Although he was found guilty of lying, albeit by a manifestly biased parliamentary enquiry based on a report by a civil servant who went on to work for the Labour Party, there is an extent to which you know where you are with former Conservative Prime Minister Boris Johnson. I’ve had a soft spot for him since 2003 when I submitted an article to The Spectator, which he edited. Rather than ignore it or send out a standard rejection letter, Boris took the trouble to the write back, explaining why he liked the piece but why it was not quite suitable for his magazine. For that is what Boris is about; the Shakespearian jester-type who makes other people feel good and who, through this comedy persona, is able to get away with things which would finish off ordinary politicians.
Charisma is often a response to profound sadness and it buoys up the charismatic as much as it does his audience. This is clear in Boris’ long-awaited brick of a memoir Unleashed, which, in my view, vies with John Major: The Autobiography as the most readable Prime Ministerial memoir ever penned. The key difference is that Major is extremely self-aware, sometimes disarmingly honest, and shares with us the many poignant moments from his early life that have made him who he is. Boris doesn’t dream of doing anything like that, and, let’s face it, you wouldn’t expect him to. There is nothing about his extremely unhappy and difficult childhood in which he was part deaf and lived in an isolated farm house with parents who violently despised each other. To the extent he looks at his childhood at all, it’s jolly memories of his brief time at a state primary school.
As I’ve said, the point is to take us on a jolly jape. Boris is particular good at this, due his comedic brilliance. The Supreme Court judge who tried to scupper Brexit, and who wore a silver spider-shaped brooch is referred to as “the curse of Spiderwoman,” while the UK’s anti-Brexit Establishment are “prune-lipped Pharisees.” Boris is self-aware enough to concede that he is “gaffe-prone,” but, then, he would concede this; it is part of his comic charm and of his cunning: Appear a tad helpless and people will love you. The women will want to mother you, the men won’t see you as a real threat and so will underestimate you, or they’ll believe that they can obtain true power with you as the comic frontman. And before you know it, you’re Conservative Mayor of London (a Labour city), and then Prime Minister, winning a large majority, including numerous seats in safe Labour areas, breaking the deadlock and finally bringing Brexit about.
Boris admits, though, that, secretly, he’s worked hard to get there, but even here there is comic camouflage and poetic skill: “Some people have a knack for being in the right place at the right time. They just happen to be under the tree when the apple plops into their lap. Some people have to bash and butt at the base of the tree for an awfully long time until the exhausted apple stalk can bear the weight no longer. I am definitely in the second category.” In many ways, these sentences encapsulate Boris’ rhetorical brilliance. There are so many layers to this. We are invited to imagine a genius – Isaac Newton – sitting beneath the apple tree, yet this is contrasted with the onomatopoeic “plop,” and the comedically scatological dimensions of this word. We then imagine someone like Newton, perhaps Boris in a late-seventeenth wig, bashing at the tree of UK politics and its apple of being the UK’s premier – with a self-deprecating nod to his being overweight – until it just gives up and, exhausted, says, “Okay, Boris, old bean, you can be Prime Minister.” It is this kind of skill with which he ascended so high and did so relatively quickly.
Boris also wants to transport us to an idealised old England in which he was our Shakespearian Fool leader. He achieves this, for example, by frequently quoting canonical poetry, such as Thomas Gray’s “Elegy Written in a Country Churchyard,” about dead peasants and the talents they wasted confined to a tiny village. Johnson, apparently deeply moved by this poem, uses it to explain why he wanted to “level up” the British education system, so he manages to boast about a supposed achievement of his premiership. But he’s managed to make it not seem like bragging, because he’s beguiled us into being in an idyllic English country churchyard with him in which he is a shaman, into which the spirit of Englishness has somehow entered; his recent Turkish ancestry not with-standing.
