
Eyes, nose, mouth, chin, cheeks, brows — all of those words are home-grown English. But when you put them together and view them as a whole, they turn French in the word “face.” That doesn’t happen in German, where home-grown Augen, Nase, Mund, Kinn, Wangen, Brauen come together as home-grown Gesicht.
Faces, Races, Spaces
German is less of a hybrid language than English and I’d like to know how that affects the psychology of native speakers. The geometry of the two languages became much more different after the Norman Conquest and that must affect the way that minds move through them. If languages had faces, the German and English languages would look much less alike than the German and English peoples. I mean the real peoples: the white Germans and the White English. I’m a racist, which means I’m also a “facist” (i.e., face-ist). I think race is a biological reality with enormous — indeed, decisive — consequences for culture and civilization. And races are inescapably connected with faces. Evolution in different physical and cultural environments has sculpted faces in different ways just as it’s sculpted every other part of the human body, from the bones to the brain.
The outcomes of those different evolutionary paths are just much more obvious in the face, which is, after all, the most obvious part of the human body. That’s why so much of our brains is devoted to reading other people’s faces (and to controlling our own). Our intense interest in faces arises from the important information that they carry. Not that leftists like us to see some of that information. They hate the way we can tell Swedes from Somalis from Samoans at a glance. Sadly for leftists, it’s clear that facial is racial is spatial, because races and their faces have evolved in different places and taken different routes through genetic space. That affects more than the geometry of faces. The color of faces has important information too, both in subtle ways, like the intra-racial differences in the face-colors of men and women studied by the maverick anthropologist Peter Frost, and in gross ways, like the inter-racial differences in the skin-color of Blacks and Whites. When we look at a face we’re looking not just at geometry — the shapes and relative sizes of noses and mouths and eyes — but also at chemistry (which is geometry at a microscopic scale). The color of hair, skin and eyes says something about the chemistry of the body. You could say that a human face is like the cover of a book. It gives you imperfect but important information about the contents of the skull: the geometry and chemistry of the brain, and hence the psychology and cognition of the face’s owner.
The leftist miracle of an unbreakable brain-barrier
That’s why facism is an essential part of racism: the differences between the faces of different races convey real and important biological data. But leftism denies the significance of faces just as it denies the existence of races. Leftists can’t deny that evolution has sculpted faces, but they do deny that evolution has sculpted the brains that lie directly behind those faces. Or rather, they say that the same evolutionary forces that made the faces of Swedes, Somalis and Samoans so different were somehow prevented from working on the brains that lay directly behind those faces. After Homo sapiens evolved in Africa, the skull became an absolute and unbreakable barrier, sealing the brain off from all further evolution as Homo sapiens migrated into environments as different as the tropical, ocean-kissed islands of Tahiti and the icy, oxygen-starved plateau of Tibet. Bodies changed, but brains didn’t. That’s why the Psychic Unity of Mankind is a central axiom of leftism. According to leftists, the brains of all humans, Blacks and Whites, men and women, Finns and Fijians, are capable of exactly the same high intellectual endeavor. We have exactly the same cerebral hardware and we run exactly the same psychological software. Only racism and sexism can explain why Black women have never won Nobel Prizes for Physics or Field Medals in mathematics. Racism and sexism are also shamefully and solely responsible for the myth that White women are more attractive and more feminine than Black women.
Well, that’s what leftism says, but leftism is a lie. Our faces are different and so are both our brains and our beauties. If we’d evolved to read the geometry of internal organs as easily as the geometry of external faces, we’d be able to distinguish between the brains of Blacks and Whites at a glance. And not just the brains but everything else in the body, from the liver to the lungs. To the dismay of leftists, artificial intelligence (AI) can now do exactly that: it can assign internal organs to different races with very high accuracy. As I described in “Biology is Blasphemy,” leftist scientists have been “shocked, confused, and frankly horrified” to discover that AI can read the reality of race in X-rays and other medical images. As one researcher despairingly concluded: “There is no easy way to remove racial information from images. It is everywhere and it is in everything.”
Ugly, asymmetrical and alien
But why would we want to “remove racial information from images”? Well, I don’t and I hope that you don’t, but lying leftists do, because they want to deny reality in pursuit of what really matters to them: power and the chance to scapegoat non-leftist Whites for the failure and criminality of Blacks. Take this photo of ten vibrant faces that recently appeared in the British media:
The faces are ugly, asymmetrical and alien (ugliness and asymmetry go together, in fact). If they were the covers of books, then the books would be in the genre of true crime. And they’d be autobiographies, because the faces are those of a violent armed gang who “used guns, knives, hammers and crowbars to terrorise [their victims] before fleeing in a fleet of stolen vehicles.” Leftists would say that the men are completely British and that they’ve been turned into violent criminals by living in a White-supremacist society that refused to nurture their innate intelligence, civility and potential for high achievement. I say: “Face the facts and see the facts in the faces.” And the facts are that both the faces and the brains behind the faces have followed very different evolutionary paths to those of the genuine White British. Nine of the ten men are obviously Black and Blacks haven’t been through the process of genetic pacification, whereby strong and stable states have weeded out genes for crime and violence in their subjects by executing and imprisoning violent and lawless men over many centuries. On the contrary, Blacks have evolved in environments where violence and selfish, impulsive behavior are advantageous.
An Albanian face in an otherwise Black gang: the torturers, rapists and murderers of White schoolgirl Mary-Ann Leneghan
The one White face in the gang isn’t the product of genetic pacification either. The White-looking thug is called Ihab Ashaqui, which may well be a misspelt Albanian name. Like mountainous Chechnya — which produced the Boston Bombers for America, a head-chopping young art-critic for France, and the most furious fighters of Islamic State — and mountainous Georgia — which produced the Machiavellian mass-murderer Josef Stalin, mountainous Albania has bred men who would rather feud and fight rather than obey laws. And so Albanians behave more like non-British Blacks than British Whites. That may be why Ihab Ashaqui appears in an otherwise Black gang just as Indrit Krasniqi, another Albanian, appeared in the Black gang that raped, tortured and murdered the White schoolgirl Mary-Ann Leneghan in 2005. Unlike the murdered Black and now-sainted schoolboy Stephen Lawrence, she has long been forgotten by the leftist media. After all, her death revealed the truth of how dangerous Blacks are to Whites, whereas the death of Stephen Lawrence can be used to promote the lie that Whites are dangerous to Blacks. Leftism hates truth and loves lies.
Jewish faces in the highest of places
And leftist lies killed Mary-Ann Leneghan, because she spent her short life saturated in pro-Black propaganda designed to persuade her that Blacks were cool and fascinating and perfectly suitable for White girls like her to be friends with. That’s how she ended up raped and tortured for hours, then stabbed to death in a park as she pleaded desperately for her life. By any objective standard, her murder was far worse than the murder of Stephen Lawrence. And it involved misogyny and patriarchy at its most brutal and femicidal. But leftists don’t apply objective standards and they don’t genuinely care about misogyny, patriarchy and femicide. They apply the standard of “What advances the cause of leftism and helps leftists like me gain more power?”
But it’s because leftists love power that they’re careful about the faces that front their parties. Like the Blair government in Britain, the Biden government in America is disproportionately staffed by Jews, particularly at the highest levels, and follows an anti-White Jewish agenda of open borders and plutocratic enrichment. But in both cases the Jews who ended up running things chose a bland and unthreatening goy to front their election campaign. After all, if the sinister Jew Merrick Garland had been the Democratic candidate for POTUS, even the dumbest goyim might have felt a chill down their spines and understood that voting Democrat was not in their best interests.
And how do I know that Merrick Garland is sinister? Well, it’s there in his face. If that punim were the cover of a book, the book would be a torture manual or a grimoire of Black Magic. This is me being facist again: the faces of Jews often give me the creeps. And I’m not unique in that. In Western culture there’s a long and shameful history of Jews being represented as or likened to vampires, ghouls and other evil creatures — see Andrew Joyce’s “On Jews and Vampires.”
Cannibals, vampires and Princes of Darkness
At least, leftists and Jews call it a “shameful” history. As both a facist and a racist, I’d call it a healthy and appropriate response to the alien and predatory nature of Jews, which is plainly visible in their faces and body language — and also audible in their voices. In America, the bloodthirsty Jewish neo-con Richard Perle is nicknamed “the Prince of Darkness.” By no coincidence, the Machiavellian Jew Peter Mandelson received the same nickname in Britain (Mandelson was one of the hostile Jewish elite who pulled Blair’s strings). Elsewhere in Britain, the Jewish politician Gerald Kaufman was nicknamed “Hannibal Lecter” (after the cannibal serial-killer created by the writer Thomas Harris). And the Jewish politician Michael Howard, who headed the so-called Conservative party and failed to beat the bland and unthreatening goy Tony Blair at the 2005 election, was nicknamed “Dracula.” One of his own shadow-ministers, Ann Widdecombe, said of Howard that “there is something of the night about him.”
