RSS
As Mark Twain probably never said: “History doesn’t repeat, but it does rhyme.” Old patterns return in new forms, ancient errors and superstitions slide back into unsuspecting modern minds. It’s very unwise for liberals in 2018 to think themselves superior to the past, because in some ways they’re far inferior. If you believe in the supernatural and accept the existence of an immaterial, spiritual realm, there’s nothing irrational about also believing in miracles and witchcraft.
The irrationality of liberalism
Modern liberals reject the supernatural and embrace materialism. At the same time, they believe in miracles and witchcraft. This is highly irrational. As I described in “Dawkins’ Demon,” liberals scornfully reject the idea that a single human being, Jesus Christ, was miraculously born to a virgin about 2,000 years ago in a tiny region called Palestine. Instead, they fervently embrace the idea that billions of human beings have been miraculously born for many millennia over vast stretches of the earth’s surface.
This is because liberals believe that the human brain, unlike all other parts of the material body, was miraculously shielded from evolution when human beings migrated from Africa and entered new and often very different environments in Europe, Asia and the Americas. And liberals believe in a further miracle: that when some groups of Homo sapiensinterbred with distinct human species like the Neanderthals and Denisovans, the new genes they acquired had no effects on their cognition and psychology. Liberals know this because “There is Only One Race — the Human Race.” For many thousands of years all human beings, no matter how different their environments, have kept the same average range of cognitive abilities and psychological traits.
New ways of saying “witchcraft”
In short, liberals think that we’re all the same under the skin. And if some groups do less well than others in an advanced Western democracy, there can be only one explanation. Witchcraft! Liberals don’t call it that, of course. Instead, they employ terms like racism, sexism and Islamophobia. But the underlying concepts and psychology are the same as those that worked in ancient and medieval Europe. And that still work in many parts of the modern world. In Black Africa and the Black African diaspora, belief in witchcraft and magic is still widespread and powerful. Albinos and others are butchered for their magically potent body-parts in Tanzania and South Africa, sometimes while still alive. Adults and children are sacrificed to the spirits in return for material success and riches in Nigeria and Uganda.
Children are also sacrificed for those things in Western nations. In 2001, the headless torso of a young Black boy was retrieved from the river Thames in London. Named Adam by the British police, he had been poisoned and dismembered as part of a magical ritual. And the British police have spent a great deal of time and money trying to find his killers. The same police would also be eager to arrest anyone who said that migration by Black Africans into the West is a very bad idea. People who accept barbarisms like child sacrifice and child exorcism are not likely to be valuable citizens of a Western nation. And they’re not: Blacks in Britain hit the headlines for their criminality, not their contributions to science and high technology.
Whites are to blame
But they’re not to blame for this. When Blacks and other non-Whites in London fail at school, throw acid, and commit murder with guns and knives, this says nothing about non-White genetics and everything about White racism. After all, genes are material things, susceptible to scientific investigation and analysis. How could a mere chemical like DNA affect human cognition and psychology, which long ago slipped the surly bonds of matter and soared into the psychic empyrean? No, for secularist liberals it’s obvious that non-White failure and criminality must be blamed on the supernatural force of White racism.
That is certainly the only explanation on offer in an anti-racist investigation launched by the Guardian in December 2018. It carries the portentous title “Bias in Britain” and bewails such things as the way White men pass driving-tests at a higher rate than Black women. What more proof do you need that witchcraft at work? According to liberal ideology, human beings of all colours are the same under the skin, with the same cognitive abilities. Therefore non-Whites or women should succeed at exactly the same rates as Whites or men. If this doesn’t happen, then the more successful group must be guilty of racism or sexism. In the case of Black women and driving-tests, it’s both. Black women are the innocent victims of sexist racism and racist sexism.
Can such things be?
And the Guardian is horrified by this — or perhaps “titillated” is the better word. Stories about racism are served up in the Guardian and on the BBC rather in the way that stories about adultery are served up in the Sun and Daily Mail. Liberals enjoy the frisson of reading about ideological wickedness and sin. If those liberals are White, they can also indulge in righteous self-examination: “Am I a sinner too, harbouring wicked thoughts in my straying heart?” Liberalism doesn’t use the same words as an overt religion, but it’s a religion all the same. It manipulates its adherents in a religious way, exploiting their self-righteousness, preying on their guilt.
That’s why the Guardian has presented its readers with articles like “Racism in Britain: the stark truth uncovered.” And liberals throughout the British Isles have choked on their ethically sourced cornflakes and spilt their Fair Trade coffee. They’re horrified to learn that Black women are not passing their driving-tests at the same rate as White men. That non-Whites are “three times more likely” to be thrown out of bars and restaurants. That there are only two Black chefs in Britain with Michelin stars. That room-seekers with Muslim names get fewer replies. That the talented non-White actor Nish Kumar is sometimes mistakenly called Nish Patel.
Can such things be in the 21st century, fifty years after the Moon landings, decades into the Internet Age? Yes, they can and it’s a woeful indictment of this tiny island nation. But thought-criminals like me don’t answer that question – “Can such things be?” – in the same way as the good-thinkers like the Guardian. I’m dismayed not by the “racism” of 21st-century Britain, but by the superstition, dishonesty and statistical illiteracy of the Guardian and its readers.
Medieval witch-hunting in a new form
I think that modern anti-racism is medieval witch-hunting in a new form, with Whites playing the role of witches, heretics and general evil-doers. The Guardian ignores the abundant evidence that non-White failure is caused by such things as the lower average IQ and competence of non-Whites. After all, even those who deny the existence of race have to accept that marriage between close relatives is guaranteed to produce children with lower average IQs and many other pathologies of the brain and body. And guess what? Pakistani Muslims in British cities like Bradford and Birmingham have shockingly high rates of cousin marriage. The Guardian ignores this. The harm done by inbreeding is an objective scientific fact and the Guardian is not interested in objective scientific facts.
Instead, it’s interested in the immaterial and highly dubious concept of “unconscious bias.” According to the Guardian, “the concept is now essential to our understanding of racism.” It’s also essential to some people’s understanding of the “Evil Eye,” namely, the malevolent ability to cause accidents and death merely by looking at someone or something. Superstitious Italians believe that some people have the evil eye despite themselves. These unfortunate folk don’t intend to harm anyone, but their supernatural power manifests itself regardless. For example, Pope Pius IX was said to be a jettatore, or “caster (of the evil eye),” who brought disaster on the people and buildings he blessed. His evil eye was at work even though he wasn’t an evil person.
“I am a recovering racist”
That’s like the “unconscious bias” that assails non-Whites in the modern West. The superstition, irrationality and paranoia behind belief in the “evil eye” haven’t gone away. All these things are plainly at work in the Guardian’s “Bias in Britain” series. And the Guardian helpfully provides proof of this by running headlines like this: “We need to be eternally vigilant in the fight against racism.” Did a crime-thinking sub-editor chose that headline as a sly dig against the self-righteous posturing in the text below it? Quite possibly. Underneath the totalitarian headline, pious Guardianistas responded to the “Bias in Britain” series:
We were too inclined to believe that we had finally moved on. Bodies such as the CRE [Commission for Racial Equality], with its national responsibility to both campaign for racial equality and enforce the law, had its funding severely reduced as it became absorbed into a more general Human Rights Commission and lost its cutting edge. Community relations councils and units within local authorities fell away and large organisations became less committed to monitoring their performance. So there was a failure to recognise that eternal vigilance is required to maintain progress in this area of national life and we now witness a disturbing resurgence of far-right oppressive rhetoric and policy in many parts of Europe and beyond.
