RSS
Introduction
This two-part series suggests ways for whites to develop race-conscious communities that actively counter the contemporary Western media and government narrative. In it, we explore how whites can encourage traditional values, foster shared sentiment, and integrate their communities into broader society. We intend this series to help white men and women of any age, but we are especially interested in reaching adolescents and young adults, as they are the age groups most directly subjected to the so-called “Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion” programs of state and private institutions. We write from personal experience; many of our own efforts have enjoyed recent, notable success. We believe that the reader will be surprised and encouraged by the novel tactics of our overall approach.
Any questions or comments can be directed to [email protected].
What makes this era unique
Western history shows a remarkable post-Renaissance arc. In the 18th Century, new forms of thought and government conceived in the salons of Paris and the meetinghouses of colonial America challenged ideas about the relationship between man and government. This unleashed an unparalleled growth in productivity, which fueled a new round of European colonization around the world.
Today, the remarkable innovation and creativity that built the great expansive European empires — British, Dutch, French, Russian, Spanish, Portuguese, and German — have come under attack. The descendants of the men who built those empires — today’s white children — are blamed for the actions of their supposedly cruel forefathers and suffer more than most adults can imagine. It is up to the rest of us to ensure their survival.
In school, in media, in medical and financial services, and at every other level of society, the new anti-white dogmas disadvantage white men, women, and children. This anti-white movement follows decades of “critical” approaches to education, whereby long-held truths were overturned. Rather than celebrating the unmatched global prosperity driven by white ingenuity, we find ourselves now asked to apologize for it.
The new dogmas have supplanted the traditional figure of the aged white man made wise by a lifetime of experience with that of the wizened black woman, who draws not from experience but from an imagined, earthy spirituality innate to her and her race. The new “magic Americans” the dogmas revere can seemingly circumvent the laws of nature, rationality, and reason.
The obsession of the media and the arts with such characters and the deliberate over-representation of blacks and other minority groups in every profession tend to foster within whites a sense of inadequacy that undermines the self-confidence of children and neutralizes the potential of adults.
However, as society decays and the abilities of the median individual degrade, whites of high intellect, motivation, and value to their community will inevitably gain relative stature. For that reason, rather than retreating to enclaves or refusing to engage in communities at all, talented whites can empower themselves through their competence. Unlike South Africa, where the situation has progressed beyond repair, the United States is in no imminent risk of total infrastructure collapse, and the demand for both office workers and skilled laborers will be around for a long time. Keep in mind this thought if none other from this series: periods of degeneration offer competent men the fastest paths to power and success.
But do not doubt that this is a period of degeneration. At no point in history has a dominant group so willfully prostrated itself and turned over to others the very keys to its civilization. A sickness in our culture, a self-perpetuating disrespect for our heritage and an internalized distaste for anything exclusively in the white domain is driving this long retreat.
Commentators have offered many explanations for the stunning transformation of the West, including demographic change, the decreased role of religion as a mediating force in society, and the leftist push for critical studies. Today, Indian activists and their white fellow travelers are demanding what they call “land acknowledgments” — public admissions that a given parcel of land was stolen. If one were to suggest to our white ancestors who conquered North America the idea of such land acknowledgements, their response would be total befuddlement. We conquered the land; it is ours. Now, however, we seem intent on giving it away.
Yet all hope is not lost; whites do retain economic dominance, and many professionals privately acknowledge that “diversity hires” underperform those hired on merit. Moreover, even the most aggressively indoctrinating school cannot overcome a strong family in which the mother and father instill respect and pride in their children.
Respect must be for oneself, one’s family, and white culture at large. For many Americans, especially those whose ancestors came from Europe, the homogenizing forces applied during the First World War stripped them of their legacy culture in favor of a standardized American culture. There was nothing wrong with that; the United States has thrived on assimilating white immigrants into a distinctive American identity. Looking at historic records, one marvels today at the granularity with which whites were once viewed; today, one will marvel instead at the granularity applied to other races, while whites are lumped together with all peoples from the Iberian Peninsula to the Hindu Kush.