Again, I think this is a healthy and appropriate gentile response to the alien and predatory nature of Jews. But healthy and appropriate racial responses are abhorred and abominated by media and business in the modern leftist West. Kanye West, the Black American musician, has learned that very strongly in recent months, as Andrew Joyce explained at the Occidental Observer in “Jewish Troubles with Uppity Rappers.” West is very intelligent and articulate by Black standards, and he’s very courageous by White standards, because he’s said things that no White of remotely comparable status has dared to say. The ugly and sinister Jew Jonathan Greenblatt, head of the totalitarian Anti-Defamation League (ADL), says that Kanye needs to be crushed because he’s accused Jews of having the power to crush their critics. The ADL is pro-LGBT and anti-BTG — against Beauty, Truth and Goodness. It’s no coincidence that Greenblatt is ugly, evil and a liar. As the great Catholic writer Hilaire Belloc said long ago in The Great Heresies (1938): “[T]here is (as the greatest of the ancient Greeks discovered) a certain indissoluble Trinity of Truth, Beauty and Goodness. You cannot deny or attack one of these three without at the same time denying or attacking both the others.”
You can see Belloc’s words brought to life in Jonathan Greenblatt and in the ugly, evil and truth-hating faces of American antifa. But the converse of his words also applies: to promote any one of that “indissoluble Trinity” is to promote the two others. It’s also no coincidence that Whites have evolved the brightest and most beautiful faces, created the best art and the least corrupt and criminal societies, and pursued truth so successfully in science and mathematics. Faces are themselves works of art, sculpted down the millennia by the aesthetic choices and preferences of men and women competing for mates.
The specialness of European female beauty
But the anthropologist Peter Frost argues that male choices were particularly important in Europe, where women competed more intensely for fewer men in a much harsher and colder environment than that of tropical Africa. That’s why the color of women’s hair and eyes is most varied in Europe: women benefited by standing out from their rivals in the competition for mates in an individualist mating system in which personal preferences rather than family strategizing was paramount. Indeed, Frost says that “eye colors … have diversified only in Europeans and more so in women than in men. Specifically, the range of eye colors is more evenly distributed among women: they have the less frequent colors more often and the more frequent ones less often.” The eyes are windows to the soul, so it’s said. They’re certainly a window into evolution and the gem-like eyes — sapphires, emeralds and more — of European women are the result of a distinct and uniquely beautiful evolutionary path. But what have Jews, whose faces and brains are the product of a different evolutionary path, done with the beauty of European women? They’ve turned it into the drug and dross of pornography. The vast majority of the alien-faced young men migrating into Europe have undoubtedly seen White women in Jewish pornography and had their rape-culture strengthened and stimulated by it.
Again, leftists don’t care. Their pro-migrant propaganda studiously ignores the predominance of rape-inclined young men and pretends again and again that non-White migrants are helpless women and children. We often see crying women and children in the pro-migrant leftist media. It’s facial propaganda that’s also racial propaganda, exploiting our instinctive sympathy for distressed human faces to promote the invasion of White nations by hostile and dangerous outsiders. Facism is always racism, whether it’s the healthy, truthful facism that helps Whites by recognizing that non-White faces go with non-White brains, or the unhealthy, lying facism that harms Whites by pretending that non-White faces go with brains that are just like ours. No, they’re not like ours and they don’t fit in White societies. The faces of different races belong in different spaces.
“Another Jewish face, another Jewish fraudster: the anti-White, anti-Christian Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky”
Idiot. It’s your idol putin who is anti-Christian, blowing up Orthodox churches. Stop taking drugs.
Source: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00439-007-0460-x
I take issue with blue eyes and blonde hair being more attractive, luscious brunettes are easily as pretty, indeed countries like Italy, France and Spain are known for the beauty of their brunette specimens. Blonde hair was probably just a random mutation in a White population that spread around, if it’s beauty was especially captivating it would have spread more abundantly away from the North Sea-Baltic zone.
Actually Zelinsky closed all Christian orthodox churches but allowed all synagogues to remain open. This is the same thing the jewish bolsheviks did after they took over Russia in 1917.
Nicely and succinctly observed.
Zelensky is particularly ugly. He is:
1. Short
2. Pudgy
3. Sloppy
4. Bearded
AND he plays with himself on the piano keys. YUCK!
It is not as simple as Homo sapiens evolved in Africa and dispersed to the rest of the world. There is contention about the out-of-Africa theory.
http://thorpsci.weebly.com/uploads/1/7/0/0/17001640/origins_of_modern_humans.pdf
The leading proponent of the Multiregional Hypothesis, Prof Milford Wolpoff, does not recognise the existence of biological race; for instance, he writes:
Source: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/240611478_Paleoanthropology_and_Race
People, the world over, when they smile, they see white teeth, and think of white skinned people. When they sit on the toilet and look at their poop, and see it is various shades of brown, they think of black skinned people.
Nature decided that teeth would be white like white people, and poop to be brown like black people. Thus, racism is natural. Thank nature .
Regardless there is contention about the out-of-Africa theory.
I saw a film recording where he and some other turd were banging the keyboard with their dicks. Then the camera panned the audience (Ukrainian), and they were laughing!!
Well dressed women, the pillars of society, thought this was soooo funny.
Is it my imagination, or do Ukrainians look considerably stupid, or at least kind of goofy?
They radiate some kind of retardation vibe.
Liar.
Blonde hair in Europe comes from the Sami people (Lapps). In Scandinavia it is referred to – with some contempt – as the ‘communal colour’ and dark hair is seen as superior. The Slavs were a tribe from Scandinavia which is why blonde hair is common in Russia and its borderland aka Ukraine. It is the Americans who have made a fetish of blondes: maybe because of the slave population ?
You can dress anyone up….but obviously only the lowest IQs would pay good money to attend a Zelensky vaudeville performance….
The black criminal faces you show above are on average 65% white and 33% black as for the genetic composition. It can be said that the wrong genes are white essentially but that the presence of black genes removes a kind of natural inhibition against all instincts (healthy and criminal) the black races prefer to get along without so as to remain child-like irresponsible at adult age. It seems that the culprit is not so much blackness as miscegenation and I for one have remarked that pure sculptural feline jet-hued blacks are even rarer in prisons and on rap scenes as pure Whites. If the leftists adored the Blacks so much they would not push for so much miscegenation. It turns out that wherever the want Black immigration in any neighbourhood they are primordially interested in giving them the White people’s daughters.
Not intelligent contention.
https://eurweb.com/2021/nigerian-woman-gave-birth-to-white-baby/
Believe me, the daughters are known to graciously accept, fairly often.
Good article. Points out the beauty of European faces compared to the grift from further south,
One aspect of the exaltation of blacks that the author of this post has not explored is the externalized altruism that is a part of White womens’ psyche.
This nurturing altruism is necessary in the formation of families as long as it is internalized toward the family and not externalized. Massive, irreversible problems do arise when this altruism is externalized.
A good example of this is when a black man approaches a White woman and after attempting to ask for a date states: “You won’t date me because I’m black”. This black predator often successfully plants a “guilt trip” on the White woman who succumbs to the “charms” (uggh!) of the black man, quite often with disastrous results–externalized altruism at its worst.
The proper response for a White woman must be: “That’s right, I don’t date outside my race”.
White women must be given the “talk” by both mothers and fathers. It must be emphasized that no matter how “nice” the black person seems, they are “different” and incompatible with White societal norms, there being always the probability that impregnation and abandonment will occur, the black man only showing up to get the welfare check from the white woman. You see, conquest and domination of whites is a black dream that does get realized with the domination that White women succumb to when giving in to blacks. It’s just not worth it.
This “talk” must be reinforced from time-to-time and in later years toward adulthood, the possibility of family estrangement and abandonment if racial norms are not honored must be discussed.
As White women achieve adulthood, many of them will see that racial awareness is for the best.
Regards,
Murica and the NATO-€URoZone are being overridden by OpenBorder Advocates, Labor/Drug/Child/Sex/Gun Traffickers, and Migranvaders.
The Masonic-Zionist Plutarchy and their Vassal_Oligarchs have enabled and worsened the various Scenarios involving the Hegemony’s Core 8 Nation-States (ISR+Diaspora and the Vassal_G7).
In short, the Situations mirror a merger of conditions depicted in Konbluth’s “Marching Morons” and Raspail’s “Camp of the Saints”.
Emigrate or Secede.
