The previous Open Thread is well over 1,000 comments and apparently getting a little sluggish, so here’s a new one for the Karlin Community.
Given the heavy current focus on the alleged Bucha Massacre, I’ll try to balance out the massive MSM tilt on the case by including these interviews of Scott Ritter and Col. Douglas Macgregor on the subject, which I found quite persuasive, as well as their overall views on the Russia/Ukraine war:
ADDENDUM ON THE MISSILE STRIKE AT KRAMATORSK – STRONG EVIDENCE THAT IT WAS UKRAINIAN:
I originally assumed that the strike at Kramatorsk was from the Russians. But I looked into the claims in this video and was able to verify at least some of them. Can’t say anything conclusive and would welcome a correction. Short thread. pic.twitter.com/W6vSzcxTO7
— Richard Hanania (@RichardHanania) April 9, 2022
— Ron Unz

These tweets by Scott Ritter should probably exclude him from ever being considered an expert on Ukraine:
https://twitter.com/keepinitciviI/status/1511724283252330496?s=20&t=IpDEv8QCFjpIoFIgo6ZmMQ
He is not a pedophile as claimed, but rather someone who was convicted for two separate crimes involving teenagers: of trying to arrange sex with a 16 year old and exposing himself to a 15 year old (fortunately both victims were undercover cops).
He highlights the fact that there seems to be something fundamentally off with Westerners taking the Russian side in this invasion (Anglin is another such character). More normal contrarian types who had previously been backing Russia seem to have backed away, but not people like the deluded Ritter.
Your reply to me was: My reply to that is: Precisely my point. How many Ukrainians would Russia have killed had the Ukrainian resistance equaled in intensity and nature the one Catalans offered (i.e. a few street demonstrations)? Do you really think it is for anyone but the Catalan people to decide what is and is not banned in their own region? I will carry your reasoning back to Ukraine and ask you: should Putin annex Ukraine (incidentally something he did not propose to do), would that be OK as long as he allowed the Ukrainian language and the word "Ukrainian" (incidentally when did he openly vow to ban those)?Replies: @AP
The Biden family connection to Ukraine via Burisma is well known. Look at the other names from those events: (1) How much did the Clinton Foundation receive from Ukraine while she was Secretary of State?
https://i0.wp.com/www.powerlineblog.com/ed-assets/2022/04/Screen-Shot-2022-04-05-at-9.30.25-PM.png
There are large numbers of innocent people suffering on both sides. The best solution would have been heading off this mess before it started.
Alas, the WEF Elites (bold above) tricked Zelensky with unachievable hopes & dreams. In a very real sense, both Russia and Ukraine are victims of outside manipulation.
____
I know few here believe me..... However, there is only one side "winning" this conflict.
The WEF Globalists of Davos are getting what they want most. The war they engineered is providing cover for massive numbers of MENA origin illegals.
The decrease in Ukrainian grain output foreshadows the next EU Elite scam. Open European Borders for a flood of suspiciously well fed "starving" African refugees.
PEACE 😇
__________
(1) https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/10/exclusive-timeline-ties-bidens-soros-even-barack-obama-ukrainian-affairs-starting-2014/Replies: @AP
More importantly can Le Pen do it, perhaps a bit too soon for the full economic effect of Macron's foreign policy choices to be felt, but still there are three weeks after the first round.Replies: @AP
Hey Ron, I don’t think that you or anybody else has the writing skills to try and deflect the blame for this senseless war crime on “Ukrainians Nazis”?
At Least 39 Dead In Russian Rocket Attack On Ukrainian Rail Station

https://www.rferl.org/a/31792658.html
It’s fascinating to watch this pocket of Ukrainian troops and the civilians they are tasked to protect get basted to atoms and see the basic appeal to humanitarianism when they do fail to protect their citizens and refugees. And then Onlookers have to swallow the claim they are winning. I get the idea that Ukrainians are looking for allies and sympathy. On the other hand are Ukrainian troops defending their people or failing to protect them? I can’t quite reconcile the dueling narrative of Strong ukies and the panhandling for weapons in every capital. This isn’t Ukraine winning it is the failure of the Ukraine army.
It seems evident enough to me that things in Ukraine have not exactly gone swimmingly for Russia, though perhaps not as disastrously as some would make ti out. It seems like the Russian maximalists on the thread have gone a bit quiet, and even AK doesn’t seem to be talking about the war on Twitter in nearly the fevered and triumphant tones he was here at the outset. He sounds more realistic now from my quick perusal of his Twitter.
Are there any reliable numbers on Ukrainian losses so far? One keeps hearing about bad Russian losses, much of which seems fairly credible but not much about the proportionality.
The rest is all programming.
https://www.businessinsider.com/zelenskyy-case-study-brave-crisis-management-leadership-ceo-lessons-2022-4
The Dances with Bears guy had a great piece that they put up on Naked Capitalism that Zelensky isn't even in Ukraine, the meeting with the Poland top guy did not happen in Ukraine. The commenters ripped him to pieces. He promised a follow-up answer to all the rips. If that ever happened I missed it.
The whole thing was entertaining to watch as internet flame war. Participating in internet flame wars is almost always a waste of time.Replies: @Barbarossa
While I cannot make the world less grim…
I can offer up some 😁 Open Thread Humor😂
Open [MORE] to see bad helicopter planning … Bad, bad, planning,……
PEACE 😇
I can offer up some 😁 Open Thread Humor😂
Open [MORE] to see bad helicopter planning ... Bad, bad, planning,......
PEACE 😇
https://resources.arcamax.com/newspics/224/22421/2242143.gif
https://i0.wp.com/thefunnyconservative.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/img_2593.jpg
https://cdn.acidcow.com/uploads/posts/2022-02/1646050250_8.gif
https://cdn.acidcow.com/uploads/posts/2022-03/1646652088_1.gif
https://i0.wp.com/thefunnyconservative.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/2A-Just-a-field-trip-back-from-Chicago.jpg?w=640&ssl=1
https://i.imgur.com/XipCopB.jpg
https://cdn.acidcow.com/pics/20220315/1647334044_xuglg4z088.jpg
https://cdn.acidcow.com/uploads/posts/2022-03/1646375696_4.gifReplies: @silviosilver, @Barbarossa
You really think you can pass that “Chicago field trip” (more like urban safari) meme off as “Dems are the real racists”? I take it that is the intention, since a good little anti-racist like you wouldn’t dream of drawing attention to negrofuxxation per se.
The fact that you went where you did.... That says a great deal about you.
PEACE 😇Replies: @silviosilver, @WizardWhoKnocks
Are there any reliable numbers on Ukrainian losses so far? One keeps hearing about bad Russian losses, much of which seems fairly credible but not much about the proportionality.Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
There is no reliable number on anything. With one itsy-bitsy-teeny-tiny exception. If you personally know somebody you trust on the ground there they can reliably inform you what is happening in the neighborhood of their house/apartment/&c.
The rest is all programming.
https://www.businessinsider.com/zelenskyy-case-study-brave-crisis-management-leadership-ceo-lessons-2022-4
The Dances with Bears guy had a great piece that they put up on Naked Capitalism that Zelensky isn’t even in Ukraine, the meeting with the Poland top guy did not happen in Ukraine. The commenters ripped him to pieces. He promised a follow-up answer to all the rips. If that ever happened I missed it.
The whole thing was entertaining to watch as internet flame war. Participating in internet flame wars is almost always a waste of time.
From your comment in the last thread...
Thanks for the book recommendation. I looked up the title "Esotericism and the Academy: Rejected Knowledge in Western Culture" as well as the author Wouter Hanegraaff. He actually looks to be a legit scholar so the book may be a worthwhile read. Have you read it, or just heard the author on the podcast?
I tend to be wary of anything that gets into the occult/ esoteric knowledge, not because I think it's necessarily BS, but because there is so much absolute garbage out there concerning any of it.
The last such book that was recommended to me was the improbably named "Secret History of the World".
https://www.amazon.com/Secret-History-World-Mark-Booth/dp/1590201620
It was exceptionally bad as a coherent narrative and "scholarship" although I suppose it was entertaining enough as a laugh. I didn't finish it, as I couldn't give it that much of my time, in the end.
Wouter Hanegraaff looks potentially interesting though. The title you mentioned is a rather pricey buy at $60+ but I may look it up in one of the college libraries, or see if any of his other books are more moderately priced.
Thanks again for the recommendation!Replies: @AaronB, @songbird, @Emil Nikola Richard
https://twitter.com/keepinitciviI/status/1511724283252330496?s=20&t=IpDEv8QCFjpIoFIgo6ZmMQ
He is not a pedophile as claimed, but rather someone who was convicted for two separate crimes involving teenagers: of trying to arrange sex with a 16 year old and exposing himself to a 15 year old (fortunately both victims were undercover cops).
He highlights the fact that there seems to be something fundamentally off with Westerners taking the Russian side in this invasion (Anglin is another such character). More normal contrarian types who had previously been backing Russia seem to have backed away, but not people like the deluded Ritter.Replies: @Brás Cubas, @A123, @LondonBob
AP, this is a continuation of our dialogue from the previous open thread.
Your reply to me was:
My reply to that is:
Precisely my point. How many Ukrainians would Russia have killed had the Ukrainian resistance equaled in intensity and nature the one Catalans offered (i.e. a few street demonstrations)?
Do you really think it is for anyone but the Catalan people to decide what is and is not banned in their own region? I will carry your reasoning back to Ukraine and ask you: should Putin annex Ukraine (incidentally something he did not propose to do), would that be OK as long as he allowed the Ukrainian language and the word “Ukrainian” (incidentally when did he openly vow to ban those)?
Replies: @Brás Cubas
https://twitter.com/keepinitciviI/status/1511724283252330496?s=20&t=IpDEv8QCFjpIoFIgo6ZmMQ
He is not a pedophile as claimed, but rather someone who was convicted for two separate crimes involving teenagers: of trying to arrange sex with a 16 year old and exposing himself to a 15 year old (fortunately both victims were undercover cops).
He highlights the fact that there seems to be something fundamentally off with Westerners taking the Russian side in this invasion (Anglin is another such character). More normal contrarian types who had previously been backing Russia seem to have backed away, but not people like the deluded Ritter.Replies: @Brás Cubas, @A123, @LondonBob
Terms like “Westerners” is problematic. Which ones?
The Biden family connection to Ukraine via Burisma is well known. Look at the other names from those events: (1)
How much did the Clinton Foundation receive from Ukraine while she was Secretary of State?
There are large numbers of innocent people suffering on both sides. The best solution would have been heading off this mess before it started.
Alas, the WEF Elites (bold above) tricked Zelensky with unachievable hopes & dreams. In a very real sense, both Russia and Ukraine are victims of outside manipulation.
____
I know few here believe me….. However, there is only one side “winning” this conflict.
The WEF Globalists of Davos are getting what they want most. The war they engineered is providing cover for massive numbers of MENA origin illegals.
The decrease in Ukrainian grain output foreshadows the next EU Elite scam. Open European Borders for a flood of suspiciously well fed “starving” African refugees.
PEACE 😇
__________
(1) https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/10/exclusive-timeline-ties-bidens-soros-even-barack-obama-ukrainian-affairs-starting-2014/
Russia’s actions have prompted anyone with at least a basic level of decency* (even Biden, and even Germany though barely) to change course and provide aid to Ukraine but the idea that he has been working on Ukraine’s behalf is silly.
* and opportunism, Russia’s colossal blunder in invading is a golden opportunity to wear down its military and bring its economy downReplies: @A123
Your reply to me was: My reply to that is: Precisely my point. How many Ukrainians would Russia have killed had the Ukrainian resistance equaled in intensity and nature the one Catalans offered (i.e. a few street demonstrations)? Do you really think it is for anyone but the Catalan people to decide what is and is not banned in their own region? I will carry your reasoning back to Ukraine and ask you: should Putin annex Ukraine (incidentally something he did not propose to do), would that be OK as long as he allowed the Ukrainian language and the word "Ukrainian" (incidentally when did he openly vow to ban those)?Replies: @AP
Catalans were not in an independent country with its own army so it’s a false comparison. Though I support their right to independence.
That having been said Russia had a huge amount of armed police and detention wagons coming in, so at the very least it was planning mass arrests in case of an easy conquest.
Russian state media recently released an op-Ed stating that Ukrainian = Nazi and that therefore DeNazification requires erasure of “Ukrainian” and mass killing of Ukrainian elites, who by their nature cannot be cured.
It was intended as humour. Nothing more. Nothing less.
The fact that you went where you did…. That says a great deal about you.
PEACE 😇
That you'd turn tail and run from your "gaff" so quickly also says something about you, cuck boy.Replies: @Yahya, @songbird, @A123
Was using a Russian TTS app called “BalaBolka” the site said this means chatterer.
BalaBolda means same thing in Punjabi. 🙂
TTS apps have been a life-saver for long readings.
Just let it read out, follow along on screen & take notes in separate window. 🙂
ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ
The Biden family connection to Ukraine via Burisma is well known. Look at the other names from those events: (1) How much did the Clinton Foundation receive from Ukraine while she was Secretary of State?
https://i0.wp.com/www.powerlineblog.com/ed-assets/2022/04/Screen-Shot-2022-04-05-at-9.30.25-PM.png
There are large numbers of innocent people suffering on both sides. The best solution would have been heading off this mess before it started.
Alas, the WEF Elites (bold above) tricked Zelensky with unachievable hopes & dreams. In a very real sense, both Russia and Ukraine are victims of outside manipulation.
____
I know few here believe me..... However, there is only one side "winning" this conflict.
The WEF Globalists of Davos are getting what they want most. The war they engineered is providing cover for massive numbers of MENA origin illegals.
The decrease in Ukrainian grain output foreshadows the next EU Elite scam. Open European Borders for a flood of suspiciously well fed "starving" African refugees.
PEACE 😇
__________
(1) https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/10/exclusive-timeline-ties-bidens-soros-even-barack-obama-ukrainian-affairs-starting-2014/Replies: @AP
Most Ukrainian Americans voted for Trump because the Obama administration had been horrible to Ukraine, refusing to sell lethal weapons for years. One of Biden’s first acts as president had been to appease the Germans by ending the sanctions on Nordstream that Trump had put into place. This really made this invasion much more likely.
Russia’s actions have prompted anyone with at least a basic level of decency* (even Biden, and even Germany though barely) to change course and provide aid to Ukraine but the idea that he has been working on Ukraine’s behalf is silly.
* and opportunism, Russia’s colossal blunder in invading is a golden opportunity to wear down its military and bring its economy down
-- Are they Poisoning The Well to make an deal impossible?PEACE 😇
https://twitter.com/keepinitciviI/status/1511724283252330496?s=20&t=IpDEv8QCFjpIoFIgo6ZmMQ
He is not a pedophile as claimed, but rather someone who was convicted for two separate crimes involving teenagers: of trying to arrange sex with a 16 year old and exposing himself to a 15 year old (fortunately both victims were undercover cops).
He highlights the fact that there seems to be something fundamentally off with Westerners taking the Russian side in this invasion (Anglin is another such character). More normal contrarian types who had previously been backing Russia seem to have backed away, but not people like the deluded Ritter.Replies: @Brás Cubas, @A123, @LondonBob
Russia recognised the DPR and LPR, after signing a mutual defence treaty they requested Russian assistance, seems fair enough to me, especially as Ukrainians attacks were accelerating as documented by the OSCE. Silly pretending this war started a few weeks ago, it has been ongoing since 2014, Russia is just ending it after the failure to implement Minsk.
More importantly can Le Pen do it, perhaps a bit too soon for the full economic effect of Macron’s foreign policy choices to be felt, but still there are three weeks after the first round.
The rest is all programming.
https://www.businessinsider.com/zelenskyy-case-study-brave-crisis-management-leadership-ceo-lessons-2022-4
The Dances with Bears guy had a great piece that they put up on Naked Capitalism that Zelensky isn't even in Ukraine, the meeting with the Poland top guy did not happen in Ukraine. The commenters ripped him to pieces. He promised a follow-up answer to all the rips. If that ever happened I missed it.
The whole thing was entertaining to watch as internet flame war. Participating in internet flame wars is almost always a waste of time.Replies: @Barbarossa
I agree and have pretty much stayed out of the flame war myself. It just seem unproductive, even by the low productivity standards of internet chatter!
From your comment in the last thread…
Thanks for the book recommendation. I looked up the title “Esotericism and the Academy: Rejected Knowledge in Western Culture” as well as the author Wouter Hanegraaff. He actually looks to be a legit scholar so the book may be a worthwhile read. Have you read it, or just heard the author on the podcast?
I tend to be wary of anything that gets into the occult/ esoteric knowledge, not because I think it’s necessarily BS, but because there is so much absolute garbage out there concerning any of it.
The last such book that was recommended to me was the improbably named “Secret History of the World”.
It was exceptionally bad as a coherent narrative and “scholarship” although I suppose it was entertaining enough as a laugh. I didn’t finish it, as I couldn’t give it that much of my time, in the end.
Wouter Hanegraaff looks potentially interesting though. The title you mentioned is a rather pricey buy at $60+ but I may look it up in one of the college libraries, or see if any of his other books are more moderately priced.