Michael Day, Chairman of the Commission for Racial Equality, 1988-93 (We need to be eternally vigilant in the fight against racism, The Guardian, 5th December 2018 – my emphasis)
That was the Guardianista Michael Day, looking back with fondness on his years as the well-remunerated Chairman of the CRE. But his self-righteous posturing was surpassed by another Guardianista:
Working for the Churches Commission for Racial Justice from 1987 to 1998, it became clear that racism is deeply rooted in British society both individually and institutionally. The latter emerged most visibly through the Stephen Lawrence campaign, which our commission supported, and was then rightly named by the inquiry. At individual level, those of us who are white who claim “I’m not racist” immediately give ourselves away. Racism is in the cultural air we breathe. The best we can say, taking our cue from Alcoholics Anonymous, is: “I am a recovering racist, and I am working on it.” Try saying it out loud, in front of a partner or friend. Then we need one area of institutional racism we can get to work on.
Rev David Haslam, Evesham, Worcestershire (We need to be eternally vigilant in the fight against racism)
Easily adapted to other eras
I suspect that a sub-editor chose the “eternally vigilant” headline to mock Michael Day and David Haslam. But maybe I’m wrong. Either way, the headline certainly reflects the way millions of liberals think about the horror of racism. They don’t have the self-awareness or the objectivity to reflect on how easily such headlines could be adapted to other eras and cultures. Think of medieval Europe: “We need to be eternally vigilant in the fight against witchcraft.” Or Stalinist Russia: “We need to be eternally vigilant in the fight against Trotskyist wreckers.” Or McCarthyite America: “We need to be eternally vigilant in the fight against communist subversion.”
But in fact it’s unfair to accuse Senator Joseph McCarthy of conducting an irrational witch-hunt against communists. Unlike witches, wreckers and racists in other eras and places, communists were a real force and a genuine danger in 1950s America. Spies like Julius and Ethel Rosenberg passed atomic secrets to the Soviet Union and were caught and executed. But many more spies went undetected and unpunished.
Is it good for Jews?
Like the Rosenbergs, a vastly disproportionate number of those spies were Jewish. Given a choice between a flawed liberal democracy and a mass-murdering dictatorship, those Jews chose the mass-murdering dictatorship and tried to bring communism to America. After all, the important thing about communism was not whether it would commit mass murder, but whether it would be “Good for the Jews.” The Rosenbergs thought it would be. So did the Jewish leaders of a revolutionary organization called Weather Underground in the 1960s:
They [the leaders of Weather Underground] also believed that their immediate responsibility would be to protect against what they called the counter revolution and they felt that this counter revolution could best be guarded against by creating and establishing reeducation centers in the Southwest where [they] would take all the people who needed to be reeducated into the new way of thinking and teach them how things were going to be. I asked, well, what is going to happen to those people that we can’t reeducate that are diehard capitalists and the reply was that they’d have to be eliminated. And when I pursued this further, they estimated that they would have to eliminate 25 million people in these reeducation centers. And when I say eliminate, I mean kill – 25 million people. I want you to imagine sitting in a room with 25 people most of which have graduate degrees from Columbia and other well known educational centers and hear them figuring out the logistics for the elimination of 25 million people and they were dead serious. (see Patriot Larry Grathwohl, 65, Infiltrated Weather Underground, Indicted Bill Ayers, The American Spectator, 24th July 2013)
Is it good for the Jews? That’s what matters, not mass murder, not truth or reality. This self-centred, self-worshipping Jewish attitude has influenced many ideologies through history. Communism is one, anti-racism is another. But communism and anti-racism go together, of course, because neither ideology cares about facts and logic, only about the acquisition and intensification of power. There is no mention in the Guardian’s self-righteous, pearl-clutching “Bias in Britain” series that some non-White groups do much better than the White average. Chinese, Hindus and Gujarati Muslims are all flourishing in 21st-century Britain. And Nigerian Blacks do much better than Somali Blacks.
Minority success in plain sight
If racism is the powerful and pervasive force alleged by the Guardian, how is this possible? Well, it isn’t, which is why the Guardian ignores the success of some non-White groups. When reality contradicts ideology, well-trained liberals don’t hesitate for a second. They simply censor reality and re-insist on ideology. But one censored aspect of reality is actually in plain sight in the Guardian’s series about racism:
Rebecca Hilsenrath, the chief executive of the Equality and Human Rights Commission, said: “Prejudice is still a very real problem in Britain and these findings demonstrate that it is having a significant impact on how real people behave and interact with others. Choosing a housemate is a personal decision and there are lots of reasons which play into it. As a barometer of today’s society, we should sit up and take notice if people are choosing who they live with based on where people come from, what they might look like and what they might believe. (Flatshare bias: room-seekers with Muslim name get fewer replies, The Guardian, December 2018)
… Hilsenrath, the ECHR chief executive, said: “We would always say in the case of unequal outcomes it’s important to look at total transparency, which is one of the reasons we have called for race pay gap reporting to be mandatory. It doesn’t reduce the gap but it starts a conversation.” Zubaida Haque, deputy director of the Runnymede Trust, said: “It’s an important process to start. It sends out a strong message to society. The reason it’s not enough is there are effectively no consequences to employers [of having a large race pay gap].” … Hilsenrath said the government had the power to set the example on tackling bias via the public sector. She said the current requirements for diversity in the public sector were non-specific but could be made more focused, creating “objectives to address the ethnicity employment gap”. (Bias in Britain: what can employers, the government and you do about it?, The Guardian, 7th December 2018)
The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) said on Tuesday it was aware of claims from some student groups that universities were “brushing incidents under the carpet unless they go viral on social media”. David Isaac, the organisation’s chair, said the inquiry would be looking at whether universities “have systems in place to stop racial harassment being a stumbling block to educational achievement and ensure that victims can obtain redress”. (Equality watchdog launches inquiry into racial harassment at universities, The Guardian, 4th December 2018)
Rebecca Hilsenrath and David Isaac, chief commissars in the Orwellian “Equality and Human Rights Commission,” are both Jewish (Isaac is also homosexual). Zubaida Haque is “deputy director of the Runnymede Trust,” an anti-White, pro-minority organization working hard to stir up racial and religious grievance. As I described in “Barons of Bullshit,” the Runnymede Trust was founded by two highly successful Jews, Anthony Lester and Jim Rose, who went on to found the anti-White, pro-minority Commission for Racial Equality.
Jews like Hilsenrath, Isaac and Lester are part of a very obvious but also very unmentionable pattern in the modern West: the vast over-representation of Jews at the upper levels of government, media, business and academia. Why is this Jewish success not held up as an example of how a once persecuted and powerless minority can triumph over discrimination and hate?
Jewish success disproves anti-racist ideology
It’s simple. Jewish success can’t be celebrated because it disproves anti-racist ideology and draws attention to Jewish power. If we’re all the same under the skin, why is the tiny Jewish minority so over-represented at the top? That is a forbidden question, because there’s no way to answer it within the rigid, anti-White parameters of anti-racism. An honest answer to the question would reveal that Jews practise ethnic nepotism, promoting other Jews and excluding Whites. It would also reveal that native British Whites are not “privileged” in modern Britain. If Jews are over-represented at the top, then native Whites are under-represented. But Hilsenrath and Isaac want to attack and undermine Whites, so they can’t celebrate themselves as examples of dazzling minority success.
