
Britain has now almost completely fallen to cultural Communism. This has become clear in the wake of the protests of August 2024, which were sparked by a 17-year-old second generation Rwandan immigrant murdering three little White girls, and stabbing many more, at Taylor Swift-themed dance class in Southport in the northwest of England. It was wrongly claimed online that the killer was a Muslim and a recent illegal arrival, which sparked the original riot which centred around Southport’s mosque.
But even when this was debunked, rioting, by the long-vilified White working class, continued. What had happened was symbolic of a problem which the Labour government began when it was last in power in 1997: mass-immigration, leading to unspeakable crimes such as the grooming and rape of young native girls, ludicrous house prices, overwhelmed public services and a feeling of being invaded. The killer was foreign, an ethnic Rwandan; he was not native English. In the panic that greeted the disorder, the new Labour government, elected, due to voter apathy, in a landslide only a month earlier after 14 years in opposition, made their loathing for traditional English liberties, and for the English people, shockingly clear.
New Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer declared that there was “no excuse” for the rioting. He had zero sympathy for the White working class because they are not part of his coalition of virtue-signalling elitists and non-Whites. They don’t tend to vote, except to come out and blasphemously vote for Brexit, and they don’t like mass immigration. They are thus, as Starmer put it, “far right thugs.” Being both of low socioeconomic status, and thus poor and unpleasant, they evoke visceral disgust in Starmer and are potential allies of his dangerous enemy; the populist right. It has been found that disgust is decreased by power, meaning powerless people who act in aberrant way strong induce disgust. This would be particularly pronounced if they were already an enemy and if a person felt negative feelings, like moral disgust, strongly because, being left wing, they were high in Neuroticism, the essence of which is negative feelings, and were especially sensitive, as liberals are, to moral disgust.
Consequently, democracy was, in a sense, suspended and not even very subtly. Starmer, the former head of the Crown Prosecution Service, must have known what he was doing but he did it anyway. Clearly shaken up by the intensity and fury of the rioting, he declared that anyone involved would be arrested, tried, found guilty and jailed. He further pronounced that anyone spreading false information online could expect the same fate. At a stroke, he had quite deliberately made clear that democracy is finished in the UK, at least for the next five years, until the next election. How so?
In English Law, as in the US, powers are separated as a bulwark against tyranny. A person may only be arrested if the police believe there is reason to arrest him, and if a person is wrongfully arrested he has legal redress, so they must be careful. He is only tried if the Crown Prosecution Service believes that a conviction is probable. When it comes to summary offences, where you can serve no more than a few years in prison such as public disorder, you are only found guilty if the magistrates believe that you are guilty, and you are given a jail sentence at their sole discretion.
In making the remarks he did, Starmer, the King’s Chief Minister, was knowingly corrupting this entire process. He was pressuring the police, the prosecutors and the magistrates such that none of these people, who are, ultimately, appointed by the government, could behave fairly. In other words, he had, through pressure, politicised the system, even more so than was already the case, with New Labour already having marched through the institutions since 1997, introducing Woke imperatives about commitments to equality, as Sean Gabb has explored in depth in his book, Culture Revolution, Culture War.
The result, it seems, has been people pleading guilty to vague offences such as “inciting racial hatred” for saying “Allah, Allah, who the fuck is a Allah!” because it’s quite obvious that the magistrates, under government pressure, will find them guilty, so their solicitor advises them to plead guilty in order to get a lesser sentence.
It should be noted that one of the causes of the riots is the flagrant two-tier policing in the UK. As I have explored in my new book Woke Eugenics, the Muslim clients of the Woke State can effectively get away with child rape, while those who offend client groups of the Left, such as over-excited, angry, working-class English people, can expect hefty prison sentences. The government and police deny this, with the chief of the Metropolitan Police, Sir Mark Rowley, recently being so confident it was untrue that he broke the microphone of a journalist who had the temerity to ask about it.
Worse still, and in order to stem the rioting and online inflammatory discussion, Starmer declared that it was crime to spread misinformation and that those who did so would be prosecuted and jailed. This is simply untrue, as he well knew. It is a crime, as of last year, to knowingly spread misinformation when this is likely to result in non-trivial physical or psychological harm to somebody. Thus, an absolute defence is that you did not know that the information you retweeted was untrue.
