RSS
Since the election of Margaret Thatcher’s Conservative government in 1979, Britain has undergone a great experiment. Economically, the UK became the exemplar of neoliberalism in Europe. Politically, the UK has quietly transitioned to a postnational state, undergoing one of the greatest demographic transformations in the West.
Although the landslide victory of Tony Blair’s “New Labour” in 1997 may have seemed like a return to the model of European social democracy that Britain exemplified after the Second World War, Blair’s “Third Way” represented rather the embrace of neoliberalism by the establishment Left, summed up nicely by their spokesman Peter Mandelson’s declaration that “we are all Thatcherites now”.
Under the leadership of both the Conservative Party and New Labour, Britain has transitioned from a traditional industrial and manufacturing powerhouse to a highly financialised rentier economy. The effects have been profound. The average Briton is considerably worse off and entire regions have been left behind at the same time London has become a booming centre of international finance. The UK has been denationalised by decades of mass-immigration and cultural leftism, and has become the prime example of “anarcho-tyranny”, where the state punishes minor offences and acts of dissent against the liberal consensus with extreme force, while serious crime runs out of control in major cities.
The Rentier Regime
The fundamental transformation in the British economy since the 1980s is the movement away from an economy that made things to an economy that made money . Up to then, Britain’s economic might had been centered on its manufacturing. Britain was the birthplace of the industrial revolution, and the dual expansion of its colonial empire and rapid advances in engineering allowed for the creation of a vast trading network, where colonies provided the raw materials and markets for British manufacturing. Northern English cities like Manchester, Sheffield and Newcastle became manufacturing powerhouses serving the world.
Britain has shifted from an entrepreneurial capitalism to rentier capitalism: an economic system organised around income-generating assets. In this system, ownership of sought-after scarce assets — land, natural resources, intellectual property — is the source of a significant portion of economic activity, and the regime is dominated by vastly wealthy rentiers. Wealth is built around having rather than doing.
In his book Rentier Capitalism, the economic geographer Brett Christophers showed that the main effects of Thatcherite-era reforms were to open up new income streams to rentiers that had little or no productive effects. The pattern since then has been the privileging of rentier accumulation over investment in productive economic activity. The share of UK GDP coming from manufacturing was 32% in 1973, today it is under 9%. The UK today is producing a lot of money, but not much else.
A number of developments have empowered rentiers and disempowered renters since the first Thatcher government: following the monetarist prescriptions of the Chicago school of economics, Thatcher’s government privatised vast quantities of public assets and deregulated financial markets, which allowed for a massive growth in interest-bearing credit (household debt increased from 37% to 70% of GDP under Thatcher). The big discoveries of oil and gas in Britain’s North Sea, as well as the emergence of new rent-generating digital technologies and platforms has also led to the swelling of rentier portfolios.
Successive governments have amended tax policy to favour rentiers. For example, in 2016 the Conservative government introduced “The Patent Box”, which allowed companies to pay a substantially lower corporate tax of just 10% on profits earned from intellectual property. This has mostly benefited corporate giants like GlaxoSmithKline, the UK pharmaceutical company who reported that this change led to them keeping an extra £458 million per year.
The UK was also the first government to pioneer Public Private Partnerships, under which public services and infrastructure are outsourced to private companies to collect rents, though much of the financial risk remains with the state. These PPP schemes have not only led to huge windfalls for the private companies operating them, but have been shown time and again to cost the government more than if it funded public projects directly. A report on “The UK’s PPPs Disaster” notes that:
Since 1992 PPPs yielded public assets with a capital value of $71 billion. The UK government will pay more than five times that amount under the terms of the PPPs used to create them.
Not only this, but much of this giant rent extraction from the British public to private finance is offshored and avoids taxation. In 2011, the UK Public Accounts Committee reported that investors were extracting huge profits from British taxpayers by buying up contracts for schools and hospitals funded through PPPs, and taking the proceeds offshore. The committee reported that many PPP contractors are based in offshore tax havens, making a mockery of the assumption held by the UK Treasury that these contractors would benefit the British economy by paying tax.
The Thatcher government also gave enormously generous terms for the oil companies which extracted British North Sea oil. The discovery of abundant oil and gas reserves in the North Sea can take a lot of credit for funding the economic boom in the 1980s, helping to mask the contraction that was happening in the real economy in this period.
But while countries like Norway invested large oil discoveries into long-term investments like sovereign wealth funds, Thatcher’s government used it to fund cuts in the higher rates of income tax. One economist estimated that had the 3% of national income that was being generated from oil and gas extraction been invested in ultra-safe assets, it would conservatively have been valued £450bn by 2008. Instead, this money was used to fund a great cash giveaway for the highest earners in British society, much of which was then invested back into property assets and used to inflate the housing market, rather than stimulate real economic growth.
Privatisation, deregulation and financialisation has led to Britain becoming, in the words of the Financial Times, a “rentier’s paradise”. All the while, this transformation and the huge wealth transfer it brought has been subsidised by the British public, most of whom have seen declining or stagnant living standards for decades. The UK is a rentier regime — all policy since the 1980s can be understood as favouring rentiers, even (and often) at the expense of the national interest.
London’s financial black hole
London had historically been the seat of British finance and government, but under Thatcher, the financialised economy began to increasingly decouple from the traditional economy while becoming the driving force behind the new model’s economic growth. The highest levels of the UK government and the Bank of England came to increasingly serve the interests of the London financial elite. The new model adopted in Britain was:
Very much influenced by people with financial market backgrounds. They knew a lot about the City and capital markets but relatively little about manufacturing and regional industries. Markets to them were all about transactions, not production, labour or materials. Industry was part of an ageing foreign space for them. Finance was their new world.[1]Davis, Aeron. Bankruptcy, bubbles and bailouts: The inside history of the Treasury since 1976. Manchester University Press, 2022. Pg. 82-83.
The graph below demonstrates the explosion in London-based financial services in delivering growth for the British economy
As well as allowing the growth of financial services in London, the deregulation of successive Thatcherite-Blairite governments has made London an enormous centre of speculation. Property in London has become an especially popular commodity for the world’s elites to speculate on. In 2015, it was reported that non-resident buyers had spent over £100 billion on UK property in the previous six years. Foreign buyers now account for 41% of activity on the London property market. Many of the high end residential properties snapped up by oligarchs are left empty — London now has over 34,000 homes classified as “long-term vacant”.
Hearing that London is both a booming financial centre and the top destination for the world’s super rich, anyone would be forgiven for assuming that this is an unmitigated good for the UK’s economy. But there is good evidence that the London financial centre has become a black hole on the rest of Britain and its more traditional economy.
It was conventional wisdom of the neoliberal reformers that a growth in the financial sector would benefit other sectors of the economy: not only is there more money fluctuating in search of investment opportunities, but a larger finance sector means more knowledge circulating about the markets it studies, more efficient markets, and thus more effective investments.
Since the 2008 financial crash, much has been learned that challenges this assumption. A 2015 study by the Bank of International Settlements concluded that:
The growth of a country’s financial system is a drag on productivity growth. That is, higher growth in the financial sector reduces real growth. In other words, financial booms are not, in general, growth-enhancing, likely because the financial sector competes with the rest of the economy for resources.[2]Cecchetti, Stephen G., and Enisse Kharroubi. “Why does credit growth crowd out real economic growth?.” The Manchester School 87 (2019): 1-28.
Referring specifically to Britain, the authors of The Finance Curse write that:
‘Financialisation’ has crowded out manufacturing and non-financial services, leeched government of skilled staff, entrenched regional disparities, fostered large-scale financial rent-seeking, heightened economic dependence, increased inequality, helped disenfranchise the majority and exposed the economy to violent crises. Britain is subject to ‘country capture’ with the economy constrained by finance, and the polity and media under its influence.[3]Christensen, John, Nick Shaxson, and Duncan Wigan. “The finance curse: Britain and the world economy.” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 18, no. 1 (2016): 255-269.
In 2018, a trio of economists tried to put a number on the cost of this ‘finance curse’. They concluded that in just a 20 year period, from 1995 to 2015, excessive financialisation cost the UK economy £4.5 trillion in unrealised growth.[4]Baker, Andrew, Gerald Epstein, and Juan Montecino. “The UK’s finance curse? Costs and processes.” SPERI report (2018).
Deregulation has also allowed the UK to become a global centre for financial fraud. A 2016 report estimated that financial fraud costs the UK £193bn per year — more than the entire budget of the National Health Service. Margaret Hodge, the former head of the UK’s Public Accounts Committee, named Britain as “the country of choice for every kleptocrat, crook and despot in the world”. In one high profile case that demonstrated this role London now serves, the city was at the centre of a massive Russian money-laundering scheme where Russian insiders laundered as much as $80 billion in dirty money, passing it through fictitious companies registered in London.
The City of London — the deregulated, semi-independent financial district of London — is also at the centre of the world’s “shadow banking” economy, which is now estimated to account for half the world’s assets. Britain has created, since the 1950s, a deeply complex financial ecosystem which makes use of deregulated offshore British jurisdictions like the Cayman Islands and Jersey, allowing the world’s super rich to hide their wealth and business activities from tax and regulation.
Deregulation by the British government of the “Eurodollar market” of offshore trading — done consciously at a time of British colonial decline to try and maintain British financial power — allowed the City of London to become “the main nerve centre of the darker global offshore system that hides and guards the world’s stolen wealth.” The City of London thus benefits from depriving the world of hundreds of billions in lost taxation and facilitating fraud and deceit on a massive scale.
An overlooked way in which financialisation drags down the rest of the economy is in how the rentier state treats the national currency. The attempt to make Britain a hub for inflows of foreign money has made successive governments want a “strong” or overvalued pound sterling relative to other currencies.
The effect of this overvalued pound contributed substantially to the decline of British manufacturing — exporters suffer from an overvalued currency, as their products become less affordable to other countries. From 1950 to 1970, Britain’s share of the world’s manufacturing fell from 25% to 10%. While this has often been presented as an inevitable feature of modernisation, in the same period Germany grew its share from 7% to 20%.[5]Eglene, Ophelia. Banking on Sterling: Britain’s Independence from the Euro Zone. Lexington Books, 2011. The key difference is that in Germany, monetary policies have consciously been set to favour the growth of industry, whereas Britain has treated industrial interests as subordinate to finance and banking.
In leaning on finance to replace the economic growth once provided by industrial output and innovation, Britain followed the course of other once great empires. Previous capitalist hegemons like Genoa and the Netherlands also encouraged financial speculation and tried to build their economies on usury as they went into decline.
For Britain, this has allowed the country to maintain a level of economic might that its citizens were accustomed to, but this is a precarious state of affairs. The economist Philip Pilkington explains how this affair with international finance works:
Britain is allowed to run large trade deficits because its trade partners are keen to hold British-domiciled financial assets. This in turn allows Britons to live beyond their means. Foreigners send Britain goods they would otherwise be unable to afford, Britain sends sterling in return and instead of dumping sterling onto foreign exchange markets — thereby driving down its value and rendering the goods less affordable for Britons — the foreigners buy British financial assets. Britain is a potentially rather low-income country living the life of a high-income country, and the whole show is kept on the road by the financiers in the City. A clever arrangement — but clearly an unstable one.
There is already reason to think this precarious relationship is in jeopardy. The rich are fleeing the UK in droves — 9,500 millionaires are set to leave the UK in 2024. The UK is only behind China worldwide for millionaire emigration, but outpaces it per capita by a factor of 14.
At the same time, many heavy hitters within the British economy are being sold to American capital. Blackrock has just finalised a deal to acquire the UK-based data provider Preqin for $3.2 billion. To economists like Pilkington, this is another phase in Britain’s long decline and retreat from the world stage, the final consolidation of a post-war settlement which made the UK a subordinate partner to the United States:
In the Eighties and Nineties, Britain managed to carve out a place in the world by becoming a major financial centre. But it has long been well-known that the City of London is just an outpost of Wall Street. Since the 2008 financial crisis, the City has waned in importance with more and more British companies being listed on the New York Stock Exchange. Now the financialised British economy is being actively weaponised against the country to asset-strip its companies and place them under American ownership.
Left Behind
A 2022 piece in the Financial Times painted a bleak picture of the economic reality for most Brits that is masked by popular measures of economic health like GDP. Although Britain has many wealthy people, the average person is not very well off compared to other developed countries. In fact, the lowest-earning bracket of households in Britain were 20% worse off than their counterparts in Slovenia. The British middle class is also rapidly declining in its living standard relative to the rest of Europe:
In 2007, the average UK household was 8 per cent worse off than its peers in north-western Europe, but the deficit has since ballooned to a record 20 per cent. On present trends, the average Slovenian household will be better off than its British counterpart by 2024, and the average Polish family will move ahead before the end of the decade.
Britain is, in the authors words, a poor country with some very rich people. Another way to put it might be that Britain is poor country with one very rich region. Data presented by the same author shows that removing London would take 14% off average British living standards, enough to leave the remainder of Britain poorer than every state in the US.
This reflects how much Britain’s general decline has been masked by the growth of finance capitalism. The British economy has been stagnant since the 2008 financial crisis. In the period since, real wages have declined by 3%. For comparison, real wages in Germany grew by almost 9% in the same period. This has been coupled with a cost of living crisis and persistently high inflation since 2021, as well as a rising cost in rents. More than a third of people in Britain spend over half their income on rent, 80% spent over a third. Here too, the shift to a rentier economy has been devastating.
In the general election that won her power in 1979, one of Margaret Thatcher’s more popular promises was the “right to buy”, promising over 5 million tenants of social housing the right to buy their home from the local authorities at much reduced rates. The average discount obtained by those availing of the scheme was 44%, an amazing bargain considering how much the value of many of these houses would inflate since — in southern England in 1981 the average valuation of a Right to Buy property was just under £20,000. Most sales were financed by lending.
This policy embodied Thatcher’s ethos as much as any, flogging off public resources at a discount, funded by private credit, and instilling in the millions of new homeowners a spirit of risk-taking individualism and independence from the welfare state.
In the following decade, rents rose substantially on those who did not avail of the Right to Buy. In effect, poorer renters subsidised through higher rents the ability of their wealthier neighbours to become homeowners. Since Right to Buy, the number of social housing available has plummeted, as has building of these houses. 40% of ex-council flats sold through statutory Right to Buy are now private rental properties. So, while lower-middle class Britons got to experience affordable home ownership in the 1980s, millions of younger people now exist in precarity around housing, forced into overly expensive privately rented accommodation with no hope of affording a home.
The scheme also took away power from local authorities, who can now do little about local housing problems other than turn to the London government. This was one of the largest privatisation schemes ever undertaken, a major step in the transition to a rentier economy, and a classic example of politicians cashing in on short term gain at the expense of long-term concerns. Much like the cash giveaway taken from North Sea oil, Thatcher’s government took from future generations for short term abundance.
Of course, no housing crisis can be explained just by looking at supply, and housing is one of the sectors of the economy most clearly affected by decades of mass-immigration.
The Migration State
I have previously written on Britain’s demographic transformation through mass-immigration. I won’t restate the analysis presented there, but in this context it is worth discussing how Britain’s transformation into a migration state went hand in hand with its embrace of neoliberalism.
The left in Britain, as in the rest of Europe, has been keen to present a narrative of Britain as a historically multicultural country. At the same time, the Dissident Right , in its focus on the radical changes affecting Europe after the Second World War sometimes miss just how recent the radical demographic changes of European nations are. The 1980’s …
Net-immigration to the UK exploded under the New Labour government after 1997, and continued with successive Conservative governments since the 2010s, now at a historic high. This was largely ideologically driven, as former Labour advisor Andrew Neather admitted his party wanted to rub the right’s nose in diversity, and “make the UK truly multicultural.”
But New Labour’s embrace of neoliberal economic prescriptions also drove this new approach to immigration, as Labour shifted from its traditional Keynesian economic approach to prioritise labour market flexibility and counter-inflation. Labour representatives spoke of the mass-migration of people as a necessary part of living in a global, financialised economy, comparing it to the free movement of capital. A special advisor to the party reflected on the change in immigration policy as coming from
the reorientation on economic policy of the centre left—away from Keynesian demand management towards a more explicit embrace of globalisation—lent itself more firmly towards embracing immigration too. The emphasis on skills and education and openness to global markets meant that you had people more open to arguments about migration being an important component of a successful economy.[6]Quoted in Consterdine, Erica. Labour’s immigration policy: the making of the migration state. Springer, 2017. Pg. 130
What began as New Labour policy has become cross-party consensus in Britain. Net migration was 685,000 in 2022. While a major motivation for many who voted to leave the European Union was an opposition to mass-immigration, the Tories have responded by increasing immigration. In fact, the main result of Brexit on immigration has been to simply swap EU migrants with even more culturally incompatible non-EU migrants.
It seems that, after decades of betrayal, voters concerned about immigration are at last willing to abandon the Conservative Party in droves. Though at this point, the change to British demographics has been enormous. The 2021 census of England and Wales showed that 10 million people, or one-sixth of the population, were born outside the United Kingdom.
In 2010, the demographer David Coleman produced an analysis which forecast White Britons becoming a minority by 2066. Since immigration has expanded greatly since then, this figure can likely be revised forward. Minority status is already a daily reality for many White Britons, who are now a minority in major cities like Manchester, Birmingham, Leicester, and London — where two thirds of the capital’s residents are ethnic minorities.
Anarcho-Tyranny
Another defining feature of the postnational British state is anarcho-tyranny, the increasing breakdown of the state’s capability to maintain law and order and its failure to prosecute the most basic crimes, combined with the increasingly tyrannical policing of civil society and suppression of liberties once taken for granted.
British police are now more incompetent than they have ever been: an investigation into their ability to investigate crime found that more than half the forces studied failed to meet basic standards. Not one of the 43 constabularies studied made the top category of “outstanding”. Most Britons no longer expect the police to investigate crimes like mugging or bike theft, and many no longer bother reporting these types of crimes. This is a correct assumption: between 2015 and 2023 in England and Wales the percentage of crime resulting in the offender being caught by the police and taken to court fell from 16% to 5.7%. Police now solve fewer than 3% of burglaries. Most criminals have little chance of ever facing punishment in the UK.
In contrast, the state has proven absolutely committed to policing the speech of White Britons, especially if it concerns criticism of multiracial liberal pluralism. A 2017 article in The Telegraph reported that more than 3,300 people were detained and questioned in the previous year over “trolling” on social media and other online forums. Two particularly egregious examples of this kind of policing came in 2018: first, a 19-year-old woman was convicted of sending a “grossly offensive” message after she posted rap lyrics that included the N-word on her Instagram page. Then, the YouTuber Count Dankula was found guilty of a hate crime for posting a video that showed his pug raising its paw in what he called a Nazi salute.
British police also track “non-crime hate incidents”, encouraging the public to report if they take offence to someone’s speech on the basis of their “protected characteristics”. The police are instructed that in the case of these reports “the victim does not have to justify or provide evidence of their belief, and police officers and staff should not directly challenge this perception.” Almost 120,000 of these incidents were recorded in the 5 year period from 2014 to 2019.
The greatest tyranny has been reserved for nationalists. This year, Sam Melia, an activist and organiser with Patriotic Alternative, was sentenced to two years in prison for “inciting racial hatred”. Melia had set up a group called the Hundred Handers on Telegram, which posted graphics intended for members to download and print as stickers. The stickers contained messages like “its OK to be white”, “love your nation” and “stop anti-white rape gangs”.
The prosecution used materials found in a search of Melia’s house, such as a book by Oswald Mosley, as “key signs of Melia’s ideology that underpinned his desire to spread his racist views in a deliberate manner.” Thus, Melia’s private reading material was used as evidence that he harboured views the prosecution considered racist.
At the trial itself, the prosecution acknowledged the language on the stickers were lawful, but were produced as a body of work intended to stir up racial hatred. The jury was also instructed to ignore any consideration of whether the statements on the stickers were actually true, as truth is no defence in cases such as this. The jury duly found Melia guilty, after which he was sentenced to two years in prison.
The ideological commitments of the stewards of the British state have not only led them to targeting political dissidents, but also to covering up crime on a massive scale. We now know that British police and state institutions ignored and helped conceal the greatest child sexual abuse scandal in British history, with a series of pedophile “grooming gangs” composed of Asian, mostly Pakistani men ignored for years.
