RSS
Destroys justification for college affirmative action.
Thumbnail credit: © Ziyu Julian Zhu/Xinhua via ZUMA Press
This video is available on Rumble, BitChute, and Odysee.
The Supreme Court’s decision on affirmative action and the reactions to it are the latest proof — as if any were needed — that politics in multiracial America are fractured beyond repair.
The best thing the decision did was demolish the idea that “diversity” on campus is so important that it justifies racial discrimination. As for the reactions, hysterical liberals — that is to say, Democrats and most of the media — genuinely seem to believe that the decision is a great victory for — guess what? — white supremacy.
First, let’s look at the racial discrimination in Harvard’s admissions policies, which was a big part of the case. Litigation often compels parties to cough up information they don’t want anyone to see.
Columnist and podcaster John Derbyshire has rightly called attention to this expert report. The author, Peter Arcidiacono, is an economics professor at Duke, and used admissions data Harvard was forced to turn over. This table calculates what a Harvard class would have looked like if admissions had been based strictly on grades and test scores, or what Harvard called its “academic index.” If Harvard had randomly accepted whites, black, Hispanics and Asians from the “top decile,” or top 10 percent on the academic index, shown on the bottom line, the admitted class would have been 36.54 percent white, 0.76 percent black, 2.69 percent Hispanic, and 51.52 percent Asian. That would mean completely disregarded race. As you work up from the bottom line, you can see class composition if Harvard had ignored race but selected from the top 20 or 30 percent, etc.. What was the actual racial mix of admitted students?
That’s the blue line. Whites were 37.61 percent of the class — very close to the 36.54 percent that would have got in on merit. Blacks were 15.81 percent, or 22-1/2 times the number that would have been admitted on merit. Hispanics were 14.9 percent, or 5-1/2 times, and Asians were 24.86, or just under half the number that would have been admitted on pure academic index. Asians clearly paid the price so Harvard could let in so many blacks and Hispanics.
Let us hear no more guff about “affirmative action” being a benevolent exercise in “equal opportunity” that hurts no one. Harvard was rigorously discriminating against Asians so as to admit favored minorities.
This was what Chief Justice John Roberts was talking about when he wrote that “Eliminating racial discrimination means eliminating all of it,” and that the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment forbids discrimination.
Mr. Roberts completely repudiated the “diversity” justification for discrimination. The theory had always been that having blacks and Hispanics on campus is a “compelling interest” because their mere presence vastly improves a college education for everyone. The history of that silly argument, which dates back to the famous 1978 Bakke decision — which rejected preferences as compensation for past racial harm, by the way — is laid out in this Reason article, “Say Farewell To The ‘Diversity Benefits’ Rationale For Affirmative Action.”
Justice Roberts wrote that the benefits of diversity are pure assertions, entirely unproven, impossible to quantify, and can’t be evaluated by judges. In other words, baloney. For 45 years, judges have blindly accepted the hot-air claims universities made for diversity, and the Roberts court refuses to go along.
Oddly, no one is asking the obvious question: If the benefits of campus diversity are baloney, what about diversity elsewhere? I have been arguing for 30 years that racial diversity is a terrible source of conflict and tension.
Is the court edging my way?
In their dissents, in which they tried to defend race preferences, Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Jackson didn’t even try to rehabilitate “diversity,” it’s so phony.
Instead, they roared about the horrors of past discrimination. As this article notes, “the dissenters adopted the en vogue theory that our society is plagued by structural racism and the Fourteenth Amendment must be interpreted to remedy that oppression.”
They have swallowed Critical Race Theory, and are hanging their hats on a justification of discrimination — compensation for past harm — that the court rejected 45 years ago in Bakke. This is full-blown, Kamala-Harris style “equity,” which insists that every black-white difference must be blamed on awful white people, and must be set right by special treatment.
Justice Jackson’s dissent was especially shrill.
She lovingly trotting out slavery, Jim Crow, lynching, and statistics on race differences in outcome that she blamed on white people. Rich Lowry in National Review correctly wrote that “Her handiwork hardly qualifies as a legal opinion. It reads like a guest essay by ‘anti-racist’ guru Ibram X. Kendi.”
That is no doubt why Kamala Harris called it “one of the most brilliant dissents that any justice of the United States Supreme Court has ever written.”
I’m sure the vice president has read every dissent, since the first one was written in 1790.
In her enthusiasm, Justice Jackson wrote that affirmative action literally “saves lives:” “For high-risk Black newborns, having a Black physician more than doubles the likelihood that the baby will live, and not die.”
I knew that was wrong as soon as I read it, and was about to dig through Ms. Jackson’s footnotes but the Wall Street Journal saved me the trouble. “Justice Jackson’s Incredible Statistic” explains why her claim is not only untrue but absurd. *** For the most part, big media has knelt at her feet, as in “Ketanji Brown Jackson Exposed the Supreme Court’s ‘Colorblind’ Lie.” This is one of many articles that breathlessly repeated the claim about dying black babies. ***
The sky, we are told, will surely fall. “The Supreme Court Just Bulldozed Affirmative Action,” says Slate, adding that “the decision is a massive blow to racial justice, one with noxious consequences throughout society that we will feel for the rest of our lives.”
MSNBC contributor Dean Obeidallah tweeted: “Next up the GOP’s Supreme “Court” will strike down the Civil Rights Act to allow Jim Crow segregation to start again.”
Note the scare quotes around “court.”
Someone named Aziz Huq, who teaches at University of Chicago Law School, wrote that “Ending Affirmative Action May Be Just the Beginning,” predicting that “race-blindness by the Supreme Court will make it easier for other people to discriminate.”
Treating people — especially Asians — equally is white supremacy.
When they weren’t blasting the Court, liberals flayed Asians for breaking ranks with the anti-white coalition.
Fox collected examples in “Media, liberals attack Asian Americans as pawns.”
Soledad O’Brien told an Asian who supported the ruling, “Congrats on screwing over other people of color.”
Jemele Hill of the Atlantic wrote to the same Asian: “Can’t wait until [your daughter] reads that you gladly carried the water for White supremacy.”
NPR quoted Asians in “Affirmative action divided Asian Americans and other people of color.”
Jeff Chang said “Asians serve as this sort of mask for white privilege. A mask that white privilege can wear in order to hide itself.” Sally Chen said the Supreme Court’s decision says: “Hey, Asian Americans, you too can see Black and brown people demanding equity and inclusion as a threat to you. Cast your fate with white opponents of integration.”
Needless to say, “Biden Says Supreme Court Can’t Have ‘Last Word’ on Affirmative Action.”
The President says the Court is trying to change what America stands for: “giving everyone a fair shot.” Blacks and Hispanics get a “fair shot” only when everyone else doesn’t.
Mr. Biden has already commissioned a study on “promising admissions practices to build inclusive, diverse student bodies.”
That is, how to subvert the ruling.
