue Elizondo, but a possible nuclear war is not a national security threat and you shouldn’t worry about it. Curious.

    I interpret this as them having been instructed that this is what they have to say as some sort of strategic move. Chatbot says:

    [MORE]

    Publicly denying the credibility of an adversary’s threats is a complex tactic with both potential benefits and drawbacks. Here’s a breakdown of the key considerations:

    Potential Benefits:

    * Undermining Adversary’s Resolve: Directly challenging the credibility of an adversary’s threats can weaken their resolve and ability to project power. It can make them appear less confident and less likely to follow through.
    * Deterring Escalation: By publicly downplaying threats, it can signal that the adversary’s actions are not as serious as they claim. This can discourage further escalation and maintain a sense of stability.
    * Projecting Strength: A confident and dismissive response can project an image of strength and resilience, potentially deterring future threats.

    Potential Drawbacks:

    * Miscalculation: Underestimating an adversary’s intentions can lead to miscalculation and potentially dangerous situations. If the adversary follows through on their threats, it can catch the other side unprepared.
    * Escalation: Publicly dismissing threats can be seen as provocative and lead to an escalation of tensions. The adversary may feel disrespected and respond with more aggressive actions.
    * Loss of Credibility: If the adversary’s threats are later proven to be credible, it can damage the credibility of the side that dismissed them. This can weaken future attempts at deterrence.

    Ultimately, the effectiveness of this tactic depends on various factors, including the specific context, the nature of the threat, the credibility of the adversary, and the overall strategic goals. It’s crucial to weigh the potential benefits and risks carefully before employing this tactic.

  22. @Mark in BC

    Either you’re a troll or dumber than a sack of hammers.

    I asked a specific question that neither of you answered.

    Let’s try again:

    The Russians constantly use Iranian drones against Ukrainian cities.

    They’re not accurate enough to target something like a tank.

    So how is that not targeting civilians?

  23. @Wokechoke

    His job is to convince WN leaning types into supporting Jewish causes.

    Wokechoke would you like to take a shot at explaining how this war sticks it to the Jews?

    Go ahead and explain how making Orthodox graveyards will stick it to Western Jews.

    Let’s hear it.

    Anglin hasn’t given a rational explanation so maybe you can help him.

    Did you agree with Putin’s June speech where he said that the Jews promote moral and patriotic values in the youth? Gosh it seems that Anglin missed that one. I can’t find any mention of it at the time. In fact it seems that most of the Putin supporters at Unz had nothing to say about it.

    If Biden said the same thing about Jews in a speech, do you think Anglin would cover it?

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    , @Andrew A.
  24. @don't care

    I hate cell phones too and never had or used one till 18 months ago when i got a cheapie. There are just so many things you need a cell phone for nowadays. I hate it but that’s the world today.

    • Replies: @don't care
  25. @dogbumbreath

    When all else fails, the Empire uses false flag events.
    ********** ************************************************

    The widespread knowledge of false flags has made the world a dangerous place. America could bomb kiev and say russia did it. Russia will deny but there is no way to prove who did it.

  26. Memetics gone wild.

    • Replies: @Haxo Angmark
  27. Wokechoke says:
    @John Johnson

    There’s a Jew King in Kiev.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
  28. It’s that day.

  29. Obviously Russia knows that this is not a war of the Ukrainian people and that is why it avoids Western provocations to turn them into murderers of the Ukrainian population.

    All this thinking of a future where Russians and Ukrainians will have to live together and will not let themselves be dragged by the West into a massacre of Ukrainians to avoid hatred in the future.

    The West only thinks about money and does not care about human relations, that is the difference.

    • Agree: nokangaroos, Avery
  30. @Hang All Text Drivers

    I can’t imagine a compelling reason for one unless you’re like a plumber and people actually need to be able to contact you immediately throughout the day because their toilet or pipes exploded. For everything else you can survive without a cellphone, same as you did in the landline days.

  31. @John Johnson

    Russian vassal, NATO vassal, both look identical in the end. Independence was never an option.

  32. @Liborio Guaso

    “Russia says it has the right….” etc., etc.

    absolutely and for sure.

    but saying is not doing.

    first, it was “don’t you dare give Ukraine main battle tanks!”

    then Uncle Schmuel/NATO crossed that Red Line. Putin response: bomb Ukraine.

    then it was: “don’t you dare give Ukraine F16’s!”

    then Uncle Schmuel/NATO crossed that Red Line. Putin response: bomb Ukraine some more.

    then it was : “don’t you dare allow Ukraine to use US/NATO ballistic missiles to hit Russia!”

    and now Uncle Schmuel/NATO are crossing that Red Line day-after-day-day.

    Babyface Tsar”s response: bomb Ukraine some more using….gasp!!.…hypersonic weapon(s).

    it’s not wonder “western intel” doesn’t take Russian “we’ll nuke you!!” threats seriously.

  33. @Priss Factor

    and some more Trumpchump comic relief over @ http://zerohedge.com :

    “Did Trump Just Solve Border Crisis: Mexican President ‘Agreed to stop Migration Through Mexico, Trump Claims”

    Trumpstein + (((Claudia Scheinblum))),

    a match made in Jew-Heaven.

    • Agree: A_Hand_Hidden
  34. @Wokechoke

    There’s a Jew King in Kiev.

    Yes the Ukrainian president is Jewish. So is Putin’s chief propagandist and so was his private warlord until he died in a horrible accident. There are Jews on both sides.

