RSS
Introduction
Transgenderism can be seen as a politically correct ideology along with feminism, anti-racism and the others. The main things it has in common with them are a hatred and denial of nature and an impertinent urge to overcome it.
Feminism against nature
Feminists’ hatred and denial of nature are seen in their refusal to accept that the sexes are simply different. On the contrary, they say, they are essentially the same. Anything a man can do, a woman can, and so on. They back this up not by pointing to facts but with a taboo against saying the opposite. Like the exponents of every politically correct ideology, they have a special attack word for dissenters. In fact, they have two. Should you have the temerity to ignore the taboo, you will be called a sexist or a misogynist.
For some reason these techniques persuade many that what feminists say is true. Equally importantly, they silence those who are not persuaded, leaving feminists a clear field.
With no dissent to be heard, feminists proceed to ask why the sexes are in different circumstances. Why are women rarely found in leadership positions, they wonder, when the idea that men are more likely to compete for such positions and more suited to them is just a myth? Men must be keeping women down.
Feminists reason that to undo this injustice society must be reshaped to look as it would have done had they been correct, with women in half of all leadership positions. If the principle of equal treatment must be disregarded to achieve this, so be it. Thus, having denied nature, they seek to overcome it, or to give the appearance of having overcome it, at no matter what cost to society.
But then, having filled half the leadership positions in a certain field with women, they ask themselves why they should stop there. Why leave the other half to the oppressor? So they carry on, resulting in a fact such as that in 2018 almost every top position concerning the British police was occupied by a woman. This included London’s senior officer (Cressida Dick), the Director General of the National Crime Agency (Lynne Owens), the head of the National Police Chiefs’ Council (Sarah Thornton), the chair of the College of Policing (Shirley Pearce), the president of the Police Superintendents Association (Irene Curtis) and the chair of the Independent Police Complaints Commission (Anne Owers).[1]The Director of Public Prosecutions was also a woman: Alison Saunders, who was found to have been suppressing evidence of men’s innocence in rape cases.
About the only exceptions were the chief constables outside London, of whom by 2020 still only two out of 46 were female. Yet just eighteen months later there were fifteen female chief constables.[2]History Debunked, July 8th 2021, “Women in command; female leaders in the police and army”, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1i6pBj6dYMw. Including Wales, after another six months there were 19 out 49 (Telegraph, Jan. 9th 2023, “Record 40 per cent of chief constables are now women amid anti-misogyny drive”, https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/01/09/record-4...ogyny/ ). It is surprising even that as many as thirteen chief constables retired in so short a period. For them all to have been succeeded by women was proof indeed that women can not only do anything men can do but are likely to be able to do it considerably better. Or perhaps it just proved that if no man is on the shortlist, a woman will get the job.
Anti-racism against nature
Anti-racism proceeds just like feminism except that this time it is the races that are supposedly the same. The doctrine of essential racial equality might not appear to be true, but we must assent to it for it too is protected by a taboo. Point to a difference between the races, however evident, and anti-racism’s attack word will be attached to you: you will be called a racist. Again, with any dissent from its basic proposition stifled, we are asked to explain the fact that the races are in different circumstances, the only available explanation being that Whites have been oppressing Blacks. And again, the solution is not the removal of the discrimination but its reversal. Blacks must be favoured over Whites.
Thus feminism and anti-racism use the same playbook. They both employ the idea of essential equality to deny nature before seeking to reshape it to fit their Procrustean bed. Is it too tall? Chop its feet off! Too short? Put it on the rack!
Transgenderism against nature
That transgenderism hates nature and refuses to submit to it is obvious. It finds the most basic fact of life — that nature makes us male or female — too much to bear. What if I didn’t want to be male? Did nature think of that? It is time it learned that if I choose to become a woman I will jolly well do it.
How? Well, first I am going to adopt a philosophy that tells me that whatever I say is true: the philosophy of word magic. I will call myself a woman, which will make me one. Just in case, I will then embark on a lifelong course of cross-sex hormones and undergo innumerable surgical procedures that will make me resemble a woman or at least make me look a lot more like one than I do now.
What is more, I will get my medical insurance to pay for all this on the basis that my dissatisfaction with my sex is a psychiatric condition. At the same time, I will insist that I have no psychiatric condition but am simply an example of normal human variation. Then everyone will see that I am as much a woman as any woman and that there is nothing wrong with me. It was nature that got it wrong. As I might put it: “I was born with the wrong genitals. … I had a birth defect that I got sorted with surgery and medication”.[3]This was a man calling himself Bethany Black in conversation with Helen Lewis (New Statesman, Sept. 13th 2013, “What makes you a man or a woman anyway?” https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/feminism/2013/...anyway ). How incompetent of nature to give me that birth defect! How wrong nature was if it didn’t think I could get it sorted with surgery and medication! It must be feeling pretty silly now.
Punishments for thinkers
No politically correct ideology can tolerate considered thought, as we see in the case of transgenderism in some events from the last few years. In 2019 the contract of a woman named Maya Forstater was not renewed after she tweeted that “transgender women” were men.[4]Maya Forstater made her comments, not while at work, during a discussion of possible reforms to the Gender Recognition Act. When she contested what was in effect her sacking, the judge ruled against her, finding that her opinion was not compatible with human dignity.[5]Her appeal, heard in 2021, found that her position was “worthy of respect in a democratic society”.