Thanks again for the recommendation!
It isn't for everybody. I happen to have it at hand so will give a short example. One of my favorite notations is on page 121. A paragraph-long small print quotation, Paul Arnold, quoting Tertulian, quoting Saint Paul.
I don't even know the word for one step beyond a thrice nested quotation. Call it four-nested. (My usual translation (RSV) doesn't put it like that exactly.)
Replies: @Brás Cubas
It is precisely that disparity that allows the comparison to be effective. I suppose you are saying that it rendered Catalan resistance beyond a few demonstrations impossible. I say that in the case of the Ukrainians it is possible but probably futile insofar as their interests are concerned.
Your assuming that they were meant for the “case of an easy conquest” is a matter of speculation, isn’t it? I will possibly change my views about the case for surrender if you provide a reliable and convincing — i.e. strongly argued and/or backed by hard facts — source showing that this was really in Putin’s plans. (I know about his intention of dismantling nationalist armed units. That would not change my views. I don’t think their existence conflates with the interests of the Ukrainian people.)
Well, you addressed my incidental remark, and not the fulcrum of the paragraph. My only observation is that your account is somewhat at odds with other statements by someone from Russia (Lavrov, I think) to the effect that they had no intention of replacing Zelensky as the leader of Ukraine.
At Least 39 Dead In Russian Rocket Attack On Ukrainian Rail Station
https://gdb.rferl.org/051e0000-0aff-0242-fe25-08da1956207b_cx0_cy3_cw0_w1023_r1_s.jpg https://www.rferl.org/a/31792658.htmlReplies: @LondonBob
Tochka U is only used by one side, and only one side would want to prevent the evacuation of civilians to keep them as human shields.
The Russians are just as capable of using civilians as human shields as are the Ukrainians.
Have you ever considered that the Russians don't want the Donbas civilians to leave in mass for several reasons? They're there presumably to help protect the denizens there from being overtaken by the "Nazis". How might it look if they continue to hold on to these areas but yet the majority of its inhabitants have left, mostly to Western Ukraine and further West? It seems that the only story that Kremlinoids have let is to blame every single massacre on the Ukrainian side. If the photos aren't enough proof of what's been going on, you only have to listen to the eye witness accounts of those involved to really find out what happened.Replies: @Wokechoke, @Here Be Dragon, @Mikhail
So “German_reader” has quit in a rage after being provoked one too many times by “Eastern Europeans”, and he singled out Russians as the worst. Though one did get the impression that utu was the one whom he hated most of all.
While I only rarely agreed with him on any issue, I always appreciated his contributions since he often made me reflect even when I disagreed. He was typically civil to a fault and he came across as a learned and well-read man. For this reason, his more recent outbursts were uncharacteristic, and in hindsight probably an early sign of what was about to happen. To my mind, his exit is a loss for this community.
GR seemed to be of a spirit from another age. A man with conservative instincts yet trapped in a hard-left field (Western humanities) – the worst of all combinations. No wonder he suffers so much. It’s sad to see him struggle with unemployment given that he can read Latin and Italian fluently. Not just a tragic waste of human talent but perhaps even more so a condemnation of our materialist and shallow society.
I don’t have anywhere close to the intellectual and historical knowledge of GR. I am certainly not as well-read. By sheer luck and coincidence, I just happen to be good at things which are remunerated handsomely. This hit-or-miss incentive structure is a problem.
I’ve expressed dismay in the past that too many intellectual activities are looked down upon because they do not pay well. I believe that we as a society need to start subsidising arts and humanities scholars to a much greater extent – including those outside the formal university system – even if there is no real financial return. In fact, especially if there is no financial return. It could mean providing them with cheap housing in attractive locations and covering all their book purchasing costs, among other things.
I do not agree with those who castigate and belittle the humanities. Just because Western sociology departments are a joke does not mean that philosophy and literature are invalid or “lesser” fields. A world in which only STEM and finance rules is a crippled existence, devoid of any meaning; a robotic, sterile environment where humanity goes to perish.
As for GR, I sincerely hope he changes his mind. If too many gentle souls leave us, only the nastiest will be a left: a race to the bottom in which there will be no winners.
It has gotten significantly worse around 2010 when there was a concerted effort to elevate STEM to not just a position of dominance - but to a position of absolute and exclusive value, where all other systems of value were radically downgraded.
At the time, I myself did not realize we were taking a radical step forward in the direction Western culture had been travelling in. In hindsight it feels like a milestone.
I am convinced the excellent German Reader will be back! He has left before, and probably just needs a break.
A society that cannot provide a valuable position to someone like German Reader is one that cannot last long.
It's also a very good point on the humanities. They are becoming a sadly distorted and truncated field, but they should have their proper place as the pursuits which make us intellectually and socially rich and which gives depth to our lives.
It's a stupid society which can't find a useful place for a man like GR to exercise his gifts, but elevates idiotic pop stars.
It looks like a comment I made yesterday in the previous thread was sadly prophetical and this blog of AK renegades who didn’t join his call for a barbaric war has now suffered a new split with our best commenter German_reader seemingly leaving the forum.
Thank you utu and your clapping chorus of Ukrainian yihadists for bringing the level of this blog to the Saker’s or Giraldi’s: your level. Note that GR blamed all of you for his departure.
Eight years ago I had the audacity of posting my opinions on the killing of Donbass civilians with my full name on a Ukrainian forum. It was a respectful and reasoned opinion based on purely humanitarian arguments but I received personal death threats. I realized then that there was something toxic in Ukrainian nationalism, all the more so because I could easily recognize it from my own homeland: “join my fight or shut up and don’t dare criticize me or I’ll kill you too”. I’m sure peaceful citizens of Ulster would also have recognized the attitude. Or people living in mafia territories, which is what Kiev was when I visited it in the 90s.
Maybe Ukrainians are just the Irish of Eastern Europe. Except a lot grouchier and with even worse food, if such a thing is even possible.Replies: @Yevardian
More importantly can Le Pen do it, perhaps a bit too soon for the full economic effect of Macron's foreign policy choices to be felt, but still there are three weeks after the first round.Replies: @AP
Yes, this became a war when in 2014 Russia poured in military equipment and volunteers including the leader Girkin into another country. Bombing and murdering thousands of people in places far from Donbas such as in Kharkiv or Kiev’s outskirts was just taking this to a new level.
We live in a world dominated by left hemisphere thinking, where logic and reason are considered the sole means of knowledge, the world of scientism.
It has gotten significantly worse around 2010 when there was a concerted effort to elevate STEM to not just a position of dominance – but to a position of absolute and exclusive value, where all other systems of value were radically downgraded.
At the time, I myself did not realize we were taking a radical step forward in the direction Western culture had been travelling in. In hindsight it feels like a milestone.
I am convinced the excellent German Reader will be back! He has left before, and probably just needs a break.
A society that cannot provide a valuable position to someone like German Reader is one that cannot last long.
Thanks for an interesting post. Agree with the sentiment, German_Reader’s level-headed objectivity and erudition will be missed. Perhaps GR will use his spare time to write a scholarly book on Roman history or something of the like.
The average 320-400 page non-fiction books contains 80,000 to 100,000 words. If you look at the number of words written by long-time commenters of this blog, they range from 200,000 to 1,200,000 million words, with the average being somewhere around 300-400 thousand. That’s 3 times worth of books that could’ve been written had their efforts been directed to it instead of commenting on Unz (obviously it takes more effort to write a scholarly book than blog comments, but you get the picture).
Perhaps the entire internet is a massive psy-ops to keep us all occupied and out of trouble, heh! I'm sure it's much easier to manage populations who have a convenient release valve and get to feel that they are doing something of consequence in the world by posting. This doesn't apply to us so much, since I think we're all pretty comfortable with the fact that our posts affect ziltch outside of the participants in the thread, but it certainly applies to the larger social media world.Replies: @Yevardian
From your comment in the last thread...
Thanks for the book recommendation. I looked up the title "Esotericism and the Academy: Rejected Knowledge in Western Culture" as well as the author Wouter Hanegraaff. He actually looks to be a legit scholar so the book may be a worthwhile read. Have you read it, or just heard the author on the podcast?
I tend to be wary of anything that gets into the occult/ esoteric knowledge, not because I think it's necessarily BS, but because there is so much absolute garbage out there concerning any of it.
The last such book that was recommended to me was the improbably named "Secret History of the World".
https://www.amazon.com/Secret-History-World-Mark-Booth/dp/1590201620
It was exceptionally bad as a coherent narrative and "scholarship" although I suppose it was entertaining enough as a laugh. I didn't finish it, as I couldn't give it that much of my time, in the end.
Wouter Hanegraaff looks potentially interesting though. The title you mentioned is a rather pricey buy at $60+ but I may look it up in one of the college libraries, or see if any of his other books are more moderately priced.
Thanks again for the recommendation!Replies: @AaronB, @songbird, @Emil Nikola Richard
Try this –
http://libgen.rs/search.php?req=Wouter+Hanegraaff&lg_topic=libgen&open=0&view=simple&res=25&phrase=1&column=def
I generally prefer paper books anyways, but if I do download a book on that site that I read and find worthwhile and valuable, I will then buy the book from Amazon or make a financial contribution to the author in some other way, which is only fair, sometimes later when I can more easily afford it.
To me, it is such a brilliant design because it is evocative of so many things. The difficulties to be solved in business and in navigating the right price. "Buyer beware!" And the moral quandaries that money and materialism can create. The potential for runaway greed, or losing sight of what is important.
There were at least a hundred and one great designs like that rooted in history and with moral resonance that the Euro currency could have borrowed. Instead, they chose very sterile designs, intentionally without any people on them. Designs that, I would argue, were evil, and which often replaced better designs, even without needing to delve deeply into the past.Replies: @AaronB, @Barbarossa
Poor writing skills and even poorer thinking skills.
The Russians are just as capable of using civilians as human shields as are the Ukrainians.
Have you ever considered that the Russians don’t want the Donbas civilians to leave in mass for several reasons? They’re there presumably to help protect the denizens there from being overtaken by the “Nazis”. How might it look if they continue to hold on to these areas but yet the majority of its inhabitants have left, mostly to Western Ukraine and further West? It seems that the only story that Kremlinoids have let is to blame every single massacre on the Ukrainian side. If the photos aren’t enough proof of what’s been going on, you only have to listen to the eye witness accounts of those involved to really find out what happened.
And Tochka-U is a Ukrainian missile. This is not the first time Ukrainians hit a civilian area with it. Just a couple of weeks ago one of these landed in the center of Donetsk.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DYmFHbT5HTcReplies: @AP
The April 8 ABC Evening News telecast saw David Muir and the network matter of fact say that Russia launched a deadly missile strike, blatantly omitting the counter claim particulars. Let's see how this one plays out.
https://www.rt.com/russia/553533-kramatorsk-missile-strike-origin/
if a passenger train did get hit, it’s not hard to explain. RUS units are taking out the railroads now. this is something i wondered why they weren’t doing a month ago. but they’re getting around to it. and it’s not hard to believe that one of the missiles out of dozens launched at railroads has accidentally hit civilians and caused a bunch of collateral damage.
indeed, trying to mostly avoid this exact thing could explain why RUS units didn’t just blow up all the railroads in the first couple weeks. they were deliberately not doing that, to allow ukranians all the around the country to leave the area on trains.
so i’d say totally possible a train got blown up, but that’s a normal part of a big war. extremely low chance it was on purpose, very high chance it was just collateral damage. RUS is moving now to limit UKR ability to move units around the country, and US and NATO allies will continue to deliberately force the conflict to get worse by sending equipment into ukraine on railroads. so more of this stuff is likely. next they’ll be sneaking in equipment on trucks or disguised as aid shipments traveling on roads.
https://twitter.com/morphonios/status/1512432902021210114?s=20&t=B_eXUFb3CQfDQc1MH9UwVg
I recall Donetsk in 2012 when the Soccer was hosted there. A bunch of Black players were writing articles about how Racist Ukraine was and how the England team ought not to play there. I’ll have to dig out the sol Campbell article to see if it had MI6 paw prints on it. David Aronovitch was wrong about the color revolutions there as far back as 2004. Imagine your country being turned into a Zhid playground and a player for bleg sportsmen and blaming the Muscovites for it. That’s Azov and the Ultra Nationalists.
The Russians are just as capable of using civilians as human shields as are the Ukrainians.
Have you ever considered that the Russians don't want the Donbas civilians to leave in mass for several reasons? They're there presumably to help protect the denizens there from being overtaken by the "Nazis". How might it look if they continue to hold on to these areas but yet the majority of its inhabitants have left, mostly to Western Ukraine and further West? It seems that the only story that Kremlinoids have let is to blame every single massacre on the Ukrainian side. If the photos aren't enough proof of what's been going on, you only have to listen to the eye witness accounts of those involved to really find out what happened.Replies: @Wokechoke, @Here Be Dragon, @Mikhail
Od guess this is good old American Gulf War style shock n Awe now. Kramatorsk is the rail hub for the entire remainder of the Ukrainian presence in Donbas. I’d be heading West of the Dnieper if this strike is anything to go by.
indeed, trying to mostly avoid this exact thing could explain why RUS units didn't just blow up all the railroads in the first couple weeks. they were deliberately not doing that, to allow ukranians all the around the country to leave the area on trains.
so i'd say totally possible a train got blown up, but that's a normal part of a big war. extremely low chance it was on purpose, very high chance it was just collateral damage. RUS is moving now to limit UKR ability to move units around the country, and US and NATO allies will continue to deliberately force the conflict to get worse by sending equipment into ukraine on railroads. so more of this stuff is likely. next they'll be sneaking in equipment on trucks or disguised as aid shipments traveling on roads.Replies: @Wokechoke, @LondonBob
I mentioned Drogheda and Alesia some weeks back. I see nothing to change that reference. There won’t be anything left of Kramatorsk once the Czar is done.
“poured?” a poetic verb, Makes one wonder what word would you use for others doing the same. It is standard Western modus operandi to send weapons, private trainers and hired mercs all over the world. Are they also “pouring” oil on fire? Hey, they are doing right now in Ukraine…why is only one side allowed to do it?
I agree that we are at a new dangerous level and it is accelerating. All sides allowed an unsustainable mess to fester for 8 years. The world could perish because it was non-negotiable to get Kiev into NATO, even if only as a “principle” and not in reality.
Russia made it possible in 2014 and has accelerated it in 2022.Replies: @Wokechoke, @Mikhail
“Are there any reliable numbers on Ukrainian losses so far?”
there’s no talk about that on this thread, because this isn’t a serious war thread.
“One keeps hearing about bad Russian losses, much of which seems fairly credible but not much about the proportionality.”
no, that’s just western media bias, who are totally, 100% in the tank on this thing for Washington DC and the US State Department. in their world, democrats never lie, cheat, or steal. and UKR units are never destroyed, and have unlimited fuel and ammunition,
for weeks on here there wasn’t even any talk about the actual numbers involved. but the actual numbers are, UKR had about 600,000 defenders, and russian leadership decided that about 200,000 attackers was sufficient to engage them and accomplish their objectives. whether they were correct, we’ll see.
normally this would be a huge advantage for the defenders. but that’s mostly not what’s happening here. UKR units are getting pulverized. if this wasn’t the case, we’d still be seeing those videos of RUS units being destroyed. but that slowed down to a trickle after the first 2 weeks. the reverse is the case – the zelensky government has now made it illegal for ukrainians to record and post internet videos of UKR units getting destroyed. which is mostly what’s happening. note i’m not saying there aren’t lots of videos of UKR units being destroyed every day. there are. just that it’s illegal for ukrainian citizens to post these, for propaganda reasons.
“There is no reliable number on anything.”
i’d say that’s normally good advice. but not really the case here. this is the first major war during the social media, cell phone, internet era, and it’s not that hard to get a general sense of what’s going on, by spending a few hours every day piecing together accounts from a few dozen sources.
UKR forces are mostly reduced to being an army at this point. they still have 1000 armor units in the battle, artillery, and hundreds of thousands of infantry. they have almost no aircraft left (might actually in fact have 0 helicopters now) and not enough jets to do any counterattacking. they effectively have no navy now (not that they had a big one to start). their soviet era AA units, which had been moderately effective, have mostly been destroyed. RUS is now starting in on destroying their oil infrastructure to take their fuel away, and destroying their railroads, so those daily US and NATO resupply missions will be getting harder and more dangerous.
ukraine has no domestic oil production. they have the same issue the Axis had in the 1940s. not much oil, while Russia produces 12 million barrels per day. you can only fight a modern war while the oil supply keeps flowing. they won’t have much gasoline or diesel soon. or jet fuel, not that that matters now. oil pipelines in, or oil deliveries on rail coming in, can also be cut or blown up with missiles, and will be, if RUS decides to.
this war would already be over, if NATO wasn’t dumping their entire inventory into UKR. UKR would have run out of ammunition weeks ago. we’re talking about a REALLY unusual situation here. with various NATO forces dumping several YEARS worth of their own missile and ammunition production into UKR units. an unsustainable situation. “Javelin missiles mean that tanks are obsolete!” maybe, if you can dump literally YEARS of missile production from several countries, into a 2 month battle, and equip every other INFANTRY guy with a $100,000 missile. but you can’t do that normally. that’s a one shot deal. NATO put every javelin, AT-4, LAW, stinger, and other infantry missile they had into UKR. not sure they sent any carl gustav stuff though.
plenty of known, verifiable numbers in this post. known, pre-war numbers for military inventory and oil production, freely available on the internet, and so on. numbers, numbers, numbers, something this thread had very little of, because it’s not a serious thread.
