The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Edward Dutton Archive
Britain Is Now a Sectarian Society
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
List of Bookmarks

England is now a sectarian society. As of the General Election, on 4th July, some people are sent to parliament by specific religious and ethnic communities simply because they are members of those communities, not because of the policies they espouse. A system which has long existed in sectarian Northern Ireland has now come to the English mainland. The reason? Mass immigration into England over the last 25 or so years of South Asian Muslims, who are highly concentrated in certain areas.

The UK’s General Election has led to the utter humiliation of the ruling Conservative Party, which had been in power for 14 years and done nothing to reverse the process of mass immigration set off by Tony Blair’s Labour Party in the early 2000s. In fact, they’d accelerated it, with more than 745,000 legal immigrants arriving in 2022 alone, putting appalling pressure on housing and public services, putting aside what this does to national unity [Net migration to UK hit record 745,000 in 2022, revised figures show, By Patrick Butler and Peter Walker, The Guardian, November 23, 2023]. Led by Rishi Sunak, a second generation Indian immigrant, the party, which has existed since the seventeenth century, was plunged into its worst defeat ever, gaining just 121 seats in the 650 seat House of Commons which, as in the US, is elected by First Past the Post. Labour, under its rather dull leader, Sir Keir Starmer, attained the second largest majority in its history.

But far more interesting, and worrying, is the fact that a number of Labour MPs in previously strongly Labour areas lost their seats. Specifically, they lost them to independent Islamist candidates standing on Pro-Gaza platforms. In Leicester South, in the East Midlands, a senior Labour MP lost his seat to a South Asian Muslim, who was once a Labour supporter, who declared, upon victory, “This is for Gaza!” and held up a keffiyah; the head scarf which is strongly associated with the Palestinian cause. In Blackburn, in the northwest, the sitting Labour MP was defeated by an independent called Adnan Hussain, a lawyer who declared: “This is for Gaza. I cannot deny that I stand here as the result of a protest vote on the back of a genocide.” Iqbal Mohammed, an IT consultant and once a Labour supporter, took Dewsbury and Batley, also in the northwest, from Labour on a manifesto of fighting for a ceasefire in Gaza. Ayoub Khan, a barrister and former Liberal Democrat councillor, took Birmingham Perry Bar from Labour as a Pro-Gaza independent [Who are the pro-Gaza independents who unseated Labour MPs? By Haroon Sidique, The Guardian, July 7, 2024]. In addition, a number of senior Labour MPs came close to losing their seats to Pro-Gaza candidates [Labour cannot afford to be complacent over pro-Gaza vote losses, By Josh Halliday, The Guardian, July 5, 2024].

Labour has long taken the Muslim vote for granted, but its failure to condemn Israel’s actions in Gaza has led to a political uprising which the First Past the Post System is uniquely set up to deliver. In democratic terms, the 2024 general election is an absurdity. The Labour Party took 411 seats (64% of the seats), and a majority over all other parties of 178, on just 33.7% of the national vote. With 12.2% of the vote, the Liberal Democrats took 72 seats, while the populist conservative Reform Party, led by Nigel Farage who very much spearheaded Brexit, got just 5 seats on 14% of the vote. These were all seats that very strongly supported Brexit [Wikipedia]. (The Conservative Party: 23.7 percent vote share and 121 seats.)

The Reform vote share differed so wildly from the number of seats won because it was roughly even nationwide; they came second or third in numerous seats. Muslims, however, are concentrated into very specific areas; usually ex-industrial towns. In many of these towns, they have set up parallel societies: everybody is a South Asian Muslim (due to White Flight and people’s evolutionary desire to be with people like themselves), the community is centred around a number of (often fundamentalist) Mosques, people are highly religious, and there is a strong feeling of fighting against the dominant society [see Among the Mosques: A Journey Across Muslim Britain, By Ed Husain, 2022]. It is conditions like this that allow Muslim independents to be elected, once they reject the Labour Party which they have done due to its stance on Gaza. In that regard, it is surely no coincidence that the seats that sent Reform Party members to parliament were overwhelmingly native British and substantially working class.

Of course, once this happens you have sectarianism and this is the end of democracy, or the beginning of the end, because people are not voting on policy, they are simply voting for a person who represents their ethnic group. Finnish political scientist Tatu Vanhanen spelt this out in his book Ethnic Conflicts. Although it is possible for multi-ethnic societies to be democracies – India is an example – in general there is a negative association between ethnic diversity and the ability to sustain democracy. This is mediated by ethnic conflict. In fact, Vanhanen found that ethnic diversity explains 66% of the variance in ethnic conflict when you compare different countries. In other words, ethnic diversity is very likely to lead to ethnic conflict and this is, in turn, likely to lead to sectarianism, which will render democracy hollow.

