There is something spicy about Olivier Nora – a Jew – at the head of a firm founded by a notoriously collaborationist publisher making this kind of declaration. The irony is not lost on some of us.

Alain Soral claims that this “cordon sanitaire” strategy comes from B’nai B’rith. It certainly is applied assiduously almost everywhere.

Why can’t Marine Le Pen get a ghost-written book published which no-one will read like everyone else’s? It’s is certainly a conundrum in a country where sleazy seducers of teenaged-girls have their juicy memoirs on sale.

It is more of a status question than a technical publishing question. Maybe a bit of an economic question too.
And I would not bet on the question, whether Marine Le Pen would at all be interested in writing a book.

For french readers, it comes from the book “FN, Tout ça pour ça” written by Anne Kling. The proof is an article from the same leftist newspaper ‘LeMonde’ on 03/26/1986. It is Mrs Kling who made the bulk of analytical work about the proliferation of the jewish lobby since the afterwar in France, with Emmanuel Ratier in another category. Soral sold her books at a time.

If you want an example of censorship during the French presidentials, you have the censorship of Christian Combaz with his “Portrait de Marianne avec un poignard dans le dos”, which was pretty harsh with the center-leftist-rightist french political celebrities. The book was supposed to be released before the elections and was cancelled just a few weeks before.

Guillaume, in addition to your article, I will add for your US curious readers a quote from the center-right newspaper ‘Figaro’ 05/19/2021 :

“Mein Kampf : Fayard [a French big publisher] wants to historicize the Evil with its new translation […] contextualized big reknown historians […] Over the 1000 pages, half at least is filled with explanations […] showing at each page its ludicrous, delirious and criminal nature. […] The goal of this publication is to offer a rigorous alternative to these free-roaming versions of Mein Kampf”.

One can obviously perceive the French ass-wiping ideology, coming from undoubtedly great historians in this example. It makes a good counterpart for censorship.

The message is clear (“come l’eau de roche”), France is 100% a Plutocracy in practice.

The second message is that women were allowed to vote for the first time in 1944 and since then men still view them as second class citizens and no woman has ever been French Prime Minister or President – Those are French democratic values.

Some German politicians even resigned from their CDU positions when Merkel was elected Chancellor – the first in Germany.

This tells you how hypocrite those countries that preach openness, equality and their “democratic values” around the world are when their own houses are on fire!

I’ve seen a few media blurbs that suggest Le Pen is picking up popularity with the young voters. That would be interesting if it is true.

What is she doing on social media? Her website has plenty of videos of her appearances on national media, like this morning’s (1 June 2021) appearance on CNEWS’ La Matinale ( https://www.cnews.fr/emission/2021-06-01/la-matinale-du-01062021-1087814 ), or other clips like assembly speeches, etc., but nothing that talks directly to the voting public.

The German Left Party member Sahra Wagenknecht does a weekly vlog, surprisingly with a very pro-German people bent that includes her opposition to immigration, opposition to harmful environmental edicts that screw the little guy, opposition to globalism, opposition to the current German approach to COVID, and so on … views that put her strongly in opposition not only to many in her party, but also in opposition to pretty much all other parties aside from the AfD. Doing so, she’s picked up 250k subscribers on YouTube alone, with nearly 16m views of her videos since 2019, and that’s just YouTube; Wagenknecht is on several of the other big social media outlets.

Although she’d always be at risk of being blocked, LePen might nevertheless get her message out to far more people by pulling a Trump and using social media to connect to more people with her message

“The article also makes clear that the big publishers range politically from centrist to far-left in political orientation…”

Excuse me, this is utter rubbish. The big publishers and the other elites are extreme far-right capitalists. There is nothing ‘moral’ or ‘progressive’ or in any way decent or human about them.

Mass immigration into Europe has one objective: to force population growth, to drive wages and living standard down for the many, and rents and profits up for the few. End of story. It is a vicious and utterly amoral policy put in place by a vicious and utterly amoral elite for their own selfish motives the public be damned. It is always a mistake to use the terminology of the enemy.

There is little so disgusting as a rich person pushing policies that will enrich themselves at the expense of impoverishing everyone else, and then claiming the moral high ground. Unless these people themselves consent to making the same sacrifices that they DEMAND be UNDEMOCRACTICALLY inflicted upon their less-wealthy fellow citizens, they have no standing to preach about morality and any such claims should be rejected with outrage (I include also their employees and people whose jobs and careers depend on toeing the party line).

It’s not remotely surprising that the oligarchs want total dominance of not just the politics, but the entire intellectual world.

They also wisely know that politics is downstream from culture… and any cultural achievement, even just selling a few hundred thousand biographies, could open the door more widely for them losing their iron grip.

