RSS
Everyone complains about the Left, but no one does anything about it. Or so it would seem. Part of the problem, I suspect, is that many in the public have mistaken notions about what “the Left” is and how it operates, and thus they more or less mindlessly support it, or oppose it, as the case may be. Hence it is high time for a hard look at this nefarious political entity, in order to devise better and more appropriate responses to it.
Let’s start with conventional views. A constant theme of right-wing and conservative commentators is that the Left dominates America today. This holds true across nearly the entire spectrum of conservatism, from the dissident- and alt-Right to conventional Republicans, to Pat Buchanan, to Fox News, to the Wall Street Journal, to the pro-Trump crowd. In fact, it’s about the only thing they all agree on. The primary concern seems to focus on media and on politics, the latter via the Democrats and the Biden regime. Many would include academia, Hollywood, and the public schools as well. Furthermore, this is universally seen on the Right as a disaster—and it is a disaster, but for reasons other than they presume—as well as something that poses a fundamental threat to America, to the “American way of life,” and to our very health and well-being. The Left, apparently, is the root of all evil.
But what exactly is “the Left,” and why are they so evil? This is rarely explained, likely because it is a relatively complicated matter that requires more than the usual 10 seconds of thinking. Given the importance of the topic and the seriousness of the threat, however, we need to dive a bit more deeply into it.
To anticipate my main conclusion: I think “the Left” is largely misnamed and misconceived—it is a kind of diversionary concept invented to distract from the real power-brokers and the real conflicts at hand. “The Left” is actually a kind of fake Left, portrayed as opposing “the Right,” which is in reality a fake Right. The net effect is to create a false antagonism and to encourage the unthinking masses to pick sides, even as they ultimately support the same side in the end. Unsurprisingly, the Jewish Lobby plays a large role here, as I will show.
Real Leftism
I think many would be surprised to hear that real leftism is not what is commonly portrayed, and that it is actually (gasp!) not so bad. At the risk of being pedantic, let’s look at standard definitions of both “Left” and “liberal,” since these seem to nominally be at the heart of the problem. As I like to say, we need to know what we are talking about, if we hope to make any progress on these vital issues. Here, then, is a typical definition of “Left”:
Left n, cap a: those professing views usually characterized by desire to reform or overthrow the established political order, and usually advocating change in the name of the greater freedom or well-being of the common man. b: a radical (as distinct from conservative) position.
Thus stated, this is relatively benign. Anyone unhappy with an existing political administration will of necessity seek to reform or replace it, and thus we can all agree with this. However, it is surprising to see the Left defined as striving for increased freedom for the average individual, when today it is more common to decry the “liberty-loathing left.” It is true that those in power are working to diminish or restrict peoples’ freedoms—but this doesn’t make them leftists. In fact it makes them anti-leftists, at least on this definition. More problematically, we can have no doubt that “the Right” in anything like current forms, including neo-con and Judeo-Trumpian conservatism, would certainly (and in some cases did) institute their own forms of liberty restriction; hence ‘liberty-loathing’ is no hallmark of “the Left.”
As to the “radical” aspect, I would argue that this is largely in the eye of the beholder. To be a radical in this sense is simply to press for far-reaching and qualitative change, as opposed to “tinkering around the edges,” which can be considered a conservative approach. Clearly one can be a “radical right-winger” as much as one can be a “radical leftist,” and so part (b) does not offer much illumination.
What about “liberal,” or more generally, “liberalism”? Here’s what we might find:
liberalism n: a political philosophy based on belief in progress, the essential goodness of man, and the autonomy of the individual, and standing for the protection of political and civil liberties.
Again, we find woefully little to object to here. I think we all are in favor of “progress,” even though we may have different ideas about what exactly that means. What about “the essential goodness of man”? That’s a strange phrase. It is almost a religious idea, almost like saying we are all “children of God” or something. But that’s nonsense. I guess we can agree that most people, most of the time, are good; but still, there are bad, malevolent, and detestable people out there whom I would never declare to be “essentially good.” That phrase might have been better stated as a general optimism about human nature, perhaps. And I can agree to this. I am generally optimistic about humanity; it is primarily aberrant conditions that cause the worst in people to come out. In a mass technological society, “people” can seem incredibly dull, ignorant, and short-sighted, but this is more a consequence of social structure than anything else. Much more needs to be said on this, but I defer that to another time.
“Autonomy of the individual” and “protecting civil liberties” are again, perhaps, a surprise. But they should not be. Liberalism, like liberal, derives from the Latin liber (free). A liberal is, literally, a free thinker; a key part of the definition of ‘liberal’ is the idea of “one who is open-minded.” Who among us does not claim to be open-minded? Hence a true liberal is a free-thinking, autonomous, civil libertarian. But doesn’t that describe the vast majority of “the Right”? What are we to make of this?
We are beginning to see the nature of the problem. Many of us, based on these definitions, would be forced to call ourselves “leftists” and “liberals.” And yet, many would never do this, even on pain of death. Somehow, politics has either become detached from reality, or it has altered the basic meaning of words so much that we, collectively, and quite literally, do not know what we are talking about. Or perhaps a bit of both.
If nothing else, all this suggests that the stereotypical right-left distinction has become almost meaningless, likely as part of a deliberate strategy of obfuscation. Clearly a more precise analysis is called for.
The Structure of the Fake American Left
The Left as commonly portrayed—the fake Left—is in reality a two-tiered system, composed of a small number of ideological leaders and propagators, and a large mass of people who generally self-identify as “Democrats” or “liberals.” In America today, ‘Democrat’ and ‘Left’ are virtually coextensive; nearly all Democrats are leftists, and nearly all leftists are Democrats. The terms are almost interchangeable. But here, I will focus on ‘Left’ and ‘leftism’ since that terminology has a broader international meaning than the American-only party of Democrats.
More revealing is who these people are. The elite leftists today are almost exclusively either Jews (of political, corporate, or academic stripe) or Gentiles, mostly White, working for and on behalf of Jews. (Whether these Gentile lackeys are aware of their subservient status or not, and whether they care, are good questions that I can’t address here.) In other words, the elite Left are either Jews or people beholden to Jews. Either way, Jewish interests and Jewish issues predominate.
We know this because, firstly, so many of the Democratic elite are themselves Jews (Bernie Sanders, Chuck Schumer, Adam Schiff, George Soros, Jerry Nadler, Dianne Feinstein, Michael Bloomberg, Tom Steyer, Janet Yellen, Tony Blinken, Rochelle Walensky…) or have Jewish family members (Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Nancy Pelosi, Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton, the Cuomo family). The pervasive Jewish presence in the Democratic Party is a fact never mentioned in the MSM, and rarely discussed even by their strongest right-wing opponents.[1]It will be a cold day in hell before Tucker Carlson or Sean Hannity ever speak explicitly about the Jews on the Left. This should tell us something.
Secondly, we know that a large majority of Democratic campaign money comes from Jewish sources. Over the past few decades, reported percentages of Democratic totals range from “about half,”[2]Jewish Power, by J. J. Goldberg (1996), p. 277. to 50%,[3]Jerusalem Post (27 Sep 2016). to “as much as 60%,”[4]Washington Post (13 Mar 2003), p. A1. to “over 60%,”[5]Jewish Power in America, by B. Feingold (2008), p. 4. to as much as 2/3,[6]Jewish Telegraphic Agency (7 Jun 2011). to “70% of large contributions,”[7]The Hill (30 Mar 2004), p. 1. to 80-90%.[8]Passionate Attachment, by Ball and Ball (1992), p. 218. A recent study, “The Jewish Vote 2020,” cites a number of relevant statistics, including these:
- In the 2016 cycle, all of the top seven biggest donors overall were Jews (p. 11).
- The top 10 donors in 2016 gave $406 million, of which $357 million—an amazing 88%—was from Jews (p. 14).
- Of the top 50 donors in 2016, 20 (40%) were Jews (p. 14).
- And it reconfirms that, today, Jews comprise roughly 50% of “big individual donors” to Democrats, and 25% of the same for Republicans (p. 11).
Late in 2020, in the run-up to the presidential election, it was reported that 15 of the top 25 donors (for both parties combined), or 60%, were Jews. Top Democratic donors were Steyer ($54 million), Don Sussman ($22 million), James Simons ($21 million), Michael Bloomberg ($19 million), Deborah Simon ($12 million), Henry Laufer ($12 million), Josh Bekenstein ($11 million), Stephen Mandel ($9 million), Soros ($8 million—although he funnels many other donations through various nonprofits), and Steve Ballmer ($8 million). These days, anything less than $10 million barely warrants mention.
So much for politics. What about leftist media? We know the main culprits: CNN, MSNBC, the New York Times, and the Washington Post. Unsurprisingly, Jews fill top spots at all these organizations or their parent companies. CNN’s president is Jeff Zucker, and is owned by Warner Media, with Jason Kilar as CEO. MSNBC is owned by NBC Universal, with CEO Jeff Shell, and top execs Robert Greenblatt, Bonnie Hammer, Noah Oppenheim, and Ron Meyer. The NYT has been Jewish-owned and -operated since 1896; the current owner and publisher is Arthur Sulzberger. The Washington Post has been Jewish-owned and -operated since 1933, with the possible exception of current owner Jeff Bezos (status unknown), who acquired it from the Jewish Graham family in 2013 (“at the suggestion of his friend, Don Graham”).[9]This fact alone is damning; I know of no instance in which Jews have sold a major media company to a non-Jew. And the fact that Bezos turned over operations of Amazon to another Jew, Andy Jassy, is a further indication. We could include various other media entities, such as NPR Radio; elsewhere (note 10) I have shown that its on-air staff is over half Jewish.
In support of political and media Jews are the leftist “Big Tech” Jews, who include the likes of Mark Zuckerberg and Sheryl Sandberg (Facebook), Larry Page and Sergei Brin (Google), Larry Ellison and Safra Catz (Oracle), Susan Wojcicki (YouTube), Steve Ballmer, Andy Jassy (Amazon), Marc Benioff, and Michael Dell (Dell computers). Thus, between money, power, media, and technology, the leftist elite—Jews and their sycophants—have a near monopoly on discourse in America and much of the West.
What about the base of the fake Left? This is a large group of individuals, mostly White, who have been deluded as to the true nature of that ideology. We can get a rough idea of numbers by considering the fact that Biden received about 80 million votes, of which some 72% were Whites; thus, there are about 55 million Whites who presumably identify with or favor the leftist Democrats. To this number we can add the 15 million Blacks and 10 million Latinos who also voted for Biden. The leftist base is thus about 80 million people. This is a large number, though not overwhelming in a nation of 330 million.
By contrast, Trump earned about 50 million White votes; another 50 million or so Whites did not vote. Hence, in rough terms, the (fake) Left has a grip on only about one-third of Whites; two-thirds elude their grasp. This is a good sign—perhaps the best news among a raft of bad omens. Something like 100 million Whites are either opposed, or potentially opposed, to leftist ideology. There is much to build on here.
