The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 TeasersRussian Reaction Blog
Open Thread 222

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Here’s a new Open Thread for all of you. To minimize the load, please continue to limit your Tweets or place them under a MORE tag.

Also, an excellent discussion of Ukraine by Jeffrey Sachs and Glenn Greenwald:


Video Link

 
• Category: Foreign Policy • Tags: American Military, NATO, Russia, Ukraine 
Hide 1157 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. With Estonia legalizing gay marriage and Poland announcing that it is opening up to mass nonwhite immigration, it is obvious what is in store for Ukraine should they win this war. Doesn’t mean the Ukrainians shouldn’t fight, but we should be honest about the situation

    • Replies: @Yevardian
    @Greasy William


    Poland announcing that it is opening up to mass nonwhite immigration
     
    Source? I see lots of headlines on "record numbers of non EU migrants", but its quite obvious that must be due to Ukrainians, and a few Belarusians.

    Ironically, most effective method for Poland to simultaneously maintain a Slavic supermajority, fill in labour shortages, harm the Russian state whilst winning over ordinary Russians, would be to allow visa-free emigration of skilled Russians to Poland, on condition they work within Poland for at least 5 years.

    But of course PiS Poland is too dimwitted, spiteful and powerless on major policy issues to even think about such a forward thinking move.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @DinduNuffins

    , @Mr. XYZ
    @Greasy William

    Legalizing same-sex marriage is a GOOD thing.

    As for Poland's immigration news, isn't that just fake news?

    BTW, Anatoly Karlin's official statement on the Ukraine War from the very beginning was just pure cringe:

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FMVZGoTXIAYqukn.png

    I mean, think about it: The main thing that the West did was to give Ukrainians the hope that they could be a part of a much larger economy of scale in the form of the EU than they would be if they reunited with Russia. What's so wrong with that?

    , @china-russia-all-the-way
    @Greasy William

    Polish immigration stats in 2022 are surprising. Very brown. How much of this is due to the pressure to conform to the West because of NATO integration?

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fy6qGLTWYAIDG-n?format=jpg&name=medium

    Replies: @AP

    , @Hartnell
    @Greasy William

    Maybe it is what the people in these countries want to become? Liberal and woke? Maybe it doesn't bother them at all about becoming a minority. Maybe it is all about democracy and having a good life they are interested in?

    Of course looking at the West, immigration is ruining the good quality of life but the Slavs, rather then fighting to resist it, seem to be fighting to join it which means maybe they really don't care.

    Replies: @Greasy William

  2. Lets us start the new thread with something Europe has not screwed up.

    The 24 Hours of Le Mans

    Bad news for the Whelen Cadillac immediately after the start. Sometimes motor racing is simply unfair, but… It’s The Same for Everyone

    PEACE 😇

  3. Some of the most shocking first person footage of trench combat from the war:
    https://funker530.com/video/nsfw-russian-soldiers-gunned-down-point-blank-in-trench/

    The Russians are looking pretty clueless. Attacking Ukrainians have most likely been trained by NATO countries. Note that the Ukrainians clearly have better gear.

    Funny how I was called a Jew last year for pointing out that some of the Russians troops didn’t have proper camo or boots. Now there are daily videos of Russian conscripts running out in garage sale looking camo and holding an AK-47 with iron sights.

    EVERYTHING IS GOING AS PLANNED COMRADE

    OUR LORD DWARF PUTIN KNOWS WHAT HE IS DOING

    T-55s and classic AK-47s are all part of a 5D chess plan where Putin makes it look like he is running out of modern equipment.

    GENIUS MOVE DWARF

    • LOL: YetAnotherAnon
    • Replies: @Greasy William
    @John Johnson

    The Russians are a mess, the invasion is evil and Russia is not going to conquer Ukraine, but Russia is clearly winning the war at this time.

    The Ukrainian offensive has failed. Badly. It should never have been launched in the first place and has maybe 2 weeks left before it is formally canceled. There is simply no way to break through the lines of an entrenched, near peer enemy when that same enemy also has air superiority. This offensive was launched solely because the evil Biden regime demanded it, even Zelensky didn't seem to want it.

    You don't need to take my word for it, just read the Western press. The Western press is the propaganda arm of the CIA/Pentagon and they are saying that the offensive is failing and that the Russians are fighting well. This is a sign that they are getting ready to wind the war down. Furthermore, Ukraine has just launched a massive mobilization drive, the broadest one yet. This is likely related to the large losses Ukraine has suffered in this offensive.

    Right now it appears that Russia is planning another Bakhmut style grind to retake Kharkov. Once Kharkov falls, that will be the end. Both sides will agree to a ceasefire in place in exchange for no Ukrainian entry into NATO and the EU, a portion of Russia's frozen overseas funds being used for Ukrainian reconstruction, formal recognition of all Russian conquests as part of the Russian Federation, lifting of the sanctions, a formal Ukrainian commitment to protect the rights of Russian speakers in Ukraine and a commitment that Ukraine will not receive long range weapons or an expansion of its air power. Ukraine will receive official commitments from the West for reconstruction funds and unofficial commitments for military protection in the event that Russia resumes hostilities, in addition to massive amounts of military hardware and assistance building up its defense industry.

    Technically this will be an American victory but practically it will be an American defeat because ending the war will have required some US concessions to Russia. This will prove that the US no longer has the strength to enforce the liberal international order and will thus mark the official end of US hegemony.

    Replies: @Yevardian, @Mr. XYZ, @John Johnson

    , @Fidelios Automata
    @John Johnson

    Wow, didn't know you were still around trolling the good guys. Doesn't matter, Russians are winning, Ukies are losing, and America will fall very soon.

    Replies: @QCIC

    , @Xavier Pendable
    @John Johnson

    No, you're not a Jew... but, you sure are an uninformed troll.

    Have a :) day

  4. Now that Putin has declared that the Russian troops withdrew from Kiev, Sumy and Chernihiv only as part of a failed agreement with the Ukrainian negotiators in Istambul, there are no doubts in my mind that all the regular commenters here who claimed that the pincer attack on Kiev was just a feint will admit their mistake (or call Putin a liar).

    I don’t remember all the names and don’t have the time to search past posts now but you know who you are. Not long ago one of them was trying to convince me that there was no way such a small contingent could be anything but a feint. It was you, QCIC, wasn’t it?

    • Replies: @LondonBob
    @Mikel

    The approach on Kiev was a feint, that forty mile convoy must rank as one the greatest acts of deception in military history. Clever to portray something you were going to do anyway as an act of magnanimity. Meanwhile the crucial land bridge to Crimea was captured.

    , @QCIC
    @Mikel

    I don't think it was me. I had few opinions on tactical actions at that point. More recently I have foolishly made a few tactical comments. I am not a warrior (real or LARP) so my tactical comments are largely based on what I know about military technology. In other cases they are derived from the larger strategic picture or human nature.

    I am mostly a single issue commenter: Let's avoid nuclear WW3.

    Independently of that point, I think this whole mess is an aggression by the West against Russia using Ukraine as a pawn. There is a clear and uncontroversial history from the early 1990s to now which thoroughly makes this case.

    Since this combat is happening directly on the Western border of Russia I think Ukraine inevitably loses unless the outcome is otherwise pre-ordained. The West believed otherwise, probably because they overestimated the power of the economic warfare and the strength of their fifth column inside Russia.

    +++

    I agree that the size of the force applied to Kiev was way too small to do the job, so a diversionary attack seems plausible. I did not understand either of these points at the time, but in retrospect they are both obvious. Yet that cannot be the full story.

    Part of the early Russian forces were clearly inadequately prepared, so I think Russia was rushed into action before they were ready.

    It looks like Putin would have preferred negotiation so the idea that the force was intended as a bluff makes some sense, but not much. I don't think generals do bluffs very well.

    It also looks like there was some faction which foolishly believed attitudes in Kiev were much more favorable toward Russia than they really were. I don't think anyone in these comments would have been confused about this in 2021, so it seems even less likely those in the Kremlin were confused. I wonder if this suggests a very powerful fifth column inside the Kremlin acting as a Judas goat to drag Russia into Ukraine to get her head chopped off financially and militarily?

    Replies: @LondonBob, @Mikel

  5. @Greasy William
    With Estonia legalizing gay marriage and Poland announcing that it is opening up to mass nonwhite immigration, it is obvious what is in store for Ukraine should they win this war. Doesn't mean the Ukrainians shouldn't fight, but we should be honest about the situation

    Replies: @Yevardian, @Mr. XYZ, @china-russia-all-the-way, @Hartnell

    Poland announcing that it is opening up to mass nonwhite immigration

    Source? I see lots of headlines on “record numbers of non EU migrants”, but its quite obvious that must be due to Ukrainians, and a few Belarusians.

    Ironically, most effective method for Poland to simultaneously maintain a Slavic supermajority, fill in labour shortages, harm the Russian state whilst winning over ordinary Russians, would be to allow visa-free emigration of skilled Russians to Poland, on condition they work within Poland for at least 5 years.

    But of course PiS Poland is too dimwitted, spiteful and powerless on major policy issues to even think about such a forward thinking move.

    • Agree: Mr. XYZ
    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @Yevardian


    Ironically, most effective method for Poland to simultaneously maintain a Slavic supermajority, fill in labour shortages, harm the Russian state whilst winning over ordinary Russians, would be to allow visa-free emigration of skilled Russians to Poland, on condition they work within Poland for at least 5 years.
     
    Ukraine can also have a Law of Return, at least for Russians of at least partial Ukrainian descent, but only if they will actually agree to denounce Russia's predatory imperialist war against Ukraine and sign a loyalty oath to Ukraine. I mean, this would be the smart move to do on Ukraine's part. Ukraine is currently pretty poor but won't be so indefinitely and once Ukraine will become an EU member (probably not before the 2030s, but possibly in the 2040s instead) and become wealthier, it could become much more attractive to Russians due to the potential of getting an EU passport.
    , @DinduNuffins
    @Yevardian

    They are all Caucasians. That’s what matters. No Groids.

  6. @John Johnson
    Some of the most shocking first person footage of trench combat from the war:
    https://funker530.com/video/nsfw-russian-soldiers-gunned-down-point-blank-in-trench/

    The Russians are looking pretty clueless. Attacking Ukrainians have most likely been trained by NATO countries. Note that the Ukrainians clearly have better gear.

    Funny how I was called a Jew last year for pointing out that some of the Russians troops didn't have proper camo or boots. Now there are daily videos of Russian conscripts running out in garage sale looking camo and holding an AK-47 with iron sights.

    EVERYTHING IS GOING AS PLANNED COMRADE

    OUR LORD DWARF PUTIN KNOWS WHAT HE IS DOING

    T-55s and classic AK-47s are all part of a 5D chess plan where Putin makes it look like he is running out of modern equipment.

    GENIUS MOVE DWARF

    Replies: @Greasy William, @Fidelios Automata, @Xavier Pendable

    The Russians are a mess, the invasion is evil and Russia is not going to conquer Ukraine, but Russia is clearly winning the war at this time.

    The Ukrainian offensive has failed. Badly. It should never have been launched in the first place and has maybe 2 weeks left before it is formally canceled. There is simply no way to break through the lines of an entrenched, near peer enemy when that same enemy also has air superiority. This offensive was launched solely because the evil Biden regime demanded it, even Zelensky didn’t seem to want it.

    You don’t need to take my word for it, just read the Western press. The Western press is the propaganda arm of the CIA/Pentagon and they are saying that the offensive is failing and that the Russians are fighting well. This is a sign that they are getting ready to wind the war down. Furthermore, Ukraine has just launched a massive mobilization drive, the broadest one yet. This is likely related to the large losses Ukraine has suffered in this offensive.

    Right now it appears that Russia is planning another Bakhmut style grind to retake Kharkov. Once Kharkov falls, that will be the end. Both sides will agree to a ceasefire in place in exchange for no Ukrainian entry into NATO and the EU, a portion of Russia’s frozen overseas funds being used for Ukrainian reconstruction, formal recognition of all Russian conquests as part of the Russian Federation, lifting of the sanctions, a formal Ukrainian commitment to protect the rights of Russian speakers in Ukraine and a commitment that Ukraine will not receive long range weapons or an expansion of its air power. Ukraine will receive official commitments from the West for reconstruction funds and unofficial commitments for military protection in the event that Russia resumes hostilities, in addition to massive amounts of military hardware and assistance building up its defense industry.

    Technically this will be an American victory but practically it will be an American defeat because ending the war will have required some US concessions to Russia. This will prove that the US no longer has the strength to enforce the liberal international order and will thus mark the official end of US hegemony.

    • Replies: @Yevardian
    @Greasy William

    Sir, this might be the first relatively grounded post on foreign affairs I've ever seen from you.

    Replies: @Sean

    , @Mr. XYZ
    @Greasy William

    Ukraine will never agree to give up its EU aspirations and even its NATO aspirations would need to be replaced with an actual viable alternative if they are to ever be given up.

    Replies: @Greasy William, @The Alarmist

    , @John Johnson
    @Greasy William

    The Russians are a mess, the invasion is evil and Russia is not going to conquer Ukraine, but Russia is clearly winning the war at this time.

    The Ukrainian offensive has failed. Badly. It should never have been launched in the first place and has maybe 2 weeks left before it is formally canceled.

    You can't judge an offensive this early. We haven't even seen the full tank force.

    The Nazis took Ukraine in a month and to this day is considered an exceptional military achievement due to a strategic envelopment at Kiev. Historically most offensives in modern warfare run months to years.

    Prigozhin isn't convinced that the Russians can hold. So once again the pro-Putin bloggers are in contradiction with the main general on the ground.

    There is simply no way to break through the lines of an entrenched, near peer enemy when that same enemy also has air superiority.

    There is no air superiority by either side. The Ukrainians have been driving tanks around in broad daylight ever since the war started. The RAF has mostly been a no show. The Ukrainians never had much of an air force but they will be getting over 30 F-16s.

    It should never have been launched in the first place and has maybe 2 weeks left before it is formally canceled

    I think it was launched too early. They never should have announced anything. All that did was direct Russia to build defensive lines. The Nazis made the same mistake with Kursk. Too much of a warning was given.

    But an offensive needed to happen at some point. They can't just sit in defensive lines with Bradleys and Strikers. It makes sense to launch an offensive even if it comes with above average risk. It's not as if their net losses are zero in a defensive position.

    It's clear from the captured Russian POWs that they are scraping the barrel for conscripts. Russia is lying about their losses and continues to send 2 week conscripts to the front. A single breakthrough could cause a major headache for the Russians. Note that Stalingrad was lost because the Russians pushed on weaker Romanian and Italian units that were guarding the rear. We could see a similar breakthrough whereby inexperienced and demoralized conscripts simply flee and allow a massive salient.

    Technically this will be an American victory but practically it will be an American defeat because ending the war will have required some US concessions to Russia.

    Which concessions would those be?

  7. @Greasy William
    @John Johnson

    The Russians are a mess, the invasion is evil and Russia is not going to conquer Ukraine, but Russia is clearly winning the war at this time.

    The Ukrainian offensive has failed. Badly. It should never have been launched in the first place and has maybe 2 weeks left before it is formally canceled. There is simply no way to break through the lines of an entrenched, near peer enemy when that same enemy also has air superiority. This offensive was launched solely because the evil Biden regime demanded it, even Zelensky didn't seem to want it.

    You don't need to take my word for it, just read the Western press. The Western press is the propaganda arm of the CIA/Pentagon and they are saying that the offensive is failing and that the Russians are fighting well. This is a sign that they are getting ready to wind the war down. Furthermore, Ukraine has just launched a massive mobilization drive, the broadest one yet. This is likely related to the large losses Ukraine has suffered in this offensive.

    Right now it appears that Russia is planning another Bakhmut style grind to retake Kharkov. Once Kharkov falls, that will be the end. Both sides will agree to a ceasefire in place in exchange for no Ukrainian entry into NATO and the EU, a portion of Russia's frozen overseas funds being used for Ukrainian reconstruction, formal recognition of all Russian conquests as part of the Russian Federation, lifting of the sanctions, a formal Ukrainian commitment to protect the rights of Russian speakers in Ukraine and a commitment that Ukraine will not receive long range weapons or an expansion of its air power. Ukraine will receive official commitments from the West for reconstruction funds and unofficial commitments for military protection in the event that Russia resumes hostilities, in addition to massive amounts of military hardware and assistance building up its defense industry.

    Technically this will be an American victory but practically it will be an American defeat because ending the war will have required some US concessions to Russia. This will prove that the US no longer has the strength to enforce the liberal international order and will thus mark the official end of US hegemony.

    Replies: @Yevardian, @Mr. XYZ, @John Johnson

    Sir, this might be the first relatively grounded post on foreign affairs I’ve ever seen from you.

    • Replies: @Sean
    @Yevardian


    Ukraine will receive official commitments from the West for reconstruction funds and unofficial commitments for military protection in the event that Russia resumes hostilities
     
    Absolutely ethereal fairy story ending with no connection to the real world . Russia cannot be dissuaded from attacking Ukraine. It could not be in the past and if it does not start attacking Ukraine again in the future that will only be because is never stopped. A hermeneutic narrative is not 'based'. Ltt us be clear, Russia is not asking for a deal, and no one is going to give Ukraine a security guarantee anyway.

    Replies: @Greasy William

  8. @Greasy William
    With Estonia legalizing gay marriage and Poland announcing that it is opening up to mass nonwhite immigration, it is obvious what is in store for Ukraine should they win this war. Doesn't mean the Ukrainians shouldn't fight, but we should be honest about the situation

    Replies: @Yevardian, @Mr. XYZ, @china-russia-all-the-way, @Hartnell

    Legalizing same-sex marriage is a GOOD thing.

    As for Poland’s immigration news, isn’t that just fake news?

    BTW, Anatoly Karlin’s official statement on the Ukraine War from the very beginning was just pure cringe:

    I mean, think about it: The main thing that the West did was to give Ukrainians the hope that they could be a part of a much larger economy of scale in the form of the EU than they would be if they reunited with Russia. What’s so wrong with that?

  9. @Yevardian
    @Greasy William


    Poland announcing that it is opening up to mass nonwhite immigration
     
    Source? I see lots of headlines on "record numbers of non EU migrants", but its quite obvious that must be due to Ukrainians, and a few Belarusians.

    Ironically, most effective method for Poland to simultaneously maintain a Slavic supermajority, fill in labour shortages, harm the Russian state whilst winning over ordinary Russians, would be to allow visa-free emigration of skilled Russians to Poland, on condition they work within Poland for at least 5 years.

    But of course PiS Poland is too dimwitted, spiteful and powerless on major policy issues to even think about such a forward thinking move.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @DinduNuffins

    Ironically, most effective method for Poland to simultaneously maintain a Slavic supermajority, fill in labour shortages, harm the Russian state whilst winning over ordinary Russians, would be to allow visa-free emigration of skilled Russians to Poland, on condition they work within Poland for at least 5 years.

    Ukraine can also have a Law of Return, at least for Russians of at least partial Ukrainian descent, but only if they will actually agree to denounce Russia’s predatory imperialist war against Ukraine and sign a loyalty oath to Ukraine. I mean, this would be the smart move to do on Ukraine’s part. Ukraine is currently pretty poor but won’t be so indefinitely and once Ukraine will become an EU member (probably not before the 2030s, but possibly in the 2040s instead) and become wealthier, it could become much more attractive to Russians due to the potential of getting an EU passport.

    • LOL: RadicalCenter
  10. @Greasy William
    @John Johnson

    The Russians are a mess, the invasion is evil and Russia is not going to conquer Ukraine, but Russia is clearly winning the war at this time.

    The Ukrainian offensive has failed. Badly. It should never have been launched in the first place and has maybe 2 weeks left before it is formally canceled. There is simply no way to break through the lines of an entrenched, near peer enemy when that same enemy also has air superiority. This offensive was launched solely because the evil Biden regime demanded it, even Zelensky didn't seem to want it.

    You don't need to take my word for it, just read the Western press. The Western press is the propaganda arm of the CIA/Pentagon and they are saying that the offensive is failing and that the Russians are fighting well. This is a sign that they are getting ready to wind the war down. Furthermore, Ukraine has just launched a massive mobilization drive, the broadest one yet. This is likely related to the large losses Ukraine has suffered in this offensive.

    Right now it appears that Russia is planning another Bakhmut style grind to retake Kharkov. Once Kharkov falls, that will be the end. Both sides will agree to a ceasefire in place in exchange for no Ukrainian entry into NATO and the EU, a portion of Russia's frozen overseas funds being used for Ukrainian reconstruction, formal recognition of all Russian conquests as part of the Russian Federation, lifting of the sanctions, a formal Ukrainian commitment to protect the rights of Russian speakers in Ukraine and a commitment that Ukraine will not receive long range weapons or an expansion of its air power. Ukraine will receive official commitments from the West for reconstruction funds and unofficial commitments for military protection in the event that Russia resumes hostilities, in addition to massive amounts of military hardware and assistance building up its defense industry.

    Technically this will be an American victory but practically it will be an American defeat because ending the war will have required some US concessions to Russia. This will prove that the US no longer has the strength to enforce the liberal international order and will thus mark the official end of US hegemony.

    Replies: @Yevardian, @Mr. XYZ, @John Johnson

    Ukraine will never agree to give up its EU aspirations and even its NATO aspirations would need to be replaced with an actual viable alternative if they are to ever be given up.

    • Replies: @Greasy William
    @Mr. XYZ

    Ukraine will sign whatever the US tells them to sign. They will be given some sort of unofficial EU partnership but will also have to agree to some degree of economic integration with Russia

    Re gay marriage: In and of itself, I don't care if governments recognize gay marriage or not. But we all know that gay marriage is always and everywhere merely part of a larger globohomo agenda

    , @The Alarmist
    @Mr. XYZ


    Ukraine will never agree to give up its EU aspirations ....
     
    You assume there will still be an EU worth joining, much less anything more than a rump state of 404.

    The West and the USA are in no position to force Russia to do anything.

    Replies: @Miro23, @Mr. XYZ

  11. @Mr. XYZ
    @Greasy William

    Ukraine will never agree to give up its EU aspirations and even its NATO aspirations would need to be replaced with an actual viable alternative if they are to ever be given up.

    Replies: @Greasy William, @The Alarmist

    Ukraine will sign whatever the US tells them to sign. They will be given some sort of unofficial EU partnership but will also have to agree to some degree of economic integration with Russia

    Re gay marriage: In and of itself, I don’t care if governments recognize gay marriage or not. But we all know that gay marriage is always and everywhere merely part of a larger globohomo agenda

  12. @Yevardian
    @Greasy William

    Sir, this might be the first relatively grounded post on foreign affairs I've ever seen from you.

    Replies: @Sean

    Ukraine will receive official commitments from the West for reconstruction funds and unofficial commitments for military protection in the event that Russia resumes hostilities

    Absolutely ethereal fairy story ending with no connection to the real world . Russia cannot be dissuaded from attacking Ukraine. It could not be in the past and if it does not start attacking Ukraine again in the future that will only be because is never stopped. A hermeneutic narrative is not ‘based’. Ltt us be clear, Russia is not asking for a deal, and no one is going to give Ukraine a security guarantee anyway.

    • Replies: @Greasy William
    @Sean

    Russia is not asking for a deal. That's correct. However, eventually the West is going to force Russia to make a choice: allow Ukraine to continue to exist, albeit in substantially shrunken borders... or WWIII. Nothing else is possible. The West will stop at nothing to prevent Russia from dismantling the Ukrainian state.

    Replies: @A123, @Lurker

  13. @Sean
    @Yevardian


    Ukraine will receive official commitments from the West for reconstruction funds and unofficial commitments for military protection in the event that Russia resumes hostilities
     
    Absolutely ethereal fairy story ending with no connection to the real world . Russia cannot be dissuaded from attacking Ukraine. It could not be in the past and if it does not start attacking Ukraine again in the future that will only be because is never stopped. A hermeneutic narrative is not 'based'. Ltt us be clear, Russia is not asking for a deal, and no one is going to give Ukraine a security guarantee anyway.

    Replies: @Greasy William

    Russia is not asking for a deal. That’s correct. However, eventually the West is going to force Russia to make a choice: allow Ukraine to continue to exist, albeit in substantially shrunken borders… or WWIII. Nothing else is possible. The West will stop at nothing to prevent Russia from dismantling the Ukrainian state.

    • Disagree: RadicalCenter
    • Replies: @A123
    @Greasy William


    The West will stop at nothing to prevent Russia from dismantling the Ukrainian state.
     
    The U.S. is headed into an election season, no one really cares about Ukraine, and the 🇺🇦fad🇺🇦 is ending. One hears more about boycotts against Target and Bud Light versus a fight thousands of miles away where America has nothing at stake.

    With the U.S. out, what do you mean by "The West"? Parts of Europe? Which parts? The issue of immigration is becoming more tense across the continent. Sending Ukrainians back to Ukraine is thus desirable for a number of European countries.

    The two realistic possibilities for Ukraine are:

    -1- Capitulating to become a lesser state, military limitations, no NATO, etc.
    -2- Total leadership collapse yielding a failed state

    The idea that Germany and France will ride to the rescue is tragically misguided. If anything, they are secretly pushing for #2.

    PEACE 😇

    , @Lurker
    @Greasy William

    I'm not sure the West is in a position to be forcing Russia to do stuff now.

  14. @Mikel
    Now that Putin has declared that the Russian troops withdrew from Kiev, Sumy and Chernihiv only as part of a failed agreement with the Ukrainian negotiators in Istambul, there are no doubts in my mind that all the regular commenters here who claimed that the pincer attack on Kiev was just a feint will admit their mistake (or call Putin a liar).

    I don't remember all the names and don't have the time to search past posts now but you know who you are. Not long ago one of them was trying to convince me that there was no way such a small contingent could be anything but a feint. It was you, QCIC, wasn't it?

    Replies: @LondonBob, @QCIC

    The approach on Kiev was a feint, that forty mile convoy must rank as one the greatest acts of deception in military history. Clever to portray something you were going to do anyway as an act of magnanimity. Meanwhile the crucial land bridge to Crimea was captured.

    • LOL: Matra, Mikel
  15. @Mr. XYZ
    @Greasy William

    Ukraine will never agree to give up its EU aspirations and even its NATO aspirations would need to be replaced with an actual viable alternative if they are to ever be given up.

    Replies: @Greasy William, @The Alarmist

    Ukraine will never agree to give up its EU aspirations ….

    You assume there will still be an EU worth joining, much less anything more than a rump state of 404.

    The West and the USA are in no position to force Russia to do anything.

    • Agree: RadicalCenter
    • Disagree: Mr. XYZ
    • Replies: @Miro23
    @The Alarmist



    Ukraine will never agree to give up its EU aspirations ….
     
    You assume there will still be an EU worth joining, much less anything more than a rump state of 404.
    The West and the USA are in no position to force Russia to do anything.
     
    On present trends, Ukraine returns to Russian control. The EU (same as the US) falls apart politically and economically under unpayable debts and unaffordable welfare states.

    Both the US and the UK have evolved into a hopeless mess since the 1980's.
    , @Mr. XYZ
    @The Alarmist

    The EU will need an awful lot more Muslims and Africans for it to stop being attractive. The US's tens of millions of African-Americans have not been enough to ruin the US's appeal and attraction, just so long as one will stay out of areas that have a large African-American presence.

  16. A123 says: • Website

    Yet more on why establishment DeNeocon is losing to MAGA Trump: (1)

    CTH has said for a year the Achilles heel Ron DeSantis carries, the weak spot that outlines his neocon nature, becomes extremely visible on the subject of Ukraine.

    Twice previously, DeSantis has tried to walk the tightrope and navigate his lies surrounding the Ukraine war. Each time he outlines something that leans toward Ukraine needing to concede to Russia and NATO needing to stop meddling on Russia borders, he immediately walks back his comments. DeSantis is stuck on the issue of Ukraine because DeSantis cannot be honest about his position on Ukraine.

    Today in South Carolina [Forbes got the state wrong in the title] the issue of Ukraine surfaced in a public Q&A (video below), and both times DeSantis ducked, obfuscated, distracted and refused to answer the question. The second person asked more directly, “What are you going to do about the war in Ukraine?”, because DeSantis never answered the first questioner. WATCH [prompted to 01:08:23]

    Only Donald Trump has the solution to the Ukraine war. (1) Stop NATO, namely U.S. created, from provoking nonsense antagonisms on Russia’s border; and (2) Force Zelenskyy to the negotiation table of reality. The Ukraine war stops immediately the day after the 2024 election, if Trump wins.

    However, Ron DeSantis cannot take that attitude or foreign policy approach. DeSantis must maintain the approved Republican pro-war narrative as outlined by Democrats, Republicans, UniParty, and the DC political leadership writ large.

    Yes… the part “stops immediately the day after the 2024 election” is obvious exaggeration for humor value. One of the key ways to tell Democrats from Republicans is — DNC supporters are incapable of humor and will declare jokes to be “micro aggressions”.

    If DeSantis is smart, he will drop out of the GOP primary sooner rather than later. Being the governor of Florida is a full time job. And, he is only hurting himself with this anti-MAGA run that cannot succeed.

    PEACE 😇
    __________

    (1) https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2023/06/22/asked-again-twice-about-ukraine-ron-desantis-ducks-weaves-and-avoids-the-question-at-a-certain-point-the-neocon-cannot-hide/

    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @A123


    If DeSantis is smart, he will drop out of the GOP primary sooner rather than later. Being the governor of Florida is a full time job. And, he is only hurting himself with this anti-MAGA run that cannot succeed.
     
    Perhaps, but only if Trump can find the time to run for the presidency while battling all of his felony charges in court:

    https://arc-anglerfish-washpost-prod-washpost.s3.amazonaws.com/public/RNIT2JI7B5EOZFGUUYIOSLTD3E.jpg

    Replies: @RadicalCenter

  17. A123 says: • Website
    @Greasy William
    @Sean

    Russia is not asking for a deal. That's correct. However, eventually the West is going to force Russia to make a choice: allow Ukraine to continue to exist, albeit in substantially shrunken borders... or WWIII. Nothing else is possible. The West will stop at nothing to prevent Russia from dismantling the Ukrainian state.

    Replies: @A123, @Lurker

    The West will stop at nothing to prevent Russia from dismantling the Ukrainian state.

    The U.S. is headed into an election season, no one really cares about Ukraine, and the 🇺🇦fad🇺🇦 is ending. One hears more about boycotts against Target and Bud Light versus a fight thousands of miles away where America has nothing at stake.

    With the U.S. out, what do you mean by “The West”? Parts of Europe? Which parts? The issue of immigration is becoming more tense across the continent. Sending Ukrainians back to Ukraine is thus desirable for a number of European countries.

    The two realistic possibilities for Ukraine are:

    -1- Capitulating to become a lesser state, military limitations, no NATO, etc.
    -2- Total leadership collapse yielding a failed state

    The idea that Germany and France will ride to the rescue is tragically misguided. If anything, they are secretly pushing for #2.

    PEACE 😇

  18. @Yevardian
    @Greasy William


    Poland announcing that it is opening up to mass nonwhite immigration
     
    Source? I see lots of headlines on "record numbers of non EU migrants", but its quite obvious that must be due to Ukrainians, and a few Belarusians.

    Ironically, most effective method for Poland to simultaneously maintain a Slavic supermajority, fill in labour shortages, harm the Russian state whilst winning over ordinary Russians, would be to allow visa-free emigration of skilled Russians to Poland, on condition they work within Poland for at least 5 years.

    But of course PiS Poland is too dimwitted, spiteful and powerless on major policy issues to even think about such a forward thinking move.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @DinduNuffins

    They are all Caucasians. That’s what matters. No Groids.

  19. @John Johnson
    Some of the most shocking first person footage of trench combat from the war:
    https://funker530.com/video/nsfw-russian-soldiers-gunned-down-point-blank-in-trench/

    The Russians are looking pretty clueless. Attacking Ukrainians have most likely been trained by NATO countries. Note that the Ukrainians clearly have better gear.

    Funny how I was called a Jew last year for pointing out that some of the Russians troops didn't have proper camo or boots. Now there are daily videos of Russian conscripts running out in garage sale looking camo and holding an AK-47 with iron sights.

    EVERYTHING IS GOING AS PLANNED COMRADE

    OUR LORD DWARF PUTIN KNOWS WHAT HE IS DOING

    T-55s and classic AK-47s are all part of a 5D chess plan where Putin makes it look like he is running out of modern equipment.

    GENIUS MOVE DWARF

    Replies: @Greasy William, @Fidelios Automata, @Xavier Pendable

    Wow, didn’t know you were still around trolling the good guys. Doesn’t matter, Russians are winning, Ukies are losing, and America will fall very soon.

    • Replies: @QCIC
    @Fidelios Automata

    Russia doesn't want America to fall any more than America wants China to fall.

  20. Putin Says Hohols Have Ceased Major “Offensive” Operations, Realize They Are Doomed Pups

    The Ukrainian offensive has failed. Badly. It should never have been launched in the first place and has maybe 2 weeks left before it is formally canceled. There is simply no way to break through the lines of an entrenched, near peer enemy when that same enemy also has air superiority.

    The two realistic possibilities for Ukraine are:

    -1- Capitulating to become a lesser state, military limitations, no NATO, etc.
    -2- Total leadership collapse yielding a failed state

    All of you sound crazy and even support from our erudite blog cheerleader Yevardian doesn’t seem to help your gloomy and incoherent prognosis. I carefully watch this war, and see Ukraine steadily chipping away at Russian controlled territory. At least 15 small towns have been retaken. Small progress daily, step by step. And you Greasy William, who thinks that you’ve really discovered something new and important:

    There is simply no way to break through the lines of an entrenched, near peer enemy when that same enemy also has air superiority.

    The Ukrainian military is aware of this profound wisdom, and rarely if ever attacks head on. The modus operandi for the counter attack is going around the entrenched defensive lines and attacking (and winning) from the rear. Here’s the official US Defense Department’s stance on the counter insurgency in Ukraine, something that should b read by everybody who has a serious interest in this war, published less than 24 hours ago:

    https://www.defense.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/Article/3436312/official-says-ukraine-well-prepared-to-liberate-russian-occupied-territory/

    • Replies: @QCIC
    @Mr. Hack

    The best case for Russia is to keep fighting until Ukraine throws off her Western puppet masters. This may take a long time. Once Ukraine does this Russia will have more respect for Ukraine than the West does.

    In the meantime Russia will keep grinding away and gradually laying the groundwork for post-SMO civilization in Ukraine.

    At some point either Kharkov or Dnipro will capitulate. Once that happens I think everything East of the river will follow suit. It will be interesting to see if Kiev stays the course or gives in at that point.

    Have we reached the point where reasonable Ukrainophile nationalists are fighting against their own puppet government, foreign mercs and NeoNAZIs? I think this must happen before the conflict resolves.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

  21. @A123
    Yet more on why establishment DeNeocon is losing to MAGA Trump: (1)

    CTH has said for a year the Achilles heel Ron DeSantis carries, the weak spot that outlines his neocon nature, becomes extremely visible on the subject of Ukraine.

    Twice previously, DeSantis has tried to walk the tightrope and navigate his lies surrounding the Ukraine war. Each time he outlines something that leans toward Ukraine needing to concede to Russia and NATO needing to stop meddling on Russia borders, he immediately walks back his comments. DeSantis is stuck on the issue of Ukraine because DeSantis cannot be honest about his position on Ukraine.

    Today in South Carolina [Forbes got the state wrong in the title] the issue of Ukraine surfaced in a public Q&A (video below), and both times DeSantis ducked, obfuscated, distracted and refused to answer the question. The second person asked more directly, “What are you going to do about the war in Ukraine?”, because DeSantis never answered the first questioner. WATCH [prompted to 01:08:23]

    https://youtu.be/KogyF4W6b6c

    Only Donald Trump has the solution to the Ukraine war. (1) Stop NATO, namely U.S. created, from provoking nonsense antagonisms on Russia’s border; and (2) Force Zelenskyy to the negotiation table of reality. The Ukraine war stops immediately the day after the 2024 election, if Trump wins.

    However, Ron DeSantis cannot take that attitude or foreign policy approach. DeSantis must maintain the approved Republican pro-war narrative as outlined by Democrats, Republicans, UniParty, and the DC political leadership writ large.
     
    Yes... the part "stops immediately the day after the 2024 election" is obvious exaggeration for humor value. One of the key ways to tell Democrats from Republicans is -- DNC supporters are incapable of humor and will declare jokes to be "micro aggressions".

    If DeSantis is smart, he will drop out of the GOP primary sooner rather than later. Being the governor of Florida is a full time job. And, he is only hurting himself with this anti-MAGA run that cannot succeed.

    PEACE 😇
    __________

    (1) https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2023/06/22/asked-again-twice-about-ukraine-ron-desantis-ducks-weaves-and-avoids-the-question-at-a-certain-point-the-neocon-cannot-hide/

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

    If DeSantis is smart, he will drop out of the GOP primary sooner rather than later. Being the governor of Florida is a full time job. And, he is only hurting himself with this anti-MAGA run that cannot succeed.

    Perhaps, but only if Trump can find the time to run for the presidency while battling all of his felony charges in court:

    • Replies: @RadicalCenter
    @Mr. Hack

    Trump could probably win the republican nomination without campaigning at all.

    Doesn't matter too much because he'll either be defrauded out of a general-election win again, or squeak back into office and make no drastic changes to our path towards financial insolvency, a surveillance/police state, and mass disorder and poverty.

  22. @Mr. Hack

    Putin Says Hohols Have Ceased Major “Offensive” Operations, Realize They Are Doomed Pups
     

    The Ukrainian offensive has failed. Badly. It should never have been launched in the first place and has maybe 2 weeks left before it is formally canceled. There is simply no way to break through the lines of an entrenched, near peer enemy when that same enemy also has air superiority.

     


    The two realistic possibilities for Ukraine are:

    -1- Capitulating to become a lesser state, military limitations, no NATO, etc.
    -2- Total leadership collapse yielding a failed state

     

    All of you sound crazy and even support from our erudite blog cheerleader Yevardian doesn't seem to help your gloomy and incoherent prognosis. I carefully watch this war, and see Ukraine steadily chipping away at Russian controlled territory. At least 15 small towns have been retaken. Small progress daily, step by step. And you Greasy William, who thinks that you've really discovered something new and important:

    There is simply no way to break through the lines of an entrenched, near peer enemy when that same enemy also has air superiority.
     
    The Ukrainian military is aware of this profound wisdom, and rarely if ever attacks head on. The modus operandi for the counter attack is going around the entrenched defensive lines and attacking (and winning) from the rear. Here's the official US Defense Department's stance on the counter insurgency in Ukraine, something that should b read by everybody who has a serious interest in this war, published less than 24 hours ago:

    https://www.defense.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/Article/3436312/official-says-ukraine-well-prepared-to-liberate-russian-occupied-territory/

    Replies: @QCIC

    The best case for Russia is to keep fighting until Ukraine throws off her Western puppet masters. This may take a long time. Once Ukraine does this Russia will have more respect for Ukraine than the West does.

    In the meantime Russia will keep grinding away and gradually laying the groundwork for post-SMO civilization in Ukraine.

    At some point either Kharkov or Dnipro will capitulate. Once that happens I think everything East of the river will follow suit. It will be interesting to see if Kiev stays the course or gives in at that point.

    Have we reached the point where reasonable Ukrainophile nationalists are fighting against their own puppet government, foreign mercs and NeoNAZIs? I think this must happen before the conflict resolves.

    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @QCIC


    Once Ukraine does this Russia will have more respect for Ukraine than the West does.
     
    Russian respect for Ukraine and its borders is clear for the world to see right now. Apparently, you've been looking at the world with closed eyes. "Russian respect" shown for Ukraine and its citizens in Sovierodonetsk, Luhansk:
    https://www.deccanherald.com/sites/dh/files/gallery_images/2022/04/21/Ukraine%20war%20photos%20%281%29.jpg

    At some point either Kharkov or Dnipro will capitulate. Once that happens I think everything East of the river will follow suit.
     
    So far the Russian military has failed to to take both cities, and has failed miserably. The Ukrainian military, since then, has been able to solidly reinforce its presence in these cities. New Patriot systems have been set-up, so Russia's chances at destroying or taking these towns is close to nill.

    Replies: @QCIC

  23. china-russia-all-the-way says:
    @Greasy William
    With Estonia legalizing gay marriage and Poland announcing that it is opening up to mass nonwhite immigration, it is obvious what is in store for Ukraine should they win this war. Doesn't mean the Ukrainians shouldn't fight, but we should be honest about the situation

    Replies: @Yevardian, @Mr. XYZ, @china-russia-all-the-way, @Hartnell

    Polish immigration stats in 2022 are surprising. Very brown. How much of this is due to the pressure to conform to the West because of NATO integration?

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fy6qGLTWYAIDG-n?format=jpg&name=medium

    • Replies: @AP
    @china-russia-all-the-way

    Poles say the chart is fake and the numbers don’t match the actual government stats.

    Furthermore, the chart (which may be fake) is about work permits, not immigration. I suspect people overstaying their visas would be more likely to move west to Germany then to stay illegally in Poland.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Mr. XYZ

  24. @Mikel
    Now that Putin has declared that the Russian troops withdrew from Kiev, Sumy and Chernihiv only as part of a failed agreement with the Ukrainian negotiators in Istambul, there are no doubts in my mind that all the regular commenters here who claimed that the pincer attack on Kiev was just a feint will admit their mistake (or call Putin a liar).

    I don't remember all the names and don't have the time to search past posts now but you know who you are. Not long ago one of them was trying to convince me that there was no way such a small contingent could be anything but a feint. It was you, QCIC, wasn't it?

    Replies: @LondonBob, @QCIC

    I don’t think it was me. I had few opinions on tactical actions at that point. More recently I have foolishly made a few tactical comments. I am not a warrior (real or LARP) so my tactical comments are largely based on what I know about military technology. In other cases they are derived from the larger strategic picture or human nature.

    I am mostly a single issue commenter: Let’s avoid nuclear WW3.

    Independently of that point, I think this whole mess is an aggression by the West against Russia using Ukraine as a pawn. There is a clear and uncontroversial history from the early 1990s to now which thoroughly makes this case.

    Since this combat is happening directly on the Western border of Russia I think Ukraine inevitably loses unless the outcome is otherwise pre-ordained. The West believed otherwise, probably because they overestimated the power of the economic warfare and the strength of their fifth column inside Russia.

    +++

    I agree that the size of the force applied to Kiev was way too small to do the job, so a diversionary attack seems plausible. I did not understand either of these points at the time, but in retrospect they are both obvious. Yet that cannot be the full story.

    Part of the early Russian forces were clearly inadequately prepared, so I think Russia was rushed into action before they were ready.

    It looks like Putin would have preferred negotiation so the idea that the force was intended as a bluff makes some sense, but not much. I don’t think generals do bluffs very well.

    It also looks like there was some faction which foolishly believed attitudes in Kiev were much more favorable toward Russia than they really were. I don’t think anyone in these comments would have been confused about this in 2021, so it seems even less likely those in the Kremlin were confused. I wonder if this suggests a very powerful fifth column inside the Kremlin acting as a Judas goat to drag Russia into Ukraine to get her head chopped off financially and militarily?

    • Replies: @LondonBob
    @QCIC

    Absent the Biden White House I think a deal would have been struck in Istanbul, it was the ideological nutjobs in the West the Kremlin misjudged. Although this has inadvertently been a stroke of luck, Russia will be far more successful now than if a quick deal would have delivered.

    I don't see any serious military analyst suggest Russia actually intended to capture Kiev with a mere 40k, except the usual suspects engaged in propaganda, and whose record demonstrates that.

    The legendary Marine Corps General Paul Van Riper wrote the definitive analysis.

    https://imetatronink.substack.com/p/a-former-us-marine-corps-officershtml

    Replies: @QCIC, @Mikel

    , @Mikel
    @QCIC


    I don’t think it was me.
     
    Yes, sorry. That was AnonfromTN. I remember now.

    As for the Russian contingent in Belarus and Southern Russia being too small to take Kiev, that is easy to say after the fact but the Pentagon had perfect information of what forces were ready for the invasion and their assessment was that it would take them a matter of days to take Kiev (96 hours iirc). With competent planning and logistics, superior technology, suppression of air defenses and C+C centers in the first hours of the offensive, it was a realistic assessment. That's how the Pentagon itself had successfully carried out similar operations in recent years, much further away from its frontiers. The Russians failed at every single one of those objectives though. Kabul didn't fall because of the large amount of US troops sent there at all.

    Replies: @QCIC

  25. @Fidelios Automata
    @John Johnson

    Wow, didn't know you were still around trolling the good guys. Doesn't matter, Russians are winning, Ukies are losing, and America will fall very soon.

    Replies: @QCIC

    Russia doesn’t want America to fall any more than America wants China to fall.

  26. @QCIC
    @Mikel

    I don't think it was me. I had few opinions on tactical actions at that point. More recently I have foolishly made a few tactical comments. I am not a warrior (real or LARP) so my tactical comments are largely based on what I know about military technology. In other cases they are derived from the larger strategic picture or human nature.

    I am mostly a single issue commenter: Let's avoid nuclear WW3.

    Independently of that point, I think this whole mess is an aggression by the West against Russia using Ukraine as a pawn. There is a clear and uncontroversial history from the early 1990s to now which thoroughly makes this case.

    Since this combat is happening directly on the Western border of Russia I think Ukraine inevitably loses unless the outcome is otherwise pre-ordained. The West believed otherwise, probably because they overestimated the power of the economic warfare and the strength of their fifth column inside Russia.

    +++

    I agree that the size of the force applied to Kiev was way too small to do the job, so a diversionary attack seems plausible. I did not understand either of these points at the time, but in retrospect they are both obvious. Yet that cannot be the full story.

    Part of the early Russian forces were clearly inadequately prepared, so I think Russia was rushed into action before they were ready.

    It looks like Putin would have preferred negotiation so the idea that the force was intended as a bluff makes some sense, but not much. I don't think generals do bluffs very well.

    It also looks like there was some faction which foolishly believed attitudes in Kiev were much more favorable toward Russia than they really were. I don't think anyone in these comments would have been confused about this in 2021, so it seems even less likely those in the Kremlin were confused. I wonder if this suggests a very powerful fifth column inside the Kremlin acting as a Judas goat to drag Russia into Ukraine to get her head chopped off financially and militarily?

    Replies: @LondonBob, @Mikel

    Absent the Biden White House I think a deal would have been struck in Istanbul, it was the ideological nutjobs in the West the Kremlin misjudged. Although this has inadvertently been a stroke of luck, Russia will be far more successful now than if a quick deal would have delivered.

    I don’t see any serious military analyst suggest Russia actually intended to capture Kiev with a mere 40k, except the usual suspects engaged in propaganda, and whose record demonstrates that.

    The legendary Marine Corps General Paul Van Riper wrote the definitive analysis.

    https://imetatronink.substack.com/p/a-former-us-marine-corps-officershtml

    • Thanks: QCIC
    • Replies: @QCIC
    @LondonBob

    I think the Russians knew that an imperfect deal was better than losing half a million Slavic young men, but that choice apparently was not up to them. They will try to make lemonade out of their lemons, but who knows how things will go?

    I can't guess which course (SMO or early treaty) would have made WW3 less likely. I don't see how Ukraine would have behaved after an early negotiated settlement. Maybe Russia didn't expect that either and simply wanted more time to win the hearts and minds but also continue military and economic preparations. Minsk II was probably similar. Sure it was a deal they accepted and supported, but there was little chance the West or Ukraine would abide by it.

    , @Mikel
    @LondonBob


    I don’t see any serious military analyst suggest Russia actually intended to capture Kiev with a mere 40k, except the usual suspects engaged in propaganda
     
    You have that exactly backwards. Everybody knew in almost minute detail what forces were amassed north of Ukraine, which is why there were several months of negotiations to prevent the attack, and everybody (Western, Russian and pro-Russian analysts) was convinced that Kiev would fall within days of the invasion. We were all discussing that here a year and a half ago. How can you expect people to forget such recent events?

    The Russians actually managed to get to the outskirts of Kiev from 2-3 different directions. They got to about 20-30 km from the city center. But their armored columns proved to be easy prey for the Ukrainian defenders and they failed to establish air supremacy or decapitate the state and military structures of the enemy so they were losing their best soldiers in the Kiev attack. The idea that the Russians got so close to Kiev at so much risk and loss to themselves but never intended to take it is clownish.

    Replies: @Matra, @LondonBob

  27. @The Alarmist
    @Mr. XYZ


    Ukraine will never agree to give up its EU aspirations ....
     
    You assume there will still be an EU worth joining, much less anything more than a rump state of 404.

    The West and the USA are in no position to force Russia to do anything.

    Replies: @Miro23, @Mr. XYZ

    Ukraine will never agree to give up its EU aspirations ….

    You assume there will still be an EU worth joining, much less anything more than a rump state of 404.
    The West and the USA are in no position to force Russia to do anything.

    On present trends, Ukraine returns to Russian control. The EU (same as the US) falls apart politically and economically under unpayable debts and unaffordable welfare states.

    Both the US and the UK have evolved into a hopeless mess since the 1980’s.

    • Disagree: Mr. Hack, Mr. XYZ
  28. @QCIC
    @Mr. Hack

    The best case for Russia is to keep fighting until Ukraine throws off her Western puppet masters. This may take a long time. Once Ukraine does this Russia will have more respect for Ukraine than the West does.

    In the meantime Russia will keep grinding away and gradually laying the groundwork for post-SMO civilization in Ukraine.

    At some point either Kharkov or Dnipro will capitulate. Once that happens I think everything East of the river will follow suit. It will be interesting to see if Kiev stays the course or gives in at that point.

    Have we reached the point where reasonable Ukrainophile nationalists are fighting against their own puppet government, foreign mercs and NeoNAZIs? I think this must happen before the conflict resolves.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

    Once Ukraine does this Russia will have more respect for Ukraine than the West does.

    Russian respect for Ukraine and its borders is clear for the world to see right now. Apparently, you’ve been looking at the world with closed eyes. “Russian respect” shown for Ukraine and its citizens in Sovierodonetsk, Luhansk:

    At some point either Kharkov or Dnipro will capitulate. Once that happens I think everything East of the river will follow suit.

    So far the Russian military has failed to to take both cities, and has failed miserably. The Ukrainian military, since then, has been able to solidly reinforce its presence in these cities. New Patriot systems have been set-up, so Russia’s chances at destroying or taking these towns is close to nill.

    • Replies: @QCIC
    @Mr. Hack

    Ukraine is a pawn of the West, but a pawn can still be dangerous and Russia had to deal with it. When this is over Russia will help rebuild parts of Ukraine. Many Russians will eventually understand the bigger Cold War picture and hold the West accountable for this tragedy. The combatants and their survivors will not be so forgiving of Ukrainians. Such is war.

    War is hell and best avoided. Ukraine was manipulated by the West, but some Ukrainians made a choice and all are now paying for it.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @John Johnson

  29. @LondonBob
    @QCIC

    Absent the Biden White House I think a deal would have been struck in Istanbul, it was the ideological nutjobs in the West the Kremlin misjudged. Although this has inadvertently been a stroke of luck, Russia will be far more successful now than if a quick deal would have delivered.

    I don't see any serious military analyst suggest Russia actually intended to capture Kiev with a mere 40k, except the usual suspects engaged in propaganda, and whose record demonstrates that.

    The legendary Marine Corps General Paul Van Riper wrote the definitive analysis.

    https://imetatronink.substack.com/p/a-former-us-marine-corps-officershtml

    Replies: @QCIC, @Mikel

    I think the Russians knew that an imperfect deal was better than losing half a million Slavic young men, but that choice apparently was not up to them. They will try to make lemonade out of their lemons, but who knows how things will go?

    I can’t guess which course (SMO or early treaty) would have made WW3 less likely. I don’t see how Ukraine would have behaved after an early negotiated settlement. Maybe Russia didn’t expect that either and simply wanted more time to win the hearts and minds but also continue military and economic preparations. Minsk II was probably similar. Sure it was a deal they accepted and supported, but there was little chance the West or Ukraine would abide by it.

    • Agree: RadicalCenter
  30. @Mr. Hack
    @QCIC


    Once Ukraine does this Russia will have more respect for Ukraine than the West does.
     
    Russian respect for Ukraine and its borders is clear for the world to see right now. Apparently, you've been looking at the world with closed eyes. "Russian respect" shown for Ukraine and its citizens in Sovierodonetsk, Luhansk:
    https://www.deccanherald.com/sites/dh/files/gallery_images/2022/04/21/Ukraine%20war%20photos%20%281%29.jpg

    At some point either Kharkov or Dnipro will capitulate. Once that happens I think everything East of the river will follow suit.
     
    So far the Russian military has failed to to take both cities, and has failed miserably. The Ukrainian military, since then, has been able to solidly reinforce its presence in these cities. New Patriot systems have been set-up, so Russia's chances at destroying or taking these towns is close to nill.

    Replies: @QCIC

    Ukraine is a pawn of the West, but a pawn can still be dangerous and Russia had to deal with it. When this is over Russia will help rebuild parts of Ukraine. Many Russians will eventually understand the bigger Cold War picture and hold the West accountable for this tragedy. The combatants and their survivors will not be so forgiving of Ukrainians. Such is war.

    War is hell and best avoided. Ukraine was manipulated by the West, but some Ukrainians made a choice and all are now paying for it.

    • Agree: RadicalCenter
    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @QCIC

    A typical appeaser line. Better to be a pawn of the West, than one for a loser state like RusFed.

    BTW, are you an American?

    https://cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/advancelocal/ZNTNZYYUJBBQDK3RFTL5AWNCAY.jpg
    Quick, QCIC, you need to send Putler a new supply of bleach for washing his hands, he's running out fast!

    Replies: @QCIC

    , @John Johnson
    @QCIC

    War is hell and best avoided. Ukraine was manipulated by the West, but some Ukrainians made a choice and all are now paying for it.

    The Ukrainians elected Zelensky who defeated the pro-Western candidate.

    Which choice was wrong exactly? Fighting back?

    They don't want to be under Putin's boot. Why is that so hard to understand?

    Prighozhin recently stated that the invasion was based on lies:
    https://abcnews.go.com/International/stunning-rebuke-putin-wagner-chief-russias-invasion-ukraine/story?id=100335756

    I guess in this case you guys can at least call him a Jew and be accurate.

    Better hope that Putin puts a hit on his Jewish chef. The 5'3 dictator is being humiliated by his Voldemort warlord.

    Replies: @QCIC

  31. @QCIC
    @Mr. Hack

    Ukraine is a pawn of the West, but a pawn can still be dangerous and Russia had to deal with it. When this is over Russia will help rebuild parts of Ukraine. Many Russians will eventually understand the bigger Cold War picture and hold the West accountable for this tragedy. The combatants and their survivors will not be so forgiving of Ukrainians. Such is war.

    War is hell and best avoided. Ukraine was manipulated by the West, but some Ukrainians made a choice and all are now paying for it.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @John Johnson

    A typical appeaser line. Better to be a pawn of the West, than one for a loser state like RusFed.

    BTW, are you an American?


    Quick, QCIC, you need to send Putler a new supply of bleach for washing his hands, he’s running out fast!

    • Troll: RadicalCenter
    • Replies: @QCIC
    @Mr. Hack

    The West set WW3 into motion by dropping out of the ABM Treaty. This Ukraine mess is part of that larger picture. Your poor little pawn of Ukraine got cocky and lost sight of what they were getting involved in.

    Yes, I am American. Unlike many, I realize that starting a nuclear WW3 with Russia will be very bad.

    The stupid little wars supported by naive cheerleaders lead to loss of freedom for US citizens. If they flare into a nuclear WW3, then our civilization may be lost. Bad plan, grandpa.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @Mr. XYZ, @John Johnson, @Mr. Hack

  32. @Greasy William
    @John Johnson

    The Russians are a mess, the invasion is evil and Russia is not going to conquer Ukraine, but Russia is clearly winning the war at this time.

    The Ukrainian offensive has failed. Badly. It should never have been launched in the first place and has maybe 2 weeks left before it is formally canceled. There is simply no way to break through the lines of an entrenched, near peer enemy when that same enemy also has air superiority. This offensive was launched solely because the evil Biden regime demanded it, even Zelensky didn't seem to want it.

    You don't need to take my word for it, just read the Western press. The Western press is the propaganda arm of the CIA/Pentagon and they are saying that the offensive is failing and that the Russians are fighting well. This is a sign that they are getting ready to wind the war down. Furthermore, Ukraine has just launched a massive mobilization drive, the broadest one yet. This is likely related to the large losses Ukraine has suffered in this offensive.

    Right now it appears that Russia is planning another Bakhmut style grind to retake Kharkov. Once Kharkov falls, that will be the end. Both sides will agree to a ceasefire in place in exchange for no Ukrainian entry into NATO and the EU, a portion of Russia's frozen overseas funds being used for Ukrainian reconstruction, formal recognition of all Russian conquests as part of the Russian Federation, lifting of the sanctions, a formal Ukrainian commitment to protect the rights of Russian speakers in Ukraine and a commitment that Ukraine will not receive long range weapons or an expansion of its air power. Ukraine will receive official commitments from the West for reconstruction funds and unofficial commitments for military protection in the event that Russia resumes hostilities, in addition to massive amounts of military hardware and assistance building up its defense industry.

    Technically this will be an American victory but practically it will be an American defeat because ending the war will have required some US concessions to Russia. This will prove that the US no longer has the strength to enforce the liberal international order and will thus mark the official end of US hegemony.

    Replies: @Yevardian, @Mr. XYZ, @John Johnson

    The Russians are a mess, the invasion is evil and Russia is not going to conquer Ukraine, but Russia is clearly winning the war at this time.

    The Ukrainian offensive has failed. Badly. It should never have been launched in the first place and has maybe 2 weeks left before it is formally canceled.

    You can’t judge an offensive this early. We haven’t even seen the full tank force.

    The Nazis took Ukraine in a month and to this day is considered an exceptional military achievement due to a strategic envelopment at Kiev. Historically most offensives in modern warfare run months to years.

    Prigozhin isn’t convinced that the Russians can hold. So once again the pro-Putin bloggers are in contradiction with the main general on the ground.

    There is simply no way to break through the lines of an entrenched, near peer enemy when that same enemy also has air superiority.

    There is no air superiority by either side. The Ukrainians have been driving tanks around in broad daylight ever since the war started. The RAF has mostly been a no show. The Ukrainians never had much of an air force but they will be getting over 30 F-16s.

    It should never have been launched in the first place and has maybe 2 weeks left before it is formally canceled

    I think it was launched too early. They never should have announced anything. All that did was direct Russia to build defensive lines. The Nazis made the same mistake with Kursk. Too much of a warning was given.

    But an offensive needed to happen at some point. They can’t just sit in defensive lines with Bradleys and Strikers. It makes sense to launch an offensive even if it comes with above average risk. It’s not as if their net losses are zero in a defensive position.

    It’s clear from the captured Russian POWs that they are scraping the barrel for conscripts. Russia is lying about their losses and continues to send 2 week conscripts to the front. A single breakthrough could cause a major headache for the Russians. Note that Stalingrad was lost because the Russians pushed on weaker Romanian and Italian units that were guarding the rear. We could see a similar breakthrough whereby inexperienced and demoralized conscripts simply flee and allow a massive salient.

    Technically this will be an American victory but practically it will be an American defeat because ending the war will have required some US concessions to Russia.

    Which concessions would those be?

  33. @QCIC
    @Mr. Hack

    Ukraine is a pawn of the West, but a pawn can still be dangerous and Russia had to deal with it. When this is over Russia will help rebuild parts of Ukraine. Many Russians will eventually understand the bigger Cold War picture and hold the West accountable for this tragedy. The combatants and their survivors will not be so forgiving of Ukrainians. Such is war.

    War is hell and best avoided. Ukraine was manipulated by the West, but some Ukrainians made a choice and all are now paying for it.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @John Johnson

    War is hell and best avoided. Ukraine was manipulated by the West, but some Ukrainians made a choice and all are now paying for it.

    The Ukrainians elected Zelensky who defeated the pro-Western candidate.

    Which choice was wrong exactly? Fighting back?

    They don’t want to be under Putin’s boot. Why is that so hard to understand?

    Prighozhin recently stated that the invasion was based on lies:
    https://abcnews.go.com/International/stunning-rebuke-putin-wagner-chief-russias-invasion-ukraine/story?id=100335756

    I guess in this case you guys can at least call him a Jew and be accurate.

    Better hope that Putin puts a hit on his Jewish chef. The 5’3 dictator is being humiliated by his Voldemort warlord.

    • Replies: @QCIC
    @John Johnson

    A lot of wheels had been set in motion by then. The best thing the Ukrainians could have done was let the South Eastern regions and Crimea return to Russia without controversy. Too bad the people in Kiev are not that sensible.

    I wonder if your boy Prigozin is trying to force Russia to publicly acknowledge the big picture? Maybe he thinks Putin should explain that the West has been trying to destroy Russia for a long time and Ukraine is only a small part of that scenario in its role as lead pawn.

    Do you really believe Zelensky is a functioning President? C'mon, you can spell your own name so I think you are sharp enough to understand he is a puppet. It's OK, we have one, too.

  34. @Mr. Hack
    @QCIC

    A typical appeaser line. Better to be a pawn of the West, than one for a loser state like RusFed.

    BTW, are you an American?

    https://cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/advancelocal/ZNTNZYYUJBBQDK3RFTL5AWNCAY.jpg
    Quick, QCIC, you need to send Putler a new supply of bleach for washing his hands, he's running out fast!

    Replies: @QCIC

    The West set WW3 into motion by dropping out of the ABM Treaty. This Ukraine mess is part of that larger picture. Your poor little pawn of Ukraine got cocky and lost sight of what they were getting involved in.

    Yes, I am American. Unlike many, I realize that starting a nuclear WW3 with Russia will be very bad.

    The stupid little wars supported by naive cheerleaders lead to loss of freedom for US citizens. If they flare into a nuclear WW3, then our civilization may be lost. Bad plan, grandpa.

    • Thanks: RadicalCenter
    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @QCIC

    The US finally backs the right horse in the world today. Once it helps Ukraine to completely maintain its autonomy it will regain its former moral superiority. Ukraine hasn't even received the F-16's promised, so we're far, far away from US involvement with boots on the ground. So, you may go back to your bong and resume playing "Senryaku VII" (US vs Russia fighting it out in Eurasia) on your living room couch on PS2, Lad. :-)

    https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/51bNU+VKfIL.jpg

    Replies: @QCIC, @RadicalCenter

    , @Mr. XYZ
    @QCIC


    The West set WW3 into motion by dropping out of the ABM Treaty.
     
    That was a mistake. Why didn't Obama return to this treaty?

    Replies: @QCIC

    , @John Johnson
    @QCIC

    The West set WW3 into motion by dropping out of the ABM Treaty.

    That was in 2002 which was actually during the time when Putin recognized the autonomy of Ukraine. He is on video in 2008 stating that they have no border contentions and that included Crimea. I have posted that video before but can provide it again if you would like. It was only in his later years that he reversed his own position and decided that Ukraine doesn't exist.

    But you are saying that a treaty related to nuclear arms is the cause of the war even though it wasn't mentioned by Putin in his original invasion speech?

    Since he didn't mention the ABM that means he launched the war over false pretenses.

    Do explain using logic and reason as to how Putin had no choice but to launch a military invasion of Ukraine with false pretenses over a treaty that GWB left 20 years earlier.

    Replies: @Beckow

    , @Mr. Hack
    @QCIC


    I realize that starting a nuclear WW3 with Russia will be very bad.
     
    A patriotic, real American would think that Russia starting a nuclear with the West and with America will be a very bad thing. You've got your focus all mixed-up. Appeasers usually do. :-(

    https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/577586e937c581b49591b5c7/a2b71a94-90bd-4f3e-8245-3fa74fd55fda/012B2A09-36D7-42F0-9087-B58BA2EA3F16.jpeg
    The old Hitler was wrong then, as the new Putler is wrong today. History has taught us that appeasing any Hitler is the wrong thing to do, whenever he appears of the world stage.

    Replies: @John Johnson, @QCIC, @Gerard1234

  35. The main supply line bridge in Chonhar for Russian troops (70% of supplies) fighting in Kherson and Zaporizhya has been seriously bombed. Where sorely needed supplies needed by the Russian side are far and few between, Ukrainian forces make a big strike. Go home Russian troops!

    Ukraine is losing the counteroffensive…right?……

  36. @John Johnson
    @QCIC

    War is hell and best avoided. Ukraine was manipulated by the West, but some Ukrainians made a choice and all are now paying for it.

    The Ukrainians elected Zelensky who defeated the pro-Western candidate.

    Which choice was wrong exactly? Fighting back?

    They don't want to be under Putin's boot. Why is that so hard to understand?

    Prighozhin recently stated that the invasion was based on lies:
    https://abcnews.go.com/International/stunning-rebuke-putin-wagner-chief-russias-invasion-ukraine/story?id=100335756

    I guess in this case you guys can at least call him a Jew and be accurate.

    Better hope that Putin puts a hit on his Jewish chef. The 5'3 dictator is being humiliated by his Voldemort warlord.

    Replies: @QCIC

    A lot of wheels had been set in motion by then. The best thing the Ukrainians could have done was let the South Eastern regions and Crimea return to Russia without controversy. Too bad the people in Kiev are not that sensible.

    I wonder if your boy Prigozin is trying to force Russia to publicly acknowledge the big picture? Maybe he thinks Putin should explain that the West has been trying to destroy Russia for a long time and Ukraine is only a small part of that scenario in its role as lead pawn.

    Do you really believe Zelensky is a functioning President? C’mon, you can spell your own name so I think you are sharp enough to understand he is a puppet. It’s OK, we have one, too.

  37. America calls the shots in the West; I think it is now becoming clear that while the low cost Superpower-American security guarantee called Nato may oblige London (forever raiding the defence budget for social spending without raising taxes), to act like a US sockpuppet, and even Berlin and Paris have to shut up and go along with America, which has not won or even fought an non asymmetrical war for several decades. Ukraine is the sockpuppet boxing glove of the Pentagon so this is an indirect war with Russian dying in droves by the US military not getting a scratch, Nevertheless the opponent is a near peer in its own near abroad that went into the Special Military Operation with the intention of excluding the most powerful country on Earth from influence in a vast East of the Dnieper borderland region at least.

    The inviolableness of the resources the Kremlin can draw on has become clear; in other words their limit is not discernable, and the ‘frog boiling’ method may not work at any intensity. Russia is a country that at the very least the West will have to industrially and economically ‘bring its lunch’ in order to have a chance of dissuading the Kremlin from continuing the Special Military Operation. America has the industrial and economic power to make a good attempt at doing this, because it is has a very advanced society, whereby with all sorts of augmenting up of existing arms producing capacity or repurposing of other productive capacity would be merely a matter of will, and even technical innovations are within reach to create entirely new production facilities and new weapons.

    Britain France and even Germany are in a very different situation their economies would not be able to bear the strain of such a total indirect war strategy without cracking. For example the interest rate rises are already led to a steep climb in the cost of mortgages in Britain. Nevertheless. it is Britain and France supplying the Storm Shadow missiles the lighter payload French one (maybe more difficult to shoot down) being used the otehr day to strike a key Crimean road link bridge by the Ukrainian. From this we can see that 1 America wants to hold back ATACMs (heavy warhead much longer range and capable of destroying hardened bunkers), to answer any further Russian surge so as to convey that Russia cannot win and America will always up the ante. 2 Not merely the common Ukraine population are cannon fodder for Washington’s try at foiling Russia’s SMO , because Russia has threatened that the leadership in Kiev (“decision making centres) would be targeted if the Western long range missiles were used for strikes on the lines of communication to Crimea. I think Ukraine leadership, military equipment and army will be slowly but surely written down. And America will likely say it ‘did its best’ and to do more would mean WW3. I suppose it is possible that Washington will prefer to intervene more directly and present Russia with a hard either/ or: either continue conventionally to certain defeat and elimination of RusFed as a force to be reckoned with in the world or step on to the thermonuclear ladder of escalation, if they chose to maintain their current status, by showing they will go all the way to the top one tit for tat pus ante thermonuclear detonation at a time.

    “The West is leading Ukraine down the primrose path,” Mearsheimer averred in 2015, “and the end result is that Ukraine is going to get wrecked.”

  38. A123 says: • Website

    Kiev aggression is going poorly. Let Loose the Lies of Desperation (1)

    Zelensky Issues Nuclear Plant False Flag Warning As Counteroffensive Fails

    Zelensky is in essence alleging Moscow is plotting a false flag attack on the very facility its own forces have long been occupying and controlling. Russian forces have overseen the local staff which keeps the nuclear plant, Europe’s largest, in operation.

    While Zelensky offered no evidence or any concrete details to back his new and alarming warnings surrounding the Zaporizhzhia power plant, he concluded his video message by saying, “the world has been warned, so the world can and must act.”

    The idea of Russia intentionally creating a nuclear event when fallout travels East is inconceivable and absurd. Just how fearful is Zelensky? Is this crazy performance his the last act before fleeing to safety in the European Empire?

    PEACE 😇
    __________

    (1) https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/dangerous-moment-zelensky-issues-nuclear-plant-false-flag-warning-counteroffensive

    • Troll: Mr. Hack
    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @A123

    kremlinstoogeA123 is spreading his lies again. Russia is wrong in invading Ukraine, and he's just full of it supporting Putler and this stupid war.

  39. @QCIC
    @Mr. Hack

    The West set WW3 into motion by dropping out of the ABM Treaty. This Ukraine mess is part of that larger picture. Your poor little pawn of Ukraine got cocky and lost sight of what they were getting involved in.

    Yes, I am American. Unlike many, I realize that starting a nuclear WW3 with Russia will be very bad.

    The stupid little wars supported by naive cheerleaders lead to loss of freedom for US citizens. If they flare into a nuclear WW3, then our civilization may be lost. Bad plan, grandpa.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @Mr. XYZ, @John Johnson, @Mr. Hack

    The US finally backs the right horse in the world today. Once it helps Ukraine to completely maintain its autonomy it will regain its former moral superiority. Ukraine hasn’t even received the F-16’s promised, so we’re far, far away from US involvement with boots on the ground. So, you may go back to your bong and resume playing “Senryaku VII” (US vs Russia fighting it out in Eurasia) on your living room couch on PS2, Lad. 🙂

    • Replies: @QCIC
    @Mr. Hack

    I think you have me confused with someone else. Don't be so touchy, the "grandpa" line was supposed to be a twisted homage to a stupid movie called Red, except that I got it wrong: "Bad move, Grandpa!"

    , @RadicalCenter
    @Mr. Hack

    People who disagree with me are dumb, and they smoke a lotta weed and play video games, all of them. Huh-huh, huh-huh, huh-huh.

    Fuck yourself, "lad."

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

  40. @QCIC
    @Mikel

    I don't think it was me. I had few opinions on tactical actions at that point. More recently I have foolishly made a few tactical comments. I am not a warrior (real or LARP) so my tactical comments are largely based on what I know about military technology. In other cases they are derived from the larger strategic picture or human nature.

    I am mostly a single issue commenter: Let's avoid nuclear WW3.

    Independently of that point, I think this whole mess is an aggression by the West against Russia using Ukraine as a pawn. There is a clear and uncontroversial history from the early 1990s to now which thoroughly makes this case.

    Since this combat is happening directly on the Western border of Russia I think Ukraine inevitably loses unless the outcome is otherwise pre-ordained. The West believed otherwise, probably because they overestimated the power of the economic warfare and the strength of their fifth column inside Russia.

    +++

    I agree that the size of the force applied to Kiev was way too small to do the job, so a diversionary attack seems plausible. I did not understand either of these points at the time, but in retrospect they are both obvious. Yet that cannot be the full story.

    Part of the early Russian forces were clearly inadequately prepared, so I think Russia was rushed into action before they were ready.

    It looks like Putin would have preferred negotiation so the idea that the force was intended as a bluff makes some sense, but not much. I don't think generals do bluffs very well.

    It also looks like there was some faction which foolishly believed attitudes in Kiev were much more favorable toward Russia than they really were. I don't think anyone in these comments would have been confused about this in 2021, so it seems even less likely those in the Kremlin were confused. I wonder if this suggests a very powerful fifth column inside the Kremlin acting as a Judas goat to drag Russia into Ukraine to get her head chopped off financially and militarily?

    Replies: @LondonBob, @Mikel

    I don’t think it was me.

    Yes, sorry. That was AnonfromTN. I remember now.

    As for the Russian contingent in Belarus and Southern Russia being too small to take Kiev, that is easy to say after the fact but the Pentagon had perfect information of what forces were ready for the invasion and their assessment was that it would take them a matter of days to take Kiev (96 hours iirc). With competent planning and logistics, superior technology, suppression of air defenses and C+C centers in the first hours of the offensive, it was a realistic assessment. That’s how the Pentagon itself had successfully carried out similar operations in recent years, much further away from its frontiers. The Russians failed at every single one of those objectives though. Kabul didn’t fall because of the large amount of US troops sent there at all.

    • Replies: @QCIC
    @Mikel

    Did you read the piece in the link in comment #26 by LondonBob above?

    Have you watched the Ukraine videos by Carlton Meyer? These may not change your opinion but will give you crucial background on this mess.

  41. @A123
    Kiev aggression is going poorly. Let Loose the Lies of Desperation (1)

    Zelensky Issues Nuclear Plant False Flag Warning As Counteroffensive Fails

     

    Zelensky is in essence alleging Moscow is plotting a false flag attack on the very facility its own forces have long been occupying and controlling. Russian forces have overseen the local staff which keeps the nuclear plant, Europe's largest, in operation.
    ...
    While Zelensky offered no evidence or any concrete details to back his new and alarming warnings surrounding the Zaporizhzhia power plant, he concluded his video message by saying, "the world has been warned, so the world can and must act."
     
    The idea of Russia intentionally creating a nuclear event when fallout travels East is inconceivable and absurd. Just how fearful is Zelensky? Is this crazy performance his the last act before fleeing to safety in the European Empire?

    PEACE 😇
    __________

    (1) https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/dangerous-moment-zelensky-issues-nuclear-plant-false-flag-warning-counteroffensive

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

    kremlinstoogeA123 is spreading his lies again. Russia is wrong in invading Ukraine, and he’s just full of it supporting Putler and this stupid war.

  42. @Mr. Hack
    @QCIC

    The US finally backs the right horse in the world today. Once it helps Ukraine to completely maintain its autonomy it will regain its former moral superiority. Ukraine hasn't even received the F-16's promised, so we're far, far away from US involvement with boots on the ground. So, you may go back to your bong and resume playing "Senryaku VII" (US vs Russia fighting it out in Eurasia) on your living room couch on PS2, Lad. :-)

    https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/51bNU+VKfIL.jpg

    Replies: @QCIC, @RadicalCenter

    I think you have me confused with someone else. Don’t be so touchy, the “grandpa” line was supposed to be a twisted homage to a stupid movie called Red, except that I got it wrong: “Bad move, Grandpa!”

  43. @John Johnson
    Some of the most shocking first person footage of trench combat from the war:
    https://funker530.com/video/nsfw-russian-soldiers-gunned-down-point-blank-in-trench/

    The Russians are looking pretty clueless. Attacking Ukrainians have most likely been trained by NATO countries. Note that the Ukrainians clearly have better gear.

    Funny how I was called a Jew last year for pointing out that some of the Russians troops didn't have proper camo or boots. Now there are daily videos of Russian conscripts running out in garage sale looking camo and holding an AK-47 with iron sights.

    EVERYTHING IS GOING AS PLANNED COMRADE

    OUR LORD DWARF PUTIN KNOWS WHAT HE IS DOING

    T-55s and classic AK-47s are all part of a 5D chess plan where Putin makes it look like he is running out of modern equipment.

    GENIUS MOVE DWARF

    Replies: @Greasy William, @Fidelios Automata, @Xavier Pendable

    No, you’re not a Jew… but, you sure are an uninformed troll.

    Have a 🙂 day

    • Agree: Adolf Smith
  44. @Mikel
    @QCIC


    I don’t think it was me.
     
    Yes, sorry. That was AnonfromTN. I remember now.

    As for the Russian contingent in Belarus and Southern Russia being too small to take Kiev, that is easy to say after the fact but the Pentagon had perfect information of what forces were ready for the invasion and their assessment was that it would take them a matter of days to take Kiev (96 hours iirc). With competent planning and logistics, superior technology, suppression of air defenses and C+C centers in the first hours of the offensive, it was a realistic assessment. That's how the Pentagon itself had successfully carried out similar operations in recent years, much further away from its frontiers. The Russians failed at every single one of those objectives though. Kabul didn't fall because of the large amount of US troops sent there at all.

    Replies: @QCIC

    Did you read the piece in the link in comment #26 by LondonBob above?

    Have you watched the Ukraine videos by Carlton Meyer? These may not change your opinion but will give you crucial background on this mess.

  45. @LondonBob
    @QCIC

    Absent the Biden White House I think a deal would have been struck in Istanbul, it was the ideological nutjobs in the West the Kremlin misjudged. Although this has inadvertently been a stroke of luck, Russia will be far more successful now than if a quick deal would have delivered.

    I don't see any serious military analyst suggest Russia actually intended to capture Kiev with a mere 40k, except the usual suspects engaged in propaganda, and whose record demonstrates that.

    The legendary Marine Corps General Paul Van Riper wrote the definitive analysis.

    https://imetatronink.substack.com/p/a-former-us-marine-corps-officershtml

    Replies: @QCIC, @Mikel

    I don’t see any serious military analyst suggest Russia actually intended to capture Kiev with a mere 40k, except the usual suspects engaged in propaganda

    You have that exactly backwards. Everybody knew in almost minute detail what forces were amassed north of Ukraine, which is why there were several months of negotiations to prevent the attack, and everybody (Western, Russian and pro-Russian analysts) was convinced that Kiev would fall within days of the invasion. We were all discussing that here a year and a half ago. How can you expect people to forget such recent events?

    The Russians actually managed to get to the outskirts of Kiev from 2-3 different directions. They got to about 20-30 km from the city center. But their armored columns proved to be easy prey for the Ukrainian defenders and they failed to establish air supremacy or decapitate the state and military structures of the enemy so they were losing their best soldiers in the Kiev attack. The idea that the Russians got so close to Kiev at so much risk and loss to themselves but never intended to take it is clownish.

    • Replies: @Matra
    @Mikel

    Kiev was an attempted 'coup de main'. Edward Luttwak explains it part way through this interview

    I suppose from Putin's perspective it was worth a try even if the odds were against it.

    Replies: @QCIC

    , @LondonBob
    @Mikel

    Just because you were dumb enough to fall for the deception...

    Anyway it is acknowledged they didn't think Russia would move as there were very few troops on the border, indeed Russia, until partial mobilisation, had used very few troops in the Ukraine, very much outnumbered by the Ukrainians until recently. That was why I didn't think they would invade, too few to do so, I was wrong. Still it remains, no one in their right mind thinks you could take a city of three million with forty thousand soldiers, but it turns out it was sufficient to invade, disrupt supply lines and create confusion.

    Replies: @John Johnson, @Mikel

  46. @Mikel
    @LondonBob


    I don’t see any serious military analyst suggest Russia actually intended to capture Kiev with a mere 40k, except the usual suspects engaged in propaganda
     
    You have that exactly backwards. Everybody knew in almost minute detail what forces were amassed north of Ukraine, which is why there were several months of negotiations to prevent the attack, and everybody (Western, Russian and pro-Russian analysts) was convinced that Kiev would fall within days of the invasion. We were all discussing that here a year and a half ago. How can you expect people to forget such recent events?

    The Russians actually managed to get to the outskirts of Kiev from 2-3 different directions. They got to about 20-30 km from the city center. But their armored columns proved to be easy prey for the Ukrainian defenders and they failed to establish air supremacy or decapitate the state and military structures of the enemy so they were losing their best soldiers in the Kiev attack. The idea that the Russians got so close to Kiev at so much risk and loss to themselves but never intended to take it is clownish.

    Replies: @Matra, @LondonBob

    Kiev was an attempted ‘coup de main’. Edward Luttwak explains it part way through this interview

    I suppose from Putin’s perspective it was worth a try even if the odds were against it.

    • Agree: AP, Mr. XYZ
    • LOL: LondonBob
    • Replies: @QCIC
    @Matra

    Luttwak sounds like a con-man. His face even reminds me of Progozin.

    I like his point about the Kremlins confusing the roles of the FSB and SVR. That has a tiny hint of plausibility.

    The coup de main could never have worked without a very extensive fifth column inside the Ukrainian government and military. I don't think there has been much evidence for that, at least not in the past 5 years. After all, the SBU and NeoNAZIs are there to weed out just that sort of thing.

    I still wonder if some of the early Russian moves were made for posterity based on this train of thought: "We are giving you a chance, we know you have been misled and we don't hate you. Ok, so you want to kill us and drive us out? Well, we tried."

    Replies: @LondonBob, @Matra

  47. AP says:
    @china-russia-all-the-way
    @Greasy William

    Polish immigration stats in 2022 are surprising. Very brown. How much of this is due to the pressure to conform to the West because of NATO integration?

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fy6qGLTWYAIDG-n?format=jpg&name=medium

    Replies: @AP

    Poles say the chart is fake and the numbers don’t match the actual government stats.

    Furthermore, the chart (which may be fake) is about work permits, not immigration. I suspect people overstaying their visas would be more likely to move west to Germany then to stay illegally in Poland.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @AP


    I suspect people overstaying their visas would be more likely to move west to Germany then to stay illegally in Poland.
     
    Due to Germany being more lax in immigration enforcement relative to Poland? Very possibly. But what happens once Germany becomes oversaturated with migrants and its quality of life begins to significantly suffer? Then Poland will look more attractive, no?

    Germany and Poland already have roughly similar average IQs according to PISA, which likely means that Poland will eventually become as wealthy as Germany currently is.
    , @Mr. XYZ
    @AP

    BTW, this is *very* off-topic, but I might as well ask:

    What was the position of the Ukrainian Socialist Revolutionaries (the party that most Ukrainians voted for in 1917) on the question of Intermarium?

  48. @QCIC
    @Mr. Hack

    The West set WW3 into motion by dropping out of the ABM Treaty. This Ukraine mess is part of that larger picture. Your poor little pawn of Ukraine got cocky and lost sight of what they were getting involved in.

    Yes, I am American. Unlike many, I realize that starting a nuclear WW3 with Russia will be very bad.

    The stupid little wars supported by naive cheerleaders lead to loss of freedom for US citizens. If they flare into a nuclear WW3, then our civilization may be lost. Bad plan, grandpa.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @Mr. XYZ, @John Johnson, @Mr. Hack

    The West set WW3 into motion by dropping out of the ABM Treaty.

    That was a mistake. Why didn’t Obama return to this treaty?

    • Replies: @QCIC
    @Mr. XYZ

    Dropping out of the ABM Treaty was a mistake but was not accidental. This was a major early step in the long-term policy to pressure Russia militarily which continued with subsequent administrations. They are all more or less captured by the Neocons so the consistently hostile policy toward Russia is no surprise.

    Now that the USA and NATO counties are publicly involved in Ukraine, Russia has suspended the New START process (though not cancelled IIRC). So in the next round of BS the Neocons will paint Russia as the bad guy and pretend all the prior Western extremely aggressive moves didn't happen.

    Our 'leaders' do kindergarten-level shit like this all the time.

    The future challenge will be that the West needs to make serious one-sided concessions to revive the arms control negotiation process. That will be politically challenging. A multiparty negotiation might take some of the sting out of that but also leads us straight down the drain to globalism.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

  49. @AP
    @china-russia-all-the-way

    Poles say the chart is fake and the numbers don’t match the actual government stats.

    Furthermore, the chart (which may be fake) is about work permits, not immigration. I suspect people overstaying their visas would be more likely to move west to Germany then to stay illegally in Poland.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Mr. XYZ

    I suspect people overstaying their visas would be more likely to move west to Germany then to stay illegally in Poland.

    Due to Germany being more lax in immigration enforcement relative to Poland? Very possibly. But what happens once Germany becomes oversaturated with migrants and its quality of life begins to significantly suffer? Then Poland will look more attractive, no?

    Germany and Poland already have roughly similar average IQs according to PISA, which likely means that Poland will eventually become as wealthy as Germany currently is.

  50. @AP
    @china-russia-all-the-way

    Poles say the chart is fake and the numbers don’t match the actual government stats.

    Furthermore, the chart (which may be fake) is about work permits, not immigration. I suspect people overstaying their visas would be more likely to move west to Germany then to stay illegally in Poland.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Mr. XYZ

    BTW, this is *very* off-topic, but I might as well ask:

    What was the position of the Ukrainian Socialist Revolutionaries (the party that most Ukrainians voted for in 1917) on the question of Intermarium?

  51. @Mr. XYZ
    @QCIC


    The West set WW3 into motion by dropping out of the ABM Treaty.
     
    That was a mistake. Why didn't Obama return to this treaty?

    Replies: @QCIC

    Dropping out of the ABM Treaty was a mistake but was not accidental. This was a major early step in the long-term policy to pressure Russia militarily which continued with subsequent administrations. They are all more or less captured by the Neocons so the consistently hostile policy toward Russia is no surprise.

    Now that the USA and NATO counties are publicly involved in Ukraine, Russia has suspended the New START process (though not cancelled IIRC). So in the next round of BS the Neocons will paint Russia as the bad guy and pretend all the prior Western extremely aggressive moves didn’t happen.

    Our ‘leaders’ do kindergarten-level shit like this all the time.

    The future challenge will be that the West needs to make serious one-sided concessions to revive the arms control negotiation process. That will be politically challenging. A multiparty negotiation might take some of the sting out of that but also leads us straight down the drain to globalism.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @QCIC

    I'm quite content with the US returning to the ABM Treaty as a way of reducing tensions with Russia. This treaty won't hurt our ability to effectively respond to China, will it?

    Replies: @QCIC

  52. @QCIC
    @Mr. Hack

    The West set WW3 into motion by dropping out of the ABM Treaty. This Ukraine mess is part of that larger picture. Your poor little pawn of Ukraine got cocky and lost sight of what they were getting involved in.

    Yes, I am American. Unlike many, I realize that starting a nuclear WW3 with Russia will be very bad.

    The stupid little wars supported by naive cheerleaders lead to loss of freedom for US citizens. If they flare into a nuclear WW3, then our civilization may be lost. Bad plan, grandpa.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @Mr. XYZ, @John Johnson, @Mr. Hack

    The West set WW3 into motion by dropping out of the ABM Treaty.

    That was in 2002 which was actually during the time when Putin recognized the autonomy of Ukraine. He is on video in 2008 stating that they have no border contentions and that included Crimea. I have posted that video before but can provide it again if you would like. It was only in his later years that he reversed his own position and decided that Ukraine doesn’t exist.

    But you are saying that a treaty related to nuclear arms is the cause of the war even though it wasn’t mentioned by Putin in his original invasion speech?

    Since he didn’t mention the ABM that means he launched the war over false pretenses.

    Do explain using logic and reason as to how Putin had no choice but to launch a military invasion of Ukraine with false pretenses over a treaty that GWB left 20 years earlier.

    • Replies: @Beckow
    @John Johnson

    You should realize that what you wrote is an embarrassing and incoherent rant - you are defending the indefensible by claiming that either nobody noticed US leaving the ABM Treaty or that the criticism wasn't timed and stated exactly as you would like it.

    That is nonsense: US dropped out of ABM and that started - or accelerated - the process towards the war where we ended up in 2022: by then the war became almost inevitable - the obvious candidate was Ukraine.

    You pretend not to understand that things change, that people can't predict the future, that there is an obvious dynamic of give-and-take. You are an ideological hack who cheerleads the war. Still, it is quite a hole to fall into - you really don't think that unilaterally dropping out of ABM had a drastic impact on Russia's strategy? Why would you say something so stupid? It looks like you are being told what to write.

    Replies: @John Johnson

  53. @QCIC
    @Mr. Hack

    The West set WW3 into motion by dropping out of the ABM Treaty. This Ukraine mess is part of that larger picture. Your poor little pawn of Ukraine got cocky and lost sight of what they were getting involved in.

    Yes, I am American. Unlike many, I realize that starting a nuclear WW3 with Russia will be very bad.

    The stupid little wars supported by naive cheerleaders lead to loss of freedom for US citizens. If they flare into a nuclear WW3, then our civilization may be lost. Bad plan, grandpa.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @Mr. XYZ, @John Johnson, @Mr. Hack

    I realize that starting a nuclear WW3 with Russia will be very bad.

    A patriotic, real American would think that Russia starting a nuclear with the West and with America will be a very bad thing. You’ve got your focus all mixed-up. Appeasers usually do. 🙁
    The old Hitler was wrong then, as the new Putler is wrong today. History has taught us that appeasing any Hitler is the wrong thing to do, whenever he appears of the world stage.

    • Troll: RadicalCenter
    • Replies: @John Johnson
    @Mr. Hack

    The old Hitler was wrong then, as the new Putler is wrong today. History has taught us that appeasing any Hitler is the wrong thing to do, whenever he appears of the world stage.

    Both had completely bullshit reasons for war from the onset.

    Hitler was trying to protect ethnic Germans by carpet bombing Warsaw? Are we to believe that it had nothing to do with it being heavily populated by Jews?

    Of course there were no plans for even a reduced Polish state next to Germany. Everyone knew he was completely full of shit when it turned out that he had secretly made a deal with the worst Communist of all time. Not only did Hitler plan on eliminating Poland but he also knew that anti-Communist Poles would be marched off to Gulags. Poles that were in fact veterans of the Soviet-Polish war. Hitler was a total bastard and only decided to fight the Communists after filling Western Europe with the graves of anti-leftists. What a guy.

    Putin was also completely full of shit from day one. He made no demands and ended diplomatic ties with Ukraine. After being pushed out of Kiev he claimed the war was about Donbas. Oh ok dwarf, do we just pretend that we didn't watch tank battles in the suburbs of Kiev? Why didn't you roll into Donbas and then set defensive lines?

    Hitler was at least a competent liar. Putin contradicts himself and can't remember his own lies. He first claimed the war was about stopping the expansion of NATO and then after Finland joined he responded that it doesn't matter. Ok dwarf, makes a lot sense. Might want to look at how much NATO border was added next to Russia.

    , @QCIC
    @Mr. Hack

    This is about the West pressuring Russia in a way that can easily lead to nuclear war. The leaders in the West are willing to risk it because they think they are wise or immortal or some other stupid reason. Why do you support this insanity?

    The West completed many provocations against Russia before Maidan, so the bigger picture has little to do with Ukraine.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

    , @Gerard1234
    @Mr. Hack

    Again, with the cretinous cartoons Hack


    The old Hitler was wrong then, as the new Putler is wrong today.
     
    Dumbass - literally the only thing scum as Hitler was not completely wrong on you are trying to criticise. The whole western world (effectively) supported Hitler taking Poland you dimwit. Actions by western states after September 1939 and then from after the Yalta conference confirm Poland got what it deserved.

    He was an evil level of wrong to mass murder Jews in Poland, but the treatment of Polish nationalists and their worthless cretin fascist-dictatorship state was perfectly socially acceptable behaviour because the Poles were just as bad. Polish imperialism was far more in area and worse than Nazi imperialism at the time.

    The only similarity now is that, strictly on Polish-German relations ONLY, the Nazi demands to Poland were perfectly reasonable ........and of course Russian demands to fuckheadistan puppet state now were perfectly reasonable.

    Comparisons are completely lazy. Despite the BS propaganda fed to a muppet like you Hack, clearly outside of our own land of Ukraine, we have zero intention to take shithole Poland/Baltics or Czechia, Bulgaria etc.

    Hitler presumably didn't take 6 million Polish refugees in, or 4 million in the preceeding 8 years. Presumably Polands last 2 Presidents then were not in the top 1% of taxpayers into Nazi germany state finances of the preceeding 30 years

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Yevardian

  54. @Matra
    @Mikel

    Kiev was an attempted 'coup de main'. Edward Luttwak explains it part way through this interview

    I suppose from Putin's perspective it was worth a try even if the odds were against it.

    Replies: @QCIC

    Luttwak sounds like a con-man. His face even reminds me of Progozin.

    I like his point about the Kremlins confusing the roles of the FSB and SVR. That has a tiny hint of plausibility.

    The coup de main could never have worked without a very extensive fifth column inside the Ukrainian government and military. I don’t think there has been much evidence for that, at least not in the past 5 years. After all, the SBU and NeoNAZIs are there to weed out just that sort of thing.

    I still wonder if some of the early Russian moves were made for posterity based on this train of thought: “We are giving you a chance, we know you have been misled and we don’t hate you. Ok, so you want to kill us and drive us out? Well, we tried.”

    • Replies: @LondonBob
    @QCIC

    Luttwack is a neo-conman.

    Odd how the West continues to obsess about the FSB whilst almost being ignorant of the SVR.

    No doubt the Russians are concerned about perceptions in the world as well as amongst the general Ukrainian and Russian populace. The Kremlin would have happily taken the Donbass and Crimea, with Ukrainian neutrality, but then they also didn't know how well the Russian economy would stand up to the sanctions, they had a stronger hand than they realised.

    Replies: @Matra

    , @Matra
    @QCIC

    The coup de main could never have worked without a very extensive fifth column inside the Ukrainian government and military

    Not necessarily. If you take over key government ministries and the leadership panics and flees, there is a possibility the people won't fight, as they feel abandoned and demoralised by their own leaders. Remember there were intelligent Russians, including our former host, who believed that the Ukrainians wouldn't fight due to their low birthrates and others who seemed (though maybe they were lying) to genuinely believe that many Ukrainians would even welcome them.

    Replies: @QCIC

  55. S says:

    Prighozin (allegedly) is now claiming the Russian armed forces have obliterated a ‘huge number’ of Wagner troops in surprise missile strikes upon their rear encampments, that the Russian military leadership ‘must be stopped’, and is calling upon Russian volunteers to join his forces. [We’ll see how real this claim is, if at all, in the next few hours and day(s).]

    https://news.yahoo.com/wagner-chief-vows-stop-russia-195459412.html

    “A huge number of our fighters, our comrades died.”

    Wagner chief vows to ‘stop’ Russia after alleged attack on forces

    The council of commanders of PMC Wagner has made a decision — the evil that the military leadership of the country brings must be stopped,” Prigozhin said in a series of furious audio messages released by his spokespeople.

    “We were ready to make concessions to the defence ministry, surrender our weapons.

    “Today, seeing that we have not been broken, they conducted missile strikes at our rear camps. A huge number of our fighters, our comrades died.”

    He warned Russians against resisting his forces and called on them to join him, adding “there are 25,000 of us”.

    The Russian defence ministry denied the claims about the strikes, saying the statements “do not correspond to reality”, and calling them a “provocation.”

    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @S

    Wonderful. Ukrainians accept all the help that they can get. Russian internecine warfare can only help stop the madness.

    https://static.kyivpost.com/storage/2023/06/02/96a7ad4a4508797a6ae17ad271b859aa.jpg?w=900&q=90&f=webp
    Putler opens up a jar of scorpions. No two scorpions can live in harmony; they always hunt each others down and only one remains alive.

    Replies: @QCIC

    , @S
    @S

    Prigozhin is now claiming two thousand of his men were killed in the surprise attack. And (allegedly) is to lead his 25,000 man Wagnerite army on a 'March of Justice' on Moscow. Says it's 'not a military coup'.


    I'll put this (tentatively) in the 'New Beer Hall Putsch' category.

    https://www.mediaite.com/news/russian-paramilitary-leader-vows-25000-troop-march-of-justice-on-moscow-to-confront-evil-behind-ukraine-war/


    Russian Paramilitary Leader Vows 25,000 Troop ‘March of Justice’ On Moscow To Confront ‘Evil’ Behind Ukraine War

    Yevgeny Prigozhin, the head of the infamous Wagner paramilitary group, vowed a “march of justice” to root out the “evil” behind what he claimed was a Russian missile strike on his troops, sparking talk of civil conflict within Russia.

    “This is not a military coup, this is a march of justice,” Prigozhin said in videos released on Friday. “Our actions do not impede the troops.”

    “The evil that the military leadership of the country brings forward must be stopped. They have forgotten the word ‘justice,’ and we will return it,” he raged, but never directly mentioned Russian President Vladimir Putin.

    “Anyone attempting resistance will be considered a threat and immediately destroyed. This includes all the checkpoints on our path and any aircraft above our heads,” he added, noting that his battle-hardened troops possess anti-aircraft missiles along with tanks and other heavy equipment.

    Prigozhin, whose mercenary troops have secured key victories for Russia in Ukraine and other battlefields across the globe like Syria, accused the Russian Ministry of Defense of murdering some 2,000 of his troops. The Wagner Group has made headlines throughout the war for its brutal tactics and targeting of civilians, as well as horrendous battlefield executions of its own members accused of desertion or defecting.

    Reuters reported that Prigozhin’s rant was accompanied by a separate “unverified video posted on a Telegram channel close to Wagner [which] showed a scene in a forest where small fires were burning and trees appeared to have been broken by force. There appeared to be one body, but no more direct evidence of any attack.”

    “The minister of defense has ordered 2,000 bodies that are being stored to be hidden so as not to show the losses,” Prigozhin said, adding:

    Those who destroyed our lads, who destroyed the lives of many tens of thousands of Russian soldiers, will be punished. I ask that no one offer resistance…

    There are 25,000 of us and we are going to figure out why chaos is happening in the country.

    Prigozhin also rebutted some of the often repeated justifications for Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, noting that neither NATO nor Ukraine posed a military threat to Russia. In a video earlier in the day, he accused the Russian Ministry of Defense of lying to the Russian people with a “story about the crazy aggression from the Ukrainian side and the plans to attack us with the entire NATO bloc.”
     
  56. @Mikel
    @LondonBob


    I don’t see any serious military analyst suggest Russia actually intended to capture Kiev with a mere 40k, except the usual suspects engaged in propaganda
     
    You have that exactly backwards. Everybody knew in almost minute detail what forces were amassed north of Ukraine, which is why there were several months of negotiations to prevent the attack, and everybody (Western, Russian and pro-Russian analysts) was convinced that Kiev would fall within days of the invasion. We were all discussing that here a year and a half ago. How can you expect people to forget such recent events?

    The Russians actually managed to get to the outskirts of Kiev from 2-3 different directions. They got to about 20-30 km from the city center. But their armored columns proved to be easy prey for the Ukrainian defenders and they failed to establish air supremacy or decapitate the state and military structures of the enemy so they were losing their best soldiers in the Kiev attack. The idea that the Russians got so close to Kiev at so much risk and loss to themselves but never intended to take it is clownish.

    Replies: @Matra, @LondonBob

    Just because you were dumb enough to fall for the deception…

    Anyway it is acknowledged they didn’t think Russia would move as there were very few troops on the border, indeed Russia, until partial mobilisation, had used very few troops in the Ukraine, very much outnumbered by the Ukrainians until recently. That was why I didn’t think they would invade, too few to do so, I was wrong. Still it remains, no one in their right mind thinks you could take a city of three million with forty thousand soldiers, but it turns out it was sufficient to invade, disrupt supply lines and create confusion.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
    @LondonBob

    Anyway it is acknowledged they didn’t think Russia would move as there were very few troops on the border, indeed Russia, until partial mobilisation, had used very few troops in the Ukraine, very much outnumbered by the Ukrainians until recently.

    The US and Britain told him an invasion was absolutely coming and to get ready. It was Zelensky that thought Putin would make demands first. I can go back and dig up public warnings from the CIA and MI6. They knew about the invasion months before it happened. It was leaked to them by someone in the Kremlin.

    Still it remains, no one in their right mind thinks you could take a city of three million with forty thousand soldiers, but it turns out it was sufficient to invade, disrupt supply lines and create confusion.

    40k is enough to take a city of three million citizens. That 3 million includes women, children, infants, elderly, etc. Of course it was all the more difficult given that the government handed out AK-47s to anyone that wanted one. If they had a 2A culture it would have been even harder for the Russians but Ukraine has somewhat bought into Western anti-gun bullshit.

    Russian failed to take Ukraine because of their own mistakes.

    The mistakes the Russians made are well documented. A key mistake was trying to take a major airport. Ukraine correctly guessed which airport and had artillery in preparation. Once the airfield was filled with men and vehicles the Ukrainians let the big guns rip. TIME TO DIE FOR DICTATOR

    Another major mistake was sending a 40 mile column of armor and supply trucks through a slow moving road surrounded by trees. Completely stupid given that the Ukrainians had over 20k anti-armor missiles. We still don't know how many Javalins and NLAWs they purchased. At leastk 20k and an endless supply of RPGs from the Soviet days. They'd take out a vehicle and the whole line would stop. Then Ukrainians would raid them at night. The dwarf really bungled it on that plan.

    Replies: @LondonBob

    , @Mikel
    @LondonBob

    Well, as I said above, 2 days ago Putin left his most servile supporters in the West with egg on their faces (once again) by declaring that he stopped the assault on Kiev as a gesture of good will amid the Istanbul negotiations and actually showed some papers to the press purportedly proving this.

    Of course, those of you defending his 3D chess skills with the Kiev feint will not hesitate to double down and proclaim his 4D skills claiming now that it was a feint to carry out a subsequent feint of a good will gesture but don't you realize how ridiculous you look?

    In any case, Putin has better things to worry about than his hapless Western supporters. According to the latest news, Prigozhin seems to be already on the move.

    Replies: @Yevardian, @LondonBob

  57. @QCIC
    @Matra

    Luttwak sounds like a con-man. His face even reminds me of Progozin.

    I like his point about the Kremlins confusing the roles of the FSB and SVR. That has a tiny hint of plausibility.

    The coup de main could never have worked without a very extensive fifth column inside the Ukrainian government and military. I don't think there has been much evidence for that, at least not in the past 5 years. After all, the SBU and NeoNAZIs are there to weed out just that sort of thing.

    I still wonder if some of the early Russian moves were made for posterity based on this train of thought: "We are giving you a chance, we know you have been misled and we don't hate you. Ok, so you want to kill us and drive us out? Well, we tried."

    Replies: @LondonBob, @Matra

    Luttwack is a neo-conman.

    Odd how the West continues to obsess about the FSB whilst almost being ignorant of the SVR.

    No doubt the Russians are concerned about perceptions in the world as well as amongst the general Ukrainian and Russian populace. The Kremlin would have happily taken the Donbass and Crimea, with Ukrainian neutrality, but then they also didn’t know how well the Russian economy would stand up to the sanctions, they had a stronger hand than they realised.

    • Replies: @Matra
    @LondonBob

    Luttwack is a neo-conman

    He's a Zionist, and, yes, he can be shifty, but he's not a neocon, or any other kind of Trotskyite. I remember him opposing the first Iraq war back in 1990.

    Replies: @LondonBob

  58. @QCIC
    @Matra

    Luttwak sounds like a con-man. His face even reminds me of Progozin.

    I like his point about the Kremlins confusing the roles of the FSB and SVR. That has a tiny hint of plausibility.

    The coup de main could never have worked without a very extensive fifth column inside the Ukrainian government and military. I don't think there has been much evidence for that, at least not in the past 5 years. After all, the SBU and NeoNAZIs are there to weed out just that sort of thing.

    I still wonder if some of the early Russian moves were made for posterity based on this train of thought: "We are giving you a chance, we know you have been misled and we don't hate you. Ok, so you want to kill us and drive us out? Well, we tried."

    Replies: @LondonBob, @Matra

    The coup de main could never have worked without a very extensive fifth column inside the Ukrainian government and military

    Not necessarily. If you take over key government ministries and the leadership panics and flees, there is a possibility the people won’t fight, as they feel abandoned and demoralised by their own leaders. Remember there were intelligent Russians, including our former host, who believed that the Ukrainians wouldn’t fight due to their low birthrates and others who seemed (though maybe they were lying) to genuinely believe that many Ukrainians would even welcome them.

    • Replies: @QCIC
    @Matra

    I think your points might apply if the Russians moved in 2014. By 2022 a significant percentage of Ukrainians seemed to be polarized against Russia and would likely fight a modest invasion force. The central government had been supporting genocidal bombing of Russian speakers for eight years, which may imply this was a socially acceptable policy in Ukraine.

    Replies: @John Johnson

  59. @Mr. Hack
    @QCIC


    I realize that starting a nuclear WW3 with Russia will be very bad.
     
    A patriotic, real American would think that Russia starting a nuclear with the West and with America will be a very bad thing. You've got your focus all mixed-up. Appeasers usually do. :-(

    https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/577586e937c581b49591b5c7/a2b71a94-90bd-4f3e-8245-3fa74fd55fda/012B2A09-36D7-42F0-9087-B58BA2EA3F16.jpeg
    The old Hitler was wrong then, as the new Putler is wrong today. History has taught us that appeasing any Hitler is the wrong thing to do, whenever he appears of the world stage.

    Replies: @John Johnson, @QCIC, @Gerard1234

    The old Hitler was wrong then, as the new Putler is wrong today. History has taught us that appeasing any Hitler is the wrong thing to do, whenever he appears of the world stage.

    Both had completely bullshit reasons for war from the onset.

    Hitler was trying to protect ethnic Germans by carpet bombing Warsaw? Are we to believe that it had nothing to do with it being heavily populated by Jews?

    Of course there were no plans for even a reduced Polish state next to Germany. Everyone knew he was completely full of shit when it turned out that he had secretly made a deal with the worst Communist of all time. Not only did Hitler plan on eliminating Poland but he also knew that anti-Communist Poles would be marched off to Gulags. Poles that were in fact veterans of the Soviet-Polish war. Hitler was a total bastard and only decided to fight the Communists after filling Western Europe with the graves of anti-leftists. What a guy.

    Putin was also completely full of shit from day one. He made no demands and ended diplomatic ties with Ukraine. After being pushed out of Kiev he claimed the war was about Donbas. Oh ok dwarf, do we just pretend that we didn’t watch tank battles in the suburbs of Kiev? Why didn’t you roll into Donbas and then set defensive lines?

    Hitler was at least a competent liar. Putin contradicts himself and can’t remember his own lies. He first claimed the war was about stopping the expansion of NATO and then after Finland joined he responded that it doesn’t matter. Ok dwarf, makes a lot sense. Might want to look at how much NATO border was added next to Russia.

    • Agree: Mr. Hack
  60. @LondonBob
    @QCIC

    Luttwack is a neo-conman.

    Odd how the West continues to obsess about the FSB whilst almost being ignorant of the SVR.

    No doubt the Russians are concerned about perceptions in the world as well as amongst the general Ukrainian and Russian populace. The Kremlin would have happily taken the Donbass and Crimea, with Ukrainian neutrality, but then they also didn't know how well the Russian economy would stand up to the sanctions, they had a stronger hand than they realised.

    Replies: @Matra

    Luttwack is a neo-conman

    He’s a Zionist, and, yes, he can be shifty, but he’s not a neocon, or any other kind of Trotskyite. I remember him opposing the first Iraq war back in 1990.

    • Replies: @LondonBob
    @Matra

    I hadn't heard of him before a few months ago.

  61. @Mr. Hack
    @A123


    If DeSantis is smart, he will drop out of the GOP primary sooner rather than later. Being the governor of Florida is a full time job. And, he is only hurting himself with this anti-MAGA run that cannot succeed.
     
    Perhaps, but only if Trump can find the time to run for the presidency while battling all of his felony charges in court:

    https://arc-anglerfish-washpost-prod-washpost.s3.amazonaws.com/public/RNIT2JI7B5EOZFGUUYIOSLTD3E.jpg

    Replies: @RadicalCenter

    Trump could probably win the republican nomination without campaigning at all.

    Doesn’t matter too much because he’ll either be defrauded out of a general-election win again, or squeak back into office and make no drastic changes to our path towards financial insolvency, a surveillance/police state, and mass disorder and poverty.

  62. @LondonBob
    @Mikel

    Just because you were dumb enough to fall for the deception...

    Anyway it is acknowledged they didn't think Russia would move as there were very few troops on the border, indeed Russia, until partial mobilisation, had used very few troops in the Ukraine, very much outnumbered by the Ukrainians until recently. That was why I didn't think they would invade, too few to do so, I was wrong. Still it remains, no one in their right mind thinks you could take a city of three million with forty thousand soldiers, but it turns out it was sufficient to invade, disrupt supply lines and create confusion.

    Replies: @John Johnson, @Mikel

    Anyway it is acknowledged they didn’t think Russia would move as there were very few troops on the border, indeed Russia, until partial mobilisation, had used very few troops in the Ukraine, very much outnumbered by the Ukrainians until recently.

    The US and Britain told him an invasion was absolutely coming and to get ready. It was Zelensky that thought Putin would make demands first. I can go back and dig up public warnings from the CIA and MI6. They knew about the invasion months before it happened. It was leaked to them by someone in the Kremlin.

    Still it remains, no one in their right mind thinks you could take a city of three million with forty thousand soldiers, but it turns out it was sufficient to invade, disrupt supply lines and create confusion.

    40k is enough to take a city of three million citizens. That 3 million includes women, children, infants, elderly, etc. Of course it was all the more difficult given that the government handed out AK-47s to anyone that wanted one. If they had a 2A culture it would have been even harder for the Russians but Ukraine has somewhat bought into Western anti-gun bullshit.

    Russian failed to take Ukraine because of their own mistakes.

    The mistakes the Russians made are well documented. A key mistake was trying to take a major airport. Ukraine correctly guessed which airport and had artillery in preparation. Once the airfield was filled with men and vehicles the Ukrainians let the big guns rip. TIME TO DIE FOR DICTATOR

    Another major mistake was sending a 40 mile column of armor and supply trucks through a slow moving road surrounded by trees. Completely stupid given that the Ukrainians had over 20k anti-armor missiles. We still don’t know how many Javalins and NLAWs they purchased. At leastk 20k and an endless supply of RPGs from the Soviet days. They’d take out a vehicle and the whole line would stop. Then Ukrainians would raid them at night. The dwarf really bungled it on that plan.

    • LOL: RadicalCenter
    • Replies: @LondonBob
    @John Johnson

    The intelligence agencies, not the Pentagon though, were talking up an invasion so when it didn't happen they could portray the illegitimate Biden as strong. Military sources were all saying too few troops.

    The Russians took the land bridge to Crimea, the greatest prize of all.

    Replies: @John Johnson

  63. @Matra
    @QCIC

    The coup de main could never have worked without a very extensive fifth column inside the Ukrainian government and military

    Not necessarily. If you take over key government ministries and the leadership panics and flees, there is a possibility the people won't fight, as they feel abandoned and demoralised by their own leaders. Remember there were intelligent Russians, including our former host, who believed that the Ukrainians wouldn't fight due to their low birthrates and others who seemed (though maybe they were lying) to genuinely believe that many Ukrainians would even welcome them.

    Replies: @QCIC

    I think your points might apply if the Russians moved in 2014. By 2022 a significant percentage of Ukrainians seemed to be polarized against Russia and would likely fight a modest invasion force. The central government had been supporting genocidal bombing of Russian speakers for eight years, which may imply this was a socially acceptable policy in Ukraine.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
    @QCIC

    I think your points might apply if the Russians moved in 2014. By 2022 a significant percentage of Ukrainians seemed to be polarized against Russia and would likely fight a modest invasion force.

    At best it would have gone to urban partisan warfare. Even without NATO involvement there would have been AK-47s and NLAWs from windows. So some Russian family has to learn that their son was barbecued in a tank because..... ???? Even Russians can't explain this war as seen by the 1420 videos on youtube. Partisans in Kiev would draw it out and Russia would use Gestapo style tactics which would lead to even more sanctions. This was all a stupid plan in any scenario. As I have said many times it would have been cheaper to carve out an area of Russia for Russian Ukrainians and give them 50 acres and 500k Rubles.

    The Ukrainians don't want to be under the boot of Putin. They never wanted to be part of Imperial Russia nor the USSR. This is an inescapable reality that was not going away. Ukrainians are not Russians and understandably do not trust them.

    Even 50k well armed and motivated militia men would be a huge headache for Russia.

    Let not forget that the Russians were defeated by Afghan militias. It's hard to sustain an invasion when even 1% of the opposing population is willing to die trying to take out as many of your soldiers as possible. Invasions work best when the public is neutral to your rule or better yet has a minority that will collude against any resistors. That is how the Mongols were able to suppress Russia for so long. They created a wealthy monarchy that was subservient to their rule. No such alliance exists in Ukraine. The Russians in fact used the separatist militias as cannon fodder. Putin lied about creating LPR/DPR states and took them as Russian territory. The remaining wives of the separatists would likely vote for Russia to return to its borders. Former separatist leader Igor Girkin has completely turned on Putin and thinks he is a dunce when it comes to war. Girkin initially cheered the invasion but now thinks Putin has blown it.

    Replies: @QCIC, @Mr. XYZ

  64. @S
    Prighozin (allegedly) is now claiming the Russian armed forces have obliterated a 'huge number' of Wagner troops in surprise missile strikes upon their rear encampments, that the Russian military leadership 'must be stopped', and is calling upon Russian volunteers to join his forces. [We'll see how real this claim is, if at all, in the next few hours and day(s).]


    https://news.yahoo.com/wagner-chief-vows-stop-russia-195459412.html

    "A huge number of our fighters, our comrades died."

    Wagner chief vows to 'stop' Russia after alleged attack on forces

    The council of commanders of PMC Wagner has made a decision -- the evil that the military leadership of the country brings must be stopped," Prigozhin said in a series of furious audio messages released by his spokespeople.

    "We were ready to make concessions to the defence ministry, surrender our weapons.

    "Today, seeing that we have not been broken, they conducted missile strikes at our rear camps. A huge number of our fighters, our comrades died."

    He warned Russians against resisting his forces and called on them to join him, adding "there are 25,000 of us".

    The Russian defence ministry denied the claims about the strikes, saying the statements "do not correspond to reality", and calling them a "provocation."
     

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @S

    Wonderful. Ukrainians accept all the help that they can get. Russian internecine warfare can only help stop the madness.


    Putler opens up a jar of scorpions. No two scorpions can live in harmony; they always hunt each others down and only one remains alive.

    • Replies: @QCIC
    @Mr. Hack

    You should ask yourself: "What is the next Russian trap the Ukrainians can blunder into?"

  65. @Mr. Hack
    @QCIC


    I realize that starting a nuclear WW3 with Russia will be very bad.
     
    A patriotic, real American would think that Russia starting a nuclear with the West and with America will be a very bad thing. You've got your focus all mixed-up. Appeasers usually do. :-(

    https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/577586e937c581b49591b5c7/a2b71a94-90bd-4f3e-8245-3fa74fd55fda/012B2A09-36D7-42F0-9087-B58BA2EA3F16.jpeg
    The old Hitler was wrong then, as the new Putler is wrong today. History has taught us that appeasing any Hitler is the wrong thing to do, whenever he appears of the world stage.

    Replies: @John Johnson, @QCIC, @Gerard1234

    This is about the West pressuring Russia in a way that can easily lead to nuclear war. The leaders in the West are willing to risk it because they think they are wise or immortal or some other stupid reason. Why do you support this insanity?

    The West completed many provocations against Russia before Maidan, so the bigger picture has little to do with Ukraine.

    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @QCIC


    This is about the West pressuring Russia in a way that can easily lead to nuclear war.
     
    So now its Prigozhin that's taking his marching orders from the West? Or is it Shoigu or Gerasimov?
    It's always the fault of the West and never Russia's for all of the insanity going on within Russia.

    Why not just name the culprit like Ivashka has?
    https://s3-eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/cartoons-s3/styles/product_detail_image/s3/klausschwab-pugliese.jpg?itok=7QrUBXt8
    Is Klaus Schwab at it again and making the RusFed leadership look stupid once again?

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @QCIC

  66. @Mr. Hack
    @S

    Wonderful. Ukrainians accept all the help that they can get. Russian internecine warfare can only help stop the madness.

    https://static.kyivpost.com/storage/2023/06/02/96a7ad4a4508797a6ae17ad271b859aa.jpg?w=900&q=90&f=webp
    Putler opens up a jar of scorpions. No two scorpions can live in harmony; they always hunt each others down and only one remains alive.

    Replies: @QCIC

    You should ask yourself: “What is the next Russian trap the Ukrainians can blunder into?”

  67. S says:
    @S
    Prighozin (allegedly) is now claiming the Russian armed forces have obliterated a 'huge number' of Wagner troops in surprise missile strikes upon their rear encampments, that the Russian military leadership 'must be stopped', and is calling upon Russian volunteers to join his forces. [We'll see how real this claim is, if at all, in the next few hours and day(s).]


    https://news.yahoo.com/wagner-chief-vows-stop-russia-195459412.html

    "A huge number of our fighters, our comrades died."

    Wagner chief vows to 'stop' Russia after alleged attack on forces

    The council of commanders of PMC Wagner has made a decision -- the evil that the military leadership of the country brings must be stopped," Prigozhin said in a series of furious audio messages released by his spokespeople.

    "We were ready to make concessions to the defence ministry, surrender our weapons.

    "Today, seeing that we have not been broken, they conducted missile strikes at our rear camps. A huge number of our fighters, our comrades died."

    He warned Russians against resisting his forces and called on them to join him, adding "there are 25,000 of us".

    The Russian defence ministry denied the claims about the strikes, saying the statements "do not correspond to reality", and calling them a "provocation."
     

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @S

    Prigozhin is now claiming two thousand of his men were killed in the surprise attack. And (allegedly) is to lead his 25,000 man Wagnerite army on a ‘March of Justice’ on Moscow. Says it’s ‘not a military coup’.

    I’ll put this (tentatively) in the ‘New Beer Hall Putsch’ category.

    https://www.mediaite.com/news/russian-paramilitary-leader-vows-25000-troop-march-of-justice-on-moscow-to-confront-evil-behind-ukraine-war/

    Russian Paramilitary Leader Vows 25,000 Troop ‘March of Justice’ On Moscow To Confront ‘Evil’ Behind Ukraine War

    Yevgeny Prigozhin, the head of the infamous Wagner paramilitary group, vowed a “march of justice” to root out the “evil” behind what he claimed was a Russian missile strike on his troops, sparking talk of civil conflict within Russia.

    “This is not a military coup, this is a march of justice,” Prigozhin said in videos released on Friday. “Our actions do not impede the troops.”

    “The evil that the military leadership of the country brings forward must be stopped. They have forgotten the word ‘justice,’ and we will return it,” he raged, but never directly mentioned Russian President Vladimir Putin.

    “Anyone attempting resistance will be considered a threat and immediately destroyed. This includes all the checkpoints on our path and any aircraft above our heads,” he added, noting that his battle-hardened troops possess anti-aircraft missiles along with tanks and other heavy equipment.

    Prigozhin, whose mercenary troops have secured key victories for Russia in Ukraine and other battlefields across the globe like Syria, accused the Russian Ministry of Defense of murdering some 2,000 of his troops. The Wagner Group has made headlines throughout the war for its brutal tactics and targeting of civilians, as well as horrendous battlefield executions of its own members accused of desertion or defecting.

    Reuters reported that Prigozhin’s rant was accompanied by a separate “unverified video posted on a Telegram channel close to Wagner [which] showed a scene in a forest where small fires were burning and trees appeared to have been broken by force. There appeared to be one body, but no more direct evidence of any attack.”

    “The minister of defense has ordered 2,000 bodies that are being stored to be hidden so as not to show the losses,” Prigozhin said, adding:

    Those who destroyed our lads, who destroyed the lives of many tens of thousands of Russian soldiers, will be punished. I ask that no one offer resistance…

    There are 25,000 of us and we are going to figure out why chaos is happening in the country.

    Prigozhin also rebutted some of the often repeated justifications for Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, noting that neither NATO nor Ukraine posed a military threat to Russia. In a video earlier in the day, he accused the Russian Ministry of Defense of lying to the Russian people with a “story about the crazy aggression from the Ukrainian side and the plans to attack us with the entire NATO bloc.”

  68. Coup attempt in progress?

    For anyone who has ever babbled about the “Nuland coup” — congratulations, now you may get to see what a real coup looks like!

    Can’t believe this could possibly succeed, though.

  69. @John Johnson
    @QCIC

    The West set WW3 into motion by dropping out of the ABM Treaty.

    That was in 2002 which was actually during the time when Putin recognized the autonomy of Ukraine. He is on video in 2008 stating that they have no border contentions and that included Crimea. I have posted that video before but can provide it again if you would like. It was only in his later years that he reversed his own position and decided that Ukraine doesn't exist.

    But you are saying that a treaty related to nuclear arms is the cause of the war even though it wasn't mentioned by Putin in his original invasion speech?

    Since he didn't mention the ABM that means he launched the war over false pretenses.

    Do explain using logic and reason as to how Putin had no choice but to launch a military invasion of Ukraine with false pretenses over a treaty that GWB left 20 years earlier.

    Replies: @Beckow

    You should realize that what you wrote is an embarrassing and incoherent rant – you are defending the indefensible by claiming that either nobody noticed US leaving the ABM Treaty or that the criticism wasn’t timed and stated exactly as you would like it.

    That is nonsense: US dropped out of ABM and that started – or accelerated – the process towards the war where we ended up in 2022: by then the war became almost inevitable – the obvious candidate was Ukraine.

    You pretend not to understand that things change, that people can’t predict the future, that there is an obvious dynamic of give-and-take. You are an ideological hack who cheerleads the war. Still, it is quite a hole to fall into – you really don’t think that unilaterally dropping out of ABM had a drastic impact on Russia’s strategy? Why would you say something so stupid? It looks like you are being told what to write.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
    @Beckow

    You should realize that what you wrote is an embarrassing and incoherent rant – you are defending the indefensible by claiming that either nobody noticed US leaving the ABM Treaty or that the criticism wasn’t timed and stated exactly as you would like it.

    I never went on a rant about the ABM. Go ahead and quote me.

    I asked for an explanation as to why the ABM is the cause of the war.

    It was QCIC's theory and not mine. It was also not given as a reason by Putin.

    So he has to explain this theory and why Putin decided to provide false pretenses in his invasion speech.

    I haven't given my opinion on the ABM. In any case I think it is irrelevant to Putin's decision to invade Ukraine.

    Still, it is quite a hole to fall into – you really don’t think that unilaterally dropping out of ABM had a drastic impact on Russia’s strategy?

    Well go ahead and explain why the ABM would cause Russia to invade Ukraine and with leaked plans to invade Moldova.

    Explain why launching cruise missiles at apartment buildings in Kiev was a required response to GWB dropping out of the ABM in 2002. Explain how this 20 year response was needed to mitigate a treaty with the United States.

    Also explain how an invasion of Moldova was also required. Note that they have Swiss style neutrality in their constitution.

    Go ahead and explain all of this if you think it is stupid to be skeptical of an explanation that Putin himself hasn't stated. Do explain using logic and reason and be sure to explain the leaked plans of invading Moldova.

    The best explanation for the war is that Putin is playing conqueror just like Tsars and Communist dictators before him. That is the better explanation that covers all points like why Putin completely contradicted himself by stating that Finland joining NATO doesn't matter. Putin is getting old and wanted to add Ukraine to the empire. That is all there is to this bloody invasion. By adding Ukraine he would massively boost their GDP and population. Ukraine has always been more technologically advanced than Russia and contains massive mineral and agricultural reserves. By absorbing Ukraine, Belarus and Moldova he planned on recreating Imperial Russia to compete against the US and Britain. Well that plan failed.

    Putin openly admires Peter the Great and is on record stating that the great Tsars all expanded Russia. He wanted his picture up on the wall with Peter the Great at the Kremlin. Well that ain't happening as he will be viewed as a loser Tsar like Nick II.

    Prighozhin now maintains that Putin lied about the cause of the war and also believes it is about egos. I guess he is also stupid for not believing this ABM theory that Putin never stated? Hint: It's not a good sign if your best general is openly talking shit about you.

    Putin is not a man of principle and it would be wise at this point to stop bootlicking for him. Even before the war it was well known that he would poison the opposition and have his own friends pushed out of windows over a minor sleight. He is a bitter 5'3 mobster and to ascribe any type of rational explanation based on a 20 year old treaty is absurd. But by all means go ahead explain if you can.

    Replies: @QCIC, @Sean, @Mr. XYZ

  70. @QCIC
    @Matra

    I think your points might apply if the Russians moved in 2014. By 2022 a significant percentage of Ukrainians seemed to be polarized against Russia and would likely fight a modest invasion force. The central government had been supporting genocidal bombing of Russian speakers for eight years, which may imply this was a socially acceptable policy in Ukraine.

    Replies: @John Johnson

    I think your points might apply if the Russians moved in 2014. By 2022 a significant percentage of Ukrainians seemed to be polarized against Russia and would likely fight a modest invasion force.

    At best it would have gone to urban partisan warfare. Even without NATO involvement there would have been AK-47s and NLAWs from windows. So some Russian family has to learn that their son was barbecued in a tank because….. ???? Even Russians can’t explain this war as seen by the 1420 videos on youtube. Partisans in Kiev would draw it out and Russia would use Gestapo style tactics which would lead to even more sanctions. This was all a stupid plan in any scenario. As I have said many times it would have been cheaper to carve out an area of Russia for Russian Ukrainians and give them 50 acres and 500k Rubles.

    The Ukrainians don’t want to be under the boot of Putin. They never wanted to be part of Imperial Russia nor the USSR. This is an inescapable reality that was not going away. Ukrainians are not Russians and understandably do not trust them.

    Even 50k well armed and motivated militia men would be a huge headache for Russia.

    Let not forget that the Russians were defeated by Afghan militias. It’s hard to sustain an invasion when even 1% of the opposing population is willing to die trying to take out as many of your soldiers as possible. Invasions work best when the public is neutral to your rule or better yet has a minority that will collude against any resistors. That is how the Mongols were able to suppress Russia for so long. They created a wealthy monarchy that was subservient to their rule. No such alliance exists in Ukraine. The Russians in fact used the separatist militias as cannon fodder. Putin lied about creating LPR/DPR states and took them as Russian territory. The remaining wives of the separatists would likely vote for Russia to return to its borders. Former separatist leader Igor Girkin has completely turned on Putin and thinks he is a dunce when it comes to war. Girkin initially cheered the invasion but now thinks Putin has blown it.

    • Replies: @QCIC
    @John Johnson

    The war is about Western aggressive moves to corner Russia and make it a vassal of the West or a failed state.

    This is what the Russians are fighting in Ukraine. This is why Ukraine is a pawn in a proxy war.

    The Western approach is true hybrid warfare on all fronts. It is the most dangerous game in history.

    Fifth columns and NGOs in Russia--check.

    Unprecedented wide and deep economic warfare against Russia--check.

    Warm-up coups near Russia (Georgia, Kazakhstan attempt, Belarus attempt)--check.

    Coup in Ukraine

    NATO weapons in Ukraine--check.

    World-wide information war against Russia--check.

    Miscellaneous direct nuclear threats against Russia--check.

    Anti-Russian civil war in Ukraine--check.

    At some point Russia may get tired of this nonsense. I doubt their response will be what the Neocons hope for. Do you really trust Blinken, Austin, Sullivan and Milley to get ANYTHING right?

    Replies: @John Johnson

    , @Mr. XYZ
    @John Johnson


    Let not forget that the Russians were defeated by Afghan militias.
     
    Actually, Najibullah was able to hold his own ground just so long as he was still getting Russian/Soviet financial support:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Jalalabad_(1989)#:~:text=The%20Battle%20of%20Jalalabad%20is,were%20running%20low%20on%20ammunition.

    It's when the Soviet/Russian support dried up in 1992 that Najibullah finally fell. Arguably, the US would have been smarter in stepping in and beginning to directly provide support for him itself as opposed to allowing the incompetent and quarreling Mujahideen to take over Afghanistan, run it to the ground, and pave the way for the Taliban's first emergence later on in the 1990s.
  71. S says:

    The alleged strike on Prigozhin was the number two story just now on US NBC nightly news. It’s being reported that riot police are being placed around key installations in the city of Moscow.

    Below is video of what is supposed to be the Wagner encampment after the alleged surprise missile strike upon it.

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @S

    Prigozhin always glowed

  72. Dana White is serious about putting on a Zuckerberg Musk fight. Zuckerberg is in shape. Musk is 6″ taller. White says the revenues (for charity) are going to be in the 100s millions.

    • Replies: @Mikel
    @Emil Nikola Richard


    White says the revenues (for charity) are going to be in the 100s millions.
     
    I'm definitely willing to pay to see that fight if it happens. Last night I was even discussing with my wife driving to Vegas to watch it but she's probably right that it would be too expensive.
  73. @Beckow
    @John Johnson

    You should realize that what you wrote is an embarrassing and incoherent rant - you are defending the indefensible by claiming that either nobody noticed US leaving the ABM Treaty or that the criticism wasn't timed and stated exactly as you would like it.

    That is nonsense: US dropped out of ABM and that started - or accelerated - the process towards the war where we ended up in 2022: by then the war became almost inevitable - the obvious candidate was Ukraine.

    You pretend not to understand that things change, that people can't predict the future, that there is an obvious dynamic of give-and-take. You are an ideological hack who cheerleads the war. Still, it is quite a hole to fall into - you really don't think that unilaterally dropping out of ABM had a drastic impact on Russia's strategy? Why would you say something so stupid? It looks like you are being told what to write.

    Replies: @John Johnson

    You should realize that what you wrote is an embarrassing and incoherent rant – you are defending the indefensible by claiming that either nobody noticed US leaving the ABM Treaty or that the criticism wasn’t timed and stated exactly as you would like it.

    I never went on a rant about the ABM. Go ahead and quote me.

    I asked for an explanation as to why the ABM is the cause of the war.

    It was QCIC’s theory and not mine. It was also not given as a reason by Putin.

    So he has to explain this theory and why Putin decided to provide false pretenses in his invasion speech.

    I haven’t given my opinion on the ABM. In any case I think it is irrelevant to Putin’s decision to invade Ukraine.

    Still, it is quite a hole to fall into – you really don’t think that unilaterally dropping out of ABM had a drastic impact on Russia’s strategy?

    Well go ahead and explain why the ABM would cause Russia to invade Ukraine and with leaked plans to invade Moldova.

    Explain why launching cruise missiles at apartment buildings in Kiev was a required response to GWB dropping out of the ABM in 2002. Explain how this 20 year response was needed to mitigate a treaty with the United States.

    Also explain how an invasion of Moldova was also required. Note that they have Swiss style neutrality in their constitution.

    Go ahead and explain all of this if you think it is stupid to be skeptical of an explanation that Putin himself hasn’t stated. Do explain using logic and reason and be sure to explain the leaked plans of invading Moldova.

    The best explanation for the war is that Putin is playing conqueror just like Tsars and Communist dictators before him. That is the better explanation that covers all points like why Putin completely contradicted himself by stating that Finland joining NATO doesn’t matter. Putin is getting old and wanted to add Ukraine to the empire. That is all there is to this bloody invasion. By adding Ukraine he would massively boost their GDP and population. Ukraine has always been more technologically advanced than Russia and contains massive mineral and agricultural reserves. By absorbing Ukraine, Belarus and Moldova he planned on recreating Imperial Russia to compete against the US and Britain. Well that plan failed.

    Putin openly admires Peter the Great and is on record stating that the great Tsars all expanded Russia. He wanted his picture up on the wall with Peter the Great at the Kremlin. Well that ain’t happening as he will be viewed as a loser Tsar like Nick II.

    Prighozhin now maintains that Putin lied about the cause of the war and also believes it is about egos. I guess he is also stupid for not believing this ABM theory that Putin never stated? Hint: It’s not a good sign if your best general is openly talking shit about you.

    Putin is not a man of principle and it would be wise at this point to stop bootlicking for him. Even before the war it was well known that he would poison the opposition and have his own friends pushed out of windows over a minor sleight. He is a bitter 5’3 mobster and to ascribe any type of rational explanation based on a 20 year old treaty is absurd. But by all means go ahead explain if you can.

    • Replies: @QCIC
    @John Johnson

    I gave a list of a few important Western aggressive moves against Russia since the fall of the USSR and now. I know you read it, stop lying about all this. No one here has listed comparable Russian moves which precipitated these actions. The West had it in for Russia and many western leaders have said this in one way or another.

    You know full well this Ukraine mess is part of a larger picture.

    Russia would have no issue with Ukraine except for a bunch of these insane Western moves including Kiev killing Russian speakers in Ukraine very close to the Russian border. Of course they intervened, who wouldn't? Russia gave them chances to change course and make nice, but the West wouldn't have it. Ukrainians thought they were invulnerable.

    I wonder if the Russians simply do not want to mention this is really a nuclear war happening in slow motion, so the facts they emphasize in the story can change as needed to meet that constraint? Spilling the beans on the nuclear aspect may be some sort of formal escalation for them which they do not want to invoke.

    I wonder if they are at DEFCON 2? Don't forget the Belgorod submarine is operational. Great job morons.

    Replies: @Beckow

    , @Sean
    @John Johnson


    Bringing Russia in
    Prospect Article 1997
    The expansion of Nato will serve no clear defensive purpose and is likely to strengthen reactionary forces in Russia. Rodric Braithwaite, former British ambassador in Moscow, argues that acknowledging Russia's desire to be part of a European settlement is not appeasement but good sense

     


    Excerpt from George F. Kennan, “A Fateful Error,” New York Times, 05 Feb 1997

    “Why, with all the hopeful possibilities engendered by the end of the Cold War, should East-West relations become centered on the question of who would be allied with whom and, by implication, against whom in some fanciful, totally unforeseeable and most improbable future military conflict?”

    [B]luntly stated…expanding NATO would be the most fateful error of American policy in the entire post-Cold War era. Such a decision may be expected to inflame the nationalistic, anti-Western and militaristic tendencies in Russian opinion; to have an adverse effect on the development of Russian democracy; to restore the atmosphere of the cold war to East-West relations, and to impel Russian foreign policy in directions decidedly not to our liking
     

    "Impel", but it was still their decision. Yet by the same token they could not be impelled by the US to do nothing so why twist their tail? That is a very good question , however in Zbigniew Brzezinski published a suggested timetable for the Nato expasion with Ukraine penciled in for membership around 2006, so people like him thought Russia would be intimidated. Starting in 2007 with an impromptu speech at the Munich Security conference, which watching Americans like McCain snickered at.

    Although NATO was still a year away from inviting Ukraine and Georgia to become NATO member-states in 2008, Putin emphasized how Russia perceived eastward expansion as a threat:

    "I think it is obvious that NATO expansion does not have any relation with the modernisation of the Alliance itself or with ensuring security in Europe. On the contrary, it represents a serious provocation that reduces the level of mutual trust. And we have the right to ask: against whom is this expansion intended?"
     


    Earthling: The man who foresaw the Ukraine crisis

    Substack
    https://nonzero.substack.com › earthling-the-man-who-f...
    11 Feb 2022 — In a memo to then-Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, Burns wrote, “Ukrainian entry into NATO is the brightest of all red lines for the Russian
     

    Rice and Gates are still around and urging Russia be stood up to.


    Nato said its enlargement (towards Russia) was not up for discussion, because what those free and equal post Soviet countries such as Ukraine did was none of Russia's business. The eventual response of Putin was "We are fucking making it our business!", and so in 2014 he got kinetic for emphasis. By 2022 it was apparent the US and Ukraine thought Putin was scared to go further and could now be ignored. Kiev goose is cooked; does Washington finally understand the Kremlin cannot be intimidated or again deflected from their objectives a la Minsk2 in this matter which they consider vital to their national security, or will things have to get more serious yet?

    , @Mr. XYZ
    @John Johnson


    Putin openly admires Peter the Great and is on record stating that the great Tsars all expanded Russia. He wanted his picture up on the wall with Peter the Great at the Kremlin. Well that ain’t happening as he will be viewed as a loser Tsar like Nick II.
     
    The great irony, of course, is that Putin could have quickly annexed both Crimea and Donbass back in 2014 and created a fait accompli and likely gotten only minor Western sanctions placed on him and Russia in response to this. (Not invading at all would have been better, but then Putin would not have gotten a huge popularity boost back home in Russia.) Another option, of course, would have been to annex Crimea and conquer all of Novorossiya but trade back all of Novorossiya, minus Crimea, in exchange for a Ukrainian neutrality treaty, similar to what the Soviet Union did in 1955 in exchange for withdrawing from eastern Austria. I don't view Ukrainian NATO membership as existential but if Putin actually did, then the move above would have been better than what Putin actually chose to do. Ukraine was not going to trade only the Donbass in exchange for no NATO membership, especially if this also carries a risk of no EU membership as well and if the Donbass gets veto power on Ukrainian national policies in general.
  74. Wall Street Journal reporting that “Russia Issues Arrest Warrant for Wagner Chief on Charges of Mutiny”.

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/ukraine-shoots-down-russian-cruise-missile-barrage-9d9da03a?mod=hp_lead_pos1

    • LOL: Mr. XYZ
    • Replies: @John Johnson
    @Yahya

    Wall Street Journal reporting that “Russia Issues Arrest Warrant for Wagner Chief on Charges of Mutiny”.

    Well there goes the basement bootlicker theory that Prigozhin's public insolence was all grand ruse dreamt up by Putin to lull the Ukrainians into a trap. That also gives further credence to the most likely scenario which is that Bakhmut was never a trap and there really is no plan.

    I'm guessing that certain pro-Putin blog posts will conveniently disappear.

    Moscow is currently being locked down with armored vehicles. They are actually afraid of Prigozhin storming the capital.


    https://i.pinimg.com/736x/93/d2/b0/93d2b0a371abcd09aaa1c9e50e28732e.jpg

    Replies: @Sean

  75. @LondonBob
    @Mikel

    Just because you were dumb enough to fall for the deception...

    Anyway it is acknowledged they didn't think Russia would move as there were very few troops on the border, indeed Russia, until partial mobilisation, had used very few troops in the Ukraine, very much outnumbered by the Ukrainians until recently. That was why I didn't think they would invade, too few to do so, I was wrong. Still it remains, no one in their right mind thinks you could take a city of three million with forty thousand soldiers, but it turns out it was sufficient to invade, disrupt supply lines and create confusion.

    Replies: @John Johnson, @Mikel

    Well, as I said above, 2 days ago Putin left his most servile supporters in the West with egg on their faces (once again) by declaring that he stopped the assault on Kiev as a gesture of good will amid the Istanbul negotiations and actually showed some papers to the press purportedly proving this.

    Of course, those of you defending his 3D chess skills with the Kiev feint will not hesitate to double down and proclaim his 4D skills claiming now that it was a feint to carry out a subsequent feint of a good will gesture but don’t you realize how ridiculous you look?

    In any case, Putin has better things to worry about than his hapless Western supporters. According to the latest news, Prigozhin seems to be already on the move.

    • Replies: @Yevardian
    @Mikel


    In any case, Putin has better things to worry about than his hapless Western supporters. According to the latest news, Prigozhin seems to be already on the move.
     
    Prigozhin's only real ally in the MoD Surovikin has already denounced him in a (forced?) video. Prigozhin will likely be dead or on trial in a few hours, although I don't like to think what sort of effect this very public mess is going to have on the Russian army's morale.
    It also speaks quite poorly of Putin's current ability to manage the previously controlled factional infighting both within his government and the military.

    Also, worth remembering that although the August Coup went nowhere either, the indirect effects after its failure were enormous.

    Replies: @Matra, @AP

    , @LondonBob
    @Mikel

    The assault on a city of three million, with forty thousand?

    The Russians withdrew with minimal fuss, nothing messy about it, they had the upper hand. Hardly an act of genius to decide to portray something you were going to do anyway as an act of goodwill instead? Whether the deal was signed or not, they weren't staying there.

  76. @Emil Nikola Richard
    Dana White is serious about putting on a Zuckerberg Musk fight. Zuckerberg is in shape. Musk is 6" taller. White says the revenues (for charity) are going to be in the 100s millions.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X9vuwb4K-Ps&ab_channel=ThePatMcAfeeShow

    Replies: @Mikel

    White says the revenues (for charity) are going to be in the 100s millions.

    I’m definitely willing to pay to see that fight if it happens. Last night I was even discussing with my wife driving to Vegas to watch it but she’s probably right that it would be too expensive.

  77. @Mikel
    @LondonBob

    Well, as I said above, 2 days ago Putin left his most servile supporters in the West with egg on their faces (once again) by declaring that he stopped the assault on Kiev as a gesture of good will amid the Istanbul negotiations and actually showed some papers to the press purportedly proving this.

    Of course, those of you defending his 3D chess skills with the Kiev feint will not hesitate to double down and proclaim his 4D skills claiming now that it was a feint to carry out a subsequent feint of a good will gesture but don't you realize how ridiculous you look?

    In any case, Putin has better things to worry about than his hapless Western supporters. According to the latest news, Prigozhin seems to be already on the move.

    Replies: @Yevardian, @LondonBob

    In any case, Putin has better things to worry about than his hapless Western supporters. According to the latest news, Prigozhin seems to be already on the move.

    Prigozhin’s only real ally in the MoD Surovikin has already denounced him in a (forced?) video. Prigozhin will likely be dead or on trial in a few hours, although I don’t like to think what sort of effect this very public mess is going to have on the Russian army’s morale.
    It also speaks quite poorly of Putin’s current ability to manage the previously controlled factional infighting both within his government and the military.

    Also, worth remembering that although the August Coup went nowhere either, the indirect effects after its failure were enormous.

    • Replies: @Matra
    @Yevardian

    I feel bad for Prigozhin and his brave men. They deserve better. Remember Trump slaughtering hundreds of them in Syria, right after they saved Christians from being murdered by US/Israel backed Islamists. Mercenaries are so much more admirable than the glorified civil servants who make up the militaries of states.

    Replies: @keypusher

    , @AP
    @Yevardian

    The fact that these hijinks are even happening further shows that the war is not going well for Russia, contrary to wishful thinking.

    Replies: @Sean

  78. @Yahya
    Wall Street Journal reporting that “Russia Issues Arrest Warrant for Wagner Chief on Charges of Mutiny”.

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/ukraine-shoots-down-russian-cruise-missile-barrage-9d9da03a?mod=hp_lead_pos1

    Replies: @John Johnson

    Wall Street Journal reporting that “Russia Issues Arrest Warrant for Wagner Chief on Charges of Mutiny”.

    Well there goes the basement bootlicker theory that Prigozhin’s public insolence was all grand ruse dreamt up by Putin to lull the Ukrainians into a trap. That also gives further credence to the most likely scenario which is that Bakhmut was never a trap and there really is no plan.

    I’m guessing that certain pro-Putin blog posts will conveniently disappear.

    Moscow is currently being locked down with armored vehicles. They are actually afraid of Prigozhin storming the capital.

    • Replies: @Sean
    @John Johnson

    Great psychological warfare to distract from the fact that Ukraine has not had a victory since November and with a fresh force of superbly equipped and trained ten brigades to play with has nowhere got through or even to the first line of Russian defences on the ground north of Crimea that has been the major Russian gain of the SMO still held to date. Apart from making things up to distract from the PR disaster of the counter offensive fiasco, Kiev decided to launch on of their Storm Shadow missiles, actually the lighter payload French one (maybe more difficult to shoot down) on a key Crimean road link bridge.

    Great thinking if they are goal is to be in their graves, because Russia has threatened that the leadership in Kiev (“decision making centres) would be targeted if the Western long range missiles were used for strikes on those lines of communication to Crimea. I think Ukraine leadership, military equipment and army will be slowly but surely written down that order. Rely on it, a precision assassination of someone in Zelensky's circle is coming in retaliation.

    Replies: @John Johnson, @Wokechoke

  79. @John Johnson
    @Beckow

    You should realize that what you wrote is an embarrassing and incoherent rant – you are defending the indefensible by claiming that either nobody noticed US leaving the ABM Treaty or that the criticism wasn’t timed and stated exactly as you would like it.

    I never went on a rant about the ABM. Go ahead and quote me.

    I asked for an explanation as to why the ABM is the cause of the war.

    It was QCIC's theory and not mine. It was also not given as a reason by Putin.

    So he has to explain this theory and why Putin decided to provide false pretenses in his invasion speech.

    I haven't given my opinion on the ABM. In any case I think it is irrelevant to Putin's decision to invade Ukraine.

    Still, it is quite a hole to fall into – you really don’t think that unilaterally dropping out of ABM had a drastic impact on Russia’s strategy?

    Well go ahead and explain why the ABM would cause Russia to invade Ukraine and with leaked plans to invade Moldova.

    Explain why launching cruise missiles at apartment buildings in Kiev was a required response to GWB dropping out of the ABM in 2002. Explain how this 20 year response was needed to mitigate a treaty with the United States.

    Also explain how an invasion of Moldova was also required. Note that they have Swiss style neutrality in their constitution.

    Go ahead and explain all of this if you think it is stupid to be skeptical of an explanation that Putin himself hasn't stated. Do explain using logic and reason and be sure to explain the leaked plans of invading Moldova.

    The best explanation for the war is that Putin is playing conqueror just like Tsars and Communist dictators before him. That is the better explanation that covers all points like why Putin completely contradicted himself by stating that Finland joining NATO doesn't matter. Putin is getting old and wanted to add Ukraine to the empire. That is all there is to this bloody invasion. By adding Ukraine he would massively boost their GDP and population. Ukraine has always been more technologically advanced than Russia and contains massive mineral and agricultural reserves. By absorbing Ukraine, Belarus and Moldova he planned on recreating Imperial Russia to compete against the US and Britain. Well that plan failed.

    Putin openly admires Peter the Great and is on record stating that the great Tsars all expanded Russia. He wanted his picture up on the wall with Peter the Great at the Kremlin. Well that ain't happening as he will be viewed as a loser Tsar like Nick II.

    Prighozhin now maintains that Putin lied about the cause of the war and also believes it is about egos. I guess he is also stupid for not believing this ABM theory that Putin never stated? Hint: It's not a good sign if your best general is openly talking shit about you.

    Putin is not a man of principle and it would be wise at this point to stop bootlicking for him. Even before the war it was well known that he would poison the opposition and have his own friends pushed out of windows over a minor sleight. He is a bitter 5'3 mobster and to ascribe any type of rational explanation based on a 20 year old treaty is absurd. But by all means go ahead explain if you can.

    Replies: @QCIC, @Sean, @Mr. XYZ

    I gave a list of a few important Western aggressive moves against Russia since the fall of the USSR and now. I know you read it, stop lying about all this. No one here has listed comparable Russian moves which precipitated these actions. The West had it in for Russia and many western leaders have said this in one way or another.

    You know full well this Ukraine mess is part of a larger picture.

    Russia would have no issue with Ukraine except for a bunch of these insane Western moves including Kiev killing Russian speakers in Ukraine very close to the Russian border. Of course they intervened, who wouldn’t? Russia gave them chances to change course and make nice, but the West wouldn’t have it. Ukrainians thought they were invulnerable.

    I wonder if the Russians simply do not want to mention this is really a nuclear war happening in slow motion, so the facts they emphasize in the story can change as needed to meet that constraint? Spilling the beans on the nuclear aspect may be some sort of formal escalation for them which they do not want to invoke.

    I wonder if they are at DEFCON 2? Don’t forget the Belgorod submarine is operational. Great job morons.

    • Replies: @Beckow
    @QCIC

    This JJ guy is not capable of responding to factual points. Look how he runs away every time we ask him a specific question. "Moldova" for god's sake? Even better, "a leaked plan to invade Moldova" means to JJ that Putin is Peter The Great, or something stupid like that. He has no answers, so he escapes into absurdity - it is something Anglos do a lot and think that nobody sees through it. But it is very transparent - they run away from a normal discussion when someone asks about ABM, Kosovo, Iraq, Nato in Ukraine, Kiev's bombing of Donbas, banning Russian after Maidan, etc...it is infantile.

    JJ will not address how extremely destabilizing was US decision to drop out of the ABM Treaty. Until he does, it is best to just ignore him. He has told us about this incredible "winning" offensive by Kiev that looks like a dud. Now he tells us about Prigozhin or whomever changing topics to run away. Tomorrow he will drop Prigozhin and tell us about other cacamonie 'news', or 'predictions'. It is a technique - scream and shout to hide one's intentions and what is going on......like good British clowns they are...:)

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @Boethiuss, @AP, @John Johnson

  80. @John Johnson
    @QCIC

    I think your points might apply if the Russians moved in 2014. By 2022 a significant percentage of Ukrainians seemed to be polarized against Russia and would likely fight a modest invasion force.

    At best it would have gone to urban partisan warfare. Even without NATO involvement there would have been AK-47s and NLAWs from windows. So some Russian family has to learn that their son was barbecued in a tank because..... ???? Even Russians can't explain this war as seen by the 1420 videos on youtube. Partisans in Kiev would draw it out and Russia would use Gestapo style tactics which would lead to even more sanctions. This was all a stupid plan in any scenario. As I have said many times it would have been cheaper to carve out an area of Russia for Russian Ukrainians and give them 50 acres and 500k Rubles.

    The Ukrainians don't want to be under the boot of Putin. They never wanted to be part of Imperial Russia nor the USSR. This is an inescapable reality that was not going away. Ukrainians are not Russians and understandably do not trust them.

    Even 50k well armed and motivated militia men would be a huge headache for Russia.

    Let not forget that the Russians were defeated by Afghan militias. It's hard to sustain an invasion when even 1% of the opposing population is willing to die trying to take out as many of your soldiers as possible. Invasions work best when the public is neutral to your rule or better yet has a minority that will collude against any resistors. That is how the Mongols were able to suppress Russia for so long. They created a wealthy monarchy that was subservient to their rule. No such alliance exists in Ukraine. The Russians in fact used the separatist militias as cannon fodder. Putin lied about creating LPR/DPR states and took them as Russian territory. The remaining wives of the separatists would likely vote for Russia to return to its borders. Former separatist leader Igor Girkin has completely turned on Putin and thinks he is a dunce when it comes to war. Girkin initially cheered the invasion but now thinks Putin has blown it.

    Replies: @QCIC, @Mr. XYZ

    The war is about Western aggressive moves to corner Russia and make it a vassal of the West or a failed state.

    This is what the Russians are fighting in Ukraine. This is why Ukraine is a pawn in a proxy war.

    The Western approach is true hybrid warfare on all fronts. It is the most dangerous game in history.

    Fifth columns and NGOs in Russia–check.

    Unprecedented wide and deep economic warfare against Russia–check.

    Warm-up coups near Russia (Georgia, Kazakhstan attempt, Belarus attempt)–check.

    Coup in Ukraine

    NATO weapons in Ukraine–check.

    World-wide information war against Russia–check.

    Miscellaneous direct nuclear threats against Russia–check.

    Anti-Russian civil war in Ukraine–check.

    At some point Russia may get tired of this nonsense. I doubt their response will be what the Neocons hope for. Do you really trust Blinken, Austin, Sullivan and Milley to get ANYTHING right?

    • Replies: @John Johnson
    @QCIC

    The war is about Western aggressive moves to corner Russia and make it a vassal of the West or a failed state.

    Yet another excuse. The only consistency among Putin supporters is that they can't maintain a consistent explanation for the war.

    You told me in this very thread that it is about the ABM and now it is about countering Western plans to make Russia a vassal state.

    You can't even maintain a consistent explanation over a 24 hour period.

    In the 1420 videos it is clear that Russians themselves can't explain why the war exists.

    Putin himself has given at least four different explanations.

    Coup in Ukraine

    Do explain how there was a coup when the removed pro-Russian president was disavowed by his own party as a corrupt criminal.

    Replies: @QCIC

  81. Unfortunately there doesn’t seem to be any sign that the Wagner columns exist anywhere other than in Prighozin’s imagination.

    • Agree: LondonBob
    • Replies: @AP
    @Keypusher

    Probably not, but it has been late at night out there so one would not expect sightings and filmings yet. There are videos of supposes shooting in Rostov.

    This may be a column:



    https://twitter.com/Global_Mil_Info/status/1672414603081383937?s=20

    https://twitter.com/AricToler/status/1672416185638436864?s=20

    Replies: @Sean

  82. @QCIC
    @Mr. XYZ

    Dropping out of the ABM Treaty was a mistake but was not accidental. This was a major early step in the long-term policy to pressure Russia militarily which continued with subsequent administrations. They are all more or less captured by the Neocons so the consistently hostile policy toward Russia is no surprise.

    Now that the USA and NATO counties are publicly involved in Ukraine, Russia has suspended the New START process (though not cancelled IIRC). So in the next round of BS the Neocons will paint Russia as the bad guy and pretend all the prior Western extremely aggressive moves didn't happen.

    Our 'leaders' do kindergarten-level shit like this all the time.

    The future challenge will be that the West needs to make serious one-sided concessions to revive the arms control negotiation process. That will be politically challenging. A multiparty negotiation might take some of the sting out of that but also leads us straight down the drain to globalism.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    I’m quite content with the US returning to the ABM Treaty as a way of reducing tensions with Russia. This treaty won’t hurt our ability to effectively respond to China, will it?

    • Replies: @QCIC
    @Mr. XYZ

    That treaty is gone forever.

    We will be lucky if something new can be created. It would have been much easier to apply unified pressure on China and Israel to make them join the existing treaty.

    Replies: @A123

  83. @John Johnson
    @Beckow

    You should realize that what you wrote is an embarrassing and incoherent rant – you are defending the indefensible by claiming that either nobody noticed US leaving the ABM Treaty or that the criticism wasn’t timed and stated exactly as you would like it.

    I never went on a rant about the ABM. Go ahead and quote me.

    I asked for an explanation as to why the ABM is the cause of the war.

    It was QCIC's theory and not mine. It was also not given as a reason by Putin.

    So he has to explain this theory and why Putin decided to provide false pretenses in his invasion speech.

    I haven't given my opinion on the ABM. In any case I think it is irrelevant to Putin's decision to invade Ukraine.

    Still, it is quite a hole to fall into – you really don’t think that unilaterally dropping out of ABM had a drastic impact on Russia’s strategy?

    Well go ahead and explain why the ABM would cause Russia to invade Ukraine and with leaked plans to invade Moldova.

    Explain why launching cruise missiles at apartment buildings in Kiev was a required response to GWB dropping out of the ABM in 2002. Explain how this 20 year response was needed to mitigate a treaty with the United States.

    Also explain how an invasion of Moldova was also required. Note that they have Swiss style neutrality in their constitution.

    Go ahead and explain all of this if you think it is stupid to be skeptical of an explanation that Putin himself hasn't stated. Do explain using logic and reason and be sure to explain the leaked plans of invading Moldova.

    The best explanation for the war is that Putin is playing conqueror just like Tsars and Communist dictators before him. That is the better explanation that covers all points like why Putin completely contradicted himself by stating that Finland joining NATO doesn't matter. Putin is getting old and wanted to add Ukraine to the empire. That is all there is to this bloody invasion. By adding Ukraine he would massively boost their GDP and population. Ukraine has always been more technologically advanced than Russia and contains massive mineral and agricultural reserves. By absorbing Ukraine, Belarus and Moldova he planned on recreating Imperial Russia to compete against the US and Britain. Well that plan failed.

    Putin openly admires Peter the Great and is on record stating that the great Tsars all expanded Russia. He wanted his picture up on the wall with Peter the Great at the Kremlin. Well that ain't happening as he will be viewed as a loser Tsar like Nick II.

    Prighozhin now maintains that Putin lied about the cause of the war and also believes it is about egos. I guess he is also stupid for not believing this ABM theory that Putin never stated? Hint: It's not a good sign if your best general is openly talking shit about you.

    Putin is not a man of principle and it would be wise at this point to stop bootlicking for him. Even before the war it was well known that he would poison the opposition and have his own friends pushed out of windows over a minor sleight. He is a bitter 5'3 mobster and to ascribe any type of rational explanation based on a 20 year old treaty is absurd. But by all means go ahead explain if you can.

    Replies: @QCIC, @Sean, @Mr. XYZ

    Bringing Russia in
    Prospect Article 1997
    The expansion of Nato will serve no clear defensive purpose and is likely to strengthen reactionary forces in Russia. Rodric Braithwaite, former British ambassador in Moscow, argues that acknowledging Russia’s desire to be part of a European settlement is not appeasement but good sense

    Excerpt from George F. Kennan, “A Fateful Error,” New York Times, 05 Feb 1997

    “Why, with all the hopeful possibilities engendered by the end of the Cold War, should East-West relations become centered on the question of who would be allied with whom and, by implication, against whom in some fanciful, totally unforeseeable and most improbable future military conflict?”

    [B]luntly stated…expanding NATO would be the most fateful error of American policy in the entire post-Cold War era. Such a decision may be expected to inflame the nationalistic, anti-Western and militaristic tendencies in Russian opinion; to have an adverse effect on the development of Russian democracy; to restore the atmosphere of the cold war to East-West relations, and to impel Russian foreign policy in directions decidedly not to our liking

    “Impel”, but it was still their decision. Yet by the same token they could not be impelled by the US to do nothing so why twist their tail? That is a very good question , however in Zbigniew Brzezinski published a suggested timetable for the Nato expasion with Ukraine penciled in for membership around 2006, so people like him thought Russia would be intimidated. Starting in 2007 with an impromptu speech at the Munich Security conference, which watching Americans like McCain snickered at.

    Although NATO was still a year away from inviting Ukraine and Georgia to become NATO member-states in 2008, Putin emphasized how Russia perceived eastward expansion as a threat:

    “I think it is obvious that NATO expansion does not have any relation with the modernisation of the Alliance itself or with ensuring security in Europe. On the contrary, it represents a serious provocation that reduces the level of mutual trust. And we have the right to ask: against whom is this expansion intended?”

    Earthling: The man who foresaw the Ukraine crisis

    Substack
    https://nonzero.substack.com › earthling-the-man-who-f…
    11 Feb 2022 — In a memo to then-Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, Burns wrote, “Ukrainian entry into NATO is the brightest of all red lines for the Russian

    Rice and Gates are still around and urging Russia be stood up to.

    Nato said its enlargement (towards Russia) was not up for discussion, because what those free and equal post Soviet countries such as Ukraine did was none of Russia’s business. The eventual response of Putin was “We are fucking making it our business!”, and so in 2014 he got kinetic for emphasis. By 2022 it was apparent the US and Ukraine thought Putin was scared to go further and could now be ignored. Kiev goose is cooked; does Washington finally understand the Kremlin cannot be intimidated or again deflected from their objectives a la Minsk2 in this matter which they consider vital to their national security, or will things have to get more serious yet?

  84. @John Johnson
    @QCIC

    I think your points might apply if the Russians moved in 2014. By 2022 a significant percentage of Ukrainians seemed to be polarized against Russia and would likely fight a modest invasion force.

    At best it would have gone to urban partisan warfare. Even without NATO involvement there would have been AK-47s and NLAWs from windows. So some Russian family has to learn that their son was barbecued in a tank because..... ???? Even Russians can't explain this war as seen by the 1420 videos on youtube. Partisans in Kiev would draw it out and Russia would use Gestapo style tactics which would lead to even more sanctions. This was all a stupid plan in any scenario. As I have said many times it would have been cheaper to carve out an area of Russia for Russian Ukrainians and give them 50 acres and 500k Rubles.

    The Ukrainians don't want to be under the boot of Putin. They never wanted to be part of Imperial Russia nor the USSR. This is an inescapable reality that was not going away. Ukrainians are not Russians and understandably do not trust them.

    Even 50k well armed and motivated militia men would be a huge headache for Russia.

    Let not forget that the Russians were defeated by Afghan militias. It's hard to sustain an invasion when even 1% of the opposing population is willing to die trying to take out as many of your soldiers as possible. Invasions work best when the public is neutral to your rule or better yet has a minority that will collude against any resistors. That is how the Mongols were able to suppress Russia for so long. They created a wealthy monarchy that was subservient to their rule. No such alliance exists in Ukraine. The Russians in fact used the separatist militias as cannon fodder. Putin lied about creating LPR/DPR states and took them as Russian territory. The remaining wives of the separatists would likely vote for Russia to return to its borders. Former separatist leader Igor Girkin has completely turned on Putin and thinks he is a dunce when it comes to war. Girkin initially cheered the invasion but now thinks Putin has blown it.

    Replies: @QCIC, @Mr. XYZ

    Let not forget that the Russians were defeated by Afghan militias.

    Actually, Najibullah was able to hold his own ground just so long as he was still getting Russian/Soviet financial support:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Jalalabad_(1989)#:~:text=The%20Battle%20of%20Jalalabad%20is,were%20running%20low%20on%20ammunition.

    It’s when the Soviet/Russian support dried up in 1992 that Najibullah finally fell. Arguably, the US would have been smarter in stepping in and beginning to directly provide support for him itself as opposed to allowing the incompetent and quarreling Mujahideen to take over Afghanistan, run it to the ground, and pave the way for the Taliban’s first emergence later on in the 1990s.

  85. @John Johnson
    @Beckow

    You should realize that what you wrote is an embarrassing and incoherent rant – you are defending the indefensible by claiming that either nobody noticed US leaving the ABM Treaty or that the criticism wasn’t timed and stated exactly as you would like it.

    I never went on a rant about the ABM. Go ahead and quote me.

    I asked for an explanation as to why the ABM is the cause of the war.

    It was QCIC's theory and not mine. It was also not given as a reason by Putin.

    So he has to explain this theory and why Putin decided to provide false pretenses in his invasion speech.

    I haven't given my opinion on the ABM. In any case I think it is irrelevant to Putin's decision to invade Ukraine.

    Still, it is quite a hole to fall into – you really don’t think that unilaterally dropping out of ABM had a drastic impact on Russia’s strategy?

    Well go ahead and explain why the ABM would cause Russia to invade Ukraine and with leaked plans to invade Moldova.

    Explain why launching cruise missiles at apartment buildings in Kiev was a required response to GWB dropping out of the ABM in 2002. Explain how this 20 year response was needed to mitigate a treaty with the United States.

    Also explain how an invasion of Moldova was also required. Note that they have Swiss style neutrality in their constitution.

    Go ahead and explain all of this if you think it is stupid to be skeptical of an explanation that Putin himself hasn't stated. Do explain using logic and reason and be sure to explain the leaked plans of invading Moldova.

    The best explanation for the war is that Putin is playing conqueror just like Tsars and Communist dictators before him. That is the better explanation that covers all points like why Putin completely contradicted himself by stating that Finland joining NATO doesn't matter. Putin is getting old and wanted to add Ukraine to the empire. That is all there is to this bloody invasion. By adding Ukraine he would massively boost their GDP and population. Ukraine has always been more technologically advanced than Russia and contains massive mineral and agricultural reserves. By absorbing Ukraine, Belarus and Moldova he planned on recreating Imperial Russia to compete against the US and Britain. Well that plan failed.

    Putin openly admires Peter the Great and is on record stating that the great Tsars all expanded Russia. He wanted his picture up on the wall with Peter the Great at the Kremlin. Well that ain't happening as he will be viewed as a loser Tsar like Nick II.

    Prighozhin now maintains that Putin lied about the cause of the war and also believes it is about egos. I guess he is also stupid for not believing this ABM theory that Putin never stated? Hint: It's not a good sign if your best general is openly talking shit about you.

    Putin is not a man of principle and it would be wise at this point to stop bootlicking for him. Even before the war it was well known that he would poison the opposition and have his own friends pushed out of windows over a minor sleight. He is a bitter 5'3 mobster and to ascribe any type of rational explanation based on a 20 year old treaty is absurd. But by all means go ahead explain if you can.

    Replies: @QCIC, @Sean, @Mr. XYZ

    Putin openly admires Peter the Great and is on record stating that the great Tsars all expanded Russia. He wanted his picture up on the wall with Peter the Great at the Kremlin. Well that ain’t happening as he will be viewed as a loser Tsar like Nick II.

    The great irony, of course, is that Putin could have quickly annexed both Crimea and Donbass back in 2014 and created a fait accompli and likely gotten only minor Western sanctions placed on him and Russia in response to this. (Not invading at all would have been better, but then Putin would not have gotten a huge popularity boost back home in Russia.) Another option, of course, would have been to annex Crimea and conquer all of Novorossiya but trade back all of Novorossiya, minus Crimea, in exchange for a Ukrainian neutrality treaty, similar to what the Soviet Union did in 1955 in exchange for withdrawing from eastern Austria. I don’t view Ukrainian NATO membership as existential but if Putin actually did, then the move above would have been better than what Putin actually chose to do. Ukraine was not going to trade only the Donbass in exchange for no NATO membership, especially if this also carries a risk of no EU membership as well and if the Donbass gets veto power on Ukrainian national policies in general.

  86. @Yevardian
    @Mikel


    In any case, Putin has better things to worry about than his hapless Western supporters. According to the latest news, Prigozhin seems to be already on the move.
     
    Prigozhin's only real ally in the MoD Surovikin has already denounced him in a (forced?) video. Prigozhin will likely be dead or on trial in a few hours, although I don't like to think what sort of effect this very public mess is going to have on the Russian army's morale.
    It also speaks quite poorly of Putin's current ability to manage the previously controlled factional infighting both within his government and the military.

    Also, worth remembering that although the August Coup went nowhere either, the indirect effects after its failure were enormous.

    Replies: @Matra, @AP

    I feel bad for Prigozhin and his brave men. They deserve better. Remember Trump slaughtering hundreds of them in Syria, right after they saved Christians from being murdered by US/Israel backed Islamists. Mercenaries are so much more admirable than the glorified civil servants who make up the militaries of states.

    • Replies: @keypusher
    @Matra


    Mercenaries are so much more admirable than the glorified civil servants who make up the militaries of states.

     

    These, in the days when heaven was falling,
    The hour when earth's foundations fled,
    Followed their mercenary calling
    And took their wages and are dead.

    Their shoulders held the sky suspended;
    They stood, and the earth's foundations stay;
    What God abandoned, these defended,
    And saved the sum of things for pay.

    https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/57275/epitaph-on-an-army-of-mercenaries
  87. @John Johnson
    @Yahya

    Wall Street Journal reporting that “Russia Issues Arrest Warrant for Wagner Chief on Charges of Mutiny”.

    Well there goes the basement bootlicker theory that Prigozhin's public insolence was all grand ruse dreamt up by Putin to lull the Ukrainians into a trap. That also gives further credence to the most likely scenario which is that Bakhmut was never a trap and there really is no plan.

    I'm guessing that certain pro-Putin blog posts will conveniently disappear.

    Moscow is currently being locked down with armored vehicles. They are actually afraid of Prigozhin storming the capital.


    https://i.pinimg.com/736x/93/d2/b0/93d2b0a371abcd09aaa1c9e50e28732e.jpg

    Replies: @Sean

    Great psychological warfare to distract from the fact that Ukraine has not had a victory since November and with a fresh force of superbly equipped and trained ten brigades to play with has nowhere got through or even to the first line of Russian defences on the ground north of Crimea that has been the major Russian gain of the SMO still held to date. Apart from making things up to distract from the PR disaster of the counter offensive fiasco, Kiev decided to launch on of their Storm Shadow missiles, actually the lighter payload French one (maybe more difficult to shoot down) on a key Crimean road link bridge.

    Great thinking if they are goal is to be in their graves, because Russia has threatened that the leadership in Kiev (“decision making centres) would be targeted if the Western long range missiles were used for strikes on those lines of communication to Crimea. I think Ukraine leadership, military equipment and army will be slowly but surely written down that order. Rely on it, a precision assassination of someone in Zelensky’s circle is coming in retaliation.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
    @Sean

    Great psychological warfare to distract from the fact that Ukraine has not had a victory since November and with a fresh force of superbly equipped and trained ten brigades to play with has nowhere got through or even to the first line of Russian defences on the ground north of Crimea that has been the major Russian gain of the SMO still held to date.

    The Nazis took Ukraine in a month and Russia never fully took Bakhmut over nearly a year. A former city of 70k that is now in ruin. When this war started we were told that Russia would crush Ukraine within weeks.

    But I agree that the Prigozhin situation is excellent psychological warfare. It will absolutely undermine the Russian State TV narrative of Putin being in control of the situation. Thank you very much Prigozhin for donating your services to Ukraine. You are humiliating Putin and Russia. Well done.

    As for the offensive it is too early to judge. Offensives of this scale in modern warfare normally take months. We haven't seen the bulk of the armored attacks and the Kremlin is lying about destroying 60 leopards. They would constantly show images of them on State TV if that were true.

    Russia has heavily mined defensives and anyone expecting some quick march on Melitopol like the movies really doesn't understand how modern warfare works. There however is still very much the potential for a Russian rout so it is really just something to watch at this point.

    Kiev decided to launch on of their Storm Shadow missiles, actually the lighter payload French one (maybe more difficult to shoot down) on a key Crimean road link bridge

    It definitely needs to be hit again.

    I think Ukraine leadership, military equipment and army will be slowly but surely written down that order. Rely on it, a precision assassination of someone in Zelensky’s circle is coming in retaliation.

    Ritter and MacGregor have told us that Ukraine is weeks away from capitulation for over a year. Larry C Johnson and Moon of Alabama told us that Prigozhin was just an elaborate play by Putin.

    This war is simply not going well for Russia. I don't see why it is so difficult for Putin's defenders to make this simple admission. They seem to have a weird alpha male attachment to him like Africans and their Big Man leaders. It's really creepy. I openly support Ukraine but that doesn't mean I have some weird attachment to Zelensky. I think he has done a fine job but I've also been critical of him in numerous areas. He made a huge mistake early in the war by not putting the military on defense in the north.

    Replies: @A123, @Sean, @Wokechoke

    , @Wokechoke
    @Sean

    The defense around Tokmak was down to civil engineering. I’d assume that Shoigu and Surovikin will claim that they did it.

    Replies: @Sean

  88. @QCIC
    @John Johnson

    I gave a list of a few important Western aggressive moves against Russia since the fall of the USSR and now. I know you read it, stop lying about all this. No one here has listed comparable Russian moves which precipitated these actions. The West had it in for Russia and many western leaders have said this in one way or another.

    You know full well this Ukraine mess is part of a larger picture.

    Russia would have no issue with Ukraine except for a bunch of these insane Western moves including Kiev killing Russian speakers in Ukraine very close to the Russian border. Of course they intervened, who wouldn't? Russia gave them chances to change course and make nice, but the West wouldn't have it. Ukrainians thought they were invulnerable.

    I wonder if the Russians simply do not want to mention this is really a nuclear war happening in slow motion, so the facts they emphasize in the story can change as needed to meet that constraint? Spilling the beans on the nuclear aspect may be some sort of formal escalation for them which they do not want to invoke.

    I wonder if they are at DEFCON 2? Don't forget the Belgorod submarine is operational. Great job morons.

    Replies: @Beckow

    This JJ guy is not capable of responding to factual points. Look how he runs away every time we ask him a specific question. “Moldova” for god’s sake? Even better, “a leaked plan to invade Moldova” means to JJ that Putin is Peter The Great, or something stupid like that. He has no answers, so he escapes into absurdity – it is something Anglos do a lot and think that nobody sees through it. But it is very transparent – they run away from a normal discussion when someone asks about ABM, Kosovo, Iraq, Nato in Ukraine, Kiev’s bombing of Donbas, banning Russian after Maidan, etc…it is infantile.

    JJ will not address how extremely destabilizing was US decision to drop out of the ABM Treaty. Until he does, it is best to just ignore him. He has told us about this incredible “winning” offensive by Kiev that looks like a dud. Now he tells us about Prigozhin or whomever changing topics to run away. Tomorrow he will drop Prigozhin and tell us about other cacamonie ‘news’, or ‘predictions’. It is a technique – scream and shout to hide one’s intentions and what is going on……like good British clowns they are…:)

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @Beckow

    Johnson was probably a resident in the Caucasus. Form what I can tell Baku or Tbilisi. Probably involved in the Chechen wars.

    Probably knows the family that did the Boston Bombing. That last one was speculation.

    Replies: @QCIC

    , @Boethiuss
    @Beckow


    Now he tells us about Prigozhin or whomever changing topics to run away. Tomorrow he will drop Prigozhin and tell us about.......
     
    Changing topics? Oh my fuccing word!!

    Obviously any responsible commenter of the situation has to address random bullshit grievance theories like ABM (or Russian language regulation in Donbas, or whatever).

    Wagner PMC in open battle against the Russian MoD, in control of Rostov and Voroneh and advancing on Moscow, that's obviously a distraction.

    Replies: @Beckow

    , @AP
    @Beckow

    If Putin falls will you become Prigozhin's lackey?

    Or revert to Orban's lackey?

    You will have difficult decisions to make, Beckow. Whose boots to lick?

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Wokechoke

    , @John Johnson
    @Beckow

    This JJ guy is not capable of responding to factual points. Look how he runs away every time we ask him a specific question. “Moldova” for god’s sake?

    Are you claiming the leaked plan to invade Moldova is fake?

    Also the leaked plan to absorb Belarus is fake?

    All fake? Is that your position?

    Putin is just a really swell guy that would never do anything like that? All just lies? Remember when Putin's defenders said the same thing about the leaked plans to invade Ukraine? Scott Ritter is in fact on record stating that the idea is outrageous because Russia would never do such a thing. Then he switched to the position that the war was over. Now he claims that the Russia is about to win. Right Scott.

    JJ will not address how extremely destabilizing was US decision to drop out of the ABM Treaty.

    I asked how invading Ukraine changes the nuclear situation with the United States.

    Do explain how the invasion mitigates a treaty from 20 years ago.

    Putin has not cited the ABM as a cause so do explain this theory.

    I am in agreement with Prigozhin which is that the war was based on lies and Ukraine was never a security threat to Russia. Better hope that Putin takes him out so you can ignore him as well.

    Oh and Igor Girkin thinks Putin is a dunce when it comes to war. That is the former DPR leader that initially supported the invasion.

    You might want to reassess your determination to defend Putin. He is losing supporters by the day.

    Replies: @Beckow

  89. @Keypusher
    Unfortunately there doesn’t seem to be any sign that the Wagner columns exist anywhere other than in Prighozin’s imagination.

    Replies: @AP

    Probably not, but it has been late at night out there so one would not expect sightings and filmings yet. There are videos of supposes shooting in Rostov.

    This may be a column:

    [MORE]

    • Thanks: keypusher
    • Replies: @Sean
    @AP

    https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/923492028264181761/mvxJigsP_400x400.jpg

  90. @Matra
    @Yevardian

    I feel bad for Prigozhin and his brave men. They deserve better. Remember Trump slaughtering hundreds of them in Syria, right after they saved Christians from being murdered by US/Israel backed Islamists. Mercenaries are so much more admirable than the glorified civil servants who make up the militaries of states.

    Replies: @keypusher

    Mercenaries are so much more admirable than the glorified civil servants who make up the militaries of states.

    These, in the days when heaven was falling,
    The hour when earth’s foundations fled,
    Followed their mercenary calling
    And took their wages and are dead.

    Their shoulders held the sky suspended;
    They stood, and the earth’s foundations stay;
    What God abandoned, these defended,
    And saved the sum of things for pay.

    https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/57275/epitaph-on-an-army-of-mercenaries

  91. @Yevardian
    @Mikel


    In any case, Putin has better things to worry about than his hapless Western supporters. According to the latest news, Prigozhin seems to be already on the move.
     
    Prigozhin's only real ally in the MoD Surovikin has already denounced him in a (forced?) video. Prigozhin will likely be dead or on trial in a few hours, although I don't like to think what sort of effect this very public mess is going to have on the Russian army's morale.
    It also speaks quite poorly of Putin's current ability to manage the previously controlled factional infighting both within his government and the military.

    Also, worth remembering that although the August Coup went nowhere either, the indirect effects after its failure were enormous.

    Replies: @Matra, @AP

    The fact that these hijinks are even happening further shows that the war is not going well for Russia, contrary to wishful thinking.

    • Replies: @Sean
    @AP

    Prigozhin is no geopolitical strategist, so his ideas about what impelled Russia to take on the West's Ukrainian sockpuppet are unlikely to be of much value. Psychological warfare only achieves concrete results in conjunction with battlefield advances. A coruscating use of both together was in the Kharkov offensive. Ukraine is good and getting better at starting destabilising rumors. Both Putin and Zelensky are going to lose people from their inner circle before long. The Russians have as good as said they would kill someone like Oleksandr Syrsky if the lines of communication to Crimea are attacked with Storm Shadow with has now happened.

    But unfortunately making a dent in the rested and refitted dug in Russian army behemoth on the battlefield is now beyond Ukraine. The relative gain in fighting power in the field has been all Russia's. Ukraine ought to have taken advice from the West and struck when the iron was hot back in December when while they lacked equipment there were no Russian fortifications to overcome, and Bakhnut had not restored Russian faith in their arms. Back then Ukraine had all the psychological momentum and the Russians were disorganised, whereas currently Russian command, control and confidence has been restored. Their dug outs are better camouflaged and deeper than the Ukrainian ones. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t_f2byc3TUg You have got to follow up a success with determination in a timely fashion; failing to do that is as bad as needlessly retreating.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @AP

  92. @S
    The alleged strike on Prigozhin was the number two story just now on US NBC nightly news. It's being reported that riot police are being placed around key installations in the city of Moscow.

    Below is video of what is supposed to be the Wagner encampment after the alleged surprise missile strike upon it.

    https://youtu.be/37eK9cVq-ZU

    Replies: @Wokechoke

    Prigozhin always glowed

  93. @Beckow
    @QCIC

    This JJ guy is not capable of responding to factual points. Look how he runs away every time we ask him a specific question. "Moldova" for god's sake? Even better, "a leaked plan to invade Moldova" means to JJ that Putin is Peter The Great, or something stupid like that. He has no answers, so he escapes into absurdity - it is something Anglos do a lot and think that nobody sees through it. But it is very transparent - they run away from a normal discussion when someone asks about ABM, Kosovo, Iraq, Nato in Ukraine, Kiev's bombing of Donbas, banning Russian after Maidan, etc...it is infantile.

    JJ will not address how extremely destabilizing was US decision to drop out of the ABM Treaty. Until he does, it is best to just ignore him. He has told us about this incredible "winning" offensive by Kiev that looks like a dud. Now he tells us about Prigozhin or whomever changing topics to run away. Tomorrow he will drop Prigozhin and tell us about other cacamonie 'news', or 'predictions'. It is a technique - scream and shout to hide one's intentions and what is going on......like good British clowns they are...:)

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @Boethiuss, @AP, @John Johnson

    Johnson was probably a resident in the Caucasus. Form what I can tell Baku or Tbilisi. Probably involved in the Chechen wars.

    Probably knows the family that did the Boston Bombing. That last one was speculation.

    • Replies: @QCIC
    @Wokechoke

    Maybe.

    My guess is US Army or Hasbara troll. Smart enough to know better, barely. Probably on the fence with these things, just doing his job like a good little troll.

    Is a tough job if one has a conscience. Now he can never be trusted on anything, ever.

    Replies: @Wokechoke

  94. @Wokechoke
    @Beckow

    Johnson was probably a resident in the Caucasus. Form what I can tell Baku or Tbilisi. Probably involved in the Chechen wars.

    Probably knows the family that did the Boston Bombing. That last one was speculation.

    Replies: @QCIC

    Maybe.

    My guess is US Army or Hasbara troll. Smart enough to know better, barely. Probably on the fence with these things, just doing his job like a good little troll.

    Is a tough job if one has a conscience. Now he can never be trusted on anything, ever.

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @QCIC

    By resident I mean an embassy guy or a CIA geezer.

  95. @QCIC
    @Wokechoke

    Maybe.

    My guess is US Army or Hasbara troll. Smart enough to know better, barely. Probably on the fence with these things, just doing his job like a good little troll.

    Is a tough job if one has a conscience. Now he can never be trusted on anything, ever.

    Replies: @Wokechoke

    By resident I mean an embassy guy or a CIA geezer.

    • Thanks: QCIC
  96. @AP
    @Yevardian

    The fact that these hijinks are even happening further shows that the war is not going well for Russia, contrary to wishful thinking.

    Replies: @Sean

    Prigozhin is no geopolitical strategist, so his ideas about what impelled Russia to take on the West’s Ukrainian sockpuppet are unlikely to be of much value. Psychological warfare only achieves concrete results in conjunction with battlefield advances. A coruscating use of both together was in the Kharkov offensive. Ukraine is good and getting better at starting destabilising rumors. Both Putin and Zelensky are going to lose people from their inner circle before long. The Russians have as good as said they would kill someone like Oleksandr Syrsky if the lines of communication to Crimea are attacked with Storm Shadow with has now happened.

    But unfortunately making a dent in the rested and refitted dug in Russian army behemoth on the battlefield is now beyond Ukraine. The relative gain in fighting power in the field has been all Russia’s. Ukraine ought to have taken advice from the West and struck when the iron was hot back in December when while they lacked equipment there were no Russian fortifications to overcome, and Bakhnut had not restored Russian faith in their arms. Back then Ukraine had all the psychological momentum and the Russians were disorganised, whereas currently Russian command, control and confidence has been restored. Their dug outs are better camouflaged and deeper than the Ukrainian ones.

    You have got to follow up a success with determination in a timely fashion; failing to do that is as bad as needlessly retreating.

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @Sean

    I’d crucify Prigozhin now and drop his body over the SBU HQ in Kiev. Or fling his carcass over the wall of the US embassy in Moscow…if I were Surovikin.

    Replies: @AP

    , @AP
    @Sean


    But unfortunately making a dent in the rested and refitted dug in Russian army behemoth on the battlefield is now beyond Ukraine
     
    But that is exactly what they have been doing. Making minor territorial gains, while grinding down the Russian defenders and destroying logistics and command centers and keeping the bulk of the newly trained and equipped forces on standby in case there is opportunity for breakthrough.

    Too soon to say whether the Ukrainians will win or lose. How the Prigozhin affair plays can will make a big difference.

    Without considering the Prigozhin attempted putsch, we won't know whether Ukraine wins, loses or is in stalemate until the bulk of its forces actually enter the fray. If they do and are destroyed without gaining significant ground, a Ukrainian loss. If they enter (maybe in a week, maybe in 3 months) after more of the current approach grinds down the Russian forces so that the Ukrainians break through and drive to Crimea, a Ukrainian win. If they are never even used because it's determined that the Russian defenses are sufficiently intact that the attack would be pointless, a stalemate.

    Of course, depending on how things play out in Russia, everything in the previous paragraph could be irrelevant.

    Replies: @John Johnson

  97. @Mr. XYZ
    @QCIC

    I'm quite content with the US returning to the ABM Treaty as a way of reducing tensions with Russia. This treaty won't hurt our ability to effectively respond to China, will it?

    Replies: @QCIC

    That treaty is gone forever.

    We will be lucky if something new can be created. It would have been much easier to apply unified pressure on China and Israel to make them join the existing treaty.

    • Replies: @A123
    @QCIC


    the West needs to make serious one-sided concessions to revive the arms control negotiation process.
     
    The framework you propose does not hold together:

    • Define "The West"?
    • Is the "The West" "one-side"? Clearly not. The U.S. has many difference with Europe. And, Europe is rife with internal divisions.
    • How can "not one-side" offer "one-sided" concessions?

    We do hear & understand what you are trying to say. However, it seems to be grounded in bilateral assumptions that do not hold.
    ____

    Despite the resistance of the NeoConDemocrat old guard, Americans correctly perceive the CCP as the #1 global, strategic threat.

     
    https://globalaffairs.org/sites/default/files/2020-10/Research/200518-pew-china-us-threats.png
     

    The WUHAN-19 leak from the CCP's bioweapons labs at WIV has altered national priorities for the long term.

    We will be lucky if something new can be created. It would have been much easier to apply unified pressure on China and Israel to make them join the existing treaty.
     
    China was not interested 20+ years ago. The CCP liked the bilateral U.S.-Russia trap that restrained their American opposition. Breaking out of bilateral deals was the minimum first step towards multilateral treaties.

    It is unfortunate that a series of new arrangements did not happen. However, the U.S. would be in much worse shape versus the CCP if it had retained the bilateral framework of a bygone era. That would have been an open license for China to run amok.

    Israel's geopolitical strategic situation is so unique, it is hard to see what could be gained by attempting to force their inclusion. Compelling Israel to participate in talks between gigantic nations would be a clever way to scuttle negotiations, thus guaranteeing no results.

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @QCIC

  98. @AP
    @Keypusher

    Probably not, but it has been late at night out there so one would not expect sightings and filmings yet. There are videos of supposes shooting in Rostov.

    This may be a column:



    https://twitter.com/Global_Mil_Info/status/1672414603081383937?s=20

    https://twitter.com/AricToler/status/1672416185638436864?s=20

    Replies: @Sean

  99. Wow, those Wagner columns turned out to be real after all!

  100. @Sean
    @AP

    Prigozhin is no geopolitical strategist, so his ideas about what impelled Russia to take on the West's Ukrainian sockpuppet are unlikely to be of much value. Psychological warfare only achieves concrete results in conjunction with battlefield advances. A coruscating use of both together was in the Kharkov offensive. Ukraine is good and getting better at starting destabilising rumors. Both Putin and Zelensky are going to lose people from their inner circle before long. The Russians have as good as said they would kill someone like Oleksandr Syrsky if the lines of communication to Crimea are attacked with Storm Shadow with has now happened.

    But unfortunately making a dent in the rested and refitted dug in Russian army behemoth on the battlefield is now beyond Ukraine. The relative gain in fighting power in the field has been all Russia's. Ukraine ought to have taken advice from the West and struck when the iron was hot back in December when while they lacked equipment there were no Russian fortifications to overcome, and Bakhnut had not restored Russian faith in their arms. Back then Ukraine had all the psychological momentum and the Russians were disorganised, whereas currently Russian command, control and confidence has been restored. Their dug outs are better camouflaged and deeper than the Ukrainian ones. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t_f2byc3TUg You have got to follow up a success with determination in a timely fashion; failing to do that is as bad as needlessly retreating.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @AP

    I’d crucify Prigozhin now and drop his body over the SBU HQ in Kiev. Or fling his carcass over the wall of the US embassy in Moscow…if I were Surovikin.

    • Replies: @AP
    @Wokechoke

    Prigozhin now owns the Southern Russian military district. He says "“We lost huge amount of territories in Ukraine. The Russian losses in Ukraine are 3-4 times higher than reported by the Russian High Command. Up to 1000 casualties a day (KIA + WIA).”":

    https://twitter.com/RALee85/status/1672463016586014720?s=20

    https://twitter.com/Tendar/status/1672468948141391874?s=20

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

  101. Prigozhin’s recent actions tend to vindicate the Stalinist purges and the Grozny era Oprichnina.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @Wokechoke

    And Saddam's purges, no? And for that matter, Hitler's post-July 20th Plot purges as well, right?

  102. AP says:
    @Sean
    @AP

    Prigozhin is no geopolitical strategist, so his ideas about what impelled Russia to take on the West's Ukrainian sockpuppet are unlikely to be of much value. Psychological warfare only achieves concrete results in conjunction with battlefield advances. A coruscating use of both together was in the Kharkov offensive. Ukraine is good and getting better at starting destabilising rumors. Both Putin and Zelensky are going to lose people from their inner circle before long. The Russians have as good as said they would kill someone like Oleksandr Syrsky if the lines of communication to Crimea are attacked with Storm Shadow with has now happened.

    But unfortunately making a dent in the rested and refitted dug in Russian army behemoth on the battlefield is now beyond Ukraine. The relative gain in fighting power in the field has been all Russia's. Ukraine ought to have taken advice from the West and struck when the iron was hot back in December when while they lacked equipment there were no Russian fortifications to overcome, and Bakhnut had not restored Russian faith in their arms. Back then Ukraine had all the psychological momentum and the Russians were disorganised, whereas currently Russian command, control and confidence has been restored. Their dug outs are better camouflaged and deeper than the Ukrainian ones. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t_f2byc3TUg You have got to follow up a success with determination in a timely fashion; failing to do that is as bad as needlessly retreating.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @AP

    But unfortunately making a dent in the rested and refitted dug in Russian army behemoth on the battlefield is now beyond Ukraine

    But that is exactly what they have been doing. Making minor territorial gains, while grinding down the Russian defenders and destroying logistics and command centers and keeping the bulk of the newly trained and equipped forces on standby in case there is opportunity for breakthrough.

    Too soon to say whether the Ukrainians will win or lose. How the Prigozhin affair plays can will make a big difference.

    Without considering the Prigozhin attempted putsch, we won’t know whether Ukraine wins, loses or is in stalemate until the bulk of its forces actually enter the fray. If they do and are destroyed without gaining significant ground, a Ukrainian loss. If they enter (maybe in a week, maybe in 3 months) after more of the current approach grinds down the Russian forces so that the Ukrainians break through and drive to Crimea, a Ukrainian win. If they are never even used because it’s determined that the Russian defenses are sufficiently intact that the attack would be pointless, a stalemate.

    Of course, depending on how things play out in Russia, everything in the previous paragraph could be irrelevant.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
    @AP

    Too soon to say whether the Ukrainians will win or lose. How the Prigozhin affair plays can will make a big difference.

    Absolutely and especially when it comes to public opinion.

    Russian State TV has convinced the public that Bakhmut was an elaborate trap and Putin knows what he is doing. Russians are a serf like people that put their faith in the Tsar. They view it as not their place to question him.

    Well now his private warlord is threatening mutiny and Ukraine is advancing. Armored vehicles are patrolling Moscow out of fear that the Hebrew chef might come home.

    It public opinion breaks it will be a huge disaster for Russia. The gears of resistance will turn and Putin will be fighting a war of two fronts. One in Ukraine and one at home.

    Nazi Germany was difficult to defeat in part because they had the public convinced that Hitler was a genius who would always win in the end. Even as the Soviets entered Germany it was a common belief that the dictator must still have a grand plan for victory.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @Sean

  103. @Wokechoke
    @Sean

    I’d crucify Prigozhin now and drop his body over the SBU HQ in Kiev. Or fling his carcass over the wall of the US embassy in Moscow…if I were Surovikin.

    Replies: @AP

    Prigozhin now owns the Southern Russian military district. He says ““We lost huge amount of territories in Ukraine. The Russian losses in Ukraine are 3-4 times higher than reported by the Russian High Command. Up to 1000 casualties a day (KIA + WIA).””:

    [MORE]

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @AP

    The Kornilov coup attempt in Russia presaged the Bolshevik rise to power in Russia. What will the Prigozhin coup attempt in Russia presage? The rise to power of Russian neo-fascists such as these?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_Volunteer_Corps

    Ironic if such neo-fascists will be better for Russia than the current Putin regime is, though I cannot rule out this possibility, especially if they will actually succeed in creating a viable pro-natalist culture in Russia:

    https://emilkirkegaard.dk/en/2022/01/authoritarianism-and-fertility-maybe-probably/

    This is one way in which Russia should indeed be more like Israel!

  104. Makes one wonder if the Prigozhin coup attempt in 2023 will be this century’s Russian equivalent of what the Kornilov coup attempt was for Russia back in 1917.

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @Mr. XYZ

    See my reply to suddent death above. As I expected, it is Time of Troubles in Russia again. Now, if Russia becomes the North Eurasian Somalia with whatever is really left of Soviet nuclear weapons stockpile, is that better for any of its neighbors? If RusFed is not there anymore to absorb the excess population of the Central Asian Stans, where will they go ? Will it be as in an old Soviet joke: "Polish radio happily reported that everything is peaceful on the China's border with Finland" ? All this situation should have been avoided...

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

  105. @AP
    @Wokechoke

    Prigozhin now owns the Southern Russian military district. He says "“We lost huge amount of territories in Ukraine. The Russian losses in Ukraine are 3-4 times higher than reported by the Russian High Command. Up to 1000 casualties a day (KIA + WIA).”":

    https://twitter.com/RALee85/status/1672463016586014720?s=20

    https://twitter.com/Tendar/status/1672468948141391874?s=20

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    The Kornilov coup attempt in Russia presaged the Bolshevik rise to power in Russia. What will the Prigozhin coup attempt in Russia presage? The rise to power of Russian neo-fascists such as these?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_Volunteer_Corps

    Ironic if such neo-fascists will be better for Russia than the current Putin regime is, though I cannot rule out this possibility, especially if they will actually succeed in creating a viable pro-natalist culture in Russia:

    https://emilkirkegaard.dk/en/2022/01/authoritarianism-and-fertility-maybe-probably/

    This is one way in which Russia should indeed be more like Israel!

  106. @Wokechoke
    Prigozhin’s recent actions tend to vindicate the Stalinist purges and the Grozny era Oprichnina.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    And Saddam’s purges, no? And for that matter, Hitler’s post-July 20th Plot purges as well, right?

  107. @Matra
    @LondonBob

    Luttwack is a neo-conman

    He's a Zionist, and, yes, he can be shifty, but he's not a neocon, or any other kind of Trotskyite. I remember him opposing the first Iraq war back in 1990.

    Replies: @LondonBob

    I hadn’t heard of him before a few months ago.

  108. @John Johnson
    @LondonBob

    Anyway it is acknowledged they didn’t think Russia would move as there were very few troops on the border, indeed Russia, until partial mobilisation, had used very few troops in the Ukraine, very much outnumbered by the Ukrainians until recently.

    The US and Britain told him an invasion was absolutely coming and to get ready. It was Zelensky that thought Putin would make demands first. I can go back and dig up public warnings from the CIA and MI6. They knew about the invasion months before it happened. It was leaked to them by someone in the Kremlin.

    Still it remains, no one in their right mind thinks you could take a city of three million with forty thousand soldiers, but it turns out it was sufficient to invade, disrupt supply lines and create confusion.

    40k is enough to take a city of three million citizens. That 3 million includes women, children, infants, elderly, etc. Of course it was all the more difficult given that the government handed out AK-47s to anyone that wanted one. If they had a 2A culture it would have been even harder for the Russians but Ukraine has somewhat bought into Western anti-gun bullshit.

    Russian failed to take Ukraine because of their own mistakes.

    The mistakes the Russians made are well documented. A key mistake was trying to take a major airport. Ukraine correctly guessed which airport and had artillery in preparation. Once the airfield was filled with men and vehicles the Ukrainians let the big guns rip. TIME TO DIE FOR DICTATOR

    Another major mistake was sending a 40 mile column of armor and supply trucks through a slow moving road surrounded by trees. Completely stupid given that the Ukrainians had over 20k anti-armor missiles. We still don't know how many Javalins and NLAWs they purchased. At leastk 20k and an endless supply of RPGs from the Soviet days. They'd take out a vehicle and the whole line would stop. Then Ukrainians would raid them at night. The dwarf really bungled it on that plan.

    Replies: @LondonBob

    The intelligence agencies, not the Pentagon though, were talking up an invasion so when it didn’t happen they could portray the illegitimate Biden as strong. Military sources were all saying too few troops.

    The Russians took the land bridge to Crimea, the greatest prize of all.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
    @LondonBob

    The intelligence agencies, not the Pentagon though, were talking up an invasion so when it didn’t happen they could portray the illegitimate Biden as strong.

    They were talking up an invasion because they knew it would happen.

    Zelensky was warned by both the CIA and MI6 and he ignored their advice to put the military on alert. It has nothing to do with Biden. Zelensky would have been given the same warning if Trump was president.

    That in fact undermines the theory that Zelensky is a puppet of the West. They wanted him to prepare for an attack from Belarus and he didn't respond out of fear of provoking Putin. He in fact made a public plea to Putin for diplomatic talks which was ignored. I can find that video if you would like.

    His refusal to believe CIA/MI6 was in fact a huge mistake. They could have mined the northern entrance and placed artillery in range of the roads. The northern entrance has natural defenses outside the main road in the form of swamps. Putin in fact counted on Zelensky to sit there in shock as Russian troops poured across the border. That border is now secure and a second attempt would be a disaster.

    Military sources were all saying too few troops.

    False. Military analysts in the West expected Kiev to collapse and NATO aid only started flowing after Ukraine pushed the Russians out of the city.

  109. @QCIC
    @Mr. Hack

    This is about the West pressuring Russia in a way that can easily lead to nuclear war. The leaders in the West are willing to risk it because they think they are wise or immortal or some other stupid reason. Why do you support this insanity?

    The West completed many provocations against Russia before Maidan, so the bigger picture has little to do with Ukraine.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

    This is about the West pressuring Russia in a way that can easily lead to nuclear war.

    So now its Prigozhin that’s taking his marching orders from the West? Or is it Shoigu or Gerasimov?
    It’s always the fault of the West and never Russia’s for all of the insanity going on within Russia.

    Why not just name the culprit like Ivashka has?Is Klaus Schwab at it again and making the RusFed leadership look stupid once again?

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @Mr. Hack

    Intelligent people work calmly and methodically on reaching their objectives. Naive people think that history is made of happenstance. This situation in RusFed was at least two generations in making. I am pretty certain that Gvishiani is smiling in Hell.

    , @QCIC
    @Mr. Hack

    In my own tiny way I try to influence this discussion to deescalate the West to reduce the risk of nuclear war. I do this by explaining the situation from a Cold War 2.0 perspective which emphasizes real issues which are lost in the dumbed-down perspective of a manipulated blood feud between brothers. I think my outlook is valid but obviously incomplete. The big picture of the whole thing could actually be a feud between Klaus Schwab and Semion Mogilevich over some woman whose name I can't spell much less pronounce.

    I regularly point out that the situation is driven by hidden forces in various countries. This is obvious from various things which are not explained. The dog that didn't bark.

    The friendly Ukrainian combination of Jewish power and NeoNAZIs has always made this look like a farce. Once we have that, anything goes, since it is one of the weirdest things publicly accepted in 2023.

  110. Looks like Prigozhin is also trying to take Voronezh next after Rostov, pro-Wagner source is reporting now:

    In the Voronezh region, one of the columns of the PMC “Wagner” was attacked. Aviation works the same way, bombs are being used. The civil war has officially begun.

    https://t.me/apwagner/9135

    • Replies: @sudden death
    @sudden death

    Strelkov:


    The rebels successfully passed Voronezh and are moving through the territory of the Lipetsk region. They boast that they shot down the forward outposts of the "Rosguard" and took trophies.
     
    https://t.me/strelkovii/5680

    If this is true, it's not RF army inside RF fighting against Prigozhin, but inner police on steroids - Rosgvardiya, led by Zolotov, probably army simply doesn't not have enough forces inside as everybody is at the front?

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

  111. @Mikel
    @LondonBob

    Well, as I said above, 2 days ago Putin left his most servile supporters in the West with egg on their faces (once again) by declaring that he stopped the assault on Kiev as a gesture of good will amid the Istanbul negotiations and actually showed some papers to the press purportedly proving this.

    Of course, those of you defending his 3D chess skills with the Kiev feint will not hesitate to double down and proclaim his 4D skills claiming now that it was a feint to carry out a subsequent feint of a good will gesture but don't you realize how ridiculous you look?

    In any case, Putin has better things to worry about than his hapless Western supporters. According to the latest news, Prigozhin seems to be already on the move.

    Replies: @Yevardian, @LondonBob

    The assault on a city of three million, with forty thousand?

    The Russians withdrew with minimal fuss, nothing messy about it, they had the upper hand. Hardly an act of genius to decide to portray something you were going to do anyway as an act of goodwill instead? Whether the deal was signed or not, they weren’t staying there.

  112. @sudden death
    Looks like Prigozhin is also trying to take Voronezh next after Rostov, pro-Wagner source is reporting now:

    In the Voronezh region, one of the columns of the PMC "Wagner" was attacked. Aviation works the same way, bombs are being used. The civil war has officially begun.
     
    https://t.me/apwagner/9135

    Replies: @sudden death

    Strelkov:

    The rebels successfully passed Voronezh and are moving through the territory of the Lipetsk region. They boast that they shot down the forward outposts of the “Rosguard” and took trophies.

    https://t.me/strelkovii/5680

    If this is true, it’s not RF army inside RF fighting against Prigozhin, but inner police on steroids – Rosgvardiya, led by Zolotov, probably army simply doesn’t not have enough forces inside as everybody is at the front?

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @sudden death

    It's funny how I was the only one here who wrote that the only question about RusFed currently was whether we were still in 1916 or already in 1917. Also when I wrote that 2024 in RusFed will be very interesting to watch from afar. And of course when I wrote years ago that Putin will not end his his presidential term in 2024.
    I am sure that you found my predictions rather funny and unhinged, but here you have it.

    Replies: @AP

  113. @sudden death
    @sudden death

    Strelkov:


    The rebels successfully passed Voronezh and are moving through the territory of the Lipetsk region. They boast that they shot down the forward outposts of the "Rosguard" and took trophies.
     
    https://t.me/strelkovii/5680

    If this is true, it's not RF army inside RF fighting against Prigozhin, but inner police on steroids - Rosgvardiya, led by Zolotov, probably army simply doesn't not have enough forces inside as everybody is at the front?

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

    It’s funny how I was the only one here who wrote that the only question about RusFed currently was whether we were still in 1916 or already in 1917. Also when I wrote that 2024 in RusFed will be very interesting to watch from afar. And of course when I wrote years ago that Putin will not end his his presidential term in 2024.
    I am sure that you found my predictions rather funny and unhinged, but here you have it.

    • Replies: @AP
    @Ivashka the fool

    I did not find your predictions to have been crazy. But it looked more like 1905 to me - you were right, 1917. Prigozhin who is an expert on coups in Africa saw his chance in Russia. He admitted that Ukraine was invaded for all the wrong reasons but also claims he will be better at invasion. You think he will try again?

    Lukashenko and family in Turkey. Arestovich, a Belarusian nobleman, would make a fine replacement (one can hope).

    Replies: @AP, @Mikhail

  114. @Mr. Hack
    @QCIC


    This is about the West pressuring Russia in a way that can easily lead to nuclear war.
     
    So now its Prigozhin that's taking his marching orders from the West? Or is it Shoigu or Gerasimov?
    It's always the fault of the West and never Russia's for all of the insanity going on within Russia.

    Why not just name the culprit like Ivashka has?
    https://s3-eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/cartoons-s3/styles/product_detail_image/s3/klausschwab-pugliese.jpg?itok=7QrUBXt8
    Is Klaus Schwab at it again and making the RusFed leadership look stupid once again?

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @QCIC

    Intelligent people work calmly and methodically on reaching their objectives. Naive people think that history is made of happenstance. This situation in RusFed was at least two generations in making. I am pretty certain that Gvishiani is smiling in Hell.

  115. @Mr. XYZ
    Makes one wonder if the Prigozhin coup attempt in 2023 will be this century's Russian equivalent of what the Kornilov coup attempt was for Russia back in 1917.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

    See my reply to suddent death above. As I expected, it is Time of Troubles in Russia again. Now, if Russia becomes the North Eurasian Somalia with whatever is really left of Soviet nuclear weapons stockpile, is that better for any of its neighbors? If RusFed is not there anymore to absorb the excess population of the Central Asian Stans, where will they go ? Will it be as in an old Soviet joke: “Polish radio happily reported that everything is peaceful on the China’s border with Finland” ? All this situation should have been avoided…

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @Ivashka the fool


    If RusFed is not there anymore to absorb the excess population of the Central Asian Stans, where will they go ?
     
    China?
  116. The intelligence agencies, not the Pentagon though, were talking up an invasion so when it didn’t happen they could portray the illegitimate Biden as strong. Military sources were all saying too few troops.

    I realize this is a difficult time for you, but just stop with the retcon bullshit, OK?

  117. @Greasy William
    With Estonia legalizing gay marriage and Poland announcing that it is opening up to mass nonwhite immigration, it is obvious what is in store for Ukraine should they win this war. Doesn't mean the Ukrainians shouldn't fight, but we should be honest about the situation

    Replies: @Yevardian, @Mr. XYZ, @china-russia-all-the-way, @Hartnell

    Maybe it is what the people in these countries want to become? Liberal and woke? Maybe it doesn’t bother them at all about becoming a minority. Maybe it is all about democracy and having a good life they are interested in?

    Of course looking at the West, immigration is ruining the good quality of life but the Slavs, rather then fighting to resist it, seem to be fighting to join it which means maybe they really don’t care.

    • Replies: @Greasy William
    @Hartnell

    Of course they want it. If you give people freedom to choose, they will always choose LGBT and mass immigration. But that does not mean that we should allow LGBT and mass immigration, rather it means that we should reject democracy.

  118. AP says:
    @Ivashka the fool
    @sudden death

    It's funny how I was the only one here who wrote that the only question about RusFed currently was whether we were still in 1916 or already in 1917. Also when I wrote that 2024 in RusFed will be very interesting to watch from afar. And of course when I wrote years ago that Putin will not end his his presidential term in 2024.
    I am sure that you found my predictions rather funny and unhinged, but here you have it.

    Replies: @AP

    I did not find your predictions to have been crazy. But it looked more like 1905 to me – you were right, 1917. Prigozhin who is an expert on coups in Africa saw his chance in Russia. He admitted that Ukraine was invaded for all the wrong reasons but also claims he will be better at invasion. You think he will try again?

    Lukashenko and family in Turkey. Arestovich, a Belarusian nobleman, would make a fine replacement (one can hope).

    • LOL: Mikhail
    • Replies: @AP
    @AP

    But I doubt there will be a 1918-1920. No desperation for a Civil War. Hopefully this ends the invasion of Ukraine, and Ukraine uses the Russian internal problems to better integrate with its Western brothers and maintain a powerful army, two factors that will prevent a future invasion by Russia. Ukraine utterly failed to take advantage of the 1990s in that way, but this time the stakes are very clear to everybody.

    As I said, Ukraine is the Poland of 1919-1920. A smaller state, but a unified state and people lavishly equipped by the West in its fight against the Russian invader.

    PS Kadyrov may still be loyal to Putin. An opportunity to rid Russia of Chechens?

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Mr. XYZ

    , @Mikhail
    @AP


    He admitted that Ukraine was invaded for all the wrong reasons but also claims he will be better at invasion.
     
    A bogus claim on his part that has been factually debunked as evidenced by the Kiev regime, France and Germany acknowledging that the Minsk Accords were a charade designed to buy time. OSCE monitors on the ground noted a sharp increase in Kiev regime firings on rebel held Donbass in the weeks leading up to the start of the SMO.

    Replies: @AP

  119. AP says:
    @AP
    @Ivashka the fool

    I did not find your predictions to have been crazy. But it looked more like 1905 to me - you were right, 1917. Prigozhin who is an expert on coups in Africa saw his chance in Russia. He admitted that Ukraine was invaded for all the wrong reasons but also claims he will be better at invasion. You think he will try again?

    Lukashenko and family in Turkey. Arestovich, a Belarusian nobleman, would make a fine replacement (one can hope).

    Replies: @AP, @Mikhail

    But I doubt there will be a 1918-1920. No desperation for a Civil War. Hopefully this ends the invasion of Ukraine, and Ukraine uses the Russian internal problems to better integrate with its Western brothers and maintain a powerful army, two factors that will prevent a future invasion by Russia. Ukraine utterly failed to take advantage of the 1990s in that way, but this time the stakes are very clear to everybody.

    As I said, Ukraine is the Poland of 1919-1920. A smaller state, but a unified state and people lavishly equipped by the West in its fight against the Russian invader.

    PS Kadyrov may still be loyal to Putin. An opportunity to rid Russia of Chechens?

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @AP


    Пишут, что иранский КСИР готов отправить в Москву свои отряды для оказания помощи российскому правительству.

    История сомнительная, будем говорить откровенно. Без логистики, без языка, без баз любой экспедиционный корпус буквально растворится здесь. В Сирии шиитские Ваффен-СС выстраивали инфраструктуру года полтора, и только потом начали массированный заброс наемников. Тут с колес - ну очень все белыми нитками шито.

    С другой стороны, сейчас Путин может КСИРу вообще подарить все что угодно - вплоть до ядерного оружия, лишь бы спасти шкуру. Последствия в таких случаях интересуют очень слабо.
     

    From the Tg Channel of Anatoly Nesmiyan (Elmurid).

    If Shiah and Sunni Muslims can collaborate in the falling RusFed, if Turan and Iran unite their forces, then the future global Caliphate is rapidly becoming inevitable.

    Just wait and see, we'll probably live long enough to see the Islamisation of most of the FUSSR and therefore Eurasia becoming a nearly certain outcome.

    That would be the outcome of the russophobic policies of the Western puppeteers.

    Erdogan must be delighted with what is going on in RusFed.

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Yevardian

    , @Mr. XYZ
    @AP


    But I doubt there will be a 1918-1920. No desperation for a Civil War. Hopefully this ends the invasion of Ukraine, and Ukraine uses the Russian internal problems to better integrate with its Western brothers and maintain a powerful army, two factors that will prevent a future invasion by Russia. Ukraine utterly failed to take advantage of the 1990s in that way, but this time the stakes are very clear to everybody.
     
    Ukraine should certainly do all of that but it should also seek to combine this with NATO membership as soon as possible so that it becomes a fait accompli. Russia is likely to be pissed off in any case (Russia doesn't like Western military cooperation with Ukraine even outside of NATO even though such military cooperation is necessary for Ukraine's own security), so might as well get NATO membership over with so that Russia would complain a bit but won't be able to subsequently undo it, similar to how Baltic and Finnish NATO memberships are both already faits accompli which Russia can do nothing about.

    1990s Ukraine did a lot of wrong things. The most important wrong thing was not following in Poland's trajectory, both economically and militarily. The second most important wrong thing was frequently voting for Sovoks, and low-quality ones at that. The third most important wrong thing was to give up its nukes or at the very least to make a deal with the West that it will only give up its nukes in exchange for immediate NATO membership. The West itself was unfortunately too short-sighted in regards to this back then as well, though. Though ironically John Mearsheimer got this specific issue correct--specifically the need for Ukraine to keep its nukes as a deterrent against Russia. Though he later began blaming the West and NATO for provoking Russia. NATO derangement syndrome, anyone?
  120. Prigozhin’s Decline

    Excellent overview with an interesting comparison to elements in the French military failing to overthrow de Gaulle in the 1960s and the MacArthur-Truman split. The optics of Prigozhin’s action serve the interests of Russia’s adversaries with the Russian government lax in addressing his insubordination.

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @Mikhail

    What exactly was going on in Bakhmut? Was Prigozhin funnelling in supplies and cash from NATO under the cover of a “battle” for the city?

    Replies: @Mikhail

    , @Sean
    @Mikhail

    There is certainly no comparison with the French WW1 mutinies, or rather strikes, which were due to huge casualties, and disappointment at the Americans troops not shouldering much more of line as had been expected . A possible similarity is they usually started with troops getting drunk (Prigozhin is a drinker). The Germans did not know about it, luckily for France.

    Had Ukraine mounted an attack as soon as the Wagner revolt column drive became publically known , great things might have been achieves. For all their vaunted adaptability they are not agile enough to take advantage of such opportunities. Both sides in this war have become defence orientated and very ponderous. The breaching doctrine of combined arms as all militaries were theoretical experts has had its shortcomings in practice cruelly exposed.

    The Wagner revolt was prolly sparked by the ruling from the Kremlin that all Wagner personnel must sign contracts with the regular army by July. That was going to be a huge hit to their wallets, but they are now going to get more money, which seems fair as they are specialized assault infantry.


    The optics of Prigozhin’s action serve the interests of Russia’s adversaries with the Russian government lax in addressing his insubordination.
     
    The optics of the Bakhmut victory were obscured by PR in the West, but the fact is it was a concrete defeat for Ukraine of real importance for the morale of Ukrainian soldiers.

    Prigozhin's Wagnerites-with-a-soaking-up-enemy firepower-screen-of-expendable convicts set up was ready, willing and able to successfully advance into cities with high buildings: what had been urban death traps for attackers. The regular Russian army even the VDV, was not so great at that. I believe the Zpenal bataions are going to be regular army from now on So Wagner work is done; they have pioneered new methods, which the regular army will now use and also take over all the troops with experienced in them, who will be paid in accordance with their proven skills. None of that is good news for Ukraine, which has not had a victory since November.

    Replies: @Wokechoke

  121. @Mikhail
    Prigozhin's Decline

    Excellent overview with an interesting comparison to elements in the French military failing to overthrow de Gaulle in the 1960s and the MacArthur-Truman split. The optics of Prigozhin's action serve the interests of Russia's adversaries with the Russian government lax in addressing his insubordination.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4l532VKHA2E

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @Sean

    What exactly was going on in Bakhmut? Was Prigozhin funnelling in supplies and cash from NATO under the cover of a “battle” for the city?

    • Replies: @Mikhail
    @Wokechoke

    It has been noted that Prigozhin isn't a professional military guy and is frustrated that Russia doesn't take the offensive. Russia isn't doing so because they know they'll lose more personnel that way even with a win as opposed to letting the NATO backed Kiev regime come at them. As is, Russia is winning the war of attrition which is about taking out more of your enemy's military assets than losing yours.

    In his appeal to Wagner personnel Surovikin made it a point to suggest that some of the stated grievances might've merit while adding that the move/comment by Prigozhin aren't appropriate. Prigo had complained about his forces not getting enough supplies which led to unnecessary casualties among his men. Was that calculated or a matter of bad planning or the supply line facing an obstacle along the way?

    Either way you cut it, he (for now) figuratively shot himself.

  122. @Wokechoke
    @Mikhail

    What exactly was going on in Bakhmut? Was Prigozhin funnelling in supplies and cash from NATO under the cover of a “battle” for the city?

    Replies: @Mikhail

    It has been noted that Prigozhin isn’t a professional military guy and is frustrated that Russia doesn’t take the offensive. Russia isn’t doing so because they know they’ll lose more personnel that way even with a win as opposed to letting the NATO backed Kiev regime come at them. As is, Russia is winning the war of attrition which is about taking out more of your enemy’s military assets than losing yours.

    In his appeal to Wagner personnel Surovikin made it a point to suggest that some of the stated grievances might’ve merit while adding that the move/comment by Prigozhin aren’t appropriate. Prigo had complained about his forces not getting enough supplies which led to unnecessary casualties among his men. Was that calculated or a matter of bad planning or the supply line facing an obstacle along the way?

    Either way you cut it, he (for now) figuratively shot himself.

  123. @AP
    @Ivashka the fool

    I did not find your predictions to have been crazy. But it looked more like 1905 to me - you were right, 1917. Prigozhin who is an expert on coups in Africa saw his chance in Russia. He admitted that Ukraine was invaded for all the wrong reasons but also claims he will be better at invasion. You think he will try again?

    Lukashenko and family in Turkey. Arestovich, a Belarusian nobleman, would make a fine replacement (one can hope).

    Replies: @AP, @Mikhail

    He admitted that Ukraine was invaded for all the wrong reasons but also claims he will be better at invasion.

    A bogus claim on his part that has been factually debunked as evidenced by the Kiev regime, France and Germany acknowledging that the Minsk Accords were a charade designed to buy time. OSCE monitors on the ground noted a sharp increase in Kiev regime firings on rebel held Donbass in the weeks leading up to the start of the SMO.

    • Replies: @AP
    @Mikhail

    You keep on being wrong.

    Looks like Ukrainian intelligence who have been warning of a Russian civil war for awhile, knew what they were talking about. Good for Budanov :-)

    Replies: @Mikhail, @Wokechoke

  124. @Mikhail
    @AP


    He admitted that Ukraine was invaded for all the wrong reasons but also claims he will be better at invasion.
     
    A bogus claim on his part that has been factually debunked as evidenced by the Kiev regime, France and Germany acknowledging that the Minsk Accords were a charade designed to buy time. OSCE monitors on the ground noted a sharp increase in Kiev regime firings on rebel held Donbass in the weeks leading up to the start of the SMO.

    Replies: @AP

    You keep on being wrong.

    Looks like Ukrainian intelligence who have been warning of a Russian civil war for awhile, knew what they were talking about. Good for Budanov 🙂

    • LOL: Mikhail
    • Replies: @Mikhail
    @AP

    I'm also reminded of the attempt to militarily overthrow Erdogan a few years ago. That action had greater potential. Keep up the wishful thinking to maintain good spirits as opposed to dealing with the sobering reality of what the Kiev regime faces.

    , @Wokechoke
    @AP

    Those personalities seem to be concentrated in the entourage of Prigozhid now. All banished.

  125. @QCIC
    @John Johnson

    The war is about Western aggressive moves to corner Russia and make it a vassal of the West or a failed state.

    This is what the Russians are fighting in Ukraine. This is why Ukraine is a pawn in a proxy war.

    The Western approach is true hybrid warfare on all fronts. It is the most dangerous game in history.

    Fifth columns and NGOs in Russia--check.

    Unprecedented wide and deep economic warfare against Russia--check.

    Warm-up coups near Russia (Georgia, Kazakhstan attempt, Belarus attempt)--check.

    Coup in Ukraine

    NATO weapons in Ukraine--check.

    World-wide information war against Russia--check.

    Miscellaneous direct nuclear threats against Russia--check.

    Anti-Russian civil war in Ukraine--check.

    At some point Russia may get tired of this nonsense. I doubt their response will be what the Neocons hope for. Do you really trust Blinken, Austin, Sullivan and Milley to get ANYTHING right?

    Replies: @John Johnson

    The war is about Western aggressive moves to corner Russia and make it a vassal of the West or a failed state.

    Yet another excuse. The only consistency among Putin supporters is that they can’t maintain a consistent explanation for the war.

    You told me in this very thread that it is about the ABM and now it is about countering Western plans to make Russia a vassal state.

    You can’t even maintain a consistent explanation over a 24 hour period.

    In the 1420 videos it is clear that Russians themselves can’t explain why the war exists.

    Putin himself has given at least four different explanations.

    Coup in Ukraine

    Do explain how there was a coup when the removed pro-Russian president was disavowed by his own party as a corrupt criminal.

    • Replies: @QCIC
    @John Johnson

    My explanation of Russia's requirements from the SMO has been roughly the same for a long time. I do think Putin is more of a moderate than I previously realized. I use different words to describe the situation to better explain my position. If you are confused, try a thesaurus.

    If it looks like a coup, walks like a coup and talks like a coup that's what I call it.

    My biggest questions have always been what happens in Ukraine West of the river and also how does Russia reintegrate the city of Kiev.

    I have also always said there is some chance the whole thing is fake/preordained. This latest Prigozhin gimmick might be in that category.

    I don't know what is going on in Russia. Here are some possibilities.

    Maybe Putin is ready to retire and he is cleaning house (Shoigu) on the way out?

    Maybe the powers that be need a really big distraction? The fake submersible wasn't enough for this month.

    Maybe Prigozhin vigorously stirring the pot gives the West an out from Ukraine? [I hope]

    Maybe Zhenya is ready to retire?

    Maybe you can retire!

  126. @LondonBob
    @John Johnson

    The intelligence agencies, not the Pentagon though, were talking up an invasion so when it didn't happen they could portray the illegitimate Biden as strong. Military sources were all saying too few troops.

    The Russians took the land bridge to Crimea, the greatest prize of all.

    Replies: @John Johnson

    The intelligence agencies, not the Pentagon though, were talking up an invasion so when it didn’t happen they could portray the illegitimate Biden as strong.

    They were talking up an invasion because they knew it would happen.

    Zelensky was warned by both the CIA and MI6 and he ignored their advice to put the military on alert. It has nothing to do with Biden. Zelensky would have been given the same warning if Trump was president.

    That in fact undermines the theory that Zelensky is a puppet of the West. They wanted him to prepare for an attack from Belarus and he didn’t respond out of fear of provoking Putin. He in fact made a public plea to Putin for diplomatic talks which was ignored. I can find that video if you would like.

    His refusal to believe CIA/MI6 was in fact a huge mistake. They could have mined the northern entrance and placed artillery in range of the roads. The northern entrance has natural defenses outside the main road in the form of swamps. Putin in fact counted on Zelensky to sit there in shock as Russian troops poured across the border. That border is now secure and a second attempt would be a disaster.

    Military sources were all saying too few troops.

    False. Military analysts in the West expected Kiev to collapse and NATO aid only started flowing after Ukraine pushed the Russians out of the city.

  127. @Beckow
    @QCIC

    This JJ guy is not capable of responding to factual points. Look how he runs away every time we ask him a specific question. "Moldova" for god's sake? Even better, "a leaked plan to invade Moldova" means to JJ that Putin is Peter The Great, or something stupid like that. He has no answers, so he escapes into absurdity - it is something Anglos do a lot and think that nobody sees through it. But it is very transparent - they run away from a normal discussion when someone asks about ABM, Kosovo, Iraq, Nato in Ukraine, Kiev's bombing of Donbas, banning Russian after Maidan, etc...it is infantile.

    JJ will not address how extremely destabilizing was US decision to drop out of the ABM Treaty. Until he does, it is best to just ignore him. He has told us about this incredible "winning" offensive by Kiev that looks like a dud. Now he tells us about Prigozhin or whomever changing topics to run away. Tomorrow he will drop Prigozhin and tell us about other cacamonie 'news', or 'predictions'. It is a technique - scream and shout to hide one's intentions and what is going on......like good British clowns they are...:)

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @Boethiuss, @AP, @John Johnson

    Now he tells us about Prigozhin or whomever changing topics to run away. Tomorrow he will drop Prigozhin and tell us about…….

    Changing topics? Oh my fuccing word!!

    Obviously any responsible commenter of the situation has to address random bullshit grievance theories like ABM (or Russian language regulation in Donbas, or whatever).

    Wagner PMC in open battle against the Russian MoD, in control of Rostov and Voroneh and advancing on Moscow, that’s obviously a distraction.

    • LOL: John Johnson
    • Replies: @Beckow
    @Boethiuss

    You are - as always - getting too excited with anticipation. It looks like the usual internal dispute in a country at war between the moderates and the radicals, or possibly some foreign-sponsored forces. What are you going to do if it fizzles out or fails?

    The giddy excitement that the likes of JJ, AP, Mr. Hacks or you go through at any sign of "good news" betrays your insecurity. Get something done first, your breathless, boastful "Kremlin is about to fall!", "we are taking Crimea!" talk makes you look slightly ridiculous. The main effect so far is that the 80-90% of people in Russia who are on the moderate, but by now firmly anti-Western side, are being consolidated. Given the the West needs either the liberals or the radicals take over in Russia, this is not good news for them. They can't handle sober self-serving Russia, they would like anything else instead. I strongly doubt they will get it. But it is entertaining...

    This has a feeling of our not-so-distant future being very different than anyone has predicted, a turn in human development. I have said before that the Maidan-2022 war, Trump, C19, Brexit will all be in an introductory chapter called Causes. Of course, we have to make it through and there is someone left to write it...:). But I would not celebrate if I were you - the crisis is accelerating and that is not good for anyone.

    Replies: @AP, @John Johnson

  128. @AP
    @Sean


    But unfortunately making a dent in the rested and refitted dug in Russian army behemoth on the battlefield is now beyond Ukraine
     
    But that is exactly what they have been doing. Making minor territorial gains, while grinding down the Russian defenders and destroying logistics and command centers and keeping the bulk of the newly trained and equipped forces on standby in case there is opportunity for breakthrough.

    Too soon to say whether the Ukrainians will win or lose. How the Prigozhin affair plays can will make a big difference.

    Without considering the Prigozhin attempted putsch, we won't know whether Ukraine wins, loses or is in stalemate until the bulk of its forces actually enter the fray. If they do and are destroyed without gaining significant ground, a Ukrainian loss. If they enter (maybe in a week, maybe in 3 months) after more of the current approach grinds down the Russian forces so that the Ukrainians break through and drive to Crimea, a Ukrainian win. If they are never even used because it's determined that the Russian defenses are sufficiently intact that the attack would be pointless, a stalemate.

    Of course, depending on how things play out in Russia, everything in the previous paragraph could be irrelevant.

    Replies: @John Johnson

    Too soon to say whether the Ukrainians will win or lose. How the Prigozhin affair plays can will make a big difference.

    Absolutely and especially when it comes to public opinion.

    Russian State TV has convinced the public that Bakhmut was an elaborate trap and Putin knows what he is doing. Russians are a serf like people that put their faith in the Tsar. They view it as not their place to question him.

    Well now his private warlord is threatening mutiny and Ukraine is advancing. Armored vehicles are patrolling Moscow out of fear that the Hebrew chef might come home.

    It public opinion breaks it will be a huge disaster for Russia. The gears of resistance will turn and Putin will be fighting a war of two fronts. One in Ukraine and one at home.

    Nazi Germany was difficult to defeat in part because they had the public convinced that Hitler was a genius who would always win in the end. Even as the Soviets entered Germany it was a common belief that the dictator must still have a grand plan for victory.

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @John Johnson

    At this point the jew will have to be shot.

    , @Sean
    @John Johnson

    Just as Chamberlain's government --loath to rerun WW1-- nevertheless gave a full territorial guarantee to Poland the instant the Nazi Soviet pact became known, Ukraine's coalescing military understanding with and orientation to the West is now regarded by the Kremlin as making war necessary at whatever cost. That sudden assignment was the sort of thing Russia's army might reasonably be expected to be ready for. However, the peacetime Russian army is kept procedurally hidebound because in peace the army' combat effectiveness and morale being very low does not matter. For the Kremlin, the army's status in Russian society being low is deliberate policy (fantastic as it seems Russian gangsters extort money from soldiers, including officers and even members of the nuclear forces) and this is because it has he priority of making sure the military top brass can never be a political force in their own right. Command has a way of going to a mans head and recent events involving Prigozhin show that the Kremlin's worries about not keeping a very bureaucratic chain of command were not so paranoid.

    The quick practical methods of command based on personal loyalty to leaders that are inherent to success in actual combat confer a danger for the Kremlin inasmuch as the army leadership might have the potential for a power play. Wagner was already combat experienced and agile, so it was used in Bakhmut with new Z-convict expendables, and with regulary army fire support and shell supply achieved victory. There seems to have been an understanding between Putin and Prigozhin that he could draw attention to Wagner and contrast its achievements with the regular army; this would have given the Kremlin a useful way to goad the regular army to greater efforts. With the balance of his mind disturbed, Prigozhin wrongly thought he had carte blanch for any action against the army brass hats, no matter how egregious.

    Prigozhin completely lacks an independent power base, so nothing could come of him using the relatively tiny Wagner to stage a genuine revolt against the huge Russian army , still less the Kremlin that ultimately controls the army, but his own death along with any who followed him' He made his money in casinos (a licence to print money) and is smart but not terribly level headed in view of his failure at youthful petty criminality , and he did spend time at the sharp end in Bakhmut, maybe too much because certain of his appearances--as with the ones that showed him raging at the army behind a pile of his own men's corpses--may indicate a touch of traumatic stress disorder. May he be have been resorting to drugs to unwind? The idea that Sergei Shoigu is a mastermind who pulled the strings of Putin and got into a war with Ukraine so Shoigu could be promoted, as alleged by Prigozhin, is risible; is accusations are a symptom of him losing his mind. He is about to find himself back in prison. Wagner is not longer required because the regulars have their own Zpenal battalions now. Wagner personnel had to sign contrast with the regular army by July, he thought his position of independent control was disappearing so he started echoing Western commentators about the origin and course of the conflict; he said the Ukraine were about to take a strategic town they are nowhere near and not even advancing towards.

    At the end of the day ordinary Russians entering the army are convinced that they are fighting Nato, and this is a battle for the survival of the thousand year existence of the Russian state, seen as the only thing safeguarding the existence of the Russian people. Ukraine's cross border raid into Russia proper may have been intended to distract from the loss of Bakhmut, but made it look like Ukraine was Nazi: hunting ordinary Russians just for being Russia. This was a gift to Putin. Prigozhin's escapade may be a PR triumph for Ukraine in the West and damage his standing among Chinese, Indian and Iranian elites but in Russia it will play to increasing Putin's authority. Something very unpleasant will happen to Zelensky the instant Putin is assassinated. There are standing instructions in the Kremlin to that effect--rely on it.

    Only the Russian army counts now and Putin has given them what they want at the cost of increasing their status to Great Patriotic War rather than SMO levels. It is like WW2 where Soviet generals tortured into confessing and convicted of spying were released from the Gulag and reinstated at their previous rank to do their jobs. A few years later the Austrian whose name is better left unmentioned was telling his staff the have faith and remember the deliverance of Fredrick's Prussia. To which they later scoffed "Which Tsarina is going to die this time?" Zelensky is going to be increasingly be predicting another but successful coup as deus ex machina for an inexorably deteriorating military situation against the behemoth Russia army becomes ever clearer, and the limit on how far America will go stops at direct involvement--the only thing that can ultimately defeat or hold back the Russian army.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DNbad82plR0

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

  129. @Sean
    @John Johnson

    Great psychological warfare to distract from the fact that Ukraine has not had a victory since November and with a fresh force of superbly equipped and trained ten brigades to play with has nowhere got through or even to the first line of Russian defences on the ground north of Crimea that has been the major Russian gain of the SMO still held to date. Apart from making things up to distract from the PR disaster of the counter offensive fiasco, Kiev decided to launch on of their Storm Shadow missiles, actually the lighter payload French one (maybe more difficult to shoot down) on a key Crimean road link bridge.

    Great thinking if they are goal is to be in their graves, because Russia has threatened that the leadership in Kiev (“decision making centres) would be targeted if the Western long range missiles were used for strikes on those lines of communication to Crimea. I think Ukraine leadership, military equipment and army will be slowly but surely written down that order. Rely on it, a precision assassination of someone in Zelensky's circle is coming in retaliation.

    Replies: @John Johnson, @Wokechoke

    Great psychological warfare to distract from the fact that Ukraine has not had a victory since November and with a fresh force of superbly equipped and trained ten brigades to play with has nowhere got through or even to the first line of Russian defences on the ground north of Crimea that has been the major Russian gain of the SMO still held to date.

    The Nazis took Ukraine in a month and Russia never fully took Bakhmut over nearly a year. A former city of 70k that is now in ruin. When this war started we were told that Russia would crush Ukraine within weeks.

    But I agree that the Prigozhin situation is excellent psychological warfare. It will absolutely undermine the Russian State TV narrative of Putin being in control of the situation. Thank you very much Prigozhin for donating your services to Ukraine. You are humiliating Putin and Russia. Well done.

    As for the offensive it is too early to judge. Offensives of this scale in modern warfare normally take months. We haven’t seen the bulk of the armored attacks and the Kremlin is lying about destroying 60 leopards. They would constantly show images of them on State TV if that were true.

    Russia has heavily mined defensives and anyone expecting some quick march on Melitopol like the movies really doesn’t understand how modern warfare works. There however is still very much the potential for a Russian rout so it is really just something to watch at this point.

    Kiev decided to launch on of their Storm Shadow missiles, actually the lighter payload French one (maybe more difficult to shoot down) on a key Crimean road link bridge

    It definitely needs to be hit again.

    I think Ukraine leadership, military equipment and army will be slowly but surely written down that order. Rely on it, a precision assassination of someone in Zelensky’s circle is coming in retaliation.

    Ritter and MacGregor have told us that Ukraine is weeks away from capitulation for over a year. Larry C Johnson and Moon of Alabama told us that Prigozhin was just an elaborate play by Putin.

    This war is simply not going well for Russia. I don’t see why it is so difficult for Putin’s defenders to make this simple admission. They seem to have a weird alpha male attachment to him like Africans and their Big Man leaders. It’s really creepy. I openly support Ukraine but that doesn’t mean I have some weird attachment to Zelensky. I think he has done a fine job but I’ve also been critical of him in numerous areas. He made a huge mistake early in the war by not putting the military on defense in the north.

    • Replies: @A123
    @John Johnson


    This war is simply not going well for Russia. I don’t see why it is so difficult for Putin’s defenders to make this simple admission.
     
    Just about everyone has admitted that RF forces underperformed expectations. Especially in the initial weeks. The logistics problems were epic and took months to sort out.

    However, Zelensky's defenders need to make an equally damning admission.

    Without ~€8 Billion/Month of external support flowing to the Kiev regime, underperforming Russian Forces would be able to grind out a predictable victory in Ukraine.

    Ukie Maximalism resembles the Muslim Occupation of Gaza, Judea, & Samaria -- Heavily propped up by outside interests. Zelensky is in constant international diplomacy, desperately attempting to raise funds to continue the fight. And, the stated goals (e.g. capturing Crimea) are 100% unobtainable versus a foe with strategic nuclear weapons. This leaves no path to "Ukrainian Victory". How long is this sustainable?
    ____

    Prigozhin does not represent a liberal/left putsch. Is the Kiev regime really better off if Putin falls?

    It may buy time, but does little to resolve the underlying geopolitical flashpoint. Prigozhin would have to respond to Kiev aggression against Russian ethnics with choices similar to Putin's. Or, be dragged down by the Center-Right.

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @John Johnson

    , @Sean
    @John Johnson


    I openly support Ukraine but that doesn’t mean I have some weird attachment to Zelensky. I think he has done a fine job but I’ve also been critical of him in numerous areas. He made a huge mistake early in the war by not putting the military on defense in the north
     
    He didn't think Putin would dare go for a full on invasion targeting Kiev, that Russia would think it worth it, or be able to sustain it. It is unclear why, because Ukraine is not a member of Nato, and even with arms from US and its allies, Ukraine cannot match the firepower of Russian artillery.

    This war is simply not going well for Russia.
     
    Yes it is going about as badly for Russia as it could. Yet that is not all that bad because Russia is too big for Ukraine to destroy. Russia can be hurt by Ukraine but it cannot be destroyed or stopped by it. So given that Russia has the resources, nothing else it needs to be doing at the moment, and Putin intent on finishing what he started, it is merely a matter of time before Ukraine is wrecked and half the size it was when Zelensky was elected.

    Replies: @Greasy William

    , @Wokechoke
    @John Johnson

    We don’t really know what was being funnelled in and out of Bahkmut over the period of the so called battle. Looks like Prigozhin was setting up a conduit for gear, personnel and cash transfers back n forth with Kiev. The swindler should be shot.

    Shoigu was probably watching closely via satellites to quantify the level of Prigozhid’s smuggling operation. We have some idea where the Pentagon’s 6 billion accounting error ended up after seeing the abortive Jew Coup.


    Prigozhid showed up personally in the city apparently under fire, almost certainly had promises from the CIA he was safe.

  130. A123 says: • Website
    @QCIC
    @Mr. XYZ

    That treaty is gone forever.

    We will be lucky if something new can be created. It would have been much easier to apply unified pressure on China and Israel to make them join the existing treaty.

    Replies: @A123

    the West needs to make serious one-sided concessions to revive the arms control negotiation process.

    The framework you propose does not hold together:

    • Define “The West”?
    • Is the “The West” “one-side”? Clearly not. The U.S. has many difference with Europe. And, Europe is rife with internal divisions.
    • How can “not one-side” offer “one-sided” concessions?

    We do hear & understand what you are trying to say. However, it seems to be grounded in bilateral assumptions that do not hold.
    ____

    Despite the resistance of the NeoConDemocrat old guard, Americans correctly perceive the CCP as the #1 global, strategic threat.

     

     

    The WUHAN-19 leak from the CCP’s bioweapons labs at WIV has altered national priorities for the long term.

    We will be lucky if something new can be created. It would have been much easier to apply unified pressure on China and Israel to make them join the existing treaty.

    China was not interested 20+ years ago. The CCP liked the bilateral U.S.-Russia trap that restrained their American opposition. Breaking out of bilateral deals was the minimum first step towards multilateral treaties.

    It is unfortunate that a series of new arrangements did not happen. However, the U.S. would be in much worse shape versus the CCP if it had retained the bilateral framework of a bygone era. That would have been an open license for China to run amok.

    Israel’s geopolitical strategic situation is so unique, it is hard to see what could be gained by attempting to force their inclusion. Compelling Israel to participate in talks between gigantic nations would be a clever way to scuttle negotiations, thus guaranteeing no results.

    PEACE 😇

    • Replies: @QCIC
    @A123

    My main point is that if the USA and Russia had an ad hoc unified position on nuclear arms control together they could have politely pressured others into joining updated versions of some but probably not all treaties and agreements. This would have been a nice baby step to further multilateral nuclear arms reductions. This opportunity is long gone. At the time the USA/West was still in the process of building China up and working to push Russia down, so this sort of collaborative big picture was probably not talked about much. It does have a big risk of accelerating globalist agendas so maybe it is just as well it did not happen.

    I always mention Israel since I think they are the most likely to use nuclear weapons. I cannot make that case strongly, it is just a hunch. Pakistan and India tied for second. North Korea is the least likely, the other countries are in the middle.

    Now that we have decent evidence of a worldwide bioweapon attack the arms reduction treaties may need to change to keep up with the times.

    I take it as self-evident that China has lied about the size of her nuclear stockpile for decades.

  131. @AP
    @Mikhail

    You keep on being wrong.

    Looks like Ukrainian intelligence who have been warning of a Russian civil war for awhile, knew what they were talking about. Good for Budanov :-)

    Replies: @Mikhail, @Wokechoke

    I’m also reminded of the attempt to militarily overthrow Erdogan a few years ago. That action had greater potential. Keep up the wishful thinking to maintain good spirits as opposed to dealing with the sobering reality of what the Kiev regime faces.

  132. @AP
    @AP

    But I doubt there will be a 1918-1920. No desperation for a Civil War. Hopefully this ends the invasion of Ukraine, and Ukraine uses the Russian internal problems to better integrate with its Western brothers and maintain a powerful army, two factors that will prevent a future invasion by Russia. Ukraine utterly failed to take advantage of the 1990s in that way, but this time the stakes are very clear to everybody.

    As I said, Ukraine is the Poland of 1919-1920. A smaller state, but a unified state and people lavishly equipped by the West in its fight against the Russian invader.

    PS Kadyrov may still be loyal to Putin. An opportunity to rid Russia of Chechens?

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Mr. XYZ

    Пишут, что иранский КСИР готов отправить в Москву свои отряды для оказания помощи российскому правительству.

    История сомнительная, будем говорить откровенно. Без логистики, без языка, без баз любой экспедиционный корпус буквально растворится здесь. В Сирии шиитские Ваффен-СС выстраивали инфраструктуру года полтора, и только потом начали массированный заброс наемников. Тут с колес – ну очень все белыми нитками шито.

    С другой стороны, сейчас Путин может КСИРу вообще подарить все что угодно – вплоть до ядерного оружия, лишь бы спасти шкуру. Последствия в таких случаях интересуют очень слабо.

    From the Tg Channel of Anatoly Nesmiyan (Elmurid).

    If Shiah and Sunni Muslims can collaborate in the falling RusFed, if Turan and Iran unite their forces, then the future global Caliphate is rapidly becoming inevitable.

    Just wait and see, we’ll probably live long enough to see the Islamisation of most of the FUSSR and therefore Eurasia becoming a nearly certain outcome.

    That would be the outcome of the russophobic policies of the Western puppeteers.

    Erdogan must be delighted with what is going on in RusFed.

    • LOL: Yevardian
    • Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
    @Ivashka the fool

    What would really be entertaining: Singh and A. Karlin in the octagon.

    , @Yevardian
    @Ivashka the fool

    Right, I can't wait to see Kamil Galeev as the economic minister of the revived Kazan Khanate...
    This is why Armenians should be running Russian foreign policy, just imagine how much better things would have gone "Putin's nationalist turn" (TM) led him to invading Azerbaijan (with tacit Iranian support) for its oil instead... Nobody in Europe would have cared about a bunch of Muslims being blown up, we saw that already in Chechnya.

  133. Вагнеровцы пошли двумя колоннами. Первая, во главе с самим Пригожиным на Ростов, она с медиаподдержкой, публичными заявлениями, переговорами в штабе южного командования, принеобходимости должна связать наиболее боеспособные части армии и кадыровцев. Вторая, видимо во главе с Уткиным, без публикаций в сети пошла на Москву.

    From Tg Channel of Igor Dmitriev (Rus Orientalist).

  134. Теперь про Пригожина станут говорить, что он позор еврейского народа.

    From the Tg channel of Pavel Priannikov.

  135. If Shiah and Sunni Muslims can collaborate in the falling RusFed, if Turan and Iran unite their forces, then the future global Caliphate is rapidly becoming inevitable.

    Sure, on paper, or if this were a video game, it looks like the right move.

    But in the real world, in which people are motivated by a whole lot besides their spiritual commitments to honoring their haplogroups (or whatever the precise formulation you prefer to describe your own motives), calling that scenario far-fetched is the most charitable thing that could be said about it.

    • Agree: A123
    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @silviosilver


    Erdoğan said he backed the Russian government's handling of a mutiny by the Wagner mercenary army, the Kremlin said in a statement.
    President Erdoğan urged his counterpart to act with common sense and stated that Türkiye was ready to do its part to solve the situation in Russia peacefully as soon as possible.

    https://www.dailysabah.com/politics/diplomacy/president-erdogan-expresses-support-for-putin-against-rebellion

    Iran supports the rule of law in the Russian Federation and considers the latest developments there an internal Russian matter, Iranian state media quoted foreign ministry spokesperson Nasser Kanaani as saying on Saturday.

    https://www.jpost.com/breaking-news/article-747531

     

    Just wait and see.

    I was already right about the Russian Time of Troubles 3.0 (Russian revolution being the 2.0), now you will witness a progressive strengthening of the Islamic Oumma.

    The only force standing in its way in the end would be the Asian Dharmic Civilization.

    European Civilization is dying before our very own eyes.

    You just don't realize it yet.

    Replies: @AP, @silviosilver

    , @RadicalCenter
    @silviosilver

    From my as-yet limited knowledge of the types of Muslims in the Russian Federation, and in the central Asian countries who supply the lion's share of Muslim immigrants to the RF, the Sunni-Shia divide should not pose any significant obstacle to unified Turkic Muslim efforts (if such develops) to increase their political power and influence in "Russia."

    The countries with significant Shia populations simply haven't sent, and don't send, many immigrants to the RF at all: primarily Iran but also Azerbaijan, Iraq, Yemen, and because of their sheer size India and Pakistan.

    Conversely, the central-Asian countries that continue to supply so many immigrants to the RF are overwhelmingly Sunni, with very low percentages of Shia: Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan. Same with Kyrgyzstan and Turkmenistan, which apparently supply a lesser number / proportion of immigrants to the RF.

    The largest single Muslim group in Russia, the Tatars, are solid-majority Sunni as well. Same with the much smaller group, the Bashkir.

    In the Caucasus, Russia's almost-all-Muslim Chechen and Dagestani republics are likewise Sunni, not Shia, with only Dagestan having a Shia minority.

    Seems we can conclude that the Muslim population of Russia, no matter their origin, are overwhelmingly Sunni. Shia play correspondingly little role in Russian life and would have no realistic claim to power anywhere in the RF.

    It seems that Chechnya is the only jurisdiction in the RF with a fertility rate above replacement level (albeit much lower than it was only a couple decades ago). That contrasts to Slavic Russians, who have a terribly low fertility rate that shows little sign of adequate improvement. Combining the small Islamizing effect of Chechnya's growth with the larger Islamizing effect of continuing central-Asiasn Turkic immigration, Russia is on track to become slowly but steadily more Muslim, at least nominally.

    If these fertility and immigration trends don't change much, Christianity will inevitably become relatively less important and not as clearly dominant over the next two generations. There will be ever fewer Slavic Christian women of safe childbearing age in the RF, and ever more younger women from nominally Muslim families in the RF. The ratio of Muslim:Christian in the RF can start to change faster as this difference makes itself felt.

    I'd welcome correction or additional information from Russian and/or Muslim people. Thank you -

  136. A123 says: • Website
    @John Johnson
    @Sean

    Great psychological warfare to distract from the fact that Ukraine has not had a victory since November and with a fresh force of superbly equipped and trained ten brigades to play with has nowhere got through or even to the first line of Russian defences on the ground north of Crimea that has been the major Russian gain of the SMO still held to date.

    The Nazis took Ukraine in a month and Russia never fully took Bakhmut over nearly a year. A former city of 70k that is now in ruin. When this war started we were told that Russia would crush Ukraine within weeks.

    But I agree that the Prigozhin situation is excellent psychological warfare. It will absolutely undermine the Russian State TV narrative of Putin being in control of the situation. Thank you very much Prigozhin for donating your services to Ukraine. You are humiliating Putin and Russia. Well done.

    As for the offensive it is too early to judge. Offensives of this scale in modern warfare normally take months. We haven't seen the bulk of the armored attacks and the Kremlin is lying about destroying 60 leopards. They would constantly show images of them on State TV if that were true.

    Russia has heavily mined defensives and anyone expecting some quick march on Melitopol like the movies really doesn't understand how modern warfare works. There however is still very much the potential for a Russian rout so it is really just something to watch at this point.

    Kiev decided to launch on of their Storm Shadow missiles, actually the lighter payload French one (maybe more difficult to shoot down) on a key Crimean road link bridge

    It definitely needs to be hit again.

    I think Ukraine leadership, military equipment and army will be slowly but surely written down that order. Rely on it, a precision assassination of someone in Zelensky’s circle is coming in retaliation.

    Ritter and MacGregor have told us that Ukraine is weeks away from capitulation for over a year. Larry C Johnson and Moon of Alabama told us that Prigozhin was just an elaborate play by Putin.

    This war is simply not going well for Russia. I don't see why it is so difficult for Putin's defenders to make this simple admission. They seem to have a weird alpha male attachment to him like Africans and their Big Man leaders. It's really creepy. I openly support Ukraine but that doesn't mean I have some weird attachment to Zelensky. I think he has done a fine job but I've also been critical of him in numerous areas. He made a huge mistake early in the war by not putting the military on defense in the north.

    Replies: @A123, @Sean, @Wokechoke

    This war is simply not going well for Russia. I don’t see why it is so difficult for Putin’s defenders to make this simple admission.

    Just about everyone has admitted that RF forces underperformed expectations. Especially in the initial weeks. The logistics problems were epic and took months to sort out.

    However, Zelensky’s defenders need to make an equally damning admission.

    Without ~€8 Billion/Month of external support flowing to the Kiev regime, underperforming Russian Forces would be able to grind out a predictable victory in Ukraine.

    Ukie Maximalism resembles the Muslim Occupation of Gaza, Judea, & Samaria — Heavily propped up by outside interests. Zelensky is in constant international diplomacy, desperately attempting to raise funds to continue the fight. And, the stated goals (e.g. capturing Crimea) are 100% unobtainable versus a foe with strategic nuclear weapons. This leaves no path to “Ukrainian Victory”. How long is this sustainable?
    ____

    Prigozhin does not represent a liberal/left putsch. Is the Kiev regime really better off if Putin falls?

    It may buy time, but does little to resolve the underlying geopolitical flashpoint. Prigozhin would have to respond to Kiev aggression against Russian ethnics with choices similar to Putin’s. Or, be dragged down by the Center-Right.

    PEACE 😇

    • Replies: @John Johnson
    @A123

    Just about everyone has admitted that RF forces underperformed expectations. Especially in the initial weeks. The logistics problems were epic and took months to sort out.

    MacGregor, Ritter, Larry C Johnson, MoA and Pepe made no such admissions. Go ahead and quote them if you think I missed a post.

    They simply didn't discuss how Russia was pushed out of Kiev.

    They all moved on to "Russia will wipe Ukraine off the map any moment now".

    In fact some of the earlier posts by pro-Putin bloggers have been removed. They now have time gaps around the invasion.

    Without ~€8 Billion/Month of external support flowing to the Kiev regime, underperforming Russian Forces would be able to grind out a predictable victory in Ukraine.

    I was told here that Bakhmut would be taken in weeks....repeatedly. It is back to being contended and a Russian city has been taken by Wagner.

    But you are certain that Russia will eventually take Ukraine? The Abrams haven't even arrived.

    Prigozhin does not represent a liberal/left putsch. Is the Kiev regime really better off if Putin falls?

    I don't support liberalism nor the left. I am against this stupid invasion which has proven to be a complete disaster. I was called a Jew for asking how this benefits Whites or undermines the Western status quo. Still waiting for a rational explanation on how killing Slavs in trenches and carving out a rump state for Putin's abortion empire will undermine liberalism or globalism. No one here denies that Russia has the world's highest abortion rate and a declining Slavic population. But the war is good for us and them because....????? Still waiting.

    Prigozhin taking power is unlikely but would be an improvement. He recently stated that the invasion was based on lies and is really about egos. That is similar to what I have been saying from the beginning. That was obvious when Russia made zero attempts at diplomacy and in fact cut the phone lines with Kiev.

  137. @Ivashka the fool
    @AP


    Пишут, что иранский КСИР готов отправить в Москву свои отряды для оказания помощи российскому правительству.

    История сомнительная, будем говорить откровенно. Без логистики, без языка, без баз любой экспедиционный корпус буквально растворится здесь. В Сирии шиитские Ваффен-СС выстраивали инфраструктуру года полтора, и только потом начали массированный заброс наемников. Тут с колес - ну очень все белыми нитками шито.

    С другой стороны, сейчас Путин может КСИРу вообще подарить все что угодно - вплоть до ядерного оружия, лишь бы спасти шкуру. Последствия в таких случаях интересуют очень слабо.
     

    From the Tg Channel of Anatoly Nesmiyan (Elmurid).

    If Shiah and Sunni Muslims can collaborate in the falling RusFed, if Turan and Iran unite their forces, then the future global Caliphate is rapidly becoming inevitable.

    Just wait and see, we'll probably live long enough to see the Islamisation of most of the FUSSR and therefore Eurasia becoming a nearly certain outcome.

    That would be the outcome of the russophobic policies of the Western puppeteers.

    Erdogan must be delighted with what is going on in RusFed.

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Yevardian

    What would really be entertaining: Singh and A. Karlin in the octagon.

  138. @silviosilver

    If Shiah and Sunni Muslims can collaborate in the falling RusFed, if Turan and Iran unite their forces, then the future global Caliphate is rapidly becoming inevitable.
     
    Sure, on paper, or if this were a video game, it looks like the right move.

    But in the real world, in which people are motivated by a whole lot besides their spiritual commitments to honoring their haplogroups (or whatever the precise formulation you prefer to describe your own motives), calling that scenario far-fetched is the most charitable thing that could be said about it.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @RadicalCenter

    Erdoğan said he backed the Russian government’s handling of a mutiny by the Wagner mercenary army, the Kremlin said in a statement.
    President Erdoğan urged his counterpart to act with common sense and stated that Türkiye was ready to do its part to solve the situation in Russia peacefully as soon as possible.

    https://www.dailysabah.com/politics/diplomacy/president-erdogan-expresses-support-for-putin-against-rebellion

    Iran supports the rule of law in the Russian Federation and considers the latest developments there an internal Russian matter, Iranian state media quoted foreign ministry spokesperson Nasser Kanaani as saying on Saturday.

    https://www.jpost.com/breaking-news/article-747531

    Just wait and see.

    I was already right about the Russian Time of Troubles 3.0 (Russian revolution being the 2.0), now you will witness a progressive strengthening of the Islamic Oumma.

    The only force standing in its way in the end would be the Asian Dharmic Civilization.

    European Civilization is dying before our very own eyes.

    You just don’t realize it yet.

    • Replies: @AP
    @Ivashka the fool


    I was already right about the Russian Time of Troubles 3.0 (Russian revolution being the 2.0), now you will witness a progressive strengthening of the Islamic Oumma.
     
    Other than in the Caucuses, Muslim TFR in Russia is not much better than Russian TFR. It is higher in Central Asia, but not nearly on sub-Saharan African levels. So Russia's population declines, but Muslims become a bigger slice of the shrinking pie. But not enough to swamp it.

    This may give Ukraine the chance to completely extricate itself from the Russian mess and the Eurasian World.

    The only force standing in its way in the end would be the Asian Dharmic Civilization
     
    The Americas are not going to go Muslim. And in Africa, Christianity and Islam are each expanding

    European Civilization is dying before our very own eyes.
     
    Putin wasn't going to save it.

    If it is to be saved, it will be saved by a renewal within Europe, that's the only hope. Probably starting from the East (which does not include Russia-Eurasia, though who knows, the very unlikely acts of salvaging parts of Russia such as Kalinigrad might not be bad). Ukraine adds tens of millions to that. Belarus coming along (unlikely but not impossible) would be great also. So expand the healthy East as much as is feasible, while renewing the West. Keep the Eurasian hordes at bay, they might be busy for awhile, if so it's an opportunity to consolidate and strengthen the Ukrainian bulwark. Time must not be squandered as it had been in the 1990s. And when Eurasia is no longer a threat, it can be a friend.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Hartnell

    , @silviosilver
    @Ivashka the fool


    I was already right about the Russian Time of Troubles 3.0 (Russian revolution being the 2.0), now you will witness a progressive strengthening of the Islamic Oumma.
     
    If you think the two news items you linked are evidence of this, then frankly, you are imagining things. Some analyses miss the forest for trees; you take such a big picture view of the world that you inevitably end up doing the opposite. It's like taking the fact that I am a 'racist' and thinking you can predict when I will replace my washing machine and what brand I will buy.

    Remember, you said: If Shiah and Sunni Muslims can collaborate in the falling RusFed, if Turan and Iran unite their forces, then the future global Caliphate is rapidly becoming inevitable.

    As conjecture, sure, that's plausible. It's trying to interpret contemporary events through that prism that gets you into trouble. Are they muslim and does being muslim matter to them? Yes and yes. But like Walt Whitman, the individuals concerned - the "trees" but for which there would be no forest - contradict themselves, they are large, they contain multitudes. And that's without even mentioning that nothing in the present state-centric global order evinces the slightest preparation for moving towards a "caliphate."

    You said not long ago that if you were Arab, you would dedicate your every making moment to wiping out Israel. Okay, fine. But you seem to have a hard time understanding that not everybody is similarly motivated by thumotic identitarian considerations.


    European Civilization is dying before our very own eyes.
     
    European people certainly are, and with them much of what we conceive of European civilization. But the woke clownshow that is responsible for that death is also a part of that civilization, and it may have more life in it than you or I think. As Dmitry (for once correctly) keeps pointing out, its basic liberal tenets (though not its excesses) prove more attractive to muslims than islam proves to liberals.

    Replies: @Yahya

  139. @A123
    @John Johnson


    This war is simply not going well for Russia. I don’t see why it is so difficult for Putin’s defenders to make this simple admission.
     
    Just about everyone has admitted that RF forces underperformed expectations. Especially in the initial weeks. The logistics problems were epic and took months to sort out.

    However, Zelensky's defenders need to make an equally damning admission.

    Without ~€8 Billion/Month of external support flowing to the Kiev regime, underperforming Russian Forces would be able to grind out a predictable victory in Ukraine.

    Ukie Maximalism resembles the Muslim Occupation of Gaza, Judea, & Samaria -- Heavily propped up by outside interests. Zelensky is in constant international diplomacy, desperately attempting to raise funds to continue the fight. And, the stated goals (e.g. capturing Crimea) are 100% unobtainable versus a foe with strategic nuclear weapons. This leaves no path to "Ukrainian Victory". How long is this sustainable?
    ____

    Prigozhin does not represent a liberal/left putsch. Is the Kiev regime really better off if Putin falls?

    It may buy time, but does little to resolve the underlying geopolitical flashpoint. Prigozhin would have to respond to Kiev aggression against Russian ethnics with choices similar to Putin's. Or, be dragged down by the Center-Right.

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @John Johnson

    Just about everyone has admitted that RF forces underperformed expectations. Especially in the initial weeks. The logistics problems were epic and took months to sort out.

    MacGregor, Ritter, Larry C Johnson, MoA and Pepe made no such admissions. Go ahead and quote them if you think I missed a post.

    They simply didn’t discuss how Russia was pushed out of Kiev.

    They all moved on to “Russia will wipe Ukraine off the map any moment now”.

    In fact some of the earlier posts by pro-Putin bloggers have been removed. They now have time gaps around the invasion.

    Without ~€8 Billion/Month of external support flowing to the Kiev regime, underperforming Russian Forces would be able to grind out a predictable victory in Ukraine.

    I was told here that Bakhmut would be taken in weeks….repeatedly. It is back to being contended and a Russian city has been taken by Wagner.

    But you are certain that Russia will eventually take Ukraine? The Abrams haven’t even arrived.

    Prigozhin does not represent a liberal/left putsch. Is the Kiev regime really better off if Putin falls?

    I don’t support liberalism nor the left. I am against this stupid invasion which has proven to be a complete disaster. I was called a Jew for asking how this benefits Whites or undermines the Western status quo. Still waiting for a rational explanation on how killing Slavs in trenches and carving out a rump state for Putin’s abortion empire will undermine liberalism or globalism. No one here denies that Russia has the world’s highest abortion rate and a declining Slavic population. But the war is good for us and them because….????? Still waiting.

    Prigozhin taking power is unlikely but would be an improvement. He recently stated that the invasion was based on lies and is really about egos. That is similar to what I have been saying from the beginning. That was obvious when Russia made zero attempts at diplomacy and in fact cut the phone lines with Kiev.

  140. @Beckow
    @QCIC

    This JJ guy is not capable of responding to factual points. Look how he runs away every time we ask him a specific question. "Moldova" for god's sake? Even better, "a leaked plan to invade Moldova" means to JJ that Putin is Peter The Great, or something stupid like that. He has no answers, so he escapes into absurdity - it is something Anglos do a lot and think that nobody sees through it. But it is very transparent - they run away from a normal discussion when someone asks about ABM, Kosovo, Iraq, Nato in Ukraine, Kiev's bombing of Donbas, banning Russian after Maidan, etc...it is infantile.

    JJ will not address how extremely destabilizing was US decision to drop out of the ABM Treaty. Until he does, it is best to just ignore him. He has told us about this incredible "winning" offensive by Kiev that looks like a dud. Now he tells us about Prigozhin or whomever changing topics to run away. Tomorrow he will drop Prigozhin and tell us about other cacamonie 'news', or 'predictions'. It is a technique - scream and shout to hide one's intentions and what is going on......like good British clowns they are...:)

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @Boethiuss, @AP, @John Johnson

    If Putin falls will you become Prigozhin’s lackey?

    Or revert to Orban’s lackey?

    You will have difficult decisions to make, Beckow. Whose boots to lick?

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @AP

    The GRU general Alekseyev, responsible for the military interactions with the PMCs have been seen on video, discussing in Rostov with Prigozhin and telling him: "You need Shoigu? Go and take him" (Вам нужен Шойгу ? Берите на здоровье). The Russian nationalists fighting on Ukrainian side have expressed their support for Wagnerite uprising. Thousands of troops are supposedly moving from DNR into RusFed. Time of Troubles 2.0. Sobyanin has declared Monday a non-working day in Moscow. Private businesses jets are flying off Moscow airports going leaving to Dubai.

    Replies: @AP

    , @Wokechoke
    @AP

    which rainbow dildo is shoved up your arse though?

  141. @Beckow
    @QCIC

    This JJ guy is not capable of responding to factual points. Look how he runs away every time we ask him a specific question. "Moldova" for god's sake? Even better, "a leaked plan to invade Moldova" means to JJ that Putin is Peter The Great, or something stupid like that. He has no answers, so he escapes into absurdity - it is something Anglos do a lot and think that nobody sees through it. But it is very transparent - they run away from a normal discussion when someone asks about ABM, Kosovo, Iraq, Nato in Ukraine, Kiev's bombing of Donbas, banning Russian after Maidan, etc...it is infantile.

    JJ will not address how extremely destabilizing was US decision to drop out of the ABM Treaty. Until he does, it is best to just ignore him. He has told us about this incredible "winning" offensive by Kiev that looks like a dud. Now he tells us about Prigozhin or whomever changing topics to run away. Tomorrow he will drop Prigozhin and tell us about other cacamonie 'news', or 'predictions'. It is a technique - scream and shout to hide one's intentions and what is going on......like good British clowns they are...:)

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @Boethiuss, @AP, @John Johnson

    This JJ guy is not capable of responding to factual points. Look how he runs away every time we ask him a specific question. “Moldova” for god’s sake?

    Are you claiming the leaked plan to invade Moldova is fake?

    Also the leaked plan to absorb Belarus is fake?

    All fake? Is that your position?

    Putin is just a really swell guy that would never do anything like that? All just lies? Remember when Putin’s defenders said the same thing about the leaked plans to invade Ukraine? Scott Ritter is in fact on record stating that the idea is outrageous because Russia would never do such a thing. Then he switched to the position that the war was over. Now he claims that the Russia is about to win. Right Scott.

    JJ will not address how extremely destabilizing was US decision to drop out of the ABM Treaty.

    I asked how invading Ukraine changes the nuclear situation with the United States.

    Do explain how the invasion mitigates a treaty from 20 years ago.

    Putin has not cited the ABM as a cause so do explain this theory.

    I am in agreement with Prigozhin which is that the war was based on lies and Ukraine was never a security threat to Russia. Better hope that Putin takes him out so you can ignore him as well.

    Oh and Igor Girkin thinks Putin is a dunce when it comes to war. That is the former DPR leader that initially supported the invasion.

    You might want to reassess your determination to defend Putin. He is losing supporters by the day.

    • Replies: @Beckow
    @John Johnson


    ...Are you claiming the leaked plan to invade Moldova is fake?
     
    I really don't care if it is a contingency plan, fake, or some piece of paper that each military keeps 'just in case'. US certainly has them and some have also been leaked. You are a hopeless simpleton, read what you said: "a leaked plan to invade Moldova"...that is what you base your thinking on? You sound like a kindergardener who heard that "there is possibly candy in that closet!" Grow up.

    Do explain how the invasion mitigates a treaty from 20 years ago.
    Putin has not cited the ABM as a cause so do explain this theory.
     
    Controlling Ukraine and keeping Nato out means that US can't place its missiles - "defensive" as you say, another of your outright lies and idiocies - right on Russia's borders close to Moscow. That is so obvious and such a clear "mitigation" that you must be really stupid or very dishonest to ask that question.

    And not "cited"? How do you know? Where you sitting at Kremlin's meetings all these years? Politicians in public talk about what benefits them and what is understood by the ordinary people - maybe 5% of people even know what "ABM treaty" was. Again, you argue on a very low level. Why doesn't Biden mention the US heroic wars on Serbia, Iraq and Afghanistan in his speeches?

  142. So can we finally confirm that Russians really are just Snow Niggers?

  143. @Boethiuss
    @Beckow


    Now he tells us about Prigozhin or whomever changing topics to run away. Tomorrow he will drop Prigozhin and tell us about.......
     
    Changing topics? Oh my fuccing word!!

    Obviously any responsible commenter of the situation has to address random bullshit grievance theories like ABM (or Russian language regulation in Donbas, or whatever).

    Wagner PMC in open battle against the Russian MoD, in control of Rostov and Voroneh and advancing on Moscow, that's obviously a distraction.

    Replies: @Beckow

    You are – as always – getting too excited with anticipation. It looks like the usual internal dispute in a country at war between the moderates and the radicals, or possibly some foreign-sponsored forces. What are you going to do if it fizzles out or fails?

    The giddy excitement that the likes of JJ, AP, Mr. Hacks or you go through at any sign of “good news” betrays your insecurity. Get something done first, your breathless, boastful “Kremlin is about to fall!“, “we are taking Crimea!” talk makes you look slightly ridiculous. The main effect so far is that the 80-90% of people in Russia who are on the moderate, but by now firmly anti-Western side, are being consolidated. Given the the West needs either the liberals or the radicals take over in Russia, this is not good news for them. They can’t handle sober self-serving Russia, they would like anything else instead. I strongly doubt they will get it. But it is entertaining…

    This has a feeling of our not-so-distant future being very different than anyone has predicted, a turn in human development. I have said before that the Maidan-2022 war, Trump, C19, Brexit will all be in an introductory chapter called Causes. Of course, we have to make it through and there is someone left to write it…:). But I would not celebrate if I were you – the crisis is accelerating and that is not good for anyone.

    • Replies: @AP
    @Beckow

    The most likely result of the war was going to be a draw, with the strong possibility of Ukraine taking back the Crimean corridor. Russian infighting just weakens Russia's chances, either way some Russian forces are lost through internal battles. The more, the better for Ukraine. Russia's government has already lost several helicopters and fuel storage facilities within Russia, some Wagnerites have been bombed by the Russian government. Russians positions in Ukraine are being lost. Good thing Ukraine waited with its offensive, better to start against a weakened enemy (unless Russian forces leave without a fight, not impossible). If Wagner is crushed, Russia lost some of it's better forces for the future battles.

    So whose ass you gonna lick if Putin falls? Prigozhin, Orban, Kadyrov? Genuinely curious.

    Replies: @Beckow

    , @John Johnson
    @Beckow

    The giddy excitement that the likes of JJ, AP, Mr. Hacks or you go through at any sign of “good news” betrays your insecurity.

    It is entirely good news for those of us that support Ukraine. What is wrong with being excited about good news?

    This has been an embarrassment for Putin and his US basement defense force.

    Half of them were still holding out for the theory that Prigozhin's insubordinance was all an elaborate 5D chess play.

    Well that is out which means Putin is unable to control him and Bakhmut was never a trap.

    Would have been nice if the dwarf shot it out with brainy orc but this is all still a wonderful development.

    It will still be fun to see how Russian State TV tries to spin this. They have also been promoting the theory that everything has been by Putin's design as if he is Palpatine and we mortals can't comprehend his complex plans.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @Beckow

  144. @John Johnson
    @Beckow

    This JJ guy is not capable of responding to factual points. Look how he runs away every time we ask him a specific question. “Moldova” for god’s sake?

    Are you claiming the leaked plan to invade Moldova is fake?

    Also the leaked plan to absorb Belarus is fake?

    All fake? Is that your position?

    Putin is just a really swell guy that would never do anything like that? All just lies? Remember when Putin's defenders said the same thing about the leaked plans to invade Ukraine? Scott Ritter is in fact on record stating that the idea is outrageous because Russia would never do such a thing. Then he switched to the position that the war was over. Now he claims that the Russia is about to win. Right Scott.

    JJ will not address how extremely destabilizing was US decision to drop out of the ABM Treaty.

    I asked how invading Ukraine changes the nuclear situation with the United States.

    Do explain how the invasion mitigates a treaty from 20 years ago.

    Putin has not cited the ABM as a cause so do explain this theory.

    I am in agreement with Prigozhin which is that the war was based on lies and Ukraine was never a security threat to Russia. Better hope that Putin takes him out so you can ignore him as well.

    Oh and Igor Girkin thinks Putin is a dunce when it comes to war. That is the former DPR leader that initially supported the invasion.

    You might want to reassess your determination to defend Putin. He is losing supporters by the day.

    Replies: @Beckow

    …Are you claiming the leaked plan to invade Moldova is fake?

    I really don’t care if it is a contingency plan, fake, or some piece of paper that each military keeps ‘just in case‘. US certainly has them and some have also been leaked. You are a hopeless simpleton, read what you said: “a leaked plan to invade Moldova“…that is what you base your thinking on? You sound like a kindergardener who heard that “there is possibly candy in that closet!” Grow up.

    Do explain how the invasion mitigates a treaty from 20 years ago.
    Putin has not cited the ABM as a cause so do explain this theory.

    Controlling Ukraine and keeping Nato out means that US can’t place its missiles – “defensive” as you say, another of your outright lies and idiocies – right on Russia’s borders close to Moscow. That is so obvious and such a clear “mitigation” that you must be really stupid or very dishonest to ask that question.

    And not “cited”? How do you know? Where you sitting at Kremlin’s meetings all these years? Politicians in public talk about what benefits them and what is understood by the ordinary people – maybe 5% of people even know what “ABM treaty” was. Again, you argue on a very low level. Why doesn’t Biden mention the US heroic wars on Serbia, Iraq and Afghanistan in his speeches?

  145. Reuters is reporting Voronezh has fallen, though it’s unverified.

    https://www.aol.com/ukraine;russia-war-live-furious-085913580.html

    Putin’s speech to Rusfed with subtitles:

    ‘It’s a stab in the back!’

  146. AP says:
    @Ivashka the fool
    @silviosilver


    Erdoğan said he backed the Russian government's handling of a mutiny by the Wagner mercenary army, the Kremlin said in a statement.
    President Erdoğan urged his counterpart to act with common sense and stated that Türkiye was ready to do its part to solve the situation in Russia peacefully as soon as possible.

    https://www.dailysabah.com/politics/diplomacy/president-erdogan-expresses-support-for-putin-against-rebellion

    Iran supports the rule of law in the Russian Federation and considers the latest developments there an internal Russian matter, Iranian state media quoted foreign ministry spokesperson Nasser Kanaani as saying on Saturday.

    https://www.jpost.com/breaking-news/article-747531

     

    Just wait and see.

    I was already right about the Russian Time of Troubles 3.0 (Russian revolution being the 2.0), now you will witness a progressive strengthening of the Islamic Oumma.

    The only force standing in its way in the end would be the Asian Dharmic Civilization.

    European Civilization is dying before our very own eyes.

    You just don't realize it yet.

    Replies: @AP, @silviosilver

    I was already right about the Russian Time of Troubles 3.0 (Russian revolution being the 2.0), now you will witness a progressive strengthening of the Islamic Oumma.

    Other than in the Caucuses, Muslim TFR in Russia is not much better than Russian TFR. It is higher in Central Asia, but not nearly on sub-Saharan African levels. So Russia’s population declines, but Muslims become a bigger slice of the shrinking pie. But not enough to swamp it.

    This may give Ukraine the chance to completely extricate itself from the Russian mess and the Eurasian World.

    The only force standing in its way in the end would be the Asian Dharmic Civilization

    The Americas are not going to go Muslim. And in Africa, Christianity and Islam are each expanding

    European Civilization is dying before our very own eyes.

    Putin wasn’t going to save it.

    If it is to be saved, it will be saved by a renewal within Europe, that’s the only hope. Probably starting from the East (which does not include Russia-Eurasia, though who knows, the very unlikely acts of salvaging parts of Russia such as Kalinigrad might not be bad). Ukraine adds tens of millions to that. Belarus coming along (unlikely but not impossible) would be great also. So expand the healthy East as much as is feasible, while renewing the West. Keep the Eurasian hordes at bay, they might be busy for awhile, if so it’s an opportunity to consolidate and strengthen the Ukrainian bulwark. Time must not be squandered as it had been in the 1990s. And when Eurasia is no longer a threat, it can be a friend.

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @AP


    Putin wasn’t going to save it.
     
    Have I ever written anything opposite?

    If it is to be saved, it will be saved by a renewal within Europe, that’s the only hope.
     
    There will be none. The Globalists will prevent this.

    Keep the Eurasian hordes at bay, they might be busy for awhile, if so it’s an opportunity to consolidate and strengthen the Ukrainian bulwark.
     
    Demographics are destiny. Eastern Europe is aging and dying off. Younger EE people will emigrate. Younger Central Asian people will immigrate.

    Replies: @AP

    , @Hartnell
    @AP

    I agree with Ivashka here. The Eastern European Youth are too obsessed with democracy, freedom, individualism and in general having a good quality of life. The fate of Europe or whether the original inhabitants are replaced by the third world is not on their radar.

    To be honest, saving Europe itself will have to be on the West's initiative at this stage. The Slavs are not going to do it. Which means the Western Populists must actually start to take power and do populist things. So far, they are not but events dear boy, events.

    Replies: @AP

  147. AP says:
    @Beckow
    @Boethiuss

    You are - as always - getting too excited with anticipation. It looks like the usual internal dispute in a country at war between the moderates and the radicals, or possibly some foreign-sponsored forces. What are you going to do if it fizzles out or fails?

    The giddy excitement that the likes of JJ, AP, Mr. Hacks or you go through at any sign of "good news" betrays your insecurity. Get something done first, your breathless, boastful "Kremlin is about to fall!", "we are taking Crimea!" talk makes you look slightly ridiculous. The main effect so far is that the 80-90% of people in Russia who are on the moderate, but by now firmly anti-Western side, are being consolidated. Given the the West needs either the liberals or the radicals take over in Russia, this is not good news for them. They can't handle sober self-serving Russia, they would like anything else instead. I strongly doubt they will get it. But it is entertaining...

    This has a feeling of our not-so-distant future being very different than anyone has predicted, a turn in human development. I have said before that the Maidan-2022 war, Trump, C19, Brexit will all be in an introductory chapter called Causes. Of course, we have to make it through and there is someone left to write it...:). But I would not celebrate if I were you - the crisis is accelerating and that is not good for anyone.

    Replies: @AP, @John Johnson

    The most likely result of the war was going to be a draw, with the strong possibility of Ukraine taking back the Crimean corridor. Russian infighting just weakens Russia’s chances, either way some Russian forces are lost through internal battles. The more, the better for Ukraine. Russia’s government has already lost several helicopters and fuel storage facilities within Russia, some Wagnerites have been bombed by the Russian government. Russians positions in Ukraine are being lost. Good thing Ukraine waited with its offensive, better to start against a weakened enemy (unless Russian forces leave without a fight, not impossible). If Wagner is crushed, Russia lost some of it’s better forces for the future battles.

    So whose ass you gonna lick if Putin falls? Prigozhin, Orban, Kadyrov? Genuinely curious.

    • Replies: @Beckow
    @AP

    For the guy like you who has been licking like mad everyone from the Banderites to the long-gone Habsburgs, you should stay away from that term, it makes you look even more weird and ridiculous.


    The most likely result of the war was going to be a draw, with the strong possibility of Ukraine taking back the Crimean corridor.
     
    A draw is defined as neither side gaining anything. So far Russia has gained: Crimea: most of Donbas, the Azov Sea corridor. Plus it has blocked (for now) Ukraine in Nato and seriously weakened Ukraine internally - millions left (permanently), infrastructure and economy destroyed.

    The West has gained Finland in Nato - wow! as if Finland was previously not a de facto Western outpost, weakened Russia internationally, and a hope that Ukies will keep on dying for Nato, since Natoids are clearly unwilling to do it.

    Ukraine has gained Western sympathy and...actually what else? maybe I am missing something, but what else other than future hopes has Kiev gained? Why don't you tell us.

    Based on the above Russia is winning over Ukraine, and the West is in a draw with Russia. Get the narrative straight and stop mixing up what you are hoping will happen with what has actually happened o far.

    Replies: @AP, @Greasy William

  148. @AP
    @Beckow

    If Putin falls will you become Prigozhin's lackey?

    Or revert to Orban's lackey?

    You will have difficult decisions to make, Beckow. Whose boots to lick?

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Wokechoke

    The GRU general Alekseyev, responsible for the military interactions with the PMCs have been seen on video, discussing in Rostov with Prigozhin and telling him: “You need Shoigu? Go and take him” (Вам нужен Шойгу ? Берите на здоровье). The Russian nationalists fighting on Ukrainian side have expressed their support for Wagnerite uprising. Thousands of troops are supposedly moving from DNR into RusFed. Time of Troubles 2.0. Sobyanin has declared Monday a non-working day in Moscow. Private businesses jets are flying off Moscow airports going leaving to Dubai.

    • Replies: @AP
    @Ivashka the fool

    Note that when Ukraine was attacked, most Ukrainians stayed. My cousin, a successful businessman, cut short a ski holiday in the European Alps, dropped his wife and kids off in Poland, and rushed back to Lviv when Ukraine was attacked (he signed up for territorial defense but wasn't sent to war in the East, I guess his group was held back in case Belarus would attack from the north).

    But RusFed flees. Their lackey Beckow would do the same, he was predicting that Ukrainian would all escape, the army would dissolve and flee. surrender, etc. Based on what he would certainly have done.

    Ukrainians are telling Russians to go home and sort out their country. Hopefully it won't be too bloody, but will take a long time, so that by the time Russia is in a position to threaten somebody again Ukraine will be too integrated with the West, and too powerful, to be worth the trouble. When I pray for peace and victory, I do not pray for maximum death and destruction upon the Russian soldiers, but that they simply leave Ukraine.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

  149. @AP
    @Ivashka the fool


    I was already right about the Russian Time of Troubles 3.0 (Russian revolution being the 2.0), now you will witness a progressive strengthening of the Islamic Oumma.
     
    Other than in the Caucuses, Muslim TFR in Russia is not much better than Russian TFR. It is higher in Central Asia, but not nearly on sub-Saharan African levels. So Russia's population declines, but Muslims become a bigger slice of the shrinking pie. But not enough to swamp it.

    This may give Ukraine the chance to completely extricate itself from the Russian mess and the Eurasian World.

    The only force standing in its way in the end would be the Asian Dharmic Civilization
     
    The Americas are not going to go Muslim. And in Africa, Christianity and Islam are each expanding

    European Civilization is dying before our very own eyes.
     
    Putin wasn't going to save it.

    If it is to be saved, it will be saved by a renewal within Europe, that's the only hope. Probably starting from the East (which does not include Russia-Eurasia, though who knows, the very unlikely acts of salvaging parts of Russia such as Kalinigrad might not be bad). Ukraine adds tens of millions to that. Belarus coming along (unlikely but not impossible) would be great also. So expand the healthy East as much as is feasible, while renewing the West. Keep the Eurasian hordes at bay, they might be busy for awhile, if so it's an opportunity to consolidate and strengthen the Ukrainian bulwark. Time must not be squandered as it had been in the 1990s. And when Eurasia is no longer a threat, it can be a friend.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Hartnell

    Putin wasn’t going to save it.

    Have I ever written anything opposite?

    If it is to be saved, it will be saved by a renewal within Europe, that’s the only hope.

    There will be none. The Globalists will prevent this.

    Keep the Eurasian hordes at bay, they might be busy for awhile, if so it’s an opportunity to consolidate and strengthen the Ukrainian bulwark.

    Demographics are destiny. Eastern Europe is aging and dying off. Younger EE people will emigrate. Younger Central Asian people will immigrate.

    • Agree: Yahya
    • Replies: @AP
    @Ivashka the fool


    "Putin wasn’t going to save it."

    Have I ever written anything opposite?
     
    Never.

    But many deluded Westerners thought otherwise.

    "If it is to be saved, it will be saved by a renewal within Europe, that’s the only hope."

    There will be none. The Globalists will prevent this.
     
    Possible but far from certain.

    Again, if European civilization is to be saved, it will be through renewal and not by Russia which has its own sort of civilizaton (and certainly not RusFed).

    And renewal will depend on Eastern Europe, a large area that is the least invaded and most traditional. The bigger this region is, the better the chances. Adding Ukraine and, God willing, Belarus, would be very helpful.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

  150. @John Johnson
    @QCIC

    The war is about Western aggressive moves to corner Russia and make it a vassal of the West or a failed state.

    Yet another excuse. The only consistency among Putin supporters is that they can't maintain a consistent explanation for the war.

    You told me in this very thread that it is about the ABM and now it is about countering Western plans to make Russia a vassal state.

    You can't even maintain a consistent explanation over a 24 hour period.

    In the 1420 videos it is clear that Russians themselves can't explain why the war exists.

    Putin himself has given at least four different explanations.

    Coup in Ukraine

    Do explain how there was a coup when the removed pro-Russian president was disavowed by his own party as a corrupt criminal.

    Replies: @QCIC

    My explanation of Russia’s requirements from the SMO has been roughly the same for a long time. I do think Putin is more of a moderate than I previously realized. I use different words to describe the situation to better explain my position. If you are confused, try a thesaurus.

    If it looks like a coup, walks like a coup and talks like a coup that’s what I call it.

    My biggest questions have always been what happens in Ukraine West of the river and also how does Russia reintegrate the city of Kiev.

    I have also always said there is some chance the whole thing is fake/preordained. This latest Prigozhin gimmick might be in that category.

    I don’t know what is going on in Russia. Here are some possibilities.

    Maybe Putin is ready to retire and he is cleaning house (Shoigu) on the way out?

    Maybe the powers that be need a really big distraction? The fake submersible wasn’t enough for this month.

    Maybe Prigozhin vigorously stirring the pot gives the West an out from Ukraine? [I hope]

    Maybe Zhenya is ready to retire?

    Maybe you can retire!

  151. @AP
    @Ivashka the fool


    I was already right about the Russian Time of Troubles 3.0 (Russian revolution being the 2.0), now you will witness a progressive strengthening of the Islamic Oumma.
     
    Other than in the Caucuses, Muslim TFR in Russia is not much better than Russian TFR. It is higher in Central Asia, but not nearly on sub-Saharan African levels. So Russia's population declines, but Muslims become a bigger slice of the shrinking pie. But not enough to swamp it.

    This may give Ukraine the chance to completely extricate itself from the Russian mess and the Eurasian World.

    The only force standing in its way in the end would be the Asian Dharmic Civilization
     
    The Americas are not going to go Muslim. And in Africa, Christianity and Islam are each expanding

    European Civilization is dying before our very own eyes.
     
    Putin wasn't going to save it.

    If it is to be saved, it will be saved by a renewal within Europe, that's the only hope. Probably starting from the East (which does not include Russia-Eurasia, though who knows, the very unlikely acts of salvaging parts of Russia such as Kalinigrad might not be bad). Ukraine adds tens of millions to that. Belarus coming along (unlikely but not impossible) would be great also. So expand the healthy East as much as is feasible, while renewing the West. Keep the Eurasian hordes at bay, they might be busy for awhile, if so it's an opportunity to consolidate and strengthen the Ukrainian bulwark. Time must not be squandered as it had been in the 1990s. And when Eurasia is no longer a threat, it can be a friend.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Hartnell

    I agree with Ivashka here. The Eastern European Youth are too obsessed with democracy, freedom, individualism and in general having a good quality of life. The fate of Europe or whether the original inhabitants are replaced by the third world is not on their radar.

    To be honest, saving Europe itself will have to be on the West’s initiative at this stage. The Slavs are not going to do it. Which means the Western Populists must actually start to take power and do populist things. So far, they are not but events dear boy, events.

    • Replies: @AP
    @Hartnell


    The Eastern European Youth are too obsessed with democracy, freedom, individualism and in general having a good quality of life.
     
    Sure, they are young. But they are not Woke. They are normal.

    To be honest, saving Europe itself will have to be on the West’s initiative at this stage. The Slavs are not going to do it.
     
    The Slavs cannot do it alone, but their large reservoir of generally conservative people and large territories with few foreigners are probably necessary for eventual renewal. Ukraine would be almost like another Poland in terms of population. Belarus (if...) another Hungary.

    Italy seems to be the first Western country to flip. Support for traditional forces is strongest among the young there.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Dmitry

  152. @A123
    @QCIC


    the West needs to make serious one-sided concessions to revive the arms control negotiation process.
     
    The framework you propose does not hold together:

    • Define "The West"?
    • Is the "The West" "one-side"? Clearly not. The U.S. has many difference with Europe. And, Europe is rife with internal divisions.
    • How can "not one-side" offer "one-sided" concessions?

    We do hear & understand what you are trying to say. However, it seems to be grounded in bilateral assumptions that do not hold.
    ____

    Despite the resistance of the NeoConDemocrat old guard, Americans correctly perceive the CCP as the #1 global, strategic threat.

     
    https://globalaffairs.org/sites/default/files/2020-10/Research/200518-pew-china-us-threats.png
     

    The WUHAN-19 leak from the CCP's bioweapons labs at WIV has altered national priorities for the long term.

    We will be lucky if something new can be created. It would have been much easier to apply unified pressure on China and Israel to make them join the existing treaty.
     
    China was not interested 20+ years ago. The CCP liked the bilateral U.S.-Russia trap that restrained their American opposition. Breaking out of bilateral deals was the minimum first step towards multilateral treaties.

    It is unfortunate that a series of new arrangements did not happen. However, the U.S. would be in much worse shape versus the CCP if it had retained the bilateral framework of a bygone era. That would have been an open license for China to run amok.

    Israel's geopolitical strategic situation is so unique, it is hard to see what could be gained by attempting to force their inclusion. Compelling Israel to participate in talks between gigantic nations would be a clever way to scuttle negotiations, thus guaranteeing no results.

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @QCIC

    My main point is that if the USA and Russia had an ad hoc unified position on nuclear arms control together they could have politely pressured others into joining updated versions of some but probably not all treaties and agreements. This would have been a nice baby step to further multilateral nuclear arms reductions. This opportunity is long gone. At the time the USA/West was still in the process of building China up and working to push Russia down, so this sort of collaborative big picture was probably not talked about much. It does have a big risk of accelerating globalist agendas so maybe it is just as well it did not happen.

    I always mention Israel since I think they are the most likely to use nuclear weapons. I cannot make that case strongly, it is just a hunch. Pakistan and India tied for second. North Korea is the least likely, the other countries are in the middle.

    Now that we have decent evidence of a worldwide bioweapon attack the arms reduction treaties may need to change to keep up with the times.

    I take it as self-evident that China has lied about the size of her nuclear stockpile for decades.

  153. @Mr. Hack
    @QCIC


    This is about the West pressuring Russia in a way that can easily lead to nuclear war.
     
    So now its Prigozhin that's taking his marching orders from the West? Or is it Shoigu or Gerasimov?
    It's always the fault of the West and never Russia's for all of the insanity going on within Russia.

    Why not just name the culprit like Ivashka has?
    https://s3-eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/cartoons-s3/styles/product_detail_image/s3/klausschwab-pugliese.jpg?itok=7QrUBXt8
    Is Klaus Schwab at it again and making the RusFed leadership look stupid once again?

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @QCIC

    In my own tiny way I try to influence this discussion to deescalate the West to reduce the risk of nuclear war. I do this by explaining the situation from a Cold War 2.0 perspective which emphasizes real issues which are lost in the dumbed-down perspective of a manipulated blood feud between brothers. I think my outlook is valid but obviously incomplete. The big picture of the whole thing could actually be a feud between Klaus Schwab and Semion Mogilevich over some woman whose name I can’t spell much less pronounce.

    I regularly point out that the situation is driven by hidden forces in various countries. This is obvious from various things which are not explained. The dog that didn’t bark.

    The friendly Ukrainian combination of Jewish power and NeoNAZIs has always made this look like a farce. Once we have that, anything goes, since it is one of the weirdest things publicly accepted in 2023.

  154. With several factors mentioned, an interesting claim that Prigo is part of an Anglo-American Intel/Kiev regime plot to destabilize Russia.

    Primakov is twice mentioned in a snafu. Questionable Wagner and Kiev regime Artyomovsk (Bakhmut) casualties uncritically presented.

  155. AP says:
    @Ivashka the fool
    @AP


    Putin wasn’t going to save it.
     
    Have I ever written anything opposite?

    If it is to be saved, it will be saved by a renewal within Europe, that’s the only hope.
     
    There will be none. The Globalists will prevent this.

    Keep the Eurasian hordes at bay, they might be busy for awhile, if so it’s an opportunity to consolidate and strengthen the Ukrainian bulwark.
     
    Demographics are destiny. Eastern Europe is aging and dying off. Younger EE people will emigrate. Younger Central Asian people will immigrate.

    Replies: @AP

    “Putin wasn’t going to save it.”

    Have I ever written anything opposite?

    Never.

    But many deluded Westerners thought otherwise.

    “If it is to be saved, it will be saved by a renewal within Europe, that’s the only hope.”

    There will be none. The Globalists will prevent this.

    Possible but far from certain.

    Again, if European civilization is to be saved, it will be through renewal and not by Russia which has its own sort of civilizaton (and certainly not RusFed).

    And renewal will depend on Eastern Europe, a large area that is the least invaded and most traditional. The bigger this region is, the better the chances. Adding Ukraine and, God willing, Belarus, would be very helpful.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @AP


    And renewal will depend on Eastern Europe, a large area that is the least invaded and most traditional. The bigger this region is, the better the chances. Adding Ukraine and, God willing, Belarus, would be very helpful.
     
    Eastern Europe can help make Europe less Woke, but Eastern Europe's influence in European affairs is reduced by the fact that it's not a huge R & D hub or elite science production hub like Western Europe is. Western Europe is primarily the part of Europe that moves Europe forward, whether for better (R & D spending/research and elite science production) or for worse (Wokeness and mass immigration of undesirable elements).

    https://www.unz.com/akarlin/science-production/

    https://www.unz.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/map-nature-index-cities-europe-2017.png

    I think that this is what Anatoly Karlin means when he says that rightoids have less relevance than leftoids even when their numbers are comparable. It's similar for the US, where leftist areas produce most of the elite science:

    https://www.unz.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/map-nature-index-cities-north-america-2017.png

    The South, interior West, and Midwest (outside of Chicago) don't have all that much elite science production, and even the parts of them that do have a relatively large amount of it (Atlanta, Austin, Houston, Dallas, Ann Arbor, et cetera) are considerably more liberal than their US states as a whole.
  156. @AP
    @Beckow

    If Putin falls will you become Prigozhin's lackey?

    Or revert to Orban's lackey?

    You will have difficult decisions to make, Beckow. Whose boots to lick?

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Wokechoke

    which rainbow dildo is shoved up your arse though?

  157. @John Johnson
    @AP

    Too soon to say whether the Ukrainians will win or lose. How the Prigozhin affair plays can will make a big difference.

    Absolutely and especially when it comes to public opinion.

    Russian State TV has convinced the public that Bakhmut was an elaborate trap and Putin knows what he is doing. Russians are a serf like people that put their faith in the Tsar. They view it as not their place to question him.

    Well now his private warlord is threatening mutiny and Ukraine is advancing. Armored vehicles are patrolling Moscow out of fear that the Hebrew chef might come home.

    It public opinion breaks it will be a huge disaster for Russia. The gears of resistance will turn and Putin will be fighting a war of two fronts. One in Ukraine and one at home.

    Nazi Germany was difficult to defeat in part because they had the public convinced that Hitler was a genius who would always win in the end. Even as the Soviets entered Germany it was a common belief that the dictator must still have a grand plan for victory.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @Sean

    At this point the jew will have to be shot.

  158. Battle of the Nations
    Spain United States
    Australia Denmark

  159. AP says:
    @Hartnell
    @AP

    I agree with Ivashka here. The Eastern European Youth are too obsessed with democracy, freedom, individualism and in general having a good quality of life. The fate of Europe or whether the original inhabitants are replaced by the third world is not on their radar.

    To be honest, saving Europe itself will have to be on the West's initiative at this stage. The Slavs are not going to do it. Which means the Western Populists must actually start to take power and do populist things. So far, they are not but events dear boy, events.

    Replies: @AP

    The Eastern European Youth are too obsessed with democracy, freedom, individualism and in general having a good quality of life.

    Sure, they are young. But they are not Woke. They are normal.

    To be honest, saving Europe itself will have to be on the West’s initiative at this stage. The Slavs are not going to do it.

    The Slavs cannot do it alone, but their large reservoir of generally conservative people and large territories with few foreigners are probably necessary for eventual renewal. Ukraine would be almost like another Poland in terms of population. Belarus (if…) another Hungary.

    Italy seems to be the first Western country to flip. Support for traditional forces is strongest among the young there.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @AP


    The Slavs cannot do it alone, but their large reservoir of generally conservative people and large territories with few foreigners are probably necessary for eventual renewal.
     
    Are the conservative white people in the Southern and interior Western US enough for an eventual conservative renewal in the US?

    As a side note, while Poland, etc. lags behind the West in terms of liberalism, they are still advancing on this front:

    https://www.unz.com/akarlin/poland-will-legalize-gay-marriage-within-10-years/

    https://www.unz.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/poll-gay-marriage-usa-russia-poland.png

    Poles are already the most Negrophilic Eastern Europeans:

    https://www.unz.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/map-europe-poll-miscegeneration.jpg

    And I guess that it's thus no surprise that the Simon Mol story occurred there:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simon_Mol

    He knowingly infected a double-digit number of liberal Polish women with HIV by telling them that it's racist for them to ask him to wear a condom because he's black and that thus they're reinforcing negative stereotypes about blacks being STD-ridden by asking him to wear a condom, even though, unknowingly to them but knowingly to him, in his case, these stereotypes were actually true.

    That said, though, all of the crap in the West is still better than having Ukraine get conquered by the Russians. The West is still much more impressive than Russia in spite of the West's problems (and Russia has its own fair share of crap as well); the West actually moves humanity forward to an astronomically greater extent than Russia does, after all.
    , @Dmitry
    @AP


    they are young. But they are not Woke. They are normal.
     
    Eastern Europe is zone of relatively lack of culture, creativity, original and tradition, in relation to Western Europe. As result, almost everything related to culture in Eastern Europe, is imported from West or more recently also East Asia.

    There isn't a local culture production anymore and even in the 19th century the local production was dying and replaced with local versions of Western culture. But the culture you import from the developed countries still has to match to economic level, to social life, of people who will use this culture.

    Third and second world is always a kind of recycling machine for the culture of the first world. Old cars and clothes from the wealthy countries, are imported and recyled by the local people. Even Marxism could be recyled in incompetent way by the third world in the 20th century. But it has to be possible for use by the local people. You can import Toyota Landcruiser to African roads, not a Kei car.

    "Woke" is an elite ideology which is popular with wealthy Westerners who are living very socially conservative they don't like loud noises or clapping https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrVlrZX4UsI.

    For example, one of more popular youth fashion in Russia was in last decade (although less than "Kpop") was "offnik" fashion, it's the local copy of English football hooligan culture, wearing or beating people wearing "River Island" or "Burberry" cloths.

    Youth culture in Russia is created by watching English hooligan films like "The Football Factory" (2004) and trying to copy characters of England, their clothes and lifestyle.

    For the young people in Perm, it's possible to copy the characters of English working class films like "The Football Factory", where the lifestyle is a socially liberal.

    It's not possible to copy woke ideology of upper class young people of Harvard and the Dartmouth College, who are not drinking alcohol or using drugs in the weekend, who don't have relationships with women because they are studying, who don't like loud noises, who don't live with polluted industrial environment, who don't want to fight anyone etc.

    This is probably one why woke culture is difficult usually to import in Eastern Europe, except to some elite circles. It's like importing ballet from Paris to the 19th century Russian village, it would be limited only to some elite cities. Within a context of Ukraine, they can probably recycle parts of the woke culture by adding this to their nationalism importation projects.

    Like Cubans recycling parts of the different cars, in Ukraine they will say if your are Russians wearing embroidary, you are culturally appropriating the native customs of Ukraine.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Sean

  160. @John Johnson
    @AP

    Too soon to say whether the Ukrainians will win or lose. How the Prigozhin affair plays can will make a big difference.

    Absolutely and especially when it comes to public opinion.

    Russian State TV has convinced the public that Bakhmut was an elaborate trap and Putin knows what he is doing. Russians are a serf like people that put their faith in the Tsar. They view it as not their place to question him.

    Well now his private warlord is threatening mutiny and Ukraine is advancing. Armored vehicles are patrolling Moscow out of fear that the Hebrew chef might come home.

    It public opinion breaks it will be a huge disaster for Russia. The gears of resistance will turn and Putin will be fighting a war of two fronts. One in Ukraine and one at home.

    Nazi Germany was difficult to defeat in part because they had the public convinced that Hitler was a genius who would always win in the end. Even as the Soviets entered Germany it was a common belief that the dictator must still have a grand plan for victory.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @Sean

    Just as Chamberlain’s government –loath to rerun WW1– nevertheless gave a full territorial guarantee to Poland the instant the Nazi Soviet pact became known, Ukraine’s coalescing military understanding with and orientation to the West is now regarded by the Kremlin as making war necessary at whatever cost. That sudden assignment was the sort of thing Russia’s army might reasonably be expected to be ready for. However, the peacetime Russian army is kept procedurally hidebound because in peace the army’ combat effectiveness and morale being very low does not matter. For the Kremlin, the army’s status in Russian society being low is deliberate policy (fantastic as it seems Russian gangsters extort money from soldiers, including officers and even members of the nuclear forces) and this is because it has he priority of making sure the military top brass can never be a political force in their own right. Command has a way of going to a mans head and recent events involving Prigozhin show that the Kremlin’s worries about not keeping a very bureaucratic chain of command were not so paranoid.

    The quick practical methods of command based on personal loyalty to leaders that are inherent to success in actual combat confer a danger for the Kremlin inasmuch as the army leadership might have the potential for a power play. Wagner was already combat experienced and agile, so it was used in Bakhmut with new Z-convict expendables, and with regulary army fire support and shell supply achieved victory. There seems to have been an understanding between Putin and Prigozhin that he could draw attention to Wagner and contrast its achievements with the regular army; this would have given the Kremlin a useful way to goad the regular army to greater efforts. With the balance of his mind disturbed, Prigozhin wrongly thought he had carte blanch for any action against the army brass hats, no matter how egregious.

    Prigozhin completely lacks an independent power base, so nothing could come of him using the relatively tiny Wagner to stage a genuine revolt against the huge Russian army , still less the Kremlin that ultimately controls the army, but his own death along with any who followed him’ He made his money in casinos (a licence to print money) and is smart but not terribly level headed in view of his failure at youthful petty criminality , and he did spend time at the sharp end in Bakhmut, maybe too much because certain of his appearances–as with the ones that showed him raging at the army behind a pile of his own men’s corpses–may indicate a touch of traumatic stress disorder. May he be have been resorting to drugs to unwind? The idea that Sergei Shoigu is a mastermind who pulled the strings of Putin and got into a war with Ukraine so Shoigu could be promoted, as alleged by Prigozhin, is risible; is accusations are a symptom of him losing his mind. He is about to find himself back in prison. Wagner is not longer required because the regulars have their own Zpenal battalions now. Wagner personnel had to sign contrast with the regular army by July, he thought his position of independent control was disappearing so he started echoing Western commentators about the origin and course of the conflict; he said the Ukraine were about to take a strategic town they are nowhere near and not even advancing towards.

    At the end of the day ordinary Russians entering the army are convinced that they are fighting Nato, and this is a battle for the survival of the thousand year existence of the Russian state, seen as the only thing safeguarding the existence of the Russian people. Ukraine’s cross border raid into Russia proper may have been intended to distract from the loss of Bakhmut, but made it look like Ukraine was Nazi: hunting ordinary Russians just for being Russia. This was a gift to Putin. Prigozhin’s escapade may be a PR triumph for Ukraine in the West and damage his standing among Chinese, Indian and Iranian elites but in Russia it will play to increasing Putin’s authority. Something very unpleasant will happen to Zelensky the instant Putin is assassinated. There are standing instructions in the Kremlin to that effect–rely on it.

    Only the Russian army counts now and Putin has given them what they want at the cost of increasing their status to Great Patriotic War rather than SMO levels. It is like WW2 where Soviet generals tortured into confessing and convicted of spying were released from the Gulag and reinstated at their previous rank to do their jobs. A few years later the Austrian whose name is better left unmentioned was telling his staff the have faith and remember the deliverance of Fredrick’s Prussia. To which they later scoffed “Which Tsarina is going to die this time?” Zelensky is going to be increasingly be predicting another but successful coup as deus ex machina for an inexorably deteriorating military situation against the behemoth Russia army becomes ever clearer, and the limit on how far America will go stops at direct involvement–the only thing that can ultimately defeat or hold back the Russian army.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @Sean


    Just as Chamberlain’s government –loath to rerun WW1– nevertheless gave a full territorial guarantee to Poland the instant the Nazi Soviet pact became known,
     
    The British guarantee to Poland actually preceded the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact by several months, IIRC. And the British guarantee to Poland was received extremely negatively by Hitler and made Hitler more likely to attack Poland, with Hitler quickly repudiating the 1934 German-Polish Non-Aggression Pact afterwards.

    Replies: @Sean

  161. A123 says: • Website

    And… It’s Over (1)

    Prigozhin Agrees To Halt Wagner Advance, Start De-Escalation, After Lukashenko’s Mediation

    Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko announced on Saturday that he had arranged a deal whereby Wagner Group leader Evgeny Prigozhin will abandon his mutiny in exchange for “security guarantees” for his fighters.

    “Evgeny Prigozhin accepted the proposal of President Alexander Lukashenko to stop the movement of armed men of Wagner in Russia and take further steps to de-escalate tension,” read a statement from Lukashenko’s office.

    The whole situation is bizarre. However, the quick conclusion should move attention back to Russia’s highly successful defense against Kiev aggression.

    PEACE 😇
    __________

    (1) https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/putin-blasts-wagner-treason-betrayal-clashes-erupt-southern-russia

  162. @Hartnell
    @Greasy William

    Maybe it is what the people in these countries want to become? Liberal and woke? Maybe it doesn't bother them at all about becoming a minority. Maybe it is all about democracy and having a good life they are interested in?

    Of course looking at the West, immigration is ruining the good quality of life but the Slavs, rather then fighting to resist it, seem to be fighting to join it which means maybe they really don't care.

    Replies: @Greasy William

    Of course they want it. If you give people freedom to choose, they will always choose LGBT and mass immigration. But that does not mean that we should allow LGBT and mass immigration, rather it means that we should reject democracy.

    • Agree: Ivashka the fool
    • Disagree: LondonBob
  163. AP says:
    @Ivashka the fool
    @AP

    The GRU general Alekseyev, responsible for the military interactions with the PMCs have been seen on video, discussing in Rostov with Prigozhin and telling him: "You need Shoigu? Go and take him" (Вам нужен Шойгу ? Берите на здоровье). The Russian nationalists fighting on Ukrainian side have expressed their support for Wagnerite uprising. Thousands of troops are supposedly moving from DNR into RusFed. Time of Troubles 2.0. Sobyanin has declared Monday a non-working day in Moscow. Private businesses jets are flying off Moscow airports going leaving to Dubai.

    Replies: @AP

    Note that when Ukraine was attacked, most Ukrainians stayed. My cousin, a successful businessman, cut short a ski holiday in the European Alps, dropped his wife and kids off in Poland, and rushed back to Lviv when Ukraine was attacked (he signed up for territorial defense but wasn’t sent to war in the East, I guess his group was held back in case Belarus would attack from the north).

    But RusFed flees. Their lackey Beckow would do the same, he was predicting that Ukrainian would all escape, the army would dissolve and flee. surrender, etc. Based on what he would certainly have done.

    Ukrainians are telling Russians to go home and sort out their country. Hopefully it won’t be too bloody, but will take a long time, so that by the time Russia is in a position to threaten somebody again Ukraine will be too integrated with the West, and too powerful, to be worth the trouble. When I pray for peace and victory, I do not pray for maximum death and destruction upon the Russian soldiers, but that they simply leave Ukraine.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @AP


    I do not pray for maximum death and destruction upon the Russian soldiers,
     
    What if more Russian suffering this time around will reduce the risk of Russia attacking Ukraine again in the future?

    If it makes no difference, though (for instance, due to Ukraine joining NATO by then), then I agree that one should not root for this. But if it does make a difference, then it's a different story, no? Germany suffered more in WWII relative to WWI but was also much more docile after the end of WWII than after the end of WWI, especially when looking at the long-run. Had Germany been able to maintain discipline in its military and home front and WWI continued into 1919, with Germany proper going down and getting destroyed in a rain of apocalyptic fire similar to 1944-1945, but 25 years earlier than in real life, then Germany might have been more reluctant to start a second World War 20 years later, even under Hitler, who might have very well been more likely to face an anti-Nazi internal coup at the start of WWII in such a scenario.

  164. worst coup ever

    • Agree: Ivashka the fool
    • Replies: @A123
    @Greasy William

    There must have been a piece we did not see:

    • Failed assassination attempt
    • Expectation that significant military units would join in

    The coup attempt has flopped harder than the Kiev offensive.

    PEACE 😇

  165. ⚡️ Message from the press service of the President of the Republic of Belarus.

    This morning, Russian President Vladimir Putin briefed his Belarusian counterpart on the situation in southern Russia with the private military company Wagner. The heads of state agreed on joint actions.
    As a follow-up to the agreements, the President of Belarus, having additionally specified the situation through his own channels, and in agreement with the President of Russia, held talks with the head of PMC Wagner Yevgeny Prigozhin.
    Negotiations continued throughout the day. As a result, they came to agreements on the inadmissibility of unleashing a bloody massacre on the territory of Russia. Yevgeny Prigozhin accepted the proposal of the President of Belarus Alexander Lukashenko to stop the movement of armed persons of the Wagner company on the territory of Russia and take further steps to de-escalate tensions.
    At the moment, an absolutely profitable and acceptable option for solving the situation is on the table, with security guarantees for the Wagner PMC fighters.
    As previously reported, also during today, the President of Belarus held two meetings with the power bloc of the country on this situation.

    All hail Bat’ka Lukashenka !

    President of the United State of Russia and Belarus in 2024 ?

    (Just kidding, although who knows these days).

    • Replies: @Yahya
    @Ivashka the fool

    Prigozhin would be suicidal to agree to a truce/withdrawal.

    He needs to finish the task, or he is finished.

    Putin & co will slowly strangle his organization by depriving them of resources and recruitment.

    You can’t walk back a coup attempt and expect everything to continue as normal.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @24th Alabama, @Wokechoke

  166. @Greasy William
    worst coup ever

    Replies: @A123

    There must have been a piece we did not see:

    • Failed assassination attempt
    • Expectation that significant military units would join in

    The coup attempt has flopped harder than the Kiev offensive.

    PEACE 😇

  167. @AP
    @Beckow

    The most likely result of the war was going to be a draw, with the strong possibility of Ukraine taking back the Crimean corridor. Russian infighting just weakens Russia's chances, either way some Russian forces are lost through internal battles. The more, the better for Ukraine. Russia's government has already lost several helicopters and fuel storage facilities within Russia, some Wagnerites have been bombed by the Russian government. Russians positions in Ukraine are being lost. Good thing Ukraine waited with its offensive, better to start against a weakened enemy (unless Russian forces leave without a fight, not impossible). If Wagner is crushed, Russia lost some of it's better forces for the future battles.

    So whose ass you gonna lick if Putin falls? Prigozhin, Orban, Kadyrov? Genuinely curious.

    Replies: @Beckow

    For the guy like you who has been licking like mad everyone from the Banderites to the long-gone Habsburgs, you should stay away from that term, it makes you look even more weird and ridiculous.

    The most likely result of the war was going to be a draw, with the strong possibility of Ukraine taking back the Crimean corridor.

    A draw is defined as neither side gaining anything. So far Russia has gained: Crimea: most of Donbas, the Azov Sea corridor. Plus it has blocked (for now) Ukraine in Nato and seriously weakened Ukraine internally – millions left (permanently), infrastructure and economy destroyed.

    The West has gained Finland in Nato – wow! as if Finland was previously not a de facto Western outpost, weakened Russia internationally, and a hope that Ukies will keep on dying for Nato, since Natoids are clearly unwilling to do it.

    Ukraine has gained Western sympathy and…actually what else? maybe I am missing something, but what else other than future hopes has Kiev gained? Why don’t you tell us.

    Based on the above Russia is winning over Ukraine, and the West is in a draw with Russia. Get the narrative straight and stop mixing up what you are hoping will happen with what has actually happened o far.

    • Replies: @AP
    @Beckow


    For the guy like you who has been licking like mad everyone from the Banderites to the long-gone Habsburgs
     
    The lackey can only understand anyone's relationships with anything as being a necessarily subservient one. That's all you know.

    A draw is defined as neither side gaining anything. So far Russia has gained: Crimea: most of Donbas, the Azov Sea corridor.
     
    Russia has already had Crimea and most of Donbas.

    It gained the Crimean corridor.

    Ukraine has gained a massive amount of Western weapons, and has gotten closer to EU and NATO.

    If Russia keeps some of the Crimean corridor, but Ukraine gets into EU and/or NATO and gets massive reconstruction aid, it is a draw. If Russia loses the corridor, it's a Ukrainian win.

    Whose boots will you be licking Beckow? Looks like Putin will stay, but he is weakened. Lukashenko? I forgot about him.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Beckow

    , @Greasy William
    @Beckow

    Assuming the current lines mostly hold, Ukraine will have gained true independence from Russia, which it absolutely did not have before the SMO. Ukraine also now has a much greater degree of internal cohesion than it did prior to the war. And now that Ukraine is truly free from Russia and severe internal division, it will finally be able to begin developing civic institutions and reducing corruption.

    Russia, otoh, has lost all of its influence in Ukraine, making this war the biggest foreign policy disaster in Russian history.

    Ukraine lost territory and lives, but gained its freedom. Russia lost all its influence in its most important neighbor but gained new territories along with increased regime strength and stability, self confidence and international respect. The US lost a great deal of its own international prestige but prevented Ukraine from being erased from the map.

    That's about as draw-ish as it gets.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Beckow

  168. @Ivashka the fool

    ⚡️ Message from the press service of the President of the Republic of Belarus.

    This morning, Russian President Vladimir Putin briefed his Belarusian counterpart on the situation in southern Russia with the private military company Wagner. The heads of state agreed on joint actions.
    As a follow-up to the agreements, the President of Belarus, having additionally specified the situation through his own channels, and in agreement with the President of Russia, held talks with the head of PMC Wagner Yevgeny Prigozhin.
    Negotiations continued throughout the day. As a result, they came to agreements on the inadmissibility of unleashing a bloody massacre on the territory of Russia. Yevgeny Prigozhin accepted the proposal of the President of Belarus Alexander Lukashenko to stop the movement of armed persons of the Wagner company on the territory of Russia and take further steps to de-escalate tensions.
    At the moment, an absolutely profitable and acceptable option for solving the situation is on the table, with security guarantees for the Wagner PMC fighters.
    As previously reported, also during today, the President of Belarus held two meetings with the power bloc of the country on this situation.
     

    All hail Bat'ka Lukashenka !

    President of the United State of Russia and Belarus in 2024 ?

    (Just kidding, although who knows these days).

    Replies: @Yahya

    Prigozhin would be suicidal to agree to a truce/withdrawal.

    He needs to finish the task, or he is finished.

    Putin & co will slowly strangle his organization by depriving them of resources and recruitment.

    You can’t walk back a coup attempt and expect everything to continue as normal.

    • LOL: LondonBob
    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @Yahya

    I completely agree.

    I am pretty sure Prigozhin understands this too.

    We'll see.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

    , @24th Alabama
    @Yahya

    "If you strike at a king, you must kill him."
    Ralph Waldo Emerson

    Prigozhin is done, unless Putin promised him
    his life in exchange for standing down.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

    , @Wokechoke
    @Yahya

    He’s a Jew. He’s been promoted by the likes of the BBC and CNN or our own JJ and been found out. Banishing a Jew to the Pale is pretty good Kek.

    Replies: @Matra

  169. @Ivashka the fool
    @Mr. XYZ

    See my reply to suddent death above. As I expected, it is Time of Troubles in Russia again. Now, if Russia becomes the North Eurasian Somalia with whatever is really left of Soviet nuclear weapons stockpile, is that better for any of its neighbors? If RusFed is not there anymore to absorb the excess population of the Central Asian Stans, where will they go ? Will it be as in an old Soviet joke: "Polish radio happily reported that everything is peaceful on the China's border with Finland" ? All this situation should have been avoided...

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    If RusFed is not there anymore to absorb the excess population of the Central Asian Stans, where will they go ?

    China?

  170. @Yahya
    @Ivashka the fool

    Prigozhin would be suicidal to agree to a truce/withdrawal.

    He needs to finish the task, or he is finished.

    Putin & co will slowly strangle his organization by depriving them of resources and recruitment.

    You can’t walk back a coup attempt and expect everything to continue as normal.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @24th Alabama, @Wokechoke

    I completely agree.

    I am pretty sure Prigozhin understands this too.

    We’ll see.

    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @Ivashka the fool

    Unless I misunderstand you, the information that you present in comment #167 that appeals to you clearly shows that Prigozhin is indeed ready to negotiate an end to hostilities. Yet you agree with Yahya that Prigozhin would be suicidal to agree to any sort of truce/withdrawal??

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/content/dam/news/2023/06/24/TELEMMGLPICT000340508436_16876269101710_trans_NvBQzQNjv4Bqz8PrEBUoq2NOeDT9dFlgSyDBQNy5F1lNIrn6Q9TU920.jpeg

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Wokechoke

  171. @AP
    @Ivashka the fool

    Note that when Ukraine was attacked, most Ukrainians stayed. My cousin, a successful businessman, cut short a ski holiday in the European Alps, dropped his wife and kids off in Poland, and rushed back to Lviv when Ukraine was attacked (he signed up for territorial defense but wasn't sent to war in the East, I guess his group was held back in case Belarus would attack from the north).

    But RusFed flees. Their lackey Beckow would do the same, he was predicting that Ukrainian would all escape, the army would dissolve and flee. surrender, etc. Based on what he would certainly have done.

    Ukrainians are telling Russians to go home and sort out their country. Hopefully it won't be too bloody, but will take a long time, so that by the time Russia is in a position to threaten somebody again Ukraine will be too integrated with the West, and too powerful, to be worth the trouble. When I pray for peace and victory, I do not pray for maximum death and destruction upon the Russian soldiers, but that they simply leave Ukraine.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    I do not pray for maximum death and destruction upon the Russian soldiers,

    What if more Russian suffering this time around will reduce the risk of Russia attacking Ukraine again in the future?

    If it makes no difference, though (for instance, due to Ukraine joining NATO by then), then I agree that one should not root for this. But if it does make a difference, then it’s a different story, no? Germany suffered more in WWII relative to WWI but was also much more docile after the end of WWII than after the end of WWI, especially when looking at the long-run. Had Germany been able to maintain discipline in its military and home front and WWI continued into 1919, with Germany proper going down and getting destroyed in a rain of apocalyptic fire similar to 1944-1945, but 25 years earlier than in real life, then Germany might have been more reluctant to start a second World War 20 years later, even under Hitler, who might have very well been more likely to face an anti-Nazi internal coup at the start of WWII in such a scenario.

  172. @AP
    @Hartnell


    The Eastern European Youth are too obsessed with democracy, freedom, individualism and in general having a good quality of life.
     
    Sure, they are young. But they are not Woke. They are normal.

    To be honest, saving Europe itself will have to be on the West’s initiative at this stage. The Slavs are not going to do it.
     
    The Slavs cannot do it alone, but their large reservoir of generally conservative people and large territories with few foreigners are probably necessary for eventual renewal. Ukraine would be almost like another Poland in terms of population. Belarus (if...) another Hungary.

    Italy seems to be the first Western country to flip. Support for traditional forces is strongest among the young there.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Dmitry

    The Slavs cannot do it alone, but their large reservoir of generally conservative people and large territories with few foreigners are probably necessary for eventual renewal.

    Are the conservative white people in the Southern and interior Western US enough for an eventual conservative renewal in the US?

    As a side note, while Poland, etc. lags behind the West in terms of liberalism, they are still advancing on this front:

    https://www.unz.com/akarlin/poland-will-legalize-gay-marriage-within-10-years/

    Poles are already the most Negrophilic Eastern Europeans:

    And I guess that it’s thus no surprise that the Simon Mol story occurred there:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simon_Mol

    He knowingly infected a double-digit number of liberal Polish women with HIV by telling them that it’s racist for them to ask him to wear a condom because he’s black and that thus they’re reinforcing negative stereotypes about blacks being STD-ridden by asking him to wear a condom, even though, unknowingly to them but knowingly to him, in his case, these stereotypes were actually true.

    That said, though, all of the crap in the West is still better than having Ukraine get conquered by the Russians. The West is still much more impressive than Russia in spite of the West’s problems (and Russia has its own fair share of crap as well); the West actually moves humanity forward to an astronomically greater extent than Russia does, after all.

  173. AP says:
    @Beckow
    @AP

    For the guy like you who has been licking like mad everyone from the Banderites to the long-gone Habsburgs, you should stay away from that term, it makes you look even more weird and ridiculous.


    The most likely result of the war was going to be a draw, with the strong possibility of Ukraine taking back the Crimean corridor.
     
    A draw is defined as neither side gaining anything. So far Russia has gained: Crimea: most of Donbas, the Azov Sea corridor. Plus it has blocked (for now) Ukraine in Nato and seriously weakened Ukraine internally - millions left (permanently), infrastructure and economy destroyed.

    The West has gained Finland in Nato - wow! as if Finland was previously not a de facto Western outpost, weakened Russia internationally, and a hope that Ukies will keep on dying for Nato, since Natoids are clearly unwilling to do it.

    Ukraine has gained Western sympathy and...actually what else? maybe I am missing something, but what else other than future hopes has Kiev gained? Why don't you tell us.

    Based on the above Russia is winning over Ukraine, and the West is in a draw with Russia. Get the narrative straight and stop mixing up what you are hoping will happen with what has actually happened o far.

    Replies: @AP, @Greasy William

    For the guy like you who has been licking like mad everyone from the Banderites to the long-gone Habsburgs

    The lackey can only understand anyone’s relationships with anything as being a necessarily subservient one. That’s all you know.

    A draw is defined as neither side gaining anything. So far Russia has gained: Crimea: most of Donbas, the Azov Sea corridor.

    Russia has already had Crimea and most of Donbas.

    It gained the Crimean corridor.

    Ukraine has gained a massive amount of Western weapons, and has gotten closer to EU and NATO.

    If Russia keeps some of the Crimean corridor, but Ukraine gets into EU and/or NATO and gets massive reconstruction aid, it is a draw. If Russia loses the corridor, it’s a Ukrainian win.

    Whose boots will you be licking Beckow? Looks like Putin will stay, but he is weakened. Lukashenko? I forgot about him.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @AP


    If Russia keeps some of the Crimean corridor, but Ukraine gets into EU and/or NATO and gets massive reconstruction aid, it is a draw. If Russia loses the corridor, it’s a Ukrainian win.

     

    Would Ukraine actually be willing to accept a (Crimea + Donbass) for NATO deal? I mean, an awful lot of their blood has already been shed in this war. It arguably makes sense for them to accept, but again, anti-Russian feelings are probably extraordinarily high in Ukraine right now--certainly considerably higher than they were back in January 2022.

    If Russia goes get to keep Crimea and Donbass, though, then it should certainly pay very generous reparations to Ukraine. I mean on top of having its seized asserts being used for Ukraine's reconstruction. (Really is uplifting, when you think about it: Russian oligarchs often acquired their money in shady ways and now a sizable part of their money is finally actually going to be used for a noble purpose.)

    Replies: @Beckow, @John Johnson

    , @Beckow
    @AP


    ...Russia has already had Crimea and most of Donbas.
     
    Everyone understood that once Kiev and its sponsors rejected Minsk there will have to be a war - so you pretending that the situation after 2014 was stable is quite stupid. Only with the war it looks like Russia has both Crimea and Donbas. Russia has also added substantial parts of Donbas, like Mariupol, etc...

    Ukraine has gained a massive amount of Western weapons, and has gotten closer to EU and NATO.
     
    So you could not come up with any actual gains by Ukraine. The weapons are being used up and lost and they are of no value in peace - which you don't seem to want. And "getting closer"? What the hell does that even mean? Kiev was so close to EU-Nato before 2022 that they put it in their Constitution. Membership in EU or Nato would be something, but getting close only sounds desperate. So no tangible benefits from the war for Ukraine, but some very high costs.

    If Russia keeps some of the Crimean corridor, but Ukraine gets into EU and/or NATO and gets massive reconstruction aid, it is a draw. If Russia loses the corridor, it’s a Ukrainian win.
     
    That means that if Russia keeps the corridor and Ukraine is not in Nato, it is a Russian win. EU is not the same, Russia never objected to it - they simply wanted the free-trade zone to be negotiated with them. If Kiev stops trading with Russia it will not be necessary.

    If the war ends with Russia keeping Crimea-Donbass-Azov corridor it would be a clear win. And a much worse result for Kiev than taking the Minsk deal.

    (About the "licking" part, get a hold of yourself and go to see a psychiatrist. You are making a fool out of yourself.)

    Replies: @AP

  174. @Ivashka the fool
    @Yahya

    I completely agree.

    I am pretty sure Prigozhin understands this too.

    We'll see.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

    Unless I misunderstand you, the information that you present in comment #167 that appeals to you clearly shows that Prigozhin is indeed ready to negotiate an end to hostilities. Yet you agree with Yahya that Prigozhin would be suicidal to agree to any sort of truce/withdrawal??

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @Mr. Hack

    That's why we'll see tomorrow.

    Although, Russians are already joking that "Putin has joined the Wagnerite mutiny".

    BTW, I am sorry to note that your cartoon is Antisemitic Mr Hack. Drawing Prigozhin as a rabid dog is a hate crime against a Jewish individual.

    🙂

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

    , @Wokechoke
    @Mr. Hack

    Russian banishes the evil Jew to the Pripet Marshes. Awesome.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

  175. @Mr. Hack
    @Ivashka the fool

    Unless I misunderstand you, the information that you present in comment #167 that appeals to you clearly shows that Prigozhin is indeed ready to negotiate an end to hostilities. Yet you agree with Yahya that Prigozhin would be suicidal to agree to any sort of truce/withdrawal??

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/content/dam/news/2023/06/24/TELEMMGLPICT000340508436_16876269101710_trans_NvBQzQNjv4Bqz8PrEBUoq2NOeDT9dFlgSyDBQNy5F1lNIrn6Q9TU920.jpeg

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Wokechoke

    That’s why we’ll see tomorrow.

    Although, Russians are already joking that “Putin has joined the Wagnerite mutiny”.

    BTW, I am sorry to note that your cartoon is Antisemitic Mr Hack. Drawing Prigozhin as a rabid dog is a hate crime against a Jewish individual.

    🙂

    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @Ivashka the fool

    Perhaps, but I have it on good authority that the steak that Putler has thrown to Prigozhin has undergone all of the strict dietary laws leading to the pure state of being known as kosher. :-)

  176. @AP
    @Ivashka the fool


    "Putin wasn’t going to save it."

    Have I ever written anything opposite?
     
    Never.

    But many deluded Westerners thought otherwise.

    "If it is to be saved, it will be saved by a renewal within Europe, that’s the only hope."

    There will be none. The Globalists will prevent this.
     
    Possible but far from certain.

    Again, if European civilization is to be saved, it will be through renewal and not by Russia which has its own sort of civilizaton (and certainly not RusFed).

    And renewal will depend on Eastern Europe, a large area that is the least invaded and most traditional. The bigger this region is, the better the chances. Adding Ukraine and, God willing, Belarus, would be very helpful.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    And renewal will depend on Eastern Europe, a large area that is the least invaded and most traditional. The bigger this region is, the better the chances. Adding Ukraine and, God willing, Belarus, would be very helpful.

    Eastern Europe can help make Europe less Woke, but Eastern Europe’s influence in European affairs is reduced by the fact that it’s not a huge R & D hub or elite science production hub like Western Europe is. Western Europe is primarily the part of Europe that moves Europe forward, whether for better (R & D spending/research and elite science production) or for worse (Wokeness and mass immigration of undesirable elements).

    https://www.unz.com/akarlin/science-production/

    I think that this is what Anatoly Karlin means when he says that rightoids have less relevance than leftoids even when their numbers are comparable. It’s similar for the US, where leftist areas produce most of the elite science:

    The South, interior West, and Midwest (outside of Chicago) don’t have all that much elite science production, and even the parts of them that do have a relatively large amount of it (Atlanta, Austin, Houston, Dallas, Ann Arbor, et cetera) are considerably more liberal than their US states as a whole.

  177. @Beckow
    @AP

    For the guy like you who has been licking like mad everyone from the Banderites to the long-gone Habsburgs, you should stay away from that term, it makes you look even more weird and ridiculous.


    The most likely result of the war was going to be a draw, with the strong possibility of Ukraine taking back the Crimean corridor.
     
    A draw is defined as neither side gaining anything. So far Russia has gained: Crimea: most of Donbas, the Azov Sea corridor. Plus it has blocked (for now) Ukraine in Nato and seriously weakened Ukraine internally - millions left (permanently), infrastructure and economy destroyed.

    The West has gained Finland in Nato - wow! as if Finland was previously not a de facto Western outpost, weakened Russia internationally, and a hope that Ukies will keep on dying for Nato, since Natoids are clearly unwilling to do it.

    Ukraine has gained Western sympathy and...actually what else? maybe I am missing something, but what else other than future hopes has Kiev gained? Why don't you tell us.

    Based on the above Russia is winning over Ukraine, and the West is in a draw with Russia. Get the narrative straight and stop mixing up what you are hoping will happen with what has actually happened o far.

    Replies: @AP, @Greasy William

    Assuming the current lines mostly hold, Ukraine will have gained true independence from Russia, which it absolutely did not have before the SMO. Ukraine also now has a much greater degree of internal cohesion than it did prior to the war. And now that Ukraine is truly free from Russia and severe internal division, it will finally be able to begin developing civic institutions and reducing corruption.

    Russia, otoh, has lost all of its influence in Ukraine, making this war the biggest foreign policy disaster in Russian history.

    Ukraine lost territory and lives, but gained its freedom. Russia lost all its influence in its most important neighbor but gained new territories along with increased regime strength and stability, self confidence and international respect. The US lost a great deal of its own international prestige but prevented Ukraine from being erased from the map.

    That’s about as draw-ish as it gets.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @Greasy William


    The US lost a great deal of its own international prestige but prevented Ukraine from being erased from the map.
     
    The US also gained a larger West and a larger EU in the long-run.

    Poland is a huge winner by allowing Intermarium to be created within the EU.
    , @Beckow
    @Greasy William

    To summarize your win-loss argument: Ukraine won intangibles like "freedom" but lost territory, men and resources. Russia won materially, but the loser (Ukraine) now hates them even more.

    Isn't that how most wars end? The winner gets real stuff, but is hated by the losing side who goes on and on about how the fact that they are not dead means that now they are "free". Freedom with less territory and more poverty, with millions who left and infrastructure destroyed. But they will blabber about 'freedom' although in reality nothing in that respect has changed between 2021 and now.

    I also don't understand your point about Ukraine not having "real independence" after Maidan. How could that be? They had about as hostile relations with Russia as is humanly possible, they banned everything from trade to Russian books and statues.

    What was that all about if they were according to you still not truly independent of Russia? When you write absurd stuff like that you frankly sound like a not very smart propagandist. Or maybe just not very smart.

    Replies: @Greasy William, @silviosilver

  178. I think this whole Wagner coup is even funnier than the forty mile truck traffic jam west of Kiev.

    Some people have been made to look very stupid. Good propaganda plays on the prejudices and ignorance of the target audience.

    • Agree: Greasy William
    • Replies: @Greasy William
    @LondonBob

    It was bizarre that the NAFO shills weren't just hopeful, they actually were certain that Putin had been overthrown and that Ukraine had won the war. These people live in a complete dream world

    , @Wokechoke
    @LondonBob

    I’d still shoot Prigozhin. Big mouthed Jews shouldn’t be left alive.

  179. @AP
    @Beckow


    For the guy like you who has been licking like mad everyone from the Banderites to the long-gone Habsburgs
     
    The lackey can only understand anyone's relationships with anything as being a necessarily subservient one. That's all you know.

    A draw is defined as neither side gaining anything. So far Russia has gained: Crimea: most of Donbas, the Azov Sea corridor.
     
    Russia has already had Crimea and most of Donbas.

    It gained the Crimean corridor.

    Ukraine has gained a massive amount of Western weapons, and has gotten closer to EU and NATO.

    If Russia keeps some of the Crimean corridor, but Ukraine gets into EU and/or NATO and gets massive reconstruction aid, it is a draw. If Russia loses the corridor, it's a Ukrainian win.

    Whose boots will you be licking Beckow? Looks like Putin will stay, but he is weakened. Lukashenko? I forgot about him.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Beckow

    If Russia keeps some of the Crimean corridor, but Ukraine gets into EU and/or NATO and gets massive reconstruction aid, it is a draw. If Russia loses the corridor, it’s a Ukrainian win.

    Would Ukraine actually be willing to accept a (Crimea + Donbass) for NATO deal? I mean, an awful lot of their blood has already been shed in this war. It arguably makes sense for them to accept, but again, anti-Russian feelings are probably extraordinarily high in Ukraine right now–certainly considerably higher than they were back in January 2022.

    If Russia goes get to keep Crimea and Donbass, though, then it should certainly pay very generous reparations to Ukraine. I mean on top of having its seized asserts being used for Ukraine’s reconstruction. (Really is uplifting, when you think about it: Russian oligarchs often acquired their money in shady ways and now a sizable part of their money is finally actually going to be used for a noble purpose.)

    • Replies: @Beckow
    @Mr. XYZ


    ...Would Ukraine actually be willing to accept a (Crimea + Donbass) for NATO deal?
     
    Unless Russia completely loses the war that deal won't be offered. Regarding whether Ukies would ever accept it: you can find hundreds of cases of border disputes where the losing side has never accepted it: Cyprus and Greece, Kashmir, Palestine, even Western Poland or pre-Trianon Hungary. What difference does that make?

    But a more interesting point is what would Kiev do with Crimea and Donbas if it would by some miracle get them back. 5-7 million Russians would be expelled? Murdered? Kiev would apply its policy of banning the Russian language and schools in areas that are 80-90% Russian, can you even imagine that?

    Would they put a Bandera statue in Sevastopol or Donetsk? You should think these things through because having irrational dreams with a touch of genocide is no way to win wars. Or friends.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    , @John Johnson
    @Mr. XYZ

    If Russia goes get to keep Crimea and Donbass, though, then it should certainly pay very generous reparations to Ukraine.

    That has huge problems because of the coal basin and nuke plants. The separatists were in part motivated by money because they planned on becoming independent republics with the intent of selling the coal to Russia.

    Russia wouldn't be able to write a check that covers the Donbas resources in addition to reparations for the war.

    It's more than land which makes a deal all the more difficult.

    Swiss neutrality with Crimean independence would be a better compromise. That would of course require UN monitoring of elections so Russia can't put in a puppet government.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

  180. @Greasy William
    @Beckow

    Assuming the current lines mostly hold, Ukraine will have gained true independence from Russia, which it absolutely did not have before the SMO. Ukraine also now has a much greater degree of internal cohesion than it did prior to the war. And now that Ukraine is truly free from Russia and severe internal division, it will finally be able to begin developing civic institutions and reducing corruption.

    Russia, otoh, has lost all of its influence in Ukraine, making this war the biggest foreign policy disaster in Russian history.

    Ukraine lost territory and lives, but gained its freedom. Russia lost all its influence in its most important neighbor but gained new territories along with increased regime strength and stability, self confidence and international respect. The US lost a great deal of its own international prestige but prevented Ukraine from being erased from the map.

    That's about as draw-ish as it gets.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Beckow

    The US lost a great deal of its own international prestige but prevented Ukraine from being erased from the map.

    The US also gained a larger West and a larger EU in the long-run.

    Poland is a huge winner by allowing Intermarium to be created within the EU.

  181. @AP
    @Beckow


    For the guy like you who has been licking like mad everyone from the Banderites to the long-gone Habsburgs
     
    The lackey can only understand anyone's relationships with anything as being a necessarily subservient one. That's all you know.

    A draw is defined as neither side gaining anything. So far Russia has gained: Crimea: most of Donbas, the Azov Sea corridor.
     
    Russia has already had Crimea and most of Donbas.

    It gained the Crimean corridor.

    Ukraine has gained a massive amount of Western weapons, and has gotten closer to EU and NATO.

    If Russia keeps some of the Crimean corridor, but Ukraine gets into EU and/or NATO and gets massive reconstruction aid, it is a draw. If Russia loses the corridor, it's a Ukrainian win.

    Whose boots will you be licking Beckow? Looks like Putin will stay, but he is weakened. Lukashenko? I forgot about him.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Beckow

    …Russia has already had Crimea and most of Donbas.

    Everyone understood that once Kiev and its sponsors rejected Minsk there will have to be a war – so you pretending that the situation after 2014 was stable is quite stupid. Only with the war it looks like Russia has both Crimea and Donbas. Russia has also added substantial parts of Donbas, like Mariupol, etc…

    Ukraine has gained a massive amount of Western weapons, and has gotten closer to EU and NATO.

    So you could not come up with any actual gains by Ukraine. The weapons are being used up and lost and they are of no value in peace – which you don’t seem to want. And “getting closer“? What the hell does that even mean? Kiev was so close to EU-Nato before 2022 that they put it in their Constitution. Membership in EU or Nato would be something, but getting close only sounds desperate. So no tangible benefits from the war for Ukraine, but some very high costs.

    If Russia keeps some of the Crimean corridor, but Ukraine gets into EU and/or NATO and gets massive reconstruction aid, it is a draw. If Russia loses the corridor, it’s a Ukrainian win.

    That means that if Russia keeps the corridor and Ukraine is not in Nato, it is a Russian win. EU is not the same, Russia never objected to it – they simply wanted the free-trade zone to be negotiated with them. If Kiev stops trading with Russia it will not be necessary.

    If the war ends with Russia keeping Crimea-Donbass-Azov corridor it would be a clear win. And a much worse result for Kiev than taking the Minsk deal.

    (About the “licking” part, get a hold of yourself and go to see a psychiatrist. You are making a fool out of yourself.)

    • Replies: @AP
    @Beckow


    Everyone understood that once Kiev and its sponsors rejected Minsk there will have to be a war
     
    Good that you acknowledge that Russia would go to war if Ukraine wanted to be fully independent. Minsk demanded that Ukraine cede some sovereignty to Russia.

    so you pretending that the situation after 2014 was stable
     
    It was as stable as Russia wanted it to be. Apparently Russia did not want stability.

    "Ukraine has gained a massive amount of Western weapons, and has gotten closer to EU and NATO."

    So you could not come up with any actual gains by Ukraine. The weapons are being used up and lost and they are of no value in peace
     
    They are being used and replenished.

    Are you too stupid to understand that weapons are an excellent deterrent in peace?

    And “getting closer“? What the hell does that even mean? Kiev was so close to EU-Nato before 2022 that they put it in their Constitution.
     
    Both NATO and EU have made more serious overtures to Ukraine than before. So membership in both organizations is more likely than in 2014-2021.

    Ukraine is also more cohesive (wars have that effect) and Russian influence largely purged. Voluntarily.

    So no tangible benefits from the war for Ukraine, but some very high costs.
     
    Well, lots of modern weapons are tangible. Cohesion, freedom from Russia, etc. are intangible but very important.

    If Russia keeps some of the Crimean corridor, but Ukraine gets into EU and/or NATO and gets massive reconstruction aid, it is a draw. If Russia loses the corridor, it’s a Ukrainian win.

    That means that if Russia keeps the corridor and Ukraine is not in Nato
     
    I wrote NATO and/or EU. If Ukraine is armed to the teeth, has a concrete special security arrangement with USA or other countries, and is in EU then NATO is not completely necessary - Russia will not dare to try to attack again (preventing a Russian attack would have been the whole point of NATO membership, anyways). Ukraine will be purged of Russian culture and influence, becomes a cohesive monoethnic nation-state like Poland. This would put ethnic or geopolitical concerns behind it and the focus can be on normal "boring" topics like corruption, tax policy, etc. Balancing these good things with the loss of the Crimean corridor would be a draw for Ukraine. This plus regaining all the pre-2022 territory (getting the corridor back) would be a win.

    I don't think taking 1991 territory would be great for Ukraine - why all those ethnic Russians? With Crimea it would at least mean some strategic advantage by not having the Black Sea Fleet to the South, so I suppose there would be some advantages as well as disadvantages of 1.5 million+ Russian voters. Ideally it would stay Russian but be demilitarized.

    Or at least, if Ukraine were to take some sparsely populated parts of northern Crimea. This would place everything within Ukrainian missile range and would neutralize Russia's strategic threat. And would not be many Russian voters (this part of Crimea had the most ethnic Ukrainians in it, anyways).

    If the war ends with Russia keeping Crimea-Donbass-Azov corridor it would be a clear win. And a much worse result for Kiev than taking the Minsk deal.
     
    It would only be a worse result than taking the Minsk deal if Ukraine were demilitarized, forced to adopt Russian as a second language, and barred from ever having EU and/or NATO membership. In that case it would be like Minsk, minus some territories.

    Replies: @John Johnson, @Mr. XYZ

  182. Dmitry Utkin, I thought you were a Rodnover, what are you doing raising such trouble right on Summer Solstice? 🙂 Ok, I get it, it’s because everyone is relaxing at their dacha, a good moment to do this kind of a thing, it’s been done before. Although August has historically been the month for these kinds of things.

    So now I understand what he meant when he wrote a few weeks ago, in a very rare public message: “I will begin” or, rather, “I’m beginning” (Я начну). I went for weeks wondering “What will you begin…?”. Sounded kind of ominous.

    This was supposed to have happened later, after more visible Ukrainian advances, closer to next year. But apparently Putin cut Prigo from state funding. This and the pain they have endured prompted this earlier than expected (the pain started earlier than has been admitted openly). So now an interesting question, going forward, is what resources Prigo will retain, whether Prigo (or anyone else who would be in his Z patriot niche) could gain any funding from the oligarchs and rich businessmen, this could only happen if Prigo’s faction becomes stronger. Oligarchs like to give to those (on different sides) who have a good chance to win and gain power.

    Even with this confrontation averted, the issues still remain. Both political issues and financial. What happens now? If it were 1991, the state would’ve probably acted more aggressively (with OMON, etc). What was Spetsnaz G(R)U doing?

    It’s clear that they all will not be able to sit at the same table (Prigo, Surovikin, etc.. btw, did you guys see how Surovikin was holding a rifle on his knee during his speech, totally wild!).

    Another question I’ve raised in the last few months has been about the state of Rosgvardia. Over the past years, looking at them, one can say they seem to be in good shape, but they are gendarmes, could these Moscow princes with their elegant capes take on battle hardened patriot forces (or even crazier, battle hardened former violent criminals)? Besides, some in Rosgvardia apparently support Prigo, and while they would have to follow their orders, in these kinds of situations, you never know how the chips will fall. Where the loyalty of these siloviks will go and in what proportion.

    Same for the other siloviki. We just saw that they do not want to fight Wagner. Prigo said the border guards were giving them hugs, Wagner moved a considerable distance like knife through butter. And, by the way, this is what the Russian Volunteer Corps (RDK) had already established prior through their raiding of the Belgorod region. And it is possible that Prigo was hoping that the Russian troops would follow him. The RDK have also received some feedback from various parts of glubinka of people wanting to join. Maybe not in large numbers, but there are some signs there.

    And, of course, this has major consequences for the power structures and even the statehood of RusFed. It is obvious now that the power structure held by Putin is not monolithic.

    • LOL: LondonBob
  183. @Ivashka the fool
    @Mr. Hack

    That's why we'll see tomorrow.

    Although, Russians are already joking that "Putin has joined the Wagnerite mutiny".

    BTW, I am sorry to note that your cartoon is Antisemitic Mr Hack. Drawing Prigozhin as a rabid dog is a hate crime against a Jewish individual.

    🙂

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

    Perhaps, but I have it on good authority that the steak that Putler has thrown to Prigozhin has undergone all of the strict dietary laws leading to the pure state of being known as kosher. 🙂

    • LOL: Ivashka the fool
  184. @Greasy William
    @Beckow

    Assuming the current lines mostly hold, Ukraine will have gained true independence from Russia, which it absolutely did not have before the SMO. Ukraine also now has a much greater degree of internal cohesion than it did prior to the war. And now that Ukraine is truly free from Russia and severe internal division, it will finally be able to begin developing civic institutions and reducing corruption.

    Russia, otoh, has lost all of its influence in Ukraine, making this war the biggest foreign policy disaster in Russian history.

    Ukraine lost territory and lives, but gained its freedom. Russia lost all its influence in its most important neighbor but gained new territories along with increased regime strength and stability, self confidence and international respect. The US lost a great deal of its own international prestige but prevented Ukraine from being erased from the map.

    That's about as draw-ish as it gets.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Beckow

    To summarize your win-loss argument: Ukraine won intangibles like “freedom” but lost territory, men and resources. Russia won materially, but the loser (Ukraine) now hates them even more.

    Isn’t that how most wars end? The winner gets real stuff, but is hated by the losing side who goes on and on about how the fact that they are not dead means that now they are “free”. Freedom with less territory and more poverty, with millions who left and infrastructure destroyed. But they will blabber about ‘freedom’ although in reality nothing in that respect has changed between 2021 and now.

    I also don’t understand your point about Ukraine not having “real independence” after Maidan. How could that be? They had about as hostile relations with Russia as is humanly possible, they banned everything from trade to Russian books and statues.

    What was that all about if they were according to you still not truly independent of Russia? When you write absurd stuff like that you frankly sound like a not very smart propagandist. Or maybe just not very smart.

    • Replies: @Greasy William
    @Beckow

    Russia still had a fair degree of power over Ukraine post 2014. A huge chunk of the Ukrainian population were Russian sympathizers, Russia had influence over/contacts with some Ukrainian politicians and there was always the possibility that Russia could just annex Ukraine entirely if Russia was pushed too far.

    Although you may deny it, everyone knows that Russia's goal was to ultimately return to at least the pre 2005 situation, if not fully formally absorb Ukraine (the latter being more likely, in my view). All that is gone now. Russia can still annihilate Ukraine, but only at the cost of starting WWIII.

    From an anti US position, this war has worked out great. From a Russian nationalist position, not so much. Hence Strelkov's bottomless rage

    Replies: @Beckow

    , @silviosilver
    @Beckow


    Isn’t that how most wars end? The winner gets real stuff, but is hated by the losing side who goes on and on about how the fact that they are not dead means that now they are “free”.
     
    I can't think of any wars that ended with the loser pretending that, not being dead, they are now free. Give me an example.

    Freedom with less territory and more poverty, with millions who left and infrastructure destroyed.
     
    A submaximal territorial footprint, damaged infrastructure, and an (initial) increase in poverty and emigration are not inconsistent with greater freedom. It seems to me that the price all successful liberation movements have paid includes some or all of those factors.

    Replies: @Beckow

  185. @LondonBob
    I think this whole Wagner coup is even funnier than the forty mile truck traffic jam west of Kiev.

