RSS
When British Conservative politician Ann Widdecombe dared to say what any rational person believes about the soon-to be-royal Ms. Meghan Markle (“I think she’s trouble”) she was branded a “racist dinosaur” . [A ROYAL PAIN Celebrity Big Brother’s Ann Widdecombe branded a ‘racist dinosaur’ after saying Meghan Markle is ‘trouble’ because of ‘her background’, By Fay Strang, The Sun, January10, 2018] In fact, the deeply religious Widdecombe, ensconced in the UK’s “Celebrity Big Brother House,” didn’t mention Markle’s ethnicity or the fact that this is a mixed-race marriage at all. But given the psychological and strongly genetic factors that predict divorce, this whole marriage is “trouble.” A “super-forecaster” acquaintance–whose meal ticket is his ability to make correct predictions—reckons about three years to separation, five or six years to divorce.
In the case of the marriage of Harry’s brother Prince William to Kate Middleton, only one of them is from a broken home. Prince Charles and two of his three siblings are divorced. Princess Diana’s parents divorced when she was 8, and her brother, the Earl Spencer, has two failed marriages behind him. Kate’s parents seem to have managed a loving and successful union and, perhaps, so will she. But divorce is about 40% genetic [Marriage and divorce: A genetic perspective. Beth Jerskey et al, Personality & Individual Differences, October 2010], so it becomes much more unlikely with Harry and the former Suits starlet.
Markle’s father has been divorced twice. Her mother has been divorced once. Her half-sister has contracted two failed marriages. And then there’s her half-brother, a divorced alcoholic, who has charged with holding a gun to his girlfriend’s head in 2017. [EXCLUSIVE: Shock for Harry’s girl: Meghan Markle’s BROTHER is arrested and charged with holding a gun to his girlfriend’s head ‘in violent row during late night drinking session at his flat’, Daily Mail, January 14, 2018]
Markle herself was already divorced at 32, after just 23 months of marriage, sending her ring back to her ex-husband via registered mail. [Is THIS the real reason Meghan Markle divorced her first husband Trevor Engelson? By Belinda Robinson, The Sun, April 20, 2018] Her divorce and her ruthless treatment of her ex imply low altruism and low impulse control, both key predictors of marital breakdown [Personality traits and mental divorce. Fani & Kheirabadi, Proceedia, 2011, 30:671-5].
Markle’s father’s side have shown themselves to be money-grabbing and dishonest, with her father setting up supposed “paparazzi” photos of himself to make a quick buck out of his daughter’s success. [, by Owen Gough, Express, May 16, 2018 ]
And Markle is also a very successful actress. The key predictors of success in the world of acting are altruism, extraversion, mental instability and being something of a fantasist who can escape into an imaginary world, a trait known as ‘Openness’ in psychology. [Psychological profiles of professional actors, by Daniel Nettle, Personality & Individual Differences, January 2006]
However, it’s already clear that Markle is low in altruism, so her success must be down to her extraversion (which predicts risk taking) and mental instability, which predicts a very rocky relationship. Naturally, these two traits also predict divorce—see Fani and Kheirabadi, above—which explains why Hollywood is so liberally peppered with multiple marriages.
Harry, of course, has shown himself to be an embarrassing risk-taker: the nude photos, the drug taking, the Nazi uniform worn to a costume party when he was 20. People from broken homes are prone to risk taking (see Personality: What Makes You the Way You Are by Daniel Nettle, 2007). Their childhoods have been unstable in a key way.
Of course, the one issue Ann Widdecombe couldn’t mention: Markle is half-black. But she should have done.
According to evolutionary psychologist J. Philippe Rushton, we all sit on a spectrum between a fast Life History Strategy (LHS), typically black, and a slow LHS, typically white and, especially, Asian). (See Race, Evolution and Behavior: A Life History Perspective, by J. Philippe Rushton).
A fast LHS is an adaptation to an unstable ecology in which you have “live fast and die young.” You grow up quickly, create only weak social bonds (people aren’t worth investing in, they could die any minute), and invest most of your energy is sex, in the hope that some offspring will survive. The single mom with kids by multiple dads selected because they’re muscular follows a fast LHS.
