RSS
The three white men convicted of murdering Ahmaud Arbery filed appeals on March 3, 2023. The men are trying to overturn only their convictions — and life sentences — for federal hate crimes, not the life sentences they received for murder under state law. Ironically, they are appealing the very same judge who forced them to go to trial in federal court and who handed down longer-than-life sentences.
Lawyer A.J. Balbo wrote the appeal for Gregory McMichael, the retired law enforcement official who decided to chase Arbery after recognizing the 25-year-old black man as a trespasser who had been caught on a neighbor’s home-security camera many times. Mr. McMichael was standing in the back of a truck and was on the phone with 911 when his son, Travis McMichael, fatally shot Arbery.
The appeal says the prosecution charged Greg McMichael with:
Interference of Rights: “for allegedly using force and threats of force to intimidate and interfere with Mr. Arbery because he was on a public street and because of his race.”
Attempted Kidnapping: “for allegedly attempting to seize or confine Mr. Arbery and hold him for reward or benefit.”
A Firearms Offense: for “carrying, using or brandishing a firearm in connection with . . . the interference of rights.”
The appeal includes a summary of the incident, explaining that “Mr. Arbery inexplicably turned toward Travis McMichael” who “fired the shotgun three times, killing Mr. Arbery.” The summary does not mention that Arbery had grabbed Travis’s gun and that the two men were fighting for control of the weapon when Travis pulled the trigger.
The appeal points out that “despite three decades in law enforcement, no evidence was presented at trial showing that Greg McMichael had ever been the subject of any formal complaint involving excessive force or racially insensitive conduct.”
A police officer — who responded to calls about a trespasser on a property near the McMichael’s home — had shown the home security footage to both Greg and Travis, and the appeal mentions that while they discussed how to identify the trespasser, Greg “never uttered any racial epithet about Mr. Arbery or expressed any racial animus.”
The argument against the Interference-of-Rights conviction is that “the Government failed to present sufficient evidence that Gregory McMichael acted because of Mr. Arbery’s race, and because Mr. Arbery was using a public facility.”
The Government had to prove that the offense would not have occurred “but-for” the fact that Arbery was black. Mr. Balbo argues that race was not “the straw that broke the camel’s back” in Greg’s decision to pursue Arbery. The appeal states that Greg knew Arbery had entered his neighbor’s property four times without permission. “Arbery’s race was only relevant because it matched the race of the man on the home security footage . . . [and] had Gregory McMichael seen a black female running past his house on that fateful day . . . he would not have left his driveway.”
The Government also had to prove that Greg McMichael “acted ‘because of’ Mr. Arbery’s enjoyment of a public facility.” In this case, the “public facility” was the road Arbery ran on. The appeal argues that Greg would have pursued Arbery even if he had run across people’s front lawns rather than staying on the road. It also mentions that the Government provided no evidence that Greg “ever expressed an opinion that people of color should not be permitted to use public facilities, including the streets of his neighborhood.” A witness in the trial testified that Greg had rented a home to African Americans. If he would let them live on property he owned, why wouldn’t he let them use a public street?
Mr. Balbo acknowledges that the same witness testified that Greg referred to a black tenant as a “walrus,” and that after the tenant failed to pay the rent, Greg turned off her air conditioning. Later, he said, “You should have seen how fast her big fat black ass came with the rent check.” The appeal states the comments “paint Gregory McMichael in a negative light,” but don’t prove he believed black people should not use public streets. The appeal also tries to show that Greg demonstrated the least bias against blacks of the three defendants, noting that unlike his son and William Bryan (who recorded the video of the incident), Greg never “uttered the ‘n-word’ or other racial epithets.”
The appeal also states that the prosecution failed to prove that Greg “associated African Americans with criminality.”
The appeal concedes that Greg reacted to the death of civil rights activist Julian Bond by saying, “all these [B]lacks are nothing but trouble; I wish they would all die.” Mr. Balbo countered that this was five years before the incident with Arbery. The capital letter B is in brackets in the appeal. Greg McMichael must have written a lowercase B, and his lawyer made the change.
Arguing against the Attempted Kidnapping charge, Greg’s lawyer wrote that the Government failed to prove that the truck the McMichaels used to follow Arbery was being used as an “instrument of interstate commerce.” The appeal states that the truck was used as “nothing more than a makeshift barricade.” Another argument is that the government failed to prove Greg attempted to kidnap Arbery for “ransom or reward or otherwise.” The prosecution had made a case that a feeling of vigilantism is its own reward.
Greg McMichael’s appeal also argues that the residential streets where this event took place were not even a “public facility,” as the law requires for an Interference-With-Rights conviction.
Lawyer Amy Lee Copeland made the same argument at length in her appeal for Greg’s son, Travis McMichael. In her 81-page brief, she cited documents from 1958, when the developers who built the neighborhood tried officially to turn over the streets to Glynn County, a process known as “dedication.” Minutes from a Glynn County Commission meeting held 65 years ago show that Glynn County did not accept responsibility for the streets. Nor did the Government introduce evidence during the trial proving that Glynn County accepted dedication at a later date. Instead, the Government cited “service tickets” to show that the county had done maintenance in the neighborhood, such as mosquito control, storm-debris cleanup and drainage.
The appeal is filled with case law intended to prove that the streets were not public, even though the county did maintenance. Miss Copeland wrote, “While the county expressly rejected the offered dedication of the streets of Satilla Shores, it accepted the ‘elevation and drainage of the area involved.’ . . . A county can accept part of a dedication and reject another part.” There was evidence at trial that the developer paved the streets, but none to show that the county had since repaved them.
Travis’s lawyer also said that the court “abused its discretion” when it allowed the prosecution to use as evidence Facebook posts of Satilla Shores residents discussing “privatizing the streets.” The posts were meant to prove that the streets were public, but Miss Copeland pointed out that the social media posts were hearsay, and “offered legal advice that the unidentified neighbors were not competent to give.”
The appeal says nothing about Travis McMichael’s reportedly frequent use of racial slurs or any views he may have had about blacks. It refers to racial hatred only in connection with a precedent Miss Copeland cites about a clash between black marchers and members of the Ku Klux Klan during a parade, but this was only to support her argument that the Satilla Shores streets are not a public facility.
Miss Copeland also capitalizes “black” but leaves “white” in lowercase. The Associated Press adopted this style because “capitalizing the term [white] could pull white people more fully into issues and discussions of race and equality.” Presumably, that would not be desirable. Now many journalists follow this rule, and apparently lawyers writing briefs in federal cases also use deferential capitalization.
Although not mentioned in his father’s appeal, Travis’s appeal does note that “Arbery tried to grab Travis’ shotgun; there was a struggle; and Travis shot and killed Arbery, delivering wounds consistent with grabbing a shotgun.” The second D.A. to work on this case (the first recused herself because she knew Greg McMichael) decided not to prosecute because he thought Travis’ actions were “justifiable homicide.” It was not until William Bryan’s video was released and public pressure began to mount that the three men were charged.
The appeal also asserts that “the government did not prove that the truck was being used as an instrumentality of interstate commerce in the commission of a crime.” She argued that when the truck was used to block Arbery’s path, it was parked and there was no one behind the wheel.
William Bryan’s appeal, written by attorney J. Pete Theodocion, summarizes the incident, saying that Mr. Bryan, a 50-year-old small-engine repairman, was doing work on his porch when he saw Arbery being chased by a truck he recognized from his neighborhood. He heard one of the McMichaels yelling for Arbery to stop running, but Arbery continued. “Feeling like Arbery may have committed a crime to warrant such a chase, Bryan got into his truck unarmed and joined in the pursuit. . . . During the chase, Bryan at one point blocked Arbery’s path, forcing him briefly off the road.” Later, Mr. Bryan’s truck was directly behind Arbery, but he did not accelerate or try to hit him. Arbery made contact with the truck at one point, leaving a palm print on it, “after making a punching motion at the vehicle.” Mr. Bryan temporarily lost contact with Arbery, but later approached him from the rear as Arbery was confronted by the McMichaels. He captured on video Travis McMichael fatally shooting Arbery, and he turned the video over to police at the scene.
The appeal states that “years of telephone and internet activity [by Mr. Bryan] were reviewed and analyzed.” Mr. Bryan voluntarily turned over his phone and passwords. The analysis was performed by Amy Vaughan, an intelligence analyst for the FBI Counterterrorism Division. Miss Vaughan testified at trial that Mr. Bryan had “general racial animus against African Americans” and “associated African Americans with criminality.”
Mr. Bryan did not approve of his daughter dating a black man. In February 2020, he sent a text to his sister, telling her that his daughter “has her a ni**er now.” He later joked with his ex-wife that the boyfriend would “fit right in with the monkeys.” When the ex-wife sent him a screenshot of the young couple months later, Mr. Bryan replied, “Like I said she don’t give a fuck about herself why should we” and “I don’t see any way anything good can come to her with the life she is leading.”
In 2019 and 2020, Mr. Bryan referred to Martin Luther King Jr. Day as “Bootlip Day,” and described the celebration as a “monkey parade.” He complained that he “worked like a ni**er today” so “all the ni**ers can take off.” He also referred to blacks as “boots.” He said of a young woman that she was “still without the one ni**er but probably has another ni**er!”