In sum, the nominal Left is a fake Left, adhering to virtually nothing of the meaning of a true leftism. Rather, it is influenced and run, directly and indirectly, by wealthy and influential Jews. This fake Left is a Jewish Left, ideologically speaking, and it operates largely by and for Jewish interests. Likewise with liberalism, which today is a fake liberalism: an ideology that is fully aligned with Jewish interests. In fact, the marriage of convenience between Jews and liberalism has long been known. Consider this revealing passage:
Throughout the nineteenth century and later, the fate of the Jews would be linked inextricably with that of liberalism itself. Their loyalty to liberalism would be intense and abiding, nurtured on gratitude for rights received and determination to establish a permanent place for the Jews in the modern European world. Liberals, although scarcely ecstatic over persistent Jewish religious and social particularism, would reciprocate with toleration and increasing measures of equality before the law. Both parties, but especially the Jews, would be acutely aware that Jewish emancipation stood or fell with the fortunes of liberalism.[10]The Jews in Weimar Germany, by Don Niewyk (1980), p. 1.
For well over a century, a majority of Jews have allied themselves with liberalism and leftism solely because it served their interests—the welfare of native populations be damned. In a sense, they hijacked an otherwise virtuous ideology and perverted it to their own benefit.
The Real Right
Now that we have done some preliminary analysis of the Left, let’s turn to the Right. In a popular sense, the Right has some stereotypical characterizations. We know the catchphrases: “Guns, God, and country”; “Don’t tread on me”; “Liberty or death”; and various takes on the notion of freedom. Again, these are constant themes across the conservative spectrum.
But how do these conventional ideas match up with the formal notion of “the Right”? Earlier I cited standard definitions of ‘Left’ and ‘liberal,’ and to be fair, I need to do the same for their nominal counterparts, ‘Right’ and ‘conservatism’. Here they are:
Right n, cap (1) individuals favoring traditional attitudes and practices, and sometimes advocating the forced establishment of an authoritarian political order. (2) a group or party that favors conservative, traditional, or sometimes authoritarian attitudes and policies.
conservatism n: a political philosophy based on tradition and social stability, stressing established institutions, and preferring gradual development to abrupt change.
As before, there are some surprises—mostly in what is not here. On the one hand, we find an emphasis on tradition and stability, gradual change (“reform”), and potentially anti-democratic policy, if this is how we may interpret ‘forced authoritarianism’ in this context. On the other, we notice what is missing: God, religion, rights, liberty, freedom. Nothing on “small government.” Even terms like ‘nation’ and ‘country’ are absent. What are we to make of this?
It would seem that, as with the Left, that the Right has also been distorted from its formal and definitional meaning into a kind of caricature. The current obsession with religion, freedom, patriotism, and formal democracy have been introduced by those who would like to divert people away from the true ruling entities in the US—Jewish money and power, Judeophilic lackeys, the ultra-rich, and a techno-industrial system that is spinning out of control—in order to confuse and distract the masses.
A true Right, composed of true conservatives, would do the following:
- They would be less concerned about formal, representative democracy and more about the integrity of society, human welfare, and long-term sustainability of their own people. If this demands the use of “undemocratic” policies, so be it.
- They would actively oppose any corrupt and malevolent minority from attacking the basis of society and from seeking to exploit it for their personal gain.
- They would strive for social homogeneity, both racially and ethnically, knowing that multicultural and multiracial societies are inevitably prone to conflict, disruption, instability, and ultimately decay.
- They would oppose an advancing high-tech society, knowing that potent and uncontrollable technologies not only empower our social overlords but also destroy traditional society, damage human health, and promote the destruction of the natural world upon which all real stability is grounded.
- They would support the disintegration of large, unstable political systems like modern America and encourage the devolution and decentralization of political power; large complex societies have, of necessity, more laws, more constraints, and less freedom. They are also more easily manipulated by unscrupulous minorities.
Incidentally, one troubling fact of the January 6 “insurrection” is that most of the people there were pro-America and pro-democracy (or so it is claimed). But true conservatives would not hold these views. True conservatives realize that “America,” in both practice and theory, is anti-conservative and unsustainable. America needs to be replaced with something else—something new, something different, something that will protect and defend the social well-being of the American majority and the ecological basis for it.[11]More needs to be said on this, which I will address in a subsequent essay. Sadly, very few of the “insurrectionists” seem to have had any conception of the Judeocracy that rules over them and which dictates much of what Trump does and says; this strongly suggests that they severely misread the real basis of American power politics. Most of those people, I would suggest, are members of the “fake Right”—a manipulated and distorted ideology that serves the purposes of the ruling Jewish elite.
The True Problems with “the Left”
Returning to the main theme, the fake Left is a heavily Jewish enterprise. But most people, Left and Right, don’t know this or don’t acknowledge it, and they therefore don’t object to that fact. When those on the Right object to the Left, it is usually to more concrete (but secondary) issues. We can make a short list: leftists are for “big government”; they support “open borders”; they want to take our guns; they stifle our freedom of speech (or freedom generally); they are authoritarian; they conduct “cancel culture”; they demonize Whites; they are anti-Christian; they tyrannize the public, as via their over-hyped Covid panic; they “tax and spend.” Maybe even “they hate America” (if we listen to Tucker Carlson). Doubtless we could add more, but I think this covers the main concerns for most on the Right.
I cannot argue with these points; I think all of them are basically true. But there are deeper factors at work that help to explain this collective phenomenon, which is why we need to press a bit harder to really understand the process at work here.
When I consider the many objectionable features of what is called the Left, I compile a different sort of list. For what it’s worth, I find it to have the following negative qualities:
A desire to impose their beliefs and values on others. This is the “controlling,” “authoritarian,” and “liberty-loathing” aspect. Leftist liberals seem to have an inordinate need to compel others to follow their belief-system. They are the antithesis of “live and let live.” They have little or no tolerance for dissenting views, especially those that threaten their own positions. They know that rational dissent will severely undermine their credibility, and so they suppress it.[12]Again, the Left has no monopoly on this issue. The Right can be just as imposing.
They are blind to the realities of race, biology, and genetics. For the Left, most all of human nature is a “social construction”—something pliable and malleable, something that can be defined and redefined almost at will. Humans are merely a plastic biology; the many races are rather like different colors of Playdough, all equally moldable into new shapes and forms. This results in an over-inclusive and naïve egalitarianism.
But this is not reality. The fact is that there are profound and unalterable differences between human beings, both between and within races. These are manifest in physical, mental, emotional, psychological, and cultural ways. They are rooted in genetics, and cannot be wished away. But leftists have deeply imbibed the fallacy of human equality. Many are also functional relativists who cannot bear to make value distinctions. (I should note here the difference between the leftist elite, who espouse views that they don’t really believe, and the naïve leftist masses, who generally do seem to believe them.) As a result, leftists say incredibly stupid things and make incredibly stupid policy proposals.
No concept of a noble humanity. When one swallows the myth of human equality, one condemns the human race to a miserable mediocrity. If all are equal, then none are better, and in fact no one can be better. Equality denies the existence of superior individuals, who are the very ones that drive society forward. When such superior individuals do appear—as they inevitably do—they are suppressed, censored, attacked, perhaps jailed, perhaps killed. Superior individuals put the lie to the myth of equality, which is one reason why they are so dangerous to the Left. Because leftists have repudiated the whole concept of a noble humanity, they represent a profound threat to human well-being. They effectively destroy the future of our race.
A pathology of pity. Leftists are pity-mongers in the extreme. They wallow in pity. They praise pity. And they sell pity.[13]One need only watch any episode of popular television shows, especially so-called reality TV. Shows like “American Idol” or “Dancing with the Stars” or “America’s Got Talent” are endless parades of sob stories. Crying contestants are de rigueur. Great individuals and great societies do not wallow in pity. They accept pain, hardship, and loss, and then they move on. They give a fair respect to all of humanity, but they don’t elevate the lesser or the weak. They don’t allow the lesser to dominate or even to consume inordinate time or resources. The lesser of one’s own race are cared for, quietly, and the lesser of other races are excluded. Such an approach can seem harsh, but such is life.
Dangerous and possibly fatal naiveté. By accepting false but comforting myths, by failing to address the real threats to society, by adopting a de facto philo-Semitism, and by wallowing in an over-socialized and misdirected form of pity, leftists dodge the hard reality of the modern world. In doing so, they doom society to inevitable suffering and decay. Life is hard, evolution can be brutal, and choices are painful. Leftists, though, prefer the easy way out; they seek to avoid all conflict and confrontation, and are happy to surrender control of their lives to, for example, a Jewish elite who would like nothing more than to use them, exploit them, and utterly crush them in the end.
Only by addressing these deeper failings of the Left can we get to the root of the problem.
Where Is the Opposition?
As I mentioned above, all sectors of the Right oppose leftism, but most are half-hearted—or worse. Let’s take a specific example. Perhaps the most visible and vocal critic of the Left is Tucker Carlson of Fox News. In my essay Dissecting Tucker Carlson, I have critiqued his modus operandi, but here I want to emphasize his deeper alignment with the Left.
Let’s compare Carlson’s worldview to that of the typical leftist. (A) The leftist, being a naïve egalitarian, is an anti-racist. He believes deeply in human equality. He is pro-democracy (at least verbally) and he supports “America.” He is materialistic; he strives for a thriving economy, economic growth, and material prosperity. Most importantly, he is philosemitic; he supports Israel, defends Jewish interests, promotes Jewish ideology, and gives free reign to Jewish voices. The leftist never ‘outs’ Jews, never really criticizes Israel, never seeks to limit Jewish dominance in government, finance, media, or academia, and never calls to restrict their activities. In this way, the leftist maintains his status and material well-being.
(B) Tucker Carlson, being a naïve egalitarian, is an anti-racist. He believes deeply in human equality. He is pro-democracy (at least verbally) and he supports “America.” He is materialistic; he strives for a thriving economy, economic growth, and material prosperity. Most importantly, he is philosemitic; he supports Israel, defends Jewish interests, promotes Jewish ideology, and gives free reign to Jewish voices. Carlson never ‘outs’ Jews, never really criticizes Israel, never seeks to limit Jewish dominance in government, finance, media, or academia, and never calls to restrict their activities. In this way, Carlson maintains his status and material well-being.
I trust that we can see the similarities here.[14]There are, of course, differences: Carlson is anti-immigration, pro-Christian, Covid-skeptical, and withering in his critique of the Biden regime. But the similarities are more significant and more consequential than the differences. And yet Carlson is supposedly an exemplary member of “the Right.” Sadly, he is not alone; the above description applies to a large majority of the nominal Right. This is precisely why the alleged Right is a fake Right, and why so many populist conservatives are fake conservatives.