In the midst of this, J.K. Rowling spoke up for her, saying that biological sex existed. For this she received a “barrage of criticism”, yet she refused to apologise, said the news outlet RT in wonderment.[6]RT. Jun 7th 2020. “‘There used to be a word for people who menstruate’: JK Rowling gets denounced as transphobe AGAIN”. https://www.rt.com/news/491077-rowling-trans-women-row/ . Six months later she mocked an NGO for using the phrase “people who menstruate”, asking whether there had not once been a single word for such people, which she seemed to remember had begun with “w”. This brought another “avalanche” of denunciation down on her, with someone tweeting that her words were “causing unimaginable pain”. Well, of course they were! How can a transgender person be expected to encounter a cryptic reference to the word “woman” without suffering unimaginable pain? Another commenter called J.K. Rowling a hate-filled weirdo.
In October 2021 Cambridge University’s Students Union issued a guide to spotting “Terfs”, these being feminists who think that there are two sexes and that one cannot switch from one to the other.[7]Telegraph, Oct. 13th 2021, “Cambridge University ‘Terf-spotting’ guide condemned as a ‘witch-finder’s charter’”, reproduced at https://ovarit.com/o/GenderCritical/45570/cambridge-...harter . Predictably, the guide indulged in projection, referring to “Terf ideology” as though it were the views of Terfs that were ideological rather than its own. It stated that Terfs had a “deep hatred for trans women”, when it was the guide that was spreading hatred, of Terfs. It alleged that Terfs had links to the far right, when there is nothing political about their position, in contrast to the far-left position of the guide.[8]MailOnline, “Cambridge Students’ Union publishes pro-trans guide claiming that being a woman is not just down to ‘biological sex’ — and accuses feminists opposing such views as being linked to ‘far right’”, https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10087849/Ca...x.html .
The same week, activists at Sussex University launched a campaign to get a philosophy professor fired. Kathleen Stock had asked whether a person’s gender identity could have more social significance than their sex and had doubted whether men should be allowed in women’s changing rooms. Students put up posters saying “IT’S NOT A DEBATE. IT’S NOT FEMINISM. … IT’S JUST TRANSPHOBIA … FIRE KATHLEEN STOCK.” She received death threats and was advised not to go on campus without bodyguards. Her union offered her no support but expressed “solidarity” with “trans and nonbinary communities”. Two weeks later she resigned.
What was noticeable about her defenders was their feebleness. The commentator Paul Embery said that she had merely defended the principle of biological sex and women’s right to single-sex spaces. Women’s concerns about having men in their changing rooms were perfectly legitimate. Transgender activists were trying to get everyone to take their view, he said. But biological sex is not a principle to which one might adhere or not; it is a basic fact of life, and women’s right to women-only changing rooms should be beyond dispute. Instead of saying that transgender activists were trying to get others to take their view, as though it were a view that could deserve respect, Paul Embery should have said that they were trying to get people to affirm a lie.[9]GB News, Oct. 17th 2021, “Kathleen Stock: Paul Embery says abuse of academic after alleged ‘transphobic’ remark is ‘appalling’”, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WY4b1atncaY. A philosopher named Arif Ahmed stated that Kathleen Stock’s persecution was making it impossible for “one side of a very important public policy debate” to speak. Apparently we had reached the point where the efforts of men to get into women’s changing rooms counted as a contribution to an important debate.
Transgender language rules
No PC ideology can leave the language alone, for unless interfered with, it has a way of reflecting reality. A previous article gave some examples of linguistic engineering aimed at abolishing sex–related words and the associated concepts with them. To give a few more examples, in 2023 Oxfam published an Inclusive Language Guide that illustrated its “commitment to gender justice”, defined as “full equality between women and men (including trans men and women) as well as non-binary people”.[10]For an overview of the guide, see Oxfam, March 2023, “Inclusive Language Guide”, https://policy-practice.oxfam.org/resources/inclusiv...21487/ . For the guide itself see https://oxfamilibrary.openrepository.com/bitstream/h...ence=4 .
According to the guide, we must not speak of husbands or wives but must call them partners or spouses, nor must we use the words “mother” or “father”, which would assume “the adoption of gendered roles by transgender parents”. We must be aware that patriarchal systems perpetuate sexist and hierarchical power relations and legitimise “discrimination against and exclusion of women and gender non-conforming people”. Moreover, we must be aware that the word “people” itself, although it might not seem to specify a sex, can still express a bias because “in the context of a world based on patriarchal systems, ‘people’ is often misunderstood as only referring to men”. If we must talk about “people”, therefore, we should do it in a way that makes the word “as inclusive as possible”.
When it comes to personal pronouns, the guide tells us not to assume that it is correct to “describe someone as ‘he’ or ‘she’ based on their name or physical appearance”. The person might prefer to be called “they” or “ze”.
Like the British Medical Association (referred to in the previous article), Oxfam advises against using the term “expectant mother”. Not only does the expression “reinforce gender stereotypes”; the woman might not wish to continue her pregnancy. It does allow that pregnant people are women, however, although if we stress this fact we might be excluding “gender non-binary, trans men, or gender non-conforming people”.
The words “transgendered” and “transsexual” must be avoided in case someone referred to in this way doesn’t like it. “In a society that upholds the human rights to equality, freedom of expression, privacy and self-determination, we must respect how people wish to be referred to.” We must take an approach that “actively includes transgender people”. Ideally, “a trans-inclusive approach will identify the ways that trans people are specifically impacted by discrimination”. Presumably, then, rather than calling transgender people transgender, we should call them victims of discrimination in various ways that we will proceed to specify, who might be mistakenly referred to as transgender by the unenlightened.
Transgenderism against science
From the postmodern philosophy that gives it its belief in word magic, transgenderism also gets its belief in the priority of subjectivity over objectivity. But since it exists in a society that values science, it must do as other politically correct ideologies do and pretend that its dogmas are scientific, as when claiming that the evidence “strongly suggests” that gender identity is “usually established … by the age of two to three”;[11]Ryan T. Anderson, 2019 (2018), When Harry Became Sally, New York: Encounter Books. 2019, ibid., pp. 32-33.
