The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Anastasia Katz Archive
The Ordeal of Sincere White Liberalism, Part I
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
List of Bookmarks

Matthew Pratt Guterl, Skinfolk: A Memoir, Liveright, 2023, 320 pages

In his memoir, Skinfolk, Matthew Pratt Guterl describes growing up as a white boy with four non-white adopted siblings. Mr. Guterl was raised in a small town in New Jersey in the 1970s and 1980s, with one white biological brother and four adoptees. His parents were well-educated, environmentally conscious liberals who wanted to have a “family of the future” that would be living proof that integration works. The author grew up believing he was part of a family with a unique purpose, and the word “us” had a special meaning.

In his memoir, Mr. Guterl refers to his parents by their first names, Bob and Sheryl, and to his siblings by childhood nicknames. Bob was a tall, dark-haired man who began as a lawyer and later became a state judge. Sheryl was a blonde, blued-eyed teacher. Matthew Guterl was born in 1970, so he was 53 when this book was published. He has his mother’s fair coloring.

The family lived in a house with a white picket fence, across from a general store, where shoppers often cast curious eyes on the multiracial children playing in the yard. Bob wanted the family to have a traditional, all-American house, so he spent a lot of time maintaining the picket fence, even though a more modern fence would have been less work.

The author — whom I will henceforth call Matt to distinguish him from his father — gets off to a slow start but once the adoptions begin, the memoir becomes a fascinating account of the racially self-destructive mindset of liberal whites.

Matt grew up listening to his father tell the story of Noah’s Ark and likening their family to it. Instead of two animals of each kind, they have two children of each race. “Early on, I am taught to see the house with the white picket fence as a biblical ark for the age of the nuclear bomb, of race riots, of war.”

Years later, when Matt was grown, Bob said he had wanted “two of every race” but had forgotten to “collect two Native Americans to complete the matched sets he had assembled.”

The inspiration

When Matt Guterl was a baby in 1971, The Population Bomb by Paul Ehrlich had a huge influence on his parents. It pushed for Zero Population Growth, which was trendy in the early 1970s. Matt writes that he now thinks it was “a wily bit of pop-science scare-mongering,” but Sheryl believed Zero Population Growth “made sense” and likened it to recycling. She wrote on her first adoption application that she was chair of her township’s recycling committee. Bob grew up in a large, Irish Catholic family and wanted a big family. Adoption was therefore a way not to be “wasteful.” Matt says his parents wanted “to make a political statement.”

Bob and Sheryl were also influenced by “Why We Adopted an Interracial Child” in the May 1971 issue of Family Circle. It was written by Jim Bouton, a retired New York Yankees pitcher, who adopted a Korean boy. Bouton wrote: “The Zero Population Growth people have the right idea. I don’t think we have the right to litter up the world with our offspring.”

Bouton argued for a tax reduction for families who adopt two or more children and for free vasectomies. Bob said similar things to his son Matt. The Boutons had “seriously thought” about adopting a black child, but “just didn’t have the courage” because they worried that a black child would be torn between “the Negro community” and the WASP world. They were afraid a black child would reject them when he grew up.

Adoptions from Asia

Bob and Sheryl Guterl had the courage the Boutons lacked, but their first adopted son was from Korea. They contacted Welcome House, the agency the Boutons had used. Welcome House was founded in 1949 by Pearl S. Buck, the novelist famous for The Good Earth, as an alternative to traditional adoption agencies that placed children with parents of the same race. Welcome House was looking for homes for Korean and American Indian children and asked if the Guterls had a “coloring preference.” Sheryl wrote “none.”

Bob and Sheryl adopted an infant Korean child in 1972. Matt was born in 1970 so he has no memory of life before that. He refers to this brother as “Bug” — “a nickname so old that it has no genesis that we can recall.” When Bob and Sheryl went to JFK airport to collect their new son, all of the other couples waiting for the plane of Korean orphans were white.

Sheryl at the airport holding Bug.
Sheryl at the airport holding Bug.

After adopting Bug, Bob and Sheryl became “model adoptive parents” at Welcome House where they led parent workshops on international adoption. They inspired another relative to adopt, so Matt had a cousin who was also from Korea.

One year later, in 1973, Sheryl gave birth to a boy named Mark. That would be a white full brother, but Matt writes practically nothing about him for the rest of the book. Did he dislike Mark? Did he want to concentrate only on interracial adoption? The reader can’t tell.

