RSS
In recent weeks, the hot topic of discussion in the dissident right has been the merits of meritocracy. More specifically, debate has centered around the question of whether supporting a “colourblind meritocracy” in Western, multiracial societies may be a good way to restore the dominance of White people over their homelands and curtail the radical left. This would involve supporting more establishment rightists and centrists in their quest to fight wokeism, and restoring some of the principles of classical liberalism which these people believe were responsible for the West’s success.
Let me preface this by saying this is a discussion that applies to multicultural societies that are more racially, and less ethnically constructed than European nations. In Europe, I generally do not agree with politically identifying with White over the individual ethnic identity of the nation in question, and I do not think this question is even very relevant since the priority for these nations should be preventing their transition into multiracial societies. Asserting the sovereignty of native European ethnic groups over their ancestral homelands is argument enough in any country in Europe, and getting dragged into discussions of racial differences is unnecessary, except to demonstrate things like disproportionate rates of crime and delinquency for non-European immigrants and bolster arguments against continuing immigration from outside Europe. For Whites in the United States, Canada, and Australia though, questions of race and White identity are far more relevant.
What sparked this debate was reaction to Harvard’s firing of Claudine Gay, its first black president, over allegations of plagiarism. This followed a months-long campaign by elites – spearheaded by hedge fund manager Bill Ackman and comprising mostly Jews – to have Gay fired over her supposed failure to tackle antisemitism at Harvard. As I wrote about recently, October 7th was a big wakeup call for many Jews in the West, especially progressives who realised the wokeism they had supported could lead to a situation where a majority of educated young people view Zionist Jews like them as oppressors.
In his quest to oust Ms. Gay, Ackman and his fellow Zionist power-brokers were aided by “anti-woke” activists like Christopher Rufo, who helped to compile over 50 instances of alleged plagiarism in Gay’s academic works. While Harvard initially stood by her, she eventually resigned. Most of the online right celebrated this as an obvious win. Here was a clear instance of someone who had benefited from an anti-White system being exposed as a fraud; an apparent example of a major success story of diversity becoming a very public embarrassment for the champions of diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI).
For some on the right, this represented not just a brief opportunity for gloating over the left, but the first signpost of a promising path forward. Cynical as we may be about the rhetoric of a James Lindsay or Christopher Rufo, they had delivered a real blow to the establishment, and with the help of backers like Ackman, were now making the intellectual challenge to wokeism more mainstream than it had ever been. At the same time, there is an apparent trend of rich, White elites becoming concerned that wokeism will lead to a “competency crisis” due to DEI hiring policies selecting for things other than merit. Elon Musk has been broadcasting this concern to his millions of followers on X, and likely represents a growing number of capitalist innovators who now perceive a realistic threat to their projects from the left’s social agenda.
On the day of Gay’s resignation, Twitter personality Bronze Age Pervert affirmed this strategy of embracing colourblind meritocracy as the way forward, given that truths about race differences are unpalatable to anyone but a small subsection of the online right. BAP argues:
While for the sake of truth I think facts about racial disparities should be discussed, it’s not good at all politically. In fact it’s impossible in the present circumstances. Only a myth of race blindness is workable…The only solution in [the] short run is race blindness, stopping and reversing all racialization of politics and society…The “HBD position” is an impossibility politically and culturally today.
Many of BAP’s followers rushed to defend this argument, urging the right to embrace a spirit of pragmatism and build on the wins offered by the growing fatigue over wokeism and DEI policies. Others have expressed great optimism about the prospect of elite Jews, who exercise great influence over the direction of politics in the United States, turning on DEI policies and empowering the anti-woke crusaders. The argument put forward by nationalists arguing for this strategy is this:
- Although race realism contains facts which undermine egalitarianism, such facts will be rejected by most conservatives who oppose wokeism.
- Because of the reality of racial differences, we know that in a colourblind meritocratic order White people would naturally dominate institutions again.
- Opposing wokeism with meritocratic ideals is popular with a majority of people, and has growing support from elites.
- Therefore, the most feasible way to achieve White dominance over our homelands is to support colourblind meritocracy.
Further supporting their case, it does seem like the American Conservative movement is increasingly finding the courage to strike at the root of DEI policies. Taking their cue from right-wing intellectuals who have traced wokeism to Civil Rights law. “Repeal the Civil Rights Act” is an increasingly common demand among centre-right influencers, as is the willingness to challenge the legacy of figures like Martin Luther King. Relative to where political discourse was a decade ago, this is quite radical. If there was one thing Republicans and Democrats agreed on, it was living up to the ideals of Martin Luther King. So the right is more willing than ever to throw out the entire legacy of civil rights law, affirmative action, forced integration… what’s not to love?
The need for an honest approach
Much of the optimism around this assumes elite Jews like Ackman are really turning on DEI policies in a way that will benefit White people. Ackman has supported these DEI policies for years, but perhaps his eyes have been opened since October 7th. Even if elite Jews are pushing back primarily because of their concern about antisemitism, White people will still benefit from this, and perhaps even make alliances with these elites. This is similar to nationalists seeing promise in Western states talking about deporting Hamas sympathisers since October 7th, an apparent opportunity to normalise repatriation – a policy that would benefit the White majority – through outrage over antisemitism.
Months on from the events of October 7th, what is there to show for this? Claudine Gay resigned, and her role was filled by Alan Garber, someone who has expressed equal support for DEI policies, but is presumably more sensitive to antisemitism as someone who is himself Jewish. Then, Bill Ackman announced his intention to donate a million dollars to a Jewish Democrat candidate who has a long history of sponsoring and supporting bills forcing DEI policies on the corporate world. Clearly, Ackman has not had a great change of heart on anti-White DEI policies, he simply wants to correct them to better protect Jews. Leading campaigns to fire people for not properly policing antisemitism is an extension, not a rolling back of wokeism. It is also demoralising for White people to be told they must constantly put themselves in a subordinate position to other groups – in this case elite Jews – to be allowed to get their issue in the back door. Eventually, White people will have to begin to assert their interests, as Whites, in multiracial societies. The search for “clever” ways to advocate for these interests without being seen to advocate for them is an admission that it is either morally wrong or practically unfeasible to expect the interests of White people to be represented – both of these admissions are unacceptable.
But let’s assume that even without the support of elite Jews like Ackman that there is a big opportunity to make ground pushing back against wokeism with liberal ideals. What would be wrong with this in theory? There are a couple of issues with this approach. First, the idea that race differences are so taboo that they can never be normalised among conservatives doesn’t seem very convincing. Second, and more importantly, if we deny or ignore the facts of natural racial inequalities, disparities in outcome between races cannot be explained without supposing institutional racism.
To the first point: knowledge of natural racial differences is already more common than these people would have you believe. One study found that 41% of US adults were aware of an IQ gap between White and Black Americans, and this number rose to 59% for conservative Whites.
This study was published in 2020, and in the years since, many influential conservatives have begun to amplify posts about crime, achievement, and IQ gaps between racial groups. This explicit recognition extends beyond political influencers too, with Elon Musk regularly boosting content on X that shows the disparity in crime numbers between these groups. While this doesn’t say anything about natural racial differences being the cause, a good chunk of people will infer that when such glaring and consistent disparities are presented to them. Also since 2020 and the Summer of Floyd, right-wing social media has abounded in video footage of Black-on-White violence. While much of the discourse around race realism, or “Human Biodiversity”, is quite technical and academic, conservatives do not need to understand complex facts about the science of genetics to acknowledge something that was an unspoken truth for their ancestors: different racial groups are different in a variety of ways to Whites, and this affects how they perform in White society.
