The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Karl Haemers Archive
U.S. Neo-Communist-Prop
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
List of Bookmarks

“Political correctness is communist propaganda writ small. In my study of communist societies, I came to the conclusion that the purpose of communist propaganda was not to persuade or convince, not to inform, but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponded to reality the better. When people are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves, they lose once and for all their sense of probity. To assent to obvious lies is in some small way to become evil oneself. One’s standing to resist anything is thus eroded, and even destroyed. A society of emasculated liars is easy to control. I think if you examine political correctness, it has the same effect and is intended to.”
-Interview with Theodore Dalrymple by Jamie Glazov, FrontPageMagazine.com, August 31, 2005

Ever since I saw this quote a few years ago, soon after the covid phenomenon began in 2020, it has haunted my perception of the Government/Media/Academia (GMA) Complex (if there exists a Military/Industrial Complex, there exists others, and GMA is one. They all join together in one Meta-Complex we might call the New World Order or Great Reset). This quote is troubling to consider, because it reveals that we in the U.S. live under a Communist GMA mind tyranny. Too few people understand this, believing Communist influence faded in the U.S. after WWII and especially after the “McCarthy Era” ending in the mid-50s.

No. Communism of course only expanded its influence and power after the National Socialists and Fascists lost to Communism in WWII (European Civil War 8B). The U.S. and Britain fought on the Communist side, having been infiltrated by Communists, many of them Jews. Communism expanded further after one of the only checks and limits on Communism in the U.S., Senator Joseph McCarthy through the Senate Sub-Committee on Permanent Investigations (not the House Un-American Activities Committee), was defamed and deposed.

This has led directly to our Neo-Communist domination today, and Dalrymple’s quote reveals it. It is a tremendous struggle for many Americans today to consider that we suffer under a Communist propaganda onslaught. So perhaps it helps to label it Neo-Communism, since it has morphed beyond class warfare into many other divisions, and has incorporated new oppressive technologies (both should be essays of their own). I have studied Communist strategies and influences in a number of books, such as Behind Communism by Frank L. Britton and The Naked Communist by W. Cleon Skousen. Many other sources can be cited addressing Communist propaganda as a culture weapon, but here we will examine Dalyrmple’s for its insights.

First we must examine Dalyrmple. He is half-Jewish through his mother, and his father was a “Communist businessman.” That is a significant tautology! His real name is Anthony Malcolm Daniels. Beware of Jews with Communist businessman fathers who change their names. Daniels/Dalrymple was a prison doctor and psychiatrist, and became a “conservative English cultural critic,” of all things. He is the author of at least 20 books between 2001 and 2015, and is the Dietrich Weismann Fellow at the Manhattan Institute.” (At least two of three “recent content” articles featured at the Manhattan Institute appear to be authored by Jews: Shapiro, and Goldberg & Kaufmann. In an apparent synchronicity, as I wrote this Professor MacDonald posted “Twitter feed from E.P. Kaufmann showing the effectiveness of propaganda on children,” on the very same day, referencing the same essay I saw on the Manhattan Institute site.)

Dietrich Weismann was a “Chairman for the Board of Trustees in the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research,” deceased 2015. Mission statement: “The Manhattan Institute is a think tank whose mission is to develop and disseminate new ideas that foster greater economic choice and individual responsibility.” The Board of Trustees is loaded with high-power Jews, such as Chairman Paul Singer (billionaire vulture fund manager, LGBT philanthropist, etc.), Maurice Greenberg (former executive at bankrupt AIG, friend of Henry Kissinger, former vice chairman of Council on Foreign Relations, member of Rockefeller Trilateral Commission, critic of Iranian President Ahmadinejad’s “holocaust denial,” etc.), Robert Rosenkranz (Chairman Delphi Capital Management, member CFR, etc.), and many other high-power Jews.