Pride must be in one’s heritage and one’s own achievements. Far too many white children are browbeaten into hating themselves, into devaluing their achievements, and into abandoning their capabilities in pursuit of antisocial behaviors. To inculcate pride, we must look outside the home, to the community.
This series outlines practical methods by which white activists can establish a community that simultaneously promotes individual self-improvement and facilitates the emergence of a white racial identity. Such a community must not be an island, and its members must be integrated members of the broader society while educating others about white-oriented values and norms .
The Warwolves
To understand one strategy employed by men of the West during one of our civilization’s bleakest periods, consider the Thirty Years’ War, which raged mostly in present-day Germany from 1618 to 1648. During that climax of the Counter-Reformation, various Protestant German princes clashed with Catholic Habsburg Imperials while surrounding powers such as the Dutch and Swedes joined on one side or the other. A complex struggle with intermittent lulls and many local changes of allegiance, the war killed over a third of the German population as rogue soldiers, mercenaries, and other marauders slaughtered each other and ravaged civilians. It was essentially a free-for-all, whose brutality and destruction were comparable only to parts of the Second World War, which had a much shorter duration.
A work of historical fiction of that era is Der Wehrwolf, or The Warwolf, written by the German natural historian and journalist Hermann Löns in 1910 and published a few years before his death in the First World War. Löns painstakingly researched the Thirty Years’ War and used historically accurate depictions to tell the story of Harm Wulf, a fictional landed peasant farmer of northern Germany who chooses to kill rather than be killed. After witnessing the pillaging of his village and murder of his young family by itinerant soldiers, Wulf joins his fellows in a fierce vigilante force called the “Warwolves,” which protects its remote homeland from inbound threats. They thus establish the roots of a peasant aristocracy. The once peaceful and simple farmers become competent guerillas, enriching themselves and their homesteads with loot from the military patrols they ambush and the thieves they hang in their forest as warnings to future intruders.
The 30 years of warfare require constant struggle and training from Wulf, his comrades, and their children, and though they are generally successful in skirmishing and intimidating their enemies, they lose many loved ones and see many farms burn. Nevertheless, they maintain their belief in Christianity and even in wartime build a beautiful chapel and educate their children with stolen books. By the time the war ends with the Peace of Westphalia, their community is thriving in the heath, with Wulf’s warclub hanging on the parlor wall of his Wulffstead, where it will remain for centuries as a totem of the deeds of the village’s ancestors.
We are not (yet) in such dire trouble as the fictional Harm Wulf, and most of us still face only indirect threats to our own well-being and legacy. But we must choose not to become a conquered people like those who lived in America before our ancestors came. We must band together and reforge our bonds. In this installment, we’ll begin to show you how to do this with people you encounter in everyday life.
Building a crew
The West is defined by its men, and Western men are in decline. Most abstract talk of that decline, voiced publicly by Jordan Peterson, focuses on the need for a “hero’s journey” involving changes to the individual man’s behavior. Unfortunately, Dr. Peterson’s advice often takes on a kind of mock-heroic character. “Cleanse the land of the invader” becomes “clean your room.” “Become a great warrior” becomes “stand up straight.” “Building an institution worth preserving” becomes “make friends with people who want the best for you.”
Such advice is not inherently harmful: standing up straight, cleaning one’s room, and making good friends are modest but worthy goals, and emasculated men would do well to adopt them. The problem arises when men set these goals as a ceiling, while they should see them as a floor. We face the destruction of the West, and instead of preparing men to steel themselves for a coming storm, we lecture them on how to clean their rooms. Such goals distract from actual problems. When a man defends his nation and home, he will clean his room, stand up straight, and find good friends because those are natural prerequisites to the larger goal.
The goal
The 1999 move Fight Club expressed a sentiment that prevailed among men at the height of the American Empire. That sentiment has since become a favorite of the dissident right: “I see all this potential, and I see it squandered. God damn it, an entire generation pumping gas, waiting tables; slaves with white collars. Advertising has us chasing cars and clothes, working jobs we hate so we can buy shit we don’t need. We’re the middle children of history, man. No purpose or place. We have no Great War. No Great Depression. Our great war is a spiritual war. Our great depression is our lives.”