From your comment in the last thread...
Thanks for the book recommendation. I looked up the title "Esotericism and the Academy: Rejected Knowledge in Western Culture" as well as the author Wouter Hanegraaff. He actually looks to be a legit scholar so the book may be a worthwhile read. Have you read it, or just heard the author on the podcast?
I tend to be wary of anything that gets into the occult/ esoteric knowledge, not because I think it's necessarily BS, but because there is so much absolute garbage out there concerning any of it.
The last such book that was recommended to me was the improbably named "Secret History of the World".
https://www.amazon.com/Secret-History-World-Mark-Booth/dp/1590201620
It was exceptionally bad as a coherent narrative and "scholarship" although I suppose it was entertaining enough as a laugh. I didn't finish it, as I couldn't give it that much of my time, in the end.
Wouter Hanegraaff looks potentially interesting though. The title you mentioned is a rather pricey buy at $60+ but I may look it up in one of the college libraries, or see if any of his other books are more moderately priced.
Thanks again for the recommendation!Replies: @AaronB, @songbird, @Emil Nikola Richard
Even if you prefer reading physical books (as I do), I recommend getting an e-reader. If you don’t mind getting one secondhand, you can pick one up for what I consider dirt cheap: $20-25.
It’s not a perfect experience, and has its deficiencies, but, in some ways, it is really great. IMO, it is definitely better than reading on a computer. Easier on the eyes. Easy to travel with, and works in direct sunlight. You can load rare books that are impossible to find and out of copyright from Project Gutenburg. Or, if you are willing to hoist the Jolly Roger, there is libgen.
Are you sure this "i-wiki-reader" demon of which you speak won't steal my soul while I'm reading?
But in all seriousness, the e-reader does sound like it has some very convenient access advantages. On the other hand, I can't even get to all the books I already own so it's not like I'm really starved for reading material.
On technology I like to make somewhat arbitrary lines in the sand which I don't cross since I feel that otherwise it will creep in everywhere, inexorably, like the Blob!
My flip phone is one such line in the sand and I suspect the e-reader will be as well. Thanks to you (and AaronB) for the good suggestions. It would probably be prudent and sensible for me to follow your advice, but I'm not sure it's my style.
Starvation signals in an Ukr POW. His ribs can be counted.
https://twitter.com/AZmilitary1/status/1512504856333979657?cxt=HHwWksC4refJv_0pAAAA
I don´t think this poor Ukronazi will be useful as slave manpower to rebuild Donbass as proposed by Russel “Texas” Bentley. After all, a slave should be able to work.
Bentley – a career small time criminal who moved from USA to Donbas and supports Russia. Another example, like convicted sex offender Ritter or the career swindler Gonzalo of a morally corrupt Westerner supporting Russia.
Honestly, I don't think that there is much logical mirroring going on, in all of this. Many Eastern Europeans are saying, "Send Starstreaks, send Javelins, send fighter jets, killer drones, and tanks. Send everything including the kitchen sink, set up a NFZ, and risk WW3, and you are a villain or a coward, if you don't."
But what have they sent us, in the West? What "bravery" and what "help" have they demonstrated in our existential fight? We've been under attack for years. It is not a military invasion, but, then again, a military invasion would have fallen flat on its ass and been destroyed, in no time. No, the tactics have been adjusted, on an evolutionary level, to sidestep war, and, even to take advantage of it, when it happens in other places.
Not only have they not done or said much. (I've frankly seen practically nothing on the political end - those who still have states aren't using them to help). But many Eastern Europeans are laughing at us, and saying "Good riddance!" and "You deserve it!" And pretending that they are immune to it, when all the signs point to "not so much."
Ukraine seems to be saying "Welcome! Welcome! Use us as a base to assault the West! We are cheap, we can credential your Bantus, so that you can claim they are "doctors" and "Ukrainians." While nobody in the West has volunteered to be a Russian base.
Russian tanks rolling to the Atlantic is frankly an impossible scenario, but Globohomo going the other way seems more than probable. In fact, it already has "boots on the ground", in much of Eastern Europe.Replies: @AP, @Coconuts
Another Kiev regime mayor was featured on a PBS NewsHour segment with Nick Schifrin, who is a vile anti-Russian propagandist. This particular segment included a blurred by PBS wall photo of Bandera in that mayor's office as e referred to Russians as cockroaches. Likewise when no context given whenever the Banderite black and red flag is shown in Western mass media. Kiev regime-controlled Ukraine formally honors Bandera. Neo-Nazi is appropriate.
From your comment in the last thread...
Thanks for the book recommendation. I looked up the title "Esotericism and the Academy: Rejected Knowledge in Western Culture" as well as the author Wouter Hanegraaff. He actually looks to be a legit scholar so the book may be a worthwhile read. Have you read it, or just heard the author on the podcast?
I tend to be wary of anything that gets into the occult/ esoteric knowledge, not because I think it's necessarily BS, but because there is so much absolute garbage out there concerning any of it.
The last such book that was recommended to me was the improbably named "Secret History of the World".
https://www.amazon.com/Secret-History-World-Mark-Booth/dp/1590201620
It was exceptionally bad as a coherent narrative and "scholarship" although I suppose it was entertaining enough as a laugh. I didn't finish it, as I couldn't give it that much of my time, in the end.
Wouter Hanegraaff looks potentially interesting though. The title you mentioned is a rather pricey buy at $60+ but I may look it up in one of the college libraries, or see if any of his other books are more moderately priced.
Thanks again for the recommendation!Replies: @AaronB, @songbird, @Emil Nikola Richard
I used that book because it was the first thing that came to mind to illustrate my point–there are establishment academics doing first class work even though the average contemporary academic seems dreadful.
It isn’t for everybody. I happen to have it at hand so will give a short example. One of my favorite notations is on page 121. A paragraph-long small print quotation, Paul Arnold, quoting Tertulian, quoting Saint Paul.
I don’t even know the word for one step beyond a thrice nested quotation. Call it four-nested.
(My usual translation (RSV) doesn’t put it like that exactly.)
First military commander (Girkin), first PM of Donetsk (Borodai) and one of two deputy PMs were Russian people from Russia, neither Donbas locals nor even people from elsewhere in Ukraine. The warlord “Motorola” was another one. Turning what had been some civil unrest into a civil war lasting for years was a Russian project. There is no analogue in Ukraine’s case.
Russia made it possible in 2014 and has accelerated it in 2022.
Lol. How right he was for all the wrong reasons. The Sieg Heil was alll about razzing Russia.Replies: @AP
American revolutionaries greatly benefited from French support and the help of foreign mercenaries. Much if not most of the American Revolutionary War was fought among the American colonists.
NATOization of Ukraine has been ongoing.
https://www.eurasiareview.com/04042022-handicapping-ukraine-and-russia-west-differences-oped/
https://www.eurasiareview.com/11032022-what-russia-desires-oped/
I don´t know him and your claims (after you claimed that a Russian corvette was sank by a MLRS salvo) are not trustworthy anymore. Anyway, the point here is another one: POWs like this one will not be usable as slaves. Donbass authorities will need to feed them in order to restore their adequate physical fit if they want to use them as slave manpower.
Are you pro-Russia at this point also?Replies: @Aedib
Russia made it possible in 2014 and has accelerated it in 2022.Replies: @Wokechoke, @Mikhail
“English” soccer player talks about Ukraine and Poland in 2012
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-18192375
“Stay away you could come back in a Coffin”…
Lol. How right he was for all the wrong reasons. The Sieg Heil was alll about razzing Russia.
indeed, trying to mostly avoid this exact thing could explain why RUS units didn't just blow up all the railroads in the first couple weeks. they were deliberately not doing that, to allow ukranians all the around the country to leave the area on trains.
so i'd say totally possible a train got blown up, but that's a normal part of a big war. extremely low chance it was on purpose, very high chance it was just collateral damage. RUS is moving now to limit UKR ability to move units around the country, and US and NATO allies will continue to deliberately force the conflict to get worse by sending equipment into ukraine on railroads. so more of this stuff is likely. next they'll be sneaking in equipment on trucks or disguised as aid shipments traveling on roads.Replies: @Wokechoke, @LondonBob
They have been hit rail transit points at night, Kramatorsk isn’t a transit point and it was widely known it was packed with civilians leaving.
https://twitter.com/morphonios/status/1512432902021210114?s=20&t=B_eXUFb3CQfDQc1MH9UwVg
That mistake was a lot less ridiculous than the several statements by Ritter.
Are you pro-Russia at this point also?
Are you pro-Russia at this point also?Replies: @Aedib
You are trying the good old character assassination. Anyway, “il messaggero non e importante”. The message is.
Thanks for your well stated post. I’m in full agreement and am also hoping that GR will be back after he cools down.
It’s also a very good point on the humanities. They are becoming a sadly distorted and truncated field, but they should have their proper place as the pursuits which make us intellectually and socially rich and which gives depth to our lives.
It’s a stupid society which can’t find a useful place for a man like GR to exercise his gifts, but elevates idiotic pop stars.
Lol. How right he was for all the wrong reasons. The Sieg Heil was alll about razzing Russia.Replies: @AP
Anti-Eastern European bigotry. Ironically those games (in Poland and Ukraine) had much less violence than ones in Western Europe that featured Russian hooligans running amuck assaulting people.
I asked a question about whether you are pro-Russia at this point but it’s good that you accept that being so is associated with bad character.
But let’s go to the root message: starved POWs are not fit for slave manpower and this POW seems starved. I just say that I don’t know the current situation (in terms of levels of ammo, fuel and food) of all Ukrainian soldiers in the Western Donbass cauldron. Anyway I bet not all Ukrainian soldiers are in such a deplorable condtion. The “%” is a big unknown.Replies: @Beckow, @AP
Russia’s actions have prompted anyone with at least a basic level of decency* (even Biden, and even Germany though barely) to change course and provide aid to Ukraine but the idea that he has been working on Ukraine’s behalf is silly.
* and opportunism, Russia’s colossal blunder in invading is a golden opportunity to wear down its military and bring its economy downReplies: @A123
Not-The-President Biden is a puppet for WEF Elites. Anyone who believes that there is influence coming from this guy is not paying attention. At best he is a tool. And, not a particularly useful one.
WEF Elites also managed the more difficult task of manipulating Zelensky. They encouraged the Ukrainian government to be provocative and inflammatory. At thevsame time, they “leaked” information to Beijing about their intent to expand the Globallist footprint in Ukraine. This information was relayed to Moscow. They pushed both sides, and managed to start a war that benefits neither Russia nor Ukraine.
The Primary goal of the exercise, from their point of view, is Open Borders. Large populations are on the move and MENA illegals are routing through Ukraine to enter the EU. Secondary goals include enriching the MIC and weakening V4 cohesiveness. The Multiculturalist EU leadership wants to keep this conflict going as long as possible. Look for them to provide enough munitions for Ukraine to *fight*, but insufficient support to *win*.
The smartest possible move for Russia and Ukraine is to end the LOSE-LOSE conflict with some sort of armistice:
— Why is the Fake Stream Media exaggerating “war crimes” by both sides?
— Are they Poisoning The Well to make an deal impossible?
PEACE 😇
That’s why I pretty much restrict my online commenting to this thread. Too much time investment for anything more. I even find the amount that I comment to be a stretch and don’t know how the more prolific pull it off.
Perhaps the entire internet is a massive psy-ops to keep us all occupied and out of trouble, heh! I’m sure it’s much easier to manage populations who have a convenient release valve and get to feel that they are doing something of consequence in the world by posting. This doesn’t apply to us so much, since I think we’re all pretty comfortable with the fact that our posts affect ziltch outside of the participants in the thread, but it certainly applies to the larger social media world.
You are constantly changing the discussion axis. I repeat you: “il messaggero non e importante”. By suggesting that Ritter is a pedo, that Bentley is a criminal and that Lira is a swindler you are trying “character assassination” on them just because they say things that doesn’t fit your narrative. I don’t personally know their curriculums, although Ritter seems to have a very god one (that’s from the net). You just can say that they are wrong but you insistence in defamation seems quite weird.
But let’s go to the root message: starved POWs are not fit for slave manpower and this POW seems starved. I just say that I don’t know the current situation (in terms of levels of ammo, fuel and food) of all Ukrainian soldiers in the Western Donbass cauldron. Anyway I bet not all Ukrainian soldiers are in such a deplorable condtion. The “%” is a big unknown.
I wonder what could stop it at this point, but I suspect words won't do it. All the ad hominem attacks by AP and others are not accomplishing anything.Replies: @Aedib
The fact that you went where you did.... That says a great deal about you.
PEACE 😇Replies: @silviosilver, @WizardWhoKnocks
Yes, it says I take race seriously. I haven’t exactly been hiding that.
That you’d turn tail and run from your “gaff” so quickly also says something about you, cuck boy.
They are fascinating creatures. Not the least reason being that they are not susceptible to rabies. As I see it, the single American (as in US) marsupial is a validation of the idea that we should be trying to bring back the great, extinct megafauna of Australia, as well as smaller beasts, such as the Tasmanian tiger.Replies: @silviosilver
#LetsGoBrandon 😇
_____________________
(1) https://dailycaller.com/2022/04/09/bill-maher-war-on-jokes-must-end-video-chris-rock-will-smith/Replies: @silviosilver
Much more about the BBC taking some other narrative forward that they don’t want to follow for the moment. You really think those antitank missiles are going to come free? The Poles and Ukies will be niggarded to death as a result of taking the consignments. Sol Campbell was a big dumb Dindu.
Ukraine would not benefit from being judged by the same standard.
Honestly, I don’t think that there is much logical mirroring going on, in all of this. Many Eastern Europeans are saying, “Send Starstreaks, send Javelins, send fighter jets, killer drones, and tanks. Send everything including the kitchen sink, set up a NFZ, and risk WW3, and you are a villain or a coward, if you don’t.”
But what have they sent us, in the West? What “bravery” and what “help” have they demonstrated in our existential fight? We’ve been under attack for years. It is not a military invasion, but, then again, a military invasion would have fallen flat on its ass and been destroyed, in no time. No, the tactics have been adjusted, on an evolutionary level, to sidestep war, and, even to take advantage of it, when it happens in other places.
Not only have they not done or said much. (I’ve frankly seen practically nothing on the political end – those who still have states aren’t using them to help). But many Eastern Europeans are laughing at us, and saying “Good riddance!” and “You deserve it!” And pretending that they are immune to it, when all the signs point to “not so much.”
Ukraine seems to be saying “Welcome! Welcome! Use us as a base to assault the West! We are cheap, we can credential your Bantus, so that you can claim they are “doctors” and “Ukrainians.” While nobody in the West has volunteered to be a Russian base.
Russian tanks rolling to the Atlantic is frankly an impossible scenario, but Globohomo going the other way seems more than probable. In fact, it already has “boots on the ground”, in much of Eastern Europe.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/25/Islam_in_Europe-2010.svg/1024px-Islam_in_Europe-2010.svg.png
Eastern Europe is the last reservoir of pure Europeans, with a largely traditional culture. It ought to be protected. Putin has sent Asian Buryats and Muslim Chechens to brutalize a piece of it.Replies: @songbird, @Wokechoke, @A123, @Dmitry
Like in Ukraine, it seems fairly clear that this is a war between two competing nations and national ideas, and something like the following view of national identity still seems quite pervasive in the region (even if it is held implicitly): Imo Ukrainians (and Russians) are too involved in the immediate struggle and don't have the depth of knowledge of Western/Anglo culture to know how to present this angle, and a lot of the big Western institutional supporters of Ukraine don't want it presented either; their spin on the conflict is more that it is Ukraine's attempt to break with any ethnic and historical influences and adopt the globalist version of liberal democracy they promote.
The Russians are just as capable of using civilians as human shields as are the Ukrainians.
Have you ever considered that the Russians don't want the Donbas civilians to leave in mass for several reasons? They're there presumably to help protect the denizens there from being overtaken by the "Nazis". How might it look if they continue to hold on to these areas but yet the majority of its inhabitants have left, mostly to Western Ukraine and further West? It seems that the only story that Kremlinoids have let is to blame every single massacre on the Ukrainian side. If the photos aren't enough proof of what's been going on, you only have to listen to the eye witness accounts of those involved to really find out what happened.Replies: @Wokechoke, @Here Be Dragon, @Mikhail
The Russians do want the civilians to leave, in mass. That would make it much easier for them to capture the town, and free the region of Ukrainian forces. Kramatorsk belongs to the Donetsk Republic.
And Tochka-U is a Ukrainian missile. This is not the first time Ukrainians hit a civilian area with it. Just a couple of weeks ago one of these landed in the center of Donetsk.