Just a few years ago, it would have seemed unthinkable to have establishment conservatives like Charlie Kirk challenging the legacy of MLK, arguing to dismantle Civil Rights law, and saying that current immigration policy is facilitating the Great Replacement. Is it really such a stretch to think they might also acknowledge a disparity in IQ between racial groups, and tell their audience this is responsible for a large part of the disparity in outcomes between groups? After Charles Murray published his book The Bell Curve, which argued exactly this, he was hosted on many mainstream talk shows to discuss his controversial findings. That was only three decades ago. Back then, this seemed less controversial than talking about a great replacement of White people or opposing Civil Rights law. There is no reason the same could not occur again, especially now that platforms like X and Rumble have allowed for greater free speech on taboo topics like race.
The more fundamental problem with endorsing colourblind meritocracy is that ignoring racial differences means we are unable to offer a credible explanation for the consistent gaps in achievement across races. If all racial groups are about equal in their natural abilities, what would explain these gaps except some kind of institutional racism or Whites being advantaged by historical injustices? Race realism offers simple but powerful explanations for these gaps. To take an obvious example like IQ: so-called “twin studies” lean highly on the nature side of the nature versus nurture debate, showing that IQ is about 80% heritable. Study after study has shown significant and consistent disparities in IQ between races in multiracial societies like the United States. This gap is about 15 points between Blacks and Whites in the United States, for example. If such a gap exists, there is nothing alarming about a significant gap in representation in the education system.
We can laugh at the left’s obsessive search for racism everywhere, but would this not be a reasonable assumption if we agreed on their premise of egalitarianism? Certainly, the alternative explanations put forward by conservatives for Black underachievement – welfare, rap music, Black fatherlessness (caused by what?), the bigotry of low expectations – are very unconvincing, sometimes laughably so, to any intelligent person.
Maybe you don’t think this matters, since anyone concerned about things like “systemic racism” would never be on our side anyway, but the gaping hole of an explanation for racial inequality left by conservatives egalitarian premises leaves them unable to rationally defend their worldview. Many people that would typically be moderate or even conservative-leaning believe there is some remaining problem of racism holding Black people back. If people realised that the left is trying to correct a problem which cannot be corrected by affirmative action or training against implicit bias, they would see DEI policies more clearly as an attack on the White majority than simply misguided but well-intentioned policies to correct an unfair disparity.
Challenging the myth of equality is key. Here, I agree with Nathan Cofnas’ basic analysis of wokeism as: “simply what follows from taking the equality thesis of race and sex differences seriously, given a background of Christian morality.”
The real origins of woke
Cofnas’ basic moral equation for the origin of wokeness as biological egalitarianism plus a Christian informed belief about the universal dignity of the individual is a far more convincing explanation than that of Richard Hanania, who authored The Origins of Woke and who is starting to get a hearing from mainstream conservatives. Hanania argues that Wokeism followed as a necessary outgrowth of Civil Rights law, which forced corporations to “go woke”, not only through shaping hiring practices, but by creating a threat of litigation under the law. This legal threat forced businesses to be proactive about buffering themselves against accusations of discrimination, employing bloated HR departments and implementing increasingly woke political correctness and diversity training. This already fails to account for hedge fund managers like Larry Fink and Bill Ackman who have shown a commitment to actively promoting DEI and affirmative action regardless of a potential decline in efficiency.
But if Hanania is correct that Civil Rights law is the prime mover of wokeism, then the colourblind meritocracy route would indeed go a long way to solving our problems, since we need only remove the legal force driving it and the crazed social justice warriors would suddenly lose their influence over the corporate world. But Western European countries went just as woke as the United States on a similar timeline, informed not by overreaching civil rights legislation, but by the same egalitarian ideals that became dominant in the US after the Second World War. In the 1950s, UNESCO published their statements on race, drafted by a committee of mostly Boasian cultural anthropologists, and these were broadcast in publications like the New York Times as a definitive proclamation of racial egalitarianism. The same statements were cited in legal cases like Brown vs. Board of Education to roll back segregation. Before Civil Rights law created an oppressive structure of legal pressures on the private sector to embrace political correctness, the ruling elite had already abandoned what they viewed as antiquated ideas of race science for in vogue ideas like cultural relativism, racial egalitarianism and pluralism. Conservatives fail so abysmally at fighting wokeism not just because they unknowingly have a hand tied behind their back by Civil Rights law – they also fail to properly challenge it even in the realm of ideas, as they agree with the premises which inform it.
As Cofnas explains:
Mainstream conservatives are unable to effectively push back against wokism because they accept the premises—both empirical and moral—that entail it. That’s why conservatives can’t describe what wokism is, because that would reveal their own failure to follow their beliefs to their logical conclusion. You can see conservative writer Bethany Mandel’s brain melt like warm ice cream when she is asked to define “woke.” Other conservatives propose vague or tendentious definitions that would never be accepted by wokesters themselves. A recent National Review article titled “It’s Not Hard to Define Wokeness If You’re Honest” says that there are five “core elements” including “Woke ideology obsesses over hierarchies among identity groups” and “Woke ideology aims to be constantly evolving rather than a fixed doctrine.” Conservatives cannot actually be honest and admit that wokism is what happens when people are serious about the equality thesis, because they themselves accept—or at least pretend to accept—the claim that all groups are innately the same.
If we accept the equality thesis and push on with arguments for a colourblind meritocracy, we will inevitably end up on the same merry-go-round of intelligent and fair-minded White people becoming convinced that the disparities that persist in the implementation of such a meritocracy are due to systemic racism, and they will continue to support or tolerate “woke” policies to try and remedy them.
Race realism alone is not enough
Cofnas does a good job explaining the true origin of wokeism as a necessary outgrowth of the claims of egalitarianism, and in arguing that failure to challenge this leads to a “stupidity problem” on the right, as more intelligent Whites are drawn to politics which offer serious policy remedies to inequality. But Cofnas is not any kind of White identitarian, and he favours the Charles Murray approach of maintaining a liberal, meritocratic society while simply being honest about natural racial differences. We simply need to explain to the public that disparities between groups are quite natural and not something to be upset over. We don’t want Whites to lord it over non-Whites due to certain cognitive inequalities, but neither is it fair to punish groups like Whites, Asians and Jews for their superior performance in certain fields with affirmative action quotas. We can deliver everyone the good news that since racial egalitarianism was always a fiction, inequality between races is no big deal, and wokeism is unnecessary. Then the left can get back to focusing on more important issues like workers’ rights and environmentalism.
The Cofnas/Murray approach to fighting wokeism then, is race realism without racial identitarianism. We can acknowledge differences in races while still preserving a colourblind meritocracy and giving any individual from any group the opportunity to reach his full potential. Is this a better approach? It has more to recommend it than the first, since it is more honest, better able to explain the world, and offers a challenge to wokeism at the most fundamental level of challenging the myth of egalitarianism.
The problem, though, is that no amount of studies or argumentation will convince minority racial groups in the West that their unequal share of outcomes is fair. Generally, minorities – or their representatives, at least – will not accept a disparity in something like IQ as reflecting anything but the racism of the society which devised the tests. Regardless of what we say about race differences, all races other than White people will continue to play identity politics and seek as much advantage for their group as possible. The anti-White animus so prevalent today is not just motivated by minorities mistakenly perceiving injustices – there is evidently a deeper resentment toward White people which wokeism has simply empowered. It won’t take long examining immigration discussion on social media to find ample examples of new arrivals to the West celebrating the ethnocide of Europeans as karmic justice for their collective sin of colonialism, even if it is against countries with no imperial past like Ireland. Will any of this go away for Whites in multiracial societies like the United Sates if meritocracy is restored? Will White people doubling down on their commitment to colourblind politics stop “woke” racial lobbies from viewing them as oppressors?