The Roberts decision has two kinks. First, in application essays, students can write about the importance of their racial identities and how they fought racism, but this must be something unique to each applicant, and must not be a way to smuggle affirmative action in through the back door. I don’t think writing about race will work for white applicants.
Also, Mr. Roberts exempted military academies from his ruling. They can go on blatantly discriminating because national security requires a diverse officer corps. How does this square with his insistence that diversity is baloney, and that the 14th Amendment forbids racial discrimination?
So, what happens now? I predict a brief dip in black and Hispanic admissions, before fancy schools go back to their old ways. Every favored-race applicant will turn out to have written a brilliant essay about his life-long fight against white supremacy. More schools will dump standardized testing, so there will no longer be an objective way to measure discrimination. Admissions offices will put nothing on paper and destroy all records of admission decisions. And, of course, the truth about race differences in IQ will be censored as ruthlessly as ever.
The libido for so-called “equity” is too strong to be thwarted by a mere court decision. One thing is certain. We won’t get Little Rock, 1957.
The 101st Airborne will never fix bayonets and force aside deans of diversity so that blatant victims of discrimination can attend Harvard or UC Berkeley.
English
Arabic
Chinese (Simplified)
Dutch
French
German
Hebrew
Hindi
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Russian
Spanish
Swedish
Turkish
Vietnamese
The solution to the SCOTUS decision is simple :
i) Make one of the Ivy League Universities all black (so one-eighth, approximately matching the population percentage), and change its status to an HBCU.
ii) That University should be the least rigorous of the eight*. You just have to change its name from ‘Brown’ to ‘Black’.
ii) Call it the ‘Jivey League’.
Done. Black University in Rhode Island is now the Jivey League, the best HBCU in America. WN wiggers hardest hit.
*There was some discussion of turning Cornell University into Cornrow University or just deleting one ‘l’ to make it ‘Cornel’ in honor of the great Cornel West. It even has a ‘Cornell West Campus’ :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cornell_West_Campus
But the heavy presence of rigorous disciplines over there like Engineering, and Grad Schools like Business, Law, and Medicine made it a poor candidate for HBCU status. The frigid weather didn’t help either.
Video Link
This court seems to have a mandate to manufacture issues for Democrats to campaign on. Now it’s the Christian Nationalist court. It’s also the Corporate Junket court. It ran into the abortion debate, doused the curtains with gasoline and threw a match in at a point where the Democrats should have been reeling and on the ropes. Nothing happens by accident.
Somehow, Jared Taylor is well paid and never names Jew bankers behind the anti-white racket.
Hmmmm…..
What seems to missing from the analysis is weighted proportion as in what are the weighted proportions of the population that constitute each separate racial category?
More specifically, does Harvard prioritize U.S. citizenship in its solicitation or selection of applicants? If so, then white Americans are vastly underrepresented in each category of “objective testing/achievement” AND Asians are vastly overrepresented against their miniscule proportion of the U.S. population no matter their test scores. However, if Chinese immigrant/legal aliens are not excluded then China’s 4x population easily drives the Asian-equation notwithstanding China’s average IQ being 5 to 8 points above the U.S. which in turn drives the Asian-equation even higher
SCROTUS are commandeered by the Catholic and Jewish Camps.
IIRC, there haven’t been a Protestant (50% of Pop) or a Secular/Non-Western (~24% of Pop) at the Supremes for awhile.
Just keep that in mind…
Whites were 37.61 percent of the class — very close to the 36.54 percent that would have got in on merit.
More schools will dump standardized testing, so there will no longer be an objective way to measure discrimination.
jared is confusing test scores and grades with test scores alone. the latter is merit. the former is not.
everyone knows:
1. chinapipo are pushy obedient strivers. flynn documented this. they “perform” academically 20 points above their IQs. they have no idea what “trying too hard” means. no gentleman’s C for them.
2. chinapipo americans‘ VIQ is lower than that of wypipo’s despite being a select population.
3. south asian americans are smarter than chinapipo americans.
if the US admitted based on test scores only…as almost the entire rest of the world does…and if those tests weren’t dumbed-down as they have been in the US…
merit = chinapipo and boxwallahs no more than 35%. wypipo 64%. jews 5%, NAMs 0%
I am a little suspicious of Asians being smarter than Whites.
Pozzed sjw whorenalist react proves SC right.
Who does America need more? Asian STEM talent or Black liberal arts majors? Which group would make our companies more competitive?
If all Asians in America went back to Asia, there would be one hell of a void that we couldn’t fill in skilled professions. There would be many less patents filed.
>Infuriates Liberals
Taylor is boomer posting at this point — next he’ll be telling everyone that ‘Democrats are the real racists’.
The sole logical basis for the ‘merit’ argument is that scores on standard tests are the best predictor of success in higher education — better than GPA and subjective factors like teacher recommendations — while this is rarely questioned, the data on that, at least for some less selective schools, is somewhat mixed:
Unsurprisingly, students with scores below a certain threshold do poorly; they really do not belong in college — but for better students with both good grades and reasonably high test scores, the average difference in outcomes between students with higher test scores vs students with marginally lower test scores was small, at least at UCR — a big, national study on this question, using data from a large number and a wide variety of schools, would be interesting.
Looking at the quality of civilizations they build, clearly the test score gap between Whites and Asians has no significance whatsoever — in fact, judging by migrant flows, Asians seem to prefer white civilization.
And it is never really explained why failure to admit on test scores alone is seen as de facto unlawful discrimination — obviously, there is nothing in the Constitution about university admissions and test scores.
Basically the lawsuits were pushed by Asian parents angry their kids were denied the cachet of an Ivy League degree — they could go somewhere else and get a comparable undergrad education.
I don’t blame anyone at Harvard for not wanting a typical class to be majority Asian — after all, this is America, not Asia.
Like the Roe vs Wade thing, it seems to be come less from genuine ideals and more in order to rile up Democrats and thus justify the next voting fraud. Then the policies will be reversed. But we will see.
Meritocratic Lives Matter.
Systemic Stupidity and the Clueless Clown Show of Cultural Marxism.
Video Link
It should be obvious now that there is no possibility of any kind of outcome except separation or civil war. I would prefer mass expulsions of Democrats and disloyal minorities, but whatever. These nutjobs will fight to the death to retain their unearned “benefits” and free stuff. White America can’t afford to allow this nonsense to go on. There is no middle ground.
Just look at “Justice” Katenji Jackson (the silly, made-up name tells you all you need to know).
It is all the rage to urinate on anything remotely “Confederate” these days. If the men who fought in the Union army could see what has happened to the country they fought for, they would join with the rebels and clean this country from top to bottom. “Justice” Jackson would be cleaning toilets for a living, if they were in a merciful mood.
Those who flirt with racism in the West forget that the first task of Nazi Germany was a racial cleansing throughout occupied Europe and that although they managed to eliminate almost the entire non-white European population in the end they were shamefully defeated by the Slavs and Asians who were superior soldiers.
Don’t forget that’s the reality, Hollywood is film nonsense.