I could give many other examples of this skill, but it also means that we are intellectually disarmed. He justifies his ludicrous green policies on the basis of Pascal’s Wager. We should be fervent environmentalists just in case the climate change alarmists are correct. This is an absurd comparison. He is suggesting that we should make life less enjoyable, more expensive and more difficult just in case Woke fanatics are right. By the same “just in case” logic, Boris should have shut the borders the moment there was the slightest hint of Covid-19. By the same logic, there is evidence that multiculturalism leads to inter-group violence and the collapse of society, so it’s quite obvious what he should have done “just in case.” The problem is that he is so bumblingly likeable and persuasive that he makes you actively not want to seriously scrutinise him, which is part of his political genius. As I motorist, I cannot stand cyclists, yet he is an avid cyclist and he almost makes me sympathise with them with his Romantic portrayal of their vocation.
All of this, though, permits him to smuggle in the fact that, on many issues, he is secretly rather based, and he can do this because of the way he has charmed people. For example, in Chapter Two he dares to look at intelligence and the extent to which it is genetic. Politicians have been fired for saying as much. “As I close my eyes and wait for the judgment of the examiners on myself, I feel I am in the presence of some ineluctable biological-process. I have read somewhere that intelligence like other human qualities reverts to the mean (Was it H.J. Eysenck that gave me that idea? Eysenck it was.).” To those “in the know” he is making it clear that he understands the biological realities, he is scientifically literate and he is based. For the more purple-pilled, pathetic conservative reader, there is the pun to soften the blow and to permit Boris to pretend he was joking all along. He even explores, indirectly, the issue of Incels and their causes (women are more educated than men but want to marry hypergamously in terms of education), though Boris makes out that someone far cleverer than he has explained this to him and he is just blithely accepting it: “In his view, there are complex reasons for the drying up of social mobility, not least the habit of ‘assortative mating’, by which female graduates tend to only marry men who are themselves graduates. . . . The only way to break the cycle of assortative mating . . . is for more female graduates to be encouraged to marry hod-carriers and dustbin men . . .”
And he also traffics in some seriously interesting stuff, such as that the Queen did not die of “old age” but rather of bone cancer. She’d known she was dying for a year and, of course, it’s all been covered up. A friend of mine, a consultant geriatrician, told me at the time that the state of the Queen’s hands strongly implied treatment for some kind of cancer, so I am inclined to believe Boris on this one.
But the problem is, his rhetorical skill and charisma mean that I’m inclined to believe him on most things, even though I know, deep down, that I have been manipulated by this self-serving autobiography wherein he never displays genuine weakness and never looks honestly, or at all, at his painful and rogue-ish, womanising personal life. Instead, you sit down in a pub with him and have a laugh, forgetting that he needlessly closed those pubs for the best part of two years, backing down to shrill, manipulative voices opposing the very sensible policy of herd immunity. Such is Boris’ skill and charisma, on such evident display in 700-plus pages of Unleashed.
sycophantic tripe, written by the president of bojo the clown fan club. i wonder if he has his rejection letter framed or if he just keeps it under his pillow?
boris johnson is one of the most repugnant and arrogant, elitist swine imaginable and is personally responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of ukrainians that have died senselessly after he scuttled the istanbul agreement. he is a warcriminal, as are all involved in the promotion and planning of of their zato takeover of ukraine.
blowjo is as thick as the brick he wrote, that should be entitled “unhinged”. he is nothing but a reprehensible cur and how anyone could be impressed with this walking pile of dross, is beyond me. someone please put this overgrown, repulsive pug, back on it’s leash, before it shits on the rug.
Fact that he did close down the pubs and he’s 100% onboard with the Gaza genocide.
So when the private jets leave for New Zealand he needs to fight for his seat (not guaranteed).
Then start some serious groveling.
Was Brexit a precondition for making war on Russia via Ukraine? Discuss…Bojo’s A-Level answer in to be found in the book.
When was the last time that the UK had a white male gentile as Prime Minister – i.e., an actual white British person? By my count it looks like Gordon Brown was the last in 2010.
Every subsequent Prime Minister:
David Cameron – part-Jew
Theresa May – woman
Boris Johnson – part-Jew
Liz Truss – woman
Rishi Sunak – Indian
Keir Starmer – white gentile (finally!)
