Baseball hitters are reasonably scared of being hit by an inside pitch. Only one major league baseball player has been directly killed by being hit with a hardball pitch, Ray Chapman in 1920, but many, such as Tony Conigliaro, have been badly hurt.
Pitchers use hitters’ fear to gain an advantage over them. For example, Bob Gibson looked terrifyingly mean on the mound, which meant that hitters would be reluctant to crowd the plate for fear of being hit, so they had a harder time putting the sweet spot of the bat on a pitch on the outside edge of the plate.
Can we quantify how nasty or nice pitchers are? We have Hit By Pitch statistics for pitchers. The problem, though, is that there are two main reasons pitchers hit a lot of batsmen: they intentionally throw inside or they are just wild in general.
We can get a better sense of intentional nastiness by dividing HBP by two measures of wildness: Wild Pitches and Bases on Balls. (We have data on intentional bases on balls from 1928 onward, but I didn’t bother subtracting that.)
For example, fastballer Nolan Ryan hit a lot of batters, but not all that many relative to how many he walked or how many wild pitches he threw. In contrast, Greg Maddux didn’t hit all that many batters, but more than you’d expect considering his otherwise superb control.
Here are all Hall of Fame pitchers (excluding 19th Century, Negro Leagues, and new electee C.C. Sabathaia-congratulations) ranked from Nastiest to Nicest by the sum of their Combined rankings on HBP/WP and HBP/BB:
Nasty to Nice Rank | Name | Combined Rank | Rank HBP/WP | Rank HBP/BB | From | To | HBP/9 | WP/9 | BB/9 | HBP/WP | HBP/BB |
1 | Joe McGinnity | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1899 | 1908 | 0.47 | 0.08 | 2.12 | 5.97 | 0.22 |
2 | Pedro Martinez | 7 | 5 | 2 | 1992 | 2009 | 0.45 | 0.20 | 2.42 | 2.27 | 0.19 |
3 | Mariano Rivera | 8 | 2 | 6 | 1995 | 2013 | 0.32 | 0.09 | 2.01 | 3.54 | 0.16 |
4 | Jim Bunning | 10 | 3 | 7 | 1955 | 1971 | 0.38 | 0.11 | 2.39 | 3.40 | 0.16 |
5 | Eddie Plank | 11 | 7 | 4 | 1901 | 1917 | 0.38 | 0.18 | 2.15 | 2.16 | 0.18 |
6 | Don Drysdale | 15 | 12 | 3 | 1956 | 1969 | 0.40 | 0.22 | 2.24 | 1.88 | 0.18 |
7 | Addie Joss | 17 | 9 | 8 | 1902 | 1910 | 0.22 | 0.11 | 1.41 | 2.07 | 0.16 |
8 | Jack Chesbro | 19 | 14 | 5 | 1899 | 1909 | 0.35 | 0.19 | 2.14 | 1.82 | 0.16 |
9 | Dennis Eckersley | 22 | 4 | 18 | 1975 | 1998 | 0.21 | 0.08 | 2.02 | 2.68 | 0.10 |
10 | Greg Maddux | 23 | 11 | 12 | 1986 | 2008 | 0.25 | 0.13 | 1.80 | 1.96 | 0.14 |
11 | Dazzy Vance | 27 | 8 | 19 | 1915 | 1935 | 0.23 | 0.11 | 2.55 | 2.08 | 0.09 |
12 | Rube Waddell | 29 | 18 | 11 | 1897 | 1910 | 0.35 | 0.22 | 2.44 | 1.55 | 0.14 |
13 | Vic Willis | 30 | 16 | 14 | 1898 | 1910 | 0.35 | 0.21 | 2.73 | 1.66 | 0.13 |
14 | Randy Johnson | 30 | 15 | 15 | 1988 | 2009 | 0.41 | 0.24 | 3.26 | 1.74 | 0.13 |
15 | Walter Johnson | 31 | 22 | 9 | 1907 | 1927 | 0.31 | 0.23 | 2.07 | 1.33 | 0.15 |
16 | Red Faber | 31 | 10 | 21 | 1914 | 1933 | 0.23 | 0.11 | 2.67 | 1.98 | 0.08 |
17 | Roy Halladay | 32 | 19 | 13 | 1998 | 2013 | 0.27 | 0.18 | 1.94 | 1.45 | 0.14 |
18 | Charles Bender | 33 | 23 | 10 | 1903 | 1925 | 0.30 | 0.24 | 2.12 | 1.29 | 0.14 |
19 | Bert Blyleven | 36 | 20 | 16 | 1970 | 1992 | 0.28 | 0.21 | 2.39 | 1.36 | 0.12 |
20 | Grover Alexander | 43 | 13 | 30 | 1911 | 1930 | 0.12 | 0.07 | 1.65 | 1.84 | 0.07 |
21 | Fergie Jenkins | 44 | 21 | 23 | 1965 | 1983 | 0.17 | 0.12 | 1.99 | 1.35 | 0.08 |
22 | Dizzy Dean | 46 | 6 | 40 | 1930 | 1947 | 0.12 | 0.05 | 2.07 | 2.25 | 0.06 |
23 | Mordecai Brown | 51 | 31 | 20 | 1903 | 1916 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 1.91 | 1.00 | 0.09 |
24 | Jim Kaat | 52 | 35 | 17 | 1959 | 1983 | 0.24 | 0.25 | 2.15 | 0.95 | 0.11 |
25 | Burleigh Grimes | 55 | 28 | 27 | 1916 | 1934 | 0.22 | 0.20 | 2.79 | 1.10 | 0.08 |
26 | Robin Roberts | 56 | 17 | 39 | 1948 | 1966 | 0.10 | 0.06 | 1.73 | 1.64 | 0.06 |
27 | Rollie Fingers | 59 | 34 | 25 | 1968 | 1985 | 0.21 | 0.21 | 2.60 | 0.98 | 0.08 |
28 | Babe Ruth | 62 | 27 | 35 | 1914 | 1935 | 0.21 | 0.18 | 3.25 | 1.16 | 0.07 |
29 | Carl Hubbell | 63 | 32 | 31 | 1928 | 1943 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 1.82 | 1.00 | 0.07 |
30 | Bob Gibson | 65 | 36 | 29 | 1959 | 1975 | 0.24 | 0.25 | 3.10 | 0.94 | 0.08 |
31 | Jesse Haines | 65 | 29 | 36 | 1918 | 1937 | 0.16 | 0.15 | 2.44 | 1.04 | 0.07 |
32 | Mike Mussina | 68 | 40 | 28 | 1991 | 2008 | 0.15 | 0.18 | 1.98 | 0.85 | 0.08 |
33 | Ed Walsh | 69 | 47 | 22 | 1904 | 1917 | 0.16 | 0.23 | 1.87 | 0.68 | 0.08 |
34 | Hoyt Wilhelm | 70 | 46 | 24 | 1952 | 1972 | 0.25 | 0.36 | 3.11 | 0.69 | 0.08 |
35 | Waite Hoyt | 71 | 25 | 46 | 1918 | 1938 | 0.12 | 0.09 | 2.40 | 1.26 | 0.05 |
36 | Gaylord Perry | 74 | 48 | 26 | 1962 | 1983 | 0.18 | 0.27 | 2.32 | 0.68 | 0.08 |
37 | Eppa Rixey | 75 | 43 | 32 | 1912 | 1933 | 0.15 | 0.19 | 2.17 | 0.78 | 0.07 |
38 | Red Ruffing | 77 | 24 | 53 | 1924 | 1947 | 0.12 | 0.10 | 3.19 | 1.26 | 0.04 |
39 | Catfish Hunter | 78 | 33 | 45 | 1965 | 1979 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 2.49 | 1.00 | 0.05 |
40 | Tom Glavine | 79 | 30 | 49 | 1987 | 2008 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 3.06 | 1.02 | 0.04 |
41 | Rich Gossage | 81 | 44 | 37 | 1972 | 1994 | 0.23 | 0.31 | 3.64 | 0.75 | 0.06 |
42 | Early Wynn | 81 | 26 | 55 | 1939 | 1963 | 0.13 | 0.10 | 3.50 | 1.25 | 0.04 |
43 | Don Sutton | 83 | 45 | 38 | 1966 | 1988 | 0.14 | 0.19 | 2.29 | 0.73 | 0.06 |
44 | Bob Lemon | 84 | 37 | 47 | 1941 | 1958 | 0.18 | 0.20 | 3.95 | 0.90 | 0.05 |
45 | Juan Marichal | 85 | 42 | 43 | 1960 | 1975 | 0.10 | 0.13 | 1.82 | 0.78 | 0.06 |
46 | Phil Niekro | 87 | 53 | 34 | 1964 | 1987 | 0.20 | 0.38 | 3.01 | 0.54 | 0.07 |
47 | Christy Mathewson | 88 | 55 | 33 | 1900 | 1916 | 0.11 | 0.22 | 1.59 | 0.51 | 0.07 |
48 | Nolan Ryan | 91 | 50 | 41 | 1966 | 1993 | 0.26 | 0.46 | 4.67 | 0.57 | 0.06 |
49 | Tom Seaver | 93 | 49 | 44 | 1967 | 1986 | 0.14 | 0.24 | 2.62 | 0.60 | 0.05 |
50 | Stan Coveleski | 93 | 39 | 54 | 1912 | 1928 | 0.09 | 0.10 | 2.34 | 0.86 | 0.04 |
51 | Bob Feller | 95 | 38 | 57 | 1936 | 1956 | 0.14 | 0.16 | 4.15 | 0.87 | 0.03 |
52 | Lefty Grove | 97 | 41 | 56 | 1925 | 1941 | 0.10 | 0.12 | 2.71 | 0.82 | 0.04 |
53 | John Smoltz | 101 | 59 | 42 | 1988 | 2009 | 0.15 | 0.38 | 2.62 | 0.39 | 0.06 |
54 | Herb Pennock | 104 | 52 | 52 | 1912 | 1934 | 0.09 | 0.16 | 2.31 | 0.55 | 0.04 |
55 | Rube Marquard | 105 | 57 | 48 | 1908 | 1925 | 0.11 | 0.22 | 2.34 | 0.48 | 0.05 |
56 | Bruce Sutter | 111 | 61 | 50 | 1976 | 1988 | 0.11 | 0.32 | 2.67 | 0.35 | 0.04 |
57 | Warren Spahn | 113 | 54 | 59 | 1942 | 1965 | 0.07 | 0.14 | 2.46 | 0.52 | 0.03 |
58 | Ted Lyons | 113 | 51 | 62 | 1923 | 1946 | 0.07 | 0.12 | 2.42 | 0.56 | 0.03 |
59 | Jack Morris | 115 | 64 | 51 | 1977 | 1994 | 0.14 | 0.48 | 3.27 | 0.28 | 0.04 |
60 | Jim Palmer | 118 | 58 | 60 | 1965 | 1984 | 0.09 | 0.19 | 2.99 | 0.45 | 0.03 |
61 | Lefty Gomez | 122 | 56 | 66 | 1930 | 1943 | 0.07 | 0.14 | 3.94 | 0.49 | 0.02 |
62 | Whitey Ford | 123 | 60 | 63 | 1950 | 1967 | 0.08 | 0.21 | 3.08 | 0.37 | 0.03 |
63 | Steve Carlton | 124 | 63 | 61 | 1965 | 1988 | 0.09 | 0.32 | 3.16 | 0.29 | 0.03 |
64 | Trevor Hoffman | 125 | 67 | 58 | 1993 | 2010 | 0.07 | 0.40 | 2.54 | 0.18 | 0.03 |
65 | Hal Newhouser | 129 | 62 | 67 | 1939 | 1955 | 0.06 | 0.20 | 3.76 | 0.29 | 0.02 |
66 | Sandy Koufax | 130 | 66 | 64 | 1955 | 1966 | 0.07 | 0.34 | 3.16 | 0.21 | 0.02 |
67 | Lee Smith | 130 | 65 | 65 | 1980 | 1997 | 0.07 | 0.33 | 3.39 | 0.21 | 0.02 |
The Nastiest is Dead Ball Era pitcher Iron Man Joe McGinnity, while tied for Nicest are Sandy Koufax and Lee Smith.
After McGinnity come two much admired Millennium-era pitchers, Pedro Martinez and Mariano Rivera. Martinez, who had superb command of his pitches, said, “When I hit a batter, it was 90% intentional.”
Fourth nastiest was three-term U.S. Senator Jim Bunning (R-KY).
Some of the rankings are due to when pitchers pitched. Dead Ball Era pitchers hit a lot of batters, but after Chapman’s death in 1920, baseball culture changed and pitchers chose to throw inside a lot less. (One reason for the huge offensive statistics seen between the wars was that pitchers were voluntarily eschewing to a greater extent their most feared weapon.)
Sal “The Barber” Maglie reintroduced inside pitching in the 1950s. And the batting helmet was introduced in 1955 and much later finally became fairly effective. More batter’s armor was introduced with time. And umpires became quicker to eject pitchers who seemed to be retaliating.
Despite his fearsome reputation, Bob Gibson ranks in the middle of the pack, #30 out of 67.
It’s interesting to compare teammates pitching in the same years in the same ballpark. One apples-to-apples comparison is Dodger teammates Don Drysdale (#6 Nastiest) and Sandy Koufax (tied for Nicest). As a rookie, Drysdale had a locker next to Maglie and listened carefully to his advice.
Koufax, in contrast, had a boyish conception of himself as the white-hatted hero of a cowboy TV show. Koufax intentionally hit Lou Brock in 1965 in what his biographer said was the only time he ever threw at a batter. In Koufax’s final season, 1966, he went 27-9 over 323 innings without hitting a single batter.
The Atlanta Braves around the Millennium had the greatest pitching staff over a long time, with three Hall of Fame starters: Greg Maddux (#10), Tom Glavine (#40), and John Smoltz (#53).
There doesn’t seem to be much relationship between popularity and position on the Nasty/Nice scale. Carl Mays might have made the Hall of Fame if he hadn’t killed Chapman and had a number of other controversies. Otherwise, not really …
Not in the Hall, but Al Hrabosky had quite the reputation. However, checking the stats, he hit only 13 batters in 722 innings. Victor Zambrano of TB/NYM hit 63 in 706. He hit 51 in a 3 season span.
I assume modern, over 6′ batters don’t need to get as close to the plate–but they’re also bigger targets with more inertia.
Pitchers are very possessive of the plate. They believe that it belongs to them, not to the batter. If a batter is leaning over the plate, he is invading the pitcher’s territory and trying to shrink the strike zone. So the batter is a legitimate target, to the pitcher’s mind. Bob Gibson said that he usually wasn’t trying to hit the batters he plunked; it’s just that he didn’t care if they got plunked or not. He was just protecting his strike zone.
“… tied for Nicest are Sandy Koufax and Lee Smith.”
Lee was listed at 6’5″ 220 lbs; size matters. Also mattering but unfortunately unavailable are pitch speeds from the 20th century — I surmise that I’d prefer getting plunked by a Niekro knuckleball than by anything Smith threw. Koufax broke Lou Brock’s shoulder blade with that single intentional beaning, so credit both to Koufax for yet another exemplar of his on-mound efficiency, and to Brock for recovering to build his incredibly ballsy .391 World Series batting average over close to 100 WS plate appearances.
This discussion always evokes surprise over how few hitters Bob Gibson HBP’d. Gibson’s surliness was primarily made manifest through his refusal to be friendly with opposing hitters during spring training games, All-Star games, and the like — he dreaded giving away any edge. He used to love talking about how then-Cardinal-previous-Giant Orlando Cepeda would go to dinner with Giant great Juan Marichal to open every STL-SF series … and then fatten his batting average upon facing Marichal that series.
Bob Gibson seems like the beau ideal of pitchers: he talked a brutal game but didn’t actually bean that many hitters.
Always fun to read these posts and dig a little further into the backstories. The sound was so loud, Mays thought it hit Chapman’s bat and threw him out at first. Reminded me of my last softball game playing third base. I misplayed a ball and it hit me in the face and flew 40 feet on the air and was caught for an out. It chipped two BACK teeth but no broken cheekbone which was good. We didn’t have enough players and I couldn’t leave game so I moved to right field. I was fairly distraught but didn’t want to forfeit. Anyway, the NEXT batter hit a screamer right at me in right field!! I caught it but realized this wasn’t my sport…which I should’ve realized twenty years earlier. Baseball even softball takes a specific type of courage/coolness that not many people have. RIP Roy Chapman – he was a good man whose last words exonerated Mays.
“Greg Maddux didn’t hit all that many batters, but more than you’d expect considering his otherwise superb control.”
A great story about Maddox was during his first full season with the Cubs. He was struggling and was warned that if he didn’t get a win in his next start he’d be sent down. They were playing the Padres and were winning when one of their pitchers hit Shawn Dunston or Andre Dawson sometime in the middle of the game, resulting in benches clearing and warnings. Knowing he’d get ejected and possibly lose the opportunity to get the win (and certainly get sent down), he retaliated anyway and hit one of the Padres players the next inning. He was sent down, but not right away, and was brought back up after only a couple starts in the minors.
I’d guess Maddux probably only hit batters when he wanted to.
Love the story about when McCarver came to the mound to discuss pitch selection with Gibson and Gibson told him to go back to the plate (“what do you know about pitching?”).
Wow, this is coincidental.
I live in the Boston area. The other day I was chatting with plumber (middle-aged white working-class guy) doing some work on our water heater system and we talked about athletes and celebs we’ve run into out in public here in the Boston area. Among the people he mentioned meeting was a Pedro Martinez whom he said was the nicest guy. Allowed him to take a selfie and treated like a friend he hadn’t seen in a while.
I think some adjustment needs to be made for pitch location, though it seems like a lot of work. One should distinguish between ‘bottom half of the zone’ pitchers like Rivera who don’t really scare anyone and the ‘upper half of the zone’, high heat pitchers who do.
I looked for Roger Clemens on the list, and then realized that it was limited to Hall of Fame members.
Don’t know about hit batsman but Juan Marachial hitting Dodger catcher John Rosenboro in the head wit a baseball bat shoots him to numero uno. Another wild man was Cincy reliever Pedro Borbon, must be something about Dominicans. And who can forget the classic Robin Ventura vs. Nolan Ryan slobberknocker. The much younger Ventura charges the mound only to be lassoed in a headlock by the balding aged Ryan who repeatedly fisted Robin’s head in one of baseball’s more comical brawls.
Having faced quite a few 90mph+ pitchers myself, I can tell you the scariest pitchers aren’t the hard throwers with great control but rather the ones who are wild. There’s nothing worse than stepping into the batters box against a wild flamethrower, because you have no idea where the next pitch is going and neither does he… these guys don’t typically get anywhere close to the HOF though.
-Rooster
Jim Bunning was known to have an abrasive personality off the field as well. I liked him as a Senator.
I wonder how the modern trend of batters wearing armor on the sides of their bodies which face the mound will work out with HBP numbers. Will it encourage HBPs on the theory that someone wearing armor and crowding the plate knows what he is doing? Or will it discourage HBPs because they’re not effective?
It does seem that even with the batting armor, batters’ broken wrists and hands following HBPs are trending upward. But perhaps I’m just noticing it more because it affected more notable players.
Randy Johnson was justly feared for his erratic speed. And with his gangling build he looked every inch of his reported height.
Funny how Pedro’s HBP went up after going to the American League. It’s weird how bad behavior increases when there are no consequences! The AL was like the Floyd effect of professional sports.
Yuck. If I were hit with a Burleigh Grimes pitch, I’d head straight for the shower. Then get a shot or two.
There are five Puerto Ricans in the HOF, none a pitcher. Ivan Rodriguez had a notable arm, but from the other end of the battery. Puerto Rico and arms are in the news today because AOC slammed the ADL for excusing Elon’s NSDAP salute. But even the ADL has its limits. Musk’s “salute” is about as “Nazi” as ADL’s own siding with Bakke way back when.
She called beating the CSA and the NSDAP our “foundational” events, which is ridiculous. Beating the British– back when we were British– is our foundation. She should take Acela to Lexington or Independence Hall sometime.
But as a peacemaking gesture, for atonement Trump should issue an EO granting the “floating island of garbage” her independence.
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5097676-elon-musk-defended-salute-criticism/
OK, now Steve’s just fucking with us.
The world’s greatest musical Hey-I’m-Messing-With-You…..
Video Link
How many pitchers with only 165 wins are in the hall of fame? Why is Koufax there? If Koufax is in, David Cone, 194 wins, should be a shoe-in. Something strange there.
Nice touch to put George H. “Babe” Ruth in there as a pitcher. Although he was not elected to the Hall of Fame as a pitcher, he is the only ballplayer in the history of the game who is provably of Hall of Fame caliber as both a pitcher and a hitter. The word is “provably”, and that is based on actual performance on the baseball field, not speculation. Ruth can be projected to have had 350 to 400 career win potential as a pitcher.
Barring injury, and his career as a position player proved his durability, he would have been well into the 200s in career wins by the age of 30.
Because he was the nicest pitcher of all time.
Mike “Moose” Mussina will always be an Oriole.
Everyone who knew Don Drysdale considered him a heckuva nice guy.
Years after he retired, an interviewer asked Drysdale about that apparent contradiction. “Don, how could a nice guy like you try to bean Hank Aaron or Willie Mays.” Don started talking with a smile, but as he talked, his whole demeanor changed. “Well, you have to remember that we didn’t make big money in those days. We really wanted that World Series check. Some of us were counting on it to pay the mortgage or to put our kids through college. So, here comes Hank Aaron. He’s trying to beat me. He’s trying to keep me out of the World Series. That son of a bitch wants to steal my money.”
I swear, Drysdale was in his late 40s by then, but he made himself angry enough to bean Aaron on the spot.
Don Newcombe was a mean SOB who legend has it sued a teammate for dumping champagne on him while celebrating the Dodgers winning the National League pennant.
Early Wynn was another cantankerous pitcher who while pitching batting practice to his son knocked him down after the kid drove a couple balls over the centerfold fence.
The stories are probably hyperbole but illustrate the real mean natured character of both pitchers.
The new age players may be better, but they definitely are less entertaining.
Sabbathia was a beast. recall when he was with the Yankees, had a bonus for innings pitched that he was very close to achieving in his last start vs. the Rays. But when a Yankee was beaned by a Rays pitcher, Sabbathia had no problem hitting a Ray batter next inning knowing it could cost him achieving the benchmark bonus, upon his ejection. Yankees were rumored to have paid the bonus anyway.
It’s not really fair to lump relievers and starters together in these categories. Relievers are usually pitching in situations where they can’t afford to put a guy on just to intimidate people.
One guy who should be mentioned in the Greg Maddux class of picking your spot to make a statement is Lew Burdette, a very good pitcher for the Milwaukee Braves in the ’50s, though not quite a HOFer. Like Maddux, he was noted for outstanding control, with 1.8BB/9 during his career. On your combined rankings, he would be tied at 23 with Maddux. He didn’t throw many wild pitches (especially for a spitballer), ranking 19th in wp/bb. But his hbp/bb was a whopping 2.43, which would place him 4th on the list. Among his more memorable incidents were breaking Dick Groat’s wrist with a pitch during the Pirate’s 1960 pennant stretch run, and a notable fight with Roy Campanella (after knocking him down twice, Burdette yelled “Get up and hit, Ni**er”, whereupon Campanella charged the mound). He was also noted for bench jockeying, being particularly fond of baiting St. Jackie Robinson, although he was an equal-opportunity insulter. Burdette didn’t throw very hard, and part of his game was pissing off opposing hitters so they would try to clobber his junk and end up hitting grounders to short.