Maybe his jewish wife will cut him off?
Jared is JQ’d. He says some Jews are ‘Men of the West’, but that Jewish intellectuals undermine white identity everywhere they go. The first ten minutes, here:
https://odysee.com/@PoliticallyProvoked:6/Jared-Taylor-Interview:a
Juicy part: http://murdoch-murdoch.net/videos/JQ/jared-taylor-is-jqd-1683845300385834.webm
Don’t know if that retard Jackson is smart enough to clean toilets. Pick cotton, maybe.
It’s the Protestant-dominated “supreme court” that gave us many flawed “opinions”, one of the most destructive being “Wickard v. Filburn” which expanded the federal government’s “reach” into intrastate commerce, declaring that a product from one state could be affecting commerce in another state despite not being created or sold in interstate commerce, nevertheless being subject to federal government regulation and control.
Another Protestant-led “supreme court” “opinion” was “Brown v. Board of Education” which was flawed as the court based its “opinion” on the tendency of black children to choose white toy dolls rather than black toy dolls, thereby “proving” that racial “discrimination” existed and had to be abolished. In this “opinion” it was deemed that blacks had to sit next to whites for them to learn.
It is the Catholic members of today’s “supreme court” who are finally “righting the ship” by abolishing “affirmative action” and restoring true “freedom of religion”.
Protestants have a lot to answer for with their flawed “supreme court” “opinions”.
It would have been nice, unexpected but nice, if someone had asked how Jewish people who have been downtrodden and ground down so low as to deserve special protections are also just lumped in with white people. Ron Unz already told us the numbers and they show ruthless discrimination against Christian whites and special treatment of people who write about the grandparents who died at Auschwitz.
Does the ruling even apply to Jews?
‘Democrats … believe that the decision is a great victory for white supremacy.’ — Jared Taylor
Jared Taylor carelessly cites the loaded code word ‘white supremacy,’ while shirking his authorial duty to deconstruct it. So I will.
White supremacy is a meme pushed by culture-war Jews such as attorney general Merrick Beria ‘Garland’ [not his real name] and DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas.
Their ‘white supremacy’ meme asserts that it is perfectly acceptable for minorities such as blacks, hispanics and (super omnia) jews to vigorously advocate for their ethnic interests … whereas, the slightest peep of complaint from non-jewish whites is sinister, racist and threatening.
In his perceptive essay “Affirmative Action and the Jewish Elephant in the Room,” Ron Unz ripped the Band-Aid off the seemingly anodyne ‘white’ category:
Jared Taylor almost surely read Unz’s analysis, yet declines to ‘go there’ by pointing out the scrums of smirking jews preening in the ‘white’ woodpile.
If Jared Taylor can’t detect and proclaim that the ‘white’ category has been weaponized to discriminate against non-jewish whites — even as they are pummeled by government ministers with the odious slander of white supremacy — then young Jared’s going to get cucked again.
One assumes that Taylor’s ‘see no jews’ myopia is not a deliberate limited hangout, to maintain his viability within the jewish media. Or is it?
“Blacks were 15.81 percent, or 22-1/2 times the number that would have been admitted on merit”
Harvard better watch because if the blacks get mad enough they just might burn Harvard down or cause serious damage.
Controlled opposition for the Jew establishment.
That chart can’t even remotely be correct. BTW, it’s missing another population segment altogether. Pretty nifty how (((they))) managed that.
Brilliantly written article as usual. The only fly in the ointment I see is here:
According to Ron Unz, Jews at 25% of the student body are lumped into this “white” category. Which means that White Christians are only about 10% of Harvard’s student body and thus underrepresented almost fourfold. What do you say?
Your prediction seems entirely plausible. Probably the only reasonable outcome is for white Christians to establish their own institutions of higher learning. Maybe go back to faith-based universities. What is the demographic composition of Liberty University in Virginia? Or BYU in Utah? Perhaps you can look into that and write another stellar essay!
Taylor speaks Japanese. I think his wife is Asian.
Exactly. The recent outrageous displays of corruption by Thomas and Alito, accepting luxury vacations from rich businessmen with cases pending before the court, and Scalia earlier, would never have occurred with Protestant justices.
Many of them are like little computers for math. They are not creative however which is why they steal technology or just improve upon the things Whites invent. If we had not destroyed our schools integrating low IQ blacks into them we would not need Asians to fill higher level jobs. White males, who used to excel in STEM have now been marginalized and pushed downward by things like affirmative action and favoritism toward women. That is why we now have more women than men graduating from college. Such is what happens when you allow organized jewry to take over your establishments.
Yes, ability and determination are everything.
The reality has finally set in. Leftist shittyworld cannot tolerate or exist with a meritocracy.
“That is no doubt why Kamala Harris called it “one of the most brilliant dissents that any justice of the United States Supreme Court has ever written.””
It’s a case of dumb and dumber between the VP and the Justice … two black broads jiving like scullery maids, which is what they would be in the Whitehouse and at the Supreme Court respectively had it not been for the affirmative action.
What about a column for the Jews Jarred.
That would be cool. Burn baby, burn.
How about jews?
When it is convenient to jews, they classified themselves as white.
When is is convenient to jews, they classified themselves as jews.
When is this discriminatory arrangement going to be addressed?
I’m Asian with 2 kids in college and I actually think SCOTUS is going about this all wrong. Instead of banning race as a factor for admission we should use race and academic credential as the only factors: admit in direct proportion to each group’s share of the general population, and take only the top applicants in each group based strictly on a combination of SAT scores+GPA+AP test scores.
This would get rid of the hazy and opaque “Holistic Admissions” which still allows for far too much manipulation in favor of legacy status, victimhood status which includes race, athletics, meaningless involvement in science/math/essay competitions or other dubious “talents” like activism through volunteerism, which is exhausting our top students leaving them no time for creativity or pursuing things that truly interest them.
Under this new scheme whites would make up 60% of elite schools’ student body, Jews 2%, Asians 6%, multi-racial 4%, blacks 12% and Hispanics 16%. The top students in each group would get in instead of who is most well connected or can whine the most in their essays. I think that is the fairest method for a multiracial country like the US.
Do you think that the Protestants were to “Blame” for “Past Court Misgivings”? This Country was formulated mostly by WASProtestant, Deist, Secularist Landed Gentry with Masonic-Zionists in Charge
What makes you think that Catholics and Jewish-Diaspora would have made “Different and Better” Choices in Court back then and make better decisions now?
How so?
Here’s another one – WhyTF can’t we “successfully” Prosecute/Incarcerate/Litigate against Catholic Clergy relative to the sheer number of their alleged+admitted Child Molestation Cases?
Do Church “Penance and Absolution” really work in a Secular Nation, or suppress the Secular Rule of Law?
Your Bias is Obvious.
This Country had roughly less than 10 Percent (5%?) or so of Catholics at the Declaration. Though the Catholic Percentage of the Demographics will increase somewhat with OpenBorders – I believe the SCROTUS should represent more of a Cross Section of the Republic BodyPolitic.