If we removed racial preference for non-Whites in policy and Blacks began to be locked up in even greater numbers and had their representation in higher education diminish, they would demand an answer, and discussion of time-horizons and IQ gaps wouldn’t cut it. While we can make many White people aware of some basic truths of race realism, many will continue to reject them as an article of faith, and for those who accept them, maintaining fair competence hierarchies in the education system isn’t a very strong motive for driving social change, especially when it involves delivering some very uncomfortable truths to entire groups who feel under attack for their race. After all, isn’t this much the same as the situation in the 1960s, when most Whites obviously perceived profound differences between themselves and Black Americans, but tolerated and eventually embraced the egalitarian presuppositions of Civil Rights law?
Consider the statistic earlier, which revealed that almost 60% of conservative Whites in America know that an IQ gap exists between races. Most would probably never have guessed the number is that high. Can you recall hearing a Republican politician or a popular pundit point to differences in IQ as an explanation for the achievement gap between races? Even with a majority quietly agreeing, it would be enormously controversial to go there, so this is not just a problem of a false empirical belief about egalitarianism, as Cofnas suggests. No, talking about this would be controversial because it would so shock the liberal sensibilities of conservatives. It would seem an unnecessarily harsh and limiting truth for people that genuinely do believe in the ideal of a colourblind meritocracy. It would enter into the uncomfortable territory of dividing humanity into groups, defining individuals by their race, justifying certain prejudices, and limiting the potential of the individual.
What Cofnas’ analysis is missing is an understanding of why Conservatives go along with the myth of racial egalitarianism: for most it is not because they genuinely believe it, but because acknowledging group differences, or using the lens of race to analyse anything, seems to them to be a violation of the most basic principles of individualism. To get over the taboo of talking about racial differences, White conservatives need to get over the taboo of talking about race as something deeper than skin colour, and that means also acknowledging that they, as Whites, have interests.
What Whites in multiracial societies need is not merely truths about race or a principled opposition to DEI policies, but a willingness to engage with both from the starting point of a White identity politics. Mere concern for fairness will not mobilise the right to match the fervour of the woke left, overlooking glaringly obvious truths about race will leave our explanation of the world incomplete, and a refusal to engage in identity politics will mean again acceding to the organised racial lobbies and anti-White factions which currently dominate Western societies.
The reality of racial differences should be presented honestly, not just to explain disparate outcomes in economics and education, but to show conservative White people that there are more fundamental differences between us and other groups which cannot be sidestepped with appeals to individualism. Facts about racial differences, like all scientific facts, are value neutral. Our goal should be to show that these truths, alongside a wealth of sociological and historical evidence, show that Whites will need collective action to navigate a multiracial society.
Then, we must make the moral case that White people are entitled to utter a hard “no” to the many groups who take advantage of our naive commitment to individualism and egalitarianism. Only then will we see a lasting rolling back of wokeism.
English
Arabic
Chinese (Simplified)
Dutch
French
German
Hebrew
Hindi
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Russian
Spanish
Swedish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Cremieux apparently found the average brain volume from the ABCD data to be:
1238.77 for Whites
1188.89 for Hispanics
1136.55 for Blacks
Around 100cc is generally reported as being the standard deviation for brain volumes, implying that whites have brains which are ~0.5sd larger than Hispanics and ~1.0sd larger than blacks. This, coincidentally or not, roughly corresponds to the ~0.5sd IQ difference that’s generally found between whites and Hispanics and ~1.0sd IQ difference that’s found between whites and blacks.
Cremieux also reported that, in ABCD, the average brain volume of whites is greater than that for Asians (though I didn’t see him report data for this, unfortunately).
This might seem surprising if you’re used to looking at J. Philippe Rushton’s studies, but Rushton, as documented by Edward Dutton, employed a number of questionable practices in much of his work.** He also, if I’m not mistaken, often scaled up Asian brain volume to reflect what it would be, if Asians were as tall as whites are. That is, in absolute terms, Asians have slightly smaller brains than whites, but in terms of the brain-to-body-size-ratio, they’re perhaps slightly larger.***
It would be nice if someone who has access to the ABCD data could produce a table and/or chart like the one which Keith included above (produced by “Cremieux Recueil”, showing IQ scores for different ethnic groups in the ABCD study) but for brain volume instead. It would also be nice to see this for *all* of the different ethnic groups in ABCD, even those with small sample sizes (just as was done with IQ) showing the mean brain volume together with a confidence interval.
Importantly, it would be nice to see such tables for both ethnic groups *and* religious groups.
From other studies that I’ve seen I suspect that you will find that certain groups that do well on “IQ” actually have smaller brain volumes than you might expect. A good example of this will likely be South Asians. You will also find that white Christians underperform for the brain volume that they have relative to groups who have a strong culture for education, like North East Asian immigrants, high-caste South Asian Brahmins and Jews.
One possible interpretation will be that there’s essentially three different factors that tend to raise group IQs. One is belonging to a historically privileged professional caste, as you find of Brahmins and Jews, two is being the child of ambitious tiger parent recent immigrants from, particularly, North East Asia, and third is having a genetic predisposition for high intelligence which, physiologically speaking, is best (if crudely) measured at present by looking at gross brain volume. There you will find that European Christians (particularly Northern Europeans) and, perhaps to a slightly lesser extent, North East Asians (and perhaps Arctic populations), lead the pack.
** Dutton on Rushton: https://www.bitchute *DOT* com/video/gHhLbViypg9F/
*** You might ask: What’s more important absolute size or relative size? I don’t know the answer to that, but I have seen a number of studies report that there’s a clear correlation between absolute brain size and IQ but I don’t recall ever seeing a study claim that incorporating brain-to-body-size-ratio adds any predictive value to what gross brain size alone gives you. It might though. And if so, how much?
Mr. Woods seemingly ignores the fact that we cannot, from our knowledge about statistical averages, draw conclusions about single persons. Which means that in practice we have to judge each person by his/her personal abilities, i.e. from a position of “colourblind meritocracy”. (We can of course refute arguments for equality, as long as they concern whole groups and not individuals.)
Stuff like this cracks me up.
Jew vs black is the funniest.
“Woke” just means jewish and anti White. There is no “woke” without the “kike”.
Nick Fuentes offers more disturbing insight:
Video Link
Diversity Inclusion Equity (DIE): Humanity’s Lowest Common Denominator
https://www.globalresearch.ca/wef-davos-2024-world-falling-apart-show-must-go-on/
Video Link
Since when have the clannish Jews ever been hurt by affirmative action? I see no evidence for this. It is Caucasians and Asians who are hurt the most by the Jew-promoted diversity, equity and inclusiveness movement.
“Wokeism” is a projected superform of solipsism.
There’s only one way to contraindicate solipsism.
There is then the threshold, what scale of that one way is necessary? Against people who sexually mutilate themselves, psychologically torture themselves, and prey on the weak in general and children in particular? Against those like Gyorgy Schwartz who have already sold out their own people with pleasure while they were juveniles? Their senses are as deadened as their sensibilities, they are mostly inured to the torment they cause themselves, and they no longer even remember that they forgot the distinction between right and wrong.
Sure, some will break at any given point before that, submissive men, and women who bend in the breeze, but it didn’t start from “some”. It started from people who were already operating in a society entirely against them, who now also have the taste of many victories. For those, the answer is the same as it always was, the same as for our traitors who have to go first, because nothing less will ever do.
“Face the wall, and may God have mercy on your wretched soul.”