If Carlson and others were true right-wingers, and true conservatives, they would display the characteristics I cited above. They would be openly and explicitly anti-minority, anti-egalitarian, explicitly “racist” (or “racialist”), anti-Semitic, pro-environment, anti-technology (and not just anti-Big Tech), and perhaps even anti-democratic. They might be anti-capitalist, knowing the disruption caused by unrestrained free-market capitalism. God forbid, they might even be a little socialist! They would be not so much patriotic—which implies a kind of naïve acceptance of the ruling class and the existing political order—but rather truly nationalist, in the sense of defending the interests one’s own race and ethnicity, which is, after all, the true basis of a “nation.”[15]‘Nation’ comes from Latin natus or natio, that is, those who are “born together,” or of similar birth.
Where, then, are the true conservatives? Where lies the true Right? It is almost impossible to find, even in the big wide world of the Internet. Thank God for organizations like The Occidental Observer, The Unz Review, and National Vanguard, who are willing to call a spade a spade. Thank God for individuals like Kevin MacDonald and Andrew Anglin, William White Williams and David Duke, who are willing to speak openly and intelligently about the Jewish Question. Thank God for the small circle of leading Holocaust revisionists, who work relentlessly to undermine the keystone of Jewish mendacity.[16]Among whom I would include Germar Rudolf, Carlo Mattogno, and Jürgen Graf. Any discussion of Holocaust revisionism that does not mention these men is not worth its salt. Without such individuals, we would be lost. With them, we have hope.
The Way Forward
In sum, the popular Left-Right divide in American politics is a fake dichotomy, constructed by and serving the interests of a Jewish elite and their well-paid Gentile lackeys. When people focus all their attention and energy on this contrived distinction, they are distracted from, and thus overlook, the true and deeper causes of social crisis in this country. The fake Right and the fake Left both serve their Jewish masters. Only by moving beyond this superficial divide can we get to the root of things.
There are positive aspects of both real leftism and real conservatism. We should indeed be open-minded, free-thinking, non-dogmatic, and progress-oriented. We should indeed defend individual autonomy, and political and civil liberty, while promoting the better instincts of humanity. At the same time, we should be truly nationalist: that is, defending the integrity and well-being of White Americans. We should work toward a relatively homogenous, monocultural, mono-ethnic nation, which is the only type of nation proven to be stable and sustainable. We should be ardent environmentalists, preserving wild nature, expanding wilderness, and protecting indigenous species; without this, we cannot hope for a flourishing society. We should put sharp limits on free-marketeers, finance capitalists, and financial speculators; if this means moving toward a limited socialism, so be it.
Above all, we should end the constant clamor over the bogus Left-Right confrontation, and focus on what really matters: subverting the dominant Judeocracy, creating a manageable and ethnically-uniform nation (or nations), and getting down to the hard work of restoring a sane society. I fear that we haven’t much time to spare.
Thomas Dalton, PhD, has authored or edited several books and articles on politics, history, and religion, with a special focus on National Socialism in Germany. His works include a new translation series of Mein Kampf, and the books Eternal Strangers (2020), The Jewish Hand in the World Wars (2019), and Debating the Holocaust (4th ed, 2020). Most recently he has edited a new edition of Rosenberg’s classic work Myth of the 20th Century and a new book of political cartoons, Pan-Judah!. All these works are available at www.clemensandblair.com. For all his writings, see his personal website www.thomasdaltonphd.com.
Notes
[1] It will be a cold day in hell before Tucker Carlson or Sean Hannity ever speak explicitly about the Jews on the Left.
[2] Jewish Power, by J. J. Goldberg (1996), p. 277.
[3] Jerusalem Post (27 Sep 2016).
[4] Washington Post (13 Mar 2003), p. A1.
[5] Jewish Power in America, by B. Feingold (2008), p. 4.
[6] Jewish Telegraphic Agency (7 Jun 2011).
[7] The Hill (30 Mar 2004), p. 1.
[8] Passionate Attachment, by Ball and Ball (1992), p. 218.
[9] This fact alone is damning; I know of no instance in which Jews have sold a major media company to a non-Jew. And the fact that Bezos turned over operations of Amazon to another Jew, Andy Jassy, is a further indication.
[10] The Jews in Weimar Germany, by Don Niewyk (1980), p. 1.
[11] More needs to be said on this, which I will address in a subsequent essay.
[12] Again, the Left has no monopoly on this issue. The Right can be just as imposing.
[13] One need only watch any episode of popular television shows, especially so-called reality TV. Shows like “American Idol” or “Dancing with the Stars” or “America’s Got Talent” are endless parades of sob stories. Crying contestants are de rigueur.
[14] There are, of course, differences: Carlson is anti-immigration, pro-Christian, Covid-skeptical, and withering in his critique of the Biden regime. But the similarities are more significant and more consequential than the differences.
[15] ‘Nation’ comes from Latin natus or natio, that is, those who are “born together,” or of similar birth.
[16] Among whom I would include Germar Rudolf, Carlo Mattogno, and Jürgen Graf. Any discussion of Holocaust revisionism that does not mention these men is not worth its salt.
English
Arabic
Chinese (Simplified)
Dutch
French
German
Hebrew
Hindi
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Russian
Spanish
Swedish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Was this article a homework assignment?
The problem with both “leftism”, and with “rightism” (whether fake or not), and regardless of whether or not they are ultimately controlled by a Jewish elite, is that both “sides” are dedicated to the promotion of government solutions to social problems caused primarily by government, and receive their support from people still naive and unaware enough to believe in government solutions to their problems.
Both sides are wings of the same bird of prey -the state. Both are part of the false dichotomy that maintains the illusion of choice.
And the author Dalton is no different. He is just as idiotically enthusiastic for government solutions to problems that government has caused as is the average liberal or conservative:
“We should put sharp limits on free-marketeers, finance capitalists, and financial speculators; if this means moving toward a limited socialism, so be it”.
This “just”in:
whether predominantly “left” or “right” in policy, and regardless of whether it is controlled by Jews or not, the state is, and has always been, a wholly criminal entity:
“Because they are all ultimately funded via both direct and indirect theft [taxes], and counterfeiting [central bank monopolies], all governments are essentially, at their very cores, 100% corrupt criminal scams which cannot be “reformed”or “improved”,simply because of their innate criminal nature.” onebornfree
Furthermore, government solutions never work anyway. They never have, they never will:
“The kind of man who wants the government to adopt and enforce his ideas is always the kind of man whose ideas are idiotic” H.L.Mencken
“Government doesn’t work” Harry Browne
https://wiki.mises.org/wiki/Why_Government_Doesn%27t_Work
Conclusion: there is no hope for the US until enough people come to their senses and come to understand:
1) That governments are wholly criminal, unreformable org.s….
2) Government “solutions” never work, they always make a situation even worse than it was before.
Regards,onebornfree
Once again, I feel compelled to defend Tucker Carlson. As I’m sure that Mr. Dalton knows, if Tucker raised the JQ head on, he’d be quickly removed from the air, no matter that it would (temporarily) sink Fox News ratings.
Tucker is the only TV political opinion show I watch on a regular basis. He is consistently against US imperialist wars (wars for Israel) promoted by Neocon Zionists, and has denounced both the ADL and the SPLC. He is fundamentally against immigration, both illegal and legal, and, on several occasions, he said the number should be zero. And he vigorously opposes the mainstream Covid narrative, Fauci’s medical tyranny, and senile Biden’s destructive vaxx mandates. He raises the issue of black criminality, for which he is called a Racist. These are Rightist positions which I believe Dalton would support.
Tucker said he is free to say what he thinks, and that Fox doesn’t censor any of his content. On that issue, I think he is somewhat less than honest. He knows how far he can go without the Murdoch brothers firing him, so he self-censors. If it wasn’t for his high TV ratings, the highest of any show of its kind in history, I think he knows he would have been fired long ago. Tucker, above all, is a TV survivor. Kudos to him. A somewhat compromised Tucker, educating his millions of viewers in a compelling and entertaining way, is still much better than anyone else on cable news. Save your scorn for Hannity.
Well said. Tucker is a treasure. Dr. Dalton’s view, I assume, is that Tucker steals support from better voices, but in truth Tucker likely steals from worse voices. I don’t watch tv, but I’m constantly seeing Tucker clips online. Richard Spencer seems sick of Tucker, but Spencer is just misapplying his ideas.
Dr. Dalton’s concept is good here, but I like Tucker. Btw, any discussion of capitalism vs socialism should mention… distributism! Power to the people, not to the managerial bureaucrats.
Jews might be in a peaceful civil war currently, between Zionism and empire. I don’t even understand Ehud Barak vs Netanyahu.
The market god is a false god. Anarchists are nuts.
Not a word about money. Not a word about the economic left.
This is classic disinformation. It isn’t even wrong.
Because none of the above matters.
What matters is who’s got the money, who doesn’t, and where we who doesn’t can git some.
Lefty Jimmy Dore often spotlights fake leftists like Biden and Harris:
Video Link
The left is jews; jews are the left.
Liberalism is a cover for the interests of organized jewry.
And sadly….the right are also bought off shabbos goy shitheads, paid to allow the leftist jews to run rampant and create utter chaos and misery.
So, there is no way forward other than secession and separation, but I doubt the jews will allow that, as they intend to fully destroy white people once and for all.
jewsh donors control both sides so it’s actually a uni-party.
Trey Gowdy or Josh Hawley or Jim Jordan (or whoever is the current head of Kabuki Theater) will call out Garland (or whatever jew is misbehaving at the moment) and make a big show…..and then do exactly nothing (as they are paid to roll over and lose the fight)
Most of the political “leaders” deserve to be executed for high treason on the issue of immigration alone.
And the criminality of the BLM riots and covid communism…..my God.
So much of ‘intelligence’ is bogus. It’s more about the cult of being ‘smart’.
Being educated is to join the Intelligentry. It’s not about thinking hard and critically but having the ‘correct’ thoughts.
As for white power, just call it wower.
“Wow, we are for wower!”
That’s cooler.
Seems to me it all comes down to masculine vs. feminine, anyway.
It’s NOT Mere “Left vs. Right”; It’s Objective vs. Subjective, Determinism vs. Perfectly “Free” Will
Dalton certainly deserves an “E” for effort in his attempt to analyze this putrid cultural situation, and surely he makes some good and worthwhile observations of practical nature, especially regarding such as Tucker Carlson’s foolish partiality to Jews, which Jews control “both sides” of any political controversy–as Jews have all the (fake) currency, not real money.
And “left” vs. “right” is just a sham circus show for the fools, goons, and suckers who are over-populated in this present cultural situation of the degenerate West long past its expiration date, in accord w. Oswald Spengler’s CYCLIC description/analysis of history and “Decline of the West.” It’s not “left vs. right,” but rather Satanism/subjectivism vs. the remnants of the previous healthy culture which featured the objective, Aristotelian view of reality.
For the one side, which dominates today, is the Satanists, outright subjectivists of extremist nature, subjectivism being philosophy that reality is product of mind/consciousness, making the subject to be creator–thus to be God, thus Satanism. Foremost example is Immanuel Kant who took the Western culture by storm as early as late 18th cent.