As I said in “Blight unto the Nations”: “Jews are a minority when they wish to present themselves as victims. But [they] merge seamlessly into the White majority when it’s time to bash Whites for racism, prejudice and discrimination.” That’s the “dual nature of Jewishness.” Rebecca Hilsenrath exploited it when the Jewish Chronicle described her as “The woman with the ‘best job in the world’.” Jewish women are vastly over-represented in the liberal elite just as Jewish men are, but Hilsenrath claimed to be a victim despite her success and power:
The head of the Equality and Human Rights Commission [EHRC], the body which is charged with advancing equality and countering discrimination knows first-hand the problems women face in trying to get to the top. Rebecca Hilsenrath, a Cambridge law graduate, Mrs Hilsenrath had worked for five years for Linklaters, a leading London legal firm, before she took a break and had four sons in five years. When her youngest was two-and-a-half, she wanted to resume her career. “I was looking for a part-time opportunity. And I found that those are not so easy to come by in the private sector,” she says. “It was my first experience of what it’s like to be a woman looking for a senior role.” …
She joined the EHRC as chief legal officer in 2014 and within 18 months was acting chief executive. She landed the role permanently last October and describes it as “the best job in the world”. Invaluable to her career was her experience as a co-founder of the Hertsmere Jewish Day School, and then Yavneh College in Hertfordshire. She had a son in each of their first intake. … Since the Race Relations Act was passed in 1965, anti-discrimination law has greatly extended its reach. The EHRC’s casework includes backing successful legal action last year against a pub which refused entry to Irish Travellers. (The woman with the ‘best job in the world’, The Jewish Chronicle, 11th August 2016 / 5th Av 5776)
Hilsenrath seems to have had few problems getting to the top. And she doesn’t seem to care about occupying a position that should have gone to a non-White woman. As “a Cambridge law graduate” with “five years [at] Linklaters, a leading London legal firm,” she had enjoyed enormous privilege and success before she landed “the best job in the world.” But I don’t think Rebecca Hilsenrath and David Isaac really care about any minority except one: the minority to which they themselves belong. As “co-founder of the Hertsmere Jewish Day School, and then Yavneh College,” Hilsenrath must be a strongly identified Jew who constantly asks that eternal question: “Is it good for Jews?”
Harming Whites, helping criminals
“Anti-discrimination law” is good for Jews, but it isn’t good for Whites. The pub that “refused entry to Irish Travellers” undoubtedly had good reasons for doing so. In both Ireland and England, “Travellers” have a well-deserved reputation for violence, theft and amoral predation on outsiders. For example, the “UK family found guilty of enslaving homeless and disabled people” in 2017 were coyly described by the Guardian as being “based on Traveller sites.” In other words, they were “Travellers.” By helping this predatory and violent group, the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) is harming law-abiding and productive Whites.
But harming Whites is the raison d’être of anti-racist, pro-minority organizations like the EHRC. Recall this line in the Jewish Chronicle’s article about Rebecca Hilsenrath: “Since the Race Relations Act was passed in 1965, anti-discrimination law has greatly extended its reach.” I think that the greater “reach” of such law is sinister, not a cause for celebration. And who was behind the “Race Relations Act” of 1965? As I described in “Barons of Bullshit,” it was the Jewish lawyer Anthony Lester.
Jews like Lester and Hilsenrath are as energetic as they are anti-White, constantly working to undermine majorities and elevate minorities in Western nations. But Jews don’t do this in Israel, where the Jewish majority is firmly in control and laden with privilege. In Israel, Jews are determined to maintain both their control and their privilege for ever. They’re just as determined to lead a witch-hunt against Whites throughout the West.
English
Arabic
Chinese (Simplified)
Dutch
French
German
Hebrew
Hindi
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Russian
Spanish
Swedish
Turkish
Vietnamese
If you travel where people have dark skins, as a light-skinned person, you are a rock star. At least that is my experience as a man.
That is the immense irony of this witch hunt to me. A fat old white guy, if he takes more than five minutes to get laid in any of about 100 countries – he is a retard.
I can walk in places where they fall at your feet in groups of 20, it’s just crazy. Caressing your arms and face, telling you how they wish they had your skin. Your eyes. I know exactly what it feels like to be 18 and with a perfect body as a girl. Look how men just fall all over themselves. Laugh at everything you say, sit up tight against you, touch you inappropriately and push the bounds until you have to force them to stop. With two airplane legs and a motorcycle rental, I am Elvis Presley.
Then you go to the US or England or wherever white people produced fabulously wealthy socioeconomic conditions and… you are a pariah everywhere you look in the media: on television, in print, in movies and major programming. It is like a giant mind control experiment unless you just turn off the electronics and put down the paper.
You look out the window and no, there aren’t any white men beating up black people and terrorizing women. There are no protests with buildings burning and cars being overturned in ordrer to end oppression by white males.
How can the world I see with my own eyes be portrayed in such drastically opposite terms by media in rich white countries controlled primarily by… Jews?
Oh, I guess that question answers itself.
Yes. Before those who most mightily plied daggers and swords and rifles were at the wheel.
Now it’s those who lie and delude best.
Reading some of the blogs of the first group, one easily finds the occurred change to be a kind of advance.
I actually find this place very interesting and agreeable. I have a lot to say. Stay tuned.
Put a blonde fright wig on David Isaac and you have Jimmy Savile. He probably shares Savile’s sexual proclivities. If the Trotskyite problem in the U.S., Canada, and the U.K. is not resolved we face more corporate wars abroad and civil war at home.
Yes, this is definitely true. The PC Libs/Leftists/Liars at God awful places like The Guardian most definitely do believe in witches/evil wizards with supernatural powers to control the climate, change nature and make all the Black African and other righteous 3rd world people of color do bad things.
When there are obviously terrible bad things being done by and to various Black African oriented people and there are absolutely no White European people around, White Europeans are still to blame because they/we supposedly have these supernatural powers to change the climate and make the Black people do these things.
Such instances include
The Hutu vs Tutsi slaughters in Rwanda – who’s to blame?
(A fair person would point to the demagogue Hutu leaders that inciting Black Hutu mobs to take up machetes and slaughter Black Tutsi people)
But the Lib/Leftist/Liars at places like the Guardian argue that Evil White Racists are still to blame because….
“EVIL WHITE RACISTS CREATED A CLIMATE OF HATRED AND RACISM THAT MADE THE HUTUS SLAUGHTER ALL THESE TUTSI. BESIDES EVIL WHITE RACISTS WERE ONCE COLONIAL RULERS IN RWANDA AND THEY CREATED A CLIMATE OF……”
It was the same with the JFK assassination – JFK was killed by a Left wing, free Cuba, pro Castro Communist who lived in the Soviet Union. But…….
CBS anchorman Walter Cronkite pronounced that the Conservative White City of Dallas TX was to blame,
“HATE KILLED PRESIDENT KENNED”.
Nah, Cronkite lied.
White “Witches” Of Today Most Comparable To Original Christians
What Langdon says here in his article is eminently, largely true, of course–whites and their traditional Christian culture are the enemy, and it must be destroyed by satanists, satanists led by Jews, of course, Jews foremost satanists–just ck their filthy Talmudic religion. See Talmudical.BlogSpot.com, RevisionistReview.BlogSpot.com, and Come-and-hear.com for best Talmudic expo.
Thus Christianity features hero, Christ (= truth, Gosp. JOHN 14:6), who is God-the-Son (so u know he’s right and definitive) preaching against satanic Pharisees (among others, but Pharisees are leading heretics); see Gosp. JOHN 8:44.
So the large and general philosophic battle going on btwn Christ and Pharisees is TRUTH VS. LIES.
Thus Christ demonstrates ETHICS, most revered by Christians and many others among people, which ethics follow fm his metaphysics, which (barely implicit) metaphysics features OBJECTIVE (Aristotelian) reality, necessary basis of TRUTH–against the Pharisaic “midrash” and “Oral Law Tradition” which is thorough-going SUBJECTIVISM, extreme subjectivism.
Thus the philosophic battle is objective reality, basis of truth, vs. subjectivism, which subjectivism in extreme form is SATANISM, worship of death and lies. For note the subjectivist holds reality to be mere “construct”/product of mentality/consciousness, making subject God, the creator–satanism. Q.E.D.