Dalrymple’s quote appears to warn us about the dangers of Communist propaganda, but we must consider that it may be part of the strategy of managing both sides of the mainstream political spectrum (like the rest of mainstream conservatives (including all the talking heads at FoxNews) the Manhattan Institute would never stand up for White interests or deal with the role of Jews in our dispossession); or it may be an example of the indoctrination/familiarization influence, what Michael Hoffman calls The Revelation of the Method (pp. 35–6). The latter is a dangerous stage of Communist propaganda where the techniques used against us are shown to us, when we have little power to resist. It instills deeper demoralization and subservience to Communist rule for us to know yet remain impotent. It shows their almost total confidence in their power over us. Orwell’s 1984 should be considered not a cautionary tale or a warning of a near-future Communist dystopia, but perhaps a Revelation of the Method, indoctrinating us to being more likely to passively accept having read Orwell. He was after all embedded in a Trotskyite unit fighting on the Communist side of the Spanish Civil War.

Dalrymple may be the same. He says, “the purpose of Communist propaganda was … to humiliate. … The less it corresponded to reality, the better.” We have many examples to consider today, such as Critical Race Theory demonizing Whites in a campaign of “anti-racism,” “diversity is our strength” as migrant violent crime decimates the White population, gender reassignment surgery for children declared “gender affirming care,” and closing schools, bankrupting businesses, denying right to assemble, and mass injection (often under extreme pressure of loss of employment) of an under-tested experimental high-tech substance that does not meet the legal or medical definition of traditional vaccines will rescue public health and help us “build back better.” Dalrymple’s quote explains a great deal in our society that would be otherwise not just baffling, but maddening.

Jews play an overwhelming role in afflicting this humiliating propaganda upon the U.S. population, just as Jews played an overwhelming role in Communism historically. And they use their very prominent position in the GMA Complex power to impose brutal punishment through public defamation, demonetization, ostracism, prison and even death on any who speak out against these obvious lies.

Disbelievers “are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves.” Drastic psychological damage is inflicted when people know something is false, but are inhibited by fear from saying so, or even pressured into mouthing the lies themselves, and even believing them; “they lose once and for all their sense of probity.” The lies are advertised as nothing but aspirations to the highest ideals—integrity and honesty to self and others. This is deeply demoralizing. The goal of neo-communist propaganda is suppression of dissent against it, and forced compliance with it. “To assent to obvious lies is in some small way to become evil oneself.” Neo-Communist Jews in the U.S. today impose their own evil—Jews and Their Lies—upon the goyim, in a process of projection-conversion. When we merely assent to silence, we participate in the evil. We are Judaized.

They say in their own causes: “Silence is violence,” and “See something, say something.” Those who break that silence and say something are rewarded. Yet they make saying something against their propaganda dreadfully costly and even painful. This is why free speech is now very expensive.

Daniels/Dalrymple summarizes: “A society of emasculated liars is easy to control.” Presumably he means “emasculated” as a lack of courage to speak truth to power. We become liars even to ourselves by failing to assert our own truths in the face of such obvious lies. In the Communist societies Dalyrmple and I have studied, everyone knew the official state propaganda was lies. Astonishingly, a significant percentage of people on both sides of the politically bi-partisan lies actually believes them, no matter how deliberately and intentionally it failed to correspond to reality. “Obvious lies,” are adopted as true by many Americans. And passionately. Interpreting Dalrymple, our neo-communist overlords would prefer we know it is all lies, and so they present their blatant absurdities in escalating extremism—but still gullible Americans believe. Ignorance is bliss, and perhaps they paradoxically escape the worst damage suffered among those who see the lies but dare not refute them.

It has been said by Solzhenitsyn that Americans are weak because we have not suffered under Communist domination, to gain perspective and make us strong. We are suffering now under Neo-Communist propaganda evil, and while many succumb to it—they can fool some of the people all of the time, and some of the people part of the time, but they can’t fool all of the people all the time. But the disbelievers are far too often the ones forced to toe the lies and demoralize themselves, to renounce their probity.