However, in a stable ecology, the carrying capacity will be reached so you end up competing with others from your own group. In this situation, you triumph by adapting a slow LHS, slowing down and investing more energy in nurture and less in sex. You create stronger bonds, because tightly cooperative groups are more likely to survive in a stable yet competitive environment.
LHS is strongly genetic and a stable, competitive environment selects for “quality” over “quantity.” In a stable, harsh ecology you could millions of offspring and they’d all die, due to being insufficiently adapted to the environment. But the one strongly-adapted child, heavily nurtured, may well survive and flourish.
Slow Life History Strategists are attracted to people who are genetically similar to them. This is because they are evolved to invest heavily in the nurture of their one partner and (consequently relatively few) offspring. They compensate for this by selecting sexual partners who are genetically similar to themselves, meaning they pass on more of their genes. People often marry those who, just by genetic chance, are equivalent of third or fourth cousins and in small societies they can literally marry such people [An association between the kinship and fertility of human couples, Helgason, A. et al. Science, February 8,2008).].
As Slow Life History Strategists are investing in their partner and offspring, they want to be sure their partner is committed so high altruism and impulse control become more important relative to evidence of good genes (e.g. beauty, facial symmetry). Also, such people are strongly adapted to their ecology so marrying someone very different will not only be a risk, and they hate risk, but will make the offspring less well-adapted.
Middling LH strategists tend to marry close relatives, meaning men can ensure that their “offspring” are at least related to them, and they strongly control females, through patriarchal systems such as the Muslim purdah, further alleviating their paternity anxiety. But life is too unstable, and people too untrusting, to simply marry for love. And such a system requires sufficient stability to know who your father (and thus your cousins) are.
People with a very fast LH are different again. With little interest in investment, they want to copulate with as many people as possible. So, if they are males, they want females who are symmetrical (meaning good genes and thus healthy and fertile) and young (and so fertile). Equivalent women, in their unstable lives, want men who are muscular and tall. But like slow LH strategists, though to a lesser extent, they will select for men who can invest something in them, because then their offspring are more likely to survive. So they are strongly attracted to the man’s wealth and status [The Evolution of Desire: Strategies of Human Mating., by David Buss, 1989].
But, whether male or female, they are also attracted to outbreeding. In an unstable ecology, where you’ve little adaptation to the environment, someone very genetically different (such as of a different race) could have such an adaptation; hence the “black goes for blonde” stereotype. And if that means taking the huge risk of marrying someone very genetically and culturally different then . . . so be it.
Consistent with this, there is a growing body of evidence that mixed-race children have elevated levels of mental instability, in comparison to monoracial children [Is miscegenation bad for your kids? By Emil O. W. Kirkegaard, EmilKirkegaard.dk, April 1, 2017].
This makes total sense. In a stable yet competitive ecology, mental instability is, to a greater extent, selected out. Fast LH strategists are more likely to engage in interracial unions leading to fast LH (mixed race) children who, being the products of two fast LH parents, are more likely to be mentally unstable.
And, equally in line with this, mixed race and even interethnic marriages are more likely to end in divorce than mono-racial or mono-ethnic ones. They will also produce children, like Meghan Markle, who are relatively genetically dissimilar to either parent, meaning the parent is likely to bond with less and invest less in the child, promoting a sense of instability in her, so elevating the probability of her divorcing later on.
It seems clear that Meghan is not especially close to either parent and doesn’t see them very much. It follows that both Meghan Markle and Prince Harry–by virtue of contracting a mixed-race marriage at all–are fast LH strategists who are thus high in the personality traits which lead to divorce.
And the whole basis of their relationship seems to be purely physical; unsurprising considering Meghan has dated a porn star and she’s so shallow that she’d rather invite celebrities (whom she hardly knows) to her wedding than the perfectly respectable diplomat uncle who gave Meghan her first job. [Meghan and Harry’s wedding and 10 key questions about how it became such a PR disaster , by Sarah Vine, Daily Mail, May 16, 2018]
Meghan and Harry met in 2016, when she was in a stable, two-year relationship with another man, even living together in Toronto. But Meghan broke up with him and eventually bagged a prince who was utterly besotted with her, bombarding her with text messages until she agreed to go on a date. [The ex-files: Who did Meghan Markle date before Prince Harry?, NowToLove.com.au, May 16, 2018]
And then there’s the age gap. In that women select for status, they tend to marry older men. Men select for beauty and fertility, so they tend to marry younger women. Clearly, Markle is marrying the ultimate high-status man, so she can easily trade this for any attraction she might have to men who are older than her, such as her first husband was.