Jews feature this very subjectivism as key, essential item of their “religion,” the “Oral Law Trad.,” “midrash” (interpretation), and Talmud made up of the first part, “Mishnah,” midrash of Torah, then Gemara, the other part of Talmud, being the midrash of Mishnah–everything is subjective and interpretation–all for the purposes of Jews. See Talmudical.blogspot.com, Come-and-hear.com, and TruthTellers.org for best Talmudic expo.
Thus it’s no accident the Rothschilds, et al., have dominated since the Napoleonic era w. their central-banking featuring the legalized counterfeiting of fiat-currency (see Mises.org for expo; use their site search-engine for particular economic terms). Thus we see the Satanists just making-up (literal counterfeiting) their own “money” (really just currency) by which they buy up everything and everybody, as we plainly see today, Satanists always controlling both sides of any political issue.
Thus as racism/racialism follows fm the objective view, hence determinism (absolute cause-effect), race providing necessary circumstances for any individual, we see the Satanist assault against racialism so prominent, leading their entire satanistic, genocidal program designed to de-populate the earth and humanity, in accord w. agenda-21 and -2030–which they’re effecting, enforcing, and applying at this very minute, as we speak, by means of their poison clot-shots in the “covid” travesty before our very eyes.
So what can be done in this grim cultural warfare?–the Satanists should be exposed, and the way to oppose them is taking away their primary instruments, like the central-bank counterfeiting operation, totally criminal and un-Constitutional, and then the breaking apart of Jew S A tyranny by means of asserting sovereignty of the states, in accord w. the tenth Amendment–see TenthAmendmentCenter.com. And real Christianity, worship of TRUTH (= Christ, Gosp. JOHN 14:6), means anti-Satanism (JOHN 8:44) and hence anti-Semitism, suckers–get a clue.
Left n, cap a: those professing views usually characterized by desire to reform or overthrow the established political order, and usually advocating change in the name of the greater freedom or well-being of the common man. b: a radical (as distinct from conservative) position.
The left has indeed traditionally supported overthrowing the natural order for the sake of equality along with promises of freedom. This goes back to the French revolution where the main motive was overthrowing a rigid class system. While they advocated for freedom from religion they also brought in all of their own rules for the individual. Much of the upper class was simply executed for being too unequal. So freedom only increased in certain areas and for certain groups.
Once Marxism came into fruition the left no longer cared about individual freedom. They started to view individual freedom as a threat to progress. Marx openly wrote that the state becomes everything. That view continues today with the modern left. It really isn’t about freedom as they have pretty much gained the freedoms they wanted. The typical leftist has a long list of laws and restrictions they would like to pass and especially against Whites. They would shut down this website if they could and send the main writers to camps. So I don’t think the modern leftist cares at all about increasing freedom.
I distinguish left vs liberal with the former being more radical and the later being more establishment and feelings based. Leftists have no care for individual freedom but are more likely to make economic changes. Liberals are the order and seek to undermine mainstream Whites to prevent a serious challenge from developing. Conservatism really isn’t competition since the elections are cyclical and the Tucker Carlsons won’t seriously challenge the race narrative.
It is indeed all fake in a way. It’s all kind of silly establishment theater to some degree. Both left and right are playing games with the citizens. I really think a lot of it comes to race denial. Establishment right and left have decided to pretend that race doesn’t exist and it just leads to a propaganda war. Within the context of race denial everything becomes muddled and lying becomes the norm.
The terms ‘Left’ and ‘Right’ seem to be describing two approaches to the liberal project.
The former unravels the social order in the name of a supposedly greater economic fairness, the latter poses as the defender of the social order whilst advancing the techno-financial re-write of our economic lives.
Both work toward the same end, the one we find ourselves in right now.
A better approach to me seems to be to frame things in terms of the past and the future. The Right look backwards to tradition and believe that the betterment of humanity lies in some revisiting of old forms of social organisation. The fact that we seem to be moving forward in respect to time and history leads to a kind of pessimism and resignation on the Right. We cannot make the world as it was: noble, culturally deep, green and pleasant, so all we can do is wait for civilisation to collapse into a cyclic return to perennial truths.
The Left meanwhile, are kind of hysterically drunk on progress. Even in my half a lifetime, things have changed beyond recognition and I am typical in not recognising the world I find myself in at middle age. Events these past two years have shown that the ‘Left’ are at the helm of the transhumanist revolution. There is no explicit exploration of what we are progressing towards, no clear outline of what human beings are, where we have come from , why we are here, or where we are going. (Of course one can read what the oligarchic and esoteric versions of these things are).
Left and Right are plagued by materialist thinking. I await a politics which has, as a starting point, a clear philosophical picture of humans and their place in the universe and which looks forward toward creating social forms which enable that to manifest. We are not going back to the divine right of kings. It is hard to imagine tribal and national competition in the age of such weaponry. The scientific age is not going to go away. Yet, materialism as a philosophical basis for our entire knowledge system is on very shaky ground. In fact, intellectually speaking it is already collapsed, only persisting through the enforcement of legacy institutions.
Judaism, of course, is the original religion of materialism.
“whether or not they are ultimately controlled by a Jewish elite, is that both “sides” are dedicated to the promotion of government solutions to social problems caused primarily by government,”
I don’t think you quite get it — as you do rightly note, it doesn’t quite get to the point of things blaming Jew’s. However, you miss the next step — we live in an Oligarchy. Which means there is no real difference between government & it’s Elite controllers (who are indeed Jewish to a statistically ridiculous degree).
The false dichotomy of Left/Right is a reflection of Karl Marx’s notion of a dialectic.
Let’s take a media figure like radio talk show host Dennis Prager, a self-styled conservative, who happens to be a practicing religious Jew, and has authored many books, most recently The Rational Bible (Torah) which is an attempt to desacrilize any religion based on faith rather than Law.
Prager could be seen as a False Prophet and a very adept Leftist Propagandist masquerading as a Conservative. He voices opposition to Leftism everywhere he can, but he always avoids criticizing Jews or Israel.
This is most recently seen in his condemnation of Trans athletes where he frames the issue as one of gender discrimination, following Leftist dialectic. He avoids mentioning the the Trans athlete issue is a cover for advocating for a new class of victims of discrimination who are to be given superior rights. Another example is members of public school boards who happen to be gay, Trans and Jewish, who are immune from public criticism because they have three protected categories. Such people are placed as heads of school boards in order to thwart parental criticism of the adoption of pedophilia learning materials in public schools. But no mention is made that the issue is not really gender discrimination but the creation of yet another class of victims who are given superior rights in return.
Prager also recently wrote an article Who Would Hide a Jew is Nazis Took Over America? Such a title is what lawyers would call pre-conclusionary that no one would hide a Jew from Nazis in America. One could presume that Nazis in America are the fake White Supremicists created a False Dialectic. Prager cunningly avoids mentioning that it is not Jews but Whites who have not been vaccinated who need “hiding” in America.
The only problem with leftism is that it is labeled wrong!
“The market god is a false god. Anarchists are nuts.”
“Capitalism is the fullest expression of anarchism and anarchism is the fullest expression of capitalism.” Murray Rothbard
“The State is, and always has been, the great single enemy of the human race, its liberty, happiness, and progress.” Murray Rothbard
“Regards”, onebornfree
Being in this position is what happens when the interests of an entire nation are deferred to a fanatically cohesive and obsessively self-interested minority group.
Basically, yes. but the thesis statement was contained in the midst of it, rather than at the front. That was:
“More revealing is who these people are. The elite leftists today are almost exclusively either Jews (of political, corporate, or academic stripe) or Gentiles, mostly White, working for and on behalf of Jews.”
Oh, and one other statement?
“It is almost a religious idea, almost like saying we are all “children of God” or something. But that’s nonsense. ”
We are NOT basically good. “For there is none that doeth righteousness, no, not one.”
And some are predestined for Hell. ‘His Blood be upon us, and our children.”
Of course, if you’re reading this, at least know UNZ is being far more honest that MOST…. Jews.
There is an article in Haaretz yesterday (behind paywall):
‘We’ll Lose Some Israeli Votes,’ Nixon Said. ‘But We Kept American Boys Out’
When Israel invaded Egypt 65 years ago, President Eisenhower, up for reelection that week, offered an exceptionally tough response. ‘We will handle our affairs,’ he told a friend, ‘as though we didn’t have a Jew in America
Today it seems to be the other way around: Js. handle American affairs as thought there wasn’t an American in the US.
We are a nation united by Food, Folks, and Fun.
Haha!
At least he “defined” his terms, straight from the dictionary in his head. I’m surprised there were no Wikipedia, or Collier’s, citations.
In any case, there is too much blaming of the Jews. The key to winning is not to insist that your opponents play less well, but to play a better game yourself. The successful tactics of your opponents must also be adopted and revised or refined as necessary, rather than disdained. This is the only healthy path to overcoming the “dominant Judeocracy”. Ethno-Europeans have little to no cohesion. And it is why you lead lives of shame and degradation knowing you are dominated and manipulated by a tiny group of people who do have cohesion. Right now they are the better team. Therefore, start by getting your own shit together.
Well, let me tell this author that I am a south american and a belong to the left.
I dont give a damn whether the light thinkers north of Rio Grande think of left or whether they apply their forur letter words universally to the BLM of or to statue blasters over there.
Our problem is defeating the Right.
And their out-of-border masters
You are fundamentally in error. Most humans are good. Look at any neighborhood. Most humans are moms and dads. They raise their kids, bake cookies for school functions, coach sports teams for kids and pay their taxes. Most humans are decent folks.
Who is not decent is the Christian/Jew god of infanticide and genocide and human sacrifice (the cross). That is the sick entity that is NOT good.
This god gets angry at Pharoah and what does he do? Infanticide! He sends his angels of slaughter to murder the firstborn children of the Egyptians. Who would do that but a sadistic monster.
This ego-freak god demands worship or…. he will sadistically burn and torture you in his hell-fires for all eternity. Only a sadistic monster would create a plan for earth so diabolical.
If you want to find the source of evil look to the Jew/Christian ego-freak god. The Overlord of Hell, the god of infanticide and genocide (telling his Hebs to wipe out the other tribes women and children included). This ego-freak based a religion on human sacrifice and faux cannibalism (eat my flesh, drink my blood) this should give you a clue. Sadly it does not.
The definition of the “Left” is Bolshevism. That is the ultimate expression of leftism. Government enforced egalitarianism, and it always ends in shortages, poverty and tyranny. Human nature being what it is, Bolshevism can’t work, communism can’t work, socialism can’t work. Most humans are lazy, shiftless and self-centered, a miniscule number are selfless, so few that there’s no point counting them. The old tale about the selfless soldier throwing himself on a grenade is false in 99.9999% of the stories. He either slipped, or someone else threw him on the grenade. Leftism has to end in disaster because it goes against human reality.
We know now that leftism and rightism is merely a cover up to the same policies to enslave people, including jews and blacks. Let´s move on.
Certainly Tucker is constrained about what he can say about the JQ.
He is not being helpful, however, when he frames the issue of immigration, legal and illegal, in terms of “voting rights.”
I also find his recurrent appeals to “Doctor Martin Luther King” to be particularly disheartening.