We can and do draw conclusions about single people from averages and statistics. Stereotypes exist for the reason that they are general and accurate, and that generalities are the necessary and permanent state of human operations, from complete generality to increasing fidelity, yet always you are still operating on a generality compared to hypothetical future states.
You don’t know everything about a person when you first encounter them. You don’t know jack all. You get what you see about the environment, and your previous experiences and learned information about what they appear to be, moment by moment as they emerge from the darkness and onto the stage.
Judging a person by his personality and abilities is great, AND IMPOSSIBLE UNTIL YOU HAVE A LOT OF EXPERIENCE WITH HIM, WHICH YOU OFTEN DO NOT HAVE THE LUXURY OF WAITING TO ACCRUE.
Viewing someone from colorblind meritocracy is stupid before you have had adequate time to engage it, which is always, until testing is complete. You see in color, apply that ability or suffer the consequences of pretending you can’t.
Moreover, the larger the population section, the more reliable the statistic is as a representation of it.
Your complaint is childish and ignorant rhetorical boilerplate. Please sit down and let the adults talk.
Sure, white score higher on IQ tests. So what? Since 1965 they’ve commited suicide by voting for (((whores))) who put in place stuff to screw them over. How smart is that?
From Paul Craig Roberts at https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2024/01/25/the-western-world-rip/
“I have come to the depressing conclusion that the white ethnicities that constituted the nations of Western Civilization have degenerated into such insouciance and stupidity that they have no possibility of survival. They sit mindlessly in front of TV absorbing their brainwashing and indoctrination. They can’t pay their rent, mortgage or car payments, but they pay endlessly for care of immigrant-invaders who are overwhelming their communities with material needs.”
Whites do good on IQ tests but they have zero street smarts or common sense. They argue about which billionaire NFL team will win the next game as their world collapses around them.
Keith Woods was on Twitter promoting ‘Judaism is an ethnicity’, lol.
Here’s his countryman, perpetrating a fraud in Israel:
Keith Woods has the intellect of a schoolboy. i’d run laps around him.
That’s why we have equal protection under law
Yes, although this argument can go back as far as you need it to. The U.S. was designed as a white ethnostate, with some laws explicit to that effect, but we were still led down this path in the end. I support a return to white identity politics, but I’m not sure how that problem of gradual corrosion can be permanently solved.
I do think winning over the American people is entirely within reach. Last week’s debate between Ben Shapiro and Destiny touched on this. The left’s top guy tried to seriously argue that the failures of the American education system could be solved by air conditioning and free food. It’s an incredibly unconvincing argument that even he had to retreat from. Race realists offer much more compelling reasons and data for why education is how it is. Moving ordinary Americans to our school of thought only depends on getting them past their aversion to admitting racial differences.
Though blacks and Hispanics have more dysgenic fertility patterns relative to whites and Asians, so there will be a smaller % of blacks and Hispanics among top performers relative to whites and Asians in the future, all else being equal.
And? What’s wrong with that?
There are three problems, harmful to me, that are now intractable. First, there exists a multitude of behind-the-scenes occupations in which I have no control over the person who will be actually handling my need. For example, I can control who is my dermatologist, but despite all my ingenuity I cannot ensure who will be the pathologist preparing and examining the biopsy slides. Second, educational training and performance standards have been lowered for not just the non-meritorious, but for everybody. Third, through a process shrinks call “mirroring,” many traditional workers will simply decide, Why should I bust my tail being 100% conscientious and meticulous.
Everytime I see an IQ graph I see how the Human race as a whole has been murderously dumbed down by the Elites, Corporations, Governments and other Tribes , so that they can have it all. What would our IQs had been, if we had been left alone to study and produce for the good of mankind, compared to what we are now? OK, the Asian and Whites are the smartest, but how much more intelligence, would we have brought the others , as we ourselves evolved into the capacity that our brains could handle? I think a whole lot !
While we are all dreaming about IQs anyways – what if us Humans, living on this nice pretty blue planet, is one of the last Human groups left untouched by the other High Tech assholes that want to convert us? All we have as evidence, are rough sketches that either the US or CCCP have made pertaining to Alien life forms – and we look pretty damn normal and natural compared to them. lol Are all those hi tech space weapons, that we all know the USA has, pointed down at us, and pointed up at someone else, keeping both sides from contacting each other ? My IQ just went up 30 points , if I’m correct.
White Men need to get together and support their own interests and no one else.
This Anti White system will fall down and sink into the swamp without White Men.
Don’t support ZOG or it’s Anti White system.
Don’t help the other races at all and keep your own race as the only one that matters.
Crayola politics has painted the fake jew as a racist colonial oppressor of brown people.
Don’t expect that to make them change their Anti White policies.
ZOG has no friends anymore and now is the time to sabotage and destroy them.
Reduce your taxes to as close to zero as possible.
Barter goods and services without using any of the jew funny money.
Starve your enemies by not cooperating with the failed state.
The time for talk is long since past.
This is a war against you and your family.
Get into a martial mindset and prepare to defend yourself against the other races.
The fake jew can be destroyed by the very policies of brown power.
You need to get together with other White Men.
This war has been going on for decades.
It’s long past time to get serious about survival.
The failed state is near bankruptcy now.
Uncle Sham can’t get it up anymore and you can do damage to them by not cooperating.
When the EBT runs out, there will be violence and mayhem.
You must defend yourself from attack and try to bring your enemies to fight each other.
The AntiWhite coalition is falling apart and they really hate each other.
Protect yourself and your family by getting together with other White Men.
Look to see where the fake jew lives.
When the shit hits the fan, you need to push the brown hordes into the fake jew neighborhoods.
Let them fight and kill each other.
Gaza has been seen through the lens of Crayola politics and its put a target on their back.
The fake jew is now a racist colonial oppressor who supports an apartheid regime.
Use this to your advantage and make sure that you are ready for The End of ZOG.
The time is closer than you believe it is.
Uncle Sham can’t pay his bills and now he’s going to have to pay over One Trillion dollars for interest on his debts.
Soon the cost of financing the debt will exceed what Uncle Sham can borrow.
When that happens all the checks will begin to bounce like super balls.
This is the day the EBT runs out.
You’re too smart to say dumb things like this.
Normiecons have been explaining for decades that racial disparities are at least partly the result of institutional “anti-racism” combined with toxic cultural values that blacks themselves promote. Even without getting into HBD, no honest person can say that all problems blacks face are due to white supremacy. Obviously, there are genetic limits at play, but appeals for blacks to adopt better habits and for the government to stop trying to keep blacks on the proverbial plantation would indeed help to reduce racial disparities if sincerely implemented.
Encouraging some level of pro-white white collectivism is probably necessary, but it’s certainly not the whole solution.
It’s laughable that we’re even considering the academic credentials of such a moron. Were she white, she’d be waiting tables at a local diner and be happy for the opportunity.
A looooong, tedious article, bringing us to the obvious conclusion that meritocracy, unbridled by political correctness, will give us the desired outcome. Let’s wake up and do what’s needed.
“Much of the optimism around this assumes elite Jews like Ackman are really turning on DEI policies in a way that will benefit White people. Ackman has supported these DEI policies for years, but perhaps his eyes have been opened since October 7th. Even if elite Jews are pushing back primarily because of their concern about antisemitism, White people will still benefit from this, and perhaps even make alliances with these elites. This is similar to nationalists seeing promise in Western states talking about deporting Hamas sympathisers since October 7th, an apparent opportunity to normalise repatriation – a policy that would benefit the White majority – through outrage over antisemitism.”