That all rings true, but the world has changed. Men must still fight their spiritual wars, but no honest man can say that there is no great struggle or challenge or frontier to be conquered. The great struggle of our time is for existence: the existence of our people and a future for our children.
Some men, upon realizing that fact, breathe a curious sigh of relief, because the decline of the American Empire gives them a goal to fight for. It raises the ceiling from “clean your room” to “defend the empire.” This is not an artificial goal, and failure means annihilation.
As the threat of disintegration looms over the West, the politically conscious can see the threat on every street corner. Perhaps that is why, in our experience, the greatest concentrations of the politically conscious have been in cities. For the country dweller, white replacement and anti-white sentiment are still only talking points on television. The urbanite sees them firsthand.
The sleeping giants
When assembling a crew, you should certainly seek members in groups of people who already think the way you do, such as traditional religious organizations, political associations, and so on. There are a lot of us out there already. Beyond that, to build a substantial crew, you should try to win over the less-aware men, those often jokingly called “normies.”
Such less-aware men, like all men, seek out meaning, but they are acutely aware of the dangers in acknowledging the truth. The metaphorical “red pill” popularized by another 1999 movie, The Matrix, represents that acknowledgement. Postmodernist thinker Jean Baudrillard identified what the red pill teaches when he discussed the simulation that the modern world mistakes for truth. Simulation is a falsehood made indistinguishable from truth; to point out the simulation is to expose oneself as suspicious of the current order, as hostile to the simulacra of truth that modern authorities peddle. Taking the red pill gives one freedom, but it also means pursuit by the authorities. Men, in most cases, need only to be awakened, but awakening itself begets risk because it reveals the awakened as inherently dangerous to the established order.
In assembling your crew, you must recognize the types of men who cannot be awakened. These men are not sleeping; they are either comatose or dead. A comatose man thinks only of risk. You can show him the truth all you want; he will not turn on you, but neither will he accept the truth, because he is afraid. This man will awaken if the society is awakened, but otherwise he will remain asleep. The second kind of man — the one who is dead — is far worse. He is the man who delights in pedophilia, disease, suffering, and masochism; the corruption of children through vulgarity or drug addiction; and the desecration of the virtuous and holy. Such men will never come to your aid and cannot be awakened.
Fortunately, most men do not fall into these categories. Some (more than you realize) are already aware of the truth, and many will eagerly seize the opportunity to voice their version of it. Donald Trump’s presidential campaign in 2016 attracted many such followers. They were thirsting for fresh air, and Mr. Trump’s unique attitude satisfied that need. These men are not asleep; they are merely alone, and you can easily acquire them as members of your crew.
After acquiring your main crew among the like-minded, you will need to broaden it through the same method, but more slowly. Dropping subtle hints will inspire curiosity in most men. When they begin asking questions, remember that most are not initially your allies. They start out being merely curious, and as they are awakened to the truth, maybe then they become allies. Most operate on a false sense of reality and must abandon their false beliefs before accepting the truth. That is a choice only they can make. Do not be naïve. Someone who believes in inherent racial equality will not accept race realism without first understanding the basic facts about IQ. Otherwise, he will simply label you a bigot.
In the contemporary slang of young people, a “sperg” is someone, like a victim of Asperger’s, who is so obsessed with certain ideas that he becomes an annoyance to all around him. Don’t be a sperg. Make sure that your audience understands your words as you intend them. Being “based” in a way that does not communicate your love for the West and does not involve a call to action is counterproductive and stupid.
The simplest way to awaken sleeping giants is to show them that something tangible exists that is worth preserving and that you are not just talking about abstractions. You can do this through the natural bond of friendship, which will form easily as you save some of the poor “normies” that inhabit the West.