(For an overview of the guide, see Oxfam, March 2023, “Inclusive Language Guide”, https://policy-practice.oxfam.org/resources/inclusiv...21487/ . For the guide itself see https://oxfamilibrary.openrepository.com/bitstream/h...ence=4 .) that “the expression of transgender identity … is a healthy, appropriate and typical aspect of human development”;[12]Ryan Anderson 2019, ibid., p. 38.
(For an overview of the guide, see Oxfam, March 2023, “Inclusive Language Guide”, https://policy-practice.oxfam.org/resources/inclusiv...21487/ . For the guide itself see https://oxfamilibrary.openrepository.com/bitstream/h...ence=4 .) or that “From a medical perspective, the appropriate determinant of sex is gender identity”. The last comment was made by a professor at Duke University School of Medicine, who meant that the best way for a doctor to establish a person’s sex is by asking them. “It is counter to medical science”, she continued, “to use chromosomes, hormones, internal reproductive organs, external genitalia, or secondary sex characteristics to override gender identity for purposes of classifying someone as male or female”.[13]Ryan Anderson 2019, ibid., p. 30.
(For an overview of the guide, see Oxfam, March 2023, “Inclusive Language Guide”, https://policy-practice.oxfam.org/resources/inclusiv...21487/ . For the guide itself see https://oxfamilibrary.openrepository.com/bitstream/h...ence=4 .)
Of course, deception itself is characteristic of political correctness, on which subject it might be worth pointing out that a politically correct statement is necessarily untrue. This is because true statements, meaning empirically correct ones, can look after themselves. Only statements that are empirically incorrect need to be made correct politically.
Transgenderism and childism
A little-mentioned ideology of political correctness is childism, which transgenderism does not so much resemble as incorporate. Childism inverts the natural order by transferring the authority of adults to children, as seen one day in 1998 when BBC Radio 4’s Woman’s Hour looked at the question of what to do with the children in the summer holidays. It didn’t ask parents for their ideas but asked a panel of children. Already in the 1970s Kahlil Gibran’s book The Prophet (1923) was popular, mainly for its advice to parents: “You may strive to be like [your children], but seek not to make them like you”. This gave rise to the idea that adults have more to learn from children than children have to learn from adults.
The children’s author Cressida Cowell expressed her childism when she wrote in 2020 that children “are the most creative people in the world”, raising the question of why Pope Julius II commissioned Michelangelo to paint the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel when he could have got a better result by commissioning a child. Cressida Cowell hoped that children’s “magical powers of creativity, intelligence and empathy” would make them “come up with solutions to the political and scientific challenges facing the world” — not as adults, mark you, when they would have lost their magical powers, but now, as children.
But childism had reached its apogee the year before, when an assembly of world leaders asked a child to tell them what to do. This was at the United Nations Climate Action Summit in New York, which Greta Thunberg, aged sixteen, was invited to address. Rising to her role as leader of leaders, the pigtailed adolescent expressed her advice by asking her audience how they dared to do this or that.
The natural complement of treating children like adults is to treat adults like children. This is the essence of “dumbing down”, which first appeared in the 1990s. Many adults responded by starting not only to talk and think like children but also to dress like them, going about in track suits that resembled romper suits. The infantilisation of adults has continued ever since.
Transgenderism incorporates childism by telling teachers not to talk to transgender children but to listen to them, and not to lead them but to follow. Thus in 2014, East Sussex County Council Children’s Services issued the following guidance to teachers: “Listen to the [transgender] child … and wherever possible follow their lead and preferences”.[14]East Sussex County Council Children’s Services, Oct. 2014, “Trans* Inclusion Schools Toolkit”, https://czone.eastsussex.gov.uk/media/2480/trans-too...it.pdf (file no longer there). Similarly, an American campaigning organisation says that “the most important thing we can do is listen to what our [transgender] children are telling us”.[15]PFLAG, quoted by Ryan Anderson 2019, op. cit., p. 35. Adults should learn from children, thinks Diane Ehrensaft, director of mental health at the Child and Adolescent Gender Center at Benioff Children’s Hospital at the University of California, San Francisco. Children are “our best teachers”.[16]Quoted by Ryan Anderson 2019, ibid., pp 35-36.
(PFLAG, quoted by Ryan Anderson 2019, op. cit., p. 35.) The logical conclusion of this will see groups of grown-ups filing into the classroom to be instructed by infants wearing mortarboards.
Transgenderism requires doctors to accept not only a transgender child’s self-diagnosis but also its prescribed course of treatment. Medical professionals do as they are told for fear of their patients declaring themselves unsatisfied with the service they have received or accusing them of “transphobia”.[17]The Heritage Foundation, March 28th 2019, “The Medical Harms of Hormonal and Surgical Interventions for Gender Dysphoric Children”, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bnP_WoeNuwA.
Conclusion
If one views political correctness as a collection of ideologies, then transgenderism is just one of these. All tend to the destruction of our societies and culture; most pit themselves against nature. This suggests that their originators are conducting a war against God, for to say that something is as it is by nature is only to say that that is the way God made it. The rebels’ chosen battlefield is the West, where political correctness is mainly found. White people are their particular enemies on earth. If they can defeat us here, they will take themselves to have defeated God. At least, that is one way of looking at the situation.
Notes
[1] The Director of Public Prosecutions was also a woman: Alison Saunders, who was found to have been suppressing evidence of men’s innocence in rape cases.
