RSS
The Truer Narrative of the American Civil War must be…
The South fought both for and against slavery. How could that have been the case? It’s because there is more than one kind of slavery.
In the most obvious sense, the South fought to maintain the system of Social Slavery that kept the black race in bondage. The agenda of the South was clearly unjust, especially given the founding principles of the American Republic. Many in the South invoked various rationales to justify slavery.
Some invoked the Old Testament where even the laws of God allowed for owning people as chattel. Some argued that slavery, though hardly ideal, was nevertheless an improvement for blacks who’d only known savagery(and crueler forms of slavery) in the Dark Continent. Others argued that slavery was just a phase that would gradually fade away as the Southern economy developed and as blacks became more accustomed to the ways of complex civilization.
Whatever the merits of such arguments, the fact was slavery as an institution had been introduced to the New World out of greed. And given that the moral basis for America’s independence from the British Empire was liberty and freedom, the argument for slavery soured the American experiment.
One might argue that the ‘genocide’ of the American Indians was a graver ‘sin’, but in some ways, black slavery was less excusable. Regardless of whether the ‘genocide’ of Indians was worse or not, the fact was it was ‘necessary’(or a necessary evil). The American Enterprise simply couldn’t have happened without the removal of the native Indians from the ‘fruited plains’.
In contrast, blacks were not necessary for the founding and development of America. True, black labor was, for a time, hugely profitable for the white slave-owners whose economy was intricately linked with the North and with Europe. But even without black slave labor, an expanding and developing America would have been possible with white immigration and reproduction. Canada and Australia developed without black labor. Though America would have been slower to develop in the early stages without slavery, its long-term prospects would have been much better. There would have been no hugely destructive Civil War and no black social pathologies to plague the country in the coming years.
Indeed, if blacks were a net economic gain in the first half of the American experience, they became a net loss thereafter. Also, the fear of blacks came to distort so much of white culture as well as black culture. If the US had no blacks, such fears would never have materialized.
Also, white manhood would have been secure and healthier as whites would have dominated all sports and wouldn’t have had to worry about black crime and jungle fever(and the attendant cuckery among white men pussified into ‘white boys’). So, in the larger view of history, the short-term greed of relying on black slave labor proved to be America’s worst mistake and reason for undoing… just like Europe now faces the greatest threat to its existence not from Muslims but from black Africans. (But people prefer to blame the Muslims who lack the protective shield enjoyed by blacks[and homos] in the ‘woke’ West controlled by Jews.)
America is no longer safe for White people. pic.twitter.com/c2fPfm0p8K
— Stew Peters (@realstewpeters) September 12, 2023
Also, Black Slavery was bound to remain as a moral stain, paradoxically because most modern people are amnesiac. Now, if people’s memories are so poor, wouldn’t they know less about the past and be less burdened with historical ‘guilt’? Yes, IF people knew NOTHING of the past. Surely, if people today knew nothing of slavery, they couldn’t be made to feel ‘guilty’ about it. But, even as most people know little about the past, they know just enough from public education, TV, and movies to have a vague idea of what happened long ago. But because their knowledge is so thin, there is hardly an understanding of the larger historical context.
Instead, the complex past has been reduced to a few sacred icons, pat slogans, and simple Manichean narratives. Therefore, people today find it inconceivable that those living in the past were just as sure of their ethos as current progs are of theirs. ‘Wokeness’ makes people of the Current Year feel that they are the ‘most evolved’ and their ‘truth’ is the only one.
So, realizing that the past was a world racked with a host of ‘evils’ is inconceivable to them. It is no wonder that so many Current Year zealots are eager to tear down any monument that reeks of past ‘evils’. Lacking empathy and imagination, Current Year progs believe that people in the past just should have known better and intuitively arrived at all the tenets fashionable in the now. Having failed at this, the past must simply be expunged and eradicated from memory except as evil spirits summoned in annual rituals of scapegoating(or scapewhiting). In this sense, the sorry fact of American Progressivism is that people who claim to be most empathetic have no real empathy at all.
Indeed, they confuse empathy with selective favoritism of certain specially designated groups. True Empathy isn’t about feeling special affection or concern for groups favored by Political Correctness or ‘Wokeness'(which is essentially a Tri-Idolatry of Jews, blacks, and homos). Real empathy is about trying to understand different individuals, peoples, cultures, places, and times on their own terms(even if you disagree with or are appalled by those terms). PC and its worse variant ‘wokeness’ are too hyperventilating and judgmental to be empathetic. It is too busy screaming ‘racist’, ‘sexist’, ‘homophobic’, ‘transphobic’, ‘xenophobic’, and etc. to understand why different peoples in different times and places thought and acted as they did. So, even as so-called Liberals claim to own empathy, they really have none. Their idea of ‘empathy’ simply means they have blind faith and special affection for three special groups sanctified by Wokery: Jews, blacks, and homos. Also, this special sympathy is based not on knowledge or understanding of actual Jews, blacks, and homos but on trite symbolisms of black sainthood, Jewish nobility of eternal suffering, and homo angelic fruitcakery.
Ta-Nehisi Coates(aka The Nasty Coates) got a lot of mileage with white gulliberals because he gives them what they crave: Lots of Purple Prose about suppressed or denied black sanctity that deserves and needs the love of goody-good white people. He is Little Orphan Nehisi.
Real empathy, in contrast, is the ability to probe and understand why other people(or people in the past) felt justified and validated in their ways and means that seem so different from ours in the present. But today’s PC dolts are so full of themselves(and so addicted to the cult of ‘progress’ as measured by adherence to every new screeching fad) that they find it difficult to ponder the possibility as to why some people don’t believe in nonsense like ‘gay marriage’.
PC and ‘Wokeness’ are less about ideas and values than about ‘sacralized’ identities, or the Cult of Identity. So, if a certain group or identity has been deemed ‘noble’ or ‘sacred’, its demands must either be appeased. The right-or-wrong is decided not by morality, facts, or reason but by the simple fact that some groups are ‘more equal than others’.
So, even if blacks misbehave at Starbucks or act like stupid monkeys at a college graduation, the fault is not with their behavior but with those people(especially white) who treat blacks as they would have treated anyone else(by the same standards).
By facts and logic, Starbucks’ policy used to be that people who occupy a table must order something. You couldn’t just loiter as non-buying customers at a rent-paying business outfit. This rule applied equally to all individuals, regardless of race or ethnicity.
But apparently, such rules no longer apply to blacks because ‘wokeness’ deems the Negroes to be sacred. Then, it makes no sense discussing right-or-wrong because ‘wokeness’ insists that blacks are always-right-no-matter-what and that anyone who displeases blacks must be in the wrong.
U of Florida under fire for physically removing showboating Black grads.
The students wanted to "stroll"; which is "a cultural tradition in historically Black colleges."