Being Normal and Having Fun: A Guide to Saving Normies
Probably the most ironic part of modern, degenerate social life is the complete absence of normality among so-called normies. To be normal in a mad world is to be mad. “Normies” seem normal in today’s world only because they match the general disposition of the group. By historical standards, however, they are by no means normal; they are merely all too common. To be considered a “normal” white man in a modern city is to be one of the following:
- A bland eunuch who consumes and complies with the ideology of social decay and, as a result, feels nothing
- An office drone who organizes his life around the virtues of productivity and the minimization of ever-more-petty units of risk
- A substance abuser who subconsciously realizes the tragedy of the world around him but neuters himself with drugs
- An emotionally hollow woman-chaser (in modern slang, a “simp”)
- A stable, fit, intelligent, and seemingly well-adjusted person whose skills involve pursuit of personal material gain rather than truth
In past times, many of these people would have been considered fringe elements of society if not actually mentally ill. Today, they are the standard products of the modern education system. Diverse though they are, they share a common goal: comfort. The eunuch seeks comfort in satiation, the office drone in security, the substance abuser in intoxication, the simp in sex and false love, and the seemingly well-adjusted person in financial gain.
Each of these lives can be comfortable, but none of them is fun, at least not for very long. The ideology that drives normies to favor sedation over genuine thought makes that impossible. To save a normie, expose him to fun.
In principle, that seems challenging. Most fun has an element of risk or danger, because it involves exploring the unknown. Everyone can agree that a rigged game is not fun, because everyone knows how it will end. Similarly, spoiled movies are not fun because they lack the element of surprise. The normie is conditioned to such circumstances because his favorite comfort is predictability — it involves that which is known, reliable, and safe. Because the normie prioritizes comfort, he will, by default, be resistant to most fun. The red pill for a normie, therefore, involves introducing him to enough fun to justify the corresponding loss of comfort.
You should begin by distinguishing between necessary and unnecessary discomfort. Because the modern normie focuses so much on comfort, you should prioritize having fun in areas where he is comfortable. It might be a Trump rally, a “White Boy Summer” barbecue, a fraternity event, a trip to the gun range, pulling a harmless but revealing prank on some hated local leftists, bringing the normie along to subvert and influence a Conservatism Inc. event, or otherwise involving him in a function of an organization you control. What this means will vary from one normie to the next, but most will have one or two things that they do not care about, even if the system says they should. A side effect of individualism and relativism is that degenerate near-conformity is easy, but total conformity is impossible. Almost every normie has a chink in his armor. Find it and you can use it to make him your friend and add him to your crew.
The gift of friendship
Most modern normies have few friends. Surveys reveal that, on average, a person has between one and five close friends (and that includes those of the opposite sex). More-social normies might have people they call friends, but who, on examination, lack the characteristics of true friends. A normie can thus have “friends” without friendship.
As an example, if a normie coworker works with you regularly and you do good work together, you might call that person a friend. You might drink with him, invite him to parties, and talk regularly with him about sports and other trivia. But that person still may not be a friend in the truest sense of the word. If you stopped watching sports, changed your job, or decided to stop drinking, you might no longer be in his comfort zone. Keeping you close would then be uncomfortable for him. Because you shared no deeper bond than superficial connections, true friendship never emerged.
One of the best ways to make friends, which is even admitted to by the mainstream, is to embrace ethnic bonds. After all, it is kinship that distinguishes the true friend from the mere friendly acquaintance. Real friendship requires a feeling of mutual trust that each person cares for the other as himself. Thus, friends invest in each other’s growth and resist each other’s collapse. Each feels that there is something — whether pertaining to heritage, political beliefs, or faith — within the other that should persevere. Just as a nation cannot be held together by unenforced laws, a friendship cannot be held together by mere mutual familiarity.
Your crew must foster friendship. What does friendship look like in a crew during the reforge era? It is the shared feeling of a group of men who acknowledge their leaders informally based on achievement rather than on fear or formal titles. The leaders in turn understand they have responsibilities to the crew, not a license to reign over them. All crew members share their achievements; they do not hoard them. Because members who display serious vices will discourage others from joining, those members must be shunned. Personal disagreements are kept private unless they threaten the crew. Older members give mentorship and material support to the young, who accept them gratefully so that they may grow within the group. Members suspected of improper behavior are first assumed to be mistaken rather than bad. Finally, members who move away remain friends because distance is not a factor in real friendship.