It is, however, unusual for a high-status male to marry a woman who is older than him, especially when he is already 33 and she is three years older still. One possible explanation: Prince Harry’s instinct to outbreed is so strong that he’s prepared to marry a slightly older woman if that is what will permit it. Also, being mixed race, Meghan displays rare genetic combinations and a low number of double doses of mutant genes, making her particularly physically healthy. This “hybrid vigor” could be sufficient to compensate for her age.
Ann Widdecombe’s foreboding about Saturday’s wedding is, from the perspective of psychological research, not without good reason. Indeed, even Meghan’s violent half-brother Thomas, in his occasional lucid moments, has greater insight than the MSM does about these nuptials. In an open letter to Prince Harry, since retracted, he wrote that this is “the biggest mistake in royal wedding history” . [‘It’s not too late!’ Meghan Markle’s brother Thomas pens extraordinary open letter telling Prince Harry ‘this is the biggest mistake in royal wedding history’ – as he brands his sister ‘jaded, shallow and conceited’ , By Laura Forsyth, Daily Mail, May 2, 2018]
Prince Harry has never had to worry about money. But there is an extent to which his life hasn’t been easy: The spare, not the heir, losing his mom at a vulnerable age, combat in Afghanistan . . . even rumors about his true paternity. [WAR VETERAN Who is James Hewitt, did the ex-Army captain and Princess Diana have an affair and is he Prince Harry’s father?, By Gemma Mullin, May 18, 2018]
This manifestly doomed marriage will make it even worse for him in the long run. She’ll tire of him.
But we can’t say so. The bride is half-black, so the “will to believe” will be too strong . . . right up until day the inevitable split engrosses the UK tabloids.
English
Arabic
Chinese (Simplified)
Dutch
French
German
Hebrew
Hindi
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Russian
Spanish
Swedish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Maybe I’ve come down with dementia at 41, but if memory serves me correct, I believe a very bloody war was waged some 235 years ago that should have caused everybody is the U.S. not not care one iota about this idiocy.
A WHITE MAN WHO MARRIES A DARKER WOMAN IS OFTEN MENTALLY ILL.
Sir, you make some very good points and you are right, for the most part.
But one point I want to mention is that often every man always seeks a woman better looking than him. In terms of skin color, it means a lighter skin color.
Look at all the black men who go crazy at white women and would marry any fat ugly poor girl—as long as she has white skin.
I hardly ever see a white man with a black girl.
So a normal man will never feel attraction to a darker girl. There is something wrong with him if he does. I am sure there are studies proving this common sense.
So marrying darker for a man is marrying down. It is called downward drift. It is a sign of mental illness.
One day, Harry will wake up and think—what a crazy thing did I do. And then he will leave her.
Lots of boyfriends, this Markle, already 36, likely has had abortions, perhaps a few bouts of STDs, twenty years or more on hormonal birth control, this is the history of women on the divorce trail in Los Angeles in those circles with their and on and off ‘romances’ and one night stands. All this leads women in their mid thirties (and she’ll be forty IF they stay together before they get around to kids) straight to the IVF clinics for very expensive treatments. This is WHY it isn’t a good idea to marry older women if you want kids. It’s another reason women who want kids take care of THAT while they’re young. I smell a rat. Harry doesn’t WANT children. He could have his pick of beautiful hotties, young and fertile. Why THIS woman? Is he virtue-signaling his race credentials? Are the royals so guilty-feeling? Maybe he wants to get his marriage-and-divorce adventure over with before he’s too old to enjoy the groupie-bounty one more time.
These are zany in-breds after all, no one said they have to be stable or rational, they can afford not to be. But of all the women in the world for a guy in his position to go for, Ye, Gawds. The traffic on this woman, she’s a train station for Gawd’s Sake.