A report into the worst of these, in the town of Rotherham in South Yorkshire, found that 1,400 children had been sexually abused from 1997 to 2013, predominantly by men of Pakistani origin. It revealed that council staff and others knew of the abuse but turned a blind eye to what was happening and refused to identify the perpetrators due to their fear of being branded as racist.
The same conclusion was reached after an 8 year investigation by the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse, which found that grooming gangs still existed across the country, but investigations into them were still being hampered by authorities’ fears of pursuing so many non-white criminals.
The End?
I am publishing this on July 4 2024, the day of a UK general election. By the time you read this, it is likely the Conservative Party will have suffered its worst electoral defeat ever, handing a landslide majority to the Labour party. Decades of betrayal of their patriotic voter base has brought them to a point of absolute fatigue. The Thatcher-Blair-Cameron neoliberal consensus which has governed Britain for almost half a century now has transitioned the country from a proud and cohesive nation into a postnational economic zone, increasingly subservient to American finance capital and in a state of terminal decline.
The prospects of reversing these trends is bleak, especially if political power shifts to a political Left equally committed to diversity and the repression of patriotic sentiment. But leaving the Conservative party in the dustbin of history may be a start to what remains of the English, Scottish and Welsh nations reasserting themselves.
Notes
[1] Davis, Aeron. Bankruptcy, bubbles and bailouts: The inside history of the Treasury since 1976. Manchester University Press, 2022. Pg. 82-83.
[2] Cecchetti, Stephen G., and Enisse Kharroubi. “Why does credit growth crowd out real economic growth?.” The Manchester School 87 (2019): 1-28.
[3] Christensen, John, Nick Shaxson, and Duncan Wigan. “The finance curse: Britain and the world economy.” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 18, no. 1 (2016): 255-269.
[4] Baker, Andrew, Gerald Epstein, and Juan Montecino. “The UK’s finance curse? Costs and processes.” SPERI report (2018).
[5] Eglene, Ophelia. Banking on Sterling: Britain’s Independence from the Euro Zone. Lexington Books, 2011.
[6] Quoted in Consterdine, Erica. Labour’s immigration policy: the making of the migration state. Springer, 2017. Pg. 130
English
Arabic
Chinese (Simplified)
Dutch
French
German
Hebrew
Hindi
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Russian
Spanish
Swedish
Turkish
Vietnamese
The Tories have done enough damage to the UK for now. Now it’s Labour’s turn to continue doing damage. Once Labour gets exhausted it will be the Tories’ turn again.
God bless democracy, it’s truly a wonderful system.
excellent article and yes, sunak was crushed, as he was ordered by his masters to fall on his sword. the same with macron in france, as the unseen ruling oligarchs have decided to change the puppet show. now the even greasier keir starmer will be at the helm of the rms titanic 2. this is the reward for this zionist sycophant, who sabotaged and ousted jeremy corbyn, as he was ordered to do by his masters, for his “anti-semitic” support of the long suffering palestinian peoples struggle to reclaim their homeland. corbyn won his seat as an independent in this same election but george galloway lost his seat to a labour candidate, a net loss, as this is trading a lion for a lamb, that will devoured by hyenas, as he was before.
if there is any good news, it is this: the political changes we see here and in the e.u., accompanied by dumping of the brandon regime in the u.s., seem to signal the ruling oligarchs acceptance of a new multipolar world, which will include a palestinian state, marking the end of zionism and heralding the demise of the zioneocon hegemonic rule.
of course this won’t help the middle class in the western world, as the parasites will now only be able to cannibalize their own citizens, as they are thrown out of their former colonial possessions, which will align behind russia and china in brics. yes, a new day is dawning in the east, as the sun sets on the zioneocon empire in the west, too bad we won’t be able to enjoy it.
Very good article, informative and a good summary of these phenomena. Thanks.
Keith, time gives perspective. Back in the day I looked at Maggie Thatcher as right old nasty c*nt – mostly due to the happenings in the Six Counties at the time. She still doesn’t give me a warm and fuzzy feeling -but something has to be said of her economic policies. The Brits were very far down the socialist road when she came into power, and to do the thing she did to the British economy took a woman with titanium balls. Just speaking economically, was Maggie wrong? At the end of the day I say no, because something needed to be done. Could it have been done differently? Maybe. Northern England & Scotland suffered under the change in policy -only because they were so far down the socialist road to begin with –and Maggie wasn’t wasting any time. She made Reagan look like an old Connemara granny knitting Aran sweaters -but the US wasn’t in the same position as the Brits. So, like most historical characters she is being seen in a different light than when she was going full throttle the early 1980s. BTW even back then I never saw Sinn Fein as the answer for the North’s problem – but the Irish people were in a rough spot.
I congratulate you for a truly excellent and informative article, Mr. Woods, an article which has no equal in explaining the reality of the situation in the present day UK.
In an ideal world anyone holding political power in the UK should be required to attend a video presentation of this article.
I agree with much, but the author seems to have slept through during the last 14 years.
The Tories attacked the City and those rentiers, in particular the still productive often non-dom ones, throughout that period, just speak to a tax adviser.
Why else do you think they have left and are still leaving in droves?!
And most of the immigration from 97 to 2016 was EU citizens, not culturally foreign one.
Without them, the UK would have been and be even worse off, particularly skill-wise.
Thatcher’s goose might not have laid many golden eggs, but it did lay some and many regular ones.
Injuring and hamstringing it without having an alternative is what brought about the UK’s current problems.
Labour doesn’t have one either, and wasting billions to enrich the pharma industry, MIC and green oligarchs is just that: a colossal waste of taxpayer money.
The milestone, I would say mill-stone events in Britain’s economic history;
a:) The CIA and Rothschild installed Heath government of 1970.
b:) Heath’s Chancellor Barbour’s 20%+ hyper-inflationary property/landlord/rentier boom.
c:) Heath’s joining the EEC, 1973, with no mandate on the orders of his boss, head of his Policy Unit since 1970, Victor Rothschild.
d:) Heath’s pointless battle with the mineworkers whose wages could hardly support their families. Resulting three-day week, manufacturing shutdown and losses, power-cuts etc.
e:) Inflation impoverished all and sucked in imports from the EEC, domestic manufacturing, agriculture etc. slumped.
f:) The rationalised, re-organised by Wilson state-run car industry got its act together under one management just as it was under-cut by a flood of European imports, plagued by strikes and power-cuts.
g:) Wilson on his return to power failing to simply get Britain out of the EEC, which was already killing the economy -no referendum was required to join, why have one after the fact?
h:) Wilson suddenly, mysteriously ill, handed over to Callaghan with Healey as Chancellor
i:) Callaghan Healey take huge and totally unnecessary IMF loan, begin privatisation in stages of BP, just as North Sea oil projects came massively on-stream.
j:) Unnecessary IMF loan’s conditions necessitate unnecessary public-sector pay freezes -private sector doesn’t comply. Inherited from Heath inflation still over 20%. More women enter workforce as two wages were needed to keep households in necessities.
k:) Public-sector and nationalised industries’ workers strike for living-wage. Massive oil revenues being hidden, government rolling in money, even repay never necessary IMF loan, plus interest, whilst pleading poverty, don’t reverse IMF conditions imposed. Winter of discontent.
l:) Thatcher. The end. As good as. Highly profitable state-run industries, 35 years of post-war capital investment, sold off at knock-down prices. End of integrated manufacturing economy, end of balanced diverse shock-proof economy, forever thereafter export-import trade deficit.
Thatcher didn’t have economic policies. Nations’ economies are not comparable to running a domestic household budget. She had two-minders fixtures who couldn’t be removed: her first Chancellor Geoffrey Howe, her second Chancellor Nigel Lawson. She was Prime-Minister in name only, they controlled her, she had no mind or agency of her own. Their not her economic policies amounted to wholesale theft, robbery, enriching very few, impoverishing very many tens of millions.
You can have no conception of the bleak scene that confronted school-leavers in the 1980s, everything they had grown up with and expected: full-employment, pay that could provide for a home and family had been pulled out from under them at one stroke.
They were the generation who’d never had it so bad, who would experience a much lower standard of living than their parents had. Exploitation for slave wages -no more than pocket-money, homelessness, drugs and grinding poverty, early deaths were their lot.
to summarize – and introduce the ((((key actor)), ignored by this wordsmith:
the Jews are in the saddle. When the Jews are in the saddle,
1. good jobs and productive industry are exported to foreign sweatshops,
2. jobs that cannot be exported are drowned in imported cheap labor,
3. so the Jews and their corporate/political hirelings get richer and richer
4. while mass consumption is sustained thru more and more debt,
5. said debt being controlled by the selfsame Jews.
“Deregulation has also allowed the UK to become a global centre for financial fraud.”
I remember reading about the below. Thanks for a great article.
UK is most corrupt country in the world, says mafia expert Roberto Saviano.
‘It’s not the bureaucracy, it’s not the police, it’s not the politics but what is corrupt is the financial capital’ Britain is the most corrupt country in the world, according to journalist Roberto Saviano, who spent more than a decade exposing the criminal dealings of the Italian Mafia.
Mr Saviano, who wrote the best-selling exposés Gomorrah andZeroZeroZero, made the comments at the Hay Literary Festival. The 36-year-old has been living under police protection since publishing revelations about members of the Camorra, a powerful Neapolitan branch of the mafia, in 2006.
He told an audience at Hay-on-Wye: “If I asked you what is the most corrupt place on Earth you might tell me well it’s Afghanistan, maybe Greece, Nigeria, the South of Italy and I will tell you it’s the UK.
“It’s not the bureaucracy, it’s not the police, it’s not the politics but what is corrupt is the financial capital. 90 per cent of the owners of capital in London have their headquarters offshore. “Jersey and the Cayman’s are the access gates to criminal capital in Europe and the UK is the country that allows it. That is why it is important why it is so crucial for me to be here today and to talk to you because I want to tell you , this is about you, this is about your life, this is about your government.”
https://archive.rai-see.org/uk-is-most-corrupt-country-in-the-world-says-mafia-expert-roberto-saviano/
Video Link
England needs a new Aethelred to slaughter all the occupiers.
Good article. Britain ( and other Western countries) going from more or less high functioning white societies to mafia like jewish run thirld world shitholes., based on lies, nothing of value, corruption, dysfunction.
60% turnout for British election so Labor cannot claim a mandate or the majority…40% don’t care for what was on the menu at all.
The fix was in also in France where the establishment got their dummy candidates to clump together, or not run at all, to get the result they wanted.
Britain and France are more irrelevant than ever…if you look at all the colored who now constitute the majority in France you can see the Rothschild project of control over a lesser race of black has come to fruition with their boy Macron manipulating the system perfectly so no serious opposition can ever form.
The West is irrelevant and now we have the village idiot in U.S not willing to get off the high spot of the village fence so Kamal can be king fool!
China is doing exactly the right thing…nothing, the West is doing it all for them.
“to summarize – and introduce the ((((key actor)), ignored by this wordsmith:”
The author did mention:
. (((The City of London)))
“The City of London — the deregulated, semi-independent financial district of London — is also at the centre of the world’s “shadow banking” economy, which is now estimated to account for half the world’s assets. ”
Look at Keith’s Twitter:
Tweets by KeithWoodsYT
He goes (((there))).
Phenomenal article.
Thanks.
“The fundamental transformation in the British economy since the 1980s is the movement away from an economy that made things to an economy that made money.”
This is historically ignorant, given the centuries-old development of the City of London as the premier global financial center and, indeed, the development of the British Empire and its plundering of resources / enrichment through trade. In this sense, the sharing of political power with both the owners of industrial capital and factory workers was a relative blip between the Great Reform Bill and the arrival of Thatcher, a 150 years or so.
Poor old Adam Smith was a great opponent of rentier extraction. Such parasitism in humans mirrors parasitism in nature as a whole. The parasite sucks the life-blood out of its host, and either lives in a stable and enduring relationship, or kills the host and, often, itself also.
Capitalism goes further by being, innately, neoplastic. It must grow, like the cancer, if only to pay the interest on debt, or sate the avarice of the capitalist caste. Marx predicted the financialisation of capital, as the rate of return on productive investment inevitably fell, and, once again, he is proved correct. ‘Interest grows without rain’, as they say.
A sixty percent turnout, of which ‘Labour’ won 33%, ie 20% of the electorate, and that is not the population as a whole. To install a Sabbat Goy puppet, married to a Jew and raising his children as Jews. And evil Jeremy Corbyn gained 40% on a 68% turnout ie 27.2%, in 2017, despite active sabotage by the Blairite Labour Party machine and a FEROCIOUS campaign of slander and lies.
Video Link
Don’t you talk bad about Maggie; gave miners’ sons the op to gay & dance for supper and make at least one dad proud.
Fishy Sunak
My job is to finish the Conservatives and open the door to Labour.
Nigger Farage
My job is to give false hope, and maintain the illusion of democracy.
Weird Starmer
My job is to destroy your country, your freedom and your future; close the gate on you.
Excellent essay.
I wouldn’t put much faith in “the Scottish nation reasserting itself,” however. The majority of Scottish people are center-left socialists: mindbroken, ideologically captured, and spiritually dead inside.
If Scotland was freed from the City’s tyranny and escaped the UK today, she would be on her knees begging the godless bureaucrats in Brussels to lick their hands for any scraps, tomorrow.
Austfailia has followed a similar course, ruled by idiots and dupes of truly monumental stupidity and dishonesty, since the Whitlam Government was overturned by the CIA and local compradores, led by ‘Cancer’ Murdoch, in 1975. Without the largess of Chinese trade, we’d be long ago bankrupt.
For one scintillating example of our utter imbecility, we sell ‘our’ natural gas overseas, but nearly ALL profits go to foreign corporations, who pay next to no tax or royalties, and our local gas prices are higher than in Japan, who also use our gas. And former Cabinet Ministers happily work for the mining interests after politics.
One more-we are going to fork out about one trillion in Imperial tribute to the UK and USA for nuclear submarines, that won’t be ready until 2040, say. It was just revealed, as every fool knew, that these are NOT for our defence but to work with our Imperial Master the USA, in attacking China, our greatest benefactor. A country of arrogant, self-satisfied, fuck-wits.
Philia
Aristotelian concept signifying „friendship“ – ethno-cultural consensus between members of the same city.
For Aristotle, democracy is possible only within homogeneous ethnic groups, while despots have always reigned over highly fragmented societies.
A multi-ethnic society is thus necessarily anti-democratic and chaotic, for it lacks philia, this profound, flesh- and blood fraternity of citizens.
Tyrants and despots divide and rule, they want the City divided by ethnic rivalries.
The indispensable condition for ensuring a people’s sovereignty accordingly resides in ist unity.
Ethnic chaos prevents all philia from developing.
A citizenry is formed on the basis of proximity – or it is not formed at all.
“Why We Fight: Manifesto of the European Resistance” by Guillaume Faye (2011)
In the UK they give the whites two State controlled Commie parties to vote for: Labour & Conservative. Both are owned/directed by Commie Jews. Same basic setup here in USrael–where the Semitic State gives the morons the Commie Democrat & Republican parties. But hey, welcome to your Jewocracy.
Good analysis of some of the financial mechanics behind the UK’s bubble economy but article falls apart when author relies on prejudicies to explain facts.
The major problem is HUBRIS whether for UK or Europe. Europe was a basically a feudal disease- ridden backwater before colonialism so it’s returning to its roots.
They believe themselves somehow better, more “civilized” etc. etc. because they had better weapons and were willing to kill any non-white without a second thought for 500 years until the rest of the world had enough.
The Chinese and Indians may have discovered that the earth moves around the sun thouands of years before Copernicus but the Eurocentric educational model insists it was Copernicus. …
whatya gonna do?
1. All European “prosperity” for the last 500 years has been based on:
-spoils from colonialism of Africa and Asia
-attempts at corporate neocolonialism
-MASS MIGRATION of EUROPEANS for 500 YEARS followed by genocide in the Americas and Australia
-enthusiastic participation in wars on Europeìs doorstep creating poverty on Europe’s doorstep, followed by astonishment at migration
2. Crime is a result of bad government and bad policing.
What Lady Maggot Thrasher ‘did ‘apart from letting her pirate son sell ‘hot’ , computer chips , breaking Reagan’s high tech embargo on the U.S.S.R. , and , creating a deflect war on Argentina to , mask criticism from naked subsidised elite capitalism , as noted in the essay . But there was more to camouflage incompetence . Another ‘wealth transfer ‘ . The working white and poor who lived in ‘ Government Housing, Housing Commission , or Council flats , were offered purchase rights for said properties and housing on gifted ‘generous’ terms . Public assets privatised .These houses were then on sold to ” the new wave of migrants suckers , and cashed up replacements ”, to the U.K. This windfall , capital gain free, combined with the ability of British Pensioners to ‘holiday permanently in’ Old’ Colonies , to sex -stay in Asia , or loiter in a Europe was a boom, and broom clean. Such creative kicking of the proverbial can , was akin to the new juggle, actually happening now . Perhaps the Royals will lose their heads , and ‘their’ Duchy lands to settle the ledger next time .
I never heard it put thus. The word always has it that The City is number one, not just between the UK and the US but number one in the world. If Jerusalem is the capital of the world, okay, then the strings pulled are still moving the game pieces out of London.
When you factor in what Marschalko called The World Conquerers in his book of the same name, the money game is a bit like the empire game where some glory goes to this royal family for a bit, but the players all retain their initial value. When the Dutch moved their money to Paris and London, London got the top spot because the Rothschilds, like everyone else, did not trust the French.
I am struck by the similarity, though with staggered delivery, of the Thatcherite debauch of Britain and how it compares with the Reagan-installed rentier USA or the Mulroney hit on the average Canadian. Not the same; still, the differences in one area are balanced with oddities in another. They don’t want their citizens to catch on. So incestuous, our lords and ladies.
Conservatives just suffered their worst-ever loss of seats in Parliament, going back to the early 19th century, in a snap election called by Rishi Sunak.
Odd that the Lügenpresse offered so little analysis of this epic electoral thrashing. One might surmise that at least some Britons found it intolerable to be ruled by a plutocratic westernised oriental gentleman who does not look British.
Presumably one reason this topic of racial resentment as a source of the Tories’ electoral Waterloo remains largely unexplored is that it would subject its proponents to arrest in the UK. Thus a polite enforced silence prevails.
Speaking from outside Britain’s degenerate regime of ‘tyrannical policing of civil society,’ I can safely aver that I found the alien visage of Sunak impersonating the prime minister nauseating. Evidently millions within the UK agreed, and trounced the Tories like never before in their muffled rage, disgust and resentment over their cultural marginalisation.
More evidence that banker Jews were the real victors of WW2 and everyone else lost.
England – Flooded with foreigners by Jews.
Ireland – Same.
Sweden – Same.
Germany – Same.
Italy – Same.
Spain – Same.
France – Same.
Norway [which is not even part of the EU which proves the EU is not the main problem] – Same.
USA – Same.
Canada – Same.
Australia – Same.
New Zealand – Same.
On and on and on. The few hold outs like Hungary is being fined 1 million Euros a day until they cave to the White replacement plan.
Meanwhile – Israel’s borders are CLOSED to everyone but Jews!!! And they are waging a war of genocide in Gaza to expand liebestraum [living space] for Jews, and allow Jewish [and usually American-Jewish] to build illegal colonizing settlements though out the West Bank. ALL with large walls.
So, you mentioned the Age of Discovery that Europeans did during the last 500 years, which mapped the entire planet and built cities world wide, along with abolishing the slave trade through out the Islamic World [which you call Colonialism].
Now, mention the scientific gifts that Europeans gave to the world in addition to the Age of Discovery – electricity, air conditioning, modern medicine, space flight, combustion engine, keyboard/cell phone which you typed your message out with, flight, genetic research and cures for dozens of illnesses today.
Europeans gave to the world while non-Europeans gave very little. The Chinese and Indians came up with a few things but it’s nothing compared to the small list I mentioned, and not anything to the whole list which would go on for pages.