It is abundantly clear from that quote that “professor” Milford Wolpoff is motivated not by scientific but by political considerations in denying the biological reality of race: if we recognize the reality of race then that might lead to inequality and oppression, therefore we must deny it.
His mother’s name is Ruth Silver. He is probably Jewish and a Marxist to boot.
Let me guess; he’s trying to ‘inflate’ their significance.
Out of that entire article that’s what you took out of it Abe?
They’re almost right, because Afua Hirsch actually looks (very rarely) more like an ugly white woman than the ubiquitous baboon.
What planet have you been on? Russia has built 16,000 new churches and over 1,000 monastaries since the end of the USSR & there are now over 37,000 Russian Orthodox churches worldwide.
You forget the most beautiful of them all, the german brunette ( preferably with blue eyes )
Langdon seems to forget that most human beings’ faces on this planet are esthetically mediocre,if not downward ugly ,and the race doesn’t change anything about this sad truth
Some ethnies seem to do better than others though, like the Koreans in Asia, the East Africans in Africa , the Dutch, Danes, Italian and south Germans in Europe , the Iranians in the middle east , for example .
Like all ideologues , Langdon is eager to find relations that support his theory, but a beautiful face has never made a beautiful soul, unfortunately or not .
The Antifa mugshots undermine the rest of the points made in this article.
The seamless crossover between Antifa and White Nationalism (both left-wing ideologies) also reveals the similarity between those two groups (at least among the males of those groups).
The White genes in these troglodytes are generally drawn from the shallow end of the White gene pool. Note the pictures of Antifa above.
I’m Norwegian and I’ve never heard anyone in Scandinavia (except sick leftists) refer to blonde hair with contempt. Scandinavian men like their blonde women as much as any other white men. Maybe you have contempt for blondes because in your bathhouse, arab men have hairier holes than blonde men do and that’s your thing.
I do think that mulattoes are uglier and more violent than pure Blacks. You see this in countries such as Brazil, they are the most violent, and pretty ugly too (the mix with a third indigenous race helps even less).
The main problem of Blacks is miscegenation. We should devise a way to make genetic changes so that Blacks and Whites cannot reproduce together, or that their offspring become sterile, like the monstrous offspring of tigers with lions (ligers).
Women have no agency. They follow what they see on Netflix.
Why can’t Blacks just marry other Blacks? Do they think white people are more beautiful?
Don’t they think that “Black is Beautiful?” Is there not a contradiction here? Why are Blacks always wondering “where the white women at”?
Stop race-mixing. Race-mixed people are usually ugly (save a few exceptions).
I like blond hair, and I see its attraction, but many naturally blond women have rather plain faces. While brunettes can have strikingly beautiful faces, especially the Mediterranean type (French/Italian). However, blond hair and blue eyes are recessive, and that’s why it spread less I suppose.
The 3rd world economic immigrant invasion of the West is a fait accompli. The critical dilemma now is if there are certain groups that disenfranchised whites can unite with in order to effect a counter revolution/takeover.
Is there a category of “good” that cuts across all ethnic groups that disenfranchises whites can join forces with: Can we go to the barricades together with good Jews, good Blacks, good Moslems and good Queers?
If we cannot trust “good” ethnic sub-groups, then are there any ethnic groups that we could form alliances with: Koreans? Japanese? Spanish Latinos?
Ultimately it will come down to secession, at some level, and there will be confederations of secessionists. Could you enter into a secessionist Confederation with a like minded neighborhood or even county grouping of Koreans? Blacks? even Jews?
I take issue with the author’s view of evolution as some kind of God, because according to the Darwinists’ own principles, so-called “evolution” is quite blind (and it shouldn’t even be called “evolution”, which presupposes improvement or progress). It doesn’t care about beauty or intelligence. In fact, right now European peoples are “evolving” by mixing with Blacks, Asians and Arabs, and if they become low-IQ mulattoes, what does evolution care about that? Perhaps low-IQ mulattoes are those most “adapted” to the current environment, and thus, the most “fit to survive”?
That said, I don’t really believe in the Darwinist evolution theory, I don’t think new species come about through “random mutations”, or that lizards are fish that learned to walk. I think things are more complex than that.
That said, when I look at my piano keys and how narrow they are, either Mother Nature has been especially niggardly with Zelensky or she has endowed him with a thingy as forked as his tongue b/c there is no way a normal guy can play it with his johnson.
I’d say that they’re massively degraded compared with Soviet times because of the parasitic external and internal influence. This didn’t happen as much in Russia, probably because of the influence of the old Soviet apparatus (‘Deep State’?) although the nation at times hung by a thread. You can see it in the people on the street. They have DIGNITY and a living culture. Long may Mother Russia live!
In the war, old Australian Communists I knew called it Fortress Russia. My Grandmother was a part of the ‘Sheepskins for Russia’ popular movement led by the Communist Party in particular, Jessie Street, which was then very influential in the wake of Stalingrad, Moscow, Leningrad, Kursk and so on. I grew up with the pride of being part of a nation with 100 million sheep, the biggest and best fine wool Merino flock in the world. My wife as a small girl and from a background with some parallels to mine, used to await the pleasure of reading the latest offerings from the Russian Young Pioneers presented to her by her wharf worker uncle; the Communist Party leading that workforce. That party had none of the cultural subversions we see today in the modern Left. In fact, as is well documented, they proudly projected their patriotism and punished those who sought to instil the divisiveness of “Bourgeois Feminism”, sexual permissiveness and so on. The rot set in, starting in the late 60’s from the USA and Britain.
Top 1, 4, bottom 2, 5 are 100% black faces. Top 2 is North African Arab. Top 3 and 5 are Algerian Arab / black mix type, bottom 1 and 4 are Moroccan Arab / black mix type. Only bottom 3 is predominantly white. How do I know? I’ve grown up in a Paris suburb. So where did you get your 65 / 33?
Exellent article. I agree, whether I have permission to or not.
Probably not. It would more likely score points with Zelensky’s Tribal Oligarch sponsors. A “must attend”…and laugh heartily…time after time…
A normal being’s idea of Hell.
Just to add one remark. Only the Trinity of Beauty, Goodness and Truth is eternal because only they can exist out of Time. Everything else is temporary and bound to rot.
The problem with white women is the fine fuzz hair they have on their skin.
They would be so much more feminine if they were truly smooth like black or asian women.
Shit, a pedigree worse than Death!
OTOH, what do you know about Marx. Not the very Jewish influenced “Russian Revolution”, but MARX…and his system.
Marx being of Jewish background can hardly be decisive in the assessment of his system – not the deeply bastardised one from the shit that has come to the surface of the deeply (((subverted))) US of A – but Marx as he wrote, propagandised and agitated, TAKEN AS A WHOLE. If we degenerate to that level – of equating biology with scholarly merit – then we are, in method, as bad as the worst subversive representatives of International Jewry, agent of ascendant Finance Capital.
My observation is that the “Marxists” of today have no idea of Marx. I suspect that the same applies to you and 99% of the “Far Right”, really the modern heirs to Marx.
Much as I dislike the political activism of Jewish-African hybrid Afua Hirsch, I don’t find her facial features particularly ugly. I think she looks somewhat like Egyptian pharao Echnaton:
The author has over-egged the pudding. And stated as true some non-true claims all a-mixed with valid true observation and facts. The article needs an editorial dialectic process to change it from a poor paper to a fine one.
Our tastes in face are primarily those imprinted as infants…and the tastes in faces – the preferences of women, tend to conserve some qualities and dispense with qualities mothers dislike. They chose mates they like, and nurture better the babies they like. Men favor the faces of the lady that they imprinted on, of course sometimes males nurture infants too – which may reduce a male child’s potential for successful reproduction, or incline a female child to sexual extreem – the Maxwell slut being an example, they say. aheeemm.
Meantime> De gustibus non est disputandum. (There’s no accounting for tastes)
Best!
Therese Johaug

@Tobias Langdon
Do not use words like “racism” or “racist” as they are anti-White slurs (and more and more anti-Asian too ; now it is their turn.).
Like many other words ending with -ist or -ism, its definition varies from one person to another.
The problem is that it is those who use these words who decide on their meaning. THEY have the right to decide who is a “racist”. THEY have the right to decide what “racism” means.
By using them, you place yourself on the enemy’s ground :
Any debate is lost in advance. It is not new : read https://penetrate.blogspot.com/2010/01/racist-word-invented-by-ussrs-leon.html?m=1
The unfortunate girl will be salvaged for juju parts before she can pass on her genes.
By Asian, you only mean only East Asian women. Have you slept with Arab/Middle Eastern or Indian/ South Asian women? hairy hairy hairy, hairy as f##k. Way more hairy than White women. Never could figure out why those dark skinned Caucasoids living in such hot climates needed so much hair for, more hair than cold climate evolved European White Caucasoids. Black Africans don’t have much body hair, which makes sense as they evolved for the tropical heat. On the other hand cold climate evolved North East Asians, native Siberians, Eskimos, Greenlanders etc..don’t have much body hair. Weird.
