The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Peter Bradley Archive
Right or Racist?
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
List of Bookmarks

The Dissident Right has begun to use art and literature to subvert taboos. This is a great tactic, but art and literature are not the only ways around the censors. One novel attempt to spread some truth about race is a trivia game called Right or Racist.

The thinking behind the game, according to the creator’s Kickstarter, was this:

America is a divided country. One side claims that America has become too racist, sexist and hateful, while the [other] side says people have become too sensitive and politically correct. I created this game to help shed some light on the truth, and try to determine once and for all, what is right and what is racist. I hope that this game becomes a tool for us to learn about one another and ourselves, engage in useful dialogue, and most importantly, to laugh at ourselves.

The game makes players answer questions that are often about race, but also feminism, homosexuality, politics, regional and national differences, and other controversial issues. Some questions, such as “Is a hotdog a sandwich?” are not controversial, and may be included to keep the mood light and fun.

The game sells for $26.95 on Amazon and arrived a day or two after ordering. It is also available on sites such as Walmart if you don’t want to support Amazon, which censors dissidents. The game is independently produced, but is polished and professional; it looks like a game you would buy in a store. Right or Racist is meant for 3-to-10 participants and comes with 300 stereotype cards, 100 player cards and 100 debate cards. You can also buy expanded packs to augment the game.

Stereotype cards present a statement, and players decide if it is right (true) or racist (false).

Debate cards are subjective statements that players vote on to determine if the statement is right or racist.

Participants use the player cards to vote on whether the stereotype and debate cards are right or racist.

How to play

Ten player cards are dealt to each player. The stereotype and debate cards are shuffled together in a separate stack. Each round, someone takes a turn as the “Big-It” who reads each card from the deck. All players choose “Right” (true) or “Racist” (false) for each stereotype that comes up. Once all players respond, the “Big-It” turns over the card to show the answer. If you are right, you get your player card back. If you’re wrong, you lose your card.

When a debate card comes up, all players again vote “Right” (agree) or “Racist” (disagree) simultaneously. After the vote, players debate and the majority vote wins. Again, winning voters keep their player cards and losing votes lose their player cards.

The game ends after someone loses all 10 player cards. He is the loser, and the player who still has the most player cards wins. Right or Racist comes with a scorecard that shows its lighthearted tone.

The core of the game is the questions themselves. Here is a selection.

There are also some cards that, at least on the surface, make whites look bad or imply that race is only skin deep:

As noted, not all the cards deal with race:

Some cards are more philosophical or meant to add levity to the game:

Subverting PC through comedy?

The creator of Right or Racist, Matthew Hanna, is a financial analyst who said he developed the game to spur debate. In a 2021 interview he said, “I wanted to get people talking, people from all perspectives because it’s not just left politics and right politics, it’s also black, white, lesbian, gay, trans, or whatever community people are from. Everyone has a different perspective.”

Mr. Hanna said the game can help us “learn about each other” and also have fun. But does someone familiar with “The Color of Crime” and the facts about national IQ believe the anti-white propaganda pushed by every institution in the US? Even several of the cards that make whites look bad might cause people to ask questions about per capita racial demographics and who is really overrepresented in certain crimes.

If Amazon reviews are any indication, Right or Racist is popular. There are 1,638 ratings with 67 percent giving the game 5 stars and 13 percent giving it 4 stars. It has an average rating of 4.3 stars (out of 5). Here are some sample reviews:

“Wow, did this game start some major debates. Major! It ended up being a political discussion and argument with conservatives and liberals. But it was all in good fun. Probably not a game you want to play with someone who is too sensitive”

“I purchased this game for my nephew’s birthday who is in his late 30’s. He has a smart-@$$ personality who pulls no punches but is a funny loyal friend to all! He has told me multiple times that this is by far the best gift he has ever gotten! On the way home from his party they played the game in the car with his good friend (who is colored) and his in laws! The entire 45 min was filled with laughter and splitting sides! Now mind you if you are easily offended this game might not be for you, but if your friend circle is a mixture of culture and colors and you all can laugh at your differences this too could be a fun addition to your game stash!”

“Great game, huge hit at this year’s Secret Santa! Not only is it fun to play (especially after a few drinks) but brings out a good discussion as well. Highly recommend! Beats “Cards against humanity” anyday, especially in this day and age.”

Not everyone is a fan. A leftist named Julia is not laughing:

“Once you realize this game is all about a certain political party as opposed to neutral facts, the game becomes a whole lot easier and not funny at all. Bought this game thinking it would make people check their racism and ask themselves “do I really stereotype?” But instead the answer is just part of a political formula.”

Julia is right to worry. Playing Right or Racist will educate any open-minded person, especially if this is done in a fun and entertaining way. Perhaps it will lead more curious players to research the issues raised in the game. They could well find their way to American Renaissance and other dissident sites. If you enjoy trivia games consider adding it to your collection.

(Republished from American Renaissance by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Race/Ethnicity • Tags: Antiracism, Political Correctness, Racism 
Hide 6 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. A better title for the game would be “Do you have the common sense the average American had in 1955?”

    • Agree: Bernie
  2. Bernie says:

    Seems a promising game.

  3. EH says:

    The one claiming that race is not genetic is not only wrong, it’s a deliberate lie, as can be seen from the phrasing of the prompt: “the Human Genome Project … proved that race could be identified in our genes”. The HGP did one genome, it couldn’t prove that, rather it was proven by the HapMap project and a vast amount of research since then. Obviously phrased to mislead.

    Then the answer card continues with the non-sequitur woke platitude claiming: humans being all labeled with the same species name means that they’re all the same race, and therefore can’t differ genetically. Say what? (Actually, Black Africans differ more from Australian Aborigines than our two most closely related species, chimps and bonobos, differ from each other. Further, due to small (~4%) Neanderthal and Denisovan mixtures in non-Africans and larger (~6%) mixtures of some unidentified hominin in Bantus, the true most recent common ancestor of humans is at least 500,000 years ago.)

    By the standards used for other primates, the different races are at least different subspecies, and in some cases different species. The game’s lie about this is blatant and calculated. There are also a great many other intentionally misleading claims and presuppositions in the game, starting with the premise that “right” and “racist” are opposites.

    • Replies: @ThreeCranes
  4. @EH

    Agree. And if you guess that yes, indeed the five countries with highest national IQ are located in the Far-East your card is not taken away. But if you guess that the five with the lowest IQ are in Africa, you lose, because one of the five is somewhere other than Africa.

    The important point is not knowing whether exactly five or four or whatever number are located in which continent, it is to have a general understanding of the overall shape of things. If a person who doesn’t know a thing about the distributions is wrong because they believe Africans have the highest IQs and Asians the lowest, then their net score is no different than someone who guesses that Africa is home to the lowest 3 and Asia to the highest 4. So this win/lose a card over a pedantic difference actually hides knowledge.

    I’ll pass.

  5. As someone with significant German ancestry, I’m bothered by evidence that suggest that this ethnicity may be overrepresented in creepy sex crimes. (E.g., Kürten, Gein, Corll, Dahmer, Meiwes, Fritzl.) But it is either true, or it is not. And if it is, so be it. No need to cover it up.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Peter Bradley Comments via RSS