Many have already defied this and spoken truth about power and to power. That is why we speak Taboo Truth. That is why the Occidental Observer presents the great body of knowledge it commands. Many other outlets of lie-busting and truth telling are here and growing. We retain our probity and undermine evil in the culture war for the Good Society founded on Truth. Truth leads to the Good Society. Neo-Communist lies now forced upon the U.S. population lead to ruin, chaos, enslavement and death, a tyranny of Neo-Communist overlords upon the “society of emasculated liars.”

Truth is our weapon in this culture war. Probity is our shield. They are trying to disarm us. Hold fast to the weapon of Truth and defend with the shield of probity. Daniels/Dalrymple as the son of a Jewess and a “Communist businessman” and a Fellow at the the very Jewish Manhattan Institute may be showing us his strategy to deepen our demoralization. This should backfire. The more who know, the more we grow. Popular blowback is a growing tide that no Neo-Commie lies can stop. Power will always rise strong among a people of re-masculated truth-tellers.

(Republished from The Occidental Observer by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 10 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Folkvangr says:

    Disbelievers “are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves.”

    There are two words for such “unbelievers”: cowards and traitors. Stop playing word games, it’s too damn late for that.

  2. Kali says:

    Clarity serves to empower us to continue in Truth.

    Very interesting essay. Thank you.

    Best regards,
    Kali.

  3. JR Foley says:

    Stand up Joe Biden and face facts. Ursula Von der Leyen is now in Canada and she thinks she is going to replace the big kipper gobbler Jens Stoltenberg as Boss Man at NATO.

    Amtrak Joe –you backstabbing jerk —this prize was to be handed to Canadian Chrystia Freeland —her grandaddy was the newspaper man for Bandera and helped Zylenskyy’s by turning in their congregation for a Nazi citation.

    Or perhaps –this job can be shared between Ursula and Chrystia –Tryst in Brussels –Never on a Sunday —3/3 and pass the 7UP !!!

  4. Is it possible that we’re seeing the millennial black magic techniques fostered by Rabbinical tradition finally turned back on themselves, as Israel inches towards open civil war?

    With Netanyahu’s adroit internal application of the Tribe’s classic divide, perplex, demoralize and subdue method long applied- with incredible historical patience- to the ancient perceived enemies of the Rabbis (which is to say, 99.995% of the human race) via the creation of “post-modernism” rejecting all non-Talmudic tradition- now in a no-holds-barred targeting of internal Israeli political factions, appearing to be triggering the descent of that “US lifeboat in the Middle East” into a black hole of internecine self-destruction. Is the trigger of this self-destruction the Israeli high court’s rejection of the exemption of Israeli rabbinical students from military service?

    Thank you Ron Unz for the platform from which we keep watch.

    https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/why-benjamin-netanyahu-has-outlasted-all-his-political-rivals/

  5. It’s a pity that this article, one of Mr. Haemers’s best, received so little in the way of comment here at the Unz Review. As it happens, the article prompted a good deal more interest at TOO, but much of what was written there, sadly, consisted of either irrelevant ramblings from roboposters or hasbara-type comments warning readers against hurting the Jews’ feelings. Many comments of the latter type came from a single individual, a man who is notorious for using several screen names within a single article’s thread. He often blatantly praises his own comments published under another pseudonym!

    I look forward to reading more from Mr. Haemers. Besides being thoughtful and energetic in expression, he has an excellent grasp of history—something that many authors and commenters lack.

    • Replies: @Karl Haemers
  6. @Pierre de Craon

    Thank you. I was honored to see Anne Coulter commented at TOO, saying this essay deserved to be in the hall of fame.
    What are the screen names of this single individual? I want to be forewarned.

  7. Is Ann Coulter the commenter who calls herself “Anne C”? I never connected the two, but I was struck by your gracious reply to her comment.

