The below text is from your FB page. These are clear Holocaust deniers. Saying that the Gas chambers are fake. With an attached website entitled the HOLOCAUST LIES EXPOSED, on an underground website.

Why do you let people who deny the entirety of the Holocaust, not just the numbers of victims etc. (trim around the edges)?

Are you enabling and promoting Holocaust denial by engaging and encouraging these people without proper and honest responses? I have heard you rebuttal this with your idea that history is can be revisited and revised. Fair enough but there were gas chambers Gilad you know that people were gassed and cremated. One of your heroes Israel Shahak was a survivor who completely denounced Judaism but not the holocaust. Why not tell your followers about him and his back round? Again aren’t you promoting holocaust denial?

Lord Falcaoner lol. I feel for you we don’t have doucebags called Lord Falconer in the US, what a joke. The guy knows zero.

Alison Chabloz
Alison Chabloz Interesting extract from a Jeff Rense interview with David Cole: Cole was the archivist on a WW2 film back in 2000, collaborating with the head of a Boston-based Jewish NGO named Elsworth Rosen.

In a telephone conversation, Rosen – who had no idea who he was in fact talking to as Cole was then using the name ‘Stein’ – admitted:

“It’s such a shame that we have to keep pretending these phoney gas chambers are real. But, you know… We can’t let the deniers succeed.”

The Ultimate False G

od?

Mic P J Fletch Alison …great to see you…another revisionist heroine

Video Link

Fair enough but there were gas chambers Gilad

Only one. And, we have a picture …. this is the door into the gas chamber, from the inside…

How anyone could be stupid enough build a hoax gas chamber with an unsealed wooden office door with a large window will perhaps never be known, but we do know who did the building … from the book ‘Auschwitz 1270 to the Present’ by Holocaust scholars Robert Jan van Pelt and Deborah Dwork:

When Auschwitz was transformed into a museum after the war, the decision was taken to concentrate the history of the whole complex into one of its component parts. The infamous crematoria where the mass murders had taken place lay in ruins in Birkenau, two miles away. The committee felt that a crematorium was required at the end of the memorial journey, and crematorium I was reconstructed to speak for the history of the incinerators at Birkenau. This program of usurpation was rather detailed. A chimney, the ultimate symbol of Birkenau, was re-created; four hatched openings in the roof, as if for pouring Zyklon B into the gas chamber below, were installed, and two of the three furnaces were rebuilt using original parts. There are no signs to explain these restitutions, they were not marked at the time, and the guides remain silent about it when they take visitors through this building that is presumed by the tourist to be the place where it happened.

For the record, the number of Jews killed in the camps for being Jews is zero, and the Nazis aggressively investigated crime in the camps ….. under direction of the ‘bloodhound judge’ Conrad Morgen – https://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/08-07-46.asp

HERR PELCKMANN: Now, briefly summarized, what was the outcome of the fight of the SS jurisdiction against crime in con-centration camps?

REINECKE: Altogether, approximately 800 cases were investi-gated; 400 of these 800 cases were brought to trial, and 200 out of those 400 ended with sentences by the court. Among the cases investigated were proceedings against five commanders of concentra-tion camps; proceedings against two commanders were completed and ended with a sentence of death by shooting.,

MORGEN: I investigated Weimar-Buchenwald, Lublin, Auschwitz, Sachsenhausen, Oranienburg, Hertogenbosch, Krakow; Plaszow, Warsaw, and the Concentration Camp Dachau. And others were investigated after my time.

HERR PELCKMANN: How many cases did you investigate? How many sentences were passed? How many death sentences?

MORGEN: I investigated about 800 cases, that is, about 800 documents, and one document would affect several cases. About 200 were tried during my activity. Five concentration camp commanders were arrested by me personally. Two were shot after being tried.

HERR PELCKMANN: You had them shot?

MORGEN: Yes. Apart from the commanders, there were numerous other death sentences against Fuehrer and Unterfuehrer.