We do not need MLK, or Candace Owens, or a based black guy at a school board meeting, to give us validation.
Thanks for linking your essay on Tucker and his background. I’ve been curious.
Watching his show lately, I find myself gauging how much will actually be true, which is not fun. He and the others only serve to pump the brakes on any type of solution. It’s frustrating to want to fast forward through the same regurgitation and regular annoying guests like Candace Owens as a translator for the black race. Then you hit the commercials and you’re teleported to Israel and filthy, decrepit Jews begging for your lower class income because you’re Christian and it’s tithing.
At some point soon the average person is going to see whites being separated from the Jews. To claim they’re identical through skin color is ludicrous. Reminds me of an effeminate soldier I knew who purchased an Asian island sea bride and then claimed she was also white. As white as he is heterosexual.
These are also the reasons I gave up on most white nationalist websites. Always slowing down momentum because they’d lose their precious website/funding/home if they told the whole truth. It’s also hard to trust men who have married Asians as we have nothing in common unless you’re jewish. The ones who marry their daughters for a second family are also no one to morally elevate. Many spend all day online gossiping and believing the world revolves around them while sharing useless memes and thinking everything will go back to normal.
We’re running out of time and these people aren’t helping.
Hey Gents, this is an interesting topic for which I will craft a (rare) long and involved response later. It deserves it.
Unfortunately that will take time and brain power, and I am going to have to work for at least two hours today to collect my eight-hour salary.
In any event, just to tickle your tastebuds, I would like to direct you to an excellent debate between four (ostensible) white nationalist, successful, seasoned, “Conservatives” that you may have missed. All, one would assume are legal adults. Three take one side of the debate, which could be entitled: “should a white man marry a white woman and have children or not.” The fourth takes the other side of the debate.
I will not ruin this four you further, as it is absolutely brilliant. Please spend a half-hour reading this as, trust me, it is highly edifying in many ways.
The debate basically starts at comment #311. Yours Truly; “Truth” serves as moderator…
https://www.unz.com/aanglin/black-man-rapes-woman-on-public-train-media-complains-people-stood-by-and-watched/#comment-4966709
You on the right site here boy? This here sites all ’bout them evil jews and dumbass niggas.
Whut’s money got to do with it, ‘cept the jews have it all and niggas and the dumbass white whiners on this site don’t.
The Tuck can’t speak freely, so he couched the Great Replacement in less-direct, less-obvious terms. Infuriated Noseberg regardless.
Anarcho-capitalism is even more Jewish than libertarianism – another Kabbalist dream-world mousetrap for smarter White mice.
Humans are social. Every social group is governed. Anarchism, libertarianism and their hyper-individualistic variants require that you deny human nature and the realities of inequality, race and scarcity, among many other realities.
Dalton’s hard truths are very triggering for our thankfully few remaining fantasy politics fans.
No….actually there isn’t enough blaming of the jews.
If jew blaming were mainstream we might actually see some improvement in our position.
Your post is absurd. We are to copy the tactics of the jews?
How?
Can we start our own Federal Reserve to bribe every politician in sight?
Can we start our own media conglomerates to control the minds of the masses?
Can we force politicians to sign a pact that they will ignore Israel and do what is best for America?
You mention that whites have no cohesion. Well duh!
What happens anytime whites try to organize ANYTHING? The answer is that the jews send in the FBI to infiltrate and sabotage any such organization.
Your comment is absurd because you don’t really understand the extent of jewish power or the REASON for jewish power, which is MONEY. They have financial control. They use money as a form of control.
Whites do not have control of the money supply, and that is the main reason that whites do not have any control.
jews disallow ANY cohesive group strategies for whites, period. The jews even used covid to close down our churches!
No….you are blaming the victim here. It’s not as if whites have not been trying to figure out how to fight back. It’s that organized jewry has demonized white people, demoralized white people, instilled guilt in innocent white people, and they’ve made it impossible for whites to display any sort of ingroup preference.
The problem is far worse than you seem to understand. And there is a sinister and malicious element to the issue of the exercise of jewish power….the ability to “cancel” people, close bank accounts, smear whites in the media, send in the FEDS, etc.etc.etc.
Jews work very hard to cripple and damage White society, identity and interests.
Why isn’t it “healthy” to recognize that, call it out and criticize it? There is nothing wrong or weak about blaming Jews for what Jews are doing to us. Pathologizing awareness and criticism of Jewish power only reinforces Jewish power.
You don’t win a political struggle by refusing to identify the opposition and call them out.
Part of “getting our shit together” is emboldening and empowering guys to identify who the other team is, what they are doing and how to counter it.
Focusing only on “ourselves” is an incoherent, self-defeating strategy.
We are facing an enemy with no fear or restraint for naming Whites, opposing Whites and demonizing Whites. A big part of their solidarity and cohesion comes from naming their enemies.
Another angle to consider…………
….ever since the emergence of Jesus 2000 years ago………it always was ………still is…… a war on Christ!
Don’t think so!
Who were His primary persecutors….and still are?
Read it all – https://crushlimbraw.blogspot.com/2021/03/in-essenceit-always-wasand-still-isa.html?m=0 – Christianity should not be confused with Churchianity!
Oh yes, one more thing – Conservatism has turned out to be a total failure.
What other political movement has lost every institution over 100 years? You can read it at – http://www.crushlimbraw.com – history!
If only we could get Tucker Carlson to run for President. He’d destroy Biden or Harris in debates and win by a landslide.
I would add, that the left/right paradigm was killed decades ago.
I have said, for some time, that capitalism and communism are the two sides of the same shekel. Both are about concentrating wealth and control into the hands of the relatively few. It’s all in how you define the commune.
People mistake commercial transactions for capitalism. A commercial transaction doesn’t require cash, credit, or digital currency. It can be trading one commodity for another. The only true capital is a person’s labour and initiative. Everything is built on that.
Anarcho-capitalism is another misnomer. The early socialists/mutualists were anarchists, and saw it as order without power. Capitalism, like communism is raw power. The early socialists/mutualists saw capitalism as the powerful oppressing the weak, and communism as the weak oppressing the strong. They detested Marx and were openly Auntie Shem-itic. That was before it was discovered that not only was Marx working for the Rothschilds, he was related to them.
IMO, the closest thing to a “perfect” political philosophy (there is no perfect political philosophy) is nationalism where any government action is taken on the basis of what is best for the nation as a whole, irrespective of where that solution lies on the obsolete left/right paradigm. That doesn’t translate into big government, sometimes doing nothing would be the best solution.
Organized jewry complaining about whites has evolved into an art form.
Jewish kvetching regarding all things white is the essence of the culture of critique and one of the actual means by which they have demolished our society.
They attack any and all forms of white cohesion, including the family, the father figure, our women, our educational system, our religion, and our nations at large.
This relentless criticism has a caustic effect and results in the demoralization of gentiles, and this demoralization confuses and paralyzes whites.
Fear of being labeled an “anti-semite” or “Nazi” disarms whites, making it impossible for whites to defend themselves.
That’s why naming the jew is such a powerful step…not only because NTJ is the truth, but because the truth empowers white identity by helping whites to see who the real enemy is.
In the mainstream jewish media, the nice jews PROVIDE many different “enemies” depending on a given situation, such as: “The Democrats,” or “The Muslims,” and now even whites themselves as
“Domestic Terrorists.”
You have to sort of admire the kind of guts it takes for the jews to boldy point their fingers at us and call us “terrorists” after they just unleashed mobs of negroes to burn down our cities, used covid to steal our liberty, stole an election, and framed an innocent group of old white people on Jan. 6th.
So….yeah….the goofball above says that we should just imitate what the jews do…..but whites generally operate with a Christian value system that disallows whites to engage in the outright criminality and evil that organized jewry has mastered.
Approx 80% of Republican votes come from whites so that means of the 75 million votes Trump won in 2020 approx 60 million of those were whites. Not sure where Dalton is getting only 50 million unless he’s using the 2016 vote totals.
Or at least pretends to in order to keep feeding at the trough. The problem with Tuck is that he foolishly believes that people on the Jewish led left are persuadable to his 1990’s race blind worldview, but you cannot persuade ideologues. Anti-white racial hatred is now a religion for the majority of the Democrat base.
And then what?
What exactly would a paid script-reader who has never held public office, or run a lemonade stand, do as the POTUS, then?
The problem with “blaming Jews” for everything is that it will lead to just such generalizations where many innocent people will be held accountable for the sins of a few who will more than likely escape unscathed anyway.
It’s already baked into your rhetoric as follows: “Jews work very hard to cripple and damage White society, identity and interests.“. I can’t think of a single Jew I have ever known to be complicit in any such activity.
What needs to happen instead is that certain individuals need to be held accountable and certain institutions dismantled, followed by sensible policies that will prevent the usurpation of national interests by those with questionable loyalties.
But this will only happen if ethno-Europeans develop sufficient cohesion and the will to carry this out in a sane manner. It has to begin there. It won’t happen through some wishful critical mass of Jew blaming. As history has already shown, disaster will likely follow, and the same cycle will begin all over.
And that is my point.
See my response to @Exile.
Cross-thread posting is lame and leads to off-topic rants.
I’m glad you enjoyed that exchange troof but I’m not a conservative nor a White nationalist.
My position is that the government needs to face the reality of race or else there will be eventually be a civil war. I’ve seen what goes on behind the curtain to make the circus to work and the level of corruption is obscene. The level of cheating that exists to obscure racial gaps simply isn’t sustainable. Either the government accepts that humans were not granted a magical evolution exemption and faces reality or we will likely Balkanize and some White nationalist movement could very well develop.
Conservatives often annoy me more than liberals. They are supposed to be the adults in the room and yet still cling to childish fantasies when it comes to race. The typical conservative thinks we can just dress Black kids in cardigans and send them to charter schools with titles like College Prep Academy. They have spent hundreds of millions on this this type of thinking and will call you a racist if you point out how it didn’t work. Bill Gates and Betsy DB together spent about half a billion on charter schools on the assumption that public schools/teachers were to blame. But don’t expect Fox News to report the results as it goes against conservative/libertarian theory where race doesn’t exist and the government must somehow be to blame. Oprah also funded one of these schools and that too was kept out of the media. Can’t have the masses learning about race. Back to establishment friendly narratives of blaming Whites or big government.
Yes! Today it does. People “suffering” with penis envy are not who should be in charge.
Jul 15, 2020 One Party State: Washington Unites To Block Trump Afghan Troop Withdrawal
When it comes to foreign policy and war (among other things) there are not two opposing political parties in Washington.
Video Link
This website alone has abundant examples daily. You are clearly not speaking in good faith.
You are fundamentally in error. Most humans are good. Look at any neighborhood. Most humans are moms and dads. They raise their kids, bake cookies for school functions, coach sports teams for kids and pay their taxes. Most humans are decent folks.
You are fundamentally in isolation.
Visit Detroit and get back to us. You will see lawns with 5ft grass. There is actually a team of White volunteers that go into Detroit to mow the public grounds.