“Experts” in our atomized world claim that you can have no more than about three to five close friends. For today’s normies, that’s probably true. However, what the modern world calls “close friendship” was actually the default state of ancient tribes and villages, where everyone understood the necessity of setting disagreements aside for the common good. In those days, the community relied on the maxim that all men were brothers. Today, those who unite under the sort of friendship described above will know that they are safe among brothers and will find a form of comfort more fulfilling than the false comfort of the normie world. A normie carefully exposed to that fact, who is not scared away by unnecessary danger and risk, will respond to the friendship of the crew, realizing that these might be the first friends he has ever had.
Do this with enough normies and you will assemble a large crew ready to take on the task of saving your world.
Part II will go into more specifics about working with a crew and will be published next week.
English
Arabic
Chinese (Simplified)
Dutch
French
German
Hebrew
Hindi
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Russian
Spanish
Swedish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Jung Freud wrote this and it’s worth keeping in mind
It still amazes me how almost all such writers as this one allegedly trying to save ‘the white race’ by calling it to toughness and old-fashioned virtues rely on such queer shit as Fight Club. Of course, the Nazis loved Hermann Lons, and the Nazi Party was formed in a gay club. Almost 100% of the leaders of the Nazi Brownshirts, the Nazis most like the men in Fight Club, were queers, many of them pederasts. The whole 19th century German thing of nature worship of which Lons was an important figure was filled with nudist camps and nudist hiking and was also queer as can be. Hippie dippy nudist queers and Germanic war-worshipping death cults.
Do it and we’ll call those bastions of corralled whiteness “Reservations”. And just like the Indians, the whites that choose to live on these reservations will be marginalized and ignored.
The time for words is over, the time for action is now.
Get in the face of the alphabet people when they push perversity on the streets of middle America.
Encourage people that aren’t white to return to their place of origin.
When the government tries to intervene obstruct them and challenge them on everything tying them up in their own red tape, never walk away because there are more of you then them and if everyone challenged everything the malevolent system would grind to a halt.
Agitate, it is the irritant of the sand that produces the pearl.
What benefits does a “crew” offer?
If you aren’t talking about affordable housing and the other prerequisites for family formation. Your crew is just a online thread being recited aloud.
I would say start small by discussing bread and butter issues, then drafting pamphlets/flyers(the point isn’t the pamphlets or flyers but to get experience in working together and taking a step forward, no matter how small) and then experiment with running candidates for office, the point being getting experience in local politics.
AFFORDABLE HOUSING
DEBT JUBILEE
“Do it and we’ll…..”
Who is this “we” you refer to?
Just start by having a series of one-day strikes. Buy nothing, except necessities. Bring the system to its knees.
“Encourage people that aren’t white to return to their place of origin.”
If the economy goes down, these people will just leave on their own. Most of them are economic migrants. Many East Indians and Chinese don’t even bother getting citizenship because in their hearts they’re not Americans, they’re Indian and Chinese. Their governments don’t allow dual citizenship. Most South Americans and plenty of Mexicans would turn around too.
Going to a gun range or pulling pranks is going to have limited effectiveness. Getting together and punching each other in the face like in Fight Club is in the same category.
Ask yourself a question. Did Thomas Jefferson, Patrick Henry, Thomas Paine and George Washington get together and punch each other in the face like in Fight Club? No, they didn’t. They led a violent revolution. Before they did that, though, they and their predecessors like John Locke, Algernon Sidney, the Scottish Enlightenment thinkers and others developed an ideology that explained why everyone has a right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. When a government doesn’t protect these rights, it is morally justified to overthrow it.
There was a long preparation leading up to the American Revolution. It would not have worked twenty years earlier because the average American was not angry enough yet at the British government. It took more abuses of power to get them to reach that point. We are currently in the same stage. It’s too early for a violent rebellion. Things are not quite bad enough and the average American is not quite angry enough to support major changes. Currently, we can engage in persuasion to slowly win more people over. We don’t need to start from scratch in developing arguments. We can just go back and relearn the political philosophy that led to the American Revolution.
“It took more abuses of power to get them to reach that point. We are currently in the same stage. It’s too early for a violent rebellion. Things are not quite bad enough and the average American is not quite angry enough to support major changes.”
