The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Chris Hedges Archive
Don’t Deify Jimmy Carter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
This, That or the Other Carter – by Mr. Fish

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
List of Bookmarks

Jimmy Carter, out of office, had the courage to call out the “abominable oppression and persecution” and “strict segregation” of Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza in his 2006 book “Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid.” He dedicated himself to monitoring elections, including his controversial defense of the 2006 election of Hugo Chavez in Venezuela, and championed human rights around the globe. He lambasted the American political process as an “oligarchy” in which “unlimited political bribery” created “a complete subversion of our political system as a payoff to major contributors.”

But Carter’s years as an ex-president should not mask his dogged service to the empire, penchant for fomenting disastrous proxy wars, betrayal of the Palestinians, embrace of punishing neoliberal policies and his subservience to big business when he was in office.

Carter played a significant role in dismantling New Deal legislation with the deregulation of major industries including airlines, banking, trucking, telecommunications, natural gas and railways. He appointed Paul Volcker to the Federal Reserve, who, in an effort to combat inflation, drove up interest rates and pushed the U.S. into the deepest recession since the Great Depression, a move that saw the start of punishing austerity cuts. Carter is the godfather of the pillage known as neoliberalism, a pillage fellow Democrat Bill Clinton would turbo charge.

Carter fell under the disastrous influence of his Svengali-like national security adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski, a Polish exile, who rejected the Nixon-Kissinger reliance on détente with the Soviet Union. Brzezinski’s life’s mission, one that meant he saw the world in black and white, was to confront and destroy the Soviet Union along with any government or movement he deemed to be under communist influence or sympathetic to it.

Carter, under Brzezinski’s influence, walked away from the Strategic Arms Limitation Talks treaty (SALT II) with the Soviet Union, which sought to curb nuclear weapons deployment. He increased military spending. He sent military aid to the Indonesian New Order government during the Indonesian invasion and occupation of East Timor, which many have characterized as a genocide. He supported, along with the apartheid state of South Africa, the murderous counter revolutionary group, the National Union for the Total Independence of Angola (UNITA), led by Jonas Savimbi. He provided aid to the brutal Zairian dictator Mobutu Sese Seko. He supported the Khmer Rouge.

He instructed the Central Intelligence Agency to back opposition groups and political parties to bring down the Sandinista government in Nicaragua once it took power in 1979, leading under the Reagan administration to the formation of the Contras and a bloody and senseless U.S.-backed insurgency. He provided military aid to the dictatorship in El Salvador, ignoring an appeal from Archbishop Oscar Romero — later assassinated — to cease U.S. arms shipments.

He poisoned U.S. relations with Iran by backing the repressive regime of Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi until the last minute and then allowing the deposed Shah to seek medical treatment in New York, triggering the occupation of the U.S. Embassy in Tehran and a 444-day hostage crisis. Carter’s belligerence — he froze Iranian assets, stopped importing oil from Iran and expelled 183 Iranian diplomats from the U.S. — played into Ayatollah Khomeini’s demonization of the U.S. and calls for Islamic rule. He obliterated the credibility of Iran’s secular opposition.

Carter gave Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos, although he ruled under martial law, billions in military aid. He armed the Mujahideen in Afghanistan after the Soviet intervention in 1979, a decision that cost the U.S. $3 billion, saw the deaths of 1.5 million Afghans and led to the creation of the Taliban and Al Qaeda. The blowback from this Carter policy alone is catastrophic.

He backed the South Korean military in 1980 when it laid siege to the city of Gwangju, where protestors had formed a militia, which led to the massacre of some 2,000 people.

Finally, he sold out the Palestinians when he negotiated a separate peace deal, known as the Camp David Accords, in 1979 between Egyptian President Anwar Sadat and Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin. The agreement excluded the Palestine Liberation Organization from the talks. Israel never, as promised to Carter, attempted to resolve the Palestine question with Jordan and Egypt’s involvement. It never permitted Palestinian self-government in the West Bank and Gaza within five years. It did not end Israeli settlements — a refusal that led Carter to later claim Begin had lied to him. But since there was no mechanism in the agreement for enforcement, and since Carter was unwilling to defy the Israel lobby to impose sanctions on Israel, the Palestinians found themselves, once again, powerless and abandoned.

Carter, to his credit, did appoint the civil rights activist Patricia Derian as his Assistant Secretary of State for Human Rights and Humanitarian Affairs, leading to the blocking of loans and reduction in military aid to the military junta in Argentina during the Dirty War, restrictions the Reagan administration removed. Derian’s commitment to human rights was genuine. She supported Philippines leader Benigno S. Aquino Jr. and the South Korean dissident and former president Kim Dae-jung. Carter allowed her to anger a few of our most repressive allies. But his human rights policy was primarily designed to back democratic dissidents and worker movements in Central and Eastern Europe, especially Poland, in an effort to weaken the Soviet Union.

Carter had a decency most politicians lack, but his moral crusades, which came once he was out of power, seem like a form of penance. His record as president is bloody and dismal, although not as bloody and dismal as the presidents who followed. That’s the best we can say of him.