Loosely based on Demographics, Catholics shouldn’t take more than 3 Seats, Jewish not more than 1.
I’d like that far more than seeing the “Overrepresentation” of two Distinct Ethno-Religious Minorities seated at the Supremes.
Are you in the Camp that would say that Murica are better off with the Jewish-Diaspora running most (presumably Top Rated) Ivy League Schools and commandeering 20% of the School’s Undergraduate Student Seats – while holding 3~4% of the Population? With plenty more Whites and East Asians scoring as much+higher on Entrance Exams?
Murica’s Oligarchs have Plundered the Internal Political+Social Landscape over the years; but I prefer the intended “Federal Republic” duly respected in running Top Level Federal Institutions.
You must be living in some imaginary very white version of the USA, perhaps with a time machine.
Predicting that the 100 million Non-Asian “minorities” in the USA would attain zero elite university spots under a merit system, is obviously absurd. Do you even know any of the tens of millions of middle-class or upper-income Hispanic US citizens? How about the many competent and reasonably intelligent Middle Eastern and Persian people in the US?
A merit selection system likely would lead to fewer than half the elite university spots being given to nonHispanic nonJewish White European-Americans. Jews and most of all Africans would lose their overrepresentation privilege, but nonhispanic whites still wouldn’t be a majority at the most selective competitive universities.
Also, white nonHispanic people are already a minority in most of our most populous States — including #1 California, #3 Florida, #4 New York, and #11 New Jersey.
NonHispanic whites also constitute a minority of the youth population of many other States, like #2 Texas, Maryland, Colorado, and Arizona. The word minority cannot be used to describe non-whites in the USA any longer. We should say what we actually mean.
The real intelligence and talent lies disproportionately in the emerging Eurasian master race. Got that hybrid vigor, yo.
Here’s what AUTHENTIC “White Supremacy” really looks like…to me – those “soldiers” with their bayonets fixed and pointed at those young White people – in a new regime of White Supremacy they would be identified, tracked down, arrested…AND SUMMARILY EXECUTED for a level of race treason beyond outrage. And then the REAL process of rounding up all our explicit and devoted anti-White enemies would go into full and fervent swing. The policy of a long-LONG-in-coming revenge/retribution ACTION would do its cleansing work. THAT’S what REAL White Supremacy would look like in my world. Only the term WS is not accurate here even as it is just a filthy swear word in the mouths of our enemies. It IN TRUTH would be a cosmic JUSTICE meted out after GENERATIONS of race-war perpetrated against Whites in their own lands and countries. A massive perfidy of the Other rewarding Good with Evil and the Elites who empowered and sustained them. This is not any kind of “Supremacy” but an utterly JUST response for a near 80 years of War upon White Americans and a final, massive “Return-of Fire” upon our mortal enemies.
Yes, and the majority of young people in America, meaning the USA, are nonwhite, most of all Hispanic.
Jared, another great, informative article. But don’t get too giddy about the SCOTUS decision…this country is in the crapper on so many levels and for many reasons.
Rubbish!
Where are you getting the data for point 3? I’ve never seen a single study that showed South Asians to have higher IQs than East Asians–unless you mean just the Brahmin caste, and no other caste, of India.
“Your prediction seems entirely plausible. Probably the only reasonable outcome is for white Christians to establish their own institutions of higher learning.”
They already did: they’re called “Pretty much every major university in America.” Every one of them built and funded by whites. But then the Jews stole them all right out from under whites, locked the doors against them, and invited in all manner of blacks and foreign mystery meat to crowd them out, using all kinds of bogus excuses to do same. Just as the quota/J-restrictionists of the 1920s predicted they would, if given a beach-head.
If whites started all over again, and built “their own” universities all over again, the Jews would just steal them all over again. It never stops.
“Bob, for $500, what is the top 7 decides for getting the most whites admitted in?”
… (too much jeopardy?)
The fairest way to solve the problem would be for there to be three parellel routes for admission.
33 1/3 % of places would be up for auction, and the parents who offered to pay the highest tuition would win places for their offspring.
33 1/3 % of places would be assigned by a lottery. Any high school graduate could enter, but each candidate could only buy 1 ticket, for a modest price of, say, $25.
33 1/3 of places would be awarded based on a competitive examination held annually at Harvard. The format of the exam would change each year, so that no one could prepare for it, and the aim would be to favor candidates capable of thinking on their feet.
This would provide for wealth, intelligence, and randomness.
This ruling can be seen as a little victory for common sense. It’s akin to plugging one little hole in a sinking ship. The idea being get off the ship, find a life boat or some flotsam that like minded people are holding onto and start networking.
This court…ran into the abortion debate
Purest hoeseshit. It did precisely the opposite: It ran out of the abortion debate, recognizing that there was was no constitutional justification for it’s meddling, and that was the correct thing to do.
so six million was not enough for you?
everyone knows what happens when white people are allowed to have their own institutions and nations
genocide happens
Never Again, means Never Again!
Never again can white people be allowed to pursue their own ethnic destiny, because they would sail to the stars, and make non-whites feel bad about themselves!
Is that what you want?!
look what happened when Germany pulled out the zio-fangs from its national jugular, and rose to be the most powerful nation the world had ever seen, in just a few short years of following their own racial interests. Look what happened to Russian when a Russian nationalist pulled the zio-fangs out of the Russian people. That can NEVER! be allowed to happen again.
the only solution to white people, is genocide
even if slow, grueling genocide by racial subjugation and doing away with whiteness though blending
I agree.
We didn’t NEED THEM IN THE PAST – obviously! We don’t need them now. Here’s how moronic you are – WE ARE APPROACHING MINORITY STATUS in less than a quarter century. We are an oppressed people IN OUR OWN COUNTRIES – at the very moment. Murder and mayhem almost certainly await us if the bulk of Whites remain as emasculated as you. Did you not get the memo? So…from your lounge chair, whom are you cheering for – the Chinese or the sc Indians? Which one will clean out the low IQ violent hordes left…the quickest? Enjoy the contest. If you’re non-White. If White…good luck. You’ll need it.
I can and will answer your questions civilly:
You have answered your first question. The “landed gentry” were indeed Protestants. Catholics were marginalized in many states as Protestantism was considered a “official state religion” in many areas. Yes, persecution of Catholics was relatively common in pre-USA and early post-USA days, Maryland being established as a “Catholic” state.
According to Catholic doctrine, employers are REQUIRED to pay at least subsistence wages. The Protestant “robber barons” always found excuses to pay their employees as little as possible while amassing great fortunes and living grand lives themselves. This ties in with the Protestant belief that “good works” are of no value. In fact, it is Catholics who established the first universities, hospitals, and parochial schools, which at first were seen as “subversive”. This also ties in to the “prosperity gospel” which is another Protestant trait which considers anyone who fails in business to have a moral failing as well.