Mr. Bryan’s lawyer argues that, in spite of these words, “there was no evidence presented at trial that prior to February 23, 2020, Bryan had ever done harm to an African American or any minority. . . . No evidence was presented that Bryan had ever a contentious moment with a black individual throughout his lifetime.”
To prove Mr. Bryan associated blacks with criminality, Miss Vaughan provided a 2016 Facebook post mentioning that a stolen bicycle had been recovered and a suspect was caught, and Mr. Bryan commented, “What kind of fine upstanding citizen was it? My money still on bootlip.” The appeal does not mention whether the culprit was black.
In May 2019, a friend texted Mr. Bryan that his wife had medical expenses she could not pay, and Mr. Bryan responded, “If you were black you would not pay for it!” He recommended that his friend “try and get her on disability like the ni**ers that don’t need it.”
Mr. Theodocion argued in the appeal that “There was no evidence presented that Mr. Bryan intended to deprive Arbery of his right to use a public roadway, and none that he acted with conscious intent because of Arbery’s race or color.” He also wrote that no evidence was presented to prove Mr. Bryan had anything to gain by kidnapping Arbery. “When explosively prejudicial evidence of racism is introduced,” Mr. Theodocion wrote — Mr. Bryan’s words were apparently “explosively prejudicial” — “verdicts not supported by sufficient evidence can be a natural consequence, and Bryan asks this Court to overturn what are two plainly improper and unsupported verdicts.”
Mr. Theodocion wrote that evidence of racial bias is usually strictly forbidden in trials as evidence of a defendant’s character, and he cited a case that declared such “unfair prejudice” lures the jury into declaring guilt “on a ground different from proof specific to the offense charged.” He mentioned that three of the jurors were black and one was Hispanic, and said that they “were asked to judge Bryan’s fate” after hearing about “expressions of racism” from the McMichaels and after seeing Mr. Bryan’s “own usage of foul and ugly racist terms.” He went on to explain: “Bryan’s use of the word ‘ni**er’ (on seven occasions), ‘bootlip’ (twice) and ‘monkey’ (twice) over at least a five-year span, while nothing to be proud of, fall far short of evidence from which a jury could determine he acted ‘because of race’ when he joined the pursuit of Ahmad [sic] Arbery.”
The lawyer compared William Bryan to Travis McMichael, claiming that Travis was “obsessed with African Americans” while Mr. Bryan was not. Unlike Travis, Mr. Bryan had “never called for violence against African Americans or any minority.” Mr. Bryan’s texts and social media showed that he “used the ‘n word’ barely once a year.”
Mr. Theodocion added, “The Government presented no evidence that Bryan possessed or shared any racist literature, no evidence that he approved of any movements related to White Nationalism . . . and no evidence that he had ever been rude, mean or harmful to an African American at any point in his life.”
The prosecution had argued in its opening statement that Bryan, “immediately assumed that the black guy . . . had to be a criminal and that the people chasing him . . . had to be the good guys.” The prosecution added that “in his mind Bryan was doing the right thing — aiding in . . . capturing a possible criminal,” but he committed a crime because he joined the pursuit “due to a subconscious determination” that the McMichaels had noble intentions.
The appeal states that the prosecution acknowledged during the trial that it “was in possession of no evidence Bryan consciously intended to harm Arbery because of his race,” but “the Government repeatedly assured the jury such evidence was not necessary, and that it was Bryan’s subconscious decision-making that led to his actions.”
“There is simply not sufficient evidence,” says the appeal, “to suggest Bryan would have acted any differently on the day in question had Arbery been white, Hispanic, Asian or other. Every crime committed against an African American is not a hate crime. Every crime committed against an African American by a man who has used racist language in the past is not a hate crime.”
The appeal explains that Arbery never called out for help or gave any signs that he was the victim of an unprovoked attack, and that Mr. Bryan did not arm himself or attempt to strike Arbery with his vehicle. He had only “attempted to get close enough to . . . capture the young man’s face on video to aid in possible identification if needed at a later time.”
Like the appeal for Greg McMichael, Mr. Bryan’s lawyer argued that he shouldn’t be guilty of Interference with Rights because there is no proof that he would not have followed and recorded video had Arbery run through private yards instead of staying on the paved road. “The Government has argued that this crime could not have occurred exactly the same had Arbery not been on the roadway, but that is not the same as the crime occurring because of such. At no point did the Government even attempt to suggest that the Defendants were motivated by a desire to prohibit usage of Satilla Shores Drive or any roadway to Arbery.”
The appeal concludes: “Bryan never sought to prevent Arbery specifically from enjoying the roads of the Satilla Shores neighborhood, just as he’d never accosted any of the surely numerous African Americans who had made use of those roads in the past.”
Recall that BLM shut down highways to protest in many cities during 2020, depriving hundreds if not thousands of people of their right to use public roadways, yet no one was charged with federal Hate Crimes. What would their emails and texts reveal about their attitudes towards whites?
This appeal will go before Judge Lisa Godbey Wood, of the federal Southern District of Georgia. She is a white woman appointed by George W. Bush in 2007, after serving three years as US Attorney for the Southern District of Georgia. Judge Wood has already ruled in this case. Last year, she rejected a plea deal the McMichaels had reached with prosecutors in the federal case to accept sentences of 30 years. Why? The New York Times:
In court, the Arbery family objected to the deal at least in part because it would have allowed the McMichaels to serve time in federal prison, which is generally regarded as having better, safer conditions than state prisons. This may be especially true in Georgia, where last fall the Justice Department began an investigation of state prisons, citing a high rate of murder and assault.
Arbery’s mother, Wanda Cooper-Jones said, “I fought so hard to get these guys in the state prison,” she said. “I told them [prosecutors] very, very adamantly that I wanted them to go to state prison and do their time. . . . Then I got up this morning and found out they had accepted this ridiculous plea.” Arbery’s father, Marcus Arbery, said he was “mad as hell” because the plea would have meant 30 years in federal rather than state prison. “We want 100 percent justice,” he said, “not no half justice.”
It is very unusual for a judge to reject a plea deal, but the three men had to go to trial. The defense pointed out that publicity about the rejected deal — which required a guilty plea — could prejudice a jury against the defendants. The jury found all three guilty after deliberating just over three hours. Members of Arbery’s family walked out of the courthouse, arms raised in triumph.
Before sentencing, Amy Copeland, who filed the most recent appeal for Travis McMichael, asked the judge to send her client to federal prison, noting that he had received more than 800 death threats. Some said prisoners are “waiting for him” after his photos circulated via “contraband” social media throughout the heavily-black Georgia state-prison system. Greg McMichael made a similar plea. All three men have been in protective custody since their arrest in May 2020.
Judge Wood then sentenced Travis and Gregory McMichael to second life terms on the federal charges, and for good measure, she added 10 more years to Travis’s sentence and seven more to Greg’s. She sentenced William Bryan to 35 years. Arbery’s mother was present and pronounced herself “very thankful” for the sentence. Travis McMichael’s lawyer Miss Copeland urged again that her client be moved to a federal prison, where he would be safe. “I am concerned, your honor, that my client effectively faces a back door death penalty,” she said, adding that “retribution and revenge” should not be sentencing goals, even for a defendant who is “publicly reviled.” Arbery’s father said he didn’t want the McMichaels in federal prison because they deserved to “rot” in state prison.
Judge Wood will now decide whether to overturn three convictions reached in her own courtroom — convictions that turn on whether Arbery was shot because of his race. When she handed down the sentences, she said, “Ahmaud Arbery will be forever 25. And what happened, a jury found, happened because he’s black.”
Ahmaud Arbery is no longer in the headlines, and some of the national passion about his case may have died down. Still, what judge, especially one who has ruled consistently — some might even say cruelly — against the appellants, will overturn the convictions of “racists,” even if they will die in prison on state charges anyway?
English
Arabic
Chinese (Simplified)
Dutch
French
German
Hebrew
Hindi
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Russian
Spanish
Swedish
Turkish
Vietnamese
black man as a trespasser who had been caught on a neighbor’s home-security camera many times.
uhhh…. appealing the new secular religion is like jacking off… it gives that temporary relief that things should be as they should be… until judged to be the opposite.
…..and, {{{{WHO}}}} owned the Slave Ships….?
and {{{{WHO}}}} insured the Cargo….of the SLAVE SHIPS….?
see: Isaiah 13:14.
“And it shall be as the chased roe, and as a sheep that no man taketh up:
they shall every man turn to his own people, and flee every one into his own land.
Isn’t it incredible the lengths that the states will go to, the money they will spend to turn over every rock in the lives of Whites when an altercation happens involving blacks. But in reversal they’ll quash anything possible to help their pets regardless of what they do, including bond free release in many cities. The career scumbag Arbrey himself is the perfect point. NOTHING of his past and criminal arrest record was admissible, not even the mention that he grabbed the rifle and caused his own demise, even though it was obvious to anyone that can see. There is absolutely no evidence that they ever intended to kill him other than the lies told by the bigoted prosecutors, as they could have shot him at any time leading up to his stupid decision to try and take the gun from the guy that shot him, which had he succeeded would have surely resulted in two deaths, Arbrey and the shooter.
