RSS
I simply cannot figure American liberals and “progressives”—’pwogwessives,’” as the late Alexander Cockburn used to call them.
They do nothing when faced with calamitous events and call it hard work. Then, when the political process (such as it is) takes a radical turn for the worse and there is serious work to do, they announce that they are exhausted and must “take a break” from it all.
And then they go off to Mexico City or Barbados or the Cotswolds.
Can’t figure it. When the going gets tough, liberals get… tickets to Santorini or Sicily.
I propose a brief investigation of the conduct of liberals during the Biden years and now, as Donald Trump takes office, not as a matter of ridicule, although at this point there is much in the culture of American liberalism that is ridiculous. No, my concern lies in the larger implications of what amounts to mass frivolity.
Liberals have never struck me as a very reliable lot. Their stated positions and “values”— a ridiculous word in its own right — are by tradition always of the highest order. But they so frequently and predictably cave to reaction.
Cold War liberals proved the worst in this regard: Ever prepared were they, whenever authentic political principles were challenged, to line up behind conservative Cold Warriors.
O.K., there is a long, unfortunate history here. But since the Clinton years in the 1990s, matters have taken another turn. Capitulation itself has become the position, the value.
This became perfectly obvious once Hillary Clinton — warmonger, interventionist, cultivator of coups, all-around authoritarian — assumed a prominent voice among liberal elites. Since the 2016 political season, and one can scarcely fail to notice, liberals have vigorously favored … wars, interventions, coups, censorship, a certain apple-pie authoritarianism.
They count the military and “the intelligence community”— a term that reflects the liberal embrace — their allies and friends. They are, in a phrase, the direct descendants of the Cold War liberals of decades past.
I have this acute urge to write the following sentence. American liberals trust the Central Intelligence Agency.
Clean, simple, bald and bold, irrefutable. Just seven words give a useful idea of how far things have gone. And you will know now what I mean by ridiculous.
The Biden regime’s four years in power and Trump’s election last November cause us to mix an alloy of ridiculous with critical, maybe even grave, as we characterize the culture of liberals.
We have witnessed in this period the collapse even of the weak, drowsy liberalism of the past. I see a qualitative difference I mean to say, between the liberalism of yore and what has become of liberalism these past years.
Liberalism as we find it out our windows seems now to consist of little more than performance and signifiers. You have posturing and authorized speech, and you have consumption patterns certified as a sort of semiology by way of liberal media.
Look at any day’s edition of The New York Times: What are effectively latter-day Good Housekeeping seals of approval—“T–shirts we love,” the right olive oil, “our favorite banana bread” — are considerably privileged above anything resembling serious news as measured in column inches.
And you have above all, the rest being subsets, a shockingly submissive worship of authority. And this, in turn, induces among liberals something between a refusal to act and an inability to act, a paralysis.
You could read liberalism’s slide in the direction of the supercilious in all those supposedly panicked cries as Trump’s momentum gathered during the 2024 political season. Fascist, tyrant, totalitarian, dictatorship, and above all, an existential threat to democracy: It was all very grave, historic in magnitude.
But I had to wonder what all the people saying these things were doing about so menacing a prospect as a second Trump term. I couldn’t find much; it was all signification. Saying was somehow sufficient, all that needed doing by way of political action.
Turning the matter another way, while there were great reservoirs of alarm about the prospect of a Trump presidency, and setting aside the principled minority who demonstrated on university campuses and elsewhere, liberals seemed to have little to say as Joe Biden dragged the United States into a genocide.
Where were these people? I still want to know.
It was good enough by way of action, it turned out, to pull the lever for Kamala Harris last Nov. 5 — this even as she endorsed Israeli terror as openly as the president.
Routines of Entitlement
I had to laugh after the election when a conservative commentator whose name I cannot recall wondered in print why all the liberals flinging around “fascist,” “dictator,” “tyrant,” and so on hadn’t taken to the hills in the manner of the old French maquisards — you know, the wartime guerrillas who gave up work and family to wage armed actions and sabotage ops against the Nazi Wehrmacht from mountain hideouts where they subsisted on leaves and weeds.
Such a vacuum of silence and what amounts to indolence.
Ridiculous is as ridiculous does not, I say. How can you take seriously people who tell you that they now live under a fascist dictatorship while going about their business entirely per usual?
Maybe the word I seek is infantilization — the infantilization of liberalism. Is there a better term for what has become of liberals since Trump’s ascendancy?
At the very moment, according to the liberal narrative, political action of a great variety is urgent in the cause of saving our republic, the new liberal consensus, born of a shared “exhaustion,” is that it is time to “tune out,” or “take a break,” or simply close one’s eyes and ears.
How many news reports have I read to this effect? Politico: “The resistance is not coming to save you. It’s tuning out.” The Associated Press: “Americans are exhausted by political news. TV ratings and a new poll show they’re tuning out.”
And from The New York Times: “Certain kinds of left-leaning, reflective New Yorkers declare… they were drained, exhausted, resigned, ready to choose a plaintive ignorance.”
I just love the Times some mornings. Reflective New Yorkers — left-wing, of course — retreating honorably into ignorance. You just can’t beat this kind of thing.
Bingeing on chocolate, watching British crime dramas morn ’til night, people wearing themselves out on treadmills: Move over to social media and you discover all sorts of close-to-the-ground modes of escape. And then, of course, you have the virtuous travelers.
You have to have clearance to indulge in this kind of thing, let us be clear. You have to have the sanction of a new liberal consensus, and these come thick and fast nowadays, a new consensus every time you look. Worry not, liberals: the Times is once again here for you.
This is Charles Blow, the arch-liberal Times columnist, in a piece that appeared in the Dec. 18 editions under the headline, “Temporarily Disconnected from Politics?”:
“Should anyone feel guilt for choosing not to constantly ruminate or pre-emptively panic? For choosing to take a breath and a beat before re-engaging in the fight… that is almost surely in the offing once Donald Trump returns to power?
Absolutely not.”
Re-engaging with the fight? What fight was that? He must mean voting the “Joy and Vibes” ticket in the polling booth last November. I gather from all this it was exhausting.
The now evident consensus — see what I mean? Another one — is that so long as the liberal American feels the right feelings, the approved feelings, it is sufficient: There is no need actually to do anything. Nothing can be permitted to break the liberal’s routines of entitlement.
And we find, too, a flat refusal to address or even acknowledge the half of America that, having put Donald Trump in office, does not conform to the liberal version of reality.
This is what I read in the sudden impulse to travel: It is a flinch, a turning away, nothing more. Anything to avoid recognizing the grievances of the non-liberal majority, anything to avoid facing the true composition of the American polity, anything to protect the liberal bubble from a puncture.