This is not only shameful, it’s absurd – the minute opposing DEI is no longer useful to the rats it’ll start again. Never ally with the rats, it’s a fool’s errand
Gay’s situation had/has nothing to do with ‘wokeism’ or the debate about meritocracy. To even argue that way is an act of obfuscation.
Gay wasn’t sufficiently pro-Jew at a Jewish institution.. It’s that simple. She’d still be president of Harvard if she hadn’t brought Jews into the picture.
All the talk about IQ, Bell Curves, academic merit etc. is just so much nonsense in Gay’s context.
Many conservatives who are parents or willing to be have embraced blank slatism pseudoscience because they like to think nurturing is more important than nature, specially when their kids are more socially succesfull, and then applying it to other topics like racial differences. In the end of day, denying facts which can be verified even at naked eye observation is often due to personal vanity.
About racial differences in intelligence and behavior, racial realists tend not to find better ways, even more nuanced and comprehensive, to make this truth more palatable to the “sensitive” mainstream, like emphasising the complex and partially relative nature of it, for example, showing that, if given racial group is on avg smarter than other, doesnt mean the less smart group is necessarily dumber, or that there are individuals coming from less smart racial or ethnic groups who are smarter than most of people from smarter groups, etc… But this topic, while related with racial advocacy for White people, is more separated, because the main arguments against Whites are of moral and not purely intellectual type. Fighting anti white/”anti racist” narratives is more important here.
Anyway, i think the so called Left is hopeless. They are and always have been a religious cult. So the biggest problem, something this text is figuring out, is not brainless woke zombies, the goy army, but White conservatives themselves, weaker, divided on overcapitalists and ethnonationalists, and excessively dependent on state to act… Understanding that the current Western governments are taken by mentally disordered Jews and their alliars, you should start to organize themselves, intelligently, RATIONALLY, canalizing on what’s matter most.
Other important thing. One of the biggest card used by Jews and co is the moral righteouness, using emotional blackmail to advance their interests and making their enemies look like the only evil ones. And what, from mainstream to far, the Right have done??? Accepted this role of insensitive tough guys. You are basically acting the way they want or expect you to act… You cant win being dumb and, yes, naive, playing your enemy game…
What’s being discussed here is how our societies are organized. Hypothetical black super geniuses aren’t very salient in such discussions.
Your comment is quite funny. It’s like Keith said “watch conservatives walk face first into this brick wall” and then you came along and did exactly that.
He’s saying it’s a problem from the perspective of jews.
Can you people even read?
The stupidity in the comment section really gives me pause.
The way to defeat wokism is by removing its source of funding. Duh!
The woke are almost entirely from the Humanities and Social Sciences and it is their position in society that provides them a living by being the frauds in economics, law, education, etc.
For the society to survive, the Humanities and Social Sciences need to be minimized in the extreme to get rid of the frauds in the society that can’t empirically prove what they say is true. These people should all be behind a counter asking ‘do you want fries with that’ instead of being in the media spouting their nonsense.
Take economics for example. Economists generally are the whores for the bankers and bureaucrats. They will write up any proposal for a fee and can in the next moment write up another one counter to the first, again for their 30 pieces of silver. There are several dozen ‘schools’ of economics that disagree with each other and yet, we are supposed to listen to their council.
Economics is a religion that requires no proof to make their ridiculous assertions that have, for example, removed actual money from society in favor of fiat currency. With few exceptions, economists are a malignancy that needs to be excised so that honest money and clear thinking can once again prevail in the market.
Look around at all the people and ‘professions’ that exist by preaching that which can’t be proven empirically and you’ll get an understanding of the immensity of the problem. The greatest evil of all, government, is headed by con artists whose only real skill is getting elected by the terminally stupid. Politicians are useless eaters that prey upon the society and yet, the unthinking rabble keep putting them in charge of an enterprise that is failing and has been failing for at least the last 70 years.
If you want to get rid of woke, starve the fraudulent professions in the society to remove their means of support. I say cancel the Humanities and Social Science degrees for fraud and remove their aura of respectability to force them to do something beneficial for the society for their livelihood. By allowing the continuous generation of new entrants to these fraudulent professions, it signals a never ending and growing problem, seeing as how the stupid in the society ‘earn’ these bogus degrees.
Exactly.
There was no mention of the controversy over plagiarism committed by Ackman’s wife, which is also a factor in Ackman’s wrath – an attack on another Jew.
If we can not say – They are not capable, in general, of excelling in the same manner of Whites/European people, in general – then we will always be looking for and dealing with the reasons (excuses) for why they can’t/won’t find equivalency with Whites.
It is telling, is it not, that advocating for White people, in a White nation, is a political and cultural impossibility. That indicates that White people ain’t runnin’ the show; not in politics, nor academia, nor media.
The black man in the overalls, on the Montel show, was great. Montel shut him down the minute he brought up the generally unknown fact that Jewry was heavily involved in the Atlantic slave trade. The Jews have always been involved in profiteering from human misery, be it slavery, war, short-selling, and bailing-out debtors for pennies on the dollar – speaking of dollars, it’s a good thing our Christmas gift of the not-Federal Federal Reserve occurred just in time to fund the Great War, which was great for the Jews, and no one else.
Ackman certainly looks white; his Jewish wife is stunning, and looks white, as well. Of course, many Ashkenazim look European, and I’ve read it was intentional – this infusing with European Gentile blood – for access to Gentile society, and access to the characteristic “uplift” that Aryan/Nordic/White DNA brings to a lesser gifted racial group. Their plan seems to be working.
Let me give you a real world explanation of Jews- in real time.
I work a second job as a lawyer. It’s remote. Twice, I have quit because of various reasons…but mostly because of black and female “supervisors” doing no work, then acting like tyrants while still doing no work.
The woman who books the lawyers is Jewish. She knows I am somewhat Jewish. It’s the name. We both look White.
Even though I have flamboyantly quit in a huff, she has faithfully sent me other job opportunities and recently, I took one. She will put thousands of dollars in my pocket while I sit on the couch or the recliner, and review evidence. It’s not that hard. But the money adds up.
I look White, unless people know that certain names are Jewish. So, most Whites think I am “White.”
One of them right? I don’t look Jewish. I don’t talk about Jews. I pass for “White”.
Has one of those milquetoast, spineless, money grubbing, snobbish, judgmental Whites ever lifted a finger to help me? Even if I have helped them, listened to their boring stories, got their spoiled children out of trouble with the law?
What do you think?
Perhaps I am naive, but to my understanding, there’s only one race: the human race. I believe a far more honest and useful approach would be to realize and accept that the human race has breeds (as is observed in many other animals) with identifiable differences between them.
Some whites do this and some whites do that?
“Perhaps I am naive, but to my understanding, there’s only one race: the human race. I believe a far more honest and useful approach would be to realize and accept that the human race has breeds (as is observed in many other animals) with identifiable differences between them. “
Perhaps I am naive, but to my understanding, there’s only one breed: the human breed. I believe a far more honest and useful approach would be to realize and accept that the human breed has families (as is observed in many other animals) with identifiable differences between them.
Why
?
If racial disparities are explained by institutionalized racism, what explains the NFL and the NBA being overwhelmingly black? Or the MLB nowadays being overwhelmingly Hispanic? Why are there no laws to ensure a more diverse football team?
Or some of the white people are not supporters of white people?
I think it’s been one of the biggest complaints on the alt-right (or whatever you want to call it) that Whites exhibit a lower degree of racial solidarity than other races generally, putting their faith instead in ‘meritocracy’ (which has historically often been a cover for a Jewish nepotism). White Gentiles, it seems, are somewhat more naive and trusting than other races, and also exhibit less in-group loyalty, too. To be sure, that problem could be solved through proper social conditioning, but how do we get there from here?