[2] History Debunked, July 8th 2021, “Women in command; female leaders in the police and army”, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1i6pBj6dYMw. Including Wales, after another six months there were 19 out 49 (Telegraph, Jan. 9th 2023, “Record 40 per cent of chief constables are now women amid anti-misogyny drive”, https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/01/09/record-40-per-cent-chief-constables-now-women-amid-anti-misogyny/ ).
[3] This was a man calling himself Bethany Black in conversation with Helen Lewis (New Statesman, Sept. 13th 2013, “What makes you a man or a woman anyway?” https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/feminism/2013/09/battle-over-gender-what-makes-you-man-or-woman-anyway ).
[4] Maya Forstater made her comments, not while at work, during a discussion of possible reforms to the Gender Recognition Act.
[5] Her appeal, heard in 2021, found that her position was “worthy of respect in a democratic society”.
[6] RT. Jun 7th 2020. “‘There used to be a word for people who menstruate’: JK Rowling gets denounced as transphobe AGAIN”. https://www.rt.com/news/491077-rowling-trans-women-row/ .
[7] Telegraph, Oct. 13th 2021, “Cambridge University ‘Terf-spotting’ guide condemned as a ‘witch-finder’s charter’”, reproduced at https://ovarit.com/o/GenderCritical/45570/cambridge-university-terf-spotting-guide-condemned-as-a-witch-finders-charter .
[8] MailOnline, “Cambridge Students’ Union publishes pro-trans guide claiming that being a woman is not just down to ‘biological sex’ — and accuses feminists opposing such views as being linked to ‘far right’”, https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10087849/Cambridge-SU-publishes-pro-trans-guide-claiming-woman-not-just-biological-sex.html .
[9] GB News, Oct. 17th 2021, “Kathleen Stock: Paul Embery says abuse of academic after alleged ‘transphobic’ remark is ‘appalling’”, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WY4b1atncaY.
[10] For an overview of the guide, see Oxfam, March 2023, “Inclusive Language Guide”, https://policy-practice.oxfam.org/resources/inclusive-language-guide-621487/ . For the guide itself see https://oxfamilibrary.openrepository.com/bitstream/handle/10546/621487/tk-inclusive-language-guide-130323-en.pdf?sequence=4 .
[11] Ryan T. Anderson, 2019 (2018), When Harry Became Sally, New York: Encounter Books. 2019, ibid., pp. 32-33.
[12] Ryan Anderson 2019, ibid., p. 38.
[13] Ryan Anderson 2019, ibid., p. 30.
[14] East Sussex County Council Children’s Services, Oct. 2014, “Trans* Inclusion Schools Toolkit”, https://czone.eastsussex.gov.uk/media/2480/trans-toolkit.pdf (file no longer there).
[15] PFLAG, quoted by Ryan Anderson 2019, op. cit., p. 35.
[16] Quoted by Ryan Anderson 2019, ibid., pp 35-36.
[17] The Heritage Foundation, March 28th 2019, “The Medical Harms of Hormonal and Surgical Interventions for Gender Dysphoric Children”, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bnP_WoeNuwA.
English
Arabic
Chinese (Simplified)
Dutch
French
German
Hebrew
Hindi
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Russian
Spanish
Swedish
Turkish
Vietnamese
I agree with the basic message, but I would call it “Leftist” instead of “PC”.
onAfter the Annual Costume Party at the Community Center, the Talk of the Town Trailer Estates Park Sociology Round Table expressed the following:
Granny Yiddell (bitter retiree) – My husband of 41 years, Solomon, left me for a Filipina he met over the internet and gave all our money to IT. I just recently found out that IT was born a man. Thank Goodness that Solly died when visiting his “family” over there. Food poisoning from pork.
Mother (righteous mother) – My son is 100% man. Sure he’s a shut-in but he’s no homo.
Father O’Hair (wannabe priest) – My rigid piety doesn’t accept fake ladies. The real thing only and I don’t mean Coke.
Jabber (shy shut-in) – Who would want to be a woman? They’re never happy – look at Mother.
Bozero (Latino clown) – I can twist a balloon to be a man or woman. Why can’t these weirdos just enjoy latex? A lot cheaper and it doesn’t require a doctor. I don’t trust doctors – freaks that became doctors so they could see people without clothes and pretend it’s professional.
Fiona (park fun lady) – Why would a woman want a p#$&s? You can stay a real woman and provide fun to female friends with a simple massager. You know the pointy sort advertised in ladies magazines with the model using it on her back pain only. BTW, Mother has been complaining of lower, lower back pain recently.
These people are beyond parody–almost: looks like someone tried.
https://counter-currents.com/2023/05/info-parody-a-strategy-for-reaching-normies-part-3/
In reality, the anti-biblical idea of glorifying homosexuality arose as a political necessity in the West because if more could not be spent on social benefits, at least if something could be granted that would not affect profits; And so it was decided that everyone could do whatever they wanted with his body, giving free rein to the homosexual reign.
It was said that homosexual marriages would be more solvent for having two salaries and not the burden of children; and by simple logic, if people have more, they live better and if they do what they like best, then they would be satisfied with their destiny and social problems would disappear.
This is how the matter was handled in the media two decades ago. That is why the spread of homosexuality became a prioritized Western political task.
There is plenty of “political correctness” in Asia, just applied to different issues. That’s where the term came from, isn’t it? (You might say Lenin started it, but look at those eyelids.)
What we’re seeing is a hybrid of Maoism and Gramsci.
A feminist like j.k.rowling insisting “biological sexes exist” is one of the most ironic joke of all time. feminism is a form of transgenderism, and now you object it because it undermines your privileges? LOL, I’m all for trannies against the so-called ‘terfs’. Let the trannies just genocide the ‘terfs’. 以夷制夷.