You bias is showing when it comes to the “Catholic clergy sex abuse scandal”. Yes, the problem is despicable but has been dealt with effectively in the last decades.
There are many more instances of Protestant lay leaders and jewish rabbis committing despicable acts against children but they are almost never publicized. It is jewish hatred of Roman Catholicism as well as their control of the mainstream media which gives them a forum in which to show their hatred of and denigrate Catholicism.
Keep in mind that it is Protestantism that has been “judified” (jewified) with the adoption of jewish principles, especially in business dealings, usury and the like.
The jewish takeover of the Roman Catholic Church only occurred with the “coup” with the creation of the Vatican II Ecumenical Council.
You are lumping Catholicism and judaism together when it is actually Protestantism that has a closer affinity with judaism and jews and some of their practices.
Your claim that the demographics should take into consideration the number of seats that Catholics should hold on the supreme court flies in the face of “separation of church and state”. Protestants have been imposing their “values” on the court along with their affinity for judaic “values”. THAT is a problem that I have pointed out in my previous post.
I, like you am extremely dissatisfied observing the stranglehold that jews have on our “institutions of higher learning” as well as the media and in government as well. Catholics have an extremely small margin in the aforementioned educational, media and government. Please keep in mind that even nominally Catholic universities have been “jewified” and Protestantized with anti-Catholic and anti-Christian “values” such as abortion and LGBTQXYZ traits being not only tolerated but “normalized”. Not good.
The only way out is for both Roman Catholicism and Protestantism to throw off the jewish yoke that is controlling both Christian organizations as well as government and media.
A start would be the total prohibition on “dual citizenship”. Anyone with “dual citizenship” would not be permitted to hold any position in academia, media, and government.
Best regards,
If “affirmative action” were applied regardless of racial ethnicity most people would have no problem with it, but as it has been applied, DOES devalue the (few) honest accomplishments of those of a certain race.
When one sees persons of a certain race in positions of authority and responsibility, the question arises: “How did he get there? Was it by his own honest efforts or did he benefit from “affirmative action”?
Affirmative action,as presently applied IS a stigma that has been finally abolished. It benefits no one…and sows seeds of doubt among all of those who work with those in positions of authority of a certain race.
Here is one way think of “affirmative action” as it is presently applied.
Oprah Winfrey’s child would automatically qualify for affirmative action just because of skin color while a “poorer than poor” white Appalachian child would never qualify for “affirmative action” solely because he is the “wrong race”.
“Affirmative action” should NEVER have been based on race, but, if deemed “legal”, should have been based on economic status.
and don’t forget a few sappy Catholics taught to foster a guilt complex over everything and anything. Increasingly so, now that Catholics have been Protestantized. Once they made it to growing up in a house with 23″ color TV, and more than one shithouse – life’s a breeze; go out and play football.
But, it takes all kinds. The television has been religiously visited by Catholics and Protestants alike. Curiously, adding zillions of channels beyond the original 1 to maybe 5, hasn’t changed (((TV))) one bit. [that’s where I put the Jew blame – they did a fantastic job, there; that, and advertising = big bucks].
The Asian intellectual thing is a cultural thing. Get over it, football fans of mixed English-Irish descent with your Boy Scout uniform still packed away in the memorabilia box. IQ’s are more cultural than genetic. Inbred Protestant hillbillies raised in backgrounds offering little or no advantage to getting “A’s” in school are also IQ deficient due solely to a cultural thing. The boy parades around on the football field, the girl stuffs her bra and cheer leads; math is 9th on their list of things to do, and intermediate algebra? “Oh, that’s for chinks” (there’s my proof). Coloreds, Poelocks, Sicilians, and Irishmen go the same route in their own way. I actually knew smarty coloreds in high school (Ginger-almost passing, Jersey White, Cocoa, Eggplant – didn’t matter; they all grew up in tightly wound households where bringing home a good report card was real important, and several of them, almost unbelievably, flunked out of away college once the colored “hippies” got a hold of them) So, you see…It’s cultural, babe!
OK…I see a bit of genetics in the mix. Asians have been totally isolated from Europeans and Africans since time immemorial. Very limited Asian genes ever floated into eastern Europe. And I suspect that it was for some reason (we’ll never know) solely Asian dummies that crossed the Bering Strait (maybe born losers, exiled to far NE Asia and thought “anything is better than this.” we’ll never know). Conversely, I can only remember a small handfull of whites with that “tik, tik, tik” mental math intellect – and oddly, it included ones I see no evidence of having mixed with Asians, genetically or culturally.
I don’t disagree with the supreme court striking down affirmative action. I very much disagree with how the author of this article turns this into a black vs. white thing.
In other news, this ruling will have little to no impact. Laws are like bible verses. People know them, they can recite them. but they definitely won’t live by them if they feel like it.
Already addressed in comment #4
While I don’t doubt that East Asians are generally more attentive, hard-working and possibly more commonly endowed with a facility to mental tasks that many whites are sorely lacking in, the most serious problem with the education of white children is that whites are taught to despise it from youth. They want their children to do what the other children consider normal, they want their children spending hours a day through most of the year practicing or playing sports, they DO NOT generally want to force their children to study and work. Whereas in Asia mere literacy required strict discipline from tender years in learning characters. So long as whites continue to handicap themselves, to look down on intellect and learning (something which was common in England and France, the English may have valued education as necessary but only to a certain point beyond which it became insufferable pedantry unworthy of polite company and the pre-Revolutionary French nobles went into the Army), there will be no correction of this situation. While whites are letting their daughters listen to rap music, oriental girls are studying the violin. While whites are teaching their sons to idolize negro athletes and to emphasize athletic achievement as being more important than learning, oriental children are kept busy with their studies. No matter how many talented white children there are, they cannot generally succeed in an environment where they are being systematically corrupted by the sick, twisted values of judeo-masonic America.
The good news: there will be more white students at Harvard.
The bad news: there will be more white students at Harvard.
What a bunch of crap! How come the Supreme Court is making these magnificent decisions during the (unelected) presidency of Biden. I’ve been wrestling with these decisions and their timing for awhile. Some realize, and rightly so, that the US Gov including the Supreme Court does not kowtow to the american people, and that we do not live under a “democracy”. We are mere slaves in this country and evidenced by the theft of our productivity (taxes) and a country which offers nothing to its populace as a whole.
Here’s a bit of trivia. I paid into Medicare for 51+ years and finally decided to register for my benefits. I come to find out I must pay approx $150/month for Parts A and B. And while I am still working I continue to be forced to pay approx $150/month from my paycheck. Now I was told that my Medicare doesn’t cover other things like deductibles, vision, pharmacy, extended stays, blah blah blah. So I was required to pick up a supplemental plan for another approx $225/month. Imagine that….now I pay more for Medicare ($525/month) that I ever have even after 50+ years of my pay being sequestered by the government with no way to refuse. Fucking ridiculous!