Burdette was about as hillbilly as you can get, making J.D. Vance look like Cole Porter. His hometown of Nitro, WV was literally founded as an explosives factory, and basically spent most of it’s existence as an American Viscose Chemical company town. His on-field vocabulary was laced with various racial and ethnic slurs and uncomplimentary terms. However, Hank Aaron in his autobiography stated that whenever opposing pitchers threw at him or any of the other Braves black stars, Burdette immediately put a stop to it by knocking down the other teams big hitters. And in Boys of Summer, Campanella said that Burdette was practically the only opposing player to visit him in the hospital after his accident.
Burdette’s big moment, of course, was the 3 victories (2 of them shutouts) in the 1957 World Series, won by the Braves. The late ’50s Braves were one of the all time great underachieving teams of all time, with three top-tier HOFers (Aaron, Mathews, Spahn). Spahn, Burdette and Bob Buhl formed one of the great Big 3 starting combos ever. However, they only had 2 pennants and 1 WS to show for it (which still puts them ahead of the early ’60s Giants, who had Mays, Cepeda, Marichal, Gaylord Perry and the Alou brothers on the team all at the same time, and only won 1 pennant and 0 WS).
Interesting point. The data for this probably exists only for the last 5-10 years or so, whenever Statcast became a thing. Pretty sure that now, pitch location data is collected for every pitch.
Would almost certainly be impossible any earlier than the 1970s or 80s, I’m not sure when video of every game first became available.
So WHY did Koufax bean Brock?
It’s a legitimate point. On the other hand, Koufax’s star burned extremely bright over roughly a five-year period, and he was on a World Series winner. He had four no-hitters, including a perfect game. And he pitched in a huge market. In any event, not many pitchers go 27-9 in their final season. Too bad they had not yet invented Tommy John surgery in 1966.
LOL :
https://www.newsweek.com/elon-musk-controversial-salute-image-beamed-tesla-factory-berlin-2019279
Anna is correct:
You’ve been phoning it in for weeks, Sailer, and with everything going on these days, the best you can come up with is this lame crap about pitchers? You really have become irrelevant.
Henceforth, all prospective employees of Tesla will be required to complete the following exam:
1. The ___ cries out in pain as he strikes you.
A. French Canadian
B. Philadelphian
C. Jew
2. The ___ cries out in disgust as he s**ts on you.
A. Cuban
B. Kardashian
C. Jeet
3. Elon Musk is ___.
A. Awesome
B. Amazing
C. Autistic
Video Link
I wonder what happens if you just search for the frequency over the years of the term “beanball” or “headhunter.” My guess is that you would find that there used to be more of that. Now there is more showboating. (And more wearing ostentatious jewelery.)
They say hitting a baseball is the hardest thing to do in professional sports. I don’t doubt that is true. What no one ever mentions though is that what is so hard about hitting a baseball is that you don’t know where the ball is going to be. To that point I would argue that the gap between C Ball, where they use pitching machines that put the ball in the same place everytime, and A Ball, where the batter faces real pitchers for the first time, is actually greater than the gap between Tee Ball and C Ball.
By the way, Stan Evans, who was, according to my father, something like the funniest man who wrote for a living to never write humorously, once made a joke about George F. Will, who, of course, annually or periodically writes his solemn column about the national pastime: “I’m thinking about writing a colmn about baseball. A column about baseball as a metaphor. Baseball as a metaphor… for softball. Think of it: you’ve got the field: and the field. You’ve got the players: and the players. Etc.
Koufax was 165-87, won the pitcher’s version of the triple crown three times, won Cy Young Award three times, was a 7 time all star in a career in a career that only lasted from 1956-1966. Koufax also posted a career ERA of 2.76. Cone is not even in the same league. There are people who questioned the choice of Mussina even, who had 76 more wins than Cone. The high ERA of Mussina and Cone can be permissible due to the era they played in but Cone doesn’t deserve the nod imo, while Mussina certainly did.
Musk’s so-called Nazi salute is done often by opera singers at the end of a performance. They touch their heart and then extend their arm out towards the audience.
They lie to us, we know they’re lying, they know we know they’re lying, but they keep lying to us,
Interesting about Pedro Martinez: he was only 5’9″ and began his career in the NL in the 90s, when pitchers were still batting (hurts to say that last part now). And yet he was still known as a headhunter then.
So he was risking (1) retaliation during his own at bats; and (2) having some 1990s 6’4″ ‘roided-up monstrosity charging the mound at light speed to spear tackle him when he was just a hotshot young nobody.
And yet Pedro hit people anyway. And I believe his rate didn’t go up when he got to the AL and was a protected star. Shows you what kind of guy he was right out of the gate.
There are some guys who are in the Hall of Fame, and my reaction is ‘what’s so great about this guy?’ That’s not my reaction with Koufax:
The answer is the universal specific; Jewish privilege, of course. If ‘Cone’ were ‘Coen’ he would have been a unanimous selection.
OT — Watch a Haitian get deported.
Video Link
OT — The outcome of the AI experiment may be the clarification that Chinese are objectively superior to pajeets. The claims at this link are not only amazing but portentious for our desperately wrecked military and high technology research fields; if this is true, it would force action from Trump, and hopefully generate much-needed reforms.
https://www.teamblind.com/post/Meta-genai-org-in-panic-mode-KccnF41n
In the top of the 3rd Eric Show hit Andre Dawson, the Maddux retaliated by hitting Benito Santiago in the bottom the 3rd. The Cub manager at the time was Gene Michael while the pitching coach was Herm Starrette. After the game Maddux had an ERA of 4.46 but he wasn’t sent down until his ERA ballooned to 5.47. Down in AAA Iowa Maddux made 4 starts and regained his form going 3-0 with a 0.98 ERA before rejoining the Cubs in September. While he went 0-3 after that he became Greg Maddux the following year as the Cubs left the NL East basement (and won the division the year after that)
The late Bob Uecker once went to visit Gibson on the mound when the latter snarled at the former “What the hell do you want?” Uecker replied that he was just taking a stroll to talk to Curt Flood in center field 🤣
As an aside, Uecker and Gibson were teammates for two years on the Cardinals: 1964 and 1965. Considering the Cardinals regular catcher then was Tim McCarver, does anyone want to guess what Gibson’s record was with Uecker as his catcher?
Great story.
460 in a day and a half?
Lessee…that comes to about one out of every forty thousand.
Assuming we seal the border, we should have this wrapped up in…two hundred years!
Of course, that’s if there’s no natural increase in the population.
I’ve never seen anybody more knowledgeable look into this, but as a pitcher, Ruth’s rate of striking out batters per 9 innings declined from about 1915 onward. He was still quite successful, but perhaps he got serious about his hitting because he was aware that his arm was fading?
On the other hand, my impression is that with the passage of time, pitching has come to be more valued than hitting.
If Ruth came up now, maybe he’d just have kept pitching?
Carlos Zambrano was the meanest, at least to his catchers.
In a game from around 1992 that you can find on YT, Ralph Kiner said he was once on the most exclusive golf course in Palm Springs with Drysdale, and said to him, “Don, if we were playing today we could afford to live here.”
True; it was started by Wagnerians at Bayreuth.
The Burdette origin story is even better. He was Yankee property, pitching for the San Francisco Seals in 1951. A Hollywood Stars player, after striking out, went back to the bench and told the manager, “that guy has the best spitter I’ve ever seen.” The manager was friends with Braves owner Lou Perini and passed on the news. When the Yankees wanted Johnny Sain from the Braves for the stretch run, the Braves said we’ll take Burdette.
Cone also pitched a perfect game for the Yankees, fwiw. Koufax won an MVP, Three Cy Youngs, and 3 pitching Triple Crowns (Ks, ERA, and Wins). Cone won 1 Cy Young.
Dock Ellis, throwing his no-hitter … sky-high on LSD … no idea whether the batter was left-handed or right-handed …
Ahh – that explains the HOF induction of Dizzy Deanowitz.
Video Link
In the AL he didn’t have to worry about batting and getting thrown at. He could be more proactive protecting the inside corner.
Sportswriters biases? SK has slightly better postseason numbers in less appearances, but DC was great in playoffs, as well. SK has 30 less wins, but in 100 less starts. If Koufax never existed does Cone deserve enshrinement?
Follow-up to this: possible corroboration. Anon claimed,
Video Link
Video Link
Video Link
Longevity should count for something. He had some great years, but so did a lot of players. Luis Tiant had 229 wins, Tommy John had 288, Mickey Lolich had 217, hell, Denny McLain pitched for 10 years and went 131-91 and was the last man to win over 30 games, something Koufax couldn’t do, even on those great Dodgers teams. More to it, I think.
The year Koufax won the MVP Hank Aaron hit 44 HRs and batted .319. Sandy won 25 games, but a lot of pitchers have won 25 and not been gifted an mvp. Weird, right? He won all 3 of his Cy Youngs unanimously, all 3, only 2 other pitchers have ever been given the Cy Young unanimously. I don’t know, smells fishy to me.
Imagine what AI might do with that sentence…
Google isn’t much help.
Duckduckgo is slightly better.
Imagine a white man writing this in today’s Britain:
If Axel Rudakubana were a white teen who had killed three girls of ethnic origin – there would be no debate
And then the Hapless Cubs traded him rio ATL.
Thanks Cubs!!!
I think it was George Sisler (correct me, perhaps Rogers Hornsby?) that said “Ruth made a mistake becoming an everyday player, as he was sure to have a 20 year career as a pitcher.”
Thanks for fleshing that out. I guess the only way I could explain it is that (at least as far as I remember it) Koufax was pretty much regarded as the BEST pitcher in baseball during that five-year period, whereas Cone was just very good.
(Chuckle). You beat me to it!
Not sure about that at all. Strikeout totals could be affected by how his catcher called his pitches, by how his manager told him to pitch, how the batters approached hitting against him, what teams he came up against in the rotation, by his own inherent level of effectivness, and even dumb luck.
Through 1917, his last season as a full-time pitcher, he had 67 career wins at the age of 22. No one knows what he would have done if he had continued as a full time pitcher, but win totals were high in that era for top pitchers. If he had averaged only 18 wins over the next ten years, he would have had 247 career wins at the age of 32. Knowing that he did have durability, you have to project him as at least a marginal Hall of Famer as a pitcher, barring an arm injury.
I have always enjoyed it that Steve intersperses his political blog posts with other posts about topics like baseball, Bob Dylan or David Lynch. Sometimes you just want to get away from politics and think about something else.
I frequently watched the Tonight show with Johnny Carson. While Johnny was likely a liberal, he wanted a broad audience and did not evince strong hostility to the right and his show was entertainment oriented. All the late night talk show hosts are now noticeably unfunny leftists hostile to Republicans except for Gutfeld, whose show is funny but also political.
It used to be sports figures did not heavily push their political beliefs either. I first saw a shift when Michael Jordan was criticized for telling people to buy his sneakers instead of who to vote for.
Let us not forget the 196o’s Twins; one of the great underachieving teams of all time. A team with people like Camilo Pascual, Jim Kaat, Harmon Killebrew, Earl Battey, Tony Oliva Rod Carew, among others only managed to win one pennant and two division titles; while winning only three postseason games – oh and losing the pennant on the last day in 1967…
OT, but just out of curiosity…
What do you think will really be going through Joe Biden’s mind, during his first 30 seconds in Hell? You know, the part when he finally realizes that Hell is actually real, and he’s actually in it, forever, and that guess what, there are no presidential pardons in Hell?
You’re there forever, Joe. Screaming and screaming, and then screaming some more, and then screaming and screaming for yet another 20 seconds, pleading for mercy and getting none, mocked and laughed at by the demons sent to guard and torment you, and then swallowing yet another throat-full and lung-full of stinking, boiling, flaming human shit, and then screaming again, and then more screaming, and no escape. Ever.
Enjoy. You’ll deserve every second of it.
Joe Biden. Hell awaits you.
Pay for his substack!
Are you a poor???
Regarding among MLB’s nastiest pitchers, where is Dock Ellis? Don’t see his name on the list.
“That kid throws GASSSSS!!!” – Joe Morgan commenting on Billy Wagner
Koufax at his 1963-1966 peak was as heroic as any pitcher ever, going an average of 24-7, winning three league championships and two World Series.
Compare Koufax to his teammate Drysdale. Drysdale lost a lot of 4-3 and 3-2 games, going 18-15 over those same years. Drysdale was a Hall of Fame pitcher, but he wasn’t a miracle worker with the Dodgers’ unimpressive offense. Koufax, in contrast, specialized in winning 1-0 games. E.g., in the heart of the 1965 pennant race when the Cubs held the Dodgers to one hit and one run, Koufax threw a perfect game with 14 strikeouts.
For the 7th game of the 1965 World Series, Hall of Fame manager Walter Alston had his choice of Drysdale on his normal 3 days rest or Koufax on 2 days rest. He went with Koufax, who immediately found out his arm couldn’t break off a curve ball that day. So he just threw fastballs and won 2-0 on three hits.
Babe Ruth was a great American because he didn’t listen to what other people told him he should do.
“Babe Ruth was a great American because he didn’t listen to what other people told him he should do.”
“I ran away from home at 16, lied about my age, and joined the Marines, because everybody told me not to.”
— my uncle, who later personally designed and built half of Agoura Hills and Thousand Oaks
“We are who we pretend to be; so we had better be very careful about who and what we pretend to be.”
— Kurt Vonnegut Jr., preface to “Mother Night”
Were the 1963-1966 Dodgers, who won 3 National League pennants in 4 years in a 10 team league, all that great other than Sandy Koufax? On the 1965 Dodgers, on which Koufax went 26-8, the top three home run hitters were rookie Jim Lefebvre with 12, journeyman Lou Johnson with 12, and pitcher Don Drysdale with 7.
David Cone was a great pitcher whose career stats are marginally above the Hall of Fame benchmark of 60 Wins Above Replacement. Keeping some worthy guys out of the baseball Hall of Fame is why baseball Hall of Fame arguments are more interesting than NFL Hall of Fame arguments, where they let in most of the worthy candidates.
Who was more obviously Jewish than Dizzy Dean?
They used to post salaries on Baseball Reference, but they stopped, so I can’t tell if they got worried they were wrong or not. But if they were accurate, they were hilarious: e.g., an aging Stan Musial drops from .335 with 120 RBIs to .325 with 110 RBIs, so they immediately cut his salary by 15%.
He’s Stan … Musial, you SOBs.
That bird who got hit by Randy’s pitch should have been awarded first base. Not that the bird would have appreciated it.
We’ll see with Ohtani come the 2025 season. The Dodgers’ front office is ridiculously smart, so they may prefer him as simply a slugging DH rather than have him sit out for a third Tommy John surgery. On the other hand, Shohei Ohtani is an incredible competitor, so he may demand to pitch.
We shall see.
Imagine that in 1965 the top HR hitter on the Dodgers only had 12 home runs, but Hank had 44? Bats .319 and doesn’t win an mvp? In 1972 the Phillies won 59 games, Steve Carlton went 27-9, and he didn’t get a sniff at mvp. Koufax was a media darling. He was a very good pitcher for a few years during the expansion era, but he’s borderline hall of fame, at best. Unless there’s a few other pitchers with only 165 wins that I missed.
It would probably be very difficult to get a list of the names of the BBWAA members who voted for those awards, but their website does list past presidents and secretaries.
The three presidents’ names from his CY winning years were Hal Lebovitz, Joe McGuff and Bob Wolf.
The secretary from 1957 – 1966 was Hy Hurwitz. Make of that what you will.
Regardless, Koufax probably was the best pitcher in baseball during that stretch. But as has been established here and other places favoritism (Jackie Robinson) and anti-favoritism (Curt Schilling) absolutely exists in the MLB front office and among their media lackeys.
IIRC Maddux was a free agent, but yes the hapless Cubs couldn’t get a deal done. Big mistake.
Yes, Carlos, was an actve volcano, but the guy I mentioned is Victor.
Interesting, I suppose if you’re hyper focused on the strike zone and have “good stuff” that day, probably doesn’t matter much what side the hitter is on.
-Rooster
The ADL and Netanyahu rushing to say, “Elon did nothing wrong” was curious
Cone’s stats are comparable with guys like Mike Cuellar and Dave McNally as far as the win-loss column. Cone’s ERA is much higher. McNally and Cuellar had multiple seasons where they achieved 20 or more wins. McNally won 20 or more for 4 straight seasons, Cuellar pulled off the trick for 3 straight from 1969-71. Cuellar shared the CY Young Award with Denny McLain in 1969. These guys were imo better than Cone BUT they are not worthy of the HOF by any means and neither is Cone.
Yeah, I’ve seen that video. As Mick notes, he LIKED Drysdale and vice versa. But Drysdale wanted to win so badly, he didn’t mind beaning even a friend.
Compare Pedro Martinez best 5 consecutive years to Koufax. Closer than people realize. Clemens? Gibson? No pitcher ever has had only, a great 5,6 years and gotten into the HOF.
He won’t pitch on a staff where an, if healthy Kershaw, is the 5th or 6th starter.
Their front office could be dumb and they win the West by 10 games. Commissioner should not allow all that deferred money in best interest of baseball.
Ralph Kiner had a small strain of Jewish blood 🩸, but he was the hitting version of Koufax at least as far as hitting home runs. Kiner only played from 1946-55, but still managed to hit 369 home runs and produce over a thousand runs batted in. That’s averaging nearly 37 home runs per season. Dave Kingman blasted 442 home runs ( despite the name I don’t know if Kong was a Jew) but he played from 1971-1986. Kingman wouldn’t be in anyone’s HOF. Lol.
While we’re at it, let’s take issue with some selections versus those not selected.
CC Sabathia
SUMMARY
Career
WAR 62.3
W 251
L 161
ERA 3.74
G 561
GS 560
SV 0
IP 3577.1
SO 3093
WHIP 1.259
Curt Schilling
SUMMARY
Career
WAR 79.5
W 216
L 146
ERA 3.46
G 569
GS 436
SV 22
IP 3261.0
SO 3116
WHIP 1.137
I am a Phillies fan, so Schilling has a special place in my fan-heart. We all know why he is NOT in. Sabathia has 3000 ks so he deserves it. Schilling postseason should have guaranteed entrance. Jack Morris is in probably due to his postseason heroics. Schilling goes in eventually.
Whereas anyone who attended games in Exhibition Stadium, mere feet from the lake– was it “metres” yet?– would have appreciated Her Majesty’s bestowal of one of the Empire’s many medals on Dave Winfield for removing at least one of those nasty gulls.
Pay for his substack?
Can’t you hack?
Are you stupid?
Anyway, it’s the same old stuff. You can have your favorite AI write an iSteve column on whatever you like. Maybe Sailer already does that. Gets him out of the closest and gives him more time to go for walks with his dog and play golf.
It’s a grand age we live in.
Did they rate pitching above hitting? Ruth had similar anthropometry to Sam Snead and I’m guessing was also double jointed, so they may have been right?
They should pitch him once a week, something he is familiar with since that is the Japanese system. Both his hitting and pitching would destract less from each other. The Dodgers have the arms to work around this and not go to a six man rotation, although considering the history of their starters a six man rotatation would make the most sense.
Speaking about not posting statistics, we eagerly await your next unz.com article regarding Trump’s blitzkrieg to dismantle government statistics. Certainly as our alleged pattern expert it is most disconcerting given that you rely on that data for your NOTICINGS.
https://www.npr.org/2025/01/24/nx-s1-5250264/unemployment-rate-cpi-inflation-census-bureau-labor-statistics
“The duration of what, however, was never quite specified.”
Speaking about things not specified, perhaps it’s time for you to clearly and concisely define and provide examples of “anti-white”. I understand that’s the cagey narrative you spin, but after three decades, the public seems ready for a change.
McCarver also was HOF P STL/PHI Steve Carlton’s favorite catcher during the late 60’s and throughout the 70’s.
This is similar to Jim Bouton’s Ball Four, where he states that as a younger pitcher on the Yankees during the early 60’s during contract negotiations, they would remind him that he would receive in addition to his salary a WS share of 10k.
But they never would agree to put that 10k in his contract guaranteeing it, should NY not make the WS (or win it).
Keep in mind that prior to the lively ball era beginning in the 20’s, the vast majority of MLB hitters didn’t strike out very much. It was extremely rare for hitters back then to have 100 or more K’s per season. Even striking out 50 or 60 times per season was considered a bit too much.
So the fact that Walter Johnson during his career recorded over 3,500 career K’s when he played most of career during the Dead Ball Era (when very few hitters struck out a whole bunch a lot), and that it took until Nolan Ryan to best his career K total in 1983 (56 yrs after Walter retired), is simply amazing. Especially since Ryan played his career when many hitters in MLB struck out over 100 times per season–there were plenty of strikeouts in MLB to be had, then as now, and Ryan was more than fortunate enough to beat Steve Carlton out for the all time K total.
In other words, it was far more impressive for Walter Johnson to strike out 313 hitters in 1910, than it was when Nolan Ryan struck out 383 batters in 1973 (especially since Koufax had struck out 382 batters in 1965). By that time tons of batters were striking out a whole bunch a lot.
Not the case in Walter’s time.
Basically prior to say, 1960, other metrics should be used besides K’s when judging how good or great a pitcher was in MLB (like W’s or ERA’s per season).
That’s a good one – hadn’t heard it. I remember hearing one about another ’50s pitcher (Preacher Roe, maybe?). He unleashed a hellacious spitter, which broke so much that the umpire (who had been desperately trying to avoid getting involved in a controversy) finally had to demand to look at the ball. Of course, the catcher rolled it back to the mound. The ump went out to look at it, and Roe immediately started protesting loudly about how offended he was that the umpire would even suspect him of such a dastardly act. The ump finally gave in and turned around to head back to the plate, whereupon Roe said loudly, “That last one was sure a beaut though, wasn’t it?”.
Yeah – I think bad managers in both cases. The ’59 Braves lost the pennant to the Dodgers, who basically had Drysdale, a few fading pieces from their Brooklyn club (Snider, Hodges, etc.) who were way over the hill, and half a season of Maury Wills. Koufax was pre-Koufax, and the big power threat was Wally Moon, whose game was hitting 260 ft pop flies that just cleared the ridiculous LA Coliseum left-field fence. The Braves got great seasons from Aaron (MVP) and Mathews, but down the stretch, the manager (Fred Haney, who I believe was the Hollywood Stars manager in the mel belli Burdette comment) decided to pull a Gene Mauch and ride Spahn and Burdette exclusively. As a consequence, instead of both of them going 20-10 as they had the year before, they both went 21-15, with the extra losses coming as they tired from overuse. Also, Haney insisted on platooning at first base. So 2/3 of the time, instead of having righty Joe Adcock (.292 BA/ .535 SA, 25 HR) in the lineup, he had lefty Frank Torre (Joe’s brother, .228 BA/.304 SA, 1 HR).