It’s significant that TERFS are called “radical” in that they opposite the notion that men can be women. What’s radical about that? Yet they seem happy enough with the term.
They haven’t silenced the Babylon Bee. Will YouTube ban them again?
Video Link
We’re living in Weimar II, yet the author seems to think this is something new. There is a long history, starting with Freud, the Frankfurt school, etc ….
It was one of the first things Hitler attended to ….
I think it’s hilarious how feminists like J.K Rowling fear, loathe, and fight against transgenders. Feminists wanted “equality,” and now they’re getting it, good and hard. I have no sympathy for feminists being abused by mentally ill trannies; they brought this on themselves.
Feminism and trannies are not sustainable. These ideologies are destroying our civilization. The only solution is returning to the natural order of the patriarchy. It will happen, sooner than most people think.
The worst thing is, to use the terminology of E. Michael Jones, the “Gay Disco”, is now what they will expect you to die for. They want to spread the “Gay Disco” to the entire world. In the upcoming WWIII will they be waving that grotesque new gay flag around? NATO, is just waiting for their nails to dry.
The woke are too fucked up to live. They will learn to deal with reality or die off in the coming depression.
the central point of PC is simple and must be underlined:
there no natural order to which all human beings must submit,
instead the political power creates a new world order according to the wishes of powerful elites that control the money supply around the world
PC and woke are soft terms. All of this stuff is Neo-Marxism. It flows from the Frankfurt School and more specifically in the United States, Herbert Marcuse. Yes, they were all communist Jews as you would expect. The final goal is communism which America is well on the way to. They and their ideology are pure evil. You want to remove it from our culture? Good luck because it will take a Hitler type effort to do so at this point.
I’m not sure I would go so far as to call it an ‘ideology’ — but believing in the concept of malleable gender, as opposed to fixed biological sex, and that a person can change gender, is today definitely being used as a kind of Gesinnungstest.
If all the nigras were adopting this whole gay/tranny thing, it would be beautiful. A couple generations and they would disappear. The whites adopting it are either mentally ill or just trendy feather brains, and our gene pool is better without them.
Trannies themselves are all about exhibitionism and their twisted fetishes. They have no ideology or real politics. They are being used as a battering ram against society, normalcy, tradition, religion. Getting people to knuckle under and forcing them to state that men can be women is like forcing people to state that 2+2=5. The mental degradation is complete, the population has been broken in like a horse.It’s part of the mind control of the population, to get them to say and do whatever is wanted of them. Most proponents of all this, feminists and other ideologues, are heard from because they have a mass media platform which are owned by the billionaire class and are on their payroll. It’s all a top-down social engineering project. There’s never been any grass-roots groundswell demand for any of this, it’s being imposed.
“Destroy the family, destroy society” Vladimir Lenin
Apr 27, 2023 Why are pornographic novels being distributed in elementary schools in the Durham District?
An elementary school-age child is forbidden by law from buying a pornographic magazine at the corner store, yet such material is readily available at the school library. Whatever happened to age appropriateness?
Video Link
Apr 25, 2022 The ‘radical transgender’ has ‘usurped the rights of women and girls’
Former Girl Guides WA Chief Executive Karyn Lisignoli hopes the ‘Respect My Sex If You Want My Vote’ campaign encourages all political parties to change the legislation to “protect the rights of women and girls”.
Video Link
Apr 19, 2023 Teacher who exposed kindergartners to drag queen story time without parental consent must be fired!
Drea Humphrey reports on an activist teacher who exposed kindergartners to a drag queen story time without parental consent, and calls on concerned parents to sign our petition calling for this teacher to be fired.
Video Link
America has become one big gay and black disco. Gays are mentally ill, nigs are mentally-challenged, yet both groups are idolized by government, news and entertainment media, and the education establishment. Superpower indeed.
Glad to be in based China.
Feminists’ hatred and denial of nature are seen in their refusal to accept that the sexes are simply different.
Liberals claim that men and women are equal and interchangeable whereas God only made covenants with men.
I wonder who it is who understands men and women….
My biggest shock was from about 15 years ago, someone on an unsavoury (and fun at the time) site I was participating in posted a political-poster style graphic (grabbed from an ‘Anarchist’ site) screaming
SOME WOMEN HAVE A PENIS
I thought this must be a bad joke or troll, but checked the origin link, and people on the thread were deadly serious about the idea. Really a surprise.
Rowling is a hack writer, I read nothing but a few pages, sure, but it’s a little strange if you take the side of her enemies on this point.
The word is meaningless and too fluid. It’s all totalitarian, centralized command and control. Just use “authoritarian” and/or “totalitarian”. Government AND corporate, private companies are interchangeable and in league with each other.
The difference in practice to the average citizen is negligible.
The fundamental purpose of my website http://www.crushlimbraw.com and library is to fight ignorance – yours – and mine!
OK – where exactly are we now?
I was born in Chicago in 1960, and I’ve lived in the same region all my life. But I find myself wondering every day now, “Where the hell am I? Is this really America?”
http://crushlimbraw.blogspot.com/2023/03/an-old-non-woke-outcast-american.html
To be a respectable American, you must at least pretend to believe preposterous things: Diversity is our strength, men can become women and vice versa, all races are precisely equal, the United States is a wonderful force for good all around the world. But the most preposterous thing you have to believe may be about the biology of race.
http://crushlimbraw.blogspot.com/2022/10/how-can-anyone-think-race-isnt-real-by.html
Nothing we haven’t heard before. But one thing about the “childish” aspect — there is also the child predator aspect of it too. They want to brainwash children and “convert” them to homo-pedo stuff. It’s not so innocent.