    Some people have been made to look very stupid. Good propaganda plays on the prejudices and ignorance of the target audience.

    Replies: @Greasy William, @Wokechoke

    It was bizarre that the NAFO shills weren’t just hopeful, they actually were certain that Putin had been overthrown and that Ukraine had won the war. These people live in a complete dream world

    • Agree: Mikhail
  186. @Mr. XYZ
    @AP


    If Russia keeps some of the Crimean corridor, but Ukraine gets into EU and/or NATO and gets massive reconstruction aid, it is a draw. If Russia loses the corridor, it’s a Ukrainian win.

     

    Would Ukraine actually be willing to accept a (Crimea + Donbass) for NATO deal? I mean, an awful lot of their blood has already been shed in this war. It arguably makes sense for them to accept, but again, anti-Russian feelings are probably extraordinarily high in Ukraine right now--certainly considerably higher than they were back in January 2022.

    If Russia goes get to keep Crimea and Donbass, though, then it should certainly pay very generous reparations to Ukraine. I mean on top of having its seized asserts being used for Ukraine's reconstruction. (Really is uplifting, when you think about it: Russian oligarchs often acquired their money in shady ways and now a sizable part of their money is finally actually going to be used for a noble purpose.)

    Replies: @Beckow, @John Johnson

    …Would Ukraine actually be willing to accept a (Crimea + Donbass) for NATO deal?

    Unless Russia completely loses the war that deal won’t be offered. Regarding whether Ukies would ever accept it: you can find hundreds of cases of border disputes where the losing side has never accepted it: Cyprus and Greece, Kashmir, Palestine, even Western Poland or pre-Trianon Hungary. What difference does that make?

    But a more interesting point is what would Kiev do with Crimea and Donbas if it would by some miracle get them back. 5-7 million Russians would be expelled? Murdered? Kiev would apply its policy of banning the Russian language and schools in areas that are 80-90% Russian, can you even imagine that?

    Would they put a Bandera statue in Sevastopol or Donetsk? You should think these things through because having irrational dreams with a touch of genocide is no way to win wars. Or friends.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @Beckow

    By western Poland, do you mean Danzig and the Polish Corridor?


    But a more interesting point is what would Kiev do with Crimea and Donbas if it would by some miracle get them back. 5-7 million Russians would be expelled? Murdered? Kiev would apply its policy of banning the Russian language and schools in areas that are 80-90% Russian, can you even imagine that?
     
    Give them South Tyrol-style autonomy, no?

    Replies: @Beckow

  187. @Beckow
    @Greasy William

    To summarize your win-loss argument: Ukraine won intangibles like "freedom" but lost territory, men and resources. Russia won materially, but the loser (Ukraine) now hates them even more.

    Isn't that how most wars end? The winner gets real stuff, but is hated by the losing side who goes on and on about how the fact that they are not dead means that now they are "free". Freedom with less territory and more poverty, with millions who left and infrastructure destroyed. But they will blabber about 'freedom' although in reality nothing in that respect has changed between 2021 and now.

    I also don't understand your point about Ukraine not having "real independence" after Maidan. How could that be? They had about as hostile relations with Russia as is humanly possible, they banned everything from trade to Russian books and statues.

    What was that all about if they were according to you still not truly independent of Russia? When you write absurd stuff like that you frankly sound like a not very smart propagandist. Or maybe just not very smart.

    Replies: @Greasy William, @silviosilver

    Russia still had a fair degree of power over Ukraine post 2014. A huge chunk of the Ukrainian population were Russian sympathizers, Russia had influence over/contacts with some Ukrainian politicians and there was always the possibility that Russia could just annex Ukraine entirely if Russia was pushed too far.

    Although you may deny it, everyone knows that Russia’s goal was to ultimately return to at least the pre 2005 situation, if not fully formally absorb Ukraine (the latter being more likely, in my view). All that is gone now. Russia can still annihilate Ukraine, but only at the cost of starting WWIII.

    From an anti US position, this war has worked out great. From a Russian nationalist position, not so much. Hence Strelkov’s bottomless rage

    • Replies: @Beckow
    @Greasy William


    ...Russia still had a fair degree of power over Ukraine post 2014.
     
    Not in any meaningful sense. You can argue that post 2022 the residual support for Russia in Ukraine further dropped. But the pre-2022 Ukraine was already a militantly anti-Russian state and any pro-Russian sentiments were brutally suppressed (Odessa 2014...). So the gain for the pro-Western Ukies is largely illusory.

    Your claim that the war created an "independent Ukraine" makes no sense - it is a slogan. You can feel that way, but for an objective observer it is nonsense. If anything, today's Ukraine is more dependent on its Western sponsors - so its "independence" is less, not more.


    Russia’s goal was to ultimately return to at least the pre 2005 situation, if not fully formally absorb Ukraine...All that is gone now. Russia can still annihilate Ukraine, but only at the cost of starting WWIII.
     
    And US's goal is to ultimately control every square inch of the earth's surface. And UK's goal is to dismember Russia and make sure that no Russians are left. And my goal is to own all of Europe's real estate. And your goal is...you see how silly that is? The goals or dreams that you project on the others are neither verifiable nor meaningful. Who knows? At what point? Is "Russia" a person with unchangeable permanent goals? How would that work?

    Russia has been very clear about its goals: no Nato in Ukraine and normal human rights for Russians in Ukraine. Maybe they are lying and the real goal is to conquer everything to Sardinia. But how would that be relevant to the current situation? You and that fellow 'Strelkov?" can have a nice bitch-fest about it - and it would still mean nothing.

    Replies: @Greasy William

  188. @Yahya
    @Ivashka the fool

    Prigozhin would be suicidal to agree to a truce/withdrawal.

    He needs to finish the task, or he is finished.

    Putin & co will slowly strangle his organization by depriving them of resources and recruitment.

    You can’t walk back a coup attempt and expect everything to continue as normal.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @24th Alabama, @Wokechoke

    “If you strike at a king, you must kill him.”
    Ralph Waldo Emerson

    Prigozhin is done, unless Putin promised him
    his life in exchange for standing down.

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @24th Alabama

    RusFed is not a Kingdom, not even a honest dictatorship. It is a KGB + Noviop cooperative. That's the way it started years ago at the Ozero gated community in Leningrad region, and that's the way it still is today. If enough cooperative members vouched for the Kosher Cook then he might feel reassured that the RusFed Coop manager en chef would not move against him. Lukashenko is a very important Coop member, when a few years ago Luka had a show off with Pynya about Ural Kalyi and its Belarusian branch, the Belarusian KGB humiliated RusFed-ian FSB, while Pynya swallowed. Luka is not a joker like Pynya is.

    BTW, speaking of Pynya, a funny thing happened a couple of days ago, it seems that he acquired the magic skill of ubiquity. He was reported by the official site of RusFed-ian presidential administration as being present at two different events at nearly the same time, which would be impossible given that they are at least half an hour drive from each other. The first event was a strategic council meeting that was probably due to last at least half an hour. But he was also announced as laying a wreath of flowers at some monument. At the second event he was filmed and shown on TV. If we add that there was an occasion where Putin forgot that he spoke German, another one when he had a hard time riding a horse and another one where he said that he served in the Marine Infantry, which he never did, it all becomes quite peculiar. Basically, people are starting to wonder how many "Putins" are there in RusFed and which one of them is the original one if any.

    Perhaps that's why the Kosher Cook has literally called him an old f☆ck (старый муд☆к) not so long ago. He wouldn't have spoken that way of a Dreadful Dictator and repeated Times Magazine Man of the Year that the West has carried in its imagination for a couple of decades already. But he could say that of an aging actor and his colleagues trying the best they can to impersonate an aging Coop manager...

    Replies: @QCIC, @24th Alabama

  189. @LondonBob
    I think this whole Wagner coup is even funnier than the forty mile truck traffic jam west of Kiev.

    Some people have been made to look very stupid. Good propaganda plays on the prejudices and ignorance of the target audience.

    Replies: @Greasy William, @Wokechoke

    I’d still shoot Prigozhin. Big mouthed Jews shouldn’t be left alive.

  190. @Mr. Hack
    @Ivashka the fool

    Unless I misunderstand you, the information that you present in comment #167 that appeals to you clearly shows that Prigozhin is indeed ready to negotiate an end to hostilities. Yet you agree with Yahya that Prigozhin would be suicidal to agree to any sort of truce/withdrawal??

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/content/dam/news/2023/06/24/TELEMMGLPICT000340508436_16876269101710_trans_NvBQzQNjv4Bqz8PrEBUoq2NOeDT9dFlgSyDBQNy5F1lNIrn6Q9TU920.jpeg

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Wokechoke

    Russian banishes the evil Jew to the Pripet Marshes. Awesome.

    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @Wokechoke



    https://i.pinimg.com/originals/c9/f0/8d/c9f08d7a99f565cc3ded9abf111c103b.jpg

    Banishment to the Pipyet Marshes....

  191. Big mouthed Jews

    I resemble that remark

    • LOL: Ivashka the fool
    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @Greasy William

    Shut up big nose

  192. @Beckow
    @Mr. XYZ


    ...Would Ukraine actually be willing to accept a (Crimea + Donbass) for NATO deal?
     
    Unless Russia completely loses the war that deal won't be offered. Regarding whether Ukies would ever accept it: you can find hundreds of cases of border disputes where the losing side has never accepted it: Cyprus and Greece, Kashmir, Palestine, even Western Poland or pre-Trianon Hungary. What difference does that make?

    But a more interesting point is what would Kiev do with Crimea and Donbas if it would by some miracle get them back. 5-7 million Russians would be expelled? Murdered? Kiev would apply its policy of banning the Russian language and schools in areas that are 80-90% Russian, can you even imagine that?

    Would they put a Bandera statue in Sevastopol or Donetsk? You should think these things through because having irrational dreams with a touch of genocide is no way to win wars. Or friends.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    By western Poland, do you mean Danzig and the Polish Corridor?

    But a more interesting point is what would Kiev do with Crimea and Donbas if it would by some miracle get them back. 5-7 million Russians would be expelled? Murdered? Kiev would apply its policy of banning the Russian language and schools in areas that are 80-90% Russian, can you even imagine that?

    Give them South Tyrol-style autonomy, no?

    • Replies: @Beckow
    @Mr. XYZ


    ...By western Poland, do you mean Danzig and the Polish Corridor?
     
    No I mean Stettin, Pomerania and Silesia...formerly German. There are Germans who would like to change it. Same as with all border disputes, it is almost never finally settled.

    Give them South Tyrol-style autonomy, no?
     
    Kiev took away Russian (and Hungarian, Tatar...) as the second language in Ukraine. They refused a Minsk deal with Donbas autonomy. Who would believe them now? That's not something Zelko&gang are even willing to discuss. Until they lose.
  193. @The Alarmist
    @Mr. XYZ


    Ukraine will never agree to give up its EU aspirations ....
     
    You assume there will still be an EU worth joining, much less anything more than a rump state of 404.

    The West and the USA are in no position to force Russia to do anything.

    Replies: @Miro23, @Mr. XYZ

    The EU will need an awful lot more Muslims and Africans for it to stop being attractive. The US’s tens of millions of African-Americans have not been enough to ruin the US’s appeal and attraction, just so long as one will stay out of areas that have a large African-American presence.

  194. @AP
    @Mikhail

    You keep on being wrong.

    Looks like Ukrainian intelligence who have been warning of a Russian civil war for awhile, knew what they were talking about. Good for Budanov :-)

    Replies: @Mikhail, @Wokechoke

    Those personalities seem to be concentrated in the entourage of Prigozhid now. All banished.

  195. @Sean
    @John Johnson

    Just as Chamberlain's government --loath to rerun WW1-- nevertheless gave a full territorial guarantee to Poland the instant the Nazi Soviet pact became known, Ukraine's coalescing military understanding with and orientation to the West is now regarded by the Kremlin as making war necessary at whatever cost. That sudden assignment was the sort of thing Russia's army might reasonably be expected to be ready for. However, the peacetime Russian army is kept procedurally hidebound because in peace the army' combat effectiveness and morale being very low does not matter. For the Kremlin, the army's status in Russian society being low is deliberate policy (fantastic as it seems Russian gangsters extort money from soldiers, including officers and even members of the nuclear forces) and this is because it has he priority of making sure the military top brass can never be a political force in their own right. Command has a way of going to a mans head and recent events involving Prigozhin show that the Kremlin's worries about not keeping a very bureaucratic chain of command were not so paranoid.

    The quick practical methods of command based on personal loyalty to leaders that are inherent to success in actual combat confer a danger for the Kremlin inasmuch as the army leadership might have the potential for a power play. Wagner was already combat experienced and agile, so it was used in Bakhmut with new Z-convict expendables, and with regulary army fire support and shell supply achieved victory. There seems to have been an understanding between Putin and Prigozhin that he could draw attention to Wagner and contrast its achievements with the regular army; this would have given the Kremlin a useful way to goad the regular army to greater efforts. With the balance of his mind disturbed, Prigozhin wrongly thought he had carte blanch for any action against the army brass hats, no matter how egregious.

    Prigozhin completely lacks an independent power base, so nothing could come of him using the relatively tiny Wagner to stage a genuine revolt against the huge Russian army , still less the Kremlin that ultimately controls the army, but his own death along with any who followed him' He made his money in casinos (a licence to print money) and is smart but not terribly level headed in view of his failure at youthful petty criminality , and he did spend time at the sharp end in Bakhmut, maybe too much because certain of his appearances--as with the ones that showed him raging at the army behind a pile of his own men's corpses--may indicate a touch of traumatic stress disorder. May he be have been resorting to drugs to unwind? The idea that Sergei Shoigu is a mastermind who pulled the strings of Putin and got into a war with Ukraine so Shoigu could be promoted, as alleged by Prigozhin, is risible; is accusations are a symptom of him losing his mind. He is about to find himself back in prison. Wagner is not longer required because the regulars have their own Zpenal battalions now. Wagner personnel had to sign contrast with the regular army by July, he thought his position of independent control was disappearing so he started echoing Western commentators about the origin and course of the conflict; he said the Ukraine were about to take a strategic town they are nowhere near and not even advancing towards.

    At the end of the day ordinary Russians entering the army are convinced that they are fighting Nato, and this is a battle for the survival of the thousand year existence of the Russian state, seen as the only thing safeguarding the existence of the Russian people. Ukraine's cross border raid into Russia proper may have been intended to distract from the loss of Bakhmut, but made it look like Ukraine was Nazi: hunting ordinary Russians just for being Russia. This was a gift to Putin. Prigozhin's escapade may be a PR triumph for Ukraine in the West and damage his standing among Chinese, Indian and Iranian elites but in Russia it will play to increasing Putin's authority. Something very unpleasant will happen to Zelensky the instant Putin is assassinated. There are standing instructions in the Kremlin to that effect--rely on it.

    Only the Russian army counts now and Putin has given them what they want at the cost of increasing their status to Great Patriotic War rather than SMO levels. It is like WW2 where Soviet generals tortured into confessing and convicted of spying were released from the Gulag and reinstated at their previous rank to do their jobs. A few years later the Austrian whose name is better left unmentioned was telling his staff the have faith and remember the deliverance of Fredrick's Prussia. To which they later scoffed "Which Tsarina is going to die this time?" Zelensky is going to be increasingly be predicting another but successful coup as deus ex machina for an inexorably deteriorating military situation against the behemoth Russia army becomes ever clearer, and the limit on how far America will go stops at direct involvement--the only thing that can ultimately defeat or hold back the Russian army.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DNbad82plR0

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    Just as Chamberlain’s government –loath to rerun WW1– nevertheless gave a full territorial guarantee to Poland the instant the Nazi Soviet pact became known,

    The British guarantee to Poland actually preceded the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact by several months, IIRC. And the British guarantee to Poland was received extremely negatively by Hitler and made Hitler more likely to attack Poland, with Hitler quickly repudiating the 1934 German-Polish Non-Aggression Pact afterwards.

    • Replies: @Sean
    @Mr. XYZ

    Only the guarantee of Poland's independence preceded the Nazi Soviet pact. Chamberlain left open that Germany could get some concession of territory from Poland thereby enabling the Nazis and Soviets to have a border with one another one another so Hitler could fight Russia. The Chamberlain guarantee to Poland was strengthened to a territorial one immediately after the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, because at that point everyone realised that Germany was going to go West first.

  196. @24th Alabama
    @Yahya

    "If you strike at a king, you must kill him."
    Ralph Waldo Emerson

    Prigozhin is done, unless Putin promised him
    his life in exchange for standing down.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

    RusFed is not a Kingdom, not even a honest dictatorship. It is a KGB + Noviop cooperative. That’s the way it started years ago at the Ozero gated community in Leningrad region, and that’s the way it still is today. If enough cooperative members vouched for the Kosher Cook then he might feel reassured that the RusFed Coop manager en chef would not move against him. Lukashenko is a very important Coop member, when a few years ago Luka had a show off with Pynya about Ural Kalyi and its Belarusian branch, the Belarusian KGB humiliated RusFed-ian FSB, while Pynya swallowed. Luka is not a joker like Pynya is.

    BTW, speaking of Pynya, a funny thing happened a couple of days ago, it seems that he acquired the magic skill of ubiquity. He was reported by the official site of RusFed-ian presidential administration as being present at two different events at nearly the same time, which would be impossible given that they are at least half an hour drive from each other. The first event was a strategic council meeting that was probably due to last at least half an hour. But he was also announced as laying a wreath of flowers at some monument. At the second event he was filmed and shown on TV. If we add that there was an occasion where Putin forgot that he spoke German, another one when he had a hard time riding a horse and another one where he said that he served in the Marine Infantry, which he never did, it all becomes quite peculiar. Basically, people are starting to wonder how many “Putins” are there in RusFed and which one of them is the original one if any.

    Perhaps that’s why the Kosher Cook has literally called him an old f☆ck (старый муд☆к) not so long ago. He wouldn’t have spoken that way of a Dreadful Dictator and repeated Times Magazine Man of the Year that the West has carried in its imagination for a couple of decades already. But he could say that of an aging actor and his colleagues trying the best they can to impersonate an aging Coop manager…

    • Replies: @QCIC
    @Ivashka the fool

    At one point I saw some intriguing photos of a suspected Biden double. Also at least one for Hillary on a minor speech after she had turned into the walking dead while campaigning against Trump.

    With modern surgery and make-up body doubles may be more common than we realize. My understanding is they have long been used to stand in for dangerous public appearances. This was discussed a bit during the Gulf War when they were searching for Saddam.

    I wonder if Putin's doubles are tall enough to make JJ happy?

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

    , @24th Alabama
    @Ivashka the fool

    By any objective measure Vladimir Putin is the greatest Russian leader of
    the last two hundred years, and is recognized as such by most of the world
    outside the reach of the virulent Western media.

    As far as I know he has attempted to peacefully settle every internal and
    international dispute by peaceful means, using force only as a last resort,
    as we would expect of the only remaining Christian leader of a major nation,
    excepting Italy.

    Obviously, you style yourself as a sort of a Russian insider, albeit a petulant one, so naturally I am curious about the reason for your angst if you can disclose that without revealing your identity. Surely, your beef against Vlad is not entirely due to a bias against short guys. Many men dislike tall women, a fact that has worked to the advantage of us who don't care.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Ivashka the fool

  197. @Mr. XYZ
    @Sean


    Just as Chamberlain’s government –loath to rerun WW1– nevertheless gave a full territorial guarantee to Poland the instant the Nazi Soviet pact became known,
     
    The British guarantee to Poland actually preceded the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact by several months, IIRC. And the British guarantee to Poland was received extremely negatively by Hitler and made Hitler more likely to attack Poland, with Hitler quickly repudiating the 1934 German-Polish Non-Aggression Pact afterwards.

    Replies: @Sean

    Only the guarantee of Poland’s independence preceded the Nazi Soviet pact. Chamberlain left open that Germany could get some concession of territory from Poland thereby enabling the Nazis and Soviets to have a border with one another one another so Hitler could fight Russia. The Chamberlain guarantee to Poland was strengthened to a territorial one immediately after the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, because at that point everyone realised that Germany was going to go West first.

  198. Implicit possible “underwater” reasons for the unexpected truce between Prigozhin and Putin (with the mediation of Lukashenka and Dyumin)

    “March of Justice” did not reach 200 km to Moscow. But maybe it reached something else, even more sensitive.

    The attack of planes on the bridge in the village of Brodovoye, Anninsky district, Voronezh region, on the way to Borisoglebsk-45 (a closed city with nuclear weapons), in which, as it turns out, not only the bridge was not destroyed, but the plane seemed to have been shot down, suggests that The Ministry of Defense took seriously the information about the possible capture of a military unit with nuclear weapons by units of the Wagner PMC. Moreover, Borisoglebsk, where the “musicians” were seen, lies far to the side, to the east of the route “To Moscow”. And they could not go there “on the way”.

    But influential characters from across the sea, for whom nuclear safety on the planet is an unconditional priority, could urgently join the topic. As well as control over their nuclear arsenals is the unconditional responsibility of the state authorities in the face of the whole concert of world elites.

    Unimpeded walks of armed rebels across the territory of a country with a nuclear arsenal are intolerable. And one suspicion of the possibility of partial mastery of their nuclear arsenals is enough to put a final cross on the reputation of the country’s leadership in the eyes of the whole world.

    If there was a plan for such blackmail of the supreme power, then it was fully implemented today. It is difficult to explain in any other way such a radical change in the position of the President of Russia, who in the morning did not leave the unnamed “traitor” a chance for mercy, and in the evening he turned 180 degrees.

    [MORE]

    I have to admit that there is still a variant of the “cunning plan”. In the West, they were shocked by what was happening. Judge for yourself: in a nuclear country, a convoy of African-style militants is moving towards the capital and threatening to seize a nuclear weapon. Against the background of Prigozhin, President Putin really looks like a very attractive and predictable partner. In order for him to stay and for some convicts not to seize power, it is possible to conclude a truce and even more – to remove the sanctions. You already have no real counteroffensive.

    For several months, Moscow tried to scare the West with nuclear weapons. But it looked unconvincing. Well, where is Medvedev and Solovyov, and where are the nuclear ashes? Well come on. And then Prigozhin, with mercenaries in swastikas and convicts, raises a riot, goes to Moscow, shooting down helicopters along the way and sends a convoy to Borisoglebsk-45 for a bomb. Hey, are you out of your mind? Astana! You will have a freeze in Ukraine. Putin stay.

    And then Prigozhin stops and goes to another nuclear power – Belarus.

    Feom the Tg Channels of Dmitriev and Negoro.

  199. AP says:
    @Beckow
    @AP


    ...Russia has already had Crimea and most of Donbas.
     
    Everyone understood that once Kiev and its sponsors rejected Minsk there will have to be a war - so you pretending that the situation after 2014 was stable is quite stupid. Only with the war it looks like Russia has both Crimea and Donbas. Russia has also added substantial parts of Donbas, like Mariupol, etc...

    Ukraine has gained a massive amount of Western weapons, and has gotten closer to EU and NATO.
     
    So you could not come up with any actual gains by Ukraine. The weapons are being used up and lost and they are of no value in peace - which you don't seem to want. And "getting closer"? What the hell does that even mean? Kiev was so close to EU-Nato before 2022 that they put it in their Constitution. Membership in EU or Nato would be something, but getting close only sounds desperate. So no tangible benefits from the war for Ukraine, but some very high costs.

    If Russia keeps some of the Crimean corridor, but Ukraine gets into EU and/or NATO and gets massive reconstruction aid, it is a draw. If Russia loses the corridor, it’s a Ukrainian win.
     
    That means that if Russia keeps the corridor and Ukraine is not in Nato, it is a Russian win. EU is not the same, Russia never objected to it - they simply wanted the free-trade zone to be negotiated with them. If Kiev stops trading with Russia it will not be necessary.

    If the war ends with Russia keeping Crimea-Donbass-Azov corridor it would be a clear win. And a much worse result for Kiev than taking the Minsk deal.

    (About the "licking" part, get a hold of yourself and go to see a psychiatrist. You are making a fool out of yourself.)

    Replies: @AP

    Everyone understood that once Kiev and its sponsors rejected Minsk there will have to be a war

    Good that you acknowledge that Russia would go to war if Ukraine wanted to be fully independent. Minsk demanded that Ukraine cede some sovereignty to Russia.

    so you pretending that the situation after 2014 was stable

    It was as stable as Russia wanted it to be. Apparently Russia did not want stability.

    “Ukraine has gained a massive amount of Western weapons, and has gotten closer to EU and NATO.”

    So you could not come up with any actual gains by Ukraine. The weapons are being used up and lost and they are of no value in peace

    They are being used and replenished.

    Are you too stupid to understand that weapons are an excellent deterrent in peace?

    And “getting closer“? What the hell does that even mean? Kiev was so close to EU-Nato before 2022 that they put it in their Constitution.

    Both NATO and EU have made more serious overtures to Ukraine than before. So membership in both organizations is more likely than in 2014-2021.

    Ukraine is also more cohesive (wars have that effect) and Russian influence largely purged. Voluntarily.

    So no tangible benefits from the war for Ukraine, but some very high costs.

    Well, lots of modern weapons are tangible. Cohesion, freedom from Russia, etc. are intangible but very important.

    If Russia keeps some of the Crimean corridor, but Ukraine gets into EU and/or NATO and gets massive reconstruction aid, it is a draw. If Russia loses the corridor, it’s a Ukrainian win.

    That means that if Russia keeps the corridor and Ukraine is not in Nato

    I wrote NATO and/or EU. If Ukraine is armed to the teeth, has a concrete special security arrangement with USA or other countries, and is in EU then NATO is not completely necessary – Russia will not dare to try to attack again (preventing a Russian attack would have been the whole point of NATO membership, anyways). Ukraine will be purged of Russian culture and influence, becomes a cohesive monoethnic nation-state like Poland. This would put ethnic or geopolitical concerns behind it and the focus can be on normal “boring” topics like corruption, tax policy, etc. Balancing these good things with the loss of the Crimean corridor would be a draw for Ukraine. This plus regaining all the pre-2022 territory (getting the corridor back) would be a win.

    I don’t think taking 1991 territory would be great for Ukraine – why all those ethnic Russians? With Crimea it would at least mean some strategic advantage by not having the Black Sea Fleet to the South, so I suppose there would be some advantages as well as disadvantages of 1.5 million+ Russian voters. Ideally it would stay Russian but be demilitarized.

    Or at least, if Ukraine were to take some sparsely populated parts of northern Crimea. This would place everything within Ukrainian missile range and would neutralize Russia’s strategic threat. And would not be many Russian voters (this part of Crimea had the most ethnic Ukrainians in it, anyways).

    If the war ends with Russia keeping Crimea-Donbass-Azov corridor it would be a clear win. And a much worse result for Kiev than taking the Minsk deal.

    It would only be a worse result than taking the Minsk deal if Ukraine were demilitarized, forced to adopt Russian as a second language, and barred from ever having EU and/or NATO membership. In that case it would be like Minsk, minus some territories.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
    @AP

    I don’t think taking 1991 territory would be great for Ukraine – why all those ethnic Russians?

    It really doesn't matter since most of the militia men are dead.

    The Russians sent them off to the front. There are intercepts where Russian regulars laugh about sending DPR/LPRs to certain doom. They clearly don't view them as Slavic brothers.

    So we are really talking about a lot of single ethnic Russian women. A simple solution would be to marry most of them to ethnic Ukrainians or let them migrate to the US.

    Very similar to WW2 where most of the ethnic Germans in surrounding countries were chased out because they were overwhelmingly women and children. The men had been drafted and weren't around to defend them.

    , @Mr. XYZ
    @AP


    I don’t think taking 1991 territory would be great for Ukraine – why all those ethnic Russians? With Crimea it would at least mean some strategic advantage by not having the Black Sea Fleet to the South, so I suppose there would be some advantages as well as disadvantages of 1.5 million+ Russian voters. Ideally it would stay Russian but be demilitarized.
     
    Worth noting that while Crimea's and Donbass's pro-Russian voters were a very big deal pre-2022, they are less of a big deal nowadays when the rest of Ukraine is much more united and cohesively rallied behind the West. Nowadays, even if Crimea and Donbass were to be reacquired by Ukraine, they won't be able to significantly influence Ukrainian politics, up to the point that I suspect that a sizable part of their population would prefer to move to Russia (unless perhaps Russia will remain heavily sanctioned by the West?) than to live under Ukrainian rule. And I think that some people in Crimea and Donbass can be won over with South Tyrol-style autonomy. It does work for South Tyrol itself, after all. Well, more-or-less.
  200. @Beckow
    @Boethiuss

    You are - as always - getting too excited with anticipation. It looks like the usual internal dispute in a country at war between the moderates and the radicals, or possibly some foreign-sponsored forces. What are you going to do if it fizzles out or fails?

    The giddy excitement that the likes of JJ, AP, Mr. Hacks or you go through at any sign of "good news" betrays your insecurity. Get something done first, your breathless, boastful "Kremlin is about to fall!", "we are taking Crimea!" talk makes you look slightly ridiculous. The main effect so far is that the 80-90% of people in Russia who are on the moderate, but by now firmly anti-Western side, are being consolidated. Given the the West needs either the liberals or the radicals take over in Russia, this is not good news for them. They can't handle sober self-serving Russia, they would like anything else instead. I strongly doubt they will get it. But it is entertaining...

    This has a feeling of our not-so-distant future being very different than anyone has predicted, a turn in human development. I have said before that the Maidan-2022 war, Trump, C19, Brexit will all be in an introductory chapter called Causes. Of course, we have to make it through and there is someone left to write it...:). But I would not celebrate if I were you - the crisis is accelerating and that is not good for anyone.

    Replies: @AP, @John Johnson

    The giddy excitement that the likes of JJ, AP, Mr. Hacks or you go through at any sign of “good news” betrays your insecurity.

    It is entirely good news for those of us that support Ukraine. What is wrong with being excited about good news?

    This has been an embarrassment for Putin and his US basement defense force.

    Half of them were still holding out for the theory that Prigozhin’s insubordinance was all an elaborate 5D chess play.

    Well that is out which means Putin is unable to control him and Bakhmut was never a trap.

    Would have been nice if the dwarf shot it out with brainy orc but this is all still a wonderful development.

    It will still be fun to see how Russian State TV tries to spin this. They have also been promoting the theory that everything has been by Putin’s design as if he is Palpatine and we mortals can’t comprehend his complex plans.

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @John Johnson

    In a certain sense banishing Prigozhid is fantastic news.

    What Jews will you focus on next to promote you shabby goy, you?

    , @Beckow
    @John Johnson

    Let's see: large 20k well-armed Wagner army has moved to Belarus. And nobody made a peep...now they will sit on the Ukie northern border, close to Poland and Lithuania if they try to move to Western Ukr. That is what happened - all else looks like theatre and noise. Some actors may even believe that it was real. Do you?

    What are you celebrating? Russia has in a few weeks moved nukes to Belarus and now an army. With Luka-the-tractorist managing it. Three years ago you thought you captured Belarus, you even named some lady as its "president" (where is she now?)...You are really bad at strategy and thinking stuff through. No wonder people walk all over you: goat herders in Kabul, barefoot Vietnam peasants, Caracas bus driver with 90 IQ, and now the tractor driver in Belarus...

  201. @Mr. XYZ
    @AP


    If Russia keeps some of the Crimean corridor, but Ukraine gets into EU and/or NATO and gets massive reconstruction aid, it is a draw. If Russia loses the corridor, it’s a Ukrainian win.

     

    Would Ukraine actually be willing to accept a (Crimea + Donbass) for NATO deal? I mean, an awful lot of their blood has already been shed in this war. It arguably makes sense for them to accept, but again, anti-Russian feelings are probably extraordinarily high in Ukraine right now--certainly considerably higher than they were back in January 2022.

    If Russia goes get to keep Crimea and Donbass, though, then it should certainly pay very generous reparations to Ukraine. I mean on top of having its seized asserts being used for Ukraine's reconstruction. (Really is uplifting, when you think about it: Russian oligarchs often acquired their money in shady ways and now a sizable part of their money is finally actually going to be used for a noble purpose.)

    Replies: @Beckow, @John Johnson

    If Russia goes get to keep Crimea and Donbass, though, then it should certainly pay very generous reparations to Ukraine.

    That has huge problems because of the coal basin and nuke plants. The separatists were in part motivated by money because they planned on becoming independent republics with the intent of selling the coal to Russia.

    Russia wouldn’t be able to write a check that covers the Donbas resources in addition to reparations for the war.

    It’s more than land which makes a deal all the more difficult.

    Swiss neutrality with Crimean independence would be a better compromise. That would of course require UN monitoring of elections so Russia can’t put in a puppet government.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @John Johnson

    If Ukraine is to get Swiss neutrality, then it should be combined with EU membership and with regaining all of its 2013 territory. Else, this deal simply wouldn't be sweet enough for Ukraine.


    Russia wouldn’t be able to write a check that covers the Donbas resources in addition to reparations for the war.
     
    But what's the problem here if Russia has already annexed the Donbass?
  202. @AP
    @Beckow


    Everyone understood that once Kiev and its sponsors rejected Minsk there will have to be a war
     
    Good that you acknowledge that Russia would go to war if Ukraine wanted to be fully independent. Minsk demanded that Ukraine cede some sovereignty to Russia.

    so you pretending that the situation after 2014 was stable
     
    It was as stable as Russia wanted it to be. Apparently Russia did not want stability.

    "Ukraine has gained a massive amount of Western weapons, and has gotten closer to EU and NATO."

    So you could not come up with any actual gains by Ukraine. The weapons are being used up and lost and they are of no value in peace
     
    They are being used and replenished.

    Are you too stupid to understand that weapons are an excellent deterrent in peace?

    And “getting closer“? What the hell does that even mean? Kiev was so close to EU-Nato before 2022 that they put it in their Constitution.
     
    Both NATO and EU have made more serious overtures to Ukraine than before. So membership in both organizations is more likely than in 2014-2021.

    Ukraine is also more cohesive (wars have that effect) and Russian influence largely purged. Voluntarily.

    So no tangible benefits from the war for Ukraine, but some very high costs.
     
    Well, lots of modern weapons are tangible. Cohesion, freedom from Russia, etc. are intangible but very important.

    If Russia keeps some of the Crimean corridor, but Ukraine gets into EU and/or NATO and gets massive reconstruction aid, it is a draw. If Russia loses the corridor, it’s a Ukrainian win.

    That means that if Russia keeps the corridor and Ukraine is not in Nato
     
    I wrote NATO and/or EU. If Ukraine is armed to the teeth, has a concrete special security arrangement with USA or other countries, and is in EU then NATO is not completely necessary - Russia will not dare to try to attack again (preventing a Russian attack would have been the whole point of NATO membership, anyways). Ukraine will be purged of Russian culture and influence, becomes a cohesive monoethnic nation-state like Poland. This would put ethnic or geopolitical concerns behind it and the focus can be on normal "boring" topics like corruption, tax policy, etc. Balancing these good things with the loss of the Crimean corridor would be a draw for Ukraine. This plus regaining all the pre-2022 territory (getting the corridor back) would be a win.

    I don't think taking 1991 territory would be great for Ukraine - why all those ethnic Russians? With Crimea it would at least mean some strategic advantage by not having the Black Sea Fleet to the South, so I suppose there would be some advantages as well as disadvantages of 1.5 million+ Russian voters. Ideally it would stay Russian but be demilitarized.

    Or at least, if Ukraine were to take some sparsely populated parts of northern Crimea. This would place everything within Ukrainian missile range and would neutralize Russia's strategic threat. And would not be many Russian voters (this part of Crimea had the most ethnic Ukrainians in it, anyways).

    If the war ends with Russia keeping Crimea-Donbass-Azov corridor it would be a clear win. And a much worse result for Kiev than taking the Minsk deal.
     
    It would only be a worse result than taking the Minsk deal if Ukraine were demilitarized, forced to adopt Russian as a second language, and barred from ever having EU and/or NATO membership. In that case it would be like Minsk, minus some territories.

    Replies: @John Johnson, @Mr. XYZ

    I don’t think taking 1991 territory would be great for Ukraine – why all those ethnic Russians?

    It really doesn’t matter since most of the militia men are dead.

    The Russians sent them off to the front. There are intercepts where Russian regulars laugh about sending DPR/LPRs to certain doom. They clearly don’t view them as Slavic brothers.

    So we are really talking about a lot of single ethnic Russian women. A simple solution would be to marry most of them to ethnic Ukrainians or let them migrate to the US.

    Very similar to WW2 where most of the ethnic Germans in surrounding countries were chased out because they were overwhelmingly women and children. The men had been drafted and weren’t around to defend them.

  203. @AP
    @AP

    But I doubt there will be a 1918-1920. No desperation for a Civil War. Hopefully this ends the invasion of Ukraine, and Ukraine uses the Russian internal problems to better integrate with its Western brothers and maintain a powerful army, two factors that will prevent a future invasion by Russia. Ukraine utterly failed to take advantage of the 1990s in that way, but this time the stakes are very clear to everybody.

    As I said, Ukraine is the Poland of 1919-1920. A smaller state, but a unified state and people lavishly equipped by the West in its fight against the Russian invader.

    PS Kadyrov may still be loyal to Putin. An opportunity to rid Russia of Chechens?

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Mr. XYZ

    But I doubt there will be a 1918-1920. No desperation for a Civil War. Hopefully this ends the invasion of Ukraine, and Ukraine uses the Russian internal problems to better integrate with its Western brothers and maintain a powerful army, two factors that will prevent a future invasion by Russia. Ukraine utterly failed to take advantage of the 1990s in that way, but this time the stakes are very clear to everybody.

    Ukraine should certainly do all of that but it should also seek to combine this with NATO membership as soon as possible so that it becomes a fait accompli. Russia is likely to be pissed off in any case (Russia doesn’t like Western military cooperation with Ukraine even outside of NATO even though such military cooperation is necessary for Ukraine’s own security), so might as well get NATO membership over with so that Russia would complain a bit but won’t be able to subsequently undo it, similar to how Baltic and Finnish NATO memberships are both already faits accompli which Russia can do nothing about.

    1990s Ukraine did a lot of wrong things. The most important wrong thing was not following in Poland’s trajectory, both economically and militarily. The second most important wrong thing was frequently voting for Sovoks, and low-quality ones at that. The third most important wrong thing was to give up its nukes or at the very least to make a deal with the West that it will only give up its nukes in exchange for immediate NATO membership. The West itself was unfortunately too short-sighted in regards to this back then as well, though. Though ironically John Mearsheimer got this specific issue correct–specifically the need for Ukraine to keep its nukes as a deterrent against Russia. Though he later began blaming the West and NATO for provoking Russia. NATO derangement syndrome, anyone?

  204. @Greasy William

    Big mouthed Jews
     
    I resemble that remark

    Replies: @Wokechoke

    Shut up big nose

  205. @AP
    @Beckow


    Everyone understood that once Kiev and its sponsors rejected Minsk there will have to be a war
     
    Good that you acknowledge that Russia would go to war if Ukraine wanted to be fully independent. Minsk demanded that Ukraine cede some sovereignty to Russia.

    so you pretending that the situation after 2014 was stable
     
    It was as stable as Russia wanted it to be. Apparently Russia did not want stability.

    "Ukraine has gained a massive amount of Western weapons, and has gotten closer to EU and NATO."

    So you could not come up with any actual gains by Ukraine. The weapons are being used up and lost and they are of no value in peace
     
    They are being used and replenished.

    Are you too stupid to understand that weapons are an excellent deterrent in peace?

    And “getting closer“? What the hell does that even mean? Kiev was so close to EU-Nato before 2022 that they put it in their Constitution.
     
    Both NATO and EU have made more serious overtures to Ukraine than before. So membership in both organizations is more likely than in 2014-2021.

    Ukraine is also more cohesive (wars have that effect) and Russian influence largely purged. Voluntarily.

    So no tangible benefits from the war for Ukraine, but some very high costs.
     
    Well, lots of modern weapons are tangible. Cohesion, freedom from Russia, etc. are intangible but very important.

    If Russia keeps some of the Crimean corridor, but Ukraine gets into EU and/or NATO and gets massive reconstruction aid, it is a draw. If Russia loses the corridor, it’s a Ukrainian win.

    That means that if Russia keeps the corridor and Ukraine is not in Nato
     
    I wrote NATO and/or EU. If Ukraine is armed to the teeth, has a concrete special security arrangement with USA or other countries, and is in EU then NATO is not completely necessary - Russia will not dare to try to attack again (preventing a Russian attack would have been the whole point of NATO membership, anyways). Ukraine will be purged of Russian culture and influence, becomes a cohesive monoethnic nation-state like Poland. This would put ethnic or geopolitical concerns behind it and the focus can be on normal "boring" topics like corruption, tax policy, etc. Balancing these good things with the loss of the Crimean corridor would be a draw for Ukraine. This plus regaining all the pre-2022 territory (getting the corridor back) would be a win.

    I don't think taking 1991 territory would be great for Ukraine - why all those ethnic Russians? With Crimea it would at least mean some strategic advantage by not having the Black Sea Fleet to the South, so I suppose there would be some advantages as well as disadvantages of 1.5 million+ Russian voters. Ideally it would stay Russian but be demilitarized.

    Or at least, if Ukraine were to take some sparsely populated parts of northern Crimea. This would place everything within Ukrainian missile range and would neutralize Russia's strategic threat. And would not be many Russian voters (this part of Crimea had the most ethnic Ukrainians in it, anyways).

    If the war ends with Russia keeping Crimea-Donbass-Azov corridor it would be a clear win. And a much worse result for Kiev than taking the Minsk deal.
     
    It would only be a worse result than taking the Minsk deal if Ukraine were demilitarized, forced to adopt Russian as a second language, and barred from ever having EU and/or NATO membership. In that case it would be like Minsk, minus some territories.

    Replies: @John Johnson, @Mr. XYZ

    I don’t think taking 1991 territory would be great for Ukraine – why all those ethnic Russians? With Crimea it would at least mean some strategic advantage by not having the Black Sea Fleet to the South, so I suppose there would be some advantages as well as disadvantages of 1.5 million+ Russian voters. Ideally it would stay Russian but be demilitarized.

    Worth noting that while Crimea’s and Donbass’s pro-Russian voters were a very big deal pre-2022, they are less of a big deal nowadays when the rest of Ukraine is much more united and cohesively rallied behind the West. Nowadays, even if Crimea and Donbass were to be reacquired by Ukraine, they won’t be able to significantly influence Ukrainian politics, up to the point that I suspect that a sizable part of their population would prefer to move to Russia (unless perhaps Russia will remain heavily sanctioned by the West?) than to live under Ukrainian rule. And I think that some people in Crimea and Donbass can be won over with South Tyrol-style autonomy. It does work for South Tyrol itself, after all. Well, more-or-less.

  206. @John Johnson
    @Mr. XYZ

    If Russia goes get to keep Crimea and Donbass, though, then it should certainly pay very generous reparations to Ukraine.

    That has huge problems because of the coal basin and nuke plants. The separatists were in part motivated by money because they planned on becoming independent republics with the intent of selling the coal to Russia.

    Russia wouldn't be able to write a check that covers the Donbas resources in addition to reparations for the war.

    It's more than land which makes a deal all the more difficult.

    Swiss neutrality with Crimean independence would be a better compromise. That would of course require UN monitoring of elections so Russia can't put in a puppet government.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    If Ukraine is to get Swiss neutrality, then it should be combined with EU membership and with regaining all of its 2013 territory. Else, this deal simply wouldn’t be sweet enough for Ukraine.

    Russia wouldn’t be able to write a check that covers the Donbas resources in addition to reparations for the war.

    But what’s the problem here if Russia has already annexed the Donbass?

  207. @John Johnson
    @Beckow

    The giddy excitement that the likes of JJ, AP, Mr. Hacks or you go through at any sign of “good news” betrays your insecurity.

    It is entirely good news for those of us that support Ukraine. What is wrong with being excited about good news?

    This has been an embarrassment for Putin and his US basement defense force.

    Half of them were still holding out for the theory that Prigozhin's insubordinance was all an elaborate 5D chess play.

    Well that is out which means Putin is unable to control him and Bakhmut was never a trap.

    Would have been nice if the dwarf shot it out with brainy orc but this is all still a wonderful development.

    It will still be fun to see how Russian State TV tries to spin this. They have also been promoting the theory that everything has been by Putin's design as if he is Palpatine and we mortals can't comprehend his complex plans.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @Beckow

    In a certain sense banishing Prigozhid is fantastic news.

    What Jews will you focus on next to promote you shabby goy, you?

  208. @AP
    @Hartnell


    The Eastern European Youth are too obsessed with democracy, freedom, individualism and in general having a good quality of life.
     
    Sure, they are young. But they are not Woke. They are normal.

    To be honest, saving Europe itself will have to be on the West’s initiative at this stage. The Slavs are not going to do it.
     
    The Slavs cannot do it alone, but their large reservoir of generally conservative people and large territories with few foreigners are probably necessary for eventual renewal. Ukraine would be almost like another Poland in terms of population. Belarus (if...) another Hungary.

    Italy seems to be the first Western country to flip. Support for traditional forces is strongest among the young there.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Dmitry

    they are young. But they are not Woke. They are normal.

    Eastern Europe is zone of relatively lack of culture, creativity, original and tradition, in relation to Western Europe. As result, almost everything related to culture in Eastern Europe, is imported from West or more recently also East Asia.

    There isn’t a local culture production anymore and even in the 19th century the local production was dying and replaced with local versions of Western culture. But the culture you import from the developed countries still has to match to economic level, to social life, of people who will use this culture.

    Third and second world is always a kind of recycling machine for the culture of the first world. Old cars and clothes from the wealthy countries, are imported and recyled by the local people. Even Marxism could be recyled in incompetent way by the third world in the 20th century. But it has to be possible for use by the local people. You can import Toyota Landcruiser to African roads, not a Kei car.

    “Woke” is an elite ideology which is popular with wealthy Westerners who are living very socially conservative they don’t like loud noises or clapping https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrVlrZX4UsI.

    For example, one of more popular youth fashion in Russia was in last decade (although less than “Kpop”) was “offnik” fashion, it’s the local copy of English football hooligan culture, wearing or beating people wearing “River Island” or “Burberry” cloths.

    Youth culture in Russia is created by watching English hooligan films like “The Football Factory” (2004) and trying to copy characters of England, their clothes and lifestyle.

    For the young people in Perm, it’s possible to copy the characters of English working class films like “The Football Factory”, where the lifestyle is a socially liberal.

    It’s not possible to copy woke ideology of upper class young people of Harvard and the Dartmouth College, who are not drinking alcohol or using drugs in the weekend, who don’t have relationships with women because they are studying, who don’t like loud noises, who don’t live with polluted industrial environment, who don’t want to fight anyone etc.

    This is probably one why woke culture is difficult usually to import in Eastern Europe, except to some elite circles. It’s like importing ballet from Paris to the 19th century Russian village, it would be limited only to some elite cities. Within a context of Ukraine, they can probably recycle parts of the woke culture by adding this to their nationalism importation projects.

    Like Cubans recycling parts of the different cars, in Ukraine they will say if your are Russians wearing embroidary, you are culturally appropriating the native customs of Ukraine.

    • Agree: Mr. XYZ
    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @Dmitry

    After the year 1000, Eastern Europe was always considerably less accomplished, especially per capita, relative to Western Europe:

    https://inquisitivebird.substack.com/p/the-rise-of-the-west?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2

    https://inquisitivebird.substack.com/p/which-european-nations-are-overrepresented?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2

    https://inquisitivebird.substack.com/p/notable-people-in-science-europe?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2

    Some charts from the articles above:

    https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F1eafb23d-ca9e-4cbe-be7f-78a41f1acc0b_1267x893.png

    https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F1a30831c-dca0-4e66-a422-efe5c8fc42ce_1267x893.png

    https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fd3bf3d4c-6760-4907-83c8-15f88bf07580_1116x862.png

    https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fb18c8704-db1f-4db7-83ab-4e8593eff3d9_982x897.png

    https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fb843b075-0f17-4391-84b9-1105a1559234_791x910.png

    https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F325c23a4-9fe8-437e-9ac4-788521a0cace_815x599.png

    Expecting Europeans from outside of the Hajnal Line to take over the leadership of the West from within-Hajnal Line Europeans is just ridiculous! In ancient times, they could definitely compete, but not after the year 1000:

    https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Feb3dc420-ffc6-499c-996a-5f0258f5c4c2_1084x732.png

    That's from 700 BC to 1000 AD.

    https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F94dcf858-e57a-4e73-8c5f-3cffae2b3db5_1066x718.png

    https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F2030c2f9-c6e0-43a6-869b-6da3f71e0ee7_1066x718.png

    https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F12152984-8da5-4bfe-b593-58788d720c35_1066x718.png

    https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F0904bd02-9df7-4613-95c4-1a13077eaf29_1066x718.png

    https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F844a94b2-4bc9-466a-8bb0-50cabbf8a1a4_1066x718.png

    https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F9ec179a7-2499-4331-9fb8-72a9eef23d7e_1066x718.png

    https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fb5be2e9a-c192-44bd-bd23-2309d3d72115_1066x718.png

    https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fd851cb12-2dcd-4dac-853b-ea322872d321_1066x718.png

    I deeply regret that we don't live in a world where we can see what human accomplishment in Eastern Europe would have looked like without both Communism and Nazism, though.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @LondonBob, @songbird

    , @Sean
    @Dmitry

    De Maistre found to his horror in the salons of St Petersburg, that instead of social hierarchy and the strong hand of law, the fashionable etherealities of French revolutionary philosophy he was fleeing had been taken up by the Russian intelligentsia.


    http://www.martin-van-creveld.com/2336-2/
    While it is always possible to find precedents—going back, in this ease, to the great 17th-century Cossack revolt against Poland/Lithuania {I've read it was against the arrendator Jews of the Polish lords Sean}—Ukrainian nationalism is mainly a product of the nineteenth century when country’s western provinces were strongly influenced by the Austrian empire. Much later this fact enabled Russian President Vladimir Putin to claim that it was not a native movement but an imported one..

    In Ukraine as in other countries, initially nationalism was generated by a tiny urban elite of highly cultured literati by no means representative of the people as a whole. In Ukraine as in other countries, members of this elite sometimes went to the countryside in the hope of discovering and preserving “aboriginal” and “pure” traditions in which to anchor their views. In Ukraine as in other countries, some such traditions were invented almost ex nihil. Old or new, they provided people—mainly Russians, Ukrainians, and Poles—with additional reasons for fighting each other tooth and nail; nowhere more so than in the “Bloodlands” (historian Timothy D. Snyder) of Eastern Europe.

    On the other hand, many famous “Ukrainian” (in the sense that they were born in Ukraine) writers actually wrote in Russian. Nikolai Gogol, the best-known “Ukrainian” writer of all, was born in Sorochyntsi, a Cossack village in what is now Ukraine’s Poltava Oblast, but wrote in Russian. The same applied to Anna Akhmatova and Isaac Babel (both from Odessa) and Mikhail Bulgakov (from Kiev). This list could easily be extended
     

    Replies: @Dmitry, @AP

  209. @Yahya
    @Ivashka the fool

    Prigozhin would be suicidal to agree to a truce/withdrawal.

    He needs to finish the task, or he is finished.

    Putin & co will slowly strangle his organization by depriving them of resources and recruitment.

    You can’t walk back a coup attempt and expect everything to continue as normal.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @24th Alabama, @Wokechoke

    He’s a Jew. He’s been promoted by the likes of the BBC and CNN or our own JJ and been found out. Banishing a Jew to the Pale is pretty good Kek.

    • Replies: @Matra
    @Wokechoke

    He’s a Jew. He’s been promoted by the likes of the BBC and CNN

    I saw part of a BBC report on Prigozhin on Friday and he was portrayed as a monster. Lots of talk about sledgehammers and the like. Didn't Putin himself promote him? Putin likes Jews. It's also funny how so many on the Dissident Right who cheered on Wagner for the last year suddenly discovered that their founder is a Jew just in the last two days.

    Replies: @Wokechoke

  210. S says:

    Provided this arrangement of Lukashenko’s for Prigozhin is not in reality a short term truce for both sides, or, a ruse of some kind, where the rest of what I say here won’t matter, I seriously doubt this is the last we have of heard of Prigozhin.

    Too much has been invested in this guy.

    We have the example of Hitler and Napoleon, each of whom was ‘exiled’ for a time, Hitler to prison after his failed Beer Hall Putsch, and Napoleon to an island after his wartime defeats on the continent, where each made a spectacular come back.

    Prigozhin would seem to be in a better position than either of those two, however, as he wasn’t defeated in battle per se, as they were, but freely chose to stand down. With his men only 120 miles from Moscow, it seems only the physical well being of Putin stood between Prigozhin and his taking power in Russia.

    If only something had happened to Putin during Prigozhin’s ‘March on Moscow’…

    Ultimately, the events of the past couple of days regarding Prigozhin and his Wagnerites may prove in effect to have been a practice dry run and template for the succesful real thing to come. [Or, perhaps more likely, provided Prigozhin is not stripped of his Rusfed political rights, or, is granted a pardon, like Hitler before him, Prigozhin the ‘former warlord’ and newly minted ‘democrat’ may foreswear military coups, and win power ‘democratically’ at the ballot box, his Wagner veterans being newly employed for his campaign as election workers, perhaps even in 2024.]

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @S

    An important detail of today's events: there are rumors that the negotiations between Prigozhin and the Kremlins have been carried by Lukashenka. But supposedly the man on the ground, meeting with Prigozhin in person was Dyumin.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aleksey_Dyumin

    Although Dyumin has denounced these rumors, it might still be the case, with him preferring this to be ignored. Dyumin was on the shortlist of the three potential heirs to RusFed presidency. He is on good terms with Lukashenka too. If he had indeed played a role in resolving this conflict, then he has climbed a couple of the steps closer to replacing Putin in 2024.

    Once Putin retired, Prigozhin might come back.

    And if Utkin/Wagner has really streamlined the transfer of power through his actions, then he has confirmed his title of Hero of Russia. If what I wrote above is true then he did the right thing.

    Replies: @S

    , @Wokechoke
    @S

    He’s a Jew. He’s going to be killed now.

    Replies: @QCIC

  211. @Wokechoke
    @Mr. Hack

    Russian banishes the evil Jew to the Pripet Marshes. Awesome.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

    [MORE]

    Banishment to the Pipyet Marshes….

  212. @Ivashka the fool
    @24th Alabama

    RusFed is not a Kingdom, not even a honest dictatorship. It is a KGB + Noviop cooperative. That's the way it started years ago at the Ozero gated community in Leningrad region, and that's the way it still is today. If enough cooperative members vouched for the Kosher Cook then he might feel reassured that the RusFed Coop manager en chef would not move against him. Lukashenko is a very important Coop member, when a few years ago Luka had a show off with Pynya about Ural Kalyi and its Belarusian branch, the Belarusian KGB humiliated RusFed-ian FSB, while Pynya swallowed. Luka is not a joker like Pynya is.

    BTW, speaking of Pynya, a funny thing happened a couple of days ago, it seems that he acquired the magic skill of ubiquity. He was reported by the official site of RusFed-ian presidential administration as being present at two different events at nearly the same time, which would be impossible given that they are at least half an hour drive from each other. The first event was a strategic council meeting that was probably due to last at least half an hour. But he was also announced as laying a wreath of flowers at some monument. At the second event he was filmed and shown on TV. If we add that there was an occasion where Putin forgot that he spoke German, another one when he had a hard time riding a horse and another one where he said that he served in the Marine Infantry, which he never did, it all becomes quite peculiar. Basically, people are starting to wonder how many "Putins" are there in RusFed and which one of them is the original one if any.

    Perhaps that's why the Kosher Cook has literally called him an old f☆ck (старый муд☆к) not so long ago. He wouldn't have spoken that way of a Dreadful Dictator and repeated Times Magazine Man of the Year that the West has carried in its imagination for a couple of decades already. But he could say that of an aging actor and his colleagues trying the best they can to impersonate an aging Coop manager...

    Replies: @QCIC, @24th Alabama

    At one point I saw some intriguing photos of a suspected Biden double. Also at least one for Hillary on a minor speech after she had turned into the walking dead while campaigning against Trump.

    With modern surgery and make-up body doubles may be more common than we realize. My understanding is they have long been used to stand in for dangerous public appearances. This was discussed a bit during the Gulf War when they were searching for Saddam.

    I wonder if Putin’s doubles are tall enough to make JJ happy?

    • Agree: Ivashka the fool
    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @QCIC

    These rumors about Putin's doubles have been around for years. Of course it is probably just a conspiracy theory, but Putin is growing old and he changed a lot in the last few years. So perhaps there is some truth about it.

    If Dyumin becomes the next President of Russia, then perhaps it will difficult to keep writing about the Evil Dictator Dwarf. Dyumin is rather tall.

    https://region.center/photoreports/2f7c3229ea4e4934354b719375cf4138.jpg

    I have written a couple of years ago that he was probably the better among the heirs apparent to succeed to Putin. Another one was Vorobyov, the governor of the Moscow region, who is on close terms with Kadyrov and was also a protégé of Shoigu. Given what happened today, Dyumin has probably now a better chance and becoming the next leader. The third one is Kiryenko, but given his Jewish background and his younger years interest in Scientology, he is probably not even close to match Dyumin and Vorobyov in potential popularity. Anyway, Kiryenko would make an excellent prime minister or chief of Presidential Administration.

    So yeah, perhaps what we saw today was the operation to ensure the transfer of power towards Dyumin. That would be a most welcome development for all Russophiles.

    Replies: @AP, @QCIC

  213. @S
    Provided this arrangement of Lukashenko's for Prigozhin is not in reality a short term truce for both sides, or, a ruse of some kind, where the rest of what I say here won't matter, I seriously doubt this is the last we have of heard of Prigozhin.

    Too much has been invested in this guy.

    We have the example of Hitler and Napoleon, each of whom was 'exiled' for a time, Hitler to prison after his failed Beer Hall Putsch, and Napoleon to an island after his wartime defeats on the continent, where each made a spectacular come back.

    Prigozhin would seem to be in a better position than either of those two, however, as he wasn't defeated in battle per se, as they were, but freely chose to stand down. With his men only 120 miles from Moscow, it seems only the physical well being of Putin stood between Prigozhin and his taking power in Russia.

    If only something had happened to Putin during Prigozhin's 'March on Moscow'...

    Ultimately, the events of the past couple of days regarding Prigozhin and his Wagnerites may prove in effect to have been a practice dry run and template for the succesful real thing to come. [Or, perhaps more likely, provided Prigozhin is not stripped of his Rusfed political rights, or, is granted a pardon, like Hitler before him, Prigozhin the 'former warlord' and newly minted 'democrat' may foreswear military coups, and win power 'democratically' at the ballot box, his Wagner veterans being newly employed for his campaign as election workers, perhaps even in 2024.]

    https://allthatsinteresting.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/hitler-election-posters.jpg

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Wokechoke

    An important detail of today’s events: there are rumors that the negotiations between Prigozhin and the Kremlins have been carried by Lukashenka. But supposedly the man on the ground, meeting with Prigozhin in person was Dyumin.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aleksey_Dyumin

    Although Dyumin has denounced these rumors, it might still be the case, with him preferring this to be ignored. Dyumin was on the shortlist of the three potential heirs to RusFed presidency. He is on good terms with Lukashenka too. If he had indeed played a role in resolving this conflict, then he has climbed a couple of the steps closer to replacing Putin in 2024.

    Once Putin retired, Prigozhin might come back.

    And if Utkin/Wagner has really streamlined the transfer of power through his actions, then he has confirmed his title of Hero of Russia. If what I wrote above is true then he did the right thing.

    • Replies: @S
    @Ivashka the fool

    Thanks for that about Dyumin. I was not aware of him.

    It's not an exaggeration in any way to say the events of the past few days have been quite intriguing.

  214. I’m trying to imagine a Western government “cutting a deal” with a mutinous general.

    The idea is preposterous.

    Russia is an odd country by European standards.

    Not really a nation-state, but a fiefdom ruled by a network of oligarchs.

    More entertaining, at least.

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @Yahya

    Russia is not an European country. It is an Eurasian country. And Europe is not a continent, but a peninsula of the Eurasian landmass. Russia is bigger than Europea and if it wouldn't have fallen under the Judeo-Bolshevik and the Noviop subjugation, it would be even larger today and way more populous than the whole of Europe as well. The twentieth century was tragic for the Russian people, but if Putin leaves the stage and someone better finally replaces him, then there is still hope for better days. Insha'Allah as they say in your country.

    Replies: @Yahya

    , @Dmitry
    @Yahya

    It's similar like many countries in the world, e.g. as in Egypt. What happens for Mubarak in 2011 and el-Sisi in 2014?

    Europe was also like this before the 18th century, when it was still ruled by these kind of mafia groups which even inherited power to their children. Even Mubarak and probably Putin cannot attain the nepotism of the pre-modern times.

    It's not even "more entertaining", as it's like any mafia zone, most of the time you don't see anything. Even the power of the mafia groups prevents small crimes.

    Just sometimes there is instability between the elites and there is more public the conflicts, which are usually hidden. When the elite is changing or conflict in the elite is becoming significant, there are the times when instability is not hidden.

    In Russia, most of the time everything is quite calm externally, so the government can almost perform a kind of fake theatre or simulation of Europe. For the second half of the 20th century until the 1980s, in a lot of the USSR it was more calm externally than America.

    Remember, in America after 1960s there were many civil rights movement, anti-war protests, riots in Los Angeles. While in important cities of the Soviet Union in the 1960s and 1970s, it was very calm water on the surface.

    Replies: @Yahya

  215. @Wokechoke
    @Yahya

    He’s a Jew. He’s been promoted by the likes of the BBC and CNN or our own JJ and been found out. Banishing a Jew to the Pale is pretty good Kek.

    Replies: @Matra

    He’s a Jew. He’s been promoted by the likes of the BBC and CNN

    I saw part of a BBC report on Prigozhin on Friday and he was portrayed as a monster. Lots of talk about sledgehammers and the like. Didn’t Putin himself promote him? Putin likes Jews. It’s also funny how so many on the Dissident Right who cheered on Wagner for the last year suddenly discovered that their founder is a Jew just in the last two days.

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @Matra

    The press gives oxygen and it takes oxygen.

    I’ve reviewed a few of these apparently investigative styles of documentaries about Wagner. At this point and can only conclude that the western press was promoting Prigozhid to succeed Putin. Dig deep enough and you see Wagner is essentially a massive Geological Survey Mining Drilling Corporation with a militia. Prigozhin shows up in the western press in the fall of 2022 and it’s transparently obvious the western governments saw him as a prospect to be claimed.
    Anglin justifiably ignored the character.


    Bakhmut may have even been a conduit for subsidies to Prigozhid to overthrow Putin.it was such a weird battle into which an awful lot of NATO material and treasure vanished into smoke.

  216. @QCIC
    @Ivashka the fool

    At one point I saw some intriguing photos of a suspected Biden double. Also at least one for Hillary on a minor speech after she had turned into the walking dead while campaigning against Trump.

    With modern surgery and make-up body doubles may be more common than we realize. My understanding is they have long been used to stand in for dangerous public appearances. This was discussed a bit during the Gulf War when they were searching for Saddam.

    I wonder if Putin's doubles are tall enough to make JJ happy?

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

    These rumors about Putin’s doubles have been around for years. Of course it is probably just a conspiracy theory, but Putin is growing old and he changed a lot in the last few years. So perhaps there is some truth about it.

    If Dyumin becomes the next President of Russia, then perhaps it will difficult to keep writing about the Evil Dictator Dwarf. Dyumin is rather tall.

    I have written a couple of years ago that he was probably the better among the heirs apparent to succeed to Putin. Another one was Vorobyov, the governor of the Moscow region, who is on close terms with Kadyrov and was also a protégé of Shoigu. Given what happened today, Dyumin has probably now a better chance and becoming the next leader. The third one is Kiryenko, but given his Jewish background and his younger years interest in Scientology, he is probably not even close to match Dyumin and Vorobyov in potential popularity. Anyway, Kiryenko would make an excellent prime minister or chief of Presidential Administration.

    So yeah, perhaps what we saw today was the operation to ensure the transfer of power towards Dyumin. That would be a most welcome development for all Russophiles.

    • Replies: @AP
    @Ivashka the fool

    What would Dyumin mean for the war against Ukraine?

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

    , @QCIC
    @Ivashka the fool

    Do you think Shoigu will be forced to resign over Prigozhin's harsh criticism?

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

  217. @Yahya
    I’m trying to imagine a Western government “cutting a deal” with a mutinous general.

    The idea is preposterous.

    Russia is an odd country by European standards.

    Not really a nation-state, but a fiefdom ruled by a network of oligarchs.

    More entertaining, at least.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Dmitry

    Russia is not an European country. It is an Eurasian country. And Europe is not a continent, but a peninsula of the Eurasian landmass. Russia is bigger than Europea and if it wouldn’t have fallen under the Judeo-Bolshevik and the Noviop subjugation, it would be even larger today and way more populous than the whole of Europe as well. The twentieth century was tragic for the Russian people, but if Putin leaves the stage and someone better finally replaces him, then there is still hope for better days. Insha’Allah as they say in your country.

    • Replies: @Yahya
    @Ivashka the fool


    someone better finally replaces him
     
    Who might that be?

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

  218. @Matra
    @Wokechoke

    He’s a Jew. He’s been promoted by the likes of the BBC and CNN

    I saw part of a BBC report on Prigozhin on Friday and he was portrayed as a monster. Lots of talk about sledgehammers and the like. Didn't Putin himself promote him? Putin likes Jews. It's also funny how so many on the Dissident Right who cheered on Wagner for the last year suddenly discovered that their founder is a Jew just in the last two days.

    Replies: @Wokechoke

    The press gives oxygen and it takes oxygen.

    I’ve reviewed a few of these apparently investigative styles of documentaries about Wagner. At this point and can only conclude that the western press was promoting Prigozhid to succeed Putin. Dig deep enough and you see Wagner is essentially a massive Geological Survey Mining Drilling Corporation with a militia. Prigozhin shows up in the western press in the fall of 2022 and it’s transparently obvious the western governments saw him as a prospect to be claimed.
    Anglin justifiably ignored the character.

    Bakhmut may have even been a conduit for subsidies to Prigozhid to overthrow Putin.it was such a weird battle into which an awful lot of NATO material and treasure vanished into smoke.

  219. @Ivashka the fool
    @Yahya

    Russia is not an European country. It is an Eurasian country. And Europe is not a continent, but a peninsula of the Eurasian landmass. Russia is bigger than Europea and if it wouldn't have fallen under the Judeo-Bolshevik and the Noviop subjugation, it would be even larger today and way more populous than the whole of Europe as well. The twentieth century was tragic for the Russian people, but if Putin leaves the stage and someone better finally replaces him, then there is still hope for better days. Insha'Allah as they say in your country.

    Replies: @Yahya

    someone better finally replaces him

    Who might that be?

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @Yahya

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aleksey_Dyumin

    I wish he was the man. To understand why, see my comments about the role he might have played in the resolution of today's crisis and also his status vs the other potential heirs to VVP.

    Also if what I think is true, then Dima Utkin (Wagner) did nothing wrong...

  220. @S
    Provided this arrangement of Lukashenko's for Prigozhin is not in reality a short term truce for both sides, or, a ruse of some kind, where the rest of what I say here won't matter, I seriously doubt this is the last we have of heard of Prigozhin.

    Too much has been invested in this guy.

    We have the example of Hitler and Napoleon, each of whom was 'exiled' for a time, Hitler to prison after his failed Beer Hall Putsch, and Napoleon to an island after his wartime defeats on the continent, where each made a spectacular come back.

    Prigozhin would seem to be in a better position than either of those two, however, as he wasn't defeated in battle per se, as they were, but freely chose to stand down. With his men only 120 miles from Moscow, it seems only the physical well being of Putin stood between Prigozhin and his taking power in Russia.

    If only something had happened to Putin during Prigozhin's 'March on Moscow'...

    Ultimately, the events of the past couple of days regarding Prigozhin and his Wagnerites may prove in effect to have been a practice dry run and template for the succesful real thing to come. [Or, perhaps more likely, provided Prigozhin is not stripped of his Rusfed political rights, or, is granted a pardon, like Hitler before him, Prigozhin the 'former warlord' and newly minted 'democrat' may foreswear military coups, and win power 'democratically' at the ballot box, his Wagner veterans being newly employed for his campaign as election workers, perhaps even in 2024.]

    https://allthatsinteresting.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/hitler-election-posters.jpg

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Wokechoke

    He’s a Jew. He’s going to be killed now.

    • Replies: @QCIC
    @Wokechoke

    Ha, ha. Will retire to Israel.

    Replies: @Wokechoke

  221. @Yahya
    I’m trying to imagine a Western government “cutting a deal” with a mutinous general.

    The idea is preposterous.

    Russia is an odd country by European standards.

    Not really a nation-state, but a fiefdom ruled by a network of oligarchs.

    More entertaining, at least.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Dmitry

    It’s similar like many countries in the world, e.g. as in Egypt. What happens for Mubarak in 2011 and el-Sisi in 2014?

    Europe was also like this before the 18th century, when it was still ruled by these kind of mafia groups which even inherited power to their children. Even Mubarak and probably Putin cannot attain the nepotism of the pre-modern times.

    It’s not even “more entertaining”, as it’s like any mafia zone, most of the time you don’t see anything. Even the power of the mafia groups prevents small crimes.

    Just sometimes there is instability between the elites and there is more public the conflicts, which are usually hidden. When the elite is changing or conflict in the elite is becoming significant, there are the times when instability is not hidden.

    In Russia, most of the time everything is quite calm externally, so the government can almost perform a kind of fake theatre or simulation of Europe. For the second half of the 20th century until the 1980s, in a lot of the USSR it was more calm externally than America.

    Remember, in America after 1960s there were many civil rights movement, anti-war protests, riots in Los Angeles. While in important cities of the Soviet Union in the 1960s and 1970s, it was very calm water on the surface.

    • Replies: @Yahya
    @Dmitry


    It’s similar like many countries in the world, e.g. as in Egypt. What happens for Mubarak in 2011 and el-Sisi in 2014?
     
    Yeah, that’s my point. Russian governmental structure is more like an Oriental country than a European one. Strange when a European phenotype is matched with Oriental behavior.

    But I suppose this peculiar “Asiatic” character of Russia has been commented on throughout the ages. Reminds me of Sukorov’s Russian Ark where he has the Marquis de Cuistine opine that “In Asia they love their tyrants. The more tyrannical, the more his memory is cherished. Alexander, Timur and Peter”.

    I think Ivashka’s “Eurasian” attribution probably reflects reality the best. Mixing elements of both, though from afar it seems to tilt European.


    t’s not even “more entertaining”, as it’s like any mafia zone, most of the time you don’t see anything.
     
    Yeah well I still think it’s an entertaining country. More interesting than a well-oiled machine like Australia or Switzerland.

    Replies: @Dmitry

  222. @Ivashka the fool
    @QCIC

    These rumors about Putin's doubles have been around for years. Of course it is probably just a conspiracy theory, but Putin is growing old and he changed a lot in the last few years. So perhaps there is some truth about it.

    If Dyumin becomes the next President of Russia, then perhaps it will difficult to keep writing about the Evil Dictator Dwarf. Dyumin is rather tall.

    https://region.center/photoreports/2f7c3229ea4e4934354b719375cf4138.jpg

    I have written a couple of years ago that he was probably the better among the heirs apparent to succeed to Putin. Another one was Vorobyov, the governor of the Moscow region, who is on close terms with Kadyrov and was also a protégé of Shoigu. Given what happened today, Dyumin has probably now a better chance and becoming the next leader. The third one is Kiryenko, but given his Jewish background and his younger years interest in Scientology, he is probably not even close to match Dyumin and Vorobyov in potential popularity. Anyway, Kiryenko would make an excellent prime minister or chief of Presidential Administration.

    So yeah, perhaps what we saw today was the operation to ensure the transfer of power towards Dyumin. That would be a most welcome development for all Russophiles.

    Replies: @AP, @QCIC

    What would Dyumin mean for the war against Ukraine?

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @AP

    Read my comment above about the nuclear weapons base (Blagoveshhensk 45) that Wagnerites were close to seize or have perhaps even entered. Nuclear security is way more important than anything else. The G7 had a number of video-calls today. They should understand by now that in the case of an outright unraveling of RusFed, it would be impossible to guarantee the non proliferation and secure the strategic weapons. Therefore, they must understand now that RusFed is not to be pressured to the very end.

    Obama has spoken yesterday and said that Crimea annexation had some justification to it after all. I don't think most Ukrainians really want to bring back Donbass into the fold. Therefore, Donbass and Crimea might be ceded to RusFed.

    But there's the problem of Putin and his hawkish circle. These people are mostly old. They should retire, but they can't because they are afraid that they will be transferred to the ICC like Miloshevich. Someone must guarantee them that it will never happen.

    Dyumin comes across as this kind of man, he was a very calm and dutiful person in Putin's service, he is well educated and is a healthy and successful man. He would be a good leader. But he lacked the military force that Vorobyov might have gotten from Kadyrov and he had none to stand for him against Zolotov's Guard. Now, if today's events are really as I think they are, he will have the support of the Wagnerites and also Lukashenka.

    He might then push to the exit the old Noviop circle, guarantee their immunity and safety and then work to stop the war that Ukraine cannot win without NATO's help. A help that will probably now be reduced, because nobody wants RusFed unraveling and some Wagnerites or Russian Nationalists holding Sarmat missiles and blackmailing EU and the International Community the way Norks are doing it. So everything could be blamed on Putin and his circle, and we might move on from all this mess towards something manageable.

    Basically it would mean that Ukraine would receive RusFed-ian seized moneys to rebuild, Crimea and Donbass would be ceded to Russia. Ukraine might then be accepted into NATO and offered a (long) path towards EU integration. Russia would have its new regions to rebuild without any external help which will be a substantial drawback on its progress towards any eventual superpower status, but it would need no more to depend on Chinese good will and might be slowly brought closer into the Western Globalist fold.

    It would be the equivalent of the Finland - Soviet winter war.

    Each side would have made sacrifices and each side would have something to show as a consolation prize.

    Replies: @AP

  223. @Wokechoke
    @S

    He’s a Jew. He’s going to be killed now.

    Replies: @QCIC

    Ha, ha. Will retire to Israel.

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @QCIC

    I suspect he is going to be killed. This was a planned insurrection, Prigozhid was expecting the Leopards in Melitopol by now. That’s not a realistic goal for the Ukies or NATO now. He’d have been found out colluding with Zelenskyy, so the Jew just went ahead with the plan anyway.

    Replies: @QCIC

  224. Some words of wisdom from Machiavelli:

    [MORE]

    Hence we may learn the lesson that on seizing a state, the usurper should make haste to inflict what injuries he must, at a stroke, that he may not have to renew them daily, but be enabled by their discontinuance to reassure men’s minds, and afterwards win them over by benefits. Whosoever, either through timidity or from following bad counsels, adopts a contrary course, must keep the sword always drawn, and can put no trust in his subjects, who suffering from continued and constantly renewed severities, will never yield him their confidence. Injuries, therefore, should be inflicted all at once, that their ill savour being less lasting may the less offend; whereas, benefits should be conferred little by little, that so they may be more fully relished.

    ———

    I say then that the arms wherewith a Prince defends his State are either his own subjects, or they are mercenaries, or they are auxiliaries, or they are partly one and partly another. Mercenaries and auxiliaries are at once useless and dangerous, and he who holds his State by means of mercenary troops can never be solidly or securely seated. For such troops are disunited, ambitious, insubordinate, treacherous, insolent among friends, cowardly before foes, and without fear of God or faith with man. Whenever they are attacked defeat follows; so that in peace you are plundered by them, in war by your enemies.

    ———

    If we look for the causes which first led to the overthrow of the Roman Empire, they will be found to have had their source in the employment of Gothic mercenaries, for from that hour the strength of the Romans began to wane and all the virtue which went from them passed to the Goths. And, to be brief, I say that without national arms no Princedom is safe, but on the contrary is wholly dependent on Fortune, being without the strength that could defend it in adversity. And it has always been the deliberate opinion of the wise, that nothing is so infirm and fleeting as a reputation for power not founded upon a national army, by which I mean one composed of subjects, citizens, and dependents, all others being mercenary or auxiliary.

    ———

    Unreflecting writers, indeed, while they praise his achievements, have condemned the chief cause of them; but that his other merits would not by themselves have been so efficacious we may see from the case of Scipio, one of the greatest Captains, not of his own time only but of all times of which we have record, whose armies rose against him in Spain from no other cause than his too great leniency in allowing them a freedom inconsistent with military strictness. With which weakness Fabius Maximus taxed him in the Senate House, calling him the corrupter of the Roman soldiery.

  225. @QCIC
    @Wokechoke

    Ha, ha. Will retire to Israel.

    Replies: @Wokechoke

    I suspect he is going to be killed. This was a planned insurrection, Prigozhid was expecting the Leopards in Melitopol by now. That’s not a realistic goal for the Ukies or NATO now. He’d have been found out colluding with Zelenskyy, so the Jew just went ahead with the plan anyway.

    • Replies: @QCIC
    @Wokechoke

    I think the whole thing was staged with Putin's approval. The Prigozhin Act had a long build up during which he could have been reassigned for "health reasons" at will if he were actually freelancing.

    Has VVP given any press conferences on the Wagner "putsch"? If so, how did his poker face look?

    Replies: @Greasy William, @Wokechoke

  226. @Ivashka the fool
    @QCIC

    These rumors about Putin's doubles have been around for years. Of course it is probably just a conspiracy theory, but Putin is growing old and he changed a lot in the last few years. So perhaps there is some truth about it.

    If Dyumin becomes the next President of Russia, then perhaps it will difficult to keep writing about the Evil Dictator Dwarf. Dyumin is rather tall.

    https://region.center/photoreports/2f7c3229ea4e4934354b719375cf4138.jpg

    I have written a couple of years ago that he was probably the better among the heirs apparent to succeed to Putin. Another one was Vorobyov, the governor of the Moscow region, who is on close terms with Kadyrov and was also a protégé of Shoigu. Given what happened today, Dyumin has probably now a better chance and becoming the next leader. The third one is Kiryenko, but given his Jewish background and his younger years interest in Scientology, he is probably not even close to match Dyumin and Vorobyov in potential popularity. Anyway, Kiryenko would make an excellent prime minister or chief of Presidential Administration.

    So yeah, perhaps what we saw today was the operation to ensure the transfer of power towards Dyumin. That would be a most welcome development for all Russophiles.

    Replies: @AP, @QCIC

    Do you think Shoigu will be forced to resign over Prigozhin’s harsh criticism?

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @QCIC

    There are rumors that Shoigu has been arrested and will be sacked for incompetence. Difficult to know if it is true.

  227. Suspect that the real reason GR disdains the Greco-Roman agricultural writers is that he sees limited applicability in his own climatic zone.

    Has he considered, though, that both Aristotle and Virgil (who was born in Padua) gave very good advice about feeding salted herbage to milch cows? And what is true of milk must be true of manure?

    • Replies: @songbird
    @songbird

    But I do think it is interesting to read descriptions of old breeds.

    Seems like varieties of cattle go back a ways. Egyptians depicted at least two breeds.

    IIRC, the movie Braveheart featured some cattle bred to have more traditional features. But I am uncertain to what extent they really resembled old cattle and what range of breeds are represented in such programs. I'd like to see them expanded and archeo DNA used.

    Supposedly, before the Normans arrived, most sheep in Ireland were black.

  228. @Wokechoke
    @QCIC

    I suspect he is going to be killed. This was a planned insurrection, Prigozhid was expecting the Leopards in Melitopol by now. That’s not a realistic goal for the Ukies or NATO now. He’d have been found out colluding with Zelenskyy, so the Jew just went ahead with the plan anyway.

    Replies: @QCIC

    I think the whole thing was staged with Putin’s approval. The Prigozhin Act had a long build up during which he could have been reassigned for “health reasons” at will if he were actually freelancing.

    Has VVP given any press conferences on the Wagner “putsch”? If so, how did his poker face look?

    • Replies: @Greasy William
    @QCIC

    The coup was definitely for real and almost certainly planned with the CIA and co but it flopped and the end result is going to be to further consolidate the Putin regime while also making it more paranoid, aggressive and dangerous.

    The biggest short term problem is that all the Westtards are going to use this as cope to distract from the failure of the suicide offensive they forced the Ukrainians to carry out

    Replies: @QCIC

    , @Wokechoke
    @QCIC

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7xeanrPkyF4

    Never Mind The Buzzcocks…it was a Jew Coup.

    Replies: @QCIC

  229. @QCIC
    @Wokechoke

    I think the whole thing was staged with Putin's approval. The Prigozhin Act had a long build up during which he could have been reassigned for "health reasons" at will if he were actually freelancing.

    Has VVP given any press conferences on the Wagner "putsch"? If so, how did his poker face look?

    Replies: @Greasy William, @Wokechoke

    The coup was definitely for real and almost certainly planned with the CIA and co but it flopped and the end result is going to be to further consolidate the Putin regime while also making it more paranoid, aggressive and dangerous.

    The biggest short term problem is that all the Westtards are going to use this as cope to distract from the failure of the suicide offensive they forced the Ukrainians to carry out

    • Replies: @QCIC
    @Greasy William

    Did this coup have any chance of working or was it just a diversion of some sort, with Prigozhin and his chumps as pawns?

    If I understood his brief comment, Martyanov suggested something along the lines that Wagner may have been poised to turn against Russian forces from behind during a successful Ukrainian counter-attack, but since that counter-attack failed Wagner was left twisting in the wind. This actually sounds slightly less crazy than driving a handful of tanks toward Moscow to threaten your own people.

    Maybe the Kremlin played Prigozhin this entire time since they were not strong enough politically to stop the factions that supported him? I thought he and VVP had a 'bond'.

    Was the West planning to detonate a nuke in Moscow and blame it on one Russian faction or another? Use this crisis to pull out the stops and perform a real coup in Russia?

  230. @Greasy William
    @Beckow

    Russia still had a fair degree of power over Ukraine post 2014. A huge chunk of the Ukrainian population were Russian sympathizers, Russia had influence over/contacts with some Ukrainian politicians and there was always the possibility that Russia could just annex Ukraine entirely if Russia was pushed too far.

    Although you may deny it, everyone knows that Russia's goal was to ultimately return to at least the pre 2005 situation, if not fully formally absorb Ukraine (the latter being more likely, in my view). All that is gone now. Russia can still annihilate Ukraine, but only at the cost of starting WWIII.

    From an anti US position, this war has worked out great. From a Russian nationalist position, not so much. Hence Strelkov's bottomless rage

    Replies: @Beckow

    …Russia still had a fair degree of power over Ukraine post 2014.

    Not in any meaningful sense. You can argue that post 2022 the residual support for Russia in Ukraine further dropped. But the pre-2022 Ukraine was already a militantly anti-Russian state and any pro-Russian sentiments were brutally suppressed (Odessa 2014…). So the gain for the pro-Western Ukies is largely illusory.

    Your claim that the war created an “independent Ukraine” makes no sense – it is a slogan. You can feel that way, but for an objective observer it is nonsense. If anything, today’s Ukraine is more dependent on its Western sponsors – so its “independence” is less, not more.

    Russia’s goal was to ultimately return to at least the pre 2005 situation, if not fully formally absorb Ukraine…All that is gone now. Russia can still annihilate Ukraine, but only at the cost of starting WWIII.

    And US’s goal is to ultimately control every square inch of the earth’s surface. And UK’s goal is to dismember Russia and make sure that no Russians are left. And my goal is to own all of Europe’s real estate. And your goal is…you see how silly that is? The goals or dreams that you project on the others are neither verifiable nor meaningful. Who knows? At what point? Is “Russia” a person with unchangeable permanent goals? How would that work?

    Russia has been very clear about its goals: no Nato in Ukraine and normal human rights for Russians in Ukraine. Maybe they are lying and the real goal is to conquer everything to Sardinia. But how would that be relevant to the current situation? You and that fellow ‘Strelkov?” can have a nice bitch-fest about it – and it would still mean nothing.

    • Replies: @Greasy William
    @Beckow


    And US’s goal is to ultimately control every square inch of the earth’s surface
     
    This is true. Hence this war is a defeat for the US, like I said.

    And your goal is…you see how silly that is?
     
    My goal is to destroy the United States and take revenge on white liberals. Although I guess that's actually two goals. But it is certainly not silly to believe that is what I want because I myself have repeatedly made as much clear.

    Similarly, everyone who isn't a die hard Russophile understands that the current Russian regime sees Ukraine as an inherent part of the Russian Motherland that was wrongfully torn away. And it is clear that Putin and co have always sought to "reunite" all of the lost "Russian" lands.


    Russia has been very clear about its goals: no Nato in Ukraine and normal human rights for Russians in Ukraine. Maybe they are lying and the real goal is to conquer everything to Sardinia.
     
    They are lying. The goal was and remains to end Ukraine as a nation. They view the Ukrainian state as an illegitimate, colonial Western project meant to weaken and ultimately dismember Russia. If you don't see things that way, fine; you're still wrong, though. Reality is what it is.

    Is “Russia” a person with unchangeable permanent goals?
     
    The Putin regime essentially is. Putin and those around him are practical men. I am certain that they are, or at least were, willing to work with Ukraine/NATO on peaceful solutions for the various disputes regarding Russia/Ukraine. However, they would always see Ukraine to be as illegitimate as China sees Taiwan and Russia would ultimately always be willing to use force to conquer the country as soon as it was practical to do so.

    If your point is that with better statecraft that the US and Ukraine could have prevented this war, I think that you are probably correct. It's also possible that if the war was pushed off long enough, Russia may have eventually changed it's attitude towards Ukraine and true peace based on mutual recognition could have been achieved. But that isn't what we're talking about here.


    You and that fellow ‘Strelkov?” can have a nice bitch-fest about it
     
    Without Strelkov, Ukraine would still control Crimea and the entire Donbas. He isn't just some nobody yapping on the internet. He's a bad guy and I'm certainly not saying he's infallible, but his reading of events shouldn't be summarily dismissed.

    And for the record, when the rest of the pro Russian internet brigade was praising Prigozhin as some super soldier, badass, Russian ultra patriot, Strelkov was sounding the alarm that Prigozhin was actually a loose cannon who was only out for himself. When this coup was launched, Strelkov immediately leapt to the defense of Putin, a man who he despises.

    You are free to ignore what Strelkov says, but you are only doing yourself a disservice.

    Replies: @Beckow, @Wokechoke, @Mr. Hack

  231. @AP
    @Ivashka the fool

    What would Dyumin mean for the war against Ukraine?

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

    Read my comment above about the nuclear weapons base (Blagoveshhensk 45) that Wagnerites were close to seize or have perhaps even entered. Nuclear security is way more important than anything else. The G7 had a number of video-calls today. They should understand by now that in the case of an outright unraveling of RusFed, it would be impossible to guarantee the non proliferation and secure the strategic weapons. Therefore, they must understand now that RusFed is not to be pressured to the very end.

    Obama has spoken yesterday and said that Crimea annexation had some justification to it after all. I don’t think most Ukrainians really want to bring back Donbass into the fold. Therefore, Donbass and Crimea might be ceded to RusFed.

    But there’s the problem of Putin and his hawkish circle. These people are mostly old. They should retire, but they can’t because they are afraid that they will be transferred to the ICC like Miloshevich. Someone must guarantee them that it will never happen.

    Dyumin comes across as this kind of man, he was a very calm and dutiful person in Putin’s service, he is well educated and is a healthy and successful man. He would be a good leader. But he lacked the military force that Vorobyov might have gotten from Kadyrov and he had none to stand for him against Zolotov’s Guard. Now, if today’s events are really as I think they are, he will have the support of the Wagnerites and also Lukashenka.

    He might then push to the exit the old Noviop circle, guarantee their immunity and safety and then work to stop the war that Ukraine cannot win without NATO’s help. A help that will probably now be reduced, because nobody wants RusFed unraveling and some Wagnerites or Russian Nationalists holding Sarmat missiles and blackmailing EU and the International Community the way Norks are doing it. So everything could be blamed on Putin and his circle, and we might move on from all this mess towards something manageable.

    Basically it would mean that Ukraine would receive RusFed-ian seized moneys to rebuild, Crimea and Donbass would be ceded to Russia. Ukraine might then be accepted into NATO and offered a (long) path towards EU integration. Russia would have its new regions to rebuild without any external help which will be a substantial drawback on its progress towards any eventual superpower status, but it would need no more to depend on Chinese good will and might be slowly brought closer into the Western Globalist fold.

    It would be the equivalent of the Finland – Soviet winter war.

    Each side would have made sacrifices and each side would have something to show as a consolation prize.

    • Replies: @AP
    @Ivashka the fool

    How nice this would be…

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

  232. @QCIC
    @Ivashka the fool

    Do you think Shoigu will be forced to resign over Prigozhin's harsh criticism?

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

    There are rumors that Shoigu has been arrested and will be sacked for incompetence. Difficult to know if it is true.

    • Thanks: QCIC
  233. @Mr. XYZ
    @Beckow

    By western Poland, do you mean Danzig and the Polish Corridor?


    But a more interesting point is what would Kiev do with Crimea and Donbas if it would by some miracle get them back. 5-7 million Russians would be expelled? Murdered? Kiev would apply its policy of banning the Russian language and schools in areas that are 80-90% Russian, can you even imagine that?
     
    Give them South Tyrol-style autonomy, no?

    Replies: @Beckow

    …By western Poland, do you mean Danzig and the Polish Corridor?

    No I mean Stettin, Pomerania and Silesia…formerly German. There are Germans who would like to change it. Same as with all border disputes, it is almost never finally settled.

    Give them South Tyrol-style autonomy, no?

    Kiev took away Russian (and Hungarian, Tatar…) as the second language in Ukraine. They refused a Minsk deal with Donbas autonomy. Who would believe them now? That’s not something Zelko&gang are even willing to discuss. Until they lose.

  234. @Yahya
    @Ivashka the fool


    someone better finally replaces him
     
    Who might that be?

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aleksey_Dyumin

    I wish he was the man. To understand why, see my comments about the role he might have played in the resolution of today’s crisis and also his status vs the other potential heirs to VVP.

    Also if what I think is true, then Dima Utkin (Wagner) did nothing wrong…

  235. @John Johnson
    @Beckow

    The giddy excitement that the likes of JJ, AP, Mr. Hacks or you go through at any sign of “good news” betrays your insecurity.

    It is entirely good news for those of us that support Ukraine. What is wrong with being excited about good news?

    This has been an embarrassment for Putin and his US basement defense force.

    Half of them were still holding out for the theory that Prigozhin's insubordinance was all an elaborate 5D chess play.

    Well that is out which means Putin is unable to control him and Bakhmut was never a trap.

    Would have been nice if the dwarf shot it out with brainy orc but this is all still a wonderful development.

    It will still be fun to see how Russian State TV tries to spin this. They have also been promoting the theory that everything has been by Putin's design as if he is Palpatine and we mortals can't comprehend his complex plans.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @Beckow

    Let’s see: large 20k well-armed Wagner army has moved to Belarus. And nobody made a peep…now they will sit on the Ukie northern border, close to Poland and Lithuania if they try to move to Western Ukr. That is what happened – all else looks like theatre and noise. Some actors may even believe that it was real. Do you?

    What are you celebrating? Russia has in a few weeks moved nukes to Belarus and now an army. With Luka-the-tractorist managing it. Three years ago you thought you captured Belarus, you even named some lady as its “president” (where is she now?)…You are really bad at strategy and thinking stuff through. No wonder people walk all over you: goat herders in Kabul, barefoot Vietnam peasants, Caracas bus driver with 90 IQ, and now the tractor driver in Belarus…

  236. @Ivashka the fool
    @S

    An important detail of today's events: there are rumors that the negotiations between Prigozhin and the Kremlins have been carried by Lukashenka. But supposedly the man on the ground, meeting with Prigozhin in person was Dyumin.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aleksey_Dyumin

    Although Dyumin has denounced these rumors, it might still be the case, with him preferring this to be ignored. Dyumin was on the shortlist of the three potential heirs to RusFed presidency. He is on good terms with Lukashenka too. If he had indeed played a role in resolving this conflict, then he has climbed a couple of the steps closer to replacing Putin in 2024.

    Once Putin retired, Prigozhin might come back.

    And if Utkin/Wagner has really streamlined the transfer of power through his actions, then he has confirmed his title of Hero of Russia. If what I wrote above is true then he did the right thing.

    Replies: @S

    Thanks for that about Dyumin. I was not aware of him.

    It’s not an exaggeration in any way to say the events of the past few days have been quite intriguing.

  237. @QCIC
    @Wokechoke

    I think the whole thing was staged with Putin's approval. The Prigozhin Act had a long build up during which he could have been reassigned for "health reasons" at will if he were actually freelancing.

    Has VVP given any press conferences on the Wagner "putsch"? If so, how did his poker face look?

    Replies: @Greasy William, @Wokechoke

    Never Mind The Buzzcocks…it was a Jew Coup.

    • Replies: @QCIC
    @Wokechoke

    Maybe so and perhaps we will find out. I always thought Prigozhin looked or seemed untrustworthy, but chalked it up to good casting for his role. Maybe it was the real deal.

  238. @Beckow
    @Greasy William


    ...Russia still had a fair degree of power over Ukraine post 2014.
     
    Not in any meaningful sense. You can argue that post 2022 the residual support for Russia in Ukraine further dropped. But the pre-2022 Ukraine was already a militantly anti-Russian state and any pro-Russian sentiments were brutally suppressed (Odessa 2014...). So the gain for the pro-Western Ukies is largely illusory.

    Your claim that the war created an "independent Ukraine" makes no sense - it is a slogan. You can feel that way, but for an objective observer it is nonsense. If anything, today's Ukraine is more dependent on its Western sponsors - so its "independence" is less, not more.


    Russia’s goal was to ultimately return to at least the pre 2005 situation, if not fully formally absorb Ukraine...All that is gone now. Russia can still annihilate Ukraine, but only at the cost of starting WWIII.
     
    And US's goal is to ultimately control every square inch of the earth's surface. And UK's goal is to dismember Russia and make sure that no Russians are left. And my goal is to own all of Europe's real estate. And your goal is...you see how silly that is? The goals or dreams that you project on the others are neither verifiable nor meaningful. Who knows? At what point? Is "Russia" a person with unchangeable permanent goals? How would that work?

    Russia has been very clear about its goals: no Nato in Ukraine and normal human rights for Russians in Ukraine. Maybe they are lying and the real goal is to conquer everything to Sardinia. But how would that be relevant to the current situation? You and that fellow 'Strelkov?" can have a nice bitch-fest about it - and it would still mean nothing.

    Replies: @Greasy William

    And US’s goal is to ultimately control every square inch of the earth’s surface

    This is true. Hence this war is a defeat for the US, like I said.

    And your goal is…you see how silly that is?

    My goal is to destroy the United States and take revenge on white liberals. Although I guess that’s actually two goals. But it is certainly not silly to believe that is what I want because I myself have repeatedly made as much clear.

    Similarly, everyone who isn’t a die hard Russophile understands that the current Russian regime sees Ukraine as an inherent part of the Russian Motherland that was wrongfully torn away. And it is clear that Putin and co have always sought to “reunite” all of the lost “Russian” lands.

    Russia has been very clear about its goals: no Nato in Ukraine and normal human rights for Russians in Ukraine. Maybe they are lying and the real goal is to conquer everything to Sardinia.

    They are lying. The goal was and remains to end Ukraine as a nation. They view the Ukrainian state as an illegitimate, colonial Western project meant to weaken and ultimately dismember Russia. If you don’t see things that way, fine; you’re still wrong, though. Reality is what it is.

    Is “Russia” a person with unchangeable permanent goals?

    The Putin regime essentially is. Putin and those around him are practical men. I am certain that they are, or at least were, willing to work with Ukraine/NATO on peaceful solutions for the various disputes regarding Russia/Ukraine. However, they would always see Ukraine to be as illegitimate as China sees Taiwan and Russia would ultimately always be willing to use force to conquer the country as soon as it was practical to do so.

    If your point is that with better statecraft that the US and Ukraine could have prevented this war, I think that you are probably correct. It’s also possible that if the war was pushed off long enough, Russia may have eventually changed it’s attitude towards Ukraine and true peace based on mutual recognition could have been achieved. But that isn’t what we’re talking about here.

    You and that fellow ‘Strelkov?” can have a nice bitch-fest about it

    Without Strelkov, Ukraine would still control Crimea and the entire Donbas. He isn’t just some nobody yapping on the internet. He’s a bad guy and I’m certainly not saying he’s infallible, but his reading of events shouldn’t be summarily dismissed.

    And for the record, when the rest of the pro Russian internet brigade was praising Prigozhin as some super soldier, badass, Russian ultra patriot, Strelkov was sounding the alarm that Prigozhin was actually a loose cannon who was only out for himself. When this coup was launched, Strelkov immediately leapt to the defense of Putin, a man who he despises.

    You are free to ignore what Strelkov says, but you are only doing yourself a disservice.

    • Replies: @Beckow
    @Greasy William


    ..The goal was and remains to end Ukraine as a nation.
     
    There is no evidence for it - almost all Russia's actions are way too moderate for that "goal". Your stated goal of "revenge on white liberals" may be how you feel, but I doubt the "liberals" are changing their ways or even taking your "goal" into account. That was my point about these goals in general - they mean almost nothing in reality. But you are free to live in the paranoia.

    Without Strelkov, Ukraine would still control Crimea and the entire Donbas.

     

    An obvious nonsense. Crimea had a large Russian Navy base and 80-90% support for joining Russia, I am not even sure 'Strelkov' was there at the time. In Donbas there were quite a few catalysts, Strelkov being an important one, but it was the defeat of the Ukie invading armies that made Donbas win - the Ukies lost the war in 2014-5.

    I will continue ignoring Strelkov.

    Replies: @Greasy William

    , @Wokechoke
    @Greasy William

    Anyone willing to mention his Jewishness was onto him.

    , @Mr. Hack
    @Greasy William


    They are lying. The goal was and remains to end Ukraine as a nation. They view the Ukrainian state as an illegitimate, colonial Western project meant to weaken and ultimately dismember Russia. If you don’t see things that way, fine; you’re still wrong, though. Reality is what it is...However, they would always see Ukraine to be as illegitimate as China sees Taiwan and Russia would ultimately always be willing to use force to conquer the country as soon as it was practical to do so.
     
    I'm in basic agreement with your here. Most of the readers of this blog don't really understand this, or if they do, they don't really care. So, for Ukrainians, the threat of total annihilation and genocide is very real, and goes a long way in explaining the overall success they've experienced on the battlefield.It's basically a "do or die situation" for Ukrainians. It's heartening to see that at least one non-Ukrainian that takes a part in this blog seems to really understand these things.
  239. @Beckow
    @Greasy William

    To summarize your win-loss argument: Ukraine won intangibles like "freedom" but lost territory, men and resources. Russia won materially, but the loser (Ukraine) now hates them even more.

    Isn't that how most wars end? The winner gets real stuff, but is hated by the losing side who goes on and on about how the fact that they are not dead means that now they are "free". Freedom with less territory and more poverty, with millions who left and infrastructure destroyed. But they will blabber about 'freedom' although in reality nothing in that respect has changed between 2021 and now.

    I also don't understand your point about Ukraine not having "real independence" after Maidan. How could that be? They had about as hostile relations with Russia as is humanly possible, they banned everything from trade to Russian books and statues.

    What was that all about if they were according to you still not truly independent of Russia? When you write absurd stuff like that you frankly sound like a not very smart propagandist. Or maybe just not very smart.

    Replies: @Greasy William, @silviosilver

    Isn’t that how most wars end? The winner gets real stuff, but is hated by the losing side who goes on and on about how the fact that they are not dead means that now they are “free”.

    I can’t think of any wars that ended with the loser pretending that, not being dead, they are now free. Give me an example.

    Freedom with less territory and more poverty, with millions who left and infrastructure destroyed.

    A submaximal territorial footprint, damaged infrastructure, and an (initial) increase in poverty and emigration are not inconsistent with greater freedom. It seems to me that the price all successful liberation movements have paid includes some or all of those factors.

    • Replies: @Beckow
    @silviosilver


    ...any wars that ended with the loser pretending that, not being dead, they are now free.
     
    The understanding of freedom has varied over history, but a few random examples: most failed liberation movements since time immemorial from the Germanics losing to Rome to all Third World liberation movements; US when losing in Vietnam or actually in all of the wars they lost, Paraguay when losing to Brazil-Argentina...and of course all the losing wars that Poland has fought, bloody disasters that spawned an endless but we are free folklore. Look up the rest, it is a very common pattern.

    A submaximal territorial footprint, damaged infrastructure, and an (initial) increase in poverty and emigration are not inconsistent with greater freedom.
     
    Ok, a shrunken country, decades of rebuilding, and people leaving - and not temporarily. Yes, in a way that is what a free country looks like, I like it...:) But the question is how many people will stay to live there given the misery and discomfort, when better life is just across the border in Europe and in Russia. We will see.

    Replies: @silviosilver, @Mr. XYZ

  240. Brothers! I see how the enemies, having divided our people, are preparing a big war for them. And my people are not Russian or Ukrainian. My people are one. And I don’t want to know anything else. As a man, if he does not have an arm or a leg, is considered a cripple, so is a divided people.

    We Russians, Ukrainians, Belarusians are bequeathed to be together. And the fact that today we are mad and hate each other is the main accusation against us – we have violated this covenant.

    What did we lack, brothers? Land? Look how much we have, land. Freedom? So, by killing each other, we became freer?

    What was sacred to everyone, what united and made a single people – the victory over fascism – that’s what divided us. After all, it was precisely the accusations of fascism that became the fuse for the fratricidal war, which was used by the enemies of our people on both sides. So much so that now, neither in Russia nor in Ukraine, people doubt that by killing their brothers, they are fighting against “Russian” and “Ukrainian” fascists.

    Russian politicians and the media are well aware that it’s Jewish oligarchs who stuck Nazi and Bandera paraphernalia on Ukrainian youth. But they stubbornly push the topic of precisely “Ukrainian fascism”. Inciting hatred and further aggravating the conflict

    They humiliate the defenders of Novorossia, they shut up the mouths of commanders and militias with attempts at killing and murders. The militia is an interference for them, because the militia men are waging a meaningful war, and not going to the slaughter like a herd, to which these advisers and curators are constantly pushing us.

    They want to remove the militia as an ideological buffer between the Ukrainian and Russian armies in order to push them directly later. The army is not a militia, they will not ask questions there. They will simply destroy each other without any meaning and purpose

    I fight for the right to speak the truth. Not Russian or Ukrainian, but one for all – about my deceived and divided people. The truth is my last weapon.

    Alexey Mozgdovoy 1975 – 2015

    A simple man, who became a hero in defense of his people and was killed by those who would go on to become known as the Wagner PMC.

  241. @Wokechoke
    @QCIC

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7xeanrPkyF4

    Never Mind The Buzzcocks…it was a Jew Coup.

    Replies: @QCIC

    Maybe so and perhaps we will find out. I always thought Prigozhin looked or seemed untrustworthy, but chalked it up to good casting for his role. Maybe it was the real deal.

  242. @Greasy William
    @QCIC

    The coup was definitely for real and almost certainly planned with the CIA and co but it flopped and the end result is going to be to further consolidate the Putin regime while also making it more paranoid, aggressive and dangerous.

    The biggest short term problem is that all the Westtards are going to use this as cope to distract from the failure of the suicide offensive they forced the Ukrainians to carry out

    Replies: @QCIC

    Did this coup have any chance of working or was it just a diversion of some sort, with Prigozhin and his chumps as pawns?

    If I understood his brief comment, Martyanov suggested something along the lines that Wagner may have been poised to turn against Russian forces from behind during a successful Ukrainian counter-attack, but since that counter-attack failed Wagner was left twisting in the wind. This actually sounds slightly less crazy than driving a handful of tanks toward Moscow to threaten your own people.

    Maybe the Kremlin played Prigozhin this entire time since they were not strong enough politically to stop the factions that supported him? I thought he and VVP had a ‘bond’.

    Was the West planning to detonate a nuke in Moscow and blame it on one Russian faction or another? Use this crisis to pull out the stops and perform a real coup in Russia?

  243. @Dmitry
    @Yahya

    It's similar like many countries in the world, e.g. as in Egypt. What happens for Mubarak in 2011 and el-Sisi in 2014?

    Europe was also like this before the 18th century, when it was still ruled by these kind of mafia groups which even inherited power to their children. Even Mubarak and probably Putin cannot attain the nepotism of the pre-modern times.

    It's not even "more entertaining", as it's like any mafia zone, most of the time you don't see anything. Even the power of the mafia groups prevents small crimes.

    Just sometimes there is instability between the elites and there is more public the conflicts, which are usually hidden. When the elite is changing or conflict in the elite is becoming significant, there are the times when instability is not hidden.

    In Russia, most of the time everything is quite calm externally, so the government can almost perform a kind of fake theatre or simulation of Europe. For the second half of the 20th century until the 1980s, in a lot of the USSR it was more calm externally than America.

    Remember, in America after 1960s there were many civil rights movement, anti-war protests, riots in Los Angeles. While in important cities of the Soviet Union in the 1960s and 1970s, it was very calm water on the surface.

    Replies: @Yahya

    It’s similar like many countries in the world, e.g. as in Egypt. What happens for Mubarak in 2011 and el-Sisi in 2014?

    Yeah, that’s my point. Russian governmental structure is more like an Oriental country than a European one. Strange when a European phenotype is matched with Oriental behavior.

    But I suppose this peculiar “Asiatic” character of Russia has been commented on throughout the ages. Reminds me of Sukorov’s Russian Ark where he has the Marquis de Cuistine opine that “In Asia they love their tyrants. The more tyrannical, the more his memory is cherished. Alexander, Timur and Peter”.

    I think Ivashka’s “Eurasian” attribution probably reflects reality the best. Mixing elements of both, though from afar it seems to tilt European.

    t’s not even “more entertaining”, as it’s like any mafia zone, most of the time you don’t see anything.

    Yeah well I still think it’s an entertaining country. More interesting than a well-oiled machine like Australia or Switzerland.

    • Replies: @Dmitry
    @Yahya


    governmental structure is more like an Oriental country than a European
     
    It's not like an oriental country. Historically it is more like a slave colony like Brazil or antebellum Southern States of the USA,

    Even today, it is not a traditional European country which develops the culture "inhouse". The culture is imported by the international elites.

    Also in Russia, the control of the power, land and resource is important, not the culture which they are often changing. It was originally importing culture from the Byzantine Empire, before Peter already they are importing the culture from Europe.

    But the European culture is often imported as a luxury product for the elite, sometimes it's followed more seriously which was in Soviet times, when because of ideological change of elite they follow the European ideas for managing the country.

    After 1991, it's returned again to importing the European culture as a luxury, not as something they follow seriously for managing the country.


    de Cuistine opine that “In Asia they love their tyrants. The more tyrannical,
     
    It's not true for Asia, unless you refer to parts of the Soviet Union like Turkmenistan. Even China since Mao, is going to collective leadership model, not the autocracy.

    Also the autocracy in the 20th century was a European model in Germany, Italy, Spain, Portugal. If you go to 19th century, it's even France for most of their century.

    While the slave colony, was model of the European countries when they are managing regions outside Europe, like America, Caribbean.

    Until 19th century Russia follows the slave colony model, where the wealthy internationalist elite have a luxury mansion with thousands of souls which cannot escape this small area of land.

    It creates a very luxury lifestyle, which is romanticized by the local versions of European literature. It's similar model to Antebellum Southern States of USA and Brazil in this epoch.

    After 1991, because of the oil and gas money is so large, there is a similar recreation of this lifestyle for people who have control of natural resources.

    This is in postsoviet system doesn't create the wealthy and money for the luxuries, from the slaves or labor. It's from ground under the people.


    Yeah well I still think it’s an entertaining country. More interesting than a well-oiled machine like Australia or Switzerland.

     

    Maybe, if you have a very long life. Political instability is inevitable and also uncommon. It's like earthquakes in Turkey. So, there are some political instability, then a few decades of stabilization where it seems very calm.

    Westerners in 1917, were probably saying "Russia is an entertaining country". Then the government mainly doesn't change across 70 years, except with some modulations around Stalin. It's one of the most stable governments in the world.

    There is instability of 1980s to 1991. But then we have same government since 1991, which is already 32 years. There is just small modifications to the government in 1995, when Yeltsin changes direction, or from 1996 the Saint-Petersburg clique (Putin, Medvedev, Sechin etc) is merging to the Yeltsin government.

    Even if there is some dramatical story like in 1999, when they were "mysterious" bombing residents' buildings in Moscow. In 1979 there was anthrax leak in Sverdlovsk. In 1957, there was nuclear disaster in Ozyorsk.

    The information will not be public unless you wait for the next government, will publicize the information. So, you might wait a few decades, before the information is open. Before then, the information is very opaque..

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

  244. @Ivashka the fool
    @silviosilver


    Erdoğan said he backed the Russian government's handling of a mutiny by the Wagner mercenary army, the Kremlin said in a statement.
    President Erdoğan urged his counterpart to act with common sense and stated that Türkiye was ready to do its part to solve the situation in Russia peacefully as soon as possible.

    https://www.dailysabah.com/politics/diplomacy/president-erdogan-expresses-support-for-putin-against-rebellion

    Iran supports the rule of law in the Russian Federation and considers the latest developments there an internal Russian matter, Iranian state media quoted foreign ministry spokesperson Nasser Kanaani as saying on Saturday.

    https://www.jpost.com/breaking-news/article-747531

     

    Just wait and see.

    I was already right about the Russian Time of Troubles 3.0 (Russian revolution being the 2.0), now you will witness a progressive strengthening of the Islamic Oumma.

    The only force standing in its way in the end would be the Asian Dharmic Civilization.

    European Civilization is dying before our very own eyes.

    You just don't realize it yet.

    Replies: @AP, @silviosilver

    I was already right about the Russian Time of Troubles 3.0 (Russian revolution being the 2.0), now you will witness a progressive strengthening of the Islamic Oumma.

    If you think the two news items you linked are evidence of this, then frankly, you are imagining things. Some analyses miss the forest for trees; you take such a big picture view of the world that you inevitably end up doing the opposite. It’s like taking the fact that I am a ‘racist’ and thinking you can predict when I will replace my washing machine and what brand I will buy.

    Remember, you said: If Shiah and Sunni Muslims can collaborate in the falling RusFed, if Turan and Iran unite their forces, then the future global Caliphate is rapidly becoming inevitable.

    As conjecture, sure, that’s plausible. It’s trying to interpret contemporary events through that prism that gets you into trouble. Are they muslim and does being muslim matter to them? Yes and yes. But like Walt Whitman, the individuals concerned – the “trees” but for which there would be no forest – contradict themselves, they are large, they contain multitudes. And that’s without even mentioning that nothing in the present state-centric global order evinces the slightest preparation for moving towards a “caliphate.”

    You said not long ago that if you were Arab, you would dedicate your every making moment to wiping out Israel. Okay, fine. But you seem to have a hard time understanding that not everybody is similarly motivated by thumotic identitarian considerations.

    European Civilization is dying before our very own eyes.

    European people certainly are, and with them much of what we conceive of European civilization. But the woke clownshow that is responsible for that death is also a part of that civilization, and it may have more life in it than you or I think. As Dmitry (for once correctly) keeps pointing out, its basic liberal tenets (though not its excesses) prove more attractive to muslims than islam proves to liberals.

    • Replies: @Yahya
    @silviosilver

    Ivashka is right.

    All nations shall eventually bend the knee to Muhammad ﷺ.

    It has been prophesized.

    Tamīm ad-Dāri (rA) reports that the Messenger of Allah ﷺ said, “This matter will certainly reach every place touched by the night and day. Allah will not leave a house of mud or [even] fur except that Allah will cause this religion to enter it, by which the honorable will be honored and the disgraceful will be disgraced. Allah will honor the honorable with Islam and he will disgrace the disgraceful with unbelief.”

    https://youtu.be/rQ0EKiCt6H8

    Replies: @silviosilver

  245. @Ivashka the fool
    @AP


    Пишут, что иранский КСИР готов отправить в Москву свои отряды для оказания помощи российскому правительству.

    История сомнительная, будем говорить откровенно. Без логистики, без языка, без баз любой экспедиционный корпус буквально растворится здесь. В Сирии шиитские Ваффен-СС выстраивали инфраструктуру года полтора, и только потом начали массированный заброс наемников. Тут с колес - ну очень все белыми нитками шито.

    С другой стороны, сейчас Путин может КСИРу вообще подарить все что угодно - вплоть до ядерного оружия, лишь бы спасти шкуру. Последствия в таких случаях интересуют очень слабо.
     

    From the Tg Channel of Anatoly Nesmiyan (Elmurid).

    If Shiah and Sunni Muslims can collaborate in the falling RusFed, if Turan and Iran unite their forces, then the future global Caliphate is rapidly becoming inevitable.

    Just wait and see, we'll probably live long enough to see the Islamisation of most of the FUSSR and therefore Eurasia becoming a nearly certain outcome.

    That would be the outcome of the russophobic policies of the Western puppeteers.

    Erdogan must be delighted with what is going on in RusFed.

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Yevardian

    Right, I can’t wait to see Kamil Galeev as the economic minister of the revived Kazan Khanate…
    This is why Armenians should be running Russian foreign policy, just imagine how much better things would have gone “Putin’s nationalist turn” (TM) led him to invading Azerbaijan (with tacit Iranian support) for its oil instead… Nobody in Europe would have cared about a bunch of Muslims being blown up, we saw that already in Chechnya.

  246. @silviosilver
    @Beckow


    Isn’t that how most wars end? The winner gets real stuff, but is hated by the losing side who goes on and on about how the fact that they are not dead means that now they are “free”.
     
    I can't think of any wars that ended with the loser pretending that, not being dead, they are now free. Give me an example.

    Freedom with less territory and more poverty, with millions who left and infrastructure destroyed.
     
    A submaximal territorial footprint, damaged infrastructure, and an (initial) increase in poverty and emigration are not inconsistent with greater freedom. It seems to me that the price all successful liberation movements have paid includes some or all of those factors.

    Replies: @Beckow

    …any wars that ended with the loser pretending that, not being dead, they are now free.

    The understanding of freedom has varied over history, but a few random examples: most failed liberation movements since time immemorial from the Germanics losing to Rome to all Third World liberation movements; US when losing in Vietnam or actually in all of the wars they lost, Paraguay when losing to Brazil-Argentina…and of course all the losing wars that Poland has fought, bloody disasters that spawned an endless but we are free folklore. Look up the rest, it is a very common pattern.

    A submaximal territorial footprint, damaged infrastructure, and an (initial) increase in poverty and emigration are not inconsistent with greater freedom.

    Ok, a shrunken country, decades of rebuilding, and people leaving – and not temporarily. Yes, in a way that is what a free country looks like, I like it…:) But the question is how many people will stay to live there given the misery and discomfort, when better life is just across the border in Europe and in Russia. We will see.

    • Replies: @silviosilver
    @Beckow

    I guess I read you too literally. You did say, "The winner gets real stuff, but is hated by the losing side who goes on and on about how the fact that they are not dead means that now they are “free”.

    The inclusion of the word "now" implies that their state of freedom is newly established, a result of the war they lost. However, all the examples you gave of the "very common pattern" are of the losing side preserving their existing state of freedom. Now, it did of course occur to me that this is what you were originally referring to, but I thought not even you would berate a losing side for fighting to preserve something of its freedom. Apparently I was wrong.

    Replies: @Beckow

    , @Mr. XYZ
    @Beckow


    Ok, a shrunken country, decades of rebuilding, and people leaving – and not temporarily. Yes, in a way that is what a free country looks like, I like it…:) But the question is how many people will stay to live there given the misery and discomfort, when better life is just across the border in Europe and in Russia. We will see.
     
    If Ukraine will have a long baby boom, then this could compensate for its lost people. And its lost people are likely going to be sending a lot of remittances into Ukraine anyway, which could spur a Ukrainian economic boom, especially considering that it's harder to steal remittances than to steal other kinds of money.

    Replies: @Beckow

  247. @silviosilver
    @Ivashka the fool


    I was already right about the Russian Time of Troubles 3.0 (Russian revolution being the 2.0), now you will witness a progressive strengthening of the Islamic Oumma.
     
    If you think the two news items you linked are evidence of this, then frankly, you are imagining things. Some analyses miss the forest for trees; you take such a big picture view of the world that you inevitably end up doing the opposite. It's like taking the fact that I am a 'racist' and thinking you can predict when I will replace my washing machine and what brand I will buy.

    Remember, you said: If Shiah and Sunni Muslims can collaborate in the falling RusFed, if Turan and Iran unite their forces, then the future global Caliphate is rapidly becoming inevitable.

    As conjecture, sure, that's plausible. It's trying to interpret contemporary events through that prism that gets you into trouble. Are they muslim and does being muslim matter to them? Yes and yes. But like Walt Whitman, the individuals concerned - the "trees" but for which there would be no forest - contradict themselves, they are large, they contain multitudes. And that's without even mentioning that nothing in the present state-centric global order evinces the slightest preparation for moving towards a "caliphate."

    You said not long ago that if you were Arab, you would dedicate your every making moment to wiping out Israel. Okay, fine. But you seem to have a hard time understanding that not everybody is similarly motivated by thumotic identitarian considerations.


    European Civilization is dying before our very own eyes.
     
    European people certainly are, and with them much of what we conceive of European civilization. But the woke clownshow that is responsible for that death is also a part of that civilization, and it may have more life in it than you or I think. As Dmitry (for once correctly) keeps pointing out, its basic liberal tenets (though not its excesses) prove more attractive to muslims than islam proves to liberals.

    Replies: @Yahya

    Ivashka is right.

    All nations shall eventually bend the knee to Muhammad ﷺ.

    It has been prophesized.

    Tamīm ad-Dāri (rA) reports that the Messenger of Allah ﷺ said, “This matter will certainly reach every place touched by the night and day. Allah will not leave a house of mud or [even] fur except that Allah will cause this religion to enter it, by which the honorable will be honored and the disgraceful will be disgraced. Allah will honor the honorable with Islam and he will disgrace the disgraceful with unbelief.”

    • Replies: @silviosilver
    @Yahya


    All nations shall eventually bend the knee to Muhammad
     
    Given the choice, I'd prefer to flash him a moony.

    How islamic are you anyway? I think I recall you saying you're an apostate, but how clean was the break?

    Replies: @Greasy William, @Yahya

  248. @Greasy William
    @Beckow


    And US’s goal is to ultimately control every square inch of the earth’s surface
     
    This is true. Hence this war is a defeat for the US, like I said.

    And your goal is…you see how silly that is?
     
    My goal is to destroy the United States and take revenge on white liberals. Although I guess that's actually two goals. But it is certainly not silly to believe that is what I want because I myself have repeatedly made as much clear.

    Similarly, everyone who isn't a die hard Russophile understands that the current Russian regime sees Ukraine as an inherent part of the Russian Motherland that was wrongfully torn away. And it is clear that Putin and co have always sought to "reunite" all of the lost "Russian" lands.


    Russia has been very clear about its goals: no Nato in Ukraine and normal human rights for Russians in Ukraine. Maybe they are lying and the real goal is to conquer everything to Sardinia.
     
    They are lying. The goal was and remains to end Ukraine as a nation. They view the Ukrainian state as an illegitimate, colonial Western project meant to weaken and ultimately dismember Russia. If you don't see things that way, fine; you're still wrong, though. Reality is what it is.

    Is “Russia” a person with unchangeable permanent goals?
     
    The Putin regime essentially is. Putin and those around him are practical men. I am certain that they are, or at least were, willing to work with Ukraine/NATO on peaceful solutions for the various disputes regarding Russia/Ukraine. However, they would always see Ukraine to be as illegitimate as China sees Taiwan and Russia would ultimately always be willing to use force to conquer the country as soon as it was practical to do so.

    If your point is that with better statecraft that the US and Ukraine could have prevented this war, I think that you are probably correct. It's also possible that if the war was pushed off long enough, Russia may have eventually changed it's attitude towards Ukraine and true peace based on mutual recognition could have been achieved. But that isn't what we're talking about here.


    You and that fellow ‘Strelkov?” can have a nice bitch-fest about it
     
    Without Strelkov, Ukraine would still control Crimea and the entire Donbas. He isn't just some nobody yapping on the internet. He's a bad guy and I'm certainly not saying he's infallible, but his reading of events shouldn't be summarily dismissed.

    And for the record, when the rest of the pro Russian internet brigade was praising Prigozhin as some super soldier, badass, Russian ultra patriot, Strelkov was sounding the alarm that Prigozhin was actually a loose cannon who was only out for himself. When this coup was launched, Strelkov immediately leapt to the defense of Putin, a man who he despises.

    You are free to ignore what Strelkov says, but you are only doing yourself a disservice.

    Replies: @Beckow, @Wokechoke, @Mr. Hack

    ..The goal was and remains to end Ukraine as a nation.

    There is no evidence for it – almost all Russia’s actions are way too moderate for that “goal”. Your stated goal of “revenge on white liberals” may be how you feel, but I doubt the “liberals” are changing their ways or even taking your “goal” into account. That was my point about these goals in general – they mean almost nothing in reality. But you are free to live in the paranoia.

    Without Strelkov, Ukraine would still control Crimea and the entire Donbas.

    An obvious nonsense. Crimea had a large Russian Navy base and 80-90% support for joining Russia, I am not even sure ‘Strelkov’ was there at the time. In Donbas there were quite a few catalysts, Strelkov being an important one, but it was the defeat of the Ukie invading armies that made Donbas win – the Ukies lost the war in 2014-5.

    I will continue ignoring Strelkov.

    • Replies: @Greasy William
    @Beckow


    Your stated goal of “revenge on white liberals” may be how you feel, but I doubt the “liberals” are changing their ways or even taking your “goal” into account.
     
    You're quite wrong. Liberals live in abject terror of the revenge that I have planned for them.
  249. @Greasy William
    @Beckow


    And US’s goal is to ultimately control every square inch of the earth’s surface
     
    This is true. Hence this war is a defeat for the US, like I said.

    And your goal is…you see how silly that is?
     
    My goal is to destroy the United States and take revenge on white liberals. Although I guess that's actually two goals. But it is certainly not silly to believe that is what I want because I myself have repeatedly made as much clear.

    Similarly, everyone who isn't a die hard Russophile understands that the current Russian regime sees Ukraine as an inherent part of the Russian Motherland that was wrongfully torn away. And it is clear that Putin and co have always sought to "reunite" all of the lost "Russian" lands.


    Russia has been very clear about its goals: no Nato in Ukraine and normal human rights for Russians in Ukraine. Maybe they are lying and the real goal is to conquer everything to Sardinia.
     
    They are lying. The goal was and remains to end Ukraine as a nation. They view the Ukrainian state as an illegitimate, colonial Western project meant to weaken and ultimately dismember Russia. If you don't see things that way, fine; you're still wrong, though. Reality is what it is.

    Is “Russia” a person with unchangeable permanent goals?
     
    The Putin regime essentially is. Putin and those around him are practical men. I am certain that they are, or at least were, willing to work with Ukraine/NATO on peaceful solutions for the various disputes regarding Russia/Ukraine. However, they would always see Ukraine to be as illegitimate as China sees Taiwan and Russia would ultimately always be willing to use force to conquer the country as soon as it was practical to do so.

    If your point is that with better statecraft that the US and Ukraine could have prevented this war, I think that you are probably correct. It's also possible that if the war was pushed off long enough, Russia may have eventually changed it's attitude towards Ukraine and true peace based on mutual recognition could have been achieved. But that isn't what we're talking about here.


    You and that fellow ‘Strelkov?” can have a nice bitch-fest about it
     
    Without Strelkov, Ukraine would still control Crimea and the entire Donbas. He isn't just some nobody yapping on the internet. He's a bad guy and I'm certainly not saying he's infallible, but his reading of events shouldn't be summarily dismissed.

    And for the record, when the rest of the pro Russian internet brigade was praising Prigozhin as some super soldier, badass, Russian ultra patriot, Strelkov was sounding the alarm that Prigozhin was actually a loose cannon who was only out for himself. When this coup was launched, Strelkov immediately leapt to the defense of Putin, a man who he despises.

    You are free to ignore what Strelkov says, but you are only doing yourself a disservice.

    Replies: @Beckow, @Wokechoke, @Mr. Hack

    Anyone willing to mention his Jewishness was onto him.

  250. @Mikhail
    Prigozhin's Decline

    Excellent overview with an interesting comparison to elements in the French military failing to overthrow de Gaulle in the 1960s and the MacArthur-Truman split. The optics of Prigozhin's action serve the interests of Russia's adversaries with the Russian government lax in addressing his insubordination.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4l532VKHA2E

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @Sean

    There is certainly no comparison with the French WW1 mutinies, or rather strikes, which were due to huge casualties, and disappointment at the Americans troops not shouldering much more of line as had been expected . A possible similarity is they usually started with troops getting drunk (Prigozhin is a drinker). The Germans did not know about it, luckily for France.

    Had Ukraine mounted an attack as soon as the Wagner revolt column drive became publically known , great things might have been achieves. For all their vaunted adaptability they are not agile enough to take advantage of such opportunities. Both sides in this war have become defence orientated and very ponderous. The breaching doctrine of combined arms as all militaries were theoretical experts has had its shortcomings in practice cruelly exposed.

    The Wagner revolt was prolly sparked by the ruling from the Kremlin that all Wagner personnel must sign contracts with the regular army by July. That was going to be a huge hit to their wallets, but they are now going to get more money, which seems fair as they are specialized assault infantry.

    The optics of Prigozhin’s action serve the interests of Russia’s adversaries with the Russian government lax in addressing his insubordination.

    The optics of the Bakhmut victory were obscured by PR in the West, but the fact is it was a concrete defeat for Ukraine of real importance for the morale of Ukrainian soldiers.

    Prigozhin’s Wagnerites-with-a-soaking-up-enemy firepower-screen-of-expendable convicts set up was ready, willing and able to successfully advance into cities with high buildings: what had been urban death traps for attackers. The regular Russian army even the VDV, was not so great at that. I believe the Zpenal bataions are going to be regular army from now on So Wagner work is done; they have pioneered new methods, which the regular army will now use and also take over all the troops with experienced in them, who will be paid in accordance with their proven skills. None of that is good news for Ukraine, which has not had a victory since November.

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @Sean

    The Rohr Battalion in ww1 had this function for the Germans. Special weapons and lavish pay plus experimental tactics.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assault_Battalion_No._5_(Rohr)


    The Australians were to become something similar for the British and Imperial forces in 1917-18 on the western front. That’s after the mixed bag of valour and ineptitude they displayed in Gallipoli as ANZACs. They were given more pay, light machine guns, smgs, stokes mortars, rifle grenades than other British American or French formations.


    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Corps

    Oddly General Monash, the Corps commander was a Jew of Prussian origins.

  251. @Beckow
    @silviosilver


    ...any wars that ended with the loser pretending that, not being dead, they are now free.
     
    The understanding of freedom has varied over history, but a few random examples: most failed liberation movements since time immemorial from the Germanics losing to Rome to all Third World liberation movements; US when losing in Vietnam or actually in all of the wars they lost, Paraguay when losing to Brazil-Argentina...and of course all the losing wars that Poland has fought, bloody disasters that spawned an endless but we are free folklore. Look up the rest, it is a very common pattern.

    A submaximal territorial footprint, damaged infrastructure, and an (initial) increase in poverty and emigration are not inconsistent with greater freedom.
     
    Ok, a shrunken country, decades of rebuilding, and people leaving - and not temporarily. Yes, in a way that is what a free country looks like, I like it...:) But the question is how many people will stay to live there given the misery and discomfort, when better life is just across the border in Europe and in Russia. We will see.

    Replies: @silviosilver, @Mr. XYZ

    I guess I read you too literally. You did say, “The winner gets real stuff, but is hated by the losing side who goes on and on about how the fact that they are not dead means that now they are “free”.

    The inclusion of the word “now” implies that their state of freedom is newly established, a result of the war they lost. However, all the examples you gave of the “very common pattern” are of the losing side preserving their existing state of freedom. Now, it did of course occur to me that this is what you were originally referring to, but I thought not even you would berate a losing side for fighting to preserve something of its freedom. Apparently I was wrong.

    • Replies: @Beckow
    @silviosilver


    ...you would berate a losing side
     
    I don't berate. It is a simple observation: some things work, some don't. Fighting losing battles doesn't work. Some ethnics get high on tearful myths and dreams of revenge, it has its pleasures, but it is no way to run a joint - we see it in Ukraine. Everything gets destroyed, people die, families mourn, ass.oles get rich.

    At the end there is nothing, people want to forget about it. And start asking questions like what were we dying for? At that point "freedom" doesn't do it, just an empty word for fanatics, simpletons or knaves.

    The Ukies are really dying for the 'right' to be in Nato. And to keep their Russian minority powerless - some even dream of eliminating the Russians completely like that autistic maniac AP. The problem is that it almost certainly won't work and there was a compromise that Ukies rejected. To hide that reality they yell slogans about "freedom"...It makes no sense when examined, it is a cover for other things that they don't want to say...not a good place to be when you lose.

  252. @Dmitry
    @AP


    they are young. But they are not Woke. They are normal.
     
    Eastern Europe is zone of relatively lack of culture, creativity, original and tradition, in relation to Western Europe. As result, almost everything related to culture in Eastern Europe, is imported from West or more recently also East Asia.

    There isn't a local culture production anymore and even in the 19th century the local production was dying and replaced with local versions of Western culture. But the culture you import from the developed countries still has to match to economic level, to social life, of people who will use this culture.

    Third and second world is always a kind of recycling machine for the culture of the first world. Old cars and clothes from the wealthy countries, are imported and recyled by the local people. Even Marxism could be recyled in incompetent way by the third world in the 20th century. But it has to be possible for use by the local people. You can import Toyota Landcruiser to African roads, not a Kei car.

    "Woke" is an elite ideology which is popular with wealthy Westerners who are living very socially conservative they don't like loud noises or clapping https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrVlrZX4UsI.

    For example, one of more popular youth fashion in Russia was in last decade (although less than "Kpop") was "offnik" fashion, it's the local copy of English football hooligan culture, wearing or beating people wearing "River Island" or "Burberry" cloths.

    Youth culture in Russia is created by watching English hooligan films like "The Football Factory" (2004) and trying to copy characters of England, their clothes and lifestyle.

    For the young people in Perm, it's possible to copy the characters of English working class films like "The Football Factory", where the lifestyle is a socially liberal.

    It's not possible to copy woke ideology of upper class young people of Harvard and the Dartmouth College, who are not drinking alcohol or using drugs in the weekend, who don't have relationships with women because they are studying, who don't like loud noises, who don't live with polluted industrial environment, who don't want to fight anyone etc.

    This is probably one why woke culture is difficult usually to import in Eastern Europe, except to some elite circles. It's like importing ballet from Paris to the 19th century Russian village, it would be limited only to some elite cities. Within a context of Ukraine, they can probably recycle parts of the woke culture by adding this to their nationalism importation projects.

    Like Cubans recycling parts of the different cars, in Ukraine they will say if your are Russians wearing embroidary, you are culturally appropriating the native customs of Ukraine.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Sean

    After the year 1000, Eastern Europe was always considerably less accomplished, especially per capita, relative to Western Europe:

    https://inquisitivebird.substack.com/p/the-rise-of-the-west?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2

    https://inquisitivebird.substack.com/p/which-european-nations-are-overrepresented?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2

    https://inquisitivebird.substack.com/p/notable-people-in-science-europe?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2

    Some charts from the articles above:

    Expecting Europeans from outside of the Hajnal Line to take over the leadership of the West from within-Hajnal Line Europeans is just ridiculous! In ancient times, they could definitely compete, but not after the year 1000:

    That’s from 700 BC to 1000 AD.

    I deeply regret that we don’t live in a world where we can see what human accomplishment in Eastern Europe would have looked like without both Communism and Nazism, though.

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @Mr. XYZ

    In Celine’s epic book Journey To The End of The Night the author’s avatar Bardamu discusses the French Race with his chum Arthur Barnate. “They came from the four corners of the earth driven by hunger plague tumours and cold and stopped here. They could not go further because of the Ocean. That’s us the French.”

    “Correct Arthur! hateful and spineless raped and robbed mangled and witless they are as good as we are.”


    It’s well worth a read. A pre ww2 French writer describes France and America in between with a little of whites in Africa.

    You get to see Detroit prewar. Or at least read about it.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Emil Nikola Richard, @Wokechoke

    , @LondonBob
    @Mr. XYZ

    Eastern Europe imported large numbers of Germans to assist them in economic development, even today ethnic Germans are well represented in the Russian elite.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @Mr. XYZ

    , @songbird
    @Mr. XYZ

    15 image posts without a "more" tag is a little much. Probably does not lend to stable threads going to 1000+.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

  253. @Yahya
    @Dmitry


    It’s similar like many countries in the world, e.g. as in Egypt. What happens for Mubarak in 2011 and el-Sisi in 2014?
     
    Yeah, that’s my point. Russian governmental structure is more like an Oriental country than a European one. Strange when a European phenotype is matched with Oriental behavior.

    But I suppose this peculiar “Asiatic” character of Russia has been commented on throughout the ages. Reminds me of Sukorov’s Russian Ark where he has the Marquis de Cuistine opine that “In Asia they love their tyrants. The more tyrannical, the more his memory is cherished. Alexander, Timur and Peter”.

    I think Ivashka’s “Eurasian” attribution probably reflects reality the best. Mixing elements of both, though from afar it seems to tilt European.


    t’s not even “more entertaining”, as it’s like any mafia zone, most of the time you don’t see anything.
     
    Yeah well I still think it’s an entertaining country. More interesting than a well-oiled machine like Australia or Switzerland.

    Replies: @Dmitry

    governmental structure is more like an Oriental country than a European

    It’s not like an oriental country. Historically it is more like a slave colony like Brazil or antebellum Southern States of the USA,

    Even today, it is not a traditional European country which develops the culture “inhouse”. The culture is imported by the international elites.

    Also in Russia, the control of the power, land and resource is important, not the culture which they are often changing. It was originally importing culture from the Byzantine Empire, before Peter already they are importing the culture from Europe.

    But the European culture is often imported as a luxury product for the elite, sometimes it’s followed more seriously which was in Soviet times, when because of ideological change of elite they follow the European ideas for managing the country.

    After 1991, it’s returned again to importing the European culture as a luxury, not as something they follow seriously for managing the country.

    de Cuistine opine that “In Asia they love their tyrants. The more tyrannical,

    It’s not true for Asia, unless you refer to parts of the Soviet Union like Turkmenistan. Even China since Mao, is going to collective leadership model, not the autocracy.

    Also the autocracy in the 20th century was a European model in Germany, Italy, Spain, Portugal. If you go to 19th century, it’s even France for most of their century.

    While the slave colony, was model of the European countries when they are managing regions outside Europe, like America, Caribbean.

    Until 19th century Russia follows the slave colony model, where the wealthy internationalist elite have a luxury mansion with thousands of souls which cannot escape this small area of land.

    It creates a very luxury lifestyle, which is romanticized by the local versions of European literature. It’s similar model to Antebellum Southern States of USA and Brazil in this epoch.

    After 1991, because of the oil and gas money is so large, there is a similar recreation of this lifestyle for people who have control of natural resources.

    This is in postsoviet system doesn’t create the wealthy and money for the luxuries, from the slaves or labor. It’s from ground under the people.

    Yeah well I still think it’s an entertaining country. More interesting than a well-oiled machine like Australia or Switzerland.

    Maybe, if you have a very long life. Political instability is inevitable and also uncommon. It’s like earthquakes in Turkey. So, there are some political instability, then a few decades of stabilization where it seems very calm.

    Westerners in 1917, were probably saying “Russia is an entertaining country”. Then the government mainly doesn’t change across 70 years, except with some modulations around Stalin. It’s one of the most stable governments in the world.

    There is instability of 1980s to 1991. But then we have same government since 1991, which is already 32 years. There is just small modifications to the government in 1995, when Yeltsin changes direction, or from 1996 the Saint-Petersburg clique (Putin, Medvedev, Sechin etc) is merging to the Yeltsin government.

    Even if there is some dramatical story like in 1999, when they were “mysterious” bombing residents’ buildings in Moscow. In 1979 there was anthrax leak in Sverdlovsk. In 1957, there was nuclear disaster in Ozyorsk.

    The information will not be public unless you wait for the next government, will publicize the information. So, you might wait a few decades, before the information is open. Before then, the information is very opaque..

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @Dmitry


    Even China since Mao, is going to collective leadership model, not the autocracy.
     
    Xi Jinping is currently changing this and becoming Chinese Emperor. Emperor Winnie the Pooh, imagine that!

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b5/Xinnie_the_Pooh.png/640px-Xinnie_the_Pooh.png

    https://i0.wp.com/www.opindia.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Xi-Jinping-Winnie-the-Pooh.jpg?fit=1050%2C597&ssl=1

    https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cpsprodpb/5074/production/_96969502_78b75efc-37fe-449f-944e-0fa30805a597.jpg

    https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/1024/cpsprodpb/17577/production/_96970659_abexi.jpg

    https://www.hindustantimes.com/ht-img/img/2023/05/20/1600x900/Winnie_The_pooh_1684559788481_1684559788782.jpg
    , @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms
    @Dmitry

    and @ Yahya

    Xi is a dictator, perhaps the most powerful one ever -- with centralized control of Party, State and Army of the biggest industrial power on earth. But Japan has no history of single man dictatorships, and it is certainly an Oriental country. So "Oriental governmental structure" imply that it's dictorial is a false premise. The longest serving Japanese PM is only Abe at less than nine years:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_prime_ministers_of_Japan#Length_of_tenure


    Historically it is more like a slave colony like Brazil or antebellum Southern States of the USA,
     
    No. Russia far more expansionary, so proper to be characterized as successor of the Mongols, Huns and other north Eurasian empires.

    Chinese and Japanese POV--

    https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/Жовторосія
    "Yellow Russia" colonial project to colonize Qing China north of the Great Wall
    https://i.postimg.cc/xC2fSDht/image.jpg

    南下政策 “Southern Expansion Policy”, to acquire ice-free ports
    https://i.postimg.cc/L8yRTrF6/7130c70675b265f010910a717b383e2f.jpg


    Even today, it is not a traditional European country which develops the culture “inhouse”. The culture is imported by the international elites.
     
    You actually sound like alot of self-loathing Chinese ethnics-- who says that China is a cultural 洼地 “sinkhole”. But there are geo-historical reasons for this, both northern China and Russia lie on flat terrains so prone to invasions. Prigozhin boasted about marching to Moscow in x hours, you can only do that because there's not an Alps or English Channel in between.

    We know with Switzerland, they had the most funding per capita for science and R&D in the 20th century, so the high proportion of Nobel prizes were very predictable in this viewpoint.
     
    https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-219/#comment-5982926

    This is circular logic. Switzerland lies on the most rugged terrain in Europe which 1) insulating it from invasions, 2) builds a warlike character. Thus provide incubation for high-end niche industries availing scientific investments. Germany cannot become 10 Switzerlands, it doesn't "scale".

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Dmitry

  254. @Mr. XYZ
    @Dmitry

    After the year 1000, Eastern Europe was always considerably less accomplished, especially per capita, relative to Western Europe:

    https://inquisitivebird.substack.com/p/the-rise-of-the-west?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2

    https://inquisitivebird.substack.com/p/which-european-nations-are-overrepresented?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2

    https://inquisitivebird.substack.com/p/notable-people-in-science-europe?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2

    Some charts from the articles above:

    https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F1eafb23d-ca9e-4cbe-be7f-78a41f1acc0b_1267x893.png

    https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F1a30831c-dca0-4e66-a422-efe5c8fc42ce_1267x893.png

    https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fd3bf3d4c-6760-4907-83c8-15f88bf07580_1116x862.png

    https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fb18c8704-db1f-4db7-83ab-4e8593eff3d9_982x897.png

    https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fb843b075-0f17-4391-84b9-1105a1559234_791x910.png

    https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F325c23a4-9fe8-437e-9ac4-788521a0cace_815x599.png

    Expecting Europeans from outside of the Hajnal Line to take over the leadership of the West from within-Hajnal Line Europeans is just ridiculous! In ancient times, they could definitely compete, but not after the year 1000:

    https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Feb3dc420-ffc6-499c-996a-5f0258f5c4c2_1084x732.png

    That's from 700 BC to 1000 AD.

    https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F94dcf858-e57a-4e73-8c5f-3cffae2b3db5_1066x718.png

    https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F2030c2f9-c6e0-43a6-869b-6da3f71e0ee7_1066x718.png

    https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F12152984-8da5-4bfe-b593-58788d720c35_1066x718.png

    https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F0904bd02-9df7-4613-95c4-1a13077eaf29_1066x718.png

    https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F844a94b2-4bc9-466a-8bb0-50cabbf8a1a4_1066x718.png

    https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F9ec179a7-2499-4331-9fb8-72a9eef23d7e_1066x718.png

    https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fb5be2e9a-c192-44bd-bd23-2309d3d72115_1066x718.png

    https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fd851cb12-2dcd-4dac-853b-ea322872d321_1066x718.png

    I deeply regret that we don't live in a world where we can see what human accomplishment in Eastern Europe would have looked like without both Communism and Nazism, though.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @LondonBob, @songbird

    In Celine’s epic book Journey To The End of The Night the author’s avatar Bardamu discusses the French Race with his chum Arthur Barnate. “They came from the four corners of the earth driven by hunger plague tumours and cold and stopped here. They could not go further because of the Ocean. That’s us the French.”

    “Correct Arthur! hateful and spineless raped and robbed mangled and witless they are as good as we are.”

    It’s well worth a read. A pre ww2 French writer describes France and America in between with a little of whites in Africa.

    You get to see Detroit prewar. Or at least read about it.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @Wokechoke

    French and Americans should not have been colonizing Africa unless the natives would have explicitly invited them to do so. Still, French colonization appears to have been more benign for Africa relative to British colonization. Former French colonies in Africa are less homophobic than former British colonies in Africa are, after all. Stupid Victorian prudes and bigoted Christian American preachers making Africans viscerally homophobic! :(

    Replies: @Wokechoke

    , @Emil Nikola Richard
    @Wokechoke

    He was about as cheerful as Cormac McCarthey. Has anybody read it over and over?

    Replies: @Another Polish Perspective

    , @Wokechoke
    @Wokechoke

    it's a funny book. I was mainly interested in it because Celine turned out to be a Modernist and Fascist. Also George MacDonald Frasers Flashman bears some resemblance to Bardamu.

    Replies: @Coconuts

  255. @Ivashka the fool
    @AP

    Read my comment above about the nuclear weapons base (Blagoveshhensk 45) that Wagnerites were close to seize or have perhaps even entered. Nuclear security is way more important than anything else. The G7 had a number of video-calls today. They should understand by now that in the case of an outright unraveling of RusFed, it would be impossible to guarantee the non proliferation and secure the strategic weapons. Therefore, they must understand now that RusFed is not to be pressured to the very end.

    Obama has spoken yesterday and said that Crimea annexation had some justification to it after all. I don't think most Ukrainians really want to bring back Donbass into the fold. Therefore, Donbass and Crimea might be ceded to RusFed.

    But there's the problem of Putin and his hawkish circle. These people are mostly old. They should retire, but they can't because they are afraid that they will be transferred to the ICC like Miloshevich. Someone must guarantee them that it will never happen.

    Dyumin comes across as this kind of man, he was a very calm and dutiful person in Putin's service, he is well educated and is a healthy and successful man. He would be a good leader. But he lacked the military force that Vorobyov might have gotten from Kadyrov and he had none to stand for him against Zolotov's Guard. Now, if today's events are really as I think they are, he will have the support of the Wagnerites and also Lukashenka.

    He might then push to the exit the old Noviop circle, guarantee their immunity and safety and then work to stop the war that Ukraine cannot win without NATO's help. A help that will probably now be reduced, because nobody wants RusFed unraveling and some Wagnerites or Russian Nationalists holding Sarmat missiles and blackmailing EU and the International Community the way Norks are doing it. So everything could be blamed on Putin and his circle, and we might move on from all this mess towards something manageable.

    Basically it would mean that Ukraine would receive RusFed-ian seized moneys to rebuild, Crimea and Donbass would be ceded to Russia. Ukraine might then be accepted into NATO and offered a (long) path towards EU integration. Russia would have its new regions to rebuild without any external help which will be a substantial drawback on its progress towards any eventual superpower status, but it would need no more to depend on Chinese good will and might be slowly brought closer into the Western Globalist fold.

    It would be the equivalent of the Finland - Soviet winter war.

    Each side would have made sacrifices and each side would have something to show as a consolation prize.

    Replies: @AP

    How nice this would be…

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @AP


    The source of the Cheka-OGPU named the true beneficiaries of PMC Wagner - this is the current leadership of the Main Directorate of the General Staff (GRU) and the former bodyguard of Putin, the governor of the Tula region, Alexei Dyumin.

    "Wagner" as a military organization was created and managed by GRU officers from among retirees and active military personnel. It was the Wagner that was used and is being used to fulfill the targets of the GRU. Of particular note is the governor of the Tula region, Alexei Dyumin, whose contribution to the development of PMC Wagner is the most significant. Dyumin communicates directly with Prigozhin, within which the latter acts more as a junior business partner. It is also noteworthy that Dyumin's bodyguards are active members of the GRU special forces (military personnel of the military unit with the symbolic military unit number 45678), and not members of the FSO, as it should be for the governor, - said the source of the Cheka-OGPU. - Prigozhin just happened to be in the right place at the right time and with the right connections. His unofficial status allows him to lead the PMC and develop the brand, advertising it to the whole world at the expense of the war, which the current leadership of the GRU and the governor of the Tula region cannot do. Regardless of how the war ends, the beneficiaries of PMC Wagner find themselves in a positive financial balance with the prospect of many contracts around the world.
     
    https://t.me/vchkogpu/37147


    Dyumin, Aleksey Gennadievich (in the photo he is holding a standard) - I believe most of you first heard this surname yesterday, when many Z-bloggers froze with the hope that someone would finally replace the disgusted Marshal of Victory.

    Let's briefly go over his biography (I note that it was compiled from open sources and cannot be verified):
    - his father, a general, was in the inner circle of Pasha "Mercedes" Grachev (Pasha is also known as the author of the meme "take Grozny with one airborne regiment in two hours");
    - his brother is a businessman, general director of the Olimpiysky sports complex and a developer of many objects;
    - graduated from the Voronezh School of Radio Electronics, since 1995 served in the FSO, where he organized communications for Yeltsin and Chernomyrdin;
    - since 1999 - in the Presidential Security Service;
    - since 2008 - Putin's adjutant (when he was chairman of the government);
    - since 2012 - deputy. Head of the Presidential Security Service;
    - since 2014 - deputy. head of the GRU, commander of the special operations forces, according to the authors of the film "Crimea. The Way to the Homeland", played a key role in the annexation of the peninsula and the evacuation of Yanukovych. Presumably, for this he received the "Hero of Russia";
    - since 2015 - Chief of the Main Staff of the Ground Forces;
    - since December 2015 - deputy. the Minister of Defense;
    - from February 2016 to this day - all of a sudden, the governor of the Tula region (what a turn!). There were no public corruption scandals associated with him, although his assistant was arrested for embezzlement on an especially large scale.

    A number of experts called him one of three possible (together with Medvedev and Sobyanin) Putin's successors.

    Summing up, in the event of his possible appointment as Minister of Defense of the Russian Federation (by the way, unlikely, since after the Prigozhin rebellion, removing Shoigu for Putin means showing weakness), his personal devotion to Putin is primary, and not his professional qualities as a military man (at least due to the lack of appropriate education and/or combat experience).
     
    https://t.me/m0sc0wcalling/26233

    Also interesting (in Russian):

    https://t.me/specnaz_com/6418

    Which perhaps contributed to what I link below:

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/06/23/obama-ukraine-russia-putin-crimea-kyiv-2014-moscow-us-presi/

    https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/russia-mercenary-threat-revives-concern-over-nuclear-arsenal-security-2023-06-24/

    https://www.zerohedge.com/political/msm-betrays-biden-regime-savages-spoxs-over-corruption-bombshells

    If that is indeed a result of this operation, then it was a brilliant operation. Wouldn't be surprising from the man (Dyumin) who supervised the taking of Crimea in 2014.

    https://youtu.be/0FSpNU53Fqg

    Brilliant, amazingly brilliant.

    I usually decry everything that is done in RusFed, but this was good. Except the pilots that got killed, but even that was a show of force: "We can down military planes, while you are frayerà, you will swallow and humbly wipe your mouths after the act."

    Everything as the "deep people" likes, all the intellectualisations non-withstanding.
  256. @Dmitry
    @AP


    they are young. But they are not Woke. They are normal.
     
    Eastern Europe is zone of relatively lack of culture, creativity, original and tradition, in relation to Western Europe. As result, almost everything related to culture in Eastern Europe, is imported from West or more recently also East Asia.

    There isn't a local culture production anymore and even in the 19th century the local production was dying and replaced with local versions of Western culture. But the culture you import from the developed countries still has to match to economic level, to social life, of people who will use this culture.

    Third and second world is always a kind of recycling machine for the culture of the first world. Old cars and clothes from the wealthy countries, are imported and recyled by the local people. Even Marxism could be recyled in incompetent way by the third world in the 20th century. But it has to be possible for use by the local people. You can import Toyota Landcruiser to African roads, not a Kei car.

    "Woke" is an elite ideology which is popular with wealthy Westerners who are living very socially conservative they don't like loud noises or clapping https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrVlrZX4UsI.

    For example, one of more popular youth fashion in Russia was in last decade (although less than "Kpop") was "offnik" fashion, it's the local copy of English football hooligan culture, wearing or beating people wearing "River Island" or "Burberry" cloths.

    Youth culture in Russia is created by watching English hooligan films like "The Football Factory" (2004) and trying to copy characters of England, their clothes and lifestyle.

    For the young people in Perm, it's possible to copy the characters of English working class films like "The Football Factory", where the lifestyle is a socially liberal.

    It's not possible to copy woke ideology of upper class young people of Harvard and the Dartmouth College, who are not drinking alcohol or using drugs in the weekend, who don't have relationships with women because they are studying, who don't like loud noises, who don't live with polluted industrial environment, who don't want to fight anyone etc.

    This is probably one why woke culture is difficult usually to import in Eastern Europe, except to some elite circles. It's like importing ballet from Paris to the 19th century Russian village, it would be limited only to some elite cities. Within a context of Ukraine, they can probably recycle parts of the woke culture by adding this to their nationalism importation projects.

    Like Cubans recycling parts of the different cars, in Ukraine they will say if your are Russians wearing embroidary, you are culturally appropriating the native customs of Ukraine.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Sean

    De Maistre found to his horror in the salons of St Petersburg, that instead of social hierarchy and the strong hand of law, the fashionable etherealities of French revolutionary philosophy he was fleeing had been taken up by the Russian intelligentsia.

    http://www.martin-van-creveld.com/2336-2/
    While it is always possible to find precedents—going back, in this ease, to the great 17th-century Cossack revolt against Poland/Lithuania {I’ve read it was against the arrendator Jews of the Polish lords Sean}—Ukrainian nationalism is mainly a product of the nineteenth century when country’s western provinces were strongly influenced by the Austrian empire. Much later this fact enabled Russian President Vladimir Putin to claim that it was not a native movement but an imported one..

    In Ukraine as in other countries, initially nationalism was generated by a tiny urban elite of highly cultured literati by no means representative of the people as a whole. In Ukraine as in other countries, members of this elite sometimes went to the countryside in the hope of discovering and preserving “aboriginal” and “pure” traditions in which to anchor their views. In Ukraine as in other countries, some such traditions were invented almost ex nihil. Old or new, they provided people—mainly Russians, Ukrainians, and Poles—with additional reasons for fighting each other tooth and nail; nowhere more so than in the “Bloodlands” (historian Timothy D. Snyder) of Eastern Europe.

    On the other hand, many famous “Ukrainian” (in the sense that they were born in Ukraine) writers actually wrote in Russian. Nikolai Gogol, the best-known “Ukrainian” writer of all, was born in Sorochyntsi, a Cossack village in what is now Ukraine’s Poltava Oblast, but wrote in Russian. The same applied to Anna Akhmatova and Isaac Babel (both from Odessa) and Mikhail Bulgakov (from Kiev). This list could easily be extended

    • Replies: @Dmitry
    @Sean

    There is a different situation in the last 20 years, as large part of the elites in Russia have exited from living in Russia mostly around 2005-2015.

    There was the emigration of the elites mostly after around 2005, while some are still managing Russia, there are also their property and assets outside Russia.

    I feel most of educated internal discussion in Russia are middle class people, who are quite "rooted" (i.e. "trapped") in Russia. In last decade, liberal ideology in Russia is usually practical, boring and sensible for improving life, related to improving power of the ordinary people, urbanism (cleaning streets etc), reducing open borders immigration, improving the external relations with the powerful countries etc. It has also reduced influence with the authorities though and it's less elite than the liberalism in the past.

    Replies: @Sean

    , @AP
    @Sean

    Sorry, but Creveld's passage is full of nonsense:


    Ukrainian nationalism is mainly a product of the nineteenth century when country’s western provinces were strongly influenced by the Austrian empire.
     
    1. Most nationalisms were products of the late 18th century and 19th century,

    2. The Ukrainian one originated in the Russian Empire and imported by the Austrians in order to defeat the local Russophilia of the natives (which had been useful and originally supported by the Austrians in the early-mid 19th century when Russia was an ally, but then became dangerous when Russia became a rival)

    In Ukraine as in other countries, initially nationalism was generated by a tiny urban elite of highly cultured literati by no means representative of the people as a whole.
     
    This is nonsense. In Ukraine nationalism was formulated by people from the countryside or from small market towns in the country, not urban elites. The main national poet, Taras Shevchenko, was literally a serf. The other figures were mostly rural gentry or of rural Cossack officer descent. Rural origins were a defining feature of early Ukrainian nationalists and something that differentiated them from their Russian rivals. It also made them better connected to the peasants, whereas the Russians were rather alienated from them despite idolizing them.

    Other figures:

    Ivan Kotliarevsky, first author to write in the Ukrainian language, petty gentry from the town of Poltava, which had about 8,000 people when he lived there

    Panteleimon Kulish, who standardized the Ukrainian language, from an impoverished former Cossack officer family, from a small town in Sumy region

    Volodymyr Antonovych, early Ukrainian historian, from an impoverished noble family of Polish descent, from the small town of Makhnivka

    Mykhailo Hrushevsky, national historian, mother was from a Ukrainian village but he himself grew up in cities

    Ivan Franko - mother was poor village gentry, father a blacksmith of German settler origin - born in a small town

    On the other hand, many famous “Ukrainian” (in the sense that they were born in Ukraine) writers actually wrote in Russian. Nikolai Gogol, the best-known “Ukrainian” writer of all, was born in Sorochyntsi, a Cossack village in what is now Ukraine’s Poltava Oblast, but wrote in Russian. The same applied to Anna Akhmatova and Isaac Babel (both from Odessa) and Mikhail Bulgakov (from Kiev). This list could easily be extended
     
    Above, the only Ukrainian on the list (Gogol) was from a village, while the others were from cities.
    The ethnic Russian (Bulgakov) was from Kiev and the Jew (Babel) and half-Russian, half-Ukrainian (Akhmatova) were from Odessa.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

  257. @Wokechoke
    @Mr. XYZ

    In Celine’s epic book Journey To The End of The Night the author’s avatar Bardamu discusses the French Race with his chum Arthur Barnate. “They came from the four corners of the earth driven by hunger plague tumours and cold and stopped here. They could not go further because of the Ocean. That’s us the French.”

    “Correct Arthur! hateful and spineless raped and robbed mangled and witless they are as good as we are.”


    It’s well worth a read. A pre ww2 French writer describes France and America in between with a little of whites in Africa.

    You get to see Detroit prewar. Or at least read about it.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Emil Nikola Richard, @Wokechoke

    French and Americans should not have been colonizing Africa unless the natives would have explicitly invited them to do so. Still, French colonization appears to have been more benign for Africa relative to British colonization. Former French colonies in Africa are less homophobic than former British colonies in Africa are, after all. Stupid Victorian prudes and bigoted Christian American preachers making Africans viscerally homophobic! 🙁

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @Mr. XYZ

    What is your concern for fags?

    Replies: @silviosilver

  258. @Dmitry
    @Yahya


    governmental structure is more like an Oriental country than a European
     
    It's not like an oriental country. Historically it is more like a slave colony like Brazil or antebellum Southern States of the USA,

    Even today, it is not a traditional European country which develops the culture "inhouse". The culture is imported by the international elites.

    Also in Russia, the control of the power, land and resource is important, not the culture which they are often changing. It was originally importing culture from the Byzantine Empire, before Peter already they are importing the culture from Europe.

    But the European culture is often imported as a luxury product for the elite, sometimes it's followed more seriously which was in Soviet times, when because of ideological change of elite they follow the European ideas for managing the country.

    After 1991, it's returned again to importing the European culture as a luxury, not as something they follow seriously for managing the country.


    de Cuistine opine that “In Asia they love their tyrants. The more tyrannical,
     
    It's not true for Asia, unless you refer to parts of the Soviet Union like Turkmenistan. Even China since Mao, is going to collective leadership model, not the autocracy.

    Also the autocracy in the 20th century was a European model in Germany, Italy, Spain, Portugal. If you go to 19th century, it's even France for most of their century.

    While the slave colony, was model of the European countries when they are managing regions outside Europe, like America, Caribbean.

    Until 19th century Russia follows the slave colony model, where the wealthy internationalist elite have a luxury mansion with thousands of souls which cannot escape this small area of land.

    It creates a very luxury lifestyle, which is romanticized by the local versions of European literature. It's similar model to Antebellum Southern States of USA and Brazil in this epoch.

    After 1991, because of the oil and gas money is so large, there is a similar recreation of this lifestyle for people who have control of natural resources.

    This is in postsoviet system doesn't create the wealthy and money for the luxuries, from the slaves or labor. It's from ground under the people.


    Yeah well I still think it’s an entertaining country. More interesting than a well-oiled machine like Australia or Switzerland.

     

    Maybe, if you have a very long life. Political instability is inevitable and also uncommon. It's like earthquakes in Turkey. So, there are some political instability, then a few decades of stabilization where it seems very calm.

    Westerners in 1917, were probably saying "Russia is an entertaining country". Then the government mainly doesn't change across 70 years, except with some modulations around Stalin. It's one of the most stable governments in the world.

    There is instability of 1980s to 1991. But then we have same government since 1991, which is already 32 years. There is just small modifications to the government in 1995, when Yeltsin changes direction, or from 1996 the Saint-Petersburg clique (Putin, Medvedev, Sechin etc) is merging to the Yeltsin government.

    Even if there is some dramatical story like in 1999, when they were "mysterious" bombing residents' buildings in Moscow. In 1979 there was anthrax leak in Sverdlovsk. In 1957, there was nuclear disaster in Ozyorsk.

    The information will not be public unless you wait for the next government, will publicize the information. So, you might wait a few decades, before the information is open. Before then, the information is very opaque..

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    Even China since Mao, is going to collective leadership model, not the autocracy.

    Xi Jinping is currently changing this and becoming Chinese Emperor. Emperor Winnie the Pooh, imagine that!

    https://i0.wp.com/www.opindia.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Xi-Jinping-Winnie-the-Pooh.jpg?fit=1050%2C597&ssl=1

  259. @Mr. XYZ
    @Wokechoke

    French and Americans should not have been colonizing Africa unless the natives would have explicitly invited them to do so. Still, French colonization appears to have been more benign for Africa relative to British colonization. Former French colonies in Africa are less homophobic than former British colonies in Africa are, after all. Stupid Victorian prudes and bigoted Christian American preachers making Africans viscerally homophobic! :(

    Replies: @Wokechoke

    What is your concern for fags?

    • Replies: @silviosilver
    @Wokechoke

    He's a faggot himself, as if that isn't obvious by now. Actually, he's worse, he's an lbgt activist. They had "tolerance" decades ago. They want much, much more. After everything we've seen in recent years, no sane person should be willing to grant them more.

  260. @Beckow
    @Greasy William


    ..The goal was and remains to end Ukraine as a nation.
     
    There is no evidence for it - almost all Russia's actions are way too moderate for that "goal". Your stated goal of "revenge on white liberals" may be how you feel, but I doubt the "liberals" are changing their ways or even taking your "goal" into account. That was my point about these goals in general - they mean almost nothing in reality. But you are free to live in the paranoia.

    Without Strelkov, Ukraine would still control Crimea and the entire Donbas.

     

    An obvious nonsense. Crimea had a large Russian Navy base and 80-90% support for joining Russia, I am not even sure 'Strelkov' was there at the time. In Donbas there were quite a few catalysts, Strelkov being an important one, but it was the defeat of the Ukie invading armies that made Donbas win - the Ukies lost the war in 2014-5.

    I will continue ignoring Strelkov.

    Replies: @Greasy William

    Your stated goal of “revenge on white liberals” may be how you feel, but I doubt the “liberals” are changing their ways or even taking your “goal” into account.

    You’re quite wrong. Liberals live in abject terror of the revenge that I have planned for them.

  261. @Yahya
    @silviosilver

    Ivashka is right.

    All nations shall eventually bend the knee to Muhammad ﷺ.

    It has been prophesized.

    Tamīm ad-Dāri (rA) reports that the Messenger of Allah ﷺ said, “This matter will certainly reach every place touched by the night and day. Allah will not leave a house of mud or [even] fur except that Allah will cause this religion to enter it, by which the honorable will be honored and the disgraceful will be disgraced. Allah will honor the honorable with Islam and he will disgrace the disgraceful with unbelief.”

    https://youtu.be/rQ0EKiCt6H8

    Replies: @silviosilver

    All nations shall eventually bend the knee to Muhammad

    Given the choice, I’d prefer to flash him a moony.

    How islamic are you anyway? I think I recall you saying you’re an apostate, but how clean was the break?

    • Thanks: LatW
    • Replies: @Greasy William
    @silviosilver

    Yahya thinks even less of Islam than he does of blacks

    , @Yahya
    @silviosilver


    How islamic are you anyway? I think I recall you saying you’re an apostate, but how clean was the break?
     
    Well I don’t recall mentioning that at all, and I’d prefer not to comment on my religious views on this forum. I’ll just say that Islam is the faith of my ancestors (and I suppose Christianity and Judaism too, but these are too old for me to care about) so I have an emotional attachment to it.

    I’m still amazed at the foresight and perspicacity of Big Mo and his companions.

    They did everything right to build Islam into a resilient, self-perpetuating religion.

    - Patriarchal orientation
    - In-breeding patterns
    - Supremacy of religious identity
    - Corporal punishment for apostasy

    And most pleasingly, they have constructed it such that Arabs would forever remain the Herrenvolk of the faith. Other groups may gain technological, demographic or military supremacy for a period of time, but the faithful must inevitably march to the tune of Muhammad’s peeps. Thats why the religion is still associated with Arabs, despite constituting only 25% of the world’s Muslims (interesting fact: there are more people in Indonesia + Bangladesh than the entire Arab world). It also underlies the Turco-Persian seething and coping.

    Replies: @silviosilver, @Another Polish Perspective

  262. @Wokechoke
    @Mr. XYZ

    What is your concern for fags?

    Replies: @silviosilver

    He’s a faggot himself, as if that isn’t obvious by now. Actually, he’s worse, he’s an lbgt activist. They had “tolerance” decades ago. They want much, much more. After everything we’ve seen in recent years, no sane person should be willing to grant them more.

  263. @Beckow
    @silviosilver


    ...any wars that ended with the loser pretending that, not being dead, they are now free.
     
    The understanding of freedom has varied over history, but a few random examples: most failed liberation movements since time immemorial from the Germanics losing to Rome to all Third World liberation movements; US when losing in Vietnam or actually in all of the wars they lost, Paraguay when losing to Brazil-Argentina...and of course all the losing wars that Poland has fought, bloody disasters that spawned an endless but we are free folklore. Look up the rest, it is a very common pattern.

    A submaximal territorial footprint, damaged infrastructure, and an (initial) increase in poverty and emigration are not inconsistent with greater freedom.
     
    Ok, a shrunken country, decades of rebuilding, and people leaving - and not temporarily. Yes, in a way that is what a free country looks like, I like it...:) But the question is how many people will stay to live there given the misery and discomfort, when better life is just across the border in Europe and in Russia. We will see.

    Replies: @silviosilver, @Mr. XYZ

    Ok, a shrunken country, decades of rebuilding, and people leaving – and not temporarily. Yes, in a way that is what a free country looks like, I like it…:) But the question is how many people will stay to live there given the misery and discomfort, when better life is just across the border in Europe and in Russia. We will see.

    If Ukraine will have a long baby boom, then this could compensate for its lost people. And its lost people are likely going to be sending a lot of remittances into Ukraine anyway, which could spur a Ukrainian economic boom, especially considering that it’s harder to steal remittances than to steal other kinds of money.

    • Replies: @Beckow
    @Mr. XYZ


    ...If Ukraine will have a long baby boom
     
    If...

    it’s harder to steal remittances than to steal other kinds of money.
     
    I am sure the survivors will figure it out...
  264. @Mr. XYZ
    @Dmitry

    After the year 1000, Eastern Europe was always considerably less accomplished, especially per capita, relative to Western Europe:

    https://inquisitivebird.substack.com/p/the-rise-of-the-west?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2

    https://inquisitivebird.substack.com/p/which-european-nations-are-overrepresented?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2

    https://inquisitivebird.substack.com/p/notable-people-in-science-europe?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2

    Some charts from the articles above:

    https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F1eafb23d-ca9e-4cbe-be7f-78a41f1acc0b_1267x893.png

    https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F1a30831c-dca0-4e66-a422-efe5c8fc42ce_1267x893.png

    https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fd3bf3d4c-6760-4907-83c8-15f88bf07580_1116x862.png

    https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fb18c8704-db1f-4db7-83ab-4e8593eff3d9_982x897.png

    https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fb843b075-0f17-4391-84b9-1105a1559234_791x910.png

    https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F325c23a4-9fe8-437e-9ac4-788521a0cace_815x599.png

    Expecting Europeans from outside of the Hajnal Line to take over the leadership of the West from within-Hajnal Line Europeans is just ridiculous! In ancient times, they could definitely compete, but not after the year 1000:

    https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Feb3dc420-ffc6-499c-996a-5f0258f5c4c2_1084x732.png

    That's from 700 BC to 1000 AD.

    https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F94dcf858-e57a-4e73-8c5f-3cffae2b3db5_1066x718.png

    https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F2030c2f9-c6e0-43a6-869b-6da3f71e0ee7_1066x718.png

    https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F12152984-8da5-4bfe-b593-58788d720c35_1066x718.png

    https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F0904bd02-9df7-4613-95c4-1a13077eaf29_1066x718.png

    https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F844a94b2-4bc9-466a-8bb0-50cabbf8a1a4_1066x718.png

    https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F9ec179a7-2499-4331-9fb8-72a9eef23d7e_1066x718.png

    https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fb5be2e9a-c192-44bd-bd23-2309d3d72115_1066x718.png

    https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fd851cb12-2dcd-4dac-853b-ea322872d321_1066x718.png

    I deeply regret that we don't live in a world where we can see what human accomplishment in Eastern Europe would have looked like without both Communism and Nazism, though.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @LondonBob, @songbird

    Eastern Europe imported large numbers of Germans to assist them in economic development, even today ethnic Germans are well represented in the Russian elite.

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @LondonBob

    Pierce Edmond De Lacy is my favourite Wild Geese story.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Lacy

    Make Crimea Irish again, that's all have to say on the matter.

    Replies: @S

    , @Mr. XYZ
    @LondonBob

    There are also some people of Jewish descent in prominent leadership positions in the ex-USSR countries since the end of the Cold War in spite of their small and rapidly declining share of the total population. Jews also originally came to Eastern Europe from Germany, no? The Ashkenazim, I mean.

    Replies: @Wokechoke

  265. @silviosilver
    @Yahya


    All nations shall eventually bend the knee to Muhammad
     
    Given the choice, I'd prefer to flash him a moony.

    How islamic are you anyway? I think I recall you saying you're an apostate, but how clean was the break?

    Replies: @Greasy William, @Yahya

    Yahya thinks even less of Islam than he does of blacks

  266. @John Johnson
    @Sean

    Great psychological warfare to distract from the fact that Ukraine has not had a victory since November and with a fresh force of superbly equipped and trained ten brigades to play with has nowhere got through or even to the first line of Russian defences on the ground north of Crimea that has been the major Russian gain of the SMO still held to date.

    The Nazis took Ukraine in a month and Russia never fully took Bakhmut over nearly a year. A former city of 70k that is now in ruin. When this war started we were told that Russia would crush Ukraine within weeks.

    But I agree that the Prigozhin situation is excellent psychological warfare. It will absolutely undermine the Russian State TV narrative of Putin being in control of the situation. Thank you very much Prigozhin for donating your services to Ukraine. You are humiliating Putin and Russia. Well done.

    As for the offensive it is too early to judge. Offensives of this scale in modern warfare normally take months. We haven't seen the bulk of the armored attacks and the Kremlin is lying about destroying 60 leopards. They would constantly show images of them on State TV if that were true.

    Russia has heavily mined defensives and anyone expecting some quick march on Melitopol like the movies really doesn't understand how modern warfare works. There however is still very much the potential for a Russian rout so it is really just something to watch at this point.

    Kiev decided to launch on of their Storm Shadow missiles, actually the lighter payload French one (maybe more difficult to shoot down) on a key Crimean road link bridge

    It definitely needs to be hit again.

    I think Ukraine leadership, military equipment and army will be slowly but surely written down that order. Rely on it, a precision assassination of someone in Zelensky’s circle is coming in retaliation.

    Ritter and MacGregor have told us that Ukraine is weeks away from capitulation for over a year. Larry C Johnson and Moon of Alabama told us that Prigozhin was just an elaborate play by Putin.

    This war is simply not going well for Russia. I don't see why it is so difficult for Putin's defenders to make this simple admission. They seem to have a weird alpha male attachment to him like Africans and their Big Man leaders. It's really creepy. I openly support Ukraine but that doesn't mean I have some weird attachment to Zelensky. I think he has done a fine job but I've also been critical of him in numerous areas. He made a huge mistake early in the war by not putting the military on defense in the north.

    Replies: @A123, @Sean, @Wokechoke

    I openly support Ukraine but that doesn’t mean I have some weird attachment to Zelensky. I think he has done a fine job but I’ve also been critical of him in numerous areas. He made a huge mistake early in the war by not putting the military on defense in the north

    He didn’t think Putin would dare go for a full on invasion targeting Kiev, that Russia would think it worth it, or be able to sustain it. It is unclear why, because Ukraine is not a member of Nato, and even with arms from US and its allies, Ukraine cannot match the firepower of Russian artillery.

    This war is simply not going well for Russia.

    Yes it is going about as badly for Russia as it could. Yet that is not all that bad because Russia is too big for Ukraine to destroy. Russia can be hurt by Ukraine but it cannot be destroyed or stopped by it. So given that Russia has the resources, nothing else it needs to be doing at the moment, and Putin intent on finishing what he started, it is merely a matter of time before Ukraine is wrecked and half the size it was when Zelensky was elected.

    • Replies: @Greasy William
    @Sean

    1. Ukraine being reduced in size by half is a good thing for Ukraine, as it removes the Russophilic regions which should never have been part of Ukraine in the first place
    2. Any independent Ukrainian state existing after the end of hostilities can only be seen as a huge victory for Ukraine and a near catastrophic defeat for Russia

    As for Zelensky, given his heritage, I want to like him but he just rubs me the wrong way. He appears to have a messiah complex along with delusions of grandeur and he has repeatedly demonstrated a very grating sense of entitlement; supposedly even Biden told him to stop being such an ungrateful, whiny bitch.

    Also, Zelensky is a shameless apologists for Nazi war criminals. I know he kinda doesn't have a choice given the circumstances but still.

    Replies: @AP

  267. @Sean
    @John Johnson


    I openly support Ukraine but that doesn’t mean I have some weird attachment to Zelensky. I think he has done a fine job but I’ve also been critical of him in numerous areas. He made a huge mistake early in the war by not putting the military on defense in the north
     
    He didn't think Putin would dare go for a full on invasion targeting Kiev, that Russia would think it worth it, or be able to sustain it. It is unclear why, because Ukraine is not a member of Nato, and even with arms from US and its allies, Ukraine cannot match the firepower of Russian artillery.

    This war is simply not going well for Russia.
     
    Yes it is going about as badly for Russia as it could. Yet that is not all that bad because Russia is too big for Ukraine to destroy. Russia can be hurt by Ukraine but it cannot be destroyed or stopped by it. So given that Russia has the resources, nothing else it needs to be doing at the moment, and Putin intent on finishing what he started, it is merely a matter of time before Ukraine is wrecked and half the size it was when Zelensky was elected.

    Replies: @Greasy William

    1. Ukraine being reduced in size by half is a good thing for Ukraine, as it removes the Russophilic regions which should never have been part of Ukraine in the first place
    2. Any independent Ukrainian state existing after the end of hostilities can only be seen as a huge victory for Ukraine and a near catastrophic defeat for Russia

    As for Zelensky, given his heritage, I want to like him but he just rubs me the wrong way. He appears to have a messiah complex along with delusions of grandeur and he has repeatedly demonstrated a very grating sense of entitlement; supposedly even Biden told him to stop being such an ungrateful, whiny bitch.

    Also, Zelensky is a shameless apologists for Nazi war criminals. I know he kinda doesn’t have a choice given the circumstances but still.

    • Replies: @AP
    @Greasy William

    The idea that half of Ukraine is Russophile is false. The Russophile parts left in 2014.

    Dividing Ukraine in hand would just condemn millions of Ukrainians to Russian rule.

    This just happened in the occupied Crimean corridor. Two 16 year old kids (one, an ethnic Armenian) shot and killed a collaborator policeman and a Russian soldier, before being killed themselves. Last recorded words were Glory to Ukraine. It’s like Galicia under recent Soviet occupation (one of my father’s older cousins died while fighting Soviet soldiers in 1945, at the same age).



    https://twitter.com/gerashchenko_en/status/1672932328170045441?s=46&t=Qz3eXZWFYIvyHmaAk32tcg

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Sean, @QCIC

  268. @silviosilver
    @Yahya


    All nations shall eventually bend the knee to Muhammad
     
    Given the choice, I'd prefer to flash him a moony.

    How islamic are you anyway? I think I recall you saying you're an apostate, but how clean was the break?

    Replies: @Greasy William, @Yahya

    How islamic are you anyway? I think I recall you saying you’re an apostate, but how clean was the break?

    Well I don’t recall mentioning that at all, and I’d prefer not to comment on my religious views on this forum. I’ll just say that Islam is the faith of my ancestors (and I suppose Christianity and Judaism too, but these are too old for me to care about) so I have an emotional attachment to it.

    I’m still amazed at the foresight and perspicacity of Big Mo and his companions.

    They did everything right to build Islam into a resilient, self-perpetuating religion.

    – Patriarchal orientation
    – In-breeding patterns
    – Supremacy of religious identity
    – Corporal punishment for apostasy

    And most pleasingly, they have constructed it such that Arabs would forever remain the Herrenvolk of the faith. Other groups may gain technological, demographic or military supremacy for a period of time, but the faithful must inevitably march to the tune of Muhammad’s peeps. Thats why the religion is still associated with Arabs, despite constituting only 25% of the world’s Muslims (interesting fact: there are more people in Indonesia + Bangladesh than the entire Arab world). It also underlies the Turco-Persian seething and coping.

    • Replies: @silviosilver
    @Yahya


    Well I don’t recall mentioning that at all, and I’d prefer not to comment on my religious views on this forum
     
    Actually, "secular" is how I think you described yourself.

    Believe it or not, I've tried very hard on numerous occasions to find something to like about islam, but I have failed every time. Ethnically and religiously, it is the historical enemy, and the weight of that memory dominates my attitude to it. And in its cultural aspects, it embodies everything I detest about religion-as-we-know-it: superstition, dogmatism, intolerance, thought-control, supremacy, hostility.

    I used the clunky phrase religion-as-we-know-it, because I am very favorably disposed to the idea of religion (spirituality etc) - just not the ones that we have. What a curse it is that the caucasoid world's brains responsible for all the brilliant art, architecture, literature, music, science, engineering throughout the ages could do no better than a bunch of silly sand fables when it comes to religion.

    This is also why I vacillate when it comes to Christianity, never completely abandoning it but never completely embracing it either. I figure if you're going to be religious, it's much easier to plug into an existing system than go it alone. You just have to learn to ignore the stupid shit (tons of it) and learn not to expect too much from the people at church (because they're as frail as anyone else and disappointment is guaranteed).

    , @Another Polish Perspective
    @Yahya


    – In-breeding patterns
     
    Cousin marriage are not part of Quran, and - as in the Old Testament - are not really permitted for believers. The permission to marry cousins is actually an interpretation derived from Surah Nisa Verse 22-24, which concerns... dowry (whereas previous excluding verses speak nothing about dowry - it is hard to belief that the Word of God changes its orientation to such materialism so fast)

    "And lawful to you are [all others] beyond these, [provided] that you seek them [in marriage] with [gifts from] your property, desiring chastity, not unlawful sexual intercourse. "

    However, Surah Ahzab 33:50 bans cousins marriage for anyone except Muhammand himself:

    "O Prophet, indeed We have made lawful to you your wives to whom you have given their due compensation and those your right hand possesses from what Allah has returned to you [of captives] and the daughters of your paternal uncles and the daughters of your paternal aunts and the daughters of your maternal uncles and the daughters of your maternal aunts who emigrated with you and a believing woman if she gives herself to the Prophet [and] if the Prophet wishes to marry her, [this is] only for you, excluding the [other] believers. We certainly know what We have made obligatory upon them concerning their wives and those their right hands possess, [but this is for you] in order that there will be upon you no discomfort. "
    t
    That Nisa and not Ahzab became binding fiqh interpretation clearly states the power of people obsessed with preserving maternal bloodlines (cousin marriages conserve chromosome X, which, unlike chromosome Y, recombines).

    Similar situation is in Judaism and Christianity where general ban on cousin ("kin") marriage from Leviticus 18:6 was said to non-exist because later verses mention banned relations more specifically (however, not only with kin, so it cannot be said to be lex specialis of the previous general kin ban).

  269. @Greasy William
    @Beckow


    And US’s goal is to ultimately control every square inch of the earth’s surface
     
    This is true. Hence this war is a defeat for the US, like I said.

    And your goal is…you see how silly that is?
     
    My goal is to destroy the United States and take revenge on white liberals. Although I guess that's actually two goals. But it is certainly not silly to believe that is what I want because I myself have repeatedly made as much clear.

    Similarly, everyone who isn't a die hard Russophile understands that the current Russian regime sees Ukraine as an inherent part of the Russian Motherland that was wrongfully torn away. And it is clear that Putin and co have always sought to "reunite" all of the lost "Russian" lands.


    Russia has been very clear about its goals: no Nato in Ukraine and normal human rights for Russians in Ukraine. Maybe they are lying and the real goal is to conquer everything to Sardinia.
     
    They are lying. The goal was and remains to end Ukraine as a nation. They view the Ukrainian state as an illegitimate, colonial Western project meant to weaken and ultimately dismember Russia. If you don't see things that way, fine; you're still wrong, though. Reality is what it is.

    Is “Russia” a person with unchangeable permanent goals?
     
    The Putin regime essentially is. Putin and those around him are practical men. I am certain that they are, or at least were, willing to work with Ukraine/NATO on peaceful solutions for the various disputes regarding Russia/Ukraine. However, they would always see Ukraine to be as illegitimate as China sees Taiwan and Russia would ultimately always be willing to use force to conquer the country as soon as it was practical to do so.

    If your point is that with better statecraft that the US and Ukraine could have prevented this war, I think that you are probably correct. It's also possible that if the war was pushed off long enough, Russia may have eventually changed it's attitude towards Ukraine and true peace based on mutual recognition could have been achieved. But that isn't what we're talking about here.


    You and that fellow ‘Strelkov?” can have a nice bitch-fest about it
     
    Without Strelkov, Ukraine would still control Crimea and the entire Donbas. He isn't just some nobody yapping on the internet. He's a bad guy and I'm certainly not saying he's infallible, but his reading of events shouldn't be summarily dismissed.

    And for the record, when the rest of the pro Russian internet brigade was praising Prigozhin as some super soldier, badass, Russian ultra patriot, Strelkov was sounding the alarm that Prigozhin was actually a loose cannon who was only out for himself. When this coup was launched, Strelkov immediately leapt to the defense of Putin, a man who he despises.

    You are free to ignore what Strelkov says, but you are only doing yourself a disservice.

    Replies: @Beckow, @Wokechoke, @Mr. Hack

    They are lying. The goal was and remains to end Ukraine as a nation. They view the Ukrainian state as an illegitimate, colonial Western project meant to weaken and ultimately dismember Russia. If you don’t see things that way, fine; you’re still wrong, though. Reality is what it is…However, they would always see Ukraine to be as illegitimate as China sees Taiwan and Russia would ultimately always be willing to use force to conquer the country as soon as it was practical to do so.

    I’m in basic agreement with your here. Most of the readers of this blog don’t really understand this, or if they do, they don’t really care. So, for Ukrainians, the threat of total annihilation and genocide is very real, and goes a long way in explaining the overall success they’ve experienced on the battlefield.It’s basically a “do or die situation” for Ukrainians. It’s heartening to see that at least one non-Ukrainian that takes a part in this blog seems to really understand these things.

  270. In Moscow smoking rooms, two versions of what is actually hidden behind the Wagner PMC campaign against Moscow are being discussed.

    Source #1: “Prigozhin is extremely devoted to Putin. One of the beneficiaries of PMC Wagner is Dyumin, Putin’s former personal bodyguard. Putin first PUBLICLY promises to severely punish Prigozhin, and then forgives. All these components suggest that reality may not be the same as we saw it. Play. And Putin now has the opportunity to get rid of the generals, including Shoigu, who in other circumstances he could not remove due to personal friendships, his own obligations and obligations to friends. Yes, and in general, there is a lot of room for personnel shake-up. The march showed who is who in his environment.

    Source No. 2: “It is persistently said that before the march, Prigozhin could not meet with Putin for two months, despite repeated attempts. Putin’s entourage, which supports Shoigu, blocked all these attempts. And all this time, measures were really being prepared to destroy part of Wagner and Prigozhin himself. Prigogine had no other choice. He expected that after the start of the march, Putin would take his side. But Shoigu, having hurriedly left Rostov, managed to quickly get to Putin, who, as you know, is extremely receptive to information received by “ears”. And only after Putin’s conversation with a potential successor and Dyumin, who is very close to him, did the situation turn against Shoigu and Gerasimov.

    https://t.me/vchkogpu/39493

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @sudden death

    I’m trying my best to figure out why this Bakhmut Battle is of such significance to observers.

    The Ukie offensive was stopped cold by a massive engineering works, which has to be Shoigu’s brainchild as he is the civil engineer minded Russian. Huge earthworks, flooded river basins etc and mine belts that Vauban or Da Vinci might have cooked up.


    https://paulhumphriesriverecology.wordpress.com/2013/02/05/leonardo-da-vinci-water-rivers-science-and-art-part-1/


    I pointed out during the Donets River crossings in late spring 2022 that the Russians would do terraforming hydrology to keep and hold and expand land. If the Russians blew up the Dam, surely that was Shoigu’s idea, work and decision?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_Operations_Forces_(Russia)

    Annexing Crimea was done by this organisation. About Shoigu.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sergei_Shoigu


    In 1991, Yeltsin appointed him head of the newly established Russian Rescue Corps, responsible for the rescue and disaster response system. The Rescue Corps replaced the previous Soviet civil defense system and soon absorbed the 20,000-strong militarized Civil Defense Troops of the Ministry of Defense, with Shoigu being appointed chairman of the State Committee of the Russian Federation for Civil Defense, Emergency Situations, and Disaster Response. Civil Defense remained a quasi-military organization in continuation of Soviet practice and Shoigu was politically involved, such as an unsuccessful attempt to evacuate Russian-backed Afghan President Mohammad Najibullah in 1992 and the intended distribution of weapons from the Civil Defense stocks to Yeltsin supporters during the October 1993 coup. In keeping with the militarized nature of Russian civil defense, Shoigu received the rank of major general in 1993,[11] and was promoted swiftly to lieutenant general in 1995,[12] colonel general in 1998,[13] and to army general, in practice the highest Russian military rank, in 2003.[14] The committee was renamed the Ministry of Emergency Situations (MChS) in 1994, making Shoigu a government minister. He became popular because of his hands-on management style and high visibility during emergency situations, such as floods, earthquakes and acts of terrorism.[7] Under Shoigu, the responsibilities of the ministry were expanded to take over the Russian State Fire Service in 2002, making the MChS Russia's third-largest force structure.[15]

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

  271. @Yahya
    @silviosilver


    How islamic are you anyway? I think I recall you saying you’re an apostate, but how clean was the break?
     
    Well I don’t recall mentioning that at all, and I’d prefer not to comment on my religious views on this forum. I’ll just say that Islam is the faith of my ancestors (and I suppose Christianity and Judaism too, but these are too old for me to care about) so I have an emotional attachment to it.

    I’m still amazed at the foresight and perspicacity of Big Mo and his companions.

    They did everything right to build Islam into a resilient, self-perpetuating religion.

    - Patriarchal orientation
    - In-breeding patterns
    - Supremacy of religious identity
    - Corporal punishment for apostasy

    And most pleasingly, they have constructed it such that Arabs would forever remain the Herrenvolk of the faith. Other groups may gain technological, demographic or military supremacy for a period of time, but the faithful must inevitably march to the tune of Muhammad’s peeps. Thats why the religion is still associated with Arabs, despite constituting only 25% of the world’s Muslims (interesting fact: there are more people in Indonesia + Bangladesh than the entire Arab world). It also underlies the Turco-Persian seething and coping.

    Replies: @silviosilver, @Another Polish Perspective

    Well I don’t recall mentioning that at all, and I’d prefer not to comment on my religious views on this forum

    Actually, “secular” is how I think you described yourself.

    Believe it or not, I’ve tried very hard on numerous occasions to find something to like about islam, but I have failed every time. Ethnically and religiously, it is the historical enemy, and the weight of that memory dominates my attitude to it. And in its cultural aspects, it embodies everything I detest about religion-as-we-know-it: superstition, dogmatism, intolerance, thought-control, supremacy, hostility.

    I used the clunky phrase religion-as-we-know-it, because I am very favorably disposed to the idea of religion (spirituality etc) – just not the ones that we have. What a curse it is that the caucasoid world’s brains responsible for all the brilliant art, architecture, literature, music, science, engineering throughout the ages could do no better than a bunch of silly sand fables when it comes to religion.

    This is also why I vacillate when it comes to Christianity, never completely abandoning it but never completely embracing it either. I figure if you’re going to be religious, it’s much easier to plug into an existing system than go it alone. You just have to learn to ignore the stupid shit (tons of it) and learn not to expect too much from the people at church (because they’re as frail as anyone else and disappointment is guaranteed).

  272. Hints of achieved quick intra-Wagner split, once again need to be reminded Prigozhin was Putin’s acquintance from Petersburg times and not a founder of Wagner, like Utkin:

    The bald nonentity destroyed the Wagner PMC with his own hands. And framed everyone whomever he could. The assault on Moscow had to be led personally by Dmitry Utkin. He rode in one of the columns. Why it was necessary to start everything if you were blown away on the first day is definitely not clear. Again, it turned out to be just a senseless and merciless riot.

    Preparations for what happened were in advance. Everyone was instructed what to do and how to do it. As a result, a politician with now very dubious prospects managed to show just for one day and not more. The task was to provoke the evacuation of top officials and leadership from Moscow. Then start occupying the buildings of the ministries. The plans were grandiose. In fact, a politician with now very dubious prospects was blown away in one day. It’s kind of a shame.

    Now Prigozhin forever in my blog is a dirty word. A nominal example of how you can screw up everything because of your own cowardice and insignificance.

    https://t.me/s/apwagner

    • Replies: @sudden death
    @sudden death

    Visual illustration of this, judging strictly just from the surface so far;)

    https://twitter.com/BDeMayo/status/1673034622286938112

  273. @Sean
    @Mikhail

    There is certainly no comparison with the French WW1 mutinies, or rather strikes, which were due to huge casualties, and disappointment at the Americans troops not shouldering much more of line as had been expected . A possible similarity is they usually started with troops getting drunk (Prigozhin is a drinker). The Germans did not know about it, luckily for France.

    Had Ukraine mounted an attack as soon as the Wagner revolt column drive became publically known , great things might have been achieves. For all their vaunted adaptability they are not agile enough to take advantage of such opportunities. Both sides in this war have become defence orientated and very ponderous. The breaching doctrine of combined arms as all militaries were theoretical experts has had its shortcomings in practice cruelly exposed.

    The Wagner revolt was prolly sparked by the ruling from the Kremlin that all Wagner personnel must sign contracts with the regular army by July. That was going to be a huge hit to their wallets, but they are now going to get more money, which seems fair as they are specialized assault infantry.


    The optics of Prigozhin’s action serve the interests of Russia’s adversaries with the Russian government lax in addressing his insubordination.
     
    The optics of the Bakhmut victory were obscured by PR in the West, but the fact is it was a concrete defeat for Ukraine of real importance for the morale of Ukrainian soldiers.

    Prigozhin's Wagnerites-with-a-soaking-up-enemy firepower-screen-of-expendable convicts set up was ready, willing and able to successfully advance into cities with high buildings: what had been urban death traps for attackers. The regular Russian army even the VDV, was not so great at that. I believe the Zpenal bataions are going to be regular army from now on So Wagner work is done; they have pioneered new methods, which the regular army will now use and also take over all the troops with experienced in them, who will be paid in accordance with their proven skills. None of that is good news for Ukraine, which has not had a victory since November.

    Replies: @Wokechoke

    The Rohr Battalion in ww1 had this function for the Germans. Special weapons and lavish pay plus experimental tactics.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assault_Battalion_No._5_(Rohr)

    The Australians were to become something similar for the British and Imperial forces in 1917-18 on the western front. That’s after the mixed bag of valour and ineptitude they displayed in Gallipoli as ANZACs. They were given more pay, light machine guns, smgs, stokes mortars, rifle grenades than other British American or French formations.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Corps

    Oddly General Monash, the Corps commander was a Jew of Prussian origins.

  274. @sudden death

    In Moscow smoking rooms, two versions of what is actually hidden behind the Wagner PMC campaign against Moscow are being discussed.

    Source #1: “Prigozhin is extremely devoted to Putin. One of the beneficiaries of PMC Wagner is Dyumin, Putin's former personal bodyguard. Putin first PUBLICLY promises to severely punish Prigozhin, and then forgives. All these components suggest that reality may not be the same as we saw it. Play. And Putin now has the opportunity to get rid of the generals, including Shoigu, who in other circumstances he could not remove due to personal friendships, his own obligations and obligations to friends. Yes, and in general, there is a lot of room for personnel shake-up. The march showed who is who in his environment.

    Source No. 2: “It is persistently said that before the march, Prigozhin could not meet with Putin for two months, despite repeated attempts. Putin's entourage, which supports Shoigu, blocked all these attempts. And all this time, measures were really being prepared to destroy part of Wagner and Prigozhin himself. Prigogine had no other choice. He expected that after the start of the march, Putin would take his side. But Shoigu, having hurriedly left Rostov, managed to quickly get to Putin, who, as you know, is extremely receptive to information received by "ears". And only after Putin's conversation with a potential successor and Dyumin, who is very close to him, did the situation turn against Shoigu and Gerasimov.
     
    https://t.me/vchkogpu/39493

    Replies: @Wokechoke

    I’m trying my best to figure out why this Bakhmut Battle is of such significance to observers.

    The Ukie offensive was stopped cold by a massive engineering works, which has to be Shoigu’s brainchild as he is the civil engineer minded Russian. Huge earthworks, flooded river basins etc and mine belts that Vauban or Da Vinci might have cooked up.

    https://paulhumphriesriverecology.wordpress.com/2013/02/05/leonardo-da-vinci-water-rivers-science-and-art-part-1/

    I pointed out during the Donets River crossings in late spring 2022 that the Russians would do terraforming hydrology to keep and hold and expand land. If the Russians blew up the Dam, surely that was Shoigu’s idea, work and decision?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_Operations_Forces_(Russia)

    Annexing Crimea was done by this organisation. About Shoigu.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sergei_Shoigu

    In 1991, Yeltsin appointed him head of the newly established Russian Rescue Corps, responsible for the rescue and disaster response system. The Rescue Corps replaced the previous Soviet civil defense system and soon absorbed the 20,000-strong militarized Civil Defense Troops of the Ministry of Defense, with Shoigu being appointed chairman of the State Committee of the Russian Federation for Civil Defense, Emergency Situations, and Disaster Response. Civil Defense remained a quasi-military organization in continuation of Soviet practice and Shoigu was politically involved, such as an unsuccessful attempt to evacuate Russian-backed Afghan President Mohammad Najibullah in 1992 and the intended distribution of weapons from the Civil Defense stocks to Yeltsin supporters during the October 1993 coup. In keeping with the militarized nature of Russian civil defense, Shoigu received the rank of major general in 1993,[11] and was promoted swiftly to lieutenant general in 1995,[12] colonel general in 1998,[13] and to army general, in practice the highest Russian military rank, in 2003.[14] The committee was renamed the Ministry of Emergency Situations (MChS) in 1994, making Shoigu a government minister. He became popular because of his hands-on management style and high visibility during emergency situations, such as floods, earthquakes and acts of terrorism.[7] Under Shoigu, the responsibilities of the ministry were expanded to take over the Russian State Fire Service in 2002, making the MChS Russia’s third-largest force structure.[15]

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @Wokechoke


    intended distribution of weapons from the Civil Defense stocks to Yeltsin supporters during the October 1993 coup.
     
    Yes and that is why I hate the man.

    I would feel good if Prigozhin's and Dyumin's antics yesterday, would leave Shoigu and his group with a blooded nose. It's about time he retires and goes fishing on some pristine river in the Tuvan Taiga.
  275. @John Johnson
    @Sean

    Great psychological warfare to distract from the fact that Ukraine has not had a victory since November and with a fresh force of superbly equipped and trained ten brigades to play with has nowhere got through or even to the first line of Russian defences on the ground north of Crimea that has been the major Russian gain of the SMO still held to date.

    The Nazis took Ukraine in a month and Russia never fully took Bakhmut over nearly a year. A former city of 70k that is now in ruin. When this war started we were told that Russia would crush Ukraine within weeks.

    But I agree that the Prigozhin situation is excellent psychological warfare. It will absolutely undermine the Russian State TV narrative of Putin being in control of the situation. Thank you very much Prigozhin for donating your services to Ukraine. You are humiliating Putin and Russia. Well done.

    As for the offensive it is too early to judge. Offensives of this scale in modern warfare normally take months. We haven't seen the bulk of the armored attacks and the Kremlin is lying about destroying 60 leopards. They would constantly show images of them on State TV if that were true.

    Russia has heavily mined defensives and anyone expecting some quick march on Melitopol like the movies really doesn't understand how modern warfare works. There however is still very much the potential for a Russian rout so it is really just something to watch at this point.

    Kiev decided to launch on of their Storm Shadow missiles, actually the lighter payload French one (maybe more difficult to shoot down) on a key Crimean road link bridge

    It definitely needs to be hit again.

    I think Ukraine leadership, military equipment and army will be slowly but surely written down that order. Rely on it, a precision assassination of someone in Zelensky’s circle is coming in retaliation.

    Ritter and MacGregor have told us that Ukraine is weeks away from capitulation for over a year. Larry C Johnson and Moon of Alabama told us that Prigozhin was just an elaborate play by Putin.

    This war is simply not going well for Russia. I don't see why it is so difficult for Putin's defenders to make this simple admission. They seem to have a weird alpha male attachment to him like Africans and their Big Man leaders. It's really creepy. I openly support Ukraine but that doesn't mean I have some weird attachment to Zelensky. I think he has done a fine job but I've also been critical of him in numerous areas. He made a huge mistake early in the war by not putting the military on defense in the north.

    Replies: @A123, @Sean, @Wokechoke

    We don’t really know what was being funnelled in and out of Bahkmut over the period of the so called battle. Looks like Prigozhin was setting up a conduit for gear, personnel and cash transfers back n forth with Kiev. The swindler should be shot.

    Shoigu was probably watching closely via satellites to quantify the level of Prigozhid’s smuggling operation. We have some idea where the Pentagon’s 6 billion accounting error ended up after seeing the abortive Jew Coup.

    Prigozhid showed up personally in the city apparently under fire, almost certainly had promises from the CIA he was safe.

  276. @Wokechoke
    @Mr. XYZ

    In Celine’s epic book Journey To The End of The Night the author’s avatar Bardamu discusses the French Race with his chum Arthur Barnate. “They came from the four corners of the earth driven by hunger plague tumours and cold and stopped here. They could not go further because of the Ocean. That’s us the French.”

    “Correct Arthur! hateful and spineless raped and robbed mangled and witless they are as good as we are.”


    It’s well worth a read. A pre ww2 French writer describes France and America in between with a little of whites in Africa.

    You get to see Detroit prewar. Or at least read about it.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Emil Nikola Richard, @Wokechoke

    He was about as cheerful as Cormac McCarthey. Has anybody read it over and over?

    • Replies: @Another Polish Perspective
    @Emil Nikola Richard

    I read some fragments over and over (African episode, American episode, psychiatric hospital episode). In a way, they have certain hypnotic quality and some are pretty funny (psychiatric hospital episode especially, which is a bit like some Houllebecq writing, with main character, Bardamu, knowing that what is happening around is basically senseless and still participating in it; OTOH the African episode has certain traces of Conrad's "Heart of Darkness"). In general, I would qualify the book as tragicomedy.

    Replies: @Another Polish Perspective

  277. @Mr. XYZ
    @Dmitry

    After the year 1000, Eastern Europe was always considerably less accomplished, especially per capita, relative to Western Europe:

    https://inquisitivebird.substack.com/p/the-rise-of-the-west?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2

    https://inquisitivebird.substack.com/p/which-european-nations-are-overrepresented?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2

    https://inquisitivebird.substack.com/p/notable-people-in-science-europe?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2

    Some charts from the articles above:

    https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F1eafb23d-ca9e-4cbe-be7f-78a41f1acc0b_1267x893.png

    https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F1a30831c-dca0-4e66-a422-efe5c8fc42ce_1267x893.png

    https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fd3bf3d4c-6760-4907-83c8-15f88bf07580_1116x862.png

    https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fb18c8704-db1f-4db7-83ab-4e8593eff3d9_982x897.png

    https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fb843b075-0f17-4391-84b9-1105a1559234_791x910.png

    https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F325c23a4-9fe8-437e-9ac4-788521a0cace_815x599.png

    Expecting Europeans from outside of the Hajnal Line to take over the leadership of the West from within-Hajnal Line Europeans is just ridiculous! In ancient times, they could definitely compete, but not after the year 1000:

    https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Feb3dc420-ffc6-499c-996a-5f0258f5c4c2_1084x732.png

    That's from 700 BC to 1000 AD.

    https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F94dcf858-e57a-4e73-8c5f-3cffae2b3db5_1066x718.png

    https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F2030c2f9-c6e0-43a6-869b-6da3f71e0ee7_1066x718.png

    https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F12152984-8da5-4bfe-b593-58788d720c35_1066x718.png

    https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F0904bd02-9df7-4613-95c4-1a13077eaf29_1066x718.png

    https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F844a94b2-4bc9-466a-8bb0-50cabbf8a1a4_1066x718.png

    https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F9ec179a7-2499-4331-9fb8-72a9eef23d7e_1066x718.png

    https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fb5be2e9a-c192-44bd-bd23-2309d3d72115_1066x718.png

    https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fd851cb12-2dcd-4dac-853b-ea322872d321_1066x718.png

    I deeply regret that we don't live in a world where we can see what human accomplishment in Eastern Europe would have looked like without both Communism and Nazism, though.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @LondonBob, @songbird

    15 image posts without a “more” tag is a little much. Probably does not lend to stable threads going to 1000+.

    • Agree: Mr. Hack
    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @songbird

    Thanks! I'll try to remember to follow your advice from now on!

  278. @songbird
    Suspect that the real reason GR disdains the Greco-Roman agricultural writers is that he sees limited applicability in his own climatic zone.

    Has he considered, though, that both Aristotle and Virgil (who was born in Padua) gave very good advice about feeding salted herbage to milch cows? And what is true of milk must be true of manure?

    Replies: @songbird

    But I do think it is interesting to read descriptions of old breeds.

    Seems like varieties of cattle go back a ways. Egyptians depicted at least two breeds.

    IIRC, the movie Braveheart featured some cattle bred to have more traditional features. But I am uncertain to what extent they really resembled old cattle and what range of breeds are represented in such programs. I’d like to see them expanded and archeo DNA used.

    Supposedly, before the Normans arrived, most sheep in Ireland were black.

  279. @LondonBob
    @Mr. XYZ

    Eastern Europe imported large numbers of Germans to assist them in economic development, even today ethnic Germans are well represented in the Russian elite.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @Mr. XYZ

    Pierce Edmond De Lacy is my favourite Wild Geese story.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Lacy

    Make Crimea Irish again, that’s all have to say on the matter.

    • Replies: @S
    @Wokechoke

    At first I thought this de Lacey was a descendant of Anthony de Lucy (aka St Bees Man) whom had also fought in the Baltics, albeit in the 14th century.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/St_Bees_Man

    Apparently not, though maybe far back in Normandy prior to the Millennium the de Laceys and the de Lucys may have shared a common surname.

    Replies: @Wokechoke

  280. @AP
    @Ivashka the fool

    How nice this would be…

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

    The source of the Cheka-OGPU named the true beneficiaries of PMC Wagner – this is the current leadership of the Main Directorate of the General Staff (GRU) and the former bodyguard of Putin, the governor of the Tula region, Alexei Dyumin.

    “Wagner” as a military organization was created and managed by GRU officers from among retirees and active military personnel. It was the Wagner that was used and is being used to fulfill the targets of the GRU. Of particular note is the governor of the Tula region, Alexei Dyumin, whose contribution to the development of PMC Wagner is the most significant. Dyumin communicates directly with Prigozhin, within which the latter acts more as a junior business partner. It is also noteworthy that Dyumin’s bodyguards are active members of the GRU special forces (military personnel of the military unit with the symbolic military unit number 45678), and not members of the FSO, as it should be for the governor, – said the source of the Cheka-OGPU. – Prigozhin just happened to be in the right place at the right time and with the right connections. His unofficial status allows him to lead the PMC and develop the brand, advertising it to the whole world at the expense of the war, which the current leadership of the GRU and the governor of the Tula region cannot do. Regardless of how the war ends, the beneficiaries of PMC Wagner find themselves in a positive financial balance with the prospect of many contracts around the world.

    https://t.me/vchkogpu/37147

    [MORE]

    Dyumin, Aleksey Gennadievich (in the photo he is holding a standard) – I believe most of you first heard this surname yesterday, when many Z-bloggers froze with the hope that someone would finally replace the disgusted Marshal of Victory.

    Let’s briefly go over his biography (I note that it was compiled from open sources and cannot be verified):
    – his father, a general, was in the inner circle of Pasha “Mercedes” Grachev (Pasha is also known as the author of the meme “take Grozny with one airborne regiment in two hours”);
    – his brother is a businessman, general director of the Olimpiysky sports complex and a developer of many objects;
    – graduated from the Voronezh School of Radio Electronics, since 1995 served in the FSO, where he organized communications for Yeltsin and Chernomyrdin;
    – since 1999 – in the Presidential Security Service;
    – since 2008 – Putin’s adjutant (when he was chairman of the government);
    – since 2012 – deputy. Head of the Presidential Security Service;
    – since 2014 – deputy. head of the GRU, commander of the special operations forces, according to the authors of the film “Crimea. The Way to the Homeland”, played a key role in the annexation of the peninsula and the evacuation of Yanukovych. Presumably, for this he received the “Hero of Russia”;
    – since 2015 – Chief of the Main Staff of the Ground Forces;
    – since December 2015 – deputy. the Minister of Defense;
    – from February 2016 to this day – all of a sudden, the governor of the Tula region (what a turn!). There were no public corruption scandals associated with him, although his assistant was arrested for embezzlement on an especially large scale.

    A number of experts called him one of three possible (together with Medvedev and Sobyanin) Putin’s successors.

    Summing up, in the event of his possible appointment as Minister of Defense of the Russian Federation (by the way, unlikely, since after the Prigozhin rebellion, removing Shoigu for Putin means showing weakness), his personal devotion to Putin is primary, and not his professional qualities as a military man (at least due to the lack of appropriate education and/or combat experience).

    https://t.me/m0sc0wcalling/26233

    Also interesting (in Russian):

    https://t.me/specnaz_com/6418

    Which perhaps contributed to what I link below:

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/06/23/obama-ukraine-russia-putin-crimea-kyiv-2014-moscow-us-presi/

    https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/russia-mercenary-threat-revives-concern-over-nuclear-arsenal-security-2023-06-24/

    https://www.zerohedge.com/political/msm-betrays-biden-regime-savages-spoxs-over-corruption-bombshells

    If that is indeed a result of this operation, then it was a brilliant operation. Wouldn’t be surprising from the man (Dyumin) who supervised the taking of Crimea in 2014.

    Brilliant, amazingly brilliant.

    I usually decry everything that is done in RusFed, but this was good. Except the pilots that got killed, but even that was a show of force: “We can down military planes, while you are frayerà, you will swallow and humbly wipe your mouths after the act.”

    Everything as the “deep people” likes, all the intellectualisations non-withstanding.

  281. @Yahya
    @silviosilver


    How islamic are you anyway? I think I recall you saying you’re an apostate, but how clean was the break?
     
    Well I don’t recall mentioning that at all, and I’d prefer not to comment on my religious views on this forum. I’ll just say that Islam is the faith of my ancestors (and I suppose Christianity and Judaism too, but these are too old for me to care about) so I have an emotional attachment to it.

    I’m still amazed at the foresight and perspicacity of Big Mo and his companions.

    They did everything right to build Islam into a resilient, self-perpetuating religion.

    - Patriarchal orientation
    - In-breeding patterns
    - Supremacy of religious identity
    - Corporal punishment for apostasy

    And most pleasingly, they have constructed it such that Arabs would forever remain the Herrenvolk of the faith. Other groups may gain technological, demographic or military supremacy for a period of time, but the faithful must inevitably march to the tune of Muhammad’s peeps. Thats why the religion is still associated with Arabs, despite constituting only 25% of the world’s Muslims (interesting fact: there are more people in Indonesia + Bangladesh than the entire Arab world). It also underlies the Turco-Persian seething and coping.

    Replies: @silviosilver, @Another Polish Perspective

    – In-breeding patterns

    Cousin marriage are not part of Quran, and – as in the Old Testament – are not really permitted for believers. The permission to marry cousins is actually an interpretation derived from Surah Nisa Verse 22-24, which concerns… dowry (whereas previous excluding verses speak nothing about dowry – it is hard to belief that the Word of God changes its orientation to such materialism so fast)

    “And lawful to you are [all others] beyond these, [provided] that you seek them [in marriage] with [gifts from] your property, desiring chastity, not unlawful sexual intercourse. ”

    However, Surah Ahzab 33:50 bans cousins marriage for anyone except Muhammand himself:

    “O Prophet, indeed We have made lawful to you your wives to whom you have given their due compensation and those your right hand possesses from what Allah has returned to you [of captives] and the daughters of your paternal uncles and the daughters of your paternal aunts and the daughters of your maternal uncles and the daughters of your maternal aunts who emigrated with you and a believing woman if she gives herself to the Prophet [and] if the Prophet wishes to marry her, [this is] only for you, excluding the [other] believers. We certainly know what We have made obligatory upon them concerning their wives and those their right hands possess, [but this is for you] in order that there will be upon you no discomfort. ”
    t
    That Nisa and not Ahzab became binding fiqh interpretation clearly states the power of people obsessed with preserving maternal bloodlines (cousin marriages conserve chromosome X, which, unlike chromosome Y, recombines).

    Similar situation is in Judaism and Christianity where general ban on cousin (“kin”) marriage from Leviticus 18:6 was said to non-exist because later verses mention banned relations more specifically (however, not only with kin, so it cannot be said to be lex specialis of the previous general kin ban).

    • Thanks: Yahya
  282. AP says:
    @Greasy William
    @Sean

    1. Ukraine being reduced in size by half is a good thing for Ukraine, as it removes the Russophilic regions which should never have been part of Ukraine in the first place
    2. Any independent Ukrainian state existing after the end of hostilities can only be seen as a huge victory for Ukraine and a near catastrophic defeat for Russia

    As for Zelensky, given his heritage, I want to like him but he just rubs me the wrong way. He appears to have a messiah complex along with delusions of grandeur and he has repeatedly demonstrated a very grating sense of entitlement; supposedly even Biden told him to stop being such an ungrateful, whiny bitch.

    Also, Zelensky is a shameless apologists for Nazi war criminals. I know he kinda doesn't have a choice given the circumstances but still.

    Replies: @AP

    The idea that half of Ukraine is Russophile is false. The Russophile parts left in 2014.

    Dividing Ukraine in hand would just condemn millions of Ukrainians to Russian rule.

    This just happened in the occupied Crimean corridor. Two 16 year old kids (one, an ethnic Armenian) shot and killed a collaborator policeman and a Russian soldier, before being killed themselves. Last recorded words were Glory to Ukraine. It’s like Galicia under recent Soviet occupation (one of my father’s older cousins died while fighting Soviet soldiers in 1945, at the same age).

    [MORE]

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @AP

    Poor kids dying for social engineering simulacra on both sides of the front. No human life should be lost for the preservation of either RusFed or Ukrostan. Actually, even animals shouldn't be hurt to preserve these two ugly social constructs.


    “On Friday evening, June 23, in Uzhgorod, in the restaurant “Three Aces”, the head of the counterintelligence department of the SBU, Panarin Andrei, along with his subordinates, were loud during the rest. At the same time, General Mikulin was in the institution, who had a meeting with Ruman Vayel, an assistant to the people's deputy from the ruling Servant of the People party Lyudmila Marchenko, and representatives of an international European organization. Mikulin made a remark to representatives of the counterintelligence of the SBU that they were behaving loudly. Those, without understanding, began to beat Mikulin, ”says the source.

    According to him, the counterintelligence officers did not stop there.

    “Having beaten Mikulin right in the institution, a group of counterintelligence officers took Mikulin to the forest, where they beat him again, knocked out his teeth and took away his iPhone 14 mobile phone”
     
    https://t.me/a_kaminsky/7835

    If you haven't read it, I suggest you have a look at:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Kid_from_Hell

    https://www.litres.ru/book/arkadiy-i-boris-strugackie/paren-iz-preispodney-23467378/chitat-onlayn/

    Kids should read this kind of books and learning to think, instead of being brainwashed to kill and get killed.

    There is more to life than fake and corrupt mafia states.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @AP

    , @Sean
    @AP


    The idea that half of Ukraine is Russophile is false. The Russophile parts left in 2014.
     
    It is very true that many Ukrainians who speak Russian are not ethnic Russians and were taught the language in school. But by the same token stopping Russian from being an officially approved language does not turn anyone into an ethnic Ukrainian.

    It’s like Galicia under recent Soviet occupation (one of my father’s older cousins died while fighting Soviet soldiers in 1945, at the same age).
     
    There was fighting for years after the war, and tens of thousand of deaths in the Ukraine and less bloody resistance bands lurked in the forests of Latvia for decades but it didn't change anything. The Soviets' did pull back from Austria though. Thereafter the Soviet's Warsaw Pact artillery and tank steamroller did not cross the line, but it did not back off from it either, and so there was a balance of forces with Nato. When the USSR did back off because Gorby could not see what all this ironmongery was achieving, the situation became dangerously fluid for RusFed. As Sachs says in the inteview above almost the instant Ukraine became independent people like Zbigniew Brzezinski were in OP EDs in the NYT advocating to have Ukraine in Nato within ten years as the final piece in a total secure structure for the West.


    Gorby was an agricultural production expert with not understanding of international relations. Sadly illogical though it may seem to idealists, in the real world--unless you are willing to give up being a man/nation-- you must give off 'bring it on' vibes' or you will be tested. You can't give ground because the other guy will push it as far as he can , which could lead to an unnecessary fight. Mearsheimer discusses how realism rules interactions in da ghetto when he discusses the article The Code Of The Streets in his book The Tragedy of Great Power Politics.

    Maybe Putin has taken Russia down a near suicidal path but he went down that path to avoid passively remaining in an inexorable ever less secure position, which ceaseless Nato maneuvering around Russia was putting it into; he doesn't see any other way. In the West they are increasingly talking about the danger of Russia going on to invade other counties if successful in Ukraine and then maybe actual Nato member ones so it has to be stopped in Ukraine. Which may be true now, all so unnecessary and yet so inevitable.


    http://www.martin-van-creveld.com/2336-2/

    I am not aware of any great power allowing the zone between its security-border and its capital to be cut by over half without engaging in massive bloodshed. Not ancient Assyria. Not Babylon, not Persia, not Athens, Sparta and Rome. Not China. All used might and main to crush would-be separatists, sometimes with success, sometimes not. More recently, the same applied to Spain, Portugal, Britain, France, and the Netherlands. The South’s attempt to secede led to the Civil War, AKA the War of Northern Aggression, which resulted in as many dead as did all of America’s remaining ones combined. As early as 1833, with a population of only 13,000,000 (including 2,000,000 slaves) the U.S had the unheard-of effrontery of claiming the entire Western hemisphere as its exclusive stamping ground.

    I know: It is mostly power and interest, not justice and morality, which govern relations between nations and states. So it has always been, and so it will always remain. But I think that what we can do, and what I myself have been trying to do in this essay, is get rid of some of the ira et studio. Both of the lies and the idea that one side is completely right and the other, completely wrong. Whatever else, doing so may make reaching some kind of agreement that much easier.
     

    The alternative is the ostensibly bring it on behavior done from defensive motives continues and action from one of of the parties elicits symmetrical response behaviors from the other party until there is direct hostilities, which neither are willing to lose. And that is international relations as a suicide pact.
    , @QCIC
    @AP

    The Western narrative on Ukraine sometimes treats it as a country along the lines of Poland which has a long, stand-alone history and a vastly different culture from Russia. In this narrative Russia simply attacked one day. Here at Unz it has been conclusively shown that neither of these points is accurate.

    The separation from Russia and recognition dreamed of by Ukrainian Nationalists might have happened organically given enough time. Unfortunately, outside forces arrayed against Russia offered these Nationalists a Faustian margin. The West dazzled them into believing they could have this recognition and independence immediately during their lifetimes. The bargain required them to attack their Slavic brethren in exchange for recognition. Sadly, by attacking their brethren on behalf of the West, they undermined much of their rationale for independence.

    All is not lost. At the moment, I don't think Russia really wants anything West of the river. Ukrainians may be able to salvage some of the dream if they focus on this land. To make it work they probably need to fully purge the NeoNAZI elements. Unfortunately, some Ukrainians may have difficulty releasing this warrior ideology.

  283. A123 says: • Website

    The Flash and Elemental Flop Disastrously

    The Flash @$140MM
    Elemental @$56MM

    Both of these were ~$200MM production budget. Between marketing and theatre’s share, the general rule is that it takes 2.5x times production to reach break even. Neither of these will reach $500MM. Elemental being a horrifying loss.

    And, Lucasfilm will be opening Indiana Jones and the Dial of Disrespect this weekend. The projections for that film, based on advance sales, look grim. Due to reshoots and other problems, its budget is officially stated as $300MM. Many believe its production cost is much higher.

    PEACE 😇

    • Replies: @Another Polish Perspective
    @A123

    Are you in movie business maybe...?

    If so, do you know where this idea of making movies from comic books about superheros IN SUCH A QUANTITY came from...?! It is like cosplay becoming mainstream movie making...

    Except Batman, majority of these movies are really cartoonish, if not downright ridiculous.

    Replies: @A123

  284. @Wokechoke
    @Mr. XYZ

    In Celine’s epic book Journey To The End of The Night the author’s avatar Bardamu discusses the French Race with his chum Arthur Barnate. “They came from the four corners of the earth driven by hunger plague tumours and cold and stopped here. They could not go further because of the Ocean. That’s us the French.”

    “Correct Arthur! hateful and spineless raped and robbed mangled and witless they are as good as we are.”


    It’s well worth a read. A pre ww2 French writer describes France and America in between with a little of whites in Africa.

    You get to see Detroit prewar. Or at least read about it.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Emil Nikola Richard, @Wokechoke

    it’s a funny book. I was mainly interested in it because Celine turned out to be a Modernist and Fascist. Also George MacDonald Frasers Flashman bears some resemblance to Bardamu.

    • Replies: @Coconuts
    @Wokechoke

    Not sure if Celine's writings about the Jewish issue have been translated into English, I heard they are not often reprinted in French. He was unusually single minded and uninhibited about this issue, like it was the only one that mattered in politics.

    Iirc Lucien Rabatet is the other main French Fascist author who shared Celine's pov.

    Replies: @Wokechoke

  285. @AP
    @Greasy William

    The idea that half of Ukraine is Russophile is false. The Russophile parts left in 2014.

    Dividing Ukraine in hand would just condemn millions of Ukrainians to Russian rule.

    This just happened in the occupied Crimean corridor. Two 16 year old kids (one, an ethnic Armenian) shot and killed a collaborator policeman and a Russian soldier, before being killed themselves. Last recorded words were Glory to Ukraine. It’s like Galicia under recent Soviet occupation (one of my father’s older cousins died while fighting Soviet soldiers in 1945, at the same age).



    https://twitter.com/gerashchenko_en/status/1672932328170045441?s=46&t=Qz3eXZWFYIvyHmaAk32tcg

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Sean, @QCIC

    Poor kids dying for social engineering simulacra on both sides of the front. No human life should be lost for the preservation of either RusFed or Ukrostan. Actually, even animals shouldn’t be hurt to preserve these two ugly social constructs.

    [MORE]

    “On Friday evening, June 23, in Uzhgorod, in the restaurant “Three Aces”, the head of the counterintelligence department of the SBU, Panarin Andrei, along with his subordinates, were loud during the rest. At the same time, General Mikulin was in the institution, who had a meeting with Ruman Vayel, an assistant to the people’s deputy from the ruling Servant of the People party Lyudmila Marchenko, and representatives of an international European organization. Mikulin made a remark to representatives of the counterintelligence of the SBU that they were behaving loudly. Those, without understanding, began to beat Mikulin, ”says the source.

    According to him, the counterintelligence officers did not stop there.

    “Having beaten Mikulin right in the institution, a group of counterintelligence officers took Mikulin to the forest, where they beat him again, knocked out his teeth and took away his iPhone 14 mobile phone”

    https://t.me/a_kaminsky/7835

    If you haven’t read it, I suggest you have a look at:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Kid_from_Hell

    https://www.litres.ru/book/arkadiy-i-boris-strugackie/paren-iz-preispodney-23467378/chitat-onlayn/

    Kids should read this kind of books and learning to think, instead of being brainwashed to kill and get killed.

    There is more to life than fake and corrupt mafia states.

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @Ivashka the fool

    Servant of the People party.


    Shabbos of (((The People))) Party


    These boys ought to have trekked out and joined a front line infantry unit controlled by Kiev. Not shoot cops. Cops will always survive wars institutionally. Their knowledge and skills are universal currency for the Landlord. Be the Landlord Russian, Jewish, English, Indian or Chinese.


    They could have carved out careers as soldiers instead of as hooligans.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

    , @AP
    @Ivashka the fool

    They did not die for Zelensky or those politicians most people haven’t heard of, but to get rid of the Russian occupiers. Same as my dad’s cousin.

  286. @Emil Nikola Richard
    @Wokechoke

    He was about as cheerful as Cormac McCarthey. Has anybody read it over and over?

    Replies: @Another Polish Perspective

    I read some fragments over and over (African episode, American episode, psychiatric hospital episode). In a way, they have certain hypnotic quality and some are pretty funny (psychiatric hospital episode especially, which is a bit like some Houllebecq writing, with main character, Bardamu, knowing that what is happening around is basically senseless and still participating in it; OTOH the African episode has certain traces of Conrad’s “Heart of Darkness”). In general, I would qualify the book as tragicomedy.

    • Replies: @Another Polish Perspective
    @Another Polish Perspective

    And the American episode I would compare to Ilja Erenburg "The Extraordinary Adventures of Julio Jurenito" without Julio Jurenito, and just one adventure, basically... the female lead of this adventure could be read as a parody of Henry James solemn female characters too....

  287. Forced myself to watch Pretty in Pink for the time-capsule (albeit Hollywood) part of it.

    [MORE]

    Most chick-flicky of the movies with John Hughes’s name attached. Don’t think it had much going for it other than the soundtrack (if you like that type of music.)

    Puzzled about the controversy involving the character Duckie. (I.e. the idea he was a beta that Ringwald’s character was exploiting.) Seemed obvious to me that he was supposed to be a homo seeking a beard.

    John Cryer is an obvious gay, even if he does not acknowledge it.

    The class aspect of the movie seemed really artificial to me. Had me wondering about the origin of the phrase “wrong side of the tracks” – whether it was really always about migration.

    To state one obvious fault: it is women that are hypergamous, not men.

    I don’t think class assortment (at least in a public school) has anything to do with awareness of money, so much as behaviors. Possibly, it would be different in some very elite private school, like Phillips Academy.

    But, anyway, most class (nonracial) segregation, IMO, occurs on the level of different towns, rather than neighborhoods.

    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @songbird

    I've got to help rescue you and get you back to more palatable faire. :-)

    I recently watched an old Disney classic, "20,000 Leagues Under the Sea" on YouTube based on the classic Jules Verne novel. It was as good as I remember seeing it some 50 years ago in our local movie theater (where I recently wrote about my experiences watching old Clint Eastwood spaghetti westerns). A great adaptation including James Mason, Kirk Douglas and perennial oddball Peter Lorre. It didn't hurt in the least that the whole adventurous faire was shot in glorious technicolor! Great escapist faire, good enough to be watched by the whole family!

    https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/o6wAAOSwtDNflL1Z/s-l1600.jpg
    Get your popcorn and favorite beverage, sit back and enjoy!

    Replies: @songbird

  288. @Another Polish Perspective
    @Emil Nikola Richard

    I read some fragments over and over (African episode, American episode, psychiatric hospital episode). In a way, they have certain hypnotic quality and some are pretty funny (psychiatric hospital episode especially, which is a bit like some Houllebecq writing, with main character, Bardamu, knowing that what is happening around is basically senseless and still participating in it; OTOH the African episode has certain traces of Conrad's "Heart of Darkness"). In general, I would qualify the book as tragicomedy.

    Replies: @Another Polish Perspective

    And the American episode I would compare to Ilja Erenburg “The Extraordinary Adventures of Julio Jurenito” without Julio Jurenito, and just one adventure, basically… the female lead of this adventure could be read as a parody of Henry James solemn female characters too….

  289. @Wokechoke
    @sudden death

    I’m trying my best to figure out why this Bakhmut Battle is of such significance to observers.

    The Ukie offensive was stopped cold by a massive engineering works, which has to be Shoigu’s brainchild as he is the civil engineer minded Russian. Huge earthworks, flooded river basins etc and mine belts that Vauban or Da Vinci might have cooked up.


    https://paulhumphriesriverecology.wordpress.com/2013/02/05/leonardo-da-vinci-water-rivers-science-and-art-part-1/


    I pointed out during the Donets River crossings in late spring 2022 that the Russians would do terraforming hydrology to keep and hold and expand land. If the Russians blew up the Dam, surely that was Shoigu’s idea, work and decision?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_Operations_Forces_(Russia)

    Annexing Crimea was done by this organisation. About Shoigu.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sergei_Shoigu


    In 1991, Yeltsin appointed him head of the newly established Russian Rescue Corps, responsible for the rescue and disaster response system. The Rescue Corps replaced the previous Soviet civil defense system and soon absorbed the 20,000-strong militarized Civil Defense Troops of the Ministry of Defense, with Shoigu being appointed chairman of the State Committee of the Russian Federation for Civil Defense, Emergency Situations, and Disaster Response. Civil Defense remained a quasi-military organization in continuation of Soviet practice and Shoigu was politically involved, such as an unsuccessful attempt to evacuate Russian-backed Afghan President Mohammad Najibullah in 1992 and the intended distribution of weapons from the Civil Defense stocks to Yeltsin supporters during the October 1993 coup. In keeping with the militarized nature of Russian civil defense, Shoigu received the rank of major general in 1993,[11] and was promoted swiftly to lieutenant general in 1995,[12] colonel general in 1998,[13] and to army general, in practice the highest Russian military rank, in 2003.[14] The committee was renamed the Ministry of Emergency Situations (MChS) in 1994, making Shoigu a government minister. He became popular because of his hands-on management style and high visibility during emergency situations, such as floods, earthquakes and acts of terrorism.[7] Under Shoigu, the responsibilities of the ministry were expanded to take over the Russian State Fire Service in 2002, making the MChS Russia's third-largest force structure.[15]

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

    intended distribution of weapons from the Civil Defense stocks to Yeltsin supporters during the October 1993 coup.

    Yes and that is why I hate the man.

    I would feel good if Prigozhin’s and Dyumin’s antics yesterday, would leave Shoigu and his group with a blooded nose. It’s about time he retires and goes fishing on some pristine river in the Tuvan Taiga.

  290. @songbird
    Forced myself to watch Pretty in Pink for the time-capsule (albeit Hollywood) part of it.

    Most chick-flicky of the movies with John Hughes's name attached. Don't think it had much going for it other than the soundtrack (if you like that type of music.)

    Puzzled about the controversy involving the character Duckie. (I.e. the idea he was a beta that Ringwald's character was exploiting.) Seemed obvious to me that he was supposed to be a homo seeking a beard.

    John Cryer is an obvious gay, even if he does not acknowledge it.

    The class aspect of the movie seemed really artificial to me. Had me wondering about the origin of the phrase "wrong side of the tracks" - whether it was really always about migration.

    To state one obvious fault: it is women that are hypergamous, not men.

    I don't think class assortment (at least in a public school) has anything to do with awareness of money, so much as behaviors. Possibly, it would be different in some very elite private school, like Phillips Academy.

    But, anyway, most class (nonracial) segregation, IMO, occurs on the level of different towns, rather than neighborhoods.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

    I’ve got to help rescue you and get you back to more palatable faire. 🙂

    I recently watched an old Disney classic, “20,000 Leagues Under the Sea” on YouTube based on the classic Jules Verne novel. It was as good as I remember seeing it some 50 years ago in our local movie theater (where I recently wrote about my experiences watching old Clint Eastwood spaghetti westerns). A great adaptation including James Mason, Kirk Douglas and perennial oddball Peter Lorre. It didn’t hurt in the least that the whole adventurous faire was shot in glorious technicolor! Great escapist faire, good enough to be watched by the whole family!

    [MORE]

    Get your popcorn and favorite beverage, sit back and enjoy!

    • Replies: @songbird
    @Mr. Hack

    Wanted to see that movie ever since I read the book as a boy. Finally managed it, last year. Suppose I should have posted my impressions when they were fresh.

    Definitely, a noteworthy sci-fi film. Of course, the squid scene is a very interesting one technically.

    For some reason, I felt like Kirk Douglas stood out a little too much. Something felt off about it, though I can't quite put my finger on it now. Perhaps, it is because the character has long existed in my imagination before I saw the movie? But I felt like somehow, it broke the fourth wall.

    Don't mind Douglas in other movies that I've seen, but I recall wondering at the time if Fleischman was trying to promote Douglas as a beefcake. Think I would have preferred a character actor or an unknown.

    Of the Verne adaptations, I think I enjoyed Journey to the Center of the Earth (1959, which also has Mason in it) more. But I also preferred that book.

  291. Elon Musk about the whole yesterday’s Wagnerite drama:

    [MORE]

  292. The US and the EU yesterday for the first time faced the situation of “post-Putin Russia”. US and German intelligence predicted the possibility of a military mutiny, but did not expect the Russian system to be so fragile. This caused “unrest in the leadership of the Western countries.” In fact, Washington, Paris, Berlin and Brussels were not ready for “post-Putin Russia”. Biden held constant consultations with allies; A “crisis information center” has been launched in the EU.
    The Pentagon has taken unprecedented measures to communicate with Russian colleagues regarding the safety of nuclear facilities.
    Military analysts are convinced that, under the influence of Western countries, the Armed Forces of Ukraine did not take advantage of the situation and did not make breakthroughs at the front.
    “Western countries are still analyzing the situation. Post-Putin Russia turned out to be too fast and unexpected. So far, two initiatives are known: US sanctions have been postponed against PMC Wagner; The West demands to strengthen the security of nuclear facilities in exchange for consultations with Kiev.

    https://t.me/rusbrief/130211

  293. @Ivashka the fool
    @AP

    Poor kids dying for social engineering simulacra on both sides of the front. No human life should be lost for the preservation of either RusFed or Ukrostan. Actually, even animals shouldn't be hurt to preserve these two ugly social constructs.


    “On Friday evening, June 23, in Uzhgorod, in the restaurant “Three Aces”, the head of the counterintelligence department of the SBU, Panarin Andrei, along with his subordinates, were loud during the rest. At the same time, General Mikulin was in the institution, who had a meeting with Ruman Vayel, an assistant to the people's deputy from the ruling Servant of the People party Lyudmila Marchenko, and representatives of an international European organization. Mikulin made a remark to representatives of the counterintelligence of the SBU that they were behaving loudly. Those, without understanding, began to beat Mikulin, ”says the source.

    According to him, the counterintelligence officers did not stop there.

    “Having beaten Mikulin right in the institution, a group of counterintelligence officers took Mikulin to the forest, where they beat him again, knocked out his teeth and took away his iPhone 14 mobile phone”
     
    https://t.me/a_kaminsky/7835

    If you haven't read it, I suggest you have a look at:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Kid_from_Hell

    https://www.litres.ru/book/arkadiy-i-boris-strugackie/paren-iz-preispodney-23467378/chitat-onlayn/

    Kids should read this kind of books and learning to think, instead of being brainwashed to kill and get killed.

    There is more to life than fake and corrupt mafia states.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @AP

    Servant of the People party.

    Shabbos of (((The People))) Party

    These boys ought to have trekked out and joined a front line infantry unit controlled by Kiev. Not shoot cops. Cops will always survive wars institutionally. Their knowledge and skills are universal currency for the Landlord. Be the Landlord Russian, Jewish, English, Indian or Chinese.

    They could have carved out careers as soldiers instead of as hooligans.

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @Wokechoke

    They could have grown up becoming doctors, painters, sculptors, poets, writers, scientists...

    They could have had families of their own, with healthy and happy children...

    But now they're dead.

    At least they died yelling "Glory to Ukraine" !

    Same for some young Russian Identitarians who got recently killed on the frontline. Twenty something idealistic young men, who volunteered for the active combat duty and got killed for what exactly?

    For corrupt and dysfunctional "states" such as RusFed and Ukrostan?

    I wonder if AP would agree for his sons to die in this disgusting conflict. Dying a useless death, while behind the scenes, Deep State psyop experts manipulate opinions and align social and economic outcomes on a geopolitical level.

    Just like they did yesterday.

    Replies: @AP, @Dmitry

  294. S says:
    @Wokechoke
    @LondonBob

    Pierce Edmond De Lacy is my favourite Wild Geese story.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Lacy

    Make Crimea Irish again, that's all have to say on the matter.

    Replies: @S

    At first I thought this de Lacey was a descendant of Anthony de Lucy (aka St Bees Man) whom had also fought in the Baltics, albeit in the 14th century.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/St_Bees_Man

    Apparently not, though maybe far back in Normandy prior to the Millennium the de Laceys and the de Lucys may have shared a common surname.

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @S

    There’s a Baron De Lacy in northern England.

  295. @Wokechoke
    @Ivashka the fool

    Servant of the People party.


    Shabbos of (((The People))) Party


    These boys ought to have trekked out and joined a front line infantry unit controlled by Kiev. Not shoot cops. Cops will always survive wars institutionally. Their knowledge and skills are universal currency for the Landlord. Be the Landlord Russian, Jewish, English, Indian or Chinese.


    They could have carved out careers as soldiers instead of as hooligans.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

    They could have grown up becoming doctors, painters, sculptors, poets, writers, scientists…

    They could have had families of their own, with healthy and happy children…

    But now they’re dead.

    At least they died yelling “Glory to Ukraine” !

    Same for some young Russian Identitarians who got recently killed on the frontline. Twenty something idealistic young men, who volunteered for the active combat duty and got killed for what exactly?

    For corrupt and dysfunctional “states” such as RusFed and Ukrostan?

    I wonder if AP would agree for his sons to die in this disgusting conflict. Dying a useless death, while behind the scenes, Deep State psyop experts manipulate opinions and align social and economic outcomes on a geopolitical level.

    Just like they did yesterday.

    • Replies: @AP
    @Ivashka the fool


    I wonder if AP would agree for his sons to die in this disgusting conflict
     
    If I was living under Russian occupation I’m not sure how I would feel about my sons choosing to bravely engage in armed resistance. I suspect I wouldn’t encourage them, and perhaps would selfishly try to convince them not to volunteer, but if they insisted on defending their homeland I wouldn’t get in their way, and I certainly would honor their heroism for the rest of my life if God forbid they fell in battle as these young heroes did.

    This and most conflicts are indeed disgusting, that doesn’t mean that the act of defending one’s homeland from the people invading it is disgusting. There’s a difference between fighting the occupiers and being one.

    On the other hand, I would oppose my sons going off to conquer Crimea or other lands that aren’t actually occupied.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Beckow, @Wokechoke

    , @Dmitry
    @Ivashka the fool


    Poor kids dying for social engineering simulacra
     
    This is the same of most wars in history. Do you think it was better to die in "Battle of Tannenberg"? "Battle of Tsushima"?
    http://tolstoy-lit.ru/tolstoy/publicistika/odumajtes.htm


    It's better, from perspective of ordinary people, to live as a computer scientists and doctor.

    But even to prioritize human rights and perspective of the ordinary people, in large overpopulated society created after invention of agriculture, this requires the installation of democratic societies, with balance of power, wide distribution of power, equal access for information, independent legal system, government as servants of the citizenry.

    Even with this, it's still possible for wars of the democracies. But if you don't have this change of power balance, then the decisions can easily prioritize self-interest of rulers who don't care about loss of some excess males from the population. Putin said, they could just die in accidents or alcoholism. https://www.pravda.com.ua/rus/news/2022/11/25/7377985/

    Replies: @AP

  296. @Mr. Hack
    @songbird

    I've got to help rescue you and get you back to more palatable faire. :-)

    I recently watched an old Disney classic, "20,000 Leagues Under the Sea" on YouTube based on the classic Jules Verne novel. It was as good as I remember seeing it some 50 years ago in our local movie theater (where I recently wrote about my experiences watching old Clint Eastwood spaghetti westerns). A great adaptation including James Mason, Kirk Douglas and perennial oddball Peter Lorre. It didn't hurt in the least that the whole adventurous faire was shot in glorious technicolor! Great escapist faire, good enough to be watched by the whole family!

    https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/o6wAAOSwtDNflL1Z/s-l1600.jpg
    Get your popcorn and favorite beverage, sit back and enjoy!

    Replies: @songbird

    Wanted to see that movie ever since I read the book as a boy. Finally managed it, last year. Suppose I should have posted my impressions when they were fresh.

    [MORE]

    Definitely, a noteworthy sci-fi film. Of course, the squid scene is a very interesting one technically.

    For some reason, I felt like Kirk Douglas stood out a little too much. Something felt off about it, though I can’t quite put my finger on it now. Perhaps, it is because the character has long existed in my imagination before I saw the movie? But I felt like somehow, it broke the fourth wall.

    Don’t mind Douglas in other movies that I’ve seen, but I recall wondering at the time if Fleischman was trying to promote Douglas as a beefcake. Think I would have preferred a character actor or an unknown.

    Of the Verne adaptations, I think I enjoyed Journey to the Center of the Earth (1959, which also has Mason in it) more. But I also preferred that book.

  297. It was War Gonzo whom instigated the alleged coup;)

    [MORE]

    • LOL: Ivashka the fool
  298. @Dmitry
    @Yahya


    governmental structure is more like an Oriental country than a European
     
    It's not like an oriental country. Historically it is more like a slave colony like Brazil or antebellum Southern States of the USA,

    Even today, it is not a traditional European country which develops the culture "inhouse". The culture is imported by the international elites.

    Also in Russia, the control of the power, land and resource is important, not the culture which they are often changing. It was originally importing culture from the Byzantine Empire, before Peter already they are importing the culture from Europe.

    But the European culture is often imported as a luxury product for the elite, sometimes it's followed more seriously which was in Soviet times, when because of ideological change of elite they follow the European ideas for managing the country.

    After 1991, it's returned again to importing the European culture as a luxury, not as something they follow seriously for managing the country.


    de Cuistine opine that “In Asia they love their tyrants. The more tyrannical,
     
    It's not true for Asia, unless you refer to parts of the Soviet Union like Turkmenistan. Even China since Mao, is going to collective leadership model, not the autocracy.

    Also the autocracy in the 20th century was a European model in Germany, Italy, Spain, Portugal. If you go to 19th century, it's even France for most of their century.

    While the slave colony, was model of the European countries when they are managing regions outside Europe, like America, Caribbean.

    Until 19th century Russia follows the slave colony model, where the wealthy internationalist elite have a luxury mansion with thousands of souls which cannot escape this small area of land.

    It creates a very luxury lifestyle, which is romanticized by the local versions of European literature. It's similar model to Antebellum Southern States of USA and Brazil in this epoch.

    After 1991, because of the oil and gas money is so large, there is a similar recreation of this lifestyle for people who have control of natural resources.

    This is in postsoviet system doesn't create the wealthy and money for the luxuries, from the slaves or labor. It's from ground under the people.


    Yeah well I still think it’s an entertaining country. More interesting than a well-oiled machine like Australia or Switzerland.

     

    Maybe, if you have a very long life. Political instability is inevitable and also uncommon. It's like earthquakes in Turkey. So, there are some political instability, then a few decades of stabilization where it seems very calm.

    Westerners in 1917, were probably saying "Russia is an entertaining country". Then the government mainly doesn't change across 70 years, except with some modulations around Stalin. It's one of the most stable governments in the world.

    There is instability of 1980s to 1991. But then we have same government since 1991, which is already 32 years. There is just small modifications to the government in 1995, when Yeltsin changes direction, or from 1996 the Saint-Petersburg clique (Putin, Medvedev, Sechin etc) is merging to the Yeltsin government.

    Even if there is some dramatical story like in 1999, when they were "mysterious" bombing residents' buildings in Moscow. In 1979 there was anthrax leak in Sverdlovsk. In 1957, there was nuclear disaster in Ozyorsk.

    The information will not be public unless you wait for the next government, will publicize the information. So, you might wait a few decades, before the information is open. Before then, the information is very opaque..

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    and @ Yahya

    Xi is a dictator, perhaps the most powerful one ever — with centralized control of Party, State and Army of the biggest industrial power on earth. But Japan has no history of single man dictatorships, and it is certainly an Oriental country. So “Oriental governmental structure” imply that it’s dictorial is a false premise. The longest serving Japanese PM is only Abe at less than nine years:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_prime_ministers_of_Japan#Length_of_tenure

    Historically it is more like a slave colony like Brazil or antebellum Southern States of the USA,

    No. Russia far more expansionary, so proper to be characterized as successor of the Mongols, Huns and other north Eurasian empires.

    Chinese and Japanese POV–

    https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/Жовторосія
    “Yellow Russia” colonial project to colonize Qing China north of the Great Wall
    南下政策 “Southern Expansion Policy”, to acquire ice-free ports

    Even today, it is not a traditional European country which develops the culture “inhouse”. The culture is imported by the international elites.

    You actually sound like alot of self-loathing Chinese ethnics– who says that China is a cultural 洼地 “sinkhole”. But there are geo-historical reasons for this, both northern China and Russia lie on flat terrains so prone to invasions. Prigozhin boasted about marching to Moscow in x hours, you can only do that because there’s not an Alps or English Channel in between.

    We know with Switzerland, they had the most funding per capita for science and R&D in the 20th century, so the high proportion of Nobel prizes were very predictable in this viewpoint.

    https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-219/#comment-5982926

    This is circular logic. Switzerland lies on the most rugged terrain in Europe which 1) insulating it from invasions, 2) builds a warlike character. Thus provide incubation for high-end niche industries availing scientific investments. Germany cannot become 10 Switzerlands, it doesn’t “scale”.

    • Agree: Ivashka the fool
    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms


    No. Russia far more expansionary, so proper to be characterized as successor of the Mongols, Huns and other north Eurasian empires.
     
    Yes, Persian Empires and Ottoman Empire included. Actually the concept of кормление has been directly borrowed from the Ottoman Empire during the time of Ivan the Dreadful.

    It is exactly this principle that is currently used by the Noviop "elite". It applies naturally to the vast and relatively unstructured Northern Eurasian landmass of the RF.
    , @Dmitry
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms


    “Oriental governmental structure” imply that it’s dictorial is a false premise.

     

    Yes you are repeating what I wrote.

    Russia far more expansionary,

     

    If you excluded the Soviet times, Russia is less more expansionary than USA, Brazil. Less expansionary than USA, as when Cossacks move in the border it's not ideological, but a practical need to move outside of law. The government also has expand over the border zone to secure the areas which are already settled, including from Russian rebels. It's mainly only in the Soviet times when there is really decisions to settle most of this land.

    In postsoviet time, the country is now reducing again, they allow half the country to decay and depopulate, so the model will be some megacities closer to each other in the center. A lot of the problems in Russia, are actually because it's not really expansionary and there isn't interest for investing in more than half of the country or even a lot of the sense they don't want to continue a lot of the country.

    It was only a Soviet time of seventy years when there was ideological justification to be expansionary. While USA had expansionary ideology for over two hundred years now.

    ike alot of self-loathing Chinese ethnics–
     
    Perhaps superficially, but this comment is a sign of ignorance. It's like someone says "HP imports its software". And you will write, "you sound like one of those self-hating developers at Microsoft, who says they don't develop inhouse, because the original Windows was inspired by Xerox".

    To compare to China in this topic, is one of the most bizarre comparisons. China develops culture inhouse for thousands of years. In Russia, the culture and operating systems are imported for a thousand years, if you include ancestor states of Russia.

    There is also a native Russia culture the modifications to the imported culture, however I don't anyone here understands enough about the culture, at least in relation to Europe to discuss this.

    I tried to talk about Rachmaninov to Bashibuzuk a few times, but he will just disappear if the discussion becomes a serious one, which is not something Soviet.

    geo-historical reasons for this, both northern China and Russia lie on flat terrains so prone to invasions.

     

    You couldn't compare two different countries, of China and Russia, which are more different in terms of the cultural autonomy or independence. China is an example of culture manufacturer, old center, while Russia is culture importer and slave colony model.

    China and Russia are one of the most different countries in this area. This topic has no relation to "flat terrains so prone to invasions." Russia, Brazil and USA have defeated invasions for a lot longer than inhouse culture producer countries like France or Germany.

    Prigozhin boasted about marching to Moscow in x hours, you can only do that because there’s not an Alps or English Channel in between.

     

    It seems like you are writing a muddled comment, with no relation to the topic. The reason? Because you want to talk about China and are not interested about learning about Russia.

    "Wagner" was internal conflict of elites, with a popular group, while the army is in Ukraine. It's not related to the flat terrain in Russia. The military doesn't shoot against Wagner.

    You can't invade Russia from Poland like this as there is the Russian army. Also, Russia has the world's largest number of nuclear weapons. If there is any country which you wouldn't invade. This part of the reason Putin can behave aggressively with the postsoviet border conflict in Ukraine, because he knows there is no threat of invasion from the external countries including China.

    incubation for high-end niche industries availing scientific investments. Germany cannot

     

    I'm not writing anywhere about scaling Switzerland. But the comments about scaling are about countries/territory with the English systems as a result of the information transfer in the late British empire, Bermuda, Hong Kong, Singapore, Israel, Australia, New Zealand, Australia.

    Generally, the countries with smaller populations are working better, so sure there will be at some time reduction of results with scaling.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

  299. @Ivashka the fool
    @AP

    Poor kids dying for social engineering simulacra on both sides of the front. No human life should be lost for the preservation of either RusFed or Ukrostan. Actually, even animals shouldn't be hurt to preserve these two ugly social constructs.


    “On Friday evening, June 23, in Uzhgorod, in the restaurant “Three Aces”, the head of the counterintelligence department of the SBU, Panarin Andrei, along with his subordinates, were loud during the rest. At the same time, General Mikulin was in the institution, who had a meeting with Ruman Vayel, an assistant to the people's deputy from the ruling Servant of the People party Lyudmila Marchenko, and representatives of an international European organization. Mikulin made a remark to representatives of the counterintelligence of the SBU that they were behaving loudly. Those, without understanding, began to beat Mikulin, ”says the source.

    According to him, the counterintelligence officers did not stop there.

    “Having beaten Mikulin right in the institution, a group of counterintelligence officers took Mikulin to the forest, where they beat him again, knocked out his teeth and took away his iPhone 14 mobile phone”
     
    https://t.me/a_kaminsky/7835

    If you haven't read it, I suggest you have a look at:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Kid_from_Hell

    https://www.litres.ru/book/arkadiy-i-boris-strugackie/paren-iz-preispodney-23467378/chitat-onlayn/

    Kids should read this kind of books and learning to think, instead of being brainwashed to kill and get killed.

    There is more to life than fake and corrupt mafia states.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @AP

    They did not die for Zelensky or those politicians most people haven’t heard of, but to get rid of the Russian occupiers. Same as my dad’s cousin.

  300. AP says:
    @Ivashka the fool
    @Wokechoke

    They could have grown up becoming doctors, painters, sculptors, poets, writers, scientists...

    They could have had families of their own, with healthy and happy children...

    But now they're dead.

    At least they died yelling "Glory to Ukraine" !

    Same for some young Russian Identitarians who got recently killed on the frontline. Twenty something idealistic young men, who volunteered for the active combat duty and got killed for what exactly?

    For corrupt and dysfunctional "states" such as RusFed and Ukrostan?

    I wonder if AP would agree for his sons to die in this disgusting conflict. Dying a useless death, while behind the scenes, Deep State psyop experts manipulate opinions and align social and economic outcomes on a geopolitical level.

    Just like they did yesterday.

    Replies: @AP, @Dmitry

    I wonder if AP would agree for his sons to die in this disgusting conflict

    If I was living under Russian occupation I’m not sure how I would feel about my sons choosing to bravely engage in armed resistance. I suspect I wouldn’t encourage them, and perhaps would selfishly try to convince them not to volunteer, but if they insisted on defending their homeland I wouldn’t get in their way, and I certainly would honor their heroism for the rest of my life if God forbid they fell in battle as these young heroes did.

    This and most conflicts are indeed disgusting, that doesn’t mean that the act of defending one’s homeland from the people invading it is disgusting. There’s a difference between fighting the occupiers and being one.

    On the other hand, I would oppose my sons going off to conquer Crimea or other lands that aren’t actually occupied.

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @AP

    Problem is, in their current state, either RusFed or Ukrostan are absolutely unworthy of dying for their preservation. If there was a manner through this valiant and heroic fighting and dying to reform both these ugly mutant states towards their full potential, then it would probably worth it, but there isn't.

    Yesterday, Dyumin and his Wagnerite buddies did more in 24 hours to change history than those who died at Bakhmut in all these months of fighting.

    As the saying goes: work smart, not hard.

    Replies: @AP

    , @Beckow
    @AP


    ...There’s a difference between fighting the occupiers and being one.
     
    Who is the occupier in Donbas? If the population is Russian, speaks Russian and wants friendship with Russia...are they "occupying" themselves?

    Would you want your relatives to die to make sure that those Russians are expelled, killed or forcefully assimilated? Because that is what Kiev is doing today. In territories that were for hundreds of years majority Russian and only added to Ukraine by the Bolsheviks to put some "workers" into the demographic mix.

    You are trying to find a middle ground by pretending that it is about Kiev or Lviv, but it is not - it is about whether the Russians the Donbas and the southeast have any rights, whether they can exist as themselves. I would remind you that the first law passed after Maidan in February 2014 was to abolish Russian as a regional second language - in a country where half the population are native Russian speakers. And then they murdered 50 Russians in Odessa and Kiev laughed...you still do when you lie about it.

    Replies: @QCIC, @AP

    , @Wokechoke
    @AP

    At least join organized units. Gunning down a copper is nigger behavior

    Replies: @Greasy William

  301. @silviosilver
    @Beckow

    I guess I read you too literally. You did say, "The winner gets real stuff, but is hated by the losing side who goes on and on about how the fact that they are not dead means that now they are “free”.

    The inclusion of the word "now" implies that their state of freedom is newly established, a result of the war they lost. However, all the examples you gave of the "very common pattern" are of the losing side preserving their existing state of freedom. Now, it did of course occur to me that this is what you were originally referring to, but I thought not even you would berate a losing side for fighting to preserve something of its freedom. Apparently I was wrong.

    Replies: @Beckow

    …you would berate a losing side

    I don’t berate. It is a simple observation: some things work, some don’t. Fighting losing battles doesn’t work. Some ethnics get high on tearful myths and dreams of revenge, it has its pleasures, but it is no way to run a joint – we see it in Ukraine. Everything gets destroyed, people die, families mourn, ass.oles get rich.

    At the end there is nothing, people want to forget about it. And start asking questions like what were we dying for? At that point “freedom” doesn’t do it, just an empty word for fanatics, simpletons or knaves.

    The Ukies are really dying for the ‘right’ to be in Nato. And to keep their Russian minority powerless – some even dream of eliminating the Russians completely like that autistic maniac AP. The problem is that it almost certainly won’t work and there was a compromise that Ukies rejected. To hide that reality they yell slogans about “freedom”…It makes no sense when examined, it is a cover for other things that they don’t want to say…not a good place to be when you lose.

  302. @AP
    @Ivashka the fool


    I wonder if AP would agree for his sons to die in this disgusting conflict
     
    If I was living under Russian occupation I’m not sure how I would feel about my sons choosing to bravely engage in armed resistance. I suspect I wouldn’t encourage them, and perhaps would selfishly try to convince them not to volunteer, but if they insisted on defending their homeland I wouldn’t get in their way, and I certainly would honor their heroism for the rest of my life if God forbid they fell in battle as these young heroes did.

    This and most conflicts are indeed disgusting, that doesn’t mean that the act of defending one’s homeland from the people invading it is disgusting. There’s a difference between fighting the occupiers and being one.

    On the other hand, I would oppose my sons going off to conquer Crimea or other lands that aren’t actually occupied.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Beckow, @Wokechoke

    Problem is, in their current state, either RusFed or Ukrostan are absolutely unworthy of dying for their preservation. If there was a manner through this valiant and heroic fighting and dying to reform both these ugly mutant states towards their full potential, then it would probably worth it, but there isn’t.

    Yesterday, Dyumin and his Wagnerite buddies did more in 24 hours to change history than those who died at Bakhmut in all these months of fighting.

    As the saying goes: work smart, not hard.

    • Replies: @AP
    @Ivashka the fool


    Problem is, in their current state, either RusFed or Ukrostan are absolutely unworthy of dying for their preservation
     
    Again, it’s not even really about the preservation of the state or the leaders but about fighting against foreign invaders and occupiers. That’s why those 16 year old heroes did what they did.

    If China invaded and occupied parts of Russia would you denigrate the sacrifice of those who resist by saying “RusFed is unworthy of dying for?”

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Anatoly Karlin

  303. @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms
    @Dmitry

    and @ Yahya

    Xi is a dictator, perhaps the most powerful one ever -- with centralized control of Party, State and Army of the biggest industrial power on earth. But Japan has no history of single man dictatorships, and it is certainly an Oriental country. So "Oriental governmental structure" imply that it's dictorial is a false premise. The longest serving Japanese PM is only Abe at less than nine years:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_prime_ministers_of_Japan#Length_of_tenure


    Historically it is more like a slave colony like Brazil or antebellum Southern States of the USA,
     
    No. Russia far more expansionary, so proper to be characterized as successor of the Mongols, Huns and other north Eurasian empires.

    Chinese and Japanese POV--

    https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/Жовторосія
    "Yellow Russia" colonial project to colonize Qing China north of the Great Wall
    https://i.postimg.cc/xC2fSDht/image.jpg

    南下政策 “Southern Expansion Policy”, to acquire ice-free ports
    https://i.postimg.cc/L8yRTrF6/7130c70675b265f010910a717b383e2f.jpg


    Even today, it is not a traditional European country which develops the culture “inhouse”. The culture is imported by the international elites.
     
    You actually sound like alot of self-loathing Chinese ethnics-- who says that China is a cultural 洼地 “sinkhole”. But there are geo-historical reasons for this, both northern China and Russia lie on flat terrains so prone to invasions. Prigozhin boasted about marching to Moscow in x hours, you can only do that because there's not an Alps or English Channel in between.

    We know with Switzerland, they had the most funding per capita for science and R&D in the 20th century, so the high proportion of Nobel prizes were very predictable in this viewpoint.
     
    https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-219/#comment-5982926

    This is circular logic. Switzerland lies on the most rugged terrain in Europe which 1) insulating it from invasions, 2) builds a warlike character. Thus provide incubation for high-end niche industries availing scientific investments. Germany cannot become 10 Switzerlands, it doesn't "scale".

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Dmitry

    No. Russia far more expansionary, so proper to be characterized as successor of the Mongols, Huns and other north Eurasian empires.

    Yes, Persian Empires and Ottoman Empire included. Actually the concept of кормление has been directly borrowed from the Ottoman Empire during the time of Ivan the Dreadful.

    It is exactly this principle that is currently used by the Noviop “elite”. It applies naturally to the vast and relatively unstructured Northern Eurasian landmass of the RF.

  304. @Mr. XYZ
    @Beckow


    Ok, a shrunken country, decades of rebuilding, and people leaving – and not temporarily. Yes, in a way that is what a free country looks like, I like it…:) But the question is how many people will stay to live there given the misery and discomfort, when better life is just across the border in Europe and in Russia. We will see.
     
    If Ukraine will have a long baby boom, then this could compensate for its lost people. And its lost people are likely going to be sending a lot of remittances into Ukraine anyway, which could spur a Ukrainian economic boom, especially considering that it's harder to steal remittances than to steal other kinds of money.

    Replies: @Beckow

    …If Ukraine will have a long baby boom

    If…

    it’s harder to steal remittances than to steal other kinds of money.

    I am sure the survivors will figure it out…

  305. @AP
    @Greasy William

    The idea that half of Ukraine is Russophile is false. The Russophile parts left in 2014.

    Dividing Ukraine in hand would just condemn millions of Ukrainians to Russian rule.

    This just happened in the occupied Crimean corridor. Two 16 year old kids (one, an ethnic Armenian) shot and killed a collaborator policeman and a Russian soldier, before being killed themselves. Last recorded words were Glory to Ukraine. It’s like Galicia under recent Soviet occupation (one of my father’s older cousins died while fighting Soviet soldiers in 1945, at the same age).



    https://twitter.com/gerashchenko_en/status/1672932328170045441?s=46&t=Qz3eXZWFYIvyHmaAk32tcg

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Sean, @QCIC

    The idea that half of Ukraine is Russophile is false. The Russophile parts left in 2014.

    It is very true that many Ukrainians who speak Russian are not ethnic Russians and were taught the language in school. But by the same token stopping Russian from being an officially approved language does not turn anyone into an ethnic Ukrainian.

    It’s like Galicia under recent Soviet occupation (one of my father’s older cousins died while fighting Soviet soldiers in 1945, at the same age).

    There was fighting for years after the war, and tens of thousand of deaths in the Ukraine and less bloody resistance bands lurked in the forests of Latvia for decades but it didn’t change anything. The Soviets’ did pull back from Austria though. Thereafter the Soviet’s Warsaw Pact artillery and tank steamroller did not cross the line, but it did not back off from it either, and so there was a balance of forces with Nato. When the USSR did back off because Gorby could not see what all this ironmongery was achieving, the situation became dangerously fluid for RusFed. As Sachs says in the inteview above almost the instant Ukraine became independent people like Zbigniew Brzezinski were in OP EDs in the NYT advocating to have Ukraine in Nato within ten years as the final piece in a total secure structure for the West.

    Gorby was an agricultural production expert with not understanding of international relations. Sadly illogical though it may seem to idealists, in the real world–unless you are willing to give up being a man/nation– you must give off ‘bring it on’ vibes’ or you will be tested. You can’t give ground because the other guy will push it as far as he can , which could lead to an unnecessary fight. Mearsheimer discusses how realism rules interactions in da ghetto when he discusses the article The Code Of The Streets in his book The Tragedy of Great Power Politics.

    Maybe Putin has taken Russia down a near suicidal path but he went down that path to avoid passively remaining in an inexorable ever less secure position, which ceaseless Nato maneuvering around Russia was putting it into; he doesn’t see any other way. In the West they are increasingly talking about the danger of Russia going on to invade other counties if successful in Ukraine and then maybe actual Nato member ones so it has to be stopped in Ukraine. Which may be true now, all so unnecessary and yet so inevitable.

    http://www.martin-van-creveld.com/2336-2/

    I am not aware of any great power allowing the zone between its security-border and its capital to be cut by over half without engaging in massive bloodshed. Not ancient Assyria. Not Babylon, not Persia, not Athens, Sparta and Rome. Not China. All used might and main to crush would-be separatists, sometimes with success, sometimes not. More recently, the same applied to Spain, Portugal, Britain, France, and the Netherlands. The South’s attempt to secede led to the Civil War, AKA the War of Northern Aggression, which resulted in as many dead as did all of America’s remaining ones combined. As early as 1833, with a population of only 13,000,000 (including 2,000,000 slaves) the U.S had the unheard-of effrontery of claiming the entire Western hemisphere as its exclusive stamping ground.

    I know: It is mostly power and interest, not justice and morality, which govern relations between nations and states. So it has always been, and so it will always remain. But I think that what we can do, and what I myself have been trying to do in this essay, is get rid of some of the ira et studio. Both of the lies and the idea that one side is completely right and the other, completely wrong. Whatever else, doing so may make reaching some kind of agreement that much easier.

    The alternative is the ostensibly bring it on behavior done from defensive motives continues and action from one of of the parties elicits symmetrical response behaviors from the other party until there is direct hostilities, which neither are willing to lose. And that is international relations as a suicide pact.

    • Agree: Ivashka the fool
  306. @AP
    @Ivashka the fool


    I wonder if AP would agree for his sons to die in this disgusting conflict
     
    If I was living under Russian occupation I’m not sure how I would feel about my sons choosing to bravely engage in armed resistance. I suspect I wouldn’t encourage them, and perhaps would selfishly try to convince them not to volunteer, but if they insisted on defending their homeland I wouldn’t get in their way, and I certainly would honor their heroism for the rest of my life if God forbid they fell in battle as these young heroes did.

    This and most conflicts are indeed disgusting, that doesn’t mean that the act of defending one’s homeland from the people invading it is disgusting. There’s a difference between fighting the occupiers and being one.

    On the other hand, I would oppose my sons going off to conquer Crimea or other lands that aren’t actually occupied.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Beckow, @Wokechoke

    …There’s a difference between fighting the occupiers and being one.

    Who is the occupier in Donbas? If the population is Russian, speaks Russian and wants friendship with Russia…are they “occupying” themselves?

    Would you want your relatives to die to make sure that those Russians are expelled, killed or forcefully assimilated? Because that is what Kiev is doing today. In territories that were for hundreds of years majority Russian and only added to Ukraine by the Bolsheviks to put some “workers” into the demographic mix.

    You are trying to find a middle ground by pretending that it is about Kiev or Lviv, but it is not – it is about whether the Russians the Donbas and the southeast have any rights, whether they can exist as themselves. I would remind you that the first law passed after Maidan in February 2014 was to abolish Russian as a regional second language – in a country where half the population are native Russian speakers. And then they murdered 50 Russians in Odessa and Kiev laughed…you still do when you lie about it.

    • Replies: @QCIC
    @Beckow

    After the fall of the Soviet Union, the Ukrainian Nationalists were gifted a country they never could have created by force. I wonder if they felt the need to prove themselves by conquering the South Eastern areas? They should have left well enough alone.

    Replies: @Another Polish Perspective

    , @AP
    @Beckow


    “There’s a difference between fighting the occupiers and being one.”

    Who is the occupier in Donbas? If the population is Russian, speaks Russian and wants friendship with Russia…are they “occupying” themselves?
     
    As I said, I oppose invading and occupying places such as Crimea or Donetsk city.

    Zaporizhia is not those areas.

    Would you want your relatives to die to make sure that those Russians are expelled, killed or forcefully assimilated? Because that is what Kiev is doing today
     
    Kiev is fighting Russian invaders. Those 16 year old boys did not fight to conquer Crimea but died in battle against occupiers of their home.

    In territories that were for hundreds of years majority Russian
     
    Now you are just back to your usual lying. Crimea was not majority Russian until 1945.

    I would remind you that the first law passed after Maidan in February 2014 was to abolish Russian as a regional second language – in a country where half the population are native Russian speakers
     
    And a large percentage of those Russian speakers, and majority of Ukraine’s population, supported that. It was repealing a law passed by a fake parliament and unpopular president in 2011. Repealing it returned Ukraine to the status quo of 1991-2011.

    And then they murdered 50 Russians in Odessa
     
    Repeating your lie again, of course.

    Replies: @Beckow

  307. @AP
    @Greasy William

    The idea that half of Ukraine is Russophile is false. The Russophile parts left in 2014.

    Dividing Ukraine in hand would just condemn millions of Ukrainians to Russian rule.

    This just happened in the occupied Crimean corridor. Two 16 year old kids (one, an ethnic Armenian) shot and killed a collaborator policeman and a Russian soldier, before being killed themselves. Last recorded words were Glory to Ukraine. It’s like Galicia under recent Soviet occupation (one of my father’s older cousins died while fighting Soviet soldiers in 1945, at the same age).



    https://twitter.com/gerashchenko_en/status/1672932328170045441?s=46&t=Qz3eXZWFYIvyHmaAk32tcg

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Sean, @QCIC

    The Western narrative on Ukraine sometimes treats it as a country along the lines of Poland which has a long, stand-alone history and a vastly different culture from Russia. In this narrative Russia simply attacked one day. Here at Unz it has been conclusively shown that neither of these points is accurate.

    The separation from Russia and recognition dreamed of by Ukrainian Nationalists might have happened organically given enough time. Unfortunately, outside forces arrayed against Russia offered these Nationalists a Faustian margin. The West dazzled them into believing they could have this recognition and independence immediately during their lifetimes. The bargain required them to attack their Slavic brethren in exchange for recognition. Sadly, by attacking their brethren on behalf of the West, they undermined much of their rationale for independence.

    All is not lost. At the moment, I don’t think Russia really wants anything West of the river. Ukrainians may be able to salvage some of the dream if they focus on this land. To make it work they probably need to fully purge the NeoNAZI elements. Unfortunately, some Ukrainians may have difficulty releasing this warrior ideology.

  308. @Wokechoke
    @Wokechoke

    it's a funny book. I was mainly interested in it because Celine turned out to be a Modernist and Fascist. Also George MacDonald Frasers Flashman bears some resemblance to Bardamu.

    Replies: @Coconuts

    Not sure if Celine’s writings about the Jewish issue have been translated into English, I heard they are not often reprinted in French. He was unusually single minded and uninhibited about this issue, like it was the only one that mattered in politics.

    Iirc Lucien Rabatet is the other main French Fascist author who shared Celine’s pov.

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @Coconuts

    (Trifles for a Massacre, 1937):

    Their nose, the “toucan” beak of the swindler, the traitor, the felon…the sordid schemes, the betrayals, a nose that points to, lowers toward, and falls over their mouths, their hideous slots, that rotten banana, their croissant, their filthy kike grins, boorish, slimy, even in beauty pageants, the very outline of a sucking snout: the Vampire…. It’s pure zoology!… Elementary!… It’s your blood these ghouls are after!



    It’s good stuff.

    Replies: @Greasy William

  309. @AP
    @Ivashka the fool


    I wonder if AP would agree for his sons to die in this disgusting conflict
     
    If I was living under Russian occupation I’m not sure how I would feel about my sons choosing to bravely engage in armed resistance. I suspect I wouldn’t encourage them, and perhaps would selfishly try to convince them not to volunteer, but if they insisted on defending their homeland I wouldn’t get in their way, and I certainly would honor their heroism for the rest of my life if God forbid they fell in battle as these young heroes did.

    This and most conflicts are indeed disgusting, that doesn’t mean that the act of defending one’s homeland from the people invading it is disgusting. There’s a difference between fighting the occupiers and being one.

    On the other hand, I would oppose my sons going off to conquer Crimea or other lands that aren’t actually occupied.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Beckow, @Wokechoke

    At least join organized units. Gunning down a copper is nigger behavior

    • Replies: @Greasy William
    @Wokechoke

    After their behavior during Covid, all cops should be dead

  310. @Coconuts
    @Wokechoke

    Not sure if Celine's writings about the Jewish issue have been translated into English, I heard they are not often reprinted in French. He was unusually single minded and uninhibited about this issue, like it was the only one that mattered in politics.

    Iirc Lucien Rabatet is the other main French Fascist author who shared Celine's pov.

    Replies: @Wokechoke

    (Trifles for a Massacre, 1937):

    Their nose, the “toucan” beak of the swindler, the traitor, the felon…the sordid schemes, the betrayals, a nose that points to, lowers toward, and falls over their mouths, their hideous slots, that rotten banana, their croissant, their filthy kike grins, boorish, slimy, even in beauty pageants, the very outline of a sucking snout: the Vampire…. It’s pure zoology!… Elementary!… It’s your blood these ghouls are after!

    It’s good stuff.

    • Replies: @Greasy William
    @Wokechoke

    he was a wackadoodle who wrote about hate fucking Jewish girls in his later years. I don't think you want to be holding him up as some brilliant counter Jew expert. He was just another French nut who was reviled by practically everyone he knew

    Replies: @Wokechoke

  311. @songbird
    @Mr. XYZ

    15 image posts without a "more" tag is a little much. Probably does not lend to stable threads going to 1000+.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    Thanks! I’ll try to remember to follow your advice from now on!

    • Thanks: songbird
  312. @Beckow
    @AP


    ...There’s a difference between fighting the occupiers and being one.
     
    Who is the occupier in Donbas? If the population is Russian, speaks Russian and wants friendship with Russia...are they "occupying" themselves?

    Would you want your relatives to die to make sure that those Russians are expelled, killed or forcefully assimilated? Because that is what Kiev is doing today. In territories that were for hundreds of years majority Russian and only added to Ukraine by the Bolsheviks to put some "workers" into the demographic mix.

    You are trying to find a middle ground by pretending that it is about Kiev or Lviv, but it is not - it is about whether the Russians the Donbas and the southeast have any rights, whether they can exist as themselves. I would remind you that the first law passed after Maidan in February 2014 was to abolish Russian as a regional second language - in a country where half the population are native Russian speakers. And then they murdered 50 Russians in Odessa and Kiev laughed...you still do when you lie about it.

    Replies: @QCIC, @AP

    After the fall of the Soviet Union, the Ukrainian Nationalists were gifted a country they never could have created by force. I wonder if they felt the need to prove themselves by conquering the South Eastern areas? They should have left well enough alone.

    • Replies: @Another Polish Perspective
    @QCIC


    After the fall of the Soviet Union, the Ukrainian Nationalists were gifted a country they never could have created by force.
     
    That' s actually right. Ukrainian state eastern borders aren't actually the outcome of natural historical processes.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

  313. @S
    @Wokechoke

    At first I thought this de Lacey was a descendant of Anthony de Lucy (aka St Bees Man) whom had also fought in the Baltics, albeit in the 14th century.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/St_Bees_Man

    Apparently not, though maybe far back in Normandy prior to the Millennium the de Laceys and the de Lucys may have shared a common surname.

    Replies: @Wokechoke

    There’s a Baron De Lacy in northern England.

  314. @QCIC
    @Beckow

    After the fall of the Soviet Union, the Ukrainian Nationalists were gifted a country they never could have created by force. I wonder if they felt the need to prove themselves by conquering the South Eastern areas? They should have left well enough alone.

    Replies: @Another Polish Perspective

    After the fall of the Soviet Union, the Ukrainian Nationalists were gifted a country they never could have created by force.

    That’ s actually right. Ukrainian state eastern borders aren’t actually the outcome of natural historical processes.

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @Another Polish Perspective

    Same as its western borders.


    The Polish plural term Kresy corresponds to the Russian okrainy (окраины), meaning "the border regions".[2] It is also largely co-terminous with the northern areas of the Pale of Settlement, a scheme devised by Catherine the Great to limit Jews from settling in the homogenously Christian Orthodox core of the Russian Empire, such as Moscow and Saint Petersburg. The Pale was established after the Second Partition of Poland and lasted until the 1917 revolution, when the Russian Empire ceased to exist.
     
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kresy

    Kresy - borderlands - okrayny - ukraina, it is not a coincidence. A borderland between Polish and Russian cultural influences, resulting in an original mixed identity, evolving under a strong Jewish influence.

    Replies: @Another Polish Perspective

  315. @Wokechoke
    @AP

    At least join organized units. Gunning down a copper is nigger behavior

    Replies: @Greasy William

    After their behavior during Covid, all cops should be dead

  316. @Another Polish Perspective
    @QCIC


    After the fall of the Soviet Union, the Ukrainian Nationalists were gifted a country they never could have created by force.
     
    That' s actually right. Ukrainian state eastern borders aren't actually the outcome of natural historical processes.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

    Same as its western borders.

    The Polish plural term Kresy corresponds to the Russian okrainy (окраины), meaning “the border regions”.[2] It is also largely co-terminous with the northern areas of the Pale of Settlement, a scheme devised by Catherine the Great to limit Jews from settling in the homogenously Christian Orthodox core of the Russian Empire, such as Moscow and Saint Petersburg. The Pale was established after the Second Partition of Poland and lasted until the 1917 revolution, when the Russian Empire ceased to exist.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kresy

    Kresy – borderlands – okrayny – ukraina, it is not a coincidence. A borderland between Polish and Russian cultural influences, resulting in an original mixed identity, evolving under a strong Jewish influence.

    • Replies: @Another Polish Perspective
    @Ivashka the fool

    I meant that if Ukrainian borders were to be established according to rules applied after WWI - to areas with undisputed Ukrainian national majority, the current eastern territory of Ukraine would probably not qualify (well, they could make a plebiscite to try). The situation is not the same in the case of Western Ukraine.

    Is is actually interesting that after the fall of Austria-Hungary, the resulting states often changed borders, but after the fall of Soviet Union, its republics simply became states.

    Replies: @Beckow

  317. @Ivashka the fool
    @Another Polish Perspective

    Same as its western borders.


    The Polish plural term Kresy corresponds to the Russian okrainy (окраины), meaning "the border regions".[2] It is also largely co-terminous with the northern areas of the Pale of Settlement, a scheme devised by Catherine the Great to limit Jews from settling in the homogenously Christian Orthodox core of the Russian Empire, such as Moscow and Saint Petersburg. The Pale was established after the Second Partition of Poland and lasted until the 1917 revolution, when the Russian Empire ceased to exist.
     
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kresy

    Kresy - borderlands - okrayny - ukraina, it is not a coincidence. A borderland between Polish and Russian cultural influences, resulting in an original mixed identity, evolving under a strong Jewish influence.

    Replies: @Another Polish Perspective

    I meant that if Ukrainian borders were to be established according to rules applied after WWI – to areas with undisputed Ukrainian national majority, the current eastern territory of Ukraine would probably not qualify (well, they could make a plebiscite to try). The situation is not the same in the case of Western Ukraine.

    Is is actually interesting that after the fall of Austria-Hungary, the resulting states often changed borders, but after the fall of Soviet Union, its republics simply became states.

    • Replies: @Beckow
    @Another Polish Perspective


    ...after the fall of Austria-Hungary, the resulting states often changed borders, but after the fall of Soviet Union, its republics simply became states.
     
    The borders of the successor state of the Habsburg Empire also largely followed the admin borders within A-H. The Sudetenland dispute resulted from this. There were referendums in some border areas, e.g. Burgenland was detached from Hungary and given to Austria after a plebiscite. Hungary was an exception and new borders were drawn based on the 1910 census (favoring the winning side).

    The two principles: existing borders-administrative lines vs. ethnic self-determination are in an obvious conflict in many places. After WW1 it was handled more rationally, but there were still issues later on.

    The current Western policies are incoherent. The West insists on some borders being sacrosanct and some ethnics deserving self-determination, but others don't. It is purely based on Washington-EU geopolitical preferences. That leads to absurd situations like Nato starting a war to separate the Kosovo region from Serbia, but now insisting that Ukraine borders are sacred.

    Hypocrisy that big is not sustainable. That's why we get the hapless moron propagandists demanding that discussion must be controlled - some topics are off limits. That is also not sustainable, these are sad times for the West - they have been hoisted on a canard of their own making. And they keep on making more canards...so we get desperation, clowns, constant lying, it is quite entertaining...:)

  318. @Wokechoke
    @Coconuts

    (Trifles for a Massacre, 1937):

    Their nose, the “toucan” beak of the swindler, the traitor, the felon…the sordid schemes, the betrayals, a nose that points to, lowers toward, and falls over their mouths, their hideous slots, that rotten banana, their croissant, their filthy kike grins, boorish, slimy, even in beauty pageants, the very outline of a sucking snout: the Vampire…. It’s pure zoology!… Elementary!… It’s your blood these ghouls are after!



    It’s good stuff.

    Replies: @Greasy William

    he was a wackadoodle who wrote about hate fucking Jewish girls in his later years. I don’t think you want to be holding him up as some brilliant counter Jew expert. He was just another French nut who was reviled by practically everyone he knew

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @Greasy William

    Holding up?

    Well, anyone who wants to can read knock off translations of Trifles For a Massacre.

    It’s funny stuff. Most of it true. There’s several mentions of how so few Jews with French passports died in 14-18…and the why.

    France lost 1.2 million dead and around 1000 Jews died defending La Patrie.

  319. The current age of Putin, 70, strangely coincides with the Daniel’s 70 weeks prophecy, which also speaks about flood….
    Did Chabad-Lubavitch decide to get rid of their anointed king…?

    “After the sixty-two weeks, an anointed one shall be cut off and shall have nothing, and the troops of the prince who is to come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary. Its end shall come with a flood, and to the end there shall be war. Desolations are decreed.”

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prophecy_of_Seventy_Weeks

    We will see in October 2023… strangely there is around 3,5 months to Putin birthday, which is another number mentioned in this prophecy (half of the week)…

    “He shall make a strong covenant with many for one week, and for half of the week he shall make sacrifice and offering cease; and in their place shall be an abomination that desolates, until the decreed end is poured out upon the desolator.”
    Daniel 9:27

    Unless of course they decided to get rid of him just now …. all these talks about Putin’s doubles must have come from somewhere…

    • Replies: @Greasy William
    @Another Polish Perspective

    The 2nd vid below discusses all this.

    Tl;dw: Iran and Russia are watched over the same archangel, nicknamed "The Bear". While Iranians have traditionally regarded their symbol as the tiger, Jews have always associated Iran with the bear.

    Iran is the only state in the Russian version of NATO that was not also in the Warsaw pact

    Putin was born on Sukkot, the Messiah is expected to arrive on Sukkot

    Russia will nuke Israel (as the Iranians are far too primitive and stupid to ever successfully develop the 1940's technology required to build nuclear weapons, Magog will have to bail out his retarded younger brother)

    Then the Messiah will come

    The Messiah is to arrive in either 2027 or 2030. See first vid below
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vz5fC872Oek&t


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZvHpZLbsHZY

    Replies: @Another Polish Perspective, @A123, @Ivashka the fool

  320. S says:

    Whatever Prigozhin does, or doesn’t do, during the next few days, weeks, and months, may well tell us a lot about the exact nature of the events of yesterday.

    Should he unexpectedly die (or ‘suicide’) through a wide variety of means, or, simply ‘clam up’, and not speak publicly ever again on anything of substance, that will likely have meant that ‘they got to him’ in some fashion.

    In that case, the would be coup, a psyop perhaps, will have figuratively ‘killed two birds with one stone’, ie gotten rid of Prigozhin who had become more trouble than he was worth, and allowed for restructuring in Russia’s armed forces, particularly in regards to command. Putin will have been provided the opportunity to show off his competent leadership skills in facing down a threat.

    However, if after retiring for a short time, and even though in ‘exile’ (in not very far away Belarus), Prigozhin soon returns to his outspoken political habits and ways, the would be coup/psyop may have had another primary purpose altogether.

    Everyone knows about Prigozhin’s ability to bring about mass death and destruction, in particular towards Russians and Ukrainians. He himself has made sure people are aware of this aspect of his legend.

    The would be coup/psyop allows for Prigozhin to show another side of his legend to the Russisn people, to round it out as it were, ie that of his being the giver and preserver of life.

    Prighozin, in the midst of the would be coup, appeared to be only a step or two away from taking power. To achieve power, however, would have required the death of many Russians, and likely the death of Putin. Prigozhin, however, publicly and explicitly stood down to preserve life. He (refreshingly) gave life in this instance instead of his (usual) taking of it.

    The power dynamic between Prigozhin and Putin in this would be coup/psyop, is not dissimilar in certain ways to that in the clip below between the underdog gladiator Maximus and the Roman emperor Commodus.

    The gladiator, by showing unexpected mercy, by giving life, in contrast to taking it as the Emperor advocated, showed himself to be the better man of the two.

    Similarly, Prigozhin, by showing unexpected mercy in contrast to Putin’s threats, showed himself (at least figuratively) to have been the better man.

    Should Prigozhin bloodlessly achieve power for himself in the Rusfed, replacing Putin in the process, the psyop of yesterday may ultimately prove to have been the critical factor.

    ‘Prigozhin the Merciful’

    • Replies: @Beckow
    @S


    ...Prighozin, in the midst of the would be coup, appeared to be only a step or two away from taking power.
     
    Are you serious? He was about trillion miles away from taking power - it was a charade. In a country of 150 million with security forces numbering in millions, a group of a few thousand mercenaries was going to take power? How?

    Prigozhin is the new Tichanovskaia...Guidados in the Western feverish imagination are multiplying. It is not a good omen - they are losing their grip on reality.

    It is ok, we see that at this point the elites are just f..ing with their own hapless people - total disrespect and total disinterest, they don't even try to explain themselves. We are back to some weird power dynamics...

    Replies: @S

    , @Emil Nikola Richard
    @S

    Intuitions have great attraction. They are mostly completely wrong.

  321. @Another Polish Perspective
    @Ivashka the fool

    I meant that if Ukrainian borders were to be established according to rules applied after WWI - to areas with undisputed Ukrainian national majority, the current eastern territory of Ukraine would probably not qualify (well, they could make a plebiscite to try). The situation is not the same in the case of Western Ukraine.

    Is is actually interesting that after the fall of Austria-Hungary, the resulting states often changed borders, but after the fall of Soviet Union, its republics simply became states.

    Replies: @Beckow

    …after the fall of Austria-Hungary, the resulting states often changed borders, but after the fall of Soviet Union, its republics simply became states.

    The borders of the successor state of the Habsburg Empire also largely followed the admin borders within A-H. The Sudetenland dispute resulted from this. There were referendums in some border areas, e.g. Burgenland was detached from Hungary and given to Austria after a plebiscite. Hungary was an exception and new borders were drawn based on the 1910 census (favoring the winning side).

    The two principles: existing borders-administrative lines vs. ethnic self-determination are in an obvious conflict in many places. After WW1 it was handled more rationally, but there were still issues later on.

    The current Western policies are incoherent. The West insists on some borders being sacrosanct and some ethnics deserving self-determination, but others don’t. It is purely based on Washington-EU geopolitical preferences. That leads to absurd situations like Nato starting a war to separate the Kosovo region from Serbia, but now insisting that Ukraine borders are sacred.

    Hypocrisy that big is not sustainable. That’s why we get the hapless moron propagandists demanding that discussion must be controlled – some topics are off limits. That is also not sustainable, these are sad times for the West – they have been hoisted on a canard of their own making. And they keep on making more canards…so we get desperation, clowns, constant lying, it is quite entertaining…:)

  322. @S
    Whatever Prigozhin does, or doesn't do, during the next few days, weeks, and months, may well tell us a lot about the exact nature of the events of yesterday.

    Should he unexpectedly die (or 'suicide') through a wide variety of means, or, simply 'clam up', and not speak publicly ever again on anything of substance, that will likely have meant that 'they got to him' in some fashion.

    In that case, the would be coup, a psyop perhaps, will have figuratively 'killed two birds with one stone', ie gotten rid of Prigozhin who had become more trouble than he was worth, and allowed for restructuring in Russia's armed forces, particularly in regards to command. Putin will have been provided the opportunity to show off his competent leadership skills in facing down a threat.

    However, if after retiring for a short time, and even though in 'exile' (in not very far away Belarus), Prigozhin soon returns to his outspoken political habits and ways, the would be coup/psyop may have had another primary purpose altogether.

    Everyone knows about Prigozhin's ability to bring about mass death and destruction, in particular towards Russians and Ukrainians. He himself has made sure people are aware of this aspect of his legend.

    The would be coup/psyop allows for Prigozhin to show another side of his legend to the Russisn people, to round it out as it were, ie that of his being the giver and preserver of life.

    Prighozin, in the midst of the would be coup, appeared to be only a step or two away from taking power. To achieve power, however, would have required the death of many Russians, and likely the death of Putin. Prigozhin, however, publicly and explicitly stood down to preserve life. He (refreshingly) gave life in this instance instead of his (usual) taking of it.

    The power dynamic between Prigozhin and Putin in this would be coup/psyop, is not dissimilar in certain ways to that in the clip below between the underdog gladiator Maximus and the Roman emperor Commodus.

    The gladiator, by showing unexpected mercy, by giving life, in contrast to taking it as the Emperor advocated, showed himself to be the better man of the two.

    Similarly, Prigozhin, by showing unexpected mercy in contrast to Putin's threats, showed himself (at least figuratively) to have been the better man.

    Should Prigozhin bloodlessly achieve power for himself in the Rusfed, replacing Putin in the process, the psyop of yesterday may ultimately prove to have been the critical factor.

    'Prigozhin the Merciful'

    https://youtu.be/vnZzqbraQFo

    Replies: @Beckow, @Emil Nikola Richard

    …Prighozin, in the midst of the would be coup, appeared to be only a step or two away from taking power.

    Are you serious? He was about trillion miles away from taking power – it was a charade. In a country of 150 million with security forces numbering in millions, a group of a few thousand mercenaries was going to take power? How?

    Prigozhin is the new Tichanovskaia…Guidados in the Western feverish imagination are multiplying. It is not a good omen – they are losing their grip on reality.

    It is ok, we see that at this point the elites are just f..ing with their own hapless people – total disrespect and total disinterest, they don’t even try to explain themselves. We are back to some weird power dynamics…

    • Agree: LondonBob
    • Replies: @S
    @Beckow


    Are you serious?
     
    Quite.

    In a country of 150 million with security forces numbering in millions, a group of a few thousand mercenaries was going to take power?
     
    History is full of such examples. Surely you know that.

    How.
     
    The barrel of a gun.

    He was about trillion miles away from taking power – it was a charade.
     
    More seriously...

    I myself agree that it was probably a psyop, or, a 'charade' if you will. What you don't like is my interpretation of this 'charade', or, 'psyop'...ie the real possibility this was in reality about grooming Prigozhin to take power in Russia.

    Mind you, I've made it plain I am okay with republics, and am not for N S ideology, nor am I for what the US and UK is doing. I think the US/UK elites and hangers on should have been overthrown long ago.

    It's very plain to myself (and I am sure many others) that the US/UK is attempting to do to Russia exactly what was done to Germany in WWII, ie utterly destroy it. I lean towards Guido Preparata's hypothesis in Conjuring Hitler that the US/UK groomed Hitler to take power in Germany. I think it very possible in Prigozhin they have found their 'literally another Hitler', or, more likely, 'worse than Hitler', person they wish to take power in Russia.

    They want the most militant and radical manifestation of Russian identity expressed to 1) ensure WWIII take place, and 2) is as destructive as possible to the identity of the Russian people, and that of others, as possible, the same as was done to the Germans and their identity in WWII with Hitler and National Socialism.

    The proof is in the pudding, in this instance it's what Prigozhin chooses to say and do during the next few days, weeks, and months.

    And as is so often the case, I'd rather others (including you) be correct, instead of me.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Greasy William, @Beckow

  323. @Another Polish Perspective
    The current age of Putin, 70, strangely coincides with the Daniel's 70 weeks prophecy, which also speaks about flood....
    Did Chabad-Lubavitch decide to get rid of their anointed king...?

    "After the sixty-two weeks, an anointed one shall be cut off and shall have nothing, and the troops of the prince who is to come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary. Its end shall come with a flood, and to the end there shall be war. Desolations are decreed."

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prophecy_of_Seventy_Weeks

    We will see in October 2023... strangely there is around 3,5 months to Putin birthday, which is another number mentioned in this prophecy (half of the week)...

    "He shall make a strong covenant with many for one week, and for half of the week he shall make sacrifice and offering cease; and in their place shall be an abomination that desolates, until the decreed end is poured out upon the desolator."
    Daniel 9:27

    Unless of course they decided to get rid of him just now .... all these talks about Putin's doubles must have come from somewhere...

    Replies: @Greasy William

    The 2nd vid below discusses all this.

    Tl;dw: Iran and Russia are watched over the same archangel, nicknamed “The Bear”. While Iranians have traditionally regarded their symbol as the tiger, Jews have always associated Iran with the bear.

    Iran is the only state in the Russian version of NATO that was not also in the Warsaw pact

    Putin was born on Sukkot, the Messiah is expected to arrive on Sukkot

    Russia will nuke Israel (as the Iranians are far too primitive and stupid to ever successfully develop the 1940’s technology required to build nuclear weapons, Magog will have to bail out his retarded younger brother)

    Then the Messiah will come

    The Messiah is to arrive in either 2027 or 2030. See first vid below

    • Replies: @Another Polish Perspective
    @Greasy William

    Oh, the Gog-Magog war was WWII 1941-45, with Gog being Germans, and Magog Russians. As far as Ukrainians are "Waregs" they could be said to be "Gog" too.... interestingly, that would also explain their significant willingness to collaborate with Germany during WWII. On the other hand, Gog was to be accompanied by multitude of allies according to the Book of Ezekiel if I remember well, so maybe Ukrainians are not Gogites after all, and just another ally aside Norwegian, Dutch, Spanish, Hungarian etc formations.

    Messiah is the king of peace and this is the reason why SMO is actually SMO - because SMO is not "war".

    But of course, trying to preserve the truth of prophecy is sometimes hard - as when labelling a war "special military operation".

    Still, people almost never realize when prophecies come true. But, yes, not all prophecies come true - but here we are discussing the very serious Biblical prophecy.
    TPTB are of course interested in muddling the picture - they simultaneously adjust to [some] prophecies and spread lies about it. You know, everything is about timing...

    Replies: @Greasy William

    , @A123
    @Greasy William


    Iranians have traditionally regarded their symbol as the tiger,
     
    I thought that Iran used a lion & sun (not a tiger).

     
    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b6/Imperial_Emblem_of_the_Qajar_Dynasty_(Lion_and_Sun).svg/170px-Imperial_Emblem_of_the_Qajar_Dynasty_(Lion_and_Sun).svg.png
     


    Russia will nuke Israel
     
    Why would Putin bomb his ally (possibly friend) Netanyahu?

     
    https://d.newsweek.com/en/full/451308/netanyahu-putin.jpg
     

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @Greasy William

    , @Ivashka the fool
    @Greasy William

    The prophecies made by the Demiurge are always lies and manipulations. He has been named Saklas (the Blind, as in the Blind Watchmaker) for a reason. His insight is limited, although it is of course stronger than the insight of common mortals. But Buddhas and Bodhisattvas do not lie and are a valid source of knowledge. We therefore know that your Messiah will not come, not in the coming years, not ever. Get used to this thought.

  324. @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms
    @Dmitry

    and @ Yahya

    Xi is a dictator, perhaps the most powerful one ever -- with centralized control of Party, State and Army of the biggest industrial power on earth. But Japan has no history of single man dictatorships, and it is certainly an Oriental country. So "Oriental governmental structure" imply that it's dictorial is a false premise. The longest serving Japanese PM is only Abe at less than nine years:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_prime_ministers_of_Japan#Length_of_tenure


    Historically it is more like a slave colony like Brazil or antebellum Southern States of the USA,
     
    No. Russia far more expansionary, so proper to be characterized as successor of the Mongols, Huns and other north Eurasian empires.

    Chinese and Japanese POV--

    https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/Жовторосія
    "Yellow Russia" colonial project to colonize Qing China north of the Great Wall
    https://i.postimg.cc/xC2fSDht/image.jpg

    南下政策 “Southern Expansion Policy”, to acquire ice-free ports
    https://i.postimg.cc/L8yRTrF6/7130c70675b265f010910a717b383e2f.jpg


    Even today, it is not a traditional European country which develops the culture “inhouse”. The culture is imported by the international elites.
     
    You actually sound like alot of self-loathing Chinese ethnics-- who says that China is a cultural 洼地 “sinkhole”. But there are geo-historical reasons for this, both northern China and Russia lie on flat terrains so prone to invasions. Prigozhin boasted about marching to Moscow in x hours, you can only do that because there's not an Alps or English Channel in between.

    We know with Switzerland, they had the most funding per capita for science and R&D in the 20th century, so the high proportion of Nobel prizes were very predictable in this viewpoint.
     
    https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-219/#comment-5982926

    This is circular logic. Switzerland lies on the most rugged terrain in Europe which 1) insulating it from invasions, 2) builds a warlike character. Thus provide incubation for high-end niche industries availing scientific investments. Germany cannot become 10 Switzerlands, it doesn't "scale".

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Dmitry

    “Oriental governmental structure” imply that it’s dictorial is a false premise.

    Yes you are repeating what I wrote.

    Russia far more expansionary,

    If you excluded the Soviet times, Russia is less more expansionary than USA, Brazil. Less expansionary than USA, as when Cossacks move in the border it’s not ideological, but a practical need to move outside of law. The government also has expand over the border zone to secure the areas which are already settled, including from Russian rebels. It’s mainly only in the Soviet times when there is really decisions to settle most of this land.

    In postsoviet time, the country is now reducing again, they allow half the country to decay and depopulate, so the model will be some megacities closer to each other in the center. A lot of the problems in Russia, are actually because it’s not really expansionary and there isn’t interest for investing in more than half of the country or even a lot of the sense they don’t want to continue a lot of the country.

    It was only a Soviet time of seventy years when there was ideological justification to be expansionary. While USA had expansionary ideology for over two hundred years now.

    ike alot of self-loathing Chinese ethnics–

    Perhaps superficially, but this comment is a sign of ignorance. It’s like someone says “HP imports its software”. And you will write, “you sound like one of those self-hating developers at Microsoft, who says they don’t develop inhouse, because the original Windows was inspired by Xerox”.

    To compare to China in this topic, is one of the most bizarre comparisons. China develops culture inhouse for thousands of years. In Russia, the culture and operating systems are imported for a thousand years, if you include ancestor states of Russia.

    There is also a native Russia culture the modifications to the imported culture, however I don’t anyone here understands enough about the culture, at least in relation to Europe to discuss this.

    I tried to talk about Rachmaninov to Bashibuzuk a few times, but he will just disappear if the discussion becomes a serious one, which is not something Soviet.

    geo-historical reasons for this, both northern China and Russia lie on flat terrains so prone to invasions.

    You couldn’t compare two different countries, of China and Russia, which are more different in terms of the cultural autonomy or independence. China is an example of culture manufacturer, old center, while Russia is culture importer and slave colony model.

    China and Russia are one of the most different countries in this area. This topic has no relation to “flat terrains so prone to invasions.” Russia, Brazil and USA have defeated invasions for a lot longer than inhouse culture producer countries like France or Germany.

    Prigozhin boasted about marching to Moscow in x hours, you can only do that because there’s not an Alps or English Channel in between.

    It seems like you are writing a muddled comment, with no relation to the topic. The reason? Because you want to talk about China and are not interested about learning about Russia.

    “Wagner” was internal conflict of elites, with a popular group, while the army is in Ukraine. It’s not related to the flat terrain in Russia. The military doesn’t shoot against Wagner.

    You can’t invade Russia from Poland like this as there is the Russian army. Also, Russia has the world’s largest number of nuclear weapons. If there is any country which you wouldn’t invade. This part of the reason Putin can behave aggressively with the postsoviet border conflict in Ukraine, because he knows there is no threat of invasion from the external countries including China.

    incubation for high-end niche industries availing scientific investments. Germany cannot

    I’m not writing anywhere about scaling Switzerland. But the comments about scaling are about countries/territory with the English systems as a result of the information transfer in the late British empire, Bermuda, Hong Kong, Singapore, Israel, Australia, New Zealand, Australia.

    Generally, the countries with smaller populations are working better, so sure there will be at some time reduction of results with scaling.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @Dmitry


    While USA had expansionary ideology for over two hundred years now.
     
    The US's territorial expansions have largely ended over a century ago:

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/94/U.S._Territorial_Acquisitions.png

    The last territorial acquisition on this map that I see is the Danish West Indies, acquired in 1917, 106 years ago. We would have acquired them even sooner, specifically back in 1902, had this sale gotten just one more vote in the upper house (Landsting/Landsthing) of the Danish parliament (Riksdag) back then.
    , @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms
    @Dmitry


    Because you want to talk about China and are not interested about learning about Russia.
     
    I’m not the one shitting on Russian culture, you are. I’m pointing out the obvious commonalities in Russian and Chinese history. Deng Xiaoping didn't come up with "One Country, Two Systems", the source of ethnonym you have for us, Khitans did, with a dual system of nomadic organization north of Great Wall, scholar-official bureacracy south of it, made a more "scalable" solution inherited by PRC.

    Similar to Mongol conquest of Russia that has made it into a more scalable multi-ethnic empire. Thus some historians call Batu first tsar of Russia--

    Батый — первый царь России
    https://diletant.media/articles/45302248/

    Russian Tsar Batu | Penzev Konstantin Alexandrovich

    According to the author, there was an unspoken agreement between Khan Baty, Russian princes and the Russian Orthodox Church on mutually beneficial cooperation in organizing the Horde
     
    https://libking.ru/books/sci-/sci-history/101578-konstantin-penzev-russkiy-tsar-batyy.html?__cf_chl_jschl_tk__=IHLVowDhxi3yq_iQ1cF3iSsXaDTSzT8vBZ_dVvslGgY-1636376717-0-gaNycGzNCOU

    “Wagner” was internal conflict of elites, with a popular group, while the army is in Ukraine. It’s not related to the flat terrain in Russia. The military doesn’t shoot against Wagner.
     
    Are you this dense? Can Blackwater PMC in Iraq/Afghanistan simply go renegade and turn its army on the US mainland, and drive tanks over vast oceans?

    Russia is less more expansionary than USA, Brazil.
     
    When was Brazil ever been depicted in such a way?
    https://i.postimg.cc/zG02qL8n/Blancs-et-Jaunes-Le-Petit-Parisien-1904.jpg

    China is an example of culture manufacturer, old center, while Russia is culture importer
     
    Buddhism was imported from India. PRC was founded by a Swede-Jew-Kalmyk and a Georgian. Modern Chinese couldn’t have a conversation without Japanese-made Chinese words, introduced through Dutch learning. Half of Chinese dynasties were ruled by Tatars.

    China in its history have cucked to dozens of barbarian invasions and Prigozhin-like usurpers, its civilisation survived because enough men didn’t wallowing in self-abasement, like you are doing now, not a good look.

    Replies: @Dmitry

  325. @S
    Whatever Prigozhin does, or doesn't do, during the next few days, weeks, and months, may well tell us a lot about the exact nature of the events of yesterday.

    Should he unexpectedly die (or 'suicide') through a wide variety of means, or, simply 'clam up', and not speak publicly ever again on anything of substance, that will likely have meant that 'they got to him' in some fashion.

    In that case, the would be coup, a psyop perhaps, will have figuratively 'killed two birds with one stone', ie gotten rid of Prigozhin who had become more trouble than he was worth, and allowed for restructuring in Russia's armed forces, particularly in regards to command. Putin will have been provided the opportunity to show off his competent leadership skills in facing down a threat.

    However, if after retiring for a short time, and even though in 'exile' (in not very far away Belarus), Prigozhin soon returns to his outspoken political habits and ways, the would be coup/psyop may have had another primary purpose altogether.

    Everyone knows about Prigozhin's ability to bring about mass death and destruction, in particular towards Russians and Ukrainians. He himself has made sure people are aware of this aspect of his legend.

    The would be coup/psyop allows for Prigozhin to show another side of his legend to the Russisn people, to round it out as it were, ie that of his being the giver and preserver of life.

    Prighozin, in the midst of the would be coup, appeared to be only a step or two away from taking power. To achieve power, however, would have required the death of many Russians, and likely the death of Putin. Prigozhin, however, publicly and explicitly stood down to preserve life. He (refreshingly) gave life in this instance instead of his (usual) taking of it.

    The power dynamic between Prigozhin and Putin in this would be coup/psyop, is not dissimilar in certain ways to that in the clip below between the underdog gladiator Maximus and the Roman emperor Commodus.

    The gladiator, by showing unexpected mercy, by giving life, in contrast to taking it as the Emperor advocated, showed himself to be the better man of the two.

    Similarly, Prigozhin, by showing unexpected mercy in contrast to Putin's threats, showed himself (at least figuratively) to have been the better man.

    Should Prigozhin bloodlessly achieve power for himself in the Rusfed, replacing Putin in the process, the psyop of yesterday may ultimately prove to have been the critical factor.

    'Prigozhin the Merciful'

    https://youtu.be/vnZzqbraQFo

    Replies: @Beckow, @Emil Nikola Richard

    Intuitions have great attraction. They are mostly completely wrong.

    • LOL: S
  326. @Greasy William
    @Another Polish Perspective

    The 2nd vid below discusses all this.

    Tl;dw: Iran and Russia are watched over the same archangel, nicknamed "The Bear". While Iranians have traditionally regarded their symbol as the tiger, Jews have always associated Iran with the bear.

    Iran is the only state in the Russian version of NATO that was not also in the Warsaw pact

    Putin was born on Sukkot, the Messiah is expected to arrive on Sukkot

    Russia will nuke Israel (as the Iranians are far too primitive and stupid to ever successfully develop the 1940's technology required to build nuclear weapons, Magog will have to bail out his retarded younger brother)

    Then the Messiah will come

    The Messiah is to arrive in either 2027 or 2030. See first vid below
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vz5fC872Oek&t


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZvHpZLbsHZY

    Replies: @Another Polish Perspective, @A123, @Ivashka the fool

    Oh, the Gog-Magog war was WWII 1941-45, with Gog being Germans, and Magog Russians. As far as Ukrainians are “Waregs” they could be said to be “Gog” too…. interestingly, that would also explain their significant willingness to collaborate with Germany during WWII. On the other hand, Gog was to be accompanied by multitude of allies according to the Book of Ezekiel if I remember well, so maybe Ukrainians are not Gogites after all, and just another ally aside Norwegian, Dutch, Spanish, Hungarian etc formations.

    Messiah is the king of peace and this is the reason why SMO is actually SMO – because SMO is not “war”.

    But of course, trying to preserve the truth of prophecy is sometimes hard – as when labelling a war “special military operation”.

    Still, people almost never realize when prophecies come true. But, yes, not all prophecies come true – but here we are discussing the very serious Biblical prophecy.
    TPTB are of course interested in muddling the picture – they simultaneously adjust to [some] prophecies and spread lies about it. You know, everything is about timing…

    • Replies: @Greasy William
    @Another Polish Perspective

    Gog is a person, not a nation so your interpretation doesn't work. Judaism has always seen the War of Gog and Magog as a Russian-Iranian alliance against Israel.

    Replies: @Another Polish Perspective

  327. @Another Polish Perspective
    @Greasy William

    Oh, the Gog-Magog war was WWII 1941-45, with Gog being Germans, and Magog Russians. As far as Ukrainians are "Waregs" they could be said to be "Gog" too.... interestingly, that would also explain their significant willingness to collaborate with Germany during WWII. On the other hand, Gog was to be accompanied by multitude of allies according to the Book of Ezekiel if I remember well, so maybe Ukrainians are not Gogites after all, and just another ally aside Norwegian, Dutch, Spanish, Hungarian etc formations.

    Messiah is the king of peace and this is the reason why SMO is actually SMO - because SMO is not "war".

    But of course, trying to preserve the truth of prophecy is sometimes hard - as when labelling a war "special military operation".

    Still, people almost never realize when prophecies come true. But, yes, not all prophecies come true - but here we are discussing the very serious Biblical prophecy.
    TPTB are of course interested in muddling the picture - they simultaneously adjust to [some] prophecies and spread lies about it. You know, everything is about timing...

    Replies: @Greasy William

    Gog is a person, not a nation so your interpretation doesn’t work. Judaism has always seen the War of Gog and Magog as a Russian-Iranian alliance against Israel.

    • Replies: @Another Polish Perspective
    @Greasy William

    Oh no, the names are from the Book of Genesis "Table of Nations" fragment.
    Iran is actually one of Shem's son, I think Arpaxad.
    The seed of serpent wants to destroy Shem's sons, so is kindling wars among them, as Askheanzi Jews are also from Shem through Eber.

    But yes, Judaism is a religion of opinions and of followers of opinions [of rabbis] nowadays. Very different from Biblical Judaism, when opinions were not tolerated, just truths. It is simply a different religion now, with some trappings of the old one.

  328. @Ivashka the fool
    @Wokechoke

    They could have grown up becoming doctors, painters, sculptors, poets, writers, scientists...

    They could have had families of their own, with healthy and happy children...

    But now they're dead.

    At least they died yelling "Glory to Ukraine" !

    Same for some young Russian Identitarians who got recently killed on the frontline. Twenty something idealistic young men, who volunteered for the active combat duty and got killed for what exactly?

    For corrupt and dysfunctional "states" such as RusFed and Ukrostan?

    I wonder if AP would agree for his sons to die in this disgusting conflict. Dying a useless death, while behind the scenes, Deep State psyop experts manipulate opinions and align social and economic outcomes on a geopolitical level.

    Just like they did yesterday.

    Replies: @AP, @Dmitry

    Poor kids dying for social engineering simulacra

    This is the same of most wars in history. Do you think it was better to die in “Battle of Tannenberg”? “Battle of Tsushima”?
    http://tolstoy-lit.ru/tolstoy/publicistika/odumajtes.htm

    It’s better, from perspective of ordinary people, to live as a computer scientists and doctor.

    But even to prioritize human rights and perspective of the ordinary people, in large overpopulated society created after invention of agriculture, this requires the installation of democratic societies, with balance of power, wide distribution of power, equal access for information, independent legal system, government as servants of the citizenry.

    Even with this, it’s still possible for wars of the democracies. But if you don’t have this change of power balance, then the decisions can easily prioritize self-interest of rulers who don’t care about loss of some excess males from the population. Putin said, they could just die in accidents or alcoholism. https://www.pravda.com.ua/rus/news/2022/11/25/7377985/

    • Replies: @AP
    @Dmitry


    Poor kids dying for social engineering simulacra

    This is the same of most wars in history. Do you think it was better to die in “Battle of Tannenberg”? “Battle of Tsushima”?
     
    You are correct.

    Since people are discussing Celine, I'll repost a passage from Journey to the End of the Night (a great book), about this process, which began with mass literacy:


    It’s the philosophers . . . another point to look out for while we’re at it … who first started giving the people ideas . . , when all they’d known up until then was the catechism! They began, so they proclaimed, to educate the people . . . Ah! What truths they had to reveal! Beautiful! brilliant! unprecedented truths! And the people were dazzled! That’s it! they said. That’s the stuff! Let’s go and die for it! The people are always dying to die! That’s the way they are! ‘Long live Diderot!’ they yelled. And ‘Long live Voltaire!’ ….And long live everybody! Those guys at least don’t let the beloved people molder in ignorance and fetishism! They show the people the roads of Freedom! Emancipation! Things went fast after that! First teach everybody to read the papers! That’s the way to salvation! Hurry hurry! No more illiterates! We don’t need them anymore! Nothing but citizen-soldiers! Who vote! Who read! And who fight! And who march! And send kisses from the front! In no time the people were good and ripe! The enthusiasm of the liberated has to be good for something, doesn’t it? Danton wasn’t eloquent for the hell of it. With a few phrases, so rousing that we can still hear them today, he had the people mobilized before you could say fiddlesticks! That was when the first battalions of emancipated maniacs marched off! … the first voting, flagmatic suckers that Dumouriez led away to get themselves drilled full of holes in Flanders!… The free-gratis soldier . . . was something really new … So new that when Goethe arrived in Valmy… he was flabbergasted. At the sight of those ragged, impassioned cohorts, who had come of their own free will to get themselves disemboweled by the King of Prussia in defense of a patriotic fiction no one had ever heard of, Goethe realized that he still had much to learn. This day,’ he declaimed grandiloquently as befitted the habits of his genius, ‘marks the beginning of a new era!’ He could say that again! The system proved successful . . . pretty soon they were mass-producing heroes, and in the end, the system was so well perfected that they cost practically nothing. Everyone was delighted. Bismarck, the two Napoleons, Barrès, Elsa the Horsewoman. The religion of the flag promptly replaced the cult of heaven, an old cloud which had already been deflated by the Reformation and reduced to a network of episcopal money boxes. In olden times the fanatical fashion was: ‘Long live Jesus! Burn the heretics!’ . . . But heretics, after all, were few and voluntary . . . Whereas today vast hordes of men are fired with aim and purpose by cries of: ‘Hang the limp turnips! The juiceless lemons! The innocent readers! By the millions, eyes right!’ … Let whole legions of them perish, turn into smidgens, bleed, smolder in acid—and all that to make the Patrie more beloved, more fair, and more joyful! ”

     

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @Ivashka the fool

  329. @Greasy William
    @Another Polish Perspective

    Gog is a person, not a nation so your interpretation doesn't work. Judaism has always seen the War of Gog and Magog as a Russian-Iranian alliance against Israel.

    Replies: @Another Polish Perspective

    Oh no, the names are from the Book of Genesis “Table of Nations” fragment.
    Iran is actually one of Shem’s son, I think Arpaxad.
    The seed of serpent wants to destroy Shem’s sons, so is kindling wars among them, as Askheanzi Jews are also from Shem through Eber.

    But yes, Judaism is a religion of opinions and of followers of opinions [of rabbis] nowadays. Very different from Biblical Judaism, when opinions were not tolerated, just truths. It is simply a different religion now, with some trappings of the old one.

  330. A123 says: • Website
    @Greasy William
    @Another Polish Perspective

    The 2nd vid below discusses all this.

    Tl;dw: Iran and Russia are watched over the same archangel, nicknamed "The Bear". While Iranians have traditionally regarded their symbol as the tiger, Jews have always associated Iran with the bear.

    Iran is the only state in the Russian version of NATO that was not also in the Warsaw pact

    Putin was born on Sukkot, the Messiah is expected to arrive on Sukkot

    Russia will nuke Israel (as the Iranians are far too primitive and stupid to ever successfully develop the 1940's technology required to build nuclear weapons, Magog will have to bail out his retarded younger brother)

    Then the Messiah will come

    The Messiah is to arrive in either 2027 or 2030. See first vid below
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vz5fC872Oek&t


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZvHpZLbsHZY

    Replies: @Another Polish Perspective, @A123, @Ivashka the fool

    Iranians have traditionally regarded their symbol as the tiger,

    I thought that Iran used a lion & sun (not a tiger).

      

    Russia will nuke Israel

    Why would Putin bomb his ally (possibly friend) Netanyahu?

      

    PEACE 😇

    • Replies: @Greasy William
    @A123

    Putin is a power hungry snake. When he sees that taking on Israel is his only hope for continued expansion, he will turn against Israel.

    Although Putin is over 70 and if he leaves power in the next 10 years it will actually be Putin's successor, which I have always thought to be more likely

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @A123

  331. @A123
    @Greasy William


    Iranians have traditionally regarded their symbol as the tiger,
     
    I thought that Iran used a lion & sun (not a tiger).

     
    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b6/Imperial_Emblem_of_the_Qajar_Dynasty_(Lion_and_Sun).svg/170px-Imperial_Emblem_of_the_Qajar_Dynasty_(Lion_and_Sun).svg.png
     


    Russia will nuke Israel
     
    Why would Putin bomb his ally (possibly friend) Netanyahu?

     
    https://d.newsweek.com/en/full/451308/netanyahu-putin.jpg
     

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @Greasy William

    Putin is a power hungry snake. When he sees that taking on Israel is his only hope for continued expansion, he will turn against Israel.

    Although Putin is over 70 and if he leaves power in the next 10 years it will actually be Putin’s successor, which I have always thought to be more likely

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @Greasy William


    When he sees that taking on Israel is his only hope for continued expansion, he will turn against Israel.
     
    Israel has nukes and doesn't have a common border with Russia like Ukraine has. And Russia's soft power in Israel has not been completely destroyed like it was in Ukraine.

    Replies: @Greasy William

    , @A123
    @Greasy William


    Putin is a power hungry snake. When he sees that taking on Israel is his only hope for continued expansion, he will turn against Israel.
     
    Absorbing the territory based on current lines would be challenging for Russia's economy. The idea that Putin wants unlimited expansion does not hold up to scruitiny.

    Assuming that you are right, why would Putin not ask his buddy Netanyahu to help? There is zero need to "take on Israel". Lebanon becoming a Russian client state would improve the security of Palestinian Jews.

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @Greasy William

  332. @Greasy William
    @Wokechoke

    he was a wackadoodle who wrote about hate fucking Jewish girls in his later years. I don't think you want to be holding him up as some brilliant counter Jew expert. He was just another French nut who was reviled by practically everyone he knew

    Replies: @Wokechoke

    Holding up?

    Well, anyone who wants to can read knock off translations of Trifles For a Massacre.

    It’s funny stuff. Most of it true. There’s several mentions of how so few Jews with French passports died in 14-18…and the why.

    France lost 1.2 million dead and around 1000 Jews died defending La Patrie.

  333. @Greasy William
    @Another Polish Perspective

    The 2nd vid below discusses all this.

    Tl;dw: Iran and Russia are watched over the same archangel, nicknamed "The Bear". While Iranians have traditionally regarded their symbol as the tiger, Jews have always associated Iran with the bear.

    Iran is the only state in the Russian version of NATO that was not also in the Warsaw pact

    Putin was born on Sukkot, the Messiah is expected to arrive on Sukkot

    Russia will nuke Israel (as the Iranians are far too primitive and stupid to ever successfully develop the 1940's technology required to build nuclear weapons, Magog will have to bail out his retarded younger brother)

    Then the Messiah will come

    The Messiah is to arrive in either 2027 or 2030. See first vid below
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vz5fC872Oek&t


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZvHpZLbsHZY

    Replies: @Another Polish Perspective, @A123, @Ivashka the fool

    The prophecies made by the Demiurge are always lies and manipulations. He has been named Saklas (the Blind, as in the Blind Watchmaker) for a reason. His insight is limited, although it is of course stronger than the insight of common mortals. But Buddhas and Bodhisattvas do not lie and are a valid source of knowledge. We therefore know that your Messiah will not come, not in the coming years, not ever. Get used to this thought.

  334. @sudden death
    Hints of achieved quick intra-Wagner split, once again need to be reminded Prigozhin was Putin's acquintance from Petersburg times and not a founder of Wagner, like Utkin:

    The bald nonentity destroyed the Wagner PMC with his own hands. And framed everyone whomever he could. The assault on Moscow had to be led personally by Dmitry Utkin. He rode in one of the columns. Why it was necessary to start everything if you were blown away on the first day is definitely not clear. Again, it turned out to be just a senseless and merciless riot.

    Preparations for what happened were in advance. Everyone was instructed what to do and how to do it. As a result, a politician with now very dubious prospects managed to show just for one day and not more. The task was to provoke the evacuation of top officials and leadership from Moscow. Then start occupying the buildings of the ministries. The plans were grandiose. In fact, a politician with now very dubious prospects was blown away in one day. It's kind of a shame.

    Now Prigozhin forever in my blog is a dirty word. A nominal example of how you can screw up everything because of your own cowardice and insignificance.
     
    https://t.me/s/apwagner

    Replies: @sudden death

    Visual illustration of this, judging strictly just from the surface so far;)

    [MORE]

    • Agree: Ivashka the fool
    • LOL: QCIC
  335. S says:
    @Beckow
    @S


    ...Prighozin, in the midst of the would be coup, appeared to be only a step or two away from taking power.
     
    Are you serious? He was about trillion miles away from taking power - it was a charade. In a country of 150 million with security forces numbering in millions, a group of a few thousand mercenaries was going to take power? How?

    Prigozhin is the new Tichanovskaia...Guidados in the Western feverish imagination are multiplying. It is not a good omen - they are losing their grip on reality.

    It is ok, we see that at this point the elites are just f..ing with their own hapless people - total disrespect and total disinterest, they don't even try to explain themselves. We are back to some weird power dynamics...

    Replies: @S

    Are you serious?

    Quite.

    In a country of 150 million with security forces numbering in millions, a group of a few thousand mercenaries was going to take power?

    History is full of such examples. Surely you know that.

    How.

    The barrel of a gun.

    He was about trillion miles away from taking power – it was a charade.

    More seriously…

    I myself agree that it was probably a psyop, or, a ‘charade’ if you will. What you don’t like is my interpretation of this ‘charade’, or, ‘psyop’…ie the real possibility this was in reality about grooming Prigozhin to take power in Russia.

    Mind you, I’ve made it plain I am okay with republics, and am not for N S ideology, nor am I for what the US and UK is doing. I think the US/UK elites and hangers on should have been overthrown long ago.

    It’s very plain to myself (and I am sure many others) that the US/UK is attempting to do to Russia exactly what was done to Germany in WWII, ie utterly destroy it. I lean towards Guido Preparata’s hypothesis in Conjuring Hitler that the US/UK groomed Hitler to take power in Germany. I think it very possible in Prigozhin they have found their ‘literally another Hitler’, or, more likely, ‘worse than Hitler’, person they wish to take power in Russia.

    They want the most militant and radical manifestation of Russian identity expressed to 1) ensure WWIII take place, and 2) is as destructive as possible to the identity of the Russian people, and that of others, as possible, the same as was done to the Germans and their identity in WWII with Hitler and National Socialism.

    The proof is in the pudding, in this instance it’s what Prigozhin chooses to say and do during the next few days, weeks, and months.

    And as is so often the case, I’d rather others (including you) be correct, instead of me.

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @S

    It was Dyumin streamlining the power transition. That's about it.

    Replies: @QCIC

    , @Greasy William
    @S

    This isn't the US of the 1940's, though. Pretty much nobody would agree to be drafted. The US would have an army of 600k facing 5 million Russians. And China would certainly use the opportunity to attack Taiwan as well.

    Replies: @S

    , @Beckow
    @S


    ...as is so often the case, I’d rather others (including you) be correct, instead of me.
     
    Don't worry, we are.

    Nothing has changed in the situation: Kiev is cornered and lashing out, Kremlin still likes the Ukie people too much to just kill them, Nato still wants to destroy Russia.

    This will end in one of two ways:
    - Russia wins and decides what the new configuration will be in the region
    - The Kiev and its sponsors manage to escalate too much and we all evaporate...

    In any case, the region will be even poorer than it was, maybe with half the pre-Maidan population, and Zelko with his gang will most likely end up in Florida, bored to death by the subtropical ennui, sending endless alligator pictures to their friends...Mr.Hacks will stay in Phoenix but claim that "it was all worth it..."

    Replies: @S

  336. @S
    @Beckow


    Are you serious?
     
    Quite.

    In a country of 150 million with security forces numbering in millions, a group of a few thousand mercenaries was going to take power?
     
    History is full of such examples. Surely you know that.

    How.
     
    The barrel of a gun.

    He was about trillion miles away from taking power – it was a charade.
     
    More seriously...

    I myself agree that it was probably a psyop, or, a 'charade' if you will. What you don't like is my interpretation of this 'charade', or, 'psyop'...ie the real possibility this was in reality about grooming Prigozhin to take power in Russia.

    Mind you, I've made it plain I am okay with republics, and am not for N S ideology, nor am I for what the US and UK is doing. I think the US/UK elites and hangers on should have been overthrown long ago.

    It's very plain to myself (and I am sure many others) that the US/UK is attempting to do to Russia exactly what was done to Germany in WWII, ie utterly destroy it. I lean towards Guido Preparata's hypothesis in Conjuring Hitler that the US/UK groomed Hitler to take power in Germany. I think it very possible in Prigozhin they have found their 'literally another Hitler', or, more likely, 'worse than Hitler', person they wish to take power in Russia.

    They want the most militant and radical manifestation of Russian identity expressed to 1) ensure WWIII take place, and 2) is as destructive as possible to the identity of the Russian people, and that of others, as possible, the same as was done to the Germans and their identity in WWII with Hitler and National Socialism.

    The proof is in the pudding, in this instance it's what Prigozhin chooses to say and do during the next few days, weeks, and months.

    And as is so often the case, I'd rather others (including you) be correct, instead of me.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Greasy William, @Beckow

    It was Dyumin streamlining the power transition. That’s about it.

    • Replies: @QCIC
    @Ivashka the fool

    How does staging this help that power transition process? Does this apparently fake attempted coup keep some internal forces at bay--the Noviops, oligarchs, fifth columnists?

    Does throwing them off guard for two days matter?

    Putin's speech seemed reasonably sincere to me. How does a critical Russian observer grade it? Is Putin that good of an actor?

    Have there been reports of high profile arrests or VIPs fleeing Russia?

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

  337. @S
    @Beckow


    Are you serious?
     
    Quite.

    In a country of 150 million with security forces numbering in millions, a group of a few thousand mercenaries was going to take power?
     
    History is full of such examples. Surely you know that.

    How.
     
    The barrel of a gun.

    He was about trillion miles away from taking power – it was a charade.
     
    More seriously...

    I myself agree that it was probably a psyop, or, a 'charade' if you will. What you don't like is my interpretation of this 'charade', or, 'psyop'...ie the real possibility this was in reality about grooming Prigozhin to take power in Russia.

    Mind you, I've made it plain I am okay with republics, and am not for N S ideology, nor am I for what the US and UK is doing. I think the US/UK elites and hangers on should have been overthrown long ago.

    It's very plain to myself (and I am sure many others) that the US/UK is attempting to do to Russia exactly what was done to Germany in WWII, ie utterly destroy it. I lean towards Guido Preparata's hypothesis in Conjuring Hitler that the US/UK groomed Hitler to take power in Germany. I think it very possible in Prigozhin they have found their 'literally another Hitler', or, more likely, 'worse than Hitler', person they wish to take power in Russia.

    They want the most militant and radical manifestation of Russian identity expressed to 1) ensure WWIII take place, and 2) is as destructive as possible to the identity of the Russian people, and that of others, as possible, the same as was done to the Germans and their identity in WWII with Hitler and National Socialism.

    The proof is in the pudding, in this instance it's what Prigozhin chooses to say and do during the next few days, weeks, and months.

    And as is so often the case, I'd rather others (including you) be correct, instead of me.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Greasy William, @Beckow

    This isn’t the US of the 1940’s, though. Pretty much nobody would agree to be drafted. The US would have an army of 600k facing 5 million Russians. And China would certainly use the opportunity to attack Taiwan as well.

    • Agree: LondonBob
    • Replies: @S
    @Greasy William


    This isn’t the US of the 1940’s, though. Pretty much nobody would agree to be drafted.
     
    True, the world is not the same as it was in 1940. I think WWIII would quickly go nuclear.

    Replies: @Greasy William

  338. @Greasy William
    @S

    This isn't the US of the 1940's, though. Pretty much nobody would agree to be drafted. The US would have an army of 600k facing 5 million Russians. And China would certainly use the opportunity to attack Taiwan as well.

    Replies: @S

    This isn’t the US of the 1940’s, though. Pretty much nobody would agree to be drafted.

    True, the world is not the same as it was in 1940. I think WWIII would quickly go nuclear.

    • Replies: @Greasy William
    @S

    The Vilna Gaon said that the war of Gog and Magog would only last 12 minutes

  339. From Ivan Yakovina (an interesting political commentator who has fled Russia to Ukraine) on what Putin may have offered Prigo.

    Yakovina is alluding to a group of high level officials who have been gathering around Dyumin in Tula, including people such as Sechin, FSB generals, oligarchs (I mentioned this group in the previous threads when speaking about who may be behind Prigo). Before this attempted “takeover” these were supposedly Prigo’s allies. So Dyumin could’ve served as the guarantor (and mediator) between Putin and Prigo.

    Yakovina’s version:

    Prigo backed down only temporarily. His mutiny was not stomped out, they themselves left. Prigo has had demands towards the Russian government for a long time now (bordering on blackmail). So far he received most of the things he asked, he would go quiet but then demands would grow again. Prigo may have offered Putin that he would not capture Kremlin, if he fulfills his demands – his people in the MOD, removal of Shoigu and Gerasimov. This would allow Prigo to control all of the Russian army + his own military company, so he would have all the power and would have nothing to fear (including from the FSB). Possibly asked for resources, money, etc. If Putin agreed to this, most likely the top of the MOD will change. If that doesn’t happen, then Prigo could go back to Moscow (he has the means). Prigo’s mutiny was not stomped out, the leaders were not liquidated. Yakovina compares this march to plain, primitive type of racketeering.

    Prigo has said he wants to “protect” Belgorod, he was at first told “no”. They gave Belgorod to Kadyrov*, they are looting the local population, there is enough to loot since the oblast is affluent. One of the bargaining chips could’ve been the transfer of Belgorod in order to create a military base there under Prigo’s leadership (a feudal camp similar to what Chechnya is for Kadyrov). The most recent info is that Kadyrovites are leaving Belgorod. If this is true, then this theory might be valid.

    Prigo does not want to sit on the crown, he wants to be a backroom operator. A grey cardinal. It made sense for Putin to give him these things to avert a real takeover.

    [MORE]

    In order for things to not look this way, Prigo will get his resources a bit later, not right away. There needs to be a brief pause. To guarantee the deal, Dyumin was brought in. If this version is believable, Prigo will lay low for a while, with his men (somewhere in the steppe). If Putin does not fulfill his end of the deal, the mutiny can come back or at least some violent action. The prikol (the funny or crazy part) is that even if Putin gives Prigo what he wants, the mutiny can still come back, because when a criminal sees that he can demand things and get away with it (лох разводиться – the loser agrees to be blackmailed), he can come back asking for more. Bit by bit, if this continues, Prigo can take over and Putin could become a merely symbolic figure. This is what Prigo wants, according to Yakovina, that Prigo can pull Putin by his strings. In order to avert this scenario, Putin needs to liquidate Prigo and the whole Wagner, but Putin does not have the strength for it. The Russian state is not capable of waging two wars at once – one against Ukraine and another against Wagner and their supporters. Wagner was riding around the country unhindered, downing helicopters.

    What this means for Russia: The military is demoralized. The mega vatniks, z voenkors, are frustrated, dumbfounded how they ended up on the cusp of a civil war. They did not know who to support, Putin or Prigo.

    The armed forces, seeing that Putin fled to Valdai, lost their loyalty to Putin. Bureaucrats fled Moscow to wherever they could. They gain a lot from Putin’s system, but not so much that they would deliberately fight and die for it. The population greeted Wagner (!!) where they arrived (see footage from Rostov).

    The functioning of the state institutions is compromised, everything was functioning based on fear. If the Ukrainian military manage to break certain areas of the front, the Wagnerites (or other forces) can keep raiding Russia. 90% of the military are in Ukraine, Rosgvardia are in Moscow. They will flee at the sight of real tanks. The system is fragile and Putin is helpless.

    Hypothetically, the Ukrainian units could enter southern Russia and then re-enter Luhansk and recover their territories there.

    Btw, when you analyze this version from Yakovina, you can start to understand what Prigo may have been sitting for back in the early 1990s.

    * Denis from RDK who was raiding the Belgorod region, acknowledged that the Kadyrovites were put in charge there, and that they are already harassing Russian women. Overall, Belgorod is important, because the Russian freedom fighters had the intention of creating a buffer zone there for Ukraine. Maybe they shouldn’t have been so vocal about it, as now the Russian state will finally and act and maybe put someone capable in charge there. It is interesting that both Prigo / Wagner and RDK / Legion of Freedom of Russia were vying for this oblast. But they have not yet colluded or maybe even were never meant to collude (as they are on opposite sides of the barricades, even if they do share the political niche to some extent, there is a very slight overlap there).

    In Russian (starts around 12:00):

    • Replies: @Beckow
    @LatW

    Ok, we get that you are only transmitting some loose speculations by a Ukie guy who is looking for a way out from Kiev's current cul-de-sac. Fine, but I thought you were more rational.

    It is just bs, the sophomoric "if", "soon", vapid yapping by a cornered animal. None of it remotely makes any sense. Prigo is a small player, there is nobody behind him. He over-reached as guys like that often do. This was also probably stage-managed to achieve other things: consolidate normies support for Kremlin, move Wagner troops to Belarus, make some personnel changes.

    If you are taking it seriously, well, it kind of explains your previous irrational 'predictions' of a massive Ukie offensive or an "uprising" among the marginals in Russia. You do know that displaying irrational hope is a sign of despair? Waiting for deux-ex-machina in real life doesn't work - this is not a theatre play.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

    , @QCIC
    @LatW

    This seems to be the expected fake backstory for the whole psyop.

    I have never seen a justification for why Prigozhin would have enough clout (power) to survive his mouthing off for the past year. He has always looked totally replaceable to me, even though he plays a pretty good combined thug-court jester. One good answer is that he is a Kremlin puppet following a script.

    I read the number of troops involved in his march to Moscow was something like 5000. They could not do much without full support from the military. If Putin announced they were treasonous I think the military would roll them up immediately and the Kremlin would publish some highly believable story along the lines of "once a criminal, always a criminal".

    If I understand it, Prigozhin was pushing for a more aggressive war effort. This is a very incremental position since the war is already very aggressive (200,000 Ukie KIA?). I don't think such an incremental position could stir up broad support. A full antiwar position might do something, but Prigozhin cannot play that role and there seems to be little support for it anyway.

    I think we need to see if the government passes any new laws this week.

    , @Wokechoke
    @LatW

    They probably told Prigozhid that they’d publicly call him a Zhid.

    You may call him a swindler and conman a crook, water rolls off a ducks back, but call him a Jew…see how he recoils!

  340. @A123
    The Flash and Elemental Flop Disastrously

    The Flash @$140MM
    Elemental @$56MM

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=qhSOTBhI95Y

    Both of these were ~$200MM production budget. Between marketing and theatre's share, the general rule is that it takes 2.5x times production to reach break even. Neither of these will reach $500MM. Elemental being a horrifying loss.

    And, Lucasfilm will be opening Indiana Jones and the Dial of Disrespect this weekend. The projections for that film, based on advance sales, look grim. Due to reshoots and other problems, its budget is officially stated as $300MM. Many believe its production cost is much higher.

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @Another Polish Perspective

    Are you in movie business maybe…?

    If so, do you know where this idea of making movies from comic books about superheros IN SUCH A QUANTITY came from…?! It is like cosplay becoming mainstream movie making…

    Except Batman, majority of these movies are really cartoonish, if not downright ridiculous.

    • Replies: @A123
    @Another Polish Perspective


    Are you in movie business maybe…?
     
    No... But I am a sci-fi geek all the way back to my youth. Which means that I have a personal stake in cherished childhood icons being trashed.

    where this idea of making movies from comic books about superheros IN SUCH A QUANTITY came from
     
    The Marvel Cinematic Universe [MCU] was like printing money culminating in Phase III with Avengers: Infinity War & Endgame. This wrapped the stories for several current actors/characters.

    The normal comic book process would be a like-for-like replacement with subtle tweaks to open new stories. Instead, things went off a cliff

    • The CCP's WUHAN -19 virus got loose.
    • The "streaming wars" needed content.
    • Supervision became lax
    • Activists with Trump Derangement Syndrome [TDS] were triggered

    The need for shorter, serial releases was in flight at the time that Phase IV launched. This became vulnerable to The Message and the M-SHE-U "bait & switch" was launched:

    ▫ Wanda Vision
    ▫ She Hulk
    ▫ Ms. Marvel
    ▫ Kate Bishop (a.k.a. Hawkeye)
    ▫ Sylvie (a.k.a. Loki)

    Then put the Phase IV movies on top of this.

     
    https://i.pinimg.com/originals/4c/b8/0f/4cb80f9b2da6f06c06a389741b81bc9d.jpg
     

    • Eternals was aggressively multicultural (and made no sense)
    • America Chavez (a.k.a. Dr. Strange II) was hijacked by Stronger Female Lead
    • Love & Thunder = Written by Taika Waititi

    Houston, The Sheer F*cking Hubris has landed. Its not just the quantity... Its all bad.
    ____

    Marvel and Star Wars are in the same boat. So much damage has been done to the IP. They need to get rid of Kathleen Kennedy and perform some type of reboot and/or sale.

    Spielberg ruthlessly & publicly trampled KK.

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=NVqhTnjZZHc

    So there are tiny slivers of almost hope. However, even if changes are made today there are still almost 2 years of unwatchable dreck in the production pipeline.

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @QCIC

  341. @LatW
    From Ivan Yakovina (an interesting political commentator who has fled Russia to Ukraine) on what Putin may have offered Prigo.

    Yakovina is alluding to a group of high level officials who have been gathering around Dyumin in Tula, including people such as Sechin, FSB generals, oligarchs (I mentioned this group in the previous threads when speaking about who may be behind Prigo). Before this attempted "takeover" these were supposedly Prigo's allies. So Dyumin could've served as the guarantor (and mediator) between Putin and Prigo.

    Yakovina's version:

    Prigo backed down only temporarily. His mutiny was not stomped out, they themselves left. Prigo has had demands towards the Russian government for a long time now (bordering on blackmail). So far he received most of the things he asked, he would go quiet but then demands would grow again. Prigo may have offered Putin that he would not capture Kremlin, if he fulfills his demands - his people in the MOD, removal of Shoigu and Gerasimov. This would allow Prigo to control all of the Russian army + his own military company, so he would have all the power and would have nothing to fear (including from the FSB). Possibly asked for resources, money, etc. If Putin agreed to this, most likely the top of the MOD will change. If that doesn't happen, then Prigo could go back to Moscow (he has the means). Prigo's mutiny was not stomped out, the leaders were not liquidated. Yakovina compares this march to plain, primitive type of racketeering.

    Prigo has said he wants to "protect" Belgorod, he was at first told "no". They gave Belgorod to Kadyrov*, they are looting the local population, there is enough to loot since the oblast is affluent. One of the bargaining chips could've been the transfer of Belgorod in order to create a military base there under Prigo's leadership (a feudal camp similar to what Chechnya is for Kadyrov). The most recent info is that Kadyrovites are leaving Belgorod. If this is true, then this theory might be valid.

    Prigo does not want to sit on the crown, he wants to be a backroom operator. A grey cardinal. It made sense for Putin to give him these things to avert a real takeover.

    In order for things to not look this way, Prigo will get his resources a bit later, not right away. There needs to be a brief pause. To guarantee the deal, Dyumin was brought in. If this version is believable, Prigo will lay low for a while, with his men (somewhere in the steppe). If Putin does not fulfill his end of the deal, the mutiny can come back or at least some violent action. The prikol (the funny or crazy part) is that even if Putin gives Prigo what he wants, the mutiny can still come back, because when a criminal sees that he can demand things and get away with it (лох разводиться - the loser agrees to be blackmailed), he can come back asking for more. Bit by bit, if this continues, Prigo can take over and Putin could become a merely symbolic figure. This is what Prigo wants, according to Yakovina, that Prigo can pull Putin by his strings. In order to avert this scenario, Putin needs to liquidate Prigo and the whole Wagner, but Putin does not have the strength for it. The Russian state is not capable of waging two wars at once - one against Ukraine and another against Wagner and their supporters. Wagner was riding around the country unhindered, downing helicopters.

    What this means for Russia: The military is demoralized. The mega vatniks, z voenkors, are frustrated, dumbfounded how they ended up on the cusp of a civil war. They did not know who to support, Putin or Prigo.

    The armed forces, seeing that Putin fled to Valdai, lost their loyalty to Putin. Bureaucrats fled Moscow to wherever they could. They gain a lot from Putin's system, but not so much that they would deliberately fight and die for it. The population greeted Wagner (!!) where they arrived (see footage from Rostov).

    The functioning of the state institutions is compromised, everything was functioning based on fear. If the Ukrainian military manage to break certain areas of the front, the Wagnerites (or other forces) can keep raiding Russia. 90% of the military are in Ukraine, Rosgvardia are in Moscow. They will flee at the sight of real tanks. The system is fragile and Putin is helpless.

    Hypothetically, the Ukrainian units could enter southern Russia and then re-enter Luhansk and recover their territories there.

    Btw, when you analyze this version from Yakovina, you can start to understand what Prigo may have been sitting for back in the early 1990s.

    * Denis from RDK who was raiding the Belgorod region, acknowledged that the Kadyrovites were put in charge there, and that they are already harassing Russian women. Overall, Belgorod is important, because the Russian freedom fighters had the intention of creating a buffer zone there for Ukraine. Maybe they shouldn't have been so vocal about it, as now the Russian state will finally and act and maybe put someone capable in charge there. It is interesting that both Prigo / Wagner and RDK / Legion of Freedom of Russia were vying for this oblast. But they have not yet colluded or maybe even were never meant to collude (as they are on opposite sides of the barricades, even if they do share the political niche to some extent, there is a very slight overlap there).

    In Russian (starts around 12:00):

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aVleiICqZoM

    Replies: @Beckow, @QCIC, @Wokechoke

    Ok, we get that you are only transmitting some loose speculations by a Ukie guy who is looking for a way out from Kiev’s current cul-de-sac. Fine, but I thought you were more rational.

    It is just bs, the sophomoric “if”, “soon”, vapid yapping by a cornered animal. None of it remotely makes any sense. Prigo is a small player, there is nobody behind him. He over-reached as guys like that often do. This was also probably stage-managed to achieve other things: consolidate normies support for Kremlin, move Wagner troops to Belarus, make some personnel changes.

    If you are taking it seriously, well, it kind of explains your previous irrational ‘predictions’ of a massive Ukie offensive or an “uprising” among the marginals in Russia. You do know that displaying irrational hope is a sign of despair? Waiting for deux-ex-machina in real life doesn’t work – this is not a theatre play.

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @Beckow

    Behind Wagner there is Dyumin and the GRU. They have basically just killed several birds at once with a single stone through the Wagnerite drama. 1) Made near certain that Dyumin will be the RF president in 2024 2) Tossed the Shoigu and the remnants of the Yeltsin's family in a corner 3) Showed the West that it is dangerous to pressure RF too hard because it is "fragile" and might break down allowing the bad guys near the nuclear weapons stockpile 4) Therefore made a deal on Ukrainian war more probable 5) Made old Pynya look like a frayer (Акела промахнулся) which would hasten his retirement. Excellent work by Dyumin's circle, Duma Utkin being one of its inner members. Prigozhin is basically a hired manager and a PR man, him being Jewish shelters Utkin and some others among the Wagnerites from being labeled racist/fascist (which some of them are since the 1st War in Chechnya times).

    Replies: @Beckow

  342. @S
    @Beckow


    Are you serious?
     
    Quite.

    In a country of 150 million with security forces numbering in millions, a group of a few thousand mercenaries was going to take power?
     
    History is full of such examples. Surely you know that.

    How.
     
    The barrel of a gun.

    He was about trillion miles away from taking power – it was a charade.
     
    More seriously...

    I myself agree that it was probably a psyop, or, a 'charade' if you will. What you don't like is my interpretation of this 'charade', or, 'psyop'...ie the real possibility this was in reality about grooming Prigozhin to take power in Russia.

    Mind you, I've made it plain I am okay with republics, and am not for N S ideology, nor am I for what the US and UK is doing. I think the US/UK elites and hangers on should have been overthrown long ago.

    It's very plain to myself (and I am sure many others) that the US/UK is attempting to do to Russia exactly what was done to Germany in WWII, ie utterly destroy it. I lean towards Guido Preparata's hypothesis in Conjuring Hitler that the US/UK groomed Hitler to take power in Germany. I think it very possible in Prigozhin they have found their 'literally another Hitler', or, more likely, 'worse than Hitler', person they wish to take power in Russia.

    They want the most militant and radical manifestation of Russian identity expressed to 1) ensure WWIII take place, and 2) is as destructive as possible to the identity of the Russian people, and that of others, as possible, the same as was done to the Germans and their identity in WWII with Hitler and National Socialism.

    The proof is in the pudding, in this instance it's what Prigozhin chooses to say and do during the next few days, weeks, and months.

    And as is so often the case, I'd rather others (including you) be correct, instead of me.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Greasy William, @Beckow

    …as is so often the case, I’d rather others (including you) be correct, instead of me.

    Don’t worry, we are.

    Nothing has changed in the situation: Kiev is cornered and lashing out, Kremlin still likes the Ukie people too much to just kill them, Nato still wants to destroy Russia.

    This will end in one of two ways:
    – Russia wins and decides what the new configuration will be in the region
    – The Kiev and its sponsors manage to escalate too much and we all evaporate…

    In any case, the region will be even poorer than it was, maybe with half the pre-Maidan population, and Zelko with his gang will most likely end up in Florida, bored to death by the subtropical ennui, sending endless alligator pictures to their friends…Mr.Hacks will stay in Phoenix but claim that “it was all worth it…

    • Agree: QCIC
    • Replies: @S
    @Beckow



    …as is so often the case, I’d rather others (including you) be correct, instead of me.

     

    Don’t worry, we are.
     
    I'm not worried.

    On the other hand, your response to what is ultimately simply a hypothesis of mine makes me think you might be.

    I had no intention of triggering anyone with my post.

    As to who was right, we'll just have to wait and see how events unfold. It could be none of us got it right.
  343. @Ivashka the fool
    @S

    It was Dyumin streamlining the power transition. That's about it.

    Replies: @QCIC

    How does staging this help that power transition process? Does this apparently fake attempted coup keep some internal forces at bay–the Noviops, oligarchs, fifth columnists?

    Does throwing them off guard for two days matter?

    Putin’s speech seemed reasonably sincere to me. How does a critical Russian observer grade it? Is Putin that good of an actor?

    Have there been reports of high profile arrests or VIPs fleeing Russia?

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @QCIC

    See my reply to Beckow above. Also I have described what I think in other comments replying to AP. Especially about Dyumin's role and what he gained from all this circus.

  344. @Beckow
    @LatW

    Ok, we get that you are only transmitting some loose speculations by a Ukie guy who is looking for a way out from Kiev's current cul-de-sac. Fine, but I thought you were more rational.

    It is just bs, the sophomoric "if", "soon", vapid yapping by a cornered animal. None of it remotely makes any sense. Prigo is a small player, there is nobody behind him. He over-reached as guys like that often do. This was also probably stage-managed to achieve other things: consolidate normies support for Kremlin, move Wagner troops to Belarus, make some personnel changes.

    If you are taking it seriously, well, it kind of explains your previous irrational 'predictions' of a massive Ukie offensive or an "uprising" among the marginals in Russia. You do know that displaying irrational hope is a sign of despair? Waiting for deux-ex-machina in real life doesn't work - this is not a theatre play.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

    Behind Wagner there is Dyumin and the GRU. They have basically just killed several birds at once with a single stone through the Wagnerite drama. 1) Made near certain that Dyumin will be the RF president in 2024 2) Tossed the Shoigu and the remnants of the Yeltsin’s family in a corner 3) Showed the West that it is dangerous to pressure RF too hard because it is “fragile” and might break down allowing the bad guys near the nuclear weapons stockpile 4) Therefore made a deal on Ukrainian war more probable 5) Made old Pynya look like a frayer (Акела промахнулся) which would hasten his retirement. Excellent work by Dyumin’s circle, Duma Utkin being one of its inner members. Prigozhin is basically a hired manager and a PR man, him being Jewish shelters Utkin and some others among the Wagnerites from being labeled racist/fascist (which some of them are since the 1st War in Chechnya times).