If the French want to know what the future holds for them, they should read Jean Raspail’s CAMP OF THE SAINTS, which of course the Zionist French plutocracy does not want the public to read. So far the majority of French white zombies have less will to survive than George Romero’s walking dead zombies had to fight for survival.

The right in France should get together and form their own publishing houses. If they fear getting fire bombed, they could do all their business online and have the actual printing done in a country that’s out of the reach of terrorists. The delivery of the books to the reader could be mailed in plain white packaging. I’m sure Le Pen’s books would sell very well.

There was a female French prime minister, Edith Cresson. She later ended up in Santer´s EU commission which had to step down summarily for charges of corruption. Cresson was also affected. I did not know that some German politicians resigned their CDU positions when Merkel was elected Chancellor. I guess they rather fell foul of a purge of the party by Merkel´s regime. Having had to live under her regime and its utter contempt for the constitution and the laws of the country, let alone its well-being, I could only applaud politicians resigning their positions in protest against this awful woman.

Thank you, you seem to be extremely well informed!

With all due respect, it’s you who is wrong. The policies you describe are supported today by the fake left and the fake right in the political “centre” and by the greens. If you want to define all plutocratic parties as ipso facto right wing, that is your choice, but understand this has not been the case for decades now.

The fact that the anti-French Leftist and liberal establishment refuses to publish Le Pen is not surprising. They are merely exercising their will to power. The game was lost when these constellation of forces captured the commanding heights of the French information economy.

Sadly MlP is not very good and looks like a drunken Normandy fisherwoman.
She’ll lose badly again.
It would be better for everyone if she stood down – even her hot little niece would be better than her.

Three additional points: (1) French public libraries, like American, tend to exclude a lot of books on the right. Finding books by Eric Zemmour or Jean-Marie Le Pen at them is not easy. Similarly, in the United States, my public library has an ebook service called Cloud Library. It has Ibram X. Kendi, Robin DiAngelo and other anti-white writers, but no Candace Owens, Jason Reilly or Thomas Sowell. (2) Is it true that Solzhenitsyn wrote a book about Jews and Russians that has never been published in an English translation? (3) Every now and again on French radio I hear discussions about freedom of expression. Almost never mentioned are the rightists who have actually been harassed by the laws. It’s rather remarkable.

@Joe Paluka:
‘The delivery of the books to the reader could be mailed in plain white packaging.’

I assume that you’re either 1> under thirty, or 2> not very fluent in English.
You just wrote that the delivery could be mailed.

Time to repeat grade 7.

Yes, I know these things don’t really matter to good Americans.

Careful, or the good looking younger woman you might wind up with is Macron’s protégée, Maud Bregeon.

Une question pour vous, Monsieur Durocher: You quoted the boss of Robert Laffont but you also seemed to include her renouned publishing house in the arrogant gaggle of big publishers who are shamelessly participating in political censorship. Has Robert Laffont really joined the industry’s consensus to blockade the words of Marine Le Pen and her supporters — as you say “a solid one-third” of the French electorate?

That would be disgraceful in view of the fact that the towering sociopolitical issue of unrestricted immigration (i.e. replacement) remains precisely what Le Pen seems to have in common with Jean Raspail, who attacked that policy in his novel of the century. And it was Robert Laffont who first published Le Camp des Saints in Paris in 1973, has published several new editions of the same and has consistently defended Raspail against his many political detractors.

In the latest edition from Robert Laffont, 2011, author Raspail thanked Robert Laffond and took the trouble to cite chapter and verse the dozens of sentences in his (now grandfathered) novel that he would be unable to write today because of a slew of French censorship laws enacted after the book first appeared (and some possibly because it appeared).

How can a French democracy survive under control of a French elite that despises so many French patriots?

How can a French democracy survive under control of a French elite that despises so many French patriots?

Wrong question, Mr. St. Germain.

The “resistance” never fought for the ‘survival of French democracy’ but for the (((French elite that despises French patriots))).

Unless your compatriots understand this (and 1789) France is doomed.

to force population growth, to drive wages and living standard down for the many, and rents and profits up for the few

If that were the case they are doing a pretty bad job. The French actually discriminate against hiring non-French/European (good for them). Surely, most, or a large percent, of Muslims and blacks are on some kind of welfare; or else own the little shops (alimentation). The only other non-French/Europeans I dealt with were in internet connection, c. 2006.

The article uses the term “far right” to mean something it does not mean. Hitler is usually called “far right” when he was not anything like the right. He was a hard leftist and good buddies with Stalin until it became apparent that Stalin was preparing for war against Germany.

MlP, is a leftist with sensible attitudes about immigration. A rare combination.

Agree. With the exception that there are many in the political, media and activist caste who are too dumb and/or brainwashed to know what they are doing; also, hardly anyone is self-critical enough to realize one’s own hyprocrisy and one’s own preaching the bitter water of “moral” policies while drinking the sherry reserved for the preachers.