Thus satanists hold their present political power specifically by means of satanistic central-banking, a criminal enterprise which is literally legalized counterfeiting by which they print-up (and digitalize) currency, not real money which is gold/silver, out of nothing–and then charge interest upon it. See Mises.org for expo; use their search engine.
But interest is just icing on proverbial “cake”–it would still work even if no interest was charged–the real problem is the (literal) counterfeiting–charging interest is mere side-issue used to distract/divert the debate.
Thus it’s this central-banking by which satanists hold and maintain their impetus by which they persecute truth, Christianity, and all humanity which defends truth, whites understood as primary and traditional Christians. But actually, don’t doubt, satanists, hence Jews, the leaders, are against ALL humanity (“Amalek”) in general, against truth, reason, etc.
Satanists and Jews are most effective as they’re premier COLLECTIVISTIC satanists/subjectivists, w. most effective “group-think,” co-operating most effectively, as they are most committed, dedicated, organized, and cohesive upon their group-think.
Hence these Jews (a) dominate the satanist contingent among satanists in general, the satanist gentiles, though more numerous, yet more individualist, un-organized, and un-connected, and (b) then, the satanists altogether, including Jews and everyone else, intimidating and manipulating the un-organized, distracted, un-witting people in general, as we see.
Note further, this satanism only prevails generally within a “mature” and degenerate, late-imperialist sort of culture, the culture in “Decline of the West,” by Oswald Spengler, Spengler describing the corrupt culture declining fm the original founders, like among the Romans, for example, but also Americans too, who were at first brave, heroic, and honest–OBJECTIVELY-oriented (Aristotle) in general philosophy.
But now, the degenerate offspring inheritors of the original culture and heroes generations have become corrupt, especially pretending to subjectivism and “moralism,” especially of non-existent “good-evil,” as we see, non-existent “good” upheld over TRUTH itself as highest ideal. Thus we see the irony that satanism is founded upon lies and frauds, like central-banking, including idea there’s such thing as “good,” “good” now worst enemy of TRUTH (= Christ).
What now must happen?–there are now simply tooooo many fools, suckers, and goons, over-populated, among the “people” who “BELEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEV” in this corruption and subjectivist delusion of “good-evil” including subjectivist idea that it (non-existent “good”) can actually exist if only one “beeleeeeeeeeeeeeeevs,” making themselves the false God, the supposed creators–satanism–even though the “people” imagine they’re “good” in so “beeeleeeeeevin’.”
Thus there must be strife and warfare, and that original Christian ideal of TRUTH, above all, must re-emerge. Presently too many fools imagine that idiot “beleeeeeeeeeeeevin’” is a virtue as they think mere “beleeeeeeeeeeeeevin’” can create reality in God-like fashion–as they’ve been taught it’s “good” to so “beleeeeeeeeeev.”
Note then the sublime purpose of Jews and satanists: they are the disease, like typhus and plague, that grows and spreads, which works to identify and eliminate the over-populated fools, suckers, inferiors, and weaklings among the people–and no “free-will” can possibly stop the process as reality is objective, determined (according to absolute cause-effect), and CYCLIC as Spengler noted.
In the real world, racism promotes human flourishing. The early white American slave owners had no trouble attracting young white women who wanted to marry them and bear their legitimate children. You probably couldn’t find an incel among them, because to many of the white women of the time, an average-looking white man who could keep a few Negroes in subjection and use them to make his farm productive probably looked like better-than-average husband material.
Except that, per census numbers, Jews owned a vastly disproportionate number of slaves vs. white gentiles.
Black researcher, Dr. Tony Martin, let’s us know who the prime sellers & owners of slaves really were, Jews.
Dr. Tony Martin – The Jewish Role in the African Slave Trade
Video Link
JEWS AND THE SLAVE TRADE : http://wethoughttheywerewhite.weebly.com/jews--the-slave-trade.html
Statue of Jew Confederate slave owner stands untouched in Florida : https://revisionistreview.blogspot.it/2017/08/statue-of-judaic-confederate-slave.html
Why anybody wastes his time on Guardian articles is beyond my comprehensension, unless one wants to know what motivates Guardian owner Soros.
Racism, as fascism, is hardly ever defined.
But let us define racism as something like ‘our group is the best, therefore we have the right to rule over all other groups’.
Now Muslims have ideas in this direction, all non Muslims are unbelievers, thus inferior.
But the Quran is tolerant towards unbelievers who behave well, according to Muslim rules.
Muslim rule in the Iberian peninsula and S France was preferred there by both christians and jews, at the time in comparison to christian rule.
The Ottoman empire was tolerant, non Muslim communities were to a large extent autonomous.
But if there is one intolerant racist group of people, is is jews.
They are the Chosen People, non jews are animals in the shape of humans, see ‘gentiles in halacha’.
Christianity made the jewish mindset clear, the problem thus is some 2000 years old.
Of course, christianity is not blameless.
But books about say the first five centuries CE have one overriding subject: jewish privileges.
Gustave E. von Grunebaum, ‘Medieval Islam, A Study in Cultural Orientation’, Chicago, 1946, 1971
James Parkes, ‘The Conflict of the Church and the Synagogue, A Study in the Origins of Antisemitism’, New York 1974
Solomon Katz, ‘The Jews in Visigothic and Frankish Kingdoms of Spain and Gaul’, Cambridge MA 1937
‘From prejudice to destruction’, Jacob Katz, 1980, Cambridge MA
This last book is the only one I know by a jew blaming modern antisemitism on jews.
Jacob Katz was an Israeli jewish historian.
” (A fair person would point to the demagogue Hutu leaders that inciting Black Hutu mobs to take up machetes and slaughter Black Tutsi people) ”
Belgian colonial rule caused the genocide, without, apparently, having thought about consequeces they introduced democracy in a society, where one group had ruled the others for hundreds of years.
I’ve been aware of the claims about race and intelligence for decades, but have never felt comfortable about “going there.”
The reason? I’m pretty sure – and this is a theme you can find in sci-fi like “The Man in the High Castle” – is that lower IQ would, in some people’s minds, justify extermination and genocide. The fact is that whatever the intelligence of a person, he or she is still tainted with original sin. Having a high IQ makes you prone to being a”clever devil,” in the words of CS Lewis.
The author of the article lays out for a white Christian like me what choices are open to an atheist. Whether the liberals prevail, or are beaten back by a (predictable) reaction, I fear the future is not something to welcome.
It’s rather late — the UK is already in many ways a totalitarian/Orwellian police state with a snitch culture of wrongthink suppression — children are being thoroughly indoctrinated in this — all sense of proportion and common sense has been lost: nearly daily there are articles about “racism” on the BBC Sports web site, even though in every football match there are many ‘players of color’, plenty of whom make tens of thousands of pounds (and more) per week — English men reacted passively to the shocking stories of the racially motivated sexual brutalization of underage English girls by foreign scum (probably not the kind of ‘hate’ that concerns Isaac) — the English will not be able to vote their way out of this (note the Brexit farce in this context) — they will have to fight — I see no hope/sign of that — they have foolishly allowed the government to have a near monopoly on weapons — the only reason there is hope for America is that “Americans” will never acquiesce to this — the problem in America is that the proportion of “Americans” is dropping fairly rapidly.
These liberals do not really believe that – they just say that – they are just telling a little white lie – a lie that they think will benefit mankind – they are being superior. The problem is that they are falsely leading us.
There is no need to lie. Cognitive ability is not everything.
They think that what they have in abundance – intelligence – is everything. There are other genetic traits that benefit society. Speaking genetic traits, cooperative genetic traits, empathetic genetic traits, social manner genetic traits. These traits come out of our brains just like cognitive ability does.
These other human traits must be given their due. They all must be evaluated when judging a human.