    • Replies: @Beckow
    @Ivashka the fool

    I agree with 3) and 4)...the other points are speculations. I also agree that Prigo is a 'hired man', that's what I meant.

    The main impact of this bizarre probably mostly staged event is to strengthen the support of the massive majority in Russia (80-90%) for the moderate Putin gment. And to rattle the West that "shit can hit the fan very easily".

    But it wasn't a "coup" - it simply mathematically doesn't add up in a country of 150 million people, maybe a "mini-coup", but those are not meant to succeed. There was literally zero chance that it would go to Moscow. The crowds supporting it (but it is very hard to judge) will push the gment to a more assertive stance - in that way it was possibly also stage-managed ("see, people want more blood! lets give it to them")

    Russia is signaling that time to make a deal will soon end and the moderate methods may also end. That means more instability, more volatility. But if the West is blind to the best possible - and actually available - outcome, what else would we expect?

    Replies: @QCIC, @AP, @Yevardian

  345. @QCIC
    @Ivashka the fool

    How does staging this help that power transition process? Does this apparently fake attempted coup keep some internal forces at bay--the Noviops, oligarchs, fifth columnists?

    Does throwing them off guard for two days matter?

    Putin's speech seemed reasonably sincere to me. How does a critical Russian observer grade it? Is Putin that good of an actor?

    Have there been reports of high profile arrests or VIPs fleeing Russia?

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

    See my reply to Beckow above. Also I have described what I think in other comments replying to AP. Especially about Dyumin’s role and what he gained from all this circus.

  346. @Sean
    @Dmitry

    De Maistre found to his horror in the salons of St Petersburg, that instead of social hierarchy and the strong hand of law, the fashionable etherealities of French revolutionary philosophy he was fleeing had been taken up by the Russian intelligentsia.


    http://www.martin-van-creveld.com/2336-2/
    While it is always possible to find precedents—going back, in this ease, to the great 17th-century Cossack revolt against Poland/Lithuania {I've read it was against the arrendator Jews of the Polish lords Sean}—Ukrainian nationalism is mainly a product of the nineteenth century when country’s western provinces were strongly influenced by the Austrian empire. Much later this fact enabled Russian President Vladimir Putin to claim that it was not a native movement but an imported one..

    In Ukraine as in other countries, initially nationalism was generated by a tiny urban elite of highly cultured literati by no means representative of the people as a whole. In Ukraine as in other countries, members of this elite sometimes went to the countryside in the hope of discovering and preserving “aboriginal” and “pure” traditions in which to anchor their views. In Ukraine as in other countries, some such traditions were invented almost ex nihil. Old or new, they provided people—mainly Russians, Ukrainians, and Poles—with additional reasons for fighting each other tooth and nail; nowhere more so than in the “Bloodlands” (historian Timothy D. Snyder) of Eastern Europe.

    On the other hand, many famous “Ukrainian” (in the sense that they were born in Ukraine) writers actually wrote in Russian. Nikolai Gogol, the best-known “Ukrainian” writer of all, was born in Sorochyntsi, a Cossack village in what is now Ukraine’s Poltava Oblast, but wrote in Russian. The same applied to Anna Akhmatova and Isaac Babel (both from Odessa) and Mikhail Bulgakov (from Kiev). This list could easily be extended
     

    Replies: @Dmitry, @AP

    There is a different situation in the last 20 years, as large part of the elites in Russia have exited from living in Russia mostly around 2005-2015.

    There was the emigration of the elites mostly after around 2005, while some are still managing Russia, there are also their property and assets outside Russia.

    I feel most of educated internal discussion in Russia are middle class people, who are quite “rooted” (i.e. “trapped”) in Russia. In last decade, liberal ideology in Russia is usually practical, boring and sensible for improving life, related to improving power of the ordinary people, urbanism (cleaning streets etc), reducing open borders immigration, improving the external relations with the powerful countries etc. It has also reduced influence with the authorities though and it’s less elite than the liberalism in the past.

    • Replies: @Sean
    @Dmitry


    There was the emigration of the elites mostly after around 2005, while some are still managing Russia, there are also their property and assets outside Russia.
     
    Putin's SMO really stuck it to them, they are now under very close scutiny and politicians in the West back away from them for fear of being tagged as taking money from Russian oligarchs; while capital flight elite money may be safe from Putin in the West it is now very vulnerable to expropriatory taxes by the West. Russia has money in the West but if it is touched the Chinese would take all their own away out of fear it could be grabbed in some future political crisis.

    Russia is an odd country. I have read that uniquely the age of mothers fell in it for decades. Meanwhile in the West and everywhere else comparable, women had their first child at older and older ages

    Replies: @Dmitry

  347. @LatW
    From Ivan Yakovina (an interesting political commentator who has fled Russia to Ukraine) on what Putin may have offered Prigo.

    Yakovina is alluding to a group of high level officials who have been gathering around Dyumin in Tula, including people such as Sechin, FSB generals, oligarchs (I mentioned this group in the previous threads when speaking about who may be behind Prigo). Before this attempted "takeover" these were supposedly Prigo's allies. So Dyumin could've served as the guarantor (and mediator) between Putin and Prigo.

    Yakovina's version:

    Prigo backed down only temporarily. His mutiny was not stomped out, they themselves left. Prigo has had demands towards the Russian government for a long time now (bordering on blackmail). So far he received most of the things he asked, he would go quiet but then demands would grow again. Prigo may have offered Putin that he would not capture Kremlin, if he fulfills his demands - his people in the MOD, removal of Shoigu and Gerasimov. This would allow Prigo to control all of the Russian army + his own military company, so he would have all the power and would have nothing to fear (including from the FSB). Possibly asked for resources, money, etc. If Putin agreed to this, most likely the top of the MOD will change. If that doesn't happen, then Prigo could go back to Moscow (he has the means). Prigo's mutiny was not stomped out, the leaders were not liquidated. Yakovina compares this march to plain, primitive type of racketeering.

    Prigo has said he wants to "protect" Belgorod, he was at first told "no". They gave Belgorod to Kadyrov*, they are looting the local population, there is enough to loot since the oblast is affluent. One of the bargaining chips could've been the transfer of Belgorod in order to create a military base there under Prigo's leadership (a feudal camp similar to what Chechnya is for Kadyrov). The most recent info is that Kadyrovites are leaving Belgorod. If this is true, then this theory might be valid.

    Prigo does not want to sit on the crown, he wants to be a backroom operator. A grey cardinal. It made sense for Putin to give him these things to avert a real takeover.

    In order for things to not look this way, Prigo will get his resources a bit later, not right away. There needs to be a brief pause. To guarantee the deal, Dyumin was brought in. If this version is believable, Prigo will lay low for a while, with his men (somewhere in the steppe). If Putin does not fulfill his end of the deal, the mutiny can come back or at least some violent action. The prikol (the funny or crazy part) is that even if Putin gives Prigo what he wants, the mutiny can still come back, because when a criminal sees that he can demand things and get away with it (лох разводиться - the loser agrees to be blackmailed), he can come back asking for more. Bit by bit, if this continues, Prigo can take over and Putin could become a merely symbolic figure. This is what Prigo wants, according to Yakovina, that Prigo can pull Putin by his strings. In order to avert this scenario, Putin needs to liquidate Prigo and the whole Wagner, but Putin does not have the strength for it. The Russian state is not capable of waging two wars at once - one against Ukraine and another against Wagner and their supporters. Wagner was riding around the country unhindered, downing helicopters.

    What this means for Russia: The military is demoralized. The mega vatniks, z voenkors, are frustrated, dumbfounded how they ended up on the cusp of a civil war. They did not know who to support, Putin or Prigo.

    The armed forces, seeing that Putin fled to Valdai, lost their loyalty to Putin. Bureaucrats fled Moscow to wherever they could. They gain a lot from Putin's system, but not so much that they would deliberately fight and die for it. The population greeted Wagner (!!) where they arrived (see footage from Rostov).

    The functioning of the state institutions is compromised, everything was functioning based on fear. If the Ukrainian military manage to break certain areas of the front, the Wagnerites (or other forces) can keep raiding Russia. 90% of the military are in Ukraine, Rosgvardia are in Moscow. They will flee at the sight of real tanks. The system is fragile and Putin is helpless.

    Hypothetically, the Ukrainian units could enter southern Russia and then re-enter Luhansk and recover their territories there.

    Btw, when you analyze this version from Yakovina, you can start to understand what Prigo may have been sitting for back in the early 1990s.

    * Denis from RDK who was raiding the Belgorod region, acknowledged that the Kadyrovites were put in charge there, and that they are already harassing Russian women. Overall, Belgorod is important, because the Russian freedom fighters had the intention of creating a buffer zone there for Ukraine. Maybe they shouldn't have been so vocal about it, as now the Russian state will finally and act and maybe put someone capable in charge there. It is interesting that both Prigo / Wagner and RDK / Legion of Freedom of Russia were vying for this oblast. But they have not yet colluded or maybe even were never meant to collude (as they are on opposite sides of the barricades, even if they do share the political niche to some extent, there is a very slight overlap there).

    In Russian (starts around 12:00):

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aVleiICqZoM

    Replies: @Beckow, @QCIC, @Wokechoke

    This seems to be the expected fake backstory for the whole psyop.

    I have never seen a justification for why Prigozhin would have enough clout (power) to survive his mouthing off for the past year. He has always looked totally replaceable to me, even though he plays a pretty good combined thug-court jester. One good answer is that he is a Kremlin puppet following a script.

    I read the number of troops involved in his march to Moscow was something like 5000. They could not do much without full support from the military. If Putin announced they were treasonous I think the military would roll them up immediately and the Kremlin would publish some highly believable story along the lines of “once a criminal, always a criminal”.

    If I understand it, Prigozhin was pushing for a more aggressive war effort. This is a very incremental position since the war is already very aggressive (200,000 Ukie KIA?). I don’t think such an incremental position could stir up broad support. A full antiwar position might do something, but Prigozhin cannot play that role and there seems to be little support for it anyway.

    I think we need to see if the government passes any new laws this week.

  348. @Ivashka the fool
    @Beckow

    Behind Wagner there is Dyumin and the GRU. They have basically just killed several birds at once with a single stone through the Wagnerite drama. 1) Made near certain that Dyumin will be the RF president in 2024 2) Tossed the Shoigu and the remnants of the Yeltsin's family in a corner 3) Showed the West that it is dangerous to pressure RF too hard because it is "fragile" and might break down allowing the bad guys near the nuclear weapons stockpile 4) Therefore made a deal on Ukrainian war more probable 5) Made old Pynya look like a frayer (Акела промахнулся) which would hasten his retirement. Excellent work by Dyumin's circle, Duma Utkin being one of its inner members. Prigozhin is basically a hired manager and a PR man, him being Jewish shelters Utkin and some others among the Wagnerites from being labeled racist/fascist (which some of them are since the 1st War in Chechnya times).

    Replies: @Beckow

    I agree with 3) and 4)…the other points are speculations. I also agree that Prigo is a ‘hired man’, that’s what I meant.

    The main impact of this bizarre probably mostly staged event is to strengthen the support of the massive majority in Russia (80-90%) for the moderate Putin gment. And to rattle the West that “shit can hit the fan very easily“.

    But it wasn’t a “coup” – it simply mathematically doesn’t add up in a country of 150 million people, maybe a “mini-coup”, but those are not meant to succeed. There was literally zero chance that it would go to Moscow. The crowds supporting it (but it is very hard to judge) will push the gment to a more assertive stance – in that way it was possibly also stage-managed (“see, people want more blood! lets give it to them”)

    Russia is signaling that time to make a deal will soon end and the moderate methods may also end. That means more instability, more volatility. But if the West is blind to the best possible – and actually available – outcome, what else would we expect?

    • Replies: @QCIC
    @Beckow

    Scott Ritter claimed Ukrainian teams were caught preparing sabotage in Moscow as part of this. Has this been confirmed?

    Of course, this might be the kind of information the Russians would release to make the fake coup more believable, like shooting down the helicopter. However, it directly links Prigozhin to the Ukrainians which is a different very treasonous narrative. Alternatively, the Ukrainians could have fabricated this information to muddy the water.

    If the Ukrainians were actually there and preparing for a very serious provocation, it might be a reasonable explanation for why the government would actually stage such a coup. Maybe the coup gives some trigger for extraordinary FSB actions or something like that.

    If this simply blows over with no sensible explanation, something like a Western-Ukie terror attack might be a good theory. Of course if Putin is as wise as some believe, most of Ivashka's view could still come to pass, with the Kremlin following the mantra of "let no crisis go to waste".

    , @AP
    @Beckow


    The main impact of this bizarre probably mostly staged event is to strengthen the support of the massive majority in Russia (80-90%) for the moderate Putin gment. And to rattle the West that “shit can hit the fan very easily“.
     
    You are wrong as usual. Wagner is more popular than Putin’s government among ordinary Russians.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

    , @Yevardian
    @Beckow

    The very public ovation Wagner received whilst leaving Rostov seems to imply otherwise.

    No defender of Prigozhin here, but Shoigu is worse.

    Replies: @Beckow, @Gerard1234

  349. A123 says: • Website
    @Another Polish Perspective
    @A123

    Are you in movie business maybe...?

    If so, do you know where this idea of making movies from comic books about superheros IN SUCH A QUANTITY came from...?! It is like cosplay becoming mainstream movie making...

    Except Batman, majority of these movies are really cartoonish, if not downright ridiculous.

    Replies: @A123

    Are you in movie business maybe…?

    No… But I am a sci-fi geek all the way back to my youth. Which means that I have a personal stake in cherished childhood icons being trashed.

    where this idea of making movies from comic books about superheros IN SUCH A QUANTITY came from

    The Marvel Cinematic Universe [MCU] was like printing money culminating in Phase III with Avengers: Infinity War & Endgame. This wrapped the stories for several current actors/characters.

    The normal comic book process would be a like-for-like replacement with subtle tweaks to open new stories. Instead, things went off a cliff

    • The CCP’s WUHAN -19 virus got loose.
    • The “streaming wars” needed content.
    • Supervision became lax
    • Activists with Trump Derangement Syndrome [TDS] were triggered

    The need for shorter, serial releases was in flight at the time that Phase IV launched. This became vulnerable to The Message and the M-SHE-U “bait & switch” was launched:

    ▫ Wanda Vision
    ▫ She Hulk
    ▫ Ms. Marvel
    ▫ Kate Bishop (a.k.a. Hawkeye)
    ▫ Sylvie (a.k.a. Loki)

    Then put the Phase IV movies on top of this.

     

     

    • Eternals was aggressively multicultural (and made no sense)
    • America Chavez (a.k.a. Dr. Strange II) was hijacked by Stronger Female Lead
    • Love & Thunder = Written by Taika Waititi

    Houston, The Sheer F*cking Hubris has landed. Its not just the quantity… Its all bad.
    ____

    Marvel and Star Wars are in the same boat. So much damage has been done to the IP. They need to get rid of Kathleen Kennedy and perform some type of reboot and/or sale.

    Spielberg ruthlessly & publicly trampled KK.

    So there are tiny slivers of almost hope. However, even if changes are made today there are still almost 2 years of unwatchable dreck in the production pipeline.

    PEACE 😇

    • Replies: @QCIC
    @A123

    It used to be 50% story and 50% propaganda.

    Now it is 5% story and 95% propaganda.

    Find a good book, but don't kid yourself about the propaganda in printed works.

  350. @S
    @Greasy William


    This isn’t the US of the 1940’s, though. Pretty much nobody would agree to be drafted.
     
    True, the world is not the same as it was in 1940. I think WWIII would quickly go nuclear.

    Replies: @Greasy William

    The Vilna Gaon said that the war of Gog and Magog would only last 12 minutes

    • Thanks: S
  351. @Beckow
    @Ivashka the fool

    I agree with 3) and 4)...the other points are speculations. I also agree that Prigo is a 'hired man', that's what I meant.

    The main impact of this bizarre probably mostly staged event is to strengthen the support of the massive majority in Russia (80-90%) for the moderate Putin gment. And to rattle the West that "shit can hit the fan very easily".

    But it wasn't a "coup" - it simply mathematically doesn't add up in a country of 150 million people, maybe a "mini-coup", but those are not meant to succeed. There was literally zero chance that it would go to Moscow. The crowds supporting it (but it is very hard to judge) will push the gment to a more assertive stance - in that way it was possibly also stage-managed ("see, people want more blood! lets give it to them")

    Russia is signaling that time to make a deal will soon end and the moderate methods may also end. That means more instability, more volatility. But if the West is blind to the best possible - and actually available - outcome, what else would we expect?

    Replies: @QCIC, @AP, @Yevardian

    Scott Ritter claimed Ukrainian teams were caught preparing sabotage in Moscow as part of this. Has this been confirmed?

    Of course, this might be the kind of information the Russians would release to make the fake coup more believable, like shooting down the helicopter. However, it directly links Prigozhin to the Ukrainians which is a different very treasonous narrative. Alternatively, the Ukrainians could have fabricated this information to muddy the water.

    If the Ukrainians were actually there and preparing for a very serious provocation, it might be a reasonable explanation for why the government would actually stage such a coup. Maybe the coup gives some trigger for extraordinary FSB actions or something like that.

    If this simply blows over with no sensible explanation, something like a Western-Ukie terror attack might be a good theory. Of course if Putin is as wise as some believe, most of Ivashka’s view could still come to pass, with the Kremlin following the mantra of “let no crisis go to waste”.

  352. @LatW
    From Ivan Yakovina (an interesting political commentator who has fled Russia to Ukraine) on what Putin may have offered Prigo.

    Yakovina is alluding to a group of high level officials who have been gathering around Dyumin in Tula, including people such as Sechin, FSB generals, oligarchs (I mentioned this group in the previous threads when speaking about who may be behind Prigo). Before this attempted "takeover" these were supposedly Prigo's allies. So Dyumin could've served as the guarantor (and mediator) between Putin and Prigo.

    Yakovina's version:

    Prigo backed down only temporarily. His mutiny was not stomped out, they themselves left. Prigo has had demands towards the Russian government for a long time now (bordering on blackmail). So far he received most of the things he asked, he would go quiet but then demands would grow again. Prigo may have offered Putin that he would not capture Kremlin, if he fulfills his demands - his people in the MOD, removal of Shoigu and Gerasimov. This would allow Prigo to control all of the Russian army + his own military company, so he would have all the power and would have nothing to fear (including from the FSB). Possibly asked for resources, money, etc. If Putin agreed to this, most likely the top of the MOD will change. If that doesn't happen, then Prigo could go back to Moscow (he has the means). Prigo's mutiny was not stomped out, the leaders were not liquidated. Yakovina compares this march to plain, primitive type of racketeering.

    Prigo has said he wants to "protect" Belgorod, he was at first told "no". They gave Belgorod to Kadyrov*, they are looting the local population, there is enough to loot since the oblast is affluent. One of the bargaining chips could've been the transfer of Belgorod in order to create a military base there under Prigo's leadership (a feudal camp similar to what Chechnya is for Kadyrov). The most recent info is that Kadyrovites are leaving Belgorod. If this is true, then this theory might be valid.

    Prigo does not want to sit on the crown, he wants to be a backroom operator. A grey cardinal. It made sense for Putin to give him these things to avert a real takeover.

    In order for things to not look this way, Prigo will get his resources a bit later, not right away. There needs to be a brief pause. To guarantee the deal, Dyumin was brought in. If this version is believable, Prigo will lay low for a while, with his men (somewhere in the steppe). If Putin does not fulfill his end of the deal, the mutiny can come back or at least some violent action. The prikol (the funny or crazy part) is that even if Putin gives Prigo what he wants, the mutiny can still come back, because when a criminal sees that he can demand things and get away with it (лох разводиться - the loser agrees to be blackmailed), he can come back asking for more. Bit by bit, if this continues, Prigo can take over and Putin could become a merely symbolic figure. This is what Prigo wants, according to Yakovina, that Prigo can pull Putin by his strings. In order to avert this scenario, Putin needs to liquidate Prigo and the whole Wagner, but Putin does not have the strength for it. The Russian state is not capable of waging two wars at once - one against Ukraine and another against Wagner and their supporters. Wagner was riding around the country unhindered, downing helicopters.

    What this means for Russia: The military is demoralized. The mega vatniks, z voenkors, are frustrated, dumbfounded how they ended up on the cusp of a civil war. They did not know who to support, Putin or Prigo.

    The armed forces, seeing that Putin fled to Valdai, lost their loyalty to Putin. Bureaucrats fled Moscow to wherever they could. They gain a lot from Putin's system, but not so much that they would deliberately fight and die for it. The population greeted Wagner (!!) where they arrived (see footage from Rostov).

    The functioning of the state institutions is compromised, everything was functioning based on fear. If the Ukrainian military manage to break certain areas of the front, the Wagnerites (or other forces) can keep raiding Russia. 90% of the military are in Ukraine, Rosgvardia are in Moscow. They will flee at the sight of real tanks. The system is fragile and Putin is helpless.

    Hypothetically, the Ukrainian units could enter southern Russia and then re-enter Luhansk and recover their territories there.

    Btw, when you analyze this version from Yakovina, you can start to understand what Prigo may have been sitting for back in the early 1990s.

    * Denis from RDK who was raiding the Belgorod region, acknowledged that the Kadyrovites were put in charge there, and that they are already harassing Russian women. Overall, Belgorod is important, because the Russian freedom fighters had the intention of creating a buffer zone there for Ukraine. Maybe they shouldn't have been so vocal about it, as now the Russian state will finally and act and maybe put someone capable in charge there. It is interesting that both Prigo / Wagner and RDK / Legion of Freedom of Russia were vying for this oblast. But they have not yet colluded or maybe even were never meant to collude (as they are on opposite sides of the barricades, even if they do share the political niche to some extent, there is a very slight overlap there).

    In Russian (starts around 12:00):

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aVleiICqZoM

    Replies: @Beckow, @QCIC, @Wokechoke

    They probably told Prigozhid that they’d publicly call him a Zhid.

    You may call him a swindler and conman a crook, water rolls off a ducks back, but call him a Jew…see how he recoils!

  353. @LondonBob
    @Mr. XYZ

    Eastern Europe imported large numbers of Germans to assist them in economic development, even today ethnic Germans are well represented in the Russian elite.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @Mr. XYZ

    There are also some people of Jewish descent in prominent leadership positions in the ex-USSR countries since the end of the Cold War in spite of their small and rapidly declining share of the total population. Jews also originally came to Eastern Europe from Germany, no? The Ashkenazim, I mean.

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @Mr. XYZ

    It’s likely that these Jews came to Poland after the English and French expelled their own parasitic cluster of Jewish bankers.

  354. @Greasy William
    @A123

    Putin is a power hungry snake. When he sees that taking on Israel is his only hope for continued expansion, he will turn against Israel.

    Although Putin is over 70 and if he leaves power in the next 10 years it will actually be Putin's successor, which I have always thought to be more likely

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @A123

    When he sees that taking on Israel is his only hope for continued expansion, he will turn against Israel.

    Israel has nukes and doesn’t have a common border with Russia like Ukraine has. And Russia’s soft power in Israel has not been completely destroyed like it was in Ukraine.

    • Replies: @Greasy William
    @Mr. XYZ

    Putin has entered into a messianic state of mind. Putin doesn't want to just advance what he sees as Russian interests, he wants to make Russia fully into the 3rd Rome. Putin wants to be the greatest conqueror in history. It is no more possible to appease Putin than it was to appease Hitler. Putin will stop at nothing to conquer Ukraine entirely and then he will move south because there is nothing left for him to go after.

    If you talk to any people actually in Russia, there is an upsurge of patriotism and national pride now that has replaced the apathy and despair of the last 30+ years. There is also a huge and extremely sudden upsurge in antisemitism. Add that to the fact that this is a country that remains economically stagnant and saddled with horrendous demographics with little hope for improvement and you have a nation that is ready for war.

    Replies: @keypusher, @Mr. XYZ

  355. @Dmitry
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms


    “Oriental governmental structure” imply that it’s dictorial is a false premise.

     

    Yes you are repeating what I wrote.

    Russia far more expansionary,

     

    If you excluded the Soviet times, Russia is less more expansionary than USA, Brazil. Less expansionary than USA, as when Cossacks move in the border it's not ideological, but a practical need to move outside of law. The government also has expand over the border zone to secure the areas which are already settled, including from Russian rebels. It's mainly only in the Soviet times when there is really decisions to settle most of this land.

    In postsoviet time, the country is now reducing again, they allow half the country to decay and depopulate, so the model will be some megacities closer to each other in the center. A lot of the problems in Russia, are actually because it's not really expansionary and there isn't interest for investing in more than half of the country or even a lot of the sense they don't want to continue a lot of the country.

    It was only a Soviet time of seventy years when there was ideological justification to be expansionary. While USA had expansionary ideology for over two hundred years now.

    ike alot of self-loathing Chinese ethnics–
     
    Perhaps superficially, but this comment is a sign of ignorance. It's like someone says "HP imports its software". And you will write, "you sound like one of those self-hating developers at Microsoft, who says they don't develop inhouse, because the original Windows was inspired by Xerox".

    To compare to China in this topic, is one of the most bizarre comparisons. China develops culture inhouse for thousands of years. In Russia, the culture and operating systems are imported for a thousand years, if you include ancestor states of Russia.

    There is also a native Russia culture the modifications to the imported culture, however I don't anyone here understands enough about the culture, at least in relation to Europe to discuss this.

    I tried to talk about Rachmaninov to Bashibuzuk a few times, but he will just disappear if the discussion becomes a serious one, which is not something Soviet.

    geo-historical reasons for this, both northern China and Russia lie on flat terrains so prone to invasions.

     

    You couldn't compare two different countries, of China and Russia, which are more different in terms of the cultural autonomy or independence. China is an example of culture manufacturer, old center, while Russia is culture importer and slave colony model.

    China and Russia are one of the most different countries in this area. This topic has no relation to "flat terrains so prone to invasions." Russia, Brazil and USA have defeated invasions for a lot longer than inhouse culture producer countries like France or Germany.

    Prigozhin boasted about marching to Moscow in x hours, you can only do that because there’s not an Alps or English Channel in between.

     

    It seems like you are writing a muddled comment, with no relation to the topic. The reason? Because you want to talk about China and are not interested about learning about Russia.

    "Wagner" was internal conflict of elites, with a popular group, while the army is in Ukraine. It's not related to the flat terrain in Russia. The military doesn't shoot against Wagner.

    You can't invade Russia from Poland like this as there is the Russian army. Also, Russia has the world's largest number of nuclear weapons. If there is any country which you wouldn't invade. This part of the reason Putin can behave aggressively with the postsoviet border conflict in Ukraine, because he knows there is no threat of invasion from the external countries including China.

    incubation for high-end niche industries availing scientific investments. Germany cannot

     

    I'm not writing anywhere about scaling Switzerland. But the comments about scaling are about countries/territory with the English systems as a result of the information transfer in the late British empire, Bermuda, Hong Kong, Singapore, Israel, Australia, New Zealand, Australia.

    Generally, the countries with smaller populations are working better, so sure there will be at some time reduction of results with scaling.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    While USA had expansionary ideology for over two hundred years now.

    The US’s territorial expansions have largely ended over a century ago:

    The last territorial acquisition on this map that I see is the Danish West Indies, acquired in 1917, 106 years ago. We would have acquired them even sooner, specifically back in 1902, had this sale gotten just one more vote in the upper house (Landsting/Landsthing) of the Danish parliament (Riksdag) back then.

  356. A123 says: • Website
    @Greasy William
    @A123

    Putin is a power hungry snake. When he sees that taking on Israel is his only hope for continued expansion, he will turn against Israel.

    Although Putin is over 70 and if he leaves power in the next 10 years it will actually be Putin's successor, which I have always thought to be more likely

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @A123

    Putin is a power hungry snake. When he sees that taking on Israel is his only hope for continued expansion, he will turn against Israel.

    Absorbing the territory based on current lines would be challenging for Russia’s economy. The idea that Putin wants unlimited expansion does not hold up to scruitiny.

    Assuming that you are right, why would Putin not ask his buddy Netanyahu to help? There is zero need to “take on Israel”. Lebanon becoming a Russian client state would improve the security of Palestinian Jews.

    PEACE 😇

    • Replies: @Greasy William
    @A123

    Because. he. is. out. of. his. mind.

    Putin doesn't care about "Russian interests" anymore. Like Hitler, he wants global dominion. Just like Hitler instinctively understood that only the destruction of the Jews would allow for German world dominance, Putin likewise instinctively understands that only the conquest of Eretz Yisrael will make him the modern day Caesar that he wants to be.

    As a Jew, you should know that everything that happens in the physical is just a manifestation of what happens in the spiritual. Once you understand that, everything else becomes clear

    Replies: @A123, @Wokechoke

  357. @A123
    @Another Polish Perspective


    Are you in movie business maybe…?
     
    No... But I am a sci-fi geek all the way back to my youth. Which means that I have a personal stake in cherished childhood icons being trashed.

    where this idea of making movies from comic books about superheros IN SUCH A QUANTITY came from
     
    The Marvel Cinematic Universe [MCU] was like printing money culminating in Phase III with Avengers: Infinity War & Endgame. This wrapped the stories for several current actors/characters.

    The normal comic book process would be a like-for-like replacement with subtle tweaks to open new stories. Instead, things went off a cliff

    • The CCP's WUHAN -19 virus got loose.
    • The "streaming wars" needed content.
    • Supervision became lax
    • Activists with Trump Derangement Syndrome [TDS] were triggered

    The need for shorter, serial releases was in flight at the time that Phase IV launched. This became vulnerable to The Message and the M-SHE-U "bait & switch" was launched:

    ▫ Wanda Vision
    ▫ She Hulk
    ▫ Ms. Marvel
    ▫ Kate Bishop (a.k.a. Hawkeye)
    ▫ Sylvie (a.k.a. Loki)

    Then put the Phase IV movies on top of this.

     
    https://i.pinimg.com/originals/4c/b8/0f/4cb80f9b2da6f06c06a389741b81bc9d.jpg
     

    • Eternals was aggressively multicultural (and made no sense)
    • America Chavez (a.k.a. Dr. Strange II) was hijacked by Stronger Female Lead
    • Love & Thunder = Written by Taika Waititi

    Houston, The Sheer F*cking Hubris has landed. Its not just the quantity... Its all bad.
    ____

    Marvel and Star Wars are in the same boat. So much damage has been done to the IP. They need to get rid of Kathleen Kennedy and perform some type of reboot and/or sale.

    Spielberg ruthlessly & publicly trampled KK.

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=NVqhTnjZZHc

    So there are tiny slivers of almost hope. However, even if changes are made today there are still almost 2 years of unwatchable dreck in the production pipeline.

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @QCIC

    It used to be 50% story and 50% propaganda.

    Now it is 5% story and 95% propaganda.

    Find a good book, but don’t kid yourself about the propaganda in printed works.

  358. @Dmitry
    @Sean

    There is a different situation in the last 20 years, as large part of the elites in Russia have exited from living in Russia mostly around 2005-2015.

    There was the emigration of the elites mostly after around 2005, while some are still managing Russia, there are also their property and assets outside Russia.

    I feel most of educated internal discussion in Russia are middle class people, who are quite "rooted" (i.e. "trapped") in Russia. In last decade, liberal ideology in Russia is usually practical, boring and sensible for improving life, related to improving power of the ordinary people, urbanism (cleaning streets etc), reducing open borders immigration, improving the external relations with the powerful countries etc. It has also reduced influence with the authorities though and it's less elite than the liberalism in the past.

    Replies: @Sean

    There was the emigration of the elites mostly after around 2005, while some are still managing Russia, there are also their property and assets outside Russia.

    Putin’s SMO really stuck it to them, they are now under very close scutiny and politicians in the West back away from them for fear of being tagged as taking money from Russian oligarchs; while capital flight elite money may be safe from Putin in the West it is now very vulnerable to expropriatory taxes by the West. Russia has money in the West but if it is touched the Chinese would take all their own away out of fear it could be grabbed in some future political crisis.

    Russia is an odd country. I have read that uniquely the age of mothers fell in it for decades. Meanwhile in the West and everywhere else comparable, women had their first child at older and older ages

    • Replies: @Dmitry
    @Sean


    very vulnerable to expropriatory taxes by the West.

     

    Well, the situation is not as bad as they describe in the media. Sanctions against Russians outside Russia, are still very limited. Also, a large part of Russian elite have additional citizenships, their money was always in the West and avoid these problems. It's really Russian upper middle class, which has less resources to manage the situation.

    I would say, the easy answer to these problems, is to become a good immigrant, who assimilates to the Western countries.

    . I have read that uniquely the age of mothers fell in it for decades. Meanwhile in the West and everywhere else comparable, women had their first child at older and older ages
     
    The age of first childbirth was falling in the 1990s, while fertility rate was also falling.

    This is why the discussions of these forums where people are worried about fertility rates and say "women have children earlier" are not very realistic.

    Postsoviet countries have low age of first childbirth and low fertility rate. For comparison, Israel has very high age of first childbirth and higher fertility rate.

    Also, if fertility rate is below replacement, then the earlier childbirth will increases the speed of the population decline, because it reduces the distance between generations.

    If the cycle of generations is happening faster at below replacement rate, then population will later age at a comparatively faster rate – once those born in below replacement cohorts pass median age of the population, than if those same generations were cycled more slowly.

    If at this subreplacement rate, tempo effect (postpone of birth to an older age), will result in a significantly larger total population size in the future.

    -

    In Europe the situation is sub-replacement fertility with rising ages of women having children. The latter means that the effect of the sub-replacement fertility on the eventual population is lower, than if women were having children younger with sub-replacement fertility.

    Replies: @Sean

  359. AP says:
    @Beckow
    @Ivashka the fool

    I agree with 3) and 4)...the other points are speculations. I also agree that Prigo is a 'hired man', that's what I meant.

    The main impact of this bizarre probably mostly staged event is to strengthen the support of the massive majority in Russia (80-90%) for the moderate Putin gment. And to rattle the West that "shit can hit the fan very easily".

    But it wasn't a "coup" - it simply mathematically doesn't add up in a country of 150 million people, maybe a "mini-coup", but those are not meant to succeed. There was literally zero chance that it would go to Moscow. The crowds supporting it (but it is very hard to judge) will push the gment to a more assertive stance - in that way it was possibly also stage-managed ("see, people want more blood! lets give it to them")

    Russia is signaling that time to make a deal will soon end and the moderate methods may also end. That means more instability, more volatility. But if the West is blind to the best possible - and actually available - outcome, what else would we expect?

    Replies: @QCIC, @AP, @Yevardian

    The main impact of this bizarre probably mostly staged event is to strengthen the support of the massive majority in Russia (80-90%) for the moderate Putin gment. And to rattle the West that “shit can hit the fan very easily“.

    You are wrong as usual. Wagner is more popular than Putin’s government among ordinary Russians.

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @AP

    Wagner is popular among the "deep people" - hinterland types and probably with those who did time, which is a substantial demographic stratum in the male RF population. Basically, among those who would listen to blatnyak chanson, which I also sometimes do for the old times'sake:

    BTW, that's a fitting song about either Prigozhin and/or Putin's behavior at the conclusion of yesterday's events :

    https://youtu.be/MwKEEH66i3Q

    (Not sure you would appreciate the subtle political irony of my musical choice though, it's too idiosyncratic...)

    🙂

  360. @Mr. XYZ
    @Greasy William


    When he sees that taking on Israel is his only hope for continued expansion, he will turn against Israel.
     
    Israel has nukes and doesn't have a common border with Russia like Ukraine has. And Russia's soft power in Israel has not been completely destroyed like it was in Ukraine.

    Replies: @Greasy William

    Putin has entered into a messianic state of mind. Putin doesn’t want to just advance what he sees as Russian interests, he wants to make Russia fully into the 3rd Rome. Putin wants to be the greatest conqueror in history. It is no more possible to appease Putin than it was to appease Hitler. Putin will stop at nothing to conquer Ukraine entirely and then he will move south because there is nothing left for him to go after.

    If you talk to any people actually in Russia, there is an upsurge of patriotism and national pride now that has replaced the apathy and despair of the last 30+ years. There is also a huge and extremely sudden upsurge in antisemitism. Add that to the fact that this is a country that remains economically stagnant and saddled with horrendous demographics with little hope for improvement and you have a nation that is ready for war.

    • Replies: @keypusher
    @Greasy William


    Putin will stop at nothing to conquer Ukraine entirely and then he will move south because there is nothing left for him to go after.
     
    He can't even get to Kharkov.
    , @Mr. XYZ
    @Greasy William

    Russians would be better off channeling their energies into breeding more. Russia could invest in large suburban house construction as a part of this process. I consider breeding more and getting more immigration to be more ethical ways of getting extra human capital relative to conquering unwilling people. Russia could still have greatness ahead for it, eventually, similar to how the US found true greatness decades after it failed to conquer Canada back in 1812.

    As for the anti-Semitism, if the anti-Semitism in Russia will get out of control, then Israel should get a lot of new immigrants, which would be great for Israel, other than for the Ultra-Orthodox, who don't like Russians, especially if they're not halakhically Jewish.

    Replies: @Greasy William

  361. @A123
    @Greasy William


    Putin is a power hungry snake. When he sees that taking on Israel is his only hope for continued expansion, he will turn against Israel.
     
    Absorbing the territory based on current lines would be challenging for Russia's economy. The idea that Putin wants unlimited expansion does not hold up to scruitiny.

    Assuming that you are right, why would Putin not ask his buddy Netanyahu to help? There is zero need to "take on Israel". Lebanon becoming a Russian client state would improve the security of Palestinian Jews.

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @Greasy William

    Because. he. is. out. of. his. mind.

    Putin doesn’t care about “Russian interests” anymore. Like Hitler, he wants global dominion. Just like Hitler instinctively understood that only the destruction of the Jews would allow for German world dominance, Putin likewise instinctively understands that only the conquest of Eretz Yisrael will make him the modern day Caesar that he wants to be.

    As a Jew, you should know that everything that happens in the physical is just a manifestation of what happens in the spiritual. Once you understand that, everything else becomes clear

    • Replies: @A123
    @Greasy William

    As a Christian I understand what Jesus allows me to see.


    Putin doesn’t care about “Russian interests” anymore. Like Hitler, he wants global dominion.
     
    Evidence is 100% against this. Putin has deliberately left Ukrainian infrastructure intact. His end game is to avoid having a failed state on Russia's border.

    conquest of Eretz Yisrael will make him the modern day Caesar that he wants to be.
     
    You need to wind back on your drug intake. No one with a clear mind has tried to foist gibberish like Eretz Yisrael on people for decades.

    Are you having LSD flashbacks? Weight loss can trigger the release of fat solvent chemicals.

    PEACE 😇
    , @Wokechoke
    @Greasy William

    In a sense, that is correct. It took the German’s twenty years to recover their confidence after 1918. It took the Russians 30 after 1990.

  362. @Sean
    @Dmitry


    There was the emigration of the elites mostly after around 2005, while some are still managing Russia, there are also their property and assets outside Russia.
     
    Putin's SMO really stuck it to them, they are now under very close scutiny and politicians in the West back away from them for fear of being tagged as taking money from Russian oligarchs; while capital flight elite money may be safe from Putin in the West it is now very vulnerable to expropriatory taxes by the West. Russia has money in the West but if it is touched the Chinese would take all their own away out of fear it could be grabbed in some future political crisis.

    Russia is an odd country. I have read that uniquely the age of mothers fell in it for decades. Meanwhile in the West and everywhere else comparable, women had their first child at older and older ages

    Replies: @Dmitry

    very vulnerable to expropriatory taxes by the West.

    Well, the situation is not as bad as they describe in the media. Sanctions against Russians outside Russia, are still very limited. Also, a large part of Russian elite have additional citizenships, their money was always in the West and avoid these problems. It’s really Russian upper middle class, which has less resources to manage the situation.

    I would say, the easy answer to these problems, is to become a good immigrant, who assimilates to the Western countries.

    . I have read that uniquely the age of mothers fell in it for decades. Meanwhile in the West and everywhere else comparable, women had their first child at older and older ages

    The age of first childbirth was falling in the 1990s, while fertility rate was also falling.

    This is why the discussions of these forums where people are worried about fertility rates and say “women have children earlier” are not very realistic.

    Postsoviet countries have low age of first childbirth and low fertility rate. For comparison, Israel has very high age of first childbirth and higher fertility rate.

    Also, if fertility rate is below replacement, then the earlier childbirth will increases the speed of the population decline, because it reduces the distance between generations.

    If the cycle of generations is happening faster at below replacement rate, then population will later age at a comparatively faster rate – once those born in below replacement cohorts pass median age of the population, than if those same generations were cycled more slowly.

    If at this subreplacement rate, tempo effect (postpone of birth to an older age), will result in a significantly larger total population size in the future.

    In Europe the situation is sub-replacement fertility with rising ages of women having children. The latter means that the effect of the sub-replacement fertility on the eventual population is lower, than if women were having children younger with sub-replacement fertility.

    • Replies: @Sean
    @Dmitry


    Well, the situation is not as bad as they describe in the media. Sanctions against Russians outside Russia, are still very limited. Also, a large part of Russian elite have additional citizenships, their money was always in the West and avoid these problems. It’s really Russian upper middle class, which has less resources to manage the situation.

    I would say, the easy answer to these problems, is to become a good immigrant, who assimilates to the Western countries.
     
    Russian émigré super rich are going to be in a West that is looking for more taxes from all the super rich even the Western ones and every one else. Previously higher taxes were avoided by raiding the defence budget to pay for inexorably rising social spending (Britain has done this to an extreme), but the SMO has put an end to that.
  363. AP says:
    @Ivashka the fool
    @AP

    Problem is, in their current state, either RusFed or Ukrostan are absolutely unworthy of dying for their preservation. If there was a manner through this valiant and heroic fighting and dying to reform both these ugly mutant states towards their full potential, then it would probably worth it, but there isn't.

    Yesterday, Dyumin and his Wagnerite buddies did more in 24 hours to change history than those who died at Bakhmut in all these months of fighting.

    As the saying goes: work smart, not hard.

    Replies: @AP

    Problem is, in their current state, either RusFed or Ukrostan are absolutely unworthy of dying for their preservation

    Again, it’s not even really about the preservation of the state or the leaders but about fighting against foreign invaders and occupiers. That’s why those 16 year old heroes did what they did.

    If China invaded and occupied parts of Russia would you denigrate the sacrifice of those who resist by saying “RusFed is unworthy of dying for?”

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @AP


    If China invaded and occupied parts of Russia would you denigrate the sacrifice of those who resist by saying “RusFed is unworthy of dying for?”
     
    It depends, if they took back Manchuria / Primoskyi Kray, I wouldn't care. It was theirs for much longer than it was Russian. Same about Japan taking back the Kuriles, although not Sakhalin, which was settled by Russians before the Japanese invaded.

    OTOH, if Balts and or Finns invaded Saint-Petersburg, that would be another story, or if Poles and Lithuanians moved against Smolensk. But I wouldn't care about Germans taking back Kaliningrad, it's actually theirs.

    You see, it's not borders that are important, but historical justice. If people have roots somewhere, they should have rights there. That's what Ukrainian nationalists don't seem to get because they think according to international regulations and not according to понятия. If they were more balanced, they'd have given Russians enough rights in Ukraine, and all this story would be moot and there would be no war. But they were too insecure, which is understandable for people who had never really governed their own affairs, and actually still don't do.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @AP

    , @Anatoly Karlin
    @AP


    If China invaded and occupied parts of Russia would you denigrate the sacrifice of those who resist by saying “RusFed is unworthy of dying for?”
     
    Yes, I would. Under almost any such scenario, the background is that Russia became a lapdog for American neocons, e.g. in the event that Khodorkovsky types and/or White Rex take over post-Putin. Under such conditions, it would not be unreasonable for the Chinese to intervene to contain the threat.

    In light of the above, I would not want Russians to spill their blood for American neocon interests and would consider those who think otherwise to be naive idiots at best, in light of the population and GDP differential between RF and China; and I would consider those Russian leaders and activists who try to force Russians who disagree to sacrifice themselves (e.g. through conscription and border closures) to be degenerates deserving of summary extermination, and would have no compunctions about reporting their coordinates to the PLA in order to accelerate the end of the conflict.

    The optimal strategy overall would be surrender ASAP and let the W*stoids and Chinese duke it out for world hegemony. Flip sides to whoever's winning near the end.

    Replies: @silviosilver, @Yahya, @Mr. XYZ

  364. @Beckow
    @Ivashka the fool

    I agree with 3) and 4)...the other points are speculations. I also agree that Prigo is a 'hired man', that's what I meant.

    The main impact of this bizarre probably mostly staged event is to strengthen the support of the massive majority in Russia (80-90%) for the moderate Putin gment. And to rattle the West that "shit can hit the fan very easily".

    But it wasn't a "coup" - it simply mathematically doesn't add up in a country of 150 million people, maybe a "mini-coup", but those are not meant to succeed. There was literally zero chance that it would go to Moscow. The crowds supporting it (but it is very hard to judge) will push the gment to a more assertive stance - in that way it was possibly also stage-managed ("see, people want more blood! lets give it to them")

    Russia is signaling that time to make a deal will soon end and the moderate methods may also end. That means more instability, more volatility. But if the West is blind to the best possible - and actually available - outcome, what else would we expect?

    Replies: @QCIC, @AP, @Yevardian

    The very public ovation Wagner received whilst leaving Rostov seems to imply otherwise.

    No defender of Prigozhin here, but Shoigu is worse.

    • Replies: @Beckow
    @Yevardian

    The small ovation suggests more-nationalist sympathies than the current Putin's policies - if anything, it was a scream to go bloody-all-the-way...

    How does that hurt Putin when he is fighting a war? It also reaffirms the Russian normies' sense that Putin represents the moderate option - maybe 80-90% of the population. Being between pro-Nato liberals and the fuming, hot-headed nationalists is not a bad place when fighting a war. I suspect it was stage-managed, or at least encouraged and tolerated by Kremlin.

    AK has climbed up somewhere where the liberals and the radical always frustrated nationalists meet, a lonely place quite appropriate for a libertarian-leaning non-family eternal outsider. Or should I say, descended down there...it is an irrelevant place.

    Replies: @QCIC

    , @Gerard1234
    @Yevardian


    The very public ovation Wagner received whilst leaving Rostov seems to imply otherwise.

    No defender of Prigozhin here, but Shoigu is worse.

     

    Shoigu is one of the most competent people on the planet. Seriously brilliant guy. TWO government departments he has greatly and perceptibly improved.

    The public ovation was after the whole issue was resolved/people on saturday night happy they can go to the bars/nightclubs etc now. So, of course the Wagner fighters were applauded with all the heroic acts they have done in the last year as with all Russian military. Plus, without any actual dead people on the streets, people just like the excitement and fame of the situation.

    Assuming that the aircraft downed is false ( even with what Putin has said, and with Wagners assets including many air defence complexes, the idea that a convoy in motion is going to have downed that many, and such a different array of planes/helicopters - with no sane explanation of why 3 of those types of aircraft would even be in that situation, and suffered no sucessful strikes on themselves......is deranged) or that the civilians there were not aware of it - then why wouldn't they cheer heroic patriots of Russia? Nothing suggesting they are going to applaud Wagner and start being against the regular Russian military. Nobody wants a former hero turned traitor situation as with ROA/Vlasov. Now that the guys have resolved the situation, of course the people on the streets are applauding.

    This was all over an administrative issue, that had de facto been decided or resolved with Wagner fighters majority perfectly OK with being directly under MOD. At best it appears this was pitiful attempt by Prigozhin to change this de facto reality.

    Situation resolved.


    As for the Etruscan stuff ( thanks for your comment), not that I necessarily believe it , but several Russian historians ( ok, several of them just amatuers) have claimed it. Some saying they are from Russian steppe, others that they went from Italy to northern Russia/Baltics/Finland. Not a majority at all of historians but some....but if you take 10 different historians from around the world there seems to be about 10 different opinions of where Etruscans came from or went to after. Numerous words from their language are supposed to have filtrated into slavic. My point was mainly about ridiculing these Baltic TsIPSO retards for plaigirising the Etruscan theory as their own, and even trying to use it to make a positive PR BS on Baltics biggest disaster since 1991. That, and the ludicrous level of claiming they were Baltics and Ukrops....but not Russian.
  365. @AP
    @Beckow


    The main impact of this bizarre probably mostly staged event is to strengthen the support of the massive majority in Russia (80-90%) for the moderate Putin gment. And to rattle the West that “shit can hit the fan very easily“.
     
    You are wrong as usual. Wagner is more popular than Putin’s government among ordinary Russians.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

    Wagner is popular among the “deep people” – hinterland types and probably with those who did time, which is a substantial demographic stratum in the male RF population. Basically, among those who would listen to blatnyak chanson, which I also sometimes do for the old times’sake:

    BTW, that’s a fitting song about either Prigozhin and/or Putin’s behavior at the conclusion of yesterday’s events :

    (Not sure you would appreciate the subtle political irony of my musical choice though, it’s too idiosyncratic…)

    🙂

  366. A123 says: • Website
    @Greasy William
    @A123

    Because. he. is. out. of. his. mind.

    Putin doesn't care about "Russian interests" anymore. Like Hitler, he wants global dominion. Just like Hitler instinctively understood that only the destruction of the Jews would allow for German world dominance, Putin likewise instinctively understands that only the conquest of Eretz Yisrael will make him the modern day Caesar that he wants to be.

    As a Jew, you should know that everything that happens in the physical is just a manifestation of what happens in the spiritual. Once you understand that, everything else becomes clear

    Replies: @A123, @Wokechoke

    As a Christian I understand what Jesus allows me to see.

    Putin doesn’t care about “Russian interests” anymore. Like Hitler, he wants global dominion.

    Evidence is 100% against this. Putin has deliberately left Ukrainian infrastructure intact. His end game is to avoid having a failed state on Russia’s border.

    conquest of Eretz Yisrael will make him the modern day Caesar that he wants to be.

    You need to wind back on your drug intake. No one with a clear mind has tried to foist gibberish like Eretz Yisrael on people for decades.

    Are you having LSD flashbacks? Weight loss can trigger the release of fat solvent chemicals.

    PEACE 😇

  367. @Greasy William
    @A123

    Because. he. is. out. of. his. mind.

    Putin doesn't care about "Russian interests" anymore. Like Hitler, he wants global dominion. Just like Hitler instinctively understood that only the destruction of the Jews would allow for German world dominance, Putin likewise instinctively understands that only the conquest of Eretz Yisrael will make him the modern day Caesar that he wants to be.

    As a Jew, you should know that everything that happens in the physical is just a manifestation of what happens in the spiritual. Once you understand that, everything else becomes clear

    Replies: @A123, @Wokechoke

    In a sense, that is correct. It took the German’s twenty years to recover their confidence after 1918. It took the Russians 30 after 1990.

  368. @Mr. XYZ
    @LondonBob

    There are also some people of Jewish descent in prominent leadership positions in the ex-USSR countries since the end of the Cold War in spite of their small and rapidly declining share of the total population. Jews also originally came to Eastern Europe from Germany, no? The Ashkenazim, I mean.

    Replies: @Wokechoke

    It’s likely that these Jews came to Poland after the English and French expelled their own parasitic cluster of Jewish bankers.

  369. @AP
    @Ivashka the fool


    Problem is, in their current state, either RusFed or Ukrostan are absolutely unworthy of dying for their preservation
     
    Again, it’s not even really about the preservation of the state or the leaders but about fighting against foreign invaders and occupiers. That’s why those 16 year old heroes did what they did.

    If China invaded and occupied parts of Russia would you denigrate the sacrifice of those who resist by saying “RusFed is unworthy of dying for?”

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Anatoly Karlin

    If China invaded and occupied parts of Russia would you denigrate the sacrifice of those who resist by saying “RusFed is unworthy of dying for?”

    It depends, if they took back Manchuria / Primoskyi Kray, I wouldn’t care. It was theirs for much longer than it was Russian. Same about Japan taking back the Kuriles, although not Sakhalin, which was settled by Russians before the Japanese invaded.

    OTOH, if Balts and or Finns invaded Saint-Petersburg, that would be another story, or if Poles and Lithuanians moved against Smolensk. But I wouldn’t care about Germans taking back Kaliningrad, it’s actually theirs.

    You see, it’s not borders that are important, but historical justice. If people have roots somewhere, they should have rights there. That’s what Ukrainian nationalists don’t seem to get because they think according to international regulations and not according to понятия. If they were more balanced, they’d have given Russians enough rights in Ukraine, and all this story would be moot and there would be no war. But they were too insecure, which is understandable for people who had never really governed their own affairs, and actually still don’t do.

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @Ivashka the fool

    Look at this for example.

    Two groups of basically well meaning people. Patriotards waving flags and Altright flavoured college boys…

    https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1672981094902185986?s=20


    The flag wavers think the guys in black are FEDs. Twitter poster truly thinks the right had a win win here. Trust the plan I guess.

    This is why the US is hopeless. Slava USA! The flagwavers cringe.

    Putin did in fact just banish a Jewish usurper. He may not have even wished to do so either and probably didn’t expect it. But he did.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

    , @AP
    @Ivashka the fool


    It depends, if they took back Manchuria / Primoskyi Kray, I wouldn’t care. It was theirs for much longer than it was Russian. Same about Japan taking back the Kuriles, although not Sakhalin, which was settled by Russians before the Japanese invaded.
     
    How about Crimea? Didn't have a Russian majority until the Tatars were expelled after World War II.

    You see, it’s not borders that are important, but historical justice. If people have roots somewhere, they should have rights there. That’s what Ukrainian nationalists don’t seem to get because they think according to international regulations and not according to понятия.
     
    The problem is that the areas Ukrainians and Russians are fighting over didn't have longstanding roots from either nation. All there is: percentage of each group, and international borders. Crimea and urban Donbas are Ukrainian by international borders but not by majority population, the lands controlled by Kiev prior to February 2022 were both Ukrainian by international borders and by majority population. As for history - those lands (not Crimea, but pre-2022 Ukraine) were majority Ukrainian by 1897 too. Difference was that cities (small back then) were Russian, countryside was Ukrainian while provinces as a whole were Ukrainian. When the cities grew due to an influx of surrounding villagers, they achieved Ukrainian majorities.

    So Russians have no legitimate claims upon Ukraine in the 2014-2022 borders. Zaporizhia isn't Ukrainian like Kalinigrad is Russian.

    Replies: @Mikhail, @LatW, @Ivashka the fool

  370. The SMO has went from one extreme to another, first an attempted coup de main to conquer a huge country within a week, then a snail’s pace brad advance that cannot be decisive before Ukraine gets all sorts of Western weapons, possibly even a Western army being built up by countries like Poland.

    Markus Reisner, Colonel Austrian Armed Forces : “The Americans … always provide the Ukrainians with just enough to defend themselves. But not much more, either. And that’s the key thing: the U.S. is not cornering the Russians, because it wants to avoid escalation.”

    Yevgeny Prigozhin’s argument with Sergei Shoigu seems to be partly strategic and must be in agreement with an increasing number of Russian regular army generals privately thinking that aging civilian defence minister Shoigu is telling Putin what he wants to hear (everything is going swimmingly) while the war dragging on erodes Russia’s relative advantages. Prigozhin is surely not the only one who thinks it is now urgent force to a decision instead of acting like Russia has all the time in the world–the West is gearing up.

    Wagner is close to being in position for a Thunder Run to Kiev now. If the Kremlin decides that a change of strategy to an operation with the goal of final victory in the foreseeable future is now required, then an all out assault on the Ukrainian capital would fit the bill.

    • Replies: @Greasy William
    @Sean

    The Russian military is growing stronger and the Ukrainian military is growing weaker. There does not appear to be any prospect in the foreseeable future of Ukraine breaking through Russian lines. Absent direct US intervention, Russia can continue its slow grind strategy indefinitely.

    Replies: @Sean

    , @Wokechoke
    @Sean

    This is definitely not the case. Every one of these generals is keen to emulate Pierce Edmond De Lacy, Suverov, Potemkin, Kutusov to keep Crimea and Donbas.

    Replies: @Sean

  371. Military mutinies in Russia historically can be divided into two groups.

    1) Ideologically aimed at “tightening the screws” and “strengthening power.” Examples are the State Emergency Committee in 1991, the Kornilov rebellion in 1917.

    2) Ideologically aimed at “freedom”, “unscrewing the screws” and the collapse of power. Examples are the February and October revolutions (I remind you that the Bolsheviks, Social Revolutionaries and anarchists in the first months after the VOSR organized by them acted as a destructive force that led to the collapse of power and total anarchy).

    And there is an unpleasant historical pattern: a few months after the failure of the rebellion of the “screwers”, a successful (not necessarily armed) rebellion of the “ruiners of the country” follows. After the defeat of the Kornilov rebellion, the October Revolution came, and after the defeat of the State Emergency Committee, a parade of sovereignties on the outskirts and the collapse of the USSR.

    The reasons for this regularity are clear: in the course of the struggle against the “Kornilovites” and “Gekachepists”, cadres sympathetic to them are purged from power and the “liberda” begins to dominate there.

    “Wagner’s rebellion” in its ideology can be recognized as “Kornilov’s”. If the aforementioned pattern continues, then a few months after its suppression, we should expect a “liberal revolution” with capitulation and the collapse of the country.

    From Kornev’s LJ.

  372. @Ivashka the fool
    @AP


    If China invaded and occupied parts of Russia would you denigrate the sacrifice of those who resist by saying “RusFed is unworthy of dying for?”
     
    It depends, if they took back Manchuria / Primoskyi Kray, I wouldn't care. It was theirs for much longer than it was Russian. Same about Japan taking back the Kuriles, although not Sakhalin, which was settled by Russians before the Japanese invaded.

    OTOH, if Balts and or Finns invaded Saint-Petersburg, that would be another story, or if Poles and Lithuanians moved against Smolensk. But I wouldn't care about Germans taking back Kaliningrad, it's actually theirs.

    You see, it's not borders that are important, but historical justice. If people have roots somewhere, they should have rights there. That's what Ukrainian nationalists don't seem to get because they think according to international regulations and not according to понятия. If they were more balanced, they'd have given Russians enough rights in Ukraine, and all this story would be moot and there would be no war. But they were too insecure, which is understandable for people who had never really governed their own affairs, and actually still don't do.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @AP

    Look at this for example.

    Two groups of basically well meaning people. Patriotards waving flags and Altright flavoured college boys…

    The flag wavers think the guys in black are FEDs. Twitter poster truly thinks the right had a win win here. Trust the plan I guess.

    This is why the US is hopeless. Slava USA! The flagwavers cringe.

    Putin did in fact just banish a Jewish usurper. He may not have even wished to do so either and probably didn’t expect it. But he did.

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @Wokechoke

    Putin's circle is full of people of Jewish descent. Wake me up when he expels the Rothenberg brothers, not that I really count on it ever happening.

  373. AP says:
    @Beckow
    @AP


    ...There’s a difference between fighting the occupiers and being one.
     
    Who is the occupier in Donbas? If the population is Russian, speaks Russian and wants friendship with Russia...are they "occupying" themselves?

    Would you want your relatives to die to make sure that those Russians are expelled, killed or forcefully assimilated? Because that is what Kiev is doing today. In territories that were for hundreds of years majority Russian and only added to Ukraine by the Bolsheviks to put some "workers" into the demographic mix.

    You are trying to find a middle ground by pretending that it is about Kiev or Lviv, but it is not - it is about whether the Russians the Donbas and the southeast have any rights, whether they can exist as themselves. I would remind you that the first law passed after Maidan in February 2014 was to abolish Russian as a regional second language - in a country where half the population are native Russian speakers. And then they murdered 50 Russians in Odessa and Kiev laughed...you still do when you lie about it.

    Replies: @QCIC, @AP

    “There’s a difference between fighting the occupiers and being one.”

    Who is the occupier in Donbas? If the population is Russian, speaks Russian and wants friendship with Russia…are they “occupying” themselves?

    As I said, I oppose invading and occupying places such as Crimea or Donetsk city.

    Zaporizhia is not those areas.

    Would you want your relatives to die to make sure that those Russians are expelled, killed or forcefully assimilated? Because that is what Kiev is doing today

    Kiev is fighting Russian invaders. Those 16 year old boys did not fight to conquer Crimea but died in battle against occupiers of their home.

    In territories that were for hundreds of years majority Russian

    Now you are just back to your usual lying. Crimea was not majority Russian until 1945.

    I would remind you that the first law passed after Maidan in February 2014 was to abolish Russian as a regional second language – in a country where half the population are native Russian speakers

    And a large percentage of those Russian speakers, and majority of Ukraine’s population, supported that. It was repealing a law passed by a fake parliament and unpopular president in 2011. Repealing it returned Ukraine to the status quo of 1991-2011.

    And then they murdered 50 Russians in Odessa

    Repeating your lie again, of course.

    • Replies: @Beckow
    @AP

    Ukie nationalists burnt to death 49 Russians in Odessa in May 2014 - right a at the beginning. A true event that was celebrated by the likes of you and in Kiev. Imagine if the Spanish nationalists burnt to death 50 Catalans and Madrid would celebrate. Imagine what any other country would do. You are right - it was technically only 49. I will give in to you autistic non-defense of a crime.


    Those 16 year old boys did not fight to conquer Crimea but died in battle against occupiers of their home.
     
    They are dying in Donbas and the south-east saying they will go all the way to Crimea-Donbas City. Wars are complicated, but we need to observe them as they are and listen to what people say: Kiev says they will reconquer all Russian speaking territories. The soldiers know it and they know what they are dying for. If Kiev takes Donbas they will they kill-and-expel millions of Russians living there who chose not to a part of Ukraine.

    And a large percentage of those Russian speakers, and majority of Ukraine’s population, supported that.
     
    No they didn't - a few years later 70% of Ukraine voted for Zelko when he promised peace and rights for the Russian speakers. Of course, then he betrayed them.

    It also makes no difference if some members of the Russian minority under pressure of war or out of fear say in public that "we don't need any language rights or schools" - that is irrelevant: in Europe these minority rights are a given.

    If you surveyed the Poles left in Germany in the middle of WW2 they would also noisily claim that "we don't need any Polish rights, we are actually Silesian-Germans", or whatever. Same in Czechia, they even managed to get half a million Czechs to demonstrate the eternal loyalty to Germany after the Heydrich assassination - and the unit wiping out Lidice as a reprisal was led by Czechs who overnight became Germans.

    Wars are like that, people try to survive or ingratiate themselves to the local power.

    Replies: @AP

  374. @Sean
    The SMO has went from one extreme to another, first an attempted coup de main to conquer a huge country within a week, then a snail's pace brad advance that cannot be decisive before Ukraine gets all sorts of Western weapons, possibly even a Western army being built up by countries like Poland.

    Markus Reisner, Colonel Austrian Armed Forces : “The Americans ... always provide the Ukrainians with just enough to defend themselves. But not much more, either. And that’s the key thing: the U.S. is not cornering the Russians, because it wants to avoid escalation.”
     
    Yevgeny Prigozhin's argument with Sergei Shoigu seems to be partly strategic and must be in agreement with an increasing number of Russian regular army generals privately thinking that aging civilian defence minister Shoigu is telling Putin what he wants to hear (everything is going swimmingly) while the war dragging on erodes Russia's relative advantages. Prigozhin is surely not the only one who thinks it is now urgent force to a decision instead of acting like Russia has all the time in the world--the West is gearing up.

    Wagner is close to being in position for a Thunder Run to Kiev now. If the Kremlin decides that a change of strategy to an operation with the goal of final victory in the foreseeable future is now required, then an all out assault on the Ukrainian capital would fit the bill.

    Replies: @Greasy William, @Wokechoke

    The Russian military is growing stronger and the Ukrainian military is growing weaker. There does not appear to be any prospect in the foreseeable future of Ukraine breaking through Russian lines. Absent direct US intervention, Russia can continue its slow grind strategy indefinitely.

    • Replies: @Sean
    @Greasy William


    Absent direct US intervention, Russia can continue its slow grind strategy indefinitely.
     
    "Indefinitely" sums up the mindset of the Kremlin since the opening weeks, but Shoigu is a yes man not a military man and yet he is the advisor Putin relies on. Putin is innately wary of big initiatives but the time has come for them.The Russian's need to re-think their strategy and have a timetabled plan for victory. That will require a decisive operation such as driving for Kiev, because it would have to be defended with all available Ukrainian forces and that will enable Surovikin to ring to battle and destroy the enemy's army. He wants to I am sure, but he is being held back by the Kremlin, who are misinformed about the extent to which the West is comfortable with the current way Russia is waging the war. Russia needs to seize the initiative by amping its effort up and driving for a decisive objective and concomitantly important battle. That will be entail a greater risk than is currently being run, but offers the best chance of final victory.

    Replies: @Greasy William

  375. @Greasy William
    @Mr. XYZ

    Putin has entered into a messianic state of mind. Putin doesn't want to just advance what he sees as Russian interests, he wants to make Russia fully into the 3rd Rome. Putin wants to be the greatest conqueror in history. It is no more possible to appease Putin than it was to appease Hitler. Putin will stop at nothing to conquer Ukraine entirely and then he will move south because there is nothing left for him to go after.

    If you talk to any people actually in Russia, there is an upsurge of patriotism and national pride now that has replaced the apathy and despair of the last 30+ years. There is also a huge and extremely sudden upsurge in antisemitism. Add that to the fact that this is a country that remains economically stagnant and saddled with horrendous demographics with little hope for improvement and you have a nation that is ready for war.

    Replies: @keypusher, @Mr. XYZ

    Putin will stop at nothing to conquer Ukraine entirely and then he will move south because there is nothing left for him to go after.

    He can’t even get to Kharkov.

    • Agree: Ivashka the fool
  376. @Wokechoke
    @Ivashka the fool

    Look at this for example.

    Two groups of basically well meaning people. Patriotards waving flags and Altright flavoured college boys…

    https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1672981094902185986?s=20


    The flag wavers think the guys in black are FEDs. Twitter poster truly thinks the right had a win win here. Trust the plan I guess.

    This is why the US is hopeless. Slava USA! The flagwavers cringe.

    Putin did in fact just banish a Jewish usurper. He may not have even wished to do so either and probably didn’t expect it. But he did.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

    Putin’s circle is full of people of Jewish descent. Wake me up when he expels the Rothenberg brothers, not that I really count on it ever happening.

  377. S says:
    @Beckow
    @S


    ...as is so often the case, I’d rather others (including you) be correct, instead of me.
     
    Don't worry, we are.

    Nothing has changed in the situation: Kiev is cornered and lashing out, Kremlin still likes the Ukie people too much to just kill them, Nato still wants to destroy Russia.

    This will end in one of two ways:
    - Russia wins and decides what the new configuration will be in the region
    - The Kiev and its sponsors manage to escalate too much and we all evaporate...

    In any case, the region will be even poorer than it was, maybe with half the pre-Maidan population, and Zelko with his gang will most likely end up in Florida, bored to death by the subtropical ennui, sending endless alligator pictures to their friends...Mr.Hacks will stay in Phoenix but claim that "it was all worth it..."

    Replies: @S

    …as is so often the case, I’d rather others (including you) be correct, instead of me.

    Don’t worry, we are.

    I’m not worried.

    On the other hand, your response to what is ultimately simply a hypothesis of mine makes me think you might be.

    I had no intention of triggering anyone with my post.

    As to who was right, we’ll just have to wait and see how events unfold. It could be none of us got it right.

  378. @Greasy William
    @Sean

    The Russian military is growing stronger and the Ukrainian military is growing weaker. There does not appear to be any prospect in the foreseeable future of Ukraine breaking through Russian lines. Absent direct US intervention, Russia can continue its slow grind strategy indefinitely.

    Replies: @Sean

    Absent direct US intervention, Russia can continue its slow grind strategy indefinitely.

    “Indefinitely” sums up the mindset of the Kremlin since the opening weeks, but Shoigu is a yes man not a military man and yet he is the advisor Putin relies on. Putin is innately wary of big initiatives but the time has come for them.The Russian’s need to re-think their strategy and have a timetabled plan for victory. That will require a decisive operation such as driving for Kiev, because it would have to be defended with all available Ukrainian forces and that will enable Surovikin to ring to battle and destroy the enemy’s army. He wants to I am sure, but he is being held back by the Kremlin, who are misinformed about the extent to which the West is comfortable with the current way Russia is waging the war. Russia needs to seize the initiative by amping its effort up and driving for a decisive objective and concomitantly important battle. That will be entail a greater risk than is currently being run, but offers the best chance of final victory.

    • Replies: @Greasy William
    @Sean

    If the war continues along its current trajectory, how long would you estimate that it would take for the West to build a Ukrainian force capable of achieving operational breakthrough? My guess is that we are 2 years minimum away from that, and more like 5. If that even.

    NATO forced Ukraine to launch this suicide offensive expecting that Ukraine would reach the Sea of Azov. Instead it appears that the Ukrainians are not even going to be able to reach the first Russian defensive line. In most sectors, they appear unable to get even half way to said line.

    Ukraine will achieve no breakthroughs without first achieving air superiority.

  379. AP says:
    @Dmitry
    @Ivashka the fool


    Poor kids dying for social engineering simulacra
     
    This is the same of most wars in history. Do you think it was better to die in "Battle of Tannenberg"? "Battle of Tsushima"?
    http://tolstoy-lit.ru/tolstoy/publicistika/odumajtes.htm


    It's better, from perspective of ordinary people, to live as a computer scientists and doctor.

    But even to prioritize human rights and perspective of the ordinary people, in large overpopulated society created after invention of agriculture, this requires the installation of democratic societies, with balance of power, wide distribution of power, equal access for information, independent legal system, government as servants of the citizenry.

    Even with this, it's still possible for wars of the democracies. But if you don't have this change of power balance, then the decisions can easily prioritize self-interest of rulers who don't care about loss of some excess males from the population. Putin said, they could just die in accidents or alcoholism. https://www.pravda.com.ua/rus/news/2022/11/25/7377985/

    Replies: @AP

    Poor kids dying for social engineering simulacra

    This is the same of most wars in history. Do you think it was better to die in “Battle of Tannenberg”? “Battle of Tsushima”?

    You are correct.

    Since people are discussing Celine, I’ll repost a passage from Journey to the End of the Night (a great book), about this process, which began with mass literacy:

    [MORE]

    It’s the philosophers . . . another point to look out for while we’re at it … who first started giving the people ideas . . , when all they’d known up until then was the catechism! They began, so they proclaimed, to educate the people . . . Ah! What truths they had to reveal! Beautiful! brilliant! unprecedented truths! And the people were dazzled! That’s it! they said. That’s the stuff! Let’s go and die for it! The people are always dying to die! That’s the way they are! ‘Long live Diderot!’ they yelled. And ‘Long live Voltaire!’ ….And long live everybody! Those guys at least don’t let the beloved people molder in ignorance and fetishism! They show the people the roads of Freedom! Emancipation! Things went fast after that! First teach everybody to read the papers! That’s the way to salvation! Hurry hurry! No more illiterates! We don’t need them anymore! Nothing but citizen-soldiers! Who vote! Who read! And who fight! And who march! And send kisses from the front! In no time the people were good and ripe! The enthusiasm of the liberated has to be good for something, doesn’t it? Danton wasn’t eloquent for the hell of it. With a few phrases, so rousing that we can still hear them today, he had the people mobilized before you could say fiddlesticks! That was when the first battalions of emancipated maniacs marched off! … the first voting, flagmatic suckers that Dumouriez led away to get themselves drilled full of holes in Flanders!… The free-gratis soldier . . . was something really new … So new that when Goethe arrived in Valmy… he was flabbergasted. At the sight of those ragged, impassioned cohorts, who had come of their own free will to get themselves disemboweled by the King of Prussia in defense of a patriotic fiction no one had ever heard of, Goethe realized that he still had much to learn. This day,’ he declaimed grandiloquently as befitted the habits of his genius, ‘marks the beginning of a new era!’ He could say that again! The system proved successful . . . pretty soon they were mass-producing heroes, and in the end, the system was so well perfected that they cost practically nothing. Everyone was delighted. Bismarck, the two Napoleons, Barrès, Elsa the Horsewoman. The religion of the flag promptly replaced the cult of heaven, an old cloud which had already been deflated by the Reformation and reduced to a network of episcopal money boxes. In olden times the fanatical fashion was: ‘Long live Jesus! Burn the heretics!’ . . . But heretics, after all, were few and voluntary . . . Whereas today vast hordes of men are fired with aim and purpose by cries of: ‘Hang the limp turnips! The juiceless lemons! The innocent readers! By the millions, eyes right!’ … Let whole legions of them perish, turn into smidgens, bleed, smolder in acid—and all that to make the Patrie more beloved, more fair, and more joyful! ”

    • LOL: Wokechoke
    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @AP

    We have go pro now and drone cams.

    Dying for clicks.

    , @Ivashka the fool
    @AP

    Be careful AP, by posting this kind of text you will end up coming out as a Traditionalist.

    🙂

  380. @Dmitry
    @Sean


    very vulnerable to expropriatory taxes by the West.

     

    Well, the situation is not as bad as they describe in the media. Sanctions against Russians outside Russia, are still very limited. Also, a large part of Russian elite have additional citizenships, their money was always in the West and avoid these problems. It's really Russian upper middle class, which has less resources to manage the situation.

    I would say, the easy answer to these problems, is to become a good immigrant, who assimilates to the Western countries.

    . I have read that uniquely the age of mothers fell in it for decades. Meanwhile in the West and everywhere else comparable, women had their first child at older and older ages
     
    The age of first childbirth was falling in the 1990s, while fertility rate was also falling.

    This is why the discussions of these forums where people are worried about fertility rates and say "women have children earlier" are not very realistic.

    Postsoviet countries have low age of first childbirth and low fertility rate. For comparison, Israel has very high age of first childbirth and higher fertility rate.

    Also, if fertility rate is below replacement, then the earlier childbirth will increases the speed of the population decline, because it reduces the distance between generations.

    If the cycle of generations is happening faster at below replacement rate, then population will later age at a comparatively faster rate – once those born in below replacement cohorts pass median age of the population, than if those same generations were cycled more slowly.

    If at this subreplacement rate, tempo effect (postpone of birth to an older age), will result in a significantly larger total population size in the future.

    -

    In Europe the situation is sub-replacement fertility with rising ages of women having children. The latter means that the effect of the sub-replacement fertility on the eventual population is lower, than if women were having children younger with sub-replacement fertility.

    Replies: @Sean

    Well, the situation is not as bad as they describe in the media. Sanctions against Russians outside Russia, are still very limited. Also, a large part of Russian elite have additional citizenships, their money was always in the West and avoid these problems. It’s really Russian upper middle class, which has less resources to manage the situation.

    I would say, the easy answer to these problems, is to become a good immigrant, who assimilates to the Western countries.

    Russian émigré super rich are going to be in a West that is looking for more taxes from all the super rich even the Western ones and every one else. Previously higher taxes were avoided by raiding the defence budget to pay for inexorably rising social spending (Britain has done this to an extreme), but the SMO has put an end to that.

  381. AP says:
    @Sean
    @Dmitry

    De Maistre found to his horror in the salons of St Petersburg, that instead of social hierarchy and the strong hand of law, the fashionable etherealities of French revolutionary philosophy he was fleeing had been taken up by the Russian intelligentsia.


    http://www.martin-van-creveld.com/2336-2/
    While it is always possible to find precedents—going back, in this ease, to the great 17th-century Cossack revolt against Poland/Lithuania {I've read it was against the arrendator Jews of the Polish lords Sean}—Ukrainian nationalism is mainly a product of the nineteenth century when country’s western provinces were strongly influenced by the Austrian empire. Much later this fact enabled Russian President Vladimir Putin to claim that it was not a native movement but an imported one..

    In Ukraine as in other countries, initially nationalism was generated by a tiny urban elite of highly cultured literati by no means representative of the people as a whole. In Ukraine as in other countries, members of this elite sometimes went to the countryside in the hope of discovering and preserving “aboriginal” and “pure” traditions in which to anchor their views. In Ukraine as in other countries, some such traditions were invented almost ex nihil. Old or new, they provided people—mainly Russians, Ukrainians, and Poles—with additional reasons for fighting each other tooth and nail; nowhere more so than in the “Bloodlands” (historian Timothy D. Snyder) of Eastern Europe.

    On the other hand, many famous “Ukrainian” (in the sense that they were born in Ukraine) writers actually wrote in Russian. Nikolai Gogol, the best-known “Ukrainian” writer of all, was born in Sorochyntsi, a Cossack village in what is now Ukraine’s Poltava Oblast, but wrote in Russian. The same applied to Anna Akhmatova and Isaac Babel (both from Odessa) and Mikhail Bulgakov (from Kiev). This list could easily be extended
     

    Replies: @Dmitry, @AP

    Sorry, but Creveld’s passage is full of nonsense:

    Ukrainian nationalism is mainly a product of the nineteenth century when country’s western provinces were strongly influenced by the Austrian empire.

    1. Most nationalisms were products of the late 18th century and 19th century,

    2. The Ukrainian one originated in the Russian Empire and imported by the Austrians in order to defeat the local Russophilia of the natives (which had been useful and originally supported by the Austrians in the early-mid 19th century when Russia was an ally, but then became dangerous when Russia became a rival)

    In Ukraine as in other countries, initially nationalism was generated by a tiny urban elite of highly cultured literati by no means representative of the people as a whole.

    This is nonsense. In Ukraine nationalism was formulated by people from the countryside or from small market towns in the country, not urban elites. The main national poet, Taras Shevchenko, was literally a serf. The other figures were mostly rural gentry or of rural Cossack officer descent. Rural origins were a defining feature of early Ukrainian nationalists and something that differentiated them from their Russian rivals. It also made them better connected to the peasants, whereas the Russians were rather alienated from them despite idolizing them.

    Other figures:

    Ivan Kotliarevsky, first author to write in the Ukrainian language, petty gentry from the town of Poltava, which had about 8,000 people when he lived there

    Panteleimon Kulish, who standardized the Ukrainian language, from an impoverished former Cossack officer family, from a small town in Sumy region

    Volodymyr Antonovych, early Ukrainian historian, from an impoverished noble family of Polish descent, from the small town of Makhnivka

    Mykhailo Hrushevsky, national historian, mother was from a Ukrainian village but he himself grew up in cities

    Ivan Franko – mother was poor village gentry, father a blacksmith of German settler origin – born in a small town

    On the other hand, many famous “Ukrainian” (in the sense that they were born in Ukraine) writers actually wrote in Russian. Nikolai Gogol, the best-known “Ukrainian” writer of all, was born in Sorochyntsi, a Cossack village in what is now Ukraine’s Poltava Oblast, but wrote in Russian. The same applied to Anna Akhmatova and Isaac Babel (both from Odessa) and Mikhail Bulgakov (from Kiev). This list could easily be extended

    Above, the only Ukrainian on the list (Gogol) was from a village, while the others were from cities.
    The ethnic Russian (Bulgakov) was from Kiev and the Jew (Babel) and half-Russian, half-Ukrainian (Akhmatova) were from Odessa.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @AP


    2. The Ukrainian one originated in the Russian Empire and imported by the Austrians in order to defeat the local Russophilia of the natives (which had been useful and originally supported by the Austrians in the early-mid 19th century when Russia was an ally, but then became dangerous when Russia became a rival)
     
    Russia's greatest historical sin from a Russian nationalist perspective is not conquering Galicia back in either 1848-1849 (could have been done either in exchange for helping Austria crush the Hungarians, or in exchange for helping the Hungarians secure their independence from Austria), 1866 (when Austria was busy fighting Prussia and when Russia could have legitimately argued that it was entitled to revenge on Austria for Austria's neutrality during the Crimean War), or 1870 (when Prussia was busy fighting France and thus could not help defend Austria).

    Had Russia conquered Galicia at any of those points in time, Ukrainian nationalism would have likely been strangled in its cradle. AFAIK, it only really became a huge thing after 1880, which is also when most of Galicia became literate (1880-1920).

    Zaporizhia isn’t Ukrainian like Kalinigrad is Russian.
     
    Completely agreed! In fact, if it wasn't for German aggression in WWII, Germany's claim on East Prussia would be very solid. Northern East Prussia, other than Memel, was overwhelmingly German, and southern East Prussia was overwhelmingly German in terms of its political allegiance (as per the 1920 plebiscite there) even though a majority of its population was Polish, albeit Protestant rather than Catholic as Poles in Poland were.

    Replies: @Mikhail

  382. @Sean
    The SMO has went from one extreme to another, first an attempted coup de main to conquer a huge country within a week, then a snail's pace brad advance that cannot be decisive before Ukraine gets all sorts of Western weapons, possibly even a Western army being built up by countries like Poland.

    Markus Reisner, Colonel Austrian Armed Forces : “The Americans ... always provide the Ukrainians with just enough to defend themselves. But not much more, either. And that’s the key thing: the U.S. is not cornering the Russians, because it wants to avoid escalation.”
     
    Yevgeny Prigozhin's argument with Sergei Shoigu seems to be partly strategic and must be in agreement with an increasing number of Russian regular army generals privately thinking that aging civilian defence minister Shoigu is telling Putin what he wants to hear (everything is going swimmingly) while the war dragging on erodes Russia's relative advantages. Prigozhin is surely not the only one who thinks it is now urgent force to a decision instead of acting like Russia has all the time in the world--the West is gearing up.

    Wagner is close to being in position for a Thunder Run to Kiev now. If the Kremlin decides that a change of strategy to an operation with the goal of final victory in the foreseeable future is now required, then an all out assault on the Ukrainian capital would fit the bill.

    Replies: @Greasy William, @Wokechoke

    This is definitely not the case. Every one of these generals is keen to emulate Pierce Edmond De Lacy, Suverov, Potemkin, Kutusov to keep Crimea and Donbas.

    • Replies: @Sean
    @Wokechoke

    Russia started this war with more of an edge in deployable military potential than it now enjoys, and given that the collective West's potential military productive capacity greatly exceeds Russia's I see no reason to assume that a long grinding war in which Western production lines for shells and weapons currently from stocks being husbanded may be restarted and kept going in an open ended way could be a safe bet for Putin. While RusFed has the resources it is being stingy with them, and that is not in the Russian military tradition at all. When the original American plan for D Day was shown to General Bernard Montgomery he said it was unworkable and there needed to be far more troops in the invasion force. That got the plan changed.

    Never forget that Shoigu signed off on a plan formulated by Gerasimov-who certainly ought to have known much better--to invade Ukraine with what all observers said before the first shot was fired was was an inadequate force. Though small the initial invasion deployed the best professional troops in the Russia armed forces and lost a considerable number of them. This point was where the false economizing really should have stopped and the principle of concentrating the most massive force feasible to bring to battle and destroy the enemy army should have been the guide.

    Putin obviously views a raising a large force for major new offensive now as impulsiveness, which is anathema to him. He needs someone to tell him what yes men careerists Shoigu and Gerasimov won't. Those two are loathed in the Russian army you know

  383. @AP
    @Dmitry


    Poor kids dying for social engineering simulacra

    This is the same of most wars in history. Do you think it was better to die in “Battle of Tannenberg”? “Battle of Tsushima”?
     
    You are correct.

    Since people are discussing Celine, I'll repost a passage from Journey to the End of the Night (a great book), about this process, which began with mass literacy:


    It’s the philosophers . . . another point to look out for while we’re at it … who first started giving the people ideas . . , when all they’d known up until then was the catechism! They began, so they proclaimed, to educate the people . . . Ah! What truths they had to reveal! Beautiful! brilliant! unprecedented truths! And the people were dazzled! That’s it! they said. That’s the stuff! Let’s go and die for it! The people are always dying to die! That’s the way they are! ‘Long live Diderot!’ they yelled. And ‘Long live Voltaire!’ ….And long live everybody! Those guys at least don’t let the beloved people molder in ignorance and fetishism! They show the people the roads of Freedom! Emancipation! Things went fast after that! First teach everybody to read the papers! That’s the way to salvation! Hurry hurry! No more illiterates! We don’t need them anymore! Nothing but citizen-soldiers! Who vote! Who read! And who fight! And who march! And send kisses from the front! In no time the people were good and ripe! The enthusiasm of the liberated has to be good for something, doesn’t it? Danton wasn’t eloquent for the hell of it. With a few phrases, so rousing that we can still hear them today, he had the people mobilized before you could say fiddlesticks! That was when the first battalions of emancipated maniacs marched off! … the first voting, flagmatic suckers that Dumouriez led away to get themselves drilled full of holes in Flanders!… The free-gratis soldier . . . was something really new … So new that when Goethe arrived in Valmy… he was flabbergasted. At the sight of those ragged, impassioned cohorts, who had come of their own free will to get themselves disemboweled by the King of Prussia in defense of a patriotic fiction no one had ever heard of, Goethe realized that he still had much to learn. This day,’ he declaimed grandiloquently as befitted the habits of his genius, ‘marks the beginning of a new era!’ He could say that again! The system proved successful . . . pretty soon they were mass-producing heroes, and in the end, the system was so well perfected that they cost practically nothing. Everyone was delighted. Bismarck, the two Napoleons, Barrès, Elsa the Horsewoman. The religion of the flag promptly replaced the cult of heaven, an old cloud which had already been deflated by the Reformation and reduced to a network of episcopal money boxes. In olden times the fanatical fashion was: ‘Long live Jesus! Burn the heretics!’ . . . But heretics, after all, were few and voluntary . . . Whereas today vast hordes of men are fired with aim and purpose by cries of: ‘Hang the limp turnips! The juiceless lemons! The innocent readers! By the millions, eyes right!’ … Let whole legions of them perish, turn into smidgens, bleed, smolder in acid—and all that to make the Patrie more beloved, more fair, and more joyful! ”

     

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @Ivashka the fool

    We have go pro now and drone cams.

    Dying for clicks.

  384. AP says:
    @Ivashka the fool
    @AP


    If China invaded and occupied parts of Russia would you denigrate the sacrifice of those who resist by saying “RusFed is unworthy of dying for?”
     
    It depends, if they took back Manchuria / Primoskyi Kray, I wouldn't care. It was theirs for much longer than it was Russian. Same about Japan taking back the Kuriles, although not Sakhalin, which was settled by Russians before the Japanese invaded.

    OTOH, if Balts and or Finns invaded Saint-Petersburg, that would be another story, or if Poles and Lithuanians moved against Smolensk. But I wouldn't care about Germans taking back Kaliningrad, it's actually theirs.

    You see, it's not borders that are important, but historical justice. If people have roots somewhere, they should have rights there. That's what Ukrainian nationalists don't seem to get because they think according to international regulations and not according to понятия. If they were more balanced, they'd have given Russians enough rights in Ukraine, and all this story would be moot and there would be no war. But they were too insecure, which is understandable for people who had never really governed their own affairs, and actually still don't do.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @AP

    It depends, if they took back Manchuria / Primoskyi Kray, I wouldn’t care. It was theirs for much longer than it was Russian. Same about Japan taking back the Kuriles, although not Sakhalin, which was settled by Russians before the Japanese invaded.

    How about Crimea? Didn’t have a Russian majority until the Tatars were expelled after World War II.

    You see, it’s not borders that are important, but historical justice. If people have roots somewhere, they should have rights there. That’s what Ukrainian nationalists don’t seem to get because they think according to international regulations and not according to понятия.

    The problem is that the areas Ukrainians and Russians are fighting over didn’t have longstanding roots from either nation. All there is: percentage of each group, and international borders. Crimea and urban Donbas are Ukrainian by international borders but not by majority population, the lands controlled by Kiev prior to February 2022 were both Ukrainian by international borders and by majority population. As for history – those lands (not Crimea, but pre-2022 Ukraine) were majority Ukrainian by 1897 too. Difference was that cities (small back then) were Russian, countryside was Ukrainian while provinces as a whole were Ukrainian. When the cities grew due to an influx of surrounding villagers, they achieved Ukrainian majorities.

    So Russians have no legitimate claims upon Ukraine in the 2014-2022 borders. Zaporizhia isn’t Ukrainian like Kalinigrad is Russian.

    • Replies: @Mikhail
    @AP


    How about Crimea? Didn’t have a Russian majority until the Tatars were expelled after World War II.
     
    Wrong!

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Crimea

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @AP

    , @LatW
    @AP

    So which map is the most accurate one when it comes to the distribution of the Ukrainian people? Meaning, any territory where Ukrainians have lived in considerable numbers, let's say, in the 19th century or the beginning of the 20th century. Not any kind of state borders, but their ethnic and linguistic space. You may have already posted a few at some point but do you have any good examples?

    There is a maximalist map such as this one (but how accurate is it?). Knowing that Ukrainians lived beyond their current borders (Kuban', Belgorod), is there an ethnic map that is accurate and shows their historical lands? I have seen the UPA map, which was larger than the current territory but, of course, that map is too "political" (although it must be based on something tangible not just nationalist aspirations).

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/5d/Map_of_Ukraine_%28postcard_1919%29.jpg

    Found this one as well (in the link):

    https://andreistp.livejournal.com/3480543.html

    Replies: @AP

    , @Ivashka the fool
    @AP

    I actually agree with what you wrote here. Yes Crimea is originally Tatar and before them Goth (the Theodoro Goths of Mangup). And yes neither Russians, nor Ukrainians have firm historical rights on the Wild Field (Дикое поле) that became Novorossya under Catherine the Great. It was Desht e Qipchack for way longer than it was Russian and even more so than it was Ukrainian. We both know that there was no Ukraine wherever to be found (with the notable exclusion of the Polish litterati) when Potyomkin conquered and settled these lands for the Russian Imperial Crown. Now, this Crown Itself, or rather the establishment around it, was Russian in name only, it was in fact a cosmopolitan elite organized around a German princess (of distant Wendish descent) and a bunch of military leaders some of whom were of Maloross descent. And we both know what the Maloross stands for, that is not Little Russian, but more and better put as Proper Russian because the Mogyla Academy of Kiev followed the Greek/Byzantine manner of describing Rus lands and was keen on placing the onus on the Kievan lands as the original Rus (a bullshit marketing and PR self-agrandising stunt, because Old Ladoga and Novgorod were Rus before Kiev). Basically, we have different branches of Rus, more or less admixed with Vlakh, Turk and Finn, killing each other for no good reason at all on the lands that their ancestors conquered together when they were united. These lands were theirs only because they were united. Now that they become crazy enough to kill each other, in all justice they should lose the control of these lands. The Quipchack were Turkic, alright then let the Turks take back what their ancestors had, the Slavs have shown the whole world how imbecile they are when they are not ruled and administered by the North-Western European Wends/Balts/Vikings/Germans. Let the Turkic peoples thrive where their Scythian ancestors roamed the Steppe. The Turks are less unhinged and are perhaps more capable of unity. And yeah, as the Abrahamic religions go, Islam had a better track record of Empire-building than Orthodox Christianity does. So given that they have betrayed the Old Faith of their ancestors long ago, let them end up Muslims which is the ultimate dead end of any population that has piled betrayal upon betrayal. That would be historical justice, that would be по понятиям. Perhaps then the death of those who died to keep them united and on friendly terms, people such as Mozgovoy and Buzina, Maloross both of them, would be avenged and some balance would be restored in this crazy world of ours.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

  385. If Putin developed a cancer cure, he’d be denounced for not having done so sooner.

    https://www.eurasiareview.com/26062023-post-mutiny-assessment-in-russia-oped/

  386. @AP
    @Ivashka the fool


    It depends, if they took back Manchuria / Primoskyi Kray, I wouldn’t care. It was theirs for much longer than it was Russian. Same about Japan taking back the Kuriles, although not Sakhalin, which was settled by Russians before the Japanese invaded.
     
    How about Crimea? Didn't have a Russian majority until the Tatars were expelled after World War II.

    You see, it’s not borders that are important, but historical justice. If people have roots somewhere, they should have rights there. That’s what Ukrainian nationalists don’t seem to get because they think according to international regulations and not according to понятия.
     
    The problem is that the areas Ukrainians and Russians are fighting over didn't have longstanding roots from either nation. All there is: percentage of each group, and international borders. Crimea and urban Donbas are Ukrainian by international borders but not by majority population, the lands controlled by Kiev prior to February 2022 were both Ukrainian by international borders and by majority population. As for history - those lands (not Crimea, but pre-2022 Ukraine) were majority Ukrainian by 1897 too. Difference was that cities (small back then) were Russian, countryside was Ukrainian while provinces as a whole were Ukrainian. When the cities grew due to an influx of surrounding villagers, they achieved Ukrainian majorities.

    So Russians have no legitimate claims upon Ukraine in the 2014-2022 borders. Zaporizhia isn't Ukrainian like Kalinigrad is Russian.

    Replies: @Mikhail, @LatW, @Ivashka the fool

    How about Crimea? Didn’t have a Russian majority until the Tatars were expelled after World War II.

    Wrong!

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Crimea

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @Mikhail

    AP might have been wrong about the specific details (though technically 49.6% isn't a majority, but it is very close to one and a Russian majority might have been reached by 1944), but he's right about the general picture. IIRC, Crimea still had more Tatars than Russians back in 1897. Thus, the Ottoman Empire could have theoretically lain a legitimate claim to it during WWI, especially if one would have also factored in the descendants of those Tatars who left Crimea in the 19th century and who were living in the Ottoman Empire during WWI.

    Replies: @Mikhail

    , @AP
    @Mikhail

    Since when is less than 50% majority?

    Replies: @Mikhail

  387. @Greasy William
    @Sean

    Russia is not asking for a deal. That's correct. However, eventually the West is going to force Russia to make a choice: allow Ukraine to continue to exist, albeit in substantially shrunken borders... or WWIII. Nothing else is possible. The West will stop at nothing to prevent Russia from dismantling the Ukrainian state.

    Replies: @A123, @Lurker

    I’m not sure the West is in a position to be forcing Russia to do stuff now.

  388. @Greasy William
    @Mr. XYZ

    Putin has entered into a messianic state of mind. Putin doesn't want to just advance what he sees as Russian interests, he wants to make Russia fully into the 3rd Rome. Putin wants to be the greatest conqueror in history. It is no more possible to appease Putin than it was to appease Hitler. Putin will stop at nothing to conquer Ukraine entirely and then he will move south because there is nothing left for him to go after.

    If you talk to any people actually in Russia, there is an upsurge of patriotism and national pride now that has replaced the apathy and despair of the last 30+ years. There is also a huge and extremely sudden upsurge in antisemitism. Add that to the fact that this is a country that remains economically stagnant and saddled with horrendous demographics with little hope for improvement and you have a nation that is ready for war.

    Replies: @keypusher, @Mr. XYZ

    Russians would be better off channeling their energies into breeding more. Russia could invest in large suburban house construction as a part of this process. I consider breeding more and getting more immigration to be more ethical ways of getting extra human capital relative to conquering unwilling people. Russia could still have greatness ahead for it, eventually, similar to how the US found true greatness decades after it failed to conquer Canada back in 1812.

    As for the anti-Semitism, if the anti-Semitism in Russia will get out of control, then Israel should get a lot of new immigrants, which would be great for Israel, other than for the Ultra-Orthodox, who don’t like Russians, especially if they’re not halakhically Jewish.

    • Replies: @Greasy William
    @Mr. XYZ

    I didn't say that Russia should go after Israel. On the contrary, I expect such a path to lead to a global nuclear holocaust. I said that Russia will go after Israel.

  389. @Mikhail
    @AP


    How about Crimea? Didn’t have a Russian majority until the Tatars were expelled after World War II.
     
    Wrong!

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Crimea

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @AP

    AP might have been wrong about the specific details (though technically 49.6% isn’t a majority, but it is very close to one and a Russian majority might have been reached by 1944), but he’s right about the general picture. IIRC, Crimea still had more Tatars than Russians back in 1897. Thus, the Ottoman Empire could have theoretically lain a legitimate claim to it during WWI, especially if one would have also factored in the descendants of those Tatars who left Crimea in the 19th century and who were living in the Ottoman Empire during WWI.

    • LOL: Mikhail
    • Replies: @Mikhail
    @Mr. XYZ


    AP might have been wrong about the specific details (though technically 49.6% isn’t a majority, but it is very close to one and a Russian majority might have been reached by 1944), but he’s right about the general picture. IIRC, Crimea still had more Tatars than Russians back in 1897. Thus, the Ottoman Empire could have theoretically lain a legitimate claim to it during WWI, especially if one would have also factored in the descendants of those Tatars who left Crimea in the 19th century and who were living in the Ottoman Empire during WWI.
     
    You'd be great on MSNBC, CNN, BBC, Sky News, et al. The 1897 census says there were around 35% Tatars to 33% Russians. The Rus Slavs were in Crimea before the Tatars. The Russian Empire academically qualifies as a successor (for lack of a better term) to Rus. Russia reunited with Crimea in reply to slave trade raids emanating from the Crimean Tatar Khanate against Slavs and others.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @AP

  390. @AP
    @Sean

    Sorry, but Creveld's passage is full of nonsense:


    Ukrainian nationalism is mainly a product of the nineteenth century when country’s western provinces were strongly influenced by the Austrian empire.
     
    1. Most nationalisms were products of the late 18th century and 19th century,

    2. The Ukrainian one originated in the Russian Empire and imported by the Austrians in order to defeat the local Russophilia of the natives (which had been useful and originally supported by the Austrians in the early-mid 19th century when Russia was an ally, but then became dangerous when Russia became a rival)

    In Ukraine as in other countries, initially nationalism was generated by a tiny urban elite of highly cultured literati by no means representative of the people as a whole.
     
    This is nonsense. In Ukraine nationalism was formulated by people from the countryside or from small market towns in the country, not urban elites. The main national poet, Taras Shevchenko, was literally a serf. The other figures were mostly rural gentry or of rural Cossack officer descent. Rural origins were a defining feature of early Ukrainian nationalists and something that differentiated them from their Russian rivals. It also made them better connected to the peasants, whereas the Russians were rather alienated from them despite idolizing them.

    Other figures:

    Ivan Kotliarevsky, first author to write in the Ukrainian language, petty gentry from the town of Poltava, which had about 8,000 people when he lived there

    Panteleimon Kulish, who standardized the Ukrainian language, from an impoverished former Cossack officer family, from a small town in Sumy region

    Volodymyr Antonovych, early Ukrainian historian, from an impoverished noble family of Polish descent, from the small town of Makhnivka

    Mykhailo Hrushevsky, national historian, mother was from a Ukrainian village but he himself grew up in cities

    Ivan Franko - mother was poor village gentry, father a blacksmith of German settler origin - born in a small town

    On the other hand, many famous “Ukrainian” (in the sense that they were born in Ukraine) writers actually wrote in Russian. Nikolai Gogol, the best-known “Ukrainian” writer of all, was born in Sorochyntsi, a Cossack village in what is now Ukraine’s Poltava Oblast, but wrote in Russian. The same applied to Anna Akhmatova and Isaac Babel (both from Odessa) and Mikhail Bulgakov (from Kiev). This list could easily be extended
     
    Above, the only Ukrainian on the list (Gogol) was from a village, while the others were from cities.
    The ethnic Russian (Bulgakov) was from Kiev and the Jew (Babel) and half-Russian, half-Ukrainian (Akhmatova) were from Odessa.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    2. The Ukrainian one originated in the Russian Empire and imported by the Austrians in order to defeat the local Russophilia of the natives (which had been useful and originally supported by the Austrians in the early-mid 19th century when Russia was an ally, but then became dangerous when Russia became a rival)

    Russia’s greatest historical sin from a Russian nationalist perspective is not conquering Galicia back in either 1848-1849 (could have been done either in exchange for helping Austria crush the Hungarians, or in exchange for helping the Hungarians secure their independence from Austria), 1866 (when Austria was busy fighting Prussia and when Russia could have legitimately argued that it was entitled to revenge on Austria for Austria’s neutrality during the Crimean War), or 1870 (when Prussia was busy fighting France and thus could not help defend Austria).

    Had Russia conquered Galicia at any of those points in time, Ukrainian nationalism would have likely been strangled in its cradle. AFAIK, it only really became a huge thing after 1880, which is also when most of Galicia became literate (1880-1920).

    Zaporizhia isn’t Ukrainian like Kalinigrad is Russian.

    Completely agreed! In fact, if it wasn’t for German aggression in WWII, Germany’s claim on East Prussia would be very solid. Northern East Prussia, other than Memel, was overwhelmingly German, and southern East Prussia was overwhelmingly German in terms of its political allegiance (as per the 1920 plebiscite there) even though a majority of its population was Polish, albeit Protestant rather than Catholic as Poles in Poland were.

    • Replies: @Mikhail
    @Mr. XYZ


    Russia’s greatest historical sin from a Russian nationalist perspective is not conquering Galicia back in either 1848-1849 (could have been done either in exchange for helping Austria crush the Hungarians, or in exchange for helping the Hungarians secure their independence from Austria), 1866 (when Austria was busy fighting Prussia and when Russia could have legitimately argued that it was entitled to revenge on Austria for Austria’s neutrality during the Crimean War), or 1870 (when Prussia was busy fighting France and thus could not help defend Austria).

    Had Russia conquered Galicia at any of those points in time, Ukrainian nationalism would have likely been strangled in its cradle. AFAIK, it only really became a huge thing after 1880, which is also when most of Galicia became literate (1880-1920).
     
    Russian forces en route to Hungary were well received in that part of what's now modern day Ukraine. I know someone whose father who was from that area of the Austro-Hungarian Empire. Like his father, he considers himself Russian and recalls his father speaking with Cherkess and Cossack border patrol guards about being one nation.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

  391. @Ivashka the fool
    @24th Alabama

    RusFed is not a Kingdom, not even a honest dictatorship. It is a KGB + Noviop cooperative. That's the way it started years ago at the Ozero gated community in Leningrad region, and that's the way it still is today. If enough cooperative members vouched for the Kosher Cook then he might feel reassured that the RusFed Coop manager en chef would not move against him. Lukashenko is a very important Coop member, when a few years ago Luka had a show off with Pynya about Ural Kalyi and its Belarusian branch, the Belarusian KGB humiliated RusFed-ian FSB, while Pynya swallowed. Luka is not a joker like Pynya is.

    BTW, speaking of Pynya, a funny thing happened a couple of days ago, it seems that he acquired the magic skill of ubiquity. He was reported by the official site of RusFed-ian presidential administration as being present at two different events at nearly the same time, which would be impossible given that they are at least half an hour drive from each other. The first event was a strategic council meeting that was probably due to last at least half an hour. But he was also announced as laying a wreath of flowers at some monument. At the second event he was filmed and shown on TV. If we add that there was an occasion where Putin forgot that he spoke German, another one when he had a hard time riding a horse and another one where he said that he served in the Marine Infantry, which he never did, it all becomes quite peculiar. Basically, people are starting to wonder how many "Putins" are there in RusFed and which one of them is the original one if any.

    Perhaps that's why the Kosher Cook has literally called him an old f☆ck (старый муд☆к) not so long ago. He wouldn't have spoken that way of a Dreadful Dictator and repeated Times Magazine Man of the Year that the West has carried in its imagination for a couple of decades already. But he could say that of an aging actor and his colleagues trying the best they can to impersonate an aging Coop manager...

    Replies: @QCIC, @24th Alabama

    By any objective measure Vladimir Putin is the greatest Russian leader of
    the last two hundred years, and is recognized as such by most of the world
    outside the reach of the virulent Western media.

    As far as I know he has attempted to peacefully settle every internal and
    international dispute by peaceful means, using force only as a last resort,
    as we would expect of the only remaining Christian leader of a major nation,
    excepting Italy.

    Obviously, you style yourself as a sort of a Russian insider, albeit a petulant one, so naturally I am curious about the reason for your angst if you can disclose that without revealing your identity. Surely, your beef against Vlad is not entirely due to a bias against short guys. Many men dislike tall women, a fact that has worked to the advantage of us who don’t care.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @24th Alabama

    Poland's leadership isn't Christian? Or Ukraine's pre-2019 leadership, for that matter?

    Replies: @24th Alabama

    , @Ivashka the fool
    @24th Alabama

    My beef with Pynya is that he isn't Russian and isn't a leader. Simple enough?

    Now, about me being an insider on Russian affairs, we have a better one among us here on this forum: Dmitry is the real RF insider here. Never mind him being a Noviop, that's as close as it gets to being Russian in most people's understanding.

    This is due to the Russian ethnos actually dying under the brilliant guidance, and the PR glitter of Pynya the dwarf and his clique of corrupt and inept parasite underlings.

    Any other questions?

    Replies: @silviosilver, @Emil Nikola Richard, @24th Alabama

  392. @Mr. XYZ
    @Mikhail

    AP might have been wrong about the specific details (though technically 49.6% isn't a majority, but it is very close to one and a Russian majority might have been reached by 1944), but he's right about the general picture. IIRC, Crimea still had more Tatars than Russians back in 1897. Thus, the Ottoman Empire could have theoretically lain a legitimate claim to it during WWI, especially if one would have also factored in the descendants of those Tatars who left Crimea in the 19th century and who were living in the Ottoman Empire during WWI.

    Replies: @Mikhail

    AP might have been wrong about the specific details (though technically 49.6% isn’t a majority, but it is very close to one and a Russian majority might have been reached by 1944), but he’s right about the general picture. IIRC, Crimea still had more Tatars than Russians back in 1897. Thus, the Ottoman Empire could have theoretically lain a legitimate claim to it during WWI, especially if one would have also factored in the descendants of those Tatars who left Crimea in the 19th century and who were living in the Ottoman Empire during WWI.

    You’d be great on MSNBC, CNN, BBC, Sky News, et al. The 1897 census says there were around 35% Tatars to 33% Russians. The Rus Slavs were in Crimea before the Tatars. The Russian Empire academically qualifies as a successor (for lack of a better term) to Rus. Russia reunited with Crimea in reply to slave trade raids emanating from the Crimean Tatar Khanate against Slavs and others.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @Mikhail

    The Crimean Tatars aren't purely of Tatar descent but also descended in part from pre-Tatar Crimean locals, no?

    Replies: @Mikhail

    , @AP
    @Mikhail


    The Rus Slavs were in Crimea before the Tatars
     
    Rus had an outpost in Crimea. The Crimean Tatars are of course descended from a mix of Tatar invaders and Greeks, Ostrogoths and others who lived there from ancient times. Saying that those people trace back only to the 13th century is as dumb as claiming that Turks in Turkey are some kind of newcomers.

    Replies: @Mikhail

  393. @Mr. XYZ
    @AP


    2. The Ukrainian one originated in the Russian Empire and imported by the Austrians in order to defeat the local Russophilia of the natives (which had been useful and originally supported by the Austrians in the early-mid 19th century when Russia was an ally, but then became dangerous when Russia became a rival)
     
    Russia's greatest historical sin from a Russian nationalist perspective is not conquering Galicia back in either 1848-1849 (could have been done either in exchange for helping Austria crush the Hungarians, or in exchange for helping the Hungarians secure their independence from Austria), 1866 (when Austria was busy fighting Prussia and when Russia could have legitimately argued that it was entitled to revenge on Austria for Austria's neutrality during the Crimean War), or 1870 (when Prussia was busy fighting France and thus could not help defend Austria).

    Had Russia conquered Galicia at any of those points in time, Ukrainian nationalism would have likely been strangled in its cradle. AFAIK, it only really became a huge thing after 1880, which is also when most of Galicia became literate (1880-1920).

    Zaporizhia isn’t Ukrainian like Kalinigrad is Russian.
     
    Completely agreed! In fact, if it wasn't for German aggression in WWII, Germany's claim on East Prussia would be very solid. Northern East Prussia, other than Memel, was overwhelmingly German, and southern East Prussia was overwhelmingly German in terms of its political allegiance (as per the 1920 plebiscite there) even though a majority of its population was Polish, albeit Protestant rather than Catholic as Poles in Poland were.

    Replies: @Mikhail

    Russia’s greatest historical sin from a Russian nationalist perspective is not conquering Galicia back in either 1848-1849 (could have been done either in exchange for helping Austria crush the Hungarians, or in exchange for helping the Hungarians secure their independence from Austria), 1866 (when Austria was busy fighting Prussia and when Russia could have legitimately argued that it was entitled to revenge on Austria for Austria’s neutrality during the Crimean War), or 1870 (when Prussia was busy fighting France and thus could not help defend Austria).

    Had Russia conquered Galicia at any of those points in time, Ukrainian nationalism would have likely been strangled in its cradle. AFAIK, it only really became a huge thing after 1880, which is also when most of Galicia became literate (1880-1920).

    Russian forces en route to Hungary were well received in that part of what’s now modern day Ukraine. I know someone whose father who was from that area of the Austro-Hungarian Empire. Like his father, he considers himself Russian and recalls his father speaking with Cherkess and Cossack border patrol guards about being one nation.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @Mikhail

    From a geopolitical and strategic point of view, Russia should have simply supported Hungarian independence back in 1848-1849. No one could have stopped them. They would have annexed Galicia for themselves and secured a sphere of influence for themselves in Hungary, thus paving the way for the long-term expansion of the Russian sphere of influence further south into the Balkans without Austria opposing them.

    Replies: @Mikhail

  394. @Mikhail
    @Mr. XYZ


    AP might have been wrong about the specific details (though technically 49.6% isn’t a majority, but it is very close to one and a Russian majority might have been reached by 1944), but he’s right about the general picture. IIRC, Crimea still had more Tatars than Russians back in 1897. Thus, the Ottoman Empire could have theoretically lain a legitimate claim to it during WWI, especially if one would have also factored in the descendants of those Tatars who left Crimea in the 19th century and who were living in the Ottoman Empire during WWI.
     
    You'd be great on MSNBC, CNN, BBC, Sky News, et al. The 1897 census says there were around 35% Tatars to 33% Russians. The Rus Slavs were in Crimea before the Tatars. The Russian Empire academically qualifies as a successor (for lack of a better term) to Rus. Russia reunited with Crimea in reply to slave trade raids emanating from the Crimean Tatar Khanate against Slavs and others.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @AP

    The Crimean Tatars aren’t purely of Tatar descent but also descended in part from pre-Tatar Crimean locals, no?

    • Replies: @Mikhail
    @Mr. XYZ


    The Crimean Tatars aren’t purely of Tatar descent but also descended in part from pre-Tatar Crimean locals, no?
     
    Definite BBC, CNN, Sky News, MSNBC material. Same with Rus Slavs who were in Crimea before the Tatars.
  395. @Mikhail
    @Mr. XYZ


    Russia’s greatest historical sin from a Russian nationalist perspective is not conquering Galicia back in either 1848-1849 (could have been done either in exchange for helping Austria crush the Hungarians, or in exchange for helping the Hungarians secure their independence from Austria), 1866 (when Austria was busy fighting Prussia and when Russia could have legitimately argued that it was entitled to revenge on Austria for Austria’s neutrality during the Crimean War), or 1870 (when Prussia was busy fighting France and thus could not help defend Austria).

    Had Russia conquered Galicia at any of those points in time, Ukrainian nationalism would have likely been strangled in its cradle. AFAIK, it only really became a huge thing after 1880, which is also when most of Galicia became literate (1880-1920).
     
    Russian forces en route to Hungary were well received in that part of what's now modern day Ukraine. I know someone whose father who was from that area of the Austro-Hungarian Empire. Like his father, he considers himself Russian and recalls his father speaking with Cherkess and Cossack border patrol guards about being one nation.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    From a geopolitical and strategic point of view, Russia should have simply supported Hungarian independence back in 1848-1849. No one could have stopped them. They would have annexed Galicia for themselves and secured a sphere of influence for themselves in Hungary, thus paving the way for the long-term expansion of the Russian sphere of influence further south into the Balkans without Austria opposing them.

    • Replies: @Mikhail
    @Mr. XYZ


    From a geopolitical and strategic point of view, Russia should have simply supported Hungarian independence back in 1848-1849. No one could have stopped them. They would have annexed Galicia for themselves and secured a sphere of influence for themselves in Hungary, thus paving the way for the long-term expansion of the Russian sphere of influence further south into the Balkans without Austria opposing them.
     
    Pan-monarchist empire commitment which the Habsburgs didn't reciprocally honor some years later.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

  396. @24th Alabama
    @Ivashka the fool

    By any objective measure Vladimir Putin is the greatest Russian leader of
    the last two hundred years, and is recognized as such by most of the world
    outside the reach of the virulent Western media.

    As far as I know he has attempted to peacefully settle every internal and
    international dispute by peaceful means, using force only as a last resort,
    as we would expect of the only remaining Christian leader of a major nation,
    excepting Italy.

    Obviously, you style yourself as a sort of a Russian insider, albeit a petulant one, so naturally I am curious about the reason for your angst if you can disclose that without revealing your identity. Surely, your beef against Vlad is not entirely due to a bias against short guys. Many men dislike tall women, a fact that has worked to the advantage of us who don't care.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Ivashka the fool

    Poland’s leadership isn’t Christian? Or Ukraine’s pre-2019 leadership, for that matter?

    • Replies: @24th Alabama
    @Mr. XYZ

    Poland and Ukraine are "major" nations?
    Okay, no quibble.

  397. @Mr. XYZ
    @Greasy William

    Russians would be better off channeling their energies into breeding more. Russia could invest in large suburban house construction as a part of this process. I consider breeding more and getting more immigration to be more ethical ways of getting extra human capital relative to conquering unwilling people. Russia could still have greatness ahead for it, eventually, similar to how the US found true greatness decades after it failed to conquer Canada back in 1812.

    As for the anti-Semitism, if the anti-Semitism in Russia will get out of control, then Israel should get a lot of new immigrants, which would be great for Israel, other than for the Ultra-Orthodox, who don't like Russians, especially if they're not halakhically Jewish.

    Replies: @Greasy William

    I didn’t say that Russia should go after Israel. On the contrary, I expect such a path to lead to a global nuclear holocaust. I said that Russia will go after Israel.

  398. @AP
    @Ivashka the fool


    It depends, if they took back Manchuria / Primoskyi Kray, I wouldn’t care. It was theirs for much longer than it was Russian. Same about Japan taking back the Kuriles, although not Sakhalin, which was settled by Russians before the Japanese invaded.
     
    How about Crimea? Didn't have a Russian majority until the Tatars were expelled after World War II.

    You see, it’s not borders that are important, but historical justice. If people have roots somewhere, they should have rights there. That’s what Ukrainian nationalists don’t seem to get because they think according to international regulations and not according to понятия.
     
    The problem is that the areas Ukrainians and Russians are fighting over didn't have longstanding roots from either nation. All there is: percentage of each group, and international borders. Crimea and urban Donbas are Ukrainian by international borders but not by majority population, the lands controlled by Kiev prior to February 2022 were both Ukrainian by international borders and by majority population. As for history - those lands (not Crimea, but pre-2022 Ukraine) were majority Ukrainian by 1897 too. Difference was that cities (small back then) were Russian, countryside was Ukrainian while provinces as a whole were Ukrainian. When the cities grew due to an influx of surrounding villagers, they achieved Ukrainian majorities.

    So Russians have no legitimate claims upon Ukraine in the 2014-2022 borders. Zaporizhia isn't Ukrainian like Kalinigrad is Russian.

    Replies: @Mikhail, @LatW, @Ivashka the fool

    So which map is the most accurate one when it comes to the distribution of the Ukrainian people? Meaning, any territory where Ukrainians have lived in considerable numbers, let’s say, in the 19th century or the beginning of the 20th century. Not any kind of state borders, but their ethnic and linguistic space. You may have already posted a few at some point but do you have any good examples?

    There is a maximalist map such as this one (but how accurate is it?). Knowing that Ukrainians lived beyond their current borders (Kuban’, Belgorod), is there an ethnic map that is accurate and shows their historical lands? I have seen the UPA map, which was larger than the current territory but, of course, that map is too “political” (although it must be based on something tangible not just nationalist aspirations).

    Found this one as well (in the link):

    https://andreistp.livejournal.com/3480543.html

    • Replies: @AP
    @LatW

    The maximalist one you show is inaccurate. It includes territory that might only have 10% Ukrainians.

    This is an accurate “maximalist” map showing “Ukrainian” populated territories from 100 or so years ago. Major caveats: a lot of these people (such as peasants in what is now Belarus) spoke what would be considered Ukrainian but were pre-nationalist and never adopted a Ukrainian national identity; others such as in what is now Russian territory got Russified before that happened. Some in the far West became Rusyns and/or think of themselves as belonging to the Lemko nation.

    Note that on this map Crimea is non-Ukrainian.

    http://ukrainianlaw.blogspot.com/2015/01/ethnographic-map-of-ukraine1949.html

  399. @Sean
    @Greasy William


    Absent direct US intervention, Russia can continue its slow grind strategy indefinitely.
     
    "Indefinitely" sums up the mindset of the Kremlin since the opening weeks, but Shoigu is a yes man not a military man and yet he is the advisor Putin relies on. Putin is innately wary of big initiatives but the time has come for them.The Russian's need to re-think their strategy and have a timetabled plan for victory. That will require a decisive operation such as driving for Kiev, because it would have to be defended with all available Ukrainian forces and that will enable Surovikin to ring to battle and destroy the enemy's army. He wants to I am sure, but he is being held back by the Kremlin, who are misinformed about the extent to which the West is comfortable with the current way Russia is waging the war. Russia needs to seize the initiative by amping its effort up and driving for a decisive objective and concomitantly important battle. That will be entail a greater risk than is currently being run, but offers the best chance of final victory.

    Replies: @Greasy William

    If the war continues along its current trajectory, how long would you estimate that it would take for the West to build a Ukrainian force capable of achieving operational breakthrough? My guess is that we are 2 years minimum away from that, and more like 5. If that even.

    NATO forced Ukraine to launch this suicide offensive expecting that Ukraine would reach the Sea of Azov. Instead it appears that the Ukrainians are not even going to be able to reach the first Russian defensive line. In most sectors, they appear unable to get even half way to said line.

    Ukraine will achieve no breakthroughs without first achieving air superiority.

  400. @Mr. XYZ
    @Mikhail

    The Crimean Tatars aren't purely of Tatar descent but also descended in part from pre-Tatar Crimean locals, no?

    Replies: @Mikhail

    The Crimean Tatars aren’t purely of Tatar descent but also descended in part from pre-Tatar Crimean locals, no?

    Definite BBC, CNN, Sky News, MSNBC material. Same with Rus Slavs who were in Crimea before the Tatars.

  401. @Mr. XYZ
    @Mikhail

    From a geopolitical and strategic point of view, Russia should have simply supported Hungarian independence back in 1848-1849. No one could have stopped them. They would have annexed Galicia for themselves and secured a sphere of influence for themselves in Hungary, thus paving the way for the long-term expansion of the Russian sphere of influence further south into the Balkans without Austria opposing them.

    Replies: @Mikhail

    From a geopolitical and strategic point of view, Russia should have simply supported Hungarian independence back in 1848-1849. No one could have stopped them. They would have annexed Galicia for themselves and secured a sphere of influence for themselves in Hungary, thus paving the way for the long-term expansion of the Russian sphere of influence further south into the Balkans without Austria opposing them.

    Pan-monarchist empire commitment which the Habsburgs didn’t reciprocally honor some years later.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @Mikhail

    That's the thing: Russia should have looked out more for its strategic interests and less for some broad concepts such as pan-monarchical solidarity.

    As a side note, though, if Russia was actually going to go for the latter, then it should have negotiated with Austria(-Hungary) to give them a sphere of influence in the Balkans in order to reduce tensions between them and Russia.

  402. @AP
    @Dmitry


    Poor kids dying for social engineering simulacra

    This is the same of most wars in history. Do you think it was better to die in “Battle of Tannenberg”? “Battle of Tsushima”?
     
    You are correct.

    Since people are discussing Celine, I'll repost a passage from Journey to the End of the Night (a great book), about this process, which began with mass literacy:


    It’s the philosophers . . . another point to look out for while we’re at it … who first started giving the people ideas . . , when all they’d known up until then was the catechism! They began, so they proclaimed, to educate the people . . . Ah! What truths they had to reveal! Beautiful! brilliant! unprecedented truths! And the people were dazzled! That’s it! they said. That’s the stuff! Let’s go and die for it! The people are always dying to die! That’s the way they are! ‘Long live Diderot!’ they yelled. And ‘Long live Voltaire!’ ….And long live everybody! Those guys at least don’t let the beloved people molder in ignorance and fetishism! They show the people the roads of Freedom! Emancipation! Things went fast after that! First teach everybody to read the papers! That’s the way to salvation! Hurry hurry! No more illiterates! We don’t need them anymore! Nothing but citizen-soldiers! Who vote! Who read! And who fight! And who march! And send kisses from the front! In no time the people were good and ripe! The enthusiasm of the liberated has to be good for something, doesn’t it? Danton wasn’t eloquent for the hell of it. With a few phrases, so rousing that we can still hear them today, he had the people mobilized before you could say fiddlesticks! That was when the first battalions of emancipated maniacs marched off! … the first voting, flagmatic suckers that Dumouriez led away to get themselves drilled full of holes in Flanders!… The free-gratis soldier . . . was something really new … So new that when Goethe arrived in Valmy… he was flabbergasted. At the sight of those ragged, impassioned cohorts, who had come of their own free will to get themselves disemboweled by the King of Prussia in defense of a patriotic fiction no one had ever heard of, Goethe realized that he still had much to learn. This day,’ he declaimed grandiloquently as befitted the habits of his genius, ‘marks the beginning of a new era!’ He could say that again! The system proved successful . . . pretty soon they were mass-producing heroes, and in the end, the system was so well perfected that they cost practically nothing. Everyone was delighted. Bismarck, the two Napoleons, Barrès, Elsa the Horsewoman. The religion of the flag promptly replaced the cult of heaven, an old cloud which had already been deflated by the Reformation and reduced to a network of episcopal money boxes. In olden times the fanatical fashion was: ‘Long live Jesus! Burn the heretics!’ . . . But heretics, after all, were few and voluntary . . . Whereas today vast hordes of men are fired with aim and purpose by cries of: ‘Hang the limp turnips! The juiceless lemons! The innocent readers! By the millions, eyes right!’ … Let whole legions of them perish, turn into smidgens, bleed, smolder in acid—and all that to make the Patrie more beloved, more fair, and more joyful! ”

     

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @Ivashka the fool

    Be careful AP, by posting this kind of text you will end up coming out as a Traditionalist.

    🙂

  403. @AP
    @Ivashka the fool


    It depends, if they took back Manchuria / Primoskyi Kray, I wouldn’t care. It was theirs for much longer than it was Russian. Same about Japan taking back the Kuriles, although not Sakhalin, which was settled by Russians before the Japanese invaded.
     
    How about Crimea? Didn't have a Russian majority until the Tatars were expelled after World War II.

    You see, it’s not borders that are important, but historical justice. If people have roots somewhere, they should have rights there. That’s what Ukrainian nationalists don’t seem to get because they think according to international regulations and not according to понятия.
     
    The problem is that the areas Ukrainians and Russians are fighting over didn't have longstanding roots from either nation. All there is: percentage of each group, and international borders. Crimea and urban Donbas are Ukrainian by international borders but not by majority population, the lands controlled by Kiev prior to February 2022 were both Ukrainian by international borders and by majority population. As for history - those lands (not Crimea, but pre-2022 Ukraine) were majority Ukrainian by 1897 too. Difference was that cities (small back then) were Russian, countryside was Ukrainian while provinces as a whole were Ukrainian. When the cities grew due to an influx of surrounding villagers, they achieved Ukrainian majorities.

    So Russians have no legitimate claims upon Ukraine in the 2014-2022 borders. Zaporizhia isn't Ukrainian like Kalinigrad is Russian.

    Replies: @Mikhail, @LatW, @Ivashka the fool

    I actually agree with what you wrote here. Yes Crimea is originally Tatar and before them Goth (the Theodoro Goths of Mangup). And yes neither Russians, nor Ukrainians have firm historical rights on the Wild Field (Дикое поле) that became Novorossya under Catherine the Great. It was Desht e Qipchack for way longer than it was Russian and even more so than it was Ukrainian. We both know that there was no Ukraine wherever to be found (with the notable exclusion of the Polish litterati) when Potyomkin conquered and settled these lands for the Russian Imperial Crown. Now, this Crown Itself, or rather the establishment around it, was Russian in name only, it was in fact a cosmopolitan elite organized around a German princess (of distant Wendish descent) and a bunch of military leaders some of whom were of Maloross descent. And we both know what the Maloross stands for, that is not Little Russian, but more and better put as Proper Russian because the Mogyla Academy of Kiev followed the Greek/Byzantine manner of describing Rus lands and was keen on placing the onus on the Kievan lands as the original Rus (a bullshit marketing and PR self-agrandising stunt, because Old Ladoga and Novgorod were Rus before Kiev). Basically, we have different branches of Rus, more or less admixed with Vlakh, Turk and Finn, killing each other for no good reason at all on the lands that their ancestors conquered together when they were united. These lands were theirs only because they were united. Now that they become crazy enough to kill each other, in all justice they should lose the control of these lands. The Quipchack were Turkic, alright then let the Turks take back what their ancestors had, the Slavs have shown the whole world how imbecile they are when they are not ruled and administered by the North-Western European Wends/Balts/Vikings/Germans. Let the Turkic peoples thrive where their Scythian ancestors roamed the Steppe. The Turks are less unhinged and are perhaps more capable of unity. And yeah, as the Abrahamic religions go, Islam had a better track record of Empire-building than Orthodox Christianity does. So given that they have betrayed the Old Faith of their ancestors long ago, let them end up Muslims which is the ultimate dead end of any population that has piled betrayal upon betrayal. That would be historical justice, that would be по понятиям. Perhaps then the death of those who died to keep them united and on friendly terms, people such as Mozgovoy and Buzina, Maloross both of them, would be avenged and some balance would be restored in this crazy world of ours.

    • Disagree: Mikhail
    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @Ivashka the fool


    Perhaps then the death of those who died to keep them united and on friendly terms, people such as Mozgovoy and Buzina, Maloross both of them, would be avenged and some balance would be restored in this crazy world of ours.
     
    What's with your campaign to avenge the death of Buzina all about anyway (I'm not familiar with Mozgovoy)? I agree with AP above somewhere that he shouldn't have been exterminated for his views, but he was a bad apple that was living in a Ukraine that was undergoing a national renaissance of sorts, and his rhetoric crystalized all that was bad about Great Russian chauvinistic views. His Ukrainaphobic views were way over the top. C'mon Ivashaka, you must know that he specialized in anti-Shevchenko like rhet0ric, a guy that even your own grandfather held in high esteem? Not to mention a Russian superstar like Pushkin.

    https://img.sputnikimages.com/images/vol2%2Fmedia%2Foriginal%2Fold%2F260%2F77%2F2607738_hires_0%3A0%3A0%3A0_550x550_80_0_1_sputnik-2607738-tn_8c256de1c816e8f3151a3a4b9fd8f4de.jpg
    "Perhaps then the death of those who died to keep them united and on friendly terms, people such as Mozgovoy and Buzina," "United", really? With "uniters" like Buzina, who needs rabble rousers?

  404. @24th Alabama
    @Ivashka the fool

    By any objective measure Vladimir Putin is the greatest Russian leader of
    the last two hundred years, and is recognized as such by most of the world
    outside the reach of the virulent Western media.

    As far as I know he has attempted to peacefully settle every internal and
    international dispute by peaceful means, using force only as a last resort,
    as we would expect of the only remaining Christian leader of a major nation,
    excepting Italy.

    Obviously, you style yourself as a sort of a Russian insider, albeit a petulant one, so naturally I am curious about the reason for your angst if you can disclose that without revealing your identity. Surely, your beef against Vlad is not entirely due to a bias against short guys. Many men dislike tall women, a fact that has worked to the advantage of us who don't care.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Ivashka the fool

    My beef with Pynya is that he isn’t Russian and isn’t a leader. Simple enough?

    Now, about me being an insider on Russian affairs, we have a better one among us here on this forum: Dmitry is the real RF insider here. Never mind him being a Noviop, that’s as close as it gets to being Russian in most people’s understanding.

    This is due to the Russian ethnos actually dying under the brilliant guidance, and the PR glitter of Pynya the dwarf and his clique of corrupt and inept parasite underlings.

    Any other questions?

    • Replies: @silviosilver
    @Ivashka the fool

    Which country, from whatever historical period, best matches your ideal of what Russia should be (or what you wish it had become)?

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

    , @Emil Nikola Richard
    @Ivashka the fool


    Any other questions?
     
    When you were sitting in the dojo in the last few weeks did your zen master miss your shoulder with the stick and smack you in the head?


    ha ha just kidding!
    , @24th Alabama
    @Ivashka the fool

    I'm still confused about who you are and what
    you are about, but I wish you well.

    Replies: @Another Polish Perspective, @Dmitry

  405. @Ivashka the fool
    @24th Alabama

    My beef with Pynya is that he isn't Russian and isn't a leader. Simple enough?

    Now, about me being an insider on Russian affairs, we have a better one among us here on this forum: Dmitry is the real RF insider here. Never mind him being a Noviop, that's as close as it gets to being Russian in most people's understanding.

    This is due to the Russian ethnos actually dying under the brilliant guidance, and the PR glitter of Pynya the dwarf and his clique of corrupt and inept parasite underlings.

    Any other questions?

    Replies: @silviosilver, @Emil Nikola Richard, @24th Alabama

    Which country, from whatever historical period, best matches your ideal of what Russia should be (or what you wish it had become)?

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @silviosilver

    Japan under the Shogunate, when they had exterminated the Christian convert population and closed its borders with the exception of a very strictly controlled trade with the Dutch.

    https://youtu.be/cuTjBL28l0U

    Probably the best movie I watched in the last few years.

    The Japanese did the right thing, they survived as people and culture due to these cruel choices.

    Around the same period, Russians have opened the door to the West under the Romanovs, a door through which later came the ideas of Enlightenment, logically followed by the Judeo-Bolshevik scum, replaced by their Noviop offspring.

    And now, due to this fatal choices and their consequences, Russian people will most probably vanish from history, most of their unique culture already being lost as we speak. One should honor and respect one's ancestors, their ways and their beliefs for they are in him and he only lives because they lived and suffered.

    One should not follow foreign invented gods and should not lust for foreign made notions such as "progress", "equality", "freedom", but instead should value harmony and devotion to one's blood and soil. When a people betrays their ancestors, this people is bound to disappear from the history and the memories of mankind.

    This is historical justice.

    If Russia centers on itself and its tragic experience, learning from it and developing a healthy outlook on its past since times immemorial, then perhaps it could still be saved. Otherwise, it'll rot and decay as it had done for the last two generations. And one day it will crumble, never to rebuild again.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @Another Polish Perspective, @AP, @S

  406. @silviosilver
    @Ivashka the fool

    Which country, from whatever historical period, best matches your ideal of what Russia should be (or what you wish it had become)?

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

    Japan under the Shogunate, when they had exterminated the Christian convert population and closed its borders with the exception of a very strictly controlled trade with the Dutch.

    Probably the best movie I watched in the last few years.

    The Japanese did the right thing, they survived as people and culture due to these cruel choices.

    Around the same period, Russians have opened the door to the West under the Romanovs, a door through which later came the ideas of Enlightenment, logically followed by the Judeo-Bolshevik scum, replaced by their Noviop offspring.

    And now, due to this fatal choices and their consequences, Russian people will most probably vanish from history, most of their unique culture already being lost as we speak. One should honor and respect one’s ancestors, their ways and their beliefs for they are in him and he only lives because they lived and suffered.

    One should not follow foreign invented gods and should not lust for foreign made notions such as “progress”, “equality”, “freedom”, but instead should value harmony and devotion to one’s blood and soil. When a people betrays their ancestors, this people is bound to disappear from the history and the memories of mankind.

    This is historical justice.

    If Russia centers on itself and its tragic experience, learning from it and developing a healthy outlook on its past since times immemorial, then perhaps it could still be saved. Otherwise, it’ll rot and decay as it had done for the last two generations. And one day it will crumble, never to rebuild again.

    • Thanks: Sher Singh
    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @Ivashka the fool


    but instead should value harmony and devotion to one’s blood and soil.
     
    Sorry if I may seem to be tough on you this morning, but I'm curious as to whose blood and soil your own kids are devoted to (Russian, French, yet to be determined)? But when you're spouting off this sort of hardcore nationalistic trite, you should first live up to your own rhetoric. "Do as I say, not as I do" eh, Ivashka? :-(
    , @Another Polish Perspective
    @Ivashka the fool

    As you prefer the Japanese choice, you should prefer the Japanese version of "Silence" by Shinoda too (as I do).

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iEHD08V8c0c

    Personally, I can't agree with you since if you study the question of Christianity spread in Japan, it is rather clear that large parts of Japan (Kiusiu) were quite responsive to it, and yet the Japanese acculturalized their Christianity so much that many in Europe did not consider it Christianity anymore (the same in China, which also finally banned Christianity). However, doing this, the Japanese proved that their culture was living and kicking, and not in danger of disappearance.
    Persecuting Christians by Japanese feudal lords was unnecessary cruelty towards the Japanese in such a situation.
    Purity of culture is dangerously close to "purity of blood" thema.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

    , @AP
    @Ivashka the fool


    One should not follow foreign invented gods
     
    This is the problem. You have taken for granted the Soviet materialistic belief that gods are all invented and that religions are nothing but myths (this label is not meant pejoratively here); Christ was just a Jewish teacher and not the son of God. If that were the case, your approach is completely logical and honorable: choose one’s own people’s myths over those of foreigners. And if one’s own myths have been snuffed out and are no longer accessible (as was mostly the case for the Slavs), then the next best option is to adopt the myths of one’s ancestors’ cousins, that are still practiced and remembered. Such as the belief system of the Aryan Buddha. Or the Zoroastrianism of the ancient Persians. I would probably do the same, if deep down I were a materialist who thought in terms of blood and anthropology.

    But God exists and was incarnated as a Jew. He died and was resurrected. Fortunately, not only for Jews but for all of us. How we approach and make sense of this does vary by nation, the approach of your church father whom you mentioned positively before would be different in certain ways from those of an African convert or Italian theologian.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Mr. Hack

    , @S
    @Ivashka the fool


    The Japanese did the right thing, they survived as people and culture due to these cruel choices.
     
    This reminds me how there is a subtle (though also quite deliberate) aspect of many a US war, where the illigitimate children resulting from US soldier liaisons with locals were often (if not typically) left behind (ie simply abandoned as orphans) in country after the US forces departed. This creates an instant 'oppressed minority' which the US, shedding many crocodile tears, can then cynically use to divide their original host nation.

    Tens of thousands of 'Amerasian' children were abandoned in Vietnam, where they were understandably seen as alien and not accepted by the Vietnamese, after the final conclusion of the Vietnam War in 1975. The United States finally took them in after the passage of the American Homecoming Act in 1988, something it should responsibly have done in 1975, but, had they done that, these orphans couldn't have been used as leverage by the US against the Vietnamese.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Homecoming_Act

    An example of how Amerasian children were often created, this time in US occupied Korean War era postwar Japan. (This is from the 1954 movie The Bridges at Toki-Ri.)

    https://youtu.be/qbuLW4r8QKQ

    I wouldn't be so plain spoken (not harsh) about the progressive (so called) Multi-Culturalists as I am, but their being arrogant, not to mention totalitarian in mindset, makes it necessary.

    They ignore all the warning signs their ideology is false and not working, ie the destroyed US inner cities, mass Black on White rape, Black on White criminality, Jonestown, the thoroughly and utterly corrupt/morally debased present 'progressive' US government, and will violently hunt down any group who simply would like to peacably separate from them.

    Ultimately, it seems, the self declared 'progressives' intend to suicidally take everyone else down with them they possibly can into the black hole of death and destruction known as WWIII.
  407. @Mikhail
    @AP


    How about Crimea? Didn’t have a Russian majority until the Tatars were expelled after World War II.
     
    Wrong!

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Crimea

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @AP

    Since when is less than 50% majority?

    • Replies: @Mikhail
    @AP

    Tatars were never a majority in Crimea from the 1897 census to the present, in addition to not having predated the Rus Slav presence there. To simply say that the Tatars are a mix of different people in Crimea including those predating the Rus Slav presence suggestively omits that the same can be said of Rus Slavs, in addition to noting that the core group associated with the Crimean Tatars came after the Rus Slav presence.

    Replies: @AP

  408. @Ivashka the fool
    @24th Alabama

    My beef with Pynya is that he isn't Russian and isn't a leader. Simple enough?

    Now, about me being an insider on Russian affairs, we have a better one among us here on this forum: Dmitry is the real RF insider here. Never mind him being a Noviop, that's as close as it gets to being Russian in most people's understanding.

    This is due to the Russian ethnos actually dying under the brilliant guidance, and the PR glitter of Pynya the dwarf and his clique of corrupt and inept parasite underlings.

    Any other questions?

    Replies: @silviosilver, @Emil Nikola Richard, @24th Alabama

    Any other questions?

    When you were sitting in the dojo in the last few weeks did your zen master miss your shoulder with the stick and smack you in the head?

    ha ha just kidding!

  409. A123 says: • Website

    The feds are having real problems with their fake narratives. Video below MORE.

    Patriot Front-Like Characters Get Swarmed and Unmasked, Brawl Ensues.

    Benny Johnson
    ·
    This is the BEST video on the internet right now.

    – Pro-America Patriot rally ongoing
    – Feds show up dressed as “Nazis”
    – Patriots force Feds out of rally
    – Unmask the Feds, who PANIC
    – The “Nazis” cry, tremble in fear
    – Cops rush to save Feds

    WATCH

    One of the guys who was unmasked was terrified his face was going to be seen, so he covered it with his hands and then his jacket. The effort came a little too late, and folks are already trying to figure out who some of these guys are. While they’re similar in their outfit, they’re also off a bit — they don’t have the tan hats, and Patriot Front guys wear light color masks. Also, the shirts are a bit different. A local from Portland claimed that they were part of a nationalist group based in the area. Others questioned whether such groups are astroturfed, including by leftists.

    Bottom line? Whoever these characters are, some of them have been uncovered, and the search is now underway.

    The sheer desperation to stop Main Street Americans is pushing the elites into an impossible position. If the do not use corrupt tactics they lose. If they break the system they lose harder.

    PEACE 😇

    [MORE]

    https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2023/06/25/watch-patriot-front-like-characters-get-swarmed-and-unmasked-brawl-ensues-n766969

    • Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
    @A123

    The handwriting was on the wall in huge block letters starting in Charlottesville. As I remember it even the goof Richard Spencer bailed at that point. Henrik Palmgren was the saddest casualty of that foolishness. There is no excuse for any of the 6 Jan 2021 participants. They are guilty of stupidity. Solis Invictus' career ended in Charlottesville. In that one case the FBI performed a public service.

    , @QCIC
    @A123

    Looks and sounds a bit like two groups of Feds.

    Replies: @A123, @Wokechoke

  410. @A123
    The feds are having real problems with their fake narratives. Video below MORE.

    Patriot Front-Like Characters Get Swarmed and Unmasked, Brawl Ensues.

    Benny Johnson
    ·
    This is the BEST video on the internet right now.

    - Pro-America Patriot rally ongoing
    - Feds show up dressed as “Nazis”
    - Patriots force Feds out of rally
    - Unmask the Feds, who PANIC
    - The “Nazis” cry, tremble in fear
    - Cops rush to save Feds

    WATCH
     
    One of the guys who was unmasked was terrified his face was going to be seen, so he covered it with his hands and then his jacket. The effort came a little too late, and folks are already trying to figure out who some of these guys are. While they’re similar in their outfit, they’re also off a bit — they don’t have the tan hats, and Patriot Front guys wear light color masks. Also, the shirts are a bit different. A local from Portland claimed that they were part of a nationalist group based in the area. Others questioned whether such groups are astroturfed, including by leftists.

    Bottom line? Whoever these characters are, some of them have been uncovered, and the search is now underway.
     
    The sheer desperation to stop Main Street Americans is pushing the elites into an impossible position. If the do not use corrupt tactics they lose. If they break the system they lose harder.

    PEACE 😇



    https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1672981094902185986?s=20

    https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2023/06/25/watch-patriot-front-like-characters-get-swarmed-and-unmasked-brawl-ensues-n766969

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @QCIC

    The handwriting was on the wall in huge block letters starting in Charlottesville. As I remember it even the goof Richard Spencer bailed at that point. Henrik Palmgren was the saddest casualty of that foolishness. There is no excuse for any of the 6 Jan 2021 participants. They are guilty of stupidity. Solis Invictus’ career ended in Charlottesville. In that one case the FBI performed a public service.

  411. AP says:
    @Mikhail
    @Mr. XYZ


    AP might have been wrong about the specific details (though technically 49.6% isn’t a majority, but it is very close to one and a Russian majority might have been reached by 1944), but he’s right about the general picture. IIRC, Crimea still had more Tatars than Russians back in 1897. Thus, the Ottoman Empire could have theoretically lain a legitimate claim to it during WWI, especially if one would have also factored in the descendants of those Tatars who left Crimea in the 19th century and who were living in the Ottoman Empire during WWI.
     
    You'd be great on MSNBC, CNN, BBC, Sky News, et al. The 1897 census says there were around 35% Tatars to 33% Russians. The Rus Slavs were in Crimea before the Tatars. The Russian Empire academically qualifies as a successor (for lack of a better term) to Rus. Russia reunited with Crimea in reply to slave trade raids emanating from the Crimean Tatar Khanate against Slavs and others.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @AP

    The Rus Slavs were in Crimea before the Tatars

    Rus had an outpost in Crimea. The Crimean Tatars are of course descended from a mix of Tatar invaders and Greeks, Ostrogoths and others who lived there from ancient times. Saying that those people trace back only to the 13th century is as dumb as claiming that Turks in Turkey are some kind of newcomers.

    • Disagree: Mikhail
    • Replies: @Mikhail
    @AP


    Rus had an outpost in Crimea. The Crimean Tatars are of course descended from a mix of Tatar invaders and Greeks, Ostrogoths and others who lived there from ancient times. Saying that those people trace back only to the 13th century is as dumb as claiming that Turks in Turkey are some kind of newcomers.
     
    The slave trading Tatar Khanate came after (not before) the Rus Slav presence in Crimea. As noted -

    Tatars were never a majority in Crimea from the 1897 census to the present, in addition to not having predated the Rus Slav presence there. To simply say that the Tatars are a mix of different people in Crimea including those predating the Rus Slav presence suggestively omits that the same can be said of Rus Slavs, in addition to noting that the core group associated with the Crimean Tatars came after the Rus Slav presence.

    Replies: @AP

  412. @AP
    @Ivashka the fool


    Problem is, in their current state, either RusFed or Ukrostan are absolutely unworthy of dying for their preservation
     
    Again, it’s not even really about the preservation of the state or the leaders but about fighting against foreign invaders and occupiers. That’s why those 16 year old heroes did what they did.

    If China invaded and occupied parts of Russia would you denigrate the sacrifice of those who resist by saying “RusFed is unworthy of dying for?”

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Anatoly Karlin

    If China invaded and occupied parts of Russia would you denigrate the sacrifice of those who resist by saying “RusFed is unworthy of dying for?”

    Yes, I would. Under almost any such scenario, the background is that Russia became a lapdog for American neocons, e.g. in the event that Khodorkovsky types and/or White Rex take over post-Putin. Under such conditions, it would not be unreasonable for the Chinese to intervene to contain the threat.

    In light of the above, I would not want Russians to spill their blood for American neocon interests and would consider those who think otherwise to be naive idiots at best, in light of the population and GDP differential between RF and China; and I would consider those Russian leaders and activists who try to force Russians who disagree to sacrifice themselves (e.g. through conscription and border closures) to be degenerates deserving of summary extermination, and would have no compunctions about reporting their coordinates to the PLA in order to accelerate the end of the conflict.

    The optimal strategy overall would be surrender ASAP and let the W*stoids and Chinese duke it out for world hegemony. Flip sides to whoever’s winning near the end.

    • Replies: @silviosilver
    @Anatoly Karlin


    Flip sides to whoever’s winning near the end.
     
    A fairweather "nationalist" if there was ever one.

    Such an admission is fair grounds to be deported, locked up or simply executed no matter the regime, no matter the country.

    Who needs open traitors-to-be like you?

    Russians must be complete pussies if they allow you move among them without caving your fat skull in.

    Replies: @Anatoly Karlin

    , @Yahya
    @Anatoly Karlin


    In light of the above, I would not want Russians to spill their blood for American neocon interests and would consider those who think otherwise to be naive idiots at best,
     
    But what if Russia’s elite human capital deem it necessary to join the Americans in order to preserve freedom, democracy and LGBT rights in Russia?
    , @Mr. XYZ
    @Anatoly Karlin

    Out of curiosity: Do you believe that Russia was wrong to force unwilling young men to risk their lives in World War I? Should it have exclusively relied on volunteers for its war effort?

    Basically, Russia's WWI war effort faltered because Russian normies stopped understanding what they were being sacrificed for. Do you really think that Constantinople and Galicia (both places where it's highly uncertain that Imperial Russia would have won a free and fair plebiscite anyway) were actually worth millions of young Russian lives? If so, then shouldn't Russia have been capable of finding enough volunteers for the task of conquering these territories as opposed to having it rely on conscription for this purpose?

    BTW, had Russia stopped its WWI war effort before the Bolsheviks would have seized power, the Bolshevik coup would have likely been avoided, as would the subsequent Bolshevik tyranny and WWII (due to Germany possibly winning WWI, and also due to no scary Bolshevik bogeyman in the East for the Nazis to utilize in order for them to gain power in Germany in the first place).

    Replies: @Anatoly Karlin, @Wokechoke

  413. AP says:
    @LatW
    @AP

    So which map is the most accurate one when it comes to the distribution of the Ukrainian people? Meaning, any territory where Ukrainians have lived in considerable numbers, let's say, in the 19th century or the beginning of the 20th century. Not any kind of state borders, but their ethnic and linguistic space. You may have already posted a few at some point but do you have any good examples?

    There is a maximalist map such as this one (but how accurate is it?). Knowing that Ukrainians lived beyond their current borders (Kuban', Belgorod), is there an ethnic map that is accurate and shows their historical lands? I have seen the UPA map, which was larger than the current territory but, of course, that map is too "political" (although it must be based on something tangible not just nationalist aspirations).

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/5d/Map_of_Ukraine_%28postcard_1919%29.jpg

    Found this one as well (in the link):

    https://andreistp.livejournal.com/3480543.html

    Replies: @AP

    The maximalist one you show is inaccurate. It includes territory that might only have 10% Ukrainians.

    This is an accurate “maximalist” map showing “Ukrainian” populated territories from 100 or so years ago. Major caveats: a lot of these people (such as peasants in what is now Belarus) spoke what would be considered Ukrainian but were pre-nationalist and never adopted a Ukrainian national identity; others such as in what is now Russian territory got Russified before that happened. Some in the far West became Rusyns and/or think of themselves as belonging to the Lemko nation.

    Note that on this map Crimea is non-Ukrainian.

    http://ukrainianlaw.blogspot.com/2015/01/ethnographic-map-of-ukraine1949.html

  414. @Ivashka the fool
    @AP

    I actually agree with what you wrote here. Yes Crimea is originally Tatar and before them Goth (the Theodoro Goths of Mangup). And yes neither Russians, nor Ukrainians have firm historical rights on the Wild Field (Дикое поле) that became Novorossya under Catherine the Great. It was Desht e Qipchack for way longer than it was Russian and even more so than it was Ukrainian. We both know that there was no Ukraine wherever to be found (with the notable exclusion of the Polish litterati) when Potyomkin conquered and settled these lands for the Russian Imperial Crown. Now, this Crown Itself, or rather the establishment around it, was Russian in name only, it was in fact a cosmopolitan elite organized around a German princess (of distant Wendish descent) and a bunch of military leaders some of whom were of Maloross descent. And we both know what the Maloross stands for, that is not Little Russian, but more and better put as Proper Russian because the Mogyla Academy of Kiev followed the Greek/Byzantine manner of describing Rus lands and was keen on placing the onus on the Kievan lands as the original Rus (a bullshit marketing and PR self-agrandising stunt, because Old Ladoga and Novgorod were Rus before Kiev). Basically, we have different branches of Rus, more or less admixed with Vlakh, Turk and Finn, killing each other for no good reason at all on the lands that their ancestors conquered together when they were united. These lands were theirs only because they were united. Now that they become crazy enough to kill each other, in all justice they should lose the control of these lands. The Quipchack were Turkic, alright then let the Turks take back what their ancestors had, the Slavs have shown the whole world how imbecile they are when they are not ruled and administered by the North-Western European Wends/Balts/Vikings/Germans. Let the Turkic peoples thrive where their Scythian ancestors roamed the Steppe. The Turks are less unhinged and are perhaps more capable of unity. And yeah, as the Abrahamic religions go, Islam had a better track record of Empire-building than Orthodox Christianity does. So given that they have betrayed the Old Faith of their ancestors long ago, let them end up Muslims which is the ultimate dead end of any population that has piled betrayal upon betrayal. That would be historical justice, that would be по понятиям. Perhaps then the death of those who died to keep them united and on friendly terms, people such as Mozgovoy and Buzina, Maloross both of them, would be avenged and some balance would be restored in this crazy world of ours.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

    Perhaps then the death of those who died to keep them united and on friendly terms, people such as Mozgovoy and Buzina, Maloross both of them, would be avenged and some balance would be restored in this crazy world of ours.

    What’s with your campaign to avenge the death of Buzina all about anyway (I’m not familiar with Mozgovoy)? I agree with AP above somewhere that he shouldn’t have been exterminated for his views, but he was a bad apple that was living in a Ukraine that was undergoing a national renaissance of sorts, and his rhetoric crystalized all that was bad about Great Russian chauvinistic views. His Ukrainaphobic views were way over the top. C’mon Ivashaka, you must know that he specialized in anti-Shevchenko like rhet0ric, a guy that even your own grandfather held in high esteem? Not to mention a Russian superstar like Pushkin.

    “Perhaps then the death of those who died to keep them united and on friendly terms, people such as Mozgovoy and Buzina,” “United”, really? With “uniters” like Buzina, who needs rabble rousers?

  415. @Ivashka the fool
    @silviosilver

    Japan under the Shogunate, when they had exterminated the Christian convert population and closed its borders with the exception of a very strictly controlled trade with the Dutch.

    https://youtu.be/cuTjBL28l0U

    Probably the best movie I watched in the last few years.

    The Japanese did the right thing, they survived as people and culture due to these cruel choices.

    Around the same period, Russians have opened the door to the West under the Romanovs, a door through which later came the ideas of Enlightenment, logically followed by the Judeo-Bolshevik scum, replaced by their Noviop offspring.

    And now, due to this fatal choices and their consequences, Russian people will most probably vanish from history, most of their unique culture already being lost as we speak. One should honor and respect one's ancestors, their ways and their beliefs for they are in him and he only lives because they lived and suffered.

    One should not follow foreign invented gods and should not lust for foreign made notions such as "progress", "equality", "freedom", but instead should value harmony and devotion to one's blood and soil. When a people betrays their ancestors, this people is bound to disappear from the history and the memories of mankind.

    This is historical justice.

    If Russia centers on itself and its tragic experience, learning from it and developing a healthy outlook on its past since times immemorial, then perhaps it could still be saved. Otherwise, it'll rot and decay as it had done for the last two generations. And one day it will crumble, never to rebuild again.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @Another Polish Perspective, @AP, @S

    but instead should value harmony and devotion to one’s blood and soil.

    Sorry if I may seem to be tough on you this morning, but I’m curious as to whose blood and soil your own kids are devoted to (Russian, French, yet to be determined)? But when you’re spouting off this sort of hardcore nationalistic trite, you should first live up to your own rhetoric. “Do as I say, not as I do” eh, Ivashka? 🙁

  416. @Ivashka the fool
    @silviosilver

    Japan under the Shogunate, when they had exterminated the Christian convert population and closed its borders with the exception of a very strictly controlled trade with the Dutch.

    https://youtu.be/cuTjBL28l0U

    Probably the best movie I watched in the last few years.

    The Japanese did the right thing, they survived as people and culture due to these cruel choices.

    Around the same period, Russians have opened the door to the West under the Romanovs, a door through which later came the ideas of Enlightenment, logically followed by the Judeo-Bolshevik scum, replaced by their Noviop offspring.

    And now, due to this fatal choices and their consequences, Russian people will most probably vanish from history, most of their unique culture already being lost as we speak. One should honor and respect one's ancestors, their ways and their beliefs for they are in him and he only lives because they lived and suffered.

    One should not follow foreign invented gods and should not lust for foreign made notions such as "progress", "equality", "freedom", but instead should value harmony and devotion to one's blood and soil. When a people betrays their ancestors, this people is bound to disappear from the history and the memories of mankind.

    This is historical justice.

    If Russia centers on itself and its tragic experience, learning from it and developing a healthy outlook on its past since times immemorial, then perhaps it could still be saved. Otherwise, it'll rot and decay as it had done for the last two generations. And one day it will crumble, never to rebuild again.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @Another Polish Perspective, @AP, @S

    As you prefer the Japanese choice, you should prefer the Japanese version of “Silence” by Shinoda too (as I do).

    Personally, I can’t agree with you since if you study the question of Christianity spread in Japan, it is rather clear that large parts of Japan (Kiusiu) were quite responsive to it, and yet the Japanese acculturalized their Christianity so much that many in Europe did not consider it Christianity anymore (the same in China, which also finally banned Christianity). However, doing this, the Japanese proved that their culture was living and kicking, and not in danger of disappearance.
    Persecuting Christians by Japanese feudal lords was unnecessary cruelty towards the Japanese in such a situation.
    Purity of culture is dangerously close to “purity of blood” thema.

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @Another Polish Perspective

    What would have happened in Japan if accepting Christianity (Latin rite Catholicism to be more specific) would have been what unfortunately happened in ancient Rus during its (protracted) conversion. In Rus, the Christianisation took a dozen generations at least, probably more.

    People had Christian names given to them at the baptism, but they also had Slavic nicknames that they used on a dayly basis. They went to church on holidays, but still told pagan byliny in which Ilya Muromets shots down the crosses from atop the Kievan churches. If vityazi warriors going to battle, met with a (chernets) monk, then it was seen as a bad omen, and they even sometimes killed the poor man outright to conjure the evil spell. The anonymous bard who composed the The Tale of the Igor's Campaign, writing in the late twelve century, wrote a pagan poem citing Old Gods and claiming that the Rus were their children. That was 200 years after Vladimir the Khazar maiden's son betrayal of his heroic father's Faith.

    It was only after the Mongol conquest, due to the genocide that was unleashed on southern Rus, and to the protection the Mongols awarded to the Church (the Mongols forbade aggression and plunder of the Church domains and exempted it from paying taxes) that Christianity ultimately completely prevailed against paganism in the popular Rus masses. But even then the resulting Russian Orthodoxy was different from the Greek Byzantine faith and the Greeks were often described as hypocrite and crafty.

    The Russian version was more Nordic, way more open minded towards the other religions, and way less obsessed with worldly wealth and power. It's greatest representatives, such as Sergius of Radonezh, were not afraid to work hard themselves with their own hands building their own monasteries in remote wilderness (that's where the Russian name for a large monastery - pustyn' comes from) instead of building it as close as possible to a market as they did in Western Europe at the time. The monasteries also had battle ready monk units, the famous black hundreds, in case of Tatar, Cheremiss or Lithuanian attacks. Monks in these units seem to have been known by their pagan names, such as Peresvet and Oslyabya brothers who Sergius sent along the Prince Dmitry to battle the Mamai's Tatar troops, their Genoan mercenaries and their Lithuanian allies who luckily arrived too late for the battle, turned around and went back to the Rus lands that they have already submitted due to their elites being cowards seduced by the Latin Church.

    Only when the Czar Aleksey Mikhailovich brought the Raskol ruin upon the Russian lands, had the spiritual backbone of the nation been broken but it still unfortunately happened despite the sacrifice of the best among the nobility and the clergy. And the Jesuit educated Greek and Maloross popes were at the forefront of the religious reforms, instilling their poison in the Russian society. A poison that helped Peter the Great turning Russians into the same enserfed bydlo that Maloross, Ruthenian and Polish peasants have been turned into centuries before with the warm blessing of the Latin Church.

    The Japanese would have ended the same, despite all their exceptional character - slaves in their own lands, their traditions trampled, their spirit distorted and erased. This is what happens with those who betray their ancestors, the Japanese didn't betray theirs, that is why their land is still the Land of the Rising Sun. They did the right thing stomping the Jesuit vermin.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @Another Polish Perspective

  417. @Anatoly Karlin
    @AP


    If China invaded and occupied parts of Russia would you denigrate the sacrifice of those who resist by saying “RusFed is unworthy of dying for?”
     
    Yes, I would. Under almost any such scenario, the background is that Russia became a lapdog for American neocons, e.g. in the event that Khodorkovsky types and/or White Rex take over post-Putin. Under such conditions, it would not be unreasonable for the Chinese to intervene to contain the threat.

    In light of the above, I would not want Russians to spill their blood for American neocon interests and would consider those who think otherwise to be naive idiots at best, in light of the population and GDP differential between RF and China; and I would consider those Russian leaders and activists who try to force Russians who disagree to sacrifice themselves (e.g. through conscription and border closures) to be degenerates deserving of summary extermination, and would have no compunctions about reporting their coordinates to the PLA in order to accelerate the end of the conflict.

    The optimal strategy overall would be surrender ASAP and let the W*stoids and Chinese duke it out for world hegemony. Flip sides to whoever's winning near the end.

    Replies: @silviosilver, @Yahya, @Mr. XYZ

    Flip sides to whoever’s winning near the end.

    A fairweather “nationalist” if there was ever one.

    Such an admission is fair grounds to be deported, locked up or simply executed no matter the regime, no matter the country.

    Who needs open traitors-to-be like you?

    Russians must be complete pussies if they allow you move among them without caving your fat skull in.

    • Replies: @Anatoly Karlin
    @silviosilver

    Oooo the r*ghtoid's seething.

    Replies: @silviosilver

  418. @A123
    The feds are having real problems with their fake narratives. Video below MORE.

    Patriot Front-Like Characters Get Swarmed and Unmasked, Brawl Ensues.

    Benny Johnson
    ·
    This is the BEST video on the internet right now.

    - Pro-America Patriot rally ongoing
    - Feds show up dressed as “Nazis”
    - Patriots force Feds out of rally
    - Unmask the Feds, who PANIC
    - The “Nazis” cry, tremble in fear
    - Cops rush to save Feds

    WATCH
     
    One of the guys who was unmasked was terrified his face was going to be seen, so he covered it with his hands and then his jacket. The effort came a little too late, and folks are already trying to figure out who some of these guys are. While they’re similar in their outfit, they’re also off a bit — they don’t have the tan hats, and Patriot Front guys wear light color masks. Also, the shirts are a bit different. A local from Portland claimed that they were part of a nationalist group based in the area. Others questioned whether such groups are astroturfed, including by leftists.

    Bottom line? Whoever these characters are, some of them have been uncovered, and the search is now underway.
     
    The sheer desperation to stop Main Street Americans is pushing the elites into an impossible position. If the do not use corrupt tactics they lose. If they break the system they lose harder.

    PEACE 😇



    https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1672981094902185986?s=20

    https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2023/06/25/watch-patriot-front-like-characters-get-swarmed-and-unmasked-brawl-ensues-n766969

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @QCIC

    Looks and sounds a bit like two groups of Feds.

    • Replies: @A123
    @QCIC

    If you think loud f-bombing red necks sound like Feds, you are badly confused about the reality of America.

    One of the unmasked is likely identified... Antifa & student at UC Riverside. So not Feds, but other SJW scum.

    Unmasking infiltrators so they can be doxxed is is an excellent tactic. I expect it will become much more common. Traitors like FBI and Antifa need anonymity to operate.

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @QCIC

    , @Wokechoke
    @QCIC

    Two groups of people blinded in one eye already. I refered to this video in a post earlier.


    Clueless but well meaning flag waving patriotards v callow college boys who've had enough time to research the root problem but still think anything to be done.

    One poster called Benny Johnson cackling about the divided goys.

  419. @silviosilver
    @Anatoly Karlin


    Flip sides to whoever’s winning near the end.
     
    A fairweather "nationalist" if there was ever one.

    Such an admission is fair grounds to be deported, locked up or simply executed no matter the regime, no matter the country.

    Who needs open traitors-to-be like you?

    Russians must be complete pussies if they allow you move among them without caving your fat skull in.

    Replies: @Anatoly Karlin

    Oooo the r*ghtoid’s seething.

    • Replies: @silviosilver
    @Anatoly Karlin

    "EHC, I pledge my life to thee."

    PS - Traitors have been considered the lowest of scum since time immemorial. You won't be walking this one back.

    Replies: @Anatoly Karlin

  420. @Yevardian
    @Beckow

    The very public ovation Wagner received whilst leaving Rostov seems to imply otherwise.

    No defender of Prigozhin here, but Shoigu is worse.

    Replies: @Beckow, @Gerard1234

    The small ovation suggests more-nationalist sympathies than the current Putin’s policies – if anything, it was a scream to go bloody-all-the-way

    How does that hurt Putin when he is fighting a war? It also reaffirms the Russian normies’ sense that Putin represents the moderate option – maybe 80-90% of the population. Being between pro-Nato liberals and the fuming, hot-headed nationalists is not a bad place when fighting a war. I suspect it was stage-managed, or at least encouraged and tolerated by Kremlin.

    AK has climbed up somewhere where the liberals and the radical always frustrated nationalists meet, a lonely place quite appropriate for a libertarian-leaning non-family eternal outsider. Or should I say, descended down there…it is an irrelevant place.

    • Replies: @QCIC
    @Beckow

    Rostov-on-Don is is roughly 50 miles from the Ukrainian border. Close to Mariupol and the Azovstal Western base. They have been close to ground zero for a long time and probably have been accepting a continuous stream of refugees since 2015. I think many residents would cheer Wagner guys independently of all other political concerns.

    Numerous people in this large city probably have first hand knowledge of NeoNAZI atrocities, so hell yeah, they probably want the military to go in hard. There are probably some big fans of the scorched-earth approach.

  421. A123 says: • Website
    @QCIC
    @A123

    Looks and sounds a bit like two groups of Feds.

    Replies: @A123, @Wokechoke

    If you think loud f-bombing red necks sound like Feds, you are badly confused about the reality of America.

    One of the unmasked is likely identified… Antifa & student at UC Riverside. So not Feds, but other SJW scum.

    Unmasking infiltrators so they can be doxxed is is an excellent tactic. I expect it will become much more common. Traitors like FBI and Antifa need anonymity to operate.

    PEACE 😇

    • Replies: @QCIC
    @A123

    I think I saw a 'Proud Boys' shirt on one of the good guys. Last I heard they were thought to be Feds.

    Replies: @A123

  422. @Anatoly Karlin
    @silviosilver

    Oooo the r*ghtoid's seething.

    Replies: @silviosilver

    “EHC, I pledge my life to thee.”

    PS – Traitors have been considered the lowest of scum since time immemorial. You won’t be walking this one back.

    • Replies: @Anatoly Karlin
    @silviosilver

    I am looking forwards to American neocons utilizing r*ghtoid subhumans like yourself in the war against China.

    I'd just prefer that demographic doesn't include many Russians.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

  423. @AP
    @Beckow


    “There’s a difference between fighting the occupiers and being one.”

    Who is the occupier in Donbas? If the population is Russian, speaks Russian and wants friendship with Russia…are they “occupying” themselves?
     
    As I said, I oppose invading and occupying places such as Crimea or Donetsk city.

    Zaporizhia is not those areas.

    Would you want your relatives to die to make sure that those Russians are expelled, killed or forcefully assimilated? Because that is what Kiev is doing today
     
    Kiev is fighting Russian invaders. Those 16 year old boys did not fight to conquer Crimea but died in battle against occupiers of their home.

    In territories that were for hundreds of years majority Russian
     
    Now you are just back to your usual lying. Crimea was not majority Russian until 1945.

    I would remind you that the first law passed after Maidan in February 2014 was to abolish Russian as a regional second language – in a country where half the population are native Russian speakers
     
    And a large percentage of those Russian speakers, and majority of Ukraine’s population, supported that. It was repealing a law passed by a fake parliament and unpopular president in 2011. Repealing it returned Ukraine to the status quo of 1991-2011.

    And then they murdered 50 Russians in Odessa
     
    Repeating your lie again, of course.

    Replies: @Beckow

    Ukie nationalists burnt to death 49 Russians in Odessa in May 2014 – right a at the beginning. A true event that was celebrated by the likes of you and in Kiev. Imagine if the Spanish nationalists burnt to death 50 Catalans and Madrid would celebrate. Imagine what any other country would do. You are right – it was technically only 49. I will give in to you autistic non-defense of a crime.

    Those 16 year old boys did not fight to conquer Crimea but died in battle against occupiers of their home.

    They are dying in Donbas and the south-east saying they will go all the way to Crimea-Donbas City. Wars are complicated, but we need to observe them as they are and listen to what people say: Kiev says they will reconquer all Russian speaking territories. The soldiers know it and they know what they are dying for. If Kiev takes Donbas they will they kill-and-expel millions of Russians living there who chose not to a part of Ukraine.

    And a large percentage of those Russian speakers, and majority of Ukraine’s population, supported that.

    No they didn’t – a few years later 70% of Ukraine voted for Zelko when he promised peace and rights for the Russian speakers. Of course, then he betrayed them.

    It also makes no difference if some members of the Russian minority under pressure of war or out of fear say in public that “we don’t need any language rights or schools” – that is irrelevant: in Europe these minority rights are a given.

    If you surveyed the Poles left in Germany in the middle of WW2 they would also noisily claim that “we don’t need any Polish rights, we are actually Silesian-Germans”, or whatever. Same in Czechia, they even managed to get half a million Czechs to demonstrate the eternal loyalty to Germany after the Heydrich assassination – and the unit wiping out Lidice as a reprisal was led by Czechs who overnight became Germans.

    Wars are like that, people try to survive or ingratiate themselves to the local power.

    • Replies: @AP
    @Beckow


    Ukie nationalists burnt to death 49 Russians in Odessa in May 2014
     
    You just keep lying. The number is wrong, and you lie by omission by ignoring preceding events:

    - Several days earlier, Russian mobs violently took the streets of Donetsk.

    - On that day in Odessa, violent Russian mobs attacked a pro-Ukrainian mob for the purpose of capturing Odessa, as had been done in Donetsk. First person killed was a pro -Ukrainian.

    - Odessa is not Donetsk. The pro-Russian mob that started the violence and the killing was defeated and driven back to its headquarters.

    The deaths in the building by a fire that started when both sides were throwing Molotov cocktails at each other was a tragedy but the fact that the violent pro-Russian mob failed to seize Odessa was a good thing.

    Compounding the tragedy, Russian propagandists lied about if as you do, creating a fake story of a deliberate massacre initiated by the Ukrainians, coming to your town. This fake story was helpful in creating the conditions for the civil war/Russian invasion that followed, and that killed orders of magnitude more people (mostly Russian-speakers) than died in Odessa.


    Kiev says they will reconquer all Russian speaking territories
     
    I hope it doesn’t, but after Russia invaded Ukraine, Ukraine has a right to.

    If Kiev takes Donbas they will they kill-and-expel millions of Russians living there who chose not to a part of Ukraine
     
    Like Czechs did to the Sudeten Germans? Doubtful. More likely is that the hardcore Russian nationalists will leave but many of the rest will just get by.

    “And a large percentage of those Russian speakers, and majority of Ukraine’s population, supported that.”

    No they didn’t – a few years later 70% of Ukraine voted for Zelko when he promised peace and rights for the Russian speakers
     

    You think that this is why most Galicians and most Kievans voted for Zelensky? Don’t lie.

    In the first round the candidates that actually did want to have Russian as a regional language (Boyko and Vilkul) only got 16% of the vote altogether. BRW Vilkul is involved in the fight against Russia now.

    Polls consistently show that the majority of Russian speakers in Ukraine support having Ukrainian as the only state language. Now, prior to 2014 it had it been a majority, but it is now.


    It also makes no difference if some members of the Russian minority under pressure of war or out of fear say in public that “we don’t need any language rights or schools” – that is irrelevant: in Europe these minority rights are a given
     
    1. In some of Europe. Not in France. Not in the Baltics.

    2. It is not given against the wishes of the minority itself, is it?


    If you surveyed the Poles left in Germany in the middle of WW2 they would also noisily claim that “we don’t need any Polish rights, we are actually Silesian-Germans”, or whatever

     

    A lie if applied to most Poles.

    in Czechia, they even managed to get half a million Czechs to demonstrate the eternal loyalty to Germany after the Heydrich assassination – and the unit wiping out Lidice as a reprisal was led by Czechs who overnight became
     
    Poles, Ukrainians and Russians are not Czechs or Slovaks. Though we can not trust your words that what you claim about Czechs is even true.

    Wars are like that, people try to survive or ingratiate themselves to the local power.
     
    Confession of Beckow, the eternal lackey. Those 16 year old heroes in occupied Zaporizhia were not like that.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

  424. @silviosilver
    @Anatoly Karlin

    "EHC, I pledge my life to thee."

    PS - Traitors have been considered the lowest of scum since time immemorial. You won't be walking this one back.

    Replies: @Anatoly Karlin

    I am looking forwards to American neocons utilizing r*ghtoid subhumans like yourself in the war against China.

    I’d just prefer that demographic doesn’t include many Russians.

    • Agree: Ivashka the fool, Sher Singh
    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @Anatoly Karlin

    You're absolutely correct that Russia has no business fighting against China. This is why I strongly suspect that Western efforts to turn Russia against China are doomed to fail: Simply because Russia has little to gain from such efforts. However, I also think that Russia had no business invading Ukraine in 2022 or fighting WWI for that matter, especially considering that the potential gains from that war were not worth millions of dead young Russians even in the event of victory.

    As a side note, do you think that Putin would have accepted a deal where the West would have accepted his December 2021 ultimatum in its entirety in exchange for Putin withdrawing from the SCO, ending all Russian military cooperation with China, and promising in writing to launch a trade embargo against China in the event that China will ever attack Taiwan? Frankly, I strongly doubt it because Putin would have suspected that he can have both Ukraine and close ties with China and thus wouldn't need to choose between the two of them. This is also why I suspect that Vivek Rawasmany's plan to separate Russia from China is unlikely to work.

    BTW, do you think that Serbia should have immediately surrendered in 1914 in order to save lives? And ditto for Poland in 1939? (Polish resistance did not prevent the overwhelming majority of Polish Jews from getting murdered for the Nazis and only made things worse for the ethnic Poles; had Poland quickly surrendered, there's a very real chance that ethnic Poles would have gotten the Czech treatment, though Polish Jews would have of course still been fucked. Though a considerably larger percentage of Polish Jews could have potentially been saved had Poland outright allied with Nazi Germany rather than merely quickly surrendering to Nazi Germany. Pre-1944 Hungary's, Romania's, and Bulgaria's Jews all fared much better relative to Poland's Jews, after all.)

    Also, shouldn't small countries such as the Baltic countries quickly surrender in the event of a hypothetical Russian invasion and instead wait for NATO to liberate them? Isn't that the most optimal strategy for them? (France's unintentional move to lose quickly in 1940 ensured that WWII would not hit it anywhere near as hard as it would hit both Germany and the Soviet Union, while still ensuring that France would be an official winner of WWII at the very end thanks to De Gaulle's Free French Forces.) Interestingly enough, had Ukraine actually been a part of NATO, which Russia strongly didn't want, then Ukraine could have actually afforded the strategy of surrendering quickly since NATO would have subsequently liberated it from Russia. But Ukraine unfortunately did and does not have that kind of luxury like the Baltic countries have.

    Replies: @Wokechoke

  425. AP says:
    @Ivashka the fool
    @silviosilver

    Japan under the Shogunate, when they had exterminated the Christian convert population and closed its borders with the exception of a very strictly controlled trade with the Dutch.

    https://youtu.be/cuTjBL28l0U

    Probably the best movie I watched in the last few years.

    The Japanese did the right thing, they survived as people and culture due to these cruel choices.

    Around the same period, Russians have opened the door to the West under the Romanovs, a door through which later came the ideas of Enlightenment, logically followed by the Judeo-Bolshevik scum, replaced by their Noviop offspring.

    And now, due to this fatal choices and their consequences, Russian people will most probably vanish from history, most of their unique culture already being lost as we speak. One should honor and respect one's ancestors, their ways and their beliefs for they are in him and he only lives because they lived and suffered.

    One should not follow foreign invented gods and should not lust for foreign made notions such as "progress", "equality", "freedom", but instead should value harmony and devotion to one's blood and soil. When a people betrays their ancestors, this people is bound to disappear from the history and the memories of mankind.

    This is historical justice.

    If Russia centers on itself and its tragic experience, learning from it and developing a healthy outlook on its past since times immemorial, then perhaps it could still be saved. Otherwise, it'll rot and decay as it had done for the last two generations. And one day it will crumble, never to rebuild again.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @Another Polish Perspective, @AP, @S

    One should not follow foreign invented gods

    This is the problem. You have taken for granted the Soviet materialistic belief that gods are all invented and that religions are nothing but myths (this label is not meant pejoratively here); Christ was just a Jewish teacher and not the son of God. If that were the case, your approach is completely logical and honorable: choose one’s own people’s myths over those of foreigners. And if one’s own myths have been snuffed out and are no longer accessible (as was mostly the case for the Slavs), then the next best option is to adopt the myths of one’s ancestors’ cousins, that are still practiced and remembered. Such as the belief system of the Aryan Buddha. Or the Zoroastrianism of the ancient Persians. I would probably do the same, if deep down I were a materialist who thought in terms of blood and anthropology.

    But God exists and was incarnated as a Jew. He died and was resurrected. Fortunately, not only for Jews but for all of us. How we approach and make sense of this does vary by nation, the approach of your church father whom you mentioned positively before would be different in certain ways from those of an African convert or Italian theologian.

    • Thanks: Mr. Hack
    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @AP

    I am as far as it gets from being a materialist. Quite the opposite to materialism, I believe that the Reality is actually made of active and structured information - Logos. There is no doubt that our Lord Jesus was the Logos, but so was Svyatovit or the Buddha or the neighbor next door and his dog. We all are the Logos at the deepest of our minds. It cannot be otherwise.

    Inside this Ocean of causal active information, the Gods of our ancestors were the Attractors around which the information that was historically specific to our people organized. Once erased, our people started being erased too. That is why Rusyns accepted the infamous name of Ukrainians (border-dwellers) instead of sticking with the name of their Ros/Rus forefathers (Rho being the root for Light in PIE).

    There is no more spiritual vitality left in the souls of the Slavs, they are attracted to any other strong Attractor that is found nearby. Yesterday it was Christianity, today it is the Jew-EU/Jew-US Globalism, tomorrow it would be Islam, which is the spiritual Black Hole of total submission to the Demiurge.

    Those who still hold to anything Aryan among us, or still have the blessings to have access to the remnants of their Old Faith, are the ones who truly represent what is left of what we were supposed to be. Those who are still not completely erased and reformed into the global Abrahamic spiritual play doh that the Demiurge can model into anything he wishes.

    Those are our people.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @AP

    , @Mr. Hack
    @AP

    It's nice to hear some straight talk on the subject matter.


    14 “You are the light of the world. A town built on a hill cannot be hidden. 15 Neither do people light a lamp and put it under a bowl. Instead they put it on its stand, and it gives light to everyone in the house. 16 In the same way, let your light shine before others, that they may see your good deeds and glorify your Father in heaven.
     
    Matthew 5:14-1

    http://www.christiancomicsinternational.org/graphics/griffin_graphics/closer_walk.jpg
  426. @Another Polish Perspective
    @Ivashka the fool

    As you prefer the Japanese choice, you should prefer the Japanese version of "Silence" by Shinoda too (as I do).

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iEHD08V8c0c

    Personally, I can't agree with you since if you study the question of Christianity spread in Japan, it is rather clear that large parts of Japan (Kiusiu) were quite responsive to it, and yet the Japanese acculturalized their Christianity so much that many in Europe did not consider it Christianity anymore (the same in China, which also finally banned Christianity). However, doing this, the Japanese proved that their culture was living and kicking, and not in danger of disappearance.
    Persecuting Christians by Japanese feudal lords was unnecessary cruelty towards the Japanese in such a situation.
    Purity of culture is dangerously close to "purity of blood" thema.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

    What would have happened in Japan if accepting Christianity (Latin rite Catholicism to be more specific) would have been what unfortunately happened in ancient Rus during its (protracted) conversion. In Rus, the Christianisation took a dozen generations at least, probably more.

    People had Christian names given to them at the baptism, but they also had Slavic nicknames that they used on a dayly basis. They went to church on holidays, but still told pagan byliny in which Ilya Muromets shots down the crosses from atop the Kievan churches. If vityazi warriors going to battle, met with a (chernets) monk, then it was seen as a bad omen, and they even sometimes killed the poor man outright to conjure the evil spell. The anonymous bard who composed the The Tale of the Igor’s Campaign, writing in the late twelve century, wrote a pagan poem citing Old Gods and claiming that the Rus were their children. That was 200 years after Vladimir the Khazar maiden’s son betrayal of his heroic father’s Faith.

    It was only after the Mongol conquest, due to the genocide that was unleashed on southern Rus, and to the protection the Mongols awarded to the Church (the Mongols forbade aggression and plunder of the Church domains and exempted it from paying taxes) that Christianity ultimately completely prevailed against paganism in the popular Rus masses. But even then the resulting Russian Orthodoxy was different from the Greek Byzantine faith and the Greeks were often described as hypocrite and crafty.

    The Russian version was more Nordic, way more open minded towards the other religions, and way less obsessed with worldly wealth and power. It’s greatest representatives, such as Sergius of Radonezh, were not afraid to work hard themselves with their own hands building their own monasteries in remote wilderness (that’s where the Russian name for a large monastery – pustyn’ comes from) instead of building it as close as possible to a market as they did in Western Europe at the time. The monasteries also had battle ready monk units, the famous black hundreds, in case of Tatar, Cheremiss or Lithuanian attacks. Monks in these units seem to have been known by their pagan names, such as Peresvet and Oslyabya brothers who Sergius sent along the Prince Dmitry to battle the Mamai’s Tatar troops, their Genoan mercenaries and their Lithuanian allies who luckily arrived too late for the battle, turned around and went back to the Rus lands that they have already submitted due to their elites being cowards seduced by the Latin Church.

    Only when the Czar Aleksey Mikhailovich brought the Raskol ruin upon the Russian lands, had the spiritual backbone of the nation been broken but it still unfortunately happened despite the sacrifice of the best among the nobility and the clergy. And the Jesuit educated Greek and Maloross popes were at the forefront of the religious reforms, instilling their poison in the Russian society. A poison that helped Peter the Great turning Russians into the same enserfed bydlo that Maloross, Ruthenian and Polish peasants have been turned into centuries before with the warm blessing of the Latin Church.

    The Japanese would have ended the same, despite all their exceptional character – slaves in their own lands, their traditions trampled, their spirit distorted and erased. This is what happens with those who betray their ancestors, the Japanese didn’t betray theirs, that is why their land is still the Land of the Rising Sun. They did the right thing stomping the Jesuit vermin.

    • Thanks: Mr. Hack
    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @Ivashka the fool

    I wish that I had the time to unravel every little Crook and Nanny that you unveil here, but I'm still grateful for the abridged version (such deep thought). I'm not up to the task of either agreeing or disagreeing with much of anything that you've written here, but I appreciate your fervor. :-)

    , @Another Polish Perspective
    @Ivashka the fool


    What would have happened in Japan if accepting Christianity (Latin rite Catholicism to be more specific) would have been what unfortunately happened in ancient Rus during its (protracted) conversion.
     
    Oh, I have forgotten for a moment your Russian ideas about corrupting character of Latin Christianity.
    But wait, there would be another choice... hypocrisy.
    The phenomenon of marranos, always suspected of crypto-Judaism and religious hypocrisy, is a good counterexample to your notion of overpowering, corrupting nature of Christianity as the phenomenon reportedly lasted until 19th century and probably was ended not by Inquisition but by appearance of other ways to express their identity (as the Sephardi Jewish community, unlike the Ashkenazi one, has never developed any forms of extreme piety like Chasidism).

    The most probable outcome for successfully Christianized Japan would be a very particular form of national Christianity, which would join the ranks of Catholicism along other so called national versions of Catholic Christianity like Maronites, or maybe even would become Church in its own right like the Armenian Apostolic Church.

    Let us also not forget that Jesuits were suspected of state-building ambitions not just in Nagasaki in Japan, but also by the Portuguese crown in Brazil and the Spanish crown in Paraguay. As our sources to Christian persecutions in Japan are mainly Jesuit ones, we cannot objectively judge what role such ambitions could play in their relationships with Japanese daimos.

  427. AP says:
    @Beckow
    @AP

    Ukie nationalists burnt to death 49 Russians in Odessa in May 2014 - right a at the beginning. A true event that was celebrated by the likes of you and in Kiev. Imagine if the Spanish nationalists burnt to death 50 Catalans and Madrid would celebrate. Imagine what any other country would do. You are right - it was technically only 49. I will give in to you autistic non-defense of a crime.


    Those 16 year old boys did not fight to conquer Crimea but died in battle against occupiers of their home.
     
    They are dying in Donbas and the south-east saying they will go all the way to Crimea-Donbas City. Wars are complicated, but we need to observe them as they are and listen to what people say: Kiev says they will reconquer all Russian speaking territories. The soldiers know it and they know what they are dying for. If Kiev takes Donbas they will they kill-and-expel millions of Russians living there who chose not to a part of Ukraine.

    And a large percentage of those Russian speakers, and majority of Ukraine’s population, supported that.
     
    No they didn't - a few years later 70% of Ukraine voted for Zelko when he promised peace and rights for the Russian speakers. Of course, then he betrayed them.

    It also makes no difference if some members of the Russian minority under pressure of war or out of fear say in public that "we don't need any language rights or schools" - that is irrelevant: in Europe these minority rights are a given.

    If you surveyed the Poles left in Germany in the middle of WW2 they would also noisily claim that "we don't need any Polish rights, we are actually Silesian-Germans", or whatever. Same in Czechia, they even managed to get half a million Czechs to demonstrate the eternal loyalty to Germany after the Heydrich assassination - and the unit wiping out Lidice as a reprisal was led by Czechs who overnight became Germans.

    Wars are like that, people try to survive or ingratiate themselves to the local power.

    Replies: @AP

    Ukie nationalists burnt to death 49 Russians in Odessa in May 2014

    You just keep lying. The number is wrong, and you lie by omission by ignoring preceding events:

    – Several days earlier, Russian mobs violently took the streets of Donetsk.

    – On that day in Odessa, violent Russian mobs attacked a pro-Ukrainian mob for the purpose of capturing Odessa, as had been done in Donetsk. First person killed was a pro -Ukrainian.

    – Odessa is not Donetsk. The pro-Russian mob that started the violence and the killing was defeated and driven back to its headquarters.

    The deaths in the building by a fire that started when both sides were throwing Molotov cocktails at each other was a tragedy but the fact that the violent pro-Russian mob failed to seize Odessa was a good thing.

    Compounding the tragedy, Russian propagandists lied about if as you do, creating a fake story of a deliberate massacre initiated by the Ukrainians, coming to your town. This fake story was helpful in creating the conditions for the civil war/Russian invasion that followed, and that killed orders of magnitude more people (mostly Russian-speakers) than died in Odessa.

    Kiev says they will reconquer all Russian speaking territories

    I hope it doesn’t, but after Russia invaded Ukraine, Ukraine has a right to.

    If Kiev takes Donbas they will they kill-and-expel millions of Russians living there who chose not to a part of Ukraine

    Like Czechs did to the Sudeten Germans? Doubtful. More likely is that the hardcore Russian nationalists will leave but many of the rest will just get by.

    “And a large percentage of those Russian speakers, and majority of Ukraine’s population, supported that.”

    No they didn’t – a few years later 70% of Ukraine voted for Zelko when he promised peace and rights for the Russian speakers

    You think that this is why most Galicians and most Kievans voted for Zelensky? Don’t lie.

    In the first round the candidates that actually did want to have Russian as a regional language (Boyko and Vilkul) only got 16% of the vote altogether. BRW Vilkul is involved in the fight against Russia now.

    Polls consistently show that the majority of Russian speakers in Ukraine support having Ukrainian as the only state language. Now, prior to 2014 it had it been a majority, but it is now.

    It also makes no difference if some members of the Russian minority under pressure of war or out of fear say in public that “we don’t need any language rights or schools” – that is irrelevant: in Europe these minority rights are a given

    1. In some of Europe. Not in France. Not in the Baltics.

    2. It is not given against the wishes of the minority itself, is it?

    If you surveyed the Poles left in Germany in the middle of WW2 they would also noisily claim that “we don’t need any Polish rights, we are actually Silesian-Germans”, or whatever

    A lie if applied to most Poles.

    in Czechia, they even managed to get half a million Czechs to demonstrate the eternal loyalty to Germany after the Heydrich assassination – and the unit wiping out Lidice as a reprisal was led by Czechs who overnight became

    Poles, Ukrainians and Russians are not Czechs or Slovaks. Though we can not trust your words that what you claim about Czechs is even true.

    Wars are like that, people try to survive or ingratiate themselves to the local power.

    Confession of Beckow, the eternal lackey. Those 16 year old heroes in occupied Zaporizhia were not like that.

    • Agree: Mr. XYZ
    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @AP


    Poles, Ukrainians and Russians are not Czechs or Slovaks. Though we can not trust your words that what you claim about Czechs is even true.
     
    Didn't the Czechs "demonstrate loyalty" to the Nazis as a result of Nazi threats and/or Nazi incentives (money)? So, it wasn't genuine loyalty.

    A lie if applied to most Poles.
     
    Western Upper Silesian Poles did vote to remain a part of Germany back in 1921, though I don't know if that meant that they did not want Polish language rights within Germany. In very late Imperial German Reichstag elections, the Polish Party primarily won in eastern Upper Silesia, not in western Upper Silesia.

    1. In some of Europe. Not in France. Not in the Baltics.
     
    So, Anatol Lieven is wrong here by not mentioning France, right?

    https://www.thenation.com/article/world/ukraine-russia-nationalism-war/

    "This process always required a certain amount of conscious deceit. Thus, a Western diplomat tasked with reporting for the OSCE on the compliance of Latvia’s education laws with minority rights admitted to me that he deliberately lied, in order that Latvia should be able to join the Council of Europe, an essential step on the path to EU membership. Western liberal governments and the media ignored promises made by the Latvian and Estonian governments to their Russian minorities before independence, and have tolerated restrictions on minority rights that they would have vehemently denounced anywhere else."

    Replies: @AP

  428. @AP
    @Ivashka the fool


    One should not follow foreign invented gods
     
    This is the problem. You have taken for granted the Soviet materialistic belief that gods are all invented and that religions are nothing but myths (this label is not meant pejoratively here); Christ was just a Jewish teacher and not the son of God. If that were the case, your approach is completely logical and honorable: choose one’s own people’s myths over those of foreigners. And if one’s own myths have been snuffed out and are no longer accessible (as was mostly the case for the Slavs), then the next best option is to adopt the myths of one’s ancestors’ cousins, that are still practiced and remembered. Such as the belief system of the Aryan Buddha. Or the Zoroastrianism of the ancient Persians. I would probably do the same, if deep down I were a materialist who thought in terms of blood and anthropology.

    But God exists and was incarnated as a Jew. He died and was resurrected. Fortunately, not only for Jews but for all of us. How we approach and make sense of this does vary by nation, the approach of your church father whom you mentioned positively before would be different in certain ways from those of an African convert or Italian theologian.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Mr. Hack

    I am as far as it gets from being a materialist. Quite the opposite to materialism, I believe that the Reality is actually made of active and structured information – Logos. There is no doubt that our Lord Jesus was the Logos, but so was Svyatovit or the Buddha or the neighbor next door and his dog. We all are the Logos at the deepest of our minds. It cannot be otherwise.

    Inside this Ocean of causal active information, the Gods of our ancestors were the Attractors around which the information that was historically specific to our people organized. Once erased, our people started being erased too. That is why Rusyns accepted the infamous name of Ukrainians (border-dwellers) instead of sticking with the name of their Ros/Rus forefathers (Rho being the root for Light in PIE).

    There is no more spiritual vitality left in the souls of the Slavs, they are attracted to any other strong Attractor that is found nearby. Yesterday it was Christianity, today it is the Jew-EU/Jew-US Globalism, tomorrow it would be Islam, which is the spiritual Black Hole of total submission to the Demiurge.

    Those who still hold to anything Aryan among us, or still have the blessings to have access to the remnants of their Old Faith, are the ones who truly represent what is left of what we were supposed to be. Those who are still not completely erased and reformed into the global Abrahamic spiritual play doh that the Demiurge can model into anything he wishes.

    Those are our people.

    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @Ivashka the fool

    How are your prolific lessons being absorbed by your own children? You seem to be ducking the deeper more interesting questions?


    I’m curious as to whose blood and soil your own kids are devoted to (Russian, French, yet to be determined)?
     

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

    , @AP
    @Ivashka the fool


    I am as far as it gets from being a materialist. Quite the opposite to materialism, I believe that the Reality is actually made of active and structured information – Logos. There is no doubt that our Lord Jesus was the Logos, but so was Svyatovit or the Buddha or the neighbor next door and his dog. We all are the Logos at the deepest of our minds. It cannot be otherwise.
     
    If everyone is (equally) the Son of God than no one is. Which is a lot like the materialistic (or perhaps a better term would be secular, profane, positivist) belief that Jesus was just a Jewish teacher, not the Son of God - in which case, there is no special need to follow Him or His Church, we have our own teachers.

    That is why Rusyns accepted the infamous name of Ukrainians (border-dwellers) instead of sticking with the name of their Ros/Rus forefathers (Rho being the root for Light in PIE)
     
    Rus was the name that eastern Slavs adopted after their Rus conquerors and owners, led by a Norseman who came from a region of Sweden with that name. It represents their state of being under the rule of foreigners. The people we now call Russians maintained that tradition, it is appropriate that they kept such a name. Better a geographic name than that.

    There is no more spiritual vitality left in the souls of the Slavs
     
    You've been to churches in Slavic lands, be they in Poland, Ukraine, or even sometimes in Russia (the least devout of the three nations). What you write is mistaken.

    Those who still hold to anything Aryan among us, or still have the blessings to have access to the remnants of their Old Faith, are the ones who truly represent what is left of what we were supposed to be.
     
    Because Jesus was indeed the Son of God than what we were supposed to be would be Christians, with our own unique traditions. Your to criticism about the infusion of foreign Ukrainian influence on the Russian Church, a consequence of the unnatural annexation of Ukrainian lands by Moscow (which spiritually belong within the PLC), has validity to it. The solution would be to revive the still-not-dead Old Believer traditions in Russia (and adopt them for yourself) rather than seek to recreate long-dead Paganism or look for them among very distant cousins who left our homeland thousands of years ago.

    Yesterday it was Christianity, today it is the Jew-EU/Jew-US Globalism, tomorrow it would be Islam, which is the spiritual Black Hole of total submission to the Demiurge.
     
    Islam may be to Christianity, what the revived Hinduism was to Buddhism. It could have been a real danger (Buddhism was ultimately removed form India and Nepal) but I think that time has passed when Christendom surpassed Islamic world and left it in the dust in terms of culture, wealth and technology.

    Christianity continues to grow, globally:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Growth_of_religion#:~:text=According%20to%20various%20scholars%20and,%22Born%20again%22%20every%20day.

    Islam grows faster, but this is due to higher birth rate and not conversion (it is neutral in terms of conversion, while Christianity gains more converts than it loses). And birth rates are slowing down.
    Christianity gains many converts in Asia and Africa.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

  429. Prigozhin today:

    “We went to demonstrate protest, not to overthrow the government in the country. Our “justice march” showed many of the things that we talked about earlier: the most serious security problems throughout the country. We blocked all military units, airfields that were on our way. In 24 hours, we covered the distance that corresponds to the distance from the launch site of the Russian troops on February 24, 2022 to Kiev and from the same point to Uzhgorod. Therefore, if the actions on February 24, 2022, during the start of the special operation in terms of the level of training, the level of moral composure and readiness to perform tasks were as those of Wagner PMC, then perhaps a special operation would probably have lasted a day. It is clear that there were other problems. But we showed the level of organization that the Russian army should correspond to. And when we walked past Russian cities on June 23-24, civilians met us with Russian flags and Wagner PMC emblems. They were all happy when we came and when we passed by. Many of them are still writing words of support, and some are disappointed that we stopped, because in the march of justice in the course of our struggle for existence, they saw support for the fight against bureaucracy and other ailments that exist in our country today. Our march we did start “against injustice”. On the way, we did not kill a single soldier on the ground. In a day we were only 200 km left to Moscow, we entered and completely took control of the city of Rostov. The civilians were glad to see us. We showed a master class, as it should have looked in February 24, 2022. We did not have the goal of overthrowing the regime. We turned around so as not to shed the blood of Russian soldiers.”

    https://t.me/russ_orientalist/14808

    • Thanks: S
    • Replies: @QCIC
    @Ivashka the fool

    Fascinating!

  430. @A123
    @QCIC

    If you think loud f-bombing red necks sound like Feds, you are badly confused about the reality of America.

    One of the unmasked is likely identified... Antifa & student at UC Riverside. So not Feds, but other SJW scum.

    Unmasking infiltrators so they can be doxxed is is an excellent tactic. I expect it will become much more common. Traitors like FBI and Antifa need anonymity to operate.

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @QCIC

    I think I saw a ‘Proud Boys’ shirt on one of the good guys. Last I heard they were thought to be Feds.

    • Replies: @A123
    @QCIC

    Share your source and evidence that "100% of all Proud Boys members are Feds".

    Or retract and apologize.

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @QCIC

  431. @Wokechoke
    @Sean

    This is definitely not the case. Every one of these generals is keen to emulate Pierce Edmond De Lacy, Suverov, Potemkin, Kutusov to keep Crimea and Donbas.

    Replies: @Sean

    Russia started this war with more of an edge in deployable military potential than it now enjoys, and given that the collective West’s potential military productive capacity greatly exceeds Russia’s I see no reason to assume that a long grinding war in which Western production lines for shells and weapons currently from stocks being husbanded may be restarted and kept going in an open ended way could be a safe bet for Putin. While RusFed has the resources it is being stingy with them, and that is not in the Russian military tradition at all. When the original American plan for D Day was shown to General Bernard Montgomery he said it was unworkable and there needed to be far more troops in the invasion force. That got the plan changed.

    Never forget that Shoigu signed off on a plan formulated by Gerasimov-who certainly ought to have known much better–to invade Ukraine with what all observers said before the first shot was fired was was an inadequate force. Though small the initial invasion deployed the best professional troops in the Russia armed forces and lost a considerable number of them. This point was where the false economizing really should have stopped and the principle of concentrating the most massive force feasible to bring to battle and destroy the enemy army should have been the guide.

    Putin obviously views a raising a large force for major new offensive now as impulsiveness, which is anathema to him. He needs someone to tell him what yes men careerists Shoigu and Gerasimov won’t. Those two are loathed in the Russian army you know

  432. @QCIC
    @A123

    I think I saw a 'Proud Boys' shirt on one of the good guys. Last I heard they were thought to be Feds.

    Replies: @A123

    Share your source and evidence that “100% of all Proud Boys members are Feds”.

    Or retract and apologize.

    PEACE 😇

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @A123

    Two groups of people blinded in one eye already. I refered to this video in a post earlier.


    Clueless but well meaning flag waving patriotards v callow college boys who've had enough time to research the root problem but still think anything to be done.

    One poster called Benny Johnson cackling about the divided goys.

    , @QCIC
    @A123

    Keep your mind on a swivel.

    If I recall correctly, this information was worked out through background checks on some of the J6 protesters or other high profile events and is widely known. Maybe only some are plants, perhaps that is the case in this video.

    This is not my issue, but I thought I should point it out and cannot retract it. I think it is pretty standard to stage both sides of a provocation, that way no one actually gets hurt. Why they would expose some of their own plants is a fair question. Someone can work that out after we sort out Prigozhin.

    Replies: @A123

  433. @AP
    @Ivashka the fool


    One should not follow foreign invented gods
     
    This is the problem. You have taken for granted the Soviet materialistic belief that gods are all invented and that religions are nothing but myths (this label is not meant pejoratively here); Christ was just a Jewish teacher and not the son of God. If that were the case, your approach is completely logical and honorable: choose one’s own people’s myths over those of foreigners. And if one’s own myths have been snuffed out and are no longer accessible (as was mostly the case for the Slavs), then the next best option is to adopt the myths of one’s ancestors’ cousins, that are still practiced and remembered. Such as the belief system of the Aryan Buddha. Or the Zoroastrianism of the ancient Persians. I would probably do the same, if deep down I were a materialist who thought in terms of blood and anthropology.

    But God exists and was incarnated as a Jew. He died and was resurrected. Fortunately, not only for Jews but for all of us. How we approach and make sense of this does vary by nation, the approach of your church father whom you mentioned positively before would be different in certain ways from those of an African convert or Italian theologian.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Mr. Hack

    It’s nice to hear some straight talk on the subject matter.

    14 “You are the light of the world. A town built on a hill cannot be hidden. 15 Neither do people light a lamp and put it under a bowl. Instead they put it on its stand, and it gives light to everyone in the house. 16 In the same way, let your light shine before others, that they may see your good deeds and glorify your Father in heaven.

    Matthew 5:14-1

  434. @Beckow
    @Yevardian

    The small ovation suggests more-nationalist sympathies than the current Putin's policies - if anything, it was a scream to go bloody-all-the-way...

    How does that hurt Putin when he is fighting a war? It also reaffirms the Russian normies' sense that Putin represents the moderate option - maybe 80-90% of the population. Being between pro-Nato liberals and the fuming, hot-headed nationalists is not a bad place when fighting a war. I suspect it was stage-managed, or at least encouraged and tolerated by Kremlin.

    AK has climbed up somewhere where the liberals and the radical always frustrated nationalists meet, a lonely place quite appropriate for a libertarian-leaning non-family eternal outsider. Or should I say, descended down there...it is an irrelevant place.

    Replies: @QCIC

    Rostov-on-Don is is roughly 50 miles from the Ukrainian border. Close to Mariupol and the Azovstal Western base. They have been close to ground zero for a long time and probably have been accepting a continuous stream of refugees since 2015. I think many residents would cheer Wagner guys independently of all other political concerns.

    Numerous people in this large city probably have first hand knowledge of NeoNAZI atrocities, so hell yeah, they probably want the military to go in hard. There are probably some big fans of the scorched-earth approach.

  435. @Ivashka the fool
    @AP

    I am as far as it gets from being a materialist. Quite the opposite to materialism, I believe that the Reality is actually made of active and structured information - Logos. There is no doubt that our Lord Jesus was the Logos, but so was Svyatovit or the Buddha or the neighbor next door and his dog. We all are the Logos at the deepest of our minds. It cannot be otherwise.

    Inside this Ocean of causal active information, the Gods of our ancestors were the Attractors around which the information that was historically specific to our people organized. Once erased, our people started being erased too. That is why Rusyns accepted the infamous name of Ukrainians (border-dwellers) instead of sticking with the name of their Ros/Rus forefathers (Rho being the root for Light in PIE).

    There is no more spiritual vitality left in the souls of the Slavs, they are attracted to any other strong Attractor that is found nearby. Yesterday it was Christianity, today it is the Jew-EU/Jew-US Globalism, tomorrow it would be Islam, which is the spiritual Black Hole of total submission to the Demiurge.

    Those who still hold to anything Aryan among us, or still have the blessings to have access to the remnants of their Old Faith, are the ones who truly represent what is left of what we were supposed to be. Those who are still not completely erased and reformed into the global Abrahamic spiritual play doh that the Demiurge can model into anything he wishes.

    Those are our people.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @AP

    How are your prolific lessons being absorbed by your own children? You seem to be ducking the deeper more interesting questions?

    I’m curious as to whose blood and soil your own kids are devoted to (Russian, French, yet to be determined)?

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @Mr. Hack

    I taught them what I could of my imperfect understanding. They are free to apply it for themselves, if and as they see fit. They are the result of a complex mix of karmic influences. So they will have interesting lives, they already have started living interesting existences. They will learn a lot. We all come into this existence to learn and become better mind-streams.

    My children are no exception. I wish they had an ancestral Attractor to hold on to, it makes things easier, but I did my best that they have Dharma as a refuge instead. Dharma is the Universal Refuge and wide opened door to escape towards Enlightenment. That is how I taught my kids.

    Buddha is a valid source of knowledge. I hope they learn from the tradition of the Indo - Scythian princely ascetic, just like I did for so many years now and still do on a daily basis.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @AP

  436. @Ivashka the fool
    Prigozhin today:

    "We went to demonstrate protest, not to overthrow the government in the country. Our "justice march" showed many of the things that we talked about earlier: the most serious security problems throughout the country. We blocked all military units, airfields that were on our way. In 24 hours, we covered the distance that corresponds to the distance from the launch site of the Russian troops on February 24, 2022 to Kiev and from the same point to Uzhgorod. Therefore, if the actions on February 24, 2022, during the start of the special operation in terms of the level of training, the level of moral composure and readiness to perform tasks were as those of Wagner PMC, then perhaps a special operation would probably have lasted a day. It is clear that there were other problems. But we showed the level of organization that the Russian army should correspond to. And when we walked past Russian cities on June 23-24, civilians met us with Russian flags and Wagner PMC emblems. They were all happy when we came and when we passed by. Many of them are still writing words of support, and some are disappointed that we stopped, because in the march of justice in the course of our struggle for existence, they saw support for the fight against bureaucracy and other ailments that exist in our country today. Our march we did start "against injustice". On the way, we did not kill a single soldier on the ground. In a day we were only 200 km left to Moscow, we entered and completely took control of the city of Rostov. The civilians were glad to see us. We showed a master class, as it should have looked in February 24, 2022. We did not have the goal of overthrowing the regime. We turned around so as not to shed the blood of Russian soldiers."
     

    https://t.me/russ_orientalist/14808

    Replies: @QCIC

    Fascinating!

  437. Battle of the Nations
    Latvia Czechia

    • Replies: @LatW
    @Emil Nikola Richard


    Battle of the Nations
    Latvia Czechia
     
    She's a beast. I actually like that she put on all that mass, it looks like it only made her stronger and only helped. Well done, baby girl! 💐

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    , @Gerard1234
    @Emil Nikola Richard

    In true Baltic Nazi subhuman lowlife tradition.........her real name is not actually Jelena. Something to do with the stupid rules they have on giving the children Russian names. She has had a good career, but too inconsistent. More consistant in tournament-by tournament performance than Kvitova, but without Kvitova's level of talent.

    Krejcikova, unbelievably, has lost in 1st round in French open for 2 years, after winning it 3 years before. Probably will do well at Wimbledon.

    Replies: @LatW

  438. @Mr. Hack
    @Ivashka the fool

    How are your prolific lessons being absorbed by your own children? You seem to be ducking the deeper more interesting questions?


    I’m curious as to whose blood and soil your own kids are devoted to (Russian, French, yet to be determined)?
     

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

    I taught them what I could of my imperfect understanding. They are free to apply it for themselves, if and as they see fit. They are the result of a complex mix of karmic influences. So they will have interesting lives, they already have started living interesting existences. They will learn a lot. We all come into this existence to learn and become better mind-streams.

    My children are no exception. I wish they had an ancestral Attractor to hold on to, it makes things easier, but I did my best that they have Dharma as a refuge instead. Dharma is the Universal Refuge and wide opened door to escape towards Enlightenment. That is how I taught my kids.

    Buddha is a valid source of knowledge. I hope they learn from the tradition of the Indo – Scythian princely ascetic, just like I did for so many years now and still do on a daily basis.

    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @Ivashka the fool

    So "blood and soil" is out for your own children, and "karmic influences" is in. I would think that this is so with most young folks in the world today, especially if they're born and raised in the diaspora. And the world is becoming more and more of a "global village" as the nationalism that was born of a different century slides into the background. Perhaps, Karlin has come to this realization forcing him into his newest reincarnation?

    I'm not trying to pick on you and have seen similar approaches by many Ukrainian families in the diaspora. "Blood and soil" was literally a very prevalent philosophy embraced by many Ukrainian immigrants after WWII. Where are their offspring today? Most all are caught up in the Darwinian game of carving out a niche within the complicated game of survival, that often doesn't include sentimental attachments to the "old country".

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Coconuts

    , @AP
    @Ivashka the fool


    Buddha is a valid source of knowledge. I hope they learn from the tradition of the Indo – Scythian princely ascetic,
     
    Incidentally, the book I had mentioned before:

    https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/519zZ2whXgL._SX427_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg

    Claims that Scythians originated the idea of monotheism conceptualized as a main God in the sky (and condemned worship of lesser gods), and that the Jews learned this from them. That is, this is ultimately an Indo-European Attractor after all.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

  439. Karaganov again:

    https://ria.ru/20230625/yao-1880235742.html

    There is no choice left: Russia will have to launch a nuclear strike on Europe

    However, the question arises who can and should be the target of such an attack. The Americans, as we all know, shamelessly lied, saying that we were preparing for strikes against Ukraine. This is a monstrous senselessness, malicious, because, of course, the Ukrainians are an unfortunate deceived people who are being driven to the slaughter. But still, these are our people, we will not hit them. If it comes to nuclear strikes, then we should talk about a number of countries in Europe that provide the greatest assistance to the Kyiv mercenary regime.

    Fortunately, we have begun to take steps up the ladder of nuclear deterrence. But we need to move faster and more decisively, although, of course, the use of nuclear weapons is a monstrous step, it should be avoided if possible. But, as the vector of development of the West, its elites and society, their movement towards anti-human and post-human values ​​shows, all this clearly indicates an objective approach to a big thermonuclear war. We must interrupt this process and thus save the world – if possible, of course, avoiding super-tough actions.

    • Replies: @QCIC
    @Ivashka the fool

    This stands out from your excerpt:


    But, as the vector of development of the West, its elites and society, their movement towards anti-human and post-human values ​​shows, all this clearly indicates an objective approach to a big thermonuclear war. We must interrupt this process and thus save the world – if possible, of course, avoiding super-tough actions.
     
    Bold added by me.

    Wow.
  440. @Ivashka the fool
    @Mr. Hack

    I taught them what I could of my imperfect understanding. They are free to apply it for themselves, if and as they see fit. They are the result of a complex mix of karmic influences. So they will have interesting lives, they already have started living interesting existences. They will learn a lot. We all come into this existence to learn and become better mind-streams.

    My children are no exception. I wish they had an ancestral Attractor to hold on to, it makes things easier, but I did my best that they have Dharma as a refuge instead. Dharma is the Universal Refuge and wide opened door to escape towards Enlightenment. That is how I taught my kids.

    Buddha is a valid source of knowledge. I hope they learn from the tradition of the Indo - Scythian princely ascetic, just like I did for so many years now and still do on a daily basis.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @AP

    So “blood and soil” is out for your own children, and “karmic influences” is in. I would think that this is so with most young folks in the world today, especially if they’re born and raised in the diaspora. And the world is becoming more and more of a “global village” as the nationalism that was born of a different century slides into the background. Perhaps, Karlin has come to this realization forcing him into his newest reincarnation?

    I’m not trying to pick on you and have seen similar approaches by many Ukrainian families in the diaspora. “Blood and soil” was literally a very prevalent philosophy embraced by many Ukrainian immigrants after WWII. Where are their offspring today? Most all are caught up in the Darwinian game of carving out a niche within the complicated game of survival, that often doesn’t include sentimental attachments to the “old country”.

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @Mr. Hack

    Nations are also structured around myths, secular ones, of post-Enlightment type: liberté, égalité, fraternité (donnez-moi du thé). Compared to the Old Faith mythology that permeated the whole of our ancestors' existence, these rationalist national mythologies are weak and frail, fake and gay.

    AP was right when he provided the excerpt from the "Into the heart of darkness" book above. The European philosophers who provided the basis for the nation-building did a disservice to the Mankind. Bloodlines are what matters, spiritual bonds are what matters, networks are what matters. Nation myths look like they were written by ChatGPT 3.0. They are simplistic and unfit for evolution.

    Besides, Russian people have never reached the stage where they would have become a nation, therefore I have never been a nationalist, more of a tribalist of an extended Balto-Slav, Y haplogroup R1a kind (nor even sure whether it might be called nationalism at all).

    Of course, my kids have nothing to do with all that, they are living in a completely different reality. A reality of networking and collaborating on a global scale, on the level of which the fratricidal sensless warfare between two branches of Eastern Slavs looks absurd bordering on obscene. When they talk about the war there, they talk with compassion, but also disdain. And they are right. What happens there is a bloody shame, disgusting in its sheer cruel stupidity.

    It must end ASAP.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

    , @Coconuts
    @Mr. Hack

    The global village:


    I still remember the day when I gave them a sentence from the Guermantes Way to write a commentary on:

    The purity of her blood, where for many generations only what was greatest in the history of France was to be found, had removed from her way of being anything like what men of the people might call 'fancy airs' and had granted her the most perfect simplicity of manner.

    I looked at Ben, scratching his head and his balls, chewing his gum. What would he understand about that, the big ape? What would any of them understand about it? Even for myself, I was starting to have trouble understanding what Proust meant exactly. Dozens of pages about purity of blood, the nobility of genius compared to the nobility of blood, the specific social milieu of great professors of medicine... all of it seemed completely tedious.

    Nowadays we were living in a more simplified world, evidently. The duchess of Guermantes had a lot less cash than Snoop Dog; Snoop Dog has a lot less cash than Bill Gates but he made the girls a lot wetter. Two parameters at most, nothing more.
     

    In the global market square now I think there is a third vector of value; oppressed/oppressor. Things have become more complex since the late 90s. So there is the cash one, the sexual market value one and the oppressed/oppressor one.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

  441. @QCIC
    @A123

    Looks and sounds a bit like two groups of Feds.

    Replies: @A123, @Wokechoke

    Two groups of people blinded in one eye already. I refered to this video in a post earlier.

    Clueless but well meaning flag waving patriotards v callow college boys who’ve had enough time to research the root problem but still think anything to be done.

    One poster called Benny Johnson cackling about the divided goys.

  442. @A123
    @QCIC

    Share your source and evidence that "100% of all Proud Boys members are Feds".

    Or retract and apologize.

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @QCIC

    Two groups of people blinded in one eye already. I refered to this video in a post earlier.

    Clueless but well meaning flag waving patriotards v callow college boys who’ve had enough time to research the root problem but still think anything to be done.

    One poster called Benny Johnson cackling about the divided goys.

  443. @AP
    @Mikhail

    Since when is less than 50% majority?

    Replies: @Mikhail

    Tatars were never a majority in Crimea from the 1897 census to the present, in addition to not having predated the Rus Slav presence there. To simply say that the Tatars are a mix of different people in Crimea including those predating the Rus Slav presence suggestively omits that the same can be said of Rus Slavs, in addition to noting that the core group associated with the Crimean Tatars came after the Rus Slav presence.

    • Replies: @AP
    @Mikhail


    Tatars were never a majority in Crimea from the 1897 census to the present
     
    That’s not what I said.

    Tatars outnumbered Russians in 1897 and Russians didn’t become a majority until they expelled the Tatar natives during World War II.

    the Rus Slav presence there
     
    Is reading maps hard for you?

    Rus presence was limited to 1% of Crimean territory, the tiny corner near the Kerch bridge.

    That’s all that can be claimed based on medieval Rus presence.

    Your argument is as dumb as claiming some Swedish right to all of North America because Delaware was once a Swedish colony.

    the core group associated with the Crimean Tatars came after the Rus Slav presence.
     
    Crimean Tatars are genetically about 40% Asian. More than Turks in Turkey, but still mostly local.

    And again, “Rus Slav presence” was in 1% of Crimea.

    Replies: @Mikhail

  444. @Emil Nikola Richard
    Battle of the Nations
    Latvia Czechia

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gkJhFHbRNVI&ab_channel=WTA

    Replies: @LatW, @Gerard1234

    Battle of the Nations
    Latvia Czechia

    She’s a beast. I actually like that she put on all that mass, it looks like it only made her stronger and only helped. Well done, baby girl! 💐

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @LatW

    I like how she's of partially Ukrainian descent.

    Replies: @LatW

  445. @AP
    @Mikhail


    The Rus Slavs were in Crimea before the Tatars
     
    Rus had an outpost in Crimea. The Crimean Tatars are of course descended from a mix of Tatar invaders and Greeks, Ostrogoths and others who lived there from ancient times. Saying that those people trace back only to the 13th century is as dumb as claiming that Turks in Turkey are some kind of newcomers.

    Replies: @Mikhail

    Rus had an outpost in Crimea. The Crimean Tatars are of course descended from a mix of Tatar invaders and Greeks, Ostrogoths and others who lived there from ancient times. Saying that those people trace back only to the 13th century is as dumb as claiming that Turks in Turkey are some kind of newcomers.

    The slave trading Tatar Khanate came after (not before) the Rus Slav presence in Crimea. As noted –

    Tatars were never a majority in Crimea from the 1897 census to the present, in addition to not having predated the Rus Slav presence there. To simply say that the Tatars are a mix of different people in Crimea including those predating the Rus Slav presence suggestively omits that the same can be said of Rus Slavs, in addition to noting that the core group associated with the Crimean Tatars came after the Rus Slav presence.

    • Replies: @AP
    @Mikhail


    Tatars were never a majority in Crimea from the 1897 census to the present
     
    But they outnumbered Russians in 1897 and Russians themselves did not become a majority until World War II.

    To simply say that the Tatars are a mix of different people in Crimea including those predating the Rus Slav presence

     

    That’s not an implication but a statement of fact. In Crimea, the Tatars absorbed the Greeks, Ostrogoths and others who had previously been living there.

    Also the medieval Rus presence in Crimea was only in a small corner near the Kerch strait. Perhaps 1% of Crimea’s territory. Most of that principality was in what is now the Russian side of the strait.

    So your argument manages to be stupid on two levels: Crimean Tatars are descended from the pre-Tatar invasion inhabitants; and, the medieval Rus didn’t rule 99% of Crimean territory.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @Mikhail

  446. @A123
    @QCIC

    Share your source and evidence that "100% of all Proud Boys members are Feds".

    Or retract and apologize.

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @QCIC

    Keep your mind on a swivel.

    If I recall correctly, this information was worked out through background checks on some of the J6 protesters or other high profile events and is widely known. Maybe only some are plants, perhaps that is the case in this video.

    This is not my issue, but I thought I should point it out and cannot retract it. I think it is pretty standard to stage both sides of a provocation, that way no one actually gets hurt. Why they would expose some of their own plants is a fair question. Someone can work that out after we sort out Prigozhin.

    • Replies: @A123
    @QCIC

    Keep your mind on a swivel.

    • Share your source and evidence that “100% of all Proud Boys members are Feds”.
    • Or retract and apologize.

    There is no shame in a retraction if your mistake was accidental. However, it came across as intentional misrepresentation for the purposes of strawmanning. A broad sweep at everyone.

    If you want to say, the FBI managed to penetrate The Proud Boys with multiple informants ... You could try that. How many informants? -&- How many members? Would be the obvious next questions.

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @QCIC

  447. @Ivashka the fool
    Karaganov again:

    https://ria.ru/20230625/yao-1880235742.html

    There is no choice left: Russia will have to launch a nuclear strike on Europe

    However, the question arises who can and should be the target of such an attack. The Americans, as we all know, shamelessly lied, saying that we were preparing for strikes against Ukraine. This is a monstrous senselessness, malicious, because, of course, the Ukrainians are an unfortunate deceived people who are being driven to the slaughter. But still, these are our people, we will not hit them. If it comes to nuclear strikes, then we should talk about a number of countries in Europe that provide the greatest assistance to the Kyiv mercenary regime.

    Fortunately, we have begun to take steps up the ladder of nuclear deterrence. But we need to move faster and more decisively, although, of course, the use of nuclear weapons is a monstrous step, it should be avoided if possible. But, as the vector of development of the West, its elites and society, their movement towards anti-human and post-human values ​​shows, all this clearly indicates an objective approach to a big thermonuclear war. We must interrupt this process and thus save the world - if possible, of course, avoiding super-tough actions.
     

    Replies: @QCIC

    This stands out from your excerpt:

    But, as the vector of development of the West, its elites and society, their movement towards anti-human and post-human values ​​shows, all this clearly indicates an objective approach to a big thermonuclear war. We must interrupt this process and thus save the world – if possible, of course, avoiding super-tough actions.

    Bold added by me.

    Wow.

  448. @Mr. Hack
    @Ivashka the fool

    So "blood and soil" is out for your own children, and "karmic influences" is in. I would think that this is so with most young folks in the world today, especially if they're born and raised in the diaspora. And the world is becoming more and more of a "global village" as the nationalism that was born of a different century slides into the background. Perhaps, Karlin has come to this realization forcing him into his newest reincarnation?

    I'm not trying to pick on you and have seen similar approaches by many Ukrainian families in the diaspora. "Blood and soil" was literally a very prevalent philosophy embraced by many Ukrainian immigrants after WWII. Where are their offspring today? Most all are caught up in the Darwinian game of carving out a niche within the complicated game of survival, that often doesn't include sentimental attachments to the "old country".

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Coconuts

    Nations are also structured around myths, secular ones, of post-Enlightment type: liberté, égalité, fraternité (donnez-moi du thé). Compared to the Old Faith mythology that permeated the whole of our ancestors’ existence, these rationalist national mythologies are weak and frail, fake and gay.

    AP was right when he provided the excerpt from the “Into the heart of darkness” book above. The European philosophers who provided the basis for the nation-building did a disservice to the Mankind. Bloodlines are what matters, spiritual bonds are what matters, networks are what matters. Nation myths look like they were written by ChatGPT 3.0. They are simplistic and unfit for evolution.

    Besides, Russian people have never reached the stage where they would have become a nation, therefore I have never been a nationalist, more of a tribalist of an extended Balto-Slav, Y haplogroup R1a kind (nor even sure whether it might be called nationalism at all).

    Of course, my kids have nothing to do with all that, they are living in a completely different reality. A reality of networking and collaborating on a global scale, on the level of which the fratricidal sensless warfare between two branches of Eastern Slavs looks absurd bordering on obscene. When they talk about the war there, they talk with compassion, but also disdain. And they are right. What happens there is a bloody shame, disgusting in its sheer cruel stupidity.

    It must end ASAP.

    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @Ivashka the fool


    The European philosophers who provided the basis for the nation-building did a disservice to the Mankind. Bloodlines are what matters, spiritual bonds are what matters, networks are what matters. Nation myths look like they were written by ChatGPT 3.0. They are simplistic and unfit for evolution.
     
    Can't say that I really agree with you here. Your children's blood lines have been mixed, are they missing out on some deeper moorings or grounding? By your own admission, they probably will never feel a need to submit to an old fashioned reliance on "blood and soil". Blood lines will continue to mix as time goes on. Spiritual bonds (or lack of) is closer to an intellectual acquiescence to some sort of philosophy or network of belonging than any sort of biological markers or DNA. From what I've read, ChatGPT is quite flexible, "soil and bloodlines" seem much more rigid. :-)
  449. @Mr. XYZ
    @24th Alabama

    Poland's leadership isn't Christian? Or Ukraine's pre-2019 leadership, for that matter?

    Replies: @24th Alabama

    Poland and Ukraine are “major” nations?
    Okay, no quibble.

  450. @Ivashka the fool
    @24th Alabama

    My beef with Pynya is that he isn't Russian and isn't a leader. Simple enough?

    Now, about me being an insider on Russian affairs, we have a better one among us here on this forum: Dmitry is the real RF insider here. Never mind him being a Noviop, that's as close as it gets to being Russian in most people's understanding.

    This is due to the Russian ethnos actually dying under the brilliant guidance, and the PR glitter of Pynya the dwarf and his clique of corrupt and inept parasite underlings.

    Any other questions?

    Replies: @silviosilver, @Emil Nikola Richard, @24th Alabama

    I’m still confused about who you are and what
    you are about, but I wish you well.

    • Thanks: Ivashka the fool
    • Replies: @Another Polish Perspective
    @24th Alabama

    I would say that he is someone who yearns for "eternal return", and is looking for it wherever he can (today: in Japan), even rightly so as "return" and kind of " organic holism" was a fundamental concept of many pre-Christian cultures. Interestingly, he is drawn to Buddhims which is based on the idea of eternal return too.

    But he does not want to see that linear eschatology is more in tune with scientific worldview and its "panta rhei", and that even his beloved Old Believers lived in the expectation of the Last Judgement. He wants Old Believers without Last Judgement, as for him they became primarily a vehicle of Russian essence, which in itself could be counted as a sin against the First Commandment.

    Replies: @Another Polish Perspective

    , @Dmitry
    @24th Alabama

    Ivashka the fool/bashibuzuk is giving you authentic taste of the Soviet person and the Soviet bohemian Moscow peoples' culture. It is an authentic taste of a lost world of the underground Moscow hipsters in around 1986. His posts smell of "the perestroika", but it has now some bitter smell after the unhappy events of the later decades.

    As for Putin, he is very popular for American rightwing people. We even have AP in this thread as the example of American rightwing person who still cannot be separated from Putin's marketing, even after Putin attacked his favorite country.

    In the performance review, Putin had one job, which is not to crash the postsoviet plane. Imagine you are in a plane. Your pilot has one job. He doesn't have to win a competition in the airshow. He can drink champagne and cheat his company expensive, I don't care. He just has to fly the plane and not crash our lives in the ground.

    After February 2022, I'm pretty sure he is crashing the plane in the ground. Plane is burning, tail is bent. Air hostess is trying to enter the cabin to fly the plane. Most of us with parachutes have been jumping out of the plane etc.

    Replies: @Greasy William

  451. @Anatoly Karlin
    @AP


    If China invaded and occupied parts of Russia would you denigrate the sacrifice of those who resist by saying “RusFed is unworthy of dying for?”
     
    Yes, I would. Under almost any such scenario, the background is that Russia became a lapdog for American neocons, e.g. in the event that Khodorkovsky types and/or White Rex take over post-Putin. Under such conditions, it would not be unreasonable for the Chinese to intervene to contain the threat.

    In light of the above, I would not want Russians to spill their blood for American neocon interests and would consider those who think otherwise to be naive idiots at best, in light of the population and GDP differential between RF and China; and I would consider those Russian leaders and activists who try to force Russians who disagree to sacrifice themselves (e.g. through conscription and border closures) to be degenerates deserving of summary extermination, and would have no compunctions about reporting their coordinates to the PLA in order to accelerate the end of the conflict.

    The optimal strategy overall would be surrender ASAP and let the W*stoids and Chinese duke it out for world hegemony. Flip sides to whoever's winning near the end.

    Replies: @silviosilver, @Yahya, @Mr. XYZ

    In light of the above, I would not want Russians to spill their blood for American neocon interests and would consider those who think otherwise to be naive idiots at best,

    But what if Russia’s elite human capital deem it necessary to join the Americans in order to preserve freedom, democracy and LGBT rights in Russia?

    • LOL: Ivashka the fool
  452. S says:
    @Ivashka the fool
    @silviosilver

    Japan under the Shogunate, when they had exterminated the Christian convert population and closed its borders with the exception of a very strictly controlled trade with the Dutch.

    https://youtu.be/cuTjBL28l0U

    Probably the best movie I watched in the last few years.

    The Japanese did the right thing, they survived as people and culture due to these cruel choices.

    Around the same period, Russians have opened the door to the West under the Romanovs, a door through which later came the ideas of Enlightenment, logically followed by the Judeo-Bolshevik scum, replaced by their Noviop offspring.

    And now, due to this fatal choices and their consequences, Russian people will most probably vanish from history, most of their unique culture already being lost as we speak. One should honor and respect one's ancestors, their ways and their beliefs for they are in him and he only lives because they lived and suffered.

    One should not follow foreign invented gods and should not lust for foreign made notions such as "progress", "equality", "freedom", but instead should value harmony and devotion to one's blood and soil. When a people betrays their ancestors, this people is bound to disappear from the history and the memories of mankind.

    This is historical justice.

    If Russia centers on itself and its tragic experience, learning from it and developing a healthy outlook on its past since times immemorial, then perhaps it could still be saved. Otherwise, it'll rot and decay as it had done for the last two generations. And one day it will crumble, never to rebuild again.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @Another Polish Perspective, @AP, @S

    The Japanese did the right thing, they survived as people and culture due to these cruel choices.

    This reminds me how there is a subtle (though also quite deliberate) aspect of many a US war, where the illigitimate children resulting from US soldier liaisons with locals were often (if not typically) left behind (ie simply abandoned as orphans) in country after the US forces departed. This creates an instant ‘oppressed minority’ which the US, shedding many crocodile tears, can then cynically use to divide their original host nation.

    Tens of thousands of ‘Amerasian’ children were abandoned in Vietnam, where they were understandably seen as alien and not accepted by the Vietnamese, after the final conclusion of the Vietnam War in 1975. The United States finally took them in after the passage of the American Homecoming Act in 1988, something it should responsibly have done in 1975, but, had they done that, these orphans couldn’t have been used as leverage by the US against the Vietnamese.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Homecoming_Act

    An example of how Amerasian children were often created, this time in US occupied Korean War era postwar Japan. (This is from the 1954 movie The Bridges at Toki-Ri.)

    I wouldn’t be so plain spoken (not harsh) about the progressive (so called) Multi-Culturalists as I am, but their being arrogant, not to mention totalitarian in mindset, makes it necessary.

    They ignore all the warning signs their ideology is false and not working, ie the destroyed US inner cities, mass Black on White rape, Black on White criminality, Jonestown, the thoroughly and utterly corrupt/morally debased present ‘progressive’ US government, and will violently hunt down any group who simply would like to peacably separate from them.

    Ultimately, it seems, the self declared ‘progressives’ intend to suicidally take everyone else down with them they possibly can into the black hole of death and destruction known as WWIII.

  453. @24th Alabama
    @Ivashka the fool

    I'm still confused about who you are and what
    you are about, but I wish you well.

    Replies: @Another Polish Perspective, @Dmitry

    I would say that he is someone who yearns for “eternal return”, and is looking for it wherever he can (today: in Japan), even rightly so as “return” and kind of ” organic holism” was a fundamental concept of many pre-Christian cultures. Interestingly, he is drawn to Buddhims which is based on the idea of eternal return too.

    But he does not want to see that linear eschatology is more in tune with scientific worldview and its “panta rhei”, and that even his beloved Old Believers lived in the expectation of the Last Judgement. He wants Old Believers without Last Judgement, as for him they became primarily a vehicle of Russian essence, which in itself could be counted as a sin against the First Commandment.

    • Thanks: 24th Alabama
    • Replies: @Another Polish Perspective
    @Another Polish Perspective

    But you can learn from him a lot about Russia.

    I, for example, have learnt today from him that Russia had fighting monks too.... and that "Black Sotnias" of the late Romanov empire got their name from that bygone phenomenon (actually, as you would expect from the name of any conservative organisation).

  454. @Ivashka the fool
    @Another Polish Perspective

    What would have happened in Japan if accepting Christianity (Latin rite Catholicism to be more specific) would have been what unfortunately happened in ancient Rus during its (protracted) conversion. In Rus, the Christianisation took a dozen generations at least, probably more.

    People had Christian names given to them at the baptism, but they also had Slavic nicknames that they used on a dayly basis. They went to church on holidays, but still told pagan byliny in which Ilya Muromets shots down the crosses from atop the Kievan churches. If vityazi warriors going to battle, met with a (chernets) monk, then it was seen as a bad omen, and they even sometimes killed the poor man outright to conjure the evil spell. The anonymous bard who composed the The Tale of the Igor's Campaign, writing in the late twelve century, wrote a pagan poem citing Old Gods and claiming that the Rus were their children. That was 200 years after Vladimir the Khazar maiden's son betrayal of his heroic father's Faith.

    It was only after the Mongol conquest, due to the genocide that was unleashed on southern Rus, and to the protection the Mongols awarded to the Church (the Mongols forbade aggression and plunder of the Church domains and exempted it from paying taxes) that Christianity ultimately completely prevailed against paganism in the popular Rus masses. But even then the resulting Russian Orthodoxy was different from the Greek Byzantine faith and the Greeks were often described as hypocrite and crafty.

    The Russian version was more Nordic, way more open minded towards the other religions, and way less obsessed with worldly wealth and power. It's greatest representatives, such as Sergius of Radonezh, were not afraid to work hard themselves with their own hands building their own monasteries in remote wilderness (that's where the Russian name for a large monastery - pustyn' comes from) instead of building it as close as possible to a market as they did in Western Europe at the time. The monasteries also had battle ready monk units, the famous black hundreds, in case of Tatar, Cheremiss or Lithuanian attacks. Monks in these units seem to have been known by their pagan names, such as Peresvet and Oslyabya brothers who Sergius sent along the Prince Dmitry to battle the Mamai's Tatar troops, their Genoan mercenaries and their Lithuanian allies who luckily arrived too late for the battle, turned around and went back to the Rus lands that they have already submitted due to their elites being cowards seduced by the Latin Church.

    Only when the Czar Aleksey Mikhailovich brought the Raskol ruin upon the Russian lands, had the spiritual backbone of the nation been broken but it still unfortunately happened despite the sacrifice of the best among the nobility and the clergy. And the Jesuit educated Greek and Maloross popes were at the forefront of the religious reforms, instilling their poison in the Russian society. A poison that helped Peter the Great turning Russians into the same enserfed bydlo that Maloross, Ruthenian and Polish peasants have been turned into centuries before with the warm blessing of the Latin Church.

    The Japanese would have ended the same, despite all their exceptional character - slaves in their own lands, their traditions trampled, their spirit distorted and erased. This is what happens with those who betray their ancestors, the Japanese didn't betray theirs, that is why their land is still the Land of the Rising Sun. They did the right thing stomping the Jesuit vermin.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @Another Polish Perspective

    I wish that I had the time to unravel every little Crook and Nanny that you unveil here, but I’m still grateful for the abridged version (such deep thought). I’m not up to the task of either agreeing or disagreeing with much of anything that you’ve written here, but I appreciate your fervor. 🙂

  455. A123 says: • Website
    @QCIC
    @A123

    Keep your mind on a swivel.

    If I recall correctly, this information was worked out through background checks on some of the J6 protesters or other high profile events and is widely known. Maybe only some are plants, perhaps that is the case in this video.

    This is not my issue, but I thought I should point it out and cannot retract it. I think it is pretty standard to stage both sides of a provocation, that way no one actually gets hurt. Why they would expose some of their own plants is a fair question. Someone can work that out after we sort out Prigozhin.

    Replies: @A123

    Keep your mind on a swivel.

    • Share your source and evidence that “100% of all Proud Boys members are Feds”.
    • Or retract and apologize.

    There is no shame in a retraction if your mistake was accidental. However, it came across as intentional misrepresentation for the purposes of strawmanning. A broad sweep at everyone.

    If you want to say, the FBI managed to penetrate The Proud Boys with multiple informants … You could try that. How many informants? -&- How many members? Would be the obvious next questions.

    PEACE 😇

    • Replies: @QCIC
    @A123

    No thanks. You can sort this out on your own. Not all of my sources are accepted at TUR.

    Your interpretation of my wording ("100%") makes it into a straw man which is different than a reasonable reading of the meaning of my comments. You might be correct with that change, but I was not going as far as you did.

    On a possibly related point, I think a very suggestive case has been made that the Ashli Babbit shooting was faked. Does this notion also let the bats loose in your belfry?

    Your parroting of some of my words reminds me again of Mr. Hack. Is that you?

    Replies: @A123

  456. @Another Polish Perspective
    @24th Alabama

    I would say that he is someone who yearns for "eternal return", and is looking for it wherever he can (today: in Japan), even rightly so as "return" and kind of " organic holism" was a fundamental concept of many pre-Christian cultures. Interestingly, he is drawn to Buddhims which is based on the idea of eternal return too.

    But he does not want to see that linear eschatology is more in tune with scientific worldview and its "panta rhei", and that even his beloved Old Believers lived in the expectation of the Last Judgement. He wants Old Believers without Last Judgement, as for him they became primarily a vehicle of Russian essence, which in itself could be counted as a sin against the First Commandment.

    Replies: @Another Polish Perspective

    But you can learn from him a lot about Russia.

    I, for example, have learnt today from him that Russia had fighting monks too…. and that “Black Sotnias” of the late Romanov empire got their name from that bygone phenomenon (actually, as you would expect from the name of any conservative organisation).

    • Thanks: Mr. XYZ
  457. @Mikhail
    @Mr. XYZ


    From a geopolitical and strategic point of view, Russia should have simply supported Hungarian independence back in 1848-1849. No one could have stopped them. They would have annexed Galicia for themselves and secured a sphere of influence for themselves in Hungary, thus paving the way for the long-term expansion of the Russian sphere of influence further south into the Balkans without Austria opposing them.
     
    Pan-monarchist empire commitment which the Habsburgs didn't reciprocally honor some years later.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    That’s the thing: Russia should have looked out more for its strategic interests and less for some broad concepts such as pan-monarchical solidarity.

    As a side note, though, if Russia was actually going to go for the latter, then it should have negotiated with Austria(-Hungary) to give them a sphere of influence in the Balkans in order to reduce tensions between them and Russia.

  458. @Mr. Hack
    @Ivashka the fool

    So "blood and soil" is out for your own children, and "karmic influences" is in. I would think that this is so with most young folks in the world today, especially if they're born and raised in the diaspora. And the world is becoming more and more of a "global village" as the nationalism that was born of a different century slides into the background. Perhaps, Karlin has come to this realization forcing him into his newest reincarnation?

    I'm not trying to pick on you and have seen similar approaches by many Ukrainian families in the diaspora. "Blood and soil" was literally a very prevalent philosophy embraced by many Ukrainian immigrants after WWII. Where are their offspring today? Most all are caught up in the Darwinian game of carving out a niche within the complicated game of survival, that often doesn't include sentimental attachments to the "old country".

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Coconuts

    The global village:

    I still remember the day when I gave them a sentence from the Guermantes Way to write a commentary on:

    The purity of her blood, where for many generations only what was greatest in the history of France was to be found, had removed from her way of being anything like what men of the people might call ‘fancy airs’ and had granted her the most perfect simplicity of manner.

    I looked at Ben, scratching his head and his balls, chewing his gum. What would he understand about that, the big ape? What would any of them understand about it? Even for myself, I was starting to have trouble understanding what Proust meant exactly. Dozens of pages about purity of blood, the nobility of genius compared to the nobility of blood, the specific social milieu of great professors of medicine… all of it seemed completely tedious.

    Nowadays we were living in a more simplified world, evidently. The duchess of Guermantes had a lot less cash than Snoop Dog; Snoop Dog has a lot less cash than Bill Gates but he made the girls a lot wetter. Two parameters at most, nothing more.

    In the global market square now I think there is a third vector of value; oppressed/oppressor. Things have become more complex since the late 90s. So there is the cash one, the sexual market value one and the oppressed/oppressor one.

    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @Coconuts


    In the global market square now I think there is a third vector of value; oppressed/oppressor. Things have become more complex since the late 90s. So there is the cash one, the sexual market value one and the oppressed/oppressor one.
     
    This may be, but how does this relate to the theme of Nationality that Ivashka and I are discussing?

    Are you saying that social status has supplanted nationality in the Global Village?

    A really good (and old) album by Tor Dietrichson. It's too bad that he hasn't put out more of his own music?...

    https://open.spotify.com/track/3TLKSu6qIIUkRQ5dmPudi7?si=40fea15459324db3
  459. @Ivashka the fool
    @Mr. Hack

    Nations are also structured around myths, secular ones, of post-Enlightment type: liberté, égalité, fraternité (donnez-moi du thé). Compared to the Old Faith mythology that permeated the whole of our ancestors' existence, these rationalist national mythologies are weak and frail, fake and gay.

    AP was right when he provided the excerpt from the "Into the heart of darkness" book above. The European philosophers who provided the basis for the nation-building did a disservice to the Mankind. Bloodlines are what matters, spiritual bonds are what matters, networks are what matters. Nation myths look like they were written by ChatGPT 3.0. They are simplistic and unfit for evolution.

    Besides, Russian people have never reached the stage where they would have become a nation, therefore I have never been a nationalist, more of a tribalist of an extended Balto-Slav, Y haplogroup R1a kind (nor even sure whether it might be called nationalism at all).

    Of course, my kids have nothing to do with all that, they are living in a completely different reality. A reality of networking and collaborating on a global scale, on the level of which the fratricidal sensless warfare between two branches of Eastern Slavs looks absurd bordering on obscene. When they talk about the war there, they talk with compassion, but also disdain. And they are right. What happens there is a bloody shame, disgusting in its sheer cruel stupidity.

    It must end ASAP.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

    The European philosophers who provided the basis for the nation-building did a disservice to the Mankind. Bloodlines are what matters, spiritual bonds are what matters, networks are what matters. Nation myths look like they were written by ChatGPT 3.0. They are simplistic and unfit for evolution.

    Can’t say that I really agree with you here. Your children’s blood lines have been mixed, are they missing out on some deeper moorings or grounding? By your own admission, they probably will never feel a need to submit to an old fashioned reliance on “blood and soil”. Blood lines will continue to mix as time goes on. Spiritual bonds (or lack of) is closer to an intellectual acquiescence to some sort of philosophy or network of belonging than any sort of biological markers or DNA. From what I’ve read, ChatGPT is quite flexible, “soil and bloodlines” seem much more rigid. 🙂

  460. @AP
    @Beckow


    Ukie nationalists burnt to death 49 Russians in Odessa in May 2014
     
    You just keep lying. The number is wrong, and you lie by omission by ignoring preceding events:

    - Several days earlier, Russian mobs violently took the streets of Donetsk.

    - On that day in Odessa, violent Russian mobs attacked a pro-Ukrainian mob for the purpose of capturing Odessa, as had been done in Donetsk. First person killed was a pro -Ukrainian.

    - Odessa is not Donetsk. The pro-Russian mob that started the violence and the killing was defeated and driven back to its headquarters.

    The deaths in the building by a fire that started when both sides were throwing Molotov cocktails at each other was a tragedy but the fact that the violent pro-Russian mob failed to seize Odessa was a good thing.

    Compounding the tragedy, Russian propagandists lied about if as you do, creating a fake story of a deliberate massacre initiated by the Ukrainians, coming to your town. This fake story was helpful in creating the conditions for the civil war/Russian invasion that followed, and that killed orders of magnitude more people (mostly Russian-speakers) than died in Odessa.


    Kiev says they will reconquer all Russian speaking territories
     
    I hope it doesn’t, but after Russia invaded Ukraine, Ukraine has a right to.

    If Kiev takes Donbas they will they kill-and-expel millions of Russians living there who chose not to a part of Ukraine
     
    Like Czechs did to the Sudeten Germans? Doubtful. More likely is that the hardcore Russian nationalists will leave but many of the rest will just get by.

    “And a large percentage of those Russian speakers, and majority of Ukraine’s population, supported that.”

    No they didn’t – a few years later 70% of Ukraine voted for Zelko when he promised peace and rights for the Russian speakers
     

    You think that this is why most Galicians and most Kievans voted for Zelensky? Don’t lie.

    In the first round the candidates that actually did want to have Russian as a regional language (Boyko and Vilkul) only got 16% of the vote altogether. BRW Vilkul is involved in the fight against Russia now.

    Polls consistently show that the majority of Russian speakers in Ukraine support having Ukrainian as the only state language. Now, prior to 2014 it had it been a majority, but it is now.


    It also makes no difference if some members of the Russian minority under pressure of war or out of fear say in public that “we don’t need any language rights or schools” – that is irrelevant: in Europe these minority rights are a given
     
    1. In some of Europe. Not in France. Not in the Baltics.

    2. It is not given against the wishes of the minority itself, is it?


    If you surveyed the Poles left in Germany in the middle of WW2 they would also noisily claim that “we don’t need any Polish rights, we are actually Silesian-Germans”, or whatever

     

    A lie if applied to most Poles.

    in Czechia, they even managed to get half a million Czechs to demonstrate the eternal loyalty to Germany after the Heydrich assassination – and the unit wiping out Lidice as a reprisal was led by Czechs who overnight became
     
    Poles, Ukrainians and Russians are not Czechs or Slovaks. Though we can not trust your words that what you claim about Czechs is even true.

    Wars are like that, people try to survive or ingratiate themselves to the local power.
     
    Confession of Beckow, the eternal lackey. Those 16 year old heroes in occupied Zaporizhia were not like that.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    Poles, Ukrainians and Russians are not Czechs or Slovaks. Though we can not trust your words that what you claim about Czechs is even true.

    Didn’t the Czechs “demonstrate loyalty” to the Nazis as a result of Nazi threats and/or Nazi incentives (money)? So, it wasn’t genuine loyalty.

    A lie if applied to most Poles.

    Western Upper Silesian Poles did vote to remain a part of Germany back in 1921, though I don’t know if that meant that they did not want Polish language rights within Germany. In very late Imperial German Reichstag elections, the Polish Party primarily won in eastern Upper Silesia, not in western Upper Silesia.

    1. In some of Europe. Not in France. Not in the Baltics.

    So, Anatol Lieven is wrong here by not mentioning France, right?

    https://www.thenation.com/article/world/ukraine-russia-nationalism-war/

    “This process always required a certain amount of conscious deceit. Thus, a Western diplomat tasked with reporting for the OSCE on the compliance of Latvia’s education laws with minority rights admitted to me that he deliberately lied, in order that Latvia should be able to join the Council of Europe, an essential step on the path to EU membership. Western liberal governments and the media ignored promises made by the Latvian and Estonian governments to their Russian minorities before independence, and have tolerated restrictions on minority rights that they would have vehemently denounced anywhere else.”

    • Replies: @AP
    @Mr. XYZ

    Yes, of course Lieven was wrong.

  461. AP says:
    @Mikhail
    @AP


    Rus had an outpost in Crimea. The Crimean Tatars are of course descended from a mix of Tatar invaders and Greeks, Ostrogoths and others who lived there from ancient times. Saying that those people trace back only to the 13th century is as dumb as claiming that Turks in Turkey are some kind of newcomers.
     
    The slave trading Tatar Khanate came after (not before) the Rus Slav presence in Crimea. As noted -

    Tatars were never a majority in Crimea from the 1897 census to the present, in addition to not having predated the Rus Slav presence there. To simply say that the Tatars are a mix of different people in Crimea including those predating the Rus Slav presence suggestively omits that the same can be said of Rus Slavs, in addition to noting that the core group associated with the Crimean Tatars came after the Rus Slav presence.

    Replies: @AP

    Tatars were never a majority in Crimea from the 1897 census to the present

    But they outnumbered Russians in 1897 and Russians themselves did not become a majority until World War II.

    To simply say that the Tatars are a mix of different people in Crimea including those predating the Rus Slav presence

    That’s not an implication but a statement of fact. In Crimea, the Tatars absorbed the Greeks, Ostrogoths and others who had previously been living there.

    Also the medieval Rus presence in Crimea was only in a small corner near the Kerch strait. Perhaps 1% of Crimea’s territory. Most of that principality was in what is now the Russian side of the strait.

    So your argument manages to be stupid on two levels: Crimean Tatars are descended from the pre-Tatar invasion inhabitants; and, the medieval Rus didn’t rule 99% of Crimean territory.

    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @AP

    Ouch!

    , @Mikhail
    @AP


    But they outnumbered Russians in 1897 and Russians themselves did not become a majority until World War II
     
    By a whopping 2% margin of roughly 35% to 33%. Your other idiotic comments are Soros new history like. The Tatars didn't predate the Rus Slav presence. In more present times, the Tatars are a clear minority in Crimea. The Tatars "absorbed" as in not having been there first.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @AP

  462. @Ivashka the fool
    @Another Polish Perspective

    What would have happened in Japan if accepting Christianity (Latin rite Catholicism to be more specific) would have been what unfortunately happened in ancient Rus during its (protracted) conversion. In Rus, the Christianisation took a dozen generations at least, probably more.

    People had Christian names given to them at the baptism, but they also had Slavic nicknames that they used on a dayly basis. They went to church on holidays, but still told pagan byliny in which Ilya Muromets shots down the crosses from atop the Kievan churches. If vityazi warriors going to battle, met with a (chernets) monk, then it was seen as a bad omen, and they even sometimes killed the poor man outright to conjure the evil spell. The anonymous bard who composed the The Tale of the Igor's Campaign, writing in the late twelve century, wrote a pagan poem citing Old Gods and claiming that the Rus were their children. That was 200 years after Vladimir the Khazar maiden's son betrayal of his heroic father's Faith.

    It was only after the Mongol conquest, due to the genocide that was unleashed on southern Rus, and to the protection the Mongols awarded to the Church (the Mongols forbade aggression and plunder of the Church domains and exempted it from paying taxes) that Christianity ultimately completely prevailed against paganism in the popular Rus masses. But even then the resulting Russian Orthodoxy was different from the Greek Byzantine faith and the Greeks were often described as hypocrite and crafty.

    The Russian version was more Nordic, way more open minded towards the other religions, and way less obsessed with worldly wealth and power. It's greatest representatives, such as Sergius of Radonezh, were not afraid to work hard themselves with their own hands building their own monasteries in remote wilderness (that's where the Russian name for a large monastery - pustyn' comes from) instead of building it as close as possible to a market as they did in Western Europe at the time. The monasteries also had battle ready monk units, the famous black hundreds, in case of Tatar, Cheremiss or Lithuanian attacks. Monks in these units seem to have been known by their pagan names, such as Peresvet and Oslyabya brothers who Sergius sent along the Prince Dmitry to battle the Mamai's Tatar troops, their Genoan mercenaries and their Lithuanian allies who luckily arrived too late for the battle, turned around and went back to the Rus lands that they have already submitted due to their elites being cowards seduced by the Latin Church.

    Only when the Czar Aleksey Mikhailovich brought the Raskol ruin upon the Russian lands, had the spiritual backbone of the nation been broken but it still unfortunately happened despite the sacrifice of the best among the nobility and the clergy. And the Jesuit educated Greek and Maloross popes were at the forefront of the religious reforms, instilling their poison in the Russian society. A poison that helped Peter the Great turning Russians into the same enserfed bydlo that Maloross, Ruthenian and Polish peasants have been turned into centuries before with the warm blessing of the Latin Church.

    The Japanese would have ended the same, despite all their exceptional character - slaves in their own lands, their traditions trampled, their spirit distorted and erased. This is what happens with those who betray their ancestors, the Japanese didn't betray theirs, that is why their land is still the Land of the Rising Sun. They did the right thing stomping the Jesuit vermin.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @Another Polish Perspective

    What would have happened in Japan if accepting Christianity (Latin rite Catholicism to be more specific) would have been what unfortunately happened in ancient Rus during its (protracted) conversion.

    Oh, I have forgotten for a moment your Russian ideas about corrupting character of Latin Christianity.
    But wait, there would be another choice… hypocrisy.
    The phenomenon of marranos, always suspected of crypto-Judaism and religious hypocrisy, is a good counterexample to your notion of overpowering, corrupting nature of Christianity as the phenomenon reportedly lasted until 19th century and probably was ended not by Inquisition but by appearance of other ways to express their identity (as the Sephardi Jewish community, unlike the Ashkenazi one, has never developed any forms of extreme piety like Chasidism).

    The most probable outcome for successfully Christianized Japan would be a very particular form of national Christianity, which would join the ranks of Catholicism along other so called national versions of Catholic Christianity like Maronites, or maybe even would become Church in its own right like the Armenian Apostolic Church.

    Let us also not forget that Jesuits were suspected of state-building ambitions not just in Nagasaki in Japan, but also by the Portuguese crown in Brazil and the Spanish crown in Paraguay. As our sources to Christian persecutions in Japan are mainly Jesuit ones, we cannot objectively judge what role such ambitions could play in their relationships with Japanese daimos.

  463. @Anatoly Karlin
    @AP


    If China invaded and occupied parts of Russia would you denigrate the sacrifice of those who resist by saying “RusFed is unworthy of dying for?”
     
    Yes, I would. Under almost any such scenario, the background is that Russia became a lapdog for American neocons, e.g. in the event that Khodorkovsky types and/or White Rex take over post-Putin. Under such conditions, it would not be unreasonable for the Chinese to intervene to contain the threat.

    In light of the above, I would not want Russians to spill their blood for American neocon interests and would consider those who think otherwise to be naive idiots at best, in light of the population and GDP differential between RF and China; and I would consider those Russian leaders and activists who try to force Russians who disagree to sacrifice themselves (e.g. through conscription and border closures) to be degenerates deserving of summary extermination, and would have no compunctions about reporting their coordinates to the PLA in order to accelerate the end of the conflict.

    The optimal strategy overall would be surrender ASAP and let the W*stoids and Chinese duke it out for world hegemony. Flip sides to whoever's winning near the end.

    Replies: @silviosilver, @Yahya, @Mr. XYZ

    Out of curiosity: Do you believe that Russia was wrong to force unwilling young men to risk their lives in World War I? Should it have exclusively relied on volunteers for its war effort?

    Basically, Russia’s WWI war effort faltered because Russian normies stopped understanding what they were being sacrificed for. Do you really think that Constantinople and Galicia (both places where it’s highly uncertain that Imperial Russia would have won a free and fair plebiscite anyway) were actually worth millions of young Russian lives? If so, then shouldn’t Russia have been capable of finding enough volunteers for the task of conquering these territories as opposed to having it rely on conscription for this purpose?

    BTW, had Russia stopped its WWI war effort before the Bolsheviks would have seized power, the Bolshevik coup would have likely been avoided, as would the subsequent Bolshevik tyranny and WWII (due to Germany possibly winning WWI, and also due to no scary Bolshevik bogeyman in the East for the Nazis to utilize in order for them to gain power in Germany in the first place).

    • Replies: @Anatoly Karlin
    @Mr. XYZ

    It was justifiable by the standards of the time since it was the universal thing to do (including even with the UK in 1916) and it was not the primary aggressor party.

    The scenario AP posited is one in which China invades Russia after the post-color revolution Russian regime behaves threateningly and provokes it in service of American neocons. In that case, conscription would be immoral and indefensible, and any Russian leader who orders it or agent who helps enforce it on the ground would be a legitimate target for assassination. The correct approach would be to surrender and let the Chinese and Westerners fight it out. It can join the winning side and possibly do some opportunistic territorial grabs and/or ethnic cleansing (though that would not be moral) from the loser parties at the very end. But that is generally the smart, high IQ thing to do. The Czechs overall had a relatively happy 20C.

    Replies: @Greasy William, @Mr. XYZ, @Mr. XYZ

    , @Wokechoke
    @Mr. XYZ

    Nah, the Russians went easy on Jews for too long. Imperialism in Russia was open to all, except Jews. The Bolsheviks ended that. Handed Jews power.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

  464. @Coconuts
    @Mr. Hack

    The global village:


    I still remember the day when I gave them a sentence from the Guermantes Way to write a commentary on:

    The purity of her blood, where for many generations only what was greatest in the history of France was to be found, had removed from her way of being anything like what men of the people might call 'fancy airs' and had granted her the most perfect simplicity of manner.

    I looked at Ben, scratching his head and his balls, chewing his gum. What would he understand about that, the big ape? What would any of them understand about it? Even for myself, I was starting to have trouble understanding what Proust meant exactly. Dozens of pages about purity of blood, the nobility of genius compared to the nobility of blood, the specific social milieu of great professors of medicine... all of it seemed completely tedious.

    Nowadays we were living in a more simplified world, evidently. The duchess of Guermantes had a lot less cash than Snoop Dog; Snoop Dog has a lot less cash than Bill Gates but he made the girls a lot wetter. Two parameters at most, nothing more.
     

    In the global market square now I think there is a third vector of value; oppressed/oppressor. Things have become more complex since the late 90s. So there is the cash one, the sexual market value one and the oppressed/oppressor one.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

    In the global market square now I think there is a third vector of value; oppressed/oppressor. Things have become more complex since the late 90s. So there is the cash one, the sexual market value one and the oppressed/oppressor one.

    This may be, but how does this relate to the theme of Nationality that Ivashka and I are discussing?

    Are you saying that social status has supplanted nationality in the Global Village?

    A really good (and old) album by Tor Dietrichson. It’s too bad that he hasn’t put out more of his own music?…

  465. @AP
    @Mikhail


    Tatars were never a majority in Crimea from the 1897 census to the present
     
    But they outnumbered Russians in 1897 and Russians themselves did not become a majority until World War II.

    To simply say that the Tatars are a mix of different people in Crimea including those predating the Rus Slav presence

     

    That’s not an implication but a statement of fact. In Crimea, the Tatars absorbed the Greeks, Ostrogoths and others who had previously been living there.

    Also the medieval Rus presence in Crimea was only in a small corner near the Kerch strait. Perhaps 1% of Crimea’s territory. Most of that principality was in what is now the Russian side of the strait.

    So your argument manages to be stupid on two levels: Crimean Tatars are descended from the pre-Tatar invasion inhabitants; and, the medieval Rus didn’t rule 99% of Crimean territory.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @Mikhail

    Ouch!

  466. @Yevardian
    @Beckow

    The very public ovation Wagner received whilst leaving Rostov seems to imply otherwise.

    No defender of Prigozhin here, but Shoigu is worse.

    Replies: @Beckow, @Gerard1234

    The very public ovation Wagner received whilst leaving Rostov seems to imply otherwise.

    No defender of Prigozhin here, but Shoigu is worse.

    Shoigu is one of the most competent people on the planet. Seriously brilliant guy. TWO government departments he has greatly and perceptibly improved.

    The public ovation was after the whole issue was resolved/people on saturday night happy they can go to the bars/nightclubs etc now. So, of course the Wagner fighters were applauded with all the heroic acts they have done in the last year as with all Russian military. Plus, without any actual dead people on the streets, people just like the excitement and fame of the situation.

    Assuming that the aircraft downed is false ( even with what Putin has said, and with Wagners assets including many air defence complexes, the idea that a convoy in motion is going to have downed that many, and such a different array of planes/helicopters – with no sane explanation of why 3 of those types of aircraft would even be in that situation, and suffered no sucessful strikes on themselves……is deranged) or that the civilians there were not aware of it – then why wouldn’t they cheer heroic patriots of Russia? Nothing suggesting they are going to applaud Wagner and start being against the regular Russian military. Nobody wants a former hero turned traitor situation as with ROA/Vlasov. Now that the guys have resolved the situation, of course the people on the streets are applauding.

    This was all over an administrative issue, that had de facto been decided or resolved with Wagner fighters majority perfectly OK with being directly under MOD. At best it appears this was pitiful attempt by Prigozhin to change this de facto reality.

    Situation resolved.

    As for the Etruscan stuff ( thanks for your comment), not that I necessarily believe it , but several Russian historians ( ok, several of them just amatuers) have claimed it. Some saying they are from Russian steppe, others that they went from Italy to northern Russia/Baltics/Finland. Not a majority at all of historians but some….but if you take 10 different historians from around the world there seems to be about 10 different opinions of where Etruscans came from or went to after. Numerous words from their language are supposed to have filtrated into slavic. My point was mainly about ridiculing these Baltic TsIPSO retards for plaigirising the Etruscan theory as their own, and even trying to use it to make a positive PR BS on Baltics biggest disaster since 1991. That, and the ludicrous level of claiming they were Baltics and Ukrops….but not Russian.

  467. This may be, but how does this relate to the theme of Nationality that Ivashka and I are discussing?

    I see that Ivashka wanted to discuss tribalism or a type of political and spiritual community he judges to be valuable rather than nationalism, because nationalism is a variable thing. Originally nationalism may have been a form specific to Western Europe, originating in late medieval or early modern times.

    Are you saying that social status has supplanted nationality in the Global Village?

    That the Global Village is more a global marketplace where the criteria of status are likely to be crude and reductive, because that will be the nature of a voluntaristic community existing on that scale.

    I think one aspect of the radical case Ivashka is putting forward is that there are hereditary social bonds which pre-exist the individual (they help produce the individual) and that they are not the result of personal acts of will. Otoh breaking them may require an act of will.

    For example I am a Christian, but it is something I inherited from my parents, who got it from their grandparents, who ultimately got it from when Ireland was converted in the early dark ages. That was probably a collective decision. Where I live is more or less where my ancestors must have chosen to live 4-6,000 years ago, if those modern genetic tests are reliable.

    In the global village these sort of things are less visible, unless convertible into cash value or smv (the latter would be more applicable when I was younger).

    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @Coconuts

    And tribalism, political and spiritual communities are not variable?


    In the global village these sort of thiease elaboratengs are less visible, unless convertible into cash value or smv (the latter would be more applicable when I was younger).
     
    I'm not quite following you here. Please elaborate a bit more. "smv" small moving vehicle?

    Replies: @Coconuts

  468. @Mr. XYZ
    @Anatoly Karlin

    Out of curiosity: Do you believe that Russia was wrong to force unwilling young men to risk their lives in World War I? Should it have exclusively relied on volunteers for its war effort?

    Basically, Russia's WWI war effort faltered because Russian normies stopped understanding what they were being sacrificed for. Do you really think that Constantinople and Galicia (both places where it's highly uncertain that Imperial Russia would have won a free and fair plebiscite anyway) were actually worth millions of young Russian lives? If so, then shouldn't Russia have been capable of finding enough volunteers for the task of conquering these territories as opposed to having it rely on conscription for this purpose?

    BTW, had Russia stopped its WWI war effort before the Bolsheviks would have seized power, the Bolshevik coup would have likely been avoided, as would the subsequent Bolshevik tyranny and WWII (due to Germany possibly winning WWI, and also due to no scary Bolshevik bogeyman in the East for the Nazis to utilize in order for them to gain power in Germany in the first place).

    Replies: @Anatoly Karlin, @Wokechoke

    It was justifiable by the standards of the time since it was the universal thing to do (including even with the UK in 1916) and it was not the primary aggressor party.

    The scenario AP posited is one in which China invades Russia after the post-color revolution Russian regime behaves threateningly and provokes it in service of American neocons. In that case, conscription would be immoral and indefensible, and any Russian leader who orders it or agent who helps enforce it on the ground would be a legitimate target for assassination. The correct approach would be to surrender and let the Chinese and Westerners fight it out. It can join the winning side and possibly do some opportunistic territorial grabs and/or ethnic cleansing (though that would not be moral) from the loser parties at the very end. But that is generally the smart, high IQ thing to do. The Czechs overall had a relatively happy 20C.

    • Replies: @Greasy William
    @Anatoly Karlin

    I know that you know that Americans will never agree to fight against China. What are you getting out of pretending otherwise?

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    , @Mr. XYZ
    @Anatoly Karlin


    It was justifiable by the standards of the time since it was the universal thing to do (including even with the UK in 1916) and it was not the primary aggressor party.
     
    Isn't conscription still justified by contemporary standards since a lot of countries even nowadays still practice it, though? And even some of the ones that don't are a part of a much more powerful military alliance such as NATO which gives them the luxury of avoiding conscription, a luxury that Ukraine unfortunately does not have (not yet, at least).

    The scenario AP posited is one in which China invades Russia after the post-color revolution Russian regime behaves threateningly and provokes it in service of American neocons. In that case, conscription would be immoral and indefensible, and any Russian leader who orders it or agent who helps enforce it on the ground would be a legitimate target for assassination. The correct approach would be to surrender and let the Chinese and Westerners fight it out. It can join the winning side and possibly do some opportunistic territorial grabs and/or ethnic cleansing (though that would not be moral) from the loser parties at the very end. But that is generally the smart, high IQ thing to do. The Czechs overall had a relatively happy 20C.
     
    What if the West won't be interested in coming to Russia's defense, though? It's similar to Ukraine in 2022: Had the Ukrainians refused to fight, the West wouldn't have been coming to their defense. Even giving Ukrainians weapons to fight an anti-Russian insurgency is contingent on Ukrainians actually being willing to fight.

    As for the Czechs, had Hitler not made any moves on Poland (or Danzig, which would have likely still triggered a Polish war), Germany might have remained in control of Czechia up to the present-day, in which case the Czechs might have to endure cultural genocide (similar to pre-WWI Germany with Poles, or perhaps harsher depending on just how long Nazism will remain viable as a political movement in Germany without WWII) and attempts to encourage them to emigrate en masse and/or to Germanize them (for the "racially fit" elements among them, in Nazi eyes). That would have been far from an ideal 20th century for them: Having their statehood be destroyed, possibly permanently, and ending up like the Sorbs in the long-run. They'd have avoided Communism, but still, cultural genocide is one hell of a bitch!

    From a Czech perspective, had Hitler not moved onto Poland/Danzig later on, it would have likely been preferable to fight over the Sudetenland in 1938 had the Anglo-French actually been willing to likewise do so. At least Czechoslovak statehood would be likely preserved that way. ("Likely" because theoretically speaking, France can still fall, and if the Nazis get lucky they can subsequently defeat and conquer the Soviet Union, but that's probably not the most likely scenario with a 1938 WWII PoD.)

    BTW, if Russia still has at least nuclear parity with China, if not an outright nuclear advantage over China, then I suspect that Russia will respond to any Chinese attack on Russian territory with nuclear weapons. This is true even for a pro-Western post-Putin Russia. There's a risk of a catastrophic escalation but also a very seriously possibility of China backing down and retreating in response to this.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    , @Mr. XYZ
    @Anatoly Karlin

    BTW, what are your thoughts on having a pro-Western post-Putin Russia join the EU in order to achieve greater economies of scale, at least if doing this can be done without severely pissing off China? Russia within the EU would get to be a part of a 600-million-strong confederation, 700-million-strong if Turkey will also eventually join it.

    The EU might pale in comparison to the US and China, but it's still more impressive than India and the rest of the world. 500+ million mostly high-quality people is nothing to scoff at! And they still do a lot of R & D spending, elite science production, et cetera, mostly in its western half.

    And what do you think about Garett Jones's argument that natalism would still be relevant even in the AI age because just like smarter people are capable of using search engines more effectively (through better keywords/search phrases), smarter people are also going to be capable of using AI more effectively (through better questions for the AI)? I suspect that he has a point. Give a smart and a dull person a search engine and the smart person will likely be capable of utilizing it more effectively for research relative to a duller person. There's still likely to be some premium for greater intelligence/brainpower/creativity here. FWIW, I support natalism for the entire Western world, not just for Russia, though I do think that Russia needs it more badly than much of the rest of the West due to Russia's current underpopulation.

    BTW, I find it interesting that Germanic (and Germanic-influenced, such as Ireland) countries are the world's most attractive ones for skilled workers:

    https://www.oecd.org/migration/talent-attractiveness/

    Probably because they're so competently run and there's a lot of achievement there in terms of R & D spending, elite science production, et cetera.

    Replies: @Anatoly Karlin

  469. @Anatoly Karlin
    @Mr. XYZ

    It was justifiable by the standards of the time since it was the universal thing to do (including even with the UK in 1916) and it was not the primary aggressor party.

    The scenario AP posited is one in which China invades Russia after the post-color revolution Russian regime behaves threateningly and provokes it in service of American neocons. In that case, conscription would be immoral and indefensible, and any Russian leader who orders it or agent who helps enforce it on the ground would be a legitimate target for assassination. The correct approach would be to surrender and let the Chinese and Westerners fight it out. It can join the winning side and possibly do some opportunistic territorial grabs and/or ethnic cleansing (though that would not be moral) from the loser parties at the very end. But that is generally the smart, high IQ thing to do. The Czechs overall had a relatively happy 20C.

    Replies: @Greasy William, @Mr. XYZ, @Mr. XYZ

    I know that you know that Americans will never agree to fight against China. What are you getting out of pretending otherwise?

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @Greasy William

    Taiwan?

    Replies: @Greasy William

  470. @Anatoly Karlin
    @silviosilver

    I am looking forwards to American neocons utilizing r*ghtoid subhumans like yourself in the war against China.

    I'd just prefer that demographic doesn't include many Russians.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    You’re absolutely correct that Russia has no business fighting against China. This is why I strongly suspect that Western efforts to turn Russia against China are doomed to fail: Simply because Russia has little to gain from such efforts. However, I also think that Russia had no business invading Ukraine in 2022 or fighting WWI for that matter, especially considering that the potential gains from that war were not worth millions of dead young Russians even in the event of victory.

    As a side note, do you think that Putin would have accepted a deal where the West would have accepted his December 2021 ultimatum in its entirety in exchange for Putin withdrawing from the SCO, ending all Russian military cooperation with China, and promising in writing to launch a trade embargo against China in the event that China will ever attack Taiwan? Frankly, I strongly doubt it because Putin would have suspected that he can have both Ukraine and close ties with China and thus wouldn’t need to choose between the two of them. This is also why I suspect that Vivek Rawasmany’s plan to separate Russia from China is unlikely to work.

    BTW, do you think that Serbia should have immediately surrendered in 1914 in order to save lives? And ditto for Poland in 1939? (Polish resistance did not prevent the overwhelming majority of Polish Jews from getting murdered for the Nazis and only made things worse for the ethnic Poles; had Poland quickly surrendered, there’s a very real chance that ethnic Poles would have gotten the Czech treatment, though Polish Jews would have of course still been fucked. Though a considerably larger percentage of Polish Jews could have potentially been saved had Poland outright allied with Nazi Germany rather than merely quickly surrendering to Nazi Germany. Pre-1944 Hungary’s, Romania’s, and Bulgaria’s Jews all fared much better relative to Poland’s Jews, after all.)

    Also, shouldn’t small countries such as the Baltic countries quickly surrender in the event of a hypothetical Russian invasion and instead wait for NATO to liberate them? Isn’t that the most optimal strategy for them? (France’s unintentional move to lose quickly in 1940 ensured that WWII would not hit it anywhere near as hard as it would hit both Germany and the Soviet Union, while still ensuring that France would be an official winner of WWII at the very end thanks to De Gaulle’s Free French Forces.) Interestingly enough, had Ukraine actually been a part of NATO, which Russia strongly didn’t want, then Ukraine could have actually afforded the strategy of surrendering quickly since NATO would have subsequently liberated it from Russia. But Ukraine unfortunately did and does not have that kind of luxury like the Baltic countries have.

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @Mr. XYZ

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=WeVWupFBkA8

    Why Italy is Great…

    Replies: @Yahya, @S

  471. @Mr. XYZ
    @AP


    Poles, Ukrainians and Russians are not Czechs or Slovaks. Though we can not trust your words that what you claim about Czechs is even true.
     
    Didn't the Czechs "demonstrate loyalty" to the Nazis as a result of Nazi threats and/or Nazi incentives (money)? So, it wasn't genuine loyalty.

    A lie if applied to most Poles.
     
    Western Upper Silesian Poles did vote to remain a part of Germany back in 1921, though I don't know if that meant that they did not want Polish language rights within Germany. In very late Imperial German Reichstag elections, the Polish Party primarily won in eastern Upper Silesia, not in western Upper Silesia.

    1. In some of Europe. Not in France. Not in the Baltics.
     
    So, Anatol Lieven is wrong here by not mentioning France, right?

    https://www.thenation.com/article/world/ukraine-russia-nationalism-war/

    "This process always required a certain amount of conscious deceit. Thus, a Western diplomat tasked with reporting for the OSCE on the compliance of Latvia’s education laws with minority rights admitted to me that he deliberately lied, in order that Latvia should be able to join the Council of Europe, an essential step on the path to EU membership. Western liberal governments and the media ignored promises made by the Latvian and Estonian governments to their Russian minorities before independence, and have tolerated restrictions on minority rights that they would have vehemently denounced anywhere else."

    Replies: @AP

    Yes, of course Lieven was wrong.

    • Thanks: Mr. XYZ
  472. @Coconuts

    This may be, but how does this relate to the theme of Nationality that Ivashka and I are discussing?
     
    I see that Ivashka wanted to discuss tribalism or a type of political and spiritual community he judges to be valuable rather than nationalism, because nationalism is a variable thing. Originally nationalism may have been a form specific to Western Europe, originating in late medieval or early modern times.

    Are you saying that social status has supplanted nationality in the Global Village?
     
    That the Global Village is more a global marketplace where the criteria of status are likely to be crude and reductive, because that will be the nature of a voluntaristic community existing on that scale.

    I think one aspect of the radical case Ivashka is putting forward is that there are hereditary social bonds which pre-exist the individual (they help produce the individual) and that they are not the result of personal acts of will. Otoh breaking them may require an act of will.

    For example I am a Christian, but it is something I inherited from my parents, who got it from their grandparents, who ultimately got it from when Ireland was converted in the early dark ages. That was probably a collective decision. Where I live is more or less where my ancestors must have chosen to live 4-6,000 years ago, if those modern genetic tests are reliable.

    In the global village these sort of things are less visible, unless convertible into cash value or smv (the latter would be more applicable when I was younger).

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

    And tribalism, political and spiritual communities are not variable?

    In the global village these sort of thiease elaboratengs are less visible, unless convertible into cash value or smv (the latter would be more applicable when I was younger).

    I’m not quite following you here. Please elaborate a bit more. “smv” small moving vehicle?

    • Replies: @Coconuts
    @Mr. Hack


    And tribalism, political and spiritual communities are not variable?
     
    I mentioned that in the Dark Ages the British Isles switched to Christianity, there was another big change in the 16th century in England and Scotland. Then the political community I am part of traces its founding back to 1066 (though that founding was based on hereditary right) so there are changes. But they used to happen rarely and not so much on a commercial or individual basis.

    I’m not quite following you here. Please elaborate a bit more. “smv” small moving vehicle?
     
    Smv means 'sexual market value'. I think those things I was talking about don't have exchange value, making them into something like an explicit limited term contract would alter what they are. Most people in the world must still live in these sorts of communities near where their ancestors have lived for many generations and where membership comes from inheritance, even with spiritual communities they are often hereditary much of the time.

    Replies: @Yevardian

  473. @Anatoly Karlin
    @Mr. XYZ

    It was justifiable by the standards of the time since it was the universal thing to do (including even with the UK in 1916) and it was not the primary aggressor party.

    The scenario AP posited is one in which China invades Russia after the post-color revolution Russian regime behaves threateningly and provokes it in service of American neocons. In that case, conscription would be immoral and indefensible, and any Russian leader who orders it or agent who helps enforce it on the ground would be a legitimate target for assassination. The correct approach would be to surrender and let the Chinese and Westerners fight it out. It can join the winning side and possibly do some opportunistic territorial grabs and/or ethnic cleansing (though that would not be moral) from the loser parties at the very end. But that is generally the smart, high IQ thing to do. The Czechs overall had a relatively happy 20C.

    Replies: @Greasy William, @Mr. XYZ, @Mr. XYZ

    It was justifiable by the standards of the time since it was the universal thing to do (including even with the UK in 1916) and it was not the primary aggressor party.

    Isn’t conscription still justified by contemporary standards since a lot of countries even nowadays still practice it, though? And even some of the ones that don’t are a part of a much more powerful military alliance such as NATO which gives them the luxury of avoiding conscription, a luxury that Ukraine unfortunately does not have (not yet, at least).

    The scenario AP posited is one in which China invades Russia after the post-color revolution Russian regime behaves threateningly and provokes it in service of American neocons. In that case, conscription would be immoral and indefensible, and any Russian leader who orders it or agent who helps enforce it on the ground would be a legitimate target for assassination. The correct approach would be to surrender and let the Chinese and Westerners fight it out. It can join the winning side and possibly do some opportunistic territorial grabs and/or ethnic cleansing (though that would not be moral) from the loser parties at the very end. But that is generally the smart, high IQ thing to do. The Czechs overall had a relatively happy 20C.

    What if the West won’t be interested in coming to Russia’s defense, though? It’s similar to Ukraine in 2022: Had the Ukrainians refused to fight, the West wouldn’t have been coming to their defense. Even giving Ukrainians weapons to fight an anti-Russian insurgency is contingent on Ukrainians actually being willing to fight.

    As for the Czechs, had Hitler not made any moves on Poland (or Danzig, which would have likely still triggered a Polish war), Germany might have remained in control of Czechia up to the present-day, in which case the Czechs might have to endure cultural genocide (similar to pre-WWI Germany with Poles, or perhaps harsher depending on just how long Nazism will remain viable as a political movement in Germany without WWII) and attempts to encourage them to emigrate en masse and/or to Germanize them (for the “racially fit” elements among them, in Nazi eyes). That would have been far from an ideal 20th century for them: Having their statehood be destroyed, possibly permanently, and ending up like the Sorbs in the long-run. They’d have avoided Communism, but still, cultural genocide is one hell of a bitch!

    From a Czech perspective, had Hitler not moved onto Poland/Danzig later on, it would have likely been preferable to fight over the Sudetenland in 1938 had the Anglo-French actually been willing to likewise do so. At least Czechoslovak statehood would be likely preserved that way. (“Likely” because theoretically speaking, France can still fall, and if the Nazis get lucky they can subsequently defeat and conquer the Soviet Union, but that’s probably not the most likely scenario with a 1938 WWII PoD.)

    BTW, if Russia still has at least nuclear parity with China, if not an outright nuclear advantage over China, then I suspect that Russia will respond to any Chinese attack on Russian territory with nuclear weapons. This is true even for a pro-Western post-Putin Russia. There’s a risk of a catastrophic escalation but also a very seriously possibility of China backing down and retreating in response to this.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @Mr. XYZ


    Isn’t conscription still justified by contemporary standards since a lot of countries even nowadays still practice it, though? And even some of the ones that don’t are a part of a much more powerful military alliance such as NATO which gives them the luxury of avoiding conscription, a luxury that Ukraine unfortunately does not have (not yet, at least).
     
    I was a bit wrong here: Most countries nowadays do not practice conscription. However, even in the Western world, there are several exceptions to this rule: Switzerland, Austria, Finland, Greece, Turkey, South Korea, and Taiwan, in addition to Ukraine, of course. There would have probably been more Western exceptions to this rule had it not been for the existence of the super-powerful NATO alliance. The Baltic countries, at the very least, would have had conscription in such a scenario. Maybe Poland, Czechia, Slovakia, Romania, Serbia, and/or Macedonia as well, especially if Germany, Hungary, and/or Bulgaria would have been making noises about regaining their lost territories (again, while the countries mentioned above would not have had the NATO alliance to protect them).

    Ukraine's current situation is comparable to that of 1939 Poland, were the Anglo-French simply willing to arm Poland but not directly fight for Poland and if Nazi Germany would have only been interested in cultural genocide rather than physical genocide in Poland. In such a scenario, 1939 Poland would have still certainly had conscription.
  474. @Anatoly Karlin
    @Mr. XYZ

    It was justifiable by the standards of the time since it was the universal thing to do (including even with the UK in 1916) and it was not the primary aggressor party.

    The scenario AP posited is one in which China invades Russia after the post-color revolution Russian regime behaves threateningly and provokes it in service of American neocons. In that case, conscription would be immoral and indefensible, and any Russian leader who orders it or agent who helps enforce it on the ground would be a legitimate target for assassination. The correct approach would be to surrender and let the Chinese and Westerners fight it out. It can join the winning side and possibly do some opportunistic territorial grabs and/or ethnic cleansing (though that would not be moral) from the loser parties at the very end. But that is generally the smart, high IQ thing to do. The Czechs overall had a relatively happy 20C.

    Replies: @Greasy William, @Mr. XYZ, @Mr. XYZ

    BTW, what are your thoughts on having a pro-Western post-Putin Russia join the EU in order to achieve greater economies of scale, at least if doing this can be done without severely pissing off China? Russia within the EU would get to be a part of a 600-million-strong confederation, 700-million-strong if Turkey will also eventually join it.

    The EU might pale in comparison to the US and China, but it’s still more impressive than India and the rest of the world. 500+ million mostly high-quality people is nothing to scoff at! And they still do a lot of R & D spending, elite science production, et cetera, mostly in its western half.

    And what do you think about Garett Jones’s argument that natalism would still be relevant even in the AI age because just like smarter people are capable of using search engines more effectively (through better keywords/search phrases), smarter people are also going to be capable of using AI more effectively (through better questions for the AI)? I suspect that he has a point. Give a smart and a dull person a search engine and the smart person will likely be capable of utilizing it more effectively for research relative to a duller person. There’s still likely to be some premium for greater intelligence/brainpower/creativity here. FWIW, I support natalism for the entire Western world, not just for Russia, though I do think that Russia needs it more badly than much of the rest of the West due to Russia’s current underpopulation.

    BTW, I find it interesting that Germanic (and Germanic-influenced, such as Ireland) countries are the world’s most attractive ones for skilled workers:

    https://www.oecd.org/migration/talent-attractiveness/

    Probably because they’re so competently run and there’s a lot of achievement there in terms of R & D spending, elite science production, et cetera.

    • Replies: @Anatoly Karlin
    @Mr. XYZ


    BTW, what are your thoughts on having a pro-Western post-Putin Russia join the EU in order to achieve greater economies of scale...
     
    I would support Russia joining the EU. However, Europe politically reduced to a geographic concept is Eurocentric, exclusionist, and practically racist. As with the US, I would campaign to open up membership to the Middle East, Africa, and beyond (ofc contingent on them adopting democracy, secular liberalism, feminism, LGBT rights, and so forth). While even the EU is historically regressive, to the extent that its expansion undermines the cohesion of the traditional nation-state and moves the world closer to the economies of scale it would enjoy with universal Open Borders, I support it.

    And what do you think about Garett Jones’s argument that natalism would still be relevant even in the AI age
     
    It depends on timelines. Quick AI timelines make it utterly irrelevant. The main focus should be loosening regulations in order to accelerate genomic intelligence augmentation.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Mr. XYZ

  475. @Sean
    @John Johnson

    Great psychological warfare to distract from the fact that Ukraine has not had a victory since November and with a fresh force of superbly equipped and trained ten brigades to play with has nowhere got through or even to the first line of Russian defences on the ground north of Crimea that has been the major Russian gain of the SMO still held to date. Apart from making things up to distract from the PR disaster of the counter offensive fiasco, Kiev decided to launch on of their Storm Shadow missiles, actually the lighter payload French one (maybe more difficult to shoot down) on a key Crimean road link bridge.

    Great thinking if they are goal is to be in their graves, because Russia has threatened that the leadership in Kiev (“decision making centres) would be targeted if the Western long range missiles were used for strikes on those lines of communication to Crimea. I think Ukraine leadership, military equipment and army will be slowly but surely written down that order. Rely on it, a precision assassination of someone in Zelensky's circle is coming in retaliation.

    Replies: @John Johnson, @Wokechoke

    The defense around Tokmak was down to civil engineering. I’d assume that Shoigu and Surovikin will claim that they did it.

    • Replies: @Sean
    @Wokechoke

    That's not true those tank graveyard losses came while they were still approaching the obstacles and main minefields. What happened I think is Russian electronic warfare, which is at long last doing its job, veiled Russian dispositions from drone and even satellite surveillance , so the Ukrainians had to do an actual reconnaissance in force.

    Russia's top general, Valery Gerasimov, is someone rank of rank (incompetence). Or, he is more interested in keeping his job than doing it well. Shoigu is just a cautious bureaucrat who rose because he knew Putin prizes loyalty above all else.

    Because of Putin's reluctance to admit that a SMO will not do it (so he miscalculated initially), and his minions being chosen for thei lack of moral courage, Russia is bumbling along without any determined effort to mobilise its resources to achieve a victory in the foreseeable future. meanwhile the Western countries arsenals are rock bottom so are going to have to start up production lines for all weapons anyway, just to replenish their own reserve stocks. Once that happens supplying Ukraine can be done without running down the West's stocks, and so Ukraine will have quite possibly have access for the first time to a ceaseless flow of arms.

    Yet Russia, which still has a firepower advantage, has not even declared war on Ukraine. The Kremlin is acting like it has all the time in the world.

  476. @Mr. XYZ
    @Anatoly Karlin

    You're absolutely correct that Russia has no business fighting against China. This is why I strongly suspect that Western efforts to turn Russia against China are doomed to fail: Simply because Russia has little to gain from such efforts. However, I also think that Russia had no business invading Ukraine in 2022 or fighting WWI for that matter, especially considering that the potential gains from that war were not worth millions of dead young Russians even in the event of victory.

    As a side note, do you think that Putin would have accepted a deal where the West would have accepted his December 2021 ultimatum in its entirety in exchange for Putin withdrawing from the SCO, ending all Russian military cooperation with China, and promising in writing to launch a trade embargo against China in the event that China will ever attack Taiwan? Frankly, I strongly doubt it because Putin would have suspected that he can have both Ukraine and close ties with China and thus wouldn't need to choose between the two of them. This is also why I suspect that Vivek Rawasmany's plan to separate Russia from China is unlikely to work.

    BTW, do you think that Serbia should have immediately surrendered in 1914 in order to save lives? And ditto for Poland in 1939? (Polish resistance did not prevent the overwhelming majority of Polish Jews from getting murdered for the Nazis and only made things worse for the ethnic Poles; had Poland quickly surrendered, there's a very real chance that ethnic Poles would have gotten the Czech treatment, though Polish Jews would have of course still been fucked. Though a considerably larger percentage of Polish Jews could have potentially been saved had Poland outright allied with Nazi Germany rather than merely quickly surrendering to Nazi Germany. Pre-1944 Hungary's, Romania's, and Bulgaria's Jews all fared much better relative to Poland's Jews, after all.)

    Also, shouldn't small countries such as the Baltic countries quickly surrender in the event of a hypothetical Russian invasion and instead wait for NATO to liberate them? Isn't that the most optimal strategy for them? (France's unintentional move to lose quickly in 1940 ensured that WWII would not hit it anywhere near as hard as it would hit both Germany and the Soviet Union, while still ensuring that France would be an official winner of WWII at the very end thanks to De Gaulle's Free French Forces.) Interestingly enough, had Ukraine actually been a part of NATO, which Russia strongly didn't want, then Ukraine could have actually afforded the strategy of surrendering quickly since NATO would have subsequently liberated it from Russia. But Ukraine unfortunately did and does not have that kind of luxury like the Baltic countries have.

    Replies: @Wokechoke

    Why Italy is Great…

    • Agree: Yahya
    • Replies: @Yahya
    @Wokechoke

    Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth.

    - Matthew 5:5


    https://i.ibb.co/37bqL5K/5830-A2-D4-C6-BB-4607-9555-54-F2909-A09-BC.png

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @silviosilver

    , @S
    @Wokechoke


    Why Italy is Great…
     
    It's kind of interesting that both the circa 1970 war comedies Catch 22 and Kelly's Heros each critiqued some darker aspects of the US armed forces involvement in WWII, ie looting, black marketeering, soldier rape/murders of local women.

    [If it hadn't been for the tolerance of the freewheeling criticisms about the then current US involvement in Vietnam, and that these were comedies, I doubt such things about WWII would of ever been aired in such a public manner.]


    'The penalty for looting is death!

    https://youtu.be/XIzCpvcf6Po

    M & M Enterprises

    https://youtu.be/VjmDGZMU3cQ



    'You killed her?'

    https://youtu.be/FgVwKp84lZ8
  477. @Wokechoke
    @Mr. XYZ

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=WeVWupFBkA8

    Why Italy is Great…

    Replies: @Yahya, @S

    Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth.

    – Matthew 5:5

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @Yahya

    The decisive battle of the 21st century will be Sub-Saharan Africa vs. Gnon lol.

    , @silviosilver
    @Yahya

    Well, whites are the meekest race, so maybe there's hope yet.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Yahya, @Mr. XYZ

  478. @Mr. Hack
    @Coconuts

    And tribalism, political and spiritual communities are not variable?


    In the global village these sort of thiease elaboratengs are less visible, unless convertible into cash value or smv (the latter would be more applicable when I was younger).
     
    I'm not quite following you here. Please elaborate a bit more. "smv" small moving vehicle?

    Replies: @Coconuts

    And tribalism, political and spiritual communities are not variable?

    I mentioned that in the Dark Ages the British Isles switched to Christianity, there was another big change in the 16th century in England and Scotland. Then the political community I am part of traces its founding back to 1066 (though that founding was based on hereditary right) so there are changes. But they used to happen rarely and not so much on a commercial or individual basis.

    I’m not quite following you here. Please elaborate a bit more. “smv” small moving vehicle?

    Smv means ‘sexual market value’. I think those things I was talking about don’t have exchange value, making them into something like an explicit limited term contract would alter what they are. Most people in the world must still live in these sorts of communities near where their ancestors have lived for many generations and where membership comes from inheritance, even with spiritual communities they are often hereditary much of the time.

    • Replies: @Yevardian
    @Coconuts


    Then the political community I am part of traces its founding back to 1066
     
    From some post I don't remember, I thought you were Portuguese.

    Replies: @Coconuts

  479. @Coconuts
    @Mr. Hack


    And tribalism, political and spiritual communities are not variable?
     
    I mentioned that in the Dark Ages the British Isles switched to Christianity, there was another big change in the 16th century in England and Scotland. Then the political community I am part of traces its founding back to 1066 (though that founding was based on hereditary right) so there are changes. But they used to happen rarely and not so much on a commercial or individual basis.

    I’m not quite following you here. Please elaborate a bit more. “smv” small moving vehicle?
     
    Smv means 'sexual market value'. I think those things I was talking about don't have exchange value, making them into something like an explicit limited term contract would alter what they are. Most people in the world must still live in these sorts of communities near where their ancestors have lived for many generations and where membership comes from inheritance, even with spiritual communities they are often hereditary much of the time.

    Replies: @Yevardian

    Then the political community I am part of traces its founding back to 1066

    From some post I don’t remember, I thought you were Portuguese.

    • Replies: @Coconuts
    @Yevardian

    Ha, I did live there for a while when I was younger.

  480. @Yevardian
    @Coconuts


    Then the political community I am part of traces its founding back to 1066
     
    From some post I don't remember, I thought you were Portuguese.

    Replies: @Coconuts

    Ha, I did live there for a while when I was younger.

  481. AP says:
    @Ivashka the fool
    @AP

    I am as far as it gets from being a materialist. Quite the opposite to materialism, I believe that the Reality is actually made of active and structured information - Logos. There is no doubt that our Lord Jesus was the Logos, but so was Svyatovit or the Buddha or the neighbor next door and his dog. We all are the Logos at the deepest of our minds. It cannot be otherwise.

    Inside this Ocean of causal active information, the Gods of our ancestors were the Attractors around which the information that was historically specific to our people organized. Once erased, our people started being erased too. That is why Rusyns accepted the infamous name of Ukrainians (border-dwellers) instead of sticking with the name of their Ros/Rus forefathers (Rho being the root for Light in PIE).

    There is no more spiritual vitality left in the souls of the Slavs, they are attracted to any other strong Attractor that is found nearby. Yesterday it was Christianity, today it is the Jew-EU/Jew-US Globalism, tomorrow it would be Islam, which is the spiritual Black Hole of total submission to the Demiurge.

    Those who still hold to anything Aryan among us, or still have the blessings to have access to the remnants of their Old Faith, are the ones who truly represent what is left of what we were supposed to be. Those who are still not completely erased and reformed into the global Abrahamic spiritual play doh that the Demiurge can model into anything he wishes.

    Those are our people.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @AP

    I am as far as it gets from being a materialist. Quite the opposite to materialism, I believe that the Reality is actually made of active and structured information – Logos. There is no doubt that our Lord Jesus was the Logos, but so was Svyatovit or the Buddha or the neighbor next door and his dog. We all are the Logos at the deepest of our minds. It cannot be otherwise.

    If everyone is (equally) the Son of God than no one is. Which is a lot like the materialistic (or perhaps a better term would be secular, profane, positivist) belief that Jesus was just a Jewish teacher, not the Son of God – in which case, there is no special need to follow Him or His Church, we have our own teachers.

    That is why Rusyns accepted the infamous name of Ukrainians (border-dwellers) instead of sticking with the name of their Ros/Rus forefathers (Rho being the root for Light in PIE)

    Rus was the name that eastern Slavs adopted after their Rus conquerors and owners, led by a Norseman who came from a region of Sweden with that name. It represents their state of being under the rule of foreigners. The people we now call Russians maintained that tradition, it is appropriate that they kept such a name. Better a geographic name than that.

    There is no more spiritual vitality left in the souls of the Slavs

    You’ve been to churches in Slavic lands, be they in Poland, Ukraine, or even sometimes in Russia (the least devout of the three nations). What you write is mistaken.

    Those who still hold to anything Aryan among us, or still have the blessings to have access to the remnants of their Old Faith, are the ones who truly represent what is left of what we were supposed to be.

    Because Jesus was indeed the Son of God than what we were supposed to be would be Christians, with our own unique traditions. Your to criticism about the infusion of foreign Ukrainian influence on the Russian Church, a consequence of the unnatural annexation of Ukrainian lands by Moscow (which spiritually belong within the PLC), has validity to it. The solution would be to revive the still-not-dead Old Believer traditions in Russia (and adopt them for yourself) rather than seek to recreate long-dead Paganism or look for them among very distant cousins who left our homeland thousands of years ago.

    Yesterday it was Christianity, today it is the Jew-EU/Jew-US Globalism, tomorrow it would be Islam, which is the spiritual Black Hole of total submission to the Demiurge.

    Islam may be to Christianity, what the revived Hinduism was to Buddhism. It could have been a real danger (Buddhism was ultimately removed form India and Nepal) but I think that time has passed when Christendom surpassed Islamic world and left it in the dust in terms of culture, wealth and technology.

    Christianity continues to grow, globally:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Growth_of_religion#:~:text=According%20to%20various%20scholars%20and,%22Born%20again%22%20every%20day.

    Islam grows faster, but this is due to higher birth rate and not conversion (it is neutral in terms of conversion, while Christianity gains more converts than it loses). And birth rates are slowing down.
    Christianity gains many converts in Asia and Africa.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @AP


    If everyone is (equally) the Son of God than no one is. Which is a lot like the materialistic (or perhaps a better term would be secular, profane, positivist) belief that Jesus was just a Jewish teacher, not the Son of God – in which case, there is no special need to follow Him or His Church, we have our own teachers.
     
    One can be a Christian without acknowledging Jesus's divinity:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultural_Christians


    Because Jesus was indeed the Son of God than what we were supposed to be would be Christians, with our own unique traditions.
     
    So, you believe that had paternity testing actually existed 2,000 years ago, no man on Earth would have passed a paternity test to be Jesus's father?

    BTW, have you extensively studied the arguments that Jews have put forward as to why they believe that Jesus was not the Messiah?

    Also, as a side question: The accession to Heaven: Do you believe that Jesus simply quite literally rose up to the clouds? But Heaven isn't right above the clouds; we know this because we have travelled to space. So, where exactly is Heaven and where exactly did Jesus go? Is it in another dimension, or what?

    Replies: @Wokechoke

  482. @Greasy William
    @Anatoly Karlin

    I know that you know that Americans will never agree to fight against China. What are you getting out of pretending otherwise?

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    Taiwan?

    • Replies: @Greasy William
    @Mr. XYZ

    Once the US loses a carrier, the entire US public will advocate surrender

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

  483. AP says:
    @Ivashka the fool
    @Mr. Hack

    I taught them what I could of my imperfect understanding. They are free to apply it for themselves, if and as they see fit. They are the result of a complex mix of karmic influences. So they will have interesting lives, they already have started living interesting existences. They will learn a lot. We all come into this existence to learn and become better mind-streams.

    My children are no exception. I wish they had an ancestral Attractor to hold on to, it makes things easier, but I did my best that they have Dharma as a refuge instead. Dharma is the Universal Refuge and wide opened door to escape towards Enlightenment. That is how I taught my kids.

    Buddha is a valid source of knowledge. I hope they learn from the tradition of the Indo - Scythian princely ascetic, just like I did for so many years now and still do on a daily basis.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @AP

    Buddha is a valid source of knowledge. I hope they learn from the tradition of the Indo – Scythian princely ascetic,

    Incidentally, the book I had mentioned before:

    Claims that Scythians originated the idea of monotheism conceptualized as a main God in the sky (and condemned worship of lesser gods), and that the Jews learned this from them. That is, this is ultimately an Indo-European Attractor after all.

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @AP

    The oldest Indian texts extant today are the Gandharan birch bark scrolls, first among which were discovered in the Swat Valley (ancient Udyana). These were written in Kharosti script, which Kanishka the Great made into the official alphabet, used within his Indo-Scythian Empire, replacing the Aramaic and Greek scripts that were used for the official communications for centuries since the Persian and Macedonian conquests of Northern Hindustan.

    The texts are more or less fragmented Buddhist Sutras, most of them canonical, although with some alterations. However, some of the smaller fragments correspond to the less well known or even completely unknown Buddhist scriptures, one of these tells the story of Bodhisattvas descending from the Buddhist paradise (the Tushita Heaven) to help suffering creatures in the worlds bellow. What is peculiar about this fragment, is that it literally names these Bodhisattvas Sons of God. Which is not very Buddhist according to the modern understanding. These scrolls date back to the time of the redaction of the Gospels. One of the Silk Road branches passed through that region. Aramaic and Greek were the lingua franca of the time along the Silk Road, the Gandharans were very much Hellenistic. Buddhist artifacts have been found in Egypt where Jesus spent his younger years, most probably in Alexandria, where nearly half the population were Hellenistic Jews.

    Another thing, in Mahayana Buddhist thought, the nature of the Enlightened sentient beings (Buddhas) is made of a kind of Trinity, which is literally called the Triple Body - the Trikaya. First among these is the Absolute, Universal Body of the Dharma - completely identical with the ground of being (Dharmakaya). The second is the Body of Bliss/Holy Rapture - pure joy and freedom energy (Samboghakaya). The third is the Body of Manifestation - physical body which appears in our troubled world to perform good deeds and save the beings that roam its infinite worlds without a hope of escape (Nirmanakaya).

    The last thing about Buddhism fir today, a Buddha is supposedly capable of creating Buddha Lands, pure kingdoms not of this world, to which he can guide the sentient beings that have faith in the salvation through Buddha's help. And a well advanced Bodhisattva is able to transfer his acquired merit to help alleviate the sins of the sentient beings. It is a very old doctrine, also present in Jainism.

    Finally, I have read somewhere, that the Orthodox missionaries among the pagan Slavs have written that they had a concept of the universal Godhood manifesting as various beings, but ultimately having the nature of the Pure White Light. Hence the expression Белый Свет, still used in Russian to this very day ro describe the manifested Universe.

    Given that you previously enjoyed the postpunk music that I have shared with you and commented about us having somewhat similar musical tastes, allow me to link a song that is directly related to my comment.

    The frontman of the NMA, Justin Sullivan is a Gnostic mystic and a shaman on top of being a fine poet and a radical ecologist. A fine example of Celtic spirit.

    https://youtu.be/WeRNMvPxJz0

    The song recounts one of his mystical experiences.

    White Light...

    Do you really think that this Pure White Light is not universal, but had to be specifically embodied in a young Galilean Rabbi (who according to what is written above in my comment might have been a Great Bodhisattva) ?

    What if your own purified mind was exactly this very same Pure White Light ?

    Would it be worthwhile to get a look into it ?

    Rhetorical questions.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luminous_mind

    Replies: @AP

  484. @AP
    @Ivashka the fool


    I am as far as it gets from being a materialist. Quite the opposite to materialism, I believe that the Reality is actually made of active and structured information – Logos. There is no doubt that our Lord Jesus was the Logos, but so was Svyatovit or the Buddha or the neighbor next door and his dog. We all are the Logos at the deepest of our minds. It cannot be otherwise.
     
    If everyone is (equally) the Son of God than no one is. Which is a lot like the materialistic (or perhaps a better term would be secular, profane, positivist) belief that Jesus was just a Jewish teacher, not the Son of God - in which case, there is no special need to follow Him or His Church, we have our own teachers.

    That is why Rusyns accepted the infamous name of Ukrainians (border-dwellers) instead of sticking with the name of their Ros/Rus forefathers (Rho being the root for Light in PIE)
     
    Rus was the name that eastern Slavs adopted after their Rus conquerors and owners, led by a Norseman who came from a region of Sweden with that name. It represents their state of being under the rule of foreigners. The people we now call Russians maintained that tradition, it is appropriate that they kept such a name. Better a geographic name than that.

    There is no more spiritual vitality left in the souls of the Slavs
     
    You've been to churches in Slavic lands, be they in Poland, Ukraine, or even sometimes in Russia (the least devout of the three nations). What you write is mistaken.

    Those who still hold to anything Aryan among us, or still have the blessings to have access to the remnants of their Old Faith, are the ones who truly represent what is left of what we were supposed to be.
     
    Because Jesus was indeed the Son of God than what we were supposed to be would be Christians, with our own unique traditions. Your to criticism about the infusion of foreign Ukrainian influence on the Russian Church, a consequence of the unnatural annexation of Ukrainian lands by Moscow (which spiritually belong within the PLC), has validity to it. The solution would be to revive the still-not-dead Old Believer traditions in Russia (and adopt them for yourself) rather than seek to recreate long-dead Paganism or look for them among very distant cousins who left our homeland thousands of years ago.

    Yesterday it was Christianity, today it is the Jew-EU/Jew-US Globalism, tomorrow it would be Islam, which is the spiritual Black Hole of total submission to the Demiurge.
     
    Islam may be to Christianity, what the revived Hinduism was to Buddhism. It could have been a real danger (Buddhism was ultimately removed form India and Nepal) but I think that time has passed when Christendom surpassed Islamic world and left it in the dust in terms of culture, wealth and technology.

    Christianity continues to grow, globally:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Growth_of_religion#:~:text=According%20to%20various%20scholars%20and,%22Born%20again%22%20every%20day.

    Islam grows faster, but this is due to higher birth rate and not conversion (it is neutral in terms of conversion, while Christianity gains more converts than it loses). And birth rates are slowing down.
    Christianity gains many converts in Asia and Africa.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    If everyone is (equally) the Son of God than no one is. Which is a lot like the materialistic (or perhaps a better term would be secular, profane, positivist) belief that Jesus was just a Jewish teacher, not the Son of God – in which case, there is no special need to follow Him or His Church, we have our own teachers.

    One can be a Christian without acknowledging Jesus’s divinity:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultural_Christians

    Because Jesus was indeed the Son of God than what we were supposed to be would be Christians, with our own unique traditions.

    So, you believe that had paternity testing actually existed 2,000 years ago, no man on Earth would have passed a paternity test to be Jesus’s father?

    BTW, have you extensively studied the arguments that Jews have put forward as to why they believe that Jesus was not the Messiah?

    Also, as a side question: The accession to Heaven: Do you believe that Jesus simply quite literally rose up to the clouds? But Heaven isn’t right above the clouds; we know this because we have travelled to space. So, where exactly is Heaven and where exactly did Jesus go? Is it in another dimension, or what?

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @Mr. XYZ

    He didn’t exist. And indeed in that sense his story is all the more miraculous and authentically religious. Absolute Virgin Birth. Absolutely. Also raised from the dead on the third day and he cast out the devil from possessed Jews. Which was all all of them.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

  485. @Yahya
    @Wokechoke

    Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth.

    - Matthew 5:5


    https://i.ibb.co/37bqL5K/5830-A2-D4-C6-BB-4607-9555-54-F2909-A09-BC.png

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @silviosilver

    The decisive battle of the 21st century will be Sub-Saharan Africa vs. Gnon lol.

  486. @AP
    @Mikhail


    Tatars were never a majority in Crimea from the 1897 census to the present
     
    But they outnumbered Russians in 1897 and Russians themselves did not become a majority until World War II.

    To simply say that the Tatars are a mix of different people in Crimea including those predating the Rus Slav presence

     

    That’s not an implication but a statement of fact. In Crimea, the Tatars absorbed the Greeks, Ostrogoths and others who had previously been living there.

    Also the medieval Rus presence in Crimea was only in a small corner near the Kerch strait. Perhaps 1% of Crimea’s territory. Most of that principality was in what is now the Russian side of the strait.

    So your argument manages to be stupid on two levels: Crimean Tatars are descended from the pre-Tatar invasion inhabitants; and, the medieval Rus didn’t rule 99% of Crimean territory.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @Mikhail

    But they outnumbered Russians in 1897 and Russians themselves did not become a majority until World War II

    By a whopping 2% margin of roughly 35% to 33%. Your other idiotic comments are Soros new history like. The Tatars didn’t predate the Rus Slav presence. In more present times, the Tatars are a clear minority in Crimea. The Tatars “absorbed” as in not having been there first.

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @Mikhail

    Isn’t Kazan the capital of Tartary? It’s tucked right behind Moscow.

    , @AP
    @Mikhail


    But they outnumbered Russians in 1897 and Russians themselves did not become a majority until World War II

    By a whopping 2% margin of roughly 35% to 33%.
     
    Yes, as I said they outnumbered Russians. And also as I said, Russians weren't a majority until World War II. Everything I said was accurate. Unlike what you said.

    Your other idiotic comments are Soros new history like
     
    Which ones and how?

    I pointed out that Rus only ever had about 1% of Crimea.

    See, that tiny piece:

    https://alchetron.com/cdn/tmutarakan-063f00d5-9d30-40e6-9eef-1afbb49cd57-resize-750.jpeg

    https://alchetron.com/cdn/tmutarakan-d9b18bf1-df1e-497d-960c-0d104d54465-resize-750.png

    The Tatars didn’t predate the Rus Slav presence
     
    The presence that only ever existed on 1% of Crimean territory (see above).

    And although the Tatar came later, the ancestors of the Crimean Tatars (Greeks, Ostrogoths, etc.) were there much earlier.

    https://catedra-unesco.espais.iec.cat/en/2017/03/20/20-the-crimean-tatars-who-they-are-and-where-they-come-from/

    The merging of the Mongols and the Turkic population in the north of the peninsula and of the same Turkic population and the Greeks and Byzantines from the south coast configured the Tatar people of Crimea, who were the main group in the peninsula until the beginning of the twentieth century, long after the Russian annexation of 1783.

    Clearly, the Crimean Tatars are heavily mixed with native non-Asians:

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/34/H%C4%B1d%C4%B1rellez_in_Crimea_11.jpg

    ::::::::::::::::

    So, as I said: "your argument manages to be stupid on two levels: Crimean Tatars are descended from the pre-Tatar invasion inhabitants; and, the medieval Rus didn’t rule 99% of Crimean territory."

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @Mikhail

  487. This should be good:

  488. @Mr. XYZ
    @Greasy William

    Taiwan?

    Replies: @Greasy William

    Once the US loses a carrier, the entire US public will advocate surrender

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @Greasy William

    One carrier loss I don't think would be enough to end the US war effort:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_aircraft_carriers_of_the_United_States_Navy

    Replies: @Greasy William

  489. @A123
    @QCIC

    Keep your mind on a swivel.

    • Share your source and evidence that “100% of all Proud Boys members are Feds”.
    • Or retract and apologize.

    There is no shame in a retraction if your mistake was accidental. However, it came across as intentional misrepresentation for the purposes of strawmanning. A broad sweep at everyone.

    If you want to say, the FBI managed to penetrate The Proud Boys with multiple informants ... You could try that. How many informants? -&- How many members? Would be the obvious next questions.

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @QCIC

    No thanks. You can sort this out on your own. Not all of my sources are accepted at TUR.

    Your interpretation of my wording (“100%”) makes it into a straw man which is different than a reasonable reading of the meaning of my comments. You might be correct with that change, but I was not going as far as you did.

    On a possibly related point, I think a very suggestive case has been made that the Ashli Babbit shooting was faked. Does this notion also let the bats loose in your belfry?

    Your parroting of some of my words reminds me again of Mr. Hack. Is that you?

    • LOL: A123
    • Replies: @A123
    @QCIC

    ROTFLMAO

    Why did you parrot my use of the term *strawman "? That says much about you. Are you as mentally ill as Mr. hack?
    ____

    Your intentional misrepresentation was for the purposes of strawmanning. A broad sweep at everyone. Keep your mind on a swivel.

    • Share your source that “100% of all Proud Boys members are Feds”.
    • Or retract and apologize.

    There is no shame in a retraction if your mistake was accidental.

    Trying to accuse me of your own anti-Semitic transgressions is both laughable and very Pallywood.

    PEACE 😇

     
    https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-_urdfNnOw5M/TfRxQACTRJI/AAAAAAAAAFc/LuPlWjXvxP0/s1600/1307865286832.jpg

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

  490. @Mikhail
    @AP


    But they outnumbered Russians in 1897 and Russians themselves did not become a majority until World War II
     
    By a whopping 2% margin of roughly 35% to 33%. Your other idiotic comments are Soros new history like. The Tatars didn't predate the Rus Slav presence. In more present times, the Tatars are a clear minority in Crimea. The Tatars "absorbed" as in not having been there first.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @AP

    Isn’t Kazan the capital of Tartary? It’s tucked right behind Moscow.

  491. @AP
    @Ivashka the fool


    Buddha is a valid source of knowledge. I hope they learn from the tradition of the Indo – Scythian princely ascetic,
     
    Incidentally, the book I had mentioned before:

    https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/519zZ2whXgL._SX427_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg

    Claims that Scythians originated the idea of monotheism conceptualized as a main God in the sky (and condemned worship of lesser gods), and that the Jews learned this from them. That is, this is ultimately an Indo-European Attractor after all.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

    The oldest Indian texts extant today are the Gandharan birch bark scrolls, first among which were discovered in the Swat Valley (ancient Udyana). These were written in Kharosti script, which Kanishka the Great made into the official alphabet, used within his Indo-Scythian Empire, replacing the Aramaic and Greek scripts that were used for the official communications for centuries since the Persian and Macedonian conquests of Northern Hindustan.

    The texts are more or less fragmented Buddhist Sutras, most of them canonical, although with some alterations. However, some of the smaller fragments correspond to the less well known or even completely unknown Buddhist scriptures, one of these tells the story of Bodhisattvas descending from the Buddhist paradise (the Tushita Heaven) to help suffering creatures in the worlds bellow. What is peculiar about this fragment, is that it literally names these Bodhisattvas Sons of God. Which is not very Buddhist according to the modern understanding. These scrolls date back to the time of the redaction of the Gospels. One of the Silk Road branches passed through that region. Aramaic and Greek were the lingua franca of the time along the Silk Road, the Gandharans were very much Hellenistic. Buddhist artifacts have been found in Egypt where Jesus spent his younger years, most probably in Alexandria, where nearly half the population were Hellenistic Jews.

    Another thing, in Mahayana Buddhist thought, the nature of the Enlightened sentient beings (Buddhas) is made of a kind of Trinity, which is literally called the Triple Body – the Trikaya. First among these is the Absolute, Universal Body of the Dharma – completely identical with the ground of being (Dharmakaya). The second is the Body of Bliss/Holy Rapture – pure joy and freedom energy (Samboghakaya). The third is the Body of Manifestation – physical body which appears in our troubled world to perform good deeds and save the beings that roam its infinite worlds without a hope of escape (Nirmanakaya).

    The last thing about Buddhism fir today, a Buddha is supposedly capable of creating Buddha Lands, pure kingdoms not of this world, to which he can guide the sentient beings that have faith in the salvation through Buddha’s help. And a well advanced Bodhisattva is able to transfer his acquired merit to help alleviate the sins of the sentient beings. It is a very old doctrine, also present in Jainism.

    Finally, I have read somewhere, that the Orthodox missionaries among the pagan Slavs have written that they had a concept of the universal Godhood manifesting as various beings, but ultimately having the nature of the Pure White Light. Hence the expression Белый Свет, still used in Russian to this very day ro describe the manifested Universe.

    [MORE]

    Given that you previously enjoyed the postpunk music that I have shared with you and commented about us having somewhat similar musical tastes, allow me to link a song that is directly related to my comment.

    The frontman of the NMA, Justin Sullivan is a Gnostic mystic and a shaman on top of being a fine poet and a radical ecologist. A fine example of Celtic spirit.

    The song recounts one of his mystical experiences.

    White Light…

    Do you really think that this Pure White Light is not universal, but had to be specifically embodied in a young Galilean Rabbi (who according to what is written above in my comment might have been a Great Bodhisattva) ?

    What if your own purified mind was exactly this very same Pure White Light ?

    Would it be worthwhile to get a look into it ?

    Rhetorical questions.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luminous_mind

    • Thanks: AP
    • Replies: @AP
    @Ivashka the fool


    some of the smaller fragments correspond to the less well known or even completely unknown Buddhist scriptures, one of these tells the story of Bodhisattvas descending from the Buddhist paradise (the Tushita Heaven) to help suffering creatures in the worlds bellow. What is peculiar about this fragment, is that it literally names these Bodhisattvas Sons of God. Which is not very Buddhist according to the modern understanding.....Do you really think that this Pure White Light is not universal, but had to be specifically embodied in a young Galilean Rabbi (who according to what is written above in my comment might have been a Great Bodhisattva) ?
     
    In that case, would that not make Christianity much more than what you dismissingly refer to as Abrahamic faiths, like Islam or Judaism? And perhaps, even closer to older more original form of Buddhism, that has been lost?

    An interesting cycle. The knowledge of one God, dwelling in the sky, originated among the Aryans (Scythians), and was given form the Aryans to the Jews. And then God incarnated among the Jews, was rejected by most of them, but His faith was eventually adopted by the Aryans (or, their Slavic brothers).


    Given that you previously enjoyed the postpunk music that I have shared with you and commented about us having somewhat similar musical tastes, allow me to link a song that is directly related to my comment.
     
    Thank you, it was very nice.
  492. @Mr. XYZ
    @AP


    If everyone is (equally) the Son of God than no one is. Which is a lot like the materialistic (or perhaps a better term would be secular, profane, positivist) belief that Jesus was just a Jewish teacher, not the Son of God – in which case, there is no special need to follow Him or His Church, we have our own teachers.
     
    One can be a Christian without acknowledging Jesus's divinity:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultural_Christians


    Because Jesus was indeed the Son of God than what we were supposed to be would be Christians, with our own unique traditions.
     
    So, you believe that had paternity testing actually existed 2,000 years ago, no man on Earth would have passed a paternity test to be Jesus's father?

    BTW, have you extensively studied the arguments that Jews have put forward as to why they believe that Jesus was not the Messiah?

    Also, as a side question: The accession to Heaven: Do you believe that Jesus simply quite literally rose up to the clouds? But Heaven isn't right above the clouds; we know this because we have travelled to space. So, where exactly is Heaven and where exactly did Jesus go? Is it in another dimension, or what?

    Replies: @Wokechoke

    He didn’t exist. And indeed in that sense his story is all the more miraculous and authentically religious. Absolute Virgin Birth. Absolutely. Also raised from the dead on the third day and he cast out the devil from possessed Jews. Which was all all of them.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @Wokechoke

    Virgin birth is theoretically possible through artificial insemination. It could have existed in a primitive form even 2,000 years ago, with fapping in one's hand and then placing one's sperm-filled hand inside of a vagina lol. But this probably isn't the kind of virgin birth that Christians envision.

    Jesus was mentioned as a historical figure by non-Christian sources as well, so he likely existed. Though I'm still trying to figure out how belief in his alleged Resurrection became so widespread. I mean, the Accession story just strikes me as being so extraordinarily unbelievable (and again, where it Heaven? It's not right above the clouds, so where did Jesus go?), which makes me wonder if the Resurrection story was false as well. Maybe a lot of early Christians simply had visions of Jesus? Similar to how some people have visions of the Virgin Mary? If one can see things that aren't there as a result of one hallucinating, one might be capable of feeling things that aren't there either.

    And even in the modern era, we sometimes have alleged miracles being witnessed by huge numbers of people:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ganesha_drinking_milk_miracle

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miracle_of_the_Sun

    And sometimes people just flat-out behave bizarrely with no rational explanation:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dancing_plague_of_1518

    Replies: @Wokechoke

  493. @Mr. XYZ
    @Anatoly Karlin

    Out of curiosity: Do you believe that Russia was wrong to force unwilling young men to risk their lives in World War I? Should it have exclusively relied on volunteers for its war effort?

    Basically, Russia's WWI war effort faltered because Russian normies stopped understanding what they were being sacrificed for. Do you really think that Constantinople and Galicia (both places where it's highly uncertain that Imperial Russia would have won a free and fair plebiscite anyway) were actually worth millions of young Russian lives? If so, then shouldn't Russia have been capable of finding enough volunteers for the task of conquering these territories as opposed to having it rely on conscription for this purpose?

    BTW, had Russia stopped its WWI war effort before the Bolsheviks would have seized power, the Bolshevik coup would have likely been avoided, as would the subsequent Bolshevik tyranny and WWII (due to Germany possibly winning WWI, and also due to no scary Bolshevik bogeyman in the East for the Nazis to utilize in order for them to gain power in Germany in the first place).

    Replies: @Anatoly Karlin, @Wokechoke

    Nah, the Russians went easy on Jews for too long. Imperialism in Russia was open to all, except Jews. The Bolsheviks ended that. Handed Jews power.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @Wokechoke

    Jewish Bolshevism was mainly a thing in the 1920s and 1930s. Stalin's purges weakened Jewish influence in the USSR, as did the Holocaust. There was a bit of a Jewish Bolshevism revival, especially in Eastern Europe, after WWII, but it didn't last for too long after Stalin's death. I don't know that many late Communist-era politicians were Jewish, even in part.

  494. @Wokechoke
    @Mr. XYZ

    He didn’t exist. And indeed in that sense his story is all the more miraculous and authentically religious. Absolute Virgin Birth. Absolutely. Also raised from the dead on the third day and he cast out the devil from possessed Jews. Which was all all of them.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    Virgin birth is theoretically possible through artificial insemination. It could have existed in a primitive form even 2,000 years ago, with fapping in one’s hand and then placing one’s sperm-filled hand inside of a vagina lol. But this probably isn’t the kind of virgin birth that Christians envision.

    Jesus was mentioned as a historical figure by non-Christian sources as well, so he likely existed. Though I’m still trying to figure out how belief in his alleged Resurrection became so widespread. I mean, the Accession story just strikes me as being so extraordinarily unbelievable (and again, where it Heaven? It’s not right above the clouds, so where did Jesus go?), which makes me wonder if the Resurrection story was false as well. Maybe a lot of early Christians simply had visions of Jesus? Similar to how some people have visions of the Virgin Mary? If one can see things that aren’t there as a result of one hallucinating, one might be capable of feeling things that aren’t there either.

    And even in the modern era, we sometimes have alleged miracles being witnessed by huge numbers of people:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ganesha_drinking_milk_miracle

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miracle_of_the_Sun

    And sometimes people just flat-out behave bizarrely with no rational explanation:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dancing_plague_of_1518

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @Mr. XYZ

    The entire point is that his existence is supernatural. It does not need to be rationalized. That's the freedom in it. A story designed by a Greek observer looking at the weirdo Jews.

  495. @Wokechoke
    @Mr. XYZ

    Nah, the Russians went easy on Jews for too long. Imperialism in Russia was open to all, except Jews. The Bolsheviks ended that. Handed Jews power.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    Jewish Bolshevism was mainly a thing in the 1920s and 1930s. Stalin’s purges weakened Jewish influence in the USSR, as did the Holocaust. There was a bit of a Jewish Bolshevism revival, especially in Eastern Europe, after WWII, but it didn’t last for too long after Stalin’s death. I don’t know that many late Communist-era politicians were Jewish, even in part.

  496. @Greasy William
    @Mr. XYZ

    Once the US loses a carrier, the entire US public will advocate surrender

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    One carrier loss I don’t think would be enough to end the US war effort:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_aircraft_carriers_of_the_United_States_Navy

    • Replies: @Greasy William
    @Mr. XYZ

    The US public will demand surrender once a carrier is suck

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

  497. @Yahya
    @Wokechoke

    Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth.

    - Matthew 5:5


    https://i.ibb.co/37bqL5K/5830-A2-D4-C6-BB-4607-9555-54-F2909-A09-BC.png

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @silviosilver

    Well, whites are the meekest race, so maybe there’s hope yet.

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @silviosilver

    The son of the wolf https://g.co/kgs/wzXgwd

    The White Man's Burden https://g.co/kgs/NJs2zD

    Men Without Women https://g.co/kgs/br7L9e

    Storm of Steel https://g.co/kgs/7scBeV


    I could go on...

    Meekest race, really ?

    Replies: @silviosilver

    , @Yahya
    @silviosilver


    Well, whites are the meekest race, so maybe there’s hope yet.
     
    John Derbyshire put it best when he said “white people are pussies”.

    This short and elegant sentence explains much of what has been happening recently in the West.

    This behavior seems to be cultural; whites used to be as ruthless as one can be just a few centuries ago.

    But the long prosperity has softened them.

    The Christian morality of “love thy neighbor” and “turn thy cheek” didn't help one bit either.

    Replies: @Greasy William, @Ivashka the fool, @Yevardian, @silviosilver

    , @Mr. XYZ
    @silviosilver

    Whites are also the hottest race lol. Even in comparison to East Asians. Especially white women. For men, it's less clear-cut lol.

    Replies: @QCIC, @silviosilver

  498. @Mr. XYZ
    @Greasy William

    One carrier loss I don't think would be enough to end the US war effort:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_aircraft_carriers_of_the_United_States_Navy

    Replies: @Greasy William

    The US public will demand surrender once a carrier is suck

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @Greasy William

    I don't know. Some Russia-appeasers in the US are China hawks, after all.

  499. @Wokechoke
    @Sean

    The defense around Tokmak was down to civil engineering. I’d assume that Shoigu and Surovikin will claim that they did it.

    Replies: @Sean

    That’s not true those tank graveyard losses came while they were still approaching the obstacles and main minefields. What happened I think is Russian electronic warfare, which is at long last doing its job, veiled Russian dispositions from drone and even satellite surveillance , so the Ukrainians had to do an actual reconnaissance in force.

    Russia’s top general, Valery Gerasimov, is someone rank of rank (incompetence). Or, he is more interested in keeping his job than doing it well. Shoigu is just a cautious bureaucrat who rose because he knew Putin prizes loyalty above all else.

    Because of Putin’s reluctance to admit that a SMO will not do it (so he miscalculated initially), and his minions being chosen for thei lack of moral courage, Russia is bumbling along without any determined effort to mobilise its resources to achieve a victory in the foreseeable future. meanwhile the Western countries arsenals are rock bottom so are going to have to start up production lines for all weapons anyway, just to replenish their own reserve stocks. Once that happens supplying Ukraine can be done without running down the West’s stocks, and so Ukraine will have quite possibly have access for the first time to a ceaseless flow of arms.

    Yet Russia, which still has a firepower advantage, has not even declared war on Ukraine. The Kremlin is acting like it has all the time in the world.

  500. S says:
    @Wokechoke
    @Mr. XYZ

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=WeVWupFBkA8

    Why Italy is Great…

    Replies: @Yahya, @S

    Why Italy is Great…

    It’s kind of interesting that both the circa 1970 war comedies Catch 22 and Kelly’s Heros each critiqued some darker aspects of the US armed forces involvement in WWII, ie looting, black marketeering, soldier rape/murders of local women.

    [If it hadn’t been for the tolerance of the freewheeling criticisms about the then current US involvement in Vietnam, and that these were comedies, I doubt such things about WWII would of ever been aired in such a public manner.]

    ‘The penalty for looting is death!

    M & M Enterprises

    [MORE]

    ‘You killed her?’

  501. @silviosilver
    @Yahya

    Well, whites are the meekest race, so maybe there's hope yet.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Yahya, @Mr. XYZ

    The son of the wolf https://g.co/kgs/wzXgwd

    The White Man’s Burden https://g.co/kgs/NJs2zD

    Men Without Women https://g.co/kgs/br7L9e

    Storm of Steel https://g.co/kgs/7scBeV

    I could go on…

    Meekest race, really ?

    • Agree: S
    • Replies: @silviosilver
    @Ivashka the fool


    Meekest race, really ?
     
    Whites are meekest today. The meek inheriting the earth would apply to those people who are meek at the point in time the earth is to be inherited, rather than to those who've been meekest historically, wouldn't it? Or maybe it applies to anyone who was ever meek. Who knows? Jesus wasn't one to clearly explain what he meant; or if he ever did, no one considered his explanations worth writing down.
  502. A123 says: • Website
    @QCIC
    @A123

    No thanks. You can sort this out on your own. Not all of my sources are accepted at TUR.

    Your interpretation of my wording ("100%") makes it into a straw man which is different than a reasonable reading of the meaning of my comments. You might be correct with that change, but I was not going as far as you did.

    On a possibly related point, I think a very suggestive case has been made that the Ashli Babbit shooting was faked. Does this notion also let the bats loose in your belfry?

    Your parroting of some of my words reminds me again of Mr. Hack. Is that you?

    Replies: @A123

    ROTFLMAO

    Why did you parrot my use of the term *strawman “? That says much about you. Are you as mentally ill as Mr. hack?
    ____

    Your intentional misrepresentation was for the purposes of strawmanning. A broad sweep at everyone. Keep your mind on a swivel.

    • Share your source that “100% of all Proud Boys members are Feds”.
    • Or retract and apologize.

    There is no shame in a retraction if your mistake was accidental.

    Trying to accuse me of your own anti-Semitic transgressions is both laughable and very Pallywood.

    PEACE 😇

     

    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @A123

    There he goes again, playing a home schooled psychiatrist. kremlinstoogeA123 claims that he's put me on "ignore" (does anybody really believe that he has, meaning that he's a pathological liar?) over a year ago, and yet he still can't get me out of his mind.

    https://m.media-amazon.com/images/P/1095482971.01._SCLZZZZZZZ_SX500_.jpg
    Poor kreminstoogeA123, just can't quit thinking about me. :-(

  503. Having followed Prigozhin’s Special Military Operation online last Saturday, as well as read plenty of commentary from multiple sources, my theory of what really happened is the following:

    Prigozhin is much smarter than the Sovok boomers at the helm of the Russian military/security apparatus, as revealed by the fact that he understands the internet and was actually in charge of some cyber troll enterprise. It is therefore no surprise that the PMC that he organized was able to perform much better than the regular Russian forces. Having seen first hand the incompetence of the Russian military and how it translates to massive loss of life at the front, he got fed up and started a feud with the top brass that eventually led him to rebel against them, being on the verge of entering Moscow with his troops. At the last moment, either he found less support in certain ranks than he had expected or he was genuinely convinced that he shouldn’t carry on with an action that was going to cause many deaths and damage to Russia.

    IOW, things often really are what they look like. Most of the time, actually, as every adult should be able to conclude by just observing life around them. But for some reason many people have trouble translating their real life experience to broader realms. Hence all the disparate and wild fantasies one has to go through when reading commentary on any big event in the news. Prediction: Unz will soon start posting threads of many thousands of words trying to prove that none of the above is what really happened and possibly launching an ever wilder theory than anything we’ve read so far.

    • Replies: @Greasy William
    @Mikel

    I think that's mostly right. Wagner was going to be dissolved so Prig launched a quasi coup against Shoigu. The purpose of the not coup was not to push out Shoigu, but to allow Wagner to keep its independence.

    But then Putin went on TV and declared Prigozhin to a be a traitor so Prigozhin either needed to make a deal or face certain death. Sensing opportunity, Lukashenko offered Pirgozhin the ability to keep Wagner as an independent force in Belarus. Putin, cautious by nature and not wanting to risk internal bloodshed, agreed to the deal with the intention of going back on it as soon as possible. Already the FSB is talking about prosecuting Prigozhin.

    Russia is Magog, but I no longer think that Putin is Gog. Now I just think he's an idiot. This not coup has brought closer a nationalist takeover of the RF and that guy will be Gog.

    Replies: @Mikel, @S

    , @Sean
    @Mikel

    Scott Adams's explanation for the Russian army's performance is that in 2021 Putin asked Chief of the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces and First Deputy Minister of Defence Gerasimov how long it would take to subdue Ukraine in an attack from a standing start (ie with the forces currently in the build up around Ukraine) and Gerasimov--thinking that it was just a hypothetical ego trip conversation-- replied 'a week or so'. Whereupon, Putin told the hapless army commander 'Right do it then'. The Russian General Staff would surely have amassed a far larger and more balanced force had they understood the build up was not for military's pressure on the border but an an actual invasion with the Promethean task of conquering Europe's largest country defended by a determined army with combat experience, home advantage, and US intel and arms assistance.

    I think the majority of the Russian army privately blame Gerasimov for not quickly insisting after the initial disappointing results that a Special Military Operation level of force was inadequate and there needed to be a much more intense effort to mobilise Russia and field a war-winning army. Russia is still officially engaged in a mere SNO rather than a war! Prigozhin is an ex con who made his real money in casinos (some muscle would be required to get into that business back in the day) and so by neither temperament or career training is he that good soldier obeying any order no matter how stupid; he has got where he is by being willing to use violence insofar it suited his purpose. I think Prigozhin was trying to get through to Putin that the conflict with Ukraine is something Russia needs to get a grip and take hard decisions about: either fight to force a decision in the foreseeable future or dial down the effort to advance and effectively start to look for a way of ending the hostilities.


    But for some reason many people have trouble translating their real life experience to broader realms. Hence all the disparate and wild fantasies one has to go through when reading commentary on any big event in the news.
     
    Yes. Still it can be entertaining to read and come up with those kids of things oneself. Like working a speed bag for a boxer, which looks stupid but is training him to keep his hands up (the most important thing in boxing), speculating about events as if they are part of a grand design to manipulate and control the public is good preparation for more serious thinking. Gets the blood pumping round the brain. And even if rarely true when well done even wildest speculation can be appreciated as a work of art.

    "Oakeshott loved Shakespeare. In all the odd and quirky characters–from Falstaff to Bushy, from Benedik to Hamlet and Macbeth–he saw what a free society could create, not in terms of projects or goals or abstractions, but in terms of the human beings that are allowed to flourish with all their idiosyncrasies and faults and character traits. This was for Oakeshott a wonder to behold. Every person he met was a character, or at least a potential character. And he saw the point of liberal democracy as giving individuals the ability to more fully become themselves, to ripen and mature in all their idiosyncrasies and differences. All of life, Oakeshott argues, is an adventure. Let’s see what I can become. Let’s see what I can make of my life. Let’s greet life and its difficulties and exigencies and unpredictable nature as an opportunity."

    , @Yevardian
    @Mikel


    Having seen first hand the incompetence of the Russian military and how it translates to massive loss of life at the front, he got fed up and started a feud with the top brass that eventually led him to rebel against them, being on the verge of entering Moscow with his troops. At the last moment, either he found less support in certain ranks than he had expected or he was genuinely convinced that he shouldn’t carry on with an action that was going to cause many deaths and damage to Russia.
     
    I agree with general gist of your whole post, except I think this interpretation somewhat discounts the fact that Prigozhin and Shoigu have hated each other for many years now, and it's anyone's guess how and when their feud started.
    As far as I recall (Ivashka/Bashibuzuk can fill in missing details or mistakes) Shoigu's real career began with Yeltsin's shelling of the White House in 1993 (the real deathdate of Russian democray, as anyone knows, and the event that convinced my family to decide on emigration, after the sabotage of Ter-Petrosyan) and the subsequent repression of any protests. Shoigu's subsequent history shouldn't inspire anyone he was promoted for military competence.

    Prigozhin's claims of a deliberate missile attack on Wagner from the MOD seem to be a justifying exaggeration, but there's no doubt that Shoigu and others in the army were actively trying to marginalise Wagner's role, eventually escalating to small-scale sabotage, with the eventual goal of having Prigozhin removed from his position for months.

    Putin seems so AWOL from the day-to-day military developments of the SMO that I think the inter-service rivalry finally got completely out of hand, and Prigozhin impetuously tried this desperate mutinous action with hopes of retaining his position (and by extension, likely his life), or at least obtaining for himself some sort of exit.
    Certainly I don't think a march all the way to Moscow was planned beforehand, but with the slowness of any official decisive reaction, events took their own course.

    Replies: @Dmitry, @Mikel

    , @AP
    @Mikel


    At the last moment, either he found less support in certain ranks than he had expected or he was genuinely convinced that he shouldn’t carry on with an action that was going to cause many deaths and damage to Russia.
     
    Apparently he, or if not he than many of his people, didn't secure their family members, who were getting detained by the FSB as he marched on Moscow. These hostages may have contributed to his decision to stop the march.

    Replies: @Sean

  504. @Mr. Hack
    @QCIC


    I realize that starting a nuclear WW3 with Russia will be very bad.
     
    A patriotic, real American would think that Russia starting a nuclear with the West and with America will be a very bad thing. You've got your focus all mixed-up. Appeasers usually do. :-(

    https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/577586e937c581b49591b5c7/a2b71a94-90bd-4f3e-8245-3fa74fd55fda/012B2A09-36D7-42F0-9087-B58BA2EA3F16.jpeg
    The old Hitler was wrong then, as the new Putler is wrong today. History has taught us that appeasing any Hitler is the wrong thing to do, whenever he appears of the world stage.

    Replies: @John Johnson, @QCIC, @Gerard1234

    Again, with the cretinous cartoons Hack

    The old Hitler was wrong then, as the new Putler is wrong today.

    Dumbass – literally the only thing scum as Hitler was not completely wrong on you are trying to criticise. The whole western world (effectively) supported Hitler taking Poland you dimwit. Actions by western states after September 1939 and then from after the Yalta conference confirm Poland got what it deserved.

    He was an evil level of wrong to mass murder Jews in Poland, but the treatment of Polish nationalists and their worthless cretin fascist-dictatorship state was perfectly socially acceptable behaviour because the Poles were just as bad. Polish imperialism was far more in area and worse than Nazi imperialism at the time.

    The only similarity now is that, strictly on Polish-German relations ONLY, the Nazi demands to Poland were perfectly reasonable ……..and of course Russian demands to fuckheadistan puppet state now were perfectly reasonable.

    Comparisons are completely lazy. Despite the BS propaganda fed to a muppet like you Hack, clearly outside of our own land of Ukraine, we have zero intention to take shithole Poland/Baltics or Czechia, Bulgaria etc.

    Hitler presumably didn’t take 6 million Polish refugees in, or 4 million in the preceeding 8 years. Presumably Polands last 2 Presidents then were not in the top 1% of taxpayers into Nazi germany state finances of the preceeding 30 years

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @Gerard1234


    the Nazi demands to Poland were perfectly reasonable
     
    I think that the more important point here is that short of Germany being routed on the battlefield (which actually did eventually occur in real life, at an extraordinarily high cost), Germany was probably unlikely to offer Poland better peace terms even under a post-Nazi German regime (in the event of a successful anti-Nazi coup in Germany). After all, even Weimar Germany deeply resented the Danzig/Polish Corridor situation and did not view it as permanently binding on it.

    Maybe without the benefit of hindsight, the Poles felt that it was best for the Anglo-French to suffer a lot on their behalf while they themselves spend a couple of years under Nazi occupation, but they might have differed on this question had they known just how brutal Nazi occupation was actually going to be for them.

    Replies: @Gerard1234

    , @Yevardian
    @Gerard1234


    Dumbass – literally the only thing scum as Hitler was not completely wrong on you are trying to criticise. The whole western world (effectively) supported Hitler taking Poland you dimwit.
     
    Seems likely. At what point, why and how do you think the "Phony-War" between Hitler and the Western powers became a real one?
    On what points and to what degree do you think Irving, Rezun, Unz or utu are/were wrong, and by malice, mistaken intepretations or willful self-deception?

    Replies: @Gerard1234

  505. @silviosilver
    @Yahya

    Well, whites are the meekest race, so maybe there's hope yet.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Yahya, @Mr. XYZ

    Well, whites are the meekest race, so maybe there’s hope yet.

    John Derbyshire put it best when he said “white people are pussies”.

    This short and elegant sentence explains much of what has been happening recently in the West.

    This behavior seems to be cultural; whites used to be as ruthless as one can be just a few centuries ago.

    But the long prosperity has softened them.

    The Christian morality of “love thy neighbor” and “turn thy cheek” didn’t help one bit either.

    • Replies: @Greasy William
    @Yahya


    The Christian morality of “love thy neighbor” and “turn thy cheek” didn’t help one bit either.
     
    Arab Christians are definitely not meek. They are much tougher than the Muslims

    Replies: @Yahya, @Mr. XYZ

    , @Ivashka the fool
    @Yahya


    whites used to be as ruthless as one can be just a few centuries ago.
     
    Less than a hundred years ago. Some still are. But yeah, comfort makes people soft, happened to your kin too, didn't it ?

    In Al Andalous for example, where they started wearing lace and making the first fashion parades, while White Christian mercenaries such as El Cid protected them from the Berbers who came from the desert to restore some order among these degenerates.

    Ibn Khaldun was right, civilization makes people soft. They need barbarians to inject some new blood into that stagnation.

    Replies: @Yahya

    , @Yevardian
    @Yahya


    The Christian morality of “love thy neighbor” and “turn thy cheek” didn’t help one bit either.
     
    I'll take that of Islam's promotion of extreme clannishness, fatalism and incestuous-marriages.
    Over the long-term and certainly into the Christian era, Europe has historically always been by far the bloodiest continent even relative to the Middle-East, the past 70 years are an abberation.

    John Derbyshire came out as a white nationalist of a rather virulent variety (certainly he lacks Jared Taylor's graceful manners) whilst being married to an Asian wife with mixed children, definitely something a little off about him.

    Replies: @Coconuts

    , @silviosilver
    @Yahya


    John Derbyshire put it best when he said “white people are pussies”.
     
    More accurately, they are self-abnegating wankers; the timidity flows as a consequence.
  506. @Gerard1234
    @Mr. Hack

    Again, with the cretinous cartoons Hack


    The old Hitler was wrong then, as the new Putler is wrong today.
     
    Dumbass - literally the only thing scum as Hitler was not completely wrong on you are trying to criticise. The whole western world (effectively) supported Hitler taking Poland you dimwit. Actions by western states after September 1939 and then from after the Yalta conference confirm Poland got what it deserved.

    He was an evil level of wrong to mass murder Jews in Poland, but the treatment of Polish nationalists and their worthless cretin fascist-dictatorship state was perfectly socially acceptable behaviour because the Poles were just as bad. Polish imperialism was far more in area and worse than Nazi imperialism at the time.

    The only similarity now is that, strictly on Polish-German relations ONLY, the Nazi demands to Poland were perfectly reasonable ........and of course Russian demands to fuckheadistan puppet state now were perfectly reasonable.

    Comparisons are completely lazy. Despite the BS propaganda fed to a muppet like you Hack, clearly outside of our own land of Ukraine, we have zero intention to take shithole Poland/Baltics or Czechia, Bulgaria etc.

    Hitler presumably didn't take 6 million Polish refugees in, or 4 million in the preceeding 8 years. Presumably Polands last 2 Presidents then were not in the top 1% of taxpayers into Nazi germany state finances of the preceeding 30 years

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Yevardian

    the Nazi demands to Poland were perfectly reasonable

    I think that the more important point here is that short of Germany being routed on the battlefield (which actually did eventually occur in real life, at an extraordinarily high cost), Germany was probably unlikely to offer Poland better peace terms even under a post-Nazi German regime (in the event of a successful anti-Nazi coup in Germany). After all, even Weimar Germany deeply resented the Danzig/Polish Corridor situation and did not view it as permanently binding on it.

    Maybe without the benefit of hindsight, the Poles felt that it was best for the Anglo-French to suffer a lot on their behalf while they themselves spend a couple of years under Nazi occupation, but they might have differed on this question had they known just how brutal Nazi occupation was actually going to be for them.

    • Replies: @Gerard1234
    @Mr. XYZ

    Yes.

    Poland's 2 best allies until March 1939, actually their only true friends......were Nazi Germany and Japan.

    Undoubtedly the Poles were planning for and inciting for a Nazi Germany-Poland-Japan joint-invasion of the USSR. The further into the 1930's then the less likely of Japan participating in a joint war against the Soviet Union because of our own clashes with Japan in the same period and some good Soviet diplomatic moves after 1935. Poland and Nazi Germany were united in their "principles", of wanting to destroy the USSR, and the Danzig/Polish corridor situation was easily solveable, but as ever with 2 rats together, the problem wasn't because of Danzig itself - but on the issue of Polish nujtob imperialism clashing with German liebensraum ambitions over the same territory of Banderastan. War against people of USSR was definite, they were just waiting to finish agreeing trade-0ff on these issues.
    As ever with Polish nutjobs, their schizophrenia of being war-lusting animals AND total cowards/pussys lead them to destruction.

    Polish intelligence services were intensely working throughout the 1930's to make this war happen - in the Russian Far East and of course its well known they sent masses of their own "civilians" into the western parts of Ukrainian and Belarus SSR to settle. The NKVD worked well but too late as this intelligence work by the Poles in these areas was very useful to the german preparation for Barbarossa.


    Maybe without the benefit of hindsight, the Poles felt that it was best for the Anglo-French to suffer a lot on their behalf
     
    This is interesting in that Polish scum like pretending to be French, and have traditionally always sucked French d**k, primarily because of France did Poland exist in the interwar period anyway.........which makes inexplicable Polish losers not signing a pact against Germany with France - a true stab in the back. Their own imperialistic ambitions, primarily with Belarus , Ukraine, western Russia, Lithuania, their own intense intelligence activity in USSR and their own attempts at Nazi-Poland-Japan joint invasion are the only plausible explanations of why no pact against Nazi's with France.

    The one thing that appears obvious to me is that a France-Czechoslovakia-Poland pact before 1939 would have stopped WW2, or at worst delayed it. Huge industrial capacity in France and Czecholovakia, exceeding Nazi Germany's. 3 big armies and populations, exceeding Nazi Germany's.
    East and west borders of Germany surrounded, some agreement with Britain's Royal Navy would result in French and Britain Navy's blockading the north of Germany from the Baltic Sea. A France-Czechoslovakia-USSR deal was achieved , but then of course prevented by Poland.

    So entirely because of Poland, there was no France-Czech-Poland alliance , which if created would have prevented any Nazi war.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

  507. @Greasy William
    @Mr. XYZ

    The US public will demand surrender once a carrier is suck

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    I don’t know. Some Russia-appeasers in the US are China hawks, after all.

  508. @silviosilver
    @Yahya

    Well, whites are the meekest race, so maybe there's hope yet.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Yahya, @Mr. XYZ

    Whites are also the hottest race lol. Even in comparison to East Asians. Especially white women. For men, it’s less clear-cut lol.

    • Replies: @QCIC
    @Mr. XYZ

    Beauty is a concept that really only applies to women. Using the idea of beauty in other contexts is a metaphor, IMO. Men are all ugly.

    White men may have the best combination of mental and physical competence. There may be some races in which the men are more capable physically (not obvious) and others who are more capable mentally (also not obvious), but the White combination seems to be tops.

    White women are the most attractive, at least to me.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    , @silviosilver
    @Mr. XYZ

    Maybe "the hottest" is what Jesus meant to say. That would be rather welcome news. Maybe some conspiratard with a historical bent should concoct a link to some Aramaic term for attractiveness. It would do just that little bit to make the future something to once again look forward to, instead of something to dread.

    But I must take issue with this:


    Even in comparison to East Asians.
     
    What do you mean "even in comparison", as if there they are somehow close competitors. Rolling eyes.

    Then again the argument from aesthetics is even more useless than the argument from intelligence. Whites themselves dismiss it as mere "supremacism" - of an even more obvious variety - without a second's thought. And the far white right goes even nuttier with it than it does with intelligence, as recently seen on that trainwreck of a comment thread to Tobias Langdon's "facial fascist" post.

  509. @Mikel
    Having followed Prigozhin's Special Military Operation online last Saturday, as well as read plenty of commentary from multiple sources, my theory of what really happened is the following:

    Prigozhin is much smarter than the Sovok boomers at the helm of the Russian military/security apparatus, as revealed by the fact that he understands the internet and was actually in charge of some cyber troll enterprise. It is therefore no surprise that the PMC that he organized was able to perform much better than the regular Russian forces. Having seen first hand the incompetence of the Russian military and how it translates to massive loss of life at the front, he got fed up and started a feud with the top brass that eventually led him to rebel against them, being on the verge of entering Moscow with his troops. At the last moment, either he found less support in certain ranks than he had expected or he was genuinely convinced that he shouldn't carry on with an action that was going to cause many deaths and damage to Russia.

    IOW, things often really are what they look like. Most of the time, actually, as every adult should be able to conclude by just observing life around them. But for some reason many people have trouble translating their real life experience to broader realms. Hence all the disparate and wild fantasies one has to go through when reading commentary on any big event in the news. Prediction: Unz will soon start posting threads of many thousands of words trying to prove that none of the above is what really happened and possibly launching an ever wilder theory than anything we've read so far.

    Replies: @Greasy William, @Sean, @Yevardian, @AP

    I think that’s mostly right. Wagner was going to be dissolved so Prig launched a quasi coup against Shoigu. The purpose of the not coup was not to push out Shoigu, but to allow Wagner to keep its independence.