When some people die in a war that they started, how is that a “holocaust”? It seems more like “predictable outcome”—or even “just desserts.” http://judaism.is/holocaust.html

David Cole exposed numerous frauds, including fake “gas chambers” at Auschwitz, Dachau, and Majdanek, frauds perpetrated by the Simon Wiesenthal Center, US Holocaust Museum, and other prominent promoters of the hoax:

• “For decades, the staff of the Auschwitz State Museum misrepresented an air raid shelter as an ‘original state’ gas chamber. I exposed that fraud in 1992 after interviewing senior curator Dr. Francizsek Piper on camera.
• “After the opening of the Simon Wiesenthal Center’s Museum of Tolerance in 1993, the curators took a 1961 Polish fictional film titled The Ambulance and reedited it to appear as ‘found footage’ of a Nazi gassing of children. I torpedoed that sham in 1995.
• “For years, the officials at the Majdanek State Museum displayed a supposed gas chamber—equipped with a window and doors that lock from the inside and open into the room. In 1994, the museum’s research director, Tomasz Kranz, admitted to me that it was actually a simple delousing room after I showed footage of the phony ‘chamber’ on national TV.
• “The U.S. National Archives and the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum ‘celebrated’ the museum’s grand opening in 1993 by collaborating on a book in which old Army Signal Corps footage of a Paris rifle range was ‘repurposed’ as footage of a gas chamber. I uncovered that deceit the same year.
• “In 1996, Raye Farr (then-film archives director of the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum) wrote a letter to me in which she revealed that the ‘Mogilev footage’ (the supposed footage of the first Nazi gassing) was widely considered to be a Soviet fake. Ten years later, she was still gushing publicly about the footage being authentic.
• “In a 1994 interview with noted ‘skeptic’ and acclaimed prop comic Dr. Michael Shermer, Michael Berenbaum (then-director of the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum and its research institute) conceded, after being quizzed about my work, that he’d never actually examined the supposed gas chamber door displayed in his own museum as proof of the Nazis’ infamous murder weapon.
• “Not to be outdone, Jerzy Wróblewski, director of the Auschwitz State Museum, told the New Yorker in 1993 that he has ‘neither the time nor the resources to deal with all the issues’ I raised regarding authenticity.
• “For good measure, I should add all the times that respected Holocaust professionals admitted to me (when they knew me as Stein) that the ‘gas chamber’ at Dachau was a fake, built for show by the U.S. Army after liberation.”

David Cole, Justifying My Existence, Taki’s Magazine, February 17, 2015 http://takimag.com/article/justifying_my_existence_david_cole/print#ixzz3Rz9tsvaW

There are at least 7 major Jewish Holocaust revisionists / doubters / denialists … Some of them assaulted and threatened with murder by other Jews

(1) Jewish Ron Unz (born 1961) our host here on Unz Review, quite surprising people with his article saying:

“I think it far more likely than not that the standard Holocaust narrative is at least substantially false, and quite possibly, almost entirely so”, Unz adding more generally regarding wars, deaths under communism etc, that, in his view, “The inescapable conclusion is that in per capita terms Jews were the greatest mass-murderers of the twentieth century”
https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-holocaust-denial/

(2) Jewish Joseph Ginzburg (1908-90) aka Joseph G. Burg, entered Poland and Germany with the Russian army, interviewing Auschwitz & other camp surivors, and said the Holocaust story, was a Zionist deception scheme; West Germany conducted book-burnings of this Jew’s books
https://www.henrymakow.com/2017/09/Josef-Burg.html

(3) Jewish Guy Dommergue (1924-2013), full name Roger Guy Dommergue Polacco de Menasce, was a French holocaust sceptic, who thought the Jewish practice of, and obsession with, genital mutilation of baby boys, was a key aspect of Jewish psychopathy
https://www.henrymakow.com/2014/09/Circumcision-Explains-Jewish-Psyche.html

(4) Jewish Bobby Fischer (1943-2008), anti-Zionist chess master, said, “They made up the Holocaust. I exposed the Holocaust as never having happened. The Jews are liars.”
http://www.renegadetribune.com/bobby-fischer-speaks-jews/

(5) Jewish Jacob Cohen (born 1944), his earliest childhood in Morocco, denies the Holocaust and argues it only became a big affair some many years after WW2 was over

Video Link

(6) Jewish Nathanael Kapner (born 1950), a convert to Orthodox Christianity making anti-Zionist ‘Real Jew News’ postings & videos, says, “The Holocaust tale is a huge HOAX”
http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=943

(7) Jewish David Christopher Cole (born 1968), aka ‘David Stein’, made a 1992 video saying the Auschwitz story was significantly fake. He was physically attacked, and money was offered for anyone who would kill him … leading him to live for a while under an alternate name until he was ‘doxxed’ for the holocaust revisionism. Now, Cole seems to have shifted views, even writing emotionally-agitated polemics against Ron Unz … Here is the 1992 video:

Henry Makow, dissident Canadian Jewish writer of Polish-Jewish heritage, writes often critiquing Jewish, Zionist, and Israeli power – including some material on the people above – although Makow says the Holocaust narrative is correct in essentials

Regarding the above, Makow suggests that, many in the globalist-internationalist wing of Jewry, are anti-Zionist, and Makow feels a few Jews have come to deny the Holocaust as a way of seeking to undermine the state of Israel which they detest

It seems that as late as 1939, most European Jews were non-Zionist, indeed anti-Zionist … they seem to have disappeared. What happened to them?