How did it come to this? Again, I cannot figure it. Scholars now debate the future of American liberalism and whether it can be salvaged or salvage itself to serve some useful purpose in the polity. I cannot figure this, either.
I do not like to think of liberals as representative of anyone other than themselves, but to the extent they may reflect anything close to prevailing sentiment in America their conduct of late saddens me. Are we a nation so pathetic as they?
Are we lost, as they seem to be, in memes and narrative dreams that seal us protectively from reality and relieve us of all responsibility to act?
English
Arabic
Chinese (Simplified)
Dutch
French
German
Hebrew
Hindi
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Russian
Spanish
Swedish
Turkish
Vietnamese
there are no liberals, as they were replaced with neoliberals, just as conservatives were replaced by neoconservatives. there is no left, left. the left, all left and what passes for left, is actually right of center.
the old conservatives like eisenhower and even nixon, were more liberal than today’s progressives, as they now like to be referred. while we may still have two wings, they are both to the right of center, today’s “liberals” are bigger warmongers than today’s “conservatives”. like a bird deformed by agent orange, it cannot fly, much the same as a man, with two left feet, cannot dance.
It’s clear that compliant members of the synthetic (D) faction are facing severe cognitive dissonance. They knuckled under for the crime against humanity of medical experimentation under ulterior constraint and coercion. Twenty-some percent of the ones who aren’t dead are injured, or shockingly aged and frail.
https://vigilantfox.news/p/the-unvaccinated-will-be-vindicated?autoPlay=true
The trusted the (D) front of the CIA mad scientists. Just meeting the people who saw it coming and refused are an intolerable rebuke. They’ve got to reformulate identities other than dupe.
The “liberals” are busy lining up to kiss Trump’s ass.
In 1791 President Washington wrote to encourage a delegation of Catholics, then a despised minority in WASP America, “I hope ever to see America in the forefront of justice and liberality.” In that era, liberalism had smashed the power of Absolutism, celebrating for the first time the value of the individual. The United States was founded as the first liberal government in history, “on the natural authority of the people alone”, freed from the traditional oppression of the church-state alliance. But over time liberalism became corrupted by a new economic scheme called capitalism. In the nineteenth century liberalism evolved into a reactionary movement to defuse the revolutionary radicalism that was the true continuance of the Spirit of ’76. Modern liberalism is at heart about the preservation of property rights and the status quo. Elements of progressivism exist in the public platform of liberalism, but liberal elites fight just as vigorously as conservatives to see that these goals are never achieved in a way that infringes on their privileged social and economic status. The elephant in the liberal living room is the embarrassing reality that capitalist society is and must be organized on the exploitation of one class by another.
Back in the civil rights era, the black radical Eldridge Cleaver well defined the modern liberal as a mixture of jive and bullsh*t. This song from that long-ago era sums it up the liberal’s dilemma https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3cdqQ2BdgOA
Video Link
There just aren’t a lot of middle-management; paper-shuffling; and media, entertainment, and commentariat type jobs left anymore (for humanities graduates especially).
So political patronage or NGO sinecures, and government or business DEI bullsh*t jobs, are some of the only forms of gainful employment that are left for many “liberals.”
Morally toothless liberals aren’t going to bite the hand that feeds them.
Read on one blog yesterday the a Fed DC employee was scared on how to use LinkedIn or Monster to get a job if he lost his. He admitted he had no skills outside of the position he’s had for 11 years. What was it?
“Sourcing mosquito netting for indigent tropical nations.”
He also noted he wasn’t a “bureaucrat”. DUH.
He can learn to pick fruit. But not cotton. Seriously, Mississippi State (my Alma Mater) has a Beta Prototype of an AI cotton picking robot.
Liberalism is and always has been a post-hoc ideological justification for rule by capitalist oligarchs. This includes both “right” and “left” liberalism. It’s not meant to be consistent or make sense. When that oligarchy comes under threat, all of the former liberal pretenses and platitudes are discarded, revealing the inner workings of the machine. This process is not “liberalism losing its way” or anything like that, but liberalism functioning as it was intended to function.
I appreciate this article and several of the comments.
Another factor to consider is the notable inclination to conformity of self-styled “Progressives.” (I avoid conversing with them about politics, but in my limited experience they seem to have stampeded away from “liberal.”) Much of the virtue sniveling over the latest Most Important Election Ever noted by the author is just another example of people trying to stay within C. S. Lewis’s inner ring — they really don’t think critically or much care about anything beyond fitting in. Trump allows them to hide from their cowardice over things like Palestine or the COVID dempanic.
This plays into the use of politics to keep dissent channeled and periodically blown off through people voting at each other over issues inconsequential to the Establishment.
Where have all the Liberals gone? Hopefully into hibernation for the next 4 years or more.
I don’t use the term liberal anymore. People that I remember as liberals were still largely sane even if their ideas about things like building a welfare state or leniency toward criminals were completely wrong. They have largely been replaced by Neo-Marxists who are lunatics that support ideas that are based on brainwashing and conditioning such as craziness like trans rights, mutilating children sexually, open borders, hatred of Western civilization, and anti-Whiteness. You can’t have that in your country because unlike the old liberalism, the goal is to completely destroy it.
It seems young ones were Seth-Riched into silence.
“You know what happens to rats like seth rich?”
Good thing Snowden ran.
Video Link
English translation: revolutionaries don’t want to abolish oppression, they want to become the oppressors.
All of my liberal friends and acquaintances have, as of January 20, ghosted me to death with their silence.
This follows years of arrogant sneering condescension over my support of conservatism and of Donald Trump (not the same).
During the campaign (featuring the shift from the brain-dead to the never-had-a-brain) I got very angry reactions to my voiced opinions and bumper stickers.
From the election to the Inauguration, it was a kind of sheepish avoidance of all pertinent conversations.
Now, they’re punishing me with their absolute silence.
Fascinating people, the liberals.
COVID dempanic — I love it! I’m going to file that one away for future use.
Liberalism more resembles a collective neurosis than a true ideology, doesn’t it!
Liberalism never existed, it was just another thought bubble pacifier for the great unwashed masses.
The media and pop culture are the great pacifiers of the brain, the news, Hollywood, the media in general is stuffed into your eyes and ears from birth to stop you thinking.
The biggest problem for any “elite” is, how do we maintain control and extract work out of all those below at the same time as keeping our privilege at the top, where the “elite” don’t have to work?
The not having to work is the easy part, the “elite” control the money supply and it’s backed by an army…but how do you convince the masses it’s fair? To be in constant war with the masses will not do because privileges enjoyed must be deferred while the war continues…enter pop culture and the media, filling minds with novelty and drivel, such things as Hoola hoops, video games and the hourly news bulletin that leads you nowhere.