The ridiculously lopsided violent crime stats in this cuntry cannot even be hinted at that any of it could be racially motivated. In my home town, a filthy munt beat two elderly White women unconcious, the entire time screaming for stunned witnesses that “White people need to go.” The slimey DA of Cuyahoga Cunty is “considering” hate crime prosecution on top of the aggravated assault charges. I’d go on about if the races were reversed, but we all know what reality is now for Whites.. We’re on the verge of South Africa status when it comes to justice. And oh by the way, my brother was the arresting officer of this filthy munt, and somehow he made to the holding facility without a scratch… Go figure.
The FBI tracked down Robert Rundo and he’s now in custody in Romania awaiting extradition. His “crime” was travelling to various Trump rallies (along with Charlottesville) to act in defense of the less fit when the inevitable Antifa attacks took place. Of course his real crimes are ideological even though they are protected by the First Amendment.
The case of Amhad Arbery and the three (white) Satilla residents who are presently doing “hard time” for defending themselves is a prime example of prosecutorial misconduct and double jeopardy, which MUST be addressed and outlawed.
Arbery was a criminal POS who was casing construction sites for tools and other materials that he could steal and sell. He was observed at the same site previously on video as well.
As there were break-ins and increased criminal activity, the three men were merely defending their neighborhood.
Arbery refused to be questioned which was within his right.
Arbery felt “disrespected” by being questioned and “doubled back”, attacking the man with the shotgun. Arbery attacked the man by pulling on the barrel of the shotgun causing it to fire. Anyone familiar with firearms knows that pulling on a barrel of a shotgun can cause it to fire. Arbery has that one fatal “flaw” that is present in all black DNA, the misperceived “shame” of being “disrespected” (even if no “disrespect” occurred) and the need to immediately “do something about it” (instant gratification).
Arbery could (and should) have run off in any other direction, would not have been pursued, and would still be alive today. He chose to confront the man with the shotgun. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
The original prosecutor refused to indict. The powers-that-be had to “shop” for a prosecutor who would take the case. It took three tries before they found one who would indict.
This is prosecutorial “double jeopardy” which must be addressed and outlawed nationwide. The way it stands now, what is stopping a prosecutor from one jurisdiction from indicting someone from another jurisdiction when a local prosecutor having legal jurisdiction refuses to indict? We are all in trouble if this is allowed to stand.
Also, the court was stacked against the white men just because they are white.
Arbery’s previous extensive criminal record was not allowed to be disclosed and put into evidence.
So-called “civil-rights icons”, Antifa and BLM types were in the courtroom, threatening violence if the “correct verdict” was not rendered.
The jury was also warned that there would be violence if they did not convict.
The “judge” went along with the threats and refused to run a proper court proceeding. The judge would not allow Arbery’s past extensive criminal record into evidence.
The mainstream media fanned the flames of racial hatred against whites, making Arbery out to be a mere “jogger”, (yeah, right). Who in their right mind jogs 20 miles from home in work boots? The “mainstream media” stated that Arbery “was studying to be an electrician” and was merely observing construction sites…yeah, right. Arbery was looking for copper wire or anything else of value to steal, that being his stock in trade as an “electrician”.
I pray that any appeals that the Satilla three place will be successful.
Their prosecutorial double jeopardy and kangaroo court “trial” were both sh!tshow railroad jobs from the outset.
Better question might be “Can there be justice for White people”?
For an easy example, no possible way Trump gets any kind of a fair trial (assuming there is one) simply because the jury pool in NYC is 80% anti-Trump.
I guess I would need to read the court transcript from the trial but claiming the truck was an instrument of interstate commerce is totally asinine and false. The McMichaels did not use their truck to black Avery from the video. The parked the truck in the middle of the street and Arbery ran up to the truck took a hard left turn and bull rushed the shotgun carrying Travis McMichael which caused the scuffle. Travis McMichael was forced to shoot Arbery or be shot himself as Arbery attempted to wrest control of the shotgun away from him.
Prior to the incident Travis McMichael was not point the shotgun at Arbery and was carrying it abreast in accordance with Georgia state law. Shotguns can be open carried in Georgia. Travis was not breaking the law in open carrying the shotgun.
The state convicted all three men based on their past statements about blacks and assumed their actions were racially motivated just because of what one or more of them said years prior.
‘ … apparently lawyers writing briefs in federal cases also use deferential capitalization.‘
Presumably in the knowledge that antagonising the court is never a good idea. They cannot be blamed for seeking to defend their clients’ best interests, as irritating as that may sometimes be.
What a nasty, sadistic, narcissistic, virtue signaling cunt. Federal hate crime laws are just a not too clever way for the left to get around the double jeopardy clause in the constitution.
Simple answer- “No”.
I guess we now have to let people steal from our neighborhoods with impunity, and simply do nothing when we catch them in the act. Even just calling 9-11 could be viewed as prejudiced behavior.
If you do accidentally encounter them in the act, you can’t challenge them about it, can’t detain them, and anything you try to do, to capture their identity, i.e. take their photo, is risking a confrontation, whereby you’ll face accusations of prejudice, again.
Not for nothing, but this guy was casing that construction site, repeatedly, looking for stuff to steal. A repeat offender, and you still can’t do anything about it.
Well, at least nothing that involves law enforcement, cops, videos, the light of day, vehicles, shotguns, and 9-11…. so I guess you could still do stuff that includes none of that, and doesn’t include getting caught… I guess that’s the only option available, so I guess, don’t complain when that message sinks in, and it’s dark of night vigilantism.
If the “Law” offers no justice, people will stop trusting the law, and stop using the law, and then, the law will mean nothing.
Travis was the guy with the gun. His father and the guy with the camera did nothing really.
Sorry, I don’t feel any sympathy. Yankees, both white and black . Same pigs cross the oceans to kill millions of innocent people around the world using lies and subterfuge. America is going to hell where it belongs
These poor basterds got screwed by the anti-White mania that is sweeping the country. Total miscarriage of justice for the shooting death of the “jogger “. They were of course stupid for brandishing a gun but their sentences are so extreme they defy all logic.
Judge Wood is a suicidal pathological fool.
And the 9 females on the jury are as well.
I don’t know why but I was under the impression that appeals went to a different judge, I’m pretty ignorant about these things in general but if they knew it’d go back to her then why bother? Of course I could be missing something, this is could be a necessary step to actually appeal to a different court altogether for all I know. If this is their last possible move then it seems like they’re doing the equivalent of asking the fox in charge of guarding the hen house to reconsider it’s position on eating the hens.
One may be a racist, misogynist, Judeophobe, Islamophobe, cynophobe or whatever, until one acts on that hatred in a fashion that harms another. That includes inciting hatred in others. Such antipathies need to be kept to oneself.
Or perhaps Arbery was in fear for his life, confronted by three armed vigilantes, and struggled out of mortal terror.
There may not be ‘justice’, but there will be selective accommodation.
For instance, if the racists are Black activists, there will be talk of mitigating circumstances (poverty), calls for black solidarity, calls to abolish ‘systemic racism’, and ‘demands’ for justice (prison and sentencing reform) by the violent Black mob and the attendant news media.
If the racists are Jewish, there will be lavish aid from Jewish advocacy groups, expressions of sympathy in the news media (including possible references to the Holocaust), along with the ongoing celebration of Jewish survival in the face of Naziism. Never again!
If the racists are [W]hite, there will be angry and intimidating demonstrations by negros and their ‘liberal’ cohorts, protestations about past lynchings (only if the victim was Black), outrage over the (defunct) KKK, slavery (in America only), along with ceaseless demands for reparations, affirmative action, and the swift punishment of all evil [W]hites who are guilty of preferring the company of their own kind.
These double standards are now embedded in American culture.
They assure unequal treatment under law.
This is the unhappy state that we are in.
this sounds and reads like a case of JIm Crow/Snow justice..YOU are WHITE therefore you are racist. …Ironic that the FBI investigator declared that ONE of the defendants associated Blacks with criminal behavior..while the FBI web statistics literally associate blacks with criminality. I saw the video and it was a clear undisputable case of SELF/DEFENSE..
How many times was Arbery shot, two or three times? If it was in a struggle then wouldn’t you expect one shot only to incapacitate him? What kind of shotgun was it, double barrelled or pump action? If the shooter was acting in self defence shouldn’t he have first fired a warning shot in the air when Arbery started to move on him and then in the leg, or just in the leg if Arbery was moving fast on him? The shooter also had the option to move back or to the side and keep his distance while firing warning shots or shooting Arbery in the leg to incapacitate him?
Can ‘racists’ receive ‘justice’ in America today? — I doubt it — e.g. there was no attempt to interfere with the armed intimidation outside the courtroom, and I do not recall seeing it condemned:
Ahmaud Arbery case: Black armed militias gathered outside the courthouse, issue warning
William Luther Pierce talked about this problem two decades ago:
Media-Driven Law
Listen to the audio version here.
That would not be ‘ironic’, it would be disturbing — I don’t see how it could be possible for a court or judge involved in the original trials and convictions to handle any appeal.
Literally unbelievable — there is no reason whatsoever to believe it was anything other than Arbery’s attempt to wrest the gun away that resulted in his death — what was Travis McMichael supposed to do? — let Arbery get control of the weapon and use it on him and the others? — and given that, there is no reason not to appeal the state murder convictions too.