You are not listening to Gilad’s video, he does not admit that he is a Holocaust denier. Gilad rejects being called an anti Semite. Something all you deniers do not give a flying fuck about. I am not here to argue for or against the Holocaust believe what you will.
Most Holocaust deniers are shunned from the world, David Irving can’t buy a lecture room anywhere in the world.
Gilad wants to speak, lecture and write. Holocaust denial will alter his respectability. It is a fine line. Ron and Gilad and even Philip Giraldi want to dance with you all but not really where the rubber meats the road, they may say that there are revisions in total numbers but that is it.
No one in their right might denies the Holocaust that is a fact of life, the ones that insist are very marginalized.
Knock yourselves out but spare me the memes and bullshit. Follow the story it is about Gilad and whether he denies it or not. Listen Saggy I am not reading your shite.

Listen to 3;30 on the video, he denies that he promotes Holocaust denial. Stick to the fucking script. I am not dancing with you. These posts pertain only to WHETHER GILAD DENIES OR PROMOTES HOLOCAUST DENIAL.
In the above video he says there is not proof of that. I pulled some comments from his FB page that show otherwise. If I agree with you that their was no Holocaust will you stop posting your bullshit.
Okay there was no Holocaust you are right. Happy.

That seems to be the more reasonable position. But even the people who express this position, e.g., Bishop Richard Williamson (degrees from Cambridge Univ. in modern history), Rabbi Yosef Mizrachi, et al., face the same excoriation as the total deniers. Both Williamson and Mizrachi say hundreds of thousands of Jews died in Nazi concentration camps. But that is not good enough for the European courts and the arbiters of correct thought. Williamson has been excommunicated and arrested and charged with hate crimes and been on trial in Germany and the UK. Rabbi Mizrachi has been banned from travel to the UK and he has been vilified for denying the official 6 million number. Williamson denied the 6 million number and gas chambers.

https://www.dw.com/en/holocaust-denying-bishop-loses-case-against-german-conviction/a-47306452
Holocaust-denying bishop loses case against German conviction
Richard Williamson, who denied that gas chambers were used in Nazi Germany’s death camps, argued his right to free speech was violated. But the European Court of Human Rights has described his sentence as “very lenient.”

https://www.timesofisrael.com/ny-rabbi-not-even-1-million-jews-killed-in-holocaust/

NY rabbi: ‘Not even 1 million’ Jews killed in Holocaust

Falconer is really like a trained falcon.

I guess it beats being a dog.

These posts pertain only to…

…whatever the owner of the site decides! This is neither your schul, your satrap, nor your living room. You are not now and never will be in command of Gentiles—no matter what your megalomaniacal Chabad rabbis teach. http://judaism.is/chabad-and-aipac.html

I am not here to argue for or against the Holocaust…

We know that. You never deal with facts and evidence. All you spew is subjective emotionalism and Jewish fables (Titus 1:14).

Most Holocaust deniers are shunned from the world

Hardly true even in the (((occupied))) nations, hence the (((panic))) about “increasing antisemitism.” Today I replaced about two dozen videos “disappeared” by JewTube, most of them exposing the HoloHoax, that are now readily found on other platforms. And that is why you Jews are in such a control freak panic. The Synagogue of Satan has lost control of the narrative. In the process, the world is learning what the children of the Father of Lies and Murder do—you lie and kill.

Jews have an ancient tradition of lying about victimhood.

For example, note the typically ridiculous self-reports of victimhood in tractate Gittin 57b of the Torah, the 4 BILLION (yes, BILLION) Jews killed by the Romans [Gittin 57b claims Vespasian killed “four hundred thousand myriads” = 400,000 x 10,000 = 4 BILLION] and the 64 million Jewish children skewered and burned in scrolls by the Romans in one city alone [Gittin 58a claims “400 synagogues” each with “400 teachers” and “400 pupils” for each teacher” = 400 x 400 x 400 = 64 million].