    But then Putin went on TV and declared Prigozhin to a be a traitor so Prigozhin either needed to make a deal or face certain death. Sensing opportunity, Lukashenko offered Pirgozhin the ability to keep Wagner as an independent force in Belarus. Putin, cautious by nature and not wanting to risk internal bloodshed, agreed to the deal with the intention of going back on it as soon as possible. Already the FSB is talking about prosecuting Prigozhin.

    Russia is Magog, but I no longer think that Putin is Gog. Now I just think he’s an idiot. This not coup has brought closer a nationalist takeover of the RF and that guy will be Gog.

    • Replies: @Mikel
    @Greasy William

    I think you're mostly right too. If we leave the gog and magog lunacy aside, I agree with the rest.

    Replies: @Greasy William

    , @S
    @Greasy William


    Russia is Magog, but I no longer think that Putin is Gog. Now I just think he’s an idiot. This not coup has brought closer a nationalist takeover of the RF and that guy will be Gog.
     
    This is a sensitive subject, but I'd be curious about your thoughts on these matters:

    A few years ago there was an organization of Christians, Moslems, and Jews (possibly now defunct) whom were concerned about the 'end time beliefs' of these spiritual systems potentially coming about in the near term, not due to God, but due to man made self fulfilling prophecies.

    Possibly related, many of the major characters on the present world stage, ie Zelensky, Prigozhin, Jared Kushner, Putin, Biden, Trump, etc, are either wholly (or largely) Jewish, or, are Gentile, but have many Jewish advisers they rely upon to govern.

    In the past there was the 1666 Sabattai Zevi debacle, and a long list (take a number!) of other Jewish false messiah claimants (see two links below), some of these at least also involving complicated dating calculations purportedly derived from Jewish scripture.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sabbateans

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Jewish_messiah_claimants

    As you probably know, anybody seen as a serious contender to be the Jewish messiah in present times, would almost certainly be seen by many Christians as the Anti-christ.

    We shall see.

    I mention the gregarious Jared Kushner here as I have commented upon in the past, that without stretching things, one can find in almost every major historical event of ancient Rome it's uncanny close parallel in the history of the New Rome, ie the United States.

    Relatedly, the First Triumvirate consisting of 'Rome's richest man', the Roman billionaire and real estate speculator Marcus Crassus, his up and coming political protégé Julius Caesar, and the Roman general Pompey, has it's close parallel in Donald Trump, his political protege Jared Kushner, and the army veteran Mike Pompeo.

    The First Triumvirate it will be recalled emerged as Rome was transitioning from a republic to a dictatorship. After Crassus' untimely death, the Triumvirate (and Rome itself) devolved into civil war between it's two surviving members, Pompey and Caesar. Caesar ultimately prevailed.

    One peculiar thing about Kushner (other than an unpleasant facial grimace he sometimes unconsciously displays) which is remindful of Sabattai Zevi and his 1666 false messiah proclamation, is the insistence Kushner had in purchasing that albatross hugely expensive property at 666 W Fifth Ave.

    Was this an inside joke showing his disdain towards Christian prophecy, or possibly something else? [See Kushner link below]

    https://www.jtrue.com/blog/the-second-coming

    Replies: @Another Polish Perspective, @Greasy William

  510. @Yahya
    @silviosilver


    Well, whites are the meekest race, so maybe there’s hope yet.
     
    John Derbyshire put it best when he said “white people are pussies”.

    This short and elegant sentence explains much of what has been happening recently in the West.

    This behavior seems to be cultural; whites used to be as ruthless as one can be just a few centuries ago.

    But the long prosperity has softened them.

    The Christian morality of “love thy neighbor” and “turn thy cheek” didn't help one bit either.

    Replies: @Greasy William, @Ivashka the fool, @Yevardian, @silviosilver

    The Christian morality of “love thy neighbor” and “turn thy cheek” didn’t help one bit either.

    Arab Christians are definitely not meek. They are much tougher than the Muslims

    • Replies: @Yahya
    @Greasy William


    Arab Christians are definitely not meek. They are much tougher than the Muslims
     
    I am aware. Arab Christians are operating under an Arab-Islamic cultural framework that makes it inappropriate to use them as basis for comparison though.

    Christianity isn’t the sole variable, but I can’t imagine getting drilled with “love”, “forgiveness” and “charity” for a millennium can do anything but soften a people. OTOH, it is only when coupled with contingent factors that Christianity takes its toll on a person’s manhood. It was hard for Christians to be forgiving and charitable back when they couldn’t put food on their own tables. But ease and comfort brought Christian values to the fore. Ironically, today’s West is a more accurate reflection of Christian teachings than the Medieval West, when Christians were out raping and pillaging and genociding and all that other stuff Christians shouldn’t do.

    Replies: @Coconuts

    , @Mr. XYZ
    @Greasy William

    For that matter, non-Arab Christians who have spent over a century living among Muslims are also pretty tough: Armenians, Georgians, the formerly Algerian pieds-noirs, et cetera.

  511. @Emil Nikola Richard
    Battle of the Nations
    Latvia Czechia

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gkJhFHbRNVI&ab_channel=WTA

    Replies: @LatW, @Gerard1234

    In true Baltic Nazi subhuman lowlife tradition………her real name is not actually Jelena. Something to do with the stupid rules they have on giving the children Russian names. She has had a good career, but too inconsistent. More consistant in tournament-by tournament performance than Kvitova, but without Kvitova’s level of talent.

    Krejcikova, unbelievably, has lost in 1st round in French open for 2 years, after winning it 3 years before. Probably will do well at Wimbledon.

    • Replies: @LatW
    @Gerard1234


    She has had a good career, but too inconsistent.
     
    True, but this one is well earned, excellent precision. She's peaking. Wish she was a bit more verbally disciplined (but it's understandable, it's tough).

    her real name is not actually Jelena. Something to do with the stupid rules they have on giving the children Russian names.
     
    Not at all, there are no rules about giving children names. But there is a name's day calendar, which mostly contains Latvian names (and classical European and Slavic names such as Alexander, Andrei, Stanislav, and other common names such as Sergei and Ludmila as well). It simply does not contain all names that parents choose to give. The name her parents chose, Alyona, just happened to not be in the calendar at the time she was born, so they wrote down Jelena. It happens (neither is mine). They added a day "for all those whose name is not on the calendar", very gracious. lol

    It is именины in Russian, a tradition started for the Christian saints. It's a cute tradition (that I don't really care about). You can show up with presents uninvited. :)

  512. @Yahya
    @silviosilver


    Well, whites are the meekest race, so maybe there’s hope yet.
     
    John Derbyshire put it best when he said “white people are pussies”.

    This short and elegant sentence explains much of what has been happening recently in the West.

    This behavior seems to be cultural; whites used to be as ruthless as one can be just a few centuries ago.

    But the long prosperity has softened them.

    The Christian morality of “love thy neighbor” and “turn thy cheek” didn't help one bit either.

    Replies: @Greasy William, @Ivashka the fool, @Yevardian, @silviosilver

    whites used to be as ruthless as one can be just a few centuries ago.

    Less than a hundred years ago. Some still are. But yeah, comfort makes people soft, happened to your kin too, didn’t it ?

    In Al Andalous for example, where they started wearing lace and making the first fashion parades, while White Christian mercenaries such as El Cid protected them from the Berbers who came from the desert to restore some order among these degenerates.

    Ibn Khaldun was right, civilization makes people soft. They need barbarians to inject some new blood into that stagnation.

    • Replies: @Yahya
    @Ivashka the fool

    Somewhat OT, but have you read Ibn Tufayl’s Hayy Ibn Yaqzan: A Philosophical Tale, or as it was known in the Latin West, Philosophus Autodidactus?

    The book tells the tale of a young child who finds himself stranded on a remote and isolated island; and his gradual recognition of philosophical and mystical truths as he passes through his life.

    The idea underlying the story is to show how human capacity may, unassisted by any external help, attain to the knowledge of the higher world, and so by degrees find out its dependence upon a superior Being, the immortality of the soul, and other questions of the highest importance. In short, it describes the gradual awakening of the soul, the evolution of an original mind from its first groping in the dark to the heights of philosophical speculation.

    Though relatively brief in length, it touches on a wide range of philosophical notions, from the mystical philosophy of Avicenna; to the philosophical mysticism of Al-Ghazali; and the universal unity of Plotinus. Apparently, the book has influenced a variety of Western Enlightenment figures such as Voltaire, Locke, Boyle, Defoe, Rousseau. You can certainly see the plot line’s influence on Daniel Defoe’s Robinson Crusoe.

    I think you would find the volume of interest.

    https://www.amazon.com/Ibn-Tufayls-Hayy-Yaqzan-Philosophical-ebook/dp/B00XL18XCC/ref=tmm_kin_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=1687831929&sr=1-1

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

  513. @Greasy William
    @Yahya


    The Christian morality of “love thy neighbor” and “turn thy cheek” didn’t help one bit either.
     
    Arab Christians are definitely not meek. They are much tougher than the Muslims

    Replies: @Yahya, @Mr. XYZ

    Arab Christians are definitely not meek. They are much tougher than the Muslims

    I am aware. Arab Christians are operating under an Arab-Islamic cultural framework that makes it inappropriate to use them as basis for comparison though.

    Christianity isn’t the sole variable, but I can’t imagine getting drilled with “love”, “forgiveness” and “charity” for a millennium can do anything but soften a people. OTOH, it is only when coupled with contingent factors that Christianity takes its toll on a person’s manhood. It was hard for Christians to be forgiving and charitable back when they couldn’t put food on their own tables. But ease and comfort brought Christian values to the fore. Ironically, today’s West is a more accurate reflection of Christian teachings than the Medieval West, when Christians were out raping and pillaging and genociding and all that other stuff Christians shouldn’t do.

    • Replies: @Coconuts
    @Yahya


    Christianity isn’t the sole variable, but I can’t imagine getting drilled with “love”, “forgiveness” and “charity” for a millennium can do anything but soften a people.
     
    Does this track closely with what is observable? Christian Europe could still turn in the 1914-18 and 1939-45 performances after a millennia and a half of this softening. They had better and more dependable food supplies than before then.

    But ease and comfort brought Christian values to the fore.
     
    There is the issue that in Western Europe (don't know about the US) the number of people who even identify as Christian is always shrinking and the Christians are usually in the older age groups, general rule is that the older the age group the more of them there are.

    Christian values around sexual morality seem mostly to be gone (the arguments that sexual morality in the West is now closer to later pagan era Roman Empire seem pretty strong) and the radical charity and asceticism, spiritual activity like prayer and worship are increasingly no longer observable either.

    This is possibly because, starting with guys like Hegel and Rousseau, a new conception of 'authentic (secular) Christianity' was created:


    The history of the Christian World is therefore the history of the progressive realisation of this ideal state where man will be finally 'satisfied' by realising his individuality - a synthesis of the Universal and the Particular, the Slave and the Master, of Labour and Struggle. But, in order to realise this state, man must shift his gaze away from the Beyond and fix it on the here below and act uniquely in view of what is here below. In other words, it is necessary to eliminate the Christian idea of transcendence. This is why the evolution of the Christian world has a double sense: one the one had there is real evolution, which prepares the social and political conditions for the advent of the 'absolute' State, on the other an ideal evolution which eliminates the ideal of transcendence, which brings Heaven to Earth as Hegel puts it.
     
    From Kojeve, ...Lecture de Hegel.

    It will probably be why the idea that authentic Christianity is being able to say the Nicean Creed at the same time as receiving the sacraments from a priest ordained by a bishop with correct apostolic succession sounds weird, even though for most of European history these would be the main criteria.

  514. @Greasy William
    @Mikel

    I think that's mostly right. Wagner was going to be dissolved so Prig launched a quasi coup against Shoigu. The purpose of the not coup was not to push out Shoigu, but to allow Wagner to keep its independence.

    But then Putin went on TV and declared Prigozhin to a be a traitor so Prigozhin either needed to make a deal or face certain death. Sensing opportunity, Lukashenko offered Pirgozhin the ability to keep Wagner as an independent force in Belarus. Putin, cautious by nature and not wanting to risk internal bloodshed, agreed to the deal with the intention of going back on it as soon as possible. Already the FSB is talking about prosecuting Prigozhin.

    Russia is Magog, but I no longer think that Putin is Gog. Now I just think he's an idiot. This not coup has brought closer a nationalist takeover of the RF and that guy will be Gog.

    Replies: @Mikel, @S

    I think you’re mostly right too. If we leave the gog and magog lunacy aside, I agree with the rest.

    • Replies: @Greasy William
    @Mikel

    Even if you don't believe in the prophecies, Magog definitely is Russia. Josephus clearly identifies Magog as being Russia. Keep in mind that Moscow is directly to the north of Jerusalem and I believe that Moscow metro and Jerusalem metro actually intersect latitudely.

  515. @Ivashka the fool
    @Yahya


    whites used to be as ruthless as one can be just a few centuries ago.
     
    Less than a hundred years ago. Some still are. But yeah, comfort makes people soft, happened to your kin too, didn't it ?

    In Al Andalous for example, where they started wearing lace and making the first fashion parades, while White Christian mercenaries such as El Cid protected them from the Berbers who came from the desert to restore some order among these degenerates.

    Ibn Khaldun was right, civilization makes people soft. They need barbarians to inject some new blood into that stagnation.

    Replies: @Yahya

    Somewhat OT, but have you read Ibn Tufayl’s Hayy Ibn Yaqzan: A Philosophical Tale, or as it was known in the Latin West, Philosophus Autodidactus?

    The book tells the tale of a young child who finds himself stranded on a remote and isolated island; and his gradual recognition of philosophical and mystical truths as he passes through his life.

    The idea underlying the story is to show how human capacity may, unassisted by any external help, attain to the knowledge of the higher world, and so by degrees find out its dependence upon a superior Being, the immortality of the soul, and other questions of the highest importance. In short, it describes the gradual awakening of the soul, the evolution of an original mind from its first groping in the dark to the heights of philosophical speculation.

    Though relatively brief in length, it touches on a wide range of philosophical notions, from the mystical philosophy of Avicenna; to the philosophical mysticism of Al-Ghazali; and the universal unity of Plotinus. Apparently, the book has influenced a variety of Western Enlightenment figures such as Voltaire, Locke, Boyle, Defoe, Rousseau. You can certainly see the plot line’s influence on Daniel Defoe’s Robinson Crusoe.

    I think you would find the volume of interest.

    [MORE]

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @Yahya

    I read it many years ago, while reading about Sufism and Islamic esoterism in general.

    Interesting book of medieval thought applied to the analysis of the Real.

    Speaking of which, do they teach in Egypt that its highest level of medieval Islamic development has been reached under the Ismaili Fatimid dynasty ?

    That's how Nasir Khosrow described his travel to Cairo to study at the Ismaili Dua University:

    https://simerg.com/literary-readings/cairo-in-the-light-of-nasir-khusraws-safarnama/

    Replies: @Yahya

  516. @Mikel
    @Greasy William

    I think you're mostly right too. If we leave the gog and magog lunacy aside, I agree with the rest.

    Replies: @Greasy William

    Even if you don’t believe in the prophecies, Magog definitely is Russia. Josephus clearly identifies Magog as being Russia. Keep in mind that Moscow is directly to the north of Jerusalem and I believe that Moscow metro and Jerusalem metro actually intersect latitudely.

  517. @Mr. XYZ
    @silviosilver

    Whites are also the hottest race lol. Even in comparison to East Asians. Especially white women. For men, it's less clear-cut lol.

    Replies: @QCIC, @silviosilver

    Beauty is a concept that really only applies to women. Using the idea of beauty in other contexts is a metaphor, IMO. Men are all ugly.

    White men may have the best combination of mental and physical competence. There may be some races in which the men are more capable physically (not obvious) and others who are more capable mentally (also not obvious), but the White combination seems to be tops.

    White women are the most attractive, at least to me.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @QCIC

    Some men are beautiful, such as F1NN5TER.

  518. @Yahya
    @Ivashka the fool

    Somewhat OT, but have you read Ibn Tufayl’s Hayy Ibn Yaqzan: A Philosophical Tale, or as it was known in the Latin West, Philosophus Autodidactus?

    The book tells the tale of a young child who finds himself stranded on a remote and isolated island; and his gradual recognition of philosophical and mystical truths as he passes through his life.

    The idea underlying the story is to show how human capacity may, unassisted by any external help, attain to the knowledge of the higher world, and so by degrees find out its dependence upon a superior Being, the immortality of the soul, and other questions of the highest importance. In short, it describes the gradual awakening of the soul, the evolution of an original mind from its first groping in the dark to the heights of philosophical speculation.

    Though relatively brief in length, it touches on a wide range of philosophical notions, from the mystical philosophy of Avicenna; to the philosophical mysticism of Al-Ghazali; and the universal unity of Plotinus. Apparently, the book has influenced a variety of Western Enlightenment figures such as Voltaire, Locke, Boyle, Defoe, Rousseau. You can certainly see the plot line’s influence on Daniel Defoe’s Robinson Crusoe.

    I think you would find the volume of interest.

    https://www.amazon.com/Ibn-Tufayls-Hayy-Yaqzan-Philosophical-ebook/dp/B00XL18XCC/ref=tmm_kin_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=1687831929&sr=1-1

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

    I read it many years ago, while reading about Sufism and Islamic esoterism in general.

    Interesting book of medieval thought applied to the analysis of the Real.

    Speaking of which, do they teach in Egypt that its highest level of medieval Islamic development has been reached under the Ismaili Fatimid dynasty ?

    That’s how Nasir Khosrow described his travel to Cairo to study at the Ismaili Dua University:

    https://simerg.com/literary-readings/cairo-in-the-light-of-nasir-khusraws-safarnama/

    • Replies: @Yahya
    @Ivashka the fool


    Speaking of which, do they teach in Egypt that its highest level of medieval Islamic development has been reached under the Ismaili Fatimid dynasty ?
     
    Not from what I remember.

    In Egyptian history class, we mostly touched upon Muhammad Ali’s reign, the Crusades, and the Golden Age.

    My primary education was Anglo-centric though.

    Ismaili’s are the crème-de-la-crème of the Islamic world.

    Some of my ancestors were likely Ismailis.

  519. @Gerard1234
    @Emil Nikola Richard

    In true Baltic Nazi subhuman lowlife tradition.........her real name is not actually Jelena. Something to do with the stupid rules they have on giving the children Russian names. She has had a good career, but too inconsistent. More consistant in tournament-by tournament performance than Kvitova, but without Kvitova's level of talent.

    Krejcikova, unbelievably, has lost in 1st round in French open for 2 years, after winning it 3 years before. Probably will do well at Wimbledon.

    Replies: @LatW

    She has had a good career, but too inconsistent.

    True, but this one is well earned, excellent precision. She’s peaking. Wish she was a bit more verbally disciplined (but it’s understandable, it’s tough).

    her real name is not actually Jelena. Something to do with the stupid rules they have on giving the children Russian names.

    Not at all, there are no rules about giving children names. But there is a name’s day calendar, which mostly contains Latvian names (and classical European and Slavic names such as Alexander, Andrei, Stanislav, and other common names such as Sergei and Ludmila as well). It simply does not contain all names that parents choose to give. The name her parents chose, Alyona, just happened to not be in the calendar at the time she was born, so they wrote down Jelena. It happens (neither is mine). They added a day “for all those whose name is not on the calendar”, very gracious. lol

    It is именины in Russian, a tradition started for the Christian saints. It’s a cute tradition (that I don’t really care about). You can show up with presents uninvited. 🙂

  520. @Mikel
    Having followed Prigozhin's Special Military Operation online last Saturday, as well as read plenty of commentary from multiple sources, my theory of what really happened is the following:

    Prigozhin is much smarter than the Sovok boomers at the helm of the Russian military/security apparatus, as revealed by the fact that he understands the internet and was actually in charge of some cyber troll enterprise. It is therefore no surprise that the PMC that he organized was able to perform much better than the regular Russian forces. Having seen first hand the incompetence of the Russian military and how it translates to massive loss of life at the front, he got fed up and started a feud with the top brass that eventually led him to rebel against them, being on the verge of entering Moscow with his troops. At the last moment, either he found less support in certain ranks than he had expected or he was genuinely convinced that he shouldn't carry on with an action that was going to cause many deaths and damage to Russia.

    IOW, things often really are what they look like. Most of the time, actually, as every adult should be able to conclude by just observing life around them. But for some reason many people have trouble translating their real life experience to broader realms. Hence all the disparate and wild fantasies one has to go through when reading commentary on any big event in the news. Prediction: Unz will soon start posting threads of many thousands of words trying to prove that none of the above is what really happened and possibly launching an ever wilder theory than anything we've read so far.

    Replies: @Greasy William, @Sean, @Yevardian, @AP

    Scott Adams’s explanation for the Russian army’s performance is that in 2021 Putin asked Chief of the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces and First Deputy Minister of Defence Gerasimov how long it would take to subdue Ukraine in an attack from a standing start (ie with the forces currently in the build up around Ukraine) and Gerasimov–thinking that it was just a hypothetical ego trip conversation– replied ‘a week or so’. Whereupon, Putin told the hapless army commander ‘Right do it then’. The Russian General Staff would surely have amassed a far larger and more balanced force had they understood the build up was not for military’s pressure on the border but an an actual invasion with the Promethean task of conquering Europe’s largest country defended by a determined army with combat experience, home advantage, and US intel and arms assistance.

    I think the majority of the Russian army privately blame Gerasimov for not quickly insisting after the initial disappointing results that a Special Military Operation level of force was inadequate and there needed to be a much more intense effort to mobilise Russia and field a war-winning army. Russia is still officially engaged in a mere SNO rather than a war! Prigozhin is an ex con who made his real money in casinos (some muscle would be required to get into that business back in the day) and so by neither temperament or career training is he that good soldier obeying any order no matter how stupid; he has got where he is by being willing to use violence insofar it suited his purpose. I think Prigozhin was trying to get through to Putin that the conflict with Ukraine is something Russia needs to get a grip and take hard decisions about: either fight to force a decision in the foreseeable future or dial down the effort to advance and effectively start to look for a way of ending the hostilities.

    But for some reason many people have trouble translating their real life experience to broader realms. Hence all the disparate and wild fantasies one has to go through when reading commentary on any big event in the news.

    Yes. Still it can be entertaining to read and come up with those kids of things oneself. Like working a speed bag for a boxer, which looks stupid but is training him to keep his hands up (the most important thing in boxing), speculating about events as if they are part of a grand design to manipulate and control the public is good preparation for more serious thinking. Gets the blood pumping round the brain. And even if rarely true when well done even wildest speculation can be appreciated as a work of art.

    “Oakeshott loved Shakespeare. In all the odd and quirky characters–from Falstaff to Bushy, from Benedik to Hamlet and Macbeth–he saw what a free society could create, not in terms of projects or goals or abstractions, but in terms of the human beings that are allowed to flourish with all their idiosyncrasies and faults and character traits. This was for Oakeshott a wonder to behold. Every person he met was a character, or at least a potential character. And he saw the point of liberal democracy as giving individuals the ability to more fully become themselves, to ripen and mature in all their idiosyncrasies and differences. All of life, Oakeshott argues, is an adventure. Let’s see what I can become. Let’s see what I can make of my life. Let’s greet life and its difficulties and exigencies and unpredictable nature as an opportunity.”

  521. @Ivashka the fool
    @Yahya

    I read it many years ago, while reading about Sufism and Islamic esoterism in general.

    Interesting book of medieval thought applied to the analysis of the Real.

    Speaking of which, do they teach in Egypt that its highest level of medieval Islamic development has been reached under the Ismaili Fatimid dynasty ?

    That's how Nasir Khosrow described his travel to Cairo to study at the Ismaili Dua University:

    https://simerg.com/literary-readings/cairo-in-the-light-of-nasir-khusraws-safarnama/

    Replies: @Yahya

    Speaking of which, do they teach in Egypt that its highest level of medieval Islamic development has been reached under the Ismaili Fatimid dynasty ?

    Not from what I remember.

    In Egyptian history class, we mostly touched upon Muhammad Ali’s reign, the Crusades, and the Golden Age.

    My primary education was Anglo-centric though.

    Ismaili’s are the crème-de-la-crème of the Islamic world.

    Some of my ancestors were likely Ismailis.

    • Agree: Ivashka the fool
  522. @QCIC
    @Mr. XYZ

    Beauty is a concept that really only applies to women. Using the idea of beauty in other contexts is a metaphor, IMO. Men are all ugly.

    White men may have the best combination of mental and physical competence. There may be some races in which the men are more capable physically (not obvious) and others who are more capable mentally (also not obvious), but the White combination seems to be tops.

    White women are the most attractive, at least to me.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    Some men are beautiful, such as F1NN5TER.

  523. @LatW
    @Emil Nikola Richard


    Battle of the Nations
    Latvia Czechia
     
    She's a beast. I actually like that she put on all that mass, it looks like it only made her stronger and only helped. Well done, baby girl! 💐

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    I like how she’s of partially Ukrainian descent.

    • Replies: @LatW
    @Mr. XYZ


    I like how she’s of partially Ukrainian descent.
     
    Me too. Love my '-enkos'. Her parents are a really cool Russian-Ukrainian athletes couple. Those are quite common.
  524. AP says:
    @Mikhail
    @AP


    But they outnumbered Russians in 1897 and Russians themselves did not become a majority until World War II
     
    By a whopping 2% margin of roughly 35% to 33%. Your other idiotic comments are Soros new history like. The Tatars didn't predate the Rus Slav presence. In more present times, the Tatars are a clear minority in Crimea. The Tatars "absorbed" as in not having been there first.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @AP

    But they outnumbered Russians in 1897 and Russians themselves did not become a majority until World War II

    By a whopping 2% margin of roughly 35% to 33%.

    Yes, as I said they outnumbered Russians. And also as I said, Russians weren’t a majority until World War II. Everything I said was accurate. Unlike what you said.

    Your other idiotic comments are Soros new history like

    Which ones and how?

    I pointed out that Rus only ever had about 1% of Crimea.

    See, that tiny piece:

    The Tatars didn’t predate the Rus Slav presence

    The presence that only ever existed on 1% of Crimean territory (see above).

    And although the Tatar came later, the ancestors of the Crimean Tatars (Greeks, Ostrogoths, etc.) were there much earlier.

    https://catedra-unesco.espais.iec.cat/en/2017/03/20/20-the-crimean-tatars-who-they-are-and-where-they-come-from/

    The merging of the Mongols and the Turkic population in the north of the peninsula and of the same Turkic population and the Greeks and Byzantines from the south coast configured the Tatar people of Crimea, who were the main group in the peninsula until the beginning of the twentieth century, long after the Russian annexation of 1783.

    Clearly, the Crimean Tatars are heavily mixed with native non-Asians:

    ::::::::::::::::

    So, as I said: “your argument manages to be stupid on two levels: Crimean Tatars are descended from the pre-Tatar invasion inhabitants; and, the medieval Rus didn’t rule 99% of Crimean territory.”

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @AP

    The Tartars entered into Crimea as part of the Mongol invasions. They set up shop as Slave Traders for the Ottomans. They literally went on summer raids every year kidnapping Slavic women and boys to be sold in Istanbul.

    You are not doing yourself an favours with the reading audience here.

    The more interesting question is the Tartars based around Kazan and Sarai. They are all in warring on the Kievans.

    Replies: @AP

    , @Mikhail
    @AP

    The pre-Tatar invasion inhabitants weren't Tatars. The Rus Slav presence in Crimea predates that of the slave trading Crimean Tatars. You don't mention the Scythians. The Crimean Tatars haven't been a majority for quite some time. In more recent instances, they had a plurality. In even more recent instances they're the clear minority. Crimea has a rock solid well over 2/3 favoring reunification with Russia.

    Replies: @Beckow

  525. @Greasy William
    @Yahya


    The Christian morality of “love thy neighbor” and “turn thy cheek” didn’t help one bit either.
     
    Arab Christians are definitely not meek. They are much tougher than the Muslims

    Replies: @Yahya, @Mr. XYZ

    For that matter, non-Arab Christians who have spent over a century living among Muslims are also pretty tough: Armenians, Georgians, the formerly Algerian pieds-noirs, et cetera.

  526. @Mikel
    Having followed Prigozhin's Special Military Operation online last Saturday, as well as read plenty of commentary from multiple sources, my theory of what really happened is the following:

    Prigozhin is much smarter than the Sovok boomers at the helm of the Russian military/security apparatus, as revealed by the fact that he understands the internet and was actually in charge of some cyber troll enterprise. It is therefore no surprise that the PMC that he organized was able to perform much better than the regular Russian forces. Having seen first hand the incompetence of the Russian military and how it translates to massive loss of life at the front, he got fed up and started a feud with the top brass that eventually led him to rebel against them, being on the verge of entering Moscow with his troops. At the last moment, either he found less support in certain ranks than he had expected or he was genuinely convinced that he shouldn't carry on with an action that was going to cause many deaths and damage to Russia.

    IOW, things often really are what they look like. Most of the time, actually, as every adult should be able to conclude by just observing life around them. But for some reason many people have trouble translating their real life experience to broader realms. Hence all the disparate and wild fantasies one has to go through when reading commentary on any big event in the news. Prediction: Unz will soon start posting threads of many thousands of words trying to prove that none of the above is what really happened and possibly launching an ever wilder theory than anything we've read so far.

    Replies: @Greasy William, @Sean, @Yevardian, @AP

    Having seen first hand the incompetence of the Russian military and how it translates to massive loss of life at the front, he got fed up and started a feud with the top brass that eventually led him to rebel against them, being on the verge of entering Moscow with his troops. At the last moment, either he found less support in certain ranks than he had expected or he was genuinely convinced that he shouldn’t carry on with an action that was going to cause many deaths and damage to Russia.

    I agree with general gist of your whole post, except I think this interpretation somewhat discounts the fact that Prigozhin and Shoigu have hated each other for many years now, and it’s anyone’s guess how and when their feud started.
    As far as I recall (Ivashka/Bashibuzuk can fill in missing details or mistakes) Shoigu’s real career began with Yeltsin’s shelling of the White House in 1993 (the real deathdate of Russian democray, as anyone knows, and the event that convinced my family to decide on emigration, after the sabotage of Ter-Petrosyan) and the subsequent repression of any protests. Shoigu’s subsequent history shouldn’t inspire anyone he was promoted for military competence.

    Prigozhin’s claims of a deliberate missile attack on Wagner from the MOD seem to be a justifying exaggeration, but there’s no doubt that Shoigu and others in the army were actively trying to marginalise Wagner’s role, eventually escalating to small-scale sabotage, with the eventual goal of having Prigozhin removed from his position for months.

    Putin seems so AWOL from the day-to-day military developments of the SMO that I think the inter-service rivalry finally got completely out of hand, and Prigozhin impetuously tried this desperate mutinous action with hopes of retaining his position (and by extension, likely his life), or at least obtaining for himself some sort of exit.
    Certainly I don’t think a march all the way to Moscow was planned beforehand, but with the slowness of any official decisive reaction, events took their own course.

    • Replies: @Dmitry
    @Yevardian

    The most important information about Shoigu, is his family owns the "Ninja Warrior" franchise in Russia, Lavrov's family only owns KFC and similar things, Prigozhin owned a private army.

    It was only 4 years ago, I had still a bit of the reverse culture shock when I revisited for vacation a city in Russia after being in Europe, the largest advertisements in one of the main street billboards were advertising for a chain of brothels in the city. I was laughing about how the Europeans would view this culture. Brothels have some of the best advertising position of the businesses in the city's centre.

    This year, some of those same billboards, probably now adverts for "Wagner group" saying like join the winning team ("Вступай в команду победителей"). There was our "spiritual evolution".

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    , @Mikel
    @Yevardian


    this interpretation somewhat discounts the fact that Prigozhin and Shoigu have hated each other for many years now
     
    I guess there are many little details most of us don't know about but my point is that they don't matter too much. What matters is that something had to give at some point and it just did.

    Putin and his generals launched a catastrophically designed military adventure that has turned into a senseless carnage of thousands of Russians and civilians with no end in sight. When you do something like that you're very lucky to remain in power for long and Russia is not even a full dictatorship. There's lots of freedom of expression and the younger generations have as much access to information as anyone in the West. Just look like at AK, posting against the regime from Moscow on a US-based platform.

    If anything, Putin's survival of Prigozhin's SMO proves the still remarkable stability of his regime. But this isn't over. On the margins, Putin and Shoigu have already managed to turn a former alt-right, Trump-supporting blogger like AK into a sexually confused defender of open borders. As the tragedy continues to unfold, more mainstream sectors of the Russian society, including discontent cadres of the regime, will also defect. Ordinary people showing their support to the ex-convict in Rostov and the regular army refusing to fight him on his way to Moscow can only be a harbinger of things to come.

    Replies: @German_reader

  527. @Mr. XYZ
    @LatW

    I like how she's of partially Ukrainian descent.

    Replies: @LatW

    I like how she’s of partially Ukrainian descent.

    Me too. Love my ‘-enkos’. Her parents are a really cool Russian-Ukrainian athletes couple. Those are quite common.

  528. AP says:
    @Mikel
    Having followed Prigozhin's Special Military Operation online last Saturday, as well as read plenty of commentary from multiple sources, my theory of what really happened is the following:

    Prigozhin is much smarter than the Sovok boomers at the helm of the Russian military/security apparatus, as revealed by the fact that he understands the internet and was actually in charge of some cyber troll enterprise. It is therefore no surprise that the PMC that he organized was able to perform much better than the regular Russian forces. Having seen first hand the incompetence of the Russian military and how it translates to massive loss of life at the front, he got fed up and started a feud with the top brass that eventually led him to rebel against them, being on the verge of entering Moscow with his troops. At the last moment, either he found less support in certain ranks than he had expected or he was genuinely convinced that he shouldn't carry on with an action that was going to cause many deaths and damage to Russia.

    IOW, things often really are what they look like. Most of the time, actually, as every adult should be able to conclude by just observing life around them. But for some reason many people have trouble translating their real life experience to broader realms. Hence all the disparate and wild fantasies one has to go through when reading commentary on any big event in the news. Prediction: Unz will soon start posting threads of many thousands of words trying to prove that none of the above is what really happened and possibly launching an ever wilder theory than anything we've read so far.

    Replies: @Greasy William, @Sean, @Yevardian, @AP

    At the last moment, either he found less support in certain ranks than he had expected or he was genuinely convinced that he shouldn’t carry on with an action that was going to cause many deaths and damage to Russia.

    Apparently he, or if not he than many of his people, didn’t secure their family members, who were getting detained by the FSB as he marched on Moscow. These hostages may have contributed to his decision to stop the march.

    • Replies: @Sean
    @AP

    The greatest Ukrainian (Trotsky) won the Russian Civil War by taking hostage the families of Tsarist officers and forcing them to put their skills to work for the Red army. Solzhenitsyn cited the way Lenin and the other family of those who'd plotted to assassinate the Tsar being left alone (apart from having to change their names), showed that the Tsarist regime hadn't the will to totally crush their enemies by liquidating even those innocently associated with subversives.

    Wagner all have to sign contracts with the regular army in July. The mutiny got them much more lucrative terms that they were previously being compelled to agree to. But I think that getting high pay even as members of the regular army is only fair for the non penal Wagnerites who are volunteerist specialised assault infantry required to advance; no matter how adroitly they fight it is going into extreme danger.

    Replies: @Wokechoke

  529. @Gerard1234
    @Mr. Hack

    Again, with the cretinous cartoons Hack


    The old Hitler was wrong then, as the new Putler is wrong today.
     
    Dumbass - literally the only thing scum as Hitler was not completely wrong on you are trying to criticise. The whole western world (effectively) supported Hitler taking Poland you dimwit. Actions by western states after September 1939 and then from after the Yalta conference confirm Poland got what it deserved.

    He was an evil level of wrong to mass murder Jews in Poland, but the treatment of Polish nationalists and their worthless cretin fascist-dictatorship state was perfectly socially acceptable behaviour because the Poles were just as bad. Polish imperialism was far more in area and worse than Nazi imperialism at the time.

    The only similarity now is that, strictly on Polish-German relations ONLY, the Nazi demands to Poland were perfectly reasonable ........and of course Russian demands to fuckheadistan puppet state now were perfectly reasonable.

    Comparisons are completely lazy. Despite the BS propaganda fed to a muppet like you Hack, clearly outside of our own land of Ukraine, we have zero intention to take shithole Poland/Baltics or Czechia, Bulgaria etc.

    Hitler presumably didn't take 6 million Polish refugees in, or 4 million in the preceeding 8 years. Presumably Polands last 2 Presidents then were not in the top 1% of taxpayers into Nazi germany state finances of the preceeding 30 years

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Yevardian

    Dumbass – literally the only thing scum as Hitler was not completely wrong on you are trying to criticise. The whole western world (effectively) supported Hitler taking Poland you dimwit.

    Seems likely. At what point, why and how do you think the “Phony-War” between Hitler and the Western powers became a real one?
    On what points and to what degree do you think Irving, Rezun, Unz or utu are/were wrong, and by malice, mistaken intepretations or willful self-deception?

    • Replies: @Gerard1234
    @Yevardian

    Hi there!

    Just signing into a pact does not require a nations MIC to be at optimal level to launch and maintain a war at the moment the pact is activated by the invasion. It should signal intent to start preparing for one though, which is what happened. Defence expenditures of Britain and France prove it. "Phony War" period seems legitimate to me.

    All types of things with any type of twisted logik can be tried to be justified - like the British bombing ships of the French navy off the Algerian coast, killing 1 or 2 thousand French sailors so the Nazis could not capture them. Studying the opponents tactics and weapons systems in combat against your own ally in the pact for a period of time , so as to help with your own training and design & engineering of own planes, tanks, bombs etc..... even if your ally gets badly annihilated in that time over several months , is also legitimate action - particularly if you think you are going to be invaded next. Obviously we can see this with the "to the last ukrop" orders of the west in 404, where to some extent the G. S of each side is happy with the other introducing a new weapons system into the SMO (though every Russian weapon has increased its reputation)

    The issue here is at what point it clear that the Normandy landings by the west are for completely different political reasons to the point of the Pact........ stopping the wonderful Red Army from liberating and taking all of Europe.

    Anyway, German oil ambitions /Italian imperialism in North Africa/ME against the British and French's own oil interests is probably what started the end of the Phony War stage.

    Britain always going to want to engage in North African war, where it can maximise its Navy's capabilities, with the conflict in the Mediterranean Sea to help army in the desert, far more than if engaged in continental war in France or Poland.

  530. AP says:
    @Ivashka the fool
    @AP

    The oldest Indian texts extant today are the Gandharan birch bark scrolls, first among which were discovered in the Swat Valley (ancient Udyana). These were written in Kharosti script, which Kanishka the Great made into the official alphabet, used within his Indo-Scythian Empire, replacing the Aramaic and Greek scripts that were used for the official communications for centuries since the Persian and Macedonian conquests of Northern Hindustan.

    The texts are more or less fragmented Buddhist Sutras, most of them canonical, although with some alterations. However, some of the smaller fragments correspond to the less well known or even completely unknown Buddhist scriptures, one of these tells the story of Bodhisattvas descending from the Buddhist paradise (the Tushita Heaven) to help suffering creatures in the worlds bellow. What is peculiar about this fragment, is that it literally names these Bodhisattvas Sons of God. Which is not very Buddhist according to the modern understanding. These scrolls date back to the time of the redaction of the Gospels. One of the Silk Road branches passed through that region. Aramaic and Greek were the lingua franca of the time along the Silk Road, the Gandharans were very much Hellenistic. Buddhist artifacts have been found in Egypt where Jesus spent his younger years, most probably in Alexandria, where nearly half the population were Hellenistic Jews.

    Another thing, in Mahayana Buddhist thought, the nature of the Enlightened sentient beings (Buddhas) is made of a kind of Trinity, which is literally called the Triple Body - the Trikaya. First among these is the Absolute, Universal Body of the Dharma - completely identical with the ground of being (Dharmakaya). The second is the Body of Bliss/Holy Rapture - pure joy and freedom energy (Samboghakaya). The third is the Body of Manifestation - physical body which appears in our troubled world to perform good deeds and save the beings that roam its infinite worlds without a hope of escape (Nirmanakaya).

    The last thing about Buddhism fir today, a Buddha is supposedly capable of creating Buddha Lands, pure kingdoms not of this world, to which he can guide the sentient beings that have faith in the salvation through Buddha's help. And a well advanced Bodhisattva is able to transfer his acquired merit to help alleviate the sins of the sentient beings. It is a very old doctrine, also present in Jainism.

    Finally, I have read somewhere, that the Orthodox missionaries among the pagan Slavs have written that they had a concept of the universal Godhood manifesting as various beings, but ultimately having the nature of the Pure White Light. Hence the expression Белый Свет, still used in Russian to this very day ro describe the manifested Universe.

    Given that you previously enjoyed the postpunk music that I have shared with you and commented about us having somewhat similar musical tastes, allow me to link a song that is directly related to my comment.

    The frontman of the NMA, Justin Sullivan is a Gnostic mystic and a shaman on top of being a fine poet and a radical ecologist. A fine example of Celtic spirit.

    https://youtu.be/WeRNMvPxJz0

    The song recounts one of his mystical experiences.

    White Light...

    Do you really think that this Pure White Light is not universal, but had to be specifically embodied in a young Galilean Rabbi (who according to what is written above in my comment might have been a Great Bodhisattva) ?

    What if your own purified mind was exactly this very same Pure White Light ?

    Would it be worthwhile to get a look into it ?

    Rhetorical questions.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luminous_mind

    Replies: @AP

    some of the smaller fragments correspond to the less well known or even completely unknown Buddhist scriptures, one of these tells the story of Bodhisattvas descending from the Buddhist paradise (the Tushita Heaven) to help suffering creatures in the worlds bellow. What is peculiar about this fragment, is that it literally names these Bodhisattvas Sons of God. Which is not very Buddhist according to the modern understanding…..Do you really think that this Pure White Light is not universal, but had to be specifically embodied in a young Galilean Rabbi (who according to what is written above in my comment might have been a Great Bodhisattva) ?

    In that case, would that not make Christianity much more than what you dismissingly refer to as Abrahamic faiths, like Islam or Judaism? And perhaps, even closer to older more original form of Buddhism, that has been lost?

    An interesting cycle. The knowledge of one God, dwelling in the sky, originated among the Aryans (Scythians), and was given form the Aryans to the Jews. And then God incarnated among the Jews, was rejected by most of them, but His faith was eventually adopted by the Aryans (or, their Slavic brothers).

    Given that you previously enjoyed the postpunk music that I have shared with you and commented about us having somewhat similar musical tastes, allow me to link a song that is directly related to my comment.

    Thank you, it was very nice.

  531. @Yahya
    @silviosilver


    Well, whites are the meekest race, so maybe there’s hope yet.
     
    John Derbyshire put it best when he said “white people are pussies”.

    This short and elegant sentence explains much of what has been happening recently in the West.

    This behavior seems to be cultural; whites used to be as ruthless as one can be just a few centuries ago.

    But the long prosperity has softened them.

    The Christian morality of “love thy neighbor” and “turn thy cheek” didn't help one bit either.

    Replies: @Greasy William, @Ivashka the fool, @Yevardian, @silviosilver

    The Christian morality of “love thy neighbor” and “turn thy cheek” didn’t help one bit either.

    I’ll take that of Islam’s promotion of extreme clannishness, fatalism and incestuous-marriages.
    Over the long-term and certainly into the Christian era, Europe has historically always been by far the bloodiest continent even relative to the Middle-East, the past 70 years are an abberation.

    John Derbyshire came out as a white nationalist of a rather virulent variety (certainly he lacks Jared Taylor’s graceful manners) whilst being married to an Asian wife with mixed children, definitely something a little off about him.

    • Replies: @Coconuts
    @Yevardian


    John Derbyshire came out as a white nationalist of a rather virulent variety (certainly he lacks Jared Taylor’s graceful manners) whilst being married to an Asian wife with mixed children, definitely something a little off about him.
     
    May be due to the influence of his wife. Two of the bigger British ethnonat Youtube channels around 2019-20 were run by guys living in East Asia with East Asian wives/girlfriends.

    I know my wife indirectly got me more interested in ethnonationalist topics than I had been before and she is a Belarusian liberal, it was just via exposure to a more nationalistic culture from outside the West.
  532. @AP
    @Mikel


    At the last moment, either he found less support in certain ranks than he had expected or he was genuinely convinced that he shouldn’t carry on with an action that was going to cause many deaths and damage to Russia.
     
    Apparently he, or if not he than many of his people, didn't secure their family members, who were getting detained by the FSB as he marched on Moscow. These hostages may have contributed to his decision to stop the march.

    Replies: @Sean

    The greatest Ukrainian (Trotsky) won the Russian Civil War by taking hostage the families of Tsarist officers and forcing them to put their skills to work for the Red army. Solzhenitsyn cited the way Lenin and the other family of those who’d plotted to assassinate the Tsar being left alone (apart from having to change their names), showed that the Tsarist regime hadn’t the will to totally crush their enemies by liquidating even those innocently associated with subversives.

    Wagner all have to sign contracts with the regular army in July. The mutiny got them much more lucrative terms that they were previously being compelled to agree to. But I think that getting high pay even as members of the regular army is only fair for the non penal Wagnerites who are volunteerist specialised assault infantry required to advance; no matter how adroitly they fight it is going into extreme danger.

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @Sean

    The Tsar was a softie. He should have annihilated the Jews.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

  533. @AP
    @Mikhail


    But they outnumbered Russians in 1897 and Russians themselves did not become a majority until World War II

    By a whopping 2% margin of roughly 35% to 33%.
     
    Yes, as I said they outnumbered Russians. And also as I said, Russians weren't a majority until World War II. Everything I said was accurate. Unlike what you said.

    Your other idiotic comments are Soros new history like
     
    Which ones and how?

    I pointed out that Rus only ever had about 1% of Crimea.

    See, that tiny piece:

    https://alchetron.com/cdn/tmutarakan-063f00d5-9d30-40e6-9eef-1afbb49cd57-resize-750.jpeg

    https://alchetron.com/cdn/tmutarakan-d9b18bf1-df1e-497d-960c-0d104d54465-resize-750.png

    The Tatars didn’t predate the Rus Slav presence
     
    The presence that only ever existed on 1% of Crimean territory (see above).

    And although the Tatar came later, the ancestors of the Crimean Tatars (Greeks, Ostrogoths, etc.) were there much earlier.

    https://catedra-unesco.espais.iec.cat/en/2017/03/20/20-the-crimean-tatars-who-they-are-and-where-they-come-from/

    The merging of the Mongols and the Turkic population in the north of the peninsula and of the same Turkic population and the Greeks and Byzantines from the south coast configured the Tatar people of Crimea, who were the main group in the peninsula until the beginning of the twentieth century, long after the Russian annexation of 1783.

    Clearly, the Crimean Tatars are heavily mixed with native non-Asians:

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/34/H%C4%B1d%C4%B1rellez_in_Crimea_11.jpg

    ::::::::::::::::

    So, as I said: "your argument manages to be stupid on two levels: Crimean Tatars are descended from the pre-Tatar invasion inhabitants; and, the medieval Rus didn’t rule 99% of Crimean territory."

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @Mikhail

    The Tartars entered into Crimea as part of the Mongol invasions. They set up shop as Slave Traders for the Ottomans. They literally went on summer raids every year kidnapping Slavic women and boys to be sold in Istanbul.

    You are not doing yourself an favours with the reading audience here.

    The more interesting question is the Tartars based around Kazan and Sarai. They are all in warring on the Kievans.

    • Agree: Mikhail
    • Replies: @AP
    @Wokechoke


    The Tartars entered into Crimea as part of the Mongol invasions. They set up shop as Slave Traders for the Ottomans. They literally went on summer raids every year kidnapping Slavic women and boys to be sold in Istanbul.
     
    And?

    You are no different from modern progressives whining about slavery to justify various insolences against Europeans. Must be a universal phenomenon.

    Replies: @Wokechoke

  534. @AP
    @Mikhail


    But they outnumbered Russians in 1897 and Russians themselves did not become a majority until World War II

    By a whopping 2% margin of roughly 35% to 33%.
     
    Yes, as I said they outnumbered Russians. And also as I said, Russians weren't a majority until World War II. Everything I said was accurate. Unlike what you said.

    Your other idiotic comments are Soros new history like
     
    Which ones and how?

    I pointed out that Rus only ever had about 1% of Crimea.

    See, that tiny piece:

    https://alchetron.com/cdn/tmutarakan-063f00d5-9d30-40e6-9eef-1afbb49cd57-resize-750.jpeg

    https://alchetron.com/cdn/tmutarakan-d9b18bf1-df1e-497d-960c-0d104d54465-resize-750.png

    The Tatars didn’t predate the Rus Slav presence
     
    The presence that only ever existed on 1% of Crimean territory (see above).

    And although the Tatar came later, the ancestors of the Crimean Tatars (Greeks, Ostrogoths, etc.) were there much earlier.

    https://catedra-unesco.espais.iec.cat/en/2017/03/20/20-the-crimean-tatars-who-they-are-and-where-they-come-from/

    The merging of the Mongols and the Turkic population in the north of the peninsula and of the same Turkic population and the Greeks and Byzantines from the south coast configured the Tatar people of Crimea, who were the main group in the peninsula until the beginning of the twentieth century, long after the Russian annexation of 1783.

    Clearly, the Crimean Tatars are heavily mixed with native non-Asians:

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/34/H%C4%B1d%C4%B1rellez_in_Crimea_11.jpg

    ::::::::::::::::

    So, as I said: "your argument manages to be stupid on two levels: Crimean Tatars are descended from the pre-Tatar invasion inhabitants; and, the medieval Rus didn’t rule 99% of Crimean territory."

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @Mikhail

    The pre-Tatar invasion inhabitants weren’t Tatars. The Rus Slav presence in Crimea predates that of the slave trading Crimean Tatars. You don’t mention the Scythians. The Crimean Tatars haven’t been a majority for quite some time. In more recent instances, they had a plurality. In even more recent instances they’re the clear minority. Crimea has a rock solid well over 2/3 favoring reunification with Russia.

    • Replies: @Beckow
    @Mikhail

    He knows...AP's only way of arguing is to selectively pick a few factoids and to pretend that he doesn't see the context or the world. When he is called on it, he becomes hysterical. I would not bother with him...

    The reality is that Crimea has a massive native Russian majority that wants to live in Russia. That means that either 2 million Russians would be expelled and some murdered (like in Odessa) or they would be militarily occupied and their identity suppressed. Both those methods are criminal and simply can't be done in normal Europe. But we know that EU has lost any sense of proportion and would look the other way.

    That means that Russia has a rather simple choice: watch its people murdered, expelled and deprived of any rights, or go all the way. The same applies to Donbas and a few other Russian areas of Ukraine. The West is forcing this choice. One wonders why? Why wasn't a reasonable compromise like the Minsk deal adopted? Unfortunately the answer is that the West has decided some time ago to destroy or to fatally weaken Russia. The problem is that it can't work and we could all perish while they attempt it. Ukies are just collateral damage, if they don't see it, they are failing the basic Darwin test of evolution...

  535. @Mr. XYZ
    @silviosilver

    Whites are also the hottest race lol. Even in comparison to East Asians. Especially white women. For men, it's less clear-cut lol.

    Replies: @QCIC, @silviosilver

    Maybe “the hottest” is what Jesus meant to say. That would be rather welcome news. Maybe some conspiratard with a historical bent should concoct a link to some Aramaic term for attractiveness. It would do just that little bit to make the future something to once again look forward to, instead of something to dread.

    But I must take issue with this:

    Even in comparison to East Asians.

    What do you mean “even in comparison”, as if there they are somehow close competitors. Rolling eyes.

    Then again the argument from aesthetics is even more useless than the argument from intelligence. Whites themselves dismiss it as mere “supremacism” – of an even more obvious variety – without a second’s thought. And the far white right goes even nuttier with it than it does with intelligence, as recently seen on that trainwreck of a comment thread to Tobias Langdon’s “facial fascist” post.

  536. @Ivashka the fool
    @silviosilver

    The son of the wolf https://g.co/kgs/wzXgwd

    The White Man's Burden https://g.co/kgs/NJs2zD

    Men Without Women https://g.co/kgs/br7L9e

    Storm of Steel https://g.co/kgs/7scBeV


    I could go on...

    Meekest race, really ?

    Replies: @silviosilver

    Meekest race, really ?

    Whites are meekest today. The meek inheriting the earth would apply to those people who are meek at the point in time the earth is to be inherited, rather than to those who’ve been meekest historically, wouldn’t it? Or maybe it applies to anyone who was ever meek. Who knows? Jesus wasn’t one to clearly explain what he meant; or if he ever did, no one considered his explanations worth writing down.

  537. @24th Alabama
    @Ivashka the fool

    I'm still confused about who you are and what
    you are about, but I wish you well.

    Replies: @Another Polish Perspective, @Dmitry

    Ivashka the fool/bashibuzuk is giving you authentic taste of the Soviet person and the Soviet bohemian Moscow peoples’ culture. It is an authentic taste of a lost world of the underground Moscow hipsters in around 1986. His posts smell of “the perestroika”, but it has now some bitter smell after the unhappy events of the later decades.

    As for Putin, he is very popular for American rightwing people. We even have AP in this thread as the example of American rightwing person who still cannot be separated from Putin’s marketing, even after Putin attacked his favorite country.

    In the performance review, Putin had one job, which is not to crash the postsoviet plane. Imagine you are in a plane. Your pilot has one job. He doesn’t have to win a competition in the airshow. He can drink champagne and cheat his company expensive, I don’t care. He just has to fly the plane and not crash our lives in the ground.

    After February 2022, I’m pretty sure he is crashing the plane in the ground. Plane is burning, tail is bent. Air hostess is trying to enter the cabin to fly the plane. Most of us with parachutes have been jumping out of the plane etc.

    • LOL: Yahya
    • Replies: @Greasy William
    @Dmitry

    What are the chances of a nationalist coup? Someone with similar ideology to Strelkov?

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @LondonBob

  538. @Mr. XYZ
    @Anatoly Karlin


    It was justifiable by the standards of the time since it was the universal thing to do (including even with the UK in 1916) and it was not the primary aggressor party.
     
    Isn't conscription still justified by contemporary standards since a lot of countries even nowadays still practice it, though? And even some of the ones that don't are a part of a much more powerful military alliance such as NATO which gives them the luxury of avoiding conscription, a luxury that Ukraine unfortunately does not have (not yet, at least).

    The scenario AP posited is one in which China invades Russia after the post-color revolution Russian regime behaves threateningly and provokes it in service of American neocons. In that case, conscription would be immoral and indefensible, and any Russian leader who orders it or agent who helps enforce it on the ground would be a legitimate target for assassination. The correct approach would be to surrender and let the Chinese and Westerners fight it out. It can join the winning side and possibly do some opportunistic territorial grabs and/or ethnic cleansing (though that would not be moral) from the loser parties at the very end. But that is generally the smart, high IQ thing to do. The Czechs overall had a relatively happy 20C.
     
    What if the West won't be interested in coming to Russia's defense, though? It's similar to Ukraine in 2022: Had the Ukrainians refused to fight, the West wouldn't have been coming to their defense. Even giving Ukrainians weapons to fight an anti-Russian insurgency is contingent on Ukrainians actually being willing to fight.

    As for the Czechs, had Hitler not made any moves on Poland (or Danzig, which would have likely still triggered a Polish war), Germany might have remained in control of Czechia up to the present-day, in which case the Czechs might have to endure cultural genocide (similar to pre-WWI Germany with Poles, or perhaps harsher depending on just how long Nazism will remain viable as a political movement in Germany without WWII) and attempts to encourage them to emigrate en masse and/or to Germanize them (for the "racially fit" elements among them, in Nazi eyes). That would have been far from an ideal 20th century for them: Having their statehood be destroyed, possibly permanently, and ending up like the Sorbs in the long-run. They'd have avoided Communism, but still, cultural genocide is one hell of a bitch!

    From a Czech perspective, had Hitler not moved onto Poland/Danzig later on, it would have likely been preferable to fight over the Sudetenland in 1938 had the Anglo-French actually been willing to likewise do so. At least Czechoslovak statehood would be likely preserved that way. ("Likely" because theoretically speaking, France can still fall, and if the Nazis get lucky they can subsequently defeat and conquer the Soviet Union, but that's probably not the most likely scenario with a 1938 WWII PoD.)

    BTW, if Russia still has at least nuclear parity with China, if not an outright nuclear advantage over China, then I suspect that Russia will respond to any Chinese attack on Russian territory with nuclear weapons. This is true even for a pro-Western post-Putin Russia. There's a risk of a catastrophic escalation but also a very seriously possibility of China backing down and retreating in response to this.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    Isn’t conscription still justified by contemporary standards since a lot of countries even nowadays still practice it, though? And even some of the ones that don’t are a part of a much more powerful military alliance such as NATO which gives them the luxury of avoiding conscription, a luxury that Ukraine unfortunately does not have (not yet, at least).

    I was a bit wrong here: Most countries nowadays do not practice conscription. However, even in the Western world, there are several exceptions to this rule: Switzerland, Austria, Finland, Greece, Turkey, South Korea, and Taiwan, in addition to Ukraine, of course. There would have probably been more Western exceptions to this rule had it not been for the existence of the super-powerful NATO alliance. The Baltic countries, at the very least, would have had conscription in such a scenario. Maybe Poland, Czechia, Slovakia, Romania, Serbia, and/or Macedonia as well, especially if Germany, Hungary, and/or Bulgaria would have been making noises about regaining their lost territories (again, while the countries mentioned above would not have had the NATO alliance to protect them).

    Ukraine’s current situation is comparable to that of 1939 Poland, were the Anglo-French simply willing to arm Poland but not directly fight for Poland and if Nazi Germany would have only been interested in cultural genocide rather than physical genocide in Poland. In such a scenario, 1939 Poland would have still certainly had conscription.

  539. @Yahya
    @silviosilver


    Well, whites are the meekest race, so maybe there’s hope yet.
     
    John Derbyshire put it best when he said “white people are pussies”.

    This short and elegant sentence explains much of what has been happening recently in the West.

    This behavior seems to be cultural; whites used to be as ruthless as one can be just a few centuries ago.

    But the long prosperity has softened them.

    The Christian morality of “love thy neighbor” and “turn thy cheek” didn't help one bit either.

    Replies: @Greasy William, @Ivashka the fool, @Yevardian, @silviosilver

    John Derbyshire put it best when he said “white people are pussies”.

    More accurately, they are self-abnegating wankers; the timidity flows as a consequence.

  540. @Yevardian
    @Mikel


    Having seen first hand the incompetence of the Russian military and how it translates to massive loss of life at the front, he got fed up and started a feud with the top brass that eventually led him to rebel against them, being on the verge of entering Moscow with his troops. At the last moment, either he found less support in certain ranks than he had expected or he was genuinely convinced that he shouldn’t carry on with an action that was going to cause many deaths and damage to Russia.
     
    I agree with general gist of your whole post, except I think this interpretation somewhat discounts the fact that Prigozhin and Shoigu have hated each other for many years now, and it's anyone's guess how and when their feud started.
    As far as I recall (Ivashka/Bashibuzuk can fill in missing details or mistakes) Shoigu's real career began with Yeltsin's shelling of the White House in 1993 (the real deathdate of Russian democray, as anyone knows, and the event that convinced my family to decide on emigration, after the sabotage of Ter-Petrosyan) and the subsequent repression of any protests. Shoigu's subsequent history shouldn't inspire anyone he was promoted for military competence.

    Prigozhin's claims of a deliberate missile attack on Wagner from the MOD seem to be a justifying exaggeration, but there's no doubt that Shoigu and others in the army were actively trying to marginalise Wagner's role, eventually escalating to small-scale sabotage, with the eventual goal of having Prigozhin removed from his position for months.

    Putin seems so AWOL from the day-to-day military developments of the SMO that I think the inter-service rivalry finally got completely out of hand, and Prigozhin impetuously tried this desperate mutinous action with hopes of retaining his position (and by extension, likely his life), or at least obtaining for himself some sort of exit.
    Certainly I don't think a march all the way to Moscow was planned beforehand, but with the slowness of any official decisive reaction, events took their own course.

    Replies: @Dmitry, @Mikel

    The most important information about Shoigu, is his family owns the “Ninja Warrior” franchise in Russia, Lavrov’s family only owns KFC and similar things, Prigozhin owned a private army.

    It was only 4 years ago, I had still a bit of the reverse culture shock when I revisited for vacation a city in Russia after being in Europe, the largest advertisements in one of the main street billboards were advertising for a chain of brothels in the city. I was laughing about how the Europeans would view this culture. Brothels have some of the best advertising position of the businesses in the city’s centre.

    This year, some of those same billboards, probably now adverts for “Wagner group” saying like join the winning team (“Вступай в команду победителей”). There was our “spiritual evolution”.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @Dmitry

    Which Russian city did you visit for vacation?

    Replies: @QCIC

  541. @Dmitry
    @24th Alabama

    Ivashka the fool/bashibuzuk is giving you authentic taste of the Soviet person and the Soviet bohemian Moscow peoples' culture. It is an authentic taste of a lost world of the underground Moscow hipsters in around 1986. His posts smell of "the perestroika", but it has now some bitter smell after the unhappy events of the later decades.

    As for Putin, he is very popular for American rightwing people. We even have AP in this thread as the example of American rightwing person who still cannot be separated from Putin's marketing, even after Putin attacked his favorite country.

    In the performance review, Putin had one job, which is not to crash the postsoviet plane. Imagine you are in a plane. Your pilot has one job. He doesn't have to win a competition in the airshow. He can drink champagne and cheat his company expensive, I don't care. He just has to fly the plane and not crash our lives in the ground.

    After February 2022, I'm pretty sure he is crashing the plane in the ground. Plane is burning, tail is bent. Air hostess is trying to enter the cabin to fly the plane. Most of us with parachutes have been jumping out of the plane etc.

    Replies: @Greasy William

    What are the chances of a nationalist coup? Someone with similar ideology to Strelkov?

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @Greasy William

    Low after Putin's recent crackdown, I would suspect? In such a scenario, ironically, it might actually be in the West's interests to help Putin since a Strelkov-type leader for Russia might be both more competent than Putin and as aggressive as Putin, which is a bad combo.

    Strelkov-types are too smart for aggressive Russian nationalists from a cynical Western point of view. Thus, they can't be allowed to get anywhere near power in Russia. Though non-aggressive Russian nationalists would probably be much more tolerated by the West.

    , @LondonBob
    @Greasy William

    The chances of any coup is zero, that should be clear enough now.

    The Wagner Coup Show worked so well because it preyed on every Western fantasy of there being such a coup.

    Larry Johnson speculating that the Western intelligence had fully bought in to such a fantasy.

    https://sonar21.com/was-prigozhins-mutiny-a-western-intelligence-op-derailed-by-russias-spies/

    Maybe, maybe not. I note the Chinese commentary is calling it a reality show. Still not seen any real evidence if helicopters and a plane being shot down, videos are easy enough to repackage and fake, still not every actor would have been aware they were just playing a part.

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard

  542. @Greasy William
    @Dmitry

    What are the chances of a nationalist coup? Someone with similar ideology to Strelkov?

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @LondonBob

    Low after Putin’s recent crackdown, I would suspect? In such a scenario, ironically, it might actually be in the West’s interests to help Putin since a Strelkov-type leader for Russia might be both more competent than Putin and as aggressive as Putin, which is a bad combo.

    Strelkov-types are too smart for aggressive Russian nationalists from a cynical Western point of view. Thus, they can’t be allowed to get anywhere near power in Russia. Though non-aggressive Russian nationalists would probably be much more tolerated by the West.

  543. : Is this map accurate? It shows the western part of the Crimean Corridor as being Russian-majority (or at least Russian-plurality, I guess) back in 1875:

  544. @Dmitry
    @Yevardian

    The most important information about Shoigu, is his family owns the "Ninja Warrior" franchise in Russia, Lavrov's family only owns KFC and similar things, Prigozhin owned a private army.

    It was only 4 years ago, I had still a bit of the reverse culture shock when I revisited for vacation a city in Russia after being in Europe, the largest advertisements in one of the main street billboards were advertising for a chain of brothels in the city. I was laughing about how the Europeans would view this culture. Brothels have some of the best advertising position of the businesses in the city's centre.

    This year, some of those same billboards, probably now adverts for "Wagner group" saying like join the winning team ("Вступай в команду победителей"). There was our "spiritual evolution".

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    Which Russian city did you visit for vacation?

    • Replies: @QCIC
    @Mr. XYZ

    What do married Russian women think about these brothels and their signs?

    Do the prostitutes in Russia have legal protections as in some European countries or is this just standard human bondage and trafficking with modern advertising?

    In the USA it is not uncommon to see large billboards for "exotic dancing" places (strip clubs). I think these places inevitably connect with prostitution in addition to the dancing.

    Replies: @Dmitry

  545. Includes the input from a Murmansk senator –

    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @Mikhail

    How come you don't have a syndicated "Mike Averko" show? I'd probably watch an episode or two, that's certainly more views than you're getting on your blogsite today.

    Replies: @Mikhail

  546. @Greasy William
    @Dmitry

    What are the chances of a nationalist coup? Someone with similar ideology to Strelkov?

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @LondonBob

    The chances of any coup is zero, that should be clear enough now.

    The Wagner Coup Show worked so well because it preyed on every Western fantasy of there being such a coup.

    Larry Johnson speculating that the Western intelligence had fully bought in to such a fantasy.

    https://sonar21.com/was-prigozhins-mutiny-a-western-intelligence-op-derailed-by-russias-spies/

    Maybe, maybe not. I note the Chinese commentary is calling it a reality show. Still not seen any real evidence if helicopters and a plane being shot down, videos are easy enough to repackage and fake, still not every actor would have been aware they were just playing a part.

    • Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
    @LondonBob


    I note the Chinese commentary is calling it a reality show.
     
    Not just them. I have seen more than one take that this was a publicity promo for the new Wagner Group reality show podcast. Competition for Joe Rogan. Do they have a mix martial arts league? Can they get Khabib?

    https://cdn.siasat.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/ElIbOt4XUAAQw5J.jpg
  547. @Yahya
    @Greasy William


    Arab Christians are definitely not meek. They are much tougher than the Muslims
     
    I am aware. Arab Christians are operating under an Arab-Islamic cultural framework that makes it inappropriate to use them as basis for comparison though.

    Christianity isn’t the sole variable, but I can’t imagine getting drilled with “love”, “forgiveness” and “charity” for a millennium can do anything but soften a people. OTOH, it is only when coupled with contingent factors that Christianity takes its toll on a person’s manhood. It was hard for Christians to be forgiving and charitable back when they couldn’t put food on their own tables. But ease and comfort brought Christian values to the fore. Ironically, today’s West is a more accurate reflection of Christian teachings than the Medieval West, when Christians were out raping and pillaging and genociding and all that other stuff Christians shouldn’t do.

    Replies: @Coconuts

    Christianity isn’t the sole variable, but I can’t imagine getting drilled with “love”, “forgiveness” and “charity” for a millennium can do anything but soften a people.

    Does this track closely with what is observable? Christian Europe could still turn in the 1914-18 and 1939-45 performances after a millennia and a half of this softening. They had better and more dependable food supplies than before then.

    But ease and comfort brought Christian values to the fore.

    There is the issue that in Western Europe (don’t know about the US) the number of people who even identify as Christian is always shrinking and the Christians are usually in the older age groups, general rule is that the older the age group the more of them there are.

    Christian values around sexual morality seem mostly to be gone (the arguments that sexual morality in the West is now closer to later pagan era Roman Empire seem pretty strong) and the radical charity and asceticism, spiritual activity like prayer and worship are increasingly no longer observable either.

    This is possibly because, starting with guys like Hegel and Rousseau, a new conception of ‘authentic (secular) Christianity’ was created:

    The history of the Christian World is therefore the history of the progressive realisation of this ideal state where man will be finally ‘satisfied’ by realising his individuality – a synthesis of the Universal and the Particular, the Slave and the Master, of Labour and Struggle. But, in order to realise this state, man must shift his gaze away from the Beyond and fix it on the here below and act uniquely in view of what is here below. In other words, it is necessary to eliminate the Christian idea of transcendence. This is why the evolution of the Christian world has a double sense: one the one had there is real evolution, which prepares the social and political conditions for the advent of the ‘absolute’ State, on the other an ideal evolution which eliminates the ideal of transcendence, which brings Heaven to Earth as Hegel puts it.

    From Kojeve, …Lecture de Hegel.

    It will probably be why the idea that authentic Christianity is being able to say the Nicean Creed at the same time as receiving the sacraments from a priest ordained by a bishop with correct apostolic succession sounds weird, even though for most of European history these would be the main criteria.

    • Agree: Ivashka the fool
  548. @Yevardian
    @Yahya


    The Christian morality of “love thy neighbor” and “turn thy cheek” didn’t help one bit either.
     
    I'll take that of Islam's promotion of extreme clannishness, fatalism and incestuous-marriages.
    Over the long-term and certainly into the Christian era, Europe has historically always been by far the bloodiest continent even relative to the Middle-East, the past 70 years are an abberation.

    John Derbyshire came out as a white nationalist of a rather virulent variety (certainly he lacks Jared Taylor's graceful manners) whilst being married to an Asian wife with mixed children, definitely something a little off about him.

    Replies: @Coconuts

    John Derbyshire came out as a white nationalist of a rather virulent variety (certainly he lacks Jared Taylor’s graceful manners) whilst being married to an Asian wife with mixed children, definitely something a little off about him.

    May be due to the influence of his wife. Two of the bigger British ethnonat Youtube channels around 2019-20 were run by guys living in East Asia with East Asian wives/girlfriends.

    I know my wife indirectly got me more interested in ethnonationalist topics than I had been before and she is a Belarusian liberal, it was just via exposure to a more nationalistic culture from outside the West.

  549. It looks like Prigozhin is Jewish, a sort of at least as he had just a Jewish father (but could convert too).

    https://www.ynetnews.com/article/rjgqsvndn

    I tell you guys, I do not know how, but “powerful neo-pagan cult bend on world-domination” aka Chabad has its fingers in all that charade or maybe rochade (to use chess termin – Prigozhin was moved to Belarus in effect haha). Prigozhin is 62 years old which is another number from Daniel’s 70 weeks prophecy…. very strange but fitting in terms of prophecy, he is 62 and Putin is 70. Let’s look whether something happens in 8 weeks then as well. Or maybe it is just Chabad’s joke 😉

    • Replies: @sudden death
    @Another Polish Perspective


    Let’s look whether something happens in 8 weeks then as well.
     
    If Prigo really stays in Belarus for longer, may as well start countdown till his march to Minsk and becoming the new dictator instead of Luka and in control of a smaller RF nuclear loot, lol

    https://i.postimg.cc/hv3Xn7SZ/wagnerclown.jpg

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @LondonBob

    , @Wokechoke
    @Another Polish Perspective

    The Jew King of …well he had to try it. Take him outside and dump his body in the Pripet marshes.

    Replies: @Another Polish Perspective

    , @Ivashka the fool
    @Another Polish Perspective


    It looks like Prigozhin is Jewish,
     
    You're probably the last one to notice that. And he's a halachic Jew, not a convert, at least as long as I know. An interesting detail, he entered the high level restaurant business with the help of a British partner who still lives in St. Petersburg. Before that he was an ex-convict hot dog seller. In Soviet times, he went to prison for proxenetism involving minors and burglary, was involved in mafia controlled gambling in the early nineties. Dmitry Zapol'skyi who knew him well in the "Bandits' Petersburg" era has written about him being known as Zhenechka the pedophile.

    https://focus.ua/world/545883-kak-prigozhin-iz-ulichnogo-grabitelya-stal-odnim-iz-samyh-vliyatelnyh-lyudey-v-rf-rassledovanie

    A typical background and career.

    BTW, the guy wearing a baseball cap on the picture is possibly Utkin.

    Replies: @Sean, @AP

  550. @Mr. XYZ
    @Anatoly Karlin

    BTW, what are your thoughts on having a pro-Western post-Putin Russia join the EU in order to achieve greater economies of scale, at least if doing this can be done without severely pissing off China? Russia within the EU would get to be a part of a 600-million-strong confederation, 700-million-strong if Turkey will also eventually join it.

    The EU might pale in comparison to the US and China, but it's still more impressive than India and the rest of the world. 500+ million mostly high-quality people is nothing to scoff at! And they still do a lot of R & D spending, elite science production, et cetera, mostly in its western half.

    And what do you think about Garett Jones's argument that natalism would still be relevant even in the AI age because just like smarter people are capable of using search engines more effectively (through better keywords/search phrases), smarter people are also going to be capable of using AI more effectively (through better questions for the AI)? I suspect that he has a point. Give a smart and a dull person a search engine and the smart person will likely be capable of utilizing it more effectively for research relative to a duller person. There's still likely to be some premium for greater intelligence/brainpower/creativity here. FWIW, I support natalism for the entire Western world, not just for Russia, though I do think that Russia needs it more badly than much of the rest of the West due to Russia's current underpopulation.

    BTW, I find it interesting that Germanic (and Germanic-influenced, such as Ireland) countries are the world's most attractive ones for skilled workers:

    https://www.oecd.org/migration/talent-attractiveness/

    Probably because they're so competently run and there's a lot of achievement there in terms of R & D spending, elite science production, et cetera.

    Replies: @Anatoly Karlin

    BTW, what are your thoughts on having a pro-Western post-Putin Russia join the EU in order to achieve greater economies of scale…

    I would support Russia joining the EU. However, Europe politically reduced to a geographic concept is Eurocentric, exclusionist, and practically racist. As with the US, I would campaign to open up membership to the Middle East, Africa, and beyond (ofc contingent on them adopting democracy, secular liberalism, feminism, LGBT rights, and so forth). While even the EU is historically regressive, to the extent that its expansion undermines the cohesion of the traditional nation-state and moves the world closer to the economies of scale it would enjoy with universal Open Borders, I support it.

    And what do you think about Garett Jones’s argument that natalism would still be relevant even in the AI age

    It depends on timelines. Quick AI timelines make it utterly irrelevant. The main focus should be loosening regulations in order to accelerate genomic intelligence augmentation.

    • LOL: Sher Singh
    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @Anatoly Karlin


    I would support Russia joining the EU. However, Europe politically reduced to a geographic concept is Eurocentric, exclusionist, and practically racist. As with the US, I would campaign to open up membership to the Middle East, Africa, and beyond (ofc contingent on them adopting democracy, secular liberalism, feminism, LGBT rights, and so forth). While even the EU is historically regressive, to the extent that its expansion undermines the cohesion of the traditional nation-state and moves the world closer to the economies of scale it would enjoy with universal Open Borders, I support it.
     
    If one wants greater economies of scale, why not support pro-natalism as well? That also produces larger economies of scale. And possibly of better quality than with open borders. If you're saying that AI makes natalism irrelevant, then why exactly does it not make immigration irrelevant as well? Mass-producing super-smart AI strikes me as a much better way of achieving greater economies of scale than importing non-culturally-compatible working-class Third Worlders, don't you think? It won't turn much of the West into a dump, after all. (Advocating turning the West into a dump while not intending to subsequently stay in the West to deal with the results of the mess that you helped create strikes me as being awfully disgraceful.)

    If AI will also produce a cure to aging, then this will also eventually reach the Third World, in which case Third Worlders would have the luxury of waiting until their countries become rich rather than seeking to immigrate to the First World en masse. And sufficiently smart AI can make even the Third World rich very quickly, no? It would produce an extremely massive smart fraction gain even for those countries, no? (Since the West and/or East Asia will eventually bring its AI over to the Third World as well, right?)

    BTW, having Third World countries embrace Western values and Western concepts and norms is going to be quite a challenge. Turkey is pretty secular by Muslim standards and yet it is still very far from getting EU membership. Latin America embraces a lot of Western values but is unfortunately notoriously homicidal--so, not ready for EU membership even if offered. And the rest of the Third World is much less culturally compatible with the EU at this point in time, other than perhaps their cognitive elites.

    It depends on timelines. Quick AI timelines make it utterly irrelevant. The main focus should be loosening regulations in order to accelerate genomic intelligence augmentation.
     
    Wouldn't quick AI timelines make genomic intelligence augmentation "utterly irrelevant" as well? After all, why upgrade humans when you already have super-smart AI doing all of the difficult thinking and analyzing for humans?

    BTW, do you acknowledge that Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine was a huge mistake since it denied tens/hundreds of thousands of people the chance to get access to anti-aging technology by getting killed prematurely* and also due to the fact that quick AI timelines would make any Russian gains from a conquest of Ukraine quite irrelevant since there's no way in Hell that a couple dozen million average 95 IQ Eastern Slavs are going to be able to compete with super-smart AI in the long-run (and since Russia is not a world leader in AI in any case)? Russia would have been much better off not getting involved in Ukraine in 2022, or even in 2014, for that matter, and instead maintained its good ties with the West (and with China as well), gotten easy access to super-smart AI, and then re-programmed this AI to identify as Ukrainians and to be loyal to Russia. Seems more prudent and more effective, no? Seriously. The IQ of super-smart AI is going to be much higher than 95 or 110 or even 160, after all.

    *And I don't think that you can really blame the West for aiding Ukraine and thus prolonging the war unless you also want to blame Russia for aiding Serbia in 1914 and thus making WWI much, much bloodier than it would have otherwise been since Russia transformed a local Austro-Serbian war into a World War. If Serbs in 1914 were actually interested in saving their own people's lives to the maximum extent/degree possible, then they should have *unconditionally* accepted Austria-Hungary's ultimatum *in its entirety* (however unfair and unjust they might have considered it to be) and also quickly surrendered to Austria-Hungary if Austria-Hungary would have subsequently invaded Serbia anyway.

    BTW, off-topic, but in regards to a one-world government, even one noted supporter of open borders (Ilya Somin) has pointed out that a one-world government can result in a global tyranny with no exit options:

    https://fee.org/articles/a-cosmopolitan-case-against-world-government/

    He, of course, supports government in general being as small as possible due to him being a libertarian.

    Ultimately, though, the biggest criticism of open borders, and the most effective one, is that the effects of open borders cannot be reversed short of mass expulsions/ethnic cleansing or worse. This is similar to what @HeTows on Twitter told me about Israeli Jews: Most of them prefer neither, but if forced to choose, they would prefer religious Jewish fascists over a one-state solution because the odds of religious Jewish fascists and/or their descendants eventually secularizing are much higher than the odds of Arabs converting en masse to Judaism after replacing Jews as the majority ethnic group in Israel. Very cynical but true.

    Replies: @Anatoly Karlin

    , @Mr. XYZ
    @Anatoly Karlin

    BTW, does it strike you that for all of the things that Russians hate the US for, these things are mostly superficial other than the fact that the US entered WWI (late in the game, enough to decisively shift the war against the Germans) but didn't subsequently help the Russians overthrow the Bolsheviks? I can understand the other Entente Powers not doing anything because they were very war-weary, but the US was much less so (in terms of its total losses) and thus was theoretically more capable of intervening, along with of course Japan (though Japan wasn't involved in the European fighting in WWI, unlike the US).

    I guess that Russians could also hate the US for the lack of Marshall Plan aid to their country in the 1990s, but there could have potentially been quite a credible fear that this aid was going to get extensively looted without adequate safeguards and Western supervision of this aid (similar to post-war Ukrainian reconstruction aid from the West right now, actually). That, and the fear that Russia was eventually going to become hostile towards the West again anyway, which actually did turn out to be the case because the West and Russia had competing claims over spheres of influence in Ukraine and the West, as the stronger party, had no inclination to cede Ukraine to Russia (and why exactly should it have, when it makes sense for Ukraine to associate and eventually be a part of the more successful West relative to the less successful Russia?).

  551. @Another Polish Perspective
    It looks like Prigozhin is Jewish, a sort of at least as he had just a Jewish father (but could convert too).

    https://www.ynetnews.com/article/rjgqsvndn


    I tell you guys, I do not know how, but "powerful neo-pagan cult bend on world-domination" aka Chabad has its fingers in all that charade or maybe rochade (to use chess termin - Prigozhin was moved to Belarus in effect haha). Prigozhin is 62 years old which is another number from Daniel's 70 weeks prophecy.... very strange but fitting in terms of prophecy, he is 62 and Putin is 70. Let's look whether something happens in 8 weeks then as well. Or maybe it is just Chabad's joke ;)

    Replies: @sudden death, @Wokechoke, @Ivashka the fool

    Let’s look whether something happens in 8 weeks then as well.

    If Prigo really stays in Belarus for longer, may as well start countdown till his march to Minsk and becoming the new dictator instead of Luka and in control of a smaller RF nuclear loot, lol

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @sudden death

    Prigozhin turned out to be as formidable as the Sausage King of the Ghetto.

    , @LondonBob
    @sudden death

    Wagner being 'punished' by being sent Belarus where they can further secure the leadership there, as well as continue their business in Africa.

    Was wondering what Prigozhin was up to with his rants, we finally know what.

  552. AP says:
    @Wokechoke
    @AP

    The Tartars entered into Crimea as part of the Mongol invasions. They set up shop as Slave Traders for the Ottomans. They literally went on summer raids every year kidnapping Slavic women and boys to be sold in Istanbul.

    You are not doing yourself an favours with the reading audience here.

    The more interesting question is the Tartars based around Kazan and Sarai. They are all in warring on the Kievans.

    Replies: @AP

    The Tartars entered into Crimea as part of the Mongol invasions. They set up shop as Slave Traders for the Ottomans. They literally went on summer raids every year kidnapping Slavic women and boys to be sold in Istanbul.

    And?

    You are no different from modern progressives whining about slavery to justify various insolences against Europeans. Must be a universal phenomenon.

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @AP

    The Russians pushed them into the sea. And good riddance. I think you’ve tipped your hand on your ethnic origins Turk Boy.

    Replies: @songbird

  553. @AP
    @Wokechoke


    The Tartars entered into Crimea as part of the Mongol invasions. They set up shop as Slave Traders for the Ottomans. They literally went on summer raids every year kidnapping Slavic women and boys to be sold in Istanbul.
     
    And?

    You are no different from modern progressives whining about slavery to justify various insolences against Europeans. Must be a universal phenomenon.

    Replies: @Wokechoke

    The Russians pushed them into the sea. And good riddance. I think you’ve tipped your hand on your ethnic origins Turk Boy.

    • LOL: AP
    • Troll: Mr. Hack
    • Replies: @songbird
    @Wokechoke

    It may be that AP is a crypto-Turk who boosts Austria-Hungary and the Intermarium, as a cloak and disguise.

    The dismemberment of the Ottoman Empire would neatly explain his dislike of nationalism.
    https://twitter.com/mmjukic/status/1673386691241951239?s=20

    Replies: @German_reader, @Mr. XYZ, @AP

  554. @Another Polish Perspective
    It looks like Prigozhin is Jewish, a sort of at least as he had just a Jewish father (but could convert too).

    https://www.ynetnews.com/article/rjgqsvndn


    I tell you guys, I do not know how, but "powerful neo-pagan cult bend on world-domination" aka Chabad has its fingers in all that charade or maybe rochade (to use chess termin - Prigozhin was moved to Belarus in effect haha). Prigozhin is 62 years old which is another number from Daniel's 70 weeks prophecy.... very strange but fitting in terms of prophecy, he is 62 and Putin is 70. Let's look whether something happens in 8 weeks then as well. Or maybe it is just Chabad's joke ;)

    Replies: @sudden death, @Wokechoke, @Ivashka the fool

    The Jew King of …well he had to try it. Take him outside and dump his body in the Pripet marshes.

    • Replies: @Another Polish Perspective
    @Wokechoke

    A paedophile cannot be Messiah. Even Chabad knows this.

    Replies: @Wokechoke

  555. @sudden death
    @Another Polish Perspective


    Let’s look whether something happens in 8 weeks then as well.
     
    If Prigo really stays in Belarus for longer, may as well start countdown till his march to Minsk and becoming the new dictator instead of Luka and in control of a smaller RF nuclear loot, lol

    https://i.postimg.cc/hv3Xn7SZ/wagnerclown.jpg

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @LondonBob

    Prigozhin turned out to be as formidable as the Sausage King of the Ghetto.

  556. @Another Polish Perspective
    It looks like Prigozhin is Jewish, a sort of at least as he had just a Jewish father (but could convert too).

    https://www.ynetnews.com/article/rjgqsvndn


    I tell you guys, I do not know how, but "powerful neo-pagan cult bend on world-domination" aka Chabad has its fingers in all that charade or maybe rochade (to use chess termin - Prigozhin was moved to Belarus in effect haha). Prigozhin is 62 years old which is another number from Daniel's 70 weeks prophecy.... very strange but fitting in terms of prophecy, he is 62 and Putin is 70. Let's look whether something happens in 8 weeks then as well. Or maybe it is just Chabad's joke ;)

    Replies: @sudden death, @Wokechoke, @Ivashka the fool

    It looks like Prigozhin is Jewish,

    You’re probably the last one to notice that. And he’s a halachic Jew, not a convert, at least as long as I know. An interesting detail, he entered the high level restaurant business with the help of a British partner who still lives in St. Petersburg. Before that he was an ex-convict hot dog seller. In Soviet times, he went to prison for proxenetism involving minors and burglary, was involved in mafia controlled gambling in the early nineties. Dmitry Zapol’skyi who knew him well in the “Bandits’ Petersburg” era has written about him being known as Zhenechka the pedophile.

    https://focus.ua/world/545883-kak-prigozhin-iz-ulichnogo-grabitelya-stal-odnim-iz-samyh-vliyatelnyh-lyudey-v-rf-rassledovanie

    A typical background and career.

    BTW, the guy wearing a baseball cap on the picture is possibly Utkin.

    • Replies: @Sean
    @Ivashka the fool


    Dmitry Zapol’skyi who knew him well in the “Bandits’ Petersburg” era has written about him being known as Zhenechka the pedophile.
     
    The very same allegation that Alexander Litvinenko was poisoned for making about Putin.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

    , @AP
    @Ivashka the fool


    Dmitry Zapol’skyi who knew him well in the “Bandits’ Petersburg” era has written about him being known as Zhenechka the pedophile

     

    This makes his foray into writing children’s books more sinister.

    https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2023/06/01/wagner-head-prigozhins-past-life-as-a-childrens-author-and-illustrator-a81358

  557. @LondonBob
    @Greasy William

    The chances of any coup is zero, that should be clear enough now.

    The Wagner Coup Show worked so well because it preyed on every Western fantasy of there being such a coup.

    Larry Johnson speculating that the Western intelligence had fully bought in to such a fantasy.

    https://sonar21.com/was-prigozhins-mutiny-a-western-intelligence-op-derailed-by-russias-spies/

    Maybe, maybe not. I note the Chinese commentary is calling it a reality show. Still not seen any real evidence if helicopters and a plane being shot down, videos are easy enough to repackage and fake, still not every actor would have been aware they were just playing a part.

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard

    I note the Chinese commentary is calling it a reality show.

    Not just them. I have seen more than one take that this was a publicity promo for the new Wagner Group reality show podcast. Competition for Joe Rogan. Do they have a mix martial arts league? Can they get Khabib?

  558. @Ivashka the fool
    @Another Polish Perspective


    It looks like Prigozhin is Jewish,
     
    You're probably the last one to notice that. And he's a halachic Jew, not a convert, at least as long as I know. An interesting detail, he entered the high level restaurant business with the help of a British partner who still lives in St. Petersburg. Before that he was an ex-convict hot dog seller. In Soviet times, he went to prison for proxenetism involving minors and burglary, was involved in mafia controlled gambling in the early nineties. Dmitry Zapol'skyi who knew him well in the "Bandits' Petersburg" era has written about him being known as Zhenechka the pedophile.

    https://focus.ua/world/545883-kak-prigozhin-iz-ulichnogo-grabitelya-stal-odnim-iz-samyh-vliyatelnyh-lyudey-v-rf-rassledovanie

    A typical background and career.

    BTW, the guy wearing a baseball cap on the picture is possibly Utkin.

    Replies: @Sean, @AP

    Dmitry Zapol’skyi who knew him well in the “Bandits’ Petersburg” era has written about him being known as Zhenechka the pedophile.

    The very same allegation that Alexander Litvinenko was poisoned for making about Putin.

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @Sean

    Zapol'skyi died in Riga in 2021 from a heart attack. He had a lot of dirt on RF elites. He knew Putin in the very beginning if his Saint-Petersburg's carrier, when Putin was the luggage carrying man for Sobchak the father. Putin's was nicknamed the moth" (моль) back then. I remember Piter in these years, reading the book written by Zapol'skyi, entitled "Putinburg", and his articles in Sputnik & Pogrom made me feel nostalgic.

    Replies: @Sean

  559. @A123
    @QCIC

    ROTFLMAO

    Why did you parrot my use of the term *strawman "? That says much about you. Are you as mentally ill as Mr. hack?
    ____

    Your intentional misrepresentation was for the purposes of strawmanning. A broad sweep at everyone. Keep your mind on a swivel.

    • Share your source that “100% of all Proud Boys members are Feds”.
    • Or retract and apologize.

    There is no shame in a retraction if your mistake was accidental.

    Trying to accuse me of your own anti-Semitic transgressions is both laughable and very Pallywood.

    PEACE 😇

     
    https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-_urdfNnOw5M/TfRxQACTRJI/AAAAAAAAAFc/LuPlWjXvxP0/s1600/1307865286832.jpg

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

    There he goes again, playing a home schooled psychiatrist. kremlinstoogeA123 claims that he’s put me on “ignore” (does anybody really believe that he has, meaning that he’s a pathological liar?) over a year ago, and yet he still can’t get me out of his mind.


    Poor kreminstoogeA123, just can’t quit thinking about me. 🙁

  560. @Mikhail
    Includes the input from a Murmansk senator -


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ICGHmDxU_3w

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

    How come you don’t have a syndicated “Mike Averko” show? I’d probably watch an episode or two, that’s certainly more views than you’re getting on your blogsite today.

    • Replies: @Mikhail
    @Mr. Hack

    I get a lot of private feedback. Some recent samples -

    Pride goes before destruction, and a
    haughty spirit before a fall.
    Proverbs 16:18


    &

    Russia can bomb a children's hospital & Averko will proclaim "Putin cures child of cancer!"

    My replies -

    The irony of projection.

    Among others, US and Israel have done such with ******* either being non-committal or highlighting that the armed adversary used such an area as a human shield.

    ****

    Of possible interest:

    https://twitter.com/MatreshkaRF/status/1673708889626345477

    Is it a fake?

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @sudden death, @QCIC

  561. @Ivashka the fool
    @Another Polish Perspective


    It looks like Prigozhin is Jewish,
     
    You're probably the last one to notice that. And he's a halachic Jew, not a convert, at least as long as I know. An interesting detail, he entered the high level restaurant business with the help of a British partner who still lives in St. Petersburg. Before that he was an ex-convict hot dog seller. In Soviet times, he went to prison for proxenetism involving minors and burglary, was involved in mafia controlled gambling in the early nineties. Dmitry Zapol'skyi who knew him well in the "Bandits' Petersburg" era has written about him being known as Zhenechka the pedophile.

    https://focus.ua/world/545883-kak-prigozhin-iz-ulichnogo-grabitelya-stal-odnim-iz-samyh-vliyatelnyh-lyudey-v-rf-rassledovanie

    A typical background and career.

    BTW, the guy wearing a baseball cap on the picture is possibly Utkin.

    Replies: @Sean, @AP

    Dmitry Zapol’skyi who knew him well in the “Bandits’ Petersburg” era has written about him being known as Zhenechka the pedophile

    This makes his foray into writing children’s books more sinister.

    https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2023/06/01/wagner-head-prigozhins-past-life-as-a-childrens-author-and-illustrator-a81358

    • Agree: QCIC
  562. @Mr. XYZ
    @Dmitry

    Which Russian city did you visit for vacation?

    Replies: @QCIC

    What do married Russian women think about these brothels and their signs?

    Do the prostitutes in Russia have legal protections as in some European countries or is this just standard human bondage and trafficking with modern advertising?

    In the USA it is not uncommon to see large billboards for “exotic dancing” places (strip clubs). I think these places inevitably connect with prostitution in addition to the dancing.

    • Replies: @Dmitry
    @QCIC

    In the reality of practical life, Russia is more socially/sexually liberal than many Western countries, so people are not going to protest against the brothels, accept this is a normal part of life, perhaps not liking the billboards however because of the negative image to the city. Even I saw, local media in the recent years in Russia is promoting prostitution as a good job for women, with high salary.

    But the rules of speech are a bit different. For example, in the Soviet culture they had kind of Victorian ideas about what they allow in mass culture. Even in the 19th century Russian empire like this, with the concept to read sexual literature only in French language, while Russian literature would have rules so it avoids sex. When old people complain in Russia, it's usually related to what is allowed in media, instead of what is allowed in real life.

    If you read the books of a historian who is famous in Russia (Boris Mironov), in traditional Russian village even in 19th century they couldn't impose Christian rules about sexuality, against more liberal traditional views. According to Mironov, this is one of the many reasons why the Church has to invest a large part of its project into the villages in the 19th century, to try to educate the villagers, not attaining success.

    -

    As for why the 21st century Russian government has been so successful to market to rightwing Americans who logically choose a socially conservative country, not socially liberal country? AP in the forum is an example of this. I think it's an interesting dialectic of the Cold War. One of the changes in the school system in Russia in the last decade, they write in the lesson guide the teachers need to promote "family values", which is terms from the 1970s Republican Party.

    It's the normal practice in Russia, where the explicit culture is imported, here they import in the fashions in America and Fox News, while real underlying Russian culture doesn't change under the surface for centuries.

    It's also true, rightwing voters seem to like more "sexually liberated" politicians, with less "family values". The rightwing voters like Trump, Berlusconi, Johnson, also Putin and a lot of the officials.

    Replies: @Another Polish Perspective, @John Johnson, @silviosilver

  563. @Yevardian
    @Mikel


    Having seen first hand the incompetence of the Russian military and how it translates to massive loss of life at the front, he got fed up and started a feud with the top brass that eventually led him to rebel against them, being on the verge of entering Moscow with his troops. At the last moment, either he found less support in certain ranks than he had expected or he was genuinely convinced that he shouldn’t carry on with an action that was going to cause many deaths and damage to Russia.
     
    I agree with general gist of your whole post, except I think this interpretation somewhat discounts the fact that Prigozhin and Shoigu have hated each other for many years now, and it's anyone's guess how and when their feud started.
    As far as I recall (Ivashka/Bashibuzuk can fill in missing details or mistakes) Shoigu's real career began with Yeltsin's shelling of the White House in 1993 (the real deathdate of Russian democray, as anyone knows, and the event that convinced my family to decide on emigration, after the sabotage of Ter-Petrosyan) and the subsequent repression of any protests. Shoigu's subsequent history shouldn't inspire anyone he was promoted for military competence.

    Prigozhin's claims of a deliberate missile attack on Wagner from the MOD seem to be a justifying exaggeration, but there's no doubt that Shoigu and others in the army were actively trying to marginalise Wagner's role, eventually escalating to small-scale sabotage, with the eventual goal of having Prigozhin removed from his position for months.

    Putin seems so AWOL from the day-to-day military developments of the SMO that I think the inter-service rivalry finally got completely out of hand, and Prigozhin impetuously tried this desperate mutinous action with hopes of retaining his position (and by extension, likely his life), or at least obtaining for himself some sort of exit.
    Certainly I don't think a march all the way to Moscow was planned beforehand, but with the slowness of any official decisive reaction, events took their own course.

    Replies: @Dmitry, @Mikel

    this interpretation somewhat discounts the fact that Prigozhin and Shoigu have hated each other for many years now

    I guess there are many little details most of us don’t know about but my point is that they don’t matter too much. What matters is that something had to give at some point and it just did.

    Putin and his generals launched a catastrophically designed military adventure that has turned into a senseless carnage of thousands of Russians and civilians with no end in sight. When you do something like that you’re very lucky to remain in power for long and Russia is not even a full dictatorship. There’s lots of freedom of expression and the younger generations have as much access to information as anyone in the West. Just look like at AK, posting against the regime from Moscow on a US-based platform.

    If anything, Putin’s survival of Prigozhin’s SMO proves the still remarkable stability of his regime. But this isn’t over. On the margins, Putin and Shoigu have already managed to turn a former alt-right, Trump-supporting blogger like AK into a sexually confused defender of open borders. As the tragedy continues to unfold, more mainstream sectors of the Russian society, including discontent cadres of the regime, will also defect. Ordinary people showing their support to the ex-convict in Rostov and the regular army refusing to fight him on his way to Moscow can only be a harbinger of things to come.

    • Replies: @German_reader
    @Mikel


    As the tragedy continues to unfold, more mainstream sectors of the Russian society, including discontent cadres of the regime, will also defect.
     
    Defect to what exactly?
    Given Ukraine's officially stated goals and the way pro-Ukrainian Westerners talk (with all their fantasies about dismemberment of RF, also lots of joy at the prospect of civil war in Russia on display on Saturday, including among "experts") you'd have to be braindead to believe that the West would be magnanimous even in the very unlikely event some liberal figure comes to power in Russia and stops the war. Earlier this month oppositionist medium Meduza published some letters from readers (so presumably people not all that supportive of Putin's regime) who had misgivings about the war, but argued that now the only way was through and Russia couldn't afford to lose:
    https://meduza.io/en/feature/2023/06/03/the-only-thing-worse-than-war-is-losing-one
    And tbh I think they're right.
    AK isn't representative of anything more than his own personal pathologies.

    Replies: @Mikel

  564. German_reader says:
    @Mikel
    @Yevardian


    this interpretation somewhat discounts the fact that Prigozhin and Shoigu have hated each other for many years now
     
    I guess there are many little details most of us don't know about but my point is that they don't matter too much. What matters is that something had to give at some point and it just did.

    Putin and his generals launched a catastrophically designed military adventure that has turned into a senseless carnage of thousands of Russians and civilians with no end in sight. When you do something like that you're very lucky to remain in power for long and Russia is not even a full dictatorship. There's lots of freedom of expression and the younger generations have as much access to information as anyone in the West. Just look like at AK, posting against the regime from Moscow on a US-based platform.

    If anything, Putin's survival of Prigozhin's SMO proves the still remarkable stability of his regime. But this isn't over. On the margins, Putin and Shoigu have already managed to turn a former alt-right, Trump-supporting blogger like AK into a sexually confused defender of open borders. As the tragedy continues to unfold, more mainstream sectors of the Russian society, including discontent cadres of the regime, will also defect. Ordinary people showing their support to the ex-convict in Rostov and the regular army refusing to fight him on his way to Moscow can only be a harbinger of things to come.

    Replies: @German_reader

    As the tragedy continues to unfold, more mainstream sectors of the Russian society, including discontent cadres of the regime, will also defect.

    Defect to what exactly?
    Given Ukraine’s officially stated goals and the way pro-Ukrainian Westerners talk (with all their fantasies about dismemberment of RF, also lots of joy at the prospect of civil war in Russia on display on Saturday, including among “experts”) you’d have to be braindead to believe that the West would be magnanimous even in the very unlikely event some liberal figure comes to power in Russia and stops the war. Earlier this month oppositionist medium Meduza published some letters from readers (so presumably people not all that supportive of Putin’s regime) who had misgivings about the war, but argued that now the only way was through and Russia couldn’t afford to lose:
    https://meduza.io/en/feature/2023/06/03/the-only-thing-worse-than-war-is-losing-one
    And tbh I think they’re right.
    AK isn’t representative of anything more than his own personal pathologies.

    • Replies: @Mikel
    @German_reader


    now the only way was through and Russia couldn’t afford to lose
     
    But Russia is going to lose with the Shoigu clan in charge. Or at best be forced to an unstable stalemate. A year and a half later half of Donetsk oblast is still controlled by the Ukrainians, including the outskirts of the capital, Russia was forced to retreat from the only regional capital it had occupied shortly after it was pronounced a part of Russia, the attack on Kharkiv and the march on Odessa were convincingly repulsed by the Ukrainian defenders before they had even received much help from the West and the pincer attack on Kiev turned into a cemetery of Russian armor and soldiers. It had to be cancelled. Time is not on Russia's side either. They may improve some aspects of their strategy but they are no match, industrially or technologically, against a West committed to supporting Ukraine. And what are those Russian patriots who don't want to face a defeat going to do when they do see their country defeated?

    Replies: @German_reader, @LondonBob, @Sean, @Wokechoke

  565. @German_reader
    @Mikel


    As the tragedy continues to unfold, more mainstream sectors of the Russian society, including discontent cadres of the regime, will also defect.
     
    Defect to what exactly?
    Given Ukraine's officially stated goals and the way pro-Ukrainian Westerners talk (with all their fantasies about dismemberment of RF, also lots of joy at the prospect of civil war in Russia on display on Saturday, including among "experts") you'd have to be braindead to believe that the West would be magnanimous even in the very unlikely event some liberal figure comes to power in Russia and stops the war. Earlier this month oppositionist medium Meduza published some letters from readers (so presumably people not all that supportive of Putin's regime) who had misgivings about the war, but argued that now the only way was through and Russia couldn't afford to lose:
    https://meduza.io/en/feature/2023/06/03/the-only-thing-worse-than-war-is-losing-one
    And tbh I think they're right.
    AK isn't representative of anything more than his own personal pathologies.

    Replies: @Mikel

    now the only way was through and Russia couldn’t afford to lose

    But Russia is going to lose with the Shoigu clan in charge. Or at best be forced to an unstable stalemate. A year and a half later half of Donetsk oblast is still controlled by the Ukrainians, including the outskirts of the capital, Russia was forced to retreat from the only regional capital it had occupied shortly after it was pronounced a part of Russia, the attack on Kharkiv and the march on Odessa were convincingly repulsed by the Ukrainian defenders before they had even received much help from the West and the pincer attack on Kiev turned into a cemetery of Russian armor and soldiers. It had to be cancelled. Time is not on Russia’s side either. They may improve some aspects of their strategy but they are no match, industrially or technologically, against a West committed to supporting Ukraine. And what are those Russian patriots who don’t want to face a defeat going to do when they do see their country defeated?

    • Replies: @German_reader
    @Mikel


    But Russia is going to lose with the Shoigu clan in charge.
     
    Maybe. But that's an argument for switching to a war economy, mobilization and martial law, including the death penalty against subversive elements. Not for just giving up and trusting in the West's good intentions.

    And what are those Russian patriots who don’t want to face a defeat going to do when they do see their country defeated?
     
    Maybe prepare for the rematch like Germany did after WW1, and draw the appropriate lessons for next time. There already seems to be a lot of criticism after all that Putin is too moderate, too timid etc. And who knows what opportunities the future will hold. We're living in pretty unstable times.
    But of course there's a chance that all of this would go nuclear well before any such developments.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    , @LondonBob
    @Mikel

    An attacking force is supposed to have three to one advantage, not a three to one deficit against a peer force, Russians have shown otherwise.

    Wishful thinking is why NATO thought they would have any more luck with the numbers even now, and the Ukrainians have paid a heavy price for such delusional thinking as the basis of their current offensive.



    https://twitter.com/MNormanDavies/status/1673728129578442753?s=20

    Replies: @LondonBob

    , @Sean
    @Mikel

    I think the explanation for the undersized force was Putin originally intended the build up as a wedge to get Minsk2 (Donbas returned to Ukraine but as an autonomous region with a veto over Ukraine joining Nato) back on track. But


    Radio Free Europe
    Kremlin-Allied Ukrainian Lawmaker Medvedchuk's House Arrest Extended
    Kyiv court has extended the house arrest of Kremlin-friendly tycoon and politician Viktor Medvedchuk, who is being held under suspicion of...
    .10 Jan 2022
     
    Charging Putin's personal friend and point man in Ukraine with treason was something Zelensky obliviously never thought would precipitate what Ukrainian intel had assessed as a sabre rattling build up into a real invasion.

    Time is not on Russia’s side either. They may improve some aspects of their strategy but they are no match, industrially or technologically, against a West committed to supporting Ukraine.

     

    I agree the long term prospects are bad for Russia. The West is going to have arms production lines commissioned soon; they'll need to do that to replenish their own contingency stocks, but the supply to Ukraine can only increase once the factories are producing arms (currently they are not). Russia must decide soon on whether to actually declare a war emergency and build an overwhelming force to batter Ukraine into coming to terms, or start looking for a way out of the conflict that involves a withdrawal. I think the Kremlin is 'Putin' off that decision to see how much better the Russian army in the field can do through improved discipline, organisation and tactics. The Russians are using what they have (eg electronic warfare) much more coordinately now. Possibly the plan is the army in Ukraine is to be battle hardened until it reached peak efficiency and then it will form a cadre for a coming mass influx of reservists that will be used for a big push.
    , @Wokechoke
    @Mikel

    This isn’t all that much different from the Livonia Wars or various border wars between Poland and Russia. Inconclusive and colourful militias with charismatic messiah like False Dimitry etc.

  566. German_reader says:
    @Mikel
    @German_reader


    now the only way was through and Russia couldn’t afford to lose
     
    But Russia is going to lose with the Shoigu clan in charge. Or at best be forced to an unstable stalemate. A year and a half later half of Donetsk oblast is still controlled by the Ukrainians, including the outskirts of the capital, Russia was forced to retreat from the only regional capital it had occupied shortly after it was pronounced a part of Russia, the attack on Kharkiv and the march on Odessa were convincingly repulsed by the Ukrainian defenders before they had even received much help from the West and the pincer attack on Kiev turned into a cemetery of Russian armor and soldiers. It had to be cancelled. Time is not on Russia's side either. They may improve some aspects of their strategy but they are no match, industrially or technologically, against a West committed to supporting Ukraine. And what are those Russian patriots who don't want to face a defeat going to do when they do see their country defeated?

    Replies: @German_reader, @LondonBob, @Sean, @Wokechoke

    But Russia is going to lose with the Shoigu clan in charge.

    Maybe. But that’s an argument for switching to a war economy, mobilization and martial law, including the death penalty against subversive elements. Not for just giving up and trusting in the West’s good intentions.

    And what are those Russian patriots who don’t want to face a defeat going to do when they do see their country defeated?

    Maybe prepare for the rematch like Germany did after WW1, and draw the appropriate lessons for next time. There already seems to be a lot of criticism after all that Putin is too moderate, too timid etc. And who knows what opportunities the future will hold. We’re living in pretty unstable times.
    But of course there’s a chance that all of this would go nuclear well before any such developments.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @German_reader

    Russians would be better off just breeding more, frankly. Ukraine should be admitted into NATO after the end of the current war in order to eliminate the risk of Russia ever trying to do the same thing again at any point in the future.

  567. S says:
    @Greasy William
    @Mikel

    I think that's mostly right. Wagner was going to be dissolved so Prig launched a quasi coup against Shoigu. The purpose of the not coup was not to push out Shoigu, but to allow Wagner to keep its independence.

    But then Putin went on TV and declared Prigozhin to a be a traitor so Prigozhin either needed to make a deal or face certain death. Sensing opportunity, Lukashenko offered Pirgozhin the ability to keep Wagner as an independent force in Belarus. Putin, cautious by nature and not wanting to risk internal bloodshed, agreed to the deal with the intention of going back on it as soon as possible. Already the FSB is talking about prosecuting Prigozhin.

    Russia is Magog, but I no longer think that Putin is Gog. Now I just think he's an idiot. This not coup has brought closer a nationalist takeover of the RF and that guy will be Gog.

    Replies: @Mikel, @S

    Russia is Magog, but I no longer think that Putin is Gog. Now I just think he’s an idiot. This not coup has brought closer a nationalist takeover of the RF and that guy will be Gog.

    This is a sensitive subject, but I’d be curious about your thoughts on these matters:

    A few years ago there was an organization of Christians, Moslems, and Jews (possibly now defunct) whom were concerned about the ‘end time beliefs’ of these spiritual systems potentially coming about in the near term, not due to God, but due to man made self fulfilling prophecies.

    Possibly related, many of the major characters on the present world stage, ie Zelensky, Prigozhin, Jared Kushner, Putin, Biden, Trump, etc, are either wholly (or largely) Jewish, or, are Gentile, but have many Jewish advisers they rely upon to govern.

    In the past there was the 1666 Sabattai Zevi debacle, and a long list (take a number!) of other Jewish false messiah claimants (see two links below), some of these at least also involving complicated dating calculations purportedly derived from Jewish scripture.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sabbateans

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Jewish_messiah_claimants

    As you probably know, anybody seen as a serious contender to be the Jewish messiah in present times, would almost certainly be seen by many Christians as the Anti-christ.

    We shall see.

    I mention the gregarious Jared Kushner here as I have commented upon in the past, that without stretching things, one can find in almost every major historical event of ancient Rome it’s uncanny close parallel in the history of the New Rome, ie the United States.

    Relatedly, the First Triumvirate consisting of ‘Rome’s richest man’, the Roman billionaire and real estate speculator Marcus Crassus, his up and coming political protégé Julius Caesar, and the Roman general Pompey, has it’s close parallel in Donald Trump, his political protege Jared Kushner, and the army veteran Mike Pompeo.

    The First Triumvirate it will be recalled emerged as Rome was transitioning from a republic to a dictatorship. After Crassus’ untimely death, the Triumvirate (and Rome itself) devolved into civil war between it’s two surviving members, Pompey and Caesar. Caesar ultimately prevailed.

    One peculiar thing about Kushner (other than an unpleasant facial grimace he sometimes unconsciously displays) which is remindful of Sabattai Zevi and his 1666 false messiah proclamation, is the insistence Kushner had in purchasing that albatross hugely expensive property at 666 W Fifth Ave.

    Was this an inside joke showing his disdain towards Christian prophecy, or possibly something else? [See Kushner link below]

    https://www.jtrue.com/blog/the-second-coming

    • Replies: @Another Polish Perspective
    @S

    Why shouldn't we live in the End Times? Much points to that conclusion.

    End Times is the Black Swan problem - you face it very very rarely, most people - never, so they think that it can never really happen. Even if it happens pretty often in movies recently - like now there is this "Asteroid City' playing with the idea.

    Conservatives should cherish the idea - above all, it will be the proof that liberals are in union with Satan, and will be justly punished. Frankly, it would be very hard to turn the world around without major catastrophe.

    , @Greasy William
    @S

    I had never heard about the multi faith group trying to avoid the end times.

    Every major failed messiah claimant in history also had huge internal Jewish opposition. Certainly Zevi did. I don't see any messianic type figures out there right now.

    I do agree that it is preferable that people who think like me are kept far away from the levers of power. If I was Israeli PM I would just do everything I could to provoke Russia because I'm convinced a nuclear holocaust is inevitable so we might as well get it over with. I'm glad our leaders are at least trying to avoid that.

    My interpretation of Revelation is that it is a revenge fantasy of an unhinged and drug addled Jewish ultra nationalist. 666 is obviously a reference to Nero. I don't think the book has any prophetic value and I'm certainly not alone: it came very close to not being made part of the canon by the Church Fathers, Luther wanted to remove it (he also wanted to remove James but political reasons made it impossible to remove either) from the Bible and Calvin didn't even bother to write a commentary on it (after writing a commentary on every other book in both the Old Testament and the New).

    Replies: @S, @Greasy William

  568. @Mr. XYZ
    @Gerard1234


    the Nazi demands to Poland were perfectly reasonable
     
    I think that the more important point here is that short of Germany being routed on the battlefield (which actually did eventually occur in real life, at an extraordinarily high cost), Germany was probably unlikely to offer Poland better peace terms even under a post-Nazi German regime (in the event of a successful anti-Nazi coup in Germany). After all, even Weimar Germany deeply resented the Danzig/Polish Corridor situation and did not view it as permanently binding on it.

    Maybe without the benefit of hindsight, the Poles felt that it was best for the Anglo-French to suffer a lot on their behalf while they themselves spend a couple of years under Nazi occupation, but they might have differed on this question had they known just how brutal Nazi occupation was actually going to be for them.

    Replies: @Gerard1234

    Yes.

    Poland’s 2 best allies until March 1939, actually their only true friends……were Nazi Germany and Japan.

    Undoubtedly the Poles were planning for and inciting for a Nazi Germany-Poland-Japan joint-invasion of the USSR. The further into the 1930’s then the less likely of Japan participating in a joint war against the Soviet Union because of our own clashes with Japan in the same period and some good Soviet diplomatic moves after 1935. Poland and Nazi Germany were united in their “principles”, of wanting to destroy the USSR, and the Danzig/Polish corridor situation was easily solveable, but as ever with 2 rats together, the problem wasn’t because of Danzig itself – but on the issue of Polish nujtob imperialism clashing with German liebensraum ambitions over the same territory of Banderastan. War against people of USSR was definite, they were just waiting to finish agreeing trade-0ff on these issues.
    As ever with Polish nutjobs, their schizophrenia of being war-lusting animals AND total cowards/pussys lead them to destruction.

    Polish intelligence services were intensely working throughout the 1930’s to make this war happen – in the Russian Far East and of course its well known they sent masses of their own “civilians” into the western parts of Ukrainian and Belarus SSR to settle. The NKVD worked well but too late as this intelligence work by the Poles in these areas was very useful to the german preparation for Barbarossa.

    Maybe without the benefit of hindsight, the Poles felt that it was best for the Anglo-French to suffer a lot on their behalf

    This is interesting in that Polish scum like pretending to be French, and have traditionally always sucked French d**k, primarily because of France did Poland exist in the interwar period anyway………which makes inexplicable Polish losers not signing a pact against Germany with France – a true stab in the back. Their own imperialistic ambitions, primarily with Belarus , Ukraine, western Russia, Lithuania, their own intense intelligence activity in USSR and their own attempts at Nazi-Poland-Japan joint invasion are the only plausible explanations of why no pact against Nazi’s with France.

    The one thing that appears obvious to me is that a France-Czechoslovakia-Poland pact before 1939 would have stopped WW2, or at worst delayed it. Huge industrial capacity in France and Czecholovakia, exceeding Nazi Germany’s. 3 big armies and populations, exceeding Nazi Germany’s.
    East and west borders of Germany surrounded, some agreement with Britain’s Royal Navy would result in French and Britain Navy’s blockading the north of Germany from the Baltic Sea. A France-Czechoslovakia-USSR deal was achieved , but then of course prevented by Poland.

    So entirely because of Poland, there was no France-Czech-Poland alliance , which if created would have prevented any Nazi war.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @Gerard1234

    Would Polish cooperation have actually made the Anglo-French willing to fight for Czechoslovakia in 1938?

    And had Hitler genuinely been interested in the welfare of the Soviet people instead of merely exploiting them, allying with him would have been a great opportunity for Poland to realize its Promethean vision:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prometheism

    Of course, another way for Poland to save itself would have been an Anglo-Franco-Soviet alliance in 1939. This could have required the Anglo-French to agree to throw the Baltic countries under the Soviet bus, though.

    Replies: @Gerard1234

  569. @Mr. Hack
    @Mikhail

    How come you don't have a syndicated "Mike Averko" show? I'd probably watch an episode or two, that's certainly more views than you're getting on your blogsite today.

    Replies: @Mikhail

    I get a lot of private feedback. Some recent samples –

    Pride goes before destruction, and a
    haughty spirit before a fall.
    Proverbs 16:18

    &

    Russia can bomb a children’s hospital & Averko will proclaim “Putin cures child of cancer!”

    My replies –

    The irony of projection.

    Among others, US and Israel have done such with ******* either being non-committal or highlighting that the armed adversary used such an area as a human shield.

    ****

    Of possible interest:

    https://twitter.com/MatreshkaRF/status/1673708889626345477

    Is it a fake?

    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @Mikhail


    Former Prime minister of #Ukraine, Yatsenyuk, “we killed our own country” pic.twitter.com/rC1mfgJagf

    Is it a fake?
     
    I don't know? Why not ask Wokechoke, our resident expert on Ukrainian and Russian Jewish politicians?

    Replies: @Mikhail

    , @sudden death
    @Mikhail

    Lots of cuts and no reference to the original speech, no such words as "we killed our own country" in the speech, therefore 99,9% probability he was talking about RF political sphere and Zoperational propagandists as usual made a fake without giving the context of uncut speech.

    , @QCIC
    @Mikhail

    "Nazis in Ukraine, shocking I tell you, just shocking!" LOL.

    We know the points about NeoNAZIs in Ukraine are generally valid. Sure Hack and AP can weasel around on the fine details but the overall information is accurate.

    It would be nice to know the provenance of the video, but the propaganda could go either way. Now that wider swaths of people have begun to recognize the NeoNAZI issue as real, the powers that be will use all the tricks in the book to hide any connection with these pariahs.

    Jewish elements will eventually be hunting your NeoNAZI Nationalist buddies and nary a peep will be made by the same folks who previously supported them.

    I wonder if Yats wants to be President of the rump Ukraine?

  570. @Sean
    @AP

    The greatest Ukrainian (Trotsky) won the Russian Civil War by taking hostage the families of Tsarist officers and forcing them to put their skills to work for the Red army. Solzhenitsyn cited the way Lenin and the other family of those who'd plotted to assassinate the Tsar being left alone (apart from having to change their names), showed that the Tsarist regime hadn't the will to totally crush their enemies by liquidating even those innocently associated with subversives.

    Wagner all have to sign contracts with the regular army in July. The mutiny got them much more lucrative terms that they were previously being compelled to agree to. But I think that getting high pay even as members of the regular army is only fair for the non penal Wagnerites who are volunteerist specialised assault infantry required to advance; no matter how adroitly they fight it is going into extreme danger.

    Replies: @Wokechoke

    The Tsar was a softie. He should have annihilated the Jews.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @Wokechoke

    The Jews were Russia's cognitive elite. The goal should have been to aggressively encourage them to intermarry en masse with Slavs, as was the case in the late Soviet era. If anyone should have been exterminated by the Tsar, it was Lenin, Trotsky, and Stalin.

  571. @Mr. XYZ
    @Wokechoke

    Virgin birth is theoretically possible through artificial insemination. It could have existed in a primitive form even 2,000 years ago, with fapping in one's hand and then placing one's sperm-filled hand inside of a vagina lol. But this probably isn't the kind of virgin birth that Christians envision.

    Jesus was mentioned as a historical figure by non-Christian sources as well, so he likely existed. Though I'm still trying to figure out how belief in his alleged Resurrection became so widespread. I mean, the Accession story just strikes me as being so extraordinarily unbelievable (and again, where it Heaven? It's not right above the clouds, so where did Jesus go?), which makes me wonder if the Resurrection story was false as well. Maybe a lot of early Christians simply had visions of Jesus? Similar to how some people have visions of the Virgin Mary? If one can see things that aren't there as a result of one hallucinating, one might be capable of feeling things that aren't there either.

    And even in the modern era, we sometimes have alleged miracles being witnessed by huge numbers of people:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ganesha_drinking_milk_miracle

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miracle_of_the_Sun

    And sometimes people just flat-out behave bizarrely with no rational explanation:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dancing_plague_of_1518

    Replies: @Wokechoke

    The entire point is that his existence is supernatural. It does not need to be rationalized. That’s the freedom in it. A story designed by a Greek observer looking at the weirdo Jews.

  572. See new Tweets
    Conversation
    Arthur Morgan
    @ArthurM40330824
    At what point has #Nazi #Germany cosplay in #Ukraine can be considered to have gone too far? Hummer SUVs with symbols of the times of the Wehrmacht, used by local military commissars to move around #Kyiv.
    How do #Germans feel about this?

    [MORE]

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @Mikhail

    It's quite funny really. Although the use of it is rather bizarre. The iconography of the biggest military losers in the 20th century rehashed as a way to goad Russians.

    , @German_reader
    @Mikhail


    How do #Germans feel about this?
     
    Really bad that we can't do it ourselves anymore (though one can always hope).
    Cultural appropriation isn't ok in any case, my culture isn't your costume!
  573. @Mikhail
    @Mr. Hack

    I get a lot of private feedback. Some recent samples -

    Pride goes before destruction, and a
    haughty spirit before a fall.
    Proverbs 16:18


    &

    Russia can bomb a children's hospital & Averko will proclaim "Putin cures child of cancer!"

    My replies -

    The irony of projection.

    Among others, US and Israel have done such with ******* either being non-committal or highlighting that the armed adversary used such an area as a human shield.

    ****

    Of possible interest:

    https://twitter.com/MatreshkaRF/status/1673708889626345477

    Is it a fake?

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @sudden death, @QCIC

    Former Prime minister of #Ukraine, Yatsenyuk, “we killed our own country” pic.twitter.com/rC1mfgJagf

    Is it a fake?

    I don’t know? Why not ask Wokechoke, our resident expert on Ukrainian and Russian Jewish politicians?

    • Replies: @Mikhail
    @Mr. Hack


    I don’t know? Why not ask Wokechoke, our resident expert on Ukrainian and Russian Jewish politicians?
     
    Jewish American geopolitico Victoria Nuland might be better, recalling her support for Yats:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JoW75J5bnnE

    Prefer Sheila Broflovski to Nuland:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pq80MKS7prY

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

  574. @sudden death
    @Another Polish Perspective


    Let’s look whether something happens in 8 weeks then as well.
     
    If Prigo really stays in Belarus for longer, may as well start countdown till his march to Minsk and becoming the new dictator instead of Luka and in control of a smaller RF nuclear loot, lol

    https://i.postimg.cc/hv3Xn7SZ/wagnerclown.jpg

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @LondonBob

    Wagner being ‘punished’ by being sent Belarus where they can further secure the leadership there, as well as continue their business in Africa.

    Was wondering what Prigozhin was up to with his rants, we finally know what.

  575. @Mikhail

    See new Tweets
    Conversation
    Arthur Morgan
    @ArthurM40330824
    At what point has #Nazi #Germany cosplay in #Ukraine can be considered to have gone too far? Hummer SUVs with symbols of the times of the Wehrmacht, used by local military commissars to move around #Kyiv.
    How do #Germans feel about this?
     


    https://twitter.com/ArthurM40330824/status/1673380093886971906

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @German_reader

    It’s quite funny really. Although the use of it is rather bizarre. The iconography of the biggest military losers in the 20th century rehashed as a way to goad Russians.

  576. German_reader says:
    @Mikhail

    See new Tweets
    Conversation
    Arthur Morgan
    @ArthurM40330824
    At what point has #Nazi #Germany cosplay in #Ukraine can be considered to have gone too far? Hummer SUVs with symbols of the times of the Wehrmacht, used by local military commissars to move around #Kyiv.
    How do #Germans feel about this?
     


    https://twitter.com/ArthurM40330824/status/1673380093886971906

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @German_reader

    How do #Germans feel about this?

    Really bad that we can’t do it ourselves anymore (though one can always hope).
    Cultural appropriation isn’t ok in any case, my culture isn’t your costume!

  577. @Mikel
    @German_reader


    now the only way was through and Russia couldn’t afford to lose
     
    But Russia is going to lose with the Shoigu clan in charge. Or at best be forced to an unstable stalemate. A year and a half later half of Donetsk oblast is still controlled by the Ukrainians, including the outskirts of the capital, Russia was forced to retreat from the only regional capital it had occupied shortly after it was pronounced a part of Russia, the attack on Kharkiv and the march on Odessa were convincingly repulsed by the Ukrainian defenders before they had even received much help from the West and the pincer attack on Kiev turned into a cemetery of Russian armor and soldiers. It had to be cancelled. Time is not on Russia's side either. They may improve some aspects of their strategy but they are no match, industrially or technologically, against a West committed to supporting Ukraine. And what are those Russian patriots who don't want to face a defeat going to do when they do see their country defeated?

    Replies: @German_reader, @LondonBob, @Sean, @Wokechoke

    An attacking force is supposed to have three to one advantage, not a three to one deficit against a peer force, Russians have shown otherwise.

    Wishful thinking is why NATO thought they would have any more luck with the numbers even now, and the Ukrainians have paid a heavy price for such delusional thinking as the basis of their current offensive.

    [MORE]

    • Replies: @LondonBob
    @LondonBob

    As I understand a BTG had around 800 men, a Ukrainian brigade about 3000-4000. So about 12 thousand Russians occupied about sixty thousand or so Ukrainians.

    Unless the Ukrainians can find another anomaly like Kharkov, where there were just a few thousand Donbass conscripts and police units from Russia, they won't have any success, and they haven't before or since.

  578. @LondonBob
    @Mikel

    An attacking force is supposed to have three to one advantage, not a three to one deficit against a peer force, Russians have shown otherwise.

    Wishful thinking is why NATO thought they would have any more luck with the numbers even now, and the Ukrainians have paid a heavy price for such delusional thinking as the basis of their current offensive.



    https://twitter.com/MNormanDavies/status/1673728129578442753?s=20

    Replies: @LondonBob

    As I understand a BTG had around 800 men, a Ukrainian brigade about 3000-4000. So about 12 thousand Russians occupied about sixty thousand or so Ukrainians.

    Unless the Ukrainians can find another anomaly like Kharkov, where there were just a few thousand Donbass conscripts and police units from Russia, they won’t have any success, and they haven’t before or since.

  579. @S
    @Greasy William


    Russia is Magog, but I no longer think that Putin is Gog. Now I just think he’s an idiot. This not coup has brought closer a nationalist takeover of the RF and that guy will be Gog.
     
    This is a sensitive subject, but I'd be curious about your thoughts on these matters:

    A few years ago there was an organization of Christians, Moslems, and Jews (possibly now defunct) whom were concerned about the 'end time beliefs' of these spiritual systems potentially coming about in the near term, not due to God, but due to man made self fulfilling prophecies.

    Possibly related, many of the major characters on the present world stage, ie Zelensky, Prigozhin, Jared Kushner, Putin, Biden, Trump, etc, are either wholly (or largely) Jewish, or, are Gentile, but have many Jewish advisers they rely upon to govern.

    In the past there was the 1666 Sabattai Zevi debacle, and a long list (take a number!) of other Jewish false messiah claimants (see two links below), some of these at least also involving complicated dating calculations purportedly derived from Jewish scripture.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sabbateans

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Jewish_messiah_claimants

    As you probably know, anybody seen as a serious contender to be the Jewish messiah in present times, would almost certainly be seen by many Christians as the Anti-christ.

    We shall see.

    I mention the gregarious Jared Kushner here as I have commented upon in the past, that without stretching things, one can find in almost every major historical event of ancient Rome it's uncanny close parallel in the history of the New Rome, ie the United States.

    Relatedly, the First Triumvirate consisting of 'Rome's richest man', the Roman billionaire and real estate speculator Marcus Crassus, his up and coming political protégé Julius Caesar, and the Roman general Pompey, has it's close parallel in Donald Trump, his political protege Jared Kushner, and the army veteran Mike Pompeo.

    The First Triumvirate it will be recalled emerged as Rome was transitioning from a republic to a dictatorship. After Crassus' untimely death, the Triumvirate (and Rome itself) devolved into civil war between it's two surviving members, Pompey and Caesar. Caesar ultimately prevailed.

    One peculiar thing about Kushner (other than an unpleasant facial grimace he sometimes unconsciously displays) which is remindful of Sabattai Zevi and his 1666 false messiah proclamation, is the insistence Kushner had in purchasing that albatross hugely expensive property at 666 W Fifth Ave.

    Was this an inside joke showing his disdain towards Christian prophecy, or possibly something else? [See Kushner link below]

    https://www.jtrue.com/blog/the-second-coming

    Replies: @Another Polish Perspective, @Greasy William

    Why shouldn’t we live in the End Times? Much points to that conclusion.

    End Times is the Black Swan problem – you face it very very rarely, most people – never, so they think that it can never really happen. Even if it happens pretty often in movies recently – like now there is this “Asteroid City’ playing with the idea.

    Conservatives should cherish the idea – above all, it will be the proof that liberals are in union with Satan, and will be justly punished. Frankly, it would be very hard to turn the world around without major catastrophe.

  580. @Wokechoke
    @Another Polish Perspective

    The Jew King of …well he had to try it. Take him outside and dump his body in the Pripet marshes.

    Replies: @Another Polish Perspective

    A paedophile cannot be Messiah. Even Chabad knows this.

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @Another Polish Perspective

    Mohel's all craw blood for children's circumcisions.

  581. @Mikhail
    @Mr. Hack

    I get a lot of private feedback. Some recent samples -

    Pride goes before destruction, and a
    haughty spirit before a fall.
    Proverbs 16:18


    &

    Russia can bomb a children's hospital & Averko will proclaim "Putin cures child of cancer!"

    My replies -

    The irony of projection.

    Among others, US and Israel have done such with ******* either being non-committal or highlighting that the armed adversary used such an area as a human shield.

    ****

    Of possible interest:

    https://twitter.com/MatreshkaRF/status/1673708889626345477

    Is it a fake?

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @sudden death, @QCIC

    Lots of cuts and no reference to the original speech, no such words as “we killed our own country” in the speech, therefore 99,9% probability he was talking about RF political sphere and Zoperational propagandists as usual made a fake without giving the context of uncut speech.

  582. @Gerard1234
    @Mr. XYZ

    Yes.

    Poland's 2 best allies until March 1939, actually their only true friends......were Nazi Germany and Japan.

    Undoubtedly the Poles were planning for and inciting for a Nazi Germany-Poland-Japan joint-invasion of the USSR. The further into the 1930's then the less likely of Japan participating in a joint war against the Soviet Union because of our own clashes with Japan in the same period and some good Soviet diplomatic moves after 1935. Poland and Nazi Germany were united in their "principles", of wanting to destroy the USSR, and the Danzig/Polish corridor situation was easily solveable, but as ever with 2 rats together, the problem wasn't because of Danzig itself - but on the issue of Polish nujtob imperialism clashing with German liebensraum ambitions over the same territory of Banderastan. War against people of USSR was definite, they were just waiting to finish agreeing trade-0ff on these issues.
    As ever with Polish nutjobs, their schizophrenia of being war-lusting animals AND total cowards/pussys lead them to destruction.

    Polish intelligence services were intensely working throughout the 1930's to make this war happen - in the Russian Far East and of course its well known they sent masses of their own "civilians" into the western parts of Ukrainian and Belarus SSR to settle. The NKVD worked well but too late as this intelligence work by the Poles in these areas was very useful to the german preparation for Barbarossa.


    Maybe without the benefit of hindsight, the Poles felt that it was best for the Anglo-French to suffer a lot on their behalf
     
    This is interesting in that Polish scum like pretending to be French, and have traditionally always sucked French d**k, primarily because of France did Poland exist in the interwar period anyway.........which makes inexplicable Polish losers not signing a pact against Germany with France - a true stab in the back. Their own imperialistic ambitions, primarily with Belarus , Ukraine, western Russia, Lithuania, their own intense intelligence activity in USSR and their own attempts at Nazi-Poland-Japan joint invasion are the only plausible explanations of why no pact against Nazi's with France.

    The one thing that appears obvious to me is that a France-Czechoslovakia-Poland pact before 1939 would have stopped WW2, or at worst delayed it. Huge industrial capacity in France and Czecholovakia, exceeding Nazi Germany's. 3 big armies and populations, exceeding Nazi Germany's.
    East and west borders of Germany surrounded, some agreement with Britain's Royal Navy would result in French and Britain Navy's blockading the north of Germany from the Baltic Sea. A France-Czechoslovakia-USSR deal was achieved , but then of course prevented by Poland.

    So entirely because of Poland, there was no France-Czech-Poland alliance , which if created would have prevented any Nazi war.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    Would Polish cooperation have actually made the Anglo-French willing to fight for Czechoslovakia in 1938?

    And had Hitler genuinely been interested in the welfare of the Soviet people instead of merely exploiting them, allying with him would have been a great opportunity for Poland to realize its Promethean vision:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prometheism

    Of course, another way for Poland to save itself would have been an Anglo-Franco-Soviet alliance in 1939. This could have required the Anglo-French to agree to throw the Baltic countries under the Soviet bus, though.

    • Replies: @Gerard1234
    @Mr. XYZ

    As I implied before, if a Czechoslovakian-French-Soviet alliance was agreed in the mid-1930s, but Polish Nazis sabotaged the deal........ then a Czechoslovakian-French-Polish agreement was fully possible, and more optimal than the other option. A much bigger industrial potential combined than Nazi Germany, combined armies and civilian population equal to or bigger than the Nazis, Nazis forced to fight a multi-front wars, with those fronts equidistant apart and impossible to prioritise as they could with Eastern Front against others. It would have been a permanent deterrent.

    Poland - France bilateral at the time should have made US-Israel now look like Armenia-Turkey relations by comparison, but they weren't because Poles are serious f**k ups.

    As said by people several times before, giving the Nazis Czechoslovakia was equally as much West's own form of "Lend Lease" to the Nazis. Without industrial regions of Czechoslovakia, then no potential for Nazis to invade USSR. That they did get it was also enabled by standard parasitic-Polish pussy-waraddict behaviour.

  583. @Wokechoke
    @Sean

    The Tsar was a softie. He should have annihilated the Jews.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    The Jews were Russia’s cognitive elite. The goal should have been to aggressively encourage them to intermarry en masse with Slavs, as was the case in the late Soviet era. If anyone should have been exterminated by the Tsar, it was Lenin, Trotsky, and Stalin.

  584. @German_reader
    @Mikel


    But Russia is going to lose with the Shoigu clan in charge.
     
    Maybe. But that's an argument for switching to a war economy, mobilization and martial law, including the death penalty against subversive elements. Not for just giving up and trusting in the West's good intentions.

    And what are those Russian patriots who don’t want to face a defeat going to do when they do see their country defeated?
     
    Maybe prepare for the rematch like Germany did after WW1, and draw the appropriate lessons for next time. There already seems to be a lot of criticism after all that Putin is too moderate, too timid etc. And who knows what opportunities the future will hold. We're living in pretty unstable times.
    But of course there's a chance that all of this would go nuclear well before any such developments.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    Russians would be better off just breeding more, frankly. Ukraine should be admitted into NATO after the end of the current war in order to eliminate the risk of Russia ever trying to do the same thing again at any point in the future.

  585. Been reading extracts of the bourses set up at Irish colleges in France to defray the costs of poor students, and some are really quite interesting.

    [MORE]

    Almost all those set up by individuals give preference to nearest kin. Some are quite odd – sons of male relatives, but daughters of female ones. Orders of consideration extending to relatives without the name, to anyone with the name in the province, and then past the province, to anyone with the name (but by which I think they must have meant descent from the old clan.).

    Sometimes small groups of surnames were mysteriously invoked. Perhaps, the names of grandparents?

    The preference of current chiefs invoked in 1750! One man ordered that his genealogy be added to the records – I suppose the Revolutionaries probably tossed it, as they did with a lot of things, like the registers.

    A lot of it worked on rents of buildings owned. I suppose BlackRock would own it all today and give scholarships to gay Africans.

  586. @Mikel
    @German_reader


    now the only way was through and Russia couldn’t afford to lose
     
    But Russia is going to lose with the Shoigu clan in charge. Or at best be forced to an unstable stalemate. A year and a half later half of Donetsk oblast is still controlled by the Ukrainians, including the outskirts of the capital, Russia was forced to retreat from the only regional capital it had occupied shortly after it was pronounced a part of Russia, the attack on Kharkiv and the march on Odessa were convincingly repulsed by the Ukrainian defenders before they had even received much help from the West and the pincer attack on Kiev turned into a cemetery of Russian armor and soldiers. It had to be cancelled. Time is not on Russia's side either. They may improve some aspects of their strategy but they are no match, industrially or technologically, against a West committed to supporting Ukraine. And what are those Russian patriots who don't want to face a defeat going to do when they do see their country defeated?

    Replies: @German_reader, @LondonBob, @Sean, @Wokechoke

    I think the explanation for the undersized force was Putin originally intended the build up as a wedge to get Minsk2 (Donbas returned to Ukraine but as an autonomous region with a veto over Ukraine joining Nato) back on track. But

    Radio Free Europe
    Kremlin-Allied Ukrainian Lawmaker Medvedchuk’s House Arrest Extended
    Kyiv court has extended the house arrest of Kremlin-friendly tycoon and politician Viktor Medvedchuk, who is being held under suspicion of…
    .10 Jan 2022

    Charging Putin’s personal friend and point man in Ukraine with treason was something Zelensky obliviously never thought would precipitate what Ukrainian intel had assessed as a sabre rattling build up into a real invasion.

    Time is not on Russia’s side either. They may improve some aspects of their strategy but they are no match, industrially or technologically, against a West committed to supporting Ukraine.

    I agree the long term prospects are bad for Russia. The West is going to have arms production lines commissioned soon; they’ll need to do that to replenish their own contingency stocks, but the supply to Ukraine can only increase once the factories are producing arms (currently they are not). Russia must decide soon on whether to actually declare a war emergency and build an overwhelming force to batter Ukraine into coming to terms, or start looking for a way out of the conflict that involves a withdrawal. I think the Kremlin is ‘Putin’ off that decision to see how much better the Russian army in the field can do through improved discipline, organisation and tactics. The Russians are using what they have (eg electronic warfare) much more coordinately now. Possibly the plan is the army in Ukraine is to be battle hardened until it reached peak efficiency and then it will form a cadre for a coming mass influx of reservists that will be used for a big push.

  587. @Wokechoke
    @AP

    The Russians pushed them into the sea. And good riddance. I think you’ve tipped your hand on your ethnic origins Turk Boy.

    Replies: @songbird

    It may be that AP is a crypto-Turk who boosts Austria-Hungary and the Intermarium, as a cloak and disguise.

    The dismemberment of the Ottoman Empire would neatly explain his dislike of nationalism.

    [MORE]

    • Replies: @German_reader
    @songbird

    The bs about the poor, oppressed Crimean Tatars is just meant as a way to get around the fact that most of Crimea's current population is Russian or pro-Russian. Contrary to what AP asserts, it's actually the Ukrainian or pro-Ukrainian side which is playing the "muh colonialism" card and implicitly arguing that the Russians there are just colonial settlers who should leave if they don't like it.
    As for the history, really a bit much that one is apparently now expected to regard the Crimean Khanate as just some poor, innocent victim of Muscovite imperialism. But I guess there are enough Western normies who will believe it.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Mikhail, @AP

    , @Mr. XYZ
    @songbird

    If AP is a crypto-Turk, then wouldn't he actually want Turkey within the EU? But AFAIK, he opposes this. Though Poland, whom AP loves, actually does support Turkish EU membership.

    I think that he likes Austria-Hungary due to it being the effective eastern frontier of Catholic Christian civilization:

    The territories where Austria-Hungary existed are generally the eastward limit of Catholicism (both Roman Catholicism and Greek Catholicism) in Europe:

    https://external-preview.redd.it/kaiGtHmzvLXUWwJJh063c9AnPcoZvIM66BixLFA-NfI.jpg?auto=webp&s=ea1cef607ab6f9f8c6733209420abbb20b8d7263

    The major exception here is, of course, northern Albania.

    AP likes Intermarium due to it being an almost completely Muslim-free zone, which is also incompatible with him being a crypto-Turk. AP in generally is quite hostile towards Islam, likely in no small part due to Muslim terrorism and barbarity.

    Replies: @Wokechoke

    , @AP
    @songbird


    It may be that AP is a crypto-Turk who boosts Austria-Hungary and the Intermarium, as a cloak and disguise.
     
    Well, according to pan-Turkic nationalists, all Ukrainians are crypto-Turks. I had a friend in university about 30 years ago, from one of the ex-Soviet Turkic republics who was really into this idea, we had such a drunken geopolitical discussion. He was proclaiming that we are all Turks really, and that the Russians are our mutual enemies. He was a nephew of his country's president, and is now a high ranking government official, I am glad that his country supports Ukraine, such fantasies among Turks may be useful :-)

    And according to early modern Polish Sarmatists, all Polish nobles were crypto-Turks (they believed that they were descended from Sarmatians, and back then it was falsely believed that Sarmatians were Turkic people - we now know that Sarmatians were Iranic rather than Turkic). And this was at the time when Poles were always at war with the Turks. They thought of the conflict as religious more than ethnic.

    But in reality, I am less of a crypto-Turk than "wokechoke" is a crypto-Jew.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @Ivashka the fool, @songbird

  588. German_reader says:
    @songbird
    @Wokechoke

    It may be that AP is a crypto-Turk who boosts Austria-Hungary and the Intermarium, as a cloak and disguise.

    The dismemberment of the Ottoman Empire would neatly explain his dislike of nationalism.
    https://twitter.com/mmjukic/status/1673386691241951239?s=20

    Replies: @German_reader, @Mr. XYZ, @AP

    The bs about the poor, oppressed Crimean Tatars is just meant as a way to get around the fact that most of Crimea’s current population is Russian or pro-Russian. Contrary to what AP asserts, it’s actually the Ukrainian or pro-Ukrainian side which is playing the “muh colonialism” card and implicitly arguing that the Russians there are just colonial settlers who should leave if they don’t like it.
    As for the history, really a bit much that one is apparently now expected to regard the Crimean Khanate as just some poor, innocent victim of Muscovite imperialism. But I guess there are enough Western normies who will believe it.

    • Agree: songbird
    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @German_reader

    The best argument for Ukraine retaking Crimea is that it's internationally recognized Ukrainian territory and that Russia lost any moral claim it had to it by invading the rest of Ukraine in 2022. Debates about the Crimean Khanate are quite irrelevant here. Though FWIW, Russia was not exactly a pussycat towards Muslims back then either. The Circassian Genocide comes to mind.

    Replies: @German_reader, @Mikhail

    , @Mikhail
    @German_reader


    The bs about the poor, oppressed Crimean Tatars is just meant as a way to get around the fact that most of Crimea’s current population is Russian or pro-Russian. Contrary to what AP asserts, it’s actually the Ukrainian or pro-Ukrainian side which is playing the “muh colonialism” card and implicitly arguing that the Russians there are just colonial settlers who should leave if they don’t like it.
    As for the history, really a bit much that one is apparently now expected to regard the Crimean Khanate as just some poor, innocent victim of Muscovite imperialism. But I guess there are enough Western normies who will believe it.
     
    With the majority of Crimea's Ukrainians supporting that region's reunification with Russia, to go along with the majority of Ukraine's Crimean armed forces going over to Russia.

    On one of your points, I know a Ukrainian who said he had a cousin in the Ukrainian marines circa 1990s. His cousin was injured in a skirmish involving Crimean Tatar squatters, adding that such instances of Crimean Tatar violence weren't covered.

    Replies: @Wokechoke

    , @AP
    @German_reader


    The bs about the poor, oppressed Crimean Tatars is just meant as a way to get around the fact that most of Crimea’s current population is Russian or pro-Russian.
     
    It's not bs (they were mass deported, how is it bullshit about them being oppressed?). Some Russians make some silly claims about how Crimea is ancient or core Russian territory. So I pointed out that the Russians weren't even the largest ethnicity there until the early 20th century and not even the majority until World War II, when they mass deported the indigenous Tatars.

    Russians in Crimea are roughly analogous to Albanians in Kosovo. Except Albanians eventually became 90% of Kosovo's population while in 2014 Russians were only about 60% of Crimea's population.

    As for the history, really a bit much that one is apparently now expected to regard the Crimean Khanate as just some poor, innocent victim of Muscovite imperialism
     
    Can one also regard it as "a bit much" to regard the USSR (no less bloodthirsty, perhaps more, than the Crimean Khanate) as some poor, innocent victim of German imperialism?

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @Mikhail

  589. Atm Lukashenko sounds like bit reluctant still, despite all the public pomp about Wagner relocation:

    Belarusian regime-aligned news agency BelTA, citing Lukashenko during the ceremony of presenting military shoulder straps to senior officers.

    Quote: “We are not building any camps yet. But if they want to (I understand they are looking at certain areas), we will accommodate them. Put up tents, if you like. But for now, they are in Luhansk in their camps. And as Prigozhin, who called me yesterday, told me, somebody is going to sign a contract with [Russia’s Defence Minister Sergei] Shoigu at the Defence Ministry.

    We offered them one of the abandoned camps. They are welcome – the fence is there, and everything is in place. Put up your tents. We will help them as much as we can until they decide what to get up to.”

    https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2023/06/27/7408795/

    • LOL: LatW
    • Replies: @LatW
    @sudden death

    Typical Luka. :) Too funny. "Here's a camp with a fence where you can live, here's a plot where you can grow some potatoes". LOL

    Of course, he doesn't want them there. He likes "sovereignty". :) The Belarusian military probably don't like them all that much either.

    They may split them up and disperse them into different units. But the Wagnerites probably won't like it. I wonder if they have run out of money, apparently they found millions of dollars & roubles in cash and gold bars on Prigo, as well as fake passports, I wonder if they confiscated all that. Who knows if he was going to share that with all his mercs or just take it and bail (as a Plan B if the "coup" didn't work).

    According to Osechkin from Gulagu.net, all those "businesses" they have in Africa are connected to the very top (Kovalchuk, Timchenko, Putin). So they do rely on Wagner to police it there. This is apparently the reason why they have not yet eliminated them (they could've easily done it in Ukraine, if they had wanted to).

    But Prigo apparently flew to St Pete again.

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @QCIC

  590. @Mikhail
    @Mr. Hack

    I get a lot of private feedback. Some recent samples -

    Pride goes before destruction, and a
    haughty spirit before a fall.
    Proverbs 16:18


    &

    Russia can bomb a children's hospital & Averko will proclaim "Putin cures child of cancer!"

    My replies -

    The irony of projection.

    Among others, US and Israel have done such with ******* either being non-committal or highlighting that the armed adversary used such an area as a human shield.

    ****

    Of possible interest:

    https://twitter.com/MatreshkaRF/status/1673708889626345477

    Is it a fake?

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @sudden death, @QCIC

    “Nazis in Ukraine, shocking I tell you, just shocking!” LOL.

    We know the points about NeoNAZIs in Ukraine are generally valid. Sure Hack and AP can weasel around on the fine details but the overall information is accurate.

    It would be nice to know the provenance of the video, but the propaganda could go either way. Now that wider swaths of people have begun to recognize the NeoNAZI issue as real, the powers that be will use all the tricks in the book to hide any connection with these pariahs.

    Jewish elements will eventually be hunting your NeoNAZI Nationalist buddies and nary a peep will be made by the same folks who previously supported them.

    I wonder if Yats wants to be President of the rump Ukraine?

  591. Am fascinated by this idea of different global zones based on social strategies.

    [MORE]

    Seems to me that only the East Asian one has a pretty clear theory behind it (rice acquaculture). Am puzzled to varying degrees about the others, but especially by Latin America, which captures my imagination. Would it be the same or different for black Africa?

    • Thanks: Mr. XYZ
  592. @Anatoly Karlin
    @Mr. XYZ


    BTW, what are your thoughts on having a pro-Western post-Putin Russia join the EU in order to achieve greater economies of scale...
     
    I would support Russia joining the EU. However, Europe politically reduced to a geographic concept is Eurocentric, exclusionist, and practically racist. As with the US, I would campaign to open up membership to the Middle East, Africa, and beyond (ofc contingent on them adopting democracy, secular liberalism, feminism, LGBT rights, and so forth). While even the EU is historically regressive, to the extent that its expansion undermines the cohesion of the traditional nation-state and moves the world closer to the economies of scale it would enjoy with universal Open Borders, I support it.

    And what do you think about Garett Jones’s argument that natalism would still be relevant even in the AI age
     
    It depends on timelines. Quick AI timelines make it utterly irrelevant. The main focus should be loosening regulations in order to accelerate genomic intelligence augmentation.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Mr. XYZ

    I would support Russia joining the EU. However, Europe politically reduced to a geographic concept is Eurocentric, exclusionist, and practically racist. As with the US, I would campaign to open up membership to the Middle East, Africa, and beyond (ofc contingent on them adopting democracy, secular liberalism, feminism, LGBT rights, and so forth). While even the EU is historically regressive, to the extent that its expansion undermines the cohesion of the traditional nation-state and moves the world closer to the economies of scale it would enjoy with universal Open Borders, I support it.

    If one wants greater economies of scale, why not support pro-natalism as well? That also produces larger economies of scale. And possibly of better quality than with open borders. If you’re saying that AI makes natalism irrelevant, then why exactly does it not make immigration irrelevant as well? Mass-producing super-smart AI strikes me as a much better way of achieving greater economies of scale than importing non-culturally-compatible working-class Third Worlders, don’t you think? It won’t turn much of the West into a dump, after all. (Advocating turning the West into a dump while not intending to subsequently stay in the West to deal with the results of the mess that you helped create strikes me as being awfully disgraceful.)

    If AI will also produce a cure to aging, then this will also eventually reach the Third World, in which case Third Worlders would have the luxury of waiting until their countries become rich rather than seeking to immigrate to the First World en masse. And sufficiently smart AI can make even the Third World rich very quickly, no? It would produce an extremely massive smart fraction gain even for those countries, no? (Since the West and/or East Asia will eventually bring its AI over to the Third World as well, right?)

    BTW, having Third World countries embrace Western values and Western concepts and norms is going to be quite a challenge. Turkey is pretty secular by Muslim standards and yet it is still very far from getting EU membership. Latin America embraces a lot of Western values but is unfortunately notoriously homicidal–so, not ready for EU membership even if offered. And the rest of the Third World is much less culturally compatible with the EU at this point in time, other than perhaps their cognitive elites.

    It depends on timelines. Quick AI timelines make it utterly irrelevant. The main focus should be loosening regulations in order to accelerate genomic intelligence augmentation.

    Wouldn’t quick AI timelines make genomic intelligence augmentation “utterly irrelevant” as well? After all, why upgrade humans when you already have super-smart AI doing all of the difficult thinking and analyzing for humans?

    BTW, do you acknowledge that Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine was a huge mistake since it denied tens/hundreds of thousands of people the chance to get access to anti-aging technology by getting killed prematurely* and also due to the fact that quick AI timelines would make any Russian gains from a conquest of Ukraine quite irrelevant since there’s no way in Hell that a couple dozen million average 95 IQ Eastern Slavs are going to be able to compete with super-smart AI in the long-run (and since Russia is not a world leader in AI in any case)? Russia would have been much better off not getting involved in Ukraine in 2022, or even in 2014, for that matter, and instead maintained its good ties with the West (and with China as well), gotten easy access to super-smart AI, and then re-programmed this AI to identify as Ukrainians and to be loyal to Russia. Seems more prudent and more effective, no? Seriously. The IQ of super-smart AI is going to be much higher than 95 or 110 or even 160, after all.

    *And I don’t think that you can really blame the West for aiding Ukraine and thus prolonging the war unless you also want to blame Russia for aiding Serbia in 1914 and thus making WWI much, much bloodier than it would have otherwise been since Russia transformed a local Austro-Serbian war into a World War. If Serbs in 1914 were actually interested in saving their own people’s lives to the maximum extent/degree possible, then they should have *unconditionally* accepted Austria-Hungary’s ultimatum *in its entirety* (however unfair and unjust they might have considered it to be) and also quickly surrendered to Austria-Hungary if Austria-Hungary would have subsequently invaded Serbia anyway.

    BTW, off-topic, but in regards to a one-world government, even one noted supporter of open borders (Ilya Somin) has pointed out that a one-world government can result in a global tyranny with no exit options:

    https://fee.org/articles/a-cosmopolitan-case-against-world-government/

    He, of course, supports government in general being as small as possible due to him being a libertarian.

    Ultimately, though, the biggest criticism of open borders, and the most effective one, is that the effects of open borders cannot be reversed short of mass expulsions/ethnic cleansing or worse. This is similar to what @HeTows on Twitter told me about Israeli Jews: Most of them prefer neither, but if forced to choose, they would prefer religious Jewish fascists over a one-state solution because the odds of religious Jewish fascists and/or their descendants eventually secularizing are much higher than the odds of Arabs converting en masse to Judaism after replacing Jews as the majority ethnic group in Israel. Very cynical but true.

    • Replies: @Anatoly Karlin
    @Mr. XYZ


    If one wants greater economies of scale, why not support pro-natalism as well?
     
    There is no such thing as "Western values" (claims otherwise are chauvinist). There are values embraced by elite human capital (EHC) and all societies converge to them as EHC wins argument after argument.

    Natalism is implicitly anti-feminist. EHC rejects natalism. However, EHC is much more open to positive eugenics.

    AIs are good but potentially dangerous. A biosingularity is safer.

    Advocating turning the West into a dump while not intending to subsequently stay in the West to deal with the results of the mess that you helped create strikes me as being awfully disgraceful.
     
    EHC laughs at the idea of feeling some attachment to arbitray scraps of land, LOL.

    EHC doesn't fear competition. It thrives wherever it goes. If parts of the world landscape known as Western becomes dumps, EHC is free to create its own functional communities elsewhere, including in the Third World.

    BTW, off-topic, but in regards to a one-world government, even one noted supporter of open borders (Ilya Somin) has pointed out that a one-world government can result in a global tyranny with no exit options
     
    The main point is to collapse all existing nation-states along with Open Borders simultaneously. The organizing principle would be network states that own parcels of land in different areas of the world, secured on decentralized blockchain.

    BTW, do you acknowledge that Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine was a huge mistake since it denied tens/hundreds of thousands of people the chance to get access to anti-aging technology by getting killed prematurely...
     
    Yes, it was obviously a glaring demonstration of the total bankruptcy of nationalism and right-wing conservatism and associated EHC-uncompliant ideologies, and a strong signal that the world would be better off without them.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Mr. XYZ, @Emil Nikola Richard, @Yevardian, @Mr. XYZ

  593. @German_reader
    @songbird

    The bs about the poor, oppressed Crimean Tatars is just meant as a way to get around the fact that most of Crimea's current population is Russian or pro-Russian. Contrary to what AP asserts, it's actually the Ukrainian or pro-Ukrainian side which is playing the "muh colonialism" card and implicitly arguing that the Russians there are just colonial settlers who should leave if they don't like it.
    As for the history, really a bit much that one is apparently now expected to regard the Crimean Khanate as just some poor, innocent victim of Muscovite imperialism. But I guess there are enough Western normies who will believe it.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Mikhail, @AP

    The best argument for Ukraine retaking Crimea is that it’s internationally recognized Ukrainian territory and that Russia lost any moral claim it had to it by invading the rest of Ukraine in 2022. Debates about the Crimean Khanate are quite irrelevant here. Though FWIW, Russia was not exactly a pussycat towards Muslims back then either. The Circassian Genocide comes to mind.

    • Disagree: Mikhail
    • Troll: QCIC
    • Replies: @German_reader
    @Mr. XYZ


    The best argument for Ukraine retaking Crimea is that it’s internationally recognized Ukrainian territory
     
    Who gives a fuck, that wasn't relevant in Kosovo either. Ukraine forfeited its rights to Crimea and Eastern Donbass through its own policies, and if they had any sense they'd actually be glad to be rid of those regions with their pro-Russian minorities.

    Debates about the Crimean Khanate are quite irrelevant here.
     
    It's the Ukrainian side which brings up that history, because Islamophile anti-colonialism sells well in the current West (at least when it's not about Israel).
    Anyway, what was that word again...liberast? You really come across like the perfect embodiment. Would certainly be justified to send you to a homo concentration camp in Uganda. But on the other hand, you're such a weirdo you might actually enjoy being brutalized by big bad negroes. So I suppose the only option is to just scroll over your logorrheic comments.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Wokechoke, @Mikel

    , @Mikhail
    @Mr. XYZ


    The best argument for Ukraine retaking Crimea is that it’s internationally recognized Ukrainian territory and that Russia lost any moral claim it had to it by invading the rest of Ukraine in 2022. Debates about the Crimean Khanate are quite irrelevant here. Though FWIW, Russia was not exactly a pussycat towards Muslims back then either. The Circassian Genocide comes to mind.
     
    Pre-Soviet Russia had an honored and respected Ciscassian force. There were other Circassians who took a violent unfriendly route that led to a counter-response.
  594. @songbird
    @Wokechoke

    It may be that AP is a crypto-Turk who boosts Austria-Hungary and the Intermarium, as a cloak and disguise.

    The dismemberment of the Ottoman Empire would neatly explain his dislike of nationalism.
    https://twitter.com/mmjukic/status/1673386691241951239?s=20

    Replies: @German_reader, @Mr. XYZ, @AP

    If AP is a crypto-Turk, then wouldn’t he actually want Turkey within the EU? But AFAIK, he opposes this. Though Poland, whom AP loves, actually does support Turkish EU membership.

    I think that he likes Austria-Hungary due to it being the effective eastern frontier of Catholic Christian civilization:

    The territories where Austria-Hungary existed are generally the eastward limit of Catholicism (both Roman Catholicism and Greek Catholicism) in Europe:

    The major exception here is, of course, northern Albania.

    AP likes Intermarium due to it being an almost completely Muslim-free zone, which is also incompatible with him being a crypto-Turk. AP in generally is quite hostile towards Islam, likely in no small part due to Muslim terrorism and barbarity.

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @Mr. XYZ

    The Intermarium as Pilsudski outlined it would always favour Islamic populations as it would have required Turkish support and Tartar manpower to keep Russians out. Or at least have Turks block Russian goods out of Azov. This would have forced the Russians to trade over land with Polish markups and customs stations.

    The Commonwealth repeatedly sides with the Khans in Crimea and The Golden Horde and was effectively on the same side as Istanbul several times.

    One detail that we don’t talk about viz the Napoleonic Invasion of Russia is that Poles took part in huge numbers. Additionally the Russians had been locked in combat with the Ottomans for the better part of 25 years when Napoleon struck. The Russo-Turkish war concluded a few months before Napoleon and his Poles invaded. That’s de facto alliance with the Turks. The Poles have been trying to live rent free over assisting the Viennese in 1688 but conveniently airbrush out how they allied with the Turks again and again in the Black Sea.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russo-Turkish_War_(1806–1812)


    Besides this war fought by Russia to boot out the Turks on the Danube once and for all, The Swedish King Carolus had to hide out in the Ottoman Empire after he shit the bed in Ukraine’s Poltava against Peter the Great earlier in the war Great Northern War.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Northern_War

    This stuff you claim about the presence of Muslims is specious. AP has fuck all to say about Bosnia or Albania. Nothing to say about Turkey being in NATO either.

    Replies: @AP

  595. German_reader says:
    @Mr. XYZ
    @German_reader

    The best argument for Ukraine retaking Crimea is that it's internationally recognized Ukrainian territory and that Russia lost any moral claim it had to it by invading the rest of Ukraine in 2022. Debates about the Crimean Khanate are quite irrelevant here. Though FWIW, Russia was not exactly a pussycat towards Muslims back then either. The Circassian Genocide comes to mind.

    Replies: @German_reader, @Mikhail

    The best argument for Ukraine retaking Crimea is that it’s internationally recognized Ukrainian territory

    Who gives a fuck, that wasn’t relevant in Kosovo either. Ukraine forfeited its rights to Crimea and Eastern Donbass through its own policies, and if they had any sense they’d actually be glad to be rid of those regions with their pro-Russian minorities.

    Debates about the Crimean Khanate are quite irrelevant here.

    It’s the Ukrainian side which brings up that history, because Islamophile anti-colonialism sells well in the current West (at least when it’s not about Israel).
    Anyway, what was that word again…liberast? You really come across like the perfect embodiment. Would certainly be justified to send you to a homo concentration camp in Uganda. But on the other hand, you’re such a weirdo you might actually enjoy being brutalized by big bad negroes. So I suppose the only option is to just scroll over your logorrheic comments.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @German_reader


    Who gives a fuck, that wasn’t relevant in Kosovo either. Ukraine forfeited its rights to Crimea and Eastern Donbass through its own policies, and if they had any sense they’d actually be glad to be rid of those regions with their pro-Russian minorities.
     
    By Western logic, Serbia forfeited its claim to Kosovo with its human rights abuses. But here Russia rather than Ukraine is the bad guy. Now, had Ukraine tried to do an Operation Storm on the Donbass, then Yes, Russia would be entitled to getting it if that's what the people there would have wanted. But Ukraine did not have any definitive such plans when Russia attacked it in 2022.

    FWIW, if I was a Ukrainian, I'd have favored letting Crimea and Donbass go before the current war. But the current war would make me reconsider my own views on this. At the very least, I'd want something big in exchange for this, such as NATO membership and (already done) a long-term pathway to EU membership. You are very much correct that those regions were not beneficial to Ukraine in a political sense, though this is less relevant now when the rest of Ukraine is so overwhelmingly hostile towards Russia. Was more relevant before the current war:

    https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/12/06/ukraine-better-without-donbass-costly-reconstruction-pro-russia-west/

    It’s the Ukrainian side which brings up that history, because Islamophile anti-colonialism sells well in the current West (at least when it’s not about Israel).
     
    But didn't the Crimean Khanate engage in slave trading? Though I suppose that Ukrainians could argue that had they not quarreled with the Poles and had the PLC not been partitioned, then it would have been the PLC rather than Russia which would have conquered the Crimean Khanate.

    Anyway, what was that word again…liberast? You really come across like the perfect embodiment. Would certainly be justified to send you to a homo concentration camp in Uganda. But on the other hand, you’re such a weirdo you might actually enjoy being brutalized by big bad negroes. So I suppose the only option is to just scroll over your logorrheic comments.
     
    I don't like big black cock lol. I prefer this BBC instead:

    https://www.bbc.com/

    Thanks for reminding me of these fake McDonald's commercials, BTW:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KOiwODsDtkw

    As for Uganda, it's quite pathetic that Africans independently recreate outdated 19th century Western moral concepts (extreme homophobia) even after Westerners themselves have long abandoned them.

    Uganda produces characters like these:

    https://twitter.com/AfricaFactsZone/status/1592280894827642880?lang=en

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Ssempa

    As a side note, I read that there was this one female Ugandan immigrant to the US that pretended to be a lesbian (even going off of birth control to reduce the risk of her being accused of sexual orientation fraud) so that she could successfully get asylum over here.

    You might enjoy this, BTW: A hot (white) date tried to engage in theft but got stopped:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VsXDUEe_9Rs

    Replies: @Coconuts

    , @Wokechoke
    @German_reader

    Exactly Serbia got wrecked by NATO because Albanians multiplied so fast in one of their border cities. All Russia need do is fight. They’ve got enough stamina to keep what they now hold.

    , @Mikel
    @German_reader


    So I suppose the only option is to just scroll over your logorrheic comments.
     
    Especially considering that he doesn't seem to be subject to the posting restrictions that the rest of us are. Sadly, my prediction from a couple of weeks ago that the pervy alt-historian was going to bring this blog down is clearly materializing. I had never had to scroll past so many comments here in order to find something of interest. What I didn't expect is that our former host would join his lgbt buddy in the final demise of his blog. But the world has definitely entered an accelerationist phase and it's hard getting surprised at anything anymore. Btw, transitioning from the enthusiastic defense of a bloodbath without any recent precedent on European soil to advocating for child genital mutilation and all the rest of the crap that the "human elites" try to shove down our throats is not as unnatural as it might seem at first sight. If you're capable of finding the former virtuous, why not the latter?

    Replies: @sudden death, @Anatoly Karlin

  596. @sudden death
    Atm Lukashenko sounds like bit reluctant still, despite all the public pomp about Wagner relocation:

    Belarusian regime-aligned news agency BelTA, citing Lukashenko during the ceremony of presenting military shoulder straps to senior officers.

    Quote: "We are not building any camps yet. But if they want to (I understand they are looking at certain areas), we will accommodate them. Put up tents, if you like. But for now, they are in Luhansk in their camps. And as Prigozhin, who called me yesterday, told me, somebody is going to sign a contract with [Russia's Defence Minister Sergei] Shoigu at the Defence Ministry.

    We offered them one of the abandoned camps. They are welcome – the fence is there, and everything is in place. Put up your tents. We will help them as much as we can until they decide what to get up to."
     

    https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2023/06/27/7408795/

    Replies: @LatW

    Typical Luka. 🙂 Too funny. “Here’s a camp with a fence where you can live, here’s a plot where you can grow some potatoes”. LOL

    Of course, he doesn’t want them there. He likes “sovereignty”. 🙂 The Belarusian military probably don’t like them all that much either.

    They may split them up and disperse them into different units. But the Wagnerites probably won’t like it. I wonder if they have run out of money, apparently they found millions of dollars & roubles in cash and gold bars on Prigo, as well as fake passports, I wonder if they confiscated all that. Who knows if he was going to share that with all his mercs or just take it and bail (as a Plan B if the “coup” didn’t work).

    According to Osechkin from Gulagu.net, all those “businesses” they have in Africa are connected to the very top (Kovalchuk, Timchenko, Putin). So they do rely on Wagner to police it there. This is apparently the reason why they have not yet eliminated them (they could’ve easily done it in Ukraine, if they had wanted to).

    But Prigo apparently flew to St Pete again.

    • Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
    @LatW

    Apparently Belarus is number one in per capita potato consumption.

    https://i.redd.it/ns0mhkcusl8b1.png

    Replies: @LatW

    , @QCIC
    @LatW

    If Russia wants to send Wagner troops to lurk above Kiev, I don't see a good reason they need to be coy about it. They can't hide it.

    Wagner troops could be in Belarus to fight fifth columnists.

    It would not surprise me if they want to send 10 thousand Wagnerians to Kaliningrad to bolster defenses there.

  597. @Mikel
    @German_reader


    now the only way was through and Russia couldn’t afford to lose
     
    But Russia is going to lose with the Shoigu clan in charge. Or at best be forced to an unstable stalemate. A year and a half later half of Donetsk oblast is still controlled by the Ukrainians, including the outskirts of the capital, Russia was forced to retreat from the only regional capital it had occupied shortly after it was pronounced a part of Russia, the attack on Kharkiv and the march on Odessa were convincingly repulsed by the Ukrainian defenders before they had even received much help from the West and the pincer attack on Kiev turned into a cemetery of Russian armor and soldiers. It had to be cancelled. Time is not on Russia's side either. They may improve some aspects of their strategy but they are no match, industrially or technologically, against a West committed to supporting Ukraine. And what are those Russian patriots who don't want to face a defeat going to do when they do see their country defeated?

    Replies: @German_reader, @LondonBob, @Sean, @Wokechoke

    This isn’t all that much different from the Livonia Wars or various border wars between Poland and Russia. Inconclusive and colourful militias with charismatic messiah like False Dimitry etc.

  598. @German_reader
    @Mr. XYZ


    The best argument for Ukraine retaking Crimea is that it’s internationally recognized Ukrainian territory
     
    Who gives a fuck, that wasn't relevant in Kosovo either. Ukraine forfeited its rights to Crimea and Eastern Donbass through its own policies, and if they had any sense they'd actually be glad to be rid of those regions with their pro-Russian minorities.

    Debates about the Crimean Khanate are quite irrelevant here.
     
    It's the Ukrainian side which brings up that history, because Islamophile anti-colonialism sells well in the current West (at least when it's not about Israel).
    Anyway, what was that word again...liberast? You really come across like the perfect embodiment. Would certainly be justified to send you to a homo concentration camp in Uganda. But on the other hand, you're such a weirdo you might actually enjoy being brutalized by big bad negroes. So I suppose the only option is to just scroll over your logorrheic comments.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Wokechoke, @Mikel

    Who gives a fuck, that wasn’t relevant in Kosovo either. Ukraine forfeited its rights to Crimea and Eastern Donbass through its own policies, and if they had any sense they’d actually be glad to be rid of those regions with their pro-Russian minorities.

    By Western logic, Serbia forfeited its claim to Kosovo with its human rights abuses. But here Russia rather than Ukraine is the bad guy. Now, had Ukraine tried to do an Operation Storm on the Donbass, then Yes, Russia would be entitled to getting it if that’s what the people there would have wanted. But Ukraine did not have any definitive such plans when Russia attacked it in 2022.

    FWIW, if I was a Ukrainian, I’d have favored letting Crimea and Donbass go before the current war. But the current war would make me reconsider my own views on this. At the very least, I’d want something big in exchange for this, such as NATO membership and (already done) a long-term pathway to EU membership. You are very much correct that those regions were not beneficial to Ukraine in a political sense, though this is less relevant now when the rest of Ukraine is so overwhelmingly hostile towards Russia. Was more relevant before the current war:

    https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/12/06/ukraine-better-without-donbass-costly-reconstruction-pro-russia-west/

    It’s the Ukrainian side which brings up that history, because Islamophile anti-colonialism sells well in the current West (at least when it’s not about Israel).

    But didn’t the Crimean Khanate engage in slave trading? Though I suppose that Ukrainians could argue that had they not quarreled with the Poles and had the PLC not been partitioned, then it would have been the PLC rather than Russia which would have conquered the Crimean Khanate.

    Anyway, what was that word again…liberast? You really come across like the perfect embodiment. Would certainly be justified to send you to a homo concentration camp in Uganda. But on the other hand, you’re such a weirdo you might actually enjoy being brutalized by big bad negroes. So I suppose the only option is to just scroll over your logorrheic comments.

    I don’t like big black cock lol. I prefer this BBC instead:

    https://www.bbc.com/

    Thanks for reminding me of these fake McDonald’s commercials, BTW:

    As for Uganda, it’s quite pathetic that Africans independently recreate outdated 19th century Western moral concepts (extreme homophobia) even after Westerners themselves have long abandoned them.

    Uganda produces characters like these:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Ssempa

    As a side note, I read that there was this one female Ugandan immigrant to the US that pretended to be a lesbian (even going off of birth control to reduce the risk of her being accused of sexual orientation fraud) so that she could successfully get asylum over here.

    You might enjoy this, BTW: A hot (white) date tried to engage in theft but got stopped:

    • Replies: @Coconuts
    @Mr. XYZ

    Maybe the hostility to male homosexual activities in these African countries comes from reading the Bible.

    And/or the social construct theory about disgust over male homosexual practices is a kind of cope. Seems easy to think of evolutionary reasons for this reaction, and it not really being present for lesbianism.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

  599. @German_reader
    @Mr. XYZ


    The best argument for Ukraine retaking Crimea is that it’s internationally recognized Ukrainian territory
     
    Who gives a fuck, that wasn't relevant in Kosovo either. Ukraine forfeited its rights to Crimea and Eastern Donbass through its own policies, and if they had any sense they'd actually be glad to be rid of those regions with their pro-Russian minorities.

    Debates about the Crimean Khanate are quite irrelevant here.
     
    It's the Ukrainian side which brings up that history, because Islamophile anti-colonialism sells well in the current West (at least when it's not about Israel).
    Anyway, what was that word again...liberast? You really come across like the perfect embodiment. Would certainly be justified to send you to a homo concentration camp in Uganda. But on the other hand, you're such a weirdo you might actually enjoy being brutalized by big bad negroes. So I suppose the only option is to just scroll over your logorrheic comments.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Wokechoke, @Mikel

    Exactly Serbia got wrecked by NATO because Albanians multiplied so fast in one of their border cities. All Russia need do is fight. They’ve got enough stamina to keep what they now hold.

  600. @S
    @Greasy William


    Russia is Magog, but I no longer think that Putin is Gog. Now I just think he’s an idiot. This not coup has brought closer a nationalist takeover of the RF and that guy will be Gog.
     
    This is a sensitive subject, but I'd be curious about your thoughts on these matters:

    A few years ago there was an organization of Christians, Moslems, and Jews (possibly now defunct) whom were concerned about the 'end time beliefs' of these spiritual systems potentially coming about in the near term, not due to God, but due to man made self fulfilling prophecies.

    Possibly related, many of the major characters on the present world stage, ie Zelensky, Prigozhin, Jared Kushner, Putin, Biden, Trump, etc, are either wholly (or largely) Jewish, or, are Gentile, but have many Jewish advisers they rely upon to govern.

    In the past there was the 1666 Sabattai Zevi debacle, and a long list (take a number!) of other Jewish false messiah claimants (see two links below), some of these at least also involving complicated dating calculations purportedly derived from Jewish scripture.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sabbateans

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Jewish_messiah_claimants

    As you probably know, anybody seen as a serious contender to be the Jewish messiah in present times, would almost certainly be seen by many Christians as the Anti-christ.

    We shall see.

    I mention the gregarious Jared Kushner here as I have commented upon in the past, that without stretching things, one can find in almost every major historical event of ancient Rome it's uncanny close parallel in the history of the New Rome, ie the United States.

    Relatedly, the First Triumvirate consisting of 'Rome's richest man', the Roman billionaire and real estate speculator Marcus Crassus, his up and coming political protégé Julius Caesar, and the Roman general Pompey, has it's close parallel in Donald Trump, his political protege Jared Kushner, and the army veteran Mike Pompeo.

    The First Triumvirate it will be recalled emerged as Rome was transitioning from a republic to a dictatorship. After Crassus' untimely death, the Triumvirate (and Rome itself) devolved into civil war between it's two surviving members, Pompey and Caesar. Caesar ultimately prevailed.

    One peculiar thing about Kushner (other than an unpleasant facial grimace he sometimes unconsciously displays) which is remindful of Sabattai Zevi and his 1666 false messiah proclamation, is the insistence Kushner had in purchasing that albatross hugely expensive property at 666 W Fifth Ave.

    Was this an inside joke showing his disdain towards Christian prophecy, or possibly something else? [See Kushner link below]

    https://www.jtrue.com/blog/the-second-coming

    Replies: @Another Polish Perspective, @Greasy William

    I had never heard about the multi faith group trying to avoid the end times.

    Every major failed messiah claimant in history also had huge internal Jewish opposition. Certainly Zevi did. I don’t see any messianic type figures out there right now.

    I do agree that it is preferable that people who think like me are kept far away from the levers of power. If I was Israeli PM I would just do everything I could to provoke Russia because I’m convinced a nuclear holocaust is inevitable so we might as well get it over with. I’m glad our leaders are at least trying to avoid that.

    My interpretation of Revelation is that it is a revenge fantasy of an unhinged and drug addled Jewish ultra nationalist. 666 is obviously a reference to Nero. I don’t think the book has any prophetic value and I’m certainly not alone: it came very close to not being made part of the canon by the Church Fathers, Luther wanted to remove it (he also wanted to remove James but political reasons made it impossible to remove either) from the Bible and Calvin didn’t even bother to write a commentary on it (after writing a commentary on every other book in both the Old Testament and the New).

    • Replies: @S
    @Greasy William


    I had never heard about the multi faith group trying to avoid the end times.

     

    Not trying 'to avoid the end times', rather they were concerned about 'self-fulfilling prophecy'.


    I don’t think the book [Revelation] has any prophetic value and I’m certainly not alone..

     

    Aa far as I know you are not a Christian, so understandable.


    If I was Israeli PM I would just do everything I could to provoke Russia because I’m convinced a nuclear holocaust is inevitable so we might as well get it over with.
     
    Well, that's not a very positive outlook. [Here I think you are trolling.]


    666 is obviously a reference to Nero.
     
    Whaaaaat? You don't think it's a reference to Ronald Wilson Reagan or the new King Charles...the latter long being seen as a favorite candidate. (J/k)

    Am reminded how once the old Art Bell show one night featured an 'Anti-christ hotline'. Only the A-C could call in. That was rather amusing. :-D

    Anyhow, thanks for your thoughts.
    , @Greasy William
    @Greasy William


    Well, that’s not a very positive outlook. [Here I think you are trolling.]
     
    Not only am I not trolling, I thought you believed the same thing. You don't believe there is going to be a massive, multi nation nuclear exchange within the next 10 to 20 years? Honestly, I could see it happening as early as 2027.

    Replies: @S

  601. @Mr. XYZ
    @songbird

    If AP is a crypto-Turk, then wouldn't he actually want Turkey within the EU? But AFAIK, he opposes this. Though Poland, whom AP loves, actually does support Turkish EU membership.

    I think that he likes Austria-Hungary due to it being the effective eastern frontier of Catholic Christian civilization:

    The territories where Austria-Hungary existed are generally the eastward limit of Catholicism (both Roman Catholicism and Greek Catholicism) in Europe:

    https://external-preview.redd.it/kaiGtHmzvLXUWwJJh063c9AnPcoZvIM66BixLFA-NfI.jpg?auto=webp&s=ea1cef607ab6f9f8c6733209420abbb20b8d7263

    The major exception here is, of course, northern Albania.

    AP likes Intermarium due to it being an almost completely Muslim-free zone, which is also incompatible with him being a crypto-Turk. AP in generally is quite hostile towards Islam, likely in no small part due to Muslim terrorism and barbarity.

    Replies: @Wokechoke

    The Intermarium as Pilsudski outlined it would always favour Islamic populations as it would have required Turkish support and Tartar manpower to keep Russians out. Or at least have Turks block Russian goods out of Azov. This would have forced the Russians to trade over land with Polish markups and customs stations.

    The Commonwealth repeatedly sides with the Khans in Crimea and The Golden Horde and was effectively on the same side as Istanbul several times.

    One detail that we don’t talk about viz the Napoleonic Invasion of Russia is that Poles took part in huge numbers. Additionally the Russians had been locked in combat with the Ottomans for the better part of 25 years when Napoleon struck. The Russo-Turkish war concluded a few months before Napoleon and his Poles invaded. That’s de facto alliance with the Turks. The Poles have been trying to live rent free over assisting the Viennese in 1688 but conveniently airbrush out how they allied with the Turks again and again in the Black Sea.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russo-Turkish_War_(1806–1812)

    Besides this war fought by Russia to boot out the Turks on the Danube once and for all, The Swedish King Carolus had to hide out in the Ottoman Empire after he shit the bed in Ukraine’s Poltava against Peter the Great earlier in the war Great Northern War.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Northern_War

    This stuff you claim about the presence of Muslims is specious. AP has fuck all to say about Bosnia or Albania. Nothing to say about Turkey being in NATO either.

    • Replies: @AP
    @Wokechoke

    Congratulations on having some of the most retarded takes of anyone here.


    The Poles have been trying to live rent free over assisting the Viennese in 1688 but conveniently airbrush out how they allied with the Turks again and again in the Black Sea.
     
    Poles and Turks were enemies in the late 15th century, allies in the 16th century, and at war in the 17th century.

    In the 17th century, the Poles and Ottomans fought five major wars against each other. Poles saved Europe from the Turk at Vienna, but a generation earlier a Polish-Ukrainian army had defeated an equally large Ottoman force on PLC territory.

    Historically, the closest European ally of the Ottoman Empire had been France rather than Poland.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franco-Ottoman_alliance

    The Franco-Ottoman Alliance, also known as the Franco-Turkish Alliance, was an alliance established in 1536 between the King of France Francis I and the Sultan of the Ottoman Empire Suleiman I. The strategic and sometimes tactical alliance was one of the longest-lasting and most important foreign alliances of France, and was particularly influential during the Italian Wars. The Franco-Ottoman military alliance reached its peak around 1553 during the reign Henry II of France.[1][2]

    As the first non-ideological alliance in effect between a Christian and Muslim state, the alliance attracted heavy controversy for its time and caused a scandal throughout Christendom.[3][4] Carl Jacob Burckhardt (1947) called it "the sacrilegious union of the lily and the crescent".[5] It lasted intermittently for more than two and a half centuries,[6] until the Napoleonic campaign in Ottoman Egypt, in 1798–1801.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

  602. @Anatoly Karlin
    @Mr. XYZ


    BTW, what are your thoughts on having a pro-Western post-Putin Russia join the EU in order to achieve greater economies of scale...
     
    I would support Russia joining the EU. However, Europe politically reduced to a geographic concept is Eurocentric, exclusionist, and practically racist. As with the US, I would campaign to open up membership to the Middle East, Africa, and beyond (ofc contingent on them adopting democracy, secular liberalism, feminism, LGBT rights, and so forth). While even the EU is historically regressive, to the extent that its expansion undermines the cohesion of the traditional nation-state and moves the world closer to the economies of scale it would enjoy with universal Open Borders, I support it.

    And what do you think about Garett Jones’s argument that natalism would still be relevant even in the AI age
     
    It depends on timelines. Quick AI timelines make it utterly irrelevant. The main focus should be loosening regulations in order to accelerate genomic intelligence augmentation.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Mr. XYZ

    BTW, does it strike you that for all of the things that Russians hate the US for, these things are mostly superficial other than the fact that the US entered WWI (late in the game, enough to decisively shift the war against the Germans) but didn’t subsequently help the Russians overthrow the Bolsheviks? I can understand the other Entente Powers not doing anything because they were very war-weary, but the US was much less so (in terms of its total losses) and thus was theoretically more capable of intervening, along with of course Japan (though Japan wasn’t involved in the European fighting in WWI, unlike the US).

    I guess that Russians could also hate the US for the lack of Marshall Plan aid to their country in the 1990s, but there could have potentially been quite a credible fear that this aid was going to get extensively looted without adequate safeguards and Western supervision of this aid (similar to post-war Ukrainian reconstruction aid from the West right now, actually). That, and the fear that Russia was eventually going to become hostile towards the West again anyway, which actually did turn out to be the case because the West and Russia had competing claims over spheres of influence in Ukraine and the West, as the stronger party, had no inclination to cede Ukraine to Russia (and why exactly should it have, when it makes sense for Ukraine to associate and eventually be a part of the more successful West relative to the less successful Russia?).

  603. @Mr. Hack
    @Mikhail


    Former Prime minister of #Ukraine, Yatsenyuk, “we killed our own country” pic.twitter.com/rC1mfgJagf

    Is it a fake?
     
    I don't know? Why not ask Wokechoke, our resident expert on Ukrainian and Russian Jewish politicians?

    Replies: @Mikhail

    I don’t know? Why not ask Wokechoke, our resident expert on Ukrainian and Russian Jewish politicians?

    Jewish American geopolitico Victoria Nuland might be better, recalling her support for Yats:

    Prefer Sheila Broflovski to Nuland:

    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @Mikhail

    I don't understand your sudden interest in Yatsenyuk, be it him being viewed through a prism of Wokechoke or Nuland? I reviewed his bio within Wikipedia and see that he never really was for closer cooperation with Russia, but a staunch supporter of an independent Ukraine within a European vector. So he hates "Nazis", so do most Ukrainians, his latest manifestation is somewhat perplexing, perhaps that's why you find him so interesting?

    Replies: @Mikhail

  604. @German_reader
    @songbird

    The bs about the poor, oppressed Crimean Tatars is just meant as a way to get around the fact that most of Crimea's current population is Russian or pro-Russian. Contrary to what AP asserts, it's actually the Ukrainian or pro-Ukrainian side which is playing the "muh colonialism" card and implicitly arguing that the Russians there are just colonial settlers who should leave if they don't like it.
    As for the history, really a bit much that one is apparently now expected to regard the Crimean Khanate as just some poor, innocent victim of Muscovite imperialism. But I guess there are enough Western normies who will believe it.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Mikhail, @AP

    The bs about the poor, oppressed Crimean Tatars is just meant as a way to get around the fact that most of Crimea’s current population is Russian or pro-Russian. Contrary to what AP asserts, it’s actually the Ukrainian or pro-Ukrainian side which is playing the “muh colonialism” card and implicitly arguing that the Russians there are just colonial settlers who should leave if they don’t like it.
    As for the history, really a bit much that one is apparently now expected to regard the Crimean Khanate as just some poor, innocent victim of Muscovite imperialism. But I guess there are enough Western normies who will believe it.

    With the majority of Crimea’s Ukrainians supporting that region’s reunification with Russia, to go along with the majority of Ukraine’s Crimean armed forces going over to Russia.

    On one of your points, I know a Ukrainian who said he had a cousin in the Ukrainian marines circa 1990s. His cousin was injured in a skirmish involving Crimean Tatar squatters, adding that such instances of Crimean Tatar violence weren’t covered.

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @Mikhail

    Various interesting bets being made about who has the staying power.

  605. AP says:
    @German_reader
    @songbird

    The bs about the poor, oppressed Crimean Tatars is just meant as a way to get around the fact that most of Crimea's current population is Russian or pro-Russian. Contrary to what AP asserts, it's actually the Ukrainian or pro-Ukrainian side which is playing the "muh colonialism" card and implicitly arguing that the Russians there are just colonial settlers who should leave if they don't like it.
    As for the history, really a bit much that one is apparently now expected to regard the Crimean Khanate as just some poor, innocent victim of Muscovite imperialism. But I guess there are enough Western normies who will believe it.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Mikhail, @AP

    The bs about the poor, oppressed Crimean Tatars is just meant as a way to get around the fact that most of Crimea’s current population is Russian or pro-Russian.

    It’s not bs (they were mass deported, how is it bullshit about them being oppressed?). Some Russians make some silly claims about how Crimea is ancient or core Russian territory. So I pointed out that the Russians weren’t even the largest ethnicity there until the early 20th century and not even the majority until World War II, when they mass deported the indigenous Tatars.

    Russians in Crimea are roughly analogous to Albanians in Kosovo. Except Albanians eventually became 90% of Kosovo’s population while in 2014 Russians were only about 60% of Crimea’s population.

    As for the history, really a bit much that one is apparently now expected to regard the Crimean Khanate as just some poor, innocent victim of Muscovite imperialism

    Can one also regard it as “a bit much” to regard the USSR (no less bloodthirsty, perhaps more, than the Crimean Khanate) as some poor, innocent victim of German imperialism?

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @AP

    Here’s the basic argument for Russia controlling Crimea.


    The estuary of the Don River flows into the Turkic held Azak or Slavic rename Azov Sea. The Don river is populated by many millions of Russians. The materials they export and import can be choked off and have duties imposed on it by country’s as far afield as Britain or the US if a small client state like Ukraine controlling the Crimean located Kerch Strait or the Azov Sea is willing to fire antiship missiles at their freighters and tankers. A British frigate there could have shut down 1/2 of Russia’s exports in a day.

    Historically the Turks deliberately bottled up Russian goods by holding their fort at Azov (they called it Azak) which is now Rostov on Don. The Don Cossacks sacked the Turk fort of Azov. When they took it around 2,000 Russian women and children were liberated there. There are now around 1,000,ooo Russians in Rostov on Don. The Turks then fell back on Kerch as a choke point to resume slaving and collecting taxes on goods coming and going from the Don. It’s mostly an outflow of goods and the Crim attempted to profit from being middlemen as grain factors and slavers profiting from the bounty of goods flowing out of the Russian interior. Each year the Crim raided and burned Kiev, Kharkov, Belgorod Voronezh etc. So Peter, Elizabeth and Catherine all endeavoured to make sure that only Constantinople was a customs shakedown point for Russian goods sold in the Mediterranean. It appears the Russian could live with Turks sitting on the Bosphorus Strait. But they could not tolerate that on the Don river. And certainly not at Kerch.

    All Ukraine is now doing is replicating the Giray dynasty’s role as a Turko-Mongolian cockblock on much of a Eastern Europe.


    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giray_dynasty

    The heir of the Giray dynasty Dzhezzar Pamir Giray even lives in London.


    https://twitter.com/kulanulan/status/1428133808558075904?lang=en

    Thus we get suspect events like the Jewish Maidan, the Jew King of Kiev and the Jew Coup in Rostov on Don. Maybe the British will have the current Giray arrive at Kherson as their next move on Russia. Prigozhid’s occupation of Rostov and the drive north to Moscow illustrates perfectly why the Russians are willing to spill blood to keep Crimea. It’s not a war of choice as the history suggests.

    By the way, the Russians also ejected the 100,000 Turks from Ismail at the Estuary of the Danube River. No Polish army lifted a finger to kick the Turks from the Danube’s final choke point. Izmail Which is now of course a Ukrainian city broke the Turks in Europe irrevocably. Now the Jew boy in Kiev inherits it…


    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_Izmail


    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Izmail

    The Poles have been eating out free off the Siege of Vienna and the Hussars charge for far too long. The Russians have been very good at Kebab removal along the great European rivers. The Poles vanishing as a State Entity was vital/coincidental for loosening the grip of the Turk on the Balkans, Black Sea and even Egypt? You decide.

    , @Mikhail
    @AP

    Putin/post-Soviet Russia acknowledge the wrongness of the WW II era deportation of the Crimean Tatars - something akin to how Japanese North Americans were treated.

    In contrast, the Kiev regime propped Crimean Tatar extremist Mustafa Dzhemilev advocates the ethnic cleansing of Russians:

    https://www.academia.edu/37358188/Michael_Averko_Consistency_and_Reality_Lacking_on_Crimea

    https://www.eurasiareview.com/07092018-consistency-and-reality-lacking-on-crimea-analysis/

  606. @Mr. XYZ
    @German_reader

    The best argument for Ukraine retaking Crimea is that it's internationally recognized Ukrainian territory and that Russia lost any moral claim it had to it by invading the rest of Ukraine in 2022. Debates about the Crimean Khanate are quite irrelevant here. Though FWIW, Russia was not exactly a pussycat towards Muslims back then either. The Circassian Genocide comes to mind.

    Replies: @German_reader, @Mikhail

    The best argument for Ukraine retaking Crimea is that it’s internationally recognized Ukrainian territory and that Russia lost any moral claim it had to it by invading the rest of Ukraine in 2022. Debates about the Crimean Khanate are quite irrelevant here. Though FWIW, Russia was not exactly a pussycat towards Muslims back then either. The Circassian Genocide comes to mind.

    Pre-Soviet Russia had an honored and respected Ciscassian force. There were other Circassians who took a violent unfriendly route that led to a counter-response.

  607. @Mr. XYZ
    @German_reader


    Who gives a fuck, that wasn’t relevant in Kosovo either. Ukraine forfeited its rights to Crimea and Eastern Donbass through its own policies, and if they had any sense they’d actually be glad to be rid of those regions with their pro-Russian minorities.
     
    By Western logic, Serbia forfeited its claim to Kosovo with its human rights abuses. But here Russia rather than Ukraine is the bad guy. Now, had Ukraine tried to do an Operation Storm on the Donbass, then Yes, Russia would be entitled to getting it if that's what the people there would have wanted. But Ukraine did not have any definitive such plans when Russia attacked it in 2022.

    FWIW, if I was a Ukrainian, I'd have favored letting Crimea and Donbass go before the current war. But the current war would make me reconsider my own views on this. At the very least, I'd want something big in exchange for this, such as NATO membership and (already done) a long-term pathway to EU membership. You are very much correct that those regions were not beneficial to Ukraine in a political sense, though this is less relevant now when the rest of Ukraine is so overwhelmingly hostile towards Russia. Was more relevant before the current war:

    https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/12/06/ukraine-better-without-donbass-costly-reconstruction-pro-russia-west/

    It’s the Ukrainian side which brings up that history, because Islamophile anti-colonialism sells well in the current West (at least when it’s not about Israel).
     
    But didn't the Crimean Khanate engage in slave trading? Though I suppose that Ukrainians could argue that had they not quarreled with the Poles and had the PLC not been partitioned, then it would have been the PLC rather than Russia which would have conquered the Crimean Khanate.

    Anyway, what was that word again…liberast? You really come across like the perfect embodiment. Would certainly be justified to send you to a homo concentration camp in Uganda. But on the other hand, you’re such a weirdo you might actually enjoy being brutalized by big bad negroes. So I suppose the only option is to just scroll over your logorrheic comments.
     
    I don't like big black cock lol. I prefer this BBC instead:

    https://www.bbc.com/

    Thanks for reminding me of these fake McDonald's commercials, BTW:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KOiwODsDtkw

    As for Uganda, it's quite pathetic that Africans independently recreate outdated 19th century Western moral concepts (extreme homophobia) even after Westerners themselves have long abandoned them.

    Uganda produces characters like these:

    https://twitter.com/AfricaFactsZone/status/1592280894827642880?lang=en

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Ssempa

    As a side note, I read that there was this one female Ugandan immigrant to the US that pretended to be a lesbian (even going off of birth control to reduce the risk of her being accused of sexual orientation fraud) so that she could successfully get asylum over here.

    You might enjoy this, BTW: A hot (white) date tried to engage in theft but got stopped:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VsXDUEe_9Rs

    Replies: @Coconuts

    Maybe the hostility to male homosexual activities in these African countries comes from reading the Bible.

    And/or the social construct theory about disgust over male homosexual practices is a kind of cope. Seems easy to think of evolutionary reasons for this reaction, and it not really being present for lesbianism.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @Coconuts


    Maybe the hostility to male homosexual activities in these African countries comes from reading the Bible.
     
    Yep, which further shows the poison of religion.

    And/or the social construct theory about disgust over male homosexual practices is a kind of cope. Seems easy to think of evolutionary reasons for this reaction, and it not really being present for lesbianism.
     
    Male homosexual activities carry a much higher STD risk, especially anal sex, relative to lesbian activities, no? This could help explain a greater evolutionary stigma against male homosexual activity relative to lesbianism.
  608. AP says:
    @Wokechoke
    @Mr. XYZ

    The Intermarium as Pilsudski outlined it would always favour Islamic populations as it would have required Turkish support and Tartar manpower to keep Russians out. Or at least have Turks block Russian goods out of Azov. This would have forced the Russians to trade over land with Polish markups and customs stations.

    The Commonwealth repeatedly sides with the Khans in Crimea and The Golden Horde and was effectively on the same side as Istanbul several times.

    One detail that we don’t talk about viz the Napoleonic Invasion of Russia is that Poles took part in huge numbers. Additionally the Russians had been locked in combat with the Ottomans for the better part of 25 years when Napoleon struck. The Russo-Turkish war concluded a few months before Napoleon and his Poles invaded. That’s de facto alliance with the Turks. The Poles have been trying to live rent free over assisting the Viennese in 1688 but conveniently airbrush out how they allied with the Turks again and again in the Black Sea.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russo-Turkish_War_(1806–1812)


    Besides this war fought by Russia to boot out the Turks on the Danube once and for all, The Swedish King Carolus had to hide out in the Ottoman Empire after he shit the bed in Ukraine’s Poltava against Peter the Great earlier in the war Great Northern War.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Northern_War

    This stuff you claim about the presence of Muslims is specious. AP has fuck all to say about Bosnia or Albania. Nothing to say about Turkey being in NATO either.

    Replies: @AP

    Congratulations on having some of the most retarded takes of anyone here.

    The Poles have been trying to live rent free over assisting the Viennese in 1688 but conveniently airbrush out how they allied with the Turks again and again in the Black Sea.

    Poles and Turks were enemies in the late 15th century, allies in the 16th century, and at war in the 17th century.

    In the 17th century, the Poles and Ottomans fought five major wars against each other. Poles saved Europe from the Turk at Vienna, but a generation earlier a Polish-Ukrainian army had defeated an equally large Ottoman force on PLC territory.

    Historically, the closest European ally of the Ottoman Empire had been France rather than Poland.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franco-Ottoman_alliance

    The Franco-Ottoman Alliance, also known as the Franco-Turkish Alliance, was an alliance established in 1536 between the King of France Francis I and the Sultan of the Ottoman Empire Suleiman I. The strategic and sometimes tactical alliance was one of the longest-lasting and most important foreign alliances of France, and was particularly influential during the Italian Wars. The Franco-Ottoman military alliance reached its peak around 1553 during the reign Henry II of France.[1][2]

    As the first non-ideological alliance in effect between a Christian and Muslim state, the alliance attracted heavy controversy for its time and caused a scandal throughout Christendom.[3][4] Carl Jacob Burckhardt (1947) called it “the sacrilegious union of the lily and the crescent”.[5] It lasted intermittently for more than two and a half centuries,[6] until the Napoleonic campaign in Ottoman Egypt, in 1798–1801.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @AP


    Historically, the closest European ally of the Ottoman Empire had been France rather than Poland.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franco-Ottoman_alliance

    The Franco-Ottoman Alliance, also known as the Franco-Turkish Alliance, was an alliance established in 1536 between the King of France Francis I and the Sultan of the Ottoman Empire Suleiman I. The strategic and sometimes tactical alliance was one of the longest-lasting and most important foreign alliances of France, and was particularly influential during the Italian Wars. The Franco-Ottoman military alliance reached its peak around 1553 during the reign Henry II of France.[1][2]

    As the first non-ideological alliance in effect between a Christian and Muslim state, the alliance attracted heavy controversy for its time and caused a scandal throughout Christendom.[3][4] Carl Jacob Burckhardt (1947) called it “the sacrilegious union of the lily and the crescent”.[5] It lasted intermittently for more than two and a half centuries,[6] until the Napoleonic campaign in Ottoman Egypt, in 1798–1801.
     
    France seems to have been eager to seek alliances with countries at Europe's periphery: The Ottoman Empire, Russia, Poland, Czechoslovakia, Romania, Yugoslavia.

    Centuries beforehand, Franks (albeit less France itself) played a large role in fighting the Crusades in the Near East.

    Replies: @Sean

  609. AP says:
    @songbird
    @Wokechoke

    It may be that AP is a crypto-Turk who boosts Austria-Hungary and the Intermarium, as a cloak and disguise.

    The dismemberment of the Ottoman Empire would neatly explain his dislike of nationalism.
    https://twitter.com/mmjukic/status/1673386691241951239?s=20

    Replies: @German_reader, @Mr. XYZ, @AP

    It may be that AP is a crypto-Turk who boosts Austria-Hungary and the Intermarium, as a cloak and disguise.

    Well, according to pan-Turkic nationalists, all Ukrainians are crypto-Turks. I had a friend in university about 30 years ago, from one of the ex-Soviet Turkic republics who was really into this idea, we had such a drunken geopolitical discussion. He was proclaiming that we are all Turks really, and that the Russians are our mutual enemies. He was a nephew of his country’s president, and is now a high ranking government official, I am glad that his country supports Ukraine, such fantasies among Turks may be useful 🙂

    And according to early modern Polish Sarmatists, all Polish nobles were crypto-Turks (they believed that they were descended from Sarmatians, and back then it was falsely believed that Sarmatians were Turkic people – we now know that Sarmatians were Iranic rather than Turkic). And this was at the time when Poles were always at war with the Turks. They thought of the conflict as religious more than ethnic.

    But in reality, I am less of a crypto-Turk than “wokechoke” is a crypto-Jew.

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @AP

    When was Poland continuously at war with Turkey?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Russo-Turkish_wars

    While the Russians were battling it out with the Turks from Ivan Grozny to Peter the Great era through Elizabeth to Catherine and finally Alexander and Nicholas where were these Poles again?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish–Ottoman_War_(1672–1676)

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish–Ottoman_War_(1683–1699)

    There’s around 30 years of kinetic contact. That’s about it.

    Compared to this…

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Russo-Turkish_wars

    400 years of fighting the Turks around the Black Sea and the Danube and Volga Rivers.


    What were the Poles doing as the Russians finally ejected the Turk from the northern rim of the Black Sea? Oh that’s right, preparing an all out assault on Moscow in cahoots with Napoleon.

    Replies: @AP

    , @Ivashka the fool
    @AP


    Sarmatians, and back then it was falsely believed that Sarmatians were Turkic people – we now know that Sarmatians were Iranic rather than Turkic)
     
    Аорс» (сарматское племя). От искаженного тюркского этнонима «орус»/ «урус». Среди сарматов были также тюркские племена — турки, гар — гары, онгары, дондары, камаки (кимаки, кумыки) и др. (Гейбуллаев, 1991, с. 336).

    http://grozan.ru/kavkaz-2/istoriya-balkarii-i-karachaya/sarmaty-i-gunny-predki-tyurkskix-narodov/

    Urus was later used by Turkic speaking peoples as an ethnonym for Rus. Moslem traders on Volga (Itil), who described their meeting with the early Rus, described them as being Turkic, also one should remember the Rus Khaganate and the fact that the Rurikid falling falcon (the Ukrainian Trizub) is actually a Tamga. One must also be aware that the Sargat Valley culture, which in its earliest form is seen as connected to early Sarmatians, is also connected to Eastern Scythians who became Turkic and their proto-Hungarian Uralic allies. The ancient Rus and the Magyar got along remarkably well. The ethnogenesis of the Eurasian Steppe nomadic confederations is quite convoluted. I know that you firmly believe in the Viking Rus hypothesis, but fact is the Moslem traders on Volga did unambiguously put them among the Turkic tribes. Perhaps because at the time they were the Khazar river fleet mercenaries and that their dress, haircut and tattoos were typically Turkic / Eastern Scythian.

    , @songbird
    @AP

    IMO, Roxelana alone would make Ukraine a shoe-in for observer status in the OTS. I understand she is a very popular figure in Turkish soaps.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

  610. @Mr. XYZ
    @Anatoly Karlin


    I would support Russia joining the EU. However, Europe politically reduced to a geographic concept is Eurocentric, exclusionist, and practically racist. As with the US, I would campaign to open up membership to the Middle East, Africa, and beyond (ofc contingent on them adopting democracy, secular liberalism, feminism, LGBT rights, and so forth). While even the EU is historically regressive, to the extent that its expansion undermines the cohesion of the traditional nation-state and moves the world closer to the economies of scale it would enjoy with universal Open Borders, I support it.
     
    If one wants greater economies of scale, why not support pro-natalism as well? That also produces larger economies of scale. And possibly of better quality than with open borders. If you're saying that AI makes natalism irrelevant, then why exactly does it not make immigration irrelevant as well? Mass-producing super-smart AI strikes me as a much better way of achieving greater economies of scale than importing non-culturally-compatible working-class Third Worlders, don't you think? It won't turn much of the West into a dump, after all. (Advocating turning the West into a dump while not intending to subsequently stay in the West to deal with the results of the mess that you helped create strikes me as being awfully disgraceful.)

    If AI will also produce a cure to aging, then this will also eventually reach the Third World, in which case Third Worlders would have the luxury of waiting until their countries become rich rather than seeking to immigrate to the First World en masse. And sufficiently smart AI can make even the Third World rich very quickly, no? It would produce an extremely massive smart fraction gain even for those countries, no? (Since the West and/or East Asia will eventually bring its AI over to the Third World as well, right?)

    BTW, having Third World countries embrace Western values and Western concepts and norms is going to be quite a challenge. Turkey is pretty secular by Muslim standards and yet it is still very far from getting EU membership. Latin America embraces a lot of Western values but is unfortunately notoriously homicidal--so, not ready for EU membership even if offered. And the rest of the Third World is much less culturally compatible with the EU at this point in time, other than perhaps their cognitive elites.

    It depends on timelines. Quick AI timelines make it utterly irrelevant. The main focus should be loosening regulations in order to accelerate genomic intelligence augmentation.
     
    Wouldn't quick AI timelines make genomic intelligence augmentation "utterly irrelevant" as well? After all, why upgrade humans when you already have super-smart AI doing all of the difficult thinking and analyzing for humans?

    BTW, do you acknowledge that Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine was a huge mistake since it denied tens/hundreds of thousands of people the chance to get access to anti-aging technology by getting killed prematurely* and also due to the fact that quick AI timelines would make any Russian gains from a conquest of Ukraine quite irrelevant since there's no way in Hell that a couple dozen million average 95 IQ Eastern Slavs are going to be able to compete with super-smart AI in the long-run (and since Russia is not a world leader in AI in any case)? Russia would have been much better off not getting involved in Ukraine in 2022, or even in 2014, for that matter, and instead maintained its good ties with the West (and with China as well), gotten easy access to super-smart AI, and then re-programmed this AI to identify as Ukrainians and to be loyal to Russia. Seems more prudent and more effective, no? Seriously. The IQ of super-smart AI is going to be much higher than 95 or 110 or even 160, after all.

    *And I don't think that you can really blame the West for aiding Ukraine and thus prolonging the war unless you also want to blame Russia for aiding Serbia in 1914 and thus making WWI much, much bloodier than it would have otherwise been since Russia transformed a local Austro-Serbian war into a World War. If Serbs in 1914 were actually interested in saving their own people's lives to the maximum extent/degree possible, then they should have *unconditionally* accepted Austria-Hungary's ultimatum *in its entirety* (however unfair and unjust they might have considered it to be) and also quickly surrendered to Austria-Hungary if Austria-Hungary would have subsequently invaded Serbia anyway.

    BTW, off-topic, but in regards to a one-world government, even one noted supporter of open borders (Ilya Somin) has pointed out that a one-world government can result in a global tyranny with no exit options:

    https://fee.org/articles/a-cosmopolitan-case-against-world-government/

    He, of course, supports government in general being as small as possible due to him being a libertarian.

    Ultimately, though, the biggest criticism of open borders, and the most effective one, is that the effects of open borders cannot be reversed short of mass expulsions/ethnic cleansing or worse. This is similar to what @HeTows on Twitter told me about Israeli Jews: Most of them prefer neither, but if forced to choose, they would prefer religious Jewish fascists over a one-state solution because the odds of religious Jewish fascists and/or their descendants eventually secularizing are much higher than the odds of Arabs converting en masse to Judaism after replacing Jews as the majority ethnic group in Israel. Very cynical but true.

    Replies: @Anatoly Karlin

    If one wants greater economies of scale, why not support pro-natalism as well?

    There is no such thing as “Western values” (claims otherwise are chauvinist). There are values embraced by elite human capital (EHC) and all societies converge to them as EHC wins argument after argument.

    Natalism is implicitly anti-feminist. EHC rejects natalism. However, EHC is much more open to positive eugenics.

    AIs are good but potentially dangerous. A biosingularity is safer.

    Advocating turning the West into a dump while not intending to subsequently stay in the West to deal with the results of the mess that you helped create strikes me as being awfully disgraceful.

    EHC laughs at the idea of feeling some attachment to arbitray scraps of land, LOL.

    EHC doesn’t fear competition. It thrives wherever it goes. If parts of the world landscape known as Western becomes dumps, EHC is free to create its own functional communities elsewhere, including in the Third World.

    BTW, off-topic, but in regards to a one-world government, even one noted supporter of open borders (Ilya Somin) has pointed out that a one-world government can result in a global tyranny with no exit options

    The main point is to collapse all existing nation-states along with Open Borders simultaneously. The organizing principle would be network states that own parcels of land in different areas of the world, secured on decentralized blockchain.

    BTW, do you acknowledge that Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine was a huge mistake since it denied tens/hundreds of thousands of people the chance to get access to anti-aging technology by getting killed prematurely…

    Yes, it was obviously a glaring demonstration of the total bankruptcy of nationalism and right-wing conservatism and associated EHC-uncompliant ideologies, and a strong signal that the world would be better off without them.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @Anatoly Karlin


    There is no such thing as “Western values” (claims otherwise are chauvinist). There are values embraced by elite human capital (EHC) and all societies converge to them as EHC wins argument after argument.
     
    Elite human capital supported Communism a century ago, no? Yet Communists never gained power in the West and the countries where Communists did gain power turned into relative dumps.

    Your logic is similar to Lenin's from a century ago: "We (elite human capital) know what's best, so who the fuck cares what the proles think? They voted for the SRs? Too bad, they can suck it up! We know better than they do! We won the urban vote, and the cities lead the countryside in terms of social progress!"

    Natalism is implicitly anti-feminist.
     
    Won't be anti-feminist with artificial wombs. They and realistic sex dolls will make real women partially redundant, for that matter. Could also help minor-attracted persons by giving them a realistic outlet for their sex drives that does not involve actually harming anyone (child sex dolls, or child sex robots with AI programming to give them a childlike personality, other than in regards to sex, where they will have an adult-like mentality and understanding of consent).

    EHC rejects natalism.
     
    The EHC who are anti-natalists are selecting themselves out of the gene pool:

    https://emilkirkegaard.dk/en/2022/06/new-study-out-will-intelligent-latter-day-saints-and-smart-conservatives-inherit-the-earth/

    https://emilkirkegaard.dk/en/wp-content/uploads/dysgenics-mormons-2048x1331.png

    https://emilkirkegaard.dk/en/wp-content/uploads/dysgenics-politics-2048x1331.jpeg

    In the future, there could be more smart conservatives relative to smart liberals unless liberals will successfully win over enough smart conservatives with new arguments each and every generation. This could bode very well for the alt-center.

    However, EHC is much more open to positive eugenics.

    However, EHC is much more open to positive eugenics.
     
    If smart people don't want to breed at all, good luck getting them to breed eugenically!

    AIs are good but potentially dangerous. A biosingularity is safer.
     
    And encouraging smart people to reproduce more does not help make a biosingularity likelier? At least in a relative sense, due to it making fertility more eugenic than it would have otherwise been?

    EHC laughs at the idea of feeling some attachment to arbitray scraps of land, LOL.
     
    Those arbitrary scraps of land and their people have achieved a lot.

    For that matter, why bother respecting private property? It also often has a history of force and coercion behind it if you go back far enough, just like nation-states have. Even if one acquired one's private property fairly, someone far enough back down the line possibly did not do so, thus arguably making your own claim on this private property illegitimate as well.

    EHC doesn’t fear competition. It thrives wherever it goes. If parts of the world landscape known as Western becomes dumps, EHC is free to create its own functional communities elsewhere, including in the Third World.
     
    Good luck creating your own states and keeping low human capital out. Third World countries aren't very tolerant of secession, and if EHC will be keeping low human capital out of their new communities, then they will be accused of hypocrisy over their previous open borders stance.

    The main point is to collapse all existing nation-states along with Open Borders simultaneously. The organizing principle would be network states that own parcels of land in different areas of the world, secured on decentralized blockchain.
     
    Network states have existed throughout history and yet they didn't completely eliminate nation-states. You don't think that the Roman Catholic Church is a network state, for instance? Or the Jesuits? Or Latin American drug cartels? Or the mafia? In the first couple of cases, they even had their own centers of learning and education (universities and monasteries) which were used to facilitate a lot of elite science production in the pre-modern era, no?

    Also, are ordinary people actually going to benefit from network states or is it only going to be for the elites? Because how exactly are you and/or EHC supposed to get ordinary people to support your little idea here if it doesn't actually benefit them in any way whatsoever?

    Yes, it was obviously a glaring demonstration of the total bankruptcy of nationalism and right-wing conservatism and associated EHC-uncompliant ideologies, and a strong signal that the world would be better off without them.
     
    And you couldn't have reached this conclusion before the start of that war? Before over 100,000 people needlessly lost their lives?

    Russian EHC (such as atheists) were considerably more skeptical of the Ukraine invasion than Russia's population at large was (atheists were 50-50 on the invasion, Orthodox Christians overwhelmingly in favor), and yet back when you thought that Russia still had a chance of winning, you ignored the opinion of Russian EHC and instead supported the opinion of Russian proles. What made you so cavalierly dismiss the opinion of Russian EHC back then?

    Replies: @Anatoly Karlin

    , @Mr. XYZ
    @Anatoly Karlin

    Out of curiosity: How do you intend to convince, say, a Canadian that your (or EHC's) proposed immigration policy is better than what Canada currently has? Canada accepts huge numbers of immigrants, especially per capita, each year, but does so with a focus on cognitive elites and their families (though there are also some refugees). If Canada--or any other Western country--will implement a UBI, wouldn't the size of this UBI depend on just how productive these countries are actually going to be per capita? Or is super-smart AI going to make productivity increase so much that the GDP per capita of Western countries is likely going to be in the millions of US dollars, if not in the tens of millions of US dollars, even if they are flooded with low-IQ immigrants by the hundreds of millions of more?

    If it's the latter scenario, then the West could potentially accept huge numbers of Third Worlders. Though there would still be issues with voting (super-smart AI won't be able to vote, right?), crime, and terrorism to consider. The crime part I guess can be somewhat dealt with by encouraging *voluntary* segregation and freedom of association, though good luck selling that to a Woke and anti-racist public. The terrorism issue is not a problem in a statistical sense per se but is a problem when it comes to murdering people who do things that noticeably provoke Muslims, such as engaging in "Islamophobic" speech. Another reason to be very selective about whom one is importing from the Muslim world and importing only Muslim reformists and Muslim cognitive elites and not low-IQ Muslim rightoids. Not everyone can live in a gated community or afford to hire great personal security 24/7, after all. As it is, Ayaan Hirsi Ali (a survivor of Muslim female genital mutilation) and a vehement critic of various backwards Islamic practices had to move from the Netherlands to the US because the security situation for her was better in the US relative to the Netherlands (less problematic Muslim population, for one).

    BTW, even applying out own logic about arbitrary scraps of land: There should be no problem with Ukraine ethnically cleansing Crimea and Donbass just so long as no one is killed, right? After all, these people can be resettled elsewhere, right? Crimea and Donbass are just arbitrary scraps of land, after all. So, why prolong the war over them?

    Replies: @Anatoly Karlin, @Mr. XYZ

    , @Emil Nikola Richard
    @Anatoly Karlin

    Elite human capital =~ chickensh|t cock $uckers.

    There are plenty of humans they cannot defeat or frighten unless they blow up nuclear bombs and themselves.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P3KCw2eIbVM&ab_channel=AtticusReads

    , @Yevardian
    @Anatoly Karlin


    Natalism is implicitly anti-feminist. EHC rejects natalism. However, EHC is much more open to positive eugenics.

    AIs are good but potentially dangerous. A biosingularity is safer.
     

    Alright with woke-incel 'It' latest Karlin-brand returning, its finally too much. Mental illness online is only tolerable when you can't picture the person behind it.
    With the increasing Jews-manipulating-my-bowels posting, the HBD/haplogroup circlejerks, redditposters and XYZ's spam, I'm following AnonFromTN and taking an indefinite break from this asylum again.
    Regards to Barbarossa, Bashibuzuk/Ivashka, Dmitry, Gerard, G_R, Mikel etc.

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @German_reader

    , @Mr. XYZ
    @Anatoly Karlin


    There is no such thing as “Western values” (claims otherwise are chauvinist).
     
    Western values are those values which Westerners embrace, especially but not only their EHC. Democracy good, LGBTQ+ rights good, free speech good, free expression good, totalitarianism bad (unless perhaps it's Woke, unfortunately), conquering unwilling countries is bad, et cetera.
  611. @AP
    @German_reader


    The bs about the poor, oppressed Crimean Tatars is just meant as a way to get around the fact that most of Crimea’s current population is Russian or pro-Russian.
     
    It's not bs (they were mass deported, how is it bullshit about them being oppressed?). Some Russians make some silly claims about how Crimea is ancient or core Russian territory. So I pointed out that the Russians weren't even the largest ethnicity there until the early 20th century and not even the majority until World War II, when they mass deported the indigenous Tatars.

    Russians in Crimea are roughly analogous to Albanians in Kosovo. Except Albanians eventually became 90% of Kosovo's population while in 2014 Russians were only about 60% of Crimea's population.

    As for the history, really a bit much that one is apparently now expected to regard the Crimean Khanate as just some poor, innocent victim of Muscovite imperialism
     
    Can one also regard it as "a bit much" to regard the USSR (no less bloodthirsty, perhaps more, than the Crimean Khanate) as some poor, innocent victim of German imperialism?

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @Mikhail

    Here’s the basic argument for Russia controlling Crimea.

    The estuary of the Don River flows into the Turkic held Azak or Slavic rename Azov Sea. The Don river is populated by many millions of Russians. The materials they export and import can be choked off and have duties imposed on it by country’s as far afield as Britain or the US if a small client state like Ukraine controlling the Crimean located Kerch Strait or the Azov Sea is willing to fire antiship missiles at their freighters and tankers. A British frigate there could have shut down 1/2 of Russia’s exports in a day.

    Historically the Turks deliberately bottled up Russian goods by holding their fort at Azov (they called it Azak) which is now Rostov on Don. The Don Cossacks sacked the Turk fort of Azov. When they took it around 2,000 Russian women and children were liberated there. There are now around 1,000,ooo Russians in Rostov on Don. The Turks then fell back on Kerch as a choke point to resume slaving and collecting taxes on goods coming and going from the Don. It’s mostly an outflow of goods and the Crim attempted to profit from being middlemen as grain factors and slavers profiting from the bounty of goods flowing out of the Russian interior. Each year the Crim raided and burned Kiev, Kharkov, Belgorod Voronezh etc. So Peter, Elizabeth and Catherine all endeavoured to make sure that only Constantinople was a customs shakedown point for Russian goods sold in the Mediterranean. It appears the Russian could live with Turks sitting on the Bosphorus Strait. But they could not tolerate that on the Don river. And certainly not at Kerch.

    All Ukraine is now doing is replicating the Giray dynasty’s role as a Turko-Mongolian cockblock on much of a Eastern Europe.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giray_dynasty

    The heir of the Giray dynasty Dzhezzar Pamir Giray even lives in London.

    Thus we get suspect events like the Jewish Maidan, the Jew King of Kiev and the Jew Coup in Rostov on Don. Maybe the British will have the current Giray arrive at Kherson as their next move on Russia. Prigozhid’s occupation of Rostov and the drive north to Moscow illustrates perfectly why the Russians are willing to spill blood to keep Crimea. It’s not a war of choice as the history suggests.

    By the way, the Russians also ejected the 100,000 Turks from Ismail at the Estuary of the Danube River. No Polish army lifted a finger to kick the Turks from the Danube’s final choke point. Izmail Which is now of course a Ukrainian city broke the Turks in Europe irrevocably. Now the Jew boy in Kiev inherits it…

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_Izmail

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Izmail

    The Poles have been eating out free off the Siege of Vienna and the Hussars charge for far too long. The Russians have been very good at Kebab removal along the great European rivers. The Poles vanishing as a State Entity was vital/coincidental for loosening the grip of the Turk on the Balkans, Black Sea and even Egypt? You decide.

  612. @Coconuts
    @Mr. XYZ

    Maybe the hostility to male homosexual activities in these African countries comes from reading the Bible.

    And/or the social construct theory about disgust over male homosexual practices is a kind of cope. Seems easy to think of evolutionary reasons for this reaction, and it not really being present for lesbianism.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    Maybe the hostility to male homosexual activities in these African countries comes from reading the Bible.

    Yep, which further shows the poison of religion.

    And/or the social construct theory about disgust over male homosexual practices is a kind of cope. Seems easy to think of evolutionary reasons for this reaction, and it not really being present for lesbianism.

    Male homosexual activities carry a much higher STD risk, especially anal sex, relative to lesbian activities, no? This could help explain a greater evolutionary stigma against male homosexual activity relative to lesbianism.

  613. @Anatoly Karlin
    @Mr. XYZ


    If one wants greater economies of scale, why not support pro-natalism as well?
     
    There is no such thing as "Western values" (claims otherwise are chauvinist). There are values embraced by elite human capital (EHC) and all societies converge to them as EHC wins argument after argument.

    Natalism is implicitly anti-feminist. EHC rejects natalism. However, EHC is much more open to positive eugenics.

    AIs are good but potentially dangerous. A biosingularity is safer.

    Advocating turning the West into a dump while not intending to subsequently stay in the West to deal with the results of the mess that you helped create strikes me as being awfully disgraceful.
     
    EHC laughs at the idea of feeling some attachment to arbitray scraps of land, LOL.

    EHC doesn't fear competition. It thrives wherever it goes. If parts of the world landscape known as Western becomes dumps, EHC is free to create its own functional communities elsewhere, including in the Third World.

    BTW, off-topic, but in regards to a one-world government, even one noted supporter of open borders (Ilya Somin) has pointed out that a one-world government can result in a global tyranny with no exit options
     
    The main point is to collapse all existing nation-states along with Open Borders simultaneously. The organizing principle would be network states that own parcels of land in different areas of the world, secured on decentralized blockchain.

    BTW, do you acknowledge that Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine was a huge mistake since it denied tens/hundreds of thousands of people the chance to get access to anti-aging technology by getting killed prematurely...
     
    Yes, it was obviously a glaring demonstration of the total bankruptcy of nationalism and right-wing conservatism and associated EHC-uncompliant ideologies, and a strong signal that the world would be better off without them.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Mr. XYZ, @Emil Nikola Richard, @Yevardian, @Mr. XYZ

    There is no such thing as “Western values” (claims otherwise are chauvinist). There are values embraced by elite human capital (EHC) and all societies converge to them as EHC wins argument after argument.

    Elite human capital supported Communism a century ago, no? Yet Communists never gained power in the West and the countries where Communists did gain power turned into relative dumps.

    Your logic is similar to Lenin’s from a century ago: “We (elite human capital) know what’s best, so who the fuck cares what the proles think? They voted for the SRs? Too bad, they can suck it up! We know better than they do! We won the urban vote, and the cities lead the countryside in terms of social progress!”

    Natalism is implicitly anti-feminist.

    Won’t be anti-feminist with artificial wombs. They and realistic sex dolls will make real women partially redundant, for that matter. Could also help minor-attracted persons by giving them a realistic outlet for their sex drives that does not involve actually harming anyone (child sex dolls, or child sex robots with AI programming to give them a childlike personality, other than in regards to sex, where they will have an adult-like mentality and understanding of consent).

    EHC rejects natalism.

    The EHC who are anti-natalists are selecting themselves out of the gene pool:

    https://emilkirkegaard.dk/en/2022/06/new-study-out-will-intelligent-latter-day-saints-and-smart-conservatives-inherit-the-earth/

    In the future, there could be more smart conservatives relative to smart liberals unless liberals will successfully win over enough smart conservatives with new arguments each and every generation. This could bode very well for the alt-center.

    However, EHC is much more open to positive eugenics.

    However, EHC is much more open to positive eugenics.

    If smart people don’t want to breed at all, good luck getting them to breed eugenically!

    AIs are good but potentially dangerous. A biosingularity is safer.

    And encouraging smart people to reproduce more does not help make a biosingularity likelier? At least in a relative sense, due to it making fertility more eugenic than it would have otherwise been?

    EHC laughs at the idea of feeling some attachment to arbitray scraps of land, LOL.

    Those arbitrary scraps of land and their people have achieved a lot.

    For that matter, why bother respecting private property? It also often has a history of force and coercion behind it if you go back far enough, just like nation-states have. Even if one acquired one’s private property fairly, someone far enough back down the line possibly did not do so, thus arguably making your own claim on this private property illegitimate as well.

    EHC doesn’t fear competition. It thrives wherever it goes. If parts of the world landscape known as Western becomes dumps, EHC is free to create its own functional communities elsewhere, including in the Third World.

    Good luck creating your own states and keeping low human capital out. Third World countries aren’t very tolerant of secession, and if EHC will be keeping low human capital out of their new communities, then they will be accused of hypocrisy over their previous open borders stance.

    The main point is to collapse all existing nation-states along with Open Borders simultaneously. The organizing principle would be network states that own parcels of land in different areas of the world, secured on decentralized blockchain.

    Network states have existed throughout history and yet they didn’t completely eliminate nation-states. You don’t think that the Roman Catholic Church is a network state, for instance? Or the Jesuits? Or Latin American drug cartels? Or the mafia? In the first couple of cases, they even had their own centers of learning and education (universities and monasteries) which were used to facilitate a lot of elite science production in the pre-modern era, no?

    Also, are ordinary people actually going to benefit from network states or is it only going to be for the elites? Because how exactly are you and/or EHC supposed to get ordinary people to support your little idea here if it doesn’t actually benefit them in any way whatsoever?

    Yes, it was obviously a glaring demonstration of the total bankruptcy of nationalism and right-wing conservatism and associated EHC-uncompliant ideologies, and a strong signal that the world would be better off without them.

    And you couldn’t have reached this conclusion before the start of that war? Before over 100,000 people needlessly lost their lives?

    Russian EHC (such as atheists) were considerably more skeptical of the Ukraine invasion than Russia’s population at large was (atheists were 50-50 on the invasion, Orthodox Christians overwhelmingly in favor), and yet back when you thought that Russia still had a chance of winning, you ignored the opinion of Russian EHC and instead supported the opinion of Russian proles. What made you so cavalierly dismiss the opinion of Russian EHC back then?

    • Replies: @Anatoly Karlin
    @Mr. XYZ


    Elite human capital supported Communism a century ago, no?
     
    No.

    For that matter, why bother respecting private property?
     
    To not get arrested and imprisoned. Absence of centralized states does not imply absence of laws or regulations on particular territories.

    Third World countries aren’t very tolerant of secession, and if EHC will be keeping low human capital out of their new communities, then they will be accused of hypocrisy over their previous open borders stance.

    Crypto adoption is more advanced in the Third World in large part because there is a greater need for trustless systems.

    Their states are weaker too.

    I am bullish on the prospects for network states in the Third World. Montenegro, Uruguay, Honduras, El Salvador are lighting are way.

    Network states have existed throughout history and yet they didn’t completely eliminate nation-states.
     
    They existed in worlds in which tools for decentralized governance were non-existent. That is no longer the case.

    And you couldn’t have reached this conclusion before the start of that war? Before over 100,000 people needlessly lost their lives?

    The old models had to be invalidated. It is sad that East Slavs are again the main subjects, as with Communism, but such is the will of history.

    What made you so cavalierly dismiss the opinion of Russian EHC back then?
     
    The hostility of EHC to Russian nationalism and patriotism always nagged at me. I assumed it was a delusion, like their greater aversion to HBD, and had documented many specific instances in which they were simply factually wrong about Russia.

    However, in the generalities, EHC were roundly vindicated.

    This also implies they are correct broadly on pro-immigration, anti-racism, feminism, LGBT, Wokeness, etc., if not on some specifics.

    EHC will not be contained. 💯

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Mr. XYZ

  614. @LatW
    @sudden death

    Typical Luka. :) Too funny. "Here's a camp with a fence where you can live, here's a plot where you can grow some potatoes". LOL

    Of course, he doesn't want them there. He likes "sovereignty". :) The Belarusian military probably don't like them all that much either.

    They may split them up and disperse them into different units. But the Wagnerites probably won't like it. I wonder if they have run out of money, apparently they found millions of dollars & roubles in cash and gold bars on Prigo, as well as fake passports, I wonder if they confiscated all that. Who knows if he was going to share that with all his mercs or just take it and bail (as a Plan B if the "coup" didn't work).

    According to Osechkin from Gulagu.net, all those "businesses" they have in Africa are connected to the very top (Kovalchuk, Timchenko, Putin). So they do rely on Wagner to police it there. This is apparently the reason why they have not yet eliminated them (they could've easily done it in Ukraine, if they had wanted to).

    But Prigo apparently flew to St Pete again.

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @QCIC

    Apparently Belarus is number one in per capita potato consumption.

    • Replies: @LatW
    @Emil Nikola Richard


    Apparently Belarus is number one in per capita potato consumption.
     
    Nothing wrong with that, I was just trying to make a joke about how Luka, this old fox, so often talks as if he is some simple country dude (which in combination with his hick-like accent comes off somewhat believable - and totally chad-like).

    Yea, nothing special here, just a few Wagnerites living in that Soviet era high rise next door. :) These fine fellows have been on a couple of tours in Syria and in Donbass, other than that they are totally normal. :)


    If it has nothing better to do than post here is that really a bad development?
     
    And you gotta admit that it is pretty creative to pronounce oneself as "post-masculine" while a draft is taking place. A fantastic way out. "I'm post-masculine, do not count me in" - priceless. Might be even more effective than throwing Molotov cocktails at army recruitment centers. From what I've heard, back in the Soviet times, one had to go to great lengths to "prove" that one is "crazy" or mentally unstable, in order to avoid military service. But these days claiming you're "post-masculine" may not be considered crazy or a mental condition. So may or may not work.

    And, by the way, how is "elite human capital" defined? Cognitive elites is understandable, but EHC sounds like it could be something much, much broader. What about beautiful but average IQ people? What about super smart and quirky people who are not conscientious enough to follow all social norms but are otherwise fantastic people? What about crazy artists? What about mediocre and spoiled offspring of cognitive elites (even eugenics and perfect parenting doesn't guarantee an ideal outcome)? Etc, etc. How is this EHC really defined?

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Coconuts, @Emil Nikola Richard

  615. @Dmitry
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms


    “Oriental governmental structure” imply that it’s dictorial is a false premise.

     

    Yes you are repeating what I wrote.

    Russia far more expansionary,

     

    If you excluded the Soviet times, Russia is less more expansionary than USA, Brazil. Less expansionary than USA, as when Cossacks move in the border it's not ideological, but a practical need to move outside of law. The government also has expand over the border zone to secure the areas which are already settled, including from Russian rebels. It's mainly only in the Soviet times when there is really decisions to settle most of this land.

    In postsoviet time, the country is now reducing again, they allow half the country to decay and depopulate, so the model will be some megacities closer to each other in the center. A lot of the problems in Russia, are actually because it's not really expansionary and there isn't interest for investing in more than half of the country or even a lot of the sense they don't want to continue a lot of the country.

    It was only a Soviet time of seventy years when there was ideological justification to be expansionary. While USA had expansionary ideology for over two hundred years now.

    ike alot of self-loathing Chinese ethnics–
     
    Perhaps superficially, but this comment is a sign of ignorance. It's like someone says "HP imports its software". And you will write, "you sound like one of those self-hating developers at Microsoft, who says they don't develop inhouse, because the original Windows was inspired by Xerox".

    To compare to China in this topic, is one of the most bizarre comparisons. China develops culture inhouse for thousands of years. In Russia, the culture and operating systems are imported for a thousand years, if you include ancestor states of Russia.

    There is also a native Russia culture the modifications to the imported culture, however I don't anyone here understands enough about the culture, at least in relation to Europe to discuss this.

    I tried to talk about Rachmaninov to Bashibuzuk a few times, but he will just disappear if the discussion becomes a serious one, which is not something Soviet.

    geo-historical reasons for this, both northern China and Russia lie on flat terrains so prone to invasions.

     

    You couldn't compare two different countries, of China and Russia, which are more different in terms of the cultural autonomy or independence. China is an example of culture manufacturer, old center, while Russia is culture importer and slave colony model.

    China and Russia are one of the most different countries in this area. This topic has no relation to "flat terrains so prone to invasions." Russia, Brazil and USA have defeated invasions for a lot longer than inhouse culture producer countries like France or Germany.

    Prigozhin boasted about marching to Moscow in x hours, you can only do that because there’s not an Alps or English Channel in between.

     

    It seems like you are writing a muddled comment, with no relation to the topic. The reason? Because you want to talk about China and are not interested about learning about Russia.

    "Wagner" was internal conflict of elites, with a popular group, while the army is in Ukraine. It's not related to the flat terrain in Russia. The military doesn't shoot against Wagner.

    You can't invade Russia from Poland like this as there is the Russian army. Also, Russia has the world's largest number of nuclear weapons. If there is any country which you wouldn't invade. This part of the reason Putin can behave aggressively with the postsoviet border conflict in Ukraine, because he knows there is no threat of invasion from the external countries including China.

    incubation for high-end niche industries availing scientific investments. Germany cannot

     

    I'm not writing anywhere about scaling Switzerland. But the comments about scaling are about countries/territory with the English systems as a result of the information transfer in the late British empire, Bermuda, Hong Kong, Singapore, Israel, Australia, New Zealand, Australia.

    Generally, the countries with smaller populations are working better, so sure there will be at some time reduction of results with scaling.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    Because you want to talk about China and are not interested about learning about Russia.

    I’m not the one shitting on Russian culture, you are. I’m pointing out the obvious commonalities in Russian and Chinese history. Deng Xiaoping didn’t come up with “One Country, Two Systems”, the source of ethnonym you have for us, Khitans did, with a dual system of nomadic organization north of Great Wall, scholar-official bureacracy south of it, made a more “scalable” solution inherited by PRC.

    Similar to Mongol conquest of Russia that has made it into a more scalable multi-ethnic empire. Thus some historians call Batu first tsar of Russia–

    Батый — первый царь России
    https://diletant.media/articles/45302248/

    Russian Tsar Batu | Penzev Konstantin Alexandrovich

    According to the author, there was an unspoken agreement between Khan Baty, Russian princes and the Russian Orthodox Church on mutually beneficial cooperation in organizing the Horde

    https://libking.ru/books/sci-/sci-history/101578-konstantin-penzev-russkiy-tsar-batyy.html?__cf_chl_jschl_tk__=IHLVowDhxi3yq_iQ1cF3iSsXaDTSzT8vBZ_dVvslGgY-1636376717-0-gaNycGzNCOU

    “Wagner” was internal conflict of elites, with a popular group, while the army is in Ukraine. It’s not related to the flat terrain in Russia. The military doesn’t shoot against Wagner.

    Are you this dense? Can Blackwater PMC in Iraq/Afghanistan simply go renegade and turn its army on the US mainland, and drive tanks over vast oceans?

    Russia is less more expansionary than USA, Brazil.

    When was Brazil ever been depicted in such a way?

    China is an example of culture manufacturer, old center, while Russia is culture importer

    Buddhism was imported from India. PRC was founded by a Swede-Jew-Kalmyk and a Georgian. Modern Chinese couldn’t have a conversation without Japanese-made Chinese words, introduced through Dutch learning. Half of Chinese dynasties were ruled by Tatars.

    China in its history have cucked to dozens of barbarian invasions and Prigozhin-like usurpers, its civilisation survived because enough men didn’t wallowing in self-abasement, like you are doing now, not a good look.

    • Agree: Ivashka the fool
    • Replies: @Dmitry
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms


    shitting on Russian culture, you are. I’m pointing out the obvious commonalities in Russian and Chinese
     
    What is "shitting on Russian culture", I wonder about the lack of education of the person who cannot read about history without viewing it in terms of using a toilet, in this example probably some traditional Chinese toilet that doesn't connect to a water system.

    Why would writing about Russian history trigger a monomaniacal user to start writing a mix of insults and comments about China?

    This is rhetorical. I'm not wondering. Instead of reading interesting text written by someone who knows more about a topic than you, the monomaniacal user needs to intrude content about a country which has no similarity. It's expected of someone who has to add their country as the first word of their username. Not interested about others' countries, only interested about China.


    Are you this dense? Can Blackwater PMC in Iraq/Afghanistan simply go renegade and turn its army on the US mainland, and drive tanks over vast oceans?

     

    "Wagner" was internal rebellion inside southern Russia. They move inside the country because there is little internal resistance. The official army doesn't shoot, allows them through the checkpoint. It's not related to flat terrain.

    As for discussion about Iraq or Afghanistan going to US mainland. Those are separate countries, with a lot of distance. I'm sure if Afghanistan was an army inside America, they could drive to New York. However, the army and police would respond. Inside Russia, nobody shoots at "Wagner" except some helicopters, as they are "patriots" in Russia with support of the government marketing in the last months and "Wagner" are very popular with the local people.

    -

    By the way, Wagner was a German composer of the 19th century. He was very popular in Russia in the 19th century and partly creates the idea of developing what they called the national music in late Russian empire time, which is also concept imported into 19th century Russia from the German romanticism including Wagner's writings.


    Buddhism was imported from India. PRC was founded by a Swede-Jew-Kalmyk and a Georgian. Modern Chinese couldn’t have a conversation without Japanese-made Chinese words, introduced through Dutch learning. Half of Chinese dynasties were ruled by Tatars.

    China in its history have cucked to dozens of barbarian invasions
     

    China is a very interesting country, which is sad we don't learn about its history.

    Your post is at least reminder we should learn something about China. It's also reminder I should be reading texts written by educated people i.e. not the kind of people who view history in terms of alternative right American sexual memes ("cucked to dozens of barbarian").

  616. @Anatoly Karlin
    @Mr. XYZ


    If one wants greater economies of scale, why not support pro-natalism as well?
     
    There is no such thing as "Western values" (claims otherwise are chauvinist). There are values embraced by elite human capital (EHC) and all societies converge to them as EHC wins argument after argument.

    Natalism is implicitly anti-feminist. EHC rejects natalism. However, EHC is much more open to positive eugenics.

    AIs are good but potentially dangerous. A biosingularity is safer.

    Advocating turning the West into a dump while not intending to subsequently stay in the West to deal with the results of the mess that you helped create strikes me as being awfully disgraceful.
     
    EHC laughs at the idea of feeling some attachment to arbitray scraps of land, LOL.

    EHC doesn't fear competition. It thrives wherever it goes. If parts of the world landscape known as Western becomes dumps, EHC is free to create its own functional communities elsewhere, including in the Third World.

    BTW, off-topic, but in regards to a one-world government, even one noted supporter of open borders (Ilya Somin) has pointed out that a one-world government can result in a global tyranny with no exit options
     
    The main point is to collapse all existing nation-states along with Open Borders simultaneously. The organizing principle would be network states that own parcels of land in different areas of the world, secured on decentralized blockchain.

    BTW, do you acknowledge that Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine was a huge mistake since it denied tens/hundreds of thousands of people the chance to get access to anti-aging technology by getting killed prematurely...
     
    Yes, it was obviously a glaring demonstration of the total bankruptcy of nationalism and right-wing conservatism and associated EHC-uncompliant ideologies, and a strong signal that the world would be better off without them.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Mr. XYZ, @Emil Nikola Richard, @Yevardian, @Mr. XYZ

    Out of curiosity: How do you intend to convince, say, a Canadian that your (or EHC’s) proposed immigration policy is better than what Canada currently has? Canada accepts huge numbers of immigrants, especially per capita, each year, but does so with a focus on cognitive elites and their families (though there are also some refugees). If Canada–or any other Western country–will implement a UBI, wouldn’t the size of this UBI depend on just how productive these countries are actually going to be per capita? Or is super-smart AI going to make productivity increase so much that the GDP per capita of Western countries is likely going to be in the millions of US dollars, if not in the tens of millions of US dollars, even if they are flooded with low-IQ immigrants by the hundreds of millions of more?

    If it’s the latter scenario, then the West could potentially accept huge numbers of Third Worlders. Though there would still be issues with voting (super-smart AI won’t be able to vote, right?), crime, and terrorism to consider. The crime part I guess can be somewhat dealt with by encouraging *voluntary* segregation and freedom of association, though good luck selling that to a Woke and anti-racist public. The terrorism issue is not a problem in a statistical sense per se but is a problem when it comes to murdering people who do things that noticeably provoke Muslims, such as engaging in “Islamophobic” speech. Another reason to be very selective about whom one is importing from the Muslim world and importing only Muslim reformists and Muslim cognitive elites and not low-IQ Muslim rightoids. Not everyone can live in a gated community or afford to hire great personal security 24/7, after all. As it is, Ayaan Hirsi Ali (a survivor of Muslim female genital mutilation) and a vehement critic of various backwards Islamic practices had to move from the Netherlands to the US because the security situation for her was better in the US relative to the Netherlands (less problematic Muslim population, for one).

    BTW, even applying out own logic about arbitrary scraps of land: There should be no problem with Ukraine ethnically cleansing Crimea and Donbass just so long as no one is killed, right? After all, these people can be resettled elsewhere, right? Crimea and Donbass are just arbitrary scraps of land, after all. So, why prolong the war over them?

    • Replies: @Anatoly Karlin
    @Mr. XYZ


    Out of curiosity: How do you intend to convince, say, a Canadian that your (or EHC’s) proposed immigration policy is better than what Canada currently has?
     
    The first and main task is to set up successful network states that concentrate human and financial capital, by definition siphoning it from the nation-states (which is a net benefit, denuding as it does the enemy of EHC), and acquire land in the real world. This is already happening to some extent - see Zuzalu; Prospera.

    This would present an attractive alternate to the stifling tyranny of centralized states.

    These network states at least at first will be built around ideologies that find it difficult to find purchase in the real normie world. Life extensionists, AI people, crypto bros, etc. are the obvious first movers on account of their technophilia, but over time many other movements can embrace it - the idea is basically built for Dreher's Benedict Option.

    Given sufficient concentrations of EHC and financial capital, politicians and pundits can be inspired, persuaded, cajoled, or bribed to create special conditions for network state operations within their territories. As I mentioned above, the most obvious initial targets are geopolitically neutral weak small states in the Third World that need money and want to put themselves on the map.

    Banally, I suspect just amping up "ordinary" mass immigration would be a good way to destabilize the more dangerous big First World states (which will constitute a global threat to network states). Happily, this is congruent with EHC preferences (one of the things on which Ron Unz is unambiguously correct is that normies don't take r*ghtoid talking points on immigrants seriously).

    By accelerating a multicultural setting as default, this spurs some important dynamics:

    (1) Identitarians/ethno-nationalists who value ethno-cultural homogeneity, at some point, will go "fuck it, this shit is beyond saving" and defect from their societies. For instance, take prestigious London. Does any sane English identitarian see anything worth preserving there? The only problem is that there are no attractive choices now. Expating to Third World? Radical politics? Or they could defect to a nation-state, e.g. even one built around a racially homogenous (if that is the preference) neo-Victorian aesthetic that could be nicer than London ever was. It needn't be in the UK or even Europe.

    (2) Normies OK with multiculturalism and who are highly mobile on average would have no problems making the transition by default.

    The other, more purely economic dynamic is that by sucking in EHC, you deprive the First World centralized states of them, including much of the tax base. Meanwhile, the importation of less productive Third Worlders - to the extent that the "import the Third World, become the Third World" people are correct - will increase the fiscal burden on those states due to lower productivity, higher welfare demands, less trust, and more tax evasion. They will have to downsize, creating a void that will be filled by... you guessed it network states.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Ivashka the fool, @Mr. XYZ

    , @Mr. XYZ
    @Mr. XYZ

    "BTW, even applying *your* own logic about arbitrary scraps of land: ..."

    (Corrected typo. It's "your", not "out".)

    As a side note, I find the horseshoe theory interesting:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horseshoe_theory#:~:text=In%20popular%20discourse%2C%20the%20horseshoe,a%20horseshoe%20are%20close%20together.

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/bc/Political_spectrum_horseshoe_model.svg/1920px-Political_spectrum_horseshoe_model.svg.png

    The reason that I'm mentioning it here is because white nationalists/white supremacists and the Woke Left have some things in common. For instance, white nationalists and the Woke Left both support voluntary segregation, at least sometimes:

    https://www.nas.org/blogs/article/separate_but_equal_again_neo_segregation_at_yale

    https://joegarzacreates.medium.com/racial-segregation-is-only-acceptable-if-its-woke-apparently-dbb494feca26

    Similarly, historical white supremacists and the Woke Left both believe that non-East Asian people of color can only thrive and prosper when they are near a lot of whites. This was the historical justification for colonialism (a part of it, at least) and the current justification for open borders.

  617. @Mikhail
    @German_reader


    The bs about the poor, oppressed Crimean Tatars is just meant as a way to get around the fact that most of Crimea’s current population is Russian or pro-Russian. Contrary to what AP asserts, it’s actually the Ukrainian or pro-Ukrainian side which is playing the “muh colonialism” card and implicitly arguing that the Russians there are just colonial settlers who should leave if they don’t like it.
    As for the history, really a bit much that one is apparently now expected to regard the Crimean Khanate as just some poor, innocent victim of Muscovite imperialism. But I guess there are enough Western normies who will believe it.
     
    With the majority of Crimea's Ukrainians supporting that region's reunification with Russia, to go along with the majority of Ukraine's Crimean armed forces going over to Russia.

    On one of your points, I know a Ukrainian who said he had a cousin in the Ukrainian marines circa 1990s. His cousin was injured in a skirmish involving Crimean Tatar squatters, adding that such instances of Crimean Tatar violence weren't covered.

    Replies: @Wokechoke

    Various interesting bets being made about who has the staying power.

  618. @AP
    @German_reader


    The bs about the poor, oppressed Crimean Tatars is just meant as a way to get around the fact that most of Crimea’s current population is Russian or pro-Russian.
     
    It's not bs (they were mass deported, how is it bullshit about them being oppressed?). Some Russians make some silly claims about how Crimea is ancient or core Russian territory. So I pointed out that the Russians weren't even the largest ethnicity there until the early 20th century and not even the majority until World War II, when they mass deported the indigenous Tatars.

    Russians in Crimea are roughly analogous to Albanians in Kosovo. Except Albanians eventually became 90% of Kosovo's population while in 2014 Russians were only about 60% of Crimea's population.

    As for the history, really a bit much that one is apparently now expected to regard the Crimean Khanate as just some poor, innocent victim of Muscovite imperialism
     
    Can one also regard it as "a bit much" to regard the USSR (no less bloodthirsty, perhaps more, than the Crimean Khanate) as some poor, innocent victim of German imperialism?

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @Mikhail

    Putin/post-Soviet Russia acknowledge the wrongness of the WW II era deportation of the Crimean Tatars – something akin to how Japanese North Americans were treated.

    In contrast, the Kiev regime propped Crimean Tatar extremist Mustafa Dzhemilev advocates the ethnic cleansing of Russians:

    https://www.academia.edu/37358188/Michael_Averko_Consistency_and_Reality_Lacking_on_Crimea

    https://www.eurasiareview.com/07092018-consistency-and-reality-lacking-on-crimea-analysis/

  619. @Anatoly Karlin
    @Mr. XYZ


    If one wants greater economies of scale, why not support pro-natalism as well?
     
    There is no such thing as "Western values" (claims otherwise are chauvinist). There are values embraced by elite human capital (EHC) and all societies converge to them as EHC wins argument after argument.

    Natalism is implicitly anti-feminist. EHC rejects natalism. However, EHC is much more open to positive eugenics.

    AIs are good but potentially dangerous. A biosingularity is safer.

    Advocating turning the West into a dump while not intending to subsequently stay in the West to deal with the results of the mess that you helped create strikes me as being awfully disgraceful.
     
    EHC laughs at the idea of feeling some attachment to arbitray scraps of land, LOL.

    EHC doesn't fear competition. It thrives wherever it goes. If parts of the world landscape known as Western becomes dumps, EHC is free to create its own functional communities elsewhere, including in the Third World.

    BTW, off-topic, but in regards to a one-world government, even one noted supporter of open borders (Ilya Somin) has pointed out that a one-world government can result in a global tyranny with no exit options
     
    The main point is to collapse all existing nation-states along with Open Borders simultaneously. The organizing principle would be network states that own parcels of land in different areas of the world, secured on decentralized blockchain.

    BTW, do you acknowledge that Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine was a huge mistake since it denied tens/hundreds of thousands of people the chance to get access to anti-aging technology by getting killed prematurely...
     
    Yes, it was obviously a glaring demonstration of the total bankruptcy of nationalism and right-wing conservatism and associated EHC-uncompliant ideologies, and a strong signal that the world would be better off without them.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Mr. XYZ, @Emil Nikola Richard, @Yevardian, @Mr. XYZ

    Elite human capital =~ chickensh|t cock $uckers.

    There are plenty of humans they cannot defeat or frighten unless they blow up nuclear bombs and themselves.

  620. @Mr. XYZ
    @Anatoly Karlin


    There is no such thing as “Western values” (claims otherwise are chauvinist). There are values embraced by elite human capital (EHC) and all societies converge to them as EHC wins argument after argument.
     
    Elite human capital supported Communism a century ago, no? Yet Communists never gained power in the West and the countries where Communists did gain power turned into relative dumps.

    Your logic is similar to Lenin's from a century ago: "We (elite human capital) know what's best, so who the fuck cares what the proles think? They voted for the SRs? Too bad, they can suck it up! We know better than they do! We won the urban vote, and the cities lead the countryside in terms of social progress!"

    Natalism is implicitly anti-feminist.
     
    Won't be anti-feminist with artificial wombs. They and realistic sex dolls will make real women partially redundant, for that matter. Could also help minor-attracted persons by giving them a realistic outlet for their sex drives that does not involve actually harming anyone (child sex dolls, or child sex robots with AI programming to give them a childlike personality, other than in regards to sex, where they will have an adult-like mentality and understanding of consent).

    EHC rejects natalism.
     
    The EHC who are anti-natalists are selecting themselves out of the gene pool:

    https://emilkirkegaard.dk/en/2022/06/new-study-out-will-intelligent-latter-day-saints-and-smart-conservatives-inherit-the-earth/

    https://emilkirkegaard.dk/en/wp-content/uploads/dysgenics-mormons-2048x1331.png

    https://emilkirkegaard.dk/en/wp-content/uploads/dysgenics-politics-2048x1331.jpeg

    In the future, there could be more smart conservatives relative to smart liberals unless liberals will successfully win over enough smart conservatives with new arguments each and every generation. This could bode very well for the alt-center.

    However, EHC is much more open to positive eugenics.

    However, EHC is much more open to positive eugenics.
     
    If smart people don't want to breed at all, good luck getting them to breed eugenically!

    AIs are good but potentially dangerous. A biosingularity is safer.
     
    And encouraging smart people to reproduce more does not help make a biosingularity likelier? At least in a relative sense, due to it making fertility more eugenic than it would have otherwise been?

    EHC laughs at the idea of feeling some attachment to arbitray scraps of land, LOL.
     
    Those arbitrary scraps of land and their people have achieved a lot.

    For that matter, why bother respecting private property? It also often has a history of force and coercion behind it if you go back far enough, just like nation-states have. Even if one acquired one's private property fairly, someone far enough back down the line possibly did not do so, thus arguably making your own claim on this private property illegitimate as well.

    EHC doesn’t fear competition. It thrives wherever it goes. If parts of the world landscape known as Western becomes dumps, EHC is free to create its own functional communities elsewhere, including in the Third World.
     
    Good luck creating your own states and keeping low human capital out. Third World countries aren't very tolerant of secession, and if EHC will be keeping low human capital out of their new communities, then they will be accused of hypocrisy over their previous open borders stance.

    The main point is to collapse all existing nation-states along with Open Borders simultaneously. The organizing principle would be network states that own parcels of land in different areas of the world, secured on decentralized blockchain.
     
    Network states have existed throughout history and yet they didn't completely eliminate nation-states. You don't think that the Roman Catholic Church is a network state, for instance? Or the Jesuits? Or Latin American drug cartels? Or the mafia? In the first couple of cases, they even had their own centers of learning and education (universities and monasteries) which were used to facilitate a lot of elite science production in the pre-modern era, no?

    Also, are ordinary people actually going to benefit from network states or is it only going to be for the elites? Because how exactly are you and/or EHC supposed to get ordinary people to support your little idea here if it doesn't actually benefit them in any way whatsoever?

    Yes, it was obviously a glaring demonstration of the total bankruptcy of nationalism and right-wing conservatism and associated EHC-uncompliant ideologies, and a strong signal that the world would be better off without them.
     
    And you couldn't have reached this conclusion before the start of that war? Before over 100,000 people needlessly lost their lives?

    Russian EHC (such as atheists) were considerably more skeptical of the Ukraine invasion than Russia's population at large was (atheists were 50-50 on the invasion, Orthodox Christians overwhelmingly in favor), and yet back when you thought that Russia still had a chance of winning, you ignored the opinion of Russian EHC and instead supported the opinion of Russian proles. What made you so cavalierly dismiss the opinion of Russian EHC back then?

    Replies: @Anatoly Karlin

    Elite human capital supported Communism a century ago, no?

    No.

    For that matter, why bother respecting private property?

    To not get arrested and imprisoned. Absence of centralized states does not imply absence of laws or regulations on particular territories.

    Third World countries aren’t very tolerant of secession, and if EHC will be keeping low human capital out of their new communities, then they will be accused of hypocrisy over their previous open borders stance.

    Crypto adoption is more advanced in the Third World in large part because there is a greater need for trustless systems.

    Their states are weaker too.

    I am bullish on the prospects for network states in the Third World. Montenegro, Uruguay, Honduras, El Salvador are lighting are way.

    Network states have existed throughout history and yet they didn’t completely eliminate nation-states.

    They existed in worlds in which tools for decentralized governance were non-existent. That is no longer the case.

    And you couldn’t have reached this conclusion before the start of that war? Before over 100,000 people needlessly lost their lives?

    The old models had to be invalidated. It is sad that East Slavs are again the main subjects, as with Communism, but such is the will of history.

    What made you so cavalierly dismiss the opinion of Russian EHC back then?

    The hostility of EHC to Russian nationalism and patriotism always nagged at me. I assumed it was a delusion, like their greater aversion to HBD, and had documented many specific instances in which they were simply factually wrong about Russia.

    However, in the generalities, EHC were roundly vindicated.

    This also implies they are correct broadly on pro-immigration, anti-racism, feminism, LGBT, Wokeness, etc., if not on some specifics.

    EHC will not be contained. 💯

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @Anatoly Karlin


    No.
     
    FWIW, I wasn't talking about all EHC supporting it, but rather about it being a "breaking wave" idea among them. Communist support was not extraordinarily rare among Western intellectuals in the post-WWII period, for instance:

    https://www.transform-network.net/en/blog/article/communist-intellectuals-in-western-europe-a-comparative-study-of-france-austria-italy-and-the-uni/

    (You could say that several hundred intellectuals isn't that much, but just how many intellectuals were there in these countries in total?)

    To not get arrested and imprisoned. Absence of centralized states does not imply absence of laws or regulations on particular territories.

     

    I meant having governments respect private property.

    Crypto adoption is more advanced in the Third World in large part because there is a greater need for trustless systems.

    Their states are weaker too.
     
    Third Worlders don't like trust?

    And is the Third World in general very welcoming to low-IQ immigrants from other Third World countries?

    Obviously state power is weaker in the Third World; hence their mafia, drug cartel, et cetera problems, such as in Latin America.

    I am bullish on the prospects for network states in the Third World. Montenegro, Uruguay, Honduras, El Salvador are lighting are way.
     
    What does EU law say about this topic, if anything? Montenegro wants to eventually join the EU. How would that fit into things? Will it suck up a lot of the EU's EHC? When one thinks about it, this would be the best of both worlds for Montenegro: Becoming a huge player in its own right AND joining a 500+ million-strong confederation.

    They existed in worlds in which tools for decentralized governance were non-existent. That is no longer the case.
     
    Interesting.

    The old models had to be invalidated. It is sad that East Slavs are again the main subjects, as with Communism, but such is the will of history.
     
    Yep, rather sad to see East Slavs be a laboratory for social experiments. First Communism and then Russian nationalism.

    The hostility of EHC to Russian nationalism and patriotism always nagged at me. I assumed it was a delusion, like their greater aversion to HBD, and had documented many specific instances in which they were simply factually wrong about Russia.
     
    Yeah, I first saw your work a decade or so ago and found it very interesting. Helped present a more accurate picture of Russia. I do think that for EHC, including Russian EHC, European nationalism is simply more attractive than Russian nationalism is. Much greater economies of scale, after all. A 500+ million-strong confederation (650+ million-strong with Russia) would inherently be more impressive than a 200+ million-strong confederation or even federation, after all. Russia had its chance for greatness in the 20th century but unfortunately blew it because no one was willing to kill Lenin early enough. (Though even in that scenario, I'd have still favored giving Ukraine, Central Asia, et cetera the option of secession referendums had they actually asked for it due to my own rejection of Russian imperialism. But core Russia would have still had 300 million people, which would have been much more impressive relative to real life.)

    However, in the generalities, EHC were roundly vindicated.

    This also implies they are correct broadly on pro-immigration, anti-racism, feminism, LGBT, Wokeness, etc., if not on some specifics.

    EHC will not be contained. 💯
     
    If EHC is always right, why has it failed to get the proles to agree to remove the natural-born citizen requirement for the US Presidency? AFAICT, EHC is almost universally hostile towards this requirement (and likely has been for decades), and yet due to prole opposition there has been no genuinely serious effort to remove this requirement, not even in the 21st century. The US is an outlier among developed countries in this regard. Other developed countries don't have a natural-born citizen requirement for their leaders. Not even Germany. Not even after Hitler.
    , @Mr. XYZ
    @Anatoly Karlin

    BTW, in regards to multiculturalism specifically, I like the alt-centrist/California model of pan-enclavism:

    https://robertstark.substack.com/p/californias-future-of-pan-enclavism

    The US could have more generous immigration, of course, both of cognitive elites and working-classes, but generally immigration has worked out better for California than it has for, say, Western Europe. (It worked out even better for Canada but Canada imported less working-class people than California did, so overall California's integration and assimilation record is more impressive adjusted for demographics, even though inevitable achievement gaps remain.)

    Would be interesting if you would ever be willing to write a blog post and/or article about Russia's potential demographics in the 20th and 21st centuries without Communism. I don't mean just total population (which you already covered with the 500 Million Russians article), but rather about the details, such as how a Central Asian mass migration to European Russia's (incl. Ukraine's and Belarus's) cities would have looked like, whether Russia would have ever received any mass immigration from East Asia and/or South Asia, how the Russian people would have reacted to all of this without Communism, whether Russian Jews would have been as pro-immigration as their US counterparts, et cetera.

    In a separate blog post and/or article, you can also discuss whether an SR-led Russia would have ever been willing to go to war against Japan, such as in the 1930s and/or 1940s, in order to expel Japan from China and/or Korea and to stop the Japanese human rights abuses there.

    BTW, off-topic, but re: network states: As the example of Montenegro and the EU shows, a network state can theoretically exist within a much larger nation-state (or a much larger confederation that mimics a very decentralized nation-state, as with the EU). This could be a useful strategy: For instance, West Virginia can appeal to more traditionally-minded Americans to resettle there and build their own little version of paradise (white-opia) there, just so long as its advertising for this will not violate any US laws or the US Constitution. This could allow the US's Woke elites to give US white nationalists a little piece of America for themselves to larp in while of course ensuring that they remain in the US and not move abroad. At the very least, it's worth a shot.

    BTW, what's the meaningful difference between network states and charter cities?

  621. @AP
    @songbird


    It may be that AP is a crypto-Turk who boosts Austria-Hungary and the Intermarium, as a cloak and disguise.
     
    Well, according to pan-Turkic nationalists, all Ukrainians are crypto-Turks. I had a friend in university about 30 years ago, from one of the ex-Soviet Turkic republics who was really into this idea, we had such a drunken geopolitical discussion. He was proclaiming that we are all Turks really, and that the Russians are our mutual enemies. He was a nephew of his country's president, and is now a high ranking government official, I am glad that his country supports Ukraine, such fantasies among Turks may be useful :-)

    And according to early modern Polish Sarmatists, all Polish nobles were crypto-Turks (they believed that they were descended from Sarmatians, and back then it was falsely believed that Sarmatians were Turkic people - we now know that Sarmatians were Iranic rather than Turkic). And this was at the time when Poles were always at war with the Turks. They thought of the conflict as religious more than ethnic.

    But in reality, I am less of a crypto-Turk than "wokechoke" is a crypto-Jew.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @Ivashka the fool, @songbird

    When was Poland continuously at war with Turkey?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Russo-Turkish_wars

    While the Russians were battling it out with the Turks from Ivan Grozny to Peter the Great era through Elizabeth to Catherine and finally Alexander and Nicholas where were these Poles again?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish–Ottoman_War_(1672–1676)

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish–Ottoman_War_(1683–1699)

    There’s around 30 years of kinetic contact. That’s about it.

    Compared to this…

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Russo-Turkish_wars

    400 years of fighting the Turks around the Black Sea and the Danube and Volga Rivers.

    What were the Poles doing as the Russians finally ejected the Turk from the northern rim of the Black Sea? Oh that’s right, preparing an all out assault on Moscow in cahoots with Napoleon.

    • Replies: @AP
    @Wokechoke


    While the Russians were battling it out with the Turks from Ivan Grozny to Peter the Great era through Elizabeth to Catherine and finally Alexander and Nicholas where were these Poles again?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish–Ottoman_War_(1672–1676)

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish–Ottoman_War_(1683–1699)

    There’s around 30 years of kinetic contact. That’s about it.
     
    You lie by omission. Full list is here:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish%E2%80%93Ottoman_Wars

    At the Battle of Khotyn in 1621, a Polish-Ukrainian force defeated a massive Ottoman-Tatar army that was about the same size as the one that would be defeated at Vienna a few generations later:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Khotyn_(1621)

    Compared to this…

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Russo-Turkish_wars

    400 years of fighting the Turks around the Black Sea and the Danube and Volga Rivers.

     

    The Polish victories over the Ottomsns were far more consequential for European history and for keeping the Turks out of Europe then were the Russian battles with them over some peripheral areas, or later victories when the Ottomans were a fading power and no longer much of a threat. When the Turks were a superpower, at their peak, the Poles fought and defeated them. Russia mostly just picked over the leftovers afterward.

    What were the Poles doing as the Russians finally ejected the Turk from the northern rim of the Black Sea? Oh that’s right, preparing an all out assault on Moscow in cahoots with Napoleon.
     
    Russia wanted an alliance with the Turks and had one for a few years, before the Turks rejected the Russians.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russo-Ottoman_alliance

    “The Russo-Ottoman alliance was a defensive alliance between the Russian Empire and the Ottoman Empire, directed against France between 1799 and 1806, during the Napoleonic Wars.”

    Replies: @Mikhail, @Mr. XYZ

  622. S says:
    @Greasy William
    @S

    I had never heard about the multi faith group trying to avoid the end times.

    Every major failed messiah claimant in history also had huge internal Jewish opposition. Certainly Zevi did. I don't see any messianic type figures out there right now.

    I do agree that it is preferable that people who think like me are kept far away from the levers of power. If I was Israeli PM I would just do everything I could to provoke Russia because I'm convinced a nuclear holocaust is inevitable so we might as well get it over with. I'm glad our leaders are at least trying to avoid that.

    My interpretation of Revelation is that it is a revenge fantasy of an unhinged and drug addled Jewish ultra nationalist. 666 is obviously a reference to Nero. I don't think the book has any prophetic value and I'm certainly not alone: it came very close to not being made part of the canon by the Church Fathers, Luther wanted to remove it (he also wanted to remove James but political reasons made it impossible to remove either) from the Bible and Calvin didn't even bother to write a commentary on it (after writing a commentary on every other book in both the Old Testament and the New).

    Replies: @S, @Greasy William

    I had never heard about the multi faith group trying to avoid the end times.

    Not trying ‘to avoid the end times’, rather they were concerned about ‘self-fulfilling prophecy’.

    I don’t think the book [Revelation] has any prophetic value and I’m certainly not alone..

    Aa far as I know you are not a Christian, so understandable.

    If I was Israeli PM I would just do everything I could to provoke Russia because I’m convinced a nuclear holocaust is inevitable so we might as well get it over with.

    Well, that’s not a very positive outlook. [Here I think you are trolling.]

    666 is obviously a reference to Nero.

    Whaaaaat? You don’t think it’s a reference to Ronald Wilson Reagan or the new King Charles…the latter long being seen as a favorite candidate. (J/k)

    Am reminded how once the old Art Bell show one night featured an ‘Anti-christ hotline’. Only the A-C could call in. That was rather amusing. 😀

    Anyhow, thanks for your thoughts.

  623. @Anatoly Karlin
    @Mr. XYZ


    If one wants greater economies of scale, why not support pro-natalism as well?
     
    There is no such thing as "Western values" (claims otherwise are chauvinist). There are values embraced by elite human capital (EHC) and all societies converge to them as EHC wins argument after argument.

    Natalism is implicitly anti-feminist. EHC rejects natalism. However, EHC is much more open to positive eugenics.

    AIs are good but potentially dangerous. A biosingularity is safer.

    Advocating turning the West into a dump while not intending to subsequently stay in the West to deal with the results of the mess that you helped create strikes me as being awfully disgraceful.
     
    EHC laughs at the idea of feeling some attachment to arbitray scraps of land, LOL.

    EHC doesn't fear competition. It thrives wherever it goes. If parts of the world landscape known as Western becomes dumps, EHC is free to create its own functional communities elsewhere, including in the Third World.

    BTW, off-topic, but in regards to a one-world government, even one noted supporter of open borders (Ilya Somin) has pointed out that a one-world government can result in a global tyranny with no exit options
     
    The main point is to collapse all existing nation-states along with Open Borders simultaneously. The organizing principle would be network states that own parcels of land in different areas of the world, secured on decentralized blockchain.

    BTW, do you acknowledge that Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine was a huge mistake since it denied tens/hundreds of thousands of people the chance to get access to anti-aging technology by getting killed prematurely...
     
    Yes, it was obviously a glaring demonstration of the total bankruptcy of nationalism and right-wing conservatism and associated EHC-uncompliant ideologies, and a strong signal that the world would be better off without them.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Mr. XYZ, @Emil Nikola Richard, @Yevardian, @Mr. XYZ

    Natalism is implicitly anti-feminist. EHC rejects natalism. However, EHC is much more open to positive eugenics.

    AIs are good but potentially dangerous. A biosingularity is safer.

    Alright with woke-incel ‘It’ latest Karlin-brand returning, its finally too much. Mental illness online is only tolerable when you can’t picture the person behind it.
    With the increasing Jews-manipulating-my-bowels posting, the HBD/haplogroup circlejerks, redditposters and XYZ’s spam, I’m following AnonFromTN and taking an indefinite break from this asylum again.
    Regards to Barbarossa, Bashibuzuk/Ivashka, Dmitry, Gerard, G_R, Mikel etc.

    • Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
    @Yevardian

    Your glass is half full.

    If it has nothing better to do than post here is that really a bad development? If you think this board is bad, just wait until you see some of the others.

    https://empslocal.ex.ac.uk/people/staff/mrwatkin/PKDick.htm

    , @German_reader
    @Yevardian

    Yeah, I've got enough of this shitshow myself. Iirc you've got my mail in case you want to stay in touch.

    Replies: @Yevardian

  624. @LatW
    @sudden death

    Typical Luka. :) Too funny. "Here's a camp with a fence where you can live, here's a plot where you can grow some potatoes". LOL

    Of course, he doesn't want them there. He likes "sovereignty". :) The Belarusian military probably don't like them all that much either.

    They may split them up and disperse them into different units. But the Wagnerites probably won't like it. I wonder if they have run out of money, apparently they found millions of dollars & roubles in cash and gold bars on Prigo, as well as fake passports, I wonder if they confiscated all that. Who knows if he was going to share that with all his mercs or just take it and bail (as a Plan B if the "coup" didn't work).

    According to Osechkin from Gulagu.net, all those "businesses" they have in Africa are connected to the very top (Kovalchuk, Timchenko, Putin). So they do rely on Wagner to police it there. This is apparently the reason why they have not yet eliminated them (they could've easily done it in Ukraine, if they had wanted to).

    But Prigo apparently flew to St Pete again.

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @QCIC

    If Russia wants to send Wagner troops to lurk above Kiev, I don’t see a good reason they need to be coy about it. They can’t hide it.

    Wagner troops could be in Belarus to fight fifth columnists.

    It would not surprise me if they want to send 10 thousand Wagnerians to Kaliningrad to bolster defenses there.

  625. @Mr. XYZ
    @Anatoly Karlin

    Out of curiosity: How do you intend to convince, say, a Canadian that your (or EHC's) proposed immigration policy is better than what Canada currently has? Canada accepts huge numbers of immigrants, especially per capita, each year, but does so with a focus on cognitive elites and their families (though there are also some refugees). If Canada--or any other Western country--will implement a UBI, wouldn't the size of this UBI depend on just how productive these countries are actually going to be per capita? Or is super-smart AI going to make productivity increase so much that the GDP per capita of Western countries is likely going to be in the millions of US dollars, if not in the tens of millions of US dollars, even if they are flooded with low-IQ immigrants by the hundreds of millions of more?

    If it's the latter scenario, then the West could potentially accept huge numbers of Third Worlders. Though there would still be issues with voting (super-smart AI won't be able to vote, right?), crime, and terrorism to consider. The crime part I guess can be somewhat dealt with by encouraging *voluntary* segregation and freedom of association, though good luck selling that to a Woke and anti-racist public. The terrorism issue is not a problem in a statistical sense per se but is a problem when it comes to murdering people who do things that noticeably provoke Muslims, such as engaging in "Islamophobic" speech. Another reason to be very selective about whom one is importing from the Muslim world and importing only Muslim reformists and Muslim cognitive elites and not low-IQ Muslim rightoids. Not everyone can live in a gated community or afford to hire great personal security 24/7, after all. As it is, Ayaan Hirsi Ali (a survivor of Muslim female genital mutilation) and a vehement critic of various backwards Islamic practices had to move from the Netherlands to the US because the security situation for her was better in the US relative to the Netherlands (less problematic Muslim population, for one).

    BTW, even applying out own logic about arbitrary scraps of land: There should be no problem with Ukraine ethnically cleansing Crimea and Donbass just so long as no one is killed, right? After all, these people can be resettled elsewhere, right? Crimea and Donbass are just arbitrary scraps of land, after all. So, why prolong the war over them?

    Replies: @Anatoly Karlin, @Mr. XYZ

    Out of curiosity: How do you intend to convince, say, a Canadian that your (or EHC’s) proposed immigration policy is better than what Canada currently has?

    The first and main task is to set up successful network states that concentrate human and financial capital, by definition siphoning it from the nation-states (which is a net benefit, denuding as it does the enemy of EHC), and acquire land in the real world. This is already happening to some extent – see Zuzalu; Prospera.

    This would present an attractive alternate to the stifling tyranny of centralized states.

    These network states at least at first will be built around ideologies that find it difficult to find purchase in the real normie world. Life extensionists, AI people, crypto bros, etc. are the obvious first movers on account of their technophilia, but over time many other movements can embrace it – the idea is basically built for Dreher’s Benedict Option.

    Given sufficient concentrations of EHC and financial capital, politicians and pundits can be inspired, persuaded, cajoled, or bribed to create special conditions for network state operations within their territories. As I mentioned above, the most obvious initial targets are geopolitically neutral weak small states in the Third World that need money and want to put themselves on the map.

    Banally, I suspect just amping up “ordinary” mass immigration would be a good way to destabilize the more dangerous big First World states (which will constitute a global threat to network states). Happily, this is congruent with EHC preferences (one of the things on which Ron Unz is unambiguously correct is that normies don’t take r*ghtoid talking points on immigrants seriously).

    By accelerating a multicultural setting as default, this spurs some important dynamics:

    (1) Identitarians/ethno-nationalists who value ethno-cultural homogeneity, at some point, will go “fuck it, this shit is beyond saving” and defect from their societies. For instance, take prestigious London. Does any sane English identitarian see anything worth preserving there? The only problem is that there are no attractive choices now. Expating to Third World? Radical politics? Or they could defect to a nation-state, e.g. even one built around a racially homogenous (if that is the preference) neo-Victorian aesthetic that could be nicer than London ever was. It needn’t be in the UK or even Europe.

    (2) Normies OK with multiculturalism and who are highly mobile on average would have no problems making the transition by default.

    The other, more purely economic dynamic is that by sucking in EHC, you deprive the First World centralized states of them, including much of the tax base. Meanwhile, the importation of less productive Third Worlders – to the extent that the “import the Third World, become the Third World” people are correct – will increase the fiscal burden on those states due to lower productivity, higher welfare demands, less trust, and more tax evasion. They will have to downsize, creating a void that will be filled by… you guessed it network states.

    • Thanks: Mr. XYZ
    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @Anatoly Karlin

    I think that the level of human capital that would be willing to defect from nation-states to network states would not be that large unless nation-states become total dumps, which even multicultural nation-states such as Canada are extremely eager to avoid. You could potentially see some alt-right/Trumpist types eventually seek to do this, for instance, but the problem remains that the alt-right/Trumpists don't exactly represent the cognitive elites of the conservative movement. Here in the US, the cognitive elites of the conservative movement have a somewhat more favorable opinion of the mainstream Left (and ditto of the mainstream Left towards them) simply because they dislike some of the excesses of Trumpism, such as January 6 and Trump's general corruption and arguable abuse of power.

    For network states to really be viable, you need an extraordinarily massive influx of EHC AND a huge population in general (at least eventually) that would be capable of effectively competing with the traditional nation-states (which also means having enough space and resources to sustain such a population). Israel isn't a network state, but it is an example of a movement that got a lot of EHC to move to a place which previously didn't have much of it and which subsequently made this place much nicer than it would have otherwise been. But Israel isn't a giant geopolitical player along the lines of the US or EU or China or even India and won't even be due to a lack of sufficient space and resources to sustain anywhere near as large of a population as any of these places have.

    And let's imagine some other factors: If you want to create a neo-Victorian white ethnostate, for instance, how exactly are you going to do it in a majority non-white country? At the very least, even if the law will allow for this, will such a setting actually be convincing, so to speak? Are the whites there going to pretend to be a European colony in a non-white land in the colonial era, or what?

    , @Ivashka the fool
    @Anatoly Karlin

    Very interesting. Very well articulated. I have recently been thinking about the network states for Identitarians, but didn't go that far in my reflection. Basically evolving social anthropology adopting new technologies and adapting to the Technosphere. Competing evolution of network states and post-national states / governments. Makes sense in the globalized future. Although I am pretty sure that TPTB will crush such attempts.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Anatoly Karlin

    , @Mr. XYZ
    @Anatoly Karlin


    (1) Identitarians/ethno-nationalists who value ethno-cultural homogeneity, at some point, will go “fuck it, this shit is beyond saving” and defect from their societies.
     
    Maybe, but would the types who are particularly eager to do that be of particularly high human capital to begin with? You yourself have previously said that nationalism suffers from a low human capital problem in much of the world other than, of course, in Ukraine. This suggests that the exodus of the more nationalistic elements, especially the duller ones, among the European/white populations of the developed world would not necessarily be viewed as a bad thing by our Woke elites.

    Meanwhile, the importation of less productive Third Worlders – to the extent that the “import the Third World, become the Third World” people are correct – will increase the fiscal burden on those states due to lower productivity, higher welfare demands, less trust, and more tax evasion. They will have to downsize, creating a void that will be filled by… you guessed it network states.
     
    That's why any reasonably sane and self-interested nation-state would primarily seek to import the Third World's cognitive elites and only then worry about their working-classes, other than in truly exceptional circumstances (genuine refugees and/or witness protection in order to protect people from dangerous and vengeful drug lords, for instance).

    BTW, before your recent conversion, did you not view a super-powerful Russia (one that includes both Ukraine and Belarus) as a threat to network states? A super-powerful Russia, had it actually been realized, could have also been quite a formidable threat to network states, no? At least on the scale of a hypothetical surviving Japanese Empire that would have permanently kept both South Korea and Taiwan, since then their populations, at around 200 million, would have been roughly comparable. And Russia strikes me as having rather authoritarian and even totalitarian tendencies even in comparison to the West (at least the US), albeit obviously considerably less so relative to the USSR:

    https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-50902496

    Our Woke press and government might lie a lot about racial questions, but still allow one to find the truth if one searches well/deeply enough, as well as to look at non-Western websites, even those from hostile countries.

    BTW, if elite human capital is always right, then when is elite human capital finally going to make paying child support voluntary and optional?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paper_abortion

    Some intellectuals have already supported this idea, especially those of a liberal and libertarian persuasion. Cathy Young, for instance.

    BTW, what are your thoughts on Philippe Lemoine's argument that the West should have simply thrown Ukraine under the bus and subsequently sponsored an anti-Russian insurgency there 'coz doing so is cheaper than sponsoring a conventional Ukrainian war effort against Russia and that since doing so would piss off Russia to a lesser extent than sponsoring a conventional Ukrainian war effort would?

    https://www.philippelemoine.com/p/the-case-against-western-military

    I think that his argument is naive because in regards to Ukraine, Russia likely has a very high pain tolerance that can quite possibly be reached by a successful Ukrainian conventional war effort but not by a Ukrainian insurgency. In order to get the French from Algeria, 150,000 FLN troops had to lose their lives beforehand, as did between 25,000 and 30,000 French troops and 6,000 French civilians. Without their government quite literally forcing them to fight, I don't see Ukrainians voluntarily being willing to endure those kinds of losses in order to drive Russia out of Ukraine, and anything less might not be enough, in which case Russia would have stayed in Ukraine indefinitely. (Philippe is naive in thinking that Russia would be open to a negotiated settlement in the event of a successful Russian conquest of Ukraine if Russian losses afterwards as a result of a subsequent Ukrainian insurgency simply won't be high enough to teach Russia's pain tolerance limit.) I also don't see Russia being all that much friendlier with the West if the West will let Russia conquer Ukraine but then try sponsoring an anti-Russian insurgency in Ukraine; Russia will still view such a Western move as an extremely hostile anti-Russian act (especially if this Ukrainian insurgency will result in anti-Russian terrorist attacks, including in Russia proper) and as continued aggressive Western meddling in Russia's traditional sphere of influence. And Philippe is naive to think that if any Russia-installed Ukrainian puppet government would have subsequently tried switching sides in order to avoid Yanukovych's fate, that Russia would not have immediately invaded Ukraine again right afterwards--or, alternatively, sponsored an internal coup in Ukraine in order to put someone more pliable and pro-Russian in power there.

    Replies: @Anatoly Karlin

  626. @Mr. XYZ
    @Gerard1234

    Would Polish cooperation have actually made the Anglo-French willing to fight for Czechoslovakia in 1938?

    And had Hitler genuinely been interested in the welfare of the Soviet people instead of merely exploiting them, allying with him would have been a great opportunity for Poland to realize its Promethean vision:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prometheism

    Of course, another way for Poland to save itself would have been an Anglo-Franco-Soviet alliance in 1939. This could have required the Anglo-French to agree to throw the Baltic countries under the Soviet bus, though.

    Replies: @Gerard1234

    As I implied before, if a Czechoslovakian-French-Soviet alliance was agreed in the mid-1930s, but Polish Nazis sabotaged the deal…….. then a Czechoslovakian-French-Polish agreement was fully possible, and more optimal than the other option. A much bigger industrial potential combined than Nazi Germany, combined armies and civilian population equal to or bigger than the Nazis, Nazis forced to fight a multi-front wars, with those fronts equidistant apart and impossible to prioritise as they could with Eastern Front against others. It would have been a permanent deterrent.

    Poland – France bilateral at the time should have made US-Israel now look like Armenia-Turkey relations by comparison, but they weren’t because Poles are serious f**k ups.

    As said by people several times before, giving the Nazis Czechoslovakia was equally as much West’s own form of “Lend Lease” to the Nazis. Without industrial regions of Czechoslovakia, then no potential for Nazis to invade USSR. That they did get it was also enabled by standard parasitic-Polish pussy-waraddict behaviour.

  627. @Mr. XYZ
    @Anatoly Karlin

    Out of curiosity: How do you intend to convince, say, a Canadian that your (or EHC's) proposed immigration policy is better than what Canada currently has? Canada accepts huge numbers of immigrants, especially per capita, each year, but does so with a focus on cognitive elites and their families (though there are also some refugees). If Canada--or any other Western country--will implement a UBI, wouldn't the size of this UBI depend on just how productive these countries are actually going to be per capita? Or is super-smart AI going to make productivity increase so much that the GDP per capita of Western countries is likely going to be in the millions of US dollars, if not in the tens of millions of US dollars, even if they are flooded with low-IQ immigrants by the hundreds of millions of more?

    If it's the latter scenario, then the West could potentially accept huge numbers of Third Worlders. Though there would still be issues with voting (super-smart AI won't be able to vote, right?), crime, and terrorism to consider. The crime part I guess can be somewhat dealt with by encouraging *voluntary* segregation and freedom of association, though good luck selling that to a Woke and anti-racist public. The terrorism issue is not a problem in a statistical sense per se but is a problem when it comes to murdering people who do things that noticeably provoke Muslims, such as engaging in "Islamophobic" speech. Another reason to be very selective about whom one is importing from the Muslim world and importing only Muslim reformists and Muslim cognitive elites and not low-IQ Muslim rightoids. Not everyone can live in a gated community or afford to hire great personal security 24/7, after all. As it is, Ayaan Hirsi Ali (a survivor of Muslim female genital mutilation) and a vehement critic of various backwards Islamic practices had to move from the Netherlands to the US because the security situation for her was better in the US relative to the Netherlands (less problematic Muslim population, for one).

    BTW, even applying out own logic about arbitrary scraps of land: There should be no problem with Ukraine ethnically cleansing Crimea and Donbass just so long as no one is killed, right? After all, these people can be resettled elsewhere, right? Crimea and Donbass are just arbitrary scraps of land, after all. So, why prolong the war over them?

    Replies: @Anatoly Karlin, @Mr. XYZ

    “BTW, even applying *your* own logic about arbitrary scraps of land: …”

    (Corrected typo. It’s “your”, not “out”.)

    As a side note, I find the horseshoe theory interesting:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horseshoe_theory#:~:text=In%20popular%20discourse%2C%20the%20horseshoe,a%20horseshoe%20are%20close%20together.

    The reason that I’m mentioning it here is because white nationalists/white supremacists and the Woke Left have some things in common. For instance, white nationalists and the Woke Left both support voluntary segregation, at least sometimes:

    https://www.nas.org/blogs/article/separate_but_equal_again_neo_segregation_at_yale

    https://joegarzacreates.medium.com/racial-segregation-is-only-acceptable-if-its-woke-apparently-dbb494feca26

    Similarly, historical white supremacists and the Woke Left both believe that non-East Asian people of color can only thrive and prosper when they are near a lot of whites. This was the historical justification for colonialism (a part of it, at least) and the current justification for open borders.

  628. @Sean
    @Ivashka the fool


    Dmitry Zapol’skyi who knew him well in the “Bandits’ Petersburg” era has written about him being known as Zhenechka the pedophile.
     
    The very same allegation that Alexander Litvinenko was poisoned for making about Putin.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

    Zapol’skyi died in Riga in 2021 from a heart attack. He had a lot of dirt on RF elites. He knew Putin in the very beginning if his Saint-Petersburg’s carrier, when Putin was the luggage carrying man for Sobchak the father. Putin’s was nicknamed the moth” (моль) back then. I remember Piter in these years, reading the book written by Zapol’skyi, entitled “Putinburg”, and his articles in Sputnik & Pogrom made me feel nostalgic.

    • Replies: @Sean
    @Ivashka the fool

    Putin had a knack of working his way into the confidences of a series of increasingly big shots and being accepted as a dog- loyal protégé, his gangster martial arts coach in his youth Usvyatsov and his uni law professor Subchak. Then Boris Berezovsky. A lot of these people later suffered untimely demises, but Russian men tend hit the vodka very hard.


    Litvinenko was a lying bastard about having video of Putin being a paedo (supposedly in the same hotel room the Skuratov komproat tape of was filmed. )A GRU pervert I could believe but the KGB were an elite whose candidates personal lives got losely examined and they were required to have no hint of abnormal sexual inclination that could make them vulnerable to recruitment by Western intel. Putin married in 1983. Moreover, two years later he was assigned to East Germany which was not the most high flying duty yet still sought after station for the a KGB man. They would not have sent him there if there was anything.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

  629. @Anatoly Karlin
    @Mr. XYZ


    Out of curiosity: How do you intend to convince, say, a Canadian that your (or EHC’s) proposed immigration policy is better than what Canada currently has?
     
    The first and main task is to set up successful network states that concentrate human and financial capital, by definition siphoning it from the nation-states (which is a net benefit, denuding as it does the enemy of EHC), and acquire land in the real world. This is already happening to some extent - see Zuzalu; Prospera.

    This would present an attractive alternate to the stifling tyranny of centralized states.

    These network states at least at first will be built around ideologies that find it difficult to find purchase in the real normie world. Life extensionists, AI people, crypto bros, etc. are the obvious first movers on account of their technophilia, but over time many other movements can embrace it - the idea is basically built for Dreher's Benedict Option.

    Given sufficient concentrations of EHC and financial capital, politicians and pundits can be inspired, persuaded, cajoled, or bribed to create special conditions for network state operations within their territories. As I mentioned above, the most obvious initial targets are geopolitically neutral weak small states in the Third World that need money and want to put themselves on the map.

    Banally, I suspect just amping up "ordinary" mass immigration would be a good way to destabilize the more dangerous big First World states (which will constitute a global threat to network states). Happily, this is congruent with EHC preferences (one of the things on which Ron Unz is unambiguously correct is that normies don't take r*ghtoid talking points on immigrants seriously).

    By accelerating a multicultural setting as default, this spurs some important dynamics:

    (1) Identitarians/ethno-nationalists who value ethno-cultural homogeneity, at some point, will go "fuck it, this shit is beyond saving" and defect from their societies. For instance, take prestigious London. Does any sane English identitarian see anything worth preserving there? The only problem is that there are no attractive choices now. Expating to Third World? Radical politics? Or they could defect to a nation-state, e.g. even one built around a racially homogenous (if that is the preference) neo-Victorian aesthetic that could be nicer than London ever was. It needn't be in the UK or even Europe.

    (2) Normies OK with multiculturalism and who are highly mobile on average would have no problems making the transition by default.

    The other, more purely economic dynamic is that by sucking in EHC, you deprive the First World centralized states of them, including much of the tax base. Meanwhile, the importation of less productive Third Worlders - to the extent that the "import the Third World, become the Third World" people are correct - will increase the fiscal burden on those states due to lower productivity, higher welfare demands, less trust, and more tax evasion. They will have to downsize, creating a void that will be filled by... you guessed it network states.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Ivashka the fool, @Mr. XYZ

    I think that the level of human capital that would be willing to defect from nation-states to network states would not be that large unless nation-states become total dumps, which even multicultural nation-states such as Canada are extremely eager to avoid. You could potentially see some alt-right/Trumpist types eventually seek to do this, for instance, but the problem remains that the alt-right/Trumpists don’t exactly represent the cognitive elites of the conservative movement. Here in the US, the cognitive elites of the conservative movement have a somewhat more favorable opinion of the mainstream Left (and ditto of the mainstream Left towards them) simply because they dislike some of the excesses of Trumpism, such as January 6 and Trump’s general corruption and arguable abuse of power.

    For network states to really be viable, you need an extraordinarily massive influx of EHC AND a huge population in general (at least eventually) that would be capable of effectively competing with the traditional nation-states (which also means having enough space and resources to sustain such a population). Israel isn’t a network state, but it is an example of a movement that got a lot of EHC to move to a place which previously didn’t have much of it and which subsequently made this place much nicer than it would have otherwise been. But Israel isn’t a giant geopolitical player along the lines of the US or EU or China or even India and won’t even be due to a lack of sufficient space and resources to sustain anywhere near as large of a population as any of these places have.

    And let’s imagine some other factors: If you want to create a neo-Victorian white ethnostate, for instance, how exactly are you going to do it in a majority non-white country? At the very least, even if the law will allow for this, will such a setting actually be convincing, so to speak? Are the whites there going to pretend to be a European colony in a non-white land in the colonial era, or what?

  630. @Anatoly Karlin
    @Mr. XYZ


    Elite human capital supported Communism a century ago, no?
     
    No.

    For that matter, why bother respecting private property?
     
    To not get arrested and imprisoned. Absence of centralized states does not imply absence of laws or regulations on particular territories.

    Third World countries aren’t very tolerant of secession, and if EHC will be keeping low human capital out of their new communities, then they will be accused of hypocrisy over their previous open borders stance.

    Crypto adoption is more advanced in the Third World in large part because there is a greater need for trustless systems.

    Their states are weaker too.

    I am bullish on the prospects for network states in the Third World. Montenegro, Uruguay, Honduras, El Salvador are lighting are way.

    Network states have existed throughout history and yet they didn’t completely eliminate nation-states.
     
    They existed in worlds in which tools for decentralized governance were non-existent. That is no longer the case.

    And you couldn’t have reached this conclusion before the start of that war? Before over 100,000 people needlessly lost their lives?

    The old models had to be invalidated. It is sad that East Slavs are again the main subjects, as with Communism, but such is the will of history.

    What made you so cavalierly dismiss the opinion of Russian EHC back then?
     
    The hostility of EHC to Russian nationalism and patriotism always nagged at me. I assumed it was a delusion, like their greater aversion to HBD, and had documented many specific instances in which they were simply factually wrong about Russia.

    However, in the generalities, EHC were roundly vindicated.

    This also implies they are correct broadly on pro-immigration, anti-racism, feminism, LGBT, Wokeness, etc., if not on some specifics.

    EHC will not be contained. 💯

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Mr. XYZ

    No.

    FWIW, I wasn’t talking about all EHC supporting it, but rather about it being a “breaking wave” idea among them. Communist support was not extraordinarily rare among Western intellectuals in the post-WWII period, for instance:

    https://www.transform-network.net/en/blog/article/communist-intellectuals-in-western-europe-a-comparative-study-of-france-austria-italy-and-the-uni/

    (You could say that several hundred intellectuals isn’t that much, but just how many intellectuals were there in these countries in total?)

    To not get arrested and imprisoned. Absence of centralized states does not imply absence of laws or regulations on particular territories.

    I meant having governments respect private property.

    Crypto adoption is more advanced in the Third World in large part because there is a greater need for trustless systems.

    Their states are weaker too.

    Third Worlders don’t like trust?

    And is the Third World in general very welcoming to low-IQ immigrants from other Third World countries?

    Obviously state power is weaker in the Third World; hence their mafia, drug cartel, et cetera problems, such as in Latin America.

    I am bullish on the prospects for network states in the Third World. Montenegro, Uruguay, Honduras, El Salvador are lighting are way.

    What does EU law say about this topic, if anything? Montenegro wants to eventually join the EU. How would that fit into things? Will it suck up a lot of the EU’s EHC? When one thinks about it, this would be the best of both worlds for Montenegro: Becoming a huge player in its own right AND joining a 500+ million-strong confederation.

    They existed in worlds in which tools for decentralized governance were non-existent. That is no longer the case.

    Interesting.

    The old models had to be invalidated. It is sad that East Slavs are again the main subjects, as with Communism, but such is the will of history.

    Yep, rather sad to see East Slavs be a laboratory for social experiments. First Communism and then Russian nationalism.

    The hostility of EHC to Russian nationalism and patriotism always nagged at me. I assumed it was a delusion, like their greater aversion to HBD, and had documented many specific instances in which they were simply factually wrong about Russia.

    Yeah, I first saw your work a decade or so ago and found it very interesting. Helped present a more accurate picture of Russia. I do think that for EHC, including Russian EHC, European nationalism is simply more attractive than Russian nationalism is. Much greater economies of scale, after all. A 500+ million-strong confederation (650+ million-strong with Russia) would inherently be more impressive than a 200+ million-strong confederation or even federation, after all. Russia had its chance for greatness in the 20th century but unfortunately blew it because no one was willing to kill Lenin early enough. (Though even in that scenario, I’d have still favored giving Ukraine, Central Asia, et cetera the option of secession referendums had they actually asked for it due to my own rejection of Russian imperialism. But core Russia would have still had 300 million people, which would have been much more impressive relative to real life.)

    However, in the generalities, EHC were roundly vindicated.

    This also implies they are correct broadly on pro-immigration, anti-racism, feminism, LGBT, Wokeness, etc., if not on some specifics.

    EHC will not be contained. 💯

    If EHC is always right, why has it failed to get the proles to agree to remove the natural-born citizen requirement for the US Presidency? AFAICT, EHC is almost universally hostile towards this requirement (and likely has been for decades), and yet due to prole opposition there has been no genuinely serious effort to remove this requirement, not even in the 21st century. The US is an outlier among developed countries in this regard. Other developed countries don’t have a natural-born citizen requirement for their leaders. Not even Germany. Not even after Hitler.

  631. @Greasy William
    @S

    I had never heard about the multi faith group trying to avoid the end times.

    Every major failed messiah claimant in history also had huge internal Jewish opposition. Certainly Zevi did. I don't see any messianic type figures out there right now.

    I do agree that it is preferable that people who think like me are kept far away from the levers of power. If I was Israeli PM I would just do everything I could to provoke Russia because I'm convinced a nuclear holocaust is inevitable so we might as well get it over with. I'm glad our leaders are at least trying to avoid that.

    My interpretation of Revelation is that it is a revenge fantasy of an unhinged and drug addled Jewish ultra nationalist. 666 is obviously a reference to Nero. I don't think the book has any prophetic value and I'm certainly not alone: it came very close to not being made part of the canon by the Church Fathers, Luther wanted to remove it (he also wanted to remove James but political reasons made it impossible to remove either) from the Bible and Calvin didn't even bother to write a commentary on it (after writing a commentary on every other book in both the Old Testament and the New).

    Replies: @S, @Greasy William

    Well, that’s not a very positive outlook. [Here I think you are trolling.]

    Not only am I not trolling, I thought you believed the same thing. You don’t believe there is going to be a massive, multi nation nuclear exchange within the next 10 to 20 years? Honestly, I could see it happening as early as 2027.

    • Replies: @S
    @Greasy William

    I think a nuclear conflagration is quite likely. It was the part about deliberately trying to hasten it so as to 'get it over with' which I thought was trolling.

    Apparently I was mistaken.

    Replies: @Greasy William

  632. @Another Polish Perspective
    @Wokechoke

    A paedophile cannot be Messiah. Even Chabad knows this.

    Replies: @Wokechoke

    Mohel’s all craw blood for children’s circumcisions.

  633. @Greasy William
    @Greasy William


    Well, that’s not a very positive outlook. [Here I think you are trolling.]
     
    Not only am I not trolling, I thought you believed the same thing. You don't believe there is going to be a massive, multi nation nuclear exchange within the next 10 to 20 years? Honestly, I could see it happening as early as 2027.

    Replies: @S

    I think a nuclear conflagration is quite likely. It was the part about deliberately trying to hasten it so as to ‘get it over with’ which I thought was trolling.

    Apparently I was mistaken.

    • Replies: @Greasy William
    @S

    If it's inevitable, why not just get it done with?

    Replies: @S

  634. @Yevardian
    @Anatoly Karlin


    Natalism is implicitly anti-feminist. EHC rejects natalism. However, EHC is much more open to positive eugenics.

    AIs are good but potentially dangerous. A biosingularity is safer.
     

    Alright with woke-incel 'It' latest Karlin-brand returning, its finally too much. Mental illness online is only tolerable when you can't picture the person behind it.
    With the increasing Jews-manipulating-my-bowels posting, the HBD/haplogroup circlejerks, redditposters and XYZ's spam, I'm following AnonFromTN and taking an indefinite break from this asylum again.
    Regards to Barbarossa, Bashibuzuk/Ivashka, Dmitry, Gerard, G_R, Mikel etc.

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @German_reader

    Your glass is half full.

    If it has nothing better to do than post here is that really a bad development? If you think this board is bad, just wait until you see some of the others.

    https://empslocal.ex.ac.uk/people/staff/mrwatkin/PKDick.htm

  635. @AP
    @songbird


    It may be that AP is a crypto-Turk who boosts Austria-Hungary and the Intermarium, as a cloak and disguise.
     
    Well, according to pan-Turkic nationalists, all Ukrainians are crypto-Turks. I had a friend in university about 30 years ago, from one of the ex-Soviet Turkic republics who was really into this idea, we had such a drunken geopolitical discussion. He was proclaiming that we are all Turks really, and that the Russians are our mutual enemies. He was a nephew of his country's president, and is now a high ranking government official, I am glad that his country supports Ukraine, such fantasies among Turks may be useful :-)

    And according to early modern Polish Sarmatists, all Polish nobles were crypto-Turks (they believed that they were descended from Sarmatians, and back then it was falsely believed that Sarmatians were Turkic people - we now know that Sarmatians were Iranic rather than Turkic). And this was at the time when Poles were always at war with the Turks. They thought of the conflict as religious more than ethnic.

    But in reality, I am less of a crypto-Turk than "wokechoke" is a crypto-Jew.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @Ivashka the fool, @songbird

    Sarmatians, and back then it was falsely believed that Sarmatians were Turkic people – we now know that Sarmatians were Iranic rather than Turkic)

    Аорс» (сарматское племя). От искаженного тюркского этнонима «орус»/ «урус». Среди сарматов были также тюркские племена — турки, гар — гары, онгары, дондары, камаки (кимаки, кумыки) и др. (Гейбуллаев, 1991, с. 336).

    http://grozan.ru/kavkaz-2/istoriya-balkarii-i-karachaya/sarmaty-i-gunny-predki-tyurkskix-narodov/

    Urus was later used by Turkic speaking peoples as an ethnonym for Rus. Moslem traders on Volga (Itil), who described their meeting with the early Rus, described them as being Turkic, also one should remember the Rus Khaganate and the fact that the Rurikid falling falcon (the Ukrainian Trizub) is actually a Tamga. One must also be aware that the Sargat Valley culture, which in its earliest form is seen as connected to early Sarmatians, is also connected to Eastern Scythians who became Turkic and their proto-Hungarian Uralic allies. The ancient Rus and the Magyar got along remarkably well. The ethnogenesis of the Eurasian Steppe nomadic confederations is quite convoluted. I know that you firmly believe in the Viking Rus hypothesis, but fact is the Moslem traders on Volga did unambiguously put them among the Turkic tribes. Perhaps because at the time they were the Khazar river fleet mercenaries and that their dress, haircut and tattoos were typically Turkic / Eastern Scythian.

  636. @Yevardian
    @Gerard1234


    Dumbass – literally the only thing scum as Hitler was not completely wrong on you are trying to criticise. The whole western world (effectively) supported Hitler taking Poland you dimwit.
     
    Seems likely. At what point, why and how do you think the "Phony-War" between Hitler and the Western powers became a real one?
    On what points and to what degree do you think Irving, Rezun, Unz or utu are/were wrong, and by malice, mistaken intepretations or willful self-deception?

    Replies: @Gerard1234

    Hi there!

    Just signing into a pact does not require a nations MIC to be at optimal level to launch and maintain a war at the moment the pact is activated by the invasion. It should signal intent to start preparing for one though, which is what happened. Defence expenditures of Britain and France prove it. “Phony War” period seems legitimate to me.

    All types of things with any type of twisted logik can be tried to be justified – like the British bombing ships of the French navy off the Algerian coast, killing 1 or 2 thousand French sailors so the Nazis could not capture them. Studying the opponents tactics and weapons systems in combat against your own ally in the pact for a period of time , so as to help with your own training and design & engineering of own planes, tanks, bombs etc….. even if your ally gets badly annihilated in that time over several months , is also legitimate action – particularly if you think you are going to be invaded next. Obviously we can see this with the “to the last ukrop” orders of the west in 404, where to some extent the G. S of each side is happy with the other introducing a new weapons system into the SMO (though every Russian weapon has increased its reputation)

    The issue here is at what point it clear that the Normandy landings by the west are for completely different political reasons to the point of the Pact…….. stopping the wonderful Red Army from liberating and taking all of Europe.

    Anyway, German oil ambitions /Italian imperialism in North Africa/ME against the British and French’s own oil interests is probably what started the end of the Phony War stage.

    Britain always going to want to engage in North African war, where it can maximise its Navy’s capabilities, with the conflict in the Mediterranean Sea to help army in the desert, far more than if engaged in continental war in France or Poland.

  637. @Anatoly Karlin
    @Mr. XYZ


    Out of curiosity: How do you intend to convince, say, a Canadian that your (or EHC’s) proposed immigration policy is better than what Canada currently has?
     
    The first and main task is to set up successful network states that concentrate human and financial capital, by definition siphoning it from the nation-states (which is a net benefit, denuding as it does the enemy of EHC), and acquire land in the real world. This is already happening to some extent - see Zuzalu; Prospera.

    This would present an attractive alternate to the stifling tyranny of centralized states.

    These network states at least at first will be built around ideologies that find it difficult to find purchase in the real normie world. Life extensionists, AI people, crypto bros, etc. are the obvious first movers on account of their technophilia, but over time many other movements can embrace it - the idea is basically built for Dreher's Benedict Option.

    Given sufficient concentrations of EHC and financial capital, politicians and pundits can be inspired, persuaded, cajoled, or bribed to create special conditions for network state operations within their territories. As I mentioned above, the most obvious initial targets are geopolitically neutral weak small states in the Third World that need money and want to put themselves on the map.

    Banally, I suspect just amping up "ordinary" mass immigration would be a good way to destabilize the more dangerous big First World states (which will constitute a global threat to network states). Happily, this is congruent with EHC preferences (one of the things on which Ron Unz is unambiguously correct is that normies don't take r*ghtoid talking points on immigrants seriously).

    By accelerating a multicultural setting as default, this spurs some important dynamics:

    (1) Identitarians/ethno-nationalists who value ethno-cultural homogeneity, at some point, will go "fuck it, this shit is beyond saving" and defect from their societies. For instance, take prestigious London. Does any sane English identitarian see anything worth preserving there? The only problem is that there are no attractive choices now. Expating to Third World? Radical politics? Or they could defect to a nation-state, e.g. even one built around a racially homogenous (if that is the preference) neo-Victorian aesthetic that could be nicer than London ever was. It needn't be in the UK or even Europe.

    (2) Normies OK with multiculturalism and who are highly mobile on average would have no problems making the transition by default.

    The other, more purely economic dynamic is that by sucking in EHC, you deprive the First World centralized states of them, including much of the tax base. Meanwhile, the importation of less productive Third Worlders - to the extent that the "import the Third World, become the Third World" people are correct - will increase the fiscal burden on those states due to lower productivity, higher welfare demands, less trust, and more tax evasion. They will have to downsize, creating a void that will be filled by... you guessed it network states.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Ivashka the fool, @Mr. XYZ

    Very interesting. Very well articulated. I have recently been thinking about the network states for Identitarians, but didn’t go that far in my reflection. Basically evolving social anthropology adopting new technologies and adapting to the Technosphere. Competing evolution of network states and post-national states / governments. Makes sense in the globalized future. Although I am pretty sure that TPTB will crush such attempts.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @Ivashka the fool

    The problem is that identitarians often have low human capital, no? Even the smarter rightists sometimes support multiculturalism, simply more of a merit-based flavor:

    https://foreignpolicy.com/2022/09/18/why-skills-based-immigration-is-the-best-option-for-america/

    https://www.nationalreview.com/2023/05/america-needs-a-merit-based-immigration-system/

    This is true even for Israeli identitarians. The more secular (and likely more intelligent, on average) Israelis are more likely to support allowing the "non-Jewish" grandchildren of Jews to immigrate to Israel.

    The life extensionists, cryptobros, transhumanists, AI people, et cetera could add valuable human capital to network states, but just how many such people actually are there? A network state with a smart fraction of several hundred or even several thousand people wouldn't be all that impressive in comparison to nation-states.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

    , @Anatoly Karlin
    @Ivashka the fool

    Funnily enough I met a Serb nationalist in Belgrade who had come to very similar ideas about creating a "Cloud Serbia".

    Nations that have ended up historical losers are I think obviously more receptive to these ideas and it's logical that their nationalists in particular could be icebreakers for this vision.


    Although I am pretty sure that TPTB will crush such attempts.
     
    A plurality of the world's major polities (US/EU/China/India) would have to ban decentralized smart contract cryptocurrencies to kill this off, which is possible, but not likely ATM.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Ivashka the fool

  638. @S
    @Greasy William

    I think a nuclear conflagration is quite likely. It was the part about deliberately trying to hasten it so as to 'get it over with' which I thought was trolling.

    Apparently I was mistaken.

    Replies: @Greasy William

    If it’s inevitable, why not just get it done with?

    • Replies: @S
    @Greasy William


    If it’s inevitable, why not just get it done with?
     
    That's your conclusion that it's 'inevitable'. I merely think it's highly 'likely'.

    I'd still allow for them to bungle it up and have it not happen, which I'd certainly prefer...ie best laid plans of mice and men and all that. :-)

    Replies: @Greasy William

  639. @Anatoly Karlin
    @Mr. XYZ


    Elite human capital supported Communism a century ago, no?
     
    No.

    For that matter, why bother respecting private property?
     
    To not get arrested and imprisoned. Absence of centralized states does not imply absence of laws or regulations on particular territories.

    Third World countries aren’t very tolerant of secession, and if EHC will be keeping low human capital out of their new communities, then they will be accused of hypocrisy over their previous open borders stance.

    Crypto adoption is more advanced in the Third World in large part because there is a greater need for trustless systems.

    Their states are weaker too.

    I am bullish on the prospects for network states in the Third World. Montenegro, Uruguay, Honduras, El Salvador are lighting are way.

    Network states have existed throughout history and yet they didn’t completely eliminate nation-states.
     
    They existed in worlds in which tools for decentralized governance were non-existent. That is no longer the case.

    And you couldn’t have reached this conclusion before the start of that war? Before over 100,000 people needlessly lost their lives?

    The old models had to be invalidated. It is sad that East Slavs are again the main subjects, as with Communism, but such is the will of history.

    What made you so cavalierly dismiss the opinion of Russian EHC back then?
     
    The hostility of EHC to Russian nationalism and patriotism always nagged at me. I assumed it was a delusion, like their greater aversion to HBD, and had documented many specific instances in which they were simply factually wrong about Russia.

    However, in the generalities, EHC were roundly vindicated.

    This also implies they are correct broadly on pro-immigration, anti-racism, feminism, LGBT, Wokeness, etc., if not on some specifics.

    EHC will not be contained. 💯

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Mr. XYZ

    BTW, in regards to multiculturalism specifically, I like the alt-centrist/California model of pan-enclavism:

    https://robertstark.substack.com/p/californias-future-of-pan-enclavism

    The US could have more generous immigration, of course, both of cognitive elites and working-classes, but generally immigration has worked out better for California than it has for, say, Western Europe. (It worked out even better for Canada but Canada imported less working-class people than California did, so overall California’s integration and assimilation record is more impressive adjusted for demographics, even though inevitable achievement gaps remain.)

    Would be interesting if you would ever be willing to write a blog post and/or article about Russia’s potential demographics in the 20th and 21st centuries without Communism. I don’t mean just total population (which you already covered with the 500 Million Russians article), but rather about the details, such as how a Central Asian mass migration to European Russia’s (incl. Ukraine’s and Belarus’s) cities would have looked like, whether Russia would have ever received any mass immigration from East Asia and/or South Asia, how the Russian people would have reacted to all of this without Communism, whether Russian Jews would have been as pro-immigration as their US counterparts, et cetera.

    In a separate blog post and/or article, you can also discuss whether an SR-led Russia would have ever been willing to go to war against Japan, such as in the 1930s and/or 1940s, in order to expel Japan from China and/or Korea and to stop the Japanese human rights abuses there.

    BTW, off-topic, but re: network states: As the example of Montenegro and the EU shows, a network state can theoretically exist within a much larger nation-state (or a much larger confederation that mimics a very decentralized nation-state, as with the EU). This could be a useful strategy: For instance, West Virginia can appeal to more traditionally-minded Americans to resettle there and build their own little version of paradise (white-opia) there, just so long as its advertising for this will not violate any US laws or the US Constitution. This could allow the US’s Woke elites to give US white nationalists a little piece of America for themselves to larp in while of course ensuring that they remain in the US and not move abroad. At the very least, it’s worth a shot.

    BTW, what’s the meaningful difference between network states and charter cities?

  640. @AP
    @Wokechoke

    Congratulations on having some of the most retarded takes of anyone here.


    The Poles have been trying to live rent free over assisting the Viennese in 1688 but conveniently airbrush out how they allied with the Turks again and again in the Black Sea.
     
    Poles and Turks were enemies in the late 15th century, allies in the 16th century, and at war in the 17th century.

    In the 17th century, the Poles and Ottomans fought five major wars against each other. Poles saved Europe from the Turk at Vienna, but a generation earlier a Polish-Ukrainian army had defeated an equally large Ottoman force on PLC territory.

    Historically, the closest European ally of the Ottoman Empire had been France rather than Poland.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franco-Ottoman_alliance

    The Franco-Ottoman Alliance, also known as the Franco-Turkish Alliance, was an alliance established in 1536 between the King of France Francis I and the Sultan of the Ottoman Empire Suleiman I. The strategic and sometimes tactical alliance was one of the longest-lasting and most important foreign alliances of France, and was particularly influential during the Italian Wars. The Franco-Ottoman military alliance reached its peak around 1553 during the reign Henry II of France.[1][2]

    As the first non-ideological alliance in effect between a Christian and Muslim state, the alliance attracted heavy controversy for its time and caused a scandal throughout Christendom.[3][4] Carl Jacob Burckhardt (1947) called it "the sacrilegious union of the lily and the crescent".[5] It lasted intermittently for more than two and a half centuries,[6] until the Napoleonic campaign in Ottoman Egypt, in 1798–1801.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    Historically, the closest European ally of the Ottoman Empire had been France rather than Poland.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franco-Ottoman_alliance

    The Franco-Ottoman Alliance, also known as the Franco-Turkish Alliance, was an alliance established in 1536 between the King of France Francis I and the Sultan of the Ottoman Empire Suleiman I. The strategic and sometimes tactical alliance was one of the longest-lasting and most important foreign alliances of France, and was particularly influential during the Italian Wars. The Franco-Ottoman military alliance reached its peak around 1553 during the reign Henry II of France.[1][2]

    As the first non-ideological alliance in effect between a Christian and Muslim state, the alliance attracted heavy controversy for its time and caused a scandal throughout Christendom.[3][4] Carl Jacob Burckhardt (1947) called it “the sacrilegious union of the lily and the crescent”.[5] It lasted intermittently for more than two and a half centuries,[6] until the Napoleonic campaign in Ottoman Egypt, in 1798–1801.

    France seems to have been eager to seek alliances with countries at Europe’s periphery: The Ottoman Empire, Russia, Poland, Czechoslovakia, Romania, Yugoslavia.

    Centuries beforehand, Franks (albeit less France itself) played a large role in fighting the Crusades in the Near East.

    • Replies: @Sean
    @Mr. XYZ


    Just after the ‘Beeldenstorm’, in October 1566, Joseph Nasi, a Jewish friend of Orange from Antwerp who had fled from the Inquisition and now worked for the Sultan, arranged for a letter from Süleyman I promising the Netherlands financial and military support. Due to the demise of Süleyman I at the end of the same year, and the attack on the Ottoman Empire by the Ivan the Terrible in 1568, the aid had to wait until 1574.

    In that year, Sultan Selim II sent a special agent to establish communication between the Dutch, the Moriscos of Spain, and the Turkish corsairs in Algiers. In October, the Dutch attacked the Spanish in Leiden, wearing the crescent medallions and flying Ottoman flags on their ships, to terrify the Spanish into thinking the Turks had come all the way North. At exactly the same time, Selim II attacked Tunis, leaving Philip in the panic of a war on two fronts. The collaboration was succesful, as both battles were won. [...] Elisabeth of England urged Sultan Murat III to attack Philip’s giant Armada in 1588, but Jerry Brotton has in my view still to supply evidence for his tempting assertion that ‘Ottoman fleet movements in the eastern Mediterranean fatally split Philip II’s Armada’. In any case, the Armada was defeated by the breath of the Almighty: a fierce storm wrecked the entire fleet on the coasts of Northern Europe.

    The Dutch were in 1610 again negotiating with Morocco for a joint attack on Spain by Morocco, the Netherlands, and the Ottoman Sultan. Philip III refers to the contacts between the Moriscos and his ‘enemies in the North’ in the Edict of the Expulsion of the Moors, of 1609.This is an excerpt from the article ‘Let the Muslim be my Master in Outward Things!’ References to Islam in the Promotion of Religious Tolerance in Christian Europe
     
    In the Thirty Years war Catholic France was in an alliance against the Holy Roman Empire. " The Swedish Intervention, with the open aid of France, signaled the end of the internal religious war and the beginning of an international political war'. The Emperor's greatest general, Wallenstein, had many Protestants in his army, including a number of important commanders. Prigozhin is a sort of Wallenstein figure I think.
  641. German_reader says:
    @Yevardian
    @Anatoly Karlin


    Natalism is implicitly anti-feminist. EHC rejects natalism. However, EHC is much more open to positive eugenics.

    AIs are good but potentially dangerous. A biosingularity is safer.
     

    Alright with woke-incel 'It' latest Karlin-brand returning, its finally too much. Mental illness online is only tolerable when you can't picture the person behind it.
    With the increasing Jews-manipulating-my-bowels posting, the HBD/haplogroup circlejerks, redditposters and XYZ's spam, I'm following AnonFromTN and taking an indefinite break from this asylum again.
    Regards to Barbarossa, Bashibuzuk/Ivashka, Dmitry, Gerard, G_R, Mikel etc.

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @German_reader

    Yeah, I’ve got enough of this shitshow myself. Iirc you’ve got my mail in case you want to stay in touch.

    • Replies: @Yevardian
    @German_reader

    Well, everything comes to an end eventually. You'll have to send it again.

    Dunno if Mr Unz has yet noticed Karlin's would-be-shocking (shockingly banal, maybe) "transition", but if he has, it might be a sign to close Karlin's legacy Open Threads down.
    Presumably that is "Its" goal in coming here.
    Final galaxybrain take: XYZ is actually Karlin's former (???) Oliver D Smith, reconciled again in 'neurodiversity', working with Karlin (notice the lack of posting limit?) to erase "Its" wrongthink past.

    @GermanReader

    Must have accidently deleted message when cleaning it out (I made that throwaway email specifically for signing up for BS promos etc.), so you'll have to send it again the @burner19482010@gmail

    Replies: @Anatoly Karlin

  642. @Ivashka the fool
    @Anatoly Karlin

    Very interesting. Very well articulated. I have recently been thinking about the network states for Identitarians, but didn't go that far in my reflection. Basically evolving social anthropology adopting new technologies and adapting to the Technosphere. Competing evolution of network states and post-national states / governments. Makes sense in the globalized future. Although I am pretty sure that TPTB will crush such attempts.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Anatoly Karlin

    The problem is that identitarians often have low human capital, no? Even the smarter rightists sometimes support multiculturalism, simply more of a merit-based flavor:

    https://foreignpolicy.com/2022/09/18/why-skills-based-immigration-is-the-best-option-for-america/

    https://www.nationalreview.com/2023/05/america-needs-a-merit-based-immigration-system/

    This is true even for Israeli identitarians. The more secular (and likely more intelligent, on average) Israelis are more likely to support allowing the “non-Jewish” grandchildren of Jews to immigrate to Israel.

    The life extensionists, cryptobros, transhumanists, AI people, et cetera could add valuable human capital to network states, but just how many such people actually are there? A network state with a smart fraction of several hundred or even several thousand people wouldn’t be all that impressive in comparison to nation-states.

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @Mr. XYZ


    The problem is that identitarians often have low human capital, no?
     
    No.

    A network state with a smart fraction of several hundred or even several thousand people wouldn’t be all that impressive in comparison to nation-states.
     
    What is more impressive, the Golden Horde or the Yersinia pestis bacterium?

    https://doaj.org/article/e70dbdfe3e624f5d960a759401895ced

    Small is beautiful...

    BTW, as I previously commented, a network state is just a well organized diaspora. Network states existed since antiquity, think of Manichaean or Ismaili networks or of the Jewish communities. Interestingly, the three examples I just mentioned are the result of partial Globalization of their era. Today, we live in a much more globalized world, it makes sense to form networks similar to what the ancients did. The goal is similar, it is just the technology that changes and allows for better information transfer making things much easier to organize and manage.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

  643. @Mr. XYZ
    @Ivashka the fool

    The problem is that identitarians often have low human capital, no? Even the smarter rightists sometimes support multiculturalism, simply more of a merit-based flavor:

    https://foreignpolicy.com/2022/09/18/why-skills-based-immigration-is-the-best-option-for-america/

    https://www.nationalreview.com/2023/05/america-needs-a-merit-based-immigration-system/

    This is true even for Israeli identitarians. The more secular (and likely more intelligent, on average) Israelis are more likely to support allowing the "non-Jewish" grandchildren of Jews to immigrate to Israel.

    The life extensionists, cryptobros, transhumanists, AI people, et cetera could add valuable human capital to network states, but just how many such people actually are there? A network state with a smart fraction of several hundred or even several thousand people wouldn't be all that impressive in comparison to nation-states.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

    The problem is that identitarians often have low human capital, no?

    No.

    A network state with a smart fraction of several hundred or even several thousand people wouldn’t be all that impressive in comparison to nation-states.

    What is more impressive, the Golden Horde or the Yersinia pestis bacterium?

    https://doaj.org/article/e70dbdfe3e624f5d960a759401895ced

    Small is beautiful…

    BTW, as I previously commented, a network state is just a well organized diaspora. Network states existed since antiquity, think of Manichaean or Ismaili networks or of the Jewish communities. Interestingly, the three examples I just mentioned are the result of partial Globalization of their era. Today, we live in a much more globalized world, it makes sense to form networks similar to what the ancients did. The goal is similar, it is just the technology that changes and allows for better information transfer making things much easier to organize and manage.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @Ivashka the fool


    No.
     
    https://www.unz.com/akarlin/the-rights-human-capital-problem/

    What is more impressive, the Golden Horde or the Yersinia pestis bacterium?

    https://doaj.org/article/e70dbdfe3e624f5d960a759401895ced

    Small is beautiful…

    BTW, as I previously commented, a network state is just a well organized diaspora. Network states existed since antiquity, think of Manichaean or Ismaili networks or of the Jewish communities. Interestingly, the three examples I just mentioned are the result of partial Globalization of their era. Today, we live in a much more globalized world, it makes sense to form networks similar to what the ancients did. The goal is similar, it is just the technology that changes and allows for better information transfer making things much easier to organize and manage.
     

    I guess that the network state equivalent of the bacterium that caused the Black Death would be a network state made up of Nobel Prize winners plus Fields Medal winners and the like. That would be a truly accomplished network state, though even there there would be regression towards the mean for one generation. A network state like that actually could punch significantly above its weight. Just like Ashkenazi Jews significantly punch above their weight when it comes to their achievements, as do Hajnal Europeans, to a lesser extent.
  644. @Ivashka the fool
    @Sean

    Zapol'skyi died in Riga in 2021 from a heart attack. He had a lot of dirt on RF elites. He knew Putin in the very beginning if his Saint-Petersburg's carrier, when Putin was the luggage carrying man for Sobchak the father. Putin's was nicknamed the moth" (моль) back then. I remember Piter in these years, reading the book written by Zapol'skyi, entitled "Putinburg", and his articles in Sputnik & Pogrom made me feel nostalgic.

    Replies: @Sean

    Putin had a knack of working his way into the confidences of a series of increasingly big shots and being accepted as a dog- loyal protégé, his gangster martial arts coach in his youth Usvyatsov and his uni law professor Subchak. Then Boris Berezovsky. A lot of these people later suffered untimely demises, but Russian men tend hit the vodka very hard.

    Litvinenko was a lying bastard about having video of Putin being a paedo (supposedly in the same hotel room the Skuratov komproat tape of was filmed. )A GRU pervert I could believe but the KGB were an elite whose candidates personal lives got losely examined and they were required to have no hint of abnormal sexual inclination that could make them vulnerable to recruitment by Western intel. Putin married in 1983. Moreover, two years later he was assigned to East Germany which was not the most high flying duty yet still sought after station for the a KGB man. They would not have sent him there if there was anything.

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @Sean

    I never wrote about Pynya being a perv. Although he was frolicking around while married, most probably he was the one who inseminated the BND agent "Balcony" Anchen that was close friends with Lyudmila and him. His son would be now a grown-up man in Germany. And I believe Zapol'skyi when he says that he saw a video of a man looking like Pynya giving a matchbox to a BND agent in a park in Dresden in 1989. It is not a well known fact, but Pynya was discharged from the KGB in 1990, and that was not because he left the CPSU as he claims. That's why we was driving a taxi in Piter before being picked up by Sobchak. My hypothesis is that his German contacts in the BND helped getting him in the right place. Piter was the place to be at the time, the most active RF sea port for trade with Germany. Sobchak had a lot of foreign friends but he was not a practical man, he needed a more crafty individual capable of doing the dirty work.

    Replies: @Sean

  645. @Anatoly Karlin
    @Mr. XYZ


    Out of curiosity: How do you intend to convince, say, a Canadian that your (or EHC’s) proposed immigration policy is better than what Canada currently has?
     
    The first and main task is to set up successful network states that concentrate human and financial capital, by definition siphoning it from the nation-states (which is a net benefit, denuding as it does the enemy of EHC), and acquire land in the real world. This is already happening to some extent - see Zuzalu; Prospera.

    This would present an attractive alternate to the stifling tyranny of centralized states.

    These network states at least at first will be built around ideologies that find it difficult to find purchase in the real normie world. Life extensionists, AI people, crypto bros, etc. are the obvious first movers on account of their technophilia, but over time many other movements can embrace it - the idea is basically built for Dreher's Benedict Option.

    Given sufficient concentrations of EHC and financial capital, politicians and pundits can be inspired, persuaded, cajoled, or bribed to create special conditions for network state operations within their territories. As I mentioned above, the most obvious initial targets are geopolitically neutral weak small states in the Third World that need money and want to put themselves on the map.

    Banally, I suspect just amping up "ordinary" mass immigration would be a good way to destabilize the more dangerous big First World states (which will constitute a global threat to network states). Happily, this is congruent with EHC preferences (one of the things on which Ron Unz is unambiguously correct is that normies don't take r*ghtoid talking points on immigrants seriously).

    By accelerating a multicultural setting as default, this spurs some important dynamics:

    (1) Identitarians/ethno-nationalists who value ethno-cultural homogeneity, at some point, will go "fuck it, this shit is beyond saving" and defect from their societies. For instance, take prestigious London. Does any sane English identitarian see anything worth preserving there? The only problem is that there are no attractive choices now. Expating to Third World? Radical politics? Or they could defect to a nation-state, e.g. even one built around a racially homogenous (if that is the preference) neo-Victorian aesthetic that could be nicer than London ever was. It needn't be in the UK or even Europe.

    (2) Normies OK with multiculturalism and who are highly mobile on average would have no problems making the transition by default.

    The other, more purely economic dynamic is that by sucking in EHC, you deprive the First World centralized states of them, including much of the tax base. Meanwhile, the importation of less productive Third Worlders - to the extent that the "import the Third World, become the Third World" people are correct - will increase the fiscal burden on those states due to lower productivity, higher welfare demands, less trust, and more tax evasion. They will have to downsize, creating a void that will be filled by... you guessed it network states.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Ivashka the fool, @Mr. XYZ

    (1) Identitarians/ethno-nationalists who value ethno-cultural homogeneity, at some point, will go “fuck it, this shit is beyond saving” and defect from their societies.

    Maybe, but would the types who are particularly eager to do that be of particularly high human capital to begin with? You yourself have previously said that nationalism suffers from a low human capital problem in much of the world other than, of course, in Ukraine. This suggests that the exodus of the more nationalistic elements, especially the duller ones, among the European/white populations of the developed world would not necessarily be viewed as a bad thing by our Woke elites.

    Meanwhile, the importation of less productive Third Worlders – to the extent that the “import the Third World, become the Third World” people are correct – will increase the fiscal burden on those states due to lower productivity, higher welfare demands, less trust, and more tax evasion. They will have to downsize, creating a void that will be filled by… you guessed it network states.

    That’s why any reasonably sane and self-interested nation-state would primarily seek to import the Third World’s cognitive elites and only then worry about their working-classes, other than in truly exceptional circumstances (genuine refugees and/or witness protection in order to protect people from dangerous and vengeful drug lords, for instance).

    BTW, before your recent conversion, did you not view a super-powerful Russia (one that includes both Ukraine and Belarus) as a threat to network states? A super-powerful Russia, had it actually been realized, could have also been quite a formidable threat to network states, no? At least on the scale of a hypothetical surviving Japanese Empire that would have permanently kept both South Korea and Taiwan, since then their populations, at around 200 million, would have been roughly comparable. And Russia strikes me as having rather authoritarian and even totalitarian tendencies even in comparison to the West (at least the US), albeit obviously considerably less so relative to the USSR:

    https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-50902496

    Our Woke press and government might lie a lot about racial questions, but still allow one to find the truth if one searches well/deeply enough, as well as to look at non-Western websites, even those from hostile countries.

    BTW, if elite human capital is always right, then when is elite human capital finally going to make paying child support voluntary and optional?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paper_abortion

    Some intellectuals have already supported this idea, especially those of a liberal and libertarian persuasion. Cathy Young, for instance.

    BTW, what are your thoughts on Philippe Lemoine’s argument that the West should have simply thrown Ukraine under the bus and subsequently sponsored an anti-Russian insurgency there ‘coz doing so is cheaper than sponsoring a conventional Ukrainian war effort against Russia and that since doing so would piss off Russia to a lesser extent than sponsoring a conventional Ukrainian war effort would?

    https://www.philippelemoine.com/p/the-case-against-western-military

    I think that his argument is naive because in regards to Ukraine, Russia likely has a very high pain tolerance that can quite possibly be reached by a successful Ukrainian conventional war effort but not by a Ukrainian insurgency. In order to get the French from Algeria, 150,000 FLN troops had to lose their lives beforehand, as did between 25,000 and 30,000 French troops and 6,000 French civilians. Without their government quite literally forcing them to fight, I don’t see Ukrainians voluntarily being willing to endure those kinds of losses in order to drive Russia out of Ukraine, and anything less might not be enough, in which case Russia would have stayed in Ukraine indefinitely. (Philippe is naive in thinking that Russia would be open to a negotiated settlement in the event of a successful Russian conquest of Ukraine if Russian losses afterwards as a result of a subsequent Ukrainian insurgency simply won’t be high enough to teach Russia’s pain tolerance limit.) I also don’t see Russia being all that much friendlier with the West if the West will let Russia conquer Ukraine but then try sponsoring an anti-Russian insurgency in Ukraine; Russia will still view such a Western move as an extremely hostile anti-Russian act (especially if this Ukrainian insurgency will result in anti-Russian terrorist attacks, including in Russia proper) and as continued aggressive Western meddling in Russia’s traditional sphere of influence. And Philippe is naive to think that if any Russia-installed Ukrainian puppet government would have subsequently tried switching sides in order to avoid Yanukovych’s fate, that Russia would not have immediately invaded Ukraine again right afterwards–or, alternatively, sponsored an internal coup in Ukraine in order to put someone more pliable and pro-Russian in power there.

    • Replies: @Anatoly Karlin
    @Mr. XYZ


    Maybe, but would the types who are particularly eager to do that be of particularly high human capital to begin with?
     
    Nationalist EHC will be first to defect from its own societies to recreate an "imagined past" of their culture in network states with "aligned" co-ideologists.

    https://twitter.com/powerfultakes/status/1617559733266776064

    (I do not claim to be EHC. I am merely an "object", a "thing", or a "whatever" that tries to observe and study EHC. However, I could certainly see myself holding an NFT denoting membership of a transhumanist-themed and a Tsarpunk-themed transnational network state; considering cosmism originated in the latter, they would not even be contradictory).

    In fact, this will arguably be a self-reinforcing process, to the extent that these dynamics suck away oxygen and EHC from nationalist/identitarian organizations rooted within and playing by the rules of the traditional nation-state. They are going to become even less prestigious than they are today.

    BTW, before your recent conversion, did you not view a super-powerful Russia (one that includes both Ukraine and Belarus) as a threat to network states?
     
    One of the bullish factors for network states is that many of the Great Powers are genuinely spiteful towards each other and will forge alliances of convenience with network states, proverbially selling us the rope with which we'll hang them. "Many such cases" historically.

    Regarding myself personally - I have never hid my contempt towards small nation nationalisms, which are parochial by definition.

    Alternate history scenarios aside, Russia has proven itself a "small" nation, its memes totally Americanized and ruinously so, continuing being a classic Russian nationalist at this point is only slightly less risible than being, say, a Polish or Romanian or even Ukrainian nationalist. I still retain my viewpoint that there is no reason for cultures that do not appear as playable factions in the Civilization games to exist. So for me this "transition" is both logical and at this point very psychologically easy.

    The only nationalisms that still make sense are American, Chinese, and perhaps Indian but they all come with their own thicket of issues. It's hard to reconcile with American multiculturalism and innately universalist characteristics (there's a reason why any true American nationalism defaults to White Nationalism which is both universal and transracial), with the Fourteen Principles of Xi Jinping Thought, with Indians basically being this melange of peoples who are as differentiated from each other as Europeans.

    French, German, etc. nationalism don't make any sense either at this point, despite their once formidable cultures. Visit London or Paris. All very bullish for network states.

    Replies: @songbird, @Mr. XYZ, @Ivashka the fool, @Mr. XYZ

  646. @Emil Nikola Richard
    @LatW

    Apparently Belarus is number one in per capita potato consumption.

    https://i.redd.it/ns0mhkcusl8b1.png

    Replies: @LatW

    Apparently Belarus is number one in per capita potato consumption.

    Nothing wrong with that, I was just trying to make a joke about how Luka, this old fox, so often talks as if he is some simple country dude (which in combination with his hick-like accent comes off somewhat believable – and totally chad-like).

    Yea, nothing special here, just a few Wagnerites living in that Soviet era high rise next door. 🙂 These fine fellows have been on a couple of tours in Syria and in Donbass, other than that they are totally normal. 🙂

    If it has nothing better to do than post here is that really a bad development?

    And you gotta admit that it is pretty creative to pronounce oneself as “post-masculine” while a draft is taking place. A fantastic way out. “I’m post-masculine, do not count me in” – priceless. Might be even more effective than throwing Molotov cocktails at army recruitment centers. From what I’ve heard, back in the Soviet times, one had to go to great lengths to “prove” that one is “crazy” or mentally unstable, in order to avoid military service. But these days claiming you’re “post-masculine” may not be considered crazy or a mental condition. So may or may not work.

    And, by the way, how is “elite human capital” defined? Cognitive elites is understandable, but EHC sounds like it could be something much, much broader. What about beautiful but average IQ people? What about super smart and quirky people who are not conscientious enough to follow all social norms but are otherwise fantastic people? What about crazy artists? What about mediocre and spoiled offspring of cognitive elites (even eugenics and perfect parenting doesn’t guarantee an ideal outcome)? Etc, etc. How is this EHC really defined?

    • Agree: Ivashka the fool
    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @LatW


    And, by the way, how is “elite human capital” defined? Cognitive elites is understandable, but EHC sounds like it could be something much, much broader. What about beautiful but average IQ people? What about super smart and quirky people who are not conscientious enough to follow all social norms but are otherwise fantastic people? What about crazy artists? What about mediocre and spoiled offspring of cognitive elites (even eugenics and perfect parenting doesn’t guarantee an ideal outcome)? Etc, etc. How is this EHC really defined?
     
    Elite human capital primarily refers to smart and intellectually accomplished people. Though I suppose that a broader definition of this term could also include people who are not smart but still accomplished through non-intellectual pursuits, such as sports or fashion/modeling or music. These people would not be cognitive elites but they would still be elites.

    There are plenty of great and decent people who are not elite, no doubt about that. These people are the bedrock of nations. For instance, during WWII, elite human capital built the technology and did the military planning while ordinary folks did the actual fighting (though some of the younger elites also fought as a matter of honor).

    Then there are people whom society can do without, except as memes:

    https://vdare.com/public_upload/publication/featured_image/34597/whynotshantavious.jpg

    In Russian, his name would literally be translated as Govnyuk Povar.
    , @Coconuts
    @LatW


    And, by the way, how is “elite human capital” defined?
     
    I thought it meant the ruling elite.

    If elite theory is correct they will have various people producing the political formula which explains their power. Elite circulation is a constant thing though, so the composition of the elite will change over time. Also the political formulas will change.

    Replies: @LatW

    , @Emil Nikola Richard
    @LatW


    And, by the way, how is “elite human capital” defined?
     
    In June 2023 in my view the most salient feature is they have outsourced their body's immune system to World Economic Forum goons.

    Where do you think the omicron came from?
  647. @Ivashka the fool
    @Mr. XYZ


    The problem is that identitarians often have low human capital, no?
     
    No.

    A network state with a smart fraction of several hundred or even several thousand people wouldn’t be all that impressive in comparison to nation-states.
     
    What is more impressive, the Golden Horde or the Yersinia pestis bacterium?

    https://doaj.org/article/e70dbdfe3e624f5d960a759401895ced

    Small is beautiful...

    BTW, as I previously commented, a network state is just a well organized diaspora. Network states existed since antiquity, think of Manichaean or Ismaili networks or of the Jewish communities. Interestingly, the three examples I just mentioned are the result of partial Globalization of their era. Today, we live in a much more globalized world, it makes sense to form networks similar to what the ancients did. The goal is similar, it is just the technology that changes and allows for better information transfer making things much easier to organize and manage.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    No.

    https://www.unz.com/akarlin/the-rights-human-capital-problem/

    What is more impressive, the Golden Horde or the Yersinia pestis bacterium?

    https://doaj.org/article/e70dbdfe3e624f5d960a759401895ced

    Small is beautiful…

    BTW, as I previously commented, a network state is just a well organized diaspora. Network states existed since antiquity, think of Manichaean or Ismaili networks or of the Jewish communities. Interestingly, the three examples I just mentioned are the result of partial Globalization of their era. Today, we live in a much more globalized world, it makes sense to form networks similar to what the ancients did. The goal is similar, it is just the technology that changes and allows for better information transfer making things much easier to organize and manage.

    I guess that the network state equivalent of the bacterium that caused the Black Death would be a network state made up of Nobel Prize winners plus Fields Medal winners and the like. That would be a truly accomplished network state, though even there there would be regression towards the mean for one generation. A network state like that actually could punch significantly above its weight. Just like Ashkenazi Jews significantly punch above their weight when it comes to their achievements, as do Hajnal Europeans, to a lesser extent.

  648. @LatW
    @Emil Nikola Richard


    Apparently Belarus is number one in per capita potato consumption.
     
    Nothing wrong with that, I was just trying to make a joke about how Luka, this old fox, so often talks as if he is some simple country dude (which in combination with his hick-like accent comes off somewhat believable - and totally chad-like).

    Yea, nothing special here, just a few Wagnerites living in that Soviet era high rise next door. :) These fine fellows have been on a couple of tours in Syria and in Donbass, other than that they are totally normal. :)


    If it has nothing better to do than post here is that really a bad development?
     
    And you gotta admit that it is pretty creative to pronounce oneself as "post-masculine" while a draft is taking place. A fantastic way out. "I'm post-masculine, do not count me in" - priceless. Might be even more effective than throwing Molotov cocktails at army recruitment centers. From what I've heard, back in the Soviet times, one had to go to great lengths to "prove" that one is "crazy" or mentally unstable, in order to avoid military service. But these days claiming you're "post-masculine" may not be considered crazy or a mental condition. So may or may not work.

    And, by the way, how is "elite human capital" defined? Cognitive elites is understandable, but EHC sounds like it could be something much, much broader. What about beautiful but average IQ people? What about super smart and quirky people who are not conscientious enough to follow all social norms but are otherwise fantastic people? What about crazy artists? What about mediocre and spoiled offspring of cognitive elites (even eugenics and perfect parenting doesn't guarantee an ideal outcome)? Etc, etc. How is this EHC really defined?

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Coconuts, @Emil Nikola Richard

    And, by the way, how is “elite human capital” defined? Cognitive elites is understandable, but EHC sounds like it could be something much, much broader. What about beautiful but average IQ people? What about super smart and quirky people who are not conscientious enough to follow all social norms but are otherwise fantastic people? What about crazy artists? What about mediocre and spoiled offspring of cognitive elites (even eugenics and perfect parenting doesn’t guarantee an ideal outcome)? Etc, etc. How is this EHC really defined?

    Elite human capital primarily refers to smart and intellectually accomplished people. Though I suppose that a broader definition of this term could also include people who are not smart but still accomplished through non-intellectual pursuits, such as sports or fashion/modeling or music. These people would not be cognitive elites but they would still be elites.

    There are plenty of great and decent people who are not elite, no doubt about that. These people are the bedrock of nations. For instance, during WWII, elite human capital built the technology and did the military planning while ordinary folks did the actual fighting (though some of the younger elites also fought as a matter of honor).

    Then there are people whom society can do without, except as memes:

    In Russian, his name would literally be translated as Govnyuk Povar.

  649. BTW, so long as AI will not fully replace elite human capital, I see absolutely nothing wrong with *eugenically* encouraging pro-natalism (if pro-natalism appears misogynistic, it’s simply because of biological differences between men and women rather than as a result of animus towards women). In the post-WWII era, a public shift in pro-natalist attitudes for a couple of decades resulted in a huge baby boom in the US and also in some other Western countries. For the US:

    AFAIK, this baby boom was not dysgenic, or at least not very strongly dysgenic. To my knowledge, smart people were also having a lot of kids back then. And since the US and other Hajnal Line and Hajnal-descended countries are very accomplished, this meant that there would be more accomplished people born in the 1940s, 1950s, and 1960s than would have otherwise been the case, thus making this huge baby boom a net gain to all of humanity.

  650. S says:
    @Greasy William
    @S

    If it's inevitable, why not just get it done with?

    Replies: @S

    If it’s inevitable, why not just get it done with?

    That’s your conclusion that it’s ‘inevitable’. I merely think it’s highly ‘likely’.

    I’d still allow for them to bungle it up and have it not happen, which I’d certainly prefer…ie best laid plans of mice and men and all that. 🙂

    • Replies: @Greasy William
    @S

    You may be right. Given that the only people (besides me) who seem to take these Jewish prophecies seriously are unhinged Evangelical Christians maybe we shouldn't assume anything is inevitable

  651. @S
    @Greasy William


    If it’s inevitable, why not just get it done with?
     
    That's your conclusion that it's 'inevitable'. I merely think it's highly 'likely'.

    I'd still allow for them to bungle it up and have it not happen, which I'd certainly prefer...ie best laid plans of mice and men and all that. :-)

    Replies: @Greasy William

    You may be right. Given that the only people (besides me) who seem to take these Jewish prophecies seriously are unhinged Evangelical Christians maybe we shouldn’t assume anything is inevitable

  652. If one views the opinions of elite human capital as being superior to everyone else’s, then one can argue that the collapse of the USSR was significantly more preordained than people thought and that thus Russians, including Russian nationalists, are fools to mourn the USSR’s demise. My evidence for this is that already in March 1991, Ukraine’s elite human capital (in Kiev and Galicia, the two smartest parts of Ukraine) voted against keeping the Soviet Union:

    So, for so long as the USSR would have become free and remained free for a sufficiently long time period, Ukraine had decent odds of eventually becoming independent. The August 1991 coup attempt simply considerably accelerated the pace of events. But Ukraine’s elite human capital were already won over to the idea of Ukrainian independence even beforehand, and they could have eventually won over more and more of the Ukrainian masses to this idea even without the August 1991 coup attempt.

  653. @LatW
    @Emil Nikola Richard


    Apparently Belarus is number one in per capita potato consumption.
     
    Nothing wrong with that, I was just trying to make a joke about how Luka, this old fox, so often talks as if he is some simple country dude (which in combination with his hick-like accent comes off somewhat believable - and totally chad-like).

    Yea, nothing special here, just a few Wagnerites living in that Soviet era high rise next door. :) These fine fellows have been on a couple of tours in Syria and in Donbass, other than that they are totally normal. :)


    If it has nothing better to do than post here is that really a bad development?
     
    And you gotta admit that it is pretty creative to pronounce oneself as "post-masculine" while a draft is taking place. A fantastic way out. "I'm post-masculine, do not count me in" - priceless. Might be even more effective than throwing Molotov cocktails at army recruitment centers. From what I've heard, back in the Soviet times, one had to go to great lengths to "prove" that one is "crazy" or mentally unstable, in order to avoid military service. But these days claiming you're "post-masculine" may not be considered crazy or a mental condition. So may or may not work.

    And, by the way, how is "elite human capital" defined? Cognitive elites is understandable, but EHC sounds like it could be something much, much broader. What about beautiful but average IQ people? What about super smart and quirky people who are not conscientious enough to follow all social norms but are otherwise fantastic people? What about crazy artists? What about mediocre and spoiled offspring of cognitive elites (even eugenics and perfect parenting doesn't guarantee an ideal outcome)? Etc, etc. How is this EHC really defined?

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Coconuts, @Emil Nikola Richard

    And, by the way, how is “elite human capital” defined?

    I thought it meant the ruling elite.

    If elite theory is correct they will have various people producing the political formula which explains their power. Elite circulation is a constant thing though, so the composition of the elite will change over time. Also the political formulas will change.

    • Replies: @LatW
    @Coconuts


    I thought it meant the ruling elite.
     
    EHC will often be the elite, but is the elite always EHC? I was wondering if these network states will only contain EHC, and then how is that defined (and even more importantly, maintained).

    Elite circulation is a constant thing though, so the composition of the elite will change over time.
     

    It's always been the case, especially now, but there have always been academic networks and executives often operate internationally anyway.

    So in a way, one can say that these large globalized companies are already like networks, maybe they are not states, but they do often have their own culture, own goals (not just business goals, but also social impact related which they themselves decide on). It's only a matter where this becomes "political" and also how the ownership part is handled (taxes, properties).

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

  654. Poor Mark Ames and Yasha Levine overview:

  655. @Ivashka the fool
    @Anatoly Karlin

    Very interesting. Very well articulated. I have recently been thinking about the network states for Identitarians, but didn't go that far in my reflection. Basically evolving social anthropology adopting new technologies and adapting to the Technosphere. Competing evolution of network states and post-national states / governments. Makes sense in the globalized future. Although I am pretty sure that TPTB will crush such attempts.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Anatoly Karlin

    Funnily enough I met a Serb nationalist in Belgrade who had come to very similar ideas about creating a “Cloud Serbia”.

    Nations that have ended up historical losers are I think obviously more receptive to these ideas and it’s logical that their nationalists in particular could be icebreakers for this vision.

    Although I am pretty sure that TPTB will crush such attempts.

    A plurality of the world’s major polities (US/EU/China/India) would have to ban decentralized smart contract cryptocurrencies to kill this off, which is possible, but not likely ATM.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @Anatoly Karlin

    IMHO, Serbian and Russian nationalists should simply try to create their own unique national spaces within a Greater EU. I doubt that the West would give too much of a rat's ass about Serbian or Russian nationalism so long as they did not desire to expand at their neighbors' expense any longer. They would still push for a more inclusive Serbian/Russian nationalism, no doubt, but it would be less of an issue for them without ongoing military aggression by Russia.

    If one should also follow the long-term trends in elite human capital, then one should also be a eugenic pro-natalist in any scenario where AI does not fully replace humans since the percentage of elite human capital who are going to be pro-natalist should increase over time due to EHC breeders (Yes, they do exist: Amy Coney Barrett, Mitt Romney, Ben Shapiro, et cetera) making up a larger and larger percentage of the total EHC population over time. It's similar to EHC not having kids in order to save the planet. This might be a huge thing among EHC right now, but it will be less so over time since the percentage of EHC who will have such attitudes will shrink over time since such EHC is being evolutionarily selected against.