So unless people can remove themselves from the opiate of the masses, nothing will change in the structure of power, majority will be reduced to spectators in their own lives, powerless to do anything meaningful.
He could write code for AI companies !?
The liberal fascists, particularly the feminazis ENRAGED that he defeated their bitch goddess, Clinton, made Trump. He’s the final trump, too, the clarion calling the Yankee Doodles to their final jamboree, where wild imaginings replace all facts and rationality. He’s like Reagan, my favourite US President as he started the process of the Great Unravelling of the Real Evil Empire, on ice.
The choice of Kamala, a gormless, talentless, cipher, chosen by Bidet because the prospect of her Presidency if Bidet was removed under the Idiocy Clause of the Constitution, was too wretched to contemplate, hence she became a humanish shield to his decline, sealed the deal. You’d almost think that the Real State wants a final blow-out led by a blow-hard, before we all go into that good night. I still think that some Real State faction, or the Ukronazis, or perhaps the Danish, will off Trump. He’s just too delicious a target.
Liberalism is just libertarianism kidding itself, and seeking to fool the serfs.
A ‘liberal’ is a bourgeois having he, she or itself on. I may be greedy and needy, but I’m, I’m, I’m…..vegan!
Don’t sink into total despair. Come back in a thousand years and it might be back to the paleolithic. You never know. I have learned to softly chuckle when I hear someone say the word “we” in the context of some postulated future. How can “we” do anything when there is no “we” anymore?
Actually, a more likely post-downfall future would be worldwide feudalism and warlord rule. For many of the world’s people this condition would be preferable to the order we have today even if they were part of the lower strata of a feudal order. A feudal order represents the world of the known for most of the human race. For them it would mean the end of the hated “machine” and life in society where the cognitive order and the social order are much the same thing.
I have long postulated that there would be certain basic technological survivals though under these conditions. There would still be intercontinental oceanic travel. There could still be printing. There could still be telegraphy, which is really pretty low tech. Interestingly, there could be wireless spark gap telegraphy, which would mean that there could still be real time communication across continents and oceans at least between major centers.
Under these conditions, populations would be smaller. Lifespans would be shorter. Few people would have any education. Social mobility would be extremely limited to non-existent. Few people would ever travel much beyond the place of their birth. As is always the case in this kind of world, knowledge would be preserved in the monasteries.
No way to prove that this will not be humanity’s future. If anything, it’s more likely than a future out among the stars. Darn, the stars are awfully far apart. Feudalism and warlord rule are things that have already existed in this world. There is no barrier to them existing again. The barrier is between the present and the postulated hyper-technic future. Really, we don’t know for sure if it even can exist.
There were no Liberals as such. Until recently, People called Barack Obama, Tony Blair, the Clintons, Johnny Howard, among others, “Liberals.” They were extremist war criminals who espoused ugly nationalism and racism.
.
Liberals are petit-bourgeois. See Søren Kierkegaard.
That is what liberals are.
😄
Roughly speaking, the neolibs harbor a lust for money, and the neocons a lust for blood. The neolibs are market bolsheviks and the neocons Blut-und-Eisen fascists. They are both mostly lead by Jews or Jewish types. The neolibs’ market tools are international organizations, IMF, WEF, etc. and non-governmental organizations. The neocons’ blood tools are everything from the blade to the bomb, from animal sacrifice in a rebuilt temple to the annihilation of Amalek.
It’s often hard to tell them apart. Applying George Galloway’s anatomical metaphor, they are two cheeks of the same backside. In dark times like we are now going through, it seems we are stuck in the middle.
Consider the years since 2016 as a campaign.
2014 — Obama declares himself Dictator of USA during his “pen and phone” speech.
2016 — Trump elected, Swamp/Obama mounts counteroffensive and largely neutralizes Trump, as they had Reagan.
2020 — Swamp/Obama retains dictatorship, attacks Trump supporters at 1/6 event, declares Trump supporters illegal and a arrests many of them. Attempts lawfare against billionaire Trump. Swamp/Obama proceeds to torture those arrested until 2025. Living standards fall as Swamp/Obama prove unable to govern US and attempts to dismiss the US electorate and appoint another fail. Trump stalls lawfare and organizes Trump coalition.
Late 2024/early 2025 — Trump wins Presidential election, executes an extremely effective offensive against Swamp/Obama coalition, attempts to secure assets within the Western Hemisphere and the Arctic, perhaps in preparation to withdrawal from Europe and Asia. Swamp/Obama coalition surprised and finds that it has effectively no support among the US electorate.
Past 2025/01: Trump’s offensive will eventually exhaust itself, because offensive always do that. Further, Trump will meet opponents who have had time to prepare and are not of primary concern to the USA. EU, People’s Republic of China, Russian Federation, India, are examples. At this point things become conjectural.
The US has no trans-hemisphere expeditionary capability as of 2025/01. No existing nation has expeditionary capability at transcontinental range as of 2025/01. The US and Japan have blue water Navies, Australia is developing a nuclear submarine capability (useful for blue water ocean denial). That might be the foundation of an Oceanic power centered around the US and Australia, but only if the US reorganizes its Navy/Marines and its shipbuilding capabilities.
Trump can, at this point, successfully abandon the Eastern Hemisphere. Domestic political fallout would be minimal. US abandonment of Afghanistan is an Obama/Swamp operation that lets Trump blame such a withdrawal as the result of Obama/Swamp ineptitude. The US electorate is now concerned primarily with the Western hemisphere (and primarily with immigration from same), and does not want to fight yet another war in which a war-weary USA further self-destructs.
Trumps long term goal seems (IMHO) to be a disengagement from what has become a useless and draining US Empire. In large part, the Swamp/Obama coalition is a direct result of the US Empire. As was said after WW II, the US is primarily an agricultural/business country, and has the wrong sociology for an Imperial power, or even an Imperial Suzerain. Disengaging from Eastasia and Eurasia before the demands of Empire or the loss of Empire destroys US sociology and transforms the country along the lines of the Swamp/Obama coalition’s rejected rule is the only way to keep the US society that elected Trump.
And we end up with Oceania, East Asia, and Eurasia. With any luck at all, these three will be fully involved with internal troubles for several decades.
Do they fit in the definition of Liberal(s)?
“The United States was founded as the first liberal government in history, ‘on the natural authority of the people alone’”
Oh, Bullshit. Give it a rest.
Yes. We certainly behave in such a manner.
Liberals have always been sanctimonious hypocrites in need of adult supervision. That is not new. Liberals everywhere are a danger to themselves and others for their refusal to deal with reality in an honest manner. Cloaking oneself in virtue while living a life of selfishness and ignorance is the general formula for liberal behaviour.