Russian Tochka-U ballistic missiles return to service amid Ukraine war
The Russian military forces’ Tochka-U ( NATO reporting name is SS-21 Scarab-B) tactical ballistic missiles are operational again, according to open-source-intelligence analysts who scrutinize photos and videos on social media.
Belarus-based analyst released Wednesday video footage reportedly showing a column of Russian military vehicles with “V” marks, which was moving from Rechitsa towards Gomel along the M10 highway.
“There were at least 8 Tochka-U, several BTR-82a, about 9 KamAZ trucks, some of which are carrying Tochka-U missiles, communication vehicle and a crane,” the MotolkoHelp said in a Twitter post.
The Tochka-U short-range ballistic missile system was officially withdrawn from Russian Army service in 2019 (actually in 2021), but apparently, military necessity forced it to be returned to service again.Replies: @Here Be Dragon
That you'd turn tail and run from your "gaff" so quickly also says something about you, cuck boy.Replies: @Yahya, @songbird, @A123
I see Gugna Din hasn’t meaningfully altered your worldview.
Anyway, that is the message I choose to take from Kim.Replies: @Barbarossa, @Yevardian
But let’s go to the root message: starved POWs are not fit for slave manpower and this POW seems starved. I just say that I don’t know the current situation (in terms of levels of ammo, fuel and food) of all Ukrainian soldiers in the Western Donbass cauldron. Anyway I bet not all Ukrainian soldiers are in such a deplorable condtion. The “%” is a big unknown.Replies: @Beckow, @AP
In a war all is fair, people don’t want to know the truth, they want to win. The war started out relatively small, very tentative and symbolic. It is no longer small, spring and summer are good seasons for fighting.
I wonder what could stop it at this point, but I suspect words won’t do it. All the ad hominem attacks by AP and others are not accomplishing anything.
O’d say the war has been going since 1648.
But let’s go to the root message: starved POWs are not fit for slave manpower and this POW seems starved. I just say that I don’t know the current situation (in terms of levels of ammo, fuel and food) of all Ukrainian soldiers in the Western Donbass cauldron. Anyway I bet not all Ukrainian soldiers are in such a deplorable condtion. The “%” is a big unknown.Replies: @Beckow, @AP
I am not suggesting: Ritter has been convicted twice of sexual offences involving underage girls and Bentley is a convicted drug dealer from Minneapolis (I wonder if he knew George Floyd?). Something is really wrong with these people. It is a pattern which is remarkable and interesting which is why I commented on it.
Ritter’s comments about Ukraine that I posted tell us that he is useless on that topic.
With respect to Lira and Ritter, you are going on with ad hominem attacks because what they said obfuscate you.Replies: @AP
And Tochka-U is a Ukrainian missile. This is not the first time Ukrainians hit a civilian area with it. Just a couple of weeks ago one of these landed in the center of Donetsk.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DYmFHbT5HTcReplies: @AP
https://defence-blog.com/russian-tochka-u-ballistic-missiles-return-to-service-amid-ukraine-war/
Russian Tochka-U ballistic missiles return to service amid Ukraine war
The Russian military forces’ Tochka-U ( NATO reporting name is SS-21 Scarab-B) tactical ballistic missiles are operational again, according to open-source-intelligence analysts who scrutinize photos and videos on social media.
Belarus-based analyst released Wednesday video footage reportedly showing a column of Russian military vehicles with “V” marks, which was moving from Rechitsa towards Gomel along the M10 highway.
“There were at least 8 Tochka-U, several BTR-82a, about 9 KamAZ trucks, some of which are carrying Tochka-U missiles, communication vehicle and a crane,” the MotolkoHelp said in a Twitter post.
The Tochka-U short-range ballistic missile system was officially withdrawn from Russian Army service in 2019 (actually in 2021), but apparently, military necessity forced it to be returned to service again.
there's no talk about that on this thread, because this isn't a serious war thread."One keeps hearing about bad Russian losses, much of which seems fairly credible but not much about the proportionality."
no, that's just western media bias, who are totally, 100% in the tank on this thing for Washington DC and the US State Department. in their world, democrats never lie, cheat, or steal. and UKR units are never destroyed, and have unlimited fuel and ammunition,for weeks on here there wasn't even any talk about the actual numbers involved. but the actual numbers are, UKR had about 600,000 defenders, and russian leadership decided that about 200,000 attackers was sufficient to engage them and accomplish their objectives. whether they were correct, we'll see.normally this would be a huge advantage for the defenders. but that's mostly not what's happening here. UKR units are getting pulverized. if this wasn't the case, we'd still be seeing those videos of RUS units being destroyed. but that slowed down to a trickle after the first 2 weeks. the reverse is the case - the zelensky government has now made it illegal for ukrainians to record and post internet videos of UKR units getting destroyed. which is mostly what's happening. note i'm not saying there aren't lots of videos of UKR units being destroyed every day. there are. just that it's illegal for ukrainian citizens to post these, for propaganda reasons.Replies: @Philip Owen
Ukraine did not have 600,000 called up defenders. That was the size of the reserve whcih is still far from completely called up due to lack of equipment. Ukraine had about 120,000 regulars with 60,000 in the Donbas, Territorial Defence Units were up and running. Russian attacked Kiev with 70,000 troops of whom 35,000 got back as effective. Losses were due to death, injury, surrender, desertion and poor hygeine/equipment (frostbite, trenchfoot, typhus). Hygeine being the biggest single problem. The 40 mile ocnvoy was stopped by 30 men on quad bikes acting opportunistically, a lucky (NATO strategy preparedness) break for Ukraine. By the time Russia tried other supply routes Ukraine forces were ready.
i'd say that's normally good advice. but not really the case here. this is the first major war during the social media, cell phone, internet era, and it's not that hard to get a general sense of what's going on, by spending a few hours every day piecing together accounts from a few dozen sources.UKR forces are mostly reduced to being an army at this point. they still have 1000 armor units in the battle, artillery, and hundreds of thousands of infantry. they have almost no aircraft left (might actually in fact have 0 helicopters now) and not enough jets to do any counterattacking. they effectively have no navy now (not that they had a big one to start). their soviet era AA units, which had been moderately effective, have mostly been destroyed. RUS is now starting in on destroying their oil infrastructure to take their fuel away, and destroying their railroads, so those daily US and NATO resupply missions will be getting harder and more dangerous.ukraine has no domestic oil production. they have the same issue the Axis had in the 1940s. not much oil, while Russia produces 12 million barrels per day. you can only fight a modern war while the oil supply keeps flowing. they won't have much gasoline or diesel soon. or jet fuel, not that that matters now. oil pipelines in, or oil deliveries on rail coming in, can also be cut or blown up with missiles, and will be, if RUS decides to.this war would already be over, if NATO wasn't dumping their entire inventory into UKR. UKR would have run out of ammunition weeks ago. we're talking about a REALLY unusual situation here. with various NATO forces dumping several YEARS worth of their own missile and ammunition production into UKR units. an unsustainable situation. "Javelin missiles mean that tanks are obsolete!" maybe, if you can dump literally YEARS of missile production from several countries, into a 2 month battle, and equip every other INFANTRY guy with a $100,000 missile. but you can't do that normally. that's a one shot deal. NATO put every javelin, AT-4, LAW, stinger, and other infantry missile they had into UKR. not sure they sent any carl gustav stuff though.plenty of known, verifiable numbers in this post. known, pre-war numbers for military inventory and oil production, freely available on the internet, and so on. numbers, numbers, numbers, something this thread had very little of, because it's not a serious thread.Replies: @Philip Owen
Ukraine farms have full supplies for diesel ready for spring sowing. Every farm is a supply point.
I thought Rudyard Kipling was a racialist.
Anyway, that is the message I choose to take from Kim.
I would say that he probably held the British to be a pinnacle of humanity, but this didn't prohibit him from seeing and admiring those worthy others.Replies: @songbird, @RSDB
Was Romney voting for Ketanji Brown symptomatic of the way that Mormonism has transformed itself in the wake of the “civil rights” movement? Or is it just that he comes from a political family, and is some special breed of sell-out?
You are still going on with ad hominem attacks. What Bentley said is that captured ukronazis should be used as slave manpower to rebuild Donetsk and it seems many people from Donetsk agree with him. This is the message.
With respect to Lira and Ritter, you are going on with ad hominem attacks because what they said obfuscate you.
Anyway, that is the message I choose to take from Kim.Replies: @Barbarossa, @Yevardian
Well, I think Kipling was a racialist in the grand old British Imperial tradition, but he was also more than capable of a top of the hat to a “worthy darkie”.
I would say that he probably held the British to be a pinnacle of humanity, but this didn’t prohibit him from seeing and admiring those worthy others.
Indians generally come off quite well in Kim; as I recall, the most buffoonish characters are a Frenchman and a Russian.
Kipling is also responsible for clothing Afghans, or at least Pathans (as he would call them), in a halo of romance they might not otherwise have possessed. I don't think this had any great effect on the subsequent history of that part of the world, but who knows? Chesterton says:
I wonder what could stop it at this point, but I suspect words won't do it. All the ad hominem attacks by AP and others are not accomplishing anything.Replies: @Aedib
It can go way bigger. What surprise me is that Tu-22M3 have not seen action. The Russians can smultaneously send a couple of dozen of them with around 15-20 tons of thermobaric bombs per bomber to annihilate those “Maginot lines” in Western Donbass. Why they didn´t do it? I don’t know.
It is hard to tell, but it is shaping up as a total disaster for Ukraine. The others involved, Russia, EU, will get hurt but will get over it with time. Kiev is behaving as if they didn't have any long term plans, as if it was all about now, about emotional drama - in effect they are being nihilists. An interesting art genre, but not a good way to run a modern country. This one is not just for the history books, this will be studied by psychiatrists.
That you'd turn tail and run from your "gaff" so quickly also says something about you, cuck boy.Replies: @Yahya, @songbird, @A123
Once, when I was a boy, I opened my front door at night to find a monstrous hissing possum on the stoop.
They are fascinating creatures. Not the least reason being that they are not susceptible to rabies. As I see it, the single American (as in US) marsupial is a validation of the idea that we should be trying to bring back the great, extinct megafauna of Australia, as well as smaller beasts, such as the Tasmanian tiger.
Regarding extinction and the Tasmanian tiger, it hit me a bit hard when, back in 3rd grade, I learned that that animal had gone extinct. Unlike the dinosaurs, whose extinction had occurred eons ago (but knowledge of which also left me wistful), this poor creature had met that sad fate in our own day, which somehow made it seem "more real" (perhaps more threatening) to me.
I probably didn't use these words to myself back then, but the thought, in one form or another, that "nature can be cruel" did occur to me. And nowadays I'd add that nature may be beautiful pines and glistening lakes, but it's also blood and guts, muck and ooze, broken limbs, horrific disease, paralyzing fear, pain and more pain, all before the awesome finality of death. Not altogether a pretty picture, if you ask me.
"Nature, to be commanded, must be obeyed," said Francis Bacon (AaaronB recoiling!). Nature must thus continue to be investigated, using the most precise tools of investigation at our disposal; we must never allow it to be sacralized by obscurantists and anti-humanists. To take a page from Thulean Fiend's book, we must either bend that bitch to our will or heroically perish in the attempt. There is no other way.Replies: @songbird, @AaronB, @sher singh
I would say that he probably held the British to be a pinnacle of humanity, but this didn't prohibit him from seeing and admiring those worthy others.Replies: @songbird, @RSDB
Believe he mentioned Gaelic-speaking blacks in Nova Scotia in Captains Courageous – a subject that I would have rather he skipped over.
I didn't have any issue with the black Gaelic speakers. It's not like he made it up as some piece of woke revisionism.
Seeing as a great many Irish were sold into slavery to work in the New World (being sold for far cheaper prices than Africans I might add) there is actually a fair bit of crossover here between blacks and Irish. This sometimes led to oddities like Kipling's black Gaelic speaking cook.Replies: @songbird
Anyway, that is the message I choose to take from Kim.Replies: @Barbarossa, @Yevardian
Well, it’s a vague word. Kiplings views were much more nuanced than the caricature than the rather throwaway work of his ‘White Man’s Burden’ eventually painted him into. One of his most recently relevant quotes: ‘making mock of the uniforms that guard you whilst you sleep’.
Traditional Commonsense Racialism =/= autistic HBDist pathological obsession with ‘haplogroups’ and worship of IQ tests.
I don’t think one even has to be conservative, or have ill-will towards foreigners, to see correlation with crime and black population, or the importation of millions of Muslims to Europe was a terrible idea.
Lol, does the very idea of that offend you or what? Although I suppose imagining them wroughting the level of violence to Gaelic as they have done to English is curious. I wonder how Haitian sounds to French-speaker, I suppose its drifted quite a bit further than Jamaican Patois has.
Perhaps the entire internet is a massive psy-ops to keep us all occupied and out of trouble, heh! I'm sure it's much easier to manage populations who have a convenient release valve and get to feel that they are doing something of consequence in the world by posting. This doesn't apply to us so much, since I think we're all pretty comfortable with the fact that our posts affect ziltch outside of the participants in the thread, but it certainly applies to the larger social media world.Replies: @Yevardian
Go to any of Steve Sailers threads and see the minds at work there and you’ll stop definitely see no reason to complain about the comment quality at this site-appendix.
Russian Tochka-U ballistic missiles return to service amid Ukraine war
The Russian military forces’ Tochka-U ( NATO reporting name is SS-21 Scarab-B) tactical ballistic missiles are operational again, according to open-source-intelligence analysts who scrutinize photos and videos on social media.
Belarus-based analyst released Wednesday video footage reportedly showing a column of Russian military vehicles with “V” marks, which was moving from Rechitsa towards Gomel along the M10 highway.
“There were at least 8 Tochka-U, several BTR-82a, about 9 KamAZ trucks, some of which are carrying Tochka-U missiles, communication vehicle and a crane,” the MotolkoHelp said in a Twitter post.
The Tochka-U short-range ballistic missile system was officially withdrawn from Russian Army service in 2019 (actually in 2021), but apparently, military necessity forced it to be returned to service again.Replies: @Here Be Dragon
Excellent source. An American blogger, making claims based on a blurred photograph, sent to him – no doubt – from Belarus. On March 31, 2022. Just in time!
And here is an official statement from November 22, 2019.
https://eng.mil.ru/en/news_page/country/more.htm?id=12263177@egNews
Tochka-U missiles not in service in Russian Armed Forces — mission to UN
https://tass.com/politics/1423317
https://twitter.com/RichardHanania/status/1512939725513912323
Given the fact that the casing supposedly had "For the Children" written in Russian, that strongly suggests it may have been a deliberate false-flag.
https://www.moonofalabama.org/12i/ukrmissile2.jpg
We'll see whether our MSM picks up on any of this.Replies: @S, @utu, @Here Be Dragon, @Peripatetic Commenter
I wasn’t complaining about the quality at all. If I thought it wasn’t high quality I wouldn’t bother. The combination of Ron’s commenting platform par excellence along with such an eclectic group of intelligent individuals makes for a great experience.
Partly, I’m trying to make a joke against the way the woke have presented him.
But partly I am serious.
Am sure you haven’t read any of the books by the Blasket Islanders, but, in one of them, a man relates, that when he was a boy in the 1800s, a group of sailors came to the island, (now abandoned and conceptually once seen as one of the last tiny holdouts of traditional culture) which included a black, who didn’t speak the language, but he was just like any other man.
Even though these are old, I recognize them for what they are: instances of color-signaling. As I see it, a deep moral failing and special susceptibility among Europeans, with runaway potential for endless evils. It is very disturbing to see that people were susceptible to it back then. But more than that, these sort of things are small footholds for deconstruction. Props for people to pretend that Canada or Ireland were always multicult. And, frankly, I think they somewhat ruin the experience of escapism, by highlighting a proto-globalism.
But I don’t think that of every instance. I quite liked the old book Mr. Hack recommended A Vagabond Journey Around the World, though it mentioned blacks in a French port, because I felt it had healthy skepticism of radical universalism, and an appreciation for the differences among people and places.
Not practical. But for one plus, it would have the defensive value in the medieval times.
You can try to navigate in a traditional city, imagine the confusion for invading soldiers https://www.google.com/maps/@37.389448,-5.9900259,3a,75y,24.04h,85.07t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sOuDF1nrDRA6xx3M-nl7eMQ!2e0!7i16384!8i8192
They moved most of the aspects of the traditional Japanese life into the square office buildings, at least at nightime. It has something like the villages of the Miyazaki anime “Spirited Away”.
I didn’t understand your dislike of Haussmann’s Paris. It’s an example where the rebuilding of the city, didn’t result exactly in elimination of a traditional active street life.
Because the Russian government claims are a reliable source.
Because Ukraine has no other missiles, and has a reason to perpetrate a false flag attack and blame it on Russia. Ukraine has a reason to not let people flee the town, and Russia has no reason to attack a train station.
Russia might need to hit the railroad, but not the street in front of it, full of people. Even if Russia indeed tried to hit the railroad, but missed it, the choice of a cluster munition is inappropriate for the task.