Habitual, arguably congenital, liars!

rubber meats the road

Yeah, “meat,” “plaque,” and “then,” run-on sentences, kindergarten punctuation, word salad… yet another “high IQ genius.”

These are clear Holocaust deniers.

So fucking what?

This is not a revisionist site, and I don’t want to get into a discussion about the ‘Holocaust’ — but you stupidly fail to see the larger issue: that Jews (and their allies) want to uniquely stigmatize, if not criminalize (already the case in many countries), anything that, or anyone who, challenges the conventional (some say ‘exterminationist’) take on the ‘Holocaust’ — they must be pushed out of polite society, even lose their careers — people are simply fed up with this — it is anti-intellectual and offends the sense of decency and fairness in a large and growing number of people.

In contrast, you can say Roosevelt knew in advance about the attack on Pearl Harbor, but allowed it to happen in order to guarantee US entry into the war, and no one cares.

So just put up all the evidence for (the ‘exterminationist’ view of) the ‘Holocaust’, and let revisionists look at it and respond — ‘extermationists’ can do the same to revisionist material — we’ll make up our own minds about what to believe — what the evidence supports (and since as alleged the ‘Holocaust’ was a crime, and a conspiracy, sufficient evidence is needed, preferably to the ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’ standard used in modern adversarial court proceedings).

Why do you let people who deny the entirety of the Holocaust, not just the numbers of victims etc. (trim around the edges)?

Is this supposed to be English?

Lemme guess:

“Why do you not obey the Jewish Authoritarian Imperative and shut these goyim down? THEY DON’T GET TO HAVE FREE SPEECH OR OPINIONS!!!”

Etc.

Fuck these people.

I mean imagine thinking you get to dictate history. That your version of history is inviolable and sacrosanct and beyond criticism and beyond critique and beyond dialog and AAAAARRRRRGH.

Fuck…these…people. They should be sent to their own country, leaving us to ours.

Most Holocaust deniers are shunned from the world, David Irving can’t buy a lecture room anywhere in the world.

Argument from authority; fallacies for the stupid goyim.

Not really the venue for that audience. Try Huffpo.

(Maybe I’ve been wrong all these years, and Jews don’t use these shitty arguments over and over again because they’re racist, arrogant, parochial, backward and insulated, and thus think we’re all stupid; maybe Jews keep using these shitty arguments because they’re stupid.

Meh – probably some combination of the two)

For the record, the number of Jews killed in the camps for being Jews is zero

Who came up with with that slippery formulation? Why do see it repeated practically verbatim so frequently? How in God’s name could that ever be established to be true?

Zero is a very small number, it only takes one single case to make the statement false.

As it stands anyone who takes part in these debates who is inclined to believe that the Jewish death toll was anywhere between zero and six million is liable to be flamed by both sides. Whose interest does that serve? Who would deliberately argue the most extreme case possible, or encourage others to do so? Only a credulous fool or a deliberate saboteur that is who.

Who came up with with that slippery formulation?

I took it from this video …. .


Video Link… when it was on YouTube, now deleted … but still available on BitChute ….

It is the opposite of slippery. It’s a simple fact.

Why do see it repeated practically verbatim so frequently?

I like it, and I tend to repeat myself.

How in God’s name could that ever be established to be true?

The whole idea of Nazis killing Jews in the camps because they were Jews is not only false, it is preposterous and contrary to everything that we know about the Nazis. It is just as if I’d said the number of Japanese killed in the US camps for being Japanese is zero. It didn’t happen.

Also I always follow that remark with information about Conrad Morgen who investigated crimes by the SS in the camps. More from Morgen ….. https://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/08-07-46.asp

MORGEN: Yes, because I had authority to visit concentration camps. Only a very few persons had this permission. Before beginning an investigation, I examined the concentration camp in question in all its details very closely, inspecting especially those arrangements which seemed particularly important to me. I visited them repeatedly and without notice. I was working mostly in Buchenwald itself for 8 months and have lived there. I was in Dachau for one or two months.

HERR PELCKMANN: Since so many visitors to concentration camps say they were deceived, do you consider it possible that you, too, were a victim of such deceit?