This is for the WOMEN, remember. If men were interested, Disney would buy the broadcast rights and put the wedding on ESPN. Women are into this stuff because after all, no one is asking THEM to marry. This is the ultimate Princess fairy-tale. THIS is what women were promised in, speaking of Disney, all those Aladdin/Prince Charming cartoons. Ken/Barbie, name the theme. The better part is the example being set. Markle is one of those who did the YOLO thing until her mid-thirties and found her Prince anyway. This will encourage more of THAT foolishness, too! Women get to live vicariously through this. As Don Corleone said, women can afford to be foolish. The YOLO lifestyle rarely works out, almost never. Women settle and head to the IVF with some poor mope that married them in their late-thrities, wilted. Now the ladies will think once again, YOLO, I’ll find my Prince later!
Besides, try to imagine the woman that cares their country fought a war with these people? What do they care? Wars are for the men to fight.
A Swedish dude never wants an Arab girl?
And she’s an actress! The last straw!
Haven’t we been finding out lots lately about what actrices do to get parts?
@Jim Christian
Good point. Hadn’t thought of it in those terms. Guess I have trouble thinking in the female mindset. Haha. Oh and spot on about the Disney/ESPN thing. I could definitely see that being a thing. Few more generations of tofu and we should get there.
Huh. My first reaction also was about 3 years.
No doubt genetic inheritance is a big factor in divorce. However the groom here is plainly not Prince Charles’s son, no matter what lies the Palace has promulgated to save face. Whether the son of James Hewitt or a stableboy, the known divorces in his background lie with the Spencers. His choice of bride inclines the investigator to the conclusion that it was the stableboy, and no telling what his genetic
history was.
This will be entertaining to observe, and may help bring about the downfall of the monarchy.
Never? No, not “never.”
It’s fair to say that sometimes stuff just happens.
To most people, anyway. A prince of England has a much wider set of options. So yes, a choice like Harry’s, under those circumstances, is odd; no matter how good the dark girl is, there’s always a better White girl, especially in a majority White country. Just look at how much better his homelier brother did.
I suppose what I’m getting at is, Harry is specifically after the dark bits. And no, that’s not normal.
As to his specific motivations, I have no idea. He could be acting out his resentments against his family. Or a childish need for rebellion. Or the exotic; maybe he’s living out his jungle fever fetish; Tarzan and the ape-woman. But I’m guessing it’s something.
That passes the shrinkological test; “deep down I know I’m not of royal blood, and here’s how I’m going to implicitly announce it, rather than explicitly saying so.”
1. That he’ll even have children is not that likely.
2. That if he were to have children they’d inherit the throne is quite unlikely.
3. His whole royal house is illegitimate anyway.
4. I’m an American, so thanks to some brave people a while back none of the above actually makes any difference to me.
(Thanks J Walbert for mentioning that last one.)
Well folks love is a blind stupid emotion, we’ll just have to wait and see. I wish them all the best.
Bill Maher, a guy I despise for the most part said it best. “I set the alarm so I would know when to wake up and not give a shit”. Why doesn’t he give a shit? “Because THIS Royal Wedding is a wedding between a B-List, out of work actress, marrying a man who will never be King, in a country that doesn’t matter anymore”.
Bravo. Bravo-Lingus.
“However the groom here is plainly not Prince Charles’s son”: is that ‘plainly’ in the sense of ‘neither logic nor evidence supports my point’?
Uncle Remus,
I like your thinking on the matter.
Binx B.
Lance Welton:
You just hurt the feelings of the racists here by reminding them of “hybrid vigor”
I expect many male British commoners will now follow the example of their favorite prince and seek out similar hybrids to mate with. British women have been doing it for decades already.
Dearieme, si probam requiram, circumspice. Look at Prince Charles’s (and his father’s) cranial structure. Look at Harry’s. Study their faces. The evidence lies before your eyes.
For those who say Harry clearly isn’t Charles’ son, here’s a photo comparison of Harry and his grandfather when Phillip was young.
I’ve never gotten how people question this. Phillip, Charles, Harry and William all bear a strong resemblance to each other.
What a load of crap. It happens all the time.