(Republished from Scheerpost by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: History, Ideology • Tags: American Military, Jimmy Carter 
Hide 12 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. There is a pathology of the brains of certain damaged individuals that allows them great intellect, high functionality and a reasonableness, which can lead to attaining high office, but when it comes to physical actions they show no morality or lie without compunction, this is the pathology we are now faced with in Western democracies, more than in dictatorships that have these people as rulers as a matter of fact.

    We have to remove these people from the system of gaining power before they attain high office.

    We now have the means in which we can peer inside the skull and see what is happening, where the mask of decency cannot cover a deficiency in frontal lobe control mechanisms in these amoral liars and ruthless users of power.

    Can we afford not to change the limbo bar of selecting those in high office? Our rulers have all our fates in their hands?

    When humanitys’ existence is at stake can we allow the average Joe to select among the ruthless elites hand picked puppet?

    I say this is the challenge for the citizen going forward, particularly of superpowers. It is the most pressing human issue of our time and needs a total concentration and debate above all else, otherwise we will have this endless cycle of voting for supermen who are just another version of the same amoral “elite.”

    Its up to the little guy to go against their deference to power, to demand better or to take our destiny into our own hands instead of leaving it to a ruthless elite.

    So its time to filter those seeking high office, we cannot allow the likes of psychopaths such as Netanyahu to decide our futures…because one day they will push the button, there is nothing surer.

  2. Biden has been such a disaster even worse than Carter. So, maybe Jimmy will get bumped up a notch ahead of Buchanan on the worst presidents list.

    • Replies: @G. Poulin
  3. While President, he had, uh, what shall we say, an elephant in his room.

  4. meamjojo says:

    I never paid any attention to Carter. After leaving office, he seemed like the folksy. peanut farmer who always had a simile on his face, working on building houses and such..

    But after reading some of the recaps on his life, he seems like he was a real PITA to many people.

  5. Anon[314] • Disclaimer says:

    His human rights policy got hijacked

    https://dissidentvoice.org/2015/12/human-rights-defenders/

    We do Carter a disservice by attributing agency to him. He was only head of state. That’s like Vanna White’s job.

  6. Anonymous[478] • Disclaimer says:

    Adjusted for inflation, Carter’s last budget deficit was $240 billion, roughly 1/8 of the deficits that Trump and Biden have run. I am glad he picked Paul Volcker for the Federal Reserve, even though the high interest rates harmed my family. So maybe Carter wasn’t so bad after all.

  7. G. Poulin says:
    @Tennessee Jed

    Buchanan gets a bad rap, particularly from our court historians. He tried to avoid an unnecessary war, one that proved destructive of the constitutional order and the liberties it had attempted to preserve. And it wasn’t Buchanan who got over half a million Americans killed for nothing; that would be Abe Lincoln, our “greatest” president.

  8. I like some things Carter did like pardoning the Vietnam draft evaders and restoring the citizenship of Robert E. Lee, etc (symbolic tho that was) but he wasn’t a great president.

  9. Trinity says:

    Actually (((the media))) isn’t making a big deal about JC. The Jew News went ape over John McCain and Pappy Bush. Like all others that die with the exception of Hitler and Charles Manson, we were told Pappy Bush and Songbird were looking down from Heaven during their funerals. LMAO. Only 2 people in Hell, folks, Crazy Charlie and Uncle Adolf. Lol. Satan must get awful lonely since all scoundrels go to Heaven.

    I say Adolf has a better shot at Heaven than Stalin, FDR, Churchill or Ike. Whatcha say? Crazy Charlie probably didn’t make the cut though.

  10. It’s a leftist, Unwritten Rule: EVERY Demikrat president gets deified, ipso facto, no matter how evil their sins.

  11. Mr. Carter would not want deification. He knew that he was a man, subjected to the same foibles as everyone else. He stumbled through his time on Earth, making mistakes, tripping, falling. Then pulling himself up, to try again.

    In the end, he believed that he was forgiven for his trespasses by the only forgiver that really mattered. If the creator of the universe decides, for some unknowable reason, to save some part of his little experiment in “Universe Creation”, I hope that Mr. Carter is selected to represent the people of Earth.

    The rest of us should aspire to be so deserving.

  12. Antiwar7 says:

    I agree with the general thrust of Hedges’ article, and almost all of his examples, but Hedges gets this wrong:

    “He armed the Mujahideen in Afghanistan after the Soviet intervention in 1979.”

    No, they started arming those Islamic extremists BEFORE the Soviet intervention, in order to draw them in:

    “CIA was aiding Afghan rebels before the Soviets invaded in ’79”

    Source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2019/01/07/history-trump-cia-was-arming-afghan-rebels-before-soviets-invaded

    Also, it was not an “invasion”, as the Washington Post put it. The Soviets were invited in by the Afghan government (the progressive one that educated women and employed women engineers, etc):

    “The Amin government, having secured a treaty in December 1978 that allowed them to call on Soviet forces, repeatedly requested the introduction of troops in Afghanistan in the spring and summer of 1979.”

    Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet%E2%80%93Afghan_War#Soviet_deployment,_1979

    Chris Hedges got a lot wrong in the former Yugoslavia, too, when he was the New York Times correspondent there.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Chris Hedges Comments via RSS