    (And frankly, even a successful cure to aging won't completely destroy pro-natalist attitudes since some people simply enjoy being parents. They could take a considerably longer time to do it if humans will have indefinite lifespans, but they should still get around to doing it sooner or later if they will genuinely want to do this.)

    , @Ivashka the fool
    @Anatoly Karlin


    A plurality of the world’s major polities (US/EU/China/India) would have to ban decentralized smart contract cryptocurrencies to kill this off, which is possible, but not likely ATM.
     
    I am unfortunately pretty sure they will do exactly this once the CBDCs kick in. The future belongs to those who would be able to change their digital identifications ans create digital identities at will to access the flow of CBDCs in whatever situations.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antigenic_variation

    Unfortunately, I am too old to apply the implications of this simple insight, so I offer it to smartee and younger guys such as you are Anatoly and to your friends who will attempt at surviving the future digital panopticum and creating these networks in its very economical and informational flows.

    Find a way to become completely unrecognizable online and to create digital identifications at will. It will be useful and people would be ready to pay for it lot.

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @S

  656. AP says:
    @Mikhail
    @AP

    Tatars were never a majority in Crimea from the 1897 census to the present, in addition to not having predated the Rus Slav presence there. To simply say that the Tatars are a mix of different people in Crimea including those predating the Rus Slav presence suggestively omits that the same can be said of Rus Slavs, in addition to noting that the core group associated with the Crimean Tatars came after the Rus Slav presence.

    Replies: @AP

    Tatars were never a majority in Crimea from the 1897 census to the present

    That’s not what I said.

    Tatars outnumbered Russians in 1897 and Russians didn’t become a majority until they expelled the Tatar natives during World War II.

    the Rus Slav presence there

    Is reading maps hard for you?

    Rus presence was limited to 1% of Crimean territory, the tiny corner near the Kerch bridge.

    That’s all that can be claimed based on medieval Rus presence.

    Your argument is as dumb as claiming some Swedish right to all of North America because Delaware was once a Swedish colony.

    the core group associated with the Crimean Tatars came after the Rus Slav presence.

    Crimean Tatars are genetically about 40% Asian. More than Turks in Turkey, but still mostly local.

    And again, “Rus Slav presence” was in 1% of Crimea.

    • LOL: Mikhail
    • Replies: @Mikhail
    @AP


    Your argument is as dumb as claiming some Swedish right to all of North America because Delaware was once a Swedish colony.
     
    An asinine comparison on Delaware's history. Swedes have been long gone from having it as a colony. The overall compassion with Crimea doesn't jive given -

    Tatars were never a majority in Crimea from the 1897 census to the present, in addition to not having predated the Rus Slav presence there. To simply say that the Tatars are a mix of different people in Crimea including those predating the Rus Slav presence suggestively omits that the same can be said of Rus Slavs, in addition to noting that the core group associated with the Crimean Tatars came after the Rus Slav presence.
  657. Could it be said that whole human world history in large on historical timelines was a history of neverending open borders in some sense, buth those open borders were enforced by organized violence, e.g. Alexander enforced open borders onto Persia or Rome enforced its own open borders onto Gaul&Britain at the time.

    From such POV neverending open borders is natural world order, but is it really natural today in specific case of potential African expansion into Europe? In theory if having no any moral qualms united European states are capable to defeat militarily and exterminate population in Africa if they wanted to do so, so by that criteria this specific effect of open borders enabling blacks to come into EU would be not natural thing.

    OTOH, being a dominant force, white Europeans enforced european open borders onto AmerIndians, but at the same time in fact by doing slave trade they also enforced full black West African open borders onto places such as Jamaica or Haiti even if Africans themselves were just as weak militarily against Europeans as they are now;)

    • Replies: @silviosilver
    @sudden death

    None that of that is relevant with respect to the contemporary immigration debate. Not a single bit of it. Today borders exist. Hard borders, impossible to miss borders. Borders that can be monitored and policed and immigration policy enforced. Therefore, the only relevant question is: does immigration - more correctly, mass immigration - serve the existing population of the country being imminvaded. That is the sole question of any relevance. (To which the only honest answer is a resounding "fuck no!")

    Replies: @sudden death

  658. @Mr. XYZ
    @AP


    Historically, the closest European ally of the Ottoman Empire had been France rather than Poland.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franco-Ottoman_alliance

    The Franco-Ottoman Alliance, also known as the Franco-Turkish Alliance, was an alliance established in 1536 between the King of France Francis I and the Sultan of the Ottoman Empire Suleiman I. The strategic and sometimes tactical alliance was one of the longest-lasting and most important foreign alliances of France, and was particularly influential during the Italian Wars. The Franco-Ottoman military alliance reached its peak around 1553 during the reign Henry II of France.[1][2]

    As the first non-ideological alliance in effect between a Christian and Muslim state, the alliance attracted heavy controversy for its time and caused a scandal throughout Christendom.[3][4] Carl Jacob Burckhardt (1947) called it “the sacrilegious union of the lily and the crescent”.[5] It lasted intermittently for more than two and a half centuries,[6] until the Napoleonic campaign in Ottoman Egypt, in 1798–1801.
     
    France seems to have been eager to seek alliances with countries at Europe's periphery: The Ottoman Empire, Russia, Poland, Czechoslovakia, Romania, Yugoslavia.

    Centuries beforehand, Franks (albeit less France itself) played a large role in fighting the Crusades in the Near East.

    Replies: @Sean

    Just after the ‘Beeldenstorm’, in October 1566, Joseph Nasi, a Jewish friend of Orange from Antwerp who had fled from the Inquisition and now worked for the Sultan, arranged for a letter from Süleyman I promising the Netherlands financial and military support. Due to the demise of Süleyman I at the end of the same year, and the attack on the Ottoman Empire by the Ivan the Terrible in 1568, the aid had to wait until 1574.

    In that year, Sultan Selim II sent a special agent to establish communication between the Dutch, the Moriscos of Spain, and the Turkish corsairs in Algiers. In October, the Dutch attacked the Spanish in Leiden, wearing the crescent medallions and flying Ottoman flags on their ships, to terrify the Spanish into thinking the Turks had come all the way North. At exactly the same time, Selim II attacked Tunis, leaving Philip in the panic of a war on two fronts. The collaboration was succesful, as both battles were won. […] Elisabeth of England urged Sultan Murat III to attack Philip’s giant Armada in 1588, but Jerry Brotton has in my view still to supply evidence for his tempting assertion that ‘Ottoman fleet movements in the eastern Mediterranean fatally split Philip II’s Armada’. In any case, the Armada was defeated by the breath of the Almighty: a fierce storm wrecked the entire fleet on the coasts of Northern Europe.

    The Dutch were in 1610 again negotiating with Morocco for a joint attack on Spain by Morocco, the Netherlands, and the Ottoman Sultan. Philip III refers to the contacts between the Moriscos and his ‘enemies in the North’ in the Edict of the Expulsion of the Moors, of 1609.This is an excerpt from the article ‘Let the Muslim be my Master in Outward Things!’ References to Islam in the Promotion of Religious Tolerance in Christian Europe

    In the Thirty Years war Catholic France was in an alliance against the Holy Roman Empire. ” The Swedish Intervention, with the open aid of France, signaled the end of the internal religious war and the beginning of an international political war’. The Emperor’s greatest general, Wallenstein, had many Protestants in his army, including a number of important commanders. Prigozhin is a sort of Wallenstein figure I think.

  659. @Mr. XYZ
    @Anatoly Karlin


    (1) Identitarians/ethno-nationalists who value ethno-cultural homogeneity, at some point, will go “fuck it, this shit is beyond saving” and defect from their societies.
     
    Maybe, but would the types who are particularly eager to do that be of particularly high human capital to begin with? You yourself have previously said that nationalism suffers from a low human capital problem in much of the world other than, of course, in Ukraine. This suggests that the exodus of the more nationalistic elements, especially the duller ones, among the European/white populations of the developed world would not necessarily be viewed as a bad thing by our Woke elites.

    Meanwhile, the importation of less productive Third Worlders – to the extent that the “import the Third World, become the Third World” people are correct – will increase the fiscal burden on those states due to lower productivity, higher welfare demands, less trust, and more tax evasion. They will have to downsize, creating a void that will be filled by… you guessed it network states.
     
    That's why any reasonably sane and self-interested nation-state would primarily seek to import the Third World's cognitive elites and only then worry about their working-classes, other than in truly exceptional circumstances (genuine refugees and/or witness protection in order to protect people from dangerous and vengeful drug lords, for instance).

    BTW, before your recent conversion, did you not view a super-powerful Russia (one that includes both Ukraine and Belarus) as a threat to network states? A super-powerful Russia, had it actually been realized, could have also been quite a formidable threat to network states, no? At least on the scale of a hypothetical surviving Japanese Empire that would have permanently kept both South Korea and Taiwan, since then their populations, at around 200 million, would have been roughly comparable. And Russia strikes me as having rather authoritarian and even totalitarian tendencies even in comparison to the West (at least the US), albeit obviously considerably less so relative to the USSR:

    https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-50902496

    Our Woke press and government might lie a lot about racial questions, but still allow one to find the truth if one searches well/deeply enough, as well as to look at non-Western websites, even those from hostile countries.

    BTW, if elite human capital is always right, then when is elite human capital finally going to make paying child support voluntary and optional?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paper_abortion

    Some intellectuals have already supported this idea, especially those of a liberal and libertarian persuasion. Cathy Young, for instance.

    BTW, what are your thoughts on Philippe Lemoine's argument that the West should have simply thrown Ukraine under the bus and subsequently sponsored an anti-Russian insurgency there 'coz doing so is cheaper than sponsoring a conventional Ukrainian war effort against Russia and that since doing so would piss off Russia to a lesser extent than sponsoring a conventional Ukrainian war effort would?

    https://www.philippelemoine.com/p/the-case-against-western-military

    I think that his argument is naive because in regards to Ukraine, Russia likely has a very high pain tolerance that can quite possibly be reached by a successful Ukrainian conventional war effort but not by a Ukrainian insurgency. In order to get the French from Algeria, 150,000 FLN troops had to lose their lives beforehand, as did between 25,000 and 30,000 French troops and 6,000 French civilians. Without their government quite literally forcing them to fight, I don't see Ukrainians voluntarily being willing to endure those kinds of losses in order to drive Russia out of Ukraine, and anything less might not be enough, in which case Russia would have stayed in Ukraine indefinitely. (Philippe is naive in thinking that Russia would be open to a negotiated settlement in the event of a successful Russian conquest of Ukraine if Russian losses afterwards as a result of a subsequent Ukrainian insurgency simply won't be high enough to teach Russia's pain tolerance limit.) I also don't see Russia being all that much friendlier with the West if the West will let Russia conquer Ukraine but then try sponsoring an anti-Russian insurgency in Ukraine; Russia will still view such a Western move as an extremely hostile anti-Russian act (especially if this Ukrainian insurgency will result in anti-Russian terrorist attacks, including in Russia proper) and as continued aggressive Western meddling in Russia's traditional sphere of influence. And Philippe is naive to think that if any Russia-installed Ukrainian puppet government would have subsequently tried switching sides in order to avoid Yanukovych's fate, that Russia would not have immediately invaded Ukraine again right afterwards--or, alternatively, sponsored an internal coup in Ukraine in order to put someone more pliable and pro-Russian in power there.

    Replies: @Anatoly Karlin

    Maybe, but would the types who are particularly eager to do that be of particularly high human capital to begin with?

    Nationalist EHC will be first to defect from its own societies to recreate an “imagined past” of their culture in network states with “aligned” co-ideologists.

    (I do not claim to be EHC. I am merely an “object”, a “thing”, or a “whatever” that tries to observe and study EHC. However, I could certainly see myself holding an NFT denoting membership of a transhumanist-themed and a Tsarpunk-themed transnational network state; considering cosmism originated in the latter, they would not even be contradictory).

    In fact, this will arguably be a self-reinforcing process, to the extent that these dynamics suck away oxygen and EHC from nationalist/identitarian organizations rooted within and playing by the rules of the traditional nation-state. They are going to become even less prestigious than they are today.

    BTW, before your recent conversion, did you not view a super-powerful Russia (one that includes both Ukraine and Belarus) as a threat to network states?

    One of the bullish factors for network states is that many of the Great Powers are genuinely spiteful towards each other and will forge alliances of convenience with network states, proverbially selling us the rope with which we’ll hang them. “Many such cases” historically.

    Regarding myself personally – I have never hid my contempt towards small nation nationalisms, which are parochial by definition.

    Alternate history scenarios aside, Russia has proven itself a “small” nation, its memes totally Americanized and ruinously so, continuing being a classic Russian nationalist at this point is only slightly less risible than being, say, a Polish or Romanian or even Ukrainian nationalist. I still retain my viewpoint that there is no reason for cultures that do not appear as playable factions in the Civilization games to exist. So for me this “transition” is both logical and at this point very psychologically easy.

    The only nationalisms that still make sense are American, Chinese, and perhaps Indian but they all come with their own thicket of issues. It’s hard to reconcile with American multiculturalism and innately universalist characteristics (there’s a reason why any true American nationalism defaults to White Nationalism which is both universal and transracial), with the Fourteen Principles of Xi Jinping Thought, with Indians basically being this melange of peoples who are as differentiated from each other as Europeans.

    French, German, etc. nationalism don’t make any sense either at this point, despite their once formidable cultures. Visit London or Paris. All very bullish for network states.

    • Replies: @songbird
    @Anatoly Karlin

    Not a perfect example because it is not on the chain, but Twitter Blue couldn't get enough subscribers to institute a reasonable version of free speech, even after Musk's firings. It was still very reliant on advertiser revenue.

    And it wasn't an unknown startup but a branded property.

    IMO, should be somewhat blackpilling for the idea of network states.

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard

    , @Mr. XYZ
    @Anatoly Karlin


    Nationalist EHC will be first to defect from its own societies to recreate an “imagined past” of their culture in network states with “aligned” co-ideologists.
     
    Didn't you previously say that there isn't all that much nationalist EHC to begin with, at least relatively speaking, though?

    https://www.unz.com/akarlin/the-rights-human-capital-problem/

    The EHC that they do have could potentially be attracted by network states, but still, would one prefer to be a big fish in a small pond or a small fish in a big pond? Right now, right-wing EHC such as Rod Dreher can move to places like Hungary (or Poland, I guess) while still remaining within the world-empire known as the EU.

    One of the bullish factors for network states is that many of the Great Powers are genuinely spiteful towards each other and will forge alliances of convenience with network states, proverbially selling us the rope with which we’ll hang them. “Many such cases” historically.
     
    By that logic, though, why aim to destroy nation-states? Simply to weaken them?

    Regarding myself personally – I have never hid my contempt towards small nation nationalisms, which are parochial by definition.

    Alternate history scenarios aside, Russia has proven itself a “small” nation, its memes totally Americanized and ruinously so, continuing being a classic Russian nationalist at this point is only slightly less risible than being, say, a Polish or Romanian or even Ukrainian nationalist.
     
    Ukrainian nationalism actually attracts elite human capital, both at home and abroad, so in this regard it's considerably different from these other nationalisms, even from Russian nationalism. In a world where EHC will be dominant, Ukrainian nationalism will survive and even thrive, most likely. Don't worry about that.

    I also wouldn't call either Poland or Ukraine (or even Finland) joke countries since all of them have managed to hold their own against Russia in a major war (1919-1921, 1939-1940, 2022-present).

    I still retain my viewpoint that there is no reason for cultures that do not appear as playable factions in the Civilization games to exist. So for me this “transition” is both logical and at this point very psychologically easy.
     
    You think and sound like a Social Darwinist. In 1900, there was widespread logic that countries that were insufficiently accomplished don't deserve to have/keep their independence. Maybe we should return to colonialism for the unaccomplished countries, since their independence doesn't mean much anyway?

    I could just as easily have said before the current Ukrainian war that Russia does not deserve to exist as its own civilizational space (and that thus Russia should let the EU have Ukraine unopposed) because Russia (unlike the EU) produces nowhere near enough elite science production or R & D spending to qualify as its own civilizational space, something that would not have been meaningfully changed by Russia conquering and annexing Ukraine and Belarus.

    The only nationalisms that still make sense are American, Chinese, and perhaps Indian but they all come with their own thicket of issues.
     
    Why not European nationalism as well? The EU has more people than the US has, likely a larger smart fraction than India has, and a comparable average IQ to the US (though very possibly a smaller smart fraction).

    If you have previously argued that 200 million people was enough for Russia to become its own civilizational space (which I'm inclined to disagree with), then why is 500+ million people not enough for the EU to likewise become its own civilizational space, at least if it will actually have the desire to do this? The EU can be a separate "junior" civilizational pole in the West besides the more "senior" US/Anglosphere. (Junior and senior in terms of their prestige, not their age.)

    It’s hard to reconcile with American multiculturalism and innately universalist characteristics (there’s a reason why any true American nationalism defaults to White Nationalism which is both universal and transracial),
     
    It's very easy to have a big-tent American nationalism, no? Similar for other Anglosphere nationalisms, especially in Anglosphere settler colonies such as Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, no? One can admire white people for largely building the US but still embrace others who want to be American if they're culturally compatible, can successfully assimilate and contribute, et cetera.

    with the Fourteen Principles of Xi Jinping Thought,
     
    How's that incompatible with Chinese nationalism?

    with Indians basically being this melange of peoples who are as differentiated from each other as Europeans.
     
    Indians have a largely common Hindu identity to unite them, just like Europeans have a largely common historical Christian identity to unite them, not to mention the general achievements and accomplishments of Western civilization.

    French, German, etc. nationalism don’t make any sense either at this point, despite their once formidable cultures. Visit London or Paris. All very bullish for network states.

     

    Those nationalisms, perhaps not, but European nationalism appears to be quite popular and successful, no?

    BTW, if small state nationalism should be rejected, then this should also apply to Israeli Jewish nationalism, right? Israel does not have anywhere near large enough economies of scale to become a global power, after all.

    Replies: @Anatoly Karlin, @QCIC

    , @Ivashka the fool
    @Anatoly Karlin


    All very bullish for network states.

     

    Just call these network societies, forget about the state part.
    , @Mr. XYZ
    @Anatoly Karlin

    Also, you have previously said that Russia cannot be truly sovereign with only 150 million people, right? Then how exactly are network states supposed to be truly sovereign with population sizes that are astronomically smaller than Russia's?

    You really think that a 1 million or 5 million or 10 million person-strong network state is actually capable of being truly sovereign? If so, how come it can be and a Russia with a whopping 150 million people cannot be?

    (I have previously mentioned how, outside of nation-states, only religious organizations (churches, et cetera) and political parties are able to amass membership sizes that are able to compete with those of nation-states, at least so far. And a network state run by either religious people or members of a single political party might not always have the best outcome, if one goes by the past experience of nation-states with such a character.)

    Replies: @Anatoly Karlin

  660. @sudden death
    Could it be said that whole human world history in large on historical timelines was a history of neverending open borders in some sense, buth those open borders were enforced by organized violence, e.g. Alexander enforced open borders onto Persia or Rome enforced its own open borders onto Gaul&Britain at the time.

    From such POV neverending open borders is natural world order, but is it really natural today in specific case of potential African expansion into Europe? In theory if having no any moral qualms united European states are capable to defeat militarily and exterminate population in Africa if they wanted to do so, so by that criteria this specific effect of open borders enabling blacks to come into EU would be not natural thing.

    OTOH, being a dominant force, white Europeans enforced european open borders onto AmerIndians, but at the same time in fact by doing slave trade they also enforced full black West African open borders onto places such as Jamaica or Haiti even if Africans themselves were just as weak militarily against Europeans as they are now;)

    Replies: @silviosilver

    None that of that is relevant with respect to the contemporary immigration debate. Not a single bit of it. Today borders exist. Hard borders, impossible to miss borders. Borders that can be monitored and policed and immigration policy enforced. Therefore, the only relevant question is: does immigration – more correctly, mass immigration – serve the existing population of the country being imminvaded. That is the sole question of any relevance. (To which the only honest answer is a resounding “fuck no!”)

    • Replies: @sudden death
    @silviosilver


    does immigration – more correctly, mass immigration – serve the existing population of the country being imminvaded
     
    Most probably today equivalents of George Washinton slave owner type super wealthy white people really do think so now as they thought then too - mass brown/black immigration really serves them and they have the means to immunise themselves from negative effects as current Brazil/Mexico wealthy elite has the means to immunise themselves from everyday violence in the streets while remaing rich&safe with their own bodyguards and high walls. Even if there is no lawful racism and white supremacy differently from Washington era in North America.

    Replies: @S, @silviosilver

  661. @silviosilver
    @sudden death

    None that of that is relevant with respect to the contemporary immigration debate. Not a single bit of it. Today borders exist. Hard borders, impossible to miss borders. Borders that can be monitored and policed and immigration policy enforced. Therefore, the only relevant question is: does immigration - more correctly, mass immigration - serve the existing population of the country being imminvaded. That is the sole question of any relevance. (To which the only honest answer is a resounding "fuck no!")

    Replies: @sudden death

    does immigration – more correctly, mass immigration – serve the existing population of the country being imminvaded

    Most probably today equivalents of George Washinton slave owner type super wealthy white people really do think so now as they thought then too – mass brown/black immigration really serves them and they have the means to immunise themselves from negative effects as current Brazil/Mexico wealthy elite has the means to immunise themselves from everyday violence in the streets while remaing rich&safe with their own bodyguards and high walls. Even if there is no lawful racism and white supremacy differently from Washington era in North America.

    • Agree: Ivashka the fool
    • Replies: @S
    @sudden death


    Most probably today equivalents of George Washinton slave owner type super wealthy white people really do think so now as they thought then too – mass brown/black immigration really serves them and they have the means to immunise themselves from negative effects as current Brazil/Mexico wealthy elite has the means to immunise themselves from everyday violence in the streets while remaing rich&safe with their own bodyguards and high walls.
     
    That's a good way of looking at it.

    Due to the reality in the Anglosphere of chattel slavery and it's trade having been monetized (as opposed to having been 'abolished') with the early 19th century introduction of wage slavery (ie specifically the so called 'cheap labor'/'mass immigration' system) we still have much the same horrid social template (though arguably much worse now) which existed in 1750 British North America in the present day United States.

    That template consisted of powerful elements amongst the elites and their hangers on not wishing to go to the time, trouble, sacrifice, and most notably, expense, to employ their own. To escape that social responsibility they had grown accustomed, by diktat, to importing alien chattel slave labor from Africa.

    This caused all sorts of social ills in society, ie depressed wages amongst the free non-slave population, unnecessary racial division with the (also by diktat) introduction of the 'freed' slaves into the larger society, the corruption in all sorts of ways of the slaving elites and their hangers on themselves.

    When in accordance to the tenet of Capitalism to maximize profits chattel slavery and it's trade was monetized in the early 19th century with the introduction of wage slavery (ie so called 'cheap labor'/'mass immigration') under cover of a faux 'abolition', a veritable revolution in the slavery industry took place, ie every last negative that slave dealer, slave owner, and slave trade financier, had formally had to deal with had now been outsourced (ie dumped upon) the general non-exploiting public, the vast majority, to now deal with, while the former still profited handsomely (now without the hassles) of not having to pay their own the prevailing real time local rates for their labor.

    If I was one of these historic amoral/immoral slavers and their hangers on I would see this as one of the greatest of triumphs over my fellow man, and mankind as a whole, which had ever occurred in the history of the world. [The US Civil War, a war fought in reality by both 'sides' for slavery -the North's wage slavery vs the South's chattel slave system-, with it's seven hundred thousand dead representing that many new empty slots to be potentially replaced by imported wage slaves (ie so called 'cheap labor') could be seen by these historic slaving elites as an added bonus.]
    , @silviosilver
    @sudden death


    Most probably today equivalents of George Washinton slave owner type super wealthy white people really do think so now as they thought then too
     
    Serves them, but doesn't serve the common good.
  662. @LatW
    @Emil Nikola Richard


    Apparently Belarus is number one in per capita potato consumption.
     
    Nothing wrong with that, I was just trying to make a joke about how Luka, this old fox, so often talks as if he is some simple country dude (which in combination with his hick-like accent comes off somewhat believable - and totally chad-like).

    Yea, nothing special here, just a few Wagnerites living in that Soviet era high rise next door. :) These fine fellows have been on a couple of tours in Syria and in Donbass, other than that they are totally normal. :)


    If it has nothing better to do than post here is that really a bad development?
     
    And you gotta admit that it is pretty creative to pronounce oneself as "post-masculine" while a draft is taking place. A fantastic way out. "I'm post-masculine, do not count me in" - priceless. Might be even more effective than throwing Molotov cocktails at army recruitment centers. From what I've heard, back in the Soviet times, one had to go to great lengths to "prove" that one is "crazy" or mentally unstable, in order to avoid military service. But these days claiming you're "post-masculine" may not be considered crazy or a mental condition. So may or may not work.

    And, by the way, how is "elite human capital" defined? Cognitive elites is understandable, but EHC sounds like it could be something much, much broader. What about beautiful but average IQ people? What about super smart and quirky people who are not conscientious enough to follow all social norms but are otherwise fantastic people? What about crazy artists? What about mediocre and spoiled offspring of cognitive elites (even eugenics and perfect parenting doesn't guarantee an ideal outcome)? Etc, etc. How is this EHC really defined?

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Coconuts, @Emil Nikola Richard

    And, by the way, how is “elite human capital” defined?

    In June 2023 in my view the most salient feature is they have outsourced their body’s immune system to World Economic Forum goons.

    Where do you think the omicron came from?

    • LOL: Ivashka the fool
  663. A123 says: • Website

    The attempt to deny Americans the only MAGA candidate in the GOP primary is failing. (1)

    CBS Report, Mysterious DoD Iran Attack Memo Does Not Exist and Is Not Part of Jack Smith Case Against Trump

    After a full media cycle of apoplexy and pearl-clutching, which included Andrew Weissmann appearing on MSNBC to declare “It’s the end of Trump,” CBS is now reporting there is no Defense Department memo about attacking Iran – the foundation of the media claims surrounding the leaked audio tapes from Special Counsel Jack Smith.

    Even Fake Stream Media outlets realize that the false narrative against MAGA Trump is a loser. CBS is distancing their staff, and others may follow.

    Is this the end for Not-The-President Biden? The attempt to generate a Hunter deal that would block further investigation has fallen apart. Not to mention the inexplicable $10MM that has been tracked back to The Big Guy himself.

    PEACE 😇
    __________

    (1) https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2023/06/27/cbs-report-mysterious-dod-iran-attack-memo-does-not-exist-and-is-not-part-of-jack-smith-case-against-trump/

     

  664. @Mikhail
    @Mr. Hack


    I don’t know? Why not ask Wokechoke, our resident expert on Ukrainian and Russian Jewish politicians?
     
    Jewish American geopolitico Victoria Nuland might be better, recalling her support for Yats:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JoW75J5bnnE

    Prefer Sheila Broflovski to Nuland:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pq80MKS7prY

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

    I don’t understand your sudden interest in Yatsenyuk, be it him being viewed through a prism of Wokechoke or Nuland? I reviewed his bio within Wikipedia and see that he never really was for closer cooperation with Russia, but a staunch supporter of an independent Ukraine within a European vector. So he hates “Nazis”, so do most Ukrainians, his latest manifestation is somewhat perplexing, perhaps that’s why you find him so interesting?

    • Replies: @Mikhail
    @Mr. Hack


    I don’t understand your sudden interest in Yatsenyuk, be it him being viewed through a prism of Wokechoke or Nuland? I reviewed his bio within Wikipedia and see that he never really was for closer cooperation with Russia, but a staunch supporter of an independent Ukraine within a European vector. So he hates “Nazis”, so do most Ukrainians, his latest manifestation is somewhat perplexing, perhaps that’s why you find him so interesting?

     

    Was simply asking if that presented video (from my prior comments) was a fake? Sudden Death gave his belief on why it is. If you go back further, I heard that Yats was once favorable to some loose union arrangement with Russia. I'd have to check on that.
  665. AP says:
    @Wokechoke
    @AP

    When was Poland continuously at war with Turkey?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Russo-Turkish_wars

    While the Russians were battling it out with the Turks from Ivan Grozny to Peter the Great era through Elizabeth to Catherine and finally Alexander and Nicholas where were these Poles again?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish–Ottoman_War_(1672–1676)

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish–Ottoman_War_(1683–1699)

    There’s around 30 years of kinetic contact. That’s about it.

    Compared to this…

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Russo-Turkish_wars

    400 years of fighting the Turks around the Black Sea and the Danube and Volga Rivers.


    What were the Poles doing as the Russians finally ejected the Turk from the northern rim of the Black Sea? Oh that’s right, preparing an all out assault on Moscow in cahoots with Napoleon.

    Replies: @AP

    While the Russians were battling it out with the Turks from Ivan Grozny to Peter the Great era through Elizabeth to Catherine and finally Alexander and Nicholas where were these Poles again?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish–Ottoman_War_(1672–1676)

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish–Ottoman_War_(1683–1699)

    There’s around 30 years of kinetic contact. That’s about it.

    You lie by omission. Full list is here:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish%E2%80%93Ottoman_Wars

    At the Battle of Khotyn in 1621, a Polish-Ukrainian force defeated a massive Ottoman-Tatar army that was about the same size as the one that would be defeated at Vienna a few generations later:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Khotyn_(1621)

    Compared to this…

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Russo-Turkish_wars

    400 years of fighting the Turks around the Black Sea and the Danube and Volga Rivers.

    The Polish victories over the Ottomsns were far more consequential for European history and for keeping the Turks out of Europe then were the Russian battles with them over some peripheral areas, or later victories when the Ottomans were a fading power and no longer much of a threat. When the Turks were a superpower, at their peak, the Poles fought and defeated them. Russia mostly just picked over the leftovers afterward.

    What were the Poles doing as the Russians finally ejected the Turk from the northern rim of the Black Sea? Oh that’s right, preparing an all out assault on Moscow in cahoots with Napoleon.

    Russia wanted an alliance with the Turks and had one for a few years, before the Turks rejected the Russians.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russo-Ottoman_alliance

    “The Russo-Ottoman alliance was a defensive alliance between the Russian Empire and the Ottoman Empire, directed against France between 1799 and 1806, during the Napoleonic Wars.”

    • Replies: @Mikhail
    @AP

    A Cossack-Polish alliance against the Turks. That instance was the first scene in the Hollywood version of Taras Bulba. In that scene, after the Turks were defeated the Cossacks and Poles said to each other, now we can be normal and start fighting again between us.

    , @Mr. XYZ
    @AP

    Ironically, it would have probably been better had the Russo-Ottoman alliance survived and had the Ottomans not been expelled from the Caucasus and the Balkans. This would have prevented the ethnic cleansing and/or genocide of Balkan and Caucasian Muslims:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circassian_genocide

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhacir

    And would have also prevented the Ottoman Empire from feeling paranoid about its own security, which in turn would have very likely prevented the Armenian Genocide since the Ottoman Empire would not have had any reason to view Armenians (an ancient Christian people) as potential pro-Russian fifth columnists in such a scenario.

    Those Balkanoids who disliked Ottoman rule could have simply moved to Russia. Anatoly Karlin argues that it's irrational for people to care about arbitrary territories (such as whether the West becomes a dump), which would apply just as much in this case (and, for that matter, in a scenario where Ukraine ethnically cleanses Crimea and/or the Donbass without ever actually resorting to mass murder). Balkanoids would have had to accept that their traditional homelands would have permanently remained under Muslim rule but would have had the option of living in Russia, an Orthodox Christian country. Interestingly enough, nowadays Turkey is a pretty pleasant place to live in, especially for a Muslim country. Comparable to Bulgaria, Serbia, and Macedonia, in fact.

  666. @AP
    @songbird


    It may be that AP is a crypto-Turk who boosts Austria-Hungary and the Intermarium, as a cloak and disguise.
     
    Well, according to pan-Turkic nationalists, all Ukrainians are crypto-Turks. I had a friend in university about 30 years ago, from one of the ex-Soviet Turkic republics who was really into this idea, we had such a drunken geopolitical discussion. He was proclaiming that we are all Turks really, and that the Russians are our mutual enemies. He was a nephew of his country's president, and is now a high ranking government official, I am glad that his country supports Ukraine, such fantasies among Turks may be useful :-)

    And according to early modern Polish Sarmatists, all Polish nobles were crypto-Turks (they believed that they were descended from Sarmatians, and back then it was falsely believed that Sarmatians were Turkic people - we now know that Sarmatians were Iranic rather than Turkic). And this was at the time when Poles were always at war with the Turks. They thought of the conflict as religious more than ethnic.

    But in reality, I am less of a crypto-Turk than "wokechoke" is a crypto-Jew.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @Ivashka the fool, @songbird

    IMO, Roxelana alone would make Ukraine a shoe-in for observer status in the OTS. I understand she is a very popular figure in Turkish soaps.

    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @songbird

    Not just soaps, but really good popular Turkish music too:

    https://open.spotify.com/album/2zuQMRFkZLLcgCGTH5vt7x?si=bvHvBqXhQaqrO_RccuYLZw

    She inspires the writing of Ukrainian novels and historical TV dramas too.

    Replies: @songbird

  667. @Anatoly Karlin
    @Mr. XYZ


    Maybe, but would the types who are particularly eager to do that be of particularly high human capital to begin with?
     
    Nationalist EHC will be first to defect from its own societies to recreate an "imagined past" of their culture in network states with "aligned" co-ideologists.

    https://twitter.com/powerfultakes/status/1617559733266776064

    (I do not claim to be EHC. I am merely an "object", a "thing", or a "whatever" that tries to observe and study EHC. However, I could certainly see myself holding an NFT denoting membership of a transhumanist-themed and a Tsarpunk-themed transnational network state; considering cosmism originated in the latter, they would not even be contradictory).

    In fact, this will arguably be a self-reinforcing process, to the extent that these dynamics suck away oxygen and EHC from nationalist/identitarian organizations rooted within and playing by the rules of the traditional nation-state. They are going to become even less prestigious than they are today.

    BTW, before your recent conversion, did you not view a super-powerful Russia (one that includes both Ukraine and Belarus) as a threat to network states?
     
    One of the bullish factors for network states is that many of the Great Powers are genuinely spiteful towards each other and will forge alliances of convenience with network states, proverbially selling us the rope with which we'll hang them. "Many such cases" historically.

    Regarding myself personally - I have never hid my contempt towards small nation nationalisms, which are parochial by definition.

    Alternate history scenarios aside, Russia has proven itself a "small" nation, its memes totally Americanized and ruinously so, continuing being a classic Russian nationalist at this point is only slightly less risible than being, say, a Polish or Romanian or even Ukrainian nationalist. I still retain my viewpoint that there is no reason for cultures that do not appear as playable factions in the Civilization games to exist. So for me this "transition" is both logical and at this point very psychologically easy.

    The only nationalisms that still make sense are American, Chinese, and perhaps Indian but they all come with their own thicket of issues. It's hard to reconcile with American multiculturalism and innately universalist characteristics (there's a reason why any true American nationalism defaults to White Nationalism which is both universal and transracial), with the Fourteen Principles of Xi Jinping Thought, with Indians basically being this melange of peoples who are as differentiated from each other as Europeans.

    French, German, etc. nationalism don't make any sense either at this point, despite their once formidable cultures. Visit London or Paris. All very bullish for network states.

    Replies: @songbird, @Mr. XYZ, @Ivashka the fool, @Mr. XYZ

    Not a perfect example because it is not on the chain, but Twitter Blue couldn’t get enough subscribers to institute a reasonable version of free speech, even after Musk’s firings. It was still very reliant on advertiser revenue.

    And it wasn’t an unknown startup but a branded property.

    IMO, should be somewhat blackpilling for the idea of network states.

    • Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
    @songbird

    Urbit!

    ha ha ha ha sometimes I crack myself up

    Replies: @songbird

  668. Been reading this thing on bourses like it was a gripping novel to see all the various permutations and layers of clannishness when compared to pozzed Ireland today. Already up to page 120, after finding it a few days ago. And there is zero commentary.

    [MORE]

    Pretty clear that paternal relatives were favored. Have even seen it specified as a ratio 6:4 in a will, which is probably being generous.

    Other examples of clannishness, I’ve seen recently:
    – certain spellings of names specified as not being included
    -people in Connaught, whose families had been transplanted from Ulster (100+ years after fact)
    -12th century branching of family preferred over earlier branchings.

    And it is obvious that there was a certain utility in it. Sending your kids to get an education overseas was treated as a serious crime, with total confiscation of property. There were many spies, and students used fake names.

  669. @songbird
    @Anatoly Karlin

    Not a perfect example because it is not on the chain, but Twitter Blue couldn't get enough subscribers to institute a reasonable version of free speech, even after Musk's firings. It was still very reliant on advertiser revenue.

    And it wasn't an unknown startup but a branded property.

    IMO, should be somewhat blackpilling for the idea of network states.

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard

    Urbit!

    ha ha ha ha sometimes I crack myself up

    • Replies: @songbird
    @Emil Nikola Richard

    One if the biggest obstacles to these kind of libertarian-technical solutions to modern problems is that even small energy barriers are big filters, preventing economies of scale.

    How many people switched from YouTube to odyssee, to follow their favorite political commentators? How much of netflix's economic model is built on people too lazy to cancel their membership?

  670. @Mikhail
    @AP

    The pre-Tatar invasion inhabitants weren't Tatars. The Rus Slav presence in Crimea predates that of the slave trading Crimean Tatars. You don't mention the Scythians. The Crimean Tatars haven't been a majority for quite some time. In more recent instances, they had a plurality. In even more recent instances they're the clear minority. Crimea has a rock solid well over 2/3 favoring reunification with Russia.

    Replies: @Beckow

    He knows…AP’s only way of arguing is to selectively pick a few factoids and to pretend that he doesn’t see the context or the world. When he is called on it, he becomes hysterical. I would not bother with him…

    The reality is that Crimea has a massive native Russian majority that wants to live in Russia. That means that either 2 million Russians would be expelled and some murdered (like in Odessa) or they would be militarily occupied and their identity suppressed. Both those methods are criminal and simply can’t be done in normal Europe. But we know that EU has lost any sense of proportion and would look the other way.

    That means that Russia has a rather simple choice: watch its people murdered, expelled and deprived of any rights, or go all the way. The same applies to Donbas and a few other Russian areas of Ukraine. The West is forcing this choice. One wonders why? Why wasn’t a reasonable compromise like the Minsk deal adopted? Unfortunately the answer is that the West has decided some time ago to destroy or to fatally weaken Russia. The problem is that it can’t work and we could all perish while they attempt it. Ukies are just collateral damage, if they don’t see it, they are failing the basic Darwin test of evolution…

  671. The two-day poll that was concluded on Tuesday charted a sharp rise in backing for arming Ukraine, with 65% of the respondents approving of the shipments compared with 46% in a May poll.

    Eighty-one percent of Democrats, 56% of Republicans and 57% of independents favor supplying U.S. weapons to Ukraine, according to the latest poll.

    The survey was conducted just days after Yevgeny Prigozhin, the head of the private Wagner mercenary company, launched and then called off a mutiny over what he charged was the Russian defense ministry’s mishandling of the war in Ukraine.

    The findings appeared to provide firmer backing for U.S. President Joe Biden’s policy of doing “whatever it takes” to assist Ukraine in recapturing territory that Russia seized in an initial assault in 2014 and its full-scale invasion 16 months ago.

    “This definitely reinforces Biden’s decision to be all-in on this,” said William Taylor, a former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine now with the U.S. Institute of Peace.

    “The Republican leadership of the House and Senate will also take heart from this,” Taylor said. Some right-wing Republican lawmakers have opposed continuing U.S. military support for Ukraine.

    https://www.reuters.com/world/most-americans-support-us-arming-ukraine-reutersipsos-2023-06-28/

    • Replies: @A123
    @sudden death

    American support for funding Ukraine heads below 50%: (1)


    the share of Americans who say the U.S. is providing too much aid to Ukraine has steadily increased since the start of the war, largely driven by a shift among Republicans.

     
    https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/sr_2023.06.15_Ukraine-aid_1.png


     

    While this is still a plurality, it is clearly a trend headed towards ending the fighting.

    Another key factor to consider is intensity of support.


    Roughly a third of Americans (32%) say Russia’s invasion of Ukraine is a major threat to U.S. interests.

     
    https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/sr_2023.06.15_Ukraine-aid_2.png

     

    Numbers are headed downwards towards the January 2022 figures that predate the Russian SMO. The "inch deep" effect is in play. When given a choice to appear virtuous they take the top line answer that emphasizes that superficial platitude.

    More detailed questions show that there is a consistent negative slide in the popularity for funding Kiev aggression. The shrinking count for "major threat" means that translating superficiality into votes is becoming difficult to impossible. Especially in MAGA constituencies.

    If the DNC wants more money for Kiev offensive operations, they will have to make substantial concessions to the GOP House. Will Not-The-President Biden's administration prioritize funding Zelensky over domestic concerns? This would be highly problematic heading into the Presidential election cycle. However, who knows what blackmail material is out there pressuring the Veggie-in-Chief and his criminal offspring.

    PEACE 😇
    __________

    (1) https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/06/15/more-than-four-in-ten-republicans-now-say-the-us-is-providing-too-much-aid-to-ukraine/sr_2023-06-15_ukraine-aid_1/

    Replies: @keypusher

  672. @songbird
    @AP

    IMO, Roxelana alone would make Ukraine a shoe-in for observer status in the OTS. I understand she is a very popular figure in Turkish soaps.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

    Not just soaps, but really good popular Turkish music too:

    She inspires the writing of Ukrainian novels and historical TV dramas too.

    • Replies: @songbird
    @Mr. Hack

    Robert E. Howard's Red Sonja character was supposed to be sister to Roxelana. They didn't get along.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

  673. @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms
    @Dmitry


    Because you want to talk about China and are not interested about learning about Russia.
     
    I’m not the one shitting on Russian culture, you are. I’m pointing out the obvious commonalities in Russian and Chinese history. Deng Xiaoping didn't come up with "One Country, Two Systems", the source of ethnonym you have for us, Khitans did, with a dual system of nomadic organization north of Great Wall, scholar-official bureacracy south of it, made a more "scalable" solution inherited by PRC.

    Similar to Mongol conquest of Russia that has made it into a more scalable multi-ethnic empire. Thus some historians call Batu first tsar of Russia--

    Батый — первый царь России
    https://diletant.media/articles/45302248/

    Russian Tsar Batu | Penzev Konstantin Alexandrovich

    According to the author, there was an unspoken agreement between Khan Baty, Russian princes and the Russian Orthodox Church on mutually beneficial cooperation in organizing the Horde
     
    https://libking.ru/books/sci-/sci-history/101578-konstantin-penzev-russkiy-tsar-batyy.html?__cf_chl_jschl_tk__=IHLVowDhxi3yq_iQ1cF3iSsXaDTSzT8vBZ_dVvslGgY-1636376717-0-gaNycGzNCOU

    “Wagner” was internal conflict of elites, with a popular group, while the army is in Ukraine. It’s not related to the flat terrain in Russia. The military doesn’t shoot against Wagner.
     
    Are you this dense? Can Blackwater PMC in Iraq/Afghanistan simply go renegade and turn its army on the US mainland, and drive tanks over vast oceans?

    Russia is less more expansionary than USA, Brazil.
     
    When was Brazil ever been depicted in such a way?
    https://i.postimg.cc/zG02qL8n/Blancs-et-Jaunes-Le-Petit-Parisien-1904.jpg

    China is an example of culture manufacturer, old center, while Russia is culture importer
     
    Buddhism was imported from India. PRC was founded by a Swede-Jew-Kalmyk and a Georgian. Modern Chinese couldn’t have a conversation without Japanese-made Chinese words, introduced through Dutch learning. Half of Chinese dynasties were ruled by Tatars.

    China in its history have cucked to dozens of barbarian invasions and Prigozhin-like usurpers, its civilisation survived because enough men didn’t wallowing in self-abasement, like you are doing now, not a good look.

    Replies: @Dmitry

    shitting on Russian culture, you are. I’m pointing out the obvious commonalities in Russian and Chinese

    What is “shitting on Russian culture”, I wonder about the lack of education of the person who cannot read about history without viewing it in terms of using a toilet, in this example probably some traditional Chinese toilet that doesn’t connect to a water system.

    Why would writing about Russian history trigger a monomaniacal user to start writing a mix of insults and comments about China?

    This is rhetorical. I’m not wondering. Instead of reading interesting text written by someone who knows more about a topic than you, the monomaniacal user needs to intrude content about a country which has no similarity. It’s expected of someone who has to add their country as the first word of their username. Not interested about others’ countries, only interested about China.

    Are you this dense? Can Blackwater PMC in Iraq/Afghanistan simply go renegade and turn its army on the US mainland, and drive tanks over vast oceans?

    “Wagner” was internal rebellion inside southern Russia. They move inside the country because there is little internal resistance. The official army doesn’t shoot, allows them through the checkpoint. It’s not related to flat terrain.

    As for discussion about Iraq or Afghanistan going to US mainland. Those are separate countries, with a lot of distance. I’m sure if Afghanistan was an army inside America, they could drive to New York. However, the army and police would respond. Inside Russia, nobody shoots at “Wagner” except some helicopters, as they are “patriots” in Russia with support of the government marketing in the last months and “Wagner” are very popular with the local people.

    By the way, Wagner was a German composer of the 19th century. He was very popular in Russia in the 19th century and partly creates the idea of developing what they called the national music in late Russian empire time, which is also concept imported into 19th century Russia from the German romanticism including Wagner’s writings.

    Buddhism was imported from India. PRC was founded by a Swede-Jew-Kalmyk and a Georgian. Modern Chinese couldn’t have a conversation without Japanese-made Chinese words, introduced through Dutch learning. Half of Chinese dynasties were ruled by Tatars.

    China in its history have cucked to dozens of barbarian invasions

    China is a very interesting country, which is sad we don’t learn about its history.

    Your post is at least reminder we should learn something about China. It’s also reminder I should be reading texts written by educated people i.e. not the kind of people who view history in terms of alternative right American sexual memes (“cucked to dozens of barbarian”).

  674. Local UA breakthrough might be developing in Zaporozhe front:

  675. A123 says: • Website
    @sudden death

    The two-day poll that was concluded on Tuesday charted a sharp rise in backing for arming Ukraine, with 65% of the respondents approving of the shipments compared with 46% in a May poll.

    Eighty-one percent of Democrats, 56% of Republicans and 57% of independents favor supplying U.S. weapons to Ukraine, according to the latest poll.

    The survey was conducted just days after Yevgeny Prigozhin, the head of the private Wagner mercenary company, launched and then called off a mutiny over what he charged was the Russian defense ministry's mishandling of the war in Ukraine.

    The findings appeared to provide firmer backing for U.S. President Joe Biden's policy of doing "whatever it takes" to assist Ukraine in recapturing territory that Russia seized in an initial assault in 2014 and its full-scale invasion 16 months ago.

    "This definitely reinforces Biden's decision to be all-in on this," said William Taylor, a former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine now with the U.S. Institute of Peace.

    "The Republican leadership of the House and Senate will also take heart from this," Taylor said. Some right-wing Republican lawmakers have opposed continuing U.S. military support for Ukraine.
     
    https://www.reuters.com/world/most-americans-support-us-arming-ukraine-reutersipsos-2023-06-28/

    Replies: @A123

    American support for funding Ukraine heads below 50%: (1)

    the share of Americans who say the U.S. is providing too much aid to Ukraine has steadily increased since the start of the war, largely driven by a shift among Republicans.

     

    While this is still a plurality, it is clearly a trend headed towards ending the fighting.

    Another key factor to consider is intensity of support.

    Roughly a third of Americans (32%) say Russia’s invasion of Ukraine is a major threat to U.S. interests.

     

    Numbers are headed downwards towards the January 2022 figures that predate the Russian SMO. The “inch deep” effect is in play. When given a choice to appear virtuous they take the top line answer that emphasizes that superficial platitude.

    More detailed questions show that there is a consistent negative slide in the popularity for funding Kiev aggression. The shrinking count for “major threat” means that translating superficiality into votes is becoming difficult to impossible. Especially in MAGA constituencies.

    If the DNC wants more money for Kiev offensive operations, they will have to make substantial concessions to the GOP House. Will Not-The-President Biden’s administration prioritize funding Zelensky over domestic concerns? This would be highly problematic heading into the Presidential election cycle. However, who knows what blackmail material is out there pressuring the Veggie-in-Chief and his criminal offspring.

    PEACE 😇
    __________

    (1) https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/06/15/more-than-four-in-ten-republicans-now-say-the-us-is-providing-too-much-aid-to-ukraine/sr_2023-06-15_ukraine-aid_1/

    • Replies: @keypusher
    @A123

    According to a recent Reuters/Ipsos polls, 81% of Democrats, 56% of Republicans and 57% of independents favor supplying U.S. weapons to Ukraine.

    It's a different poll, so maybe they're just phrasing the questions differently, but overall support for sending US weapons (65%) was much higher than it was when they asked the question in May (46%).

    https://www.reuters.com/world/most-americans-support-us-arming-ukraine-reutersipsos-2023-06-28/

    So Prigozhin's mutiny or whatever it was may have had an effect.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

  676. @Coconuts
    @LatW


    And, by the way, how is “elite human capital” defined?
     
    I thought it meant the ruling elite.

    If elite theory is correct they will have various people producing the political formula which explains their power. Elite circulation is a constant thing though, so the composition of the elite will change over time. Also the political formulas will change.

    Replies: @LatW

    I thought it meant the ruling elite.

    EHC will often be the elite, but is the elite always EHC? I was wondering if these network states will only contain EHC, and then how is that defined (and even more importantly, maintained).

    Elite circulation is a constant thing though, so the composition of the elite will change over time.

    It’s always been the case, especially now, but there have always been academic networks and executives often operate internationally anyway.

    So in a way, one can say that these large globalized companies are already like networks, maybe they are not states, but they do often have their own culture, own goals (not just business goals, but also social impact related which they themselves decide on). It’s only a matter where this becomes “political” and also how the ownership part is handled (taxes, properties).

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @LatW


    It’s only a matter where this becomes “political” and also how the ownership part is handled (taxes, properties).
     
    https://www.undp.org/sgtechcentre/smart-cities-1

    https://www.un.org/en/un-chronicle/blockchain-and-sustainable-growth

    https://www.un.org/development/desa/dpad/publication/world-economic-situation-and-prospects-august-2022-briefing-no-163/

    The answer is wherever, taken at the source.

    Replies: @LatW

  677. @QCIC
    @Mr. XYZ

    What do married Russian women think about these brothels and their signs?

    Do the prostitutes in Russia have legal protections as in some European countries or is this just standard human bondage and trafficking with modern advertising?

    In the USA it is not uncommon to see large billboards for "exotic dancing" places (strip clubs). I think these places inevitably connect with prostitution in addition to the dancing.

    Replies: @Dmitry

    In the reality of practical life, Russia is more socially/sexually liberal than many Western countries, so people are not going to protest against the brothels, accept this is a normal part of life, perhaps not liking the billboards however because of the negative image to the city. Even I saw, local media in the recent years in Russia is promoting prostitution as a good job for women, with high salary.

    But the rules of speech are a bit different. For example, in the Soviet culture they had kind of Victorian ideas about what they allow in mass culture. Even in the 19th century Russian empire like this, with the concept to read sexual literature only in French language, while Russian literature would have rules so it avoids sex. When old people complain in Russia, it’s usually related to what is allowed in media, instead of what is allowed in real life.

    If you read the books of a historian who is famous in Russia (Boris Mironov), in traditional Russian village even in 19th century they couldn’t impose Christian rules about sexuality, against more liberal traditional views. According to Mironov, this is one of the many reasons why the Church has to invest a large part of its project into the villages in the 19th century, to try to educate the villagers, not attaining success.

    As for why the 21st century Russian government has been so successful to market to rightwing Americans who logically choose a socially conservative country, not socially liberal country? AP in the forum is an example of this. I think it’s an interesting dialectic of the Cold War. One of the changes in the school system in Russia in the last decade, they write in the lesson guide the teachers need to promote “family values”, which is terms from the 1970s Republican Party.

    It’s the normal practice in Russia, where the explicit culture is imported, here they import in the fashions in America and Fox News, while real underlying Russian culture doesn’t change under the surface for centuries.

    It’s also true, rightwing voters seem to like more “sexually liberated” politicians, with less “family values”. The rightwing voters like Trump, Berlusconi, Johnson, also Putin and a lot of the officials.

    • Replies: @Another Polish Perspective
    @Dmitry


    If you read the books of a historian who is famous in Russia (Boris Mironov), in traditional Russian village even in 19th century they couldn’t impose Christian rules about sexuality, against more liberal traditional views.
     
    Yeah, when I researched cousin marriages around the world, I met this phenomenon, a kind of polygamy actually... fathers living with sons' wives. No wonder it could later produce some unintentional cousin marriages.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snokhachestvo

    As for the Orthodox Church, I read once a novel (Russian but in German translation) which was taking place in a village belonging to a monastery, and almost every monk had his lover in this village... And everyone around took it for granted, as almost natural...

    I suppose such attitudes could be bred in Russia due to isolation of such communities, and in this sense, insularity seems to free the more animalistic side of human.

    Replies: @Dmitry

    , @John Johnson
    @Dmitry

    In the reality of practical life, Russia is more socially/sexually liberal than many Western countries, so people are not going to protest against the brothels, accept this is a normal part of life, perhaps not liking the billboards however because of the negative image to the city. Even I saw, local media in the recent years in Russia is promoting prostitution as a good job for women, with high salary.

    Yes and this is partly why they have the world's highest abortion rate and Europe's highest HIV rate.

    The have an urban Slavic atheistic core that views abortion as perfectly acceptable birth control.

    Get drunk, get an abortion and then get back to the clubs.

    The Communists created an atheistic hole within the cities that will never be repaired. They don't have gay parades but view abortion as part of being single.

    The bitter dwarf king could end abortion by decree but instead decided to attack his Orthodox neighbor.

    Ukraine not only has a higher percentage of Orthodox Christians but a much higher ratio that attend weekly service. Russia is filled with mafia type Orthodox that really just want fire insurance. Meaning they want to go to heaven after a life of sinning.

    Atheism continues to expand in Russia
    https://www.rbth.com/lifestyle/333670-more-and-more-russians-are-becoming-atheists

    Too bad that Nicholas 2 didn't have the balls to simply put a bullet in Lenin. Russia was never known for its moral values and then the Communists ramped up atheistic amorality.

    Replies: @Wokechoke

    , @silviosilver
    @Dmitry


    When old people complain in Russia, it’s usually related to what is allowed in media, instead of what is allowed in real life.
     
    It's a perfectly valid distinction. Permission vs promotion. If I were "boss of America," despite my revulsion of the homosexual act, I'd happily permit it. Doesn't really bother me at all that it exists and I wouldn't waste any effort trying to stamp it out or penalize it. But why in the world promote it? Why celebrate it? Why elevate it to equal status with heterosexuality? Why kid ourselves that homosexuality, in and of itself, is some tremendous boon we should all be grateful to have in our lives?

    Replies: @Matra

  678. Here’s the Insta of the journalist and “human rights” person who was eating 20 minutes before the place (in Kramatorsk) was hit. Note the US flag patch on the helmet of the soldier giving first aid in the video.

    https://www.instagram.com/p/CuAJb1iKLIG/

    Also note the comments.

    “Why the hell you posted the now deleted photo from the restaurant? Are you stupid to take and post pictures like that? Hope you will be kick out from Ukraine as soon as possible!”

    Anyone know what the deleted photo was?

    “just now the news came out that zelensky approved english as official. so in the video everyone immediately speaks english. ukraine is a progressive country”

    Ah, I see. A missile lands close by, causing devastation, and your first instinctive reactions are in a foreign language. Crap. In video from the frontline, Russian speaking Ukrainians under heavy fire speak in their mother tongue, as any of us would under great stress. I imagine most of the English speakers are native English speakers i.e. not Ukrainians.

    In this tweet the guy saying “there are soldiers under here” sounds South African to me, not British.

    “This is where we always ate our dinners” says US mercenary. Down thread a Ukrainian soldier says he was there, but with “other humanitarian aid volunteers “.

    This looks conclusive, unless you believe (quite possible given propaganda levels) that Russia is trying to kill as many civilians as possible.

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2023/jun/28/russia-ukraine-war-live-kramatorsk-death-toll-rises-nato-to-strengthen-eastern-defences?page=with:block-649c1c418f08deda08fdd716#block-649c1c418f08deda08fdd716

    Ukrainian secret service arrests man it accuses of helping Russians carry out attack on Kramatorsk
    Ukraine’s counter-intelligence service says it has arrested “an agent of the Russian special services” who it accuses of helping Russia direct a missile strike that killed 10 people in the Ukrainian city of Kramatorsk.

    The Security Service of Ukraine (SSU) said the man lived in the city and was an employee at a local gas transportation company.

    Vasyl Malyuk, the head of the Security Service of Ukraine, said in a statement: “The agent of the Russian Federation will definitely answer to the Ukrainian court. But his detention is also a signal to all other adjusters and traitors who work for the enemy. Remember – the punishment is inevitable!”

    He added: “We constantly conduct legal work and continue to collect evidence for international courts.”

    I think “adjuster” is what we’d call a “spotter” – someone who identifies a target and calls in a strike on it.

    I tried posting some of this at Sailer’s this morning, but his “at whim” policy means it’s still awaiting approval after 8 hours. One can’t help noticing that he leaps on stories that support the US line on Russia (2 posts in an hour on the chef’s March On Moscow) while ignoring stuff that contradicts it. We all have our biases.

    • Replies: @YetAnotherAnon
    @YetAnotherAnon

    Steve Sailer has still not approved my post as above, but he approved one on a different subject that I sent an hour ago...

    , @YetAnotherAnon
    @YetAnotherAnon

    The deleted photo was I think of the guys pizza and Carlsberg meal, "20 minutes ago", in which you can see two soldiers in the far background.

    , @QCIC
    @YetAnotherAnon

    How is it possible anyone is living a normal life 30 miles from Bakhmut?????

    I think if the heaviest artillery and hand-to-hand combat battle in 75 years goes on for months 30 miles away you are supposed to leave!

    Without looking, I don't doubt that a Russian missile or two could have impacted there and I also don't doubt it could be a Ukrainian false flag event.

    It doesn't matter. War is hell. Ukraine needs to surrender while there are still some Ukrainians left.

  679. @AP
    @Mikhail


    Tatars were never a majority in Crimea from the 1897 census to the present
     
    That’s not what I said.

    Tatars outnumbered Russians in 1897 and Russians didn’t become a majority until they expelled the Tatar natives during World War II.

    the Rus Slav presence there
     
    Is reading maps hard for you?

    Rus presence was limited to 1% of Crimean territory, the tiny corner near the Kerch bridge.

    That’s all that can be claimed based on medieval Rus presence.

    Your argument is as dumb as claiming some Swedish right to all of North America because Delaware was once a Swedish colony.

    the core group associated with the Crimean Tatars came after the Rus Slav presence.
     
    Crimean Tatars are genetically about 40% Asian. More than Turks in Turkey, but still mostly local.

    And again, “Rus Slav presence” was in 1% of Crimea.

    Replies: @Mikhail

    Your argument is as dumb as claiming some Swedish right to all of North America because Delaware was once a Swedish colony.

    An asinine comparison on Delaware’s history. Swedes have been long gone from having it as a colony. The overall compassion with Crimea doesn’t jive given –

    Tatars were never a majority in Crimea from the 1897 census to the present, in addition to not having predated the Rus Slav presence there. To simply say that the Tatars are a mix of different people in Crimea including those predating the Rus Slav presence suggestively omits that the same can be said of Rus Slavs, in addition to noting that the core group associated with the Crimean Tatars came after the Rus Slav presence.

  680. @Mr. Hack
    @Mikhail

    I don't understand your sudden interest in Yatsenyuk, be it him being viewed through a prism of Wokechoke or Nuland? I reviewed his bio within Wikipedia and see that he never really was for closer cooperation with Russia, but a staunch supporter of an independent Ukraine within a European vector. So he hates "Nazis", so do most Ukrainians, his latest manifestation is somewhat perplexing, perhaps that's why you find him so interesting?

    Replies: @Mikhail

    I don’t understand your sudden interest in Yatsenyuk, be it him being viewed through a prism of Wokechoke or Nuland? I reviewed his bio within Wikipedia and see that he never really was for closer cooperation with Russia, but a staunch supporter of an independent Ukraine within a European vector. So he hates “Nazis”, so do most Ukrainians, his latest manifestation is somewhat perplexing, perhaps that’s why you find him so interesting?

    Was simply asking if that presented video (from my prior comments) was a fake? Sudden Death gave his belief on why it is. If you go back further, I heard that Yats was once favorable to some loose union arrangement with Russia. I’d have to check on that.

  681. @AP
    @Wokechoke


    While the Russians were battling it out with the Turks from Ivan Grozny to Peter the Great era through Elizabeth to Catherine and finally Alexander and Nicholas where were these Poles again?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish–Ottoman_War_(1672–1676)

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish–Ottoman_War_(1683–1699)

    There’s around 30 years of kinetic contact. That’s about it.
     
    You lie by omission. Full list is here:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish%E2%80%93Ottoman_Wars

    At the Battle of Khotyn in 1621, a Polish-Ukrainian force defeated a massive Ottoman-Tatar army that was about the same size as the one that would be defeated at Vienna a few generations later:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Khotyn_(1621)

    Compared to this…

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Russo-Turkish_wars

    400 years of fighting the Turks around the Black Sea and the Danube and Volga Rivers.

     

    The Polish victories over the Ottomsns were far more consequential for European history and for keeping the Turks out of Europe then were the Russian battles with them over some peripheral areas, or later victories when the Ottomans were a fading power and no longer much of a threat. When the Turks were a superpower, at their peak, the Poles fought and defeated them. Russia mostly just picked over the leftovers afterward.

    What were the Poles doing as the Russians finally ejected the Turk from the northern rim of the Black Sea? Oh that’s right, preparing an all out assault on Moscow in cahoots with Napoleon.
     
    Russia wanted an alliance with the Turks and had one for a few years, before the Turks rejected the Russians.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russo-Ottoman_alliance

    “The Russo-Ottoman alliance was a defensive alliance between the Russian Empire and the Ottoman Empire, directed against France between 1799 and 1806, during the Napoleonic Wars.”

    Replies: @Mikhail, @Mr. XYZ

    A Cossack-Polish alliance against the Turks. That instance was the first scene in the Hollywood version of Taras Bulba. In that scene, after the Turks were defeated the Cossacks and Poles said to each other, now we can be normal and start fighting again between us.

  682. Beautiful footage of a Russian SU-25 being taken out by a manpad

    YOU TOO CAN DIE FOR THE DICTATOR AND HIS WAR THAT HE CAN’T EXPLAIN

    VISIT YOUR LOCAL RECRUITER TODAY

    OR WAIT UNTIL THEY VISIT YOU

    • Troll: YetAnotherAnon
  683. @Dmitry
    @QCIC

    In the reality of practical life, Russia is more socially/sexually liberal than many Western countries, so people are not going to protest against the brothels, accept this is a normal part of life, perhaps not liking the billboards however because of the negative image to the city. Even I saw, local media in the recent years in Russia is promoting prostitution as a good job for women, with high salary.

    But the rules of speech are a bit different. For example, in the Soviet culture they had kind of Victorian ideas about what they allow in mass culture. Even in the 19th century Russian empire like this, with the concept to read sexual literature only in French language, while Russian literature would have rules so it avoids sex. When old people complain in Russia, it's usually related to what is allowed in media, instead of what is allowed in real life.

    If you read the books of a historian who is famous in Russia (Boris Mironov), in traditional Russian village even in 19th century they couldn't impose Christian rules about sexuality, against more liberal traditional views. According to Mironov, this is one of the many reasons why the Church has to invest a large part of its project into the villages in the 19th century, to try to educate the villagers, not attaining success.

    -

    As for why the 21st century Russian government has been so successful to market to rightwing Americans who logically choose a socially conservative country, not socially liberal country? AP in the forum is an example of this. I think it's an interesting dialectic of the Cold War. One of the changes in the school system in Russia in the last decade, they write in the lesson guide the teachers need to promote "family values", which is terms from the 1970s Republican Party.

    It's the normal practice in Russia, where the explicit culture is imported, here they import in the fashions in America and Fox News, while real underlying Russian culture doesn't change under the surface for centuries.

    It's also true, rightwing voters seem to like more "sexually liberated" politicians, with less "family values". The rightwing voters like Trump, Berlusconi, Johnson, also Putin and a lot of the officials.

    Replies: @Another Polish Perspective, @John Johnson, @silviosilver

    If you read the books of a historian who is famous in Russia (Boris Mironov), in traditional Russian village even in 19th century they couldn’t impose Christian rules about sexuality, against more liberal traditional views.

    Yeah, when I researched cousin marriages around the world, I met this phenomenon, a kind of polygamy actually… fathers living with sons’ wives. No wonder it could later produce some unintentional cousin marriages.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snokhachestvo

    As for the Orthodox Church, I read once a novel (Russian but in German translation) which was taking place in a village belonging to a monastery, and almost every monk had his lover in this village… And everyone around took it for granted, as almost natural…

    I suppose such attitudes could be bred in Russia due to isolation of such communities, and in this sense, insularity seems to free the more animalistic side of human.

    • Replies: @Dmitry
    @Another Polish Perspective

    A difference for Russian peasants compared to some other cultures, it wasn't important if the woman was virgin before marriage i.e. there was a more sexual liberal attitude in the Russian villages compared to some other areas of the world.

    They also don't live in the nuclear family and there were those famous customs like father-in-law sleeping with the childs/daughter-in-law.

    Although this isn't a natural situation, for serfs a larger part of the population are living in an intermediate situation kind of less extreme part of a spectrum towards situations like African Americans in slavery.

    By second half of the 19th century, there were modern Western nuclear family in the urban middle class and aristocracy. By later 19th century, for upper class there was lowered levels of male authority and large popularity of modern trends like feminism for the educated women.

    This is part of the result of being developing country which is culture importer. A part of the country can be living like medieval times, another part can be followers of the most advanced fashions and culture, like they cultural vanguard.

  684. @Dmitry
    @QCIC

    In the reality of practical life, Russia is more socially/sexually liberal than many Western countries, so people are not going to protest against the brothels, accept this is a normal part of life, perhaps not liking the billboards however because of the negative image to the city. Even I saw, local media in the recent years in Russia is promoting prostitution as a good job for women, with high salary.

    But the rules of speech are a bit different. For example, in the Soviet culture they had kind of Victorian ideas about what they allow in mass culture. Even in the 19th century Russian empire like this, with the concept to read sexual literature only in French language, while Russian literature would have rules so it avoids sex. When old people complain in Russia, it's usually related to what is allowed in media, instead of what is allowed in real life.

    If you read the books of a historian who is famous in Russia (Boris Mironov), in traditional Russian village even in 19th century they couldn't impose Christian rules about sexuality, against more liberal traditional views. According to Mironov, this is one of the many reasons why the Church has to invest a large part of its project into the villages in the 19th century, to try to educate the villagers, not attaining success.

    -

    As for why the 21st century Russian government has been so successful to market to rightwing Americans who logically choose a socially conservative country, not socially liberal country? AP in the forum is an example of this. I think it's an interesting dialectic of the Cold War. One of the changes in the school system in Russia in the last decade, they write in the lesson guide the teachers need to promote "family values", which is terms from the 1970s Republican Party.

    It's the normal practice in Russia, where the explicit culture is imported, here they import in the fashions in America and Fox News, while real underlying Russian culture doesn't change under the surface for centuries.

    It's also true, rightwing voters seem to like more "sexually liberated" politicians, with less "family values". The rightwing voters like Trump, Berlusconi, Johnson, also Putin and a lot of the officials.

    Replies: @Another Polish Perspective, @John Johnson, @silviosilver

    In the reality of practical life, Russia is more socially/sexually liberal than many Western countries, so people are not going to protest against the brothels, accept this is a normal part of life, perhaps not liking the billboards however because of the negative image to the city. Even I saw, local media in the recent years in Russia is promoting prostitution as a good job for women, with high salary.

    Yes and this is partly why they have the world’s highest abortion rate and Europe’s highest HIV rate.

    The have an urban Slavic atheistic core that views abortion as perfectly acceptable birth control.

    Get drunk, get an abortion and then get back to the clubs.

    The Communists created an atheistic hole within the cities that will never be repaired. They don’t have gay parades but view abortion as part of being single.

    The bitter dwarf king could end abortion by decree but instead decided to attack his Orthodox neighbor.

    Ukraine not only has a higher percentage of Orthodox Christians but a much higher ratio that attend weekly service. Russia is filled with mafia type Orthodox that really just want fire insurance. Meaning they want to go to heaven after a life of sinning.

    Atheism continues to expand in Russia
    https://www.rbth.com/lifestyle/333670-more-and-more-russians-are-becoming-atheists

    Too bad that Nicholas 2 didn’t have the balls to simply put a bullet in Lenin. Russia was never known for its moral values and then the Communists ramped up atheistic amorality.

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @John Johnson

    Putin halved abortion rates.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

  685. @Anatoly Karlin
    @Mr. XYZ


    Maybe, but would the types who are particularly eager to do that be of particularly high human capital to begin with?
     
    Nationalist EHC will be first to defect from its own societies to recreate an "imagined past" of their culture in network states with "aligned" co-ideologists.

    https://twitter.com/powerfultakes/status/1617559733266776064

    (I do not claim to be EHC. I am merely an "object", a "thing", or a "whatever" that tries to observe and study EHC. However, I could certainly see myself holding an NFT denoting membership of a transhumanist-themed and a Tsarpunk-themed transnational network state; considering cosmism originated in the latter, they would not even be contradictory).

    In fact, this will arguably be a self-reinforcing process, to the extent that these dynamics suck away oxygen and EHC from nationalist/identitarian organizations rooted within and playing by the rules of the traditional nation-state. They are going to become even less prestigious than they are today.

    BTW, before your recent conversion, did you not view a super-powerful Russia (one that includes both Ukraine and Belarus) as a threat to network states?
     
    One of the bullish factors for network states is that many of the Great Powers are genuinely spiteful towards each other and will forge alliances of convenience with network states, proverbially selling us the rope with which we'll hang them. "Many such cases" historically.

    Regarding myself personally - I have never hid my contempt towards small nation nationalisms, which are parochial by definition.

    Alternate history scenarios aside, Russia has proven itself a "small" nation, its memes totally Americanized and ruinously so, continuing being a classic Russian nationalist at this point is only slightly less risible than being, say, a Polish or Romanian or even Ukrainian nationalist. I still retain my viewpoint that there is no reason for cultures that do not appear as playable factions in the Civilization games to exist. So for me this "transition" is both logical and at this point very psychologically easy.

    The only nationalisms that still make sense are American, Chinese, and perhaps Indian but they all come with their own thicket of issues. It's hard to reconcile with American multiculturalism and innately universalist characteristics (there's a reason why any true American nationalism defaults to White Nationalism which is both universal and transracial), with the Fourteen Principles of Xi Jinping Thought, with Indians basically being this melange of peoples who are as differentiated from each other as Europeans.

    French, German, etc. nationalism don't make any sense either at this point, despite their once formidable cultures. Visit London or Paris. All very bullish for network states.

    Replies: @songbird, @Mr. XYZ, @Ivashka the fool, @Mr. XYZ

    Nationalist EHC will be first to defect from its own societies to recreate an “imagined past” of their culture in network states with “aligned” co-ideologists.

    Didn’t you previously say that there isn’t all that much nationalist EHC to begin with, at least relatively speaking, though?

    https://www.unz.com/akarlin/the-rights-human-capital-problem/

    The EHC that they do have could potentially be attracted by network states, but still, would one prefer to be a big fish in a small pond or a small fish in a big pond? Right now, right-wing EHC such as Rod Dreher can move to places like Hungary (or Poland, I guess) while still remaining within the world-empire known as the EU.

    One of the bullish factors for network states is that many of the Great Powers are genuinely spiteful towards each other and will forge alliances of convenience with network states, proverbially selling us the rope with which we’ll hang them. “Many such cases” historically.

    By that logic, though, why aim to destroy nation-states? Simply to weaken them?

    Regarding myself personally – I have never hid my contempt towards small nation nationalisms, which are parochial by definition.

    Alternate history scenarios aside, Russia has proven itself a “small” nation, its memes totally Americanized and ruinously so, continuing being a classic Russian nationalist at this point is only slightly less risible than being, say, a Polish or Romanian or even Ukrainian nationalist.

    Ukrainian nationalism actually attracts elite human capital, both at home and abroad, so in this regard it’s considerably different from these other nationalisms, even from Russian nationalism. In a world where EHC will be dominant, Ukrainian nationalism will survive and even thrive, most likely. Don’t worry about that.

    I also wouldn’t call either Poland or Ukraine (or even Finland) joke countries since all of them have managed to hold their own against Russia in a major war (1919-1921, 1939-1940, 2022-present).

    I still retain my viewpoint that there is no reason for cultures that do not appear as playable factions in the Civilization games to exist. So for me this “transition” is both logical and at this point very psychologically easy.

    You think and sound like a Social Darwinist. In 1900, there was widespread logic that countries that were insufficiently accomplished don’t deserve to have/keep their independence. Maybe we should return to colonialism for the unaccomplished countries, since their independence doesn’t mean much anyway?

    I could just as easily have said before the current Ukrainian war that Russia does not deserve to exist as its own civilizational space (and that thus Russia should let the EU have Ukraine unopposed) because Russia (unlike the EU) produces nowhere near enough elite science production or R & D spending to qualify as its own civilizational space, something that would not have been meaningfully changed by Russia conquering and annexing Ukraine and Belarus.

    The only nationalisms that still make sense are American, Chinese, and perhaps Indian but they all come with their own thicket of issues.

    Why not European nationalism as well? The EU has more people than the US has, likely a larger smart fraction than India has, and a comparable average IQ to the US (though very possibly a smaller smart fraction).

    If you have previously argued that 200 million people was enough for Russia to become its own civilizational space (which I’m inclined to disagree with), then why is 500+ million people not enough for the EU to likewise become its own civilizational space, at least if it will actually have the desire to do this? The EU can be a separate “junior” civilizational pole in the West besides the more “senior” US/Anglosphere. (Junior and senior in terms of their prestige, not their age.)

    It’s hard to reconcile with American multiculturalism and innately universalist characteristics (there’s a reason why any true American nationalism defaults to White Nationalism which is both universal and transracial),

    It’s very easy to have a big-tent American nationalism, no? Similar for other Anglosphere nationalisms, especially in Anglosphere settler colonies such as Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, no? One can admire white people for largely building the US but still embrace others who want to be American if they’re culturally compatible, can successfully assimilate and contribute, et cetera.

    with the Fourteen Principles of Xi Jinping Thought,

    How’s that incompatible with Chinese nationalism?

    with Indians basically being this melange of peoples who are as differentiated from each other as Europeans.

    Indians have a largely common Hindu identity to unite them, just like Europeans have a largely common historical Christian identity to unite them, not to mention the general achievements and accomplishments of Western civilization.

    French, German, etc. nationalism don’t make any sense either at this point, despite their once formidable cultures. Visit London or Paris. All very bullish for network states.

    Those nationalisms, perhaps not, but European nationalism appears to be quite popular and successful, no?

    BTW, if small state nationalism should be rejected, then this should also apply to Israeli Jewish nationalism, right? Israel does not have anywhere near large enough economies of scale to become a global power, after all.

    • Replies: @Anatoly Karlin
    @Mr. XYZ

    Correct, I absolutely am a Social Darwinist.

    https://twitter.com/RichardHanania/status/1665907732162174976

    Nation-states are going to zero. 🐻📉

    Consequently, I intend to front-run and accelerate that process. 💯


    Ukrainian nationalism actually attracts elite human capital...
     
    Ukrainian nationalism is attractive to EHC only to the extent its an underdog. The Azovites will rightly be kicked to the curb once they outlive their usefulness and it's time to get progressive.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Mr. XYZ, @AP

    , @QCIC
    @Mr. XYZ

    Speaking of Israel,

    The upper tier of World Judaism has long been the example of your stateless, EHC, "cloud community".

    If you want to do it, learn from them. Do not expect to outsmart them with blockchain or any other widespread tech, they have been doing this for a very long time and are very adaptive. You may find that when you look at the nasty underbelly of how they can pull this off a different approach starts to look better.

    Having said that, I think some version of the stateless society in LEO, on the moon and in the asteroids is a worthy vision despite how barren these places are. Maybe that is a feature. This rock we are on may be lost.

    Sorry if you already covered this.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

  686. @Anatoly Karlin
    @Ivashka the fool

    Funnily enough I met a Serb nationalist in Belgrade who had come to very similar ideas about creating a "Cloud Serbia".

    Nations that have ended up historical losers are I think obviously more receptive to these ideas and it's logical that their nationalists in particular could be icebreakers for this vision.


    Although I am pretty sure that TPTB will crush such attempts.
     
    A plurality of the world's major polities (US/EU/China/India) would have to ban decentralized smart contract cryptocurrencies to kill this off, which is possible, but not likely ATM.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Ivashka the fool

    IMHO, Serbian and Russian nationalists should simply try to create their own unique national spaces within a Greater EU. I doubt that the West would give too much of a rat’s ass about Serbian or Russian nationalism so long as they did not desire to expand at their neighbors’ expense any longer. They would still push for a more inclusive Serbian/Russian nationalism, no doubt, but it would be less of an issue for them without ongoing military aggression by Russia.

    If one should also follow the long-term trends in elite human capital, then one should also be a eugenic pro-natalist in any scenario where AI does not fully replace humans since the percentage of elite human capital who are going to be pro-natalist should increase over time due to EHC breeders (Yes, they do exist: Amy Coney Barrett, Mitt Romney, Ben Shapiro, et cetera) making up a larger and larger percentage of the total EHC population over time. It’s similar to EHC not having kids in order to save the planet. This might be a huge thing among EHC right now, but it will be less so over time since the percentage of EHC who will have such attitudes will shrink over time since such EHC is being evolutionarily selected against.

    (And frankly, even a successful cure to aging won’t completely destroy pro-natalist attitudes since some people simply enjoy being parents. They could take a considerably longer time to do it if humans will have indefinite lifespans, but they should still get around to doing it sooner or later if they will genuinely want to do this.)

  687. @Anatoly Karlin
    @Mr. XYZ


    If one wants greater economies of scale, why not support pro-natalism as well?
     
    There is no such thing as "Western values" (claims otherwise are chauvinist). There are values embraced by elite human capital (EHC) and all societies converge to them as EHC wins argument after argument.

    Natalism is implicitly anti-feminist. EHC rejects natalism. However, EHC is much more open to positive eugenics.

    AIs are good but potentially dangerous. A biosingularity is safer.

    Advocating turning the West into a dump while not intending to subsequently stay in the West to deal with the results of the mess that you helped create strikes me as being awfully disgraceful.
     
    EHC laughs at the idea of feeling some attachment to arbitray scraps of land, LOL.

    EHC doesn't fear competition. It thrives wherever it goes. If parts of the world landscape known as Western becomes dumps, EHC is free to create its own functional communities elsewhere, including in the Third World.

    BTW, off-topic, but in regards to a one-world government, even one noted supporter of open borders (Ilya Somin) has pointed out that a one-world government can result in a global tyranny with no exit options
     
    The main point is to collapse all existing nation-states along with Open Borders simultaneously. The organizing principle would be network states that own parcels of land in different areas of the world, secured on decentralized blockchain.

    BTW, do you acknowledge that Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine was a huge mistake since it denied tens/hundreds of thousands of people the chance to get access to anti-aging technology by getting killed prematurely...
     
    Yes, it was obviously a glaring demonstration of the total bankruptcy of nationalism and right-wing conservatism and associated EHC-uncompliant ideologies, and a strong signal that the world would be better off without them.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Mr. XYZ, @Emil Nikola Richard, @Yevardian, @Mr. XYZ

    There is no such thing as “Western values” (claims otherwise are chauvinist).

    Western values are those values which Westerners embrace, especially but not only their EHC. Democracy good, LGBTQ+ rights good, free speech good, free expression good, totalitarianism bad (unless perhaps it’s Woke, unfortunately), conquering unwilling countries is bad, et cetera.

  688. @Mr. Hack
    @songbird

    Not just soaps, but really good popular Turkish music too:

    https://open.spotify.com/album/2zuQMRFkZLLcgCGTH5vt7x?si=bvHvBqXhQaqrO_RccuYLZw

    She inspires the writing of Ukrainian novels and historical TV dramas too.

    Replies: @songbird

    Robert E. Howard’s Red Sonja character was supposed to be sister to Roxelana. They didn’t get along.

    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @songbird

    For real? Their youngest sibling, their little brother must be Little Nikita. :-)

    Replies: @songbird

  689. @Emil Nikola Richard
    @songbird

    Urbit!

    ha ha ha ha sometimes I crack myself up

    Replies: @songbird

    One if the biggest obstacles to these kind of libertarian-technical solutions to modern problems is that even small energy barriers are big filters, preventing economies of scale.

    How many people switched from YouTube to odyssee, to follow their favorite political commentators? How much of netflix’s economic model is built on people too lazy to cancel their membership?

  690. @YetAnotherAnon
    Here's the Insta of the journalist and "human rights" person who was eating 20 minutes before the place (in Kramatorsk) was hit. Note the US flag patch on the helmet of the soldier giving first aid in the video.

    https://www.instagram.com/p/CuAJb1iKLIG/

    Also note the comments.

    "Why the hell you posted the now deleted photo from the restaurant? Are you stupid to take and post pictures like that? Hope you will be kick out from Ukraine as soon as possible!"

    Anyone know what the deleted photo was?

    "just now the news came out that zelensky approved english as official. so in the video everyone immediately speaks english. ukraine is a progressive country"

    Ah, I see. A missile lands close by, causing devastation, and your first instinctive reactions are in a foreign language. Crap. In video from the frontline, Russian speaking Ukrainians under heavy fire speak in their mother tongue, as any of us would under great stress. I imagine most of the English speakers are native English speakers i.e. not Ukrainians.

    In this tweet the guy saying "there are soldiers under here" sounds South African to me, not British.

    https://twitter.com/ArthurM40330824/status/1674086499350900736

    "This is where we always ate our dinners" says US mercenary. Down thread a Ukrainian soldier says he was there, but with "other humanitarian aid volunteers ".

    https://twitter.com/MyLordBebo/status/1674069796470546433

    This looks conclusive, unless you believe (quite possible given propaganda levels) that Russia is trying to kill as many civilians as possible.

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2023/jun/28/russia-ukraine-war-live-kramatorsk-death-toll-rises-nato-to-strengthen-eastern-defences?page=with:block-649c1c418f08deda08fdd716#block-649c1c418f08deda08fdd716

    Ukrainian secret service arrests man it accuses of helping Russians carry out attack on Kramatorsk
    Ukraine’s counter-intelligence service says it has arrested “an agent of the Russian special services” who it accuses of helping Russia direct a missile strike that killed 10 people in the Ukrainian city of Kramatorsk.

    The Security Service of Ukraine (SSU) said the man lived in the city and was an employee at a local gas transportation company.

    Vasyl Malyuk, the head of the Security Service of Ukraine, said in a statement: “The agent of the Russian Federation will definitely answer to the Ukrainian court. But his detention is also a signal to all other adjusters and traitors who work for the enemy. Remember – the punishment is inevitable!”

    He added: “We constantly conduct legal work and continue to collect evidence for international courts.”

     

    I think "adjuster" is what we'd call a "spotter" - someone who identifies a target and calls in a strike on it.

    I tried posting some of this at Sailer's this morning, but his "at whim" policy means it's still awaiting approval after 8 hours. One can't help noticing that he leaps on stories that support the US line on Russia (2 posts in an hour on the chef's March On Moscow) while ignoring stuff that contradicts it. We all have our biases.

    Replies: @YetAnotherAnon, @YetAnotherAnon, @QCIC

    Steve Sailer has still not approved my post as above, but he approved one on a different subject that I sent an hour ago…

  691. @Mr. XYZ
    @Anatoly Karlin


    Nationalist EHC will be first to defect from its own societies to recreate an “imagined past” of their culture in network states with “aligned” co-ideologists.
     
    Didn't you previously say that there isn't all that much nationalist EHC to begin with, at least relatively speaking, though?

    https://www.unz.com/akarlin/the-rights-human-capital-problem/

    The EHC that they do have could potentially be attracted by network states, but still, would one prefer to be a big fish in a small pond or a small fish in a big pond? Right now, right-wing EHC such as Rod Dreher can move to places like Hungary (or Poland, I guess) while still remaining within the world-empire known as the EU.

    One of the bullish factors for network states is that many of the Great Powers are genuinely spiteful towards each other and will forge alliances of convenience with network states, proverbially selling us the rope with which we’ll hang them. “Many such cases” historically.
     
    By that logic, though, why aim to destroy nation-states? Simply to weaken them?

    Regarding myself personally – I have never hid my contempt towards small nation nationalisms, which are parochial by definition.

    Alternate history scenarios aside, Russia has proven itself a “small” nation, its memes totally Americanized and ruinously so, continuing being a classic Russian nationalist at this point is only slightly less risible than being, say, a Polish or Romanian or even Ukrainian nationalist.
     
    Ukrainian nationalism actually attracts elite human capital, both at home and abroad, so in this regard it's considerably different from these other nationalisms, even from Russian nationalism. In a world where EHC will be dominant, Ukrainian nationalism will survive and even thrive, most likely. Don't worry about that.

    I also wouldn't call either Poland or Ukraine (or even Finland) joke countries since all of them have managed to hold their own against Russia in a major war (1919-1921, 1939-1940, 2022-present).

    I still retain my viewpoint that there is no reason for cultures that do not appear as playable factions in the Civilization games to exist. So for me this “transition” is both logical and at this point very psychologically easy.
     
    You think and sound like a Social Darwinist. In 1900, there was widespread logic that countries that were insufficiently accomplished don't deserve to have/keep their independence. Maybe we should return to colonialism for the unaccomplished countries, since their independence doesn't mean much anyway?

    I could just as easily have said before the current Ukrainian war that Russia does not deserve to exist as its own civilizational space (and that thus Russia should let the EU have Ukraine unopposed) because Russia (unlike the EU) produces nowhere near enough elite science production or R & D spending to qualify as its own civilizational space, something that would not have been meaningfully changed by Russia conquering and annexing Ukraine and Belarus.

    The only nationalisms that still make sense are American, Chinese, and perhaps Indian but they all come with their own thicket of issues.
     
    Why not European nationalism as well? The EU has more people than the US has, likely a larger smart fraction than India has, and a comparable average IQ to the US (though very possibly a smaller smart fraction).

    If you have previously argued that 200 million people was enough for Russia to become its own civilizational space (which I'm inclined to disagree with), then why is 500+ million people not enough for the EU to likewise become its own civilizational space, at least if it will actually have the desire to do this? The EU can be a separate "junior" civilizational pole in the West besides the more "senior" US/Anglosphere. (Junior and senior in terms of their prestige, not their age.)

    It’s hard to reconcile with American multiculturalism and innately universalist characteristics (there’s a reason why any true American nationalism defaults to White Nationalism which is both universal and transracial),
     
    It's very easy to have a big-tent American nationalism, no? Similar for other Anglosphere nationalisms, especially in Anglosphere settler colonies such as Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, no? One can admire white people for largely building the US but still embrace others who want to be American if they're culturally compatible, can successfully assimilate and contribute, et cetera.

    with the Fourteen Principles of Xi Jinping Thought,
     
    How's that incompatible with Chinese nationalism?

    with Indians basically being this melange of peoples who are as differentiated from each other as Europeans.
     
    Indians have a largely common Hindu identity to unite them, just like Europeans have a largely common historical Christian identity to unite them, not to mention the general achievements and accomplishments of Western civilization.

    French, German, etc. nationalism don’t make any sense either at this point, despite their once formidable cultures. Visit London or Paris. All very bullish for network states.

     

    Those nationalisms, perhaps not, but European nationalism appears to be quite popular and successful, no?

    BTW, if small state nationalism should be rejected, then this should also apply to Israeli Jewish nationalism, right? Israel does not have anywhere near large enough economies of scale to become a global power, after all.

    Replies: @Anatoly Karlin, @QCIC

    Correct, I absolutely am a Social Darwinist.

    Nation-states are going to zero. 🐻📉

    Consequently, I intend to front-run and accelerate that process. 💯

    Ukrainian nationalism actually attracts elite human capital…

    Ukrainian nationalism is attractive to EHC only to the extent its an underdog. The Azovites will rightly be kicked to the curb once they outlive their usefulness and it’s time to get progressive.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @Anatoly Karlin


    Ukrainian nationalism is attractive to EHC only to the extent its an underdog. The Azovites will rightly be kicked to the curb once they outlive their usefulness and it’s time to get progressive.
     
    Ukrainian nationalism isn't just Azov. What about all of those elite Ukrainian econ majors who volunteered for service in the Ukrainian military when Russia invaded, for instance? They're also Ukrainian nationalists. Some of them subsequently got killed, but many probably survived and will help build and maintain a more respectable Ukrainian nationalism in the post-war era.

    In fact, since EHC is dominant, Azov-style Ukrainian nationalism should become less prevalent over time and be replaced by the more respectable Ukrainian nationalism of elite Ukrainian econ majors, et cetera. This should also help Ukrainian EU aspirations by making Ukraine look more civilized, especially if over the next couple of decades Ukraine can also successfully reduce its corruption rate down to Polish levels (a difficult task, but not impossible)--which, in turn, would make Ukraine look not only civilized, but also clean, organized, and relatively honest as well, a huge plus for the EU as it still actively seeks new potential members.

    And there is also (Pan-)European nationalism. Some intellectuals have been attracted to it for decades. Some of the Hapsburgs, for instance, or Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi.

    Also, in regards to network states, some Germans have moved to Paraguay in recent years in response to Germany becoming too totalitarian (COVID vaccine mandates and lockdowns) and too diverse (Muslims):

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R-x46MkYr5Q

    But this hasn't become a mass movement yet and for network states to truly rival the big nation-states/nation-empires, network states would need populations in the hundreds of millions. Else, at best, they would simply become another Singapore or two or three or five or ten or twenty. Very nice and impressive places to live in, especially if they are of high human capital, and certainly nice political and social models for the rest of the world to take a look at, but also certainly nowhere near being actual world-powers.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @Mr. XYZ

    , @Mr. XYZ
    @Anatoly Karlin

    BTW, I have previously posted this yesterday evening, but do you agree that if one adopts an EHC-deterministic view of history, then the collapse of the USSR and the failure to regather the Russian lands was much more preordained than was previously believed? After all, as per the maps that I posted above yesterday evening, both Kiev and Galicia, likely the two biggest centers of Ukrainian EHC even back then, already opposed keeping the Soviet Union even back in March 1991, before the August 1991 coup attempt. This coup attempt simply massively accelerated the process of Soviet disintegration, but even without it, Ukraine had decent odds of eventually becoming independent just so long as the USSR would have remained free for a sufficiently long time period due to Ukrainian EHC being able to win over a lot of Ukrainian normies to the cause of Ukrainian independence, no? This is in fact what actually happened to a sizable extent between 1991 and 2013-2014 in real life, when Russia's attempt to reintegrate Ukraine ended up being thwarted by the Maidan Revolution, which already supported the political aspirations of half of Ukraine's population (and more than that of its youth) back then. The process of accepting Ukrainian independence and Ukraine's alignment with the West accelerated after 2014 and even more so after 2022.

    Accepting the EHC-deterministic view of history, one could also argue that Ukraine had decent odds of eventually becoming independent even in a non-Bolshevik Russia, just so long as it would have actually remained free for a sufficiently long period of time. After all, didn't Ukrainian EHC in Kiev and Galicia already support Ukrainian independence, at least as a long-term goal, even back in the 1910s? This might help explain why, in exile in the 1920s and possibly beyond as well, former SR leader Viktor Chernov actually was willing to support Ukrainian (and other) independence if Ukrainians themselves would have actually wanted it:

    https://www.jstor.org/stable/20620631

    (You can read the full article for free by inserting the link above on Sci-Hub.)

    So, ultimately, I don't think that Russians should shed too many tears over the loss of Ukraine if one accepts EHC-determinism. What they should shed tears over, however, is the fact that Russia currently has only 150 million people instead of a whopping 300 million people. But encouraging Israeli-style pro-natalism can help fix this problem if successful!

    , @AP
    @Anatoly Karlin

    What is EHC? I assume that the last two letters stand for "Human Capital?"

    Replies: @Anatoly Karlin, @Yahya, @Mr. XYZ

  692. @songbird
    @Mr. Hack

    Robert E. Howard's Red Sonja character was supposed to be sister to Roxelana. They didn't get along.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

    For real? Their youngest sibling, their little brother must be Little Nikita. 🙂

    • Replies: @songbird
    @Mr. Hack

    Have always enjoyed the stereotype of the fiery red-haired woman, but I, regret to say, have never observed it IRL.
    Don't know if it is universal, but it even seems to appeal to the Japanese.
    https://youtu.be/kBhbZMHgDqg

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

  693. @Anatoly Karlin
    @Mr. XYZ

    Correct, I absolutely am a Social Darwinist.

    https://twitter.com/RichardHanania/status/1665907732162174976

    Nation-states are going to zero. 🐻📉

    Consequently, I intend to front-run and accelerate that process. 💯


    Ukrainian nationalism actually attracts elite human capital...
     
    Ukrainian nationalism is attractive to EHC only to the extent its an underdog. The Azovites will rightly be kicked to the curb once they outlive their usefulness and it's time to get progressive.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Mr. XYZ, @AP

    Ukrainian nationalism is attractive to EHC only to the extent its an underdog. The Azovites will rightly be kicked to the curb once they outlive their usefulness and it’s time to get progressive.

    Ukrainian nationalism isn’t just Azov. What about all of those elite Ukrainian econ majors who volunteered for service in the Ukrainian military when Russia invaded, for instance? They’re also Ukrainian nationalists. Some of them subsequently got killed, but many probably survived and will help build and maintain a more respectable Ukrainian nationalism in the post-war era.

    In fact, since EHC is dominant, Azov-style Ukrainian nationalism should become less prevalent over time and be replaced by the more respectable Ukrainian nationalism of elite Ukrainian econ majors, et cetera. This should also help Ukrainian EU aspirations by making Ukraine look more civilized, especially if over the next couple of decades Ukraine can also successfully reduce its corruption rate down to Polish levels (a difficult task, but not impossible)–which, in turn, would make Ukraine look not only civilized, but also clean, organized, and relatively honest as well, a huge plus for the EU as it still actively seeks new potential members.

    And there is also (Pan-)European nationalism. Some intellectuals have been attracted to it for decades. Some of the Hapsburgs, for instance, or Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi.

    Also, in regards to network states, some Germans have moved to Paraguay in recent years in response to Germany becoming too totalitarian (COVID vaccine mandates and lockdowns) and too diverse (Muslims):

    But this hasn’t become a mass movement yet and for network states to truly rival the big nation-states/nation-empires, network states would need populations in the hundreds of millions. Else, at best, they would simply become another Singapore or two or three or five or ten or twenty. Very nice and impressive places to live in, especially if they are of high human capital, and certainly nice political and social models for the rest of the world to take a look at, but also certainly nowhere near being actual world-powers.

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @Mr. XYZ

    Kalergi was an Eurasian. Half Jap half German.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    , @Mr. XYZ
    @Mr. XYZ


    But this hasn’t become a mass movement yet and for network states to truly rival the big nation-states/nation-empires, network states would need populations in the hundreds of millions. Else, at best, they would simply become another Singapore or two or three or five or ten or twenty. Very nice and impressive places to live in, especially if they are of high human capital, and certainly nice political and social models for the rest of the world to take a look at, but also certainly nowhere near being actual world-powers.
     
    Other than organized religion and political parties, which organizations outside of modern nation-states have amassed memberships in the tens or hundreds of millions? The National Trust (in the UK), Boy Scouts, and Girl Scouts all have membership rolls in the 1-9 million range. All of this simply shows just how hard it is to create an organization independent of religion and political parties that gets extraordinarily large membership rolls that are able to effectively and successfully compete with nation-state world-powers.
  694. @Anatoly Karlin
    @Mr. XYZ

    Correct, I absolutely am a Social Darwinist.

    https://twitter.com/RichardHanania/status/1665907732162174976

    Nation-states are going to zero. 🐻📉

    Consequently, I intend to front-run and accelerate that process. 💯


    Ukrainian nationalism actually attracts elite human capital...
     
    Ukrainian nationalism is attractive to EHC only to the extent its an underdog. The Azovites will rightly be kicked to the curb once they outlive their usefulness and it's time to get progressive.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Mr. XYZ, @AP

    BTW, I have previously posted this yesterday evening, but do you agree that if one adopts an EHC-deterministic view of history, then the collapse of the USSR and the failure to regather the Russian lands was much more preordained than was previously believed? After all, as per the maps that I posted above yesterday evening, both Kiev and Galicia, likely the two biggest centers of Ukrainian EHC even back then, already opposed keeping the Soviet Union even back in March 1991, before the August 1991 coup attempt. This coup attempt simply massively accelerated the process of Soviet disintegration, but even without it, Ukraine had decent odds of eventually becoming independent just so long as the USSR would have remained free for a sufficiently long time period due to Ukrainian EHC being able to win over a lot of Ukrainian normies to the cause of Ukrainian independence, no? This is in fact what actually happened to a sizable extent between 1991 and 2013-2014 in real life, when Russia’s attempt to reintegrate Ukraine ended up being thwarted by the Maidan Revolution, which already supported the political aspirations of half of Ukraine’s population (and more than that of its youth) back then. The process of accepting Ukrainian independence and Ukraine’s alignment with the West accelerated after 2014 and even more so after 2022.

    Accepting the EHC-deterministic view of history, one could also argue that Ukraine had decent odds of eventually becoming independent even in a non-Bolshevik Russia, just so long as it would have actually remained free for a sufficiently long period of time. After all, didn’t Ukrainian EHC in Kiev and Galicia already support Ukrainian independence, at least as a long-term goal, even back in the 1910s? This might help explain why, in exile in the 1920s and possibly beyond as well, former SR leader Viktor Chernov actually was willing to support Ukrainian (and other) independence if Ukrainians themselves would have actually wanted it:

    https://www.jstor.org/stable/20620631

    (You can read the full article for free by inserting the link above on Sci-Hub.)

    So, ultimately, I don’t think that Russians should shed too many tears over the loss of Ukraine if one accepts EHC-determinism. What they should shed tears over, however, is the fact that Russia currently has only 150 million people instead of a whopping 300 million people. But encouraging Israeli-style pro-natalism can help fix this problem if successful!

  695. @A123
    @sudden death

    American support for funding Ukraine heads below 50%: (1)


    the share of Americans who say the U.S. is providing too much aid to Ukraine has steadily increased since the start of the war, largely driven by a shift among Republicans.

     
    https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/sr_2023.06.15_Ukraine-aid_1.png


     

    While this is still a plurality, it is clearly a trend headed towards ending the fighting.

    Another key factor to consider is intensity of support.


    Roughly a third of Americans (32%) say Russia’s invasion of Ukraine is a major threat to U.S. interests.

     
    https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/sr_2023.06.15_Ukraine-aid_2.png

     

    Numbers are headed downwards towards the January 2022 figures that predate the Russian SMO. The "inch deep" effect is in play. When given a choice to appear virtuous they take the top line answer that emphasizes that superficial platitude.

    More detailed questions show that there is a consistent negative slide in the popularity for funding Kiev aggression. The shrinking count for "major threat" means that translating superficiality into votes is becoming difficult to impossible. Especially in MAGA constituencies.

    If the DNC wants more money for Kiev offensive operations, they will have to make substantial concessions to the GOP House. Will Not-The-President Biden's administration prioritize funding Zelensky over domestic concerns? This would be highly problematic heading into the Presidential election cycle. However, who knows what blackmail material is out there pressuring the Veggie-in-Chief and his criminal offspring.

    PEACE 😇
    __________

    (1) https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/06/15/more-than-four-in-ten-republicans-now-say-the-us-is-providing-too-much-aid-to-ukraine/sr_2023-06-15_ukraine-aid_1/

    Replies: @keypusher

    According to a recent Reuters/Ipsos polls, 81% of Democrats, 56% of Republicans and 57% of independents favor supplying U.S. weapons to Ukraine.

    It’s a different poll, so maybe they’re just phrasing the questions differently, but overall support for sending US weapons (65%) was much higher than it was when they asked the question in May (46%).

    https://www.reuters.com/world/most-americans-support-us-arming-ukraine-reutersipsos-2023-06-28/

    So Prigozhin’s mutiny or whatever it was may have had an effect.

    • Thanks: Mr. XYZ
    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @keypusher

    Bless the Democrats for being so pro-Ukraine, pro-EU, and pro-West!

    The EU and West cannot be considered complete until Ukraine is a part of it!

    https://www.europarl.europa.eu/resources/library/images/20220202PHT22410/20220202PHT22410_original.jpg

    https://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/styles/embed_text_block/public/media/uploads/images/shutterstock_2168623881.jpg

    https://image.cnbcfm.com/api/v1/image/107071935-1654584010449-gettyimages-1241038515-zawrzel-ukrainia220601_npYrL.jpeg?v=1675074212

    https://images.carnegieendowment.org/images/article_images/1000x542_SE_23_June_Ukraine_EU_-_GettyImages-1241469924.jpg

  696. @John Johnson
    @Dmitry

    In the reality of practical life, Russia is more socially/sexually liberal than many Western countries, so people are not going to protest against the brothels, accept this is a normal part of life, perhaps not liking the billboards however because of the negative image to the city. Even I saw, local media in the recent years in Russia is promoting prostitution as a good job for women, with high salary.

    Yes and this is partly why they have the world's highest abortion rate and Europe's highest HIV rate.

    The have an urban Slavic atheistic core that views abortion as perfectly acceptable birth control.

    Get drunk, get an abortion and then get back to the clubs.

    The Communists created an atheistic hole within the cities that will never be repaired. They don't have gay parades but view abortion as part of being single.

    The bitter dwarf king could end abortion by decree but instead decided to attack his Orthodox neighbor.

    Ukraine not only has a higher percentage of Orthodox Christians but a much higher ratio that attend weekly service. Russia is filled with mafia type Orthodox that really just want fire insurance. Meaning they want to go to heaven after a life of sinning.

    Atheism continues to expand in Russia
    https://www.rbth.com/lifestyle/333670-more-and-more-russians-are-becoming-atheists

    Too bad that Nicholas 2 didn't have the balls to simply put a bullet in Lenin. Russia was never known for its moral values and then the Communists ramped up atheistic amorality.

    Replies: @Wokechoke

    Putin halved abortion rates.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @Wokechoke

    Romania, Finland, Latvia, Slovenia, Czechia, Japan, and Ukraine are at half of Russia's abortion rate:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_abortion_statistics

    Replies: @Wokechoke

  697. The greatest white hope and lone defender of christianity Putin is at it again, publicly declares Quran being sacred and for non-muslims in RF on a legal level and enforcement of it:

    DERBENT, June 28 – RIA Novosti. In Russia, disrespect for the Quran is a crime, unlike some other countries, and Russia will always adhere to these legislative rules, Russian President Vladimir Putin said.

    “This Muslim shrine is and should be the shrine for all others too. We know that in other countries they act differently. They do not respect the religious feelings of people, and they also say that this is not a crime. In our country, this is a crime – both according to the Constitution and according to Article 282 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. This is a crime, disrespect and incitement of interregional and interfaith hatred. And we will always adhere to these legislative rules,” Putin said during a visit to the Juma mosque in Derbent.

    https://ria.ru/20230628/koran-1880990447.html

    Reminder that roughly month ago Putin jailed a man who burned Koran in RF and sent him to prison in a muslim majority area.

    • Agree: Ivashka the fool
    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @sudden death

    Yeah, I mean, I don't think that books should be burned, even books which one might dislike, but I nevertheless do think that it should be legal, including for religious books. Thus, I think that it's sad that Putin is catering to Muslims on this issue. AFAIK, Russia was also against the Charlie Hebdo cartoons.

    Now, you might say, what's the point? It's just a bunch of stupid cartoons, right? But people also sometimes get killed and/or threatened for more serious debates, such as Theo van Gogh:

    https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assassination_of_Theo_van_Gogh

    You start threatening cartoonists, and later on you can start threatening anyone who engages in any kind of "Islamophobic" speech, even if they are trying to offer constructive criticism of Islamic doctrines.

    Also, as a side note, some white nationalists in the West, especially in the US, are converting to Russian Orthodoxy:

    https://www.npr.org/2022/05/10/1096741988/orthodox-christian-churches-are-drawing-in-far-right-american-converts

    This could pose a problem for the anti-racist longtime members of these churches in the long-run, especially if there will be too many of these new white nationalist converts in the Russian Orthodox Church and if they will actually start acquiring leadership positions there.

  698. @Wokechoke
    @John Johnson

    Putin halved abortion rates.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    Romania, Finland, Latvia, Slovenia, Czechia, Japan, and Ukraine are at half of Russia’s abortion rate:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_abortion_statistics

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @Mr. XYZ

    But it was on a downward trend to half of what it was in 1990.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

  699. @German_reader
    @Mr. XYZ


    The best argument for Ukraine retaking Crimea is that it’s internationally recognized Ukrainian territory
     
    Who gives a fuck, that wasn't relevant in Kosovo either. Ukraine forfeited its rights to Crimea and Eastern Donbass through its own policies, and if they had any sense they'd actually be glad to be rid of those regions with their pro-Russian minorities.

    Debates about the Crimean Khanate are quite irrelevant here.
     
    It's the Ukrainian side which brings up that history, because Islamophile anti-colonialism sells well in the current West (at least when it's not about Israel).
    Anyway, what was that word again...liberast? You really come across like the perfect embodiment. Would certainly be justified to send you to a homo concentration camp in Uganda. But on the other hand, you're such a weirdo you might actually enjoy being brutalized by big bad negroes. So I suppose the only option is to just scroll over your logorrheic comments.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Wokechoke, @Mikel

    So I suppose the only option is to just scroll over your logorrheic comments.

    Especially considering that he doesn’t seem to be subject to the posting restrictions that the rest of us are. Sadly, my prediction from a couple of weeks ago that the pervy alt-historian was going to bring this blog down is clearly materializing. I had never had to scroll past so many comments here in order to find something of interest. What I didn’t expect is that our former host would join his lgbt buddy in the final demise of his blog. But the world has definitely entered an accelerationist phase and it’s hard getting surprised at anything anymore. Btw, transitioning from the enthusiastic defense of a bloodbath without any recent precedent on European soil to advocating for child genital mutilation and all the rest of the crap that the “human elites” try to shove down our throats is not as unnatural as it might seem at first sight. If you’re capable of finding the former virtuous, why not the latter?

    • Replies: @sudden death
    @Mikel


    advocating for child genital mutilation
     
    There should be some secret cabal conspiracy of shitty plastic surgeons behind the scenes too - BigSurgeryTM;)

    On a more serious note, remembered watching on VHS several decades ago some shockumentary called Faces of Death or something like that and there was segment about transurgeries being done in 70's Thailand. So all this trans-fetish stuff probably originated in the East and then was transplanted into West? Or was it purely Western demand that made Bangkok full of paid trannies for hire even then?

    Replies: @Mikel

    , @Anatoly Karlin
    @Mikel

    (1) Mr. XYZ isn't my buddy.

    (2) I didn't express any position on gender-affirming treatments for minors. But that's OK, I don't expect much from r*ghtoid debate culture.

    Replies: @Mikel, @Mr. XYZ

  700. @sudden death
    The greatest white hope and lone defender of christianity Putin is at it again, publicly declares Quran being sacred and for non-muslims in RF on a legal level and enforcement of it:

    DERBENT, June 28 - RIA Novosti. In Russia, disrespect for the Quran is a crime, unlike some other countries, and Russia will always adhere to these legislative rules, Russian President Vladimir Putin said.

    "This Muslim shrine is and should be the shrine for all others too. We know that in other countries they act differently. They do not respect the religious feelings of people, and they also say that this is not a crime. In our country, this is a crime - both according to the Constitution and according to Article 282 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. This is a crime, disrespect and incitement of interregional and interfaith hatred. And we will always adhere to these legislative rules," Putin said during a visit to the Juma mosque in Derbent.

    https://ria.ru/20230628/koran-1880990447.html
     

    Reminder that roughly month ago Putin jailed a man who burned Koran in RF and sent him to prison in a muslim majority area.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    Yeah, I mean, I don’t think that books should be burned, even books which one might dislike, but I nevertheless do think that it should be legal, including for religious books. Thus, I think that it’s sad that Putin is catering to Muslims on this issue. AFAIK, Russia was also against the Charlie Hebdo cartoons.

    Now, you might say, what’s the point? It’s just a bunch of stupid cartoons, right? But people also sometimes get killed and/or threatened for more serious debates, such as Theo van Gogh:

    https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assassination_of_Theo_van_Gogh

    You start threatening cartoonists, and later on you can start threatening anyone who engages in any kind of “Islamophobic” speech, even if they are trying to offer constructive criticism of Islamic doctrines.

    Also, as a side note, some white nationalists in the West, especially in the US, are converting to Russian Orthodoxy:

    https://www.npr.org/2022/05/10/1096741988/orthodox-christian-churches-are-drawing-in-far-right-american-converts

    This could pose a problem for the anti-racist longtime members of these churches in the long-run, especially if there will be too many of these new white nationalist converts in the Russian Orthodox Church and if they will actually start acquiring leadership positions there.

  701. @keypusher
    @A123

    According to a recent Reuters/Ipsos polls, 81% of Democrats, 56% of Republicans and 57% of independents favor supplying U.S. weapons to Ukraine.

    It's a different poll, so maybe they're just phrasing the questions differently, but overall support for sending US weapons (65%) was much higher than it was when they asked the question in May (46%).

    https://www.reuters.com/world/most-americans-support-us-arming-ukraine-reutersipsos-2023-06-28/

    So Prigozhin's mutiny or whatever it was may have had an effect.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    Bless the Democrats for being so pro-Ukraine, pro-EU, and pro-West!

    The EU and West cannot be considered complete until Ukraine is a part of it!

  702. @YetAnotherAnon
    Here's the Insta of the journalist and "human rights" person who was eating 20 minutes before the place (in Kramatorsk) was hit. Note the US flag patch on the helmet of the soldier giving first aid in the video.

    https://www.instagram.com/p/CuAJb1iKLIG/

    Also note the comments.

    "Why the hell you posted the now deleted photo from the restaurant? Are you stupid to take and post pictures like that? Hope you will be kick out from Ukraine as soon as possible!"

    Anyone know what the deleted photo was?

    "just now the news came out that zelensky approved english as official. so in the video everyone immediately speaks english. ukraine is a progressive country"

    Ah, I see. A missile lands close by, causing devastation, and your first instinctive reactions are in a foreign language. Crap. In video from the frontline, Russian speaking Ukrainians under heavy fire speak in their mother tongue, as any of us would under great stress. I imagine most of the English speakers are native English speakers i.e. not Ukrainians.

    In this tweet the guy saying "there are soldiers under here" sounds South African to me, not British.

    https://twitter.com/ArthurM40330824/status/1674086499350900736

    "This is where we always ate our dinners" says US mercenary. Down thread a Ukrainian soldier says he was there, but with "other humanitarian aid volunteers ".

    https://twitter.com/MyLordBebo/status/1674069796470546433

    This looks conclusive, unless you believe (quite possible given propaganda levels) that Russia is trying to kill as many civilians as possible.

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2023/jun/28/russia-ukraine-war-live-kramatorsk-death-toll-rises-nato-to-strengthen-eastern-defences?page=with:block-649c1c418f08deda08fdd716#block-649c1c418f08deda08fdd716

    Ukrainian secret service arrests man it accuses of helping Russians carry out attack on Kramatorsk
    Ukraine’s counter-intelligence service says it has arrested “an agent of the Russian special services” who it accuses of helping Russia direct a missile strike that killed 10 people in the Ukrainian city of Kramatorsk.

    The Security Service of Ukraine (SSU) said the man lived in the city and was an employee at a local gas transportation company.

    Vasyl Malyuk, the head of the Security Service of Ukraine, said in a statement: “The agent of the Russian Federation will definitely answer to the Ukrainian court. But his detention is also a signal to all other adjusters and traitors who work for the enemy. Remember – the punishment is inevitable!”

    He added: “We constantly conduct legal work and continue to collect evidence for international courts.”

     

    I think "adjuster" is what we'd call a "spotter" - someone who identifies a target and calls in a strike on it.

    I tried posting some of this at Sailer's this morning, but his "at whim" policy means it's still awaiting approval after 8 hours. One can't help noticing that he leaps on stories that support the US line on Russia (2 posts in an hour on the chef's March On Moscow) while ignoring stuff that contradicts it. We all have our biases.

    Replies: @YetAnotherAnon, @YetAnotherAnon, @QCIC

    The deleted photo was I think of the guys pizza and Carlsberg meal, “20 minutes ago”, in which you can see two soldiers in the far background.

  703. @Anatoly Karlin
    @Mr. XYZ

    Correct, I absolutely am a Social Darwinist.

    https://twitter.com/RichardHanania/status/1665907732162174976

    Nation-states are going to zero. 🐻📉

    Consequently, I intend to front-run and accelerate that process. 💯


    Ukrainian nationalism actually attracts elite human capital...
     
    Ukrainian nationalism is attractive to EHC only to the extent its an underdog. The Azovites will rightly be kicked to the curb once they outlive their usefulness and it's time to get progressive.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Mr. XYZ, @AP

    What is EHC? I assume that the last two letters stand for “Human Capital?”

    • Replies: @Anatoly Karlin
    @AP

    Elite human capital.



    https://twitter.com/powerfultakes/status/1661064057959464965

    , @Yahya
    @AP


    What is EHC? I assume that the last two letters stand for “Human Capital?”
     
    EHC = Elite Human Capital
    , @Mr. XYZ
    @AP

    It stands for Elite Human Capital.

    As a side note, the Elite Human Capital that should probably be paid most attention to is the younger EHC that also wants to breed a lot. So, essentially younger versions of what Mitt Romney, Amy Coney Barrett, Ben Shapiro, Greg Cochran, et cetera would later become.

    The more virile particular members of EHC are, the more influence that they will have on future generations of EHC. There are, of course, environmentally-induced changes in opinion among EHC as well, so it's all a question of which influence is stronger. Public opinion has generally shifted leftwards over the years, decades, and centuries due to convincing arguments by the left, but will this continue being the case indefinitely in the future?

    Are the descendants of Mitt Romney, Amy Coney Barrett, Ben Shapiro, Greg Cochran, et cetera going to be bleeding-heart liberals? More liberal than their ancestors, Yes, very likely. But as liberal as the descendants of EHC members who are currently liberal? I'm rather skeptical.

    As a side note, as I told Anatoly Karlin, I'm skeptical that EHC has unequivocal power to shape public opinion. If it had, then there would actually be a serious movement to get rid of the natural-born citizen requirement for the US Presidency. But there isn't. Heck, EHC has failed to even get the Equal Rights Amendment *indisputably* ratified as a part of the US Constitution even after 50 years. EHC also probably mostly supported Roe v. Wade, but SCOTUS overruled it last year (though with pro-choicers winning abortion referendums on the state level afterwards). For that matter, since Russian EHC is more pro-West than Russians as a whole are, why have they failed to move the rest of the Russian population to their point of view? It is simply due to Putinist censorship and propaganda, or what?

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

  704. @Mikel
    @German_reader


    So I suppose the only option is to just scroll over your logorrheic comments.
     
    Especially considering that he doesn't seem to be subject to the posting restrictions that the rest of us are. Sadly, my prediction from a couple of weeks ago that the pervy alt-historian was going to bring this blog down is clearly materializing. I had never had to scroll past so many comments here in order to find something of interest. What I didn't expect is that our former host would join his lgbt buddy in the final demise of his blog. But the world has definitely entered an accelerationist phase and it's hard getting surprised at anything anymore. Btw, transitioning from the enthusiastic defense of a bloodbath without any recent precedent on European soil to advocating for child genital mutilation and all the rest of the crap that the "human elites" try to shove down our throats is not as unnatural as it might seem at first sight. If you're capable of finding the former virtuous, why not the latter?

    Replies: @sudden death, @Anatoly Karlin

    advocating for child genital mutilation

    There should be some secret cabal conspiracy of shitty plastic surgeons behind the scenes too – BigSurgeryTM;)

    On a more serious note, remembered watching on VHS several decades ago some shockumentary called Faces of Death or something like that and there was segment about transurgeries being done in 70’s Thailand. So all this trans-fetish stuff probably originated in the East and then was transplanted into West? Or was it purely Western demand that made Bangkok full of paid trannies for hire even then?

    • Replies: @Mikel
    @sudden death


    So all this trans-fetish stuff probably originated in the East and then was transplanted into West?
     
    No way. Transvestites and cross-dressers have always been part of the landscape in Western countries. I remember the times when the most adventurous ones traveled indeed to Thailand or Brazil to get their surgeries done and, quite frankly, the results were probably not as monstrous as what you see these days. What's new is the craze of the ever growing number of genders ("LGBTQ" is soo old-fashioned) and the normalization of the idea that half the children were born in the wrong bodies and will commit suicide if we don't put them on puberty blockers.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

  705. @Mr. XYZ
    @Wokechoke

    Romania, Finland, Latvia, Slovenia, Czechia, Japan, and Ukraine are at half of Russia's abortion rate:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_abortion_statistics

    Replies: @Wokechoke

    But it was on a downward trend to half of what it was in 1990.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @Wokechoke

    Certainly. But Russia was simply playing catch-up.

  706. @Mr. XYZ
    @Anatoly Karlin


    Ukrainian nationalism is attractive to EHC only to the extent its an underdog. The Azovites will rightly be kicked to the curb once they outlive their usefulness and it’s time to get progressive.
     
    Ukrainian nationalism isn't just Azov. What about all of those elite Ukrainian econ majors who volunteered for service in the Ukrainian military when Russia invaded, for instance? They're also Ukrainian nationalists. Some of them subsequently got killed, but many probably survived and will help build and maintain a more respectable Ukrainian nationalism in the post-war era.

    In fact, since EHC is dominant, Azov-style Ukrainian nationalism should become less prevalent over time and be replaced by the more respectable Ukrainian nationalism of elite Ukrainian econ majors, et cetera. This should also help Ukrainian EU aspirations by making Ukraine look more civilized, especially if over the next couple of decades Ukraine can also successfully reduce its corruption rate down to Polish levels (a difficult task, but not impossible)--which, in turn, would make Ukraine look not only civilized, but also clean, organized, and relatively honest as well, a huge plus for the EU as it still actively seeks new potential members.

    And there is also (Pan-)European nationalism. Some intellectuals have been attracted to it for decades. Some of the Hapsburgs, for instance, or Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi.

    Also, in regards to network states, some Germans have moved to Paraguay in recent years in response to Germany becoming too totalitarian (COVID vaccine mandates and lockdowns) and too diverse (Muslims):

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R-x46MkYr5Q

    But this hasn't become a mass movement yet and for network states to truly rival the big nation-states/nation-empires, network states would need populations in the hundreds of millions. Else, at best, they would simply become another Singapore or two or three or five or ten or twenty. Very nice and impressive places to live in, especially if they are of high human capital, and certainly nice political and social models for the rest of the world to take a look at, but also certainly nowhere near being actual world-powers.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @Mr. XYZ

    Kalergi was an Eurasian. Half Jap half German.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @Wokechoke

    Certainly, but the Hapsburgs were full-blooded Europeans, no?

  707. @Anatoly Karlin
    @Ivashka the fool

    Funnily enough I met a Serb nationalist in Belgrade who had come to very similar ideas about creating a "Cloud Serbia".

    Nations that have ended up historical losers are I think obviously more receptive to these ideas and it's logical that their nationalists in particular could be icebreakers for this vision.


    Although I am pretty sure that TPTB will crush such attempts.
     
    A plurality of the world's major polities (US/EU/China/India) would have to ban decentralized smart contract cryptocurrencies to kill this off, which is possible, but not likely ATM.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Ivashka the fool

    A plurality of the world’s major polities (US/EU/China/India) would have to ban decentralized smart contract cryptocurrencies to kill this off, which is possible, but not likely ATM.

    I am unfortunately pretty sure they will do exactly this once the CBDCs kick in. The future belongs to those who would be able to change their digital identifications ans create digital identities at will to access the flow of CBDCs in whatever situations.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antigenic_variation

    Unfortunately, I am too old to apply the implications of this simple insight, so I offer it to smartee and younger guys such as you are Anatoly and to your friends who will attempt at surviving the future digital panopticum and creating these networks in its very economical and informational flows.

    Find a way to become completely unrecognizable online and to create digital identifications at will. It will be useful and people would be ready to pay for it lot.

    • Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
    @Ivashka the fool

    They are going to make you identify yourself with a thumbprint or iris scan. The only way to stop them is unmentionable.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

    , @S
    @Ivashka the fool



    A plurality of the world’s major polities (US/EU/China/India) would have to ban decentralized smart contract cryptocurrencies to kill this off, which is possible, but not likely ATM.

     

    I am unfortunately pretty sure they will do exactly this once the CBDCs kick in. The future belongs to those who would be able to change their digital identifications ans create digital identities at will to access the flow of CBDCs in whatever situations...

    ...Find a way to become completely unrecognizable online and to create digital identifications at will. It will be useful and people would be ready to pay for it lot.
     
    There are, of course, people living 'off grid' now, but, I agree, they will likely go to great lengths to shut that sort of thing down. I could even see it perhaps being made into a capitol offense if a person is found living 'off grid' and/or, they are 'on-line', but with a false identity, and thus in reality free of the controls.

    They might alternately try a carrot and stick approach, where you could legally be off grid, but, with no right to take part in the economy, having to live like the 'Old Amish, ie a 19th century subsistance, which most won't agree too.

    We might in addition see large scale social crusades to get everyone 'on-line', and see the novel use of terms such as 'disharmonious' and 'unmutual', etc.

    Some might say that seems 'farfetched', yet we already have '1984'isms such as 'hate crime' and cameras all over the place watching and recording everything, which is no doubt only the tip of the iceberg.

    'Reactionary! Rebel! Disharmonious!'

    https://youtu.be/03OcBAbBank

    'They are socially conscious citizens and are provoked by the loathsome presence of an 'unmutual'!'

    https://youtu.be/Z1xa_poFVzg
  708. @AP
    @Anatoly Karlin

    What is EHC? I assume that the last two letters stand for "Human Capital?"

    Replies: @Anatoly Karlin, @Yahya, @Mr. XYZ

    Elite human capital.

    [MORE]

  709. @Anatoly Karlin
    @Mr. XYZ


    Maybe, but would the types who are particularly eager to do that be of particularly high human capital to begin with?
     
    Nationalist EHC will be first to defect from its own societies to recreate an "imagined past" of their culture in network states with "aligned" co-ideologists.

    https://twitter.com/powerfultakes/status/1617559733266776064

    (I do not claim to be EHC. I am merely an "object", a "thing", or a "whatever" that tries to observe and study EHC. However, I could certainly see myself holding an NFT denoting membership of a transhumanist-themed and a Tsarpunk-themed transnational network state; considering cosmism originated in the latter, they would not even be contradictory).

    In fact, this will arguably be a self-reinforcing process, to the extent that these dynamics suck away oxygen and EHC from nationalist/identitarian organizations rooted within and playing by the rules of the traditional nation-state. They are going to become even less prestigious than they are today.

    BTW, before your recent conversion, did you not view a super-powerful Russia (one that includes both Ukraine and Belarus) as a threat to network states?
     
    One of the bullish factors for network states is that many of the Great Powers are genuinely spiteful towards each other and will forge alliances of convenience with network states, proverbially selling us the rope with which we'll hang them. "Many such cases" historically.

    Regarding myself personally - I have never hid my contempt towards small nation nationalisms, which are parochial by definition.

    Alternate history scenarios aside, Russia has proven itself a "small" nation, its memes totally Americanized and ruinously so, continuing being a classic Russian nationalist at this point is only slightly less risible than being, say, a Polish or Romanian or even Ukrainian nationalist. I still retain my viewpoint that there is no reason for cultures that do not appear as playable factions in the Civilization games to exist. So for me this "transition" is both logical and at this point very psychologically easy.

    The only nationalisms that still make sense are American, Chinese, and perhaps Indian but they all come with their own thicket of issues. It's hard to reconcile with American multiculturalism and innately universalist characteristics (there's a reason why any true American nationalism defaults to White Nationalism which is both universal and transracial), with the Fourteen Principles of Xi Jinping Thought, with Indians basically being this melange of peoples who are as differentiated from each other as Europeans.

    French, German, etc. nationalism don't make any sense either at this point, despite their once formidable cultures. Visit London or Paris. All very bullish for network states.

    Replies: @songbird, @Mr. XYZ, @Ivashka the fool, @Mr. XYZ

    All very bullish for network states.

    Just call these network societies, forget about the state part.

  710. S says:
    @sudden death
    @silviosilver


    does immigration – more correctly, mass immigration – serve the existing population of the country being imminvaded
     
    Most probably today equivalents of George Washinton slave owner type super wealthy white people really do think so now as they thought then too - mass brown/black immigration really serves them and they have the means to immunise themselves from negative effects as current Brazil/Mexico wealthy elite has the means to immunise themselves from everyday violence in the streets while remaing rich&safe with their own bodyguards and high walls. Even if there is no lawful racism and white supremacy differently from Washington era in North America.

    Replies: @S, @silviosilver

    Most probably today equivalents of George Washinton slave owner type super wealthy white people really do think so now as they thought then too – mass brown/black immigration really serves them and they have the means to immunise themselves from negative effects as current Brazil/Mexico wealthy elite has the means to immunise themselves from everyday violence in the streets while remaing rich&safe with their own bodyguards and high walls.

    That’s a good way of looking at it.

    Due to the reality in the Anglosphere of chattel slavery and it’s trade having been monetized (as opposed to having been ‘abolished’) with the early 19th century introduction of wage slavery (ie specifically the so called ‘cheap labor’/’mass immigration’ system) we still have much the same horrid social template (though arguably much worse now) which existed in 1750 British North America in the present day United States.

    That template consisted of powerful elements amongst the elites and their hangers on not wishing to go to the time, trouble, sacrifice, and most notably, expense, to employ their own. To escape that social responsibility they had grown accustomed, by diktat, to importing alien chattel slave labor from Africa.

    This caused all sorts of social ills in society, ie depressed wages amongst the free non-slave population, unnecessary racial division with the (also by diktat) introduction of the ‘freed’ slaves into the larger society, the corruption in all sorts of ways of the slaving elites and their hangers on themselves.

    When in accordance to the tenet of Capitalism to maximize profits chattel slavery and it’s trade was monetized in the early 19th century with the introduction of wage slavery (ie so called ‘cheap labor’/’mass immigration’) under cover of a faux ‘abolition’, a veritable revolution in the slavery industry took place, ie every last negative that slave dealer, slave owner, and slave trade financier, had formally had to deal with had now been outsourced (ie dumped upon) the general non-exploiting public, the vast majority, to now deal with, while the former still profited handsomely (now without the hassles) of not having to pay their own the prevailing real time local rates for their labor.

    If I was one of these historic amoral/immoral slavers and their hangers on I would see this as one of the greatest of triumphs over my fellow man, and mankind as a whole, which had ever occurred in the history of the world. [The US Civil War, a war fought in reality by both ‘sides’ for slavery -the North’s wage slavery vs the South’s chattel slave system-, with it’s seven hundred thousand dead representing that many new empty slots to be potentially replaced by imported wage slaves (ie so called ‘cheap labor’) could be seen by these historic slaving elites as an added bonus.]

  711. @AP
    @Anatoly Karlin

    What is EHC? I assume that the last two letters stand for "Human Capital?"

    Replies: @Anatoly Karlin, @Yahya, @Mr. XYZ

    What is EHC? I assume that the last two letters stand for “Human Capital?”

    EHC = Elite Human Capital

  712. @Ivashka the fool
    @Anatoly Karlin


    A plurality of the world’s major polities (US/EU/China/India) would have to ban decentralized smart contract cryptocurrencies to kill this off, which is possible, but not likely ATM.
     
    I am unfortunately pretty sure they will do exactly this once the CBDCs kick in. The future belongs to those who would be able to change their digital identifications ans create digital identities at will to access the flow of CBDCs in whatever situations.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antigenic_variation

    Unfortunately, I am too old to apply the implications of this simple insight, so I offer it to smartee and younger guys such as you are Anatoly and to your friends who will attempt at surviving the future digital panopticum and creating these networks in its very economical and informational flows.

    Find a way to become completely unrecognizable online and to create digital identifications at will. It will be useful and people would be ready to pay for it lot.

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @S

    They are going to make you identify yourself with a thumbprint or iris scan. The only way to stop them is unmentionable.

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @Emil Nikola Richard

    Where there's will, there's way. They'll have to find it.

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard

  713. @Sean
    @Ivashka the fool

    Putin had a knack of working his way into the confidences of a series of increasingly big shots and being accepted as a dog- loyal protégé, his gangster martial arts coach in his youth Usvyatsov and his uni law professor Subchak. Then Boris Berezovsky. A lot of these people later suffered untimely demises, but Russian men tend hit the vodka very hard.


    Litvinenko was a lying bastard about having video of Putin being a paedo (supposedly in the same hotel room the Skuratov komproat tape of was filmed. )A GRU pervert I could believe but the KGB were an elite whose candidates personal lives got losely examined and they were required to have no hint of abnormal sexual inclination that could make them vulnerable to recruitment by Western intel. Putin married in 1983. Moreover, two years later he was assigned to East Germany which was not the most high flying duty yet still sought after station for the a KGB man. They would not have sent him there if there was anything.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

    I never wrote about Pynya being a perv. Although he was frolicking around while married, most probably he was the one who inseminated the BND agent “Balcony” Anchen that was close friends with Lyudmila and him. His son would be now a grown-up man in Germany. And I believe Zapol’skyi when he says that he saw a video of a man looking like Pynya giving a matchbox to a BND agent in a park in Dresden in 1989. It is not a well known fact, but Pynya was discharged from the KGB in 1990, and that was not because he left the CPSU as he claims. That’s why we was driving a taxi in Piter before being picked up by Sobchak. My hypothesis is that his German contacts in the BND helped getting him in the right place. Piter was the place to be at the time, the most active RF sea port for trade with Germany. Sobchak had a lot of foreign friends but he was not a practical man, he needed a more crafty individual capable of doing the dirty work.

    • Replies: @Sean
    @Ivashka the fool

    He doubtless denied himself nothing after attaining supreme power, but I am dubious about Putin mixing business with pleasure while he was a KGB agent, of even head of the FSB. When he was 17, so the story goes he went to the KGB building and asked how he could become one of them, and was advised to get a law degree. Supposedly the 'Sportsman' gangster/rapist/ martial arts coach helped getting him a place in University. But a lot of those Sobchak taught must have been aspiring KGB so he had some connections, and Putin got to be a Lt. Col. I think for Russia in those days Putin was a rare combination of someone considered reliable by the military industrial security complex and with knowledge of Germany plus he speaks German fluently. People had not enough to eat in St Petersburg then, and yet arms factory warehouses were full of valuable raw materials including precius metals. Putin was ideal to oversee the sale of raw materials for food, Sobchak was not a very practical man, and Putin must have done well because Sobchak recommended him to Yeltsin, for a job in bowels of the Kremlin managing the property department. . Putin is not impulsive, doesn't even drink; I think he got to rise through being am apparent natural underling-perceived as someone who would stay in his lane and be properly gratefully to his benefactors forever after.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

  714. @YetAnotherAnon
    Here's the Insta of the journalist and "human rights" person who was eating 20 minutes before the place (in Kramatorsk) was hit. Note the US flag patch on the helmet of the soldier giving first aid in the video.

    https://www.instagram.com/p/CuAJb1iKLIG/

    Also note the comments.

    "Why the hell you posted the now deleted photo from the restaurant? Are you stupid to take and post pictures like that? Hope you will be kick out from Ukraine as soon as possible!"

    Anyone know what the deleted photo was?

    "just now the news came out that zelensky approved english as official. so in the video everyone immediately speaks english. ukraine is a progressive country"

    Ah, I see. A missile lands close by, causing devastation, and your first instinctive reactions are in a foreign language. Crap. In video from the frontline, Russian speaking Ukrainians under heavy fire speak in their mother tongue, as any of us would under great stress. I imagine most of the English speakers are native English speakers i.e. not Ukrainians.

    In this tweet the guy saying "there are soldiers under here" sounds South African to me, not British.

    https://twitter.com/ArthurM40330824/status/1674086499350900736

    "This is where we always ate our dinners" says US mercenary. Down thread a Ukrainian soldier says he was there, but with "other humanitarian aid volunteers ".

    https://twitter.com/MyLordBebo/status/1674069796470546433

    This looks conclusive, unless you believe (quite possible given propaganda levels) that Russia is trying to kill as many civilians as possible.

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2023/jun/28/russia-ukraine-war-live-kramatorsk-death-toll-rises-nato-to-strengthen-eastern-defences?page=with:block-649c1c418f08deda08fdd716#block-649c1c418f08deda08fdd716

    Ukrainian secret service arrests man it accuses of helping Russians carry out attack on Kramatorsk
    Ukraine’s counter-intelligence service says it has arrested “an agent of the Russian special services” who it accuses of helping Russia direct a missile strike that killed 10 people in the Ukrainian city of Kramatorsk.

    The Security Service of Ukraine (SSU) said the man lived in the city and was an employee at a local gas transportation company.

    Vasyl Malyuk, the head of the Security Service of Ukraine, said in a statement: “The agent of the Russian Federation will definitely answer to the Ukrainian court. But his detention is also a signal to all other adjusters and traitors who work for the enemy. Remember – the punishment is inevitable!”

    He added: “We constantly conduct legal work and continue to collect evidence for international courts.”

     

    I think "adjuster" is what we'd call a "spotter" - someone who identifies a target and calls in a strike on it.

    I tried posting some of this at Sailer's this morning, but his "at whim" policy means it's still awaiting approval after 8 hours. One can't help noticing that he leaps on stories that support the US line on Russia (2 posts in an hour on the chef's March On Moscow) while ignoring stuff that contradicts it. We all have our biases.

    Replies: @YetAnotherAnon, @YetAnotherAnon, @QCIC

    How is it possible anyone is living a normal life 30 miles from Bakhmut?????

    I think if the heaviest artillery and hand-to-hand combat battle in 75 years goes on for months 30 miles away you are supposed to leave!

    Without looking, I don’t doubt that a Russian missile or two could have impacted there and I also don’t doubt it could be a Ukrainian false flag event.

    It doesn’t matter. War is hell. Ukraine needs to surrender while there are still some Ukrainians left.

  715. Greg Clark out with a new paper on the persistence of social status over time. Implies a strong genetic influence on social status (r = 0.57), though confounding variables would likely reduce the correlation if taken into account. Whether genetic effects or socio-cultural variables are responsible for this phenomenon is difficult to untangle, probably a mix of both though the magnitude is uncertain. At any rate, the persistence of social status is there, and correlates significantly with genetic proximity.

    Expect the results to be dismissed by the “what a man wishes” crowd.

    https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2300926120

    [MORE]

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @Yahya

    The closer people are genetically, the more similar their occupations are. Not surprising at all!

    Interestingly enough, even if one isn't genetically related to someone but still shares a lot of one's DNA with them (more than the usual amount between two strangers) by random chance, then it's entirely possible that one could have personality and/or behavior similarities with them, not just appearance similarities:

    https://www.cnn.com/2022/08/25/health/doppelganger-dna-study-wellness/index.html

    "Among those who had these genetic similarities, many also had similar weights, similar lifestyle factors, and similar behavioral traits like smoking and education levels. That could mean that genetic variation is related to physical appearance and also, potentially may influence some habits and behavior."

    But of course even identical twins are not fully identical, so ...

  716. @sudden death
    @Mikel


    advocating for child genital mutilation
     
    There should be some secret cabal conspiracy of shitty plastic surgeons behind the scenes too - BigSurgeryTM;)

    On a more serious note, remembered watching on VHS several decades ago some shockumentary called Faces of Death or something like that and there was segment about transurgeries being done in 70's Thailand. So all this trans-fetish stuff probably originated in the East and then was transplanted into West? Or was it purely Western demand that made Bangkok full of paid trannies for hire even then?

    Replies: @Mikel

    So all this trans-fetish stuff probably originated in the East and then was transplanted into West?

    No way. Transvestites and cross-dressers have always been part of the landscape in Western countries. I remember the times when the most adventurous ones traveled indeed to Thailand or Brazil to get their surgeries done and, quite frankly, the results were probably not as monstrous as what you see these days. What’s new is the craze of the ever growing number of genders (“LGBTQ” is soo old-fashioned) and the normalization of the idea that half the children were born in the wrong bodies and will commit suicide if we don’t put them on puberty blockers.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @Mikel

    Trans people have existed throughout history:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elagabalus

    "Dio says Elagabalus delighted in being called Hierocles's mistress, wife, and queen.[82] The emperor reportedly wore makeup and wigs, preferred to be called a lady and not a lord, and supposedly offered vast sums to any physician who could provide him with a vagina.[82][83] For this reason, the emperor is seen by some writers as an early transgender figure and one of the first on record as seeking sex reassignment surgery.[82][84][85] Such claims are especially common on the internet.[86]"

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John/Eleanor_Rykener

    As the record of Rykener's interrogation begins: "Johannes Rykener, se Elianorum nominans veste muliebri detectus", or "John Rykener, calling [himself] Eleanor, having been detected in woman's clothing".[1]

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

  717. Putin & Co moving quickly to asphyxiate PMC Wagner, as expected.

    Prigozhin should’ve read up on his Machiavelli.

    [MORE]

  718. @Mr. XYZ
    @Anatoly Karlin


    Nationalist EHC will be first to defect from its own societies to recreate an “imagined past” of their culture in network states with “aligned” co-ideologists.
     
    Didn't you previously say that there isn't all that much nationalist EHC to begin with, at least relatively speaking, though?

    https://www.unz.com/akarlin/the-rights-human-capital-problem/

    The EHC that they do have could potentially be attracted by network states, but still, would one prefer to be a big fish in a small pond or a small fish in a big pond? Right now, right-wing EHC such as Rod Dreher can move to places like Hungary (or Poland, I guess) while still remaining within the world-empire known as the EU.

    One of the bullish factors for network states is that many of the Great Powers are genuinely spiteful towards each other and will forge alliances of convenience with network states, proverbially selling us the rope with which we’ll hang them. “Many such cases” historically.
     
    By that logic, though, why aim to destroy nation-states? Simply to weaken them?

    Regarding myself personally – I have never hid my contempt towards small nation nationalisms, which are parochial by definition.

    Alternate history scenarios aside, Russia has proven itself a “small” nation, its memes totally Americanized and ruinously so, continuing being a classic Russian nationalist at this point is only slightly less risible than being, say, a Polish or Romanian or even Ukrainian nationalist.
     
    Ukrainian nationalism actually attracts elite human capital, both at home and abroad, so in this regard it's considerably different from these other nationalisms, even from Russian nationalism. In a world where EHC will be dominant, Ukrainian nationalism will survive and even thrive, most likely. Don't worry about that.

    I also wouldn't call either Poland or Ukraine (or even Finland) joke countries since all of them have managed to hold their own against Russia in a major war (1919-1921, 1939-1940, 2022-present).

    I still retain my viewpoint that there is no reason for cultures that do not appear as playable factions in the Civilization games to exist. So for me this “transition” is both logical and at this point very psychologically easy.
     
    You think and sound like a Social Darwinist. In 1900, there was widespread logic that countries that were insufficiently accomplished don't deserve to have/keep their independence. Maybe we should return to colonialism for the unaccomplished countries, since their independence doesn't mean much anyway?

    I could just as easily have said before the current Ukrainian war that Russia does not deserve to exist as its own civilizational space (and that thus Russia should let the EU have Ukraine unopposed) because Russia (unlike the EU) produces nowhere near enough elite science production or R & D spending to qualify as its own civilizational space, something that would not have been meaningfully changed by Russia conquering and annexing Ukraine and Belarus.

    The only nationalisms that still make sense are American, Chinese, and perhaps Indian but they all come with their own thicket of issues.
     
    Why not European nationalism as well? The EU has more people than the US has, likely a larger smart fraction than India has, and a comparable average IQ to the US (though very possibly a smaller smart fraction).

    If you have previously argued that 200 million people was enough for Russia to become its own civilizational space (which I'm inclined to disagree with), then why is 500+ million people not enough for the EU to likewise become its own civilizational space, at least if it will actually have the desire to do this? The EU can be a separate "junior" civilizational pole in the West besides the more "senior" US/Anglosphere. (Junior and senior in terms of their prestige, not their age.)

    It’s hard to reconcile with American multiculturalism and innately universalist characteristics (there’s a reason why any true American nationalism defaults to White Nationalism which is both universal and transracial),
     
    It's very easy to have a big-tent American nationalism, no? Similar for other Anglosphere nationalisms, especially in Anglosphere settler colonies such as Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, no? One can admire white people for largely building the US but still embrace others who want to be American if they're culturally compatible, can successfully assimilate and contribute, et cetera.

    with the Fourteen Principles of Xi Jinping Thought,
     
    How's that incompatible with Chinese nationalism?

    with Indians basically being this melange of peoples who are as differentiated from each other as Europeans.
     
    Indians have a largely common Hindu identity to unite them, just like Europeans have a largely common historical Christian identity to unite them, not to mention the general achievements and accomplishments of Western civilization.

    French, German, etc. nationalism don’t make any sense either at this point, despite their once formidable cultures. Visit London or Paris. All very bullish for network states.

     

    Those nationalisms, perhaps not, but European nationalism appears to be quite popular and successful, no?

    BTW, if small state nationalism should be rejected, then this should also apply to Israeli Jewish nationalism, right? Israel does not have anywhere near large enough economies of scale to become a global power, after all.

    Replies: @Anatoly Karlin, @QCIC

    Speaking of Israel,

    The upper tier of World Judaism has long been the example of your stateless, EHC, “cloud community”.

    If you want to do it, learn from them. Do not expect to outsmart them with blockchain or any other widespread tech, they have been doing this for a very long time and are very adaptive. You may find that when you look at the nasty underbelly of how they can pull this off a different approach starts to look better.

    Having said that, I think some version of the stateless society in LEO, on the moon and in the asteroids is a worthy vision despite how barren these places are. Maybe that is a feature. This rock we are on may be lost.

    Sorry if you already covered this.

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @QCIC


    Having said that, I think some version of the stateless society in LEO, on the moon and in the asteroids is a worthy vision despite how barren these places are. Maybe that is a feature. This rock we are on may be lost.
     
    I think one of the reasons for this race towards digital control and total awareness IOT panopticum, is they need to implement this before we follow in the footsteps of the American character in the end paragraphs of Gibson & Sterling's "Red Star winter orbit" story.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Star,_Winter_Orbit

    Once we've crawled out of the jar, there would be no way to bring us back in. Some people cannot tolerate freedom. Just imagine all these hoi polloi polluting the Asteroid Belt with heir smelly GHGs.

    Which makes me think that it is unfortunate that the pioneering spirit of the nineteenth and twentieth century Americans seems gone for good.

    Hélas, tout passe, tout casse, le joint et le cul lassent...

    (Excuse my French)

    🙂

  719. @Mikel
    @German_reader


    So I suppose the only option is to just scroll over your logorrheic comments.
     
    Especially considering that he doesn't seem to be subject to the posting restrictions that the rest of us are. Sadly, my prediction from a couple of weeks ago that the pervy alt-historian was going to bring this blog down is clearly materializing. I had never had to scroll past so many comments here in order to find something of interest. What I didn't expect is that our former host would join his lgbt buddy in the final demise of his blog. But the world has definitely entered an accelerationist phase and it's hard getting surprised at anything anymore. Btw, transitioning from the enthusiastic defense of a bloodbath without any recent precedent on European soil to advocating for child genital mutilation and all the rest of the crap that the "human elites" try to shove down our throats is not as unnatural as it might seem at first sight. If you're capable of finding the former virtuous, why not the latter?

    Replies: @sudden death, @Anatoly Karlin

    (1) Mr. XYZ isn’t my buddy.

    (2) I didn’t express any position on gender-affirming treatments for minors. But that’s OK, I don’t expect much from r*ghtoid debate culture.

    • Replies: @Mikel
    @Anatoly Karlin

    Whether you've made up your mind on the issue of putting children under "gender-affirmation" surgery or not is quite immaterial. If you haven't, you're still not fully onboard with the Elites' thinking but it's up to you to decide how far you're willing to let the SMO fiasco make you descend.

    What is more concerning is that you're latching on to the xyz nutter to make a return here and thus collaborating to the irreversible destruction of your own creation. If you still find it worth your time to comment here, I'd rather you engaged your former protégé Gerard, who you threatened to make moderator of this blog as a punishment for most commenters being against Putin's invasion. At least he's funny and it would be entertaining to see you both exchange impressions on the course of the war 1.5 years later lol

    Replies: @Anatoly Karlin

    , @Mr. XYZ
    @Anatoly Karlin

    Is AP your buddy? What about German_reader? Or Razib Khan? Or any of the other commenters on here?

    As a side note, re: EHC: One could adopt a principle that EHC is presumptively right on a particular issue unless there is good evidence to the contrary. For HBD, such evidence exists (as well as your article on the false dichotomy between race denial and racism, which is an argument that can be embraced even from a liberal/social justice POV). For totally open borders, some such evidence exists (the failure of colonized peoples to permanently accept being an inferior caste in a hereditary caste system (which applies to Bryan Caplan's idea that we should have open borders but also a multi-generational denial of voting rights and social safety net access for immigrants and their descendants), as well as the failure to achieve full integration with certain groups in the West). (I do think that the evidence is more solid in favor of supporting much greater immigration liberalization, just not to fully open borders levels for the West.) For anti-natalism, such evidence exists because EHC anti-natalists are evolutionarily being selected against and because natalism, if done eugenically, can be a huge boost to society. But on the other stuff, EHC does strike me as being more likely to have reason relative to the proles. EHC is more pro-free speech relative to the proles, for instance.

    The issue with conquering unwilling peoples for their human capital would have, I would have thought, been more widely supported by EHC had this idea been more widely practiced in recent times. Yet countries generally frown on such a practice. For instance, the US could have conquered Canada, Australia, and New Zealand during WWI by allying with the Central Powers instead of the Entente (pre-USW) but chose not to do this because it didn't see a need for this. Likewise, even Nazi-era Germans (at least pre-Fall of France) would have probably balked at the idea of forcibly incorporating the Netherlands into Germany even though the Dutch and the Deutsch originated as one people. (Austria was a different case because Austrians themselves wanted such a union back in 1919; ditto for the Sudeten Germans.) If greater economies of scale were that vital, why wouldn't Japan and South Korea have put their past grievances behind them and have agreed to form a confederation between the two of them? This is what my general issue with pro-war Russian logic was about how Russia needs additional human capital and all of that. You want it? Then go and do what Israelis are doing! Else, just accept your status as a regional power benefitting you and instead seek to join the EU.

    Makes one wonder if EHC is also correct in general about Putin killing his critics even if they might be wrong about specific cases. If Israel was led by an authoritarian leader who was a former Mossad agent, and his critics ended up getting killed or dying in mysterious circumstances one by one, I'd also be very wary of him.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Anatoly Karlin

  720. @Wokechoke
    @Mr. XYZ

    Kalergi was an Eurasian. Half Jap half German.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    Certainly, but the Hapsburgs were full-blooded Europeans, no?

  721. @Wokechoke
    @Mr. XYZ

    But it was on a downward trend to half of what it was in 1990.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    Certainly. But Russia was simply playing catch-up.

  722. @Emil Nikola Richard
    @Ivashka the fool

    They are going to make you identify yourself with a thumbprint or iris scan. The only way to stop them is unmentionable.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

    Where there’s will, there’s way. They’ll have to find it.

    • Agree: S
    • Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
    @Ivashka the fool

    That is a minimum content cliche.

    This is short but dense.

    https://roundingtheearth.substack.com/p/the-monetary-wars-part-iii

  723. @Mikel
    @sudden death


    So all this trans-fetish stuff probably originated in the East and then was transplanted into West?
     
    No way. Transvestites and cross-dressers have always been part of the landscape in Western countries. I remember the times when the most adventurous ones traveled indeed to Thailand or Brazil to get their surgeries done and, quite frankly, the results were probably not as monstrous as what you see these days. What's new is the craze of the ever growing number of genders ("LGBTQ" is soo old-fashioned) and the normalization of the idea that half the children were born in the wrong bodies and will commit suicide if we don't put them on puberty blockers.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    Trans people have existed throughout history:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elagabalus

    “Dio says Elagabalus delighted in being called Hierocles’s mistress, wife, and queen.[82] The emperor reportedly wore makeup and wigs, preferred to be called a lady and not a lord, and supposedly offered vast sums to any physician who could provide him with a vagina.[82][83] For this reason, the emperor is seen by some writers as an early transgender figure and one of the first on record as seeking sex reassignment surgery.[82][84][85] Such claims are especially common on the internet.[86]”

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John/Eleanor_Rykener

    As the record of Rykener’s interrogation begins: “Johannes Rykener, se Elianorum nominans veste muliebri detectus”, or “John Rykener, calling [himself] Eleanor, having been detected in woman’s clothing”.[1]

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @Mr. XYZ

    You remember how it ended for Ileh ha gabal ? BTW the Punic culture was quite perv and when the Romans beat the crap out of them, those who survived massively converted to Judaism or posed as Syriac.

  724. @Mr. XYZ
    @Mikel

    Trans people have existed throughout history:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elagabalus

    "Dio says Elagabalus delighted in being called Hierocles's mistress, wife, and queen.[82] The emperor reportedly wore makeup and wigs, preferred to be called a lady and not a lord, and supposedly offered vast sums to any physician who could provide him with a vagina.[82][83] For this reason, the emperor is seen by some writers as an early transgender figure and one of the first on record as seeking sex reassignment surgery.[82][84][85] Such claims are especially common on the internet.[86]"

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John/Eleanor_Rykener

    As the record of Rykener's interrogation begins: "Johannes Rykener, se Elianorum nominans veste muliebri detectus", or "John Rykener, calling [himself] Eleanor, having been detected in woman's clothing".[1]

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

    You remember how it ended for Ileh ha gabal ? BTW the Punic culture was quite perv and when the Romans beat the crap out of them, those who survived massively converted to Judaism or posed as Syriac.

  725. @Mr. Hack
    @songbird

    For real? Their youngest sibling, their little brother must be Little Nikita. :-)

    Replies: @songbird

    Have always enjoyed the stereotype of the fiery red-haired woman, but I, regret to say, have never observed it IRL.

    [MORE]

    Don’t know if it is universal, but it even seems to appeal to the Japanese.

    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @songbird

    How many Irish do you suppose are actually redheads? I've certainly met a few such examples (including a Ukrainian/Irish mix). Here's a photo of a beautiful Ukrainian redhead, of which there are more than a few examples:

    https://i.imgur.com/Em8C83h.jpg
    Alina Kovalenko.

    Replies: @Coconuts, @Greasy William, @songbird, @Mr. XYZ

  726. S says:
    @Ivashka the fool
    @Anatoly Karlin


    A plurality of the world’s major polities (US/EU/China/India) would have to ban decentralized smart contract cryptocurrencies to kill this off, which is possible, but not likely ATM.
     
    I am unfortunately pretty sure they will do exactly this once the CBDCs kick in. The future belongs to those who would be able to change their digital identifications ans create digital identities at will to access the flow of CBDCs in whatever situations.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antigenic_variation

    Unfortunately, I am too old to apply the implications of this simple insight, so I offer it to smartee and younger guys such as you are Anatoly and to your friends who will attempt at surviving the future digital panopticum and creating these networks in its very economical and informational flows.

    Find a way to become completely unrecognizable online and to create digital identifications at will. It will be useful and people would be ready to pay for it lot.

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @S

    A plurality of the world’s major polities (US/EU/China/India) would have to ban decentralized smart contract cryptocurrencies to kill this off, which is possible, but not likely ATM.

    I am unfortunately pretty sure they will do exactly this once the CBDCs kick in. The future belongs to those who would be able to change their digital identifications ans create digital identities at will to access the flow of CBDCs in whatever situations…

    …Find a way to become completely unrecognizable online and to create digital identifications at will. It will be useful and people would be ready to pay for it lot.

    There are, of course, people living ‘off grid’ now, but, I agree, they will likely go to great lengths to shut that sort of thing down. I could even see it perhaps being made into a capitol offense if a person is found living ‘off grid’ and/or, they are ‘on-line’, but with a false identity, and thus in reality free of the controls.

    They might alternately try a carrot and stick approach, where you could legally be off grid, but, with no right to take part in the economy, having to live like the ‘Old Amish, ie a 19th century subsistance, which most won’t agree too.

    We might in addition see large scale social crusades to get everyone ‘on-line’, and see the novel use of terms such as ‘disharmonious’ and ‘unmutual’, etc.

    Some might say that seems ‘farfetched’, yet we already have ‘1984’isms such as ‘hate crime’ and cameras all over the place watching and recording everything, which is no doubt only the tip of the iceberg.

    ‘Reactionary! Rebel! Disharmonious!’

    ‘They are socially conscious citizens and are provoked by the loathsome presence of an ‘unmutual’!’

  727. @LatW
    @Coconuts


    I thought it meant the ruling elite.
     
    EHC will often be the elite, but is the elite always EHC? I was wondering if these network states will only contain EHC, and then how is that defined (and even more importantly, maintained).

    Elite circulation is a constant thing though, so the composition of the elite will change over time.
     

    It's always been the case, especially now, but there have always been academic networks and executives often operate internationally anyway.

    So in a way, one can say that these large globalized companies are already like networks, maybe they are not states, but they do often have their own culture, own goals (not just business goals, but also social impact related which they themselves decide on). It's only a matter where this becomes "political" and also how the ownership part is handled (taxes, properties).

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

    It’s only a matter where this becomes “political” and also how the ownership part is handled (taxes, properties).

    https://www.undp.org/sgtechcentre/smart-cities-1

    https://www.un.org/en/un-chronicle/blockchain-and-sustainable-growth

    https://www.un.org/development/desa/dpad/publication/world-economic-situation-and-prospects-august-2022-briefing-no-163/

    The answer is wherever, taken at the source.

    • Replies: @LatW
    @Ivashka the fool


    Re: Smart cities, digital currency, etc.
     
    Sure, these things are being laid out in these policy documents but I was actually wondering about it from the other side, not the side of how network states would be built (the EHC would easily figure out these practical details), I was wondering more about how the EHC who will be inclined to leave the nation-state (or the multi-culti state), how they would extricate themselves from that state - usually such things happen either through some kind of a consensus or through violent means. Obligations to the state (taxes owed, military service, all kinds of other administrative obligations) follow one where ever one goes in the world. I guess I'm just wondering about that moment when the EHC decide to bail, how exactly they will tell their original state to take a hike?

    There is some old school American right wing anarchist and libertarian literature out there on these topics (from the 1990s), but it's always been viewed as "utopian".

    Oh, and, btw, I wouldn't put too much weight on the UN these days. Many of these large, old school orgs didn't show themselves in a very flattering light during the dramatic events and humanitarian crises that have just transpired. So I wouldn't expect them to be all that capable in carrying out their countless plans. Smart cities, etc., will mostly be done by private individuals, in collaboration with the local governments, not these UN type orgs.

    Btw, thanks for the giraffe heart video - very instructive. Not always easy to live by that in our dynamic age. I guess we should've all followed that after 1991.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

  728. @Anatoly Karlin
    @Mikel

    (1) Mr. XYZ isn't my buddy.

    (2) I didn't express any position on gender-affirming treatments for minors. But that's OK, I don't expect much from r*ghtoid debate culture.

    Replies: @Mikel, @Mr. XYZ

    Whether you’ve made up your mind on the issue of putting children under “gender-affirmation” surgery or not is quite immaterial. If you haven’t, you’re still not fully onboard with the Elites’ thinking but it’s up to you to decide how far you’re willing to let the SMO fiasco make you descend.

    What is more concerning is that you’re latching on to the xyz nutter to make a return here and thus collaborating to the irreversible destruction of your own creation. If you still find it worth your time to comment here, I’d rather you engaged your former protégé Gerard, who you threatened to make moderator of this blog as a punishment for most commenters being against Putin’s invasion. At least he’s funny and it would be entertaining to see you both exchange impressions on the course of the war 1.5 years later lol

    • Replies: @Anatoly Karlin
    @Mikel

    It's just an unreflective r*ghtoid (but I repeat myself) take. Progressive high EHC countries like Sweden, Norway, Finland have pedaled back on child sex transition. It's highly dubious it will ever enjoy widespread acceptance.

    Child sex transition isn't a particularly appealing asset to invest in for an object that is thinking about how to front-run EHC. There are many much better bets, such as transhumanism, vegetarianism (anti-killing higher animals more specifically), women being socially pressured to adopt husband's surname, etc. are some examples.

    I addressed a point by AP before XYZ engaged me.

    I couldn't care less about this blog's ruins. It should have been put out of its misery long ago, if XYZ accelerates the process, more power to it.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Ivashka the fool, @Mr. XYZ, @Mikel, @AP, @A123

  729. @Yahya
    Greg Clark out with a new paper on the persistence of social status over time. Implies a strong genetic influence on social status (r = 0.57), though confounding variables would likely reduce the correlation if taken into account. Whether genetic effects or socio-cultural variables are responsible for this phenomenon is difficult to untangle, probably a mix of both though the magnitude is uncertain. At any rate, the persistence of social status is there, and correlates significantly with genetic proximity.

    Expect the results to be dismissed by the “what a man wishes” crowd.

    https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2300926120

    https://twitter.com/alextisyoung/status/1673430473132097536?s=61&t=4nX6Z_wpQfsu6CmqDCXHZA

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    The closer people are genetically, the more similar their occupations are. Not surprising at all!

    Interestingly enough, even if one isn’t genetically related to someone but still shares a lot of one’s DNA with them (more than the usual amount between two strangers) by random chance, then it’s entirely possible that one could have personality and/or behavior similarities with them, not just appearance similarities:

    https://www.cnn.com/2022/08/25/health/doppelganger-dna-study-wellness/index.html

    “Among those who had these genetic similarities, many also had similar weights, similar lifestyle factors, and similar behavioral traits like smoking and education levels. That could mean that genetic variation is related to physical appearance and also, potentially may influence some habits and behavior.”

    But of course even identical twins are not fully identical, so …

  730. @Mikel
    @Anatoly Karlin

    Whether you've made up your mind on the issue of putting children under "gender-affirmation" surgery or not is quite immaterial. If you haven't, you're still not fully onboard with the Elites' thinking but it's up to you to decide how far you're willing to let the SMO fiasco make you descend.

    What is more concerning is that you're latching on to the xyz nutter to make a return here and thus collaborating to the irreversible destruction of your own creation. If you still find it worth your time to comment here, I'd rather you engaged your former protégé Gerard, who you threatened to make moderator of this blog as a punishment for most commenters being against Putin's invasion. At least he's funny and it would be entertaining to see you both exchange impressions on the course of the war 1.5 years later lol

    Replies: @Anatoly Karlin

    It’s just an unreflective r*ghtoid (but I repeat myself) take. Progressive high EHC countries like Sweden, Norway, Finland have pedaled back on child sex transition. It’s highly dubious it will ever enjoy widespread acceptance.

    Child sex transition isn’t a particularly appealing asset to invest in for an object that is thinking about how to front-run EHC. There are many much better bets, such as transhumanism, vegetarianism (anti-killing higher animals more specifically), women being socially pressured to adopt husband’s surname, etc. are some examples.

    I addressed a point by AP before XYZ engaged me.

    I couldn’t care less about this blog’s ruins. It should have been put out of its misery long ago, if XYZ accelerates the process, more power to it.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @Anatoly Karlin


    (anti-killing higher animals more specifically)
     
    What about making the killing proportional to mental ability? So, killing one pig for every 100 chickens? Would that work?

    Also, what about giving unwilling parents (especially, but not only, unwilling *male* parents) a *unilateral* opt-out from paying child support?:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paper_abortion

    Right now, women who never want to risk being forced to pay child support and who live in a place where abortion is legal can simply take a pregnancy test every month and then get an abortion if they are pregnant. But for men, the options are either abstinence from all penis-in-vagina sex with all fertile and potentially fertile cisgender women for their entire lives or getting surgically castrated, since even vasectomies and bilateral epididymectomies can fail, even when they are combined. For instance, here's an article about the latter failing (but not for humans):

    https://scienceon.kisti.re.kr/srch/selectPORSrchArticle.do?cn=NART95809445

    Child support insurance would be great, but it doesn't actually exist, would be unaffordable for those who aren't rich even if it did exist (as specialty insurance generally is), and could potentially be null, void, and unenforceable on public policy grounds, such as if judges think that the existence of such insurance makes non-custodial parents more likely to abandon their children.

    As for trans rights specifically, they are moving in quite a positive direction. In regards to child transition specifically, Bioliberalism on Twitter proposed a compromise where children would do brain scans and the ones who are likely to have trans brains would be allowed to begin transitioning in childhood, including with hormone blockers and whatnot. (Trans people sometimes, if not often, have unique brains.) The other trans kids can socially transition in childhood but wait until adulthood to physically transition. It might be unfair to them, but it would reduce the risk of false trans positives and thus of subsequent transition regret later on (and if you regret your transition, there aren't really any super-good options for you; we don't have the tech to grow new genuine breasts or a genuine new ding-dong for you in such a scenario).

    BTW, re: Elite human capital: What do you make of Peter Singer's (certainly elite human capital) support for (presumably painless) infanticide for disabled human infants, such as those with Down's syndrome, up to one month after their birth?

    , @Ivashka the fool
    @Anatoly Karlin


    I couldn’t care less about this blog’s ruins. It should have been put out of its misery long ago, if XYZ accelerates the process, more power to it.

     

    You're such an extremist... 🙂

    Tell me please, what do you think (if anything at all) about Dyumin?

    What are his chances to become the next president of the RF ?

    Replies: @silviosilver, @AP

    , @Mr. XYZ
    @Anatoly Karlin

    Back to the topic of network states:

    I think that, especially with the benefit of hindsight, Russia would have been better served creating a network state for Western dissident researchers. As in, not get involved in Ukraine in either 2014 or 2022, open its borders with Ukraine, Belarus, and Kazakhstan wide open, and use the money that it would have spent on Ukraine (including on Crimea) on building the framework for a network state for Western dissident researchers. The kind of Westerners who are willing to research interesting stuff but who lack funding for it from conventional sources such as universities: Emil Kirkegaard, John Fuerst, et cetera. There was some potential in achieving greater progress in that department had Russia been willing to financially commit to this project instead of obsessing over the need to regather "its lost people". Western dissident researchers don't have all that much funding, especially after Greg Cochran essentially ripped off Ron Unz (which was clever of Cochran and a useful personal reward for him being an intelligent pro-natalist and having five smart children of his own, but still highly detrimental to his overall cause since it made Unz much less willing to invest in future dissident research).

    Ultimately I guess that this further shows the bankruptcy of Russian nationalism: Instead of thinking bigger and trying to appeal to talented Westerners who are dissatisfied with the existing Western order, Russia essentially adopted a strategy similar to that of pre-Holocaust Germany, along with appealing to the lowest common denominator in the West with its talk about Satanism and the like. "Putin boomer" should become a total meme lol!

    As a side note, Yegor Prosvirnin's tragic death and especially its sad and brutal manner could retroactively be viewed as an omen of sorts for the fate and future of Russian nationalism in general. I also disagree with you that Western rightoids should have supported Russia over Ukraine in the current war because a stronger Russia would not have prevented Woke Western liberals from cancelling Western rightoids later on, just like a much stronger Soviet Union did not prevent Western anti-Communists from cancelling those Western liberals who were deemed sympathetic to Communism, at least for a while. And a stronger Russia would not have even been an attractive civilizational model anyway because it's not a huge center of human progress or human achievement nowadays like either the West or East Asia are. If Western rightoids want to spite the Wokes, a much more effective strategy would be to attach themselves to China, which is a paragon of human achievement in comparison to Russia. But some/many of them might be too Sinophobic for this. Which is good for the West, including its Wokes, unfortunately.

    BTW, in several decades' time, we shall check and see if any network states are among the world's biggest elite science producers and/or R & D spenders. That would be a major long-term test of their viability and ability to shape the world. For a network state to be really respectable in the R & D spending department right now, for instance, it would probably need to spend about the entirety of Elon Musk's total net worth on R & D every single year. This would require huge funding for these network states. Crowdfunding?

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

    , @Mikel
    @Anatoly Karlin


    I couldn’t care less about this blog’s ruins. It should have been put out of its misery long ago,
     
    Considering it's part of the ruins of the Unz horrorshow and it functions without moderation, it's not so bad really. There are still some good brains left, though you've just put off two of the best. But it's funny how you've let Putin change your mind even on that issue. A year ago this blog should have disappeared because people here weren't rightist enough to appreciate the value of the triune project and now it should disappear because we're just a bunch of old fashioned "rightoids".

    I'm not really much of a rightist or nationalist myself but I'll take an advanced, functional nation state (say Reagan's US) over those ethereal network state projects any time of the day. Zuzalu is part of NATO, btw. If any of those elite humans (some of them clear freaks) that like gathering there ever dream of changing that status Stoltenberg will make sure to remind them who's the real elite. Reminds me of a guy who bought a small piece of the Great Salt Desert for $5,000 on ebay, went to live there and declared it an independent republic. You could go visit him through a dirt road and he would stamp your passport with the emblem of his republic. No authority ever bothered him. Why would they? Perhaps he even attracted some needed tourism to the nearby sleepy towns.

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard

    , @AP
    @Anatoly Karlin


    Progressive high EHC countries like Sweden, Norway, Finland have pedaled back on child sex transition. It’s highly dubious it will ever enjoy widespread acceptance.
     
    Child sex transition seems to be the modern bizarre product of American Puritans, who are the native USA's EHC. Because of American soft power it was adopted elsewhere briefly but the other countries are indeed backing away from it. The Puritans will too, eventually.

    Replies: @Anatoly Karlin

    , @A123
    @Anatoly Karlin

    Backing Kiev aggression is a core value of Leftoid extremism.

    Fortunately there is one candidate who openly opposes the SJW's: (1)


    Watch: Trump Vows To “Sign A Law Prohibiting Child Sexual Mutilation In All 50 States”

     

    Addressing the Faith & Freedom Coalition convention in Georgia on Saturday, President Trump promised to sign a law if he is re-elected that would ban transgender surgeries on children.
    “Something else I find hard to believe that I have to even say,” Trump told the crowd, adding “It’s so ridiculous. It’s so horrible and so ridiculous. I will keep men out of women’s sports. And I will sign a law prohibiting child sexual mutilation in all 50 states. Prohibited.”

    Trump continued, “and on day one I will reinstate the Trump ban on transgenders in the military. Because a warrior should be focused on crushing American enemies, on being strong, on having the image of being strong.”

    “They have to be powerful. They have to be strong, especially when you see what’s happening in the world today, not catering to radical gender ideology,” he continued.

    https://rumble.com/embed/v2tmjhk/

     

    Yet another solid reason for Americans to support Trump.

    #LetsGoBrandon 😇
    _____________________________

    (1) https://www.zerohedge.com/political/watch-trump-vows-sign-law-prohibiting-child-sexual-mutilation-all-50-states

    Replies: @sudden death

  731. @QCIC
    @Mr. XYZ

    Speaking of Israel,

    The upper tier of World Judaism has long been the example of your stateless, EHC, "cloud community".

    If you want to do it, learn from them. Do not expect to outsmart them with blockchain or any other widespread tech, they have been doing this for a very long time and are very adaptive. You may find that when you look at the nasty underbelly of how they can pull this off a different approach starts to look better.

    Having said that, I think some version of the stateless society in LEO, on the moon and in the asteroids is a worthy vision despite how barren these places are. Maybe that is a feature. This rock we are on may be lost.

    Sorry if you already covered this.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

    Having said that, I think some version of the stateless society in LEO, on the moon and in the asteroids is a worthy vision despite how barren these places are. Maybe that is a feature. This rock we are on may be lost.

    I think one of the reasons for this race towards digital control and total awareness IOT panopticum, is they need to implement this before we follow in the footsteps of the American character in the end paragraphs of Gibson & Sterling’s “Red Star winter orbit” story.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Star,_Winter_Orbit

    Once we’ve crawled out of the jar, there would be no way to bring us back in. Some people cannot tolerate freedom. Just imagine all these hoi polloi polluting the Asteroid Belt with heir smelly GHGs.

    Which makes me think that it is unfortunate that the pioneering spirit of the nineteenth and twentieth century Americans seems gone for good.

    Hélas, tout passe, tout casse, le joint et le cul lassent…

    (Excuse my French)

    🙂

  732. @Anatoly Karlin
    @Mikel

    (1) Mr. XYZ isn't my buddy.

    (2) I didn't express any position on gender-affirming treatments for minors. But that's OK, I don't expect much from r*ghtoid debate culture.

    Replies: @Mikel, @Mr. XYZ

    Is AP your buddy? What about German_reader? Or Razib Khan? Or any of the other commenters on here?

    As a side note, re: EHC: One could adopt a principle that EHC is presumptively right on a particular issue unless there is good evidence to the contrary. For HBD, such evidence exists (as well as your article on the false dichotomy between race denial and racism, which is an argument that can be embraced even from a liberal/social justice POV). For totally open borders, some such evidence exists (the failure of colonized peoples to permanently accept being an inferior caste in a hereditary caste system (which applies to Bryan Caplan’s idea that we should have open borders but also a multi-generational denial of voting rights and social safety net access for immigrants and their descendants), as well as the failure to achieve full integration with certain groups in the West). (I do think that the evidence is more solid in favor of supporting much greater immigration liberalization, just not to fully open borders levels for the West.) For anti-natalism, such evidence exists because EHC anti-natalists are evolutionarily being selected against and because natalism, if done eugenically, can be a huge boost to society. But on the other stuff, EHC does strike me as being more likely to have reason relative to the proles. EHC is more pro-free speech relative to the proles, for instance.

    The issue with conquering unwilling peoples for their human capital would have, I would have thought, been more widely supported by EHC had this idea been more widely practiced in recent times. Yet countries generally frown on such a practice. For instance, the US could have conquered Canada, Australia, and New Zealand during WWI by allying with the Central Powers instead of the Entente (pre-USW) but chose not to do this because it didn’t see a need for this. Likewise, even Nazi-era Germans (at least pre-Fall of France) would have probably balked at the idea of forcibly incorporating the Netherlands into Germany even though the Dutch and the Deutsch originated as one people. (Austria was a different case because Austrians themselves wanted such a union back in 1919; ditto for the Sudeten Germans.) If greater economies of scale were that vital, why wouldn’t Japan and South Korea have put their past grievances behind them and have agreed to form a confederation between the two of them? This is what my general issue with pro-war Russian logic was about how Russia needs additional human capital and all of that. You want it? Then go and do what Israelis are doing! Else, just accept your status as a regional power benefitting you and instead seek to join the EU.

    Makes one wonder if EHC is also correct in general about Putin killing his critics even if they might be wrong about specific cases. If Israel was led by an authoritarian leader who was a former Mossad agent, and his critics ended up getting killed or dying in mysterious circumstances one by one, I’d also be very wary of him.

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @Mr. XYZ


    Then go and do what Israelis are doing! Else, just accept your status as a regional power benefitting you and instead seek to join the EU.
     
    Бл☆дь, Как-же ты за☆бал со своим Израилем...

    Anyways, all these Trannies and LGBTQ discussions made me want to post some nice music with a sensible message:

    https://youtu.be/xfmqrs3-mE0
    , @Anatoly Karlin
    @Mr. XYZ


    Is AP your buddy? What about German_reader? Or Razib Khan? Or any of the other commenters on here?
     
    No. Even to the extent that a "thing" or "object" can be said to have anthropomorphic characteristics such as a capacity for friendships, it's quite absurd to apply that label to other entities that hate it, despise it, or hold it in contempt.

    As a side note, re: EHC: One could adopt a principle that EHC is presumptively right on a particular issue unless there is good evidence to the contrary.
     
    Yes, that's a good rule of thumb. One needs to make a distinction between EHC in the non-ironic sense, the bearers of the arguments that will win out long-term, and conformist mids who flock in their general direction, the types who are vegan for climate change reasons, or support Ukraine for incorrect (Ukraine as direct champion of progressive causes) and/or evil (Ukraine as based conservative ethno-state) reasons. For instance, NAFO fellas (founded by a Polish alt r*ghtoid) would be a good example of that.

    EHC is more pro-free speech relative to the proles, for instance.
     
    Correct. Support for freedom of speech goes up with IQ, including even for racists, even as racist sentiment diminishes to near zero amongst EHC.

    Likewise, even Nazi-era Germans (at least pre-Fall of France) would have probably balked at the idea of forcibly incorporating the Netherlands into Germany even though the Dutch and the Deutsch originated as one people.
     
    The Dutch as a wayward German people was widespread even in mid-19C Germany. I was amused when Friedrich List in The National System took an abrupt detour from economics to go on an extended rant about how the Netherlands was really a part of Germany and should be integrated into it.

    Makes one wonder if EHC is also correct in general about Putin killing his critics even if they might be wrong about specific cases.
     
    Yes. The evidence for that has become a great deal crisper in the past few years.

    What about making the killing proportional to mental ability? So, killing one pig for every 100 chickens? Would that work?
     
    That was my argument here: https://akarlin.com/animals/

    Also, what about giving unwilling parents (especially, but not only, unwilling *male* parents) a *unilateral* opt-out from paying child support?:
     
    I oppose that since the demand is an expression of male privilege.

    If anything m*noids need to pay reparations to womyn for thousands of years of patriarchy.

    BTW, re: Elite human capital: What do you make of Peter Singer’s (certainly elite human capital) support for (presumably painless) infanticide for disabled human infants, such as those with Down’s syndrome, up to one month after their birth?
     
    Yes, I support that. There are horrific stories around that: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2803834/I-wish-d-aborted-son-ve-spent-47-years-caring-s-shocking-admission-read-judge.html

    I think that, especially with the benefit of hindsight, Russia would have been better served creating a network state for Western dissident researchers.
     
    I lobbied the idea but nobody was interested. The only slightly interesting thing that came out of it was probably on the level of Noah Carl writing culture war type articles for RT.

    I myself was blacklisted from RT for a long time on account of the RationalWiki article (as I keep saying the memes are all American) and now I suppose it's all irrelevant and for the best anyway.

    Kremlins are too low IQ and ideologically uncommitted to pursuing any such project.

    Steven Seagal, Sameera Khan, Jackson Hinkle, Scott Ritter - that is their intellectual level, the types with whom they feel comfortable corresponding with "on an even level".

    Ultimately I guess that this further shows the bankruptcy of Russian nationalism: Instead of thinking bigger and trying to appeal to talented Westerners who are dissatisfied with the existing Western order, Russia essentially adopted a strategy similar to that of pre-Holocaust Germany, along with appealing to the lowest common denominator in the West with its talk about Satanism and the like. “Putin boomer” should become a total meme lol!
     
    Obviously one could quibble with the extent to which kremlins ever pursued the Russian nationalist program, but regardless, it's all invalidated now anyway. I said before that the correct macro-historical interpretation of the Ukraine War is a last gasp Russian attempt to survive as a culturally autonomous civilization alongside the American Empire, China, and maybe India, but in retrospect given what it has revealed about its people and elite, the project was doomed from the start, even had Ukraine been overrun early on (it was a close run thing in the first month).

    https://twitter.com/powerfultakes/status/1673083124144562186

    As a side note, Yegor Prosvirnin’s tragic death and especially its sad and brutal manner could retroactively be viewed as an omen of sorts for the fate and future of Russian nationalism in general.

     

    Yes, I had similar thoughts.

    https://twitter.com/powerfultakes/status/1590365612135845890

    🌐🏳️‍🌈 won on Dec 27, 2021.

    I also disagree with you that Western rightoids should have supported Russia over Ukraine in the current war because a stronger Russia would not have prevented Woke Western liberals from cancelling Western rightoids later on, just like a much stronger Soviet Union did not prevent Western anti-Communists from cancelling those Western liberals who were deemed sympathetic to Communism, at least for a while.
     
    Getting a sovereign Great Power pole somewhat aligned with their least dysfunctional ideas (or potentially alignable at any rate) was realistically their one hope, forlorn as it was.

    I suppose it's irrelevant one way or the other now, they're going to continue getting crushed and humiliated at an accelerating pace. I'm going to derive some not inconsiderable Schadenfreude from seeing it happen to the John Johnson and LatW neocon types. To those r*ghtoids I like, my suggestion would be to jump ship before their remaining stocks of social capital goes to zero (that is, align with 🌐🏳️‍🌈, make a bet on the CPC, or on network states - or distribute across them to reduce risk).

    However the majority of them are just going to attack the messenger and seethe quietly in spiteful loserdom - many examples of that helpfully provisioned here - but that's OK too.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Mr. XYZ, @Mr. XYZ

  733. @Anatoly Karlin
    @Mikel

    It's just an unreflective r*ghtoid (but I repeat myself) take. Progressive high EHC countries like Sweden, Norway, Finland have pedaled back on child sex transition. It's highly dubious it will ever enjoy widespread acceptance.

    Child sex transition isn't a particularly appealing asset to invest in for an object that is thinking about how to front-run EHC. There are many much better bets, such as transhumanism, vegetarianism (anti-killing higher animals more specifically), women being socially pressured to adopt husband's surname, etc. are some examples.

    I addressed a point by AP before XYZ engaged me.

    I couldn't care less about this blog's ruins. It should have been put out of its misery long ago, if XYZ accelerates the process, more power to it.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Ivashka the fool, @Mr. XYZ, @Mikel, @AP, @A123

    (anti-killing higher animals more specifically)

    What about making the killing proportional to mental ability? So, killing one pig for every 100 chickens? Would that work?

    Also, what about giving unwilling parents (especially, but not only, unwilling *male* parents) a *unilateral* opt-out from paying child support?:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paper_abortion

    Right now, women who never want to risk being forced to pay child support and who live in a place where abortion is legal can simply take a pregnancy test every month and then get an abortion if they are pregnant. But for men, the options are either abstinence from all penis-in-vagina sex with all fertile and potentially fertile cisgender women for their entire lives or getting surgically castrated, since even vasectomies and bilateral epididymectomies can fail, even when they are combined. For instance, here’s an article about the latter failing (but not for humans):

    https://scienceon.kisti.re.kr/srch/selectPORSrchArticle.do?cn=NART95809445

    Child support insurance would be great, but it doesn’t actually exist, would be unaffordable for those who aren’t rich even if it did exist (as specialty insurance generally is), and could potentially be null, void, and unenforceable on public policy grounds, such as if judges think that the existence of such insurance makes non-custodial parents more likely to abandon their children.

    As for trans rights specifically, they are moving in quite a positive direction. In regards to child transition specifically, Bioliberalism on Twitter proposed a compromise where children would do brain scans and the ones who are likely to have trans brains would be allowed to begin transitioning in childhood, including with hormone blockers and whatnot. (Trans people sometimes, if not often, have unique brains.) The other trans kids can socially transition in childhood but wait until adulthood to physically transition. It might be unfair to them, but it would reduce the risk of false trans positives and thus of subsequent transition regret later on (and if you regret your transition, there aren’t really any super-good options for you; we don’t have the tech to grow new genuine breasts or a genuine new ding-dong for you in such a scenario).

    BTW, re: Elite human capital: What do you make of Peter Singer’s (certainly elite human capital) support for (presumably painless) infanticide for disabled human infants, such as those with Down’s syndrome, up to one month after their birth?

  734. @Mr. XYZ
    @Anatoly Karlin

    Is AP your buddy? What about German_reader? Or Razib Khan? Or any of the other commenters on here?

    As a side note, re: EHC: One could adopt a principle that EHC is presumptively right on a particular issue unless there is good evidence to the contrary. For HBD, such evidence exists (as well as your article on the false dichotomy between race denial and racism, which is an argument that can be embraced even from a liberal/social justice POV). For totally open borders, some such evidence exists (the failure of colonized peoples to permanently accept being an inferior caste in a hereditary caste system (which applies to Bryan Caplan's idea that we should have open borders but also a multi-generational denial of voting rights and social safety net access for immigrants and their descendants), as well as the failure to achieve full integration with certain groups in the West). (I do think that the evidence is more solid in favor of supporting much greater immigration liberalization, just not to fully open borders levels for the West.) For anti-natalism, such evidence exists because EHC anti-natalists are evolutionarily being selected against and because natalism, if done eugenically, can be a huge boost to society. But on the other stuff, EHC does strike me as being more likely to have reason relative to the proles. EHC is more pro-free speech relative to the proles, for instance.

    The issue with conquering unwilling peoples for their human capital would have, I would have thought, been more widely supported by EHC had this idea been more widely practiced in recent times. Yet countries generally frown on such a practice. For instance, the US could have conquered Canada, Australia, and New Zealand during WWI by allying with the Central Powers instead of the Entente (pre-USW) but chose not to do this because it didn't see a need for this. Likewise, even Nazi-era Germans (at least pre-Fall of France) would have probably balked at the idea of forcibly incorporating the Netherlands into Germany even though the Dutch and the Deutsch originated as one people. (Austria was a different case because Austrians themselves wanted such a union back in 1919; ditto for the Sudeten Germans.) If greater economies of scale were that vital, why wouldn't Japan and South Korea have put their past grievances behind them and have agreed to form a confederation between the two of them? This is what my general issue with pro-war Russian logic was about how Russia needs additional human capital and all of that. You want it? Then go and do what Israelis are doing! Else, just accept your status as a regional power benefitting you and instead seek to join the EU.

    Makes one wonder if EHC is also correct in general about Putin killing his critics even if they might be wrong about specific cases. If Israel was led by an authoritarian leader who was a former Mossad agent, and his critics ended up getting killed or dying in mysterious circumstances one by one, I'd also be very wary of him.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Anatoly Karlin

    Then go and do what Israelis are doing! Else, just accept your status as a regional power benefitting you and instead seek to join the EU.

    Бл☆дь, Как-же ты за☆бал со своим Израилем…

    Anyways, all these Trannies and LGBTQ discussions made me want to post some nice music with a sensible message:

  735. @Anatoly Karlin
    @Mikel

    It's just an unreflective r*ghtoid (but I repeat myself) take. Progressive high EHC countries like Sweden, Norway, Finland have pedaled back on child sex transition. It's highly dubious it will ever enjoy widespread acceptance.

    Child sex transition isn't a particularly appealing asset to invest in for an object that is thinking about how to front-run EHC. There are many much better bets, such as transhumanism, vegetarianism (anti-killing higher animals more specifically), women being socially pressured to adopt husband's surname, etc. are some examples.

    I addressed a point by AP before XYZ engaged me.

    I couldn't care less about this blog's ruins. It should have been put out of its misery long ago, if XYZ accelerates the process, more power to it.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Ivashka the fool, @Mr. XYZ, @Mikel, @AP, @A123

    I couldn’t care less about this blog’s ruins. It should have been put out of its misery long ago, if XYZ accelerates the process, more power to it.

    You’re such an extremist… 🙂

    Tell me please, what do you think (if anything at all) about Dyumin?

    What are his chances to become the next president of the RF ?

    • Replies: @silviosilver
    @Ivashka the fool


    You’re such an extremist…
     
    He'd make for an interesting Houellebecq character though: eternal alien mistakes a lucky breaky for skill with the crypto bubble; returns to the beloved fatherland which, he convinces himself, is at the incipient stage of an atomic space empire; unable to live with the incongruity between the high self-regard he has for his intellect and the spectacular public failure of his confident war prediction, he makes a desperate attempt to maintain relevance by attracting attention from - which he ambitiously deems 'front-running' - EHC by 'unpersoning' himself, but succeeds chiefly in further beclowning himself; and in the meantime keeps his fading dreams of opulence alive by fleecing starry-eyed twitter subs with price-movement analyses worthy of a carnival barker, supplemented with LARPish geek talk about 'network states.'

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

    , @AP
    @Ivashka the fool

    He has a low opinion of him: “ Dyumin graduated from a backwater military college, has a plagiarized PhD, and a reputation for stupidity even relative to Zolotov ("у которого в голове, как меня многие уверяли, - даже не "опилки", а сплошной монолит" - Strelkov).”

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

  736. @sudden death
    @silviosilver


    does immigration – more correctly, mass immigration – serve the existing population of the country being imminvaded
     
    Most probably today equivalents of George Washinton slave owner type super wealthy white people really do think so now as they thought then too - mass brown/black immigration really serves them and they have the means to immunise themselves from negative effects as current Brazil/Mexico wealthy elite has the means to immunise themselves from everyday violence in the streets while remaing rich&safe with their own bodyguards and high walls. Even if there is no lawful racism and white supremacy differently from Washington era in North America.

    Replies: @S, @silviosilver

    Most probably today equivalents of George Washinton slave owner type super wealthy white people really do think so now as they thought then too

    Serves them, but doesn’t serve the common good.

  737. @Anatoly Karlin
    @Mikel

    It's just an unreflective r*ghtoid (but I repeat myself) take. Progressive high EHC countries like Sweden, Norway, Finland have pedaled back on child sex transition. It's highly dubious it will ever enjoy widespread acceptance.

    Child sex transition isn't a particularly appealing asset to invest in for an object that is thinking about how to front-run EHC. There are many much better bets, such as transhumanism, vegetarianism (anti-killing higher animals more specifically), women being socially pressured to adopt husband's surname, etc. are some examples.

    I addressed a point by AP before XYZ engaged me.

    I couldn't care less about this blog's ruins. It should have been put out of its misery long ago, if XYZ accelerates the process, more power to it.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Ivashka the fool, @Mr. XYZ, @Mikel, @AP, @A123

    Back to the topic of network states:

    I think that, especially with the benefit of hindsight, Russia would have been better served creating a network state for Western dissident researchers. As in, not get involved in Ukraine in either 2014 or 2022, open its borders with Ukraine, Belarus, and Kazakhstan wide open, and use the money that it would have spent on Ukraine (including on Crimea) on building the framework for a network state for Western dissident researchers. The kind of Westerners who are willing to research interesting stuff but who lack funding for it from conventional sources such as universities: Emil Kirkegaard, John Fuerst, et cetera. There was some potential in achieving greater progress in that department had Russia been willing to financially commit to this project instead of obsessing over the need to regather “its lost people”. Western dissident researchers don’t have all that much funding, especially after Greg Cochran essentially ripped off Ron Unz (which was clever of Cochran and a useful personal reward for him being an intelligent pro-natalist and having five smart children of his own, but still highly detrimental to his overall cause since it made Unz much less willing to invest in future dissident research).

    Ultimately I guess that this further shows the bankruptcy of Russian nationalism: Instead of thinking bigger and trying to appeal to talented Westerners who are dissatisfied with the existing Western order, Russia essentially adopted a strategy similar to that of pre-Holocaust Germany, along with appealing to the lowest common denominator in the West with its talk about Satanism and the like. “Putin boomer” should become a total meme lol!

    As a side note, Yegor Prosvirnin’s tragic death and especially its sad and brutal manner could retroactively be viewed as an omen of sorts for the fate and future of Russian nationalism in general. I also disagree with you that Western rightoids should have supported Russia over Ukraine in the current war because a stronger Russia would not have prevented Woke Western liberals from cancelling Western rightoids later on, just like a much stronger Soviet Union did not prevent Western anti-Communists from cancelling those Western liberals who were deemed sympathetic to Communism, at least for a while. And a stronger Russia would not have even been an attractive civilizational model anyway because it’s not a huge center of human progress or human achievement nowadays like either the West or East Asia are. If Western rightoids want to spite the Wokes, a much more effective strategy would be to attach themselves to China, which is a paragon of human achievement in comparison to Russia. But some/many of them might be too Sinophobic for this. Which is good for the West, including its Wokes, unfortunately.

    BTW, in several decades’ time, we shall check and see if any network states are among the world’s biggest elite science producers and/or R & D spenders. That would be a major long-term test of their viability and ability to shape the world. For a network state to be really respectable in the R & D spending department right now, for instance, it would probably need to spend about the entirety of Elon Musk’s total net worth on R & D every single year. This would require huge funding for these network states. Crowdfunding?

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @Mr. XYZ


    For a network state to be really respectable in the R & D spending department right now, for instance, it would probably need to spend about the entirety of Elon Musk’s total net worth on R & D every single year. This would require huge funding for these network states. Crowdfunding?
     
    https://youtu.be/zXH6fhueO3I
  738. @Mr. XYZ
    @Anatoly Karlin

    Back to the topic of network states:

    I think that, especially with the benefit of hindsight, Russia would have been better served creating a network state for Western dissident researchers. As in, not get involved in Ukraine in either 2014 or 2022, open its borders with Ukraine, Belarus, and Kazakhstan wide open, and use the money that it would have spent on Ukraine (including on Crimea) on building the framework for a network state for Western dissident researchers. The kind of Westerners who are willing to research interesting stuff but who lack funding for it from conventional sources such as universities: Emil Kirkegaard, John Fuerst, et cetera. There was some potential in achieving greater progress in that department had Russia been willing to financially commit to this project instead of obsessing over the need to regather "its lost people". Western dissident researchers don't have all that much funding, especially after Greg Cochran essentially ripped off Ron Unz (which was clever of Cochran and a useful personal reward for him being an intelligent pro-natalist and having five smart children of his own, but still highly detrimental to his overall cause since it made Unz much less willing to invest in future dissident research).

    Ultimately I guess that this further shows the bankruptcy of Russian nationalism: Instead of thinking bigger and trying to appeal to talented Westerners who are dissatisfied with the existing Western order, Russia essentially adopted a strategy similar to that of pre-Holocaust Germany, along with appealing to the lowest common denominator in the West with its talk about Satanism and the like. "Putin boomer" should become a total meme lol!

    As a side note, Yegor Prosvirnin's tragic death and especially its sad and brutal manner could retroactively be viewed as an omen of sorts for the fate and future of Russian nationalism in general. I also disagree with you that Western rightoids should have supported Russia over Ukraine in the current war because a stronger Russia would not have prevented Woke Western liberals from cancelling Western rightoids later on, just like a much stronger Soviet Union did not prevent Western anti-Communists from cancelling those Western liberals who were deemed sympathetic to Communism, at least for a while. And a stronger Russia would not have even been an attractive civilizational model anyway because it's not a huge center of human progress or human achievement nowadays like either the West or East Asia are. If Western rightoids want to spite the Wokes, a much more effective strategy would be to attach themselves to China, which is a paragon of human achievement in comparison to Russia. But some/many of them might be too Sinophobic for this. Which is good for the West, including its Wokes, unfortunately.

    BTW, in several decades' time, we shall check and see if any network states are among the world's biggest elite science producers and/or R & D spenders. That would be a major long-term test of their viability and ability to shape the world. For a network state to be really respectable in the R & D spending department right now, for instance, it would probably need to spend about the entirety of Elon Musk's total net worth on R & D every single year. This would require huge funding for these network states. Crowdfunding?

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

    For a network state to be really respectable in the R & D spending department right now, for instance, it would probably need to spend about the entirety of Elon Musk’s total net worth on R & D every single year. This would require huge funding for these network states. Crowdfunding?

  739. @Ivashka the fool
    @Anatoly Karlin


    I couldn’t care less about this blog’s ruins. It should have been put out of its misery long ago, if XYZ accelerates the process, more power to it.

     

    You're such an extremist... 🙂

    Tell me please, what do you think (if anything at all) about Dyumin?

    What are his chances to become the next president of the RF ?

    Replies: @silviosilver, @AP

    You’re such an extremist…

    He’d make for an interesting Houellebecq character though: eternal alien mistakes a lucky breaky for skill with the crypto bubble; returns to the beloved fatherland which, he convinces himself, is at the incipient stage of an atomic space empire; unable to live with the incongruity between the high self-regard he has for his intellect and the spectacular public failure of his confident war prediction, he makes a desperate attempt to maintain relevance by attracting attention from – which he ambitiously deems ‘front-running’ – EHC by ‘unpersoning’ himself, but succeeds chiefly in further beclowning himself; and in the meantime keeps his fading dreams of opulence alive by fleecing starry-eyed twitter subs with price-movement analyses worthy of a carnival barker, supplemented with LARPish geek talk about ‘network states.’

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @silviosilver

    I don't blame Anatoly, he has a need to belong, to impress, some people just need to be loved. Anyway, most of us are weird, each one in their own special way. I most certainly am bizarre, and I totally own it. Sometimes, we just need to open out hearts and make it as large as the heart of a giraffe and to prevent our inner jackal from biting.

    https://youtu.be/Xov5z_GJ9Zs

    🙃

    Ah yeah, wanted to reply to your comment above about the elite & the common good. I wonder if there is still anything left to define as common good in an atomized, postmodern and multiculti society. And if there isn't, then why opposing the degradation that this dying society has brought upon itself?

    Replies: @silviosilver

  740. @AP
    @Anatoly Karlin

    What is EHC? I assume that the last two letters stand for "Human Capital?"

    Replies: @Anatoly Karlin, @Yahya, @Mr. XYZ

    It stands for Elite Human Capital.

    As a side note, the Elite Human Capital that should probably be paid most attention to is the younger EHC that also wants to breed a lot. So, essentially younger versions of what Mitt Romney, Amy Coney Barrett, Ben Shapiro, Greg Cochran, et cetera would later become.

    The more virile particular members of EHC are, the more influence that they will have on future generations of EHC. There are, of course, environmentally-induced changes in opinion among EHC as well, so it’s all a question of which influence is stronger. Public opinion has generally shifted leftwards over the years, decades, and centuries due to convincing arguments by the left, but will this continue being the case indefinitely in the future?

    Are the descendants of Mitt Romney, Amy Coney Barrett, Ben Shapiro, Greg Cochran, et cetera going to be bleeding-heart liberals? More liberal than their ancestors, Yes, very likely. But as liberal as the descendants of EHC members who are currently liberal? I’m rather skeptical.

    As a side note, as I told Anatoly Karlin, I’m skeptical that EHC has unequivocal power to shape public opinion. If it had, then there would actually be a serious movement to get rid of the natural-born citizen requirement for the US Presidency. But there isn’t. Heck, EHC has failed to even get the Equal Rights Amendment *indisputably* ratified as a part of the US Constitution even after 50 years. EHC also probably mostly supported Roe v. Wade, but SCOTUS overruled it last year (though with pro-choicers winning abortion referendums on the state level afterwards). For that matter, since Russian EHC is more pro-West than Russians as a whole are, why have they failed to move the rest of the Russian population to their point of view? It is simply due to Putinist censorship and propaganda, or what?

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @Mr. XYZ

    So, Yeah, overall worth noting that future EHC will be considerably more conservative in the current political environment relative to current EHC.

  741. @AP
    @Wokechoke


    While the Russians were battling it out with the Turks from Ivan Grozny to Peter the Great era through Elizabeth to Catherine and finally Alexander and Nicholas where were these Poles again?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish–Ottoman_War_(1672–1676)

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish–Ottoman_War_(1683–1699)

    There’s around 30 years of kinetic contact. That’s about it.
     
    You lie by omission. Full list is here:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish%E2%80%93Ottoman_Wars

    At the Battle of Khotyn in 1621, a Polish-Ukrainian force defeated a massive Ottoman-Tatar army that was about the same size as the one that would be defeated at Vienna a few generations later:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Khotyn_(1621)

    Compared to this…

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Russo-Turkish_wars

    400 years of fighting the Turks around the Black Sea and the Danube and Volga Rivers.

     

    The Polish victories over the Ottomsns were far more consequential for European history and for keeping the Turks out of Europe then were the Russian battles with them over some peripheral areas, or later victories when the Ottomans were a fading power and no longer much of a threat. When the Turks were a superpower, at their peak, the Poles fought and defeated them. Russia mostly just picked over the leftovers afterward.

    What were the Poles doing as the Russians finally ejected the Turk from the northern rim of the Black Sea? Oh that’s right, preparing an all out assault on Moscow in cahoots with Napoleon.
     
    Russia wanted an alliance with the Turks and had one for a few years, before the Turks rejected the Russians.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russo-Ottoman_alliance

    “The Russo-Ottoman alliance was a defensive alliance between the Russian Empire and the Ottoman Empire, directed against France between 1799 and 1806, during the Napoleonic Wars.”

    Replies: @Mikhail, @Mr. XYZ

    Ironically, it would have probably been better had the Russo-Ottoman alliance survived and had the Ottomans not been expelled from the Caucasus and the Balkans. This would have prevented the ethnic cleansing and/or genocide of Balkan and Caucasian Muslims:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circassian_genocide

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhacir

    And would have also prevented the Ottoman Empire from feeling paranoid about its own security, which in turn would have very likely prevented the Armenian Genocide since the Ottoman Empire would not have had any reason to view Armenians (an ancient Christian people) as potential pro-Russian fifth columnists in such a scenario.

    Those Balkanoids who disliked Ottoman rule could have simply moved to Russia. Anatoly Karlin argues that it’s irrational for people to care about arbitrary territories (such as whether the West becomes a dump), which would apply just as much in this case (and, for that matter, in a scenario where Ukraine ethnically cleanses Crimea and/or the Donbass without ever actually resorting to mass murder). Balkanoids would have had to accept that their traditional homelands would have permanently remained under Muslim rule but would have had the option of living in Russia, an Orthodox Christian country. Interestingly enough, nowadays Turkey is a pretty pleasant place to live in, especially for a Muslim country. Comparable to Bulgaria, Serbia, and Macedonia, in fact.

  742. @Ivashka the fool
    @Anatoly Karlin


    I couldn’t care less about this blog’s ruins. It should have been put out of its misery long ago, if XYZ accelerates the process, more power to it.

     

    You're such an extremist... 🙂

    Tell me please, what do you think (if anything at all) about Dyumin?

    What are his chances to become the next president of the RF ?

    Replies: @silviosilver, @AP

    He has a low opinion of him: “ Dyumin graduated from a backwater military college, has a plagiarized PhD, and a reputation for stupidity even relative to Zolotov (“у которого в голове, как меня многие уверяли, – даже не “опилки”, а сплошной монолит” – Strelkov).”

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @AP

    Well Girkin is an interesting fellow, but he infortunately is a shlimazl, anything he touches ends up a catastrophe. Moreover, he's an agent provocateur and I am always wondering whether he really believes what he says or writes.

  743. @silviosilver
    @Ivashka the fool


    You’re such an extremist…
     
    He'd make for an interesting Houellebecq character though: eternal alien mistakes a lucky breaky for skill with the crypto bubble; returns to the beloved fatherland which, he convinces himself, is at the incipient stage of an atomic space empire; unable to live with the incongruity between the high self-regard he has for his intellect and the spectacular public failure of his confident war prediction, he makes a desperate attempt to maintain relevance by attracting attention from - which he ambitiously deems 'front-running' - EHC by 'unpersoning' himself, but succeeds chiefly in further beclowning himself; and in the meantime keeps his fading dreams of opulence alive by fleecing starry-eyed twitter subs with price-movement analyses worthy of a carnival barker, supplemented with LARPish geek talk about 'network states.'

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

    I don’t blame Anatoly, he has a need to belong, to impress, some people just need to be loved. Anyway, most of us are weird, each one in their own special way. I most certainly am bizarre, and I totally own it. Sometimes, we just need to open out hearts and make it as large as the heart of a giraffe and to prevent our inner jackal from biting.

    🙃

    Ah yeah, wanted to reply to your comment above about the elite & the common good. I wonder if there is still anything left to define as common good in an atomized, postmodern and multiculti society. And if there isn’t, then why opposing the degradation that this dying society has brought upon itself?

    • Replies: @silviosilver
    @Ivashka the fool


    Anyway, most of us are weird, each one in their own special way.
     
    Sure, I take it for granted than anyone posting here is something of an eccentric - myself assuredly included. Still, some are more so than others.

    And if there isn’t, then why opposing the degradation that this dying society has brought upon itself?
     
    Because, bad as things are, they can always get worse. In fact, ongoing mass immigration virtually guarantees things will get worse. (I'll go hoarse repeating myself: soon-to-be four billion sub-Saharans, many of which'll be coming to a place near you.) I'm not ready to resign myself to that fate. There's plenty of good living to be done yet. Il faut profiter de la vie!

    Btw, thanks for answering my question about whether there has ever existed what you'd consider a model society. If you'd be prepared to endure the Spartan lifestyle that would presumably be required to maintain that hermit kingdom, I'm not sure why you're unwilling to make the much smaller sacrifice of relocating to smalltown Russia - where lives are presumably less influenced by modish values - and there lead at least some small portion of your people by example. If you're not willing to, if you'd prefer to wait for other people to make the necessary changes, to set up the kind of society you prefer, then I don't think you can blame me for questioning how important your declared values really are to you. I know I'm getting personal, but I mean, don't you yourself judge other people more by what they do and less by what they say?

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

  744. @AP
    @Ivashka the fool

    He has a low opinion of him: “ Dyumin graduated from a backwater military college, has a plagiarized PhD, and a reputation for stupidity even relative to Zolotov ("у которого в голове, как меня многие уверяли, - даже не "опилки", а сплошной монолит" - Strelkov).”

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

    Well Girkin is an interesting fellow, but he infortunately is a shlimazl, anything he touches ends up a catastrophe. Moreover, he’s an agent provocateur and I am always wondering whether he really believes what he says or writes.

  745. @Anatoly Karlin
    @Mikel

    It's just an unreflective r*ghtoid (but I repeat myself) take. Progressive high EHC countries like Sweden, Norway, Finland have pedaled back on child sex transition. It's highly dubious it will ever enjoy widespread acceptance.

    Child sex transition isn't a particularly appealing asset to invest in for an object that is thinking about how to front-run EHC. There are many much better bets, such as transhumanism, vegetarianism (anti-killing higher animals more specifically), women being socially pressured to adopt husband's surname, etc. are some examples.

    I addressed a point by AP before XYZ engaged me.

    I couldn't care less about this blog's ruins. It should have been put out of its misery long ago, if XYZ accelerates the process, more power to it.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Ivashka the fool, @Mr. XYZ, @Mikel, @AP, @A123

    I couldn’t care less about this blog’s ruins. It should have been put out of its misery long ago,

    Considering it’s part of the ruins of the Unz horrorshow and it functions without moderation, it’s not so bad really. There are still some good brains left, though you’ve just put off two of the best. But it’s funny how you’ve let Putin change your mind even on that issue. A year ago this blog should have disappeared because people here weren’t rightist enough to appreciate the value of the triune project and now it should disappear because we’re just a bunch of old fashioned “rightoids”.

    I’m not really much of a rightist or nationalist myself but I’ll take an advanced, functional nation state (say Reagan’s US) over those ethereal network state projects any time of the day. Zuzalu is part of NATO, btw. If any of those elite humans (some of them clear freaks) that like gathering there ever dream of changing that status Stoltenberg will make sure to remind them who’s the real elite. Reminds me of a guy who bought a small piece of the Great Salt Desert for $5,000 on ebay, went to live there and declared it an independent republic. You could go visit him through a dirt road and he would stamp your passport with the emblem of his republic. No authority ever bothered him. Why would they? Perhaps he even attracted some needed tourism to the nearby sleepy towns.

    • Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
    @Mikel

    There was a guy on Less Wrong who had a remote place in Arizona with no utilities, solar panels, and wireless internet who was really into death. The logic cannot be proven wrong but it still is a tough sell.

  746. AP says:
    @Anatoly Karlin
    @Mikel

    It's just an unreflective r*ghtoid (but I repeat myself) take. Progressive high EHC countries like Sweden, Norway, Finland have pedaled back on child sex transition. It's highly dubious it will ever enjoy widespread acceptance.

    Child sex transition isn't a particularly appealing asset to invest in for an object that is thinking about how to front-run EHC. There are many much better bets, such as transhumanism, vegetarianism (anti-killing higher animals more specifically), women being socially pressured to adopt husband's surname, etc. are some examples.

    I addressed a point by AP before XYZ engaged me.

    I couldn't care less about this blog's ruins. It should have been put out of its misery long ago, if XYZ accelerates the process, more power to it.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Ivashka the fool, @Mr. XYZ, @Mikel, @AP, @A123

    Progressive high EHC countries like Sweden, Norway, Finland have pedaled back on child sex transition. It’s highly dubious it will ever enjoy widespread acceptance.

    Child sex transition seems to be the modern bizarre product of American Puritans, who are the native USA’s EHC. Because of American soft power it was adopted elsewhere briefly but the other countries are indeed backing away from it. The Puritans will too, eventually.

    • Replies: @Anatoly Karlin
    @AP

    The elite (as distinct from EHC as I define it) approach is that child sex transition is bad, and most certainly not for their own children, but energetically signaling against it is low-brow and low-status, and something that should be left to r*ghtoids.

    There are many other examples of that, the most obvious one being race/IQ/crime, SJW'ism as class struggle broadly, etc.

  747. @German_reader
    @Yevardian

    Yeah, I've got enough of this shitshow myself. Iirc you've got my mail in case you want to stay in touch.

    Replies: @Yevardian

    Well, everything comes to an end eventually. You’ll have to send it again.

    Dunno if Mr Unz has yet noticed Karlin’s would-be-shocking (shockingly banal, maybe) “transition”, but if he has, it might be a sign to close Karlin’s legacy Open Threads down.
    Presumably that is “Its” goal in coming here.
    Final galaxybrain take: XYZ is actually Karlin’s former (???) Oliver D Smith, reconciled again in ‘neurodiversity’, working with Karlin (notice the lack of posting limit?) to erase “Its” wrongthink past.

    @GermanReader

    [MORE]

    Must have accidently deleted message when cleaning it out (I made that throwaway email specifically for signing up for BS promos etc.), so you’ll have to send it again the @burner19482010@gmail

    • Replies: @Anatoly Karlin
    @Yevardian

    It's not surprising that a Holocaust "skeptic" and conspiracy purveyor has many interesting ideas about all sorts of things.

    I don't have any moderation powers here, I lost them more than a year ago.

    Replies: @Yevardian

  748. @Ivashka the fool
    @silviosilver

    I don't blame Anatoly, he has a need to belong, to impress, some people just need to be loved. Anyway, most of us are weird, each one in their own special way. I most certainly am bizarre, and I totally own it. Sometimes, we just need to open out hearts and make it as large as the heart of a giraffe and to prevent our inner jackal from biting.

    https://youtu.be/Xov5z_GJ9Zs

    🙃

    Ah yeah, wanted to reply to your comment above about the elite & the common good. I wonder if there is still anything left to define as common good in an atomized, postmodern and multiculti society. And if there isn't, then why opposing the degradation that this dying society has brought upon itself?

    Replies: @silviosilver

    Anyway, most of us are weird, each one in their own special way.

    Sure, I take it for granted than anyone posting here is something of an eccentric – myself assuredly included. Still, some are more so than others.

    And if there isn’t, then why opposing the degradation that this dying society has brought upon itself?

    Because, bad as things are, they can always get worse. In fact, ongoing mass immigration virtually guarantees things will get worse. (I’ll go hoarse repeating myself: soon-to-be four billion sub-Saharans, many of which’ll be coming to a place near you.) I’m not ready to resign myself to that fate. There’s plenty of good living to be done yet. Il faut profiter de la vie!

    Btw, thanks for answering my question about whether there has ever existed what you’d consider a model society. If you’d be prepared to endure the Spartan lifestyle that would presumably be required to maintain that hermit kingdom, I’m not sure why you’re unwilling to make the much smaller sacrifice of relocating to smalltown Russia – where lives are presumably less influenced by modish values – and there lead at least some small portion of your people by example. If you’re not willing to, if you’d prefer to wait for other people to make the necessary changes, to set up the kind of society you prefer, then I don’t think you can blame me for questioning how important your declared values really are to you. I know I’m getting personal, but I mean, don’t you yourself judge other people more by what they do and less by what they say?

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @silviosilver


    I’m not sure why you’re unwilling to make the much smaller sacrifice of relocating to smalltown Russia – where lives are presumably less influenced by modish values – and there lead at least some small portion of your people by example.
     
    A simple answer: family. When I was younger, and more naive and idealistic, I met a woman who has become the mother of my children and would never be capable of living in such a place. Now I have to try to ensure that my kids are to live a meaningful life in the whole postmodern circus. If not for the kids, there wouldn't be much I still care about. Actually, if I was still twenty something and alone, I probably wouldn't have kids and would go right away to become a Buddhist monk. Not kidding. Samsara is a tiresome place.
  749. @Dmitry
    @QCIC

    In the reality of practical life, Russia is more socially/sexually liberal than many Western countries, so people are not going to protest against the brothels, accept this is a normal part of life, perhaps not liking the billboards however because of the negative image to the city. Even I saw, local media in the recent years in Russia is promoting prostitution as a good job for women, with high salary.

    But the rules of speech are a bit different. For example, in the Soviet culture they had kind of Victorian ideas about what they allow in mass culture. Even in the 19th century Russian empire like this, with the concept to read sexual literature only in French language, while Russian literature would have rules so it avoids sex. When old people complain in Russia, it's usually related to what is allowed in media, instead of what is allowed in real life.

    If you read the books of a historian who is famous in Russia (Boris Mironov), in traditional Russian village even in 19th century they couldn't impose Christian rules about sexuality, against more liberal traditional views. According to Mironov, this is one of the many reasons why the Church has to invest a large part of its project into the villages in the 19th century, to try to educate the villagers, not attaining success.

    -

    As for why the 21st century Russian government has been so successful to market to rightwing Americans who logically choose a socially conservative country, not socially liberal country? AP in the forum is an example of this. I think it's an interesting dialectic of the Cold War. One of the changes in the school system in Russia in the last decade, they write in the lesson guide the teachers need to promote "family values", which is terms from the 1970s Republican Party.

    It's the normal practice in Russia, where the explicit culture is imported, here they import in the fashions in America and Fox News, while real underlying Russian culture doesn't change under the surface for centuries.

    It's also true, rightwing voters seem to like more "sexually liberated" politicians, with less "family values". The rightwing voters like Trump, Berlusconi, Johnson, also Putin and a lot of the officials.

    Replies: @Another Polish Perspective, @John Johnson, @silviosilver

    When old people complain in Russia, it’s usually related to what is allowed in media, instead of what is allowed in real life.

    It’s a perfectly valid distinction. Permission vs promotion. If I were “boss of America,” despite my revulsion of the homosexual act, I’d happily permit it. Doesn’t really bother me at all that it exists and I wouldn’t waste any effort trying to stamp it out or penalize it. But why in the world promote it? Why celebrate it? Why elevate it to equal status with heterosexuality? Why kid ourselves that homosexuality, in and of itself, is some tremendous boon we should all be grateful to have in our lives?

    • Replies: @Matra
    @silviosilver

    In his book On Genetic Interests your fellow Australian Frank Salter points out that no matter their proximate interests the ultimate genetic interests of homosexuals align with their co-ethnics. In the past homosexuals, at least those with talent, applied their energies to endeavours, often artistic, that added to their nation's patrimony and therefore contributed to the future without having children. Now under American encouragement they are let loose, under their own flag no less, from all inherited ties. Having observed them - from afar, of course! - for decades I see a very malleable people once all constraints and restraints are removed being operated almost as if by joystick in a way that helps American hegemony by directing their energies against their own nations and traditions. Divide et impera. So far, the weaponisation of homosexuality has been fairly successful.

  750. @Mr. XYZ
    @AP

    It stands for Elite Human Capital.

    As a side note, the Elite Human Capital that should probably be paid most attention to is the younger EHC that also wants to breed a lot. So, essentially younger versions of what Mitt Romney, Amy Coney Barrett, Ben Shapiro, Greg Cochran, et cetera would later become.

    The more virile particular members of EHC are, the more influence that they will have on future generations of EHC. There are, of course, environmentally-induced changes in opinion among EHC as well, so it's all a question of which influence is stronger. Public opinion has generally shifted leftwards over the years, decades, and centuries due to convincing arguments by the left, but will this continue being the case indefinitely in the future?

    Are the descendants of Mitt Romney, Amy Coney Barrett, Ben Shapiro, Greg Cochran, et cetera going to be bleeding-heart liberals? More liberal than their ancestors, Yes, very likely. But as liberal as the descendants of EHC members who are currently liberal? I'm rather skeptical.

    As a side note, as I told Anatoly Karlin, I'm skeptical that EHC has unequivocal power to shape public opinion. If it had, then there would actually be a serious movement to get rid of the natural-born citizen requirement for the US Presidency. But there isn't. Heck, EHC has failed to even get the Equal Rights Amendment *indisputably* ratified as a part of the US Constitution even after 50 years. EHC also probably mostly supported Roe v. Wade, but SCOTUS overruled it last year (though with pro-choicers winning abortion referendums on the state level afterwards). For that matter, since Russian EHC is more pro-West than Russians as a whole are, why have they failed to move the rest of the Russian population to their point of view? It is simply due to Putinist censorship and propaganda, or what?

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    So, Yeah, overall worth noting that future EHC will be considerably more conservative in the current political environment relative to current EHC.

  751. @Mr. XYZ
    @Anatoly Karlin


    Ukrainian nationalism is attractive to EHC only to the extent its an underdog. The Azovites will rightly be kicked to the curb once they outlive their usefulness and it’s time to get progressive.
     
    Ukrainian nationalism isn't just Azov. What about all of those elite Ukrainian econ majors who volunteered for service in the Ukrainian military when Russia invaded, for instance? They're also Ukrainian nationalists. Some of them subsequently got killed, but many probably survived and will help build and maintain a more respectable Ukrainian nationalism in the post-war era.

    In fact, since EHC is dominant, Azov-style Ukrainian nationalism should become less prevalent over time and be replaced by the more respectable Ukrainian nationalism of elite Ukrainian econ majors, et cetera. This should also help Ukrainian EU aspirations by making Ukraine look more civilized, especially if over the next couple of decades Ukraine can also successfully reduce its corruption rate down to Polish levels (a difficult task, but not impossible)--which, in turn, would make Ukraine look not only civilized, but also clean, organized, and relatively honest as well, a huge plus for the EU as it still actively seeks new potential members.

    And there is also (Pan-)European nationalism. Some intellectuals have been attracted to it for decades. Some of the Hapsburgs, for instance, or Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi.

    Also, in regards to network states, some Germans have moved to Paraguay in recent years in response to Germany becoming too totalitarian (COVID vaccine mandates and lockdowns) and too diverse (Muslims):

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R-x46MkYr5Q

    But this hasn't become a mass movement yet and for network states to truly rival the big nation-states/nation-empires, network states would need populations in the hundreds of millions. Else, at best, they would simply become another Singapore or two or three or five or ten or twenty. Very nice and impressive places to live in, especially if they are of high human capital, and certainly nice political and social models for the rest of the world to take a look at, but also certainly nowhere near being actual world-powers.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @Mr. XYZ

    But this hasn’t become a mass movement yet and for network states to truly rival the big nation-states/nation-empires, network states would need populations in the hundreds of millions. Else, at best, they would simply become another Singapore or two or three or five or ten or twenty. Very nice and impressive places to live in, especially if they are of high human capital, and certainly nice political and social models for the rest of the world to take a look at, but also certainly nowhere near being actual world-powers.

    Other than organized religion and political parties, which organizations outside of modern nation-states have amassed memberships in the tens or hundreds of millions? The National Trust (in the UK), Boy Scouts, and Girl Scouts all have membership rolls in the 1-9 million range. All of this simply shows just how hard it is to create an organization independent of religion and political parties that gets extraordinarily large membership rolls that are able to effectively and successfully compete with nation-state world-powers.

  752. Surovikin & Tukhachevsky

    Re: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/armageddon-arrested-has-putin-s-purge-begun/ar-AA1db7Ti?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=caf3a9a0af0b44778ab9ff35599a754f&ei=7

    The “reportedly arrested” wording and claims of insubordination remind one of the Nazi attempt to discredit Soviet General Mikhail Tukhachevsky. At issue is the Machiavellian act of eliminating a competent general.

    Saying that Russian General Sergey Sorovikin might’ve known of Yevgeny Prigozhin’s act beforehand, without noting that others like Sergey Shoigu, Valery Gerasimov and Vladimir Putin might’ve known as well, comes across as an outside attempt to sow discord in Russia.

    Let’s see how this plays out.

    Related:

    https://www.eurasiareview.com/26062023-post-mutiny-assessment-in-russia-oped/

  753. • Replies: @sudden death
    @Mikhail

    Reminder that muh Nazi collaborator was imprisoned by Nazis for declaring Ukrainian independent state and spent nearly all the time under the bars when Nazi war with USSR was going on:


    Bandera was freed from prison in 1939 following the invasion of Poland, and moved to Kraków. He prepared the 1941 proclamation of the Ukrainian state, pledging to work with Nazi Germany after Germany invaded the Soviet Union on 22 June 1941. The Germans disapproved of the proclamation, and for his refusal to rescind the decree, Bandera was arrested by the Gestapo. He was released in 1944 by the Germans in hopes that he could fight the Soviet advance.
    ...................
    The Germans also barred Bandera from moving to newly conquered Lviv, limiting his residency to occupied Cracow. On 5 July, Bandera was placed under house arrest and later, as an honorary inmate in a Berlin prison. On 12 July, the prime minister of the newly formed Ukrainian National Government, Yaroslav Stetsko, was also arrested and taken to Berlin. Although released from custody on 14 July, both were required to stay in Berlin. The Germans closed OUN-B offices in Berlin and Vienna and on 15 September 1941 Bandera and leading OUN members were arrested by the Gestapo.

    By the end of 1941 relations between Nazi Germany and the OUN-B had soured to the point where a Nazi document dated 25 November 1941 stated that "the Bandera Movement is preparing a revolt in the Reichskommissariat which has as its ultimate aim the establishment of an independent Ukraine. All functionaries of the Bandera Movement must be arrested at once and, after thorough interrogation, are to be liquidated".

    In January 1942, Bandera was transferred to Sachsenhausen concentration camp's special prison cell building (Zellenbau) for high-profile political prisoners such as Horia Sima, the chancellor of Austria, Kurt von Schuschnigg or Stefan Grot-Rowecki  and was kept in special, comparatively comfortable detention.
     

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stepan_Bandera

    Replies: @Mikhail

    , @AP
    @Mikhail

    Funny, but it just shows that modern Bandera veneration has little to do with the historical movement

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Mikhail

  754. @Mikhail
    https://twitter.com/OlgaBazova/status/1674064694380843008

    Replies: @sudden death, @AP

    Reminder that muh Nazi collaborator was imprisoned by Nazis for declaring Ukrainian independent state and spent nearly all the time under the bars when Nazi war with USSR was going on:

    Bandera was freed from prison in 1939 following the invasion of Poland, and moved to Kraków. He prepared the 1941 proclamation of the Ukrainian state, pledging to work with Nazi Germany after Germany invaded the Soviet Union on 22 June 1941. The Germans disapproved of the proclamation, and for his refusal to rescind the decree, Bandera was arrested by the Gestapo. He was released in 1944 by the Germans in hopes that he could fight the Soviet advance.
    ……………….
    The Germans also barred Bandera from moving to newly conquered Lviv, limiting his residency to occupied Cracow. On 5 July, Bandera was placed under house arrest and later, as an honorary inmate in a Berlin prison. On 12 July, the prime minister of the newly formed Ukrainian National Government, Yaroslav Stetsko, was also arrested and taken to Berlin. Although released from custody on 14 July, both were required to stay in Berlin. The Germans closed OUN-B offices in Berlin and Vienna and on 15 September 1941 Bandera and leading OUN members were arrested by the Gestapo.

    By the end of 1941 relations between Nazi Germany and the OUN-B had soured to the point where a Nazi document dated 25 November 1941 stated that “the Bandera Movement is preparing a revolt in the Reichskommissariat which has as its ultimate aim the establishment of an independent Ukraine. All functionaries of the Bandera Movement must be arrested at once and, after thorough interrogation, are to be liquidated”.

    In January 1942, Bandera was transferred to Sachsenhausen concentration camp’s special prison cell building (Zellenbau) for high-profile political prisoners such as Horia Sima, the chancellor of Austria, Kurt von Schuschnigg or Stefan Grot-Rowecki  and was kept in special, comparatively comfortable detention.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stepan_Bandera

    • Replies: @Mikhail
    @sudden death

    So the forces in his name killing thousands of Poles, Jews as well as Ukrainians and Russians not PC by OUN/UPA standards is somehow okay?

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard

  755. @silviosilver
    @Ivashka the fool


    Anyway, most of us are weird, each one in their own special way.
     
    Sure, I take it for granted than anyone posting here is something of an eccentric - myself assuredly included. Still, some are more so than others.

    And if there isn’t, then why opposing the degradation that this dying society has brought upon itself?
     
    Because, bad as things are, they can always get worse. In fact, ongoing mass immigration virtually guarantees things will get worse. (I'll go hoarse repeating myself: soon-to-be four billion sub-Saharans, many of which'll be coming to a place near you.) I'm not ready to resign myself to that fate. There's plenty of good living to be done yet. Il faut profiter de la vie!

    Btw, thanks for answering my question about whether there has ever existed what you'd consider a model society. If you'd be prepared to endure the Spartan lifestyle that would presumably be required to maintain that hermit kingdom, I'm not sure why you're unwilling to make the much smaller sacrifice of relocating to smalltown Russia - where lives are presumably less influenced by modish values - and there lead at least some small portion of your people by example. If you're not willing to, if you'd prefer to wait for other people to make the necessary changes, to set up the kind of society you prefer, then I don't think you can blame me for questioning how important your declared values really are to you. I know I'm getting personal, but I mean, don't you yourself judge other people more by what they do and less by what they say?

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

    I’m not sure why you’re unwilling to make the much smaller sacrifice of relocating to smalltown Russia – where lives are presumably less influenced by modish values – and there lead at least some small portion of your people by example.

    A simple answer: family. When I was younger, and more naive and idealistic, I met a woman who has become the mother of my children and would never be capable of living in such a place. Now I have to try to ensure that my kids are to live a meaningful life in the whole postmodern circus. If not for the kids, there wouldn’t be much I still care about. Actually, if I was still twenty something and alone, I probably wouldn’t have kids and would go right away to become a Buddhist monk. Not kidding. Samsara is a tiresome place.

  756. A123 says: • Website
    @Anatoly Karlin
    @Mikel

    It's just an unreflective r*ghtoid (but I repeat myself) take. Progressive high EHC countries like Sweden, Norway, Finland have pedaled back on child sex transition. It's highly dubious it will ever enjoy widespread acceptance.

    Child sex transition isn't a particularly appealing asset to invest in for an object that is thinking about how to front-run EHC. There are many much better bets, such as transhumanism, vegetarianism (anti-killing higher animals more specifically), women being socially pressured to adopt husband's surname, etc. are some examples.

    I addressed a point by AP before XYZ engaged me.

    I couldn't care less about this blog's ruins. It should have been put out of its misery long ago, if XYZ accelerates the process, more power to it.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Ivashka the fool, @Mr. XYZ, @Mikel, @AP, @A123

    Backing Kiev aggression is a core value of Leftoid extremism.

    Fortunately there is one candidate who openly opposes the SJW’s: (1)

    Watch: Trump Vows To “Sign A Law Prohibiting Child Sexual Mutilation In All 50 States”

    Addressing the Faith & Freedom Coalition convention in Georgia on Saturday, President Trump promised to sign a law if he is re-elected that would ban transgender surgeries on children.
    “Something else I find hard to believe that I have to even say,” Trump told the crowd, adding “It’s so ridiculous. It’s so horrible and so ridiculous. I will keep men out of women’s sports. And I will sign a law prohibiting child sexual mutilation in all 50 states. Prohibited.”

    Trump continued, “and on day one I will reinstate the Trump ban on transgenders in the military. Because a warrior should be focused on crushing American enemies, on being strong, on having the image of being strong.”

    “They have to be powerful. They have to be strong, especially when you see what’s happening in the world today, not catering to radical gender ideology,” he continued.



    Video Link

    Yet another solid reason for Americans to support Trump.

    #LetsGoBrandon 😇
    _____________________________

    (1) https://www.zerohedge.com/political/watch-trump-vows-sign-law-prohibiting-child-sexual-mutilation-all-50-states

    • Replies: @sudden death
    @A123


    Backing Kiev aggression is a core value of Leftoid extremism.
     
    Pure yeshitelling at its finest;)

    https://i.postimg.cc/NMVpwJP9/omali.jpg
  757. @Mikhail
    https://twitter.com/OlgaBazova/status/1674064694380843008

    Replies: @sudden death, @AP

    Funny, but it just shows that modern Bandera veneration has little to do with the historical movement

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @AP

    Bandera is a meme. Just like Stalin is.

    , @Mikhail
    @AP

    On par with Sorosian Brit based openDemocracy (oD) running Banderite like svidomite drivel, while warning about Russian and Serb traditional (as suggestively put) imperialist oppression. That venue (at last notice) has been also soft on Croat and Albanian version of Banderite svidos. RFE/RL, National Review among others have been kind of the same as well.

  758. @Mr. XYZ
    @Anatoly Karlin

    Is AP your buddy? What about German_reader? Or Razib Khan? Or any of the other commenters on here?

    As a side note, re: EHC: One could adopt a principle that EHC is presumptively right on a particular issue unless there is good evidence to the contrary. For HBD, such evidence exists (as well as your article on the false dichotomy between race denial and racism, which is an argument that can be embraced even from a liberal/social justice POV). For totally open borders, some such evidence exists (the failure of colonized peoples to permanently accept being an inferior caste in a hereditary caste system (which applies to Bryan Caplan's idea that we should have open borders but also a multi-generational denial of voting rights and social safety net access for immigrants and their descendants), as well as the failure to achieve full integration with certain groups in the West). (I do think that the evidence is more solid in favor of supporting much greater immigration liberalization, just not to fully open borders levels for the West.) For anti-natalism, such evidence exists because EHC anti-natalists are evolutionarily being selected against and because natalism, if done eugenically, can be a huge boost to society. But on the other stuff, EHC does strike me as being more likely to have reason relative to the proles. EHC is more pro-free speech relative to the proles, for instance.

    The issue with conquering unwilling peoples for their human capital would have, I would have thought, been more widely supported by EHC had this idea been more widely practiced in recent times. Yet countries generally frown on such a practice. For instance, the US could have conquered Canada, Australia, and New Zealand during WWI by allying with the Central Powers instead of the Entente (pre-USW) but chose not to do this because it didn't see a need for this. Likewise, even Nazi-era Germans (at least pre-Fall of France) would have probably balked at the idea of forcibly incorporating the Netherlands into Germany even though the Dutch and the Deutsch originated as one people. (Austria was a different case because Austrians themselves wanted such a union back in 1919; ditto for the Sudeten Germans.) If greater economies of scale were that vital, why wouldn't Japan and South Korea have put their past grievances behind them and have agreed to form a confederation between the two of them? This is what my general issue with pro-war Russian logic was about how Russia needs additional human capital and all of that. You want it? Then go and do what Israelis are doing! Else, just accept your status as a regional power benefitting you and instead seek to join the EU.

    Makes one wonder if EHC is also correct in general about Putin killing his critics even if they might be wrong about specific cases. If Israel was led by an authoritarian leader who was a former Mossad agent, and his critics ended up getting killed or dying in mysterious circumstances one by one, I'd also be very wary of him.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Anatoly Karlin

    Is AP your buddy? What about German_reader? Or Razib Khan? Or any of the other commenters on here?

    No. Even to the extent that a “thing” or “object” can be said to have anthropomorphic characteristics such as a capacity for friendships, it’s quite absurd to apply that label to other entities that hate it, despise it, or hold it in contempt.

    As a side note, re: EHC: One could adopt a principle that EHC is presumptively right on a particular issue unless there is good evidence to the contrary.

    Yes, that’s a good rule of thumb. One needs to make a distinction between EHC in the non-ironic sense, the bearers of the arguments that will win out long-term, and conformist mids who flock in their general direction, the types who are vegan for climate change reasons, or support Ukraine for incorrect (Ukraine as direct champion of progressive causes) and/or evil (Ukraine as based conservative ethno-state) reasons. For instance, NAFO fellas (founded by a Polish alt r*ghtoid) would be a good example of that.

    EHC is more pro-free speech relative to the proles, for instance.

    Correct. Support for freedom of speech goes up with IQ, including even for racists, even as racist sentiment diminishes to near zero amongst EHC.

    Likewise, even Nazi-era Germans (at least pre-Fall of France) would have probably balked at the idea of forcibly incorporating the Netherlands into Germany even though the Dutch and the Deutsch originated as one people.

    The Dutch as a wayward German people was widespread even in mid-19C Germany. I was amused when Friedrich List in The National System took an abrupt detour from economics to go on an extended rant about how the Netherlands was really a part of Germany and should be integrated into it.

    Makes one wonder if EHC is also correct in general about Putin killing his critics even if they might be wrong about specific cases.

    Yes. The evidence for that has become a great deal crisper in the past few years.

    What about making the killing proportional to mental ability? So, killing one pig for every 100 chickens? Would that work?

    That was my argument here: https://akarlin.com/animals/

    Also, what about giving unwilling parents (especially, but not only, unwilling *male* parents) a *unilateral* opt-out from paying child support?:

    I oppose that since the demand is an expression of male privilege.

    If anything m*noids need to pay reparations to womyn for thousands of years of patriarchy.

    BTW, re: Elite human capital: What do you make of Peter Singer’s (certainly elite human capital) support for (presumably painless) infanticide for disabled human infants, such as those with Down’s syndrome, up to one month after their birth?

    Yes, I support that. There are horrific stories around that: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2803834/I-wish-d-aborted-son-ve-spent-47-years-caring-s-shocking-admission-read-judge.html

    I think that, especially with the benefit of hindsight, Russia would have been better served creating a network state for Western dissident researchers.

    I lobbied the idea but nobody was interested. The only slightly interesting thing that came out of it was probably on the level of Noah Carl writing culture war type articles for RT.

    I myself was blacklisted from RT for a long time on account of the RationalWiki article (as I keep saying the memes are all American) and now I suppose it’s all irrelevant and for the best anyway.

    Kremlins are too low IQ and ideologically uncommitted to pursuing any such project.

    Steven Seagal, Sameera Khan, Jackson Hinkle, Scott Ritter – that is their intellectual level, the types with whom they feel comfortable corresponding with “on an even level”.

    Ultimately I guess that this further shows the bankruptcy of Russian nationalism: Instead of thinking bigger and trying to appeal to talented Westerners who are dissatisfied with the existing Western order, Russia essentially adopted a strategy similar to that of pre-Holocaust Germany, along with appealing to the lowest common denominator in the West with its talk about Satanism and the like. “Putin boomer” should become a total meme lol!

    Obviously one could quibble with the extent to which kremlins ever pursued the Russian nationalist program, but regardless, it’s all invalidated now anyway. I said before that the correct macro-historical interpretation of the Ukraine War is a last gasp Russian attempt to survive as a culturally autonomous civilization alongside the American Empire, China, and maybe India, but in retrospect given what it has revealed about its people and elite, the project was doomed from the start, even had Ukraine been overrun early on (it was a close run thing in the first month).

    As a side note, Yegor Prosvirnin’s tragic death and especially its sad and brutal manner could retroactively be viewed as an omen of sorts for the fate and future of Russian nationalism in general.

    Yes, I had similar thoughts.

    🌐🏳️‍🌈 won on Dec 27, 2021.

    I also disagree with you that Western rightoids should have supported Russia over Ukraine in the current war because a stronger Russia would not have prevented Woke Western liberals from cancelling Western rightoids later on, just like a much stronger Soviet Union did not prevent Western anti-Communists from cancelling those Western liberals who were deemed sympathetic to Communism, at least for a while.

    Getting a sovereign Great Power pole somewhat aligned with their least dysfunctional ideas (or potentially alignable at any rate) was realistically their one hope, forlorn as it was.

    I suppose it’s irrelevant one way or the other now, they’re going to continue getting crushed and humiliated at an accelerating pace. I’m going to derive some not inconsiderable Schadenfreude from seeing it happen to the John Johnson and LatW neocon types. To those r*ghtoids I like, my suggestion would be to jump ship before their remaining stocks of social capital goes to zero (that is, align with 🌐🏳️‍🌈, make a bet on the CPC, or on network states – or distribute across them to reduce risk).

    However the majority of them are just going to attack the messenger and seethe quietly in spiteful loserdom – many examples of that helpfully provisioned here – but that’s OK too.

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @Anatoly Karlin

    Tolik, do you think Yegor committed suicide, or has he been killed before the beginning of the SMO to avoid him pulling another S&P on the Kremlins ?

    And yeah, as I wrote three years ago, Kremlin Noviops have never felt anything other than pure contempt towards Russian Nationalists. They probably rejoice when they see them and the Ukrainian ones killing each others. Rus Fed is a country that went postnational even before Russian people reached the historical consciousness level of a nation.

    Anyway, what do you think of Prosvirnin's death, suicide or murder?

    If you prefer not answering, then it's also fine with me.

    Replies: @Anatoly Karlin

    , @Mr. XYZ
    @Anatoly Karlin


    No. Even to the extent that a “thing” or “object” can be said to have anthropomorphic characteristics such as a capacity for friendships, it’s quite absurd to apply that label to other entities that hate it, despise it, or hold it in contempt.
     
    You previously met up with AP once in real life, didn't you?

    Yes, that’s a good rule of thumb. One needs to make a distinction between EHC in the non-ironic sense, the bearers of the arguments that will win out long-term, and conformist mids who flock in their general direction, the types who are vegan for climate change reasons, or support Ukraine for incorrect (Ukraine as direct champion of progressive causes) and/or evil (Ukraine as based conservative ethno-state) reasons. For instance, NAFO fellas (founded by a Polish alt r*ghtoid) would be a good example of that.
     
    Yeah, I myself support Ukraine for national self-determination and greater economies of scale reasons. Ukraine is better off tying itself to a larger and more successful West/EU (much more elite science production and R & D spending) than to a smaller and less successful Russia. I think that it's the economies of scale (larger future West/EU) argument that is the most appealing to intelligent Westerners in explaining why they should care more about Russian aggression in Ukraine relative to some aggression in the developing world (which doesn't affect the US's oil supplies or whatever). That, and the fact that they view Ukrainians as more culturally similar to them than, say, Muslims or Ethiopians or Congolese are, even if the Sovok influence has yet to be fully removed from Ukraine, though Ukraine is thankfully working on it.

    Correct. Support for freedom of speech goes up with IQ, including even for racists, even as racist sentiment diminishes to near zero amongst EHC.
     
    Yep. I suspect that it's also EHC that's most likely to support BOTH flag burning AND Charlie Hebdo cartoons, including those that ridicule Islam and/or Muslims. Though that's just a hunch on my own part. The duller left could only support flag burning while the duller right could only support "Islamophobic" speech.

    The Dutch as a wayward German people was widespread even in mid-19C Germany. I was amused when Friedrich List in The National System took an abrupt detour from economics to go on an extended rant about how the Netherlands was really a part of Germany and should be integrated into it.
     
    Thanks; I should go and check it out!

    Yes. The evidence for that has become a great deal crisper in the past few years.
     
    Thanks!

    That was my argument here: https://akarlin.com/animals/
     
    Yeah, in that article, you pointed out that, on the net, killing chickens causes almost as much suffering as killing pigs does since for every pig killed, there are dozens of chickens killed, so even though chickens are considerably duller than pigs, it almost evens out in the end.

    I personally rarely (but not never) eat pork, partly for ethical reasons and partly for health reasons. I don't eat all that much beef either, for health reasons. I prefer chicken and fish, including chicken sausages, as well as plant-based patties. And of course a lot of veggies. My weight situation (200 pounds/almost 100 kilograms and exactly 6 feet/1.83 meters tall) is better than it was before. But I'm also currently taking Topiramate in order to curb my excess hunger, and it works great in this regard, actually!

    I oppose that since the demand is an expression of male privilege.

    If anything m*noids need to pay reparations to womyn for thousands of years of patriarchy.
     
    I'm open to sex-based affirmative action for women just so long as trans women as excluded so that men can't identify as trans women in order to game the system. (Though I have an extremely smart extremely close female family member who doesn't need sex-based affirmative action to get ahead. Still, it would be nice for her to have in any case, just as a backup option.)

    That said, though, my proposal for a unilateral child support opt-out above would, as a formal matter, have benefitted both genders. In practice, it would have benefitted men more because they lack the unilateral option of abortion, but women, especially those women who consider abortion to be immoral but don't feel the same way about unilaterally opting-out of paying child support, would also benefit from this proposal of mine. So, my proposal here is not misogynistic or anti-woman but rather meant to benefit everyone. A UBI (which you support) could help provide for the children who are unsupported by their non-custodial parents, if this UBI will actually sufficiently cover children as well.

    Yes, I support that. There are horrific stories around that: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2803834/I-wish-d-aborted-son-ve-spent-47-years-caring-s-shocking-admission-read-judge.html
     
    Yeah, if pro-lifers feel so strongly about this, then they should be very welcome to personally adopt all of the Down's syndrome and other disabled human infants who are unwanted by their biological parents. I don't consider painless elective infanticide to morally be as bad as killing older humans (even toddlers) since human infants don't actually have a conscious desire to live or an understanding of death yet. And with disabled infants, Singer's case is easier since AFAIK they are harder to get adopted relative to healthy infants because adoptive parents generally don't want disabled infants, especially if their disability is serious.

    I lobbied the idea but nobody was interested. The only slightly interesting thing that came out of it was probably on the level of Noah Carl writing culture war type articles for RT.

    I myself was blacklisted from RT for a long time on account of the RationalWiki article (as I keep saying the memes are all American) and now I suppose it’s all irrelevant and for the best anyway.

    Kremlins are too low IQ and ideologically uncommitted to pursuing any such project.

    Steven Seagal, Sameera Khan, Jackson Hinkle, Scott Ritter – that is their intellectual level, the types with whom they feel comfortable corresponding with “on an even level”.
     
    The "Kremlin boomers" meme strikes again lol! ;)

    Obviously one could quibble with the extent to which kremlins ever pursued the Russian nationalist program, but regardless, it’s all invalidated now anyway. I said before that the correct macro-historical interpretation of the Ukraine War is a last gasp Russian attempt to survive as a culturally autonomous civilization alongside the American Empire, China, and maybe India, but in retrospect given what it has revealed about its people and elite, the project was doomed from the start, even had Ukraine been overrun early on (it was a close run thing in the first month).
     
    Yes, that is correct. 2022-2023 for Russia was the equivalent of WWII for Germany, Italy, and Japan. Ironically, Germany, Italy, and Japan are all more accomplished nowadays than Russia is, at least in regards to elite science production and R & D spending, even though they are currently American vassals from a Russian perspective whereas Russia itself is not.

    As a side note, another bad omen in regards to this was when the Kremlin had eight years to turn the Donbass into a shining beacon of the Russian World and instead turned it into a dystopian dump. Transnistria for that matter isn't all that impressive either.

    Yes, I had similar thoughts.
     
    Thanks! It's very sad that he died. The only good thing that can be said about his death is that he maintained his innocence and did not get to tarnish his reputation by supporting Russia's 2022 Ukraine invasion.

    Getting a sovereign Great Power pole somewhat aligned with their least dysfunctional ideas (or potentially alignable at any rate) was realistically their one hope, forlorn as it was.

     

    Please keep in mind, though, that Russia was hardly unequivocally on their side. After all, I don't see very many Russians talking about race and IQ, and Russia is also known as having a notoriously soft spot towards Islam:

    https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2020/10/29/charlie-hebdo-could-not-exist-in-russia-kremlin-a71900

    But even ignoring all of that, these rightoids actually did aim to make a smart move in the sense that by supporting Ukraine, they aimed to win over the entire EU, a much larger and more successful confederation, over to the nationalist cause in due time. This is actually still the logic of people like AP, IIRC. The logic is that infusing the EU with a couple dozen nationalistic Ukrainians would strengthen the nationalist cause in the EU parliament, et cetera, along with possibly a strengthening of Pan-European unity and nationalism as a result of Europe supporting Ukraine in its fight to defend itself against aggressive Caucasian and/or Asiatic Chechens and Buryats. Maybe the EU can't be won over to the nationalistic cause, though it's far from clear since nationalists do appear to be gaining strengthen even in some Western European countries: Italy (Giorgia Meloni), France (Le Pen's father got less than 20% in 2002 but his daughter got over 40% in 2022, though I do wish that there was a prominent French/European nationalist politician who was also pro-Ukraine), Sweden (Sweden Democrats are the kingmakers there), et cetera. But still, banking on winning over the EU, even if it will be a losing gamble, strikes me as being a better deal than banking on a much less populous and less influential Russia. A Greater Russia would have probably had less global influence than a hypothetical confederation of Japan and South Korea, and I doubt that a Japanese-SouKor confederation could have actually won over the West to the nationalist cause.

    I suppose it’s irrelevant one way or the other now, they’re going to continue getting crushed and humiliated at an accelerating pace. I’m going to derive some not inconsiderable Schadenfreude from seeing it happen to the John Johnson and LatW neocon types. To those r*ghtoids I like, my suggestion would be to jump ship before their remaining stocks of social capital goes to zero (that is, align with 🌐🏳️‍🌈, make a bet on the CPC, or on network states – or distribute across them to reduce risk).
     
    What exactly makes you think that LatW (who is a woman, BTW) is a neocon? I don't see her ever mentioning that she supported a Western or Russian war with China, for instance. She does support the Free Russia Legion but even I myself wonder at this point in time whether they would do a better job governing Russia than Putin would. Those are the kinds of Russian nationalists that Ukrainians and other Intermarium peoples actually like, after all. As well as that Westerners either like or tolerate.

    However the majority of them are just going to attack the messenger and seethe quietly in spiteful loserdom – many examples of that helpfully provisioned here – but that’s OK too.
     
    We'll see how things will go over time, I guess!

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @LatW, @Sean, @Anatoly Karlin

    , @Mr. XYZ
    @Anatoly Karlin

    BTW, you might be interested in this:

    US elite human capital even back in the late 1910s already believed that Crimea should belong to Ukraine:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Inquiry


    The Inquiry was a study group established in September 1917 by Woodrow Wilson to prepare materials for the peace negotiations following World War I. The group, composed of around 150 academics, was directed by the presidential adviser Edward House and supervised directly by the philosopher Sidney Mezes. The Heads of Research were Walter Lippmann and his successor Isaiah Bowman. The group first worked out of the New York Public Library but later worked from the offices of the American Geographical Society of New York once Bowman had joined the group.[1]

    Mezes's senior colleagues were the geographer Isaiah Bowman, the historian and librarian Archibald Cary Coolidge, the historian James Shotwell, and the lawyer David Hunter Miller.[1] Progressive confidants who were consulted on staffing but did not contribute directly to the administration or reports of the group included James Truslow Adams, Louis Brandeis, Abbott Lawrence Lowell, and Walter Weyl.

    Twenty-one members of The Inquiry, later integrated into the larger American Commission to Negotiate Peace, traveled to the Paris Peace Conference in January 1919[2] and accompanied Wilson aboard USS George Washington to France.

    Also included in the group were such academics as Paul Monroe, a professor of history at Columbia University and a key member of the Research Division who drew on his experience in the Philippines to assess the educational needs of developing areas such as Albania, Turkey, and Central Africa,[3] and Frank A. Golder, a history professor from Washington State University, who specialized in the diplomatic history of Russia and wrote papers on Ukraine, Lithuania, Poland, and Russia.[4]
     

    The Inquiry suggested that if it was possible for Russia to become a genuine federal and democratic state, the Baltic states (with the possible exception of Lithuania) and Ukraine should be encouraged to reunify with Russia because of the belief that it would best serve the economic interests of everyone involved.[9] Meanwhile, if the Bolsheviks maintained their control of Russia, the Inquiry suggested for the independence of the Baltic states and Ukraine to be recognized if a referendum on reunion with Russia was held in those territories at some future better time.[9] As for the borders of Ukraine, Latvia, and Estonia, the borders that were proposed for them were very similar to the borders that these countries ended up with after 1991. Indeed, the Inquiry even suggested that Crimea should be given to Ukraine.[10]
     
    https://archive.org/details/MyDiaryAtConferenceOfParis-Vol4/page/n243/mode/2up
  759. @A123
    @Anatoly Karlin

    Backing Kiev aggression is a core value of Leftoid extremism.

    Fortunately there is one candidate who openly opposes the SJW's: (1)


    Watch: Trump Vows To “Sign A Law Prohibiting Child Sexual Mutilation In All 50 States”

     

    Addressing the Faith & Freedom Coalition convention in Georgia on Saturday, President Trump promised to sign a law if he is re-elected that would ban transgender surgeries on children.
    “Something else I find hard to believe that I have to even say,” Trump told the crowd, adding “It’s so ridiculous. It’s so horrible and so ridiculous. I will keep men out of women’s sports. And I will sign a law prohibiting child sexual mutilation in all 50 states. Prohibited.”

    Trump continued, “and on day one I will reinstate the Trump ban on transgenders in the military. Because a warrior should be focused on crushing American enemies, on being strong, on having the image of being strong.”

    “They have to be powerful. They have to be strong, especially when you see what’s happening in the world today, not catering to radical gender ideology,” he continued.

    https://rumble.com/embed/v2tmjhk/

     

    Yet another solid reason for Americans to support Trump.

    #LetsGoBrandon 😇
    _____________________________

    (1) https://www.zerohedge.com/political/watch-trump-vows-sign-law-prohibiting-child-sexual-mutilation-all-50-states

    Replies: @sudden death

    Backing Kiev aggression is a core value of Leftoid extremism.

    Pure yeshitelling at its finest;)

  760. @AP
    @Anatoly Karlin


    Progressive high EHC countries like Sweden, Norway, Finland have pedaled back on child sex transition. It’s highly dubious it will ever enjoy widespread acceptance.
     
    Child sex transition seems to be the modern bizarre product of American Puritans, who are the native USA's EHC. Because of American soft power it was adopted elsewhere briefly but the other countries are indeed backing away from it. The Puritans will too, eventually.

    Replies: @Anatoly Karlin

    The elite (as distinct from EHC as I define it) approach is that child sex transition is bad, and most certainly not for their own children, but energetically signaling against it is low-brow and low-status, and something that should be left to r*ghtoids.

    There are many other examples of that, the most obvious one being race/IQ/crime, SJW’ism as class struggle broadly, etc.

  761. @Yevardian
    @German_reader

    Well, everything comes to an end eventually. You'll have to send it again.

    Dunno if Mr Unz has yet noticed Karlin's would-be-shocking (shockingly banal, maybe) "transition", but if he has, it might be a sign to close Karlin's legacy Open Threads down.
    Presumably that is "Its" goal in coming here.
    Final galaxybrain take: XYZ is actually Karlin's former (???) Oliver D Smith, reconciled again in 'neurodiversity', working with Karlin (notice the lack of posting limit?) to erase "Its" wrongthink past.

    @GermanReader

    Must have accidently deleted message when cleaning it out (I made that throwaway email specifically for signing up for BS promos etc.), so you'll have to send it again the @burner19482010@gmail

    Replies: @Anatoly Karlin

    It’s not surprising that a Holocaust “skeptic” and conspiracy purveyor has many interesting ideas about all sorts of things.

    I don’t have any moderation powers here, I lost them more than a year ago.

    • Replies: @Yevardian
    @Anatoly Karlin

    No more seriously meant than your latest "I am an Object" troll.
    Although if it is seriously meant, it only further highlights how your formative years of cosmopolitan rootlessness and lack of national idenity ultimately led to such mental illness. Not exactly a posterchild for "Open Borders".

    Norman Finkelstein is another such 'doubter', so I'm in fine company. In the same manner, I just don't think there's any profit in dragging it up.

    Replies: @LatW

  762. @Anatoly Karlin
    @Mr. XYZ


    Is AP your buddy? What about German_reader? Or Razib Khan? Or any of the other commenters on here?
     
    No. Even to the extent that a "thing" or "object" can be said to have anthropomorphic characteristics such as a capacity for friendships, it's quite absurd to apply that label to other entities that hate it, despise it, or hold it in contempt.

    As a side note, re: EHC: One could adopt a principle that EHC is presumptively right on a particular issue unless there is good evidence to the contrary.
     
    Yes, that's a good rule of thumb. One needs to make a distinction between EHC in the non-ironic sense, the bearers of the arguments that will win out long-term, and conformist mids who flock in their general direction, the types who are vegan for climate change reasons, or support Ukraine for incorrect (Ukraine as direct champion of progressive causes) and/or evil (Ukraine as based conservative ethno-state) reasons. For instance, NAFO fellas (founded by a Polish alt r*ghtoid) would be a good example of that.

    EHC is more pro-free speech relative to the proles, for instance.
     
    Correct. Support for freedom of speech goes up with IQ, including even for racists, even as racist sentiment diminishes to near zero amongst EHC.

    Likewise, even Nazi-era Germans (at least pre-Fall of France) would have probably balked at the idea of forcibly incorporating the Netherlands into Germany even though the Dutch and the Deutsch originated as one people.
     
    The Dutch as a wayward German people was widespread even in mid-19C Germany. I was amused when Friedrich List in The National System took an abrupt detour from economics to go on an extended rant about how the Netherlands was really a part of Germany and should be integrated into it.

    Makes one wonder if EHC is also correct in general about Putin killing his critics even if they might be wrong about specific cases.
     
    Yes. The evidence for that has become a great deal crisper in the past few years.

    What about making the killing proportional to mental ability? So, killing one pig for every 100 chickens? Would that work?
     
    That was my argument here: https://akarlin.com/animals/

    Also, what about giving unwilling parents (especially, but not only, unwilling *male* parents) a *unilateral* opt-out from paying child support?:
     
    I oppose that since the demand is an expression of male privilege.

    If anything m*noids need to pay reparations to womyn for thousands of years of patriarchy.

    BTW, re: Elite human capital: What do you make of Peter Singer’s (certainly elite human capital) support for (presumably painless) infanticide for disabled human infants, such as those with Down’s syndrome, up to one month after their birth?
     
    Yes, I support that. There are horrific stories around that: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2803834/I-wish-d-aborted-son-ve-spent-47-years-caring-s-shocking-admission-read-judge.html

    I think that, especially with the benefit of hindsight, Russia would have been better served creating a network state for Western dissident researchers.
     
    I lobbied the idea but nobody was interested. The only slightly interesting thing that came out of it was probably on the level of Noah Carl writing culture war type articles for RT.

    I myself was blacklisted from RT for a long time on account of the RationalWiki article (as I keep saying the memes are all American) and now I suppose it's all irrelevant and for the best anyway.

    Kremlins are too low IQ and ideologically uncommitted to pursuing any such project.

    Steven Seagal, Sameera Khan, Jackson Hinkle, Scott Ritter - that is their intellectual level, the types with whom they feel comfortable corresponding with "on an even level".

    Ultimately I guess that this further shows the bankruptcy of Russian nationalism: Instead of thinking bigger and trying to appeal to talented Westerners who are dissatisfied with the existing Western order, Russia essentially adopted a strategy similar to that of pre-Holocaust Germany, along with appealing to the lowest common denominator in the West with its talk about Satanism and the like. “Putin boomer” should become a total meme lol!
     
    Obviously one could quibble with the extent to which kremlins ever pursued the Russian nationalist program, but regardless, it's all invalidated now anyway. I said before that the correct macro-historical interpretation of the Ukraine War is a last gasp Russian attempt to survive as a culturally autonomous civilization alongside the American Empire, China, and maybe India, but in retrospect given what it has revealed about its people and elite, the project was doomed from the start, even had Ukraine been overrun early on (it was a close run thing in the first month).

    https://twitter.com/powerfultakes/status/1673083124144562186

    As a side note, Yegor Prosvirnin’s tragic death and especially its sad and brutal manner could retroactively be viewed as an omen of sorts for the fate and future of Russian nationalism in general.

     

    Yes, I had similar thoughts.

    https://twitter.com/powerfultakes/status/1590365612135845890

    🌐🏳️‍🌈 won on Dec 27, 2021.

    I also disagree with you that Western rightoids should have supported Russia over Ukraine in the current war because a stronger Russia would not have prevented Woke Western liberals from cancelling Western rightoids later on, just like a much stronger Soviet Union did not prevent Western anti-Communists from cancelling those Western liberals who were deemed sympathetic to Communism, at least for a while.
     
    Getting a sovereign Great Power pole somewhat aligned with their least dysfunctional ideas (or potentially alignable at any rate) was realistically their one hope, forlorn as it was.

    I suppose it's irrelevant one way or the other now, they're going to continue getting crushed and humiliated at an accelerating pace. I'm going to derive some not inconsiderable Schadenfreude from seeing it happen to the John Johnson and LatW neocon types. To those r*ghtoids I like, my suggestion would be to jump ship before their remaining stocks of social capital goes to zero (that is, align with 🌐🏳️‍🌈, make a bet on the CPC, or on network states - or distribute across them to reduce risk).

    However the majority of them are just going to attack the messenger and seethe quietly in spiteful loserdom - many examples of that helpfully provisioned here - but that's OK too.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Mr. XYZ, @Mr. XYZ

    Tolik, do you think Yegor committed suicide, or has he been killed before the beginning of the SMO to avoid him pulling another S&P on the Kremlins ?

    And yeah, as I wrote three years ago, Kremlin Noviops have never felt anything other than pure contempt towards Russian Nationalists. They probably rejoice when they see them and the Ukrainian ones killing each others. Rus Fed is a country that went postnational even before Russian people reached the historical consciousness level of a nation.

    Anyway, what do you think of Prosvirnin’s death, suicide or murder?

    If you prefer not answering, then it’s also fine with me.

    • Replies: @Anatoly Karlin
    @Ivashka the fool

    As I said before, I know with 100% certainty that it was a drug-induced suicide.

    You can read the investigation yourself: https://vk.com/@czartv-smert-egora-prosvirnina-rassledovanie-carskogo-televideniya

    Nobody in Prosvirnin's circle of family, friends, and close acquaintances (many of whom are strongly oppositionist) claims otherwise, including his widow and mother.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @Sher Singh, @Mr. XYZ

  763. @AP
    @Mikhail

    Funny, but it just shows that modern Bandera veneration has little to do with the historical movement

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Mikhail

    Bandera is a meme. Just like Stalin is.

  764. @Ivashka the fool
    @Anatoly Karlin

    Tolik, do you think Yegor committed suicide, or has he been killed before the beginning of the SMO to avoid him pulling another S&P on the Kremlins ?

    And yeah, as I wrote three years ago, Kremlin Noviops have never felt anything other than pure contempt towards Russian Nationalists. They probably rejoice when they see them and the Ukrainian ones killing each others. Rus Fed is a country that went postnational even before Russian people reached the historical consciousness level of a nation.

    Anyway, what do you think of Prosvirnin's death, suicide or murder?

    If you prefer not answering, then it's also fine with me.

    Replies: @Anatoly Karlin

    As I said before, I know with 100% certainty that it was a drug-induced suicide.

    You can read the investigation yourself: https://vk.com/@czartv-smert-egora-prosvirnina-rassledovanie-carskogo-televideniya

    Nobody in Prosvirnin’s circle of family, friends, and close acquaintances (many of whom are strongly oppositionist) claims otherwise, including his widow and mother.

    • Thanks: Ivashka the fool
    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @Anatoly Karlin

    Hello again Anatoly! I hope that your latest reincarnation doesn't include shedding your elevated status as a "pepperhead". We used to have some great conversations here on culinary subjects, and you even suggested on a couple of occasions that I look you up if ever in Moscow, that you'd show me around to some of the better restaurants. I'm curious to know whether you'd ever consider moving back somewhere to the West (the US?)? For the longest time you stood firm on remaining in Russia, and I actually lauded you for this, in contrast to all of the other "Russian patriots" that decided to remain patriots but at very distant destinations. If Russian nationalism doesn't matter anymore, I don't see you needing to lock yourself down to any one country anymore?

    And then there's the little thing about you actually censoring out a couple of my comments here just before you left? Very out of character for you, certainly looking back now that you're becoming a super free speech advocate and all. It looks like you've finally moved away from your past attachment to an anachronistic Triunism? All is forgiven, all is good - be well!

    Replies: @Mikhail, @Anatoly Karlin

    , @Sher Singh
    @Anatoly Karlin

    https://www.youtube.com/shorts/sRYD14PsggY


    https://twitter.com/shimul_23/status/1673731257140920320?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

    https://twitter.com/shimul_23/status/1673995536377184257?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

    https://twitter.com/shimul_23/status/1673899158879756288?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

    https://twitter.com/immortal_sn/status/1673917396229427202?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

    , @Mr. XYZ
    @Anatoly Karlin

    Off-topic, but in regards to this post of yours:

    "Reasonable thread on affirmative action. Elites with a stake in the success of the American project need all racial groups to feel invested in it. Allowing social mobility elevators (universities) to be dominated by Asian test-taking maximizers isn't optimal way to go about it."

    Why exactly can't economic-based affirmative action achieve the same goal? It would also be more useful at helping poorer minorities relative to race-based affirmative action, which might be more likely to help wealthier minorities.

    Also, by that logic, would you acknowledge that Jewish quotas can be justified (in the name of equity) if they are necessary to make gentile whites feel like they have a greater stake in the system, as in the late Soviet Union or in the early 20th century US and Eastern Europe?

    As a side note, this shows the total delusion of those open borders folks like Bryan Caplan who think that the West can do open borders while denying citizenship, voting rights, and social safety net access to immigrants and their descendants for an indefinite number of generations. Why exactly would immigrants and their descendants actually be willing to permanently tolerate this in any reasonably free and democratic country, after all?

  765. @sudden death
    @Mikhail

    Reminder that muh Nazi collaborator was imprisoned by Nazis for declaring Ukrainian independent state and spent nearly all the time under the bars when Nazi war with USSR was going on:


    Bandera was freed from prison in 1939 following the invasion of Poland, and moved to Kraków. He prepared the 1941 proclamation of the Ukrainian state, pledging to work with Nazi Germany after Germany invaded the Soviet Union on 22 June 1941. The Germans disapproved of the proclamation, and for his refusal to rescind the decree, Bandera was arrested by the Gestapo. He was released in 1944 by the Germans in hopes that he could fight the Soviet advance.
    ...................
    The Germans also barred Bandera from moving to newly conquered Lviv, limiting his residency to occupied Cracow. On 5 July, Bandera was placed under house arrest and later, as an honorary inmate in a Berlin prison. On 12 July, the prime minister of the newly formed Ukrainian National Government, Yaroslav Stetsko, was also arrested and taken to Berlin. Although released from custody on 14 July, both were required to stay in Berlin. The Germans closed OUN-B offices in Berlin and Vienna and on 15 September 1941 Bandera and leading OUN members were arrested by the Gestapo.

    By the end of 1941 relations between Nazi Germany and the OUN-B had soured to the point where a Nazi document dated 25 November 1941 stated that "the Bandera Movement is preparing a revolt in the Reichskommissariat which has as its ultimate aim the establishment of an independent Ukraine. All functionaries of the Bandera Movement must be arrested at once and, after thorough interrogation, are to be liquidated".

    In January 1942, Bandera was transferred to Sachsenhausen concentration camp's special prison cell building (Zellenbau) for high-profile political prisoners such as Horia Sima, the chancellor of Austria, Kurt von Schuschnigg or Stefan Grot-Rowecki  and was kept in special, comparatively comfortable detention.
     

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stepan_Bandera

    Replies: @Mikhail

    So the forces in his name killing thousands of Poles, Jews as well as Ukrainians and Russians not PC by OUN/UPA standards is somehow okay?

    • Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
    @Mikhail

    Enemy of my enemy is my friend fallacy.

    In this book:

    https://www.amazon.com/Interview-Wizard-Peter-J-Carroll/dp/1914153146/

    Peter Carroll cites long lived Crowley collaborator Gerald Yorke as being mystified that people made an icon out of Aleister Crowley in the 1970's because if any of them had ever met him they would have all been totally repulsed. He only had any magnetic attraction for the weirdest of the weirdest of the weirdest when he was alive.

    Replies: @Mikhail, @Another Polish Perspective

  766. @AP
    @Mikhail

    Funny, but it just shows that modern Bandera veneration has little to do with the historical movement

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Mikhail

    On par with Sorosian Brit based openDemocracy (oD) running Banderite like svidomite drivel, while warning about Russian and Serb traditional (as suggestively put) imperialist oppression. That venue (at last notice) has been also soft on Croat and Albanian version of Banderite svidos. RFE/RL, National Review among others have been kind of the same as well.

  767. Biden, If I recall correctly appeared on Oprah Winfrey in 2002-03 selling the policy of Regime Change and invasion of Iraq to all the dumb Hausfrau’s in Murka.

    “It’s clear that Putin is losing the war in Iraq.”

    War Monger loses track of which war he’s mongering. Probably even caught the verbal mistake there and decided not to correct his error. The President doesn’t even need to show up.

  768. @Mikel
    @Anatoly Karlin


    I couldn’t care less about this blog’s ruins. It should have been put out of its misery long ago,
     
    Considering it's part of the ruins of the Unz horrorshow and it functions without moderation, it's not so bad really. There are still some good brains left, though you've just put off two of the best. But it's funny how you've let Putin change your mind even on that issue. A year ago this blog should have disappeared because people here weren't rightist enough to appreciate the value of the triune project and now it should disappear because we're just a bunch of old fashioned "rightoids".

    I'm not really much of a rightist or nationalist myself but I'll take an advanced, functional nation state (say Reagan's US) over those ethereal network state projects any time of the day. Zuzalu is part of NATO, btw. If any of those elite humans (some of them clear freaks) that like gathering there ever dream of changing that status Stoltenberg will make sure to remind them who's the real elite. Reminds me of a guy who bought a small piece of the Great Salt Desert for $5,000 on ebay, went to live there and declared it an independent republic. You could go visit him through a dirt road and he would stamp your passport with the emblem of his republic. No authority ever bothered him. Why would they? Perhaps he even attracted some needed tourism to the nearby sleepy towns.

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard

    There was a guy on Less Wrong who had a remote place in Arizona with no utilities, solar panels, and wireless internet who was really into death. The logic cannot be proven wrong but it still is a tough sell.

  769. @Anatoly Karlin
    @Ivashka the fool

    As I said before, I know with 100% certainty that it was a drug-induced suicide.

    You can read the investigation yourself: https://vk.com/@czartv-smert-egora-prosvirnina-rassledovanie-carskogo-televideniya

    Nobody in Prosvirnin's circle of family, friends, and close acquaintances (many of whom are strongly oppositionist) claims otherwise, including his widow and mother.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @Sher Singh, @Mr. XYZ

    Hello again Anatoly! I hope that your latest reincarnation doesn’t include shedding your elevated status as a “pepperhead”. We used to have some great conversations here on culinary subjects, and you even suggested on a couple of occasions that I look you up if ever in Moscow, that you’d show me around to some of the better restaurants. I’m curious to know whether you’d ever consider moving back somewhere to the West (the US?)? For the longest time you stood firm on remaining in Russia, and I actually lauded you for this, in contrast to all of the other “Russian patriots” that decided to remain patriots but at very distant destinations. If Russian nationalism doesn’t matter anymore, I don’t see you needing to lock yourself down to any one country anymore?

    And then there’s the little thing about you actually censoring out a couple of my comments here just before you left? Very out of character for you, certainly looking back now that you’re becoming a super free speech advocate and all. It looks like you’ve finally moved away from your past attachment to an anachronistic Triunism? All is forgiven, all is good – be well!

    • Replies: @Mikhail
    @Mr. Hack


    I actually lauded you for this, in contrast to all of the other “Russian patriots” that decided to remain patriots but at very distant destinations.
     
    Never mind the many Ukrainian versions outside Ukraine.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

    , @Anatoly Karlin
    @Mr. Hack

    Thanks. Yes, and the offer still stands. I'm uninterested in decamping back to the US - it has some attractions as the Western imperial center, but price-to-quality ratio is horrendous for anyone who doesn't need to physically be there. I still like Russia from a purely price-to-benefits/culture perspective, with Moscow being my favorite city, so it will almost certainly remain my main "base" into the indefinite future. However, as I am again a derooted thing, digital nomadism makes a lot more sense for me.

    I no longer support triunism or any national mythologies or indeed nation-state. "Patriot" is close to "patsy" in the dictionary for a reason. EHC trends towards globalism and the collapse of borders.

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Beckow, @QCIC, @Mr. Hack, @Mr. XYZ, @PetrOldSack

  770. Is there no way to request an article on scihub that isn’t already on it?

    I want something from 2014, from a very niche journal, which does at least have some earlier content on scihub. Seems pretty old, so I don’t think it will be automatically updated.

    • Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
    @songbird

    https://www.reddit.com/r/Scholar/

  771. @Anatoly Karlin
    @Yevardian

    It's not surprising that a Holocaust "skeptic" and conspiracy purveyor has many interesting ideas about all sorts of things.

    I don't have any moderation powers here, I lost them more than a year ago.

    Replies: @Yevardian

    No more seriously meant than your latest “I am an Object” troll.
    Although if it is seriously meant, it only further highlights how your formative years of cosmopolitan rootlessness and lack of national idenity ultimately led to such mental illness. Not exactly a posterchild for “Open Borders”.

    Norman Finkelstein is another such ‘doubter’, so I’m in fine company. In the same manner, I just don’t think there’s any profit in dragging it up.

    • Replies: @LatW
    @Yevardian


    it only further highlights how your formative years of cosmopolitan rootlessness and lack of national idenity ultimately led to such mental illness. Not exactly a posterchild for “Open Borders”.
     
    You can't blame a child or a very young person for being taken out of their home environment because of circumstances. And then having been thrown into an environment which may or may not be welcoming or easy to adapt to. It is not easy on the child (and especially a teenager). Those circumstances at the time were not within the control of most individual families. Why chastise their children?

    Western Russophiles, on the other hand, many of them turned out light weight hypocrites who are good at warmongering, but are not real fighters (especially given how much there is to do in their home countries).

    Replies: @Wokechoke

  772. I suppose this poster is very old, but it almost makes me want to move to Alberta, utopian world of no poz on rats and rich in dino fossils.

    [MORE]

    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @songbird

    Tens of thousands of Ukrainian immigrants heard the call too, but it wasn't always a bed of roses.
    Buyer beware:

    https://thediscoverblog.files.wordpress.com/2017/05/c056088k.jpg


    The immigration of Ukrainian settlers and Barr colonists was just the beginning; thousands more settled in the Prairies, motivated by the promise of free land and a new life. Yet many did not succeed. Drawn by an idealized version of the West portrayed in the campaign, the newcomers were unprepared for the realities of their new home. However, those who did succeed changed society and helped shape the Prairies into what they are today.
     
    Some of my distant family were a part of this waive. It was really tough by all accounts. Some of the children and grandchildren of this hearty group ended up as movers and shakers in Edmonton and Calgary. I don't know what it's really like today.

    Replies: @Gerard1234

  773. @Mr. Hack
    @Anatoly Karlin

    Hello again Anatoly! I hope that your latest reincarnation doesn't include shedding your elevated status as a "pepperhead". We used to have some great conversations here on culinary subjects, and you even suggested on a couple of occasions that I look you up if ever in Moscow, that you'd show me around to some of the better restaurants. I'm curious to know whether you'd ever consider moving back somewhere to the West (the US?)? For the longest time you stood firm on remaining in Russia, and I actually lauded you for this, in contrast to all of the other "Russian patriots" that decided to remain patriots but at very distant destinations. If Russian nationalism doesn't matter anymore, I don't see you needing to lock yourself down to any one country anymore?

    And then there's the little thing about you actually censoring out a couple of my comments here just before you left? Very out of character for you, certainly looking back now that you're becoming a super free speech advocate and all. It looks like you've finally moved away from your past attachment to an anachronistic Triunism? All is forgiven, all is good - be well!

    Replies: @Mikhail, @Anatoly Karlin

    I actually lauded you for this, in contrast to all of the other “Russian patriots” that decided to remain patriots but at very distant destinations.

    Never mind the many Ukrainian versions outside Ukraine.

    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @Mikhail

    We always knew that they were the phoniest. :-)

    How about you Mickey, are you ready to follow in Karlin's footsteps and renounce Russian nationalism? I mean really, your brand of Whitist/Monarchist Russian nationalism for an urban New Yorker is about as strange as it gets. And to devote your whole life to this cause? Preposterous.

    Replies: @Mikhail

  774. @Mikhail
    @sudden death

    So the forces in his name killing thousands of Poles, Jews as well as Ukrainians and Russians not PC by OUN/UPA standards is somehow okay?

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard

    Enemy of my enemy is my friend fallacy.

    In this book:

    Peter Carroll cites long lived Crowley collaborator Gerald Yorke as being mystified that people made an icon out of Aleister Crowley in the 1970’s because if any of them had ever met him they would have all been totally repulsed. He only had any magnetic attraction for the weirdest of the weirdest of the weirdest when he was alive.

    • Thanks: Mikhail
    • Replies: @Mikhail
    @Emil Nikola Richard

    Westy establishment knows the creepy aspects of Prigozhin. Same with a good portion of the 1980s era Afghan "freedom fighters" and the svido factor in Kiev regime controlled Ukraine.

    On the other hand regarding the "enemy of my enemy is my friend" approach, Nazis like Rosenberg knew to keep Vlasov on a short leash. That only changed when WW II took a noticeable turn.

    , @Another Polish Perspective
    @Emil Nikola Richard

    Probably, there is this Somerset Maugham novel which depicts him as a sleazy weirdo with magnetic powers over women: "The Magician".

    https://www.amazon.com/Magician-W-Somerset-Maugham/dp/193464868X/

  775. @songbird
    Is there no way to request an article on scihub that isn't already on it?

    I want something from 2014, from a very niche journal, which does at least have some earlier content on scihub. Seems pretty old, so I don't think it will be automatically updated.

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard

    • Thanks: songbird
  776. dana
    @dana916
    The Turks gave their version of yesterday’s attack on Kramatorsk. The building of the hotel in Kramatorsk, where foreign mercenaries and volunteers are stationed, was subjected to Russian bombardment during daylight hours, the losses amounted to more than 100 people.

    The hotel housed a large number of former US soldiers, special forces and military personnel from various NATO countries, who, under the cover of volunteers, provided command and administrative support to Ukrainian forces in the region. There are fears that the number of victims will increase.

    In the evening, a similar attack was carried out in the center of Zaporozhye. It is not known whether an ammunition depot or military cargo was attacked.

    infantmilitario

    [MORE]
    https://twitter.com/

    dana916/status/1674083851667222530

  777. @Emil Nikola Richard
    @Mikhail

    Enemy of my enemy is my friend fallacy.

    In this book:

    https://www.amazon.com/Interview-Wizard-Peter-J-Carroll/dp/1914153146/

    Peter Carroll cites long lived Crowley collaborator Gerald Yorke as being mystified that people made an icon out of Aleister Crowley in the 1970's because if any of them had ever met him they would have all been totally repulsed. He only had any magnetic attraction for the weirdest of the weirdest of the weirdest when he was alive.

    Replies: @Mikhail, @Another Polish Perspective

    Westy establishment knows the creepy aspects of Prigozhin. Same with a good portion of the 1980s era Afghan “freedom fighters” and the svido factor in Kiev regime controlled Ukraine.

    On the other hand regarding the “enemy of my enemy is my friend” approach, Nazis like Rosenberg knew to keep Vlasov on a short leash. That only changed when WW II took a noticeable turn.

  778. @Mikhail
    @Mr. Hack


    I actually lauded you for this, in contrast to all of the other “Russian patriots” that decided to remain patriots but at very distant destinations.
     
    Never mind the many Ukrainian versions outside Ukraine.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

    We always knew that they were the phoniest. 🙂

    How about you Mickey, are you ready to follow in Karlin’s footsteps and renounce Russian nationalism? I mean really, your brand of Whitist/Monarchist Russian nationalism for an urban New Yorker is about as strange as it gets. And to devote your whole life to this cause? Preposterous.

    • LOL: Mikhail
    • Replies: @Mikhail
    @Mr. Hack

    The irony of projection.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8K2aww8xKcE

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

  779. @silviosilver
    @Dmitry


    When old people complain in Russia, it’s usually related to what is allowed in media, instead of what is allowed in real life.
     
    It's a perfectly valid distinction. Permission vs promotion. If I were "boss of America," despite my revulsion of the homosexual act, I'd happily permit it. Doesn't really bother me at all that it exists and I wouldn't waste any effort trying to stamp it out or penalize it. But why in the world promote it? Why celebrate it? Why elevate it to equal status with heterosexuality? Why kid ourselves that homosexuality, in and of itself, is some tremendous boon we should all be grateful to have in our lives?

    Replies: @Matra

    In his book On Genetic Interests your fellow Australian Frank Salter points out that no matter their proximate interests the ultimate genetic interests of homosexuals align with their co-ethnics. In the past homosexuals, at least those with talent, applied their energies to endeavours, often artistic, that added to their nation’s patrimony and therefore contributed to the future without having children. Now under American encouragement they are let loose, under their own flag no less, from all inherited ties. Having observed them – from afar, of course! – for decades I see a very malleable people once all constraints and restraints are removed being operated almost as if by joystick in a way that helps American hegemony by directing their energies against their own nations and traditions. Divide et impera. So far, the weaponisation of homosexuality has been fairly successful.

  780. @songbird
    I suppose this poster is very old, but it almost makes me want to move to Alberta, utopian world of no poz on rats and rich in dino fossils.
    https://twitter.com/cremieuxrecueil/status/1674267813870022659?s=20

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

    Tens of thousands of Ukrainian immigrants heard the call too, but it wasn’t always a bed of roses.
    Buyer beware:

    The immigration of Ukrainian settlers and Barr colonists was just the beginning; thousands more settled in the Prairies, motivated by the promise of free land and a new life. Yet many did not succeed. Drawn by an idealized version of the West portrayed in the campaign, the newcomers were unprepared for the realities of their new home. However, those who did succeed changed society and helped shape the Prairies into what they are today.

    Some of my distant family were a part of this waive. It was really tough by all accounts. Some of the children and grandchildren of this hearty group ended up as movers and shakers in Edmonton and Calgary. I don’t know what it’s really like today.

    • Thanks: songbird
    • Replies: @Gerard1234
    @Mr. Hack

    They never thought of , or called themselves "Ukrainians" you retarded paedophile, Hack.

    They never thought of the people living around the Dnieper as the same people as them, you retarded paedophile, Hack.

    I already mentioned about the lack of ANY Ukrainian place names, like there are in North America for plenty of Russian, Dutch, French, British, even Armenian diasporas. Because ukropism and Ukraine and Ukrainianism isn't real thing.....no places of settlement with their names.

    Replies: @AP

  781. @Mr. Hack
    @Mikhail

    We always knew that they were the phoniest. :-)

    How about you Mickey, are you ready to follow in Karlin's footsteps and renounce Russian nationalism? I mean really, your brand of Whitist/Monarchist Russian nationalism for an urban New Yorker is about as strange as it gets. And to devote your whole life to this cause? Preposterous.

    Replies: @Mikhail

    The irony of projection.

    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @Mikhail

    Is that a yes, or a no?...

    (How about you Mickey, are you ready to follow in Karlin’s footsteps and renounce Russian nationalism?)

  782. @Ivashka the fool
    @Emil Nikola Richard

    Where there's will, there's way. They'll have to find it.

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard

    That is a minimum content cliche.

    This is short but dense.

    https://roundingtheearth.substack.com/p/the-monetary-wars-part-iii

  783. @Ivashka the fool
    @LatW


    It’s only a matter where this becomes “political” and also how the ownership part is handled (taxes, properties).
     
    https://www.undp.org/sgtechcentre/smart-cities-1

    https://www.un.org/en/un-chronicle/blockchain-and-sustainable-growth

    https://www.un.org/development/desa/dpad/publication/world-economic-situation-and-prospects-august-2022-briefing-no-163/

    The answer is wherever, taken at the source.

    Replies: @LatW

    Re: Smart cities, digital currency, etc.

    Sure, these things are being laid out in these policy documents but I was actually wondering about it from the other side, not the side of how network states would be built (the EHC would easily figure out these practical details), I was wondering more about how the EHC who will be inclined to leave the nation-state (or the multi-culti state), how they would extricate themselves from that state – usually such things happen either through some kind of a consensus or through violent means. Obligations to the state (taxes owed, military service, all kinds of other administrative obligations) follow one where ever one goes in the world. I guess I’m just wondering about that moment when the EHC decide to bail, how exactly they will tell their original state to take a hike?

    There is some old school American right wing anarchist and libertarian literature out there on these topics (from the 1990s), but it’s always been viewed as “utopian”.

    Oh, and, btw, I wouldn’t put too much weight on the UN these days. Many of these large, old school orgs didn’t show themselves in a very flattering light during the dramatic events and humanitarian crises that have just transpired. So I wouldn’t expect them to be all that capable in carrying out their countless plans. Smart cities, etc., will mostly be done by private individuals, in collaboration with the local governments, not these UN type orgs.

    Btw, thanks for the giraffe heart video – very instructive. Not always easy to live by that in our dynamic age. I guess we should’ve all followed that after 1991.

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @LatW

    You misunderstood me.

    What I was referring to, was that once these policies implemented, there will be no way to not pay one's dues. It'll be taken at the source when the CBDC will be emitted through smart contract into one's account. So it won't matter where one pays one's taxes, the Central Banks will settle all the accounts just fine. It'll be all digital, strings of 111s and 000s emitted (and resorbed) at will by the TPTB.

    Given that it'll be directly attached to one's virtual identification, It'll be impossible to hide how much one is worth. And if one misbehaves, then one will be stripped of one's belongings. That makes a rebellion against the system impossible for anyone who is identified. That's why I wrote above that it is of vital importance for anyone who wants to develop independent network organizations, to get to be able to change one's digital identification at will. Otherwise, any autonomy is impossible.

    If they wouldn't be capable of being anonymous/switching identifications, then they won't be able to build these networks. It would be just a pipe dream, another LARP.


    Btw, thanks for the giraffe heart video – very instructive.
     
    I posted it as a joke, but if you want something seriously useful as a tool to achieve pacification of the negative aspects of our mind, look no further, here it is:

    https://youtu.be/lk2eKqhVouU

    Safe with most medications!

    😇

    Replies: @LatW

  784. Many of these large, old school orgs didn’t show themselves in a very flattering light during the dramatic events and humanitarian crises that have just transpired.

    First requirement is something similar to new Soviet man 2.0. The scum roaming the earth now could screw up any system. : (

  785. @Yevardian
    @Anatoly Karlin

    No more seriously meant than your latest "I am an Object" troll.
    Although if it is seriously meant, it only further highlights how your formative years of cosmopolitan rootlessness and lack of national idenity ultimately led to such mental illness. Not exactly a posterchild for "Open Borders".

    Norman Finkelstein is another such 'doubter', so I'm in fine company. In the same manner, I just don't think there's any profit in dragging it up.

    Replies: @LatW

    it only further highlights how your formative years of cosmopolitan rootlessness and lack of national idenity ultimately led to such mental illness. Not exactly a posterchild for “Open Borders”.

    You can’t blame a child or a very young person for being taken out of their home environment because of circumstances. And then having been thrown into an environment which may or may not be welcoming or easy to adapt to. It is not easy on the child (and especially a teenager). Those circumstances at the time were not within the control of most individual families. Why chastise their children?

    Western Russophiles, on the other hand, many of them turned out light weight hypocrites who are good at warmongering, but are not real fighters (especially given how much there is to do in their home countries).

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @LatW

    Western Europeans mostly get to wave and say "hello!" to waves of literal beggar-thy-neighbour Poles, Balts and Ukrainians.

  786. @Mikhail
    @Mr. Hack

    The irony of projection.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8K2aww8xKcE

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

    Is that a yes, or a no?…

    (How about you Mickey, are you ready to follow in Karlin’s footsteps and renounce Russian nationalism?)

  787. @Anatoly Karlin
    @Ivashka the fool

    As I said before, I know with 100% certainty that it was a drug-induced suicide.

    You can read the investigation yourself: https://vk.com/@czartv-smert-egora-prosvirnina-rassledovanie-carskogo-televideniya

    Nobody in Prosvirnin's circle of family, friends, and close acquaintances (many of whom are strongly oppositionist) claims otherwise, including his widow and mother.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @Sher Singh, @Mr. XYZ

  788. Oh, look. As predicted the other day, Unz is already publishing alternative versions of the “real” events last weekend in Russia:

    True Story of the “Mutiny” Begins to Emerge
    Paul Craig Roberts • June 29, 2023 • 300 Words
    https://www.unz.com/proberts/true-story-of-the-mutiny-begins-to-emerge/

    Though Ron himself may not be motivated enough to come up with his own alternative theory. We know that he gets his information on the Ukrainian war from McGregor, Ritter at al and these are unlikely to deviate much from the Kremlin line.

    However, even while following the events from what I consider more or less reputable sources, it was impossible to avoid coming across kooky comments about that not being the way a helicopter falls to the ground, etc so I don’t think Unz’s authors will let such a juicy story as Prigo’s rebellion pass without writing half a dozen conspiracy stories.

    • Agree: Mr. Hack
  789. @Anatoly Karlin
    @Mr. XYZ


    Is AP your buddy? What about German_reader? Or Razib Khan? Or any of the other commenters on here?
     
    No. Even to the extent that a "thing" or "object" can be said to have anthropomorphic characteristics such as a capacity for friendships, it's quite absurd to apply that label to other entities that hate it, despise it, or hold it in contempt.

    As a side note, re: EHC: One could adopt a principle that EHC is presumptively right on a particular issue unless there is good evidence to the contrary.
     
    Yes, that's a good rule of thumb. One needs to make a distinction between EHC in the non-ironic sense, the bearers of the arguments that will win out long-term, and conformist mids who flock in their general direction, the types who are vegan for climate change reasons, or support Ukraine for incorrect (Ukraine as direct champion of progressive causes) and/or evil (Ukraine as based conservative ethno-state) reasons. For instance, NAFO fellas (founded by a Polish alt r*ghtoid) would be a good example of that.

    EHC is more pro-free speech relative to the proles, for instance.
     
    Correct. Support for freedom of speech goes up with IQ, including even for racists, even as racist sentiment diminishes to near zero amongst EHC.

    Likewise, even Nazi-era Germans (at least pre-Fall of France) would have probably balked at the idea of forcibly incorporating the Netherlands into Germany even though the Dutch and the Deutsch originated as one people.
     
    The Dutch as a wayward German people was widespread even in mid-19C Germany. I was amused when Friedrich List in The National System took an abrupt detour from economics to go on an extended rant about how the Netherlands was really a part of Germany and should be integrated into it.

    Makes one wonder if EHC is also correct in general about Putin killing his critics even if they might be wrong about specific cases.
     
    Yes. The evidence for that has become a great deal crisper in the past few years.

    What about making the killing proportional to mental ability? So, killing one pig for every 100 chickens? Would that work?
     
    That was my argument here: https://akarlin.com/animals/

    Also, what about giving unwilling parents (especially, but not only, unwilling *male* parents) a *unilateral* opt-out from paying child support?:
     
    I oppose that since the demand is an expression of male privilege.

    If anything m*noids need to pay reparations to womyn for thousands of years of patriarchy.

    BTW, re: Elite human capital: What do you make of Peter Singer’s (certainly elite human capital) support for (presumably painless) infanticide for disabled human infants, such as those with Down’s syndrome, up to one month after their birth?
     
    Yes, I support that. There are horrific stories around that: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2803834/I-wish-d-aborted-son-ve-spent-47-years-caring-s-shocking-admission-read-judge.html

    I think that, especially with the benefit of hindsight, Russia would have been better served creating a network state for Western dissident researchers.
     
    I lobbied the idea but nobody was interested. The only slightly interesting thing that came out of it was probably on the level of Noah Carl writing culture war type articles for RT.

    I myself was blacklisted from RT for a long time on account of the RationalWiki article (as I keep saying the memes are all American) and now I suppose it's all irrelevant and for the best anyway.

    Kremlins are too low IQ and ideologically uncommitted to pursuing any such project.

    Steven Seagal, Sameera Khan, Jackson Hinkle, Scott Ritter - that is their intellectual level, the types with whom they feel comfortable corresponding with "on an even level".

    Ultimately I guess that this further shows the bankruptcy of Russian nationalism: Instead of thinking bigger and trying to appeal to talented Westerners who are dissatisfied with the existing Western order, Russia essentially adopted a strategy similar to that of pre-Holocaust Germany, along with appealing to the lowest common denominator in the West with its talk about Satanism and the like. “Putin boomer” should become a total meme lol!
     
    Obviously one could quibble with the extent to which kremlins ever pursued the Russian nationalist program, but regardless, it's all invalidated now anyway. I said before that the correct macro-historical interpretation of the Ukraine War is a last gasp Russian attempt to survive as a culturally autonomous civilization alongside the American Empire, China, and maybe India, but in retrospect given what it has revealed about its people and elite, the project was doomed from the start, even had Ukraine been overrun early on (it was a close run thing in the first month).

    https://twitter.com/powerfultakes/status/1673083124144562186

    As a side note, Yegor Prosvirnin’s tragic death and especially its sad and brutal manner could retroactively be viewed as an omen of sorts for the fate and future of Russian nationalism in general.

     

    Yes, I had similar thoughts.

    https://twitter.com/powerfultakes/status/1590365612135845890

    🌐🏳️‍🌈 won on Dec 27, 2021.

    I also disagree with you that Western rightoids should have supported Russia over Ukraine in the current war because a stronger Russia would not have prevented Woke Western liberals from cancelling Western rightoids later on, just like a much stronger Soviet Union did not prevent Western anti-Communists from cancelling those Western liberals who were deemed sympathetic to Communism, at least for a while.
     
    Getting a sovereign Great Power pole somewhat aligned with their least dysfunctional ideas (or potentially alignable at any rate) was realistically their one hope, forlorn as it was.

    I suppose it's irrelevant one way or the other now, they're going to continue getting crushed and humiliated at an accelerating pace. I'm going to derive some not inconsiderable Schadenfreude from seeing it happen to the John Johnson and LatW neocon types. To those r*ghtoids I like, my suggestion would be to jump ship before their remaining stocks of social capital goes to zero (that is, align with 🌐🏳️‍🌈, make a bet on the CPC, or on network states - or distribute across them to reduce risk).

    However the majority of them are just going to attack the messenger and seethe quietly in spiteful loserdom - many examples of that helpfully provisioned here - but that's OK too.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Mr. XYZ, @Mr. XYZ

    No. Even to the extent that a “thing” or “object” can be said to have anthropomorphic characteristics such as a capacity for friendships, it’s quite absurd to apply that label to other entities that hate it, despise it, or hold it in contempt.

    You previously met up with AP once in real life, didn’t you?

    Yes, that’s a good rule of thumb. One needs to make a distinction between EHC in the non-ironic sense, the bearers of the arguments that will win out long-term, and conformist mids who flock in their general direction, the types who are vegan for climate change reasons, or support Ukraine for incorrect (Ukraine as direct champion of progressive causes) and/or evil (Ukraine as based conservative ethno-state) reasons. For instance, NAFO fellas (founded by a Polish alt r*ghtoid) would be a good example of that.

    Yeah, I myself support Ukraine for national self-determination and greater economies of scale reasons. Ukraine is better off tying itself to a larger and more successful West/EU (much more elite science production and R & D spending) than to a smaller and less successful Russia. I think that it’s the economies of scale (larger future West/EU) argument that is the most appealing to intelligent Westerners in explaining why they should care more about Russian aggression in Ukraine relative to some aggression in the developing world (which doesn’t affect the US’s oil supplies or whatever). That, and the fact that they view Ukrainians as more culturally similar to them than, say, Muslims or Ethiopians or Congolese are, even if the Sovok influence has yet to be fully removed from Ukraine, though Ukraine is thankfully working on it.

    Correct. Support for freedom of speech goes up with IQ, including even for racists, even as racist sentiment diminishes to near zero amongst EHC.

    Yep. I suspect that it’s also EHC that’s most likely to support BOTH flag burning AND Charlie Hebdo cartoons, including those that ridicule Islam and/or Muslims. Though that’s just a hunch on my own part. The duller left could only support flag burning while the duller right could only support “Islamophobic” speech.

    The Dutch as a wayward German people was widespread even in mid-19C Germany. I was amused when Friedrich List in The National System took an abrupt detour from economics to go on an extended rant about how the Netherlands was really a part of Germany and should be integrated into it.

    Thanks; I should go and check it out!

    Yes. The evidence for that has become a great deal crisper in the past few years.

    Thanks!

    That was my argument here: https://akarlin.com/animals/

    Yeah, in that article, you pointed out that, on the net, killing chickens causes almost as much suffering as killing pigs does since for every pig killed, there are dozens of chickens killed, so even though chickens are considerably duller than pigs, it almost evens out in the end.

    I personally rarely (but not never) eat pork, partly for ethical reasons and partly for health reasons. I don’t eat all that much beef either, for health reasons. I prefer chicken and fish, including chicken sausages, as well as plant-based patties. And of course a lot of veggies. My weight situation (200 pounds/almost 100 kilograms and exactly 6 feet/1.83 meters tall) is better than it was before. But I’m also currently taking Topiramate in order to curb my excess hunger, and it works great in this regard, actually!

    I oppose that since the demand is an expression of male privilege.

    If anything m*noids need to pay reparations to womyn for thousands of years of patriarchy.

    I’m open to sex-based affirmative action for women just so long as trans women as excluded so that men can’t identify as trans women in order to game the system. (Though I have an extremely smart extremely close female family member who doesn’t need sex-based affirmative action to get ahead. Still, it would be nice for her to have in any case, just as a backup option.)

    That said, though, my proposal for a unilateral child support opt-out above would, as a formal matter, have benefitted both genders. In practice, it would have benefitted men more because they lack the unilateral option of abortion, but women, especially those women who consider abortion to be immoral but don’t feel the same way about unilaterally opting-out of paying child support, would also benefit from this proposal of mine. So, my proposal here is not misogynistic or anti-woman but rather meant to benefit everyone. A UBI (which you support) could help provide for the children who are unsupported by their non-custodial parents, if this UBI will actually sufficiently cover children as well.

    Yes, I support that. There are horrific stories around that: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2803834/I-wish-d-aborted-son-ve-spent-47-years-caring-s-shocking-admission-read-judge.html

    Yeah, if pro-lifers feel so strongly about this, then they should be very welcome to personally adopt all of the Down’s syndrome and other disabled human infants who are unwanted by their biological parents. I don’t consider painless elective infanticide to morally be as bad as killing older humans (even toddlers) since human infants don’t actually have a conscious desire to live or an understanding of death yet. And with disabled infants, Singer’s case is easier since AFAIK they are harder to get adopted relative to healthy infants because adoptive parents generally don’t want disabled infants, especially if their disability is serious.

    I lobbied the idea but nobody was interested. The only slightly interesting thing that came out of it was probably on the level of Noah Carl writing culture war type articles for RT.

    I myself was blacklisted from RT for a long time on account of the RationalWiki article (as I keep saying the memes are all American) and now I suppose it’s all irrelevant and for the best anyway.

    Kremlins are too low IQ and ideologically uncommitted to pursuing any such project.

    Steven Seagal, Sameera Khan, Jackson Hinkle, Scott Ritter – that is their intellectual level, the types with whom they feel comfortable corresponding with “on an even level”.

    The “Kremlin boomers” meme strikes again lol! 😉

    Obviously one could quibble with the extent to which kremlins ever pursued the Russian nationalist program, but regardless, it’s all invalidated now anyway. I said before that the correct macro-historical interpretation of the Ukraine War is a last gasp Russian attempt to survive as a culturally autonomous civilization alongside the American Empire, China, and maybe India, but in retrospect given what it has revealed about its people and elite, the project was doomed from the start, even had Ukraine been overrun early on (it was a close run thing in the first month).

    Yes, that is correct. 2022-2023 for Russia was the equivalent of WWII for Germany, Italy, and Japan. Ironically, Germany, Italy, and Japan are all more accomplished nowadays than Russia is, at least in regards to elite science production and R & D spending, even though they are currently American vassals from a Russian perspective whereas Russia itself is not.

    As a side note, another bad omen in regards to this was when the Kremlin had eight years to turn the Donbass into a shining beacon of the Russian World and instead turned it into a dystopian dump. Transnistria for that matter isn’t all that impressive either.

    Yes, I had similar thoughts.

    Thanks! It’s very sad that he died. The only good thing that can be said about his death is that he maintained his innocence and did not get to tarnish his reputation by supporting Russia’s 2022 Ukraine invasion.

    Getting a sovereign Great Power pole somewhat aligned with their least dysfunctional ideas (or potentially alignable at any rate) was realistically their one hope, forlorn as it was.

    Please keep in mind, though, that Russia was hardly unequivocally on their side. After all, I don’t see very many Russians talking about race and IQ, and Russia is also known as having a notoriously soft spot towards Islam:

    https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2020/10/29/charlie-hebdo-could-not-exist-in-russia-kremlin-a71900

    But even ignoring all of that, these rightoids actually did aim to make a smart move in the sense that by supporting Ukraine, they aimed to win over the entire EU, a much larger and more successful confederation, over to the nationalist cause in due time. This is actually still the logic of people like AP, IIRC. The logic is that infusing the EU with a couple dozen nationalistic Ukrainians would strengthen the nationalist cause in the EU parliament, et cetera, along with possibly a strengthening of Pan-European unity and nationalism as a result of Europe supporting Ukraine in its fight to defend itself against aggressive Caucasian and/or Asiatic Chechens and Buryats. Maybe the EU can’t be won over to the nationalistic cause, though it’s far from clear since nationalists do appear to be gaining strengthen even in some Western European countries: Italy (Giorgia Meloni), France (Le Pen’s father got less than 20% in 2002 but his daughter got over 40% in 2022, though I do wish that there was a prominent French/European nationalist politician who was also pro-Ukraine), Sweden (Sweden Democrats are the kingmakers there), et cetera. But still, banking on winning over the EU, even if it will be a losing gamble, strikes me as being a better deal than banking on a much less populous and less influential Russia. A Greater Russia would have probably had less global influence than a hypothetical confederation of Japan and South Korea, and I doubt that a Japanese-SouKor confederation could have actually won over the West to the nationalist cause.

    I suppose it’s irrelevant one way or the other now, they’re going to continue getting crushed and humiliated at an accelerating pace. I’m going to derive some not inconsiderable Schadenfreude from seeing it happen to the John Johnson and LatW neocon types. To those r*ghtoids I like, my suggestion would be to jump ship before their remaining stocks of social capital goes to zero (that is, align with 🌐🏳️‍🌈, make a bet on the CPC, or on network states – or distribute across them to reduce risk).

    What exactly makes you think that LatW (who is a woman, BTW) is a neocon? I don’t see her ever mentioning that she supported a Western or Russian war with China, for instance. She does support the Free Russia Legion but even I myself wonder at this point in time whether they would do a better job governing Russia than Putin would. Those are the kinds of Russian nationalists that Ukrainians and other Intermarium peoples actually like, after all. As well as that Westerners either like or tolerate.

    However the majority of them are just going to attack the messenger and seethe quietly in spiteful loserdom – many examples of that helpfully provisioned here – but that’s OK too.

    We’ll see how things will go over time, I guess!

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @Mr. XYZ

    "The logic is that infusing the EU with a couple dozen *million* nationalistic Ukrainians would strengthen the nationalist cause in the EU parliament, et cetera, along with possibly a strengthening of Pan-European unity and nationalism as a result of Europe supporting Ukraine in its fight to defend itself against aggressive Caucasian and/or Asiatic Chechens and Buryats."

    (Corrected typo; previously forgot to include the word "million" here.)

    , @LatW
    @Mr. XYZ


    What exactly makes you think that LatW (who is a woman, BTW) is a neocon?
     
    I actually dislike certain neocons (as well as neo-liberals). But I support the internationally recognized borders of Ukraine. Granted, the Ukrainians themselves should've been more careful about governing these borders in some cases, but I am in no position to lecture them (since their situation is extremely complex).

    I don’t see her ever mentioning that she supported a Western or Russian war with China, for instance.
     
    The West should not put themselves in a situation where they have a confrontation with Russia and a confrontation in the Pacific. That is absolutely unacceptable and should be avoided at all costs. The West should not antagonize China but work to become less dependent on China and less entangled with China (granted, China needs the US more than the US needs China). The West is not doing this, which is harmful and dangerous long term, once again, the burden here is only being passed over to the next generation.

    China should not be antagonized, but China should also not be allowed to have a say over European affairs. They should be engaged in a neutrally amicable, but conservative and cautious way.

    What "Russian war with China" are you talking about? My position here is similar to the Russian ethnonats - do not give in to China, but stay on good terms. Care about your own first.

    As to Svoboda Rossii and RDK, I like these groups not because they are "shaking up Russia" or not even because they are armed and dangerous anti-Putinists who do not just talk, but act (unlike the Russian liberals (((some))) of whose morality I've recently began to question). I like them as people, the Legion because they are honest, egalitarian people, and the RDK because we are ideologically compatible. So I like them for other reasons that neocons might. And, mind you, the neocons do not "like them", they just view them as convenient in shaking up Russia. These guys, if they could, should get rid of both neocons and the Russian Noviops.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @A123, @YetAnotherAnon

    , @Sean
    @Mr. XYZ


    Yeah, I myself support Ukraine for national self-determination and greater economies of scale reasons. Ukraine is better off tying itself to a larger and more successful West/EU (much more elite science production and R & D spending) than to a smaller and less successful Russia. I think that it’s the economies of scale (larger future West/EU) argument that is the most appealing to intelligent Westerners in explaining why they should care more about Russian aggression in Ukraine
     
    That sounds like the ostensibly economic reform ideas of onetime designated successor to Yeltsin, Boris Nemtsov, but he had ulterior motives. According to America's Ambassador in Moscow Michael McFaul, in private Nemtsov advocated making Ukraine thoroughly western as a way of getting Putin removed from power. That was physicist Nemtsov's theory anyway. As far as I can see US moves over Ukraine have entrenched Putin in power and made him aware of the weakness of his conventional armed forces, damaged the prestige of his generals and their ability to restrain him. and attrited the army considerably, which makes him much more dependent on his thermonuclear arsenal--and able to be quick on the draw with it with little input from the Russian military chary of nuke first use.

    A Greater Russia would have probably had less global influence than a hypothetical confederation of Japan and South Korea
     

    The attempt to deny Russia any sphere of influence at all led to it crossing borders, annexing territory, and presenting US statecraft with a series of difficult problems, in addition to altering the terms of trade (paying more for raw materials), and causing all sorts of trouble in domestic politics such as Ukrainegate and Biden being unable to let Ukraine stop fighting without huge international loss of American prestige. The Western world would have been better off keeping its nose out of Ukraine, and ignored the geopolitical 'experts' who thought there was anything to be gained by:- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-WWdE1_RW0

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Mr. XYZ

    , @Anatoly Karlin
    @Mr. XYZ


    What exactly makes you think that LatW (who is a woman, BTW) is a neocon?
     
    I'm aware. I was delineating a broad category; LatW is a Nazi more specifically. (On average, womyn have far better political instincts than m*noids, but there are exceptions).

    The RDK are unironic Nazis, homophobes, and misogynists.

    https://antifascist-europe.org/russia/russian-volunteer-corps-denis-whiterex-is-back-in-business/

    No normal person would associate with the scum (the only defensible if cynical form of cooperation with them from an EHC perspective would be to "utilize" them as cannon fodder against stronger regressive forces and lock up any survivors under hate crimes charges when they outlive their usefulness).

    Replies: @S, @Mr. XYZ, @Mr. XYZ

  790. @Anatoly Karlin
    @Mr. XYZ


    Is AP your buddy? What about German_reader? Or Razib Khan? Or any of the other commenters on here?
     
    No. Even to the extent that a "thing" or "object" can be said to have anthropomorphic characteristics such as a capacity for friendships, it's quite absurd to apply that label to other entities that hate it, despise it, or hold it in contempt.

    As a side note, re: EHC: One could adopt a principle that EHC is presumptively right on a particular issue unless there is good evidence to the contrary.
     
    Yes, that's a good rule of thumb. One needs to make a distinction between EHC in the non-ironic sense, the bearers of the arguments that will win out long-term, and conformist mids who flock in their general direction, the types who are vegan for climate change reasons, or support Ukraine for incorrect (Ukraine as direct champion of progressive causes) and/or evil (Ukraine as based conservative ethno-state) reasons. For instance, NAFO fellas (founded by a Polish alt r*ghtoid) would be a good example of that.

    EHC is more pro-free speech relative to the proles, for instance.
     
    Correct. Support for freedom of speech goes up with IQ, including even for racists, even as racist sentiment diminishes to near zero amongst EHC.

    Likewise, even Nazi-era Germans (at least pre-Fall of France) would have probably balked at the idea of forcibly incorporating the Netherlands into Germany even though the Dutch and the Deutsch originated as one people.
     
    The Dutch as a wayward German people was widespread even in mid-19C Germany. I was amused when Friedrich List in The National System took an abrupt detour from economics to go on an extended rant about how the Netherlands was really a part of Germany and should be integrated into it.

    Makes one wonder if EHC is also correct in general about Putin killing his critics even if they might be wrong about specific cases.
     
    Yes. The evidence for that has become a great deal crisper in the past few years.

    What about making the killing proportional to mental ability? So, killing one pig for every 100 chickens? Would that work?
     
    That was my argument here: https://akarlin.com/animals/

    Also, what about giving unwilling parents (especially, but not only, unwilling *male* parents) a *unilateral* opt-out from paying child support?:
     
    I oppose that since the demand is an expression of male privilege.

    If anything m*noids need to pay reparations to womyn for thousands of years of patriarchy.

    BTW, re: Elite human capital: What do you make of Peter Singer’s (certainly elite human capital) support for (presumably painless) infanticide for disabled human infants, such as those with Down’s syndrome, up to one month after their birth?
     
    Yes, I support that. There are horrific stories around that: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2803834/I-wish-d-aborted-son-ve-spent-47-years-caring-s-shocking-admission-read-judge.html

    I think that, especially with the benefit of hindsight, Russia would have been better served creating a network state for Western dissident researchers.
     
    I lobbied the idea but nobody was interested. The only slightly interesting thing that came out of it was probably on the level of Noah Carl writing culture war type articles for RT.

    I myself was blacklisted from RT for a long time on account of the RationalWiki article (as I keep saying the memes are all American) and now I suppose it's all irrelevant and for the best anyway.

    Kremlins are too low IQ and ideologically uncommitted to pursuing any such project.

    Steven Seagal, Sameera Khan, Jackson Hinkle, Scott Ritter - that is their intellectual level, the types with whom they feel comfortable corresponding with "on an even level".

    Ultimately I guess that this further shows the bankruptcy of Russian nationalism: Instead of thinking bigger and trying to appeal to talented Westerners who are dissatisfied with the existing Western order, Russia essentially adopted a strategy similar to that of pre-Holocaust Germany, along with appealing to the lowest common denominator in the West with its talk about Satanism and the like. “Putin boomer” should become a total meme lol!
     
    Obviously one could quibble with the extent to which kremlins ever pursued the Russian nationalist program, but regardless, it's all invalidated now anyway. I said before that the correct macro-historical interpretation of the Ukraine War is a last gasp Russian attempt to survive as a culturally autonomous civilization alongside the American Empire, China, and maybe India, but in retrospect given what it has revealed about its people and elite, the project was doomed from the start, even had Ukraine been overrun early on (it was a close run thing in the first month).

    https://twitter.com/powerfultakes/status/1673083124144562186

    As a side note, Yegor Prosvirnin’s tragic death and especially its sad and brutal manner could retroactively be viewed as an omen of sorts for the fate and future of Russian nationalism in general.

     

    Yes, I had similar thoughts.

    https://twitter.com/powerfultakes/status/1590365612135845890

    🌐🏳️‍🌈 won on Dec 27, 2021.

    I also disagree with you that Western rightoids should have supported Russia over Ukraine in the current war because a stronger Russia would not have prevented Woke Western liberals from cancelling Western rightoids later on, just like a much stronger Soviet Union did not prevent Western anti-Communists from cancelling those Western liberals who were deemed sympathetic to Communism, at least for a while.
     
    Getting a sovereign Great Power pole somewhat aligned with their least dysfunctional ideas (or potentially alignable at any rate) was realistically their one hope, forlorn as it was.

    I suppose it's irrelevant one way or the other now, they're going to continue getting crushed and humiliated at an accelerating pace. I'm going to derive some not inconsiderable Schadenfreude from seeing it happen to the John Johnson and LatW neocon types. To those r*ghtoids I like, my suggestion would be to jump ship before their remaining stocks of social capital goes to zero (that is, align with 🌐🏳️‍🌈, make a bet on the CPC, or on network states - or distribute across them to reduce risk).

    However the majority of them are just going to attack the messenger and seethe quietly in spiteful loserdom - many examples of that helpfully provisioned here - but that's OK too.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Mr. XYZ, @Mr. XYZ

    BTW, you might be interested in this:

    US elite human capital even back in the late 1910s already believed that Crimea should belong to Ukraine:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Inquiry

    The Inquiry was a study group established in September 1917 by Woodrow Wilson to prepare materials for the peace negotiations following World War I. The group, composed of around 150 academics, was directed by the presidential adviser Edward House and supervised directly by the philosopher Sidney Mezes. The Heads of Research were Walter Lippmann and his successor Isaiah Bowman. The group first worked out of the New York Public Library but later worked from the offices of the American Geographical Society of New York once Bowman had joined the group.[1]

    Mezes’s senior colleagues were the geographer Isaiah Bowman, the historian and librarian Archibald Cary Coolidge, the historian James Shotwell, and the lawyer David Hunter Miller.[1] Progressive confidants who were consulted on staffing but did not contribute directly to the administration or reports of the group included James Truslow Adams, Louis Brandeis, Abbott Lawrence Lowell, and Walter Weyl.

    Twenty-one members of The Inquiry, later integrated into the larger American Commission to Negotiate Peace, traveled to the Paris Peace Conference in January 1919[2] and accompanied Wilson aboard USS George Washington to France.

    Also included in the group were such academics as Paul Monroe, a professor of history at Columbia University and a key member of the Research Division who drew on his experience in the Philippines to assess the educational needs of developing areas such as Albania, Turkey, and Central Africa,[3] and Frank A. Golder, a history professor from Washington State University, who specialized in the diplomatic history of Russia and wrote papers on Ukraine, Lithuania, Poland, and Russia.[4]

    The Inquiry suggested that if it was possible for Russia to become a genuine federal and democratic state, the Baltic states (with the possible exception of Lithuania) and Ukraine should be encouraged to reunify with Russia because of the belief that it would best serve the economic interests of everyone involved.[9] Meanwhile, if the Bolsheviks maintained their control of Russia, the Inquiry suggested for the independence of the Baltic states and Ukraine to be recognized if a referendum on reunion with Russia was held in those territories at some future better time.[9] As for the borders of Ukraine, Latvia, and Estonia, the borders that were proposed for them were very similar to the borders that these countries ended up with after 1991. Indeed, the Inquiry even suggested that Crimea should be given to Ukraine.[10]

    https://archive.org/details/MyDiaryAtConferenceOfParis-Vol4/page/n243/mode/2up

  791. @Mr. XYZ
    @Anatoly Karlin


    No. Even to the extent that a “thing” or “object” can be said to have anthropomorphic characteristics such as a capacity for friendships, it’s quite absurd to apply that label to other entities that hate it, despise it, or hold it in contempt.
     
    You previously met up with AP once in real life, didn't you?

    Yes, that’s a good rule of thumb. One needs to make a distinction between EHC in the non-ironic sense, the bearers of the arguments that will win out long-term, and conformist mids who flock in their general direction, the types who are vegan for climate change reasons, or support Ukraine for incorrect (Ukraine as direct champion of progressive causes) and/or evil (Ukraine as based conservative ethno-state) reasons. For instance, NAFO fellas (founded by a Polish alt r*ghtoid) would be a good example of that.
     
    Yeah, I myself support Ukraine for national self-determination and greater economies of scale reasons. Ukraine is better off tying itself to a larger and more successful West/EU (much more elite science production and R & D spending) than to a smaller and less successful Russia. I think that it's the economies of scale (larger future West/EU) argument that is the most appealing to intelligent Westerners in explaining why they should care more about Russian aggression in Ukraine relative to some aggression in the developing world (which doesn't affect the US's oil supplies or whatever). That, and the fact that they view Ukrainians as more culturally similar to them than, say, Muslims or Ethiopians or Congolese are, even if the Sovok influence has yet to be fully removed from Ukraine, though Ukraine is thankfully working on it.

    Correct. Support for freedom of speech goes up with IQ, including even for racists, even as racist sentiment diminishes to near zero amongst EHC.
     
    Yep. I suspect that it's also EHC that's most likely to support BOTH flag burning AND Charlie Hebdo cartoons, including those that ridicule Islam and/or Muslims. Though that's just a hunch on my own part. The duller left could only support flag burning while the duller right could only support "Islamophobic" speech.

    The Dutch as a wayward German people was widespread even in mid-19C Germany. I was amused when Friedrich List in The National System took an abrupt detour from economics to go on an extended rant about how the Netherlands was really a part of Germany and should be integrated into it.
     
    Thanks; I should go and check it out!

    Yes. The evidence for that has become a great deal crisper in the past few years.
     
    Thanks!

    That was my argument here: https://akarlin.com/animals/
     
    Yeah, in that article, you pointed out that, on the net, killing chickens causes almost as much suffering as killing pigs does since for every pig killed, there are dozens of chickens killed, so even though chickens are considerably duller than pigs, it almost evens out in the end.

    I personally rarely (but not never) eat pork, partly for ethical reasons and partly for health reasons. I don't eat all that much beef either, for health reasons. I prefer chicken and fish, including chicken sausages, as well as plant-based patties. And of course a lot of veggies. My weight situation (200 pounds/almost 100 kilograms and exactly 6 feet/1.83 meters tall) is better than it was before. But I'm also currently taking Topiramate in order to curb my excess hunger, and it works great in this regard, actually!

    I oppose that since the demand is an expression of male privilege.

    If anything m*noids need to pay reparations to womyn for thousands of years of patriarchy.
     
    I'm open to sex-based affirmative action for women just so long as trans women as excluded so that men can't identify as trans women in order to game the system. (Though I have an extremely smart extremely close female family member who doesn't need sex-based affirmative action to get ahead. Still, it would be nice for her to have in any case, just as a backup option.)

    That said, though, my proposal for a unilateral child support opt-out above would, as a formal matter, have benefitted both genders. In practice, it would have benefitted men more because they lack the unilateral option of abortion, but women, especially those women who consider abortion to be immoral but don't feel the same way about unilaterally opting-out of paying child support, would also benefit from this proposal of mine. So, my proposal here is not misogynistic or anti-woman but rather meant to benefit everyone. A UBI (which you support) could help provide for the children who are unsupported by their non-custodial parents, if this UBI will actually sufficiently cover children as well.

    Yes, I support that. There are horrific stories around that: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2803834/I-wish-d-aborted-son-ve-spent-47-years-caring-s-shocking-admission-read-judge.html
     
    Yeah, if pro-lifers feel so strongly about this, then they should be very welcome to personally adopt all of the Down's syndrome and other disabled human infants who are unwanted by their biological parents. I don't consider painless elective infanticide to morally be as bad as killing older humans (even toddlers) since human infants don't actually have a conscious desire to live or an understanding of death yet. And with disabled infants, Singer's case is easier since AFAIK they are harder to get adopted relative to healthy infants because adoptive parents generally don't want disabled infants, especially if their disability is serious.

    I lobbied the idea but nobody was interested. The only slightly interesting thing that came out of it was probably on the level of Noah Carl writing culture war type articles for RT.

    I myself was blacklisted from RT for a long time on account of the RationalWiki article (as I keep saying the memes are all American) and now I suppose it’s all irrelevant and for the best anyway.

    Kremlins are too low IQ and ideologically uncommitted to pursuing any such project.

    Steven Seagal, Sameera Khan, Jackson Hinkle, Scott Ritter – that is their intellectual level, the types with whom they feel comfortable corresponding with “on an even level”.
     
    The "Kremlin boomers" meme strikes again lol! ;)

    Obviously one could quibble with the extent to which kremlins ever pursued the Russian nationalist program, but regardless, it’s all invalidated now anyway. I said before that the correct macro-historical interpretation of the Ukraine War is a last gasp Russian attempt to survive as a culturally autonomous civilization alongside the American Empire, China, and maybe India, but in retrospect given what it has revealed about its people and elite, the project was doomed from the start, even had Ukraine been overrun early on (it was a close run thing in the first month).
     
    Yes, that is correct. 2022-2023 for Russia was the equivalent of WWII for Germany, Italy, and Japan. Ironically, Germany, Italy, and Japan are all more accomplished nowadays than Russia is, at least in regards to elite science production and R & D spending, even though they are currently American vassals from a Russian perspective whereas Russia itself is not.

    As a side note, another bad omen in regards to this was when the Kremlin had eight years to turn the Donbass into a shining beacon of the Russian World and instead turned it into a dystopian dump. Transnistria for that matter isn't all that impressive either.

    Yes, I had similar thoughts.
     
    Thanks! It's very sad that he died. The only good thing that can be said about his death is that he maintained his innocence and did not get to tarnish his reputation by supporting Russia's 2022 Ukraine invasion.

    Getting a sovereign Great Power pole somewhat aligned with their least dysfunctional ideas (or potentially alignable at any rate) was realistically their one hope, forlorn as it was.

     

    Please keep in mind, though, that Russia was hardly unequivocally on their side. After all, I don't see very many Russians talking about race and IQ, and Russia is also known as having a notoriously soft spot towards Islam:

    https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2020/10/29/charlie-hebdo-could-not-exist-in-russia-kremlin-a71900

    But even ignoring all of that, these rightoids actually did aim to make a smart move in the sense that by supporting Ukraine, they aimed to win over the entire EU, a much larger and more successful confederation, over to the nationalist cause in due time. This is actually still the logic of people like AP, IIRC. The logic is that infusing the EU with a couple dozen nationalistic Ukrainians would strengthen the nationalist cause in the EU parliament, et cetera, along with possibly a strengthening of Pan-European unity and nationalism as a result of Europe supporting Ukraine in its fight to defend itself against aggressive Caucasian and/or Asiatic Chechens and Buryats. Maybe the EU can't be won over to the nationalistic cause, though it's far from clear since nationalists do appear to be gaining strengthen even in some Western European countries: Italy (Giorgia Meloni), France (Le Pen's father got less than 20% in 2002 but his daughter got over 40% in 2022, though I do wish that there was a prominent French/European nationalist politician who was also pro-Ukraine), Sweden (Sweden Democrats are the kingmakers there), et cetera. But still, banking on winning over the EU, even if it will be a losing gamble, strikes me as being a better deal than banking on a much less populous and less influential Russia. A Greater Russia would have probably had less global influence than a hypothetical confederation of Japan and South Korea, and I doubt that a Japanese-SouKor confederation could have actually won over the West to the nationalist cause.

    I suppose it’s irrelevant one way or the other now, they’re going to continue getting crushed and humiliated at an accelerating pace. I’m going to derive some not inconsiderable Schadenfreude from seeing it happen to the John Johnson and LatW neocon types. To those r*ghtoids I like, my suggestion would be to jump ship before their remaining stocks of social capital goes to zero (that is, align with 🌐🏳️‍🌈, make a bet on the CPC, or on network states – or distribute across them to reduce risk).
     
    What exactly makes you think that LatW (who is a woman, BTW) is a neocon? I don't see her ever mentioning that she supported a Western or Russian war with China, for instance. She does support the Free Russia Legion but even I myself wonder at this point in time whether they would do a better job governing Russia than Putin would. Those are the kinds of Russian nationalists that Ukrainians and other Intermarium peoples actually like, after all. As well as that Westerners either like or tolerate.

    However the majority of them are just going to attack the messenger and seethe quietly in spiteful loserdom – many examples of that helpfully provisioned here – but that’s OK too.
     
    We'll see how things will go over time, I guess!

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @LatW, @Sean, @Anatoly Karlin

    “The logic is that infusing the EU with a couple dozen *million* nationalistic Ukrainians would strengthen the nationalist cause in the EU parliament, et cetera, along with possibly a strengthening of Pan-European unity and nationalism as a result of Europe supporting Ukraine in its fight to defend itself against aggressive Caucasian and/or Asiatic Chechens and Buryats.”

    (Corrected typo; previously forgot to include the word “million” here.)

  792. @Mr. XYZ
    @Anatoly Karlin


    No. Even to the extent that a “thing” or “object” can be said to have anthropomorphic characteristics such as a capacity for friendships, it’s quite absurd to apply that label to other entities that hate it, despise it, or hold it in contempt.
     
    You previously met up with AP once in real life, didn't you?

    Yes, that’s a good rule of thumb. One needs to make a distinction between EHC in the non-ironic sense, the bearers of the arguments that will win out long-term, and conformist mids who flock in their general direction, the types who are vegan for climate change reasons, or support Ukraine for incorrect (Ukraine as direct champion of progressive causes) and/or evil (Ukraine as based conservative ethno-state) reasons. For instance, NAFO fellas (founded by a Polish alt r*ghtoid) would be a good example of that.
     
    Yeah, I myself support Ukraine for national self-determination and greater economies of scale reasons. Ukraine is better off tying itself to a larger and more successful West/EU (much more elite science production and R & D spending) than to a smaller and less successful Russia. I think that it's the economies of scale (larger future West/EU) argument that is the most appealing to intelligent Westerners in explaining why they should care more about Russian aggression in Ukraine relative to some aggression in the developing world (which doesn't affect the US's oil supplies or whatever). That, and the fact that they view Ukrainians as more culturally similar to them than, say, Muslims or Ethiopians or Congolese are, even if the Sovok influence has yet to be fully removed from Ukraine, though Ukraine is thankfully working on it.

    Correct. Support for freedom of speech goes up with IQ, including even for racists, even as racist sentiment diminishes to near zero amongst EHC.
     
    Yep. I suspect that it's also EHC that's most likely to support BOTH flag burning AND Charlie Hebdo cartoons, including those that ridicule Islam and/or Muslims. Though that's just a hunch on my own part. The duller left could only support flag burning while the duller right could only support "Islamophobic" speech.

    The Dutch as a wayward German people was widespread even in mid-19C Germany. I was amused when Friedrich List in The National System took an abrupt detour from economics to go on an extended rant about how the Netherlands was really a part of Germany and should be integrated into it.
     
    Thanks; I should go and check it out!

    Yes. The evidence for that has become a great deal crisper in the past few years.
     
    Thanks!

    That was my argument here: https://akarlin.com/animals/
     
    Yeah, in that article, you pointed out that, on the net, killing chickens causes almost as much suffering as killing pigs does since for every pig killed, there are dozens of chickens killed, so even though chickens are considerably duller than pigs, it almost evens out in the end.

    I personally rarely (but not never) eat pork, partly for ethical reasons and partly for health reasons. I don't eat all that much beef either, for health reasons. I prefer chicken and fish, including chicken sausages, as well as plant-based patties. And of course a lot of veggies. My weight situation (200 pounds/almost 100 kilograms and exactly 6 feet/1.83 meters tall) is better than it was before. But I'm also currently taking Topiramate in order to curb my excess hunger, and it works great in this regard, actually!

    I oppose that since the demand is an expression of male privilege.

    If anything m*noids need to pay reparations to womyn for thousands of years of patriarchy.
     
    I'm open to sex-based affirmative action for women just so long as trans women as excluded so that men can't identify as trans women in order to game the system. (Though I have an extremely smart extremely close female family member who doesn't need sex-based affirmative action to get ahead. Still, it would be nice for her to have in any case, just as a backup option.)

    That said, though, my proposal for a unilateral child support opt-out above would, as a formal matter, have benefitted both genders. In practice, it would have benefitted men more because they lack the unilateral option of abortion, but women, especially those women who consider abortion to be immoral but don't feel the same way about unilaterally opting-out of paying child support, would also benefit from this proposal of mine. So, my proposal here is not misogynistic or anti-woman but rather meant to benefit everyone. A UBI (which you support) could help provide for the children who are unsupported by their non-custodial parents, if this UBI will actually sufficiently cover children as well.

    Yes, I support that. There are horrific stories around that: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2803834/I-wish-d-aborted-son-ve-spent-47-years-caring-s-shocking-admission-read-judge.html
     
    Yeah, if pro-lifers feel so strongly about this, then they should be very welcome to personally adopt all of the Down's syndrome and other disabled human infants who are unwanted by their biological parents. I don't consider painless elective infanticide to morally be as bad as killing older humans (even toddlers) since human infants don't actually have a conscious desire to live or an understanding of death yet. And with disabled infants, Singer's case is easier since AFAIK they are harder to get adopted relative to healthy infants because adoptive parents generally don't want disabled infants, especially if their disability is serious.

    I lobbied the idea but nobody was interested. The only slightly interesting thing that came out of it was probably on the level of Noah Carl writing culture war type articles for RT.

    I myself was blacklisted from RT for a long time on account of the RationalWiki article (as I keep saying the memes are all American) and now I suppose it’s all irrelevant and for the best anyway.

    Kremlins are too low IQ and ideologically uncommitted to pursuing any such project.

    Steven Seagal, Sameera Khan, Jackson Hinkle, Scott Ritter – that is their intellectual level, the types with whom they feel comfortable corresponding with “on an even level”.
     
    The "Kremlin boomers" meme strikes again lol! ;)

    Obviously one could quibble with the extent to which kremlins ever pursued the Russian nationalist program, but regardless, it’s all invalidated now anyway. I said before that the correct macro-historical interpretation of the Ukraine War is a last gasp Russian attempt to survive as a culturally autonomous civilization alongside the American Empire, China, and maybe India, but in retrospect given what it has revealed about its people and elite, the project was doomed from the start, even had Ukraine been overrun early on (it was a close run thing in the first month).
     
    Yes, that is correct. 2022-2023 for Russia was the equivalent of WWII for Germany, Italy, and Japan. Ironically, Germany, Italy, and Japan are all more accomplished nowadays than Russia is, at least in regards to elite science production and R & D spending, even though they are currently American vassals from a Russian perspective whereas Russia itself is not.

    As a side note, another bad omen in regards to this was when the Kremlin had eight years to turn the Donbass into a shining beacon of the Russian World and instead turned it into a dystopian dump. Transnistria for that matter isn't all that impressive either.

    Yes, I had similar thoughts.
     
    Thanks! It's very sad that he died. The only good thing that can be said about his death is that he maintained his innocence and did not get to tarnish his reputation by supporting Russia's 2022 Ukraine invasion.

    Getting a sovereign Great Power pole somewhat aligned with their least dysfunctional ideas (or potentially alignable at any rate) was realistically their one hope, forlorn as it was.

     

    Please keep in mind, though, that Russia was hardly unequivocally on their side. After all, I don't see very many Russians talking about race and IQ, and Russia is also known as having a notoriously soft spot towards Islam:

    https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2020/10/29/charlie-hebdo-could-not-exist-in-russia-kremlin-a71900

    But even ignoring all of that, these rightoids actually did aim to make a smart move in the sense that by supporting Ukraine, they aimed to win over the entire EU, a much larger and more successful confederation, over to the nationalist cause in due time. This is actually still the logic of people like AP, IIRC. The logic is that infusing the EU with a couple dozen nationalistic Ukrainians would strengthen the nationalist cause in the EU parliament, et cetera, along with possibly a strengthening of Pan-European unity and nationalism as a result of Europe supporting Ukraine in its fight to defend itself against aggressive Caucasian and/or Asiatic Chechens and Buryats. Maybe the EU can't be won over to the nationalistic cause, though it's far from clear since nationalists do appear to be gaining strengthen even in some Western European countries: Italy (Giorgia Meloni), France (Le Pen's father got less than 20% in 2002 but his daughter got over 40% in 2022, though I do wish that there was a prominent French/European nationalist politician who was also pro-Ukraine), Sweden (Sweden Democrats are the kingmakers there), et cetera. But still, banking on winning over the EU, even if it will be a losing gamble, strikes me as being a better deal than banking on a much less populous and less influential Russia. A Greater Russia would have probably had less global influence than a hypothetical confederation of Japan and South Korea, and I doubt that a Japanese-SouKor confederation could have actually won over the West to the nationalist cause.

    I suppose it’s irrelevant one way or the other now, they’re going to continue getting crushed and humiliated at an accelerating pace. I’m going to derive some not inconsiderable Schadenfreude from seeing it happen to the John Johnson and LatW neocon types. To those r*ghtoids I like, my suggestion would be to jump ship before their remaining stocks of social capital goes to zero (that is, align with 🌐🏳️‍🌈, make a bet on the CPC, or on network states – or distribute across them to reduce risk).
     
    What exactly makes you think that LatW (who is a woman, BTW) is a neocon? I don't see her ever mentioning that she supported a Western or Russian war with China, for instance. She does support the Free Russia Legion but even I myself wonder at this point in time whether they would do a better job governing Russia than Putin would. Those are the kinds of Russian nationalists that Ukrainians and other Intermarium peoples actually like, after all. As well as that Westerners either like or tolerate.

    However the majority of them are just going to attack the messenger and seethe quietly in spiteful loserdom – many examples of that helpfully provisioned here – but that’s OK too.
     
    We'll see how things will go over time, I guess!

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @LatW, @Sean, @Anatoly Karlin

    What exactly makes you think that LatW (who is a woman, BTW) is a neocon?

    I actually dislike certain neocons (as well as neo-liberals). But I support the internationally recognized borders of Ukraine. Granted, the Ukrainians themselves should’ve been more careful about governing these borders in some cases, but I am in no position to lecture them (since their situation is extremely complex).

    I don’t see her ever mentioning that she supported a Western or Russian war with China, for instance.

    The West should not put themselves in a situation where they have a confrontation with Russia and a confrontation in the Pacific. That is absolutely unacceptable and should be avoided at all costs. The West should not antagonize China but work to become less dependent on China and less entangled with China (granted, China needs the US more than the US needs China). The West is not doing this, which is harmful and dangerous long term, once again, the burden here is only being passed over to the next generation.

    China should not be antagonized, but China should also not be allowed to have a say over European affairs. They should be engaged in a neutrally amicable, but conservative and cautious way.

    What “Russian war with China” are you talking about? My position here is similar to the Russian ethnonats – do not give in to China, but stay on good terms. Care about your own first.

    As to Svoboda Rossii and RDK, I like these groups not because they are “shaking up Russia” or not even because they are armed and dangerous anti-Putinists who do not just talk, but act (unlike the Russian liberals (((some))) of whose morality I’ve recently began to question). I like them as people, the Legion because they are honest, egalitarian people, and the RDK because we are ideologically compatible. So I like them for other reasons that neocons might. And, mind you, the neocons do not “like them”, they just view them as convenient in shaking up Russia. These guys, if they could, should get rid of both neocons and the Russian Noviops.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @LatW


    What “Russian war with China” are you talking about? My position here is similar to Russian ethnonats – do not give in to China, but do not openly antagonize them. Care about your own first.
     
    Anatoly Karlin talks about how neocons wants to turn Russia against China, which could potentially lead to a war between the two of them down the line in the extraordinarily unlikely scenario that Russia ever took the neocons' bait here:

    https://www.unz.com/akarlin/kissinger-sees-sense-but-its-far-too-late/

    As to Svoboda Rossii and RDK, I like these groups not because they are “shaking up Russia” or not even because they are armed and dangerous anti-Putinists who do not just talk, but act (unlike the Russian liberals (((some))) of whose morality I’ve recently began to question). I like them as people, the Legion because they are honest, egalitarian people, and the RDK because we are ideologically compatible. So I like them for other reasons that neocons might. And, mind you, the neocons do not “like them”, they just view them as convenient in shaking up Russia. These guys, if they could, should get rid of both neocons and the Russian Noviops.
     
    That's actually a very good analysis of this situation, actually. These Russian groups, if smart, should seek to turn Russia into a mix of a futuristic and Amish-style peaceful, insular nation-state, unless of course they also want to seek EU membership for Russia, which this is also compatible with.

    A hyper-futuristic, peaceful, non-expansionist, non-aggressive, traditional Russia, with significantly higher fertility relative to right now in real life, and which is also in the EU--now *that's* a future to look forward to! It can even embrace bitcoin, radical life extension, and/or any other interesting niches.

    Replies: @LatW

    , @A123
    @LatW


    become less dependent on China and less entangled with China (granted, China needs the US more than the US needs China).
     
    Gradual decoupling and MAGA Reindustrialization are the keys to becoming disentangled from Asia and especially the CCP.

    West should not antagonize China
     
    Some of the necessary steps, such as ending CCP trade exploitation & IP theft, will be unpleasant for low quality Chinese leaders. I am not sure there is any way around that.

    Similarly, until chip disengagement is complete, the U.S. has to protect its access to Taiwan fab industry. The Taiwan Strait is 3 times wider than the English Channel and 12 times wider than the Gibraltar Straight. Does anyone complain about transiting those passages? Of course not. There is nothing 'provocative' about being in a huge body of water.


    I believe it’s unrealistic to turn China against Russia, or Russia against China.
     
    I concur.

    Improving relations between Christian Russia and Christian America will help reduce CCP influence on Russia. However, the Sino-Russian hydrocarbon trade is essential for both of them. They cannot be 'turned' on each other.

    Iran is a strategic competitor versus Russia. It might be possible to significantly increase the separation between them. Russia's best possible outcome in Syria includes displacing Khamenei's terrorists, so there is a potential upside for Russian enlightened self interest.

    PEACE 😇

    , @YetAnotherAnon
    @LatW

    "I support the internationally recognized borders of Ukraine"

    That sounds awfully like the Bishop in Elizabeth I's time (or was it in Bloody Mary's?) who swore that he was a dedicated supporter of "the religion set forth by Her Majesty".

    An unheroic outlook, but then he didn't fancy being a martyr, and who can blame him?

    "I support whatever it is that powerful people support".

    Replies: @LatW

  793. @LatW
    @Mr. XYZ


    What exactly makes you think that LatW (who is a woman, BTW) is a neocon?
     
    I actually dislike certain neocons (as well as neo-liberals). But I support the internationally recognized borders of Ukraine. Granted, the Ukrainians themselves should've been more careful about governing these borders in some cases, but I am in no position to lecture them (since their situation is extremely complex).

    I don’t see her ever mentioning that she supported a Western or Russian war with China, for instance.
     
    The West should not put themselves in a situation where they have a confrontation with Russia and a confrontation in the Pacific. That is absolutely unacceptable and should be avoided at all costs. The West should not antagonize China but work to become less dependent on China and less entangled with China (granted, China needs the US more than the US needs China). The West is not doing this, which is harmful and dangerous long term, once again, the burden here is only being passed over to the next generation.

    China should not be antagonized, but China should also not be allowed to have a say over European affairs. They should be engaged in a neutrally amicable, but conservative and cautious way.

    What "Russian war with China" are you talking about? My position here is similar to the Russian ethnonats - do not give in to China, but stay on good terms. Care about your own first.

    As to Svoboda Rossii and RDK, I like these groups not because they are "shaking up Russia" or not even because they are armed and dangerous anti-Putinists who do not just talk, but act (unlike the Russian liberals (((some))) of whose morality I've recently began to question). I like them as people, the Legion because they are honest, egalitarian people, and the RDK because we are ideologically compatible. So I like them for other reasons that neocons might. And, mind you, the neocons do not "like them", they just view them as convenient in shaking up Russia. These guys, if they could, should get rid of both neocons and the Russian Noviops.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @A123, @YetAnotherAnon

    What “Russian war with China” are you talking about? My position here is similar to Russian ethnonats – do not give in to China, but do not openly antagonize them. Care about your own first.

    Anatoly Karlin talks about how neocons wants to turn Russia against China, which could potentially lead to a war between the two of them down the line in the extraordinarily unlikely scenario that Russia ever took the neocons’ bait here:

    https://www.unz.com/akarlin/kissinger-sees-sense-but-its-far-too-late/

    As to Svoboda Rossii and RDK, I like these groups not because they are “shaking up Russia” or not even because they are armed and dangerous anti-Putinists who do not just talk, but act (unlike the Russian liberals (((some))) of whose morality I’ve recently began to question). I like them as people, the Legion because they are honest, egalitarian people, and the RDK because we are ideologically compatible. So I like them for other reasons that neocons might. And, mind you, the neocons do not “like them”, they just view them as convenient in shaking up Russia. These guys, if they could, should get rid of both neocons and the Russian Noviops.

    That’s actually a very good analysis of this situation, actually. These Russian groups, if smart, should seek to turn Russia into a mix of a futuristic and Amish-style peaceful, insular nation-state, unless of course they also want to seek EU membership for Russia, which this is also compatible with.

    A hyper-futuristic, peaceful, non-expansionist, non-aggressive, traditional Russia, with significantly higher fertility relative to right now in real life, and which is also in the EU–now *that’s* a future to look forward to! It can even embrace bitcoin, radical life extension, and/or any other interesting niches.

    • Replies: @LatW
    @Mr. XYZ

    I believe it's unrealistic to turn China against Russia, or Russia against China.

    As to the Russian freedom fighter groups, they are still in the minority - most Russians do not support their goals. The support is currently increasing, but they also have to share the nationalist niche with the likes of Prigo.

    As to radical life extension, they would probably not be against it per se, but these people want to live the natural way of life. They want to be heroes, not play gods.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @John Johnson

  794. Off-topic, but in regards to the EU specifically, having an almost Muslim-free zone in the Eastern part of the EU (specifically in Intermarium) allows Europeans to larp as traditional folks while still being a part of a world-power:

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @Mr. XYZ

    Malmo (handgrenade gangland Istanbul North) and Istanbul are the two choke points that make a mockery of this Muslim Free Zone guff. The Poles can't ship goods out without the say so of the Umma at this point. Even Copenhagen is kinda far gone if you drive out to some of the burbs they have.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

  795. @Mr. XYZ
    @LatW


    What “Russian war with China” are you talking about? My position here is similar to Russian ethnonats – do not give in to China, but do not openly antagonize them. Care about your own first.
     
    Anatoly Karlin talks about how neocons wants to turn Russia against China, which could potentially lead to a war between the two of them down the line in the extraordinarily unlikely scenario that Russia ever took the neocons' bait here:

    https://www.unz.com/akarlin/kissinger-sees-sense-but-its-far-too-late/

    As to Svoboda Rossii and RDK, I like these groups not because they are “shaking up Russia” or not even because they are armed and dangerous anti-Putinists who do not just talk, but act (unlike the Russian liberals (((some))) of whose morality I’ve recently began to question). I like them as people, the Legion because they are honest, egalitarian people, and the RDK because we are ideologically compatible. So I like them for other reasons that neocons might. And, mind you, the neocons do not “like them”, they just view them as convenient in shaking up Russia. These guys, if they could, should get rid of both neocons and the Russian Noviops.
     
    That's actually a very good analysis of this situation, actually. These Russian groups, if smart, should seek to turn Russia into a mix of a futuristic and Amish-style peaceful, insular nation-state, unless of course they also want to seek EU membership for Russia, which this is also compatible with.

    A hyper-futuristic, peaceful, non-expansionist, non-aggressive, traditional Russia, with significantly higher fertility relative to right now in real life, and which is also in the EU--now *that's* a future to look forward to! It can even embrace bitcoin, radical life extension, and/or any other interesting niches.

    Replies: @LatW

    I believe it’s unrealistic to turn China against Russia, or Russia against China.

    As to the Russian freedom fighter groups, they are still in the minority – most Russians do not support their goals. The support is currently increasing, but they also have to share the nationalist niche with the likes of Prigo.

    As to radical life extension, they would probably not be against it per se, but these people want to live the natural way of life. They want to be heroes, not play gods.

    • Agree: Mr. XYZ
    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @LatW

    Do Russians strike you as being notoriously passive, in part possibly because the Bolsheviks killed and/or exiled all of the brave people among them?

    Replies: @Wokechoke

    , @John Johnson
    @LatW

    As to the Russian freedom fighter groups, they are still in the minority – most Russians do not support their goals. The support is currently increasing, but they also have to share the nationalist niche with the likes of Prigo.

    Yes Putin has more support with the masses and they also have a completely controlled state media that tells them how to think. Journalists that question the war end up in prison.

    The freedom fighters would have majority support if Putin was forced to answer questions in an unscripted interview on how exactly is the war is in their best interest. Even in scripted interviews he messes up and can't explain himself or keep a consistent justification. He is basically a scared little boy that is terrified of journalists asking questions and revealing the mediocre KGB paper pusher that pretends to be a confident leader.

    Replies: @Mikel

  796. @LatW
    @Mr. XYZ

    I believe it's unrealistic to turn China against Russia, or Russia against China.

    As to the Russian freedom fighter groups, they are still in the minority - most Russians do not support their goals. The support is currently increasing, but they also have to share the nationalist niche with the likes of Prigo.

    As to radical life extension, they would probably not be against it per se, but these people want to live the natural way of life. They want to be heroes, not play gods.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @John Johnson

    Do Russians strike you as being notoriously passive, in part possibly because the Bolsheviks killed and/or exiled all of the brave people among them?

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @Mr. XYZ

    They are obviously wary of importing Western Utopias like Marxism and Reaganomics any longer.

    "Oh! If only we did this abstraction right this time; why we'd all be rich and happy, this time."

  797. A123 says: • Website
    @LatW
    @Mr. XYZ


    What exactly makes you think that LatW (who is a woman, BTW) is a neocon?
     
    I actually dislike certain neocons (as well as neo-liberals). But I support the internationally recognized borders of Ukraine. Granted, the Ukrainians themselves should've been more careful about governing these borders in some cases, but I am in no position to lecture them (since their situation is extremely complex).

    I don’t see her ever mentioning that she supported a Western or Russian war with China, for instance.
     
    The West should not put themselves in a situation where they have a confrontation with Russia and a confrontation in the Pacific. That is absolutely unacceptable and should be avoided at all costs. The West should not antagonize China but work to become less dependent on China and less entangled with China (granted, China needs the US more than the US needs China). The West is not doing this, which is harmful and dangerous long term, once again, the burden here is only being passed over to the next generation.

    China should not be antagonized, but China should also not be allowed to have a say over European affairs. They should be engaged in a neutrally amicable, but conservative and cautious way.

    What "Russian war with China" are you talking about? My position here is similar to the Russian ethnonats - do not give in to China, but stay on good terms. Care about your own first.

    As to Svoboda Rossii and RDK, I like these groups not because they are "shaking up Russia" or not even because they are armed and dangerous anti-Putinists who do not just talk, but act (unlike the Russian liberals (((some))) of whose morality I've recently began to question). I like them as people, the Legion because they are honest, egalitarian people, and the RDK because we are ideologically compatible. So I like them for other reasons that neocons might. And, mind you, the neocons do not "like them", they just view them as convenient in shaking up Russia. These guys, if they could, should get rid of both neocons and the Russian Noviops.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @A123, @YetAnotherAnon

    become less dependent on China and less entangled with China (granted, China needs the US more than the US needs China).

    Gradual decoupling and MAGA Reindustrialization are the keys to becoming disentangled from Asia and especially the CCP.

    West should not antagonize China

    Some of the necessary steps, such as ending CCP trade exploitation & IP theft, will be unpleasant for low quality Chinese leaders. I am not sure there is any way around that.

    Similarly, until chip disengagement is complete, the U.S. has to protect its access to Taiwan fab industry. The Taiwan Strait is 3 times wider than the English Channel and 12 times wider than the Gibraltar Straight. Does anyone complain about transiting those passages? Of course not. There is nothing ‘provocative’ about being in a huge body of water.

    I believe it’s unrealistic to turn China against Russia, or Russia against China.

    I concur.

    Improving relations between Christian Russia and Christian America will help reduce CCP influence on Russia. However, the Sino-Russian hydrocarbon trade is essential for both of them. They cannot be ‘turned’ on each other.

    Iran is a strategic competitor versus Russia. It might be possible to significantly increase the separation between them. Russia’s best possible outcome in Syria includes displacing Khamenei’s terrorists, so there is a potential upside for Russian enlightened self interest.

    PEACE 😇

  798. @Mr. XYZ
    @Anatoly Karlin


    No. Even to the extent that a “thing” or “object” can be said to have anthropomorphic characteristics such as a capacity for friendships, it’s quite absurd to apply that label to other entities that hate it, despise it, or hold it in contempt.
     