So, yeah the Supreme Court is not making these decisions based on honesty, fairness, integrity or love for their country. Its simply another mechanism that big businesses and elites have corrupted the process to get their way or to change things. These fuckwads at these universities painted themselves into a corner and realized the harm being done to their business and reputation. They needed a way out so as not to look foolish, racist or a smear on their reputation.
Anyone from the government has nothing to offer but bullshit. Regardless how supreme you might think the Supreme Court is. Its a bunch of monkeys in black robes dictating to the slaves how society will change and you will obey.
FCK the Supreme Court and FCK this corrupted US Government courtesy of the insanely psychopathic khazars that we have allowed to infiltrate unimpeded.
The Jewish kids I grew up with were a little more like the Asian kids than the White kids. They were raised to respect education and often got some form of classical-type training or other. In other words, I’d say, generally they were raised a lot better than most of the white kids. The white kids were raised to be functional retards. Now I live completely amongst whites, mostly protestants. It’s the same as before. They’re fine with living as peasants, at least now, while the living’s pretty easy. So I’d say, to at least some extent, the social rising of the Asians and the Jews to the detriment of the Whites is justified by general happy-go-lucky carelessness by the Whites.
I’m a bit surprised by this video. Mr. Taylor could easily have looked at the white percentage of Harvard students and compared it to that of the general population and seen that it is considerably below that mark. Then, he could at least have asked what percentage of that white share was Jewish, a figure which could more or less be gauged using figures from Hillel houses. Then he could have asked, Why are Gentile whites so under-represented at universities like Harvard, which were created to educate Protestant ministers? As for me, I think every university should be free to take whatever students it pleases, and the federal government should stay the hell out of it. Discrimination is a human right!
America needs better educated Americans. There is potential STEM talent galore amongst actual Americans – including, no doubt, a black American or two. Pushing Americans aside in university admissions and corporate hiring to import foreigners does nothing to help those Americans, and nothing in the long run to help America.
First step is an immigration moratorium, repatriation of all illegal aliens, and strongly encouraged repatriation of incompatible legal immigrants. Second is to break the teachers’ unions.
Both unlikely prospects right now, but both prerequisites to an American Renaissance.
In practice, probably not.
It remains to be seen if the decision is a victory or a defeat. The left is crying crocodile tears. Allowing colleges to admit students to achieve a particular racial makeup was a dangerous precedent (for the left.) If racial diversity is a legitimate goal, then racial purity could be a legitimate goal. The left could oversucceed and the POC’s might segregate themselves. That won’t happen now.
Guess which major power in Europe didn’t encourage this lack of discipline among its youth?
“The good news: there will be more white students at Harvard.”
Whatchoo talkin bout, Willis? No there won’t.
Fellow whites, yes. American-Americans, not a chance. Probably even fewer than now.
See, Harvard has this ace up its sleeve called the Harvard Law School. Edicts of the Supremes don’t stand a chance.
Excellent points.
As soon as the name John Derbyshire was mentioned, I knew this was going to be an important piece. As always, Mr. Taylor hits it out of the park.
In addition to the points he makes, I would like to add: What has this country LOST by keeping the best and brightest Asians and Whites out of universities for decades? What diseases might have been cured? What innovations didn’t we get.
The trouble with Affirmative-Action extended well beyond college admissions. It affected the larger society, and not for the better.
Chinese and Asian kids don’t “care” about the SAT any more than anyone else; they are essentially forced to “care” because colleges require higher scores from them to have the same chances of admission as other races: 140 points higher, everything else being equal, according to a study by Princeton economist Thomas Espenshade. That’s at the Ivies, but the discrimination goes down the line to the big public universities, so even low-achieving Asian kids still have to get higher scores than white, blacks, etc just to get a seat at Big State where they’ll endure the Freshman Fifteen and pass out on the overgrown lawn at Sigma Chi so they can one day get a $60,000 desk job at M&T Bank.
About the “obedient” charge, Chinese immigrants bereft of their railroad jobs after the Transcontinental RR was completed went out to work for themselves. Forget about working for the Man–they opened restaurants, shoe stores, factors, and built farms, clearing tens of thousands of acres in CA and Washington state. Self-employed and without families, they were truly on their own–and they did better and worked harder than anyone else, a truth attested to by none other than Mark Twain. Hardly obedient, they built towns where none existed and cleared swamps and forests where there there was no farmland. Like other Americans of the time, they were true rugged individualists, and arguably more so.
👌👍
👌👍
The UK and Ireland have prestigious, selective universities that have student populations that almost exactly mirror the racial makeup of their societies as a whole. Neither country considers race when admitting. The UK will consider class, but in Ireland admissions are strictly based on exam scores. I’m genuinely curious how HBD “race realists” explain why this seems to be a US only issue. It seems like the more likely explanation is that US universities are expensive and administrators would rather admit mediocre (or worse) middle and upper class minorities than poor ones who can’t pay anything.
You are possibly very young. In the America of the past, before the Jew elites destroyed the culture, White children were made to study hard and do well in school. Perhaps not with the unhealthy discipline of many Asians, but no one really wants that type of lack of balance in life. Asians are worker bees. That is not America or what Americans should be. Whites built America. Asians come and work here.
You’re missing the point. Politically it’s an example of snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. The timing was horrible. The leak was suspect. It created a plausible explanation for the Democrats to hide their election fraud behind. Then we find out that justices are apparently for sale. So the question we should be asking is who bought this abortion ruling?
>Chinese and Asian kids don’t “care” about the SAT any more than anyone else;
Yeah, sure — the SAT was required for decades, but the test prep market was minuscule — growth in the test prep ‘industry’ was initially fueled almost entirely by status-seeking Asians, who wanted to maximize their scores so they would have a better chance of being admitted to schools they viewed as offering more degree prestige (not to be confused with the quality of undergraduate education):
Test prep is a rite of passage for many Asian-Americans
Whites were always much more relaxed about it — a few decades ago when I took the test at a large, competitive, mostly white HS in California, I knew of only one guy who did any prep at all, and he was viewed as a dork — the rest of us just took the test — the Asian population then grew dramatically, as did the perceived importance of test prep.
I am disappointed that BLACKS/HISPANICS are not seizing this SCOTUS decision to question deeply the polluted entrenched culture of failure of the USA Public School System. Most Blacks/Hispanics are NOT prepared for University academic work why???. The PUBLIC educational system is absolutely control by the corrupt TEACHERS UNIONS. The Teachers Unions are more focus on homo/gay/pedo/lgbt/anal policies. Parents must challenge the STATES monopoly on Primary/Secondary public shools…and push for VOUCHER schools/academies/religious/nonreligious etc. Public education must teach Math/Sciences/ENGLISH/Civics etc.
No, and the fact you consider Asians to be “worker bees” is a problem. Because the truth of the matter is that American despise learning. It’s not about being a “worker bee.” It’s about functional proficiency, as opposed to “isn’t that cute they’re learning the Preamble to the Constitution and reading “Romeo and Juliet” and learning the quadratic formula! The problem with Americans is that they don’t even have a grasp of what a decent education would look like.
