A new Christianity? Well the one we have is not exactly doing the European based peoples well. Do I want to go back to Catholicism, days of yore, when everyone would fight any opposition at the drop of a hat? I don’t think so. Think of the first aggression principle. Screw turn the other cheek, but don’t initiate the aggression. Christianity is the most universal religion on earth (Islam is universal, but Christianity has it beat because Islam is a total way of life which regardless of its spread to non-Arab countries, has retained an Arab ethos) Christianity can be a way of life -if one is a strict “orthodox” Christian, but for most it is not. The universality of Christianity really got underway with colonial conquests (especially with the Spaniards and Portuguese in the Americas wanting to save native American souls) The French did the same, the English less so (because of their style of colonization-at least in North America) We have to bring all those black, yellow & brown people to JEEEEEEZUS. Later on in the colonial process (mainly British & French) saw Christianity as a step up. One could get an education through Christian schools, one could better familiarize oneself with the colonial structure to get something of a position (learning English or French). Although whites kept themselves largely apart from the natives in those days, the stage was being set psychologically -through Christian univeralism, if the chess piece were moved about a bit – the non-Europeans would be seen as equals. It took a while. Now add on the “other” universalist ideology -Marxism. No further explanation.

Turn the other cheek… Why not, Crescite et multiplicamini (Be fruitful and multiply)? Why not…

Turn the other cheek was only intended to be interpreted as a direction for the individual. If someone walks up to you and starts hitting you, then feel free not to defend yourself. But if someone starts hitting a defenseless person, a child for instance, then you are morally obliged to come to that person’s defense, because someone can choosenot to defend him or herself, but we cannot make this decision for someone else. Extreme pacifism is an immoral position.

They grew weak without Christianity. Why? Because they stopped believing in what they had believed earlier…

Religious faith fosters a sense of national identity, which is why Greeks remained distinct under the Ottoman Turks and Jewish diaspora did not assimilate. Nationalism can also fill this role. However, the concept of the White race is not sufficient to unify the people, because it includes too much variation among potential adherents. Few people are going to be willing to fight and die for Whiteness.

Towards the end of the article, the author associates Polish and White people, as well as White people and Christians. This seems too optimistic, and he would be better served by focusing on Polish and/or Catholic.

In reality, the white race never understood Christianity, it inherited it from the Roman Empire and with immense ignorance it used it for its economic expansion, thinking only of the pockets of the most privileged to enrich them even more.

And beginning with the Indigenous Genocide, with the sword and the cross, they prostituted Christianity and everything that came after has been an anti-Christian farce of veneration of wealth as the only God.

And from what it seems they plan to continue killing and stealing as much as they can.

After the crash and the Greater Depression the Christians and MAGA will be there to pick up the pieces. They have survival skills.

Opposition to Christianity is a Bolshevik thing. If you are opposed to Christianity you are with the Bolsheviks even if you are two stupid to know it.

Also. If you are opposed to Christianity and you make your case from scripture you are hopeless. You should just STFU.

Muscular Christianity is back! The ghost of Teddy Roosevelt is pleased.

Christianity was the best that men could devise within the limitations of ignorance, magical thinking, and superstition of the ancient cultures that spawned it. Today, we object to it because we see the Christian system of belief and morality as simply capricious. It fails to comprehend the true expansiveness of our human nature, and is simply wrong in its understanding of the natural world and its workings.

“why did Muslims not relocate to Europe at the time when Christianity was Christian apart from the military invasion of Spain?”

The author apparently has not heard about the tragic conquest and utter distruction of the Roman empire (a.k.a. Bizantium) and the Chrisrian kingdoms of Serbia and Bulgaria by the muslim Turks in the 15th century. While Turks did not fully relocate to the Balkan peninsula, they successfully converted to islam a sizeable fraction of its population that ruled their Christian relatives with utmost brutality. Some 400 years later these wretched nations were freed of their occupiers, either by their own heroic struggle (Serbs) or by the military actions of the Russians (Bulgaria) and the British (Greece). Lamentably, the liberation was not complete because the Austro-Hungarians and the British sided with Turkey in their fight against ortodox Christianity and some historically Christian parts of the Balkans and Asia Minor remained under muslim rule.

“why did Muslims not relocate to Europe at the time when Christianity was Christian apart from the military invasion of Spain?”