There is no democracy in Jewish-run Western countries. It’s a shame there’s been vote rigging in the US election, especially through the voting machines, but it’s not like there would have been fair elections if not for the rigged voting machines. The real fraud is that most politicians and news media are under Jewish control and support race replacement. Opponents to the race replacement program are slandered, insulted, vilified and kept out of the media. It’s not a democratic system at all.

Under that system, Trump was not allowed to defend White people. He couldn’t even say the word “White”. As for Marine Le Pen, she’s been told she had to undemonize. The National Front used to be opposed to race replacement, and that is demonic. Marine Le Pen now needs to keep reassuring the authorities that her political party is no longer demonic.

As part of the undemonization, Marine Le Pen has fired most serious nationalists from her party. The survivors understand they must keep silent. The party no longer has grassroots activists. The leadership is now partly made of homosexuals. The party has been renamed “Rassemblement National” instead of “Front National”. The word “rassemblement” means gathering, regrouping, rally. As part of the regrouping, they have been hiring a few African and Arab candidates, and it makes you wonder if the new name of the party should not be “Remplacement National”.

Examples:
https://twitter.com/E_Louvel/status/1390385655012904961/photo/1

There is also Didier Améla, who is Togolese. He is a candidate for the Rassemblement National in France, while in Togo, he is the President of a Togolese political party called the National Front.

And there was the case of the Algerian candidate Kamel Agag-Boudjahla. The party leadership chose him over the long-time activist Marie-Laure Duchanoy, who told them she had some doubts about his sincerity. Then, last month, Kamel suddenly denounced the RN, which he said was based on hatred and conspiracy theories. He announced he would write a book titled “I infiltrated the RN”. There was some talk of expelling Duchanoy from the party for her opposition to the Algerian candidate.

Meanwhile, Richard Sulzer is the leader of a movement within the RN representing activists of the Jewish faith. He warns against the presence in the next elections of RN candidates that have a “sulphurous” past, that is to say a demonic past. “Sulphurous” is a word used by the Jewish media against White nationalists. Sulzer is a former advisor to Marine Le Pen and has given her a list of neonazis that must be taken off the list of candidates.

Marine Le Pen’s tactic of undemonization is not just a tactic to avoid trouble. She doesn’t seem to care that White people are being replaced. But I will still vote for the RN, since it is the only supposedly anti-immigration party allowed in the media.

A French book which should be required reading is The Camp of the Saints.

Then again, the entire West is already living the novel’s nightmare.

As part of the undemonization, Marine Le Pen has fired most serious nationalists from her party.

Something similar is happening with the AfD in Germany, principally via George Meuthen, who is leading a campaign to politically castrate or expel members of the s.g. Flügel (right wing) of the party, which is usually described as ‘völkisch-nationalistisch und rechtsextreme’ (the latter a form of ‘demonization’ of course) — Meuthen and his allies in the AfD are ostensibly trying to make the AfD more ‘bürgerlich’ (respectable) in order to both escape unwanted attention from the Verfassungsschutz (this attention is largely due to pressure from the media and the Systempartein, i.e. established political parties) and attract more voters — there is no evidence this is working however (the AfD lost some support in the recent election in Sachsen-Anhalt) — to many supporters, the AfD is, above all, and must remain, ‘völkisch-nationalistisch’ — the last thing these people want is for the AfD to become a slightly right of center version of the CDU.

Absolutely Le Monde won’t touch the issue of French Nationalist Marine Le Pen. For years now I’ve noticed the absolute uselessness of trusting the major European newspapers and journals, ALL of them being no different from the New York Times, Washington Post, etc. All of them are exclusively committed to the one world order scheme. Doesn’t matter if it’s Die Welt in Germany, La Repubblica in Italy, La Monde in France, or the utterly absurd Guardian in England. All of them follow the same guidelines on what they will or will not report.

“All of them follow the same guidelines on what they will or will not report.”

The role of the major newspapers is to pass on the guidelines to the rest of the press. Anyway, I’ve heard that Le Monde and Libération get to decide what will be the official viewpoint of the French news media.

If it’s true, it means that the other newspapers don’t need to refer to some Jewish organization to know what should be printed: they just wait for Le Monde’s commentary about everything, and follow suit.

The AFP news agency plays a similar role. Much of the content of the diverse French newspapers is the same text directly copied from AFP dispatches: whole paragraphs without any modification. So, Le Monde serves as a source of opinions to be imitated, and the AFP as a source of alleged facts.

I wouldn’t be surprised if the NYT, the Washington Post, Die Welt, La Repubblica played the same role as Le Monde.

Meuthen muss weg!https://t.co/PRzCeo1aYI

— Klemens Kilic (@Klemens_Kilic) June 14, 2021

If you want to define all plutocratic parties as ipso facto right wing, that is your choice, but understand this has not been the case for decades now.