I’m starting to consider that the Jews are actually aliens who want to take over our planet and eliminate all the inhabitants. I also wouldn’t be surprised that there are large underground complexes, hiding places for the Jews where they go and live during WOIII which could be the final nuclear happening. The Jews have us by the balls , 95 % of Homo sapiens sapiens haven’t got a clue , that’s how the Jews want it. The end is coming for the people of Europe and the inhabitants of planet earth. The Jews wanna have it all. 2800 slaves per Jewish person will be allowed to stay on this planet , I doubt they will choose white workers. I think they will pick Indians as they are also polytheistic, some white females will be caged up sex slavery and organ harvesting but that’s it I think. We are fucked for 100 % the Jews won. thank you Anglo-Saxons. And thank you William of Orange. Thanks mister Cromwell
An excellent article !. As regards British Hate Speech legislation – maybe it could be made to boomerang on the tyrants by reporting the hate speech about us Goyim being subhuman found in texts such as the Torah and the Talmud etc, I’m guessing one would report the publishers and synagogues where this was published/read out ?
This can’t be. HBD writers like the crypto-Jew Steve Sailer have assured me that Anglos are “low corruption” people, in contrast to “high corruption” Chinese, Slavs, Southeast Asians, and Muslims. You’re telling me that Anglos and Jews have been lying and they aren’t actually the people with the lowest corruption in the world? I’m shocked.
Further, why does Irish nationalist Keith Woods spend so much time fretting about the state of Britain and the Anglo slave race? Britain and Anglos are the greatest enemy of the Irish. The biggest threat facing Ireland has come from it being Anglicized in recent decades.
the political changes happening in the NATO assembled west ..signal the ruling oligarchs acceptance of a new multipolar world, but it also signals that the disenfranchise governed masses have little chance to fix things by elections. Much greater changes than elections can bring about are needed. The election trends suggest multipolarity may return the economies of the NATO assembled west from their current Financialisation economies back to competitive goods and services producing economies. But we are I believe two world war away from that change to take effect. Until the masses can force a change greater than the wealthy can generate, economic education and economic systems will always favor the rich and powerful.
‘Financialisation’ has crowded out manufacturing and non-financial services, leeched government of skilled staff, entrenched regional disparities, fostered large-scale financial rent-seeking, heightened economic dependence, increased inequality, helped disenfranchise the majority and exposed the economy to violent crises. Britain is subject to ‘country capture’ with the economy constrained by finance, and the polity and media under its influence.[3]
Why does money laundering affect things? Corruption in the public sector far exceeds private corruption?
governments have been separated from the people they governed. The fence separating those who govern from the governed masses is the digital platform. Its built of bits placed on top of physical networks and is guarded by authentication technology and policed by elite dependant warriors.
Nothing is going to get better until the system fails and the masses send the wealthy and politicians, economist , bankers, social and political scientists and corporate executive elite, not just in one nation, but in every nation, all at the same time, to the guillotine because those on top have no reason whatsoever to change things and those at the bottom do not understand the cause of the problem, they just live with it.
The unrest the election outcomes reveal is universal to the NATO assembled collective west. A recent German study found 0% of the people were very satisfied with their government.
Thatcher had Asperger’s Syndrome. Most female Aspies as kids were tomboys and want to hang out with the guys rather than the girls with their clique based emotional games. A minority will be like Thatcher and all have an unyielding iron Will, Thatcher being the ‘Iron Lady’. Their faculty of Will is fused with their faculty of Understanding. Both types love hard sciences and Thatcher graduated with a Chemistry major. In politics her Understanding was that of the Chicago school and all of her Will was devoted to implementing their monetrist policies. There were problems with Britain’s industrial base due to the terrible class system still inherent in British society since the Norman Conquest, the unions and management never cooperated. Thus something needed to be done and the monetrist remedy was to liquidate all the physical assets to obtain cash. Like all Aspies she was a prisoner of her psychological beliefs. Everyone is to an extent but neurotypicals have the capacity to at least contemplate alternatives. Not Thatcher. For younger people Greta Thunberg is a similar example of Aspie single minded focus and dismissal of other stakeholders.
Serving the world? I wonder about that. Consider automobile manufacturing. In the ’60s and ’70s there was nothing on four wheels more garbage than an English car. Jaguar, for example. Of course this was an era when US automobiles were on the way out to superior quality Japanese product, but I think you could count on British Leyland as the lowest of the low.
From experience I can tell you that an Italian Fiat (or Alfa) had better QC than MG, and there wasn’t much of anything as crappy as a Fiat or Alfa. So you wonder about other Brit made products. In fact I don’t remember much of anything considered exceptionally high quality coming from England back then. Maybe it was out there, but off the top of my head I can’t name one.
I guess you could say the the entire country went the way of their industry. Rotted from the inside out.
Thank you Keith, excellent article once again.
“…may be a start to what remains of the English, Scottish and Welsh nations reasserting themselves.” I agree -if only the UK could be broken up, and England could re-emerge, I could see some slight grain of hope for a worthwhile culture. The UK is the warmaking entity, dedicated to Eternal War, and without it we could at least hope for a peace. Both England and Scotland would then need to repudiate the ILLUSORY DEBT of the UK.
Hope I live long enough to see this. Scotland would say to England, ‘Here’s trident – you can have it back!’ the English would reply, “Aargh, no, we don’t want it!’ the British only want their nuclear subs provided they can be kept in Scotland.
It’s fashionable to lay this at Thatcher’s doorstep, but it actually began long before her prime ministership.
In the 1970s, the Callaghan government couldn’t even get the trash collected and had trouble keeping the lights and heat on. The government went hat in hand to the IMF for an epic bailout, something formerly thought of as a last resort for mismanaged third world sh*tholes.
In the 1960s, deficit problems forced Britain to devalue the pound and renege on its Bretton Woods exchange rate commitments. Britain’s industrial production since WWII had been manifestly weak, though its financial sector was not therefore strong.
Though it was an early progenitor of the industrial revolution, it wasn’t the earliest. In the sixteenth century Thomas More was already complaining that British landowners were enclosing pastures and evicting farmers to raise wool to export as raw material to the Low Countries’ spinning mill industry (on French-designed looms).
By founding new colonies and conquering new markets over the next centuries, Britain managed to make itself the industrial center of a new imperial mercantile system, but by the early twentieth century cracks were already beginning to show. American, German, and even Japanese manufacturers were making better and/or cheaper products. Great Britain could shield itself from this reality temporarily behind tariff walls, but even waging a couple of world wars did not see off the threat and by the second half of the twentieth century Britain had to face that its manufacturing was not globally competitive and had only ‘succeeded’ within the system of imperial preferences. By Thatcher’s time the choice was between losing everything and becoming another late-stage Rome/Byzantium/Portugal/[insert former imperial capital here] or salvaging the financial machinery and becoming a global trade/finance/money laundering hub. Thatcher and every subsequent government chose the latter. Was that the right choice? I dunno. C.f. Rome/Byzantium/Portugal/etc.
If it’s any consolation, this may be the inevitable fruit of imperial hegemony. Returns from monopsonies and influence peddling crowd out genuine productivity, until the system eventually succumbs to competition from producers who didn’t evolve under those distortions. The same thing is happening to the formerly mighty USA, the inheritor of Britain’s global hegemon mantle, just a generation or two delayed from Britain’s experience.
C’mon. The news isn’t all bad. Maybe if London/NY/DC can gin up a war vs. Russia/China/Iran, LND will gododo. The war is done, I’m standing pretty. In this dust that was a city. And here is a red balloon. I think of you and let it go.
Anglo-Saxons are barbarians, always have been. They are the dumbest of whites and the ugliest as well.
They are an inbreed race and for centuries cousin sister banging was widely accepted in Britain pre-modern times. Everything they produced was of horrible quality and in nothing they could compete with supreme German produce. The space Jews who are actually Aliens have always known this, head’s why they planted their base in London. According to a friend of mine there’s over 300 spaceships flying over Mexico on a daily base, they are being spotted by humans as well. It is no secret anymore , there’s Jews in space waiting for atomic warfare WOIII to kill of all of humanity , the sign that they can come and take what is ours. Space jews folks space jews
Norsofast… This article reminds me of the joke: England is like an old hag with a glorious past but no future. It is true, however, the only thing I would change is “a glorious past” to “a criminal past.”
The City of Dragons and the Brutish Clown need collateral to shore up their Ponzi scheme or offshore Dollars or Shadow Banking, leveraged to the hilt by Derivatives which is simply insurance on the high risk loan or gamble. This market is secretive and unregulated with an estimated size of over 1 Quadrillion. No want wants to think about this market imploding.
The English Inbreds desperately need collateral and the ME is the last hope after loosing Ukraine. I am afraid the Palestinians will be consumed especially with Hamas using the Algerian model of resistance, Martyrs in return for liberation. Algerians lost a million to the French.
Shadow Banking’s center is the UK where all the psychopaths of the world from dictators to drug dealers pay no taxes and enjoy full secrecy. They need collateral to keep it going in the face of BRICs demanding Gold for commodities or tangible for tangible. No more “faith and credit” after seizing Russia’s billions.
It is not all bad news.
One of the most far reaching defeats to the Deep State is the Chevron Deference or Doctrine Case.
No more vague legislation by the whores in Congresd and no more interpretations by the Ziocons soaked Deep State and in the end deference by the courts to the Deep State.
Congress needs to do its job. For example no more penalties assessed by governmental agencies including the EPA. No more Corporate average fuel economy standards (CAFE) rules. Stop forcing Americans to buy useless EVs and allow rural America to buy Toyota Hilux pickups for $13K as sold in Mexico. The demand is huge.
https://www.scotusblog.com/2024/06/supreme-court-strikes-down-chevron-curtailing-power-of-federal-agencies/
Don’t waste your time with this non white troll. He knows perfectly well that he writes BS but he can’t resist to bash the whites he envies.
So the rentier class in the UK took over when her “nastiness”, Margaret Thatcher took over. Same thing happened in the USA – only in our case, the asshole responsible was Milton Freidman. He was the guy who gave our “greedies” the notion that the only obligation of a bottom feeding corporation was just to make more money.
Someday, our working class will wake up with an awful headache and will slaughter our “greedies”.
Hah! You had goin there. For a moment I almost gave a shit about what is happening in England. Good one.
If you believe the megalomaniac Jews, ( and being a catholic you should know better ), you are delusional yourself. By destroying their best host they are destroying themselves, and they are on the path of self destruction. They are non intelligent parasites.
Good article and coherent.
The last Prime Minister who in any way cared about British people was Harold Wilson who twice came into office after Tory credit expansion wrecking ball policies – 1964 and 1974 – but was gone before N Sea Oil revenues came onstream
Thatcher simply wiped out male employment as was an early Green/Global Warming believer who was surrounded by Communists like Alfred Sherman and opportunists like Hanson and Sterling and liquidated State assets at a discount to prevent re-nationalisation
Thatcher destroyed Solutions but left Problems untouched
Crap. Healey set up the IMF stunt to squeeze Cabinet into stupid cuts in CapEx. Derek Maugham was the IMF team leader – ex-British Treasury and later J P Morgan
There was never any need for IMF loan. H M Treasury figures were cooked
I feel sad & sorry for the fair dinkums Dow Under…
It makes me chunder…
https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/australian-judge-who-dismissed-covid-vaccine-lawsuit-failed-to-disclose-she-was-on-pfizer-payroll/
Greed/Capitalism is like fire. A good servant, but a bad master.
It’s alternative history. No mention of colonialism and empire.
It also has a strange take on the industrial production numbers post WWII. On 1950 most of the industrial Europe was in ruins, so of course UK had “25%” and naturally by 60s (Marshall plan ring a bell?) Germany was producing again.
Also as an American, it is not my sense that we corrupted UK, rather the other way around. UK was ahead of US in letting the “rentiers” take the whole cake. This happened in US in Clinton’s tenure not Reagan’s.
Post 9/11, it were the British that were lecturing US audiences on “how to act like an empire” and urging US to accept it is an “empire”.
Cultural products in US are now almost wall to wall British accents and British actors. It is shocking the extent that the UK cultural machine has penetrated the American cultural space.
Finally, it is really hard to feel sad for poor British. They were sucking the morrow of the world for at least 100 years and is the nation that gave (((Banksters))) their first sovereign fortress. So Karma?
Just from your first paragraph, you show you need to do more research.
When one talks about the world, one should first be familiar with other civilisations. I go line by line.
What enabled them to do these things?
Calculations using the numeral zero (0) – invented by the Indians, transmitted through the Muslims
Naviational Compass – invented by the Chinese 12th century
Sextant – invented by the Muslims 8th century
Stern rudder – invented by the Chinese 5th century
Paper for maps – invented by the Chinese 2nd century
Water tight compartments – invented by the Chinese 2nd century
One should not sound like a rich kid who inherited a fortune from his father, yet boasts that he “succeeded” all on his own steam.
You mean colonised world wide.
You might think of it as compliment, but 85% of the population of the world does not. To them, it speaks of a particular avarice and warlikeness of Europeans.
Here is what Mahathir, former Prime Minister of Malaysia had to say:
We have traded with China for 2000 years, and they have never tried to conquer us. Yet within 50 years of contact with the Europeans, they had already begun to take our cities (Malacca).
I add that the Malaysians had a similar experience with India, with whom they had trade and cultural links for even longer than China, yet never conquered them.
One should not flatter oneself and think of European colonisation as a “gift to the world”. There is another way to look at it, …… like “an infestation out of control”.
Why do you focus on the Muslim part of the slave trade, when the Europeans were a major part of it? This is called “shifting the blame”.
Why are you so proud of abolishing something that your people were so intimately involved in the first place. It is like saying “I am such a good guy, because after murdering my brother, I repented. See how good I am?”
Besides, Europe was hardly the first to abolish chattel slavery. The Chinese did it circa 250BC.
Thanks. I agree:
Nothing is going to get better until the system fails and the masses understand the cause of the problem and no more want live with it.
you’re spot on about the derivates market, that’s the real time bomb and the longer it ticks, the bigger it gets. when that blows, there’s not enough money in the world to reinflate it, that will bring down the whole house of cards. it’s not so much the atomic chain reaction but the economic chain reaction, that will bring down the west.
Why do hate and ignorance always pair?
You haven’t been paying attention: they can, and they will claim a mandate.
Better take your tax-free lump sum from your pension now and find a way to move the money to Singapore while you can.
“WHY THE BRITISH want to reproduce themselves is a question which is as puzzling in its own way as that of the origin of life.
Their existence is so wretched, so utterly lacking in anything reasonably resembling a purpose, so devoid of those things that make human life worthwhile (I am merely paraphrasing what thousands have told me) that it is a marvel that they should go in for children.
I suppose the nearest I can come to an explanation is that they hope a child will supply the want that they feel: the triumph of hope over experience, for they soon discover that a British child merely adds chores to emptiness.”
Theodore Dalrymple
That quote may be modified with “Find & Replace” command
BRITISH -> …..
excellent work, very clearly and elegantly expressed. greatly clarifies and changes my understanding of UK. also, this article is a model of good prose – thorough, succinct, logically coherent, deeply illuminating and interesting from start to finish
Of the three book religions, Christianity fits the European population best, because its core message (altruism) corresponds with the survival concept of co-operation, without which the Nordic peoples could not have survived either the Ice Age or the period that followed. In contrast to the Saracens, who raided European coasts for centuries and plundered them year after year, European seafarers (Portuguese and Dutch) brought trade and change, built bases, raised the standard of living of the locals and in this way unwittingly ensured the global population explosion. In the New World, things were a little different, but only because of firearms. Prior to this, the indigenous population had mercilessly decimated each other. Before you start counting civilisational achievements against each other, you should rather ask who was prepared to share them for the benefit of all. Some ethnic groups completely lack the desire to help the weaker, which is why Westerners are now paying the price for being too good-natured.
Actually it was accurate clocks are what enabled European blue ocean navies. That was invented in Europe.
Keith Woods writes:
This is NOT Capitalism.
These Public Private Partnerships (PPP’s) are examples of CRONY CORPORATISM – whereby the oligarchs collude with government to receive monopoly positions in those industries that are privatised.
In Free Market Capitalism :
1) There are NO BARRIERS to prevent new competitors from entering the market at any time to keep the established players honest (seeing as the latter may be overcharging and/or under-delivering on service and quality).
2) When the government sells off an asset to the private sector (which is invariably run less efficiently than by the private sector in a competitive environment), said private entity would assume ALL RISKS thereafter.
In other words, if the private sector entrepreneur makes a loss, the private entity should be liable.
When the government does a deal with an oligarch after selling off a state owned asset, whereby they assume some of the financial risk, this a case of:
Heads the Oligarch wins, Tails the taxpayer loses.
This a CORRUPT deal and, assuming it’s not illegal, it should be.
Said politician that signed off on the deal, should be named and shamed (and thereafter prosecuted and subject to a lengthy custodial sentence).
Translation: the Jew parasites have deceived everyone with massive lies and have taken over. Goodbye white goyim! Changing to a “finance” economy is just Jew communist talk for Jews owning everything! Under Jew communism Jews would be the small group controlling everything. Either people will be willing to fight to get their nations back or Jews will fuck everyone and eliminate whites.
The jewish concept of dermal nationalism has caused mass schizophrenia among ethnic Europeans. As long as the kikes and the anglos still exist, individual European ethnicity will continue to die out.
It needs to be understood that what is happening now was done BY DESIGN. The Reaganites, the Thatcherites, behind closed doors, KNEW how ruinous to the Average Citizen their policies were going to be. And, these deeply cynical Political Operatives also knew they couldn’t name their Economic policies honestly. They called it Neoliberalism or Free Market Economics instead of a more accurate name, such as Class Warfare Economics or Political Donor Economics or Special Interest Economics. How can one know the political rhetoric you hear on the tightly controlled Mainstream Media (MSM) is pure propaganda? Because if the Political Class were not Soldiers in the Class Warfare economic model they would make reforms to the Reaganite/Thatcherite economic models. They don’t do ANYTHING to fix all of the Economic issues facing the average Taxpayer, which are obvious and have been for a long time. Washington DC can and WILL move at lightening speed if it wants to. I give as evidence the speed with which the War in Ukraine is funded or funding to Israel is done. The average taxpayer will have to rise up and DEMAND changes not ask for them or hope for them. Won’t happen that way.
Like all Statists that believe in Bloated Big Gubmint, Keith Woods writes:
Keith Woods believes that such and such crisis/financial collapse/[insert national cataclysm of your choice] could have been averted if only we had a FEW MORE REGULATIONS in the books, if only we had a few more parasitic lavishly remunerated bureaucrats monitoring the greedy and rapacious private sector.
Let me help you Mr Woods, and simplify matters by introducing one law only that covers every situation.
Yes, let’s make a law that says:
Henceforth, CRIME WILL BE ILLEGAL.
And how effective do you think that will be? Of course criminals, by definition, do NOT OBSERVE THE LEGAL STATUTES. (That’s why they’re called ‘criminals’).
FACT: There have never been more laws in the books than right now, and yet there is MORE CORRUPTION and fraud (certainly in qualitative terms), than in the past when far fewer laws had been legislated.
Meanwhile, let’s take a real world example of something that occurred on September 11, 2001.
For EFF’S SAKE, I suspect there were more than a few regulations/laws at that time (relating to treason), which outlawed the input of those traitors in the U.S Government, Military and Intel agencies who aided and abetted the Mossad in carrying out that False Flag.
But what good did those regulations do if ZOG controls the government and all the regulatory/three letter agencies – who were told to turn a blind eye. (Just like the SEC, a government financial regulatory agency, turned a blind eye for years to the activities of Bernie Madoff).
This is nicely explained by the following excerpt, extracted from a newletter from the great libertarian Tom Woods Phd:
SUMMARY: There is only one solution that MINIMISES financial fraud (there is no magic prescription that will eliminate fraud and other criminal behaviour, as we’ll always have individuals lacking in integrity amongst us).
And that is to radically downsize Big Gubmint, and decentralise as much as possible (so that local communites can monitor the expenditures/contracts awarded etc, at close quarters).
If the few government departments that remains have LIMITED FUNDING and said politicians/bureaucrats within them have greatly diminished powers, then by definition the degree of fraud/corruption (financial or otherwise), will be greatly reduced.