Nevertheless, in the UK now, a woman has been arrested in Cheshire for tweeting misinformation about the Rwandan killer. The head of the Crown Prosecution Service announced that you could be arrested for retweeting true information about the riots and, just before they subsided, with Elon Musk having taken the side of the English people, the left were talking about banning Twitter in the UK, placing the UK alongside North Korea; unsurprising considering the roots of New Labour in supporters of Brezhnev.
Commentators in both the UK, such as libertarian Sean Gabb, and elsewhere have been remarking on the Neo-Communist tactics of Britain’s Labour Party for many years. In many ways, they shouldn’t be a surprised, though they have been presented with such slick, manipulative PR that they seem to remain as such. At the height of the Cold War leading figures in this government, such as sometime Home Secretary Jack Straw, were members of the Communist Party or groups sympathetic to it, with all which that implies about their views.
They eventually rejected economic socialism, in order to get elected, but leftist hatred of tradition, resentment of success, natural treason (where you identify with another group, a “disadvantaged” one, over your own, in order to seem kind and so manipulatively gain power over your own group), and the leftist mental instability that leads to paranoid authoritarianism had never gone away. (I explore all of this in Woke Eugenics if you want the related scholarly papers).
After a week of rioting, Starmer met with his “Cobra” anti-terrorism team and devised a plan. Suddenly, it was announced on all UK media that there would be 30 “far right” protests in one night, with the implication that the government were frightened that anarchy would be the result. This was obvious a massive hoax, a Psych Op, as Nick Lowles, the head of the “anti-Fascist” group “Hope Not Hate” admitted. It was obvious, really, because the protests were all going to be in multicultural areas, including the “Gay Capital” of Brighton. The result? Huge protests by the extreme left, and by violent Muslim activists, in favour of destroying Britain and declaring in all the newspapers that the “true British” had turned out to defeat the “far right.”
What was the point of this? It was to break the morale of the far right, buoy the regime’s clients (foreigners and violent White Woke extremists who act as its enforcers) and, hopefully, fool the British people. Of course, like a Potemkin village, it has done no such thing. It has only shown the British people that, as with Communists, the regime has no choice but to blatantly lie, as the problems with their Multicultural, Postmodern, moralistic ideology — social disintegration, collapsing trust, racial conflict, appalling crime, grooming and rape of native girls, an atmosphere of fear, de facto Islamic states within England — become ever more clear, in the hope that the inevitable collapse, in which everything they are invested in falls apart, is postponed. Until that time arrives, as with the dying years of the Soviet Union, tyranny and deception will be ramped up more and more.
Until the 1960s, America saw itself as the true England, more English than England, as Eric Kaufmann has shown in The Rise and Fall of Anglo-America. It was the heir to pre-Norman Conquest, Anglo-Saxon world: without social class, high on liberty; democratic. England has been conquered anew by the French in the form of its worst idea: Postmodernism; that truth is subjective, all cultures are equal and challenging tradition is a moral duty.
Maybe it is time for “England West” to rescue its brother across the sea again, just as it did in World War II, but to rescue it not from Continental tyranny but from itself. After all, like Iraq, it is a tyranny, its leaders abuse its people; it is an enemy of American liberty, it is toying with adopting policies associated with China and North Korea (America’s adversaries) and it has quite a lot of oil . . .
Good article thank you Dr Dutton.
A true Englishman? Something impossible, let us remember that these islands were the first victims of white European colonization and the natives were practically exterminated.
Those “natives” were also White. The migrations in Roman times were Europeans moving to other parts of Europe. No different than the Bantus [West African blacks] who originate from Nigeria moving to Central, East, and South Africa during the Bantu expansion, yet are still considered native Africans in all parts of sub-Saharan Africa today. Or Native American tribes conquering each other which they have done countless times. None of that makes them not “Native American” even though the Cherokee tribe, Seminole, and many others did not exist 500 years ago.