India, though it is multi-ethnic, generally shares a religion – about 80% of Indians are Hindu – and the ethnic groups of which it is composed are all relatively similar. This is not the case in the UK, where the independents MPs are of a different race and a different religion than the native population. It follows that the UK cannot be compared to India and that it really is seeing – in the most stark fashion with the election of these MPs – what has a long been happening anyway; the break-up of the country into a parallel societies; into Muslim and non-Muslim areas.

This shouldn’t be surprising. As I have explored in detail in my book The Past is a Future Country: The Coming Conservative Demographic Revolution, the ethnic diversity, mass immigration and the splintering of large polities always occurs in the winter of civilization and it is likely happening in the US as well. How deliciously ironic that Labour candidates, who have dogmatically espouse mass immigration and condemned critics as “racist,” are now losing their seats in parliament due to the sectarianism that has developed due to mass immigration.

(Republished from The Occidental Observer by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 20 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. it’s not “worrying” that a handful of Labor-Zionist scumbags got replaced by Pro-Palestine imported sandniggers.

    it’s a very good thing. And an equally good thing that the Zio-cucked Tories got trounced.

    Because First Necessity for White survival is the liquidation of the Jew-owned Fake Right.

    • Agree: nokangaroos
    • Replies: @Dvaren
    , @RadicalCenter
  2. Who is Ed the Hussain?

    Ed Husain is a senior adviser at the Tony Blair Faith Foundation and an adjunct senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, specializing in Islamist movement, the Middle East and counter-terrorism policy.

    https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/expert/ed-husain/

    https://cjc.georgetown.edu/people/ed-hussain/

  3. Labour has been owned by the tribe whose name must not be spoken since John Smith dropped dead “unexpectedly” and replaced with Tony Blair. The tribe has always seen Moose-lems as “natural allies”, which is why they were imported en masse. One could ask, as many others have, if they were “natural allies” for the tribe, who are the enemies? Not the Empire Windrush crowd, to be sure. Maybe it was the Hindus and Sikhs who had also been pouring into Britain.

  4. pythas says:

    Fuck those fish and chip eating red-coat shits and all the 3rd world coolies living on that rump island in the North Atlantic.

  5. Enoch Powell said it best before the original woke movement removed him, he said:

    We must be mad, literally mad, as a nation to be permitting the annual inflow of some 50,000 dependants, who are for the most part the material of the future growth of the immigrant-descended population. It is like watching a nation busily engaged in heaping up its own funeral pyre.

    Modern day, vassal state Britain proves him right.

    • Replies: @Anonymous 1
  6. @Mr_Chow_Mein

    When I see or hear the name Enoch Powell then this comes to mind.

    ENOCH POWELL AND THE CHURCH OF ENGLAND REVIEW INTO HISTORICAL CHILD SEX ABUSE.

    In 2015, Powell was named in a Church of England review into historical child sex abuse concerning the 1980s. One of its spokespersons told the press that: ‘The name Enoch Powell was passed to Operation Fernbridge on the instruction of Bishop Paul Butler’. The information originally came from a cleric who has counselled child abuse victims in the 1980s.

    Powell’s sexual interest in younger men was a long-standing trait. In 1937, having graduated with a double first from Cambridge, Powell had become a classics professor at the University of Sydney. He was only 25 and held the post for two years during which he wrote to his parents describing his infatuation with his male students. He told them how he was repelled by his female students, while feeling ‘an instant and instinctive affection’ for Australian males between the ages of 17 and 23. This, he added, might be ‘deplored, but it cannot be altered’, and therefore had to be ‘endured – and (alas!) camouflaged’. Somewhere along the line Powell developed an interest in much younger boys.

    https://coverthistory.ie/2024/03/29/jeffrey-donaldsons-mentor-was-a-child-abuser-by-david-burke/

    • Replies: @MarkU
    , @Mr_Chow_Mein
  7. MarkU says:
    @Anonymous 1

    As soon as I read your post an idea came to mind. A quick search on Wikipedia (yes I know) confirms that Enoch Powell was sent to an all boys school. If you want to maximise the chances of your offspring becoming homosexual, sending them to a single sex school during the formative years of their sexuality is a good way to start.

    • Replies: @Dvaren
    , @Anonymous 1
  8. Dvaren says:
    @Haxo Angmark

    Hey stupid, when they’re done with the Jews you’ll be next.

    You’re simply too stupid to understand it. They’ll rip apart everything Europeans built, abolish their culture, and murder their people.

    But there you’ll be cheering them on right up until your own head is on the block. They’ll laugh as you gurgle out your last breath.

  9. Dvaren says:
    @MarkU

    You’re a special level of stupid now aren’t you?