Not all modern liberals reject the supernatural, because I know of some self-proclaimed witches that cast spells to get them wealth. Don’t know if it works, because I tend to stay away from self-proclaimed witches, since I have no idea if they’re telling the truth about being into the good witchery and not the Black Magick thing.
Then there’s rock stars like Jay-z–worth around 900 million–who brags about worshiping Lucifer. And now we also have the bimbo Miley Cyrus telling her fans if they want to become rich and famous, worship Lucifer.
No wonder suicides in the USA are at an all time high. It’s gotten so damned crazy since Trump became president, that some people could no longer handle all the hate being directed at him and others. As an example, look to Twitter, where many of the tweets are like watching a beef bone being tossed into a caged pack of feral dogs. So much hate and so little sanity.
Plus the constant threat of terrorist attacks and seeing how Wall Street is robbing us blind and leading us into another stock market crash, which will make the one of 1929 seem mild, is enough to make damn near anyone become desperate, despondent and check out.
The only discrepancy with the article I can see so far is that it’s certainly not just liberals who believe that cognitive ability is determined by magic. Conservatives are only slightly less guilty. What elected conservative politician in the US or the UK is a race realist? What pundit at Fox News? What contributor to NRO, Reason, or Instapundit? Do more than 10% of Boomer aged conservatives accept the position of race realism? Not in my experience.
By definition, conservatives should be the race realists, but the people who currently make up that group are neither. They are controlled opposition, unknowingly duped due to a cradle to the grave disinformation agenda.
Good question.
The topsy-turvy world of Jewish inward-fixated, neurotic, guilt-wracked, anti-White, hate-filled religious insanity, cultural corruption, moral perversion and demonic malice.
“Woe to those saying to evil ‘good,’ And to good ‘evil,’ Putting darkness for light, and light for darkness, Putting bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter.” – Isaiah 5:20
“I have known … the evil-speaking of those saying themselves to be Jews, and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan” – Revelation 2:9
“The bimbo Miley Cyrus – “discovered”, trained, “mentored”, managed, molested and fucked by a degenerate paedophile Jew, Larry Rudolph”.
“Unlike witches, wreckers and racists in other eras and places, communists were a real force and a genuine danger in 1950s America. Spies like Julius and Ethel Rosenberg passed atomic secrets to the Soviet Union and were caught and executed. But many more spies went undetected and unpunished.”
Not to mention: Alger Hiss, Harry Dexter White, Lauchlin Currie, plus an illustrious assortment of phil0-Communist very high up — Harry Hopkins, Henry Wallace, and good ole Eleanor, herself. FDR pretty much handed off the “car keys” to the Commies.
How Britain stole $45 trillion from India
And lied about it.
https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/britain-stole-45-trillion-india-181206124830851.html
Well at least some have a conscience.
(((David Isaacs)))
Every. Buppin. Time.
Can see The Horror Penguin’s strings: installed at the explosion in the fagash factory!!!
the jews succeeded beyond their wildest wet dreams of convincing WHITE people the worst thing in the universe is racism. it is the whites including fake conservatives who want to root out every racist in the galaxies. 75% of whites hate whites more then the non whites do
Other than the dubious accounting in that “study”/ libel, it also forgets that tax can be paid in goods and services rendered. As it was in the feudal system.
This means that the opening question as regards “theft” is not how much direct tax, barter taxes and duties India paid in order to have government but whether those payments matched the cost of said govermment including the defence of that government. Given that Britain was utterly bankrupt by the time India was gifted independence, this is extremely unlikely.
One might argue that India should have had national self-determination but that is an entirely different argument and the possible sin of imperialism should not be conflated with absurd claims of theft. Especially since those absurd claims are no doubt motivated by an Indian desire to continue the colonisation of Britain and to extort resources from the nation which created modern agriculture, industry and services – the real root of Britain’s far greater individual wealth.
i don’t see anyone arguing for that even while the low IQ African population is exploding
what is that? something made up so you will be eternally in moral debt to a religion?
yes, a murderer is for some reason about equal morally in their eyes to someone who just notices the differences
wow, just like in slavery, let’s see (((who))) got rich and begin expropriating from them
Monsanto?
Sassoon?
Jilles,
That is a surprsingly dull-witted comment, you may be better to sleep it off, btw, merry Christmas, par coeur.
I’m not in debt to anything. “Original sin” is a Christian way of describing what even the dumbest of atheists must have noticed: the human tendency to do evil things.
Indeed, the article is more Marxist nonsense.
India never had it so good.
It is also interesting to note that the majority of extremely liberal/Marxist white women like Hilary Clinton who were born with mousy brown hair and brown eyes have spent a fortune to change themselves into blue eyed blondes with the use of contact lens and blond dyes or wigs. It seems odd that people who spend their entire days denouncing white people strive so to appear Aryan. Ninety percent of the female celebrities and news readers use cosmetology to appear as if they are whiter than snow and this includes many black women as well. They are indeed schizo and mentally ill.
quoted:
“the jews succeeded beyond their wildest wet dreams of convincing WHITE people the worst thing in the universe is racism. it is the whites including fake conservatives who want to root out every racist in the galaxies. ”
It should say that ‘the Jews & their fake 6M succeeded beyond their wildest dreams after previous claims which go back as far as 1823’.
Face it, it’s the ridiculous, fake, & impossible ‘holocaust’ narrative which allows Jews the freedom to roam wild. There will be no change until that fraud is rejected.
Dr. Robert Faurisson: A Freedom Fighter to His Last Breath: https://www.unz.com/article/a-freedom-fighter-to-his-last-breath/
http://www.codoh.com
if you find yourself doing evil things all the time, get therapy
We need to go on the offensive by pointing out Synagogues have zero ethnic diversity. Compare that to Christians who have all Black congregations along with Asians, Latinos, etc. having all been accepted into their club.
Yet somehow the oldest of the Abrahamic Religions hasn’t embraced diversity. This is a point that we can do a lot of damage if we push this narrative over the next couple of years. Infiltrate Left leaning sites and bring this up. Point it out when having a political conversation with family and friends.
Required doctrine today: everything done by Whites is evil, all the food and medicine and everything else we produced was done by “mankind.”
Anything bad a non-white does is due to some evil thing a White person (ie: a real person responsible for his own actions), did to them.
Allow me to throw a big block of ice on the table for all of those bigoted Europhobes…..
https://wethoughttheywerewhite.tumblr.com/
Read it and weep…………
Excellent article and a perfect sum up of what all decent, western people are up against. It’s hard to imagine how peaceful protest and speech will get us out of this, especially since many of us aren’t even allowed to speak…
Dumbass: “original sin” refers to condition of human self-interest which follows fm human will. Thus as humans possess will they’re necessarily self-interested, as even animals heed to self-preservation. But we see u urself have rec’d “therapy,” evidently, as u recommend it to others, eh? Tsar Nick: sorry my response to urs, earlier, wasn’t deemed worthy of publication due to Jew editor, hoh o ho.
What is interesting is that many people will claim that the Khazars are whom are referred to here. However the Khazars converted in the 8th century.
What IS quite telling is that, the ‘Tribe of Dan’ are Danish and Irish people….
Were the Tribes of Israel really ‘Jews’ at all ?
Loneliness has a cure but you have to want to help yourself first, little troll.
I tried to write an effective comment on this article but can’t because I have discovered, to my sorrow, that I’ve completely worn out the parentheses keys on my keyboard.
This saddens me because I’m having to face the ugly reality that Whites are the target of a outright war of extermination.
I hate living in the middle of History being made.
We must be eternally vigilant against Jewishness.
I don’t care if someone is born into a Jewish family, provided that he does not identify himself as Jewish. In fact, allegiance is what really matters, but it matters an awful lot.