And Russia has better missiles to use for it.Replies: @sher singh, @AP
I actually just re-read Captains Courageous a few months ago and enjoyed it thoroughly. Picked it off the kid’s shelf for a quick read as I’m sometimes prone to do.
I didn’t have any issue with the black Gaelic speakers. It’s not like he made it up as some piece of woke revisionism.
Seeing as a great many Irish were sold into slavery to work in the New World (being sold for far cheaper prices than Africans I might add) there is actually a fair bit of crossover here between blacks and Irish. This sometimes led to oddities like Kipling’s black Gaelic speaking cook.
I am actually kind of surprised that it isn't also Aaron B's favorite (as I recall he likes Kim, though I am not sure if he has read CC), but I suppose part of the pleasure of experiencing anything is having your own tastes.Replies: @AaronB
There’s a little bit of most anything for most anybody that can be found within that book. Among other things, I enjoyed finding out how vagabonds of that time could find financial and life support assistance from various organizations like the Red Cross and governmental handouts from local ambassadorial offices and embassies etc. I remember one scene where several fellow travelers were enjoying some sunshine on the lawn in front of one of these places, sharing tobacco to be smoked within pipes, exchanging information that only these world travelers probably knew about. Even travel tickets to the next port of call…..the trip through Southeast Asia was quite colorful, as I remember. 🙂
Wiki: In Wandering in Northern China (1923), he visited Korea, which had been a Japanese colony since 1910. The first thing he noted was that Korea was virtually devoid of trees.[2] The aristocracy had been stripped of their duties but were allowed to wear the unique attire of their rank, although many were living in poverty. Franck reported that the women "displayed to the public gaze exactly that portion of the torso which the women of most nations take pains to conceal."
List of his works:
A Vagabond Journey Around the World (1910)[7]
Four Months Afoot in Spain (1911)
Zone Policeman 88 (1913)
Bussy Destroyer 2000 Machine Shop (1969)
Tramping Through Mexico, Guatemala, and Honduras (1916)
Vagabonding Down the Andes (1917)
Vagabonding Through Changing Germany (1920)
Roaming Through the West Indies (1920)
Working North from Patagonia (1921)
Wandering in Northern China (1923)
Glimpses of Japan and Formosa (1924)
Roving Through Southern China (1925)
All About Going Abroad (1927)
The Japanese Empire (1927)
East of Siam (1926)
The Fringe of the Moslem World (1928)
I Discover Greece (1929)
A Scandinavian Summer (1930)
Foot-Loose in the British Isles (1932)
Trailing Cortez Through Mexico (1935)
A Vagabond in Sovietland (1935)
Roaming in Hawaii (1937)
Sky Roaming Above Two Continents (1938)
The Lure of Alaska (1939)
The Pan American Highway; From the Rio Grande to the Canal Zone (1940)[8]
Rediscovering South America (1943)
Winter Journey Through the Ninth
The last book is his war "memoirs" from WWII in France (published posthumously) -- as a 61 year-old he obtained a commission in the Ninth Army Air Force.Replies: @songbird
This reminds me that there was an ancient coin from Crete which had the Minotaur’s maze on it.
To me, it is such a brilliant design because it is evocative of so many things. The difficulties to be solved in business and in navigating the right price. “Buyer beware!” And the moral quandaries that money and materialism can create. The potential for runaway greed, or losing sight of what is important.
There were at least a hundred and one great designs like that rooted in history and with moral resonance that the Euro currency could have borrowed. Instead, they chose very sterile designs, intentionally without any people on them. Designs that, I would argue, were evil, and which often replaced better designs, even without needing to delve deeply into the past.
I think this picture may show the maze coin that you were thinking of. At their high point, ancient Greek coinage is really perhaps unsurpassed in it's elegance and design. The relief is quite high as well which is notable too, giving their coinage a real depth and sculptural quality.
I was an avid coin collector as a kid, and had a fair number of Roman bronze coins since they are fairly inexpensive. Unfortunately, Greek coinage was far outside my pay grade. There is some Roman coinage in the higher denominations which comes pretty close to the Greek in technical ability, but overall the Roman coinage is far cruder and less artistically interesting. It is all political signalling, where the Greeks had an incredible variety of themes.
I completely agree on modern coinage. It's completely graceless and ugly. An eyesore like the rest of the modern project.Replies: @songbird, @S
Yes, in fact I was reading that traditional Tokyo was designed as a system of confusing and meandering streets rather than a grid precisely to confound invaders, and that the house numbering and street name system was made deliberately non-logical, so that visiting foreigners had a hard time finding addresses and cabbies had to have specialized local knowledge.
I for one am perfectly willing to trade practicality for aesthetic charm, and I think such an impractical street system would create endless opportunities for fascinating walks and interesting discoveries and also force me to learn my local neighborhood in depth.
I don’t hate Paris and do acknowledge that it has some charm. However, it seemed like altogether too modern and orderly a city to me, and to not reflect the pre-modern Old European mentality that as an American I had come to seek out.
Americans who come from an urban landscape that reflects the ideals of modern rationality and efficiency at the expense of aesthetic charm or spiritual values, crave contact with the pre-modern mentality when they visit Europe.
I found London to be by far the more fascinating and beautiful city, and I couldn’t understand why Paris was celebrated since the 19th century as the Great Beauty of Europe.
But I think the clue lies in the City of Lights moniker – it is precisely the modern character of Paris that so impressed the 19th century, the open and wide grands boulevards that replaced the winding and dark medieval streets, and the bright street lights that Paris excelled in that banished any lingering medieval mystery.
That was what the modernizing 19th century wanted – modernity, bright lights, wide open streets, not medieval mystery and traditional charm.
And yet the most important and interesting experiences of life lie in the shadows, and a City of Lights may be superficial and dull…
The Japanese writer Tanizaki iirc wrote an extraordinary treatise on traditional Japanese aesthetics called “In Praise of Shadows” that is well worth reading as it describes a sensibility utterly foreign to modernity, as Tanizaki was very aware of.
The Japanese also love rainy days, mist shrouded mountains, and sadness, things also under the ban of the bright shining lights of rational modernity…
In the 19th century, wide boulevards would reduce density of traffic, and create more space for pedestrians. Flânerie is a fashion of the late 19th century, at the same time as introduction of wide boulevards. Paris probably became more pedestrian accessible. The streets become public square of the bourgeoisie. It is converting streets, into the public function of the Mediterranean "Plaza/Piazza ". Baudelaire write about standing in mud in the boulevard. But generally you can walk in the center with your expensive cloths, bourgeois shoes are not ruined, neither bourgeois women's dress tails. It was viewed like an increase in the civic spaces. This is like in Renaissance Italian cities, the public sphere and civic political life was created by the Piazzas. Hausmann's Paris creates these vast Piazzas in the city. https://i.imgur.com/Zgn7bi1.jpg By middle 20th century, these spaces are closed and crossing the road becomes hazardous. But in the night there is some atmospherical compensation from shining lights of the large glass shop windows. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=icJw9HXXoXAReplies: @AaronB
I didn't have any issue with the black Gaelic speakers. It's not like he made it up as some piece of woke revisionism.
Seeing as a great many Irish were sold into slavery to work in the New World (being sold for far cheaper prices than Africans I might add) there is actually a fair bit of crossover here between blacks and Irish. This sometimes led to oddities like Kipling's black Gaelic speaking cook.Replies: @songbird
My favorite work of Kipling.
I am actually kind of surprised that it isn’t also Aaron B’s favorite (as I recall he likes Kim, though I am not sure if he has read CC), but I suppose part of the pleasure of experiencing anything is having your own tastes.
Kim is not just my favorite Kipling book, but one of my favorite novels of all time. I think I may have to reread it.
But then I find India infinitely colorful and fascinating.
Btw, songbird, Kipling said the only two places he ever wanted to live his life out in were Vermont and Bombay - and he wasn't able to settle down live in either. He lived for a while in Vermont and fell in love with the place.
Kipling certainly believed in the white man's burden and the superiority of Western civilization, but was deeply in love with the fascination of India and loved it's culture and people - he would have happily lived out his days in Bombay. So he wasn't quite the racist you think :)
I sometimes envy people who got to experience 19th century India - all the color and paegentry, with a much smaller population, and none of the ugliness that came later when the population exploded and modern industry and products began fouling up the place.
When I first started travelling to Asia my own attitude was similar to Kipling's - I had a very innocent and unquestioned sense of my own superiority as a Westerner, and completely looked down on the "natives", while all the while finding their cultures and lifestyles deeply fascinating.
Mt attitude was, in retrospect, amusingly "colonial" in an uncomplicated and innocent way that would be impossible today. But something about the region kept drawing me back.
It was only after many years of returning to Asia again and again - India, SEA, Japan, etc - and spending extended periods of time there that gradually the disquieting feeling arose that in many ways they may actually know how to live much, much better than us, and may in important ways be superior to our "rational" civilization.
I was later to discover that in this I was not in the least unusual - the diaries and letters of colonial administrators and various travelers are full of descriptions of how Asia led them to gradually question industrial civilization and the modern West, despite starting out with an uncomplicated conviction of Western superiority.
I’m such a stick in the mud about these things.
Are you sure this “i-wiki-reader” demon of which you speak won’t steal my soul while I’m reading?
But in all seriousness, the e-reader does sound like it has some very convenient access advantages. On the other hand, I can’t even get to all the books I already own so it’s not like I’m really starved for reading material.
On technology I like to make somewhat arbitrary lines in the sand which I don’t cross since I feel that otherwise it will creep in everywhere, inexorably, like the Blob!
My flip phone is one such line in the sand and I suspect the e-reader will be as well. Thanks to you (and AaronB) for the good suggestions. It would probably be prudent and sensible for me to follow your advice, but I’m not sure it’s my style.
I would say that he probably held the British to be a pinnacle of humanity, but this didn't prohibit him from seeing and admiring those worthy others.Replies: @songbird, @RSDB
Kipling was very inconsistent in the way he thought of the British; while he probably generally thought of them this way he was also quite ready to call them flannelled fools at the wicket, or muddied oafs at the goals if it served the particular message he was trying to convey at the moment.
Indians generally come off quite well in Kim; as I recall, the most buffoonish characters are a Frenchman and a Russian.
Kipling is also responsible for clothing Afghans, or at least Pathans (as he would call them), in a halo of romance they might not otherwise have possessed. I don’t think this had any great effect on the subsequent history of that part of the world, but who knows?
Chesterton says:
I can offer up some 😁 Open Thread Humor😂
Open [MORE] to see bad helicopter planning ... Bad, bad, planning,......
PEACE 😇
https://resources.arcamax.com/newspics/224/22421/2242143.gif
https://i0.wp.com/thefunnyconservative.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/img_2593.jpg
https://cdn.acidcow.com/uploads/posts/2022-02/1646050250_8.gif
https://cdn.acidcow.com/uploads/posts/2022-03/1646652088_1.gif
https://i0.wp.com/thefunnyconservative.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/2A-Just-a-field-trip-back-from-Chicago.jpg?w=640&ssl=1
https://i.imgur.com/XipCopB.jpg
https://cdn.acidcow.com/pics/20220315/1647334044_xuglg4z088.jpg
https://cdn.acidcow.com/uploads/posts/2022-03/1646375696_4.gifReplies: @silviosilver, @Barbarossa
My wife liked your open thread humor. You may be giving her ideas for our home school curriculum with the second one. Hmmmm.
To me, it is such a brilliant design because it is evocative of so many things. The difficulties to be solved in business and in navigating the right price. "Buyer beware!" And the moral quandaries that money and materialism can create. The potential for runaway greed, or losing sight of what is important.
There were at least a hundred and one great designs like that rooted in history and with moral resonance that the Euro currency could have borrowed. Instead, they chose very sterile designs, intentionally without any people on them. Designs that, I would argue, were evil, and which often replaced better designs, even without needing to delve deeply into the past.Replies: @AaronB, @Barbarossa
I think the Maze can be a great spiritual symbol – it suggests complexity, unknowability, a journey and pilgrimage through complicated and challenging terrain, the circular character of life and existence, and the navigation of difficulties before one emerges into freedom and light.
Importantly, it isn’t a linear straight line – the symbol of logic. Straight lines don’t exist in nature.
How NW Europe did not really have big ones until recently. And how in other places they may have been hemmed in by walls.
I consider that street-widening commissions were an early attempt to deal with the fact that cities are unnatural places, antithetical to our spiritual well-being. But it seems obvious that they failed.
Perhaps, in the future there will be new analogues, where people try to iron out the deficiencies of modern cities with new, grand plans. Perhaps, they will solve some of the problems, while not solving, or even creating others. I think it will be a while before we work out all the kinks, if we ever do.Replies: @AaronB
With respect to Lira and Ritter, you are going on with ad hominem attacks because what they said obfuscate you.Replies: @AP
You shouldn’t guess others’ motives. I was clear in stating that it was interesting to me that there is a pattern of people taking a pro-Russian side also being morally bankrupt. The fact that Ritter is a sexual offender whop preys on underage teenage girls doesn’t invalidate his points about Ukraine: his previous statements about Ukraine do that.
Disgraceful cuckery. Just disgraceful. Murkowski too; hopefully she’s done for this year. Susan Collins, well, Maine, not much you can when you’re forced to impress a pack of demshit voters. But fucking Romney, argh. Pure vanity, nothing more. Da First Black Woman on da Supreme Court – only an anesthetic could stop them jubilantly repeating that phrase. Yeah, racial oblivion may be forever, but that is nothing – nothing – compared to the moral glow of racial righteousness. This alone, no Jewish batteries required, will bury the white man.
Honestly, I don't think that there is much logical mirroring going on, in all of this. Many Eastern Europeans are saying, "Send Starstreaks, send Javelins, send fighter jets, killer drones, and tanks. Send everything including the kitchen sink, set up a NFZ, and risk WW3, and you are a villain or a coward, if you don't."
But what have they sent us, in the West? What "bravery" and what "help" have they demonstrated in our existential fight? We've been under attack for years. It is not a military invasion, but, then again, a military invasion would have fallen flat on its ass and been destroyed, in no time. No, the tactics have been adjusted, on an evolutionary level, to sidestep war, and, even to take advantage of it, when it happens in other places.
Not only have they not done or said much. (I've frankly seen practically nothing on the political end - those who still have states aren't using them to help). But many Eastern Europeans are laughing at us, and saying "Good riddance!" and "You deserve it!" And pretending that they are immune to it, when all the signs point to "not so much."
Ukraine seems to be saying "Welcome! Welcome! Use us as a base to assault the West! We are cheap, we can credential your Bantus, so that you can claim they are "doctors" and "Ukrainians." While nobody in the West has volunteered to be a Russian base.
Russian tanks rolling to the Atlantic is frankly an impossible scenario, but Globohomo going the other way seems more than probable. In fact, it already has "boots on the ground", in much of Eastern Europe.Replies: @AP, @Coconuts
They saved you from the Turks in the 17th century and from the Bolsheviks in the early 20th.
Islam in Europe:
Eastern Europe is the last reservoir of pure Europeans, with a largely traditional culture. It ought to be protected. Putin has sent Asian Buryats and Muslim Chechens to brutalize a piece of it.
The chutzpah AP, the Chutzpah of you people.Replies: @silviosilver
Sadly, the world is full of corruption. Imperfect humans are found on all sides of the conflict. Rashida Tlaib, a key voice for SJW Islam, supports Ukraine: (1) All Infidels (Jews, Christians, Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, etc.) need to be free of Muslim threats. George IslamoSoros and his Open [Muslim] Society Foundation exist to make Europe more SJW Islamic. Multiculturalist Jihadi invaders need to be expelled from all Christian lands. Not just Eastern Europe.
The obvious first step towards saving Christianity -- End the fighting between Christian Russia and Christian Ukraine.
PEACE 😇
__________
(1) https://www.foxnews.com/politics/squad-member-rashida-tlaib-delivers-progressive-response-to-bidens-state-of-the-union
https://twitter.com/Kharagket/status/1480223475746971656
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/25/Islam_in_Europe-2010.svg/1024px-Islam_in_Europe-2010.svg.png
Eastern Europe is the last reservoir of pure Europeans, with a largely traditional culture. It ought to be protected. Putin has sent Asian Buryats and Muslim Chechens to brutalize a piece of it.Replies: @songbird, @Wokechoke, @A123, @Dmitry
If Zelensky were truly an honorable man with the heart of a warrior, then I suppose, when he had all those eyes on him, he could have cut half a minute, from his endless speeches in order to say something like “Oh, and there may be Africans and Indians, or other people, falsely claiming to be Ukrainians. But don’t let them in, because we don’t look like that, and it hurts both of us, when you let them exploit your generosity and let them prey on you.”
But he didn’t. Even though, at the very least there seem to be tens of thousands of them, and more likely hundreds of thousands. He couldn’t take half a minute. Probably because he doesn’t care, and because he knows that it would hurt his potential for personal grift.
Instead, he was using WW2 to try to guilt the Germans (on the whole, I’ve never seen such a woefully-degraded and abused people – thought they aren’t all that way) into gibs and using MLK to build up blacks to Americans, as the ultimate in aspirational power. And trying to extract weapons from Ireland, as though it is a military power, or even the smallest country needs to have a bloody hand in the conflict, and can’t limit itself to humanitarian aide.