Who is not decent is the Christian/Jew god of infanticide and genocide and human sacrifice (the cross). That is the sick entity that is NOT good.
The Muslim God is even more vengeful and Muslim numbers are expanding. So not buying it. Most Christians aren’t even aware of those Old Testament verses.
When Whites go secular they have fewer children and vote left. That has been true since the 1920s and is backed by statistical data. Marxists know this which is they continue to attack Christianity while giving Islam and Judaism a free pass. Orthodox Judaism expects total submission from the women and leftists in NYC celebrate it as culturally rich.
There isn’t time for a secular movement against the left. Most Whites aren’t capable of leaving both Christianity and liberalism. It’s just too hard for them. I grew up around Nordic Whites and they would rather drink paint than consider the possibility of race existing. Christianity provides Whites with a healthier outlet for their egalitarian genes. When you take away Christianity they go batty and liberalism takes over their mind like a virus. The White guy that gets on Unz in response is statistically irrelevant. I’ve spent a lot of time around secular Whites in the city and the level of groupthink is downright depressing.
While you can’t name any jews that seek to damage white society…..I could certainly make a list that would number in the thousands.
So, it isn’t empty “rhetoric” to blame organized jewry for what we KNOW they are doing.
I agree with this part of your statement:
“What needs to happen instead is that certain individuals need to be held accountable and certain institutions dismantled, followed by sensible policies that will prevent the usurpation of national interests by those with questionable loyalties.”
But we go around in circles when you repeat that ethno-Europeans need to develop sufficient cohesion
(which is patently obvious) but you skip over the fact that JEWS are the impediment to white unity.
My God! They view whites at a Nascar race as anudda shoah! Whites going to church…..genocide! A Trump rally? A HOLOCAUST!
Yes, we are headed for disaster. We are already knee deep in a disaster.
Yes, the “Nazi/jew cycle has repeated at least one hundred times in history. And you’re right that not all jews should be blamed for the sins of the few. BUT…..they have no reservations about spewing blood libel on innocent white people, and blaming us for every ill under the sun.
I disagree that reaching a critical mass of jew blaming won’t alter the situation, because understanding the truth of white dispossession is necessary to instill the call for action.
Getting whites to understand the danger they are in, and WHY this has happened, and WHO is behind it is necessary to form white cohesion.
A vague “well whites better unify” is only half of the equation, and it’s also an exceedingly difficult task.
The problem with leftism is that it’s civilization destroying dogshit peddled by child raping psychopaths.
There. Took a lot fewer words.
Watch me not care. Innocent whites are being brutalized, raped and murdered for being white every single day now, much of it thanks to a certain tribe that pushes the virulent anti-white poison from the government, the media and corpos, some openly drooling for the day we become a minority. When even the American darling Coca-Cola is pushing “be less white”…
My main ire comes from the fact that Whites stood up for the civil rights of others for over a century in this country, and we sacrificed a large chunk of a generation to put down the Nazis (not to mention the Civil War), and what do we get in return? Thundering silence, if not quiet support of the anti-while rhetoric coming down on us like a hailstorm.
We get overrun with swarms of people who don’t give a gnat’s fart if the Constitution even exists anymore. Biden could go on TV and burn the Bill Of Rights live, declaring it null and void, and these people would not give a flipping ship about it. They’d just head back to whatever cartel run cesspit they came from if things got too bad.
So, sorry, but all the Fake Americans can piss off right to Hell.
I take a middle of the road position which is that I don’t deny disproportionate Jewish influence in socialism/government/degenerate media but I don’t think targeting them is a wise strategy. Gays are also disproportionately involved in left-wing activities but nothing will change by simply pointing this out. I think it makes more sense to have a unifying message and not obsess over subdivisions. Secular Whites are also disproportionately left-wing but that is rarely discussed here.
Pointing out Jews and gays in the left doesn’t remove the millions of Nords/Scots/Celts/Germans/Italians that have signed up for the left and know full well it requires lies. That is what needs to be realized. Non-Jewish Whites in left-wing positions are not pawns of Jews or globalists. They believe Whites need to be neutered and undermined for their own good. In their minds it is for the best to turn Europe into Arabia and America into Brazil North. They view their lineage as protected from third world madness through wealth. If you pointed out to them that ‘Jews are involved in x activity at y%’ then they would shrug. Removing Jews wouldn’t change their plans either.
I swear, every damn anti-white article published during Trump’s first term was written by some smarmy looking Jewish guy in his 20s. And, yes, I know they are Jewish because they either put it right in the “about the author”, or click their Twatter link and see it in their bio there, right above their 1500 tweets about the horror of whiteness.
Under another handle, I frequent some conservative sites where they accept me because I’m a “radical trad-right” millennial. I just wanted to raise a family and be a mom, and that’s what I’m doing. But if I dare take note of who is pushing all the anti-white rhetoric, suddenly I’m Ilsa, She-Wolf of the SS.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ilsa,_She_Wolf_of_the_SS
There’s just no nuance. You can’t criticize a certain tribe at all. So you’re right- it’s difficult. There’s a lot of programming to undo, if even can be done.
And I don’t even want violence. I just want to be left alone. It’s why I’m leaning toward a national split or secession. It’s too far gone for anything else. We need a place we can regroup, and build restrictions against the current mess into our Constitution 2.0. If we secede at the county level, well, go look at a blue/red map of the country at the county level. Blue would just be an archipelago of urban centers, and who needs them?
Jewish superlawyers seem to have screwed up.
We are headed for disaster. On that we can agree. The most likely scenario for becoming disentangled from this mess is an internal collapse much like happened in the Soviet Union. But one in which the US breaks up into like-minded autonomous regions. The current economic, cultural, political, etc, insanity is unsustainable.
Moon,
I think you should run for President using what you just stated as your platform.
Those so-called definitions (source not mentioned) of left & right are junk, and are acceptable to somebody who hasn’t lived long enough, never got out of the house much, and clearly has little experience with society. A Jew living all his life on the Jew side of town raised in a typically tightly wound Jew household; a dago who has lived among dagos all his life similarly exposed to rigid dago living standards; a person who died within 10 miles of where they were born but never really felt that they “fit in 100%.” It’s a 7th grade mentality-level issue. Leftie liberalism is a 12 year old’s view of life. And in their case, stuck there for life. I think of it as some form of developmental arrest. Right wing Jesus freaks are of the same ilk. Taught to blame some god for what you’re too damned lazy or incompetent to do, and raised to think that way. “It’s God’s will! Not a me thing.”
Leftists are liberals – they all have (real or sometimes just perceived) “skeletons in the closet.” Every last lickin’ one I know does! (sometimes, you have to get into their underpants to discover exactly what it is) In order to feel less entrapped by those horrible (personal) things, they feel compelled to incessantly try to rearrange (other) people’s way of thinking so that they will eventually be able to de-closet whatever it is about themselves that makes them feel they are either inferior or marginalized. It boils down to basic human instinct. It’s the difference between those who are able to blame themselves for being a “failure” (usually based solely on someone else’s standards) and do something to make themselves more “acceptable,” i.e., those who at least tried to do something with themselves, personally, realized their abilities were somehow in some way, limited, so they reset their own life “goals” to accommodate – versus those who hope and pray that the world will miraculously change to accommodate them. The latter are your “leftists.” Sounds like a religion? Yup. You’re catching on.
Liberals have (for whatever reason – money I suppose) have taken over. A jew raised in a too tightly wound household, a chick who despite years waiting for that clit to grow into a penis, like the one she saw on her naked dad, but pshaw!, never did, a chick who discovered at an early age the ability to get pleasure from stimulating herself (usually by accident; horseback riding is a classic) grows older and realizes being a slut in a motorcycle club is where it’s at, a boy who was born homo and renders his sexual preference his entire identity, a chick who watched her mom get busted in the face because the noodles weren’t cooked enough…etc. There’s where your liberals/lefties come from. And often times it isn’t even things that obvious.
A well adjusted person (generally, one born with a good bowlshit detector) realizes early in life that in order to “fit in” it’s they that have to adjust – not the world adjusting to them. Yes! Liberalism is a religion.
Nicely stated, onebornfree!
LMAO!
J.J, I was laughing at that thread all weekend, that was the funniest thing I have read in months. I cross posted it here because It deals with the topics of the thread; “race realism”, liberals vs conservatives, tradition vs modern thought.
I mean, that fact that three white “Conservatives”, one whom is over 60, would lambaste a fellow “white brother” for being jealous at all the pussy I am getting is hillarious, or maybe it’s just me.
Ive gone back and re-read the responses twice already today, and I laughed like I was reading it the first time.
I agree with you, Andreas. Exile’s “abundant examples” don’t relate to the Jews you’ve known– or I’ve known. They are all Americans first, Jews second, third… or tenth.
Thank you, Thomas Dalton, for a very thoughtful essay.
One significant cultural force that this article fails to address is the US Supreme court. This authoritarian institution has played a pivotal role in reorganizing and transforming life in America, particularly for our nation’s founding stock, European-derived peoples. Indeed, the formerly-dominant status of White America has been eroded by a handful of pivotal Supreme Court rulings, which began after WWII (The Holocaust.)
Among them are:
Shelly v Kraemer, which overturned the right of White Americans to protect their formerly-homogeneous communities by striking down the lawfulness of housing covenants which were “racially restrictive” (designed to conserve White culture.) Ironically, racially-exclusive communities (Chinatown, Kiryas Joel) thrive in America today, but Whites are now legally-required to open their neighborhoods to all.
Brown v. Board of Education imposed racial integration on American classrooms, harming Whites and even Blacks, since the racial academic gap is ultimately unbridgeable.
Grutter v. Bollinger, which recently upheld affirmative action (anti-White discrimination) for the sake of diversity.
Homosexual activists, too, have used–and continue to use–American courts to chip away at the rights of employers to select their workforce.
Various Supreme Court rulings have upheld that the remedy that quotas (involving women, POC, homosexuals, etc.) are necessary to assure minority participation in all facets of American life.
Significantly, Jewish overrepresentation in a variety of important fields never catches the attention of the SCOTUS.
I used to be on Twitter (had a significant following a number of times) and I happened to witness Paul Nehlen’s realtime redpilling on the JQ……this was something to see.
Nehlen is a smart and decent man, an engineer who decided to pursue politics. He ran against Paul Ryan (the super shabbos goy) and lost. I’m sure Ryan had unlimited jewish funding.
Anyway….at some point on Twitter, Nehlen noticed something about the names of all of the anti-whites that were attacking him…..and he actually made spreadsheets for an analysis (his logical engineer’s mind working overtime) and he discovered that 99% of the people spewing anti-white hate and criticism against him were (drumroll) JEWISH.
Once your pattern recognition kicks in (a sign of intelligence) you can no longer deny the existence of jewish influence and jewish supremacy.
Of course our jewish friends in the media made sure that Paul Nehlen was destroyed, labeled a
naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.
A French chef at a fancy restaurant goes into a tantrum over artichokes that were peeled wrong by an 18 year old female sous chef- in- training. He hurls pans at her head and body. She is about 90 pounds and cowers behind the racks, flinching from the blows.