    You previously met up with AP once in real life, didn't you?

    Yes, that’s a good rule of thumb. One needs to make a distinction between EHC in the non-ironic sense, the bearers of the arguments that will win out long-term, and conformist mids who flock in their general direction, the types who are vegan for climate change reasons, or support Ukraine for incorrect (Ukraine as direct champion of progressive causes) and/or evil (Ukraine as based conservative ethno-state) reasons. For instance, NAFO fellas (founded by a Polish alt r*ghtoid) would be a good example of that.
     
    Yeah, I myself support Ukraine for national self-determination and greater economies of scale reasons. Ukraine is better off tying itself to a larger and more successful West/EU (much more elite science production and R & D spending) than to a smaller and less successful Russia. I think that it's the economies of scale (larger future West/EU) argument that is the most appealing to intelligent Westerners in explaining why they should care more about Russian aggression in Ukraine relative to some aggression in the developing world (which doesn't affect the US's oil supplies or whatever). That, and the fact that they view Ukrainians as more culturally similar to them than, say, Muslims or Ethiopians or Congolese are, even if the Sovok influence has yet to be fully removed from Ukraine, though Ukraine is thankfully working on it.

    Correct. Support for freedom of speech goes up with IQ, including even for racists, even as racist sentiment diminishes to near zero amongst EHC.
     
    Yep. I suspect that it's also EHC that's most likely to support BOTH flag burning AND Charlie Hebdo cartoons, including those that ridicule Islam and/or Muslims. Though that's just a hunch on my own part. The duller left could only support flag burning while the duller right could only support "Islamophobic" speech.

    The Dutch as a wayward German people was widespread even in mid-19C Germany. I was amused when Friedrich List in The National System took an abrupt detour from economics to go on an extended rant about how the Netherlands was really a part of Germany and should be integrated into it.
     
    Thanks; I should go and check it out!

    Yes. The evidence for that has become a great deal crisper in the past few years.
     
    Thanks!

    That was my argument here: https://akarlin.com/animals/
     
    Yeah, in that article, you pointed out that, on the net, killing chickens causes almost as much suffering as killing pigs does since for every pig killed, there are dozens of chickens killed, so even though chickens are considerably duller than pigs, it almost evens out in the end.

    I personally rarely (but not never) eat pork, partly for ethical reasons and partly for health reasons. I don't eat all that much beef either, for health reasons. I prefer chicken and fish, including chicken sausages, as well as plant-based patties. And of course a lot of veggies. My weight situation (200 pounds/almost 100 kilograms and exactly 6 feet/1.83 meters tall) is better than it was before. But I'm also currently taking Topiramate in order to curb my excess hunger, and it works great in this regard, actually!

    I oppose that since the demand is an expression of male privilege.

    If anything m*noids need to pay reparations to womyn for thousands of years of patriarchy.
     
    I'm open to sex-based affirmative action for women just so long as trans women as excluded so that men can't identify as trans women in order to game the system. (Though I have an extremely smart extremely close female family member who doesn't need sex-based affirmative action to get ahead. Still, it would be nice for her to have in any case, just as a backup option.)

    That said, though, my proposal for a unilateral child support opt-out above would, as a formal matter, have benefitted both genders. In practice, it would have benefitted men more because they lack the unilateral option of abortion, but women, especially those women who consider abortion to be immoral but don't feel the same way about unilaterally opting-out of paying child support, would also benefit from this proposal of mine. So, my proposal here is not misogynistic or anti-woman but rather meant to benefit everyone. A UBI (which you support) could help provide for the children who are unsupported by their non-custodial parents, if this UBI will actually sufficiently cover children as well.

    Yes, I support that. There are horrific stories around that: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2803834/I-wish-d-aborted-son-ve-spent-47-years-caring-s-shocking-admission-read-judge.html
     
    Yeah, if pro-lifers feel so strongly about this, then they should be very welcome to personally adopt all of the Down's syndrome and other disabled human infants who are unwanted by their biological parents. I don't consider painless elective infanticide to morally be as bad as killing older humans (even toddlers) since human infants don't actually have a conscious desire to live or an understanding of death yet. And with disabled infants, Singer's case is easier since AFAIK they are harder to get adopted relative to healthy infants because adoptive parents generally don't want disabled infants, especially if their disability is serious.

    I lobbied the idea but nobody was interested. The only slightly interesting thing that came out of it was probably on the level of Noah Carl writing culture war type articles for RT.

    I myself was blacklisted from RT for a long time on account of the RationalWiki article (as I keep saying the memes are all American) and now I suppose it’s all irrelevant and for the best anyway.

    Kremlins are too low IQ and ideologically uncommitted to pursuing any such project.

    Steven Seagal, Sameera Khan, Jackson Hinkle, Scott Ritter – that is their intellectual level, the types with whom they feel comfortable corresponding with “on an even level”.
     
    The "Kremlin boomers" meme strikes again lol! ;)

    Obviously one could quibble with the extent to which kremlins ever pursued the Russian nationalist program, but regardless, it’s all invalidated now anyway. I said before that the correct macro-historical interpretation of the Ukraine War is a last gasp Russian attempt to survive as a culturally autonomous civilization alongside the American Empire, China, and maybe India, but in retrospect given what it has revealed about its people and elite, the project was doomed from the start, even had Ukraine been overrun early on (it was a close run thing in the first month).
     
    Yes, that is correct. 2022-2023 for Russia was the equivalent of WWII for Germany, Italy, and Japan. Ironically, Germany, Italy, and Japan are all more accomplished nowadays than Russia is, at least in regards to elite science production and R & D spending, even though they are currently American vassals from a Russian perspective whereas Russia itself is not.

    As a side note, another bad omen in regards to this was when the Kremlin had eight years to turn the Donbass into a shining beacon of the Russian World and instead turned it into a dystopian dump. Transnistria for that matter isn't all that impressive either.

    Yes, I had similar thoughts.
     
    Thanks! It's very sad that he died. The only good thing that can be said about his death is that he maintained his innocence and did not get to tarnish his reputation by supporting Russia's 2022 Ukraine invasion.

    Getting a sovereign Great Power pole somewhat aligned with their least dysfunctional ideas (or potentially alignable at any rate) was realistically their one hope, forlorn as it was.

     

    Please keep in mind, though, that Russia was hardly unequivocally on their side. After all, I don't see very many Russians talking about race and IQ, and Russia is also known as having a notoriously soft spot towards Islam:

    https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2020/10/29/charlie-hebdo-could-not-exist-in-russia-kremlin-a71900

    But even ignoring all of that, these rightoids actually did aim to make a smart move in the sense that by supporting Ukraine, they aimed to win over the entire EU, a much larger and more successful confederation, over to the nationalist cause in due time. This is actually still the logic of people like AP, IIRC. The logic is that infusing the EU with a couple dozen nationalistic Ukrainians would strengthen the nationalist cause in the EU parliament, et cetera, along with possibly a strengthening of Pan-European unity and nationalism as a result of Europe supporting Ukraine in its fight to defend itself against aggressive Caucasian and/or Asiatic Chechens and Buryats. Maybe the EU can't be won over to the nationalistic cause, though it's far from clear since nationalists do appear to be gaining strengthen even in some Western European countries: Italy (Giorgia Meloni), France (Le Pen's father got less than 20% in 2002 but his daughter got over 40% in 2022, though I do wish that there was a prominent French/European nationalist politician who was also pro-Ukraine), Sweden (Sweden Democrats are the kingmakers there), et cetera. But still, banking on winning over the EU, even if it will be a losing gamble, strikes me as being a better deal than banking on a much less populous and less influential Russia. A Greater Russia would have probably had less global influence than a hypothetical confederation of Japan and South Korea, and I doubt that a Japanese-SouKor confederation could have actually won over the West to the nationalist cause.

    I suppose it’s irrelevant one way or the other now, they’re going to continue getting crushed and humiliated at an accelerating pace. I’m going to derive some not inconsiderable Schadenfreude from seeing it happen to the John Johnson and LatW neocon types. To those r*ghtoids I like, my suggestion would be to jump ship before their remaining stocks of social capital goes to zero (that is, align with 🌐🏳️‍🌈, make a bet on the CPC, or on network states – or distribute across them to reduce risk).
     
    What exactly makes you think that LatW (who is a woman, BTW) is a neocon? I don't see her ever mentioning that she supported a Western or Russian war with China, for instance. She does support the Free Russia Legion but even I myself wonder at this point in time whether they would do a better job governing Russia than Putin would. Those are the kinds of Russian nationalists that Ukrainians and other Intermarium peoples actually like, after all. As well as that Westerners either like or tolerate.

    However the majority of them are just going to attack the messenger and seethe quietly in spiteful loserdom – many examples of that helpfully provisioned here – but that’s OK too.
     
    We'll see how things will go over time, I guess!

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @LatW, @Sean, @Anatoly Karlin

    Yeah, I myself support Ukraine for national self-determination and greater economies of scale reasons. Ukraine is better off tying itself to a larger and more successful West/EU (much more elite science production and R & D spending) than to a smaller and less successful Russia. I think that it’s the economies of scale (larger future West/EU) argument that is the most appealing to intelligent Westerners in explaining why they should care more about Russian aggression in Ukraine

    That sounds like the ostensibly economic reform ideas of onetime designated successor to Yeltsin, Boris Nemtsov, but he had ulterior motives. According to America’s Ambassador in Moscow Michael McFaul, in private Nemtsov advocated making Ukraine thoroughly western as a way of getting Putin removed from power. That was physicist Nemtsov’s theory anyway. As far as I can see US moves over Ukraine have entrenched Putin in power and made him aware of the weakness of his conventional armed forces, damaged the prestige of his generals and their ability to restrain him. and attrited the army considerably, which makes him much more dependent on his thermonuclear arsenal–and able to be quick on the draw with it with little input from the Russian military chary of nuke first use.

    A Greater Russia would have probably had less global influence than a hypothetical confederation of Japan and South Korea

    The attempt to deny Russia any sphere of influence at all led to it crossing borders, annexing territory, and presenting US statecraft with a series of difficult problems, in addition to altering the terms of trade (paying more for raw materials), and causing all sorts of trouble in domestic politics such as Ukrainegate and Biden being unable to let Ukraine stop fighting without huge international loss of American prestige. The Western world would have been better off keeping its nose out of Ukraine, and ignored the geopolitical ‘experts’ who thought there was anything to be gained by:-

    • Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
    @Sean

    Some of the comments on that video are gold.

    Replies: @Sean

    , @Mr. XYZ
    @Sean


    The attempt to deny Russia any sphere of influence at all led to it crossing borders, annexing territory, and presenting US statecraft with a series of difficult problems, in addition to altering the terms of trade (paying more for raw materials), and causing all sorts of trouble in domestic politics such as Ukrainegate and Biden being unable to let Ukraine stop fighting without huge international loss of American prestige. The Western world would have been better off keeping its nose out of Ukraine, and ignored the geopolitical ‘experts’ who thought there was anything to be gained by:-
     
    The West was arguably prepared to give Russia a sphere of influence over Central Asia. But Russia didn't want that. Russia wanted Ukraine (and Belarus).

    As for a harm reduction perspective, if one applies it, then sure, the West should have surrendered Ukraine to Russia, especially back in 2013-2014. However, the same logic and perspective if applied consistently would also mean having Russia surrender Serbia to Austria-Hungary back in 1914 and having the Anglo-French surrender Poland and/or the Baltic countries to Nazi Germany so that the Anglo-French can successfully secure an anti-Nazi Soviet alliance.

    Replies: @Sean

  799. @Sean
    @Mr. XYZ


    Yeah, I myself support Ukraine for national self-determination and greater economies of scale reasons. Ukraine is better off tying itself to a larger and more successful West/EU (much more elite science production and R & D spending) than to a smaller and less successful Russia. I think that it’s the economies of scale (larger future West/EU) argument that is the most appealing to intelligent Westerners in explaining why they should care more about Russian aggression in Ukraine
     
    That sounds like the ostensibly economic reform ideas of onetime designated successor to Yeltsin, Boris Nemtsov, but he had ulterior motives. According to America's Ambassador in Moscow Michael McFaul, in private Nemtsov advocated making Ukraine thoroughly western as a way of getting Putin removed from power. That was physicist Nemtsov's theory anyway. As far as I can see US moves over Ukraine have entrenched Putin in power and made him aware of the weakness of his conventional armed forces, damaged the prestige of his generals and their ability to restrain him. and attrited the army considerably, which makes him much more dependent on his thermonuclear arsenal--and able to be quick on the draw with it with little input from the Russian military chary of nuke first use.

    A Greater Russia would have probably had less global influence than a hypothetical confederation of Japan and South Korea
     

    The attempt to deny Russia any sphere of influence at all led to it crossing borders, annexing territory, and presenting US statecraft with a series of difficult problems, in addition to altering the terms of trade (paying more for raw materials), and causing all sorts of trouble in domestic politics such as Ukrainegate and Biden being unable to let Ukraine stop fighting without huge international loss of American prestige. The Western world would have been better off keeping its nose out of Ukraine, and ignored the geopolitical 'experts' who thought there was anything to be gained by:- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-WWdE1_RW0

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Mr. XYZ

    Some of the comments on that video are gold.

    • Replies: @Sean
    @Emil Nikola Richard

    Yes, I wondered what the delay with the bear looking and sort of shaking its head before attacking was about, but a commenter explained "the bear had to process his stupidity".

    In the Ukraine too, there was a delay in reacting.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

  800. @Mr. XYZ
    @Anatoly Karlin


    No. Even to the extent that a “thing” or “object” can be said to have anthropomorphic characteristics such as a capacity for friendships, it’s quite absurd to apply that label to other entities that hate it, despise it, or hold it in contempt.
     
    You previously met up with AP once in real life, didn't you?

    Yes, that’s a good rule of thumb. One needs to make a distinction between EHC in the non-ironic sense, the bearers of the arguments that will win out long-term, and conformist mids who flock in their general direction, the types who are vegan for climate change reasons, or support Ukraine for incorrect (Ukraine as direct champion of progressive causes) and/or evil (Ukraine as based conservative ethno-state) reasons. For instance, NAFO fellas (founded by a Polish alt r*ghtoid) would be a good example of that.
     
    Yeah, I myself support Ukraine for national self-determination and greater economies of scale reasons. Ukraine is better off tying itself to a larger and more successful West/EU (much more elite science production and R & D spending) than to a smaller and less successful Russia. I think that it's the economies of scale (larger future West/EU) argument that is the most appealing to intelligent Westerners in explaining why they should care more about Russian aggression in Ukraine relative to some aggression in the developing world (which doesn't affect the US's oil supplies or whatever). That, and the fact that they view Ukrainians as more culturally similar to them than, say, Muslims or Ethiopians or Congolese are, even if the Sovok influence has yet to be fully removed from Ukraine, though Ukraine is thankfully working on it.

    Correct. Support for freedom of speech goes up with IQ, including even for racists, even as racist sentiment diminishes to near zero amongst EHC.
     
    Yep. I suspect that it's also EHC that's most likely to support BOTH flag burning AND Charlie Hebdo cartoons, including those that ridicule Islam and/or Muslims. Though that's just a hunch on my own part. The duller left could only support flag burning while the duller right could only support "Islamophobic" speech.

    The Dutch as a wayward German people was widespread even in mid-19C Germany. I was amused when Friedrich List in The National System took an abrupt detour from economics to go on an extended rant about how the Netherlands was really a part of Germany and should be integrated into it.
     
    Thanks; I should go and check it out!

    Yes. The evidence for that has become a great deal crisper in the past few years.
     
    Thanks!

    That was my argument here: https://akarlin.com/animals/
     
    Yeah, in that article, you pointed out that, on the net, killing chickens causes almost as much suffering as killing pigs does since for every pig killed, there are dozens of chickens killed, so even though chickens are considerably duller than pigs, it almost evens out in the end.

    I personally rarely (but not never) eat pork, partly for ethical reasons and partly for health reasons. I don't eat all that much beef either, for health reasons. I prefer chicken and fish, including chicken sausages, as well as plant-based patties. And of course a lot of veggies. My weight situation (200 pounds/almost 100 kilograms and exactly 6 feet/1.83 meters tall) is better than it was before. But I'm also currently taking Topiramate in order to curb my excess hunger, and it works great in this regard, actually!

    I oppose that since the demand is an expression of male privilege.

    If anything m*noids need to pay reparations to womyn for thousands of years of patriarchy.
     
    I'm open to sex-based affirmative action for women just so long as trans women as excluded so that men can't identify as trans women in order to game the system. (Though I have an extremely smart extremely close female family member who doesn't need sex-based affirmative action to get ahead. Still, it would be nice for her to have in any case, just as a backup option.)

    That said, though, my proposal for a unilateral child support opt-out above would, as a formal matter, have benefitted both genders. In practice, it would have benefitted men more because they lack the unilateral option of abortion, but women, especially those women who consider abortion to be immoral but don't feel the same way about unilaterally opting-out of paying child support, would also benefit from this proposal of mine. So, my proposal here is not misogynistic or anti-woman but rather meant to benefit everyone. A UBI (which you support) could help provide for the children who are unsupported by their non-custodial parents, if this UBI will actually sufficiently cover children as well.

    Yes, I support that. There are horrific stories around that: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2803834/I-wish-d-aborted-son-ve-spent-47-years-caring-s-shocking-admission-read-judge.html
     
    Yeah, if pro-lifers feel so strongly about this, then they should be very welcome to personally adopt all of the Down's syndrome and other disabled human infants who are unwanted by their biological parents. I don't consider painless elective infanticide to morally be as bad as killing older humans (even toddlers) since human infants don't actually have a conscious desire to live or an understanding of death yet. And with disabled infants, Singer's case is easier since AFAIK they are harder to get adopted relative to healthy infants because adoptive parents generally don't want disabled infants, especially if their disability is serious.

    I lobbied the idea but nobody was interested. The only slightly interesting thing that came out of it was probably on the level of Noah Carl writing culture war type articles for RT.

    I myself was blacklisted from RT for a long time on account of the RationalWiki article (as I keep saying the memes are all American) and now I suppose it’s all irrelevant and for the best anyway.

    Kremlins are too low IQ and ideologically uncommitted to pursuing any such project.

    Steven Seagal, Sameera Khan, Jackson Hinkle, Scott Ritter – that is their intellectual level, the types with whom they feel comfortable corresponding with “on an even level”.
     
    The "Kremlin boomers" meme strikes again lol! ;)

    Obviously one could quibble with the extent to which kremlins ever pursued the Russian nationalist program, but regardless, it’s all invalidated now anyway. I said before that the correct macro-historical interpretation of the Ukraine War is a last gasp Russian attempt to survive as a culturally autonomous civilization alongside the American Empire, China, and maybe India, but in retrospect given what it has revealed about its people and elite, the project was doomed from the start, even had Ukraine been overrun early on (it was a close run thing in the first month).
     
    Yes, that is correct. 2022-2023 for Russia was the equivalent of WWII for Germany, Italy, and Japan. Ironically, Germany, Italy, and Japan are all more accomplished nowadays than Russia is, at least in regards to elite science production and R & D spending, even though they are currently American vassals from a Russian perspective whereas Russia itself is not.

    As a side note, another bad omen in regards to this was when the Kremlin had eight years to turn the Donbass into a shining beacon of the Russian World and instead turned it into a dystopian dump. Transnistria for that matter isn't all that impressive either.

    Yes, I had similar thoughts.
     
    Thanks! It's very sad that he died. The only good thing that can be said about his death is that he maintained his innocence and did not get to tarnish his reputation by supporting Russia's 2022 Ukraine invasion.

    Getting a sovereign Great Power pole somewhat aligned with their least dysfunctional ideas (or potentially alignable at any rate) was realistically their one hope, forlorn as it was.

     

    Please keep in mind, though, that Russia was hardly unequivocally on their side. After all, I don't see very many Russians talking about race and IQ, and Russia is also known as having a notoriously soft spot towards Islam:

    https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2020/10/29/charlie-hebdo-could-not-exist-in-russia-kremlin-a71900

    But even ignoring all of that, these rightoids actually did aim to make a smart move in the sense that by supporting Ukraine, they aimed to win over the entire EU, a much larger and more successful confederation, over to the nationalist cause in due time. This is actually still the logic of people like AP, IIRC. The logic is that infusing the EU with a couple dozen nationalistic Ukrainians would strengthen the nationalist cause in the EU parliament, et cetera, along with possibly a strengthening of Pan-European unity and nationalism as a result of Europe supporting Ukraine in its fight to defend itself against aggressive Caucasian and/or Asiatic Chechens and Buryats. Maybe the EU can't be won over to the nationalistic cause, though it's far from clear since nationalists do appear to be gaining strengthen even in some Western European countries: Italy (Giorgia Meloni), France (Le Pen's father got less than 20% in 2002 but his daughter got over 40% in 2022, though I do wish that there was a prominent French/European nationalist politician who was also pro-Ukraine), Sweden (Sweden Democrats are the kingmakers there), et cetera. But still, banking on winning over the EU, even if it will be a losing gamble, strikes me as being a better deal than banking on a much less populous and less influential Russia. A Greater Russia would have probably had less global influence than a hypothetical confederation of Japan and South Korea, and I doubt that a Japanese-SouKor confederation could have actually won over the West to the nationalist cause.

    I suppose it’s irrelevant one way or the other now, they’re going to continue getting crushed and humiliated at an accelerating pace. I’m going to derive some not inconsiderable Schadenfreude from seeing it happen to the John Johnson and LatW neocon types. To those r*ghtoids I like, my suggestion would be to jump ship before their remaining stocks of social capital goes to zero (that is, align with 🌐🏳️‍🌈, make a bet on the CPC, or on network states – or distribute across them to reduce risk).
     
    What exactly makes you think that LatW (who is a woman, BTW) is a neocon? I don't see her ever mentioning that she supported a Western or Russian war with China, for instance. She does support the Free Russia Legion but even I myself wonder at this point in time whether they would do a better job governing Russia than Putin would. Those are the kinds of Russian nationalists that Ukrainians and other Intermarium peoples actually like, after all. As well as that Westerners either like or tolerate.

    However the majority of them are just going to attack the messenger and seethe quietly in spiteful loserdom – many examples of that helpfully provisioned here – but that’s OK too.
     
    We'll see how things will go over time, I guess!

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @LatW, @Sean, @Anatoly Karlin

    What exactly makes you think that LatW (who is a woman, BTW) is a neocon?

    I’m aware. I was delineating a broad category; LatW is a Nazi more specifically. (On average, womyn have far better political instincts than m*noids, but there are exceptions).

    The RDK are unironic Nazis, homophobes, and misogynists.

    https://antifascist-europe.org/russia/russian-volunteer-corps-denis-whiterex-is-back-in-business/

    No normal person would associate with the scum (the only defensible if cynical form of cooperation with them from an EHC perspective would be to “utilize” them as cannon fodder against stronger regressive forces and lock up any survivors under hate crimes charges when they outlive their usefulness).

    • Replies: @S
    @Anatoly Karlin


    ...the only defensible if cynical form of cooperation with them [RDK] from an EHC perspective would be to “utilize” them as cannon fodder against stronger regressive forces and lock up any survivors under hate crimes charges when they outlive their usefulness.
     
    I think that is the general idea across the board here with the 'Nazis!'TM, ie 'keep your friends close, keep your enemies even closer'.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    , @Mr. XYZ
    @Anatoly Karlin

    Where specifically has LatW identified with Nazi ideology other than by arguing that Jews are a mixed blessing for the West?


    The RDK are unironic Nazis, homophobes, and misogynists.
     
    Well, Russian nationalists are Nazi-lite (cultural genocide rather than physical genocide of Ukrainians), homophobes, and sometimes misogynists as well (if one considers Putin to be a Russian nationalist):

    https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/576807-putin-directs-sexist-remark-at-us-anchor/

    At least Western aid money and the prospect of EU membership has a chance of making the RDK behave better, no? Didn't Azov moderate a bit over the years once it got infused with less radical new members? They might still have Nazi symbols, but largely for show at this point in time, no?

    The RDK aren't that much different from Russian nationalists, other than them being anti-imperialist, both at home and abroad:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_Volunteer_Corps

    "The RVC says it is made up of ethnic Russians fighting to defend Ukraine against Russia's invasion and to overthrow the government of Vladimir Putin.[1] It asserts Russia's government should abandon its imperial ambitions and instead focus on improving the well-being of ethnic Russians. The RVC say they believe in self-determination for Russia's various ethnic minorities and "want to see a smaller, ethnic Russian state".[4][12][13]"

    No normal person would associate with the scum (the only defensible if cynical form of cooperation with them from an EHC perspective would be to “utilize” them as cannon fodder against stronger regressive forces and lock up any survivors under hate crimes charges when they outlive their usefulness).
     
    First Russia would need to bring back Article 282. Or join the EU, but even then, I don't know if there are general EU hate speech laws that also apply to EU countries that don't have specific hate speech laws of their own. (And EHC rejects hate speech laws or is at least ambivalent towards them.)

    Anyway, I'm not super-eager for the RVC to come to power in Russia, but I still can't help wonder if they could do a better job of governing Russia than Putin would. There is some evidence that authoritarian regimes can be good for countries' birth rates, especially if they are capable of mass mobilizing their population behind particular ideologies (as Putin's regime is clearly incapable of doing):

    https://emilkirkegaard.dk/en/2022/01/authoritarianism-and-fertility-maybe-probably/

    That's not to say that I would be particularly *happy* about Russia remaining an authoritarian state. I just think that if that's going to be Russia's fate in any case, then it should be run by people who are anti-imperialist and who have a chance of being better for Russian TFR relative to the Putin regime.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @LatW

    , @Mr. XYZ
    @Anatoly Karlin

    Also, in regards to a lack of race-based affirmative action making POC stop being invested in the American project: Why exactly hasn't this occurred in California, which has banned race-based (but not other, such as economic) affirmative action ever since the 1990s? I don't seem to notice POC here in California being more anti-American than POC in other parts of the US are.

    An attempt to bring back race-based affirmative action in California failed by an almost 15% margin in November 2020, several months after George Floyd's death:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_California_Proposition_16

    Whites, Native Americans, and Asians were against bringing back race-based affirmative action, Latinos were roughly evenly split, and blacks were in favor.

    It might have helped that California does practice economic affirmative action, though. So, it's not a pure meritocracy. (Thus possibly allowing for greater upward economic mobility.)

    As a side note, would you have supported race-based/ethnicity-based affirmative action for Central Asians in Russia had Russia still kept Central Asia up to the present-day? In order to make them more invested in the Russian national project, I mean?

    And for that matter, would you agree that having the Soviet Union promote minority languages and cultures was a great way to try making minorities more attached to the Soviet national project and that the USSR's biggest mistakes were not creating a space for Russians to do the same thing and being an economic failure?

  801. @LatW
    @Yevardian


    it only further highlights how your formative years of cosmopolitan rootlessness and lack of national idenity ultimately led to such mental illness. Not exactly a posterchild for “Open Borders”.
     
    You can't blame a child or a very young person for being taken out of their home environment because of circumstances. And then having been thrown into an environment which may or may not be welcoming or easy to adapt to. It is not easy on the child (and especially a teenager). Those circumstances at the time were not within the control of most individual families. Why chastise their children?

    Western Russophiles, on the other hand, many of them turned out light weight hypocrites who are good at warmongering, but are not real fighters (especially given how much there is to do in their home countries).

    Replies: @Wokechoke

    Western Europeans mostly get to wave and say “hello!” to waves of literal beggar-thy-neighbour Poles, Balts and Ukrainians.

  802. S says:
    @Anatoly Karlin
    @Mr. XYZ


    What exactly makes you think that LatW (who is a woman, BTW) is a neocon?
     
    I'm aware. I was delineating a broad category; LatW is a Nazi more specifically. (On average, womyn have far better political instincts than m*noids, but there are exceptions).

    The RDK are unironic Nazis, homophobes, and misogynists.

    https://antifascist-europe.org/russia/russian-volunteer-corps-denis-whiterex-is-back-in-business/

    No normal person would associate with the scum (the only defensible if cynical form of cooperation with them from an EHC perspective would be to "utilize" them as cannon fodder against stronger regressive forces and lock up any survivors under hate crimes charges when they outlive their usefulness).

    Replies: @S, @Mr. XYZ, @Mr. XYZ

    …the only defensible if cynical form of cooperation with them [RDK] from an EHC perspective would be to “utilize” them as cannon fodder against stronger regressive forces and lock up any survivors under hate crimes charges when they outlive their usefulness.

    I think that is the general idea across the board here with the ‘Nazis!’TM, ie ‘keep your friends close, keep your enemies even closer’.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @S

    Yep. But also EHC might not have a problem with alliances of convenience with far-right elements just so long as these elements will be friendly and not hostile towards EHC and indeed be willing to do EHC's bidding.

  803. @Mr. Hack
    @songbird

    Tens of thousands of Ukrainian immigrants heard the call too, but it wasn't always a bed of roses.
    Buyer beware:

    https://thediscoverblog.files.wordpress.com/2017/05/c056088k.jpg


    The immigration of Ukrainian settlers and Barr colonists was just the beginning; thousands more settled in the Prairies, motivated by the promise of free land and a new life. Yet many did not succeed. Drawn by an idealized version of the West portrayed in the campaign, the newcomers were unprepared for the realities of their new home. However, those who did succeed changed society and helped shape the Prairies into what they are today.
     
    Some of my distant family were a part of this waive. It was really tough by all accounts. Some of the children and grandchildren of this hearty group ended up as movers and shakers in Edmonton and Calgary. I don't know what it's really like today.

    Replies: @Gerard1234

    They never thought of , or called themselves “Ukrainians” you retarded paedophile, Hack.

    They never thought of the people living around the Dnieper as the same people as them, you retarded paedophile, Hack.

    I already mentioned about the lack of ANY Ukrainian place names, like there are in North America for plenty of Russian, Dutch, French, British, even Armenian diasporas. Because ukropism and Ukraine and Ukrainianism isn’t real thing…..no places of settlement with their names.

    • Troll: Mr. Hack
    • Replies: @AP
    @Gerard1234


    I already mentioned about the lack of ANY Ukrainian place names, like there are in North America for plenty of Russian, Dutch, French, British, even Armenian diasporas.
     
    The list is as long as you record of idiocy. But what can one expect from a semi-retarded Sovok "engineer"?:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Canadian_place_names_of_Ukrainian_origin



    Alberta

    Places in Edmonton
    Neighbourhoods
    Baturyn, Edmonton, after Baturyn, a historic castle town in northeastern Ukraine (Nizhyn Raion, Chernihiv Oblast).
    Oleskiw, Edmonton (formerly Wolf Willow Farms),[1] renamed in 1972 after Joseph Oleskiw (1860–1903), professor, writer and promoter of emigration.[2]
    Ozerna, Edmonton, literally "lake district".[1]
    Pylypow Industrial subdivision, after Ivan Pylypow,[1] early pioneer.[3]
    Parks
    Oleskiw Park,[1] after Joseph Oleskiw (1860–1903), professor, writer and promoter of emigration
    Ukrainian Millennium Park (now Primrose Park), for 1989, the one thousandth anniversary of the Baptism of Kiev (the founding of Christianity in Ukraine).[1]
    William Hawrelak Park, after former Edmonton mayor William Hawrelak.[4]
    Roads
    Eleniak Road, Edmonton, after Wasyl Eleniak,[5] early pioneer.[1]
    Schools
    Bishop Greschuk Catholic Elementary School, an Edmonton Catholic separate school.
    Bishop Savaryn Catholic Elementary School, an Edmonton Catholic separate school named after Bishop Nicholas Savaryn, the first leader of the Ukrainian Catholic Eparchy of Edmonton.
    St. Vladimir Catholic Elementary School, an Edmonton Catholic separate school named after St. Volodymyr the Great.
    Rural communities
    Bellis, Alberta, "white woods"; referring to poplars and birch.[6]
    Borsczow, Alberta,[7] northeast of Ryley on Secondary Highway 626; Polonized spelling of Borshchiv, Borshchiv Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Buchach, Alberta, the Buczacz School District No. 2580,[8] and St. Nicholas Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church (Hlus' Church), Buczacz; halfway between Innisfree and Musidora, Alberta off Secondary Highway 870 - from Buchach, Buchach Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Halych, Alberta (located in Westlock County, east of Tawatinaw[9]), from Halych - the historic city in Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast
    Ispas, Alberta,[10] southeast of Hamlin and northwest of Duvernay, Alberta on the south side of the North Saskatchewan River - after Ispas, Vyzhnytsia Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Jaroslaw School District No. 1478,[11] the Descent of the Holy Spirit Ukrainian Catholic Church, Jaroslaw;[12] and St. Demitrius Ukrainian Orthodox Church, Jaroslaw;[13] all northeast of Bruderheim, Alberta on Highway 38 - the Polish name of the city of Yaroslav, now in Jarosław County, Poland.[14]
    Kolomea, Alberta and the Kolomea School District No. 1507,[15] both southeast of Mundare, Alberta - phonetic spelling of Kolomyia, Kolomyia Raion, Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast.
    Lanuke, Alberta,[16] south of Two Hills off Highway 36 - possibly after a local family.
    Luzan, Alberta,[17] southwest of Andrew - after Luzhany, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Mazeppa, Alberta, northeast of High River and northwest of Blackie - the historical English spelling of the last name of Hetman Ivan Mazepa.
    Myrnam, Alberta, "peace to us"; from the Ukrainian word myr, "peace".[18]
    New Kiew, Alberta and the Kiew School District No. 1693,[19] both north of Lavoy, Alberta off Secondary Highway 631 - German and Polish spelling of the capital city of Ukraine.
    Prosvita, Alberta, "enlightenment"; northeast of Athabasca and west of Grassland - possibly comes from the name of the Prosvita "Enlightenment" societies which started in Galicia in the 1860s.
    Shalka, Alberta,[20] north of Hairy Hill off Secondary Highway 645; after postmaster Matt (Dmytro) Shalka.
    Shandro, Alberta, northeast of Andrew off Secondary Highway 857 near the North Saskatchewan River - after the Shandro family from "Rus'kyi Banyliv", Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).[21]
    Shepenge, Alberta, the Szypenitz School District No. 1470,[22] and the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of St. Mary, Szypentiz; all northwest of Hairy Hill and northeast of Duvernay, Alberta off Secondary Highway 860 - after Shypyntsi, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Shishkovitzi was a locality southwest of Hilliard and southeast of Chipman, Alberta centering on St. Mary's Holy Dormition Russo-Greek Orthodox Catholic Church[23] - named after Shyshkivtsi, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Slawa, Alberta, northeast of Myrnam on the Edmonton-to-Lloydminster branch line of the Canadian Pacific Railway[24] - Polonized spelling of the Ukrainian word "glory" (slava).
    Sniatyn, Alberta and the Sniatyn School District No. 1605,[25] both north of Andrew at the confluence of Limestone and Egg Creeks - after Sniatyn, Sniatyn Raion, Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast. Was originally named Hunka,[26] after a settler in the area from Bukovina, and located further upstream on Limestone Creek.
    Spaca Moskalyk was a locality northwest of Vegreville and northeast of Mundare, Alberta centered on the Transfiguration of Our Lord Ukrainian Catholic Church[27][28] - named after both Spas, Kalush Raion, Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast, and the Moskalyk family who donated part of their farmland for the church.
    Stry, Alberta and the Stry School District No. 2508,[29] both southeast of Vilna and northeast of Hamlin, Alberta - after Stryi, Stryi Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Ukalta, Alberta, north of Wostok off Secondary Highway 855 near the North Saskatchewan River - possibly a combination of "Ukrayina" and "Alberta".
    Wasel, Alberta, west of Hamlin near the North Saskatchewan River on Highway 652[20] - Polonized spelling of the Ukrainian common name "Vasyl".
    Wostok, Alberta, Polonized spelling of the Russian word vostok, "east" - named by Galician Russophile immigrant Theodore (Teodor) Nemirsky.[30]
    Zawale, Alberta and the Zawale School District No. 1074,[31] both south of Wostok, Alberta off Highway 29 - Polonized misspelling of Zavalya, Sniatyn Raion, Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast.
    Rural school districts
    Bavilla School District No. 1477,[32] part of the community of Wasel west of Hamlin, Alberta near the North Saskatchewan River - ?.
    Berhometh School District No. 1499,[33] northeast of Hairy Hill, Alberta - a misspelling of Berehomet, Vyzhnytsia Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Bohdan School District No. 3097,[8] south of Myrnam, Alberta - from the male given name Bohdan ("God-given"); possibly after Hetman Bohdan Khmelnytsky.
    Borowich School District No. 2052,[34] north of Willingdon, Alberta - possibly after a local family.
    Brody School District No. 1782,[35] northeast of Mundare, Alberta - after Brody, Brody Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Bukowina School District No. 1162,[36] northeast of Andrew, Alberta; German/Polish spelling of the Austrian crownland of Bukovina - part of which is now in Chernivtsi Oblast, Ukraine.
    Chernowci School No. 1456,[37] northeast of Wostok, Alberta - Polonized misspelling of the city of Chernivtsi, Ukraine.
    Chornik School District No. 2343,[34] northeast of Musidora, Alberta - possibly after a local family.
    Czahar School District No. 2322,[34][38] southwest of Willingdon, Alberta - Polonized spelling of the village of Chahor; now a part of the city of Chernivtsi, Ukraine.
    Ispas School District No. 2765,[33] southeast of Hamlin and northwest of Duvernay, Alberta on the south side of the North Saskatchewan River - after Ispas, Vyzhnytsia Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Koluz School District No. 1631,[33] east of Chipman, Alberta - a Polonized misspelling of Kalush, Kalush Raion, Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast.
    Kotzman School District No. 2325,[34] northeast of Smoky Lake, Alberta - the German spelling of Kitsman, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Krasnahora School District No. 2613,[8] south of Musidora, Alberta - a Ukrainian phrase meaning "beautiful hill".
    Krasne School District No. 2245,[39] northeast of Lavoy and south of Two Hills, Alberta - the Ukrainian word for "beautiful".
    Kysylew School District No. 1467,[40] northeast of Wostok, Alberta near the Limestone Creek[32] - a Polonized misspelling of Kyseliv, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Leszniw School District No. 2621,[8] south of Morecambe and northeast of Innisfree, Alberta - Polonized spelling of Leshniv, Brody Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Lwiw School District No. 1474,[41] southeast of St. Michael and northeast of Chipman, Alberta on Highway 29 - Polonized spelling of the city of Lviv, Ukraine.
    Luzan School District No. 2113,[34] halfway between Musidora, Alberta and the North Saskatchewan River - after Luzhany, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Miroslowna School District No. 2528,[34] northeast of Innisfree, Alberta - Polonized spelling of the Ukrainian word "miroslavna", meaning "Glorified Peace".
    Molodia School District No. 1486,[42] south of Andrew and north of Mundare, Alberta at the junction of Highway 29 and Secondary Highway 855 - after Molodiia, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Myrnam School District No. 2219, northwest of the modern townsite of Myrnam, Alberta - "peace to us"; from the Ukrainian word myr, "peace".[43]
    Nizir School District No. 2179,[44] east of Two Hills, southeast of Duvernay and northwest of Musidora, Alberta - ?.
    Oleskow School District No. 1612,[45] southeast of Mundare, Alberta and west of Vegreville; after Joseph Oleskiw (1860–1903) - author of the pamphlets "On Free Lands" (Pro Vilni Zemli, spring 1895),[46][47] and "On Emigration" (O emigratsiy, December 1895).[2]
    Paraskevia School District No. 1487,[40] northeast of Hilliard and north of Mundare, Alberta on Secondary Highway 855[48] - possibly after one of the saints named Paraskevi.
    Peremysl School District No. 2944,[8] southeast of Radway, Alberta on the south side of the North Saskatchewan River on Secondary Highway 831 - a phonetic misspelling of the Ukrainian name ("Peremyshl") for Przemyśl, Poland.[14]
    Podola School District No. 2065,[49] south of Hilliard and west of Mundare, Alberta near the Beaverhill Creek - Polonized spelling of the Ukrainian region of Podillia.
    Pobeda School District No. 1604,[33] southeast of Two Hills and west of Morecambe, Alberta - ?.
    Proswita School District No. 1563,[40] northeast of Star and northwest of St. Michael, Alberta off Highway 45[32] - Polonized spelling of the Ukrainian word for "enlightenment"; possibly after the Prosvita Society of Galicia.
    Provischena School District No. 1476,[40] south of Bellis, Alberta near the North Saskatchewan River[32] - possibly after the Ukrainian word for "prophecy" (provishchennya).
    Pruth School Division No. 2064,[34] northwest of Warwick, Alberta - after the Prut river in Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Radymno School District No. 2942,[8] part of the rural community of Leeshore east of Redwater, Alberta on the south side of the North Saskatchewan River - after the town of Radymno, now in Jarosław County, Poland.[14]
    Russia School District No. 2069,[34] south of Musidora, Alberta; from school board confusion over Rusyny / Ruthenian vs. Russki / Russian.
    Ruthenia School District No. 2408,[34] southeast of Smoky Lake and southwest of Bellis, Alberta - after the Austro-Hungarian name for the Ukrainian territories of Galicia, Bukovina, and Carpathian Ruthenia (now Transcarpathian Oblast).
    Shandro School District No. 1438, halfway between Willingdon, Alberta and the North Saskatchewan River - after the Shandro family from "Rus'kyi Banyliv", Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).[50]
    Sheptycki School District No. 2920,[8] southeast of Waskatenau, Alberta on the south side of the North Saskatchewan River - possibly after The Venerable Metropolitan Andrey Sheptytsky (1865–1944).
    Sherentz School District No. 2614,[8] south of Beauvallon and southwest of Myrnam, Alberta - possibly after Shyrivtsi, currently in Dnistrovskyi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Sich School District No. 1595,[51] northeast of Warwick, Alberta - after the fortresses of the Ukrainian Cossacks.
    Skeskowicz School District No. 1801,[34] southwest of Willingdon, Alberta - ?.
    Skowiatyn School District No. 2483,[34] northwest of Wostok, Alberta near the North Saskatchewan River - after Skoviatyn, Borshchiv Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Slawa School District No. 2400,[34] south of the old townsite of Slawa, Alberta - Polonized spelling of the Ukrainian word "glory" (slava).
    Stanislawow School District No. 1485,[40] northeast of Mundare, Alberta[48] - Polish spelling of the town of Stanislaviv, now Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine.
    Svit School District No. 1491,[40] east of Chipman and northeast of Hilliard, Alberta[52] - the Ukrainian word for "the world" or "light".
    Svoboda School District No. 1479,[11] part of the rural community of Skaro northwest of St. Michael, Alberta at the junction of Highway 45 and Secondary Highway 831 - the Ukrainian word for "liberty".
    Toporoutz School District No. 1935,[44] east of Warspite and southwest of Smoky Lake, Alberta - German spelling of Toporivtsi, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Ukraina School District No. 1672,[33] southeast of Hilliard and southwest of Mundare, Alberta - phonetic spelling of "Ukraine" in the Ukrainian language.
    Uhryn School District No. 2409,[34] southeast of Beauvallon and southwest of Myrnam, Alberta - possibly after one of nine places named "Uhryniv"[53] in Galicia.
    Vladymir School District No. 1217,[54] northwest of Mundare, Alberta - after district pioneer Vladymir Svarich (Volodymyr Zvarych).
    Wolie School District No. 2591,[8] west of Warwick, Alberta on the south shore of Bens Lake - Polonized misspelling of the Ukrainian word "freedom" (volya).
    Zaporoze School District No. 2246,[55] northeast of Lavoy, Alberta - a phonetic spelling of "Zaporizhzhia"; after the Zaporizhian Host of Ukrainian Cossacks.
    Zhoda School District No. 1498,[33] southeast of Willingdon and west of Hairy Hill, Alberta - the Ukrainian word for "harmony".
    Zora School District No. 2487,[34] northwest of the modern townsite of Slawa, Alberta - possibly a misspelling of the Ukrainian word for "dawn" (zoria).

    Manitoba
    Rural communities
    Chortitz, Manitoba, south of Winkler off Highway 32; German spelling of Khortytsia island, located in the Dnipro river now within the city of Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine - Manitoba hamlet named by "Russian" Mennonite immigrants.
    Dneiper, Manitoba[56] (renamed "Fishing River"), east of Ukraina and northeast of Sifton - after the Dnipro river.
    Halicz, Manitoba,[57] northwest of Trembowla and north of Ashville near Highway 10 - a Polonized spelling of Halych, a historic Ukrainian city in Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast.
    Horod, Manitoba, north of Elphinstone on Provincial Road 354, near the south boundary of Riding Mountain National Park - the Ukrainian word for "city".
    Jaroslaw, Manitoba, southwest of Hnausa; the Polish name of the city of Yaroslav, now in Jarosław County, Poland.[14]
    Komarno, Manitoba, the Ukrainian word for "mosquito" - possibly after Komarno, Horodok Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Kulish, Manitoba, northwest of Ethelbert; after Panteleimon Kulish (1819–1897).
    Medika, Manitoba, north of Hadashville on Provincial Road 507 - after Medyka on the present Polish-Ukrainian border.[14]
    Melnice, Manitoba, west of Dunnottar and southwest of Winnipeg Beach, at the junction of Highway 8 and Provincial Road 225 - the Ukrainian word for "windmill".[58]
    Morweena, Manitoba, northwest of Arborg and southeast of Fisher Branch on Provincial Road 329 - ?.
    Okno, Manitoba, northwest of Riverton near Shorncliffe - the Ukrainian word for "window".
    Oleskiw, Manitoba,[59] west of Stuartburn on Provincial Road 201; after Dr. Joseph Oleskiw (1860–1903) - author of the pamphlets "On Free Lands" (Pro Vilni Zemli, spring 1895),[46][47] and "On Emigration" (O emigratsiy, December 1895).[2]
    Olha, Manitoba,[59] east of Rossburn and north of Oakburn on Provincial Road 577; from female given name Olha (c.f. Russian "Olga") - possibly after Princess Olha (c. 890–969).
    Ozerna, Manitoba, southeast of Erickson and northeast of Newdale - literally "lake district".
    Petlura, Manitoba, at the junction of Provincial Road 366 and Provincial Road 584 near the north boundary of Riding Mountain National Park - after Ukrainian independence leader Symon Petliura (1879–1926).
    Prawda, Manitoba, southeast of Hadashville on the eastbound lanes of the Trans-Canada Highway; a Polonized spelling of the Ukrainian (and Russian) word pravda, "truth".
    Ruthenia, Manitoba, northeast of Angusville and north of the Waywayseecappo townsite on Provincial Road 264, near the south boundary of Riding Mountain National Park - after the Austro-Hungarian name for the Ukrainian territories of Galicia, Bukovina, and Carpathian Ruthenia (now Transcarpathian Oblast).
    Seech, Manitoba, east of Olha and northwest of Elphinstone, near the south boundary of Riding Mountain National Park - a phonetic misspelling of the Ukrainian word "sich"; after the fortresses of the Ukrainian Cossacks.
    Senkiw, Manitoba, northwest of Roseau River and southwest of Rosa - possibly after a local family.
    Sirko, Manitoba,[60] south of Sundown near the Minnesota border - possibly after the Ukrainian Cossack leader Ivan Sirko (c. 1610–1680).
    Szewczenko, Manitoba (renamed "Vita"), west of Stuartburn on Provincial Road 201; a Polonized spelling of Taras Shevchenko's last name.
    Trembowla, Manitoba, northwest of Dauphin on Provincial Road 491; the Polish spelling of Terebovlia, Terebovlya Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Ukraina, Manitoba,[61] southeast of Ethelbert and northwest of Sifton on Provincial Road 273; a phonetic spelling of "Ukraine" in the Ukrainian language.
    Vidir, Manitoba, northwest of Arborg on Provincial Road 233 - ?.
    Zbaraz, Manitoba, southeast of Fisher Branch and northwest of Arborg on Provincial Road 329 - a phonetic spelling of Zbarazh, Zbarazh Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Zelana, Manitoba, northeast of Ukraina and east of Ethelbert on Provincial Road 269 - a misspelling of the Ukrainian word for "green" (zelena).
    Zelena, Manitoba, northeast of Makaroff and west of the junction of Provincial Road 594 and Highway 83 - the Ukrainian word for "green".
    Zhoda, Manitoba, north of Vita and southeast of Steinbach on Highway 12; the Ukrainian word for "harmony".
    Zoria, Manitoba,[62] east of Sifton off Highway 10 - the Ukrainian word for "dawn".


    Saskatchewan
    "Krassna" was a parish of German Roman Catholics[63] south of Leader, Saskatchewan - German spelling of Krasne, Izmail Raion, Odesa Oblast.
    St. Volodymyr Ukrainian Park, Saskatchewan, a campground owned by the Saskatoon branch of the Ukrainian Catholic Brotherhood of Canada; featuring a small Ukrainian Catholic church dedicated to St. Volodymyr.
    Places in Regina
    Schools
    Elsie Mironuck Community School in Regina, a public elementary school.
    W. S. Hawrylak School in Regina, a public elementary school.
    Places in Saskatoon
    Schools
    Bishop Filevich Ukrainian Bilingual School in Saskatoon, a Catholic separate school specializing in the study of the Ukrainian language, history and culture.
    Bishop Roborecki School in Saskatoon, a Catholic separate school named after Bishop Andriy Roboretsky, the first leader of the Ukrainian Catholic Eparchy of Saskatoon.
    St. Petro Mohyla Institute, Saskatoon, a private college for the study of the Ukrainian language, history and culture - after St. Petro Mohyla.
    St. Volodymyr School in Saskatoon, a Catholic separate school named after St. Volodymyr the Great.
    Rural communities
    Adamiwka School District No. 1994 and the Ukrainian Catholic Church of the Descent of the Holy Ghost, Adamiwka;[64] both southeast of Rosthern, Saskatchewan - after "Adamivka",[65] now in Jarosław County, Poland.[14]
    Antoniwka was a locality north of Canora, Saskatchewan centered on the Ukrainian Catholic parish of the Assumption; named after Antonivka, Chortkiv Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    "Belyk's" was a locality north of Borden, Saskatchewan centered on the "Ivan Franko National Home" - built on Yurko Belyk's farmland[66] - and the Redberry Park rural post office; also the location of the Assumption of St. Mary Ukrainian Orthodox church.
    Beresina, Saskatchewan, northeast of Churchbridge; German spelling of "Berezyna" (now Rozdil[67] in Mykolaiv Raion), Lviv Oblast - Saskatchewan post office named by ethnic Germans from Galicia.
    Bobulynci was a locality southwest of Rose Valley, Saskatchewan centered on the Ukrainian Catholic parish of The Transfiguration - named after Bobulyntsi, Buchach Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Bodnari (or "Kolo Bodnariv") was a locality northeast of Vonda, Saskatchewan named after Teodor Bodnar,[66] who donated part of his farmland to the Ukrainian Catholic parish of Saints Peter and Paul for a church.
    Buchach was a locality near Hazel Dell, Saskatchewan centered on the Ukrainian Catholic Church of the Patronage of the Blessed Virgin Mary; named after Buchach, Buchach Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Bukowina, Saskatchewan, south of Yellow Creek; German/Polish spelling of the Austrian crownland of Bukovina - part of which is now in Chernivtsi Oblast, Ukraine. Named by Bukovinian immigrant and postmaster John (Ivan) Fessiuk.[68]
    Byrtnyky was a locality between Kelvington and Endeavour, Saskatchewan named after one of three places named "Byrtnyky"[69] in Lviv Oblast.
    Chorney Beach, Saskatchewan, a resort beach at Fishing Lake southeast of Wadena; possibly after a local family.
    Chortitz, Saskatchewan, south of Swift Current on Highway 379; German spelling of Khortytsia island, located in the Dnipro river now within the city of Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine - Saskatchewan hamlet named by "Russian" Mennonite immigrants.
    Dmytruk Lake, north of Cree Lake; after Peter Dmytruk of Wynyard, Saskatchewan (aka "Pierre le Canadien"), a member of the Royal Canadian Air Force who served with the French Resistance after being shot down near Paris in 1943.[70]
    Dneiper, Saskatchewan, north of Rhein, after the Dnipro river.
    Dneister, Saskatchewan (renamed "Hamton"),[71] northeast of Rhein on Highway 650; after the Dniester river.
    Dobrowody, Saskatchewan and the Dobrowody School District No. 2637, both northeast of Rama, Saskatchewan - a Ukrainian phrase meaning "good water"; after a village of the same name ("Dobrovody")[72] in Pidhaitsi Raion, Ternopil Oblast, Ukraine.
    Drobot, Saskatchewan, north of Theodore, after Thomas Drobot - postmaster from 1909 to 1917.
    Halyary, Saskatchewan, southwest of Preeceville - a Postmaster General/Government of Canada misspelling of "Halychy".[73]
    Halycry School District No. 2835, also southwest of Preeceville, Saskatchewan - a Department of Education misspelling of "Halychy".[73]
    Havryliuky was a locality south of Prud'homme, Saskatchewan named after Nicholas Hawryluk (Nykola Havryliuk),[66] who donated part of his farmland for Sacred Heart of Jesus Ukrainian Catholic Church.
    Hryhoriw School District No. 2390 and the Ukrainian Catholic parish of St. Demetrius, Hryhoriw; both south of Preeceville, Saskatchewan - after Hryhoriv, Buchach Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Hory (also called Carpenter-Hory) was a locality southwest of Wakaw, Saskatchewan centering on the Ukrainian Catholic parish of The Ascension of Our Lord Jesus Christ - after the Ukrainian word for "mountains" ("hori").
    Janow School District No. 2842 and Janow Corners, Saskatchewan, both south of Meath Park; after a village called "Yaniv" (now Ivano-Frankove),[74] in Yavoriv Raion, Lviv Oblast, Ukraine.
    Kalyna, Saskatchewan, and the Kalyna School District No. 3945, both south of Meath Park, Saskatchewan - after the Ukrainian word for the "highbush cranberry".
    Kiev was a locality southwest of Rose Valley, Saskatchewan centered on a Ukrainian Orthodox Church; named after the capital city of Ukraine.
    Kobzar School District No. 3597 and the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the Holy Ascension, Arran-Kobzar; both south of Arran, Saskatchewan - after the book of poems by Taras Shevchenko.
    Kolo Pidskal'noho (or "Pidskalny's") was a locality west of Cudworth, Saskatchewan named after Ivan Pidskalny,[75] who donated part of his farmland to the Ukrainian Catholic parish of St. Demetrius for a church.
    Kolo Solomyanoho was a locality west of Cudworth, Saskatchewan named after Ivan Solomyany,[75] who donated part of his farmland for the (unspecified) Ukrainian Church of the Holy Transfiguration.
    Kowalowka School District No. 1739 and the Ukrainian Catholic Church of The Transfiguration, Kovalivka; both northeast of Canora, Saskatchewan - after Kovalivka, Buchach Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Krasne, Saskatchewan, west of Wishart, the Ukrainian word for "beautiful"; after a village in Pidvolochysk Raion,[72] Ternopil Oblast, Ukraine.
    Krydor, Saskatchewan, after Peter (Petro) Krysak and Teodor Lucyk, local settlers.
    Krim was a locality south of Aberdeen, Saskatchewan and is the German spelling of the Crimean peninsula - named by "Russian" Mennonites from the Taurida Governorate of the Russian Empire, now Ukraine.
    Kulykiv was a locality north of Invermay, Saskatchewan named after Kulykiv, Zhovkva Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Kvitka, Saskatchewan, south of Jedburgh, after Gregory (Hryhory) Kvitka (1778–1843), Ukrainian novelist.
    Kyziv-Tiaziv, Saskatchewan, south of Rama, after Tiaziv, Tysmenytsia Raion, Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast.[76][77]
    Laniwci, Saskatchewan, and the Laniwci School District No. 2300, both west of Alvena, Saskatchewan - Polonized spelling of Lanivtsi, Borshchiv Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Lemberg, Saskatchewan, German name for Lviv, Ukraine - Saskatchewan town named by ethnic Germans from Galicia.
    Leskiw Lake, southwest of Creighton, Saskatchewan; after Anthony Leskiw of Saskatoon, "lost at sea in October 1940 while serving aboard SS Whitford Point, torpedoed in the north Atlantic by a German submarine".[75]
    Malonek, Saskatchewan, and the Malonek School District No. 3669, both northeast of Pelly, Saskatchewan; perhaps after "Malynivka"[78] - now Malinówka, Brzozów County, Poland.[14]
    New Yaroslau, the name of a Ukrainian block settlement northeast of Yorkton, Saskatchewan; after the ancient city of Yaroslav - now in Jarosław County, Poland.[14]
    Odessa, Saskatchewan, after the city of Odesa, Ukraine - Saskatchewan village named by ethnic Germans from the neighbouring Bessarabia Governorate of the Russian Empire, which is today split between Moldova and Ukraine.
    Orolow, Saskatchewan (also called "Teshliuk's"),[69] south of Krydor - Polonized misspelling of Ordiv, Radekhiv Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Paniowce, Saskatchewan (renamed "Swan Plain"[79]), north of Norquay on Highway 8 - Polonized misspelling of Panivtsi Zelene, Borshchiv Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Rak, Saskatchewan, northeast of Vonda on Highway 41 - after Joseph Rak[66] from Lanivtsi, Borshchiv Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Rebryna was a locality northeast of Hafford, Saskatchewan centered on the "Redberry Ivan Franko Library and Hall", named after Paul (Pavlo) Rebryna.[66]
    Sich School District No. 3454, the Sich community hall and the Ukrainian Catholic parish of St. Michael, "Krydor Sich"; all west of Blaine Lake, Saskatchewan - after the fortresses of the Ukrainian Cossacks.
    Sokal, Saskatchewan, and the Sokal School District No. 1955, both west of Wakaw, Saskatchewan - named after Sokal, Sokal Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Stanislavtsi was a locality south of Foam Lake, Saskatchewan named after Stanislaviv (now Ivano-Frankivsk), Ukraine; also the location of the "Michael Hrushewski" community hall.
    Tarnopol, Saskatchewan, Polonized spelling of Ternopil, Ternopil Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Vasyliv (or "Kolo Vasyleva") was a locality south of Buchanan, Saskatchewan centered on the Ukrainian Catholic parish of Saints Constantine and Helena; named after "N. Wasyliw".[75]
    Vorobceve was a locality just west of Krydor, Saskatchewan centered on the Ukrainian Catholic Church of St. Demetrius; named after the Worobetz family.[80]
    Walawa, Saskatchewan, west of Theodore; Polonized spelling of "Valiava" - now in Przemyśl County, Poland.[14]
    Welechko (or "Bilya Velychka") was a locality south of Hafford, Saskatchewan, named after Ivan Welechko[66] - who donated part of his farmland to the Ukrainian Catholic parish of The Presentation for a church; also the location of the "Taras Shewchenko" community hall.
    Whitkow, Saskatchewan, west of Mayfair on Highway 378, is an Anglo-Polonized spelling[81] of Vytkiv, Radekhiv Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Rural school districts
    Bereziw School District No. 3030 (changed to "Slawa School"),[78] south of Hafford, Saskatchewan; after the district (povit) of "Bereziv" - now Brzozów County, Poland.[14]
    Bogucz School District No. 1743, southeast of Canora, Saskatchewan; possibly after "Bohusa" - now Bogusza,[78] Nowy Sącz County, Poland.[14]
    Bohdan School District No. 3511, east of Mayfair, Saskatchewan; from the male given name Bohdan ("God-given") - possibly after Bohdan Khmelnytsky.
    Bridok School District No. 1765, south of Canora, Saskatchewan, after Bridok, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Bukowina School District No. 2012, southeast of Wakaw, Saskatchewan; German/Polish spelling of the Austrian crownland of Bukovina - part of which is now in Chernivtsi Oblast, Ukraine.
    Cheremosz School District No. 4004, north of Endeavour, Saskatchewan, after the Cheremosh river that separated Galicia and Bukovina.
    Crimea School District No. 4195, southwest of Eatonia, Saskatchewan, after the peninsula in the Black Sea - School named by ethnic Germans from the Taurida Governorate of the Russian Empire, now Ukraine.
    Czernawka School District No. 1712, north of MacNutt, Saskatchewan; Polonized misspelling of "Cherniavka" - now Czerniawka,[78] in Jarosław County, Poland.[14]
    Dnister School District No. 1635, southwest of Canora, Saskatchewan, after the Dniester river.
    Dobraniwka School District No. 2608, southeast of Rosthern, Saskatchewan; a Polonized variation of the Ukrainian phrase for "extremely good"[82] ("dobraniv").
    Drahomanow School District No. 2501, southeast of Prud'homme, Saskatchewan, after Mykhailo Drahomanov (1841–1895).
    Fedoruk School District No. 2342, southwest of Veregin, Saskatchewan, after school trustee Nicoli (Mykola) Fedoruk.[83]
    Fosti School District No. 1700, south of Sheho, Saskatchewan, after school board treasurer John (Ivan) Fosti.[84]
    Franko School District No. 1740, east of Canora, Saskatchewan, after Ivan Franko (1856–1916).
    Halicz School District No. 3204, northwest of Wishart, Saskatchewan; Polonized spelling of the historic Ukrainian city in Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast - named by a "Mr. Bodnarchuk".[85]
    Horodenka School District No. 1845, west of Wakaw, Saskatchewan, after Horodenka, Kolomyia Raion, Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast.
    Horosziwci School District No. 2433 (renamed "War End School"),[78] west of Theodore, Saskatchewan; possibly after "Horokhivtsi" - now in Przemyśl County, Poland.[14]
    Husiatyn School District No. 791 (renamed "Claytonville School"),[86] south of Meath Park, Saskatchewan, after Husiatyn, Husiatyn Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Jablonow School District No. 1672 (renamed "Wroxton School")[87] at Wroxton, Saskatchewan - Polonized spelling of Yabloniv, Kolomyia Raion, Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast.
    Jarema School District No. 1731, north of Calder, Saskatchewan, possibly after the town of Yaremche[87] in Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast.
    Kaminka School District No. 1632 at Tway, Saskatchewan, after "Kaminka"/Kamianka-Buzka, Kamianka-Buzka Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Kiev School District No. 1728 (originally "Kyjiw"), north of Alvena, Saskatchewan - after the capital city of Ukraine.
    Kitzman Scholl District No. 2400, northeast of Rhein, Saskatchewan, after Kitsman, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Kolomyia School District No. 1878, west of Wakaw, Saskatchewan, after Kolomyia, Kolomyia Raion, Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast.
    Krasne School District No. 3058, south of Hafford, Saskatchewan - the Ukrainian word for "beautiful".
    Krasny School District No. 1121, southwest of Sheho, Saskatchewan - also after the Ukrainian word for "beautiful".
    Larisa School District No. 5186, west of Wishart, Saskatchewan, after Larysa Kosach-Kvitka (Lesia Ukrainka, 1871–1913).
    Lodi School District No. 3509, north of Okla, Saskatchewan, the Ukrainian word for "ice".
    Luzan School District No. 255, south of Veregin, Saskatchewan, after Luzhany, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Lysenko School District No. 494, at Insinger, Saskatchewan, after Mykola Lysenko (1842–1912).
    Mazeppa School District No. 2860, southeast of Canora, Saskatchewan, after Hetman Ivan Mazepa.
    Monastyr School District No. 2328, north of Buchanan, Saskatchewan, after Monastyryska, Monastyryska Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Mostetz School District No. 1734, northwest of Calder, Saskatchewan, Germanic spelling[88] of "Mostyshche"/Mostyska, Mostyska Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Nauka School District No. 3059, south of Hafford, Saskatchewan - the Ukrainian word for "learning".
    Nichlava School District No. 1877 (formerly "Heuboden School"),[89] southeast of Rosthern, Saskatchewan, after the Nichlava river in Ternopil Oblast.
    Odessa School District No. 2327, south of Tramping Lake, Saskatchewan; after the city of Odesa, Ukraine - School named by ethnic Germans from the neighbouring Bessarabia Governorate of the Russian Empire, which is today split between Moldova and Ukraine.
    Oleskow School District No. 540, north of Rhein, Saskatchewan, after Joseph Oleskiw (1860–1903) - author of the pamphlets "On Free Lands" (Pro Vilni Zemli, spring 1895),[46][47] and "On Emigration" (O emigratsiy, December 1895).[2]
    Orolow School District No. 2392, south of Krydor, Saskatchewan - a Department of Education misspelling of Ordiv, Radekhiv Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Osin School District No. 3598, north of Arran, Saskatchewan, the Ukrainian word for "autumn".
    Oukraina School District No. 2402, west of Krydor, Saskatchewan - a Department of Education phonetic spelling of Ukrayina (Ukraine).
    Ozeriany School District No. 2722 (renamed "Carpathian School"), south of Cudworth, Saskatchewan - the Ukrainian word for "from the lake"; after one of four places named "Ozeriany"[90] in Galicia.
    Paniowce School District No. 291 (renamed "Swan Plain School"),[79] north of Norquay, Saskatchewan on Highway 8 - Polonized misspelling of Panivtsi Zelene, Borshchiv Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Paseika School District No. 2419, south of Arran, Saskatchewan - a Department of Education phonetic spelling of "pasika"; a Ukrainian word for "beehive" or "apiary".
    Podole School District No. 3227, northeast of Prince Albert, Saskatchewan - the Polish spelling of the Ukrainian region of Podillia.
    Podolia School District No. 2384, northeast of Arran, Saskatchewan - a misspelling of the Ukrainian region of Podillia.
    Pohorlowtz School District No. 2578, southwest of Sheho, Saskatchewan - Germanic misspelling[74] of Pohoril'tsi, Peremyshliany Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Poltawa School District No. 2335 (renamed "Carpenter School"),[91] northeast of Cudworth, Saskatchewan; Polonized spelling of the city of Poltava, Ukraine - probably after the famous battle in 1709.
    Probizna School District No. 1724 (renamed "Geddes School"),[86] northeast of Wroxton, Saskatchewan, after Probizhna, Chortkiv Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Prosvita School District No. 3457, west of Mayfair, Saskatchewan, after the Prosvita Society in Galicia.
    Radimno School District No. 2682, southeast of Willowbrook, Saskatchewan; after the town of Radymno, now in Jarosław County, Poland.[14]
    Rak School District No. 3244, northeast of Vonda, Saskatchewan on Highway 41 - after Joseph Rak[66] from Lanivtsi, Borshchiv Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Rus School District No. 2584, south of Hafford, Saskatchewan, after Kievan Rus'.
    Ruthenia School District No. 404, southwest of Cudworth, Saskatchewan; after the Austro-Hungarian name for the Ukrainian territories of Galicia, Bukovina, and Carpathian Ruthenia (now Transcarpathian Oblast).
    Sambor School District No. 4057, northeast of Dysart, Saskatchewan; Polonized spelling of Sambir, Sambir Raion, Lviv Oblast - School named by ethnic Germans from Galicia.
    Scalat School District No. 1623, southeast of Canora, Saskatchewan - misspelling of Skalat, Pidvolochysk Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Siczynski School District No. 2513, near Meacham, Saskatchewan - Polonized spelling of the last name of Ukrainian composer and conductor Denys Sichynsky (1865–1909).[92]
    Skala School District No. 2712, west of Cudworth, Saskatchewan - after Skala-Podilska, Borshchiv Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Slawa School District No. 3030 (formerly "Bereziw School"),[78] south of Hafford, Saskatchewan - Polonized spelling of the Ukrainian word "glory" (slava).
    Sniatyn School District No. 1729, west of Wakaw, Saskatchewan, after Sniatyn, Sniatyn Raion, Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast.
    Stanisloff School District No. 3105, south of Foam Lake, Saskatchewan - a Department of Education phonetic misspelling of "Stanislav", after Stanislaviv (now Ivano-Frankivsk), Ukraine.
    Stawchan School District No. 1826, north of Rhein, Saskatchewan - a Polonized misspelling of Stavchany, Horodok Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Stryj School District No. 3201, north of Goodeve, Saskatchewan - German/Polish spelling of Stryi, Stryi Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Svoboda School District No. 1704, northwest of Alvena, Saskatchewan - the Ukrainian word for "liberty".
    Taras School District No. 4880, north of Gronlid, Saskatchewan, after Taras Shevchenko.
    Toporoutz School District No. 1666 (renamed "Chaucer School"),[68] north of Calder, Saskatchewan - German spelling of Toporivtsi, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Torsk School District No. 1713, east of Calder, Saskatchewan - after Torske, Zalishchyky Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Vasloutz School District No. 2642, south of Buchanan, Saskatchewan - Germanic misspelling of Vasylkivtsi,[79] Husiatyn Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Verenczanka School District No. 264 (renamed "New Canadian School"),[68] east of Rhein, Saskatchewan - Polonized spelling of Verenchanka, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Vesna School District No. 736, southeast of Arran, Saskatchewan, the Ukrainian word for "spring (season)".
    Verbowska School District No. 1737, north of MacNutt, Saskatchewan; a Polonized misspelling of Verbivka, Borshchiv Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Vladimir School District No. 2193, west of Alvena, Saskatchewan, after St. Volodymyr the Great.
    Wasileff School District No. 1692 (renamed "Yemen School"),[68] west of Insinger, Saskatchewan - an Anglo-Polonized spelling of Vasyliv, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Whitkow School District No. 4508 and Whitkow Hamlet School District No. 5118, both west of Mayfair, Saskatchewan on Highway 378; an Anglo-Polonized spelling[81] of Vytkiv, Radekhiv Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Wisnia School District No. 2870, southeast of Veregin, Saskatchewan - Polonized misspelling of the Vyshnia river in Lviv Oblast.
    Wolia School District No. 3503, southwest of Glaslyn, Saskatchewan - Polonized spelling of the Ukrainian word "freedom" (volya).
    Wolna School District No. 3503, east of Rama, Saskatchewan - Polonized spelling of the Ukrainian word "free" (vilna).
    Wysla School District No. 4106, southwest of Canora, Saskatchewan - Polonized misspelling of the Ukrainian word (Vysla) for the Vistula river.
    Zamok School District No. 784, south of Meath Park, Saskatchewan, after Zamok, Zhovkva Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Zaporoze School District No. 3188, west of Krydor, Saskatchewan - a Department of Education phonetic spelling of "Zaporizhzhia";[93] after the Zaporizhian Host of Ukrainian Cossacks.
    Zayacz School District No. 3416 (renamed "Liberal School"), north of Calder, Saskatchewan, after school trustee "A. Zayacz"[94] (Zayach?).
    Zazula School District No. 4526, northwest of Hendon, Saskatchewan, after district pioneer Fred Zazula.[75]
    Zbaraz School District No. 2403, south of Krydor, Saskatchewan, a misspelling of Zbarazh, Zbarazh Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Zhoda School District No. 2377, south of Mikado, Saskatchewan, the Ukrainian word for "harmony".
    Zoria School District No. 3471, west of Mayfair, Saskatchewan, the Ukrainian word for "dawn".

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Mr. Hack, @Gerard1234

  804. @Mr. XYZ
    Off-topic, but in regards to the EU specifically, having an almost Muslim-free zone in the Eastern part of the EU (specifically in Intermarium) allows Europeans to larp as traditional folks while still being a part of a world-power:

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/25/Islam_in_Europe-2010.svg/690px-Islam_in_Europe-2010.svg.png

    Replies: @Wokechoke

    Malmo (handgrenade gangland Istanbul North) and Istanbul are the two choke points that make a mockery of this Muslim Free Zone guff. The Poles can’t ship goods out without the say so of the Umma at this point. Even Copenhagen is kinda far gone if you drive out to some of the burbs they have.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @Wokechoke

    Croatia is still within this almost Muslim-free zone and has its own ports.

    Replies: @Wokechoke

  805. @Mr. XYZ
    @LatW

    Do Russians strike you as being notoriously passive, in part possibly because the Bolsheviks killed and/or exiled all of the brave people among them?

    Replies: @Wokechoke

    They are obviously wary of importing Western Utopias like Marxism and Reaganomics any longer.

    “Oh! If only we did this abstraction right this time; why we’d all be rich and happy, this time.”

  806. AP says:
    @Gerard1234
    @Mr. Hack

    They never thought of , or called themselves "Ukrainians" you retarded paedophile, Hack.

    They never thought of the people living around the Dnieper as the same people as them, you retarded paedophile, Hack.

    I already mentioned about the lack of ANY Ukrainian place names, like there are in North America for plenty of Russian, Dutch, French, British, even Armenian diasporas. Because ukropism and Ukraine and Ukrainianism isn't real thing.....no places of settlement with their names.

    Replies: @AP

    I already mentioned about the lack of ANY Ukrainian place names, like there are in North America for plenty of Russian, Dutch, French, British, even Armenian diasporas.

    The list is as long as you record of idiocy. But what can one expect from a semi-retarded Sovok “engineer”?:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Canadian_place_names_of_Ukrainian_origin

    [MORE]

    Alberta

    Places in Edmonton
    Neighbourhoods
    Baturyn, Edmonton, after Baturyn, a historic castle town in northeastern Ukraine (Nizhyn Raion, Chernihiv Oblast).
    Oleskiw, Edmonton (formerly Wolf Willow Farms),[1] renamed in 1972 after Joseph Oleskiw (1860–1903), professor, writer and promoter of emigration.[2]
    Ozerna, Edmonton, literally “lake district”.[1]
    Pylypow Industrial subdivision, after Ivan Pylypow,[1] early pioneer.[3]
    Parks
    Oleskiw Park,[1] after Joseph Oleskiw (1860–1903), professor, writer and promoter of emigration
    Ukrainian Millennium Park (now Primrose Park), for 1989, the one thousandth anniversary of the Baptism of Kiev (the founding of Christianity in Ukraine).[1]
    William Hawrelak Park, after former Edmonton mayor William Hawrelak.[4]
    Roads
    Eleniak Road, Edmonton, after Wasyl Eleniak,[5] early pioneer.[1]
    Schools
    Bishop Greschuk Catholic Elementary School, an Edmonton Catholic separate school.
    Bishop Savaryn Catholic Elementary School, an Edmonton Catholic separate school named after Bishop Nicholas Savaryn, the first leader of the Ukrainian Catholic Eparchy of Edmonton.
    St. Vladimir Catholic Elementary School, an Edmonton Catholic separate school named after St. Volodymyr the Great.
    Rural communities
    Bellis, Alberta, “white woods”; referring to poplars and birch.[6]
    Borsczow, Alberta,[7] northeast of Ryley on Secondary Highway 626; Polonized spelling of Borshchiv, Borshchiv Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Buchach, Alberta, the Buczacz School District No. 2580,[8] and St. Nicholas Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church (Hlus’ Church), Buczacz; halfway between Innisfree and Musidora, Alberta off Secondary Highway 870 – from Buchach, Buchach Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Halych, Alberta (located in Westlock County, east of Tawatinaw[9]), from Halych – the historic city in Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast
    Ispas, Alberta,[10] southeast of Hamlin and northwest of Duvernay, Alberta on the south side of the North Saskatchewan River – after Ispas, Vyzhnytsia Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Jaroslaw School District No. 1478,[11] the Descent of the Holy Spirit Ukrainian Catholic Church, Jaroslaw;[12] and St. Demitrius Ukrainian Orthodox Church, Jaroslaw;[13] all northeast of Bruderheim, Alberta on Highway 38 – the Polish name of the city of Yaroslav, now in Jarosław County, Poland.[14]
    Kolomea, Alberta and the Kolomea School District No. 1507,[15] both southeast of Mundare, Alberta – phonetic spelling of Kolomyia, Kolomyia Raion, Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast.
    Lanuke, Alberta,[16] south of Two Hills off Highway 36 – possibly after a local family.
    Luzan, Alberta,[17] southwest of Andrew – after Luzhany, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Mazeppa, Alberta, northeast of High River and northwest of Blackie – the historical English spelling of the last name of Hetman Ivan Mazepa.
    Myrnam, Alberta, “peace to us”; from the Ukrainian word myr, “peace”.[18]
    New Kiew, Alberta and the Kiew School District No. 1693,[19] both north of Lavoy, Alberta off Secondary Highway 631 – German and Polish spelling of the capital city of Ukraine.
    Prosvita, Alberta, “enlightenment”; northeast of Athabasca and west of Grassland – possibly comes from the name of the Prosvita “Enlightenment” societies which started in Galicia in the 1860s.
    Shalka, Alberta,[20] north of Hairy Hill off Secondary Highway 645; after postmaster Matt (Dmytro) Shalka.
    Shandro, Alberta, northeast of Andrew off Secondary Highway 857 near the North Saskatchewan River – after the Shandro family from “Rus’kyi Banyliv”, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).[21]
    Shepenge, Alberta, the Szypenitz School District No. 1470,[22] and the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of St. Mary, Szypentiz; all northwest of Hairy Hill and northeast of Duvernay, Alberta off Secondary Highway 860 – after Shypyntsi, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Shishkovitzi was a locality southwest of Hilliard and southeast of Chipman, Alberta centering on St. Mary’s Holy Dormition Russo-Greek Orthodox Catholic Church[23] – named after Shyshkivtsi, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Slawa, Alberta, northeast of Myrnam on the Edmonton-to-Lloydminster branch line of the Canadian Pacific Railway[24] – Polonized spelling of the Ukrainian word “glory” (slava).
    Sniatyn, Alberta and the Sniatyn School District No. 1605,[25] both north of Andrew at the confluence of Limestone and Egg Creeks – after Sniatyn, Sniatyn Raion, Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast. Was originally named Hunka,[26] after a settler in the area from Bukovina, and located further upstream on Limestone Creek.
    Spaca Moskalyk was a locality northwest of Vegreville and northeast of Mundare, Alberta centered on the Transfiguration of Our Lord Ukrainian Catholic Church[27][28] – named after both Spas, Kalush Raion, Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast, and the Moskalyk family who donated part of their farmland for the church.
    Stry, Alberta and the Stry School District No. 2508,[29] both southeast of Vilna and northeast of Hamlin, Alberta – after Stryi, Stryi Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Ukalta, Alberta, north of Wostok off Secondary Highway 855 near the North Saskatchewan River – possibly a combination of “Ukrayina” and “Alberta”.
    Wasel, Alberta, west of Hamlin near the North Saskatchewan River on Highway 652[20] – Polonized spelling of the Ukrainian common name “Vasyl”.
    Wostok, Alberta, Polonized spelling of the Russian word vostok, “east” – named by Galician Russophile immigrant Theodore (Teodor) Nemirsky.[30]
    Zawale, Alberta and the Zawale School District No. 1074,[31] both south of Wostok, Alberta off Highway 29 – Polonized misspelling of Zavalya, Sniatyn Raion, Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast.
    Rural school districts
    Bavilla School District No. 1477,[32] part of the community of Wasel west of Hamlin, Alberta near the North Saskatchewan River – ?.
    Berhometh School District No. 1499,[33] northeast of Hairy Hill, Alberta – a misspelling of Berehomet, Vyzhnytsia Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Bohdan School District No. 3097,[8] south of Myrnam, Alberta – from the male given name Bohdan (“God-given”); possibly after Hetman Bohdan Khmelnytsky.
    Borowich School District No. 2052,[34] north of Willingdon, Alberta – possibly after a local family.
    Brody School District No. 1782,[35] northeast of Mundare, Alberta – after Brody, Brody Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Bukowina School District No. 1162,[36] northeast of Andrew, Alberta; German/Polish spelling of the Austrian crownland of Bukovina – part of which is now in Chernivtsi Oblast, Ukraine.
    Chernowci School No. 1456,[37] northeast of Wostok, Alberta – Polonized misspelling of the city of Chernivtsi, Ukraine.
    Chornik School District No. 2343,[34] northeast of Musidora, Alberta – possibly after a local family.
    Czahar School District No. 2322,[34][38] southwest of Willingdon, Alberta – Polonized spelling of the village of Chahor; now a part of the city of Chernivtsi, Ukraine.
    Ispas School District No. 2765,[33] southeast of Hamlin and northwest of Duvernay, Alberta on the south side of the North Saskatchewan River – after Ispas, Vyzhnytsia Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Koluz School District No. 1631,[33] east of Chipman, Alberta – a Polonized misspelling of Kalush, Kalush Raion, Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast.
    Kotzman School District No. 2325,[34] northeast of Smoky Lake, Alberta – the German spelling of Kitsman, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Krasnahora School District No. 2613,[8] south of Musidora, Alberta – a Ukrainian phrase meaning “beautiful hill”.
    Krasne School District No. 2245,[39] northeast of Lavoy and south of Two Hills, Alberta – the Ukrainian word for “beautiful”.
    Kysylew School District No. 1467,[40] northeast of Wostok, Alberta near the Limestone Creek[32] – a Polonized misspelling of Kyseliv, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Leszniw School District No. 2621,[8] south of Morecambe and northeast of Innisfree, Alberta – Polonized spelling of Leshniv, Brody Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Lwiw School District No. 1474,[41] southeast of St. Michael and northeast of Chipman, Alberta on Highway 29 – Polonized spelling of the city of Lviv, Ukraine.
    Luzan School District No. 2113,[34] halfway between Musidora, Alberta and the North Saskatchewan River – after Luzhany, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Miroslowna School District No. 2528,[34] northeast of Innisfree, Alberta – Polonized spelling of the Ukrainian word “miroslavna”, meaning “Glorified Peace”.
    Molodia School District No. 1486,[42] south of Andrew and north of Mundare, Alberta at the junction of Highway 29 and Secondary Highway 855 – after Molodiia, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Myrnam School District No. 2219, northwest of the modern townsite of Myrnam, Alberta – “peace to us”; from the Ukrainian word myr, “peace”.[43]
    Nizir School District No. 2179,[44] east of Two Hills, southeast of Duvernay and northwest of Musidora, Alberta – ?.
    Oleskow School District No. 1612,[45] southeast of Mundare, Alberta and west of Vegreville; after Joseph Oleskiw (1860–1903) – author of the pamphlets “On Free Lands” (Pro Vilni Zemli, spring 1895),[46][47] and “On Emigration” (O emigratsiy, December 1895).[2]
    Paraskevia School District No. 1487,[40] northeast of Hilliard and north of Mundare, Alberta on Secondary Highway 855[48] – possibly after one of the saints named Paraskevi.
    Peremysl School District No. 2944,[8] southeast of Radway, Alberta on the south side of the North Saskatchewan River on Secondary Highway 831 – a phonetic misspelling of the Ukrainian name (“Peremyshl”) for Przemyśl, Poland.[14]
    Podola School District No. 2065,[49] south of Hilliard and west of Mundare, Alberta near the Beaverhill Creek – Polonized spelling of the Ukrainian region of Podillia.
    Pobeda School District No. 1604,[33] southeast of Two Hills and west of Morecambe, Alberta – ?.
    Proswita School District No. 1563,[40] northeast of Star and northwest of St. Michael, Alberta off Highway 45[32] – Polonized spelling of the Ukrainian word for “enlightenment”; possibly after the Prosvita Society of Galicia.
    Provischena School District No. 1476,[40] south of Bellis, Alberta near the North Saskatchewan River[32] – possibly after the Ukrainian word for “prophecy” (provishchennya).
    Pruth School Division No. 2064,[34] northwest of Warwick, Alberta – after the Prut river in Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Radymno School District No. 2942,[8] part of the rural community of Leeshore east of Redwater, Alberta on the south side of the North Saskatchewan River – after the town of Radymno, now in Jarosław County, Poland.[14]
    Russia School District No. 2069,[34] south of Musidora, Alberta; from school board confusion over Rusyny / Ruthenian vs. Russki / Russian.
    Ruthenia School District No. 2408,[34] southeast of Smoky Lake and southwest of Bellis, Alberta – after the Austro-Hungarian name for the Ukrainian territories of Galicia, Bukovina, and Carpathian Ruthenia (now Transcarpathian Oblast).
    Shandro School District No. 1438, halfway between Willingdon, Alberta and the North Saskatchewan River – after the Shandro family from “Rus’kyi Banyliv”, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).[50]
    Sheptycki School District No. 2920,[8] southeast of Waskatenau, Alberta on the south side of the North Saskatchewan River – possibly after The Venerable Metropolitan Andrey Sheptytsky (1865–1944).
    Sherentz School District No. 2614,[8] south of Beauvallon and southwest of Myrnam, Alberta – possibly after Shyrivtsi, currently in Dnistrovskyi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Sich School District No. 1595,[51] northeast of Warwick, Alberta – after the fortresses of the Ukrainian Cossacks.
    Skeskowicz School District No. 1801,[34] southwest of Willingdon, Alberta – ?.
    Skowiatyn School District No. 2483,[34] northwest of Wostok, Alberta near the North Saskatchewan River – after Skoviatyn, Borshchiv Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Slawa School District No. 2400,[34] south of the old townsite of Slawa, Alberta – Polonized spelling of the Ukrainian word “glory” (slava).
    Stanislawow School District No. 1485,[40] northeast of Mundare, Alberta[48] – Polish spelling of the town of Stanislaviv, now Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine.
    Svit School District No. 1491,[40] east of Chipman and northeast of Hilliard, Alberta[52] – the Ukrainian word for “the world” or “light”.
    Svoboda School District No. 1479,[11] part of the rural community of Skaro northwest of St. Michael, Alberta at the junction of Highway 45 and Secondary Highway 831 – the Ukrainian word for “liberty”.
    Toporoutz School District No. 1935,[44] east of Warspite and southwest of Smoky Lake, Alberta – German spelling of Toporivtsi, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Ukraina School District No. 1672,[33] southeast of Hilliard and southwest of Mundare, Alberta – phonetic spelling of “Ukraine” in the Ukrainian language.
    Uhryn School District No. 2409,[34] southeast of Beauvallon and southwest of Myrnam, Alberta – possibly after one of nine places named “Uhryniv”[53] in Galicia.
    Vladymir School District No. 1217,[54] northwest of Mundare, Alberta – after district pioneer Vladymir Svarich (Volodymyr Zvarych).
    Wolie School District No. 2591,[8] west of Warwick, Alberta on the south shore of Bens Lake – Polonized misspelling of the Ukrainian word “freedom” (volya).
    Zaporoze School District No. 2246,[55] northeast of Lavoy, Alberta – a phonetic spelling of “Zaporizhzhia”; after the Zaporizhian Host of Ukrainian Cossacks.
    Zhoda School District No. 1498,[33] southeast of Willingdon and west of Hairy Hill, Alberta – the Ukrainian word for “harmony”.
    Zora School District No. 2487,[34] northwest of the modern townsite of Slawa, Alberta – possibly a misspelling of the Ukrainian word for “dawn” (zoria).

    Manitoba
    Rural communities
    Chortitz, Manitoba, south of Winkler off Highway 32; German spelling of Khortytsia island, located in the Dnipro river now within the city of Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine – Manitoba hamlet named by “Russian” Mennonite immigrants.
    Dneiper, Manitoba[56] (renamed “Fishing River”), east of Ukraina and northeast of Sifton – after the Dnipro river.
    Halicz, Manitoba,[57] northwest of Trembowla and north of Ashville near Highway 10 – a Polonized spelling of Halych, a historic Ukrainian city in Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast.
    Horod, Manitoba, north of Elphinstone on Provincial Road 354, near the south boundary of Riding Mountain National Park – the Ukrainian word for “city”.
    Jaroslaw, Manitoba, southwest of Hnausa; the Polish name of the city of Yaroslav, now in Jarosław County, Poland.[14]
    Komarno, Manitoba, the Ukrainian word for “mosquito” – possibly after Komarno, Horodok Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Kulish, Manitoba, northwest of Ethelbert; after Panteleimon Kulish (1819–1897).
    Medika, Manitoba, north of Hadashville on Provincial Road 507 – after Medyka on the present Polish-Ukrainian border.[14]
    Melnice, Manitoba, west of Dunnottar and southwest of Winnipeg Beach, at the junction of Highway 8 and Provincial Road 225 – the Ukrainian word for “windmill”.[58]
    Morweena, Manitoba, northwest of Arborg and southeast of Fisher Branch on Provincial Road 329 – ?.
    Okno, Manitoba, northwest of Riverton near Shorncliffe – the Ukrainian word for “window”.
    Oleskiw, Manitoba,[59] west of Stuartburn on Provincial Road 201; after Dr. Joseph Oleskiw (1860–1903) – author of the pamphlets “On Free Lands” (Pro Vilni Zemli, spring 1895),[46][47] and “On Emigration” (O emigratsiy, December 1895).[2]
    Olha, Manitoba,[59] east of Rossburn and north of Oakburn on Provincial Road 577; from female given name Olha (c.f. Russian “Olga”) – possibly after Princess Olha (c. 890–969).
    Ozerna, Manitoba, southeast of Erickson and northeast of Newdale – literally “lake district”.
    Petlura, Manitoba, at the junction of Provincial Road 366 and Provincial Road 584 near the north boundary of Riding Mountain National Park – after Ukrainian independence leader Symon Petliura (1879–1926).
    Prawda, Manitoba, southeast of Hadashville on the eastbound lanes of the Trans-Canada Highway; a Polonized spelling of the Ukrainian (and Russian) word pravda, “truth”.
    Ruthenia, Manitoba, northeast of Angusville and north of the Waywayseecappo townsite on Provincial Road 264, near the south boundary of Riding Mountain National Park – after the Austro-Hungarian name for the Ukrainian territories of Galicia, Bukovina, and Carpathian Ruthenia (now Transcarpathian Oblast).
    Seech, Manitoba, east of Olha and northwest of Elphinstone, near the south boundary of Riding Mountain National Park – a phonetic misspelling of the Ukrainian word “sich”; after the fortresses of the Ukrainian Cossacks.
    Senkiw, Manitoba, northwest of Roseau River and southwest of Rosa – possibly after a local family.
    Sirko, Manitoba,[60] south of Sundown near the Minnesota border – possibly after the Ukrainian Cossack leader Ivan Sirko (c. 1610–1680).
    Szewczenko, Manitoba (renamed “Vita”), west of Stuartburn on Provincial Road 201; a Polonized spelling of Taras Shevchenko’s last name.
    Trembowla, Manitoba, northwest of Dauphin on Provincial Road 491; the Polish spelling of Terebovlia, Terebovlya Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Ukraina, Manitoba,[61] southeast of Ethelbert and northwest of Sifton on Provincial Road 273; a phonetic spelling of “Ukraine” in the Ukrainian language.
    Vidir, Manitoba, northwest of Arborg on Provincial Road 233 – ?.
    Zbaraz, Manitoba, southeast of Fisher Branch and northwest of Arborg on Provincial Road 329 – a phonetic spelling of Zbarazh, Zbarazh Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Zelana, Manitoba, northeast of Ukraina and east of Ethelbert on Provincial Road 269 – a misspelling of the Ukrainian word for “green” (zelena).
    Zelena, Manitoba, northeast of Makaroff and west of the junction of Provincial Road 594 and Highway 83 – the Ukrainian word for “green”.
    Zhoda, Manitoba, north of Vita and southeast of Steinbach on Highway 12; the Ukrainian word for “harmony”.
    Zoria, Manitoba,[62] east of Sifton off Highway 10 – the Ukrainian word for “dawn”.

    Saskatchewan
    “Krassna” was a parish of German Roman Catholics[63] south of Leader, Saskatchewan – German spelling of Krasne, Izmail Raion, Odesa Oblast.
    St. Volodymyr Ukrainian Park, Saskatchewan, a campground owned by the Saskatoon branch of the Ukrainian Catholic Brotherhood of Canada; featuring a small Ukrainian Catholic church dedicated to St. Volodymyr.
    Places in Regina
    Schools
    Elsie Mironuck Community School in Regina, a public elementary school.
    W. S. Hawrylak School in Regina, a public elementary school.
    Places in Saskatoon
    Schools
    Bishop Filevich Ukrainian Bilingual School in Saskatoon, a Catholic separate school specializing in the study of the Ukrainian language, history and culture.
    Bishop Roborecki School in Saskatoon, a Catholic separate school named after Bishop Andriy Roboretsky, the first leader of the Ukrainian Catholic Eparchy of Saskatoon.
    St. Petro Mohyla Institute, Saskatoon, a private college for the study of the Ukrainian language, history and culture – after St. Petro Mohyla.
    St. Volodymyr School in Saskatoon, a Catholic separate school named after St. Volodymyr the Great.
    Rural communities
    Adamiwka School District No. 1994 and the Ukrainian Catholic Church of the Descent of the Holy Ghost, Adamiwka;[64] both southeast of Rosthern, Saskatchewan – after “Adamivka”,[65] now in Jarosław County, Poland.[14]
    Antoniwka was a locality north of Canora, Saskatchewan centered on the Ukrainian Catholic parish of the Assumption; named after Antonivka, Chortkiv Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    “Belyk’s” was a locality north of Borden, Saskatchewan centered on the “Ivan Franko National Home” – built on Yurko Belyk’s farmland[66] – and the Redberry Park rural post office; also the location of the Assumption of St. Mary Ukrainian Orthodox church.
    Beresina, Saskatchewan, northeast of Churchbridge; German spelling of “Berezyna” (now Rozdil[67] in Mykolaiv Raion), Lviv Oblast – Saskatchewan post office named by ethnic Germans from Galicia.
    Bobulynci was a locality southwest of Rose Valley, Saskatchewan centered on the Ukrainian Catholic parish of The Transfiguration – named after Bobulyntsi, Buchach Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Bodnari (or “Kolo Bodnariv”) was a locality northeast of Vonda, Saskatchewan named after Teodor Bodnar,[66] who donated part of his farmland to the Ukrainian Catholic parish of Saints Peter and Paul for a church.
    Buchach was a locality near Hazel Dell, Saskatchewan centered on the Ukrainian Catholic Church of the Patronage of the Blessed Virgin Mary; named after Buchach, Buchach Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Bukowina, Saskatchewan, south of Yellow Creek; German/Polish spelling of the Austrian crownland of Bukovina – part of which is now in Chernivtsi Oblast, Ukraine. Named by Bukovinian immigrant and postmaster John (Ivan) Fessiuk.[68]
    Byrtnyky was a locality between Kelvington and Endeavour, Saskatchewan named after one of three places named “Byrtnyky”[69] in Lviv Oblast.
    Chorney Beach, Saskatchewan, a resort beach at Fishing Lake southeast of Wadena; possibly after a local family.
    Chortitz, Saskatchewan, south of Swift Current on Highway 379; German spelling of Khortytsia island, located in the Dnipro river now within the city of Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine – Saskatchewan hamlet named by “Russian” Mennonite immigrants.
    Dmytruk Lake, north of Cree Lake; after Peter Dmytruk of Wynyard, Saskatchewan (aka “Pierre le Canadien”), a member of the Royal Canadian Air Force who served with the French Resistance after being shot down near Paris in 1943.[70]
    Dneiper, Saskatchewan, north of Rhein, after the Dnipro river.
    Dneister, Saskatchewan (renamed “Hamton”),[71] northeast of Rhein on Highway 650; after the Dniester river.
    Dobrowody, Saskatchewan and the Dobrowody School District No. 2637, both northeast of Rama, Saskatchewan – a Ukrainian phrase meaning “good water”; after a village of the same name (“Dobrovody”)[72] in Pidhaitsi Raion, Ternopil Oblast, Ukraine.
    Drobot, Saskatchewan, north of Theodore, after Thomas Drobot – postmaster from 1909 to 1917.
    Halyary, Saskatchewan, southwest of Preeceville – a Postmaster General/Government of Canada misspelling of “Halychy”.[73]
    Halycry School District No. 2835, also southwest of Preeceville, Saskatchewan – a Department of Education misspelling of “Halychy”.[73]
    Havryliuky was a locality south of Prud’homme, Saskatchewan named after Nicholas Hawryluk (Nykola Havryliuk),[66] who donated part of his farmland for Sacred Heart of Jesus Ukrainian Catholic Church.
    Hryhoriw School District No. 2390 and the Ukrainian Catholic parish of St. Demetrius, Hryhoriw; both south of Preeceville, Saskatchewan – after Hryhoriv, Buchach Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Hory (also called Carpenter-Hory) was a locality southwest of Wakaw, Saskatchewan centering on the Ukrainian Catholic parish of The Ascension of Our Lord Jesus Christ – after the Ukrainian word for “mountains” (“hori”).
    Janow School District No. 2842 and Janow Corners, Saskatchewan, both south of Meath Park; after a village called “Yaniv” (now Ivano-Frankove),[74] in Yavoriv Raion, Lviv Oblast, Ukraine.
    Kalyna, Saskatchewan, and the Kalyna School District No. 3945, both south of Meath Park, Saskatchewan – after the Ukrainian word for the “highbush cranberry”.
    Kiev was a locality southwest of Rose Valley, Saskatchewan centered on a Ukrainian Orthodox Church; named after the capital city of Ukraine.
    Kobzar School District No. 3597 and the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the Holy Ascension, Arran-Kobzar; both south of Arran, Saskatchewan – after the book of poems by Taras Shevchenko.
    Kolo Pidskal’noho (or “Pidskalny’s”) was a locality west of Cudworth, Saskatchewan named after Ivan Pidskalny,[75] who donated part of his farmland to the Ukrainian Catholic parish of St. Demetrius for a church.
    Kolo Solomyanoho was a locality west of Cudworth, Saskatchewan named after Ivan Solomyany,[75] who donated part of his farmland for the (unspecified) Ukrainian Church of the Holy Transfiguration.
    Kowalowka School District No. 1739 and the Ukrainian Catholic Church of The Transfiguration, Kovalivka; both northeast of Canora, Saskatchewan – after Kovalivka, Buchach Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Krasne, Saskatchewan, west of Wishart, the Ukrainian word for “beautiful”; after a village in Pidvolochysk Raion,[72] Ternopil Oblast, Ukraine.
    Krydor, Saskatchewan, after Peter (Petro) Krysak and Teodor Lucyk, local settlers.
    Krim was a locality south of Aberdeen, Saskatchewan and is the German spelling of the Crimean peninsula – named by “Russian” Mennonites from the Taurida Governorate of the Russian Empire, now Ukraine.
    Kulykiv was a locality north of Invermay, Saskatchewan named after Kulykiv, Zhovkva Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Kvitka, Saskatchewan, south of Jedburgh, after Gregory (Hryhory) Kvitka (1778–1843), Ukrainian novelist.
    Kyziv-Tiaziv, Saskatchewan, south of Rama, after Tiaziv, Tysmenytsia Raion, Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast.[76][77]
    Laniwci, Saskatchewan, and the Laniwci School District No. 2300, both west of Alvena, Saskatchewan – Polonized spelling of Lanivtsi, Borshchiv Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Lemberg, Saskatchewan, German name for Lviv, Ukraine – Saskatchewan town named by ethnic Germans from Galicia.
    Leskiw Lake, southwest of Creighton, Saskatchewan; after Anthony Leskiw of Saskatoon, “lost at sea in October 1940 while serving aboard SS Whitford Point, torpedoed in the north Atlantic by a German submarine”.[75]
    Malonek, Saskatchewan, and the Malonek School District No. 3669, both northeast of Pelly, Saskatchewan; perhaps after “Malynivka”[78] – now Malinówka, Brzozów County, Poland.[14]
    New Yaroslau, the name of a Ukrainian block settlement northeast of Yorkton, Saskatchewan; after the ancient city of Yaroslav – now in Jarosław County, Poland.[14]
    Odessa, Saskatchewan, after the city of Odesa, Ukraine – Saskatchewan village named by ethnic Germans from the neighbouring Bessarabia Governorate of the Russian Empire, which is today split between Moldova and Ukraine.
    Orolow, Saskatchewan (also called “Teshliuk’s”),[69] south of Krydor – Polonized misspelling of Ordiv, Radekhiv Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Paniowce, Saskatchewan (renamed “Swan Plain”[79]), north of Norquay on Highway 8 – Polonized misspelling of Panivtsi Zelene, Borshchiv Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Rak, Saskatchewan, northeast of Vonda on Highway 41 – after Joseph Rak[66] from Lanivtsi, Borshchiv Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Rebryna was a locality northeast of Hafford, Saskatchewan centered on the “Redberry Ivan Franko Library and Hall”, named after Paul (Pavlo) Rebryna.[66]
    Sich School District No. 3454, the Sich community hall and the Ukrainian Catholic parish of St. Michael, “Krydor Sich”; all west of Blaine Lake, Saskatchewan – after the fortresses of the Ukrainian Cossacks.
    Sokal, Saskatchewan, and the Sokal School District No. 1955, both west of Wakaw, Saskatchewan – named after Sokal, Sokal Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Stanislavtsi was a locality south of Foam Lake, Saskatchewan named after Stanislaviv (now Ivano-Frankivsk), Ukraine; also the location of the “Michael Hrushewski” community hall.
    Tarnopol, Saskatchewan, Polonized spelling of Ternopil, Ternopil Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Vasyliv (or “Kolo Vasyleva”) was a locality south of Buchanan, Saskatchewan centered on the Ukrainian Catholic parish of Saints Constantine and Helena; named after “N. Wasyliw”.[75]
    Vorobceve was a locality just west of Krydor, Saskatchewan centered on the Ukrainian Catholic Church of St. Demetrius; named after the Worobetz family.[80]
    Walawa, Saskatchewan, west of Theodore; Polonized spelling of “Valiava” – now in Przemyśl County, Poland.[14]
    Welechko (or “Bilya Velychka”) was a locality south of Hafford, Saskatchewan, named after Ivan Welechko[66] – who donated part of his farmland to the Ukrainian Catholic parish of The Presentation for a church; also the location of the “Taras Shewchenko” community hall.
    Whitkow, Saskatchewan, west of Mayfair on Highway 378, is an Anglo-Polonized spelling[81] of Vytkiv, Radekhiv Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Rural school districts
    Bereziw School District No. 3030 (changed to “Slawa School”),[78] south of Hafford, Saskatchewan; after the district (povit) of “Bereziv” – now Brzozów County, Poland.[14]
    Bogucz School District No. 1743, southeast of Canora, Saskatchewan; possibly after “Bohusa” – now Bogusza,[78] Nowy Sącz County, Poland.[14]
    Bohdan School District No. 3511, east of Mayfair, Saskatchewan; from the male given name Bohdan (“God-given”) – possibly after Bohdan Khmelnytsky.
    Bridok School District No. 1765, south of Canora, Saskatchewan, after Bridok, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Bukowina School District No. 2012, southeast of Wakaw, Saskatchewan; German/Polish spelling of the Austrian crownland of Bukovina – part of which is now in Chernivtsi Oblast, Ukraine.
    Cheremosz School District No. 4004, north of Endeavour, Saskatchewan, after the Cheremosh river that separated Galicia and Bukovina.
    Crimea School District No. 4195, southwest of Eatonia, Saskatchewan, after the peninsula in the Black Sea – School named by ethnic Germans from the Taurida Governorate of the Russian Empire, now Ukraine.
    Czernawka School District No. 1712, north of MacNutt, Saskatchewan; Polonized misspelling of “Cherniavka” – now Czerniawka,[78] in Jarosław County, Poland.[14]
    Dnister School District No. 1635, southwest of Canora, Saskatchewan, after the Dniester river.
    Dobraniwka School District No. 2608, southeast of Rosthern, Saskatchewan; a Polonized variation of the Ukrainian phrase for “extremely good”[82] (“dobraniv”).
    Drahomanow School District No. 2501, southeast of Prud’homme, Saskatchewan, after Mykhailo Drahomanov (1841–1895).
    Fedoruk School District No. 2342, southwest of Veregin, Saskatchewan, after school trustee Nicoli (Mykola) Fedoruk.[83]
    Fosti School District No. 1700, south of Sheho, Saskatchewan, after school board treasurer John (Ivan) Fosti.[84]
    Franko School District No. 1740, east of Canora, Saskatchewan, after Ivan Franko (1856–1916).
    Halicz School District No. 3204, northwest of Wishart, Saskatchewan; Polonized spelling of the historic Ukrainian city in Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast – named by a “Mr. Bodnarchuk”.[85]
    Horodenka School District No. 1845, west of Wakaw, Saskatchewan, after Horodenka, Kolomyia Raion, Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast.
    Horosziwci School District No. 2433 (renamed “War End School”),[78] west of Theodore, Saskatchewan; possibly after “Horokhivtsi” – now in Przemyśl County, Poland.[14]
    Husiatyn School District No. 791 (renamed “Claytonville School”),[86] south of Meath Park, Saskatchewan, after Husiatyn, Husiatyn Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Jablonow School District No. 1672 (renamed “Wroxton School”)[87] at Wroxton, Saskatchewan – Polonized spelling of Yabloniv, Kolomyia Raion, Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast.
    Jarema School District No. 1731, north of Calder, Saskatchewan, possibly after the town of Yaremche[87] in Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast.
    Kaminka School District No. 1632 at Tway, Saskatchewan, after “Kaminka”/Kamianka-Buzka, Kamianka-Buzka Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Kiev School District No. 1728 (originally “Kyjiw”), north of Alvena, Saskatchewan – after the capital city of Ukraine.
    Kitzman Scholl District No. 2400, northeast of Rhein, Saskatchewan, after Kitsman, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Kolomyia School District No. 1878, west of Wakaw, Saskatchewan, after Kolomyia, Kolomyia Raion, Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast.
    Krasne School District No. 3058, south of Hafford, Saskatchewan – the Ukrainian word for “beautiful”.
    Krasny School District No. 1121, southwest of Sheho, Saskatchewan – also after the Ukrainian word for “beautiful”.
    Larisa School District No. 5186, west of Wishart, Saskatchewan, after Larysa Kosach-Kvitka (Lesia Ukrainka, 1871–1913).
    Lodi School District No. 3509, north of Okla, Saskatchewan, the Ukrainian word for “ice”.
    Luzan School District No. 255, south of Veregin, Saskatchewan, after Luzhany, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Lysenko School District No. 494, at Insinger, Saskatchewan, after Mykola Lysenko (1842–1912).
    Mazeppa School District No. 2860, southeast of Canora, Saskatchewan, after Hetman Ivan Mazepa.
    Monastyr School District No. 2328, north of Buchanan, Saskatchewan, after Monastyryska, Monastyryska Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Mostetz School District No. 1734, northwest of Calder, Saskatchewan, Germanic spelling[88] of “Mostyshche”/Mostyska, Mostyska Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Nauka School District No. 3059, south of Hafford, Saskatchewan – the Ukrainian word for “learning”.
    Nichlava School District No. 1877 (formerly “Heuboden School”),[89] southeast of Rosthern, Saskatchewan, after the Nichlava river in Ternopil Oblast.
    Odessa School District No. 2327, south of Tramping Lake, Saskatchewan; after the city of Odesa, Ukraine – School named by ethnic Germans from the neighbouring Bessarabia Governorate of the Russian Empire, which is today split between Moldova and Ukraine.
    Oleskow School District No. 540, north of Rhein, Saskatchewan, after Joseph Oleskiw (1860–1903) – author of the pamphlets “On Free Lands” (Pro Vilni Zemli, spring 1895),[46][47] and “On Emigration” (O emigratsiy, December 1895).[2]
    Orolow School District No. 2392, south of Krydor, Saskatchewan – a Department of Education misspelling of Ordiv, Radekhiv Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Osin School District No. 3598, north of Arran, Saskatchewan, the Ukrainian word for “autumn”.
    Oukraina School District No. 2402, west of Krydor, Saskatchewan – a Department of Education phonetic spelling of Ukrayina (Ukraine).
    Ozeriany School District No. 2722 (renamed “Carpathian School”), south of Cudworth, Saskatchewan – the Ukrainian word for “from the lake”; after one of four places named “Ozeriany”[90] in Galicia.
    Paniowce School District No. 291 (renamed “Swan Plain School”),[79] north of Norquay, Saskatchewan on Highway 8 – Polonized misspelling of Panivtsi Zelene, Borshchiv Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Paseika School District No. 2419, south of Arran, Saskatchewan – a Department of Education phonetic spelling of “pasika”; a Ukrainian word for “beehive” or “apiary”.
    Podole School District No. 3227, northeast of Prince Albert, Saskatchewan – the Polish spelling of the Ukrainian region of Podillia.
    Podolia School District No. 2384, northeast of Arran, Saskatchewan – a misspelling of the Ukrainian region of Podillia.
    Pohorlowtz School District No. 2578, southwest of Sheho, Saskatchewan – Germanic misspelling[74] of Pohoril’tsi, Peremyshliany Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Poltawa School District No. 2335 (renamed “Carpenter School”),[91] northeast of Cudworth, Saskatchewan; Polonized spelling of the city of Poltava, Ukraine – probably after the famous battle in 1709.
    Probizna School District No. 1724 (renamed “Geddes School”),[86] northeast of Wroxton, Saskatchewan, after Probizhna, Chortkiv Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Prosvita School District No. 3457, west of Mayfair, Saskatchewan, after the Prosvita Society in Galicia.
    Radimno School District No. 2682, southeast of Willowbrook, Saskatchewan; after the town of Radymno, now in Jarosław County, Poland.[14]
    Rak School District No. 3244, northeast of Vonda, Saskatchewan on Highway 41 – after Joseph Rak[66] from Lanivtsi, Borshchiv Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Rus School District No. 2584, south of Hafford, Saskatchewan, after Kievan Rus’.
    Ruthenia School District No. 404, southwest of Cudworth, Saskatchewan; after the Austro-Hungarian name for the Ukrainian territories of Galicia, Bukovina, and Carpathian Ruthenia (now Transcarpathian Oblast).
    Sambor School District No. 4057, northeast of Dysart, Saskatchewan; Polonized spelling of Sambir, Sambir Raion, Lviv Oblast – School named by ethnic Germans from Galicia.
    Scalat School District No. 1623, southeast of Canora, Saskatchewan – misspelling of Skalat, Pidvolochysk Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Siczynski School District No. 2513, near Meacham, Saskatchewan – Polonized spelling of the last name of Ukrainian composer and conductor Denys Sichynsky (1865–1909).[92]
    Skala School District No. 2712, west of Cudworth, Saskatchewan – after Skala-Podilska, Borshchiv Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Slawa School District No. 3030 (formerly “Bereziw School”),[78] south of Hafford, Saskatchewan – Polonized spelling of the Ukrainian word “glory” (slava).
    Sniatyn School District No. 1729, west of Wakaw, Saskatchewan, after Sniatyn, Sniatyn Raion, Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast.
    Stanisloff School District No. 3105, south of Foam Lake, Saskatchewan – a Department of Education phonetic misspelling of “Stanislav”, after Stanislaviv (now Ivano-Frankivsk), Ukraine.
    Stawchan School District No. 1826, north of Rhein, Saskatchewan – a Polonized misspelling of Stavchany, Horodok Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Stryj School District No. 3201, north of Goodeve, Saskatchewan – German/Polish spelling of Stryi, Stryi Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Svoboda School District No. 1704, northwest of Alvena, Saskatchewan – the Ukrainian word for “liberty”.
    Taras School District No. 4880, north of Gronlid, Saskatchewan, after Taras Shevchenko.
    Toporoutz School District No. 1666 (renamed “Chaucer School”),[68] north of Calder, Saskatchewan – German spelling of Toporivtsi, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Torsk School District No. 1713, east of Calder, Saskatchewan – after Torske, Zalishchyky Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Vasloutz School District No. 2642, south of Buchanan, Saskatchewan – Germanic misspelling of Vasylkivtsi,[79] Husiatyn Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Verenczanka School District No. 264 (renamed “New Canadian School”),[68] east of Rhein, Saskatchewan – Polonized spelling of Verenchanka, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Vesna School District No. 736, southeast of Arran, Saskatchewan, the Ukrainian word for “spring (season)”.
    Verbowska School District No. 1737, north of MacNutt, Saskatchewan; a Polonized misspelling of Verbivka, Borshchiv Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Vladimir School District No. 2193, west of Alvena, Saskatchewan, after St. Volodymyr the Great.
    Wasileff School District No. 1692 (renamed “Yemen School”),[68] west of Insinger, Saskatchewan – an Anglo-Polonized spelling of Vasyliv, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Whitkow School District No. 4508 and Whitkow Hamlet School District No. 5118, both west of Mayfair, Saskatchewan on Highway 378; an Anglo-Polonized spelling[81] of Vytkiv, Radekhiv Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Wisnia School District No. 2870, southeast of Veregin, Saskatchewan – Polonized misspelling of the Vyshnia river in Lviv Oblast.
    Wolia School District No. 3503, southwest of Glaslyn, Saskatchewan – Polonized spelling of the Ukrainian word “freedom” (volya).
    Wolna School District No. 3503, east of Rama, Saskatchewan – Polonized spelling of the Ukrainian word “free” (vilna).
    Wysla School District No. 4106, southwest of Canora, Saskatchewan – Polonized misspelling of the Ukrainian word (Vysla) for the Vistula river.
    Zamok School District No. 784, south of Meath Park, Saskatchewan, after Zamok, Zhovkva Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Zaporoze School District No. 3188, west of Krydor, Saskatchewan – a Department of Education phonetic spelling of “Zaporizhzhia”;[93] after the Zaporizhian Host of Ukrainian Cossacks.
    Zayacz School District No. 3416 (renamed “Liberal School”), north of Calder, Saskatchewan, after school trustee “A. Zayacz”[94] (Zayach?).
    Zazula School District No. 4526, northwest of Hendon, Saskatchewan, after district pioneer Fred Zazula.[75]
    Zbaraz School District No. 2403, south of Krydor, Saskatchewan, a misspelling of Zbarazh, Zbarazh Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Zhoda School District No. 2377, south of Mikado, Saskatchewan, the Ukrainian word for “harmony”.
    Zoria School District No. 3471, west of Mayfair, Saskatchewan, the Ukrainian word for “dawn”.

    • Thanks: Mr. XYZ, Mr. Hack
    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @AP

    Thanks for that!

    You can also see Ukrainian-Canadian areas on an ethnic map of Canada in the middle of Canada:

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/91/Canada_ethnic_origin_map_2021.png

    , @Mr. Hack
    @AP

    Geraldina shows again that he (she?) is an intellectual lightweight that should limit his activities towards weeding his garden and playing chopsticks on the piano. As his sexual orientation has long been under suspicion, he should be rather easy for Karlin to recruit into his new "internationalist coalition". :-)

    , @Gerard1234
    @AP

    LMAO. As is expected, this fantasist, fuckwit lowlife who has never been to Ukraine, Russia, Europe, and possibly even outside of its mother's basement........ is that pitiful it blindly ( or probably for deliberate disinformation purposes) links some article , that only further shows this idiot doesn't speak a word of Ukrainian or Russian.....it proves EXACTLY what I was saying.


    Of course , Ivan Sirko "sure" ukrop nationalists from the west are going to name place after him! That "typical", ancient ukrop word of "Lemburg", LMAO. That typical ukrainian letter of W featured in several of these names you dumb fuck! As I said, this idiot disseminates filth he hasn't even read or certainly doesn't understand.

    As can be deciphered after about 10 seconds of looking through this fantasists BS, there is not even ONE village, before we even get to town which is "Ukrainian".

    What we have are predominantly - Poles or Russian names of places you retard. You would think a useless scumbag as yourself would stay far away from the word "mir" given one of your other plentiful disasters exposing yourself involving that word.....but we are dealing with a sociopathic scumtroll here.

    We do have places named after settlers ( that's completely different you dumb prick, even for ukronazis, expecting all of them to be useless is naive) for what they have done in Canada.......and if as they emigrated they even viewed themselves as "Ukrainian" is highly unlikely

    St. Vladimir Catholic Elementary School - LOL, where to start with this? Uniate heretic faggots using Vladimir the Great for Catholic purposes...oh...and that its Vladimir not Volodomyr

    So with out any actual places, this retard is forced into pitifully having this link that is reduced to "localities", literally a place where somebody has taken a shit in an open field, and had some 1940s-50s highly insecure banderatard falsely edit them onto a wikipedia page to classify these nonexistent places based on this puddle and shit in a field. I clicked on 3 of them, and of course NONE of them were actually called what this fake BS on wikipedia links them as.

    School district, WTF? How pathetic is this.

    Odessa, Krim, a million other clearly Polish places. As seen in this retards idiotic discussion with the excellent Beckow about nobility, he links deliberate fake BS that in zero way supports his lie.....and it just shows how dumb the retards who linked to it are.

    And where is the US, on this list? Interesting in that this sack of shit being American is about the only thing not false about this freak. Normally this freak invents a fake relative to "support" his fake argument, but with this he can't even fake a Canadian he knows living in these so-called diaspora areas.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @AP

  807. @Wokechoke
    @Mr. XYZ

    Malmo (handgrenade gangland Istanbul North) and Istanbul are the two choke points that make a mockery of this Muslim Free Zone guff. The Poles can't ship goods out without the say so of the Umma at this point. Even Copenhagen is kinda far gone if you drive out to some of the burbs they have.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    Croatia is still within this almost Muslim-free zone and has its own ports.

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @Mr. XYZ

    Bari and Bar are overrun with blacks on one side and Montenegrins on the other.

    A better map would show where the Muslims have taken over ports and other coastal cities.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

  808. @Anatoly Karlin
    @Mr. XYZ


    What exactly makes you think that LatW (who is a woman, BTW) is a neocon?
     
    I'm aware. I was delineating a broad category; LatW is a Nazi more specifically. (On average, womyn have far better political instincts than m*noids, but there are exceptions).

    The RDK are unironic Nazis, homophobes, and misogynists.

    https://antifascist-europe.org/russia/russian-volunteer-corps-denis-whiterex-is-back-in-business/

    No normal person would associate with the scum (the only defensible if cynical form of cooperation with them from an EHC perspective would be to "utilize" them as cannon fodder against stronger regressive forces and lock up any survivors under hate crimes charges when they outlive their usefulness).

    Replies: @S, @Mr. XYZ, @Mr. XYZ

    Where specifically has LatW identified with Nazi ideology other than by arguing that Jews are a mixed blessing for the West?

    The RDK are unironic Nazis, homophobes, and misogynists.

    Well, Russian nationalists are Nazi-lite (cultural genocide rather than physical genocide of Ukrainians), homophobes, and sometimes misogynists as well (if one considers Putin to be a Russian nationalist):

    https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/576807-putin-directs-sexist-remark-at-us-anchor/

    At least Western aid money and the prospect of EU membership has a chance of making the RDK behave better, no? Didn’t Azov moderate a bit over the years once it got infused with less radical new members? They might still have Nazi symbols, but largely for show at this point in time, no?

    The RDK aren’t that much different from Russian nationalists, other than them being anti-imperialist, both at home and abroad:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_Volunteer_Corps

    “The RVC says it is made up of ethnic Russians fighting to defend Ukraine against Russia’s invasion and to overthrow the government of Vladimir Putin.[1] It asserts Russia’s government should abandon its imperial ambitions and instead focus on improving the well-being of ethnic Russians. The RVC say they believe in self-determination for Russia’s various ethnic minorities and “want to see a smaller, ethnic Russian state”.[4][12][13]”

    No normal person would associate with the scum (the only defensible if cynical form of cooperation with them from an EHC perspective would be to “utilize” them as cannon fodder against stronger regressive forces and lock up any survivors under hate crimes charges when they outlive their usefulness).

    First Russia would need to bring back Article 282. Or join the EU, but even then, I don’t know if there are general EU hate speech laws that also apply to EU countries that don’t have specific hate speech laws of their own. (And EHC rejects hate speech laws or is at least ambivalent towards them.)

    Anyway, I’m not super-eager for the RVC to come to power in Russia, but I still can’t help wonder if they could do a better job of governing Russia than Putin would. There is some evidence that authoritarian regimes can be good for countries’ birth rates, especially if they are capable of mass mobilizing their population behind particular ideologies (as Putin’s regime is clearly incapable of doing):

    https://emilkirkegaard.dk/en/2022/01/authoritarianism-and-fertility-maybe-probably/

    That’s not to say that I would be particularly *happy* about Russia remaining an authoritarian state. I just think that if that’s going to be Russia’s fate in any case, then it should be run by people who are anti-imperialist and who have a chance of being better for Russian TFR relative to the Putin regime.

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @Mr. XYZ

    She’s a Bazi or Baltic Nationalist of some kind. Though she also welcomes the negrification of Europe and appears to eagerly await things like Niggers in Paris, but this time Niggers in Riga and Vilnius.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    , @LatW
    @Mr. XYZ


    At least Western aid money and the prospect of EU membership has a chance of making the RDK behave better, no?
     
    There won't be a prospect of EU membership. Most likely also no democracy. That was a very, very naive hope.

    But if there was a prospect of reconciliation with Europe, then RDK would compromise for the sake of being in a coalition together with a larger force. In the scenario that they do survive, they will have to compromise even with a larger nationalist force - depending on who comes on top. They will need cover. However, it is likely that the FSB will come on top eventually anyway, in which case it would not be advisable for them to stay in Russia, but to go back to Ukraine instead (unless, as I said, they get a really good cover).

    And, no, they are not misogynist but anti-feminist. And very strongly against non-European immigration, trannyism, against what they call in EE juvenile justice (separation of families for trivial reasons).

    They may come out with a political program at some point, again, if they survive, frankly, right now they don't have much time for this.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

  809. Re: Fertility: The Nazis were total pieces of shit, but if they would have been more generic nationalists (no anti-Semitism or mass murder or forced sterilizations or anti-LGBTQ+ policies), then they would have been much better, especially considering their positive effects on fertility:

    German TFR:

    1932: 1.70
    1933: 1.67
    1934: 2.07
    1935: 2.20
    1936: 2.25
    1937: 2.28
    1938: 2.45
    1939: 2.59
    1940: 2.59

    In 1940, Nazi Germany was quite arguably at its peak. A TFR increase of 0.89 children in just eight years!

    Austrian TFR:

    1938: 1.92
    1939: 2.86
    1940: 2.70

    The Nazi German annexation of Austria achieved the same effect in record time!

    Any Russian leader who is capable of achieving such progress–say, move Russia’s TFR from 1.7 to 2.5 (it’s now 1.2 but it was 1.7 a decade ago, I think)–would be quite admirable so long as they do not engage in significant human rights abuses. This would benefit the right in the sense that Russia would get even more EU parliamentary representation if Russia were to ever subsequently join the EU.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
    @Mr. XYZ

    Re: Fertility: The Nazis were total pieces of shit, but if they would have been more generic nationalists (no anti-Semitism or mass murder or forced sterilizations or anti-LGBTQ+ policies), then they would have been much better, especially considering their positive effects on fertility

    Hitler put the country on a positive track and then started a world war.

    They would be the top economy if he stopped at the Munich agreement and then took Hungary/Romania. Or attacked the USSR in 1939 which is what the British conservatives wanted him to do.

    But he always had plans for war. He wrote about Germany needed to take land from the East and he wanted revenge over WW1.

    He at least understood the importance of pro-natal policies while the dwarf of Moscow shrugs as the Slavic population continues to decline. Russia has the world's highest abortion rate and the homicidal dwarf is more concerned with getting his picture next to Peter. Well it ain't happening dwarf, you're a loser Tsar like Nicholas II. There will be no Putin the Great. It will be Putin the War Dunce.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @AP

    , @Dmitry
    @Mr. XYZ

    This date is not accurate. If you look at complete fertility rates, it was below replacement rate in the Nazi Germany years.

    Some your other texts are inaccurate as well. You seem to think fertility rate is easily changed. You are writing strange comments about the motives for the invasion with Ukraine, you also still continue to write about "economies of scale" after I already explained to you this is incorrect.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

  810. @Ivashka the fool
    @Sean

    I never wrote about Pynya being a perv. Although he was frolicking around while married, most probably he was the one who inseminated the BND agent "Balcony" Anchen that was close friends with Lyudmila and him. His son would be now a grown-up man in Germany. And I believe Zapol'skyi when he says that he saw a video of a man looking like Pynya giving a matchbox to a BND agent in a park in Dresden in 1989. It is not a well known fact, but Pynya was discharged from the KGB in 1990, and that was not because he left the CPSU as he claims. That's why we was driving a taxi in Piter before being picked up by Sobchak. My hypothesis is that his German contacts in the BND helped getting him in the right place. Piter was the place to be at the time, the most active RF sea port for trade with Germany. Sobchak had a lot of foreign friends but he was not a practical man, he needed a more crafty individual capable of doing the dirty work.

    Replies: @Sean

    He doubtless denied himself nothing after attaining supreme power, but I am dubious about Putin mixing business with pleasure while he was a KGB agent, of even head of the FSB. When he was 17, so the story goes he went to the KGB building and asked how he could become one of them, and was advised to get a law degree. Supposedly the ‘Sportsman’ gangster/rapist/ martial arts coach helped getting him a place in University. But a lot of those Sobchak taught must have been aspiring KGB so he had some connections, and Putin got to be a Lt. Col. I think for Russia in those days Putin was a rare combination of someone considered reliable by the military industrial security complex and with knowledge of Germany plus he speaks German fluently. People had not enough to eat in St Petersburg then, and yet arms factory warehouses were full of valuable raw materials including precius metals. Putin was ideal to oversee the sale of raw materials for food, Sobchak was not a very practical man, and Putin must have done well because Sobchak recommended him to Yeltsin, for a job in bowels of the Kremlin managing the property department. . Putin is not impulsive, doesn’t even drink; I think he got to rise through being am apparent natural underling-perceived as someone who would stay in his lane and be properly gratefully to his benefactors forever after.

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @Sean

    It were Chubais and Berezovskyi that brought him first to Yeltsin'a daughter who was the gateway to her ailing drunkard papa. But before meeting Yeltsin, Pynya got along well with the mafia boss Barsukov from the Tambov bratky gang. The reason why Pynya got along with Barsukov that well, was that he understood that big bucks needed be made at the time in the Sovok which was morphing into RusFed. That it was the only thing that mattered. Actually, it is still the only thing that matters to him and his circle, they are materialistic hedonists at their very core. Ideology, philosophy, power, to them are just a packaging, good for the lokhy - the naive imbeciles that exist only to be manipulated, used and abused. As the Blatnoy saying goes: the lokh isn't like the mammoth, it will never go extinct...

    Anyone who thinks that Pynya is a Russian Nationalist, an Imperialist, an ideologically driven person of any kind - anyone who thinks that - is a lokh that doesn't know squat about RusFed.

    https://youtu.be/r5BcWKcn84Y

    Pelevin summarized it in the scene above. Pynya and his circle, some of whom were already in Yeltsin's service, privatized Russia, downgraded it to their scum-tier level of understanding, and made it into RusFed where they are the parasitic elite. That's about it. Not much worth discussing really.

    Replies: @Another Polish Perspective

  811. @Emil Nikola Richard
    @Sean

    Some of the comments on that video are gold.

    Replies: @Sean

    Yes, I wondered what the delay with the bear looking and sort of shaking its head before attacking was about, but a commenter explained “the bear had to process his stupidity”.

    In the Ukraine too, there was a delay in reacting.

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @Sean

    The bear did nothing wrong...

  812. @AP
    @Gerard1234


    I already mentioned about the lack of ANY Ukrainian place names, like there are in North America for plenty of Russian, Dutch, French, British, even Armenian diasporas.
     
    The list is as long as you record of idiocy. But what can one expect from a semi-retarded Sovok "engineer"?:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Canadian_place_names_of_Ukrainian_origin



    Alberta

    Places in Edmonton
    Neighbourhoods
    Baturyn, Edmonton, after Baturyn, a historic castle town in northeastern Ukraine (Nizhyn Raion, Chernihiv Oblast).
    Oleskiw, Edmonton (formerly Wolf Willow Farms),[1] renamed in 1972 after Joseph Oleskiw (1860–1903), professor, writer and promoter of emigration.[2]
    Ozerna, Edmonton, literally "lake district".[1]
    Pylypow Industrial subdivision, after Ivan Pylypow,[1] early pioneer.[3]
    Parks
    Oleskiw Park,[1] after Joseph Oleskiw (1860–1903), professor, writer and promoter of emigration
    Ukrainian Millennium Park (now Primrose Park), for 1989, the one thousandth anniversary of the Baptism of Kiev (the founding of Christianity in Ukraine).[1]
    William Hawrelak Park, after former Edmonton mayor William Hawrelak.[4]
    Roads
    Eleniak Road, Edmonton, after Wasyl Eleniak,[5] early pioneer.[1]
    Schools
    Bishop Greschuk Catholic Elementary School, an Edmonton Catholic separate school.
    Bishop Savaryn Catholic Elementary School, an Edmonton Catholic separate school named after Bishop Nicholas Savaryn, the first leader of the Ukrainian Catholic Eparchy of Edmonton.
    St. Vladimir Catholic Elementary School, an Edmonton Catholic separate school named after St. Volodymyr the Great.
    Rural communities
    Bellis, Alberta, "white woods"; referring to poplars and birch.[6]
    Borsczow, Alberta,[7] northeast of Ryley on Secondary Highway 626; Polonized spelling of Borshchiv, Borshchiv Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Buchach, Alberta, the Buczacz School District No. 2580,[8] and St. Nicholas Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church (Hlus' Church), Buczacz; halfway between Innisfree and Musidora, Alberta off Secondary Highway 870 - from Buchach, Buchach Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Halych, Alberta (located in Westlock County, east of Tawatinaw[9]), from Halych - the historic city in Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast
    Ispas, Alberta,[10] southeast of Hamlin and northwest of Duvernay, Alberta on the south side of the North Saskatchewan River - after Ispas, Vyzhnytsia Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Jaroslaw School District No. 1478,[11] the Descent of the Holy Spirit Ukrainian Catholic Church, Jaroslaw;[12] and St. Demitrius Ukrainian Orthodox Church, Jaroslaw;[13] all northeast of Bruderheim, Alberta on Highway 38 - the Polish name of the city of Yaroslav, now in Jarosław County, Poland.[14]
    Kolomea, Alberta and the Kolomea School District No. 1507,[15] both southeast of Mundare, Alberta - phonetic spelling of Kolomyia, Kolomyia Raion, Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast.
    Lanuke, Alberta,[16] south of Two Hills off Highway 36 - possibly after a local family.
    Luzan, Alberta,[17] southwest of Andrew - after Luzhany, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Mazeppa, Alberta, northeast of High River and northwest of Blackie - the historical English spelling of the last name of Hetman Ivan Mazepa.
    Myrnam, Alberta, "peace to us"; from the Ukrainian word myr, "peace".[18]
    New Kiew, Alberta and the Kiew School District No. 1693,[19] both north of Lavoy, Alberta off Secondary Highway 631 - German and Polish spelling of the capital city of Ukraine.
    Prosvita, Alberta, "enlightenment"; northeast of Athabasca and west of Grassland - possibly comes from the name of the Prosvita "Enlightenment" societies which started in Galicia in the 1860s.
    Shalka, Alberta,[20] north of Hairy Hill off Secondary Highway 645; after postmaster Matt (Dmytro) Shalka.
    Shandro, Alberta, northeast of Andrew off Secondary Highway 857 near the North Saskatchewan River - after the Shandro family from "Rus'kyi Banyliv", Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).[21]
    Shepenge, Alberta, the Szypenitz School District No. 1470,[22] and the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of St. Mary, Szypentiz; all northwest of Hairy Hill and northeast of Duvernay, Alberta off Secondary Highway 860 - after Shypyntsi, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Shishkovitzi was a locality southwest of Hilliard and southeast of Chipman, Alberta centering on St. Mary's Holy Dormition Russo-Greek Orthodox Catholic Church[23] - named after Shyshkivtsi, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Slawa, Alberta, northeast of Myrnam on the Edmonton-to-Lloydminster branch line of the Canadian Pacific Railway[24] - Polonized spelling of the Ukrainian word "glory" (slava).
    Sniatyn, Alberta and the Sniatyn School District No. 1605,[25] both north of Andrew at the confluence of Limestone and Egg Creeks - after Sniatyn, Sniatyn Raion, Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast. Was originally named Hunka,[26] after a settler in the area from Bukovina, and located further upstream on Limestone Creek.
    Spaca Moskalyk was a locality northwest of Vegreville and northeast of Mundare, Alberta centered on the Transfiguration of Our Lord Ukrainian Catholic Church[27][28] - named after both Spas, Kalush Raion, Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast, and the Moskalyk family who donated part of their farmland for the church.
    Stry, Alberta and the Stry School District No. 2508,[29] both southeast of Vilna and northeast of Hamlin, Alberta - after Stryi, Stryi Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Ukalta, Alberta, north of Wostok off Secondary Highway 855 near the North Saskatchewan River - possibly a combination of "Ukrayina" and "Alberta".
    Wasel, Alberta, west of Hamlin near the North Saskatchewan River on Highway 652[20] - Polonized spelling of the Ukrainian common name "Vasyl".
    Wostok, Alberta, Polonized spelling of the Russian word vostok, "east" - named by Galician Russophile immigrant Theodore (Teodor) Nemirsky.[30]
    Zawale, Alberta and the Zawale School District No. 1074,[31] both south of Wostok, Alberta off Highway 29 - Polonized misspelling of Zavalya, Sniatyn Raion, Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast.
    Rural school districts
    Bavilla School District No. 1477,[32] part of the community of Wasel west of Hamlin, Alberta near the North Saskatchewan River - ?.
    Berhometh School District No. 1499,[33] northeast of Hairy Hill, Alberta - a misspelling of Berehomet, Vyzhnytsia Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Bohdan School District No. 3097,[8] south of Myrnam, Alberta - from the male given name Bohdan ("God-given"); possibly after Hetman Bohdan Khmelnytsky.
    Borowich School District No. 2052,[34] north of Willingdon, Alberta - possibly after a local family.
    Brody School District No. 1782,[35] northeast of Mundare, Alberta - after Brody, Brody Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Bukowina School District No. 1162,[36] northeast of Andrew, Alberta; German/Polish spelling of the Austrian crownland of Bukovina - part of which is now in Chernivtsi Oblast, Ukraine.
    Chernowci School No. 1456,[37] northeast of Wostok, Alberta - Polonized misspelling of the city of Chernivtsi, Ukraine.
    Chornik School District No. 2343,[34] northeast of Musidora, Alberta - possibly after a local family.
    Czahar School District No. 2322,[34][38] southwest of Willingdon, Alberta - Polonized spelling of the village of Chahor; now a part of the city of Chernivtsi, Ukraine.
    Ispas School District No. 2765,[33] southeast of Hamlin and northwest of Duvernay, Alberta on the south side of the North Saskatchewan River - after Ispas, Vyzhnytsia Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Koluz School District No. 1631,[33] east of Chipman, Alberta - a Polonized misspelling of Kalush, Kalush Raion, Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast.
    Kotzman School District No. 2325,[34] northeast of Smoky Lake, Alberta - the German spelling of Kitsman, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Krasnahora School District No. 2613,[8] south of Musidora, Alberta - a Ukrainian phrase meaning "beautiful hill".
    Krasne School District No. 2245,[39] northeast of Lavoy and south of Two Hills, Alberta - the Ukrainian word for "beautiful".
    Kysylew School District No. 1467,[40] northeast of Wostok, Alberta near the Limestone Creek[32] - a Polonized misspelling of Kyseliv, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Leszniw School District No. 2621,[8] south of Morecambe and northeast of Innisfree, Alberta - Polonized spelling of Leshniv, Brody Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Lwiw School District No. 1474,[41] southeast of St. Michael and northeast of Chipman, Alberta on Highway 29 - Polonized spelling of the city of Lviv, Ukraine.
    Luzan School District No. 2113,[34] halfway between Musidora, Alberta and the North Saskatchewan River - after Luzhany, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Miroslowna School District No. 2528,[34] northeast of Innisfree, Alberta - Polonized spelling of the Ukrainian word "miroslavna", meaning "Glorified Peace".
    Molodia School District No. 1486,[42] south of Andrew and north of Mundare, Alberta at the junction of Highway 29 and Secondary Highway 855 - after Molodiia, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Myrnam School District No. 2219, northwest of the modern townsite of Myrnam, Alberta - "peace to us"; from the Ukrainian word myr, "peace".[43]
    Nizir School District No. 2179,[44] east of Two Hills, southeast of Duvernay and northwest of Musidora, Alberta - ?.
    Oleskow School District No. 1612,[45] southeast of Mundare, Alberta and west of Vegreville; after Joseph Oleskiw (1860–1903) - author of the pamphlets "On Free Lands" (Pro Vilni Zemli, spring 1895),[46][47] and "On Emigration" (O emigratsiy, December 1895).[2]
    Paraskevia School District No. 1487,[40] northeast of Hilliard and north of Mundare, Alberta on Secondary Highway 855[48] - possibly after one of the saints named Paraskevi.
    Peremysl School District No. 2944,[8] southeast of Radway, Alberta on the south side of the North Saskatchewan River on Secondary Highway 831 - a phonetic misspelling of the Ukrainian name ("Peremyshl") for Przemyśl, Poland.[14]
    Podola School District No. 2065,[49] south of Hilliard and west of Mundare, Alberta near the Beaverhill Creek - Polonized spelling of the Ukrainian region of Podillia.
    Pobeda School District No. 1604,[33] southeast of Two Hills and west of Morecambe, Alberta - ?.
    Proswita School District No. 1563,[40] northeast of Star and northwest of St. Michael, Alberta off Highway 45[32] - Polonized spelling of the Ukrainian word for "enlightenment"; possibly after the Prosvita Society of Galicia.
    Provischena School District No. 1476,[40] south of Bellis, Alberta near the North Saskatchewan River[32] - possibly after the Ukrainian word for "prophecy" (provishchennya).
    Pruth School Division No. 2064,[34] northwest of Warwick, Alberta - after the Prut river in Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Radymno School District No. 2942,[8] part of the rural community of Leeshore east of Redwater, Alberta on the south side of the North Saskatchewan River - after the town of Radymno, now in Jarosław County, Poland.[14]
    Russia School District No. 2069,[34] south of Musidora, Alberta; from school board confusion over Rusyny / Ruthenian vs. Russki / Russian.
    Ruthenia School District No. 2408,[34] southeast of Smoky Lake and southwest of Bellis, Alberta - after the Austro-Hungarian name for the Ukrainian territories of Galicia, Bukovina, and Carpathian Ruthenia (now Transcarpathian Oblast).
    Shandro School District No. 1438, halfway between Willingdon, Alberta and the North Saskatchewan River - after the Shandro family from "Rus'kyi Banyliv", Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).[50]
    Sheptycki School District No. 2920,[8] southeast of Waskatenau, Alberta on the south side of the North Saskatchewan River - possibly after The Venerable Metropolitan Andrey Sheptytsky (1865–1944).
    Sherentz School District No. 2614,[8] south of Beauvallon and southwest of Myrnam, Alberta - possibly after Shyrivtsi, currently in Dnistrovskyi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Sich School District No. 1595,[51] northeast of Warwick, Alberta - after the fortresses of the Ukrainian Cossacks.
    Skeskowicz School District No. 1801,[34] southwest of Willingdon, Alberta - ?.
    Skowiatyn School District No. 2483,[34] northwest of Wostok, Alberta near the North Saskatchewan River - after Skoviatyn, Borshchiv Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Slawa School District No. 2400,[34] south of the old townsite of Slawa, Alberta - Polonized spelling of the Ukrainian word "glory" (slava).
    Stanislawow School District No. 1485,[40] northeast of Mundare, Alberta[48] - Polish spelling of the town of Stanislaviv, now Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine.
    Svit School District No. 1491,[40] east of Chipman and northeast of Hilliard, Alberta[52] - the Ukrainian word for "the world" or "light".
    Svoboda School District No. 1479,[11] part of the rural community of Skaro northwest of St. Michael, Alberta at the junction of Highway 45 and Secondary Highway 831 - the Ukrainian word for "liberty".
    Toporoutz School District No. 1935,[44] east of Warspite and southwest of Smoky Lake, Alberta - German spelling of Toporivtsi, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Ukraina School District No. 1672,[33] southeast of Hilliard and southwest of Mundare, Alberta - phonetic spelling of "Ukraine" in the Ukrainian language.
    Uhryn School District No. 2409,[34] southeast of Beauvallon and southwest of Myrnam, Alberta - possibly after one of nine places named "Uhryniv"[53] in Galicia.
    Vladymir School District No. 1217,[54] northwest of Mundare, Alberta - after district pioneer Vladymir Svarich (Volodymyr Zvarych).
    Wolie School District No. 2591,[8] west of Warwick, Alberta on the south shore of Bens Lake - Polonized misspelling of the Ukrainian word "freedom" (volya).
    Zaporoze School District No. 2246,[55] northeast of Lavoy, Alberta - a phonetic spelling of "Zaporizhzhia"; after the Zaporizhian Host of Ukrainian Cossacks.
    Zhoda School District No. 1498,[33] southeast of Willingdon and west of Hairy Hill, Alberta - the Ukrainian word for "harmony".
    Zora School District No. 2487,[34] northwest of the modern townsite of Slawa, Alberta - possibly a misspelling of the Ukrainian word for "dawn" (zoria).

    Manitoba
    Rural communities
    Chortitz, Manitoba, south of Winkler off Highway 32; German spelling of Khortytsia island, located in the Dnipro river now within the city of Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine - Manitoba hamlet named by "Russian" Mennonite immigrants.
    Dneiper, Manitoba[56] (renamed "Fishing River"), east of Ukraina and northeast of Sifton - after the Dnipro river.
    Halicz, Manitoba,[57] northwest of Trembowla and north of Ashville near Highway 10 - a Polonized spelling of Halych, a historic Ukrainian city in Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast.
    Horod, Manitoba, north of Elphinstone on Provincial Road 354, near the south boundary of Riding Mountain National Park - the Ukrainian word for "city".
    Jaroslaw, Manitoba, southwest of Hnausa; the Polish name of the city of Yaroslav, now in Jarosław County, Poland.[14]
    Komarno, Manitoba, the Ukrainian word for "mosquito" - possibly after Komarno, Horodok Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Kulish, Manitoba, northwest of Ethelbert; after Panteleimon Kulish (1819–1897).
    Medika, Manitoba, north of Hadashville on Provincial Road 507 - after Medyka on the present Polish-Ukrainian border.[14]
    Melnice, Manitoba, west of Dunnottar and southwest of Winnipeg Beach, at the junction of Highway 8 and Provincial Road 225 - the Ukrainian word for "windmill".[58]
    Morweena, Manitoba, northwest of Arborg and southeast of Fisher Branch on Provincial Road 329 - ?.
    Okno, Manitoba, northwest of Riverton near Shorncliffe - the Ukrainian word for "window".
    Oleskiw, Manitoba,[59] west of Stuartburn on Provincial Road 201; after Dr. Joseph Oleskiw (1860–1903) - author of the pamphlets "On Free Lands" (Pro Vilni Zemli, spring 1895),[46][47] and "On Emigration" (O emigratsiy, December 1895).[2]
    Olha, Manitoba,[59] east of Rossburn and north of Oakburn on Provincial Road 577; from female given name Olha (c.f. Russian "Olga") - possibly after Princess Olha (c. 890–969).
    Ozerna, Manitoba, southeast of Erickson and northeast of Newdale - literally "lake district".
    Petlura, Manitoba, at the junction of Provincial Road 366 and Provincial Road 584 near the north boundary of Riding Mountain National Park - after Ukrainian independence leader Symon Petliura (1879–1926).
    Prawda, Manitoba, southeast of Hadashville on the eastbound lanes of the Trans-Canada Highway; a Polonized spelling of the Ukrainian (and Russian) word pravda, "truth".
    Ruthenia, Manitoba, northeast of Angusville and north of the Waywayseecappo townsite on Provincial Road 264, near the south boundary of Riding Mountain National Park - after the Austro-Hungarian name for the Ukrainian territories of Galicia, Bukovina, and Carpathian Ruthenia (now Transcarpathian Oblast).
    Seech, Manitoba, east of Olha and northwest of Elphinstone, near the south boundary of Riding Mountain National Park - a phonetic misspelling of the Ukrainian word "sich"; after the fortresses of the Ukrainian Cossacks.
    Senkiw, Manitoba, northwest of Roseau River and southwest of Rosa - possibly after a local family.
    Sirko, Manitoba,[60] south of Sundown near the Minnesota border - possibly after the Ukrainian Cossack leader Ivan Sirko (c. 1610–1680).
    Szewczenko, Manitoba (renamed "Vita"), west of Stuartburn on Provincial Road 201; a Polonized spelling of Taras Shevchenko's last name.
    Trembowla, Manitoba, northwest of Dauphin on Provincial Road 491; the Polish spelling of Terebovlia, Terebovlya Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Ukraina, Manitoba,[61] southeast of Ethelbert and northwest of Sifton on Provincial Road 273; a phonetic spelling of "Ukraine" in the Ukrainian language.
    Vidir, Manitoba, northwest of Arborg on Provincial Road 233 - ?.
    Zbaraz, Manitoba, southeast of Fisher Branch and northwest of Arborg on Provincial Road 329 - a phonetic spelling of Zbarazh, Zbarazh Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Zelana, Manitoba, northeast of Ukraina and east of Ethelbert on Provincial Road 269 - a misspelling of the Ukrainian word for "green" (zelena).
    Zelena, Manitoba, northeast of Makaroff and west of the junction of Provincial Road 594 and Highway 83 - the Ukrainian word for "green".
    Zhoda, Manitoba, north of Vita and southeast of Steinbach on Highway 12; the Ukrainian word for "harmony".
    Zoria, Manitoba,[62] east of Sifton off Highway 10 - the Ukrainian word for "dawn".


    Saskatchewan
    "Krassna" was a parish of German Roman Catholics[63] south of Leader, Saskatchewan - German spelling of Krasne, Izmail Raion, Odesa Oblast.
    St. Volodymyr Ukrainian Park, Saskatchewan, a campground owned by the Saskatoon branch of the Ukrainian Catholic Brotherhood of Canada; featuring a small Ukrainian Catholic church dedicated to St. Volodymyr.
    Places in Regina
    Schools
    Elsie Mironuck Community School in Regina, a public elementary school.
    W. S. Hawrylak School in Regina, a public elementary school.
    Places in Saskatoon
    Schools
    Bishop Filevich Ukrainian Bilingual School in Saskatoon, a Catholic separate school specializing in the study of the Ukrainian language, history and culture.
    Bishop Roborecki School in Saskatoon, a Catholic separate school named after Bishop Andriy Roboretsky, the first leader of the Ukrainian Catholic Eparchy of Saskatoon.
    St. Petro Mohyla Institute, Saskatoon, a private college for the study of the Ukrainian language, history and culture - after St. Petro Mohyla.
    St. Volodymyr School in Saskatoon, a Catholic separate school named after St. Volodymyr the Great.
    Rural communities
    Adamiwka School District No. 1994 and the Ukrainian Catholic Church of the Descent of the Holy Ghost, Adamiwka;[64] both southeast of Rosthern, Saskatchewan - after "Adamivka",[65] now in Jarosław County, Poland.[14]
    Antoniwka was a locality north of Canora, Saskatchewan centered on the Ukrainian Catholic parish of the Assumption; named after Antonivka, Chortkiv Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    "Belyk's" was a locality north of Borden, Saskatchewan centered on the "Ivan Franko National Home" - built on Yurko Belyk's farmland[66] - and the Redberry Park rural post office; also the location of the Assumption of St. Mary Ukrainian Orthodox church.
    Beresina, Saskatchewan, northeast of Churchbridge; German spelling of "Berezyna" (now Rozdil[67] in Mykolaiv Raion), Lviv Oblast - Saskatchewan post office named by ethnic Germans from Galicia.
    Bobulynci was a locality southwest of Rose Valley, Saskatchewan centered on the Ukrainian Catholic parish of The Transfiguration - named after Bobulyntsi, Buchach Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Bodnari (or "Kolo Bodnariv") was a locality northeast of Vonda, Saskatchewan named after Teodor Bodnar,[66] who donated part of his farmland to the Ukrainian Catholic parish of Saints Peter and Paul for a church.
    Buchach was a locality near Hazel Dell, Saskatchewan centered on the Ukrainian Catholic Church of the Patronage of the Blessed Virgin Mary; named after Buchach, Buchach Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Bukowina, Saskatchewan, south of Yellow Creek; German/Polish spelling of the Austrian crownland of Bukovina - part of which is now in Chernivtsi Oblast, Ukraine. Named by Bukovinian immigrant and postmaster John (Ivan) Fessiuk.[68]
    Byrtnyky was a locality between Kelvington and Endeavour, Saskatchewan named after one of three places named "Byrtnyky"[69] in Lviv Oblast.
    Chorney Beach, Saskatchewan, a resort beach at Fishing Lake southeast of Wadena; possibly after a local family.
    Chortitz, Saskatchewan, south of Swift Current on Highway 379; German spelling of Khortytsia island, located in the Dnipro river now within the city of Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine - Saskatchewan hamlet named by "Russian" Mennonite immigrants.
    Dmytruk Lake, north of Cree Lake; after Peter Dmytruk of Wynyard, Saskatchewan (aka "Pierre le Canadien"), a member of the Royal Canadian Air Force who served with the French Resistance after being shot down near Paris in 1943.[70]
    Dneiper, Saskatchewan, north of Rhein, after the Dnipro river.
    Dneister, Saskatchewan (renamed "Hamton"),[71] northeast of Rhein on Highway 650; after the Dniester river.
    Dobrowody, Saskatchewan and the Dobrowody School District No. 2637, both northeast of Rama, Saskatchewan - a Ukrainian phrase meaning "good water"; after a village of the same name ("Dobrovody")[72] in Pidhaitsi Raion, Ternopil Oblast, Ukraine.
    Drobot, Saskatchewan, north of Theodore, after Thomas Drobot - postmaster from 1909 to 1917.
    Halyary, Saskatchewan, southwest of Preeceville - a Postmaster General/Government of Canada misspelling of "Halychy".[73]
    Halycry School District No. 2835, also southwest of Preeceville, Saskatchewan - a Department of Education misspelling of "Halychy".[73]
    Havryliuky was a locality south of Prud'homme, Saskatchewan named after Nicholas Hawryluk (Nykola Havryliuk),[66] who donated part of his farmland for Sacred Heart of Jesus Ukrainian Catholic Church.
    Hryhoriw School District No. 2390 and the Ukrainian Catholic parish of St. Demetrius, Hryhoriw; both south of Preeceville, Saskatchewan - after Hryhoriv, Buchach Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Hory (also called Carpenter-Hory) was a locality southwest of Wakaw, Saskatchewan centering on the Ukrainian Catholic parish of The Ascension of Our Lord Jesus Christ - after the Ukrainian word for "mountains" ("hori").
    Janow School District No. 2842 and Janow Corners, Saskatchewan, both south of Meath Park; after a village called "Yaniv" (now Ivano-Frankove),[74] in Yavoriv Raion, Lviv Oblast, Ukraine.
    Kalyna, Saskatchewan, and the Kalyna School District No. 3945, both south of Meath Park, Saskatchewan - after the Ukrainian word for the "highbush cranberry".
    Kiev was a locality southwest of Rose Valley, Saskatchewan centered on a Ukrainian Orthodox Church; named after the capital city of Ukraine.
    Kobzar School District No. 3597 and the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the Holy Ascension, Arran-Kobzar; both south of Arran, Saskatchewan - after the book of poems by Taras Shevchenko.
    Kolo Pidskal'noho (or "Pidskalny's") was a locality west of Cudworth, Saskatchewan named after Ivan Pidskalny,[75] who donated part of his farmland to the Ukrainian Catholic parish of St. Demetrius for a church.
    Kolo Solomyanoho was a locality west of Cudworth, Saskatchewan named after Ivan Solomyany,[75] who donated part of his farmland for the (unspecified) Ukrainian Church of the Holy Transfiguration.
    Kowalowka School District No. 1739 and the Ukrainian Catholic Church of The Transfiguration, Kovalivka; both northeast of Canora, Saskatchewan - after Kovalivka, Buchach Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Krasne, Saskatchewan, west of Wishart, the Ukrainian word for "beautiful"; after a village in Pidvolochysk Raion,[72] Ternopil Oblast, Ukraine.
    Krydor, Saskatchewan, after Peter (Petro) Krysak and Teodor Lucyk, local settlers.
    Krim was a locality south of Aberdeen, Saskatchewan and is the German spelling of the Crimean peninsula - named by "Russian" Mennonites from the Taurida Governorate of the Russian Empire, now Ukraine.
    Kulykiv was a locality north of Invermay, Saskatchewan named after Kulykiv, Zhovkva Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Kvitka, Saskatchewan, south of Jedburgh, after Gregory (Hryhory) Kvitka (1778–1843), Ukrainian novelist.
    Kyziv-Tiaziv, Saskatchewan, south of Rama, after Tiaziv, Tysmenytsia Raion, Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast.[76][77]
    Laniwci, Saskatchewan, and the Laniwci School District No. 2300, both west of Alvena, Saskatchewan - Polonized spelling of Lanivtsi, Borshchiv Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Lemberg, Saskatchewan, German name for Lviv, Ukraine - Saskatchewan town named by ethnic Germans from Galicia.
    Leskiw Lake, southwest of Creighton, Saskatchewan; after Anthony Leskiw of Saskatoon, "lost at sea in October 1940 while serving aboard SS Whitford Point, torpedoed in the north Atlantic by a German submarine".[75]
    Malonek, Saskatchewan, and the Malonek School District No. 3669, both northeast of Pelly, Saskatchewan; perhaps after "Malynivka"[78] - now Malinówka, Brzozów County, Poland.[14]
    New Yaroslau, the name of a Ukrainian block settlement northeast of Yorkton, Saskatchewan; after the ancient city of Yaroslav - now in Jarosław County, Poland.[14]
    Odessa, Saskatchewan, after the city of Odesa, Ukraine - Saskatchewan village named by ethnic Germans from the neighbouring Bessarabia Governorate of the Russian Empire, which is today split between Moldova and Ukraine.
    Orolow, Saskatchewan (also called "Teshliuk's"),[69] south of Krydor - Polonized misspelling of Ordiv, Radekhiv Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Paniowce, Saskatchewan (renamed "Swan Plain"[79]), north of Norquay on Highway 8 - Polonized misspelling of Panivtsi Zelene, Borshchiv Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Rak, Saskatchewan, northeast of Vonda on Highway 41 - after Joseph Rak[66] from Lanivtsi, Borshchiv Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Rebryna was a locality northeast of Hafford, Saskatchewan centered on the "Redberry Ivan Franko Library and Hall", named after Paul (Pavlo) Rebryna.[66]
    Sich School District No. 3454, the Sich community hall and the Ukrainian Catholic parish of St. Michael, "Krydor Sich"; all west of Blaine Lake, Saskatchewan - after the fortresses of the Ukrainian Cossacks.
    Sokal, Saskatchewan, and the Sokal School District No. 1955, both west of Wakaw, Saskatchewan - named after Sokal, Sokal Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Stanislavtsi was a locality south of Foam Lake, Saskatchewan named after Stanislaviv (now Ivano-Frankivsk), Ukraine; also the location of the "Michael Hrushewski" community hall.
    Tarnopol, Saskatchewan, Polonized spelling of Ternopil, Ternopil Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Vasyliv (or "Kolo Vasyleva") was a locality south of Buchanan, Saskatchewan centered on the Ukrainian Catholic parish of Saints Constantine and Helena; named after "N. Wasyliw".[75]
    Vorobceve was a locality just west of Krydor, Saskatchewan centered on the Ukrainian Catholic Church of St. Demetrius; named after the Worobetz family.[80]
    Walawa, Saskatchewan, west of Theodore; Polonized spelling of "Valiava" - now in Przemyśl County, Poland.[14]
    Welechko (or "Bilya Velychka") was a locality south of Hafford, Saskatchewan, named after Ivan Welechko[66] - who donated part of his farmland to the Ukrainian Catholic parish of The Presentation for a church; also the location of the "Taras Shewchenko" community hall.
    Whitkow, Saskatchewan, west of Mayfair on Highway 378, is an Anglo-Polonized spelling[81] of Vytkiv, Radekhiv Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Rural school districts
    Bereziw School District No. 3030 (changed to "Slawa School"),[78] south of Hafford, Saskatchewan; after the district (povit) of "Bereziv" - now Brzozów County, Poland.[14]
    Bogucz School District No. 1743, southeast of Canora, Saskatchewan; possibly after "Bohusa" - now Bogusza,[78] Nowy Sącz County, Poland.[14]
    Bohdan School District No. 3511, east of Mayfair, Saskatchewan; from the male given name Bohdan ("God-given") - possibly after Bohdan Khmelnytsky.
    Bridok School District No. 1765, south of Canora, Saskatchewan, after Bridok, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Bukowina School District No. 2012, southeast of Wakaw, Saskatchewan; German/Polish spelling of the Austrian crownland of Bukovina - part of which is now in Chernivtsi Oblast, Ukraine.
    Cheremosz School District No. 4004, north of Endeavour, Saskatchewan, after the Cheremosh river that separated Galicia and Bukovina.
    Crimea School District No. 4195, southwest of Eatonia, Saskatchewan, after the peninsula in the Black Sea - School named by ethnic Germans from the Taurida Governorate of the Russian Empire, now Ukraine.
    Czernawka School District No. 1712, north of MacNutt, Saskatchewan; Polonized misspelling of "Cherniavka" - now Czerniawka,[78] in Jarosław County, Poland.[14]
    Dnister School District No. 1635, southwest of Canora, Saskatchewan, after the Dniester river.
    Dobraniwka School District No. 2608, southeast of Rosthern, Saskatchewan; a Polonized variation of the Ukrainian phrase for "extremely good"[82] ("dobraniv").
    Drahomanow School District No. 2501, southeast of Prud'homme, Saskatchewan, after Mykhailo Drahomanov (1841–1895).
    Fedoruk School District No. 2342, southwest of Veregin, Saskatchewan, after school trustee Nicoli (Mykola) Fedoruk.[83]
    Fosti School District No. 1700, south of Sheho, Saskatchewan, after school board treasurer John (Ivan) Fosti.[84]
    Franko School District No. 1740, east of Canora, Saskatchewan, after Ivan Franko (1856–1916).
    Halicz School District No. 3204, northwest of Wishart, Saskatchewan; Polonized spelling of the historic Ukrainian city in Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast - named by a "Mr. Bodnarchuk".[85]
    Horodenka School District No. 1845, west of Wakaw, Saskatchewan, after Horodenka, Kolomyia Raion, Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast.
    Horosziwci School District No. 2433 (renamed "War End School"),[78] west of Theodore, Saskatchewan; possibly after "Horokhivtsi" - now in Przemyśl County, Poland.[14]
    Husiatyn School District No. 791 (renamed "Claytonville School"),[86] south of Meath Park, Saskatchewan, after Husiatyn, Husiatyn Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Jablonow School District No. 1672 (renamed "Wroxton School")[87] at Wroxton, Saskatchewan - Polonized spelling of Yabloniv, Kolomyia Raion, Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast.
    Jarema School District No. 1731, north of Calder, Saskatchewan, possibly after the town of Yaremche[87] in Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast.
    Kaminka School District No. 1632 at Tway, Saskatchewan, after "Kaminka"/Kamianka-Buzka, Kamianka-Buzka Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Kiev School District No. 1728 (originally "Kyjiw"), north of Alvena, Saskatchewan - after the capital city of Ukraine.
    Kitzman Scholl District No. 2400, northeast of Rhein, Saskatchewan, after Kitsman, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Kolomyia School District No. 1878, west of Wakaw, Saskatchewan, after Kolomyia, Kolomyia Raion, Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast.
    Krasne School District No. 3058, south of Hafford, Saskatchewan - the Ukrainian word for "beautiful".
    Krasny School District No. 1121, southwest of Sheho, Saskatchewan - also after the Ukrainian word for "beautiful".
    Larisa School District No. 5186, west of Wishart, Saskatchewan, after Larysa Kosach-Kvitka (Lesia Ukrainka, 1871–1913).
    Lodi School District No. 3509, north of Okla, Saskatchewan, the Ukrainian word for "ice".
    Luzan School District No. 255, south of Veregin, Saskatchewan, after Luzhany, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Lysenko School District No. 494, at Insinger, Saskatchewan, after Mykola Lysenko (1842–1912).
    Mazeppa School District No. 2860, southeast of Canora, Saskatchewan, after Hetman Ivan Mazepa.
    Monastyr School District No. 2328, north of Buchanan, Saskatchewan, after Monastyryska, Monastyryska Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Mostetz School District No. 1734, northwest of Calder, Saskatchewan, Germanic spelling[88] of "Mostyshche"/Mostyska, Mostyska Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Nauka School District No. 3059, south of Hafford, Saskatchewan - the Ukrainian word for "learning".
    Nichlava School District No. 1877 (formerly "Heuboden School"),[89] southeast of Rosthern, Saskatchewan, after the Nichlava river in Ternopil Oblast.
    Odessa School District No. 2327, south of Tramping Lake, Saskatchewan; after the city of Odesa, Ukraine - School named by ethnic Germans from the neighbouring Bessarabia Governorate of the Russian Empire, which is today split between Moldova and Ukraine.
    Oleskow School District No. 540, north of Rhein, Saskatchewan, after Joseph Oleskiw (1860–1903) - author of the pamphlets "On Free Lands" (Pro Vilni Zemli, spring 1895),[46][47] and "On Emigration" (O emigratsiy, December 1895).[2]
    Orolow School District No. 2392, south of Krydor, Saskatchewan - a Department of Education misspelling of Ordiv, Radekhiv Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Osin School District No. 3598, north of Arran, Saskatchewan, the Ukrainian word for "autumn".
    Oukraina School District No. 2402, west of Krydor, Saskatchewan - a Department of Education phonetic spelling of Ukrayina (Ukraine).
    Ozeriany School District No. 2722 (renamed "Carpathian School"), south of Cudworth, Saskatchewan - the Ukrainian word for "from the lake"; after one of four places named "Ozeriany"[90] in Galicia.
    Paniowce School District No. 291 (renamed "Swan Plain School"),[79] north of Norquay, Saskatchewan on Highway 8 - Polonized misspelling of Panivtsi Zelene, Borshchiv Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Paseika School District No. 2419, south of Arran, Saskatchewan - a Department of Education phonetic spelling of "pasika"; a Ukrainian word for "beehive" or "apiary".
    Podole School District No. 3227, northeast of Prince Albert, Saskatchewan - the Polish spelling of the Ukrainian region of Podillia.
    Podolia School District No. 2384, northeast of Arran, Saskatchewan - a misspelling of the Ukrainian region of Podillia.
    Pohorlowtz School District No. 2578, southwest of Sheho, Saskatchewan - Germanic misspelling[74] of Pohoril'tsi, Peremyshliany Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Poltawa School District No. 2335 (renamed "Carpenter School"),[91] northeast of Cudworth, Saskatchewan; Polonized spelling of the city of Poltava, Ukraine - probably after the famous battle in 1709.
    Probizna School District No. 1724 (renamed "Geddes School"),[86] northeast of Wroxton, Saskatchewan, after Probizhna, Chortkiv Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Prosvita School District No. 3457, west of Mayfair, Saskatchewan, after the Prosvita Society in Galicia.
    Radimno School District No. 2682, southeast of Willowbrook, Saskatchewan; after the town of Radymno, now in Jarosław County, Poland.[14]
    Rak School District No. 3244, northeast of Vonda, Saskatchewan on Highway 41 - after Joseph Rak[66] from Lanivtsi, Borshchiv Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Rus School District No. 2584, south of Hafford, Saskatchewan, after Kievan Rus'.
    Ruthenia School District No. 404, southwest of Cudworth, Saskatchewan; after the Austro-Hungarian name for the Ukrainian territories of Galicia, Bukovina, and Carpathian Ruthenia (now Transcarpathian Oblast).
    Sambor School District No. 4057, northeast of Dysart, Saskatchewan; Polonized spelling of Sambir, Sambir Raion, Lviv Oblast - School named by ethnic Germans from Galicia.
    Scalat School District No. 1623, southeast of Canora, Saskatchewan - misspelling of Skalat, Pidvolochysk Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Siczynski School District No. 2513, near Meacham, Saskatchewan - Polonized spelling of the last name of Ukrainian composer and conductor Denys Sichynsky (1865–1909).[92]
    Skala School District No. 2712, west of Cudworth, Saskatchewan - after Skala-Podilska, Borshchiv Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Slawa School District No. 3030 (formerly "Bereziw School"),[78] south of Hafford, Saskatchewan - Polonized spelling of the Ukrainian word "glory" (slava).
    Sniatyn School District No. 1729, west of Wakaw, Saskatchewan, after Sniatyn, Sniatyn Raion, Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast.
    Stanisloff School District No. 3105, south of Foam Lake, Saskatchewan - a Department of Education phonetic misspelling of "Stanislav", after Stanislaviv (now Ivano-Frankivsk), Ukraine.
    Stawchan School District No. 1826, north of Rhein, Saskatchewan - a Polonized misspelling of Stavchany, Horodok Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Stryj School District No. 3201, north of Goodeve, Saskatchewan - German/Polish spelling of Stryi, Stryi Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Svoboda School District No. 1704, northwest of Alvena, Saskatchewan - the Ukrainian word for "liberty".
    Taras School District No. 4880, north of Gronlid, Saskatchewan, after Taras Shevchenko.
    Toporoutz School District No. 1666 (renamed "Chaucer School"),[68] north of Calder, Saskatchewan - German spelling of Toporivtsi, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Torsk School District No. 1713, east of Calder, Saskatchewan - after Torske, Zalishchyky Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Vasloutz School District No. 2642, south of Buchanan, Saskatchewan - Germanic misspelling of Vasylkivtsi,[79] Husiatyn Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Verenczanka School District No. 264 (renamed "New Canadian School"),[68] east of Rhein, Saskatchewan - Polonized spelling of Verenchanka, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Vesna School District No. 736, southeast of Arran, Saskatchewan, the Ukrainian word for "spring (season)".
    Verbowska School District No. 1737, north of MacNutt, Saskatchewan; a Polonized misspelling of Verbivka, Borshchiv Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Vladimir School District No. 2193, west of Alvena, Saskatchewan, after St. Volodymyr the Great.
    Wasileff School District No. 1692 (renamed "Yemen School"),[68] west of Insinger, Saskatchewan - an Anglo-Polonized spelling of Vasyliv, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Whitkow School District No. 4508 and Whitkow Hamlet School District No. 5118, both west of Mayfair, Saskatchewan on Highway 378; an Anglo-Polonized spelling[81] of Vytkiv, Radekhiv Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Wisnia School District No. 2870, southeast of Veregin, Saskatchewan - Polonized misspelling of the Vyshnia river in Lviv Oblast.
    Wolia School District No. 3503, southwest of Glaslyn, Saskatchewan - Polonized spelling of the Ukrainian word "freedom" (volya).
    Wolna School District No. 3503, east of Rama, Saskatchewan - Polonized spelling of the Ukrainian word "free" (vilna).
    Wysla School District No. 4106, southwest of Canora, Saskatchewan - Polonized misspelling of the Ukrainian word (Vysla) for the Vistula river.
    Zamok School District No. 784, south of Meath Park, Saskatchewan, after Zamok, Zhovkva Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Zaporoze School District No. 3188, west of Krydor, Saskatchewan - a Department of Education phonetic spelling of "Zaporizhzhia";[93] after the Zaporizhian Host of Ukrainian Cossacks.
    Zayacz School District No. 3416 (renamed "Liberal School"), north of Calder, Saskatchewan, after school trustee "A. Zayacz"[94] (Zayach?).
    Zazula School District No. 4526, northwest of Hendon, Saskatchewan, after district pioneer Fred Zazula.[75]
    Zbaraz School District No. 2403, south of Krydor, Saskatchewan, a misspelling of Zbarazh, Zbarazh Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Zhoda School District No. 2377, south of Mikado, Saskatchewan, the Ukrainian word for "harmony".
    Zoria School District No. 3471, west of Mayfair, Saskatchewan, the Ukrainian word for "dawn".

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Mr. Hack, @Gerard1234

    Thanks for that!

    You can also see Ukrainian-Canadian areas on an ethnic map of Canada in the middle of Canada:

  813. @Mr. XYZ
    @Wokechoke

    Croatia is still within this almost Muslim-free zone and has its own ports.

    Replies: @Wokechoke

    Bari and Bar are overrun with blacks on one side and Montenegrins on the other.

    A better map would show where the Muslims have taken over ports and other coastal cities.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @Wokechoke

    Croatia literally has virtually no blacks:

    https://i.redd.it/0512b934jlx81.jpg

    Replies: @Wokechoke

  814. @Mr. XYZ
    @Anatoly Karlin

    Where specifically has LatW identified with Nazi ideology other than by arguing that Jews are a mixed blessing for the West?


    The RDK are unironic Nazis, homophobes, and misogynists.
     
    Well, Russian nationalists are Nazi-lite (cultural genocide rather than physical genocide of Ukrainians), homophobes, and sometimes misogynists as well (if one considers Putin to be a Russian nationalist):

    https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/576807-putin-directs-sexist-remark-at-us-anchor/

    At least Western aid money and the prospect of EU membership has a chance of making the RDK behave better, no? Didn't Azov moderate a bit over the years once it got infused with less radical new members? They might still have Nazi symbols, but largely for show at this point in time, no?

    The RDK aren't that much different from Russian nationalists, other than them being anti-imperialist, both at home and abroad:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_Volunteer_Corps

    "The RVC says it is made up of ethnic Russians fighting to defend Ukraine against Russia's invasion and to overthrow the government of Vladimir Putin.[1] It asserts Russia's government should abandon its imperial ambitions and instead focus on improving the well-being of ethnic Russians. The RVC say they believe in self-determination for Russia's various ethnic minorities and "want to see a smaller, ethnic Russian state".[4][12][13]"

    No normal person would associate with the scum (the only defensible if cynical form of cooperation with them from an EHC perspective would be to “utilize” them as cannon fodder against stronger regressive forces and lock up any survivors under hate crimes charges when they outlive their usefulness).
     
    First Russia would need to bring back Article 282. Or join the EU, but even then, I don't know if there are general EU hate speech laws that also apply to EU countries that don't have specific hate speech laws of their own. (And EHC rejects hate speech laws or is at least ambivalent towards them.)

    Anyway, I'm not super-eager for the RVC to come to power in Russia, but I still can't help wonder if they could do a better job of governing Russia than Putin would. There is some evidence that authoritarian regimes can be good for countries' birth rates, especially if they are capable of mass mobilizing their population behind particular ideologies (as Putin's regime is clearly incapable of doing):

    https://emilkirkegaard.dk/en/2022/01/authoritarianism-and-fertility-maybe-probably/

    That's not to say that I would be particularly *happy* about Russia remaining an authoritarian state. I just think that if that's going to be Russia's fate in any case, then it should be run by people who are anti-imperialist and who have a chance of being better for Russian TFR relative to the Putin regime.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @LatW

    She’s a Bazi or Baltic Nationalist of some kind. Though she also welcomes the negrification of Europe and appears to eagerly await things like Niggers in Paris, but this time Niggers in Riga and Vilnius.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @Wokechoke

    Where exactly did she say that she awaits blacks in Paris? She opposes miscegenation, after all.

    Replies: @LatW

  815. S says:

    Unfortunately, as the tired old 18th century Capitalist vs Communist, Right vs Left, Conservative vs Liberal, etc, dialectic comes closer to it’s conclusion in a global Multi-Cultural synthesis, and the ushering in of the United States of the World looms ever nearer on the horizon, we’ll see more and more of the type thing depicted below…ie people short changing themselves and others for short term material and financial gain, under a mistaken belief that if they will just submit that ‘They’re gonna leave us alone.’

    A person who has made this mistake can of course have a chance at redeeming themselves by changing their life path…

    ‘It’s business, that’s all it is! There ain’t no countries anymore. No more good guys. They’re running the whole show, they own everything, the whole G_d dam_ed planet. They can do whatever they want. What’s wrong with having it good for a change? Now, they’re gonna let us have it good if we just help ’em They’re gonna leave us alone, let us make some money…We all sell out everyday, might as well be on the winning team!’

    [MORE]

    Added bonus…

    ‘Our projections show that by the year 2025, not only America, but the entire planet, will be under the protection, and the dominion, of this power alliance. The gains have been substantial, both for ourselves, and for you, the human power elite.’

    • Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
    @S

    https://youtu.be/d9cy19gzvn8

  816. @S
    Unfortunately, as the tired old 18th century Capitalist vs Communist, Right vs Left, Conservative vs Liberal, etc, dialectic comes closer to it's conclusion in a global Multi-Cultural synthesis, and the ushering in of the United States of the World looms ever nearer on the horizon, we'll see more and more of the type thing depicted below...ie people short changing themselves and others for short term material and financial gain, under a mistaken belief that if they will just submit that 'They're gonna leave us alone.'

    A person who has made this mistake can of course have a chance at redeeming themselves by changing their life path...


    'It's business, that's all it is! There ain't no countries anymore. No more good guys. They're running the whole show, they own everything, the whole G_d dam_ed planet. They can do whatever they want. What's wrong with having it good for a change? Now, they're gonna let us have it good if we just help 'em They're gonna leave us alone, let us make some money...We all sell out everyday, might as well be on the winning team!'


    https://youtu.be/JPhJo_BuVJc



    Added bonus...

    'Our projections show that by the year 2025, not only America, but the entire planet, will be under the protection, and the dominion, of this power alliance. The gains have been substantial, both for ourselves, and for you, the human power elite.'


    https://youtu.be/GeAcikP5N7M

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard

    • Thanks: S
  817. @LatW
    @Mr. XYZ

    I believe it's unrealistic to turn China against Russia, or Russia against China.

    As to the Russian freedom fighter groups, they are still in the minority - most Russians do not support their goals. The support is currently increasing, but they also have to share the nationalist niche with the likes of Prigo.

    As to radical life extension, they would probably not be against it per se, but these people want to live the natural way of life. They want to be heroes, not play gods.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @John Johnson

    As to the Russian freedom fighter groups, they are still in the minority – most Russians do not support their goals. The support is currently increasing, but they also have to share the nationalist niche with the likes of Prigo.

    Yes Putin has more support with the masses and they also have a completely controlled state media that tells them how to think. Journalists that question the war end up in prison.

    The freedom fighters would have majority support if Putin was forced to answer questions in an unscripted interview on how exactly is the war is in their best interest. Even in scripted interviews he messes up and can’t explain himself or keep a consistent justification. He is basically a scared little boy that is terrified of journalists asking questions and revealing the mediocre KGB paper pusher that pretends to be a confident leader.

    • Agree: Mr. XYZ
    • Disagree: Mikhail
    • Replies: @Mikel
    @John Johnson


    they also have a completely controlled state media that tells them how to think. Journalists that question the war end up in prison.
     
    I wonder where people like you (or your splitting images, the Western Putin fans like Anglin and McGregor) come from. Have you ever watched any popular Russian TV debate show subtitled in English, like Soloviov's? Just once? Do you know who Russian war correspondents Rybar and Wargonzo are and how their reporting is regularly used by Western pro-Ukrainian sources to provide objective information on the course of the war?

    Heck, are you even capable of processing the fact that right here we have just been visited by a notorious Moscow blogger who is publicly comparing Putin to a chimpanzee every day and actually promoting treason?

    With all the things one can criticize Putin and his regime for, why invent equivocal ones? And when one is engaged in such inventions, why choose the one that actually applies to the Ukrainians much more than to the Russians? Even on this blog we have the revealing fact that not one single ethnic Ukrainian, as far as I know, found it fit to criticize the Ukrainian government when it was killing its own civilians but we do have a number of Russians who criticized their government from the start of the war.

    Besides, Zelensky has just received Greta Thunberg's visit in Kiev and that's just too much, even for a lifelong pacifist like me. F*ck Kiev and all it stands for today.

    Replies: @Wielgus, @sudden death, @John Johnson

  818. @Sean
    @Ivashka the fool

    He doubtless denied himself nothing after attaining supreme power, but I am dubious about Putin mixing business with pleasure while he was a KGB agent, of even head of the FSB. When he was 17, so the story goes he went to the KGB building and asked how he could become one of them, and was advised to get a law degree. Supposedly the 'Sportsman' gangster/rapist/ martial arts coach helped getting him a place in University. But a lot of those Sobchak taught must have been aspiring KGB so he had some connections, and Putin got to be a Lt. Col. I think for Russia in those days Putin was a rare combination of someone considered reliable by the military industrial security complex and with knowledge of Germany plus he speaks German fluently. People had not enough to eat in St Petersburg then, and yet arms factory warehouses were full of valuable raw materials including precius metals. Putin was ideal to oversee the sale of raw materials for food, Sobchak was not a very practical man, and Putin must have done well because Sobchak recommended him to Yeltsin, for a job in bowels of the Kremlin managing the property department. . Putin is not impulsive, doesn't even drink; I think he got to rise through being am apparent natural underling-perceived as someone who would stay in his lane and be properly gratefully to his benefactors forever after.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

    It were Chubais and Berezovskyi that brought him first to Yeltsin’a daughter who was the gateway to her ailing drunkard papa. But before meeting Yeltsin, Pynya got along well with the mafia boss Barsukov from the Tambov bratky gang. The reason why Pynya got along with Barsukov that well, was that he understood that big bucks needed be made at the time in the Sovok which was morphing into RusFed. That it was the only thing that mattered. Actually, it is still the only thing that matters to him and his circle, they are materialistic hedonists at their very core. Ideology, philosophy, power, to them are just a packaging, good for the lokhy – the naive imbeciles that exist only to be manipulated, used and abused. As the Blatnoy saying goes: the lokh isn’t like the mammoth, it will never go extinct…

    Anyone who thinks that Pynya is a Russian Nationalist, an Imperialist, an ideologically driven person of any kind – anyone who thinks that – is a lokh that doesn’t know squat about RusFed.

    Pelevin summarized it in the scene above. Pynya and his circle, some of whom were already in Yeltsin’s service, privatized Russia, downgraded it to their scum-tier level of understanding, and made it into RusFed where they are the parasitic elite. That’s about it. Not much worth discussing really.

    • Replies: @Another Polish Perspective
    @Ivashka the fool

    I don't think Putin is a hedonist, he certainly isn't Caligula or Nero or Heliogabal. He is just a Sovok who has some money but lacks imagination what to do with them.


    But what was the reason for such a great rise of mafia in Russia after the fall of Soviet Union? It has always astonished me, taking into account how relatively "enlightened" Soviet Union culture was. One would expect that a multitude of social organisations would appear and thousands flowers of social activity would bloom, but in reality mainly weeds and bushes had arisen.
    It almost looked like Mexico, with some part of population almost having criminal tendencies, showing their innate brutality, and "being a criminal", even brutal one, becoming a respectable way of life.

    To compare, in Poland there was also a low-level mafia (more like large-scale trade with untaxed alcohol etc than muscle-based "rekiet") in the 90'ties, but it was largely defeated until Poland's EU accession.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

  819. @Mr. XYZ
    Re: Fertility: The Nazis were total pieces of shit, but if they would have been more generic nationalists (no anti-Semitism or mass murder or forced sterilizations or anti-LGBTQ+ policies), then they would have been much better, especially considering their positive effects on fertility:

    German TFR:

    1932: 1.70
    1933: 1.67
    1934: 2.07
    1935: 2.20
    1936: 2.25
    1937: 2.28
    1938: 2.45
    1939: 2.59
    1940: 2.59

    In 1940, Nazi Germany was quite arguably at its peak. A TFR increase of 0.89 children in just eight years!

    Austrian TFR:

    1938: 1.92
    1939: 2.86
    1940: 2.70

    The Nazi German annexation of Austria achieved the same effect in record time!

    Any Russian leader who is capable of achieving such progress--say, move Russia's TFR from 1.7 to 2.5 (it's now 1.2 but it was 1.7 a decade ago, I think)--would be quite admirable so long as they do not engage in significant human rights abuses. This would benefit the right in the sense that Russia would get even more EU parliamentary representation if Russia were to ever subsequently join the EU.

    Replies: @John Johnson, @Dmitry

    Re: Fertility: The Nazis were total pieces of shit, but if they would have been more generic nationalists (no anti-Semitism or mass murder or forced sterilizations or anti-LGBTQ+ policies), then they would have been much better, especially considering their positive effects on fertility

    Hitler put the country on a positive track and then started a world war.

    They would be the top economy if he stopped at the Munich agreement and then took Hungary/Romania. Or attacked the USSR in 1939 which is what the British conservatives wanted him to do.

    But he always had plans for war. He wrote about Germany needed to take land from the East and he wanted revenge over WW1.

    He at least understood the importance of pro-natal policies while the dwarf of Moscow shrugs as the Slavic population continues to decline. Russia has the world’s highest abortion rate and the homicidal dwarf is more concerned with getting his picture next to Peter. Well it ain’t happening dwarf, you’re a loser Tsar like Nicholas II. There will be no Putin the Great. It will be Putin the War Dunce.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @John Johnson

    Hitler didn't need to take anything after March 1939. He could have simply kept things as they were indefinitely and also opened Germany's borders wide open to any foreigner who was deemed sufficiently German and/or Germanizable. Hitler, however, dreamt much bigger than that and wanted to have much more Lebensraum so that Germany could have a much higher carrying capacity for its total population. It wasn't a bad idea, if one ignores the moral aspects of it as well as the practical difficulties of implementing it. But ultimately it ended up failing and Germany ended up being put in a much worse position than it was right before the start of World War II.

    Hitler wanted Germany to be a second America, only much more brutal. Can't say that his vision was not grand. But he ultimately ended up going down in history as a massive and epic failure who should have never come to power in Germany in the first place. Big dreams and ambitions sometimes end up dying in rather brutal, harsh, and crushing ways! :(

    @Ivashka: The bear wanted to seize human capital that did not rightfully belong to it. A bit like Hitler had he decided to invade the Netherlands in 1939.

    Replies: @John Johnson

    , @AP
    @John Johnson


    Well it ain’t happening dwarf, you’re a loser Tsar like Nicholas II.
     
    He is much worse than Nicholas II. Nicky oversaw population growth, innovation, more improvement and a better country under his rule He just made a colossal mistake.

    Replies: @John Johnson, @Mr. XYZ, @Sean

  820. @Wokechoke
    @Mr. XYZ

    She’s a Bazi or Baltic Nationalist of some kind. Though she also welcomes the negrification of Europe and appears to eagerly await things like Niggers in Paris, but this time Niggers in Riga and Vilnius.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    Where exactly did she say that she awaits blacks in Paris? She opposes miscegenation, after all.

    • Replies: @LatW
    @Mr. XYZ


    Where exactly did she say that she awaits blacks in Paris? She opposes miscegenation, after all.
     
    I never did and never would say anything of the sort. He simply made that up (e.g., lied).

    He has no knowledge (and no empathy) about what it's like for a white woman to walk in downtown in places such as Strasbourg or Brussels (even dressed in normal, non flashy or revealing clothing, in completely normal, supposedly safe parts of the town). And, of course, he has done exactly nothing to alleviate this situation. That's why he has to dream up a myth about Russia as a savior, so he doesn't have to look himself in the eyes and address his shame.

    He can only crap on people like Denis Rex (who would change the situation immediately, if given a chance).

    Replies: @Wokechoke

  821. @Wokechoke
    @Mr. XYZ

    Bari and Bar are overrun with blacks on one side and Montenegrins on the other.

    A better map would show where the Muslims have taken over ports and other coastal cities.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    Croatia literally has virtually no blacks:

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @Mr. XYZ

    Look at France. It will spill over…

    I’ve been to this part of the world a lot. The port cities in the Bari are Blackett black. Then you have Albania.

  822. @Sean
    @Emil Nikola Richard

    Yes, I wondered what the delay with the bear looking and sort of shaking its head before attacking was about, but a commenter explained "the bear had to process his stupidity".

    In the Ukraine too, there was a delay in reacting.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

    The bear did nothing wrong…

  823. @John Johnson
    @Mr. XYZ

    Re: Fertility: The Nazis were total pieces of shit, but if they would have been more generic nationalists (no anti-Semitism or mass murder or forced sterilizations or anti-LGBTQ+ policies), then they would have been much better, especially considering their positive effects on fertility

    Hitler put the country on a positive track and then started a world war.

    They would be the top economy if he stopped at the Munich agreement and then took Hungary/Romania. Or attacked the USSR in 1939 which is what the British conservatives wanted him to do.

    But he always had plans for war. He wrote about Germany needed to take land from the East and he wanted revenge over WW1.

    He at least understood the importance of pro-natal policies while the dwarf of Moscow shrugs as the Slavic population continues to decline. Russia has the world's highest abortion rate and the homicidal dwarf is more concerned with getting his picture next to Peter. Well it ain't happening dwarf, you're a loser Tsar like Nicholas II. There will be no Putin the Great. It will be Putin the War Dunce.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @AP

    Hitler didn’t need to take anything after March 1939. He could have simply kept things as they were indefinitely and also opened Germany’s borders wide open to any foreigner who was deemed sufficiently German and/or Germanizable. Hitler, however, dreamt much bigger than that and wanted to have much more Lebensraum so that Germany could have a much higher carrying capacity for its total population. It wasn’t a bad idea, if one ignores the moral aspects of it as well as the practical difficulties of implementing it. But ultimately it ended up failing and Germany ended up being put in a much worse position than it was right before the start of World War II.

    Hitler wanted Germany to be a second America, only much more brutal. Can’t say that his vision was not grand. But he ultimately ended up going down in history as a massive and epic failure who should have never come to power in Germany in the first place. Big dreams and ambitions sometimes end up dying in rather brutal, harsh, and crushing ways! 🙁

    @Ivashka: The bear wanted to seize human capital that did not rightfully belong to it. A bit like Hitler had he decided to invade the Netherlands in 1939.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
    @Mr. XYZ

    Hitler didn’t need to take anything after March 1939.

    Well technically he never needed to do anything but find a better trade than watercolor painter.

    Hitler, however, dreamt much bigger than that and wanted to have much more Lebensraum so that Germany could have a much higher carrying capacity for its total population.

    Well yes he wrote about that in Mein Kampf. Germany had higher population density than nearby countries and he wanted to spread out.

    Hitler wanted Germany to be a second America, only much more brutal. Can’t say that his vision was not grand

    Yes and that would have happened if he only took a few soft states. Double the population of Germany and slowly expand into Romania and Hungary.

    Or simply attack the USSR first instead of wasting his best men in France and Poland.

    Or take some British colonies. Britain at the time was entirely sick of India.

    He had a thousand ways of doing it and botched his vision through greed and a desire for revenge over WW1.

  824. @Mr. XYZ
    @Anatoly Karlin

    Where specifically has LatW identified with Nazi ideology other than by arguing that Jews are a mixed blessing for the West?


    The RDK are unironic Nazis, homophobes, and misogynists.
     
    Well, Russian nationalists are Nazi-lite (cultural genocide rather than physical genocide of Ukrainians), homophobes, and sometimes misogynists as well (if one considers Putin to be a Russian nationalist):

    https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/576807-putin-directs-sexist-remark-at-us-anchor/

    At least Western aid money and the prospect of EU membership has a chance of making the RDK behave better, no? Didn't Azov moderate a bit over the years once it got infused with less radical new members? They might still have Nazi symbols, but largely for show at this point in time, no?

    The RDK aren't that much different from Russian nationalists, other than them being anti-imperialist, both at home and abroad:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_Volunteer_Corps

    "The RVC says it is made up of ethnic Russians fighting to defend Ukraine against Russia's invasion and to overthrow the government of Vladimir Putin.[1] It asserts Russia's government should abandon its imperial ambitions and instead focus on improving the well-being of ethnic Russians. The RVC say they believe in self-determination for Russia's various ethnic minorities and "want to see a smaller, ethnic Russian state".[4][12][13]"

    No normal person would associate with the scum (the only defensible if cynical form of cooperation with them from an EHC perspective would be to “utilize” them as cannon fodder against stronger regressive forces and lock up any survivors under hate crimes charges when they outlive their usefulness).
     
    First Russia would need to bring back Article 282. Or join the EU, but even then, I don't know if there are general EU hate speech laws that also apply to EU countries that don't have specific hate speech laws of their own. (And EHC rejects hate speech laws or is at least ambivalent towards them.)

    Anyway, I'm not super-eager for the RVC to come to power in Russia, but I still can't help wonder if they could do a better job of governing Russia than Putin would. There is some evidence that authoritarian regimes can be good for countries' birth rates, especially if they are capable of mass mobilizing their population behind particular ideologies (as Putin's regime is clearly incapable of doing):

    https://emilkirkegaard.dk/en/2022/01/authoritarianism-and-fertility-maybe-probably/

    That's not to say that I would be particularly *happy* about Russia remaining an authoritarian state. I just think that if that's going to be Russia's fate in any case, then it should be run by people who are anti-imperialist and who have a chance of being better for Russian TFR relative to the Putin regime.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @LatW

    At least Western aid money and the prospect of EU membership has a chance of making the RDK behave better, no?

    There won’t be a prospect of EU membership. Most likely also no democracy. That was a very, very naive hope.

    But if there was a prospect of reconciliation with Europe, then RDK would compromise for the sake of being in a coalition together with a larger force. In the scenario that they do survive, they will have to compromise even with a larger nationalist force – depending on who comes on top. They will need cover. However, it is likely that the FSB will come on top eventually anyway, in which case it would not be advisable for them to stay in Russia, but to go back to Ukraine instead (unless, as I said, they get a really good cover).

    And, no, they are not misogynist but anti-feminist. And very strongly against non-European immigration, trannyism, against what they call in EE juvenile justice (separation of families for trivial reasons).

    They may come out with a political program at some point, again, if they survive, frankly, right now they don’t have much time for this.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @LatW

    Are you thinking of a coalition government between the RDK and Russian liberals?

    Also, any chance of such a coalition government or at least rogue elements among them deciding to take out the long knives against the FSB at some point in time if they will ever consider the FSB to be a threat? They could set up their own new, better, less brutal version in its place. Similar to how Hitler replaced the SA with the SS, except in that case the SS was much more brutal than the SA ever was.

    I don't like the FSB because it possibly engages in the murder of Putin's critics, including abroad. AFAIK, not even the CCP actually murders its critics abroad.

    When are families separated for trivial reasons in Eastern Europe?

    Replies: @LatW

  825. @John Johnson
    @Mr. XYZ

    Re: Fertility: The Nazis were total pieces of shit, but if they would have been more generic nationalists (no anti-Semitism or mass murder or forced sterilizations or anti-LGBTQ+ policies), then they would have been much better, especially considering their positive effects on fertility

    Hitler put the country on a positive track and then started a world war.

    They would be the top economy if he stopped at the Munich agreement and then took Hungary/Romania. Or attacked the USSR in 1939 which is what the British conservatives wanted him to do.

    But he always had plans for war. He wrote about Germany needed to take land from the East and he wanted revenge over WW1.

    He at least understood the importance of pro-natal policies while the dwarf of Moscow shrugs as the Slavic population continues to decline. Russia has the world's highest abortion rate and the homicidal dwarf is more concerned with getting his picture next to Peter. Well it ain't happening dwarf, you're a loser Tsar like Nicholas II. There will be no Putin the Great. It will be Putin the War Dunce.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @AP

    Well it ain’t happening dwarf, you’re a loser Tsar like Nicholas II.

    He is much worse than Nicholas II. Nicky oversaw population growth, innovation, more improvement and a better country under his rule He just made a colossal mistake.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
    @AP


    Well it ain’t happening dwarf, you’re a loser Tsar like Nicholas II.
     
    He is much worse than Nicholas II. Nicky oversaw population growth, innovation, more improvement and a better country under his rule He just made a colossal mistake.

    He botched the war with Japan, botched WW1 and worst of all let Lenin walk. He could have redeemed himself with a war for existence against the Bolsheviks but mostly chickened out. He didn't even protect his own family from Lenin.

    Population growth was nothing to brag about in the 1900s. That was before the pill and abortion. It's what happens when people have sex and aren't sent to war.

    Nicholas II was the worst but Putin will be in his circle of losers.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    , @Mr. XYZ
    @AP

    Left-wing historians (often those sympathetic to Communism) have sometimes previously argued based on the 1912-1914 series of serious strike waves in Russia that Russia was already on the verge of revolution right before WWI and that WWI and the patriotic sentiment that it generated actually delayed the inevitable Russian Revolution. Do you think that they are simply huffing hot air and blowing smoke out of their asses?

    I do agree with you on the grand scheme of things, though. Russia had a much better future under Nicholas II than it has under Putin. Even the war against Japan did not seriously destroy Russia's future. For that matter, neither would WWI had Russia not descended into revolution in the middle of it, which was likely made more likely by the Tsarina Alexandra and Rasputin playing musical chairs with the ministers in the Tsar's Cabinet in the Tsar's absence (he was at the front). Had Russia avoided descending into revolution during WWI and the US would have still entered the war (harder to do with Nicholas remaining in power since the US wouldn't have been able to portray it as a democracies vs. autocracy struggle, but still theoretically possible due to USW and the Zimmerman Telegram), then Russia would have lost a couple million lives as a result of WWI but would have still had an extraordinarily bright future.

    There's a saying that history begins as a tragedy and ends as a farce. That's essentially Russia between 1917 and the present-day. First the tragedy of Communism and then the farcical Russian attempt to conquer Ukraine for its human capital due to Communism and Nazism destroying most of Russia's 20th century demographic potential and Russians being unwilling to adopt a pro-natalist culture like Israeli Jews (who also have many people who and whose ancestors have severely suffered during the 20th century) have done.

    The end result of this all is that Russia's dreams of being its own separate civilizational pole are destroyed and that to top it all off, Russo-Ukrainian relations will be destroyed for decades. Gorbachev might have destroyed the USSR, but at least Russians and Ukrainians still considered each other brothers afterwards. Not anymore. Not by a long shot. Very sad but it is what it is.

    , @Sean
    @AP


    Nicky oversaw population growth
     
    Not difficult when Ukraine was part of ones realm.With its fertile land, Ukraine had been over populated for a very long time, but the Tsarist regime failed in getting people to go and settle underpopulated Siberia. Selling the wheat would have provided capital to industrialise and import technology, but rural overpopulation in the Ukraine especially was eating up the surplus. Hence, the Holodomor. The soundness of the Soviet solution for rural overpopulation was recognised by young economists of Nazi Germany who were planning on the exploitation of the East.

    As the Germans saw it, the Jewish problem in Galicia was also one of overpopulation; Jews having outgrown their historical niche and being so extremely numerous they were monopolizing small cottage industry type business and trading right down to door to door peddling from a suitcase, thereby blocking the Poles from ever developing a middle class.

  826. @LatW
    @Ivashka the fool


    Re: Smart cities, digital currency, etc.
     
    Sure, these things are being laid out in these policy documents but I was actually wondering about it from the other side, not the side of how network states would be built (the EHC would easily figure out these practical details), I was wondering more about how the EHC who will be inclined to leave the nation-state (or the multi-culti state), how they would extricate themselves from that state - usually such things happen either through some kind of a consensus or through violent means. Obligations to the state (taxes owed, military service, all kinds of other administrative obligations) follow one where ever one goes in the world. I guess I'm just wondering about that moment when the EHC decide to bail, how exactly they will tell their original state to take a hike?

    There is some old school American right wing anarchist and libertarian literature out there on these topics (from the 1990s), but it's always been viewed as "utopian".

    Oh, and, btw, I wouldn't put too much weight on the UN these days. Many of these large, old school orgs didn't show themselves in a very flattering light during the dramatic events and humanitarian crises that have just transpired. So I wouldn't expect them to be all that capable in carrying out their countless plans. Smart cities, etc., will mostly be done by private individuals, in collaboration with the local governments, not these UN type orgs.

    Btw, thanks for the giraffe heart video - very instructive. Not always easy to live by that in our dynamic age. I guess we should've all followed that after 1991.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

    You misunderstood me.

    What I was referring to, was that once these policies implemented, there will be no way to not pay one’s dues. It’ll be taken at the source when the CBDC will be emitted through smart contract into one’s account. So it won’t matter where one pays one’s taxes, the Central Banks will settle all the accounts just fine. It’ll be all digital, strings of 111s and 000s emitted (and resorbed) at will by the TPTB.

    Given that it’ll be directly attached to one’s virtual identification, It’ll be impossible to hide how much one is worth. And if one misbehaves, then one will be stripped of one’s belongings. That makes a rebellion against the system impossible for anyone who is identified. That’s why I wrote above that it is of vital importance for anyone who wants to develop independent network organizations, to get to be able to change one’s digital identification at will. Otherwise, any autonomy is impossible.

    If they wouldn’t be capable of being anonymous/switching identifications, then they won’t be able to build these networks. It would be just a pipe dream, another LARP.

    Btw, thanks for the giraffe heart video – very instructive.

    I posted it as a joke, but if you want something seriously useful as a tool to achieve pacification of the negative aspects of our mind, look no further, here it is:

    Safe with most medications!

    😇

    • Replies: @LatW
    @Ivashka the fool


    What I was referring to, was that once these policies implemented, there will be no way to not pay one’s dues. It’ll be taken at the source when the CBDC will be emitted through smart contract into one’s account. So it won’t matter where one pays one’s taxes, the Central Banks will settle all the accounts just fine. It’ll be all digital, strings of 111s and 000s emitted (and resorbed) at will by the TPTB.
     
    Right. But this could actually be a part of a wider conversation about what can be considered of value in our lives. Anything pertaining to the personal liberties and property of Europeans (and of course Americans) is a very sensitive question and needs to be discussed openly.

    Btw, from what I understood, the private banks in some cases aren't even all that happy with this idea of CBDC by central banks, it is very much about regulation and may even curtail some of the operations of private banks.

    That makes a rebellion against the system impossible for anyone who is identified.
     
    This isn't as easy in a healthy society where there is group loyalty. But many will probably be ok with such a system, as long as they get their daily needs met.


    I posted it as a joke, but if you want something seriously useful as a tool to achieve pacification of the negative aspects of our mind, look no further
     
    Thanks for sharing that, it is very beautiful. I already have something similar in my own Tradition (called the Place of Tranquility), it's just a matter of turning one's mind to it, arranging space and time for it.
  827. @Ivashka the fool
    @LatW

    You misunderstood me.

    What I was referring to, was that once these policies implemented, there will be no way to not pay one's dues. It'll be taken at the source when the CBDC will be emitted through smart contract into one's account. So it won't matter where one pays one's taxes, the Central Banks will settle all the accounts just fine. It'll be all digital, strings of 111s and 000s emitted (and resorbed) at will by the TPTB.

    Given that it'll be directly attached to one's virtual identification, It'll be impossible to hide how much one is worth. And if one misbehaves, then one will be stripped of one's belongings. That makes a rebellion against the system impossible for anyone who is identified. That's why I wrote above that it is of vital importance for anyone who wants to develop independent network organizations, to get to be able to change one's digital identification at will. Otherwise, any autonomy is impossible.

    If they wouldn't be capable of being anonymous/switching identifications, then they won't be able to build these networks. It would be just a pipe dream, another LARP.


    Btw, thanks for the giraffe heart video – very instructive.
     
    I posted it as a joke, but if you want something seriously useful as a tool to achieve pacification of the negative aspects of our mind, look no further, here it is:

    https://youtu.be/lk2eKqhVouU

    Safe with most medications!

    😇

    Replies: @LatW

    What I was referring to, was that once these policies implemented, there will be no way to not pay one’s dues. It’ll be taken at the source when the CBDC will be emitted through smart contract into one’s account. So it won’t matter where one pays one’s taxes, the Central Banks will settle all the accounts just fine. It’ll be all digital, strings of 111s and 000s emitted (and resorbed) at will by the TPTB.

    Right. But this could actually be a part of a wider conversation about what can be considered of value in our lives. Anything pertaining to the personal liberties and property of Europeans (and of course Americans) is a very sensitive question and needs to be discussed openly.

    Btw, from what I understood, the private banks in some cases aren’t even all that happy with this idea of CBDC by central banks, it is very much about regulation and may even curtail some of the operations of private banks.

    That makes a rebellion against the system impossible for anyone who is identified.

    This isn’t as easy in a healthy society where there is group loyalty. But many will probably be ok with such a system, as long as they get their daily needs met.

    [MORE]

    I posted it as a joke, but if you want something seriously useful as a tool to achieve pacification of the negative aspects of our mind, look no further

    Thanks for sharing that, it is very beautiful. I already have something similar in my own Tradition (called the Place of Tranquility), it’s just a matter of turning one’s mind to it, arranging space and time for it.

  828. @Mr. XYZ
    @John Johnson

    Hitler didn't need to take anything after March 1939. He could have simply kept things as they were indefinitely and also opened Germany's borders wide open to any foreigner who was deemed sufficiently German and/or Germanizable. Hitler, however, dreamt much bigger than that and wanted to have much more Lebensraum so that Germany could have a much higher carrying capacity for its total population. It wasn't a bad idea, if one ignores the moral aspects of it as well as the practical difficulties of implementing it. But ultimately it ended up failing and Germany ended up being put in a much worse position than it was right before the start of World War II.

    Hitler wanted Germany to be a second America, only much more brutal. Can't say that his vision was not grand. But he ultimately ended up going down in history as a massive and epic failure who should have never come to power in Germany in the first place. Big dreams and ambitions sometimes end up dying in rather brutal, harsh, and crushing ways! :(

    @Ivashka: The bear wanted to seize human capital that did not rightfully belong to it. A bit like Hitler had he decided to invade the Netherlands in 1939.

    Replies: @John Johnson

    Hitler didn’t need to take anything after March 1939.

    Well technically he never needed to do anything but find a better trade than watercolor painter.

    Hitler, however, dreamt much bigger than that and wanted to have much more Lebensraum so that Germany could have a much higher carrying capacity for its total population.

    Well yes he wrote about that in Mein Kampf. Germany had higher population density than nearby countries and he wanted to spread out.

    Hitler wanted Germany to be a second America, only much more brutal. Can’t say that his vision was not grand

    Yes and that would have happened if he only took a few soft states. Double the population of Germany and slowly expand into Romania and Hungary.

    Or simply attack the USSR first instead of wasting his best men in France and Poland.

    Or take some British colonies. Britain at the time was entirely sick of India.

    He had a thousand ways of doing it and botched his vision through greed and a desire for revenge over WW1.

  829. @AP
    @John Johnson


    Well it ain’t happening dwarf, you’re a loser Tsar like Nicholas II.
     
    He is much worse than Nicholas II. Nicky oversaw population growth, innovation, more improvement and a better country under his rule He just made a colossal mistake.

    Replies: @John Johnson, @Mr. XYZ, @Sean

    Well it ain’t happening dwarf, you’re a loser Tsar like Nicholas II.

    He is much worse than Nicholas II. Nicky oversaw population growth, innovation, more improvement and a better country under his rule He just made a colossal mistake.

    He botched the war with Japan, botched WW1 and worst of all let Lenin walk. He could have redeemed himself with a war for existence against the Bolsheviks but mostly chickened out. He didn’t even protect his own family from Lenin.

    Population growth was nothing to brag about in the 1900s. That was before the pill and abortion. It’s what happens when people have sex and aren’t sent to war.

    Nicholas II was the worst but Putin will be in his circle of losers.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @John Johnson

    Not killing Lenin and Trotsky and Stalin was definitely a mistake. Those three should have definitely been killed, especially Lenin. Though I don't know if this was actually clear without the benefit of hindsight. (Makes one wonder if Nicky II's inaction on this front was an inspiration for Putin to likely be much more active on this front, unfortunately?)

    Russia was not losing WWI when Nicky got overthrown. However, the war would have likely turned against the Allies had the US not entered WWI in 1917 due to the unsecured loans that the US provided to the Allies. Britain was in a very dire financial situation by 1917 before the US's unsecured loans starting coming in. Adam Tooze's book The Deluge covers this topic in extensive detail.

    Replies: @Wokechoke

  830. @John Johnson
    @LatW

    As to the Russian freedom fighter groups, they are still in the minority – most Russians do not support their goals. The support is currently increasing, but they also have to share the nationalist niche with the likes of Prigo.

    Yes Putin has more support with the masses and they also have a completely controlled state media that tells them how to think. Journalists that question the war end up in prison.

    The freedom fighters would have majority support if Putin was forced to answer questions in an unscripted interview on how exactly is the war is in their best interest. Even in scripted interviews he messes up and can't explain himself or keep a consistent justification. He is basically a scared little boy that is terrified of journalists asking questions and revealing the mediocre KGB paper pusher that pretends to be a confident leader.

    Replies: @Mikel

    they also have a completely controlled state media that tells them how to think. Journalists that question the war end up in prison.

    I wonder where people like you (or your splitting images, the Western Putin fans like Anglin and McGregor) come from. Have you ever watched any popular Russian TV debate show subtitled in English, like Soloviov’s? Just once? Do you know who Russian war correspondents Rybar and Wargonzo are and how their reporting is regularly used by Western pro-Ukrainian sources to provide objective information on the course of the war?

    Heck, are you even capable of processing the fact that right here we have just been visited by a notorious Moscow blogger who is publicly comparing Putin to a chimpanzee every day and actually promoting treason?

    With all the things one can criticize Putin and his regime for, why invent equivocal ones? And when one is engaged in such inventions, why choose the one that actually applies to the Ukrainians much more than to the Russians? Even on this blog we have the revealing fact that not one single ethnic Ukrainian, as far as I know, found it fit to criticize the Ukrainian government when it was killing its own civilians but we do have a number of Russians who criticized their government from the start of the war.

    Besides, Zelensky has just received Greta Thunberg’s visit in Kiev and that’s just too much, even for a lifelong pacifist like me. F*ck Kiev and all it stands for today.

    • Replies: @Wielgus
    @Mikel

    They don't tolerate dissent in Kiev, that's for sure. And the way one of their negotiators was summarily killed last year had just a touch of the Night of the Long Knives about it. Shot while trying to escape, or something like that.

    , @sudden death
    @Mikel

    Allowed active public war criticism/reporting in RF media is about that how RF forces are bad at killing Ukrainians efficiently, those who are against invasions in and killings of neighbouring people in principle, no matter how succesfully it could be done, are thrown in jail with multiple years sentences.

    There is plenty of intra-UA war efficiency criticism of such type going in Kiev too, you're either not following it or unfamiliar with them (eg. Yuri Kasjanov, Yuri Biriukov, Yuri Butusov et al), all of them are very critical Zelensky or regarding everyday military inner UA matters and problems.

    Replies: @sudden death, @Mikel

    , @John Johnson
    @Mikel


    they also have a completely controlled state media that tells them how to think. Journalists that question the war end up in prison.
     
    I wonder where people like you (or your splitting images, the Western Putin fans like Anglin and McGregor) come from.

    How would I be a splitting image for pointing out that Russia locks away journalists for criticizing the war? Is that something you deny? It is well documented by human rights organizations.

    Russian journalist gets 6 years in penal colony for speaking out on Ukraine
    https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/2/15/russian-journalist-sentenced-to-penal-colony-in-dissent-crackdown

    Note that the Russian penal colonies are managed by the mob (thieves in law) and tolerate male rape. Can provide sources on that if you would like.

    Have you ever watched any popular Russian TV debate show subtitled in English, like Soloviov’s? Just once?

    Yes I have watched Putin's Jewish propagandist many times. I would describe his show as a dystopian nightmare. A totalitarian version of Fox 'n Friends.

    Here he is calling for attacks on London:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nV5yIvqDaKI

    Note that he has a draft dodging male model son in London.
    https://www.newsweek.com/fact-check-putin-allys-son-dodging-draft-modelling-london-1781618

    He also did a show where he told Russian men to go die for their country.

    What is your point exactly? Did you have a question for me?

    Replies: @Mikel

  831. From daily news:

    Earth tilting due to our water use

    Groundwater extraction to provide communities with drinking water and irrigation has pulled so much moisture out of the earth, it’s tilting the planet’s axis. The Earth’s axis shifted about 31 inches to the east over the course of about two decades — roughly 1.7 inches a year — because of our need for groundwater, according to new research. While people do not feel the Earth rotating, shifts to its rotational axis could cause further changes to the climate and impact GPS systems for cell phones, weapons and planes.

  832. @AP
    @John Johnson


    Well it ain’t happening dwarf, you’re a loser Tsar like Nicholas II.
     
    He is much worse than Nicholas II. Nicky oversaw population growth, innovation, more improvement and a better country under his rule He just made a colossal mistake.

    Replies: @John Johnson, @Mr. XYZ, @Sean

    Left-wing historians (often those sympathetic to Communism) have sometimes previously argued based on the 1912-1914 series of serious strike waves in Russia that Russia was already on the verge of revolution right before WWI and that WWI and the patriotic sentiment that it generated actually delayed the inevitable Russian Revolution. Do you think that they are simply huffing hot air and blowing smoke out of their asses?

    I do agree with you on the grand scheme of things, though. Russia had a much better future under Nicholas II than it has under Putin. Even the war against Japan did not seriously destroy Russia’s future. For that matter, neither would WWI had Russia not descended into revolution in the middle of it, which was likely made more likely by the Tsarina Alexandra and Rasputin playing musical chairs with the ministers in the Tsar’s Cabinet in the Tsar’s absence (he was at the front). Had Russia avoided descending into revolution during WWI and the US would have still entered the war (harder to do with Nicholas remaining in power since the US wouldn’t have been able to portray it as a democracies vs. autocracy struggle, but still theoretically possible due to USW and the Zimmerman Telegram), then Russia would have lost a couple million lives as a result of WWI but would have still had an extraordinarily bright future.

    There’s a saying that history begins as a tragedy and ends as a farce. That’s essentially Russia between 1917 and the present-day. First the tragedy of Communism and then the farcical Russian attempt to conquer Ukraine for its human capital due to Communism and Nazism destroying most of Russia’s 20th century demographic potential and Russians being unwilling to adopt a pro-natalist culture like Israeli Jews (who also have many people who and whose ancestors have severely suffered during the 20th century) have done.

    The end result of this all is that Russia’s dreams of being its own separate civilizational pole are destroyed and that to top it all off, Russo-Ukrainian relations will be destroyed for decades. Gorbachev might have destroyed the USSR, but at least Russians and Ukrainians still considered each other brothers afterwards. Not anymore. Not by a long shot. Very sad but it is what it is.

  833. @LatW
    @Mr. XYZ


    At least Western aid money and the prospect of EU membership has a chance of making the RDK behave better, no?
     
    There won't be a prospect of EU membership. Most likely also no democracy. That was a very, very naive hope.

    But if there was a prospect of reconciliation with Europe, then RDK would compromise for the sake of being in a coalition together with a larger force. In the scenario that they do survive, they will have to compromise even with a larger nationalist force - depending on who comes on top. They will need cover. However, it is likely that the FSB will come on top eventually anyway, in which case it would not be advisable for them to stay in Russia, but to go back to Ukraine instead (unless, as I said, they get a really good cover).

    And, no, they are not misogynist but anti-feminist. And very strongly against non-European immigration, trannyism, against what they call in EE juvenile justice (separation of families for trivial reasons).

    They may come out with a political program at some point, again, if they survive, frankly, right now they don't have much time for this.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    Are you thinking of a coalition government between the RDK and Russian liberals?

    Also, any chance of such a coalition government or at least rogue elements among them deciding to take out the long knives against the FSB at some point in time if they will ever consider the FSB to be a threat? They could set up their own new, better, less brutal version in its place. Similar to how Hitler replaced the SA with the SS, except in that case the SS was much more brutal than the SA ever was.

    I don’t like the FSB because it possibly engages in the murder of Putin’s critics, including abroad. AFAIK, not even the CCP actually murders its critics abroad.

    When are families separated for trivial reasons in Eastern Europe?

    • Replies: @LatW
    @Mr. XYZ


    Are you thinking of a coalition government between the RDK and Russian liberals?
     
    It's not going to happen in the foreseeable future. But under normal EE parliamentarianism, this could happen - they could carve out a niche within a wider, liber or maybe even national democratic coalition. This happened elsewhere. It is not ideal from the real nationalist perspective, but it is something. It is not fully clear what is better - to act within a coalition and be in power, or act autonomously, in a more radical manner, but without political power.

    Also, any chance of such a coalition government or at least rogue elements among them deciding to take out the long knives against the FSB at some point in time if they will ever consider the FSB to be a threat? They could set up their own new, better, less brutal version in its place.
     
    Very low chance to have a functioning parliamentary system at all. The RDK don't have the power or the means to face the FSB, of course, but they could collude with Prigo (not fully but kind of in parallel, on the go). But it is possible that Prigo himself has FSB behind him. There could be some new "iron fist" government, they could either be integrated in that system or they would be killed (or go back to Ukraine). But for them to promote their ethnonationalist ideals, they do not have enough manpower right now. Neither does the Legion (the Legion is more democratic and egalitarian / inclusive). They would need tens of thousands of men to make a difference. I doubt they will be allowed to. But Caesar, the commander of the Legion, said that even a few thousand can make a change. It's a crazy situation. I'm sure most of the resources are controlled by the FSB.

    Similar to how Hitler replaced the SA with the SS, except in that case the SS was much more brutal than the SA ever was.

     

    They are nowhere near in the position where Hitler was at that time. And, frankly, their profile is more similar to that of SA anyway (although they are really just volunteers with very little protection, so not as formidable as SA), they would have to grow a lot to the level of SS. Even Wagner is (was) not at that level.

    I don’t like the FSB because it possibly engages in the murder of Putin’s critics, including abroad.

     

    Wagner is connected to FSB (actually came out of GRU), and they are extremely cruel, mostly towards their own (all the brutal stories have not even made it out in the open). Although there are somewhat "normal" guys there, too. Don't dream about any democracy and humanity, it won't be coming any time soon. Do you understand Russian (or maybe Russian is your first language)?

    When are families separated for trivial reasons in Eastern Europe?
     
    Modern Northern Germanic family laws are seeping into the EE, and in some cases they are at odds with EE family traditions. In most cases, they are well intended (to protect women and children from violence), but when taken too far and when bureaucratized too much, they have negative side effects and separate families needlessly (or place unnecessary burdens on them at a vulnerable time). This is something that the Ukrainian immigrants and refugees in Western Europe should look out for. But from what I understood from Denis Rex, this was apparently a problem in Russia in some cases (because Russia is also modernizing quite quickly). It's a very complicated issue where legal, bureaucratic and cultural aspects collide (women's rights, best interests of children as well as traditional family norms all need to be weighed out here - it's an ideological confrontation between Nordic and traditional EE/Slavic values which requires very close scrutiny and a balanced approach, of course, safety of children is non-negotiable).
  834. @John Johnson
    @AP


    Well it ain’t happening dwarf, you’re a loser Tsar like Nicholas II.
     
    He is much worse than Nicholas II. Nicky oversaw population growth, innovation, more improvement and a better country under his rule He just made a colossal mistake.

    He botched the war with Japan, botched WW1 and worst of all let Lenin walk. He could have redeemed himself with a war for existence against the Bolsheviks but mostly chickened out. He didn't even protect his own family from Lenin.

    Population growth was nothing to brag about in the 1900s. That was before the pill and abortion. It's what happens when people have sex and aren't sent to war.

    Nicholas II was the worst but Putin will be in his circle of losers.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    Not killing Lenin and Trotsky and Stalin was definitely a mistake. Those three should have definitely been killed, especially Lenin. Though I don’t know if this was actually clear without the benefit of hindsight. (Makes one wonder if Nicky II’s inaction on this front was an inspiration for Putin to likely be much more active on this front, unfortunately?)

    Russia was not losing WWI when Nicky got overthrown. However, the war would have likely turned against the Allies had the US not entered WWI in 1917 due to the unsecured loans that the US provided to the Allies. Britain was in a very dire financial situation by 1917 before the US’s unsecured loans starting coming in. Adam Tooze’s book The Deluge covers this topic in extensive detail.

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @Mr. XYZ

    The issue with Britain in ww1 is that they didn’t have to resort to emergency measures and radically change the economy to rationing and a command economy or nationalisation. Capitalism in the UK was in serious trouble, it never ended though, but fighting could go on for years and years under a command economy if it came to that. What the US did was to save the system before having to resort to that extreme.

    In ww2 the British nationalised almost everything and resorted to rationing. Which did collapse the previous system. A much more serious crisis.

  835. @Mr. XYZ
    @LatW

    Are you thinking of a coalition government between the RDK and Russian liberals?

    Also, any chance of such a coalition government or at least rogue elements among them deciding to take out the long knives against the FSB at some point in time if they will ever consider the FSB to be a threat? They could set up their own new, better, less brutal version in its place. Similar to how Hitler replaced the SA with the SS, except in that case the SS was much more brutal than the SA ever was.

    I don't like the FSB because it possibly engages in the murder of Putin's critics, including abroad. AFAIK, not even the CCP actually murders its critics abroad.

    When are families separated for trivial reasons in Eastern Europe?

    Replies: @LatW

    Are you thinking of a coalition government between the RDK and Russian liberals?

    It’s not going to happen in the foreseeable future. But under normal EE parliamentarianism, this could happen – they could carve out a niche within a wider, liber or maybe even national democratic coalition. This happened elsewhere. It is not ideal from the real nationalist perspective, but it is something. It is not fully clear what is better – to act within a coalition and be in power, or act autonomously, in a more radical manner, but without political power.

    Also, any chance of such a coalition government or at least rogue elements among them deciding to take out the long knives against the FSB at some point in time if they will ever consider the FSB to be a threat? They could set up their own new, better, less brutal version in its place.

    Very low chance to have a functioning parliamentary system at all. The RDK don’t have the power or the means to face the FSB, of course, but they could collude with Prigo (not fully but kind of in parallel, on the go). But it is possible that Prigo himself has FSB behind him. There could be some new “iron fist” government, they could either be integrated in that system or they would be killed (or go back to Ukraine). But for them to promote their ethnonationalist ideals, they do not have enough manpower right now. Neither does the Legion (the Legion is more democratic and egalitarian / inclusive). They would need tens of thousands of men to make a difference. I doubt they will be allowed to. But Caesar, the commander of the Legion, said that even a few thousand can make a change. It’s a crazy situation. I’m sure most of the resources are controlled by the FSB.

    Similar to how Hitler replaced the SA with the SS, except in that case the SS was much more brutal than the SA ever was.

    They are nowhere near in the position where Hitler was at that time. And, frankly, their profile is more similar to that of SA anyway (although they are really just volunteers with very little protection, so not as formidable as SA), they would have to grow a lot to the level of SS. Even Wagner is (was) not at that level.

    [MORE]

    I don’t like the FSB because it possibly engages in the murder of Putin’s critics, including abroad.

    Wagner is connected to FSB (actually came out of GRU), and they are extremely cruel, mostly towards their own (all the brutal stories have not even made it out in the open). Although there are somewhat “normal” guys there, too. Don’t dream about any democracy and humanity, it won’t be coming any time soon. Do you understand Russian (or maybe Russian is your first language)?

    When are families separated for trivial reasons in Eastern Europe?

    Modern Northern Germanic family laws are seeping into the EE, and in some cases they are at odds with EE family traditions. In most cases, they are well intended (to protect women and children from violence), but when taken too far and when bureaucratized too much, they have negative side effects and separate families needlessly (or place unnecessary burdens on them at a vulnerable time). This is something that the Ukrainian immigrants and refugees in Western Europe should look out for. But from what I understood from Denis Rex, this was apparently a problem in Russia in some cases (because Russia is also modernizing quite quickly). It’s a very complicated issue where legal, bureaucratic and cultural aspects collide (women’s rights, best interests of children as well as traditional family norms all need to be weighed out here – it’s an ideological confrontation between Nordic and traditional EE/Slavic values which requires very close scrutiny and a balanced approach, of course, safety of children is non-negotiable).

  836. @Mr. XYZ
    @Wokechoke

    Where exactly did she say that she awaits blacks in Paris? She opposes miscegenation, after all.

    Replies: @LatW

    Where exactly did she say that she awaits blacks in Paris? She opposes miscegenation, after all.

    I never did and never would say anything of the sort. He simply made that up (e.g., lied).

    He has no knowledge (and no empathy) about what it’s like for a white woman to walk in downtown in places such as Strasbourg or Brussels (even dressed in normal, non flashy or revealing clothing, in completely normal, supposedly safe parts of the town). And, of course, he has done exactly nothing to alleviate this situation. That’s why he has to dream up a myth about Russia as a savior, so he doesn’t have to look himself in the eyes and address his shame.

    He can only crap on people like Denis Rex (who would change the situation immediately, if given a chance).

    • Agree: Ivashka the fool
    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @LatW

    You stated that you wouldn’t mind the erasure of a white Europe as long as the darkies who inherited it would keep speaking Latvian in your particular corner of Europe. Just economics you said.

    Replies: @LatW

  837. Re Anatoly: he’s a guy I’ve always really liked and respected so I am cautiously that when the scam that is crypto and the hype job that is AI have both faded away that he will return to reality

    Re the internal political situation in Russia: The best sources are Strelkov and Rolo Slavisky. Anatoly has described Rolo as “the most brilliant man to ever live”, and while I wouldn’t go that far, he is an autistic guy who has devoted his entire life to sperging about Kremlin intrigue, so he is likely the most reliable source available to us non Russian speakers.

    Rolo says that the Putin regime is in trouble, that Prigohzin remains a viable threat. To back up this point he cites 3 pieces of evidence: 1. Prigohzin has openly formed an alliance with Lukashenko 2. Prigohzin is, amazingly, still in Russia, apparently in St Petersburg; and Putin isn’t going after him after Prig killed over 30 Russian airmen 3. The regime/military/public all completely failing to rally to Putin’s defense during the coup

    To this you can add that the Kremlin has arrested Surovikin while pretending that they haven’t.

    Me personally, my money is on Putin to come out on a top of all this and stronger on the other side. I agree that the Putin regime is brittle, but I also think that it is fairly stable.

    The situation at the front: here is where things get really murky. The Ukrainians are pushing back the Russians everywhere, and they are actually doing so at a decent pace. The Ukrainian/NATO strategy seems to be to pressure Russia on a broad front while using cruise missiles to damage Russian logistics. The idea being that eventually the Russian lines will buckle like they did during the Kherson offensive.

    I’m far from convinced that this is going to work. Russia was attempting to hold a severely undermanned front in Kherson whereas now they have sufficient personnel. OTOH, the Ukrainian army is much stronger than the one that existed last fall. It appears that, currently, casualties during the offensive have been even and the exchange ratio may be beginning to favor the Ukrainian side again. But the Ukrainian casualties are mostly being suffered by Ukraine’s best offensive troops, whereas Russian casualties are likely to be much more replaceable.

    There are huge questions about the size of the Russian reserves and Russia’s ability to replace losses in the short term. Strelkov says that there are no meaningful reserves whereas Rolo says that it isn’t clear. My guess, and I could easily be mistaken, is that Russia does in fact have enough reserves to continue to hold the line for the next several months, after which I expect the Ukrainian offensive to peter out. But I don’t believe that Russia will proceed to launch a counter offensive.

    One other thing: while Russia does have some ability to replace losses of equipment with domestic production, I am convinced that Russia is getting massive resupply not just from Iran, but from China and North Korea (through Iran) as well. This, as opposed to rank incompetence, is what explains the seemingly nonchalant attitude of Russia towards scaling up domestic production.

  838. @Mikel
    @John Johnson


    they also have a completely controlled state media that tells them how to think. Journalists that question the war end up in prison.
     
    I wonder where people like you (or your splitting images, the Western Putin fans like Anglin and McGregor) come from. Have you ever watched any popular Russian TV debate show subtitled in English, like Soloviov's? Just once? Do you know who Russian war correspondents Rybar and Wargonzo are and how their reporting is regularly used by Western pro-Ukrainian sources to provide objective information on the course of the war?

    Heck, are you even capable of processing the fact that right here we have just been visited by a notorious Moscow blogger who is publicly comparing Putin to a chimpanzee every day and actually promoting treason?

    With all the things one can criticize Putin and his regime for, why invent equivocal ones? And when one is engaged in such inventions, why choose the one that actually applies to the Ukrainians much more than to the Russians? Even on this blog we have the revealing fact that not one single ethnic Ukrainian, as far as I know, found it fit to criticize the Ukrainian government when it was killing its own civilians but we do have a number of Russians who criticized their government from the start of the war.

    Besides, Zelensky has just received Greta Thunberg's visit in Kiev and that's just too much, even for a lifelong pacifist like me. F*ck Kiev and all it stands for today.

    Replies: @Wielgus, @sudden death, @John Johnson

    They don’t tolerate dissent in Kiev, that’s for sure. And the way one of their negotiators was summarily killed last year had just a touch of the Night of the Long Knives about it. Shot while trying to escape, or something like that.

    • Agree: Mikhail
  839. Putin is not nearly as bad as Nicholas II so far. But if people even begin this discussion, it’s a symptom of his loss of image even in this forum.

    For example, this invasion of Ukraine by Putin could be already as bad as the Nikolai’s war with Japan, obviously it’s not as bad as the First World War which has resulted with killing of around 2 million Russian soldiers.

    • Replies: @AP
    @Dmitry


    Putin is not nearly as bad as Nicholas II so far.
     
    Putin is not nearly as good as Nicholas II, until Nicholas’s colossal mistake of getting into World War I. Under Nicholas Russia experienced it’s silver age of culture, Stolypin’s reforms brought prosperity to much of the countryside, Russia rapidly industrialized and entered the ranks of the most industrialized powers. Nicholas’s Russia performed poorly against Japan in 1905 but by 1914 it had improved sufficiently that it had defeated both Austria-Hungary and the Ottoman Empire, while holding on vs. Germany. Compare to Putin’s Russia which is stalemating and slowly losing its grip over Ukraine.

    No ruler of Russia after Nicholas has been better than Nicholas. Lenin and Stalin killed millions of Russians in peacetime (even more than were lost during World War I), and Stalin’s mistakes versus little Germany cost tens of millions more (those two criminals squandered Russia’s meteoric rise), Khrushchev and Brezhnev and oversaw modest improvement followed by stagnation, Gorbachev and Yeltsin oversaw collapse, Putin showed decent recovery but has thrown it all away.

    For example, this invasion of Ukraine by Putin could be already as bad as the Nikolai’s war with Japan
     
    It’s worse. Not only is Putin’s war against a much smaller and weaker country, but the Russian Empire lost 43,000-70,000 dead total due to KIA, fatal wounds and disease against Japan. Despite the existence of modern medicine, Russia has managed to lose more dead versus Ukraine (full number is unknown but it was around 30,000 in December before Bakhmut and the newest offensive, so must be at least 80,000 and probably over 100,000 by now).

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

  840. @Another Polish Perspective
    @Dmitry


    If you read the books of a historian who is famous in Russia (Boris Mironov), in traditional Russian village even in 19th century they couldn’t impose Christian rules about sexuality, against more liberal traditional views.
     
    Yeah, when I researched cousin marriages around the world, I met this phenomenon, a kind of polygamy actually... fathers living with sons' wives. No wonder it could later produce some unintentional cousin marriages.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snokhachestvo

    As for the Orthodox Church, I read once a novel (Russian but in German translation) which was taking place in a village belonging to a monastery, and almost every monk had his lover in this village... And everyone around took it for granted, as almost natural...

    I suppose such attitudes could be bred in Russia due to isolation of such communities, and in this sense, insularity seems to free the more animalistic side of human.

    Replies: @Dmitry

    A difference for Russian peasants compared to some other cultures, it wasn’t important if the woman was virgin before marriage i.e. there was a more sexual liberal attitude in the Russian villages compared to some other areas of the world.

    They also don’t live in the nuclear family and there were those famous customs like father-in-law sleeping with the childs/daughter-in-law.

    Although this isn’t a natural situation, for serfs a larger part of the population are living in an intermediate situation kind of less extreme part of a spectrum towards situations like African Americans in slavery.

    By second half of the 19th century, there were modern Western nuclear family in the urban middle class and aristocracy. By later 19th century, for upper class there was lowered levels of male authority and large popularity of modern trends like feminism for the educated women.

    This is part of the result of being developing country which is culture importer. A part of the country can be living like medieval times, another part can be followers of the most advanced fashions and culture, like they cultural vanguard.

  841. @Mr. XYZ
    Re: Fertility: The Nazis were total pieces of shit, but if they would have been more generic nationalists (no anti-Semitism or mass murder or forced sterilizations or anti-LGBTQ+ policies), then they would have been much better, especially considering their positive effects on fertility:

    German TFR:

    1932: 1.70
    1933: 1.67
    1934: 2.07
    1935: 2.20
    1936: 2.25
    1937: 2.28
    1938: 2.45
    1939: 2.59
    1940: 2.59

    In 1940, Nazi Germany was quite arguably at its peak. A TFR increase of 0.89 children in just eight years!

    Austrian TFR:

    1938: 1.92
    1939: 2.86
    1940: 2.70

    The Nazi German annexation of Austria achieved the same effect in record time!

    Any Russian leader who is capable of achieving such progress--say, move Russia's TFR from 1.7 to 2.5 (it's now 1.2 but it was 1.7 a decade ago, I think)--would be quite admirable so long as they do not engage in significant human rights abuses. This would benefit the right in the sense that Russia would get even more EU parliamentary representation if Russia were to ever subsequently join the EU.

    Replies: @John Johnson, @Dmitry

    This date is not accurate. If you look at complete fertility rates, it was below replacement rate in the Nazi Germany years.

    Some your other texts are inaccurate as well. You seem to think fertility rate is easily changed. You are writing strange comments about the motives for the invasion with Ukraine, you also still continue to write about “economies of scale” after I already explained to you this is incorrect.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @Dmitry

    Do you have a source for the first part, please?

    Fertility rate is not *easily* changed but it can theoretically be done. For instance, ex-USSR Jews after moving to Israel.

    I'm arguing against Anatoly Karlin's arguments in favor of Russia attacking Ukraine. Though maybe the kremlins have never considered such arguments. Not sure.

    As for economies of scale, here you go:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economies_of_scale

    Replies: @Dmitry

  842. @Emil Nikola Richard
    @Mikhail

    Enemy of my enemy is my friend fallacy.

    In this book:

    https://www.amazon.com/Interview-Wizard-Peter-J-Carroll/dp/1914153146/

    Peter Carroll cites long lived Crowley collaborator Gerald Yorke as being mystified that people made an icon out of Aleister Crowley in the 1970's because if any of them had ever met him they would have all been totally repulsed. He only had any magnetic attraction for the weirdest of the weirdest of the weirdest when he was alive.

    Replies: @Mikhail, @Another Polish Perspective

    Probably, there is this Somerset Maugham novel which depicts him as a sleazy weirdo with magnetic powers over women: “The Magician”.

  843. @Ivashka the fool
    @Sean

    It were Chubais and Berezovskyi that brought him first to Yeltsin'a daughter who was the gateway to her ailing drunkard papa. But before meeting Yeltsin, Pynya got along well with the mafia boss Barsukov from the Tambov bratky gang. The reason why Pynya got along with Barsukov that well, was that he understood that big bucks needed be made at the time in the Sovok which was morphing into RusFed. That it was the only thing that mattered. Actually, it is still the only thing that matters to him and his circle, they are materialistic hedonists at their very core. Ideology, philosophy, power, to them are just a packaging, good for the lokhy - the naive imbeciles that exist only to be manipulated, used and abused. As the Blatnoy saying goes: the lokh isn't like the mammoth, it will never go extinct...

    Anyone who thinks that Pynya is a Russian Nationalist, an Imperialist, an ideologically driven person of any kind - anyone who thinks that - is a lokh that doesn't know squat about RusFed.

    https://youtu.be/r5BcWKcn84Y

    Pelevin summarized it in the scene above. Pynya and his circle, some of whom were already in Yeltsin's service, privatized Russia, downgraded it to their scum-tier level of understanding, and made it into RusFed where they are the parasitic elite. That's about it. Not much worth discussing really.

    Replies: @Another Polish Perspective

    I don’t think Putin is a hedonist, he certainly isn’t Caligula or Nero or Heliogabal. He is just a Sovok who has some money but lacks imagination what to do with them.

    But what was the reason for such a great rise of mafia in Russia after the fall of Soviet Union? It has always astonished me, taking into account how relatively “enlightened” Soviet Union culture was. One would expect that a multitude of social organisations would appear and thousands flowers of social activity would bloom, but in reality mainly weeds and bushes had arisen.
    It almost looked like Mexico, with some part of population almost having criminal tendencies, showing their innate brutality, and “being a criminal”, even brutal one, becoming a respectable way of life.

    To compare, in Poland there was also a low-level mafia (more like large-scale trade with untaxed alcohol etc than muscle-based “rekiet”) in the 90’ties, but it was largely defeated until Poland’s EU accession.

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @Another Polish Perspective


    He is just a Sovok who has some money but lacks imagination what to do with them.
     
    That would be exactly a hedonist. Your other examples are psychological pervs of the type we now have in the Western elites.

    It almost looked like Mexico, with some part of population almost having criminal tendencies, showing their innate brutality, and “being a criminal”, even brutal one, becoming a respectable way of life
     
    Have you read Dostoievsky? Add to that Varlam Shalamov and Igor Shafarevich and you get the answer. Toxic mix of Russian extremism, GULAG Blatnoy Mir traditions and a lawless Jewish underclass catalyst = social catastrophe by the late 1940ies but it was supressed under the Soviet totalitarian control only to come back with vengeance once it crumbled.

    Poles have been tamed by the Latin Church and their elites, socially the Poles I have known were Western people. Russians are not.

    In the video above, posted by Sean, a man walks in the forest and sees a bear, then films himself going in and kicking the bear (which tries to calmly walk away) for no reason. When the bear attacks the man (who is lucky to have survived) the man stands up and says in Russian: "the son of a b☆tch has biten through my hand" as if he was surprised that it happened. Russians are often crazy tough - безумие и отвага.

    Imagine people like this one needing moneys in the early 90ies, do you think some regulation would have stopped him ? They had to kill each other for a few years before the craziest got eliminated.

    The Poles OTOH just sold the "Polish soup" makeshift morphine extract in Coca-Cola bottles, and made a few hundred thousand bucks, before going to London as a proverbial Polish plumber, that was enough for their level of пассионарность.

    Russians and Ukrainians still have the ancient Slav in them, with everything it entails, both good or bad. Other Slavs underwent a domestication under their elites.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

  844. @Another Polish Perspective
    @Ivashka the fool

    I don't think Putin is a hedonist, he certainly isn't Caligula or Nero or Heliogabal. He is just a Sovok who has some money but lacks imagination what to do with them.


    But what was the reason for such a great rise of mafia in Russia after the fall of Soviet Union? It has always astonished me, taking into account how relatively "enlightened" Soviet Union culture was. One would expect that a multitude of social organisations would appear and thousands flowers of social activity would bloom, but in reality mainly weeds and bushes had arisen.
    It almost looked like Mexico, with some part of population almost having criminal tendencies, showing their innate brutality, and "being a criminal", even brutal one, becoming a respectable way of life.

    To compare, in Poland there was also a low-level mafia (more like large-scale trade with untaxed alcohol etc than muscle-based "rekiet") in the 90'ties, but it was largely defeated until Poland's EU accession.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

    He is just a Sovok who has some money but lacks imagination what to do with them.

    That would be exactly a hedonist. Your other examples are psychological pervs of the type we now have in the Western elites.

    It almost looked like Mexico, with some part of population almost having criminal tendencies, showing their innate brutality, and “being a criminal”, even brutal one, becoming a respectable way of life

    Have you read Dostoievsky? Add to that Varlam Shalamov and Igor Shafarevich and you get the answer. Toxic mix of Russian extremism, GULAG Blatnoy Mir traditions and a lawless Jewish underclass catalyst = social catastrophe by the late 1940ies but it was supressed under the Soviet totalitarian control only to come back with vengeance once it crumbled.

    Poles have been tamed by the Latin Church and their elites, socially the Poles I have known were Western people. Russians are not.

    In the video above, posted by Sean, a man walks in the forest and sees a bear, then films himself going in and kicking the bear (which tries to calmly walk away) for no reason. When the bear attacks the man (who is lucky to have survived) the man stands up and says in Russian: “the son of a b☆tch has biten through my hand” as if he was surprised that it happened. Russians are often crazy tough – безумие и отвага.

    Imagine people like this one needing moneys in the early 90ies, do you think some regulation would have stopped him ? They had to kill each other for a few years before the craziest got eliminated.

    The Poles OTOH just sold the “Polish soup” makeshift morphine extract in Coca-Cola bottles, and made a few hundred thousand bucks, before going to London as a proverbial Polish plumber, that was enough for their level of пассионарность.

    Russians and Ukrainians still have the ancient Slav in them, with everything it entails, both good or bad. Other Slavs underwent a domestication under their elites.

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @Ivashka the fool

    Speaking of hedonism:


    Yesterday, the State Duma adopted a law on the compulsory work of schoolchildren under the argument “we must fight the consumer society” (literal quote from the chairman of the State Duma Committee on Education Olga Kazakova from United Russia).
    But the authorities themselves consume like crazy, and they do not intend to refuse this. In Karachay-Cherkessia, they arrested the Deputy Prime Minister Irina Gerbekova, who was in charge of healthcare and the social sphere in the region. According to investigators, she stole 100 million rubles. from the budget.
    And here's how she used it:
    “The search footage of Ms. Gerbekova’s household in Cherkessk shows a collection of 120 pairs of branded shoes and 70 bags from Louis Vuitton, Armani, Gucci and other famous fashion houses.”
     
    https://t.me/tolk_tolk/16417

    Pynya just has more stolen moneys to spend...

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @QCIC, @Another Polish Perspective

  845. @AP
    @John Johnson


    Well it ain’t happening dwarf, you’re a loser Tsar like Nicholas II.
     
    He is much worse than Nicholas II. Nicky oversaw population growth, innovation, more improvement and a better country under his rule He just made a colossal mistake.

    Replies: @John Johnson, @Mr. XYZ, @Sean

    Nicky oversaw population growth

    Not difficult when Ukraine was part of ones realm.With its fertile land, Ukraine had been over populated for a very long time, but the Tsarist regime failed in getting people to go and settle underpopulated Siberia. Selling the wheat would have provided capital to industrialise and import technology, but rural overpopulation in the Ukraine especially was eating up the surplus. Hence, the Holodomor. The soundness of the Soviet solution for rural overpopulation was recognised by young economists of Nazi Germany who were planning on the exploitation of the East.

    As the Germans saw it, the Jewish problem in Galicia was also one of overpopulation; Jews having outgrown their historical niche and being so extremely numerous they were monopolizing small cottage industry type business and trading right down to door to door peddling from a suitcase, thereby blocking the Poles from ever developing a middle class.

  846. @Ivashka the fool
    @Another Polish Perspective


    He is just a Sovok who has some money but lacks imagination what to do with them.
     
    That would be exactly a hedonist. Your other examples are psychological pervs of the type we now have in the Western elites.

    It almost looked like Mexico, with some part of population almost having criminal tendencies, showing their innate brutality, and “being a criminal”, even brutal one, becoming a respectable way of life
     
    Have you read Dostoievsky? Add to that Varlam Shalamov and Igor Shafarevich and you get the answer. Toxic mix of Russian extremism, GULAG Blatnoy Mir traditions and a lawless Jewish underclass catalyst = social catastrophe by the late 1940ies but it was supressed under the Soviet totalitarian control only to come back with vengeance once it crumbled.

    Poles have been tamed by the Latin Church and their elites, socially the Poles I have known were Western people. Russians are not.

    In the video above, posted by Sean, a man walks in the forest and sees a bear, then films himself going in and kicking the bear (which tries to calmly walk away) for no reason. When the bear attacks the man (who is lucky to have survived) the man stands up and says in Russian: "the son of a b☆tch has biten through my hand" as if he was surprised that it happened. Russians are often crazy tough - безумие и отвага.

    Imagine people like this one needing moneys in the early 90ies, do you think some regulation would have stopped him ? They had to kill each other for a few years before the craziest got eliminated.

    The Poles OTOH just sold the "Polish soup" makeshift morphine extract in Coca-Cola bottles, and made a few hundred thousand bucks, before going to London as a proverbial Polish plumber, that was enough for their level of пассионарность.

    Russians and Ukrainians still have the ancient Slav in them, with everything it entails, both good or bad. Other Slavs underwent a domestication under their elites.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

    Speaking of hedonism:

    Yesterday, the State Duma adopted a law on the compulsory work of schoolchildren under the argument “we must fight the consumer society” (literal quote from the chairman of the State Duma Committee on Education Olga Kazakova from United Russia).
    But the authorities themselves consume like crazy, and they do not intend to refuse this. In Karachay-Cherkessia, they arrested the Deputy Prime Minister Irina Gerbekova, who was in charge of healthcare and the social sphere in the region. According to investigators, she stole 100 million rubles. from the budget.
    And here’s how she used it:
    “The search footage of Ms. Gerbekova’s household in Cherkessk shows a collection of 120 pairs of branded shoes and 70 bags from Louis Vuitton, Armani, Gucci and other famous fashion houses.”

    https://t.me/tolk_tolk/16417

    Pynya just has more stolen moneys to spend…

    • Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
    @Ivashka the fool

    Did she watch Kim Kardashian's TV show? I know a programmer whose ex-wife died with a stash of two hundred pairs shoes, fifty handbags, luxury logos. His divorce lawyer bills were almost the price of a house.

    , @QCIC
    @Ivashka the fool

    Considering the powerful and dangerous forces arrayed against Russian society in the 1990's, both internal and external, do you think the transition from late-Soviet communism to what exists now could have gone much better? Not should it have gone better, but could it have gone better? There is always hope, but some of the bastards involved on all sides were pretty dangerous and still are.

    What people or ideas would have been powerful enough to keep those dangers under control while supporting the growth of a more moral culture we hope for?

    , @Another Polish Perspective
    @Ivashka the fool

    Yes, and hedonism without imagination.... Just to go to shop and buy all available variations of one article on shelves. Really easy. But boring. So no redeeming qualities, no. Not even fun - so she can't be a modern Marie Antoinette, no.


    The search footage of Ms. Gerbekova’s household in Cherkessk shows a collection of 120 pairs of branded shoes and 70 bags from Louis Vuitton, Armani, Gucci and other famous fashion houses.

     

    Clearly the woman is in urgent need of reeducation in Gulag. 2 years, I say...?!

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

  847. @Mr. XYZ
    @Wokechoke

    Croatia literally has virtually no blacks:

    https://i.redd.it/0512b934jlx81.jpg

    Replies: @Wokechoke

    Look at France. It will spill over…

    I’ve been to this part of the world a lot. The port cities in the Bari are Blackett black. Then you have Albania.

  848. @Mr. XYZ
    @John Johnson

    Not killing Lenin and Trotsky and Stalin was definitely a mistake. Those three should have definitely been killed, especially Lenin. Though I don't know if this was actually clear without the benefit of hindsight. (Makes one wonder if Nicky II's inaction on this front was an inspiration for Putin to likely be much more active on this front, unfortunately?)

    Russia was not losing WWI when Nicky got overthrown. However, the war would have likely turned against the Allies had the US not entered WWI in 1917 due to the unsecured loans that the US provided to the Allies. Britain was in a very dire financial situation by 1917 before the US's unsecured loans starting coming in. Adam Tooze's book The Deluge covers this topic in extensive detail.

    Replies: @Wokechoke

    The issue with Britain in ww1 is that they didn’t have to resort to emergency measures and radically change the economy to rationing and a command economy or nationalisation. Capitalism in the UK was in serious trouble, it never ended though, but fighting could go on for years and years under a command economy if it came to that. What the US did was to save the system before having to resort to that extreme.

    In ww2 the British nationalised almost everything and resorted to rationing. Which did collapse the previous system. A much more serious crisis.

    • Thanks: Mr. XYZ
  849. @LatW
    @Mr. XYZ


    Where exactly did she say that she awaits blacks in Paris? She opposes miscegenation, after all.
     
    I never did and never would say anything of the sort. He simply made that up (e.g., lied).

    He has no knowledge (and no empathy) about what it's like for a white woman to walk in downtown in places such as Strasbourg or Brussels (even dressed in normal, non flashy or revealing clothing, in completely normal, supposedly safe parts of the town). And, of course, he has done exactly nothing to alleviate this situation. That's why he has to dream up a myth about Russia as a savior, so he doesn't have to look himself in the eyes and address his shame.

    He can only crap on people like Denis Rex (who would change the situation immediately, if given a chance).

    Replies: @Wokechoke

    You stated that you wouldn’t mind the erasure of a white Europe as long as the darkies who inherited it would keep speaking Latvian in your particular corner of Europe. Just economics you said.

    • Replies: @LatW
    @Wokechoke


    You stated that you wouldn’t mind the erasure of a white Europe as long as the darkies who inherited it would keep speaking Latvian in your particular corner of Europe. Just economics you said.
     
    I never said anything like that. What I may have said is that it doesn't matter if a country is in the EU or not, once a country reaches a certain level of GDP per capita, it will have this issue. And that this is a global economic phenomenon.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Wokechoke

  850. Looks like the largest nuclear power plant in Europe is being at a serious risk of sabotage. Both RusFed and Ukrostan accuse each other of being ready to destroy its cooling pond. That would be an interesting experiment (sarcasm).

    • Replies: @A123
    @Ivashka the fool


    Looks like the largest nuclear power plant in Europe is being at a serious risk of sabotage.
     
    Zelensky is depraved enough to attempt such a False Flag operation. However, that plot was exposed about a week ago, as I previously noted (1).

    Fallout travels east, so Putin will do everything possible to protect the plant from Kiev aggression. Damaging the facility to get rid of Zelensky is a bad trade for Russia. Therefore, if something happens to ZPP everyone will know that Ukraine is responsible.

    PEACE 😇
    ___________

    (1) https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-222/#comment-6024595

    Replies: @AP

    , @QCIC
    @Ivashka the fool

    I was worried about ZPP from the beginning. Fortunately, it may be cooled off enough now that the risks are not so great.

    Now I worry more about the nuclear plants on the West side of the river. The US and UK do not care about contamination in Ukraine. Are these plants still operating?

  851. A123 says: • Website

    Is France about to fall? (1)

    France turns into war zone as second night of riots slam country, viral videos show police stations, city halls and dozens of cars torched

    The riots are being described as the worst violence the country has seen since the nationwide riots in 2005

    France descended into a second night of mayhem as riots spread from Paris to other cities following the shooting death of 17-year-old French-Algerian Nahel M., who prosecutors say was driving without a license and has a long juvenile history of crimes.

    As Remix News reported yesterday in a video segment, a police officer discharged his firearm at Nahel as the suspect was attempting to speed away from a police stop, with the incident caught on film. Although the officer was arrested and charged, the incident sparked widespread riots in the Paris suburb of Nanterre. However, the second night saw far more violence, with multiple police stations, cars, city halls, and prefectures torched across the country as shocking footage of the riots continued to spread throughout social media.



    Video Link

    International media outlets, such as the BBC, have failed to mention that the suspect was wanted by police for previous incidents involving driving without a license and resisting arrest.

    There are many additional videos in the article.

    If France is to survive as a nation it will have to adopt Hungarian style migration policies. Then, begin mass expulsions of the current undesirable migrant population. Sending them home would be the first choice. With aid cut off many will self deport to nearby progressive EU countries, such as Germany, for both sanctuary and a new teat to suck.

    PEACE 😇
    __________

    (1) https://rmx.news/crime/france-turns-into-war-zone-as-second-night-of-riots-slams-country-viral-videos-show-police-stations-city-halls-and-dozens-of-cars-torched/

    • Replies: @Coconuts
    @A123


    The riots are being described as the worst violence the country has seen since the nationwide riots in 2005
     
    There is a clue in this part that France is unlikely to fall, OTOH some of the commentary I've listened to does talk in strong terms, about 'a situation of violence developing that it will be hard to put a name to'.

    I think France already had an issue with political and social divisions leading to civil strife before mass immigration. These disturbances would be another indication this old tendency has been given a new lease of life.

    Lasting deep political divisions among the Français de souche population may be one of the blocks on stronger action against immigration.

    In other news, in the UK it seems Nigel Farage's bank recently tried to take his accounts away, and no bank would allow him to open a new one:

    https://www.spiked-online.com/2023/06/30/nigel-farage-and-the-corporate-war-on-dissent/

    Interesting given that he is one of the best known and most controversial politicians in Britain.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @A123

  852. A123 says: • Website
    @Ivashka the fool
    Looks like the largest nuclear power plant in Europe is being at a serious risk of sabotage. Both RusFed and Ukrostan accuse each other of being ready to destroy its cooling pond. That would be an interesting experiment (sarcasm).

    Replies: @A123, @QCIC

    Looks like the largest nuclear power plant in Europe is being at a serious risk of sabotage.

    Zelensky is depraved enough to attempt such a False Flag operation. However, that plot was exposed about a week ago, as I previously noted (1).

    Fallout travels east, so Putin will do everything possible to protect the plant from Kiev aggression. Damaging the facility to get rid of Zelensky is a bad trade for Russia. Therefore, if something happens to ZPP everyone will know that Ukraine is responsible.

    PEACE 😇
    ___________

    (1) https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-222/#comment-6024595

    • Replies: @AP
    @A123


    Zelensky is depraved enough to attempt such a False Flag operation. However, that plot was exposed about a week ago, as I previously noted (1).
     
    Zelensky does not control the plant.

    Fallout travels east, so Putin will do everything possible to protect the plant from Kiev aggression. Damaging the facility to get rid of Zelensky is a bad trade for Russia. Therefore, if something happens to ZPP everyone will know that Ukraine is responsible.
     
    It’s scorched Earth.

    As I wrote last year, if something happens while the Ukrainians are collapsing or retreating it would probably be the Ukrainians’ fault. If the plant blew up in early 2022 I would blame the Ukrainians.

    If it blows up as the Russians are retreating it is clearly going to be the Russians’ fault. One doesn’t do scorched Earth on lands that one is taking, but in lands that one is leaving, to make them useless for the incoming enemy.

    Right now, winds are blowing towards Russia but they are supposed to shift late next week and blow towards southern Ukraine (and Romania). That will be a dangerous time. Hopefully Russia doesn’t do anything.

    If the below is true, it is disturbing news:



    https://twitter.com/maria_drutska/status/1674663837260185603?s=46&t=Qz3eXZWFYIvyHmaAk32tcg
  853. @Mikel
    @John Johnson


    they also have a completely controlled state media that tells them how to think. Journalists that question the war end up in prison.
     
    I wonder where people like you (or your splitting images, the Western Putin fans like Anglin and McGregor) come from. Have you ever watched any popular Russian TV debate show subtitled in English, like Soloviov's? Just once? Do you know who Russian war correspondents Rybar and Wargonzo are and how their reporting is regularly used by Western pro-Ukrainian sources to provide objective information on the course of the war?

    Heck, are you even capable of processing the fact that right here we have just been visited by a notorious Moscow blogger who is publicly comparing Putin to a chimpanzee every day and actually promoting treason?

    With all the things one can criticize Putin and his regime for, why invent equivocal ones? And when one is engaged in such inventions, why choose the one that actually applies to the Ukrainians much more than to the Russians? Even on this blog we have the revealing fact that not one single ethnic Ukrainian, as far as I know, found it fit to criticize the Ukrainian government when it was killing its own civilians but we do have a number of Russians who criticized their government from the start of the war.

    Besides, Zelensky has just received Greta Thunberg's visit in Kiev and that's just too much, even for a lifelong pacifist like me. F*ck Kiev and all it stands for today.

    Replies: @Wielgus, @sudden death, @John Johnson

    Allowed active public war criticism/reporting in RF media is about that how RF forces are bad at killing Ukrainians efficiently, those who are against invasions in and killings of neighbouring people in principle, no matter how succesfully it could be done, are thrown in jail with multiple years sentences.

    There is plenty of intra-UA war efficiency criticism of such type going in Kiev too, you’re either not following it or unfamiliar with them (eg. Yuri Kasjanov, Yuri Biriukov, Yuri Butusov et al), all of them are very critical Zelensky or regarding everyday military inner UA matters and problems.

    • Replies: @sudden death
    @sudden death


    Censor.NET Editor-in-Chief Yuri Butusov said in an interview with Radio NV that during the offensive, the Ukrainian Armed Forces are far from succeeding in everything and there are no grounds for an early end to the war.

    “Far from everything succeeds, far from everything is correctly analyzed and tasks and planning are defined,” Butusov said in an interview with Radio NV.

    According to the journalist, he recently saw Ukrainian fighters fighting in the south.
    “There are many impressions, there are, in principle, a lot of positive things that I saw - this is the motivation of our people. Despite the very heavy losses that the Ukrainian people suffered and continue to suffer in this war, our army's confidence that we will win, the confidence of our soldiers, their combat effectiveness is growing. And people become even tougher, even more motivated, more professional in this terrible struggle,” he said.

    Butusov stressed that the losses among the Ukrainian military are “irreparable things for us,” because these are the people who could hasten the victory of Ukraine.

    “Therefore, the death of people is also, unfortunately, an occasion for criticizing the actions and command in some cases, and the strategic planning of our leadership,” the journalist said.

    He noted that all people at the front understand that the war will be very long and there is no reason to think that everything will end quickly.
    “We need a long-term strategy; unfortunately, we do not have this long-term military-political strategy. Many problems, many victims arise precisely from the fact that we still lack a strategy, ”Butusov believes.
     
    https://nv.ua/ukraine/events/kogda-zakonchitsya-voyna-v-ukraine-butusov-rasskazal-o-situacii-na-fronte-novosti-ukrainy-50334909.html
    , @Mikel
    @sudden death


    those who are against invasions in and killings of neighbouring people in principle, no matter how succesfully it could be done, are thrown in jail with multiple years sentences.
     
    You are surely much more familiar with the Russian and Ukrainian media landscape than me and have the advantage of speaking Russian but I think you are clearly exaggerating. That famous reporter who criticized the war live on TV at the beginning wasn't imprisoned. If my memory doesn't fail, she was let go with a fine (not dissimilar to what would happen in many Western countries under a war scenario). And that girl from St Petersburg who was arrested for participating in anti-war protests was later equally free to continue her political activities and actually hand over a lethal bomb to a pro-war activist.

    Thanks for the information about Ukrainian journalists critical of the authorities. I'll check them out for sure. But I find the idea that in Russia people are free to criticize the Kremlin just as long as they are more extremist than the Kremlin itself more than questionable. There has just been a coup attempt and some of the Russian sources I followed during the events (including AK) were clearly sympathetic with the attempt to overthrow the regime, which is by no means surprising considering how viciously they had been attacking the Kremlin. Is there any equivalent of this in Ukraine? Who would be the Ukrainian counterpart of Strelkov (who has just founded an anti-Kremlin political movement at war time)?

    Now, this doesn't mean that in Russia you cannot be poisoned or suicided and that part of the tolerance of dissent may be just due to low state capacity but from where I stand, I think that what AK once said about Russia having in practical terms more freedom of expression than many modern Western countries looks true.

    Anyway, Zelensky just received Greta in Kiev... What's next? Dylan Mulvaney? Lia Thomas? A BLM delegation? Is there no depth he's unwilling to fall to in order to garner the support of all the worst elements of Western societies?

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @AP

  854. @Ivashka the fool
    @Ivashka the fool

    Speaking of hedonism:


    Yesterday, the State Duma adopted a law on the compulsory work of schoolchildren under the argument “we must fight the consumer society” (literal quote from the chairman of the State Duma Committee on Education Olga Kazakova from United Russia).
    But the authorities themselves consume like crazy, and they do not intend to refuse this. In Karachay-Cherkessia, they arrested the Deputy Prime Minister Irina Gerbekova, who was in charge of healthcare and the social sphere in the region. According to investigators, she stole 100 million rubles. from the budget.
    And here's how she used it:
    “The search footage of Ms. Gerbekova’s household in Cherkessk shows a collection of 120 pairs of branded shoes and 70 bags from Louis Vuitton, Armani, Gucci and other famous fashion houses.”
     
    https://t.me/tolk_tolk/16417

    Pynya just has more stolen moneys to spend...

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @QCIC, @Another Polish Perspective

    Did she watch Kim Kardashian’s TV show? I know a programmer whose ex-wife died with a stash of two hundred pairs shoes, fifty handbags, luxury logos. His divorce lawyer bills were almost the price of a house.

  855. @Ivashka the fool
    @Ivashka the fool

    Speaking of hedonism:


    Yesterday, the State Duma adopted a law on the compulsory work of schoolchildren under the argument “we must fight the consumer society” (literal quote from the chairman of the State Duma Committee on Education Olga Kazakova from United Russia).
    But the authorities themselves consume like crazy, and they do not intend to refuse this. In Karachay-Cherkessia, they arrested the Deputy Prime Minister Irina Gerbekova, who was in charge of healthcare and the social sphere in the region. According to investigators, she stole 100 million rubles. from the budget.
    And here's how she used it:
    “The search footage of Ms. Gerbekova’s household in Cherkessk shows a collection of 120 pairs of branded shoes and 70 bags from Louis Vuitton, Armani, Gucci and other famous fashion houses.”
     
    https://t.me/tolk_tolk/16417

    Pynya just has more stolen moneys to spend...

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @QCIC, @Another Polish Perspective

    Considering the powerful and dangerous forces arrayed against Russian society in the 1990’s, both internal and external, do you think the transition from late-Soviet communism to what exists now could have gone much better? Not should it have gone better, but could it have gone better? There is always hope, but some of the bastards involved on all sides were pretty dangerous and still are.

    What people or ideas would have been powerful enough to keep those dangers under control while supporting the growth of a more moral culture we hope for?

  856. AP says:
    @Dmitry
    Putin is not nearly as bad as Nicholas II so far. But if people even begin this discussion, it's a symptom of his loss of image even in this forum.

    For example, this invasion of Ukraine by Putin could be already as bad as the Nikolai's war with Japan, obviously it's not as bad as the First World War which has resulted with killing of around 2 million Russian soldiers.

    Replies: @AP

    Putin is not nearly as bad as Nicholas II so far.

    Putin is not nearly as good as Nicholas II, until Nicholas’s colossal mistake of getting into World War I. Under Nicholas Russia experienced it’s silver age of culture, Stolypin’s reforms brought prosperity to much of the countryside, Russia rapidly industrialized and entered the ranks of the most industrialized powers. Nicholas’s Russia performed poorly against Japan in 1905 but by 1914 it had improved sufficiently that it had defeated both Austria-Hungary and the Ottoman Empire, while holding on vs. Germany. Compare to Putin’s Russia which is stalemating and slowly losing its grip over Ukraine.

    No ruler of Russia after Nicholas has been better than Nicholas. Lenin and Stalin killed millions of Russians in peacetime (even more than were lost during World War I), and Stalin’s mistakes versus little Germany cost tens of millions more (those two criminals squandered Russia’s meteoric rise), Khrushchev and Brezhnev and oversaw modest improvement followed by stagnation, Gorbachev and Yeltsin oversaw collapse, Putin showed decent recovery but has thrown it all away.

    For example, this invasion of Ukraine by Putin could be already as bad as the Nikolai’s war with Japan

    It’s worse. Not only is Putin’s war against a much smaller and weaker country, but the Russian Empire lost 43,000-70,000 dead total due to KIA, fatal wounds and disease against Japan. Despite the existence of modern medicine, Russia has managed to lose more dead versus Ukraine (full number is unknown but it was around 30,000 in December before Bakhmut and the newest offensive, so must be at least 80,000 and probably over 100,000 by now).

    • Agree: Ivashka the fool
    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @AP


    and entered the ranks of the most industrialized powers.
     
    Not on a per capita basis. Not anywhere close, in fact. On a total basis, possibly (due to its sheer population), but it was still behind the US, UK, and Germany.

    but by 1914 it had improved sufficiently that it had defeated both Austria-Hungary and the Ottoman Empire,
     
    Russia was not powerful enough to stop the Armenian Genocide, though. The smarter diplomatic move on Russia's part would have been to offer territorial concessions to the Ottoman Empire (a return of some or all of the territories that it took from the Ottomans back in 1877-1878) in exchange for Ottoman neutrality during WWI. This would have likely prevented the Armenian Genocide (since the Ottomans would not have wanted Russian intervention) and might have kept the Straits open, which, if so, would have allowed the Western Entente Powers to send large amounts of aid to Russia, thus possibly preventing one or both Russian Revolutions in 1917 and allowing Russia to win WWI faster due to Russia not having the distraction of the Ottoman Front.

    Russia did a miserable job in WWI in maintaining order on the home front, even in comparison to other countries with a similar level of development such as Austria-Hungary, Italy, and the Ottoman Empire. Russia experienced two revolutions in the middle of WWI while none of the other three countries mentioned above did.

    No ruler of Russia after Nicholas has been better than Nicholas. Lenin and Stalin killed millions of Russians in peacetime (even more than were lost during World War I), and Stalin’s mistakes versus little Germany cost tens of millions more (those two criminals squandered Russia’s meteoric rise), Khrushchev and Brezhnev and oversaw modest improvement followed by stagnation, Gorbachev and Yeltsin oversaw collapse, Putin showed decent recovery but has thrown it all away.
     
    Andropov?

    Also, Gorbachev was good for the Balts and, long-term*, for Ukrainians as well. They might not have reacquired their independence without him. Less so for Russians, unfortunately.

    *Because Ukrainians still largely had a Sovok mentality post-independence (unlike the Balts), they weren't quite sure what they were supposed to do with their independence for the next 20+ years. But thankfully this appears to be significantly changing by now.

    It’s worse. Not only is Putin’s war against a much smaller and weaker country, but the Russian Empire lost 43,000-70,000 dead total due to KIA, fatal wounds and disease against Japan. Despite the existence of modern medicine, Russia has managed to lose more dead versus Ukraine (full number is unknown but it was around 30,000 in December before Bakhmut and the newest offensive, so must be at least 80,000 and probably over 100,000 by now).
     
    Worth noting that Russia's war against Japan was utterly irrelevant in the grand scheme of things. Losing south Sakhalin meant nothing to Russia long-term. Ditto for losing Manchuria.

    Replies: @Wokechoke

  857. @sudden death
    @Mikel

    Allowed active public war criticism/reporting in RF media is about that how RF forces are bad at killing Ukrainians efficiently, those who are against invasions in and killings of neighbouring people in principle, no matter how succesfully it could be done, are thrown in jail with multiple years sentences.

    There is plenty of intra-UA war efficiency criticism of such type going in Kiev too, you're either not following it or unfamiliar with them (eg. Yuri Kasjanov, Yuri Biriukov, Yuri Butusov et al), all of them are very critical Zelensky or regarding everyday military inner UA matters and problems.

    Replies: @sudden death, @Mikel

    Censor.NET Editor-in-Chief Yuri Butusov said in an interview with Radio NV that during the offensive, the Ukrainian Armed Forces are far from succeeding in everything and there are no grounds for an early end to the war.

    “Far from everything succeeds, far from everything is correctly analyzed and tasks and planning are defined,” Butusov said in an interview with Radio NV.

    According to the journalist, he recently saw Ukrainian fighters fighting in the south.
    “There are many impressions, there are, in principle, a lot of positive things that I saw – this is the motivation of our people. Despite the very heavy losses that the Ukrainian people suffered and continue to suffer in this war, our army’s confidence that we will win, the confidence of our soldiers, their combat effectiveness is growing. And people become even tougher, even more motivated, more professional in this terrible struggle,” he said.

    Butusov stressed that the losses among the Ukrainian military are “irreparable things for us,” because these are the people who could hasten the victory of Ukraine.

    “Therefore, the death of people is also, unfortunately, an occasion for criticizing the actions and command in some cases, and the strategic planning of our leadership,” the journalist said.

    He noted that all people at the front understand that the war will be very long and there is no reason to think that everything will end quickly.
    “We need a long-term strategy; unfortunately, we do not have this long-term military-political strategy. Many problems, many victims arise precisely from the fact that we still lack a strategy, ”Butusov believes.

    https://nv.ua/ukraine/events/kogda-zakonchitsya-voyna-v-ukraine-butusov-rasskazal-o-situacii-na-fronte-novosti-ukrainy-50334909.html

    • Thanks: Mikel
  858. AP says:
    @A123
    @Ivashka the fool


    Looks like the largest nuclear power plant in Europe is being at a serious risk of sabotage.
     
    Zelensky is depraved enough to attempt such a False Flag operation. However, that plot was exposed about a week ago, as I previously noted (1).

    Fallout travels east, so Putin will do everything possible to protect the plant from Kiev aggression. Damaging the facility to get rid of Zelensky is a bad trade for Russia. Therefore, if something happens to ZPP everyone will know that Ukraine is responsible.

    PEACE 😇
    ___________

    (1) https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-222/#comment-6024595

    Replies: @AP

    Zelensky is depraved enough to attempt such a False Flag operation. However, that plot was exposed about a week ago, as I previously noted (1).

    Zelensky does not control the plant.

    Fallout travels east, so Putin will do everything possible to protect the plant from Kiev aggression. Damaging the facility to get rid of Zelensky is a bad trade for Russia. Therefore, if something happens to ZPP everyone will know that Ukraine is responsible.

    It’s scorched Earth.

    As I wrote last year, if something happens while the Ukrainians are collapsing or retreating it would probably be the Ukrainians’ fault. If the plant blew up in early 2022 I would blame the Ukrainians.

    If it blows up as the Russians are retreating it is clearly going to be the Russians’ fault. One doesn’t do scorched Earth on lands that one is taking, but in lands that one is leaving, to make them useless for the incoming enemy.

    Right now, winds are blowing towards Russia but they are supposed to shift late next week and blow towards southern Ukraine (and Romania). That will be a dangerous time. Hopefully Russia doesn’t do anything.

    If the below is true, it is disturbing news:

    [MORE]

  859. @Ivashka the fool
    Looks like the largest nuclear power plant in Europe is being at a serious risk of sabotage. Both RusFed and Ukrostan accuse each other of being ready to destroy its cooling pond. That would be an interesting experiment (sarcasm).

    Replies: @A123, @QCIC

    I was worried about ZPP from the beginning. Fortunately, it may be cooled off enough now that the risks are not so great.

    Now I worry more about the nuclear plants on the West side of the river. The US and UK do not care about contamination in Ukraine. Are these plants still operating?

  860. @A123
    Is France about to fall? (1)

    France turns into war zone as second night of riots slam country, viral videos show police stations, city halls and dozens of cars torched

    The riots are being described as the worst violence the country has seen since the nationwide riots in 2005

     

    France descended into a second night of mayhem as riots spread from Paris to other cities following the shooting death of 17-year-old French-Algerian Nahel M., who prosecutors say was driving without a license and has a long juvenile history of crimes.

    As Remix News reported yesterday in a video segment, a police officer discharged his firearm at Nahel as the suspect was attempting to speed away from a police stop, with the incident caught on film. Although the officer was arrested and charged, the incident sparked widespread riots in the Paris suburb of Nanterre. However, the second night saw far more violence, with multiple police stations, cars, city halls, and prefectures torched across the country as shocking footage of the riots continued to spread throughout social media.

    https://rumble.com/embed/v2u9i23/

    International media outlets, such as the BBC, have failed to mention that the suspect was wanted by police for previous incidents involving driving without a license and resisting arrest.

     

    There are many additional videos in the article.

    If France is to survive as a nation it will have to adopt Hungarian style migration policies. Then, begin mass expulsions of the current undesirable migrant population. Sending them home would be the first choice. With aid cut off many will self deport to nearby progressive EU countries, such as Germany, for both sanctuary and a new teat to suck.

    PEACE 😇
    __________

    (1) https://rmx.news/crime/france-turns-into-war-zone-as-second-night-of-riots-slams-country-viral-videos-show-police-stations-city-halls-and-dozens-of-cars-torched/

    Replies: @Coconuts

    The riots are being described as the worst violence the country has seen since the nationwide riots in 2005

    There is a clue in this part that France is unlikely to fall, OTOH some of the commentary I’ve listened to does talk in strong terms, about ‘a situation of violence developing that it will be hard to put a name to’.

    I think France already had an issue with political and social divisions leading to civil strife before mass immigration. These disturbances would be another indication this old tendency has been given a new lease of life.

    Lasting deep political divisions among the Français de souche population may be one of the blocks on stronger action against immigration.

    In other news, in the UK it seems Nigel Farage’s bank recently tried to take his accounts away, and no bank would allow him to open a new one:

    https://www.spiked-online.com/2023/06/30/nigel-farage-and-the-corporate-war-on-dissent/

    Interesting given that he is one of the best known and most controversial politicians in Britain.

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @Coconuts

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fzxr1-1X0AIxLkp.png

    Re Farage, imagine once we have the smart contract and the CBDC. It would be a game over for the dissidents. They already started freezing dissidents bank accounts in Canada during the truckers' Freedom Convoys.

    , @A123
    @Coconuts


    There is a clue in this part that France is unlikely to fall, OTOH some of the commentary I’ve listened to does talk in strong terms, about ‘a situation of violence developing that it will be hard to put a name to’. I think France already had an issue with political and social divisions leading to civil strife before mass immigration. These disturbances would be another indication this old tendency has been given a new lease of life.

     

    There are critical differences this time around. Macron is an exceedingly weak leader. And, his administration targeted the police. This has consequences: (1)

    Social unrest spread like cancer across French cities for a fourth consecutive night, with hundreds of buildings and vehicles set ablaze. President Emmanuel Macron's government struggled to contain the violence, which was sparked on Tuesday after a teenager was shot dead by a police officer.

    In an update on Saturday, France's Interior Ministry said 2,500 fires were reported overnight. Rioters set fire to 1,350 vehicles and 235 buildings nationwide. About 1,300 people were arrested, while the government mobilized 45,000 police officers with armored vehicles to quell the violence.

    According to The Telegraph, French police said they were "at war" with "savage hordes of vermin" on Friday night. The country's top police unions threatened revolt unless Macron's government restored law and order.
     
    There are new videos in the linked article.

    The police recognize the issue and are going to change strategy to protect themselves if Macron does not respond effectively. Will migrant areas be cordoned off and left to burn? That is the obvious choice to save the lives of French policemen.

    PEACE 😇
    __________

    (1) https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/french-police-say-were-war-vermin-nationwide-riots-spread-cancer

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

  861. Japan also lost the Russo-Japanese War:

    The First Sino-Japanese War (1894-95) was a major gamble for Japan but they got away with a huge territorial (Taiwan) and monetary ($5 billion 2015 USD) concession from Qing China.

    Russo-Japanese War was again a huge gamble. The Japanese scored a decisive victory over Baltic Fleet at Tsushima, but on land it was really a draw.

    The Russians drove a hard bargain at Treaty of Portsmouth, refused to pay reparations, and denied Japan territorial gains in Liaodong and Sakhalin.

    This infuriated the Japanese populace and led to a decade of internal unrest.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hibiya_incendiary_incident
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Era_of_Popular_Violence

    The Americans would begin encroaching in NE Asia, and until the Revolution Russia and Japan would have a quasi-alliance,

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japan–Russia_Secret_Agreement

    General Nogi Maresuke and his wife Shizuko committed suicide by seppuku shortly after the Emperor Meiji’s funeral in 1912. This was in accordance with the samurai practice of following one’s master to death.

    In his suicide letter, Nogi said that he wished to expiate for the terrible casualties suffered by his troops at Siege of Port Arthur.

    https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-188-russia-ukraine/#comment-5349128

    Chinese in general are not resentful about lost territories to Russia. Outer Manchuria is not critical for security of PRC, and it has abided by those borders upon Soviet breakup:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1991_Sino-Soviet_Border_Agreement

    Japanese are actually quite bitter about the Kuriles which is critical for its security — if PRC annexes Taiwan, Japan would be surrounded by China and Russia on the First Island Chain.

    • Agree: Ivashka the fool
    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    I have read a few times that if it was not for the 1905 revolutionary unrest in Tsarist Empire, an unrest financed and organized by the British, then Russia would have continued fighting and would have possibly won the war on land. Anyway, the war put the project of Yellow Russia to rest and that was a good thing, despite not being part of the Russian Empire, the Chinese volunteer troops played an important role in the early Red Army, imagine if it was an internal part of the Empire itself. The adventures of the Mad Baron, the Cossack atamans and the Red Commissars in the Mongolia/Manchuria would have had the additional background of an anti-Russian Empire Chinese uprising. That would have been way bloodier than it was in our time-line.

    , @John Johnson
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    Japan also lost the Russo-Japanese War:

    It was a draw but the Russians were completely embarrassed by the biggest upset in Naval history:
    https://historyincharts.com/who-won-the-russo-japanese-war/

    The Battle of Tsushima to this day is an embarrassment to the Russian Navy. It led to Japanese arrogance in WW2 and was cited in their attack on Pearl Harbor.

    Another case of a dopey Tsar thinking he can just show up and win. He didn't bother studying the Japanese Navy and their technological advancements. The British however did their homework and knew he would lose.

    Nicholas II didn't even learn from his mistakes. He did the same thing in WW1.

    A war dunce just like Putin.

    Then he lost his guts for war when the country needed him the most.

  862. @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms
    Japan also lost the Russo-Japanese War:

    The First Sino-Japanese War (1894-95) was a major gamble for Japan but they got away with a huge territorial (Taiwan) and monetary ($5 billion 2015 USD) concession from Qing China.

    Russo-Japanese War was again a huge gamble. The Japanese scored a decisive victory over Baltic Fleet at Tsushima, but on land it was really a draw.

    The Russians drove a hard bargain at Treaty of Portsmouth, refused to pay reparations, and denied Japan territorial gains in Liaodong and Sakhalin.

    This infuriated the Japanese populace and led to a decade of internal unrest.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hibiya_incendiary_incident
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Era_of_Popular_Violence

    The Americans would begin encroaching in NE Asia, and until the Revolution Russia and Japan would have a quasi-alliance,

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japan–Russia_Secret_Agreement

    General Nogi Maresuke and his wife Shizuko committed suicide by seppuku shortly after the Emperor Meiji’s funeral in 1912. This was in accordance with the samurai practice of following one’s master to death.

    In his suicide letter, Nogi said that he wished to expiate for the terrible casualties suffered by his troops at Siege of Port Arthur.
     

    https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-188-russia-ukraine/#comment-5349128

    Chinese in general are not resentful about lost territories to Russia. Outer Manchuria is not critical for security of PRC, and it has abided by those borders upon Soviet breakup:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1991_Sino-Soviet_Border_Agreement

    Japanese are actually quite bitter about the Kuriles which is critical for its security -- if PRC annexes Taiwan, Japan would be surrounded by China and Russia on the First Island Chain.

    https://i.postimg.cc/7LjRrkK4/main-qimg-c2bdd9bc26833b3ab95e8a3a7af80b0f-lq.jpg

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @John Johnson

    I have read a few times that if it was not for the 1905 revolutionary unrest in Tsarist Empire, an unrest financed and organized by the British, then Russia would have continued fighting and would have possibly won the war on land. Anyway, the war put the project of Yellow Russia to rest and that was a good thing, despite not being part of the Russian Empire, the Chinese volunteer troops played an important role in the early Red Army, imagine if it was an internal part of the Empire itself. The adventures of the Mad Baron, the Cossack atamans and the Red Commissars in the Mongolia/Manchuria would have had the additional background of an anti-Russian Empire Chinese uprising. That would have been way bloodier than it was in our time-line.

  863. @Coconuts
    @A123


    The riots are being described as the worst violence the country has seen since the nationwide riots in 2005
     
    There is a clue in this part that France is unlikely to fall, OTOH some of the commentary I've listened to does talk in strong terms, about 'a situation of violence developing that it will be hard to put a name to'.

    I think France already had an issue with political and social divisions leading to civil strife before mass immigration. These disturbances would be another indication this old tendency has been given a new lease of life.

    Lasting deep political divisions among the Français de souche population may be one of the blocks on stronger action against immigration.

    In other news, in the UK it seems Nigel Farage's bank recently tried to take his accounts away, and no bank would allow him to open a new one:

    https://www.spiked-online.com/2023/06/30/nigel-farage-and-the-corporate-war-on-dissent/

    Interesting given that he is one of the best known and most controversial politicians in Britain.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @A123

    Re Farage, imagine once we have the smart contract and the CBDC. It would be a game over for the dissidents. They already started freezing dissidents bank accounts in Canada during the truckers’ Freedom Convoys.

  864. Ah ça va bien quand même !

    https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/france-has-fallen-dramatic-footage-shows-social-unrest-spreading-third-night

    It didn’t prevent Macron from attending an Elton John show. It’s a matter of priorities and also of available opportunities. France burns every 2-3 months, French Muslim/French cops interactions are quite predictable, while the final Elton John’s tour is quite unique. He is an LGBTQ icon after all. Can you feel the love tonight…

    • LOL: silviosilver
  865. @AP
    @Gerard1234


    I already mentioned about the lack of ANY Ukrainian place names, like there are in North America for plenty of Russian, Dutch, French, British, even Armenian diasporas.
     
    The list is as long as you record of idiocy. But what can one expect from a semi-retarded Sovok "engineer"?:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Canadian_place_names_of_Ukrainian_origin



    Alberta

    Places in Edmonton
    Neighbourhoods
    Baturyn, Edmonton, after Baturyn, a historic castle town in northeastern Ukraine (Nizhyn Raion, Chernihiv Oblast).
    Oleskiw, Edmonton (formerly Wolf Willow Farms),[1] renamed in 1972 after Joseph Oleskiw (1860–1903), professor, writer and promoter of emigration.[2]
    Ozerna, Edmonton, literally "lake district".[1]
    Pylypow Industrial subdivision, after Ivan Pylypow,[1] early pioneer.[3]
    Parks
    Oleskiw Park,[1] after Joseph Oleskiw (1860–1903), professor, writer and promoter of emigration
    Ukrainian Millennium Park (now Primrose Park), for 1989, the one thousandth anniversary of the Baptism of Kiev (the founding of Christianity in Ukraine).[1]
    William Hawrelak Park, after former Edmonton mayor William Hawrelak.[4]
    Roads
    Eleniak Road, Edmonton, after Wasyl Eleniak,[5] early pioneer.[1]
    Schools
    Bishop Greschuk Catholic Elementary School, an Edmonton Catholic separate school.
    Bishop Savaryn Catholic Elementary School, an Edmonton Catholic separate school named after Bishop Nicholas Savaryn, the first leader of the Ukrainian Catholic Eparchy of Edmonton.
    St. Vladimir Catholic Elementary School, an Edmonton Catholic separate school named after St. Volodymyr the Great.
    Rural communities
    Bellis, Alberta, "white woods"; referring to poplars and birch.[6]
    Borsczow, Alberta,[7] northeast of Ryley on Secondary Highway 626; Polonized spelling of Borshchiv, Borshchiv Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Buchach, Alberta, the Buczacz School District No. 2580,[8] and St. Nicholas Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church (Hlus' Church), Buczacz; halfway between Innisfree and Musidora, Alberta off Secondary Highway 870 - from Buchach, Buchach Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Halych, Alberta (located in Westlock County, east of Tawatinaw[9]), from Halych - the historic city in Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast
    Ispas, Alberta,[10] southeast of Hamlin and northwest of Duvernay, Alberta on the south side of the North Saskatchewan River - after Ispas, Vyzhnytsia Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Jaroslaw School District No. 1478,[11] the Descent of the Holy Spirit Ukrainian Catholic Church, Jaroslaw;[12] and St. Demitrius Ukrainian Orthodox Church, Jaroslaw;[13] all northeast of Bruderheim, Alberta on Highway 38 - the Polish name of the city of Yaroslav, now in Jarosław County, Poland.[14]
    Kolomea, Alberta and the Kolomea School District No. 1507,[15] both southeast of Mundare, Alberta - phonetic spelling of Kolomyia, Kolomyia Raion, Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast.
    Lanuke, Alberta,[16] south of Two Hills off Highway 36 - possibly after a local family.
    Luzan, Alberta,[17] southwest of Andrew - after Luzhany, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Mazeppa, Alberta, northeast of High River and northwest of Blackie - the historical English spelling of the last name of Hetman Ivan Mazepa.
    Myrnam, Alberta, "peace to us"; from the Ukrainian word myr, "peace".[18]
    New Kiew, Alberta and the Kiew School District No. 1693,[19] both north of Lavoy, Alberta off Secondary Highway 631 - German and Polish spelling of the capital city of Ukraine.
    Prosvita, Alberta, "enlightenment"; northeast of Athabasca and west of Grassland - possibly comes from the name of the Prosvita "Enlightenment" societies which started in Galicia in the 1860s.
    Shalka, Alberta,[20] north of Hairy Hill off Secondary Highway 645; after postmaster Matt (Dmytro) Shalka.
    Shandro, Alberta, northeast of Andrew off Secondary Highway 857 near the North Saskatchewan River - after the Shandro family from "Rus'kyi Banyliv", Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).[21]
    Shepenge, Alberta, the Szypenitz School District No. 1470,[22] and the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of St. Mary, Szypentiz; all northwest of Hairy Hill and northeast of Duvernay, Alberta off Secondary Highway 860 - after Shypyntsi, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Shishkovitzi was a locality southwest of Hilliard and southeast of Chipman, Alberta centering on St. Mary's Holy Dormition Russo-Greek Orthodox Catholic Church[23] - named after Shyshkivtsi, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Slawa, Alberta, northeast of Myrnam on the Edmonton-to-Lloydminster branch line of the Canadian Pacific Railway[24] - Polonized spelling of the Ukrainian word "glory" (slava).
    Sniatyn, Alberta and the Sniatyn School District No. 1605,[25] both north of Andrew at the confluence of Limestone and Egg Creeks - after Sniatyn, Sniatyn Raion, Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast. Was originally named Hunka,[26] after a settler in the area from Bukovina, and located further upstream on Limestone Creek.
    Spaca Moskalyk was a locality northwest of Vegreville and northeast of Mundare, Alberta centered on the Transfiguration of Our Lord Ukrainian Catholic Church[27][28] - named after both Spas, Kalush Raion, Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast, and the Moskalyk family who donated part of their farmland for the church.
    Stry, Alberta and the Stry School District No. 2508,[29] both southeast of Vilna and northeast of Hamlin, Alberta - after Stryi, Stryi Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Ukalta, Alberta, north of Wostok off Secondary Highway 855 near the North Saskatchewan River - possibly a combination of "Ukrayina" and "Alberta".
    Wasel, Alberta, west of Hamlin near the North Saskatchewan River on Highway 652[20] - Polonized spelling of the Ukrainian common name "Vasyl".
    Wostok, Alberta, Polonized spelling of the Russian word vostok, "east" - named by Galician Russophile immigrant Theodore (Teodor) Nemirsky.[30]
    Zawale, Alberta and the Zawale School District No. 1074,[31] both south of Wostok, Alberta off Highway 29 - Polonized misspelling of Zavalya, Sniatyn Raion, Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast.
    Rural school districts
    Bavilla School District No. 1477,[32] part of the community of Wasel west of Hamlin, Alberta near the North Saskatchewan River - ?.
    Berhometh School District No. 1499,[33] northeast of Hairy Hill, Alberta - a misspelling of Berehomet, Vyzhnytsia Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Bohdan School District No. 3097,[8] south of Myrnam, Alberta - from the male given name Bohdan ("God-given"); possibly after Hetman Bohdan Khmelnytsky.
    Borowich School District No. 2052,[34] north of Willingdon, Alberta - possibly after a local family.
    Brody School District No. 1782,[35] northeast of Mundare, Alberta - after Brody, Brody Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Bukowina School District No. 1162,[36] northeast of Andrew, Alberta; German/Polish spelling of the Austrian crownland of Bukovina - part of which is now in Chernivtsi Oblast, Ukraine.
    Chernowci School No. 1456,[37] northeast of Wostok, Alberta - Polonized misspelling of the city of Chernivtsi, Ukraine.
    Chornik School District No. 2343,[34] northeast of Musidora, Alberta - possibly after a local family.
    Czahar School District No. 2322,[34][38] southwest of Willingdon, Alberta - Polonized spelling of the village of Chahor; now a part of the city of Chernivtsi, Ukraine.
    Ispas School District No. 2765,[33] southeast of Hamlin and northwest of Duvernay, Alberta on the south side of the North Saskatchewan River - after Ispas, Vyzhnytsia Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Koluz School District No. 1631,[33] east of Chipman, Alberta - a Polonized misspelling of Kalush, Kalush Raion, Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast.
    Kotzman School District No. 2325,[34] northeast of Smoky Lake, Alberta - the German spelling of Kitsman, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Krasnahora School District No. 2613,[8] south of Musidora, Alberta - a Ukrainian phrase meaning "beautiful hill".
    Krasne School District No. 2245,[39] northeast of Lavoy and south of Two Hills, Alberta - the Ukrainian word for "beautiful".
    Kysylew School District No. 1467,[40] northeast of Wostok, Alberta near the Limestone Creek[32] - a Polonized misspelling of Kyseliv, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Leszniw School District No. 2621,[8] south of Morecambe and northeast of Innisfree, Alberta - Polonized spelling of Leshniv, Brody Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Lwiw School District No. 1474,[41] southeast of St. Michael and northeast of Chipman, Alberta on Highway 29 - Polonized spelling of the city of Lviv, Ukraine.
    Luzan School District No. 2113,[34] halfway between Musidora, Alberta and the North Saskatchewan River - after Luzhany, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Miroslowna School District No. 2528,[34] northeast of Innisfree, Alberta - Polonized spelling of the Ukrainian word "miroslavna", meaning "Glorified Peace".
    Molodia School District No. 1486,[42] south of Andrew and north of Mundare, Alberta at the junction of Highway 29 and Secondary Highway 855 - after Molodiia, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Myrnam School District No. 2219, northwest of the modern townsite of Myrnam, Alberta - "peace to us"; from the Ukrainian word myr, "peace".[43]
    Nizir School District No. 2179,[44] east of Two Hills, southeast of Duvernay and northwest of Musidora, Alberta - ?.
    Oleskow School District No. 1612,[45] southeast of Mundare, Alberta and west of Vegreville; after Joseph Oleskiw (1860–1903) - author of the pamphlets "On Free Lands" (Pro Vilni Zemli, spring 1895),[46][47] and "On Emigration" (O emigratsiy, December 1895).[2]
    Paraskevia School District No. 1487,[40] northeast of Hilliard and north of Mundare, Alberta on Secondary Highway 855[48] - possibly after one of the saints named Paraskevi.
    Peremysl School District No. 2944,[8] southeast of Radway, Alberta on the south side of the North Saskatchewan River on Secondary Highway 831 - a phonetic misspelling of the Ukrainian name ("Peremyshl") for Przemyśl, Poland.[14]
    Podola School District No. 2065,[49] south of Hilliard and west of Mundare, Alberta near the Beaverhill Creek - Polonized spelling of the Ukrainian region of Podillia.
    Pobeda School District No. 1604,[33] southeast of Two Hills and west of Morecambe, Alberta - ?.
    Proswita School District No. 1563,[40] northeast of Star and northwest of St. Michael, Alberta off Highway 45[32] - Polonized spelling of the Ukrainian word for "enlightenment"; possibly after the Prosvita Society of Galicia.
    Provischena School District No. 1476,[40] south of Bellis, Alberta near the North Saskatchewan River[32] - possibly after the Ukrainian word for "prophecy" (provishchennya).
    Pruth School Division No. 2064,[34] northwest of Warwick, Alberta - after the Prut river in Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Radymno School District No. 2942,[8] part of the rural community of Leeshore east of Redwater, Alberta on the south side of the North Saskatchewan River - after the town of Radymno, now in Jarosław County, Poland.[14]
    Russia School District No. 2069,[34] south of Musidora, Alberta; from school board confusion over Rusyny / Ruthenian vs. Russki / Russian.
    Ruthenia School District No. 2408,[34] southeast of Smoky Lake and southwest of Bellis, Alberta - after the Austro-Hungarian name for the Ukrainian territories of Galicia, Bukovina, and Carpathian Ruthenia (now Transcarpathian Oblast).
    Shandro School District No. 1438, halfway between Willingdon, Alberta and the North Saskatchewan River - after the Shandro family from "Rus'kyi Banyliv", Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).[50]
    Sheptycki School District No. 2920,[8] southeast of Waskatenau, Alberta on the south side of the North Saskatchewan River - possibly after The Venerable Metropolitan Andrey Sheptytsky (1865–1944).
    Sherentz School District No. 2614,[8] south of Beauvallon and southwest of Myrnam, Alberta - possibly after Shyrivtsi, currently in Dnistrovskyi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Sich School District No. 1595,[51] northeast of Warwick, Alberta - after the fortresses of the Ukrainian Cossacks.
    Skeskowicz School District No. 1801,[34] southwest of Willingdon, Alberta - ?.
    Skowiatyn School District No. 2483,[34] northwest of Wostok, Alberta near the North Saskatchewan River - after Skoviatyn, Borshchiv Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Slawa School District No. 2400,[34] south of the old townsite of Slawa, Alberta - Polonized spelling of the Ukrainian word "glory" (slava).
    Stanislawow School District No. 1485,[40] northeast of Mundare, Alberta[48] - Polish spelling of the town of Stanislaviv, now Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine.
    Svit School District No. 1491,[40] east of Chipman and northeast of Hilliard, Alberta[52] - the Ukrainian word for "the world" or "light".
    Svoboda School District No. 1479,[11] part of the rural community of Skaro northwest of St. Michael, Alberta at the junction of Highway 45 and Secondary Highway 831 - the Ukrainian word for "liberty".
    Toporoutz School District No. 1935,[44] east of Warspite and southwest of Smoky Lake, Alberta - German spelling of Toporivtsi, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Ukraina School District No. 1672,[33] southeast of Hilliard and southwest of Mundare, Alberta - phonetic spelling of "Ukraine" in the Ukrainian language.
    Uhryn School District No. 2409,[34] southeast of Beauvallon and southwest of Myrnam, Alberta - possibly after one of nine places named "Uhryniv"[53] in Galicia.
    Vladymir School District No. 1217,[54] northwest of Mundare, Alberta - after district pioneer Vladymir Svarich (Volodymyr Zvarych).
    Wolie School District No. 2591,[8] west of Warwick, Alberta on the south shore of Bens Lake - Polonized misspelling of the Ukrainian word "freedom" (volya).
    Zaporoze School District No. 2246,[55] northeast of Lavoy, Alberta - a phonetic spelling of "Zaporizhzhia"; after the Zaporizhian Host of Ukrainian Cossacks.
    Zhoda School District No. 1498,[33] southeast of Willingdon and west of Hairy Hill, Alberta - the Ukrainian word for "harmony".
    Zora School District No. 2487,[34] northwest of the modern townsite of Slawa, Alberta - possibly a misspelling of the Ukrainian word for "dawn" (zoria).

    Manitoba
    Rural communities
    Chortitz, Manitoba, south of Winkler off Highway 32; German spelling of Khortytsia island, located in the Dnipro river now within the city of Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine - Manitoba hamlet named by "Russian" Mennonite immigrants.
    Dneiper, Manitoba[56] (renamed "Fishing River"), east of Ukraina and northeast of Sifton - after the Dnipro river.
    Halicz, Manitoba,[57] northwest of Trembowla and north of Ashville near Highway 10 - a Polonized spelling of Halych, a historic Ukrainian city in Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast.
    Horod, Manitoba, north of Elphinstone on Provincial Road 354, near the south boundary of Riding Mountain National Park - the Ukrainian word for "city".
    Jaroslaw, Manitoba, southwest of Hnausa; the Polish name of the city of Yaroslav, now in Jarosław County, Poland.[14]
    Komarno, Manitoba, the Ukrainian word for "mosquito" - possibly after Komarno, Horodok Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Kulish, Manitoba, northwest of Ethelbert; after Panteleimon Kulish (1819–1897).
    Medika, Manitoba, north of Hadashville on Provincial Road 507 - after Medyka on the present Polish-Ukrainian border.[14]
    Melnice, Manitoba, west of Dunnottar and southwest of Winnipeg Beach, at the junction of Highway 8 and Provincial Road 225 - the Ukrainian word for "windmill".[58]
    Morweena, Manitoba, northwest of Arborg and southeast of Fisher Branch on Provincial Road 329 - ?.
    Okno, Manitoba, northwest of Riverton near Shorncliffe - the Ukrainian word for "window".
    Oleskiw, Manitoba,[59] west of Stuartburn on Provincial Road 201; after Dr. Joseph Oleskiw (1860–1903) - author of the pamphlets "On Free Lands" (Pro Vilni Zemli, spring 1895),[46][47] and "On Emigration" (O emigratsiy, December 1895).[2]
    Olha, Manitoba,[59] east of Rossburn and north of Oakburn on Provincial Road 577; from female given name Olha (c.f. Russian "Olga") - possibly after Princess Olha (c. 890–969).
    Ozerna, Manitoba, southeast of Erickson and northeast of Newdale - literally "lake district".
    Petlura, Manitoba, at the junction of Provincial Road 366 and Provincial Road 584 near the north boundary of Riding Mountain National Park - after Ukrainian independence leader Symon Petliura (1879–1926).
    Prawda, Manitoba, southeast of Hadashville on the eastbound lanes of the Trans-Canada Highway; a Polonized spelling of the Ukrainian (and Russian) word pravda, "truth".
    Ruthenia, Manitoba, northeast of Angusville and north of the Waywayseecappo townsite on Provincial Road 264, near the south boundary of Riding Mountain National Park - after the Austro-Hungarian name for the Ukrainian territories of Galicia, Bukovina, and Carpathian Ruthenia (now Transcarpathian Oblast).
    Seech, Manitoba, east of Olha and northwest of Elphinstone, near the south boundary of Riding Mountain National Park - a phonetic misspelling of the Ukrainian word "sich"; after the fortresses of the Ukrainian Cossacks.
    Senkiw, Manitoba, northwest of Roseau River and southwest of Rosa - possibly after a local family.
    Sirko, Manitoba,[60] south of Sundown near the Minnesota border - possibly after the Ukrainian Cossack leader Ivan Sirko (c. 1610–1680).
    Szewczenko, Manitoba (renamed "Vita"), west of Stuartburn on Provincial Road 201; a Polonized spelling of Taras Shevchenko's last name.
    Trembowla, Manitoba, northwest of Dauphin on Provincial Road 491; the Polish spelling of Terebovlia, Terebovlya Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Ukraina, Manitoba,[61] southeast of Ethelbert and northwest of Sifton on Provincial Road 273; a phonetic spelling of "Ukraine" in the Ukrainian language.
    Vidir, Manitoba, northwest of Arborg on Provincial Road 233 - ?.
    Zbaraz, Manitoba, southeast of Fisher Branch and northwest of Arborg on Provincial Road 329 - a phonetic spelling of Zbarazh, Zbarazh Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Zelana, Manitoba, northeast of Ukraina and east of Ethelbert on Provincial Road 269 - a misspelling of the Ukrainian word for "green" (zelena).
    Zelena, Manitoba, northeast of Makaroff and west of the junction of Provincial Road 594 and Highway 83 - the Ukrainian word for "green".
    Zhoda, Manitoba, north of Vita and southeast of Steinbach on Highway 12; the Ukrainian word for "harmony".
    Zoria, Manitoba,[62] east of Sifton off Highway 10 - the Ukrainian word for "dawn".


    Saskatchewan
    "Krassna" was a parish of German Roman Catholics[63] south of Leader, Saskatchewan - German spelling of Krasne, Izmail Raion, Odesa Oblast.
    St. Volodymyr Ukrainian Park, Saskatchewan, a campground owned by the Saskatoon branch of the Ukrainian Catholic Brotherhood of Canada; featuring a small Ukrainian Catholic church dedicated to St. Volodymyr.
    Places in Regina
    Schools
    Elsie Mironuck Community School in Regina, a public elementary school.
    W. S. Hawrylak School in Regina, a public elementary school.
    Places in Saskatoon
    Schools
    Bishop Filevich Ukrainian Bilingual School in Saskatoon, a Catholic separate school specializing in the study of the Ukrainian language, history and culture.
    Bishop Roborecki School in Saskatoon, a Catholic separate school named after Bishop Andriy Roboretsky, the first leader of the Ukrainian Catholic Eparchy of Saskatoon.
    St. Petro Mohyla Institute, Saskatoon, a private college for the study of the Ukrainian language, history and culture - after St. Petro Mohyla.
    St. Volodymyr School in Saskatoon, a Catholic separate school named after St. Volodymyr the Great.
    Rural communities
    Adamiwka School District No. 1994 and the Ukrainian Catholic Church of the Descent of the Holy Ghost, Adamiwka;[64] both southeast of Rosthern, Saskatchewan - after "Adamivka",[65] now in Jarosław County, Poland.[14]
    Antoniwka was a locality north of Canora, Saskatchewan centered on the Ukrainian Catholic parish of the Assumption; named after Antonivka, Chortkiv Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    "Belyk's" was a locality north of Borden, Saskatchewan centered on the "Ivan Franko National Home" - built on Yurko Belyk's farmland[66] - and the Redberry Park rural post office; also the location of the Assumption of St. Mary Ukrainian Orthodox church.
    Beresina, Saskatchewan, northeast of Churchbridge; German spelling of "Berezyna" (now Rozdil[67] in Mykolaiv Raion), Lviv Oblast - Saskatchewan post office named by ethnic Germans from Galicia.
    Bobulynci was a locality southwest of Rose Valley, Saskatchewan centered on the Ukrainian Catholic parish of The Transfiguration - named after Bobulyntsi, Buchach Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Bodnari (or "Kolo Bodnariv") was a locality northeast of Vonda, Saskatchewan named after Teodor Bodnar,[66] who donated part of his farmland to the Ukrainian Catholic parish of Saints Peter and Paul for a church.
    Buchach was a locality near Hazel Dell, Saskatchewan centered on the Ukrainian Catholic Church of the Patronage of the Blessed Virgin Mary; named after Buchach, Buchach Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Bukowina, Saskatchewan, south of Yellow Creek; German/Polish spelling of the Austrian crownland of Bukovina - part of which is now in Chernivtsi Oblast, Ukraine. Named by Bukovinian immigrant and postmaster John (Ivan) Fessiuk.[68]
    Byrtnyky was a locality between Kelvington and Endeavour, Saskatchewan named after one of three places named "Byrtnyky"[69] in Lviv Oblast.
    Chorney Beach, Saskatchewan, a resort beach at Fishing Lake southeast of Wadena; possibly after a local family.
    Chortitz, Saskatchewan, south of Swift Current on Highway 379; German spelling of Khortytsia island, located in the Dnipro river now within the city of Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine - Saskatchewan hamlet named by "Russian" Mennonite immigrants.
    Dmytruk Lake, north of Cree Lake; after Peter Dmytruk of Wynyard, Saskatchewan (aka "Pierre le Canadien"), a member of the Royal Canadian Air Force who served with the French Resistance after being shot down near Paris in 1943.[70]
    Dneiper, Saskatchewan, north of Rhein, after the Dnipro river.
    Dneister, Saskatchewan (renamed "Hamton"),[71] northeast of Rhein on Highway 650; after the Dniester river.
    Dobrowody, Saskatchewan and the Dobrowody School District No. 2637, both northeast of Rama, Saskatchewan - a Ukrainian phrase meaning "good water"; after a village of the same name ("Dobrovody")[72] in Pidhaitsi Raion, Ternopil Oblast, Ukraine.
    Drobot, Saskatchewan, north of Theodore, after Thomas Drobot - postmaster from 1909 to 1917.
    Halyary, Saskatchewan, southwest of Preeceville - a Postmaster General/Government of Canada misspelling of "Halychy".[73]
    Halycry School District No. 2835, also southwest of Preeceville, Saskatchewan - a Department of Education misspelling of "Halychy".[73]
    Havryliuky was a locality south of Prud'homme, Saskatchewan named after Nicholas Hawryluk (Nykola Havryliuk),[66] who donated part of his farmland for Sacred Heart of Jesus Ukrainian Catholic Church.
    Hryhoriw School District No. 2390 and the Ukrainian Catholic parish of St. Demetrius, Hryhoriw; both south of Preeceville, Saskatchewan - after Hryhoriv, Buchach Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Hory (also called Carpenter-Hory) was a locality southwest of Wakaw, Saskatchewan centering on the Ukrainian Catholic parish of The Ascension of Our Lord Jesus Christ - after the Ukrainian word for "mountains" ("hori").
    Janow School District No. 2842 and Janow Corners, Saskatchewan, both south of Meath Park; after a village called "Yaniv" (now Ivano-Frankove),[74] in Yavoriv Raion, Lviv Oblast, Ukraine.
    Kalyna, Saskatchewan, and the Kalyna School District No. 3945, both south of Meath Park, Saskatchewan - after the Ukrainian word for the "highbush cranberry".
    Kiev was a locality southwest of Rose Valley, Saskatchewan centered on a Ukrainian Orthodox Church; named after the capital city of Ukraine.
    Kobzar School District No. 3597 and the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the Holy Ascension, Arran-Kobzar; both south of Arran, Saskatchewan - after the book of poems by Taras Shevchenko.
    Kolo Pidskal'noho (or "Pidskalny's") was a locality west of Cudworth, Saskatchewan named after Ivan Pidskalny,[75] who donated part of his farmland to the Ukrainian Catholic parish of St. Demetrius for a church.
    Kolo Solomyanoho was a locality west of Cudworth, Saskatchewan named after Ivan Solomyany,[75] who donated part of his farmland for the (unspecified) Ukrainian Church of the Holy Transfiguration.
    Kowalowka School District No. 1739 and the Ukrainian Catholic Church of The Transfiguration, Kovalivka; both northeast of Canora, Saskatchewan - after Kovalivka, Buchach Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Krasne, Saskatchewan, west of Wishart, the Ukrainian word for "beautiful"; after a village in Pidvolochysk Raion,[72] Ternopil Oblast, Ukraine.
    Krydor, Saskatchewan, after Peter (Petro) Krysak and Teodor Lucyk, local settlers.
    Krim was a locality south of Aberdeen, Saskatchewan and is the German spelling of the Crimean peninsula - named by "Russian" Mennonites from the Taurida Governorate of the Russian Empire, now Ukraine.
    Kulykiv was a locality north of Invermay, Saskatchewan named after Kulykiv, Zhovkva Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Kvitka, Saskatchewan, south of Jedburgh, after Gregory (Hryhory) Kvitka (1778–1843), Ukrainian novelist.
    Kyziv-Tiaziv, Saskatchewan, south of Rama, after Tiaziv, Tysmenytsia Raion, Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast.[76][77]
    Laniwci, Saskatchewan, and the Laniwci School District No. 2300, both west of Alvena, Saskatchewan - Polonized spelling of Lanivtsi, Borshchiv Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Lemberg, Saskatchewan, German name for Lviv, Ukraine - Saskatchewan town named by ethnic Germans from Galicia.
    Leskiw Lake, southwest of Creighton, Saskatchewan; after Anthony Leskiw of Saskatoon, "lost at sea in October 1940 while serving aboard SS Whitford Point, torpedoed in the north Atlantic by a German submarine".[75]
    Malonek, Saskatchewan, and the Malonek School District No. 3669, both northeast of Pelly, Saskatchewan; perhaps after "Malynivka"[78] - now Malinówka, Brzozów County, Poland.[14]
    New Yaroslau, the name of a Ukrainian block settlement northeast of Yorkton, Saskatchewan; after the ancient city of Yaroslav - now in Jarosław County, Poland.[14]
    Odessa, Saskatchewan, after the city of Odesa, Ukraine - Saskatchewan village named by ethnic Germans from the neighbouring Bessarabia Governorate of the Russian Empire, which is today split between Moldova and Ukraine.
    Orolow, Saskatchewan (also called "Teshliuk's"),[69] south of Krydor - Polonized misspelling of Ordiv, Radekhiv Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Paniowce, Saskatchewan (renamed "Swan Plain"[79]), north of Norquay on Highway 8 - Polonized misspelling of Panivtsi Zelene, Borshchiv Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Rak, Saskatchewan, northeast of Vonda on Highway 41 - after Joseph Rak[66] from Lanivtsi, Borshchiv Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Rebryna was a locality northeast of Hafford, Saskatchewan centered on the "Redberry Ivan Franko Library and Hall", named after Paul (Pavlo) Rebryna.[66]
    Sich School District No. 3454, the Sich community hall and the Ukrainian Catholic parish of St. Michael, "Krydor Sich"; all west of Blaine Lake, Saskatchewan - after the fortresses of the Ukrainian Cossacks.
    Sokal, Saskatchewan, and the Sokal School District No. 1955, both west of Wakaw, Saskatchewan - named after Sokal, Sokal Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Stanislavtsi was a locality south of Foam Lake, Saskatchewan named after Stanislaviv (now Ivano-Frankivsk), Ukraine; also the location of the "Michael Hrushewski" community hall.
    Tarnopol, Saskatchewan, Polonized spelling of Ternopil, Ternopil Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Vasyliv (or "Kolo Vasyleva") was a locality south of Buchanan, Saskatchewan centered on the Ukrainian Catholic parish of Saints Constantine and Helena; named after "N. Wasyliw".[75]
    Vorobceve was a locality just west of Krydor, Saskatchewan centered on the Ukrainian Catholic Church of St. Demetrius; named after the Worobetz family.[80]
    Walawa, Saskatchewan, west of Theodore; Polonized spelling of "Valiava" - now in Przemyśl County, Poland.[14]
    Welechko (or "Bilya Velychka") was a locality south of Hafford, Saskatchewan, named after Ivan Welechko[66] - who donated part of his farmland to the Ukrainian Catholic parish of The Presentation for a church; also the location of the "Taras Shewchenko" community hall.
    Whitkow, Saskatchewan, west of Mayfair on Highway 378, is an Anglo-Polonized spelling[81] of Vytkiv, Radekhiv Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Rural school districts
    Bereziw School District No. 3030 (changed to "Slawa School"),[78] south of Hafford, Saskatchewan; after the district (povit) of "Bereziv" - now Brzozów County, Poland.[14]
    Bogucz School District No. 1743, southeast of Canora, Saskatchewan; possibly after "Bohusa" - now Bogusza,[78] Nowy Sącz County, Poland.[14]
    Bohdan School District No. 3511, east of Mayfair, Saskatchewan; from the male given name Bohdan ("God-given") - possibly after Bohdan Khmelnytsky.
    Bridok School District No. 1765, south of Canora, Saskatchewan, after Bridok, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Bukowina School District No. 2012, southeast of Wakaw, Saskatchewan; German/Polish spelling of the Austrian crownland of Bukovina - part of which is now in Chernivtsi Oblast, Ukraine.
    Cheremosz School District No. 4004, north of Endeavour, Saskatchewan, after the Cheremosh river that separated Galicia and Bukovina.
    Crimea School District No. 4195, southwest of Eatonia, Saskatchewan, after the peninsula in the Black Sea - School named by ethnic Germans from the Taurida Governorate of the Russian Empire, now Ukraine.
    Czernawka School District No. 1712, north of MacNutt, Saskatchewan; Polonized misspelling of "Cherniavka" - now Czerniawka,[78] in Jarosław County, Poland.[14]
    Dnister School District No. 1635, southwest of Canora, Saskatchewan, after the Dniester river.
    Dobraniwka School District No. 2608, southeast of Rosthern, Saskatchewan; a Polonized variation of the Ukrainian phrase for "extremely good"[82] ("dobraniv").
    Drahomanow School District No. 2501, southeast of Prud'homme, Saskatchewan, after Mykhailo Drahomanov (1841–1895).
    Fedoruk School District No. 2342, southwest of Veregin, Saskatchewan, after school trustee Nicoli (Mykola) Fedoruk.[83]
    Fosti School District No. 1700, south of Sheho, Saskatchewan, after school board treasurer John (Ivan) Fosti.[84]
    Franko School District No. 1740, east of Canora, Saskatchewan, after Ivan Franko (1856–1916).
    Halicz School District No. 3204, northwest of Wishart, Saskatchewan; Polonized spelling of the historic Ukrainian city in Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast - named by a "Mr. Bodnarchuk".[85]
    Horodenka School District No. 1845, west of Wakaw, Saskatchewan, after Horodenka, Kolomyia Raion, Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast.
    Horosziwci School District No. 2433 (renamed "War End School"),[78] west of Theodore, Saskatchewan; possibly after "Horokhivtsi" - now in Przemyśl County, Poland.[14]
    Husiatyn School District No. 791 (renamed "Claytonville School"),[86] south of Meath Park, Saskatchewan, after Husiatyn, Husiatyn Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Jablonow School District No. 1672 (renamed "Wroxton School")[87] at Wroxton, Saskatchewan - Polonized spelling of Yabloniv, Kolomyia Raion, Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast.
    Jarema School District No. 1731, north of Calder, Saskatchewan, possibly after the town of Yaremche[87] in Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast.
    Kaminka School District No. 1632 at Tway, Saskatchewan, after "Kaminka"/Kamianka-Buzka, Kamianka-Buzka Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Kiev School District No. 1728 (originally "Kyjiw"), north of Alvena, Saskatchewan - after the capital city of Ukraine.
    Kitzman Scholl District No. 2400, northeast of Rhein, Saskatchewan, after Kitsman, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Kolomyia School District No. 1878, west of Wakaw, Saskatchewan, after Kolomyia, Kolomyia Raion, Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast.
    Krasne School District No. 3058, south of Hafford, Saskatchewan - the Ukrainian word for "beautiful".
    Krasny School District No. 1121, southwest of Sheho, Saskatchewan - also after the Ukrainian word for "beautiful".
    Larisa School District No. 5186, west of Wishart, Saskatchewan, after Larysa Kosach-Kvitka (Lesia Ukrainka, 1871–1913).
    Lodi School District No. 3509, north of Okla, Saskatchewan, the Ukrainian word for "ice".
    Luzan School District No. 255, south of Veregin, Saskatchewan, after Luzhany, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Lysenko School District No. 494, at Insinger, Saskatchewan, after Mykola Lysenko (1842–1912).
    Mazeppa School District No. 2860, southeast of Canora, Saskatchewan, after Hetman Ivan Mazepa.
    Monastyr School District No. 2328, north of Buchanan, Saskatchewan, after Monastyryska, Monastyryska Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Mostetz School District No. 1734, northwest of Calder, Saskatchewan, Germanic spelling[88] of "Mostyshche"/Mostyska, Mostyska Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Nauka School District No. 3059, south of Hafford, Saskatchewan - the Ukrainian word for "learning".
    Nichlava School District No. 1877 (formerly "Heuboden School"),[89] southeast of Rosthern, Saskatchewan, after the Nichlava river in Ternopil Oblast.
    Odessa School District No. 2327, south of Tramping Lake, Saskatchewan; after the city of Odesa, Ukraine - School named by ethnic Germans from the neighbouring Bessarabia Governorate of the Russian Empire, which is today split between Moldova and Ukraine.
    Oleskow School District No. 540, north of Rhein, Saskatchewan, after Joseph Oleskiw (1860–1903) - author of the pamphlets "On Free Lands" (Pro Vilni Zemli, spring 1895),[46][47] and "On Emigration" (O emigratsiy, December 1895).[2]
    Orolow School District No. 2392, south of Krydor, Saskatchewan - a Department of Education misspelling of Ordiv, Radekhiv Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Osin School District No. 3598, north of Arran, Saskatchewan, the Ukrainian word for "autumn".
    Oukraina School District No. 2402, west of Krydor, Saskatchewan - a Department of Education phonetic spelling of Ukrayina (Ukraine).
    Ozeriany School District No. 2722 (renamed "Carpathian School"), south of Cudworth, Saskatchewan - the Ukrainian word for "from the lake"; after one of four places named "Ozeriany"[90] in Galicia.
    Paniowce School District No. 291 (renamed "Swan Plain School"),[79] north of Norquay, Saskatchewan on Highway 8 - Polonized misspelling of Panivtsi Zelene, Borshchiv Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Paseika School District No. 2419, south of Arran, Saskatchewan - a Department of Education phonetic spelling of "pasika"; a Ukrainian word for "beehive" or "apiary".
    Podole School District No. 3227, northeast of Prince Albert, Saskatchewan - the Polish spelling of the Ukrainian region of Podillia.
    Podolia School District No. 2384, northeast of Arran, Saskatchewan - a misspelling of the Ukrainian region of Podillia.
    Pohorlowtz School District No. 2578, southwest of Sheho, Saskatchewan - Germanic misspelling[74] of Pohoril'tsi, Peremyshliany Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Poltawa School District No. 2335 (renamed "Carpenter School"),[91] northeast of Cudworth, Saskatchewan; Polonized spelling of the city of Poltava, Ukraine - probably after the famous battle in 1709.
    Probizna School District No. 1724 (renamed "Geddes School"),[86] northeast of Wroxton, Saskatchewan, after Probizhna, Chortkiv Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Prosvita School District No. 3457, west of Mayfair, Saskatchewan, after the Prosvita Society in Galicia.
    Radimno School District No. 2682, southeast of Willowbrook, Saskatchewan; after the town of Radymno, now in Jarosław County, Poland.[14]
    Rak School District No. 3244, northeast of Vonda, Saskatchewan on Highway 41 - after Joseph Rak[66] from Lanivtsi, Borshchiv Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Rus School District No. 2584, south of Hafford, Saskatchewan, after Kievan Rus'.
    Ruthenia School District No. 404, southwest of Cudworth, Saskatchewan; after the Austro-Hungarian name for the Ukrainian territories of Galicia, Bukovina, and Carpathian Ruthenia (now Transcarpathian Oblast).
    Sambor School District No. 4057, northeast of Dysart, Saskatchewan; Polonized spelling of Sambir, Sambir Raion, Lviv Oblast - School named by ethnic Germans from Galicia.
    Scalat School District No. 1623, southeast of Canora, Saskatchewan - misspelling of Skalat, Pidvolochysk Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Siczynski School District No. 2513, near Meacham, Saskatchewan - Polonized spelling of the last name of Ukrainian composer and conductor Denys Sichynsky (1865–1909).[92]
    Skala School District No. 2712, west of Cudworth, Saskatchewan - after Skala-Podilska, Borshchiv Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Slawa School District No. 3030 (formerly "Bereziw School"),[78] south of Hafford, Saskatchewan - Polonized spelling of the Ukrainian word "glory" (slava).
    Sniatyn School District No. 1729, west of Wakaw, Saskatchewan, after Sniatyn, Sniatyn Raion, Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast.
    Stanisloff School District No. 3105, south of Foam Lake, Saskatchewan - a Department of Education phonetic misspelling of "Stanislav", after Stanislaviv (now Ivano-Frankivsk), Ukraine.
    Stawchan School District No. 1826, north of Rhein, Saskatchewan - a Polonized misspelling of Stavchany, Horodok Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Stryj School District No. 3201, north of Goodeve, Saskatchewan - German/Polish spelling of Stryi, Stryi Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Svoboda School District No. 1704, northwest of Alvena, Saskatchewan - the Ukrainian word for "liberty".
    Taras School District No. 4880, north of Gronlid, Saskatchewan, after Taras Shevchenko.
    Toporoutz School District No. 1666 (renamed "Chaucer School"),[68] north of Calder, Saskatchewan - German spelling of Toporivtsi, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Torsk School District No. 1713, east of Calder, Saskatchewan - after Torske, Zalishchyky Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Vasloutz School District No. 2642, south of Buchanan, Saskatchewan - Germanic misspelling of Vasylkivtsi,[79] Husiatyn Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Verenczanka School District No. 264 (renamed "New Canadian School"),[68] east of Rhein, Saskatchewan - Polonized spelling of Verenchanka, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Vesna School District No. 736, southeast of Arran, Saskatchewan, the Ukrainian word for "spring (season)".
    Verbowska School District No. 1737, north of MacNutt, Saskatchewan; a Polonized misspelling of Verbivka, Borshchiv Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Vladimir School District No. 2193, west of Alvena, Saskatchewan, after St. Volodymyr the Great.
    Wasileff School District No. 1692 (renamed "Yemen School"),[68] west of Insinger, Saskatchewan - an Anglo-Polonized spelling of Vasyliv, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Whitkow School District No. 4508 and Whitkow Hamlet School District No. 5118, both west of Mayfair, Saskatchewan on Highway 378; an Anglo-Polonized spelling[81] of Vytkiv, Radekhiv Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Wisnia School District No. 2870, southeast of Veregin, Saskatchewan - Polonized misspelling of the Vyshnia river in Lviv Oblast.
    Wolia School District No. 3503, southwest of Glaslyn, Saskatchewan - Polonized spelling of the Ukrainian word "freedom" (volya).
    Wolna School District No. 3503, east of Rama, Saskatchewan - Polonized spelling of the Ukrainian word "free" (vilna).
    Wysla School District No. 4106, southwest of Canora, Saskatchewan - Polonized misspelling of the Ukrainian word (Vysla) for the Vistula river.
    Zamok School District No. 784, south of Meath Park, Saskatchewan, after Zamok, Zhovkva Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Zaporoze School District No. 3188, west of Krydor, Saskatchewan - a Department of Education phonetic spelling of "Zaporizhzhia";[93] after the Zaporizhian Host of Ukrainian Cossacks.
    Zayacz School District No. 3416 (renamed "Liberal School"), north of Calder, Saskatchewan, after school trustee "A. Zayacz"[94] (Zayach?).
    Zazula School District No. 4526, northwest of Hendon, Saskatchewan, after district pioneer Fred Zazula.[75]
    Zbaraz School District No. 2403, south of Krydor, Saskatchewan, a misspelling of Zbarazh, Zbarazh Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Zhoda School District No. 2377, south of Mikado, Saskatchewan, the Ukrainian word for "harmony".
    Zoria School District No. 3471, west of Mayfair, Saskatchewan, the Ukrainian word for "dawn".

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Mr. Hack, @Gerard1234

    Geraldina shows again that he (she?) is an intellectual lightweight that should limit his activities towards weeding his garden and playing chopsticks on the piano. As his sexual orientation has long been under suspicion, he should be rather easy for Karlin to recruit into his new “internationalist coalition”. 🙂

  866. @sudden death
    @Mikel

    Allowed active public war criticism/reporting in RF media is about that how RF forces are bad at killing Ukrainians efficiently, those who are against invasions in and killings of neighbouring people in principle, no matter how succesfully it could be done, are thrown in jail with multiple years sentences.

    There is plenty of intra-UA war efficiency criticism of such type going in Kiev too, you're either not following it or unfamiliar with them (eg. Yuri Kasjanov, Yuri Biriukov, Yuri Butusov et al), all of them are very critical Zelensky or regarding everyday military inner UA matters and problems.

    Replies: @sudden death, @Mikel

    those who are against invasions in and killings of neighbouring people in principle, no matter how succesfully it could be done, are thrown in jail with multiple years sentences.

    You are surely much more familiar with the Russian and Ukrainian media landscape than me and have the advantage of speaking Russian but I think you are clearly exaggerating. That famous reporter who criticized the war live on TV at the beginning wasn’t imprisoned. If my memory doesn’t fail, she was let go with a fine (not dissimilar to what would happen in many Western countries under a war scenario). And that girl from St Petersburg who was arrested for participating in anti-war protests was later equally free to continue her political activities and actually hand over a lethal bomb to a pro-war activist.

    Thanks for the information about Ukrainian journalists critical of the authorities. I’ll check them out for sure. But I find the idea that in Russia people are free to criticize the Kremlin just as long as they are more extremist than the Kremlin itself more than questionable. There has just been a coup attempt and some of the Russian sources I followed during the events (including AK) were clearly sympathetic with the attempt to overthrow the regime, which is by no means surprising considering how viciously they had been attacking the Kremlin. Is there any equivalent of this in Ukraine? Who would be the Ukrainian counterpart of Strelkov (who has just founded an anti-Kremlin political movement at war time)?

    Now, this doesn’t mean that in Russia you cannot be poisoned or suicided and that part of the tolerance of dissent may be just due to low state capacity but from where I stand, I think that what AK once said about Russia having in practical terms more freedom of expression than many modern Western countries looks true.

    Anyway, Zelensky just received Greta in Kiev… What’s next? Dylan Mulvaney? Lia Thomas? A BLM delegation? Is there no depth he’s unwilling to fall to in order to garner the support of all the worst elements of Western societies?

    • Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
    @Mikel


    Is there no depth he’s unwilling to fall to in order to garner the support of all the worst elements of Western societies?
     
    Yes. But nobody wants to know it. G. G. Allin even had his limits.
    , @AP
    @Mikel


    Anyway, Zelensky just received Greta in Kiev
     
    Zelensky is in the fight for Ukraine's existence and you are whining about Greta. Lol.

    Besides, she supports nuclear now so she is growing up and getting smarter:

    https://www.euronews.com/green/2022/10/12/greta-thunberg-on-nuclear-and-why-its-completely-insane-we-arent-talking-about-energy-savi

    Zelensky also welcomed Mike Pence.

    Replies: @A123, @QCIC

  867. @Mikel
    @John Johnson


    they also have a completely controlled state media that tells them how to think. Journalists that question the war end up in prison.
     
    I wonder where people like you (or your splitting images, the Western Putin fans like Anglin and McGregor) come from. Have you ever watched any popular Russian TV debate show subtitled in English, like Soloviov's? Just once? Do you know who Russian war correspondents Rybar and Wargonzo are and how their reporting is regularly used by Western pro-Ukrainian sources to provide objective information on the course of the war?

    Heck, are you even capable of processing the fact that right here we have just been visited by a notorious Moscow blogger who is publicly comparing Putin to a chimpanzee every day and actually promoting treason?

    With all the things one can criticize Putin and his regime for, why invent equivocal ones? And when one is engaged in such inventions, why choose the one that actually applies to the Ukrainians much more than to the Russians? Even on this blog we have the revealing fact that not one single ethnic Ukrainian, as far as I know, found it fit to criticize the Ukrainian government when it was killing its own civilians but we do have a number of Russians who criticized their government from the start of the war.

    Besides, Zelensky has just received Greta Thunberg's visit in Kiev and that's just too much, even for a lifelong pacifist like me. F*ck Kiev and all it stands for today.

    Replies: @Wielgus, @sudden death, @John Johnson

    they also have a completely controlled state media that tells them how to think. Journalists that question the war end up in prison.

    I wonder where people like you (or your splitting images, the Western Putin fans like Anglin and McGregor) come from.

    How would I be a splitting image for pointing out that Russia locks away journalists for criticizing the war? Is that something you deny? It is well documented by human rights organizations.

    Russian journalist gets 6 years in penal colony for speaking out on Ukraine
    https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/2/15/russian-journalist-sentenced-to-penal-colony-in-dissent-crackdown

    Note that the Russian penal colonies are managed by the mob (thieves in law) and tolerate male rape. Can provide sources on that if you would like.

    Have you ever watched any popular Russian TV debate show subtitled in English, like Soloviov’s? Just once?

    Yes I have watched Putin’s Jewish propagandist many times. I would describe his show as a dystopian nightmare. A totalitarian version of Fox ‘n Friends.

    Here he is calling for attacks on London:

    Note that he has a draft dodging male model son in London.
    https://www.newsweek.com/fact-check-putin-allys-son-dodging-draft-modelling-london-1781618

    He also did a show where he told Russian men to go die for their country.

    What is your point exactly? Did you have a question for me?

    • Replies: @Mikel
    @John Johnson


    Yes I have watched Putin’s Jewish propagandist many times.
     
    No, you haven't, and I doubt you had even heard of him before I mentioned his name to you. You're coming back with the well publicized and irrelevant story about his hypocrisy as if my point was about his personal integrity rather than the lively debates even boomer Russians are accustomed to watch, let alone the Telegram generation.

    If you had anything of interest to say, you wouldn't be repeating the silly American boomer trope that Russia is some kind of North Korea with no freedom of speech, as if that was the problem with Russia, of all the many things one could criticize the criminal Kremlin for. More than the splitting image of McGregor, you come across like the splitting image of Alex Jones, who rather than focus on the many winning conservative points like open borders or child sex surgery, focuses his energies on Pizzagates and Sandy Hook nonsense.

    Replies: @John Johnson, @Dmitry, @silviosilver

  868. @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms
    Japan also lost the Russo-Japanese War:

    The First Sino-Japanese War (1894-95) was a major gamble for Japan but they got away with a huge territorial (Taiwan) and monetary ($5 billion 2015 USD) concession from Qing China.

    Russo-Japanese War was again a huge gamble. The Japanese scored a decisive victory over Baltic Fleet at Tsushima, but on land it was really a draw.

    The Russians drove a hard bargain at Treaty of Portsmouth, refused to pay reparations, and denied Japan territorial gains in Liaodong and Sakhalin.

    This infuriated the Japanese populace and led to a decade of internal unrest.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hibiya_incendiary_incident
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Era_of_Popular_Violence

    The Americans would begin encroaching in NE Asia, and until the Revolution Russia and Japan would have a quasi-alliance,

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japan–Russia_Secret_Agreement

    General Nogi Maresuke and his wife Shizuko committed suicide by seppuku shortly after the Emperor Meiji’s funeral in 1912. This was in accordance with the samurai practice of following one’s master to death.

    In his suicide letter, Nogi said that he wished to expiate for the terrible casualties suffered by his troops at Siege of Port Arthur.
     

    https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-188-russia-ukraine/#comment-5349128

    Chinese in general are not resentful about lost territories to Russia. Outer Manchuria is not critical for security of PRC, and it has abided by those borders upon Soviet breakup:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1991_Sino-Soviet_Border_Agreement

    Japanese are actually quite bitter about the Kuriles which is critical for its security -- if PRC annexes Taiwan, Japan would be surrounded by China and Russia on the First Island Chain.

    https://i.postimg.cc/7LjRrkK4/main-qimg-c2bdd9bc26833b3ab95e8a3a7af80b0f-lq.jpg

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @John Johnson

    Japan also lost the Russo-Japanese War:

    It was a draw but the Russians were completely embarrassed by the biggest upset in Naval history:
    https://historyincharts.com/who-won-the-russo-japanese-war/

    The Battle of Tsushima to this day is an embarrassment to the Russian Navy. It led to Japanese arrogance in WW2 and was cited in their attack on Pearl Harbor.

    Another case of a dopey Tsar thinking he can just show up and win. He didn’t bother studying the Japanese Navy and their technological advancements. The British however did their homework and knew he would lose.

    Nicholas II didn’t even learn from his mistakes. He did the same thing in WW1.

    A war dunce just like Putin.

    Then he lost his guts for war when the country needed him the most.

  869. @Mikel
    @sudden death


    those who are against invasions in and killings of neighbouring people in principle, no matter how succesfully it could be done, are thrown in jail with multiple years sentences.
     
    You are surely much more familiar with the Russian and Ukrainian media landscape than me and have the advantage of speaking Russian but I think you are clearly exaggerating. That famous reporter who criticized the war live on TV at the beginning wasn't imprisoned. If my memory doesn't fail, she was let go with a fine (not dissimilar to what would happen in many Western countries under a war scenario). And that girl from St Petersburg who was arrested for participating in anti-war protests was later equally free to continue her political activities and actually hand over a lethal bomb to a pro-war activist.

    Thanks for the information about Ukrainian journalists critical of the authorities. I'll check them out for sure. But I find the idea that in Russia people are free to criticize the Kremlin just as long as they are more extremist than the Kremlin itself more than questionable. There has just been a coup attempt and some of the Russian sources I followed during the events (including AK) were clearly sympathetic with the attempt to overthrow the regime, which is by no means surprising considering how viciously they had been attacking the Kremlin. Is there any equivalent of this in Ukraine? Who would be the Ukrainian counterpart of Strelkov (who has just founded an anti-Kremlin political movement at war time)?

    Now, this doesn't mean that in Russia you cannot be poisoned or suicided and that part of the tolerance of dissent may be just due to low state capacity but from where I stand, I think that what AK once said about Russia having in practical terms more freedom of expression than many modern Western countries looks true.

    Anyway, Zelensky just received Greta in Kiev... What's next? Dylan Mulvaney? Lia Thomas? A BLM delegation? Is there no depth he's unwilling to fall to in order to garner the support of all the worst elements of Western societies?

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @AP

    Is there no depth he’s unwilling to fall to in order to garner the support of all the worst elements of Western societies?

    Yes. But nobody wants to know it. G. G. Allin even had his limits.

    • Agree: Mikel
  870. @John Johnson
    @Mikel


    they also have a completely controlled state media that tells them how to think. Journalists that question the war end up in prison.
     
    I wonder where people like you (or your splitting images, the Western Putin fans like Anglin and McGregor) come from.

    How would I be a splitting image for pointing out that Russia locks away journalists for criticizing the war? Is that something you deny? It is well documented by human rights organizations.

    Russian journalist gets 6 years in penal colony for speaking out on Ukraine
    https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/2/15/russian-journalist-sentenced-to-penal-colony-in-dissent-crackdown

    Note that the Russian penal colonies are managed by the mob (thieves in law) and tolerate male rape. Can provide sources on that if you would like.

    Have you ever watched any popular Russian TV debate show subtitled in English, like Soloviov’s? Just once?

    Yes I have watched Putin's Jewish propagandist many times. I would describe his show as a dystopian nightmare. A totalitarian version of Fox 'n Friends.

    Here he is calling for attacks on London:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nV5yIvqDaKI

    Note that he has a draft dodging male model son in London.
    https://www.newsweek.com/fact-check-putin-allys-son-dodging-draft-modelling-london-1781618

    He also did a show where he told Russian men to go die for their country.

    What is your point exactly? Did you have a question for me?

    Replies: @Mikel

    Yes I have watched Putin’s Jewish propagandist many times.

    No, you haven’t, and I doubt you had even heard of him before I mentioned his name to you. You’re coming back with the well publicized and irrelevant story about his hypocrisy as if my point was about his personal integrity rather than the lively debates even boomer Russians are accustomed to watch, let alone the Telegram generation.

    If you had anything of interest to say, you wouldn’t be repeating the silly American boomer trope that Russia is some kind of North Korea with no freedom of speech, as if that was the problem with Russia, of all the many things one could criticize the criminal Kremlin for. More than the splitting image of McGregor, you come across like the splitting image of Alex Jones, who rather than focus on the many winning conservative points like open borders or child sex surgery, focuses his energies on Pizzagates and Sandy Hook nonsense.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
    @Mikel


    Yes I have watched Putin’s Jewish propagandist many times.
     
    No, you haven’t, and I doubt you had even heard of him before I mentioned his name to you.

    You Putin defenders are terrible at verifying anything. You can't even do a simple search on my history.

    I talked about him last year before anyone else.

    Since you are too lazy/incapable of using a simple search:
    https://www.unz.com/?s=Solovyov&Action=Search&ptype=all&commentsearch=only&commenter=John+Johnson

    If you had anything of interest to say, you wouldn’t be repeating the silly American boomer trope that Russia is some kind of North Korea with no freedom of speech

    I'm not a boomer and Russia's sentences of journalists have been public.

    You should just quit. You're terrible at this compared to the other bootlickers.

    Leave the whoring to MacGregor and Ritter. They aren't very good but they are the best that Team Dwarf has to work with.

    Replies: @Mikel

    , @Dmitry
    @Mikel

    This is the pseudo-open discussion.

    I'm not certain about this question in either direction, but it's possible it's not impossible pseudodemocracy is even more damaging for the general culture and politics, than a more closed discussion e.g. Stalin times.

    If I would copy paste my answer about this a few months ago where I was talking about this with user LatW.

    -


    Life in the country with model of “pseudodemocracy” politics, is probably usually better than in most of the autocracy societies.

    But pseudodemocracy was an experiment of those years 1991-2022 and how was the result for the general culture?

    If you know these toys.

    https://i.imgur.com/3xrxGLJ.jpg

    In pseudodemocracy, the children sit in the toy car or toy boat. The toy car make some kinds of noises and movement, so the child believes they are controlling it.

    Children also add their imagination so they can act like they are controllers. Even though they don’t really believe this. It’s a kind of border between imagination and reality for the children.

    In 1991-2022, after time the children could stop playing. So, the managers of the toys are have incentive for adding more loud noises, more exciting movements to the game.

    In traditional autocracy, they usually put the children in a quiet room and lock the door. It’s the same result, so the children don’t move.

    Is it better for psychology health locked in a room, or sitting in noisy, stimulating version of the toy car, imagining you are moving?

    In both situations, children don’t move. In some ways, you can prefer the calm quiet television in Soviet times. There was still negative effects for the culture. But it was different than the noise and distraction that is required for managing children in the pseudodemocracy.

    I think there are already some of the difference with Belarus. Lukashenko is not from the KGB training. He doesn’t flood the culture so much with decoys and distraction.

    Media in Belarus is relatively more calm, without so many games. It’s possible after 2022, in Russia it is already becoming more like Belarus. For many people, this change feels positively.

    , @silviosilver
    @Mikel


    More than the splitting image of McGregor, you come across like the splitting image of Alex Jones,
     
    It's spitting image, not splitting. But the way you're using it, I think you mean "mirror image." A spitting image means an identical copy. "I know a guy who looks exactly like Rod Stewart - he's a spitting image!" (True story, btw.) A mirror image, when referring to people, means sharing a common quality despite perhaps differing in some ways. "In their harsh totalitarian social policies, the bolsheviks were a mirror image of the nazis."

    Replies: @Mikel

  871. @Wokechoke
    @LatW

    You stated that you wouldn’t mind the erasure of a white Europe as long as the darkies who inherited it would keep speaking Latvian in your particular corner of Europe. Just economics you said.

    Replies: @LatW

    You stated that you wouldn’t mind the erasure of a white Europe as long as the darkies who inherited it would keep speaking Latvian in your particular corner of Europe. Just economics you said.

    I never said anything like that. What I may have said is that it doesn’t matter if a country is in the EU or not, once a country reaches a certain level of GDP per capita, it will have this issue. And that this is a global economic phenomenon.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @LatW

    Yes, people prefer to move to wealthy countries. The challenge for those countries is being selective about whom they allow into their countries.

    , @Wokechoke
    @LatW

    Yes you did.


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0vbXCHMadeA


    SFC

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

  872. @Ivashka the fool
    @Ivashka the fool

    Speaking of hedonism:


    Yesterday, the State Duma adopted a law on the compulsory work of schoolchildren under the argument “we must fight the consumer society” (literal quote from the chairman of the State Duma Committee on Education Olga Kazakova from United Russia).
    But the authorities themselves consume like crazy, and they do not intend to refuse this. In Karachay-Cherkessia, they arrested the Deputy Prime Minister Irina Gerbekova, who was in charge of healthcare and the social sphere in the region. According to investigators, she stole 100 million rubles. from the budget.
    And here's how she used it:
    “The search footage of Ms. Gerbekova’s household in Cherkessk shows a collection of 120 pairs of branded shoes and 70 bags from Louis Vuitton, Armani, Gucci and other famous fashion houses.”
     
    https://t.me/tolk_tolk/16417

    Pynya just has more stolen moneys to spend...

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @QCIC, @Another Polish Perspective

    Yes, and hedonism without imagination…. Just to go to shop and buy all available variations of one article on shelves. Really easy. But boring. So no redeeming qualities, no. Not even fun – so she can’t be a modern Marie Antoinette, no.

    The search footage of Ms. Gerbekova’s household in Cherkessk shows a collection of 120 pairs of branded shoes and 70 bags from Louis Vuitton, Armani, Gucci and other famous fashion houses.

    Clearly the woman is in urgent need of reeducation in Gulag. 2 years, I say…?!

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @Another Polish Perspective

    ⁷Putin supposedly comes from a very modest background in the Ligovo neighborhood in Piter. That might explain his will to get wealthy and influential by any means and his nouveau riche hedonism.

    However, we know that his Tver Karelian grandfather worked as a cook for Lenin in Gorky. This is interesting, because at the time, the ethnic Russian personnel for the Bolshevik elite were supposedly selected from the most radical Old Believer fraction of Netovshhina that have completely rejected the clergy and all the rites. The Netovshhina types were convinced that the Tsarist government was the Antichrist government. These radical sectarian people were supposedly recruited and managed by Krasin, who was the Bolshevik Old Believer liaison probably responsible for killing Savva Morozov, a death that the French government preferred to rule a suicide.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonid_Krasin

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Savva_Morozov

    BTW, although merchants, the Old Believer Morozov family was related to the family of Boyarinya Morozova, the aristocrat who was martyred for her staunchly Old Believer stance.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feodosia_Morozova

    Therefore, the Morozovs retained their wealth and influence despite all the persecutions, until Savva decided to finance the Reds following his mistress requests.

    https://www.rbth.com/history/336239-how-russian-empires-wealthiest-man-sponsored-bolsheviks

    Another example of typically Russian lack of limits.

    Replies: @Another Polish Perspective, @LatW

  873. @Another Polish Perspective
    @Ivashka the fool

    Yes, and hedonism without imagination.... Just to go to shop and buy all available variations of one article on shelves. Really easy. But boring. So no redeeming qualities, no. Not even fun - so she can't be a modern Marie Antoinette, no.


    The search footage of Ms. Gerbekova’s household in Cherkessk shows a collection of 120 pairs of branded shoes and 70 bags from Louis Vuitton, Armani, Gucci and other famous fashion houses.

     

    Clearly the woman is in urgent need of reeducation in Gulag. 2 years, I say...?!

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

    ⁷Putin supposedly comes from a very modest background in the Ligovo neighborhood in Piter. That might explain his will to get wealthy and influential by any means and his nouveau riche hedonism.

    However, we know that his Tver Karelian grandfather worked as a cook for Lenin in Gorky. This is interesting, because at the time, the ethnic Russian personnel for the Bolshevik elite were supposedly selected from the most radical Old Believer fraction of Netovshhina that have completely rejected the clergy and all the rites. The Netovshhina types were convinced that the Tsarist government was the Antichrist government. These radical sectarian people were supposedly recruited and managed by Krasin, who was the Bolshevik Old Believer liaison probably responsible for killing Savva Morozov, a death that the French government preferred to rule a suicide.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonid_Krasin

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Savva_Morozov

    BTW, although merchants, the Old Believer Morozov family was related to the family of Boyarinya Morozova, the aristocrat who was martyred for her staunchly Old Believer stance.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feodosia_Morozova

    Therefore, the Morozovs retained their wealth and influence despite all the persecutions, until Savva decided to finance the Reds following his mistress requests.

    https://www.rbth.com/history/336239-how-russian-empires-wealthiest-man-sponsored-bolsheviks

    Another example of typically Russian lack of limits.

    • Replies: @Another Polish Perspective
    @Ivashka the fool

    These rich Old Believers may have seen Antichrist in tzar, but certainly they weren't following The Old Testament when marrying cousins. It seems they were overall a bit like Protestants/Puritans in the West

    Savva Morozov married his second-cousin's wife Zinaida Grigorievna, née Zimin (Russian: Зинаида Григорьевна Зимина)
     

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Savva_Morozov

    That his family were ostentatious hedonists doesn't speak well about their faith too.


    This Krasin died from "blood disease" which is often a burden of progeny of cousin marriages.


    While Krasin was negotiating formal recognition of the Bolshevik government by the United Kingdom and France, and despite remedies proposed by his old friend, the physician Alexander Bogdanov, he died from a blood disease.
     
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonid_Krasin

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

    , @LatW
    @Ivashka the fool

    re: Old Believer merchants.

    After you recommended the work of the historian Alexander Pyzhikov, I watched an interesting documentary called "The Russian Schism" ("Русский раскол"). This delves deeper into the role of the Old Believer merchants (купечество). Apparently, the best factories in Moscow at the time were owned by the Old Believers and these factory owners sponsored the Bolsheviks. These are not the type of Old Believers that we're used to knowing, but those who were more in tune with the economic and political currents of the time.

    The discussion about the "two civilizations" within one Russia is very eye opening, almost shocking. The two eagles on the coat of arms are a reflection of these two internal civilizations. But it explains some of the contradictions that have always puzzled me.

    Interestingly, they mention two different types of capitalisms that developed in Russia, the one based on exporting resources (what they called the St Pete one and the one that is still dominant today, at the time it was grain, not oil) and the other, the internal Moscow kind, manufacturing that served the internal needs and was led in many cases by Old Believers.

    The second episode goes deeper into their particular role (the first part is more of a general prelude to the struggles of the time). The video features the beautiful grave site of Savva Morozov.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EOD9Yk3Jll4

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JE-S3kXJUzM&t=462s

    Replies: @LatW

  874. Must watch this summer boating footage where a Russian attempts a triple flip
    https://funker530.com/video/nsfw-russian-boat-crew-wiped-by-ukrainian-ambush/

    A nice and sunny day to die for your dictator.

  875. @Mikel
    @John Johnson


    Yes I have watched Putin’s Jewish propagandist many times.
     
    No, you haven't, and I doubt you had even heard of him before I mentioned his name to you. You're coming back with the well publicized and irrelevant story about his hypocrisy as if my point was about his personal integrity rather than the lively debates even boomer Russians are accustomed to watch, let alone the Telegram generation.

    If you had anything of interest to say, you wouldn't be repeating the silly American boomer trope that Russia is some kind of North Korea with no freedom of speech, as if that was the problem with Russia, of all the many things one could criticize the criminal Kremlin for. More than the splitting image of McGregor, you come across like the splitting image of Alex Jones, who rather than focus on the many winning conservative points like open borders or child sex surgery, focuses his energies on Pizzagates and Sandy Hook nonsense.

    Replies: @John Johnson, @Dmitry, @silviosilver

    Yes I have watched Putin’s Jewish propagandist many times.

    No, you haven’t, and I doubt you had even heard of him before I mentioned his name to you.

    You Putin defenders are terrible at verifying anything. You can’t even do a simple search on my history.

    I talked about him last year before anyone else.

    Since you are too lazy/incapable of using a simple search:
    https://www.unz.com/?s=Solovyov&Action=Search&ptype=all&commentsearch=only&commenter=John+Johnson

    If you had anything of interest to say, you wouldn’t be repeating the silly American boomer trope that Russia is some kind of North Korea with no freedom of speech

    I’m not a boomer and Russia’s sentences of journalists have been public.

    You should just quit. You’re terrible at this compared to the other bootlickers.