And no there are not 100,000s of Africans with fake Ukrainian passports lol.Replies: @songbird
So you are willing to allow the reduction of untouched Europe because blacks?
And no there are not 100,000s of Africans with fake Ukrainian passports lol.
Because Russian Ministry of Defence had no reason to lie about that. Years ago.
Because Ukraine has no other missiles, and has a reason to perpetrate a false flag attack and blame it on Russia. Ukraine has a reason to not let people flee the town, and Russia has no reason to attack a train station.
Russia might need to hit the railroad, but not the street in front of it, full of people. Even if Russia indeed tried to hit the railroad, but missed it, the choice of a cluster munition is inappropriate for the task.
And Russia has better missiles to use for it.
https://twitter.com/RWApodcast/status/1512572683803840517
https://twitter.com/SergeRousskikh/status/1512570338089050112
And no there are not 100,000s of Africans with fake Ukrainian passports lol.Replies: @songbird
It is not in my power to allow or disallow, though I would not categorize the place as “untouched.” In my living memory, most of Western Europe was better. To me, it looks as though it has been touched by globohomo with a heavy and aggressive hand. I saw one of Zelensky’s skits with a black at the supermarket.
From what I’ve seen, the number of “fake Ukrainians” is about 30%. And that might be an undercount, as tales of success spread, and inflation and trade disruptions take hold, to increase pressure. That’s easily hundreds of thousands, when all is said and done. It could even potentially be millions – that was the number with Syria, and it was not really a white country, for the most part.
I’m sure that they don’t all have Ukrainian passports, but they don’t need them. All they need to do is to get on the same buses and trains and say they are Ukrainians. That is our ridiculous reality. It is an ideology, driven from above.
They are fascinating creatures. Not the least reason being that they are not susceptible to rabies. As I see it, the single American (as in US) marsupial is a validation of the idea that we should be trying to bring back the great, extinct megafauna of Australia, as well as smaller beasts, such as the Tasmanian tiger.Replies: @silviosilver
I didn’t even know that possums could hiss – can they really? And I have an even harder time imagining a “monstrous” possum. Are you sure you weren’t dreaming?
Regarding extinction and the Tasmanian tiger, it hit me a bit hard when, back in 3rd grade, I learned that that animal had gone extinct. Unlike the dinosaurs, whose extinction had occurred eons ago (but knowledge of which also left me wistful), this poor creature had met that sad fate in our own day, which somehow made it seem “more real” (perhaps more threatening) to me.
I probably didn’t use these words to myself back then, but the thought, in one form or another, that “nature can be cruel” did occur to me. And nowadays I’d add that nature may be beautiful pines and glistening lakes, but it’s also blood and guts, muck and ooze, broken limbs, horrific disease, paralyzing fear, pain and more pain, all before the awesome finality of death. Not altogether a pretty picture, if you ask me.
“Nature, to be commanded, must be obeyed,” said Francis Bacon (AaaronB recoiling!). Nature must thus continue to be investigated, using the most precise tools of investigation at our disposal; we must never allow it to be sacralized by obscurantists and anti-humanists. To take a page from Thulean Fiend’s book, we must either bend that bitch to our will or heroically perish in the attempt. There is no other way.
Though it only scared me in the sense of a jump scare, and because I did not know about the rabies thing back then. I closed the door for a minute, and it was gone, and I also went on my way, out into the night. Everything is more impressive, when you are young and small, especially when you are not expecting to see it.
I once saw a squirrel inside a building that looked like a rat from the back because it was missing a lot of its hair, and when it turned around and I saw that it had a different face (not quite a squirrel's either, as it was missing the hair), the shock nearly stopped my heart. You don't expect to see "new creatures", in dark basements.
AP was ragged on me for being scared of a porcupine when it came directly up to me, when I was sitting with my toes up one night, and it sniffed the toe of my boot. (I mean like it nearly licked me) But I doubt he has ever had the experience of being greeted by North America's second largest rodent, which has rather poor eyesight and the power and tendency to chew through people's boots (when they are not wearing them) to get at the salt they leave in them.
BTW, raccoons can also make some weird noises (though I don't think hiss). I once had a cat that interacted with a young raccoon, when it was a kitten, and, though it sounds strange, I swear that with its purr, it tried to imitate some of the sounds, which I never heard another cat ever make. Though still extent, the Tasmanian devil is another good demonstration of this. Nearly killed off by a contagious cancer, spread by fighting, and like its own organism, though made with the DNA of a long dead devil.Replies: @silviosilver
Your beautiful quote, that one must obey nature to command her, does not suggest a fight, and does not suggest domination, but mutual cooperation, humility, and respect. This quote also shows that the law of non contradiction doesn't work when it comes to deep truths, as I said :)
Your sorrow at the death of dinosaurs and tasmanian devils makes very clear that you instinctively regard nature as sacred, and her destruction as killing something inside you :)
And that is to your credit.
Your decision to view nature as an enemy - and an object - can only come from a radical failure to see the "larger picture", the whole, that is a feature of thinking too much and too long in terms of logic and analysis, which is the disease all of us moderns suffer from.
I don't blame you at all.
I'm currently reading about how the concept of "two minds" manifests in certain traditions like Buddhism and Taoism - Buddhism used to call them original mind and ordinary mind.
Ordinary mind is the intellect, which alienates us from reality by placing a map in place of the real thing, and keeps us trapped in reactive emotion by losing sight of the larger context.
Original mind is direct awareness of reality unmediated by concepts.- spiritual practice is to situate ordinary mind, with it's narrow focus, back into the larger context of this more expansive awareness.
As a civilization, we have become completely trapped in ordinary mind, with it's narrow focus and anxieties, panics, and fears.
The way back is to cultivate an awareness of reality that is non conceptual - or rather, to situate concepts in a larger context, so we are no longer trapped in them.Replies: @AaronB
Lel.
Sword-wielding Sikh in Melbourne.
https://i0.wp.com/www.opindia.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/nn.png
ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ
So what are they then, supernatural? I guess humans may indeed be gods after all.
Yeah, this could go bigger. Maybe one concern is that vaporizing the “Maginot lines” would also vaporize a lot of civilians. And maybe they are still hoping that many units will surrender.
It is hard to tell, but it is shaping up as a total disaster for Ukraine. The others involved, Russia, EU, will get hurt but will get over it with time. Kiev is behaving as if they didn’t have any long term plans, as if it was all about now, about emotional drama – in effect they are being nihilists. An interesting art genre, but not a good way to run a modern country. This one is not just for the history books, this will be studied by psychiatrists.
Regarding extinction and the Tasmanian tiger, it hit me a bit hard when, back in 3rd grade, I learned that that animal had gone extinct. Unlike the dinosaurs, whose extinction had occurred eons ago (but knowledge of which also left me wistful), this poor creature had met that sad fate in our own day, which somehow made it seem "more real" (perhaps more threatening) to me.
I probably didn't use these words to myself back then, but the thought, in one form or another, that "nature can be cruel" did occur to me. And nowadays I'd add that nature may be beautiful pines and glistening lakes, but it's also blood and guts, muck and ooze, broken limbs, horrific disease, paralyzing fear, pain and more pain, all before the awesome finality of death. Not altogether a pretty picture, if you ask me.
"Nature, to be commanded, must be obeyed," said Francis Bacon (AaaronB recoiling!). Nature must thus continue to be investigated, using the most precise tools of investigation at our disposal; we must never allow it to be sacralized by obscurantists and anti-humanists. To take a page from Thulean Fiend's book, we must either bend that bitch to our will or heroically perish in the attempt. There is no other way.Replies: @songbird, @AaronB, @sher singh
Yes, and more impressively than cats, especially with their bigger fangs.
Though it only scared me in the sense of a jump scare, and because I did not know about the rabies thing back then. I closed the door for a minute, and it was gone, and I also went on my way, out into the night.
Everything is more impressive, when you are young and small, especially when you are not expecting to see it.
I once saw a squirrel inside a building that looked like a rat from the back because it was missing a lot of its hair, and when it turned around and I saw that it had a different face (not quite a squirrel’s either, as it was missing the hair), the shock nearly stopped my heart. You don’t expect to see “new creatures”, in dark basements.
AP was ragged on me for being scared of a porcupine when it came directly up to me, when I was sitting with my toes up one night, and it sniffed the toe of my boot. (I mean like it nearly licked me) But I doubt he has ever had the experience of being greeted by North America’s second largest rodent, which has rather poor eyesight and the power and tendency to chew through people’s boots (when they are not wearing them) to get at the salt they leave in them.
BTW, raccoons can also make some weird noises (though I don’t think hiss). I once had a cat that interacted with a young raccoon, when it was a kitten, and, though it sounds strange, I swear that with its purr, it tried to imitate some of the sounds, which I never heard another cat ever make.
Though still extent, the Tasmanian devil is another good demonstration of this. Nearly killed off by a contagious cancer, spread by fighting, and like its own organism, though made with the DNA of a long dead devil.
I have had very limited contact with wildlife, but to the extent that I have, I think I was less scared or grossed out when I was a kid. For example, I can remember two instances of snakes that slithered past near by without it even raising my heart rate. And for a short time I had this fascination with capturing spiders in jars (I didn't realize you needed to feed them, so they died pretty quickly lol). Nowadays, any snake I spotted in the wild would totally freak me out, and as for spiders, curse the twisted demiurge that created that most vile of species.
Last jump scare I had, there is track by the river near me that I like to go for runs/walks along, often in the dead of night. For a stretch of that track, there are these tall straws between the river and the track, and on a few occasions this small kangaroo, or maybe wallaby (I can't tell the diff), has gone hopping through them as I'm near by. It's happened a few times, and made me jump each time. This is quite close to the city center, not on the fringes of urban settlement, and I never would have thought I'd come across a kanga there.Replies: @songbird
Was thinking recently about cities.
How NW Europe did not really have big ones until recently. And how in other places they may have been hemmed in by walls.
I consider that street-widening commissions were an early attempt to deal with the fact that cities are unnatural places, antithetical to our spiritual well-being. But it seems obvious that they failed.
Perhaps, in the future there will be new analogues, where people try to iron out the deficiencies of modern cities with new, grand plans. Perhaps, they will solve some of the problems, while not solving, or even creating others. I think it will be a while before we work out all the kinks, if we ever do.
The winding narrow streets of European cities attract countless nostalgic tourists, while Dallas TX is a byword for urban soullessness.
I believe the wide boulevards were part of the modern drive to make cities efficient and practical. Modernity is also associated with a vast inhuman scale that is in stark contrast to the pleasantly human scale of older cities, as it's the age of the Machine.
As for cities, I think the hunter gatherers got it right - in small doses, these great agglomerations of humanity can be awesomely fun, exciting, and festive, and can add to the experience of human life (of course provided they are chaotic traditional cities brimming with life and not antiseptic modern cities that are tightly sanitized and controlled).
But fairly soon, one must return to the leave and beauty of nature.
@Silviosilver - nothing in nature exhibits straight lines, except perhaps the horizon - but that too is a curve upon closer inspection :)Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @silviosilver, @Triteleia Laxa
Regarding extinction and the Tasmanian tiger, it hit me a bit hard when, back in 3rd grade, I learned that that animal had gone extinct. Unlike the dinosaurs, whose extinction had occurred eons ago (but knowledge of which also left me wistful), this poor creature had met that sad fate in our own day, which somehow made it seem "more real" (perhaps more threatening) to me.
I probably didn't use these words to myself back then, but the thought, in one form or another, that "nature can be cruel" did occur to me. And nowadays I'd add that nature may be beautiful pines and glistening lakes, but it's also blood and guts, muck and ooze, broken limbs, horrific disease, paralyzing fear, pain and more pain, all before the awesome finality of death. Not altogether a pretty picture, if you ask me.
"Nature, to be commanded, must be obeyed," said Francis Bacon (AaaronB recoiling!). Nature must thus continue to be investigated, using the most precise tools of investigation at our disposal; we must never allow it to be sacralized by obscurantists and anti-humanists. To take a page from Thulean Fiend's book, we must either bend that bitch to our will or heroically perish in the attempt. There is no other way.Replies: @songbird, @AaronB, @sher singh
Silvio, your concern here is to avoid pain and death, and I get that. But what if fighting nature is precisely what invites pain and death?
Your beautiful quote, that one must obey nature to command her, does not suggest a fight, and does not suggest domination, but mutual cooperation, humility, and respect. This quote also shows that the law of non contradiction doesn’t work when it comes to deep truths, as I said 🙂
Your sorrow at the death of dinosaurs and tasmanian devils makes very clear that you instinctively regard nature as sacred, and her destruction as killing something inside you 🙂
And that is to your credit.
Your decision to view nature as an enemy – and an object – can only come from a radical failure to see the “larger picture”, the whole, that is a feature of thinking too much and too long in terms of logic and analysis, which is the disease all of us moderns suffer from.
I don’t blame you at all.
I’m currently reading about how the concept of “two minds” manifests in certain traditions like Buddhism and Taoism – Buddhism used to call them original mind and ordinary mind.
Ordinary mind is the intellect, which alienates us from reality by placing a map in place of the real thing, and keeps us trapped in reactive emotion by losing sight of the larger context.
Original mind is direct awareness of reality unmediated by concepts.- spiritual practice is to situate ordinary mind, with it’s narrow focus, back into the larger context of this more expansive awareness.
As a civilization, we have become completely trapped in ordinary mind, with it’s narrow focus and anxieties, panics, and fears.
The way back is to cultivate an awareness of reality that is non conceptual – or rather, to situate concepts in a larger context, so we are no longer trapped in them.
I don't work Fridays, as increasingly fewer Americans do (one of the few positive trends).
I was feeling a bit tired today and lay down in bed and just relaxed, doing nothing much, and just had the spontaneous idea to pray to God - I don't subscribe to any particular religion - but just to take prayer seriously for once and actually focus on praying to an "Other" - a mysterious God that I could not know or understand.
I felt my mind gradually emptying of all concepts and disturbances and the room becoming very vivid and clear, and drifting off into a deep sleep.
I woke up about an hour later and decided to walk to the grocery store to buy some avocados and bananas - I just got another shipment of raw cream for the bananas :)
As I stepped outside everything seemed remarkably vivid, clear, and luminous - as if a veil had been lifted from my eyes. It was a warm day and the air was incredibly soft and pleasant and the sunlight impossibly clear and luminous.
Everything seemed completely different even though it was exactly the same, and for once the incessant chatter in my mind was stilled - in fact I couldn't think of anything to think about and wasn't forming any concepts - an extreme rarity for someone like me who lives way too much in his head :)
I walked for about ten minutes in this vivid new reality with everything seeming so much alive and with a great sense of peace and relaxation.
Is this a small taste - but a taste - of what happens when you don't approach Reality through the mediation of concepts - a map - but apprehend it directly?Replies: @silviosilver, @sher singh, @Mr. Hack, @Barbarossa
Though it only scared me in the sense of a jump scare, and because I did not know about the rabies thing back then. I closed the door for a minute, and it was gone, and I also went on my way, out into the night. Everything is more impressive, when you are young and small, especially when you are not expecting to see it.
I once saw a squirrel inside a building that looked like a rat from the back because it was missing a lot of its hair, and when it turned around and I saw that it had a different face (not quite a squirrel's either, as it was missing the hair), the shock nearly stopped my heart. You don't expect to see "new creatures", in dark basements.
AP was ragged on me for being scared of a porcupine when it came directly up to me, when I was sitting with my toes up one night, and it sniffed the toe of my boot. (I mean like it nearly licked me) But I doubt he has ever had the experience of being greeted by North America's second largest rodent, which has rather poor eyesight and the power and tendency to chew through people's boots (when they are not wearing them) to get at the salt they leave in them.
BTW, raccoons can also make some weird noises (though I don't think hiss). I once had a cat that interacted with a young raccoon, when it was a kitten, and, though it sounds strange, I swear that with its purr, it tried to imitate some of the sounds, which I never heard another cat ever make. Though still extent, the Tasmanian devil is another good demonstration of this. Nearly killed off by a contagious cancer, spread by fighting, and like its own organism, though made with the DNA of a long dead devil.Replies: @silviosilver
Oh I see. For some reason I thought this happened recently lol.
I have had very limited contact with wildlife, but to the extent that I have, I think I was less scared or grossed out when I was a kid. For example, I can remember two instances of snakes that slithered past near by without it even raising my heart rate. And for a short time I had this fascination with capturing spiders in jars (I didn’t realize you needed to feed them, so they died pretty quickly lol). Nowadays, any snake I spotted in the wild would totally freak me out, and as for spiders, curse the twisted demiurge that created that most vile of species.
Last jump scare I had, there is track by the river near me that I like to go for runs/walks along, often in the dead of night. For a stretch of that track, there are these tall straws between the river and the track, and on a few occasions this small kangaroo, or maybe wallaby (I can’t tell the diff), has gone hopping through them as I’m near by. It’s happened a few times, and made me jump each time. This is quite close to the city center, not on the fringes of urban settlement, and I never would have thought I’d come across a kanga there.