Keir’s a white gentile, right? Except that Keir is (1) married to a Jewess, (2) raising his kids as Jews with whom he (3) regularly attends synagogue. So, it sounds like for all practical intents and purposes Keir is actually a Jew…
The UK is ruled by women and foreigners – mostly Jews. Sad. No wonder it’s going down the shitter.
But the part-Jews like Johnson and Cameron aren’t so bad, right? Wrong: https://www.unz.com/article/steyn-sticks-to-swine/#comment-6369548
He was an immigrationist.
Concerning the defenestration of Johnson, it is notable that two brown skinned subcons – who Johnson very foolish promoted into high cabinet way beyond their intellect and abilities, purely for PC reasons, of course – conspired together to politically assassinate him, so that a brown could sneak himself in as PM and lord it over white Englishmen, the former masters of India. The fact that Johnson is a blond man only intensified their determination to destroy him, and have a paki in charge.
That’s how the pakis think and act. Let that be a warning to you.
In the final analysis, Johnson was just a damned fool, and an immigrationist to boot.
‘Boris is self-aware enough to concede that he is “gaffe-prone,” but, then, he would concede this; it is part of his comic charm and of his cunning: Appear a tad helpless and people will love you. The women will want to mother you, the men won’t see you as a real threat and so will underestimate you, or they’ll believe that they can obtain true power with you as the comic frontman’
Dominic Cummings
May I just add, that he is totally corrupt (speeches fees), though they all are (see Labour/Swift/Lord Alli) and that this kind of corruption is totally acceptable in the UK ever since Churchill’s lifestyle was financed by his Jewish and gentile owners.
And that he has the blood of everyone in Ukraine who dies or got maimed since April 2022 on both sides on his hand.
The real tragedy is that, that he always strived to be a Churchill but totally failed when his moment to become one occurred.
If he had stuck to his alleged libertarian instincts when the Covid Con appeared and just kept the UK on the existing plan, Swedish style, he’d now be regarded as one, and he’d still be firmly in power in a country with £500 bln less debt inhabited by free people.
One more thing: Pascal’s Wager had no big cost. None really, if you intend to live a decent life trying to not harm anyone. The cost and harm of lockdowns or nut zero are enormous though.
But we all know that he is, was and always will be a man of no principle. First and foremost, he is a narcissist who wants to be loved by his peers. And that is easiest if you spend OPM on their pet projects and do their talk. Nut zero was also a, now clearly wrong and failed, strategic bet by him and his lot, reinforced by the nagging of his wife, to garner the green/young vote for the Tories instead of seeing it go to labour, in light of the absence of a meaningful Green party in the UK.
Very predictable. This is because Johnson is absolutely Dutton’s kind of nigga.
These types admire each other a lot within their own hierarchy.
Dutton looks up to Johnson, as a superior rank of plummy voiced twit. Dutton in the heirarchy of plummy voiced twits knows he has to polish Johnson’s boots.
In fact Dutton would tear up all his works on “based science” just to polish Johnson’s boots and declare his allegiance to normie conservatism again if Johnson were interested to be amused in this way.
Why would anyone follow English politics? That’s worse than following American politics.
Although he never saw the inside of a court over it, Lloyd George’s political career was undermined in part by corruption, mainly giving out peerages in return for cash. (There were other factors, like the general decline of the Liberal Party to which Lloyd George belonged.) Churchill’s career was on the back foot in the 1920s and early 1930s, though there was more than one reason for this.
I have always personally referred t0 Boris Johnson as a buttock. Lacking the development to, even be, a complete arse
Mary Beard and Bojo did a talk on “Rome or Greek civilization.” Bojo favored Greek city states over Roman Imperium. Beard preferred Rome.
The discussion is quite good fun but it does suggest that either segment of the British elite look at such things as utility in keeping their own plebs in line rather than anything transcendent. America and Russia are a blind spot for both thinkers. Today both of them take the easy path on what Putin represents.
Video Link
Video Link
He was always Alcibiades actually.