At least two of the white nationalist bloggers right here, Reed and Derbyshire, are married to non-white women. Tell them they are “mentally ill”.
The Mischling cries out in pain as he strikes you.
I think an important element is missing in the grotesque acceptance of “blackness” in the person of Meghan Markle … as well as the black bishop, black choir, and black entertainment at Harry and Meghan’s wedding. Britain is quickly becoming a “black country” with the massive immigration from, first, the Caribbean and now sub-Saharan Africa. Certainly, the British Establishment is also well aware that billions of their racial brother and sisters will soon be en route to Europe. One must quickly reach an accommodation with “blackness” to survive the inundation … and the sooner the better.
Eureka! The British Royal Family realizes that they need a “Black Princess” to sustain the popularity and acceptance of the Royal Family within Britain’s growing black communities. If Meghan had not shown up as she did, she would have to have been invented.
“Fear not, we are one of you! Just look at the “Black Princess” positioned so close to the throne. Soon, we may even have a “Black Royal Baby” to show you how close the Royal Family is to its black citizens.”
Nice try Lizzie … but no enchilada.
Please don’t get the idea that I’m against the British Royal Family. I love Britain … as the world’s largest and best kept outdoor museum. I love the red coats and bear-skin caps. I fantasize about what it would be like to live in Victorian England as I saunter through medieval castles and the imperial “haute” architecture of central London. No country does bands, colors, and pageantry as well as the British. Am I remembering correctly that Putin noticed the same thing?
It’s just that I consider the British Royal Family as an essential and functional part of that magnificent outdoor museum. They are irreplaceable. Nothing like this museum as a parody of the past exists anywhere else in the world. I find it troubling that someday we might see the throne encased in lions’ skins as King Bantu the First ascends the throne. That would rock me to the core of my Greco-Roman soul.
Reed’s not a WN. I was recently told to my surprise by respected commenter “Twinkie” that Derb isn’t either. Go figure.
Mixed-race marriage? Meghan Markle looks like a brunet Caucasian. If Harry and Meghan were not celebrities and you saw them walking down the street together, you’d see a handsome ginger with a beautiful brunet. You would NOT think “mixed race couple.” If Meghan married a coal black African type (like Obama’s father), how can you say that it would NOT be a mixed-race marriage? If you saw a non-celebrity Meghan walking down the street with a black African type, you’d wonder what the beautiful white girl was doing with that ******.
If Harry and Meghan have children, they’ll be as white as their father.
Muslims will take good care of the monarchy, don’t you worry. I look forward to the new Muslim majority in London kicking them out of the Palace inside of the next ten years, twenty maybe and turning the entire thing into a giant Mosque. The Mosque Of England. And YOU thought it was a church. And the West, Christianity. Another think. The Royals have a problem and it isn’t solved by Harry marrying a promiscuous, divorced, half-bred, B-Grade actress with ironed-out brillo and a Ghetto-Mama in dreds. The Barbarians are in their midst already.
After all, why should the poor Black Muslims from Africa live in such squalor when the Royals live in such splendor at the expense of the poor? I will look forward to the Royals being subject to the same sorts of barbarians at the gate as Israel. The problem? Unlike the Israelis, the Royals can’t kill them all after telling us all how wonderful swarthy diversity is. To the Queen I say, violent diversity for THEE, too! They aren’t MY people, these Royals. May they all rot.
To you she does. But not to many others. In other words, race is a social construct. Yes or no?
Btw, what would you think if you saw Meghan and her mother walking down the street together?
Lloyd, you’re killin’ me, Virtue-signal much? She’s Black! Yeah, sure, you mistook her for Lady Di turned-Brunette. You and Tiny-Dick.
Society is a racial construct.