What is different today is the almost total absence of worthwhile people, either conservatives or liberals, with intelligence and integrity to point out clearly how corrupt the West has become. Devoid of both intelligence and purpose, people today wander aimlessly through our modern wasteland of sports ball and fake spirituality. worshippers of the golden calf.
The West is dying today from a lack of integrity.
Joe Biden as president was emblematic of our abysmal state.
An interesting article, but only mildly so, since the phenomena Mr. Lawrence writes about are scarcely of earth shattering significance.
The reader begins to think, “This guy sure likes to write. Probably became a habit with him. Had to scrape the bottom of the barrel to find a topic this time though, didn’t he, haha.”
Now, Mr. Lawrence’s ‘phenomena.’
This was before the election, during the campaign. The libs did say a lot. They deafened us with shrieks of ‘He’s a threat to our democracy.’
Mr. Lawrence seems to expect more “by way of political action.” What? He doesn’t say. He does tell us what the libs did after losing the election.
Again he seems to suggest that libs should ‘do’ more, but fails to say what.
Anyway, Mr. Lawrence raises a good question. What should citizens, liberal or conservative, do before or after an election?
Maybe they should take to heart something a candidate for Texas state governor said around a campfire a good many years ago:
The “definition of liberal” is also part of the deception designed to mask the reality of liberalism in practice. As I wrote above in comment #7, liberalism has always been about maintaining capitalist oligarchy. The reality of liberalism is out of sync with the presentation or idea of liberalism, and it’s supposed to be that way. The ability of liberalism to obscure the center of power and the operations of power is viewed as a desirable feature of liberalism.
What happened to the Liberals?
Jews pulled the plug on their money after Gaza.
The Battle of UCLA Royce Hall then settled the matter as the cops looked on while the IDF LA Branch steamed into the protest camp.
“the old conservatives like eisenhower”
What did Eisenhower conserve, exactly? Because it wasn’t states’ rights. He was the president who ordered school integration by holding white students at gunpoint.
Eisenhower also promoted the lampshades, shrunken heads, and tattooed skin lies in order to justify the massive loss of American life in Europe during WWII, which also served as the kicking off of his political career.
This author belongs on Zerohedge. This is pure Uniparty cuckolding.
******** Where have all the Independents gone? **********
Where will all those that supported Trump but are already facing dissapointment Go?
( Clear examples- “Hook & Bullet ” constituency,conservation/enviro,public lands policy,growth management et al- insights absent from UNZ reviews…)
Did “Liberals” lose control of a comatose public?
If the lowest and worse in a nation can become it’s leaders,what does the replacement of “Liberals” reveal? A shift to higher and better,or lower and worse…..
I wish somebody, anybody, would say……………..Forgiveness, you bet! Those UN displaced person tents full of families in the middle of nowhere…………….go home. We dumped you here to get your land and now 30 years later, you can go home. We’re going home so you can too.
george is a very eloquent cat, he really has a way with words. i loved when he said, little rishi sunak, was in the fag end of his prime ministership, lol 😂. too bad we can’t have a party completely comprised of george galloways, maybe then we wouldn’t be stuck in the middle of two disgusting ass cheeks.
Never count out the liberals. They are the political preference of Jews everywhere except Israel and activist. Jews and many non-Jews are agenda liberals, such as politicians. They will lie, cheat and steal to get the control they what. Sincere liberals are destructive in some ways but in other ways not. Yet, they are all intellectually dishonest and damaging to society.
Then we have the ultra-white fundamentalists who don’t even know what a train wreck they are.
Very good. Liberalism needs its formation among the bourgeois. It’s the suburban comfort zone of the zombie culture.
“there is no left, left. the left, all left and what passes for left, is actually right of center.”
Ever so true. There has basically been no left since 1980. The European left lasted a little longer, but also started going south by the late 80s. Now there’s no left left in the West.
Right on. Show theses pansies a nasty, genocide and a land grab in the Mid East and all they worry about is some poor Jew being called a “materialist”.
they are neoliberals, that are also closeted neocons. clinton was the point the two merged into one and it’s been the uniparty ever since. george h.w. bush gave birth to this hideous abomination, when he threw the 92 election, to his favorite cia asset son, slick willie.
yugoslavia was the beginning of the pnac zioneocon empire, that has ruled ever since. we no longer have presidents, now we have emperors and trumpigula is our finest example, he really understands the difference and you can see it, in the way he rules.
Overheard barista chatter.
Bread & circuses (politics). It’s kabuki theater. In plain English, politics is the primary control mechanism, replacing religion. Leading eventually to nwo, one world government (no matter which religion you are). A continuation and expansion of the crony-corporatism that created government for that end. True capitalism & liberty is the antithesis of what we have now. As long as fiat (not real money) is the rule, capitalism will only exist in small scale. Fiat keeps you purchasing from the company store on the reservation, the ultimate control mechanism.
And there is plenty to peck at, there… Lol
Liberals are women. This helps explain everything.
Women always trust the power structure in charge. They “lean in” to power – always have, always will.
Yes – women have always been subservient to the patriarchy, as it is in their best interest. For the last century, the patriarchy was liberal-democracy-capitalism, the last surviving ideology (“end of history”). They supported it unquestionably. Women have always latched onto the dominant man, which is why conquering tribes didn’t need to kill them.
Yes, there is a better word – the feminization of liberalism. They appear infantile to us because of the Christian hierarchy of God, man, woman, child. These liberal women are rudderless right now, and thus they take on the characteristics of infants.
The author really can’t seem to ” figure out” that both parties are subservient to aipac. He can’t seem to figure out that whites of all political stripes are kept in the dark about real issues while allowed to fight over acceptable ones in a political binary. He can’t seem to figure out that whites aren’t allowed to organize, and if they try to, the organization will be mocked, led stray and/or completely subverted before it even gets off the ground. If he looks carefully, he will see that this exact same phenomenon occurs with the so-called, right. We’ve had plenty of events/issues that have happened over the last year that would be a perfect lightning rod for organizing politically, and yet it never really materializes and just fizzles out regardless of which of the two sides that you are allowed to be on and still receive any news coverage.
That being said, this relatively short article can be distilled down to a few quality paragraphs that do make a good point:
“They do nothing when faced with calamitous events and call it hard work. Then, when the political process (such as it is) takes a radical turn for the worse and there is serious work to do, they announce that they are exhausted and must “take a break” from it all.”
“Liberals have never struck me as a very reliable lot. Their stated positions and “values”— a ridiculous word in its own right — are by tradition always of the highest order. But they so frequently and predictably cave to reaction.”