The author apparently has not heard about the tragic conquest and utter distruction of the Roman empire (a.k.a. Bizantium) and the Chrisrian kingdoms of Serbia and Bulgaria by the muslim Turks in the 15th century. While Turks did not fully relocate to the Balkan peninsula, they successfully converted to islam a sizeable fraction of its population that ruled their Christian relatives with utmost brutality. Some 400 years later these wretched nations were freed of their occupiers, either by their own heroic struggle (Serbs) or by the military actions of the Russians (Bulgaria) and the British (Greece). Lamentably, the liberation was not complete because the Austro-Hungarians and the British sided with Turkey in their fight against ortodox Christianity and some historically Christian areas of the Balkans and Asia Minor remained under muslim rule.

Just read the novels by Fyodor Dostoevski, they explain most of the questions you have raised here.

However, the concept of the White race is not sufficient to unify the people,

The concept of White was concocted by spiritual Jews specifically to bleach out the differences between individual Christian races. No Anglos, no Saxons, no Basques, no Scots, no Dutch, no Tuscaners, nor is there male but only female, all one under Constitution and Legislature. (There is black tho, but it’s also a mystery-meat blend, saying Bantu and Pygmies and Cushitics are all alike.)

The merchant levelling instinct you were talking about earlier. Homogenize and simplify the market, specifically so that they might all buy your product.

But if someone starts hitting a defenseless person, a child for instance, then you are morally obliged to come to that person’s defense, because someone can choose not to defend him or herself, but we cannot make this decision for someone else.

Why isn’t it the parents’ responsibility, instead of mine?

This article’s author has nostalgia for what in fact cannot be recovered, and an unfortunate conflation of warrior mentality (good) with pleasure in torment and barbarism.

Even tho our fellow European-heritage people who still hold on to Christianity, need to be treated with respect – religion is a human need, after all – the rest of us still need to face that:
– There is no ‘saving’ Christianity from the collapse of its legitimacy, in a world where most Christians are already non-European
– Christianity always will work as intended by its Jewish creators, as a back-door for Jewish supremacist power-seeking

If one truly READS the Jewish-authored Christian ‘scriptures’ one sees no end of barbaric horrors: Genital mutilation of baby children … the sadistic terror of ‘eternal hell’ … genocide of women and children, burning women alive, and all the rest. NOT the ‘word of God’ but demonic sadism.

As Egypt’s Ashraf Ezzat has written, the Abrahamic religions are all creations of dysfunctional desert tribes in a small region, tribes who are extremist, belligerent and of low culture.

To fill the ‘God-shaped hole’ in our hearts, we need a Western reincarnation religion, drawing from the well of ancient India, with the meditation practices that let a person directly experience how this life is not the only one … but filled out from our own ethnic cultures, as South and East Asian religions encourage all peoples to do.

It is through Christianity that Judaism has really conquered the world. Christianity is the masterpiece of Judaism.
– Ernest Renan (1823-92)

The most notable Jew to have boasted of Jewish invention of Christianity, and why it was a crime against Europeans, Marcus Eli Ravage (1884-1965):

The worst nightmare for me is to see billions of people deceived by religions , be it Christian or other.
The problem lies in the culture of the nations, in it there is traditional religion attached.
Education starts at home so most people when young are introduce to basics of religious beliefs.
So even when they are old they stick with it, believing or not.
They follow religious upbringing more or less throughout their life’s, traditionally but not as a way of life.
The second biggest issue with religions is interpretations.
The author wrote this:
Why am I mentioning all this? To show that the problem lies not in the Christian faith, but in the feebleness of the mind and general effeminacy on the part of Christians, and also in the clever doings of its enemies who exploit selected biblical passages and foist their interpretation on the churches that are foolish enough to accommodate them.:
My question for you Jacek is, is your religion free of human interpretations.?
I know that Catholic Church is especially full of doctrinal interpretations , which causes millions of people to commit abominations to God through idolatry and praying to people (saints) , these things are forbidden by God.
Christ Jesus said that John 4:24

“God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth.”
So let us be not of feeble mind but trust The Lord and only Him

Why isn’t it the parents’ responsibility, instead of mine?

Is a moral obligation the same as a responsibility? We can ignore a moral obligation, and it certainly is the parents’ responsibility. If the cost to the individual is low enough, then most people would act on a moral obligation. Holding the door open for an elderly woman? Probably. But if someone has a weapon and you are pondering being a hero, then that’s a whole different story.