    The multiple-personality individual I referred to first came on board TOO six or seven years ago as a sort of comical commenting sidekick—or more bluntly, a sycophant—of a full-of-himself Brit called David Ashton. The oldest screen name I recall for the sidekick is Casper (with a forgotten last name). Shortly afterwards, he began using the name Ned (again, can’t recall the surname). I always address him as Ned whenever I wish him to know that I see through his thick veil of bullshit. I’ve never failed to get a bitter rejoinder from him.

    The comments of Ashton and Casper/Ned have been notable for three characteristics: they always find good things to say about Jews, bad things to say about anti-Jewish hard-line commenters, especially the articulate ones, and pretentious things to say about everything else. I’ve called Ned out frequently for his dishonesty, but 80 percent of the time, KM or his moderators have declined to publish my comments that do so. (They allowed a lengthy last-minute comment to that effect in the TOO avatar of this article. Perhaps you saw it.)

    In addition and with particular regard to me, both of them have long been irrationally vexed because they cannot identify the source of the screen name I use!* The plain dishonesty inherent in the fact that both of them have used multiple pseudonymous screen names over the years has never troubled them when they sneer at me for using the one and only screen name in my arsenal.

    Rather than ramble on, I’ll conclude with my far-from-complete list of Ned’s identities. As my dear old commenting friend Trenchant once said, he can’t help revealing himself.

    Certainties: Aiden Lake, B. Rockford, jank, Nicola Spart
    Highly Possibles / Very Probables: JM, Terry Bull, Ted Butler, Lady Strange, Lord Snooty, What’s up Skip
    A brief selection of one-shot names: Martin’s Benz, @quasi-verbatim, another halfwit, Archibald Bunker, and many, many others

    I look forward to reading more of your essays.
    ___________
    *I frequently laughed at them both for picking up everything they claim to know from Wikipedia and angered them further by telling them truthfully that there is at least one other Pierre de Craon of whom the Wikipedians, all of them Jews of course, are totally unaware because they, like Ned and Ashton, aren’t as widely read as they pretend to be.

    • Replies: @Karl Haemers
  8. @Pierre de Craon

    thank you Pierre for answering my question. I am not sure why I asked it now, since I am not likely to monitor all these front names in any comment thread. I’m impressed that you figured them all out. I see Eric Striker, whose writing I admire, appears to have given up and is going by his real name, Joseph Jordan (at least, I think it’s his real name). Does Andrew Anglin? Jim Goad encourages everyone to use their real names, else be hypocrites and traitors. I’ve faced direct Antifa confrontations, and while it can be exhilirating, it is something to be strategically arranged, not spontaneously defended.
    I will now watch for this in comment threads. It is predicted 90% of comments into the future will be from bots. Maybe everything about comment threads should be doubted. Most important is the source article, but comments always interest me too, to gauge how people respond and what further knowledge they have to share. I’ve often been impressed, as I am with your comments. Sometimes it inspires me to another essay.

    • Replies: @Pierre de Craon
  9. @Karl Haemers

    Maybe everything about comment threads should be doubted. Most important is the source article …

    I completely agree!

  10. Mr. Haemers,

    Thank you very much for a very informative article. I used to be somewhat of a worshipper of Franklin D. Roosevelt. But I kept seeing very unflattering comments about him in Unz. I just finished reading a book that was written by Emanuel Josephson – “The Strange Death of Franklin D. Roosevelt” – a real expose of the Delano / Roosevelt clan and their very dirty family laundry. Like the saying goes – “Behind every fortune lies a crime.”

    I am not quite 72 years old and only in the past decade have I begun to find out the REAL history of my country, the United States, and of that of the rest of the world. Maybe I am too cynical, but I firmly believe that practically everything which goes on in the USA and around the world is the result of a scam, a conspiracy or a combination of the two. In other words, nothing is as it seems. NOTHING.

    As far as “Nazis,” “Communists,” “Socialists” or “Fascists” are concerned, I believe that all of those “labels” describe the same group or groups of people – people intent on establishing a One World Fascist government with the Elite at the top and everyone else being their slaves. Just my opinion.

    Thank you.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Karl Haemers Comments via RSS