The West is being destroyed by people who fund and run the political systems for their own evil purposes. It is no different in America. Manufacturing was sent to China starting in the Reagan years and the border was opened and both Democrats and Republicans played a part in changing America’s demographics. There are no political solutions now as those wanting to reverse the damage in France just found out and as MAGA supporters in America will also find out.
How long have you been woke?
“The greatest tyranny has been reserved for nationalists. This year, Sam Melia, an activist and organiser with Patriotic Alternative, was sentenced to two years in prison for “inciting racial hatred”. Melia had set up a group called the Hundred Handers on Telegram, which posted graphics intended for members to download and print as stickers. The stickers contained messages like “its OK to be white”, “love your nation” and “stop anti-white rape gangs”.
The prosecution used materials found in a search of Melia’s house, such as a book by Oswald Mosley, as “key signs of Melia’s ideology that underpinned his desire to spread his racist views in a deliberate manner.” Thus, Melia’s private reading material was used as evidence that he harboured views the prosecution considered racist.
At the trial itself, the prosecution acknowledged the language on the stickers were lawful, but were produced as a body of work intended to stir up racial hatred. The jury was also instructed to ignore any consideration of whether the statements on the stickers were actually true, as truth is no defence in cases such as this. The jury duly found Melia guilty, after which he was sentenced to two years in prison.”
That jury must have been a bunch of third world darkies and retarded karens. It goes w/o saying the CPS are: else why would they take the case to court?
No, they’re not space-lizards. They obviously do want to take over the planet and eliminate or enslave the inhabitants. They are merely carrying out the will of their god, which is to steal, kill and destroy. Your own scripture tells who they are in no uncertain terms: The Synagogue of Satan.
Instead of Christ’s summary of the commandments:
the Jew-God Satan’s commandment is summarized in four one-syllable words: Do What Thou Wilt. It took a British Satanist to provide that blunt four-word summation of Judaism’s core worldview. Like a Jewish shyster ’splainin’ away some thug’s b.s. excuse for murder, the Talmud (Jew Holy Book) takes many thousands of words to subvert and invert (e.g. “interpret”) ten simple commandments. It’s kind of a template for the “Commentaries” of Cyrus Scofield (another ‘made’ man) on the Christian bible (talmud writ small). The Kosher Nosetra has no doubt backed up similar “commentaries” on the Quran and other peoples’ scared texts.
The Kosher Nosetra were Nietzscheans two millenia before the unstable German ever existed. This Mafia of Mafias (which includes plenty of goyische ‘converts’ by the way) does indeed have supernatural power and is likewise favored by a ‘God’ (powerful spiritual force) of sorts (aka ‘God of This World’, ‘Prince of Persia’, ‘Beelzebub’, ‘Baphomet’, etc.). It’s just not the one the retarded Christian Zionists (who are nearly as clueless as the Rev. Jones’ flock in Guyana were) think it is. Of course your own Anti-Pope and his Vatican II flock are no different – following Rev. Hagee and his gang down into the very same smoldering pit. Hell of a job, Franny!
“One economist estimated that had the 3% of national income that was being generated from oil and gas extraction been invested in ultra-safe assets, it would conservatively have been valued £450bn by 2008. Instead, this money was used to fund a great cash giveaway for the highest earners in British society, much of which was then invested back into property assets and used to inflate the housing market, rather than stimulate real economic growth.”
So, Great Britain isn’t broke after all! It’s just that the Rothschilds & crew have been the shock absorbers for that loot. My suggestion would be to grab that illicit gains now before they’re shanghaied over to China, to the new Promised Land… I can see it right here in Manhattan… all svelte Chinese concubines packing there bags for the Paris of the Orient.
Great post, thanks! Reminds me of when me and five other Americans went to England (summer, 1970), stayed 8 weeks or so with family near Brighton (went to lectures at Sussex U), and when I went to London and saw folks with Enoch Powell-type badges on about keep “Pakis” out (Paki-bashers), and the rest of the story, and spent a night in a part of Greater London that is now almost completely immigrant…and guess what? This family was Jewish! Who woulda thunk it? But yes, under Thatcher is when things really went downhill, especially the northeast (where my novel characters are from…one of them even mentions Thatcher’s “privatisation” that screwed the northeast). On the way to the 1970 Isle of Wight rock festival (at Southhamptom, where took ferry to isle following morning) met three guys from Newcastle…no more coals to that city I guess.these days… And I thought it was bad in the US!
And Gordon Brown sold off a lot of England’s gold at low prices, just before currency depreciation.
Good clocks without compasses or sextants or calculating with IIXXVVCCC would not get them very far, I am afraid.
Contributions from all quarters made it possible. Some indigenous, some foreign inventions.
The problem with commenters such as the one I was replying to, make claim that they did it all by themselves, without bother to credit those before them who made it possible.
They fall into the same trap that the Qing emperors fell into in the late 1700s to mid 1800s….hubris born out of ignorance…..or perhaps ignorance born out of hubris????
When shown Western clocks by Jesuit priests, the Qing Emperors dismissed them, saying “We in China are the most advanced, richest, largest, most cultured civilisation in the world…..We have no need for your trinkets”……..sound familiar?
With arrogance like this, China closed its doors and closed its minds and it stagnated. A century later, British gunboats arrived and forced opium on the Qing, and they were powerless to stop them.
The Chinese have learned from this painful lesson. The question in my mind is….have the West?
Amongst other things, money laundering goes into real estate, pushing up prices, making it unaffordable in destination countries.
‘Explaining the reality of the situation’.
Just wish an author on Unz would attempt to name the names worldwide of ‘who exactly’ the people are waiting in the shadows that are owed all these trillions and trilions trillions of £€$¥ etc etc by government.
Not nearly enough talk about the shadow banksters at the very very top if you ask me and if there was more talk then they would be even more afraid of the truth getting out about how the central bank fraud of usury works in every country/continent that has a central bank.
My wager would be on the ruling monarch as the chair of the BOE and the head of the Rothschild clan always subservient,in U.K anyway,if all the never ending nonsense after Lizzy died is anything to go by.
I don’t know about that. It is the Hindians who managed to bore into Amelikan HiTech corporations, which they did NOT build up, right through to the very top and do all sorts of damages there– Musk was wise to have flushed them out as soon as he took over Twitter, now X.
https://www.livemint.com/companies/people/musk-fires-almost-all-of-twitter-s-india-staff-11667565493470.html
Not to mention the damages their sleazy politicians do while hiding in the attic of western governments…
Perhaps on the west coast of Africa up to the Cape of Good Hope this was the case.
However on the east side, trade was already flourishing for centuries.
The Austronesians and their Polynesian kin spread as far as Easter Island off the coast of Peru to Madagascar off the coast East Africa. If one looks at a map, the distances involved are truly astounding.
On the western extreme of their range, Austronesians intermarried with the Madagascans and till this day the language spoken on the island (now called the Malagasy Republic) is an Austronesian language.
The language spoken on the East Coast of Africa, or at least the lingua franca there is Swahili. It is composed of some 15% Arabic loanwords…testament of extensive contact with Arab sailors.
There are are communities of people on the coast of East Africa who claim to be descendants of shipwrecked Chinese sailors.
No, the Portuguese and Spanish did not come into a vacuum. They were eager to get a piece of lucrative trade that other sailors already told them about.
What they did have, was an improved version of firearms (originally invented by the Chinese), that enabled them to match their ambitions with military might.
There is sharing, and there is exploiting.
If the colonisers taught the “natives” how to make firearms, production technology, split the gold and silver extracted from the mines with them….then I would call that sharing.
But if the colonisers only taught their language so that the natives could be instructed with ease, taught their religion featuring a “White Saviour” so that the natives would be docile, force them to produce raw materials such as grain and cotton and minerals, while they kept the processing industries in Europe….and obliging the natives to BUY BACK the processed goods…..then that would be exploitation.
I have a different explanation for why Westerners are paying the price. And it is not about being good natured.
Western civilisation has been a victim of its own success. I wrote a reply to another poster featuring this same explanation, so I hope you will excuse me if I cut and paste:
They fall into the same trap that the Qing emperors fell into in the late 1700s to mid 1800s….hubris born out of ignorance…..or perhaps ignorance born out of hubris????
When shown Western clocks by Jesuit priests, the Qing Emperors dismissed them, saying “We in China are the most advanced, richest, largest, most cultured civilisation in the world…..We have no need for your trinkets”……..sound familiar?
With arrogance like this, China closed its doors and closed its minds and it stagnated. A century later, British gunboats arrived and forced opium on the Qing, and they were powerless to stop them.
The Chinese have learned from this painful lesson. The question in my mind is….have the West?
Having said this, I know it will not find an enthusiastic response with Western audiences. Rather they would be horrified to be compared with “lowly degenerate Chinks”, let alone Chinkies of 200 years ago.
But no matter… I have already said it. The West is in a situation that China was 2 centuries ago.
You’re describing the situation very well.
I wish things were not so, but they are …
Incredible socialist propaganda. It was the LEFT that started mass immigration to Britain. But socialists always lie, otherwise they wouldn’t be socialist.
And “experiment”? Labour in the 1980s was taken over by communists who had frozen the labor market. They made it extremely costly and difficult for businesses to fire employees. “Look, we’re saving your jobs, vote for us!” The result was that businesses also couldn’t hire employees, as they knew that when there was a downturn in their branch some years later they couldn’t fire those they had hired. So job opportunities were lost and Britain lost production of goods and services.
But that just meant the socialist state got more people to bribe with unemployment benefits. This was the typical Social Democrat system for buying votes throughout the Cold War: Freeze the job market, so you can claim you’re “saving the jobs.” Then buy off those who will inevitably be unemployed as a result.
Make them dependent on welfare through years of inactivity. These will be your voters and your protesters, as they have no jobs to keep them away from protests.
But the British were still a majority in their own country, and enough people saw through the scheme. They voted for the Tories instead. Margaret Thatcher saved the economy, and therefore won three election victories with huge margin. For this leftists like Keith Woods here hate her immensely.
Thanks to Margaret Thatcher the economy flourished. And as a revenge, the Labour socialists actually put their plan for mass immigration in print. The idea was to replace the hated British voters with immigrant voters. They actually wrote this.
And Tony Blair was their main agent, while pretending that he had ditched their Marxism. They simply chose Cultural Marxism to bring in immigrants, so they can have their economic Marxism later.
https://townhall.com/columnists/anncoulter/2015/06/10/immigration--hey-look-a-cop-yelling-at-a-black-girl-in-a-bikini-n2010910
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2504398/A-spectacular-mistake-immigration-Straw-finally-admits-Labour-messed-letting-million-East-Europeans.html
Labour MPs are so dumb they can’t even predict the probability of two coins flipping to heads:
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-19801666
https://www.unz.com/article/secure-tolerance-the-jewish-plan-to-permanently-silence-the-west/#comment-4045938
In short, Keith Woods is lying.
Thatcherism worked well for some 40 years. Pretty successful overall. It managed to offset the losses of productive capacities in Britain by creating financial markets that allowed to buy shares of profitable and productive foreign ressources. Except for the USA other countries were far behind on this strategy. The capital flow into the UK was enormous. The case for mass integration was really brought forward by Blair‘s 1st admin and continues for 25+ years. Now after decades they have to retest their approach.
“Britain and France are more irrelevant than ever” Always fun to hear Americans spit at other nations to feel superior. Americans are the ones who elected a Black president twice. Americans are the ones whose top 100 cities are majority non-Whites. Americans are the ones whose schools are filled with a majority of non-White children.
And all the anti-White propaganda came from Hollywood, for decades. After Americans were dumb enough to place zero limits on Jewish activity, at a time when nearly all European states had some restrictions, which aside from the practical effects served to show people that the Jews were an enemy.
“But muh freedom.”
Along with little things like the rule of law. China was a tyranny. All local leaders could do what they wanted with the people. The leaders could put thumbscrews on their servants to torture them for fun. And those same local leaders, if they made too much money, could be imprisoned or killed by the court who stole their money for the emperor.
They were astonished that the British in Hong Kong had laws that were equal for all, so that a powerful man could be prosecuted for killing a prostitute.
As for the opium, what a neatly blind story you have there, straight from socialist propaganda. No context as usual. First of all, the Chinese wanted to buy opium – do you seriously think the British were the sellers? LOL They sold to Chinese who sold to other Chinese.
What actually happened was this: Tea grew in China. Through no effort of their own. Tea was needed in Europe because water had to be boiled before drinking it, and boiled water is horribly tasteless. So the British started drinking tea and also exported it to the rest of Europe.
But the court of eunuchs around the emperor demanded that all payment be made in silver. And they refused to buy anything from the British, stating that they were superior and needed nothing from the outsiders.
Those court eunuchs are not “the Chinese”. The British did not have a conflict with “the Chinese”.
All the silver in Britain started pouring into China. The entire British economy was at risk.
Eventually a British ship unloaded opium in a Chinese port, and sold it to the local leaders for silver. Opium quickly became popular. And from the sale of opium the British could get their silver back.
That is why the eunuchs banned the opium trade. It wasn’t “the Chinese.” And it wasn’t out of any concern for “the people.” It was to keep the silver in China.
That is why the British fought a quick war to keep the opium trade going, and they were supported by millions of Chinese, including local rulers. Who took part in the opium trade and who loved seeing the eunuchs get beaten.
The only ones who actually opposed opium out of humanitarian concerns were the British. The resistance was in the British parliament. And that is why the British eventually banned the trade. They had smuggled out tea to grow it in India instead. Which the Chinese eunuchs should have agreed to, for the good of all, but they had refused.
And by the way, the British and other Whites forced the Chinese to abandon slavery, real and de facto. Even the Chinese Buddhist monks had slaves working their fields.
As with the Indian tribes in the Americas, the Africans, the Ottomans, the Central Asians, and more, they only gave up slavery when Whites forced them to.
But evil British, opium trade, capitalismmmm, etc.
The Chinese never abolished slavery. You don’t know what you are talking about. To many people have a very incorrect European view of China’s. 14 years ago I shared house with 2 Chinese girls in Dublin. Although they would never be allowed into the country with a refugee status, they were allowed with a student visa which they renewed on a yearly basis. The only precondition was to be studying in Ireland. 2 years ago I heard they were still in Ireland, one married an Irishmen , the other one is still studying in Ireland. The student visa thing is big business in Ireland and often it is the only way for foreigners to stay in the country. Universities in Dublin and all over Ireland make millions of these foreigners.
What they told me about China was seriously scary stuff. Having a good job and a trusted employer means working 6 days a week 12 14 16 hours no exception. When you are seriously lucky you will get some holidays but not certain. When it’s busy at work your boss without scrupules will call you to come in on Sunday also. There’s Chinese companies who don’t allow their workers to leave for months. Can you imagine that ?
Chinese are anti-altruistic. There’s camps for small people aka midgets and they are forced to do shows in circuses , wear funny clothes so others can make fun at them.
Cant argue with what he is saying. Not what the Synagogue Of Satan and the Hasbara’s wanted 👏👏
Recognizing Palestine – Mélenchon’s Victory Signals Shift Toward Palestine.
Jean-Luc Mélenchon, a leading figure in the left-wing New People’s Front alliance, has reaffirmed his pledge to recognize the State of Palestine following his coalition’s victory in the recent French general election.
https://www.palestinechronicle.com/recognizing-palestine-melenchons-victory-signals-shift-toward-palestine/
Time will tell if this is just rhetoric or they really mean it
“And all the anti-White propaganda came from Hollywood, for decades. After Americans were dumb enough to place zero limits on Jewish activity, at a time when nearly all European states had some restrictions,…”
Like what restrictions?
Europe was in the Dark Ages whilst other civilisations flourished.
1001 Inventions is an award-winning international science and cultural heritage organisation that raises awareness of the creative golden age of Arabic Science.
From the 7th century onwards, men and women of different faiths and cultures built on knowledge from ancient civilisations making breakthroughs that have left their mark on our world….
Video Link
https://www.1001inventions.com
‘Warlikeness of Europeans’
Does that also include the Welsh who you love so dearly because Wales is in Europe?.
And so what,the Europeans had the biggest mass killing guns and the biggest and fastest soldier of conquer carrying ships first and the egotists and narrcisists controlling the controllable at the time in Europe did what egotists and narrcisists do but it doesn’t mean that there aren’t just as many egotists and narrcisists in China,back then or today because there were and are!! and so quit your silly China is so great and the West is so bad nonsense.
And you saying that Europeans are warlike is about as silly as saying that the Chinese are all tree killers,so that they can make paper.
South West Water – say no more, nudge nudge wink wink, know what I mean?
‘Forced opium’
Don’t make me laugh,opium wasn’t forced on anyone in China and it was just used as a trade off by the British East India company and China for Chinese tea which the British bought back to Britain on Clipper ship after Clipper ship and at the time tea drinking was the extremely popular caffeine drug of choice in Britain and so it was essentially just a drug trade off and the Chinese could very easily have said NO but they didn’t because trade means money and the ones making all the money couldn’t have cared less about the serious opium addictions in China or the obviously far less serious caffeine addictions in Britain.
You just spread Chinese centric fake news.
Then it is as bad as I fear. The program will run differently based on the existing cultural basis. China has much more weight than India. Chinese hegemony will mean an unstoppable ice shelf of Marxist materialism, Corporate adventurism, Taoist fatalism, and Confucian authoritarianism. South Korea is what we can expect in prototype. To paraphrase La Thatcher: No, No, No, No.
I think you have to go back 30 years earlier to Churchill, the “Drunken Bum”. There was no need for a war, but he wanted one. Roosevelt’s “Lend/Lease” con job suckered Churchill into running up a massive debt and end the Ottawa Agreements for trade preferences with the Commonwealth/Empire. It was all downhill after that.
Burning down the house warmed the inhabitants well for 40 minutes.
“The 1,000 Chinese SpaceX engineers who never existed”
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.technologyreview.com/2022/09/07/1059067/chinese-spacex-engineers-linkedin-scam/amp/
Desperate attempts at seats on the lifeboat, I think.
Ballet is orders of magnitude harder and more challenging than football, soccer, gymnastics or any other mainstream sport. Dancers make no money in comparison to the black-dominated professional sports that a lot of loser, puffy white guys in the west cannot keep themselves from supporting.
And the idea that every male ballet dancer is gay is so idiotic as to defy description. In Russia the weak boys who cannot stick with ballet often end up in gymnastics or other lesser, easier pursuits. It is the same story in the UK, USA, Germany and elsewhere.
Whereas ignorant jock asshole philistines who hate anything traditional, true or beautiful are a dime a dozen. As if vulgarity, ignorance and a cult-like devotion to corporate pickups and tv football are the apex of culture and masculinity.
Biden and Trump are the faggy circus seals putting on a show to please their big Zionist daddy, not male ballet dancers who make $38K a year and live with multiple roommates to pursue their art. But keep on punching down if it gives you that heady, self-righteous Reagan-Thatcher era buzz.
“Not nearly enough talk about the shadow banksters at the very very top if you ask me…”
That’s because these motherfuckers don’t know who they truly are but you’re on the right path by naming the Rothschilds and Company…
Imagine on the eve of the Battle of Waterloo in which Napoleon Bornaparte was defeated by the British, rendering it the remaining sole superpower of the then world.
Meanwhile, in the preceding few years or a few decades, the old man Rothschilds had been busy setting up his boys is five different cities of Europe, including London, a de facto capital of the world, where Nathan Rothschilds, the one believed to be the smartest was sent. Now, up to that time most of the world’s assets were not monetized like they’re today but the British were on their way through the London bourse. And the British wealth was displayed for all to see on the stock market.
Back to the war: things weren’t going smoothly as had been expected and there was panic in the market and assets were being sold off for pennies on the pound. Step in Nathan and the collective cash of the money changers across Europe to buy up what was being dumped. And with the control of the bulk of the shares, Rothschilds family had for the first time became the effective masters of the world and thereafter, all subsequent British wars and colonization was done on the behalf of the bankers, which has made them immensely wealthy (there isn’t a world in any language to describe the amount of wealth) to the point of all modern governments being beholden to them.
And don’t let anyone bullshit you into thinking that that takeover of the London market has nothing to do with that ability to print, lend and control money of the world central banks today… it has been compounding all through the last few centuries to the detriment of the humanity.
Maybe it’s only one family or a dozen or so families but it’s definitely not in the hands of non Rothschilds entities… we’re all merely borrowers.