Well said, and I agree. When the pupil is ready, the teacher will come sort of thing, but not a minute before. People must experience a great amount of “suffering” first because suffering is what moves you. There must be a great weight on their shoulders. They must see it, feel it, taste it. If you try to talk to people about change before they are ready to hear it, they’ll just dismiss you, think you’re crazy. They’ll think you’re delusional, accuse you of “misinformation”, call you “racist”, whatever. People are experts at denial because they don’t want to feel pain; they want to run from it, want to smooth things over, want to tell themselves that magically everything will be okay. They must feel suffering at a gut level, they must feel a great loss. Only then will they listen.
Look at an addict. An addict will not straighten up until he absolutely has no other choice. It’s either the drug or death. And if you try to talk to him before he’s ready, he’s going to deny it, get very angry, lash out, blame everybody but himself. He has to hit rock bottom before he can see. Life has to become very uncomfortable for him, it has to humble him.
While the American people have been playing, they haven’t been paying attention to the tide coming in around them. They’ve been indoctrinated their whole lives to be “nice”, good people-pleasers, accepting, turn-the-other-cheek types. This is the persona they live by, the mask they wear. And what do “nice” people do when they’re slapped down for speaking up against something they object to? They retreat and feel shame and guilt, just like they’ve been conditioned to do. When they’re told to take a knee, they take it like the obedient little serfs they are.
Like the addict, the American people have lost their way. They have become unhealthy, self-centered, with no boundaries, no self-respect. They have lost sight of who they are. They have allowed their heroes to be denigrated, their statues to be toppled, their history rewritten, their Constitution to be shredded, and their minds to be taken over by propaganda.
Inside them sits a warrior, but in order to access this warrior they are going to have to (1) feel pain; (2) look inward, at themselves, see their own role in their demise. They will naturally try to project the resulting anger, hatred and loathing they feel out towards “others”, but this would be a mistake. It must be turned inward; they need to own it. Are they guilty of trying to be too “nice”, giving in order to get something in return, maybe a pat on the head? Are they guilty of being too addicted to their phones, to material goods, to their balance sheet, too busy trying to get ahead? If they can see the role they have played, their own self-centeredness, this will humble them. Only then can the warrior emerge.
The problem is that the ruling elite ARE keeping things going through monetary and fiscal manipulation. They don’t want the American people seeing the plans they have for them until the rope is around their necks. There is going to have to be some real pain, and that is the greatest teacher of all.
Do this every day, for the rest of your life. Just because.
Create ways for churches, tracts of wilderness, works of art, libraries, tools, etc. to be preserved and shared by your community. It’s also good to have some wealth-preserving assets and productive investments but–and I hate to sound like Klaus Schwab, but it’s just a fact–the less you own, the freer you are; the more dependent on the system and long-run useless consumer crap, the more a slave.
Own your faith, honor, heritage, dignity, and people. Let the rest go!
The descendants of the men who built those empires — today’s white children —blame each other for the actions mostly genocide and human trafficking of their supposedly cruel forefathers and suffer more than most adults can imagine. It is up to the rest of us to ensure their survival.
FIFY
Yeah, I see what you’re trying to say but I’m not buying it.
I mean, crews? What’s the end game? Because pointless social clubs of only whites are called a certain way by the jewish infested government, and therefore, persecuted.
How about teach whites to stop giving their money to the jew overlords oppressing them? Just with that we’d see the collapse of the enemies at a deep level. Then the rest would come by inertia.
“The descendants of the men who built those empires — today’s white children —blame each other for the actions (mostly genocide and human trafficking) of their supposedly cruel forefathers…..”
As Thomas Sowell says, slavery has been around forever, and still goes on today in parts of the world. Huge amounts of Whites were sold or kidnapped into slavery too. I’m still waiting for Alex Haley’s “Roots” myth to be corrected on the national stage.
I think Spielberg could direct a real humdinger of a movie out of this, provide the real truth of what happened, how the Africans rounded up other Africans, then sold their own people into slavery, name the Jews who bought them, traded them for guns and rum, transported them, auctioned them off, then became filthy rich. Maybe this part of history could just be a backdrop in an even bigger story, the “how to create a lie” story. Do you think he’ll be taking this on any time soon?