“This became perfectly obvious once Hillary Clinton — warmonger, interventionist, cultivator of coups, all-around authoritarian — assumed a prominent voice among liberal elites. Since the 2016 political season, and one can scarcely fail to notice, liberals have vigorously favored … wars, interventions, coups, censorship, a certain apple-pie authoritarianism.”
(Liberals used to be unbiasedly, anti-censorship and anti-war. That completely flipped with one administration. While signs of it may have been showing before, there were no cries to invade countries or to constantly shut everything down when Jews begin to feel uncomfortable. If these phenomenon were there, They weren’t overt until Biden’s term. This is where they seem to turn on a dime with no eyebrows raised, because peer pressure is everything to liberals)
“Liberalism as we find it out our windows seems now to consist of little more than performance and signifiers. You have posturing and authorized speech, and you have consumption patterns certified as a sort of semiology by way of liberal media.”
(Because as we all know, “liberals” own the media and want to make it illegal for saying so… /s)
“And you have above all, the rest being subsets, a shockingly submissive worship of authority. ”
“Ridiculous is as ridiculous does not, I say. How can you take seriously people who tell you that they now live under a fascist dictatorship while going about their business entirely per usual?”
“You have to have clearance to indulge in this kind of thing, let us be clear. You have to have the sanction of a new liberal consensus, and these come thick and fast nowadays, a new consensus every time you look. Worry not, liberals: the Times is once again here for you.”
“The now evident consensus — see what I mean? Another one — is that so long as the liberal American feels the right feelings, the approved feelings, it is sufficient: There is no need actually to do anything. Nothing can be permitted to break the liberal’s routines of entitlement.”
It looks like the author just needs to learn more about the Jewish piece of the puzzle if he is to finally make sense of it all.
Nothing will truly make sense if They are allowed to remain ignorant about that very important piece of the puzzle.
A perfect description: “Bingeing on chocolate, watching British crime dramas morn ’til night, people wearing themselves out on treadmills” to which the problem is a total disconnect from reality particularly as this is a description of ‘alienation’ that stems from an identification with the ‘pleasure dome’ of consumerist titilations that can only condone the ever widening specter of alienated activities such that appeasing the eunuch’s of the professional classes that harbor genocidal rage exemplified by Tony Blinken and Zelenski’s smirk…
This may be of help relative to a wider analysis of the problem…
http://www.wlym.com/archive/campaigner/Campaigners1968-76/00TextFiles/SexImpotPSP00wfigs.pdf
As I’ve pointed out several times recently on Substack, the chief feature (as Gurdieff would say) of American politicians is simply, simple, laziness. What was once jokingly attributed to civil servants, like Post Office employees, is now the modus non-operandi of Senators and presidents.
For example, when was the last time Congress passed an actual budget? Or declared a war?
Unsurprisingly, the Treasury Dept.’s top honcho resigned rather than face the indignity of a DOGE audit. It’s now been discovered that Treasury officials have never declined a payment request, sitting in their offices, feet on the desk, Homer Simpson style for their entire (well-paid) careers.
“The @DOGE team discovered, among other things, that payment approval officers at Treasury were instructed always to approve payments, even to known fraudulent or terrorist groups,” said Musk in a Friday night tweet.
“They literally never denied a payment in their entire career.”
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/treasury-depts-highest-ranking-career-official-rage-quits-after-musks-doge-team-probes
My take on things is that “Communism,” “Fascism,” “Nazism,” “Socialism” and the Capitalism on steroids that we now have here in the USA ALL lead to a One-World, fascist government, where there will be a few at the top who own and control everything. And the remaining individuals (that is, the ones who are allowed to live) will be their slaves. All of the “isms” working toward the same thing, just different methods on how to get there.
For that we can thank human nature – the over-riding will of individuals to want to own and to control everything and everyone.
Thank you.
‘I just love the Times some mornings.’ — Patrick Lawrence
Despite its sarcastic flavor, this revealing confession goes far toward explaining why Patrick Lawrence declines to butt his head against the invisible walls of his confining Overton window, even when he tries to sound a little iconoclastic.
Who cares what happens to liberals? As Lawrence admits, they got into bed with the corrupt fourth (intel) branch of government, which inter alia interfered with the 2020 election by dismissing Hunter Biden’s incriminating laptop as ‘Russian tradecraft.’
Merely stripping these 50 saboteurs of their security clearance doesn’t go far enough. Election interference is a crime. All should be in custody, awaiting arraignment. And Lawrence should be in Santorini, suntanned, drink in hand, gazing at his navel in feckless wonderment.
This is nothing to do with Liberalism. This is Jewish morality which is compassion-based and universalist. It’s basically what Jesus taught. Jesus taught a new Jewish morality to replace the old rules-based moral codes. “Christians” warped his message. Probably because they subconsciously realized that following that path is self-abnegating.
Eisenhauer was very tricky. Not a good president of your federated states.
Many are fooled by his image in fireside chats, it was all an act.
I, as non-U.S., used to be fooled by his statement on the threat of the military-industrial complex.
If he really meant it, why did he do nothing about it as U.S. President?
He really was a made man, He started as a lowly Colonel, then suddenly
became Supreme Commander, through no efforts or skills of his own.
He redefined German prisoners of war to place them outside the Geneva Conventions, and presided over the deaths of at least a million of them, possibly over two million, by leaving them corraled outdoors in mud in winter, and ordering anyone trying to get food to them shot.
A truly evil and barely competent man. I have little doubt that he was at least complicit in, and possibly gave the orders for, the assassination of Patton.
Then there was Operation Keelhaul, to send any anti-Soviet prisoners of war from the U.S.S.R. back to inevitable execution or work to death in the GULAGs.
Much more.
What he did in the U.S. as president, is not at all surprising if we consider what he had already done in Europe.
Ghali – there is no conflict between Liberalism and ugly nationalism and racism. The “founding fathers” of liberalism all (or almost all) accepted both those things as entirely natural and had no plans to end them.
The liberal version of reality is unreality. And if they didn’t have double standards, they would have no standards at all. Who will rid us of these useless, self-righteous fools?
The U.S. definition of ‘liberal’ is very different from the definitions anywhere else.
The orginal was ‘free trade and individual freedom.’
The U.S. definition became ‘Frankfurt Jewish Schule and Lukacs (Lukacs also a pen-name to cover his roots)’ neo-Marxism.
Nothing to do with classical liberalism, not that any party anywhere else claims a connection to the original definition now.
Since offensives always do that, could you give us some examples?
There are no liberals, no progressives, no conservatives, no communists, no socialists, no nihilists, no fascists, no democrats, no republicans, no catholics, no atheists, no protestants, no muslim, no christians. Never have been. No pontificating knucklehead can change that.
There are only Rational, and Irrational. Always have been.
TUR needs to add a WTF? for response options to comments like this one.