Meet Attorney A.J. Balbo — Former Military Prosecutors with Years of Trial Experience
He advertises his practice as ‘veteran owned’ — like anyone would fucking care — yeah, ‘thanks for your service’.
ITS OVER: Chicago Elects RADICAL BLACK MANIAC To ELIMINATE THE POLICE | America First Ep. 1143
https://rumble.com/v2ghn8k-america-first-ep.-1143.html
Far as everybody has seen online including VIDEO EVIDENCE IT WAS NEVER MURDER = nobody was murdered, & the ‘charges’ R jewey persecution of whites who dare 2 defend themselves, as usual. The blackie was trespassing 2 rob a building site & then some FORMER POLICE OFFICERS chased him down 2 prosecute him, & the blackie attacked them & was shot in self defense. What’s even more funny than all of that is expecting somebody with a name like (((Katz))) 2 ever state the obvious like that =)) Typical (((Unz))) ‘goy test’ = ‘what will the cattle swallow’ test =P
Americans really should use correct English. Look at the logic of the sentence. What you should say is:
“Not every crime committed against an African American is a hate crime.”
Another simple example:
“All that shines isn’t gold.”
Wrong, because gold shines.
They must find a way to commit suicide. A family member should dissolve a large amount of fentanyl in a liquid base and somehow get it in the visitation area and pour it in a Coke.
A normal person cannot imagine the Hellscape of a state prison with any amount of blacks. They also have the double whammy of many black guards.
I tip my hat to their lawyers. They are brave and deserve richness and recognition for taking their cases. I imagine, probably in the next five years , if a white lawyer takes the case of someone accused of harming the holy American black, they will face bar disciplinary measures for defending a racist. Bank seizure? Criminal sanctions? Yes. I believe that is all coming for anyone who bucks the black narrative.
Truly, I am starting to hate the whites who are allowing this to happen in equal portion to the blacks.
Only in America!
Could you imagine an Israeli being charged with “hate crimes” committed against a Palestinian?
I now actively support a whites-only society and work to sabotage or subvert minorities in a pathetic but satisfying reaction to the world around me
God be with these men.
God free these men. 🙏
I don’t believe for one second this will happen, but honestly I wish it would. The stench of rotting munt flesh would be noticed all the way down in Springfield. The truth is already available for anyone paying attention that even with poeleece presence, these people cannot be controlled.
If they were racists they’d not have pursued the Nigger.
They would have simply trailed off the pursuit and muttered “well, there’s another nigger! Let’s go home and put the feet up.”
Iron pyrites, among other minerals, also shines like gold.
Hatred of Whites is encouraged though:
Video Link
“No Country For White Men.”
If you are White, being accused of racism is worse than being accused of murder or rape. You are guilty and you can never be proven innocent. Whites completely mishandled the race issue from the time slavery was ended and this is where it wound up. They never saw how Jews would exploit it.
Arbery shot himself. That is what happens when you attack someone and pull on the shotgun they are holding. There was no murder at all.
No one is asking you for sympathy. The article is about justice. Perhaps you just don’t understand what that is.
Arbery “double-backed” and CONFRONTED the man with the shotgun. He should have run off, but his defective black DNA demanded that he DO SOMETHING as he felt “disrespected”.
Pulling on the barrel of a shotgun WILL cause it to discharge.
Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
Arbery is right where he belongs.
His criminal career is over.
Those cowardly yts better stay in pc if dey know whats good for them. One of my bois on the inside told me that the BGF got bids on the ginger yt. Dat boy gonna get turned out gangam style lol!
Can There Be Justice for “Racists”?
Since the answer is obviously, No!, all the hostile elite and its antiwhite mob have to do is call all whites racist and their coup is complete. But there’s a snake in this garden.
In fact, every Utopia comes with its own snake. And it’s the job of any elite and those they control to explain that snake away. The explanations for the snake are endless, but all unsatisfactory. Because they all start by looking outside of the very belief-system that created the snake in the first place.
Utopias don’t work because they can’t work. And they can’t work because Utopia is an impossibility. And that impossibility can only be discovered by examining, questioning, and analyzing the belief-system that insists that they do work. It’s called feedback.
No explanation, or interpretation, can survive today without it. Censorship doesn’t solve the problems that come with any explanation, they merely conceal them. Not even force can keep an explanation going. It can only kill everyone who doesn’t believe in it, or doesn’t fit in with the believers.
The difference between Utopias of the past and those of today is that today we have more precise knowledge about ourselves than ever before in history. And with the Internet, and not just the Internet, we have instant access to that knowledge (even with censorship). That’s quantty and quality of knowledge. And we need that knowledge to both adapt to the world and make it adapt to us. Otherwise, we’re not going to make it.
The problem is, most people don’t want to know, or, lacking any intellectual humility at all, are so delusional they actually think they already know it all. Nietzsche called this The Death Leap. Today it’s more commonly known as Dunning-Kruger Effect.
Whatever it’s called it’s obviously everywhere. As anyone can see who can bear to look – the consequences are immense – and could prove fatal to our chances of survival, and perhaps those chances aren’t great. It very well may be.
And now we’re back to the hostile elite and the antiwhite mob and their collective and lethal Jonestown-like addiction to mood-altering through self-righteousness by, in part, reducing all of life to an interpretation of Race, and not just Race. An interpretation that they call the truth, as such beliefs are always called.
Of course, in one way, none of this is a first. Human beings have a very bad habit of debasing their intellect by using it to contruct the most outrageous silliness and then using that silliness to justify wholesale slaughter. Although, it has to be said, that one group in particular stands out in this category. They are the only real cancer of the human race (so treason against them is loyalty to humanity).
The difference is, never before in human history has an elite ever been this powerful and this stupid at the same time. They exhausted what intelligence they did have (more like clever and cowardly sneakiness) in the infiltration, subversion, betrayal, destruction and death they needed to acquire power.
But now that they have it, we’re getting The Drastic Dumbing of The Hostile Elite. And the dumber they get, the more hostile they are. As if one were to conceal the other. Problem is, they have their money-grubbing paws on just about all of the human and natural resources anyone else would need to turn the tables on them by kicking them out of, not just one country, but every country, and if possible, the planet.
Until that happy day, should it ever happen (in itself rather doubtful) we would do well to muster the courage to face a very unpleasant fact. The fact that we are in no position to laugh at the dinosaurs for getting themselves extinct. After all, they lasted a lot longer than we have so far.
Maybe the courage needed to face this unpleasant fact will give us the courage to turn the tables on the hostile elite – forever. Either way, their Empire of Insanity is going to fall. We just might not be here to see it.
Artery was a low-life and his parents should have been ashamed of him and apologized to his victims. How about we comb through the lives of Arbery and his parents for their words and views about whites, publish them for the world to see, apply their words and attitudes to their actions, call offsetting penalties, and go from there? While we’re at it, why not demand that every black who commits a crime against a white has his views of whites thoroughly examined and receive similar sentences as were handed out to the Brunswick Three?
I’m sure there are plenty of examples of violent and predatory blacks with very racist views of whites, who purposely committed acts of violence against completely innocent whites, who have no hate crimes charges filed. It’s probably the norm not to do so in such cases. Arbury was not murdered and he wasn’t chased because he was black. The case should have been dropped.
We in no position to laugh at the red skins.
The irredeemable Indians.
White skins are up next for the dust bin.
You theorize and write the most incredible drivel. If you have ever been in combat and faced a fast moving infantry assault you would be shocked at how quickly an opponent can be on top of you. Ask any veteran who has been in the line.
Arbery, running as if to run past, and then suddenly changing direction and charging his opponent from just a few feet away, and grabbing the shotgun, would have made it impossible to fire a warning shot or deliver a charge to the leg. Think the 21 foot rule !
What Arbery did was incredibly stupid. It looks like Travis had some military training and was proficient with the shotgun. Now seizing a shotgun by the barrel (even with two hands) when the possessor of the gun has a grip on the stock and fore stock is incredibly stupid. The shooter has the leverage.
With a rifle or pistol a single round may miss and the attacker may stand a chance. Against a shotgun the attacker is playing with fire. If it is a combat round then each shell contains 9 double OO shot each with a calibre of .33. A blast is like getting 9 x 32 calibre rounds at the same time. Wicked stuff ! Hence, 8 may miss in the initial struggle but it takes only one pellet to score to give the shooter a chance to unload a second round.
Go to the dollar store, buy a toy rifle and run this scenario with another person.
Consistent with what I said above, in Arbery’s case the first shot took out his wrist and chest, the second missed and the shooter correcting his aim, put Arbery down for good. One shot does not necessarily incapacitate an attacker. In the Angolan bush war I saw a combatant whose left shoulder had been demolished by an AK round, kill his attacker with a shovel. An attacker is incapacitated when he is DOWN !!!! Even in combat it is always safe to put a few rounds into the enemy on the ground just in case any of them are playing possum. Keep that in mind. One day it may save your life the way things are going in the USA.
Arbery, like every Nigger thought he could get the better of the White Man. He was incredibly stupid to attack a man with a shotgun. Even if he had won he would have lost as the he was covered by Travis”s father who was armed and would have gunned him down.