It’s a fine point that you make. Each person is, in theory, rational and able to make his or her own decision

Is a moral obligation the same as a responsibility?

The parents can ignore their responsibility too, it just results in their kid getting wrecked.

Yes, a moral obligation is a kind of responsibility. The key feature of responsibility, in this sense, is that you will be punished for not upholding it. If you ignore a moral obligation and aren’t punished, it either isn’t moral or isn’t an obligation.
Perhaps you mean ‘obligation’ in the sense that you would think less of someone who doesn’t? That is indeed a punishment, although I hesitate to call it moral. Ref: Plato’s ring of Gyges. If nobody can see me not helping the child, then I suffer no consequences?

Rather than a guy with a knife, I’m imagining I’m a Palestinian Christian who sees a Jewish kid getting absolutely kicked around by another Jew. Am I obligated to help? For what reason?

To fill the ‘God-shaped hole’ in our hearts, we need a Western reincarnation religion, drawing from the well of ancient India, with the meditation practices that let a person directly experience how this life is not the only one … but filled out from our own ethnic cultures, as South and East Asian religions encourage all peoples to do.

I’m very surprised to see this. I happen to agree. But it’s not going to happen. Christianity will have to do. I don’t presume to advise Christians. But if I did I would advise them to get their heads out of the Hebrew Scriptures and into the NEW Testament.

Christianity requires the belief that Jesus (if he existed) was the literal son of God. To the rational mind, this is a complete fairy tale. It’s really a sad state of affairs if one believes that the only way White people can survive is to swallow the fairy tale. Christianity, founded by Jews, and a devious spin-off of Judaism, is crumbling of its own internal contradictions.

Christianity, esp. Western Christianity, further destroyed itself when, among myriad other shortcomings, it dropped its 19-century opposition to genital mutilation (aka circumcision), allowing Jewish immorality to gain supremacy. The writer mourns for a lost cause. I mourn for it too. But not for the same reasons. Old-fashioned European Paganism, (which was once the dominant belief), over worship of an omniscient Sky God who impregnated a Virgin, might have been a better way to go. But it was crushed by the armies of oppressive Christianity. Onward Christian Soldier!

Fair enough. Henceforth, we should speak of the White races, the Black races, the Oriental races, etc. Of course, it should be pointed out that the White races were once known collectively as ‘Christendom’.

It’s really a sad state of affairs if one believes that the only way White people can survive is to swallow the fairy tale.

White people can survive without Christianity. My point is they will not give up their religion nor should they. Railing against Christianity is counter productive if you are trying to bring people together to change things. We are in no danger from Christians. We are however in mortal danger from the atheist globalists (think WEF or Jews if you prefer) who would themselves be Gods.

Yes, I often use the term the Christian races.

Unfortunately an even more accurate term is the Communist races.

When Christianity was at its best and its strongest in Europe, it kept the Jews down

This is completely false. The medieval church, along with the nobility, protected jews against the peasants they exploited because the jews gave them more favorable loans in addition to their theological kinship. They were fine with the jewish custom of gheottoization because they knew the European commoners would massacre them if they were in close proximity. Every time there was a pogrom, it was spearheaded by the peasants and the parish priest was always out on the street exhorting the enraged townsfolk to show mercy (and the nobility sent knights to quell the uprisings, of course). Expulsions occurred when European royals didn’t want to deal with a peasant uprising against their Jewish exploiters; kings like Louis IX were aberrations.

If not for Christianity, jews wouldn’t have survived a generation in Europe. But they thrived, while racial Europeans were massacred for not worshiping Yahweh. Some antisemites those Christian monarchs were!

” (which by the way exposes what a debilitating effect Protestantism had on the White man’s world).”

Protestantism MADE the modern world &; made the White man master of it; putting an end to the Dark Ages in Europe & the enslavement of the Common Man by a corrupt & repressive Medieval Church more concerned with worldly affairs than spiritual. Historical Protestantism IS Christianity in its purest form. The heretical Church at Rome has been trying to catch up ever since, Sadly, some contemporaneous Protestant churches have lost their way & become too worldly again, embracing wokism. This is even worse than Catholicism. All Christians need to reunite & restore the Faith based on premises from the historical record as these : (https://apostles-creed.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/67-sixty-seven-articles.pdf)

Jacek Szela: “Detractors of Christianity among the ranks of white activists seem not to notice that they are playing into the hands of those — yes, Marxist, leftist, and liberal circles — which hold Christianity in low regard and would like to see it gone or transformed into something Christian in all but name.”