By the way, Happy Christmas to you all.
A good looking white man can get laid anywhere just as any good looking black, brown, red and yellow men but a fat-guck, no matter his color won’t get anywhere near a pussy save his feline companion, let alone in a hundred countries… you ought to call yourself Bullshit Bob!
The link to Gujarati Muslims leads to an article which is all about the successful Hindoos… what gives, author?
Pakis inbreeding… Why is that surprising? Not only their god is Arab but their matrimonial practices are also of the desert. There is no saving those morons!
I find this kind of exposition of white genocide painful and pointless. We don’t need to go into the depressing details to understand what is happening to the European people.
Europeans have clearly been slated for extermination by a combination of depressed fertility, dysgenic breeding, and demonization leading to self-hatred and self-destruction.
Why? Because the European nation states, still among the most powerful on earth, must be destroyed to make way for global governance, which is to say rule by the Money Power over a mongrelized race of lesser beings who are to be used, abused and, as thought fit, exterminated, at will.
The mechanism of European genocide? Anti-racism. Everyone loves to hate, and the state in the embodiment of Thereason May and the rest of the Treason Party have set up Europeans to be hated, especially white males, who are to be replaced by those of another color as mates for white women.
Is it really necessary to say more about what’s happening? What’s needed is counteraction. To every white male it needs to be said “get a yellow jacket.” And to every white woman over 25 without a white child, should be presented a white feather. Folks could start here, the bracketed bitch who wants to castrate all white males and feed their testicles to swine.
Ah, but think of the number of flush toilets you could buy with all that money. Indian’s would no longer have to shit in the streets.
It’s all the honkies fault.
its just another scam to control people thru guilt and shame
feel free to believe in it though
The best recipe is in Wyndham’s “The Day of the Triffids”. If you make everyone blind, they would become color-blind, too, and racism would end.
May 5, 2016 The Myth of Authority
This video, created and submitted by”GeoShifter,” was the winner of the recent video contest, to see who could make the best video to go along with the narration.
Video Link
CNN not commenting on Don Lemon’s remark about white men
https://www.twincities.com/…/cnn-not-commenting-on-lemons-remark-about-white-m…
Oct 31, 2018 – CNN isn’t commenting about Don Lemon’s statement that white men represent the biggest terrorist threat in the country and we have to do something about them. Don Lemon. Lemon’s …
I am really, really tired of this crap.
It seems some people really want to be our enemy and they are counting on our own government to marginalize us.
is it because they want your money?
you’re a doofus
There was an ethnic and religious component to the witchcraft craze. Witches were often associated with enemy groups: protestants or Jews in the catholic countries and vice-versa, also Ottomans, Gypsies, and even a surviving rural Celtic substrata that was not fully Christian.
It is the same today: the ‘racist’, ‘nationalist’, homophobic witches are linked with Russians or other groups that have already been demonised. It is a natural progression: first they are silenced, then ostracised, and then the real fun starts. But I suspect by then, the active anti-white brigades will be the actual non-whites brought to Europe. You cannot train 1-2 generations of already angry outsiders with generally low IQs in anti-white hatred without consequences. They will naturally take it to the next level.
Excellent article.
how about you stop the Talmudic nit-picking:
a Jew is a
Jew is a
(((Jew)))
You obviously never read the book.
It is quite racist, those still able to see took over society.
Those blind the seeing could support became second class citizens, the others perished.
When using words as racist, fascist, nationalist, begin by explaining your definitions of the words.
Racism is no more than man as a herd animal, those in a herd, any herd, are convinced their herd is the best.
Do really people exist who do not understand that between whites there is also racism ?
It just has another name: social ladder.
It’s hard to critique the UK from the vantage point of the US. Their history with b lacks is far longer and has a much richer and deeper dynamic.
I for one applaud their desire to take on their previous failures head on.
However, I don’t think they need to dump their identity to do so.
Anyone who knows anything about the history of the Indian subcontinent can wonder if the Indian people were better, or worse off under European colonialism, compared with the pre colonial era when Indian rulers fought each other all the time.
The human rights ideas of these precolonial rulers differed from the ideas of the colonial rulers.
You wanna be with rockstars, you wanna be a rockstar, you wanna believe you have rightful reasons behind your envy of rockstars.
What’s unclear?
The ideological and mediatic anti-Whitism is easy to explain as well.
Two curious examples:
1. the article contends to murders by religious ritual and then cites as example a case in which the police have no suspects and no motive, yet the case is noted as the result of religious sacrifice — yet there’s no evidence of any such thing.
2. The article tackles inter-familial marriages as to some nonwhite failing. And one has to laugh given that the entire history of Great Britain was heavily founded on familial relationships so as to maintain royal bloodlines and power.
Both of those examples seriously undermine the credibility of what is being advanced. There are other failings, but the above were sufficient to challenge the efficacy and the intent of the article itself.
There is no doubt that soon as truth on gender/race differences is officially declared, discrimination becomes official policy.
As Stanislaw Lem wrote in his Solaris, there are the twin drives to attack what is not understood and what is different (from the self and its projections like “group” “family” and ao on).
Moreover: you can’t keep together any people while telling openly the truth about their differences in skills. Communal life exacts that the usually latent subconscious forces of envy, pride, vanity, be kept in their state of latency.
There is no actual just solution to any perplexity involving humans, either individually or in groups however numerous.
Despite the thousands of books on your reading list, your knowledge of the Muslim occupations of European countries is completely wrong.
Since you think living under a Muslim occupation is so wonderful, why don’t you and your daughters move to Rotterdam or some other Muslim occupied Dutch city and experience it?
Sorry to disappoint, I did read that book (when I was much younger).
Social ladder is not racist if social position is based on merit. That’s pure theory, though. The money is inherited, and those most interested eliminated the inheritance tax in the US.
So 5o years after Belgium left Rawanda the Belgians sent evil mind control rays to Africa and the helpless Africans slaughtered each other because of mind control rays??
And exactly which Belgians sent the mind control rays?
After 2000 years persecuting witches…
Slaughtering low IQ people would mean no restaurant workers no farm workers no janitors no affirmative action government workers and no 75IQ blacks and 85IQ Hispanics to provide employment for teachers school administrators social workers cops prosecutors judges and prison guards
The American economy would crash as millions of cowboys that herd the dummies around from birth to death are laid off.
A better question is did they exist at all?? They are only mentioned in that book of myths and fairy tales.
Muslim mayor of London has ordered the London police to end “racial inequality “ in data base of gang members convicted of felonies
It seems that 80 percent of the men in that data base are black!!! Quelle surprise !!!
Head line in the Guardian. Another editorial Britain must atone for its sins against its colonies. But not a word about what England did to Ireland Scotland and Wales for a thousand years.
There was a lot of investigation about the little boy Adam found beheaded with limbs cut off st the time.
A very common form of African witch craft is cutting off limbs above the joint as joints have magical powers. He hadn’t been beaten so it wasn’t parents who bear him to death and dumped the body
There was no record of a 2 year old black boy disappearing from the welfare rolls.
The British authorities don’t do much about smuggling of bush meat and other things from Africa to Britain, but they are very aware of it and have informers everywhere.
What with the investigation and publicity no more human sacrifice bodies were ever found That means the witch doctors stopped because of the investigation or became better at disposing of the bodies
Ask Mr google. There are many articles.
Women can’t conceive children by themselves Oh well, it’s Christmas guess you believe that virgins can conceive and bear babies without sperm involved
It is absurd this snitch culture as you put it.
The goodwhites today really are modern day book burners and witch hunters.
How can anyone respect such leftist fools?
I don’t. It’s a hard path to change everything.