One cobra was caught in a chain link fence, and a guy came and gently worked it out. And another was caught in a ball of fibers and a guy gave it a drink from a sprite bottle, and cut the fibers off. I think I also saw one, where a baby was surrounded by cobras.
But in America, the old timers tell me that they would kill rattlers on sight.
The Russian Federation sits atop 1/4 to 1/3 of the world’s resources. Real wealth like bauxite, oil, nat gas, palladium, potash…..not fake wealth like the stuff found in office desk drawers and compuker memories like annuities, reverse mortgages, insurance, stock and bond swindles. The globo-homo empire thought they had Russia’s resources lock up back in 1991 to 1993 when they parachuted in Jeff Sachs and his IMF jewboys to install a chit system and loot the place. An ex-KGB colonel moonlighting as a cab driver ejected the looters. The globo-homo empire has been pissed ever since, and still trying to bust up Russia and loot its vast resources……without starting a nuke war. Looks like the globo-homos will just have to be satisfied with looting two lesser resource states, Canada and Australia.
Your beautiful quote, that one must obey nature to command her, does not suggest a fight, and does not suggest domination, but mutual cooperation, humility, and respect. This quote also shows that the law of non contradiction doesn't work when it comes to deep truths, as I said :)
Your sorrow at the death of dinosaurs and tasmanian devils makes very clear that you instinctively regard nature as sacred, and her destruction as killing something inside you :)
And that is to your credit.
Your decision to view nature as an enemy - and an object - can only come from a radical failure to see the "larger picture", the whole, that is a feature of thinking too much and too long in terms of logic and analysis, which is the disease all of us moderns suffer from.
I don't blame you at all.
I'm currently reading about how the concept of "two minds" manifests in certain traditions like Buddhism and Taoism - Buddhism used to call them original mind and ordinary mind.
Ordinary mind is the intellect, which alienates us from reality by placing a map in place of the real thing, and keeps us trapped in reactive emotion by losing sight of the larger context.
Original mind is direct awareness of reality unmediated by concepts.- spiritual practice is to situate ordinary mind, with it's narrow focus, back into the larger context of this more expansive awareness.
As a civilization, we have become completely trapped in ordinary mind, with it's narrow focus and anxieties, panics, and fears.
The way back is to cultivate an awareness of reality that is non conceptual - or rather, to situate concepts in a larger context, so we are no longer trapped in them.Replies: @AaronB
Relating to this I had an interesting experience today.
I don’t work Fridays, as increasingly fewer Americans do (one of the few positive trends).
I was feeling a bit tired today and lay down in bed and just relaxed, doing nothing much, and just had the spontaneous idea to pray to God – I don’t subscribe to any particular religion – but just to take prayer seriously for once and actually focus on praying to an “Other” – a mysterious God that I could not know or understand.
I felt my mind gradually emptying of all concepts and disturbances and the room becoming very vivid and clear, and drifting off into a deep sleep.
I woke up about an hour later and decided to walk to the grocery store to buy some avocados and bananas – I just got another shipment of raw cream for the bananas 🙂
As I stepped outside everything seemed remarkably vivid, clear, and luminous – as if a veil had been lifted from my eyes. It was a warm day and the air was incredibly soft and pleasant and the sunlight impossibly clear and luminous.
Everything seemed completely different even though it was exactly the same, and for once the incessant chatter in my mind was stilled – in fact I couldn’t think of anything to think about and wasn’t forming any concepts – an extreme rarity for someone like me who lives way too much in his head 🙂
I walked for about ten minutes in this vivid new reality with everything seeming so much alive and with a great sense of peace and relaxation.
Is this a small taste – but a taste – of what happens when you don’t approach Reality through the mediation of concepts – a map – but apprehend it directly?
vs
Reject the Many for One.
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/640459736919048202/962291478187614218/CusNtrLXEAAR9ij.jpg
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/640459736919048202/962291477898227772/IMG_20170708_174451.jpg
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/640459736919048202/962291477625593896/SI_20180303_030242.jpg
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/640459736919048202/962291477357133844/1471543941.jpg
ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹReplies: @Barbarossa
I think we more or less have this as children, the ability to really see and feel the world in all it's truly wonderful and awesome strangeness, power, and wonder. I remember how that was as a child, savoring the world and feeling time stretch out before me. The span between my birthday and Christmas seemed to last forever, now it passes in a heartbeat.
It seems that as we become immersed in the adult world, we live more in our heads, dealing with the abstract, to the point that we live so much in the past or future or in abstract expectations and theorizing that there is precious little time to actually enjoy and experience what is right before us. One of things inhabiting the present, it seems to me, is God.
One definition of prayer, in my opinion, can be understood as the disconnecting of ourselves from the past/ future / abstract narrative that we constantly build and reinforce within ourselves and connecting to the immanence of the Divine in the present moment. A form of reestablishing lines of communication, if you will, and allowing oneself to be an open receptor rather than a broadcaster.
I sometimes wish that it was possible to live in that state more of the time, since as you experienced, it is tantalizing. I suppose that this is much of the point of the religious orders, and hermits; to create an environment where the cultivation of such a state of connection is prioritized. I should ask one of the monks of the nearby Trappist monastery what their insights are the next time I'm up that way.
Going back to time, one of the more distressing things about getting older is that time really does pass quicker and quicker. I suspect that this is mostly a perceptional issue as well stemming from the same factors I mentioned above. Although, even the very elderly feel that time goes increasingly quickly often times and one would think it might seem to slow back down in old age.
I used to be good about consistent prayer but I've gotten lazy, and have been the worse for it. Your experience reminds me that I should be better about it. I hope you'll keep up with it yourself. I think it's like any muscle, it's the sort of thing which grows stronger with exercise.Replies: @AaronB
Thank you utu and your clapping chorus of Ukrainian yihadists for bringing the level of this blog to the Saker's or Giraldi's: your level. Note that GR blamed all of you for his departure.
Eight years ago I had the audacity of posting my opinions on the killing of Donbass civilians with my full name on a Ukrainian forum. It was a respectful and reasoned opinion based on purely humanitarian arguments but I received personal death threats. I realized then that there was something toxic in Ukrainian nationalism, all the more so because I could easily recognize it from my own homeland: "join my fight or shut up and don't dare criticize me or I'll kill you too". I'm sure peaceful citizens of Ulster would also have recognized the attitude. Or people living in mafia territories, which is what Kiev was when I visited it in the 90s.Replies: @Greasy William
This was the first thing that jumped to my mind. There is truly a night and day difference in temperament between Sinn Fein types and just regular Catholics in Northern Ireland, even though regular Catholics also strongly support a united Ireland.
Maybe Ukrainians are just the Irish of Eastern Europe. Except a lot grouchier and with even worse food, if such a thing is even possible.
I don't work Fridays, as increasingly fewer Americans do (one of the few positive trends).
I was feeling a bit tired today and lay down in bed and just relaxed, doing nothing much, and just had the spontaneous idea to pray to God - I don't subscribe to any particular religion - but just to take prayer seriously for once and actually focus on praying to an "Other" - a mysterious God that I could not know or understand.
I felt my mind gradually emptying of all concepts and disturbances and the room becoming very vivid and clear, and drifting off into a deep sleep.
I woke up about an hour later and decided to walk to the grocery store to buy some avocados and bananas - I just got another shipment of raw cream for the bananas :)
As I stepped outside everything seemed remarkably vivid, clear, and luminous - as if a veil had been lifted from my eyes. It was a warm day and the air was incredibly soft and pleasant and the sunlight impossibly clear and luminous.
Everything seemed completely different even though it was exactly the same, and for once the incessant chatter in my mind was stilled - in fact I couldn't think of anything to think about and wasn't forming any concepts - an extreme rarity for someone like me who lives way too much in his head :)
I walked for about ten minutes in this vivid new reality with everything seeming so much alive and with a great sense of peace and relaxation.
Is this a small taste - but a taste - of what happens when you don't approach Reality through the mediation of concepts - a map - but apprehend it directly?Replies: @silviosilver, @sher singh, @Mr. Hack, @Barbarossa
Just to drop you a note: I made a start on McGilchrist’s “The Matter With Things” today. He had come to my attention through youtube recommends last year, and I listened to a couple of his talks before bed (trying to put myself to sleep, which is one way I deal with periodic bouts of insomnia). They were interesting and – dare I say – rational enough for me that I decided to give them a closer listen during my walks. He definitely got my attention, let’s just say.
So your recent posts about his work served as a reminder to me to read him. I decided on The Matter With Things rather than his earlier work because, frankly, neuroscience-y talk bores the pants off me. I am much more interested in the implications of findings about the brain’s operations than in understanding the workings themselves. I’m barely past the introduction, and so far, I have to say, I don’t much like what I am reading and I fear it’s only going to get worse. But I shall persevere – for fear of not following through on a public commitment, if no other reason.
The science becomes more interesting once you realize where it is all leading.
What specifically didn't you like about “The Matter With Things” so far?Replies: @silviosilver
The Russians are just as capable of using civilians as human shields as are the Ukrainians.
Have you ever considered that the Russians don't want the Donbas civilians to leave in mass for several reasons? They're there presumably to help protect the denizens there from being overtaken by the "Nazis". How might it look if they continue to hold on to these areas but yet the majority of its inhabitants have left, mostly to Western Ukraine and further West? It seems that the only story that Kremlinoids have let is to blame every single massacre on the Ukrainian side. If the photos aren't enough proof of what's been going on, you only have to listen to the eye witness accounts of those involved to really find out what happened.Replies: @Wokechoke, @Here Be Dragon, @Mikhail
The numerous Kiev regime lies get covered up. Prior to the Russian military action, up to one million Donbass refugees went to Russia, with another million from other parts of Ukraine doing likewise. This most recent strike wasn’t in a Russian/rebel held area. Kiev regime encourages people to either stay or go west.
The April 8 ABC Evening News telecast saw David Muir and the network matter of fact say that Russia launched a deadly missile strike, blatantly omitting the counter claim particulars. Let’s see how this one plays out.
https://www.rt.com/russia/553533-kramatorsk-missile-strike-origin/
How NW Europe did not really have big ones until recently. And how in other places they may have been hemmed in by walls.
I consider that street-widening commissions were an early attempt to deal with the fact that cities are unnatural places, antithetical to our spiritual well-being. But it seems obvious that they failed.
Perhaps, in the future there will be new analogues, where people try to iron out the deficiencies of modern cities with new, grand plans. Perhaps, they will solve some of the problems, while not solving, or even creating others. I think it will be a while before we work out all the kinks, if we ever do.Replies: @AaronB
Given that cities are unnatural and unhealthy, at least as permanent residences – I believe some hunter-gatherers would coalesce into these vast and festive cities on a seasonal basis – I think winding narrow streets stick much more to natural patterns and are more intrinsically satisfying.
The winding narrow streets of European cities attract countless nostalgic tourists, while Dallas TX is a byword for urban soullessness.
I believe the wide boulevards were part of the modern drive to make cities efficient and practical. Modernity is also associated with a vast inhuman scale that is in stark contrast to the pleasantly human scale of older cities, as it’s the age of the Machine.
As for cities, I think the hunter gatherers got it right – in small doses, these great agglomerations of humanity can be awesomely fun, exciting, and festive, and can add to the experience of human life (of course provided they are chaotic traditional cities brimming with life and not antiseptic modern cities that are tightly sanitized and controlled).
But fairly soon, one must return to the leave and beauty of nature.
ilviosilver – nothing in nature exhibits straight lines, except perhaps the horizon – but that too is a curve upon closer inspection 🙂
They're all out of my price range unfortunately. If I could afford to I would not hestitate to live there.Replies: @AaronB
(a) If nature is defined as "everything that exists" and I draw straight line, how can that straight line possibly not be a part of nature? Do spatial points exist in nature or are they too an illusion? Because if spatial points exist, then a straight line is simply defined as the shortest distance between them.
(b) Suffering and extinction are just as much a part of nature as joy and health, so if you're to infer from my statements what I - perhaps unbeknownst to my conscience mind - "hold sacred," surely it be would be life, not nature as a whole. Though even that would be a misreading, since I care zero about the life of, say, mosquitos or bacteria, and certainly not of spiders, every last one of which I would eradicate in a heartbeat if I but had the power (ecological consequences be damned).
@barbarossa Nothing specific really. Ironically, just the "holistic" feel the introduction gave me; a foreboding that it's all going to be tenuous guff, lacking any concrete distinctions that I can trust to increase my understanding of reality, and I will regret the time I wasted. But I'm not giving up yet, and I am prepared to be pleasantly surprised.Replies: @AaronB
I don’t know about them but I think all those defending the Ukraine are morally bankrupt and all the talk about the Ukraine defending its sovereignty and independence is bunkum. Once the Ukraine started hosting US bioweapons WMD labs with an intent of attacking Russia you can throw all those arguments out of the window. There has been extensive research done on what those biolabs were up to and they probably did do some test releases. Ron Unz has shown that US attacked PR China and Iran with a bioweapon WMD and others have shown that bioweapons have been used by USA on the Chinese agricultural sector. The Ukrainian bioweapons WMDs are part of this global network of US WMD biolabs so Russia was completely justified to enter the country and destroy them. This is no aggression but legitimate self defence against illegal WMDs by any international legal or moral standards. No doubts about it. In fact Russia would be totally justified in responding with gas WMD against a country that developed and used bioweapon WMDs, and gas can be contained to the target zones and would not spread far and wide unlike with the US’s bioweapon WMD attack on China and Iran. I know it sounds reprehensible to justify WMD use but US and all its allies who hosted those labs started it. In fact if Russia doesn’t have the capacity to occupy all of the Ukraine I would not object to it turning the Ukraine into a kind of huge Gaza strip that it will enforce a no fly zone over, lob missiles against any sign of military and WMD development and carry out military incursions to destroy any congregations of Nazis and mercenaries and generally keep the Ukrainians from rising again to threaten Russia’s security, lives, and well being. To Hell with such a Ukraine!
You do realize that Russia is the world’s leading country in terms of bio weapon programs and that anything Ukraine allegedly does was inherited from Soviet times and is a shadow of Russia’s programs (kind of like Ukraine’s string missile programs are junior versions of Russia’s).
By your logic, Russia should also get nuked. And maybe the USA too because you claim that it directs these programs.Replies: @Wokechoke, @Commentator Mike, @Mikhail
Not like the hate mongering neo-Nazi bigots including ambassador Melnyk and the undemocratically appointed neo-Nazi Filatov in Dnipro.
Another Kiev regime mayor was featured on a PBS NewsHour segment with Nick Schifrin, who is a vile anti-Russian propagandist. This particular segment included a blurred by PBS wall photo of Bandera in that mayor’s office as e referred to Russians as cockroaches. Likewise when no context given whenever the Banderite black and red flag is shown in Western mass media. Kiev regime-controlled Ukraine formally honors Bandera. Neo-Nazi is appropriate.
Maybe Ukrainians are just the Irish of Eastern Europe. Except a lot grouchier and with even worse food, if such a thing is even possible.Replies: @Yevardian
An American has an opinion about cooking. Certainly Ukrainian cuisine is better than Irish, imao.
Russia made it possible in 2014 and has accelerated it in 2022.Replies: @Wokechoke, @Mikhail
West Ukrainian academic Serhiy Kudelia, who is clearly not pro-Russian/pro-Donbass rebel nevertheless acknowledges the obvious about the majority of Donbass rebels being from Donbass, followed by other parts of the former Ukrainian SSR.
American revolutionaries greatly benefited from French support and the help of foreign mercenaries. Much if not most of the American Revolutionary War was fought among the American colonists.
NATOization of Ukraine has been ongoing.
https://www.eurasiareview.com/04042022-handicapping-ukraine-and-russia-west-differences-oped/
https://www.eurasiareview.com/11032022-what-russia-desires-oped/
Ron Unz calls for escuadrones de la muerte to save peace and help peace loving Putin.
Mikel should take a notice that killing some children can save his 7 years old daughter from a nuclear war. Perhaps Mikel should volunteer for the butchering of “wives and children” part.
You wrote: Metaphors have a vey limited usefulness when one is seeking a comprehension of complex events and processes. On the other hand, they are very effective in terms of emotional persuasion, and that is why I will try to dilute the effect of your comment by proposing alternative instrumentalizations of figurative speech.
The image you use -- home invasion followed by rape -- implies a use-and-discard situation. That is not the case here, so a slightly different metaphor is required: that of forced marriage. The role of EU and NATO would in this case be comparable to that of a young man whom the young maiden has chosen as a husband. This fellow has courted the young lady but in this time of danger he has not fully committed himself.
For fairness' sake, I shall provide a different metaphor which suits the pro-Russia side. Suppose that a man has a sister (or daughter) who has rebellious tendencies. She has been hanging with bad elements and has become addicted to drugs. He invades the place where she is living and tries to drag her by force to a rehab center. She puts up a fight. She asks her drug dealer friend for help. He can only do so much, etc.
----------------------
Now for your present comment.