LOL It seems strange that a defender of Christianity should admit that Marxism, leftism, and liberalism are things “Christian in all but name”, but there it is. On the face of it, Szela agrees with Spengler, who wrote:

All Communist systems in the West are in fact derived from Christian theological thought … Christian theology is the grandmother of Bolshevism.
– Oswald Spengler, in The Hour of Decision

But maybe we should just chalk this contretemps up to bad editing. In an attempt to be clever, perhaps Szela has only tripped over his own eloquence.

Jacek Szela: ” … the Church has been infiltrated and taken over. … Is it still Christianity?”

This is a familiar refrain from defenders of Christianity. Infiltrated! LOL But could there be a more ludicrous defense? After all, Christianity actively recruits from among its enemies. It welcomes them in so long as they swear allegiance to the two-thousand-years-old zombie Jesus. It’s as though the fire department should do its recruiting from among arsonists! “Who’s starting all the fires?” the firemen now wonder. LOL It’s puzzling all right.

The issue of whether Christianity evolves or not is an interesting one, however. Can a system of moral law evolve? It seems clear that Christianity is such a system, and that it does in fact evolve. That would seem to be the only way to explain some historical facts, such as the changing Christian perspective on slavery. The Jesus of the Bible seems ignorant that slavery is a sin. He never condemns it, and his apostles frankly aspire to be his slaves. It was only gradually that it fell into disfavor among Christians in Europe, and later still that a slave trade in negroes was abandoned as morally wrong. Even as late as the Dred Scott decision of 1857, the US Supreme Court held that slaves had no human rights that “a white man was bound to respect”; they were considered only property. It took the Civil War, fomented by Christian activists in the North, to resolve the issue in favor of the negro’s human rights. Nowadays, I think it’d be incredibly rare to find a Christian who will say that a negro has no human rights that whites need respect. What would Szela say? He apparently thinks he’s one of the “real” Christians, unsubverted and uninfiltrated. What’s his opinion, or any of you reading this who think you are one of the “real” Christians. Do YOU think that slavery is a sin, or that slaves have human rights?

If so, perhaps you should tell Jesus. It will help him evolve, as you have done.

This Article is so historically inaccurate, it is the mirror image of ” 16 years old ” neo pagan Christianism bashing.

I do not know who the author of this paper is, but from the name, if it is his real name, he might be Polish.

The Poles , as a rule, are very stupid when it comes to discourses about Christianity. Usually a Pole cannot tell “Christianity” from “Polish Nationalism”, and has a very very distorted and nationalist view of the World History.

This Jacek one is completely drunk on his own propaganda. “Keeping Jews down”? Really? In fact, Jews were his grand-grandfathers’ masters precisely because Catholics bred Jews in Poland to be the middle class on top of the polish peasants.

“Keeping moslems out”? Thats even funnier, because the Sarmatian lords that subjected Jacek ancestors to the brutal serfdom, were basically fringe Turks and Tartars freshly converted to the Catholicism.

In fact, many many Christians, that is, a vast majority of Orthodox Christian strongly preferred the Turk to the Catholics tyrany. In fact, Orthodox Christians suffered much more at hand of the barbaric Catholics crusader pillagers than from enligntened and noble Moslems.

So no, Jacek, Poland is not Christ, as you sincerely believe, and it is not the Centre of the Struggle between Good and Evil. It is just a european backwater country that has no monopoly on Christianity.

And saying “Christianity is evolving”, probably meaning, all is a-ok with Vatican2, it made a Polish Pope to happen, it is just .. well, so Polish.

Christianity is now a majority non-white creed.

That should be enough evidence that Western Man has moved on from his superstition and forward to understand that any “wisdom” coming out of the Middle East will be at his expense.

Good reason to jettison the whole of it and look to our own race for the power patrons we will need for the future.

Lol, the tragic conquest and utter destruction of Constantinople was due to Catholics attacking and pillaging it. The grand success of the Turks in Greece, Serbia and Bulgaria etc. was due to the fact that Catholics occupiers from Venetia and Swabia etc. were nastier and more backward.

Orthodox Christians preferred the Turk to the Pope, for a reason.