I would call it “Talmudic” instead of “leftist.”
https://craignelsen.substack.com/p/the-destructive-creed
“Torah” on trannies https://judaism.is/torah-on-trannies.html • the six ‘genders’ of the satanic insanity known as Talmudic Judaism:
How Hasidic Sages Supported Transgender People — 200 Years Ago by Forverts Staff, July 5, 2018 Yiddish original: http://yiddish.forward.com/articles/210284/a-torah-lesson-on-gender-with-abby-stein/ Reprint in Forward: https://forward.com/culture/404661/how-hasidic-sages-supported-transgender-people-200-years-ago/
A Torah Lesson on Gender with “Abby” Stein: “Isaac was born with the soul of a woman… we know how reincarnation works…Sometimes, for whatever reason, the soul gets switched…”
Video Link
“Somewhere beyond the sea, waiting for me…..”
Video Link
Vaya con Dios….
Video Link
“For some reason these techniques persuade many that what feminists say is true. Equally importantly, they silence those who are not persuaded, leaving feminists a clear field.” The key to defeating this Feminist Dogma is to completely ignore the name calling. Ig nore the Feminist labels of being a ‘sexist’ or a ‘misogynist’. And, here’s a question. WHO lets the Feminists get away with this juvenile tactic of name calling. Why does NO ONE in the MSM question the Feminist method of labeling someone they disagree with as ‘Sexist’ or ‘Misogynist’? Defeating the Feminist “PC” is to attack them regardless of the labels the Feminists use. MAKE the Feminists supporters in the MSM show their biases. It=discredits the MSM every time the MSM defends the Feminists.
As I tell my children, or my wife when she’s acting like a child: If you want contentment and success, deal with the World as it is, not as you wish is it was, or you will never be happy.
I think this is a key difference between the kind of wokeling nonsense that passes for thinking described in the article and those of us who see it for what it is, and a key difference between the left and the right.
The underlying motivation for ‘Transgenders’–and the whole LGBTQ+ movement for that matter is a deep, venomous HATRED for Heterosexuals. This explains why transgenders want to play in Women’s Sports. It explains why LGBTQ+ wants to go into grade schools and preach their “values”. They create “facts” out of thin air such as their belief that there are no real differences between Men and Women. And here the Feminists and their Fellow Travellers the LGBTQ+ movement have a serious problem. Because there ARE differences between Men and Women the most obvious being their physical differences. Deep down inside, the Feminazis KNOW this to be true. So they MUST deny Reality–which they do.
Transgenderism aka trance=genderism is a communist/zionist/satanic front and the zionist demons behind this are straight from the depts of hell.
Rowling’s books are fantasy adventure books for kids and teens. They’re part of the thousands years old kid’s genre. Kids and teens out on their own. Free from parents and house farm and school work Defeating enemies and saving the village
They weren’t written for adults.
Females are obsolete.
In the rapture, wimmin’ will be “snatched up to heaven.” Once they realize there are no men, they will be living in their own private paradise.
The men are still left on earth, which turns into a gigantic Rikers island within a few weeks. Be careful what you ask for guys!
Jul 12, 2023 The publicity stunt of Miss Netherlands being awarded to a trans woman sends all the wrong messages
David Menzies and Alexa Lavoie reacted to the news that a trans woman was crowned Miss Netherlands and will compete for Miss Universe later this year. Rikkie Valerie Kollé will be the second openly trans woman to compete in a Miss Universe competition.
Video Link
There is a noticeable difference. Authoritarians just want complete political power, and f### what the citizens think. Totalitarians want complete control over everything- what every citizen does day to day, even down to what they think.
The US seems to be in a transition from A to T. It started long before I was born with all the agitprop in the lickspittle media corpos. I look at entertainment from before I was born (1990), and the messages are obvious: Marriage is hell. Having children is horrible. Being smart is unattractive and undesirable. Being a functional adult is square and stuffy. Patriotism is the domain of inbred hicks and incels.
Fortunately, I grew up in a happy (and politically active) family who knew how to counteract it all, and I’m now happily married and pregger with my fourth child.
I enjoyed them as a kid. I was sure the author had to be somewhat based. The Wizarding World wasn’t some happy fantasy. It had prejudice and animosity between different species (with all sides having fleshed out reasons), and a corrupt government that was *easily* and effortlessly taken over by the bad guys.
Then I grew up and learned about Rowling’s politics. Professor McGonagall wasn’t her author self insert, it was Dolores Umbridge. (._. )
That being said, I’m glad she’s using her platform to f*** with the trannies.
And she liked one of my tweets. 🙂
I use my XX chromosomes like throwing stars to own the trannies
Just call him MISTER Netherlands.
The corrupt corporate propaganda apparatus distracts the American people with nonsense issues like gay marriage and World War Tranny to cover up the corrupt shenanigans of the ruling class. Mass immigration, globalization, financialization, foreign policy fiascos and more are downplayed while the bullshit stuff is endlessly talked about.
Local papers do the same thing when they never cover the harmful consequences of refugee resettlement. The local newspapers only cover the fluff that don’t mean a damn thing.
Sam Francis, or somebody else, said it was a matter of the corporate media “selling the public a fake America, so the shady goons can steal the real one.” That sounds like what Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg, Bill Gates and Rupert Murdoch are doing.
Good to hear.
I’m still arguing with friends and relatives old enough to be your parents as they claim not to see/hear/read these messages despite it being a phenomenon that I now know has been in place since the 1950s at least.
Agree. It’s a diversion (even if they love it, as in the Weimar era).
I’ve noticed that in Europe and the U.S., as soon as public opinion becomes concerned about the huge and uncontrolled immigration, suddenly, there seems to be nothing more important to discuss than transgenders and other nonsense. The more grotesque and insane the better.