What if I told you you could make both parties happy with one weird trick? pic.twitter.com/BEAaj4npfz
— New Paradigm (@np__review) May 8, 2018
And the same idiot logic was applied to the Florida college graduation. The rules of any graduation require all students of all races to show respect and act with dignity appropriate to the ceremony. (They can party and celebrate afterwards.) The rules apply to all students equally. But such rules no longer apply to blacks because ‘wokeness’ says blacks are always-right-no-matter-what.
So, never mind principles and rules. If blacks feel like doing something, they have a special license to do so. If anyone is ‘wrong’, it is he or she who deigns to apply the same rules to blacks. How dare he or she treat blacks like he would any other people? Doesn’t he know that blacks are always ‘right’ and that anyone who displeases them is automatically ‘wrong’?
And a similar rule applies to the Jews and the Palestinians/Iranians. Whatever Jews do, it’s ‘right’. Jews can steal uranium from the US. Jews can shoot up USS Liberty. Jews can cook up lies to invade Iraq. Jews can kill bushels of Palestinians. All those actions are ‘right’ because Jews are always right. And Iran is always wrong no matter what it does. Even if Iran complies with the nuclear deal, the Jewish-run US will find yet more excuses to declare it ‘wrong’.
And of course, we must believe that homos were always in the right, even when they acted irresponsibly in spreading sexual diseases in bath-house orgies. That is how PC really works. Its bogus ‘empathy’ is really about Emphasis of certain Favored Groups over all others. It should be called ‘emphasy’ than ‘empathy’.
Anyway, there was another aspect to the Civil War, one that has been ignored even by those partial to the Confederacy. While it’s true that the South was fighting to maintain slavery as a legal institution, in a profound way they were fighting against the prospect of biological slavery under blacks. White Southerners feared the specter of biological slavery that might result from black emancipation.
Once blacks were freed and granted equal rights, there was no guarantee that the two races would become equal and live side-by-side in harmony. If blacks were merely white people with black skin, co-existence would have been possible. Caste or no caste, the reason why India existed as a civilization for as long as it did was because darker-skinned Indians are not all that much different from light-skinned Indians in strength or temperament. Despite the genetic variations by caste, your average lower-caste person-of-dot isn’t likely to be all that different from a higher-caste person-of-dot. Indeed, to an outsider, most people-of-dot of whatever caste look pretty similar.
But this was simply not the case between whites and blacks in the South(or in the North following the Great Migration). Blacks were not simply white people with darker skin. They were noticeably more muscular, rowdier, self-centered, egotistical, and more aggressive.
Because of the fear and obedience instilled into blacks over several generations through means ranging from brutal to subtle, there was a chance that blacks might not immediately go jungle upon emancipation. But over time, as blacks would grow to realize that they are stronger, meaner, and more aggressive and that whites are anxious, fearful, and nervous, their attitude and behavior were bound to change drastically, and then the full reversion to Jungle would happen.
The first real sign of this was Jack Johnson, the tough Negro who beat up all the white males and humped tons of white women. In one way, Johnson was a tough and resilient challenger to racial discrimination and white supremacy. But in another way, he was the template of the looming biological slavery of whites under black supremacy. Johnson-ism meant black guys would whup and humiliate white males who would be robbed of their manhood and therefore their womenfolk as well(just like bigger and taller white and black American soldiers robbed little Japanese guys of their manhood and womenfolk after their defeat in WWII. To this day, Japanese men have not recovered from their humiliation. They are a race of dogs.) As Black Pigeon Speaks argues, women have a weak sense of tribal loyalty. They just go with the Power or the Winner:
And as white manhood would be humiliated by black manhood that dominates sports and street violence, there would come a time when white men would become the biological slave-cucks of blacks, and white women would lose respect for white men and surrender to jungle fever and accept ACOWW or Afro-Colonization of White Wombs. (Consider the blonde girl in the movie SPECTACULAR NOW who dumps her white boyfriend and goes with a big athletic Negro who later even physically threatens the ‘pussy-ass white boy’ who is reduced to giving him tips on how to make the white girl love him better. Total cuckery, but this is what the Jewish-run Hollywood promotes to white kids as a moral-racial ideal, and whites have now totally internalized this message as social justice.)
Of course, do-goody naive white Liberals and cunning Jews(who mentally enslaved the white race into stupid cattle in service to Jewish supremacism) understood how these fears were an impediment to social change. If whites, especially the males, understood the full implications of black emancipation and racial integration, they would have realized the end-result would be biological slavery under tougher, stronger, and rowdier blacks.
So, ‘anti-racist’ radicals sought to assuage white fears by presenting blacks as sexless noble Uncle Toms always falsely accused of raping white women. Or consider how the early interracial propaganda focused on a white man and a black woman when, in fact, the main threat was that white men would lose white women to black men.
Cunning Jews played it both ways, presenting blacks as both sexless angels who would never rape anyone AND sexy dancers whose performances would liberate white folks from puritanical repression. Even today, Jews play both tropes at once, and so many white people still fall for the nonsense. White kids are bombarded with both the (To Kill a)MOCKINGBIRD and the MANDINGO tropes about blacks. There is no rhyme or reason to any of this, but then, ‘wokeness’ is less about right-and-wrong of ideas and facts than about the righteous sanctity of certain favored groups.
Since ‘wokeness’ deems that blacks are always right, the trope that makes blacks out to be sexless spiritual saints(as in GREEN MILE) is ‘right’ but so is the trope that says blacks are SO awesome as masterful big-donged muscled super-studs(or big-booty-shaking hot-mama skank-ass ho’s) that other races must sensually surrender to blackness and join in the jungle jive of vibrant liberation.
Political Correctness and ‘wokery’ warp moral logic into nonsense. For this reason, ‘wokeness’ is best understood as a neo-religion. In religion, God is always right, even when He seems to do wrong. The idea is that God is so above us insignificant earthly creatures that He lives by a truth and logic far beyond our comprehension. It would be wrong for us to demand consistent logic from Him, as the Book of Jobs says. Likewise, ‘wokeness’ says it is futile for us to invoke reason, logic, and facts in relation to blacks, Jews, and homos. Doing so would be ‘racist’, ‘antisemitic’, or ‘homophobic’. We must blindly honor, worship, and serve them on the basis of faith.
Anyway, there was no guarantee that the long-term result of ending socio-legal slavery in the South would result in racial equality and harmony. It could very well lead to white people becoming biologically enslaved by stronger, tougher, more aggressive, more muscular, and more dangerous blacks.
This danger was bound to increase as America became more individualistic, hedonistic, and vulgar, not least due to black influences in music, comedy, and attitudes. If the US were a theocracy or strict ‘ideocracy’(one that metes out harsh punishment to those who act out of line, as in Cuba or a Muslim country where blacks better behave or else), perhaps black aggression could have been curtailed even upon emancipation. But as the US was a fast-changing democracy with increasing freedom and liberties in the pursuit of happiness, it was only a matter of time before blacks lost all their inhibitions and made ‘muh dick’ and ‘muh fist’ the central themes of their culture. And today, in the 21st century, we are living in a thoroughly pornfied culture when even kids watching Disney or attending kindergarten are really partaking of kiddie porn.