Feudal serfs were tied to a particular Lord’s land; they couldn’t leave town. Slaves were tied to their masters. Native Indians took slaves from other tribes. I’m sure there were lots of genocides in Africa too. Whites have killed off more Whites than they’ve killed anyone else. Irish girls were shipped off to the Caribbean to be bred with Africans. Imagine an adult African male raping a 13 year-old Irish girl. Why isn’t this story being told on the big screen? Because it doesn’t fit the narrative, plus it would expose the people who did this.
Ordinary Whites aren’t blaming other Whites. The media is telling them to, but they’re not buying it. The ruling elites have done all this, just as they’ve done throughout history, whether they be Mongolian, Chinese, Japanese, Indian, British, African, Arab, Russian, American, French. We’re just pulled along for the ride, then used when they need to place the “blame” somewhere.
Ordinary Whites need to feel proud of their achievements. A list of these achievements needs to be plastered everywhere, in every subway station, government office, library, on every telephone pole. And if the entitled who make a living out of trying to pull us down don’t like it, if they want to continue projecting their own deficiencies and jealousy onto us, just ignore them. You know what your ancestors have accomplished, and it’s a long list. Be proud.
…So does murder, so what in the hell are Kevin Gividen, Jared Thomas and Paul Kersey so worked up about?
It’s not rape, they were both farm animals, and the white owners got rich selling the resulting daughters to whorehouses.
What have You accomplished that you feel proud of? I for one have never taken credit for Michael Jackson recording “Thriller”, but to each his own.
Everyone except yourself?
White people need to wake up and see the writing on the wall.
Western man’s fundamental problem is ego, ego, ego = me, me, me.
Our demise will continue unchecked until we are humbled enough and threatened enough to actually wake up and start to really pull together as a single entity.
If this happens – nothing can stop us. Our enemies know this.
Yes, slavery had/has been around for a long time.
Abolishment of slavery and gender equality have been hailed as the greatest human progress. But wait, progress means motion and what is the engine of such progress? It’s certainly not ideology!! Why women were considered ‘inferior’?It’s simply: women lack the physical strength to handle ploughing animals, archery and edge weapons. Why slavery? Ans:If a feudal landlord needed labours to work on his farmland, the most economical way is to buy(/capture) slaves from the slave markets(/other tribes).
Steam engine was invented in early 1700s and first steam locomotive came about in early 1800s.
Why american slavery left such bad impression?
Ans:1)It was massive.
2)The trafficking took place across ocean.
3)Much of it(legal or not)happened during the first stage of mechanization.
…………..
The engine of such ‘progress’ is economics and technology. Which is cheaper:keep 100 slaves or maintaining a combine harvester? Is it more difficult to train women to use firearms?
2 other points:
–Many aren’t aware Lincoln had made it clear that the prime motive of the american civil war wasn’t about slavery abolishment. After the civil war, he attempted to send the ‘ex-slaves’ to Liberia and the caribbeans. That confederate assassin made a very bad mistake!!
” ..My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it..”
http://www.abrahamlincolnonline.org/lincoln/speeches/greeley.htm
–Slavery abolishment would’ve happened sooner or later, it should have been to black demographic advantage if slave trade could go on for another century…
Hail Wakanda !! (..just my jest..)
This is thoughtless nonsense and ahistorical. As Buddha said, almost all wars of conquest are useless and destructive because the conquered and vanquished people resent their new masters and plot and scheme to get rid of them and restore their previous ownership and rights. And, simply looking at history, that usually happens; the land reverts back to the native population. Wars are funded by credit and future money. They sequester and often destroy resources such as crops and buildings, infrastructure, etc.. This writer is not a thoughtful and insightful person. The low quality of his thoughts-at an adolescent level-will lead to mistakes, miscalculation, and ejaculative actions that will boomerang.
Americans are not Russians. American Whites are inferior to Russians. I would encourage these writer to take a research sabbatical and excursion to find out what it is about Russia and its culture that created such resilience and effectiveness, against enemies both domestic and foreign.