The Twins should have dominated the league for a few years there. Especially in ’67 – Killebrew had a great year, Bob Allison was still real good, deep pitching staff headed by Dean Chance. My guess is that Sam Mele and Cal Ermer were just not great leaders of men. By the time Billy Martin took over and got things sorted out, the Orioles had put together a juggernaut and it was too late.
It might have been Earl Weaver who said the manager can’t do much to win games, but he can sure lose them.
All pitching stats from 1963 to 1968 should have an asterisk.
Or a star of David
Schilling will never get in because baseball writers are lefty nerds that were shoved in lockers by guys like Schilling
Meh. This is like people who think Obama was the antichrist. Joe Biden is certainly a scum bag, but one of a decidedly pedestrian, mediocre variety. We’ve all dealt with his type over the years: the dishonest tradesman, the guy who makes a pass at your daughter, the used car salesman you realize you do not want to buy a car from…
That sort may well go to hell, but they’ll have lots of company.
The ones I reserve my ire for are his handlers, the ones who chose him and fed him his lines. Where should they go?
Musk did kowtow. Plus, he’s powerful enough that the Jews may not want to make an enemy out of him. No doubt he’s scared of the Jews — but maybe the Jews are scared of him. Worried enough that they don’t want a cage match, anyway. Even if they won, they might lose.
What about Fernando Valenzuela … inducted into the HoF in 2014 … one hell of a pitcher for 17 years …
Steve, I still think you are sabotaging yourself by paywalling so many of your Substack posts. I notice you remain stuck at 5-6,000 subscribers. But why would you expect otherwise when you insist on hiding your light under a bushel? If people who are unfamiliar with you can’t read your best stuff, why would they subscribe? Where are your new subscribers going to come from? But if you work on maximizing the number of your readers (as opposed to subscribers), and impressing them with your insights, many would be willing to pay for the privilege of commenting, or seeing occasional hidden posts, or just to support you, and there would be the potential for growth. Other bloggers do it that way, so it’s a viable model. At minimum you should unpaywall posts after some period of time.
I’ve contributed maybe $500 to your panhandling drives over the years, but making occasional voluntary donations is different from autopay. I haven’t subscribed to your Substack, because there are so many worthwhile sites out there demanding monthly payment. I can’t pay for all of them, and I’m unwilling to start down that road, so I don’t pay for any. So yes, it’s a little frustrating for me personally that I can’t read your paywalled posts.
But what bothers me more is that you are limiting your reach. When you came up with the Sailer Strategy your posts were easily accessible to influential public figures, and you had an impact. Do you really think those same people are going to reach into their pockets and commit to monthly subscription fees so they can read you on a regular basis? Even the ones who’ve read you in the past probably aren’t going to do that, they’ve got a lot on their plates. (Plus they might worry about being doxxed contributing to a crimethinker). No, these are people who regularly get emails saying “hey, you should read this, it’s good”, and if they click on the link and it’s paywalled they are going to just move on. So, do you want them to be able to read your “this is good” posts or not?
Very important observations, Steve. Take away Koufax, and the Dodgers were a mediocre team. Drysdale was himself most seasons a mediocre innings-eater (e.g., 19-17, 18-16).
Drysdale got into the HOF via an implicit package deal with Koufax. There was a package deal when they played, too. During the 1960s they would negotiate their respective contracts together, which had to hurt Koufax.
All of the great Dodgers, the “boys of summer,” of those amazing teams when they were “the bums” who went to the World Series every year, and with one exception (1955) lost every year to the Yankees, were gone or over the hill by the early ’60s. And yet, they won it all in ’59, ’63, and ’65. Koufax carried the team during the ’60s.
Something I’ve mentioned before: I have a friend who is retired from a career as a major mid-market daily sportswriter, who spent significant time as a MLB beat writer. Over all a good guy, but extremely liberal- makes Keith Olberman look like “literally Hitler”. He told me flat out that he left Schilling off his ballot because he didn’t like his politics
The Giants had a pretty good player who hit 52 dingers that year, and who won the MVP.
“All of the great Dodgers, the “boys of summer,” of those amazing teams when they were “the bums” who went to the World Series every year, and with one exception (1955) lost every year to the Yankees, were gone or over the hill by the early ’60s.”
But also keep in mind that during the late 40’s and throughout the 50’s, the Dodgers home field was Ebbets Field. Ebbets was by this time a bandbox, where it was easier to hit HRs as compared to say Yankee Stadium (which was more of a pitchers ballpark during this time).
One of the few things that I tend to concur with Sabermetrics, is the idea that ball parks can be skewed toward more HRs, R’s scored, whether or not they are more hitter or pitcher friendly, that sort of thing.
By contrast, Dodger Stadium, at least in its earlier years, tended to be more of a pitchers ballpark. Either that, or for some reason LA didn’t bother to draft many power hitters during the 60’s.
Regarding Sandy Koufax, one thing that has to be considered. For the most part, Koufax benefitted playing his prime years during the 1962-68 era when the strike zone was raised to the top of the shoulders (P’s would consistently get the high strikes called as opposed to post ’68). We see this with the culmination as 1968, the Year of the Pitcher, when HOF BOS OF Carl Yaztremski lead the AL in batting with a .301 average (even though Pete Rose won the NL batting title with .338). Drysdale pitched 58 and 2/3 scoreless innings, Gibson set a MLB record for ERA with 1.12, and Dennis McLain won 31 games.
The point being, is that Koufax benefitted by pitching during the 60’s. His first few years (1955-61) didn’t particularly demonstrate the consistent greatness that he would soon possess. Even the first few years in LA, pitching in the Colessium, Sandy didn’t show any traces of greatness.
It was only when LA moved to Dodger Stadium in 62, which coincided with the new pitcher friendly higher strike zone when Koufax really took off.
Sometimes wonder in the case of Koufax just how great he would have been had he played his prime years post 1968, when the strike
zone returned to previous ’62 levels. That’s a fair observation regarding his career.
You start with the hardened criminals and the non-criminals begin to contemplate their existence. Perhaps some of those self-deport. Anyway, this is better than open flood gates.
Lefty Carlton was 5th in MVP in 72, 77, and 80, all Cy Young years.
Koufax was prevented from pitching in the minors from 1955-1960 due to bonus baby rules, when he was pretty bad in the big leagues due to lack of control. Sandy, the top Jewish athlete of his generation, was a great athlete but wasn’t a great thinker, so he wasn’t all that smart at figuring out how to improve himself.
In spring training 1961, second string catcher Norm Sherry, a fellow Jew, suggested to Koufax that he try throwing more strikes. Sandy asked how, but Norm said, I dunno, let’s ask John Roseboro. So the two Jews asked the black guy, who said,
stop throwing so damn hard, slow down, and try to throw more strikes. Sandy and Norm said, wow, great idea, John, how’d you ever think of that?
So, in 1961, Koufax’s last pitching in the Coliseum, an asymmetrical stadium which had been set up to penalize left handed pitchers like Sandy, he went a fine 18-13 with the fifth best ERA in the league.
Then in 1962 he moved into Dodger Stadium with deep symmetrical fences and was 14-4 with a low ERA before blowing out his arm.
The in 1962 in Dodger Stadium with the new bigger strike zone, he went 25-5, then 19-5 while getting hurt again in 1964, then 26-8, then 27-9, and then retired at age 30 due to the agony in his arm. A decade later, Sandy’s surgeon Robert Kerlan’s younger partner, Frank Jobe, invented the Tommy John surgery.
By all accounts of old timers games and the like, Koufax could have pitched into his 40s with modern surgery. Bill James suggests that under modern thinking he would have had a lot of 16-5 seasons.
Curt Schilling is 32% over the usual cutoff for the Hall of Fame — 60 Wins Above Replacement — and is perhaps the greatest postseason pitcher ever: 11-2 with a 2.23 ERA. But he’s not in the Hall of Fame due to being a Trump supporter and a difficult personality.
I don’t believe Fernando is in the Hall of Fame. A fascinating personality, perhaps my favorite baseball player ever, but only a top pitcher for one decade rather than two.
Joe Adcock was pretty awesome. I can recall going to an Angels game in 1967 at age 8 and while we were walking into Angel Stadium, Adcock hit a homer, one of 18 in just 83 games in his final season during a pitcher’s era.
I can’t explain it, but I give fellows like Steve and the Zman $100 through snail mail every now and then, but I have no desire to spend a lesser amount on a subscription to their substacks. Weird, but there it is.
Thanks, Brutus. Never thought much of CC, but maybe it was my fatistism. I’d take Tommy John over CC or Roy Hallady every day.
Pitchers should probably wear those softball face masks that you see women softball players wear. I have seen pitchers “beaned” by some nasty comebackers over the years. Mike Mussina took a shot straight to the face which broke his nose. I saw an Atlanta Braves pitcher get popped by a bullet that bounced off his forehead a couple feet in the air, immediately this large hematoma formed on this guy’s noggin. He walked off the field after being examined but I imagined he had quite the headache. Imagine the impact and speed of a ball smoked right back to the mound only 60 feet away.
A travesty that Sal “the Barber” Maglie is not in the Hall, a man about whom Bill Madden, sportswriter for the New York Daily News, wrote that Maglie would never be a Hall of Famer unless “there’s a Hall of Fame just for pitchers whom you wanted to have the ball in a game you had to win”. One of my Dad’s favorite pitchers.
On a related note, the youngest person who was alive when the Dodgers, Giants, and Yankees all played in NYC is now 67 years old.
O Tempora! O Mores!
“They lie to us, we know they’re lying, they know we know they’re lying, but they keep lying to us,”
Yes, Musk, Theil, and the other billionaires do that. So why do you continue to believe that they will look out in your best interests?
Don’t be fooled by Carlson.
https://lawliberty.org/book-review/maximum-john-versus-tricky-dick/
—However, while it makes sense to trace Sirica’s injudicious behavior to his friendship with Williams, actual evidence is lacking. As Shepard is the first to admit, there is no record of what was actually said during the documented ex parte meetings, much less what may have occurred during undocumented ones. All that exists, really, is the suggestion of untoward, extrajudicial influence.
Another kind of problem crops up when Shepard describes what he considers unethical ex parte meetings between attorneys from the Watergate Special Prosecution Force and Sirica. The author draws inferences from a record that is admittedly scant and entirely circumstantial. He leaves out the context in which these meetings occurred, and the unprecedented substantive and procedural issues that were at stake. Could a sitting President be indicted by a federal grand jury for obstruction of justice? Or was impeachment the only proper recourse for presidential misconduct in office? Shepard also apparently made no effort to interview the lawyers who are still around who participated in these meetings. That makes his account read like a legal brief alleging improprieties rather than a fleshed out revisionist history, as much as one is needed.
Even if one were to accept parts or even most of Shepard’s argument—that Democrats’ single-minded pursuit of Watergate represented a partisan and ideological effort to overturn the 1972 election and “get Nixon,” regardless of the truth or consequences—his premise about what constituted the “real scandal” does not hold up. Regardless of Sirica’s bias and agenda, or the Senate Watergate Committee’s political cast, the June 17 break-in and the White House-orchestrated cover-up of that crime remain the genuine article. No one knew this better than Nixon, with his three decades of experience in national politics. He had no illusions about how Washington worked behind the scenes, and knew just what his political antagonists would try to achieve if he gave them cause.—
Cricketers are occasionally killed by fast bowlers. Here’s an example from about a decade ago.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/30219440
Right. Because pitchers shouldn’t win an MVP. They get the Cy Young.
A couple of points.
Steve can decide what does and doesn’t get paywalled.
The quality of the conversation over there is much better. None of the childish exchanges and score settling. I’m sure that will change as people get off their wallets though.
Choosing not to subscribe to one Substack because you can’t subscribe to all those you like is like refusing to subscribe to a magazine or newspaper for the same reason. People make choices on what to spend money on all the time.
It’s sad that maybe there isn’t as much free ice cream as before, but I’m happy to pay for quality writing and thoughtful opinion.
Steve absolutely deserves to get paid.
I think the stat is that about 10% of pitchers who have Tommy John surgery come back and pitch well. Saying he would have come back is far from a certainty. Just a way to justify a below borderline pitcher getting in. There aren’t any other 165 game winners in the hall, are there? If injury justifies letting a player in, where are Don Mattingly and David Wright? Great players who would have had even greater careers if a surgery for their back issues was invented.
Saying who is the best player in a particular sport in any particular era is difficult. I do not follow baseball, mainly because I grew up in Indianapolis and we did not have a major league team. They did have a competitor to the NBA back then, the ABA. The ABA Indiana Pacers were the top team in that league and were popular enough here that the NBA took them in when the ABA folded.
The Pacers, the Bobby Knight led IU teams and my small town high school team going to the state finals got me interested in basketball. The pro team that was winning the most titles when I started my interest were the Boston Celtics. You would have to say, based on that, Bill Russell was the best player. It is possible, though, that he just had a group of players around him that complemented him best. Wilt Chamberlain never really had that until his early seventies Lakers teams.
Yep, a mildly corrupt Delaware pol. Not the epitome of evil. Just dumb, lazy, and dishonest.
Greatest postseason pitcher ever? Greater than HOF Whitey Ford, who has the most WS wins, with 10? Yeah, okay.
Difficult personalities abound in the HOF so that can’t be a major reason entirely.
Does it really come down to Schilling being a Trump supporter? If it’s simply that then that’s really petty to keep him out of the HOF.
Also, Schilling is nowhere near 300 career Wins. David Wells has more career Wins, for example, and he’s not going into the HOF anytime soon. It might also have helped Schilling’s case if he’d won a Cy Young Award during his career.
But then, I don’t entirely understand why Mike Mussina was inducted into the HOF. Except there was a Baltimore Sun reporter who later found fame with FOX and is a HOF voter, who wrote many times that Mike was among his favorite pitchers.
So perhaps it really does come down to various sportswriters have their personal favorites and those that they can’t stand. So borderline players had better find a way to be extra great, or else it’ll be a long time coming until they receive the call from Cooperstown.
He really told you that? Wow. I understand that pettiness does occur in sports, but to tacitly admit to this level just takes the cake.
Indeed — but I’m skeptical it will be enough. You can already see the road ahead: ‘the media says we’re deporting women and children — but it’s just the bad actors we’re arresting!’
…and the implication of that is all the cuddly women and children get to stay.
…and they will, and that’ll wind up being another ten million new ‘Americans’ — and still more corrosion of the national fabric. And they’ll create pressure to somehow bring in their sister, and their sister’s family, and…
And it repeats the lesson of the 1980’s amnesty. Just get in, and somehow you’ll get legalized eventually. That’s what happens. I know a family of about ten siblings — and their spouses, and their children. They mostly came in illegally, then got legalized…somehow. They’re all citizens now.
Well, that’s mighty fine, or at least water under the bridge. But this has to end. If it doesn’t, there’s not going to be a recognizable America left.
We need massive, sweeping, immediate deportations. Volunteer, and you get a thousand dollar check! And you don’t have to wait in a barbed wire pen! The plane awaits!
This is a mess, and it has to be cleaned up. It’ll be unpleasant, but…
Bob Gibson-another negro racist with a White wife.
The pitching staffs of the circa-1970 Baltimore Orioles and the early-mid 1950s Cleveland Indians (also 3 HOF pitchers) would like a word with you.
The great Walter Johnson was one of the nicest people in baseball, and one of the hardest throwers. He was terrified of accidentally hitting a batter, and never really threw at max power for that reason, in case he lost control by letting it rip. Ty Cobb and other savvy batters exploited Johnson’s niceness by crowding the plate at bat-knowing he’d never brush them back.
Ray Chapman-Carl Mays: terrible tragedy, compounded by a number of things. Chapman was universally beloved by teammates, fans, and opposing players-even Ty Cobb liked him. Mays, who lived a terribly hard life since childhood, was not sociable at all-to anyone. His strange pitching motion made it hard for batters to track the ball as it came at them–and he was a known spitball pitcher, which sometimes caused control issues, plus he didn’t not hesitate to brush back batters. All this was widely known, of course–and when Chapman was hit, all the ill will Mays had accumulated was vented at him tenfold.
Babe Ruth was prouder of his 29+ scoreless innings in the two World Series that he pitched in than any of his batting stats. Ruth was always extra amazing in October–pitching-wise, he was 3-0 with an 0.87 ERA with 31 innings pitched. 2 complete games-including one of 14 innings.
Two words: Ryne Duren–hell, he once hit a batter in the on deck circle–I think it was Jimmy Piersall. Talk about an all time baseball eccentric summit meeting…
middle aged vet said: That is a question for SABR guys and I am not one – but I do know Ruth really really liked to eat as much he wanted (for people who do not know his backstory, he had a deprived childhood at an orphanage, and nobody should blame him for wanting to make up for lost time). Ruth had to have noticed, in the years Sailer is talking about, that pitchers 5 years older than him that did eat as much as they wanted were at the end of their careers while hitters that did that were able to remain productive after putting on a lot of pounds. (Yes, Boomer Wells and the Falstaffian (Ronny Darling’s term) Bartolo Colon are counter-arguments… but for every two Boomers and Bartolos you have twenty literally obese men hitting fourth or fifth in the lineup on very good teams).
Drysdale and Koufax were childhood idols. Orlando Cepeda said the key to Drysdale was hit him before he hits you. Drysdale had some funny sayings. Why walk a batter on four pitches when you can hit him with one? Hit one of my guys and I’ll get two of yours and they won’t be .220 hitters either.
“Babe Ruth was a great American because he didn’t listen to what other people told him he should do.”
Just like Biden? How about Jordan Peterson? Or how about Jews?
Wait, it’s Trump in hot eyes. Although…
—A recent Wall Street Journal poll showed the public would prefer a more restrained Trump. Most voters say, for instance, that only undocumented immigrants with criminal records should be deported, and longtime residents who entered the U.S. illegally should be protected. Most voters in the poll expressed skepticism of Trump’s plans to replace career civil-service workers, and 57% opposed pardoning those convicted in the Jan. 6 riot at the Capitol.—
Completely OT- worth watching
“…Watergate was a scam…”
Really? No kidding?
Follow-up to this:
>There are basically two ways that LLMs are improved today:
>1) You can train the spreadsheet better, using improved training data, reward functions, and methodologies.
>2) You can add code to “drive” the underlying LLM.
>(1) is what DeepSeek R1 does
>(2) is what OpenAI is doing
>What makes R1 so interesting is that it demonstrates that ultimately, OpenAI did nothing more that “improve the spreadsheet” in a complicated, expensive way.
>That result is shocking to basically all researchers outside DeepSeek—everyone believed you need to up the complexity.
>The conceptual mistake has to do with misunderstanding human reasoning.
>OpenAI (and everyone else) hold a “mystical” view of reason and rationality—they believe it “emerges” with scale and complexity.
>DeepSeek R1 refutes this Less Wrong-style “rationalist” view of reason.
>DeepSeek R1 demonstrates that reasoning is literally just trained token output, nothing more.
>It’s not reasoning in the way that a proof checker like Inria’s Coq reasons.
>It’s not emergent, but rather TRAINED.
>It’s pure, unadulterated next token prediction.
>As long we take a mystical view of human reason, seeing it as a “capability” being “expressed” or “learned” instead of what it actually is: reason “LARPing” via next token prediction, Western researchers will continue to fall behind.
>Humans don’t reason, period.
>There is no “capability to reason”—it’s all next token prediction (which can be trained). There’s no separate capability, just longer (and longer) reason-like predictions.
>If you want actual reason, use a tool like Coq—it does reasoning (logical implication) correctly.
>If you want reason-like abilities, keep training LLMs like you would humans and keep in mind that it’s not ACTUALLY reason—it’s LARPing reason—but that’s good enough for many, even most tasks.
China really cooked:
I am glad to say that Angel Blue sang beautifully in today’s live broadcast of Aida from the Met in NYC.
Several of the singers at the end of the opera put their hands on their hearts, but none followed up with an outstretched arm. I guess they all got the Don’t be a Nazi memo.
Judit Kutasi, who played the bad girl Amneris, was so overcome by the applause for her performance that she teared up. Well worth $22.
WDCB.org
’s Those Were the Days for today is dedicated to the Barrymores, in case anyone is interested.Availible on their two week archive.
https://wdcb.org/archive
IIRC, Michael Jordan said, “Republicans buy sneakers too.”
Twere I a world famous athlete/movie star and someone asked me what I thought about [insert crucial topic here], I would simply say. “Why are you asking me? I play ball/pretend to be someone else for a living!”
LOL and Agree.
I don’t know much about baseball, but even I remember the bloody sock. What more do you want from a guy?
And yes, the baseball MSM is a bunch of liberal jock sniffing pussies.
It’s in the Bible. Nehemiah 8:1.
Kiner amassed triple the WAR of Kingman in 1200 fewer Plate appearances. Kiner led the league in HRs 7 consecutive years and had a lifetime OPS+ of 149. Kingman led league in HRs twice and had lifetime OPS+ of 115.
“Two words: Ryne Duren–hell, he once hit a batter in the on deck circle–I think it was Jimmy Piersall. Talk about an all time baseball eccentric summit meeting…”
Agreed with all points, except…
In an interview with Tim Russert ca.2003, HOF NY C Yogi Berra was directly asked about Duren’s wildness, to which Yogi replied “Nah, Ryne did that on purpose. Mind you, he was a bit wild when he first come up (to MLB) but afterwards he was fine….It was mostly an act.”
“Kingman blasted 442 home runs ( despite the name I don’t know if Kong was a Jew) but he played from 1971-1986. Kingman wouldn’t be in anyone’s HOF. Lol.”
If they can induct Rice, and now Allen, then they can induct Kingman. Perhaps what hurt Dave the most was not being well liked by the sportswriters who cast the HOF votes. If he had been well liked, he’d be in.
IF Giambi hadn’t been caught with PEDS…he’d be in, and the media almost universally loved him up that point (prior to public admission of PEDS).
Little by little, Cooperstown is really turning into the Hall of Very Good, of “yeah, well, what the hell, let’s put that dude in too as well.” type of thing.
An unguarded moment…
Jordan Peterson is Canadian.
I was looking for the Roman salute and was disappointed. Both the divas went to their knees at the applause. I’ve not seen that before.
“Jordan Peterson is Canadian.”
Yes, I know. You don’t get sarcasm, do you? Or the overall point I made. Then again, you’re from Mexico, so you are oblivious to things American.
Say Hey!
I remember a game where Pedro Martinez was cruising through the Yankee$ with pinpoint control, and Gary Sheffield decided it was a good time to pull a Mike (The Human Rain Delay) Hargrove and then step out during Pedro’s windup. Pedro calmly drilled him between the numbers. Oops.
Take a look at Mike Cuellar pitching in the 1971 Series. Seems like if he hit you there wouldn’t even be a bruise.