To your point though, it would have been better to cripple him with a blast(s) to the leg. No more running around white “hoods for him. Memories of Bernard Goetz putting one of his attackers in a wheel chair for life. Arbery was an obnoxious Nigger with a criminal mentality looking for a cap. If it was not a White Man one of his own would have wasted him. He wont be missed !
It does not matter where in the world, the black man is his own worst enemy his behaviour being the same no matter where he lives whether in the bush or a US urban centre.
BTW you dumb fuck, it was a pump action shotgun. Double barrel shotguns do not fire 3 rounds unless cranked open and reloaded. Your comments are usually utter shit !
Those redneck idiots deserve to rot in jail for their stupidity.
They decided to Play Cop and chase down a black dude and engage with him because they thought he was stealing?
It’s not your job! It’s not your place, or “duty” or responsibility you atavistic retards!
We pay aggressive, dumb, former jocks called cops to deal with these scenarios, not rednecks who still think it’s 1955.
Oh yes.
I was working on a project with a she boon and I saw she was making a huge mistake- over and over, like the illiterate AA hire she is.
Even 5 years ago, I would have given her a heads up.
Not now. She can rot in hell and live under a bridge. They are my enemy and any white who provides them aid and succor is my mortal enemy.
Until every last black person is expelled from these lands, we are in danger.
“Would you like some merlot? Eyes makes it in da toilet..” Big Barry..
What precisely, does your silly spew have to do with the article at hand?
All the arguments in this thread — both sides — are basically the same that were made when the three were correctly found guilty by the jury of their peers.
I followed the trial while it was playing out: listened to the arguments of the lead female DA, the defense attorneys, and the judge. I am not going to repeat my numerous posts from those threads at that time. But the three had ABSOLUTELY NO REASON to leave the safety of their houses and chase someone who at worst was suspected of burglarizing and empty house. NO REASON WHATSOEVER.
Admit it people: these three good-old Southern boys forgot what century this is and went “N____r hunting”. They got what they deserved: to rot in jail for the rest of their miserable lives.
[Ga. judge gives powerful statement before sentencing Ahmaud Arbery killers to life]
Video Link
only if non white. otherwise, forget it. anti white racism is all the rage and accepted by govts at all levels.
Dots or feathers… The fact that all native born “Indians” were not exterminated by White settlers is proof of their self control. Why is it that the slaughter of Whites at their hands is almost never discussed? Just because they were here first, (maybe) that gave Europeans no right to seek new land?
If you’re White, you should make a guilt riddled college professor happy and off yourself. The fact that overthrows of people has happened since the beginning of time and is still happening today right before our eyes should be of no surprise to cunts like you. And if you are White, and you think you’ll be spared because you’re and ass kisser, you might want to rethink your allegiances.
So that there is no question where I stand on these matters:
Derek Chauvin was falsely charged and convicted for a non-crime: of allegedly causing the death of drugged up, violently resisting George Floyd. The horrible optic of Chauvin non chalantly posing with his knee on the perp did not help him any either. He was convicted of murder (!): at worst it was negligent homicide.
He was falsely charged and convicted to appease the BLM mobs who were destroying and burning down entire neighborhoods. Government even charged and convicted the 3 other officers who there at the time. A Stalin-style kangaroo “justice”.
yer on my lawn
execution time
yer on my neighbors lawn
execution time
Great comment!
If you are White, being accused of racism is worse than being accused of murder or rape. You are guilty and you can never be proven innocent. Whites completely mishandled the race issue from the time slavery was ended and this is where it wound up. They never saw how Jews would exploit it.
The Woke Revolution is a dumbed-down version of The French Revolution.
Where the French Revolution had Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity, the Woke Revolution has Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (or, the now preferred alternative of diversity, equity, and inclusion – DIE, for short).
The French Revolution was an ideologically controlled attempt to create a perfect social world wherein man could regain the liberty, equality, and fraternity, that (it was believed) Nature had given him. And it was this belief (called the truth) that led directly to the Terror. The overall pattern is the same in both Revolutions. The only thing that’s changed is the terminology.
Just as Nature replaced God in the French Revolution, Identity has replaced by God and Nature in the Woke Revolution. There’s nothing progressive about it. It’s a regression to pre-modern tribalism. And anything pre-modern is maladaptive to a world that is more complex and unpredictable than ever before in human history, as is the world of today.
People are using the word insane a lot lately to describe what the hostile elite, et al. are doing. And insane is the right word. The Bold Inversion of Reality that Nietzsche attributed to the worst part of Jewish thought has now morphed into the single greatest denial of Reality in recorded history. What they might call Chutzpah, is now being called for it always was – Insanity. No wonder they see a rise in antisemitism. Just as it’s no wonder they constantly need to redefine the word.
The only bright spot is that the Woke Revolution, which exists to serve Supremacy Inc., is already meeting the same fate as the French Revolution. An explanation is possible.
The Terror came to an end simply because there was no way to limit it, no way derivable from either its belief-system or from its emotional reaction to what it was responding to. Everything spun out of control and, as everyone knows, the Revolution started eating itself, taking Robespierre with it, and not just him.
And just as many of Europe’s best supported the Revolution, at first, they eventually recoiled in horror from the Terror and were appalled at what happened, even more appalled by the development of an increasingly narrow, shallow, brutal and bloody dictatorship. And, like its predecessor, the Woke Revolution has turned into a garish and vulgar parody of the very thing it is still rebelling against, even though it now has complete institutional power and cultural control.
That’s why we are living in an absurd age when David has become Goliath while still pretending he’s David. Welcome To Sham World!
What the descent of the French Revolution into the degradation of the Terror meant was that the belief-systems we create in order to understand and control the world we live in can never exhaust the attributes of any situation it finds itself in, nor set up limits to any and every situation, except arbitrarily and by force. The higher the abstraction, the greater the violence. And what could be more abstract than liberty, equality and fraternity? Well, Diversity, Inclusion, and Equity. That’s what!
In other words, what the Terror of the French Revolution revealed is exactly what the violence of the Great Reckoning of the Woke Revolution is revealing, again. That our beliefs and the world we live in can never be reconciled. Facing this is our only hope.
It’s obvious that those committed to Supremacy Inc. and their Woke Revolution lack the courage, honesty, and intelligence to face this unpleasant fact. No surprise there, since self-awareness and psychotic arrogance don’t go together. That’s why they can’t see that they are destroying their own power faster than they can hang on to it.
What we are witnessing, what we’re all living through, is the collapse of yet another Salvation System. For those lucky enough to survive, their only hope going foward would be to abandon Salvation Systems once and for all. It’s worth pointing out that this was the direction not a few of the West’s brightest and best were heading in in response to the French Revolution. But, well, that’s another story.
Of course, the opposite, his parents are just like the son, and with the possibility of becoming super-wealthy overnight, they will stay with the lie.
Ultimately the police aren’t there to keep blacks down, they’re there to protect blacks from whitey.
Libtards and blacks are too stupid to realise that incarceration of blacks and their occasional termination by police is the price they pay for this.
I think they all assume that at some level. It won’t save them if or when the time comes and they are faced with violent blacks. “Don’t cut my head off, I made a snarky tweet about Trump, I had a BLM sticker on my car!”
So you’re on board with the elimination of individual liberties, most importantly those that allow people to defend property and life. Got it..
The sentences in this case were a damn joke. It was a clear message that if you’re White simply trying to talk to one of these things will get you burned at the stake if they go apeee and attack someone who was not threatening. They had multiple opportunities to gun this asshole down at any time and it took the retarded career criminal thinking he’d take a gun away from another person and ended his own life to create this shitstorm of a case. The simplicity of it is so obvious it’s mind numbing.. If he doesn’t attack the guy with the gun he’d still be alive, but that’s not the world live in anymore is it? The only thing these three idiots did wrong was not understanding the world we live in now when it comes to munts and self defense against them. IT”S NO LONGER ALLOWED. I agree with one thing you said, they should have never chased him, their right to do so under Georgia law is another matter however. Who in the hell with premeditated murder on their minds calls the police for help while recording the entire incident to protect themselves from criminal liability? There short answer is no one. One person belongs in prison from this incident, and that would be for manslaughter. The other 2 didn’t fire a shot, and they wouldn’t even consider a plea for either, which means only that this was a political lynching.
May 15, 2020 New video released in the Ahmaud Arbery murder case
Lawyers for the defense release a video showing Ahmaud Arbery at a construction site not far from where he was allegedly murdered in February.
Video Link
Feb 1, 2022 Federal Judge Rejects Plea Deal For McMichaels
Federal judge rejects plea deal that would have averted a hate crimes trial for convicted father and son murders, Travis and Greg McMichael.
Video Link
Yep – he had such “mortal terror” that he sprinted around a truck to attack a man with a gun.
Of course they did. They were following him to point out to police where he went. They did not threaten him or shoot him. Arbery went out of his way to attack one of the men and wrestled for his gun.
Whites have no right to self-defense against black criminals in the US.
“Those redneck idiots deserve to rot in jail for their stupidity.”
Always comes down to the same thing for Arbery defenders. Whites have no right to self-defense against black attackers.