The English people are mostly of proto-Celtic ancestry btw, meaning their roots go back more than 5,000 years on the island. Their ancestors built Stone Henge. There was no extermination.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_history_of_the_British_Isles#Anglo-Saxons
Is Dutton trying to be ironic, in a cynical and quasi-humorous style? Is that it?
I’d ask, what the hell does ‘democracy’ even mean, anymore? Ezra Pound had it right when he wrote that Democracy is now currently defined in Europe as a country run by Jews.”
Democracy is the problem, Ed. In any case, the once mighty British Empire is over, overtaken and occupied by its colonies. Its politicians concerned with fighting the Jew’s enemy, Russia.
And now they are at war with their own people? What else is new? How can anyone feel sorry for them? Like the old Viv Stanshall quip: You fought in the last war to make people like yourself, impossible.
To suppose that America should ‘rescue’ the Brits from their government? That’s not even funny in any context. Look at what is going down in the US? Cops beating up and arresting people protesting Jews killing women and children hiding in hospitals. Then bulldozing their bodies under the rubble.
Pro-tip for Dutton: China and DPRK are not America’s ‘adversaries’. The former just wants to sell stuff, and the latter just wants to be left alone. How do they threaten the US?
What a stupid mishmash of an article. Instead of an American occupation of Britain (like Iraq? Is that supposed to be ironic and funny?), he should have called for storming the Bastille and bringing out the guillotine. More appropriate, given the situation. And if it happened it would be totally unironic, but certainly funny, in its own way.
When similar outbursts occur in China, the precinct cop calls them in and warns them. No biggie. After 3 reoffenses, however, it’s a different story.
The only remote chance the English have of wrestling free of their globalist elite masters is when their goons wake up to the fact they are enabling and speeding their very own demise and are willing to trade a paycheck for the future of their posterity.
Scientists claim that everyone migrated from a spot in Africa, so there are no “natives” in England or the USA. But if the term is “native born” then the English are still the majority in England. I’ve concluded that only native born persons should be allowed to vote. This would end these migration disasters and political games.
Video Link
Agreed, but an improvement on that would be ethnicity.
Do what most countries do, and restrict nationality (passport, political rights and government employment) to ethnic nationals (or at least one parent ethnic national + born in the country).
Problem solved. Ethnic non-nationals remain foreign residents (like the many in Switzerland) and don’t expect more.
Of course the Jewish plutocracy would fight it tooth and nail – but that’s because it would work. Excluding minorities from power (including them).
The English don’t deserve to be rescued…they voluntarily gave up their rights (and their guns) to Fabian communists…And the UK does not have lots of oil, with the North Sea production on its last legs…
Can someone unravel this sentence for me?:
Thanks!
“neo-communist tactics”
no, simply the acts of a muderously anti-White Zionist Occupation Gubmint,
authorized by a shabbatz goy PM with a Jew wife.
and BTW, ED: nothing will change for the better when the Jew-owned Tories win the next Zionist Uniparty fake election.
Power decreases the moral condemnation of disgust-inducing transgressions
What I think Dutton is saying (badly): when someone commits a transgression or offense that normally produces feelings of disgust (and moral condemnation) in others, more disgust (and presumably stronger feelings of moral condemnation) is elicited when a relatively powerless person commits that transgression or offense than when a powerful person does.
These bullshit scientists are wrong about everyone originated from some spot in ape land africa.
Your right about that they did let the dipshit Fabian socialists destroy their country. But here’s the truth. There are certain laws that run through the Universe and one of those laws is, if you make stupid decisions you are going to have bad results.
British men like all western men were duped into fighting each other by the degenerate jew.
there will be serious consequences for your behaviour, and you will not find it funny.
When it comes to being a race traitor, nobody does it better than White people.
Whites are the absolute best race traitors in the entire world. I’ve honestly never quite understood it really. Someone on here told me to read a Kevin McDonald book about why Whites behave as they do, that is, they will actively work against their own racial interests, such as keeping their race and culture preserved so it lasts into the infinite future. Why do Whites do this?? Why are they so prone to acting this way?