I think the induction of Harold Baines pretty much clinched the deal.
https://www.baseball-reference.com/players/b/baineha01.shtml
As they should forever be in my opinion. Throughout the history of baseball, the large majority of the rules that have changed over time were for the benefit of the hitter. For when left alone, the pitching slowly begins to dominate or find a way to be more effective within the rules. There are so many changes over the history of the game but I will list a few more recent ones:
Lowering the mound, allowing hitters to wear more and more armor, lighter, more dangerous bat specifications contributing to higher exit velocities, putting the pitcher’s head at even more risk since it is difficult to pitch effectively with a helmet on. Most pitchers don’t want to hurt anyone, but to compete at the highest levels, you need to take advantage of ever edge you can get. Intimidation is one of those tools, but so is being able to utilize the inner-half.
Currently, even though players these days are in better physical shape than ever before, carry more muscle on average than ever before (except maybe for the steroid era), and can utilize a juiced ball (yes, it is still juiced, just not as much as a couple of years ago) the fences at the major league stadiums now resemble high school fields and in some cases they are even smaller than this. So the total acreage that fielders have to cover is forever shrinking, while the league tries to find out why averages keep going down.
While some of this is surely due to the fact that pitchers are averaging over 94 M.P.H. in the Majors for the first time ever, I believe you could easily raise the number of hits if you simply had a more size appropriate playing surface like you could find in the past when individual ballparks had much more character and more unique dimensions.
Remember when Camden Yards started the new era of retro parks that were supposed to be great for the game because they are unique and no longer saucer shaped? Well, in 2025 the ballparks are more uniform than ever before, and baseball is poorer for it.
Thank you for this interesting article, sorry for the rant.
Speaking of Piersall and Yankees hitting batsmen, there’s another Piersall story in that vein. On this particular day, the Yankee pitcher was being particularly aggressive about claiming the plate, and had already hit two guys. Piersall came to bat and told catcher Yogi Berra (the pitcher’s name is not recorded in the anecdote), “If you knock me down, I’m going to hit you over the head with this bat, then plead insanity. And I’m the one guy that can get away with it”. To which Yogi replied, “Don’t worry, Jim. We don’t knock down .230 hitters”.
Koufax was my first sports hero, and still the greatest.
A car accident in Orange County broke my right arm and made me a lefty, right when I was admiring Sandy.
I still have my kindergarten scrapbook, complete with an LA Times article I cut out: a photo of Sandy with his arm in a locker room sink after a game. That was when he retired; and I nearly cried!
I am happy to read, from you, Steve Sailer, that my first hero was indeed a good man, a fair player who did not try to hit batters.
Thank you.
The picture that broke my 6-year-old heart:

You know, sometimes I read a post without noticing the name. I wonder ‘who is this idiot?’
Then I glance up to see who wrote it, and…
Not always, but a remarkably high percentage of the time.
See above.
RC, you’re hopeless.
“You don’t like our freedom, fine, I do not shake hands with white enslavers.” Gustavo Petro 75th and current president of Colombia since 2022.
All of those players are incomparably better than Kingman. The worst of them , Jim Rice had almost triple the WAR that Kingman amassed (47.7 to 17.8). By WAR Kingman is around the 1600th ranked player in MLB history.
Don Drysdale was nice to Greg Brady.
Hey, you brought up the long-forgotten Watergate circus the very day that verse was in a reading at Mass. It was irresistible.
Steve of course has a right to decide how to run his site. And I have a right to try to convince him that some of his decisions aren’t in his best interest and should be reconsidered. I notice that you didn’t address any of the points I made.
Whitey Ford 10-8 (22 starts) with a 2.71 ERA. 6 of the 10 WS his ERA was over 4.10.
Schilling 4-1 (7 starts) with a 2.06 ERA. Likely would’ve had a 5th win if B Hyun Kim had not wet the bed. 11-2 overall postseason record. Dude was money.
No hablo Español, gilipollas.
Didn’t Shepard say in his interview with Carlson that the substance of the Sirica meetings is contained in Jaworski’s notes, recently recovered, and that he planned to reveal them in his next book? I didn’t follow-up about the book.
Yeah, Harold Baines was a fine ballplayer, but a Hall of Famer? Maybe if he’d gotten to 3000 hits, but he finally topped out around 2850.
WAR isn’t the be and end all of HOF induction. There are other means as well.
For example:
3k career H’s
500 HR’s
For a hitter, both HR’s and H’s are based over a lengthy career. They are also individualized stats. Whereas WAR, while quite useful, can only tell so much. After all, all those games won that can be directly traced to a hitter…then how directly does that affect his team’s W/L record for a specific year? Very hard to break down with 100% accuracy.
However, for a starting pitcher, WAR can definitely and directly be traced to the player, especially since the W per season is a major big time stat.
Like, having won 300 games over a career, of which Schilling for example, does not have.
Yes, but was Don equally as nice to Jethro, Ellie Mae and Granny? And…was Don respectful to MR. Drysdale at his bank?
Uh, so was Whitey Ford.
Google AI, can you supply some additional context?
“Whitey Ford’s career winning percentage was .690, which is the highest for pitchers with at least 200 wins in the modern era. ”
“Likely would’ve had a 5th win”
Shoulda, coulda…but didn’t. Ya don’t get extra credit for shouldas. It doesn’t work that way.
Schilling pitched in 3 WS, Ford pitched in 11 WS. Unlike Schilling, For won the Cy Young Award (back when both leagues competed for a single Award).
Talking about money…Ford pitched 33 1/3 scoreless innings in the 60-61 WS. That’s about as money as you can get (since it happened during the WS).
And Ford has more career W’s than Schilling. Ford would’ve been first ballot, but was inducted into the HOF his second year so that he could go in with his teammate and good friend, Mickey Mantle.
With Ford, NY won 6 WS Championships. Schilling has 2, and 6 is a bigger number than 2.
Just willing to sell out his fellow whites. More than willing, eager. Good old Joe Biden. He has his quirks but who doesn’t?
> No, these [influential public figures] are people who regularly get emails saying “hey, you should read this, it’s good”, and if they click on the link and it’s paywalled they are going to just move on.
One point to consider is that Substack subscribers get (or can opt in to getting) paywalled posts sent to them as emails. These can be forwarded. Your points are valid, presumably this is an effort by Substack to straddle the “freemium” line.
Schilling pitched in 4 WS and has 3 rings.
OT, but a developing example of a longstanding iSteve theme.
Twitter, Jan. 26, 2025 at 5:21 PM:
Just now:
Search of the New York Times website (01/21/2025 – 01/27/2025): “Showing 0 results for Adrian Peeler”
You made your case for why you think limiting posts to Substack is a bad idea for Steve and the larger world. I made a case for why it’s not such a bad thing. I don’t feel the need to make a point by point rebuttal. There is merit to your position without a doubt, but there are also positives to Steve’s current way of doing things.
Gosh, things must be bad when a battle-hardened Green Beret like Blumenthal drops the ball.
“Didn’t Shepard say in his interview with Carlson that the substance of the Sirica meetings is contained in Jaworski’s notes”
About that, from New York University School of Law Professor Stephen Gillers.
–The two principal sources today for judicial recusal in the federal system are the Code of Conduct for U.S. Judges and 28 USC section 455. The former was adopted in 1973 (and amended since) and the latter was enacted in 1974, with minor amendments thereafter. The Code, at least, would have been applicable to Judge Sirica’s 1974 meetings. That aside, there was, even before the Code and the statute, an understanding that in our adversary system ex parte meetings between a judge and fewer than all parties (or their counsel) was forbidden with some exceptions and for reasons described below.
The first ex parte meeting that Shepard describes (on December 14, 1973) cannot be the basis for criticizing Sirica. There is no indication of the substance of the discussion. So Shepard is left to speculate about what the first meeting “could not have been” about and what “seems quite likely” was Sirica’s purpose. I have argued elsewhere that ex parte meetings with judges, when permitted, should be held on the record. But that was not then and is not now required in federal court.”–
The fact of the matter is that Nixon covered up the dirty tricks operations of the men who served him to gain an advantage of their political opponents.
You have cited his lack of 300 wins numerous times as a reason Schilling does not belong in the HOF. Justin Verlander is 38 away. The next most wins by an active player is Max Scherzer at 216. Kershaw is 212. Nobody else is even close (Gerrit Cole at age 33 is barely halfway there at 153 wins).
Other than maybe Verlander, it is likely that there will never be another 300 win pitcher. So by your logic, there will never another SP that deserves to be in the HOF?
Agreed that it’s not the end all and be all, but it’s a good proxy for overall value. Kingman had low value. His lifetime win total is barely ahead of Rob Deer, another one trick pony with great power and little overall value, and Kingman had nearly twice the plate appearances. In addition to his batting deficiencies (.236 BA, .302 OBA) he was a true Dr. Strangeglove butcher in the field with a -17 career defensive WAR.
Indeed, and, pace Yojimbo’s point, even Baines was more than twice as valuable as Dave Kingman.
I agree. The reason I bring up Dave Kingman is that he’s a proxy for what the HOF has become, namely, that it’s no longer about induction of the top 1% within the top 1%, the best of the very best, the greatest players to have ever played the game. The quality of the HOF is becoming diluted with second tier level players. Granted, some if not many of these inductees would indeed be part of the top 1% of those to have played in MLB; but they’re not within the greatest of the greatest level to have played the game. And in that sense, the quality is becoming more and more diluted. Especially with the Veterans Committee getting to have direct input on inductees.
I would state that the concept itself is not needed. The idea that fans and sportswriters alike had absolutely no idea that such and such a player was relevant UNTIL about a decade ago, and newer Sabermetric based states declared them to be so…OR that the players on the Veterans Comittee had former teammates and decided to push hard for their inclusion…is mind boggling to say the least. And it should stop.
“Other than maybe Verlander, it is likely that there will never be another 300 win pitcher. ”
Neither you nor I have a crystal ball. Never say never again. It’s always possible. It isn’t a particularly difficult stat to reach over a career. Granted, that over the last decade or so there are becoming some new challenges, but again, anything is possible.
“So by your logic, there will never another SP that deserves to be in the HOF?”
Yes and no. Certainly newer SP’s careers should be measured vs their past counterparts.
Also, having 3k SO’s isn’t so difficult a milestone to reach, as opposed to 300 W’s. So, perhaps, make it a bit more challenging, say, 3,500k SO’s would be the benchmark for HOF induction.
MLB for at least since the 50’s/60’s, has been in a heavy strikeout era, where batters accumulating 100 + SO’s per season aren’t hard to find. For the most part, most HR sluggers accumulate this feat every single year of their career. Thus, SP’s who are even above average can accumulate SO’s without even much of an effort.
That’s what made someone like a Walter Johnson much more effective–he recorded 200-300 SO’s in a season back during the Dead Ball Era, when few batters struck out on the whole. It just wasn’t a major thing like it is in every single game in MLB played today. But…Walter Johnson also won games as well.
In fact you don’t start to see P’s challenge Walter Johnson’s career SO total until the 60-80’s era, because SO’s for batters as a whole greatly increased in MLB where it remains today.
So SO’s as a stat are excellent, but what else is going on? ERA then as now is definitely a most important stat.
And so are W’s, because then as now a team is greatly interested in which SP’s are most effective for their teams overall W-L seaonal totals.
I also don’t think Baines should be in HOF. Nor Jim Rice, nor Dick Allen, and unfortunately, nor Parker. But again, other factors come into focus when the HOF voting occurs.
Koufax’s first positon as a boy, if you can believe the young adult biography I read as a teen (some of those can be fictionalized in part, especially concerning the subject’s childhood), was catcher, like Ruth before him. One of those two, Koufax I think, took a standard mitt apart and resewed it lefty. The other made do on the wrong hand.
Koufax’s dad was truly ambidextrous. He could write with both hands, in opposite directions, simultaneously. Not much call for that skill in the real world, though. A “parlor trick”. When people still had parlors.
Nothing to disagree about–I never implied his antics didn’t have elements of intentional theater involved. His top end fastball was legit 100 MPH, and at that speed, control is dicey for the best of pitchers. He was wild, but nowhere near as wild as his actions implied.
Duren played it up, with his coke bottle glasses and his well-earned rep for being a blackout drunk. He’d warm up, peering at the catcher like a blind man with a bad hangover, then rip a fastball 10 feet over the catcher’s head. Batters on the other team took notice. Duren was six-one and about 190–same size as Walter Johnson and Bob Gibson.
The idea of “menacing” or “mean” pitchers is nonsense. It was often said that Lee Smith was an imposing figure on the mound, yet he is at the bottom of the list of nasty pitchers. Billy Wagner, just voted into the HOF, often hit 100 on the radar gun even though he was just average size (5’10” and 180 lbs.). Lucky for him, he was a lefthander. If he’d been a righthander, most scouts would have said he was too small to be a big league pitcher. If there is such a thing as privilege in baseball, it belongs to left-handed pitchers. There are fewer of them so they are more valuable. Also, they supposedly mature slower than right-handers so teams are more patient with them during their early years. Koufax, for example, certainly didn’t set the world on fire during his early years. But the Dodgers stuck with him and he paid big dividends.
While baseball pundits often opine that Koufax’s bonus baby years in Brooklyn would have been better spent in the minors, he would not be in the HOF if he had spent those seasons in the minors. To be eligible for the HOF, a player has to log 10 seasons. Koufax spent 9 years in LA. Without those 3 Brooklyn years, he wouldn’t be in the HOF no matter how dominant he was in LA.
I got to see Sandy Koufax in his last regular season appearance in Philadelphia in 1966. Of course, at the time I didn’t know he was going to retire. Maybe he wasn’t sure either.
You mean like yourself who wants to bring back Jim Crow to your local community? Yes, that’s next level idiocy.
How’s that coming along, Boss?
“No hablo Español, gilipollas.”
Your Colombian accent and bleached skin ain’t going to fool immigration officials, Cochise. Get the hell out of my country.
Dude, Vance married a Hindu and has three mixed kids who smell like curry. That is as anti- white as it gets, or so I’ve been told. And Trump the supposed white champion of MAGAland put him second in command. Isn’t that race betrayal, you hypocrite?
Wow.
How many businesses would have to be robbed blind before re-instution of Jim Crow were justified? As a believer in rationalism, you must have some objective figure in mind.
I have a similar story. In college, I was playing for the university’s club team. Our last game of the season was the week after the semester had ended, so a lot of the guys on the team had already headed home, especially the out-of-staters, so we only had nine for that game. I had gotten on base in one of the early innings; the pitcher attempted a pick-off, and as I was diving back, I dislocated my right shoulder. (To add insult to injury, the pick-off attempt was successful.) Our catcher popped the shoulder back in (people kinda gasped when he yanked on it really hard to pop it back in, to which he responded: “Don’t worry, I’m pre-med”). Since we only had nine I had to keep playing, but I couldn’t throw anymore, so I moved from third to first. I could still swing a bat without too much pain, and I somehow managed a hit in my last at-bat of the season (though it was basically just a weak dribbler up the middle that got by everyone).
Agree baseball can be scary, especially if you’re playing the hot corner. The other sport I’ve played a lot of is hockey, and I find baseball more nerve-wracking/scary than hockey. I’ve also gotten injured more playing baseball/softball than I have hockey.
Corvy the innumerate strikes again. Here’s a thought exercise: which practice results in more White babies as a percent of the population going forward, increasing births by the current population (Vance policy) or waiting for Whites to catch up with non Whites as a greater share of the immigrant, legal or otherwise, population?
“You mean like yourself who wants to bring back Jim Crow . . .”
Unz needs a yawn button.
Off topic, but the nastiest incident in cricket was the decision to bowl a gentle underarm delivery at the end of a one-day game between Australia and New Zealand. What is most unfortunate is that it was completely unnecessary, as the Melbourne Cricket Ground is the biggest cricket venue in the world, and a batsman as poor as McKechnie had almost zero chance of hitting the ball over the fence for the six runs required for a tie. No sixes had been hit in the game up to that point.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TtaWtAxHVsw&ab_channel=cricket.com.au
OT — Unz sells bumper stickers to Michigan kulaks?
How long an exit ramp will Mr. Sailer be allowed to run here?
I know you are a Biden admirer, but I think we can all agree that the sniffing thing is a bridge too far.
Talking about money…Whitey Ford’s postseason record is mediocre 10-8.
If you compare the regular season numbers to the postseason numbers, Schilling was money. Ford actually underperformed.
How many instances of kitchen staff seasoning diners’ lunches with gooey spittle before total colonization
werewas* justified? If you’re close enough to smell them, it’s not segregation. It’s hierarchical integration.Any surprise that life expectancy and other health indices were lower among whites with many black neighbors? Still are.
*NB: I’m not correcting your grammar, just switching out of your more theoretical subjunctive. Derb can explain it better than I.
Ha nice! I played linebacker and tight end in football, wrestled, and never felt I was in danger as opposed to playing baseball…or even softball. Some baseball playing friends of mine didn’t like the physical contact of football which always surprised me but to each his own.
Ford was great and not great in WS. 61 MVP with a Cg SO. 2 starts against PIT in 60, both CG SOs. Schilling had one bad start in the WS, game 1 in 93. Toronto’s lineup was ridiculously stacked (Alomar, Henderson, Olerud, Fernandez, Devon White, Molitor, and Joe Carter) and Schilling threw a CG SO against them in game 5. Against the mighty Yankees in 01 3 starts, 21.1 IP 4ER 2BB 26K.
Completely OT, and OC (off-colour), Canadian consumers are being treated to Jesus with a black beard. Her lips could qualify for that Jim Crow museum in Big Rapids, Mich.
Below the fold for reasons of taste.
Shopper’s Lite? Beauty campaign featuring feminized Christ-like portrait draws backlash”
Indeed, just to make a hadran on iSteve themes, HOF voting has become the sporting equivalent of ‘family reunification immigration’. I.e., it functions as a one way ratchet to lower the average human capital involved. Every Jim Rice brings in his wake a Harold Baines; lather, rinse, repeat and we arrive at our Hall of the Pretty Good.
“which practice results in more White babies as a percent of the population going forward, increasing births by the current population (Vance policy)”
Can you f— read? Vance clearly stated “I want more babies in the United States Of America”. NOTICE he did not say “white babies”. NOTICE he did not say offer a stipulation like “except babies who of a mixed race”. Furthermore, why are you endorsing the policies of a race mixer like Vance?And, of all women, a f— Hindu, the Jews of South Asia, right? Or so I’ve been told by the posters here on this fine opinion webzine.
Your southron ancestors are rolling in their graves. Pathetic.
Clearly, you are NOT a believer in rationalism, as you blindly assume that today’s American businesses are being “robbed blind” as a result of the dismantling of Jim Crow. Blame the southrons way back in the day for outright refusing to abide by the “separate but equal” doctrine as espoused in the Plessy decision. If you want to talk about being “robbed blind”, it was the patently offensive manner by which the rights/liberties of southern blacks were
? Why would we need Jim Crow here?
No blacks, you see.
Maddux’s major league debut is available on YT – Astros at Cubs (WGN) 9/2/86. He was the last player available to pitch the 18th in a game continued from the previous day, darkness. What happened next did not presage a HOF career.
Exactly, so Schilling wasn’t perfect in all his WS. Ford wasn’t either, but as he was viewed as the best starter on one of the greatest dynasties in the 20th century, well, it’s like comparing an above average pitcher to one who is considered among the greatest to have ever played the game during his era. Viewed with the full context, it’s not a difficult call to make.
“If you compare the regular season numbers to the postseason numbers, Schilling was money. Ford actually underperformed.”
Let’s talk about the regular season numbers, since that’s like, 99% of a P’s career, or what is the vast majority of making his case why one should be in Cooperstown.
Ford won the Cy Young Award (back when both leagues competed for the award), Schilling won the Cy Young Award zero times.
Curt Schilling’s career ERA = 3.47
Whitey Ford’s career ERA = 2.75
Curt Schilling’s career W total = 216
Whitey Ford’s career W total = 236 (and Ford missed two prime seasons due to serving in Korean War)
So two major stats, ERA and W’s, including one P winning the Cy Young Award and the other P not winning it ever, and Schilling comes up short to Ford (during regular season).
Examples of all time greats underperforming in WS…
Willie Mays career WS batting average was .239, 6 RBI’s and 0 HRs.
Ted Williams had a . 200 batting average with 5 hits, an RBI and 2 runs scored in 7 games in the World Series in his career
Boy that really sucks, for two of the all time greatest to have ever played the game, let’s take these dudes out of Cooperstown–oh wait, it’s about the entire career, and not just a few games that decide ultimate induction.
Lol
And we’re done here
With the final rejoinder…
In today’s MLB era, where batters constantly and continually strike out, and amass seasons of 100 + SO’s per season, it is definitely more doable for a strikeout based pitcher, who hangs around awhile, and is considered quite dominant for well over a decade to amass 3k career strikeouts over one’s career. Prior to 1970’s-80’s, when MLB pitchers started to record 3k career SO’s, only Walter Johnson amassed over 3k SO’s for a career. After Johnson, it took 50 years for the second MLB pitcher to amass 3k SO’s for his career (Gibson). It took an additional ten yrs before Johnson’s career SO record was passed (Nolan Ryan, in 1983).
Since 1973, 18 additional pitchers have amassed 3k SO’s for a career. 18 MLB pitchers in a fifty year span. What changed? The rate of batters striking out as opposed to Walter Johnson’s time (1900-1930, when batters striking out was relatively a rare occurrence).
While 300 career W’s is a challenge (just as it has always been) it can be done, just as it has been done for well over a century, and, barring something in the crystal ball that is totally unforeseen by anyone, it will occur yet again sometime in the future.
Don’t know if Walter Johnson was “nasty” or “nice” on Santa’s/Steve’s list, but you can hear his voice here, about a minute and a half into it:
https://ghostsofdc.org/2014/02/12/what-did-walter-johnsons-voice-sound-like-listen-to-this-1939-senators-broadcast/
Now there are no more “Senators” or “Indians”. Sad.
” It isn’t a particularly difficult stat to reach over a career. ”
If that’s the case then it shouldn’t be a factor in HOF consideration.
Difficult enough, but not impossible. Of the two stats, it’s becoming relatively easier to record 3k SO’s over a career since many batters in MLB
SO more than 100 times per season.
Since over the last half century there have been close to 20 pitchers who have 3k+ SO’s for a career, that stat appears more attainable for pitchers as opposed to getting 300 wins, especially since most MLB hitters strikeout more then 100 SO’s per season. Since winning 300 games appears to be a harder career stat to attain (but not impossible) W’s are of a greater factor than SO’s since fewer pitchers are attaining that stat. Even though for most of MLB’s history most of the greatest pitchers of all time managed to record the 300 W stat (most, but not all).
If only.
And until then, per your logic, no other starting pitchers will belong in the HOF. Except maybe Verlander, if he manages another 38 wins.
That’s the whole point of WAR, it enables comparisons of players within their context, which has varied considerably over the past 125 years. A closely related idea is to use Z-scores for various player stats. If a guy is several SDs better than his peers, he’s probably worth considering for the HOF. I don’t know exactly where the cutoff points should be, but that can be estimated from the historical record. But your main point is right–we may never see another career 300-game winner in the next 50 years, if ever. It’s ridiculous to say that, therefore, no pitchers should qualify for the HOF.