Did they pay you for your legal services? Or, were your fees covered by government subsidies? Is this Jewish woman, who assigns cases, a Public Defender?
With the limited information provided by you, I find it hard to believe that these people you assisted were in position to help you with anything, as most people who have adequate resources can find their own legal representation, rather than having their cases assigned legal representation by some organization.
Some of the white people are Useful Idiots, like Robinette Biden, Lindsay Graham, Mitch McConnell, etc., and some have been spoon-fed the narrative that Europa owes something to the rest of the world.
The pro-Zionist branch of Christianity, wherein Jesus was a Jew, and we are all brothers-in-Christ, is problematic, as well.
There’s no such as a white race. There’s only culture
Race as a social construct was invented by colonial invaders of the Africa’s and South East Asia 200 hundred years ago.
That what doesn’t exist cannot be destroyed.
IQ is also total bullshit. It all depends on how a person was educated during his youth.
If your mama and papa are drugs selling and using homeboys offcourse you is gonna be dumb.
IQ is also a social construct.
Education and ethics define IQ
Color blind meritocracy ended in 1968. Two Supreme Court rulings upheld affirmative action discrimination against Whites.,
California’s prop 209 a few college admissions Supreme Court rulings against affirmative action discrimination were never enforced and never will be.
Those White clients paid you didn’t they? That’s doing something for you isn’t it? And just hiring you rather than another lawyer helped you didn’t it? Your clients support you. That’s doing something for you. They could be supporting another lawyer.
Equal protection under the law ended in 1968 when White men not women and minorities passed the federal action act.
This should scare the shit out of normal people
These universities should get a total blockade just as Israel is getting in the blockade
Get these fuckers out of power
That’s what I was thinking.
Affirmative action protects Jewish standings.
The crux is not only white persecution but Asian supression to keep Jews in the top percentile.
They have crushed entrance to Asians because they kick everyone else’s asses including ours.
A meritocracy would reveal how low Jews find hemselves in the standings and that can’t happen.
Jews often tend to find facts after the fact. They pull out the swords 0f plagerism/ sexual deviance/ anti-semitism etc. to murder them professionally.
My immediate thought was they feared to fire too many ‘anti-semitic’ goys from top spots because it would have a bad look.
Not saying that the plagerism did not happen but I do not trust a single syllable from the Chosen or their toadies.
Time to end affirmative action.
Blind Meriticracy for all right to the top of the dung heep.
Unable to agree/comment because I have not posted 5 comment minimum in the last 30 days
Shame because my comment would solve all the worlds problems
I don’t have much faith in the White race. And I pay attention.
How do we get there?
Ruthless cohesion. Fight anti White discrimination in court. Look out for each other above all other races, to the point of shocking the conscience. Cut off all money, that you can control, to any black or brown person, in any settings.
Our biggest enemies are: cops, the military, bureaucrats and the Catholic Church (the largest importer of Third World trash), as Roatan Bill explains so well about the “Government”.
Poor whites are pitiful. They are the low hanging fruits that cops and the military smash and kill- ruin their lives. We, the middle class Whites, need to protect and help them.
It’s a multi -million dollar private e-Discovery firm. Nothing to do with the Government.
I am not sure what you are talking about?
I am talking about White judges, lawyers, real estate agents, doctors, pharmacist- people I have interacted with my whole life. Most are the scum of the earth- they would steal you blind to buy their fat stupid spoiled children a new Ford F150.
Aside from the very small handful of converts, Jews are a discrete biological population. Isaac Herzog is not an Irishman and has no biological relation to Irish people at all.
Researchers have found that the eyes and brain cavities swell during prolonged periods in space. It lends some credence to what we think of as the typical Alien with a large head and oversized eyes, and a smaller body that might come with inaction or underuse from being in the confines of a spacecraft for years. Fun to think about, but these days you can’t really believe anything you see or hear.
Left suppose to be all about justice, the seek for the truth. Is Left synonymous of justice???
Most self declared leftists are exactly like transgender folks, their gender is “identifying as morally righteous and intellectually superior”. That’s why most them find easy believe in self identifications…
Color blind meritocracy will mean, in practice, Chinese and Hindus and Jews running the country, because they will always choose their own kind while only Whites will swallow colorblindness.
-Discard
Several discrete populations. Something other than biology unites them.
Learn to write ✍️ then argue your point nigga.
Yeah that mousey lil dindoo shouldnt have been in charge of Harvard but amerikkkan society is chock full of incompetent yts that yall give a pass…
I do not understand why the “Diversity, equity and Inclusion” (DEI) get away with their extreme hypocrisy. The #1 Objective of DEI is to EXCLUDE Whites from Jobs and in Education. No one is more Hateful and Intolerant than the DEI crowd. In addition the DEI crowd is very intolerant and NON inclusive about those who disagree with the DEI and its Racist Agenda.
Those niggers don’t count and everyone knows it. Stop with this nonsense. Nigger jews are as jewish as nigger English are English. Their weird little cargo cult is evidence of niggers desperately mimicking any other race, wishing against hope to be anything but black.
If you think Whites are dishonest, just wait until you have to deal exclusively with non Whites.
Academia started going to pot when it embraced faith-blindness. Seven of the Ivies began as seminaries. The great universities of Europe are the creation of monks. Perhaps the solution is not getting off our knees, but getting on them for a change.
How would Hindus and Jews and pagan Chinese fare under the rules before 1866, when…
My college still had a chapel attendance requirement on the books when I attended in the 1980s, though enforcement had subsided somewhat. Unsurprisingly, the student body was around 97% white.
Neither faith-blind meritocracy nor faith-blind identity will defeat wokeism, either. Look at all the sucking-up to Mohammedans at this site of late
Asians are over represented as a portion of the population vs. their share of the college spots. If gooks value education so much, why can’t they build enough universities for their bugmen?
It’s only anti White. Bringing Asians into it is just an anti White deflection. They deserve ZERO spots in our schools.
The left is about using “justice” (lawfare, jurisprudence, the government, the state etc) to enrich themselves/get ahead at others expence.
Mizrahim and Sephardim are black? Well, Palestinians are, so why not? Wogs begin at Calais. Calais, Maine.
Isn’t it the opposite, they stand by the traitors among whites, no matter what?
Was/is it not some of the white people (jew/non-jew) who broght/bring non-Whites into white society?
The West in a nutshell. Jews use blacks and diversity against whites, and whites suck up to Jews.
Any surprise that whites are losing?
Video Link
For a group to survive, it must be allowed to exclude others. That is the beginning and end of civilizational ethics. Anybody who undermines that effort needs to be made a pariah.
blind meritocracy means we all compete and the best brain wins
anything else is tantamount to jewish supremacy dictating who can enter as compensation for their own itellectual inferiority
Perhaps if there were not so many ‘others’ entering the country that would level the playing field for the domestic population.
stop bringing foreign students would be a better approach.
sorry your gook comment threw me off lol
the proliferation of soft sciences at the university level started with the cash cow of guaranteed student loans.
HR and theatre arts produce a society of indebted uneducated McDonalds workers.
Even nursing and teachers received a two year program after high school 40 years ago.
These courses were taught for a fraction of the cost at public colleges.
Wealthy Chinese send their kids here, not because our schools are superior (with the exception of 3 Ivy League institutions) but because space is limited in China for post secondary ed.
Only top students regarless of financial ability gain entry.
In state and provincial facilities we are getting second tier Chinese who still rank in the top 1 percentile of our schools.
This has made it obvious that american/canadian education at the public school level is wanting.