Everything that D.W. Griffith prophesied in THE BIRTH OF A NATION came true. If that movie made many people uncomfortable in the past because it seemed like paranoid fantasy, it is bound to make people uncomfortable today because it now seems factual. The movie said freedom is bound to turn too many blacks into uninhibited thugs and pimps, and guess what the main cultural expression of blacks is today? Rap music, the main message of which is ‘muh dick’ and ‘muh fist(or gun)’. And look at the state of black-run communities in Gary, Detroit, Baltimore, St. Louis, parts of Chicago, Newark, and etc.
And the movie warned about naive white cuck-politicians and cunning light-skinned Negroes who shamelessly hustle suckers into buying into fantasy of racial harmony. D.W. Griffith’s THE BIRTH OF A NATION was a great prophetic work. What he warned eventually came to be. Blacks have reverted to jungle savagery. Their music is rap, their dance is ‘twerking’, and their culture is thuggery. And Pop Culture is now mostly about Jungle Fever. And not only in the US but in Canada and the EU. And of course, whites fell for the mulatto charlatan Barack Obama.
Anyway, the loss of manhood and cuckery are a form of slavery. The dark fact is white manhood cannot survive integration with harder-muscled, meaner-tempered, and bigger-donged Negroes. Eventually, white men will turn into ‘white boy’ cucks, and white women will go with Negroes and their wombs will be colonized to produce the likes of Colin Kaepernick whose anti-white virulence is less about Racial Injustice than sheer contempt for wussy-ass whitey.
After all, his mother rejected the men of her own race and chose to have a child with a tough Negro. Even though his black father abandoned him and even though a nice white family went to the trouble of raising him, Kaepernick associated whiteness with wussy weakness and associated blackness with power and manhood. Blackness = studly power that conquers white vaginas and wombs. Whiteness = cucky weakness that raises a child of a black guy who humped a white woman and took off.
Due to their wilder nature, blacks don’t much appreciate weakness, no matter how kind and caring it is. They instinctively see it as ‘faggoty-ass’ and ‘pussy’. So, all the love Kaepernick got from his adoptive white family hardly left an impression on him. He just wanted to get away from such wussy weakness and be accepted by the badass brothas.
When white people brought over a stronger and meaner race to be slaves in the US, they got caught in a Moral Trap. Socio-legal Slavery controlled blacks and kept their savagery in check, but it was unjust and sometimes cruel. But freeing the slaves meant eventual disaster for the white race because too many blacks happened to be built like Mike Tyson, Lennox Lewis, and Jim Brown. And too many black women are crazy and loud ‘biatches’ whose antics in music and dance encourage the most savage and trashy behavior among women of all races. Abraham Lincoln sensed all this, which is why he said something to the effect, “We have to free the ‘groids’ and then ship them back to Africa, because, if we don’t, they will kick our butts and hump our daughters.” The South should have sought secession from blacks, not from northern whites. Abraham Lincoln’s dream was to send blacks back to Africa or give them their own country, and strengthen racial unity between northern whites and southern whites. Instead, the South seceded from northern whites and were sagged with a huge black population.
It is time to face the truth. The South was in a bind. True, they did fight to preserve ugly social slavery. But they were trying to prevent horrid biological slavery of white race being physically and sexually dominated by tougher and nastier Negroes.
Furthermore, it is about time we understood the importance of manhood. It’s time to assess the harms of Toxic Cuckery. A society cannot be healthy unless its men feel manly pride and are respected by their womenfolk. Indeed, it’s often been said that one of the humiliating things about slavery was that black manhood was trampled upon. As black men had to shuck-and-jive before the massuh, who might have some fun with a chocolate-titted mama, they could not be full men. This was especially humiliating because black slaves knew they could kick the white boy’s arse if they were to face each other one-on-one. But whites had all the guns, and the laws were on their side. Blacks had to suffer the humiliation of being ordered around by white men who were weaker than them.
So, in order for black men to gain the pride of manhood, they needed to be freed. So far so good. But the problem with black freedom was that black manhood now posed a serious threat to white manhood. Due to the BAMMAMA — blacks are more muscular and more aggressive — factor, legal equality between blacks and whites was bound to lead to biological supremacy of blacks over whites. This meant blacks kicking white butts in sports, a big deal in the modern world where so much of social, communal, national, and racial pride & prestige are invested in and expressed through sports. White male defeat to blacks in sports meant whites losing their iconic status as Real Men. Is it any wonder that so many white wombs get colonized by black men while so many white guys are turning into cucks and wussies(and trannies)?
Indeed, ANTIFA is like radical cuckery. These white boys are so invested in their own inferiority and submission at the feet of blacks that they get triggered by any white guy who says NO to such humiliation. To ANTIFA, the rightful place for whites in the West is as biological slaves to blacks who are deemed superior both morally(due to Slavery and Jim Crow narrative) and physically(as they easily kick white butt in sports and conquer white wombs).
And yet, by beating up ‘nazis’ in the name of protecting blacks and other minorities, ANTIFA guys pretend to be alphas, without whom blacks wouldn’t presumably be safe. So, ANTIFA guys both worship blacks as their superiors(in holy victimhood and badass style) and patronize blacks as their inferiors(or a powerless people in need of white knights to defend them). How screwier can things get?
Entire Stadium BOOS Black National Anthem!!!
White people are so deluded with Toxic Cuckery. They BOO at the Black National Anthem but pay big bucks to take part in a Sports Culture in which black athletes dominate the field and emasculate white males and hump tons of white women. Black National Anthem is most appropriate for the NFL as it’s about Black Supremacy over sappy-head white cuckery.
If black male psychology was so traumatized in the slavery era because black men were denied full manhood and the respect of their women, the same logic applies to whites today. White society cannot be psychologically healthy unless white men have their manhood back in their own secure racial spaces. But this is impossible with racial integration because biological slavery will reduce white guys into cucky ‘white boys’ at the feet of tougher and meaner blacks as their eternal biological massuhs. And the fall of white manhood will mean the fall of the white race. White women will not respect ‘loser men’, which is what white men become when integrated with black males.
There are many reasons for the decline of the white male in America, especially among the working class, and one reason has to do with the demoralizing loss of manhood and cuckish emasculation vis-a-vis blacks. Both Abraham Lincoln and D.W. Griffith were right. They both acknowledged the problems of slavery but also understood that freedom would lead to a new kind of slavery. It is too bad that whites in the South failed to come to terms with Honest Abe and settle on some grand plan to free the blacks and send them back to Africa where the Negroes could harass hippos but not white folks.