Whites willingly embrace their own genocide, all in the name of “feel good” ideologies, such as, (amongst many others): “anti-racism”, “allyship”, “multiculturalism”, “non-White/minority rights”, and “LGBTQ+ rights”, all of which have been programmed into their White minds by their jewish overlords. Hell, you can even add “Christianity” to the list, (I wonder what Whites/the West would look like if they still retained their Pagan roots?). In fact, these aforementioned ideologies have totally supplanted Christianity as the default way of thinking among most Whites in the West today.
The White police and politicians in England are some of today’s greatest race traitors. These people feel no shame or guilt as they actively work towards their own race’s destruction. It’s both horrifying and hilarious to watch at the same time.
Nick Lowles of Hope Not Hate had another walk-on part in the drama. He tweeted that a Muslim woman in Middlesbrough had been attacked with acid.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/08/05/nick-lowles-hope-not-hate-apologise-tweet-acid-attack/
If treated the same way as other propagators of incendiary information, Nick Lowles would have been arrested, convicted, and sentenced to three years in prison. But we have two-tier policing, and it is considered acceptable to incite retaliatory violence, as long as it is against the correct group of people. It is sickening.
10% of the English are Huguenots.
No one who commits such a badly written sentence should be allowed to vote.
The true English will do NOTHING,
until they realize the problem is Jews.
And being members of freemasonry and being allies of Zionists will NOT help.
If you think this is just a problem of Labor Party then you are a lost cause. The Torys stopped being conservative aeons ago. Now they worship Israel.
It’s legal in the UK for government agents to commit crimes as part of their intrigues thanks to the Covert Human Intelligence Sources (Criminal Conduct) Act 2021.
Yes, we do have a Stasi and worse now.
The cultural commies will have a short reign before being replaced by the Islamists, who will rule for the next 30,000 years. There is no resistance to the imposition of Islamic law by Britain’s elites, and in fact they are facilitating it. (There was talk recently among the elites of instituting blasphemy laws. Incredible, but true.) Since the elites have vastly more power than anyone resisting them, the march to Islamic law is proceeding smoothly.
How’s your Arabic, Starmer?
I stopped reading when I got to this.
The reason was I had recently come across this:
https://www.instagram.com/reel/C-e_n2PooXc/?igsh=YThjZGR1bGViZGM1
I am expecting Reform to be much more important in the next election, assuming there is one.
Would electing Reform solve our problems? probably not, the bureaucracy is infiltrated to the gills with globalists. Farage (assuming that he was leader) would be in approximately the same situation as Trump in his first term, media vilification, legalistic obstructionism and sabotage could be expected.
I don’t think we have five years to resolve the problems anyway. Even if we haven’t been nuked, starved or poisoned by then, five years of Starmer would probably lead to national collapse and disintegration. Economic collapse is probably the best case scenario.
The guy making that video is missing the real reason for public outrage.
We are not fools, we are capable of guessing that grooming gangs are numerous and likely to include people from every imaginable ethnic origin.
The outrage was based on the fact that the police knew about the Rochdale gangs but declined to take any action against them because those gangs were Asian and they were scared of being called racist. I seem to remember that upwards of a thousand women, many of them underage, suffered abuse at the hands of those men, that was allowed to continue for over a decade !!
Ethnic communities, if they truly want to be part of a nation, must either adequately police themselves or agree to being policed. One cannot have a civilised society without the rule of law and that law should apply to all.
What is happening at the moment is that ethnic minorities are getting the softly, softly treatment while ethnic British are getting “the full force of the law”. Two tier policing does exist, it is real and it even makes sense pragmatically, it has been a thing for at least four decades now to my certain knowledge.
We get it, police investigations of minority communities are potential career ending political dynamite and those communities are often uncooperative in any case so it just isn’t bang for the buck. Pragmatism is one thing, complete abdication of police duty is another.
Error alert. I should have said Rotherham, rather than Rochdale when I said…
https://www.forbes.com/sites/rogerscruton/2014/08/30/why-did-british-police-ignore-pakistani-gangs-raping-rotherham-children-political-correctness/
Rochdale had similar issues and I confused the two because of the similar names, my bad. As you can see from the link, I was not exaggerating the seriousness of the issues, the reverse if anything.