MORGEN: I have just pointed out that I was not a mere visitor to a concentration camp but I had settled down there for a long residence, I might almost say I established myself there. It is almost impossible to be deceived for such a long time. In addition, the commissions from the Reich Criminal Police Department worked under my instructions, and I placed them directly in the concentration camps themselves. I do not mean to say that in spite of these very intensive efforts I was able to learn of all the crimes, but I believe that there was no deception in regard to what I did learn.

HERR PELCKMANN: Did you gain the impression, and at what time, that the concentration camps were places for the extermination of human beings?

MORGEN: I did not gain this impression. A concentration camp is not a place for the extermination of human beings. I must say that my first visit to a concentration camp-I mentioned the first one was Weimar-Buchenwald-was a great surprise to me. The

489

7 Aug. 46

camp is situated on wooded heights, with a wonderful view. The installations were clean and freshly painted. There was much lawn and flowers. The prisoners were healthy, normally fed, sun-tanned, working …

PRESIDENT: When are you speaking of? When are you speaking of?

MORGEN: I am speaking of the beginning of my investigations in July 1943.

If you recall Buchenwald is where Ilse Koch supposed drank the blood of Jewish prisoners, etc., and Morgen was tortured at Nuremberg to testify to Ilse’s crimes, but he refused. The holohoax is not only false, it is 100% fantasy.

I do not promote holocaust denial as much as I do not promote holocaust conservativism.

Lying Jews created the holohoax, It is the responsibility of every honest Jew (I don’t think you can find 5, living) to expose the lies. The holohoax was pivotal in creation of Israel and it has led to the unending wars in the ME which have killed millions and which threaten to expand to Armageddon any day now.

I am not historian and do not offer a view of the past.

This is bullshit. You have two choices, expose the holohoax or be considered another lying Jew.

You allow pernicious horseshit to be told, do you not see the slippery slope. So quick to point out the lies and falsehoods of Jews and Zionist, let you let lie after lie go on your chat sites.
Then cry fowl when people accuse you of supporting holocaust denial. Isn’t ignoring blatant lies half of denial. Why not say to those people that you factually no better. One of your heroes was a survivor. Israel Shahak. This is just common sense Gilad that is all.

What i do instead is fight against all attempts to that restrict a free discussion on the past or any other topic that is related to our life on this planet…

Some things are true and somethings are false. Jews were gassed and cremated in German concentration camps, the numbers may vary but not those facts. Why not say that?

Accomplices come in many forms.

(((They))) make (((themselves))) accomplices by:
• counsel
• command
• consent
• provocation
• praise
• silence
• assistance
• concealment
• defense
• excusing

Accomplices, too, must be prosecuted—even 90-year old janitors, (((their))) own precedent regarding “crimes against humanity,” even economic crimes against humanity.

Some things are true and somethings are false.

“Jews were gassed” FALSE.

“…and cremated in German concentration camps.” Indeed. Some were cremated.

You beg the question:

When some people die in a war that they started, how is that a “holocaust”? It seems more like “predictable outcome”—or even “just desserts.”

The Jewish Hand in the World Wars, Parts 1 & 2 by Thomas Dalton
http://inconvenienthistory.com/archive/2013/volume_5/number_2/the_jewish_hand_in_the_world_wars.php
http://inconvenienthistory.com/archive/2014/volume_6/number_2/the_jewish_hand_in_the_world_wars_part_2.php

said:
“Some things are true and somethings are false. Jews were gassed and cremated in German concentration camps, the numbers may vary but not those facts. Why not say that?”

– Simple. Because the impossible ‘gas chambers’ are a lie for which there is no proof.

– If millions of Jews were supposedly murdered and cremated, the why can’t you show us the human remains which are alleged to exist in those known locations?

– If the ‘gas chambers’ were factual then why do Jews engage in fakery like this:

U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum displays standard German air-raid shelter door, describing it as the door to a gas chamber at Majdanek
see text: http://www.vho.org/GB/c/DT/gcturen.html
images:

[MORE]

You allow pernicious horseshit to be told, do you not see the slippery slope.

Now that’s funny. Guess who promotes pernicious horseshit and wallows in it? Talk about a slippery slope!

Thanks for the laughs.

Those links don’t work for me.

Fortunately one can find them right here on UR. Many good comments as well.

Are you this Jacques Sheete

He was flippin damned right! Who among us cannot relate to the things he pointed out? This is probably the best post I’ve ever read anywhere, and thanks for reminding us of all that; I think it’s time I reread MK.

What a lonely life you must lead. So intellectually stimulating.
“Sorry got to go and reread MK, so interesting ”

What responses to you get? Of all things Hitler I do not know anyone interested in reading MK as a reference for life.