English
Arabic
Chinese (Simplified)
Dutch
French
German
Hebrew
Hindi
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Russian
Spanish
Swedish
Turkish
Vietnamese
The employment of a vast slavocracy in various colonies — not just the American South — for no reason but to supply Europeans with their morning coffee and other treats, was Schopenhauer’s go-to example for the intrinsic evil and selfishness of humans.
What then, must we do about it?
No matter how many times I hear it, I seriously doubt that Germans really are the largest Ethnic Group in America. The claim that they are is, I suspect, merely a lie concocted by (((them))) to defame White Americans, particularly those in the Mid West.
The author begins his article by telling us that black slavery was evil, and then proceeds to make the best argument I ever heard for bringing it back.
Pre-politically correct bumper sticker on a pickup truck:
“If I’d known how much trouble this would have caused, I’d have picked my own damn cotton.”
You can tell who has the power by who you cannot make fun of.
Southerners knew. Thomas Jefferson early-on warned of the consequences of letting go of the wolf’s ears.
Later, in his 1906 memoir, Confederate veteran Col. Walter H. Taylor reported on forty years of progress and prophesied for the future:
“Here is cause for reflection for the philanthropist: The negro under a condition of servitude, acknowledging his subordination to his superiors, is well mannered and contains himself within the bounds of perfect and unfaltering respect for the white race when no one is near to make him afraid. The same negro, with the supposed advantages for freedom and education, after the expenditure of much money and time in the effort to elevate him, becomes a wild beast and a terror, a prey to uncontrollable passion. How shall this be explained?
“Is it not fairly chargeable to the vicious legislation at the close of the war, -by which it was sought to humiliate the people of the south,-to the unqualified enfranchisement of the blacks and to the corrupt teaching of the meddling and misguided fanatics who came among the negroes and implanted in their minds erroneous and dangerous notions as to their rights and privileges, so that, with vast numbers of them, and their conception of freedoms unbridled license, and their tendency to a life of idleness, immorality, and crime is truly sad and disheartening.”
Neither Mr. Jefferson nor Col. Taylor had an answer to the problem, probably assuming the self-perpetuating results.
A famous landscape architect, in his era, Frederick Olmsted, toured the South in the 1850s, before the Civil War. His first-hand account was a very interesting glimpse into the South. It became widely published during that antebellum era.
The vast majority of the Southern white population were not slave holders, but rural and small-town residents. Olmsted toured many plantations and small white farms. They differed significantly. The plantations were big business operations, usually well run (not always though) with much income, so he observed that the food and clothing provided to the slaves were far superior to the struggling white farmers. He found many of the small white farmers were barely surviving. Their poverty was beyond awful. The slaves depressed the wages of those poor rural southern whites. So these poor whites were not happy with the slavery institution and the 8000 or so slaveowners running them, but they were far more deeply opposed to recognizing the blacks as their equals.
Given this, you might wonder why the whites would not work on the plantations where the black slaves were materially far better off than them. Olmsted said it was because the whites refused to work side by side with the slaves, believing it was too demeaning. Olmsted believed, based on his observations, that the South could have easily supplied all need labor on those plantations by employing those poor white farmers. instead of slaves. The southern economy would have lifted huge numbers of whites out of poverty by abolishing slavery and sending the blacks back to Africa.
Our schools don’t teach from first-hand accounts that are based on factual observations. Instead, they teach based on narratives unconnected to factual observations. They fail to recognize that the slaves were usually better off materially, by far, than the poor white rural southern farmers. They also fail to recognize that plantations use of cost-free slave labor kept the southern economy mired in poverty.
In mentioning Jack Johnson, the author forgets that Johnson was a boxer. Yes, he did whup a lot of white ass and hump a lot of white women -but puhleeze, give us the full context. Johnson was a show-boater who couldn’t stop talking about how he kicked whitey’s ass. The author’s emotional analysis is correct, but delinquent of certain facts. If he were just some random Negro doing the same thing, his ass would have been shot off long before. Johnson used the boxing rink as his cover. Secondly, in WW II, blacks were not really in positions to associate with Japanese women on any large scale or make cucks out of Japanese guys. Blacks were much more a part of this phenomenon in Vietnam. Besides, today, Japanese men are the most faggoty bunch I’ve laid my eyes on. I blame it on ANIME not WW II. (said with a wry smile).
How in the hell did those White dudes back then sleep with Native American females, much less dark as coal 100% African females??? Look at some of those Injun squaws, if that isn’t bad enough, look at some of those pictures of Negro purebloods. And not one Negro buck looked like Ken Norton. Norton is probably 20% White.
Just think how much America would be different is the South, instead of fighting the Civil War, just liquidated all their slaves instead.
What a paradise!
Well Lincoln did wish to send them all back to Wakanda. Why didn’t Andrew Johnson and then Grant follow through??
Just like they only bring up Slavery in order to justify the depredations of the Union Army on the Southern Population; they only bring up The Holocaust in order to rationalize the War crimes that the US Military, in its turn, carried out against the German civilians during and after The Second World War. I have always found that to be really interesting to ponder!
Kyle (((Elihu))) Onstott? A California Jew writing a fictional book about slavery in the Deep South. No mention of the Jew role in slavery I am sure.
Chances are any sexual relations between a White woman and a Black man back then involved rape. So that part is definitely a fairy tale.
White males boinking African females? Good gawd, those were some horny mofos.
I made the same mistake. I thought this was another anti-Southern diatribe but as I kept reading he consolidated the whole argument bit by bit, and the photos added impact.
He was certainly not alone in pointing the finger. Even so …
During the period of the transatlantic slave trade, 5 percent of the slaves were brought to continental North America. The remaining 95 percent went to Cuba, other islands in the Caribbean, and South America. Brazil was, overwhelmingly, the primary destination.
While the Narrative usually pins the label “slave trader” primarily on the Portuguese, more than half of the soi-disant Portuguese traders were Jews. Tikkun olam, darkies!
Of course, during the same period, black Africans enslaved other black Africans—both for their own use and for sale to Muslim nations—in even greater numbers than those in which they sold them to transatlantic conveyors. Moreover, the Muslims also continued to enslave white Europeans, especially Slavs, into the nineteenth century. This is a “bad fact” that only racists and anti-Semites ever mention, however.
Meanwhile, back in Africa, slavery and, to a greatly reduced extent, the trade in slaves continue to this day.
Taken all in all, it’s well past time for whites—by which I mean Gentiles: i.e., real whites—to refuse to allow themselves to be browbeaten by references to virtue-signaling eighteenth- and nineteenth-century philosophers, whose own breakfasts frequently included café crème and croissants.
________
Furthermore, slavery and the slave trade are in the process of being reenabled on a global basis thanks to the huge advances in the technologies of surveillance, both real-life and online, and even more frighteningly, of enforcement.