So the kikes and their anglo lackeys want to try and steal everything huh. The Russians and Chinese will stop their rape and rapine ways. Also people think their so smart. No their just thieves, clever but not smart.
It goes back further … Britain was already bankrupt by 1908 or so;
the system relied on the two-power (three is better) standard i.e. naval
superiority over the next two powers combined, which became untenable
the moment they lost manufacturing superiority;
the difference to the US is they religiously clung to the gold standard i.e.
they never went that far underwater.
Turn around is fair play I guess. The sand-nigger semite jew and other asiatic sand-niggers and now niggers rule over you and your kind in your own lands where these alien outlanders aren’t from. Just like your European forefathers ruled over these backward peoples in their lands. Now what happened after WWII? The 3rd worlders with the aid and support of the jews fought wars of liberation from their colonial masters. Well I say turn around is fair play and you guys wage war against these alien invading hordes and kick them the fuck out of your country. And that includes the jews. Of course the jews will make a B-line right to America. Anywhere Europeans are the kike will go. Learn your history.
London is no longer a British City
While this article is great I think it fails to investigate the influence of the Communist Party and Marxists in attempting to destroy the industrial base of Britain so as to achieve… revolution? Or Neoliberalism?
The existing socialist mindset of most Labour people was a fair days work for a fair day’s pay. These were people that were socially conservative and just wanted to partake in a bit of the wealth they were working hard to create.
Enter the Socialist Workers Party led by Tony Cliff aka Yigael Glückstein direct from upper class Israel. The SWP always had a load of cash to finance placards, newspapers, events… Enter the Workers Revolutionary Party WRP, the Trotskyist IMG who infiltrated “cadre” into places like Ford and Vauxhall to professionally stir up trouble. In effect the union movement had been taken over by Jewish extremism. But what did they really want? They wanted to prepare the ground for a neoliberal takeover, they wanted things to get so bad with events like the Winter of Discontent that getting back to the real business of Jewish financial control could occur. All these juicy assets like British Rail and Gas and Electricity could be gobbled up at firesale prices – just as they did in Russia.
The UK has been denationalised by decades of mass-immigration and cultural leftism, and has become the prime example of “anarcho-tyranny”, where the state punishes minor offences and acts of dissent against the liberal consensus with extreme force, while serious crime runs out of control in major cities.
I say:
ANARCHO-TYRANNY IN THE USA
The JEW/WASP Ruling Class of the American Empire is using ANARCHO-TYRANNY to stay in power.
The JEW/WASP Ruling Class of the American Empire uses open borders mass immigration and open borders mass illegal alien invasions to create anarchy.
The JEW/WASP Ruling Class of the American Empire is cracking down on pro-peace, anti-war Americans because JEWS ORGANIZED GLOBALLY(JOG) is more than happy to use tyranny to attack and destroy those who would thwart their will.
ANARCHO-TYRANNY defintion:
Criminalize the European Christian ancestral core of the United States while allowing foreigners and non-Whites and non-Christians to do whatever the hell they feel like. Use the ensuing chaos to bring about totalitarianism directed at White Core Americans to prevent them from retaliating against the plutocrats and others who benefit from the loss of cultural cohesion and societal breakdown.
Sam Francis and others have suggested that the push for race replacement or WHITE GENOCIDE is because the ruling class wants to create conditions of political mayhem and civilizational mayhem that can only be governed by a centralized managerial ruling class that will concentrate all governmental power.
Sam Francis suggested that the managerial state is using mass immigration as a demographic weapon to create the conditions where political power is completely centralized and dissent is not tolerated.
Sam Francis was getting at the Hobbesian Leviathan scenario where a multicultural jurisdiction requires brute concentrated force to keep it together because the inherent ethnic antagonisms are so severe.
ANARCHO-TYRANNY IS KILLING ENGLAND AND THE USA
God Bless The Departed Sam Francis and CHRONICLES MAGAZINE!
THE AMERICAN EMPIRE’S EVIL, TREASONOUS AND DEMONIC RULING CLASS IS USING ANARCHO-TYRANNY TO ATTACK WHITE CORE AMERICA
Sam Francis on ANARCHO-TYRANNY from a 1993 speech(Chronicles Magazine 1994):
https://chroniclesmagazine.org/view/anarcho-tyranny-u-s-a/
The international jews, who were the real winners of WWII, are deliberately killing western societies adjudicating their “never again” pogrom. Mass foreign immigration destroyed the native demographics, and de-industrialization has destroyed their economy, all made possible by jewish cultural psyops, which has destroyed their minds.
Psyops is worse than carpet bombing, as we see, victims of psyops carpet bomb themselves, and call it progress.
My ancestors go back to Nottingham – – Yes, Sherwood Forest! – – where there were no rentiers, we would have shot them with our longbows, so I feel I have a right to say something here. I would like to give a shout-out to Samantha Mrs. Cameron. She did her part for manufactured stuff. She was named the best accessories designer in the UK and she went on to found a line of women’s fashionwear. Yes, she also did the first lady thing of charitable causes, but my point is she did a lot for “stuff.”
Hahaha, very funny. British economy was and had always been based on “rentier capitalism.” Have people ever wondered why should the “colonies provided the raw materials and markets for British manufacturing,” as the author states? Did the colonies had any choice? Did they sell the raw materials at fair price? The so-called “entrepreneurship” means enterprising in making use of the British military and violence to find ways to exploit the world, through slavery, genocides, wars, drug trade, bribing every corrupted and traitors to squeeze the last teal of silver from Qing, from ROC and from all the colonies around the world. Why do you think the late comers in the colonial games like US, Germany and Japan were hell-bent wanting to break the colonial empires and their systems – if not because the colonies provided indisputable advantages to British rentier economy? Why didn’t British willing to give up Hong Kong, until the last second in 1997, if the city didn’t provide any return to London?
The so-called “industrial revolution” was never about industrial nor technical revolution or invention. It was a revolution in international “laws”, in global rules and orders, a.k.a. globalization, in “free trade”, in blatant stealing of intellectual properties, etc, all pioneered by the Europeans. For example, the latest research by Chinese scholars reveals that lots of Newton’s “inventions” and Principia were copied from Chinese and others.
Steam power was known to Chinese long ago. The Chinese couldn’t exploit the power because its market was fully employed and saturated, and they didn’t go around conquering and colonizing others for new markets and raw materials. The British, however didn’t have those type of moral constraints and civilizational awareness – because “greed is good” and white people “was superior.” So it was fully “justifiable” and natural for them to spread their systems, religion and knowledge to those shithole countries.
If the British and Europeans could use forces to enter other countries, what’s wrong for others to migrate back to their former colonizers, PEACEFULLY, at least to enjoy the remnants of the exploits? If the British is truly people of entrepreneurialism, fair trade, and inventors, go ahead to start the rejuvenation through their own internal revolutions and renaissance, like what Chinese was doing 100 years ago. At least Chinese is not actively doing anything to stop the British, like what the British ancestors had done to others. But I am very confident 100 years from now, the little Britain will remain little, because they are just a bunch of robbers, thieves and pirates.
A connection must be made between that filthy HAG MUTANT RAT WHORE GLOBALIZER TART Margaret Thatcher and the high cost of housing in England and Affordable Family Formation and monetary policy and mass legal immigration and mass illegal immigration and greedy geezer genetic mutants attacking the young through inter-generational violence of a disgusting sort.
That damn globalizer tart Margaret Thatcher set in motion a vicious and disgusting attack on the ability of future English people to be able to enjoy AFFORDABLE FAMILY FORMATION and the Limey geezers cheered it on because some Limeys of a certain generation were able to buy his or her council house on the cheap and monetary policy and immigration policy ballooned the frigging Hell out of the value, thereby doing direct and deliberate harm to the younger people who now have to face massive increases in housing costs due to that globalizer tart Thatcher and, in part, the damn greedy Limey geezer bastards!
Curses for this dead globalizer tart Margaret Thatcher and her frigging Tory Party and their efforts to crush the young by massively inflating the cost of housing for young English people.
Privatization And Plutocracy Go Perfect Together — Maggie Thatcher Was A Whore For The Globalizer Plutocrat Oligarchs!
Thatcher and Reagan and Blair and Clinton all pushed privatization, globalization, financialization, mass immigration, multicultural mayhem and open borders.
Thatcher and Reagan and Blair and Clinton were and are SPITEFUL MUTANT politician whores who did the bidding of the JEW/WASP Ruling Class of the American Empire and the JEW/ENGLISH Ruling Class of England.
Maggy Harridan Haggy Thatcher Pushed Financialization, Privatization, Central Banker Shysterism And TREASONOUS GLOBALIZER PLUTOCRAT OLIGARCH GREED, GREED, GREED.
Privatization And Plutocracy Go Perfect Together; and that bought and paid for politician rat whore Maggie Thatcher was more than happy to put the Privatization/Plutocracy jigsaw puzzle together.
MAGGY THE SPITEFUL MUTANT POLITICIAN RAT WHORE TART THATCHER IS ROTTING AND ROASTING IN THE HOTTEST PITS OF FIERY HELL!
THE TORY POLITICAL PARTY MUST BE TERMINATED WITH EXTREME PREJUDICE!
IMMIGRATION MORATORIUM NOW
DEPORT ALL ILLEGAL ALIEN INVADERS NOW
RULING CLASS POLITICAL DECAPITATION IS THE HEROIC DUTY OF THE AGE
The Scots are scum, or should I say, shite.
What you said is true of the time, when China was rotten with corruption. Please note that China too had laws that under better administration would have functioned better.
But one must be careful to compare apple to apple. One must compare 2 systems when they both function well/healthy, or when they are both in a corrupted state. Once cannot compare a rotten one with a healthy one.
Britain at that stage was in a stage in the cycle when it was relatively healthy. Where although there was oligarchic/monarchic rule, the good outweighed the bad, and Britain as a whole prospered. To put things in a better perspective, we should compare it to Britain of today…
As for the other parts of what you wrote, I must say I cannot agree with most of them.
But my post gets overlong.
LOL, you are using words with such imprecision that they are meaningless.
First you begin with Slavery, then you talk about work contracts/culture? Do you equate the two?
China has a different work environment from the West. So do the Japanese and Koreans. You should go do some research on the work culture on the other two before you write to me about Chinese slavery.
Besides, I retired at 45. Shall I consider YOU or any Irishman, or Englishman who still works a full time job a SLAVE? That would be irrational and downright silly, correct?
One of the things that the world respects the West for, was for the rationality and logic that it ONCE practised. I hope you will not disappoint us, I hope you will reply with a more rational, considered and precise reply than you have thus far.
@ Notsofast and Jim H and others of similar awareness:
Both of you are bang on! As well others that made comments along the same lines are also awake!
While I was reading the article, I found the same consequences / outcomes or results occurring
in Canada from after 9/11. Interestingly, Jim H like myself would put the blame on all this on
the Jew / Khazarian Mafia and the by ZOG!
Also even in Canada, the local Police Forces / Services are toothless when immigrants commit
crimes against whites.
There’s no such thing as pro-Jewish opposition to non-European immigration into white countries. Anybody who is pro-Jewish or anti-anti-semite supports the end of white nations.
We need to exclude those who do not at least tacitly acknowledge that there are no Jew-aligned candidates that can actually be on our side.
It’s sad and tragic that in the 21st century most people still canot discern that politics and elections are theatre for public consumption.
Those who researched history, not the type of history one gets in schools and universities, but told by honest revisionists, know that politics and political parties are all controlled at the top by the same people: judeo/masonry.
“Republics” are nations controlled at the top by judeo/masonry, and elections serve to keep people distracted and give them the illusion of participations.
Several nation’s leaders have warned about the existence of what some call an “invisible government”, others call it “hidden hand” and other “the elite” or “globalists”, when in reality their name is international jewish bankers and jewry in general.
= Benjamin Disraeli, first jewish british prime minister, in his novel “Coningsby”, 1844: “The world is governed by people entirely different from the ones imagined by those who are unable to see behind the scenes. The public does not realize that in all the conflicts within nations and in the conflicts between nations there are, besides the people apparently responsible for them, hidden agitators who with their selfish plans make these conflicts unavoidable… There are moments when the history of empires only nominally exists, and when there is nothing really alive but the sects hidden within them… Governments do not govern, but merely control the machinery of government, being themselves controlled by the hidden hand.”
– “… that mysterious russian diplomacy which so alarms western Europe is organised and principally carried on by jews; that mighty revolution which is at this moment preparing in Germany, and which will be, in fact, a second and greater reformation, and of which so little is as yet known in England, is entirely developing under the auspices of jews.”
= David Lloyd George, british prime minister, ‘New Britain’ magazine, june 1934: “Great Britain is a slave under the international financial powers.”
= Franklin D. Roosevelt, US president in a letter to an associate, 21st November 1933: “The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the large centers has owned the government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson.”
= Theodore Roosevelt, former US president, “The progressive covenant with the people”, 1912: “Behind the ostensible government sits enthroned an invisible government owning no allegiance and acknowledged no responsibility to the people. To destroy this invisible government, to befoul this unholy alliance between corrupt business and corrupt politics is the first task of statesmanship.”
= Clement Atlee, UK prime minister: “Over and over again we have seen that there is another power than that which has its seat at Westminster. The City of London, a convenient term for a collection of financial interests, is able to assert itself against the government of the country. Those who control money can pursue a policy at home and abroad contrary to that which is being decided by the people.”
= Woodrow Wilson, former US president, “The New Freedom”: “I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is privately concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men… We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated, governments in the civilized world – no longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and the duress of small groups of dominant men.”
= Lord Hewart, Lord Chief Justice of England, “The New Despotism”, 1929: “A mass of evidence establishes the fact that there is in existence a persistent and well-contrived system, intending to produce, and in practice producing, a despotic power which at one and the same time places government departments beyond the sovereignty of parliament and beyond the jurisdiction of the courts.”
= Jean Izoulet, member of the Jewish Alliance Israelite Universelle, 1931: “The meaning of the history of the last century is that today 300 jewish financers, all Masters of Lodges, rule the world.”
= Walter Rathenau, jewish banker of the german keiser, Wiener Freie Presse, 24th december 1912: “Three hundred men, each of whom knows all the others, govern the fate of the european continent, and they elect their successor from their entourage.”
= John Francis Hylan, Mayor of New York City, quoted in New York Times, speaking in Chicago, 26th march 1922: “The warning of Theodore Roosevelt has much timelines today, for the real menace of our republic is this invisible government which like a giant octopus sprawls its slimy length over city, state and nation. The little coterie of powerful international bankers virtually run the US government for their own selfish purposes. They practically control both parties… [and] control the majority of the newspapers and magazines in this country. They use the columns of these papers to club into submission or drive out of office public officials who refuse to do the bidding of the powerful corrupt cliques which compose the invisible government. Like the octopus of real life, it operates under cover of a self-created screen. It seizes in its long and powerful tentacles our executive officers, our legislative bodies, our schools, our courts, our newspapers and every agency created for the public protection…”
= James Madison, US statesman, diplomat, philosopher and founding father: “History records that the money changers [jewish bankers] have used every form of abuse, intrigue, deceit and violent means possible to maintain their control over governments by controlling money and its issuance.”
I could paste a lot more quotes here, but I’m sure you guys, if you follow this website, you’re smart people… so you get the picture, yes?
The English killed tens of millions in India alone. That’s ‘entrepreneurship’, red in tooth and claw, at its most naked. I dream that, when the UK is an even more open sewer than now, and India has, one hopes, grown to its real potential, that the Indians will extract trillions in reparations from the Anglo parasite castes.
The Western ‘life-boat’ makes Titanic, today, look sea-worthy. It’s back to the pre-HMS Birkenhead days-‘Every man for himself’. And the Devil take the hindmost. I’m afraid that Australia is quintessentially ‘hindmost’. Expendable, like all Uncle Satan’s minions. ‘South Irian’ as will be.
His Holiness—the Dalai Lama- is also residing in London counting his funds—the gold removed from Tibet which entered India without paying customs duties now stored in London—the looting was in 1951 equivalent to 40 to 100 million –today it is massive.
Contrary to what the Western media states–1n 1951 Tibet had 95% poverty and 97% illiteracy and it was a tough theocracy–those monks were not Christian monastic types but bullies carrying riding crops up their sleeves to punish who they might encounter–the peasants suffered from inherited debt going back generations.
There’s no bigot like a dumb-fuck Catholic. We had a party of the type, the DLP, for years, and they still infest the ALP regime and scab unions like the AWU. Your mendacious and psychopathic invention and confabulation is old, old, hat. That Sinophobic niche was filled to overflowing long ago.
India was a very rich country prior to being colonized and stripped- agree. China likewise had Japan- England-France- Holland – Germany– Portugal- Spain- carving up their estates in China–.
Better to derecognize Satan’s toilet since
it will be but a smoldering ash by Easter.
Palestine will rise. A new W. Asia begins.
USA, dead as road kill, stuck with rubbish.
Houthies claim North America and ‘Great’ Britain
Yid survivors housed with other pests and vermin.
5ds
Actually “Lebensraum”…If only it were Liebesraum!
Strong on assertions, weak on evidence. Typically Jewish argument.
Your lack of evidence and ignorance of actual facts as compiled by the British themselves is a strong signal you’re a Jew.
Ermm… do you know what knispel is slang for in German?
Hahaha…. You are NOT the only one who thinks so:
Let us see, GDP of South Korea is US$1.7 trillions, population is about 50 millions (1/30th of China’s, roughly). China being another South Korea would make a per capita GDP for China 1/30th of South Korea’s, which is about US$3,200.–.
Even if we say that an average Chinese ought to be as intelligent and as competent as an average South Korean, which is reasonable, we would still expect the following:
1) South Korea has 0 (zero) number of space stations. So, China should have 0 x 30 = 0 space station.
2) South Korea brought back lunar soil to Earth 0 times. So, China should have brought back lunar soil to earth 0 x 30 = 0 times,
3) South Korea sent probes and rovers to Mar 0 times. So, China should have sent probes and rovers to Mars 0 x 30 = 0 times.
Etc, etc.
So, you can see the logic. 😀
Of course it had to be the Jew to tell Britons they no longer had a choice in their own governance. No matter who they voted for, they would get Thatcherism when it came to their nation’s economy. However, “they” are all Blairites when it comes to immigration. No matter what party Britons vote for, and on the verge of a massive of wave of job destruction due to AI, they get maximal immigration by the least desirable groups the planet has to offer.
Every country that harbors Jews is the moronic frog that agrees to carry a scorpion across a stream on his back and gets stung halfway there.
Chinese don’t need to be SpaceX engineers:
https://www.unz.com/article/the-great-british-betrayal/#comment-6651583
When I was a kid, in the 1960’s, I went to a public (i.e. private) school in the Midlands. Many of my contemporaries had parents who owned factories that made real things.
I remember when the first non-White kid came to school. He was a few years younger than me. He was a Sikh and his name was Singh. It must have been really weird for him to be alone in a school with 599 White boys.
Jewish kids were treated like shit. I, born in Egypt, was shocked at the anti-Semitism of British kids. In a previous school, an English boy would go at night over to the bed of a Jewish kid and fart in his face – really close up. At the end of the school year, they tied this boy to the radiators running along the ceiling so that he missed the school’s reserved train to London.
Now, the boot is firmly on the other foot.
Holocaust Memorial Evening
The kids are given lessons on the “Holocaust”. I am sure the word “Palestine” might lead to expulsion.
It will be interesting to watch how this plays out in the UK. The best hope is that the Muslims will displace the Jews. I gave up on the ethnic British a long time ago. A bunch of sissies.
I remember having read something about working for the rising Tech companies in Silicon Valley, California, in the late 1990’s. The employees lived, ate, washed, played, etc– all inside the company campuses with everything provided for them. Maybe, it was like working for Huawei, Shenzhen, today?!!
Exactly!
You bring to mind members of their revered military..they live the vast majority of their time in military setting and their contracts last typically 8 years…..His Catholic Holiness should define them as “slaves” too.
Their ability to cherry pick facts, and arrange them in such a ludicrous ways in order to reinforce their delusional opinion………never fails to astound me.
If you wagered that the British monarch is at the very top, you would’ve done your dough. You’re not even close.