Isn’t it something how liberty and equality for all French citizens and fraternity among French compatriots became liberty of plutocrats to race replace the French people with their “equals” among the Third World masses because we’re all brothers and sisters in one big happy globalist human family?

I don’t think it was a conspiracy, but it couldn’t have worked out better for the plutocracy if it had been.

Native Europeans should have rigorously resisted this Satanic Globalist immigration of foreign infiltrator populations decades ago. Europeans became too tolerant. Too much tolerance of this kind leads to extinction.

re Solzhenitsyn and his nominally “anti-Jew” 200 Years Together:

1) it has no professional English-language translation/publication. THAT the Jews have prevented,

But

2) much of it is available in several English language versions on the ‘net.

The “non-existent” lobby knows that only the FN can take power from them. Even if it had been taken care to add Golnagel to him as adviser and Zemmour as unofficial spokesperson, the traditional voters of the FN are not fooled. Frexit, the exit from Europe that was part of the FN’s initial program, has been abandoned. If it allow her an opposition to Muslim immigration because the press can’t find nothing else to propose since all the decisions are taken either in the EU or in NATO or in Washington, his electorate will never accept family politic being challenged by the élite ». The last regional vote where the FN lost positions is a warning

An ironical quirk of that publisher boycott occurred when no one wanted to publish Daddy Le Pen’s memoirs; and the obscure publishing house that agreed to it sold out the initial 50k-copy issue within a week of the book coming out of the press.

What’s ironical too is that, while the new PC line has not managed to weaken the “republican front” against the Rassemblement National (ex-Front National), let alone the “episcopal front” set up by catholic bishops, the poor score in the last elections show that the dissident following of Jean-Marie Le Pen is at best tepidly supporting the rebranded party.

When recently dissident Hervé Ryssen was jailed mainly for reposting a tweet considered negationist, only one leader of the RN denounced the infringement on free speech, Bruno Golnisch; and this, characteristically, attracted immediate disapproving reactions from other leaders, who made it clear that he was speaking in his own name and indeed against the line of the party.

Not sure what you mean by “great historians”. They manifestly plan to play a wikipedia trick, holding your hand to make sure you don’t read the text at face value but through an interpretation grid that will have been prepared for you. When Hitler voices outrage at bolshevik exactions, don’t you take it at face value! Remember he is against human rights! When he mentions cancer to criticize German generals’ failure to take a necessary but painful cure before it is to late, don’t you imagine he is talking about geopolitical evils; cancer meant “Jews”, of course.

As a matter of fact I haven’t had occasion to look at that piece of assisted reading. The examples I’m quoting come from respectively my looking for all passages about Russia to determine whether Suvorov’s “discovery” held water (and I found it contradicts both of Mein Kampf and David Irving’s Hitler’s War) and my checking on a reference (in a theological book) to cancer as a metaphor for Jews, as I still had to find a Mein Kampf quote that could serve as a harbinger of an extermination plan to come.

Interestingly, when I was a high school students, I liked riding a commuter’s train to Paris and stroll by the used book stands on the Seine left bank. And something that struck me is that a bestseller at the time was, precisely, Mein Kampf. That was before the Internet. People wanted to make their opinion, based on primary material, when WW2 historiography is overwhelmingly made of mutual citations of material far removed from primary sources.

When I saw the headline I thought to myself “she’s not that bad”, then I realised it was about a book.

Marine Le Pen is making some suspicious moves as of late. Many have the impression she has sold out.

“Olivier Nora [the CEO of the publisher Grasset]”

Ashkenazi Jew. Check. And Muriel Beyer doesn’t sound too French to me.

Jews in France constitute 0.7% of the population, yet they have enormous influence all over.

Why is this pattern observed in many countries?

Are the Jews really chosen to rule over the goyim?

The first things that Hitler did on taking power.

Arrest all the prominent communists and put them in camps. Strip Jews of civil rights and professorships. Encourage ethnic German women to have children and then rearm the men with modern rifles machine guns that democratic Weimar banned. Put all the homos in camps.

Label that as you wish. You can argue the Hitler was an ethnic collectivist but there’s nothing there I’d call left wing. Do you mean that Hitler wasn’t a libertarian?

It’s true, just read Mein Kampf. Hitler was massively opposed to commies and leftists of all sorts, so whatever he was, it was not left-wing. More of an extreme racialist nationalist plus whatever odds and sods of ideologies that fitted in with that. Probably some of his programs appear socialistic but were nationalist in ultimate intent.

… principally via George Meuthen, who is leading a campaign to politically castrate or expel members of the s.g. Flügel (right wing) of the party, …

… principally via George Meuthen, who is was leading a campaign to politically castrate or expel members of the s.g. Flügel (right wing) of the party, …

that seems to have been ended.