In a 2021 interview that is part of the Planet Lockdown collection, Catherine Austin Fitts had some pointed observations on the subjects of slavery and technology and what the Jews who rule us hope to implement very soon:
It is first and foremost an anti-white diatribe, as all of Jung-Freud’s interminably ranting essays end up being, however they may start out.
_______
Addendum to jluker and G. Poulin: Jung-Freud is a she, not a he.
Trinity: “Well Lincoln did wish to send them all back to Wakanda.”
That’s one of the numerous historical illiteracies in this asinine article.
Lincoln didn’t wish to “send” them anywhere. He’s on record stating that any departures had to be voluntary. The most that can be said is that he sometimes “wished” that they’d leave, or at least, that’s what he said. Of course, he also knew that they wouldn’t. He expected the vast majority of them to stay and vote Republican forever. Shocking, I know, that a politician would act like that.
Trinity: “Why didn’t Andrew Johnson and then Grant follow through?? ”
They followed Lincoln’s example perfectly. After slavery, negroes were always free to leave. They still are. Problem is, they don’t.
History demonstrates that rounding them up and “sending” them anywhere is beyond the moral capacity of the white Christian degenerates, then or now.
Because despite a few earlier comments, Lincoln’s actions suggested he changed his mind. First, the Emancipation Proclamation, then giving them guns to kill White Southerners, then giving them citizenship and eventually this led to their suffrage. Doesn’t sound like he was planning to get rid of them, does it? Kinda hard to Constitutionally deport citizens enmasse based on race.
I find it nauseating this oft repeated lie about Lincoln’s intentions regarding Blacks. I know, blah blah blah, he said a few things once.
Thomas Carlyle, in his Occasional Discourse on the Nigger Question, defended slavery. He was incandescent that freed blacks in the British Caribbean were too idle to work for wages, so no-one was harvesting the sugar cane; therefore . . .
The most anti White film on slavery was some early 1970s flick called, “Goodbye Uncle Tom.” In his book, “My Awakening”, David Duke describes how he and a couple friends watched this garbage in a theater filled almost entirely with Blacks. The ending shows a modern day Black killing a White family including a baby. Duke describes how the audience cheered with delight. Remember folks, Blacks just want equality. Lolol. Yeah right.
My southern ancestors despised slavery because it kept them poor. Write about what you know.
Most of Jack Johnson’s “girlfriends” were former prostitutes.
Of all the Black heavyweight champions, Sonny Liston Larry Holmes, Joe Frazier, Deontay Wilder and Jack Johnson appeared to be the blackest. Joe Louis had White and Native American blood as did featherweight, lightweight, and welterweight champ, Henry Armstrong. Ali reportedly had some distant Irish ancestry.
Liston, Holmes, Wilder and Johnson were probably as close to purely Black than any other heavyweight champ. No cohencidence that these guys were all born in the South. Holmes born in Georgia, Johnson in Texas Liston in Arkansas, and Wilder in Alabama. Joe Frazier was born in South Carolina. Nearly all the past great Black fighters were from the South, Ray Robinson, Ezzard Charles, Tiger Flowers from Georgia, Joe Louis from Alabama, Henry Armstrong and Archie Moore from Mississippi, etc. Even Ray Leonard was born in North Carolina. Liston and Tyson were the only ones who were genetic freaks.
There have been just a few black African & Caribbean boxers of note, Azumah Nelson, Lennox Lewis, Razor Ruddock, Livingstone Bramble, Emile Griffith, John Mugabi, Ike Ibeabuchi, and the great Dick Tiger, maybe a few others. Matter of fact South Africa produced probably more world class White fighters, particularly in the heavyweight division.
Cuba’s been a boxing giant
So he was fishing in the cesspool to begin with, not coaxing respectable white women into his bed because of his dong size.
Yep. Johnson also grew up in Galveston, Texas and had poor Whites as playmates. He said he would often eat cookies at his playmates house. So much for how poor rednecks were so cruel to the poor negro. The Whites who generally abused the negro were wealthy Whites or sometimes sadistic police officers/sheriffs, Whites with power. Rarely did Cooter, Skeeter, or Booger go Coon Hunting for the fun of it. Anderson Cooper’s ancestors were slave owners for instance. The same White cucks that suck BBC today had ancestors that might have cracked a whip on some Black’s back long ago.
Thanks to Russkie trainers and training methods.I forgot about Julian Jackson from the Virgin Islands. P4P, one of the greatest punchers of all time.
There are still German speakers in Wisconsin after two world wars against Germany because there were that many Germans living there. My mother’s hometown was in Iowa, was nearly entirely German and Catholic as were the neighboring villages. I don’t think you have a clue how many Germans settled in the Midwest, are one of those “Americans” who doesn’t know their genealogy because they are descended from escaped white slaves?
The Upper Midwest was also a land of hyphenated Americans. In 1900, this region counted over 26 million persons, making it the most populated census region of the country. And over 44 percent of these Americans had either both or one parent who were foreign-born. In Illinois, the figure was 51 percent; in Wisconsin, 71 percent; in Minnesota, 75 percent. In the whole of the United States, one out of every four males of voting age was foreign-born; in the Upper Mississippi Valley, nearly half were.
The dominant hyphenated groups in 1900, by any measure, were the Germans and the Scandinavians. A survey of foreign language newspapers in the United States in 1892 counted: 727 German-language newspapers (including six dailies in Milwaukee alone), 112 Scandinavian newspapers, 40 French papers, and 28 Spanish papers. The Germans were the most assertive, as well as the most numerous. In 1900, the Census Bureau counted 6,255,000 persons with both parents having been born in Germany; another 1,585,000 persons with one German-born parent; for a total of 7,820,000, over 11 percent of the United States population. Heaviest concentrations of these German-Americans were in the rural regions of Wisconsin, Illinois, Iowa, and Michigan. Half were Roman Catholic; a fair number of the rest belonged to the Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod, sternly orthodox, emphasizing clerical authority, and committed to parochial schools using the German tongue.
https://chroniclesmagazine.org/society-culture/the-midwestern-identity/
Donald Trump is half German and half Hebridean. None of his grandparents spoke English as their first language. The rednecks see this Queens boy as their own because his mother was Presbyterian and he went to Norman Vincent Peale’s Dutch Reformed Church, his hair is light and his face is red. Deracinated people, for sure!
What’s more, much of the Southern white population are people who have settled in the sunbelt, coming from the North. In 1900, Iowa had more whites than Texas, and Texas had a large German minority even then.
We have a lot of Southern and Appalachian people from small towns who think they are the only Americans, the “real Americans.” Those people aren’t really the same ethnic group as the Yankees anyway. If we really split up the British descended ethnicities the way they should be, then none of them are more numerous than German Americans. Trump is a great example of someone half German half British but not English and not “old stock.”