    Leave the whoring to MacGregor and Ritter. They aren’t very good but they are the best that Team Dwarf has to work with.

    • Replies: @Mikel
    @John Johnson


    You Putin defenders are terrible at verifying anything.
     
    Are you just incapable of using anything but loser arguments? Unlike you, I don't defend any of the two Eastern Slavic warring dwarfs. You just pile on repetitive stuff about one dwarf while kissing the other dwarf's bottom. The one who lies through his teeth in order to get you and your family in a world war.

    Btw, the only two Putin defenders left here are Gerard and Mikhail. All the rest are gone. Are you really posting here your MSM lines in order to win over two commenters?

    Replies: @AP

  876. @AP
    @Gerard1234


    I already mentioned about the lack of ANY Ukrainian place names, like there are in North America for plenty of Russian, Dutch, French, British, even Armenian diasporas.
     
    The list is as long as you record of idiocy. But what can one expect from a semi-retarded Sovok "engineer"?:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Canadian_place_names_of_Ukrainian_origin



    Alberta

    Places in Edmonton
    Neighbourhoods
    Baturyn, Edmonton, after Baturyn, a historic castle town in northeastern Ukraine (Nizhyn Raion, Chernihiv Oblast).
    Oleskiw, Edmonton (formerly Wolf Willow Farms),[1] renamed in 1972 after Joseph Oleskiw (1860–1903), professor, writer and promoter of emigration.[2]
    Ozerna, Edmonton, literally "lake district".[1]
    Pylypow Industrial subdivision, after Ivan Pylypow,[1] early pioneer.[3]
    Parks
    Oleskiw Park,[1] after Joseph Oleskiw (1860–1903), professor, writer and promoter of emigration
    Ukrainian Millennium Park (now Primrose Park), for 1989, the one thousandth anniversary of the Baptism of Kiev (the founding of Christianity in Ukraine).[1]
    William Hawrelak Park, after former Edmonton mayor William Hawrelak.[4]
    Roads
    Eleniak Road, Edmonton, after Wasyl Eleniak,[5] early pioneer.[1]
    Schools
    Bishop Greschuk Catholic Elementary School, an Edmonton Catholic separate school.
    Bishop Savaryn Catholic Elementary School, an Edmonton Catholic separate school named after Bishop Nicholas Savaryn, the first leader of the Ukrainian Catholic Eparchy of Edmonton.
    St. Vladimir Catholic Elementary School, an Edmonton Catholic separate school named after St. Volodymyr the Great.
    Rural communities
    Bellis, Alberta, "white woods"; referring to poplars and birch.[6]
    Borsczow, Alberta,[7] northeast of Ryley on Secondary Highway 626; Polonized spelling of Borshchiv, Borshchiv Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Buchach, Alberta, the Buczacz School District No. 2580,[8] and St. Nicholas Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church (Hlus' Church), Buczacz; halfway between Innisfree and Musidora, Alberta off Secondary Highway 870 - from Buchach, Buchach Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Halych, Alberta (located in Westlock County, east of Tawatinaw[9]), from Halych - the historic city in Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast
    Ispas, Alberta,[10] southeast of Hamlin and northwest of Duvernay, Alberta on the south side of the North Saskatchewan River - after Ispas, Vyzhnytsia Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Jaroslaw School District No. 1478,[11] the Descent of the Holy Spirit Ukrainian Catholic Church, Jaroslaw;[12] and St. Demitrius Ukrainian Orthodox Church, Jaroslaw;[13] all northeast of Bruderheim, Alberta on Highway 38 - the Polish name of the city of Yaroslav, now in Jarosław County, Poland.[14]
    Kolomea, Alberta and the Kolomea School District No. 1507,[15] both southeast of Mundare, Alberta - phonetic spelling of Kolomyia, Kolomyia Raion, Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast.
    Lanuke, Alberta,[16] south of Two Hills off Highway 36 - possibly after a local family.
    Luzan, Alberta,[17] southwest of Andrew - after Luzhany, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Mazeppa, Alberta, northeast of High River and northwest of Blackie - the historical English spelling of the last name of Hetman Ivan Mazepa.
    Myrnam, Alberta, "peace to us"; from the Ukrainian word myr, "peace".[18]
    New Kiew, Alberta and the Kiew School District No. 1693,[19] both north of Lavoy, Alberta off Secondary Highway 631 - German and Polish spelling of the capital city of Ukraine.
    Prosvita, Alberta, "enlightenment"; northeast of Athabasca and west of Grassland - possibly comes from the name of the Prosvita "Enlightenment" societies which started in Galicia in the 1860s.
    Shalka, Alberta,[20] north of Hairy Hill off Secondary Highway 645; after postmaster Matt (Dmytro) Shalka.
    Shandro, Alberta, northeast of Andrew off Secondary Highway 857 near the North Saskatchewan River - after the Shandro family from "Rus'kyi Banyliv", Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).[21]
    Shepenge, Alberta, the Szypenitz School District No. 1470,[22] and the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of St. Mary, Szypentiz; all northwest of Hairy Hill and northeast of Duvernay, Alberta off Secondary Highway 860 - after Shypyntsi, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Shishkovitzi was a locality southwest of Hilliard and southeast of Chipman, Alberta centering on St. Mary's Holy Dormition Russo-Greek Orthodox Catholic Church[23] - named after Shyshkivtsi, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Slawa, Alberta, northeast of Myrnam on the Edmonton-to-Lloydminster branch line of the Canadian Pacific Railway[24] - Polonized spelling of the Ukrainian word "glory" (slava).
    Sniatyn, Alberta and the Sniatyn School District No. 1605,[25] both north of Andrew at the confluence of Limestone and Egg Creeks - after Sniatyn, Sniatyn Raion, Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast. Was originally named Hunka,[26] after a settler in the area from Bukovina, and located further upstream on Limestone Creek.
    Spaca Moskalyk was a locality northwest of Vegreville and northeast of Mundare, Alberta centered on the Transfiguration of Our Lord Ukrainian Catholic Church[27][28] - named after both Spas, Kalush Raion, Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast, and the Moskalyk family who donated part of their farmland for the church.
    Stry, Alberta and the Stry School District No. 2508,[29] both southeast of Vilna and northeast of Hamlin, Alberta - after Stryi, Stryi Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Ukalta, Alberta, north of Wostok off Secondary Highway 855 near the North Saskatchewan River - possibly a combination of "Ukrayina" and "Alberta".
    Wasel, Alberta, west of Hamlin near the North Saskatchewan River on Highway 652[20] - Polonized spelling of the Ukrainian common name "Vasyl".
    Wostok, Alberta, Polonized spelling of the Russian word vostok, "east" - named by Galician Russophile immigrant Theodore (Teodor) Nemirsky.[30]
    Zawale, Alberta and the Zawale School District No. 1074,[31] both south of Wostok, Alberta off Highway 29 - Polonized misspelling of Zavalya, Sniatyn Raion, Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast.
    Rural school districts
    Bavilla School District No. 1477,[32] part of the community of Wasel west of Hamlin, Alberta near the North Saskatchewan River - ?.
    Berhometh School District No. 1499,[33] northeast of Hairy Hill, Alberta - a misspelling of Berehomet, Vyzhnytsia Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Bohdan School District No. 3097,[8] south of Myrnam, Alberta - from the male given name Bohdan ("God-given"); possibly after Hetman Bohdan Khmelnytsky.
    Borowich School District No. 2052,[34] north of Willingdon, Alberta - possibly after a local family.
    Brody School District No. 1782,[35] northeast of Mundare, Alberta - after Brody, Brody Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Bukowina School District No. 1162,[36] northeast of Andrew, Alberta; German/Polish spelling of the Austrian crownland of Bukovina - part of which is now in Chernivtsi Oblast, Ukraine.
    Chernowci School No. 1456,[37] northeast of Wostok, Alberta - Polonized misspelling of the city of Chernivtsi, Ukraine.
    Chornik School District No. 2343,[34] northeast of Musidora, Alberta - possibly after a local family.
    Czahar School District No. 2322,[34][38] southwest of Willingdon, Alberta - Polonized spelling of the village of Chahor; now a part of the city of Chernivtsi, Ukraine.
    Ispas School District No. 2765,[33] southeast of Hamlin and northwest of Duvernay, Alberta on the south side of the North Saskatchewan River - after Ispas, Vyzhnytsia Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Koluz School District No. 1631,[33] east of Chipman, Alberta - a Polonized misspelling of Kalush, Kalush Raion, Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast.
    Kotzman School District No. 2325,[34] northeast of Smoky Lake, Alberta - the German spelling of Kitsman, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Krasnahora School District No. 2613,[8] south of Musidora, Alberta - a Ukrainian phrase meaning "beautiful hill".
    Krasne School District No. 2245,[39] northeast of Lavoy and south of Two Hills, Alberta - the Ukrainian word for "beautiful".
    Kysylew School District No. 1467,[40] northeast of Wostok, Alberta near the Limestone Creek[32] - a Polonized misspelling of Kyseliv, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Leszniw School District No. 2621,[8] south of Morecambe and northeast of Innisfree, Alberta - Polonized spelling of Leshniv, Brody Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Lwiw School District No. 1474,[41] southeast of St. Michael and northeast of Chipman, Alberta on Highway 29 - Polonized spelling of the city of Lviv, Ukraine.
    Luzan School District No. 2113,[34] halfway between Musidora, Alberta and the North Saskatchewan River - after Luzhany, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Miroslowna School District No. 2528,[34] northeast of Innisfree, Alberta - Polonized spelling of the Ukrainian word "miroslavna", meaning "Glorified Peace".
    Molodia School District No. 1486,[42] south of Andrew and north of Mundare, Alberta at the junction of Highway 29 and Secondary Highway 855 - after Molodiia, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Myrnam School District No. 2219, northwest of the modern townsite of Myrnam, Alberta - "peace to us"; from the Ukrainian word myr, "peace".[43]
    Nizir School District No. 2179,[44] east of Two Hills, southeast of Duvernay and northwest of Musidora, Alberta - ?.
    Oleskow School District No. 1612,[45] southeast of Mundare, Alberta and west of Vegreville; after Joseph Oleskiw (1860–1903) - author of the pamphlets "On Free Lands" (Pro Vilni Zemli, spring 1895),[46][47] and "On Emigration" (O emigratsiy, December 1895).[2]
    Paraskevia School District No. 1487,[40] northeast of Hilliard and north of Mundare, Alberta on Secondary Highway 855[48] - possibly after one of the saints named Paraskevi.
    Peremysl School District No. 2944,[8] southeast of Radway, Alberta on the south side of the North Saskatchewan River on Secondary Highway 831 - a phonetic misspelling of the Ukrainian name ("Peremyshl") for Przemyśl, Poland.[14]
    Podola School District No. 2065,[49] south of Hilliard and west of Mundare, Alberta near the Beaverhill Creek - Polonized spelling of the Ukrainian region of Podillia.
    Pobeda School District No. 1604,[33] southeast of Two Hills and west of Morecambe, Alberta - ?.
    Proswita School District No. 1563,[40] northeast of Star and northwest of St. Michael, Alberta off Highway 45[32] - Polonized spelling of the Ukrainian word for "enlightenment"; possibly after the Prosvita Society of Galicia.
    Provischena School District No. 1476,[40] south of Bellis, Alberta near the North Saskatchewan River[32] - possibly after the Ukrainian word for "prophecy" (provishchennya).
    Pruth School Division No. 2064,[34] northwest of Warwick, Alberta - after the Prut river in Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Radymno School District No. 2942,[8] part of the rural community of Leeshore east of Redwater, Alberta on the south side of the North Saskatchewan River - after the town of Radymno, now in Jarosław County, Poland.[14]
    Russia School District No. 2069,[34] south of Musidora, Alberta; from school board confusion over Rusyny / Ruthenian vs. Russki / Russian.
    Ruthenia School District No. 2408,[34] southeast of Smoky Lake and southwest of Bellis, Alberta - after the Austro-Hungarian name for the Ukrainian territories of Galicia, Bukovina, and Carpathian Ruthenia (now Transcarpathian Oblast).
    Shandro School District No. 1438, halfway between Willingdon, Alberta and the North Saskatchewan River - after the Shandro family from "Rus'kyi Banyliv", Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).[50]
    Sheptycki School District No. 2920,[8] southeast of Waskatenau, Alberta on the south side of the North Saskatchewan River - possibly after The Venerable Metropolitan Andrey Sheptytsky (1865–1944).
    Sherentz School District No. 2614,[8] south of Beauvallon and southwest of Myrnam, Alberta - possibly after Shyrivtsi, currently in Dnistrovskyi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Sich School District No. 1595,[51] northeast of Warwick, Alberta - after the fortresses of the Ukrainian Cossacks.
    Skeskowicz School District No. 1801,[34] southwest of Willingdon, Alberta - ?.
    Skowiatyn School District No. 2483,[34] northwest of Wostok, Alberta near the North Saskatchewan River - after Skoviatyn, Borshchiv Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Slawa School District No. 2400,[34] south of the old townsite of Slawa, Alberta - Polonized spelling of the Ukrainian word "glory" (slava).
    Stanislawow School District No. 1485,[40] northeast of Mundare, Alberta[48] - Polish spelling of the town of Stanislaviv, now Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine.
    Svit School District No. 1491,[40] east of Chipman and northeast of Hilliard, Alberta[52] - the Ukrainian word for "the world" or "light".
    Svoboda School District No. 1479,[11] part of the rural community of Skaro northwest of St. Michael, Alberta at the junction of Highway 45 and Secondary Highway 831 - the Ukrainian word for "liberty".
    Toporoutz School District No. 1935,[44] east of Warspite and southwest of Smoky Lake, Alberta - German spelling of Toporivtsi, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Ukraina School District No. 1672,[33] southeast of Hilliard and southwest of Mundare, Alberta - phonetic spelling of "Ukraine" in the Ukrainian language.
    Uhryn School District No. 2409,[34] southeast of Beauvallon and southwest of Myrnam, Alberta - possibly after one of nine places named "Uhryniv"[53] in Galicia.
    Vladymir School District No. 1217,[54] northwest of Mundare, Alberta - after district pioneer Vladymir Svarich (Volodymyr Zvarych).
    Wolie School District No. 2591,[8] west of Warwick, Alberta on the south shore of Bens Lake - Polonized misspelling of the Ukrainian word "freedom" (volya).
    Zaporoze School District No. 2246,[55] northeast of Lavoy, Alberta - a phonetic spelling of "Zaporizhzhia"; after the Zaporizhian Host of Ukrainian Cossacks.
    Zhoda School District No. 1498,[33] southeast of Willingdon and west of Hairy Hill, Alberta - the Ukrainian word for "harmony".
    Zora School District No. 2487,[34] northwest of the modern townsite of Slawa, Alberta - possibly a misspelling of the Ukrainian word for "dawn" (zoria).

    Manitoba
    Rural communities
    Chortitz, Manitoba, south of Winkler off Highway 32; German spelling of Khortytsia island, located in the Dnipro river now within the city of Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine - Manitoba hamlet named by "Russian" Mennonite immigrants.
    Dneiper, Manitoba[56] (renamed "Fishing River"), east of Ukraina and northeast of Sifton - after the Dnipro river.
    Halicz, Manitoba,[57] northwest of Trembowla and north of Ashville near Highway 10 - a Polonized spelling of Halych, a historic Ukrainian city in Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast.
    Horod, Manitoba, north of Elphinstone on Provincial Road 354, near the south boundary of Riding Mountain National Park - the Ukrainian word for "city".
    Jaroslaw, Manitoba, southwest of Hnausa; the Polish name of the city of Yaroslav, now in Jarosław County, Poland.[14]
    Komarno, Manitoba, the Ukrainian word for "mosquito" - possibly after Komarno, Horodok Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Kulish, Manitoba, northwest of Ethelbert; after Panteleimon Kulish (1819–1897).
    Medika, Manitoba, north of Hadashville on Provincial Road 507 - after Medyka on the present Polish-Ukrainian border.[14]
    Melnice, Manitoba, west of Dunnottar and southwest of Winnipeg Beach, at the junction of Highway 8 and Provincial Road 225 - the Ukrainian word for "windmill".[58]
    Morweena, Manitoba, northwest of Arborg and southeast of Fisher Branch on Provincial Road 329 - ?.
    Okno, Manitoba, northwest of Riverton near Shorncliffe - the Ukrainian word for "window".
    Oleskiw, Manitoba,[59] west of Stuartburn on Provincial Road 201; after Dr. Joseph Oleskiw (1860–1903) - author of the pamphlets "On Free Lands" (Pro Vilni Zemli, spring 1895),[46][47] and "On Emigration" (O emigratsiy, December 1895).[2]
    Olha, Manitoba,[59] east of Rossburn and north of Oakburn on Provincial Road 577; from female given name Olha (c.f. Russian "Olga") - possibly after Princess Olha (c. 890–969).
    Ozerna, Manitoba, southeast of Erickson and northeast of Newdale - literally "lake district".
    Petlura, Manitoba, at the junction of Provincial Road 366 and Provincial Road 584 near the north boundary of Riding Mountain National Park - after Ukrainian independence leader Symon Petliura (1879–1926).
    Prawda, Manitoba, southeast of Hadashville on the eastbound lanes of the Trans-Canada Highway; a Polonized spelling of the Ukrainian (and Russian) word pravda, "truth".
    Ruthenia, Manitoba, northeast of Angusville and north of the Waywayseecappo townsite on Provincial Road 264, near the south boundary of Riding Mountain National Park - after the Austro-Hungarian name for the Ukrainian territories of Galicia, Bukovina, and Carpathian Ruthenia (now Transcarpathian Oblast).
    Seech, Manitoba, east of Olha and northwest of Elphinstone, near the south boundary of Riding Mountain National Park - a phonetic misspelling of the Ukrainian word "sich"; after the fortresses of the Ukrainian Cossacks.
    Senkiw, Manitoba, northwest of Roseau River and southwest of Rosa - possibly after a local family.
    Sirko, Manitoba,[60] south of Sundown near the Minnesota border - possibly after the Ukrainian Cossack leader Ivan Sirko (c. 1610–1680).
    Szewczenko, Manitoba (renamed "Vita"), west of Stuartburn on Provincial Road 201; a Polonized spelling of Taras Shevchenko's last name.
    Trembowla, Manitoba, northwest of Dauphin on Provincial Road 491; the Polish spelling of Terebovlia, Terebovlya Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Ukraina, Manitoba,[61] southeast of Ethelbert and northwest of Sifton on Provincial Road 273; a phonetic spelling of "Ukraine" in the Ukrainian language.
    Vidir, Manitoba, northwest of Arborg on Provincial Road 233 - ?.
    Zbaraz, Manitoba, southeast of Fisher Branch and northwest of Arborg on Provincial Road 329 - a phonetic spelling of Zbarazh, Zbarazh Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Zelana, Manitoba, northeast of Ukraina and east of Ethelbert on Provincial Road 269 - a misspelling of the Ukrainian word for "green" (zelena).
    Zelena, Manitoba, northeast of Makaroff and west of the junction of Provincial Road 594 and Highway 83 - the Ukrainian word for "green".
    Zhoda, Manitoba, north of Vita and southeast of Steinbach on Highway 12; the Ukrainian word for "harmony".
    Zoria, Manitoba,[62] east of Sifton off Highway 10 - the Ukrainian word for "dawn".


    Saskatchewan
    "Krassna" was a parish of German Roman Catholics[63] south of Leader, Saskatchewan - German spelling of Krasne, Izmail Raion, Odesa Oblast.
    St. Volodymyr Ukrainian Park, Saskatchewan, a campground owned by the Saskatoon branch of the Ukrainian Catholic Brotherhood of Canada; featuring a small Ukrainian Catholic church dedicated to St. Volodymyr.
    Places in Regina
    Schools
    Elsie Mironuck Community School in Regina, a public elementary school.
    W. S. Hawrylak School in Regina, a public elementary school.
    Places in Saskatoon
    Schools
    Bishop Filevich Ukrainian Bilingual School in Saskatoon, a Catholic separate school specializing in the study of the Ukrainian language, history and culture.
    Bishop Roborecki School in Saskatoon, a Catholic separate school named after Bishop Andriy Roboretsky, the first leader of the Ukrainian Catholic Eparchy of Saskatoon.
    St. Petro Mohyla Institute, Saskatoon, a private college for the study of the Ukrainian language, history and culture - after St. Petro Mohyla.
    St. Volodymyr School in Saskatoon, a Catholic separate school named after St. Volodymyr the Great.
    Rural communities
    Adamiwka School District No. 1994 and the Ukrainian Catholic Church of the Descent of the Holy Ghost, Adamiwka;[64] both southeast of Rosthern, Saskatchewan - after "Adamivka",[65] now in Jarosław County, Poland.[14]
    Antoniwka was a locality north of Canora, Saskatchewan centered on the Ukrainian Catholic parish of the Assumption; named after Antonivka, Chortkiv Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    "Belyk's" was a locality north of Borden, Saskatchewan centered on the "Ivan Franko National Home" - built on Yurko Belyk's farmland[66] - and the Redberry Park rural post office; also the location of the Assumption of St. Mary Ukrainian Orthodox church.
    Beresina, Saskatchewan, northeast of Churchbridge; German spelling of "Berezyna" (now Rozdil[67] in Mykolaiv Raion), Lviv Oblast - Saskatchewan post office named by ethnic Germans from Galicia.
    Bobulynci was a locality southwest of Rose Valley, Saskatchewan centered on the Ukrainian Catholic parish of The Transfiguration - named after Bobulyntsi, Buchach Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Bodnari (or "Kolo Bodnariv") was a locality northeast of Vonda, Saskatchewan named after Teodor Bodnar,[66] who donated part of his farmland to the Ukrainian Catholic parish of Saints Peter and Paul for a church.
    Buchach was a locality near Hazel Dell, Saskatchewan centered on the Ukrainian Catholic Church of the Patronage of the Blessed Virgin Mary; named after Buchach, Buchach Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Bukowina, Saskatchewan, south of Yellow Creek; German/Polish spelling of the Austrian crownland of Bukovina - part of which is now in Chernivtsi Oblast, Ukraine. Named by Bukovinian immigrant and postmaster John (Ivan) Fessiuk.[68]
    Byrtnyky was a locality between Kelvington and Endeavour, Saskatchewan named after one of three places named "Byrtnyky"[69] in Lviv Oblast.
    Chorney Beach, Saskatchewan, a resort beach at Fishing Lake southeast of Wadena; possibly after a local family.
    Chortitz, Saskatchewan, south of Swift Current on Highway 379; German spelling of Khortytsia island, located in the Dnipro river now within the city of Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine - Saskatchewan hamlet named by "Russian" Mennonite immigrants.
    Dmytruk Lake, north of Cree Lake; after Peter Dmytruk of Wynyard, Saskatchewan (aka "Pierre le Canadien"), a member of the Royal Canadian Air Force who served with the French Resistance after being shot down near Paris in 1943.[70]
    Dneiper, Saskatchewan, north of Rhein, after the Dnipro river.
    Dneister, Saskatchewan (renamed "Hamton"),[71] northeast of Rhein on Highway 650; after the Dniester river.
    Dobrowody, Saskatchewan and the Dobrowody School District No. 2637, both northeast of Rama, Saskatchewan - a Ukrainian phrase meaning "good water"; after a village of the same name ("Dobrovody")[72] in Pidhaitsi Raion, Ternopil Oblast, Ukraine.
    Drobot, Saskatchewan, north of Theodore, after Thomas Drobot - postmaster from 1909 to 1917.
    Halyary, Saskatchewan, southwest of Preeceville - a Postmaster General/Government of Canada misspelling of "Halychy".[73]
    Halycry School District No. 2835, also southwest of Preeceville, Saskatchewan - a Department of Education misspelling of "Halychy".[73]
    Havryliuky was a locality south of Prud'homme, Saskatchewan named after Nicholas Hawryluk (Nykola Havryliuk),[66] who donated part of his farmland for Sacred Heart of Jesus Ukrainian Catholic Church.
    Hryhoriw School District No. 2390 and the Ukrainian Catholic parish of St. Demetrius, Hryhoriw; both south of Preeceville, Saskatchewan - after Hryhoriv, Buchach Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Hory (also called Carpenter-Hory) was a locality southwest of Wakaw, Saskatchewan centering on the Ukrainian Catholic parish of The Ascension of Our Lord Jesus Christ - after the Ukrainian word for "mountains" ("hori").
    Janow School District No. 2842 and Janow Corners, Saskatchewan, both south of Meath Park; after a village called "Yaniv" (now Ivano-Frankove),[74] in Yavoriv Raion, Lviv Oblast, Ukraine.
    Kalyna, Saskatchewan, and the Kalyna School District No. 3945, both south of Meath Park, Saskatchewan - after the Ukrainian word for the "highbush cranberry".
    Kiev was a locality southwest of Rose Valley, Saskatchewan centered on a Ukrainian Orthodox Church; named after the capital city of Ukraine.
    Kobzar School District No. 3597 and the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the Holy Ascension, Arran-Kobzar; both south of Arran, Saskatchewan - after the book of poems by Taras Shevchenko.
    Kolo Pidskal'noho (or "Pidskalny's") was a locality west of Cudworth, Saskatchewan named after Ivan Pidskalny,[75] who donated part of his farmland to the Ukrainian Catholic parish of St. Demetrius for a church.
    Kolo Solomyanoho was a locality west of Cudworth, Saskatchewan named after Ivan Solomyany,[75] who donated part of his farmland for the (unspecified) Ukrainian Church of the Holy Transfiguration.
    Kowalowka School District No. 1739 and the Ukrainian Catholic Church of The Transfiguration, Kovalivka; both northeast of Canora, Saskatchewan - after Kovalivka, Buchach Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Krasne, Saskatchewan, west of Wishart, the Ukrainian word for "beautiful"; after a village in Pidvolochysk Raion,[72] Ternopil Oblast, Ukraine.
    Krydor, Saskatchewan, after Peter (Petro) Krysak and Teodor Lucyk, local settlers.
    Krim was a locality south of Aberdeen, Saskatchewan and is the German spelling of the Crimean peninsula - named by "Russian" Mennonites from the Taurida Governorate of the Russian Empire, now Ukraine.
    Kulykiv was a locality north of Invermay, Saskatchewan named after Kulykiv, Zhovkva Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Kvitka, Saskatchewan, south of Jedburgh, after Gregory (Hryhory) Kvitka (1778–1843), Ukrainian novelist.
    Kyziv-Tiaziv, Saskatchewan, south of Rama, after Tiaziv, Tysmenytsia Raion, Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast.[76][77]
    Laniwci, Saskatchewan, and the Laniwci School District No. 2300, both west of Alvena, Saskatchewan - Polonized spelling of Lanivtsi, Borshchiv Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Lemberg, Saskatchewan, German name for Lviv, Ukraine - Saskatchewan town named by ethnic Germans from Galicia.
    Leskiw Lake, southwest of Creighton, Saskatchewan; after Anthony Leskiw of Saskatoon, "lost at sea in October 1940 while serving aboard SS Whitford Point, torpedoed in the north Atlantic by a German submarine".[75]
    Malonek, Saskatchewan, and the Malonek School District No. 3669, both northeast of Pelly, Saskatchewan; perhaps after "Malynivka"[78] - now Malinówka, Brzozów County, Poland.[14]
    New Yaroslau, the name of a Ukrainian block settlement northeast of Yorkton, Saskatchewan; after the ancient city of Yaroslav - now in Jarosław County, Poland.[14]
    Odessa, Saskatchewan, after the city of Odesa, Ukraine - Saskatchewan village named by ethnic Germans from the neighbouring Bessarabia Governorate of the Russian Empire, which is today split between Moldova and Ukraine.
    Orolow, Saskatchewan (also called "Teshliuk's"),[69] south of Krydor - Polonized misspelling of Ordiv, Radekhiv Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Paniowce, Saskatchewan (renamed "Swan Plain"[79]), north of Norquay on Highway 8 - Polonized misspelling of Panivtsi Zelene, Borshchiv Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Rak, Saskatchewan, northeast of Vonda on Highway 41 - after Joseph Rak[66] from Lanivtsi, Borshchiv Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Rebryna was a locality northeast of Hafford, Saskatchewan centered on the "Redberry Ivan Franko Library and Hall", named after Paul (Pavlo) Rebryna.[66]
    Sich School District No. 3454, the Sich community hall and the Ukrainian Catholic parish of St. Michael, "Krydor Sich"; all west of Blaine Lake, Saskatchewan - after the fortresses of the Ukrainian Cossacks.
    Sokal, Saskatchewan, and the Sokal School District No. 1955, both west of Wakaw, Saskatchewan - named after Sokal, Sokal Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Stanislavtsi was a locality south of Foam Lake, Saskatchewan named after Stanislaviv (now Ivano-Frankivsk), Ukraine; also the location of the "Michael Hrushewski" community hall.
    Tarnopol, Saskatchewan, Polonized spelling of Ternopil, Ternopil Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Vasyliv (or "Kolo Vasyleva") was a locality south of Buchanan, Saskatchewan centered on the Ukrainian Catholic parish of Saints Constantine and Helena; named after "N. Wasyliw".[75]
    Vorobceve was a locality just west of Krydor, Saskatchewan centered on the Ukrainian Catholic Church of St. Demetrius; named after the Worobetz family.[80]
    Walawa, Saskatchewan, west of Theodore; Polonized spelling of "Valiava" - now in Przemyśl County, Poland.[14]
    Welechko (or "Bilya Velychka") was a locality south of Hafford, Saskatchewan, named after Ivan Welechko[66] - who donated part of his farmland to the Ukrainian Catholic parish of The Presentation for a church; also the location of the "Taras Shewchenko" community hall.
    Whitkow, Saskatchewan, west of Mayfair on Highway 378, is an Anglo-Polonized spelling[81] of Vytkiv, Radekhiv Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Rural school districts
    Bereziw School District No. 3030 (changed to "Slawa School"),[78] south of Hafford, Saskatchewan; after the district (povit) of "Bereziv" - now Brzozów County, Poland.[14]
    Bogucz School District No. 1743, southeast of Canora, Saskatchewan; possibly after "Bohusa" - now Bogusza,[78] Nowy Sącz County, Poland.[14]
    Bohdan School District No. 3511, east of Mayfair, Saskatchewan; from the male given name Bohdan ("God-given") - possibly after Bohdan Khmelnytsky.
    Bridok School District No. 1765, south of Canora, Saskatchewan, after Bridok, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Bukowina School District No. 2012, southeast of Wakaw, Saskatchewan; German/Polish spelling of the Austrian crownland of Bukovina - part of which is now in Chernivtsi Oblast, Ukraine.
    Cheremosz School District No. 4004, north of Endeavour, Saskatchewan, after the Cheremosh river that separated Galicia and Bukovina.
    Crimea School District No. 4195, southwest of Eatonia, Saskatchewan, after the peninsula in the Black Sea - School named by ethnic Germans from the Taurida Governorate of the Russian Empire, now Ukraine.
    Czernawka School District No. 1712, north of MacNutt, Saskatchewan; Polonized misspelling of "Cherniavka" - now Czerniawka,[78] in Jarosław County, Poland.[14]
    Dnister School District No. 1635, southwest of Canora, Saskatchewan, after the Dniester river.
    Dobraniwka School District No. 2608, southeast of Rosthern, Saskatchewan; a Polonized variation of the Ukrainian phrase for "extremely good"[82] ("dobraniv").
    Drahomanow School District No. 2501, southeast of Prud'homme, Saskatchewan, after Mykhailo Drahomanov (1841–1895).
    Fedoruk School District No. 2342, southwest of Veregin, Saskatchewan, after school trustee Nicoli (Mykola) Fedoruk.[83]
    Fosti School District No. 1700, south of Sheho, Saskatchewan, after school board treasurer John (Ivan) Fosti.[84]
    Franko School District No. 1740, east of Canora, Saskatchewan, after Ivan Franko (1856–1916).
    Halicz School District No. 3204, northwest of Wishart, Saskatchewan; Polonized spelling of the historic Ukrainian city in Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast - named by a "Mr. Bodnarchuk".[85]
    Horodenka School District No. 1845, west of Wakaw, Saskatchewan, after Horodenka, Kolomyia Raion, Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast.
    Horosziwci School District No. 2433 (renamed "War End School"),[78] west of Theodore, Saskatchewan; possibly after "Horokhivtsi" - now in Przemyśl County, Poland.[14]
    Husiatyn School District No. 791 (renamed "Claytonville School"),[86] south of Meath Park, Saskatchewan, after Husiatyn, Husiatyn Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Jablonow School District No. 1672 (renamed "Wroxton School")[87] at Wroxton, Saskatchewan - Polonized spelling of Yabloniv, Kolomyia Raion, Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast.
    Jarema School District No. 1731, north of Calder, Saskatchewan, possibly after the town of Yaremche[87] in Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast.
    Kaminka School District No. 1632 at Tway, Saskatchewan, after "Kaminka"/Kamianka-Buzka, Kamianka-Buzka Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Kiev School District No. 1728 (originally "Kyjiw"), north of Alvena, Saskatchewan - after the capital city of Ukraine.
    Kitzman Scholl District No. 2400, northeast of Rhein, Saskatchewan, after Kitsman, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Kolomyia School District No. 1878, west of Wakaw, Saskatchewan, after Kolomyia, Kolomyia Raion, Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast.
    Krasne School District No. 3058, south of Hafford, Saskatchewan - the Ukrainian word for "beautiful".
    Krasny School District No. 1121, southwest of Sheho, Saskatchewan - also after the Ukrainian word for "beautiful".
    Larisa School District No. 5186, west of Wishart, Saskatchewan, after Larysa Kosach-Kvitka (Lesia Ukrainka, 1871–1913).
    Lodi School District No. 3509, north of Okla, Saskatchewan, the Ukrainian word for "ice".
    Luzan School District No. 255, south of Veregin, Saskatchewan, after Luzhany, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Lysenko School District No. 494, at Insinger, Saskatchewan, after Mykola Lysenko (1842–1912).
    Mazeppa School District No. 2860, southeast of Canora, Saskatchewan, after Hetman Ivan Mazepa.
    Monastyr School District No. 2328, north of Buchanan, Saskatchewan, after Monastyryska, Monastyryska Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Mostetz School District No. 1734, northwest of Calder, Saskatchewan, Germanic spelling[88] of "Mostyshche"/Mostyska, Mostyska Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Nauka School District No. 3059, south of Hafford, Saskatchewan - the Ukrainian word for "learning".
    Nichlava School District No. 1877 (formerly "Heuboden School"),[89] southeast of Rosthern, Saskatchewan, after the Nichlava river in Ternopil Oblast.
    Odessa School District No. 2327, south of Tramping Lake, Saskatchewan; after the city of Odesa, Ukraine - School named by ethnic Germans from the neighbouring Bessarabia Governorate of the Russian Empire, which is today split between Moldova and Ukraine.
    Oleskow School District No. 540, north of Rhein, Saskatchewan, after Joseph Oleskiw (1860–1903) - author of the pamphlets "On Free Lands" (Pro Vilni Zemli, spring 1895),[46][47] and "On Emigration" (O emigratsiy, December 1895).[2]
    Orolow School District No. 2392, south of Krydor, Saskatchewan - a Department of Education misspelling of Ordiv, Radekhiv Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Osin School District No. 3598, north of Arran, Saskatchewan, the Ukrainian word for "autumn".
    Oukraina School District No. 2402, west of Krydor, Saskatchewan - a Department of Education phonetic spelling of Ukrayina (Ukraine).
    Ozeriany School District No. 2722 (renamed "Carpathian School"), south of Cudworth, Saskatchewan - the Ukrainian word for "from the lake"; after one of four places named "Ozeriany"[90] in Galicia.
    Paniowce School District No. 291 (renamed "Swan Plain School"),[79] north of Norquay, Saskatchewan on Highway 8 - Polonized misspelling of Panivtsi Zelene, Borshchiv Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Paseika School District No. 2419, south of Arran, Saskatchewan - a Department of Education phonetic spelling of "pasika"; a Ukrainian word for "beehive" or "apiary".
    Podole School District No. 3227, northeast of Prince Albert, Saskatchewan - the Polish spelling of the Ukrainian region of Podillia.
    Podolia School District No. 2384, northeast of Arran, Saskatchewan - a misspelling of the Ukrainian region of Podillia.
    Pohorlowtz School District No. 2578, southwest of Sheho, Saskatchewan - Germanic misspelling[74] of Pohoril'tsi, Peremyshliany Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Poltawa School District No. 2335 (renamed "Carpenter School"),[91] northeast of Cudworth, Saskatchewan; Polonized spelling of the city of Poltava, Ukraine - probably after the famous battle in 1709.
    Probizna School District No. 1724 (renamed "Geddes School"),[86] northeast of Wroxton, Saskatchewan, after Probizhna, Chortkiv Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Prosvita School District No. 3457, west of Mayfair, Saskatchewan, after the Prosvita Society in Galicia.
    Radimno School District No. 2682, southeast of Willowbrook, Saskatchewan; after the town of Radymno, now in Jarosław County, Poland.[14]
    Rak School District No. 3244, northeast of Vonda, Saskatchewan on Highway 41 - after Joseph Rak[66] from Lanivtsi, Borshchiv Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Rus School District No. 2584, south of Hafford, Saskatchewan, after Kievan Rus'.
    Ruthenia School District No. 404, southwest of Cudworth, Saskatchewan; after the Austro-Hungarian name for the Ukrainian territories of Galicia, Bukovina, and Carpathian Ruthenia (now Transcarpathian Oblast).
    Sambor School District No. 4057, northeast of Dysart, Saskatchewan; Polonized spelling of Sambir, Sambir Raion, Lviv Oblast - School named by ethnic Germans from Galicia.
    Scalat School District No. 1623, southeast of Canora, Saskatchewan - misspelling of Skalat, Pidvolochysk Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Siczynski School District No. 2513, near Meacham, Saskatchewan - Polonized spelling of the last name of Ukrainian composer and conductor Denys Sichynsky (1865–1909).[92]
    Skala School District No. 2712, west of Cudworth, Saskatchewan - after Skala-Podilska, Borshchiv Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Slawa School District No. 3030 (formerly "Bereziw School"),[78] south of Hafford, Saskatchewan - Polonized spelling of the Ukrainian word "glory" (slava).
    Sniatyn School District No. 1729, west of Wakaw, Saskatchewan, after Sniatyn, Sniatyn Raion, Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast.
    Stanisloff School District No. 3105, south of Foam Lake, Saskatchewan - a Department of Education phonetic misspelling of "Stanislav", after Stanislaviv (now Ivano-Frankivsk), Ukraine.
    Stawchan School District No. 1826, north of Rhein, Saskatchewan - a Polonized misspelling of Stavchany, Horodok Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Stryj School District No. 3201, north of Goodeve, Saskatchewan - German/Polish spelling of Stryi, Stryi Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Svoboda School District No. 1704, northwest of Alvena, Saskatchewan - the Ukrainian word for "liberty".
    Taras School District No. 4880, north of Gronlid, Saskatchewan, after Taras Shevchenko.
    Toporoutz School District No. 1666 (renamed "Chaucer School"),[68] north of Calder, Saskatchewan - German spelling of Toporivtsi, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Torsk School District No. 1713, east of Calder, Saskatchewan - after Torske, Zalishchyky Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Vasloutz School District No. 2642, south of Buchanan, Saskatchewan - Germanic misspelling of Vasylkivtsi,[79] Husiatyn Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Verenczanka School District No. 264 (renamed "New Canadian School"),[68] east of Rhein, Saskatchewan - Polonized spelling of Verenchanka, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Vesna School District No. 736, southeast of Arran, Saskatchewan, the Ukrainian word for "spring (season)".
    Verbowska School District No. 1737, north of MacNutt, Saskatchewan; a Polonized misspelling of Verbivka, Borshchiv Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Vladimir School District No. 2193, west of Alvena, Saskatchewan, after St. Volodymyr the Great.
    Wasileff School District No. 1692 (renamed "Yemen School"),[68] west of Insinger, Saskatchewan - an Anglo-Polonized spelling of Vasyliv, Chernivtsi Raion, Chernivtsi Oblast (Bukovina).
    Whitkow School District No. 4508 and Whitkow Hamlet School District No. 5118, both west of Mayfair, Saskatchewan on Highway 378; an Anglo-Polonized spelling[81] of Vytkiv, Radekhiv Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Wisnia School District No. 2870, southeast of Veregin, Saskatchewan - Polonized misspelling of the Vyshnia river in Lviv Oblast.
    Wolia School District No. 3503, southwest of Glaslyn, Saskatchewan - Polonized spelling of the Ukrainian word "freedom" (volya).
    Wolna School District No. 3503, east of Rama, Saskatchewan - Polonized spelling of the Ukrainian word "free" (vilna).
    Wysla School District No. 4106, southwest of Canora, Saskatchewan - Polonized misspelling of the Ukrainian word (Vysla) for the Vistula river.
    Zamok School District No. 784, south of Meath Park, Saskatchewan, after Zamok, Zhovkva Raion, Lviv Oblast.
    Zaporoze School District No. 3188, west of Krydor, Saskatchewan - a Department of Education phonetic spelling of "Zaporizhzhia";[93] after the Zaporizhian Host of Ukrainian Cossacks.
    Zayacz School District No. 3416 (renamed "Liberal School"), north of Calder, Saskatchewan, after school trustee "A. Zayacz"[94] (Zayach?).
    Zazula School District No. 4526, northwest of Hendon, Saskatchewan, after district pioneer Fred Zazula.[75]
    Zbaraz School District No. 2403, south of Krydor, Saskatchewan, a misspelling of Zbarazh, Zbarazh Raion, Ternopil Oblast.
    Zhoda School District No. 2377, south of Mikado, Saskatchewan, the Ukrainian word for "harmony".
    Zoria School District No. 3471, west of Mayfair, Saskatchewan, the Ukrainian word for "dawn".

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Mr. Hack, @Gerard1234

    LMAO. As is expected, this fantasist, fuckwit lowlife who has never been to Ukraine, Russia, Europe, and possibly even outside of its mother’s basement…….. is that pitiful it blindly ( or probably for deliberate disinformation purposes) links some article , that only further shows this idiot doesn’t speak a word of Ukrainian or Russian…..it proves EXACTLY what I was saying.

    Of course , Ivan Sirko “sure” ukrop nationalists from the west are going to name place after him! That “typical”, ancient ukrop word of “Lemburg”, LMAO. That typical ukrainian letter of W featured in several of these names you dumb fuck! As I said, this idiot disseminates filth he hasn’t even read or certainly doesn’t understand.

    As can be deciphered after about 10 seconds of looking through this fantasists BS, there is not even ONE village, before we even get to town which is “Ukrainian”.

    What we have are predominantly – Poles or Russian names of places you retard. You would think a useless scumbag as yourself would stay far away from the word “mir” given one of your other plentiful disasters exposing yourself involving that word…..but we are dealing with a sociopathic scumtroll here.

    We do have places named after settlers ( that’s completely different you dumb prick, even for ukronazis, expecting all of them to be useless is naive) for what they have done in Canada…….and if as they emigrated they even viewed themselves as “Ukrainian” is highly unlikely

    St. Vladimir Catholic Elementary School – LOL, where to start with this? Uniate heretic faggots using Vladimir the Great for Catholic purposes…oh…and that its Vladimir not Volodomyr

    So with out any actual places, this retard is forced into pitifully having this link that is reduced to “localities”, literally a place where somebody has taken a shit in an open field, and had some 1940s-50s highly insecure banderatard falsely edit them onto a wikipedia page to classify these nonexistent places based on this puddle and shit in a field. I clicked on 3 of them, and of course NONE of them were actually called what this fake BS on wikipedia links them as.

    School district, WTF? How pathetic is this.

    Odessa, Krim, a million other clearly Polish places. As seen in this retards idiotic discussion with the excellent Beckow about nobility, he links deliberate fake BS that in zero way supports his lie…..and it just shows how dumb the retards who linked to it are.

    And where is the US, on this list? Interesting in that this sack of shit being American is about the only thing not false about this freak. Normally this freak invents a fake relative to “support” his fake argument, but with this he can’t even fake a Canadian he knows living in these so-called diaspora areas.

    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @Gerard1234

    https://i.pinimg.com/originals/38/b8/c8/38b8c851588adfd680de60b60412730b.jpg

    , @AP
    @Gerard1234


    LMAO. As is expected, this fantasis
     
    You were caught posting from some post-industrial shithole in northern England. The worst place to live in England. What a loser. I guess a Sovok untermensch "civil engineer" is good for cleaning an abandoned factory.

    How is life among the Pakistani gangs? Do they appreciate your gender fluidity (you have admitted it)?

    It's funny how much you wrote, when you were shown to be an ignorant moron as usual.

    Since you insist, we will continue the lesson.

    In North America, place names come from the first settlers. Ukrainians came to North America in the late 19th century. By that time, most places were already long-settled. In the USA, most Ukrainians came to New York, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Ohio, Chicago, Michigan. These places had been settled and named for hundreds of years. So there are probably no Ukrainian place names in the USA.

    But in the Canadian prairies, Ukrainians were often the first settlers. So that is where the Ukrainian place names are.

    For example, Ukraina, Manitoba:

    https://roadsidethoughts.com/mb/ukraina-profile.htm

    You claim people who didn't think they were Ukrainian would name a place Ukraina?

    A Canadian government source with some more Ukrainian place names:

    https://www.communitystories.ca/v1/pm_v2.php?id=story_line&lg=English&fl=0&ex=00000464&sl=5522&pos=1

    A resident of Ukraina in Manitoba (near Dauphin) tells how, in 1897, a group of Ukrainian immigrants settled on virgin territory some 200 miles from Winnipeg. Once established, the immigrants met to agree on the geographic name to be given the settlement. A proposal that the new settlement bear the name "Ukraina" out of respect for their native land won general agreement. The next step was a letter to Ottawa with a request that the name be officially registered. A request that the near-by railway station be called Dnipro was also forwarded at the same time. The government agreed to the request for Ukraina but rejected the other request with the explanation that there was already a community named Dnipro in Saskatchewan. That is how the first place name ''Ukraina" appeared in Canada. Altogether there are three - one in each of the western provinces. Place names borrowed from the homeland also crop up in names like Halicz, Zbaraz. Komarno, Seech, Dnieper, Poltava, Ternopol, Luzan, Sniatyn, Sokal, Kiev, Boian, Jaroslaw, Stry, Shepenge, Dniester, Zbruch, Prut, Karpati, and others.

    :::::::::::::::::

    If you knew something about Slavic languages, you would know that Ukrainian uses the Cyrillic alphabet. This alphabet is different from the Latin one. Did you know, idiot-Gerard, that Polish is a Slavic languages and that it uses the Latin alphabet?

    When Ukrainians came to North America they often uses Latin letters as Poles do. So "v" becomes "w," "ch" becomes "cz." This occurred with surnames and some place names.

    Here is from the Canadian Encyclopedia:

    https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/timeline/ukrainian-canadian-history

    "In 1892, a small group of immigrants organized by Ivan Pylypow"

    Note the "w."

    That is why there is a town in Canada called "Slawa."

    It has a Ukrainian Orthodox cemetery:

    https://www.findagrave.com/cemetery/2578461/saint-mary's-ukrainian-orthodox-cemetery

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Mr. Hack, @Dmitry, @Gerard1234

  877. @Ivashka the fool
    @Another Polish Perspective

    ⁷Putin supposedly comes from a very modest background in the Ligovo neighborhood in Piter. That might explain his will to get wealthy and influential by any means and his nouveau riche hedonism.

    However, we know that his Tver Karelian grandfather worked as a cook for Lenin in Gorky. This is interesting, because at the time, the ethnic Russian personnel for the Bolshevik elite were supposedly selected from the most radical Old Believer fraction of Netovshhina that have completely rejected the clergy and all the rites. The Netovshhina types were convinced that the Tsarist government was the Antichrist government. These radical sectarian people were supposedly recruited and managed by Krasin, who was the Bolshevik Old Believer liaison probably responsible for killing Savva Morozov, a death that the French government preferred to rule a suicide.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonid_Krasin

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Savva_Morozov

    BTW, although merchants, the Old Believer Morozov family was related to the family of Boyarinya Morozova, the aristocrat who was martyred for her staunchly Old Believer stance.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feodosia_Morozova

    Therefore, the Morozovs retained their wealth and influence despite all the persecutions, until Savva decided to finance the Reds following his mistress requests.

    https://www.rbth.com/history/336239-how-russian-empires-wealthiest-man-sponsored-bolsheviks

    Another example of typically Russian lack of limits.

    Replies: @Another Polish Perspective, @LatW

    These rich Old Believers may have seen Antichrist in tzar, but certainly they weren’t following The Old Testament when marrying cousins. It seems they were overall a bit like Protestants/Puritans in the West

    Savva Morozov married his second-cousin’s wife Zinaida Grigorievna, née Zimin (Russian: Зинаида Григорьевна Зимина)

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Savva_Morozov

    That his family were ostentatious hedonists doesn’t speak well about their faith too.

    This Krasin died from “blood disease” which is often a burden of progeny of cousin marriages.

    While Krasin was negotiating formal recognition of the Bolshevik government by the United Kingdom and France, and despite remedies proposed by his old friend, the physician Alexander Bogdanov, he died from a blood disease.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonid_Krasin

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @Another Polish Perspective

    AFAIK Krasin was not an Old Believer. His father was a police officer, a profession that the Old Believers could not choose due to government imposed restrictions and also to religious considerations. A blood disease at the time could mean anything, for example a leukemia. Bagdanov was one of the first medical researchers to experiment with blood transfer (that's how he died, after an experiment in which he took part). Bogdanov established the Moscow Blood Institute, which was the first in the world. If he advised Krasin about his health problems, then most probably Krasin developed some abnormality in his blood formula. Interestingly enough, Krasin was involved in the sale of Russian Empire national treasures in Great Britain to finance the restart of the Soviet economy after the Civil War. That's where he fell sick.

  878. @John Johnson
    @Mikel


    Yes I have watched Putin’s Jewish propagandist many times.
     
    No, you haven’t, and I doubt you had even heard of him before I mentioned his name to you.

    You Putin defenders are terrible at verifying anything. You can't even do a simple search on my history.

    I talked about him last year before anyone else.

    Since you are too lazy/incapable of using a simple search:
    https://www.unz.com/?s=Solovyov&Action=Search&ptype=all&commentsearch=only&commenter=John+Johnson

    If you had anything of interest to say, you wouldn’t be repeating the silly American boomer trope that Russia is some kind of North Korea with no freedom of speech

    I'm not a boomer and Russia's sentences of journalists have been public.

    You should just quit. You're terrible at this compared to the other bootlickers.

    Leave the whoring to MacGregor and Ritter. They aren't very good but they are the best that Team Dwarf has to work with.

    Replies: @Mikel

    You Putin defenders are terrible at verifying anything.

    Are you just incapable of using anything but loser arguments? Unlike you, I don’t defend any of the two Eastern Slavic warring dwarfs. You just pile on repetitive stuff about one dwarf while kissing the other dwarf’s bottom. The one who lies through his teeth in order to get you and your family in a world war.

    Btw, the only two Putin defenders left here are Gerard and Mikhail. All the rest are gone. Are you really posting here your MSM lines in order to win over two commenters?

    • Replies: @AP
    @Mikel


    Btw, the only two Putin defenders left here are Gerard and Mikhail
     
    There are also QCIC and the LondonBob guy, who writes sporadically. AnoninTN may come back.

    The funny thing is that the anti-Putin guys are more connected to Russia than the pro-Putin guys. Mikhail doesn't even speak Russian, despite being of Russian descent. One would think that he would at least have bothered learning the language. I at least speak it well enough to get mistaken for a tourist from the near abroad such as Poland, Latvia, or Czechia (I have gotten such questions - I was never was mistaken for a Ukrainian when speaking Russian in Moscow, they probably assume Ukrainians speak better Russian than I do). Gerard lives in a shithole in northern industrial England. I last visited Moscow in 2019. I suspect he hasn't been back as recently.

    BTW, if he lies that I was never in Russia, I did meet our former host in Moscow, as he confirmed:

    https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-40/

    (looking at the the archived posts from that month, highlighted the high quality of this blog when it was active, thanks to Karlin)

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Mikel, @QCIC, @Mikhail

  879. @Gerard1234
    @AP

    LMAO. As is expected, this fantasist, fuckwit lowlife who has never been to Ukraine, Russia, Europe, and possibly even outside of its mother's basement........ is that pitiful it blindly ( or probably for deliberate disinformation purposes) links some article , that only further shows this idiot doesn't speak a word of Ukrainian or Russian.....it proves EXACTLY what I was saying.


    Of course , Ivan Sirko "sure" ukrop nationalists from the west are going to name place after him! That "typical", ancient ukrop word of "Lemburg", LMAO. That typical ukrainian letter of W featured in several of these names you dumb fuck! As I said, this idiot disseminates filth he hasn't even read or certainly doesn't understand.

    As can be deciphered after about 10 seconds of looking through this fantasists BS, there is not even ONE village, before we even get to town which is "Ukrainian".

    What we have are predominantly - Poles or Russian names of places you retard. You would think a useless scumbag as yourself would stay far away from the word "mir" given one of your other plentiful disasters exposing yourself involving that word.....but we are dealing with a sociopathic scumtroll here.

    We do have places named after settlers ( that's completely different you dumb prick, even for ukronazis, expecting all of them to be useless is naive) for what they have done in Canada.......and if as they emigrated they even viewed themselves as "Ukrainian" is highly unlikely

    St. Vladimir Catholic Elementary School - LOL, where to start with this? Uniate heretic faggots using Vladimir the Great for Catholic purposes...oh...and that its Vladimir not Volodomyr

    So with out any actual places, this retard is forced into pitifully having this link that is reduced to "localities", literally a place where somebody has taken a shit in an open field, and had some 1940s-50s highly insecure banderatard falsely edit them onto a wikipedia page to classify these nonexistent places based on this puddle and shit in a field. I clicked on 3 of them, and of course NONE of them were actually called what this fake BS on wikipedia links them as.

    School district, WTF? How pathetic is this.

    Odessa, Krim, a million other clearly Polish places. As seen in this retards idiotic discussion with the excellent Beckow about nobility, he links deliberate fake BS that in zero way supports his lie.....and it just shows how dumb the retards who linked to it are.

    And where is the US, on this list? Interesting in that this sack of shit being American is about the only thing not false about this freak. Normally this freak invents a fake relative to "support" his fake argument, but with this he can't even fake a Canadian he knows living in these so-called diaspora areas.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @AP

  880. @Dmitry
    @Mr. XYZ

    This date is not accurate. If you look at complete fertility rates, it was below replacement rate in the Nazi Germany years.

    Some your other texts are inaccurate as well. You seem to think fertility rate is easily changed. You are writing strange comments about the motives for the invasion with Ukraine, you also still continue to write about "economies of scale" after I already explained to you this is incorrect.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    Do you have a source for the first part, please?

    Fertility rate is not *easily* changed but it can theoretically be done. For instance, ex-USSR Jews after moving to Israel.

    I’m arguing against Anatoly Karlin’s arguments in favor of Russia attacking Ukraine. Though maybe the kremlins have never considered such arguments. Not sure.

    As for economies of scale, here you go:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economies_of_scale

    • Replies: @Dmitry
    @Mr. XYZ

    This is the completed fertility by birth cohort. As you can see, fertility rate in Germany is below replacement (which is a higher than 2,1 in this epoch), for the 1930s. It rises to replacement for cohorts of women born after 1926 (parents of the baby boomers).

    https://i.imgur.com/e7JHMIS.jpg

    economies of scale, here you go:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economies_of_scale
     

    This article is about companies in microeconomics. It doesn't say countries should prioritize increasing population. That is not the correct understanding of the terminology.

    As for the ideal population size for countries, I'm sure there are better resources for discussing this theme, but we could return again to the world happiness report. Except Netherlands, the top countries have populations around 10 million or less. https://edition.cnn.com/travel/article/world-happiest-countries-2023-wellness/index.html Iceland is less than 400,000 people, Luxembourg is less than 700,000 people.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @AP

  881. @LatW
    @Wokechoke


    You stated that you wouldn’t mind the erasure of a white Europe as long as the darkies who inherited it would keep speaking Latvian in your particular corner of Europe. Just economics you said.
     
    I never said anything like that. What I may have said is that it doesn't matter if a country is in the EU or not, once a country reaches a certain level of GDP per capita, it will have this issue. And that this is a global economic phenomenon.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Wokechoke

    Yes, people prefer to move to wealthy countries. The challenge for those countries is being selective about whom they allow into their countries.

  882. @S
    @Anatoly Karlin


    ...the only defensible if cynical form of cooperation with them [RDK] from an EHC perspective would be to “utilize” them as cannon fodder against stronger regressive forces and lock up any survivors under hate crimes charges when they outlive their usefulness.
     
    I think that is the general idea across the board here with the 'Nazis!'TM, ie 'keep your friends close, keep your enemies even closer'.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    Yep. But also EHC might not have a problem with alliances of convenience with far-right elements just so long as these elements will be friendly and not hostile towards EHC and indeed be willing to do EHC’s bidding.

  883. @songbird
    @Mr. Hack

    Have always enjoyed the stereotype of the fiery red-haired woman, but I, regret to say, have never observed it IRL.
    Don't know if it is universal, but it even seems to appeal to the Japanese.
    https://youtu.be/kBhbZMHgDqg

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

    How many Irish do you suppose are actually redheads? I’ve certainly met a few such examples (including a Ukrainian/Irish mix). Here’s a photo of a beautiful Ukrainian redhead, of which there are more than a few examples:


    Alina Kovalenko.

    • Replies: @Coconuts
    @Mr. Hack

    Iirc Scotland has the most redheads, then Ireland is somewhere with Udmurts people in terms of the number. I might be wrong, just going from what I can remember.

    Many redheads wherever they are found seem to resemble each other in some way.

    Replies: @QCIC, @Wokechoke

    , @Greasy William
    @Mr. Hack

    she is beautiful

    , @songbird
    @Mr. Hack

    Pretty.

    Would suppose it must be close to 10% of the natives in Ireland. Recessive carriers must be higher, and account for the very pale skin you often see even among the dark-haired. The Western shore is a very cloudy place.

    I knew a lot of redheads in school with Irish blood.

    You would think "Red" wouldn't be a very good nickname in Ireland, but there were many men mentioned in the annals with it, like Owen Roe O'Neill.

    Have always felt an affinity for the reds (phenotypic) of Eastern Europe.

    IIRC, sudden death said the Udmurts would attack me, and not make me their king and not select their most attractive sisters for my harem. Of course, he is full of it.

    Replies: @sudden death

    , @Mr. XYZ
    @Mr. Hack

    She looks a bit similar to the Disney princess Merida:

    https://imgix.bustle.com/rehost/2016/9/13/9cc6001f-4571-4425-ba33-2834762f4c34.jpg?w=800&fit=crop&crop=faces&auto=format%2Ccompress

  884. Ukrainian troops are successfully surrounding Lymon, and are poised to take it back very soon! The palamar who provided direction for the altar boys at my childhood church was called Mr. Lymon. The Russian speaking man lovingly served his Ukrainian Orthodox church, and I’m sure that if he was still alive, he’d be pleased with these developments.

    The beginning of Russia’s presence in Ukraine starting to crack? You know it.

    • Thanks: Mr. XYZ
  885. @Another Polish Perspective
    @Ivashka the fool

    These rich Old Believers may have seen Antichrist in tzar, but certainly they weren't following The Old Testament when marrying cousins. It seems they were overall a bit like Protestants/Puritans in the West

    Savva Morozov married his second-cousin's wife Zinaida Grigorievna, née Zimin (Russian: Зинаида Григорьевна Зимина)
     

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Savva_Morozov

    That his family were ostentatious hedonists doesn't speak well about their faith too.


    This Krasin died from "blood disease" which is often a burden of progeny of cousin marriages.


    While Krasin was negotiating formal recognition of the Bolshevik government by the United Kingdom and France, and despite remedies proposed by his old friend, the physician Alexander Bogdanov, he died from a blood disease.
     
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonid_Krasin

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

    AFAIK Krasin was not an Old Believer. His father was a police officer, a profession that the Old Believers could not choose due to government imposed restrictions and also to religious considerations. A blood disease at the time could mean anything, for example a leukemia. Bagdanov was one of the first medical researchers to experiment with blood transfer (that’s how he died, after an experiment in which he took part). Bogdanov established the Moscow Blood Institute, which was the first in the world. If he advised Krasin about his health problems, then most probably Krasin developed some abnormality in his blood formula. Interestingly enough, Krasin was involved in the sale of Russian Empire national treasures in Great Britain to finance the restart of the Soviet economy after the Civil War. That’s where he fell sick.

  886. @Mikel
    @sudden death


    those who are against invasions in and killings of neighbouring people in principle, no matter how succesfully it could be done, are thrown in jail with multiple years sentences.
     
    You are surely much more familiar with the Russian and Ukrainian media landscape than me and have the advantage of speaking Russian but I think you are clearly exaggerating. That famous reporter who criticized the war live on TV at the beginning wasn't imprisoned. If my memory doesn't fail, she was let go with a fine (not dissimilar to what would happen in many Western countries under a war scenario). And that girl from St Petersburg who was arrested for participating in anti-war protests was later equally free to continue her political activities and actually hand over a lethal bomb to a pro-war activist.

    Thanks for the information about Ukrainian journalists critical of the authorities. I'll check them out for sure. But I find the idea that in Russia people are free to criticize the Kremlin just as long as they are more extremist than the Kremlin itself more than questionable. There has just been a coup attempt and some of the Russian sources I followed during the events (including AK) were clearly sympathetic with the attempt to overthrow the regime, which is by no means surprising considering how viciously they had been attacking the Kremlin. Is there any equivalent of this in Ukraine? Who would be the Ukrainian counterpart of Strelkov (who has just founded an anti-Kremlin political movement at war time)?

    Now, this doesn't mean that in Russia you cannot be poisoned or suicided and that part of the tolerance of dissent may be just due to low state capacity but from where I stand, I think that what AK once said about Russia having in practical terms more freedom of expression than many modern Western countries looks true.

    Anyway, Zelensky just received Greta in Kiev... What's next? Dylan Mulvaney? Lia Thomas? A BLM delegation? Is there no depth he's unwilling to fall to in order to garner the support of all the worst elements of Western societies?

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @AP

    Anyway, Zelensky just received Greta in Kiev

    Zelensky is in the fight for Ukraine’s existence and you are whining about Greta. Lol.

    Besides, she supports nuclear now so she is growing up and getting smarter:

    https://www.euronews.com/green/2022/10/12/greta-thunberg-on-nuclear-and-why-its-completely-insane-we-arent-talking-about-energy-savi

    Zelensky also welcomed Mike Pence.

    • Thanks: Mr. XYZ
    • Replies: @A123
    @AP


    Zelensky also welcomed Mike Pence.
     
    OMG

    Wow!!!!

    We know that Zelensky hates Judeo-Christian values. He actually welcomed Judas "The Betrayer" Pence, known enemy of America and the Constitution?

    Is Zelensky planning on rigging Ukrainian elections like Pence did in 2020?

    Oh... Wait... That is not it... Zelensky has nationalized the media, banned opposition parties, and abolished elections. All reasons why Judas Pence backs the depravity of Kiev aggression.

    #LetsGoBrandon 😇
    , @QCIC
    @AP

    Zelensky is the poster child for a long drawn out Western attack on Russia. His creators like to show him with a bunch of other poster children since this builds the brand.

    It will be interesting but sad to see how they mold Greta's image as she gets older. Her parents are creeps.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

  887. @Mr. Hack
    @songbird

    How many Irish do you suppose are actually redheads? I've certainly met a few such examples (including a Ukrainian/Irish mix). Here's a photo of a beautiful Ukrainian redhead, of which there are more than a few examples:

    https://i.imgur.com/Em8C83h.jpg
    Alina Kovalenko.

    Replies: @Coconuts, @Greasy William, @songbird, @Mr. XYZ

    Iirc Scotland has the most redheads, then Ireland is somewhere with Udmurts people in terms of the number. I might be wrong, just going from what I can remember.

    Many redheads wherever they are found seem to resemble each other in some way.

    • Replies: @QCIC
    @Coconuts

    Red hair?

    Replies: @Coconuts

    , @Wokechoke
    @Coconuts

    The Outer hebrides is the core of the the Phenotype. There are pockets in Norway too.

  888. @Anatoly Karlin
    @Ivashka the fool

    As I said before, I know with 100% certainty that it was a drug-induced suicide.

    You can read the investigation yourself: https://vk.com/@czartv-smert-egora-prosvirnina-rassledovanie-carskogo-televideniya

    Nobody in Prosvirnin's circle of family, friends, and close acquaintances (many of whom are strongly oppositionist) claims otherwise, including his widow and mother.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @Sher Singh, @Mr. XYZ

    Off-topic, but in regards to this post of yours:

    “Reasonable thread on affirmative action. Elites with a stake in the success of the American project need all racial groups to feel invested in it. Allowing social mobility elevators (universities) to be dominated by Asian test-taking maximizers isn’t optimal way to go about it.”

    Why exactly can’t economic-based affirmative action achieve the same goal? It would also be more useful at helping poorer minorities relative to race-based affirmative action, which might be more likely to help wealthier minorities.

    Also, by that logic, would you acknowledge that Jewish quotas can be justified (in the name of equity) if they are necessary to make gentile whites feel like they have a greater stake in the system, as in the late Soviet Union or in the early 20th century US and Eastern Europe?

    As a side note, this shows the total delusion of those open borders folks like Bryan Caplan who think that the West can do open borders while denying citizenship, voting rights, and social safety net access to immigrants and their descendants for an indefinite number of generations. Why exactly would immigrants and their descendants actually be willing to permanently tolerate this in any reasonably free and democratic country, after all?

  889. AP says:
    @Gerard1234
    @AP

    LMAO. As is expected, this fantasist, fuckwit lowlife who has never been to Ukraine, Russia, Europe, and possibly even outside of its mother's basement........ is that pitiful it blindly ( or probably for deliberate disinformation purposes) links some article , that only further shows this idiot doesn't speak a word of Ukrainian or Russian.....it proves EXACTLY what I was saying.


    Of course , Ivan Sirko "sure" ukrop nationalists from the west are going to name place after him! That "typical", ancient ukrop word of "Lemburg", LMAO. That typical ukrainian letter of W featured in several of these names you dumb fuck! As I said, this idiot disseminates filth he hasn't even read or certainly doesn't understand.

    As can be deciphered after about 10 seconds of looking through this fantasists BS, there is not even ONE village, before we even get to town which is "Ukrainian".

    What we have are predominantly - Poles or Russian names of places you retard. You would think a useless scumbag as yourself would stay far away from the word "mir" given one of your other plentiful disasters exposing yourself involving that word.....but we are dealing with a sociopathic scumtroll here.

    We do have places named after settlers ( that's completely different you dumb prick, even for ukronazis, expecting all of them to be useless is naive) for what they have done in Canada.......and if as they emigrated they even viewed themselves as "Ukrainian" is highly unlikely

    St. Vladimir Catholic Elementary School - LOL, where to start with this? Uniate heretic faggots using Vladimir the Great for Catholic purposes...oh...and that its Vladimir not Volodomyr

    So with out any actual places, this retard is forced into pitifully having this link that is reduced to "localities", literally a place where somebody has taken a shit in an open field, and had some 1940s-50s highly insecure banderatard falsely edit them onto a wikipedia page to classify these nonexistent places based on this puddle and shit in a field. I clicked on 3 of them, and of course NONE of them were actually called what this fake BS on wikipedia links them as.

    School district, WTF? How pathetic is this.

    Odessa, Krim, a million other clearly Polish places. As seen in this retards idiotic discussion with the excellent Beckow about nobility, he links deliberate fake BS that in zero way supports his lie.....and it just shows how dumb the retards who linked to it are.

    And where is the US, on this list? Interesting in that this sack of shit being American is about the only thing not false about this freak. Normally this freak invents a fake relative to "support" his fake argument, but with this he can't even fake a Canadian he knows living in these so-called diaspora areas.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @AP

    LMAO. As is expected, this fantasis

    You were caught posting from some post-industrial shithole in northern England. The worst place to live in England. What a loser. I guess a Sovok untermensch “civil engineer” is good for cleaning an abandoned factory.

    How is life among the Pakistani gangs? Do they appreciate your gender fluidity (you have admitted it)?

    It’s funny how much you wrote, when you were shown to be an ignorant moron as usual.

    Since you insist, we will continue the lesson.

    In North America, place names come from the first settlers. Ukrainians came to North America in the late 19th century. By that time, most places were already long-settled. In the USA, most Ukrainians came to New York, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Ohio, Chicago, Michigan. These places had been settled and named for hundreds of years. So there are probably no Ukrainian place names in the USA.

    But in the Canadian prairies, Ukrainians were often the first settlers. So that is where the Ukrainian place names are.

    For example, Ukraina, Manitoba:

    https://roadsidethoughts.com/mb/ukraina-profile.htm

    You claim people who didn’t think they were Ukrainian would name a place Ukraina?

    A Canadian government source with some more Ukrainian place names:

    https://www.communitystories.ca/v1/pm_v2.php?id=story_line&lg=English&fl=0&ex=00000464&sl=5522&pos=1

    A resident of Ukraina in Manitoba (near Dauphin) tells how, in 1897, a group of Ukrainian immigrants settled on virgin territory some 200 miles from Winnipeg. Once established, the immigrants met to agree on the geographic name to be given the settlement. A proposal that the new settlement bear the name “Ukraina” out of respect for their native land won general agreement. The next step was a letter to Ottawa with a request that the name be officially registered. A request that the near-by railway station be called Dnipro was also forwarded at the same time. The government agreed to the request for Ukraina but rejected the other request with the explanation that there was already a community named Dnipro in Saskatchewan. That is how the first place name ”Ukraina” appeared in Canada. Altogether there are three – one in each of the western provinces. Place names borrowed from the homeland also crop up in names like Halicz, Zbaraz. Komarno, Seech, Dnieper, Poltava, Ternopol, Luzan, Sniatyn, Sokal, Kiev, Boian, Jaroslaw, Stry, Shepenge, Dniester, Zbruch, Prut, Karpati, and others.

    :::::::::::::::::

    If you knew something about Slavic languages, you would know that Ukrainian uses the Cyrillic alphabet. This alphabet is different from the Latin one. Did you know, idiot-Gerard, that Polish is a Slavic languages and that it uses the Latin alphabet?

    When Ukrainians came to North America they often uses Latin letters as Poles do. So “v” becomes “w,” “ch” becomes “cz.” This occurred with surnames and some place names.

    Here is from the Canadian Encyclopedia:

    https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/timeline/ukrainian-canadian-history

    “In 1892, a small group of immigrants organized by Ivan Pylypow”

    Note the “w.”

    That is why there is a town in Canada called “Slawa.”

    It has a Ukrainian Orthodox cemetery:

    https://www.findagrave.com/cemetery/2578461/saint-mary’s-ukrainian-orthodox-cemetery

    • Thanks: Mr. XYZ
    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @AP

    Question for you, AP: Do you think that the Ukrainian diaspora worldwide would have been larger without the World Wars? Apparently WWI stopped the mass wave of Galician emigration and it never returned to its pre-war levels:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Galicia_(Eastern_Europe)


    Beginning in the 1880s, a mass emigration of the Galician peasantry occurred. The emigration started as a seasonal one to Imperial Germany (newly unified and economically dynamic) and to Bosnia and then later became a Trans-Atlantic one with large-scale emigration to the United States, Brazil, and Canada.

    Caused by the backward economic condition of Galicia where rural poverty was widespread, the emigration began in the western, Polish populated part of Galicia and quickly shifted east to the Ukrainian inhabited parts. Poles, Ukrainians, Jews, and Germans all participated in this mass movement of countryfolk and villagers. Poles migrated principally to New England and the midwestern states of the United States, but also to Brazil and elsewhere; Ukrainians migrated to Brazil, Canada, and the United States, with a very intense emigration from Southern Podolia to Western Canada; and Jews emigrated both directly to the New World and also indirectly via other parts of Austria-Hungary.

    A total of several hundred thousand people were involved in this Great Economic Emigration which grew steadily more intense until the outbreak of the First World War in 1914. The war put a temporary halt to the emigration which never again reached the same proportions.

    The Great Economic Emigration, especially the emigration to Brazil – the "Brazilian Fever" as it was called at the time – was described in contemporary literary works by the Polish poet Maria Konopnicka, the Ukrainian writer Ivan Franko, and many others. Writer Osyp Oleskiv was instrumental in redirecting Ukrainian migration away from Brazil towards Canada, although the first arrival, Ivan Pylypiv, had been a few years earlier.
     
    Seems like Russian Ukraine was too oppressive to attract many of these migrants. Though interestingly enough, some Czechs did move to Volhynia in the 19th and early 20th centuries:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Czechs_in_Ukraine

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/86/Czech1897ua.png

    In theory, in the event of a WWI victory, Austria-Hungary could have sought to expand into Volhynia in order to incorporate the Czechs there. But I don't think that this was ever actually considered.

    Replies: @AP

    , @Mr. Hack
    @AP

    I know that there's a small town in Minnesota called "Mazeppa" Just for the heck of it, I tried researching the old palamar (now, I'm the old palamar, but in AZ. :-) ), that I mentioned above. I couldn't directly locate him, but I did locate some information about a family that moved to Mazeppa from Connecticut that also carried the surname "Lymon". An Orthodox priest too that was Ukrainian with the Lymon surname. It's a small world after all...

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/76/WalnutStreetBridgeMazeppaMN.jpg/800px-WalnutStreetBridgeMazeppaMN.jpg
    The Walnut Street Bridge over the North Fork of the Zumbro River in Mazeppa, Minnesota, United States, listed on the National Register of Historic Places

    I've driven past several times and stopped within on a business trip in the area. In case you're interested they even have a Wikipedia entry:


    Mazeppa was platted in 1855, and named in honor of Hetman Ivan Mazepa via a poem by Lord Byron.[5][6] The first census was taken in 1860, it showed 534 residents. The town was incorporated in 1877.[5] Mazeppa in its early years was a flour milling center and boasted 7 trains a day at its peak.
     
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mazeppa,_Minnesota
    , @Dmitry
    @AP


    post-industrial shithole in northern England
     
    Maybe there are some better experts here, but I don't think Northern England is some kind of postindustrial dystopia, without modern companies or advanced jobs for engineers.

    It's unsuccessful compared to London, but in the global perspective these are still cities with relatively modern economy and they part of one of the most booming countries for future industries.*

    For comparison, within the EU, Tallin attains as the most successful postcommunist city from viewpoint of future economy or hi-tech funding. Manchester a small city in Northern England, has more unicorns than Tallin, larger enterprise value than Tallin.

    -

    "Startup ecosystem" consultancies, according to them, higher ranking cities are part of Northern regions like Manchester, Edinburgh, Newcastle upon Tyne, Birmingham, Leeds.


    https://i.imgur.com/LwSFb7R.jpg

    -

    *For the global context, if recent funding boom would indicate, United Kingdom in 2022 receives 55% of public venture capital as China, more than India and France. There is a lot of boom to the future industries. Maybe not compared to New England or California, but excluding America it is a boom.

    https://i.imgur.com/tRlVvTp.jpg

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @AP

    , @Gerard1234
    @AP


    You were caught posting from some post-industrial shithole in northern England. The worst place to live in England. What a loser. I guess a Sovok untermensch “civil engineer” is good for cleaning an abandoned factory.
     
    LMAO. An amusing lie. Just sums up the tactics a compulsive liar sociopathic fuckwit as yourself will amusingly do.....from the gutter.


    Do they appreciate your gender fluidity (you have admitted it)?
     
    Bizarre, idiotic and of course another LIE. Mr Hack , different to you, is at least "Ukrainian" diaspora. Fantasizing about having Mr Hack's life is almost as pathetic as plagiarising his own stupid jokes on here. LOL

    How is life among the Pakistani gangs?
     
    Again, truly bizarre. Highly indicative of the fact you aren't ukrainian or have any connection to the people there, because any ACTUAL diaspora would be concerned that Pakistani gangs would have been fully involved with Ukrainain women in the last year......except probably its more the "cultured" Albanian and Polish gangs throughout Europe who are, en masse, using Ukrainian whores to service them in the brothel/human traffiking markets.

    What Pakistani gangs are in Kazan you mentally sick retard!!???

    Anyway, - Pakistani gangs as far as I know, would be UK based, and though they are also blatantly using ukrainian whores, en masse, to service them in the brothel/human traffiking markets, the UK is not the main areas for this. But Britain , despite having a huge role in creating , demographically catastrophic numbers of ukronazis dying.....is only having a relatively small amount of ukrop refugees in comparison to everyone else. From what I hear, over 50% of them are there only because they have family already in UK ( Banderetard excrement smuggled out by MI6 and post-soviet diaspora), so the Pakistani gangs are not as prolific with Galician whores as the Albanian and Polish gangs in continental Europe. This is the life their western backers have lead them too. Anyway at least they are providing entertainment to my great friend Mikel, with the beastiality and sick-stuff with dwarves that Galician whores are filming

    Also the place name goes on fonetics regrading the latin translations you retard

    Replies: @YetAnotherAnon, @AP

  890. A123 says: • Website
    @AP
    @Mikel


    Anyway, Zelensky just received Greta in Kiev
     
    Zelensky is in the fight for Ukraine's existence and you are whining about Greta. Lol.

    Besides, she supports nuclear now so she is growing up and getting smarter:

    https://www.euronews.com/green/2022/10/12/greta-thunberg-on-nuclear-and-why-its-completely-insane-we-arent-talking-about-energy-savi

    Zelensky also welcomed Mike Pence.

    Replies: @A123, @QCIC

    Zelensky also welcomed Mike Pence.

    OMG

    Wow!!!!

    We know that Zelensky hates Judeo-Christian values. He actually welcomed Judas “The Betrayer” Pence, known enemy of America and the Constitution?

    Is Zelensky planning on rigging Ukrainian elections like Pence did in 2020?

    Oh… Wait… That is not it… Zelensky has nationalized the media, banned opposition parties, and abolished elections. All reasons why Judas Pence backs the depravity of Kiev aggression.

    #LetsGoBrandon 😇

  891. @Mr. Hack
    @songbird

    How many Irish do you suppose are actually redheads? I've certainly met a few such examples (including a Ukrainian/Irish mix). Here's a photo of a beautiful Ukrainian redhead, of which there are more than a few examples:

    https://i.imgur.com/Em8C83h.jpg
    Alina Kovalenko.

    Replies: @Coconuts, @Greasy William, @songbird, @Mr. XYZ

    she is beautiful

  892. @Mr. Hack
    @songbird

    How many Irish do you suppose are actually redheads? I've certainly met a few such examples (including a Ukrainian/Irish mix). Here's a photo of a beautiful Ukrainian redhead, of which there are more than a few examples:

    https://i.imgur.com/Em8C83h.jpg
    Alina Kovalenko.

    Replies: @Coconuts, @Greasy William, @songbird, @Mr. XYZ

    Pretty.

    Would suppose it must be close to 10% of the natives in Ireland. Recessive carriers must be higher, and account for the very pale skin you often see even among the dark-haired. The Western shore is a very cloudy place.

    [MORE]

    I knew a lot of redheads in school with Irish blood.

    You would think “Red” wouldn’t be a very good nickname in Ireland, but there were many men mentioned in the annals with it, like Owen Roe O’Neill.

    Have always felt an affinity for the reds (phenotypic) of Eastern Europe.

    IIRC, sudden death said the Udmurts would attack me, and not make me their king and not select their most attractive sisters for my harem. Of course, he is full of it.

    • Replies: @sudden death
    @songbird


    IIRC, sudden death said the Udmurts would attack me, and not make me their king and not select their most attractive sisters for my harem. Of course, he is full of it.
     
    No, it wasn't me, never did slander the poor vanishing Udmurts;)
  893. @AP
    @Gerard1234


    LMAO. As is expected, this fantasis
     
    You were caught posting from some post-industrial shithole in northern England. The worst place to live in England. What a loser. I guess a Sovok untermensch "civil engineer" is good for cleaning an abandoned factory.

    How is life among the Pakistani gangs? Do they appreciate your gender fluidity (you have admitted it)?

    It's funny how much you wrote, when you were shown to be an ignorant moron as usual.

    Since you insist, we will continue the lesson.

    In North America, place names come from the first settlers. Ukrainians came to North America in the late 19th century. By that time, most places were already long-settled. In the USA, most Ukrainians came to New York, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Ohio, Chicago, Michigan. These places had been settled and named for hundreds of years. So there are probably no Ukrainian place names in the USA.

    But in the Canadian prairies, Ukrainians were often the first settlers. So that is where the Ukrainian place names are.

    For example, Ukraina, Manitoba:

    https://roadsidethoughts.com/mb/ukraina-profile.htm

    You claim people who didn't think they were Ukrainian would name a place Ukraina?

    A Canadian government source with some more Ukrainian place names:

    https://www.communitystories.ca/v1/pm_v2.php?id=story_line&lg=English&fl=0&ex=00000464&sl=5522&pos=1

    A resident of Ukraina in Manitoba (near Dauphin) tells how, in 1897, a group of Ukrainian immigrants settled on virgin territory some 200 miles from Winnipeg. Once established, the immigrants met to agree on the geographic name to be given the settlement. A proposal that the new settlement bear the name "Ukraina" out of respect for their native land won general agreement. The next step was a letter to Ottawa with a request that the name be officially registered. A request that the near-by railway station be called Dnipro was also forwarded at the same time. The government agreed to the request for Ukraina but rejected the other request with the explanation that there was already a community named Dnipro in Saskatchewan. That is how the first place name ''Ukraina" appeared in Canada. Altogether there are three - one in each of the western provinces. Place names borrowed from the homeland also crop up in names like Halicz, Zbaraz. Komarno, Seech, Dnieper, Poltava, Ternopol, Luzan, Sniatyn, Sokal, Kiev, Boian, Jaroslaw, Stry, Shepenge, Dniester, Zbruch, Prut, Karpati, and others.

    :::::::::::::::::

    If you knew something about Slavic languages, you would know that Ukrainian uses the Cyrillic alphabet. This alphabet is different from the Latin one. Did you know, idiot-Gerard, that Polish is a Slavic languages and that it uses the Latin alphabet?

    When Ukrainians came to North America they often uses Latin letters as Poles do. So "v" becomes "w," "ch" becomes "cz." This occurred with surnames and some place names.

    Here is from the Canadian Encyclopedia:

    https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/timeline/ukrainian-canadian-history

    "In 1892, a small group of immigrants organized by Ivan Pylypow"

    Note the "w."

    That is why there is a town in Canada called "Slawa."

    It has a Ukrainian Orthodox cemetery:

    https://www.findagrave.com/cemetery/2578461/saint-mary's-ukrainian-orthodox-cemetery

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Mr. Hack, @Dmitry, @Gerard1234

    Question for you, AP: Do you think that the Ukrainian diaspora worldwide would have been larger without the World Wars? Apparently WWI stopped the mass wave of Galician emigration and it never returned to its pre-war levels:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Galicia_(Eastern_Europe)

    Beginning in the 1880s, a mass emigration of the Galician peasantry occurred. The emigration started as a seasonal one to Imperial Germany (newly unified and economically dynamic) and to Bosnia and then later became a Trans-Atlantic one with large-scale emigration to the United States, Brazil, and Canada.

    Caused by the backward economic condition of Galicia where rural poverty was widespread, the emigration began in the western, Polish populated part of Galicia and quickly shifted east to the Ukrainian inhabited parts. Poles, Ukrainians, Jews, and Germans all participated in this mass movement of countryfolk and villagers. Poles migrated principally to New England and the midwestern states of the United States, but also to Brazil and elsewhere; Ukrainians migrated to Brazil, Canada, and the United States, with a very intense emigration from Southern Podolia to Western Canada; and Jews emigrated both directly to the New World and also indirectly via other parts of Austria-Hungary.

    A total of several hundred thousand people were involved in this Great Economic Emigration which grew steadily more intense until the outbreak of the First World War in 1914. The war put a temporary halt to the emigration which never again reached the same proportions.

    The Great Economic Emigration, especially the emigration to Brazil – the “Brazilian Fever” as it was called at the time – was described in contemporary literary works by the Polish poet Maria Konopnicka, the Ukrainian writer Ivan Franko, and many others. Writer Osyp Oleskiv was instrumental in redirecting Ukrainian migration away from Brazil towards Canada, although the first arrival, Ivan Pylypiv, had been a few years earlier.

    Seems like Russian Ukraine was too oppressive to attract many of these migrants. Though interestingly enough, some Czechs did move to Volhynia in the 19th and early 20th centuries:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Czechs_in_Ukraine

    In theory, in the event of a WWI victory, Austria-Hungary could have sought to expand into Volhynia in order to incorporate the Czechs there. But I don’t think that this was ever actually considered.

    • Replies: @AP
    @Mr. XYZ


    Question for you, AP: Do you think that the Ukrainian diaspora worldwide would have been larger without the World Wars? Apparently WWI stopped the mass wave of Galician emigration and it never returned to its pre-war levels
     
    Certainly. If not for World War I, the three Canadian Prairie provinces would have been 1/4 or 1/3 Ukrainian, instead of 10% Ukrainian. Given high Ukrainian organizational capacity, they would have probably dominated those provinces.

    OTOH this would have made the Polish position in Galicia stronger, because Ukrainians wee emigrating at a higher rate than Poles were.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

  894. @Mr. Hack
    @songbird

    How many Irish do you suppose are actually redheads? I've certainly met a few such examples (including a Ukrainian/Irish mix). Here's a photo of a beautiful Ukrainian redhead, of which there are more than a few examples:

    https://i.imgur.com/Em8C83h.jpg
    Alina Kovalenko.

    Replies: @Coconuts, @Greasy William, @songbird, @Mr. XYZ

  895. @Mr. XYZ
    @Dmitry

    Do you have a source for the first part, please?

    Fertility rate is not *easily* changed but it can theoretically be done. For instance, ex-USSR Jews after moving to Israel.

    I'm arguing against Anatoly Karlin's arguments in favor of Russia attacking Ukraine. Though maybe the kremlins have never considered such arguments. Not sure.

    As for economies of scale, here you go:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economies_of_scale

    Replies: @Dmitry

    This is the completed fertility by birth cohort. As you can see, fertility rate in Germany is below replacement (which is a higher than 2,1 in this epoch), for the 1930s. It rises to replacement for cohorts of women born after 1926 (parents of the baby boomers).

    economies of scale, here you go:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economies_of_scale

    This article is about companies in microeconomics. It doesn’t say countries should prioritize increasing population. That is not the correct understanding of the terminology.

    As for the ideal population size for countries, I’m sure there are better resources for discussing this theme, but we could return again to the world happiness report. Except Netherlands, the top countries have populations around 10 million or less. https://edition.cnn.com/travel/article/world-happiest-countries-2023-wellness/index.html Iceland is less than 400,000 people, Luxembourg is less than 700,000 people.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @Dmitry

    Do you remember what article that chart is from?

    In any case, the completed cohort fertility in Israel is always much higher than 2, even only for Jews.


    This article is about companies in microeconomics. It doesn’t say countries should prioritize increasing population. That is not the correct understanding of the terminology.
     
    But don't larger countries sometimes allow for larger companies, supply chains, corporations, et cetera?

    Anyway, why don't you ask Anatoly Karlin to fully elaborate on this concept?

    As for the ideal population size for countries, I’m sure there are better resources for discussing this theme, but we could return again to the world happiness report. Except Netherlands, the top countries have populations around 10 million or less. https://edition.cnn.com/travel/article/world-happiest-countries-2023-wellness/index.html Iceland is less than 400,000 people, Luxembourg is less than 700,000 people.

     

    Very true, but the countries above that are a part of the EU allow one to have a great quality of life while still being a part of a world-power. Finland, Denmark, Netherlands, Sweden, Norway, Luxembourg. And if one goes further down the list, Austria, Ireland, Germany, Belgium, Czech Republic, Lithuania. And of course the United States is a world-power in its own right.

    Replies: @Dmitry

    , @AP
    @Dmitry


    As for the ideal population size for countries, I’m sure there are better resources for discussing this theme, but we could return again to the world happiness report.
     
    It defines happiness in a way that is not actually happiness:

    https://edition.cnn.com/travel/article/world-happiest-countries-2023-wellness/index.html

    healthy life expectancy, GDP per capita, social support, low corruption, generosity in a community where people look after each other and freedom to make key life decisions.

    These are nice things, and they are common in Scandinavia. But I don't think that of the Scandinavian countries united into one, that the ranking would decline.

    Lithuania made the top 20. It is probably a nice country, but are Lithuanians particularly happy?

    Are Finns very happy people? Their country is the "happiest."

    But Finland has the 9th highest rate of depression in the world, Lithuania the 10th:

    https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/depression-rates-by-country

    Lithuania has the 15th highest suicide rate, Finland 38th out of 183 countries:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_suicide_rate
  896. @Mikel
    @John Johnson


    Yes I have watched Putin’s Jewish propagandist many times.
     
    No, you haven't, and I doubt you had even heard of him before I mentioned his name to you. You're coming back with the well publicized and irrelevant story about his hypocrisy as if my point was about his personal integrity rather than the lively debates even boomer Russians are accustomed to watch, let alone the Telegram generation.

    If you had anything of interest to say, you wouldn't be repeating the silly American boomer trope that Russia is some kind of North Korea with no freedom of speech, as if that was the problem with Russia, of all the many things one could criticize the criminal Kremlin for. More than the splitting image of McGregor, you come across like the splitting image of Alex Jones, who rather than focus on the many winning conservative points like open borders or child sex surgery, focuses his energies on Pizzagates and Sandy Hook nonsense.

    Replies: @John Johnson, @Dmitry, @silviosilver

    This is the pseudo-open discussion.

    I’m not certain about this question in either direction, but it’s possible it’s not impossible pseudodemocracy is even more damaging for the general culture and politics, than a more closed discussion e.g. Stalin times.

    If I would copy paste my answer about this a few months ago where I was talking about this with user LatW.

    Life in the country with model of “pseudodemocracy” politics, is probably usually better than in most of the autocracy societies.

    But pseudodemocracy was an experiment of those years 1991-2022 and how was the result for the general culture?

    If you know these toys.

    In pseudodemocracy, the children sit in the toy car or toy boat. The toy car make some kinds of noises and movement, so the child believes they are controlling it.

    Children also add their imagination so they can act like they are controllers. Even though they don’t really believe this. It’s a kind of border between imagination and reality for the children.

    In 1991-2022, after time the children could stop playing. So, the managers of the toys are have incentive for adding more loud noises, more exciting movements to the game.

    In traditional autocracy, they usually put the children in a quiet room and lock the door. It’s the same result, so the children don’t move.

    Is it better for psychology health locked in a room, or sitting in noisy, stimulating version of the toy car, imagining you are moving?

    In both situations, children don’t move. In some ways, you can prefer the calm quiet television in Soviet times. There was still negative effects for the culture. But it was different than the noise and distraction that is required for managing children in the pseudodemocracy.

    I think there are already some of the difference with Belarus. Lukashenko is not from the KGB training. He doesn’t flood the culture so much with decoys and distraction.

    Media in Belarus is relatively more calm, without so many games. It’s possible after 2022, in Russia it is already becoming more like Belarus. For many people, this change feels positively.

  897. AP says:
    @Mikel
    @John Johnson


    You Putin defenders are terrible at verifying anything.
     
    Are you just incapable of using anything but loser arguments? Unlike you, I don't defend any of the two Eastern Slavic warring dwarfs. You just pile on repetitive stuff about one dwarf while kissing the other dwarf's bottom. The one who lies through his teeth in order to get you and your family in a world war.

    Btw, the only two Putin defenders left here are Gerard and Mikhail. All the rest are gone. Are you really posting here your MSM lines in order to win over two commenters?

    Replies: @AP

    Btw, the only two Putin defenders left here are Gerard and Mikhail

    There are also QCIC and the LondonBob guy, who writes sporadically. AnoninTN may come back.

    The funny thing is that the anti-Putin guys are more connected to Russia than the pro-Putin guys. Mikhail doesn’t even speak Russian, despite being of Russian descent. One would think that he would at least have bothered learning the language. I at least speak it well enough to get mistaken for a tourist from the near abroad such as Poland, Latvia, or Czechia (I have gotten such questions – I was never was mistaken for a Ukrainian when speaking Russian in Moscow, they probably assume Ukrainians speak better Russian than I do). Gerard lives in a shithole in northern industrial England. I last visited Moscow in 2019. I suspect he hasn’t been back as recently.

    BTW, if he lies that I was never in Russia, I did meet our former host in Moscow, as he confirmed:

    https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-40/

    (looking at the the archived posts from that month, highlighted the high quality of this blog when it was active, thanks to Karlin)

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @AP


    The funny thing is that the anti-Putin guys are more connected to Russia than the pro-Putin guys.
     
    I myself speak Russian. It's my first language. I never actually lived in Russia, with me being born in Israel to ex-USSR immigrant parents who have then just recently moved there and living there until moving to the US with my family at age 8, slightly over 20 years ago, where I have lived ever since. I was neutral-to-positive on Putin prior to the current war. I disliked his likely assassinations of Russian opposition figures, obviously, but I feared that the Russian deep state could still try engaging in such behavior even without him and that whoever replaces him might be worse for the Russian people economically-wise relative to him. But of course the current Ukrainian war have completely changed and transformed my attitudes towards Putin in a much more negative light. He's essentially a milder version of Hitler (cultural genocide rather than physical genocide) at this point in time.

    Replies: @QCIC

    , @Mikel
    @AP


    There are also QCIC and the LondonBob guy, who writes sporadically.
     
    True. It's four Putin supporters left rather than just two. Still, a big waste of energy by JJ. Perhaps I shouldn't have gone so hard on him though. I think it's just that seeing the clip of Greta meeting Zelensky put me in a real bad mood and I haven't found anyone in real life to vent my frustration with.

    Replies: @AP

    , @QCIC
    @AP

    QCIC = "The Anti-Nuclear War Guy"

    I don't claim to have any deep understanding of Russian, Ukrainian or USA geopolitics. In my opinion many of the important driving forces are apparently obscured from view.

    I stand by the idea that Ukraine is a pawn being used against Russia by the West. I don't think this conclusion is really controversial for you people. I accept that for emotional reasons some people see this conflict as your "best shot" to secure a Ukrainian homeland. While I understand this perspective, I think you are deeply and dangerously mistaken on the overall picture.

    I have written that I consider Putin to be an impressive world leader who is able to respond to questions which would turn Western politicians into jello. So he evokes the image of what I thought a Statesman should be when I was younger and more naive. None of the US presidents back through Ford were capable of an intelligent conversation with the man. Nixon might have been OK, but his time was before my awareness on this topic. This doesn't mean I like Putin, but I respect his skill.

    , @Mikhail
    @AP

    Prominent Ukrainian-American activist Lev Dobriansky didn't speak Ukrainian. Mercouris, Kissinger, Mearsheimer and a number of other foreign policy hands don't speak Russian. In that category, numerous fluent Russian speakers in academia, media and body politic value the input of such folks. Fluent linguists don't necessarily make for good analytical minds.

    Replies: @AP, @Emil Nikola Richard

  898. @Dmitry
    @Mr. XYZ

    This is the completed fertility by birth cohort. As you can see, fertility rate in Germany is below replacement (which is a higher than 2,1 in this epoch), for the 1930s. It rises to replacement for cohorts of women born after 1926 (parents of the baby boomers).

    https://i.imgur.com/e7JHMIS.jpg

    economies of scale, here you go:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economies_of_scale
     

    This article is about companies in microeconomics. It doesn't say countries should prioritize increasing population. That is not the correct understanding of the terminology.

    As for the ideal population size for countries, I'm sure there are better resources for discussing this theme, but we could return again to the world happiness report. Except Netherlands, the top countries have populations around 10 million or less. https://edition.cnn.com/travel/article/world-happiest-countries-2023-wellness/index.html Iceland is less than 400,000 people, Luxembourg is less than 700,000 people.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @AP

    Do you remember what article that chart is from?

    In any case, the completed cohort fertility in Israel is always much higher than 2, even only for Jews.

    This article is about companies in microeconomics. It doesn’t say countries should prioritize increasing population. That is not the correct understanding of the terminology.

    But don’t larger countries sometimes allow for larger companies, supply chains, corporations, et cetera?

    Anyway, why don’t you ask Anatoly Karlin to fully elaborate on this concept?

    As for the ideal population size for countries, I’m sure there are better resources for discussing this theme, but we could return again to the world happiness report. Except Netherlands, the top countries have populations around 10 million or less. https://edition.cnn.com/travel/article/world-happiest-countries-2023-wellness/index.html Iceland is less than 400,000 people, Luxembourg is less than 700,000 people.

    Very true, but the countries above that are a part of the EU allow one to have a great quality of life while still being a part of a world-power. Finland, Denmark, Netherlands, Sweden, Norway, Luxembourg. And if one goes further down the list, Austria, Ireland, Germany, Belgium, Czech Republic, Lithuania. And of course the United States is a world-power in its own right.

    • Replies: @Dmitry
    @Mr. XYZ


    what article that chart is from?

     

    It's from this article.
    http://piketty.pse.ens.fr/files/Guinnane2011.pdf

    In any case, the completed cohort fertility in Israel
     
    I'm not sure the relevance of this to topic of the below replacement fertility rates in Nazi Germany.

    larger countries sometimes allow for larger companies, supply chains, corporations, et cetera?

    Anyway, why don’t you ask Anatoly Karlin to fully elaborate on this concept
     
    I'm not sure his relation is to this topic.

    Larger countries are larger market for companies which are selling products. But a lot of companies are exporters, especially if they are able to be internationally competitive for price or quality.

    For example, Kia sell 18% of their products in South Korea, which is the local market, limited by the local population and income. But the 82% of their products are sold in an international market.

    Often the multinational companies, are also based in smaller countries. For example, Dublin and Amsterdam are the most competitive in Europe for incorporating of your company. From perspective of living, Dublin is even one of the most boring area of Europe, but local government is friendly there.

    but the countries above that are a part of the EU allow one to have a great quality of life while still being a part of a world-power. Finland, Denmark, Netherlands, Sweden, Norway, Luxembourg.
     
    I don't think "being part of a world power" is important for most citizens. Is it tragedy for Norway or Switzerland's citizens they are not part of the EU?

    I would guess some of those countries, they pay less taxes as their defense is managed by the larger neighbors. But this is not true for Switzerland. Israel has very high tax levels, with a lot of unpleasant obligations related to defense.

    There is probably something related to incentive of government to respond to the priorities of the citizens, which is easier when the population is smaller, or at least not multiple tens of millions. Or it's easier for the population to control their government in the relatively smaller scale.
  899. @AP
    @Gerard1234


    LMAO. As is expected, this fantasis
     
    You were caught posting from some post-industrial shithole in northern England. The worst place to live in England. What a loser. I guess a Sovok untermensch "civil engineer" is good for cleaning an abandoned factory.

    How is life among the Pakistani gangs? Do they appreciate your gender fluidity (you have admitted it)?

    It's funny how much you wrote, when you were shown to be an ignorant moron as usual.

    Since you insist, we will continue the lesson.

    In North America, place names come from the first settlers. Ukrainians came to North America in the late 19th century. By that time, most places were already long-settled. In the USA, most Ukrainians came to New York, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Ohio, Chicago, Michigan. These places had been settled and named for hundreds of years. So there are probably no Ukrainian place names in the USA.

    But in the Canadian prairies, Ukrainians were often the first settlers. So that is where the Ukrainian place names are.

    For example, Ukraina, Manitoba:

    https://roadsidethoughts.com/mb/ukraina-profile.htm

    You claim people who didn't think they were Ukrainian would name a place Ukraina?

    A Canadian government source with some more Ukrainian place names:

    https://www.communitystories.ca/v1/pm_v2.php?id=story_line&lg=English&fl=0&ex=00000464&sl=5522&pos=1

    A resident of Ukraina in Manitoba (near Dauphin) tells how, in 1897, a group of Ukrainian immigrants settled on virgin territory some 200 miles from Winnipeg. Once established, the immigrants met to agree on the geographic name to be given the settlement. A proposal that the new settlement bear the name "Ukraina" out of respect for their native land won general agreement. The next step was a letter to Ottawa with a request that the name be officially registered. A request that the near-by railway station be called Dnipro was also forwarded at the same time. The government agreed to the request for Ukraina but rejected the other request with the explanation that there was already a community named Dnipro in Saskatchewan. That is how the first place name ''Ukraina" appeared in Canada. Altogether there are three - one in each of the western provinces. Place names borrowed from the homeland also crop up in names like Halicz, Zbaraz. Komarno, Seech, Dnieper, Poltava, Ternopol, Luzan, Sniatyn, Sokal, Kiev, Boian, Jaroslaw, Stry, Shepenge, Dniester, Zbruch, Prut, Karpati, and others.

    :::::::::::::::::

    If you knew something about Slavic languages, you would know that Ukrainian uses the Cyrillic alphabet. This alphabet is different from the Latin one. Did you know, idiot-Gerard, that Polish is a Slavic languages and that it uses the Latin alphabet?

    When Ukrainians came to North America they often uses Latin letters as Poles do. So "v" becomes "w," "ch" becomes "cz." This occurred with surnames and some place names.

    Here is from the Canadian Encyclopedia:

    https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/timeline/ukrainian-canadian-history

    "In 1892, a small group of immigrants organized by Ivan Pylypow"

    Note the "w."

    That is why there is a town in Canada called "Slawa."

    It has a Ukrainian Orthodox cemetery:

    https://www.findagrave.com/cemetery/2578461/saint-mary's-ukrainian-orthodox-cemetery

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Mr. Hack, @Dmitry, @Gerard1234

    I know that there’s a small town in Minnesota called “Mazeppa” Just for the heck of it, I tried researching the old palamar (now, I’m the old palamar, but in AZ. 🙂 ), that I mentioned above. I couldn’t directly locate him, but I did locate some information about a family that moved to Mazeppa from Connecticut that also carried the surname “Lymon”. An Orthodox priest too that was Ukrainian with the Lymon surname. It’s a small world after all…
    The Walnut Street Bridge over the North Fork of the Zumbro River in Mazeppa, Minnesota, United States, listed on the National Register of Historic Places

    I’ve driven past several times and stopped within on a business trip in the area. In case you’re interested they even have a Wikipedia entry:

    Mazeppa was platted in 1855, and named in honor of Hetman Ivan Mazepa via a poem by Lord Byron.[5][6] The first census was taken in 1860, it showed 534 residents. The town was incorporated in 1877.[5] Mazeppa in its early years was a flour milling center and boasted 7 trains a day at its peak.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mazeppa,_Minnesota

  900. @AP
    @Dmitry


    Putin is not nearly as bad as Nicholas II so far.
     
    Putin is not nearly as good as Nicholas II, until Nicholas’s colossal mistake of getting into World War I. Under Nicholas Russia experienced it’s silver age of culture, Stolypin’s reforms brought prosperity to much of the countryside, Russia rapidly industrialized and entered the ranks of the most industrialized powers. Nicholas’s Russia performed poorly against Japan in 1905 but by 1914 it had improved sufficiently that it had defeated both Austria-Hungary and the Ottoman Empire, while holding on vs. Germany. Compare to Putin’s Russia which is stalemating and slowly losing its grip over Ukraine.

    No ruler of Russia after Nicholas has been better than Nicholas. Lenin and Stalin killed millions of Russians in peacetime (even more than were lost during World War I), and Stalin’s mistakes versus little Germany cost tens of millions more (those two criminals squandered Russia’s meteoric rise), Khrushchev and Brezhnev and oversaw modest improvement followed by stagnation, Gorbachev and Yeltsin oversaw collapse, Putin showed decent recovery but has thrown it all away.

    For example, this invasion of Ukraine by Putin could be already as bad as the Nikolai’s war with Japan
     
    It’s worse. Not only is Putin’s war against a much smaller and weaker country, but the Russian Empire lost 43,000-70,000 dead total due to KIA, fatal wounds and disease against Japan. Despite the existence of modern medicine, Russia has managed to lose more dead versus Ukraine (full number is unknown but it was around 30,000 in December before Bakhmut and the newest offensive, so must be at least 80,000 and probably over 100,000 by now).

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    and entered the ranks of the most industrialized powers.

    Not on a per capita basis. Not anywhere close, in fact. On a total basis, possibly (due to its sheer population), but it was still behind the US, UK, and Germany.

    but by 1914 it had improved sufficiently that it had defeated both Austria-Hungary and the Ottoman Empire,

    Russia was not powerful enough to stop the Armenian Genocide, though. The smarter diplomatic move on Russia’s part would have been to offer territorial concessions to the Ottoman Empire (a return of some or all of the territories that it took from the Ottomans back in 1877-1878) in exchange for Ottoman neutrality during WWI. This would have likely prevented the Armenian Genocide (since the Ottomans would not have wanted Russian intervention) and might have kept the Straits open, which, if so, would have allowed the Western Entente Powers to send large amounts of aid to Russia, thus possibly preventing one or both Russian Revolutions in 1917 and allowing Russia to win WWI faster due to Russia not having the distraction of the Ottoman Front.

    Russia did a miserable job in WWI in maintaining order on the home front, even in comparison to other countries with a similar level of development such as Austria-Hungary, Italy, and the Ottoman Empire. Russia experienced two revolutions in the middle of WWI while none of the other three countries mentioned above did.

    No ruler of Russia after Nicholas has been better than Nicholas. Lenin and Stalin killed millions of Russians in peacetime (even more than were lost during World War I), and Stalin’s mistakes versus little Germany cost tens of millions more (those two criminals squandered Russia’s meteoric rise), Khrushchev and Brezhnev and oversaw modest improvement followed by stagnation, Gorbachev and Yeltsin oversaw collapse, Putin showed decent recovery but has thrown it all away.

    Andropov?

    Also, Gorbachev was good for the Balts and, long-term*, for Ukrainians as well. They might not have reacquired their independence without him. Less so for Russians, unfortunately.

    *Because Ukrainians still largely had a Sovok mentality post-independence (unlike the Balts), they weren’t quite sure what they were supposed to do with their independence for the next 20+ years. But thankfully this appears to be significantly changing by now.

    It’s worse. Not only is Putin’s war against a much smaller and weaker country, but the Russian Empire lost 43,000-70,000 dead total due to KIA, fatal wounds and disease against Japan. Despite the existence of modern medicine, Russia has managed to lose more dead versus Ukraine (full number is unknown but it was around 30,000 in December before Bakhmut and the newest offensive, so must be at least 80,000 and probably over 100,000 by now).

    Worth noting that Russia’s war against Japan was utterly irrelevant in the grand scheme of things. Losing south Sakhalin meant nothing to Russia long-term. Ditto for losing Manchuria.

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @Mr. XYZ

    Britain experienced the easter Rising which effectively sheered away Ireland in 1916. That's a large segment of the Home Islands as they were then understood. Also There was the Curragh Mutiny in 1913 or thereabouts. Where the protestant officers stationed and settled in Ireland rebelled.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curragh_incident


    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Easter_Rising


    Great Britain was much reduced by this trouble. Much more so than was Germany was reduced in sense.

  901. @Anatoly Karlin
    @Mr. XYZ


    What exactly makes you think that LatW (who is a woman, BTW) is a neocon?
     
    I'm aware. I was delineating a broad category; LatW is a Nazi more specifically. (On average, womyn have far better political instincts than m*noids, but there are exceptions).

    The RDK are unironic Nazis, homophobes, and misogynists.

    https://antifascist-europe.org/russia/russian-volunteer-corps-denis-whiterex-is-back-in-business/

    No normal person would associate with the scum (the only defensible if cynical form of cooperation with them from an EHC perspective would be to "utilize" them as cannon fodder against stronger regressive forces and lock up any survivors under hate crimes charges when they outlive their usefulness).

    Replies: @S, @Mr. XYZ, @Mr. XYZ

    Also, in regards to a lack of race-based affirmative action making POC stop being invested in the American project: Why exactly hasn’t this occurred in California, which has banned race-based (but not other, such as economic) affirmative action ever since the 1990s? I don’t seem to notice POC here in California being more anti-American than POC in other parts of the US are.

    An attempt to bring back race-based affirmative action in California failed by an almost 15% margin in November 2020, several months after George Floyd’s death:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_California_Proposition_16

    Whites, Native Americans, and Asians were against bringing back race-based affirmative action, Latinos were roughly evenly split, and blacks were in favor.

    It might have helped that California does practice economic affirmative action, though. So, it’s not a pure meritocracy. (Thus possibly allowing for greater upward economic mobility.)

    As a side note, would you have supported race-based/ethnicity-based affirmative action for Central Asians in Russia had Russia still kept Central Asia up to the present-day? In order to make them more invested in the Russian national project, I mean?

    And for that matter, would you agree that having the Soviet Union promote minority languages and cultures was a great way to try making minorities more attached to the Soviet national project and that the USSR’s biggest mistakes were not creating a space for Russians to do the same thing and being an economic failure?

  902. @Mikel
    @John Johnson


    Yes I have watched Putin’s Jewish propagandist many times.
     
    No, you haven't, and I doubt you had even heard of him before I mentioned his name to you. You're coming back with the well publicized and irrelevant story about his hypocrisy as if my point was about his personal integrity rather than the lively debates even boomer Russians are accustomed to watch, let alone the Telegram generation.

    If you had anything of interest to say, you wouldn't be repeating the silly American boomer trope that Russia is some kind of North Korea with no freedom of speech, as if that was the problem with Russia, of all the many things one could criticize the criminal Kremlin for. More than the splitting image of McGregor, you come across like the splitting image of Alex Jones, who rather than focus on the many winning conservative points like open borders or child sex surgery, focuses his energies on Pizzagates and Sandy Hook nonsense.

    Replies: @John Johnson, @Dmitry, @silviosilver

    More than the splitting image of McGregor, you come across like the splitting image of Alex Jones,

    It’s spitting image, not splitting. But the way you’re using it, I think you mean “mirror image.” A spitting image means an identical copy. “I know a guy who looks exactly like Rod Stewart – he’s a spitting image!” (True story, btw.) A mirror image, when referring to people, means sharing a common quality despite perhaps differing in some ways. “In their harsh totalitarian social policies, the bolsheviks were a mirror image of the nazis.”

    • Replies: @Mikel
    @silviosilver

    Thanks. It's one of those expressions I hardly ever hear in spoken language so it's difficult to figure out from memory what the correct spelling should be, for me at least. And now that you mention it, yes, mirror image is the expression I should have used from the beginning. I hope John Johnson doesn't also look like Alex Jones!

    By the way, I think you should adopt your grammar nazi role more often on this blog full of non-native English speakers. Feel free to shame me as often as you want. I will accept the punishment stoically if it serves to improve my writing skills.

    Replies: @silviosilver

  903. @Mr. XYZ
    @Dmitry

    Do you remember what article that chart is from?

    In any case, the completed cohort fertility in Israel is always much higher than 2, even only for Jews.


    This article is about companies in microeconomics. It doesn’t say countries should prioritize increasing population. That is not the correct understanding of the terminology.
     
    But don't larger countries sometimes allow for larger companies, supply chains, corporations, et cetera?

    Anyway, why don't you ask Anatoly Karlin to fully elaborate on this concept?

    As for the ideal population size for countries, I’m sure there are better resources for discussing this theme, but we could return again to the world happiness report. Except Netherlands, the top countries have populations around 10 million or less. https://edition.cnn.com/travel/article/world-happiest-countries-2023-wellness/index.html Iceland is less than 400,000 people, Luxembourg is less than 700,000 people.

     

    Very true, but the countries above that are a part of the EU allow one to have a great quality of life while still being a part of a world-power. Finland, Denmark, Netherlands, Sweden, Norway, Luxembourg. And if one goes further down the list, Austria, Ireland, Germany, Belgium, Czech Republic, Lithuania. And of course the United States is a world-power in its own right.

    Replies: @Dmitry

    what article that chart is from?

    It’s from this article.
    http://piketty.pse.ens.fr/files/Guinnane2011.pdf

    In any case, the completed cohort fertility in Israel

    I’m not sure the relevance of this to topic of the below replacement fertility rates in Nazi Germany.

    larger countries sometimes allow for larger companies, supply chains, corporations, et cetera?

    Anyway, why don’t you ask Anatoly Karlin to fully elaborate on this concept

    I’m not sure his relation is to this topic.

    Larger countries are larger market for companies which are selling products. But a lot of companies are exporters, especially if they are able to be internationally competitive for price or quality.

    For example, Kia sell 18% of their products in South Korea, which is the local market, limited by the local population and income. But the 82% of their products are sold in an international market.

    Often the multinational companies, are also based in smaller countries. For example, Dublin and Amsterdam are the most competitive in Europe for incorporating of your company. From perspective of living, Dublin is even one of the most boring area of Europe, but local government is friendly there.

    but the countries above that are a part of the EU allow one to have a great quality of life while still being a part of a world-power. Finland, Denmark, Netherlands, Sweden, Norway, Luxembourg.

    I don’t think “being part of a world power” is important for most citizens. Is it tragedy for Norway or Switzerland’s citizens they are not part of the EU?

    I would guess some of those countries, they pay less taxes as their defense is managed by the larger neighbors. But this is not true for Switzerland. Israel has very high tax levels, with a lot of unpleasant obligations related to defense.

    There is probably something related to incentive of government to respond to the priorities of the citizens, which is easier when the population is smaller, or at least not multiple tens of millions. Or it’s easier for the population to control their government in the relatively smaller scale.

  904. AP says:
    @Mr. XYZ
    @AP

    Question for you, AP: Do you think that the Ukrainian diaspora worldwide would have been larger without the World Wars? Apparently WWI stopped the mass wave of Galician emigration and it never returned to its pre-war levels:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Galicia_(Eastern_Europe)


    Beginning in the 1880s, a mass emigration of the Galician peasantry occurred. The emigration started as a seasonal one to Imperial Germany (newly unified and economically dynamic) and to Bosnia and then later became a Trans-Atlantic one with large-scale emigration to the United States, Brazil, and Canada.

    Caused by the backward economic condition of Galicia where rural poverty was widespread, the emigration began in the western, Polish populated part of Galicia and quickly shifted east to the Ukrainian inhabited parts. Poles, Ukrainians, Jews, and Germans all participated in this mass movement of countryfolk and villagers. Poles migrated principally to New England and the midwestern states of the United States, but also to Brazil and elsewhere; Ukrainians migrated to Brazil, Canada, and the United States, with a very intense emigration from Southern Podolia to Western Canada; and Jews emigrated both directly to the New World and also indirectly via other parts of Austria-Hungary.

    A total of several hundred thousand people were involved in this Great Economic Emigration which grew steadily more intense until the outbreak of the First World War in 1914. The war put a temporary halt to the emigration which never again reached the same proportions.

    The Great Economic Emigration, especially the emigration to Brazil – the "Brazilian Fever" as it was called at the time – was described in contemporary literary works by the Polish poet Maria Konopnicka, the Ukrainian writer Ivan Franko, and many others. Writer Osyp Oleskiv was instrumental in redirecting Ukrainian migration away from Brazil towards Canada, although the first arrival, Ivan Pylypiv, had been a few years earlier.
     
    Seems like Russian Ukraine was too oppressive to attract many of these migrants. Though interestingly enough, some Czechs did move to Volhynia in the 19th and early 20th centuries:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Czechs_in_Ukraine

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/86/Czech1897ua.png

    In theory, in the event of a WWI victory, Austria-Hungary could have sought to expand into Volhynia in order to incorporate the Czechs there. But I don't think that this was ever actually considered.

    Replies: @AP

    Question for you, AP: Do you think that the Ukrainian diaspora worldwide would have been larger without the World Wars? Apparently WWI stopped the mass wave of Galician emigration and it never returned to its pre-war levels

    Certainly. If not for World War I, the three Canadian Prairie provinces would have been 1/4 or 1/3 Ukrainian, instead of 10% Ukrainian. Given high Ukrainian organizational capacity, they would have probably dominated those provinces.

    OTOH this would have made the Polish position in Galicia stronger, because Ukrainians wee emigrating at a higher rate than Poles were.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @AP


    Certainly. If not for World War I, the three Canadian Prairie provinces would have been 1/4 or 1/3 Ukrainian, instead of 10% Ukrainian. Given high Ukrainian organizational capacity, they would have probably dominated those provinces.
     
    Interesting. Thank you!

    Would large numbers of Ukrainians from Russia have eventually moved to Canada in such a scenario, following their Galician co-ethnics, or would they have preferred to colonize Siberia, Central Asia, and the Russian Far East instead?


    OTOH this would have made the Polish position in Galicia stronger, because Ukrainians wee emigrating at a higher rate than Poles were.
     
    So, if Poland still eventually breaks away from Russia, if there is ever still a Russian Revolution in this scenario (possible but not guaranteed), Poland will subsequently gain all of Galicia while Romania gains Bukovina, perhaps in exchange for Poland joining the Dual Alliance of Austria-Hungary and Germany or even the Triple Alliance of Austria-Hungary, Germany, and Italy?

    BTW, did you ever take a look at Friedrich Naumann's 1915 book Mitteleuropa? Here is an English translation of it:

    https://archive.org/details/centraleurope00ashlgoog/mode/2up

    He's essentially arguing that Germany and Austria-Hungary should unite in order to form a larger economic and political unit, perhaps as a precursor to eventually creating a proto-EU. He was envisioning this in the context of a CP WWI victory.

    Also, one more question, albeit a very off-topic one: Do you think that the US would have still eventually acquired the Danish West Indies (later renamed the US Virgin Islands) without World War I? The US almost acquired them back in 1902; a tie vote in the upper house of the Danish parliament (Landst(h)ing) derailed this proposal back then; one more vote there and it would have passed. (In real life, the US finally acquired these islands in 1917 in large part as a result of WWI.)

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

  905. @Sean
    @Mr. XYZ


    Yeah, I myself support Ukraine for national self-determination and greater economies of scale reasons. Ukraine is better off tying itself to a larger and more successful West/EU (much more elite science production and R & D spending) than to a smaller and less successful Russia. I think that it’s the economies of scale (larger future West/EU) argument that is the most appealing to intelligent Westerners in explaining why they should care more about Russian aggression in Ukraine
     
    That sounds like the ostensibly economic reform ideas of onetime designated successor to Yeltsin, Boris Nemtsov, but he had ulterior motives. According to America's Ambassador in Moscow Michael McFaul, in private Nemtsov advocated making Ukraine thoroughly western as a way of getting Putin removed from power. That was physicist Nemtsov's theory anyway. As far as I can see US moves over Ukraine have entrenched Putin in power and made him aware of the weakness of his conventional armed forces, damaged the prestige of his generals and their ability to restrain him. and attrited the army considerably, which makes him much more dependent on his thermonuclear arsenal--and able to be quick on the draw with it with little input from the Russian military chary of nuke first use.

    A Greater Russia would have probably had less global influence than a hypothetical confederation of Japan and South Korea
     

    The attempt to deny Russia any sphere of influence at all led to it crossing borders, annexing territory, and presenting US statecraft with a series of difficult problems, in addition to altering the terms of trade (paying more for raw materials), and causing all sorts of trouble in domestic politics such as Ukrainegate and Biden being unable to let Ukraine stop fighting without huge international loss of American prestige. The Western world would have been better off keeping its nose out of Ukraine, and ignored the geopolitical 'experts' who thought there was anything to be gained by:- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-WWdE1_RW0

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Mr. XYZ

    The attempt to deny Russia any sphere of influence at all led to it crossing borders, annexing territory, and presenting US statecraft with a series of difficult problems, in addition to altering the terms of trade (paying more for raw materials), and causing all sorts of trouble in domestic politics such as Ukrainegate and Biden being unable to let Ukraine stop fighting without huge international loss of American prestige. The Western world would have been better off keeping its nose out of Ukraine, and ignored the geopolitical ‘experts’ who thought there was anything to be gained by:-

    The West was arguably prepared to give Russia a sphere of influence over Central Asia. But Russia didn’t want that. Russia wanted Ukraine (and Belarus).

    As for a harm reduction perspective, if one applies it, then sure, the West should have surrendered Ukraine to Russia, especially back in 2013-2014. However, the same logic and perspective if applied consistently would also mean having Russia surrender Serbia to Austria-Hungary back in 1914 and having the Anglo-French surrender Poland and/or the Baltic countries to Nazi Germany so that the Anglo-French can successfully secure an anti-Nazi Soviet alliance.

    • Replies: @Sean
    @Mr. XYZ


    The West was arguably prepared to give Russia a sphere of influence over Central Asia. But Russia didn’t want that. Russia wanted Ukraine ...
     
    Under Yeltsin, Russia was fobbed off when it tried to join Nato. The same thing happened when Putin asked if Russia could join Nato. Nato pressured Moldovia to reject an all but done deal over Transnistria


    So Russia was expected to mind its own business in when there was great enthusiasm in the Bush Administration for Ukraine and Georgia joining Nato and there was an announcement they would be at some point? What actually happened was Russia invaded Georgia.

    According to America’s Ambassador in Moscow Michael McFaul, in private Boris Nemtsov advocated making Ukraine thoroughly western as a way of getting Putin removed from power. In September 2013, the National Edowment For Democracy''s Carl Gershman wrote in The Washington Post, “Ukraine’s choice to join Europe would mean ... Putin may find himself on the losing end not just in the near abroad but within Russia itself.”

    It would be difficult for the Kremlin to avoid concluding that Nato was an anti Russia military alliance whose pre announced and never renounced incorporation of Ukraine was intended to destablise Russian domestic politics and especially topple Putin, who had some claim to being democratically elected.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

  906. @silviosilver
    @Mikel


    More than the splitting image of McGregor, you come across like the splitting image of Alex Jones,
     
    It's spitting image, not splitting. But the way you're using it, I think you mean "mirror image." A spitting image means an identical copy. "I know a guy who looks exactly like Rod Stewart - he's a spitting image!" (True story, btw.) A mirror image, when referring to people, means sharing a common quality despite perhaps differing in some ways. "In their harsh totalitarian social policies, the bolsheviks were a mirror image of the nazis."

    Replies: @Mikel

    Thanks. It’s one of those expressions I hardly ever hear in spoken language so it’s difficult to figure out from memory what the correct spelling should be, for me at least. And now that you mention it, yes, mirror image is the expression I should have used from the beginning. I hope John Johnson doesn’t also look like Alex Jones!

    By the way, I think you should adopt your grammar nazi role more often on this blog full of non-native English speakers. Feel free to shame me as often as you want. I will accept the punishment stoically if it serves to improve my writing skills.

    • Replies: @silviosilver
    @Mikel

    I hope you don't think my intention was to actually 'shame' or 'punish' you. I know some people hate being corrected, but I personally like it when it's done to me, even when it's somewhat harsh. I like the way the French don't hesitate to correct me. It leaves me objectively better off. If I'm corrected, the chances I'll make that mistake again are drastically reduced. Letting me ramble on with error-riddled speech - or worse, complimenting me - does me no favors at all. And if it's any consolation, you got Johnny Johnson saying "splitting", so I guess he didn't know the difference either. :)

    Replies: @Mikel

  907. @AP
    @Mr. XYZ


    Question for you, AP: Do you think that the Ukrainian diaspora worldwide would have been larger without the World Wars? Apparently WWI stopped the mass wave of Galician emigration and it never returned to its pre-war levels
     
    Certainly. If not for World War I, the three Canadian Prairie provinces would have been 1/4 or 1/3 Ukrainian, instead of 10% Ukrainian. Given high Ukrainian organizational capacity, they would have probably dominated those provinces.

    OTOH this would have made the Polish position in Galicia stronger, because Ukrainians wee emigrating at a higher rate than Poles were.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    Certainly. If not for World War I, the three Canadian Prairie provinces would have been 1/4 or 1/3 Ukrainian, instead of 10% Ukrainian. Given high Ukrainian organizational capacity, they would have probably dominated those provinces.

    Interesting. Thank you!

    Would large numbers of Ukrainians from Russia have eventually moved to Canada in such a scenario, following their Galician co-ethnics, or would they have preferred to colonize Siberia, Central Asia, and the Russian Far East instead?

    OTOH this would have made the Polish position in Galicia stronger, because Ukrainians wee emigrating at a higher rate than Poles were.

    So, if Poland still eventually breaks away from Russia, if there is ever still a Russian Revolution in this scenario (possible but not guaranteed), Poland will subsequently gain all of Galicia while Romania gains Bukovina, perhaps in exchange for Poland joining the Dual Alliance of Austria-Hungary and Germany or even the Triple Alliance of Austria-Hungary, Germany, and Italy?

    BTW, did you ever take a look at Friedrich Naumann’s 1915 book Mitteleuropa? Here is an English translation of it:

    https://archive.org/details/centraleurope00ashlgoog/mode/2up

    He’s essentially arguing that Germany and Austria-Hungary should unite in order to form a larger economic and political unit, perhaps as a precursor to eventually creating a proto-EU. He was envisioning this in the context of a CP WWI victory.

    Also, one more question, albeit a very off-topic one: Do you think that the US would have still eventually acquired the Danish West Indies (later renamed the US Virgin Islands) without World War I? The US almost acquired them back in 1902; a tie vote in the upper house of the Danish parliament (Landst(h)ing) derailed this proposal back then; one more vote there and it would have passed. (In real life, the US finally acquired these islands in 1917 in large part as a result of WWI.)

    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @Mr. XYZ

    I visited my local Italian/Ukrainian dentist today. I think that he leaned more towards his Ukrainian side than his Italian though, as his mother made sure that he went to Ukrainian language schools in Alberta growing up (all the way through high school). I'm the only one here, I think, who still utters a few greetings to him in Ukrainian, here in AZ. He does still maintain an interest in Ukrainian/Canadian affairs and tells me that the Canadian population is being swelled considerably today by Ukrainian refugees.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

  908. @AP
    @Mikel


    Btw, the only two Putin defenders left here are Gerard and Mikhail
     
    There are also QCIC and the LondonBob guy, who writes sporadically. AnoninTN may come back.

    The funny thing is that the anti-Putin guys are more connected to Russia than the pro-Putin guys. Mikhail doesn't even speak Russian, despite being of Russian descent. One would think that he would at least have bothered learning the language. I at least speak it well enough to get mistaken for a tourist from the near abroad such as Poland, Latvia, or Czechia (I have gotten such questions - I was never was mistaken for a Ukrainian when speaking Russian in Moscow, they probably assume Ukrainians speak better Russian than I do). Gerard lives in a shithole in northern industrial England. I last visited Moscow in 2019. I suspect he hasn't been back as recently.

    BTW, if he lies that I was never in Russia, I did meet our former host in Moscow, as he confirmed:

    https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-40/

    (looking at the the archived posts from that month, highlighted the high quality of this blog when it was active, thanks to Karlin)

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Mikel, @QCIC, @Mikhail

    The funny thing is that the anti-Putin guys are more connected to Russia than the pro-Putin guys.

    I myself speak Russian. It’s my first language. I never actually lived in Russia, with me being born in Israel to ex-USSR immigrant parents who have then just recently moved there and living there until moving to the US with my family at age 8, slightly over 20 years ago, where I have lived ever since. I was neutral-to-positive on Putin prior to the current war. I disliked his likely assassinations of Russian opposition figures, obviously, but I feared that the Russian deep state could still try engaging in such behavior even without him and that whoever replaces him might be worse for the Russian people economically-wise relative to him. But of course the current Ukrainian war have completely changed and transformed my attitudes towards Putin in a much more negative light. He’s essentially a milder version of Hitler (cultural genocide rather than physical genocide) at this point in time.

    • Replies: @QCIC
    @Mr. XYZ

    The West effectively threatened to attack Russia when the USA dropped out of the ABM treaty. Considering the nature of MAD this threat was way too close to an actual attack. This notion was subject to confirmation which the West supplied by progressively expanding NATO and working to polarize Russia's border countries against her. The West supported political changes in Ukraine which led to a civil war against Russian sympathizers and Russia naturally got involved.

    Putin's RusFed may be full of bad people, but it seems unreasonable to blame him for actions by the West which have been blatantly militarily provocative. As far as I know, none of the Western moves were reactive or defensive. They were all part of a long attack plan borne out of post-Cold War hubris.

    If you do not understand this foundation for the conflict in Ukraine you may be confused. The conflict is not really about Ukraine.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

  909. @AP
    @Mikel


    Btw, the only two Putin defenders left here are Gerard and Mikhail
     
    There are also QCIC and the LondonBob guy, who writes sporadically. AnoninTN may come back.

    The funny thing is that the anti-Putin guys are more connected to Russia than the pro-Putin guys. Mikhail doesn't even speak Russian, despite being of Russian descent. One would think that he would at least have bothered learning the language. I at least speak it well enough to get mistaken for a tourist from the near abroad such as Poland, Latvia, or Czechia (I have gotten such questions - I was never was mistaken for a Ukrainian when speaking Russian in Moscow, they probably assume Ukrainians speak better Russian than I do). Gerard lives in a shithole in northern industrial England. I last visited Moscow in 2019. I suspect he hasn't been back as recently.

    BTW, if he lies that I was never in Russia, I did meet our former host in Moscow, as he confirmed:

    https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-40/

    (looking at the the archived posts from that month, highlighted the high quality of this blog when it was active, thanks to Karlin)

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Mikel, @QCIC, @Mikhail

    There are also QCIC and the LondonBob guy, who writes sporadically.

    True. It’s four Putin supporters left rather than just two. Still, a big waste of energy by JJ. Perhaps I shouldn’t have gone so hard on him though. I think it’s just that seeing the clip of Greta meeting Zelensky put me in a real bad mood and I haven’t found anyone in real life to vent my frustration with.

    • Replies: @AP
    @Mikel

    I don't understand the anger towards Greta. She's a mentally ill teenager who had been exploited by various people. She might be getting more common sense as she matures, as shown by her turn towards nuclear. Hopefully she recovers.

    JJ is partisan but he is usually right and therefore is not in the same league as creatures such as Ritter.

    Replies: @Mikel, @Emil Nikola Richard

  910. @Coconuts
    @Mr. Hack

    Iirc Scotland has the most redheads, then Ireland is somewhere with Udmurts people in terms of the number. I might be wrong, just going from what I can remember.

    Many redheads wherever they are found seem to resemble each other in some way.

    Replies: @QCIC, @Wokechoke

    Red hair?

    • Replies: @Coconuts
    @QCIC

    Yeah, I realised after I posted, I should have said apart from the red hair and blue/green eyes.

    Replies: @QCIC

  911. @AP
    @Gerard1234


    LMAO. As is expected, this fantasis
     
    You were caught posting from some post-industrial shithole in northern England. The worst place to live in England. What a loser. I guess a Sovok untermensch "civil engineer" is good for cleaning an abandoned factory.

    How is life among the Pakistani gangs? Do they appreciate your gender fluidity (you have admitted it)?

    It's funny how much you wrote, when you were shown to be an ignorant moron as usual.

    Since you insist, we will continue the lesson.

    In North America, place names come from the first settlers. Ukrainians came to North America in the late 19th century. By that time, most places were already long-settled. In the USA, most Ukrainians came to New York, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Ohio, Chicago, Michigan. These places had been settled and named for hundreds of years. So there are probably no Ukrainian place names in the USA.

    But in the Canadian prairies, Ukrainians were often the first settlers. So that is where the Ukrainian place names are.

    For example, Ukraina, Manitoba:

    https://roadsidethoughts.com/mb/ukraina-profile.htm

    You claim people who didn't think they were Ukrainian would name a place Ukraina?

    A Canadian government source with some more Ukrainian place names:

    https://www.communitystories.ca/v1/pm_v2.php?id=story_line&lg=English&fl=0&ex=00000464&sl=5522&pos=1

    A resident of Ukraina in Manitoba (near Dauphin) tells how, in 1897, a group of Ukrainian immigrants settled on virgin territory some 200 miles from Winnipeg. Once established, the immigrants met to agree on the geographic name to be given the settlement. A proposal that the new settlement bear the name "Ukraina" out of respect for their native land won general agreement. The next step was a letter to Ottawa with a request that the name be officially registered. A request that the near-by railway station be called Dnipro was also forwarded at the same time. The government agreed to the request for Ukraina but rejected the other request with the explanation that there was already a community named Dnipro in Saskatchewan. That is how the first place name ''Ukraina" appeared in Canada. Altogether there are three - one in each of the western provinces. Place names borrowed from the homeland also crop up in names like Halicz, Zbaraz. Komarno, Seech, Dnieper, Poltava, Ternopol, Luzan, Sniatyn, Sokal, Kiev, Boian, Jaroslaw, Stry, Shepenge, Dniester, Zbruch, Prut, Karpati, and others.

    :::::::::::::::::

    If you knew something about Slavic languages, you would know that Ukrainian uses the Cyrillic alphabet. This alphabet is different from the Latin one. Did you know, idiot-Gerard, that Polish is a Slavic languages and that it uses the Latin alphabet?

    When Ukrainians came to North America they often uses Latin letters as Poles do. So "v" becomes "w," "ch" becomes "cz." This occurred with surnames and some place names.

    Here is from the Canadian Encyclopedia:

    https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/timeline/ukrainian-canadian-history

    "In 1892, a small group of immigrants organized by Ivan Pylypow"

    Note the "w."

    That is why there is a town in Canada called "Slawa."

    It has a Ukrainian Orthodox cemetery:

    https://www.findagrave.com/cemetery/2578461/saint-mary's-ukrainian-orthodox-cemetery

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Mr. Hack, @Dmitry, @Gerard1234

    post-industrial shithole in northern England

    Maybe there are some better experts here, but I don’t think Northern England is some kind of postindustrial dystopia, without modern companies or advanced jobs for engineers.

    It’s unsuccessful compared to London, but in the global perspective these are still cities with relatively modern economy and they part of one of the most booming countries for future industries.*

    For comparison, within the EU, Tallin attains as the most successful postcommunist city from viewpoint of future economy or hi-tech funding. Manchester a small city in Northern England, has more unicorns than Tallin, larger enterprise value than Tallin.

    “Startup ecosystem” consultancies, according to them, higher ranking cities are part of Northern regions like Manchester, Edinburgh, Newcastle upon Tyne, Birmingham, Leeds.

    *For the global context, if recent funding boom would indicate, United Kingdom in 2022 receives 55% of public venture capital as China, more than India and France. There is a lot of boom to the future industries. Maybe not compared to New England or California, but excluding America it is a boom.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @Dmitry

    Is northern England comparable to the US Rust Belt?

    , @AP
    @Dmitry


    "post-industrial shithole in northern England"

    Maybe there are some better experts here, but I don’t think Northern England is some kind of postindustrial dystopia, without modern companies or advanced jobs for engineers.
     
    It depends upon where in northern England. Much of it is like the US Rust Belt. Rotherham, Leeds region , etc. Startups may be new, but he was living there before that time. Cheap places may appeal to startups. But it's a miserable place for most:

    https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-eu-voters/in-englands-forgotten-rust-belt-voters-show-little-sign-of-brexit-regret-idUSKBN1KS0VM

    A Sovok civil "engineer" from 30 years ago is probably not going to be involved in startups.

    High crime:

    https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2020/01/01/17/22882596-0-image-a-1_1577900274503.jpg

    High unemployment:

    https://datawrapper.dwcdn.net/pAa5X/full.png

    Low income:

    https://www.ippr.org/files/news-and-media/press-releases/IPPRNorth_GDHI-UK%20heatmap_7Aug2015.png

    For comparison, within the EU, Tallin attains as the most successful postcommunist city from viewpoint of future economy or hi-tech funding. Manchester a small city in Northern England, has more unicorns than Tallin, larger enterprise value than Tallin.
     
    Tallinn has 450,00 people vs. 550,000 for Manchester.

    Tallinn and surrounding county has 600,000. Manchester county it is 2.9 million.

    Wiki about Talinn: "Tallinn has the highest number of startup companies per person among all capitals and larger cities in Europe[12] and is the birthplace of many international high-technology companies, including Skype, Wise and Bolt.[13][7] The city is home to the headquarters of the European Union's IT agency,[14] and to the NATO Cyber Defence Centre of Excellence. In 2007, Tallinn was listed among the top-10 digital cities in the world,[15] and in 2022, Tallinn was listed among the top-10 "medium-sized European cities of the future".[16]"

    Replies: @Coconuts, @Dmitry

  912. QCIC says:
    @AP
    @Mikel


    Anyway, Zelensky just received Greta in Kiev
     
    Zelensky is in the fight for Ukraine's existence and you are whining about Greta. Lol.

    Besides, she supports nuclear now so she is growing up and getting smarter:

    https://www.euronews.com/green/2022/10/12/greta-thunberg-on-nuclear-and-why-its-completely-insane-we-arent-talking-about-energy-savi

    Zelensky also welcomed Mike Pence.

    Replies: @A123, @QCIC

    Zelensky is the poster child for a long drawn out Western attack on Russia. His creators like to show him with a bunch of other poster children since this builds the brand.

    It will be interesting but sad to see how they mold Greta’s image as she gets older. Her parents are creeps.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @QCIC

    Hitler: Westerners are tools being manipulated by evil Jews!

    Putin: A Jew (Zelensky) is a tool being manipulated by evil Westerners!

  913. QCIC says:
    @Mr. XYZ
    @AP


    The funny thing is that the anti-Putin guys are more connected to Russia than the pro-Putin guys.
     
    I myself speak Russian. It's my first language. I never actually lived in Russia, with me being born in Israel to ex-USSR immigrant parents who have then just recently moved there and living there until moving to the US with my family at age 8, slightly over 20 years ago, where I have lived ever since. I was neutral-to-positive on Putin prior to the current war. I disliked his likely assassinations of Russian opposition figures, obviously, but I feared that the Russian deep state could still try engaging in such behavior even without him and that whoever replaces him might be worse for the Russian people economically-wise relative to him. But of course the current Ukrainian war have completely changed and transformed my attitudes towards Putin in a much more negative light. He's essentially a milder version of Hitler (cultural genocide rather than physical genocide) at this point in time.

    Replies: @QCIC

    The West effectively threatened to attack Russia when the USA dropped out of the ABM treaty. Considering the nature of MAD this threat was way too close to an actual attack. This notion was subject to confirmation which the West supplied by progressively expanding NATO and working to polarize Russia’s border countries against her. The West supported political changes in Ukraine which led to a civil war against Russian sympathizers and Russia naturally got involved.

    Putin’s RusFed may be full of bad people, but it seems unreasonable to blame him for actions by the West which have been blatantly militarily provocative. As far as I know, none of the Western moves were reactive or defensive. They were all part of a long attack plan borne out of post-Cold War hubris.

    If you do not understand this foundation for the conflict in Ukraine you may be confused. The conflict is not really about Ukraine.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @QCIC

    Why didn't Russia go to war against the Baltic countries in 2003-2004? The US had already dropped out of the ABM Treaty by that point in time, doing so back in 2002.

    Replies: @QCIC

  914. @Mikel
    @silviosilver

    Thanks. It's one of those expressions I hardly ever hear in spoken language so it's difficult to figure out from memory what the correct spelling should be, for me at least. And now that you mention it, yes, mirror image is the expression I should have used from the beginning. I hope John Johnson doesn't also look like Alex Jones!

    By the way, I think you should adopt your grammar nazi role more often on this blog full of non-native English speakers. Feel free to shame me as often as you want. I will accept the punishment stoically if it serves to improve my writing skills.

    Replies: @silviosilver

    I hope you don’t think my intention was to actually ‘shame’ or ‘punish’ you. I know some people hate being corrected, but I personally like it when it’s done to me, even when it’s somewhat harsh. I like the way the French don’t hesitate to correct me. It leaves me objectively better off. If I’m corrected, the chances I’ll make that mistake again are drastically reduced. Letting me ramble on with error-riddled speech – or worse, complimenting me – does me no favors at all. And if it’s any consolation, you got Johnny Johnson saying “splitting”, so I guess he didn’t know the difference either. 🙂

    • Agree: Mikel
    • Replies: @Mikel
    @silviosilver

    I may be very critical of the typical boomer mentality, both in the West and I now see in the Sovok sphere as well, but technically speaking, I could be considered to be a boomer myself and I don't think by any means that everything about my generation was wrong. The practice of naming and shaming, in particular, has undoubtedly a great didactic value.

  915. @QCIC
    @Mr. XYZ

    The West effectively threatened to attack Russia when the USA dropped out of the ABM treaty. Considering the nature of MAD this threat was way too close to an actual attack. This notion was subject to confirmation which the West supplied by progressively expanding NATO and working to polarize Russia's border countries against her. The West supported political changes in Ukraine which led to a civil war against Russian sympathizers and Russia naturally got involved.

    Putin's RusFed may be full of bad people, but it seems unreasonable to blame him for actions by the West which have been blatantly militarily provocative. As far as I know, none of the Western moves were reactive or defensive. They were all part of a long attack plan borne out of post-Cold War hubris.

    If you do not understand this foundation for the conflict in Ukraine you may be confused. The conflict is not really about Ukraine.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    Why didn’t Russia go to war against the Baltic countries in 2003-2004? The US had already dropped out of the ABM Treaty by that point in time, doing so back in 2002.

    • Replies: @QCIC
    @Mr. XYZ

    I think the relationship between the Baltic countries and Russia is vastly different from that between Russia and Belarus or Ukraine.

    Militarily they are less consequential than Ukraine. Nonetheless, bringing them into NATO was part of the progression of Western aggression against Russia. This was one of many very aggressive moves, as Western intellectuals and statesmen have pointed out.


    NATO has always been an anti-Russia military alliance created to fight and defeat the USSR and now Russia. It has no other purpose. Moving it up to the Russian border while at the same time ignoring Russian concerns about nuclear war is intrinsically aggressive and dangerous.
     

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

  916. @Dmitry
    @AP


    post-industrial shithole in northern England
     
    Maybe there are some better experts here, but I don't think Northern England is some kind of postindustrial dystopia, without modern companies or advanced jobs for engineers.

    It's unsuccessful compared to London, but in the global perspective these are still cities with relatively modern economy and they part of one of the most booming countries for future industries.*

    For comparison, within the EU, Tallin attains as the most successful postcommunist city from viewpoint of future economy or hi-tech funding. Manchester a small city in Northern England, has more unicorns than Tallin, larger enterprise value than Tallin.

    -

    "Startup ecosystem" consultancies, according to them, higher ranking cities are part of Northern regions like Manchester, Edinburgh, Newcastle upon Tyne, Birmingham, Leeds.


    https://i.imgur.com/LwSFb7R.jpg

    -

    *For the global context, if recent funding boom would indicate, United Kingdom in 2022 receives 55% of public venture capital as China, more than India and France. There is a lot of boom to the future industries. Maybe not compared to New England or California, but excluding America it is a boom.

    https://i.imgur.com/tRlVvTp.jpg

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @AP

    Is northern England comparable to the US Rust Belt?

  917. @QCIC
    @AP

    Zelensky is the poster child for a long drawn out Western attack on Russia. His creators like to show him with a bunch of other poster children since this builds the brand.

    It will be interesting but sad to see how they mold Greta's image as she gets older. Her parents are creeps.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    Hitler: Westerners are tools being manipulated by evil Jews!

    Putin: A Jew (Zelensky) is a tool being manipulated by evil Westerners!

    • Troll: QCIC
  918. Sean says:
    @Mr. XYZ
    @Sean


    The attempt to deny Russia any sphere of influence at all led to it crossing borders, annexing territory, and presenting US statecraft with a series of difficult problems, in addition to altering the terms of trade (paying more for raw materials), and causing all sorts of trouble in domestic politics such as Ukrainegate and Biden being unable to let Ukraine stop fighting without huge international loss of American prestige. The Western world would have been better off keeping its nose out of Ukraine, and ignored the geopolitical ‘experts’ who thought there was anything to be gained by:-
     
    The West was arguably prepared to give Russia a sphere of influence over Central Asia. But Russia didn't want that. Russia wanted Ukraine (and Belarus).

    As for a harm reduction perspective, if one applies it, then sure, the West should have surrendered Ukraine to Russia, especially back in 2013-2014. However, the same logic and perspective if applied consistently would also mean having Russia surrender Serbia to Austria-Hungary back in 1914 and having the Anglo-French surrender Poland and/or the Baltic countries to Nazi Germany so that the Anglo-French can successfully secure an anti-Nazi Soviet alliance.

    Replies: @Sean

    The West was arguably prepared to give Russia a sphere of influence over Central Asia. But Russia didn’t want that. Russia wanted Ukraine …

    Under Yeltsin, Russia was fobbed off when it tried to join Nato. The same thing happened when Putin asked if Russia could join Nato. Nato pressured Moldovia to reject an all but done deal over Transnistria

    So Russia was expected to mind its own business in when there was great enthusiasm in the Bush Administration for Ukraine and Georgia joining Nato and there was an announcement they would be at some point? What actually happened was Russia invaded Georgia.

    According to America’s Ambassador in Moscow Michael McFaul, in private Boris Nemtsov advocated making Ukraine thoroughly western as a way of getting Putin removed from power. In September 2013, the National Edowment For Democracy”s Carl Gershman wrote in The Washington Post, “Ukraine’s choice to join Europe would mean … Putin may find himself on the losing end not just in the near abroad but within Russia itself.”

    It would be difficult for the Kremlin to avoid concluding that Nato was an anti Russia military alliance whose pre announced and never renounced incorporation of Ukraine was intended to destablise Russian domestic politics and especially topple Putin, who had some claim to being democratically elected.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @Sean

    The Transnistria deal involved giving Transnistria veto power over Moldovan policies, no?

    And Yes, the West certainly wanted to turn Ukraine into a pro-Western development model for the rest of the East Slavic world.

    Replies: @Sean

  919. AP says:
    @Mikel
    @AP


    There are also QCIC and the LondonBob guy, who writes sporadically.
     
    True. It's four Putin supporters left rather than just two. Still, a big waste of energy by JJ. Perhaps I shouldn't have gone so hard on him though. I think it's just that seeing the clip of Greta meeting Zelensky put me in a real bad mood and I haven't found anyone in real life to vent my frustration with.

    Replies: @AP

    I don’t understand the anger towards Greta. She’s a mentally ill teenager who had been exploited by various people. She might be getting more common sense as she matures, as shown by her turn towards nuclear. Hopefully she recovers.

    JJ is partisan but he is usually right and therefore is not in the same league as creatures such as Ritter.

    • Disagree: Mikhail
    • Thanks: Mr. XYZ
    • LOL: QCIC
    • Replies: @Mikel
    @AP


    I don’t understand the anger towards Greta. She’s a mentally ill teenager
     
    Exactly. She has been clinically diagnosed as a sufferer of a host of mental diseases, including Asperger syndrome and OCD, and there's some evidence of physical abnormalities in the FSAD spectrum as well. On top of that she has never been able to express any novel ideas that you coulnd't read on the environment section of any MSM outlet. So why does everybody feel the need to treat her as an ideological icon of our times, beclowning the public discourse and doing her no favors in the treatment of her serious problems?
    , @Emil Nikola Richard
    @AP

    E. Michael Jones has the most hilarious greta therber gossip. Apparently she was a model child before all her classmates hit puberty and her tits didn't grow and it all could have been fixed with a small strategically timed boob job which her high IQ rich parents could have easily afforded if they possessed one clue.

    Replies: @Anatoly Karlin

  920. @Sean
    @Mr. XYZ


    The West was arguably prepared to give Russia a sphere of influence over Central Asia. But Russia didn’t want that. Russia wanted Ukraine ...
     
    Under Yeltsin, Russia was fobbed off when it tried to join Nato. The same thing happened when Putin asked if Russia could join Nato. Nato pressured Moldovia to reject an all but done deal over Transnistria


    So Russia was expected to mind its own business in when there was great enthusiasm in the Bush Administration for Ukraine and Georgia joining Nato and there was an announcement they would be at some point? What actually happened was Russia invaded Georgia.

    According to America’s Ambassador in Moscow Michael McFaul, in private Boris Nemtsov advocated making Ukraine thoroughly western as a way of getting Putin removed from power. In September 2013, the National Edowment For Democracy''s Carl Gershman wrote in The Washington Post, “Ukraine’s choice to join Europe would mean ... Putin may find himself on the losing end not just in the near abroad but within Russia itself.”

    It would be difficult for the Kremlin to avoid concluding that Nato was an anti Russia military alliance whose pre announced and never renounced incorporation of Ukraine was intended to destablise Russian domestic politics and especially topple Putin, who had some claim to being democratically elected.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    The Transnistria deal involved giving Transnistria veto power over Moldovan policies, no?

    And Yes, the West certainly wanted to turn Ukraine into a pro-Western development model for the rest of the East Slavic world.

    • Replies: @Sean
    @Mr. XYZ


    And Yes, the West certainly wanted to turn Ukraine into a pro-Western development model for the rest of the East Slavic world.
     
    Apart from Russia which was explicitly told it could not join the EU, and found it there was an unspoken agreement it was not allowed to join NATO. So all the Eastern Slavic countries (and Georgia) added to the Western European ones would in NATO and the EU. On the other side, just Russia. I am surprised the Russians could not see the great and ever growing advantages there would be in this arrangement for them.

    The Transnistria deal involved giving Transnistria veto power over Moldovan policies, no?
     
    Formally instituted rather than gave. The 1992 conflict showed that Moldavia may have thought it was master in its own house and Transnistria and its backers had to like it or lump it, but such was not the case. I think the 2008 invasion of Georgia, the 2014 hybrid war in Donbass and annexation of Crimea, and the 2022 full scale assaults on Kiev show that, whatever rights those countries thought international law gave them to make whatever alliances they wished without reference to Russia there always was a brute force veto if the Russians dared use it. And that went for Georgia, and now Ukraine in being taught the same lesson by force too.

    Surely it is better to have the Russian veto formalized as belonging to an autonomous regions of Russian speaking Ukrainians in the constitutional arrangements of the country so it could live in peace than proceeding as if Russia would be forced to swallow it because it ethically ought to? It might have but it was barely possible in the real world.


    Noted: George Kennan on NATO Expansion
    Excerpt from George F. Kennan, “A Fateful Error,” New York Times, 05 Feb 1997

    “Why, with all the hopeful possibilities engendered by the end of the Cold War, should East-West relations become centered on the question of who would be allied with whom and, by implication, against whom in some fanciful, totally unforeseeable and most improbable future military conflict?”

    “[B]luntly stated…expanding NATO would be the most fateful error of American policy in the entire post-Cold War era. Such a decision may be expected to inflame the nationalistic, anti-Western and militaristic tendencies in Russian opinion; to have an adverse effect on the development of Russian democracy; to restore the atmosphere of the cold war to East-West relations, and to impel Russian foreign policy in directions decidedly not to our liking … ”

     

    They were not literally impelled to invade Ukraine of course; they could have decided failure to maintains Russia's position was less bad that being morally turpitude of an invasion.

    Replies: @LatW, @Mr. XYZ

  921. @Mr. XYZ
    @AP


    Certainly. If not for World War I, the three Canadian Prairie provinces would have been 1/4 or 1/3 Ukrainian, instead of 10% Ukrainian. Given high Ukrainian organizational capacity, they would have probably dominated those provinces.
     
    Interesting. Thank you!

    Would large numbers of Ukrainians from Russia have eventually moved to Canada in such a scenario, following their Galician co-ethnics, or would they have preferred to colonize Siberia, Central Asia, and the Russian Far East instead?


    OTOH this would have made the Polish position in Galicia stronger, because Ukrainians wee emigrating at a higher rate than Poles were.
     
    So, if Poland still eventually breaks away from Russia, if there is ever still a Russian Revolution in this scenario (possible but not guaranteed), Poland will subsequently gain all of Galicia while Romania gains Bukovina, perhaps in exchange for Poland joining the Dual Alliance of Austria-Hungary and Germany or even the Triple Alliance of Austria-Hungary, Germany, and Italy?

    BTW, did you ever take a look at Friedrich Naumann's 1915 book Mitteleuropa? Here is an English translation of it:

    https://archive.org/details/centraleurope00ashlgoog/mode/2up

    He's essentially arguing that Germany and Austria-Hungary should unite in order to form a larger economic and political unit, perhaps as a precursor to eventually creating a proto-EU. He was envisioning this in the context of a CP WWI victory.

    Also, one more question, albeit a very off-topic one: Do you think that the US would have still eventually acquired the Danish West Indies (later renamed the US Virgin Islands) without World War I? The US almost acquired them back in 1902; a tie vote in the upper house of the Danish parliament (Landst(h)ing) derailed this proposal back then; one more vote there and it would have passed. (In real life, the US finally acquired these islands in 1917 in large part as a result of WWI.)

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

    I visited my local Italian/Ukrainian dentist today. I think that he leaned more towards his Ukrainian side than his Italian though, as his mother made sure that he went to Ukrainian language schools in Alberta growing up (all the way through high school). I’m the only one here, I think, who still utters a few greetings to him in Ukrainian, here in AZ. He does still maintain an interest in Ukrainian/Canadian affairs and tells me that the Canadian population is being swelled considerably today by Ukrainian refugees.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @Mr. Hack

    What are his future hopes for Ukraine?

    Also, in regards to Arizona, what are your thoughts on Phoenix's giant population boom as well as Arizona's rapid Hispanicization over the last several decades?

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

  922. “If you don’t like that, my suggestion would be to “exit” the American project (or any of the other ~200 nation-scams). Cryptocurrencies now offer the possibility of bypassing old, stagnant centralized institutions in their entirety – get to buidling #DeSci instead of whining.”

    I’m skeptical about the potential of network states to fully replace nation-states, but DeSci strikes me as an extraordinarily great thing:

    https://ethereum.org/en/desci/

    Right now, we have various independent researchers doing “taboo” research but wouldn’t it be great if they would have a much easier funding mechanism that can’t be blocked by stupid Woke elites? I seem to recall VDARE.com previously mentioning PayPal blocking funds to various alt-right and/or alt-lite figures in the US and/or West. It would be great to solve this problem through crypto and also to use crypto to fund much more independent researchers and to give them a great lifestyle!

    Anatoly, have you ever considered contacting people like Bo Winegard, Noah Carl, and Bryan Pesta about DeSci and crypto funding? They might be very interested in this.

  923. @Mr. Hack
    @Mr. XYZ

    I visited my local Italian/Ukrainian dentist today. I think that he leaned more towards his Ukrainian side than his Italian though, as his mother made sure that he went to Ukrainian language schools in Alberta growing up (all the way through high school). I'm the only one here, I think, who still utters a few greetings to him in Ukrainian, here in AZ. He does still maintain an interest in Ukrainian/Canadian affairs and tells me that the Canadian population is being swelled considerably today by Ukrainian refugees.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    What are his future hopes for Ukraine?

    Also, in regards to Arizona, what are your thoughts on Phoenix’s giant population boom as well as Arizona’s rapid Hispanicization over the last several decades?

    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @Mr. XYZ


    What are his future hopes for Ukraine?
     
    He thinks that Putler is a very dangerous bad apple that needs to be removed ASAP, especially because of his toxic sabre rattling that includes the use of nukes. Of course he wishes the best for the Ukrainians including the ability to rule in their own country.

    Also, in regards to Arizona, what are your thoughts on Phoenix’s giant population boom as well as Arizona’s rapid Hispanicization over the last several decades?
     
    The giant population boom in Phoenix is a pain in the ass, including all of the social problems associated with high traffic, homelessness etc. The inner city schools can be wild places and it's difficult to keep qualified teachers working within. The pay isn't great either. You'll remember me speaking well of the Mexican and Latino community here in my comments in the past. They keep to themselves, work hard, are family oriented and go to church - what's there not to like? In addition many of their people are quite good looking, I had a dental assistant yesterday help in my teeth cleaning that was way beyond gorgeous.

    Replies: @Wokechoke

  924. AP says:
    @Dmitry
    @AP


    post-industrial shithole in northern England
     
    Maybe there are some better experts here, but I don't think Northern England is some kind of postindustrial dystopia, without modern companies or advanced jobs for engineers.

    It's unsuccessful compared to London, but in the global perspective these are still cities with relatively modern economy and they part of one of the most booming countries for future industries.*

    For comparison, within the EU, Tallin attains as the most successful postcommunist city from viewpoint of future economy or hi-tech funding. Manchester a small city in Northern England, has more unicorns than Tallin, larger enterprise value than Tallin.

    -

    "Startup ecosystem" consultancies, according to them, higher ranking cities are part of Northern regions like Manchester, Edinburgh, Newcastle upon Tyne, Birmingham, Leeds.


    https://i.imgur.com/LwSFb7R.jpg

    -

    *For the global context, if recent funding boom would indicate, United Kingdom in 2022 receives 55% of public venture capital as China, more than India and France. There is a lot of boom to the future industries. Maybe not compared to New England or California, but excluding America it is a boom.

    https://i.imgur.com/tRlVvTp.jpg

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @AP

    “post-industrial shithole in northern England”

    Maybe there are some better experts here, but I don’t think Northern England is some kind of postindustrial dystopia, without modern companies or advanced jobs for engineers.

    It depends upon where in northern England. Much of it is like the US Rust Belt. Rotherham, Leeds region , etc. Startups may be new, but he was living there before that time. Cheap places may appeal to startups. But it’s a miserable place for most:

    https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-eu-voters/in-englands-forgotten-rust-belt-voters-show-little-sign-of-brexit-regret-idUSKBN1KS0VM

    A Sovok civil “engineer” from 30 years ago is probably not going to be involved in startups.

    High crime:

    High unemployment:

    Low income:

    For comparison, within the EU, Tallin attains as the most successful postcommunist city from viewpoint of future economy or hi-tech funding. Manchester a small city in Northern England, has more unicorns than Tallin, larger enterprise value than Tallin.

    Tallinn has 450,00 people vs. 550,000 for Manchester.

    Tallinn and surrounding county has 600,000. Manchester county it is 2.9 million.

    Wiki about Talinn: “Tallinn has the highest number of startup companies per person among all capitals and larger cities in Europe[12] and is the birthplace of many international high-technology companies, including Skype, Wise and Bolt.[13][7] The city is home to the headquarters of the European Union’s IT agency,[14] and to the NATO Cyber Defence Centre of Excellence. In 2007, Tallinn was listed among the top-10 digital cities in the world,[15] and in 2022, Tallinn was listed among the top-10 “medium-sized European cities of the future”.[16]”

    • Replies: @Coconuts
    @AP

    Ha, I live in one of the most dangerous areas.

    Some of that Reuters reporting may not be 100% representative of what those cities are like.

    I have a friend who is a civil engineer in Manchester; they live in one of the Manchester suburbs that has similar house prices and income levels to the Home Counties around London:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hale_Barns

    This must be where some of the start-up wealth ends up.

    Replies: @AP

    , @Dmitry
    @AP


    startup companies per person among all capitals and larger cities in Europe

     

    This is surely marketing from tourism department, because they exclude many small cities which have more than them.

    Also I would guess not actually true if you compare to some large cities like London. Perhaps they are limited to large cities of the EU.

    vs. 550,000 for Manchester.
     
    Manchester is not so bad, they will soon have more unicorns (startups valued over $1 billion within 10 years), than large postcommunist countries like Poland with populations of 40 million.

    For example, if you add together British cities like Manchester + Belfast, the startups in those two receive more venture capital than all Poland last year.


    Cheap places may appeal to startups. But it’s a miserable place for most:
     
    Compared to where? The standard of living is very high in those places, if you look at the data and compare to most other countries. We discussed already the income situation of the population i.e. the low income people are not really low income, according to your own judgements for other countries.

    defines happiness in a way that is not actually happiness:

    https://edition.cnn.com/travel/article/world-happiest-countries-2023-wellness/index.html

    healthy life expectancy, GDP per capita, social support, low corruption, generosity in a community where people look after each other and freedom to make key life decisions.

    These are nice things,
     

    Sure, it's not a great measure and not exactly happiness. But it is an example of a kind of development index, created by the economists, which focuses on mix of those indexes.

    Another example is the UN's HDI index, which also has mostly small countries in terms of population near the top.

    Another is "Better Life Index", which has many small countries in top.

    There is "Social Progress Index", which has kind of similar results.
    https://www.socialprogress.org/global-index-2022-results/

    Replies: @LatW

  925. @silviosilver
    @Mikel

    I hope you don't think my intention was to actually 'shame' or 'punish' you. I know some people hate being corrected, but I personally like it when it's done to me, even when it's somewhat harsh. I like the way the French don't hesitate to correct me. It leaves me objectively better off. If I'm corrected, the chances I'll make that mistake again are drastically reduced. Letting me ramble on with error-riddled speech - or worse, complimenting me - does me no favors at all. And if it's any consolation, you got Johnny Johnson saying "splitting", so I guess he didn't know the difference either. :)

    Replies: @Mikel

    I may be very critical of the typical boomer mentality, both in the West and I now see in the Sovok sphere as well, but technically speaking, I could be considered to be a boomer myself and I don’t think by any means that everything about my generation was wrong. The practice of naming and shaming, in particular, has undoubtedly a great didactic value.

  926. This place is/was supposed to be for the old Karlin crew to discuss and hang out.

    Mr. XYZ is not part of that & is driving people off.

    Ban him.

    The choice is either that or a continued bleed off.

    L8z.

    • Agree: QCIC
    • Disagree: Mr. Hack
    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @Sher Singh

    I was on here since early 2017, actually. I simply took a year-long break since very late 2021. Check my logs if you don't believe me.

    You can see some of my earliest comments on AK's blog from early 2017 here:

    https://www.unz.com/akarlin/paper-review-artificial-wombs/

    So, I am not a newcomer to this blog but merely a returning user.

  927. AP says:
    @Dmitry
    @Mr. XYZ

    This is the completed fertility by birth cohort. As you can see, fertility rate in Germany is below replacement (which is a higher than 2,1 in this epoch), for the 1930s. It rises to replacement for cohorts of women born after 1926 (parents of the baby boomers).

    https://i.imgur.com/e7JHMIS.jpg

    economies of scale, here you go:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economies_of_scale
     

    This article is about companies in microeconomics. It doesn't say countries should prioritize increasing population. That is not the correct understanding of the terminology.

    As for the ideal population size for countries, I'm sure there are better resources for discussing this theme, but we could return again to the world happiness report. Except Netherlands, the top countries have populations around 10 million or less. https://edition.cnn.com/travel/article/world-happiest-countries-2023-wellness/index.html Iceland is less than 400,000 people, Luxembourg is less than 700,000 people.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @AP

    As for the ideal population size for countries, I’m sure there are better resources for discussing this theme, but we could return again to the world happiness report.

    It defines happiness in a way that is not actually happiness:

    https://edition.cnn.com/travel/article/world-happiest-countries-2023-wellness/index.html

    healthy life expectancy, GDP per capita, social support, low corruption, generosity in a community where people look after each other and freedom to make key life decisions.

    These are nice things, and they are common in Scandinavia. But I don’t think that of the Scandinavian countries united into one, that the ranking would decline.

    Lithuania made the top 20. It is probably a nice country, but are Lithuanians particularly happy?

    Are Finns very happy people? Their country is the “happiest.”

    But Finland has the 9th highest rate of depression in the world, Lithuania the 10th:

    https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/depression-rates-by-country

    Lithuania has the 15th highest suicide rate, Finland 38th out of 183 countries:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_suicide_rate

  928. QCIC says:
    @AP
    @Mikel


    Btw, the only two Putin defenders left here are Gerard and Mikhail
     
    There are also QCIC and the LondonBob guy, who writes sporadically. AnoninTN may come back.

    The funny thing is that the anti-Putin guys are more connected to Russia than the pro-Putin guys. Mikhail doesn't even speak Russian, despite being of Russian descent. One would think that he would at least have bothered learning the language. I at least speak it well enough to get mistaken for a tourist from the near abroad such as Poland, Latvia, or Czechia (I have gotten such questions - I was never was mistaken for a Ukrainian when speaking Russian in Moscow, they probably assume Ukrainians speak better Russian than I do). Gerard lives in a shithole in northern industrial England. I last visited Moscow in 2019. I suspect he hasn't been back as recently.

    BTW, if he lies that I was never in Russia, I did meet our former host in Moscow, as he confirmed:

    https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-40/

    (looking at the the archived posts from that month, highlighted the high quality of this blog when it was active, thanks to Karlin)

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Mikel, @QCIC, @Mikhail

    QCIC = “The Anti-Nuclear War Guy”

    I don’t claim to have any deep understanding of Russian, Ukrainian or USA geopolitics. In my opinion many of the important driving forces are apparently obscured from view.

    I stand by the idea that Ukraine is a pawn being used against Russia by the West. I don’t think this conclusion is really controversial for you people. I accept that for emotional reasons some people see this conflict as your “best shot” to secure a Ukrainian homeland. While I understand this perspective, I think you are deeply and dangerously mistaken on the overall picture.

    I have written that I consider Putin to be an impressive world leader who is able to respond to questions which would turn Western politicians into jello. So he evokes the image of what I thought a Statesman should be when I was younger and more naive. None of the US presidents back through Ford were capable of an intelligent conversation with the man. Nixon might have been OK, but his time was before my awareness on this topic. This doesn’t mean I like Putin, but I respect his skill.

  929. @AP
    @Mikel

    I don't understand the anger towards Greta. She's a mentally ill teenager who had been exploited by various people. She might be getting more common sense as she matures, as shown by her turn towards nuclear. Hopefully she recovers.

    JJ is partisan but he is usually right and therefore is not in the same league as creatures such as Ritter.

    Replies: @Mikel, @Emil Nikola Richard

    I don’t understand the anger towards Greta. She’s a mentally ill teenager

    Exactly. She has been clinically diagnosed as a sufferer of a host of mental diseases, including Asperger syndrome and OCD, and there’s some evidence of physical abnormalities in the FSAD spectrum as well. On top of that she has never been able to express any novel ideas that you coulnd’t read on the environment section of any MSM outlet. So why does everybody feel the need to treat her as an ideological icon of our times, beclowning the public discourse and doing her no favors in the treatment of her serious problems?

    • Agree: Mikhail
  930. @AP
    @Mikel


    Btw, the only two Putin defenders left here are Gerard and Mikhail
     
    There are also QCIC and the LondonBob guy, who writes sporadically. AnoninTN may come back.

    The funny thing is that the anti-Putin guys are more connected to Russia than the pro-Putin guys. Mikhail doesn't even speak Russian, despite being of Russian descent. One would think that he would at least have bothered learning the language. I at least speak it well enough to get mistaken for a tourist from the near abroad such as Poland, Latvia, or Czechia (I have gotten such questions - I was never was mistaken for a Ukrainian when speaking Russian in Moscow, they probably assume Ukrainians speak better Russian than I do). Gerard lives in a shithole in northern industrial England. I last visited Moscow in 2019. I suspect he hasn't been back as recently.

    BTW, if he lies that I was never in Russia, I did meet our former host in Moscow, as he confirmed:

    https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-40/

    (looking at the the archived posts from that month, highlighted the high quality of this blog when it was active, thanks to Karlin)

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Mikel, @QCIC, @Mikhail

    Prominent Ukrainian-American activist Lev Dobriansky didn’t speak Ukrainian. Mercouris, Kissinger, Mearsheimer and a number of other foreign policy hands don’t speak Russian. In that category, numerous fluent Russian speakers in academia, media and body politic value the input of such folks. Fluent linguists don’t necessarily make for good analytical minds.

    • Replies: @AP
    @Mikhail

    Guess what? You are no Kissinger.

    Replies: @Mikhail

    , @Emil Nikola Richard
    @Mikhail

    When I asked google "does Alexander Mercouris speak Russian?" there was no answer on the first page. Previously I was informed or misinformed that he was competent in Russian and the selling point on his podcast was he reads Russian and watches the Russian social media channels.

    Replies: @Mikhail

  931. QCIC says:
    @Mr. XYZ
    @QCIC

    Why didn't Russia go to war against the Baltic countries in 2003-2004? The US had already dropped out of the ABM Treaty by that point in time, doing so back in 2002.

    Replies: @QCIC

    I think the relationship between the Baltic countries and Russia is vastly different from that between Russia and Belarus or Ukraine.

    Militarily they are less consequential than Ukraine. Nonetheless, bringing them into NATO was part of the progression of Western aggression against Russia. This was one of many very aggressive moves, as Western intellectuals and statesmen have pointed out.

    NATO has always been an anti-Russia military alliance created to fight and defeat the USSR and now Russia. It has no other purpose. Moving it up to the Russian border while at the same time ignoring Russian concerns about nuclear war is intrinsically aggressive and dangerous.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @QCIC

    In terms of placing nuclear missiles (which NATO has no intention of doing but which Russia nevertheless appears to be extremely paranoid about), the Baltics are as threatening to Russia as Ukraine is since the distances to Moscow in both cases are roughly equal.

    Replies: @QCIC, @Beckow

  932. @Anatoly Karlin
    @Mr. XYZ


    Maybe, but would the types who are particularly eager to do that be of particularly high human capital to begin with?
     
    Nationalist EHC will be first to defect from its own societies to recreate an "imagined past" of their culture in network states with "aligned" co-ideologists.

    https://twitter.com/powerfultakes/status/1617559733266776064

    (I do not claim to be EHC. I am merely an "object", a "thing", or a "whatever" that tries to observe and study EHC. However, I could certainly see myself holding an NFT denoting membership of a transhumanist-themed and a Tsarpunk-themed transnational network state; considering cosmism originated in the latter, they would not even be contradictory).

    In fact, this will arguably be a self-reinforcing process, to the extent that these dynamics suck away oxygen and EHC from nationalist/identitarian organizations rooted within and playing by the rules of the traditional nation-state. They are going to become even less prestigious than they are today.

    BTW, before your recent conversion, did you not view a super-powerful Russia (one that includes both Ukraine and Belarus) as a threat to network states?
     
    One of the bullish factors for network states is that many of the Great Powers are genuinely spiteful towards each other and will forge alliances of convenience with network states, proverbially selling us the rope with which we'll hang them. "Many such cases" historically.

    Regarding myself personally - I have never hid my contempt towards small nation nationalisms, which are parochial by definition.

    Alternate history scenarios aside, Russia has proven itself a "small" nation, its memes totally Americanized and ruinously so, continuing being a classic Russian nationalist at this point is only slightly less risible than being, say, a Polish or Romanian or even Ukrainian nationalist. I still retain my viewpoint that there is no reason for cultures that do not appear as playable factions in the Civilization games to exist. So for me this "transition" is both logical and at this point very psychologically easy.

    The only nationalisms that still make sense are American, Chinese, and perhaps Indian but they all come with their own thicket of issues. It's hard to reconcile with American multiculturalism and innately universalist characteristics (there's a reason why any true American nationalism defaults to White Nationalism which is both universal and transracial), with the Fourteen Principles of Xi Jinping Thought, with Indians basically being this melange of peoples who are as differentiated from each other as Europeans.

    French, German, etc. nationalism don't make any sense either at this point, despite their once formidable cultures. Visit London or Paris. All very bullish for network states.

    Replies: @songbird, @Mr. XYZ, @Ivashka the fool, @Mr. XYZ

    Also, you have previously said that Russia cannot be truly sovereign with only 150 million people, right? Then how exactly are network states supposed to be truly sovereign with population sizes that are astronomically smaller than Russia’s?

    You really think that a 1 million or 5 million or 10 million person-strong network state is actually capable of being truly sovereign? If so, how come it can be and a Russia with a whopping 150 million people cannot be?

    (I have previously mentioned how, outside of nation-states, only religious organizations (churches, et cetera) and political parties are able to amass membership sizes that are able to compete with those of nation-states, at least so far. And a network state run by either religious people or members of a single political party might not always have the best outcome, if one goes by the past experience of nation-states with such a character.)

    • Replies: @Anatoly Karlin
    @Mr. XYZ

    You should probably just gather any questions you have about network states for the next OT as this one is nearing its end.


    Also, you have previously said that Russia cannot be truly sovereign with only 150 million people, right? Then how exactly are network states supposed to be truly sovereign with population sizes that are astronomically smaller than Russia’s?
     
    Network states concentrate human and financial capital. Average IQ of the Zuzalu attendee might be that of an Ivy League university. So Hive Mind dynamics apply.

    In a world in which the relative power of network states gains and flips that of centralized states, even small network states can be very influential. Membership need not be and in fact cannot be exclusive. To a large extent, some fringe exceptions aside (double/triple citizenships), this doesn't apply to centralized states which impudently claim a monopoly on their denizens' national loyalties. (It's quite ridiculous if one thinks about, states claim something like 40% of GDP as taxes globally, but largely refuse to allow competition for more effective solutions in this sector).

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Mr. XYZ

  933. @Sher Singh
    This place is/was supposed to be for the old Karlin crew to discuss and hang out.

    Mr. XYZ is not part of that & is driving people off.

    Ban him.

    The choice is either that or a continued bleed off.

    L8z.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    I was on here since early 2017, actually. I simply took a year-long break since very late 2021. Check my logs if you don’t believe me.

    You can see some of my earliest comments on AK’s blog from early 2017 here:

    https://www.unz.com/akarlin/paper-review-artificial-wombs/

    So, I am not a newcomer to this blog but merely a returning user.

  934. @QCIC
    @Mr. XYZ

    I think the relationship between the Baltic countries and Russia is vastly different from that between Russia and Belarus or Ukraine.

    Militarily they are less consequential than Ukraine. Nonetheless, bringing them into NATO was part of the progression of Western aggression against Russia. This was one of many very aggressive moves, as Western intellectuals and statesmen have pointed out.


    NATO has always been an anti-Russia military alliance created to fight and defeat the USSR and now Russia. It has no other purpose. Moving it up to the Russian border while at the same time ignoring Russian concerns about nuclear war is intrinsically aggressive and dangerous.
     

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    In terms of placing nuclear missiles (which NATO has no intention of doing but which Russia nevertheless appears to be extremely paranoid about), the Baltics are as threatening to Russia as Ukraine is since the distances to Moscow in both cases are roughly equal.

    • Replies: @QCIC
    @Mr. XYZ

    A key point is aggressive intent by the West. The degree of aggressiveness by both parties in a MAD (mutually assured destruction) scenario establishes the risk. After the fall of the USSR, Russia tried to stay less aggressive while the USA and the West became more aggressive.

    Since Russia and Ukraine have positive historical and cultural ties, Western maneuvering in that country is a much stronger statement of intent than meddling in the Baltics. It shows more chutzpah and is a much clearer sign of mens rea toward Russia than previous Western meddling for the other NATO expansions. For people who don't understand: Ukraine in NATO is enough of a red line that even Western discussion of adding Ukraine to NATO is very bad, even if the actual implementation is unlikely or drawn out.

    NATO is an anti-Russia, anti-USSR military alliance. Expanding the border of this alliance closer to Russia is inherently an aggressive move.

    Attempting to bring Ukraine into NATO takes this military aggression to a higher level. It is a naked statement of the West's intention to break up the Russian state, not merely to threaten it.

    , @Beckow
    @Mr. XYZ


    ...In terms of placing nuclear missiles which NATO has no intention of doing...
     
    You are presumably smart enough to know the difference between what can happen and stated intentions: countries - all countries, all the time, incl. US - base their policies on what can happen. Intentions are for birds...here today, changed tomorrow, people lie, etc...Nato tried to deceive Russia after dropping the ABM treaty and then placed missiles in Poland-Romania "against Iran"...come on, let's be adults.

    We have a war in Europe that can still escalate out of control, a much worse economic, political, even cultural situation. The two sides aren't talking and they have stopped listening and literally live in two different worlds. Pretending that this is some sort of a one-sided out-of-a-blue Russian aggression is lying.

    The West needs to wake up and stop preaching one-sided nonsense or spout boomer stereotypes. That is stupid. Anyone with a 3-digit IQ understands that Nato has for decades aggressively tried to get a better fighting position vis-a-vis Russia. Ukraine was just the last step - obviously a step too far and Russia finally reacted. Why was Nato and the collective West doing it?

    There is no other rational answer than they hoped at some point to have such overwhelming strategic advantage that they would be able to dictate to Russia. These things are cumulative - you pretending that maybe Russia should had acted in 2003, 2008, 2014...is not really an argument, maybe they were not ready, but who cares?

    Unless Kiev manages to defeat Russia - that is highly unlikely - the Nato lying and games against Russia are over. We either get a newly divided Europe or a gradual soft rollback. Or we go up in smoke. Be serious - after Russia moved in 2022 the 'weaken and control Russia' plan has been dealt a fatal blow. Wait until next time Russia goes through its periodic ennui period and pounce then. Now it simply won't work.

  935. @AP
    @Dmitry


    "post-industrial shithole in northern England"

    Maybe there are some better experts here, but I don’t think Northern England is some kind of postindustrial dystopia, without modern companies or advanced jobs for engineers.
     
    It depends upon where in northern England. Much of it is like the US Rust Belt. Rotherham, Leeds region , etc. Startups may be new, but he was living there before that time. Cheap places may appeal to startups. But it's a miserable place for most:

    https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-eu-voters/in-englands-forgotten-rust-belt-voters-show-little-sign-of-brexit-regret-idUSKBN1KS0VM

    A Sovok civil "engineer" from 30 years ago is probably not going to be involved in startups.

    High crime:

    https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2020/01/01/17/22882596-0-image-a-1_1577900274503.jpg

    High unemployment:

    https://datawrapper.dwcdn.net/pAa5X/full.png

    Low income:

    https://www.ippr.org/files/news-and-media/press-releases/IPPRNorth_GDHI-UK%20heatmap_7Aug2015.png

    For comparison, within the EU, Tallin attains as the most successful postcommunist city from viewpoint of future economy or hi-tech funding. Manchester a small city in Northern England, has more unicorns than Tallin, larger enterprise value than Tallin.
     
    Tallinn has 450,00 people vs. 550,000 for Manchester.

    Tallinn and surrounding county has 600,000. Manchester county it is 2.9 million.

    Wiki about Talinn: "Tallinn has the highest number of startup companies per person among all capitals and larger cities in Europe[12] and is the birthplace of many international high-technology companies, including Skype, Wise and Bolt.[13][7] The city is home to the headquarters of the European Union's IT agency,[14] and to the NATO Cyber Defence Centre of Excellence. In 2007, Tallinn was listed among the top-10 digital cities in the world,[15] and in 2022, Tallinn was listed among the top-10 "medium-sized European cities of the future".[16]"

    Replies: @Coconuts, @Dmitry

    Ha, I live in one of the most dangerous areas.

    Some of that Reuters reporting may not be 100% representative of what those cities are like.

    I have a friend who is a civil engineer in Manchester; they live in one of the Manchester suburbs that has similar house prices and income levels to the Home Counties around London:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hale_Barns

    This must be where some of the start-up wealth ends up.

    • Replies: @AP
    @Coconuts


    Ha, I live in one of the most dangerous areas.

     

    My condolences. Well, ut has at least produced some great music. And one of the best commenters here :-)

    I have a friend who is a civil engineer in Manchester; they live in one of the Manchester suburbs that has similar house prices and income levels to the Home Counties around London

     

    Your friend probably didn’t get his degree from a third rate Soviet institute and didn’t come over to work construction or whatever because the shambolic state that produced him and that he still supports collapsed..

    There are some very nice areas around Detroit also (engineers in the auto industry have high incomes), yet overall the place is a shithole. It has, like Manchester, produced some great music though.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @Mr. XYZ

  936. @QCIC
    @Coconuts

    Red hair?

    Replies: @Coconuts

    Yeah, I realised after I posted, I should have said apart from the red hair and blue/green eyes.

    • Replies: @QCIC
    @Coconuts

    I was kidding. I think you made a good point. Female redheads often have a distinctive overall look that goes beyond the red hair, eyes and freckles. In other words if they dye their hair one can probably still readily recognize them as natural redheads. This look includes bone structure, thinness, whatever. I think the link between these physical traits is more obvious than similar links in blondes and brunettes.

  937. @Mr. XYZ
    @Sean

    The Transnistria deal involved giving Transnistria veto power over Moldovan policies, no?

    And Yes, the West certainly wanted to turn Ukraine into a pro-Western development model for the rest of the East Slavic world.

    Replies: @Sean

    And Yes, the West certainly wanted to turn Ukraine into a pro-Western development model for the rest of the East Slavic world.

    Apart from Russia which was explicitly told it could not join the EU, and found it there was an unspoken agreement it was not allowed to join NATO. So all the Eastern Slavic countries (and Georgia) added to the Western European ones would in NATO and the EU. On the other side, just Russia. I am surprised the Russians could not see the great and ever growing advantages there would be in this arrangement for them.

    The Transnistria deal involved giving Transnistria veto power over Moldovan policies, no?

    Formally instituted rather than gave. The 1992 conflict showed that Moldavia may have thought it was master in its own house and Transnistria and its backers had to like it or lump it, but such was not the case. I think the 2008 invasion of Georgia, the 2014 hybrid war in Donbass and annexation of Crimea, and the 2022 full scale assaults on Kiev show that, whatever rights those countries thought international law gave them to make whatever alliances they wished without reference to Russia there always was a brute force veto if the Russians dared use it. And that went for Georgia, and now Ukraine in being taught the same lesson by force too.

    Surely it is better to have the Russian veto formalized as belonging to an autonomous regions of Russian speaking Ukrainians in the constitutional arrangements of the country so it could live in peace than proceeding as if Russia would be forced to swallow it because it ethically ought to? It might have but it was barely possible in the real world.

    Noted: George Kennan on NATO Expansion
    Excerpt from George F. Kennan, “A Fateful Error,” New York Times, 05 Feb 1997

    “Why, with all the hopeful possibilities engendered by the end of the Cold War, should East-West relations become centered on the question of who would be allied with whom and, by implication, against whom in some fanciful, totally unforeseeable and most improbable future military conflict?”

    “[B]luntly stated…expanding NATO would be the most fateful error of American policy in the entire post-Cold War era. Such a decision may be expected to inflame the nationalistic, anti-Western and militaristic tendencies in Russian opinion; to have an adverse effect on the development of Russian democracy; to restore the atmosphere of the cold war to East-West relations, and to impel Russian foreign policy in directions decidedly not to our liking … ”

    They were not literally impelled to invade Ukraine of course; they could have decided failure to maintains Russia’s position was less bad that being morally turpitude of an invasion.

    • Replies: @LatW
    @Sean


    I think the 2008 invasion of Georgia, the 2014 hybrid war in Donbass and annexation of Crimea, and the 2022 full scale assaults on Kiev show that, whatever rights those countries thought international law gave them to make whatever alliances they wished without reference to Russia there always was a brute force veto if the Russians dared use it.
     
    You're essentially admitting that international law doesn't work. The question is why are others then obligated to abide by it? Especially at home. Basically what follows from what you're saying is that in the current environment of the non-existent or unenforceable international law, any nation that cares about its safety and survival should be allowed to introduce whatever laws they see fit (or what serves their interests). And this is a road to fascist states (for those who can pull it off).

    States such as Israel, that are continuously at war (and this is what this would be, if we accept your stance), are very rare, since Israel managed to maintain a democratic system, despite being at war. Do not count on most states being able to pull this off. Israel, too, at one point could've turned into a dictatorship.

    So based on what you are saying, what follows from it, is that the Ukrainian nation has full rights to act as they see fit in order to secure the survival of their people. At their own risk, of course.

    Replies: @Sean, @Wokechoke

    , @Mr. XYZ
    @Sean


    Apart from Russia which was explicitly told it could not join the EU, and found it there was an unspoken agreement it was not allowed to join NATO.
     
    When you're assassinating your critics, that's sort of what happens.

    Surely it is better to have the Russian veto formalized as belonging to an autonomous regions of Russian speaking Ukrainians in the constitutional arrangements of the country so it could live in peace than proceeding as if Russia would be forced to swallow it because it ethically ought to? It might have but it was barely possible in the real world.

     

    Should Serbia and Poland have capitulated to Austria-Hungary and Nazi Germany in 1914 and 1939, respectively, in an attempt to save lives?

    Replies: @Sean

  938. AP says:
    @Coconuts
    @AP

    Ha, I live in one of the most dangerous areas.

    Some of that Reuters reporting may not be 100% representative of what those cities are like.

    I have a friend who is a civil engineer in Manchester; they live in one of the Manchester suburbs that has similar house prices and income levels to the Home Counties around London:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hale_Barns

    This must be where some of the start-up wealth ends up.

    Replies: @AP

    Ha, I live in one of the most dangerous areas.

    My condolences. Well, ut has at least produced some great music. And one of the best commenters here 🙂

    I have a friend who is a civil engineer in Manchester; they live in one of the Manchester suburbs that has similar house prices and income levels to the Home Counties around London

    Your friend probably didn’t get his degree from a third rate Soviet institute and didn’t come over to work construction or whatever because the shambolic state that produced him and that he still supports collapsed..

    There are some very nice areas around Detroit also (engineers in the auto industry have high incomes), yet overall the place is a shithole. It has, like Manchester, produced some great music though.

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @AP

    You really are a piece of work.

    , @Mr. XYZ
    @AP


    There are some very nice areas around Detroit also (engineers in the auto industry have high incomes), yet overall the place is a shithole. It has, like Manchester, produced some great music though.

     

    I would presume that heavily white suburbs of Detroit such as Livonia are fairly nice. AFAIK, most Detroit suburbs are heavily white. The ones that aren't are probably significantly less pleasant.

    Replies: @John Johnson

  939. @Mikhail
    @AP

    Prominent Ukrainian-American activist Lev Dobriansky didn't speak Ukrainian. Mercouris, Kissinger, Mearsheimer and a number of other foreign policy hands don't speak Russian. In that category, numerous fluent Russian speakers in academia, media and body politic value the input of such folks. Fluent linguists don't necessarily make for good analytical minds.

    Replies: @AP, @Emil Nikola Richard

    Guess what? You are no Kissinger.

    • Replies: @Mikhail
    @AP

    Much closer to him on foreign policy IQ than you are for sure.

    Replies: @AP

  940. @LatW
    @Wokechoke


    You stated that you wouldn’t mind the erasure of a white Europe as long as the darkies who inherited it would keep speaking Latvian in your particular corner of Europe. Just economics you said.
     
    I never said anything like that. What I may have said is that it doesn't matter if a country is in the EU or not, once a country reaches a certain level of GDP per capita, it will have this issue. And that this is a global economic phenomenon.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Wokechoke

    Yes you did.

    SFC

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @Wokechoke

    France be like:

    https://youtu.be/vRunUkdkK8s

    Twenty years ago it was a single cité neighborhood that was touched by violence. Ten years ago several at once were enflamed. Five years ago it were entire towns. Now it is multiple towns accross the country.

    These kids were born there, their parents probably were born there. They don't belong in Maghreb or Sub-Saharan Africa anymore, they barely know the language of their ancestors, they don't follow the traditional rules, don't adopt traditional roles. But they don't belong in France either. Their integration is impossible.

    They have already built a destructive social niche of their own making in which they have been confined by the social pressure and prejudice. These places are pressure-cookers, high pressure reactors that keep on producing nihilistic violence.

    BTW, I watched the video of the cop gunning down this Maghrebi kid, Naël, Nahel or whatever was his name. The cop didn't have to do that, he was not threatened at all. I guess the cop is more than fed up with these kids. Working in these neighborhoods is probably a terrible experience.

    Sad for all parties involved.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Wokechoke

  941. Hopefully this pro-Ukrainian US Republican is correct. Seems so, but as usual I am cautious:

    [MORE]

  942. @AP
    @Coconuts


    Ha, I live in one of the most dangerous areas.

     

    My condolences. Well, ut has at least produced some great music. And one of the best commenters here :-)

    I have a friend who is a civil engineer in Manchester; they live in one of the Manchester suburbs that has similar house prices and income levels to the Home Counties around London

     

    Your friend probably didn’t get his degree from a third rate Soviet institute and didn’t come over to work construction or whatever because the shambolic state that produced him and that he still supports collapsed..

    There are some very nice areas around Detroit also (engineers in the auto industry have high incomes), yet overall the place is a shithole. It has, like Manchester, produced some great music though.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @Mr. XYZ

    You really are a piece of work.

  943. @AP
    @Mikel

    I don't understand the anger towards Greta. She's a mentally ill teenager who had been exploited by various people. She might be getting more common sense as she matures, as shown by her turn towards nuclear. Hopefully she recovers.

    JJ is partisan but he is usually right and therefore is not in the same league as creatures such as Ritter.

    Replies: @Mikel, @Emil Nikola Richard

    E. Michael Jones has the most hilarious greta therber gossip. Apparently she was a model child before all her classmates hit puberty and her tits didn’t grow and it all could have been fixed with a small strategically timed boob job which her high IQ rich parents could have easily afforded if they possessed one clue.

    • Replies: @Anatoly Karlin
    @Emil Nikola Richard


    She’s a mentally ill teenager who had been exploited by various people.
     

    ... her high IQ rich parents could have easily afforded if they possessed one clue.
     
    Greta is a global moral authority and incredible magnet for elite human capital. She was a serial truant at school to pursue her passions, which is cool and based. Prestigious Presidents seek audiences with her.

    EMJ is a far right Catholic reactionary who posts about the tits of teenaged girls on obscure webzines.

    Compare "life trajectories", as it were. Right-wingers are a funny lot - can't deny them that.
  944. @Coconuts
    @Mr. Hack

    Iirc Scotland has the most redheads, then Ireland is somewhere with Udmurts people in terms of the number. I might be wrong, just going from what I can remember.

    Many redheads wherever they are found seem to resemble each other in some way.

    Replies: @QCIC, @Wokechoke

    The Outer hebrides is the core of the the Phenotype. There are pockets in Norway too.

  945. @Mikhail
    @AP

    Prominent Ukrainian-American activist Lev Dobriansky didn't speak Ukrainian. Mercouris, Kissinger, Mearsheimer and a number of other foreign policy hands don't speak Russian. In that category, numerous fluent Russian speakers in academia, media and body politic value the input of such folks. Fluent linguists don't necessarily make for good analytical minds.

    Replies: @AP, @Emil Nikola Richard

    When I asked google “does Alexander Mercouris speak Russian?” there was no answer on the first page. Previously I was informed or misinformed that he was competent in Russian and the selling point on his podcast was he reads Russian and watches the Russian social media channels.

    • Replies: @Mikhail
    @Emil Nikola Richard

    You can read Russian via translation. Ritter and Macgregor don't speak Russian. They know a heck of a lot more about the military situation than the likes of Ioffe and Gessen.

  946. @Wokechoke
    @LatW

    Yes you did.


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0vbXCHMadeA


    SFC

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

    France be like:

    Twenty years ago it was a single cité neighborhood that was touched by violence. Ten years ago several at once were enflamed. Five years ago it were entire towns. Now it is multiple towns accross the country.

    These kids were born there, their parents probably were born there. They don’t belong in Maghreb or Sub-Saharan Africa anymore, they barely know the language of their ancestors, they don’t follow the traditional rules, don’t adopt traditional roles. But they don’t belong in France either. Their integration is impossible.

    They have already built a destructive social niche of their own making in which they have been confined by the social pressure and prejudice. These places are pressure-cookers, high pressure reactors that keep on producing nihilistic violence.

    BTW, I watched the video of the cop gunning down this Maghrebi kid, Naël, Nahel or whatever was his name. The cop didn’t have to do that, he was not threatened at all. I guess the cop is more than fed up with these kids. Working in these neighborhoods is probably a terrible experience.

    Sad for all parties involved.

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @Ivashka the fool

    https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/france-deploys-45000-police-armored-vehicles-amid-riots-2023-07-01/

    45000 armed police, armored vehicles, helicopters.

    What's next, fighter jets ?

    And there is no solution to this problem. Even if the right political parties are in charge. You can't just send expell millions of French citizens and send them to Africa. Besides, France only has a reproduction level demographics because of the people of immigrant descent. It would be aging relatively rapidly without them.

    The only solution is education, which was a strong side of the French society for hundreds of years. But education is broken nowadays. In these communities l, it is no longer able to form a valuable representation of an educated and well integrated citizen. These kids see teachers as mediocre people that need not be respected and their society as a hedonistic, nihilistic, hypocrite place, where only money and wealth are important.

    They cannot possibly respect such a place.

    Replies: @A123, @silviosilver, @Sean

    , @Wokechoke
    @Ivashka the fool

    Nahel was a no good son of a whore who had it coming.

  947. A123 says: • Website
    @Coconuts
    @A123


    The riots are being described as the worst violence the country has seen since the nationwide riots in 2005
     
    There is a clue in this part that France is unlikely to fall, OTOH some of the commentary I've listened to does talk in strong terms, about 'a situation of violence developing that it will be hard to put a name to'.

    I think France already had an issue with political and social divisions leading to civil strife before mass immigration. These disturbances would be another indication this old tendency has been given a new lease of life.

    Lasting deep political divisions among the Français de souche population may be one of the blocks on stronger action against immigration.

    In other news, in the UK it seems Nigel Farage's bank recently tried to take his accounts away, and no bank would allow him to open a new one:

    https://www.spiked-online.com/2023/06/30/nigel-farage-and-the-corporate-war-on-dissent/

    Interesting given that he is one of the best known and most controversial politicians in Britain.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @A123

    There is a clue in this part that France is unlikely to fall, OTOH some of the commentary I’ve listened to does talk in strong terms, about ‘a situation of violence developing that it will be hard to put a name to’. I think France already had an issue with political and social divisions leading to civil strife before mass immigration. These disturbances would be another indication this old tendency has been given a new lease of life.

    There are critical differences this time around. Macron is an exceedingly weak leader. And, his administration targeted the police. This has consequences: (1)

    Social unrest spread like cancer across French cities for a fourth consecutive night, with hundreds of buildings and vehicles set ablaze. President Emmanuel Macron’s government struggled to contain the violence, which was sparked on Tuesday after a teenager was shot dead by a police officer.

    In an update on Saturday, France’s Interior Ministry said 2,500 fires were reported overnight. Rioters set fire to 1,350 vehicles and 235 buildings nationwide. About 1,300 people were arrested, while the government mobilized 45,000 police officers with armored vehicles to quell the violence.

    According to The Telegraph, French police said they were “at war” with “savage hordes of vermin” on Friday night. The country’s top police unions threatened revolt unless Macron’s government restored law and order.

    There are new videos in the linked article.

    The police recognize the issue and are going to change strategy to protect themselves if Macron does not respond effectively. Will migrant areas be cordoned off and left to burn? That is the obvious choice to save the lives of French policemen.

    PEACE 😇
    __________

    (1) https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/french-police-say-were-war-vermin-nationwide-riots-spread-cancer

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @A123


    Will migrant areas be cordoned off and left to burn? That is the obvious choice to save the lives of French policemen.
     
    These rioters are not migrants. They were born there, with their parents most probably born there. They are French citizens of legal immigrant descent. Just like your ancestors were immigrants to America, Australia or wherever you live in.

    Problem is, they are very hard, nearly impossible to integrate and assimilate. There are too many of them and the French society is dysfunctional because of its decaying morals. It is an old and rotten society, while these kids are energetic and passionate.

    Same with RusFed and its Central Asian gastarbaiters or its DICh youth.

    These kids are the future.

    If they organize enough they will represent a force to be acknowledged, just like Barbarians have become in the decaying Roman Empire.

    Replies: @AP, @Coconuts

  948. @Ivashka the fool
    @Wokechoke

    France be like:

    https://youtu.be/vRunUkdkK8s

    Twenty years ago it was a single cité neighborhood that was touched by violence. Ten years ago several at once were enflamed. Five years ago it were entire towns. Now it is multiple towns accross the country.

    These kids were born there, their parents probably were born there. They don't belong in Maghreb or Sub-Saharan Africa anymore, they barely know the language of their ancestors, they don't follow the traditional rules, don't adopt traditional roles. But they don't belong in France either. Their integration is impossible.

    They have already built a destructive social niche of their own making in which they have been confined by the social pressure and prejudice. These places are pressure-cookers, high pressure reactors that keep on producing nihilistic violence.

    BTW, I watched the video of the cop gunning down this Maghrebi kid, Naël, Nahel or whatever was his name. The cop didn't have to do that, he was not threatened at all. I guess the cop is more than fed up with these kids. Working in these neighborhoods is probably a terrible experience.

    Sad for all parties involved.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Wokechoke

    https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/france-deploys-45000-police-armored-vehicles-amid-riots-2023-07-01/

    45000 armed police, armored vehicles, helicopters.

    What’s next, fighter jets ?

    And there is no solution to this problem. Even if the right political parties are in charge. You can’t just send expell millions of French citizens and send them to Africa. Besides, France only has a reproduction level demographics because of the people of immigrant descent. It would be aging relatively rapidly without them.

    The only solution is education, which was a strong side of the French society for hundreds of years. But education is broken nowadays. In these communities l, it is no longer able to form a valuable representation of an educated and well integrated citizen. These kids see teachers as mediocre people that need not be respected and their society as a hedonistic, nihilistic, hypocrite place, where only money and wealth are important.

    They cannot possibly respect such a place.

    • Replies: @A123
    @Ivashka the fool

    The key to successful migration is assimilation. Education is part of this, but not the whole story.

    Those refusing to assimilate have to be de-migrated. The nation has to strip citizenship from those incapable of being French, and then send them somewhere. There is no reason not to send them back to their homelands in Africa.

    Yes. The problem looks monumental. Maybe it is too late for successful de-Islamification. However, Not Trying Guarantees Failure.
    ___

    If work pays more and it is easier to raise children... Natives will have more of them. Restricting migration to Christians capable of assimilation can be used if more population is deemed essential.

    In many ways, the biggest impediment is EU Schengen. If one country goes bad, there are few opportunities for other nations to protect their assimilation requirements, labour markets, and family formation.

    PEACE 😇

    , @silviosilver
    @Ivashka the fool


    Even if the right political parties are in charge. You can’t just send expell millions of French citizens and send them to Africa.
     
    Well, let's not be so hasty. With the will and a long-term vision, it may yet prove possible. I mean, if the French could leave Algeria, why can't Algerians leave France? In the shorter term, I'd aim for a "communitarian" solution that recognizes and respects cultural differences - enough silly pretending that all French citizens are French in the same way.

    Besides, France only has a reproduction level demographics because of the people of immigrant descent. It would be aging relatively rapidly without them.
     
    No population can go on expanding forever. If you want to stabilize, then you're going to face the same issue of "aging relatively rapidly" at some future point (albeit perhaps not quite as fast if you're nearer to 2.0 fertility). Now is as good a time as any to face that reality.

    And how the fuck is not obvious that you're better off with an aging populace of your own people - or at least people who don't actively disdain you - than with a young population of culturally and racially hostile arab and afro muzzes?

    (Yes, I am angry with you for posting this utter tommyrot. Angry and astounded. After all, you are the big Mr. Bloodlines around here. Fascinating how quickly that went out the window. )

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @LatW

    , @Sean
    @Ivashka the fool


    It would be aging relatively rapidly without them
     
    What are the advantages of a growing population of ever younger people for a country such as France that is not planning on fighting an existential war and is post industrial?

    It seems to me the business class reaps the benefits, inasmuch as it stops wages rising in jobs that cannot be offshored (construction service industry occupations), and because the growth is all immigrant descended it inhibits working class cohesion and organisation. Reserve armies of immigrant descended labour are already at a loose end and making their own entertainment; with coming automisation from AI the unemployment among them will only get worse.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

  949. @A123
    @Coconuts


    There is a clue in this part that France is unlikely to fall, OTOH some of the commentary I’ve listened to does talk in strong terms, about ‘a situation of violence developing that it will be hard to put a name to’. I think France already had an issue with political and social divisions leading to civil strife before mass immigration. These disturbances would be another indication this old tendency has been given a new lease of life.

     

    There are critical differences this time around. Macron is an exceedingly weak leader. And, his administration targeted the police. This has consequences: (1)

    Social unrest spread like cancer across French cities for a fourth consecutive night, with hundreds of buildings and vehicles set ablaze. President Emmanuel Macron's government struggled to contain the violence, which was sparked on Tuesday after a teenager was shot dead by a police officer.

    In an update on Saturday, France's Interior Ministry said 2,500 fires were reported overnight. Rioters set fire to 1,350 vehicles and 235 buildings nationwide. About 1,300 people were arrested, while the government mobilized 45,000 police officers with armored vehicles to quell the violence.

    According to The Telegraph, French police said they were "at war" with "savage hordes of vermin" on Friday night. The country's top police unions threatened revolt unless Macron's government restored law and order.
     
    There are new videos in the linked article.

    The police recognize the issue and are going to change strategy to protect themselves if Macron does not respond effectively. Will migrant areas be cordoned off and left to burn? That is the obvious choice to save the lives of French policemen.

    PEACE 😇
    __________

    (1) https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/french-police-say-were-war-vermin-nationwide-riots-spread-cancer

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

    Will migrant areas be cordoned off and left to burn? That is the obvious choice to save the lives of French policemen.

    These rioters are not migrants. They were born there, with their parents most probably born there. They are French citizens of legal immigrant descent. Just like your ancestors were immigrants to America, Australia or wherever you live in.

    Problem is, they are very hard, nearly impossible to integrate and assimilate. There are too many of them and the French society is dysfunctional because of its decaying morals. It is an old and rotten society, while these kids are energetic and passionate.

    Same with RusFed and its Central Asian gastarbaiters or its DICh youth.

    These kids are the future.

    If they organize enough they will represent a force to be acknowledged, just like Barbarians have become in the decaying Roman Empire.

    • Replies: @AP
    @Ivashka the fool


    These rioters are not migrants. They were born there, with their parents most probably born there. They are French citizens of legal immigrant descent. Just like your ancestors were immigrants to America, Australia or wherever you live in.
     
    They are born in someone else's homeland, and are behaving as insolent guests.

    They should be expelled, as Europeans were expelled from Africa (even those born there, such as pied noir whose roots in Algeria were deeper than those of these vandals and who had contributed more to their adoptive homeland than these parasites have done).

    Not all of them, but anyone participating in the riots in any way.

    A good thing about these riots is that they highlight to everyone that it is bad to allow non-Europeans to settle in Europe. The Polish PM has already mentioned them. The riots will make it easier for the non-Muslim part of Europe to stay clean and health. In that way they are like a vaccine.

    Problem is, they are very hard, nearly impossible to integrate and assimilate.
     
    All the more reason to remove them.

    Polish PM Morawiecki:

    "Our plan is a Europe of Secure Borders - security and public order - these are the values ​​from which everything else begins!"

    He posts a video contrasting France with peaceful Poland:

    The caption at the end of the video states - "we don't want such scene on Polish streets, safety of Poles above all"



    https://twitter.com/MorawieckiM/status/1674855346387537920?s=20

    Replies: @Anatoly Karlin, @Ivashka the fool, @Mr. XYZ, @Mr. XYZ, @Mr. XYZ, @Gerard1234

    , @Coconuts
    @Ivashka the fool


    Problem is, they are very hard, nearly impossible to integrate and assimilate. There are too many of them and the French society is dysfunctional because of its decaying morals. It is an old and rotten society, while these kids are energetic and passionate.
     
    Probably one of the problems with the idea of integration, whether in France or Britain, has been that no one had any contingency plans about what to do if it didn't happen naturally and pretty spontaneously.

    Now I would agree that there doesn't seem to be any political force in France that has the will or capability to implement something like this. It looks like the 'old French' on the right are becoming less interested in making any concessions and the left are getting influenced by Anglo trends:

    https://www.amazon.co.uk/Wokisme-serait-totalitarisme-Nathalie-Heinich/dp/2226485791/ref=sr_1_2?crid=2ULGZYQIC0D23&keywords=Nathalie+Militantisme+Recherche&qid=1688247468&s=books&sprefix=nathalie+militantisme+recherch%2Cstripbooks%2C858&sr=1-2

    I think one of the better anti-Woke books for a broad audience, the author knows the original French sources and debates in sociology. But the new 'Anglo-Saxon communitarianism' is obviously gaining ground on the left and in academia. If it managed to alter the traditional Republican citizenship tradition in France itself that would be a big thing.

    Imo the risk would be that there is still enough vitality among the old French to hold out against any major change and to reinforce the police, but not enough to resolve the problem, so the riots keep recurring, maybe getting gradually more serious and edgy each time. The fact that civil disorder from other parts of the population keeps happening simultaneously doesn't help. Spread of Woke could just make the problems insoluble.

  950. A123 says: • Website
    @Ivashka the fool
    @Ivashka the fool

    https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/france-deploys-45000-police-armored-vehicles-amid-riots-2023-07-01/

    45000 armed police, armored vehicles, helicopters.

    What's next, fighter jets ?

    And there is no solution to this problem. Even if the right political parties are in charge. You can't just send expell millions of French citizens and send them to Africa. Besides, France only has a reproduction level demographics because of the people of immigrant descent. It would be aging relatively rapidly without them.

    The only solution is education, which was a strong side of the French society for hundreds of years. But education is broken nowadays. In these communities l, it is no longer able to form a valuable representation of an educated and well integrated citizen. These kids see teachers as mediocre people that need not be respected and their society as a hedonistic, nihilistic, hypocrite place, where only money and wealth are important.

    They cannot possibly respect such a place.

    Replies: @A123, @silviosilver, @Sean

    The key to successful migration is assimilation. Education is part of this, but not the whole story.

    Those refusing to assimilate have to be de-migrated. The nation has to strip citizenship from those incapable of being French, and then send them somewhere. There is no reason not to send them back to their homelands in Africa.

    Yes. The problem looks monumental. Maybe it is too late for successful de-Islamification. However, Not Trying Guarantees Failure.
    ___

    If work pays more and it is easier to raise children… Natives will have more of them. Restricting migration to Christians capable of assimilation can be used if more population is deemed essential.

    In many ways, the biggest impediment is EU Schengen. If one country goes bad, there are few opportunities for other nations to protect their assimilation requirements, labour markets, and family formation.

    PEACE 😇

  951. @Mr. XYZ
    @AP


    and entered the ranks of the most industrialized powers.
     
    Not on a per capita basis. Not anywhere close, in fact. On a total basis, possibly (due to its sheer population), but it was still behind the US, UK, and Germany.

    but by 1914 it had improved sufficiently that it had defeated both Austria-Hungary and the Ottoman Empire,
     
    Russia was not powerful enough to stop the Armenian Genocide, though. The smarter diplomatic move on Russia's part would have been to offer territorial concessions to the Ottoman Empire (a return of some or all of the territories that it took from the Ottomans back in 1877-1878) in exchange for Ottoman neutrality during WWI. This would have likely prevented the Armenian Genocide (since the Ottomans would not have wanted Russian intervention) and might have kept the Straits open, which, if so, would have allowed the Western Entente Powers to send large amounts of aid to Russia, thus possibly preventing one or both Russian Revolutions in 1917 and allowing Russia to win WWI faster due to Russia not having the distraction of the Ottoman Front.

    Russia did a miserable job in WWI in maintaining order on the home front, even in comparison to other countries with a similar level of development such as Austria-Hungary, Italy, and the Ottoman Empire. Russia experienced two revolutions in the middle of WWI while none of the other three countries mentioned above did.

    No ruler of Russia after Nicholas has been better than Nicholas. Lenin and Stalin killed millions of Russians in peacetime (even more than were lost during World War I), and Stalin’s mistakes versus little Germany cost tens of millions more (those two criminals squandered Russia’s meteoric rise), Khrushchev and Brezhnev and oversaw modest improvement followed by stagnation, Gorbachev and Yeltsin oversaw collapse, Putin showed decent recovery but has thrown it all away.
     
    Andropov?

    Also, Gorbachev was good for the Balts and, long-term*, for Ukrainians as well. They might not have reacquired their independence without him. Less so for Russians, unfortunately.

    *Because Ukrainians still largely had a Sovok mentality post-independence (unlike the Balts), they weren't quite sure what they were supposed to do with their independence for the next 20+ years. But thankfully this appears to be significantly changing by now.

    It’s worse. Not only is Putin’s war against a much smaller and weaker country, but the Russian Empire lost 43,000-70,000 dead total due to KIA, fatal wounds and disease against Japan. Despite the existence of modern medicine, Russia has managed to lose more dead versus Ukraine (full number is unknown but it was around 30,000 in December before Bakhmut and the newest offensive, so must be at least 80,000 and probably over 100,000 by now).
     
    Worth noting that Russia's war against Japan was utterly irrelevant in the grand scheme of things. Losing south Sakhalin meant nothing to Russia long-term. Ditto for losing Manchuria.

    Replies: @Wokechoke

    Britain experienced the easter Rising which effectively sheered away Ireland in 1916. That’s a large segment of the Home Islands as they were then understood. Also There was the Curragh Mutiny in 1913 or thereabouts. Where the protestant officers stationed and settled in Ireland rebelled.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curragh_incident

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Easter_Rising

    Great Britain was much reduced by this trouble. Much more so than was Germany was reduced in sense.

  952. @Ivashka the fool
    @Wokechoke

    France be like:

    https://youtu.be/vRunUkdkK8s

    Twenty years ago it was a single cité neighborhood that was touched by violence. Ten years ago several at once were enflamed. Five years ago it were entire towns. Now it is multiple towns accross the country.

    These kids were born there, their parents probably were born there. They don't belong in Maghreb or Sub-Saharan Africa anymore, they barely know the language of their ancestors, they don't follow the traditional rules, don't adopt traditional roles. But they don't belong in France either. Their integration is impossible.

    They have already built a destructive social niche of their own making in which they have been confined by the social pressure and prejudice. These places are pressure-cookers, high pressure reactors that keep on producing nihilistic violence.

    BTW, I watched the video of the cop gunning down this Maghrebi kid, Naël, Nahel or whatever was his name. The cop didn't have to do that, he was not threatened at all. I guess the cop is more than fed up with these kids. Working in these neighborhoods is probably a terrible experience.

    Sad for all parties involved.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Wokechoke

    Nahel was a no good son of a whore who had it coming.

  953. @Ivashka the fool
    @Ivashka the fool

    https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/france-deploys-45000-police-armored-vehicles-amid-riots-2023-07-01/

    45000 armed police, armored vehicles, helicopters.

    What's next, fighter jets ?

    And there is no solution to this problem. Even if the right political parties are in charge. You can't just send expell millions of French citizens and send them to Africa. Besides, France only has a reproduction level demographics because of the people of immigrant descent. It would be aging relatively rapidly without them.

    The only solution is education, which was a strong side of the French society for hundreds of years. But education is broken nowadays. In these communities l, it is no longer able to form a valuable representation of an educated and well integrated citizen. These kids see teachers as mediocre people that need not be respected and their society as a hedonistic, nihilistic, hypocrite place, where only money and wealth are important.

    They cannot possibly respect such a place.

    Replies: @A123, @silviosilver, @Sean

    Even if the right political parties are in charge. You can’t just send expell millions of French citizens and send them to Africa.

    Well, let’s not be so hasty. With the will and a long-term vision, it may yet prove possible. I mean, if the French could leave Algeria, why can’t Algerians leave France? In the shorter term, I’d aim for a “communitarian” solution that recognizes and respects cultural differences – enough silly pretending that all French citizens are French in the same way.

    Besides, France only has a reproduction level demographics because of the people of immigrant descent. It would be aging relatively rapidly without them.

    No population can go on expanding forever. If you want to stabilize, then you’re going to face the same issue of “aging relatively rapidly” at some future point (albeit perhaps not quite as fast if you’re nearer to 2.0 fertility). Now is as good a time as any to face that reality.

    And how the fuck is not obvious that you’re better off with an aging populace of your own people – or at least people who don’t actively disdain you – than with a young population of culturally and racially hostile arab and afro muzzes?

    (Yes, I am angry with you for posting this utter tommyrot. Angry and astounded. After all, you are the big Mr. Bloodlines around here. Fascinating how quickly that went out the window. )

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @silviosilver

    I don't understand why you're angry with what I posted. I am simply describing what is the situation nowadays. If we should be angry with anyone, it would be with those who enabled the eroding of the European peoples and the atomization of their societies. Those are the culprits. Not me.

    And yes, I would wish to live in a World where anyone would stay more or less where one was born, me included. But we're way post that point nowadays. The effects of Globalization are probably irreversible.

    France is not and never be again the place I discovered decades ago. I saw it change and it was not a pleasant sight. I think it will go further and will be way more damaging still. But we have to remember that these kids' violence is a consequence. The cause is something else entirely.

    Replies: @A123, @silviosilver

    , @LatW
    @silviosilver


    Well, let’s not be so hasty. With the will and a long-term vision, it may yet prove possible.
     
    It is totally possible, but there would need to be a more methodical approach. Early intervention. Maybe loyalty tests. There would have to be political consensus across a wide coalition.

    The biggest issue is probably not even the physical aspect, but the degradation of citizenship. Massive stripping of citizenship degrades the institution of citizenship, same as massive granting of citizenship (and is legally complex, although even that could be worked around). But at some point it might have to be done. Because it is such a huge mental hurdle to overcome, this is where the main bulk of the work could lie.

    As to the physical part (without going into more detail, since that is not safe), a formation of voluntary militias is a good option, as always. Of course, some will have to be sacrificed, but they will become venerated martyrs.

    In the light of this, it looks like in the future there could be a lot of "unneeded" people who wonder around the world without a sense of belonging. Maybe there should be special "network states" for them, hahahaha! :)

  954. AP says:
    @Ivashka the fool
    @A123


    Will migrant areas be cordoned off and left to burn? That is the obvious choice to save the lives of French policemen.
     
    These rioters are not migrants. They were born there, with their parents most probably born there. They are French citizens of legal immigrant descent. Just like your ancestors were immigrants to America, Australia or wherever you live in.

    Problem is, they are very hard, nearly impossible to integrate and assimilate. There are too many of them and the French society is dysfunctional because of its decaying morals. It is an old and rotten society, while these kids are energetic and passionate.

    Same with RusFed and its Central Asian gastarbaiters or its DICh youth.

    These kids are the future.

    If they organize enough they will represent a force to be acknowledged, just like Barbarians have become in the decaying Roman Empire.

    Replies: @AP, @Coconuts

    These rioters are not migrants. They were born there, with their parents most probably born there. They are French citizens of legal immigrant descent. Just like your ancestors were immigrants to America, Australia or wherever you live in.

    They are born in someone else’s homeland, and are behaving as insolent guests.

    They should be expelled, as Europeans were expelled from Africa (even those born there, such as pied noir whose roots in Algeria were deeper than those of these vandals and who had contributed more to their adoptive homeland than these parasites have done).

    Not all of them, but anyone participating in the riots in any way.

    A good thing about these riots is that they highlight to everyone that it is bad to allow non-Europeans to settle in Europe. The Polish PM has already mentioned them. The riots will make it easier for the non-Muslim part of Europe to stay clean and health. In that way they are like a vaccine.

    Problem is, they are very hard, nearly impossible to integrate and assimilate.

    All the more reason to remove them.

    Polish PM Morawiecki:

    “Our plan is a Europe of Secure Borders – security and public order – these are the values ​​from which everything else begins!”

    He posts a video contrasting France with peaceful Poland:

    The caption at the end of the video states – “we don’t want such scene on Polish streets, safety of Poles above all”

    [MORE]

    • LOL: Wokechoke
    • Replies: @Anatoly Karlin
    @AP

    Morawiecki is a thug who has the blood of Polish womyn on his hands.

    EHC rejects clerical fascism.

    Replies: @AP, @Mr. XYZ

    , @Ivashka the fool
    @AP

    Les pieds noirs didn't recognize themselves as Algerian or African. In fact, to be more precise, they had just started to culturally evolve in that direction, something that Afrikaners have also done in South Africa. If they would have stayed a few generations more and would have found a level of common understanding with the Muslim majority, the situation would have been different. L'étranger by Camus described this society well. He was un pied noir after all.

    The conflict in Algeria was due to French citizens of Christian and Jewish descent having different and higher level of citizenship rights than les Français musulmans, which was the way the Algerian-born Maghrebi Muslims were known in the French Republic before the Algerian independence.

    The kids in the banlieues don't object to being French citizens and to having exactly the same citizenship rights guaranteed to them. They're born there and have no other country. It's their homeland, they're alien to the Maghreb and Mali/Nigeri/Whatever.

    The real problem is that they are rootless products of Globalization, Deleuze and Guattari were right about the déterritorialisation & reterritorialisation. These jeunes are now a new social reality. The aging, hedonist and atomized Europe will not get rid of that. It is here to stay.

    Same for Blacks and colored people in North America. In fact the situation there is only somewhat better due to a less rigid and more immigration-centered framework.

    Old Europe is doomed. It's going the way of the dodo bird. And it is not the working class Muslim kids who enabled its demise, but the likes of Von Coudenhove-Kalergi and his Habsburg allies. A pure product of the Austro-Hungarian multicultural milieu that you admire so much.

    https://youtu.be/De40t7ajAAc

    За что боролись, на то и напоролись.

    Ditto for the future of the Noviop RusFed.

    Replies: @Beckow, @AP, @S

    , @Mr. XYZ
    @AP


    They are born in someone else’s homeland, and are behaving as insolent guests.

    They should be expelled, as Europeans were expelled from Africa (even those born there, such as pied noir whose roots in Algeria were deeper than those of these vandals and who had contributed more to their adoptive homeland than these parasites have done).

    Not all of them, but anyone participating in the riots in any way.

    A good thing about these riots is that they highlight to everyone that it is bad to allow non-Europeans to settle in Europe. The Polish PM has already mentioned them. The riots will make it easier for the non-Muslim part of Europe to stay clean and health. In that way they are like a vaccine.
     
    Seems like the primary problem here is with working-class Muslims and Africans, no? I don't seem to recall Hindus, Sikhs, non-Muslim Asians (East Asians, Vietnamese, Thais, Filipinos, et cetera), or Latin Americans causing such problems in Europe. Am I right? So, it really is a couple of groups with excessively large numbers of bad apples rather than non-Europeans as a whole.

    The US allowed large numbers of non-Europeans and partial Europeans to settle in the US since 1965 and it has turned out much better. The US's main problems are with its black descendants of slaves population, not with its immigrants and their descendants. Canada, Australia, and New Zealand also had successful immigration policies, in their cases, tilted more heavily towards cognitive elites than the US's (which also resulted in the importation of a lot of cognitive elites and a lot of working-class Latin Americans as well).
    , @Mr. XYZ
    @AP

    BTW, Ilya Somin (a US Jewish-American law professor of ex-USSR descent) has argued that if certain crimes are sufficiently bad to warrant deportation, then anyone who engages in such crimes should be deported, regardless of their race, ethnicity, birth place, or national origin:

    https://reason.com/volokh/2018/05/27/the-case-against-deporting-immigrants-co/

    He calls such a policy "equal opportunity deportation". So, ethnic Europeans in France who engage in identical or at least similar behavior would also be liable to get deported out of France and the EU. Could have an even more eugenic effect that way, interestingly enough. And would be compatible with egalitarian anti-discrimination principles.

    But of course the challenge would be to actually find some country that would be willing to accept all of these convicted criminals. What exactly are you going to offer this country in exchange for this? And will these convicted criminals have to spend jail time in their new country? If so, just how much jail time? I've heard that prisons in places like Latin America are not exactly safe for prisoners, after all. Latin America is homicidal as fuck, and this applies to its prisons as well.

    , @Mr. XYZ
    @AP

    Also, one more thing: I suspect that it's very possible that the Algerian rebels' radicalism and brutality towards the pieds-noirs had a lot to do with the general brutality of the Algerian War, in which hundreds of thousands of Algerians (including 150,000 Algerian FLN fighters) got killed. Had Algeria been given its independence peacefully in 1954-1956 along with both Tunisia and Morocco, then it's possible that the pieds-noirs would have been allowed to stay in Algeria in exchange for them agreeing to take a loyalty oath to Algeria or something like that. Very far from guaranteed, of course, but more likely than in real life due to less Algerian blood being shed beforehand. Though even in such a scenario, most of the pieds-noirs would have likely subsequently fled from Algeria anyway in the 1990s due to the extremely brutal civil war there, unless that war would have somehow been prevented in this scenario. Though maybe some of them would have eventually returned to Algeria in this scenario after things would have calmed and quieted down there in the 21st century.

    , @Gerard1234
    @AP

    Wow - the levels of horseshit from this fantasist liar are increasing every day. Ukrops have killed more Poles in about 3 days during WW2, than Algerians have killed French in 200 years you dumbfuck. LMAO. Thats including wars, gang violence, any type of criminality causing murder......even high calory Algerian food. Its constantly proved that these two groups of dickheads (Poles and Galician non-citizens) can't live together you prick.

    Maybe ukronazi scum have killed more Poles in 3 hours than Algerians have killed French in 200 years is more accurate. The ratio is even more extreme if we are only talking about civilians.....particularly women, children and the elderly.

    For this Polish PM idiot to say that is disgraceful, and the point retarded.......its a non-entity useless country falsely equivalating its failures into successes, by judging itself on the western standards it cant and won't ever achieve. Like Mauritanians claiming their aerospace industry , or the maintenance part of it, is much superior to America's because they have much less helicopter crashes each year.


    A good thing about these riots is that they highlight to everyone that it is bad to allow non-Europeans to settle in Europe. The Polish PM has already mentioned them. The riots will make it easier for the non-Muslim part of Europe to stay clean and health. In that way they are like a vaccine.

    A good thing about these riots is that they highlight to everyone that it is bad to allow non-Europeans to settle in Europe. The Polish PM has already mentioned them. The riots will make it easier for the non-Muslim part of Europe to stay clean and health. In that way they are like a vaccine.
     
    We have this scumbag "AP" talking about people and places he knows absolutely zero about - Poland, 404, Russia.......must the readers on this blog have to read this dumb sack of shit talking about Algerians?

    Anyway, except for the fact you have f**k all experiance to talk about anything European......Algerians do at least have a middle class in France, many intellectuals, have held big government positions. Ukronazi slave retards under Polish rule, are either toilet cleaners and mass whores ( though the countries with Albanians are "superior" to the Poles in this) like now......or just as bad slaves historicallu who literally make the Samuel L Jackson character in the film Django Unchained, look a huge aspiration for ukrops in Galicia at the time

    Replies: @AP

  955. @Mr. XYZ
    @Mr. Hack

    What are his future hopes for Ukraine?

    Also, in regards to Arizona, what are your thoughts on Phoenix's giant population boom as well as Arizona's rapid Hispanicization over the last several decades?

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

    What are his future hopes for Ukraine?

    He thinks that Putler is a very dangerous bad apple that needs to be removed ASAP, especially because of his toxic sabre rattling that includes the use of nukes. Of course he wishes the best for the Ukrainians including the ability to rule in their own country.

    Also, in regards to Arizona, what are your thoughts on Phoenix’s giant population boom as well as Arizona’s rapid Hispanicization over the last several decades?

    The giant population boom in Phoenix is a pain in the ass, including all of the social problems associated with high traffic, homelessness etc. The inner city schools can be wild places and it’s difficult to keep qualified teachers working within. The pay isn’t great either. You’ll remember me speaking well of the Mexican and Latino community here in my comments in the past. They keep to themselves, work hard, are family oriented and go to church – what’s there not to like? In addition many of their people are quite good looking, I had a dental assistant yesterday help in my teeth cleaning that was way beyond gorgeous.

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @Mr. Hack

    Senoritas? Are you Fred Reed's sockpuppet?

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @QCIC

  956. @Mr. Hack
    @Mr. XYZ


    What are his future hopes for Ukraine?
     
    He thinks that Putler is a very dangerous bad apple that needs to be removed ASAP, especially because of his toxic sabre rattling that includes the use of nukes. Of course he wishes the best for the Ukrainians including the ability to rule in their own country.

    Also, in regards to Arizona, what are your thoughts on Phoenix’s giant population boom as well as Arizona’s rapid Hispanicization over the last several decades?
     
    The giant population boom in Phoenix is a pain in the ass, including all of the social problems associated with high traffic, homelessness etc. The inner city schools can be wild places and it's difficult to keep qualified teachers working within. The pay isn't great either. You'll remember me speaking well of the Mexican and Latino community here in my comments in the past. They keep to themselves, work hard, are family oriented and go to church - what's there not to like? In addition many of their people are quite good looking, I had a dental assistant yesterday help in my teeth cleaning that was way beyond gorgeous.

    Replies: @Wokechoke

    Senoritas? Are you Fred Reed’s sockpuppet?

    • Disagree: QCIC
    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @Wokechoke

    Who needs Fred Reed?

    https://mail-order-bride.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/37-1618922883217.jpg

    Replies: @QCIC

    , @QCIC
    @Wokechoke

    Huge insult to Fred Reed.

    If Hack were a Reed sock puppet the rants would have insightful and humorous content as opposed to the incessant "Slava Ukraine" droning. On the other hand, the name does sound like something Reed might select.

    Has Fred weighed in on the Ukraine mess recently?

  957. @Emil Nikola Richard
    @AP

    E. Michael Jones has the most hilarious greta therber gossip. Apparently she was a model child before all her classmates hit puberty and her tits didn't grow and it all could have been fixed with a small strategically timed boob job which her high IQ rich parents could have easily afforded if they possessed one clue.

    Replies: @Anatoly Karlin

    She’s a mentally ill teenager who had been exploited by various people.

    … her high IQ rich parents could have easily afforded if they possessed one clue.

    Greta is a global moral authority and incredible magnet for elite human capital. She was a serial truant at school to pursue her passions, which is cool and based. Prestigious Presidents seek audiences with her.

    EMJ is a far right Catholic reactionary who posts about the tits of teenaged girls on obscure webzines.

    Compare “life trajectories”, as it were. Right-wingers are a funny lot – can’t deny them that.

  958. @AP
    @Ivashka the fool


    These rioters are not migrants. They were born there, with their parents most probably born there. They are French citizens of legal immigrant descent. Just like your ancestors were immigrants to America, Australia or wherever you live in.
     
    They are born in someone else's homeland, and are behaving as insolent guests.

    They should be expelled, as Europeans were expelled from Africa (even those born there, such as pied noir whose roots in Algeria were deeper than those of these vandals and who had contributed more to their adoptive homeland than these parasites have done).

    Not all of them, but anyone participating in the riots in any way.

    A good thing about these riots is that they highlight to everyone that it is bad to allow non-Europeans to settle in Europe. The Polish PM has already mentioned them. The riots will make it easier for the non-Muslim part of Europe to stay clean and health. In that way they are like a vaccine.

    Problem is, they are very hard, nearly impossible to integrate and assimilate.
     
    All the more reason to remove them.

    Polish PM Morawiecki:

    "Our plan is a Europe of Secure Borders - security and public order - these are the values ​​from which everything else begins!"

    He posts a video contrasting France with peaceful Poland:

    The caption at the end of the video states - "we don't want such scene on Polish streets, safety of Poles above all"



    https://twitter.com/MorawieckiM/status/1674855346387537920?s=20

    Replies: @Anatoly Karlin, @Ivashka the fool, @Mr. XYZ, @Mr. XYZ, @Mr. XYZ, @Gerard1234

    Morawiecki is a thug who has the blood of Polish womyn on his hands.

    EHC rejects clerical fascism.

    • Replies: @AP
    @Anatoly Karlin

    The unfortunate woman's death was the result of the hospital's mistake and not the law. Polish law allows abortion in cases when the woman's life is in danger (otherwise there would be hundreds of such situations).

    , @Mr. XYZ
    @Anatoly Karlin

    Wouldn't Polish right-wing clerical fascism still be much better than Russian nationalism in terms of overall death toll, though? Russian nationalism resulted in over 100,000 people killed as a result of Russia's interventions in Ukraine. Have Polish right-wing clerical fascists even killed several dozen women with their abortion restrictions?

    That's not to say that Polish right-wing clerical fascism isn't bad, only that it is significantly less bad than Russian nationalism is.

  959. @Anatoly Karlin
    @AP

    Morawiecki is a thug who has the blood of Polish womyn on his hands.

    EHC rejects clerical fascism.

    Replies: @AP, @Mr. XYZ

    The unfortunate woman’s death was the result of the hospital’s mistake and not the law. Polish law allows abortion in cases when the woman’s life is in danger (otherwise there would be hundreds of such situations).

  960. @silviosilver
    @Ivashka the fool


    Even if the right political parties are in charge. You can’t just send expell millions of French citizens and send them to Africa.
     
    Well, let's not be so hasty. With the will and a long-term vision, it may yet prove possible. I mean, if the French could leave Algeria, why can't Algerians leave France? In the shorter term, I'd aim for a "communitarian" solution that recognizes and respects cultural differences - enough silly pretending that all French citizens are French in the same way.

    Besides, France only has a reproduction level demographics because of the people of immigrant descent. It would be aging relatively rapidly without them.
     
    No population can go on expanding forever. If you want to stabilize, then you're going to face the same issue of "aging relatively rapidly" at some future point (albeit perhaps not quite as fast if you're nearer to 2.0 fertility). Now is as good a time as any to face that reality.

    And how the fuck is not obvious that you're better off with an aging populace of your own people - or at least people who don't actively disdain you - than with a young population of culturally and racially hostile arab and afro muzzes?

    (Yes, I am angry with you for posting this utter tommyrot. Angry and astounded. After all, you are the big Mr. Bloodlines around here. Fascinating how quickly that went out the window. )

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @LatW

    I don’t understand why you’re angry with what I posted. I am simply describing what is the situation nowadays. If we should be angry with anyone, it would be with those who enabled the eroding of the European peoples and the atomization of their societies. Those are the culprits. Not me.

    And yes, I would wish to live in a World where anyone would stay more or less where one was born, me included. But we’re way post that point nowadays. The effects of Globalization are probably irreversible.

    France is not and never be again the place I discovered decades ago. I saw it change and it was not a pleasant sight. I think it will go further and will be way more damaging still. But we have to remember that these kids’ violence is a consequence. The cause is something else entirely.

    • Replies: @A123
    @Ivashka the fool


    I would wish to live in a World where anyone would stay more or less where one was born, me included. But we’re way post that point nowadays. The effects of Globalization are probably irreversible.
     
    Step #1 in changing "probably irreversible" to "successfully reversed" is trying.

    I understand there are a number of Wagner mercs available for hire. How well would fireworks wielding Allah Ahkbar death screamers do against Wagner APC's? Bring in a force known to be combat effective and deploy them against the enemies of France.

    The problem is likely solvable. Currently missing -- The will to use force en masse to relentlessly enforce involuntary de-Islamification.

    #LetsGoBrandon 😇

    , @silviosilver
    @Ivashka the fool


    If we should be angry with anyone, it would be with those who enabled the eroding of the European peoples and the atomization of their societies.
     
    I was angry with you for attempting to justify it. ("They're injecting youth into an aging society!" "They are fellow citizens!")

    Still, it is only human to try to find something bearable about the conditions we live in, for the sake of our sanity, so that we can dwell on life's more pleasant aspects rather than steel ourselves for a fight.

    Sadly, I cannot see that there are any silver linings to this shitshow.

    Demographically, if the point of no return has indeed been passed, it is still worth pursuing the least bad outcome, and this too requires looking squarely at reality rather than evading it with feelgood fictions.

    Replies: @Yahya, @Ivashka the fool

  961. @Emil Nikola Richard
    @Mikhail

    When I asked google "does Alexander Mercouris speak Russian?" there was no answer on the first page. Previously I was informed or misinformed that he was competent in Russian and the selling point on his podcast was he reads Russian and watches the Russian social media channels.

    Replies: @Mikhail

    You can read Russian via translation. Ritter and Macgregor don’t speak Russian. They know a heck of a lot more about the military situation than the likes of Ioffe and Gessen.

  962. @AP
    @Mikhail

    Guess what? You are no Kissinger.

    Replies: @Mikhail

    Much closer to him on foreign policy IQ than you are for sure.

    • Replies: @AP
    @Mikhail

    You are, instead, close to Ritter.

    Replies: @Mikhail, @QCIC

  963. @Mr. Hack
    @Anatoly Karlin

    Hello again Anatoly! I hope that your latest reincarnation doesn't include shedding your elevated status as a "pepperhead". We used to have some great conversations here on culinary subjects, and you even suggested on a couple of occasions that I look you up if ever in Moscow, that you'd show me around to some of the better restaurants. I'm curious to know whether you'd ever consider moving back somewhere to the West (the US?)? For the longest time you stood firm on remaining in Russia, and I actually lauded you for this, in contrast to all of the other "Russian patriots" that decided to remain patriots but at very distant destinations. If Russian nationalism doesn't matter anymore, I don't see you needing to lock yourself down to any one country anymore?

    And then there's the little thing about you actually censoring out a couple of my comments here just before you left? Very out of character for you, certainly looking back now that you're becoming a super free speech advocate and all. It looks like you've finally moved away from your past attachment to an anachronistic Triunism? All is forgiven, all is good - be well!

    Replies: @Mikhail, @Anatoly Karlin

    Thanks. Yes, and the offer still stands. I’m uninterested in decamping back to the US – it has some attractions as the Western imperial center, but price-to-quality ratio is horrendous for anyone who doesn’t need to physically be there. I still like Russia from a purely price-to-benefits/culture perspective, with Moscow being my favorite city, so it will almost certainly remain my main “base” into the indefinite future. However, as I am again a derooted thing, digital nomadism makes a lot more sense for me.

    I no longer support triunism or any national mythologies or indeed nation-state. “Patriot” is close to “patsy” in the dictionary for a reason. EHC trends towards globalism and the collapse of borders.

    • Thanks: Mr. Hack
    • Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
    @Anatoly Karlin


    There are multiple influencers talking about Million Dollar Bitcoin this year.
     
    https://roundingtheearth.substack.com/p/election-2024-the-bitcoin-presidential
    , @Beckow
    @Anatoly Karlin


    ...the US price-to-quality ratio is horrendous for anyone who doesn’t need to physically be there.
     
    Sure, you like to do the globalist geographic arbitrage as many do. But that comes with a cost: your latter-day embrace of globalism translates into an acceptance of the current Western imperium - and they won't stop at the current borders. Whether you believe in triunism or not, they will come knocking - you are embracing the full package.

    It is unlikely that the globalist Western march will prevail in its endless battles - they have been losing a lot lately. The center is not of the same quality as it was at its peak. Any isolated individual disconnected from family-tribe-nation - you call it "the myths" - will gravitate towards the Western imperium. It is a natural home if you dont belong anywhere and dont have a stake in the future (e.g. no kids).

    That's why the West aggressively promotes the lifestyle of the disconnected global gender-confused nomads - but in the process it has fatally undermined itself. It is usually a good idea to sell a horse before it dies...

    , @QCIC
    @Anatoly Karlin

    Your version of "globalism" seems to be much different than the globalism many people worry about. Are they the same or do you need a different term or concept for your vision?

    If the same, what makes you think this decentralized and possibly anarchic system will be able to pressure those at the top to respect the wishes of even the EHC? The globalist whip holder is probably not EHC in the sense of having any creative potential.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

    , @Mr. Hack
    @Anatoly Karlin

    It's good to see you back here, although some of these new revelations of yours have certainly caught many of your old readers by surprise. AP recently paid you a glowing tribute, mentioning the high caliber of thought that emanated at this blogsite due to your impresario type skills. Your new thoughts are worth exploring.

    , @Mr. XYZ
    @Anatoly Karlin

    You can respond to me in the next open thread if necessary.


    “Patriot” is close to “patsy” in the dictionary for a reason.
     
    Shouldn't EHC like patriotism since it's essentially a more inclusive (big-tent) nationalism? I seem to recall a lot of Americans being concerned about what Trump and his supporters did on January 6, which does indicate that a love of country still remains among many Americans.

    (BTW, big-tent nationalism has a long history. For instance, some pre-Nazi German nationalists were willing to accept assimilated German Jews into their ranks even though they were not ethnic Germans. Likewise, the founder of the Mladorossi Russian nationalist group was of non-Slavic descent: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Lvovich_Kazembek )

    "Look at how great our countries are! Let's invite more people into them so that they could also share in our countries' national glories!" strikes one as a slogan that EHC can get behind, no?

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    , @PetrOldSack
    @Anatoly Karlin

    Thanks Karlin, your suggestions are noted. A nice way to redeem yourself after your Covid19 bout of stubborn-ness.

    Have nation-states compete for your assets as an individual. Separation of body and digital soul. Globalism of human assets is indeed a logical consequence of complex societies. Ill understood, you are quite a fore-runner here.

    Lots of hurdles, crowd sourcing becomes looking for needles in a hay-stack [only ideas with a certain gravity, little texture, static most, are catching on], egos clashing, what about agency cross territorial borders. Choices in mating and breeding into quality oriented produce. Collaboration beyond the digital realm [physical contexts that agency obliges].

    On the positive, prohibit a country to own you. Voting with your feet. ...

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard

  964. QCIC says:
    @Mr. XYZ
    @QCIC

    In terms of placing nuclear missiles (which NATO has no intention of doing but which Russia nevertheless appears to be extremely paranoid about), the Baltics are as threatening to Russia as Ukraine is since the distances to Moscow in both cases are roughly equal.

    Replies: @QCIC, @Beckow

    A key point is aggressive intent by the West. The degree of aggressiveness by both parties in a MAD (mutually assured destruction) scenario establishes the risk. After the fall of the USSR, Russia tried to stay less aggressive while the USA and the West became more aggressive.

    Since Russia and Ukraine have positive historical and cultural ties, Western maneuvering in that country is a much stronger statement of intent than meddling in the Baltics. It shows more chutzpah and is a much clearer sign of mens rea toward Russia than previous Western meddling for the other NATO expansions. For people who don’t understand: Ukraine in NATO is enough of a red line that even Western discussion of adding Ukraine to NATO is very bad, even if the actual implementation is unlikely or drawn out.

    NATO is an anti-Russia, anti-USSR military alliance. Expanding the border of this alliance closer to Russia is inherently an aggressive move.

    Attempting to bring Ukraine into NATO takes this military aggression to a higher level. It is a naked statement of the West’s intention to break up the Russian state, not merely to threaten it.

    • Agree: Beckow
  965. @Mr. XYZ
    @QCIC

    In terms of placing nuclear missiles (which NATO has no intention of doing but which Russia nevertheless appears to be extremely paranoid about), the Baltics are as threatening to Russia as Ukraine is since the distances to Moscow in both cases are roughly equal.

    Replies: @QCIC, @Beckow

    …In terms of placing nuclear missiles which NATO has no intention of doing…

    You are presumably smart enough to know the difference between what can happen and stated intentions: countries – all countries, all the time, incl. US – base their policies on what can happen. Intentions are for birds…here today, changed tomorrow, people lie, etc…Nato tried to deceive Russia after dropping the ABM treaty and then placed missiles in Poland-Romania “against Iran“…come on, let’s be adults.

    We have a war in Europe that can still escalate out of control, a much worse economic, political, even cultural situation. The two sides aren’t talking and they have stopped listening and literally live in two different worlds. Pretending that this is some sort of a one-sided out-of-a-blue Russian aggression is lying.

    The West needs to wake up and stop preaching one-sided nonsense or spout boomer stereotypes. That is stupid. Anyone with a 3-digit IQ understands that Nato has for decades aggressively tried to get a better fighting position vis-a-vis Russia. Ukraine was just the last step – obviously a step too far and Russia finally reacted. Why was Nato and the collective West doing it?

    There is no other rational answer than they hoped at some point to have such overwhelming strategic advantage that they would be able to dictate to Russia. These things are cumulative – you pretending that maybe Russia should had acted in 2003, 2008, 2014…is not really an argument, maybe they were not ready, but who cares?

    Unless Kiev manages to defeat Russia – that is highly unlikely – the Nato lying and games against Russia are over. We either get a newly divided Europe or a gradual soft rollback. Or we go up in smoke. Be serious – after Russia moved in 2022 the ‘weaken and control Russia‘ plan has been dealt a fatal blow. Wait until next time Russia goes through its periodic ennui period and pounce then. Now it simply won’t work.

  966. QCIC says:
    @Coconuts
    @QCIC

    Yeah, I realised after I posted, I should have said apart from the red hair and blue/green eyes.

    Replies: @QCIC

    I was kidding. I think you made a good point. Female redheads often have a distinctive overall look that goes beyond the red hair, eyes and freckles. In other words if they dye their hair one can probably still readily recognize them as natural redheads. This look includes bone structure, thinness, whatever. I think the link between these physical traits is more obvious than similar links in blondes and brunettes.

    • Agree: Coconuts
  967. @AP
    @Ivashka the fool


    These rioters are not migrants. They were born there, with their parents most probably born there. They are French citizens of legal immigrant descent. Just like your ancestors were immigrants to America, Australia or wherever you live in.
     
    They are born in someone else's homeland, and are behaving as insolent guests.

    They should be expelled, as Europeans were expelled from Africa (even those born there, such as pied noir whose roots in Algeria were deeper than those of these vandals and who had contributed more to their adoptive homeland than these parasites have done).

    Not all of them, but anyone participating in the riots in any way.

    A good thing about these riots is that they highlight to everyone that it is bad to allow non-Europeans to settle in Europe. The Polish PM has already mentioned them. The riots will make it easier for the non-Muslim part of Europe to stay clean and health. In that way they are like a vaccine.

    Problem is, they are very hard, nearly impossible to integrate and assimilate.
     
    All the more reason to remove them.

    Polish PM Morawiecki:

    "Our plan is a Europe of Secure Borders - security and public order - these are the values ​​from which everything else begins!"

    He posts a video contrasting France with peaceful Poland:

    The caption at the end of the video states - "we don't want such scene on Polish streets, safety of Poles above all"



    https://twitter.com/MorawieckiM/status/1674855346387537920?s=20

    Replies: @Anatoly Karlin, @Ivashka the fool, @Mr. XYZ, @Mr. XYZ, @Mr. XYZ, @Gerard1234

    Les pieds noirs didn’t recognize themselves as Algerian or African. In fact, to be more precise, they had just started to culturally evolve in that direction, something that Afrikaners have also done in South Africa. If they would have stayed a few generations more and would have found a level of common understanding with the Muslim majority, the situation would have been different. L’étranger by Camus described this society well. He was un pied noir after all.

    The conflict in Algeria was due to French citizens of Christian and Jewish descent having different and higher level of citizenship rights than les Français musulmans, which was the way the Algerian-born Maghrebi Muslims were known in the French Republic before the Algerian independence.

    The kids in the banlieues don’t object to being French citizens and to having exactly the same citizenship rights guaranteed to them. They’re born there and have no other country. It’s their homeland, they’re alien to the Maghreb and Mali/Nigeri/Whatever.

    The real problem is that they are rootless products of Globalization, Deleuze and Guattari were right about the déterritorialisation & reterritorialisation. These jeunes are now a new social reality. The aging, hedonist and atomized Europe will not get rid of that. It is here to stay.

    Same for Blacks and colored people in North America. In fact the situation there is only somewhat better due to a less rigid and more immigration-centered framework.

    Old Europe is doomed. It’s going the way of the dodo bird. And it is not the working class Muslim kids who enabled its demise, but the likes of Von Coudenhove-Kalergi and his Habsburg allies. A pure product of the Austro-Hungarian multicultural milieu that you admire so much.

    За что боролись, на то и напоролись.

    Ditto for the future of the Noviop RusFed.

    • Replies: @Beckow
    @Ivashka the fool


    Old Europe is doomed.
     
    It will take a long time and there are different scenarios. The globalist optimists who run EU want gradual mixing and an emergence of a new deracinated and simplified population: people who are from nowhere, have no sense of solidarity with each others, no firm identity, maybe even fluid gender. The current gender mania is less about the gender itself - that is folklore to distract - and more about erasing any remaining firm boundaries between people, anyone can be anyone: we are all "investors" or "enterpreneurs', 'partners" etc...it makes control easier.

    You have to remember how much the 20th century frightened the elite - they don't want anything like that to ever come back. Can you blame them? They want us to obey.

    More likely scenario is that it won't work - too many loose ends and moving parts. It is likely to gradually collapse into a more chaotic society. Growing chaos means more extreme attempts to force it on people (like right now) or to reverse it. Given the demographic realities it will not work - we will just get more chaos. Maybe a comfortable chaos, but chaos means that there is no coherent future, it is all day-to-day and random.

    I am kind of enjoying it, but in the provinces and we are mostly left alone.

    , @AP
    @Ivashka the fool


    Les pieds noirs didn’t recognize themselves as Algerian or African. In fact, to be more precise, they had just started to culturally evolve in that direction, something that Afrikaners have also done in South Africa.
     
    The humane solution would have been to give them their own homeland in Oran. Compensation for centuries of slave raiding.

    Perhaps these deracinated looters and rioters can be provided with a homeland of some sort, also, away from French cities. Maybe in Algeria, send them there with all their assets, they must have something.

    Old Europe is doomed. It’s going the way of the dodo bird
     
    The pessimism of someone without Faith. Who knows? This might inspire an awakening.

    And it is not the working class Muslim kids who enabled its demise, but the likes of Von Coudenhove-Kalergi and his Habsburg allies. A pure product of the Austro-Hungarian multicultural milieu that you admire so much.
     
    Austria-Hungary was a traditionalist state. It's diversity was pre-nationalist, not post-nationalist. That is a huge difference. Had the correct side won World War I, we would not have such a mess.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Mr. XYZ

    , @S
    @Ivashka the fool


    The real problem is that they are rootless products of Globalization, Deleuze and Guattari were right about the déterritorialisation & reterritorialisation. These jeunes are now a new social reality. The aging, hedonist and atomized Europe will not get rid of that. It is here to stay.
     
    The below excerpt was written and published in the United States in 1898 by Eliot Gregory in regards to the exact nature and character of the future European 'union of states' as he saw it.

    He didn't much like it, to his credit.

    As a grand nephew of James Fenimore Cooper, author of The Last of the Mohicans, and a long time resident of both New York City and Paris, whom directed the Metropolitan Opera Company of New York, Gregory routinely hobnobbed with the rich and powerful members of the US Northeastern establishment. So, I doubt he just concocted this vision entirely off the top of his head, but had probably been more or less told in so many words that this is how things are going to be.

    https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=chi.17436845&view=1up&seq=518


    ‘The social formula of the future will be bitter protection of money interests and local patriotism replaced by a ferocious individualism.’

    The United States of Europe - North American Review (1898)

    ‘..you may be sure that the financiers will step forward and arrange among themselves an international understanding. The money centres once working in union, the governments will follow, then the people.’

    ‘Was it not the ‘capitalists’ of our country which instigated the insurrection in Cuba?’

    ‘We will see a United States of Europe, united by finance, and many political questions which today appear without possible solution (because we insist on arguing on abstract ideas – patriotism, republicanism, ‘jingoism’) will be straightened out by financial necessities, as surely as the mountain snow melted by the sun runs by nature’s laws in the streams and rivers to the sea.’

    ‘This new ‘union of states’ will have all the attributes of our own. Where there is an even greater mixing of peoples, Asia and Europe having each contributed it’s contingent, they will develop the same financial ferocity, and their politics will be a politics of money. Battles will be fought out at the stock exchange.’

    ‘When Cleveland’s warlike message made American securities drop on the London markets, how we all became suddenly pacific as by enchantment.’

    ‘The social formula of the future will be bitter protection of money interests and local patriotism replaced by a ferocious individualism.’
     

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard

  968. A123 says: • Website
    @Ivashka the fool
    @silviosilver

    I don't understand why you're angry with what I posted. I am simply describing what is the situation nowadays. If we should be angry with anyone, it would be with those who enabled the eroding of the European peoples and the atomization of their societies. Those are the culprits. Not me.

    And yes, I would wish to live in a World where anyone would stay more or less where one was born, me included. But we're way post that point nowadays. The effects of Globalization are probably irreversible.

    France is not and never be again the place I discovered decades ago. I saw it change and it was not a pleasant sight. I think it will go further and will be way more damaging still. But we have to remember that these kids' violence is a consequence. The cause is something else entirely.

    Replies: @A123, @silviosilver

    I would wish to live in a World where anyone would stay more or less where one was born, me included. But we’re way post that point nowadays. The effects of Globalization are probably irreversible.

    Step #1 in changing “probably irreversible” to “successfully reversed” is trying.

    I understand there are a number of Wagner mercs available for hire. How well would fireworks wielding Allah Ahkbar death screamers do against Wagner APC’s? Bring in a force known to be combat effective and deploy them against the enemies of France.

    The problem is likely solvable. Currently missing — The will to use force en masse to relentlessly enforce involuntary de-Islamification.

    #LetsGoBrandon 😇

  969. @Anatoly Karlin
    @Mr. Hack

    Thanks. Yes, and the offer still stands. I'm uninterested in decamping back to the US - it has some attractions as the Western imperial center, but price-to-quality ratio is horrendous for anyone who doesn't need to physically be there. I still like Russia from a purely price-to-benefits/culture perspective, with Moscow being my favorite city, so it will almost certainly remain my main "base" into the indefinite future. However, as I am again a derooted thing, digital nomadism makes a lot more sense for me.

    I no longer support triunism or any national mythologies or indeed nation-state. "Patriot" is close to "patsy" in the dictionary for a reason. EHC trends towards globalism and the collapse of borders.

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Beckow, @QCIC, @Mr. Hack, @Mr. XYZ, @PetrOldSack

    There are multiple influencers talking about Million Dollar Bitcoin this year.

    https://roundingtheearth.substack.com/p/election-2024-the-bitcoin-presidential

  970. @Anatoly Karlin
    @Mr. Hack

    Thanks. Yes, and the offer still stands. I'm uninterested in decamping back to the US - it has some attractions as the Western imperial center, but price-to-quality ratio is horrendous for anyone who doesn't need to physically be there. I still like Russia from a purely price-to-benefits/culture perspective, with Moscow being my favorite city, so it will almost certainly remain my main "base" into the indefinite future. However, as I am again a derooted thing, digital nomadism makes a lot more sense for me.

    I no longer support triunism or any national mythologies or indeed nation-state. "Patriot" is close to "patsy" in the dictionary for a reason. EHC trends towards globalism and the collapse of borders.

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Beckow, @QCIC, @Mr. Hack, @Mr. XYZ, @PetrOldSack

    …the US price-to-quality ratio is horrendous for anyone who doesn’t need to physically be there.

    Sure, you like to do the globalist geographic arbitrage as many do. But that comes with a cost: your latter-day embrace of globalism translates into an acceptance of the current Western imperium – and they won’t stop at the current borders. Whether you believe in triunism or not, they will come knocking – you are embracing the full package.

    It is unlikely that the globalist Western march will prevail in its endless battles – they have been losing a lot lately. The center is not of the same quality as it was at its peak. Any isolated individual disconnected from family-tribe-nation – you call it “the myths” – will gravitate towards the Western imperium. It is a natural home if you dont belong anywhere and dont have a stake in the future (e.g. no kids).

    That’s why the West aggressively promotes the lifestyle of the disconnected global gender-confused nomads – but in the process it has fatally undermined itself. It is usually a good idea to sell a horse before it dies…

    • Agree: Ivashka the fool
  971. @Mr. XYZ
    @Anatoly Karlin

    Also, you have previously said that Russia cannot be truly sovereign with only 150 million people, right? Then how exactly are network states supposed to be truly sovereign with population sizes that are astronomically smaller than Russia's?

    You really think that a 1 million or 5 million or 10 million person-strong network state is actually capable of being truly sovereign? If so, how come it can be and a Russia with a whopping 150 million people cannot be?

    (I have previously mentioned how, outside of nation-states, only religious organizations (churches, et cetera) and political parties are able to amass membership sizes that are able to compete with those of nation-states, at least so far. And a network state run by either religious people or members of a single political party might not always have the best outcome, if one goes by the past experience of nation-states with such a character.)

    Replies: @Anatoly Karlin

    You should probably just gather any questions you have about network states for the next OT as this one is nearing its end.

    Also, you have previously said that Russia cannot be truly sovereign with only 150 million people, right? Then how exactly are network states supposed to be truly sovereign with population sizes that are astronomically smaller than Russia’s?

    Network states concentrate human and financial capital. Average IQ of the Zuzalu attendee might be that of an Ivy League university. So Hive Mind dynamics apply.

    In a world in which the relative power of network states gains and flips that of centralized states, even small network states can be very influential. Membership need not be and in fact cannot be exclusive. To a large extent, some fringe exceptions aside (double/triple citizenships), this doesn’t apply to centralized states which impudently claim a monopoly on their denizens’ national loyalties. (It’s quite ridiculous if one thinks about, states claim something like 40% of GDP as taxes globally, but largely refuse to allow competition for more effective solutions in this sector).

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @Anatoly Karlin


    You should probably just gather any questions you have about network states for the next OT as this one is nearing its end.

     

    You can respond to me in the next thread, then! :)

    Network states concentrate human and financial capital. Average IQ of the Zuzalu attendee might be that of an Ivy League university. So Hive Mind dynamics apply.

    In a world in which the relative power of network states gains and flips that of centralized states, even small network states can be very influential. Membership need not be and in fact cannot be exclusive. To a large extent, some fringe exceptions aside (double/triple citizenships), this doesn’t apply to centralized states which impudently claim a monopoly on their denizens’ national loyalties. (It’s quite ridiculous if one thinks about, states claim something like 40% of GDP as taxes globally, but largely refuse to allow competition for more effective solutions in this sector).
     
    Point taken, but even so, even a country like Russia likely has around one million 130+ IQ people. Can any network state actually accumulate such a massive concentration of elite human capital? And of course if we're talking about the US, EU, or China, then we're talking about several million 130+ IQ people for each of them.

    If Mensa International created a network state, it could be quite formidable, no doubt, but even it has only 145,000 members:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mensa_International

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    , @Mr. XYZ
    @Anatoly Karlin

    BTW, wouldn't the rise of extraordinarily smart AI make even EHC redundant for economic productivity? After all, wouldn't extraordinarily smart AI be able to do at least most of the things that EHC is capable of doing?

    If you're arguing that extraordinarily smart AI makes natalism irrelevant, even for EHC*, why does it not also make EHC itself irrelevant? If having EHC reproduce no longer matters, why exactly does having EHC continue existing matter when extraordinarily smart AI can simply and easily replace them?

    *You won't be getting more EHC if EHC will refuse to breed since children are, to a large extent, similar to their parents, even after taking regression towards the mean into account.

  972. A123 says: • Website

    Marvel Star Anthony Mackie BLASTED After Saying Harry Potter And Lord Of The Rings Are TOO WHITE

    Social media has killed the Hollywood star. Why would anyone be this stupid in public? Disney is catering, Phoebe Waller-Bridge and the Dial of Feminism will lose hundreds of millions of dollars, and this guy makes it worse.

    Here is the latest joke.

    — Have you heard about the tuk tuk chase in Indy 5?
    — They jump forward in time and race through a Target swimsuit department.

    PEACE 😇

  973. QCIC says:
    @Anatoly Karlin
    @Mr. Hack

    Thanks. Yes, and the offer still stands. I'm uninterested in decamping back to the US - it has some attractions as the Western imperial center, but price-to-quality ratio is horrendous for anyone who doesn't need to physically be there. I still like Russia from a purely price-to-benefits/culture perspective, with Moscow being my favorite city, so it will almost certainly remain my main "base" into the indefinite future. However, as I am again a derooted thing, digital nomadism makes a lot more sense for me.

    I no longer support triunism or any national mythologies or indeed nation-state. "Patriot" is close to "patsy" in the dictionary for a reason. EHC trends towards globalism and the collapse of borders.

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Beckow, @QCIC, @Mr. Hack, @Mr. XYZ, @PetrOldSack

    Your version of “globalism” seems to be much different than the globalism many people worry about. Are they the same or do you need a different term or concept for your vision?

    If the same, what makes you think this decentralized and possibly anarchic system will be able to pressure those at the top to respect the wishes of even the EHC? The globalist whip holder is probably not EHC in the sense of having any creative potential.

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @QCIC

    ⁸Any phenomenon is dialectic, Globalization is no different. To build something entirely new, you first need to erase what stood in its place.

    Some people emphasize the creative aspects of the Globalization, some the destructive ones, but it is the same process that effects both the destruction if the old and the creation of the new societal patterns.

    One thing is certain though, the old Right has no solution to the problems caused by the Globalization. And neither does old Left. Something different is needed.

    Replies: @A123

  974. @QCIC
    @Anatoly Karlin

    Your version of "globalism" seems to be much different than the globalism many people worry about. Are they the same or do you need a different term or concept for your vision?

    If the same, what makes you think this decentralized and possibly anarchic system will be able to pressure those at the top to respect the wishes of even the EHC? The globalist whip holder is probably not EHC in the sense of having any creative potential.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

    ⁸Any phenomenon is dialectic, Globalization is no different. To build something entirely new, you first need to erase what stood in its place.

    Some people emphasize the creative aspects of the Globalization, some the destructive ones, but it is the same process that effects both the destruction if the old and the creation of the new societal patterns.

    One thing is certain though, the old Right has no solution to the problems caused by the Globalization. And neither does old Left. Something different is needed.

    • Replies: @A123
    @Ivashka the fool


    One thing is certain though, the old Right has no solution to the problems caused by the Globalization. And neither does old Left. Something different is needed.
     
    The new & different thing is mating the best parts of the left & right. Globalism maintained dominance by separating Judeo-Christian values (right) from labour/workers (left). The solution is Christian Populism, which joins these core values.

    You can see it in places like Hungary. In the U.S. it is know as MAGA. Other movements include Vox (Spain) and Fratelli d'Italia.

    PEACE 😇
  975. @Ivashka the fool
    @AP

    Les pieds noirs didn't recognize themselves as Algerian or African. In fact, to be more precise, they had just started to culturally evolve in that direction, something that Afrikaners have also done in South Africa. If they would have stayed a few generations more and would have found a level of common understanding with the Muslim majority, the situation would have been different. L'étranger by Camus described this society well. He was un pied noir after all.

    The conflict in Algeria was due to French citizens of Christian and Jewish descent having different and higher level of citizenship rights than les Français musulmans, which was the way the Algerian-born Maghrebi Muslims were known in the French Republic before the Algerian independence.

    The kids in the banlieues don't object to being French citizens and to having exactly the same citizenship rights guaranteed to them. They're born there and have no other country. It's their homeland, they're alien to the Maghreb and Mali/Nigeri/Whatever.

    The real problem is that they are rootless products of Globalization, Deleuze and Guattari were right about the déterritorialisation & reterritorialisation. These jeunes are now a new social reality. The aging, hedonist and atomized Europe will not get rid of that. It is here to stay.

    Same for Blacks and colored people in North America. In fact the situation there is only somewhat better due to a less rigid and more immigration-centered framework.

    Old Europe is doomed. It's going the way of the dodo bird. And it is not the working class Muslim kids who enabled its demise, but the likes of Von Coudenhove-Kalergi and his Habsburg allies. A pure product of the Austro-Hungarian multicultural milieu that you admire so much.

    https://youtu.be/De40t7ajAAc

    За что боролись, на то и напоролись.

    Ditto for the future of the Noviop RusFed.

    Replies: @Beckow, @AP, @S

    Old Europe is doomed.

    It will take a long time and there are different scenarios. The globalist optimists who run EU want gradual mixing and an emergence of a new deracinated and simplified population: people who are from nowhere, have no sense of solidarity with each others, no firm identity, maybe even fluid gender. The current gender mania is less about the gender itself – that is folklore to distract – and more about erasing any remaining firm boundaries between people, anyone can be anyone: we are all “investors” or “enterpreneurs’, ‘partners” etc…it makes control easier.

    You have to remember how much the 20th century frightened the elite – they don’t want anything like that to ever come back. Can you blame them? They want us to obey.

    More likely scenario is that it won’t work – too many loose ends and moving parts. It is likely to gradually collapse into a more chaotic society. Growing chaos means more extreme attempts to force it on people (like right now) or to reverse it. Given the demographic realities it will not work – we will just get more chaos. Maybe a comfortable chaos, but chaos means that there is no coherent future, it is all day-to-day and random.

    I am kind of enjoying it, but in the provinces and we are mostly left alone.

  976. A123 says: • Website
    @Ivashka the fool
    @QCIC

    ⁸Any phenomenon is dialectic, Globalization is no different. To build something entirely new, you first need to erase what stood in its place.

    Some people emphasize the creative aspects of the Globalization, some the destructive ones, but it is the same process that effects both the destruction if the old and the creation of the new societal patterns.

    One thing is certain though, the old Right has no solution to the problems caused by the Globalization. And neither does old Left. Something different is needed.

    Replies: @A123

    One thing is certain though, the old Right has no solution to the problems caused by the Globalization. And neither does old Left. Something different is needed.

    The new & different thing is mating the best parts of the left & right. Globalism maintained dominance by separating Judeo-Christian values (right) from labour/workers (left). The solution is Christian Populism, which joins these core values.

    You can see it in places like Hungary. In the U.S. it is know as MAGA. Other movements include Vox (Spain) and Fratelli d’Italia.

    PEACE 😇

  977. @songbird
    @Mr. Hack

    Pretty.

    Would suppose it must be close to 10% of the natives in Ireland. Recessive carriers must be higher, and account for the very pale skin you often see even among the dark-haired. The Western shore is a very cloudy place.

    I knew a lot of redheads in school with Irish blood.

    You would think "Red" wouldn't be a very good nickname in Ireland, but there were many men mentioned in the annals with it, like Owen Roe O'Neill.

    Have always felt an affinity for the reds (phenotypic) of Eastern Europe.

    IIRC, sudden death said the Udmurts would attack me, and not make me their king and not select their most attractive sisters for my harem. Of course, he is full of it.

    Replies: @sudden death

    IIRC, sudden death said the Udmurts would attack me, and not make me their king and not select their most attractive sisters for my harem. Of course, he is full of it.

    No, it wasn’t me, never did slander the poor vanishing Udmurts;)

    • LOL: songbird
  978. @Anatoly Karlin
    @Mr. Hack

    Thanks. Yes, and the offer still stands. I'm uninterested in decamping back to the US - it has some attractions as the Western imperial center, but price-to-quality ratio is horrendous for anyone who doesn't need to physically be there. I still like Russia from a purely price-to-benefits/culture perspective, with Moscow being my favorite city, so it will almost certainly remain my main "base" into the indefinite future. However, as I am again a derooted thing, digital nomadism makes a lot more sense for me.

    I no longer support triunism or any national mythologies or indeed nation-state. "Patriot" is close to "patsy" in the dictionary for a reason. EHC trends towards globalism and the collapse of borders.

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Beckow, @QCIC, @Mr. Hack, @Mr. XYZ, @PetrOldSack

    It’s good to see you back here, although some of these new revelations of yours have certainly caught many of your old readers by surprise. AP recently paid you a glowing tribute, mentioning the high caliber of thought that emanated at this blogsite due to your impresario type skills. Your new thoughts are worth exploring.

  979. @Mikhail
    @AP

    Much closer to him on foreign policy IQ than you are for sure.

    Replies: @AP

    You are, instead, close to Ritter.

    • Replies: @Mikhail
    @AP

    You're indeed closer to Bandera.

    , @QCIC
    @AP

    Ritter explains underappreciated aspects of the Cold War and nuclear doctrine related to the Ukraine-Russia-Western conflict.

    AP, I think you would value the depth and clarity this information brings to discussions of Ukraine's plight, even if you find it distasteful.

    Replies: @AP

  980. @Wokechoke
    @Mr. Hack

    Senoritas? Are you Fred Reed's sockpuppet?

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @QCIC

    Who needs Fred Reed?

    • Replies: @QCIC
    @Mr. Hack

    Mr. Hack is redeeming himself.

    Next will we be favored with a Mestizo Ukrainian-Indio woman or is this girl from that group already?

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

  981. AP says:
    @Ivashka the fool
    @AP

    Les pieds noirs didn't recognize themselves as Algerian or African. In fact, to be more precise, they had just started to culturally evolve in that direction, something that Afrikaners have also done in South Africa. If they would have stayed a few generations more and would have found a level of common understanding with the Muslim majority, the situation would have been different. L'étranger by Camus described this society well. He was un pied noir after all.

    The conflict in Algeria was due to French citizens of Christian and Jewish descent having different and higher level of citizenship rights than les Français musulmans, which was the way the Algerian-born Maghrebi Muslims were known in the French Republic before the Algerian independence.

    The kids in the banlieues don't object to being French citizens and to having exactly the same citizenship rights guaranteed to them. They're born there and have no other country. It's their homeland, they're alien to the Maghreb and Mali/Nigeri/Whatever.

    The real problem is that they are rootless products of Globalization, Deleuze and Guattari were right about the déterritorialisation & reterritorialisation. These jeunes are now a new social reality. The aging, hedonist and atomized Europe will not get rid of that. It is here to stay.

    Same for Blacks and colored people in North America. In fact the situation there is only somewhat better due to a less rigid and more immigration-centered framework.

    Old Europe is doomed. It's going the way of the dodo bird. And it is not the working class Muslim kids who enabled its demise, but the likes of Von Coudenhove-Kalergi and his Habsburg allies. A pure product of the Austro-Hungarian multicultural milieu that you admire so much.

    https://youtu.be/De40t7ajAAc

    За что боролись, на то и напоролись.

    Ditto for the future of the Noviop RusFed.

    Replies: @Beckow, @AP, @S

    Les pieds noirs didn’t recognize themselves as Algerian or African. In fact, to be more precise, they had just started to culturally evolve in that direction, something that Afrikaners have also done in South Africa.

    The humane solution would have been to give them their own homeland in Oran. Compensation for centuries of slave raiding.

    Perhaps these deracinated looters and rioters can be provided with a homeland of some sort, also, away from French cities. Maybe in Algeria, send them there with all their assets, they must have something.

    Old Europe is doomed. It’s going the way of the dodo bird

    The pessimism of someone without Faith. Who knows? This might inspire an awakening.

    And it is not the working class Muslim kids who enabled its demise, but the likes of Von Coudenhove-Kalergi and his Habsburg allies. A pure product of the Austro-Hungarian multicultural milieu that you admire so much.

    Austria-Hungary was a traditionalist state. It’s diversity was pre-nationalist, not post-nationalist. That is a huge difference. Had the correct side won World War I, we would not have such a mess.

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @AP


    The humane solution would have been to give them their own homeland in Oran.
     
    Well, yes there were talks of l'Oranie being excluded from the independence deal. But one should remember that De Gaule wanted to disentangle France from the Maghreb entirely. He did that because being the very intelligent man that he was, he understood that keeping ten million Algerians as French citizens would be impossible for the French state. Remember that they were citizens at the time, Algeria was not a colony, but un département de la République. Today Algerians number around 40 million people, of which some 5 millions live in France. Imagine if France had to manage 40 millions of Algerians. Algerians would probably reach population parity with France in this generation or the next. De Gaule was right, a separation was absolutely required.

    Unfortunately, a complete severing of the ties proved impossible, not in the least because De Gaule has been chased from power 6 years after the Algerian independence by the Globalist chienlit (to use De Gaule's expression about the May 1968 protests). Those who came after De Gaule, had the Globalist financial circles interests close to their heart and started a mass migration process.

    Where De Gaule wanted an independent, strong and stable France, those who came after him, both left and right, were more or less Globalist and Atlanticist. Of which Macron (a former Rothschild employee) is a typical example.


    Maybe in Algeria, send them there with all their assets, they must have something.
     
    Algerians back home despise these types. And they are not just Algerians, there are many sub-Saharan Africans and other Maghrebis. These poor souls are really stuck in the middle. They've become the "classless elements", the lumpen proletaria. Hence their violence.

    The pessimism of someone without Faith. Who knows? This might inspire an awakening.

     

    The only true Awakening is Awakening of faith in Mahayana.

    🙂

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Awakening_of_Faith_in_the_Mahayana


    Austria-Hungary was a traditionalist state. It’s diversity was pre-nationalist, not post-nationalist.
     
    That might explain why Kalergi and Otto Von Habsburg worked to undermine European nation states. After all, an aristocracy is always somewhat cosmopolitan. The social function is more important than the ethnicity of the aristocrat. And the aristocracy primary competitors always were the middle class bourgeois which are the carriers of the national spirit. No wonder that after the fall of the Empire, these Austro-Hungarian aristocrats did all they could to weaken the European nations' middle class, including by promoting the Jewish preeminence, immigration and misgenation.

    Had the correct side won World War I, we would not have such a mess.

     

    There shouldn't have been a WWI, it was a catastrophe that started the Europe's unraveling, to much Anglo-American and Jewish applause...

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Mr. XYZ, @AP

    , @Mr. XYZ
    @AP


    The humane solution would have been to give them their own homeland in Oran. Compensation for centuries of slave raiding.
     
    Algeria would still be pissed off and many pieds-noirs would still be dislocated since many, if not most, of them did not live in the Oran area.

    Oran is the most logical place for France to keep if it insists on keeping any part of Algeria in 1962. It was European for around 400 of the last 500 years. But again, it would strain relations with Algeria for a relatively small gain.

    Perhaps these deracinated looters and rioters can be provided with a homeland of some sort, also, away from French cities. Maybe in Algeria, send them there with all their assets, they must have something.
     
    I'm unsure if President Tebboune would actually be willing to welcome them with open arms. Why would he need more potential troublemakers after dealing with the hirak movement just a couple of years ago?

    Austria-Hungary was a traditionalist state. It’s diversity was pre-nationalist, not post-nationalist. That is a huge difference. Had the correct side won World War I, we would not have such a mess.

     

    I'm unsure that a wave of liberalism would not have eventually swept the Central Powers countries had they won World War I. They would not have been immune to social trends, you know?

    In such a scenario, you could potentially eventually see large-scale Muslim immigration into the Central Powers countries, unless of course the Ottoman Empire itself is so attractive that Muslims prefer going there instead of going to Germany and Austria-Hungary (and Poland). (In real life, Communism kept most of the Hapsburg realm as well as the former PLC almost ethnically pure, which won't be the case in a no-Communism TL.)

    In any case, the Central Powers can primarily blame themselves for losing WWI by invading Belgium (thus bringing Britain into WWI), launching the Zimmerman Telegram, and launching USW (thus bringing the US into WWI). Had the CPs had the benefit of hindsight, they would not have done at least the last two things here, if not all three of these things.
  982. QCIC says:
    @Wokechoke
    @Mr. Hack

    Senoritas? Are you Fred Reed's sockpuppet?

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @QCIC

    Huge insult to Fred Reed.

    If Hack were a Reed sock puppet the rants would have insightful and humorous content as opposed to the incessant “Slava Ukraine” droning. On the other hand, the name does sound like something Reed might select.

    Has Fred weighed in on the Ukraine mess recently?

  983. @Mr. Hack
    @Wokechoke

    Who needs Fred Reed?

    https://mail-order-bride.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/37-1618922883217.jpg

    Replies: @QCIC

    Mr. Hack is redeeming himself.

    Next will we be favored with a Mestizo Ukrainian-Indio woman or is this girl from that group already?

    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @QCIC

    I've already favored you with a photo of a beautiful Ukrainian woman within comment #890. You're on your own now. :-)

    Replies: @QCIC

  984. @AP
    @Mikhail

    You are, instead, close to Ritter.

    Replies: @Mikhail, @QCIC

    You’re indeed closer to Bandera.

  985. @AP
    @Mikhail

    You are, instead, close to Ritter.

    Replies: @Mikhail, @QCIC

    Ritter explains underappreciated aspects of the Cold War and nuclear doctrine related to the Ukraine-Russia-Western conflict.

    AP, I think you would value the depth and clarity this information brings to discussions of Ukraine’s plight, even if you find it distasteful.

    • Replies: @AP
    @QCIC

    The problem with Ritter is not that he is distasteful, but that he is a fool. Or rather, writes like one. His grift may make him money from fools who value his "insights."

    Replies: @QCIC

  986. @QCIC
    @Mr. Hack

    Mr. Hack is redeeming himself.

    Next will we be favored with a Mestizo Ukrainian-Indio woman or is this girl from that group already?

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

    I’ve already favored you with a photo of a beautiful Ukrainian woman within comment #890. You’re on your own now. 🙂

    • Replies: @QCIC
    @Mr. Hack

    I did see the fine redhead Alina @ #890. I had hoped the second woman was a sign of a new trend to replace your mildly entertaining (at best) Zelensky cartoons. Too bad.

    I have wondered if there are a bunch of people with Slavic-Hispanic ancestry in places like Cuba. Maybe these folks have what it takes to save the world.

  987. @AP
    @Gerard1234


    LMAO. As is expected, this fantasis
     
    You were caught posting from some post-industrial shithole in northern England. The worst place to live in England. What a loser. I guess a Sovok untermensch "civil engineer" is good for cleaning an abandoned factory.

    How is life among the Pakistani gangs? Do they appreciate your gender fluidity (you have admitted it)?

    It's funny how much you wrote, when you were shown to be an ignorant moron as usual.

    Since you insist, we will continue the lesson.

    In North America, place names come from the first settlers. Ukrainians came to North America in the late 19th century. By that time, most places were already long-settled. In the USA, most Ukrainians came to New York, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Ohio, Chicago, Michigan. These places had been settled and named for hundreds of years. So there are probably no Ukrainian place names in the USA.

    But in the Canadian prairies, Ukrainians were often the first settlers. So that is where the Ukrainian place names are.

    For example, Ukraina, Manitoba:

    https://roadsidethoughts.com/mb/ukraina-profile.htm

    You claim people who didn't think they were Ukrainian would name a place Ukraina?

    A Canadian government source with some more Ukrainian place names:

    https://www.communitystories.ca/v1/pm_v2.php?id=story_line&lg=English&fl=0&ex=00000464&sl=5522&pos=1

    A resident of Ukraina in Manitoba (near Dauphin) tells how, in 1897, a group of Ukrainian immigrants settled on virgin territory some 200 miles from Winnipeg. Once established, the immigrants met to agree on the geographic name to be given the settlement. A proposal that the new settlement bear the name "Ukraina" out of respect for their native land won general agreement. The next step was a letter to Ottawa with a request that the name be officially registered. A request that the near-by railway station be called Dnipro was also forwarded at the same time. The government agreed to the request for Ukraina but rejected the other request with the explanation that there was already a community named Dnipro in Saskatchewan. That is how the first place name ''Ukraina" appeared in Canada. Altogether there are three - one in each of the western provinces. Place names borrowed from the homeland also crop up in names like Halicz, Zbaraz. Komarno, Seech, Dnieper, Poltava, Ternopol, Luzan, Sniatyn, Sokal, Kiev, Boian, Jaroslaw, Stry, Shepenge, Dniester, Zbruch, Prut, Karpati, and others.

    :::::::::::::::::

    If you knew something about Slavic languages, you would know that Ukrainian uses the Cyrillic alphabet. This alphabet is different from the Latin one. Did you know, idiot-Gerard, that Polish is a Slavic languages and that it uses the Latin alphabet?

    When Ukrainians came to North America they often uses Latin letters as Poles do. So "v" becomes "w," "ch" becomes "cz." This occurred with surnames and some place names.

    Here is from the Canadian Encyclopedia:

    https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/timeline/ukrainian-canadian-history

    "In 1892, a small group of immigrants organized by Ivan Pylypow"

    Note the "w."

    That is why there is a town in Canada called "Slawa."

    It has a Ukrainian Orthodox cemetery:

    https://www.findagrave.com/cemetery/2578461/saint-mary's-ukrainian-orthodox-cemetery

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Mr. Hack, @Dmitry, @Gerard1234

    You were caught posting from some post-industrial shithole in northern England. The worst place to live in England. What a loser. I guess a Sovok untermensch “civil engineer” is good for cleaning an abandoned factory.

    LMAO. An amusing lie. Just sums up the tactics a compulsive liar sociopathic fuckwit as yourself will amusingly do…..from the gutter.

    Do they appreciate your gender fluidity (you have admitted it)?

    Bizarre, idiotic and of course another LIE. Mr Hack , different to you, is at least “Ukrainian” diaspora. Fantasizing about having Mr Hack’s life is almost as pathetic as plagiarising his own stupid jokes on here. LOL

    How is life among the Pakistani gangs?

    Again, truly bizarre. Highly indicative of the fact you aren’t ukrainian or have any connection to the people there, because any ACTUAL diaspora would be concerned that Pakistani gangs would have been fully involved with Ukrainain women in the last year……except probably its more the “cultured” Albanian and Polish gangs throughout Europe who are, en masse, using Ukrainian whores to service them in the brothel/human traffiking markets.

    What Pakistani gangs are in Kazan you mentally sick retard!!???

    Anyway, – Pakistani gangs as far as I know, would be UK based, and though they are also blatantly using ukrainian whores, en masse, to service them in the brothel/human traffiking markets, the UK is not the main areas for this. But Britain , despite having a huge role in creating , demographically catastrophic numbers of ukronazis dying…..is only having a relatively small amount of ukrop refugees in comparison to everyone else. From what I hear, over 50% of them are there only because they have family already in UK ( Banderetard excrement smuggled out by MI6 and post-soviet diaspora), so the Pakistani gangs are not as prolific with Galician whores as the Albanian and Polish gangs in continental Europe. This is the life their western backers have lead them too. Anyway at least they are providing entertainment to my great friend Mikel, with the beastiality and sick-stuff with dwarves that Galician whores are filming

    Also the place name goes on fonetics regrading the latin translations you retard

    • Replies: @YetAnotherAnon
    @Gerard1234

    "From what I hear, over 50% of them are there only because they have family already in UK ( Banderetard excrement smuggled out by MI6 and post-soviet diaspora)"

    I know a Ukrainian family who got out from Kharkov - they are Russian-speakers and by no means Bandera fans, pretty depressed about the whole thing simply because of the slaughter,because friends and family are being sent to be killed, and because the front line is likely at some stage to pass through their city. There are a fair number here altogether - maybe 100,000 - admittedly nothing compared with numbers in Russia or Poland.

    On a visit to the North of England I saw hotels which had been paid by HMG to house them.

    After WW2 MI6 may have helped get Banderites out - there were biggish Ukrainian areas in a few Northern cities. Bradford had Ukrainian, Lithuanian and Latvian social clubs.

    And for years I worked alongside a guy with (as I thought) a Polish name. Nice guy, born after WW2.

    "It's not Polish, it's Ukrainian!"

    "How did your father come to be here then, I thought all Soviet prisoners were returned?"

    "Ah, but you see, he was fighting on the German side!"

    , @AP
    @Gerard1234


    You were caught posting from some post-industrial shithole in northern England. The worst place to live in England. What a loser. I guess a Sovok untermensch “civil engineer” is good for cleaning an abandoned factory.

    LMAO. An amusing lie.
     
    No, you were caught:

    https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-158/#comment-4794762

    "reminding people that you consistently post from somewhere in NW England (a region of 7 million people, so hardly a dox), in the context of your claimed authority as a denizen of Kazan"

    Your references to English football give you away.

    You moved to the crappiest part of England with your pseudo-degree, to live amongst the Pakistani grooming gangs. You are an untermensch, what better to expect?

    Do you work construction? General labor might be all your education is worth. Do you clean toilets? Drive an uber? You mention whores a lot. Maybe that's your thing?

    You used to pretend you were a woman:

    https://www.unz.com/comments/all/?commenterfilter=Ms+Karlin-Gerard

    Pakistani gangs as far as I know, would be UK based
     
    Of course you would know. It's your social circles.

    more the “cultured” Albanian and Polish gangs throughout Europe who are, en masse, using Ukrainian whores
     
    But at least with your words above, you confirm that Donbas is Ukraine.

    This is your world, low class gangs and whores. It's all you can write about with supposed authority. Your people.

    Maybe you have forgotten Russian because you have lived there too long?

    You didn't even know the Russian word for "watch":

    https://www.unz.com/akarlin/god-truly-does-have-a-sense-of-humor/#comment-3472709
  988. LatW says:
    @Ivashka the fool
    @Another Polish Perspective

    ⁷Putin supposedly comes from a very modest background in the Ligovo neighborhood in Piter. That might explain his will to get wealthy and influential by any means and his nouveau riche hedonism.

    However, we know that his Tver Karelian grandfather worked as a cook for Lenin in Gorky. This is interesting, because at the time, the ethnic Russian personnel for the Bolshevik elite were supposedly selected from the most radical Old Believer fraction of Netovshhina that have completely rejected the clergy and all the rites. The Netovshhina types were convinced that the Tsarist government was the Antichrist government. These radical sectarian people were supposedly recruited and managed by Krasin, who was the Bolshevik Old Believer liaison probably responsible for killing Savva Morozov, a death that the French government preferred to rule a suicide.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonid_Krasin

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Savva_Morozov

    BTW, although merchants, the Old Believer Morozov family was related to the family of Boyarinya Morozova, the aristocrat who was martyred for her staunchly Old Believer stance.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feodosia_Morozova

    Therefore, the Morozovs retained their wealth and influence despite all the persecutions, until Savva decided to finance the Reds following his mistress requests.

    https://www.rbth.com/history/336239-how-russian-empires-wealthiest-man-sponsored-bolsheviks

    Another example of typically Russian lack of limits.

    Replies: @Another Polish Perspective, @LatW

    re: Old Believer merchants.

    After you recommended the work of the historian Alexander Pyzhikov, I watched an interesting documentary called “The Russian Schism” (“Русский раскол”). This delves deeper into the role of the Old Believer merchants (купечество). Apparently, the best factories in Moscow at the time were owned by the Old Believers and these factory owners sponsored the Bolsheviks. These are not the type of Old Believers that we’re used to knowing, but those who were more in tune with the economic and political currents of the time.

    The discussion about the “two civilizations” within one Russia is very eye opening, almost shocking. The two eagles on the coat of arms are a reflection of these two internal civilizations. But it explains some of the contradictions that have always puzzled me.

    Interestingly, they mention two different types of capitalisms that developed in Russia, the one based on exporting resources (what they called the St Pete one and the one that is still dominant today, at the time it was grain, not oil) and the other, the internal Moscow kind, manufacturing that served the internal needs and was led in many cases by Old Believers.

    The second episode goes deeper into their particular role (the first part is more of a general prelude to the struggles of the time). The video features the beautiful grave site of Savva Morozov.

    [MORE]

    • Replies: @LatW
    @LatW

    Btw, there is an interesting phenomenon of the Old Believer business culture based on the "община" ("community") principle, which is different from the more individualist types of capitalism (it had to do with the Old Believers not having crediting). It's very democratic and similar to the co-ops in the West. One can even say that it was a kind of a "network state" that operated in the pre-revolutionary Russia, especially Moscow. They rode the wave of the massive urbanization and growth of manufacturing of the time.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

  989. LatW says:
    @LatW
    @Ivashka the fool

    re: Old Believer merchants.

    After you recommended the work of the historian Alexander Pyzhikov, I watched an interesting documentary called "The Russian Schism" ("Русский раскол"). This delves deeper into the role of the Old Believer merchants (купечество). Apparently, the best factories in Moscow at the time were owned by the Old Believers and these factory owners sponsored the Bolsheviks. These are not the type of Old Believers that we're used to knowing, but those who were more in tune with the economic and political currents of the time.

    The discussion about the "two civilizations" within one Russia is very eye opening, almost shocking. The two eagles on the coat of arms are a reflection of these two internal civilizations. But it explains some of the contradictions that have always puzzled me.

    Interestingly, they mention two different types of capitalisms that developed in Russia, the one based on exporting resources (what they called the St Pete one and the one that is still dominant today, at the time it was grain, not oil) and the other, the internal Moscow kind, manufacturing that served the internal needs and was led in many cases by Old Believers.

    The second episode goes deeper into their particular role (the first part is more of a general prelude to the struggles of the time). The video features the beautiful grave site of Savva Morozov.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EOD9Yk3Jll4

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JE-S3kXJUzM&t=462s

    Replies: @LatW

    Btw, there is an interesting phenomenon of the Old Believer business culture based on the “община” (“community”) principle, which is different from the more individualist types of capitalism (it had to do with the Old Believers not having crediting). It’s very democratic and similar to the co-ops in the West. One can even say that it was a kind of a “network state” that operated in the pre-revolutionary Russia, especially Moscow. They rode the wave of the massive urbanization and growth of manufacturing of the time.

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @LatW

    I watched this series of documentaries and I also found them very interesting. I agree with what you wrote about two parallel societies coexisting after Peter the Great reforms. I have often described the Russian Imperial two headed eagle as a split personality bird.

    Yes, the "deep people" were still very much Old Believer by the time of Nicholas the Ist, and the Old Believer
    merchant elites played an important role in the evolution of Russia in the second half of the nineteenth century and the early twentieth century. It is them who have encouraged the development of what we see today as typical Silver Age (Серебрянный Век) Russian art.

    The Tretyakov brothers, Morozov, Mamontov: Moskovite Old Believer business tycoon, patrons of the arts and philanthropists all of them. They were deeply Russian, when compared to cosmopolitan and Western Europe oriented Saint-Petersburg elites. And yes, they had a conflicted relationship with the Tsarist social organization and the Romanov dynasty. That is why they did not hesitate to help the revolutionaries against absolutism.

    Pyzhykov has done a lot for the study of the Old Believer impact on the Russian society. He was an exceptionally gifted historian. His forte was working with the documents in the archives. He always dug as deep as possible in the subject of his studies.

    It is therefore unfortunate that he was not able to complete his work on the remnants of Paganism in Tsarist Russian Empire before his untimely death. In the few interviews he gave on this topic, he shared his amazement at finding that a whole Pagan outlook could still be reconstructed through looking into the nineteenth century ethnology, anthropology and mythology studies of the Russian peasant populations, studies results that he found preserved in the archives.

    He was preparing a publication describing this Pagan outlook, which according to him most probably pervaded entirely the life of the ancient Slavic peoples. He died of a stroke, while working in the archives with the documents, something that he adored doing.

    May he rest in peace.

    Replies: @LatW

  990. S says:
    @Ivashka the fool
    @AP

    Les pieds noirs didn't recognize themselves as Algerian or African. In fact, to be more precise, they had just started to culturally evolve in that direction, something that Afrikaners have also done in South Africa. If they would have stayed a few generations more and would have found a level of common understanding with the Muslim majority, the situation would have been different. L'étranger by Camus described this society well. He was un pied noir after all.

    The conflict in Algeria was due to French citizens of Christian and Jewish descent having different and higher level of citizenship rights than les Français musulmans, which was the way the Algerian-born Maghrebi Muslims were known in the French Republic before the Algerian independence.

    The kids in the banlieues don't object to being French citizens and to having exactly the same citizenship rights guaranteed to them. They're born there and have no other country. It's their homeland, they're alien to the Maghreb and Mali/Nigeri/Whatever.

    The real problem is that they are rootless products of Globalization, Deleuze and Guattari were right about the déterritorialisation & reterritorialisation. These jeunes are now a new social reality. The aging, hedonist and atomized Europe will not get rid of that. It is here to stay.

    Same for Blacks and colored people in North America. In fact the situation there is only somewhat better due to a less rigid and more immigration-centered framework.

    Old Europe is doomed. It's going the way of the dodo bird. And it is not the working class Muslim kids who enabled its demise, but the likes of Von Coudenhove-Kalergi and his Habsburg allies. A pure product of the Austro-Hungarian multicultural milieu that you admire so much.

    https://youtu.be/De40t7ajAAc

    За что боролись, на то и напоролись.

    Ditto for the future of the Noviop RusFed.

    Replies: @Beckow, @AP, @S

    The real problem is that they are rootless products of Globalization, Deleuze and Guattari were right about the déterritorialisation & reterritorialisation. These jeunes are now a new social reality. The aging, hedonist and atomized Europe will not get rid of that. It is here to stay.

    The below excerpt was written and published in the United States in 1898 by Eliot Gregory in regards to the exact nature and character of the future European ‘union of states’ as he saw it.

    He didn’t much like it, to his credit.

    As a grand nephew of James Fenimore Cooper, author of The Last of the Mohicans, and a long time resident of both New York City and Paris, whom directed the Metropolitan Opera Company of New York, Gregory routinely hobnobbed with the rich and powerful members of the US Northeastern establishment. So, I doubt he just concocted this vision entirely off the top of his head, but had probably been more or less told in so many words that this is how things are going to be.

    https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=chi.17436845&view=1up&seq=518

    ‘The social formula of the future will be bitter protection of money interests and local patriotism replaced by a ferocious individualism.’

    The United States of Europe – North American Review (1898)

    ‘..you may be sure that the financiers will step forward and arrange among themselves an international understanding. The money centres once working in union, the governments will follow, then the people.’

    ‘Was it not the ‘capitalists’ of our country which instigated the insurrection in Cuba?’

    ‘We will see a United States of Europe, united by finance, and many political questions which today appear without possible solution (because we insist on arguing on abstract ideas – patriotism, republicanism, ‘jingoism’) will be straightened out by financial necessities, as surely as the mountain snow melted by the sun runs by nature’s laws in the streams and rivers to the sea.’

    ‘This new ‘union of states’ will have all the attributes of our own. Where there is an even greater mixing of peoples, Asia and Europe having each contributed it’s contingent, they will develop the same financial ferocity, and their politics will be a politics of money. Battles will be fought out at the stock exchange.’

    ‘When Cleveland’s warlike message made American securities drop on the London markets, how we all became suddenly pacific as by enchantment.’

    ‘The social formula of the future will be bitter protection of money interests and local patriotism replaced by a ferocious individualism.’

    • Agree: Ivashka the fool
    • Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
    @S

    Fine find!

    It looks really obscure to me. Did you spend of lot of time to dig that out? Did you get lucky? Do you have some wizard who feeds you good clues?

    The thing about information is it costs you absolutely nothing to give it away and enriches anybody else who is in the watershed.

    Replies: @S

  991. @LatW
    @Mr. XYZ


    What exactly makes you think that LatW (who is a woman, BTW) is a neocon?
     
    I actually dislike certain neocons (as well as neo-liberals). But I support the internationally recognized borders of Ukraine. Granted, the Ukrainians themselves should've been more careful about governing these borders in some cases, but I am in no position to lecture them (since their situation is extremely complex).

    I don’t see her ever mentioning that she supported a Western or Russian war with China, for instance.
     
    The West should not put themselves in a situation where they have a confrontation with Russia and a confrontation in the Pacific. That is absolutely unacceptable and should be avoided at all costs. The West should not antagonize China but work to become less dependent on China and less entangled with China (granted, China needs the US more than the US needs China). The West is not doing this, which is harmful and dangerous long term, once again, the burden here is only being passed over to the next generation.

    China should not be antagonized, but China should also not be allowed to have a say over European affairs. They should be engaged in a neutrally amicable, but conservative and cautious way.

    What "Russian war with China" are you talking about? My position here is similar to the Russian ethnonats - do not give in to China, but stay on good terms. Care about your own first.

    As to Svoboda Rossii and RDK, I like these groups not because they are "shaking up Russia" or not even because they are armed and dangerous anti-Putinists who do not just talk, but act (unlike the Russian liberals (((some))) of whose morality I've recently began to question). I like them as people, the Legion because they are honest, egalitarian people, and the RDK because we are ideologically compatible. So I like them for other reasons that neocons might. And, mind you, the neocons do not "like them", they just view them as convenient in shaking up Russia. These guys, if they could, should get rid of both neocons and the Russian Noviops.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @A123, @YetAnotherAnon

    “I support the internationally recognized borders of Ukraine”

    That sounds awfully like the Bishop in Elizabeth I’s time (or was it in Bloody Mary’s?) who swore that he was a dedicated supporter of “the religion set forth by Her Majesty”.

    An unheroic outlook, but then he didn’t fancy being a martyr, and who can blame him?

    “I support whatever it is that powerful people support”.

    • Replies: @LatW
    @YetAnotherAnon


    An unheroic outlook, but then he didn’t fancy being a martyr, and who can blame him?

    “I support whatever it is that powerful people support”.
     

    Wrong. I support Ukraine's borders because I support my own very vital borders. Has exactly zero to do with anything that the media or "powerful people" say. It is existential - your borders get violated, your children get murdered, I don't get how in 2023, people still do not see this.

    Replies: @YetAnotherAnon

  992. @S
    @Ivashka the fool


    The real problem is that they are rootless products of Globalization, Deleuze and Guattari were right about the déterritorialisation & reterritorialisation. These jeunes are now a new social reality. The aging, hedonist and atomized Europe will not get rid of that. It is here to stay.
     
    The below excerpt was written and published in the United States in 1898 by Eliot Gregory in regards to the exact nature and character of the future European 'union of states' as he saw it.

    He didn't much like it, to his credit.

    As a grand nephew of James Fenimore Cooper, author of The Last of the Mohicans, and a long time resident of both New York City and Paris, whom directed the Metropolitan Opera Company of New York, Gregory routinely hobnobbed with the rich and powerful members of the US Northeastern establishment. So, I doubt he just concocted this vision entirely off the top of his head, but had probably been more or less told in so many words that this is how things are going to be.

    https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=chi.17436845&view=1up&seq=518


    ‘The social formula of the future will be bitter protection of money interests and local patriotism replaced by a ferocious individualism.’

    The United States of Europe - North American Review (1898)

    ‘..you may be sure that the financiers will step forward and arrange among themselves an international understanding. The money centres once working in union, the governments will follow, then the people.’

    ‘Was it not the ‘capitalists’ of our country which instigated the insurrection in Cuba?’

    ‘We will see a United States of Europe, united by finance, and many political questions which today appear without possible solution (because we insist on arguing on abstract ideas – patriotism, republicanism, ‘jingoism’) will be straightened out by financial necessities, as surely as the mountain snow melted by the sun runs by nature’s laws in the streams and rivers to the sea.’

    ‘This new ‘union of states’ will have all the attributes of our own. Where there is an even greater mixing of peoples, Asia and Europe having each contributed it’s contingent, they will develop the same financial ferocity, and their politics will be a politics of money. Battles will be fought out at the stock exchange.’

    ‘When Cleveland’s warlike message made American securities drop on the London markets, how we all became suddenly pacific as by enchantment.’

    ‘The social formula of the future will be bitter protection of money interests and local patriotism replaced by a ferocious individualism.’
     

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard

    Fine find!

    It looks really obscure to me. Did you spend of lot of time to dig that out? Did you get lucky? Do you have some wizard who feeds you good clues?

    The thing about information is it costs you absolutely nothing to give it away and enriches anybody else who is in the watershed.

    • Replies: @S
    @Emil Nikola Richard


    Fine find!
     
    Thanks. :-)

    It looks really obscure to me. Did you spend of lot of time to dig that out? Did you get lucky? Do you have some wizard who feeds you good clues?
     
    It is obscure.

    There are two huge free on-line libraries of scanned in American 19th century books, journals, and periodicals run by the U of Michigan and U of Chicago called 'Making of America'.

    I wanted to understand the United States and what it was (and is) about, so I spent many hundreds (if not thousands) of hours reading word by word, page by page, cover to cover, and, issue by issue, very large swathes of those two library's periodicals, journals, and books. I compared notes between those 19th century journals, and journals today, on various subjects, and, irregardless of my own prior opinion(s), 'let the chips fall where they may', to get at the truth of the matter.

    My conclusion was that quite a lot about what they teach regarding the history of the United States today doesn't jive with the original source materials, and there's quite a lot of convenient 'lying by omission'.

    So, yes, quite a lot of time, but not luck (per se), or, wizards.

    I'd compare my experience perusing 19th century literature with what gold miners do when they time consumingly process hundreds and thousands of tons of potentially promising ore, 99 percent plus of it ultimately being dross. It's those occasional nuggets, like the Gregory quote being discussed here, or, that equally obscure 1853 New Rome book, or, Roger Casement's 1915 The Crime Against Europe in regards to WWI, amongst other similar generally unknown items, which have made it all worth it in the end.

    The thing about information is it costs you absolutely nothing to give it away and enriches anybody else who is in the watershed.
     
    Yes, I have posted a great deal in regards to the more purely Anglo-Saxon aspects of the history of the US/UK (and Anglosphere in general) as I don't think this particular subject is as well understood as it ought to be, and anyone who wishes may borrow freely from those posts without attribution if they so desire. I think this is the case because the US/UK and Anglosphere (for the moment) are still ongoing concerns.

    I think once the Fall of Capitalism takes place, ie the impending economic and political collapse of the United States and it's Western bloc, that a great many secrets about the US/UK will then be revealed, albeit perhaps only briefly, just as when the Fall of Communism took place and the secrets of the Soviet Union were briefly revealed.

    It is my hope that perhaps some of these secrets about the US/UK being revealed now before the fact (rather than after) might be of use to those who are of good will.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

  993. Sean says:
    @Ivashka the fool
    @Ivashka the fool

    https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/france-deploys-45000-police-armored-vehicles-amid-riots-2023-07-01/

    45000 armed police, armored vehicles, helicopters.

    What's next, fighter jets ?

    And there is no solution to this problem. Even if the right political parties are in charge. You can't just send expell millions of French citizens and send them to Africa. Besides, France only has a reproduction level demographics because of the people of immigrant descent. It would be aging relatively rapidly without them.

    The only solution is education, which was a strong side of the French society for hundreds of years. But education is broken nowadays. In these communities l, it is no longer able to form a valuable representation of an educated and well integrated citizen. These kids see teachers as mediocre people that need not be respected and their society as a hedonistic, nihilistic, hypocrite place, where only money and wealth are important.

    They cannot possibly respect such a place.

    Replies: @A123, @silviosilver, @Sean

    It would be aging relatively rapidly without them

    What are the advantages of a growing population of ever younger people for a country such as France that is not planning on fighting an existential war and is post industrial?

    It seems to me the business class reaps the benefits, inasmuch as it stops wages rising in jobs that cannot be offshored (construction service industry occupations), and because the growth is all immigrant descended it inhibits working class cohesion and organisation. Reserve armies of immigrant descended labour are already at a loose end and making their own entertainment; with coming automisation from AI the unemployment among them will only get worse.

    • Agree: YetAnotherAnon
    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @Sean

    I mostly agree. Of course further increase in immigrant population is completely unnecessary. But OTOH, someone has to pay the retirement/pension/ social security that in France are amongst the most generous in the World. Pension funds are probably the most important part of the necessity of having a younger population. Remember that the French have recently vigorously manifested against the rising of the age of retirement. Anyways, manifestations and strikes are very much an integral part of French culture

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

  994. @Gerard1234
    @AP


    You were caught posting from some post-industrial shithole in northern England. The worst place to live in England. What a loser. I guess a Sovok untermensch “civil engineer” is good for cleaning an abandoned factory.
     
    LMAO. An amusing lie. Just sums up the tactics a compulsive liar sociopathic fuckwit as yourself will amusingly do.....from the gutter.


    Do they appreciate your gender fluidity (you have admitted it)?
     
    Bizarre, idiotic and of course another LIE. Mr Hack , different to you, is at least "Ukrainian" diaspora. Fantasizing about having Mr Hack's life is almost as pathetic as plagiarising his own stupid jokes on here. LOL

    How is life among the Pakistani gangs?
     
    Again, truly bizarre. Highly indicative of the fact you aren't ukrainian or have any connection to the people there, because any ACTUAL diaspora would be concerned that Pakistani gangs would have been fully involved with Ukrainain women in the last year......except probably its more the "cultured" Albanian and Polish gangs throughout Europe who are, en masse, using Ukrainian whores to service them in the brothel/human traffiking markets.

    What Pakistani gangs are in Kazan you mentally sick retard!!???

    Anyway, - Pakistani gangs as far as I know, would be UK based, and though they are also blatantly using ukrainian whores, en masse, to service them in the brothel/human traffiking markets, the UK is not the main areas for this. But Britain , despite having a huge role in creating , demographically catastrophic numbers of ukronazis dying.....is only having a relatively small amount of ukrop refugees in comparison to everyone else. From what I hear, over 50% of them are there only because they have family already in UK ( Banderetard excrement smuggled out by MI6 and post-soviet diaspora), so the Pakistani gangs are not as prolific with Galician whores as the Albanian and Polish gangs in continental Europe. This is the life their western backers have lead them too. Anyway at least they are providing entertainment to my great friend Mikel, with the beastiality and sick-stuff with dwarves that Galician whores are filming

    Also the place name goes on fonetics regrading the latin translations you retard

    Replies: @YetAnotherAnon, @AP

    “From what I hear, over 50% of them are there only because they have family already in UK ( Banderetard excrement smuggled out by MI6 and post-soviet diaspora)”

    I know a Ukrainian family who got out from Kharkov – they are Russian-speakers and by no means Bandera fans, pretty depressed about the whole thing simply because of the slaughter,because friends and family are being sent to be killed, and because the front line is likely at some stage to pass through their city. There are a fair number here altogether – maybe 100,000 – admittedly nothing compared with numbers in Russia or Poland.

    On a visit to the North of England I saw hotels which had been paid by HMG to house them.

    After WW2 MI6 may have helped get Banderites out – there were biggish Ukrainian areas in a few Northern cities. Bradford had Ukrainian, Lithuanian and Latvian social clubs.

    And for years I worked alongside a guy with (as I thought) a Polish name. Nice guy, born after WW2.

    “It’s not Polish, it’s Ukrainian!”

    “How did your father come to be here then, I thought all Soviet prisoners were returned?”

    “Ah, but you see, he was fighting on the German side!”

  995. LatW says:
    @YetAnotherAnon
    @LatW

    "I support the internationally recognized borders of Ukraine"

    That sounds awfully like the Bishop in Elizabeth I's time (or was it in Bloody Mary's?) who swore that he was a dedicated supporter of "the religion set forth by Her Majesty".

    An unheroic outlook, but then he didn't fancy being a martyr, and who can blame him?

    "I support whatever it is that powerful people support".

    Replies: @LatW

    An unheroic outlook, but then he didn’t fancy being a martyr, and who can blame him?

    “I support whatever it is that powerful people support”.

    Wrong. I support Ukraine’s borders because I support my own very vital borders. Has exactly zero to do with anything that the media or “powerful people” say. It is existential – your borders get violated, your children get murdered, I don’t get how in 2023, people still do not see this.

    • Replies: @YetAnotherAnon
    @LatW

    The problem was that the people in Donbass and Luhansk (not to mention Crimea) didn't want be be part of Ukraine after the 2014 revolution/coup, inspired by the US.

    NATO themselves had set a precedent when they bombed Serbia* in order to destroy Serbia's very vital borders and let the majority population in Kosovo secede.

    * bombing directly aimed at water, sewage, power supply as well as military targets.

    Did you protest against the attack on Serbia's very vital borders by NATO?

    Replies: @LatW, @Mr. XYZ

  996. LatW says:
    @silviosilver
    @Ivashka the fool


    Even if the right political parties are in charge. You can’t just send expell millions of French citizens and send them to Africa.
     
    Well, let's not be so hasty. With the will and a long-term vision, it may yet prove possible. I mean, if the French could leave Algeria, why can't Algerians leave France? In the shorter term, I'd aim for a "communitarian" solution that recognizes and respects cultural differences - enough silly pretending that all French citizens are French in the same way.

    Besides, France only has a reproduction level demographics because of the people of immigrant descent. It would be aging relatively rapidly without them.
     
    No population can go on expanding forever. If you want to stabilize, then you're going to face the same issue of "aging relatively rapidly" at some future point (albeit perhaps not quite as fast if you're nearer to 2.0 fertility). Now is as good a time as any to face that reality.

    And how the fuck is not obvious that you're better off with an aging populace of your own people - or at least people who don't actively disdain you - than with a young population of culturally and racially hostile arab and afro muzzes?

    (Yes, I am angry with you for posting this utter tommyrot. Angry and astounded. After all, you are the big Mr. Bloodlines around here. Fascinating how quickly that went out the window. )

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @LatW

    Well, let’s not be so hasty. With the will and a long-term vision, it may yet prove possible.

    It is totally possible, but there would need to be a more methodical approach. Early intervention. Maybe loyalty tests. There would have to be political consensus across a wide coalition.

    The biggest issue is probably not even the physical aspect, but the degradation of citizenship. Massive stripping of citizenship degrades the institution of citizenship, same as massive granting of citizenship (and is legally complex, although even that could be worked around). But at some point it might have to be done. Because it is such a huge mental hurdle to overcome, this is where the main bulk of the work could lie.

    As to the physical part (without going into more detail, since that is not safe), a formation of voluntary militias is a good option, as always. Of course, some will have to be sacrificed, but they will become venerated martyrs.

    In the light of this, it looks like in the future there could be a lot of “unneeded” people who wonder around the world without a sense of belonging. Maybe there should be special “network states” for them, hahahaha! 🙂

  997. @Anatoly Karlin
    @Mr. Hack

    Thanks. Yes, and the offer still stands. I'm uninterested in decamping back to the US - it has some attractions as the Western imperial center, but price-to-quality ratio is horrendous for anyone who doesn't need to physically be there. I still like Russia from a purely price-to-benefits/culture perspective, with Moscow being my favorite city, so it will almost certainly remain my main "base" into the indefinite future. However, as I am again a derooted thing, digital nomadism makes a lot more sense for me.

    I no longer support triunism or any national mythologies or indeed nation-state. "Patriot" is close to "patsy" in the dictionary for a reason. EHC trends towards globalism and the collapse of borders.

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Beckow, @QCIC, @Mr. Hack, @Mr. XYZ, @PetrOldSack

    You can respond to me in the next open thread if necessary.

    “Patriot” is close to “patsy” in the dictionary for a reason.

    Shouldn’t EHC like patriotism since it’s essentially a more inclusive (big-tent) nationalism? I seem to recall a lot of Americans being concerned about what Trump and his supporters did on January 6, which does indicate that a love of country still remains among many Americans.

    (BTW, big-tent nationalism has a long history. For instance, some pre-Nazi German nationalists were willing to accept assimilated German Jews into their ranks even though they were not ethnic Germans. Likewise, the founder of the Mladorossi Russian nationalist group was of non-Slavic descent: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Lvovich_Kazembek )

    “Look at how great our countries are! Let’s invite more people into them so that they could also share in our countries’ national glories!” strikes one as a slogan that EHC can get behind, no?

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @Mr. XYZ

    Jamie Raskin, a former law professor and certainly belonging to EHC, played a prominent role in the January 6 inquiry, for instance:

    https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/09/us/jamie-raskin-committee-member-jan-6.html

  998. @QCIC
    @AP

    Ritter explains underappreciated aspects of the Cold War and nuclear doctrine related to the Ukraine-Russia-Western conflict.

    AP, I think you would value the depth and clarity this information brings to discussions of Ukraine's plight, even if you find it distasteful.

    Replies: @AP

    The problem with Ritter is not that he is distasteful, but that he is a fool. Or rather, writes like one. His grift may make him money from fools who value his “insights.”

    • Replies: @QCIC
    @AP

    I agree that predicting the outcome of battles and the short term progress of the fighting is a fool's errand. This does not undermine the significance of Ritter's historical discussions. I don't know if he still covers that material, but it is archived somewhere. Maybe it is in his book.

  999. @Anatoly Karlin
    @AP

    Morawiecki is a thug who has the blood of Polish womyn on his hands.

    EHC rejects clerical fascism.

    Replies: @AP, @Mr. XYZ

    Wouldn’t Polish right-wing clerical fascism still be much better than Russian nationalism in terms of overall death toll, though? Russian nationalism resulted in over 100,000 people killed as a result of Russia’s interventions in Ukraine. Have Polish right-wing clerical fascists even killed several dozen women with their abortion restrictions?

    That’s not to say that Polish right-wing clerical fascism isn’t bad, only that it is significantly less bad than Russian nationalism is.

  1000. @Anatoly Karlin
    @Mr. XYZ

    You should probably just gather any questions you have about network states for the next OT as this one is nearing its end.


    Also, you have previously said that Russia cannot be truly sovereign with only 150 million people, right? Then how exactly are network states supposed to be truly sovereign with population sizes that are astronomically smaller than Russia’s?
     
    Network states concentrate human and financial capital. Average IQ of the Zuzalu attendee might be that of an Ivy League university. So Hive Mind dynamics apply.

    In a world in which the relative power of network states gains and flips that of centralized states, even small network states can be very influential. Membership need not be and in fact cannot be exclusive. To a large extent, some fringe exceptions aside (double/triple citizenships), this doesn't apply to centralized states which impudently claim a monopoly on their denizens' national loyalties. (It's quite ridiculous if one thinks about, states claim something like 40% of GDP as taxes globally, but largely refuse to allow competition for more effective solutions in this sector).

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Mr. XYZ

    You should probably just gather any questions you have about network states for the next OT as this one is nearing its end.

    You can respond to me in the next thread, then! 🙂

    Network states concentrate human and financial capital. Average IQ of the Zuzalu attendee might be that of an Ivy League university. So Hive Mind dynamics apply.

    In a world in which the relative power of network states gains and flips that of centralized states, even small network states can be very influential. Membership need not be and in fact cannot be exclusive. To a large extent, some fringe exceptions aside (double/triple citizenships), this doesn’t apply to centralized states which impudently claim a monopoly on their denizens’ national loyalties. (It’s quite ridiculous if one thinks about, states claim something like 40% of GDP as taxes globally, but largely refuse to allow competition for more effective solutions in this sector).

    Point taken, but even so, even a country like Russia likely has around one million 130+ IQ people. Can any network state actually accumulate such a massive concentration of elite human capital? And of course if we’re talking about the US, EU, or China, then we’re talking about several million 130+ IQ people for each of them.

    If Mensa International created a network state, it could be quite formidable, no doubt, but even it has only 145,000 members:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mensa_International

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @Mr. XYZ

    Even Japan likely has over one million 130+ IQ people, for that matter.

  1001. @LatW
    @YetAnotherAnon


    An unheroic outlook, but then he didn’t fancy being a martyr, and who can blame him?

    “I support whatever it is that powerful people support”.
     

    Wrong. I support Ukraine's borders because I support my own very vital borders. Has exactly zero to do with anything that the media or "powerful people" say. It is existential - your borders get violated, your children get murdered, I don't get how in 2023, people still do not see this.

    Replies: @YetAnotherAnon

    The problem was that the people in Donbass and Luhansk (not to mention Crimea) didn’t want be be part of Ukraine after the 2014 revolution/coup, inspired by the US.

    NATO themselves had set a precedent when they bombed Serbia* in order to destroy Serbia’s very vital borders and let the majority population in Kosovo secede.

    * bombing directly aimed at water, sewage, power supply as well as military targets.

    Did you protest against the attack on Serbia’s very vital borders by NATO?

    • Agree: Ivashka the fool
    • Replies: @LatW
    @YetAnotherAnon


    The problem was that the people in Donbass and Luhansk (not to mention Crimea) didn’t want be be part of Ukraine after the 2014 revolution/coup, inspired by the US.
     
    There was a foreign intervention there. Also, some of the people were saying things like "Путин введи войска!" (Putin, bring in the troops!), openly agitating for an invasion by a hostile (and much larger) state. If this was happening in your own country, would you be ok with that? Of course, not.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @YetAnotherAnon

    , @Mr. XYZ
    @YetAnotherAnon

    The interesting thing is that I myself actually supported Crimean and Donbass separatism between 2014 and 2022. But then when I realized that it simply set the stage for Russia attacking the rest of Ukraine in 2022, I became more hostile towards Crimean and Donbass separatism.

    Similar to how Hitler used his seizure of the Sudetenland in late 1938 as a prelude to his seizure of the rest of Czechia in early 1939, contrary to the principle of national self-determination.

    Replies: @Mikhail, @Wokechoke

  1002. AP says:
    @Gerard1234
    @AP


    You were caught posting from some post-industrial shithole in northern England. The worst place to live in England. What a loser. I guess a Sovok untermensch “civil engineer” is good for cleaning an abandoned factory.
     
    LMAO. An amusing lie. Just sums up the tactics a compulsive liar sociopathic fuckwit as yourself will amusingly do.....from the gutter.


    Do they appreciate your gender fluidity (you have admitted it)?
     
    Bizarre, idiotic and of course another LIE. Mr Hack , different to you, is at least "Ukrainian" diaspora. Fantasizing about having Mr Hack's life is almost as pathetic as plagiarising his own stupid jokes on here. LOL

    How is life among the Pakistani gangs?
     
    Again, truly bizarre. Highly indicative of the fact you aren't ukrainian or have any connection to the people there, because any ACTUAL diaspora would be concerned that Pakistani gangs would have been fully involved with Ukrainain women in the last year......except probably its more the "cultured" Albanian and Polish gangs throughout Europe who are, en masse, using Ukrainian whores to service them in the brothel/human traffiking markets.

    What Pakistani gangs are in Kazan you mentally sick retard!!???

    Anyway, - Pakistani gangs as far as I know, would be UK based, and though they are also blatantly using ukrainian whores, en masse, to service them in the brothel/human traffiking markets, the UK is not the main areas for this. But Britain , despite having a huge role in creating , demographically catastrophic numbers of ukronazis dying.....is only having a relatively small amount of ukrop refugees in comparison to everyone else. From what I hear, over 50% of them are there only because they have family already in UK ( Banderetard excrement smuggled out by MI6 and post-soviet diaspora), so the Pakistani gangs are not as prolific with Galician whores as the Albanian and Polish gangs in continental Europe. This is the life their western backers have lead them too. Anyway at least they are providing entertainment to my great friend Mikel, with the beastiality and sick-stuff with dwarves that Galician whores are filming

    Also the place name goes on fonetics regrading the latin translations you retard

    Replies: @YetAnotherAnon, @AP

    You were caught posting from some post-industrial shithole in northern England. The worst place to live in England. What a loser. I guess a Sovok untermensch “civil engineer” is good for cleaning an abandoned factory.

    LMAO. An amusing lie.

    No, you were caught:

    https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-158/#comment-4794762

    “reminding people that you consistently post from somewhere in NW England (a region of 7 million people, so hardly a dox), in the context of your claimed authority as a denizen of Kazan”

    Your references to English football give you away.

    You moved to the crappiest part of England with your pseudo-degree, to live amongst the Pakistani grooming gangs. You are an untermensch, what better to expect?

    Do you work construction? General labor might be all your education is worth. Do you clean toilets? Drive an uber? You mention whores a lot. Maybe that’s your thing?

    You used to pretend you were a woman:

    https://www.unz.com/comments/all/?commenterfilter=Ms+Karlin-Gerard

    Pakistani gangs as far as I know, would be UK based

    Of course you would know. It’s your social circles.

    more the “cultured” Albanian and Polish gangs throughout Europe who are, en masse, using Ukrainian whores

    But at least with your words above, you confirm that Donbas is Ukraine.

    This is your world, low class gangs and whores. It’s all you can write about with supposed authority. Your people.

    Maybe you have forgotten Russian because you have lived there too long?

    You didn’t even know the Russian word for “watch”:

    https://www.unz.com/akarlin/god-truly-does-have-a-sense-of-humor/#comment-3472709

  1003. @LatW
    @LatW

    Btw, there is an interesting phenomenon of the Old Believer business culture based on the "община" ("community") principle, which is different from the more individualist types of capitalism (it had to do with the Old Believers not having crediting). It's very democratic and similar to the co-ops in the West. One can even say that it was a kind of a "network state" that operated in the pre-revolutionary Russia, especially Moscow. They rode the wave of the massive urbanization and growth of manufacturing of the time.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

    I watched this series of documentaries and I also found them very interesting. I agree with what you wrote about two parallel societies coexisting after Peter the Great reforms. I have often described the Russian Imperial two headed eagle as a split personality bird.

    Yes, the “deep people” were still very much Old Believer by the time of Nicholas the Ist, and the Old Believer
    merchant elites played an important role in the evolution of Russia in the second half of the nineteenth century and the early twentieth century. It is them who have encouraged the development of what we see today as typical Silver Age (Серебрянный Век) Russian art.

    The Tretyakov brothers, Morozov, Mamontov: Moskovite Old Believer business tycoon, patrons of the arts and philanthropists all of them. They were deeply Russian, when compared to cosmopolitan and Western Europe oriented Saint-Petersburg elites. And yes, they had a conflicted relationship with the Tsarist social organization and the Romanov dynasty. That is why they did not hesitate to help the revolutionaries against absolutism.

    Pyzhykov has done a lot for the study of the Old Believer impact on the Russian society. He was an exceptionally gifted historian. His forte was working with the documents in the archives. He always dug as deep as possible in the subject of his studies.

    It is therefore unfortunate that he was not able to complete his work on the remnants of Paganism in Tsarist Russian Empire before his untimely death. In the few interviews he gave on this topic, he shared his amazement at finding that a whole Pagan outlook could still be reconstructed through looking into the nineteenth century ethnology, anthropology and mythology studies of the Russian peasant populations, studies results that he found preserved in the archives.

    He was preparing a publication describing this Pagan outlook, which according to him most probably pervaded entirely the life of the ancient Slavic peoples. He died of a stroke, while working in the archives with the documents, something that he adored doing.

    May he rest in peace.

    • Replies: @LatW
    @Ivashka the fool


    It is therefore unfortunate that he was not able to complete his work on the remnants of Paganism in Tsarist Russian Empire before his untimely death. In the few interviews he gave on this topic, he shared his amazement at finding that a whole Pagan outlook could still be reconstructed through looking into the nineteenth century ethnology, anthropology and mythology studies of the Russian peasant populations, studies results that he found preserved in the archives.

     

    I'm going to listen to some of his interviews re: Paganism, it's important that someone is found to continue that work (we have completed similar work). At least, there are archives.

    Btw, the Kuznetsov family who were Old Believers built a porcelain factory in Riga that became successful and famous across the whole Empire (and probably beyond), created a beautiful porcelain tradition. Raw materials for the Riga factory came from the internal provinces of the Empire, as well as from Germany, Holland, France, Scandinavia, coal - from England. Part of the finished products were sold on the domestic market and in other provinces of the Russian Empire, the rest were exported to England, Holland and other countries. The Kuznetsov family apparently had 13 such factories across the Empire.
  1004. @Sean
    @Ivashka the fool


    It would be aging relatively rapidly without them
     
    What are the advantages of a growing population of ever younger people for a country such as France that is not planning on fighting an existential war and is post industrial?

    It seems to me the business class reaps the benefits, inasmuch as it stops wages rising in jobs that cannot be offshored (construction service industry occupations), and because the growth is all immigrant descended it inhibits working class cohesion and organisation. Reserve armies of immigrant descended labour are already at a loose end and making their own entertainment; with coming automisation from AI the unemployment among them will only get worse.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

    I mostly agree. Of course further increase in immigrant population is completely unnecessary. But OTOH, someone has to pay the retirement/pension/ social security that in France are amongst the most generous in the World. Pension funds are probably the most important part of the necessity of having a younger population. Remember that the French have recently vigorously manifested against the rising of the age of retirement. Anyways, manifestations and strikes are very much an integral part of French culture

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @Ivashka the fool

    French immigration is pretty dysgenic, no?

    https://www.unz.com/akarlin/not-sending-their-best/

    https://www.unz.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/world-map-iq-drop-due-to-immigration.png

  1005. LatW says:
    @Sean
    @Mr. XYZ


    And Yes, the West certainly wanted to turn Ukraine into a pro-Western development model for the rest of the East Slavic world.
     
    Apart from Russia which was explicitly told it could not join the EU, and found it there was an unspoken agreement it was not allowed to join NATO. So all the Eastern Slavic countries (and Georgia) added to the Western European ones would in NATO and the EU. On the other side, just Russia. I am surprised the Russians could not see the great and ever growing advantages there would be in this arrangement for them.

    The Transnistria deal involved giving Transnistria veto power over Moldovan policies, no?
     
    Formally instituted rather than gave. The 1992 conflict showed that Moldavia may have thought it was master in its own house and Transnistria and its backers had to like it or lump it, but such was not the case. I think the 2008 invasion of Georgia, the 2014 hybrid war in Donbass and annexation of Crimea, and the 2022 full scale assaults on Kiev show that, whatever rights those countries thought international law gave them to make whatever alliances they wished without reference to Russia there always was a brute force veto if the Russians dared use it. And that went for Georgia, and now Ukraine in being taught the same lesson by force too.

    Surely it is better to have the Russian veto formalized as belonging to an autonomous regions of Russian speaking Ukrainians in the constitutional arrangements of the country so it could live in peace than proceeding as if Russia would be forced to swallow it because it ethically ought to? It might have but it was barely possible in the real world.


    Noted: George Kennan on NATO Expansion
    Excerpt from George F. Kennan, “A Fateful Error,” New York Times, 05 Feb 1997

    “Why, with all the hopeful possibilities engendered by the end of the Cold War, should East-West relations become centered on the question of who would be allied with whom and, by implication, against whom in some fanciful, totally unforeseeable and most improbable future military conflict?”

    “[B]luntly stated…expanding NATO would be the most fateful error of American policy in the entire post-Cold War era. Such a decision may be expected to inflame the nationalistic, anti-Western and militaristic tendencies in Russian opinion; to have an adverse effect on the development of Russian democracy; to restore the atmosphere of the cold war to East-West relations, and to impel Russian foreign policy in directions decidedly not to our liking … ”

     

    They were not literally impelled to invade Ukraine of course; they could have decided failure to maintains Russia's position was less bad that being morally turpitude of an invasion.

    Replies: @LatW, @Mr. XYZ

    I think the 2008 invasion of Georgia, the 2014 hybrid war in Donbass and annexation of Crimea, and the 2022 full scale assaults on Kiev show that, whatever rights those countries thought international law gave them to make whatever alliances they wished without reference to Russia there always was a brute force veto if the Russians dared use it.

    You’re essentially admitting that international law doesn’t work. The question is why are others then obligated to abide by it? Especially at home. Basically what follows from what you’re saying is that in the current environment of the non-existent or unenforceable international law, any nation that cares about its safety and survival should be allowed to introduce whatever laws they see fit (or what serves their interests). And this is a road to fascist states (for those who can pull it off).

    States such as Israel, that are continuously at war (and this is what this would be, if we accept your stance), are very rare, since Israel managed to maintain a democratic system, despite being at war. Do not count on most states being able to pull this off. Israel, too, at one point could’ve turned into a dictatorship.

    So based on what you are saying, what follows from it, is that the Ukrainian nation has full rights to act as they see fit in order to secure the survival of their people. At their own risk, of course.

    • Replies: @Sean
    @LatW


    So based on what you are saying, what follows from it, is that the Ukrainian nation has full rights to act as they see fit in order to secure the survival of their people. At their own risk, of course.
     
    Yes. There were a range of options for Ukraine. It could have remained within the Russian Federation, that was a safe option (as long as the Russians did not repeat the deliberate starvation of Ukrainians practiced in the 30s). It could have left RusFed and become a nation state but reached an understanding with Russia and taken post WW2 Finland as a model. With Finnish type policy, Ukraine would become a somewhat Westernised county but without any kind of strategic alliance with Nato and the EU. Russia would have had little reason to cause trouble for a Finlandised Ukraine, and every reason to keep Ukraine sweet with favourable trade deals and energy subsidies.

    It seems to me that the trajectory of Ukraine since independence has been one of trying to join the West; a mere decade after it became a sovereign state Ukraine hosted military exercises by Nato member countries, including some actually on Crimea itself. I suppose it is only natural that they wanted to cut the old links to Russia, but Ukraine had its chance and made its own choice. I just don't think they thought it through. By my way of thinking Ukraine allowed themselves to be gulled out of the actual measure of security it had in to chase an illusionary prospect of absolute safety in Nato and prosperity in the EU such as Poland achieved. Tell me Ukraine does not feel badly let down by the West.

    Replies: @Wokechoke

    , @Wokechoke
    @LatW

    About what exactly do Israelis disagree among themselves? Nothing of any substance. The Diaspora have not to my knowledge done or even advocated for sustained violence among themselves over any issue. Given that the Jews have been in perpetual war with their neighbors the conspicuous lack of violent dissidence is a hallmark of it not being truly democratic.


    The consensus among the jews is extraordinary, and they certainly do not permit this sort of cohesion among German, Brits, Americans etc who all all at each other's throats in their own political community (over extraordinarily trivial trifles). Through arms and proxy force like the US and UK the Israelis divide up their Arab neighbors into morsels and this pattern of unquestioned foreign policy support is never legally challenged among those democratic electorates.

    Replies: @LatW

  1006. LatW says:
    @YetAnotherAnon
    @LatW

    The problem was that the people in Donbass and Luhansk (not to mention Crimea) didn't want be be part of Ukraine after the 2014 revolution/coup, inspired by the US.

    NATO themselves had set a precedent when they bombed Serbia* in order to destroy Serbia's very vital borders and let the majority population in Kosovo secede.

    * bombing directly aimed at water, sewage, power supply as well as military targets.

    Did you protest against the attack on Serbia's very vital borders by NATO?

    Replies: @LatW, @Mr. XYZ

    The problem was that the people in Donbass and Luhansk (not to mention Crimea) didn’t want be be part of Ukraine after the 2014 revolution/coup, inspired by the US.

    There was a foreign intervention there. Also, some of the people were saying things like “Путин введи войска!” (Putin, bring in the troops!), openly agitating for an invasion by a hostile (and much larger) state. If this was happening in your own country, would you be ok with that? Of course, not.

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @LatW

    Kosovo set a nasty example.

    , @YetAnotherAnon
    @LatW

    "There was a foreign intervention there. "

    We all know about Nuland.

    By contrast, the peoples of the Donbass and Luhansk were begging for Russian intervention for seven years until 2022, when the Ukr military buildup and increase in shelling finally caused Russia to act.

    To be fair to Russia, they'd probably spent that time sanction-proofing their economy.

    Distressing footage here of the Ukrainian army in Mariupol, 2014, using guns on civilians and tanks on the local police.

    https://t.me/llordofwar/167950

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

  1007. @AP
    @Ivashka the fool


    Les pieds noirs didn’t recognize themselves as Algerian or African. In fact, to be more precise, they had just started to culturally evolve in that direction, something that Afrikaners have also done in South Africa.
     
    The humane solution would have been to give them their own homeland in Oran. Compensation for centuries of slave raiding.

    Perhaps these deracinated looters and rioters can be provided with a homeland of some sort, also, away from French cities. Maybe in Algeria, send them there with all their assets, they must have something.

    Old Europe is doomed. It’s going the way of the dodo bird
     
    The pessimism of someone without Faith. Who knows? This might inspire an awakening.

    And it is not the working class Muslim kids who enabled its demise, but the likes of Von Coudenhove-Kalergi and his Habsburg allies. A pure product of the Austro-Hungarian multicultural milieu that you admire so much.
     
    Austria-Hungary was a traditionalist state. It's diversity was pre-nationalist, not post-nationalist. That is a huge difference. Had the correct side won World War I, we would not have such a mess.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Mr. XYZ

    The humane solution would have been to give them their own homeland in Oran.

    Well, yes there were talks of l’Oranie being excluded from the independence deal. But one should remember that De Gaule wanted to disentangle France from the Maghreb entirely. He did that because being the very intelligent man that he was, he understood that keeping ten million Algerians as French citizens would be impossible for the French state. Remember that they were citizens at the time, Algeria was not a colony, but un département de la République. Today Algerians number around 40 million people, of which some 5 millions live in France. Imagine if France had to manage 40 millions of Algerians. Algerians would probably reach population parity with France in this generation or the next. De Gaule was right, a separation was absolutely required.

    Unfortunately, a complete severing of the ties proved impossible, not in the least because De Gaule has been chased from power 6 years after the Algerian independence by the Globalist chienlit (to use De Gaule’s expression about the May 1968 protests). Those who came after De Gaule, had the Globalist financial circles interests close to their heart and started a mass migration process.

    Where De Gaule wanted an independent, strong and stable France, those who came after him, both left and right, were more or less Globalist and Atlanticist. Of which Macron (a former Rothschild employee) is a typical example.

    Maybe in Algeria, send them there with all their assets, they must have something.

    Algerians back home despise these types. And they are not just Algerians, there are many sub-Saharan Africans and other Maghrebis. These poor souls are really stuck in the middle. They’ve become the “classless elements”, the lumpen proletaria. Hence their violence.

    The pessimism of someone without Faith. Who knows? This might inspire an awakening.

    The only true Awakening is Awakening of faith in Mahayana.

    🙂

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Awakening_of_Faith_in_the_Mahayana

    Austria-Hungary was a traditionalist state. It’s diversity was pre-nationalist, not post-nationalist.

    That might explain why Kalergi and Otto Von Habsburg worked to undermine European nation states. After all, an aristocracy is always somewhat cosmopolitan. The social function is more important than the ethnicity of the aristocrat. And the aristocracy primary competitors always were the middle class bourgeois which are the carriers of the national spirit. No wonder that after the fall of the Empire, these Austro-Hungarian aristocrats did all they could to weaken the European nations’ middle class, including by promoting the Jewish preeminence, immigration and misgenation.

    Had the correct side won World War I, we would not have such a mess.

    There shouldn’t have been a WWI, it was a catastrophe that started the Europe’s unraveling, to much Anglo-American and Jewish applause…

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @Ivashka the fool


    There shouldn’t have been a WWI, it was a catastrophe that started the Europe’s unraveling, to much Anglo-American and Jewish applause…

     

    Austria-Hungary's greatest mistake was not decisively taking care of the Serbian problem back in 1904-1905 when Russia was busy dealing with a war against Japan and an internal revolution. Instead, A-H waited too long to solve the Serbian problem, long enough for Russia to recover and to be capable of fighting against it.

    Going farther back, it would have probably been great had Catherine the Great's Greek Plan actually been implemented. It would have given Austria-Hungary control over Serbia without any questions asked.
    , @Mr. XYZ
    @Ivashka the fool


    That might explain why Kalergi and Otto Von Habsburg worked to undermine European nation states. After all, an aristocracy is always somewhat cosmopolitan. The social function is more important than the ethnicity of the aristocrat. And the aristocracy primary competitors always were the middle class bourgeois which are the carriers of the national spirit. No wonder that after the fall of the Empire, these Austro-Hungarian aristocrats did all they could to weaken the European nations’ middle class, including by promoting the Jewish preeminence, immigration and misgenation.
     
    I think that advocating in favor of a European Union is a very noble goal, after all. Europeans do have a shared history and common (historically Christian) culture, after all.
    , @AP
    @Ivashka the fool


    And the aristocracy primary competitors always were the middle class bourgeois which are the carriers of the national spirit.
     
    No. The carriers of the national spirit were the peasantry. The middle class bourgeoisie were the carriers of nationalism.

    There is a difference.

    The bourgeoisie were the enemies of both the peasants and of the aristocracy. They in part cannibalized the spirit of the former as part of their method of brainwashing and organising the masses for the purpose of seizing power from the latter. This was done through mass literacy. The result is that the bourgeoisie took over their nations and then the nations engaged in mutual mass slaughter. Celine very eloquently described this process.

    But in the early stages, in the Vendee, it was bourgeoisie head-choppers/mass killer versus both aristocrats and peasants.

    A nuance in Eastern Europe was that there wasn’t much of a bourgeoisie, so this role was often played by petty gentry. So in Polish Austria the nobles who had become nationalists rebelled against the Hapsburgs. The peasants hadn’t yet become literate however, so they defended the Emperor and slaughtered the rebels.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Mr. Hack, @Coconuts, @Mr. XYZ

  1008. LatW says:
    @Ivashka the fool
    @LatW

    I watched this series of documentaries and I also found them very interesting. I agree with what you wrote about two parallel societies coexisting after Peter the Great reforms. I have often described the Russian Imperial two headed eagle as a split personality bird.

    Yes, the "deep people" were still very much Old Believer by the time of Nicholas the Ist, and the Old Believer
    merchant elites played an important role in the evolution of Russia in the second half of the nineteenth century and the early twentieth century. It is them who have encouraged the development of what we see today as typical Silver Age (Серебрянный Век) Russian art.

    The Tretyakov brothers, Morozov, Mamontov: Moskovite Old Believer business tycoon, patrons of the arts and philanthropists all of them. They were deeply Russian, when compared to cosmopolitan and Western Europe oriented Saint-Petersburg elites. And yes, they had a conflicted relationship with the Tsarist social organization and the Romanov dynasty. That is why they did not hesitate to help the revolutionaries against absolutism.

    Pyzhykov has done a lot for the study of the Old Believer impact on the Russian society. He was an exceptionally gifted historian. His forte was working with the documents in the archives. He always dug as deep as possible in the subject of his studies.

    It is therefore unfortunate that he was not able to complete his work on the remnants of Paganism in Tsarist Russian Empire before his untimely death. In the few interviews he gave on this topic, he shared his amazement at finding that a whole Pagan outlook could still be reconstructed through looking into the nineteenth century ethnology, anthropology and mythology studies of the Russian peasant populations, studies results that he found preserved in the archives.

    He was preparing a publication describing this Pagan outlook, which according to him most probably pervaded entirely the life of the ancient Slavic peoples. He died of a stroke, while working in the archives with the documents, something that he adored doing.

    May he rest in peace.

    Replies: @LatW

    It is therefore unfortunate that he was not able to complete his work on the remnants of Paganism in Tsarist Russian Empire before his untimely death. In the few interviews he gave on this topic, he shared his amazement at finding that a whole Pagan outlook could still be reconstructed through looking into the nineteenth century ethnology, anthropology and mythology studies of the Russian peasant populations, studies results that he found preserved in the archives.

    I’m going to listen to some of his interviews re: Paganism, it’s important that someone is found to continue that work (we have completed similar work). At least, there are archives.

    Btw, the Kuznetsov family who were Old Believers built a porcelain factory in Riga that became successful and famous across the whole Empire (and probably beyond), created a beautiful porcelain tradition. Raw materials for the Riga factory came from the internal provinces of the Empire, as well as from Germany, Holland, France, Scandinavia, coal – from England. Part of the finished products were sold on the domestic market and in other provinces of the Russian Empire, the rest were exported to England, Holland and other countries. The Kuznetsov family apparently had 13 such factories across the Empire.

  1009. QCIC says:
    @AP
    @QCIC

    The problem with Ritter is not that he is distasteful, but that he is a fool. Or rather, writes like one. His grift may make him money from fools who value his "insights."

    Replies: @QCIC

    I agree that predicting the outcome of battles and the short term progress of the fighting is a fool’s errand. This does not undermine the significance of Ritter’s historical discussions. I don’t know if he still covers that material, but it is archived somewhere. Maybe it is in his book.

  1010. QCIC says:
    @Mr. Hack
    @QCIC

    I've already favored you with a photo of a beautiful Ukrainian woman within comment #890. You're on your own now. :-)

    Replies: @QCIC

    I did see the fine redhead Alina @ #890. I had hoped the second woman was a sign of a new trend to replace your mildly entertaining (at best) Zelensky cartoons. Too bad.

    I have wondered if there are a bunch of people with Slavic-Hispanic ancestry in places like Cuba. Maybe these folks have what it takes to save the world.

  1011. @AP
    @Ivashka the fool


    Les pieds noirs didn’t recognize themselves as Algerian or African. In fact, to be more precise, they had just started to culturally evolve in that direction, something that Afrikaners have also done in South Africa.
     
    The humane solution would have been to give them their own homeland in Oran. Compensation for centuries of slave raiding.

    Perhaps these deracinated looters and rioters can be provided with a homeland of some sort, also, away from French cities. Maybe in Algeria, send them there with all their assets, they must have something.

    Old Europe is doomed. It’s going the way of the dodo bird
     
    The pessimism of someone without Faith. Who knows? This might inspire an awakening.

    And it is not the working class Muslim kids who enabled its demise, but the likes of Von Coudenhove-Kalergi and his Habsburg allies. A pure product of the Austro-Hungarian multicultural milieu that you admire so much.
     
    Austria-Hungary was a traditionalist state. It's diversity was pre-nationalist, not post-nationalist. That is a huge difference. Had the correct side won World War I, we would not have such a mess.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Mr. XYZ

    The humane solution would have been to give them their own homeland in Oran. Compensation for centuries of slave raiding.

    Algeria would still be pissed off and many pieds-noirs would still be dislocated since many, if not most, of them did not live in the Oran area.

    Oran is the most logical place for France to keep if it insists on keeping any part of Algeria in 1962. It was European for around 400 of the last 500 years. But again, it would strain relations with Algeria for a relatively small gain.

    Perhaps these deracinated looters and rioters can be provided with a homeland of some sort, also, away from French cities. Maybe in Algeria, send them there with all their assets, they must have something.

    I’m unsure if President Tebboune would actually be willing to welcome them with open arms. Why would he need more potential troublemakers after dealing with the hirak movement just a couple of years ago?

    Austria-Hungary was a traditionalist state. It’s diversity was pre-nationalist, not post-nationalist. That is a huge difference. Had the correct side won World War I, we would not have such a mess.

    I’m unsure that a wave of liberalism would not have eventually swept the Central Powers countries had they won World War I. They would not have been immune to social trends, you know?

    In such a scenario, you could potentially eventually see large-scale Muslim immigration into the Central Powers countries, unless of course the Ottoman Empire itself is so attractive that Muslims prefer going there instead of going to Germany and Austria-Hungary (and Poland). (In real life, Communism kept most of the Hapsburg realm as well as the former PLC almost ethnically pure, which won’t be the case in a no-Communism TL.)

    In any case, the Central Powers can primarily blame themselves for losing WWI by invading Belgium (thus bringing Britain into WWI), launching the Zimmerman Telegram, and launching USW (thus bringing the US into WWI). Had the CPs had the benefit of hindsight, they would not have done at least the last two things here, if not all three of these things.

  1012. @AP
    @Ivashka the fool


    These rioters are not migrants. They were born there, with their parents most probably born there. They are French citizens of legal immigrant descent. Just like your ancestors were immigrants to America, Australia or wherever you live in.
     
    They are born in someone else's homeland, and are behaving as insolent guests.

    They should be expelled, as Europeans were expelled from Africa (even those born there, such as pied noir whose roots in Algeria were deeper than those of these vandals and who had contributed more to their adoptive homeland than these parasites have done).

    Not all of them, but anyone participating in the riots in any way.

    A good thing about these riots is that they highlight to everyone that it is bad to allow non-Europeans to settle in Europe. The Polish PM has already mentioned them. The riots will make it easier for the non-Muslim part of Europe to stay clean and health. In that way they are like a vaccine.

    Problem is, they are very hard, nearly impossible to integrate and assimilate.
     
    All the more reason to remove them.

    Polish PM Morawiecki:

    "Our plan is a Europe of Secure Borders - security and public order - these are the values ​​from which everything else begins!"

    He posts a video contrasting France with peaceful Poland:

    The caption at the end of the video states - "we don't want such scene on Polish streets, safety of Poles above all"



    https://twitter.com/MorawieckiM/status/1674855346387537920?s=20

    Replies: @Anatoly Karlin, @Ivashka the fool, @Mr. XYZ, @Mr. XYZ, @Mr. XYZ, @Gerard1234

    They are born in someone else’s homeland, and are behaving as insolent guests.

    They should be expelled, as Europeans were expelled from Africa (even those born there, such as pied noir whose roots in Algeria were deeper than those of these vandals and who had contributed more to their adoptive homeland than these parasites have done).

    Not all of them, but anyone participating in the riots in any way.

    A good thing about these riots is that they highlight to everyone that it is bad to allow non-Europeans to settle in Europe. The Polish PM has already mentioned them. The riots will make it easier for the non-Muslim part of Europe to stay clean and health. In that way they are like a vaccine.

    Seems like the primary problem here is with working-class Muslims and Africans, no? I don’t seem to recall Hindus, Sikhs, non-Muslim Asians (East Asians, Vietnamese, Thais, Filipinos, et cetera), or Latin Americans causing such problems in Europe. Am I right? So, it really is a couple of groups with excessively large numbers of bad apples rather than non-Europeans as a whole.

    The US allowed large numbers of non-Europeans and partial Europeans to settle in the US since 1965 and it has turned out much better. The US’s main problems are with its black descendants of slaves population, not with its immigrants and their descendants. Canada, Australia, and New Zealand also had successful immigration policies, in their cases, tilted more heavily towards cognitive elites than the US’s (which also resulted in the importation of a lot of cognitive elites and a lot of working-class Latin Americans as well).

  1013. @AP
    @Coconuts


    Ha, I live in one of the most dangerous areas.

     

    My condolences. Well, ut has at least produced some great music. And one of the best commenters here :-)

    I have a friend who is a civil engineer in Manchester; they live in one of the Manchester suburbs that has similar house prices and income levels to the Home Counties around London

     

    Your friend probably didn’t get his degree from a third rate Soviet institute and didn’t come over to work construction or whatever because the shambolic state that produced him and that he still supports collapsed..

    There are some very nice areas around Detroit also (engineers in the auto industry have high incomes), yet overall the place is a shithole. It has, like Manchester, produced some great music though.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @Mr. XYZ

    There are some very nice areas around Detroit also (engineers in the auto industry have high incomes), yet overall the place is a shithole. It has, like Manchester, produced some great music though.

    I would presume that heavily white suburbs of Detroit such as Livonia are fairly nice. AFAIK, most Detroit suburbs are heavily white. The ones that aren’t are probably significantly less pleasant.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
    @Mr. XYZ

    I would presume that heavily white suburbs of Detroit such as Livonia are fairly nice. AFAIK, most Detroit suburbs are heavily white. The ones that aren’t are probably significantly less pleasant.

    Michigan has a lot of nice burbs. I've been to them. They are nicely kept and filled with guilt ridden Whites that fund Detroit.

    But even with nice burbs you run into the gas up problem.

    Detroit thugs don't take a vow to stay in the city. Even 30 minutes outside a ghetto you will see quite the characters at night.

    There is a lot of focus on the shootings but they tend to be concentrated unlike the general shenanigans that spillover into nearby areas.