There were once German language schools in the United States. They were shut down, of course. And why was that? Just because of a war? Was America’s entrance in the war strictly about geopolitics? I don’t think the kind of people who pushed for the war could ever have been so vehement about it unless they hated German Americans and relished shutting down German language culture in America.
There were some schools based on the German gymnasium in the United States. One was called “Covington Latin School.” Of course within the last thirty years, and especially within the last ten, it has been gutted. That particular school wasn’t beloved of the Ivy Leagues the way a liberal “Country Day School” might be. It was a phenomenal school, which is why its particular culture had to be dismantled. Education in America is one of those natural fields of study for those who honestly recognize the conspiratorial view of history to be the correct view.
Anybody who talks all the time about “abortion hurting Republicans” or “the Republicans don’t care about abortion” (which may be true, but is irrelevant to the political reality of the pro-life vote and the fact that refusing to appoint justices to overturn Roe vs Wade would lose the pro-life vote) is 99% of the time someone who is upset about potential restrictions on abortion. Spare me the hand-wringing. The Democrats were going to cheat and they’re going to cheat again and the state Republican parties will set up ballot issues that are destined to fail in order to protect abortion. They don’t need an excuse to cheat, they know people like you don’t stand for anything!
Democrats don’t have this problem of people getting upset whenever the party does what its voters demand. We should have these people who are pro-abortion absolutely terrified of Republicans winning, so terrified they would support the Democrats, and spare us this outrageous fence-sitting.
“Chinese immigrants bereft of their railroad jobs after the Transcontinental RR was completed went out to work for themselves.”
Instead of… y’know, taking their wages and going back home. Go figure.
You do realize that there are many test prep courses that are offered for many tests. And most of the students are not asians. In fact, test prep is often sought out by racial minorities whose results are in that part distribution where a little bit of prep can help them to avoid a result would sink any white candidate.
Import Sub-Saharan African cognitive elites en masse as college students, and this should produce more rigorous demands for such cognitively demanding courses at this elite black Ivy League university. Igbos especially could perhaps be attractive candidates for this.
Taylor does speak Japanese to my knowledge but his wife is (non-Jewish) white, not Asian. It’s John Derbyshire who has a Chinese waifu.
Why not have scholarships fix this problem?
Not a problem at all. They are worker bees. They don’t create and invent. They do tasks and work very hard. They are limited because they lack imagination and inventiveness. They don’t produce art, music and literature. They don’t create inventions. They are little math computers but that doesn’t build a great civilization.
You are describing the America that was destroyed by Jewish elites and activists. If you think “functional retards” built the country that Asians and Jews now enjoy the fruits of, I really don’t know what to tell you.
Well, yeah, I believe that. I’m not here to promote Jews, but to state what I’ve seen, and that is that my people, in my time, have been badly lazy and careless, more so than some other groups, including,… ahem! The Jews I’ve known weren’t all that great in their diligence, I guess, just better than us, not saying that much. It has a good deal to do with where we find ourselves, IMO. I don’t absolve myself.
Democrats and others infuriated by the SC decision on AA aren’t “liberals,” accurately defined, but white-hating left-wing totalitarians. True liberals believe the law should be racially neutral and oppose and eenouce all forms of racial discrimination, including AA. White-hating left-wing totalitarians support AA and systemic reverse discrimination against whites, especially white males. so myriads of lesser qualified blacks are hired and promoted over better qualified whites, empowering blacks as a group and as individuals and disempowering whites, predominantly white men.
As for the decision against censorship and upholding freedom of speech: True liberals like Alan Dershowitz, a vanishing breed, support freedom of speech not only for themselves and those who agree with them but also those with whom they disagree and dislike or even loathe. Totalitarian leftists like Garland and Mayorkas and Obama and myriads of others and their senile and demented puppet, Joe Biden, support mass censorship. That’s why they oppose and are enraged by the SC decision.
Nobody gives a shit about this issue. The right all but conceded it for years. The Republicans had the majority necessary to legislate it after the 2002 midterms and they didn’t do it. Why now?
I’m just talking about the White kids, that is, those of Christian descent, that I grew up with. They were raised in a culture where one goes to ones job, payday is Friday, and no need to bother with anything but entertainment and other consuming activities outside of that. The Jewish kids with whom I also went to high school were raised to get involved with a little bit of political activity, at least, or show interest in such. They also pretty much universally valued education. With the White kids educational ambition was completely hit or miss. Some got good grades in school, many didn’t. We all partied together. Interest in larger world affairs was entirely nil. I don’t know about the generations before mine.
Crap, in my high school there was a “class” called “work experience”. In other words, you got credits for having a job. Kids took that “class” who had no job. They were given a broom and dustpan and walked around cleaning up. They got school credits for being janitors. 100% of them were non-Jewish White kids.
I want to know who this “Asian” demographic is. Does it include all Asians from Jordan to Indonesia, including Sri Lankans, Iranians, Tajiks, Nepalese etc? Or does “Asian” only include Chinese, Japanese, and Koreans?
I’m a computer engineer.
When I was an undergraduate, in exchange for independent study credit, I designed THE FIRST processor chip to do object recognition within digital imagery ON BOARD the reconaisance satellite taking the images, so that the satellite could IMMEDIATELY take follow-up imagery of the location using a longer focal-length lenses (in stead of how it was being done at the time — image data downloaded when the satellite passed receiving stations, image data then processed in terrestrial computers, and then at some later time, that or most likely ANOTHER satellite would be instructed to take the follow up photos… .by which time the object of interest might be gone).
I’m as proficient at programming as I am at hardware design, and so I’ve worked on both sides of the house, so to speak.
I have yet to meet a creative Chinese person.
Not once.
Not ever.
And the Indians… ugh. I’ve never met so many people who can recite entire paragraphs of definitions and rules, yet fail to understand them, let alone how to apply them properly.
We don’t need ANY Asians, although the Japs produce some capable people (and I think that’s mostly due to having lived on a resource-scarce archipelago on which 90% of the area is BARE ROCK, incapable of even growing grass, moss, or algae. To survive and even thrive in such circumstances requires not only creativity, but the rest of the society recognising and rewarding creativity (as opposed to the Indian societies, which don’t value creativity, and the Chinese, who abhor creativity to such an extent that I believe that they actually eliminated all the genes which lead to creativity from the Chinese gene-pool).
Have Blacks, Will Unravel.
White guy runs from black with a knife in one direction, Asians flee in the opposite direction.
Toronto was once white, safe, and nice. Now…
————————-
Why can’t the Supreme Court be like this?
Not until Jews are rooted out of the admissions departments.
It will probably take actions equivalent to the Nurenburg Laws (which, the Jews complaing about to this day, despite the fact that the Nurenburg Laws were merely a reflection of Talmudic law, just reversing the the Jews and pseudo-Jews role from high privileged “ingroup” to distrusted “outgroup.”