When Matt was five years old, his parents told the children they would be getting another brother. It was a dark conversation about refugees, war, and a flight across the Pacific. “Bear” was a biracial black and Vietnamese boy whose father was a soldier stationed in Vietnam. Bear’s biological mother, Tran Thi Thung, had three children, all fathered by different black soldiers. Matt avoided writing plainly that Miss Thung was a prostitute: “She did what she had to do to make money, serving as a serial secret wife for GIs.”

Miss Thung said in an interview with the New York Times in 1974 that she placed her three children in an orphanage because of poverty and the animosity toward biracial children. “No Vietnamese man will take three black kids,” she said. As an adult, Bear said he still remembered the “death stares” he got in Vietnam. He was sure the Vietnamese wanted to kill him.

When each adopted child was first brought home, the family threw a “Welcome Home” party. At Bear’s party, Matt gave his new brother his bicycle as a “welcoming gift,” but only to please his parents. He wrote that he had a “deep reservoir of anxiety and stress, a desire to overperform welcome and generosity.” He tried to “snuff out” doubts about the adoption and felt the white guilt his father instilled in him.

Matt and Bear were only days apart in age and eventually became very close, but five-year-old Bear’s arrival was hard for Matt. He went back to baby talk, and sometimes did not talk at all. Many children revert to baby talk when a new sibling is brought home; it is a cry for attention. Sheryl had a moment of regret when Matt’s speech regressed, wondering, “What have we done?”

When Matt and Bear were seven, Bob and Sheryl visited the family who adopted Peter, Bear’s older half-black, half-Vietnamese half-brother. Bear immediately clung to his biological brother, leaving Matt feeling cast aside.

Matt always compared himself unfavorably to his adopted “twin:” “In every single way, he is physically superior to me. The coaches elevate Bear to the traveling baseball teams, which compete statewide. I stop playing sports soon after. . . . I watch from the sidelines as he wins trophies.”

They got after-school jobs delivering papers. “It takes me longer to deliver the papers. Bear hurls himself around town, sailing in the air after hitting a small bump, cutting over lawns and corners. I ride in straight lines, avoiding the mud, the puddles, the slippery gravel. It takes me much longer because I am so much more vigilant and so much more reserved.” Bear was also a good student.

Bob and Sheryl adopted Anna in 1977, when Matt was seven and she was thirteen. “Anna materializes in our midst with an explosion of brightly colored silk, bringing several beautiful traditional Korean dresses.” Matt described her — half-white, half Korean — as “Heartbroken, having lost everything she has ever known.” Anna arrived knowing some English, and she begged her adoptive parents to find Korean things in New Jersey. Bob and Sheryl took her to Korean-language Catholic masses and to Korean grocery stores. The family learned to eat with chopsticks. Sheryl recalled: “She missed her culture. We did what we could. It would be so much easier now.” In 1977, there were approximately 30,000 Koreans living in the United States. By 2021, the number was two million.

Anna was older and left home more often than her four adopted brothers. She went on dates and got a job. Her Japanese bosses made anti-Korean comments. When she shopped at the Korean grocery, the Korean ladies referred to Anna with slurs because she was biracial.

The n-word

The family went on a camping trip in Virginia, and Bob and Sheryl were disturbed to find that black campers were segregated from whites. When the Guterl boys played with white children, the whites referred to Bear as “boy,” even after being told his name. Bob and Sheryl decided to go north for vacations after that, but in New Hampshire, Matt had a much more unpleasant encounter. Bear was noticed as soon as they arrived. Alert to “the racial electricity,” Bear stayed close to his parents, but Matt went bike riding alone.

A group of white boys who had seen the family chased him, shouting, “N—! Get the n—!” They surrounded him, and one boy said, “You’re the n—’s brother.” Another said, “Get him out of town.” Matt, badly frightened, broke through the circle and rode away. He realized that the boys saw his brother only as black, not half-Asian. He thought the boys let him go because he was white, and would have beaten up Bear.

The parents of the boys who chased Matt apologized to him. Matt didn’t think he deserved the apology, even though he was the one who was chased. He thought they should apologize to Bear. “White people apologize to me . . . because I am white like them, and because I represent an integrated future in which white people still play a meaningful role.”

Bob and Sheryl stopped vacationing in Virginia because of racism, but they lived in a majority-white town in New Jersey, and did not take their children to black areas. Young Matt met large numbers of non-whites only at Welcome House picnics.