Get rid of the “judeo” in Christianity and Christianity will do just fine.
Question:
Why do Evangelical Christians love Israel and Netanyahu?
Answer:
It’s all about the shekels.
That fat bastard Hagee is a prime example. A close second is that of those who preach the “prosperity gospel” insisting that “God” will make you wealthy if you just “believe”…which couples directly with judaism which celebrates the “God” of money and wealth, strictly jewish concepts.
Every Christian or Catholic sect that promotes judaism is not following any of the precepts of Christianity or Catholicism.
Judaism is the exact opposite of Christianity or Catholicism and must be recognized as such. The concept of “judeo-Christian” faith must be abolished.
Is it possible to be a Christian or Catholic without falling into the error of promoting the jews?
Absolutely YES.
However, it requires a recognition that both the Old and New Testament Bible is NOT the “inspired word of God” but is a text which does have some usefulness in guiding human behavior. “Sola scriptura” is a false doctrine along with the Scofield “translation” of the Bible which cemented the jews to the status of “our elder brothers”.
The Old Testament “God” is a vengeful “God” who has to constantly remind “his people” “who is boss”. Punishment was always a part of the equation.
Contrast that with the New Testament “God” who is a “God” of mercy and forgiveness…two different concepts, indeed.
Keep in mind that jews have never repudiated slavery or genocide. Both abominations are still a part of jewish doctrine. It’s all in their talmud.
The worst people of any faith or belief system are those who “wear their faith on their shoulder” who insist that “their way” is “the only way”.
Now for differences between Roman Catholicism and Protestantism…
Protestants, especially Baptists have a “hard on” when it comes to hatred of the Catholic Church. They consider Catholics to be an “enemy” and the Catholic Church to be satanic…
Protestants take a small part of the Bible and concentrate on one small aspect ignoring the rest of the “message”. A good example of this is the practice of Baptist “snake handlers” who handle poisonous snakes, relying on the “spirit” to “save” them.
Protestants believe in “sola scriptura” in which the “written word” of the Bible is sacrosanct, despite the Bible being written by men, quite often with their own agenda. Even a shyster Scofield got his biblical licks in, elevating the jews to that of “our elder brother” and absolving the jews from responsibility for the crucifixion and death of Jesus Christ despite vitriolic jewish hatred of Jesus Christ which exists to this very day.
Protestants also believe that “good works” have no bearing on “salvation” which I have a hard time with).
In protestant doctrine, one can be a grievous sinner all of his life, hurting and destroying others, and on his deathbed profess a belief in Jesus Christ and will automatically be “saved”.
Even if “good works” have no bearing on the possibility of “salvation” they can’t hurt…
Catholics do not worship saints. Those individuals who have lived exemplary lives and have proven themselves to be worthy of veneration by being good examples of what ALL human beings should emulate are recognized by the Catholic Church.
The Pope is (supposed to be) the “spiritual leader” in our temporal realm, nothing more. The pope has no business commenting on temporal issues of which he knows nothing about.
Yes, the Catholic Church has problems, and will always have problems, but has still done more for humanity than most.
The first hospitals, educational institutions, and charity organizations in the middle ages and beyond were founded and run by the Catholic Church.
I stand by my statement that the “Vatican II Ecumenical Council” was a power grab by jews and protestants and was detrimental to the Catholic faith.
Fortunately, there are “old-line” Catholic parishes that still exist, despite efforts by “Novus Ordo” clergy to stamp them out…

Another incoherent babble, ignoring all the historical facts , just speak Polish for Saint Norvid’s sake.

Got your protestant panties in a twist? Oh well…

What if the [another Jew] in question is in fact their parent? I assume I’m not obligated to help in that case?

As an outsider, how would I know?
What if I start to intervene, and then they falsely claim to be the parent? As an outsider, how should I verify this?

Orthodox, if you please.

Which is close to the Brits church, so kind of allied with the prots.

But you do miss the point. The point is, not enough just babble “Poland is Christ, we made deal with the Devil by being both Catholic and Freemason, and we won”.

By the Saint Mitzkiewitczscztch, please do explain why your Catholic Poland bred all the Jews and no Protestant or Orthodox place ever did.

If you return, I have 2 questions which I’d be very interested in hearing your thoughts on:

1. Isn’t it possible or even probable that some very wealthy and powerful people have had self-sustaining technological cities built underground as a contingency? And if so, wouldn’t this make the end of the technological system practically impossible?

2. You have claimed that violence is a beneficial course of action, but do not commit violence yourself, why is that? This is not a criticism by the way.