There were several mistakes made in this column and replies: 1. Meghan Markel is not a hybrid but a mongrel. A hybrid is a cross between two closely related strains such as an Arab and a Jew or a Swede and a Spaniard. A mongrel is a cross between different races such as a Mulatto, a Mestizo, a Eurasian, etc. 2. Harry is not a legitimate son of Prince Charles but the bastard child of Princess Diana and a British army officer. Diana and Charles were estranged when Harry was conceived. Diana was a promiscuous slut who slept with many different men and later “graduated” to more exotic types including a Hindu doctor and an Arab millionaire. 3. Markel would not be an acceptable spouse for any decent man nor allowed into any decent family. She has been “married” at least twice, shacked up numerous times, and is reported to have slept her way into plum tv roles as a Hollywood harlot/actress. 4. Elizabeth II has disgraced her position as Queen of the United Kingdom and Defender of the Faith by committing blasphemy, heresy, and sacrilege as did the Archbishop of Canterbury in approving and participating in these nightmare Nubian nuptials that gave official approval to adultery, fornication, and miscegenation. They have both defiled and stained their high religious and secular offices by their behavior in participating in this mockery of a sacred and holy institution. Of course as head of state Elizabeth II already long ago signed legislation that legalized abortion on demand through the 7th month of pregnancy and legalized sodomy and homosexual “marriage” in the U.K. and the Archbishop of Canterbury has given his explicit approval to the same abominations.
It is incredible how depraved and degenerate the British royal family and their subjects have become. The people of Britain should have risen up en mass and demonstrated and revolted against this evil deed. Instead many actually celebrated this horror story. Having said that, I believe that May 19, 2018 marks the beginning of the end of the British monarchy and within a few years the Windsors will be dismissed from the trough as the worthless parasites and political puppets they have been revealed to be and sent into exile. In the mean time decent people of all races will spurn and scorn them.
Huh? The so-called church of England was founded on approval to adultery.
Part of the reason for Harry’s choice is because upper-class women, his natural mating group, can be a real problem. They are often spoiled and entitled. If one little thing goes wrong, they can throw adult tantrums. If they enjoy something, it often can be at someone else’s expense, and they can show a truly malignant glee at someone else’s troubles. They don’t HAVE to be nice, because they’re so rich and privileged that they never have to bother.
Privileged men like Harry have been raised with servants all their lives, and subjected to gross flattery. They get used to it. Part of the reason why a guy like this marries down is because he wants a wife who is grateful and happy to BE his wife. He wants her to think he’s wonderful all the time. From Harry’s point of view, he’s got a better chance at a good marriage if she seems nice and happy, or at least until she turns nasty.
The Church of England was founded on Henry VIII’s rage that as a powerful and wealthy Roman Catholic he wasn’t granted the annulment that was his due.
The Church of England was a breakaway church due to Henry VIII being denied an annulment by the Vatican as nearly everyone knows. That much is true. However the official stance of the Church of England is to oppose divorce, adultery and fornication. In Harry and Meghan’s case all this was thrown overboard. Had Meghan been lily white she would not be a suitable mate for any decent man much less a “prince”. The two of them have been living together for months prior to marriage and she was considered a promiscuous slut in Hollywood who slept around to get plum tv roles. She has also been married twice and shacked up several times. She kicked her last boyfriend out when Harry came calling. The whole affair is a shocking disgrace and an affront to all decent people. Most European royalty and the British aristocracy boycotted this monstrosity and let the Queen known in advance they would do so. Therefore the interracial couple chose to make their unholy ceremony a celebration of “diversity” and “pluralism” by bringing in loads of Hollywood trash celebrities, British White trash, and immigrants. And so it goes.
“So a normal man will never feel attraction to a darker girl. There is something wrong with him if he does. I am sure there are studies proving this common sense.”
Normal men feel attraction to attractive women regardless of race and ethnicity. That is a proven fact. Furthermore, it is NOT “mental illness” for a white man to marry a non-white woman.
“I am sure there are studies proving this common sense.”
Then if you are so sure why don’t you provide them. For if it was “common sense” then societies from around the world would be more adamant in expressing how race mixing is dysgenic and a sign of mental instability.
Only as long as she straightems her hair. I beleive she has also has had plastic surgery (compare pics of younger gir) to sharpen and europeanise her looks. She does not look particularly ebonised tho, and I suppose that would be a step too far at this stage. Nevertheless, the blacks in UK are ecstatic at her blackness which was emphasied by the after party shenanigans.
“So a normal man will never feel attraction to a darker girl.” What, no German or Brit ever took a fancy to a French or Italian girl? Don’t be absurd.
@Jim Christian
When he’s right, he’s really right. That’s good stuff.