    Having a lime green charger pass you at 120 in a 40 is when you really question if living that close is a good idea.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

  1014. @Ivashka the fool
    @A123


    Will migrant areas be cordoned off and left to burn? That is the obvious choice to save the lives of French policemen.
     
    These rioters are not migrants. They were born there, with their parents most probably born there. They are French citizens of legal immigrant descent. Just like your ancestors were immigrants to America, Australia or wherever you live in.

    Problem is, they are very hard, nearly impossible to integrate and assimilate. There are too many of them and the French society is dysfunctional because of its decaying morals. It is an old and rotten society, while these kids are energetic and passionate.

    Same with RusFed and its Central Asian gastarbaiters or its DICh youth.

    These kids are the future.

    If they organize enough they will represent a force to be acknowledged, just like Barbarians have become in the decaying Roman Empire.

    Replies: @AP, @Coconuts

    Problem is, they are very hard, nearly impossible to integrate and assimilate. There are too many of them and the French society is dysfunctional because of its decaying morals. It is an old and rotten society, while these kids are energetic and passionate.

    Probably one of the problems with the idea of integration, whether in France or Britain, has been that no one had any contingency plans about what to do if it didn’t happen naturally and pretty spontaneously.

    Now I would agree that there doesn’t seem to be any political force in France that has the will or capability to implement something like this. It looks like the ‘old French’ on the right are becoming less interested in making any concessions and the left are getting influenced by Anglo trends:

    I think one of the better anti-Woke books for a broad audience, the author knows the original French sources and debates in sociology. But the new ‘Anglo-Saxon communitarianism’ is obviously gaining ground on the left and in academia. If it managed to alter the traditional Republican citizenship tradition in France itself that would be a big thing.

    Imo the risk would be that there is still enough vitality among the old French to hold out against any major change and to reinforce the police, but not enough to resolve the problem, so the riots keep recurring, maybe getting gradually more serious and edgy each time. The fact that civil disorder from other parts of the population keeps happening simultaneously doesn’t help. Spread of Woke could just make the problems insoluble.

  1015. S says:
    @Emil Nikola Richard
    @S

    Fine find!

    It looks really obscure to me. Did you spend of lot of time to dig that out? Did you get lucky? Do you have some wizard who feeds you good clues?

    The thing about information is it costs you absolutely nothing to give it away and enriches anybody else who is in the watershed.

    Replies: @S

    Fine find!

    Thanks. 🙂

    It looks really obscure to me. Did you spend of lot of time to dig that out? Did you get lucky? Do you have some wizard who feeds you good clues?

    It is obscure.

    There are two huge free on-line libraries of scanned in American 19th century books, journals, and periodicals run by the U of Michigan and U of Chicago called ‘Making of America’.

    I wanted to understand the United States and what it was (and is) about, so I spent many hundreds (if not thousands) of hours reading word by word, page by page, cover to cover, and, issue by issue, very large swathes of those two library’s periodicals, journals, and books. I compared notes between those 19th century journals, and journals today, on various subjects, and, irregardless of my own prior opinion(s), ‘let the chips fall where they may’, to get at the truth of the matter.

    My conclusion was that quite a lot about what they teach regarding the history of the United States today doesn’t jive with the original source materials, and there’s quite a lot of convenient ‘lying by omission’.

    So, yes, quite a lot of time, but not luck (per se), or, wizards.

    I’d compare my experience perusing 19th century literature with what gold miners do when they time consumingly process hundreds and thousands of tons of potentially promising ore, 99 percent plus of it ultimately being dross. It’s those occasional nuggets, like the Gregory quote being discussed here, or, that equally obscure 1853 New Rome book, or, Roger Casement’s 1915 The Crime Against Europe in regards to WWI, amongst other similar generally unknown items, which have made it all worth it in the end.

    The thing about information is it costs you absolutely nothing to give it away and enriches anybody else who is in the watershed.

    Yes, I have posted a great deal in regards to the more purely Anglo-Saxon aspects of the history of the US/UK (and Anglosphere in general) as I don’t think this particular subject is as well understood as it ought to be, and anyone who wishes may borrow freely from those posts without attribution if they so desire. I think this is the case because the US/UK and Anglosphere (for the moment) are still ongoing concerns.

    I think once the Fall of Capitalism takes place, ie the impending economic and political collapse of the United States and it’s Western bloc, that a great many secrets about the US/UK will then be revealed, albeit perhaps only briefly, just as when the Fall of Communism took place and the secrets of the Soviet Union were briefly revealed.

    It is my hope that perhaps some of these secrets about the US/UK being revealed now before the fact (rather than after) might be of use to those who are of good will.

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @S


    the Fall of Capitalism
     
    The polite way to talk about it is calling it the Great Reset.

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard

  1016. Was crossing a stream today, taking my time because the rocks were slippery, when I heard a splash. At first I thought I had dropped something, but I looked up and saw the most magnificent bear, crossing about 20 feet away.

    Which reminds me of a puzzling question: when a bear attacks a women in mentruus, in a tent, is it just because the smell of blood, or is it because the bear smells female hormones and intuitively understands that it is a weak target?

    • Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
    @songbird

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yLis6jWc05M&ab_channel=KatieKelly

  1017. @Ivashka the fool
    @AP


    The humane solution would have been to give them their own homeland in Oran.
     
    Well, yes there were talks of l'Oranie being excluded from the independence deal. But one should remember that De Gaule wanted to disentangle France from the Maghreb entirely. He did that because being the very intelligent man that he was, he understood that keeping ten million Algerians as French citizens would be impossible for the French state. Remember that they were citizens at the time, Algeria was not a colony, but un département de la République. Today Algerians number around 40 million people, of which some 5 millions live in France. Imagine if France had to manage 40 millions of Algerians. Algerians would probably reach population parity with France in this generation or the next. De Gaule was right, a separation was absolutely required.

    Unfortunately, a complete severing of the ties proved impossible, not in the least because De Gaule has been chased from power 6 years after the Algerian independence by the Globalist chienlit (to use De Gaule's expression about the May 1968 protests). Those who came after De Gaule, had the Globalist financial circles interests close to their heart and started a mass migration process.

    Where De Gaule wanted an independent, strong and stable France, those who came after him, both left and right, were more or less Globalist and Atlanticist. Of which Macron (a former Rothschild employee) is a typical example.


    Maybe in Algeria, send them there with all their assets, they must have something.
     
    Algerians back home despise these types. And they are not just Algerians, there are many sub-Saharan Africans and other Maghrebis. These poor souls are really stuck in the middle. They've become the "classless elements", the lumpen proletaria. Hence their violence.

    The pessimism of someone without Faith. Who knows? This might inspire an awakening.

     

    The only true Awakening is Awakening of faith in Mahayana.

    🙂

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Awakening_of_Faith_in_the_Mahayana


    Austria-Hungary was a traditionalist state. It’s diversity was pre-nationalist, not post-nationalist.
     
    That might explain why Kalergi and Otto Von Habsburg worked to undermine European nation states. After all, an aristocracy is always somewhat cosmopolitan. The social function is more important than the ethnicity of the aristocrat. And the aristocracy primary competitors always were the middle class bourgeois which are the carriers of the national spirit. No wonder that after the fall of the Empire, these Austro-Hungarian aristocrats did all they could to weaken the European nations' middle class, including by promoting the Jewish preeminence, immigration and misgenation.

    Had the correct side won World War I, we would not have such a mess.

     

    There shouldn't have been a WWI, it was a catastrophe that started the Europe's unraveling, to much Anglo-American and Jewish applause...

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Mr. XYZ, @AP

    There shouldn’t have been a WWI, it was a catastrophe that started the Europe’s unraveling, to much Anglo-American and Jewish applause…

    Austria-Hungary’s greatest mistake was not decisively taking care of the Serbian problem back in 1904-1905 when Russia was busy dealing with a war against Japan and an internal revolution. Instead, A-H waited too long to solve the Serbian problem, long enough for Russia to recover and to be capable of fighting against it.

    Going farther back, it would have probably been great had Catherine the Great’s Greek Plan actually been implemented. It would have given Austria-Hungary control over Serbia without any questions asked.

  1018. @Anatoly Karlin
    @Mr. XYZ

    You should probably just gather any questions you have about network states for the next OT as this one is nearing its end.


    Also, you have previously said that Russia cannot be truly sovereign with only 150 million people, right? Then how exactly are network states supposed to be truly sovereign with population sizes that are astronomically smaller than Russia’s?
     
    Network states concentrate human and financial capital. Average IQ of the Zuzalu attendee might be that of an Ivy League university. So Hive Mind dynamics apply.

    In a world in which the relative power of network states gains and flips that of centralized states, even small network states can be very influential. Membership need not be and in fact cannot be exclusive. To a large extent, some fringe exceptions aside (double/triple citizenships), this doesn't apply to centralized states which impudently claim a monopoly on their denizens' national loyalties. (It's quite ridiculous if one thinks about, states claim something like 40% of GDP as taxes globally, but largely refuse to allow competition for more effective solutions in this sector).

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Mr. XYZ

    BTW, wouldn’t the rise of extraordinarily smart AI make even EHC redundant for economic productivity? After all, wouldn’t extraordinarily smart AI be able to do at least most of the things that EHC is capable of doing?

    If you’re arguing that extraordinarily smart AI makes natalism irrelevant, even for EHC*, why does it not also make EHC itself irrelevant? If having EHC reproduce no longer matters, why exactly does having EHC continue existing matter when extraordinarily smart AI can simply and easily replace them?

    *You won’t be getting more EHC if EHC will refuse to breed since children are, to a large extent, similar to their parents, even after taking regression towards the mean into account.

  1019. @LatW
    @Sean


    I think the 2008 invasion of Georgia, the 2014 hybrid war in Donbass and annexation of Crimea, and the 2022 full scale assaults on Kiev show that, whatever rights those countries thought international law gave them to make whatever alliances they wished without reference to Russia there always was a brute force veto if the Russians dared use it.
     
    You're essentially admitting that international law doesn't work. The question is why are others then obligated to abide by it? Especially at home. Basically what follows from what you're saying is that in the current environment of the non-existent or unenforceable international law, any nation that cares about its safety and survival should be allowed to introduce whatever laws they see fit (or what serves their interests). And this is a road to fascist states (for those who can pull it off).

    States such as Israel, that are continuously at war (and this is what this would be, if we accept your stance), are very rare, since Israel managed to maintain a democratic system, despite being at war. Do not count on most states being able to pull this off. Israel, too, at one point could've turned into a dictatorship.

    So based on what you are saying, what follows from it, is that the Ukrainian nation has full rights to act as they see fit in order to secure the survival of their people. At their own risk, of course.

    Replies: @Sean, @Wokechoke

    So based on what you are saying, what follows from it, is that the Ukrainian nation has full rights to act as they see fit in order to secure the survival of their people. At their own risk, of course.

    Yes. There were a range of options for Ukraine. It could have remained within the Russian Federation, that was a safe option (as long as the Russians did not repeat the deliberate starvation of Ukrainians practiced in the 30s). It could have left RusFed and become a nation state but reached an understanding with Russia and taken post WW2 Finland as a model. With Finnish type policy, Ukraine would become a somewhat Westernised county but without any kind of strategic alliance with Nato and the EU. Russia would have had little reason to cause trouble for a Finlandised Ukraine, and every reason to keep Ukraine sweet with favourable trade deals and energy subsidies.

    It seems to me that the trajectory of Ukraine since independence has been one of trying to join the West; a mere decade after it became a sovereign state Ukraine hosted military exercises by Nato member countries, including some actually on Crimea itself. I suppose it is only natural that they wanted to cut the old links to Russia, but Ukraine had its chance and made its own choice. I just don’t think they thought it through. By my way of thinking Ukraine allowed themselves to be gulled out of the actual measure of security it had in to chase an illusionary prospect of absolute safety in Nato and prosperity in the EU such as Poland achieved. Tell me Ukraine does not feel badly let down by the West.

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @Sean

    What were the joint Ukie NATO maneuvers in Crimea? That's stunning. Never heard about it. What the hell were they doing/thinking? Practicing a Siege on Sevastopol or Sea Battle at Kerch? Good God almighty.

    Replies: @German_reader

  1020. @LatW
    @Sean


    I think the 2008 invasion of Georgia, the 2014 hybrid war in Donbass and annexation of Crimea, and the 2022 full scale assaults on Kiev show that, whatever rights those countries thought international law gave them to make whatever alliances they wished without reference to Russia there always was a brute force veto if the Russians dared use it.
     
    You're essentially admitting that international law doesn't work. The question is why are others then obligated to abide by it? Especially at home. Basically what follows from what you're saying is that in the current environment of the non-existent or unenforceable international law, any nation that cares about its safety and survival should be allowed to introduce whatever laws they see fit (or what serves their interests). And this is a road to fascist states (for those who can pull it off).

    States such as Israel, that are continuously at war (and this is what this would be, if we accept your stance), are very rare, since Israel managed to maintain a democratic system, despite being at war. Do not count on most states being able to pull this off. Israel, too, at one point could've turned into a dictatorship.

    So based on what you are saying, what follows from it, is that the Ukrainian nation has full rights to act as they see fit in order to secure the survival of their people. At their own risk, of course.

    Replies: @Sean, @Wokechoke

    About what exactly do Israelis disagree among themselves? Nothing of any substance. The Diaspora have not to my knowledge done or even advocated for sustained violence among themselves over any issue. Given that the Jews have been in perpetual war with their neighbors the conspicuous lack of violent dissidence is a hallmark of it not being truly democratic.

    The consensus among the jews is extraordinary, and they certainly do not permit this sort of cohesion among German, Brits, Americans etc who all all at each other’s throats in their own political community (over extraordinarily trivial trifles). Through arms and proxy force like the US and UK the Israelis divide up their Arab neighbors into morsels and this pattern of unquestioned foreign policy support is never legally challenged among those democratic electorates.

    • Replies: @LatW
    @Wokechoke

    I didn't mean now, but when Israel was still relatively weak. The kind of cohesion and mobilization of resources that they have achieved (as well as ability to tolerate risk and readiness to accept risk) typically can only be achieved via fascist methods. But they have still maintained a functioning Knesset and, not only that, they also have Arab representation. These kinds of things are normally not permitted when a country and a society is at a permanent state of war.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

  1021. @S
    @Emil Nikola Richard


    Fine find!
     
    Thanks. :-)

    It looks really obscure to me. Did you spend of lot of time to dig that out? Did you get lucky? Do you have some wizard who feeds you good clues?
     
    It is obscure.

    There are two huge free on-line libraries of scanned in American 19th century books, journals, and periodicals run by the U of Michigan and U of Chicago called 'Making of America'.

    I wanted to understand the United States and what it was (and is) about, so I spent many hundreds (if not thousands) of hours reading word by word, page by page, cover to cover, and, issue by issue, very large swathes of those two library's periodicals, journals, and books. I compared notes between those 19th century journals, and journals today, on various subjects, and, irregardless of my own prior opinion(s), 'let the chips fall where they may', to get at the truth of the matter.

    My conclusion was that quite a lot about what they teach regarding the history of the United States today doesn't jive with the original source materials, and there's quite a lot of convenient 'lying by omission'.

    So, yes, quite a lot of time, but not luck (per se), or, wizards.

    I'd compare my experience perusing 19th century literature with what gold miners do when they time consumingly process hundreds and thousands of tons of potentially promising ore, 99 percent plus of it ultimately being dross. It's those occasional nuggets, like the Gregory quote being discussed here, or, that equally obscure 1853 New Rome book, or, Roger Casement's 1915 The Crime Against Europe in regards to WWI, amongst other similar generally unknown items, which have made it all worth it in the end.

    The thing about information is it costs you absolutely nothing to give it away and enriches anybody else who is in the watershed.
     
    Yes, I have posted a great deal in regards to the more purely Anglo-Saxon aspects of the history of the US/UK (and Anglosphere in general) as I don't think this particular subject is as well understood as it ought to be, and anyone who wishes may borrow freely from those posts without attribution if they so desire. I think this is the case because the US/UK and Anglosphere (for the moment) are still ongoing concerns.

    I think once the Fall of Capitalism takes place, ie the impending economic and political collapse of the United States and it's Western bloc, that a great many secrets about the US/UK will then be revealed, albeit perhaps only briefly, just as when the Fall of Communism took place and the secrets of the Soviet Union were briefly revealed.

    It is my hope that perhaps some of these secrets about the US/UK being revealed now before the fact (rather than after) might be of use to those who are of good will.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

    the Fall of Capitalism

    The polite way to talk about it is calling it the Great Reset.

    • LOL: S
    • Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
    @Ivashka the fool

    Where do you think the omicron came from?

    Replies: @John Johnson

  1022. @songbird
    Was crossing a stream today, taking my time because the rocks were slippery, when I heard a splash. At first I thought I had dropped something, but I looked up and saw the most magnificent bear, crossing about 20 feet away.

    Which reminds me of a puzzling question: when a bear attacks a women in mentruus, in a tent, is it just because the smell of blood, or is it because the bear smells female hormones and intuitively understands that it is a weak target?

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard

    • Thanks: songbird
  1023. @Sean
    @Mr. XYZ


    And Yes, the West certainly wanted to turn Ukraine into a pro-Western development model for the rest of the East Slavic world.
     
    Apart from Russia which was explicitly told it could not join the EU, and found it there was an unspoken agreement it was not allowed to join NATO. So all the Eastern Slavic countries (and Georgia) added to the Western European ones would in NATO and the EU. On the other side, just Russia. I am surprised the Russians could not see the great and ever growing advantages there would be in this arrangement for them.

    The Transnistria deal involved giving Transnistria veto power over Moldovan policies, no?
     
    Formally instituted rather than gave. The 1992 conflict showed that Moldavia may have thought it was master in its own house and Transnistria and its backers had to like it or lump it, but such was not the case. I think the 2008 invasion of Georgia, the 2014 hybrid war in Donbass and annexation of Crimea, and the 2022 full scale assaults on Kiev show that, whatever rights those countries thought international law gave them to make whatever alliances they wished without reference to Russia there always was a brute force veto if the Russians dared use it. And that went for Georgia, and now Ukraine in being taught the same lesson by force too.

    Surely it is better to have the Russian veto formalized as belonging to an autonomous regions of Russian speaking Ukrainians in the constitutional arrangements of the country so it could live in peace than proceeding as if Russia would be forced to swallow it because it ethically ought to? It might have but it was barely possible in the real world.


    Noted: George Kennan on NATO Expansion
    Excerpt from George F. Kennan, “A Fateful Error,” New York Times, 05 Feb 1997

    “Why, with all the hopeful possibilities engendered by the end of the Cold War, should East-West relations become centered on the question of who would be allied with whom and, by implication, against whom in some fanciful, totally unforeseeable and most improbable future military conflict?”

    “[B]luntly stated…expanding NATO would be the most fateful error of American policy in the entire post-Cold War era. Such a decision may be expected to inflame the nationalistic, anti-Western and militaristic tendencies in Russian opinion; to have an adverse effect on the development of Russian democracy; to restore the atmosphere of the cold war to East-West relations, and to impel Russian foreign policy in directions decidedly not to our liking … ”

     

    They were not literally impelled to invade Ukraine of course; they could have decided failure to maintains Russia's position was less bad that being morally turpitude of an invasion.

    Replies: @LatW, @Mr. XYZ

    Apart from Russia which was explicitly told it could not join the EU, and found it there was an unspoken agreement it was not allowed to join NATO.

    When you’re assassinating your critics, that’s sort of what happens.

    Surely it is better to have the Russian veto formalized as belonging to an autonomous regions of Russian speaking Ukrainians in the constitutional arrangements of the country so it could live in peace than proceeding as if Russia would be forced to swallow it because it ethically ought to? It might have but it was barely possible in the real world.

    Should Serbia and Poland have capitulated to Austria-Hungary and Nazi Germany in 1914 and 1939, respectively, in an attempt to save lives?

    • Replies: @Sean
    @Mr. XYZ

    The Paris Charter was all well and good, but Russia did not realise if was going to be alone facing all countries it once held suzerainty over now in Nato and the EU. What should happen is a country's concerns ought to be treated concomitantly with its capability and willingness to use force. The idea that the Paris Charter meant Russia would feel compelled to remain passive as Ukraine joined the rest of Eastern Europe in a military alliance Russia was excluded from was silly. George Kennan and others including the current head of the CIA when a diplomat in Moscow, predicted the Russians would end up deciding they had to fight.

    Unfortunately no one listened. In 2000 RusFed was seen as an economic and industrial joke with pretensions to global power projection that were bathetic, as evidenced by the loss of the Kursk. In that year Putin spoke of Russia, which had already been told it could never join the EU, joining Nato (naively, he was to be fobbed off). On 12 September 2001, Putin was the first leader to call George Bush – Putin pledged support and--very much against the wishes of his own military--gave US forces access to bases in Central Asia vital for the initial US campaign in Afghanistan.

    Shortly afterwards the US pressured Moldovia to pull out of a deal resolving the Transnistria frozen conflict. But no matter how weak Russia had become in global reach, it was still quite formidable close to its own borders, yet it was not treated as a force to be reckoned with. I do think Ukrainian politicians ought to have realised that the US was not going to get into a war with Russia over Ukraine, and so Ukraine ought to behave with an eye to Russia's military option for dealing with Ukraine. Finland showed how that could be done successfully. Relying on American led NATO to intimidato Russia out of getting kinetic had not worked for Georgia in 2008, or Ukraine in 2014, so why on earth would anyone expect that Zelensky could make clear he was not compromising on Ukraine's freedom of action (in return for the Donbass being given back to Ukraine), without unpleasant consequences. Was Ukraine under the misapprehension in the aftermath of Ukrainegate and it being the grounds for the impeachment of Trump that now Biden was President, Ukraine had some kind of security guarantee from a powerful protector, one RusFed would be intimidated by. This seems to be the case, what Mearsheimer has called Ukraine being led down the Primrose Path (to being wrecked).

  1024. @Mr. XYZ
    @Anatoly Karlin


    You should probably just gather any questions you have about network states for the next OT as this one is nearing its end.

     

    You can respond to me in the next thread, then! :)

    Network states concentrate human and financial capital. Average IQ of the Zuzalu attendee might be that of an Ivy League university. So Hive Mind dynamics apply.

    In a world in which the relative power of network states gains and flips that of centralized states, even small network states can be very influential. Membership need not be and in fact cannot be exclusive. To a large extent, some fringe exceptions aside (double/triple citizenships), this doesn’t apply to centralized states which impudently claim a monopoly on their denizens’ national loyalties. (It’s quite ridiculous if one thinks about, states claim something like 40% of GDP as taxes globally, but largely refuse to allow competition for more effective solutions in this sector).
     
    Point taken, but even so, even a country like Russia likely has around one million 130+ IQ people. Can any network state actually accumulate such a massive concentration of elite human capital? And of course if we're talking about the US, EU, or China, then we're talking about several million 130+ IQ people for each of them.

    If Mensa International created a network state, it could be quite formidable, no doubt, but even it has only 145,000 members:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mensa_International

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    Even Japan likely has over one million 130+ IQ people, for that matter.

  1025. @Mr. XYZ
    @Anatoly Karlin

    You can respond to me in the next open thread if necessary.


    “Patriot” is close to “patsy” in the dictionary for a reason.
     
    Shouldn't EHC like patriotism since it's essentially a more inclusive (big-tent) nationalism? I seem to recall a lot of Americans being concerned about what Trump and his supporters did on January 6, which does indicate that a love of country still remains among many Americans.

    (BTW, big-tent nationalism has a long history. For instance, some pre-Nazi German nationalists were willing to accept assimilated German Jews into their ranks even though they were not ethnic Germans. Likewise, the founder of the Mladorossi Russian nationalist group was of non-Slavic descent: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Lvovich_Kazembek )

    "Look at how great our countries are! Let's invite more people into them so that they could also share in our countries' national glories!" strikes one as a slogan that EHC can get behind, no?

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    Jamie Raskin, a former law professor and certainly belonging to EHC, played a prominent role in the January 6 inquiry, for instance:

    https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/09/us/jamie-raskin-committee-member-jan-6.html

  1026. @Sean
    @LatW


    So based on what you are saying, what follows from it, is that the Ukrainian nation has full rights to act as they see fit in order to secure the survival of their people. At their own risk, of course.
     
    Yes. There were a range of options for Ukraine. It could have remained within the Russian Federation, that was a safe option (as long as the Russians did not repeat the deliberate starvation of Ukrainians practiced in the 30s). It could have left RusFed and become a nation state but reached an understanding with Russia and taken post WW2 Finland as a model. With Finnish type policy, Ukraine would become a somewhat Westernised county but without any kind of strategic alliance with Nato and the EU. Russia would have had little reason to cause trouble for a Finlandised Ukraine, and every reason to keep Ukraine sweet with favourable trade deals and energy subsidies.

    It seems to me that the trajectory of Ukraine since independence has been one of trying to join the West; a mere decade after it became a sovereign state Ukraine hosted military exercises by Nato member countries, including some actually on Crimea itself. I suppose it is only natural that they wanted to cut the old links to Russia, but Ukraine had its chance and made its own choice. I just don't think they thought it through. By my way of thinking Ukraine allowed themselves to be gulled out of the actual measure of security it had in to chase an illusionary prospect of absolute safety in Nato and prosperity in the EU such as Poland achieved. Tell me Ukraine does not feel badly let down by the West.

    Replies: @Wokechoke

    What were the joint Ukie NATO maneuvers in Crimea? That’s stunning. Never heard about it. What the hell were they doing/thinking? Practicing a Siege on Sevastopol or Sea Battle at Kerch? Good God almighty.

    • Replies: @German_reader
    @Wokechoke

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1997/03/20/us-black-sea-maneuver-plans-spur-rising-russian-distrust/c55f5b89-f21c-4598-a810-95d3e317731b/

    https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1997-aug-29-mn-27057-story.html

  1027. @AP
    @Ivashka the fool


    These rioters are not migrants. They were born there, with their parents most probably born there. They are French citizens of legal immigrant descent. Just like your ancestors were immigrants to America, Australia or wherever you live in.
     
    They are born in someone else's homeland, and are behaving as insolent guests.

    They should be expelled, as Europeans were expelled from Africa (even those born there, such as pied noir whose roots in Algeria were deeper than those of these vandals and who had contributed more to their adoptive homeland than these parasites have done).

    Not all of them, but anyone participating in the riots in any way.

    A good thing about these riots is that they highlight to everyone that it is bad to allow non-Europeans to settle in Europe. The Polish PM has already mentioned them. The riots will make it easier for the non-Muslim part of Europe to stay clean and health. In that way they are like a vaccine.

    Problem is, they are very hard, nearly impossible to integrate and assimilate.
     
    All the more reason to remove them.

    Polish PM Morawiecki:

    "Our plan is a Europe of Secure Borders - security and public order - these are the values ​​from which everything else begins!"

    He posts a video contrasting France with peaceful Poland:

    The caption at the end of the video states - "we don't want such scene on Polish streets, safety of Poles above all"



    https://twitter.com/MorawieckiM/status/1674855346387537920?s=20

    Replies: @Anatoly Karlin, @Ivashka the fool, @Mr. XYZ, @Mr. XYZ, @Mr. XYZ, @Gerard1234

    BTW, Ilya Somin (a US Jewish-American law professor of ex-USSR descent) has argued that if certain crimes are sufficiently bad to warrant deportation, then anyone who engages in such crimes should be deported, regardless of their race, ethnicity, birth place, or national origin:

    https://reason.com/volokh/2018/05/27/the-case-against-deporting-immigrants-co/

    He calls such a policy “equal opportunity deportation”. So, ethnic Europeans in France who engage in identical or at least similar behavior would also be liable to get deported out of France and the EU. Could have an even more eugenic effect that way, interestingly enough. And would be compatible with egalitarian anti-discrimination principles.

    But of course the challenge would be to actually find some country that would be willing to accept all of these convicted criminals. What exactly are you going to offer this country in exchange for this? And will these convicted criminals have to spend jail time in their new country? If so, just how much jail time? I’ve heard that prisons in places like Latin America are not exactly safe for prisoners, after all. Latin America is homicidal as fuck, and this applies to its prisons as well.

  1028. My neighbors from Poland love this music so much that when I play it loud, they throw a brick thru my front window so they can hear it better.

  1029. @LatW
    @YetAnotherAnon


    The problem was that the people in Donbass and Luhansk (not to mention Crimea) didn’t want be be part of Ukraine after the 2014 revolution/coup, inspired by the US.
     
    There was a foreign intervention there. Also, some of the people were saying things like "Путин введи войска!" (Putin, bring in the troops!), openly agitating for an invasion by a hostile (and much larger) state. If this was happening in your own country, would you be ok with that? Of course, not.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @YetAnotherAnon

    Kosovo set a nasty example.

  1030. German_reader says:
    @Wokechoke
    @Sean

    What were the joint Ukie NATO maneuvers in Crimea? That's stunning. Never heard about it. What the hell were they doing/thinking? Practicing a Siege on Sevastopol or Sea Battle at Kerch? Good God almighty.

    Replies: @German_reader

  1031. @YetAnotherAnon
    @LatW

    The problem was that the people in Donbass and Luhansk (not to mention Crimea) didn't want be be part of Ukraine after the 2014 revolution/coup, inspired by the US.

    NATO themselves had set a precedent when they bombed Serbia* in order to destroy Serbia's very vital borders and let the majority population in Kosovo secede.

    * bombing directly aimed at water, sewage, power supply as well as military targets.

    Did you protest against the attack on Serbia's very vital borders by NATO?

    Replies: @LatW, @Mr. XYZ

    The interesting thing is that I myself actually supported Crimean and Donbass separatism between 2014 and 2022. But then when I realized that it simply set the stage for Russia attacking the rest of Ukraine in 2022, I became more hostile towards Crimean and Donbass separatism.

    Similar to how Hitler used his seizure of the Sudetenland in late 1938 as a prelude to his seizure of the rest of Czechia in early 1939, contrary to the principle of national self-determination.

    • Disagree: Mikhail
    • Replies: @Mikhail
    @Mr. XYZ

    https://www.eurasiareview.com/26062023-post-mutiny-assessment-in-russia-oped/

    Excerpt -


    In comparison, no one prominent in Russia backed Prigozhin, who either became an agent of the neocons/neolibs, or a useful idiot for them. His comment that there was no legit basis to attack Ukraine is neocon/neolib is crock.

    The Kiev regime, France and Germany acknowledged they didn’t plan to have the Minsk Accords observed. Under that agreement, Donbass was to achieve autonomy within Ukraine’s Communist drawn boundary. For seven years after the Minsk signing, the Kiev regime was building up its forces with some open talk about doing an Operation Storm– the 1995 ethnic cleansing of at least 150,000 Krajina Serbs with hundreds of casualties in that process. Shortly before February 24, 2022 (the start of Russia’s special military operation), OSCE observers said there was a dramatic increase of Kiev regime shelling at rebel Donbass territory.
     

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    , @Wokechoke
    @Mr. XYZ

    Slovaks got them or own state though. And historical land was given back to Poland in that event.

    Also, the real issue was that Hitler seized the Skoda works and suddenly added 350 Pz38 to his tank inventory at a stroke.

    The Tigers were later in the war built at Skoda.

  1032. @Ivashka the fool
    @AP


    The humane solution would have been to give them their own homeland in Oran.
     
    Well, yes there were talks of l'Oranie being excluded from the independence deal. But one should remember that De Gaule wanted to disentangle France from the Maghreb entirely. He did that because being the very intelligent man that he was, he understood that keeping ten million Algerians as French citizens would be impossible for the French state. Remember that they were citizens at the time, Algeria was not a colony, but un département de la République. Today Algerians number around 40 million people, of which some 5 millions live in France. Imagine if France had to manage 40 millions of Algerians. Algerians would probably reach population parity with France in this generation or the next. De Gaule was right, a separation was absolutely required.

    Unfortunately, a complete severing of the ties proved impossible, not in the least because De Gaule has been chased from power 6 years after the Algerian independence by the Globalist chienlit (to use De Gaule's expression about the May 1968 protests). Those who came after De Gaule, had the Globalist financial circles interests close to their heart and started a mass migration process.

    Where De Gaule wanted an independent, strong and stable France, those who came after him, both left and right, were more or less Globalist and Atlanticist. Of which Macron (a former Rothschild employee) is a typical example.


    Maybe in Algeria, send them there with all their assets, they must have something.
     
    Algerians back home despise these types. And they are not just Algerians, there are many sub-Saharan Africans and other Maghrebis. These poor souls are really stuck in the middle. They've become the "classless elements", the lumpen proletaria. Hence their violence.

    The pessimism of someone without Faith. Who knows? This might inspire an awakening.

     

    The only true Awakening is Awakening of faith in Mahayana.

    🙂

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Awakening_of_Faith_in_the_Mahayana


    Austria-Hungary was a traditionalist state. It’s diversity was pre-nationalist, not post-nationalist.
     
    That might explain why Kalergi and Otto Von Habsburg worked to undermine European nation states. After all, an aristocracy is always somewhat cosmopolitan. The social function is more important than the ethnicity of the aristocrat. And the aristocracy primary competitors always were the middle class bourgeois which are the carriers of the national spirit. No wonder that after the fall of the Empire, these Austro-Hungarian aristocrats did all they could to weaken the European nations' middle class, including by promoting the Jewish preeminence, immigration and misgenation.

    Had the correct side won World War I, we would not have such a mess.

     

    There shouldn't have been a WWI, it was a catastrophe that started the Europe's unraveling, to much Anglo-American and Jewish applause...

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Mr. XYZ, @AP

    That might explain why Kalergi and Otto Von Habsburg worked to undermine European nation states. After all, an aristocracy is always somewhat cosmopolitan. The social function is more important than the ethnicity of the aristocrat. And the aristocracy primary competitors always were the middle class bourgeois which are the carriers of the national spirit. No wonder that after the fall of the Empire, these Austro-Hungarian aristocrats did all they could to weaken the European nations’ middle class, including by promoting the Jewish preeminence, immigration and misgenation.

    I think that advocating in favor of a European Union is a very noble goal, after all. Europeans do have a shared history and common (historically Christian) culture, after all.

  1033. @Ivashka the fool
    @Sean

    I mostly agree. Of course further increase in immigrant population is completely unnecessary. But OTOH, someone has to pay the retirement/pension/ social security that in France are amongst the most generous in the World. Pension funds are probably the most important part of the necessity of having a younger population. Remember that the French have recently vigorously manifested against the rising of the age of retirement. Anyways, manifestations and strikes are very much an integral part of French culture

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    French immigration is pretty dysgenic, no?

    https://www.unz.com/akarlin/not-sending-their-best/

  1034. @Mr. XYZ
    @AP


    There are some very nice areas around Detroit also (engineers in the auto industry have high incomes), yet overall the place is a shithole. It has, like Manchester, produced some great music though.

     

    I would presume that heavily white suburbs of Detroit such as Livonia are fairly nice. AFAIK, most Detroit suburbs are heavily white. The ones that aren't are probably significantly less pleasant.

    Replies: @John Johnson

    I would presume that heavily white suburbs of Detroit such as Livonia are fairly nice. AFAIK, most Detroit suburbs are heavily white. The ones that aren’t are probably significantly less pleasant.

    Michigan has a lot of nice burbs. I’ve been to them. They are nicely kept and filled with guilt ridden Whites that fund Detroit.

    But even with nice burbs you run into the gas up problem.

    Detroit thugs don’t take a vow to stay in the city. Even 30 minutes outside a ghetto you will see quite the characters at night.

    There is a lot of focus on the shootings but they tend to be concentrated unlike the general shenanigans that spillover into nearby areas.

    Having a lime green charger pass you at 120 in a 40 is when you really question if living that close is a good idea.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @John Johnson

    That's why it's a good idea for Detroit suburbs to have an excellent police presence. This used to be very politically doable though I'm unsure about right now due to the stupid current Woke moral panic about BL(D)M.

    This is especially sad even for blacks themselves since BL(D)M has apparently been deadlier for blacks than even Jim Crow was, according to Steve Sailer's research. Early 20th century Southern white supremacists would be proud of BL(D)M for getting so many additional blacks killed, unfortunately.

    FWIW, there have been some blacks moving into the Detroit suburbs since 1990, especially right to the northwest of Detroit:

    https://www.bridgemi.com/sites/default/files/2021-07/detroit-apple-news-version-3-1.jpg

    But Detroit suburbs are still mostly white (and Asian), thankfully.

    While there are laws against racial discrimination in housing in the US nowadays, a lot of neighborhoods in the US even nowadays are still *mostly* segregated by race. As in, overwhelmingly of a single race. I suspect that black crime has a lot to do with this.

    FWIW, I don't see a problem with the current situation in regards to this. This doesn't involve *state-mandated* segregation or even racially restrictive covenants, after all.

    Replies: @John Johnson

  1035. @Ivashka the fool
    @S


    the Fall of Capitalism
     
    The polite way to talk about it is calling it the Great Reset.

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard

    Where do you think the omicron came from?

    • Agree: Ivashka the fool
    • Replies: @John Johnson
    @Emil Nikola Richard

    Where do you think the omicron came from?

    Most likely mice or rats because it mutated quickly from the original and has DNA snippets for non-humans.

    But do explain your theory as to why there was a conspiracy to make a less lethal mutation.

  1036. Sean says:
    @Mr. XYZ
    @Sean


    Apart from Russia which was explicitly told it could not join the EU, and found it there was an unspoken agreement it was not allowed to join NATO.
     
    When you're assassinating your critics, that's sort of what happens.

    Surely it is better to have the Russian veto formalized as belonging to an autonomous regions of Russian speaking Ukrainians in the constitutional arrangements of the country so it could live in peace than proceeding as if Russia would be forced to swallow it because it ethically ought to? It might have but it was barely possible in the real world.

     

    Should Serbia and Poland have capitulated to Austria-Hungary and Nazi Germany in 1914 and 1939, respectively, in an attempt to save lives?

    Replies: @Sean

    The Paris Charter was all well and good, but Russia did not realise if was going to be alone facing all countries it once held suzerainty over now in Nato and the EU. What should happen is a country’s concerns ought to be treated concomitantly with its capability and willingness to use force. The idea that the Paris Charter meant Russia would feel compelled to remain passive as Ukraine joined the rest of Eastern Europe in a military alliance Russia was excluded from was silly. George Kennan and others including the current head of the CIA when a diplomat in Moscow, predicted the Russians would end up deciding they had to fight.

    Unfortunately no one listened. In 2000 RusFed was seen as an economic and industrial joke with pretensions to global power projection that were bathetic, as evidenced by the loss of the Kursk. In that year Putin spoke of Russia, which had already been told it could never join the EU, joining Nato (naively, he was to be fobbed off). On 12 September 2001, Putin was the first leader to call George Bush – Putin pledged support and–very much against the wishes of his own military–gave US forces access to bases in Central Asia vital for the initial US campaign in Afghanistan.

    Shortly afterwards the US pressured Moldovia to pull out of a deal resolving the Transnistria frozen conflict. But no matter how weak Russia had become in global reach, it was still quite formidable close to its own borders, yet it was not treated as a force to be reckoned with. I do think Ukrainian politicians ought to have realised that the US was not going to get into a war with Russia over Ukraine, and so Ukraine ought to behave with an eye to Russia’s military option for dealing with Ukraine. Finland showed how that could be done successfully. Relying on American led NATO to intimidato Russia out of getting kinetic had not worked for Georgia in 2008, or Ukraine in 2014, so why on earth would anyone expect that Zelensky could make clear he was not compromising on Ukraine’s freedom of action (in return for the Donbass being given back to Ukraine), without unpleasant consequences. Was Ukraine under the misapprehension in the aftermath of Ukrainegate and it being the grounds for the impeachment of Trump that now Biden was President, Ukraine had some kind of security guarantee from a powerful protector, one RusFed would be intimidated by. This seems to be the case, what Mearsheimer has called Ukraine being led down the Primrose Path (to being wrecked).

  1037. LatW says:
    @Wokechoke
    @LatW

    About what exactly do Israelis disagree among themselves? Nothing of any substance. The Diaspora have not to my knowledge done or even advocated for sustained violence among themselves over any issue. Given that the Jews have been in perpetual war with their neighbors the conspicuous lack of violent dissidence is a hallmark of it not being truly democratic.


    The consensus among the jews is extraordinary, and they certainly do not permit this sort of cohesion among German, Brits, Americans etc who all all at each other's throats in their own political community (over extraordinarily trivial trifles). Through arms and proxy force like the US and UK the Israelis divide up their Arab neighbors into morsels and this pattern of unquestioned foreign policy support is never legally challenged among those democratic electorates.

    Replies: @LatW

    I didn’t mean now, but when Israel was still relatively weak. The kind of cohesion and mobilization of resources that they have achieved (as well as ability to tolerate risk and readiness to accept risk) typically can only be achieved via fascist methods. But they have still maintained a functioning Knesset and, not only that, they also have Arab representation. These kinds of things are normally not permitted when a country and a society is at a permanent state of war.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @LatW

    FWIW, Israeli Arabs lived under martial law until 1966.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

  1038. @John Johnson
    @Mr. XYZ

    I would presume that heavily white suburbs of Detroit such as Livonia are fairly nice. AFAIK, most Detroit suburbs are heavily white. The ones that aren’t are probably significantly less pleasant.

    Michigan has a lot of nice burbs. I've been to them. They are nicely kept and filled with guilt ridden Whites that fund Detroit.

    But even with nice burbs you run into the gas up problem.

    Detroit thugs don't take a vow to stay in the city. Even 30 minutes outside a ghetto you will see quite the characters at night.

    There is a lot of focus on the shootings but they tend to be concentrated unlike the general shenanigans that spillover into nearby areas.

    Having a lime green charger pass you at 120 in a 40 is when you really question if living that close is a good idea.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    That’s why it’s a good idea for Detroit suburbs to have an excellent police presence. This used to be very politically doable though I’m unsure about right now due to the stupid current Woke moral panic about BL(D)M.

    This is especially sad even for blacks themselves since BL(D)M has apparently been deadlier for blacks than even Jim Crow was, according to Steve Sailer’s research. Early 20th century Southern white supremacists would be proud of BL(D)M for getting so many additional blacks killed, unfortunately.

    FWIW, there have been some blacks moving into the Detroit suburbs since 1990, especially right to the northwest of Detroit:

    But Detroit suburbs are still mostly white (and Asian), thankfully.

    While there are laws against racial discrimination in housing in the US nowadays, a lot of neighborhoods in the US even nowadays are still *mostly* segregated by race. As in, overwhelmingly of a single race. I suspect that black crime has a lot to do with this.

    FWIW, I don’t see a problem with the current situation in regards to this. This doesn’t involve *state-mandated* segregation or even racially restrictive covenants, after all.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
    @Mr. XYZ

    That’s why it’s a good idea for Detroit suburbs to have an excellent police presence. This used to be very politically doable though I’m unsure about right now due to the stupid current Woke moral panic about BL(D)M.

    Even with a police presence they let Black youff steal cars and drive them over 100 mph.

    If they kill someone then it's juvy for 2-3 years. You were just in the wrong place at the wrong time. That's what they will write in the news.

    There are police all over Chicago. Doesn't mean a damn thing when there is no political will or jail space to lock up all the criminals.

    The police will not save you from the gassing up problem. You gas up 30 minutes from a ghetto and run into Dawntre having a bad day. Well now it is your bad day.

    But Detroit suburbs are still mostly white (and Asian), thankfully.

    They are actually more Arab than Asian.

    The Arabs are the new Jews of Detroit. It used to be that the Jews were the economic middlemen for Blacks but they were chased out in the Detroit riots. Coptic Christians were purposely moved into Detroit by the Feds. You can get a green card if you basically agree to open a business in a Black area. My wife knows someone that came to the US via this route. You show around 100k in capital and have to work in an "underserved" area of their choosing. That is why so many Arabs own liquor and cell phone stores in Detroit. They didn't move there by choice.

    FWIW, I don’t see a problem with the current situation in regards to this. This doesn’t involve *state-mandated* segregation or even racially restrictive covenants, after all.

    I guess but you still have the hollowing out problem. Blacks start migrating out of the city for services. They start going to grocery stores, restaurants and movie theaters in White burbs because said businesses don't like to open in Black areas.

    The result is a hollowed out urban core with abandoned housing. I'm open to solutions to this problem that include public investment. I certainly don't support the conservative view of the "Free market" somehow fixing this.

  1039. @LatW
    @Wokechoke

    I didn't mean now, but when Israel was still relatively weak. The kind of cohesion and mobilization of resources that they have achieved (as well as ability to tolerate risk and readiness to accept risk) typically can only be achieved via fascist methods. But they have still maintained a functioning Knesset and, not only that, they also have Arab representation. These kinds of things are normally not permitted when a country and a society is at a permanent state of war.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    FWIW, Israeli Arabs lived under martial law until 1966.

    • Thanks: LatW
    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @Mr. XYZ

    Here's an article about this:

    https://www.haaretz.com/jewish/2013-06-16/ty-article/november-8-1966-military-rule-on-israeli-arabs-lifted/0000017f-f7c9-d044-adff-f7f980760000

  1040. The uprising in France is great. Too bad we don’t have more working class Muslims in America who could do such a thing.

    I don’t believe this uprising can be disconnected from the rising cost of living that is devestating working people all over the world. People are struggling to afford basic necessities and it’s putting a tremendous amount of stress on the whole rotten, globalist system.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @Greasy William

    We could import more working-class Muslims, though I'd question the wisdom of that since it increases the risk of people getting murdered for "Islamophobic" speech. You'd need to massively amp up the racial and religious profiling to compensate for this, very possibly. Which is likely to piss off a whole lot of people. Which would be a shame if this kind of profiling actually saves lives.

    We have recently imported a sizable amount of Afghan refugees but they're a small drop in the bucket relative to the total US population. Are working-class Latin Americans not good enough for you? If so, do you want to try working-class Hindus and Sikhs? You'll get some working-class Muslims as well in such a scenario due to India's religious diversity.

    , @LatW
    @Greasy William


    Too bad we don’t have more working class Muslims in America who could do such a thing.
     
    In America, in most places they would not be able to get away with things they get away with in France, the American cops are more ruthless and less ceremonial than the French ones (although the French cops seem to be doing a somewhat decent job given what they have to put up with).

    I don’t believe this uprising can be disconnected from the rising cost of living that is devestating working people all over the world. People are struggling to afford basic necessities and it’s putting a tremendous amount of stress on the whole rotten, globalist system.
     
    The native Europeans of lesser means are also affected by the rise of cost of living, the native Europeas are also harassed and assaulted by African immigrants and sometimes murdered by them, yet they don't go around looting, burning their compatriots' vehicles and breaking windows. Arson is a very serious crime, there is absolutely no excuse for it. There is no police racism in France, the problem is that North Africans are often not well behaved. Everyone knows this, what is the point of pretending to not see it?

    Replies: @Greasy William, @Matra

  1041. @Mr. XYZ
    @YetAnotherAnon

    The interesting thing is that I myself actually supported Crimean and Donbass separatism between 2014 and 2022. But then when I realized that it simply set the stage for Russia attacking the rest of Ukraine in 2022, I became more hostile towards Crimean and Donbass separatism.

    Similar to how Hitler used his seizure of the Sudetenland in late 1938 as a prelude to his seizure of the rest of Czechia in early 1939, contrary to the principle of national self-determination.

    Replies: @Mikhail, @Wokechoke

    https://www.eurasiareview.com/26062023-post-mutiny-assessment-in-russia-oped/

    Excerpt –

    In comparison, no one prominent in Russia backed Prigozhin, who either became an agent of the neocons/neolibs, or a useful idiot for them. His comment that there was no legit basis to attack Ukraine is neocon/neolib is crock.

    The Kiev regime, France and Germany acknowledged they didn’t plan to have the Minsk Accords observed. Under that agreement, Donbass was to achieve autonomy within Ukraine’s Communist drawn boundary. For seven years after the Minsk signing, the Kiev regime was building up its forces with some open talk about doing an Operation Storm– the 1995 ethnic cleansing of at least 150,000 Krajina Serbs with hundreds of casualties in that process. Shortly before February 24, 2022 (the start of Russia’s special military operation), OSCE observers said there was a dramatic increase of Kiev regime shelling at rebel Donbass territory.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @Mikhail

    I'm unsure that an Operation Storm was ever actually official Ukrainian policy, but Yes, any Ukrainian attempt to implement such a move would have been an extremely bad-faith act. Hence, Russia would have been justified in moving in to annex the Donbass, had it not also invaded the rest of Ukraine in pursuit of its imperialist ambitions. However, since it did, Ukraine has every right to try recapturing the Donbass and even Crimea.

    Replies: @Mikhail, @LondonBob

  1042. @Mikhail
    @Mr. XYZ

    https://www.eurasiareview.com/26062023-post-mutiny-assessment-in-russia-oped/

    Excerpt -


    In comparison, no one prominent in Russia backed Prigozhin, who either became an agent of the neocons/neolibs, or a useful idiot for them. His comment that there was no legit basis to attack Ukraine is neocon/neolib is crock.

    The Kiev regime, France and Germany acknowledged they didn’t plan to have the Minsk Accords observed. Under that agreement, Donbass was to achieve autonomy within Ukraine’s Communist drawn boundary. For seven years after the Minsk signing, the Kiev regime was building up its forces with some open talk about doing an Operation Storm– the 1995 ethnic cleansing of at least 150,000 Krajina Serbs with hundreds of casualties in that process. Shortly before February 24, 2022 (the start of Russia’s special military operation), OSCE observers said there was a dramatic increase of Kiev regime shelling at rebel Donbass territory.
     

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    I’m unsure that an Operation Storm was ever actually official Ukrainian policy, but Yes, any Ukrainian attempt to implement such a move would have been an extremely bad-faith act. Hence, Russia would have been justified in moving in to annex the Donbass, had it not also invaded the rest of Ukraine in pursuit of its imperialist ambitions. However, since it did, Ukraine has every right to try recapturing the Donbass and even Crimea.

    • Disagree: Mikhail
    • Replies: @Mikhail
    @Mr. XYZ


    I’m unsure that an Operation Storm was ever actually official Ukrainian policy, but Yes, any Ukrainian attempt to implement such a move would have been an extremely bad-faith act. Hence, Russia would have been justified in moving in to annex the Donbass, had it not also invaded the rest of Ukraine in pursuit of its imperialist ambitions. However, since it did, Ukraine has every right to try recapturing the Donbass and even Crimea.
     
    As noted, the Kiev regime, France and Germany said that the Minsk Accords were on their part a charade to buy time. Russia waited seven years to give peace a chance. It proceeded to make an earnest attempt in March of 2022 unlike the Anglo-American neocons and neolibs.

    In the process of listening to this:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IkfxJgdMEmw
    , @LondonBob
    @Mr. XYZ

    Similarly the Russians have every right to return their former lands from Odessa to Kharkov, because of the actions of the post coup regime installed in Kiev. All is fair in love and war. That is the attitude for most of the world.

  1043. @Greasy William
    The uprising in France is great. Too bad we don't have more working class Muslims in America who could do such a thing.

    I don't believe this uprising can be disconnected from the rising cost of living that is devestating working people all over the world. People are struggling to afford basic necessities and it's putting a tremendous amount of stress on the whole rotten, globalist system.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @LatW

    We could import more working-class Muslims, though I’d question the wisdom of that since it increases the risk of people getting murdered for “Islamophobic” speech. You’d need to massively amp up the racial and religious profiling to compensate for this, very possibly. Which is likely to piss off a whole lot of people. Which would be a shame if this kind of profiling actually saves lives.

    We have recently imported a sizable amount of Afghan refugees but they’re a small drop in the bucket relative to the total US population. Are working-class Latin Americans not good enough for you? If so, do you want to try working-class Hindus and Sikhs? You’ll get some working-class Muslims as well in such a scenario due to India’s religious diversity.

  1044. @Mr. XYZ
    @Mikhail

    I'm unsure that an Operation Storm was ever actually official Ukrainian policy, but Yes, any Ukrainian attempt to implement such a move would have been an extremely bad-faith act. Hence, Russia would have been justified in moving in to annex the Donbass, had it not also invaded the rest of Ukraine in pursuit of its imperialist ambitions. However, since it did, Ukraine has every right to try recapturing the Donbass and even Crimea.

    Replies: @Mikhail, @LondonBob

    I’m unsure that an Operation Storm was ever actually official Ukrainian policy, but Yes, any Ukrainian attempt to implement such a move would have been an extremely bad-faith act. Hence, Russia would have been justified in moving in to annex the Donbass, had it not also invaded the rest of Ukraine in pursuit of its imperialist ambitions. However, since it did, Ukraine has every right to try recapturing the Donbass and even Crimea.

    As noted, the Kiev regime, France and Germany said that the Minsk Accords were on their part a charade to buy time. Russia waited seven years to give peace a chance. It proceeded to make an earnest attempt in March of 2022 unlike the Anglo-American neocons and neolibs.

    In the process of listening to this:

  1045. @Anatoly Karlin
    @Mr. Hack

    Thanks. Yes, and the offer still stands. I'm uninterested in decamping back to the US - it has some attractions as the Western imperial center, but price-to-quality ratio is horrendous for anyone who doesn't need to physically be there. I still like Russia from a purely price-to-benefits/culture perspective, with Moscow being my favorite city, so it will almost certainly remain my main "base" into the indefinite future. However, as I am again a derooted thing, digital nomadism makes a lot more sense for me.

    I no longer support triunism or any national mythologies or indeed nation-state. "Patriot" is close to "patsy" in the dictionary for a reason. EHC trends towards globalism and the collapse of borders.

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Beckow, @QCIC, @Mr. Hack, @Mr. XYZ, @PetrOldSack

    Thanks Karlin, your suggestions are noted. A nice way to redeem yourself after your Covid19 bout of stubborn-ness.

    Have nation-states compete for your assets as an individual. Separation of body and digital soul. Globalism of human assets is indeed a logical consequence of complex societies. Ill understood, you are quite a fore-runner here.

    Lots of hurdles, crowd sourcing becomes looking for needles in a hay-stack [only ideas with a certain gravity, little texture, static most, are catching on], egos clashing, what about agency cross territorial borders. Choices in mating and breeding into quality oriented produce. Collaboration beyond the digital realm [physical contexts that agency obliges].

    On the positive, prohibit a country to own you. Voting with your feet. …

    • Agree: Ivashka the fool
    • Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
    @PetrOldSack

    Curtis Yarvin has been promoting this for twenty years. He claims his mom is not a jew. There is a proverb.


    Jews do not have roots; they have legs.
     
    It is a workaround kluge and deep down inside most women hate it. My aunt did our family tree about ten years ago and she gave me thirty pages on my mom's family going back to the early 1800's. The thing that stuck out to me is nearly every female was accounted for birth to death and few of them ever moved. Half the males disappeared. Their life was one sentence.

    He moved to X to work. He went to war Y and was killed. He went to Z and was not heard from again.

    There were only a tiny fraction she got married to A and moved to X. I don't understand how they got spewed all over the United States and beyond but there is one direction the centrifugal force never goes. In my parents' generation they used to have a thing they called getting married and settling down. My parents did not do that.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

  1046. LatW says:
    @Greasy William
    The uprising in France is great. Too bad we don't have more working class Muslims in America who could do such a thing.

    I don't believe this uprising can be disconnected from the rising cost of living that is devestating working people all over the world. People are struggling to afford basic necessities and it's putting a tremendous amount of stress on the whole rotten, globalist system.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @LatW

    Too bad we don’t have more working class Muslims in America who could do such a thing.

    In America, in most places they would not be able to get away with things they get away with in France, the American cops are more ruthless and less ceremonial than the French ones (although the French cops seem to be doing a somewhat decent job given what they have to put up with).

    I don’t believe this uprising can be disconnected from the rising cost of living that is devestating working people all over the world. People are struggling to afford basic necessities and it’s putting a tremendous amount of stress on the whole rotten, globalist system.

    The native Europeans of lesser means are also affected by the rise of cost of living, the native Europeas are also harassed and assaulted by African immigrants and sometimes murdered by them, yet they don’t go around looting, burning their compatriots’ vehicles and breaking windows. Arson is a very serious crime, there is absolutely no excuse for it. There is no police racism in France, the problem is that North Africans are often not well behaved. Everyone knows this, what is the point of pretending to not see it?

    • Agree: S
    • Replies: @Greasy William
    @LatW

    The police enforced the Covid lockdowns. If an Algerian goes to rob or murder a Frenchman, the Frenchman is capable of defending himself. But that same Frenchman cannot defend himself from the police that will then come to arrest him.

    The police are gutter scum and anything that harms them is good. Once the police have been liquidated, it will be trivially easy to deal with both the immigrants and the liberals.

    Replies: @Sher Singh

    , @Matra
    @LatW

    In America, in most places they would not be able to get away with things they get away with in France, the American cops are more ruthless

    I guess you don't remember 2020 when thousands of buildings were burned down in a nationwide state organised uprising against Donald Trump. American police are pussies who love bullying law-abiding white people.

  1047. @Ivashka the fool
    @silviosilver

    I don't understand why you're angry with what I posted. I am simply describing what is the situation nowadays. If we should be angry with anyone, it would be with those who enabled the eroding of the European peoples and the atomization of their societies. Those are the culprits. Not me.

    And yes, I would wish to live in a World where anyone would stay more or less where one was born, me included. But we're way post that point nowadays. The effects of Globalization are probably irreversible.

    France is not and never be again the place I discovered decades ago. I saw it change and it was not a pleasant sight. I think it will go further and will be way more damaging still. But we have to remember that these kids' violence is a consequence. The cause is something else entirely.

    Replies: @A123, @silviosilver

    If we should be angry with anyone, it would be with those who enabled the eroding of the European peoples and the atomization of their societies.

    I was angry with you for attempting to justify it. (“They’re injecting youth into an aging society!” “They are fellow citizens!”)

    Still, it is only human to try to find something bearable about the conditions we live in, for the sake of our sanity, so that we can dwell on life’s more pleasant aspects rather than steel ourselves for a fight.

    Sadly, I cannot see that there are any silver linings to this shitshow.

    Demographically, if the point of no return has indeed been passed, it is still worth pursuing the least bad outcome, and this too requires looking squarely at reality rather than evading it with feelgood fictions.

    • Replies: @Yahya
    @silviosilver


    Demographically, if the point of no return has indeed been passed, it is still worth pursuing the least bad outcome, and this too requires looking squarely at reality rather than evading it with feelgood fictions.
     
    According to Pew, the Muslim population in Western Europe is projected to be around 10-20% by 2050 depending on migration scenarios; with the working age population being around 40% Muslim.

    https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2017/11/29/europes-growing-muslim-population/

    If the Islamic demographic continues to grow, there will probably be an emergence of an Islamo-European civilization which would resemble Bosnia or modern Turkey somewhat viz. a strong secular elite culture mixed with working-class Islamism. Historically these fusionistic culture have existed within the Islamic world, but eventually they fizzle as the faithful Muslim population asserts itself and reduces the non-Muslim population to dhimmitude. A wave of conversion follows as non-Muslims are subjected to financial and social pressures; ultimately leading to an exclusivist Islamic society. This might be the fate in store for Europe, if they don’t nip things in the bud while they can.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @silviosilver

    , @Ivashka the fool
    @silviosilver

    Have I ever written that there is anything positive about this situation?

    No, I have written: sad for all those involved.

    Now, what would be practical, realistic and ethically sound to do in such a situation?

    Pressure to change attitudes, have a heavy punishment for the deviants, educate and reward those who adopt the needed behavior. A clear set of rules should be enunciated and uniformly applied to the whole of the French society. It should be universal. There should be no exceptions.

    Would it be done ?

    No. Because there is an important fraction of French society that would not accept a rigid meritocracy. And it is not les jeunes des banlieues, but the likes of Bernard Henri Lévy. They punch well above their weight in the postmodern degenerate France. They are the new aristocracy of the rotten French society, they are above the law and regulations. And they need the underclass of immigrant descent to weaken the native middle class and to keep it distracted. Divide and rule. Nothing new. Same as in US of A with the Afro-American thugs. Who had popularized Gangster Rap in US of A ?

    https://www.nationalreview.com/media-blog/blame-david-geffen-greg-pollowitz/

    Who popularized the violent Rap de banlieue in France ?

    https://dai.ly/xcp29h

    Who owned Canal + back then ?

    https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/seagram-dynasty-down-the-hatch/article4165136/

    It takes time to plant the seeds and see them grow. A multi generation endeavor.

    And yeah, one should always look into the flows on moneys, a simple question: where does the drug moneys from the US Afro-American and British massive hoods, as well as French banlieues end up ?

    The solution is not to eradicate migrants, but to inactivate those who enable migration, crime and social decay. The solution is a totalitarian rigidly moral meritocracy. But it would entail the demise of Capitalism and its replacement with something entirely different.

    Replies: @sudden death, @Anatoly Karlin, @silviosilver

  1048. @silviosilver
    @Ivashka the fool


    If we should be angry with anyone, it would be with those who enabled the eroding of the European peoples and the atomization of their societies.
     
    I was angry with you for attempting to justify it. ("They're injecting youth into an aging society!" "They are fellow citizens!")

    Still, it is only human to try to find something bearable about the conditions we live in, for the sake of our sanity, so that we can dwell on life's more pleasant aspects rather than steel ourselves for a fight.

    Sadly, I cannot see that there are any silver linings to this shitshow.

    Demographically, if the point of no return has indeed been passed, it is still worth pursuing the least bad outcome, and this too requires looking squarely at reality rather than evading it with feelgood fictions.

    Replies: @Yahya, @Ivashka the fool

    Demographically, if the point of no return has indeed been passed, it is still worth pursuing the least bad outcome, and this too requires looking squarely at reality rather than evading it with feelgood fictions.

    According to Pew, the Muslim population in Western Europe is projected to be around 10-20% by 2050 depending on migration scenarios; with the working age population being around 40% Muslim.

    https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2017/11/29/europes-growing-muslim-population/

    If the Islamic demographic continues to grow, there will probably be an emergence of an Islamo-European civilization which would resemble Bosnia or modern Turkey somewhat viz. a strong secular elite culture mixed with working-class Islamism. Historically these fusionistic culture have existed within the Islamic world, but eventually they fizzle as the faithful Muslim population asserts itself and reduces the non-Muslim population to dhimmitude. A wave of conversion follows as non-Muslims are subjected to financial and social pressures; ultimately leading to an exclusivist Islamic society. This might be the fate in store for Europe, if they don’t nip things in the bud while they can.

    • Agree: Ivashka the fool
    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @Yahya

    Funny how most people don't understand this. It's because they have a twister idea of the historical Islamic conquests and the genesis of the Islamic civilization. The Maghreb was still massively Christian 300 years after the conquest, its Jewish communities were quite alive when the French entered the scene, that was more than a thousand years later. Compare with Al Andalous where Jews and Muslims were expelled by the Catholic Kings. Islam has all the time in the World. Demography is destiny. And no, the French won't do anything. The likes of Jacques Attali would prevent them from doing whatever needs to be done. They need a source of permanent tension to apply it against les Français de souche middle class. And they have fond memories of Al Andalous anyway.

    https://www.babelio.com/livres/Attali-La-Confrerie-des-Eveilles/21310

    They know that without Islam, their ancestors would have been put to the knife.

    🙂

    Replies: @Yahya

    , @silviosilver
    @Yahya


    . Historically these fusionistic culture have existed within the Islamic world, but eventually they fizzle as the faithful Muslim population asserts itself and reduces the non-Muslim population to dhimmitude.
     
    There's a limit to how informative the historical trend is though. Those examples occurred back when religion was taken a lot more seriously, more literally, more unquestioningly; at a time when religion was regarded simply as "reality." Today, Islamists struggle to impose their values even on historically Islamic societies (many of which technically were historically Christian, but eh, no need to take everything back to Adam and Eve). It's far from a foregone conclusion that the same would eventually occur in societies in which liberal and rational values are so deeply embedded. (Of course, I'd much rather take the measures today which would obviate ever having to have to find out. Unfortunately, plenty of important people disagree.)

    This might be the fate in store for Europe, if they don’t nip things in the bud while they can.
     
    The nip it in the bud stage was fifty years ago. This is more like the "oh shit, I don't think this is going to work out well at all" stage.
  1049. @Mr. XYZ
    @Mikhail

    I'm unsure that an Operation Storm was ever actually official Ukrainian policy, but Yes, any Ukrainian attempt to implement such a move would have been an extremely bad-faith act. Hence, Russia would have been justified in moving in to annex the Donbass, had it not also invaded the rest of Ukraine in pursuit of its imperialist ambitions. However, since it did, Ukraine has every right to try recapturing the Donbass and even Crimea.

    Replies: @Mikhail, @LondonBob

    Similarly the Russians have every right to return their former lands from Odessa to Kharkov, because of the actions of the post coup regime installed in Kiev. All is fair in love and war. That is the attitude for most of the world.

  1050. @Mr. XYZ
    @YetAnotherAnon

    The interesting thing is that I myself actually supported Crimean and Donbass separatism between 2014 and 2022. But then when I realized that it simply set the stage for Russia attacking the rest of Ukraine in 2022, I became more hostile towards Crimean and Donbass separatism.

    Similar to how Hitler used his seizure of the Sudetenland in late 1938 as a prelude to his seizure of the rest of Czechia in early 1939, contrary to the principle of national self-determination.

    Replies: @Mikhail, @Wokechoke

    Slovaks got them or own state though. And historical land was given back to Poland in that event.

    Also, the real issue was that Hitler seized the Skoda works and suddenly added 350 Pz38 to his tank inventory at a stroke.

    The Tigers were later in the war built at Skoda.

  1051. @LatW
    @Greasy William


    Too bad we don’t have more working class Muslims in America who could do such a thing.
     
    In America, in most places they would not be able to get away with things they get away with in France, the American cops are more ruthless and less ceremonial than the French ones (although the French cops seem to be doing a somewhat decent job given what they have to put up with).

    I don’t believe this uprising can be disconnected from the rising cost of living that is devestating working people all over the world. People are struggling to afford basic necessities and it’s putting a tremendous amount of stress on the whole rotten, globalist system.
     
    The native Europeans of lesser means are also affected by the rise of cost of living, the native Europeas are also harassed and assaulted by African immigrants and sometimes murdered by them, yet they don't go around looting, burning their compatriots' vehicles and breaking windows. Arson is a very serious crime, there is absolutely no excuse for it. There is no police racism in France, the problem is that North Africans are often not well behaved. Everyone knows this, what is the point of pretending to not see it?

    Replies: @Greasy William, @Matra

    The police enforced the Covid lockdowns. If an Algerian goes to rob or murder a Frenchman, the Frenchman is capable of defending himself. But that same Frenchman cannot defend himself from the police that will then come to arrest him.

    The police are gutter scum and anything that harms them is good. Once the police have been liquidated, it will be trivially easy to deal with both the immigrants and the liberals.

    • Replies: @Sher Singh
    @Greasy William

    https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/chandigarh/nihangs-cut-off-hand-of-policeman-after-scuffle-in-vegetable-market/articleshow/75104243.cms

    Basically this.

  1052. @Yahya
    @silviosilver


    Demographically, if the point of no return has indeed been passed, it is still worth pursuing the least bad outcome, and this too requires looking squarely at reality rather than evading it with feelgood fictions.
     
    According to Pew, the Muslim population in Western Europe is projected to be around 10-20% by 2050 depending on migration scenarios; with the working age population being around 40% Muslim.

    https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2017/11/29/europes-growing-muslim-population/

    If the Islamic demographic continues to grow, there will probably be an emergence of an Islamo-European civilization which would resemble Bosnia or modern Turkey somewhat viz. a strong secular elite culture mixed with working-class Islamism. Historically these fusionistic culture have existed within the Islamic world, but eventually they fizzle as the faithful Muslim population asserts itself and reduces the non-Muslim population to dhimmitude. A wave of conversion follows as non-Muslims are subjected to financial and social pressures; ultimately leading to an exclusivist Islamic society. This might be the fate in store for Europe, if they don’t nip things in the bud while they can.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @silviosilver

    Funny how most people don’t understand this. It’s because they have a twister idea of the historical Islamic conquests and the genesis of the Islamic civilization. The Maghreb was still massively Christian 300 years after the conquest, its Jewish communities were quite alive when the French entered the scene, that was more than a thousand years later. Compare with Al Andalous where Jews and Muslims were expelled by the Catholic Kings. Islam has all the time in the World. Demography is destiny. And no, the French won’t do anything. The likes of Jacques Attali would prevent them from doing whatever needs to be done. They need a source of permanent tension to apply it against les Français de souche middle class. And they have fond memories of Al Andalous anyway.

    https://www.babelio.com/livres/Attali-La-Confrerie-des-Eveilles/21310

    They know that without Islam, their ancestors would have been put to the knife.

    🙂

    • Agree: Yahya
    • Replies: @Yahya
    @Ivashka the fool


    The likes of Jacques Attali would prevent them from doing whatever needs to be done.
     
    The French people don't realize how small a window they have to rescue themselves from cultural and demographic oblivion. They probably think "oh well, the Muslims are only 10% of the population; and the disturbances are relegated to the suburbs which no-one else bothers going to anyway". But few of them have probably looked into demographic projections. If they did, they would know that Muslims would comprise 50% of the working age population somewhere around the 2070 mark. By that time it would pretty much over for traditional French civilization. Pensioners are old, exhausted and functionally useless. The future belongs to da yoofs, and there aren't many ethnic Frenchmen who can be imported from elsewhere.

    The situation can be still be salvaged; but a modicum of foresight and ethnocentrism seems to be too heavy a lift for modern Westerners. The future of Western Europe will therefore be determined by Islam or AI. It is a race between Bedouins and the Machine.

    Replies: @Greasy William

  1053. @Greasy William
    @LatW

    The police enforced the Covid lockdowns. If an Algerian goes to rob or murder a Frenchman, the Frenchman is capable of defending himself. But that same Frenchman cannot defend himself from the police that will then come to arrest him.

    The police are gutter scum and anything that harms them is good. Once the police have been liquidated, it will be trivially easy to deal with both the immigrants and the liberals.

    Replies: @Sher Singh

  1054. @silviosilver
    @Ivashka the fool


    If we should be angry with anyone, it would be with those who enabled the eroding of the European peoples and the atomization of their societies.
     
    I was angry with you for attempting to justify it. ("They're injecting youth into an aging society!" "They are fellow citizens!")

    Still, it is only human to try to find something bearable about the conditions we live in, for the sake of our sanity, so that we can dwell on life's more pleasant aspects rather than steel ourselves for a fight.

    Sadly, I cannot see that there are any silver linings to this shitshow.

    Demographically, if the point of no return has indeed been passed, it is still worth pursuing the least bad outcome, and this too requires looking squarely at reality rather than evading it with feelgood fictions.

    Replies: @Yahya, @Ivashka the fool

    Have I ever written that there is anything positive about this situation?

    No, I have written: sad for all those involved.

    Now, what would be practical, realistic and ethically sound to do in such a situation?

    Pressure to change attitudes, have a heavy punishment for the deviants, educate and reward those who adopt the needed behavior. A clear set of rules should be enunciated and uniformly applied to the whole of the French society. It should be universal. There should be no exceptions.

    Would it be done ?

    No. Because there is an important fraction of French society that would not accept a rigid meritocracy. And it is not les jeunes des banlieues, but the likes of Bernard Henri Lévy. They punch well above their weight in the postmodern degenerate France. They are the new aristocracy of the rotten French society, they are above the law and regulations. And they need the underclass of immigrant descent to weaken the native middle class and to keep it distracted. Divide and rule. Nothing new. Same as in US of A with the Afro-American thugs. Who had popularized Gangster Rap in US of A ?

    https://www.nationalreview.com/media-blog/blame-david-geffen-greg-pollowitz/

    Who popularized the violent Rap de banlieue in France ?

    Who owned Canal + back then ?

    https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/seagram-dynasty-down-the-hatch/article4165136/

    It takes time to plant the seeds and see them grow. A multi generation endeavor.

    And yeah, one should always look into the flows on moneys, a simple question: where does the drug moneys from the US Afro-American and British massive hoods, as well as French banlieues end up ?

    The solution is not to eradicate migrants, but to inactivate those who enable migration, crime and social decay. The solution is a totalitarian rigidly moral meritocracy. But it would entail the demise of Capitalism and its replacement with something entirely different.

    • Replies: @sudden death
    @Ivashka the fool

    Specific problem with France which lessens the overall impressions might be the fact its youth was always prone to rioting, especially lefties, even when nearly everybody still was white and nominally christian.

    Maybe I'm mistaken, but vaguely remember you mentioning living in France, so how it is at the ground level during the riots? It seems private ordinary everyday housing in general is not being touched massively yet?

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

    , @Anatoly Karlin
    @Ivashka the fool

    I support and endorse the French protesters.

    They are of course lumpenprole scum, with negligible revolutionary potential, but insofar as they undermine the authority of the centralized traditional French state, they constitute a progressive historical force in the march towards network states.

    Replies: @QCIC, @Ivashka the fool

    , @silviosilver
    @Ivashka the fool


    Have I ever written that there is anything positive about this situation?
     
    Well yes, you in fact just did. You said at least immigrants were injecting youth into an aging society. That is an attempt to see the situation in a more positive light.

    Now, what would be practical, realistic and ethically sound to do in such a situation?
     
    Ethical would be to racially and culturally live on, rather than resign yourself to racially and culturally dying out.

    If practicality and realism are not pursued with that end in mind, they are altogether pointless - indeed, unethical.

    If you do view that end as immoral, I think it would simplify this discussion if you were to just admit you don't really wish to see the racial status quo fundamentally altered. (That is the real function of softeners like "practical, realistic and ethically sound," I suspect.) And if the reason you consider it immoral is the upheaval and turmoil it would cause, I'd understand perfectly. I would disagree, but I wouldn't consider you evil or deliberately destructive. But, sorry, I would consider you irresponsible. I would remind you that your descendants, many generations down the line, would find fault with your stated "bloodlines" values and your refusal to countenance decisive action - not to undertake it, merely to countenance it - when there was still some small chance those values could prevail.

    The solution is not to eradicate migrants, but to inactivate those who enable migration, crime and social decay.
     
    Actually, that really would be a solution. It would actually solve the problem. It would solve the problem of being racially and culturally overwhelmed by racially and culturally hostile aliens. It would remove the need to hope for the best and to tell yourself pretty lies. (Note: if we take "eradicate" to mean to uproot, to remove, rather than to physically destroy the people, which would be excessive, unnecessary, and immoral - after all, this world is big enough for all of us.) The fact that this would in no way whatsoever be simple or likely to occur, or that for it to occur would require a monumental transvaluation of values, of which only the faintest traces are at present evident, belongs squarely in the "no shit, Sherlock" department.

    The rest of your comment relates to the values and decision making of the ruling elite. For God's sakes man, must the same talking points be rehearsed every time the immigration issue is discussed? Who the hell doesn't understand that western elites have foisted this mess on western peoples, and for reasons that suit their immediate interests as well as their vision for a more peaceful, productive world - one which, in particular, allows us to avoid the horrors of the 20th century? (That is, they aim to do good at the same time as doing well, and if not the former then at least always the latter. It's a can't lose proposition, precisely the gravy train that sellout Karlin wishes he was on.) I think on a blog like this it should simply be taken for granted that one's interlocutors possess this basic understanding, unless and until obvious evidence emerges that they don't. That would save everybody a lot of unnecessary keystrokes.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

  1055. @Ivashka the fool
    @silviosilver

    Have I ever written that there is anything positive about this situation?

    No, I have written: sad for all those involved.

    Now, what would be practical, realistic and ethically sound to do in such a situation?

    Pressure to change attitudes, have a heavy punishment for the deviants, educate and reward those who adopt the needed behavior. A clear set of rules should be enunciated and uniformly applied to the whole of the French society. It should be universal. There should be no exceptions.

    Would it be done ?

    No. Because there is an important fraction of French society that would not accept a rigid meritocracy. And it is not les jeunes des banlieues, but the likes of Bernard Henri Lévy. They punch well above their weight in the postmodern degenerate France. They are the new aristocracy of the rotten French society, they are above the law and regulations. And they need the underclass of immigrant descent to weaken the native middle class and to keep it distracted. Divide and rule. Nothing new. Same as in US of A with the Afro-American thugs. Who had popularized Gangster Rap in US of A ?

    https://www.nationalreview.com/media-blog/blame-david-geffen-greg-pollowitz/

    Who popularized the violent Rap de banlieue in France ?

    https://dai.ly/xcp29h

    Who owned Canal + back then ?

    https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/seagram-dynasty-down-the-hatch/article4165136/

    It takes time to plant the seeds and see them grow. A multi generation endeavor.

    And yeah, one should always look into the flows on moneys, a simple question: where does the drug moneys from the US Afro-American and British massive hoods, as well as French banlieues end up ?

    The solution is not to eradicate migrants, but to inactivate those who enable migration, crime and social decay. The solution is a totalitarian rigidly moral meritocracy. But it would entail the demise of Capitalism and its replacement with something entirely different.

    Replies: @sudden death, @Anatoly Karlin, @silviosilver

    Specific problem with France which lessens the overall impressions might be the fact its youth was always prone to rioting, especially lefties, even when nearly everybody still was white and nominally christian.

    Maybe I’m mistaken, but vaguely remember you mentioning living in France, so how it is at the ground level during the riots? It seems private ordinary everyday housing in general is not being touched massively yet?

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @sudden death

    I have left France behind many years ago, as soon as I understood towards what it is headed. The last few years confirmed my worst expectations. My friends there keep telling me how it is changing for the worse, I still have family members there and they are also complaining. Where I currently live, I see thousands of French immigrants of higher middle class pouring in to leave behind the French morass. I am pretty certain unfortunately that in the medium / long term France is a basket case.

    Was talking about it with my sons yesterday, the elder was sad about it, but didn't contradict me. The younger laughed about it, he is studying in English and is firmly aimed at a global work market. He basically told me jokingly that as long as Westerners wouldn't go full Fasch, they will keep on losing ground to the Asians. In his elite college, half of the kids are wealthy immigrants from India and China, the local native middle class is a tiny minority of the students. He listens to what I say and keeps eyes open, he understands what is going on.

    The West has rotten because it got infected with a deadly virus that erased its cultural, spiritual and economic immunity. For a while the West still looked strong, just like an old tree still looks majestic although it is rotten inside. France is an extreme case, but the rest of the Globalized West is following in its footsteps. And no, there would be no relief until it crumbles. We will both be dead by then, but the coming generations will live in a World where the Western influence would be severely curtailed.

    The only unknown is the technology evolving towards sentience. Perhaps all we are discussing right now will look puny and irrelevant in a couple of decades because we probably already got our feet into the Singularity trap.

    But that won't help les Français de souche. They shouldn't have listened to the masonic demagoguery way back in 1780-ies. They would be the largest power today and we would be writing in French on this forum. But there is no way to repair what they did and what they are still proud of today. It all started back then...

    Replies: @S

  1056. @Ivashka the fool
    @Yahya

    Funny how most people don't understand this. It's because they have a twister idea of the historical Islamic conquests and the genesis of the Islamic civilization. The Maghreb was still massively Christian 300 years after the conquest, its Jewish communities were quite alive when the French entered the scene, that was more than a thousand years later. Compare with Al Andalous where Jews and Muslims were expelled by the Catholic Kings. Islam has all the time in the World. Demography is destiny. And no, the French won't do anything. The likes of Jacques Attali would prevent them from doing whatever needs to be done. They need a source of permanent tension to apply it against les Français de souche middle class. And they have fond memories of Al Andalous anyway.

    https://www.babelio.com/livres/Attali-La-Confrerie-des-Eveilles/21310

    They know that without Islam, their ancestors would have been put to the knife.

    🙂

    Replies: @Yahya

    The likes of Jacques Attali would prevent them from doing whatever needs to be done.

    The French people don’t realize how small a window they have to rescue themselves from cultural and demographic oblivion. They probably think “oh well, the Muslims are only 10% of the population; and the disturbances are relegated to the suburbs which no-one else bothers going to anyway”. But few of them have probably looked into demographic projections. If they did, they would know that Muslims would comprise 50% of the working age population somewhere around the 2070 mark. By that time it would pretty much over for traditional French civilization. Pensioners are old, exhausted and functionally useless. The future belongs to da yoofs, and there aren’t many ethnic Frenchmen who can be imported from elsewhere.

    The situation can be still be salvaged; but a modicum of foresight and ethnocentrism seems to be too heavy a lift for modern Westerners. The future of Western Europe will therefore be determined by Islam or AI. It is a race between Bedouins and the Machine.

    • Agree: Ivashka the fool
    • Replies: @Greasy William
    @Yahya


    The situation can be still be salvaged; but a modicum of foresight and ethnocentrism seems to be too heavy a lift for modern Westerners.
     
    They subconsciously understand that their civilization isn't worth saving
  1057. @sudden death
    @Ivashka the fool

    Specific problem with France which lessens the overall impressions might be the fact its youth was always prone to rioting, especially lefties, even when nearly everybody still was white and nominally christian.

    Maybe I'm mistaken, but vaguely remember you mentioning living in France, so how it is at the ground level during the riots? It seems private ordinary everyday housing in general is not being touched massively yet?

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

    I have left France behind many years ago, as soon as I understood towards what it is headed. The last few years confirmed my worst expectations. My friends there keep telling me how it is changing for the worse, I still have family members there and they are also complaining. Where I currently live, I see thousands of French immigrants of higher middle class pouring in to leave behind the French morass. I am pretty certain unfortunately that in the medium / long term France is a basket case.

    Was talking about it with my sons yesterday, the elder was sad about it, but didn’t contradict me. The younger laughed about it, he is studying in English and is firmly aimed at a global work market. He basically told me jokingly that as long as Westerners wouldn’t go full Fasch, they will keep on losing ground to the Asians. In his elite college, half of the kids are wealthy immigrants from India and China, the local native middle class is a tiny minority of the students. He listens to what I say and keeps eyes open, he understands what is going on.

    The West has rotten because it got infected with a deadly virus that erased its cultural, spiritual and economic immunity. For a while the West still looked strong, just like an old tree still looks majestic although it is rotten inside. France is an extreme case, but the rest of the Globalized West is following in its footsteps. And no, there would be no relief until it crumbles. We will both be dead by then, but the coming generations will live in a World where the Western influence would be severely curtailed.

    The only unknown is the technology evolving towards sentience. Perhaps all we are discussing right now will look puny and irrelevant in a couple of decades because we probably already got our feet into the Singularity trap.

    But that won’t help les Français de souche. They shouldn’t have listened to the masonic demagoguery way back in 1780-ies. They would be the largest power today and we would be writing in French on this forum. But there is no way to repair what they did and what they are still proud of today. It all started back then…

    • Replies: @S
    @Ivashka the fool


    And they need the underclass of immigrant descent to weaken the native middle class and to keep it distracted. Divide and rule...And yeah, one should always look into the flows on moneys, a simple question: where does the drug moneys from the US Afro-American and British massive hoods, as well as French banlieues end up?
     
    Yes, divide and rule, most certainly.

    In regards to drugs, I sometimes have wondered if the ulterior motive for flooding China with opium during the 19th century was to reduce it's hundreds of millions population to such an unnaturally low state of being that at some point they could then be successfully preyed upon enmasse as a near 'bottomless' source of wage slaves (ie 'cheap labor') for importation into the Anglosphere.

    The elites and hangers on involved in such an endeavor would have been the very same amoral, brutal, and ruthless types whom had previously been involved in chattel slavery and it's trade, so certainly not something beyond them.

    Big money in drug sales, no doubt, but perhaps bigger money in wage slavery.

    The imported by diktat Chinese wage slaves (ie so called 'cheap labor') in the United States during the 1850s, 60's, and 70s, were often being paid only about a third of whatever everyone else was for the very same labor.

    Anyhow, for the self proclaimed 'progressives', the 'immigrant' has long been a primary source of both their wealth and political power.

    https://www.academia.edu/27219183/Between_urban_and_national_Political_mobilization_among_Mizrahim_in_Israel_s_development_towns_

    ‘…the immigrants usually serve three main functions: cheap labor to replace native groups; settlement on the ‘frontier’ (periphery); and control over the natives and their land. These dynamics generally result in the maintenance of hegemony…’


    'To advance the project of territorial ethnicization, the immigrants usually serve three main functions: cheap labor to replace native groups; settlement on the ‘frontier’ (periphery); and control over the natives and their land. These dynamics generally result in the maintenance of hegemony…Meanwhile, the immigrants are contributing to the important national project of settlement, which provides them with a sense of belonging and certain material gains from the settling state…while the natives find themselves entirely excluded.'
     
  1058. AP says:
    @Ivashka the fool
    @AP


    The humane solution would have been to give them their own homeland in Oran.
     
    Well, yes there were talks of l'Oranie being excluded from the independence deal. But one should remember that De Gaule wanted to disentangle France from the Maghreb entirely. He did that because being the very intelligent man that he was, he understood that keeping ten million Algerians as French citizens would be impossible for the French state. Remember that they were citizens at the time, Algeria was not a colony, but un département de la République. Today Algerians number around 40 million people, of which some 5 millions live in France. Imagine if France had to manage 40 millions of Algerians. Algerians would probably reach population parity with France in this generation or the next. De Gaule was right, a separation was absolutely required.

    Unfortunately, a complete severing of the ties proved impossible, not in the least because De Gaule has been chased from power 6 years after the Algerian independence by the Globalist chienlit (to use De Gaule's expression about the May 1968 protests). Those who came after De Gaule, had the Globalist financial circles interests close to their heart and started a mass migration process.

    Where De Gaule wanted an independent, strong and stable France, those who came after him, both left and right, were more or less Globalist and Atlanticist. Of which Macron (a former Rothschild employee) is a typical example.


    Maybe in Algeria, send them there with all their assets, they must have something.
     
    Algerians back home despise these types. And they are not just Algerians, there are many sub-Saharan Africans and other Maghrebis. These poor souls are really stuck in the middle. They've become the "classless elements", the lumpen proletaria. Hence their violence.

    The pessimism of someone without Faith. Who knows? This might inspire an awakening.

     

    The only true Awakening is Awakening of faith in Mahayana.

    🙂

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Awakening_of_Faith_in_the_Mahayana


    Austria-Hungary was a traditionalist state. It’s diversity was pre-nationalist, not post-nationalist.
     
    That might explain why Kalergi and Otto Von Habsburg worked to undermine European nation states. After all, an aristocracy is always somewhat cosmopolitan. The social function is more important than the ethnicity of the aristocrat. And the aristocracy primary competitors always were the middle class bourgeois which are the carriers of the national spirit. No wonder that after the fall of the Empire, these Austro-Hungarian aristocrats did all they could to weaken the European nations' middle class, including by promoting the Jewish preeminence, immigration and misgenation.

    Had the correct side won World War I, we would not have such a mess.

     

    There shouldn't have been a WWI, it was a catastrophe that started the Europe's unraveling, to much Anglo-American and Jewish applause...

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Mr. XYZ, @AP

    And the aristocracy primary competitors always were the middle class bourgeois which are the carriers of the national spirit.

    No. The carriers of the national spirit were the peasantry. The middle class bourgeoisie were the carriers of nationalism.

    There is a difference.

    The bourgeoisie were the enemies of both the peasants and of the aristocracy. They in part cannibalized the spirit of the former as part of their method of brainwashing and organising the masses for the purpose of seizing power from the latter. This was done through mass literacy. The result is that the bourgeoisie took over their nations and then the nations engaged in mutual mass slaughter. Celine very eloquently described this process.

    But in the early stages, in the Vendee, it was bourgeoisie head-choppers/mass killer versus both aristocrats and peasants.

    A nuance in Eastern Europe was that there wasn’t much of a bourgeoisie, so this role was often played by petty gentry. So in Polish Austria the nobles who had become nationalists rebelled against the Hapsburgs. The peasants hadn’t yet become literate however, so they defended the Emperor and slaughtered the rebels.

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @AP

    There is a contradiction in what you wrote. On one hand you correctly wrote that the Austro-Hungarian (and Russian) Empire(s) were pre-national, but on the other hand, you write that peasantry was the carriers of the national spirit. If they weren't a nation, how could they carry a nation's spirit?

    In fact, there was no national spirit among the peasant, as well as there was no national spirit among the higher aristocracy. The nation idea is a middle class trope. The middle class corresponding to lower income and rank nobility and la bourgeoisie.

    Once these social strata got prevalent and influential enough, they transformed the folkish spirit of the peasants to make them into a nation. That's the main reason it didn't happen in RusFed, the RusFed-ian elites and an important part of the middle class are antinational Noviop and the Russian Empire bourgeoisie on top of being somewhat of mixed origin, was not influential and not patriotic enough (with the exception of the Old Believer merchant dynasties).

    Anyway, going back to Kalergi, he and his circle were anti-national and they put the West on the path to nation-destruction with the help of Atlanticist networks and Jewish capital. Those are the ones to blame, they and their Anglo-Saxon enablers and cultural Marxist fellow travelers.

    https://blackcentraleurope.files.wordpress.com/2021/08/1944-kultur-terror.jpeg

    https://archives.eui.eu/en/fonds/181675?item=PAN%2FEU-23

    Either you have Atlanticist United Europe or an Europe of autonomous and independent nations. One excludes the other.

    Replies: @AP

    , @Mr. Hack
    @AP


    The peasants hadn’t yet become literate however, so they defended the Emperor and slaughtered the rebels.
     
    In Austrian Ukraine, I don't think that this model holds up. Peasants banded together in the 18th & 19th centuries (opryshki) and rebelled against most anybody with any status at all. In fact, the Austrian center had to send in gendarmes to calm the roving bands of brigands. Folk heroes like Oleksa Dovbush, Vasyl Baiurak, and Ivan Boichuk made their mark in Ukrainian history during this period.
    , @Coconuts
    @AP

    I've seen that there has been some new discussion around the idea of 'Aristo-Populism' in the conservative/post-liberal press, after Patrick Deneen just published 'Regime Change', the sequel to his earlier book 'Why Liberalism Failed'. His ideas are supposed to be inspired by the old medieval 'mixed constitution' model of Aquinas and other scholastic political writers, but updated for a modern context.

    A model like this might be interesting in the future if the predictions about middle class liberal fertility prove correct, and the future population turns out to be more made up of the children of lower educational level and conservative and/or religious higher level people.

    Some ideas like this used to exist in French other European countries' politics, the alliance of 'warriors and producers' against merchants and traders and it produced some unusual variants of anti-bourgeois socialism that were more favourable to the old aristocracy.

    Another idea from the broad Integralist tradition was that nations like France and Spain were the creation of monarchy and depended on it for their survival. The monarchy was understood as the unitary source of independent sovereignty that could 'organise' the other component parts of the nation and prevent them falling into conflict with each other, or factional conflict within them.

    It seems De Gaulle was influenced by this tradition when he designed the Vth Republic constitution and it's one reason why the French presidency is powerful, even if by now it is a more watered down version of what he intended.

    , @Mr. XYZ
    @AP


    The result is that the bourgeoisie took over their nations and then the nations engaged in mutual mass slaughter.
     
    Pre-national countries were just as happy to engage in this slaughter as national countries, so what exactly is this supposed to prove?

    Replies: @AP

  1059. A123 says: • Website

    There are occasional pieces of good news from the entertainment industry.

    Gal Gadot mocks the idea of a gender swapped James Bond.

    PEACE 😇
    __________

    P.S. I posted to the tech support channel that OT222 is slowing.

    https://www.unz.com/announcement/bugs-suggestions-2/?showcomments#comment-6037606

    If you are having issues, please chime in there.

  1060. @PetrOldSack
    @Anatoly Karlin

    Thanks Karlin, your suggestions are noted. A nice way to redeem yourself after your Covid19 bout of stubborn-ness.

    Have nation-states compete for your assets as an individual. Separation of body and digital soul. Globalism of human assets is indeed a logical consequence of complex societies. Ill understood, you are quite a fore-runner here.

    Lots of hurdles, crowd sourcing becomes looking for needles in a hay-stack [only ideas with a certain gravity, little texture, static most, are catching on], egos clashing, what about agency cross territorial borders. Choices in mating and breeding into quality oriented produce. Collaboration beyond the digital realm [physical contexts that agency obliges].

    On the positive, prohibit a country to own you. Voting with your feet. ...

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard

    Curtis Yarvin has been promoting this for twenty years. He claims his mom is not a jew. There is a proverb.

    Jews do not have roots; they have legs.

    It is a workaround kluge and deep down inside most women hate it. My aunt did our family tree about ten years ago and she gave me thirty pages on my mom’s family going back to the early 1800’s. The thing that stuck out to me is nearly every female was accounted for birth to death and few of them ever moved. Half the males disappeared. Their life was one sentence.

    He moved to X to work. He went to war Y and was killed. He went to Z and was not heard from again.

    There were only a tiny fraction she got married to A and moved to X. I don’t understand how they got spewed all over the United States and beyond but there is one direction the centrifugal force never goes. In my parents’ generation they used to have a thing they called getting married and settling down. My parents did not do that.

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @Emil Nikola Richard

    A settled down couple getting old together is probably something that only a minority of kids will go through in the next couple of generations in the West. And this is also getting more prevalent in RusFed. According to latest statistics, in the ethnic Slav Russian hinterland, nowadays around 75% of the marriages end up with a divorce. I have met a few young people that told me that they don't believe in marriage and I don't blame them, how can anyone believe in something that has been so thoroughly discredited...

  1061. @LatW
    @Greasy William


    Too bad we don’t have more working class Muslims in America who could do such a thing.
     
    In America, in most places they would not be able to get away with things they get away with in France, the American cops are more ruthless and less ceremonial than the French ones (although the French cops seem to be doing a somewhat decent job given what they have to put up with).

    I don’t believe this uprising can be disconnected from the rising cost of living that is devestating working people all over the world. People are struggling to afford basic necessities and it’s putting a tremendous amount of stress on the whole rotten, globalist system.
     
    The native Europeans of lesser means are also affected by the rise of cost of living, the native Europeas are also harassed and assaulted by African immigrants and sometimes murdered by them, yet they don't go around looting, burning their compatriots' vehicles and breaking windows. Arson is a very serious crime, there is absolutely no excuse for it. There is no police racism in France, the problem is that North Africans are often not well behaved. Everyone knows this, what is the point of pretending to not see it?

    Replies: @Greasy William, @Matra

    In America, in most places they would not be able to get away with things they get away with in France, the American cops are more ruthless

    I guess you don’t remember 2020 when thousands of buildings were burned down in a nationwide state organised uprising against Donald Trump. American police are pussies who love bullying law-abiding white people.

    • Agree: Ivashka the fool
  1062. @Emil Nikola Richard
    @PetrOldSack

    Curtis Yarvin has been promoting this for twenty years. He claims his mom is not a jew. There is a proverb.


    Jews do not have roots; they have legs.
     
    It is a workaround kluge and deep down inside most women hate it. My aunt did our family tree about ten years ago and she gave me thirty pages on my mom's family going back to the early 1800's. The thing that stuck out to me is nearly every female was accounted for birth to death and few of them ever moved. Half the males disappeared. Their life was one sentence.

    He moved to X to work. He went to war Y and was killed. He went to Z and was not heard from again.

    There were only a tiny fraction she got married to A and moved to X. I don't understand how they got spewed all over the United States and beyond but there is one direction the centrifugal force never goes. In my parents' generation they used to have a thing they called getting married and settling down. My parents did not do that.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

    A settled down couple getting old together is probably something that only a minority of kids will go through in the next couple of generations in the West. And this is also getting more prevalent in RusFed. According to latest statistics, in the ethnic Slav Russian hinterland, nowadays around 75% of the marriages end up with a divorce. I have met a few young people that told me that they don’t believe in marriage and I don’t blame them, how can anyone believe in something that has been so thoroughly discredited…

  1063. @AP
    @Ivashka the fool


    And the aristocracy primary competitors always were the middle class bourgeois which are the carriers of the national spirit.
     
    No. The carriers of the national spirit were the peasantry. The middle class bourgeoisie were the carriers of nationalism.

    There is a difference.

    The bourgeoisie were the enemies of both the peasants and of the aristocracy. They in part cannibalized the spirit of the former as part of their method of brainwashing and organising the masses for the purpose of seizing power from the latter. This was done through mass literacy. The result is that the bourgeoisie took over their nations and then the nations engaged in mutual mass slaughter. Celine very eloquently described this process.

    But in the early stages, in the Vendee, it was bourgeoisie head-choppers/mass killer versus both aristocrats and peasants.

    A nuance in Eastern Europe was that there wasn’t much of a bourgeoisie, so this role was often played by petty gentry. So in Polish Austria the nobles who had become nationalists rebelled against the Hapsburgs. The peasants hadn’t yet become literate however, so they defended the Emperor and slaughtered the rebels.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Mr. Hack, @Coconuts, @Mr. XYZ

    There is a contradiction in what you wrote. On one hand you correctly wrote that the Austro-Hungarian (and Russian) Empire(s) were pre-national, but on the other hand, you write that peasantry was the carriers of the national spirit. If they weren’t a nation, how could they carry a nation’s spirit?

    In fact, there was no national spirit among the peasant, as well as there was no national spirit among the higher aristocracy. The nation idea is a middle class trope. The middle class corresponding to lower income and rank nobility and la bourgeoisie.

    Once these social strata got prevalent and influential enough, they transformed the folkish spirit of the peasants to make them into a nation. That’s the main reason it didn’t happen in RusFed, the RusFed-ian elites and an important part of the middle class are antinational Noviop and the Russian Empire bourgeoisie on top of being somewhat of mixed origin, was not influential and not patriotic enough (with the exception of the Old Believer merchant dynasties).

    Anyway, going back to Kalergi, he and his circle were anti-national and they put the West on the path to nation-destruction with the help of Atlanticist networks and Jewish capital. Those are the ones to blame, they and their Anglo-Saxon enablers and cultural Marxist fellow travelers.

    https://archives.eui.eu/en/fonds/181675?item=PAN%2FEU-23

    Either you have Atlanticist United Europe or an Europe of autonomous and independent nations. One excludes the other.

    • Replies: @AP
    @Ivashka the fool


    There is a contradiction in what you wrote. On one hand you correctly wrote that the Austro-Hungarian (and Russian) Empire(s) were pre-national, but on the other hand, you write that peasantry was the carriers of the national spirit. If they weren’t a nation, how could they carry a nation’s spirit?
     
    I think it's misunderstanding of terms, and I wasn't clear.

    I contrasted "national spirit" (pre-nationalism) of peasants (ancient traditions, folk ways) and to a lesser extent nobility (more cosmopolitan than peasants, but also with their ancient traditions, and often in an organic relationship with peasants), to nationalism of the bourgeoisie.

    By "national spirit" I meant not ideological nationalism's concept but rather the collective traditions, folkways, way of life, Weltanschauung that had organically developed over hundreds or thousands of years in particular places among particular peoples. Peasants and aristocrats were carriers of that spirit; urban bourgeoisie were alienated from it, and created something approximate.

    In fact, there was no national spirit among the peasant, as well as there was no national spirit among the higher aristocracy.
     
    You are correct, we just used different terms.

    Once these social strata got prevalent and influential enough, they transformed the folkish spirit of the peasants to make them into a nation
     
    Correct. Using the tool of mass literacy.

    Either you have Atlanticist United Europe or an Europe of autonomous and independent nations.
     
    It does not exclude using the former to promote the latter. Particularly if the faces the danger of falling under a Eurasian despotism which is different and better and worse in different ways from the Atlanticism.

    Replies: @Dmitry, @Mr. XYZ

  1064. @Ivashka the fool
    @silviosilver

    Have I ever written that there is anything positive about this situation?

    No, I have written: sad for all those involved.

    Now, what would be practical, realistic and ethically sound to do in such a situation?

    Pressure to change attitudes, have a heavy punishment for the deviants, educate and reward those who adopt the needed behavior. A clear set of rules should be enunciated and uniformly applied to the whole of the French society. It should be universal. There should be no exceptions.

    Would it be done ?

    No. Because there is an important fraction of French society that would not accept a rigid meritocracy. And it is not les jeunes des banlieues, but the likes of Bernard Henri Lévy. They punch well above their weight in the postmodern degenerate France. They are the new aristocracy of the rotten French society, they are above the law and regulations. And they need the underclass of immigrant descent to weaken the native middle class and to keep it distracted. Divide and rule. Nothing new. Same as in US of A with the Afro-American thugs. Who had popularized Gangster Rap in US of A ?

    https://www.nationalreview.com/media-blog/blame-david-geffen-greg-pollowitz/

    Who popularized the violent Rap de banlieue in France ?

    https://dai.ly/xcp29h

    Who owned Canal + back then ?

    https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/seagram-dynasty-down-the-hatch/article4165136/

    It takes time to plant the seeds and see them grow. A multi generation endeavor.

    And yeah, one should always look into the flows on moneys, a simple question: where does the drug moneys from the US Afro-American and British massive hoods, as well as French banlieues end up ?

    The solution is not to eradicate migrants, but to inactivate those who enable migration, crime and social decay. The solution is a totalitarian rigidly moral meritocracy. But it would entail the demise of Capitalism and its replacement with something entirely different.

    Replies: @sudden death, @Anatoly Karlin, @silviosilver

    I support and endorse the French protesters.

    They are of course lumpenprole scum, with negligible revolutionary potential, but insofar as they undermine the authority of the centralized traditional French state, they constitute a progressive historical force in the march towards network states.

    • Thanks: Sher Singh
    • Replies: @QCIC
    @Anatoly Karlin

    The enemy of my enemy is my friend. LOL, that always works out great.

    The problem is that one's enemy is already manipulating the protesters to suit their agenda. You are also competing with other third parties who want to capitalize on the situation. The most likely outcome is stronger centralized control.

    Breaking things is not the same as replacing them.

    Replies: @John Johnson

    , @Ivashka the fool
    @Anatoly Karlin


    constitute a progressive historical force in the march towards network states.
     
    https://muzei-mira.com/templates/museum/images/paint/novaia-planeta-juon+.jpg

    The story goes like this: Earth is captured by a technocapital singularity as renaissance rationalization and oceanic navigation lock into commoditization take-off. Logistically accelerating techno-economic interactivity crumbles social order in auto sophisticating machine runaway. As markets learn to manufacture intelligence, politics modernizes, upgrades paranoia, and tries to get a grip.

    The body count climbs through a series of globewars. Emergent Planetary Commercium trashes the Holy Roman Empire, the Napoleonic Continental System, the Second and Third Reich, and the Soviet International, cranking-up world disorder through compressing phases. Deregulation and the state arms-race each other into cyberspace.

    By the time soft-engineering slithers out of its box into yours, human security is lurching into crisis. Cloning, lateral genodata transfer, transversal replication, and cyberotics, flood in amongst a relapse onto bacterial sex.

    Neo-China arrives from the future.

    Hypersynthetic drugs click into digital voodoo.

    Retro-disease.

    Nanospasm


    https://julesevans.medium.com/accelerationism-amphetamine-philosophy-and-the-death-trip-bb67ff079f8
  1065. S says:
    @Ivashka the fool
    @sudden death

    I have left France behind many years ago, as soon as I understood towards what it is headed. The last few years confirmed my worst expectations. My friends there keep telling me how it is changing for the worse, I still have family members there and they are also complaining. Where I currently live, I see thousands of French immigrants of higher middle class pouring in to leave behind the French morass. I am pretty certain unfortunately that in the medium / long term France is a basket case.

    Was talking about it with my sons yesterday, the elder was sad about it, but didn't contradict me. The younger laughed about it, he is studying in English and is firmly aimed at a global work market. He basically told me jokingly that as long as Westerners wouldn't go full Fasch, they will keep on losing ground to the Asians. In his elite college, half of the kids are wealthy immigrants from India and China, the local native middle class is a tiny minority of the students. He listens to what I say and keeps eyes open, he understands what is going on.

    The West has rotten because it got infected with a deadly virus that erased its cultural, spiritual and economic immunity. For a while the West still looked strong, just like an old tree still looks majestic although it is rotten inside. France is an extreme case, but the rest of the Globalized West is following in its footsteps. And no, there would be no relief until it crumbles. We will both be dead by then, but the coming generations will live in a World where the Western influence would be severely curtailed.

    The only unknown is the technology evolving towards sentience. Perhaps all we are discussing right now will look puny and irrelevant in a couple of decades because we probably already got our feet into the Singularity trap.

    But that won't help les Français de souche. They shouldn't have listened to the masonic demagoguery way back in 1780-ies. They would be the largest power today and we would be writing in French on this forum. But there is no way to repair what they did and what they are still proud of today. It all started back then...

    Replies: @S

    And they need the underclass of immigrant descent to weaken the native middle class and to keep it distracted. Divide and rule…And yeah, one should always look into the flows on moneys, a simple question: where does the drug moneys from the US Afro-American and British massive hoods, as well as French banlieues end up?

    Yes, divide and rule, most certainly.

    In regards to drugs, I sometimes have wondered if the ulterior motive for flooding China with opium during the 19th century was to reduce it’s hundreds of millions population to such an unnaturally low state of being that at some point they could then be successfully preyed upon enmasse as a near ‘bottomless’ source of wage slaves (ie ‘cheap labor’) for importation into the Anglosphere.

    The elites and hangers on involved in such an endeavor would have been the very same amoral, brutal, and ruthless types whom had previously been involved in chattel slavery and it’s trade, so certainly not something beyond them.

    Big money in drug sales, no doubt, but perhaps bigger money in wage slavery.

    The imported by diktat Chinese wage slaves (ie so called ‘cheap labor’) in the United States during the 1850s, 60’s, and 70s, were often being paid only about a third of whatever everyone else was for the very same labor.

    Anyhow, for the self proclaimed ‘progressives’, the ‘immigrant’ has long been a primary source of both their wealth and political power.

    https://www.academia.edu/27219183/Between_urban_and_national_Political_mobilization_among_Mizrahim_in_Israel_s_development_towns_

    ‘…the immigrants usually serve three main functions: cheap labor to replace native groups; settlement on the ‘frontier’ (periphery); and control over the natives and their land. These dynamics generally result in the maintenance of hegemony…’

    ‘To advance the project of territorial ethnicization, the immigrants usually serve three main functions: cheap labor to replace native groups; settlement on the ‘frontier’ (periphery); and control over the natives and their land. These dynamics generally result in the maintenance of hegemony…Meanwhile, the immigrants are contributing to the important national project of settlement, which provides them with a sense of belonging and certain material gains from the settling state…while the natives find themselves entirely excluded.’

  1066. @Emil Nikola Richard
    @Ivashka the fool

    Where do you think the omicron came from?

    Replies: @John Johnson

    Where do you think the omicron came from?

    Most likely mice or rats because it mutated quickly from the original and has DNA snippets for non-humans.

    But do explain your theory as to why there was a conspiracy to make a less lethal mutation.

  1067. @AP
    @Ivashka the fool


    And the aristocracy primary competitors always were the middle class bourgeois which are the carriers of the national spirit.
     
    No. The carriers of the national spirit were the peasantry. The middle class bourgeoisie were the carriers of nationalism.

    There is a difference.

    The bourgeoisie were the enemies of both the peasants and of the aristocracy. They in part cannibalized the spirit of the former as part of their method of brainwashing and organising the masses for the purpose of seizing power from the latter. This was done through mass literacy. The result is that the bourgeoisie took over their nations and then the nations engaged in mutual mass slaughter. Celine very eloquently described this process.

    But in the early stages, in the Vendee, it was bourgeoisie head-choppers/mass killer versus both aristocrats and peasants.

    A nuance in Eastern Europe was that there wasn’t much of a bourgeoisie, so this role was often played by petty gentry. So in Polish Austria the nobles who had become nationalists rebelled against the Hapsburgs. The peasants hadn’t yet become literate however, so they defended the Emperor and slaughtered the rebels.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Mr. Hack, @Coconuts, @Mr. XYZ

    The peasants hadn’t yet become literate however, so they defended the Emperor and slaughtered the rebels.

    In Austrian Ukraine, I don’t think that this model holds up. Peasants banded together in the 18th & 19th centuries (opryshki) and rebelled against most anybody with any status at all. In fact, the Austrian center had to send in gendarmes to calm the roving bands of brigands. Folk heroes like Oleksa Dovbush, Vasyl Baiurak, and Ivan Boichuk made their mark in Ukrainian history during this period.

  1068. @Mr. XYZ
    @John Johnson

    That's why it's a good idea for Detroit suburbs to have an excellent police presence. This used to be very politically doable though I'm unsure about right now due to the stupid current Woke moral panic about BL(D)M.

    This is especially sad even for blacks themselves since BL(D)M has apparently been deadlier for blacks than even Jim Crow was, according to Steve Sailer's research. Early 20th century Southern white supremacists would be proud of BL(D)M for getting so many additional blacks killed, unfortunately.

    FWIW, there have been some blacks moving into the Detroit suburbs since 1990, especially right to the northwest of Detroit:

    https://www.bridgemi.com/sites/default/files/2021-07/detroit-apple-news-version-3-1.jpg

    But Detroit suburbs are still mostly white (and Asian), thankfully.

    While there are laws against racial discrimination in housing in the US nowadays, a lot of neighborhoods in the US even nowadays are still *mostly* segregated by race. As in, overwhelmingly of a single race. I suspect that black crime has a lot to do with this.

    FWIW, I don't see a problem with the current situation in regards to this. This doesn't involve *state-mandated* segregation or even racially restrictive covenants, after all.

    Replies: @John Johnson

    That’s why it’s a good idea for Detroit suburbs to have an excellent police presence. This used to be very politically doable though I’m unsure about right now due to the stupid current Woke moral panic about BL(D)M.

    Even with a police presence they let Black youff steal cars and drive them over 100 mph.

    If they kill someone then it’s juvy for 2-3 years. You were just in the wrong place at the wrong time. That’s what they will write in the news.

    There are police all over Chicago. Doesn’t mean a damn thing when there is no political will or jail space to lock up all the criminals.

    The police will not save you from the gassing up problem. You gas up 30 minutes from a ghetto and run into Dawntre having a bad day. Well now it is your bad day.

    But Detroit suburbs are still mostly white (and Asian), thankfully.

    They are actually more Arab than Asian.

    The Arabs are the new Jews of Detroit. It used to be that the Jews were the economic middlemen for Blacks but they were chased out in the Detroit riots. Coptic Christians were purposely moved into Detroit by the Feds. You can get a green card if you basically agree to open a business in a Black area. My wife knows someone that came to the US via this route. You show around 100k in capital and have to work in an “underserved” area of their choosing. That is why so many Arabs own liquor and cell phone stores in Detroit. They didn’t move there by choice.

    FWIW, I don’t see a problem with the current situation in regards to this. This doesn’t involve *state-mandated* segregation or even racially restrictive covenants, after all.

    I guess but you still have the hollowing out problem. Blacks start migrating out of the city for services. They start going to grocery stores, restaurants and movie theaters in White burbs because said businesses don’t like to open in Black areas.

    The result is a hollowed out urban core with abandoned housing. I’m open to solutions to this problem that include public investment. I certainly don’t support the conservative view of the “Free market” somehow fixing this.

  1069. I am confused about Mr. Karlin.

    What prompted him to change his politics?

    Was it the RationalWiki page?

    https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Anatoly_Karlin

    Or was it because of a mental-breakdown over the Russo-Ukrainian War?

  1070. AP says:
    @Ivashka the fool
    @AP

    There is a contradiction in what you wrote. On one hand you correctly wrote that the Austro-Hungarian (and Russian) Empire(s) were pre-national, but on the other hand, you write that peasantry was the carriers of the national spirit. If they weren't a nation, how could they carry a nation's spirit?

    In fact, there was no national spirit among the peasant, as well as there was no national spirit among the higher aristocracy. The nation idea is a middle class trope. The middle class corresponding to lower income and rank nobility and la bourgeoisie.

    Once these social strata got prevalent and influential enough, they transformed the folkish spirit of the peasants to make them into a nation. That's the main reason it didn't happen in RusFed, the RusFed-ian elites and an important part of the middle class are antinational Noviop and the Russian Empire bourgeoisie on top of being somewhat of mixed origin, was not influential and not patriotic enough (with the exception of the Old Believer merchant dynasties).

    Anyway, going back to Kalergi, he and his circle were anti-national and they put the West on the path to nation-destruction with the help of Atlanticist networks and Jewish capital. Those are the ones to blame, they and their Anglo-Saxon enablers and cultural Marxist fellow travelers.

    https://blackcentraleurope.files.wordpress.com/2021/08/1944-kultur-terror.jpeg

    https://archives.eui.eu/en/fonds/181675?item=PAN%2FEU-23

    Either you have Atlanticist United Europe or an Europe of autonomous and independent nations. One excludes the other.

    Replies: @AP

    There is a contradiction in what you wrote. On one hand you correctly wrote that the Austro-Hungarian (and Russian) Empire(s) were pre-national, but on the other hand, you write that peasantry was the carriers of the national spirit. If they weren’t a nation, how could they carry a nation’s spirit?

    I think it’s misunderstanding of terms, and I wasn’t clear.

    I contrasted “national spirit” (pre-nationalism) of peasants (ancient traditions, folk ways) and to a lesser extent nobility (more cosmopolitan than peasants, but also with their ancient traditions, and often in an organic relationship with peasants), to nationalism of the bourgeoisie.

    By “national spirit” I meant not ideological nationalism’s concept but rather the collective traditions, folkways, way of life, Weltanschauung that had organically developed over hundreds or thousands of years in particular places among particular peoples. Peasants and aristocrats were carriers of that spirit; urban bourgeoisie were alienated from it, and created something approximate.

    In fact, there was no national spirit among the peasant, as well as there was no national spirit among the higher aristocracy.

    You are correct, we just used different terms.

    Once these social strata got prevalent and influential enough, they transformed the folkish spirit of the peasants to make them into a nation

    Correct. Using the tool of mass literacy.

    Either you have Atlanticist United Europe or an Europe of autonomous and independent nations.

    It does not exclude using the former to promote the latter. Particularly if the faces the danger of falling under a Eurasian despotism which is different and better and worse in different ways from the Atlanticism.

    • Replies: @Dmitry
    @AP


    urban bourgeoisie were alienated from it, and created something
     
    That is historically illiterate if you are discussing Europe. Most of the traditions and kind of European civilization were created by the burghers after the renaissance. What do you think the famous Italian culture is from?

    Replies: @AP

    , @Mr. XYZ
    @AP


    It does not exclude using the former to promote the latter. Particularly if the faces the danger of falling under a Eurasian despotism which is different and better and worse in different ways from the Atlanticism.
     
    Worth noting that there is also a middle ground here: A confederation of autonomous and independent European nations. This allows them to be a part of a world-power while still maintaining good amounts of their autonomy and independence in terms of domestic affairs (but not fully, of course).
  1071. QCIC says:
    @Anatoly Karlin
    @Ivashka the fool

    I support and endorse the French protesters.

    They are of course lumpenprole scum, with negligible revolutionary potential, but insofar as they undermine the authority of the centralized traditional French state, they constitute a progressive historical force in the march towards network states.

    Replies: @QCIC, @Ivashka the fool

    The enemy of my enemy is my friend. LOL, that always works out great.

    The problem is that one’s enemy is already manipulating the protesters to suit their agenda. You are also competing with other third parties who want to capitalize on the situation. The most likely outcome is stronger centralized control.

    Breaking things is not the same as replacing them.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
    @QCIC

    The enemy of my enemy is my friend. LOL, that always works out great.

    The problem is that one’s enemy is already manipulating the protesters to suit their agenda. You are also competing with other third parties who want to capitalize on the situation. The most likely outcome is stronger centralized control.

    They don't have to be friends or enemies.

    One can simply make the observation that the rioters are showing everyone as to what happens when you bring in too many third worlders. Well for the remaining Whites that haven't been to Paris.

    Similar to how BLM rioters showed everyone that you can't depend on the police and should own a gun if you value your security.

    Kyle being attacked by left-wing nutcases was the best endorsement the AR-15 has ever received. It doesn't mean that the nutcases are your friends. It means they served a useful if unintended purpose. In fact the one that got blasted was a convicted child abuser. A win/win/win.

  1072. @Anatoly Karlin
    @Ivashka the fool

    I support and endorse the French protesters.

    They are of course lumpenprole scum, with negligible revolutionary potential, but insofar as they undermine the authority of the centralized traditional French state, they constitute a progressive historical force in the march towards network states.

    Replies: @QCIC, @Ivashka the fool

    constitute a progressive historical force in the march towards network states.

    The story goes like this: Earth is captured by a technocapital singularity as renaissance rationalization and oceanic navigation lock into commoditization take-off. Logistically accelerating techno-economic interactivity crumbles social order in auto sophisticating machine runaway. As markets learn to manufacture intelligence, politics modernizes, upgrades paranoia, and tries to get a grip.

    The body count climbs through a series of globewars. Emergent Planetary Commercium trashes the Holy Roman Empire, the Napoleonic Continental System, the Second and Third Reich, and the Soviet International, cranking-up world disorder through compressing phases. Deregulation and the state arms-race each other into cyberspace.

    By the time soft-engineering slithers out of its box into yours, human security is lurching into crisis. Cloning, lateral genodata transfer, transversal replication, and cyberotics, flood in amongst a relapse onto bacterial sex.

    Neo-China arrives from the future.

    Hypersynthetic drugs click into digital voodoo.

    Retro-disease.

    Nanospasm

    https://julesevans.medium.com/accelerationism-amphetamine-philosophy-and-the-death-trip-bb67ff079f8

  1073. @AP
    @Dmitry


    "post-industrial shithole in northern England"

    Maybe there are some better experts here, but I don’t think Northern England is some kind of postindustrial dystopia, without modern companies or advanced jobs for engineers.
     
    It depends upon where in northern England. Much of it is like the US Rust Belt. Rotherham, Leeds region , etc. Startups may be new, but he was living there before that time. Cheap places may appeal to startups. But it's a miserable place for most:

    https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-eu-voters/in-englands-forgotten-rust-belt-voters-show-little-sign-of-brexit-regret-idUSKBN1KS0VM

    A Sovok civil "engineer" from 30 years ago is probably not going to be involved in startups.

    High crime:

    https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2020/01/01/17/22882596-0-image-a-1_1577900274503.jpg

    High unemployment:

    https://datawrapper.dwcdn.net/pAa5X/full.png

    Low income:

    https://www.ippr.org/files/news-and-media/press-releases/IPPRNorth_GDHI-UK%20heatmap_7Aug2015.png

    For comparison, within the EU, Tallin attains as the most successful postcommunist city from viewpoint of future economy or hi-tech funding. Manchester a small city in Northern England, has more unicorns than Tallin, larger enterprise value than Tallin.
     
    Tallinn has 450,00 people vs. 550,000 for Manchester.

    Tallinn and surrounding county has 600,000. Manchester county it is 2.9 million.

    Wiki about Talinn: "Tallinn has the highest number of startup companies per person among all capitals and larger cities in Europe[12] and is the birthplace of many international high-technology companies, including Skype, Wise and Bolt.[13][7] The city is home to the headquarters of the European Union's IT agency,[14] and to the NATO Cyber Defence Centre of Excellence. In 2007, Tallinn was listed among the top-10 digital cities in the world,[15] and in 2022, Tallinn was listed among the top-10 "medium-sized European cities of the future".[16]"

    Replies: @Coconuts, @Dmitry

    startup companies per person among all capitals and larger cities in Europe

    This is surely marketing from tourism department, because they exclude many small cities which have more than them.

    Also I would guess not actually true if you compare to some large cities like London. Perhaps they are limited to large cities of the EU.

    vs. 550,000 for Manchester.

    Manchester is not so bad, they will soon have more unicorns (startups valued over $1 billion within 10 years), than large postcommunist countries like Poland with populations of 40 million.

    For example, if you add together British cities like Manchester + Belfast, the startups in those two receive more venture capital than all Poland last year.

    Cheap places may appeal to startups. But it’s a miserable place for most:

    Compared to where? The standard of living is very high in those places, if you look at the data and compare to most other countries. We discussed already the income situation of the population i.e. the low income people are not really low income, according to your own judgements for other countries.

    defines happiness in a way that is not actually happiness:

    https://edition.cnn.com/travel/article/world-happiest-countries-2023-wellness/index.html

    healthy life expectancy, GDP per capita, social support, low corruption, generosity in a community where people look after each other and freedom to make key life decisions.

    These are nice things,

    Sure, it’s not a great measure and not exactly happiness. But it is an example of a kind of development index, created by the economists, which focuses on mix of those indexes.

    Another example is the UN’s HDI index, which also has mostly small countries in terms of population near the top.

    Another is “Better Life Index”, which has many small countries in top.

    There is “Social Progress Index”, which has kind of similar results.
    https://www.socialprogress.org/global-index-2022-results/

    • Replies: @LatW
    @Dmitry

    It's not even all about startups. Manchester is the home of Manchester United, a legendary soccer club. Are you kidding? This is the town where David Beckham and Cristiano Ronaldo used to live. Even if one doesn't enjoy the soccer culture, it still comes with lots of money, status, even values of hard work and self-discipline. They have neo-Gothic Victorian architecture.

    Yes, it has economic contrast but it is thriving. There is still advanced heavy manufacturing there, which is a compliment to any serious city these days.

    Replies: @Dmitry

  1074. @Yahya
    @Ivashka the fool


    The likes of Jacques Attali would prevent them from doing whatever needs to be done.
     
    The French people don't realize how small a window they have to rescue themselves from cultural and demographic oblivion. They probably think "oh well, the Muslims are only 10% of the population; and the disturbances are relegated to the suburbs which no-one else bothers going to anyway". But few of them have probably looked into demographic projections. If they did, they would know that Muslims would comprise 50% of the working age population somewhere around the 2070 mark. By that time it would pretty much over for traditional French civilization. Pensioners are old, exhausted and functionally useless. The future belongs to da yoofs, and there aren't many ethnic Frenchmen who can be imported from elsewhere.

    The situation can be still be salvaged; but a modicum of foresight and ethnocentrism seems to be too heavy a lift for modern Westerners. The future of Western Europe will therefore be determined by Islam or AI. It is a race between Bedouins and the Machine.

    Replies: @Greasy William

    The situation can be still be salvaged; but a modicum of foresight and ethnocentrism seems to be too heavy a lift for modern Westerners.

    They subconsciously understand that their civilization isn’t worth saving

    • Agree: Ivashka the fool
  1075. @AP
    @Ivashka the fool


    There is a contradiction in what you wrote. On one hand you correctly wrote that the Austro-Hungarian (and Russian) Empire(s) were pre-national, but on the other hand, you write that peasantry was the carriers of the national spirit. If they weren’t a nation, how could they carry a nation’s spirit?
     
    I think it's misunderstanding of terms, and I wasn't clear.

    I contrasted "national spirit" (pre-nationalism) of peasants (ancient traditions, folk ways) and to a lesser extent nobility (more cosmopolitan than peasants, but also with their ancient traditions, and often in an organic relationship with peasants), to nationalism of the bourgeoisie.

    By "national spirit" I meant not ideological nationalism's concept but rather the collective traditions, folkways, way of life, Weltanschauung that had organically developed over hundreds or thousands of years in particular places among particular peoples. Peasants and aristocrats were carriers of that spirit; urban bourgeoisie were alienated from it, and created something approximate.

    In fact, there was no national spirit among the peasant, as well as there was no national spirit among the higher aristocracy.
     
    You are correct, we just used different terms.

    Once these social strata got prevalent and influential enough, they transformed the folkish spirit of the peasants to make them into a nation
     
    Correct. Using the tool of mass literacy.

    Either you have Atlanticist United Europe or an Europe of autonomous and independent nations.
     
    It does not exclude using the former to promote the latter. Particularly if the faces the danger of falling under a Eurasian despotism which is different and better and worse in different ways from the Atlanticism.

    Replies: @Dmitry, @Mr. XYZ

    urban bourgeoisie were alienated from it, and created something

    That is historically illiterate if you are discussing Europe. Most of the traditions and kind of European civilization were created by the burghers after the renaissance. What do you think the famous Italian culture is from?

    • Replies: @AP
    @Dmitry


    Most of the traditions and kind of European civilization were created by the burghers after the renaissance
     
    Which ones?

    Replies: @Dmitry

  1076. LatW says:

    One thing to note about the young Asians who are flooding the US universities and the job market is that, while there are many of them, they do not seem to retain any traditionalist attitudes, with the exception of maybe the Sikhs (it may be that the bulk of them already arrive in the US deeply secularized from countries such as China and India).

    Yes, they are flooding the job market and taking many best paying jobs, but guess what? They won’t be having a lot of kids, in fact, a significant part of them will most likely remain single and childless. That is clearly evident by their attitudes and lifestyle, even demeanor. Many of them are concentrated in places such as San Francisco, places that are prominent for their childlessness. Whites move out to the small towns when they want to start a family, these Asians will be slaves to the rat race for most of their lives, in the city, with one kid at most, many of the guys will be incels forever. Kind of sad almost.

    My hunch is even that the middle class Whites will have a higher birthrate than these overeducated, overly ambitious, credentials and high wage seeking Asians.

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @LatW

    Younger generation Extreme Orientals are very individualistic. I have known a few among them, those who I have known were very hard working and talented, but they were indeed not very family oriented. They were also very materialistic. But they are not as hedonist as the postmodern younger Whites are. Indians seem more family oriented, more involved with their community and more clanish.

    Replies: @LatW

  1077. LatW says:
    @Dmitry
    @AP


    startup companies per person among all capitals and larger cities in Europe

     

    This is surely marketing from tourism department, because they exclude many small cities which have more than them.

    Also I would guess not actually true if you compare to some large cities like London. Perhaps they are limited to large cities of the EU.

    vs. 550,000 for Manchester.
     
    Manchester is not so bad, they will soon have more unicorns (startups valued over $1 billion within 10 years), than large postcommunist countries like Poland with populations of 40 million.

    For example, if you add together British cities like Manchester + Belfast, the startups in those two receive more venture capital than all Poland last year.


    Cheap places may appeal to startups. But it’s a miserable place for most:
     
    Compared to where? The standard of living is very high in those places, if you look at the data and compare to most other countries. We discussed already the income situation of the population i.e. the low income people are not really low income, according to your own judgements for other countries.

    defines happiness in a way that is not actually happiness:

    https://edition.cnn.com/travel/article/world-happiest-countries-2023-wellness/index.html

    healthy life expectancy, GDP per capita, social support, low corruption, generosity in a community where people look after each other and freedom to make key life decisions.

    These are nice things,
     

    Sure, it's not a great measure and not exactly happiness. But it is an example of a kind of development index, created by the economists, which focuses on mix of those indexes.

    Another example is the UN's HDI index, which also has mostly small countries in terms of population near the top.

    Another is "Better Life Index", which has many small countries in top.

    There is "Social Progress Index", which has kind of similar results.
    https://www.socialprogress.org/global-index-2022-results/

    Replies: @LatW

    It’s not even all about startups. Manchester is the home of Manchester United, a legendary soccer club. Are you kidding? This is the town where David Beckham and Cristiano Ronaldo used to live. Even if one doesn’t enjoy the soccer culture, it still comes with lots of money, status, even values of hard work and self-discipline. They have neo-Gothic Victorian architecture.

    Yes, it has economic contrast but it is thriving. There is still advanced heavy manufacturing there, which is a compliment to any serious city these days.

    • Replies: @Dmitry
    @LatW

    In the 19th century, it was a high-tech manufacturing city, vanguard of the world economy.

    In the 20th century, they declined from high-tech manufacturing center, to become a small regional city with noncompetitive economy, falling population. It was more famous for the sports teams and the musical bands like "Joy Division".

    In 21st century, if you follow those funding patterns, it will be medium important in the future industries. A lot less than London, but still they would have more future industry than most of the cities of Europe.


    even values of hard work and self-discipline. They have neo-Gothic Victorian architecture.
     
    It's kind of Buenos Aires symptom. Cities like Manchester and Buenos Aires were a center of world capitalism in the 19th century, they inherit luxury architecture.

    In comparison, Dublin was a poor economy in the 19th century and has so many of the small, boring buildings, nonimpressive architecture.

    Replies: @LatW

  1078. @QCIC
    @Anatoly Karlin

    The enemy of my enemy is my friend. LOL, that always works out great.

    The problem is that one's enemy is already manipulating the protesters to suit their agenda. You are also competing with other third parties who want to capitalize on the situation. The most likely outcome is stronger centralized control.

    Breaking things is not the same as replacing them.

    Replies: @John Johnson

    The enemy of my enemy is my friend. LOL, that always works out great.

    The problem is that one’s enemy is already manipulating the protesters to suit their agenda. You are also competing with other third parties who want to capitalize on the situation. The most likely outcome is stronger centralized control.

    They don’t have to be friends or enemies.

    One can simply make the observation that the rioters are showing everyone as to what happens when you bring in too many third worlders. Well for the remaining Whites that haven’t been to Paris.

    Similar to how BLM rioters showed everyone that you can’t depend on the police and should own a gun if you value your security.

    Kyle being attacked by left-wing nutcases was the best endorsement the AR-15 has ever received. It doesn’t mean that the nutcases are your friends. It means they served a useful if unintended purpose. In fact the one that got blasted was a convicted child abuser. A win/win/win.

    • Agree: LatW
  1079. @AP
    @Ivashka the fool


    And the aristocracy primary competitors always were the middle class bourgeois which are the carriers of the national spirit.
     
    No. The carriers of the national spirit were the peasantry. The middle class bourgeoisie were the carriers of nationalism.

    There is a difference.

    The bourgeoisie were the enemies of both the peasants and of the aristocracy. They in part cannibalized the spirit of the former as part of their method of brainwashing and organising the masses for the purpose of seizing power from the latter. This was done through mass literacy. The result is that the bourgeoisie took over their nations and then the nations engaged in mutual mass slaughter. Celine very eloquently described this process.

    But in the early stages, in the Vendee, it was bourgeoisie head-choppers/mass killer versus both aristocrats and peasants.

    A nuance in Eastern Europe was that there wasn’t much of a bourgeoisie, so this role was often played by petty gentry. So in Polish Austria the nobles who had become nationalists rebelled against the Hapsburgs. The peasants hadn’t yet become literate however, so they defended the Emperor and slaughtered the rebels.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Mr. Hack, @Coconuts, @Mr. XYZ

    I’ve seen that there has been some new discussion around the idea of ‘Aristo-Populism’ in the conservative/post-liberal press, after Patrick Deneen just published ‘Regime Change’, the sequel to his earlier book ‘Why Liberalism Failed’. His ideas are supposed to be inspired by the old medieval ‘mixed constitution’ model of Aquinas and other scholastic political writers, but updated for a modern context.

    A model like this might be interesting in the future if the predictions about middle class liberal fertility prove correct, and the future population turns out to be more made up of the children of lower educational level and conservative and/or religious higher level people.

    Some ideas like this used to exist in French other European countries’ politics, the alliance of ‘warriors and producers’ against merchants and traders and it produced some unusual variants of anti-bourgeois socialism that were more favourable to the old aristocracy.

    Another idea from the broad Integralist tradition was that nations like France and Spain were the creation of monarchy and depended on it for their survival. The monarchy was understood as the unitary source of independent sovereignty that could ‘organise’ the other component parts of the nation and prevent them falling into conflict with each other, or factional conflict within them.

    It seems De Gaulle was influenced by this tradition when he designed the Vth Republic constitution and it’s one reason why the French presidency is powerful, even if by now it is a more watered down version of what he intended.

    • Thanks: Ivashka the fool
  1080. @LatW
    One thing to note about the young Asians who are flooding the US universities and the job market is that, while there are many of them, they do not seem to retain any traditionalist attitudes, with the exception of maybe the Sikhs (it may be that the bulk of them already arrive in the US deeply secularized from countries such as China and India).

    Yes, they are flooding the job market and taking many best paying jobs, but guess what? They won't be having a lot of kids, in fact, a significant part of them will most likely remain single and childless. That is clearly evident by their attitudes and lifestyle, even demeanor. Many of them are concentrated in places such as San Francisco, places that are prominent for their childlessness. Whites move out to the small towns when they want to start a family, these Asians will be slaves to the rat race for most of their lives, in the city, with one kid at most, many of the guys will be incels forever. Kind of sad almost.

    My hunch is even that the middle class Whites will have a higher birthrate than these overeducated, overly ambitious, credentials and high wage seeking Asians.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

    Younger generation Extreme Orientals are very individualistic. I have known a few among them, those who I have known were very hard working and talented, but they were indeed not very family oriented. They were also very materialistic. But they are not as hedonist as the postmodern younger Whites are. Indians seem more family oriented, more involved with their community and more clanish.

    • Replies: @LatW
    @Ivashka the fool


    Younger generation Extreme Orientals are very individualistic. I have known a few among them, those who I have known were very hard working and talented, but they were indeed not very family oriented. They were also very materialistic.
     
    Yes, they do have some appealing qualities, they're mellow and non-confrontational. The younger women and men are very easy and pleasant to be around, the older women can at times be a bit difficult (they can be strangely conformist and rigid, yet occasionally "bossy" all at the same time but I would chalk it up to the daily stresses they endure in that age group, not their ethnic background).

    However, the Chinese in particular are very driven, very status oriented, but very rigid. The women are highly materialistic. I don't know much about their relationship dynamic, but I see a lot of single women who are in no rush to become moms (and with the kind of career choices they've made they probably couldn't even fit it in).

    The older UMC educated Chinese women either don't have kids or have one, I knew a very nice young Hapa man whose mother is an educated and highly organized woman from Hong Kong, and she's struggling with her son (who, while very attractive, mild mannered and cultivated, also has mental issues and wants to be a kind of a "dark" artist, which is pretty cool but this won't make him some robust family man in the future - that's a second gen Asian for you). I just don't see how most of these ambitious younger Chinese women who speak bad English but are still paid a lot because they overachieve, how they're going to have a sufficient number of kids. When these women get older and move into their overpriced homes, I wonder if they're still going to be compelled to vote for high-taxation parties such as the Democrat party. Some probably will (those who are employed in the public sector), but maybe not all of them.


    But they are not as hedonist as the postmodern younger Whites are.
     
    Depends on what one means by "hedonist". Frankly, they are overall just nerdier (which in and of itself isn't bad, but they lack creativity, quirkiness, originality and sex appeal, with few exceptions - again, I don't want to be too judgmental here, they don't have to be that way to be good people, they are good bees in the hive). They are overall less creative (with the exception of Japanese) so less bohemian, but they do indulge in materialism.

    As to younger Whites, they are different - some are of course out of control, but many young Whites are actually more chaste than the previous generations (especially Boomers and Gen X, many of whom were totally out of control). So there may have been a backlash to some extent (or something has changed in the culture). Maybe not enough to make a difference but it is noticeable. They are still somewhat spoiled, but at least some of them are looking for healthy solutions and some are looking for ways away from the mainstream culture.

    They are not necessarily trad or family oriented, but they are not loose either. They prioritize education, life experiences, "causes", for some of the younger women I know, I feel that they see avoiding (the bad kind of) "hedonism" as necessary for the sake of their physical and mental health, which is a very healthy instinct. Or they have taken their hedonism away from more destructive things and moved towards things such as art, travel or experiences. Eventually they will have families, just not very large ones. Some working class Whites are still having quite a few kids.


    Indians seem more family oriented, more involved with their community and more clanish.
     
    Indians are indeed slightly more family oriented, but even they no longer have that many kids. The H1B software guys will stay single for a long time. The younger women who are now having decent careers with tech startups will most likely not go on to become "submissive wives" and will not prioritize family any time soon. That said, there is such an enormous number of them, that they could keep arriving into the US and Europe for years, if not decades to come. The good thing about them is they are not violent.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Mr. XYZ

  1081. @LatW
    @Dmitry

    It's not even all about startups. Manchester is the home of Manchester United, a legendary soccer club. Are you kidding? This is the town where David Beckham and Cristiano Ronaldo used to live. Even if one doesn't enjoy the soccer culture, it still comes with lots of money, status, even values of hard work and self-discipline. They have neo-Gothic Victorian architecture.

    Yes, it has economic contrast but it is thriving. There is still advanced heavy manufacturing there, which is a compliment to any serious city these days.

    Replies: @Dmitry

    In the 19th century, it was a high-tech manufacturing city, vanguard of the world economy.

    In the 20th century, they declined from high-tech manufacturing center, to become a small regional city with noncompetitive economy, falling population. It was more famous for the sports teams and the musical bands like “Joy Division”.

    In 21st century, if you follow those funding patterns, it will be medium important in the future industries. A lot less than London, but still they would have more future industry than most of the cities of Europe.

    even values of hard work and self-discipline. They have neo-Gothic Victorian architecture.

    It’s kind of Buenos Aires symptom. Cities like Manchester and Buenos Aires were a center of world capitalism in the 19th century, they inherit luxury architecture.

    In comparison, Dublin was a poor economy in the 19th century and has so many of the small, boring buildings, nonimpressive architecture.

    • Replies: @LatW
    @Dmitry


    Cities like Manchester and Buenos Aires were a center of world capitalism in the 19th century, they inherit luxury architecture.
     
    But this is wonderful. All the different cultural layers of the city, from different eras, are still there.

    The 19th century industrial heritage, in some cities one can still see it, and even if it is gone, one can still feel it, even if old industrial neighborhoods have gentrified, there is a cool atmosphere, I like it when they remodel old factories and house boutique businesses and lofts there, of course, it's sad that those are no longer working factories, but it is a cozy urban environment with a tinge of history.


    In comparison, Dublin was a poor economy in the 19th century and has so many of the small, boring buildings, nonimpressive architecture.
     
    Dublin has Georgian buildings, although I do not find those all that impressive - I'm used to more luxurious and lavish architectural styles. Dublin's main attraction is the Temple Bar district, rich in character and cozy, even if architecturally not that spectacular. Dublin's forte is not architecture, but it's warm, welcoming atmosphere.

    Replies: @Dmitry

  1082. @Ivashka the fool
    @silviosilver

    Have I ever written that there is anything positive about this situation?

    No, I have written: sad for all those involved.

    Now, what would be practical, realistic and ethically sound to do in such a situation?

    Pressure to change attitudes, have a heavy punishment for the deviants, educate and reward those who adopt the needed behavior. A clear set of rules should be enunciated and uniformly applied to the whole of the French society. It should be universal. There should be no exceptions.

    Would it be done ?

    No. Because there is an important fraction of French society that would not accept a rigid meritocracy. And it is not les jeunes des banlieues, but the likes of Bernard Henri Lévy. They punch well above their weight in the postmodern degenerate France. They are the new aristocracy of the rotten French society, they are above the law and regulations. And they need the underclass of immigrant descent to weaken the native middle class and to keep it distracted. Divide and rule. Nothing new. Same as in US of A with the Afro-American thugs. Who had popularized Gangster Rap in US of A ?

    https://www.nationalreview.com/media-blog/blame-david-geffen-greg-pollowitz/

    Who popularized the violent Rap de banlieue in France ?

    https://dai.ly/xcp29h

    Who owned Canal + back then ?

    https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/seagram-dynasty-down-the-hatch/article4165136/

    It takes time to plant the seeds and see them grow. A multi generation endeavor.

    And yeah, one should always look into the flows on moneys, a simple question: where does the drug moneys from the US Afro-American and British massive hoods, as well as French banlieues end up ?

    The solution is not to eradicate migrants, but to inactivate those who enable migration, crime and social decay. The solution is a totalitarian rigidly moral meritocracy. But it would entail the demise of Capitalism and its replacement with something entirely different.

    Replies: @sudden death, @Anatoly Karlin, @silviosilver

    Have I ever written that there is anything positive about this situation?

    Well yes, you in fact just did. You said at least immigrants were injecting youth into an aging society. That is an attempt to see the situation in a more positive light.

    Now, what would be practical, realistic and ethically sound to do in such a situation?

    Ethical would be to racially and culturally live on, rather than resign yourself to racially and culturally dying out.

    If practicality and realism are not pursued with that end in mind, they are altogether pointless – indeed, unethical.

    If you do view that end as immoral, I think it would simplify this discussion if you were to just admit you don’t really wish to see the racial status quo fundamentally altered. (That is the real function of softeners like “practical, realistic and ethically sound,” I suspect.) And if the reason you consider it immoral is the upheaval and turmoil it would cause, I’d understand perfectly. I would disagree, but I wouldn’t consider you evil or deliberately destructive. But, sorry, I would consider you irresponsible. I would remind you that your descendants, many generations down the line, would find fault with your stated “bloodlines” values and your refusal to countenance decisive action – not to undertake it, merely to countenance it – when there was still some small chance those values could prevail.

    The solution is not to eradicate migrants, but to inactivate those who enable migration, crime and social decay.

    Actually, that really would be a solution. It would actually solve the problem. It would solve the problem of being racially and culturally overwhelmed by racially and culturally hostile aliens. It would remove the need to hope for the best and to tell yourself pretty lies. (Note: if we take “eradicate” to mean to uproot, to remove, rather than to physically destroy the people, which would be excessive, unnecessary, and immoral – after all, this world is big enough for all of us.) The fact that this would in no way whatsoever be simple or likely to occur, or that for it to occur would require a monumental transvaluation of values, of which only the faintest traces are at present evident, belongs squarely in the “no shit, Sherlock” department.

    The rest of your comment relates to the values and decision making of the ruling elite. For God’s sakes man, must the same talking points be rehearsed every time the immigration issue is discussed? Who the hell doesn’t understand that western elites have foisted this mess on western peoples, and for reasons that suit their immediate interests as well as their vision for a more peaceful, productive world – one which, in particular, allows us to avoid the horrors of the 20th century? (That is, they aim to do good at the same time as doing well, and if not the former then at least always the latter. It’s a can’t lose proposition, precisely the gravy train that sellout Karlin wishes he was on.) I think on a blog like this it should simply be taken for granted that one’s interlocutors possess this basic understanding, unless and until obvious evidence emerges that they don’t. That would save everybody a lot of unnecessary keystrokes.

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @silviosilver

    Well, tell me how should we proceed about eradicating the problem in France?

    Should we strip all the people of Maghrebi descent of French citizenship?

    Only the Muslims or should we also apply this rule to the Christians (there are some) and the Jews (a non-negligeable fraction) ?

    Should we only limit the eradicating to the Maghrebi or must we also take care of the Sub-Saharan Africans as well ?

    See the question about the religious affiliation above, the Sub-Saharan Africans are more often Christian though and I don't think there are native Jews among those.

    If we decide to deport all of them that would be probably more than 10 million people, how do we proceed?

    Ahat about the mixed children of which there are now hundreds of thousands, millions possibly?

    Should we also deport them and their French ethnic parents?

    I could go on, but I prefer to not waste much keystrokes, as you have written above.

    Being a maximalist is honorable, but being practical is better.

    How would you act on a practical level?

    I frankly don't see a solution, that is why I preferred not staying in France, which was way nicer at the time.

    And yes, I have strongly encouraged some of my friends from France to also think about leaving for the sake of their kids' future. It will just get worse there, especially if there is a war between Algeria and Morocco to which the Globalized West and Israel are pushing very hard. Then a Tsunami of Maghrebi migrants will wash upon southern European shores. And once the Maghrebi Arabo-Berber disorganized, then the billions of Sub-Saharan Africans will also move towards Europe, towards a better life. Especially with the climate change making their life in the Sahel even more difficult.

    How are you going to stop them ?

    Europe is fucked.

  1083. @Yahya
    @silviosilver


    Demographically, if the point of no return has indeed been passed, it is still worth pursuing the least bad outcome, and this too requires looking squarely at reality rather than evading it with feelgood fictions.
     
    According to Pew, the Muslim population in Western Europe is projected to be around 10-20% by 2050 depending on migration scenarios; with the working age population being around 40% Muslim.

    https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2017/11/29/europes-growing-muslim-population/

    If the Islamic demographic continues to grow, there will probably be an emergence of an Islamo-European civilization which would resemble Bosnia or modern Turkey somewhat viz. a strong secular elite culture mixed with working-class Islamism. Historically these fusionistic culture have existed within the Islamic world, but eventually they fizzle as the faithful Muslim population asserts itself and reduces the non-Muslim population to dhimmitude. A wave of conversion follows as non-Muslims are subjected to financial and social pressures; ultimately leading to an exclusivist Islamic society. This might be the fate in store for Europe, if they don’t nip things in the bud while they can.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @silviosilver

    . Historically these fusionistic culture have existed within the Islamic world, but eventually they fizzle as the faithful Muslim population asserts itself and reduces the non-Muslim population to dhimmitude.

    There’s a limit to how informative the historical trend is though. Those examples occurred back when religion was taken a lot more seriously, more literally, more unquestioningly; at a time when religion was regarded simply as “reality.” Today, Islamists struggle to impose their values even on historically Islamic societies (many of which technically were historically Christian, but eh, no need to take everything back to Adam and Eve). It’s far from a foregone conclusion that the same would eventually occur in societies in which liberal and rational values are so deeply embedded. (Of course, I’d much rather take the measures today which would obviate ever having to have to find out. Unfortunately, plenty of important people disagree.)

    This might be the fate in store for Europe, if they don’t nip things in the bud while they can.

    The nip it in the bud stage was fifty years ago. This is more like the “oh shit, I don’t think this is going to work out well at all” stage.

  1084. @silviosilver
    @Ivashka the fool


    Have I ever written that there is anything positive about this situation?
     
    Well yes, you in fact just did. You said at least immigrants were injecting youth into an aging society. That is an attempt to see the situation in a more positive light.

    Now, what would be practical, realistic and ethically sound to do in such a situation?
     
    Ethical would be to racially and culturally live on, rather than resign yourself to racially and culturally dying out.

    If practicality and realism are not pursued with that end in mind, they are altogether pointless - indeed, unethical.

    If you do view that end as immoral, I think it would simplify this discussion if you were to just admit you don't really wish to see the racial status quo fundamentally altered. (That is the real function of softeners like "practical, realistic and ethically sound," I suspect.) And if the reason you consider it immoral is the upheaval and turmoil it would cause, I'd understand perfectly. I would disagree, but I wouldn't consider you evil or deliberately destructive. But, sorry, I would consider you irresponsible. I would remind you that your descendants, many generations down the line, would find fault with your stated "bloodlines" values and your refusal to countenance decisive action - not to undertake it, merely to countenance it - when there was still some small chance those values could prevail.

    The solution is not to eradicate migrants, but to inactivate those who enable migration, crime and social decay.
     
    Actually, that really would be a solution. It would actually solve the problem. It would solve the problem of being racially and culturally overwhelmed by racially and culturally hostile aliens. It would remove the need to hope for the best and to tell yourself pretty lies. (Note: if we take "eradicate" to mean to uproot, to remove, rather than to physically destroy the people, which would be excessive, unnecessary, and immoral - after all, this world is big enough for all of us.) The fact that this would in no way whatsoever be simple or likely to occur, or that for it to occur would require a monumental transvaluation of values, of which only the faintest traces are at present evident, belongs squarely in the "no shit, Sherlock" department.

    The rest of your comment relates to the values and decision making of the ruling elite. For God's sakes man, must the same talking points be rehearsed every time the immigration issue is discussed? Who the hell doesn't understand that western elites have foisted this mess on western peoples, and for reasons that suit their immediate interests as well as their vision for a more peaceful, productive world - one which, in particular, allows us to avoid the horrors of the 20th century? (That is, they aim to do good at the same time as doing well, and if not the former then at least always the latter. It's a can't lose proposition, precisely the gravy train that sellout Karlin wishes he was on.) I think on a blog like this it should simply be taken for granted that one's interlocutors possess this basic understanding, unless and until obvious evidence emerges that they don't. That would save everybody a lot of unnecessary keystrokes.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool

    Well, tell me how should we proceed about eradicating the problem in France?

    Should we strip all the people of Maghrebi descent of French citizenship?

    Only the Muslims or should we also apply this rule to the Christians (there are some) and the Jews (a non-negligeable fraction) ?

    Should we only limit the eradicating to the Maghrebi or must we also take care of the Sub-Saharan Africans as well ?

    See the question about the religious affiliation above, the Sub-Saharan Africans are more often Christian though and I don’t think there are native Jews among those.

    If we decide to deport all of them that would be probably more than 10 million people, how do we proceed?

    Ahat about the mixed children of which there are now hundreds of thousands, millions possibly?

    Should we also deport them and their French ethnic parents?

    I could go on, but I prefer to not waste much keystrokes, as you have written above.

    Being a maximalist is honorable, but being practical is better.

    How would you act on a practical level?

    I frankly don’t see a solution, that is why I preferred not staying in France, which was way nicer at the time.

    And yes, I have strongly encouraged some of my friends from France to also think about leaving for the sake of their kids’ future. It will just get worse there, especially if there is a war between Algeria and Morocco to which the Globalized West and Israel are pushing very hard. Then a Tsunami of Maghrebi migrants will wash upon southern European shores. And once the Maghrebi Arabo-Berber disorganized, then the billions of Sub-Saharan Africans will also move towards Europe, towards a better life. Especially with the climate change making their life in the Sahel even more difficult.

    How are you going to stop them ?

    Europe is fucked.

  1085. LatW says:
    @Ivashka the fool
    @LatW

    Younger generation Extreme Orientals are very individualistic. I have known a few among them, those who I have known were very hard working and talented, but they were indeed not very family oriented. They were also very materialistic. But they are not as hedonist as the postmodern younger Whites are. Indians seem more family oriented, more involved with their community and more clanish.

    Replies: @LatW

    Younger generation Extreme Orientals are very individualistic. I have known a few among them, those who I have known were very hard working and talented, but they were indeed not very family oriented. They were also very materialistic.

    Yes, they do have some appealing qualities, they’re mellow and non-confrontational. The younger women and men are very easy and pleasant to be around, the older women can at times be a bit difficult (they can be strangely conformist and rigid, yet occasionally “bossy” all at the same time but I would chalk it up to the daily stresses they endure in that age group, not their ethnic background).

    However, the Chinese in particular are very driven, very status oriented, but very rigid. The women are highly materialistic. I don’t know much about their relationship dynamic, but I see a lot of single women who are in no rush to become moms (and with the kind of career choices they’ve made they probably couldn’t even fit it in).

    [MORE]

    The older UMC educated Chinese women either don’t have kids or have one, I knew a very nice young Hapa man whose mother is an educated and highly organized woman from Hong Kong, and she’s struggling with her son (who, while very attractive, mild mannered and cultivated, also has mental issues and wants to be a kind of a “dark” artist, which is pretty cool but this won’t make him some robust family man in the future – that’s a second gen Asian for you). I just don’t see how most of these ambitious younger Chinese women who speak bad English but are still paid a lot because they overachieve, how they’re going to have a sufficient number of kids. When these women get older and move into their overpriced homes, I wonder if they’re still going to be compelled to vote for high-taxation parties such as the Democrat party. Some probably will (those who are employed in the public sector), but maybe not all of them.

    But they are not as hedonist as the postmodern younger Whites are.

    Depends on what one means by “hedonist”. Frankly, they are overall just nerdier (which in and of itself isn’t bad, but they lack creativity, quirkiness, originality and sex appeal, with few exceptions – again, I don’t want to be too judgmental here, they don’t have to be that way to be good people, they are good bees in the hive). They are overall less creative (with the exception of Japanese) so less bohemian, but they do indulge in materialism.

    As to younger Whites, they are different – some are of course out of control, but many young Whites are actually more chaste than the previous generations (especially Boomers and Gen X, many of whom were totally out of control). So there may have been a backlash to some extent (or something has changed in the culture). Maybe not enough to make a difference but it is noticeable. They are still somewhat spoiled, but at least some of them are looking for healthy solutions and some are looking for ways away from the mainstream culture.

    They are not necessarily trad or family oriented, but they are not loose either. They prioritize education, life experiences, “causes”, for some of the younger women I know, I feel that they see avoiding (the bad kind of) “hedonism” as necessary for the sake of their physical and mental health, which is a very healthy instinct. Or they have taken their hedonism away from more destructive things and moved towards things such as art, travel or experiences. Eventually they will have families, just not very large ones. Some working class Whites are still having quite a few kids.

    Indians seem more family oriented, more involved with their community and more clanish.

    Indians are indeed slightly more family oriented, but even they no longer have that many kids. The H1B software guys will stay single for a long time. The younger women who are now having decent careers with tech startups will most likely not go on to become “submissive wives” and will not prioritize family any time soon. That said, there is such an enormous number of them, that they could keep arriving into the US and Europe for years, if not decades to come. The good thing about them is they are not violent.

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @LatW

    I think you are mostly right here in your (very feminine) observations. I don't think that the extreme Oriental immigrants would breed a lot in their host countries. They wouldn't have more than a couple of kids on average and they will mostly prioritize wealth and career. Interestingly, the Chinese do not seem to be against dating Whites. Both females and males seem to be open minded about metissage. But I think that for cultural and mentality reasons they would mostly marry inside their community. Idon't know about other ethnic groups from Extreme Orient, although I had Corean and Vietnamese contacts while studying and known a female Japanese postdoc who was a (sorry to say that) sexual tourist of sorts, sampling male students of different ethnicities and races, probably just a weird young lady not representative of her country/culture. I have also known a local White who did study in Japan and brought back a fiancée, they have two kids now, though she had a hard time adapting and they nearly split with her going back to Japan.

    The impression that I had, was that I get along easily with these people (I usually do with most people in general), although they certainly have a different way of thinking. They are indeed very materialistic, although they value natural beauty and perhaps beauty in general, at least those whom I known enough to discuss it with them. Those who immigrate to North America with money, there are many of them, are quite self-assured and do not hesitate to take yheir place. Not in the obnoxious FUSSR of Middle Eastern nouveau riche manner, but in a more down to earth practical way. Vancouver is a good example, it is very much Chinese, in some neighborhoods the local Whites are only represented by the heroine addicts sleeping on the street.

    And that's probably the real impact of the Extreme Oriental immigration, they are smart, hard working and relatively often arriving wealthy or hell bent on becoming wealthy. They buy properties, invest in SMEs, and alter the demographics of the neighborhoods where they reside by pricing out the locals. The fact that they breed not more than locals is not really important given that hundreds of millions there are available to do the travel to the West, especially if the Chinese economy slows down. I expect them to significantly alter the economic and demographic balance of North America and Oceania in the next few generations. Although them not being breeders would limit their total impact somewhat. Given that they are not against intermixing and intermarrying with locals, and that their youngsters are susceptible to Western fashions and fads, I think in the long run they will be well integrated into the local population. They already are actually.

    The Indians are different, they marry more inside the community and their culture is quite lively that is it is still quite energetic. They will probably create more or less self-centered communities with not much intermixing with the locals. It is partly due to their religious beliefs and also them still being somewhat tribal and casteist.

    Anyway, these communities are here to stay in the West and their influence should get growing because of them being quite successful. It would certainly influence the West towards a more cultural and spiritual diverse make up. Whether this is good or bad is hard to tell.

    Replies: @LatW, @S, @John Johnson

    , @Mr. XYZ
    @LatW


    Indians are indeed slightly more family oriented, but even they no longer have that many kids. The H1B software guys will stay single for a long time. The younger women who are now having decent careers with tech startups will most likely not go on to become “submissive wives” and will not prioritize family any time soon. That said, there is such an enormous number of them, that they could keep arriving into the US and Europe for years, if not decades to come. The good thing about them is they are not violent.

     

    Worth noting that the Indians in the US are considerably more elite than the Indians in Europe are:

    https://jsmp.dk/posts/2019-09-26-braindrain/immigration.html

    https://jsmp.dk/posts/2019-09-26-braindrain/images/2.png

    Though Indians in Europe are still more elite than Muslims in Europe are. In turn, unsurprisingly, Europe has much more problems with Muslims than with Indians.

    Replies: @LatW

  1086. LatW says:
    @Dmitry
    @LatW

    In the 19th century, it was a high-tech manufacturing city, vanguard of the world economy.

    In the 20th century, they declined from high-tech manufacturing center, to become a small regional city with noncompetitive economy, falling population. It was more famous for the sports teams and the musical bands like "Joy Division".

    In 21st century, if you follow those funding patterns, it will be medium important in the future industries. A lot less than London, but still they would have more future industry than most of the cities of Europe.


    even values of hard work and self-discipline. They have neo-Gothic Victorian architecture.
     
    It's kind of Buenos Aires symptom. Cities like Manchester and Buenos Aires were a center of world capitalism in the 19th century, they inherit luxury architecture.

    In comparison, Dublin was a poor economy in the 19th century and has so many of the small, boring buildings, nonimpressive architecture.

    Replies: @LatW

    Cities like Manchester and Buenos Aires were a center of world capitalism in the 19th century, they inherit luxury architecture.

    But this is wonderful. All the different cultural layers of the city, from different eras, are still there.

    The 19th century industrial heritage, in some cities one can still see it, and even if it is gone, one can still feel it, even if old industrial neighborhoods have gentrified, there is a cool atmosphere, I like it when they remodel old factories and house boutique businesses and lofts there, of course, it’s sad that those are no longer working factories, but it is a cozy urban environment with a tinge of history.

    In comparison, Dublin was a poor economy in the 19th century and has so many of the small, boring buildings, nonimpressive architecture.

    Dublin has Georgian buildings, although I do not find those all that impressive – I’m used to more luxurious and lavish architectural styles. Dublin’s main attraction is the Temple Bar district, rich in character and cozy, even if architecturally not that spectacular. Dublin’s forte is not architecture, but it’s warm, welcoming atmosphere.

    • Replies: @Dmitry
    @LatW


    main attraction is the Temple Bar district,
     
    It's architecturally good, but it's a small portion of the city. I used to live even quite near there. But in our area, it was the 21st century square boxes.

    Some people say going to Dublin is like going to a labor camp. Although I view there predictably as a very nostalgic city now.


    19th century industrial heritage, in some cities one can still see it, and even if it is gone, one can still feel it, even if old industrial neighborhoods
     
    The red color 19th century buildings where people like Engels were.

    But their startup boom looks like it is planting a lot of the "Dublin 21st century square boxes"

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2V3tPlvO3Go

  1087. @LatW
    @Ivashka the fool


    Younger generation Extreme Orientals are very individualistic. I have known a few among them, those who I have known were very hard working and talented, but they were indeed not very family oriented. They were also very materialistic.
     
    Yes, they do have some appealing qualities, they're mellow and non-confrontational. The younger women and men are very easy and pleasant to be around, the older women can at times be a bit difficult (they can be strangely conformist and rigid, yet occasionally "bossy" all at the same time but I would chalk it up to the daily stresses they endure in that age group, not their ethnic background).

    However, the Chinese in particular are very driven, very status oriented, but very rigid. The women are highly materialistic. I don't know much about their relationship dynamic, but I see a lot of single women who are in no rush to become moms (and with the kind of career choices they've made they probably couldn't even fit it in).

    The older UMC educated Chinese women either don't have kids or have one, I knew a very nice young Hapa man whose mother is an educated and highly organized woman from Hong Kong, and she's struggling with her son (who, while very attractive, mild mannered and cultivated, also has mental issues and wants to be a kind of a "dark" artist, which is pretty cool but this won't make him some robust family man in the future - that's a second gen Asian for you). I just don't see how most of these ambitious younger Chinese women who speak bad English but are still paid a lot because they overachieve, how they're going to have a sufficient number of kids. When these women get older and move into their overpriced homes, I wonder if they're still going to be compelled to vote for high-taxation parties such as the Democrat party. Some probably will (those who are employed in the public sector), but maybe not all of them.


    But they are not as hedonist as the postmodern younger Whites are.
     
    Depends on what one means by "hedonist". Frankly, they are overall just nerdier (which in and of itself isn't bad, but they lack creativity, quirkiness, originality and sex appeal, with few exceptions - again, I don't want to be too judgmental here, they don't have to be that way to be good people, they are good bees in the hive). They are overall less creative (with the exception of Japanese) so less bohemian, but they do indulge in materialism.

    As to younger Whites, they are different - some are of course out of control, but many young Whites are actually more chaste than the previous generations (especially Boomers and Gen X, many of whom were totally out of control). So there may have been a backlash to some extent (or something has changed in the culture). Maybe not enough to make a difference but it is noticeable. They are still somewhat spoiled, but at least some of them are looking for healthy solutions and some are looking for ways away from the mainstream culture.

    They are not necessarily trad or family oriented, but they are not loose either. They prioritize education, life experiences, "causes", for some of the younger women I know, I feel that they see avoiding (the bad kind of) "hedonism" as necessary for the sake of their physical and mental health, which is a very healthy instinct. Or they have taken their hedonism away from more destructive things and moved towards things such as art, travel or experiences. Eventually they will have families, just not very large ones. Some working class Whites are still having quite a few kids.


    Indians seem more family oriented, more involved with their community and more clanish.
     
    Indians are indeed slightly more family oriented, but even they no longer have that many kids. The H1B software guys will stay single for a long time. The younger women who are now having decent careers with tech startups will most likely not go on to become "submissive wives" and will not prioritize family any time soon. That said, there is such an enormous number of them, that they could keep arriving into the US and Europe for years, if not decades to come. The good thing about them is they are not violent.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Mr. XYZ

    I think you are mostly right here in your (very feminine) observations. I don’t think that the extreme Oriental immigrants would breed a lot in their host countries. They wouldn’t have more than a couple of kids on average and they will mostly prioritize wealth and career. Interestingly, the Chinese do not seem to be against dating Whites. Both females and males seem to be open minded about metissage. But I think that for cultural and mentality reasons they would mostly marry inside their community. Idon’t know about other ethnic groups from Extreme Orient, although I had Corean and Vietnamese contacts while studying and known a female Japanese postdoc who was a (sorry to say that) sexual tourist of sorts, sampling male students of different ethnicities and races, probably just a weird young lady not representative of her country/culture. I have also known a local White who did study in Japan and brought back a fiancée, they have two kids now, though she had a hard time adapting and they nearly split with her going back to Japan.

    The impression that I had, was that I get along easily with these people (I usually do with most people in general), although they certainly have a different way of thinking. They are indeed very materialistic, although they value natural beauty and perhaps beauty in general, at least those whom I known enough to discuss it with them. Those who immigrate to North America with money, there are many of them, are quite self-assured and do not hesitate to take yheir place. Not in the obnoxious FUSSR of Middle Eastern nouveau riche manner, but in a more down to earth practical way. Vancouver is a good example, it is very much Chinese, in some neighborhoods the local Whites are only represented by the heroine addicts sleeping on the street.

    And that’s probably the real impact of the Extreme Oriental immigration, they are smart, hard working and relatively often arriving wealthy or hell bent on becoming wealthy. They buy properties, invest in SMEs, and alter the demographics of the neighborhoods where they reside by pricing out the locals. The fact that they breed not more than locals is not really important given that hundreds of millions there are available to do the travel to the West, especially if the Chinese economy slows down. I expect them to significantly alter the economic and demographic balance of North America and Oceania in the next few generations. Although them not being breeders would limit their total impact somewhat. Given that they are not against intermixing and intermarrying with locals, and that their youngsters are susceptible to Western fashions and fads, I think in the long run they will be well integrated into the local population. They already are actually.

    The Indians are different, they marry more inside the community and their culture is quite lively that is it is still quite energetic. They will probably create more or less self-centered communities with not much intermixing with the locals. It is partly due to their religious beliefs and also them still being somewhat tribal and casteist.

    Anyway, these communities are here to stay in the West and their influence should get growing because of them being quite successful. It would certainly influence the West towards a more cultural and spiritual diverse make up. Whether this is good or bad is hard to tell.

    • Replies: @LatW
    @Ivashka the fool


    though she had a hard time adapting and they nearly split with her going back to Japan.
     
    That's tough. Plus the Japanese are very different from other Asians in that they are very attached to their homeland, especially women (who have a hard time being away from home). I don't think Japanese women should live in the West or among any Whites, because they are just so delicate and refined, I think White society is too rough for them. They are best sheltered at home. I also imagine that the relatively patriarchal relationships that they experience at home in Japan are not as bad as people sometimes make them out to be.

    although they value natural beauty
     
    Well, this is kind of universal, everyone values natural beauty, but, yes, I have known some who enjoy landscapes, camping, hiking. Overall they have good habits.

    Vancouver is a good example, it is very much Chinese, in some neighborhoods the local Whites are only represented by the heroine addicts sleeping on the street.
     
    I visited Vancouver several years ago and, yes, it is very Asian, not sure if it's majority Asian at this point, but I did see some decent looking and well dressed Whites there as well. Most Whites live on the outskirts of Vancouver, in all those suburban areas, the housing costs there are insane. However, the Pacific region of North America has always had strong Asian influences, with Japanese vessels washing up on the coast of the US and Canada in ancient times, with exquisite Japanese gardening and with all kinds of unique cultures such as Aleuts and native seafaring tribes (although those are not Asian, of course), and there is a long history of Chinese presence in places such as San Francisco, but of course these massive new waves of Asian immigrants is something different.

    The Indians can be problematic in that they have traditionally enjoyed partaking in leftist politics. They can be a little too pushy for my taste.

    Of course, these communities will affect the cultural make up of North America, although in the case of Vancouver and other such places, it would not hurt to remember that they were created by the British. These new Chinese arrivals should acknowledge that.

    Replies: @S, @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    , @S
    @Ivashka the fool


    I had Corean and Vietnamese contacts while studying and known a female Japanese postdoc who was a (sorry to say that) sexual tourist of sorts, sampling male students of different ethnicities and races, probably just a weird young lady not representative of her country/culture.
     
    Hmmm, I dunno. I'm certainly far from an expert on the subject, but I've heard from more than one 'open minded Westerner' that there's a streak of sexual obsessiveness/fetishizing amongst quite a few Japanese that almost enters into the realm of being a sickness.

    Those [Chinese] who immigrate to North America with money, there are many of them, are quite self-assured and do not hesitate to take yheir place.
     
    There was a reference book of joint authorship published circa 1870 in the United States that delved deeply into this very subject. They were very bullish on importing Chinese in vast numbers by diktat into the United States and the whole of the Anglosphere, as wage slaves (ie so called 'cheap labor) at that time. The project ultimately fell through for almost a hundred years (thru 1965) due to frankly righteous resistance.

    This resistance didn't go nearly far enough in that people such as the author here (LP Brockett MD) should have been removed from all positions of influence (ie this reference book containing his writing here was apparently in many university libraries, and the book should have been removed) and the few tens of thousands of Chinese left in the US after the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 should have been deported. The fanatical so called 'progressives' as it was simply used the remaining Chinese as a wedge and as an example of one more 'oppressed minority'.

    I have a low opinion of people such as Brockett as he (amongst others) with his championing of wage slavery is of the same ilk and mentality as those whom were involved in chattel slavery and it's trade, and for the very same exact gross immoral reasons.



    https://archive.org/stream/onehundredyearsp00flinrich/onehundredyearsp00flinrich_djvu.txt


    'wherever and in whatever capacity they
    [Chinese] have entered a country, they have ere long obtained the ascendancy'

    pg 514-515

    The Chinese will come to us, mainly, like some of the European immigrants, as candidates for filling our more menial positions; they will be house-servants, washermen, rail-road laborers, miners, laborers in the field, &c.

    They have not so generally emigrated to other countries in these humbler capacities; but in Batavia, in Cochin China, in Manchuria, and in Chinese Tartary or Siingaria, wherever and in whatever capacity they have entered a country, they have ere long obtained the ascendancy, compelling the adoption of their language, their habits and customs, and attaining to leading positions in business and influence.

    It is questionable whether they can do so among us. The Western intellect is more vigorous and controlling than the Oriental, and in the end, after perhaps a hundred years of attrition and quiet struggle for the supremacy, the highest Caucasian type of manhood may assert and maintain its superiority over the Mongolian.
     
    , @John Johnson
    @Ivashka the fool

    The Indians are different, they marry more inside the community and their culture is quite lively that is it is still quite energetic.

    Quite energetic? Do you mean they work hard or have an enthusiasm for life?

    Indians are bound by a caste system that says everything is written.

    Hard to be energetic about life when you believe that everything is beyond your control.

    Indians are really some of the most annoying people I have been around. They want to believe they are superior to Whites and this affects even basic interactions. They view American Whites as brutes and India as the original civilization. This leads to insecurities as they try to prove themselves over trivial matters. Someone accurately described this to me as a combination of arrogance and insecurity. They are really a pain in the ass to work with in the office.

  1088. LatW says:
    @Ivashka the fool
    @LatW

    I think you are mostly right here in your (very feminine) observations. I don't think that the extreme Oriental immigrants would breed a lot in their host countries. They wouldn't have more than a couple of kids on average and they will mostly prioritize wealth and career. Interestingly, the Chinese do not seem to be against dating Whites. Both females and males seem to be open minded about metissage. But I think that for cultural and mentality reasons they would mostly marry inside their community. Idon't know about other ethnic groups from Extreme Orient, although I had Corean and Vietnamese contacts while studying and known a female Japanese postdoc who was a (sorry to say that) sexual tourist of sorts, sampling male students of different ethnicities and races, probably just a weird young lady not representative of her country/culture. I have also known a local White who did study in Japan and brought back a fiancée, they have two kids now, though she had a hard time adapting and they nearly split with her going back to Japan.

    The impression that I had, was that I get along easily with these people (I usually do with most people in general), although they certainly have a different way of thinking. They are indeed very materialistic, although they value natural beauty and perhaps beauty in general, at least those whom I known enough to discuss it with them. Those who immigrate to North America with money, there are many of them, are quite self-assured and do not hesitate to take yheir place. Not in the obnoxious FUSSR of Middle Eastern nouveau riche manner, but in a more down to earth practical way. Vancouver is a good example, it is very much Chinese, in some neighborhoods the local Whites are only represented by the heroine addicts sleeping on the street.

    And that's probably the real impact of the Extreme Oriental immigration, they are smart, hard working and relatively often arriving wealthy or hell bent on becoming wealthy. They buy properties, invest in SMEs, and alter the demographics of the neighborhoods where they reside by pricing out the locals. The fact that they breed not more than locals is not really important given that hundreds of millions there are available to do the travel to the West, especially if the Chinese economy slows down. I expect them to significantly alter the economic and demographic balance of North America and Oceania in the next few generations. Although them not being breeders would limit their total impact somewhat. Given that they are not against intermixing and intermarrying with locals, and that their youngsters are susceptible to Western fashions and fads, I think in the long run they will be well integrated into the local population. They already are actually.

    The Indians are different, they marry more inside the community and their culture is quite lively that is it is still quite energetic. They will probably create more or less self-centered communities with not much intermixing with the locals. It is partly due to their religious beliefs and also them still being somewhat tribal and casteist.

    Anyway, these communities are here to stay in the West and their influence should get growing because of them being quite successful. It would certainly influence the West towards a more cultural and spiritual diverse make up. Whether this is good or bad is hard to tell.

    Replies: @LatW, @S, @John Johnson

    though she had a hard time adapting and they nearly split with her going back to Japan.

    That’s tough. Plus the Japanese are very different from other Asians in that they are very attached to their homeland, especially women (who have a hard time being away from home). I don’t think Japanese women should live in the West or among any Whites, because they are just so delicate and refined, I think White society is too rough for them. They are best sheltered at home. I also imagine that the relatively patriarchal relationships that they experience at home in Japan are not as bad as people sometimes make them out to be.

    although they value natural beauty

    Well, this is kind of universal, everyone values natural beauty, but, yes, I have known some who enjoy landscapes, camping, hiking. Overall they have good habits.

    Vancouver is a good example, it is very much Chinese, in some neighborhoods the local Whites are only represented by the heroine addicts sleeping on the street.

    I visited Vancouver several years ago and, yes, it is very Asian, not sure if it’s majority Asian at this point, but I did see some decent looking and well dressed Whites there as well. Most Whites live on the outskirts of Vancouver, in all those suburban areas, the housing costs there are insane. However, the Pacific region of North America has always had strong Asian influences, with Japanese vessels washing up on the coast of the US and Canada in ancient times, with exquisite Japanese gardening and with all kinds of unique cultures such as Aleuts and native seafaring tribes (although those are not Asian, of course), and there is a long history of Chinese presence in places such as San Francisco, but of course these massive new waves of Asian immigrants is something different.

    The Indians can be problematic in that they have traditionally enjoyed partaking in leftist politics. They can be a little too pushy for my taste.

    Of course, these communities will affect the cultural make up of North America, although in the case of Vancouver and other such places, it would not hurt to remember that they were created by the British. These new Chinese arrivals should acknowledge that.

    • Replies: @S
    @LatW


    there is a long history of Chinese presence in places such as San Francisco
     
    Throughout Spain, and then Mexico's,
    long occupation of California, the number of Chinese there had built up to a literal handful of well off seasonal traders whom would often return home to China.

    In contrast, within a few short years of the US conquest, by the 1850's, the number of Chinese in California had skyrocketed into the tens of thousands, the vast majority having been imported in as wage slaves, ie so called 'cheap labor'.


    Of course, these communities will affect the cultural make up of North America, although in the case of Vancouver and other such places, it would not hurt to remember that they were created by the British.
     
    :-)
    , @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms
    @LatW

    Yes but Japanese women are better than white women women at some rough sports 😉

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Olympic_medalists_in_freestyle_wrestling#Women

    Most of your observations about Asians are right on. But low fertility for East Asians is related to existing over-population. That not the case for Euros.

    The kind of "roughness" or assertiveness for northern Euro women is going overboard I'm afraid. Don't get me wrong, I respect it to an extent. Most East Asian girls, especially Chinese, are indeed way too lame and materialistic.

    I just saw that there is a Diane Kruger movie In The Fade about her avenging her Turkish husband against "neo-Nazis" by blowing herself up (I only saw the trailer I couldn't watch the entire thing).

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @LatW

  1089. @Dmitry
    @AP


    urban bourgeoisie were alienated from it, and created something
     
    That is historically illiterate if you are discussing Europe. Most of the traditions and kind of European civilization were created by the burghers after the renaissance. What do you think the famous Italian culture is from?

    Replies: @AP

    Most of the traditions and kind of European civilization were created by the burghers after the renaissance

    Which ones?

    • Replies: @Dmitry
    @AP

    Most of European culture since the renaissance. By far most of the modern European culture and traditions* have been produced by the city residents. In Italy in the republican city states.

    Most of the culture producers of modern Europe have been city workers, mainly merchants' class or artisans below these. Even the most culturally important royal court were originating as city burghers, this is the Medici family. Some of the kitchen traditions are from peasants still today, the direction of the middle class artists were changed by funding by land owners, royal courts and the salons, which were not so culturally fertile themselves.

    There are examples of exception in areas like the Russian empire, where the transnational elite and royal court, are often importing foreign culture, which only small proportion of people have the access codes for entering local modifications or local customization before revolution. With time delay, so Pushkin views imported Byzantine culture as curse in the time it is still interrogated to villagers, while the civilized European words of Pushkin interrogated to villagers only the next century.

    -

    *Italy today still continues the early modern traditions of the republican citizens of the city states.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zCtWidd0vMo.

    Replies: @AP

  1090. @AP
    @Ivashka the fool


    There is a contradiction in what you wrote. On one hand you correctly wrote that the Austro-Hungarian (and Russian) Empire(s) were pre-national, but on the other hand, you write that peasantry was the carriers of the national spirit. If they weren’t a nation, how could they carry a nation’s spirit?
     
    I think it's misunderstanding of terms, and I wasn't clear.

    I contrasted "national spirit" (pre-nationalism) of peasants (ancient traditions, folk ways) and to a lesser extent nobility (more cosmopolitan than peasants, but also with their ancient traditions, and often in an organic relationship with peasants), to nationalism of the bourgeoisie.

    By "national spirit" I meant not ideological nationalism's concept but rather the collective traditions, folkways, way of life, Weltanschauung that had organically developed over hundreds or thousands of years in particular places among particular peoples. Peasants and aristocrats were carriers of that spirit; urban bourgeoisie were alienated from it, and created something approximate.

    In fact, there was no national spirit among the peasant, as well as there was no national spirit among the higher aristocracy.
     
    You are correct, we just used different terms.

    Once these social strata got prevalent and influential enough, they transformed the folkish spirit of the peasants to make them into a nation
     
    Correct. Using the tool of mass literacy.

    Either you have Atlanticist United Europe or an Europe of autonomous and independent nations.
     
    It does not exclude using the former to promote the latter. Particularly if the faces the danger of falling under a Eurasian despotism which is different and better and worse in different ways from the Atlanticism.

    Replies: @Dmitry, @Mr. XYZ

    It does not exclude using the former to promote the latter. Particularly if the faces the danger of falling under a Eurasian despotism which is different and better and worse in different ways from the Atlanticism.

    Worth noting that there is also a middle ground here: A confederation of autonomous and independent European nations. This allows them to be a part of a world-power while still maintaining good amounts of their autonomy and independence in terms of domestic affairs (but not fully, of course).

  1091. @AP
    @Ivashka the fool


    These rioters are not migrants. They were born there, with their parents most probably born there. They are French citizens of legal immigrant descent. Just like your ancestors were immigrants to America, Australia or wherever you live in.
     
    They are born in someone else's homeland, and are behaving as insolent guests.

    They should be expelled, as Europeans were expelled from Africa (even those born there, such as pied noir whose roots in Algeria were deeper than those of these vandals and who had contributed more to their adoptive homeland than these parasites have done).

    Not all of them, but anyone participating in the riots in any way.

    A good thing about these riots is that they highlight to everyone that it is bad to allow non-Europeans to settle in Europe. The Polish PM has already mentioned them. The riots will make it easier for the non-Muslim part of Europe to stay clean and health. In that way they are like a vaccine.

    Problem is, they are very hard, nearly impossible to integrate and assimilate.
     
    All the more reason to remove them.

    Polish PM Morawiecki:

    "Our plan is a Europe of Secure Borders - security and public order - these are the values ​​from which everything else begins!"

    He posts a video contrasting France with peaceful Poland:

    The caption at the end of the video states - "we don't want such scene on Polish streets, safety of Poles above all"



    https://twitter.com/MorawieckiM/status/1674855346387537920?s=20

    Replies: @Anatoly Karlin, @Ivashka the fool, @Mr. XYZ, @Mr. XYZ, @Mr. XYZ, @Gerard1234

    Also, one more thing: I suspect that it’s very possible that the Algerian rebels’ radicalism and brutality towards the pieds-noirs had a lot to do with the general brutality of the Algerian War, in which hundreds of thousands of Algerians (including 150,000 Algerian FLN fighters) got killed. Had Algeria been given its independence peacefully in 1954-1956 along with both Tunisia and Morocco, then it’s possible that the pieds-noirs would have been allowed to stay in Algeria in exchange for them agreeing to take a loyalty oath to Algeria or something like that. Very far from guaranteed, of course, but more likely than in real life due to less Algerian blood being shed beforehand. Though even in such a scenario, most of the pieds-noirs would have likely subsequently fled from Algeria anyway in the 1990s due to the extremely brutal civil war there, unless that war would have somehow been prevented in this scenario. Though maybe some of them would have eventually returned to Algeria in this scenario after things would have calmed and quieted down there in the 21st century.

  1092. @AP
    @Ivashka the fool


    And the aristocracy primary competitors always were the middle class bourgeois which are the carriers of the national spirit.
     
    No. The carriers of the national spirit were the peasantry. The middle class bourgeoisie were the carriers of nationalism.

    There is a difference.

    The bourgeoisie were the enemies of both the peasants and of the aristocracy. They in part cannibalized the spirit of the former as part of their method of brainwashing and organising the masses for the purpose of seizing power from the latter. This was done through mass literacy. The result is that the bourgeoisie took over their nations and then the nations engaged in mutual mass slaughter. Celine very eloquently described this process.

    But in the early stages, in the Vendee, it was bourgeoisie head-choppers/mass killer versus both aristocrats and peasants.

    A nuance in Eastern Europe was that there wasn’t much of a bourgeoisie, so this role was often played by petty gentry. So in Polish Austria the nobles who had become nationalists rebelled against the Hapsburgs. The peasants hadn’t yet become literate however, so they defended the Emperor and slaughtered the rebels.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Mr. Hack, @Coconuts, @Mr. XYZ

    The result is that the bourgeoisie took over their nations and then the nations engaged in mutual mass slaughter.

    Pre-national countries were just as happy to engage in this slaughter as national countries, so what exactly is this supposed to prove?

    • Replies: @AP
    @Mr. XYZ

    You'd have to go centuries back to the Protestant-inspired religious wars to see the level of violence in Europe, that was unleashed by nationalism.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

  1093. S says:
    @Ivashka the fool
    @LatW

    I think you are mostly right here in your (very feminine) observations. I don't think that the extreme Oriental immigrants would breed a lot in their host countries. They wouldn't have more than a couple of kids on average and they will mostly prioritize wealth and career. Interestingly, the Chinese do not seem to be against dating Whites. Both females and males seem to be open minded about metissage. But I think that for cultural and mentality reasons they would mostly marry inside their community. Idon't know about other ethnic groups from Extreme Orient, although I had Corean and Vietnamese contacts while studying and known a female Japanese postdoc who was a (sorry to say that) sexual tourist of sorts, sampling male students of different ethnicities and races, probably just a weird young lady not representative of her country/culture. I have also known a local White who did study in Japan and brought back a fiancée, they have two kids now, though she had a hard time adapting and they nearly split with her going back to Japan.

    The impression that I had, was that I get along easily with these people (I usually do with most people in general), although they certainly have a different way of thinking. They are indeed very materialistic, although they value natural beauty and perhaps beauty in general, at least those whom I known enough to discuss it with them. Those who immigrate to North America with money, there are many of them, are quite self-assured and do not hesitate to take yheir place. Not in the obnoxious FUSSR of Middle Eastern nouveau riche manner, but in a more down to earth practical way. Vancouver is a good example, it is very much Chinese, in some neighborhoods the local Whites are only represented by the heroine addicts sleeping on the street.

    And that's probably the real impact of the Extreme Oriental immigration, they are smart, hard working and relatively often arriving wealthy or hell bent on becoming wealthy. They buy properties, invest in SMEs, and alter the demographics of the neighborhoods where they reside by pricing out the locals. The fact that they breed not more than locals is not really important given that hundreds of millions there are available to do the travel to the West, especially if the Chinese economy slows down. I expect them to significantly alter the economic and demographic balance of North America and Oceania in the next few generations. Although them not being breeders would limit their total impact somewhat. Given that they are not against intermixing and intermarrying with locals, and that their youngsters are susceptible to Western fashions and fads, I think in the long run they will be well integrated into the local population. They already are actually.

    The Indians are different, they marry more inside the community and their culture is quite lively that is it is still quite energetic. They will probably create more or less self-centered communities with not much intermixing with the locals. It is partly due to their religious beliefs and also them still being somewhat tribal and casteist.

    Anyway, these communities are here to stay in the West and their influence should get growing because of them being quite successful. It would certainly influence the West towards a more cultural and spiritual diverse make up. Whether this is good or bad is hard to tell.

    Replies: @LatW, @S, @John Johnson

    I had Corean and Vietnamese contacts while studying and known a female Japanese postdoc who was a (sorry to say that) sexual tourist of sorts, sampling male students of different ethnicities and races, probably just a weird young lady not representative of her country/culture.

    Hmmm, I dunno. I’m certainly far from an expert on the subject, but I’ve heard from more than one ‘open minded Westerner’ that there’s a streak of sexual obsessiveness/fetishizing amongst quite a few Japanese that almost enters into the realm of being a sickness.

    Those [Chinese] who immigrate to North America with money, there are many of them, are quite self-assured and do not hesitate to take yheir place.

    There was a reference book of joint authorship published circa 1870 in the United States that delved deeply into this very subject. They were very bullish on importing Chinese in vast numbers by diktat into the United States and the whole of the Anglosphere, as wage slaves (ie so called ‘cheap labor) at that time. The project ultimately fell through for almost a hundred years (thru 1965) due to frankly righteous resistance.

    This resistance didn’t go nearly far enough in that people such as the author here (LP Brockett MD) should have been removed from all positions of influence (ie this reference book containing his writing here was apparently in many university libraries, and the book should have been removed) and the few tens of thousands of Chinese left in the US after the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 should have been deported. The fanatical so called ‘progressives’ as it was simply used the remaining Chinese as a wedge and as an example of one more ‘oppressed minority’.

    I have a low opinion of people such as Brockett as he (amongst others) with his championing of wage slavery is of the same ilk and mentality as those whom were involved in chattel slavery and it’s trade, and for the very same exact gross immoral reasons.

    https://archive.org/stream/onehundredyearsp00flinrich/onehundredyearsp00flinrich_djvu.txt

    ‘wherever and in whatever capacity they
    [Chinese] have entered a country, they have ere long obtained the ascendancy’

    pg 514-515

    The Chinese will come to us, mainly, like some of the European immigrants, as candidates for filling our more menial positions; they will be house-servants, washermen, rail-road laborers, miners, laborers in the field, &c.

    They have not so generally emigrated to other countries in these humbler capacities; but in Batavia, in Cochin China, in Manchuria, and in Chinese Tartary or Siingaria, wherever and in whatever capacity they have entered a country, they have ere long obtained the ascendancy, compelling the adoption of their language, their habits and customs, and attaining to leading positions in business and influence.

    It is questionable whether they can do so among us. The Western intellect is more vigorous and controlling than the Oriental, and in the end, after perhaps a hundred years of attrition and quiet struggle for the supremacy, the highest Caucasian type of manhood may assert and maintain its superiority over the Mongolian.

  1094. @Ivashka the fool
    @LatW

    I think you are mostly right here in your (very feminine) observations. I don't think that the extreme Oriental immigrants would breed a lot in their host countries. They wouldn't have more than a couple of kids on average and they will mostly prioritize wealth and career. Interestingly, the Chinese do not seem to be against dating Whites. Both females and males seem to be open minded about metissage. But I think that for cultural and mentality reasons they would mostly marry inside their community. Idon't know about other ethnic groups from Extreme Orient, although I had Corean and Vietnamese contacts while studying and known a female Japanese postdoc who was a (sorry to say that) sexual tourist of sorts, sampling male students of different ethnicities and races, probably just a weird young lady not representative of her country/culture. I have also known a local White who did study in Japan and brought back a fiancée, they have two kids now, though she had a hard time adapting and they nearly split with her going back to Japan.

    The impression that I had, was that I get along easily with these people (I usually do with most people in general), although they certainly have a different way of thinking. They are indeed very materialistic, although they value natural beauty and perhaps beauty in general, at least those whom I known enough to discuss it with them. Those who immigrate to North America with money, there are many of them, are quite self-assured and do not hesitate to take yheir place. Not in the obnoxious FUSSR of Middle Eastern nouveau riche manner, but in a more down to earth practical way. Vancouver is a good example, it is very much Chinese, in some neighborhoods the local Whites are only represented by the heroine addicts sleeping on the street.

    And that's probably the real impact of the Extreme Oriental immigration, they are smart, hard working and relatively often arriving wealthy or hell bent on becoming wealthy. They buy properties, invest in SMEs, and alter the demographics of the neighborhoods where they reside by pricing out the locals. The fact that they breed not more than locals is not really important given that hundreds of millions there are available to do the travel to the West, especially if the Chinese economy slows down. I expect them to significantly alter the economic and demographic balance of North America and Oceania in the next few generations. Although them not being breeders would limit their total impact somewhat. Given that they are not against intermixing and intermarrying with locals, and that their youngsters are susceptible to Western fashions and fads, I think in the long run they will be well integrated into the local population. They already are actually.

    The Indians are different, they marry more inside the community and their culture is quite lively that is it is still quite energetic. They will probably create more or less self-centered communities with not much intermixing with the locals. It is partly due to their religious beliefs and also them still being somewhat tribal and casteist.

    Anyway, these communities are here to stay in the West and their influence should get growing because of them being quite successful. It would certainly influence the West towards a more cultural and spiritual diverse make up. Whether this is good or bad is hard to tell.

    Replies: @LatW, @S, @John Johnson

    The Indians are different, they marry more inside the community and their culture is quite lively that is it is still quite energetic.

    Quite energetic? Do you mean they work hard or have an enthusiasm for life?

    Indians are bound by a caste system that says everything is written.

    Hard to be energetic about life when you believe that everything is beyond your control.

    Indians are really some of the most annoying people I have been around. They want to believe they are superior to Whites and this affects even basic interactions. They view American Whites as brutes and India as the original civilization. This leads to insecurities as they try to prove themselves over trivial matters. Someone accurately described this to me as a combination of arrogance and insecurity. They are really a pain in the ass to work with in the office.

  1095. S says:
    @LatW
    @Ivashka the fool


    though she had a hard time adapting and they nearly split with her going back to Japan.
     
    That's tough. Plus the Japanese are very different from other Asians in that they are very attached to their homeland, especially women (who have a hard time being away from home). I don't think Japanese women should live in the West or among any Whites, because they are just so delicate and refined, I think White society is too rough for them. They are best sheltered at home. I also imagine that the relatively patriarchal relationships that they experience at home in Japan are not as bad as people sometimes make them out to be.

    although they value natural beauty
     
    Well, this is kind of universal, everyone values natural beauty, but, yes, I have known some who enjoy landscapes, camping, hiking. Overall they have good habits.

    Vancouver is a good example, it is very much Chinese, in some neighborhoods the local Whites are only represented by the heroine addicts sleeping on the street.
     
    I visited Vancouver several years ago and, yes, it is very Asian, not sure if it's majority Asian at this point, but I did see some decent looking and well dressed Whites there as well. Most Whites live on the outskirts of Vancouver, in all those suburban areas, the housing costs there are insane. However, the Pacific region of North America has always had strong Asian influences, with Japanese vessels washing up on the coast of the US and Canada in ancient times, with exquisite Japanese gardening and with all kinds of unique cultures such as Aleuts and native seafaring tribes (although those are not Asian, of course), and there is a long history of Chinese presence in places such as San Francisco, but of course these massive new waves of Asian immigrants is something different.

    The Indians can be problematic in that they have traditionally enjoyed partaking in leftist politics. They can be a little too pushy for my taste.

    Of course, these communities will affect the cultural make up of North America, although in the case of Vancouver and other such places, it would not hurt to remember that they were created by the British. These new Chinese arrivals should acknowledge that.

    Replies: @S, @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    there is a long history of Chinese presence in places such as San Francisco

    Throughout Spain, and then Mexico's,
    long occupation of California, the number of Chinese there had built up to a literal handful of well off seasonal traders whom would often return home to China.

    In contrast, within a few short years of the US conquest, by the 1850's, the number of Chinese in California had skyrocketed into the tens of thousands, the vast majority having been imported in as wage slaves, ie so called 'cheap labor'.

    Of course, these communities will affect the cultural make up of North America, although in the case of Vancouver and other such places, it would not hurt to remember that they were created by the British.

    🙂

  1096. @LatW
    @YetAnotherAnon


    The problem was that the people in Donbass and Luhansk (not to mention Crimea) didn’t want be be part of Ukraine after the 2014 revolution/coup, inspired by the US.
     
    There was a foreign intervention there. Also, some of the people were saying things like "Путин введи войска!" (Putin, bring in the troops!), openly agitating for an invasion by a hostile (and much larger) state. If this was happening in your own country, would you be ok with that? Of course, not.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @YetAnotherAnon

    “There was a foreign intervention there. “

    We all know about Nuland.

    By contrast, the peoples of the Donbass and Luhansk were begging for Russian intervention for seven years until 2022, when the Ukr military buildup and increase in shelling finally caused Russia to act.

    To be fair to Russia, they’d probably spent that time sanction-proofing their economy.

    Distressing footage here of the Ukrainian army in Mariupol, 2014, using guns on civilians and tanks on the local police.

    https://t.me/llordofwar/167950

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @YetAnotherAnon

    Russia would have been better off quickly annexing the Donbass but not touching the rest of Ukraine. 2022 was less optimal to do this than back in 2014, but still possible.

  1097. @Mr. XYZ
    @AP


    The result is that the bourgeoisie took over their nations and then the nations engaged in mutual mass slaughter.
     
    Pre-national countries were just as happy to engage in this slaughter as national countries, so what exactly is this supposed to prove?

    Replies: @AP

    You’d have to go centuries back to the Protestant-inspired religious wars to see the level of violence in Europe, that was unleashed by nationalism.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @AP

    I think that a part of the reason why nationalism-inspired wars were so bloody was due to the evolution of technology making mass killing (both on and off the battlefield) much easier.

    Also, pre-nationalist Europe had other long and bloody wars, such as the Italian Wars, the War of the Spanish Succession, the War of the Austrian Succession, and the Seven Years' War. They might not have been as bloody per capita as the World Wars, or as the Thirty Years' War, but they were probably still pretty bloody, especially considering that they lasted for a while and involved a lot of countries. And you might as well also include the Hundred Years' War here, though that war was more limited--only between the English and French royal dynasties. It lasted on-and-off for over 100 years, though.

    BTW, you consider the French Revolutionary Wars and Napoleonic Wars to both be nationalism-inspired wars, right?

  1098. @AP
    @Mr. XYZ

    You'd have to go centuries back to the Protestant-inspired religious wars to see the level of violence in Europe, that was unleashed by nationalism.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    I think that a part of the reason why nationalism-inspired wars were so bloody was due to the evolution of technology making mass killing (both on and off the battlefield) much easier.

    Also, pre-nationalist Europe had other long and bloody wars, such as the Italian Wars, the War of the Spanish Succession, the War of the Austrian Succession, and the Seven Years’ War. They might not have been as bloody per capita as the World Wars, or as the Thirty Years’ War, but they were probably still pretty bloody, especially considering that they lasted for a while and involved a lot of countries. And you might as well also include the Hundred Years’ War here, though that war was more limited–only between the English and French royal dynasties. It lasted on-and-off for over 100 years, though.

    BTW, you consider the French Revolutionary Wars and Napoleonic Wars to both be nationalism-inspired wars, right?

  1099. @YetAnotherAnon
    @LatW

    "There was a foreign intervention there. "

    We all know about Nuland.

    By contrast, the peoples of the Donbass and Luhansk were begging for Russian intervention for seven years until 2022, when the Ukr military buildup and increase in shelling finally caused Russia to act.

    To be fair to Russia, they'd probably spent that time sanction-proofing their economy.

    Distressing footage here of the Ukrainian army in Mariupol, 2014, using guns on civilians and tanks on the local police.

    https://t.me/llordofwar/167950

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    Russia would have been better off quickly annexing the Donbass but not touching the rest of Ukraine. 2022 was less optimal to do this than back in 2014, but still possible.

  1100. @LatW
    @Ivashka the fool


    Younger generation Extreme Orientals are very individualistic. I have known a few among them, those who I have known were very hard working and talented, but they were indeed not very family oriented. They were also very materialistic.
     
    Yes, they do have some appealing qualities, they're mellow and non-confrontational. The younger women and men are very easy and pleasant to be around, the older women can at times be a bit difficult (they can be strangely conformist and rigid, yet occasionally "bossy" all at the same time but I would chalk it up to the daily stresses they endure in that age group, not their ethnic background).

    However, the Chinese in particular are very driven, very status oriented, but very rigid. The women are highly materialistic. I don't know much about their relationship dynamic, but I see a lot of single women who are in no rush to become moms (and with the kind of career choices they've made they probably couldn't even fit it in).

    The older UMC educated Chinese women either don't have kids or have one, I knew a very nice young Hapa man whose mother is an educated and highly organized woman from Hong Kong, and she's struggling with her son (who, while very attractive, mild mannered and cultivated, also has mental issues and wants to be a kind of a "dark" artist, which is pretty cool but this won't make him some robust family man in the future - that's a second gen Asian for you). I just don't see how most of these ambitious younger Chinese women who speak bad English but are still paid a lot because they overachieve, how they're going to have a sufficient number of kids. When these women get older and move into their overpriced homes, I wonder if they're still going to be compelled to vote for high-taxation parties such as the Democrat party. Some probably will (those who are employed in the public sector), but maybe not all of them.


    But they are not as hedonist as the postmodern younger Whites are.
     
    Depends on what one means by "hedonist". Frankly, they are overall just nerdier (which in and of itself isn't bad, but they lack creativity, quirkiness, originality and sex appeal, with few exceptions - again, I don't want to be too judgmental here, they don't have to be that way to be good people, they are good bees in the hive). They are overall less creative (with the exception of Japanese) so less bohemian, but they do indulge in materialism.

    As to younger Whites, they are different - some are of course out of control, but many young Whites are actually more chaste than the previous generations (especially Boomers and Gen X, many of whom were totally out of control). So there may have been a backlash to some extent (or something has changed in the culture). Maybe not enough to make a difference but it is noticeable. They are still somewhat spoiled, but at least some of them are looking for healthy solutions and some are looking for ways away from the mainstream culture.

    They are not necessarily trad or family oriented, but they are not loose either. They prioritize education, life experiences, "causes", for some of the younger women I know, I feel that they see avoiding (the bad kind of) "hedonism" as necessary for the sake of their physical and mental health, which is a very healthy instinct. Or they have taken their hedonism away from more destructive things and moved towards things such as art, travel or experiences. Eventually they will have families, just not very large ones. Some working class Whites are still having quite a few kids.


    Indians seem more family oriented, more involved with their community and more clanish.
     
    Indians are indeed slightly more family oriented, but even they no longer have that many kids. The H1B software guys will stay single for a long time. The younger women who are now having decent careers with tech startups will most likely not go on to become "submissive wives" and will not prioritize family any time soon. That said, there is such an enormous number of them, that they could keep arriving into the US and Europe for years, if not decades to come. The good thing about them is they are not violent.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Mr. XYZ

    Indians are indeed slightly more family oriented, but even they no longer have that many kids. The H1B software guys will stay single for a long time. The younger women who are now having decent careers with tech startups will most likely not go on to become “submissive wives” and will not prioritize family any time soon. That said, there is such an enormous number of them, that they could keep arriving into the US and Europe for years, if not decades to come. The good thing about them is they are not violent.

    Worth noting that the Indians in the US are considerably more elite than the Indians in Europe are:

    https://jsmp.dk/posts/2019-09-26-braindrain/immigration.html

    Though Indians in Europe are still more elite than Muslims in Europe are. In turn, unsurprisingly, Europe has much more problems with Muslims than with Indians.

    • Replies: @LatW
    @Mr. XYZ

    And what exactly is good about "Indians being in the elite"?

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

  1101. @Mr. XYZ
    @LatW


    Indians are indeed slightly more family oriented, but even they no longer have that many kids. The H1B software guys will stay single for a long time. The younger women who are now having decent careers with tech startups will most likely not go on to become “submissive wives” and will not prioritize family any time soon. That said, there is such an enormous number of them, that they could keep arriving into the US and Europe for years, if not decades to come. The good thing about them is they are not violent.

     

    Worth noting that the Indians in the US are considerably more elite than the Indians in Europe are:

    https://jsmp.dk/posts/2019-09-26-braindrain/immigration.html

    https://jsmp.dk/posts/2019-09-26-braindrain/images/2.png

    Though Indians in Europe are still more elite than Muslims in Europe are. In turn, unsurprisingly, Europe has much more problems with Muslims than with Indians.

    Replies: @LatW

    And what exactly is good about “Indians being in the elite”?

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @LatW

    They are more productive. Though on the negative side, some of them can become a part of a hostile overclass.

    Replies: @LatW

  1102. @AP
    @Ivashka the fool


    These rioters are not migrants. They were born there, with their parents most probably born there. They are French citizens of legal immigrant descent. Just like your ancestors were immigrants to America, Australia or wherever you live in.
     
    They are born in someone else's homeland, and are behaving as insolent guests.

    They should be expelled, as Europeans were expelled from Africa (even those born there, such as pied noir whose roots in Algeria were deeper than those of these vandals and who had contributed more to their adoptive homeland than these parasites have done).

    Not all of them, but anyone participating in the riots in any way.

    A good thing about these riots is that they highlight to everyone that it is bad to allow non-Europeans to settle in Europe. The Polish PM has already mentioned them. The riots will make it easier for the non-Muslim part of Europe to stay clean and health. In that way they are like a vaccine.

    Problem is, they are very hard, nearly impossible to integrate and assimilate.
     
    All the more reason to remove them.

    Polish PM Morawiecki:

    "Our plan is a Europe of Secure Borders - security and public order - these are the values ​​from which everything else begins!"

    He posts a video contrasting France with peaceful Poland:

    The caption at the end of the video states - "we don't want such scene on Polish streets, safety of Poles above all"



    https://twitter.com/MorawieckiM/status/1674855346387537920?s=20

    Replies: @Anatoly Karlin, @Ivashka the fool, @Mr. XYZ, @Mr. XYZ, @Mr. XYZ, @Gerard1234

    Wow – the levels of horseshit from this fantasist liar are increasing every day. Ukrops have killed more Poles in about 3 days during WW2, than Algerians have killed French in 200 years you dumbfuck. LMAO. Thats including wars, gang violence, any type of criminality causing murder……even high calory Algerian food. Its constantly proved that these two groups of dickheads (Poles and Galician non-citizens) can’t live together you prick.

    Maybe ukronazi scum have killed more Poles in 3 hours than Algerians have killed French in 200 years is more accurate. The ratio is even more extreme if we are only talking about civilians…..particularly women, children and the elderly.

    For this Polish PM idiot to say that is disgraceful, and the point retarded…….its a non-entity useless country falsely equivalating its failures into successes, by judging itself on the western standards it cant and won’t ever achieve. Like Mauritanians claiming their aerospace industry , or the maintenance part of it, is much superior to America’s because they have much less helicopter crashes each year.

    A good thing about these riots is that they highlight to everyone that it is bad to allow non-Europeans to settle in Europe. The Polish PM has already mentioned them. The riots will make it easier for the non-Muslim part of Europe to stay clean and health. In that way they are like a vaccine.

    A good thing about these riots is that they highlight to everyone that it is bad to allow non-Europeans to settle in Europe. The Polish PM has already mentioned them. The riots will make it easier for the non-Muslim part of Europe to stay clean and health. In that way they are like a vaccine.

    We have this scumbag “AP” talking about people and places he knows absolutely zero about – Poland, 404, Russia…….must the readers on this blog have to read this dumb sack of shit talking about Algerians?

    Anyway, except for the fact you have f**k all experiance to talk about anything European……Algerians do at least have a middle class in France, many intellectuals, have held big government positions. Ukronazi slave retards under Polish rule, are either toilet cleaners and mass whores ( though the countries with Albanians are “superior” to the Poles in this) like now……or just as bad slaves historicallu who literally make the Samuel L Jackson character in the film Django Unchained, look a huge aspiration for ukrops in Galicia at the time

    • Replies: @AP
    @Gerard1234

    You are unwanted guest just like those rioting Algerians in France; you defend them because they are your peers. Of course you are worse then them, they were born in France, whereas you are a filthy Sovok untermensch who chose to pollute England with your presence. Go home. They have flights through Serbia or Turkey.


    Ukronazi slave retards under Polish rule, are either toilet cleaners and mass whores
     
    The typical Sovok obsession with prostitutes. It's what you people know best. It's what you do.

    When you write that about Ukraine you are just admitting that Donbass is Ukraine.

    Algerians do at least have a middle class in France, many intellectuals, have held big government positions
     
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gr%C3%A9goire_Orlyk

    Grégoire Orlyk, also Hryhor Orlyk (Ukrainian: Григор Пилипович Орлик,[1] November 5, 1702, Baturyn – November 14, 1759, Minden), was a French military commander, special envoy and member of Louis XV's secret intelligence service. Grégoire Orlyk was born in Ukraine, the son of Ukrainian hetman in exile Pylyp Orlyk and Hanna Hertsyk. He received a good education in Sweden, served in Poland and Saxony, and participated in the secret efforts of France to restore Stanisław Leszczyński to the Polish throne. He later commanded the king's regiment of Royal suedois. For his intelligence work and military exploits he was given the title of comte and promoted to the general's rank of Maréchal de camp. Grégoire Orlyk was an acquaintance of the French philosopher Voltaire, and championed the Ukrainian cause in France and other countries.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @QCIC

  1103. @LatW
    @Mr. XYZ

    And what exactly is good about "Indians being in the elite"?

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    They are more productive. Though on the negative side, some of them can become a part of a hostile overclass.

    • Replies: @LatW
    @Mr. XYZ


    They are more productive.
     
    I'm not sure they're necessarily more productive. Most of them are mediocre. Even if they were super productive, that's not a reason to flood Europe with them.

    Danes are very productive (four day work week).

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

  1104. @Mr. XYZ
    @LatW

    They are more productive. Though on the negative side, some of them can become a part of a hostile overclass.

    Replies: @LatW

    They are more productive.

    I’m not sure they’re necessarily more productive. Most of them are mediocre. Even if they were super productive, that’s not a reason to flood Europe with them.

    Danes are very productive (four day work week).

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @LatW

    Well, it's too bad that there are many more smart Indians than smart Danes, even adjusting for India's much lower average IQ (which is likely significantly depressed by environmental factors which don't affect Indians' descendants after they move to the West).

    As for flooding Europe with Indians, my own view is that each European country should figure this out for itself. Some prefer more generous policies and others more restrictive policies. It's quite interesting that recent Indian migrants to Europe are much more productive than the Indian-descended Roma are. The Roma are a strongly disliked underclass in Eastern Europe, I would presume.

    I suppose that liberal Westerners could be delighted in maximizing the West's research and scientific output by accepting as many smart Third World immigrants as possible. Though this is primarily an issue outside of Eastern Europe, which doesn't produce that much elite science or spend that much on R & D.

    Replies: @LatW

  1105. @LatW
    @Mr. XYZ


    They are more productive.
     
    I'm not sure they're necessarily more productive. Most of them are mediocre. Even if they were super productive, that's not a reason to flood Europe with them.

    Danes are very productive (four day work week).

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    Well, it’s too bad that there are many more smart Indians than smart Danes, even adjusting for India’s much lower average IQ (which is likely significantly depressed by environmental factors which don’t affect Indians’ descendants after they move to the West).

    As for flooding Europe with Indians, my own view is that each European country should figure this out for itself. Some prefer more generous policies and others more restrictive policies. It’s quite interesting that recent Indian migrants to Europe are much more productive than the Indian-descended Roma are. The Roma are a strongly disliked underclass in Eastern Europe, I would presume.

    I suppose that liberal Westerners could be delighted in maximizing the West’s research and scientific output by accepting as many smart Third World immigrants as possible. Though this is primarily an issue outside of Eastern Europe, which doesn’t produce that much elite science or spend that much on R & D.

    • Replies: @LatW
    @Mr. XYZ


    As for flooding Europe with Indians, my own view is that each European country should figure this out for itself.
     
    This is not such a good idea because all of the EU is interconnected, there is freedom of movement. So, no, this should probably be reconsidered. But that goes to the very fundamentals of the EU.

    The Roma are a strongly disliked underclass in Eastern Europe, I would presume.
     
    The Roma should be left alone and not compared to others. Some Roma do quite well, btw, and they are also good singers. They can have nice vibratos.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

  1106. LatW says:
    @Mr. XYZ
    @LatW

    Well, it's too bad that there are many more smart Indians than smart Danes, even adjusting for India's much lower average IQ (which is likely significantly depressed by environmental factors which don't affect Indians' descendants after they move to the West).

    As for flooding Europe with Indians, my own view is that each European country should figure this out for itself. Some prefer more generous policies and others more restrictive policies. It's quite interesting that recent Indian migrants to Europe are much more productive than the Indian-descended Roma are. The Roma are a strongly disliked underclass in Eastern Europe, I would presume.

    I suppose that liberal Westerners could be delighted in maximizing the West's research and scientific output by accepting as many smart Third World immigrants as possible. Though this is primarily an issue outside of Eastern Europe, which doesn't produce that much elite science or spend that much on R & D.

    Replies: @LatW

    As for flooding Europe with Indians, my own view is that each European country should figure this out for itself.

    This is not such a good idea because all of the EU is interconnected, there is freedom of movement. So, no, this should probably be reconsidered. But that goes to the very fundamentals of the EU.

    The Roma are a strongly disliked underclass in Eastern Europe, I would presume.

    The Roma should be left alone and not compared to others. Some Roma do quite well, btw, and they are also good singers. They can have nice vibratos.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @LatW


    This is not such a good idea because all of the EU is interconnected, there is freedom of movement. So, no, this should probably be reconsidered. But that goes to the very fundamentals of the EU.
     
    I don't think that many Indians would prefer Eastern Europe to Western Europe, though. So, freedom of movement within the EU won't bring hordes of Indians to Eastern Europe.

    The Roma should be left alone and not compared to others. Some Roma do quite well, btw, and they are also good singers. They can have nice vibratos.

     

    Interesting. I was basing my statement above on Eastern Europeans discriminating against them:

    https://www.cnn.com/2022/08/07/europe/ukraine-roma-refugees-intl-cmd/index.html

    https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/odr/roma-refugees-ukraine-hungary-discrimination/

    Replies: @LatW

  1107. @LatW
    @Mr. XYZ


    As for flooding Europe with Indians, my own view is that each European country should figure this out for itself.
     
    This is not such a good idea because all of the EU is interconnected, there is freedom of movement. So, no, this should probably be reconsidered. But that goes to the very fundamentals of the EU.

    The Roma are a strongly disliked underclass in Eastern Europe, I would presume.
     
    The Roma should be left alone and not compared to others. Some Roma do quite well, btw, and they are also good singers. They can have nice vibratos.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    This is not such a good idea because all of the EU is interconnected, there is freedom of movement. So, no, this should probably be reconsidered. But that goes to the very fundamentals of the EU.

    I don’t think that many Indians would prefer Eastern Europe to Western Europe, though. So, freedom of movement within the EU won’t bring hordes of Indians to Eastern Europe.

    The Roma should be left alone and not compared to others. Some Roma do quite well, btw, and they are also good singers. They can have nice vibratos.

    Interesting. I was basing my statement above on Eastern Europeans discriminating against them:

    https://www.cnn.com/2022/08/07/europe/ukraine-roma-refugees-intl-cmd/index.html

    https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/odr/roma-refugees-ukraine-hungary-discrimination/

    • Replies: @LatW
    @Mr. XYZ


    I don’t think that many Indians would prefer Eastern Europe to Western Europe, though.
     
    Of course, most of them want to bail to Western Europe and only use Eastern Europe as a trampoline, but there is a certain percentage who want to stay and it is not that low (don't have the exact number but it could be anywhere from 10-30%, which is A LOT!).

    So, freedom of movement within the EU won’t bring hordes of Indians to Eastern Europe.

     

    At some point in the distant future, the freedom of movement could become an issue that might have to be renegotiated. But that's speculative. The fundamentals of the EU should be protected, but they should not be abused by importing masses of non-Europeans.

    Interesting. I was basing my statement above on Eastern Europeans discriminating against them
     
    In Hungary and Ukraine, things are worse for them than in the Baltic states. We had a work program for them and some of them chose to work. Some of them are mixed, so there would be people who are part Gypsy and they can be talented musicians, for example. They're not that bad, some of them are stealthy though so you have to be careful. When some of them sell weed, it's not that problematic, but when it's something heavier then it's not that great.

    It is sad that those Gypsies fleeing Ukraine encounter hardship, they shouldn't leave Western Ukraine which is peaceful, best for them is to live in their home village or their tabor.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

  1108. @AP
    @Dmitry


    Most of the traditions and kind of European civilization were created by the burghers after the renaissance
     
    Which ones?

    Replies: @Dmitry

    Most of European culture since the renaissance. By far most of the modern European culture and traditions* have been produced by the city residents. In Italy in the republican city states.

    Most of the culture producers of modern Europe have been city workers, mainly merchants’ class or artisans below these. Even the most culturally important royal court were originating as city burghers, this is the Medici family. Some of the kitchen traditions are from peasants still today, the direction of the middle class artists were changed by funding by land owners, royal courts and the salons, which were not so culturally fertile themselves.

    There are examples of exception in areas like the Russian empire, where the transnational elite and royal court, are often importing foreign culture, which only small proportion of people have the access codes for entering local modifications or local customization before revolution. With time delay, so Pushkin views imported Byzantine culture as curse in the time it is still interrogated to villagers, while the civilized European words of Pushkin interrogated to villagers only the next century.

    *Italy today still continues the early modern traditions of the republican citizens of the city states.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zCtWidd0vMo.

    • Replies: @AP
    @Dmitry

    I wasn't discussing High Culture, though (which was often sponsored by the aristocracy).

  1109. LatW says:
    @Mr. XYZ
    @LatW


    This is not such a good idea because all of the EU is interconnected, there is freedom of movement. So, no, this should probably be reconsidered. But that goes to the very fundamentals of the EU.
     
    I don't think that many Indians would prefer Eastern Europe to Western Europe, though. So, freedom of movement within the EU won't bring hordes of Indians to Eastern Europe.

    The Roma should be left alone and not compared to others. Some Roma do quite well, btw, and they are also good singers. They can have nice vibratos.

     

    Interesting. I was basing my statement above on Eastern Europeans discriminating against them:

    https://www.cnn.com/2022/08/07/europe/ukraine-roma-refugees-intl-cmd/index.html

    https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/odr/roma-refugees-ukraine-hungary-discrimination/

    Replies: @LatW

    I don’t think that many Indians would prefer Eastern Europe to Western Europe, though.

    Of course, most of them want to bail to Western Europe and only use Eastern Europe as a trampoline, but there is a certain percentage who want to stay and it is not that low (don’t have the exact number but it could be anywhere from 10-30%, which is A LOT!).

    So, freedom of movement within the EU won’t bring hordes of Indians to Eastern Europe.

    At some point in the distant future, the freedom of movement could become an issue that might have to be renegotiated. But that’s speculative. The fundamentals of the EU should be protected, but they should not be abused by importing masses of non-Europeans.

    Interesting. I was basing my statement above on Eastern Europeans discriminating against them

    In Hungary and Ukraine, things are worse for them than in the Baltic states. We had a work program for them and some of them chose to work. Some of them are mixed, so there would be people who are part Gypsy and they can be talented musicians, for example. They’re not that bad, some of them are stealthy though so you have to be careful. When some of them sell weed, it’s not that problematic, but when it’s something heavier then it’s not that great.

    It is sad that those Gypsies fleeing Ukraine encounter hardship, they shouldn’t leave Western Ukraine which is peaceful, best for them is to live in their home village or their tabor.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @LatW


    Of course, most of them want to bail to Western Europe and only use Eastern Europe as a trampoline, but there is a certain percentage who want to stay and it is not that low (don’t have the exact number but it could be anywhere from 10-30%, which is A LOT!).

     

    You'll get more and better Indian food as a result of this. ;)

    At some point in the distant future, the freedom of movement could become an issue that might have to be renegotiated. But that’s speculative. The fundamentals of the EU should be protected, but they should not be abused by importing masses of non-Europeans.
     
    Not even those who are capable of becoming honorary Westerners and improving the West?

    In Hungary and Ukraine, things are worse for them than in the Baltic states. We had a work program for them and some of them chose to work. Some of them are mixed, so there would be people who are part Gypsy and they can be talented musicians, for example. They’re not that bad, some of them are stealthy though so you have to be careful. When some of them sell weed, it’s not that problematic, but when it’s something heavier then it’s not that great.

    It is sad that those Gypsies fleeing Ukraine encounter hardship, they shouldn’t leave Western Ukraine which is peaceful, best for them is to live in their home village or their tabor.
     
    When we visited Russia back in 2004 a Gypsy boy tried to steal my younger sibling's ball. He failed.

    It was the kind of ball that was attached to one's finger, but looked differently from this one:

    https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/61jSr7P0VFL._AC_UF350,350_QL80_.jpg

    Anyway, apparently Roma have a very low average IQ:

    https://www.unz.com/jthompson/gypsy-intelligence/

    I do wonder if environmental factors depress it, though.

    And they were apparently more productive under Communism in Hungary than they are in Hungary right now:

    https://www.unz.com/isteve/gypsy-facts/

    I'm glad that they're fitting in better in the Baltics! :)

    Replies: @LatW

  1110. @LatW
    @Dmitry


    Cities like Manchester and Buenos Aires were a center of world capitalism in the 19th century, they inherit luxury architecture.
     
    But this is wonderful. All the different cultural layers of the city, from different eras, are still there.

    The 19th century industrial heritage, in some cities one can still see it, and even if it is gone, one can still feel it, even if old industrial neighborhoods have gentrified, there is a cool atmosphere, I like it when they remodel old factories and house boutique businesses and lofts there, of course, it's sad that those are no longer working factories, but it is a cozy urban environment with a tinge of history.


    In comparison, Dublin was a poor economy in the 19th century and has so many of the small, boring buildings, nonimpressive architecture.
     
    Dublin has Georgian buildings, although I do not find those all that impressive - I'm used to more luxurious and lavish architectural styles. Dublin's main attraction is the Temple Bar district, rich in character and cozy, even if architecturally not that spectacular. Dublin's forte is not architecture, but it's warm, welcoming atmosphere.

    Replies: @Dmitry

    main attraction is the Temple Bar district,

    It’s architecturally good, but it’s a small portion of the city. I used to live even quite near there. But in our area, it was the 21st century square boxes.

    Some people say going to Dublin is like going to a labor camp. Although I view there predictably as a very nostalgic city now.

    19th century industrial heritage, in some cities one can still see it, and even if it is gone, one can still feel it, even if old industrial neighborhoods

    The red color 19th century buildings where people like Engels were.

    But their startup boom looks like it is planting a lot of the “Dublin 21st century square boxes”

  1111. @Dmitry
    @AP

    Most of European culture since the renaissance. By far most of the modern European culture and traditions* have been produced by the city residents. In Italy in the republican city states.

    Most of the culture producers of modern Europe have been city workers, mainly merchants' class or artisans below these. Even the most culturally important royal court were originating as city burghers, this is the Medici family. Some of the kitchen traditions are from peasants still today, the direction of the middle class artists were changed by funding by land owners, royal courts and the salons, which were not so culturally fertile themselves.

    There are examples of exception in areas like the Russian empire, where the transnational elite and royal court, are often importing foreign culture, which only small proportion of people have the access codes for entering local modifications or local customization before revolution. With time delay, so Pushkin views imported Byzantine culture as curse in the time it is still interrogated to villagers, while the civilized European words of Pushkin interrogated to villagers only the next century.

    -

    *Italy today still continues the early modern traditions of the republican citizens of the city states.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zCtWidd0vMo.

    Replies: @AP

    I wasn’t discussing High Culture, though (which was often sponsored by the aristocracy).

  1112. AP says:
    @Gerard1234
    @AP

    Wow - the levels of horseshit from this fantasist liar are increasing every day. Ukrops have killed more Poles in about 3 days during WW2, than Algerians have killed French in 200 years you dumbfuck. LMAO. Thats including wars, gang violence, any type of criminality causing murder......even high calory Algerian food. Its constantly proved that these two groups of dickheads (Poles and Galician non-citizens) can't live together you prick.

    Maybe ukronazi scum have killed more Poles in 3 hours than Algerians have killed French in 200 years is more accurate. The ratio is even more extreme if we are only talking about civilians.....particularly women, children and the elderly.

    For this Polish PM idiot to say that is disgraceful, and the point retarded.......its a non-entity useless country falsely equivalating its failures into successes, by judging itself on the western standards it cant and won't ever achieve. Like Mauritanians claiming their aerospace industry , or the maintenance part of it, is much superior to America's because they have much less helicopter crashes each year.


    A good thing about these riots is that they highlight to everyone that it is bad to allow non-Europeans to settle in Europe. The Polish PM has already mentioned them. The riots will make it easier for the non-Muslim part of Europe to stay clean and health. In that way they are like a vaccine.

    A good thing about these riots is that they highlight to everyone that it is bad to allow non-Europeans to settle in Europe. The Polish PM has already mentioned them. The riots will make it easier for the non-Muslim part of Europe to stay clean and health. In that way they are like a vaccine.
     
    We have this scumbag "AP" talking about people and places he knows absolutely zero about - Poland, 404, Russia.......must the readers on this blog have to read this dumb sack of shit talking about Algerians?

    Anyway, except for the fact you have f**k all experiance to talk about anything European......Algerians do at least have a middle class in France, many intellectuals, have held big government positions. Ukronazi slave retards under Polish rule, are either toilet cleaners and mass whores ( though the countries with Albanians are "superior" to the Poles in this) like now......or just as bad slaves historicallu who literally make the Samuel L Jackson character in the film Django Unchained, look a huge aspiration for ukrops in Galicia at the time

    Replies: @AP

    You are unwanted guest just like those rioting Algerians in France; you defend them because they are your peers. Of course you are worse then them, they were born in France, whereas you are a filthy Sovok untermensch who chose to pollute England with your presence. Go home. They have flights through Serbia or Turkey.

    Ukronazi slave retards under Polish rule, are either toilet cleaners and mass whores

    The typical Sovok obsession with prostitutes. It’s what you people know best. It’s what you do.

    When you write that about Ukraine you are just admitting that Donbass is Ukraine.

    Algerians do at least have a middle class in France, many intellectuals, have held big government positions

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gr%C3%A9goire_Orlyk

    Grégoire Orlyk, also Hryhor Orlyk (Ukrainian: Григор Пилипович Орлик,[1] November 5, 1702, Baturyn – November 14, 1759, Minden), was a French military commander, special envoy and member of Louis XV’s secret intelligence service. Grégoire Orlyk was born in Ukraine, the son of Ukrainian hetman in exile Pylyp Orlyk and Hanna Hertsyk. He received a good education in Sweden, served in Poland and Saxony, and participated in the secret efforts of France to restore Stanisław Leszczyński to the Polish throne. He later commanded the king’s regiment of Royal suedois. For his intelligence work and military exploits he was given the title of comte and promoted to the general’s rank of Maréchal de camp. Grégoire Orlyk was an acquaintance of the French philosopher Voltaire, and championed the Ukrainian cause in France and other countries.

    • Thanks: Mr. XYZ
    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @AP

    Sovoks can be awfully bitter, no?

    , @QCIC
    @AP

    Gerard1234 plays a crucial role calling bullshit on the often subtle factual errors woven into comments from AP and Hack. This has proven to be the case hundreds of times, where the Ukie backers are mistaken or let their enthusiasm get the best of them or even more importantly when they weave a misleading tapestry on some point or another.

    This interplay is very helpful, thanks to all.


  1113. Has Anatoly ever had a woman in his life?

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @talkative

    This is the kind of pussy that Anatoly prefers to stroke lol:

    https://images.unsplash.com/photo-1606425270259-998c37268501?ixlib=rb-4.0.3&ixid=M3wxMjA3fDB8MHxzZWFyY2h8MXx8cHVzc3ljYXR8ZW58MHx8MHx8fDA%3D&w=1000&q=80

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @RadicalCenter

  1114. @AP
    @Gerard1234

    You are unwanted guest just like those rioting Algerians in France; you defend them because they are your peers. Of course you are worse then them, they were born in France, whereas you are a filthy Sovok untermensch who chose to pollute England with your presence. Go home. They have flights through Serbia or Turkey.


    Ukronazi slave retards under Polish rule, are either toilet cleaners and mass whores
     
    The typical Sovok obsession with prostitutes. It's what you people know best. It's what you do.

    When you write that about Ukraine you are just admitting that Donbass is Ukraine.

    Algerians do at least have a middle class in France, many intellectuals, have held big government positions
     
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gr%C3%A9goire_Orlyk

    Grégoire Orlyk, also Hryhor Orlyk (Ukrainian: Григор Пилипович Орлик,[1] November 5, 1702, Baturyn – November 14, 1759, Minden), was a French military commander, special envoy and member of Louis XV's secret intelligence service. Grégoire Orlyk was born in Ukraine, the son of Ukrainian hetman in exile Pylyp Orlyk and Hanna Hertsyk. He received a good education in Sweden, served in Poland and Saxony, and participated in the secret efforts of France to restore Stanisław Leszczyński to the Polish throne. He later commanded the king's regiment of Royal suedois. For his intelligence work and military exploits he was given the title of comte and promoted to the general's rank of Maréchal de camp. Grégoire Orlyk was an acquaintance of the French philosopher Voltaire, and championed the Ukrainian cause in France and other countries.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @QCIC

    Sovoks can be awfully bitter, no?

  1115. @LatW
    @Mr. XYZ


    I don’t think that many Indians would prefer Eastern Europe to Western Europe, though.
     
    Of course, most of them want to bail to Western Europe and only use Eastern Europe as a trampoline, but there is a certain percentage who want to stay and it is not that low (don't have the exact number but it could be anywhere from 10-30%, which is A LOT!).

    So, freedom of movement within the EU won’t bring hordes of Indians to Eastern Europe.

     

    At some point in the distant future, the freedom of movement could become an issue that might have to be renegotiated. But that's speculative. The fundamentals of the EU should be protected, but they should not be abused by importing masses of non-Europeans.

    Interesting. I was basing my statement above on Eastern Europeans discriminating against them
     
    In Hungary and Ukraine, things are worse for them than in the Baltic states. We had a work program for them and some of them chose to work. Some of them are mixed, so there would be people who are part Gypsy and they can be talented musicians, for example. They're not that bad, some of them are stealthy though so you have to be careful. When some of them sell weed, it's not that problematic, but when it's something heavier then it's not that great.

    It is sad that those Gypsies fleeing Ukraine encounter hardship, they shouldn't leave Western Ukraine which is peaceful, best for them is to live in their home village or their tabor.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    Of course, most of them want to bail to Western Europe and only use Eastern Europe as a trampoline, but there is a certain percentage who want to stay and it is not that low (don’t have the exact number but it could be anywhere from 10-30%, which is A LOT!).

    You’ll get more and better Indian food as a result of this. 😉

    At some point in the distant future, the freedom of movement could become an issue that might have to be renegotiated. But that’s speculative. The fundamentals of the EU should be protected, but they should not be abused by importing masses of non-Europeans.

    Not even those who are capable of becoming honorary Westerners and improving the West?

    In Hungary and Ukraine, things are worse for them than in the Baltic states. We had a work program for them and some of them chose to work. Some of them are mixed, so there would be people who are part Gypsy and they can be talented musicians, for example. They’re not that bad, some of them are stealthy though so you have to be careful. When some of them sell weed, it’s not that problematic, but when it’s something heavier then it’s not that great.

    It is sad that those Gypsies fleeing Ukraine encounter hardship, they shouldn’t leave Western Ukraine which is peaceful, best for them is to live in their home village or their tabor.

    When we visited Russia back in 2004 a Gypsy boy tried to steal my younger sibling’s ball. He failed.

    It was the kind of ball that was attached to one’s finger, but looked differently from this one:

    Anyway, apparently Roma have a very low average IQ:

    https://www.unz.com/jthompson/gypsy-intelligence/

    I do wonder if environmental factors depress it, though.

    And they were apparently more productive under Communism in Hungary than they are in Hungary right now:

    https://www.unz.com/isteve/gypsy-facts/

    I’m glad that they’re fitting in better in the Baltics! 🙂

    • Replies: @LatW
    @Mr. XYZ


    You’ll get more and better Indian food as a result of this.
     
    That's not reason enough to fuck up one's country. Indian food is ok, but it's not all that. There are already plenty of fantastic restaurants in EE.

    Not even those who are capable of becoming honorary Westerners and improving the West?
     

    Not in my home country, no thank you.

    When we visited Russia back in 2004 a Gypsy boy tried to steal my younger sibling’s ball. He failed.
     
    It's just a ball. You should've given it to this boy, he most likely didn't have nice toys and would've appreciated it more.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

  1116. @talkative
    @Anatoly Karlin
    Has Anatoly ever had a woman in his life?

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    • Replies: @Ivashka the fool
    @Mr. XYZ

    At least he's not into teenage Trannies and bragging about it as you do, perv.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    , @RadicalCenter
    @Mr. XYZ

    I expected to see a pic of Sailer.

  1117. @Mr. XYZ
    @LatW


    Of course, most of them want to bail to Western Europe and only use Eastern Europe as a trampoline, but there is a certain percentage who want to stay and it is not that low (don’t have the exact number but it could be anywhere from 10-30%, which is A LOT!).

     

    You'll get more and better Indian food as a result of this. ;)

    At some point in the distant future, the freedom of movement could become an issue that might have to be renegotiated. But that’s speculative. The fundamentals of the EU should be protected, but they should not be abused by importing masses of non-Europeans.
     
    Not even those who are capable of becoming honorary Westerners and improving the West?

    In Hungary and Ukraine, things are worse for them than in the Baltic states. We had a work program for them and some of them chose to work. Some of them are mixed, so there would be people who are part Gypsy and they can be talented musicians, for example. They’re not that bad, some of them are stealthy though so you have to be careful. When some of them sell weed, it’s not that problematic, but when it’s something heavier then it’s not that great.

    It is sad that those Gypsies fleeing Ukraine encounter hardship, they shouldn’t leave Western Ukraine which is peaceful, best for them is to live in their home village or their tabor.
     
    When we visited Russia back in 2004 a Gypsy boy tried to steal my younger sibling's ball. He failed.

    It was the kind of ball that was attached to one's finger, but looked differently from this one:

    https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/61jSr7P0VFL._AC_UF350,350_QL80_.jpg

    Anyway, apparently Roma have a very low average IQ:

    https://www.unz.com/jthompson/gypsy-intelligence/

    I do wonder if environmental factors depress it, though.

    And they were apparently more productive under Communism in Hungary than they are in Hungary right now:

    https://www.unz.com/isteve/gypsy-facts/

    I'm glad that they're fitting in better in the Baltics! :)

    Replies: @LatW

    You’ll get more and better Indian food as a result of this.

    That’s not reason enough to fuck up one’s country. Indian food is ok, but it’s not all that. There are already plenty of fantastic restaurants in EE.

    Not even those who are capable of becoming honorary Westerners and improving the West?

    Not in my home country, no thank you.

    When we visited Russia back in 2004 a Gypsy boy tried to steal my younger sibling’s ball. He failed.

    It’s just a ball. You should’ve given it to this boy, he most likely didn’t have nice toys and would’ve appreciated it more.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @LatW


    That’s not reason enough to fuck up one’s country. Indian food is ok, but it’s not all that. There are already plenty of fantastic restaurants in EE.
     
    Which cuisines?

    And how do these restaurants compare with comparable Western restaurants?

    Not in my home country, no thank you.
     
    Your country is rapidly becoming depopulated! ;)

    In terms of space, Latvia has a lot of spare space to spare:

    https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/figures/population-density-2/pop01c00v3int_graphic.eps/pop01c00v3int_graphic.eps.75dpi.png/at_download/image

    It’s just a ball. You should’ve given it to this boy, he most likely didn’t have nice toys and would’ve appreciated it more.
     
    Good luck telling a four-year-old child that they deserve to lose a yellow ball that they really like!

    Replies: @LatW

  1118. @AP
    @Gerard1234

    You are unwanted guest just like those rioting Algerians in France; you defend them because they are your peers. Of course you are worse then them, they were born in France, whereas you are a filthy Sovok untermensch who chose to pollute England with your presence. Go home. They have flights through Serbia or Turkey.


    Ukronazi slave retards under Polish rule, are either toilet cleaners and mass whores
     
    The typical Sovok obsession with prostitutes. It's what you people know best. It's what you do.

    When you write that about Ukraine you are just admitting that Donbass is Ukraine.

    Algerians do at least have a middle class in France, many intellectuals, have held big government positions
     
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gr%C3%A9goire_Orlyk

    Grégoire Orlyk, also Hryhor Orlyk (Ukrainian: Григор Пилипович Орлик,[1] November 5, 1702, Baturyn – November 14, 1759, Minden), was a French military commander, special envoy and member of Louis XV's secret intelligence service. Grégoire Orlyk was born in Ukraine, the son of Ukrainian hetman in exile Pylyp Orlyk and Hanna Hertsyk. He received a good education in Sweden, served in Poland and Saxony, and participated in the secret efforts of France to restore Stanisław Leszczyński to the Polish throne. He later commanded the king's regiment of Royal suedois. For his intelligence work and military exploits he was given the title of comte and promoted to the general's rank of Maréchal de camp. Grégoire Orlyk was an acquaintance of the French philosopher Voltaire, and championed the Ukrainian cause in France and other countries.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @QCIC

    Gerard1234 plays a crucial role calling bullshit on the often subtle factual errors woven into comments from AP and Hack. This has proven to be the case hundreds of times, where the Ukie backers are mistaken or let their enthusiasm get the best of them or even more importantly when they weave a misleading tapestry on some point or another.

    This interplay is very helpful, thanks to all.

  1119. @LatW
    @Ivashka the fool


    though she had a hard time adapting and they nearly split with her going back to Japan.
     
    That's tough. Plus the Japanese are very different from other Asians in that they are very attached to their homeland, especially women (who have a hard time being away from home). I don't think Japanese women should live in the West or among any Whites, because they are just so delicate and refined, I think White society is too rough for them. They are best sheltered at home. I also imagine that the relatively patriarchal relationships that they experience at home in Japan are not as bad as people sometimes make them out to be.

    although they value natural beauty
     
    Well, this is kind of universal, everyone values natural beauty, but, yes, I have known some who enjoy landscapes, camping, hiking. Overall they have good habits.

    Vancouver is a good example, it is very much Chinese, in some neighborhoods the local Whites are only represented by the heroine addicts sleeping on the street.
     
    I visited Vancouver several years ago and, yes, it is very Asian, not sure if it's majority Asian at this point, but I did see some decent looking and well dressed Whites there as well. Most Whites live on the outskirts of Vancouver, in all those suburban areas, the housing costs there are insane. However, the Pacific region of North America has always had strong Asian influences, with Japanese vessels washing up on the coast of the US and Canada in ancient times, with exquisite Japanese gardening and with all kinds of unique cultures such as Aleuts and native seafaring tribes (although those are not Asian, of course), and there is a long history of Chinese presence in places such as San Francisco, but of course these massive new waves of Asian immigrants is something different.

    The Indians can be problematic in that they have traditionally enjoyed partaking in leftist politics. They can be a little too pushy for my taste.

    Of course, these communities will affect the cultural make up of North America, although in the case of Vancouver and other such places, it would not hurt to remember that they were created by the British. These new Chinese arrivals should acknowledge that.

    Replies: @S, @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    Yes but Japanese women are better than white women women at some rough sports 😉

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Olympic_medalists_in_freestyle_wrestling#Women

    Most of your observations about Asians are right on. But low fertility for East Asians is related to existing over-population. That not the case for Euros.

    The kind of “roughness” or assertiveness for northern Euro women is going overboard I’m afraid. Don’t get me wrong, I respect it to an extent. Most East Asian girls, especially Chinese, are indeed way too lame and materialistic.

    I just saw that there is a Diane Kruger movie In The Fade about her avenging her Turkish husband against “neo-Nazis” by blowing herself up (I only saw the trailer I couldn’t watch the entire thing).

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    Some European countries are indeed overpopulated, no? The Netherlands, northern Belgium, western Germany, England, et cetera:

    https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/figures/population-density-2/pop01c00v3int_graphic.eps/pop01c00v3int_graphic.eps.75dpi.png/at_download/image

    And even though East Asian women can be perceived as weak, there are certainly some exceptions to this rule:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RzKBzpUdPzc

    , @LatW
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms


    Yes but Japanese women are better than white women women at some rough sports
     
    We have some awesome javelin throwers and track and field athletes, however, those are not "rough" sports (they are tough but not rough, I guess).

    And I'm not at all a fan of women's wrestling (I can't stand a woman hitting another woman). LOL But the Japanese one is made to be humorous on purpose. I watched a bit of it, it was really bad, although there were some decent, athletic types.

    Btw, I didn't mean at all that there are no White women that are as delicate as Asian, of course, there are. It's just that overall Whites seem more intense to be around, more outspoken in some ways, more competitive. Asian women (and even men) are more timid, overall Asians seem easier to be around, at least in my experience, they seem to be much more agreeable. Although I've heard some people say that Chinese women can be pretty loud and dominant. It depends on who they are, I suppose.

    But low fertility for East Asians is related to existing over-population.
     
    It doesn't have to do with relationships? Is it the lack of housing?

    The kind of “roughness” or assertiveness for northern Euro women is going overboard I’m afraid.
     
    Not all are that way. Some northern Euro women can be a bit rough (some Anglo women especially), but most Nordic women are actually quite agreeable. There are also Nordic femmes which are incredible when they're subtle and beautiful, quiet and graceful. It really depends.


    Most East Asian girls, especially Chinese, are indeed way too lame and materialistic.
     
    I wonder if they're as materialistic in China as they are in the West. But it could make some of them good businesswomen probably.

    I just saw that there is a Diane Kruger movie In The Fade about her avenging her Turkish husband against “neo-Nazis” by blowing herself up (I only saw the trailer I couldn’t watch the entire thing).

     

    Oh, geez... (eye roll). Well, it's good that she plays someone who is loyal to her husband, but the "evil neo-Nazi" stuff is soooo tiresome. I like it when White women are physical in a healthy way, in a valkyrie kind of way, but not when they are made to act like men. Although a bit crazy can be hilarious. :)
  1120. @Mr. XYZ
    @talkative

    This is the kind of pussy that Anatoly prefers to stroke lol:

    https://images.unsplash.com/photo-1606425270259-998c37268501?ixlib=rb-4.0.3&ixid=M3wxMjA3fDB8MHxzZWFyY2h8MXx8cHVzc3ljYXR8ZW58MHx8MHx8fDA%3D&w=1000&q=80

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @RadicalCenter

    At least he’s not into teenage Trannies and bragging about it as you do, perv.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @Ivashka the fool

    Where exactly did I express an interest in *teenage* trannies specifically?

  1121. @LatW
    @Mr. XYZ


    You’ll get more and better Indian food as a result of this.
     
    That's not reason enough to fuck up one's country. Indian food is ok, but it's not all that. There are already plenty of fantastic restaurants in EE.

    Not even those who are capable of becoming honorary Westerners and improving the West?
     

    Not in my home country, no thank you.

    When we visited Russia back in 2004 a Gypsy boy tried to steal my younger sibling’s ball. He failed.
     
    It's just a ball. You should've given it to this boy, he most likely didn't have nice toys and would've appreciated it more.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    That’s not reason enough to fuck up one’s country. Indian food is ok, but it’s not all that. There are already plenty of fantastic restaurants in EE.

    Which cuisines?

    And how do these restaurants compare with comparable Western restaurants?

    Not in my home country, no thank you.

    Your country is rapidly becoming depopulated! 😉

    In terms of space, Latvia has a lot of spare space to spare:

    https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/figures/population-density-2/pop01c00v3int_graphic.eps/pop01c00v3int_graphic.eps.75dpi.png/at_download/image

    It’s just a ball. You should’ve given it to this boy, he most likely didn’t have nice toys and would’ve appreciated it more.

    Good luck telling a four-year-old child that they deserve to lose a yellow ball that they really like!

    • Replies: @LatW
    @Mr. XYZ


    Which cuisines?
     
    There are various cuisines as well as many fusion restaurants. But that's not even that important since most people prefer local food. I really don't see how the availability of an exotic cuisine is in any way a necessity. Especially when one can travel to London any time and go to one of the food courts there.

    Your country is rapidly becoming depopulated!
     
    Even if it were, that's no excuse to fill it up with foreigners. Nobody is entitled to anybody's land or any other property. Were you not raised to know this very basic rule?

    In terms of space, Latvia has a lot of spare space to spare
     
    There is nothing "to spare". It already belongs to somebody. But it can be shared with nice people like Ukrainians.

    As to space, the Baltic people need a lot of it. Are you kidding? A traditional Baltic homestead contains several buildings, lots of acreage, some forest, maybe a little pond. That's the bare minimum. So no, there is not much to spare. Besides, it's good to have extra territory, especially when it comes to arable soil and forest, you don't want to overuse it but want to leave it for posterity. It must be maintained in a sustainable way. Do you seriously not know these basic things?

    Russia has lots of empty space, too, so what? Look up the map Russia at night, 80% of it is empty. But that's good, because it's good for sustainability and for posterity.

    Good luck telling a four-year-old child that they deserve to lose a yellow ball that they really like!
     
    Aw, I didn't realize your sibling was that young at the time. In that case, of course no, forget it. :) But that's the right age to start learning to share. :) I think it's a good age to teach a Jewish boy to share with a Gypsy boy, right? :)

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

  1122. @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms
    @LatW

    Yes but Japanese women are better than white women women at some rough sports 😉

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Olympic_medalists_in_freestyle_wrestling#Women

    Most of your observations about Asians are right on. But low fertility for East Asians is related to existing over-population. That not the case for Euros.

    The kind of "roughness" or assertiveness for northern Euro women is going overboard I'm afraid. Don't get me wrong, I respect it to an extent. Most East Asian girls, especially Chinese, are indeed way too lame and materialistic.

    I just saw that there is a Diane Kruger movie In The Fade about her avenging her Turkish husband against "neo-Nazis" by blowing herself up (I only saw the trailer I couldn't watch the entire thing).

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @LatW

    Some European countries are indeed overpopulated, no? The Netherlands, northern Belgium, western Germany, England, et cetera:

    https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/figures/population-density-2/pop01c00v3int_graphic.eps/pop01c00v3int_graphic.eps.75dpi.png/at_download/image

    And even though East Asian women can be perceived as weak, there are certainly some exceptions to this rule:

  1123. @Ivashka the fool
    @Mr. XYZ

    At least he's not into teenage Trannies and bragging about it as you do, perv.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    Where exactly did I express an interest in *teenage* trannies specifically?

  1124. LatW says:
    @Mr. XYZ
    @LatW


    That’s not reason enough to fuck up one’s country. Indian food is ok, but it’s not all that. There are already plenty of fantastic restaurants in EE.
     
    Which cuisines?

    And how do these restaurants compare with comparable Western restaurants?

    Not in my home country, no thank you.
     
    Your country is rapidly becoming depopulated! ;)

    In terms of space, Latvia has a lot of spare space to spare:

    https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/figures/population-density-2/pop01c00v3int_graphic.eps/pop01c00v3int_graphic.eps.75dpi.png/at_download/image

    It’s just a ball. You should’ve given it to this boy, he most likely didn’t have nice toys and would’ve appreciated it more.
     
    Good luck telling a four-year-old child that they deserve to lose a yellow ball that they really like!

    Replies: @LatW

    Which cuisines?

    There are various cuisines as well as many fusion restaurants. But that’s not even that important since most people prefer local food. I really don’t see how the availability of an exotic cuisine is in any way a necessity. Especially when one can travel to London any time and go to one of the food courts there.

    Your country is rapidly becoming depopulated!

    Even if it were, that’s no excuse to fill it up with foreigners. Nobody is entitled to anybody’s land or any other property. Were you not raised to know this very basic rule?

    In terms of space, Latvia has a lot of spare space to spare

    There is nothing “to spare”. It already belongs to somebody. But it can be shared with nice people like Ukrainians.

    As to space, the Baltic people need a lot of it. Are you kidding? A traditional Baltic homestead contains several buildings, lots of acreage, some forest, maybe a little pond. That’s the bare minimum. So no, there is not much to spare. Besides, it’s good to have extra territory, especially when it comes to arable soil and forest, you don’t want to overuse it but want to leave it for posterity. It must be maintained in a sustainable way. Do you seriously not know these basic things?

    Russia has lots of empty space, too, so what? Look up the map Russia at night, 80% of it is empty. But that’s good, because it’s good for sustainability and for posterity.

    Good luck telling a four-year-old child that they deserve to lose a yellow ball that they really like!

    Aw, I didn’t realize your sibling was that young at the time. In that case, of course no, forget it. 🙂 But that’s the right age to start learning to share. 🙂 I think it’s a good age to teach a Jewish boy to share with a Gypsy boy, right? 🙂

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @LatW


    There are various cuisines as well as many fusion restaurants. But that’s not even that important since most people prefer local food. I really don’t see how the availability of an exotic cuisine is in any way a necessity. Especially when one can travel to London any time and go to one of the food courts there.

     

    Britain still allows visa-free travel for EU nationals? If so, it's still worth noting that travelling 1,000 miles to Britain is expensive (you need plane tickets) and it's much easier to go to an Indian restaurant nearby.

    I certainly wouldn't want to travel to Texas, let alone to New York, for Indian food. Heck, I'm not even willing to shop at Sam's Club because the drive is too long from me. And I like Sam's Club! I go to Costco instead. Which isn't bad, but I don't have the option of trying out Sam's Club instead. The one in our area closed over a decade ago, unfortunately.


    Even if it were, that’s no excuse to fill it up with foreigners. Nobody is entitled to anybody’s land or any other property. Were you not raised to know this very basic rule?
     
    Ilya Somin (a Jewish US libertarian law professor of ex-USSR descent) argues that the current citizens of nation-states are not entitled to them because many of them have a history of force and/or coercion. He literally makes this argument in his 2020 book Free to Move. Of course, using his logic (and he himself does not actually go that far), one could argue that a lot of private property is illegitimate because it also has a history of force and/or coercion.

    Of course, I'm sure that you will use him to argue why the West needs to be warier of Jews who don't have its own best interests at heart. Honestly, I don't fully buy Ilya Somin's logic, though I do support a generous immigration policy for culturally compatible people, including for my birth country of Israel, where I think that an influx of skilled non-Jewish immigrants could do a decent job of curbing the excessive Jewish chauvinism that is currently going on there:

    https://mosaicmagazine.com/essay/israel-zionism/2023/07/the-looming-war-over-israels-law-of-return/


    There is nothing “to spare”. It already belongs to somebody. But it can be shared with nice people like Ukrainians.
     
    And Indians aren't nice people, even excluding their Muslims?

    As to space, the Baltic people need a lot of it. Are you kidding? A traditional Baltic homestead contains several buildings, lots of acreage, some forest, maybe a little pond. That’s the bare minimum. So no, there is not much to spare. Besides, it’s good to have extra territory, especially when it comes to arable soil and forest, you don’t want to overuse it but want to leave it for posterity. It must be maintained in a sustainable way. Do you seriously not know these basic things?

    Russia has lots of empty space, too, so what? Look up the map Russia at night, 80% of it is empty. But that’s good, because it’s good for sustainability and for posterity.
     

    Balts mostly don't live in rural areas anymore, though. And Yes, forests, et cetera need to be preserved, but even so, there is still a lot of space for urban expansion. Riga metro's size could be doubled, if not tripled, for instance.

    Aw, I didn’t realize your sibling was that young at the time. In that case, of course no, forget it. 🙂 But that’s the right age to start learning to share. 🙂 I think it’s a good age to teach a Jewish boy to share with a Gypsy boy, right? 🙂
     
    I never actually said that my younger sibling was male, now did I? ;) Please don't assume! ;)

    Replies: @LatW, @John Johnson

  1125. @LatW
    @Mr. XYZ


    Which cuisines?
     
    There are various cuisines as well as many fusion restaurants. But that's not even that important since most people prefer local food. I really don't see how the availability of an exotic cuisine is in any way a necessity. Especially when one can travel to London any time and go to one of the food courts there.

    Your country is rapidly becoming depopulated!
     
    Even if it were, that's no excuse to fill it up with foreigners. Nobody is entitled to anybody's land or any other property. Were you not raised to know this very basic rule?

    In terms of space, Latvia has a lot of spare space to spare
     
    There is nothing "to spare". It already belongs to somebody. But it can be shared with nice people like Ukrainians.

    As to space, the Baltic people need a lot of it. Are you kidding? A traditional Baltic homestead contains several buildings, lots of acreage, some forest, maybe a little pond. That's the bare minimum. So no, there is not much to spare. Besides, it's good to have extra territory, especially when it comes to arable soil and forest, you don't want to overuse it but want to leave it for posterity. It must be maintained in a sustainable way. Do you seriously not know these basic things?

    Russia has lots of empty space, too, so what? Look up the map Russia at night, 80% of it is empty. But that's good, because it's good for sustainability and for posterity.

    Good luck telling a four-year-old child that they deserve to lose a yellow ball that they really like!
     
    Aw, I didn't realize your sibling was that young at the time. In that case, of course no, forget it. :) But that's the right age to start learning to share. :) I think it's a good age to teach a Jewish boy to share with a Gypsy boy, right? :)

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    There are various cuisines as well as many fusion restaurants. But that’s not even that important since most people prefer local food. I really don’t see how the availability of an exotic cuisine is in any way a necessity. Especially when one can travel to London any time and go to one of the food courts there.

    Britain still allows visa-free travel for EU nationals? If so, it’s still worth noting that travelling 1,000 miles to Britain is expensive (you need plane tickets) and it’s much easier to go to an Indian restaurant nearby.

    I certainly wouldn’t want to travel to Texas, let alone to New York, for Indian food. Heck, I’m not even willing to shop at Sam’s Club because the drive is too long from me. And I like Sam’s Club! I go to Costco instead. Which isn’t bad, but I don’t have the option of trying out Sam’s Club instead. The one in our area closed over a decade ago, unfortunately.

    Even if it were, that’s no excuse to fill it up with foreigners. Nobody is entitled to anybody’s land or any other property. Were you not raised to know this very basic rule?

    Ilya Somin (a Jewish US libertarian law professor of ex-USSR descent) argues that the current citizens of nation-states are not entitled to them because many of them have a history of force and/or coercion. He literally makes this argument in his 2020 book Free to Move. Of course, using his logic (and he himself does not actually go that far), one could argue that a lot of private property is illegitimate because it also has a history of force and/or coercion.

    Of course, I’m sure that you will use him to argue why the West needs to be warier of Jews who don’t have its own best interests at heart. Honestly, I don’t fully buy Ilya Somin’s logic, though I do support a generous immigration policy for culturally compatible people, including for my birth country of Israel, where I think that an influx of skilled non-Jewish immigrants could do a decent job of curbing the excessive Jewish chauvinism that is currently going on there:

    https://mosaicmagazine.com/essay/israel-zionism/2023/07/the-looming-war-over-israels-law-of-return/

    There is nothing “to spare”. It already belongs to somebody. But it can be shared with nice people like Ukrainians.

    And Indians aren’t nice people, even excluding their Muslims?

    As to space, the Baltic people need a lot of it. Are you kidding? A traditional Baltic homestead contains several buildings, lots of acreage, some forest, maybe a little pond. That’s the bare minimum. So no, there is not much to spare. Besides, it’s good to have extra territory, especially when it comes to arable soil and forest, you don’t want to overuse it but want to leave it for posterity. It must be maintained in a sustainable way. Do you seriously not know these basic things?

    Russia has lots of empty space, too, so what? Look up the map Russia at night, 80% of it is empty. But that’s good, because it’s good for sustainability and for posterity.

    Balts mostly don’t live in rural areas anymore, though. And Yes, forests, et cetera need to be preserved, but even so, there is still a lot of space for urban expansion. Riga metro’s size could be doubled, if not tripled, for instance.

    Aw, I didn’t realize your sibling was that young at the time. In that case, of course no, forget it. 🙂 But that’s the right age to start learning to share. 🙂 I think it’s a good age to teach a Jewish boy to share with a Gypsy boy, right? 🙂

    I never actually said that my younger sibling was male, now did I? 😉 Please don’t assume! 😉

    • Replies: @LatW
    @Mr. XYZ


    If so, it’s still worth noting that travelling 1,000 miles to Britain is expensive (you need plane tickets) and it’s much easier to go to an Indian restaurant nearby.
     
    It's quite cheap to travel to the UK. And it's a great experience there. Dude, Latvians do not need Indian food! They have their own food that they're used to. I myself quite like Indian food (the not so hot version of it), but I don't need it. Along with many other things, geez.

    Btw, did you know that some people travel to India for retreats, where they get to have the original food prepared right there at the retreat.


    Ilya Somin (a Jewish US libertarian law professor of ex-USSR descent) argues that the current citizens of nation-states are not entitled to them
     
    Oh, a "Jewish professor of ex-USSR descent" argues something again. :) What else is new? :) Just because this Ilya Syomin argues something, does it mean everyone has to listen to it?

    Btw, I like Jews like Ygal Levin better, he's also former USSR, his parents apparently, but he's patriotic and decent, he's a military expert. A Jew such as him who is down to earth, smart but not pushy, is much better than someone who believes that the world is a free for all and property rights do not exist.

    Libertarianism is a very extreme utopian ideology (even if it has some good aspects). I got over it by the time I was 18.


    one could argue that a lot of private property is illegitimate because it also has a history of force and/or coercion.
     
    You have to juxtapose this with principles of fairness, common sense, common good. And, of course, blood and soil. Otherwise if you take it to the absurd, then nothing belongs to anybody, but eventually the strong will trample the weak anyway.

    People put work into property when they build something, to claim it's illegitimate means to rob them.


    including for my birth country of Israel, where I think that an influx of skilled non-Jewish immigrants could do a decent job of curbing the excessive Jewish chauvinism that is currently going on there

     

    Why shouldn't patriotic Israelis be able to control their own population and control who gets to live in Israel? That is totally their right. Although grandparent is quite close, even if not that close. Some other countries have such a clause as well.

    And Indians aren’t nice people, even excluding their Muslims?
     
    Ukrainians are our brothers and sisters.

    And Yes, forests, et cetera need to be preserved, but even so, there is still a lot of space for urban expansion. Riga metro’s size could be doubled, if not tripled, for instance.
     
    It's being built out somewhat. It's important to have regional balance. One can live in the city but have a business or a property on the country side. What matters is quality of life. A place should maintain its unique character, not be flooded with masses of people just for the sake of progress or whatever.

    I never actually said that my younger sibling was male, now did I? 😉 Please don’t assume! 😉
     
    Oh, in that case I should take that back - she should've absolutely kept the ball, girls get to have those kinds of privileges. :) Poor kid, got taken to Russia and got beset by Gypsies.
    , @John Johnson
    @Mr. XYZ

    Ilya Somin (a Jewish US libertarian law professor of ex-USSR descent) argues that the current citizens of nation-states are not entitled to them because many of them have a history of force and/or coercion.

    That view fits with libertarian beliefs on citizenship as they never made logical sense in the first place.

    Ayn Rand, the original Jewish libertarian argued that all nations need to keep their borders open to sacred individuals from third world countries.

    On the issue of Israel she argued that the Arabs are actually savages like American Indians and the Israelis were an advanced civilization.

    Let me sum up Rand's position on immigration:

    African immigrants to America/Europe - Let in those precious individuals or you are the worst form of collectivist.
    Arabs in Israel - Kick them out cause they're f-ckin savages.

    As a friendly reminder the current libertarian party supports legal crack, full auto machine guns for Black felons, 9 month abortions and open borders. All in their platform at lp.org.

    Oh and if anyone knows the quote where Rand says we should lie about race if it exists then please share it.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Wokechoke

  1126. LatW says:
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms
    @LatW

    Yes but Japanese women are better than white women women at some rough sports 😉

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Olympic_medalists_in_freestyle_wrestling#Women

    Most of your observations about Asians are right on. But low fertility for East Asians is related to existing over-population. That not the case for Euros.

    The kind of "roughness" or assertiveness for northern Euro women is going overboard I'm afraid. Don't get me wrong, I respect it to an extent. Most East Asian girls, especially Chinese, are indeed way too lame and materialistic.

    I just saw that there is a Diane Kruger movie In The Fade about her avenging her Turkish husband against "neo-Nazis" by blowing herself up (I only saw the trailer I couldn't watch the entire thing).

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @LatW

    Yes but Japanese women are better than white women women at some rough sports

    We have some awesome javelin throwers and track and field athletes, however, those are not “rough” sports (they are tough but not rough, I guess).

    And I’m not at all a fan of women’s wrestling (I can’t stand a woman hitting another woman). LOL But the Japanese one is made to be humorous on purpose. I watched a bit of it, it was really bad, although there were some decent, athletic types.

    Btw, I didn’t mean at all that there are no White women that are as delicate as Asian, of course, there are. It’s just that overall Whites seem more intense to be around, more outspoken in some ways, more competitive. Asian women (and even men) are more timid, overall Asians seem easier to be around, at least in my experience, they seem to be much more agreeable. Although I’ve heard some people say that Chinese women can be pretty loud and dominant. It depends on who they are, I suppose.

    But low fertility for East Asians is related to existing over-population.

    It doesn’t have to do with relationships? Is it the lack of housing?

    The kind of “roughness” or assertiveness for northern Euro women is going overboard I’m afraid.

    Not all are that way. Some northern Euro women can be a bit rough (some Anglo women especially), but most Nordic women are actually quite agreeable. There are also Nordic femmes which are incredible when they’re subtle and beautiful, quiet and graceful. It really depends.

    Most East Asian girls, especially Chinese, are indeed way too lame and materialistic.

    I wonder if they’re as materialistic in China as they are in the West. But it could make some of them good businesswomen probably.

    [MORE]

    I just saw that there is a Diane Kruger movie In The Fade about her avenging her Turkish husband against “neo-Nazis” by blowing herself up (I only saw the trailer I couldn’t watch the entire thing).

    Oh, geez… (eye roll). Well, it’s good that she plays someone who is loyal to her husband, but the “evil neo-Nazi” stuff is soooo tiresome. I like it when White women are physical in a healthy way, in a valkyrie kind of way, but not when they are made to act like men. Although a bit crazy can be hilarious. 🙂

  1127. LatW says:
    @Mr. XYZ
    @LatW


    There are various cuisines as well as many fusion restaurants. But that’s not even that important since most people prefer local food. I really don’t see how the availability of an exotic cuisine is in any way a necessity. Especially when one can travel to London any time and go to one of the food courts there.

     

    Britain still allows visa-free travel for EU nationals? If so, it's still worth noting that travelling 1,000 miles to Britain is expensive (you need plane tickets) and it's much easier to go to an Indian restaurant nearby.

    I certainly wouldn't want to travel to Texas, let alone to New York, for Indian food. Heck, I'm not even willing to shop at Sam's Club because the drive is too long from me. And I like Sam's Club! I go to Costco instead. Which isn't bad, but I don't have the option of trying out Sam's Club instead. The one in our area closed over a decade ago, unfortunately.


    Even if it were, that’s no excuse to fill it up with foreigners. Nobody is entitled to anybody’s land or any other property. Were you not raised to know this very basic rule?
     
    Ilya Somin (a Jewish US libertarian law professor of ex-USSR descent) argues that the current citizens of nation-states are not entitled to them because many of them have a history of force and/or coercion. He literally makes this argument in his 2020 book Free to Move. Of course, using his logic (and he himself does not actually go that far), one could argue that a lot of private property is illegitimate because it also has a history of force and/or coercion.

    Of course, I'm sure that you will use him to argue why the West needs to be warier of Jews who don't have its own best interests at heart. Honestly, I don't fully buy Ilya Somin's logic, though I do support a generous immigration policy for culturally compatible people, including for my birth country of Israel, where I think that an influx of skilled non-Jewish immigrants could do a decent job of curbing the excessive Jewish chauvinism that is currently going on there:

    https://mosaicmagazine.com/essay/israel-zionism/2023/07/the-looming-war-over-israels-law-of-return/


    There is nothing “to spare”. It already belongs to somebody. But it can be shared with nice people like Ukrainians.
     
    And Indians aren't nice people, even excluding their Muslims?

    As to space, the Baltic people need a lot of it. Are you kidding? A traditional Baltic homestead contains several buildings, lots of acreage, some forest, maybe a little pond. That’s the bare minimum. So no, there is not much to spare. Besides, it’s good to have extra territory, especially when it comes to arable soil and forest, you don’t want to overuse it but want to leave it for posterity. It must be maintained in a sustainable way. Do you seriously not know these basic things?

    Russia has lots of empty space, too, so what? Look up the map Russia at night, 80% of it is empty. But that’s good, because it’s good for sustainability and for posterity.
     

    Balts mostly don't live in rural areas anymore, though. And Yes, forests, et cetera need to be preserved, but even so, there is still a lot of space for urban expansion. Riga metro's size could be doubled, if not tripled, for instance.

    Aw, I didn’t realize your sibling was that young at the time. In that case, of course no, forget it. 🙂 But that’s the right age to start learning to share. 🙂 I think it’s a good age to teach a Jewish boy to share with a Gypsy boy, right? 🙂
     
    I never actually said that my younger sibling was male, now did I? ;) Please don't assume! ;)

    Replies: @LatW, @John Johnson

    If so, it’s still worth noting that travelling 1,000 miles to Britain is expensive (you need plane tickets) and it’s much easier to go to an Indian restaurant nearby.

    It’s quite cheap to travel to the UK. And it’s a great experience there. Dude, Latvians do not need Indian food! They have their own food that they’re used to. I myself quite like Indian food (the not so hot version of it), but I don’t need it. Along with many other things, geez.

    Btw, did you know that some people travel to India for retreats, where they get to have the original food prepared right there at the retreat.

    Ilya Somin (a Jewish US libertarian law professor of ex-USSR descent) argues that the current citizens of nation-states are not entitled to them

    Oh, a “Jewish professor of ex-USSR descent” argues something again. 🙂 What else is new? 🙂 Just because this Ilya Syomin argues something, does it mean everyone has to listen to it?

    Btw, I like Jews like Ygal Levin better, he’s also former USSR, his parents apparently, but he’s patriotic and decent, he’s a military expert. A Jew such as him who is down to earth, smart but not pushy, is much better than someone who believes that the world is a free for all and property rights do not exist.

    Libertarianism is a very extreme utopian ideology (even if it has some good aspects). I got over it by the time I was 18.

    one could argue that a lot of private property is illegitimate because it also has a history of force and/or coercion.

    You have to juxtapose this with principles of fairness, common sense, common good. And, of course, blood and soil. Otherwise if you take it to the absurd, then nothing belongs to anybody, but eventually the strong will trample the weak anyway.

    People put work into property when they build something, to claim it’s illegitimate means to rob them.

    including for my birth country of Israel, where I think that an influx of skilled non-Jewish immigrants could do a decent job of curbing the excessive Jewish chauvinism that is currently going on there

    Why shouldn’t patriotic Israelis be able to control their own population and control who gets to live in Israel? That is totally their right. Although grandparent is quite close, even if not that close. Some other countries have such a clause as well.

    [MORE]

    And Indians aren’t nice people, even excluding their Muslims?

    Ukrainians are our brothers and sisters.

    And Yes, forests, et cetera need to be preserved, but even so, there is still a lot of space for urban expansion. Riga metro’s size could be doubled, if not tripled, for instance.

    It’s being built out somewhat. It’s important to have regional balance. One can live in the city but have a business or a property on the country side. What matters is quality of life. A place should maintain its unique character, not be flooded with masses of people just for the sake of progress or whatever.

    I never actually said that my younger sibling was male, now did I? 😉 Please don’t assume! 😉

    Oh, in that case I should take that back – she should’ve absolutely kept the ball, girls get to have those kinds of privileges. 🙂 Poor kid, got taken to Russia and got beset by Gypsies.

  1128. It’s quite cheap to travel to the UK. And it’s a great experience there. Dude, Latvians do not need Indian food! They have their own food that they’re used to. I myself quite like Indian food (the not so hot version of it), but I don’t need it. Along with many other things, geez.

    Well, I myself don’t need it but still want it lol. I don’t need Panda Express either but life without it would be more depressing for sure. 🙁 😉

    https://bloximages.chicago2.vip.townnews.com/azdailysun.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/0/a6/0a62dfd0-a204-5657-84d9-725a39baaae6/5c9009fe4b4c6.image.jpg?resize=1200%2C934

    Btw, did you know that some people travel to India for retreats, where they get to have the original food prepared right there at the retreat.

    That’s pretty cool but vacationing in a Third World country isn’t ideal, no?

    In any case, I want easy access to Indian, Chinese, Japanese, Filipino, Persian, et cetera food every day, and thankfully living in southern California provides me with this luxury! 🙂

    Oh, a “Jewish professor of ex-USSR descent” argues something again. 🙂 What else is new? 🙂 Just because this Ilya Syomin argues something, does it mean everyone has to listen to it?

    Btw, I like Jews like Ygal Levin better, he’s also former USSR, his parents apparently, but he’s patriotic and decent, he’s a military expert. A Jew such as him who is down to earth, smart but not pushy, is much better than someone who believes that the world is a free for all and property rights do not exist.

    Libertarianism is a very extreme utopian ideology (even if it has some good aspects). I got over it by the time I was 18.

    *Somin, not Syomin.

    Also, Yigal Levin or Yuval Lenin?

    Libertarianism has some good ideas, Yeah, but some of it appears to be naive and over-optimistic. Such as Bryan Caplan’s view that you can have open borders but deny voting rights and social safety net access to immigrants and their descendants for an indefinite number of generations, at least in any country that claims to be free and democratic. (Authoritarian dictatorship Qatar doesn’t count, obviously.)

    You have to juxtapose this with principles of fairness, common sense, common good. And, of course, blood and soil. Otherwise if you take it to the absurd, then nothing belongs to anybody, but eventually the strong will trample the weak anyway.

    People put work into property when they build something, to claim it’s illegitimate means to rob them.

    Yeah, and the same logic also applies to nation-states. The current inhabitants of nation-states and their ancestors built their nation-states, and this should give them the right to control who enters these nation-states. Though exceptions can be made in truly extraordinary circumstances, such as a hypothetical second Holocaust for some group that does not have its own homeland. Still, even then, temporary residency can be adopted rather than permanent residency and citizenship. Though it’s hard to do with countries that still have birthright citizenship, such as the US.

    Why shouldn’t patriotic Israelis be able to control their own population and control who gets to live in Israel? That is totally their right. Although grandparent is quite close, even if not that close. Some other countries have such a clause as well.

    Yeah, Ireland allows people with Irish parents and grandparents to move to Ireland and to get Irish citizenship. I view what Israeli right-wingers want to do as especially unfair because it would allow automatic entry to people with a single Jewish grandmother (because then these people would have a halakhic Jewish parent) but not to people with one or two Jewish grandfathers. That’s sexist and blatantly unfair and unreasonable!

    Israel has a right to set its immigration policy, but I also have a right to call out a stupid immigration policy whenever I see one. Such as in the 1920s US, which prevented a lot of European Jews from immigrating to the US. I also think that Israel will benefit from an influx of skilled and educated non-Jewish immigrants.

    Ukrainians are our brothers and sisters.

    Because they’re also Europeans and Indians are not?

    It’s being built out somewhat. It’s important to have regional balance. One can live in the city but have a business or a property on the country side. What matters is quality of life. A place should maintain its unique character, not be flooded with masses of people just for the sake of progress or whatever.

    Libertarians argue that if a state has a right to maintain its unique character, then this also means criminalizing speech and religion that threatens a state’s existing unique character, no? For instance, criminalizing pro-apostasy speech:

    https://www.timesofisrael.com/despite-pms-assurances-christian-zionists-bedeviled-by-anti-missionary-bill/

    If Israeli Ultra-Orthodox Jews had their way, this is probably what they would do. As in, criminalize pro-apostasy speech. Some Muslim countries apparently already do this.

    Oh, in that case I should take that back – she should’ve absolutely kept the ball, girls get to have those kinds of privileges. 🙂 Poor kid, got taken to Russia and got beset by Gypsies.

    Well, she got to keep her ball! 🙂

    BTW, do you know that she is much smarter than I myself am? She attended an elite US university and got a 4.0 GPA for all of her quarters there (and she had difficult majors and minors, not easy ones like I myself had, and in my own case, at a less demanding university), IIRC. Seriously. I myself am nowhere near that smart or capable (and I also likely suffer from ADHD), but my parents really hit the jackpot with her eight years after they had me! (Once I myself will reproduce, probably 10-20 years from now, I’d certainly want an egg donor who is similar to her in terms of IQ, personality, and the like!)

    • Replies: @LatW
    @Mr. XYZ


    I don’t need Panda Express either but life without it would be more depressing for sure.
     
    Well, Panda Express is cool (although I wonder how much sugar they use in their meals). Fast food protein bowls are also good. But my point is that one can indulge in different ways, there are plenty of local ways to indulge as well. You don't need immigrants for that.

    That’s pretty cool but vacationing in a Third World country isn’t ideal, no?
     
    Most of the time they stay at cute boutique hotels in places like Goa. But I saw a woman post on Instagram recently about a very large retreat where they had a huge well maintained kitchen where all these volunteers were cooking. She wouldn't live that way daily, as a lifestyle, but she's ok living on such a retreat for a week or so.


    Israel has a right to set its immigration policy, but I also have a right to call out a stupid immigration policy whenever I see one. Such as in the 1920s US, which prevented a lot of European Jews from immigrating to the US. I also think that Israel will benefit from an influx of skilled and educated non-Jewish immigrants.
     
    You maybe have a right to "call out" or criticize, but you do not have the right to dictate, to demand, to insist, or whatever. Neither in Israel or in the US, because you're not committed to Israel enough to live there, and you are an FOB in the US. Sorry, man. That's just how these things work.

    Also, Yigal Levin or Yuval Lenin?
     
    He spells it Yigal Levin, how is that name pronounced? With a European 'j' or just 'i'? I thought it was "Igal".

    I view what Israeli right-wingers want to do as especially unfair because it would allow automatic entry to people with a single Jewish grandmother (because then these people would have a halakhic Jewish parent) but not to people with one or two Jewish grandfathers. That’s sexist and blatantly unfair and unreasonable!
     
    Well, it's an old tradition that is there for a reason and it should be respected. It is the "good" kind of "sexism" in this case.

    BTW, do you know that she is much smarter than I myself am?
     
    I totally get it - I have a younger sister who is more successful than I (she makes 6 figures and she used to be a semi-professional athlete). She is so conscientious that she folds the bed military style in the morning and keeps everything super tidy. So I can relate, maybe the parents invest more in the younger sibling.

    (Once I myself will reproduce, probably 10-20 years from now, I’d certainly want an egg donor who is similar to her in terms of IQ, personality, and the like!)
     

    Are you going to tell your future wife on the first date that you're looking for an "egg donor"? LOL

    But, yea, this is all totally possible - to have a very high IQ child, even a good looking one, and even a love child. And that's always the best, those are the best energies for the child.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

  1129. LatW says:
    @Mr. XYZ

    It’s quite cheap to travel to the UK. And it’s a great experience there. Dude, Latvians do not need Indian food! They have their own food that they’re used to. I myself quite like Indian food (the not so hot version of it), but I don’t need it. Along with many other things, geez.
     
    Well, I myself don't need it but still want it lol. I don't need Panda Express either but life without it would be more depressing for sure. :( ;)

    https://bloximages.chicago2.vip.townnews.com/azdailysun.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/0/a6/0a62dfd0-a204-5657-84d9-725a39baaae6/5c9009fe4b4c6.image.jpg?resize=1200%2C934


    Btw, did you know that some people travel to India for retreats, where they get to have the original food prepared right there at the retreat.
     
    That's pretty cool but vacationing in a Third World country isn't ideal, no?

    In any case, I want easy access to Indian, Chinese, Japanese, Filipino, Persian, et cetera food every day, and thankfully living in southern California provides me with this luxury! :)


    Oh, a “Jewish professor of ex-USSR descent” argues something again. 🙂 What else is new? 🙂 Just because this Ilya Syomin argues something, does it mean everyone has to listen to it?

    Btw, I like Jews like Ygal Levin better, he’s also former USSR, his parents apparently, but he’s patriotic and decent, he’s a military expert. A Jew such as him who is down to earth, smart but not pushy, is much better than someone who believes that the world is a free for all and property rights do not exist.

    Libertarianism is a very extreme utopian ideology (even if it has some good aspects). I got over it by the time I was 18.
     

    *Somin, not Syomin.

    Also, Yigal Levin or Yuval Lenin?

    Libertarianism has some good ideas, Yeah, but some of it appears to be naive and over-optimistic. Such as Bryan Caplan's view that you can have open borders but deny voting rights and social safety net access to immigrants and their descendants for an indefinite number of generations, at least in any country that claims to be free and democratic. (Authoritarian dictatorship Qatar doesn't count, obviously.)


    You have to juxtapose this with principles of fairness, common sense, common good. And, of course, blood and soil. Otherwise if you take it to the absurd, then nothing belongs to anybody, but eventually the strong will trample the weak anyway.

    People put work into property when they build something, to claim it’s illegitimate means to rob them.
     

    Yeah, and the same logic also applies to nation-states. The current inhabitants of nation-states and their ancestors built their nation-states, and this should give them the right to control who enters these nation-states. Though exceptions can be made in truly extraordinary circumstances, such as a hypothetical second Holocaust for some group that does not have its own homeland. Still, even then, temporary residency can be adopted rather than permanent residency and citizenship. Though it's hard to do with countries that still have birthright citizenship, such as the US.

    Why shouldn’t patriotic Israelis be able to control their own population and control who gets to live in Israel? That is totally their right. Although grandparent is quite close, even if not that close. Some other countries have such a clause as well.
     
    Yeah, Ireland allows people with Irish parents and grandparents to move to Ireland and to get Irish citizenship. I view what Israeli right-wingers want to do as especially unfair because it would allow automatic entry to people with a single Jewish grandmother (because then these people would have a halakhic Jewish parent) but not to people with one or two Jewish grandfathers. That's sexist and blatantly unfair and unreasonable!

    Israel has a right to set its immigration policy, but I also have a right to call out a stupid immigration policy whenever I see one. Such as in the 1920s US, which prevented a lot of European Jews from immigrating to the US. I also think that Israel will benefit from an influx of skilled and educated non-Jewish immigrants.


    Ukrainians are our brothers and sisters.
     
    Because they're also Europeans and Indians are not?

    It’s being built out somewhat. It’s important to have regional balance. One can live in the city but have a business or a property on the country side. What matters is quality of life. A place should maintain its unique character, not be flooded with masses of people just for the sake of progress or whatever.
     
    Libertarians argue that if a state has a right to maintain its unique character, then this also means criminalizing speech and religion that threatens a state's existing unique character, no? For instance, criminalizing pro-apostasy speech:

    https://www.timesofisrael.com/despite-pms-assurances-christian-zionists-bedeviled-by-anti-missionary-bill/

    If Israeli Ultra-Orthodox Jews had their way, this is probably what they would do. As in, criminalize pro-apostasy speech. Some Muslim countries apparently already do this.


    Oh, in that case I should take that back – she should’ve absolutely kept the ball, girls get to have those kinds of privileges. 🙂 Poor kid, got taken to Russia and got beset by Gypsies.
     
    Well, she got to keep her ball! :)

    BTW, do you know that she is much smarter than I myself am? She attended an elite US university and got a 4.0 GPA for all of her quarters there (and she had difficult majors and minors, not easy ones like I myself had, and in my own case, at a less demanding university), IIRC. Seriously. I myself am nowhere near that smart or capable (and I also likely suffer from ADHD), but my parents really hit the jackpot with her eight years after they had me! (Once I myself will reproduce, probably 10-20 years from now, I'd certainly want an egg donor who is similar to her in terms of IQ, personality, and the like!)

    Replies: @LatW

    I don’t need Panda Express either but life without it would be more depressing for sure.

    Well, Panda Express is cool (although I wonder how much sugar they use in their meals). Fast food protein bowls are also good. But my point is that one can indulge in different ways, there are plenty of local ways to indulge as well. You don’t need immigrants for that.

    That’s pretty cool but vacationing in a Third World country isn’t ideal, no?

    Most of the time they stay at cute boutique hotels in places like Goa. But I saw a woman post on Instagram recently about a very large retreat where they had a huge well maintained kitchen where all these volunteers were cooking. She wouldn’t live that way daily, as a lifestyle, but she’s ok living on such a retreat for a week or so.

    [MORE]

    Israel has a right to set its immigration policy, but I also have a right to call out a stupid immigration policy whenever I see one. Such as in the 1920s US, which prevented a lot of European Jews from immigrating to the US. I also think that Israel will benefit from an influx of skilled and educated non-Jewish immigrants.

    You maybe have a right to “call out” or criticize, but you do not have the right to dictate, to demand, to insist, or whatever. Neither in Israel or in the US, because you’re not committed to Israel enough to live there, and you are an FOB in the US. Sorry, man. That’s just how these things work.

    Also, Yigal Levin or Yuval Lenin?

    He spells it Yigal Levin, how is that name pronounced? With a European ‘j’ or just ‘i’? I thought it was “Igal”.

    I view what Israeli right-wingers want to do as especially unfair because it would allow automatic entry to people with a single Jewish grandmother (because then these people would have a halakhic Jewish parent) but not to people with one or two Jewish grandfathers. That’s sexist and blatantly unfair and unreasonable!

    Well, it’s an old tradition that is there for a reason and it should be respected. It is the “good” kind of “sexism” in this case.

    BTW, do you know that she is much smarter than I myself am?

    I totally get it – I have a younger sister who is more successful than I (she makes 6 figures and she used to be a semi-professional athlete). She is so conscientious that she folds the bed military style in the morning and keeps everything super tidy. So I can relate, maybe the parents invest more in the younger sibling.

    (Once I myself will reproduce, probably 10-20 years from now, I’d certainly want an egg donor who is similar to her in terms of IQ, personality, and the like!)

    Are you going to tell your future wife on the first date that you’re looking for an “egg donor”? LOL

    But, yea, this is all totally possible – to have a very high IQ child, even a good looking one, and even a love child. And that’s always the best, those are the best energies for the child.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @LatW


    Well, Panda Express is cool (although I wonder how much sugar they use in their meals). Fast food protein bowls are also good. But my point is that one can indulge in different ways, there are plenty of local ways to indulge as well. You don’t need immigrants for that.
     
    Immigrants do likely increase the amount of diverse foods that one is exposed to, though. Just gotta make sure that the immigrants themselves are actually culturally compatible. Does Latvia have great Latin American food in spite of it having virtually no Latin Americans, for instance?

    Most of the time they stay at cute boutique hotels in places like Goa. But I saw a woman post on Instagram recently about a very large retreat where they had a huge well maintained kitchen where all these volunteers were cooking. She wouldn’t live that way daily, as a lifestyle, but she’s ok living on such a retreat for a week or so.
     
    Interesting.

    You maybe have a right to “call out” or criticize, but you do not have the right to dictate, to demand, to insist, or whatever. Neither in Israel or in the US, because you’re not committed to Israel enough to live there, and you are an FOB in the US. Sorry, man. That’s just how these things work.

     

    You don't believe that people who are fresh off the boat should have a right to help determine their countries' policies, even if they have citizenship? And FWIW, I have lived in the US since March 2001. So, for over 22 years. Not exactly FOB (fresh off the boat). I became a US citizen in May 2010, I think, and turned 18 a couple of months later.

    He spells it Yigal Levin, how is that name pronounced? With a European ‘j’ or just ‘i’? I thought it was “Igal”.
     
    Thanks; so, I must be confusing the two.

    Well, it’s an old tradition that is there for a reason and it should be respected.
     
    DNA testing removes the value of this tradition.

    And Karaites believe in patrilineal descent because they don't believe that the rabbis can overrule the Torah. For that matter, US Reform Judaism believes in bilinear descent, at least if the kid is raised Jewish (though even then, it might be inconsistent on enforcement of the last part here).

    It is the “good” kind of “sexism” in this case.
     
    How so when it gives Jewish women a carte blanche to intermarry without giving an equivalent carte blanche to Jewish men?

    And people who have a single Jewish grandmother and three gentile grandparents are unlikely to be very committed to Judaism either. So, why admit them to Israel automatically upon request either?

    I totally get it – I have a younger sister who is more successful than I (she makes 6 figures and she used to be a semi-professional athlete). She is so conscientious that she folds the bed military style in the morning and keeps everything super tidy. So I can relate, maybe the parents invest more in the younger sibling.
     
    I don't think that it's a case of more investment for my own younger sibling. If anything, I myself might have gotten more investment since I needed it much more. My younger sibling doesn't appear to have ever needed all that much help. Her brainpower was already evident back when she was 12 or 13 years old and her grades in all of her classes were near 100%--as in, near-perfect.

    Are you going to tell your future wife on the first date that you’re looking for an “egg donor”? LOL

    But, yea, this is all totally possible – to have a very high IQ child, even a good looking one, and even a love child. And that’s always the best, those are the best energies for the child.
     
    Honestly, I'm not sure that I'm actually cut out for the idea of raising a child. So, I might prefer to only date childfree women while also eventually going to Mexico and reproducing with the help of a couple of egg donors and Mexican surrogates and then giving the resulting children up for adoption in the form of an open adoption so that I could still maintain a relationship with them. I want to reproduce (around three children), but I don't want to be my future children's primary caregiver and I'm not rich enough to hire a nanny, let alone a permanent one. My approach here will be expensive but still much cheaper than personally raising three children. I also support voluntary eugenics and oppose dysgenics and thus I think that I should personally practice what I preach in due time if I actually can afford to do so. Finally, I deeply regret the fact that my maternal grandparents don't have very many descendants to begin with: Just me, my younger sibling, and my Israeli quarter-Jewish cousin (who is duller than both of us and isn't exactly a huge success). They had another granddaughter but she died as a baby back in the 1980s and her father (my mom's brother) himself died at age 40 in 2001 before he could have any additional children. So, Yeah, I feel like I need to at least owe it to them and their memory/legacy to have around three children, even if I won't be personally raising them but will actively be maintaining a relationship with them. As a side note, I certainly think that the US could always benefit from having more smart people. :)

    Replies: @LatW

  1130. @LatW
    @Mr. XYZ


    I don’t need Panda Express either but life without it would be more depressing for sure.
     
    Well, Panda Express is cool (although I wonder how much sugar they use in their meals). Fast food protein bowls are also good. But my point is that one can indulge in different ways, there are plenty of local ways to indulge as well. You don't need immigrants for that.

    That’s pretty cool but vacationing in a Third World country isn’t ideal, no?
     
    Most of the time they stay at cute boutique hotels in places like Goa. But I saw a woman post on Instagram recently about a very large retreat where they had a huge well maintained kitchen where all these volunteers were cooking. She wouldn't live that way daily, as a lifestyle, but she's ok living on such a retreat for a week or so.


    Israel has a right to set its immigration policy, but I also have a right to call out a stupid immigration policy whenever I see one. Such as in the 1920s US, which prevented a lot of European Jews from immigrating to the US. I also think that Israel will benefit from an influx of skilled and educated non-Jewish immigrants.
     
    You maybe have a right to "call out" or criticize, but you do not have the right to dictate, to demand, to insist, or whatever. Neither in Israel or in the US, because you're not committed to Israel enough to live there, and you are an FOB in the US. Sorry, man. That's just how these things work.

    Also, Yigal Levin or Yuval Lenin?
     
    He spells it Yigal Levin, how is that name pronounced? With a European 'j' or just 'i'? I thought it was "Igal".

    I view what Israeli right-wingers want to do as especially unfair because it would allow automatic entry to people with a single Jewish grandmother (because then these people would have a halakhic Jewish parent) but not to people with one or two Jewish grandfathers. That’s sexist and blatantly unfair and unreasonable!
     
    Well, it's an old tradition that is there for a reason and it should be respected. It is the "good" kind of "sexism" in this case.

    BTW, do you know that she is much smarter than I myself am?
     
    I totally get it - I have a younger sister who is more successful than I (she makes 6 figures and she used to be a semi-professional athlete). She is so conscientious that she folds the bed military style in the morning and keeps everything super tidy. So I can relate, maybe the parents invest more in the younger sibling.

    (Once I myself will reproduce, probably 10-20 years from now, I’d certainly want an egg donor who is similar to her in terms of IQ, personality, and the like!)
     

    Are you going to tell your future wife on the first date that you're looking for an "egg donor"? LOL

    But, yea, this is all totally possible - to have a very high IQ child, even a good looking one, and even a love child. And that's always the best, those are the best energies for the child.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ

    Well, Panda Express is cool (although I wonder how much sugar they use in their meals). Fast food protein bowls are also good. But my point is that one can indulge in different ways, there are plenty of local ways to indulge as well. You don’t need immigrants for that.

    Immigrants do likely increase the amount of diverse foods that one is exposed to, though. Just gotta make sure that the immigrants themselves are actually culturally compatible. Does Latvia have great Latin American food in spite of it having virtually no Latin Americans, for instance?

    Most of the time they stay at cute boutique hotels in places like Goa. But I saw a woman post on Instagram recently about a very large retreat where they had a huge well maintained kitchen where all these volunteers were cooking. She wouldn’t live that way daily, as a lifestyle, but she’s ok living on such a retreat for a week or so.

    Interesting.

    You maybe have a right to “call out” or criticize, but you do not have the right to dictate, to demand, to insist, or whatever. Neither in Israel or in the US, because you’re not committed to Israel enough to live there, and you are an FOB in the US. Sorry, man. That’s just how these things work.

    You don’t believe that people who are fresh off the boat should have a right to help determine their countries’ policies, even if they have citizenship? And FWIW, I have lived in the US since March 2001. So, for over 22 years. Not exactly FOB (fresh off the boat). I became a US citizen in May 2010, I think, and turned 18 a couple of months later.

    He spells it Yigal Levin, how is that name pronounced? With a European ‘j’ or just ‘i’? I thought it was “Igal”.

    Thanks; so, I must be confusing the two.

    Well, it’s an old tradition that is there for a reason and it should be respected.

    DNA testing removes the value of this tradition.

    And Karaites believe in patrilineal descent because they don’t believe that the rabbis can overrule the Torah. For that matter, US Reform Judaism believes in bilinear descent, at least if the kid is raised Jewish (though even then, it might be inconsistent on enforcement of the last part here).

    It is the “good” kind of “sexism” in this case.

    How so when it gives Jewish women a carte blanche to intermarry without giving an equivalent carte blanche to Jewish men?

    And people who have a single Jewish grandmother and three gentile grandparents are unlikely to be very committed to Judaism either. So, why admit them to Israel automatically upon request either?

    I totally get it – I have a younger sister who is more successful than I (she makes 6 figures and she used to be a semi-professional athlete). She is so conscientious that she folds the bed military style in the morning and keeps everything super tidy. So I can relate, maybe the parents invest more in the younger sibling.

    I don’t think that it’s a case of more investment for my own younger sibling. If anything, I myself might have gotten more investment since I needed it much more. My younger sibling doesn’t appear to have ever needed all that much help. Her brainpower was already evident back when she was 12 or 13 years old and her grades in all of her classes were near 100%–as in, near-perfect.

    Are you going to tell your future wife on the first date that you’re looking for an “egg donor”? LOL

    But, yea, this is all totally possible – to have a very high IQ child, even a good looking one, and even a love child. And that’s always the best, those are the best energies for the child.

    Honestly, I’m not sure that I’m actually cut out for the idea of raising a child. So, I might prefer to only date childfree women while also eventually going to Mexico and reproducing with the help of a couple of egg donors and Mexican surrogates and then giving the resulting children up for adoption in the form of an open adoption so that I could still maintain a relationship with them. I want to reproduce (around three children), but I don’t want to be my future children’s primary caregiver and I’m not rich enough to hire a nanny, let alone a permanent one. My approach here will be expensive but still much cheaper than personally raising three children. I also support voluntary eugenics and oppose dysgenics and thus I think that I should personally practice what I preach in due time if I actually can afford to do so. Finally, I deeply regret the fact that my maternal grandparents don’t have very many descendants to begin with: Just me, my younger sibling, and my Israeli quarter-Jewish cousin (who is duller than both of us and isn’t exactly a huge success). They had another granddaughter but she died as a baby back in the 1980s and her father (my mom’s brother) himself died at age 40 in 2001 before he could have any additional children. So, Yeah, I feel like I need to at least owe it to them and their memory/legacy to have around three children, even if I won’t be personally raising them but will actively be maintaining a relationship with them. As a side note, I certainly think that the US could always benefit from having more smart people. 🙂

    • Replies: @LatW
    @Mr. XYZ


    Immigrants do likely increase the amount of diverse foods that one is exposed to, though.
     
    The value of diverse foods do not trump the purity and continuity of one's ethnostate. Not even comparable in importance. America is a young country so it might be a different case.

    Does Latvia have great Latin American food in spite of it having virtually no Latin Americans, for instance?
     
    There are a lot of excellent chefs so it's possible to find one who will happily prepare Latin American food. For example, there are people who have worked in hospitality in places such as Brazil, helping run restaurants there. So there are people who are well versed in different cuisines and there are a ton of nice restaurants. There are sommeliers who have worked in France and there are all kinds of international cocktail mixing competitions and what not.

    You don’t believe that people who are fresh off the boat should have a right to help determine their countries’ policies, even if they have citizenship?
     
    They can provide input, but I don't think they should decide on important matters (only heritage Americans should, although sometimes heritage Americans have bad ideas). However, the US as a country is much more generous and gracious than that. All the more reason to shelter the US.

    DNA testing removes the value of this tradition.
     
    Not really, DNA testing does not trump Torah. Besides, this is a nice way to highlight the sanctity of motherhood, the European culture seems to respect the patrilineal aspect more, which is important but it has always felt one sided. I like how the Jewish culture sheds a different light on it.

    How so when it gives Jewish women a carte blanche to intermarry without giving an equivalent carte blanche to Jewish men?
     
    I don't believe most Jewish women are that inclined to intermarry, that's not how most women are, women typically prefer their own men (as the first choice). So this shouldn't even be an issue.

    Her brainpower was already evident back when she was 12 or 13 years old and her grades in all of her classes were near 100%–as in, near-perfect.
     
    Girls have better grades because they follow instructions better and girls want to please the teachers more. But I'm sure she was very smart, I already read pretty serious books around that age. Such as The Count of Monte Cristo and similar. What books did she read at that age?

    eventually going to Mexico and reproducing with the help of a couple of egg donors and Mexican surrogates and then giving the resulting children up for adoption in the form of an open adoption so that I could still maintain a relationship with them
     
    If you're going to do the whole MGTOW thing and have more than one child, I would suggest that you avoid splitting siblings - that's very cruel and amoral. They do eventually find each other and this is very hurtful, tragic. Maybe it's possible to find an adoptive family that will take one baby and you can let them know that one or two more children are coming. Most couples prefer adopting just one very young child, but there are also plenty who take several siblings and even teenage siblings. So you should be able to find someone like that.

    As a side note, I certainly think that the US could always benefit from having more smart people. 🙂
     
    Well, you're not dumb, I'll give you that, but every child is a blessing regardless of how smart they are. Every child should be loved, regardless of their brain power. Although smart kids are great. Getting outsmarted by a child is really funny. :)

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @RadicalCenter, @RadicalCenter

  1131. LatW says:
    @Mr. XYZ
    @LatW


    Well, Panda Express is cool (although I wonder how much sugar they use in their meals). Fast food protein bowls are also good. But my point is that one can indulge in different ways, there are plenty of local ways to indulge as well. You don’t need immigrants for that.
     
    Immigrants do likely increase the amount of diverse foods that one is exposed to, though. Just gotta make sure that the immigrants themselves are actually culturally compatible. Does Latvia have great Latin American food in spite of it having virtually no Latin Americans, for instance?

    Most of the time they stay at cute boutique hotels in places like Goa. But I saw a woman post on Instagram recently about a very large retreat where they had a huge well maintained kitchen where all these volunteers were cooking. She wouldn’t live that way daily, as a lifestyle, but she’s ok living on such a retreat for a week or so.
     
    Interesting.

    You maybe have a right to “call out” or criticize, but you do not have the right to dictate, to demand, to insist, or whatever. Neither in Israel or in the US, because you’re not committed to Israel enough to live there, and you are an FOB in the US. Sorry, man. That’s just how these things work.

     

    You don't believe that people who are fresh off the boat should have a right to help determine their countries' policies, even if they have citizenship? And FWIW, I have lived in the US since March 2001. So, for over 22 years. Not exactly FOB (fresh off the boat). I became a US citizen in May 2010, I think, and turned 18 a couple of months later.

    He spells it Yigal Levin, how is that name pronounced? With a European ‘j’ or just ‘i’? I thought it was “Igal”.
     
    Thanks; so, I must be confusing the two.

    Well, it’s an old tradition that is there for a reason and it should be respected.
     
    DNA testing removes the value of this tradition.

    And Karaites believe in patrilineal descent because they don't believe that the rabbis can overrule the Torah. For that matter, US Reform Judaism believes in bilinear descent, at least if the kid is raised Jewish (though even then, it might be inconsistent on enforcement of the last part here).

    It is the “good” kind of “sexism” in this case.
     
    How so when it gives Jewish women a carte blanche to intermarry without giving an equivalent carte blanche to Jewish men?

    And people who have a single Jewish grandmother and three gentile grandparents are unlikely to be very committed to Judaism either. So, why admit them to Israel automatically upon request either?

    I totally get it – I have a younger sister who is more successful than I (she makes 6 figures and she used to be a semi-professional athlete). She is so conscientious that she folds the bed military style in the morning and keeps everything super tidy. So I can relate, maybe the parents invest more in the younger sibling.
     
    I don't think that it's a case of more investment for my own younger sibling. If anything, I myself might have gotten more investment since I needed it much more. My younger sibling doesn't appear to have ever needed all that much help. Her brainpower was already evident back when she was 12 or 13 years old and her grades in all of her classes were near 100%--as in, near-perfect.

    Are you going to tell your future wife on the first date that you’re looking for an “egg donor”? LOL

    But, yea, this is all totally possible – to have a very high IQ child, even a good looking one, and even a love child. And that’s always the best, those are the best energies for the child.
     
    Honestly, I'm not sure that I'm actually cut out for the idea of raising a child. So, I might prefer to only date childfree women while also eventually going to Mexico and reproducing with the help of a couple of egg donors and Mexican surrogates and then giving the resulting children up for adoption in the form of an open adoption so that I could still maintain a relationship with them. I want to reproduce (around three children), but I don't want to be my future children's primary caregiver and I'm not rich enough to hire a nanny, let alone a permanent one. My approach here will be expensive but still much cheaper than personally raising three children. I also support voluntary eugenics and oppose dysgenics and thus I think that I should personally practice what I preach in due time if I actually can afford to do so. Finally, I deeply regret the fact that my maternal grandparents don't have very many descendants to begin with: Just me, my younger sibling, and my Israeli quarter-Jewish cousin (who is duller than both of us and isn't exactly a huge success). They had another granddaughter but she died as a baby back in the 1980s and her father (my mom's brother) himself died at age 40 in 2001 before he could have any additional children. So, Yeah, I feel like I need to at least owe it to them and their memory/legacy to have around three children, even if I won't be personally raising them but will actively be maintaining a relationship with them. As a side note, I certainly think that the US could always benefit from having more smart people. :)

    Replies: @LatW

    Immigrants do likely increase the amount of diverse foods that one is exposed to, though.

    The value of diverse foods do not trump the purity and continuity of one’s ethnostate. Not even comparable in importance. America is a young country so it might be a different case.

    Does Latvia have great Latin American food in spite of it having virtually no Latin Americans, for instance?

    There are a lot of excellent chefs so it’s possible to find one who will happily prepare Latin American food. For example, there are people who have worked in hospitality in places such as Brazil, helping run restaurants there. So there are people who are well versed in different cuisines and there are a ton of nice restaurants. There are sommeliers who have worked in France and there are all kinds of international cocktail mixing competitions and what not.

    You don’t believe that people who are fresh off the boat should have a right to help determine their countries’ policies, even if they have citizenship?

    They can provide input, but I don’t think they should decide on important matters (only heritage Americans should, although sometimes heritage Americans have bad ideas). However, the US as a country is much more generous and gracious than that. All the more reason to shelter the US.

    DNA testing removes the value of this tradition.

    Not really, DNA testing does not trump Torah. Besides, this is a nice way to highlight the sanctity of motherhood, the European culture seems to respect the patrilineal aspect more, which is important but it has always felt one sided. I like how the Jewish culture sheds a different light on it.

    How so when it gives Jewish women a carte blanche to intermarry without giving an equivalent carte blanche to Jewish men?

    I don’t believe most Jewish women are that inclined to intermarry, that’s not how most women are, women typically prefer their own men (as the first choice). So this shouldn’t even be an issue.

    [MORE]

    Her brainpower was already evident back when she was 12 or 13 years old and her grades in all of her classes were near 100%–as in, near-perfect.

    Girls have better grades because they follow instructions better and girls want to please the teachers more. But I’m sure she was very smart, I already read pretty serious books around that age. Such as The Count of Monte Cristo and similar. What books did she read at that age?

    eventually going to Mexico and reproducing with the help of a couple of egg donors and Mexican surrogates and then giving the resulting children up for adoption in the form of an open adoption so that I could still maintain a relationship with them

    If you’re going to do the whole MGTOW thing and have more than one child, I would suggest that you avoid splitting siblings – that’s very cruel and amoral. They do eventually find each other and this is very hurtful, tragic. Maybe it’s possible to find an adoptive family that will take one baby and you can let them know that one or two more children are coming. Most couples prefer adopting just one very young child, but there are also plenty who take several siblings and even teenage siblings. So you should be able to find someone like that.

    As a side note, I certainly think that the US could always benefit from having more smart people. 🙂

    Well, you’re not dumb, I’ll give you that, but every child is a blessing regardless of how smart they are. Every child should be loved, regardless of their brain power. Although smart kids are great. Getting outsmarted by a child is really funny. 🙂

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @LatW


    The value of diverse foods do not trump the purity and continuity of one’s ethnostate. Not even comparable in importance. America is a young country so it might be a different case.
     
    If you and your people want to have an ethno-state, then I won't force diversity on you. Your country already has some diversity due to its huge Slavic population, though.

    There are a lot of excellent chefs so it’s possible to find one who will happily prepare Latin American food. For example, there are people who have worked in hospitality in places such as Brazil, helping run restaurants there. So there are people who are well versed in different cuisines and there are a ton of nice restaurants. There are sommeliers who have worked in France and there are all kinds of international cocktail mixing competitions and what not.
     
    Interesting.

    They can provide input, but I don’t think they should decide on important matters (only heritage Americans should, although sometimes heritage Americans have bad ideas). However, the US as a country is much more generous and gracious than that. All the more reason to shelter the US.

     

    Shelter the US from whom?

    Not really, DNA testing does not trump Torah. Besides, this is a nice way to highlight the sanctity of motherhood, the European culture seems to respect the patrilineal aspect more, which is important but it has always felt one sided. I like how the Jewish culture sheds a different light on it.
     
    The matrilineal rule isn't in the Torah but rather in the Mishnah. This is why Karaites don't follow it. They reject the authority of the Mishnah and only follow the Torah.

    And are you assuming that males cannot play the role of the mother in terms of nurturing their babies? Eventually, biological males (trans women and non-binary people, at least) could even get uterus transplants, most likely. And eventually in-vitro gametogenesis will also allow artificial eggs to be made from men's skin cells and artificial sperm to be made from women's skin cells. Seriously.

    Patrilineal descent in Europe is primarily important when it comes to family names and historically when it came to royal succession rights in a lot of places. For instance, France had historically only allowed male agnatic descendants of Hugh Capet to inherit the French throne.


    I don’t believe most Jewish women are that inclined to intermarry, that’s not how most women are, women typically prefer their own men (as the first choice). So this shouldn’t even be an issue.

     

    In the Diaspora, especially here in the US, a lot of Jewish women do in fact intermarry, especially among non-Orthodox Jewish women. This isn't 1900 or even 1950 any longer.

    Girls have better grades because they follow instructions better and girls want to please the teachers more. But I’m sure she was very smart, I already read pretty serious books around that age. Such as The Count of Monte Cristo and similar. What books did she read at that age?

     

    Unlike myself, she has always enjoyed reading interesting fiction books. I myself prefer to watch fictional movies instead, along with of course watching historical movies and reading historical books.

    If you’re going to do the whole MGTOW thing and have more than one child, I would suggest that you avoid splitting siblings – that’s very cruel and amoral. They do eventually find each other and this is very hurtful, tragic. Maybe it’s possible to find an adoptive family that will take one baby and you can let them know that one or two more children are coming. Most couples prefer adopting just one very young child, but there are also plenty who take several siblings and even teenage siblings. So you should be able to find someone like that.
     
    Yes, I know that it's extremely important not to separate biological siblings. I'll also try producing all of them with the same egg donor if at all possible.

    Well, you’re not dumb, I’ll give you that, but every child is a blessing regardless of how smart they are. Every child should be loved, regardless of their brain power. Although smart kids are great. Getting outsmarted by a child is really funny. 🙂
     
    Many parents don't like dull children, as evidenced by them being very eager to abort fetuses with Down's syndrome. There was even a case where an Australian couple did surrogacy in Thailand and had twins, one of whom had Down's syndrome and was thus left behind in Thailand while they took his healthy twin brother back home to Australia with them:

    https://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/aug/01/baby-downs-syndrome-abandoned-thailand-australian-donations

    At least his adoptive (surrogate) mother subsequently managed to secure Australian citizenship for this Down's syndrome baby, thankfully:

    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-australia-30892258

    Replies: @RadicalCenter

    , @RadicalCenter
    @LatW

    So much to enjoy and ponder in your comment, as usual :)

    A note about the joy of having so many of the world's cuisines at your fingertips in your own area, prepared by natives of those other countries. We have lived in SoCal for well over a decade, and that is one of our favorite things about the region.

    BUT: there is no "need" to hand out citizenship to millions (tens of millions) of people from very different cultures just to get access to their cuisine. Merely offering permanent residence to foreigners to start their restaurant businesses here would induce them to come and offer their delicious foods in our cities.

    They would not get the right to vote or run for office, nor to donate to or work for political candidates or parties or PACs, nor the right to hold any government positions.

    Nor should their children born during their stay here, get "birthright" citizenship.

    Moreover, people who are allowed permanent residence for this purpose should be required to hire mostly native-born US Citizens to staff their restaurants. That sure as Hell does not look to be the case in most of the Chinese, Thai, Vietnamese, and Japanese restaurants that we frequent.

    In short, let them come here as permanent residents, treat them well, but never give them the right to become citizens, to vote, or in any way to influence our laws and government; the "right" to import more people from their countries to work in their businesses rather than our own native-born citizens; or the "right" to bring their elderly relatives (who will then receive hundreds of thousands of dollars each, if not millions of dollars each, of medical care at our taxpayer expense through Medicare).

    That's how you get the world's cuisines and a glimpse of the world's peoples in our neighborhoods, without being swamped and having our culture and laws forever transformed against our will.

    It's too late to undo most of the damage done, however, and in many cities and States there are now too many people here who will never go along with changing to such a system. But let's not pretend we had to give away our country and become a balkanized boarding house to the world, just to get better food choices.

    , @RadicalCenter
    @LatW

    So much to enjoy and ponder in your comment :)

    Allow me to pitch the Cuisine and Culture Visa, colloquially the Restaurant Visa.

    A note about the joy of having so many of the world's cuisines at your fingertips in your own area, prepared by natives of those other countries. We have lived in SoCal for well over a decade, and that is one of our favorite things about the region.

    BUT: there is no "need" to hand out citizenship to millions (tens of millions) of people from very different cultures just to get access to their cuisine. Merely offering permanent residence to foreigners to start their restaurant businesses here would induce plenty of them to come and offer their delicious foods in our cities.

    They would not get the right to vote or run for office,
    to donate to or work for political candidates or parties or PACs,
    to hold any government employment,
    to receive any loans or incentives from any level of government,
    or to receive food stamps, Medicare, unemployment benefits, or any other taxpayer-funded programs.

    Nor should their children born during their stay here, get "birthright" citizenship.

    Moreover, people who are allowed permanent residence for this purpose should be required to hire mostly native-born US Citizens to staff the non-chef jobs in their restaurants. That sure as Hell does not look to be the case in most of the e.g. Chinese, Thai, Vietnamese, and Japanese restaurants that we frequent.

    In short, let them come here as permanent residents, treat them well, but never give them the right to become citizens, to vote, or in any way to influence our laws and government; the "right" to import more people from their countries to work in their businesses rather than our own native-born citizens; or the "right" to bring their elderly relatives (who will then receive hundreds of thousands of dollars each, if not millions of dollars each, of medical care at our taxpayer expense through Medicare).

    That's how you get the world's cuisines and a glimpse of the world's peoples in our neighborhoods, without being swamped and having our culture and laws forever transformed against our will.

    It's too late to undo most of the damage done, however, and in many cities and States there are now too many people here who will never go along with changing to such a system. But let's not pretend we had to give away our country and become a balkanized boarding house to the world, just to get better food choices.

    ................

    PS as a single man, my friends and I used to joke about ending mass immigration but allowing a limited visa only for attractive young women, NO MEN. We called it The Hottie Visa. But I digress.

  1132. @LatW
    @Mr. XYZ


    Immigrants do likely increase the amount of diverse foods that one is exposed to, though.
     
    The value of diverse foods do not trump the purity and continuity of one's ethnostate. Not even comparable in importance. America is a young country so it might be a different case.

    Does Latvia have great Latin American food in spite of it having virtually no Latin Americans, for instance?
     
    There are a lot of excellent chefs so it's possible to find one who will happily prepare Latin American food. For example, there are people who have worked in hospitality in places such as Brazil, helping run restaurants there. So there are people who are well versed in different cuisines and there are a ton of nice restaurants. There are sommeliers who have worked in France and there are all kinds of international cocktail mixing competitions and what not.

    You don’t believe that people who are fresh off the boat should have a right to help determine their countries’ policies, even if they have citizenship?
     
    They can provide input, but I don't think they should decide on important matters (only heritage Americans should, although sometimes heritage Americans have bad ideas). However, the US as a country is much more generous and gracious than that. All the more reason to shelter the US.

    DNA testing removes the value of this tradition.
     
    Not really, DNA testing does not trump Torah. Besides, this is a nice way to highlight the sanctity of motherhood, the European culture seems to respect the patrilineal aspect more, which is important but it has always felt one sided. I like how the Jewish culture sheds a different light on it.

    How so when it gives Jewish women a carte blanche to intermarry without giving an equivalent carte blanche to Jewish men?
     
    I don't believe most Jewish women are that inclined to intermarry, that's not how most women are, women typically prefer their own men (as the first choice). So this shouldn't even be an issue.

    Her brainpower was already evident back when she was 12 or 13 years old and her grades in all of her classes were near 100%–as in, near-perfect.
     
    Girls have better grades because they follow instructions better and girls want to please the teachers more. But I'm sure she was very smart, I already read pretty serious books around that age. Such as The Count of Monte Cristo and similar. What books did she read at that age?

    eventually going to Mexico and reproducing with the help of a couple of egg donors and Mexican surrogates and then giving the resulting children up for adoption in the form of an open adoption so that I could still maintain a relationship with them
     
    If you're going to do the whole MGTOW thing and have more than one child, I would suggest that you avoid splitting siblings - that's very cruel and amoral. They do eventually find each other and this is very hurtful, tragic. Maybe it's possible to find an adoptive family that will take one baby and you can let them know that one or two more children are coming. Most couples prefer adopting just one very young child, but there are also plenty who take several siblings and even teenage siblings. So you should be able to find someone like that.

    As a side note, I certainly think that the US could always benefit from having more smart people. 🙂
     
    Well, you're not dumb, I'll give you that, but every child is a blessing regardless of how smart they are. Every child should be loved, regardless of their brain power. Although smart kids are great. Getting outsmarted by a child is really funny. :)

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @RadicalCenter, @RadicalCenter

    The value of diverse foods do not trump the purity and continuity of one’s ethnostate. Not even comparable in importance. America is a young country so it might be a different case.

    If you and your people want to have an ethno-state, then I won’t force diversity on you. Your country already has some diversity due to its huge Slavic population, though.

    There are a lot of excellent chefs so it’s possible to find one who will happily prepare Latin American food. For example, there are people who have worked in hospitality in places such as Brazil, helping run restaurants there. So there are people who are well versed in different cuisines and there are a ton of nice restaurants. There are sommeliers who have worked in France and there are all kinds of international cocktail mixing competitions and what not.

    Interesting.

    They can provide input, but I don’t think they should decide on important matters (only heritage Americans should, although sometimes heritage Americans have bad ideas). However, the US as a country is much more generous and gracious than that. All the more reason to shelter the US.

    Shelter the US from whom?

    Not really, DNA testing does not trump Torah. Besides, this is a nice way to highlight the sanctity of motherhood, the European culture seems to respect the patrilineal aspect more, which is important but it has always felt one sided. I like how the Jewish culture sheds a different light on it.

    The matrilineal rule isn’t in the Torah but rather in the Mishnah. This is why Karaites don’t follow it. They reject the authority of the Mishnah and only follow the Torah.

    And are you assuming that males cannot play the role of the mother in terms of nurturing their babies? Eventually, biological males (trans women and non-binary people, at least) could even get uterus transplants, most likely. And eventually in-vitro gametogenesis will also allow artificial eggs to be made from men’s skin cells and artificial sperm to be made from women’s skin cells. Seriously.

    Patrilineal descent in Europe is primarily important when it comes to family names and historically when it came to royal succession rights in a lot of places. For instance, France had historically only allowed male agnatic descendants of Hugh Capet to inherit the French throne.

    I don’t believe most Jewish women are that inclined to intermarry, that’s not how most women are, women typically prefer their own men (as the first choice). So this shouldn’t even be an issue.

    In the Diaspora, especially here in the US, a lot of Jewish women do in fact intermarry, especially among non-Orthodox Jewish women. This isn’t 1900 or even 1950 any longer.

    Girls have better grades because they follow instructions better and girls want to please the teachers more. But I’m sure she was very smart, I already read pretty serious books around that age. Such as The Count of Monte Cristo and similar. What books did she read at that age?

    Unlike myself, she has always enjoyed reading interesting fiction books. I myself prefer to watch fictional movies instead, along with of course watching historical movies and reading historical books.

    If you’re going to do the whole MGTOW thing and have more than one child, I would suggest that you avoid splitting siblings – that’s very cruel and amoral. They do eventually find each other and this is very hurtful, tragic. Maybe it’s possible to find an adoptive family that will take one baby and you can let them know that one or two more children are coming. Most couples prefer adopting just one very young child, but there are also plenty who take several siblings and even teenage siblings. So you should be able to find someone like that.

    Yes, I know that it’s extremely important not to separate biological siblings. I’ll also try producing all of them with the same egg donor if at all possible.

    Well, you’re not dumb, I’ll give you that, but every child is a blessing regardless of how smart they are. Every child should be loved, regardless of their brain power. Although smart kids are great. Getting outsmarted by a child is really funny. 🙂

    Many parents don’t like dull children, as evidenced by them being very eager to abort fetuses with Down’s syndrome. There was even a case where an Australian couple did surrogacy in Thailand and had twins, one of whom had Down’s syndrome and was thus left behind in Thailand while they took his healthy twin brother back home to Australia with them:

    https://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/aug/01/baby-downs-syndrome-abandoned-thailand-australian-donations

    At least his adoptive (surrogate) mother subsequently managed to secure Australian citizenship for this Down’s syndrome baby, thankfully:

    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-australia-30892258

    • Replies: @RadicalCenter
    @Mr. XYZ

    This ain't rocket science. The parents chose to have sex (or otherwise conceive, in the case of IUI and IVF), and that act caused the new human being to come into existence.

    Murdering that innocent, helpless human being because they will be hard to care for, and don't meet the expectations of the parents, is the height of evil.

    Abandoning the human being once he or she is born is vicious immoral behavior too -- the height of selfishness and disloyalty.

    People who do this, and a society that allows this, should fear punishment by God.

  1133. @Mr. XYZ
    @LatW


    There are various cuisines as well as many fusion restaurants. But that’s not even that important since most people prefer local food. I really don’t see how the availability of an exotic cuisine is in any way a necessity. Especially when one can travel to London any time and go to one of the food courts there.

     

    Britain still allows visa-free travel for EU nationals? If so, it's still worth noting that travelling 1,000 miles to Britain is expensive (you need plane tickets) and it's much easier to go to an Indian restaurant nearby.

    I certainly wouldn't want to travel to Texas, let alone to New York, for Indian food. Heck, I'm not even willing to shop at Sam's Club because the drive is too long from me. And I like Sam's Club! I go to Costco instead. Which isn't bad, but I don't have the option of trying out Sam's Club instead. The one in our area closed over a decade ago, unfortunately.


    Even if it were, that’s no excuse to fill it up with foreigners. Nobody is entitled to anybody’s land or any other property. Were you not raised to know this very basic rule?
     
    Ilya Somin (a Jewish US libertarian law professor of ex-USSR descent) argues that the current citizens of nation-states are not entitled to them because many of them have a history of force and/or coercion. He literally makes this argument in his 2020 book Free to Move. Of course, using his logic (and he himself does not actually go that far), one could argue that a lot of private property is illegitimate because it also has a history of force and/or coercion.

    Of course, I'm sure that you will use him to argue why the West needs to be warier of Jews who don't have its own best interests at heart. Honestly, I don't fully buy Ilya Somin's logic, though I do support a generous immigration policy for culturally compatible people, including for my birth country of Israel, where I think that an influx of skilled non-Jewish immigrants could do a decent job of curbing the excessive Jewish chauvinism that is currently going on there:

    https://mosaicmagazine.com/essay/israel-zionism/2023/07/the-looming-war-over-israels-law-of-return/


    There is nothing “to spare”. It already belongs to somebody. But it can be shared with nice people like Ukrainians.
     
    And Indians aren't nice people, even excluding their Muslims?

    As to space, the Baltic people need a lot of it. Are you kidding? A traditional Baltic homestead contains several buildings, lots of acreage, some forest, maybe a little pond. That’s the bare minimum. So no, there is not much to spare. Besides, it’s good to have extra territory, especially when it comes to arable soil and forest, you don’t want to overuse it but want to leave it for posterity. It must be maintained in a sustainable way. Do you seriously not know these basic things?

    Russia has lots of empty space, too, so what? Look up the map Russia at night, 80% of it is empty. But that’s good, because it’s good for sustainability and for posterity.
     

    Balts mostly don't live in rural areas anymore, though. And Yes, forests, et cetera need to be preserved, but even so, there is still a lot of space for urban expansion. Riga metro's size could be doubled, if not tripled, for instance.

    Aw, I didn’t realize your sibling was that young at the time. In that case, of course no, forget it. 🙂 But that’s the right age to start learning to share. 🙂 I think it’s a good age to teach a Jewish boy to share with a Gypsy boy, right? 🙂
     
    I never actually said that my younger sibling was male, now did I? ;) Please don't assume! ;)

    Replies: @LatW, @John Johnson

    Ilya Somin (a Jewish US libertarian law professor of ex-USSR descent) argues that the current citizens of nation-states are not entitled to them because many of them have a history of force and/or coercion.

    That view fits with libertarian beliefs on citizenship as they never made logical sense in the first place.

    Ayn Rand, the original Jewish libertarian argued that all nations need to keep their borders open to sacred individuals from third world countries.

    On the issue of Israel she argued that the Arabs are actually savages like American Indians and the Israelis were an advanced civilization.

    Let me sum up Rand’s position on immigration:

    African immigrants to America/Europe – Let in those precious individuals or you are the worst form of collectivist.
    Arabs in Israel – Kick them out cause they’re f-ckin savages.

    As a friendly reminder the current libertarian party supports legal crack, full auto machine guns for Black felons, 9 month abortions and open borders. All in their platform at lp.org.

    Oh and if anyone knows the quote where Rand says we should lie about race if it exists then please share it.

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    @John Johnson


    Arabs in Israel – Kick them out cause they’re f-ckin savages.
     
    I wonder if she would have at least supported this Jewish guy's proposal:

    https://jewishjournal.com/commentary/opinion/232143/israel-should-open-judaism-to-refugees/
    , @Wokechoke
    @John Johnson

    You sound so reasonably racist. Yet everything you actually end up advocating is liberal policy.

  1134. @John Johnson
    @Mr. XYZ

    Ilya Somin (a Jewish US libertarian law professor of ex-USSR descent) argues that the current citizens of nation-states are not entitled to them because many of them have a history of force and/or coercion.

    That view fits with libertarian beliefs on citizenship as they never made logical sense in the first place.

    Ayn Rand, the original Jewish libertarian argued that all nations need to keep their borders open to sacred individuals from third world countries.

    On the issue of Israel she argued that the Arabs are actually savages like American Indians and the Israelis were an advanced civilization.

    Let me sum up Rand's position on immigration:

    African immigrants to America/Europe - Let in those precious individuals or you are the worst form of collectivist.
    Arabs in Israel - Kick them out cause they're f-ckin savages.

    As a friendly reminder the current libertarian party supports legal crack, full auto machine guns for Black felons, 9 month abortions and open borders. All in their platform at lp.org.

    Oh and if anyone knows the quote where Rand says we should lie about race if it exists then please share it.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Wokechoke

    Arabs in Israel – Kick them out cause they’re f-ckin savages.

    I wonder if she would have at least supported this Jewish guy’s proposal:

    https://jewishjournal.com/commentary/opinion/232143/israel-should-open-judaism-to-refugees/

  1135. @Mr. Hack
    @QCIC

    The US finally backs the right horse in the world today. Once it helps Ukraine to completely maintain its autonomy it will regain its former moral superiority. Ukraine hasn't even received the F-16's promised, so we're far, far away from US involvement with boots on the ground. So, you may go back to your bong and resume playing "Senryaku VII" (US vs Russia fighting it out in Eurasia) on your living room couch on PS2, Lad. :-)

    https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/51bNU+VKfIL.jpg

    Replies: @QCIC, @RadicalCenter

    People who disagree with me are dumb, and they smoke a lotta weed and play video games, all of them. Huh-huh, huh-huh, huh-huh.

    Fuck yourself, “lad.”

    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @RadicalCenter

    https://cdn.imgbin.com/20/13/6/imgbin-wiz-khalifa-s-weed-farm-weed-game-weed-firm-2-back-to-college-ganja-farmer-weed-empire-android-cUd77WfCKxsz1f1XwE8qFSC6J.jpg

    Go for it Man...enjoy your ganja and keep on blazzin!

    Replies: @songbird, @RadicalCenter, @RadicalCenter

  1136. @RadicalCenter
    @Mr. Hack

    People who disagree with me are dumb, and they smoke a lotta weed and play video games, all of them. Huh-huh, huh-huh, huh-huh.

    Fuck yourself, "lad."

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

    Go for it Man…enjoy your ganja and keep on blazzin!

    • Replies: @songbird
    @Mr. Hack

    Did not realize you were an enthusiast for turn-based strategy games. Do you have any favorites?

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

    , @RadicalCenter
    @Mr. Hack

    I'll stack my family, career, and principles up against yours any day, you uptight unrealistic ignoramus. Are your other views similarly out-of-date and simplistic?

    And you did not spell "blazin'" correctly, with one "z."

    Now go back to your viewing of Reefer Madness.

    , @RadicalCenter
    @Mr. Hack

    P.S. I do hafta admit, I think I smoked with this guy behind the Greyhound station in Ventura. He sold me a dime bag. With inflation, though, it cost more like $25.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

  1137. @Mr. Hack
    @RadicalCenter

    https://cdn.imgbin.com/20/13/6/imgbin-wiz-khalifa-s-weed-farm-weed-game-weed-firm-2-back-to-college-ganja-farmer-weed-empire-android-cUd77WfCKxsz1f1XwE8qFSC6J.jpg

    Go for it Man...enjoy your ganja and keep on blazzin!

    Replies: @songbird, @RadicalCenter, @RadicalCenter

    Did not realize you were an enthusiast for turn-based strategy games. Do you have any favorites?

    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @songbird

    Nah, I just found this depiction of a happy pot head and thought that RadicalCenter would like it.

    Long ago I used to really enjoy playing the Need for Speed franchise games, and some golf ones too.

    I gave it all up long ago. My new environment made me focus on other priorities. How about you?

    Replies: @songbird

  1138. @silviosilver

    If Shiah and Sunni Muslims can collaborate in the falling RusFed, if Turan and Iran unite their forces, then the future global Caliphate is rapidly becoming inevitable.
     
    Sure, on paper, or if this were a video game, it looks like the right move.

    But in the real world, in which people are motivated by a whole lot besides their spiritual commitments to honoring their haplogroups (or whatever the precise formulation you prefer to describe your own motives), calling that scenario far-fetched is the most charitable thing that could be said about it.

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @RadicalCenter

    From my as-yet limited knowledge of the types of Muslims in the Russian Federation, and in the central Asian countries who supply the lion’s share of Muslim immigrants to the RF, the Sunni-Shia divide should not pose any significant obstacle to unified Turkic Muslim efforts (if such develops) to increase their political power and influence in “Russia.”

    The countries with significant Shia populations simply haven’t sent, and don’t send, many immigrants to the RF at all: primarily Iran but also Azerbaijan, Iraq, Yemen, and because of their sheer size India and Pakistan.

    Conversely, the central-Asian countries that continue to supply so many immigrants to the RF are overwhelmingly Sunni, with very low percentages of Shia: Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan. Same with Kyrgyzstan and Turkmenistan, which apparently supply a lesser number / proportion of immigrants to the RF.

    The largest single Muslim group in Russia, the Tatars, are solid-majority Sunni as well. Same with the much smaller group, the Bashkir.

    In the Caucasus, Russia’s almost-all-Muslim Chechen and Dagestani republics are likewise Sunni, not Shia, with only Dagestan having a Shia minority.

    Seems we can conclude that the Muslim population of Russia, no matter their origin, are overwhelmingly Sunni. Shia play correspondingly little role in Russian life and would have no realistic claim to power anywhere in the RF.

    It seems that Chechnya is the only jurisdiction in the RF with a fertility rate above replacement level (albeit much lower than it was only a couple decades ago). That contrasts to Slavic Russians, who have a terribly low fertility rate that shows little sign of adequate improvement. Combining the small Islamizing effect of Chechnya’s growth with the larger Islamizing effect of continuing central-Asiasn Turkic immigration, Russia is on track to become slowly but steadily more Muslim, at least nominally.

    If these fertility and immigration trends don’t change much, Christianity will inevitably become relatively less important and not as clearly dominant over the next two generations. There will be ever fewer Slavic Christian women of safe childbearing age in the RF, and ever more younger women from nominally Muslim families in the RF. The ratio of Muslim:Christian in the RF can start to change faster as this difference makes itself felt.

    I’d welcome correction or additional information from Russian and/or Muslim people. Thank you –

  1139. @Mr. Hack
    @RadicalCenter

    https://cdn.imgbin.com/20/13/6/imgbin-wiz-khalifa-s-weed-farm-weed-game-weed-firm-2-back-to-college-ganja-farmer-weed-empire-android-cUd77WfCKxsz1f1XwE8qFSC6J.jpg

    Go for it Man...enjoy your ganja and keep on blazzin!

    Replies: @songbird, @RadicalCenter, @RadicalCenter

    I’ll stack my family, career, and principles up against yours any day, you uptight unrealistic ignoramus. Are your other views similarly out-of-date and simplistic?

    And you did not spell “blazin’” correctly, with one “z.”

    Now go back to your viewing of Reefer Madness.

  1140. @Mr. Hack
    @RadicalCenter

    https://cdn.imgbin.com/20/13/6/imgbin-wiz-khalifa-s-weed-farm-weed-game-weed-firm-2-back-to-college-ganja-farmer-weed-empire-android-cUd77WfCKxsz1f1XwE8qFSC6J.jpg

    Go for it Man...enjoy your ganja and keep on blazzin!

    Replies: @songbird, @RadicalCenter, @RadicalCenter

    P.S. I do hafta admit, I think I smoked with this guy behind the Greyhound station in Ventura. He sold me a dime bag. With inflation, though, it cost more like $25.

    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @RadicalCenter


    "There's a sucker born every minute"
     
    Or:

    A fool and a dollar are soon departed
     
    A great example of what a family man does in his spare time:

    "P.S. I do hafta admit, I think I smoked with this guy behind the Greyhound station"

    I hope that you didn't share a dirty needle with this guy?

    Replies: @RadicalCenter

  1141. @RadicalCenter
    @Mr. Hack

    P.S. I do hafta admit, I think I smoked with this guy behind the Greyhound station in Ventura. He sold me a dime bag. With inflation, though, it cost more like $25.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

    “There’s a sucker born every minute”

    Or:

    A fool and a dollar are soon departed

    A great example of what a family man does in his spare time:

    “P.S. I do hafta admit, I think I smoked with this guy behind the Greyhound station”

    I hope that you didn’t share a dirty needle with this guy?

    • Replies: @RadicalCenter
    @Mr. Hack

    You're not real bright, are ya. Get a sense of humor rather than taking everything literally.

    Also, the old saying was "are soon parted", not "are soon departed." Or was that a lame attempt at a joke in the context of a bus station.

    And yes, the tens of millions of Americans who have smoked pot usually go on to inject deadly hard drugs, with dirty needles at that. Your observational and analytical abilities, and your grasp of reality, remain unmatched.

    Ironic that you're the one who badly, badly needs to light up -- and lighten the fuck up.
    Now go suck some cop dick. Or was it soldier dick this week.

  1142. @songbird
    @Mr. Hack

    Did not realize you were an enthusiast for turn-based strategy games. Do you have any favorites?

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

    Nah, I just found this depiction of a happy pot head and thought that RadicalCenter would like it.

    Long ago I used to really enjoy playing the Need for Speed franchise games, and some golf ones too.

    I gave it all up long ago. My new environment made me focus on other priorities. How about you?

    • Replies: @songbird
    @Mr. Hack

    Never could get into the pure racing or sports games very much, but I have a nostalgia for certain others.

    One type that has always had a strange appeal to me is where you conquer territory.

    These days my vices are mainly reading and watching movies.

  1143. @Mr. Hack
    @RadicalCenter


    "There's a sucker born every minute"
     
    Or:

    A fool and a dollar are soon departed
     
    A great example of what a family man does in his spare time:

    "P.S. I do hafta admit, I think I smoked with this guy behind the Greyhound station"

    I hope that you didn't share a dirty needle with this guy?

    Replies: @RadicalCenter

    You’re not real bright, are ya. Get a sense of humor rather than taking everything literally.

    Also, the old saying was “are soon parted”, not “are soon departed.” Or was that a lame attempt at a joke in the context of a bus station.

    And yes, the tens of millions of Americans who have smoked pot usually go on to inject deadly hard drugs, with dirty needles at that. Your observational and analytical abilities, and your grasp of reality, remain unmatched.

    Ironic that you’re the one who badly, badly needs to light up — and lighten the fuck up.
    Now go suck some cop dick. Or was it soldier dick this week.

  1144. @John Johnson
    @Mr. XYZ

    Ilya Somin (a Jewish US libertarian law professor of ex-USSR descent) argues that the current citizens of nation-states are not entitled to them because many of them have a history of force and/or coercion.

    That view fits with libertarian beliefs on citizenship as they never made logical sense in the first place.

    Ayn Rand, the original Jewish libertarian argued that all nations need to keep their borders open to sacred individuals from third world countries.

    On the issue of Israel she argued that the Arabs are actually savages like American Indians and the Israelis were an advanced civilization.

    Let me sum up Rand's position on immigration:

    African immigrants to America/Europe - Let in those precious individuals or you are the worst form of collectivist.
    Arabs in Israel - Kick them out cause they're f-ckin savages.

    As a friendly reminder the current libertarian party supports legal crack, full auto machine guns for Black felons, 9 month abortions and open borders. All in their platform at lp.org.

    Oh and if anyone knows the quote where Rand says we should lie about race if it exists then please share it.

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @Wokechoke

    You sound so reasonably racist. Yet everything you actually end up advocating is liberal policy.

  1145. @Mr. XYZ
    @talkative

    This is the kind of pussy that Anatoly prefers to stroke lol:

    https://images.unsplash.com/photo-1606425270259-998c37268501?ixlib=rb-4.0.3&ixid=M3wxMjA3fDB8MHxzZWFyY2h8MXx8cHVzc3ljYXR8ZW58MHx8MHx8fDA%3D&w=1000&q=80

    Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @RadicalCenter

    I expected to see a pic of Sailer.

  1146. @Mr. Hack
    @songbird

    Nah, I just found this depiction of a happy pot head and thought that RadicalCenter would like it.

    Long ago I used to really enjoy playing the Need for Speed franchise games, and some golf ones too.

    I gave it all up long ago. My new environment made me focus on other priorities. How about you?

    Replies: @songbird

    Never could get into the pure racing or sports games very much, but I have a nostalgia for certain others.

    One type that has always had a strange appeal to me is where you conquer territory.

    These days my vices are mainly reading and watching movies.

  1147. @LatW
    @Mr. XYZ


    Immigrants do likely increase the amount of diverse foods that one is exposed to, though.
     
    The value of diverse foods do not trump the purity and continuity of one's ethnostate. Not even comparable in importance. America is a young country so it might be a different case.

    Does Latvia have great Latin American food in spite of it having virtually no Latin Americans, for instance?
     
    There are a lot of excellent chefs so it's possible to find one who will happily prepare Latin American food. For example, there are people who have worked in hospitality in places such as Brazil, helping run restaurants there. So there are people who are well versed in different cuisines and there are a ton of nice restaurants. There are sommeliers who have worked in France and there are all kinds of international cocktail mixing competitions and what not.

    You don’t believe that people who are fresh off the boat should have a right to help determine their countries’ policies, even if they have citizenship?
     
    They can provide input, but I don't think they should decide on important matters (only heritage Americans should, although sometimes heritage Americans have bad ideas). However, the US as a country is much more generous and gracious than that. All the more reason to shelter the US.

    DNA testing removes the value of this tradition.
     
    Not really, DNA testing does not trump Torah. Besides, this is a nice way to highlight the sanctity of motherhood, the European culture seems to respect the patrilineal aspect more, which is important but it has always felt one sided. I like how the Jewish culture sheds a different light on it.

    How so when it gives Jewish women a carte blanche to intermarry without giving an equivalent carte blanche to Jewish men?
     
    I don't believe most Jewish women are that inclined to intermarry, that's not how most women are, women typically prefer their own men (as the first choice). So this shouldn't even be an issue.

    Her brainpower was already evident back when she was 12 or 13 years old and her grades in all of her classes were near 100%–as in, near-perfect.
     
    Girls have better grades because they follow instructions better and girls want to please the teachers more. But I'm sure she was very smart, I already read pretty serious books around that age. Such as The Count of Monte Cristo and similar. What books did she read at that age?

    eventually going to Mexico and reproducing with the help of a couple of egg donors and Mexican surrogates and then giving the resulting children up for adoption in the form of an open adoption so that I could still maintain a relationship with them
     
    If you're going to do the whole MGTOW thing and have more than one child, I would suggest that you avoid splitting siblings - that's very cruel and amoral. They do eventually find each other and this is very hurtful, tragic. Maybe it's possible to find an adoptive family that will take one baby and you can let them know that one or two more children are coming. Most couples prefer adopting just one very young child, but there are also plenty who take several siblings and even teenage siblings. So you should be able to find someone like that.

    As a side note, I certainly think that the US could always benefit from having more smart people. 🙂
     
    Well, you're not dumb, I'll give you that, but every child is a blessing regardless of how smart they are. Every child should be loved, regardless of their brain power. Although smart kids are great. Getting outsmarted by a child is really funny. :)

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @RadicalCenter, @RadicalCenter

    So much to enjoy and ponder in your comment, as usual 🙂

    A note about the joy of having so many of the world’s cuisines at your fingertips in your own area, prepared by natives of those other countries. We have lived in SoCal for well over a decade, and that is one of our favorite things about the region.

    BUT: there is no “need” to hand out citizenship to millions (tens of millions) of people from very different cultures just to get access to their cuisine. Merely offering permanent residence to foreigners to start their restaurant businesses here would induce them to come and offer their delicious foods in our cities.

    They would not get the right to vote or run for office, nor to donate to or work for political candidates or parties or PACs, nor the right to hold any government positions.

    Nor should their children born during their stay here, get “birthright” citizenship.

    Moreover, people who are allowed permanent residence for this purpose should be required to hire mostly native-born US Citizens to staff their restaurants. That sure as Hell does not look to be the case in most of the Chinese, Thai, Vietnamese, and Japanese restaurants that we frequent.

    In short, let them come here as permanent residents, treat them well, but never give them the right to become citizens, to vote, or in any way to influence our laws and government; the “right” to import more people from their countries to work in their businesses rather than our own native-born citizens; or the “right” to bring their elderly relatives (who will then receive hundreds of thousands of dollars each, if not millions of dollars each, of medical care at our taxpayer expense through Medicare).

    That’s how you get the world’s cuisines and a glimpse of the world’s peoples in our neighborhoods, without being swamped and having our culture and laws forever transformed against our will.

    It’s too late to undo most of the damage done, however, and in many cities and States there are now too many people here who will never go along with changing to such a system. But let’s not pretend we had to give away our country and become a balkanized boarding house to the world, just to get better food choices.

  1148. @LatW
    @Mr. XYZ


    Immigrants do likely increase the amount of diverse foods that one is exposed to, though.
     
    The value of diverse foods do not trump the purity and continuity of one's ethnostate. Not even comparable in importance. America is a young country so it might be a different case.

    Does Latvia have great Latin American food in spite of it having virtually no Latin Americans, for instance?
     
    There are a lot of excellent chefs so it's possible to find one who will happily prepare Latin American food. For example, there are people who have worked in hospitality in places such as Brazil, helping run restaurants there. So there are people who are well versed in different cuisines and there are a ton of nice restaurants. There are sommeliers who have worked in France and there are all kinds of international cocktail mixing competitions and what not.

    You don’t believe that people who are fresh off the boat should have a right to help determine their countries’ policies, even if they have citizenship?
     
    They can provide input, but I don't think they should decide on important matters (only heritage Americans should, although sometimes heritage Americans have bad ideas). However, the US as a country is much more generous and gracious than that. All the more reason to shelter the US.

    DNA testing removes the value of this tradition.
     
    Not really, DNA testing does not trump Torah. Besides, this is a nice way to highlight the sanctity of motherhood, the European culture seems to respect the patrilineal aspect more, which is important but it has always felt one sided. I like how the Jewish culture sheds a different light on it.

    How so when it gives Jewish women a carte blanche to intermarry without giving an equivalent carte blanche to Jewish men?
     
    I don't believe most Jewish women are that inclined to intermarry, that's not how most women are, women typically prefer their own men (as the first choice). So this shouldn't even be an issue.

    Her brainpower was already evident back when she was 12 or 13 years old and her grades in all of her classes were near 100%–as in, near-perfect.
     
    Girls have better grades because they follow instructions better and girls want to please the teachers more. But I'm sure she was very smart, I already read pretty serious books around that age. Such as The Count of Monte Cristo and similar. What books did she read at that age?

    eventually going to Mexico and reproducing with the help of a couple of egg donors and Mexican surrogates and then giving the resulting children up for adoption in the form of an open adoption so that I could still maintain a relationship with them
     
    If you're going to do the whole MGTOW thing and have more than one child, I would suggest that you avoid splitting siblings - that's very cruel and amoral. They do eventually find each other and this is very hurtful, tragic. Maybe it's possible to find an adoptive family that will take one baby and you can let them know that one or two more children are coming. Most couples prefer adopting just one very young child, but there are also plenty who take several siblings and even teenage siblings. So you should be able to find someone like that.

    As a side note, I certainly think that the US could always benefit from having more smart people. 🙂
     
    Well, you're not dumb, I'll give you that, but every child is a blessing regardless of how smart they are. Every child should be loved, regardless of their brain power. Although smart kids are great. Getting outsmarted by a child is really funny. :)

    Replies: @Mr. XYZ, @RadicalCenter, @RadicalCenter

    So much to enjoy and ponder in your comment 🙂

    Allow me to pitch the Cuisine and Culture Visa, colloquially the Restaurant Visa.

    A note about the joy of having so many of the world’s cuisines at your fingertips in your own area, prepared by natives of those other countries. We have lived in SoCal for well over a decade, and that is one of our favorite things about the region.

    BUT: there is no “need” to hand out citizenship to millions (tens of millions) of people from very different cultures just to get access to their cuisine. Merely offering permanent residence to foreigners to start their restaurant businesses here would induce plenty of them to come and offer their delicious foods in our cities.

    They would not get the right to vote or run for office,
    to donate to or work for political candidates or parties or PACs,
    to hold any government employment,
    to receive any loans or incentives from any level of government,
    or to receive food stamps, Medicare, unemployment benefits, or any other taxpayer-funded programs.

    Nor should their children born during their stay here, get “birthright” citizenship.

    Moreover, people who are allowed permanent residence for this purpose should be required to hire mostly native-born US Citizens to staff the non-chef jobs in their restaurants. That sure as Hell does not look to be the case in most of the e.g. Chinese, Thai, Vietnamese, and Japanese restaurants that we frequent.

    In short, let them come here as permanent residents, treat them well, but never give them the right to become citizens, to vote, or in any way to influence our laws and government; the “right” to import more people from their countries to work in their businesses rather than our own native-born citizens; or the “right” to bring their elderly relatives (who will then receive hundreds of thousands of dollars each, if not millions of dollars each, of medical care at our taxpayer expense through Medicare).

    That’s how you get the world’s cuisines and a glimpse of the world’s peoples in our neighborhoods, without being swamped and having our culture and laws forever transformed against our will.

    It’s too late to undo most of the damage done, however, and in many cities and States there are now too many people here who will never go along with changing to such a system. But let’s not pretend we had to give away our country and become a balkanized boarding house to the world, just to get better food choices.

    …………….

    PS as a single man, my friends and I used to joke about ending mass immigration but allowing a limited visa only for attractive young women, NO MEN. We called it The Hottie Visa. But I digress.

  1149. @Mr. XYZ
    @LatW


    The value of diverse foods do not trump the purity and continuity of one’s ethnostate. Not even comparable in importance. America is a young country so it might be a different case.
     
    If you and your people want to have an ethno-state, then I won't force diversity on you. Your country already has some diversity due to its huge Slavic population, though.

    There are a lot of excellent chefs so it’s possible to find one who will happily prepare Latin American food. For example, there are people who have worked in hospitality in places such as Brazil, helping run restaurants there. So there are people who are well versed in different cuisines and there are a ton of nice restaurants. There are sommeliers who have worked in France and there are all kinds of international cocktail mixing competitions and what not.
     
    Interesting.

    They can provide input, but I don’t think they should decide on important matters (only heritage Americans should, although sometimes heritage Americans have bad ideas). However, the US as a country is much more generous and gracious than that. All the more reason to shelter the US.

     

    Shelter the US from whom?

    Not really, DNA testing does not trump Torah. Besides, this is a nice way to highlight the sanctity of motherhood, the European culture seems to respect the patrilineal aspect more, which is important but it has always felt one sided. I like how the Jewish culture sheds a different light on it.
     
    The matrilineal rule isn't in the Torah but rather in the Mishnah. This is why Karaites don't follow it. They reject the authority of the Mishnah and only follow the Torah.

    And are you assuming that males cannot play the role of the mother in terms of nurturing their babies? Eventually, biological males (trans women and non-binary people, at least) could even get uterus transplants, most likely. And eventually in-vitro gametogenesis will also allow artificial eggs to be made from men's skin cells and artificial sperm to be made from women's skin cells. Seriously.

    Patrilineal descent in Europe is primarily important when it comes to family names and historically when it came to royal succession rights in a lot of places. For instance, France had historically only allowed male agnatic descendants of Hugh Capet to inherit the French throne.


    I don’t believe most Jewish women are that inclined to intermarry, that’s not how most women are, women typically prefer their own men (as the first choice). So this shouldn’t even be an issue.

     

    In the Diaspora, especially here in the US, a lot of Jewish women do in fact intermarry, especially among non-Orthodox Jewish women. This isn't 1900 or even 1950 any longer.

    Girls have better grades because they follow instructions better and girls want to please the teachers more. But I’m sure she was very smart, I already read pretty serious books around that age. Such as The Count of Monte Cristo and similar. What books did she read at that age?

     

    Unlike myself, she has always enjoyed reading interesting fiction books. I myself prefer to watch fictional movies instead, along with of course watching historical movies and reading historical books.

    If you’re going to do the whole MGTOW thing and have more than one child, I would suggest that you avoid splitting siblings – that’s very cruel and amoral. They do eventually find each other and this is very hurtful, tragic. Maybe it’s possible to find an adoptive family that will take one baby and you can let them know that one or two more children are coming. Most couples prefer adopting just one very young child, but there are also plenty who take several siblings and even teenage siblings. So you should be able to find someone like that.
     
    Yes, I know that it's extremely important not to separate biological siblings. I'll also try producing all of them with the same egg donor if at all possible.

    Well, you’re not dumb, I’ll give you that, but every child is a blessing regardless of how smart they are. Every child should be loved, regardless of their brain power. Although smart kids are great. Getting outsmarted by a child is really funny. 🙂
     
    Many parents don't like dull children, as evidenced by them being very eager to abort fetuses with Down's syndrome. There was even a case where an Australian couple did surrogacy in Thailand and had twins, one of whom had Down's syndrome and was thus left behind in Thailand while they took his healthy twin brother back home to Australia with them:

    https://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/aug/01/baby-downs-syndrome-abandoned-thailand-australian-donations

    At least his adoptive (surrogate) mother subsequently managed to secure Australian citizenship for this Down's syndrome baby, thankfully:

    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-australia-30892258

    Replies: @RadicalCenter

    This ain’t rocket science. The parents chose to have sex (or otherwise conceive, in the case of IUI and IVF), and that act caused the new human being to come into existence.

    Murdering that innocent, helpless human being because they will be hard to care for, and don’t meet the expectations of the parents, is the height of evil.

    Abandoning the human being once he or she is born is vicious immoral behavior too — the height of selfishness and disloyalty.

    People who do this, and a society that allows this, should fear punishment by God.

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to All Karlin Community Comments via RSS