As for the Rothschilds being ‘subservient’, you have to be joking.
With a net worth well into FOURTEEN FIGURES all on their own, the Rothschilds are accountable to no one.
The King of England is a mere figurehead that takes his orders from the Zionist Usury Banking Cartel (aka ZOG), who operate out of the City of London.
And if you’re wondering who those at the head of ZOG’s table are, no prizes for guessing that they’re ALL Malignant Talmudic Jews.
Larry Romanoff covered it pretty well in an article he posted in UR a year or more ago.
The following are those that represent the major players amongst the ‘Old Money’ Jewish dynastic families:
Added to that are the ‘New Money’ Jewish dynastic families around the world. (The following are just a small sampling of those from North America alone):
Adelson (Las Vegas casino empire), Crown family (controlling shareholders in General Dynamics), Bronfmans, Pritzkers, Soros, Lauder family (Ronald Lauder is the heir the Estee Lauder Cosmetic empire and President of the World Jewish Congress) etc.
The combined net worth of the ‘New Money’ Jewish miscreants may well be in the trillions, but it is dwarfed by the net worth of the Old Money families which amounts to multiples of U.S GDP.
So there it is, now you know what cabal of depraved satanic ritual child sacrificing misfits controls the entirety of the western financial system, controls every western politician of note, controls the IMF, BIS, World Bank, the SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication) international payments system, controls western academia and the western MSM, controls all the major western health bureaucracies (hence its ability to foist the Covid Psyop and mandate those deadly vaccines on us).
So Nagas-DeathSpiral, does that give you some inkling as to who is calling the shots?
Keith Woods is a genius. Great article.
Though I have one quibble: I think no-one has ever gotten to the bottom of the grooming gangs scandal. Why were the police protecting the gangs? Were they afraid of appearing racist? The UK prison system is full of Muslims; Tommy Robinson can attest to that, having done time with them.
Who has the power to slap a D-notice on reporting about the gangs?
I think the answer lies in the customers. They were to be found in Whitehall, in the House of Commons, and the House of Lords. Here we need to bring up Lord Janner, Labour peer, and one-time leader of Britain’s Board of Jewish Deputies- literally the most important Jew in the land. He was charged with being a serial rapist of underage, trafficked girls. He evaded prosecution by pleading advanced age and poor health.
How many others DIDN’T get caught?
Freudian slip
Should be: “China being another South Korea would make a per capita GDP for China 1/30th of South Korea’s, which is about US$1,000.–.”
‘So there it is now you know what controls the entirety of the western financial system’
I knew that already thanks and if you go back and read what i said properly you would perhaps notice that i mentioned something about a bigger picture than just ‘western’ or does only western count in your smaller picture view?.
And seeing how you cant prove that the ruling U.K monarch isn’t the real ruler and chair of the BOE i most certainly didn’t lose my dough.
Also your hacking skills are quite impressive if you are able to see what a certain Rothschild has in their bank account,like you must have to know the 14 digit worth at the top of their clan and so go on tell us all what King Charles has in the bank,as i am sure a few here would dearly love to know to do a comparison test but please do consider all the considerably large Duchy estate King Charles owns,as that may really suprise you.
Accuses author of relying “on prejudicies to explain facts.”
Next paragraph immediately declares, “Europe was a basically a feudal disease-ridden backwater before colonialism” and that it’s “returning to its roots.”
…I mean, what more is there to say?
Oh, what a bunch of nonsense. The Chinese didn’t exploit their large technical advantages, gained through superior ingenuity, because they were too good and moral to? Yeah right! The British “stole” the Chinese, and others’, “intellectual property”? As though their was such a concept as intellectual property, copyright and patent law. This is silliness, invented here to demonize the Brits, and Europeans, developing technological exploration and exploitation interests. The Brits “stole it all”, ’cause they’re bad! Come on!
Here’s what happened, completely roughly, generally, but at least slightly realistically. There was a lot of technical knowledge laying around, basically known in some ways, but mostly unexploited. The Europeans, in their explorations phase, returned with quite a bit. They began using it, then began building on the discoveries and using those. No good, no bad, morally, no “stealing” of proprietary knowledge, at all. Your desire to condemn Europeans, especially Brits, is too transparent, your twisting of history, false.
The culture of South Korea is what we can expect in prototype.
By life-boat, I just mean money. I imagine as ministers of an abandoned outpost, they are desperate to be carried back upstream home.
Why are Chinese millionaires leaving China? Why do they send their school-age children abroad?
Have you ever watched that movie?
I used one “Billy Elliot” as an example (in ballet) to point to the destitute of the spitful labour reforms leaving everyone choiceless out in the cold and not to put down ballet, which I watch on TV once a year (as foreplay to the New Years Concert in Vienna, which was the traditional event to support the Wehrmacht).
I actually encouraged one of my girls to train in ballet…
Otherwise I neither watch nor support any sports.
(My wife was a international sportswoman and member of an East German national team, if that helps you executing me). (I still exercise myself).
A survey of professional ballet dancers in 1997 revealed that they themselves believed that two out of three men in dance companies overall were sodomites, while they considered half of the men in their own companies to be sodomites.
Nagasaki-DeathSpiral writes:
The net worth of the British monarch has been calculated to a reasonably accurate degree (I don’t have the exact number at my fingertips but it’s in the tens of billions £ Sterling).
You can run that through a search engine and establish it yourself.
Meanwhile, the financial wherewithal of the Rothschilds is quite a bit trickier, seeing as all sorts of chicanery, shell companies and smoke and mirrors is employed to hide their assets.
BUT, even if we assume the figure at the extreme low end of estimates, the following comparison will suffice to give you some idea of how obscenely rich the Rottenchilds are:
At various times, the following four individuals where at or near to being the richest men in the world: Elon Musk, Bill Gates , Jeff Bezos, Warren Buffett.
Got it now Nagasaki?
1. Millionaires like to spread their eggs into different baskets…whatever the nationality.
Here in Singapore, we have a bunch of American millionaires, Indonesian millionaires, Chinese millionaires, Indian millionaires…. all trying to move their money to a LOW TAX jurisdiction.
2. China is socialist with an explicit policy of Common Prosperity…”Everybody gets rich”
Selfish millionaires don’t like that. They would rather they get rich at the expense of everybody else. So they move their money out of China where it cannot “prosper the commoners”.
China has a very competitive education system. Generally only the smartest kids can make it into the top Chinese universities.
When rich parents have stupid kids, rather than the embarrassment of sending them to a second rate Chinese university, they send them abroad. This way they can at least boast that they are rich enough to do so.
Of course, the exception to this are the super bright ones who go abroad to top rated Ivy League type schools.
So yeah, in general when you see Chinese kids in normal US universities….these are NOT the cream of the Chinese crop.
China is not alone in this. The same phenomenon happens in many Asian/Confucian countries.
Here in Singapore, a standard advice a parent would give his child is “Try to get into a local university first. If you can’t make it here, then you can go overseas. This way nobody will think you can’t make it here. ……
After you have done your basic degree in Singapore, then you can do your post graduate anywhere you please, and no one will THINK ANY LESS OF YOU”.
Hmmm, I doubt if you liked these answers.
‘Got it now Nagasaki?’
Au contraire Troof Fairy because you haven’t proven anything with your childlike and laughable search engine style ‘proof’ that is mere theory without any proof and i would suggest that you try a little harder honing those bank acc hacking skills of yours,or alternatively if that fails you could try waving your Troof Fairy wand in the air and turn yourself into a fly so that you can buzz off and be on the wall of those secret Bank of England board meetings to see who sits at the head of the table and if you do please do come back and tell us the troof,er i mean truth.
And honestly did no one ever tell you not to believe everything you read online?.
Come on now troofy,if you want to be known as truth you will most certainly need to get your act together.
culture:
the way of life, especially the general customs and beliefs, of a particular group of people at a particular time
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/culture
If Korean culture is what you expect China/Chinese to follow, then you are expecting the Chinese to behave and act the way that Koreans do.
Hence,
https://www.unz.com/article/the-great-british-betrayal/#comment-6651583
In conversation one notices the texture, if you will, of someone’s mind. I have met some young Chinese people, and their minds are wound tight, like the springs of a clock. The pressure they suffer must be tremendous. Every once in a while, one comes across articles about Chinese men and women, some highly educated, going postal and settling their differences with meat cleavers. Decapitated professors, employers, lovers, neighbors.
I have no strong reaction to what you have written. My only thought, for the moment, is that I would not like to be consumed by China’s particular brand of damnation, the urgent running towards — what exactly? How wonderful for China to catch up to the West so quickly, a West already out of West to conquer.
At the edge of the world, it is best not to jostle but queue and be quiet, perhaps turn back. I doubt the Chinese tourists will have the presence of mind to arrest their progress, to leave unsatisfied, to disband disappointed, to return unfulfilled.
So on we all go. Over the edge of the world.
Yes, I am aware this is how you think. Top marks. You’ve got me dead to rights, skewered by your inexorable logic.
Please elaborate on that statement.
The below video of a talk given by my friend Justin Walker who’s uncle was a director at the Bank Of England explains a fair bit…
Video Link
Thanks for the video, mate.
Yeah, we’re on the same page as I’ve known these issues since about 2013… I’ve got all those quotes and a lot more because one thing I’ve been doing since 2013 is to collect as many quotes possible and save them in different files, each file about a specific issue.
John Walker doesn’t say who are the guys on the very top of the power pyramid, he only mentions a few international [some secret] organizations and banks.
I like to call things by their names, so it’s the international jewish bankers and jewry who are behind the world conspiracy for 500 years now… they’re the only people on earth having a ‘great plan’ to establish a global dictatorship, which they call a “Universal Republic”.
= Rabbi Abraham Isaac Cohen Kook [1919-1935], Greater Israel champion, End Times cultist, Chief Ashkenaz Rabbi for British Mandate Palestine: “The truth concerning the land is revealed in Cabala. Jewish mysticism [cabala] militates for life in the Land of Israel. Rationalistic approaches to Judaism place no special value on the Land of Israel. In wars, national characters crystalize. Israel, as the universal reflection of mankind, benefits thereby. The heels of Messiah follow upon World Conflageration… At the hour of the downfall of western civilization, Israel is called upon to fulfill its divine mission by providing the spiritual basis for a New World Order.”
= Bernard Baruch, letter to Karl Marx, 1888: “The jewish people taken collectively will be its own Messiah. His reign over the universe will be obtained by the unification of the human race and through the elimination of frontiers. A universal republic will come into being in which the sons of Israel will become the directing element, will be all of the same race and the same traditional culture without, however, forming another nationality, and will be without contradiction the leading element in all parts, particularly if it is successful in laving upon the masses of workers a permanent leadership by some jews. The governments of peoples all pass with the formation of the universal republic effortlessly into the hands of the israelites in favour of the victory of the proletariat. The personal property of the rulers will be able to be suppressed by the rulers of the jewish race who will everywhere govern the property of the peoples. The promise of the Talmud will be fulfilled that when the time of the Messiah has come, the jews will have the goods of all peoples of the world in their possession.”
= Nahum Goldman, founder of World Jewish Congress, “The German War: The Spirit of Militarism”, 1915:
– “The historical mission of our world revolution is to rearrange a new culture of humanity to replace the previous social system. This conversion and re-organization of global society requires two essential steps: firstly, the destruction of the old established order, secondly, design and imposition of the new order. The first stage requires elimination of all frontier borders, nationhood and culture, public policy ethical barriers and social definitions, only then can the destroyed old system elements be replaced by the imposed system elements of our new order. The first task of our world revolution is destruction. All social strata and social formations created by traditional society must be annihilated, individual men and women must be uprooted from their ancestral environment, torn out of their native milieus, no tradition of any type shall be permitted to remain as sacrosanct, traditional social norms must only be viewed as a disease to be eradicated, the ruling dictum of the new order is; nothing is good so everything must be criticized and abolished, everything that was, must be gone… After destruction of the old order, construction of the new order is a larger and more difficult task. We will have torn out the old limbs from their ancient roots in deep layers, social norms will be lying disorganized and anarchic so they must be blocked against new cultural forms and social categories naturally re-emerging. The general masses will have been first persuaded to join as equals in the first task of destroying their own traditional society and economic culture, but then the new order must be forcibly established through people again being divided and differentiated only in accordance with the new pyramidal hierarchical system of our imposed global monolithic new world order.”
= Rabbi Harry Waton, “A Program for the Jews and Humanity”, 1939: “It is not an accident that judaism gave birth to marxism and it is not an accident that the jews readily took up marxism; all this was in perfect accord with the progress of judaism and the jews. The jews should realize that Jehovah no longer dwells in Heaven, but he dwells in us right here on earth; we must no longer look up to Jehovah as above us and outside us, but we must see him right within us [pag.148])… Since the jews are the highest and most cultured people on earth, the jews have the right to subordinate to themselves the rest of mankind and to be masters over the whole earth. Now, indeed, this is the historic destiny of the jews (pag,99)… Judaism is communism, internationalism, the universal brotherhood of man, the emancipation of the working class and the human society. It is with these spiritual weapons that the jews will conquer the world and the human race.”
= Dr Oscar Levy, german jewish physician and author, “L’Anti-Semitism” pag 350: “There is scarcely an event in modern Europe that cannot be traced back to the jews… Jewish elements provide the driving force for both capitalism and communism, for the material as well the spiritual ruin of this world.”
– “The jew is not satisfied with de-christianizing, he judaizes, he destroys catholic or protestant faith, he provokes indifference but he imposes his idea of the world, of morals and of life upon those whose faith he ruins; he works at his age-old task, the annihilation of the religion of Christ.”
= Marcus Eli Ravage, on New York tribune + Century Magazine, feb 1928: “We are the founders and leading adherents of capitalism and chief perpetrators of the rebellion against capitalism… You accuse us of stirring up revolution in Moscow. Suppose we admit the charge? What of it?… You make such noise and fury about undue jewish influence in your theatres and movie palaces. Very good: granted your complain is well founded. But what is that compared to our staggering influence in your churches, schools, your laws and government and the very thoughts you think… We conquered you as no empire of yours ever subjugated Africa or Asia.”
= London Jewish World, of february 9th, 1883: “The great ideal of judaism is that the whole world shall be imbued with jewish teachings, and that in a universal brotherhood of nations, a Greater Judaism, in fact, all the separate races and religions shall disappear.”
= The Jewish Chronicle, march 26th, 1937:
– “We jews, claim we possess universal religion, a faith whose foundations we believe will one day be accepted by all mankind. It is by means of freemasonry that the jew, who is a jew by birth and race, will rule the universe, with the crowd on his head, and the kingdom of the world at his feet.”
= David Ben Gurion, Israel prime minister, “Magazine Look”, 1962: “Western and eastern Europe will become a federation of autonomous states having a socialist and democratic regime – with the exception of USSR – as a federated eurasian state… All continents will become united in a world alliance at whose disposal will be an international police force. All armies will be abolished, and there will be no more war. In Jerusalem the United Nations will build a shrine of the prophets to serve the federated union of all continents; this will be the seat of the Supreme Court of Mankind to settle all controversies among the federated continents, as prophecized by Isaiah.”
= Ariel Sharon, jewish general, politician and former prime minister of Israel: “With the exception of the USSR, all other continents will become united in a world alliance at whose disposal will be an international police force. All armies will be abolished and there will be no more wars. In Jerusalem, the United Nations will build a shrine of the prophets to serve the federated union of all continents; this will be the seat of the supreme court of mankind, to settle all controversies among the federated continents, as prophecised by Isaiah…”
= Menachem Begin, Israel prime minister, Nobel Peace Prize winner [sic], reported by Amnon Kapeliouk, “Begin and the ‘Beasts’”, New Statesman, june 25, 1982: “Our race is the master race. We are divine gods on this planet. We are as different from the inferior races as they are from insects. In fact, compared to our race, other races are beasts and animals, cattle at best. The other races are considered as human excrement. Our destiny is to rule over the inferior races. Our earthly kingdom will be ruled by our leader with a rod of iron. The masses will lick our feet and serve us as our slaves.”
= Theodore Herlz, father of zionism, “The Jewish State”: “The wealthy jews control the world in their hands lies the fate of government and nations. They set governments one against the other and by their decree, governments make peace when the wealthy jews play, the nations and rulers dance. In the world as it now is and probably remain, might proceeds right. The jews must acquire economical power sufficiently great to overcome prejudice against them. When we sink, we become a revolutionary proletariat, but when we rise, there rises also our terrible power of the purse.”
= Zionist Congress, at Basle, Switzerland, 1887: “The nations will exhort to tranquillity. They will be ready to sacrifice everything for peace, but we will not give them peace until they openly acknowledge our international super government, and with submissiveness.”
I’m quite sure you’ve seen some of these documentaries, if not all of them:
= https://rumble.com/v48q7t2-jekyll-island-the-truth-behind-the-federal-reserve-william-t.-still.html?mref=6zof&mc=dgip3&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Just+a+Dude&ep=2
= https://rumble.com/v3oaskh--bankers-wars.html?mref=6zof&mc=dgip3&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Real+Truth+Real+News&ep=2
= https://rumble.com/v4qqu4h-history-of-central-banking-and-the-enslavement-of-mankind-by-stephen-goodso.html?mref=6zof&mrefc=8
= https://rumble.com/v28vk5i-the-international-banker-conspiracy.html?mref=6zof&mrefc=3
Take care!
The Sheriff of Nottingham seems very likely to have been a jew with the tax franchise. The happy times were few and far between.
What a vain attempt to whitewash history.
Your argument is like saying that since there is no Geneva Convention and other modern treaties, so all ancient armies were free to kill POWs and negotiators from opposing side. Of course, there was no copyright and patent law earlier, but the concept of stealing and “intellectual property” existed long before the rise and arrival of Europeans in world stage.
If you are not aware of the examples of European stealing from the East, read up a bit about how the Italians (since they were the first European who had large contacts with the East) came to China to steal the silk-making technologies. Read up how the French came later to steal the porcelain technologies, and then the British came to steal the tea planting and processing technologies. All these were technologies that Chinese developed for thousands of years and highly profitable and valuable products. For example, from the book “For All the Tea in China: How England Stole the World’s Favorite Drink and Changed History” by Sarah Rose:
Note that Fortune knew very well he was stealing, that was why he tried to disguise himself as Chinese. And it was against Qing’s law to export tea planting and processing. Europeans not only stole from others, they stole from each others too:
https://www.allaboutlean.com/industrial-espionage-and-revolution/
I can continue to spend the next 5 hours giving examples of how the west stole technologies, sciences, mathematics, arts, artifacts, etc. But the above examples are already sufficient to refute your stupid claim that there was no concept of stealing “at all” (!!!) in earlier history.
I have heard a thousand times (here in Unz and elsewhere) that Europeans’ behaviors were not morally wrong, slavery was not morally wrong, the wars, conquests and genocides were not morally wrong. And there was no right or wrong about colonization, about opium wars, and now, nothing wrong about stealing too.
The fact is ancient peoples had concepts of morally good and bad too, sometimes even stronger than modern people in many ways. That was why before the opium war, Qing official wrote a letter to the Queen of Britain attempting to MORALLY persuade the British to stop the export of opium to China. We know what happened (do you?). And I can continue for another few hours too on this topic.
Most of the Europeans so-called “exploring” the world were not harmless explorations, out of curiosity or other innocuous reasons. Most of the times, the motivations were to look for places to loot, to colonize, and to get rich.
The English ceased to exist as a self-governing people in 1707; the crimes you imagine we committed in India were, where there is any truth to the stories at all, perpetrated by the ‘British’, most of whom seem to have been Scotch, as was the case in China.
(((Theodore Dalrymple))) FYI.
The majority of the London population is no longer white British and a large percentage are not white at all.
Have you been to China? If not, I recommend that you go. I have been there many times, the last trip was a couple of months back….I will say that it would be the best gift you can ever give yourself.
Not so much to see where China is, but to appreciate how much of our own minds have been manipulated by Western MSM.
Seeing China would then only be a tool, to compare reality from the constant propaganda we are fed.
That is an interesting observation. I must pay attention to it.
But my first reaction is that it could be explained by “Hunger”. Let me explain. The children of a rich man have had all the comforts of life from birth. They have no “hunger” for such comforts. But a young man from poor origins does. His mind is focused to achieve his goals.