I have come to the conclusion that enacting of the so-called “civil-rights” acts were mistakes. The more “rights” these black bastards demand, the more they complain and make demands not available to whites. When whites become a “minority” in our own country, do you think the “civil-rights” acts will benefit us? I think not…
When whites become a minority, this country is finished. All one has to do is look at Zimbabwe, South Africa, and other black-run “basket cases”. This is our future…
That being said…
The term “racism” was invented by communists, and is used to destroy cultures and defuse (and render impotent) those with differing points-of-view on “racial” issues.
True “racism” is desirable as it merely cements cultural and social bonds that are necessary for a society to function and flourish.
True “racism” merely denotes commonality of purpose and advancement within each respective racial group.
Blacks have the NAACP and Congressional Black Caucus, Hispanics have La Raza and Mecha, Jews have the $PLC, ACLU and ADL. These are all “racist” organizations that serve to promote the interests (and political power) of their respective races.
It is only whites who are castigated and threatened for attempting to show any signs of racial solidarity.
Let’s look at what us “evil, privileged” whites have done for Western society and the world:
1. “Civil-rights (for some)” laws (that effectively destroy “freedom of association” for whites, but not for other races) and do not apply to whites–only “people of color” are covered by these so-called “civil-rights (for some)” protections.
2. “Affirmative action” policies (that push better qualified whites out of positions and jobs that they would ordinarily qualify for) in favor of lesser-qualified minorities. In fact, “affirmative action” policies actually damage those minorities who are quite capable of “making it on their own” because they get “lumped in” with the groups that cannot make it on their own without “help”,
3. “Contract set-asides” (that are specifically targeted for minorities (that white people are prohibited from bidding on) and immigration policies (that specifically exclude whites, most of who have skills that would benefit the USA) in favor of those from the third-world (with no marketable skills).
4. Scholarships that specify particular ethnic groups are looked upon favorably by most people, save one–scholarships that are intended for whites only are looked upon as being “racist”, and therefore impermissible and improper in today’s racially-charged climate of “political correctness”.
NO OTHER RACE (BUT WHITES) HAS (EVER) BENT OVER BACKWARDS to assure that all non-white races receive a “fair shake” in being a part of American life, even to the detriment and social well-being of “our own kind” (whites).
Whites possess an externalized altruism that no other races possesses. This externalized altruism that “looks out for the other guy” will be the demise of the white race. This altruism needs to be internalized and focused inward, just as other races have done. There is NO SHAME in looking out for one’s own kind.
For the record, when I am called “racist” for expressing my views, I thank my accuser(s) profusely and “thank them for noticing”. The confused, bewildered looks on their faces is priceless.
I blame those of the “greatest generation” for selling out our birthright with the passage of the “Civil-Rights Acts” of 1957 and 1964, and the “Hart-Cellar immigration act of 1965”. To those of the “greatest generation” (who are still alive) thanks for NOTHING…
Let’s not forget that “freedom of association” (but only affecting the white majority) was eviscerated by the enacting of these clearly unconstitutional acts.
As whites comprise only 6% of the world population, it is us whites who should be the most protected and cherished of minorities…
“Multiculturalism” and “diversity” are code-words for white genocide.
White people, and in particular white Christian males, should study the 1917 Bolshevik Russian revolution with particular attention paid to the 50+ millions of white Christians who were murdered or enslaved under the Bolsheviks (75% Jews). Why? Because they’ll so do it again, anywhere they get the opportunity. As the author described, the Weathermen, an under ground revolutionary group formed in 1960’s America, had plans to murder 25 millions here, at a time when our population was less than 150 million.
This same group is behind efforts to get rid of the 1st and 2nd amendments. Stop voting for Jews, boycott Israel (BDS), turn your TV off, and raise your voice again hate crime laws. It’s that simple.
I have no clue whether the death of this young boy was religiously motivated as some kind of sacrifice. It may very well be the case, but I like a little evidence with my crime motive.
But suppose that’s accurate, it is hardly a sign of rampant religious motivated crime spree on the loose as the author suggests.
the motive here is speculative.
Another reason for severing bodies is to avoid identification.
So?
There’s plenty of overheated, maudlin grievance-mongering from those parts too.
Bizarre fiction.
Jews have done great harm to all the nations of the west. This is a fact. They are also extremely hypocritical.
The mother of all brain washing are the unopposed media code gag orders that restrict TRUE speech as explained in the blog SINCERITY.NET
This is why the obvious cannot be seen by the normal citizen, subject to constant misinformation.
In a non-witchcraft scientific world we must not have taboo topics and mandatory repression of TRUE speech.
PresseKodex #12.1, blatantly mandates restrictions to true speech based on color of skin (“minority” membership, in violation of non-discrimination mandate section #12)
1) it is not permissible to refer to the [crime] suspect‘s religious, ethnic or other minority membership 1 [GUIDELINE 12.1. by the German Press Council German Press Code]
>> that is TRUE speech is not allowed, like “black robs white”
The following seemingly innocuous media code rules #2 to 4 appear neutral, on the surface. These regulations mandate to withhold true information and thus the press code restricts true speech.
True speech is not permissible, restricted by a variety of media code regulations. Even we were unaware of this multitude of true speech restrictions, until we read the sanctions and reprimands of the German and Austrian Media Council.
sincerity.net/sensational-violence/
2 “The Press will refrain from inappropriately sensational portrayal of violence, brutality and suffering” [German PresseKodex #11];
>> the brutality of the real outside world will not be known to the liberal in a protected privileged safe environment.
3 “preservation of human dignity” [German PresseKodex #1];
>> also an excuse to hide the cruelty of the outside world in other countries and continents
4 “the Press must exercise especial restraint reporting crimes committed by young persons” [German PresseKodex #13.3];
You obviously have no idea how colonialism continued after the end of colonialism
” Social ladder is not racist if social position is based on merit. ”
The problem in a few words: who is the judge of if social position is based on merit or on discrimination, to use another word for racism ?
Non white Dutch, in my opinion, blame anything in their lives that does not please them on racism.
That they’re simply too stupid cannot be true, of course.
Dutch railways screen applicants for jobs by psychological tests, it leaked out that those with migration background score significantly lower.
Dutch police schools seem to have lowered their standards in order to make it possible that we get more police with migration background.
Non whites thus want diversity rules, organisations must be obliged to accept a minimum % of employees with migration background.
At universities one sees the consequences.
These differences in capacity also are the reason of the anger against scientific studies into IQ etc differences between groups.
‘Down with white supremacy’, great slogan, but what if we whites are supreme ?
THE, in my opinion, example of what happens if white supremacy no longer is allowed to exist is South Africa: poverty, corruption and barbarism.
what percent was it?
and what percent were the jews in Russia?
too bad they don’t have an equivalent to holohoax industry working full time to put out the propaganda yet
Sounds familiar. In the USSR there was so-called “national recruitment” that was supposed to increase “diversity”, whereby underqualified people from other Soviet republics and autonomous republics within Russian Federation got accepted to the Moscow State University, bypassing the regular entrance exam competition (in my year it was more than 13 applicants per slot for honest people). That’s exactly what the “affirmative action” in the US is. There were quotas for various regions. The result was predictable: most of those “recruits” did not even pass the tests after the first semester and dropped out. Luckily, because of that their effect on the quality of student body was minimal.
Naturally, I mean real merit. That would disadvantage not only unqualified blacks and Latinos (as a matter of fact, East and South Asians are not officially considered minorities in the US, as they tend to be qualified and do well w/o), but unqualified whites, as well (Bush Jr is a good example of a perfectly white moron who was accepted by Yale). Naturally, when “diversity” for the sake of diversity is the goal, objective measures (here I don’t mean the IQ test, I do not belong to the IQ sect) become taboo. I must say that in my experience neither skin color nor gender correlates with abilities. I’ve seen morons and capable people of every color, male and female. My very best tech was a black girl from Cameroon. She was smart and hard-working and earned the authorship on three papers in less than two years. My worst graduate student was a white guy who earned authorship on three papers (as a direct result of my relentless ass-kicking) in four years. I had very smart and diligent Chinese grad student and a post-doc, but I also had another Chinese post-doc who tied for being the dumbest with a perfectly white guy. She was more diligent, though.