Well I use the term “Marxist” in an extended sense, not restricted to the social-economic ideology of Karl Marx, but incuding its modern transformations Cultural Marxism and what I call “Racial Marxism”.
All three forms of Marxism presuppose a struggle between the “oppressed” and “opressors”. In original Marxism that is the struggle between the “proletariat” and the “bourgeoisie”, in Cultural Marxism between women and men, homos and heteros, minorities and the majority, and in Racial Marxism between non-Whites and Whites.
I would call Milford Wolpoff a “Racial Marxist”. If he is indeed Jewish, he is probably also motivated by Jewish paranoia, fearing that racism in science could lead to “another Holocaust”.
The “fine fuzz hair they have on their skin” on their necks at the edge of their hairline and around their ears is one of the most arresting places on a blonde woman’s body. A fragrant garden.
@Tobias Langdon
Do not use words like “racism” or “racist” as they are anti-White slurs.
Like many other words ending with -ist or -ism, it means “supporter of”. But the existence of races is not a partisan issue. Races do exist, even if some people or organizations with ill-intentioned goals pretend to deny them.
So don’t call yourself a “racist”.
He’s responsible for a wave of church rebuilds. After the USSR demolished so many.
Brown haired white women are universally regarded as more attractive than blonde haired white women, but black haired, brown eyed Asian women beat them all out of the water.
True, but maybe the talk should be expanded. Psychologists who specialize in marital counseling have a saying, a lament (cynical and overstated to be sure, but it exists and it has a literature): “Everyone marries the wrong person.”
Lying about Russia is part of the salary.
Blue eyes are magnetic.
Blond hair isn’t by itself a natural trait as it can be bleached. But a tall blond like Rosamund Pike or Giselle Bundchen is a striking attractive thing all of itself.
@Tobias Langdon
“Fascism” was the political regime in Italy from 1922 to 1943.
“Fascist” was a member of the facist party or a sympathizer.
It has nothing to do with face.
The term “fascism” is derived from the Latin word “fasces”. The fasces, which consisted of a bundle of rods that were tied around an axe, was an ancient Roman symbol of the authority of the civic magistrate. Use it only when talking about the political regime in Italy from 1922 to 1943.
Marx’s dialectical materialism is to Hegel’s dialectical idealism what applied mathematics is to mathematics with one little difference, applied mathematics work. Hegel’s dialectics is nihilistic crap, Marx’s dialectics is applied nihilistic crap. Which is befitting a guy who wrote odes to the devil.
Marx’s defence by his ideological offspring always reminds me of a BBC documentary about the rise of fascism in Italy that I saw some 30+ years ago. It said that Italians loved Mussolini like they loved Caruso, they loved the music and didn’t pay much attention to the lyrics.
Except that Marx’s followers are wholly making up the music.
If you believe population data, Jews are about 1 in 500 throughout the world. So how come…..
If my morning poop wore a wig, it would look like a black bipedal.
Carlton Coons, a very interesting anthropologist now sadly forgotten, pointed out that eye color has a different distribution in Europe than blondness: Slavs are the blondest, but Britain (used to) have the highest percentage of blue eyes. Therefore, Slavs are more likely to be brown-eyed blonds, and ethnic Western Europeans more likely to be blue-eyed brunettes. Dark hair on a European face acts as a frame and draws attention to the face, whether pretty or not, while silky bright blond hair draws the eye by itself. So a plainer woman with blond hair will get lots of attention, but the beauty of a blue-eyed brunette with a truly beautiful face cannot be faked. Not saying blonds can’t be truly beautiful, too, but usually the hair draws the eye away from other flaws, and that’s why it’s faked so often. Test: is the woman still pretty with darker hair?
The Venus de Milo is not a pretty woman; there are videos on YouTube showing “her” as a color reconstruction. If colored in as a brunette, she is quite homely and looks like a guy, and her torso is way too thick, not fat, but masculine, with her perky teenage breasts tacked on top:
Michelangelo used male models for his “women” and they looked the same way, except he put the breasts on upside down. His women are truly monstrous. This is why gay men shouldn’t be artists.
One thing about Blackie is they usually have good, strong, straight teeth. Maybe it is the dark skin that makes their teeth seem whiter? Sure there are some Blacks with bad teeth but on average Blacks have the whitest, straightest, strongest looking teeth out there.
Not all Whites are attractive for sure but on average they are the most physically attractive race as for facial features. However, Whites seem to age faster than Orientals and Blacks. Look at Africans. Depending on their region their physiques differ greatly. West African males tend to be more thickly built, East Africans tall and thin, shorter nigras from South Africa, etc. Northern Nordic Europeans tend to be tall, while Italians and Greeks are shorter on average.
Australian Aborigines, Jews, Arabs, Pakis, East Indians, Turks,South American and North American Indians, Samoans, Blacks all rank pretty low on attractive faces, but there are exceptions of course. Maybe a few others as well. Ugliest Whites on average? Probably the English. hahaha.
The whole SBF fraud thing is hilarious. Everyone was so surprised when a Jew was caught stealing the billions of dollars entrusted to him by fools. Who could’ve predicted it??
Agreed, and the only thing I’d add is that much or most of Jewish “entertainment” qualifies, certainly by our parents’ and grandparents’ standards.
Mass-media entertainment is now largely smut and torture porn, and always, always with a distinct anti-white and anti-male slant.
Well, I use the vernacular of the audience I am conversing with.
LOL, I envy your wide experience!
Unfortunately my tastes are rather vanilla, ….no, that is not right. …… lychee would be more fitting, LOL.
What percentage of White adults are blond, really? I’m guessing it’s pretty low. Unless you count light brown hair as blond.
I’m Northern Italian and Belgian. I was tow-haired as a lad, and my hair was closer to blond than brown into my college years–especially after my landscaping jobs in the summer. As I grew into full-fledged adulthood, though, my haired turned darker and darker brown. Now it’s mostly gray.
I’m not sure I’m partial to blonde women. There are lots of striking blondes out there, sure, but the same goes for White brunettes and redheads.
Redheads have long intrigued me. In percentage terms, I find fewer of them attractive than their blonde or brunette counterparts. But pretty redheads are never just pretty–they’re drop-dead beautiful.
Also, redheads seem disproportionately to fill the ranks of the “stacked.” I don’t know what genetics has to say about the correlation between red hair and bitchin’ bods. Somebody should look into it.
No shit.
Now that IS ‘informed’.
Also dirty blondes
Barbara Sukowa
Hanna Schygulla
Stating that white women are the most beautiful of women is invalid when compared to other races, because what is “beautiful” in darkest Africa is not what is considered beautiful in Europe, or shouldn’t be. In an ideal world black women should be the most attractive to black men, Indian women should be the most attractive to Indian men, Chinese women should be the most attractive to Chinese men and so on. It’s only through the constant exposure to western culture that other races consider white people to be attractive, in colonial times, this was not the case. Comparing the looks of a white woman to a black woman and saying that the white woman is more beautiful is a very subjective statement. It’s like making the statement that German Shepherds are more attractive animals than Siamese cats, the German Shepherd fanciers would agree with you but the Siamese cat fanciers would disagree. White women should be viewed through a “white” lens and black women should be viewed through a “black” lens, no comparison should be made. The left are so desperate to push their black racial superiority obsession, they have blacks in every TV commercial, they’re too dumb to realize that most whites just tune out. After 50 years of leftist black superiority garbage on television, most whites still marry whites and most of their relationships are with whites, only the most marginalized and low IQ whites marry negroes. You’d think that the “high IQ” jews and leftists that push all this garbage would see that their money and efforts behind the propaganda isn’t having much effect and stop, but these are not sane people, they are extreme personality types and are incapable of stopping.
Almost every action movie has an explicit torture scene now, and even comedies often have a “for-laffs” torture scene. You might think this is recent, but even old movies often featured torture if it was a war or crime picture.
I truly wish this were not accurate, but alas, wishing does not make it so.
One can be sure that the following will be cured by the Jewish elite…
“Only racism and sexism can explain why Black women have never won Nobel Prizes for Physics or Field Medals in mathematics.”
It’s only matter of time!
Bathhouse frequenter or not, this Greek knows bugger all about Blondes.
The ‘only’ ‘Blondes’ in modern Greece are of the peroxided variety – and there are plenty of those, as there are among the Jews. The reason is obvious.