“And until then, per your logic, no other starting pitchers will belong in the HOF. Except maybe Verlander, if he manages another 38 wins.“
And the light bulb went off, I do believe he gets it.
The one stat that has defined MLB starting pitchers for over 130 years is games won. No matter the era, the one stat that’s comparable and can be looked at across generations is games won.
ERA is another stat up there as well, but since the lively ball era and with offenses getting more and more breaks rule changes, bringing the OF fences and power alleys closer to help benefit hitters, obviously ERA’s aren’t going to be what they once were a century ago. Thus allowances have to be made for pitchers who have ERA below 4.00; wouldn’t be surprising if in a decade from now a starter who’s considered great and dominant is below 5.00.
Since the 60s at least, the strikeout has proliferated among hitters, with many having 100+ per season, and thus more and more pitchers accumulate SO’s over their career as opposed to their historical counterparts (when strikeouts were relatively a rare thing).
But the ONE stat that IS comparable across generations—remains games won.
Imagine arguing that winning games is no big deal, or, that it’s way too difficult to attain when for over a century it was not only done but was considered to be a major hallmark, an indicator of how great and dominant a pitcher in MLB was.
Not very impressed that Walter Johnson has 3,509 K’s; AM impressed that he won 417 games.
Nolan Ryan has the all time SO record with over 5,700K; he won 323 games (though he only won 20games in a season twice in his career and never won the Cy Young Award—perhaps due to his relatively lower W during his prime seasons).
Steve Carlton’s Cy Young Award season in 1972 he won 27 games; PHI won just 59 games the entire season. That’s how valuable and difference maker a pitcher can be to his team—he wins games.
If sports isn’t primarily about winning—then the individual doesn’t understand sports.
Verlander, Scherzer, and Kershaw are obviously Hall of Fame Pitchers. I’d vote for Greinke too, who was an excellent hitter and fielder as well as pitcher.
The more recent generation is more up in the air. We’ll see.
Do you factor in Ford played for the fucking Yankees? Schilling for the 92-00 Phillies. Garbage teams other than 93. Team never reached 80 wins in those 8 seasons. Schilling isn’t in HOF for 1 reason only.
Phillies are my all-time favorite team. But Carlton winning 27 or 22 or 17 for a shitty team isn’t really relevant. The team still sucked. He followed up with a 13-20 record in 1973. Ken Brett and Wayne Twitchell were better pitchers that season. Team won 71 games. His 1977 and 1980 teams made the playoffs and partially due to him. 1977 NLCS 0-1 (2 GS) 6.94 ERA. Carlton, to his credit, did have a great 1980 post season. However, he was an average post season guy. 2 rings (one as a key guy, the other 67 STL not so much). Carlton wasn’t well liked by sportswriters and vice versa, but we didn’t have social media. Schilling isn’t in the Hall for one reason only. Schilling is still playoffs money, regardless of what a bunch of homo sportswriters think.
Agreed. They are all HOF’ers, as is Schilling. Though of the four, only Verlander has a shot at 300 wins.
Jumbo Ozaki (and his 2,000 word posts) seems unaware of stats such as WAR, WPA, etc.
Compare Vida Blue to Catfish Hunter, there isn’t much difference in their Win-Loss count and their ERA is nearly identical. Hunter is in the HOF and Blue is not. Hunter was good and he had quite a 5 year run but was he HOF material? Imo, no. World Series rings are fine but the HOF is about individual achievements.
Other than Joe Niekro has there been a pitcher that won over 200 games and also lost over 200 games. Not counting the Cy Young or Walter Johnsons who had over 200 losses but a couple hundred more wins but someone’s who had nearly the same number of wins vs. losses and won at least 200 games. Tried Wilbur Wood but no dice. Brother Phil was 318-274, so he had a shot at the 300-300 club.
“But Carlton winning 27 or 22 or 17 for a shitty team isn’t really relevant”
Correction. Uh, it’s damn fucking relevant. IF Carlton didn’t pitch for PHI in 72, its more than likely that most of those 27 W’s that Carlton won wouldn’t have been won–and the 62 Mets record (at the time) would’ve been surpassed by the 72 Phillies.
“Carlton wasn’t well liked by sportswriters and vice versa”
But the sportswriters recognized his greatness. That’s how it works. 4,100+ SO’s, 329 W’s, 3.22 ERA, 4 Cy Young Awards.
IF PHI is your all time favorite team, then Carlton, as PHI’s all time greatest southpaw pitcher, should be among your top PHI pitchers, bar none.
Not putting Curt Schilling and Steve Carlton in the same sentence. Carlton is one of the greatest pitchers to have ever played in MLB, and the other is a very excellent and good pitcher, and that’s it.
Postseason records are a good metric, but they aren’t a career. By that measure, Mays and Ted Williams, who had poor postseason stats shouldn’t be in the HOF. A player can only contribute to a teams getting to the postseason (which 100% depends on the regular season, duh); after that, it’s anyone’s game as to who will step up and have amazing stats in the postseason. Bobby Richardson was the MVP of the 1960 WS (only player to win WS MVP for losing team). Is Bobby Richardson in the HOF?
Example: Freddy Freeman was MVP of 2024 WS. Did Freeman’s regular season totals compare with Ohtani? Of course not. Can’t predict who steps up in the postseason, and who doesn’t.
And you seem to be unaware of games won. That’s a major stat and has been so for over a century. Why should the HOF dumb down the inductions and put in second tier levels? Oh, cause the WAR which is what—WINS above replacement.
So I’m getting really tired of you MFCS’s mocking. Especially when you toss a major world salad like, “WAR is sooo important, but..WINNING GAMES is no big deal at all.” Kamala Harris would be jealous of that world salad spewing out yer mouth.
That is such a dumbassery thing.
Cause IF you say that winning games is important, and then the rejoinder is “Ok, so the benchmark is 300 career Win’s, which is basically has been for several decades now” and then it’s suddenly “Ooohhh noooo, that’s WAY TOO HARD A STAT to reach. Couldn’t possibly ever reach THAT ONE.”
But then the word salad continues with “Wins above replacement, which means a pitcher truly is dominant if he wins games, and the value he has to his team.”
So winning games. Over a career.
As in 300 W’s per career?
Crickets chirping, cause it shows that some pitchers aren’t truly all that dominant over a career. Otherwise they’d have attained the career stat (like their historical counterparts did all down through the decades of MLB).
“Scherzer, and Kershaw are obviously Hall of Fame Pitchers.”
Have to be consistent. IF they are as dominant and can be compared to their historical counterparts, then winning 300 games shouldn’t be so difficult for them to attain. They’re very good, even excellent. Can they reach 300 W’s? If not, why not? That’s a fair question.
“I’d vote for Greinke too, who was an excellent hitter and fielder as well as pitcher.”
Oh for goodness sakes, Steve.
Yeah, hitting and fielding, that’s exactly the things one primarily expects from a dominant pitcher.
“Do you factor in Ford played for the fucking Yankees? ”
Do you factor in that HOF Walter Johnson pitched for the fucking Senators (who didn’t win shit for Johnson’s first 17 yrs). See, the great ones still get it done. Johnson pitched for mediocre teams for most of his career, and STILL he won over 400 games. Carlton pitched for some very inferior PHI teams as well until they started to get better. There were many years that Nolan Ryan pitched for mediocre teams as well.
This makes my point even more. The great ones manage to still get it done on a personal stats level.
“Schilling for the 92-00 Phillies. Garbage teams other than 93. Team never reached 80 wins in those 8 seasons. ”
Johnson’s Senators had similar fates during 1907-23. You don’t get bonus points for playing for mediocre teams.
AND…Schilling could’ve used free agency and gone elsewhere if he wanted to during that time. Unlike Johnson when free agency didn’t exist.
“Schilling isn’t in HOF for 1 reason only.”
Cause he doesnt have 300 Wins, no Cy Young Awards. Close, no cigar.
Why not? One reason pitcher Walter Johnson won so many games was because he was about as good a hitter as the average shortstop of his era. He was MVP in 1924 at age 36 when he hit .283 and had another 20 win season at age 37 when he hit .433. His batting probably won him and extra 20 or 30 or so games over his career.
Zach Greinke was a fabulous fielder of bunts, by some accounts the best all time, and as good of a hitter as a second string shortstop. Plus he was a sensational pitcher even though he wasn’t all that mentally healthy. I quite admire that Greinke overcame his mental health problems to be one of the four best pitchers of his cohort after Verlander, Scherzer, and Kershaw.
It’s not like Freddie Freeman isn’t one of the best hitters of the current era so it was a giant surprise when he came through in the 2024 World Series. He’s not as good as Shohei Ohtani, but who is, other than Aaron Judge? Currently, Freeman has the 4th highest career Wins above replacement of position players after Trout, Betts, and his clone Goldschmidt. A couple more decent seasons and he will be a lock for the Hall of Fame.
“A couple more decent seasons and he will be a lock for the Hall of Fame.”
Decent? Seriously? That’s all it takes for the HOF? I heard the first part of the sentence. Freeman’s top five. My original point, that oftentimes some mediocre or mid players have awesome, even great postseasons remains.
For example:
Billy Martin had 12 H’s in the 53 WS
Bobby Richardson won the MVP for the 60 WS (only time a player from the losing team in the WS to win MVP). Richardson had 13 H’s in the 64 WS.
David Eckstein won the 06 MVP for STL.
These dudes aren’t in the HOF by a long shot.
Also,
Ted Williams and Willie Mays had poor WS stats. Babe Ruth had a dreadful 1922 WS as well. Yet thankfully, they’re not judged on a few games at the end of the season but for the entirety of their careers. That’s how it works.
If Freeman’s all that and then some, then it’s reasonable to expect him to have some traditional stats before he retires, like say…500+ career HR’s or 3,000 H’s to go along with that WAR.
“Probably”
is a guess, and does not directly bear either way on the facts. There’s a reason that for the most part in MLB history, pitchers batted last. Aside from legitimate hitting pitchers, like Babe Ruth and Ohtani, the others are at best, decent, but certainly not great.
Johnson won because of his fastball, great control, and was a dominant strikeout pitcher in an era where SO’s as a whole were very low (compared to today). Hitting is totally irrelevant for pitchers. Also, apparently Connie Mack ca.1905 wanted MLB to adopt an early form of the DH (because of his dominant pitchers poor hitting skills), MLB at the time turned his idea down. Even if Johnson was all that and then some with the bat, keep in mind that for most of his career he played for mediocre teams, so its a more reasonable guess that his pitching prowess kept WAS in the games and his pitching was the dominant factor in winning games.
Grover Cleveland Alexander (373 W’s) and Greg Maddux (355 W’s), Eddie Plank (305 W’s) were both considered poor hitters. Yet they’re in the HOF.
“And you seem to be unaware of games won. That’s a major stat and has been so for over a century. …”
And it is now known to contain a lot of noise making it an inferior measure of ability. For example if you want to predict a pitcher’s future win/loss record you are better off looking at his past ERA rather than at his past win/loss record.
“Cause he doesnt have 300 Wins, no Cy Young Awards. Close, no cigar.” That checks off for Jack Morris as well.
There are “wins” the statistic, and there are wins. I’m sorry you can’t tell the difference.
So stop with the interminable silly posts, Jumbo.
I didn’t write that, you did. Stop with the Jack D stuff.
I didn’t write that, you did.
This whole back and forth started by me noting that, by your standards, Max Scherzer and Clayton Kershaw are not Hall of Famers, because neither will reach 300 wins. You are defending yourself by …noting that by your standards, Scherzer and Kershaw are not HOFers. Also by your logic, Mariano Rivera is not a HOF’er, because there is no other pitching stat other than wins.
I get it, that’s what you think. I think that you’re wrong. You’re just going to have to deal with that Jumbo.
Also, try a text editor before you post. You could chop out 30% of the words and still get the message across.
You don’t like Schilling I guess. He and Lefty are nearly identical in WAR and Lefty pitched 2000 more innings.
“500+ career HR’s or 3,000 H’s to go along with that WAR.” Three that come to mind that don’t have either are McGriff, Baines, and Rolen. Freeman is better than all three.
“it is now known to contain a lot of noise making it an inferior measure of ability. ”
That’s BS. A team winning games is not an inferior measure of ability. The 27 Yankees with 110 Wins isn’t an inferior measure of their greatness.
“For example if you want to predict a pitcher’s future win/loss record you are better off looking at his past ERA rather than at his past win/loss record.”
Not necessarily. ERA’s can’t be compared across generations. After all, during the Deadball Era, for example, dominant pitchers often had ERA’s below 2.00. That looks amazing now, but that was actually fairly common among the most dominant pitchers of the time. A “mediocre” or “middling” pitcher during the Deadball Era might have a “poor” ERA of say,…2.75 or 2.90. Today that kind of ERA would get a pitcher a major megagazillion contract.
Since the Lively Ball Era (starting ca. 1920) ERA’s have changed over time, and MLB has experimented not only with the ball, but with the OF fences and poweralleys, and of course introducing the DH now in both leagues in order to raise the total runs scored per game and favor the offenses. Therefore in an offense ridden era, a dominant pitcher’s ERA is going to be high, especially compared to historical counterparts. A pitcher with an ERA under 4.00 would be considered to be dominant, whereas only 20 yrs ago or so that would be considered fairly poor.
In another decade, don’t be surprised if an ERA under 5.00 for starting pitchers will be considered fairly reasonably good, even dominant (“Well, at least it isn’t 6.00 or 7.00 like his teammates”–possible rejoinder)
So the point being that ERA’s change over time as to what is considered to be dominant and very good, especially as MLB has tinkered in the past and continues to tinker with ways on how to increase more offensive production and higher runs total/more runs scored.
If anything, winning 20 games per season is going to soon be considered a premium and definitely a most dominant pitcher.
ERA’s change throughout the generations; winning games remain
constant and the foundation the true measure of just how dominant a starting pitcher can be, just as winning games per season is vitally important to a team. More games won = a team’s chances of making the postseason are even greater.
And the lightbulb went off. Good.
“Max Scherzer and Clayton Kershaw are not Hall of Famers, because neither will reach 300 wins.”
You don’t know that. Perhaps they will reach 300 wins. After all, it’s been done before, and perhaps they’re the ones who will reach it.
Mariano Rivera is a closer, duh. I’ve been talking about starting pitchers, and that’s been it.
“There are “wins” the statistic, and there are wins.”
Wins Above Replacement, or how valuable an individual player is to his team. For starting pitchers, the most dominant pitchers, those who win the most games year after year for their teams amounts to essentially the same. Example: Walter Johnson played on some very poor mediocre teams. When he started, however, the Senators managed to win more times than they lost (yes, Johnson had a couple losing seasons, on the whole, however, he didn’t). It’s reasonable to conclude that Walter Johnson had a direct impact on his team over his career, and that his individual value WAR (166.9) was a very good thing.
So for starting pitchers, their games won stat does fairly correlate to their career WAR, especially since pitchers aren’t valued for their offensive abilities. Their defensive abilities are important, but they would still pale by comparison to the pitcher’s ability to actually…pitch in a dominant fashion. Also, the big contracts for MLB starters have traditionally gone to those who also have won a ton of games. “Do we have a chance to win the game whenever…Clemens, Carlton, Ryan, Alexander, both Johnsons, Koufax, Maddux etc etc…take the mound?” Has been the question among others that GMs ask before offering a big contract. And for the most part, the HOF pitchers have compiled tons of wins, which can only help with their career WAR as well. Obviously a pitcher’s WAR will tend to suck if they lose more games than they win.
Here’s the thing. I do edit my writing. But everyone here is different some go on and on, some don’t and others are in the middle. Really isn’t your business, nor my business regarding the length. After all, I’m sure you’ve written quite a bit on your posts over time, and,…it’s no one else’s business.
You do you.
“Three that come to mind that don’t have either are McGriff, Baines, and Rolen.”
Interesting to note that McGriff, Baines, nor Rolen were not a first ballot HOF, so apparently as time has gone on, all three players’ stats suddenly have improved post-retirement, and now they’re considered to be among the greatest to have ever played the game. But perhaps this is another example of the Veterans Committee having influence on some of the induction of three players, because, when they were first retired and first year of eligibility, they weren’t inducted unanimously (or ca.75-85% of total votes from sportswriters) as HOFers.
“Freeman is better than all three.”
Then it should be no problem for him to attain one or both career stats. Or else there’s always the Veterans Committee to help his induction, should it take 20 or 30 yrs post retirement. Just hang in there, Freddy, and the Vets will help you out, should it take longer than 10, 15, and 20 yrs post retirement. Hope that it doesn’t play out in that situation.
Because IF you turn around and say, “Well, keep in mind that Freeman was 2024 WS MVP”, that didn’t help PIT 2B Bill Mazeroski for hitting what most consider to be the greatest walk off HR in MLB history (7th game of 60 WS to win the championship) for nearly 30 yrs. And during his era, Maz was considered to be the greatest, or one of the greatest defensive fielding 2B in NL history.
Freddie Freeman hits an enormous number of doubles. He’s the active leader in doubles and has a shot at making the all-time top 10. He projects out to be a pretty average Hall of Famer, which is a good thing to be.
“And the lightbulb went off.”…that Morris is a HOF and Schilling is better than him.
Gaylord Perry was 314-265.
Good old Vida Blue…I remember his great 1971 season. He made just over the league minimum. His salary was $14 grand that year–which is equal to $108,000 now.
If nothing else, he’s the answer to a great baseball trivia question–he’s the last switch hitter in baseball to win a league MVP award.
World Series aren’t really “games at the end of the season”. They’re postseason.
Ruth had one bad WS–1922. He was in 10 WS overall and won 7. Mays was 1 for 5 in WS championships.
Ruth had a .326 WS career avg. Mays was .230–if you only look at Ruth’s 7 Yankee WS appearances–even with the bad 1922 Series–his average was .351. He never batted below .300 in the WS for NY other than 1922.
On top of that, Ruth set scoreless innings records for pitching with Boston in his WS appearances with them. 3-0 with a sub 1,00 ERA.
In short, even taking into account 1922, he’s the wrong guy to point to as being mediocre or worse in the WS. Overall, Ruth and Gehrig were among the greatest WS players ever.
Regarding your post on why today do so many zillionaires like, say, Sergey Brin of Google want to be on Trump’s good side, it’s simple—Like most corporatist elites, they favor lower taxes, deregulation and access to cheap labor,
Furthermore…
—Jonathan Taplin, director emeritus of the Annenberg Innovation Lab, captures this vision in his 2023 book “The End of Reality: How Four Billionaires Are Selling a Fantasy Future of the Metaverse, Mars, and Crypto.” Taplin outlines their dreams: Zuckerberg’s metaverse, the notion that people might spend something like seven hours a day wearing a virtual reality headset; Musk’s colonization of Mars; untraceable crypto wealth, which exists beyond the control of the state; and Thiel’s quest to reverse aging (or at least live to be 160).
The consequences of these ambitions could be profound. And while there’s not enough room here to unpack all of the potential implications, Taplin argues that they undermine foundational democratic principles, such as Thomas Jefferson’s ideal that “all men are created equal.”
In a world of transhumanism, where wealth determines lifespan and genetic advantages, equality could become meaningless.—
You’d think someone like yourself would come to NOTICE the obvious—the tech barons are in it for themselves at the expense of the regular guy and girl, and that includes you as well.
So much for family formation policies the natural way.
“You don’t like Schilling I guess. ”
Ya guessed wrong. Nothing personal. He doesn’t measure up in the key stats that have been used for HOF induction for decades.
“He and Lefty are nearly identical in WAR and Lefty pitched 2000 more innings.”
I assume you mean Carlton and Not Lefty Grove.
Schilling had about 16 shutouts during his career.
Carlton had 66 shutouts during his career.
Schilling career complete games = 80
Carlton career complete games = 254
Perhaps that’s why Carlton had more IP, cause…he pitched complete games (like dominant pitchers before him tended to do on a regular basis).
Schilling career W’s = 216
Carlton career W’s = 329 (over 100 Games Won in a career, and definitely earned as he pitched more complete games).
For those who tend to think SO’s are the be and end all of starting P’s.
Schilling career SO’s (in an an ERA where batters tend to strikeout a lot) = 3,1k
Carlton career SO’s = 4,7k (about 1,6k more than Schilling, including season with 300K’s)
Schilling never won the Cy Young Award in his career (a key marker of dominance for starting pitchers, akin to the MVP Award). Carlton won the Cy Young Award 4 times.
Sportswriters may not have liked Steve Carlton personally, but they inducted him first ballot into the HOF, and he won the Cy Young 4 times.
Who is the last switch hitter to win the AL MVP?
Vida Blue
Oooo, doubles. Well, if he has 3k career HITS, then it should be a slam dunk.
“He projects out to be a pretty average Hall of Famer”
Woah, woah, woah, hold it, hold it, hold it.
AVERAGE for the HALL….OF FAME? Like, once you’re inducted, that means that officially you’re among the greatest to ever have played the game. And…we should be able to compare players by putting each name together in the same sentence.
Is Freeman as good as….Babe Ruth? Ted Williams? Rogers Hornsby?
But see, Ohtani and Judge, IF they continue their prodigious stats, those two names WILL be placed in the same sentence. At present, I can definitely place Ohtani in the same sentence alongside Babe Ruth, and Ted Williams. And that’s what most sportswriters have made the comparison. Same thing with Judge, IF they continue their trajectories, then they are definitely the greatest of their era.
I’m pretty sure you do know this, Steve. The ESPN interview that Deion Sanders gave is correct and it stands. The greatest of the greatest names, period. That’s what the original standard was for Cooperstown. Why all of a sudden its become too hard to reach the standards that for decades most inductees were able to reach without a problem is baffling.
“which is a good thing to be.”
‘Here dude, here’s your trophy for being average second rate.’ ‘Like, totally awesome dude! Just what I’ve always wanted, to be, what my whole career was aspired to, to be just average!’
I tend to think you’re pulling the leg here.
Doubles are nice. Career Hits are even better. 600 2B’s but only 2,1k H’s ain’t cutting it, unless there’s like, 500 HR’s to go with those doubles.
If we can now dumb down the HOF with mediocre players, who while they’re in the top 1%, are nowhere near the greatest to have ever played the game…then by all means should be pushing Dave Kingman even more. Dave was in the top 1% in HR’s during his career. If the precedent is being set for just average top 1%ers and not greatest ever to have played the game, then…Kingman by all means.
“that Morris is a HOF and Schilling is better than him.”
Uh, no. That neither Morris nor Schilling should be in the HOF.
“Like most corporatist elites, they favor lower taxes, deregulation and access to cheap labor,”
Except that they already get these things from both parties. A Harris administration wouldn’t have put up any significant roadblocks to these aims. BOTH parties have sold out the working man and woman decades ago. As if to argue that the Democrats don’t have a number of billionaire donors either, is asinine and ridiculous.
Also, suggest you read some of the posts on Unz regarding how China has just beaten the US to AI and is practically giving it away, while the US is going to charge tons (and its still a ways from being completed).
This really could be the Chinese Century and not an American one.
“Taplin argues that they undermine foundational democratic principles, such as Thomas Jefferson’s ideal that “all men are created equal.”