As for those who say America has always been “Protestant” – that’s a very deceptive picture, given the number of Catholics who’ve come here. “Protestant” (megachurchian) buildings today are full of ex-Catholics, and it’s always been that way. All European prods are descended from Catholics anyway. The example of Trump shows: the white identity isn’t really about “old stock” British identity at all.
One more thing to consider: without Germans Americans and Catholics, there is no right-leaning conservative voting block that can hope to win elections in this country.
The only people pushing Anti-German American and Anti-Catholic lines are ignorant trash or they are working for the government to foment division among conservatives.
More than likely most Whites of European descent in America are mixed ethnically. German-Irish, Scots-Irish, German-Norwegian, Irish-Italian, etc. Used to be Italian males would marry Jewish females, not as common as WM/AF or BM/WF, but more common than any other White mixing with Jews.
The Upper Midwest has NEVER been the most populated region in America, that has belonged to the Boston-Washington Corridor for a long, long time. Around 50 million people in the Boston- Washington megapolis alone. Now the South which consists of 16 states has about 114-115 million appears to be the most populated section of America today despite its reputation for being Hicksville, USA. Of course the BosWash corridor is much denser and only parts of 6-7 states. So a third of all Americans live in the South.
I thought Trump was German and Scottish?
Great Lakes mega region only has more people when you include Canadian cities. Take out the Canadian cities and the Boston-Washington area is probably more populated and being smaller, much more dense. But no way did that region have that many people in the early 1900s. Minneapolis, Detroit, and Milwaukee were small compared to Philly, Boston and Baltimore, only Chicago was a decent size city.
But could the Russkie trainers have gotten the same results with North Koreans, Bulgarians, Vietnamese, or Armenians?
Japanese fighter Nagoya Inoue is one of the best P4P boxers in the world. He has won 4 world titles. Manny Paquiao, the Filipino, another all time great. Yoko Gushikin was another great Japanese fighter of note in the late 1970’s-early 1980’s. Been a few Korean champions, but the only two to come to mind at the moment is Chong-pal Park, a super middleweight world title holder in the 1980s and Kim Ki-soo, a jr. middlweight champ in the 1960’s. There was even an Aborigine boxing champ named Lionel Rose. Considering Olympic sports like judo and taekwando are far more popular than boxing in the Orient as well as other martial arts, Orientals have done pretty well in the Sweet Science. Now India is a nation that I cannot think of one single world champion boxer. Wrestling? Sure. The Great Gama for one.
Btw, a lot of boxers are terrible athletes when they try other sports
The author made an error using the term “upper Midwest” when he was referring to the Midwest as a whole. In the Census report “the North Central division” comprises the Midwestern states.
https://www2.census.gov/prod2/statcomp/documents/1901-02.pdf
1900 census regions of the the USA, look up the white populations by state. Use common sense, Chicago, St. Louis, Detroit, Cleveland, Cincinnati and Milwaukee had higher rankings in population than they do now. So even in urban population, the Midwest had a much larger proportion of the population at that time than it does now. If you add in the rural population, where Iowa was ranked tenth in population (more whites than Texas) despite having no great cities – it’s easy to grasp the Midwest had a much larger rural population than the Northeast. Pittsburgh-Allegheny was one of the largest cities in the country, and while it is part of Pennsylvania it is in the Mississippi Basin and is more like the Midwest than the East demographically.
And if you can’t grasp that, count the electoral votes and subtract the Senators:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1904_United_States_presidential_election
Illinois and Ohio had 50 electoral votes. Kansas, Nebraska, the Dakotas, Iowa and Minnesota had 50. Wisconsin, Michigan, Indiana and Missouri had 60. 160 – 24 = 136 Congressional districts.
NY, PA and CT had 80 electoral votes. MA, NH, VT and ME have 30. That leaves 19 for NJ, DE and RI. 129 – 20 = 109.
Now if only white citizens were counted, we can see that the Midwest in 1900 dwarfed the South in white population. Now we can subtract part of Missouri’s population as “Southern” – but that is more than compensated by adding parts of PA as being more Midwestern than eastern in character, as it is on this side of the mountains and is in the Mississippi basin.
When we consider the proportion of the Midwestern whites born overseas that settled in the Midwest throughout the 19th Century, not even considering immigrants in the Northeast and West, then we can see that the the birth controlling mainline Protestant English are unlikely to contribute the majority of the US white population. Perhaps not even a plurality.
Cubans won 9 golds out of 12 in 1992 Olympics boxing.
That is an interesting point. I never thought of that, before.
All of the author’s comments about so-called Black dominance in sports got me thinking. First,Sports culture in America experienced an abrupt transformation in the 60’s. In the 50’s, the two most televised and popular sports were Boxing and Baseball, and in the 60’s this changed to Football and Basketball- 2 sports that reward biological abnormality over athleticism. It’s not an athletic achievement to grow 7 feet tall, but it is sure an advantage for playing basketball. Similarly, it’s not an athletic achievement to weigh 350 lbs., but it’s a big advantage for playing 7 out of the eleven positions on the football field. Baseball is still dominated by whites, and boxing has become so white that Jewish ESPN no longer covers it- except for the occasional biopic tribute to Cassius Clay/Muhammad Ali. Regarding American football, I watch a fair amount of high school football and have noted that white private school teams in my locale typically beat black public school teams loaded with so-called ‘Division 1 talent” Most of these talented black athletes have no business being in college, except perhaps on the south end of a northbound broom. The apparent black superiority in sports is another example of jewish contrived affirmative action which applies across the board in all areas of competitive endeavor They need to create a class of black millionaires and basketball and football provide that for them. Name 2 black professions?- professional football and professional basketball.
Amateur and professional boxing are 2 different worlds. Sure there have been Olympic medal winners who obtained success as professionals, but there were also Olympic medal winners who never panned out. Dwight Qawi and Bernard Hopkins never even had an amateur bout and other world champions had very limited amateur careers. Henry Tillman beat Tyson twice in the amateurs but was flattened by Tyson in 1 round as a pro. Had the Cuban Teofilio Stevenson boxed against the top notch pro heavyweights of the 1970’s and early 1980’s he would barely make it in the top 10.
Not quite – 7 golds and 2 silvers. Regardless, still a performance for the ages.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuba_at_the_1992_Summer_Olympics#
Johnson’s mentor in boxing was a white American heavyweight of Polish-Jewish ancestry named Joe Choynski, who was ten years Johnson’s senior. Choynski knocked out a young Johnson in an illegal bout. The two men were jailed briefly after the bout and in jail became close friends. Choynski then became Johnson’s trainer.
Johnson, if anything, was a man out of time, as it is put. I’m not the uncharitable type. I’m always willing to recognize things. Johnson is another addition to my list of people who lived to see the atomic bomb.