It is only natural that stupid and lazy people try to blame anyone but themselves for their failures. If a stupid and lazy person happens to be non-white, “racism” becomes a natural culprit. When similarly unqualified people were Jewish in the USSR, they blamed antisemitism for their failures. That’s how the myths are created: every nation has very few really capable people, so the rest are blaming something, and when they happen to be non-white or Jewish, they blame “discrimination”.
You are obviously talking about averages. You are likely right in that, but averages have no predictive value: an individual of any color, gender, and religion (or lack thereof) can be a star or trash. In every nation and race trash outnumbers stars by about 10:1.
The quickest ever memoryholing of a comment was when I asked, after an article on the evil deeds that whites perpetrated, was why it is OK to refer to Native Americans but never Native Europeans.
Gone in 60 seconds.
made some sense until this:
Then you likely do not have much experience working with people of various origins. When you do research, life forces you to do that. You either judge each person on his/her own merits, or shoot yourself in the foot (and then complain that it hurts). Out of 18 postdoctoral fellows, 7 graduate students, and 48 undergraduates I had in the lab, the numbers of white Americans were: one, three, and ten. What’s more, only my best graduate student was white American (a female, BTW). The best post-docs and undergrads were either non-white, or non-American, or both. If I hired only white Americans, or even only whites of any origin, I’d be nowhere in science and unemployed. Reality is a harsh mistress.
So, you don’t agree that averages have no predictive value? Let me give you a simple example. An average American is a nice person, who loves his country and has common sense. Yet American politicians at least since 1991 (maybe even before that) behave like deranged bandits internationally, throwing common sense to the wind and damaging America more than all its enemies put together. Does the average predict that? Of course not.
Racist is a codeword for White person. They want to eliminate all Whites from the galaxy.
I don’t think corruption can be linked to race! There are too many examples of corrupt mono-ethnic countries for that, and from all parts of the world. For example, in about 1700, Samuel Pepys bought the position of Secretary to the (British) Navy, for IMMSMC, £50,000 an enormous sum at the time, and all his friends said words to the effect of: “Christ! What a bargain you got there!” At the time Britain was entirely dominated by white men.
China is largely Han, but it has been extremely corrupt for a long time and even though Xi Jinping has been weeding out corrupt officials at a tremendous rate there are still many left.
you’re an idiot who believes what he wants to
which one is corrupt, the one who sells it or the one who buys it? or both?
what kind of a name is “samuel pepys”?
When people run out of arguments, they switch to name calling. Boring.
i didnt run out of arguments
you have to staff an IT company and you have a choice to hire 100 mexicans or 100 chinese – who do you hire?
remember, averages have no predictive value
If I have to hire 100, averages matter. Then for an IT company I’d hire 100 Chinese. If I hire one, averages don’t matter at all. I hire individual people one by one. And then have to fire some.
when semitic trash fake-religion and their zombies persecuted ”Whites” cultural witches /”pagan” ”whites”.
when you have tens of millions of mexicans and other assorted trash streaming over the border averages matter there too
If you have large masses, averages matter, as they describe those multitudes. My point was that averages do not predict the qualities of an individual. That’s all.
“the only reason there is hope for America is that “Americans” will never acquiesce to this — the problem in America is that the proportion of “Americans” is dropping fairly rapidly.”
Would that it were so. Unfortunately the mass influx of third world opportunists is not the only reason “Americans” are growing scarce. Millions more have pledged total allegiance to the Party and the alien and wish ill on any countrymen who reject the notion that they should be subjugated to either. There is a sense that many of us are quietly waiting.
There are huge differences between nations.
The Tsjechoslovaks expelled the Sudeten Germans.
Quite interesting to read how the Tsjechs were unable to keep the industries going.
As far as I know no book exists on German scientific and technological progress since Germany exists, 1871.
The USA Manhattan project employed 30.000 people, three German scientists in early 1945 were quite near to an operational hydrogen bomb.
´Als die Deutschen weg waren, Was nach der Vertreibung geschah: Ostpreussen, Schlesien, Sudetenland’, 2005, 2007, Reinbek, Adrian von Arburg, Wlodzimierz Borodziej, Jurij Kostjaschow, Ulla Lachauer, Hand-Dieter Rutsch, Beate Schlanstein, Christian Schulz
Rainer Karlsch, ‘Hitlers Bom, Hoe Nazi-Duitsland nucleaire wapens testte in een wanhopige poging om de oorlog te winnen, Tielt, 2005 (Hitlers Bombe, München)
Richard Ollard, ‘PEPYS, A Biography’, London 1974
Pepys wrote a diary, to keep it secret he even invented a writing system.
As to corruption, buying and selling offices were considered honest transactions at the time.
Forgot when the British army stopped selling officers positions.
At the time governments had few technical possibilities of raising money.
total allegiance
I think it is closer to being ‘a mile wide and an inch deep’ than it is to being “total” — recently I saw someone put it this way: ‘Liberals always say “educate yourself” — but whenever I do, I end up being more alt-right.’
I don’t think corruption can be linked to race!
It is, or appears to be, in part.
If memory serves, there were more than three German scientists working on Manhattan project.
Also, I believe the great majority of those 30,000 worked on uranium enrichment, very few on actual design.
BTW, “nearly operational” sounds like “nearly pregnant”, does not make much sense.
Awkward questions:
1.Who funds Transparency International (as we all know, he, who pays the musicians, calls the tune).
2. The laws in the US make a lot of corruption perfectly legal (e.g., campaign donations, PAC funding, retired general going onto boards of Pentagon contractors, etc.). Similar things exist in the UK: BAE Systems bribery case (or, rather, the absence of prosecution of BAE Systems for obvious criminal acts) is typical. The fact that these things are legal, or that the law looks the other way, does not make them less corrupt.
Read the book
I’m always deeply impressed by people who know a book without having read it.
Nearly operational in this case, some test explosions went well, others failed.
If you had any idea about how difficult it is to get hydrogen fusion circumstances with ordinary explosives, you’d understand.
Ideas of what corruption is are not the same in all cultures.
Even within the Netherlands ideas of corruption south and north of the big rivers are not the same.
they do, its just not as easy to see in 1 compared to 100
your applicants were not a random sample, they were self-selected, cream of the crop – they don’t represent the typical of their race
“…no book exists on German scientific and technological progress since Germany exists, 1871.”
— Agree that this should be fixed. German civilization is wondrous, often magnificent. The work ethics of Germans is the keystone for their success in all fields of human creativity.
Of course not, the typical representatives of any race flip burgers, trim bushes, or lay bricks at best. My point was that the extremes, both upper and lower, in any race are about the same: bright stars and complete morons. Therefore, different averages do not predict the qualities of a particular person. I am not arguing with a fact that the averages differ.
Of course, we are not allowed to deal with the” individual”. “All are equal”, therefore schools, universities, corporations are judged by the number [percentages] with dark skin or particular sexual identities, or else we are X-ist. If the percentage passed, promoted, disciplined, etc does not match the proportion of that favored Identity, then it is a “Federal Case”, or at least was. The “individual” no longer means anything.
Is that why Germany is still occupied 73 years after it lost the war?
Do you idiots need to drag “incel” into everything?
Perhaps, they are right. Perhaps, just perhaps, there is something magical about us Whites. Arabs and Negroes are envious of us, because, we look so much better than they do!