There’s truth in what you say – each race has it’s own particular beauty. A photo of young African tribespeople clearly shows their white, strong teeth and shiny dark skin to advantage, along with the straight, proud posture that goes along with an intact cultural inheritance. But European (and to a certain extent northern Asian) women had to compete for male attention while their bodies were covered in furs, so developed bright, flowerlike faces to attract attention. The European type has greater variety in coloring and greater extremes of beauty, but some might argue that there are hardly any truly homely young northern Asian women, even if they all look somewhat alike. I was at a gathering recently that included a bunch of Japanese exchange students, and you couldn’t have told them apart from from behind – each one had the same petite but shapely frame. One was a beauty, but every girl was cute as a button.
Yep, from one who has read both Hegel and Marx, that is informed. And that is why I consider that Marxists are either truly evil or truly cretinous. Metric entropy is the mathematical way to describe how Marxism evolves and it always ends with society imploding. That said, Marxist ideologues have proven time and again that they were clueless about how nature works.
If the author did either a composite picture or a collage picture of all the male unz readers the impression give off probably would NOT look appealing or even friendly or particularly intelligent. Same for all the Unz women readers.
Its ONLY upon talking and interacting with other unz readers would we be able to “see ourselves” as “The Unz Clan” or “Clan of the Unz”. Moreover we would have a particular emotional disposition and this could or could not be “group binding” over the long term.
Damn, no wonder the white traitor trash of (((BLM/Antifa))) hate normal Whites.
True, of both sexes too. Eight or nine out of ten redheads are homely or downright ugly. One out of ten is stunning, captivating.
Interesting comment. We miss the old Western Left, they were worthy opponents and enemies. Today they are useful idiots that hug trees, promote sexual degeneracy and love for criminals, saving the poor of 3rd world countries allowing them to replace the Western working class, and undermine meritocracy by promoting gender and racial equality.
I say it’s more than just faces, it’s the spirits behind the faces.
Demon-possessed people don’t look so good. Just like homosexuality deforms the face and body, so do demons.
http://biblicisminstitute.wordpress.com/2015/10/27/where-is-satan-now/
Darwin’s hypothesis suggests that individuals of different ethnic groups would seek mates from a different ethnic group. In so doing, fit genes from the 2 could come together in an off-spring of theirs to give rise to a better individual. A gene that causes individuals to seek unrelated ethnic mates is therefore selected for.
Unfit genes from the 2 could come together too but that off-spring would be quickly weeded out of the population and therefore does not count.
Check this for Indo-European beauty:
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/netAsL7L1YI
An easy 10, right.
In the Divine liturgy, composed by Saint James the Less, there is a prayer that includes this –
People of every race…
RACE EXISTS AND ONLY DUPED WHITES THINK IT IS A SOCIAL CONSTRUCT
The article certainly has internal coherence, the writer exercises fine self-control… the mountain thing is a bit weird and out of nowhere.
You’ve got mountainous Swiss, mountainous Austrians, mountainous South Slavs, mountainous White Americans, mountainous Japs, Han, Tibetans, Norwegians, Russians, Hungarians, Spaniards, Frenchmen, Scotts, Icelanders, Corsicans, and much of the Asiatic Indo-Aryans.
Strange anti-mountain aversion.

troof! i guess you already renigga’d on your new years resolutions to shed the inferiority and dishonesty complexes you cling to!
have a ‘port and a chicken sannich and stfu!
Ann-Margret. Now that was a smoking hawt redhead.
Her parents passed on her genes.
Hey, let’s start with a softball, such as, “why can’t Unzistas lust over racist white girls, instead of pie faces?”
And we’ll progress from there.
I’ve played timpani at a couple of Philharmonics with mine, but then, I do have an 85-IQ.
[Stop bolding your comments or they will all be trashed.]
That is a very interesting question, which hasn’t occurred to me before. One possibility may be the need to retain higher levels of sexual body odours to overcome the smell of sweat, perhaps. I’m not a scientist and it is just an ignorant layman’s suggestion.
The idea of what constitutes a “blonde” has changed greatly in the last 100 years. Here is Bouguereau’s “Study of a blonde” – Most of his models were northern Italian peasant girls.
Why do you think that anyone will believe a word you say, paid shill? Why is this spam account allowed to continue posting? It’s just proven lies. We’re better than allowing it. Ban it and wipe the posts.
The original author of OOA has admitted it’s not legitimate, thanks to new evidence he has seen.
LOL, are you sure that wasn’t your new years resolution?
I don’t know about Mulattos, but it is definitely the case with “zambos” in South America (black+indian native), they have a very bad reputation worse than the “parent” populations.
Agreed, now where do I sign up?
In my lifetime, the US has had one handsome president, JFK. What happened to him? He got replaced by the Golda Meir look alike, LBJ.
One of the illustrations to this article, the ANTIFAS, is all whites and all UGLY. So much for the author’s contention that whites have a monopoly on beauty.
Isn’t Gerald Kaufman the horny-handed son of the soil who used the excuse of OCD to explain away why he purchased luxury glassware chandeliers on his travel budget?
I’m Syrian/ Celtic -French and have no body hair on my arms and legs. I do have thick perfectly curved eyebrows a la Lauren Becall. And blue eyes from my Christian Syrian father, and brown hair from my French mother. Tan easily.
I never found him good looking. He always looked weird to me, even as a child when all were saying how good looking he was. Can’t explain it; a too large head maybe?
Beauty has to do with affluence. The stress of life will do things to your appearance. Whites without affluence, beauty products and healthy lifestyle look as grungy as anyone. I remember making fun of how ugly Koreans were back when the country was very poor. Look at them now. Chinese in China look like sh$t throughout the “century of humiliation”. The cosmopolitans in Shanghai look really good. Native Southeast Asians with money look really good.
Then again, some areas have people blessed with good genetics and beautiful symmetry. Parts of China, Japan, Thailand, parts of Europe, parts of Southeast Asia (but not Philippines)…heck, part of the rest of the world.
High IQ usually breeds success which in turn resulted in hypergamy which in turn collected all the good genes. Generally, good looking people are usually smarter and more successful. Good looking people also get free passes for many things, better employment opportunities and get treated much better. That’s why ugly people are bitter and angry.
Oh yeah… Lebanese are very good looking. Good genes.
Common sense for once. Thanks
“Rape” is a social construct. So is “murder”.
So is “face”.
So is “law” (and related terms – “legal”, “constitutional” and so forth).
So is “nation”; so is “border”; so is “property”. And on and on it goes. “Tolerance”; “religion”; “telephone”; “rights”.
When halfwits from the Grievance Industry assert that race and/or gender are ‘social constructs’, they should immediately be confronted with the fact that literally everything that protects them from being killed where they stand, is likewise a ‘social construct’.
People who fall for the misdirection – who try to argue against the proposition that race (or gender) is a social construct – are falling for the oldest trick in the high-V book: manoeuvring the argument to pointless nit-picking over a statement that has no epistemic content wirth considering.
Every taxonomy is a social construct, because the very notion of descriptors doesn’t exist ‘in nature’. It doesn’t mean that the taxonomy is meaningless or that the gradations within the taxonomy are false.
It’s another case of the Third Proverb for Paranoids:
Have not seen such specimen during my 30 yr. stint in Berlin. Where could one find these mythical being.
The Germans are often called by Czechs “skopčáci”, literally “people from the hills”. Does it explain their murderous nature?
It would be hard to find any kind of German in Berlin these days!
Looking at these averaged faces, my impresion is that there is not much difference from one to another. If the aim of the study was to show exactly that, then it is ok, otherwise it a trivial exercise.
People tend to look ugly in mug shots. Even Hollywood stars.
That looks to be a fake blonde. New hair growing out is black, and her eyebrows are darker than the dyed hair. There’s a hell of a lot of fake blondes around.
Not true. He only closed the ones belonging to the Russian patriarchate,, for obvious reasons.
Well, I’d have to say that, Black/Jewish or not, Afua Hirsch is infinitely more attractive than that humdrum Aphrodite.
You sound like a man I know, as long as they have black hair and almond eyes he’s into them. His life story has been going from one Asian woman to another, he’s 63 years old with no letting up. He’ll probably die in Thailand in the arms of a 20 year old ladyboy.
Laugh . . . well there’s a new twist . . .
invade Ukraine because they look funny and that funny must be because they aren’t intelligent . . .
good grief.
White people sure seem to have lots of color variations in hair and eyes that they are born with.
People of color (unless racially mixed) don’t seem to have anything other than black hair and brown eyes…..
Maybe they ought to start calling Whites people of color?
While the current people of color are just…………well…… mostly dark.
How about “cute” or “beautiful?”
Video Link
Historically everybody has a murderous nature, from the biggest steppe nomad tribes to the tiniest Maori clan. With the possible exception of the world’s punching bags the Irish and the Slavs.