Taplin apparently doesn’t understand the full context of Jefferson’s five words in the Declaration, which, to be fair, in the later part of the 20th century has caused so much confusion primarily among intellectuals and educators alike.
Or, to quote from Inigo Montoya regarding people using Jefferson’s five words to make some larger philosophical political point: “”You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means”
Nor Trammell, Walker, Baines, Rolen, Ozzie, Scooter, Sutter, Pee Wee, Bunning, Roberts, Gomez, L Smith, Boudreau, Lazzeri, Rice, E Martinez, Helton, Halladay, Mauer, Minoso, Oliva, Parker, and probably 25 other guys. Negro Leagues, what to do with them? Let’s see what people think when Chase Utley gets in in 4 years.
Carlton had 4100 Ks. It’s Ryan 5700, Unit 4800, Rocket 4600 and then Lefty. I recall that Carlton was ahead of Ryan in Ks after the 1983 season. But 1984 to 1988 Carlton crashed and burned, and the Ryan Express kept going.
Damn, I see you beat me to it with Vida Blue. Thanks for the stat on Gaylord Perry. The Niekro brothers broke the Perry brothers record for most total wins if I am not mistaken. Blue probably took the MVP award in 1971 because it was not an outstanding year for hitters. Bill Melton (who?, lol) led the AL with only 33 home runs and only 6 guys hit above .300.
The choice in the last election was between Trump and his supporters and Harris and her supporters. Overall, I thought the Trump team would be better than the Harris team and voted for Trump. That does not mean I agree with every single thing that Trump, Elon, Vivek, RFK Jr. etc. says. It just means I think the alternative would have been worse.
There are some commenters here who make complaints about Republican policies on topics like immigration but did not spend the same amount of time on similarly bad policies by Biden. They likely want to create dissension among conservatives in order to split apart the Republican coalition so the Democrats can get back in power.
On the important immigration issue, we have just recently started getting a large influx of Hispanic immigrants here in Indianapolis. While many of them do not seem like bad people, a lot of them do not bother to learn English, use up government benefits while paying little in taxes and seem more crime prone. I have always had a problem with people mistakenly thinking I have drugs on me and then want to buy them off me. I look like the actor James Woods, who convincingly played a drug addict in one of his movies, the Boost. Hispanics are more likely to ask me if I have drugs to sell than Whites are.
…and I was looking forward to seeing what pearls of wisdom you might have to share regarding criteria for admission to the Hall of Fame.
Nothing, since it’s not a real place.
Not in the Hall of Fame, a requirement to be on the list.
Doesn’t strike me as “curious”. The high-profile calling people Nazis isn’t something you want discredited if you engage in it.
Bobo Newsom, 1935-53.
W 211 (which is 5 games less than Curt Schilling, btw)
L 222
“When the president comes to see Ol’ Bobo pitch he ain’t gonna let him down.”
By most accounts, Newsom was a nice guy.
“If nothing else, he’s the answer to a great baseball trivia question–he’s the last switch hitter in baseball to win a league MVP award.”
Hold up.
Pete Rose won the MVP in 1973.
“World Series aren’t really “games at the end of the season”. They’re postseason.”
The point was, that WS aren’t the only or even the main metric of which to judge a player’s career. After all, Ted Williams batted .205 with one RBI and no HR’s.
“Mays was .230”
So he sucked in the WS.
Fact
Ty Cobb sucked in the WS, (compared to what else he did offensively during his career).
Another fact: There are great players who suck in the postseason, and there are players who are mediocre who have a great postseason. And of course there are great players who are great during the postseason, and sucky players who suck in the postseason.
Point being, it can’t be predicted with 100% accuracy. It happens.
“he’s the wrong guy to point to as being mediocre or worse in the WS.”
Uh, no, it was part of the point that–it can’t be predicted who will have a great postseason and who will not.
“Overall, Ruth and Gehrig were among the greatest WS players ever.”
Uh, no, both Ruth and Gehrig are among the greatest EVER to have EVER played in MLB, EVER, whether during the season or postseason it doesn’t matter.
But the original point stands. Just cause a great player over his career in MLB doesn’t automatically mean he will be great during the postseason. Doesn’t work that way.
Sometimes great players suck in the posteason, and sometimes mediocre players have great postseasons. It has happened throughout MLB history and will continue to happen.
For example: BOTH Judge and Ohtani in the 24 WS, didn’t perform up to their usual expectations of greatness. But that won’t be held against them when its time for their possible induction into HOF (assuming that they continue to remain dominant for the rest of their careers).
Just concede, the point remains.
“Nor Trammell, Walker, Baines, Rolen, Ozzie, Scooter, Sutter, Pee Wee, Bunning, Roberts, Gomez, L Smith, Boudreau, Lazzeri, Rice, E Martinez, Helton, Halladay, Mauer, Minoso, Oliva, Parker, and probably 25 other guys.”
You’re not hearing any arguments. Sounds like the lightbulb is going off again, and that’s a good thing. Point is made.
Seriously. Are the guys you’ve just named, do they really belong in the same sentence with…
Ruth, Gehrig, Cobb, Speaker, Wagner, Foxx, Mantle, Aaron, Mays, Clemente, Williams, Reggie, Schmidt, Brett (George), Henderson, both Johnsons, Young, Alexander, Mathewson, Ryan, Seaver, Carlton, just to name a few?
Answer: Not by a damn sight.
“Negro Leagues, what to do with them?”
If you take them out, then you’re a racist. Racist, racist, racist. There’s a specific reason that they’ve been inducted in the HOF, cause racism.
“Let’s see what people think when Chase Utley gets in in 4 years.”
The perceptive ones will nod and go, “Oh, okay, they’re running out of legit inductees, because of the PED era, and they’re biding their time, until they can induct legit candidates such as Pujols, Cabrera, etc”
“Carlton had 4100 Ks”
Typo (so “only” about 1,000 more K’s than Schilling, and over 100 more W’s than Schilling)
“But 1984 to 1988 Carlton crashed and burned”
It’s called age, as Carlton was about 3 yrs older than Ryan. Carlton won the 82 Cy Young Award when he was 38, which isn’t too shabby.
“and the Ryan Express kept going.”
In some interviews (but not in his book Juiced), Jose Canseco comes VERY close to implying that Nolan Ryan during the final couple yrs of his career was using PEDS. That actually would make sense, as Ryan finished up his career in TX, and Canseco went to TX in 92, so he was Ryan’s teammate in 92-93.
But then again, who’s to say that Ryan didn’t take PEDS before Canseco became his teammate? I’m NOT stating that he took PEDs throughout his career. I AM stating that for the last few years of his career..well…anything is possible and can’t be naive that even the greatest players during late 80’s and early 90’s weren’t juicing.
Certainly would definitely make sense IF it is shown that Ryan was juicing for the last few yrs of his career, and would explain how in his mid 40’s he could still pitch at a fairly dominant level.
“and the Ryan Express kept going”
Ryan’s pitching coach in TX 1989-93 was Tom House, former steroid user during the 1970’s into the 80’s. After all, by the time Ryan joined TX, there was nothing anyone could teach him about pitching, but there was something that House could help Ryan with obtaining.
And again, this would help to explain Ryan’s late career surge and why he could keep on going, (e.g. leading AL in SO’s toward end of his career while in his mid. 40’s). But since it’s Nolan Ryan the legendary pitcher, few ever ask these types of tough questions.
Right. Nolan Ryan, Brian Downing, Tom House, and steroids all seem pretty plausibly connected.
On the other hand, Ryan just turned 78 and it seems like baseball juicers aren’t dropping dead at a particularly early age, so maybe steroids use wasn’t that the unhealthy?
Right. Nolan Ryan, Tom House, and steroids seem pretty plausible.
“Except that they already get these things from both parties. A Harris administration wouldn’t have put up any significant roadblocks to these aims. BOTH parties have sold out the working man and woman decades ago.”
Absolutely. But let’s not kid ourselves. Trump is only doing these times to feed his ego. Everything for him is transactional.
“As if to argue that the Democrats don’t have a number of billionaire donors either, is asinine and ridiculous.”
That’s a strawman. Never made that argument. The point here is that Mr. Sailer is neglecting to dig deeper into the machinations of Trump’s billionaire
pals.
“Also, suggest you read some of the posts on Unz regarding how China has just beaten the US to AI and is practically giving it away, while the US is going to charge tons (and its still a ways from being completed).”
It’s a grift. Open your eyes.
https://www.fastcompany.com/91202757/weve-entered-the-ai-grift-era
https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2024/12/05/business/sam-altman-openai-nightcap
Nah, he’s interested in other types of ball games.
Or perhaps it depends upon the individual person, their health history etc.
I always did find it a bit odd that although his wins per season total seemed to remain constant, yet Ryan continued to mount 200 strikeouts per season into his mid 40’s. Granted, he played in an era where strikeouts were there for the taking (as they remain so in MKB today) but one would think that there’d have been a significant drop off in his final few seasons, much as there was a significant drop off in Carlton’s final seasons.
I saw both pitch several times during their primes and I’ll say this. If you wanted a pitcher to strikeout the side, or at least rack up tons of strikeouts in a game, no one was better than Nolan Ryan. If you wanted a pitcher to actually win the game vs the best rival, few were better than Steve Carlton.
Nolan Ryan also set the career MLB record for walks. In other words, a team could eventually get to Ryan and beat him in a game.
Why Mr Slider doesnt fully command the respect he should among MLB fans and aficionados is baffling.
Perhaps, but this only deals with the US role in AI. Mr Unz has been touting China’s serious and non-grifting attempts at developing AI as well as other technological developments. If you have serious doubts about China being able to outperform the US in technology during this century, then you should take it up with Mr Unz.
Why does Pujols get a pass with PEDs? His head size grew to Bonds size proportions and he came up with the LaRussa / McGwire Cards. There are juicers already in the Hall and more to follow.
The right answer to surly meanspirited asshole Gibson’s question was “McCarver knows a LOT about pitching, baboon.”
So stop complaining and start carrying a supply of good bud at least. We all need to supplement our income in these inflationary times.
His 76ers teams were pretty good, though. One title each with the 76ers and Lakers, and the Lakers one was past his prime. He should have won more on the 76ers.
People are talking now about how crazy the Doncic – Davis trade is (and I agree), but that’s nothing to the one where the Warriors gave up Wilt for a handful of magic beans. I think the league may have sweetened the deal for Meuli by throwing in the second #2-#3 pick that became Rick Barry, but otherwise the value back was abysmal.
I was going to say “AL MVP”, but I overrode my initial reservations and somehow thought he was the last one in either league. You’re right; I’m wrong. Sorry and thank you. One more reason for me to hate Pete Rose, which I already do.
The ironic thing is that Steve Carlton had just as monstrous a season in 1972 with PHI. He won his first Cy a young that year, but not the MVP. Blue’s 71 A’s went to the postseason (losing in three straight to BAL), while the 72 Phillies finished dead last. Carlton won about 40% of their games that season virtually single-handedly. But no MVP for him. If anyone doubts the value of starting pitcher’s Wins stats, Steve Carlton proved beyond a doubt that it’s an entirely legit stat. Without him that season, PHI could easily have lost over 125 games. His season evokes comparisons to Walter Johnson’s years with WASH.
Yet one more reason why Steve Carlton is unanimously considered to be among the greatest pitchers to have ever played the game during the 20th century.
And this is the 300th comment—how apt as in …300 Wins.
Nolan Ryan went 8-16 in 1987 and felt he should have been take seriously for the Cy Young.
My view is that Won-Loss record should matter more for Most Valuable Player award and ERA for Cy Young Award.
“Won-Loss record should matter more for Most Valuable Player award and ERA for Cy Young Award.”
But in practice, very few pitchers win the MVP.
Traditionally, dominant pitchers who had an excellent even great ERA tended to also have a solid strong even excellent W stat for the season as well.
I mean, if a pitcher has an ERA below 2.00 or 3.00 for the season, it seems likely that he should also have 20 or so wins for the season as well (or at least close to 20).
Ryan’s 87 ERA was 2.77, which is awesome, but again, it doesn’t make sense that he didn’t go 16-8, not the other way round. But then, winning games per season wasn’t what Ryan really focused on, when compared to strikeouts.
Somehow Steve Carlton managed to do both: Win games and have exceptional ERAs.
In his 72 Cy Young season, Carlton went 27-10, with an ERA of 1.97, the best in the National League. He also lead the league in SO’s…and complete games (So he won the Triple Crown of pitching–ERA SO W) Carlton won 45.8% of the Phillies’ games that season, which is a record in modern major league history.
*Carlton had 30 Complete Games in 72 (and his arm didn’t fall off). Some MLB pitchers today won’t have 30 CG’s for their entire careers. Shame.
So just like Vida Blue in 71 w/OAK, Carlton should’ve been seriously considered for the MVP. But how would that have looked, awarding the NL MVP to a player on a last place team?
I’m sorry, I still think that W’s is one of the defining stats for starting pitchers. ERA’s change throughout the decades, and so do SO’s. But the W stat remains the one constant stat for starting pitchers, and for the most part in MLB’s history they can be compared across eras–are they winning the majority of their starts?
Example: during the Dead Ball Era, plenty of the dominant pitchers racked up season ERA’s below 2.00, or around 2.00. Starting in the 1920’s with the Lively Ball Era, that kind of low ERA’s across the board for dominant pitchers wouldn’t be seen again until the mid 60’s, when MLB raised the strike zone. But, once MLB lowered or shrunk the strike zone back to it’s pre-62 levels, once again, ERA’s began to shoot up again. Whereas today it’s getting fairly rare for a starting pitcher to post an ERA below 2.00, and even 2.75-2.90 is getting pretty rare as well. It does still happen on occasion, but across the board in MLB? If anything, MLB wants more offensive output and don’t be surprised if over time, what’s considered a dominant ERA for a pitcher is above 3.50, and above 4.00, and who knows, perhaps one day a dominant ERA will be around 5.00. [Grover Cleveland Alexander’s career ERA 2.56 while certainly dominant today, wasn’t as amazing as some of his Dead Ball counterparts, perhaps because he pitched into the Lively Ball era as offense production went up and thus so too did pitcher’s ERA’s]
But just as ERA’s across the board were fairly low back in the Dead Ball Era (since MLB’s games across the board were low scoring affairs), it evened out because few pitchers (aside from Walter Johnson and occasionally another pitcher) recorded 300 strikeouts per season. Even a pitcher recording 200-250 strikeouts was considered extraordinary, since most batters weren’t striking out 100+ times per season. And of course, for most of the 20th century, starting pitchers tended to pitch more innings per season than they do during the 21st century. It’s almost like, today’s Cy Young award winners are winning awards by doing half the work (oftentimes not even pitching 200 innings per season) of their historical counterparts.
So both ERA’s and SO’s have changed across the eras and aren’t always the most accurate stat to compare across eras. But with Wins for starting pitchers? We definitely can compare that stat.
For relief pitchers, absolutely, its definitely possible that several can rack up tons of Saves and yet “blow it” in extra innings, hence why several of them tend to lose more games than win during their season, even though their ERA might be very low.
But one could also make a case that for an ERA to be fully effective, only a starting pitcher’s ERA should be considered for a Cy Young based on total innings pitched per season. After all, a starter tends to pitch more innings than a reliever in the course of a season (even though the reliever will pitch in more games per season, but yet pitch fewer innings). But at the same time, the idea that ERA is everything and Wins are nothing is baffling, when for over a century the W stat was the stat for starting pitchers.
Sabermetricians have written volumes explaining that a pitcher’s W-L record is a very noisy stat that depends, not only on the pitcher’s efforts, but also on a lot of other things for which he is not responsible. It is not a useless stat, but it does not have the all-consuming importance you seem to believe it has.
Another thing you seem to point out only selectively, stats have to be analyzed within their context. A 20-game winner today is extraordinary because of the revolution in pitcher usage. A 20-game winner 60 years ago was just very good that season. A .300 hitter in 1968 was outstanding. A .300 hitter at the height of the steroid era was just having a good season. And there are countless other examples.
Cone had a better career than some in the HOF. And some who aren’t in had a better career than Koufax. The hall is a complete joke because they let journo scum control it.
Then that would include perhaps players like Nolan Ryan, names not normally associated with juicing.
So go ahead, name some players who are suspected of juicing during careers that are now in the HOF.
See? Not so easy a task. Because of the shadow cast upon the sport, pretty much going forward any player with prodigious stats will be suspected of juicing.
For the most part, Pujols wasn’t directly suspected like say, other players were. He flew under the radar and wasn’t directly called out in the press as a probable juicer.
But again, this would bear out that moving forward no player is above suspicion. Including say, Schilling, because by your own logic, EVERYONE is not above suspicion. Therefore since we can’t know with 100% certainty, perhaps we should have a moratorium on all HOF inductees for say, about decade, just to make sure no juicers get in accidentally.
Speaking about records and data, you’re a stats guy, right? Don’t you rely in part on government information? Any comment?
https://slate.com/business/2025/02/donald-trump-data-deletion-jobs-report-economy-public-health.html
I’m guessing the everybody who put up huge numbers around 2000 was on something.
Some may have been doing more than others and perhaps they tended to get caught.
Steroid use in MLB most likely began in the 1970’s, just like it did in the NFL. (Reggie Jackson, anyone?) The difference is it was a relatively brand new “drug” and users were likely more cautious, not knowing how to maximize the benefits and minimize risks. Amphetamine use was common going back to the 40’s/50’s and maybe earlier, and the ability to hyper focus might have been a bigger advantage than just pure strength. It’s interesting how one is literally the worst thing ever, and the other is just well, you know um, look! A squirrel is running through center field! The who/whom of sports. But narratives have to be reinforced.
Heck, even the use of chewing tobacco probably produced a mild edge in performance, but er, um, uh Tony Gwynn!
These days, there are so many newer performance enhancing products available that are impossible to detect that it’s naive to suggest it’s less widespread than during the McGuire/Bonds years. All of these guys, to include your newest hero Ohtani are using products to enhance performance. They have just learned that blowing up to look like a power lifter is probably going to attract a lot more attention and get you suspended.
But then it can also be turned around regarding a pitcher’s ERA. Having a 3.00 – 2.00 is exceptional today. Having a 3-2.00 ERA sixty (and of course during the Dead Ball Era) wasn’t a major thing, it was just okay. ERA’s also have to be taken within the context of the time. Also, unlike today, pitchers tended to pitch more innings, for well…throughout most of the entire 20th century. In 2020’s a pitcher who pitches around 200-225 innings is becoming known as a “workhorse”, whereas 30 yrs ago (and for most of the entire 20th century) that was just getting started so to speak, and wasn’t considered to be a very dominant starter. And of course, today with the role of middle innings pitchers, closers, and spot relievers, a pitcher could have a seasonal 0.95 ERA, or 1.55 ERA…and yet only pitch less than 130 innings. As closers tend to now come in to the game in the 9th inning, a closer could in fact pitch in 75-85 games, and pitch about 90-100 innings for the season. And yet have an exceptional ERA, but that ERA judged by historical context, has to be nuanced and given full context meaning…it’s not what it appears to be.
Example: LA closer Eric Gagne won the Cy Young Award in 2003. He had an ERA of 1.20. Eric only pitched 82 and 1/3 innings for 2003. Should Gagne’s 1.20 ERA be viewed vs Walter Johnson’s 1.14 ERA in 1914? Not by a damn sight.
In 1908 Ed Walsh won 40 games, ERA was 1.42, and he pitched 464 innings (that single season IP record isn’t ever gonna be broken).
In 1914, Walter Johnson went 36-7, but he also pitched 382 innings. In 1968, Bob Gibson went 22-9, 1.12 ERA, and he pitched 304 innings (with 28 complete games). In 1972 Steve Carlton pitched 346 innings with a 1.97 ERA.
Even for his 1987 season that Steve thinks Nolan Ryan should have won the Cy Young, he did pitch in 211 innings. Viewed historically, Ryan’s paltry 211 innings is meh, it isn’t all that. But at least its above 200. Not a workhorse, but it’s in the right direction.
Perhaps due to various changes regarding pitcher, MLB should set some new guidelines for Cy Young consideration. For example, NO pitcher shall be a CY candidate unless he pitches 200+ 1 innings per season. Let’s actually have them put in some actual harder work for the season.
I’m not saying that Gagne wasn’t a dominant closer. I am saying that because of the way that MLB has evolved, it is asinine to compare most closers stats across the board with starters, specifically comparing them to elite starters of the past like Walter Johnson. “Oh, Gagne had a better ERA for his best season than Walter Johnson.” That’s ridiculous. Also keep in mind that some of the most dominant closers of the more recent past started out as starters but failed. Rather than have their career end, the teams decided to put them in the role of closer, which by the 80’s and 90’s, the role was starting to gain in prominence. They caught the right wave of a new trend, so to speak.
So basically the entire closer/spot reliever/middle innings reliever(s) have thrown the whole position a bit out of whack, so to speak. Therefore ERA isn’t the most accurate metric to weigh a pitcher’s career, as well as judge them vs their historical counterparts.
Whereas across the decades, a starting pitcher’s Win total remains constant. For better or worse, a pitcher’s specific value to a team is whether or not he can help his team win individual games. One doesn’t get to the postseason, unless the team can win their games. For all of MLB’s history, the pitcher has been given the Win at the end of the game, that’s how it works. Yes, other factors come into focus, especially with the roles of closers, etc. but the pitcher who started the game and pitched the most innings of the game, gets the W or L.
One of the people who would know, or at least be able to make an educated guess would be Jose Canseco. Most of the charges he made vs specific players juicing have proven to be correct, and he would certainly know about other players. In his first book he specifically mentioned that many, many players in the early to mid 90’s were quietly asking him how to obtain steroids, what PEDS could do for their individual performances, etc.
Canseco played with 3 standout HOFers: Wade Boggs, Rickey Henderson and Nolan Ryan. When Jose stated that he had a HOF teammate who juiced, and that the name would surprise many people. Henderson I don’t think would surprise people if you look at his physique in the 90’s, like “Yeah, Rickey may have juiced a little bit” (e.g. leadoff dominant base stealer suddenly increasing his HR totals around and after age 30…hm type of thing). Wade Boggs? He was Canseco’s teammate in 98-99, at the very tail end of his career, so not very likely (not to say that Wade didn’t juice, just that he probably didn’t get them from Jose. But then again, who’s to say? Perhaps he could’ve earlier just not as a teammate).
But Canseco specifically stated that he was a teammate of a well known, dominant player, and he was a teammate of Nolan Ryan (again at the end of Ryan’s career in TX).
Also, to be blunt, for the first five seasons of his career in NY, Ryan wasn’t considered to be all that. He sometimes had to pitch in relief or as a spot reliever (and was sent down to the minors). He had control issues and walked too many batters (which he continued to do throughout his career as he set the all time walk record). Suddenly he’s traded to the Angels out in Anaheim in 72, and lights up the AL. Especially with his connection to Tom House.
Example: In his book, Canseco devotes a paragraph to Roger Clemens with a disclaimer that he doesnt know for certain IF Roger did PEDS, but then goes on to give info that belies that sentence. And, Clemens has yet to be inducted into HOF. In his second book, Canseco specifically names AROD. And AROD has yet to be inducted into HOF.