AMERICAN LEFTISTS: Stand in silence, do nothing, avoid eye contact with her. Then go on Twitter and bleat about outrage of misgendering, black reparations and hate speech toward men wearing wigs- essentially blackface. No recognition of the yawning double standard. No sympathy for the in the flesh female being beaten.
FRENCH RIGHT THINKING MALE SOUS CHEF: Hears the commotion, puts out his cigarette, comes in, sees situation and clocks the Chef in the jaw, sending him down to the kitchen floor. Checks on girl, sneers at American leftists, makes a sandwich from the expensive prosciutto for that night’s dinner and gets back to work. Asks girl out. Laughs at Chef’s bruised jaw.
I saw this happen, and nothing sums up Leftist/Right mind think to me more clearly.
‘Everybody can agree that Progress is good and most people are good.’
Rose- colored hogwash.
Progress is a mixed bag, and people are a mixed bag.
The most you can say about people is that they generally keep their urges towards malice and cruelty under control, or at least redirect them, and some of them can limit their capacity for thoughtless negligence. That’s about as much “good” as you can reasonably expect.
As far as people intentionally “doing good,” that’s about the same as Progress — great in small localized doses, manageable in moderation… but the bigger it gets, the more chance it will just lead to more suffering.
Moon nails it:
“Watch me not care. Innocent whites are being brutalized, raped and murdered for being white every single day now, much of it thanks to a certain tribe that pushes the virulent anti-white poison from the government, the media and corpos, some openly drooling for the day we become a minority. When even the American darling Coca-Cola is pushing “be less white”…
My main ire comes from the fact that Whites stood up for the civil rights of others for over a century in this country, and we sacrificed a large chunk of a generation to put down the Nazis (not to mention the Civil War), and what do we get in return? Thundering silence, if not quiet support of the anti-while rhetoric coming down on us like a hailstorm.”
The fact that my father and both of my uncles fought in WWII, and killed Germans to save the ungrateful anti-white jews makes me FURIOUS.
And while it’s true that not all jews are anti-white, the number of pro-white jews is miniscule.
The inescapable fact is that silence from the majority of jews is tacit permission for the jewish elite to continue the demonization of innocent whites, inciting blacks to kill whites, etc.
Try reading the article next time.
Bingo! Henry Ford pointed this out in his book The International Jew published a century ago. Jews control both the neolibs and neocons and their goal is to manufacture wars to distract the people, not just foreign wars but fake domestic wars like race wars, class wars, gender wars. The goal is to get the people fighting among ourselves so we’re too busy to pay attention to what they’re doing, which is to loot the country(and the world) blind via Wall Street and funnel all their wealth to Israel. The economy of Israel is booming like never before. Real estate prices in Tel Aviv are through the roof, food prices are sky high, a casual meal out can easily cost you $100 per person. The country exports little, has no manufacturing and no natural resources, where does all that wealth come from?
Academia is where it all started, especially the Ivy League and especially Harvard. All of Ivy Leagues are now near 25% Jewish, with the exception of Princeton and Dartmouth which are “only” 13% Jew. Jews not only dominate these campuses as students, but also overwhelmingly as administrators and faculty, esp. in the “social sciences”. Our top 5 universities HYPSM all have Jews for president. And whatever the elites do, the rest of academia follows. Whoever controls Harvard controls the country and the Jews know it.
Since the 70’s the neolib Jews who dominate these elite universities have indoctrinated all the journalists, K-PhD teachers, administrators, politicians, lawyers, judges, bankers, management consultants(through MBA school) and now techies and sent them all over the country to indoctrinate/coerce future generations. Anyone who wants a decent job will have to work in one of these industries and drink the Jew Kool Aid. Through Wall Street they control all our businesses so all CEOs and rich businessmen have to kowtow. And of course money buys power so they’ve bought off all our Congress critters on both sides of the aisle.
The GOP has no message these days other than “fight socialism!” or abortion, gun control because the left has successfully turned all their messages toxic: being anti-immigration is now “white supremacist”, being anti-crime is “racist”, being pro-religion or anti-gay is “bigotry”, being anti-Imperialist warmongering is now “isolationist”, even supporting free speech is portrayed as supporting “hate speech”. Then you have the libertarian cucks like Rand Paul who says even though he was banned on Twitter, he supports their right to ban him.
There is no longer left or right. For America to survive, it must be preserved as a white majority nation, and the only way to preserve that is to promote National Socialism – end the endless wars and immigration, reshore our manufacturing. The Jews know this. Which is why they have the (((left))) to relentlessly attack the Nationalism and the (((right))) to relentlessly attack “Socialism”.
The first thing to do to fight back is to dismantle the Education Industrial Complex, homeschool our kids, eschew the elite universities and college degree altogether. Learn your coding, business and trade skills in community college or through online certification. Move to small towns, go into farming, ranching, start your own business, and I don’t mean a startup that makes yet another useless app, I mean to start businesses and make and sell things that can be dropped on one’s toes.
The problem with Leftism is Jews control the media and every other important institution.
The “left” these days is 100% reactive and has no guiding philosophy. If the majority of people like Trump, then the “left” hates him, what he says and does makes no difference. If the majority believe freedom of speech is important the “left” is against it. If people doubt the right of the government to mandate vaccination the “left” believe it is essential.
30 years go the “left” held the opposite position of the one they hold today on most social and economic issues.
Ps. What they call the “left” is actually fascism.
I don’t need to read this article to know what’s wrong with The Left. What’s wrong is the FICTION that there is a thing called The Collective which knows best what is best for The Individual. In reality there are only individuals, each working out his destiny to the best of his ability. Left alone these individuals make a society. Not perfect! But good. Good enough. Held under by The Collective (which is merely THE WILL of a tiny number of leftists) almost all these same individuals have a VERY ROUGH GO OF IT.
The Left does have a guiding philosophy: punish the normals.
Not everyone who can’t fit in turns into a lefty. I can’t fit in. And before you make assumptions it’s not because I’m superior in some way, quite the contrary, I can barely manage the basics. But I haven’t turned that into a need to “change the world.”
There are millions of unhappy unfulfilled (I assume, no way to prove it other than the general ash grey run of humanity) who don’t join the control freak bandwagon. They just suck it up…more or less.
I know some blacks who’ve never committed a violent crime or a murder so does that mean blacks don’t commit 55% of all homicides and aren’t disproportionately committing other violent crimes?
dennis should be asking “who would hide a white Christian Russian if the bolshevik jews took over Russia?”
just look at that jewess from Pfizer who was confronted by a reporter from Veritas
why do you think she ran?
Tucker’s done a lot of great things. Much more so than anyone on TV, but that doesn’t mean he’s above a little criticism from time to time. Case in point was his mealy mouthed, milquetoast criticism of CRT where he described it as “punishing people for how they look” but that doesn’t tell the audience anything and suggests that all races are taking it on the chin equally.
But CRT is viciously anti-white and pro non-white, so it’s only whites getting demonized and dehumanized. There was a lot of blowback on social media and the internet over his unwillingness to say that CRT was anti-white. Apparently it worked because now he regularly says that CRT is anti-white.
“A constant theme of right-wing and conservative commentators is that the Left dominates America today. This holds true across nearly the entire spectrum of conservatism, from the dissident- and alt-Right to conventional Republicans, to Pat Buchanan, to Fox News, to the Wall Street Journal, to the pro-Trump crowd. In fact, it’s about the only thing they all agree on.”
The thing that “conservatives” seem to agree most about (along with the left,) is that ‘racism’ is The Worst Thing In The World, and that ‘anti-racism’ supersedes liberty.
“It’s not real Communism” – yes it is.
The judeo-masonic conspiracy theory of history is the correct explanation.
There is no Left or Right. These are made up arbitrary and conveniently changing terms used to create confusion and division.
Do Amish vote?
https://amishamerica.com/do-amish-vote/
I was late to understanding, but now that I see, I can’t unsee.
So, when I read this news item, I looked for the last name of the person who approved this decision.
Levy.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10123557/White-volunteers-fired-Chicago-museum-people-color-hired-job.html
Yep, ain’t nuthin’ like a good ol’ fake wrasslin’ match to distract the masses. Fake wrasslin’ is the new opiate of the masses.
Allright, so here it is, I know that all of my students have been waiting with bated breath:
Ambitious article, Mr. Dalton. You do a fairly good job of describing what the left is, but I do not think you understand what the right is. The word conservative, obviously is one that seeks to conserve, but what these people attempt to conserve slipped by you, I’m afraid.
Your dictionary definition:
Your personal definition:
A true Right, composed of true conservatives, would do the following:
Sort of like a three-legged stool, Old Sport as It wouldn’t create a sturdy enough base for your average conservative’s ample behind.
So what is it that those who came not long after our founding fathers desired to conserve? Why, the word of God. The true God of Abraham, Isaac and Joseph. Understand, the First Ammendment guarantees religious freedom, or so it is interpreted today. Not so fast; what the first ammendment was written to guarantee is denominational freedom.
Years ago when our government was established, there were no Hindoos, Muslims or any of that, per say, basically there were no Catholics, and Athiests were rare (there were and still are Deists, but that’s another story). So the First Ammendment was written to guarantee your rights to worship The Father, accept The Son, and listen to the Holy Ghost any way you desired, Anglican, Presbyterian, Baptist, etc…
Allow me to sidetrack for a second. A few years ago I was working as a military contractor and after a week of ridiculousness, I was ready to board a flight to the Middle East. I spoke to a retired Full-Bird Col. (high military rank). Who was trying to decide whether to vote for Donald Trump or Rand Paul. He was a “Conservative leaning Libertarian”, as he followed his 30 years military career, in which he would receive money for the rest of his life, with more time on the governmnet teat…
This stuck in my head two years later when all the Trump foolishness was at its apex. I watched tape after tape of demonstrations by the left and counter demonstrations by the right, and I noticed a conservative type; white, over 35, wearing as much Harley Davidson gear as the law would allow. These people generally worked in one of three endeavors;
1- Ex military/policeman/fireman
2- Trade Unionist
3-Large multinational unionist, such as the UAW.
That’s right, they were basically all Commies!
All of this bluster about people who don’t want to work for a living, when they retired, at 41 and will get paid forever.
Every conservative it seems, drives an F-150 instead of a “pussy” sedan, and has a Harley Davidson. That is pretty much what the movement stands for.
Take a look at our last conservative hero, the Great Donald. You tell me, what was conservative about him? his three wives? his foul-mouthed speech? His making a living in gambling, his strange comments about his daughter?
The guy was FAR more liberal than Barry was. But he was the conservative hero.
So men here would describe themselves as far more often conservative than liberal. What do they have in common?
Probably #2 of your definition, read: They hate niggers.
Other than that what else?
What is your feeling about Mexicans?
What is your feeling about Jews?
How do you feel about white men misceginating with Asians?
How do you feel about unions?
Should we honor our treaty and protect Taiwan?