As the first-born, Matt should have had a special role in the family, but Bear instantly became the older brother, and Anna was years older. Matt’s role became that of representing whites. He wrote that being “the white child” was his “function in the family,” but because he was always with Bear, white children saw him as black.

Matt and Bear
Matt and Bear

Matt had thick lips and classmates called him “N— Lips.” In the seventh grade, the bullying was so bad that his parents took him to a plastic surgeon to reduce his lips. While healing from the painful surgery over the summer, Matt fantasized about how his classmates would see him as his “defining role,” the white kid, when he went back to school. They kept calling him “N— Lips” anyway, and Matt was “instantly deflated, so inconsolable. . . . Blackness has attached itself to me.”

This was a big burden for a 12-year-old — rejected both for his appearance and because his adopted brother was black. He was also disappointed in himself for not fulfilling his role as a representative of whiteness. He believed his family was on a mission to change the world by example, but it didn’t seem to be working. “That nickname . . . is another reminder . . . of the naivete of our family’s progressive narrative. Not everyone, I realize, has heard Bob’s kitchen-table sermons about the global catastrophe around the corner, about the glorious future predicated on our rainbow tribe.”

A family built for virtue signaling

Young Matt didn’t like the constant gaze of onlookers as his parents showed off their diverse family: A hundred pairs of eyes on us every day.” His parents’ decision to create a multi-racial family meant the children were like celebrities, always aware they were being watched and judged.

Matt had fond memories of playing with his brothers and sister in their backyard, because the neighbors couldn’t see them. The family continued to vacation in New Hampshire, and returned every year to a secluded lakeside cabin: What I remember most about this place is the absence of any sight lines, of any watchers, of any gaze.”

The family would arrive in church “like a walking and breathing rainbow, a Benetton advertisement brought to life.” They switched churches a few times but the children were always doted on. Matt, Bug, and Bear always played the three wise men in Christmas pageants. “Having us carry the gifts up the center aisle, in our cheap Woolworth’s beards and our flowing robes, sends a powerful message to a new parish, formed at the far edge of white flight . . . that if the future is going to be confusingly diverse, it will at least still be Christian.”

Ancestry and white guilt

Sheryl was a descendant of William Pratt, a founder of Hartford, Connecticut. She took the family on a trip to Old Saybrook, Connecticut, which has a monument to William Pratt. Sheryl was proud to find streets named after him. A guide gave them a tour, telling the heroic history of Old Saybrook’s early settlement, but Sheryl’s white guilt set in when the guide told them that William Pratt led troops in the Pequot War. He fought in The Battle of Mistick Fort, in which 90 English and 100 allies (Narragansett, Mohegan, Niantic and Connecticut River Indians) killed more than 400 Pequot in an attack on a fortified Pequot village. Pratt received one hundred acres of land; his descendant Sheryl was horrified.

Matt says she sat “with the enormity of this tale . . . Those streets, those statues . . . are all honoring her ancestor for the merciless Battle of Mistick Fort, for the burning alive of men, women, and children.” It did not matter that Pequot warriors started the war by slaughtering unarmed whites, or that the 100 Indians allies were happy to kill Pequots.

Matt’s father, Bob, had an “interest in finding some obscure, random ancestor, some genetic flourish that will enrich what he sees as an otherwise all-white background.” On the application for his first adopted child, Bob claimed he had some American Indian ancestry. Apparently, there was a family rumor of a French-Canadian grandmother who was part Indian. Matt wondered if this “reckless reference to an Indigenous heritage” made it easier for him to adopt non-white children. He was disgusted that his father falsely claimed to be part Indian, not that his father didn’t think his own background was “rich” enough.

Matt took a DNA test. There was zero Indian ancestry.

Adoption leads to immigration

When Bear was in the eighth grade, his biological mother sent a letter to Sheryl, pleading to let her communicate with her son and asking for money. Miss Thung also asked Sheryl to convince Bear’s other half-siblings, Peter and Amy, to write to her. When Bear finished college, he and his half-brother brought Miss Thung to the United States and Bear helped her get American citizenship.

The adoption from the Bronx

When Bob and Sheryl decided to adopt a sixth child during the summer of 1984, they convinced 14-year-old Matt he was part of the decision. His parents held a family meeting, at which Matt recalled, “We discuss[ed] our aims and ambitions,” as though bringing another child into the family was his own ambition. Matt thought there was an unlimited capacity for more. He was a true believer in his parents’ mission; every human problem could be solved by immigrants assimilating into the “white heterotopia of the American small town, the American suburb, and the American family.”