Great essay except for the small omission that there was no threat to slavery “where it existed” in 1860. The Republican Party platform (Plank 4) specifically guaranteed continued federal noninterference with slavery where state law gave it legal existence. The bone of contention was the expansion of slavery into the new midwestern territory, which the majority of the American electorate demanded be open for white family homesteading, containing the race problem to the south. This came also in response to the recent gutting by the arrogant slaveholder lobby in Washington of decades of carefully built compromises that had held the fragile Union together. Compromise was no longer acceptable to the new oligarchy that had come to rule the Southland after the economic catastrophes of the 1830s propelled it into the front rank over the old families. These men were the Deep State of their time, contemptuous of democracy, and furious that they had finally lost control of the Executive Branch of the national government, which they had long enjoyed with the connivance of the hugely corrupt northern Democratic Party machine. The Republican Party formed to break their stranglehold on power, not to abolish slavery.
The great southern statesman John Calhoun summed up their class ambition as early as 1812, telling a fellow congressman at the start of that year’s session, “I admit your conclusions in respect to us Southrons — that we are essentially aristocratic. I cannot deny but we can and do yield much to democracy; this is our sectional policy. We are from necessity thrown upon and solemnly wedded to that party, however it may occasionally clash with our feelings, for the conservation of our interests. It is through our affiliation with that party in the Middle and Western States we control, under the Constitution, the governing of the United States; but when we cease thus to control this nation through a disjointed democracy, or any material obstacle in that party which shall tend to throw us out of that rule and control, we shall then resort to the dissolution of the Union.”
When war came forty-nine years later, another statesman, Robert Winthrop, had this accurate analysis, “Let us remember we are not engaged in a war of the North against the South, but in a war of the nation against those who have risen up to destroy it.”
Many years earlier, during the War of Independence, John Adams delineated the problem that plagues us to this day. In a 1775 letter to General Horatio Gates he wrote, “All our misfortune arises from a single source, the reluctance of the Southern colonies to republican government … The difficulties lie in forming constitutions for particular colonies, and a continental constitution. This can only be done on popular principles and maxims which are so abhorrent to the inclinations of the barons of the South, and the proprietary interests in the middle colonies, as well as that avarice of land which has made upon this continent so many votaries to Mammon that I sometimes dread the consequences.”
Japan won 9 Golds, 2 Silvers, 1 Bronze in judo at the 2020 Olympics. No surprise there because judo is Japan’s forte. Boxing and baseball are popular in Cuba so it stands to reason they would excell in those sports. Chinese are a powerhouse in Olympic weightlifting, whereas it used to be dominated by the Soviets. More Chinese taking up the sport whereas before it probably wasn’t that popular in China. The best heavyweights are probably playing in the NFL and NBA. Had these guys took to boxing as kids instead of football and basketball, some might have done well.
Those guarantees to not interfere in slavery (like all Yankee guarantees) were worthless. Before the election of 1860 occurred the Republican Party had rallies where they were marching in torch-lit parades in uniform. If the preservation of the Union was a priority then the secret six would have been prosecuted and hanged. If you won’t stop Yankees from fomenting slave rebellions, the promise is worthless.
Mohammedans sat on two large European peninsulas for centuries. Europeans have good reasons to be alarmed by their presence. It’s called “institutional memory”. How’s Constantinople these days? Alexandria?
Blacks may make a bigger mess, but they can’t actually run anything. Saracens and Seljuks can– you.
Jack Johnson did not like Joe Louis at all and I believe he would sometimes offer some of the Brown Bomber’s White opponents tips on how to beat Louis. Quick boxers with good footwork were kryptonite to Louis so perhaps Johnson in his prime would have fared well against Louis. Billy Conn at only 170lbs had Louis beat for 13 rounds before he got cocky, and Jersey Joe Walcott was robbed in his first fight with Louis. Walcott floored Louis 4 times in 2 fights. Walcott definitely won the first fight against Louis.
At the smaller weight and for women
Please read the ‘Address on Colonization to a Deputation of Negroes’ dated August 14, 1862. It conveys “the substance of the President’s remarks.” Of course, Lincoln wished to “send them anywhere.” The anywhere was Liberia and Hayti. Also read Lincoln’s second annual message to Congress on December 1, 1862. In other words, Doc, read original sources.
Max Schmeling did pretty well against Joe Louis also. Schmeling also was a small heavyweight.
Lincoln invaded the south to make the Southerners bow down and pay their taxes. The American Civil war was a tax rebellion. Nobody ever goes to war to do something nice for someone else. No other wars in the history of the world were fought to end slavery. Lots of wars were fought to make the people pay taxes.
Read Lincoln’s First Inaugural Address on March 4, 1861 at http://www.abrahamlincolnonline.org. In the first few paragraphs he states very clearly that:
a) he will do nothing about slavery because he has no authority to do so and he has no inclination to do so.
b) he will start killing the Southerners if they don’t pay their taxes or if they fire on one of his forts.
Read it and weep.
Anon[393]: “Please read the ‘Address on Colonization to a Deputation of Negroes’ dated August 14, 1862. It conveys “the substance of the President’s remarks.” Of course, Lincoln wished to “send them anywhere.” The anywhere was Liberia and Hayti. Also read Lincoln’s second annual message to Congress on December 1, 1862. In other words, Doc, read original sources. ”
I’ve read those documents, and it appears that if you have read them, you didn’t understand what you read. For example, the message to Congress states very clearly that any departures of negroes will be “with their consent”, i.e. VOLUNTARY. What part of that do you find so difficult to comprehend? He refused to use force to round them up and “send” them anywhere. That was never even under consideration. And of course, Lincoln was not so stupid as to think that they would all politely leave. That’s why, in his last public address before being assassinated, he proposed they be given citizenship and the vote.
flashlight joe: “Nobody ever goes to war to do something nice for someone else.”
I share your cynicism regarding human motives, but the Union soldiers sang, in the Battle Hymn of the Republic, that they wanted to “die to make men free”, not so that they could collect more taxes. Also, Lincoln, in his First Inaugural address, states clearly that slavery, not taxes, is the only substantial issue, viz:
Wow what a dumbass.Your worship of Blacks gushes through even as you pretend to dislike them.Honest Abe?Are you truly in a fantasy world?Lincoln was a Radical Republican and all that went with that.He knew full well what he was unleashing on behalf of his Jewish masters.Lincoln was a closeted homosexual who desired all his life to be part of a successful crooked political system.It was his dream.So the Jews offered him his dream and he sold out all Whites.I don’t believe for a minute that Lincoln would have deviated at all from the agenda which the Radical Republicans forced through after the war.Also you love calling White males pussies and cucks and saying Blacks will”whup”them!I hear Blacks use that word quite a bit so are you channeling you secret heroes?White males did quite well controlling large Blacks physically for centuries.Even now one White cop has very little trouble subduing larger Blacks.What has changed is the Jew controlled system comes down hard on Whites who fight back and that has been ongoing since the 60’s.Most White males mentally opt out of violence because they will suffer under the powerful system.The Jew system cages Whites mentally.I’m disgusted with the lies you tell in your articles about how White males are weak.As for Blacks getting all the great White wombs(your low brow term),I would say that the type of White females most often seen with them are either fat or degenerates.I would not wish on a decent White fellow the specimen of White female that generally picks a Black.Some might be pretty but often whores with no morals are pretty,so what.You are an atheist which disqualifies you totally as a decent White.You are most probably a Jew or a self-hating White who projects your own submissiveness to Blacks onto White men as a whole.I’m betting Jew.And the White men I know don’t fear Blackie at all,we just view them as rabid dogs used by the system against us.Enjoy Hell for eternity White-hating atheist.Christ is Lord.And any thinking White man knows that Judaism has zero to do with followers of Jesus.Judaism was formed with the express purpose to mock Christ Jesus and attempt to confuse God’s children.