So Arbery was in such great fear that he turned around and charged them while they were stopped in the road, grabbing the shotgun in most foolish fashion, instead of easily running away? Do you even realize how stupid that sounds? Although it seems like you are trolling, the MSM and black activist official narrative that was used to convict 3 innocent men, was similar to what you claim.
You approach this case using the Soviet, Russo-Judeo “logic” of self defence. Such an unjust system is still in place in Poland, a relic of our involuntary, Russian vassal past. Family dynasties of communist judges and prosecutors still hold sway, and you’d better not hurt an assailant or a home invader, you must let him cause all the harm he wants and let the “justice system”, the legacy communist bureaucracy help you, or whatever is left of you, later.
There was a case, more than 10 years ago, where a woman in Russia got 8 years in the gulag for stabbing and killing the rapist of her little daughter. Admittedly, she had lured him to meet her in a remote location, but only after having failed to obtain real justice through the courts. Around the same time an American rancher killed a Mexican farm-hand, a would be (perhaps a serial) child molester, who also had tried to have fun with the guy’s female child. He beat him to death on the spot, preventing many future crimes no doubt, and the jury acquitted him. ‘Murica!
This write-up from even before the trial is quite good:
https://lawofselfdefense.com/ahmaud-arbery-case-seven-facts-the-jury-will-probably-never-hear/
These communists always attack the competent, White people of good will, indirectly. In the past, they would use stupid workers/proletarians, union retards, and peasants, now they use other “oppressed minorities”. This is a feature of communism. As my great grandfather would say, there ain’t no room for an honest man, either on, or under the bench.
Justice is a serious matter, it should never be left in the hands of law school dimwits. People who can cope with advanced math and physics, of engineering background should decide these things, or just accomplished, wise men of stellar reputation.
Another outrage is using thought crimes against people, as if some evil deed grew in its impact by the factor of all the instances some forbidden word or idea could be tied to the accused. If a nigger tries to mug me, I should not have to be on guard, but justified to call him that, before or after I’ve dealt with him.
If I hold the door for an elderly, black lady, did I not act nice just because I had called “teens and youths”, joggers, etc. by their proper name in the past?
In the sixties, social and racial justice warriors could use all the tricks of law against the society, and courts would not admit illegally obtained evidence, motions to suppress, throw out, would be granted, all in the name of justice and fair treatment; if you were smart then, you knew it would not be so when the roles eventually reverse, when those activists ascend to power- and here we are.
In daily life, as well as in politics, evil enemies must be crushed completely, Pinochet and Franco have shown us the way.
These guys are totally innocent, but they did not act wise, it’s communism, you must let the ineffective, purposefully incompetent law enforcement deal with crime, it’s not like it used to be.
I am laughing but also realize you are 100% correct. Well done.
Those cockroaches really believe that their Twitter feeds will save them.
Boy, do they have a surprise coming when they encounter their first feral black.
I asked if it was two or three shots as earlier reports said three, which could have been from a pump action, but later reports said two.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/12/us/ahmaud-arbery-autopsy.html
I didn’t watch the video or I may have recognised the type of shotgun.
Anyway there were three of them, two armed, and they could have done better against one unarmed guy so as to not end up in jail for murder.
Look, apparently they knew about this guy so they had time to prepare their action better, for when they encounter him, so as to effect a citizen’s arrest, or at the most rough him up or cripple him if he resisted.
Dots Dick.
They wanted to act as a neighbourhood watch but considering there were three of them with two firearms and in a vehicle while he was alone, unarmed and on foot, I would think they could have done better than to go down for murder one.
This wasn’t quite the same as confronting a burglar in your house or dealing with a rapist or child molester; this was a confrontation on the street with someone who had not threatened them in any way until they threatened him. Anyway he was outnumbered so perhaps I was wrong to mention that those who killed him were somehow acting in self-defence, but they certainly used excessive force trying to achieve whatever it was they were trying to achieve. The examples you mention are irrelevant to this case.
Both racism and tolerance are sins.
Justice is much easier than Plato pretends. It’s just this: cooperate with cooperators, and don’t cooperate with defectors. It’s literally that simple.
There is a coherent definition of racism, it’s racial spite. Violation based entirely on race. If you’re attacking a cooperator because they have funny-looking eyes, that’s unjust.
Tolerance is also unjust. There is a coherent definition of tolerance: when you cooperate with someone who is defecting on you. Don’t do that.
That said, racism isn’t a big deal. Peasant in particular often can’t cooperate along racial lines. There are biological differences which need to be taken into account, and they don’t have the cognitive resources to afford to account for them. The races should be neither intolerant nor anti-racist, they should be segregated. Leave each other alone.
Repeating for emphasis: while unjust, racism just isn’t a big deal. If you refuse to leave someone alone, 98% of the time you’re a defector, and the racism is merely an excuse to commit the defection you were going to do anyway. In the vernacular, if a “racist” wasn’t an asshole for racism reasons, they would just be an asshole for some other reason, because the root cause is being an asshole, not some kind of weird religious/superstitious ideology.
No amount of “tolerance” will stop assholes from being assholes, for the reason that A=A. They will merely exploit “tolerance” as an excuse to go on being an asshole to you. Yes, you in particular. They need “tolerance” to prevent being excluded for being generally unpleasant and not worth your time.
Considering the racial sainthood that the Democrat ((media)) has bestowed upon blacks, and that the 3 men are all white and look like hillbillies – this was never going to get a fair trial, ever, not in a million years. Even a backwoods part of Georgia would have caved to the media ((pressure)).
On another note. The man who filmed the encounter and then gave the footage to a NYC lawyer was a huge dumb ass. That lawyer was most likely in the area fishing for dirt to use against the three of them and NOT to help them. That video is what did them in ultimately – even though it does show Arbery attacking the man with the gun – that doesn’t matter as the msm leaves that part out.
He knew what he did and what he was there for, and so did they, he got caught. If you come trespassing to steal, expect a reaction.
If someone grabs your gun (how stupid is that, if he had really been afraid for his life, he would have outrun all of them, even through backyards and fences, but he decided to confront them and attack, the aggressive criminal that he was), you defend yourself- that’s not excessive force.
It’s not uncommon for bystanders to help apprehend a thief until the cops show up. In the great state of Texas you can shoot trespassers if I’m not mistaken, may need a solid, justifiable reason. I don’t know.
If you go for someone’s gun (not a mugger’s gun, if that’s your only option), especially somebody’s you had just tried to steal from, and he knew why they were after him, it shows you’re a reckless lunatic capable of anything and without any self control. Everyone is fully justified to shoot in such a case.
Those examples just show the contrast between Russian law, and good ol’ American justice. Property rights used to be valued here. And there are similarities, seems to me you would rather have seen the rancher beat the crap out of the perp without killing him, as he too was unarmed. Unarmed is still dangerous, can be a deadly threat.
I’m probably missing something.
I’m just an ignorant working-class WHITE goy boy, who tinkers with engines and stuff, and contributes to the maintenance of the Civilization my ancestors built….but why did you publish this clumsy, awkward , extremely sloppily written anti-WHITE article by this vindictive Witch?
Am I missing something?
If I am, I’m sure some self-righteous keyboard faggot will point it out.
I don’t get this site at all.
How many fences can you sit on at one time ?
A white can get in trouble for associating US negroes with criminality? Associating them with criminality is like associating “2+2” with “4”. Jesse Jackson associates them with criminality – that is why he said that when walking down a city street at night, and hearing footsteps behind him, he is relieved to turn around and see that the sound is from a white person.
It’s almost always better to have a perp dead and not talking, than crippled. Especially with no other, potentially false witnesses. Never talk to cops, don’t volunteer any info. The video did them in, otherwise there would just be the shotgun with Robbery’s palm/fingerprints on the barrel.
It’s not just Soviet law, it’s the same in the UK and a lot of other countries.
Anyway he wasn’t trespassing when they confronted him. I’m just concerned that these guys threw away their lives dealing with him the way they did. Beating him up or crippling him they may have been jailed but definitely not for life.
I agree but then the same holds for those three guys – it’s not as if they did much better for themselves.
Racism is natural.
People, the world over, when they smile, they see white teeth, and think of white skinned people.
When they sit on the toilet and look at their poop, and see it is various shades of brown, they think of black skinned people.
Nature decided that teeth would be white like white people, and poop to be brown like black people.
Thus, racism is natural. Thank nature .
It will only get worse. The up and coming judges and lawyers are all radical shitlibs. There won’t even be a pretense of justice. It will just be endless show trials.
Every white person should be preparing to leave the USA in the next decade. I mean actually making plans, not just thinking about it.
Your post is loved by communists world wide.
They deserve to be in jail for breaking a de facto and de jure law, like an idiot.
In a real country it would not only not be illegal, they would get a medal. A fortiori: in a real country, the jogger would have been executed a long time ago and nobody would have had the opportunity to go chasing him.
They don’t live in a real country. They live in America. They live in GAE clownworld, where chasing down someone who deserves to die is illegal.
Rather than using the many methods open to them to change the law and make it less clownish, rather than (perhaps) concluding they don’t work and the busted system needs to be violently replaced, they just…violated the law. Like fucking idiots.
They weren’t fine upstanding citizens who were a credit to all their neighbours. It was white trash chasing black trash, and it’s best for everyone if they’re all executed. Or jailed, if that’s the best on offer.