    So what is the trade off here? Kill a few hundred thousand Orthodox men to try and remove him?

    Is that sound math to you?

    Should 100k Whites in America be killed to remove a comedian? How about Jon Stewart? Is that some sound White nationalist thinking?

  35. Andrew A. says:
    @John Johnson

    This guy lost me in the original post with “Putin’s a dictator blah, blah, blah.” In my experience, when someone leads with that stupidity, only hot air follows.

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
  36. Huge migration surge added almost a million people to UK population in a year: Extraordinary revised figures show inflow equivalent to two Leicester-sized cities – with the most arrivals from India, Nigeria, Pakistan, Zimbabwe and China

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14136253/Net-migration-year-June-Tories-numbers-working-visas.html

    But let’s push UK to the brink of WWIII over Ukraine.

    Everything that happens in UK is due to Anglos brownnosing and cucking to Jews.
    Jews want Anglos to hate Russia and support Ukraine. Anglos deliver.
    Jews want Anglos to welcome White Nakba. Anglos deliver.
    Jews want Afro-Colonization of White Wombs. Anglos deliver.

    Anglos are the biggest cuck maggots in history. They went from the most racial conscious Europeans to the least(when it comes to white preservation). The result is their total demise.
    Lose race-ism, lose your race. It’s really that simple.

  37. Having listened to two years of exaggerated claims about Russian military prowess, I don’t see Putin dropping nukes anywhere. Russia turns into an instant pariah nation and Russia is returned to a very primitive state.

    Let’s walk through some use cases:

    1) Russia drops one nuke on a military base. Now there’s radioactive fallout and mass casualties. The world ostracizes him. Is India, Brazil or China gonna hang in the BRICS orbit with the country that unleashed nukes? Nope.

    2) Russia blows up several European capitals. It’s game over. World ends and human population is radically reduced; Russia is probably turned into a slag heap. Russia will have chosen its destruction and possibly that of the world because conventional missiles were being fired at targets inside of their borders. Sounds really absurd.

    Russia’s best strategy and probably the one that is hidden in plain sight is to bankrupt the U.S. Add Zion Don’s massive deficits from his first administration with the Biden junta’s 500 billion dollars for just the Ukraine war plus all the other evil stuff they’ve been into, it’s game over. Yes, the U.S. will lash out in its death throes, but it makes absolutely no sense to break Sun Tzu’s command to never interfere with an enemy while he’s in the process of destroying himself.

    Russia is like the Arab nations; it doesn’t need to do anything besides let the crazies — world Jewry — destroy themselves. Well, the only thing is to build a better defense. For good reason, Russia has become peerless in air defense systems.

  38. yud-vile says:

    DONE DEAL:

    Russia Target Ukraine’s Western Weapons in Response to Kiev’s Strikes Deep Into Its Territory
    https://sputnikglobe.com/20241128/russia-target-ukraines-western-weapons-in-response-to-kievs-strikes-deep-into-its-territory-1121035740.html

    WATCH Russian rockets destroy US-made HIMARS launchers (VIDEO)
    https://www.rt.com/russia/608359-russia-us-himars-hit-ukraine/

    Russian rockets have destroyed three Ukrainian HIMARS launchers in Ukraine’s Sumy Region, according to a video provided by the Defense Ministry in Moscow.

    The “direct hit” by four Iskander missiles took out the US-supplied weapons and at least 30 personnel, the ministry claimed on Thursday on its official Telegram channel.

    Russian Defense Ministry reveals response to Ukrainian long-range strikes
    https://www.rt.com/russia/608371-response-ukrainian-long-range-strikes/

    Foreign instructors helping Kiev’s forces operate missiles and drones were among the targets, Moscow has said.

    The troops have struck the positions of ATACMS launchers and facilities hosting foreign instructors and mercenaries as part of their response, the ministry said on Telegram.

    TO BE CLEARER: 30 AMERICANS AND 9 FRENCH “INSTRUCTORS” WERE KILLED.

  39. ariadna says:
    @Mark in BC

    I don’t see why JJ is an ‘either or’ case. He qualifies for both

  40. @Ximenes

    Grotesque fatamerican par excellence Victoria Nuland–Nudelman is not someone you’d probably want to see in a bikini,

  41. @Mark in BC

    He’s what passes for intelligence in the US today. Iow, he’s both.

  42. Saggy says: • Website

    Does this seem actually insane to anyone? To just listen to Putin threatening to send nukes and then claim he’s too pussy to go through with it so they can do whatever they want to him?

    It doesn’t seem insane if your objective is to destroy Edom, … er, I mean the west. Now …. who in hell would want to do that .,.,.,.

    The Jews have dreamed of an east/west war destroying both since the time of Abravanel. The MAD doctrine has been abandoned and forgotten. Rabbis explain in this 1 hour vid


    Video Link
    and this 1 minute vid



    Video Link

  43. @don't care

    I use one, but I am not very good friends with it. Only to make a call here and there. I know folks whose whole lives are their cell phone. I don’t use internet on it for one.

  44. Wokechoke says:
    @Andrew A.

    At this point, if the Russians do kill off Zelenskyy certain (((establishments))) in the west will receive a body blow. Starmer for one but also Johnson. Badenoch will have to go too.

  45. While the miscalculations of the West mount up, Putin’s calculus has not changed. Those unwilling to read the writng on the wall will crash into it.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Andrew Anglin Comments via RSS