The Slavs had to learn the hard way how to go into monster mode, while the Irish simply endured, then got patted on the head and accepted into the club of “real whites”, and a generation later were automatically slated for globohomo replacement and castration as “proper evil whites”.
Drivers license photos are even worse.
Quite likely, those well dressed, seemingly well-to-do Ukrainians you are mentioning were actually Ukrainian Khazars.
“Everyone marries the wrong person” and some of us do it again and again.
I hope my wife never reads this but I am not really worried since she avoids
people who are angry,egotistical,opinionated,insulting and argumentative.
So I know you’re wondering why she got involved with me.
That is the mystery of attraction.
Hey asshole, why don’t you expound upon this neoclassical face:

Well, there are a lot if fellows like that, and who can blame them? I’m not a man, I’m an old lady, but if my son married an Asian girl, I could live with it. They seem mostly to be very sweet feminine girls. My nephew is married to a Chinese girl and they seem happy. It’s odd that a Communist Chinese girl is more traditional than an American girl.
I never found him good looking. He always looked weird to me, even as a child when all were saying how good looking he was. Can’t explain it; a too large head maybe?
His eyes look wrong somehow, possibly connected with his Addison’s disease. He never appealed to me either.
Agreed. I think Richard Nixon was more attractive than JFK. Also I don’t think Jacqueline was beautiful. And Sinatra was ugly as fuck:
Video Link
But the great flaw in this article is that women will marry ugly men who are intelligent or rich. In fact classic Jewish breeding practices will bring together a homely but brilliant Talmudic scholar with a very attractive rich man’s daughter.
The Nazis are the biggest contradiction to this article. They elevated the Teutonic Aryan myth while the party leaders were four extremely ugly homely men who contradicted every Aryan stereotype promoted by the party.
Joseph Goebbels was particularly ugly but he was married to a German woman of great beauty who looked like Marilyn Monroe:

This article at the end of the day is bullshit because it doesn’t want to recognize that beautiful women don’t necessarily end up coupling with attractive men. That’s because women are more attracted to money power and brains than to physical appearance.
When you cross a wolf with a dog you often get the worst of both species: the aggression of a wolf with the lack of timidity of a dog. I saw a TV show that said that the worst cases of wolves attacking humans involve these crossbreeds that are half wolf and half dog.
Also the blacks historically who are the biggest agitators for change like Frederick Douglass or Malcolm X seem to be mixed breeds, probably thanks to ancestral rapes by white slave owners. I’m certain Farrakhan is mixed race as well. He does not have classic negroid features at all. And of course the same with President Yomama.
The “Out of Africa” theory may apply to Black Africans and but not to light skinned “Out of Russia” Denisovans. Two very distinct species they keep trying to unite as the same species.
Denisovans were possibly the offspring of Ancient Astronaut Gods, the Anunnaki. It is written that, Mankind was created by the Anunnaki Ancient Astronaut Gods around 400 000 years ago by fusing the DNA of Homo Habilis with Anunnaki DNA to create the first Adama Prototype.
All this “follow the science” bs is preventing humanity from finding out our true origins, that we did not climb down from trees as monkeys and evolve into our current form.
They want us to be caged within their Zionist biblical hypothesis where they control creation origins, and those that don’t follow the narrative are frauds, heretics, Nazi’s, godless bla bla bla.
CQ is a blond haired, blue eyed entity, I did not come “Out of Africa”.
Facist,fascist,fasces.
Nobody gives a feces.
Alliterate yourself.
Ginger High Yellows (Coleman Young, Reverend Wright are classic examples) are the most violently anti-white. Their “cousins” so-called “Jersey Whites” tended to be anti-white, too, but on a more snooty polished level.
“Passing” an early-to-mid 20th century endeavor, those light colored people’s attempt at assimilation into white Northern US was a flop. By mid 20th century that bunch had an axe to grind.
True, but note that a nontrivial number of famous white men married black women much less famous than them (it would be different if they married a black woman who is a celebrity of equal stature) :
George Lucas
Roger Ebert
Robert De Niro
David Bowie
Wolfgang Puck
Dirk Nowitzki
Bill Burr
Bret Hart
Cody Rhodes
Sure, you could say some are East African women with different facial features, some are much younger second wives, De Niro is a simp, etc. But there are famous white men who married black women much less famous than them. And they are all black, not quatroons.
Sounds like you are from the Planet Ganja.
Check out China–Rising—USA collapsing—capitalism now has evolved into cronyism.
This photo of a stunning Finnish brunette comes from a book on sexism in the airline stewardess industry:
https://www.themuse.com/advice/stewardesses-fought-sexism-at-work-1970s-nell-mcshane-wulfhart
Despite all that, I think blonde Magda Goebbels is gorgeous.
The US is way more Marxist than China nowadays.
Anyone wondering about the weird nexus between Zionism and Nazism should consider the story of Magda Goebbels. Arguably the most beautiful woman in Germany, Magda was raised by a Jewish stepfather and was a very close friend and possible lover of leading early Zionist Haim Arlozoroff:
https://www.anumuseum.org.il/blog-items/the-goebbels-connection-romantic-mystery-behind-the-arlosoroff-assassination/
Now look at this photo of the Jew and certainly it evidences almost every anti-Jewish stereotype the Nazis could muster. And yet even so Magda Goebbels, future wife of Joseph, second to Hitler in the Nazi leadership, considered converting to Judaism and moving to Palestine to marry this man!


I need to modify my earlier comment. I think Magda Goebbels is FAR more beautiful than Marilyn Monroe because she was intelligent and dignified and not a low-class Hollywood slut.
It’s interesting that you realize some women are also attracted to intelligence, not just money and status.
I come from Nordic asf Minnesota, natural blonde hair is much more common among males*(ranging from Sandy light brown to bright yellow). As are blue eyes. So far as I can tell, moderately brown hair is the default (natural shade) among women. Modern women so frequently (and obnoxiously) dye their hair. Eye color is usually a dead give-away; natural blondes typically have blue, gray, and light green/bluish green eyes (they also tend to have pale ruddy skin). And even in Scandinavian whites, women often don’t have blue or grey eyes . Darker green and brown eyes are much more common. Fake blonde hair is unattractive to me.
*Did blonde hair become more common among males as a way of increasing trust and cooperation between men in Europe? Blonde hair makes you look younger and less intimidating. So perhaps over time blonde guys had an advantage at gaining trust, became successful in the process and thus reproduced often enough to select for blonde hair.
I grew up on a college campus and many of my friends came from families with a Jewish professor father and a Christian mother. The women were often very attractive and were clearly drawn to their mates’ intelligence.
A less attractive man might be a more considerate mate because he knows he has to work harder to retain his wife’s affection. This would dovetail with his intelligence as well.
I like dark hair on a man. I think it makes a man look more distinguished and serious than blonds who often look childish and sometimes don’t age well. Dark haired men often seem more intelligent too.
A lot of times kids will start out blond but their hair darkens with age.
That’s an unflattering image of our esteemed host. But I understand your point. Mr. Unz is a great man. And beauty is (to a certain extent) in the eye of the beholder. Human virtue on the other hand can only be measured by conduct.
Those was some fertile fields he plowed.
Humph. Unlikely.
Not really. JFK, especially after mid 1950s started taking a shitload of drugs to manage his health. The drugs made his face bloated, which he loathed. He commented on it many a times, saying sometimes he didn’t even like looking in the mirror. The Kennedy you saw in his final years had a reason to look that bloated with bulldog eyes.Google him at 1950 or 1952 or at his wedding. Dude was dapper, tall and excellent with words. He’s probably the only world leader who resembled James Bond.
Obama,hate him if you like was good looking but thats coz he was still in his prime. People have to understand that all the government officials elected are older in age. In their youth they all looked good. Ronald Reagan was dasing, could have been a movie star, Jimmy Carter was also good looking in his 20s-30s.
Lucas’s wife Melony Dobson is actually quite well known in business circles, and whilst nowhere as wealthy as him, she is no ordinary black of the hood.
De Niro is a strangers case. He always dated black women. Some say this began after Taxi Driver when Cybill Shephard(gorgeous angel) rejected him. Since then he’s only dated black.
Bowies wife was very famous in the fashion and modeling line and to be fair….gorgeous. It’s weird but I often see a lot of Somalian women with stunning features
Homo sapiens did not evolve in Africa. That theory comes from an extremely biased study at university of California Berkeley home of vicious anti White racism for almost a century now.
When the lie Homo sapiens evolved in Africa is mentioned I stopped reading.
That may be true if the potential male mates are of equal socio-economic standing. Once a male from a different ethnic group is significantly more wealthy than his rivals, then that makes him ” soooooooo much more handsome”.
Have you traced where he go his blue eyes from?
Yeah, totally agree.