So if Canseco were to name Nolan Ryan, THAT would be considered to be a major shock throughout MLB, especially with Ryan’s publicly squeaky clean image. Jose may be waiting for Ryan to pass before making any public comment, should he ever decide to do so.
A bit OT, but apparently CA is suing Elon Musk’s DOGE for having access to Americans’ personal data. How exactly is this different than the statistician Raj Chetty, whom you frequently mention? Didn’t Chetty gain access to millions of Americans’ private information to use in his research? I mean, is there a difference between what Musk is attempting and what Chetty has done?
“I’m guessing the everybody who put up huge numbers around 2000 was on something.”
Guessing, right. You don’t know.
“Some may have been doing more than others and perhaps they tended to get caught.”
Speaking of getting caught. I thought privacy and doxxing were a big deal to you. You know, law/order and the rule of law stuff.
—A federal judge issued an emergency order early Saturday prohibiting Elon Musk’s U.S. DOGE Service from accessing personal and financial data on millions of Americans kept at the Treasury Department, noting the possibility for irreparable harm.
…
The ruling came hours after attorneys general from 19 states sued to stop Musk’s team from dealing with sensitive files during its review of federal payment systems — an unprecedented effort that skirted firm security measures that permitted access to systems only to trained Treasury employees.
In a four-page order, Engelmayer said the states that sued the Trump administration “will face irreparable harm in the absence of injunctive relief.”
“That is both because of the risk that the new policy presents of the disclosure of sensitive and confidential information and the heightened risk that the systems in question will be more vulnerable than before to hacking,” Engelmayer wrote.
He adopted arguments by the states that Treasury records from the agency’s Bureau of Fiscal Services can only legally be accessed by specialized civil servants “with a need for access to perform their job duties.”—
At the same time, statistician (and Hillary Clinton supporter) Raj Chetty had direct access to millions of US taxpayers files in the 2010’s, and no one sued to prevent Chetty from accessing the files of millions of Americans. At the time, Chetty was not a US civil servant, but was conducting research for…some private project of his that was given consent by government officials. But technically speaking, DODGE isn’t any different than Chetty. If DODGE can’t look at classified information on millions of US citizens, then by extension, Chetty shouldn’t have been given access to classified information on millions of US citizens.
“Guessing, right. You don’t know.”
And neither do you, especially since sports isn’t your expertise, and you may not be familiar with the PEDS controversy in MLB over the last 30 yrs.
Nolan Ryan took his conditioning seriously but I don’t suspect he used PEDs, just followed at fitness regime and took care of himself.
I remember Greg Luzinski of the Phillies, I don’t even know if he lifted much less take steroids but that guy was a bull.
“Steroid use in MLB most likely began in the 1970’s, just like it did in the NFL. (Reggie Jackson, anyone?) ”
Uh no. Steroid use in MLB began in earnest during the mid to late 80’s, when Jose Canseco really got the ball rolling by showing exactly what an A list calibre MLBer could do with PEDS (e.g. first 40-40 man in baseball).
Up to that point, PED useage in baseball was extremely rare. It’s nice to be the cynical crank who suggests that “Everyone used to do it”, but where’s the proof? Oh that’s right, it’s not there.
Mind you, it’s very possible if not probable that a few here and there MLBers were juicing in the 70’s, but widespread? Nah. There’d have been some hints about it at the time the way it was in the mid to late 80’s.
Reggie’s stats weren’t anything unique, except for being in the top 1% of the top 1% to have ever played the game.
Amphetamine use was common going back to the 40’s/50’s and maybe earlier”
Boy you’re just blowing smoke out your butt here aren’t you? Amphetamines weren’t a thing in MLB until late 5o’s/early 60’s. The reason they were adopted was pretty much tied to the jet age, as well as the expanded season from 154 to 162, as well as increased night games. So basically players were expected to play several night games in a row, then perhaps a couple of double headers, and all the while jet hopping from cities to cities (train travel was much easier on the system). Greenies were initially used as a coping mechanism to get through the extended gruel of longer seasons coupled with plane travel which could wreck havoc on the system. But this idea that greenies were some wonderdrug that caused BA’s RBI’s W’s and HR totals across the board to skyrocket is total bogus.
“These days, there are so many newer performance enhancing products available that are impossible to detect that it’s naive to suggest it’s less widespread than during the McGuire/Bonds years. ”
Agreed. This part is totally legit. HGH, for example, works likes steroids and there aren’t tests that can detect it with 100% accuracy.
“Nolan Ryan took his conditioning seriously but I don’t suspect he used PEDs, just followed at fitness regime and took care of himself.”
Surrrre he did. For his first 5 seasons in MLB, nothing in Nolan Ryan’s career would suggest that he became the pitcher that he later became. Like, in nearly all the greatest of the greatest MLB pitchers, you can see the stats somewhere in there within their first few seasons.
A fitness regime and soaking his pitching arm in pickle brime (!) isn’t enough to suddenly post 383 SO’s in 1973. IF he were all that nd then some during his first five seasons, the Mets would’ve held on to him.
Ryan was teammates with HOF P Tom Seaver and good pitcher Jerry Koosman (as well as John Matlack). The Mets really blew it by not holding onto Ryan. But then up to that point, he hadn’t shown them anything as to why they should have kept him, which is one reason he had been sent down to the minors for a season in the late 60’s.
That and his association with John House (in later years, but who’s to say earlier).
If anything, Nolan Ryan provides a textbook example of what a possible suspected juicer would look like. A pitcher goes from being a jabrone, ham and egger, who’s been sent down to the minors, traded to some second rate outfit like ANA, and then suddenly out of nowhere lights up the AL with strikeouts and decent posting ERA? He kinda slips under the radar, but using PEDS in the early 70’s, when his career was on the line, he had something to prove, and willing to try anything to make an impact in MLB…actually makes a whole lotta sense.
Someone really should get around to asking Jose Canseco what he thinks about Nolan Ryan, if he thinks he used PEDS.
“At the same time, statistician (and Hillary Clinton supporter) Raj Chetty had direct access to millions of US taxpayers files in the 2010’s, and no one sued to prevent Chetty from accessing the files of millions of Americans.”
Not an analogous situation. Chettty is a researcher. DOGE is not. Chetty followed strict procedures**. DOGE creates them as they go along. Chettty is honest and was thanked by Mr. Sailer. Would our resident pattern NOTICER approve of this conduct?***. My vague impression is no. Do you?
https://www.science.org/content/article/how-two-economists-got-direct-access-irs-tax-records
—**A research solicitation that IRS issued in the fall of 2011 attracted 51 proposals, according to Barry Johnson, head of the special studies branch of the Statistics of Income division. Some 19 were accepted, Johnson says, and 16 studies were actually carried out. And the vast majority of researchers supported by the IRS were required to follow a protocol that allowed them to use the information without actually handling the microdata itself.
“We were given a dummy data set, with random numbers, to test our program,” explains David Grusky, a sociologist at Stanford University in California and director of its Center on Poverty and Inequality. “Once we’re confident the program is working, we ship it off to the IRS and someone there does the run. After checking to make sure no confidential information is included, they send the output back to us. And we shuffle back and forth until the project is done. It’s a little cumbersome, but it works.”—
https://www.wired.com/story/treasury-department-doge-marko-elez-access/
***As WIRED has reported, Elez was granted privileges including the ability to not just read but write code on two of the most sensitive systems in the US government: the Payment Automation Manager (PAM) and Secure Payment System (SPS) at the Bureau of the Fiscal Service (BFS), an agency that according to Treasury records paid out $5.45 trillion in fiscal year 2024. Reporting from Talking Points Memo confirmed that Treasury employees were concerned that Elez had already made “extensive changes” to code within the Treasury system. The payments processed by BFS include federal tax returns, Social Security benefits, Supplemental Security Income benefits, and veteran’s pay.—
“If DODGE can’t look at classified information on millions of US citizens, then by extension, Chetty shouldn’t have been given access to classified information on millions of US citizens.”
So then by your own logic, you agree with me that DOGE is in the wrong. Thanks.
“And neither do you, especially since sports isn’t your expertise”
I know more than you care to admit.
“and you may not be familiar with the PEDS controversy in MLB over the last 30 yrs.”
Lived through it, friend.
Bagwell, Beltre, Ortiz…
“Uh no. Steroid use in MLB began in earnest during the mid to late 80’s, when Jose Canseco really got the ball rolling by showing exactly what an A list calibre MLBer could do with PEDS (e.g. first 40-40 man in baseball).”
Uh, yes. “Beginning in earnest” isn’t the same as beginning. You’re out of your depth on the subject of PED’s and their history in sports in general, and I would recommend you actually attempt to learn something that you don’t know much about.
But, you being you, you think you know everything and have nothing left to learn.
Amphetamines weren’t a thing in MLB until late 5o’s/early 60’s. ”
For sake of argument let’s say that’s true. It’s doesn’t discredit my point and you spend the next hundred words making excuses for its use. Blowing smoke out of your ass indeed.
HGH is old hat, pal. Do some research into things like peptides, or EPO.
“Up to that point, PED useage in baseball was extremely rare. It’s nice to be the cynical crank who suggests that “Everyone used to do it””
And I never said this, you dishonest jagoff. For something to be “rare” requires it to exist in the first place. Your childish obsession with sportsball requires you to defend some golden, innocent age of MLB that simply never existed. Cheating has been a part of the game since the beginning. You’re just attempting to argue that some forms of cheating are more honest than others. LOL
And where’s the proof it was rare? Amphetamines are a PED, and you already admitted (along with voluminous justification) that they were being used since the 50’s. Pain meds are also a PED, and those go back who knows how far.
You’re not hearing any arguments with those specific players. Why exactly DH David Ortiz? Over 500 + career HR’s, which is a legit stat. The rumors never directly rose to the level of actual substantiated charges, and so…induction. Right or wrong, you do need some actual proof.
But what about Ken Griffey Jr? Always considered the clean one, but who is to say for certain?
Another reason there should be a total moratorium on all HOF inductees for about a decade, until MLB can sort it all out and do an indepth investigation. Perhaps with traditional stats weighed with Sabermetrics and judge various new possible inductees stats weighed vs traditional stats of players from back in the day, (e.g. when exactly PEDS effects may have kicked in, etc). Another method: with nearly 90 yrs of inductees, the HOF now has a substantial number of players with career arcs that can be weighed and judged alongside possible new inductees. Compare, contrast, and then decide PEDS or NON-PEDS? Then go from there.
“But the training methods today are so much improved”–not to a certain level they’re not.
Give it about a decade to be sorted out, and then go from there.
Ryan started out as a 19 year old in 1966. He was with the Mets from 1966, 1968-1971, was a spot starter but still averaging about a strikeout per inning. I had no idea that Ryan lost so many games, he was even closer to Phil Niekro for the 300-300 club. Ryan finished at 324-292, like Niekro, Ryan had the misfortune of playing with some awful teams, his lifetime 3.19 era for that many years, innings and games, and era he pitched ( into the late eighties and early nineties) is very good. The 5,714 strikeouts will probably always stand. Ryan was young and used sparingly with the Mets in the late 1960s/early 1970s, the Mets starting rotation was Seaver and Koosman, and whoever whether it be someone like Gary Gentry or the young Nolan Ryan. Ryan retired in 1993, the steroid era would kick in later. Mark McGwire weighed 215lbs in 1993, Sammy Sosa was 185lbs. Brady Anderson didn’t sport a body like Frank Shamrock until 1996-1997. Anderson weighed about 165lbs in 1993 after a heavy meal. Anderson at 6’1” would weigh 195-199lbs in 1996 the year he hit a then team record of 50 home runs.
Steroids have been around for a long time. Way before the 1960s but the first American athlete who vastly improved in his sport by using steroids that I at least know about was Olympic weightlifter Bill March. March would credit his form of isometric exercise for his gains in strength. Lol. March would take a lighter weight using a power rack and say in the overhead press ( different positions of the lift) and press it against the pins. This isn’t all bad but the reason for most of March’s improvements in the early 1960s were drugs not isometrics. This just so happened to reboot isometrics as a training tool. I don’t know if anyone prior to the 1990s used steroids in baseball but I highly doubt it. Guys like Aaron, Mays, and despite his muscles, Mantle were all average sized men. These guys hit a ton of more home runs than a giant like Frank Howard or a bull like Greg Luzinski.
“For sake of argument let’s say that’s true. It’s doesn’t discredit my point ”
It means your point wasn’t accurate. The idea that amphetamines were used in the 30’s is asinine. (you stated used in the 40’s or even earlier). No proof of that.
“you think you know everything and have nothing left to learn.”
Pot calling kettle. Seriously, everyone has things that they still need to learn, like duh.
“You’re out of your depth on the subject of PED’s and their history in sports in general”
No, we’re only talking about PED usage in MLB. Various NFL teams in the late 50’s/early 60’s were using them, and of course the US, and Soviet Olympic teams started using them at least since the mid. 50’s, perhaps as early as the early 50’s. That’s the standard historical narrative.
In Lance Williams/Mark Fainaru Wada’s Game of Shadows, Charlie Francis, “Charlie the Chemist”, Canadian Olympic Team coach is quoted as stating that the ancient Greek olympians in the 8th century BC used to eat sheep’s testicles to raise their testosterone levels. Whether that technically counts as PED usage can be left to others to decide.
It is terrible that “peptides” has become shorthand for:
https://www.usada.org/spirit-of-sport/6-things-know-peptide-hormones/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peptide
“HGH is old hat, pal. Do some research into things like peptides, or EPO.”
It was an example, throwaway line, asshole. And you know that. Victor Conte of BALCO lab was among the promoters of EPO for his various clients, particularly for Olympic sprinter Marian Jones.
“And I never said this, you dishonest jagoff. ”
Yeah, ya did ya lying MFCSer.
“For something to be “rare” requires it to exist in the first place.”
Exist, but not widespread. My point is been constant: PEDS were not widespread in MLB, or used in any significance, until the mid to late 80’s. Jose Canseco is widely credited to have brought PEDS into MLB’s mainstream–because he was the first MLBer to actually have a dominant season (MVP, first 40-40 man) then other players started to use them.
I also stated that its very possible that Nolan Ryan could’ve used PEDS, just that he didn’t broadcast that fact, and at the time, few if any players in MLB followed his example. Also at the time of his possible usage in the early 70’s, Ryan was seen as a second rate pitcher (UNTIL his breakout season in 72 with ANA).
“Cheating has been a part of the game since the beginning.”
Duh.
“You’re just attempting to argue that some forms of cheating are more honest than others”
Some forms are more honest, definitely. It’s when everyone started using chemicals to enhance their performance, yeah, that’s taking it to another whole level. Whether a pitcher spit on the ball, used an emery board to help with his breaking pitchers, or when batters used a corked bat or used pinetar, that’s a given.
It’s like, if everyone is fighting with sticks and stones, and then someone gets the idea to start using a slingshot. That’s not exactly cricket, but whatever. But THEN another fighter decides to use a machine gun, on the basis that that would help them win the fight even more (machine gun vs sticks and stones). Then THAT is what’s considered to be crossing the line over into another form of cheating. Because then to compete in the fight, those using sticks and stones decide to use grenades and bombs to even it out. And then both sides continue to rachet up the cheating, until their side wins the fight. But once the cheating has started, it can’t be put back inside the bottle.
“And where’s the proof it was rare? ”
Where’s the proof it wasn’t? For one thing, this would be reflected in the stats, since MLB players would turn to something to help increase their performance.
“Amphetamines are a PED”
No they’re not. They’re basically caffeine pills. You could get the same effect by drinking 5-7 energy drinks today, or 8 cups of expresso. They get you wired, but they’re not going to help one hit 70 HRS in a season. Unless we’re now in the realm that caffeine itself, because it’s a drug, is now considered to be a PED.
Canseco showed the difference in his book. (And no, Jose stated he never took Amphetamines as they paled by comparison to PEDS. And also, once he brought PEDS into the mainstream, that’s when Ampetamine useage went down across the board in MLB).
“Pain meds are also a PED, and those go back who knows how far”
Here’s the thing you’re missing. For the most part, for the last 40 or so years, MLB players have used PEDS in conjunction with weight training. Weight training was frowned upon in baseball up until the late 80’s, very few players worked out pre 1980’s. Yes, there were some here and there, but that doesn’t automatically mean they were juicing as well. MLB clubhouse trainers as well as the organizations discouraged weight training on the theory that it didn’t provide any benefits for onfield play. They were wrong, but that’s what most everyone thought at the time.
So “any” type of medication can be used as a PED. That’s definitely true now, but seventy eighty yrs ago? MLB players weren’t aware of that possiblity.
You stated “even earlier”. So, the idea that Ted Williams decided to take Robitussin to help him with his batting average, or that Mickey Mantle, after bellying up to the bar, decided to start taking Winstrol and Deca in 56 to help him win the Triple Crown, is asine and calling bullshit on that.
Also, in BALCO labs in the 90’s/early 2000’s, the clients were taking insulin in conjunction with a cocktail of PEDS. Insulin didn’t exist pre 1920’s, so that rules out Cobb, Speaker, Walter Johnson, ad the Dead Ball era.
So do stop with the petty bullshit of attempting to shoehorn every type of cough syrup, over the counter medication by stating “Yup, that’s a steroid.” Bullshit. It wasn’t until the 90’s, that players in conjunction with physical trainers started going over the Chemist’s Bible or various medical books to determine which drugs combined with others could help work on individual performances. Yes. Steroids were in Olympics and NFL since at least mid to late 50’s. No evidence for their useage in MLB at that time.
We now know that a couple of players here and there MAY have taken PEDS in the 70’s. Since they weren’t HOF dominant players, and didn’t really take their on field performance to another level, the majority of players avoided taking them. As soon as Canseco started taking them, AND had a dominant performance, along with Mark McGwire, that’s when PEDS became widespread in MLB, because they saw the results work on A list players.
“and you already admitted (along with voluminous justification) that they were being used since the 50’s. ”
Caffeine pills ain’t PEDS, period. They may get you high, but they don’t cause you to hit 60, 70+ HR’s in a season.
“to defend some golden, innocent age of MLB that simply never existed.”
Onfield cheating in baseball existed since day one, or at least on the first day it became professional as opposed to being played as a gentleman’s amateur club game, so..1869 was first pro team, so circa 1870’s.
Cheating by using PEDS is a relatively new occurrence in MLB, and didn’t exist until sporadically in the 70’s, and was widespread starting in the mid to late 80’s.
I wholeheartedly agree that cheatings existed since the beginning. It didn’t exist with PEDS at the time because it simply didn’t occur to the players what they could use and what PEDS could do for them.
“Ryan started out as a 19 year old in 1966. ”
Bob Feller started out as a 17 yr old in 1936, the difference is, Bob Feller was viewed as a phenom, the next Walter Johnson basically from day one.Feller had his first 20 game season in 1938, when he was 19.
“He was with the Mets from 1966, 1968-1971, was a spot starter but still averaging about a strikeout per inning. ”
The Mets never viewed him as all that. If they did, they’d have held on to him.
“I had no idea that Ryan lost so many games, he was even closer to Phil Niekro for the 300-300 club. Ryan finished at 324-292”
Thank you. Steve Carlton 329-244 had a better winning percentage. When it came to actually winning games, Ryan wasn’t very dominant, and he only won 20 or more games twice in his career.
“Ryan had the misfortune of playing with some awful teams”
Yes, but so did Walter Johnson, but his W-L is 417-279, so Johnson lost 13 fewer games than Ryan, and yet won 93 more games, and he did that in 21 seasons as opposed to Ryan’s 27.
“Ryan retired in 1993, the steroid era would kick in later.”
PED era started in earnest in mid 80’s with both Canseco and McGwire.
But if there’s one player who would’ve taken PEDS during the 70’s, it would be Nolan Ryan. He had just been traded to Angels, a mediocre team, he wasn’t yet a full starter, was viewed across the league as a second rate pitcher, had something to prove, wanted to keep his career going…makes sense that it could’ve happened. And that fact that in final years of his career he knew Tom House, who is seen as an early PED user in MLB, again, it does make sense. So perhaps Ryan used PEDS in the early 70’s, and then perhaps picked them back up in late 80’s, or ca. 1990, in order to get 300 career W, and to remain at a dominant pitching level. He was posting around 3.00 ERA in his 4o’s.
My bad. Brady Anderson wasn’t 165lbs, at least not in MLB, some other Brady. Anderson’s weight was listed at 185-86lbs and his heaviest listed weight was 202lbs. Not a big change in weight at least.
Steve Carlton and Nolan Ryan both allowed 1.24 career walks+hits per inning pitched:
https://www.baseball-reference.com/players/r/ryanno01.shtml
Caffeine and Doping—What Have We Learned since 2004
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7468986/
Ok…Shrug of shoulders.
Babe Ruth hit 59, 54, 54, and 60 HR’s in various seasons because he over drank tons of hot Joe per day. Yep. All because of Maxwell House, good to the last drop, and now we know why. Oh, and don’t forget Pepsi Cola, because that hits the spot. Nickle trickle trickle…
Ted Williams hit over .400 because he drank 12 cups of Folgers per day. I think Ted was a Coca Cola man, so Folgers + Coke and well…there you are. It’s so obvious he was juicing on caffeine!
Keep in mind, that caffeine leaves the system quicker than steroids.
“Despite the fact that the scientific evidence for performance enhancing effects of caffeine is increasing over the years,”
Some government agencies running amok on this one. What exactly are the PE Effects on MLB players, prior to when modern PEDS were invented? Zero evidence.
Basically pre 1970’s in MLB, available caffeine sources were: Amphetamines, Coffee, Tea, and Soda Pop. Yep, all that Mt Dew combined with Folgers, NO WONDER Early Wynn won 300 games and Maris passed the Babe with 61 HRs!
Oh wait a second…
The article quoted is directed focused on Olympics, and not MLB. MLB is not considered to be a strict endurance sport.
But it did provide for some good laughs, thank you for that much, it’s well appreciated.
Nolan Ryan leads all MLB with walks (2,795). Carlton is second, but by nearly a thousand behind Ryan (1,833). Just as Ryan’s SO record probably won’t be surpassed, neither will his career walks be broken any time soon either, and Ryan really did walk a lot of batters, which, would explain why he only won 20 games twice in his career. Walks add up, because additional runners on base eventually score runs which causes pitcher to lose the game.
I will say that the one thing that Carlton did worse than other MLB starters is that he committed a lot of balks, and, turns out, he leads all MLB pitchers in that category, with 90 for his career. Not sure why, but he did balk a lot on the mound for some reason (wonder if lefthanded pitchers tend to balk more than righties).
Steve Carlton had one of the odder pitching careers: he was utterly magnificent for about a half dozen seasons widely dispersed over many eyars, and somewhere between pretty good and not so hot for dozen and a half or so seasons. Most notably, he wasn’t usually all that terrific between his all-time historically awesome 1972 (age 27) and 1980 (age 35) seasons. His 1980 season was the last 300 innings pitched year in baseball history.
Carlton wound up pitching 24 seasons and posted stats that qualify him as an all time great, but he also had a number of years in which he wasn’t that good.
If he’d been healthy his entire career, he might have won 400+ games and been the obviously best pitcher ever.