Are you fucking sadistic or just stupid.

Another thing: Jews weaponize the ‘Holocaust’ and use it against white countries — they could do themselves a big favor by stopping that.

Perceptions of Jewish suffering warrant the invasion of unlimited numbers of people into the US. Immigration and refugee policy is always seen by Jews in terms of Jewish interests and perceptions of the past, not what's good for most Americans. https://t.co/jFsqCwrLg9

— Kevin MacDonald (@TOOEdit) July 1, 2019

“Most Holocaust deniers are shunned from the world, David Irving can’t buy a lecture room anywhere in the world”

Just like no one can buy oil from Iran and you know why .

Freedom of expression is not a virtue or an abstract concept. Neither is liberty or prosperity or pursuit of happiness . These are not entities without contexts .These are salvation. These are not the smiles on the faces of the infants. These are not the songs of the birds of the paradise.

These are instruments and vehicles for illicit changes . These are the wars by other means. These are in the same league as are the sanctions, depleted Euranium and anthrax. The value changes in the eyes of the sheeple depending on who he or she is kowtowing to.

Gilad Atzmon said:
I am not historian and do not offer a view of the past.

This is bullshit. You have two choices, expose the holohoax or be considered another lying Jew.

I give Atzmon credits for letting the Anonymous Armchair Warrior spit such virtue-signaling prosecution. In real-life assessment, it appears you are prosecuting with almost the same asking than the one from Fran Taubman. How is it?

I give Atzmon credits for letting the Anonymous Armchair Warrior spit such virtue-signaling prosecution

Calling out the Jews is not virtue signalling, you blockhead !

I give Atzmon credits for letting the Anonymous Armchair Warrior spit such virtue-signaling prosecution

Calling out the Jews is not virtue signalling, you blockhead !

It is not the same brand of virtue. For sure.

Nevertheless, it is virtue signaling. You exhhibit yourself as the Courageous Warrior, not afraid to call out Gilad Atzmon. It makes you fell good, feel right, feel courageous.

Of course, I may be wrong.
You may be only a nervous Jew hater.
Or, an acomplice of Fran Taubman. What about your askings being same?

Or, an acomplice of Fran Taubman. What about your askings being same?

??? Learn English, you damned idiot. Your posts are gobbledygook, although, in truth, I don’t think it’s only a language problem.

Or, an acomplice of Fran Taubman. What about your askings being same?

??? Learn English, you damned idiot. Your posts are gobbledygook, although, in truth, I don’t think it’s only a language problem.

IF ( answer == (insults + attacks_about_language_proficiency ) )

THEN impotency_to answer_something_meaningful = TRUE

IF ( answer == (insults + attacks_about_language_proficiency ) )

THEN impotency_to answer_something_meaningful = TRUE

I’ve come to the conclusion that not only do you not know enough English to communicate effectively, that doesn’t really matter because you have mashed potatoes for brains. You contribute nothing but pure idiocy.

When you tell that my questions were not understandable, that means:
– either you are a true moron
– either you are faking dumbness, because my questions told some truth about your behavior, that you don’t want to discuss.

Make your pick.

Make your pick.

It’s ‘take your pick’.
There is a remarkable quote that often applies in discussions with Jews or the sycophants that I have used to end pointless discussions –

The more I argued with them, the better I came to know their dialectic. First they counted on the stupidity of their adversary, and then, when there was no other way out, they themselves simply played stupid.

However, I don’t think it applies here, my sense is that your stupidity is really endless? It’s 50/50 ! In any case, I’m done.

Gilad Atzmon said:
I am not historian and do not offer a view of the past.

This is bullshit. You have two choices, expose the holohoax or be considered another lying Jew.

I give Atzmon credits for letting the Anonymous Armchair Warrior spit such virtue-signaling prosecution. In real-life assessment, it appears you are prosecuting with almost the same question than the one from Fran Taubman. How is it?

It is not the same brand of virtue. For sure. Nevertheless, it is virtue signaling. You exhhibit yourself as the Courageous Warrior, not afraid to call out Gilad Atzmon. It makes you feel good, feel right, feel courageous.

Of course, I may be wrong.
You may be only a nervous Jew hater.
Or, an acomplice of Fran Taubman. What about your question being similar?