I was just watching an episode of Dianxi Xiaoge yesterday. I am always struck by how good she looks compared with her farming relatives, all leathery skinned and such. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9-N6L3vQ0e4&ab_channel=%E6%BB%87%E8%A5%BF%E5%B0%8F%E5%93%A5DianxiXiaoge
Video Link
Even where I am from, I find that the generation after me is so much taller and bigger. My nephews all towered over me before they were 16.
But of course I am still better looking! LOL.
You sometimes need a drug like LSD to reimagine humanity’s origins.
Try it sometime, you might have a creative moment.
As the saying goes if you look like your passport photo it means you´re due
for a vacation 😀
The mix White Man with Black “Woman” has a increased risk of birth complications and mother’s death. White babies have too large craniums to go through a black or for that matter asian birth cannal.
The other way around that problem obviously doesn’t happen.
It is just a extremely decadent waste of a fertile womb.
And yes, every single white birth reminds the Jew, who is made in god’s image and doesn’t need plastic face surgery.
LOL. He was a movie star. And you missed an “h” there.
Written where? By whom? How do they know for sure? Or is it just speculation? Or a sci-fi story? But I’d like to think that humans didn’t evolve from apes, although some do seem to be closer to apes, even own, than I’d wish.
I find Eurasians very attractive, especially those from central Asian republics: Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan.
White women were once good looking but from what I’ve seen lately they’re ugly, gross. Going around some public beaches I find most white women extremely fat and ugly. Occasionally, there may be the odd young good looking girl but even with those you can tell that they’ll soon put on weight and look like their mothers. I don’t remember that it was like that when I went to beaches in my youth. But obesity is catching on in most places, even in Eastern Europe and Southeast Asia.
But if they were not, that says something about Ukrainian culture and the general population. I have never heard of any popular blowback from the people when Zelensky, who platformed on peace, did the 180 degree opposite, dropped the charade and mask, and revealed himself as a ZIO conman parasitic Talmundic inhuman.
Not very smart people, evidently. They are being used as fodder. If I pretend that I am Ukrainian, it is manifestly obvious that my country would be better off under Russian govenment, as another member of the Federation.
I’m of the same opinion. I find Eurasian and Oriental women as having special qualities of inner and outer beauty and allure. They are different in positive ways from the mundane and banal woman of the West.
Check it out:
https://www.google.com/search?q=eurasian+russian+women&newwindow=1&sxsrf=ALiCzsY-i7KCdP3NEhAfp5QDb0kInCC-CQ:1672852528734&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj4mPKlta78AhWZQjABHfxqB3oQ0pQJegQIAxAC&biw=1429&bih=970&dpr=1
I’ve spent an amount of time on Eleni’s Russian Youtube channel, traveling Russia with her. She is Russian and Tatar. I have to say, Slavic women not only are beautiful, but seem to be substantial, grounded and sturdy. Check out the women of Belarus. Average intelligence is high.
https://www.youtube.com/@ElifromRussia
Yeah. Many of them are fake or part fake–highlights, you know. Blonde as kids, towheads even, their hair turns darker as they grow older. I wouldn’t say her roots are “black”. Eyebrows are often darker but not a perfect indicator of pubic hair color, which may be truly blonde. Still, all in all, a beautiful, athletic woman; multiple gold-medal winning Olympic cross country skier. Fortunately, even if she doesn’t live up to your standards, someone out there does. There’s a match for everyone.
“It’s odd that a Communist Chinese girl is more traditional than an American girl.”
It could be one of three things: 1) That the Chinese culture and the definition of the roles of man and women were just too strong for communist indoctrination to change. 2) The west, with it’s emphasis on individualism and “human rights”, and the 20th century’s hostility to traditions of any kind, was fertile ground for feminism to grow and produce it’s bitter fruit. 3) Feminism was only targeted at the west and not China and it was part of the plan to destroy the relationship between white men and women by making women angry, ugly and hostile while at the same time flooding the west with Asian women. The end result wouldn’t need a rocket scientist to predict.
Marilyn Monroe was quite ordinary looking before the blonde hair and Hollywood makeup.
https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fimages.fineartamerica.com%2Fimages%2Fartworkimages%2Fmediumlarge%2F1%2Fteenage-marilyn-monroe-1940-color-added-2016-david-lee-guss.jpg&f=1&nofb=1&ipt=27a29d51b50cecd211d9015a9c1055ca339efcc7e31b01fd4352f757abc40f43&ipo=images
Do not know. His father had blue eyes too. Considering they’re from one of the oldest continuously inhabited cities on earth, originally, who know? Could be from some invaders or occupiers or traders or colonizers, could be Romans, European crusaders, Viking adventurers, or could it possibly be indigenous to the region? One of my middle eastern cousins whose last name was “Baghdadi,”[ also Christian] also had blue eyes. We’re descended from the early first Christians, supposedly. [I recall my world traveling bartending and photographer cousin saying he liked getting back to Europe periodically “just to see white faces”[ none of us are swarthy dark].
She’s fine. Just commenting on her hair colour.
Yes she was such a beauty that Joseph dumped her for Lida Baarova till Hitler forbid him to see his lover. Magdas intelligence expressed itself in a remarkable fashion by poisoning her 6 chidren.
from BZ
Nur Stunden nach Hitlers Selbstmord löschte auch Propaganda-Minister Joseph Goebbels seine Familie aus. Magda Goebbels vergiftete ihre 6 Kinder. Zuerst ihren Sohn Helmut.“Als Helmut sich unter entsetzlichem Stöhnen krümmt, öffnet Frau Goebbels die Tür und flieht in den Korridor. In den Armen der Baronin von Varo schluchzt sie: ‚Ich kann es nicht tun! Ich kann es nicht tun! Geben Sie mir eine Zigarette.‘ Zwischen kurzen, dünnen Zügen wiederholt sie immer wieder: ‚Zwei sind schon tot, ich kann nicht mehr weiter!’“
Your point is well taken. I think Magda was very beautiful. The fact that her husband had an affair means nothing. I’ve read that he was a notorious skirt chaser like many Christian theologians who seem to have a double life and many sexual skeletons hidden in the closet.
I found this account of Goebbels’ last days in the bunker. You might not agree with her reasons to commit suicide and kill all of her children; however she clearly is intelligent eloquent and idealistic. Nobody ridicules the Jews on Masada who killed their children and committed mass suicide rather than fall into the hands of the Romans. So why should we ridicule Hitler and the Goebbels family for doing the same thing?
Maybe the claim that Joseph Goebbels was a skirt chaser is just malicious All-lies propaganda. I have no idea. I read that he was trained as a theologian. His full name was Paul Joseph Goebbels.
Now it’s quite interesting that his two proper names are both figures of great difficulty in Jewish history. Paul is reviled by most Jews for daring to take their religion to the Roman goyim who then accepted it and became the dominant cult. Today many theologians see Paul as an authentic Jew but a very canny marketer who knew how to tailor the Christ message to any audience. But traditionally Paul is one of the most hated figures among Jews because they think he created a daughter religion that then became much more powerful than the mother and abusive towards her.
Joseph is the problematical Old Testament figure who was arrogant and precocious and whom all of his brothers hated (apart from Benjamin his only full brother from the same mother Rachel). Joseph was sold into slavery in Egypt where he became the Viceroy and ended up saving his family from starvation during a famine. He was forgiving towards his siblings after they were reconciled. However Jewish teachings say that all suffering throughout Jewish history is Divine punishment or karmic retribution for the enmity the brothers had towards Joseph:
So I find it fascinating that the man who was probably the most eloquent Jew-hater in history carried both names Paul and Joseph!
Magda was clearly an idealistic woman. She was involved with the Zionist Arlozoroff who was considered the most eloquent spokesman for Zionism at that time. Later she became committed to Hitler and married Goebbels. She was obviously a person of great idealism and deep principles.
It’s really inappropriate to mention her in the same breath as Marilyn Monroe. Marilyn didn’t believe in anything and was just a tool for the Jews in Hollywood to exploit. She drank used drugs was promiscuous and had a horrible life. Magdalena Goebbels was a veritable Queen of Heaven compared to Marilyn Monroe. Maybe if Marilyn had been involved with the German filmmaker Leni Riefenstall, instead of the Jews in Hollywood, her life would have had dignity as well as glamor.
I’m sorry; but you’re on your own. If I had married a White/Asian/Wht+Asian Mixed Murican Dame, I’d probably find myself coordinating with Constitutional Convention / Secession Proposal Groups in the Northwest per my previous suggestions I posted on this Site.
Since I didn’t and have a “Overseas Family” Situation to manage – I’m going to take the ExPat/Emigration Route.