Considering what the faculty of Harvard does to the minds of its students, burning Harvard to the ground would be national service.
Just don’t tell the blacks that, or they’ll start a human-wall ring of protection around it.
Point taken. I’m not for massive immigration, but since America has relied on it so much for 3 decades now, we would definitely have some unfilled slots if we suddenly seen all the Asians dissapear at once. I completely agree with you that we need to cultivate our own tech talent. We would have to pay them appropriately and only ask for reasonable hour work weeks from them, which would make our spoiled tech companies whine a high loathsome sound. Crocodiles would be jealous of the size of the tears.
I think as Asia becomes a better place, and we continue to degenerate, some of the Asians are going to want to go back.
What a dumb Proddy
Following your SAT score + GPA + AP scores plan, Detoilet, Chicongo, etc. school boards will see to it that inner city black kid will be given straight “A”s on his/her report card from first grade until graduation…. regardless of their ability to even reach 3rd grade proficiency by the time they’re 18.
Since high schools aren’t equal, high school GPA’s shouldn’t count for anything. SAT/ACT scores and AP scores only.
Black University in Providence, Rhode Island will suffice as the newly inducted (and best) HBCU to comprise the Jivey League. Igbos are welcome. Think about it; this is an elite HBCU.
Changing the name from ‘Brown’ to ‘Black’ will keep away the Kamala Harris types.
This revised graphic goes some way toward clarifying the situation, though the colors could be chosen better. (Project for another day.) It does begin to indicate who’s actually been squeezed out over the past few decades.
“White Supremacist” is just the n-word for white people.
The principal difference being, rather than being forbidden to say it, we’re required to say it.
Resist.
They cemented control over the mass media first, and then focused upon the educational establishment. The rest, as they say, is history. “High-trust” whites never knew what hit them.
And Jews are only 2% of the population, while White non Jews are 50 to 60% of the pop. Jews are 12x over represented at the least, just like they are vastly over represented in Biden’s cabinet, all of the key positions are occupied by Jews and when one of them leaves, another one takes his place. If Hillary Clinton were to have become President and not Trump, she was going to put Merrick Garland on the Supreme Court and that would have made 4 out of 9 of the Justices as Jews….2% of the pop having nearly half of all representation. Same thing is seen with the media, even more so in banking and Hollywood.
All of the diversity is coming at the expense of White non Jews.
Does the end of affirmative action also extend to hiring?
Obviously, you’re quite impassioned about it. In fact, it is the most IMPORTANT political issue, even more important than immigration, because if white women had normal families as they had in the past, they would strongly oppose immigration.
The problem is that Americans that real education (which requires work) is bad for the child.
Subconsciously, if not consciously, they are aware that learning is despised. Dismissing asians actually taking the time to educate their children as them being “worker bees” is indeed a problem.
It doesn’t matter where you live…only a shit-for-brains would leave their home unlocked, keys in their car, etc. What is the upside of such foolishness?
When I was in 8th grade, I was accepted into a local private high school. And they decided to give me a scholarship, that necessitated me sitting down with the headmaster of the school for a discussion. It was a scholarship for “leadership.” And when I spoke to him, I honestly said (because I believed it at the time) that I wanted to be a scholar. And he was speechless. It’s an alien notion to the people who run the schools. That encapsulates American education.
Agree.
Stupid Whites never knew what hit them.
FIFY
White parents should grow up and tell their precious midwits dressed like Afficans (sons) and their precious midwits dressed like hookers (daughters) to get off their asses and study hard for these admissions tests. Rather than complain about asian kids preparing “too much” for these tests, WORK HARDER AND COMPETE WITH THEM at a higher level.
Abortion is much less a issue with White women than it is for black women. 6.5% of the population is black female and yet the majority of abortions are from them.
The issue with White women is a White problem in general – which is being attacked by the Cabal that runs the media 24/7 to push White guilt, which is reinforced by ((Hollywood)) and at public schools and Universities. Culturally – everything is geared towards making Whites feel guilty and encouraging race mixing as a way to show how that he or she isn’t like those Whites that the Jew-Tube and Jew-non-education system brainwashed them about.
Remove the Cabal and all of the anti-White attacks in it’s various forms goes away.
I agree. They tend to score better in STEM but that is not reflective of intellligence. The smartest people throughout history have been overwhelmingly White.
The SPLC took the time to publish Ms Rich’s letter explaining that she is NOT a jew (and how she and Taylor met).
Perhaps not a jew, but the jews got her (and Taylor’s back).
The most intelligently productive people have been overwhelmingly White.
>Yes, and the majority of young people in America, meaning the USA, are nonwhite
Well, that’s the problem, isn’t it? — congrats, you’ve recognized the problem: the US is no longer a white nation — it has no white supermajority, nor white racial consciousness, which in too many Whites has been eroded by decades of anti-racism media propaganda.
I don’t care about non-whites — I don’t want to see them harmed or ill-treated — but it doesn’t interest me at all whether a non-white is admitted to university ‘A’ or not, or the reason for that.
I’m a racialist, a White Nationalist — my concern is for white people and white nations — I stated my opinion elsewhere about this admissions controversy, where non-whites are fighting over places in universities founded by and for Whites: it’s disgusting.
There’s a lot of racial cowardice and stupidity on the political Right about this — many would be happy to see majority Asian classes at Harvard, as long as it’s done legally, i.e. via test scores (presumably) — and regarding the Constitution, it is just as ridiculous to think that somewhere buried in it is the ‘right’ for a woman to have an abortion, as it is to think it prohibits universities from using multiple relevant criteria of their choosing, perhaps including race, to decide who is admitted and who is not.
>White parents
White parents weren’t the ones pushing these lawsuits — also the vast majority of the white kids who are affected by competition with Asians for places at more selective schools are not ‘midwits dressed like Afficans (sons)’ or ‘midwits dressed like hookers (daughters)’.
And as I already said, the IQ and test score gap between Asians and Whites (the latter may be partly remediable via more test prep by white students) is overall of no practical significance.
You stupid faggot.
Her prose isn’t as cringily bad as Sotomayor’s. That woman is dumb.
https://www.amren.com/news/2023/07/german-opposition-leader-takes-aim-at-migration-but-largely-rules-out-working-with-far-right/
“Huguenot” Merz is an ego-addicted BlackRock vassal/agent and vain system phraseologist who achieves his personal advantage through a flexible adaptability to the respective zeitgeist. He is always right there where power, money and influence beckon. His narcissistic ego and need for recognition are virtually limitless.
Before the turn of the millennium, this guy was still spouting about downright heroic tones with regard to “foreigners,” whom he would now shamelessly brand as “Nazi.” Not much different from all his spineless party comrades. As ineffective as “Merz Spezial Dragees”. https://de.zxc.wiki/wiki/Merz_Spezial_Dragees
His grandfather https://de.zxc.wiki/wiki/Josef_Paul_Sauvigny
“Frederick the Weak” tries to speak an intelligible English.
Video Link