Seriously, WTF?
Where the libbies?
They’re remembering the hollowcost.
This is a set of interesting observations.
It’s very important that Trump actually gets rid of the Jews running the departments. Most of the cattle in these departments were probably living in fear of the yid directors and only mouthing agreement to simply get on with making a living.
Liberals are aware that they’ve been caught out by Zionism.
I disagree. The American liberal was the lickspittle of the Jew. The Shabbos Goy.
Just as much as Paul Ryan or Mitch Romney as Bill Clinton and Joe Biden.
Let’s say they felt constrained by the Jewish Reality.
Wondering about Liberals is like wondering about termites – termites are termites – it’s the hypocrite conservatives where our problems lie – they’re the most useless political entity ever created. Don’t think so?
What have they ever conserved? I know – I thought I was one – https://crushlimbraw.blogspot.com/2025/01/the-conservative-rock-star-vox-popoli.html?m=0 – but it wasn’t until I discovered conservatives are unprepared for REALITY, that my eyes were opened.
For the truly pivotal tasks only the naive are groomed into a commanding position in order to avoid an appearance of illegal meddling and steering of the seemingly spontaneous events beyond human control :
Alex Hamilton, Abe Lincoln, Woodrow Wilson, Frank Roosevelt, Dwight Eisenhower, Lyndon Johnson, Jimmy Carter, George Bush, Bill Clinton, Nancy Pelosi, Donald Trump, et al.
Liberals? Conservatives? All bull shit. All controlled by the international Jew agenda.
When the interests of international Jewry are questioned they all tow the line. The MSM is an easy, clear example. Fox-supposedly right and CNN-supposedly left, both spew the same Zionist party line.
Revolt has to happen or Armageddon. Insanity Fair.
Nah, the “liberals” are ready to bend over an Ottoman and be throttled.
I thought that was a picture of Pacific Palisades?
Jon Fogerty must have Ralphed his lunch after reading this…
It’s amazing how many words someone can spend to only barely make the vaguest of points.
Perhaps this is a use for LLMs after all, and that’s to give us a one-sentencer for crap like this.
That is a problem that lots of people would like to have …
Be nice and ask them how they like them apples, to get the conversation going 😉
Think of it as a blessing, not a punishment. Silence is bliss.
You don’t have to hear their demented screeching about their woke and DEI fantasies.
That’s something I’d not thought of. At the time I was a bit puzzled that the electorate did not stick with the devil it knew, as usual.
The problem with gorgeous George is that he’s a soft Islamist
What kind of nonsense is this.
The West is riddled with Critical Theory which is just Bolshevism with an added anti white genocidal twist.
ghali many times I don’t agree with you but as Aristotle once said many moons ago, “It is the mark of an educated mind to entertain a thought without accepting it.” Now I agree with you that these wimps who never served in combat like billy boy clinton who didn’t go fight in Vietnam in the 1960’s even though he was eligible were and probably still are bloodthirsty psychopathic scum.
You made me look into that one, and besides the small payout, it does seems a bit too difficult: https://www.historynet.com/was-patton-murdered/
This is very accurate, mate.
Agreed. I have been reading about Voltaire and the Enlightenment recently. Long story short – these subversives had a love for liberalism and its basis in rationality, science, tolerance, and equality; and a deep-seated hatred for Christianity, as exemplified by their battle cry of “ecrafez l’infame!”, or “crush the wretch!”. They took over academia, infiltrated the Catholic Church, and developed an influence campaign with world leaders. They flooded the booksellers with huge numbers of anti-Christian propaganda pieces whose distribution Voltaire described thusly:
Enlightenment ideas were developed and pushed not primarily by jews, but by anti-Christian modernists who sought the subversion of the western project that had hitherto been steered by Christendom. Interestingly, Voltaire also enlisted jewish help with the subversion. Here is from one letter dated from 1763:
Jews, women, and liberals have long been intertwined parties.
the false paradigm between red v blue, liberal v conservation, snake v rat, was never real. It was all a (((media))) generated psyop. And while this psyop was used to gridlock our chaotic, runaway, insane social system, what was happening behind the scene? The country went further into debt, the wall street scams continued unabated, our military was hijacked to slaughter woman and children everywhere, tens of millions of catholic spics (controlled by the vatican) flooded the country, and jews consolidated their collective power over government, courts, corporations, etc.
btw…Don’t notice that none of these traitorous politicians are for term limits.
Falling for the L&R labeling is just cultish bullshit. We have a damn immovable uninformed center, AKA the silent majority, stuck in their roles as parrots and outraged citizens of whatever herd they follow.
Miraculously, some have jumped ship and actually met somewhere on common ground. That’s why Trump got picked, too much movement behind him from disillusioned followers of fashion, er-pointed sticks, er-politics. And now here comes the real shit show: the pushback and obstructionism that dashes hopes and protects the bribery.
But not all of us believe the world starts and ends with current political dramas. The tough thing that people hate to hear no matter where they stand is that rhetoric almost never matches record. Where we go from here doesn’t take a crystal ball. If you don’t like the agendas of the scum in office – Do Not Comply.
better than being a hard zionist. george has always stood up for the working class and opposed zionism, how many have the stones to do that? not jeremy corbin, that’s for sure. google george’s senate testimony, when the idiots subpoenaed him, thinking he wouldn’t show up, he spanked the lot of them, they were so sore, when he was done, they couldn’t sit down for a week.
It’s amazing how many people in my community would rather bend over an Ottoman than stand up for themselves and not comply with illegal projections by govmnt.
Mammon Worshipers all.
Was the author of this article expecting liberals/progressives to demonstrate some allegiance to principle? Where has he been for the past 50 years? The only principle the left has ever had is the one so well articulated by Frank Herbert:
But two of these categories are redeemable.
george w. was a complete idiot but george h.w. was a very devious ratfucker. after running the show for 8 years from the white house basement, he had 4 years in the oval office. this was his chance to control both parties in perpetuity.
old george was the head of the c.i.a. under ford and slick willy was a c.i.a. asset since his college days as a rhodes scholar at oxford, spying on the antiwar movement. when he came back they made him governor of arkansas, to protect the c.i.a.’s airport, that was their drug distribution center, to fund their black ops.
no major democratic candidate wanted to run against a sitting president, especially after the first iraq war. the 7 democratic candidates were referred to by the press as the 7 dwarfs, because they had such low profiles and were unknown to most voters. who would suspect a rigged election, when the “loser” accepted the results. when gore was robbed of the 2000, election, slick willy did nothing and in fact even remarked, “am i the only one who likes both al gore and george bush?”. the answer was yes.