By the way, did you know that your derogatory comments, about my english languages proficiency, has no effect but demonstrating that:
– you don’t know one foreign language
– you are not a decent person, but a lowest level one
– you are cowardly and dishonestly looking for diversion from my questions. Since you never answered anything else related to them, my hypothesis are validated.

The below text is from your FB page. These are clear Holocaust deniers. Saying that the Gas chambers are fake. With an attached website entitled the HOLOCAUST LIES EXPOSED, on an underground website.

Why do you let people who deny the entirety of the Holocaust, not just the numbers of victims etc. (trim around the edges)?

What’s wrong with Holocaust denial?

The Holocaust is a Jewish Power manufactured narrative that fatally impugns itself by its shyness from open historical critique.

In real science fields, the spirit to which historical studies should aspire, such a situation as the Holocaust narrative would be immediately under suspicion of data corruption.

There is no history nor science that will stand in the long term that currently requires legal or social shielding from open and continuous critique.

Your complaints are vainly protesting that inviolable reality.

The only way that the Holocaust narrative would have survived without open revolt against it (which will eventually win, as all building revolts do) if it had been left to open critique.

To be subject to open critique and survive means that it would need to be true.

Protecting it from that critique, which truth does not fear, places it under immediate and perhaps irrevocable suspicion of falsehood.

Truth doesn’t make laws against its denial because it doesn’t need to. It always survives as self evident in the face of any denial that otherwise pales in comparison.

The West is accustomed to hundreds of years of science and democracy, and therefore politically oppressive untrue narratives that need to be shielded from open critique lest they fail stand out like sore thumbs.

Which is why you post here in the tone of a a histrionic fit. If your lie was ever left to open critique, imagine what would happen to you if it was proven to be a lie beyond a reasonable doubt? You consider that reality, and therefore so do we when we read your protests.

You people have continual financial and political power benefits to gain and therefore cannot be said to be objective boosters of the Holocaust narrative. You people have a non-universal moral belief system that prioritizes yourselves over others and therefore cannot be held to be fit arbiters of morality, to include the belief in a Holocaust narrative that you impose on others in this free society instead of allowing open debate (further raising the animosity against your group that is in itself an anathema to the melting pot standard of the United States).

What you should be worrying about is not the Holocaust. There is nothing you can say nor do to repress open discussion on the internet that is ever building, and your protests against such discussions read as craven.

What you should be worried about is this nation becoming Jew-fatigued to a fatal degree for your group. A large contingent of us are there. Do you think that things can go sideways for your group, here, merely due to accusations and evidence of child sacrifice or a corrupting influence?

To think as much would be parallel to the typical mistake of the psychopath who thinks that normal people do not see and remember patterns, trust their intuition in regard to the psychopaths pattern behavior over time (due to the negative effect on the normal person), and that normal people will not eject him from their lives, utterly exhausted, after a long trial of being subject to the psychopaths obviously corrosive effects.

In fact, that is wrong. Most people only successfully eject psychopaths from their lives when they become too exhausted to engage further. That is the risk to the Jews in this nation.

What plan does your group have to tamp back the ever-building effects of Jew fatigue? That is the central diaspora Jewish problem today.

Whatever that plan is, complaining about a lack of critique repression of a protected narrative that politically and financially benefits Jews, in our free society, has the opposite desired effects.

Holocaust denial is fine with me, you can deny it all you want. That was scarcely my point. Gilad does not want to be known as a denier, because he proposes to deal with scholarship and does not want to be know as a nut job hack as yourself.
So he prances around it. Go ahead and ask him straight up if he believes that Jews were gasses at Auschwitz. See what he says.
That was my point he lets deniers enter his chat spaces and says nothing and when confronted look at his answer. He plays games.
The Holocaust did happen it is proven with eyewitness, science and survivors.

Want to see a psycho look in the mirror.

A question for Gilad Atzmon, were Jews gassed at Auschwitz?

Why wasn’t Atzmon’s article from July 1, 2019, posted here on Unz?

https://gilad.online/writings/2019/7/1/when-jews-invoke-the-holocaust

The answer to Gilad’s battering-ram questioning of behaviour is obvious. What kind of “agendas” require the “divide and conquer” strategy to ensure success?

“[T]he Jewish community is thus in a position where it will be able to divide and conquer and enter into selective coalitions that support our agendas.” – Stephen Steinlight, CIS, Oct. 1, 2001 – https://cis.org/Report/Jewish-Stake-Americas-Changing-Demography

A really good question make him answer it.