So in that way, the Chinese are emerging from 200 years of collective disadvantageous circumstances, therefore they have a certain focus on satisfying that “hunger”.
My hunch, is that in 50 years, when a generation or two have become accustomed to the comforts, they will be a little more relaxed.
Considering that China has 4X the population of the US, or 2X the combined population of the West, the numbers of such occurrences themselves are not too worrying.
Jealous lovers, or crazed lunatics may use guns in the US, but they would use knives in China. …… In Singapore, killers have been known to cut up their victims and made them into curry!!! LOL.
Video Link
What this shows us it that the yellow man will always hate the white man for having bested him. This is very important to understand, if you live in a Sino-centric universe, history has to be rewritten to reflect it.
Nagasaki Death Spiral writes:
It’s one thing to be very well researched and simultaneously arrogant. I have no qualms with that.
If you know what you’re talking about, I care not how boastful you are – indeed I welcome the opportunity to learn from you.
With every syllable you utter, you further compound the stupidity of your previous commentary.
So, be a good fellow, and click on to this article posted in UR from 2022:
https://www.unz.com/lromanoff/the-richest-man-in-the-world/?showcomments#comments
That article is a long read but, then again, your knowledge base in relation to FOLLOWING THE MONEY and determining what entity is the real money power on the planet, is next to NIL.
So you have much catching up to do.
It should be OBVIOUS that King Chuck III is a tool of ZOG.
We know that because of the following sequence of events:
1) When he was Charles Prince of the Whales/Orcas (many decades ago), young Chuck had an independent streak and said things that were sensible, that were in the interests of the common man.
But ZOG didn’t view that very favourably, so they used their media assets in Britain to embarrass him, with exposures like this (aka Tampongate):
https://www.esquire.com/uk/culture/a34736481/tampongate-scandal-the-crown/
For those living under a rock that aren’t familiar with the incident, here is an excerpt from that article above:
2) No doubt ZOG had other dirt about King Chuck (like the relationship he had with his best friend, the serial paedophile Jimmy Saville).
Yes UR readers, they were BEST friends – not just casual acquaintances.
At the end of the day, if King Chuck III was anywhere near the head of the table (as far involvement in the money power that controls the entirety of the western financial system), then NO ONE would be dictating terms to him. ie: he’d be calling the shots.
The fact that ZOG treats him like a hired hand is proof the King Chuck III is well and truly subordinate to the Malignant Jewish miscreants that run the western world.
Simply put, people like King Chuck III, Bill Gates, George Soros and their multi-billionaire ilk, whilst certainly wealthy (when compared to the average Joe who still drives his beaten up 1980’s F-150 pick up and lives in suburbia), is a NON ENTITY relative to the power that ZOG possesses.
Even David Rockefeller, when he was alive, was acting in the capacity of the FRONT MAN for ZOG, like Klaus Schwab (and King Chuck III) does today.
That’s right, David Rockefeller (like all the other Rottenfellers), was well down the pecking order, nothing more than upper middle management.
At the end of the day, even if King Chuck III had ten fold of what he possesses today in terms of net worth, he would still not be eligible to have a seat at ZOG’s table.
That’s because he’s NOT ONE OF THEM – he’s not a Talmudic Jew.
Of course, after Chuck and his son William die, young George VII will be King in about 50 years time (give or take).
Boy George may well be eligible for a seat at the table – seeing as his mother, Kate Middleton, is Jewish.
Got it now NagasakiDeathSpiral?
Hilarious how it is claimed by ‘your idea of a proof expert’ that King Chuck is forced by script, when he may just believe in global warming and act accordingly.
You come across as an exitcable teenager Troof Fairy, who is clearly far too young to remember how back in the 1970’s it was quite common knowledge that the Queen of England was by far the richest woman in the world and how ‘they’ went into overdrive trying to hush it up and how it came to be that this previous talk of royal wealth was never ever talked about again and ‘just the fact that there was the need for silence’ is far more evidence to me than any of your teenage style theories.
I stated upthread that my wager was on Royals vs Rothschild in U.K and you have tried enforcing your non proven belief on me and so you are the arrogant one infact but with the Vigilante bit in your name that comes as no suprise to me.
I didn’t watch your video, because I knew it was Socialist misdirection when it said:
You obviously know NOTHING about Capitalism, which (among other things) is about:
competitive markets, price systems, private property, property rights recognition, economic freedom, entrepreneurship, voluntary exchange
And I cannot emphasise enough the last one in the list above. ie: VOLUNTARY EXCHANGE.
In other words, if you don’t want to buy that prone-to-combust lemon (otherwise known as an Electric Vehicle/EV), you shouldn’t have to.
If you genuinely care about the environment and want to save the planet, you should be allowed to emit as much of the ‘Gas of Life (CO2) as you please – seeing as CO2 is greening the planet and MASSIVELY increasing crop yields per hectare of arable land (while simultaneously having no downside whatsoever – seeing as so-called Anthropogenic Global Warming is an obvious hoax).
In other words, in REAL Capitalism, your life is not micromanaged by busy-body ZOG affiliated politicians and bureaucrats.
You see, when GENUINE Capitalism exists:
THAT, UR readers, is what GENUINE CAPITALISM is all about.
In true Capitalism there is constant churn, as the market leaders of a generation ago are soon discarded in the dustbin of history, as new entrants build a better mousetrap, and this become the next generation of successful Captains of Industry/Tech Goliaths etc.
In a nutshell, there will always be corrupt politicians and bureaucrats that will be susceptible to ZOG bribes. NO SYSTEM, NO REGULATORY framework will ever change that.
We do not have Capitalism of any description in the U.S right now, at least not practsied in the big end of town. The U.S is a Socialist shit-hole, and what we’re witnessing is CRONY CORPORATISM, whereby favoured corporations/cronies, get sweetheart deals (eg: public assets privatised at cents on the dollar of their true worth, or Public Private Partnerships/PPP’s, where the oligarchs pocket the profits and any losses are socialised and the taxpayer is on the hook for that.
THAT IS NOT CAPITALISM.
There are NO BAIL OUTS in Capitalism.
Taxpayers should NEVER be on the hook for reckless business practices/speculative trading etc, that leads to losses (as was the case in the 2008 GFC when Big Gubmint bailed out the likes of Goldman Sachs-of-shit and G.M).
Both deserved to fail* – and under Capitalism they would have.
(*People assume that if G.M was allowed to fail that the whole U.S car industry would have imploded. That is DEAD WRONG).
Most of the U.S major airlines have gone bankrupt on multiple occasions, but the airline industry went from strength to strength.
What occurred is that the assets of the distressed company were purchased by another entity, someone who was capable of running the company more efficiently. Sometimes the name of the company was changed, sometimes not. It just operated under new management using the old name).
And so it would’ve been in the case of G.M. during the 2008 GFC.
Perhaps Ford would have purchased the assets of G.M in liquidation? Or perhaps an ex-auto chief executive, like a Lee Iacocca equivalent, would’ve raised billions in an IPO and started his own company using GM’s assets.
He would’ve hired the right people, fired the unproductive parasites in the organisation.
He would’ve worked on improving quality control, would’ve reinvested more in R & D (like Toyota do), to ensure that his company was a market leader in introducing cutting edge innovation.
Those loss making factories would’ve been closed down and capital would then be freed up to invest in those parts of the enterprise that were profitable. ie: expand production on those profitable sections of the company (which may not have entailed a net loss of jobs – and indeed may have resulted in MORE jobs added down the track as the business prospered and expanded production).
In other words, G.M would’ve survived, but in a reconfigured way, in a SUSTAINABLE way.
The ONLY SOLUTION to the mess we’re in now is to minimise government, drastically reduce the funding it gets, and thus make it next to impossible for the established players to maintain their monopolies.
Doing this will guarantee the demise of ZOG within a few* generations.
(*Of course we could fast track the process by prosecuting ZOG for its role in orchestrating 9/11, the Covid Psyop, the murders of JFK/RFK/JFK Jr and much more.
Naturally, when they’re found guilty, their ill gotten gains can be confiscated, and thus the instant demise of ZOG will eventuate).
What’s not to like about that?
NagasakiDeathSpiral writes:
BTW, I’m a boomer. How old are you?
Of course Mr Nagasaki ‘heard’ that the Queen was the richest woman in the world from the same people that told us Bill Gates was the world’s richest, and thereafter Elon Musk. (ie: the corrupt ZOG controlled western MSM).
Well the British monarch is nowhere near as rich as the two I’ve quoted above.
And the two above have a net worth of the order of around a couple of hundred billion USD.
Now Mr Nagasaki, what is it that you don’t understand about this statement (below) that I posted in a previous comment?:
The Jewish dynastic ‘Old Money’ families have a combined worth that is multiples of U.S GDP.
Let me put that in USD terms. That’s a minimum of DOZENS OF TRILLIONS.
(Do you understand what a trillion is ? It is ONE THOUSAND BILLION).
So Mr Nagasaki, by all means go on believing in your little fairy tale about King Chuck III and his ilk. By all means keep collecting those trinkets (like cups, saucers and teaspoons etc), that celebrate the monarchy (seeing as you’re evidently a monarchist that hopes King Chuck will find favour with you and the two of you will get betrothed* after he dumps Queen HorseFace Camilla.
King Chuck can whisk you off to his castle and the two of you will live happily ever after – just like in that fantasy world that you occupy.
(*King Chuck is known to have had more than his share of homosexual indulgences in the past – like that episode he had with one of his butlers.
That aspect of his personality may have been a byproduct of his close relationship with Lord Louis Mountbatten, the known pederast).
So there’s still hope for you Mr Nagasaki. I wish you well in that endeavour. (The two of you deserve each other – I mean that sincerely).
Virtue overtaking vice is the imposition of just order. Vice overcoming virtue is obscenity.
Britain bit off more than it could chew and afterwards capitulated more than it could bear. Britain chose bargaining with foreign nations over reconciliation with God. So it continues to self-help its way towards perdition. Should the British people vanish from the earth, it would be a terrible waste of human excellence.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/history/trail/conquest/wessex_kings/birth_england_wessex_03.shtml#:~:text=The%20story%20goes%20that%20Pope,English%20were%20a%20chosen%20race.
I mean not to fan the flames of hysteria, and I’m sure the book has been posted before, but
Racial theorists go crazy.
Those who control the banking system have funds limited in purchasing power only by the assets and services on the market. Anything that it would be practical to acquire, they could acquire, money, in the conventional sense, is no object.
Hey Luis, thanks for the info and posts which I do know some of it. It is still good have a reminder and the links to share.
Thanks again.
“I didn’t watch your video”
That is your loss then. How can one comment on one bit of a video that they never bothered to watch fully?
Maybe you should change your user name 🤔
Word is cheap. As I already challenge you guys, start your own revolutions, like what Chinese had done 100 years ago, to bring your collective west to the right path. You can’t. Because you lack the courage, wisdom and IQ to do so.
I am sorry you just noticing it. Most of the so-called western “history” and narratives are full of lies and holes. But those falsehoods were common knowledge for most of the world already, not just the “Sino-centric universe.”
I will write more on this subject when I can. There are a few threads here. It’s not close enough for me to make an approach at the moment.
The Japanese also believed they were superior to whites. The truth is that this is a sign of being at a more primitive stage in the development of civilization.
There is nothing wrong with being proud of one’s civilization, and Chinese civilization undoubtedly has a great history. Unfortunately, the chauvinism of the Chinese is a sign of their weakness, not of strength.
https://rarehistoricalphotos.com/five-races-of-mankind-1911/
Oh please, don’t show your ignorance. Most Japanese always think they are inferior to whites. They try hard to be white, and never accept themselves to be yellow. Only Chinese proudly accept to be called yellow, due to cultural and historical reasons.
LOL. Again, don’t make me laugh. The simple fact is that you guys just couldn’t accept chinks talking back to you. I was just criticizing and listing down points what your ancestors did (plus many of you still doing) wrong. And how those actions differs from what Chinese did. But, but, but… those must be “chauvinism” and “weakness.”
Still can’t tell which civilization is more primitive??
France has historically been open to race-mixing than other places. Lovecraft suspected they could absorb foreign blood more than other groups.
France’s greatest period came when it had Teuton influences.
While France does appear doomed–reversing immigration with third worlders is not impossible. Transportation technology isn’t what it used to be–Pakistan kicked out half a million Afghans. Plus many of the low IQ folk will self-deport when the welfare party is over.
Yep, they are whites wannabes:
You make a good point.
My own perspective requires a slight adjustment to your very meaning laden statement:
When the Chinese become chauvinist, they become weak.
I make this adjustment because the Chinese have a very long history, with many high points, and as many low points.
Their golden ages coincided with when they were open and able to learn from foreign peoples.
In contrast, the lowest point in their history was preceded by the height of their chauvinism in the late 1700s to early 1800s.
and 1000 years before that, they were Chinese wannabes.
A pattern is emerging…… that the Japanese psyche deeply respects power. They will emulate whoever is more powerful than them.
Surely even someone with a low level of logical association could divine the answer. Why did so many rich Russians decamp to Israel, the UK and the US?
I see what you did there… Britons found it intolerable to be ruled by a plutocratic westernised oriental gentleman who does not look British.
These rich people want to have money coming to them without having to do any actual work to earn it.
The Chinese government wants to take the country on a totally DIFFERENT path:
England didn’t/doesn’t have any gold. The idea that politicians control or the people own the Bank of England was and is absurd, even when the BoE was nationalised in 1946 that only consisted of an irrelevant ignored ‘advisory committee’, much like the previous ‘polite hints’, it gave to the owners of the then approximately 16 private banks it had always comprised -actual ownership didn’t change. Political control was a fiction. Not only is it not ‘yours’ (if British), it’s your mortal enemy. The Bank of England’s job is to steal and launder the resources and the labour of the land and the people of (occupied) England and occupied Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland. It’s a parasite abusing the national name.
The economy was already wrecked by then, Brown was moving the proceeds of crime on to its frightful owners, sharing the spoils with the gang. Manufacturing contraction under Blair/Brown finished off what the Thatcher governments started for the big fish, with the few remaining small-medium fry productive independent businesses/employers surviving subjected to wrecking-ball tactics and taken down, land, plant, stock, trade-marks, customer-bases appropriated.
The scam was you (a closed-shop of selected traders) en-masse could borrow pounds buy the under-valued gold, wait for the pound to depreciate as it must, then repay the (now plentiful and cheap) borrowed pounds and still have a profit, it was two dead-cert scams rolled together for the price of one, at zero risk.
The same happened with pound/Deustchmark trading under the European exchange-rate-mechanism (ERM) scam pulled by Major/Lamont, with opposition-leader John Smith in on it. You could borrow over-valued pounds, trade them for DM, wait for the pound inevitably to fall, then repay the £-sterling loans with lots of DM left over. Currency speculators ganged-up pack-like on every European currency in turn, versus the stable DM, till the game-able ERM scam had run its course and national treasuries emptied. Countries so looted clamoured to join, for ‘protection’, the Euro, the DM in all but name.
These were select-few enrichment projects, blatant and in your face, politician-enabled financial crimes. Politicians are content with financial remuneration, during and after their starring-role and with the superficial trappings of power, because that, they soon learn, is all that is on offer. Scapegoats, Aunt-Sallys, punch-bags, national-treasures. Villains, one and all.
They don’t do these things out of stupidity but it does help if they’re economically illiterate/innumerate as well as blackmail targets. If they don’t co-operate, people start dying, if they still don’t co-operate they themselves die, politically or literally. They do what they’re bidden to do, or it gets nasty.
Lebensraum ! Not: Liebestraum (= love dream)
The USA advertises itself internationally as a place where conmen can get rich without working, so it draws in criminals and the unscrupulous from across the world.
Perhaps, but it doesn’t change the fact that British industry was so ramshackle that it was a plausible story to the Cabinet. Nor does it change the fact that British industry has been in a long ‘secular’ decline.
Good advice, and even more important: help your children move out of the “uk.”
“Dalrymple” hopefully is not a father. What a sad, sick, selfish, shortsighted bastard.
Our children are an enormous financial expense and require a lot of hard work to take care of — and we wouldn’t trade it for a minute.
Alhamdullilah for new life, new hope, and the love of family as God intended 💕
It looks like your saintly “rest of the world” still has plenty of criminals and unscrupulous actors.
Fella me lad this is a leading question about the state of Chinese society. Not about capital-flight-topia Anglo-America. About this last we all know, smart boi.
In China, several hundred million peasants — most of whom would not have been reproductive stock in another age — have been enfranchised within a single generation. The Chinese sit on the cusp of postmodernity, flush with enthusiasm, confidence, and refrigerators from their market modernity speedrun. There will be cultural and political effects from 800M mouths lifted out of extreme poverty since 1970. In one sense, it actually means 800M are now on the money grid, networked to global capital, however indirectly. 800M mouths to eat. 800M mouths to speak. 800M pairs of eyes to see. 800M brains to wonder, what about Me? 800M souls to incorporate.
The American Joe on gaining similar social enfranchisement 75-100 years ago, promptly fumbled the whole of the franchise. Promotion gave broad cultural write permissions to people mainly equipped for read only, resulting in irreparable damage to the codebase. The permission to ‘add users’ was also handed out rather too freely, in the moment when history seemed to stop and victory seemed eternal. Sometimes I lose track of who writes what where under what alias.
A reformed China without its traditional controllers might be a holy terror, a haunted machine. We wait.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in_China
https://www.nationalww2museum.org/students-teachers/student-resources/research-starters/research-starters-us-military-numbers
https://www.defense.gov/News/Feature-Stories/Story/article/1727086/75-years-of-the-gi-bill-how-transformative-its-been/
What’s wrong with China has some interesting excerpts.
https://archive.org/details/whatswrongwithch00gilb/page/10/mode/2up
that’s what I was getting at. I’m aware of the BOE background. Excellent post(s).
The billion plus crowd in China all have it back to front then in their spiritually immature and silly competitive and egotism based beliefs,but then most believe in reality(which is just as back to front)and Buddha even tried teaching Chinese about the illusion and non existence of self
around 2500 years ago but clearly today all but that infinitesimal small fraction(at the very very best) get Buddha’s drift and hence the mass Chinese(ego)problem we are discussing.
Yes, they really hate big mouthed kike loving retards. Ever wonder why “huh-whites” (((nationalists))) like you have literally nowhere to run to, to regroup and no major non-western country (even Russia) wants to befriend you?
The day this “huh-why” nonsense (anglo and kikes) die out is the day Europe and its people will live peacefully again, among the people of the world.
Reading through some of the comments here, I can already picture some huh-white nationalist retards getting chopped up by shitskins, and not one soul will help them.
I’ve never said anyone was saintly or without criminals.
China has several advantages. First, it is ruled by the CPC, by far the most competent governmental entity in the world. Second, nowhere in its ruling class does it have a group analogous to Jews in the west, hell bent on undermining their civilization. The CPC is almost all men and almost all Han Chinese. Third, monied interests do not have large influence on government policy. It is government that directs capital, not the reverse.
The USA followed the path it did because it was a liberal shit hole founded by Anglo and Jewish pirates for the purpose of tax evasion. It can’t really be compared to real civilizations.
This comment seems like a direct response, or at least relevant to the exchanges between us. I don’t know whether you forgot to reply to me, or intentionally do so (as a way to disengage?)
I haven’t read the book you quoted. But just like 99.9% of what I have read about China written by Westerners, from a few pages of browsing, I am convinced that this is extremely superficial and stupid. A few brief response.
Consider the book publication date of 1926, this is a very ignorant statement. The real situation was the diagonal opposite. It was a period of chaos and lowest time in the 5000 years history of China. Most of the ordinary Chinese were confused and the elites were widely divided and unsure. Everyone was searching for the reasons of “what’s wrong with China”. Politically, they tried every conceivable forms of government, from monarchy, to constitutional monarchy, to parliamentarism, multi-partisanism to presidentialism. China as a whole tried to be a republic, a democratic republic, dictatorship, federalism, nationalism, fascism, communism, authoritarian, one-party military dictatorship and warlordism… you name it, they tried it. Intellectually, reformists called to learn from America, learn from Nazism, from British, from France, from Japan, from Soviet, etc. Does this sounds like someone who are convinced that “there is nothing fundamentally wrong?”