Idem with the war in Ukraine, the elite American, British and French troops are there, and we never know anything about it, but Admiral Rachel Levine’s latest antics, yes.
In the course of this thread mention has been made of Gramsci, social engineering, Frankfurt School, and Herbert Marcuse. For those who are curious how all this ties together, along with ‘woke,’ PC, Critical Theory, etc., here’s an easy read that will be well worth your time.
Cultural Marxism:
How the disciples of an obscure Italian linguist subverted America
https://ammo.com/articles/cultural-marxism-gramsci-how-disciples-of-gramscian-marxism-subverted-america
Granted it’s not a catchy title, but Antonio Gramsci really was onto something when he posited that overthrowing Western governments via violent revolution was unlikely. A better method would be to infiltrate and subvert schools, entertainment, arts, media, government organs, among other institutions.
He knew it would take a long time.
And so it did, but here we are.
“The rebels’ chosen battlefield is the West, where political correctness is mainly found. White people are their particular enemies on earth.”
They didn’t have a choice of ‘battlefields’: no one else would listen to them outside of ‘the West’. White people (colorless zes) are the only ones who listen to them (and from whom they are drawn). So they are correct in believing that once Whites & Whiteness are fully cancelled the problems will disappear; because no one else even cares about it.
It’s funny having feminists fighting agains trannies, because transgenderism is just an extension of feminism.
If anything, feminism is more fucked-up than transgenderism.
A few years ago, I met some girl who worked at a cinema and talked to her for a few minutes afterwards a couple of times. I never made any sexual proposition or anything,I was just talking a bit about movies.
Anyway, apparently the bitch complained to the manager that I was “harassing” her, so that was brought to my attention.
The same thing at work. I worked with female colleagues and more than once criticizing them lead to management complaints.
Imagine if I would complain every time a guy criticized me at work, or even if some faggot tried to hit on me. Who cares!
But women, on one hand, they are such delicate flowers that they can’t even withstand any criticism (or even unwanted attention), but on the other hand, “they are the same and men and can do anything that men do” (and that’s not even mentioning the physical part of course).
Appreciated, Alden, but I read many Brit. boarding school stories, most of Enid Blyton, and others in primary school, so the Rowling formula is too obvious.
Boarding school tale + Enid Blyton + dashes of satanism & faerie = $£$£$£$£$£$.
A simple game. While the H. Pooter series was still going, had the misfortune of encountering a few adults (from U.S.A. and Germany) who were hooked. Pitiable.
I’m afraid the joke’s on you, Old Sport…
Video Link
“This suggests that their originators are conducting a war against God, for to say that something is as it is by nature is only to say that that is the way God made it. ”
And, after an entire article, we come to the REAL REASON for all this BS.
TOTAL DEPRAVITY, and the ‘un-sexing’ of Lady MacBeth come full circle.
This is REBELLION AGAINST YHWH.
And all who engage in it, deserve DEATH.
Romans 1:32, and all.
One aspect of this catastrophe in my opinion, is the manner in which the ‘Left’, having surrendered ideologically to the Right, as we see in the Blair/Hawke/Keating/Starmer ongoing fiascos, and the brutal destruction of the Corbyn insurgency, have turned to Woke ideologies, themselves perversions of true feminism, anti-racism and other ‘radical’ causes. For grown female human beings to support the INTENSELY misogynistic ‘trans’ insanity, with the usual 100% Groupthink, is truly mass insanity, a ‘psychic epidemic’, in action.
Of course some of them are motivated by compassion, cynically manipulated by the transhumanist, paedophile and crude medical pecuniary interests (plus others)behind the lunacy, but have not the intelligence to comprehend the madness of their position, or the bravery to stand up to a mad, braying, mob. It is, I think definitively, the end of the ‘liberal’, ‘progressive’, ‘social democrat’ nonsense, and we see it as well, in the liberal fascist antics of ‘Green’ politicians in the West, particularly Germany. At root, I believe, is the rejection of any class or true economic analysis or understanding, which leaves the field open for dullards who are easily manipulated by the true powers that be. The UK is a very sorry example of where this ends, if not in thermo-nuclear war to protect the sub-fascist Banderite regime in The Ukraine.
There Starmer, the Jewish elite’s anti-Corbyn, and the Blairite thugs in the Labour Party, stand for NOTHING but extirpating the vast Left majority in the party membership, and serving the true rulers of the UK, the rich owners of society. ‘Liberal democracy’ is not just dead, but buried in concrete.
Starmer lies like a lawyer, reneges on ‘promise’ after promise, even puny climate destabilisation remedies, and now brags of being prepared to rule as, more or less, another Tory regime. Anthropogenic climate destabilisation and the global ecological collapse will put an end to all this sad, sorry, palaver, but we will be going into that good night ‘led’ by creatures so loathsome as to be beyond parody.
One hundred and eighty percent arse-about. The ‘progressive’ reaction is against the Left, not of the Left. The Wokeists are all financed by RICH men and women, and the intention is to divert people from politics, class analysis and economic understanding, to meaningless, and futile campaigns over symptoms of elite rule, not that root pathology itself.
It is quintessentially a ‘divide and rule’ tactic, pitting middle-class meanswells against other middle-class and working class people who ought to be their allies, but who are anathematised because they see child surgical and hormonal abuse as anything but ‘gender affirming care’. Scratch a ‘progressive’ and you’ll find a liberal fascist, drooling to sell out for filthy lucre at the first opportunity.
The aspect that gets me is all the REAL women in the competition going along with the fiasco. Were they bribed, threatened or otherwise coerced, or have they NO self-respect? Things verily do fall apart.