You want a meritocracy… fix that
Universities charge 3 times the tuition to foreign students which has become a highly addictive pattern.
Foereign students should be severely limited but the Jewish universities cannot resist the cash flow.
How is it that a ‘competency crisis’ does not arise when Jews use their nepotistic drive and power too insert their fellows into the heights of power (see the Bidet Administration and Ivy League colleges)when strict competency requirements would see them much less omnipresent? Or is it right there in front of us, but none dare point it out?
“Mizrahim and Sephardim are black?”
Well, the jew is a kind of nigger. In both their cases their behavior is inescapable and comes from their biology. I don’t know what if any alleles code for it. I just recognize they are as consistent in their behavior as any species from the animal kingdom. It manifests without “nurture” and when in large groups is reaches critical mass.
What the fuck does that have to do with anything? You want to set up shop in Reykjavik or in Lagos?
“Woke” is a racist, pre-genocidal movement, saturated in hate, intolerance, censorship of dissent, and Maoist tactics. People should be shocked and offended.
And the idea that both Republicans and Democrats respect the principles of MLK Jr. is a joke. MLK Jr., unlike both sides of the MICIMATT Uniparty, was opposed to illegal foreign wars of conquest, plunder and chaos.
Valuable article, appreciate the topic getting so much sunlight in the alt media of late. ☮️♥️✝️
You’ve hit the nail right on the head. Why do you think the Zionazis HATE the Chinese so profoundly? Because they fear them. They do not fear ‘persecution’, but fear that the Chinese will simply treat them as fellow human beings, not ‘God’s Chosen People’, and not grovel at their feet.
Not really. The different Jewish populations are not discrete, but form a continuum, and are more closely related to each other than any are to their host nations.
Here is my awokening. I conducted business all over the world sometime ago. The worst, most swarmy, devious non payer liars were from India, Africa, most of the Middle East. The best were Europeans, and Chinese. Whites should stick with and support whites and if you have to make stuff talk to the Chinese.
Judaism is most certainly an ethnicity—why else have Jews throughout history expected another Jew to have a Jewish mother?—and you are certainly a hasbara pusher.
The jury is still deliberating.
So why are you still jogging in place?
I must add…
to prohibit superior minds would create an inferior graduate unable to compete on the global stage.
The answer lies in self-improvement.
Instead of barring them…. beat them.
Trashing soft science student loans would be a strategic beginning.
Increase hard science studies at the public school level and raise the bar.
My years working at an Ivy League institution gave me a bird’s eye-view of metriculating students.
In the 70s-90s kids arrived as young adults ready to take on resposibilities
By the 2000s young adults entering had the maturity of 12-year-olds.
Most could not drive, organize time or focus on in depth material.
Any affront to their preconceived notions resulted in hysteria and presented a lack of emotional intelligence.
The on-campus mental health unit went from a small office operating from 8-4pm with one psychologist to an entire hospital open 24 hours.
my 2 cents…
the destruction of the family unit that put women to work, leaving kids to their own devices and mothers too tired to do the hard and important work of raising a family.
many other beefs with feminism that aided in the ruination of the west but inmho this was the break up point.
btw… I am a woman. Mom’s kick ass.
McMaster University
These self-identified leftists, yes they do.
I generally agree with your analysis.
Private education institutions are a business. They are there for the money, so I understand they go after the money at every opportunity. There should be no such thing as a ‘student loan’, especially one backed up by gov’t largess. It’s the availability of (((finance))) that has allowed these businesses to continually raise rates and invent new courses for the terminally stupid to major in.
As long as financing is available, the problem will continue because the kids haven’t the sense to see it’s a scam and their parents don’t want a war on their hands should they object to some basket weaving curriculum. End result is kids wasting several years going into debt with the (((bankers))) while making the businesses rich ultimately at public expense when all the defaults roll in.
The entire finance and banking industry needs to be overhauled from top to bottom. There should be no such thing as a derivative. There should be no such thing as gov’t script aka currency. The entire world needs to go back to honest money that by its inherent scarcity will prevent the misuse of what exists. As long as some fool like Powell can invent what the rubes consider ‘money’ by hitting a few keys on a keyboard, there is no solution possible.
Thank you for your response.
You said it better than I
So the differences between Jonathan Greenblatt and Ron Unz are only on the surface?
Whitey will get bugger all sympathising with Jews over student Antisemitic activism inspired by the Firebombing of Gaza.
This is not the opportunity you were waiting for oh white man.
Thanks for posting.
Well, if you’re involved in Discovery, there’s litigation, or pending litigation, somewhere. And, if you’re hired and paid for your services by a third-party records business, who are the White milquetoasts you’re complaining/telling on?
I am not sure what you’re talking about.
That’s strange, as I have interacted with primarily White judges, lawyers, real estate agents, doctors, and a few Mestizo, and the Whites were far more competent. Maybe it’s you?
Agree. I remember seeing a documentary some years ago on YouTube. Wish I could remember the title because it was quite interesting. It was historical in nature with a bit of sociology mixed in. Somewhere in the mix, it was pointed out how immigrants such as Italians for example, tended to stick to and rely on family and themselves to solve problems in their neighborhoods whereas people of Germanic descent tended toward relying on “law” and “authority”. I remember a whole host of thoughts and images went through my mind hearing that including how the Italians formed Cosa Nostra in the US which in my mind is related to the aforementioned tendency toward relying on themselves and family, criminal or not. Germanic peoples including Scandinavians didn’t go that route. Sounds good on the surface, the problem comes in when it comes time as a people to organize within and among yourselves, and at times potentially, have to learn to operate outside the law especially once it has become a weapon used against you by tyrants. People of Germanic descent would seem, at least on the surface, to be at a real loss when it comes to this type of thinking. Add to that, as you mentioned, their low level of solidarity, and I see a bleak picture ahead. Possibly even fatal. It’s all good and well to sit back and clamor over people we deem to be criminals or criminally minded, but there is another way of looking at it that ought to be considered and that is how to be a survivor and at some point thrive again. I don’t see that happening frankly with as lame as most white people who I know personally are who knows. I more often than not, avoid speaking in those terms but that’s my honest gut sense of it. I also find a lot of what I consider to be over intellectualizing to be counterproductive. We are no longer men of action but rather men of letters so to speak who know how to think, and talk, and think and think, and talk….
I don’t know if anyone else saw the interview Judge Napolitano did today with this Lt. Col Matt Lohmeier. He was talking about the serious issues with the Woke/DEI thing going on in the US military. Sounds good eh. Someone in the military who speaks out against it. Trouble is, then I see this snippet Napolitano posted later, after the interview. Lohmeier, in my mind for all intents and purposes, blew his entire argument against Woke/DEI with his lame comments about his black buddy and the great tranny soldier he encountered. As soon as I heard this, my reaction was that this guy is a plant. He’s not legit. He is trying to actually SAVE some watered down form of Woke/DEI in the US military. I don’t trust this guy one bit –
Video Link
Indeed, the computer study that backed up the winning lawsuit against Harvard at SCOTUS found that Jews were 500% overrepresented at Harvard, based on scores and academic records, almost as much as blacks and hispanics…
Video Link
“””This gap is about 15 points between Blacks and Whites in the United States, for example. If such a gap exists, there is nothing alarming about a significant gap in representation in the education system.”””
—————————————————————–
If the media says the b/w IQ gap is 15 points, that means it’s really 35 points.
The author of this article is a fool for blindly accepting the “official story” on this subject. These are the same people who tell us men can get pregnant and math is racist.
Why should whites fight for colorblindness when non-whites don’t ? They say give my group more and hell with everyone else. They are openly racist and whites should be likewise.