Furthermore, they started revolutions after revolutions, and movements after movements. The Taiping and Nian Rebellions were anti-emperor, but not anti-monarchy, and the hundred Days’ Reform or Wuxu Reform of 1898 (百日维新, or 戊戌变法) was anti-monarchy but not anti-emperor. And then the Xinhai revolution was both anti-emperor and anti-monarchy. There was the Western Affairs Movement (洋务运动, 1861–1895), Gengzi New Policies (庚子新政) of 1901-1911, the New Culture Movement, which came after the May Fourth Movement, etc. Many people wanted to uproot the entire cultural and social fabric, so much so there was anti-Confucianism, anti-intellectualism, and even anti-Chinese language. The end results of the 100+ years was that Chinese people not only did many thorough and complete political reforms and revolutions, they went through a wholesale revisions of the cultural, social and philosophical views of their lives, the world and the universe.
This is again nonsense. It is a pure projection from a Westerner. Gods don’t play as important a role in Chinese as in other ancient or modern cultures, let alone “elects” Chinese as the chosen people. In fact, Confucius already advised over 2000 years ago 敬鬼神而远之 (respect the Gods but stay far from them)!
Too much BS, too little times.
Enough of the rubbish.
You know what they say about the Jews, they don’t believe in God, but they believe He gave them Palestine. You should not mistake figurative language for the author suggesting the Chinese were strongly polytheistic or theistic.
If the Chinese were that arrogant at the nadir of their history, we can only imagine what they are like now.
What you say does not sound untrue to me, but that is because I know just as little about what’s actually going on in China as you.
We peer out at China through our fringe-political, dog-whistle, near-conspiracy, disaffected hobby-commentariat lens. The China we reference here, she of Anglin’s vain imaginings, is no more than an icon, a Madonna, the glimpse of a girl through a douyin beauty-filter, an object, shorthand for real dissatisfaction.
Let’s not be silly. China is massive, old, complex, foreign, unimaginable. China is not the e-girl answer to incel frustration. And since you’re not near the one you love, love the one you’re near (old maid ‘Murica). I mean unless Trump deports you.
I think you got the timeline a little back to front.
The Chinese collapsed to the lowest point in their history because the were arrogant in the century or two BEFORE the said collapse. They closed themselves from the world, and rotted, eventually becoming so weak, they could not resist a few Europeans on a few gunboats.
Now let us see if the trend has continued….
There are many Westerners in China. A good many of them would scarcely be able to make a living in their own countries, but in China, they are fat and happy employed as “English Teachers”.
Why? Because there is an insatiable appetite for learning English in China. To the Chinese, English is gateway, the means to engage with the world.
English is mandatory subject in Chinese schools….starting at First Grade!!!!
I make the bolded parts particularly to distinguish the intent of the Chinese people to learn English……it is NOT to become Anglo or even Western (tho some people might try to flatter themselves with this belief).
…..but, IT IS to engage with the wider world.
It is clear to me that China has learned from its painful lesson on arrogance/hubris.
In a somewhat ironic way, US is at the very same juncture in history now as China was 200 years ago. Will it avoid the pitfalls of arrogance? …. it does not look likely so far.
No, I don’t know, and not interested, and don’t believe…, especially coming from a white guy’s mouth. So, please stop dragging in other third party, like Japanese, Jews…
I read carefully, and I know Chinese history well. I believe that author was VERY stupid and VERY wrong.
LOL. In contrast to me, you obviously didn’t even read a fraction of what I wrote, e.g. if Chinese were calling to “learn from America, learn from Nazism, from British, from France, from Japan, from Soviet, etc”, how can you call them arrogant, by any stretch of the definition of the word?
Sounds like you are the real arrogant + ignorant guy – not a surprise to me.
This is why they will own the world. They remember what “wealth” actually is. Tic toc for the (((west))). No engineer, no revolutionary, no sciencetist and no warrior. The Wrath of the LORD.
Are the Chinese the world’s savior? Of course not. They are the nemesis created by God to punish the wicked.
You’ve stated, parsimoniously, what is likely very close to the truth. To veer the topic slightly, was the apparent exclusion of Jews in England mere cover for the hidden power of the Jews? The emergence of the Jews from the shadows is often conventionally assigned to Oliver Cromwell. But I recently came across a paper (by a French scholar) who established that Henry VIII relied on Talmudic rabbis to formulate arguments to take to then pope in the matter of his divorce of Catherine of Aragon. Henry then required his sons to study Hebrew and mandated the circumcision of his male lineage (which apparently continues today).
In the US, a mere 30 years ago, there was a strict dividing line between the WASP and Jewish investment banks (ie Morgan Stanley vs Salomon Bros). Obviously, this no longer exists. But at that time, the elite city clubs (Union League, New York Racquet etc) did not admit Jews (and even Catholics in cases) whereas today that has changed too (though the WASPS by and large avoid mixing, at least in my observation).
What caused this to happen? These clubs must have encountered financial difficulties and required Jew money…and memberships. In the last year, the Princeton Club of New York closed its doors.
Jews were present in England the entire time they had supposedly been expelled, and were among the wealthiest merchants and criminals in England. For example, Shakespeare was almost certainly a Jew:
http://aish.com/was-shakespeare-a-believing-jew/
This is not true. WASPs have been mixing with Jews for centuries. For the most part, any opposition to mixing came from the Jewish side. The Jews use tactical mixing by offering their Jewish daughters to influential gentiles (call this “the Esther tactic”), but they try to retain their pure Jewish core.
” they are fat and happy employed as “English Teachers”.”
They would make more at home, but not in a job as a teacher. But the real reason they go there, for the most part, of course, is for the Oriental women, which is why they are so hated and despised now more than ever.
I would say the Chinese born during the Cultural Revolution and remembered the past and were in America had a certain humility and old-fashioned aspect about them. Even so, one (an excellent fellow from Wuhan) told me hoped for a return to the Tang Dynasty, when foreigners studied in China, and not abroad. The younger ones, no. Polite and friendly but without the same aspect.
The guy who wrote the book obviously knew exactly what he was talking about. Whites shouldn’t despise the Chinese, or mock them, or hate them, but they should recognize the truth. d dan should help make it clear to white people, the sort of thinking that is endemic over there.
Perhaps that was true at one time, but it is not so clear cut now.
The average salary of a high school English teacher in China is about USD $41,000
Deduct 25% applicable income tax, that would leave $30,750
If we adjust for PPP/cost of living, then it would be $59,040
The average salary of a high school teacher in USA is $53,610
Deduct 22% applicable income tax, that would leave $41,815
So if one were an average high school teacher in the US, one would be faced with a real choice…have almost 50% more spending power in China? or stay somewhere familiar.
If the said high school teacher were single and had a taste for Asian women, then as you have said,….he would make the switch in a heartbeat.
He is really expressing the hope of all Chinese people, not just his own. The Tang, along with the Han and arguably other dynasties….were regarded as the golden ages of their civilisation.
Incidentally, that is why the Chinese call themselves Han or more accurately “people of Han”. They were not so much expressing ethnicity as they are expressing inclusion in a civilisation that they are so proud of. Of course over the centuries, and contact with the West, such definitions become muddied and used interchangeably with Han “ethnicity”.
As a case in point, some Chinese people, particularly in the south, call themselves “people of Tang”, rather than Han…..but both terms have essentially the same meaning.
I can’t comment on the book because I have never read it.
But what you have written is wise indeed.
As for the the way your countrymen regard China, I regard it is somewhat natural…. a necessary phase that all empires go through. That being said, the shorter, and less intense the that phase, the better.
The Brits had a relatively short and mild period of letting go of their empire. I can only hope that the US will learn from them.
Whether China will indeed become another empire after the US? Now that is an interesting discussion.
LOL. Another cowardly attempt to hide your attacks behind someone’s back.
The main theme of my original comment of #109 (which causes so much irks to you guys) was an attack on the rise of the British empire, but very little about the achievements of China. Apparently, you either can’t or unwillingly to engage my points of attacks, but choose to shift the whole debate to the so-called “arrogance” and “chauvinism” of the Chinese people. If anything, these exchanges prove that many white guys
1. still hide their heads under the sand on those ugly history.
2. couldn’t stand that some colored people are so rudely assertive, relentless and direct on those topics.
As to whether the Chinese are in general arrogant and chauvinist, you haven’t proved a single thing.
Being the world’s saviour is a Western obsession….only they and the other Abrahamic adherents think in these universal terms.
If we pay attention to Deep Thought’s words. Everything he wrote about the Chinese applies only to the Chinese themselves.
The Chinese are essentially an inward looking people. They neither regard their system applicable to the world, nor seek to be anyone else’s self appointed Messiah.
The Chinese identity obsessed ‘littleredot’ writes.
The Chinese are essentially an inward looking people’s’
Right,is that why you regard Indians in Singapore as ‘an infestation’ and clearly a less superior race and life form than the Chinese race in your opinion?.
At least we have learned exactly why the Chinese are so ‘obsessively inward looking’ unless they need a few more fat English teachers from outside to help boost the obsession.
Enough to make the ghost of the Indian Buddha gently smile from his very ancient grave.
As no one should. Charity starts at home, and when it is good enough at home, it will organically spill over to other places too. The West is paying the final price for it’s collusion and wholesale adoptation of the kikes’ satanic ways. It really looks like the end. I can only hope for ethnic survival, and that is enough.
One of your China centric pals on Unz ‘littleredot’ has recently in the past referred to Asian Indians in Singapore as ‘an infestation’ and so it is actually quite easy to get a general idea about typical Chinese arrogance and superiority complex because infestation is usually a term used about rats and cockroaches and other vermin one wants to keep well out from the inside.
It is quite ironic that Buddha was Indian and so clearly as Buddhism is still numero uno in China today 2500 years on,at one point in history the Chinese weren’t so inward looking afterall,to their great credit,because ‘inward looking’ really means ‘dont want to look out because looking inward is superior’.
Pajeets anywhere are an infestation. They’re a race of 1.5 billion gypsies.
And there it is in a nutshell.
The masses don’t get it and are easily distracted by the circus those at the top create for them. Very rarely, in real time (off the computer), do we meet anyone that has a grasp of this (quote above). Those at the bottom will pin their living decline on whomever the scapegoat is at the time.
The Rentier, Administrative, and billionaire classes are the ones who needed the sudden mass immigration because they need more consumers of their financial products. “If it hadn’t been for the mass influx of migrants, UK would not have made it” – that is always what they say, but they really mean THEY wouldn’t have made it. The masses are resourceful and would have figured something out.
Thx sakyamuni
I was referring to the social mixing at a place like the New York Yacht Club — where I went to a birthday party and saw the groups being largely immiscible.
Why do you even ask me about him? Littleredot is available easily by a mouse click, and more than capable of answering your stupid attacks by himself.
Or do you think all those little yellow chinks look, eat, think, reproduce and infest alike?
What do you mean,me ask you about him?.
Glad i hit a raw nerve as that was my intention.
“The masses don’t get it and are easily distracted by the circus those at the top create for them.”
Those at the top also know how to massage the egos of the ones below that do their bidding for them.
Look at the Davos Young Global Leaders and other think tank organisations where they are groomed the members egos are massaged into believing that they are of importance and will be the ones making the changes that the world needs to be a better place.
This also takes place in all levels of Politics from low down councillors to members of goverment.
Thatcher was, and shall always be a nasty old you know what, All of these “nationalists”, like her and even Reagan, end up being incrementalists, turning up the heat on the boiling frog. There are no nationalists in the West, just vampires. Sinn Fein? They want one Ireland just to fill it with Ukrainians, and Africans. The country is now 77% white! Don’t you see that this is cultural destruction on an epic, worldwide scale. They’ve built service based welfare states, the only way to feed that monster is an ever expanding base of the pyramid, that is the only way to keep the ponzi scheme going.
Remember trade unions? All they did was assure that their members went from skilled workers with decent benefits to skilled workers without jobs in economies that, in their realm, only need unskilled workers.
How a new nationalism where self reliance is at the core, where nations can make products as cheap as China, and keep those jobs and that capital at home. How about going to visit them as seeing how to be capitalists from the “communists”.
I can just see someone like you at a shindig for Yachting types in NYC and i would wager that you had a pocket book full of words with lots of letters that few understand the meaning of and that you regulary went to ‘the baathroom’ just to peek at the note book so that when you went back to the party you could try and impress others with your word knowledge,just so you could feel or superior and soothe that inflated sense of self yours.
You may impress many others but one or two others will just gently smile at your spiritual ignorance and egotism.
LOL, that is because I have this creature on “Ignore” mode.
I have better things to do than to interact with creatures who are no better than Flat Earthers.
Given his ATTENTION SEEKING tendencies, being ignored must get him pretty riled up.
Sorry that you have been caused trouble … 不好意思
Nah. All of those people have mixed race Anglo-Jew families.
Well, they certainly look pretty much alike (observe in the photo below that they’re virtually indistinguishable from afar):
They certainly eat alike (a disproportionate number of their meals feature a bowl of hot water with some noodles and a few veg – with perhaps a thin slice or two of meat).
They certainly think alike (look at Little Red Bot, corralled in a little dog box of an apartment in that 15 min city he lives in – otherwise known as Sing-a-poor).
Sing-a-poor-eans (like the born-to-obey automatons that they are), accept the fact that they’ll never be able to afford a car of their own for personal use on their little island, that they’re destined to travel on public transport and go no further than the 20km radius of the mass transit system that Big Brother Authoritarian Gubmint have allocated to them for the rest of their lives.
They certainly appear to reproduce the same way (eg: one child policy, fornicating in the same old way – hence the reason Asian women throw themselves at the white boys, because the effeminate Asian men are incapable of satisfying their carnal desires).
So Daisho-Dan*, it looks like you’ve been caught out here.
(*Daisho= an antimicrobial peptide of the fruit fly).
One nice looking girl in of a row of 7 teenage girls is poor and if the same happened in Japan it would be more like 4 -5 nice looking girls from the 7.
Come on China sort your Karma out.
When one hears talk in Europe of far away travel destinations folk would like to visit it is Japan that often gets mentioned and rarely is it China and so clearly Japan is the real cultural ruler and dream hot-spot in the far East and to boot it has the stunningly beautiful snow capped Mt Fuji close to the capital but in China’s capital snow capped mountains are a long way away and so all there is left for the disappointed tourist is the stunning beauty of concrete and man made electric lights.
Going by some of the egotism based rantings that some of the red crew post here on Unz now that China is rising to the top of the spiritual dung pile,China is way way down my list of places i would visit and so i extend by gratitude to them for saving me money.
‘This creature’
You really mean ‘life form well below me and far less superior than me and my Chinese brethren’
Thats the real meaning of a nations ‘looking inwards’.
Smiling gently from his ancient Indian grave.
Japan is an American slave colony with Americanized culture, so of course westerners prefer to visit it. Westerners like that stay within their cultural bubble, only visiting other western countries or their colonies.
You have a very short memory, we have been through all of this before. But since you like to be reminded of the painful truth:
The price of these cars are based on market demand. You know why the market rates for the cars are so high?
………………….per capita income USD PPP
Australia…………$66,000
Singapore……….$133,000
‘Westerners like that stay within their cultural bubbles’
Nonsense,Westerners go to Japan to experience what is so very different from their own culture and it has nothing whatsoever to do with the fact that Japan is subservient to the U.S hegemon and for you to say Japan has an Americanised culture just because McDonald’s,for example have spread their ugly tentacles into Japan is like saying the U.K has an Indianised culture just because Indian restaurants out number all the other restaurants in U.K,which would be silly as millions of British have never even heard of Brahma.
Other westerners who prefer their own Euro style bubbles of culture go to European colonised countries like Australia and New Zealand.
The best thing about China is what can be viewed up close in stunningly beautiful Nepal.
False. They go to Japan because it is familiar (because it is western), yet still seemingly “exotic.”
It isn’t like that at all because India does not control the UK. The USA does control Japan, and “Japanese culture” is fully American.
Maybe you don’t know about this?
Professor of Sociology, Emeritus Hirofumi Tanada from Waseda University, Tokyo, stated that out of the 230,000 Muslims living in Japan as of 2022, 46,000 are ethnic Japanese converts.
The numbers of Japanese becoming Muslims is rising yearly. I remember meeting some Japanese in Central London around 15 yrs ago and was very suprised to find out that they were Muslims!
Totally agree! Whites certainly embrace diversity, diversity of looks, of reproduction, of infestation, of everything… 98.593129883 types of sexes, rainbow of colors, 438^3 levels of micro-aggressions, 17205698*e/log(56349) sub-categories of virtue signaling, Netflix night movie galore with Mermaid (featuring Kim Kardashian), Snow Black (starring Michelle Obama), The Beauty (starring Nancy Pelosi) and The Beast (starring Donald Trump), plus free choices of coke, pepsi, diet-coke and sprite.
Wait, or do you? I am confused. 🙁
True in a few cases, not generally (at least in the US). Do you know what the Social Register is? I went to school with the scions of these families, and they’re very conscious of their lineages. I went to weddings on both “sides” (from Grosse Pointe to Boca Raton) and they’re quite distinct. To answer my own original question, it seems likely that the WASPS cooperate from greed — and not from any sense of communality with Jews.
OTOH, they don’t have much of a sense of fraternity with middle class white gentiles either.
Do as your inner voice commands you — isn’t that a saying of one of the Indian serpent gods? Rat gods? A serious question.
I’m sorry you didn’t have the change to mix with a broader group of people in your earlier years, but that isolation may be a factor in your certainty of the “truth” of what you say.
When one has heard, and continues to communicate with intelligent people of differing opinions, one than learn. Or, in many cases, possibly yours, one may have the opportunity to see further, but choose not too.
Theodore Dalrymple is actually Anthony Daniels, a Jew. Need one say more to explain his morbid misanthropy? ‘Theodore’ is NO ‘divine gift’.
You Western supremacists really fear China, therefore hate it, in your brainwashed ignorance and racism.
Their lineages are also mixed with Jews, as wealthy Anglos and Dutch have been for hundreds of years.
If your inner voice is trying to tell you things about my earlier years that you can’t possibly know,then you may want to get that schizophrenia checked out.
Strive for the more ‘middle path’ and you will thank me later when you come to understand that it wasn’t Einstein that first understood the meaning of life and that Einstein didn’t have a clue anyway.
.
Yes. Also, have you heard ~ there are some dinosaurs out there who really fear homosexuals, due to latent desire for their bosom buddies, and therefore hate them, in their brainwashed ignorance and genderism.
We must combat Hate and Fear. Love, here meaning Inclusivity, is all.
Dear dear ..what an uninformed imbecile…I should imagine from the drivel you scribble you read the Daily Fail and no doubt have a couple of dilapidated semis in some shithile London borough you rent out to Africans.. (the Poles you used to rent to no doubt having the good sense to get the fuck out of your slums before they ended up boiled in a pot by the invading channel crossers that had taken over the shithole)..
.. probably even worse than all of this is you work in insurance or accounting for some faceless service industry…which really is unforgivable…
Brits are the most dumb people in Euro.
There is no greater betrayal of Britain than this…
There have been repeated waves of Jewish migration. They are inextricable from Western Civilization.
https://www.unz.com/article/the-great-british-betrayal/#comment-6653690
A few years ago, there was the quite funny book Er ist wieder da. I have come to see that Sie waren schon immer da.
yes, the problems we have can’t just be pinned on the upper levels; the whole thing is rotten from top to bottom, inside out.
Scotland was an agricultural and industrial backwater before the Act of Union gave them even greater access to English capital than the accession of James I had done. Oatcakes, porridge and haggis, for example, are not Scotch in origin but are identified as such only because Scotch agriculture was so primitive that it could produce little more than oats and sheep until union with England meant they could afford the agricultural and industrial advances being made in England.
James I was a dribbling fop who could not understand the workings of the English exchequer when he came to the throne and robbed his English subjects to reward his Scotch ‘favourites’. His idiot son, Charles I, was so incompetent that he reduced England to civil war, one result of which was the readmission of the Jews to the country by Oliver Cromwell.
The Scotch have never been anything but a greedy, expensive and troublesome nuisance to England.
Saviano Is a noted leftwinger who supports non-white immigration to Italy