Back in the day, I used to think of myself as a liberal individual, with social tendencies. Since both segments have been highjacked and turned into something I can’t [or even refuse] to identify with, I now think of myself as a humanist, because I still care about people [very much in general].
Liberals have outlived their usefulness for the jewish elite.
Here is ChatGPT summary in one sentence (my style);
The so-called American “liberal” has degenerated into a spineless, performative husk—paralyzed by its own self-satisfied moral posturing, worshipping the state security apparatus it once opposed, and retreating into consumerist escapism the moment real political struggle becomes necessary.
The American liberal has completed its transformation into a creature of pure cowardice and self-delusion. Once, at least, they pretended to care about civil liberties, war crimes, and the excesses of the security state. Now, they have not only surrendered but actively cheerlead for the very forces they once claimed to oppose. They trust the CIA, they wave the flag of endless war, and they obediently repeat the slogans handed to them by intelligence agencies and corporate media. The so-called “resistance” to Trump turned out to be nothing more than a desperate plea for more surveillance, more censorship, and more interventionism—all in the name of “saving democracy.” The irony would be laughable if it weren’t so pathetic.
But it’s worse than mere hypocrisy—liberalism has become a performance, a pantomime of virtue signaling that substitutes consumer choices for actual political action. The “right” olive oil, the “correct” tote bag, the latest New York Times–approved banana bread recipe—these are now the pillars of liberal identity. The pages of their preferred media outlets overflow with meaningless lifestyle fluff while anything resembling real political discourse is buried under layers of euphemistic nonsense. They cry about “fascism” while sipping overpriced lattes, safely insulated from any actual confrontation with reality. It’s not just that they don’t act—it’s that they no longer believe action is necessary. They believe feeling the correct emotions is sufficient.
And when the weight of their own contradictions becomes too much, they retreat. The minute the consequences of their own inaction and cowardice become unavoidable, they flee to their sanctuaries—Barbados, the Cotswolds, a summer home in Mexico City. They are forever “exhausted,” forever in need of a “break” from the political struggle they never actually engaged in. In this, they have managed to make even apathy into a self-congratulatory performance. It is not that they are ignorant; it is that they deliberately choose to remain ignorant because to face the truth would require something of them. The idea of real resistance terrifies them. They have no stomach for it.
Even in the face of war crimes, genocide, and imperial slaughter—atrocities they once would have at least pretended to oppose—they remain silent. Where were they as Biden and his administration dragged America into yet another bloodbath? Where were all the grand pronouncements about “saving democracy” when their chosen leader stood behind ethnic cleansing, coups, and mass death? The truth is, they were exactly where they always are—nowhere. Their supposed moral outrage is purely selective, purely conditional. They remain locked in their own ideological bubbles, unwilling to recognize that they have become the very thing they once claimed to despise.
American liberalism is dead—not in the sense that it was defeated, but in the sense that it willingly euthanized itself. It has become infantilized, incapable of action, paralyzed by a mixture of arrogance and fear. The modern liberal does not fight for justice; they fight for their own comfort. And so, they will continue to retreat, to whine, to consume, to rationalize their own cowardice—until, one day, they wake up to find that there is nothing left to retreat from.
Liberals are actually cultural revolutionaries. Liberalism is a middle class intellectualist reaction against working class leftism. It appears the ‘right’ is their enemy, but it’s actually traditional working class ideals they reject.
Larry Romanoff wrote:
https://www.unz.com/lromanoff/democracy-the-most-dangerous-religion-part-1-introduction/
In antebellum America, before public education and mass media, the people were capable of thinking for themselves. The modern American population must be viewed with extreme cynicism — they have been indoctrinated from birth.
How was George III an Absolutist monarch?
lol.
Already did. The Swamp/Obama dictatorship was one big offensive, right down to attacking citizens assembled to support a Presidential candidate. That was a violation of the First Amendment, right to assemble to prevent grievances. Swamp/Obama then tracked down all it could who had been in the assembled crowd, and applied lawfare to arrest, imprison (some only briefly), and in many cases torture these people. It then attempted the same tactics against the Presidential candidate himself. Nonetheless, this offensive reached “culmination”, final climactic stage or exhaustion, during the Biden campaign.
Offensives always eventually exhaust themselves because the armed forces/social institutions become ineffective. In a military context, the forces in contact become combat ineffective thanks to casualties, and and their logistics support fails , or perhaps the offensive has reached its objectives [1]. In a civil context, a political offensive is no longer effective [2] because the general public either rejects policies as injurious (e.g. ~20% increase in food prices) or else stops listening to the propaganda (because Kamila is an “airhead” or perhaps they tried following the propaganda and were hurt as a result). Supposedly Bernays, pioneer of PR, said: “I can sell everybody in the US a case of tuberculosis, but only once”.
FWIW, Trump’s offensive will eventually reach culmination. By that time Trump had better have established a workable system for rule of the US or he will fail — the US will break up, go bankrupt, or likely both.
Right now, Trump seems to be going for cutting loose what the US can’t afford to keep, domestically so far. IMHO he is abandoning the US Empire while he still has the forces and money for an orderly abandonment. He is also abandoning the Imperial aspects of US government, aspects that are intended to reduce US citizens to the status of any other Imperial subject. Note that Obama not only appointed himself US dictator, but also the effective Emperor of the US Empire — hence EU is trying to end racism by being highly racist, which is an Obama era policy. Obama also made his successors Emperors, just as a residual effect.
There is an historical parallel here. Right after Augustus, first Emperor, the form of the Roman Republic was retained, and many of that generation hoped to restore the Roman Republic. The Empire promulgated a myth that the Emperor was really on the the “first man in Rome”, the primary man, the head of the Principate. The myth was kept up for over 200 years, until the “Dominate” phase [3] (from “dominus” in Latin, meaning master or owner). In that context, Obama established himself as “Princeps”, a dictator serving by election or acclamation, in his “pen and phone” speech, Pres. Biden acted like a Princeps (a mad Princeps perhaps but Rome had plenty of those) and Trump is also Princeps, whether he likes it or not, hence his rule by Executive Order.
******************************************************
1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Culminating_point
2] The Kamila Harris campaign spent a bit over a billion US Dollars on the 2024 elections, to no apparent effect on intended body of voters.
3] Diocletian is the historical marker. Essentially, the appointment of members of the Senate to command military forces had lost so many battles that professional military men took over as Emperor. Didn’t work out long term, too many local military commanders tried for Emperor by revolting either on their own initiative or at the initiative of their troops.
Liberals still have tenure in most departments which means they are still paid 6 figures to fill the White students with guilt and self-loathing. The most anti-White departments are no different than they were a year ago and if anything the professors are more likely to take out their resentment on the White male students.
Liberals also still make most television shows and movies. Prime time shows still have themes around evil White men ruining the world and holding down Blacks even where they are in charge of their own governments.