His parents discussed adopting a non-white disabled child, and the five children they already had responded by saying they didn’t want a sibling with visible and disfiguring scars, a reaction Sheryl thought was “terrible.” Matt, however, liked the idea of being big brother to a crippled little sister: “I imagine a sister named Amy from India, a young girl with leg braces, someone smaller and younger, who I will carry up and down the steps.”

Bob decided that he wanted another black child, to turn Bear into a matched set. He and Sheryl showed their children a photo of a little black boy named Eddie, whom Matt thought looked like Webster, the main character in a sitcom about a white couple that adopts a black child. Matt got used to the idea and he even bragged to a girl he liked that his family would be adopting a boy from the Bronx, which sounded exotic.

Eddie
Eddie

Matt recalled that in the 1980s there were stories on the news about “crack babies.” He remembered diagrams of crack-damaged brains shown on TV. The adoption agencies told prospective parents like Bob and Sheryl that crack babies were “disabled.” Eddie, the boy they chose to adopt, was a crack baby. Matt thinks it was unfair to stigmatize children of crack-addicted black mothers; he believes society saw blackness itself as a disability.

The adoption agency played on Bob and Sheryl’s desire to be saviors, telling them that if Eddie stayed in the projects, he would not live to be 30, although they did not explain why. “When we are told that he will die without us, we believe it.”

There was a presumption that living in “all-white, small-town America” would save Eddie “from a horrible fate in the dystopian city . . . . We believe, mistakenly, that we are magic.”

Interviewing his mother for his memoir, Matt asked Sheryl if she had any “warm, treasured memories with Eddie.” She replied, “It was difficult from the start.”

The day Eddie came home, the family had its typical Welcome Home party, but just as it started, Eddie grabbed “our Aunt Joan’s” purse and made “a dash for the end of the driveway.” Bear caught him and told him he didn’t have to steal anymore. Eddie was six years old.

To be continued.

(Republished from American Renaissance by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 27 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. ” In the seventh grade, the bullying was so bad that his parents took him to a plastic surgeon to reduce his lips. While healing from the painful surgery over the summer”–That’s just awful! What hypocrites! The way to handle that is, tell your kid to tell the bullies to FUCK OFF!

    • Agree: Pop Warner
  2. Angharad says:

    OMG WHY are my people SO crazy?

    • Agree: Adolf Smith
    • Replies: @Wokechoke
  3. The framing is partial & biased. From the sounds of it, they were well off & kind souls. America is a 1st rate country. During Greek/Roman times, Empire afforded luxury, time, renaissance. America is no exception.

    Adopting someone else’s child or children is traumatic enough. Add to it, race. Not only is this detrimental to the child.. but more often than not, the adopting family as well.

    Children should be left in their natural environment.

    Framing as ‘white guilt’ is biased. They were kind people. They may have been naive. Considering, at that time, US was slaughtering Vietnam – a country of poor peasant farmers. GIs were known as baby killers. Maybe this had an impact?

    US is a violent nation. ie. since 1st Gulf War, US has killed at least 1.6 million Iraqi babies.

    Americans need introspection.

    • Replies: @GringoLoco
  4. Wokechoke says:

    What a completely fucking insane thing to do to your own son.

    • Agree: silviosilver
  5. Wokechoke says:
    @Angharad

    There’s the second installment to enjoy too.

    “Bear” appears to have been a somewhat lucky anomaly for the parents. Basically ruined the son’s life but the second black adoptee? What could go wrong…

    • Replies: @Truth
  6. Pastit says:

    Sick, mentally ill people believing their own kids were not as good as non-whites. Typical clueless liberals attempting to solve the worlds problems through interracial adoption. What a sick life to have grown up in.

  7. Truth says:
    @Wokechoke

    Nah, the son was just a born wimp.

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
  8. Lip reduction surgery? If the bullies had said his feet were too big, would his “parents” have cut off his toes?

    • Replies: @Truth
    , @G. Poulin
  9. Truth says:
    @Lucky Jackson

    You would want to be born with nigger-lips?

    • LOL: Adam Smith
  10. Wokechoke says:
    @Truth

    Forced to put up with delusional sadistic parents who adopted half the planet.

    • Replies: @Truth
  11. Why would parents of 2 children then adopt 4 more children even of the same race as themselves?
    The strain on their marriage, and their 2 biological children would be immense. Adopt children of different races and the strains would be greatly magnified.