That whole case was a shitshow. It is not going to change now.
Mr. Unz keeps publishing these defenses of Justifiable Vigilantes, so isn’t it about time he sets up a new category like he already has for World War II Articles and Moon Landing Hoax Articles?
Take that recent case of the Texas fellow who tracked down his stolen truck, then shot and killed the thief.
https://www.foxnews.com/us/texas-man-uses-apple-airtag-track-person-stole-truck-kills-police
Why not invite that hero to this site to write an article bragging about his feat? He might have suggestions about expanding his field of operations. Shoplifters? Election signs?
In the US there are laws against most everything. Proud Citizens could start “prosecuting” the crimes the believe aren’t properly or in a timely fashion by police.
True Libertarians could join the Defund The Police movement by encouraging people to do the needful work themselves. In Mississippi it’s illegal to have a second illegitimate child. Killing the bitch might be excessive, but burning down her house would make her think twice about doing it a third time.
https://codes.findlaw.com/ms/title-97-crimes/ms-code-sect-97-29-11.html
So, it’s the death penalty, without trial, for petty theft, is it?
Alright, I live in a very small town somewhere, which you have no access to. Ever.
We will handle things in our own way.
Well, hatred of anyone based solely on what ‘group’ they supposedly ‘belong’ to, is stupid and wicked, ain’t it? I’ve met a few half-decent ‘Whites’ here in Austfailia, I think.
“It was white trash chasing black trash, and it’s best for everyone if they’re all executed.”
Actually no. I have very few black people in my community and I was afraid of him from the git go, but it turns out that I don’t have to be afraid of him.
Is it racist to think some races are inherently more beautiful (and have more brain cortical neurons)?
W5 –the police—Why were they not called –no trust–the cops sleep nights? How long is the average arrival tine–who is on the force- where are they—how long do they take to respond – WHY were the cops not called ??? ( munching donuts at 7 eleven/ sleeping in their squad car/ filling out forrms/ listening to their radio ) —=Cops are servants to society –not the other way around
I already have (Panama). Honestly, I don’t know what people are waiting for.
You need to take your meds. Yes, the psychiatrists are not on your side. Yes, they are not really the right meds, and there is a much better option or could easily be. Nevertheless, it’s even worse without the meds. They work enough to be worthwhile.
They thought the nigger ought to behave like a good whites person might. They were not racists. Nor realists.
The most disturbing aspect of this case was that the comments on conservative websites like Breitbart and FreeRepublic.com were mostly against the McMichaels. When they were convicted later, after conservatives had time to study the case and see the truth, conservative comments still mostly celebrated the conviction.
Even many comments on boomer oriented, “race realist” websites were calling the McMasters’s guilty and defending the black felon as innocent.
Conservative whites from the older generation are completely cucked to blacks. Their number one political goal is “getting the black vote.” They are eager and proud to throw other conservative white people under the bus to pander to blacks who hate them. Then those same traitors cry about black crime and “Soros DA’s” when they themselves are no better than Soros on the black crime problem.
We have to destroy the American negro worship religion.
When the patriot revolution comes, Judge Wood should be captured, then kept in a small dog cage in public for the rest of her liberal, anti-white life.
Yes, if they were actually “racist,” they would have known that rounding up a posse to go nigger hunting in 2020 is a surefire way to land themselves in prison. A race realist knows to just avoid the groid. Blacks are a protected class and nothing good can come from interacting with them at all. If you have to defend yourself from one, use a non-lethal method like pepper spray. Even justified self defense is likely to get you locked up.
Arbery was a thug’s thug. Now they are building statues in his name. If you watch the video, it’s clear that Arbery committed suicide. He grabbed the gun, pulled it, and it went off. He wasn’t “jogging”. He was wearing work boots. You don’t jog in work boots. He stole from a construction site. He was on parole from a recent theft conviction. This should have been a non-story (self-defense). Instead, it is a metaphor for how despicable this country has become. A complete inversion of justice.
If he was in fear for his life he then he could have run in the opposite direction or towards a house yelling for help. Instead he had to be gangsta and run towards where he attacked Travis McMichael and rightfully paid for that act of stupidity with his life.
The McMichaels are heroes and should be released from prison and given 5 million dollars for all they’ve endured at the hands of the anti-white media and (in)justice system.
Like I’ve said many times before and will say again. Reverse the races and if there was a white Arbery constantly prowling around a black neighborhood the Jewish owned media would be hailing the black McMichaels as heroes defending their neighborhood and reporting on white Arbery’s rap sheet and prior run-ins with the law. They’d also paint white Arbery as a racist who was targeting a black neighborhood.
Reverse the races and the media coverage is starkly different. Reverse the races and this case doesn’t even go to court and if it did the black defendants might only get convicted for involuntary manslaughter and only spend 1-2 yrs in prison if that. But likely the case would be thrown out by a virtue signaling judge or they would be acquitted by a virtue signaling, negro worshipping jury.
Jewish power has made blacks into the new master race and atop the racial pecking order. The roles have been completely reversed in the South.
Whites owe America no allegiance or loyalty given how poorly we are treated and how the so called justice system seeks exemplary punishment against us if we dare have an altercation with a member of the black master race.
Groids are holy beasts in jewmerica.
Surely you must know that Breitbart and other assorted websites heavily curate and censor their comment sections. It would be helpful if you had mentioned the name of these various websites. My experience is much different than yours as I find that most younger people are far more “brainwashed” concerning blacks than the boomer generation.
“””They were of course stupid for brandishing a gun but their sentences are so extreme they defy all logic”””
————————————————————————
Arbery pulled travis’s gun towards himself which naturally caused it to go off. Travis was dumb to have the gun but this should have been manslaughter and 10 years for travis. Less for the father and nothing for the guy with the camera.
“”””Truly, I am starting to hate the whites who are allowing this to happen in equal portion to the blacks.””””
———————————————————————
Nobody likes a coward and whites are the champs at cowardice.
Is it just me or do they disturbingly look a lot like pigs a bit like the fellow we also know as emperor orange?
If the son had been given a manslaughter conviction, and perhaps the other 2 charged as accessories, I really wouldn’t see anything wrong with it. But this was obviously a case of excessive overcharging simply because no one could allow the admission that the dumb temperamental black had done a lot to turn what should have been a minor incident into a full-blown confrontation. It was dumb for them to get out of the vehicle and go walking up to him. Maybe a 5-year sentence, with some prospects of parole and probation, would have served a good purpose to pound some sense into their heads. But this sentence was ridiculous. I do think that a lot of the fault here goes to the old man who had been a cop for a few decades. He really seemed to think that he was still wearing a badge. If 3 uniformed cops had stopped this moron in the exact same way, then there would be nothing them on. Since these guys were not on-duty cops, they should have stayed in their vehicles and just followed Arbery until the police arrived. But the life-sentences which they got were preposterous.
Read the Fucking Room you idiots. This whole story pisses me off. How can white citizens be so very stupid about the race war raging around them. You could not screen write a story that better captures Trump Maga White Racism if you tried.
Gregory McMichaels and his son are so very very dumb. This father has totally destroyed his son’s life. I feel sorry for the whole lot. What a bunch of fucking idiots. It is not the wild wild west. You can’t drive around drinking beer and hunting niggers. Gregory McMichael should have not retired from law enforcement if he still wanted to play cops and robbers.
How incredibly dangerous to be chasing some black kid with a pickup truck and your son totting a shot gun, shouting ….”get him pa”. How so very stupid. And what good did you accomplish. Is the neighborhood safer? Did you stroke your own ego?? Did you teach your boy….how to be a man???
Nope, instead you just proved once again, that young black males have very low IQ and very low impulse control. Your boy got jumped and was forced to kill a young black man —for stealing power tools???? Completely idiotic and senseless.
What is the cultural climate in America?????? What is acceptable? Does this retired cop ever read a damn newspaper? What is the black race doing these days. It is 2023 – we are the very height of Black Negro Worship in America —looting is sanctioned in major cities across America.
What is the Black Race getting away with these days? Just 229 Miles away you got this shit going on in a Walmart in Tampa Bay Florida?
200 black looters, smash and grab, snatching and grabbing, laughing and giggling —cumulatively stealing Hundreds of Thousands of dollars worth of product. And they all walked out loud and proud —not one being held accountable:
This makes the Ahmaud Arbrey death look ridiculously unnecessary. And it was.
Video Link
All three of these IDIOTS remind me of another fucking DILDO IDIOT COP. I mean damn…..READ THE ROOM. Use your brain. Why make yourself into a Poster Child for White Racism? What in the fuck was going this dudes mind, looking around seeing 20 cell phones recording your every move. How damn stupid do you have to be??
At the end of the day….why did these three idiots care about some skinny black kid stealing construction tools? So what if he steals a $40.00 Makita drill or some hammers and dry wall saws. All of that is insured by the company contracted to build those houses.
And then you have this golden nugget of Racism by the third Musketeer, Mr. Bryan:
He handed the Prosecutors the “Race Card” on a golden plater. What a fucking IDIOT.
Reminds me of another fucking idiot cop blurting out racist statements, who literally saved OJ Simpson from execution and allowed him to walk FREE.