Which means they still have the biggest microphone from which they spew their anti-White bile while to millions while our genius conservatives focus on important things like tax cuts for the wealthy and funding Israel. Oh and Fox had a special report on drag queen story hour so call the conservative clown police on that.
Disclosure: I hate both liberals and conservatives and view the latter as enablers of clown town.
Too long.
Liberalism is mostly bitter White women wanting to use the government to fix the unfortunate reality of racial differences through any means necessary. There are men involved but they have been mostly sidelined by these women as sexually undesirable lackeys. The hierarchies are led by women.
That’s the primary motive.
Millions of White women that correctly sense that race is real and want the government to crack down on Bad Whites and especially White men that might talk about it.
It’s a preference for egalitarian control over Western objectivity for the sake of equality and stability.
It doesn’t work and causes all kinds of unforeseen consequences that are kept from polite society.
I’ve seen White people in multi-racial areas nearly have breakdowns over what they have witnessed and what they are supposed to pretend exists. These lies destroy good people that are trying to help. The real mr. holland’s opus is a heavy drinker and hates us all.
Liberals are in a quandary over the death of DEI. DEI was the mechanism by which they intended to have the government help or hinder identity groups while ignoring individual rights and the constitution. The justification for this was that historical wrongs had been committed and, to set things right, the government had to compel the descendants of the perpetrators to make amends to the descendants of the victims, democracy be damned. The same ideology applied to foreign policy meant that the government could make arbitrary decisions, such as supporting Apartheid Israel to make up for the Holocaust, without concerning themselves with pesky things like universal human rights, self-determination, and national sovereignty. Russia and China were impediments to this vision, so they had to dominated and neutered. In 2025, it’s apparent even to the Liberals that their dream of the last 12 odd years is at an end. That said, it will likely take a decade or more for them to reorient themselves and realize that equity and equality are antithetical concepts, attempting to dominate Russia and China is a losing proposition, and you can’t advocate for human rights without condemning Israel. Basically, they need to figure out which principles they stand for, rather than just fostering grievance groups in exchange for votes.
You’re so close but don’t quite grasp it. Term limits, really? Lol
Sheep massively outnumber the wolves. There’s no such thing as a lone sheep.
pepe escobar is trash
I assure you that I am enjoying the hell out of this punishment. I can imagen that the level of the simmering anger inside of them is building to an explosion.
Few of those you list could be described as naive.
It is all circumstantial, but Patton expressed his own opinions very clearly in letters, essentially ‘we supported the wrong side’, the Jewish D.P.s are disgusting (my paraphrase of his many comments to that effect), his fatal ‘accident’ certainly doesn’t appear to have been accidental at all.
Video Link
Donald Trump exposed himself to be the totally corrupt, evil liar, a showman that he is by first promising hell to Hamas if theres not a treaty when he starts his 2. term and then right after he started his 2. term, he started to do exactly what murderous zionists always wanted: To push palestinian off their lands to go “elsewhere”, so that jews and only jews can get all the palestinian lands.
Then secondly, do you see what he did right after he started his 2. term? He hit Somalia, because now “ISIS”, created by the CIA, MI6 and Mossad was now hiding in Somalia and was posing a “threat” to american. Somalia is one of the last countries on the US general Wesley Clarks 7 countries in 5 years zionist war plan list. So naturally Trump will now focus to destroy and subjugate Somalia, Sudan and Iran with any means necessary.
The Author has overlooked a lot. 1st Amendment Trump wants to punish college protestors for protesting GENOCIDE. His handlers, Miriam Addelson ($100 Mil), ADL, AIPAC are claiming Antisemitism when it’s cold blooded Murder.
Biden stopped Israeli Spyware “Pegasus” being used by FBI. Trump now has allowed this spyware to be used by Gov’t and private industry. This is a NO Click spyware which allows users access whether you clicked on something or not.
We’re at that stage where it doesn’t matter who in the Uniparty is in charge the Empire is collapsing. I voted Trump because he chose Patel, RFK jr and Tulsi. Unfortunately it’s too little too late.
Whether Trump has good intentions by introducing a Stable Coin it will be corrupted into a CBDC.
So the question is Trump riding on top of the Trojan Horse or inside?
ISIS has outlived their usefulness to Israel.
The Guardian has a new feminazi cunt today, reporting on the mysterious upsurge in ‘antisemitism’ in Austfailia. There is no such thing, just the local Jewintern and the vermin of our MSM and politics pretending that opposition to the Gaza Holocaust is ‘Jew-hate’.
Most of the ‘atrocities’, stupid graffiti, throwing a little paint on the former house of a local Jewintern apologist for the Gaza genocide, a fire in a synagogue, where the precious Torah Scrolls were, miraculously, left intact, etc, are clearly false flags. Needless too say, the odious cunt did NOT mention ‘Gaza’, ‘Palestinians’, ‘Gaza Holocaust’ or ‘Gaza genocide’ once in her verminous sludge.
Diversity is a fine goal-monocultures atrophy through in-breeding. Equity, likewise is commonsense if you believe in human egalitarianism. Inclusion, similarly, beats exclusion every day.
Unfortunately these fine ideals were ruined by fanatics determined to use them vengefully against others, the ‘liberal democratic’ ideal. The Trumpenstein monster is engaging in similar retribution now. The US system has produced a society riven by partisan hatreds, and searching for an external enemy to take the plebs minds of their internecine warfare and crumbling life prospects.
Trump is Caligula, Musk his Incitatus. Washington was your Augustus, Clinton, Tiberius, Bush II possibly Sejanus, and Hillary, obviously, is Livia, reborn.
Anti (without any Fa), the main thing is anti (against everything). As with early childhood defiant behavior. These “individuals”, too, are, in fact, permanently pubescent late developers, whereby it is not clear whether any development of maturity ever occurs before physical death.
Since there have been no fascists for 80 years, they have to be artificially created in order to guarantee the Antifa a right to exist. There was once a funny contribution that revolved around Antifa, where “Fa” referred to a german cosmetics brand for body care. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fa_(brand)
Bolshevism, however focused on its own objectives, was riding a gargantuan wave of popular political upheaval. The critical theorists are just spinning their wheels, as the populace yawns. True leftism implies profound socio-economic restructuring and is only valid with sweeping popular approval. Identity politics creates divisions in the populace, which is why it’s tolerated, even promoted by the ruling classes. And as we see, because of the “culture wars,” there is no unity among the vast numbers of American working people who nevertheless share common needs and existential interests. By referring the question of existence to deterministic causes–race, gender, etc.–identity politics is profoundly reactionary. (Nazism and Zionism being the most extreme forms of identity politics the world has known.)