I’m a 2ndGen US Navy Vet from the Far East; and have a Elderly Widowed Mother (CoVID – Pneumonia. CoVID was taken care of in 5days with Monoclonals). She’s already outlived her Murican In-Laws and friends, so I’m taking her back home for her Final Years where she can be visited by her Relatives, Friends, and their Descendants.
I’ll probably ExPat around RCEP-Asia and/or SCO. I may need to commute on weekends to check up on “Ms. Daisey”; but people commute Coast to Coast here in Murica.
Best Regards.
How much was Joseph a skirt chaser is impossible to say but he was with Lida for about two years and she would have hardly tolerated his adventures. In any case, Lida must have been a greater fun to be with, than the nazi fanatic Magda. You may appreciate it from this video
Lida has not brought much luck to anybody. Her younger sister Zorka, who as an actor, was Lidas competitor for film roles, jumped from the balcony of their villa in 1946. According to people who knew her well, including my mother, Zorka was the more beautiful and talented of the two siters. Here is a picture of her.
https://cz.pinterest.com/pin/565131453237552620/
What a thoughtful comment.
I just want to say: don’t be distracted by the “communist” label.
The Chinese have been Confucian for 2000 years, and communist for only 70. It is no surprise which “layer” has a greater influence on the Chinese psyche/character.
No offense to your sensibilities regarding alluring females, but neither sister appeals to me. They in fact look rather Judisch don’t you think?
Magda was a goddess and principled, willing to die rather than to live a lie. No one today holds a candle to her.
Imagine her life had she escaped the bunker with the children. If they could arrest try and convict a former Auschwitz secretary at the age of 97 what would they have done to Magda?
She puts all of us to shame. She combined beauty brains and principles. A breathtaking offense in today’s totally satanic world.
If you took Latin Americans, Middle Easterners, East Asians, South Asians and Black Africans and asked them to rank the various races in order of beauty, they would put their own race first, but Whites would win out in the overall combined rankings. I wonder if that is because of media dominance or if whites are naturally better looking than other races.
I do not share you obsession with the murderous Magda, but everyone has a different taste.
I do not. Perhaps you see Jews behind every corner, or under your bed. There is no evidence of any Jewish ancestry of the Babka family. Strange that Hitler who was so enchanted with Lida has never noticed her supposed jewish features, but perhaps he was also a Jew as some jerks claim. What do you think?
Magda, the godess was also not entirely without a blemish because of her asociation with Haim Arlozoroff, who because of her typical jewish features would have been the right match for her, rather than the god-like figure Joseph.
Oh yeah haha he was indeed. I meant to write Reagan was a movie star and Gerald Ford who nobody would have thought of as a looker was an athletic stud muffin in college, could have been a movie star.
New phone stupid autocorrect and getting used to new keys
an astute observation.
IMHO it has to do with what is “aspirational”. Worldwide media is flushed with whites living in advanced, developed countries, living the good life. Consumers of such media is bound to absorb some of these aspirations subconciously.
And attitudes towards beauty/attractiveness change over time according to what is aspirational. For hundreds of years, being fair was considered attractive in Europe. This was because being tanned was associated with poor and having to work menially in the fields. Whereas fair means being rich enough to be spared manual labour.
But in the last half century this has morphed a little. Now having a good tan is associated with being rich enough to afford a vacation on a tropical beach on a faraway island.
As an amusement, we could try a thought experiment:
If worldwide trends continue, and imagine in 100 years in the future where East Asia is now much richer and influential than the West. Would smooth golden skin, long straight black hair and delicate features then become considered the ideal of beauty?
Now fast forward 300 years, and the West and East Asia are now poverty striken hell holes, but Africa is a rich flourishing continent. My guess is that the ideal beauty would then be a slender ebony body and bright white smile in a frizzy hairdo.
In what way? Is this what your studies in Marxism lead you to claim? Marx would be laughing from the grave.
If you mean more Culturally “Marxist”, then maybe. But that isn’t Marxism. Even the German KPD in the pre-National Socialist period rejected the Frankfurt School as anti-Marxist.
Takes composites of athletes from europe -> compares it to bunch of criminals mug shots.
Talks about the tragic murder of a girl -> proceed to post his headcannon on why it happened.
Pseudo-scientifical low effort shit posting at its finest.
Also, when several civilization such as the one in persia or baghdad had much more knowledgeable people than Europe, was the european brain less evoluted than the West Asian brain ?
Oh excuse my ignorance, it was of course the tyranny of christianity that removed the genius of old europeans pagans traditions.
This kind of article would be a good laugh on a fake news website if people wouldn’t take them that seriously.
There is more to “yellow fever” than is presently being discussed.
Quite often, white women are their own worst enemy when they stop acting like women. Their embrace of rabid feminism does absolutely nothing to make them attractive to white males, but quite the opposite. They are man-hating harridans who expect white men to be “wimps”.
Most Asian women KNOW how to treat a man. They know when to be deferential and when to push to achieve their own interests.
Of course, there are those who want only one thing–the coveted “green card” establishing permanent residency in the good ol’ USA, but Asian women do have an advantage by not embracing rabid man-hating feminism.
White women would do well to “step back” and take a good look at themselves.
This whole “women can do it all” mantra is demonstrably false and should be abandoned.
All one has to do is look at the evil of abortion. Murdering your own offspring for “convenience” is just downright evil.
Just maybe the biblical story in Genesis with the female temptress encouraging the male to partake of the “forbidden fruit” has merit.
Ahh, the tragic hapa.
Sitchin was born to a Jewish family in Baku, the capital of then Soviet Azerbaijan, and raised in Mandatory Palestine (which in 1948 became the modern state of Israel). He received a degree in economics from the University of London, and was an editor and journalist in Israel before moving to New York in 1952. While working as an executive for a shipping company, he taught himself Sumerian cuneiform and visited several archaeological sites.[3][4]
As least one basis of this text is factually false:
“Facism” is a corrupt spelling of fascism, and totally unrelated to “face”
Fascism comes from fasces, latin for bundle (of sticks), meaning the bundling = alignment of powers (executive, legislative, media, corporate, military) that need to be separated in a democracy but tend to be aligned in totalitarian states (such as China, USSR, North Korea, late Nazi Germany, Mussolini’s Italy, etc.)
Face comes from facies, latin for face, form, figure (not just face) whereas facial expression is latin vultus. The question whether French face came first, or derived from Latin facies is open for me.
Another commentor already mentioned some of this.
I feel certain that old English will have its own original (Celtic or Nordic) word for face, but indeed newer English is pretty much soaked in Latin and French, more so than German. Since German has imported so many English-Latin words since WW2, that is gradually changing.
German Gesicht is literally “that which sees and is seen” more like vision, but with many secondary meanings. The actual better German match for face would be Antlitz, which is old use for engl. countenance and French visage. Gesicht is what sees and what you perceive, Antlitz is what you look at.
Chinese Marxist researchers always find a fact in the study of Frankfurt School that the sponsors of Frankfurt School are often the Rockefeller Foundation and the Ford Foundation.
The essence of Frankfurt school is a kind of rhetoric used by the rich to deceive the poor. It is the reverse application of the correct Marxism.
And similarly Libertarianism is used by the powerful to keep on abusing the weak.
In the end, the government is the only force that is able to defend the poor and weak against the rich and strong.
No. There is no such category of “good.” That fantasy is more or less what civ/nat whites have pinned their hopes on for at least half a century. Look around and tell us how it has worked out.
Well … “Up to a point, Lord Copper.” Whites must take the lead and act as if it all depends on them. If some Asians or Latinos see whites as achieving their ends and want to cooperate, fine. But whites must not start out trying to please or win them over.
I haven’t the smallest idea who Therese Johaug is, but she’s pretty, right enough.
What is your point?
There is no such thing as Teutonic Aryan/Indian !! If you were to invent one he would probably look like Joseph Goebbels. It is a mystery why the Nazis wanted to be Indians to consider themselves beautiful and superior and kill a lot of innocent people.
The wife of Joseph Goebbels was an ordinary German woman.
If one sees one’s feces while sitting astride the porcelain steed, one has obviously mounted much too late.
Very interesting argument.
Thanks for contributing.
When it comes to Marx, right-wingers display an almost universal desire to throw the baby out with the bath water.
After studying the topic, it seems to me that while Marx’s project was fatally flawed, his critique was and is quite trenchant. Even inveterate capitalists could profit by learning from it.
True believers, though, can never admit any validity to the opposing side. So we get terminally partisan politics, and wars; both civil and otherwise.
Just out of curiosity, what does Tobias Langdon look like? Or does he not wish to show his face?
Have you seen a photo (or more) or Valeria Lukyanova, the Ukrainian “Barbie Doll” who is all over the Web? She’s absolutely incredible. Her face and figure are stunning.