Exactly Trinity.Because the Radical Republicans(controlled by the Jews)never intended on sending them back.Their goal was to mongrelize the White race.The Jews hate God’s image and want to wipe it out in His children.If Lincoln had lived nothing would have been done differently.Lincoln was a controlled,closeted homosexual who dreamed since youth of being part of the crooked system and gaining wealth and power.Like all those after him he would do anything he was told by his masters but the Jews always want that extra leverage i.e. deviant sexual lifestyle just in case.
I should add, before this article drops off the main page, that probably the biggest stumbling block to those who want to argue that the American Civil War wasn’t about slavery is the undeniable fact that it was immediately after the war that slavery was abolished and negroes were given citizenship and the vote. Do they really expect us to believe that this timing was a coincidence? Fools who argue the war had nothing to do with slavery but instead was about taxes or states’ rights or caused by Jews (and so on, ad infinitum, for the attempt to shift the blame is endless) can’t plausibly explain that, try as they might. Occasionally one will hear that it was an attempt by the North to punish the South, but what gives the lie to that is that the whole of the voting public, which at that time was composed almost exclusively of Christian white men, imposed negro citizenship and enfranchisement upon itself, not just on the South.
Such an action bears all the hallmarks of, and was, a case of mass insanity brought on by Christianity, with its lunatic idea that the white man and the negro are somehow “brothers” in a fictional family. Whether they know it or not — and most of them do not — today’s whites are suffering endlessly for the religious delusions of their forebears.
Come on.
Even before PC and civil rights stuff, white flight was happening cuz of fear of blacks.
Stop with the denial and copium.
mulga mumblebrain seems to be employing both the argumentum ad naturam fallacy and the is-ought fallacy. Transgenderism and even transexualism exist in nature, though. From Jurassic Park (1993) we learn that there are sex-changing frogs. One such species is Rana Clamitans. There are Transgender lionesses, and one can see an evolutionary reason for this. Let us say that a lioness gives birth to baby lions. The alpha lion dies. If the lioness transes to become a transgender lion, then she can protect her cubs from solitary lions who wish to take over the pride, which often results in killing all the lion cubs. Mmamoiri the transgender lioness. And so, at least in lions and in frogs there are clear evolutionary advantages for both transexualism and transgenderism. However, very few peopleactually believe in evolution and all its implications.
gaedhal: “Transgenderism and even transexualism exist in nature, though. ”
I guess your reply was posted to the wrong thread, and you are replying to this comment of mine:
https://www.unz.com/aanglin/jews-are-going-to-take-your-kids-if-you-dont-turn-them-into-trannies/#comment-6156933
And yes, I agree with you. It’s particularly interesting that in “lower” life forms sex changes happen without change to the DNA. In the Japanese horror film Audition (1999) it’s mentioned that certain species of fish do this. Of course, sex itself is only an evolutionary adaptation; it’s not common to all forms of life. Some reproduce asexually.
Well you atheist Jew troll,I believe you are here to lead Whites away from Jesus and God,and you do this on behalf of your father in Hell.It was not the Protestant Christian Saxon South which loved the Blackies but the Radical Republicans who at the behest of their Jew masters would love a pile of feces.Lincoln was a sexual deviant and money lover which made him the perfect pawn for the Jews as their front man.Also Judah Benjamin(Jew)undermined the Southern war effort from within.And the half-Jew Booth killed the fiend Lincoln not when it would help the South but only when they had lost and would be defenseless to the Radicals revenge scheme.You Jews always blame Christianity because you hate our precious Lord Jesus.We love Him and despise you enemy of the Cross.God made the glorious White race and our loyalty and souls are His,otherwise there is no reason to live.Only an idiot would think that the Northern nigger lovers were anything but foul adherents of the Synagogue of Satan.But you keep trying Jew because your father in Hell is the master of lies whilst our Lord is the bringer of truth and purity.
So much lunacy and gibberish in the below response to you. Someone once said that had there been a good psychiatric ward, in the Middle East, 3,000-1,000 years ago, then none of the Abrahamic Religions would have ever even gotten started. The Jews’ Ancient overlords—the Egyptians, the Babylonians, the Greeks and the Romans—ought to have laced the water with quetiapine, which is an antipsychotic medication. Aron Ra said that sometimes Christians take antipsychotics for an unrelated complaint, but that sometimes, to their horror, their personal relationship with is remedied as collateral damage. They no longer find themselves talking to God/Jesus in their minds, and sometimes they even become atheists.
When Abraham, Saul, Jeebus and Muhammad began to fancy that they were talking to God, a course of antipsychotic medication and a stay in a psychiatric ward ought to have been quickly dispensed to them.
gaedhal: “So much lunacy and gibberish in the below response to you. ”
LOL If our opponents in argument want to make themselves look like raving lunatics, we have no reason to object. They’re just being honest! No one can accuse them of misrepresenting themselves.
gaedhal: “When Abraham, Saul, Jeebus and Muhammad began to fancy that they were talking to God, a course of antipsychotic medication and a stay in a psychiatric ward ought to have been quickly dispensed to them.”
Yes, it’s astounding to think that two thousand years of human history might have been prevented with just a few thorazine pills, perhaps a little electroshock, and maybe a lobotomy or two! Such are the wonders of modern medicine.
You have a point, but the essential raw material of cotton also was produced in abundance. One of the characteristics of the political left is that it rejects all thought that takes a jaundiced view of human nature an opposed to seeing evil as confined to certain defined classes of people. The Bible with its emphasis on the sinful nature of man is one case of a work which they reject. Or, since you brought him up, Schopenauer.
I was thinking just the other day that must be some coterie of mature women who hold much the same view of young women that Schopenauer did, and who see them as a group and a force that needs to be molded and kept under control, not as the greatest of all beings.
Modern metropolitanist society gives great power to young women who willing to become an adventuress. The reason why is pretty obvious. Sharp young women are the principal source of good sex in this world. One with a little caliber adds social prestige to the mix.
A society which harbored more doubts about the inherent character of human nature would not elevate vices into virtues.