But various metrics, he’s better than Nolan Ryan.
Carlton’s 1977 Cy Young winning season wasn’t shabby.
23-10, 2.64 ERA 198 SO 283 IP
Carlton’s 1982 Cy Young winning season is pretty good as well, at age 38.
23-11, 3.10 ERA 286 SO 295.2 IP
He was fairly healthy up until about 40, which was par for the course in MLB back then, actually, it was above average for the course as many players, even great ones, tended to peter out around age 35 or so.
Funny how Ryan managed to post very low ERA’s at the tail end of his career. Almost as if he was taking…
Someone should really ask Jose Canseco what he thinks about Nolan Ryan, especially as he’s been proven correct about a number of players he’s named that were connected to PEDS usage.
“Speaking about today’s pitch counts, Carlton added, “I wasn’t raised in this environment, so I think differently. These guys don’t know anything but pitch counts. I would balk at it because I don’t agree with it, but they can’t go up against it because that’s all they know. Philosophically I don’t agree with it because I think these guys are not really in shape because they don’t throw enough. You need to throw so much so the tendons, ligaments, the muscle and bone get bigger, denser, stronger to be able to handle the stress of throwing. I don’t think they throw enough. 100 pitches is not a lot. You warm up with 100 pitches. Then you throw your 200. We threw 185 pitches in a game.”
–Joyce, Greg (May 12, 2017). “Hall of Famer Steve Carlton returns to baseball for a night with IronPigs”. lehighvalleylive.com.
Nothing like a little hyperbole to make for a useful conversation.
I’ll tell you what. If you agree not to write stupid things like: “Caffeine pills ain’t PEDS, period.” I won’t call you out on your less egregious statements.
Nolan Ryan is the greatest pitcher in the history of the game. Period.
He just happened to play on quite a few mediocre TEAMS, which no pitcher can overcome.
Caffeine pills ain’t PEDS in the commonly understood definition of PEDS and has no direct effect on MLB athletic performance. Palmiero wasn’t banned from MLB because of caffeine in his failed drug test.
The idea that for last 30+ years those who were caught or suspected of juicing were primarily taking caffeine pills, OR were cocktailing PEDS with caffeine as a major component of the PEDS is asinine. Caffeine is a drug, just like alcohol and weed. Are weed and alcohol PEDS?
Uh no, they’re not. Same thing as with caffeine.
To meet you halfway, I removed the word period
Because IF you believe that f’ing bullshit, then every single MLB player who ever drank more than 2-3 cups of coffee, tea, coke, or Pepsi per day, way back in the day was a juicer.
I don’t live in conspiracy land, nor try to make up stupid shit out of my ass.
Unless you were just kidding again.
I tell ya, these millennials and zoomers gotta crazy sense of humor.
While I appreciate your efforts and your links, it’s clear we are wasting our time with Yojimbo. The guy simply wants to cling to fallacies he learned 40-50 years ago and will defend them until death, and is clearly incapable of learning anything new.
Hell, he can’t even seem to understand that there are a multitude of metrics to determine enhanced performance other than strength.
“Nolan Ryan is the greatest pitcher in the history of the game. ”
Bullshit. Not by a damn sight.
“He just happened to play on quite a few mediocre TEAMS, which no pitcher can overcome.”
Walter Johnson pitched for some mediocre TEAMS as well, BUT managed to win 93 more GAMES than Ryan. In other words, WAS sucked, but whenever Johnson pitched, most of the time won his games, which means that he had a direct impact on the game and gave his TEAM an actual legit chance to WIN (which for most part they did).
Ryan career ERA: 3.20
Walter Johnson career ERA: 2.17
Ryan career W’s: 324
Walter Johnson career W’s: 417
Do players care that much about making the HOF? Serious question.
Now that’s a lie. I’ve quoted from Game of Shadows, one of the premiere in-depth investigative books on BALCO, which at the time was one of the top labs for developing PEDS for elite athletes.
When something asinine as ”caffeine is equivalent to PEDS”, then yes, it’s time to call bulshit on that. Otherwise if it were that simple, then anyone and everyone who’s ever drank soda, coffee tea, eaten enormous amounts of chocolate, is by that strict definition, a juicer. The fact remains, that prior to the mid 50’s, when NL and Olympics were starting to take PEDS (some of which were taken in the 90’s in MLB), modern OEDS were non-existent. And they certainly weren’t a thing in MLB until the mid to late 80’s with Jose Canseco nearly single handedly responsible for bringing them into the mainstream if MLB—a fact that isn’t debatable.
I’ve already agreed that Steroids/PEDS existed in MLB in the early 70’s but weren’t widespread. Canseco made them widespread in MLB, along with weight lifting and better training methods. I’ve also said it doesn’t surprise me if it’s shown that OED usage in MLB continues in the 2020’s. That’s an unfortunate legacy of the ‘90’s -2000’s, and there’s a reason why certain retired players aren’t getting inducted into the HOF. I’ve also been consistent regarding various sub par players that have been inducted, and they shouldn’t have been.
Always willing to learn new things; just not utter bulshit, a la “since caffeine is a drug and THEREFORE automatically that must mean it’s a PED.” I understand that some nations in the world treat caffeine as more deadly than in the US, but that only serves to obfuscate the clear distinction between legitimate PEDS, or substances that can be combined with other chemicals
Because it’s a well established fact that modern PEDS weren’t being used by pro athletes until the mid to late 50’s—in the NFL (by a few teams) and also in the Olympics. Virtually the only type of substance that existed during the Dead Ball Era into 1920-50 era would’ve been caffeine, therefore it’s well to put that piece of crap down and turn the page.
When I simply asked you, WHICH players from the ‘70’s can directly be traced to PEDS, you decline to answer. Mainly because for the most part, players using PEDS pre Jose Canseco were difficult to find. They existed, but they weren’t a significant minority. If they were, their example would’ve been immediately imitated—just as dozens if not hundreds of players started to copy Canseco and McGwire’s examples when they saw the results for them.
As a gesture of reasonable good faith, I speculated that one 70’s player who would fit a profile of possible PEDS usage would be Nolan Ryan… and yet you decline to seriously engage this. I actually conceded a possible player, named a specific example, of someone who could’ve taken PEDS, which was your original speculation that PED usage in 70’s MLB was more widespread than originally thought. Yet when I simply asked for evidence and proof regarding PED usage during 79’s among MLBers, you huffed and puffed and couldn’t answer.
Again, as a sign of good faith, I named an entirely possible MLBer, and one who went on to become one of the most dominant players of his generation—and you gave no answer to that. Which is very telling. Perhaps Nolan Ryan fans don’t won’t to consider. Possible truth that’s too difficult to deal with.
There are other metrics besides strength; they didn’t exist for the most part prior to 1945 or 1950. The idea that Ruth, Cobb Speaker et al increased their on field performance directly because of a substance like caffeine is asinine. Because basically 100 yrs ago, that’s all that was readily available to them. Coffee tea and soda—yeah that’s exactly what gave them the endurance to steal 90+ bases in a season or hit .400. In that, gotta call bullshit.
Also players back then simply didn’t think about what substances they could take to get an edge. Not because they were more ethical, but because it simply didn’t occur to them to do so. For them, cheating was limited to onfield things, like extra pine tar on the bat, spitball etc.
Any one can make a statement “PEDS have always existed in sports”, I ask for proof for the first half of the 20th century, and you don’t provide any.
Maybe this is an outgrowth of just how pervasive PEDS have become in sports—everyone now assumes that they not only existed forever but that usage goes back to the beginning of the individual sports themselves an anyone who questions that narrative is viewed with suspicion. When no proof or evidence jibes with their preconceptions of earlier times then that “must mean beyond a doubt” that PEDS existed since day one in the individual sports. This is a form of conspiratorial thinking.
Carlton’s balks were a condition of his pick off move to first. It was very deceptive and could have been called more often. He had an mlb record 144 successful pick offs.
“Funny how Ryan managed to post very low ERA’s at the tail end of his career. Almost as if he was taking…”
NYM 3.58, CAL 3.07, HOU 3.13, TEX 3.43
Nearly half of his career BB were in his 8 seasons in Anaheim, yet he posted his lowest ERA totals for them.
Ryan most Ks, most No-hitters, and most 1-hitters. Tied with Big Train with 18 2-hitters. Ryan also has the lowest hits per nine innings in mlb history.
Right. There’s little evidence that PEDs were widespread in baseball until about 1993. My friend the baseball agent told me that Jose Canseco’s trade from Oakland to Texas in mid-1992 was the moment PEDs broke out from one team.
Nolan Ryan started lifting weights before his heroic 1973 season. Yet, he couldn’t convince any of his Angel teammates to lift until 1979. I assume that the teammate who agreed to lift in 1979 was Brian Downing, who turned into Clark Kent into his 30s.
Fair question. Seems as though some really do, while others not so much. So perhaps it is a wash after all.
Probably the borderline players do. After all, once they’re retired, perhaps they do want to be remembered for their on field contributions to MLB. Best way to have that is to be enshrined forever in the HOF.
I remember reading at the time that in addition to weight lifting, Nolan Ryan had a routine of which he soaked his pitching hand in pickle brine.
With the recent understanding that he knew Tom House, the pickle brine seems more like a rouse, to distract people’s attention away from a possibility that something else was going on.
As the 70’s song goes, “how long has this been going on?” Probably longer than people expect.
Weight lifting by itself may help improve performance, but its silly to think that that and pickle brine was all that Ryan did to help increase his performance to become the game’s most dominant SO pitcher ever.
Again, it would be very informative to talk with Jose Canseco regarding what he thinks of Nolan Ryan as he was his teammate for the final 1.5 yrs of Ryan’s career in TX (which became around that time a known place for PED useage, Rafael Palmiero also played there alongside Canseco, and Jose already named him in his first book).
Definitely curious now about Nolan Ryan; Jose Canseco is the one person who could help to settle the matter one way or the other if he would agree to talk about it.
Exactly, this jibes with Canseco’s telling in his book. But he also mentioned that right before he went to TX, there were players in MLB from other teams who quietly approached him regarding PEDS, what they could do for them, how to obtain them, etc.
Canseco, unlike these few nameless shadowy C or D-list players from the 70’s, was an MVP winner, the first 40-40 player in MLB. He was an A-list player, so whatever he was doing, other players would definitely be interested in emulating as well so they too could achieve results.
I also believe that PED usage in MLB is still ongoing, it’s just that its more subtle, and nowhere near as obvious. Suppose it comes out that the top players, including Ohtani have taken PEDS?
If anything it would be fairly easy for him to take PEDS in Japan, where the MLB media isn’t following him around and the Japanese media would probably protect him.
You can bet that on the day of Ichiro’s induction into the HOF this summer, it will be heavily watched live throughout all of Japan.
Ryan’s 3.58 ERA, coming at a time of higher pitcher dominance, with no DH in the NL, was one more additional reason why NY let him go. He wasn’t all that in NY.
Ryan lost nearly as many games as he won, only won 20 games twice in his 27 yr career. Carlton also has the MLB record for all time pickoffs, in second place is Andy Pettite, both of whom are southpaws. This makes sense since lefties face first base before starting their windup.
Also, his superstar status began in earnest after NY traded him away. So if anyone would’ve been a candidate for taking PEDS, it would’ve been Nolan Ryan. Also the fact that he knew Tom House, who took steroids in the early 70’s, speaks volumes.
Not stating that he did use steroids; AM stating that if there’s one candidate who could’ve taken them under the 70’s radar, it would be someone like Nolan Ryan, who had something to prove, going into his mid/late 20’s, career up to then wasn’t all that, had already been sent down to the minors. That kind of candidate when up vs the wall is more likely to try anything to keep his career going by any means necessary.
Ryan left Anaheim after 79. Downing lifted a lot in the off-season with Tigers C Lance Parrish. Both would have been PED candidates before Canseco and McGwire.
https://www.upi.com/Archives/1983/03/10/Tiger-Catcher-Thrives-On-Weightlift-Program/2618416120400/
According to Sparky, they were trained by a guy “who knows what he is doing.”
Downing by the way was with TX to end his career (91-92).
I never said widespread and agree that they weren’t. But you’re fooling yourself if you think PED’s and specifically steroids were totally absent from pro sports in the 70’s.
And when you say you PED’s, you are saying steroids. There are other PED’s like amphetamines, pain meds, and high doses of caffeine.
“When something asinine as ”caffeine is equivalent to PEDS”, then yes, it’s time to call bulshit on that. ”
That’s because you’re proudly ignorant and can only conceptualize caffeine as it exists in a cup of coffee. Have you ever looked into the effects of high doses of caffeine? They are very similar to amphetamines.
The rest of your comments are just words words words. Keep thinking baseball was a pure as a nun’s virtue before the 90’s if you like. I’ll keep laughing at you.
Both Parrish and Downing aren’t recognized as Alist players, either today or back in the day. But at least finally at long last, examples of players who could’ve taken PEDS back in the day. But let’s also again not easily dismiss Nolan Ryan, especially during the start of his career in Anaheim in 72.
Parrish and Downing weren’t seen as HOF material, much less very dominant players in their time. Hence why few in MLB at the time followed their lead. If Parrish suddenly started to hit 45 or 50 HRs in a season, well…
This would explain why someone like Jose Canseco, coming off his ROY and MVP awards was more listened to regarding PEDS (and also obviously Mark McGwire). When the greatest players, or at least, the best players of their era do something that’s perceived as increasing onfield performance, that sets the example for the entire sport to follow.
And I’ll keep stating that you’re full of it, IF you think that PEDS existed in MLB prior to 1970’s. They didn’t.
“That’s because you’re proudly ignorant and can only conceptualize caffeine as it exists in a cup of coffee.”
Again. You misread what I’ve written. PRIOR to 1950’s, caffeine existed primarily in coffee, tea, soda, and chocolate. There were no caffeine pills in the Dead Ball Age/or during 1920-50’s. IF you insist on lunacy, THEN by your own admission, the ONLY sources readily AVAILABLE during these years to Ruth, Gehrig, Cobb, Johnson, Williams, DiMaggio, Foxx, et al were Folgers, Maxwell House, Lipton, Pepsi, and chocolate bars.
Since Ty Cobb invested heavily in Coca Cola, including during his playing days, that would by extension mean that he was an original, early Cokehead, perpetually high on caffeine, which in large doses is the sole reason he had over 4,100k career hits, won numerous batting titles, hit over .400 BA three times in a season, etc.
To which we call: BULLSHIT.
“Have you ever looked into the effects of high doses of caffeine?”
Actually I have. Am a recovering addict. More than you would ever know.
And with that…crickets chirping from you.
“They are very similar to amphetamines.”
Neither caffeine NOR amphetamines ever directly caused MLBers to increase their onfield performances and stats to the extent that they accomplished amazing incredible feats.
Babe Ruth remains one of the gold standards. The only caffeine sources he would’ve had direct access to during his career was Folgers, Pepsi/Coke, Lipton, and of course chocolate bars. Facts don’t care about your feelings, those remain the facts. And the idea that tons of chocolate bars and Folgers with occasional binge drinking of Pepsi caused him to hit 714 career HR’s again, is asinine.
I also stated that one of the outgrowths of the PED era, since the 90s when they became widespread in MLB, has been to cynically assume that EVERY SINGLE ERA PRIOR, “must’ve been” the same way. When it point of fact, PEDS didn’t exist prior to 1940’s (in the US), and when they first became available to athletes, the, Olympics and NFLers were among the first to start taking them, but not in MLB until the 70’s.
One player who has been universally acknowledged to be an expert in PED usage in MLB remains Jose Canseco, because he was the first MLBer to directly cause PEDS to become widespread in the sport. In his book, Jose mentions that he never took amphetamines because he didn’t see the point. AND, once PEDS became widespread in MLB, that’s when amphetamine usage in baseball dropped as a whole. And why is that? Because compared to PEDS which were perceived to have a direct impact on MLB onfield performance, that people realized ampethamines for the scam that they always were. You can get basically the same result from tons of coffee/tea/soda intake; they don’t cause someone to hit 73 HR’s when they’re pushing 40, nor win Cy Youngs when they’re in their 40’s, etc.
HGH and testosterone boosters would have more of a direct effect on onfield performance than either caffeine or amphetamines.
You also refuse to consider the sop I give to possible players juicing during the 70’s, namely, the example of Nolan Ryan. He would be a classic textbook case of a borderline pitcher hitting his mid 20’s with little to show for his career at that point, desperate and willing to try anything that might help keep him in the majors, who MIGHT have turned to PEDS in order to increase his onfield performance.
Unlike you, I do think it would prove beneficial for someone to ask Jose Canseco for his opinion on whether or not he thinks that Nolan Ryan used PEDS. He pitched until he was 47, and by that point PED usage was widespread in MLB, and he was Canseco’s teammate for last couple seasons of his career (AND there were some known juicers in TX at the time, named in Jose’s first book).
“Keep thinking baseball was a pure as a nun’s virtue before the 90’s”
NEVER have said that, so this is lie.
I readily acknowledged that cheating existed in MLB since at least the beginning, or at least when MLB went professional, so the CIN team is considered to be the first pro team, and they got their start in 1869. The NL started in 1876, so either year is as good a start as any to state that onfield cheating existed.
I already stated onfield cheating existed, and that is worlds apart from taking PEDS. We can also infer a number of things to show I’m correct on this matter, namely that PEDS were nonexistent in MLB prior to the 1970’s (and weren’t widespread until ca. late 1980’s).
NFL clearly had PEDS decades before MLB. We can tell by observing the overall bulk of players from say, the 40’s, 50’s, into the 60’s, and the slight but significant differences in the 1970’s. But during the 80’s and 90’s, that’s when NFLers clearly didn’t resemble their historical 50’s/60’s counterparts. And why is that? Because of the better weight training methods, coupled with PEDS usage, and some players by the late 90’s early 2000s were starting to resemble WWE wrestlers. And why? Because they were taking some if not many of the same PEDS as they were.
MLB by contrast, the overall body composition of MLB players from say, the 1920’s all the way up through the mid 1980’s, a 60 yr or three generation time span, didn’t really change but remained fairly constant. Babe Ruth stood 6’2″ and weighed roughly 200-250lbs during his career (perhaps closer to 275lbs toward the end of his career). His 1925 regimen of diet and exercise amounted to basic weight reduction and simple barbells with rowing machine/treadmills. No excessive weight training (cause for the longest time, lifting weights was strictly taboo in MLB). Ruth lost the excessive weight and saved the second half of his career. But he damn sure didn’t use PEDS to do so, simply because of the fact that they were nonexistent during his era.
It’s long been a trope that MLB players were the least athletic, in shape, etc of all the big pro US sports. They’d start off good after spring training but by season’s end, they’d be worn out. Then they’d basically be sedentary for the offseason, or they’d have to work a 2nd job (since MLB didn’t pay most of them well to take the winter off during this 60 yr period).
Jose Canseco (and of course Mark McGwire) directly changed all of that. Jose was the first MLBer who actually did something unique, first 40-40 man in MLB, MVP winner, who PUBLICLY attributed his performance to steroids. He didn’t hide it and initially thought others should follow his lead, and of course, many many players did.
People like Canseco and of course late career Barry Bonds didn’t physically resemble their historical counterparts–they looked more like NFL linebackers or WWE wrestlers. Facts. This not only indicated heavy weight training, but as we came to find out, also indicated PED usage.
So aside from a few jabrones in the 70’s, and perhaps a few oddballs here and there (and possibly Nolan Ryan), prior to Canseco’s usage, MLBers for the most part tended to avoid the weight room as well as PEDS.
Jose Canseco showed them in a practical way just exactly what PEDS can do for their onfield performance, and they followed his example in droves.
Indeed. Baseball players in 1992 mostly looked and registered statistics much like baseball players in the 1970s and 1980s. By, say, 1996 they looked different and were wracking up different hitting statistics. My high school friend, the baseball player agent, told me around 1994 that Jose Canseco was the “Typhoid Mary of steroids,” and that appears to be exactly right according to Canseco’s 2005 memoir.
Right. Baseball players were clearly not as ambitious to use PEDs as other athletes. They were obviously rare in baseball until the mid 1990s, in comparison to the late 1950s in Olympic field throwing sports and in Olympic sprinting sports by 1968, when the US Olympic assistant track coach was a public advocate of steroid use.
That’s all I’ve ever been saying, and yet the woo woo’s simply don’t get it. Perhaps that amount of reading comprehension is above their pay grade.
Ty Cobb a Cokehead?
Babe Ruth a PED fiend because he overbinged on Pepsi?
Asinine, simply and purely asinine.
I’m beginning to think the Millennials and Zoomers simply didn’t pay much attention in reading comprehension back in elementary school, which is why for the blind dumb slow and stupid it has to be constantly and consistently slowly repeated until it penetrates their skulls.
Also consider this, Steve.
Most of the players directly named by Canseco in his first memoir (2005), were later proven to have used PEDS. He didn’t lie about that. In his second book, he directly named AROD. A few yrs later, AROD was involved in controversy regarding steroid usage and is unlikely to be inducted into the HOF anytime soon.
That’s why lately I do believe that Jose Canseco is the one ex-player to know IF Nolan Ryan did or did not use PEDS, and his opinion on whether or not he did use PEDS sometime during his career would be quite relevant to the whole topic.
If there was one player who had a direct reason to try PEDS in the early 70’s (practical, since he had just been traded to, which wasn’t seen as a great career move, had been sent down to the minors a few yrs earlier, etc) and maintain a career in MLB, it would’ve been Nolan Ryan. Pulitzer Prize winning investigative sportswriter Mark Fainaru-Wada, when writing Game of Shadows, quoted extensively from Canseco’s first book, as he considered him to be a legitimate source on PED usage in MLB for that period of time.
And where was Nolan Ryan traded to? Anaheim, in Southern California, home to Muscle Beach, weightlifting culture, and, unfortunately, where quite a bit of the whole Steroids/PED culture pretty much originated in the US. Because he wasn’t a superstar at the time of the 72 trade to the Angels, Ryan would’ve slipped under the radar and could’ve used PEDS on the qt.
I don’t say that Ryan used PEDS; I DO say that if one person would know the answer…it’s Jose Canseco.
Speaking about drug use, having you been attention to Alexandra Beynon and her link to Elon Musk?
https://projects.propublica.org/elon-musk-doge-tracker/
I don’t disagree with you. I’d guess that Nolan Ryan was using PEDs during his astonishing 1990s in his mid-40s.
Was he using PEDs in the 1970s when he broke Sandy Koufax’s strikeout record after he discovered weightlifting before the 1973 season?
I dunno.
“I’d guess that Nolan Ryan was using PEDs during his astonishing 1990s in his mid-40s.”
A wild guess.
Speaking of which, well, more like gaslighting, on your Substack you posted a doozy— It’s striking how little resistance there has been in the press to Trump’s war on DEI
Except a simple Google Search—media coverage of Trump’s war on DEI—shows, well, you’re wrong.
“So far, there seems to have been more media focus on comic examples of incompetence ensuing from DOGE’s move fast and break things approach”
Wow, so brave to mention it. Maybe you’re a bit worried that federal government statistics will no longer be available to help you craft your narratives?