    • Replies: @Rocky Road
  10. PCR and Zman just had articles intensively quoting John Adams on the likely eventual failure of all democracies.
    As multi-ethnicity only serves an accelerator of that failure, it follows that this must be the real goal of our elites: turning democracies into totalitarian systems via an interim step of ‘our democracies’.
    And mutual cooperation and co-existence of countries into a world government, via the interim step of ‘our rules-based international order run by a hegemon’.

    • Agree: RadicalCenter
  11. @Dvaren

    After reading your comments here, you sound like a real prick.

    • Replies: @Dvaren
  12. @MarkU

    Study finds LGBQ people report higher rates of adverse childhood experiences than straight people, worse mental health as adults
    A new study led by researchers at Vanderbilt found that 83% of lesbian, gay, bisexual and queer (LGBQ) individuals reported going through adverse childhood experiences such as sexual and emotional abuse, and worse mental health as adults when compared to their heterosexual peers…

    https://news.vumc.org/2022/02/24/study-finds-lgbq-people-report-higher-rates-of-adverse-childhood-experiences-than-straight-people-worse-mental-health-as-adults/

    For generations of boys, sexual abuse was part of the everyday cruelty of boarding school. In this painfully honest report, writer Alex Renton confronts the demons of his past at Ashdown House, where some of Britain’s most powerful men were also educated – and reveals the scale of the outrage about to engulf the private education system.

    https://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/may/04/abuse-britain-private-schools-personal-memoir

  13. @Haxo Angmark

    Why are the “british” people such heartless, satanic scumbags that they support or go along with the deliberate starvation of a million innocent human beings?

    Why are white “british” people such vicious or cowardly bastards that they support or go along with the intentional mass murder of hundreds of thousands of babies, children, women, old people, handicapped people, and doctors and patients inside hospitals?

    WHY does it take the “importation of sand-n—-rs” to develop a coalition of people with the decency and courage to protest against the attempted genocide of the Palestinian people?

    Because the native Brits are NO … FUCKING … GOOD.
    But we, and the rest of the world, already knew that.

    Because the faggots and thieves and mass murderers known as “Brits” are in no position to mock or condemn anyone.

  14. @Anonymous 1

    I cannot understand what a person sexuality has to do with their concerns for their people and culture.

    Innuendo was a great way to shut people up in the past…the elite used it superbly when someone was saying things they didn’t like.

    • Agree: Cloverleaf
    • Replies: @Vergissmeinnicht
  15. Farenheit says:

    I cannot understand what a person sexuality has to do with their concerns for their people and culture.

    When your principle loyalty is to your base desires or perversions, your thinking processes and political vision can become very very skewed…

    Please do a quick look up of California State Senator Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco) for illustration.

    • Thanks: Anonymous 1
  16. @Mr_Chow_Mein

    I still remember:
    Anarcho-Capitalist Prof Hoppe once stated that (I’m paraphrasing, BTW) “No-one should listen to gays because they’ve no concern for the future, since they’ve BY DEFINITION no biological children.”

    His University fired him, or something. But he won the battle in Court, and his position as Prof re-instated.

    Is his argument true? That must be explored and studied. But for sure it is logical.

  17. MP’s that were ousted in the UK Election are crying wolf and making up accusations against those that were voted in by their old constituents and want them removed from office.

    The Zionist Lobby wants those independent candidates removed from office!


    Video Link

  18. Tony M says:

    Another seat that was decided on tribal lines was East Renfrewshire. Once a Tory-holdout. Churchill identified Glasgow, after Poland and Berne, when he was anti-Communist in the twenties, before being bought-off by Jewish funny-money, as a dangerous centre of Jewish revolutionary agitation and power. Much of the slum reputation of the Gorbals area, resulted from the huge number of Jews who settled there and turned what was once a respectable area into an over-crowded sub-divided insanitary shit-hole. Many of them became Rachmanite landlords, preying on working-class Scots and later Asians who lived in the shocking conditions they created and left behind. The owners were bought out at great cost by Glasgow City Council, as they would not improve the buildings and flats with even non-communal toilets. The so-called Great Synagogue there sat south of the river between Warwick Street and South Portland Street, the whole area was flattened for the never-built southern flank of the proposed ring-road, and only a tiny part of South Portland street, right next to the Clyde remains. Where did they all go to, they spread out over the southside and clustered around Eastwood. They associated with Glasgow Rangers Football Club, and Ulster Protestant Loyalism as a form of crypsis and bear much responsibility for the anti-Catholic and anti-Irish sectarianism and violence that blighted the city and west of Scotland.

  19. Dvaren says:
    @Rocky Road

    I’m only a prick to the stupid folks.

    I’m sorry you qualified.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Edward Dutton Comments via RSS