The irony in all this is that for many decades trannies were very unwelcome in Male gay bars. If you don’t like wimmin to begin with, why would I like an inflate-a-female freak ?
Back in the good old days when gay men were men and wimmin weren’t even allowed to look in the doorways at what was going on, trannies were shunted into piano bars and lesbo pool halls. So sexually confused and repressed is sex in Amerika now that desperate straight women dress up trashy——so that gay men in dimly lit bars think they are trannies—-and give blow jobs, while their hubbies play pickleball.
LOL
Please see the video in #47.
I watched some of it, thanks. Made a comment on it in another thread.
Really, aside from Miss Holland’s obvious male points (face when not concentrating hard on posing, giant feet and hands relative to stature, etc.), it’s clear from facial expressions that the women don’t like it.
At least Kolle makes an effort, unlike ‘Lia’ Thomas, that N.Z. weightlifter, many young black U.S. runners, Caster Semenya, the many cyclists, more, who make no effort at all on appearance, but just want to compete in women’s events ‘cos they ain’t quite up to the top level in men’s events.
Hello Marielle,
You are quite correct. Authoritarianism is simply top down forced, impressed, and imposed behavior from the top of a government. It is a manifestation of fear of negative consequences and/or an acceptance for some reason, rational or irrational. It inherently has little to do with a person’s belief system or value structure.
Totalitarianism is quite different. The authority and expounder of this phenomenon is Professor Mattias Desmet from Belgium.
https://rumble.com/v1q9xdk-from-the-horses-mouth-understanding-mass-formation-psychosis-i-interviewed-.html
Totalitarianism involves Mass Formation Hypnosis/Psychosis/Delusion. It is dysfunction adaption by the individual with the collective grouping of society that shares his belief. Similar to the True Believer, the individual has so much unresolved and overwhelming anxiety that he subsumes, submerges himself in the hive, collective, or “Borg” in extreme but common cases. At this p[oint, not matter the IQ or education level, he is beyond rational, empirical argument or considerations. Metaphorically, it is an adult fetal position with a pacifier.
An example by Kunstler of his former “friends”-all “liberals” highlights this.
I believe you and Joe Levantine might find the following to your liking. A true kindred spirit for those of us who demand our thoughts be our own with no adulteration or concession:
https://caitlinjohnstone.com
I am looking forward to further reading of your comments.
“We gotta get outta this place, if it’s the last thing we ever do” – song by the Animals.
Since there is no time machine to travel back to the Fifties in Amuckia, the next best thing is move it to Russia.
Back in the USSR:
“I’m a Russian” – – biggest hit song in Russia. I don’t think they are triggered and seek safe spaces when the flag is flown.
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/mKcqOjipI0g
I see that a lot on Gab and other places.
“We didn’t know!”
But I look back at old videos of who they voted for, and I think, could you not see the evil? It radiates from the screen, even after all these years.
I dunno. My spiritualist gradmum said I’m a “sensitive” so maybe that’s it. 🙂
Oh, I’m just a dumb millennial mommy. I just happened to grow up in a politically active family.
Good videos. Thanks.
I think one issue is we always try to frame things now in definitions from the past, when what we face today might be something new even if it borrows Lego blocks from old systems.
It’s like how cyberpunk had a common these of powerful corpos dominating a weak government. I’m not aware of any CP authors who correctly called out the ongoing merging of government and corps we are seeing today.
The whole thing is nuts. How is it that sane 85% of the world’s population puts up with such nonsense? Maybe we do need WWIII to sort out this mess. Let the winner take it all. It’s either us or them!
Richard Knight: “Transgenderism against science”
Here Knight twists the truth out of any contact with reality.
It’s science that is enabling transgenderism, at least in its modern form. Without science, there’d be no knowledge of sex hormones, which are of paramount importance in making the change of sex look convincing. There’s also a great deal of sophisticated science that’s behind the various surgeries that aid in producing such counterfeit people. All this makes it entirely fair to say that transgenderism, as a modern phenomenon, would never have come into existence at all without science.
Richard Knight: “Transgenderism can be seen as a politically correct ideology along with feminism, anti-racism and the others. The main things it has in common with them are a hatred and denial of nature and an impertinent urge to overcome it.”
There is indeed a link between feminism and transgenderism, although of course Knight’s own ideological preconceptions get in the way of him seeing it. Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley, the author of the 1818 novel Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus is usually included on a list of early feminists. As everyone knows, the story revolves around the efforts of a scientist named Victor Frankenstein to create life by stitching together parts of corpses, and infusing the result with electrical fire. He does this not out of hatred and denial of nature, but as an expression of admiration for it. The creature he creates could as easily have been female as male, obviously, which suggests that in a world in which science predominates, sex is changeable; merely a matter of which body parts are chosen. It’s a point of interest and perhaps not entirely a coincidence that the first of the Frankenstein movies came out in 1931, the same year that Lili Elbe received a womb transplant and vaginoplasty in a gender reassignment surgery at the Hirschfeld clinic.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lili_Elbe
Like the creature created by Victor Frankenstein, today’s transsexuals evoke the same mixture of horror, fascination, and fear among many in the general populace. Like the creature, as we have seen in recent news reports, sometimes they run amok and murder their persecutors. Is it a case of life imitating art? Or the reverse?
Richard Knight: “If one views political correctness as a collection of ideologies, … their originators are conducting a war against God, for to say that something is as it is by nature is only to say that that is the way God made it.”
The way God made it, or Frankenstein?
What if some quasi-sapient primate chose to identify itself as transparent? Could it then hope to meet another like itself, and potentially experience transparenthood together?
“Men must be keeping women down”
That very concept itself ADMITS that the genders are different–that men have the innate ability to somewhat monopolize the positions of power.