Yeah, easy to remember, even through the fog of my girlfriend’s weed..
It may have been ecstasy at the rather more tangible blackness of the mother:
“There were several mistakes made in this column and replies: 1. Meghan Markel is not a hybrid but a mongrel. A hybrid is a cross between two closely related strains such as an Arab and a Jew or a Swede and a Spaniard. A mongrel is a cross between different races such as a Mulatto, a Mestizo, a Eurasian, etc.”
Definitional error on your part. Hybrid and mongrel are terms reserved for the animal kingdom, not human beings. She is of a mixed race.
“2. Harry is not a legitimate son of Prince Charles but the bastard child of Princess Diana and a British army officer. Diana and Charles were estranged when Harry was conceived. Diana was a promiscuous slut who slept with many different men and later “graduated” to more exotic types including a Hindu doctor and an Arab millionaire.”
If you are going to make that assertion, you must have specific evidence. So please offer the requisite proof here..
“3. Markel would not be an acceptable spouse for any decent man nor allowed into any decent family. She has been “married” at least twice, shacked up numerous times, and is reported to have slept her way into plum tv roles as a Hollywood harlot/actress.”
Another definitional error here–“acceptable spouse” and “decent man” may be interpreted in a number of ways, and not your exclusive criteria.
“4. Elizabeth II has disgraced her position as Queen of the United Kingdom and Defender of the Faith by committing blasphemy, heresy, and sacrilege as did the Archbishop of Canterbury in approving and participating in these nightmare Nubian nuptials that gave official approval to adultery, fornication, and miscegenation.”
No such crimes (blasphemy, heresy, sacrilege) have been committed here. Moreover, there is no law against the mixing of races in Great Britain, nor would God Himself object to the holy matrimony between two members of His flock.
“It is incredible how depraved and degenerate the British royal family and their subjects have become.”
You are projecting here.
“In the mean time decent people of all races will spurn and scorn them.”
Again, “decent people” need not fit your narrow view.
Ma’am, you really have no idea what you are talking about.
Harry’s bachelor pad was her ultimate “casting couch”.
That time was probably a lot more pleasant for her than when Harvey Weinstein “talked business” with her.
The key to survival of England’s indigenous people will be to imprison, possibly execute the leaders and lieutenants of the multi-culti British deep state/academia/big business diversity cult. That would be a purge that would make Stalin and Mao green with envy.
The current Queen will likely be in her tomb on the Day the muzzies take what they came for. However, the longevity in her family is remarkable, she could still be alive when the Day comes.
On the other hand, William and Kate have three beautiful blond/blonde children they very likely actually care a lot about. Not just a requirement of William’s office but appear to be a product of actual love. Will & Kate’s family will be very alive.
When the Day comes, Will & Kate will realize exile is not an option, nowhere to run what with diversity inflicted everywhere. Perhaps if the Queen can engineer a way to prevent Prince Charles from becoming King, William would hold that office when the Day of the muzzie arrives.
With the military background of William the chopper pilot, and his brother Harry, who took delight in offing muzzies in the ‘stans, they might imprison the multi-culti elites and lead their own loyalists to throw out the goons. Remember that Caribbean blacks have no connection with muzzies. For Harry’s part, he might work up an alliance of violent Caribbean blacks against the muzzies, seeing that he’s into brown sugar and so could ingratiate himself to that faction. Unless Harry abuses his octoroon and angers that people group via the tabloids airing the sordid story.
Tiny percentage chance of English survival but there may be hope for England, such as it is.
One can dream, anyway.
What quantum jungle blood is young Harry’s brown sugar cougar? No way she’s half. Quadroon? Octoroon? By appearance I’d guess the latter. Somewhere I read one-sixteenth. Can her lineage be traced? That would require knowledge of parentage of several generations. Not likely in her case.
I think it is now certain that Prince Charles is Harry’s father. Like father, like son – Harry could have had a fox, but he went for a hound.
Perhaps Harry was inspired by Mick and the boys . . .
Video Link
The real problem of when the Day of the muzzies arrives – they will gain control of the U.K. nuclear arsenal, command of the Royal Navy nuke subs.
Heck, the diversity cult in the U.K. probably looks forward to that outcome, with great glee.