    The parents were not sincere White Liberals of any stripe. Liberalism ( Large L ) was under severe strain in the 1950s due to enforced integration ( euphemistically called de-segregation ). It died in the 1960s, in part due to “affirmative action”, that is government-enforced race quotas. That is anathaema to all true Liberals.

    Liberalism not only valued limited government, it also recognised the limits, god-given, if you will, placed on individuals and groups. It was not utopian in nature or outlook.
    What passes as modern American “liberalism” has very little or nothing to do with real American Liberalism, now deceased.

    By contrast, the parents were very much utopian in outlook.
    He ( the author ) was a true believer in his parents’ mission; every human problem could be solved by immigrants assimilating into the “white heterotopia of the American small town, the American suburb, and the American family.”

    Despite being Catholics, the parents seemed to have succumbed to a form of American Exceptionalism, very much an utopian ideology.
    This ideology, whether applied to foreign and military affairs, race, family or any other matter, is poison.

    • Replies: @G. Poulin
  12. Hinz says:

    The Zoo Population Growth

  13. Truth says:
    @Wokechoke

    He’s an Ivy League professor, and his lips make the ladies think he has some far-ago black heritage…. if you get my drift…

    I think he’s OK.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  14. Lurker says:

    “The Zero Population Growth people have the right idea. I don’t think we have the right to litter up the world with our offspring.”

    Indeed so. It turns we don’t. But other groups can go right ahead.

  15. Lurker says:

    When Bear finished college, he and his half-brother brought Miss Thung to the United States and Bear helped her get American citizenship.

    Good to know the worn-out Vietnamese prostitute quota was filled.

    • LOL: Lucky Jackson
    • Replies: @AceDeuce
  16. Solutions says: • Website

    And of course if the community doesn’t enthusiastically buy into this couples shall we say misguided utopian vision, then the community members are obviously the one’s with all the hang-ups, and their innocent adopted children will be further burdened with that false fact.
    I see this in churches all the time, miss-placed compassion.

  17. G. Poulin says:
    @Verymuchalive

    That poisonous ideology has been seeping into Catholicism for quite some time now. If Catholics of a former age were to see what is taught and believed in the Catholic Church today, they would not recognize it as the same religion.

  18. G. Poulin says:
    @Lucky Jackson

    Nowadays they would happily cut off his dick, and feel virtuous about it too.

    • Agree: Lucky Jackson
  19. AceDeuce says:
    @Lurker

    When Bear finished college, he and his half-brother brought Miss Thung to the United States and Bear helped her get American citizenship.

    Good to know the worn-out Vietnamese prostitute quota was filled.

    AKA “Patient Zero”.

  20. Hibernian says:

    Sheryl was a descendant of William Pratt, a founder of Hartford, Connecticut. She took the family on a trip to Old Saybrook, Connecticut, which has a monument to William Pratt.

    And a spiritual descendant of Oliver Cromwell and Cotton Mather.

    • Replies: @Comrade_Kabo
  21. Eric135 says:

    A lot of people have kids in order to torture them. This is a good example.

  22. Dutch Boy says:

    The old adoption paradigm was the childless or infertile adopting the parentless (often an orphaned relative). These people adopted in lieu of procreating more of their own, to the detriment of their natural children, which is doubly offensive.

  23. Anonymous[113] • Disclaimer says:
    @Truth

    Well, I have some far-ago black heritage (Louisiana), and I don’t have big lips or dick. But I am real good at basketball!

    • Replies: @Truth
  24. Truth says:
    @Anonymous

    Hey Bro, 1/3 will usually win you a batting title!

  25. Wow. Am I supposed to laugh or cry? I’m honestly not sure which would be the more appropriate response in this case. All I can say for sure is that, while every family may have its problems, I am damn glad I didn’t grow up in this one.

  26. @Rational Racist

    The disintegration of Western Civilization seems to be the result of too much introspection, or maybe miseducated introspection. Or, as they say around my hometown, “He’s got a head full of book-learning and not a lick of common sense.” I used to think they were just ignorant assholes. Now, I see they were right. But what do I know? For the record, I consider myself to be a rational race realist.

  27. @Hibernian

    Graham Lowry, Matt Ehret, and Lyndon LaRouche have some fascinating material on Cotton Mather. Cromwell was evil but Mathers was a hero.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Anastasia Katz Comments via RSS