Anti-white affirmative action has been part of america for 60 years. We have been persecuted that long and we are the ones who should be demanding special favors to make up for that.
Not sure what it is you’re attempting to inform me of there LFC. I am aware of “Irresistible Revolution” and I could add some of my own personal awareness of the US “Space Force” because I have a young family member who serves in it. You responded to my comments about Lohmeier so tell me something of your own opinion.
Sheeeeeeeiiiiit
More or less true.
YES!
I think the real answer is that everyone knows whether they are ‘white’ or not. Of European descent or not. Statements like this –
“The easiest way to visualise this is to look at scatter plots generated from the application of principal component analysis (PCA) to human genetic clusters. This is a statistical procedure that allows us to identify and visualise patterns of variability within a large dataset on a simple two dimensional graph.”
…will do nothing to awaken white European people to the danger we are in. No need to complicate it with graphs, statistics, etc. The over-intellectualizing of this issue I mentioned in an earlier comment applies.
Use a Negro as detector of white people.
When a Negro hollers, “where da white women at?”, dey’s know what dey be talking about.
Is IQ hardware or software or some mix? If you can’t answer that beyond any real doubts then you better send your brain to a holiday!
Pushing the feeble lie that Soros is some sort of nazi?
Verdict: (((troll))).
Go on then, no one is stopping you.
Tower 22 is Dead Nigger Storage.
As I thought. Sicilians are the gateway mongrels to WOGlandia!
“ So the differences between Jonathan Greenblatt and Ron Unz are only on the surface?”
Yes, you moron. Biology exists. You are not different from whatever ethnic group you come from in any meaningful way. Grow the fuck up and abandon the socially engineered retardation you got from too much TV.
Another great article by Keith Woods.
Jews are not wrong when they say culture is important. That’s they have won. They desconstructed all of European-derived culture and the core of their Matrix has been Anglo nations.
Is there anything more debased that an obsession with one’s ancestry? Not too far back, we were all running around the African savanna, trying to avoid being eaten. Further back, we were amoebae, bumping into each other. In fact, I’ll have you know that my amoeba ancestors were much smarter, and better-looking, than yours. Bigger flagella, too.
I visited a local winery a few years ago. Owner was pulling all the white varieties, to plant red, because the Chinese prefer red. They were his best customers, and, he said, absolutely trustworthy. A hand-shake was enough, but there was paper-work, too.
Americans, on the other hand…. He’d stopped exporting to the USA. Too much legal clap-trap and chicanery.
If you are correct, then the two men are on the same side, with the same aim– they have the same biology, so they have the same thought processes. Which means that one of the two must be a fraud. Or both. Tell us which.
Our subcontinental commenter Thomm insists that this site is “controlled opposition”. Even possibly an ADL project itself. Are you part of this, too?
And use your adult language?
I gave up TV around 1977. Were you even born yet?
So when I’m arrested with a concealed pistol on the streets of Liverpool or Cologne, I should call on you as my lawyer?
Serbs and Croats, Ulstermen and Irish, Flemings and Dutch and Afrikaners might take a different view of “meaningful”.
Welfare (much more than racial characteristics).
Causes White fatherlessness, too (which is extensive and growing).
So, what country is “local” to you?
How do biologists differentiate between species that look similar but are in fact distinct? Their behavior. Biology is inescapable. Even this wretched “individualism” that is presently killing White people.
Keith “Captain Obvious” Woods
In his introduction to Stoddard’s Rising Tide, Madison Grant clues us in on your own race:
Hey, that’s great you had to change the subject with what you think is some anti White literature. From Madison Grant no less! He’s like a racists racist according to you anti White mongrels.
Biology is real. Thanks for straining your brain so hard and failing to refute the obvious.
I’m not denying biology. But if biology is the only factor, then Ron Unz and Jonathan Greenblatt must agree, as they have the same genes. All beagles bark the same, and all Cavendish bananas taste the same.
Then the question is, why are you on this site at all? You must be with Greenblatt.
Mea culpa. English, Scottish, Irish, German, Dutch, French. Throw in several Scandinavian tribes, and my kids are even more mixed!
Grant himself was “anti-White”, as he accepted the western Alpines but rejected the eastern ones. He recognized the inherent divisions within the Caucasian population, and even within his branch, whose internecine wars he decried. But, hey, that’s their biology.
Other races can unite because they are clones. That’s why Mao and Chiang could fight side-by-side for decades, and our blacks rioted in the streets to protest the prosecution of Bill Cosby. And Jonathan Greenblatt and Ron Unz work for the same goal.
Biology is absolute!
Animals with the same biology fight all the time. You are really upset that biology dictates behavior.
Yes, Ron Unz and Jonathan Greenblatt are both jews who act like jews.
But you can try to find some sniveling quote to call me a nigger again.
I though Caesar was a med? You’re saying that online handles don’t identify a persons race?
Colorblind meritocracy ended in America between March 6 1961 and 1971 Griggs. One presidential executive order one federal law and one Supreme Court decision, It’s 2024 not 1964 when affirmative action could still be debated The debate was won by Jews and non Whites in 1961 1968 and 1971
What’s next an article about the pros and cons of legalizing sodomy?
Keith Woods is 63 years too late.
The Iranians don’t likeKeith Woods or any White Americans or Europeans any more than Jews and Israelis do. If he wants to make friends with Iranians he should move to Los Angeles. Muslims in the valley. Jews and Zoroastrians in Malibu and Beverly Hills and Christians scattered all over. I’ll introduce him around.,Plenty in N California too.
It’s been 6 months now. If Muslim countries wanted to help the Muslim Arabs in Palestine they would have. They haven’t.
Don’t listen to what Muslim countries say about Gaza. Look at what Muslim countries do about Gaza.
Which is absolutely nothing nothing nothing nothing,
The author believes it’s the summer of 1968 when the federal affirmative action law was being passed in congress.. sometimes this site is Rip Van Winkle or time travel.
Color blind meritocracy ended for federal employees federal contractors and any and all city county and state government agencies that received federal money on March 6 1961 what Jewish puppet President John Fitzgerald Kennedy joyously signed the affirmative action Executive Order 10925.
1961 EO 10925
1964 civil rights for all but Whites act federal law
1968 Affirmative action act
1970? president Executive Order affirmative action for Hispanics Done on orders of Ford Foundation
1971 Griggs vs Duke Power Supreme Court orders that the dumbest totally unqualified incompetent black SHALL be hired instead of the most qualified White. “ Disproportionate representation is of and in itself clear and present evidence of discrimination “
Color blind meritocracy ended in America March 6 1961. 63 years ago.
California Prop 209 referendum to end affirmative action passed with a large majority in 1996. Upheld by the courts in 1998. Never enforced at all completely ignored
The recent Asian students vs Harvard there was an anti affirmative action decision upheld by the Supreme Court. Harvard admissions refused to abide by the decision and there is no way to enforce it.
Totally irrelevant article about affirmative action and racial discrimination against Whites.
The Alps are in far North Italy Austria Switzerland eastern France and Germany. Did Stoddard not have access to a map of Europe? Why did he claim East Europeans are Alpines when they are hundreds of miles east and north of the Alps. Maybe he was thinking of the Carparthians it Transylvanian mountains?
If Stoddard had looked at a map of Europe He would have known the people of the wedge from Asia thrusting into Europe is Poles and Czechs some of the blondest and bluest and tallest of Europeans . Try and find a short dark Pole or Czech
That picture he put in his book of the ideal Nordic was Henry 5 King of England
Stoddard obviously never looked at a map of Europe or knew who the ideal Nordic man he put in his book was