Should drugs be legal?
You see, you have exactly ONE thing in common, and a pretty fair number of liberals have that in common with you anyway. That is why your rules for establishment of a Conservative nation will not work.
On the other hand, if you use the 66 books of the bible as a basis for conservatism, well, there is some groundwork that can be established. It’s timeless and universal. From the way the word is supposed to be, there are no Athiest, Jewish, or Muslim, “conservatives.” because the thing they would be conserving is their destruction. Peter Hitchens and Joe Liberman; HOHOHOHO!
So your definition, your cohort and your movement are all dirt; DOA before they hit the ambalamps doors.
Arguably the most misunderstood word in the dictionary is “satan.” What it means in archaic Hebrew is, “adversary.” That’s it. Your television is a “satan”, as is this website, your cellphone, and the education system. They are all adversaries: to God’s word.
And you know what else is an adversary, the old red, white, and blue, because it is a false idol, and pledging allegiance to it is removing allegiance from God. A movement built upon something it is supposed to stand for, is a fools mission that will fail.
You have my permission to reprint this essay in American Conservative, The Paris Review, Smithsonian or anywhere else.
The whole thing is a matter of basic differences in personality types, the two most basic types that have evolved within our social primate species because both are beneficial to its survival and power growth, the basic needs of lifeforms…A good balance, or at least a tit-for-tat cyclical back-n-forth swing, is necessary for a healthy society. Nature, via the process of evolutionary development, says that we need both types.
The Left (aka Liberals) are the status quo changers. Some are driven by a sincere desire to make things better. They have on average a lower need for stability-security and a higher tolerance for new-unusual experiences with a lower desire for cleanliness-orderliness-good hygiene. . Some are driven by a desire to change for the sake of change. Some are foxes who couldn’t reach the grapes, driven by disappointment-frustration with the status quo, and often times they vent this frustration on issues not at all related to their own personal experience. Some may be seeking to become heroes who changed the world. They are often among the non-elites, seeking a way to improve their status and believing that systemic change is necessary for that to happen..
The Right (aka conservatives) are the status quo keepers, and even sometimes the change reversers. They are driven to support the status quo power structure in which they find their life success and sense of stability. They prefer stability and don’t want to fix anything unless it’s broken. Psychological research also shows that they tend to be highly aversive to new-different experiences and have a stronger desire for cleanliness-orderliness-good hygiene. They are often among the elites in the status quo, not wanting to lose their status, but they may also be non-elites wanting to reverse changes that hurt them-reduced their status, or to prevent changes they think might hurt them.
There are also many people who may be kind of an admixture of the two basic types, appearing liberal at times and conservative at times.
Then there are the players, the politicians, the conmen: those who play on the frustrations of the non-elites to promote either change or status quo/reversals in order to gain personal power…They are on both sides of the spectrum depending on which group they seek to play…Trump, Biden, etc. Since they are players it’s sometimes hard to guess whether they are of one type or another.
True liberals, like libertarians, are very laissez-faire type people, nonauthoritarian or interventionist. You go your way and I will go mine. That does not mesh with modern(a?) agenda-centric ‘liberalism’. To wit, and in effect, the democratic party has been taken over by people with Big Plans, no respect for rights or privacy and who will gladly micromanage every little aspect of your life, and they have a spy agency, too. long with hired henchmen. Epstien didn’t kill himself. These people are liars, they are power hungry, and they have killed before. And they will do so again. Today’s democratic party has become a criminal entity.
As to the maddening spectacle of hang-fire Republicans like Gowdy, Barr, Ryan, Boehner, Trump, Graham, Cheney, Limbaugh, Collins, Romney, etc. see this superb article: https://amgreatness.com/2021/10/24/what-good-is-a-republican-victory/ .
It doesn’t focus exactly on this dramatis personae but it calls out the brand for its worthless oxygen thievery.
Jordan, I think, was calling for DOJ documents to be released to the House committee. This would have helped Trump immensely and by golly that was the way to go Trump stated or implied. But somehow being president and directly embarrassing his enemies was just not enough to get those docs declassified and into friendly hands. Talk about an impossible task!!
And Trump pulled his punches on the border. Art. IV, Sect. 4 authorized him to repel invasion but he insisted on speaking of his powers only being those available under statutes pertaining to emergencies. I don’t remember that he ever dispatched more than an Army clerk typist, if that, to support the Border Patrol or promised pardons every 24 hours for bureaucrats who defied the Anti-Deficiency Act to fund whatever it took to get combat power to the border, even assuming that was necessary. God only knows what his WH counsel advised him but I’ll wager all he ever was was a smokescreen for paralysis and feebleness.
So you stand for nothing and just oppose the right? That is an exciting plan for your country.
How large are human social groups?
There is no such thing as “unrestrained free-market capitalism.” There has never been a modern period where people engaged in productive activities could do so free of laws against fraud, arson, theft, extortion, trade libel, or monopoly. And one of the indicators of a healthy free-market economy is fair enforcement of contracts by the courts.
The notion that in recent times there’s been anything remotely resembling UFMC is laughable given the over regulation and taxation of business.
And note that the failure of the sovereign to stop the abuse, such as we see with unrestrained monopoly and wholesale importation of foreign job thieves who also drive down wages, is a political failure not a failure of “Capitalism.” Cancer is not what defines the human body.
It’s so crazy you know to have as a basis for ones philosophy the ideas of “live & let live” and NAP. Yeah so crazy!
You seem to take Tucker at his word. Funny, I don’t think the left does and it’s one reason why they are so hysterical about him, they seem to think he only goes as far as he can get away with which is necessary. Better to tell the 74 million Trump voters half the truth than to publish a column read by just 7400? How do you disseminate the truth of who the elite are and the ethnic motivation behind them to the masses? That’s the real trick, and it has to be short and concise because most people will self censor and stop listening once they hear the J word.
Hi KenH,
I thought that Tucker made clear in the first place that CRT is anti-white. But, if he felt compelled to toughen his stance against it due to social media blowback, that’s all for the good. It shows he listens to his audience, and is not afraid to adjust his positions.
Contrast that with senile Biden, who has doubled down in demanding that nearly everyone (except illegal aliens) must take the shot or get fired. Our so-called pro-labor, pro-union president is anything but. If Biden listened to the people, he would have backed off on his illegal mandates instead of issuing more dictatorial decrees. Now he is more afraid of losing face, (Oops, too late for that).
It sickens me that CEOs are still listening to his ravings, instead of showing loyalty to their workers, who have made them insanely rich. In a healthy country they would have ignored this idiot and worked to bounce him out of office. Instead they stick to their destructive woke ideology. I hope to hell that a Day of Reckoning is coming (soon).
Neuromancer, would you feel the same way about Candace Owens if she was white?
Why not accept Leftists at their word? Their core value is equitarianism. This is a minority position in all cultures except for Western Jews where this value seems to be accepted by about 65 – 70% of them. Combined with their intelligence (especially verbal intelligence), which puts them in positions of power, this is why 99% of the Jews we hear about are equitarians. But not all are.
Back to Leftists, many are just driven by compassion and don’t have a clear understanding of where their equitarianism will lead (destruction of all advanced civilization). They are the fools who will moan when they see the results of putting ideological equitarians in charge of everything.
The Jewish Civil War is many faceted. Religious versus secular. Zionazi chauvinism and racism against Diaspora and Israeli humanism and universalism. Talmudic Jews against secular, and against each other, with numerous factions mutually loathful. Jewish economic parasites against Jewish socialists and anti-capitalists of various hues. Just look at Israeli politics, and the hatreds there. Pretty much like most collectives, but more extreme in their love of contention and incapacity to seek harmony with others, or forgive and forget. ‘Turn the other cheek’? No chance.
They are ‘liberalism for me, punishment for you’ types. Liberalism was always about economic power and its free exercise, not the brotherhood of Man.
I agree that there are plainly hidden cabals exercising power through economic heft, but I cannot agree that they control history. The masses are not impotent, just very heavily brainwashed and downtrodden.
Meh. Cabal would assassinate me the moment I signed the first form or whatever kicks off a campaign.
Anyway, not old enough to run until 2028, and there won’t be an America left by then.
NO Jews on the Right? Pull the other one. The majority, probably a large one, of Jews is highly ambitious and possesses great reserves of drive, narcissism and entitlement. Too much, I would say, when married with nepotism and entryism, for anybody’s good.
I’d ask for sexual blackmail, but keep the kiddies out of it.
Mulga, 65% of Jews vote Dem and Dem means Leftist today.
And Repug means Leftist today too, so… Hey, look at that!
Right? Me too!
OTOH we are taking their word for it..
I’m like you – pretty far from “normal” (I’m not in the least heterosexual – never have been) but was put on a world where 97% of people (and almost all animals) are outwardly heterosexual, and outwardly live that way. Ironically, I’m old enough to know that the not “100% hetero” thing was not so much of a problem (about 15% of men have significant bi-sexual tendencies – hetero married or not, makes no difference) in the “olden days” (pre-hippie, pre-women’s lib, pre-high porno TV days) men did what they wanted to do, and nobody with any sense outwardly wore their sexual preference on their shoulder like a Masonic ring or a cross on a chain. It simply was nobody’s effing business except for that specific person time & (private) place. And socially, nobody was any worse for the wear. That’s difficult for most people today to grasp in this now dopey, tell-all society, accept everybody at par, where even a retard must be described in some “genius” terms in the obits, and the “partnered” gay couple is more accepted in a stuffy suburban neighborhood than an unmarried (not otherwise specified) normal looking single male.
I sensed very early on that I liked boys more than girls. But far as I recall, I didn’t act out anything different than the other boys (except for that one time, 1st grade, for some unknown reason (a sporadic hormone spike?) I kissed the boy sitting next to me – I don’t know, I liked the kid, and far as I can recall, maybe he smelled good(?) or something. The reaction of that teacher to that impulsive incident taught me to abandon such impulsive behavior, which I promptly did – I was only 6 but I knew damned well what embarrassment was).
And despite my deeply planted homosexual tendency, I never bought into this gay lib shit – in fact, I realized somebody somewhere (some effeminate homo hippie I suppose) simply replaced the word “fairy” with “gay” as if that was supposed to somehow “normalize” guys like me. Heh. Did just the opposite! Past 30 years old, not (hetero) married, I faced discrimination in employment and way more questioning than ever! Lot of good that bowlshit did.
More impressive to me than anything, us kids were raised to “shift for ourselves.” We had the talk – at about 12 years old…not sex ed, but instead, something to the effect of “you want to have a life at a certain level?” it’s your responsibility we’re leaving youze kids nothing. We all proceeded from there busted our asses as needed, and were no worse for the wear.
A game requires rules.. the Termite Tribe honors no rules, except ‘is it good for jews?’ We would have to lie, cheat, steal, seduce, bribe/buy, act with extreme prejudice, murder, genocide, terrorize, etc. if it would benefit ‘Whites’. Do ‘we’ have the stomach for it? Better to use the historical reaction – expulsion, now that they have a country to ‘return’ to.