If they can make about RACE then it is OVER. The media will smear you into oblivion. Your White Judge will hang you to protect his own house and his own family. Don’t think for a minute that judge did not fear BLM and Antifa thugs stalking him in public and/or setting his house on fire.
This father, his son and his beer drinking buddy all got FUCKING SHAFTED. Read the Damn Room YOU IDIOTS. Understand the Political Climate surging around you. As a white man, you and your loved ones walk in a racial tender box in 2023. As a white man standing guard against black thugs, you will be slaughtered in the press, crucified in court and your fat ugly mug converted into a soap box for some Socialist Democrat Politician to stand upon and feign outrage and offer guarantees of reparations and finally black equity. You and Your son (your little boy) rot in prison for the rest of your doomed, pathetic lives. So very sad. So thoughtless and unnecessary.
Black Couple Says Texas Authorities Seized Their Newborn Because They Chose a Midwife Over a Hospital
https://news.yahoo.com/black-couple-says-texas-authorities-213000239.html
Short story: A pair of dirty, stupid, and dangerous n*ggers attempted to arrange medical care for their newborn infant independently of their pediatrician. No matter what the color of this doctor, their action was taking money out of HIS pocket, so he called the cops. Why would The Authorities in Dallas, Texas be so cooperative? N*gger Control! This is something the current Author understands.
Why would black parents want to be careful with the US medical system? It’s because maternal mortality is a lot worse for Black Women than for White Women. (just the way things ought to be according to our Superior White Christians)
What about comparing college-educated Black Women with high-school dropout whites?
Again, our Superior White Christians will be pleased, for this surely decreases the numbers of Uppity N*ggers around.
https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/issue-brief-report/2020/dec/maternal-mortality-united-states-primer
So Hurrah for Texas.
A big Boo to Georgia for putting Superior White Christians in Prison for offing a DS*DN.
Finally, a huge shout-out to Tennessee. Decorum in the Legislature of this former Confederate State is FAR more imporatant than the lives of Tennessee children.
But the cops don’t deal with the criminals. It takes a while from the time someone hits 911 on the phone for a cop or cops to get there. And by that time the crime is committed and the criminal gone.
What kind of engines do you tinker with? Search engines? You talk more like a troll than a gear-head.
I just don’t understand this story. I saw NBC cover this and their report stated that three white guys chased down a Black jogger and shot him in cold blood. I’m sure that a member of the MSM is incapable of lying or misrepresenting facts,
White collar swindlers steal a lot more than a guy on foot could possibly steal from a building site, yet people don’t go looking to kill them. Well, maybe there have been a few cases where a victim caught up with a fraudster.
“The summary does not mention that Arbery had grabbed Travis’s gun and that the two men were fighting for control of the weapon when Travis pulled the trigger.”
A foolish omission. Viewers of the video can clearly see the criminal, Armed Rohbery, assaulting Travis and trying to take his shotgun away. The moment Armed Robbery made a move for the shotgun, his assault became one with a deadly weapon, a forcible felony to which an appropriate and lawful response is the use of deadly force to stop it.
Exactly.
But the boomer normies of Unz still believe in “Muh self defense!”
It wasn’t a case of self defense.
It was a case of aggressive, 90 IQ hicks letting their emotions take control and they are paying the price.
Aggressive behavior is almost always stupid.
Arbery was not an immediate threat to anyone.
The hicks could have called the cops and reported it but they had to be stupid, macho vigilantes!
The lack of awareness and judgement is almost hard to believe.
But THEY initiated the contact!
You can’t approach an unarmed person aggressively with a shotgun then cry “Self defense” when they try to take the gun and get shot.
They initiated.
The jury had one black and 11 whites!! That says it all about what cowards whites are.
You’re assuming like some here that the trial and fabricated evidence is the truth. That they went out with the intent to kill this POS. Who the hell with premeditated murder on their minds calls the police for assistance and records the entire event to protect themselves from criminal liability? The answer is no one. We can argue about how stupid they were all day long, but the mind readers on this ready made lynch mob prosecution team are scum of the highest order. There was absolutely zero evidence that these men went out to intentionally kill this idiot. That’s why some are so pissed off about the prosecutor shopping and double jeopardy implications. The sentences they received were a damn joke. Had this been a couple of munts that killed this thing, they’d have probably plead this shit to manslaughter 2 and got a 6 to 12 year sentence, which is what the shooter in this incident should have received if there was any real justice. The other 2 should have had all charges dismissed.
“”””It was a case of aggressive, 90 IQ hicks letting their emotions take control and they are paying the price.””””
———————————————————————
The price and then some. This was not murder and they did not deserve life in prison.
The retards attack Western Civilization.
Both the nose goblins and their terrorists.
They need killing these terrorist scum.
Its about time for Whites to step up.
The failed state is teetering and weak.
Now is the time to burn the swamp.
War has been made upon you.
Its about time to fight back.
We outnumber the enemy by 30 to 1.
Attack the Synagogue directly.
The Synagogue of Satan will not stop.
They must be treated like the cancer they are.
“Mr. Bryan temporarily lost contact with Arbery, but later approached him from the rear as Arbery was confronted by the McMichaels.”
Arbery was not confronted by the MMs. Arbery attacked the MMs as they just stood there while Arbery ran straight for them and attacked.
I wish people would see what is on the video.
If people would actually watch the video, they would easily see Arbery charging the MMs for several car lengths if not more. If he had wanted to, Arbery could have run left or right to escape. But he didn’t want to escape, he decided to attack the MMs.
Arbery decided to attack them while the MMs just stood there as Arbery approached. With the blows Arbery was raining down on the guy’s head, Arbery could have easily killed the guy (just like blacks have killed people with one blow to the head in their knock out games).
No yankees need be involved in any of the killing of ‘innocent’ people around the world, as they do a very good job themselves.
That retarded monkey was was gut shot with a shotgun.
I wish they had that on video…lol
You’re a Limey douchebag, correct?
Mr. McNally – I completely agree with your assessment of the case. What I find especially ludicrous and cruel about the verdicts and sentences is that the McMichaels were found guilty of FOUR counts of felony murder (2nd degree murder?) and Bryan three counts. Regardless of the consolidation of “aggravated assault” charges, etc., HTF can this happen when there is only ONE victim! And Bryan was completely unarmed, and just tagging along in a separate vehicle with his phone/camera. Maybe one of the resident lawyers on TUR can help explain this.
My own view holds that the judge, prosecutors and jury were all so intimidated by the presence of so many, uh, (((blacks))) inside and outside the courtroom they felt they had, to insure their own safety, no alternative but to seek the maximum charges and punishment available under Georgia state law. Hence these severe results:
https://www.news4jax.com/news/georgia/2021/11/24/verdict-is-in-jury-hearing-ahmaud-arbery-death-trial-has-reached-a-verdict/
It’s not a crime to openly carry a shotgun in GA. And, it’s not a criminal act to approach someone, even with a shotgun in hand, and ask to talk. What is clearly illegal, and an assault with a deadly weapon, is to try to rip a shotgun out of someone’s hands. Deadly force is justified to stop this forcible felony in all 50 states.
The right to defend oneself is the first law of nature. It is illegal and immoral to not uphold this right.
“I wish people would see what is on the video.”
Amen. It’s there for all to see. You have to be marinated in The Narrative to see otherwise.
Yeah, and up is down, left is right and killing another is ‘self-defence’. Race hatred certainly kills of those little grey cells.
I can easily see this as having been manslaughter or murder with diminished responsibility ie through reckless behaviour. But VICIOUS racists like you, calling Arbery a ‘thing’, ought really crawl back under your rocks. As ever with the adversarial system of injustice, obtaining the truth is not of interest-‘winning’ is all. It’s like Western ‘elections’. It’s not the policies to improve society that count, but gaining power, to do what you really desire.
Are you saying that the jurors should vote according to their ‘race’?
A nigger is gonna nig though. These pursuers didn’t realize he was a nigger. Much like chasing after a dog who’s stolen a steak. A Dog is gonna Dog.
I’ll say it again. Arbery is a piece of subhuman simian garbage who got what he deserved. Arbery was a cancer that needed to be excised from civil society.
It’s a damn shame that three honorable white men had to “pay the price” in a kangaroo court for “taking out the garbage”.
Arbery, who was “studying to be an electrician”, yeah right. Anyone who believes THAT needs to get his head examined…
Fair enough.. But I’ve never hurt anyone in my life through the use of savage violence. When looking at the rates of robbery, rape, murder and every other method of viciousness deployed by these “people” I’m a fucking saint in comparison. When it comes to the accusation of racism, no race even comes close to animosity and hatred coming them.. Clearly you’ve never been, or known anyone that has been a victim of the talents and ruthlessness of a group of these out of control human hyena’s. (An insult to Hyena’s by the way) Just looking at what they’ve turned so many of our cities into should be enough to clear up any confusion, but I’m sure you have a canned response with more than one excuse where it’s people like me that are to blame.
I’m going to assume that your experience with Blacks, (much less “American Blacks”) is very limited to say the least. Just like the vast majority of self-hating White Leftist Filth.
You and your kind should really move into some Black majority cities here in the US.
Show those dirty monkeys a little LUV.
All they need is LUV, bro…lol
The jews treatment of the Palestinians is racism, there lies the problem.
True. Not everything that shines is gold.