“The key to survival of England’s indigenous people will be to imprison, possibly execute the leaders and lieutenants of the multi-culti British deep state/academia/big business diversity cult.
First, how do you propose these “indigenous folks” go about carrying out this plan? Second, to what extent will you participate? Third, if you do participate, why would you spare the children of these leaders and lieutenants who would inevitably seek revenge?
“That would be a purge that would make Stalin and Mao green with envy.”
In other words, you are advocating murder. So, basically, these two men are your heroes.
“The current Queen will likely be in her tomb on the Day the muzzies take what they came for.”
You have a very active imagination.
“Tiny percentage chance of English survival but there may be hope for England, such as it is.
One can dream, anyway.”
You are doing more than dreaming, dear.
That’s sexual harassment. We take remarks seriously these days; do try to keep up.
Imagining? Let me respond with one word of reality: Rotherham
Yes, Rotherdam is a tragic reality. But you and others are making the false assumption that ALL or MOST Muslims act in this manner. Furthermore, equating this situation as being the future of England, aka “the muzzies [will] take what they came for” is indeed showing an active imagination.
“That’s sexual harassment. We take remarks seriously these days; do try to keep up.”
Honey, you only wish.
Educate yourself: https://www.vox.com/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list
The time is running out on your disgusting sexism.
And your homosexuality is no defense:
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/20/fashion/glass-runway-no-female-ceos.html
???
It’s okay, there’s no one there. Calm down.
Ma’am, similar to the Salem Witchcraft Trials, and the Red Scares of the 1920’s/1950’s, the fringe groups are having their day. The Alt Right is underplaying, and the Hard Right is overplaying, these two issues. Certainly there is racism and sexism and homophobia in our nation, but the definitions and angles and circumstances are blurred, compliments of the Coalition of the Fringes. There is a snowball effect taking place. Allegations are only allegations until there is hard proof. That is what normies/the mushy middle focuses on, dear.
My first impression of the liaison was termination inside of 6 years. Having watched the cascade in my own family tree, she is in this for far different reasons than “love.” Neither one has brought anything to the relation but celebrity noise. Harry is unwittingly replicating the relations of his parents, and so is Megahand.
We know you’re gay. Stop assuming everyone else is too.
Witchcraft doesn’t exist. Sexual harassment does. And the new generation is not going to accept it. So watch yourself if you know what’s good for you.
“We know you’re gay. Stop assuming everyone else is too.”
Extremely happy, I am.
“Witchcraft doesn’t exist.”
Honey, it actually does.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Witchcraft#Contemporary_witchcraft
“Sexual harassment does.”
Not according to the Manosphere or Alt Right. Dear, try to keep up.
Good to see that you know the Rotherham rape gangs exist.
BTW, it is not just “tragic.” The Rotherham moslem rape gang was assisted by the local police that blamed and attacked the victims, and the local government that covered up the crimes. Cowardice, afraid of being called “racist”.
So the force of government effectively aided the moslem gangs to the serial rape of young English girls.
Also:
Newcastle
Keighley
Rochdale
Peterborough
Oxford
Aylesbury
Bristol
Colchester
Coventry
Dewsbury
etc., etc., etc.
Always moslems.
Surveys already show many moslems in the UK think violence by moslems against Brits is just fine. And the PTB keep importing more.
Stop denying your sodomitic tendencies. Admit your wrongdoing, repent, and move on. Don’t project.
Which are you? The age when your casual sexism was tolerated is over.
So you believe in witchcraft. Your bizarre superstitions are noted but irrelevant. Nevertheless, in that case you should have no problem with witch trials. Or with the sexual harassment allegations you think are similar.
“Stop denying your sodomitic tendencies. Admit your wrongdoing, repent, and move on. Don’t project.”
Honey, take your own advice. You’re only embarrassing yourself now. Do you need spiritual guidance?
“The age when your casual sexism was tolerated is over.”
We prefer blatant sexism, and it will be epic.
“Or with the sexual harassment allegations…”
Similar to hate hoaxes, sexual harassment is a figment of a woman’s imagination. Rule By Actresses, according to Mr. Sailer. Didn’t you get the memo?