Aside from your objections, which I endorse, Ron Unz's considerations are very silly because he wouldn't know who his targets were. Would the Trump supporters be included? What about John Mearsheimer? His theory of "offensive realism" is hawkish and he is anti-China. Would Ron Unz have him "butchered" eventually?Replies: @utu
I may just see if AaronB or Barbarossa bring up more agreeable topics of conversation while you and your mariachis take this forum to the same level as the rest of the site.Replies: @Barbarossa, @utu
Just as US invasion of Iraq is illegitimate so is Russia’s in Ukraine.
Honestly, I don't think that there is much logical mirroring going on, in all of this. Many Eastern Europeans are saying, "Send Starstreaks, send Javelins, send fighter jets, killer drones, and tanks. Send everything including the kitchen sink, set up a NFZ, and risk WW3, and you are a villain or a coward, if you don't."
But what have they sent us, in the West? What "bravery" and what "help" have they demonstrated in our existential fight? We've been under attack for years. It is not a military invasion, but, then again, a military invasion would have fallen flat on its ass and been destroyed, in no time. No, the tactics have been adjusted, on an evolutionary level, to sidestep war, and, even to take advantage of it, when it happens in other places.
Not only have they not done or said much. (I've frankly seen practically nothing on the political end - those who still have states aren't using them to help). But many Eastern Europeans are laughing at us, and saying "Good riddance!" and "You deserve it!" And pretending that they are immune to it, when all the signs point to "not so much."
Ukraine seems to be saying "Welcome! Welcome! Use us as a base to assault the West! We are cheap, we can credential your Bantus, so that you can claim they are "doctors" and "Ukrainians." While nobody in the West has volunteered to be a Russian base.
Russian tanks rolling to the Atlantic is frankly an impossible scenario, but Globohomo going the other way seems more than probable. In fact, it already has "boots on the ground", in much of Eastern Europe.Replies: @AP, @Coconuts
I think one of the problems is that a lot of ‘problematic’ opinions and perspectives from continental Europe are filtered out by the Anglophone media and with its particular ideological/cultural lenses. Unless you know the local languages or have some kind of long term contact with the countries it is harder to get a sense of this.
Like in Ukraine, it seems fairly clear that this is a war between two competing nations and national ideas, and something like the following view of national identity still seems quite pervasive in the region (even if it is held implicitly):
Imo Ukrainians (and Russians) are too involved in the immediate struggle and don’t have the depth of knowledge of Western/Anglo culture to know how to present this angle, and a lot of the big Western institutional supporters of Ukraine don’t want it presented either; their spin on the conflict is more that it is Ukraine’s attempt to break with any ethnic and historical influences and adopt the globalist version of liberal democracy they promote.
Because Ukraine has no other missiles, and has a reason to perpetrate a false flag attack and blame it on Russia. Ukraine has a reason to not let people flee the town, and Russia has no reason to attack a train station.
Russia might need to hit the railroad, but not the street in front of it, full of people. Even if Russia indeed tried to hit the railroad, but missed it, the choice of a cluster munition is inappropriate for the task.
And Russia has better missiles to use for it.Replies: @sher singh, @AP
Regarding extinction and the Tasmanian tiger, it hit me a bit hard when, back in 3rd grade, I learned that that animal had gone extinct. Unlike the dinosaurs, whose extinction had occurred eons ago (but knowledge of which also left me wistful), this poor creature had met that sad fate in our own day, which somehow made it seem "more real" (perhaps more threatening) to me.
I probably didn't use these words to myself back then, but the thought, in one form or another, that "nature can be cruel" did occur to me. And nowadays I'd add that nature may be beautiful pines and glistening lakes, but it's also blood and guts, muck and ooze, broken limbs, horrific disease, paralyzing fear, pain and more pain, all before the awesome finality of death. Not altogether a pretty picture, if you ask me.
"Nature, to be commanded, must be obeyed," said Francis Bacon (AaaronB recoiling!). Nature must thus continue to be investigated, using the most precise tools of investigation at our disposal; we must never allow it to be sacralized by obscurantists and anti-humanists. To take a page from Thulean Fiend's book, we must either bend that bitch to our will or heroically perish in the attempt. There is no other way.Replies: @songbird, @AaronB, @sher singh
https://www.instagram.com/p/B6Onsr1FzHK/
Lel.
Sword-wielding Sikh in Melbourne.

ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ
Absolutely not. Any country hosting WMD biowarfare labs has no legitimacy and its borders should not be respected just like the bioweapons released from those labs respect no borders. Even some Pacific islander could get sick and die from the products of such WMD bioweapons labs as has resulted from the USA WMD bioweapons Covid-19 attack on PR China and Iran, but would be quite safe from a retaliatory gas or nuclear WMD attack on the country hosting such WMD bioweapons labs as is Ukraine. In fact bioweapons are the dirtiest and worst WMDs as they have no limits in space or time since they can result in never-ending global pandemics while gas and nuclear attacks are mostly limited to the target area. So I wouldn’t bat an eyelid if Russia gassed or nuked the Ukraine as the UkroNazis were hosting these most despicable and evil WMD bioweapons labs and probably already used them in some pilot/test attacks. I’d feel sorry for the innocent civilians even though these WMD bioweapons labs may have been secret but what can I do about it? They should have got informed and pressured their governments to close all such labs otherwise incoming gas and nuke missiles are perfectly justified. And if you are informed about such labs, as obviously you are by reading the UR, and still backing the Ukraine which was armed with WMD bioweapons as has been proven with even Nuland confessing to it then you are pure evil yourself.
There are no consistent humanitarian principles that the west operates under. Ukraine is probably as bad as Russia if not worse historically.
My over riding concern is the immanent pauperisation of Germany over these illogical energy policies. Why can’t they be allowed to buy gas directly from Russia so that their industries and workers can do what they do best? No British American or Ukrainian has given a sufficiently convincing explanation.
I don't work Fridays, as increasingly fewer Americans do (one of the few positive trends).
I was feeling a bit tired today and lay down in bed and just relaxed, doing nothing much, and just had the spontaneous idea to pray to God - I don't subscribe to any particular religion - but just to take prayer seriously for once and actually focus on praying to an "Other" - a mysterious God that I could not know or understand.
I felt my mind gradually emptying of all concepts and disturbances and the room becoming very vivid and clear, and drifting off into a deep sleep.
I woke up about an hour later and decided to walk to the grocery store to buy some avocados and bananas - I just got another shipment of raw cream for the bananas :)
As I stepped outside everything seemed remarkably vivid, clear, and luminous - as if a veil had been lifted from my eyes. It was a warm day and the air was incredibly soft and pleasant and the sunlight impossibly clear and luminous.
Everything seemed completely different even though it was exactly the same, and for once the incessant chatter in my mind was stilled - in fact I couldn't think of anything to think about and wasn't forming any concepts - an extreme rarity for someone like me who lives way too much in his head :)
I walked for about ten minutes in this vivid new reality with everything seeming so much alive and with a great sense of peace and relaxation.
Is this a small taste - but a taste - of what happens when you don't approach Reality through the mediation of concepts - a map - but apprehend it directly?Replies: @silviosilver, @sher singh, @Mr. Hack, @Barbarossa
One as Many; Many as One.
vs
Reject the Many for One.
ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ
Perhaps that is what you mean? I would think that Sikhism is much more strongly geared toward this interpretation than Hinduism broadly. I'm not exactly an expert on Eastern religions though so perhaps you can clarify based on your own understanding.Replies: @sher singh
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/25/Islam_in_Europe-2010.svg/1024px-Islam_in_Europe-2010.svg.png
Eastern Europe is the last reservoir of pure Europeans, with a largely traditional culture. It ought to be protected. Putin has sent Asian Buryats and Muslim Chechens to brutalize a piece of it.Replies: @songbird, @Wokechoke, @A123, @Dmitry
The sales pitch to the Western European’s with the real heavy weaponry by the Impoverished Slav’s of Warsaw and Kiev and Bucharest is that “we are the last pure Europeans” soooo er um….”defend us!”
The chutzpah AP, the Chutzpah of you people.
You are arguing with two accounts who operate in bad faith.
There are no consistent humanitarian principles that the west operates under. Ukraine is probably as bad as Russia if not worse historically.
My over riding concern is the immanent pauperisation of Germany over these illogical energy policies. Why can’t they be allowed to buy gas directly from Russia so that their industries and workers can do what they do best? No British American or Ukrainian has given a sufficiently convincing explanation.
https://snyder.substack.com/p/russias-genocide-handbook?s=r
What Russians can achieve at most is the deletion of such specimens from Donbass. I repeat: if the captured ukronazis are starved fools like the one that I showed, they are even not usable as slave manpower. A shot in their heads is probably the most economical way to deal with them because they are beyond redemption.Replies: @sudden death, @Mr. Hack, @AP
utu, first off, a reply to a comment you wrote on the previous Open Thread (https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-183-russia-ukraine/#comment-5268103).
You wrote:
Metaphors have a vey limited usefulness when one is seeking a comprehension of complex events and processes. On the other hand, they are very effective in terms of emotional persuasion, and that is why I will try to dilute the effect of your comment by proposing alternative instrumentalizations of figurative speech.
The image you use — home invasion followed by rape — implies a use-and-discard situation. That is not the case here, so a slightly different metaphor is required: that of forced marriage. The role of EU and NATO would in this case be comparable to that of a young man whom the young maiden has chosen as a husband. This fellow has courted the young lady but in this time of danger he has not fully committed himself.
For fairness’ sake, I shall provide a different metaphor which suits the pro-Russia side. Suppose that a man has a sister (or daughter) who has rebellious tendencies. She has been hanging with bad elements and has become addicted to drugs. He invades the place where she is living and tries to drag her by force to a rehab center. She puts up a fight. She asks her drug dealer friend for help. He can only do so much, etc.
———————-
Now for your present comment.
Aside from your objections, which I endorse, Ron Unz’s considerations are very silly because he wouldn’t know who his targets were. Would the Trump supporters be included? What about John Mearsheimer? His theory of “offensive realism” is hawkish and he is anti-China. Would Ron Unz have him “butchered” eventually?
Because Ukraine has no other missiles, and has a reason to perpetrate a false flag attack and blame it on Russia. Ukraine has a reason to not let people flee the town, and Russia has no reason to attack a train station.
Russia might need to hit the railroad, but not the street in front of it, full of people. Even if Russia indeed tried to hit the railroad, but missed it, the choice of a cluster munition is inappropriate for the task.
And Russia has better missiles to use for it.Replies: @sher singh, @AP
Let me guess: you think Ukraine shot down the Malaysian plane.
A historic change just happened. As of today, a majority of Sweden’s parliament is in favor of joining NATO. The final holdouts on the right, the Sweden Democrats, changed their position from opposition to now supporting NATO membership.
A minor complication is that we have a minority government led by the center-left, and our current prime minister is decidedly more cool on the prospect. Will her views matter? Only in the short run.
The elephant in the room is Finland. Their entry into NATO now looks not only possible but outright probable. Our national security is deeply enmeshed with that of our eastern neighbors, going back centuries. Indeed, Sweden’s neutrality was in large part upheld thanks to our eastern flank, most notably during WWII and Stalin’s invasion.
The Finns will make their decision in the coming weeks and months ahead. If they decide to join, I suspect the chances of us following them are very high.
Sweden has been officially neutral for over 200 years and it’s a policy that has served us well, but the circumstances have changed. If Finland becomes part of NATO then we would be only Scandinavian country outside of it, which wouldn’t make much sense.
Of course, as members of the EU we already have a security commitment to our fellow EU states but this would deepen our involvement even further. Putin appears to have significantly miscalculated how effective his show of force would be in deterring any further entrants into the alliance.
I am in favor of disbanding NATO and replacing it with a pan-European superstructure, but that ought to be a longer-term goal. NATO membership is an acceptable intermediate step. Germany’s recent decision to boost their military spending by ~100 billion euros is the right path and many other countries are now following suit. It’s time to militarise Europe once more, and unite it under a massive security umbrella.
Sweden fought a battle with Peter The Great in Poltava, a stones throw away from the current battles in Donbas. After the Russians defeated the Swedes there, an unexpected win by Peter, the Swedish king had to flee to Istanbul and became a pseudo-hostage of the Ottomans. The Swedes then decided to stop being an imperium. After the chastening result of the battle Sweden gradually reduced its claims to the Eastern Baltic.
Sweden has a long and hostile relationship with the Russians. Russia turned Sweden into a post imperial neutral in Poltava.
Pointing to an Indian and calling him a Swede.
And "you" betrayed the Danes in 1864 and forsaked pan-Scandinavism.
Okay, there is another category of pro-Russians, in addition to criminals and sexual perverts: crazy people with paranoid delusions. This group at least is less morally culpable I suppose.
You do realize that Russia is the world’s leading country in terms of bio weapon programs and that anything Ukraine allegedly does was inherited from Soviet times and is a shadow of Russia’s programs (kind of like Ukraine’s string missile programs are junior versions of Russia’s).
By your logic, Russia should also get nuked. And maybe the USA too because you claim that it directs these programs.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonid_Minin
The Russians per se have not exported chemical, biological weapons. As Communists and post Soviet Ukrainians like Minin have dodged much of the blame.
As an independent observer my main concern is about threats of bioweapons from such labs to all of us. Otherwise I still think Russia's arguments for attacking seem more valid, and I wish it hadn't come to this but I can't see how it could have been avoided given the politics of Ukraine's leadership of choosing to be on the side of NATO and USA in a world where clear lines are being drawn.Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
https://www.rt.com/news/553601-poland-hungary-partners-ukraine/Replies: @Yevardian
This is a “polite” way of saying that yet again, Russia’s actions have pushed states near Russia to join defensive alliances protective against Russia.
Now Russians are histrionically shrieking about Finland’s “destruction,” which makes them a nation that reminds us all what true derangement looks like. Yes, transgenderism is eccentric and allowing mass immigration is overly kind, but these are bizarre luxuries from strength, while Russia’s antisocial and generally nutcase behaviour against much stronger forces is only compounding their many flaws.
A rich man with many friends may dress as a woman on Saturday nights and invite refugees into his house and he will likely be ok, but a poor isolated headcase cannot go around making obscene threats to everyone and invading and killing their neighbours.
Tinpot third world countries must realise what they are and not get wasted on their own progaganda which affects to thinking that America is the true tinpot third world country. People get too lost in their own ego-boosting rhetoric and prognostications. Sometimes, they need to remember to just look at the very basics of how the world actually is. Oil countries with GDPs less than Spain are not world powers. End of.
If COVID is an American bioweapon, Chinese Zero COVID policy that locks down all production is economic counter-warfare against America the manufacturing importer.
If you find the early science parts a little dry and boring, it may help to read the more exciting later parts that describes the significance of it all, and return to the science – I have been doing a lot of that kind of skipping around.
The science becomes more interesting once you realize where it is all leading.
You do realize that Russia is the world’s leading country in terms of bio weapon programs and that anything Ukraine allegedly does was inherited from Soviet times and is a shadow of Russia’s programs (kind of like Ukraine’s string missile programs are junior versions of Russia’s).
By your logic, Russia should also get nuked. And maybe the USA too because you claim that it directs these programs.Replies: @Wokechoke, @Commentator Mike, @Mikhail
The legacy of the USSR’s weapons programs. Ukrainian arms dealers like the Dual Israeli citizen Leonid Minin for example.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonid_Minin
The Russians per se have not exported chemical, biological weapons. As Communists and post Soviet Ukrainians like Minin have dodged much of the blame.
This is a little evasive but it’s interesting.
Sweden fought a battle with Peter The Great in Poltava, a stones throw away from the current battles in Donbas. After the Russians defeated the Swedes there, an unexpected win by Peter, the Swedish king had to flee to Istanbul and became a pseudo-hostage of the Ottomans. The Swedes then decided to stop being an imperium. After the chastening result of the battle Sweden gradually reduced its claims to the Eastern Baltic.
Sweden has a long and hostile relationship with the Russians. Russia turned Sweden into a post imperial neutral in Poltava.
Now Russians are histrionically shrieking about Finland's "destruction," which makes them a nation that reminds us all what true derangement looks like. Yes, transgenderism is eccentric and allowing mass immigration is overly kind, but these are bizarre luxuries from strength, while Russia's antisocial and generally nutcase behaviour against much stronger forces is only compounding their many flaws.
A rich man with many friends may dress as a woman on Saturday nights and invite refugees into his house and he will likely be ok, but a poor isolated headcase cannot go around making obscene threats to everyone and invading and killing their neighbours.
Tinpot third world countries must realise what they are and not get wasted on their own progaganda which affects to thinking that America is the true tinpot third world country. People get too lost in their own ego-boosting rhetoric and prognostications. Sometimes, they need to remember to just look at the very basics of how the world actually is. Oil countries with GDPs less than Spain are not world powers. End of.Replies: @Wokechoke
But they also grow their own food, unlike the Saudis. They also build their own weapons, unlike the Venezuelans, they grow their own luxuries like Tobacco, Cocaine, opium and distil their own alcohol. In addition to petroleum, natural gas and coal. Kursk has the best iron ore, it’s why Hughes built his factory in Donetsk…it’s endlessly endowed with everything but a few warm weather ports. The Anglo American strategy is to prevent them from having these ports. That’s all we should be concerned with. We can keep them out of the oceans. We can limit them to the inland seas. But that’s all we should stick our necks out for.
You probably think that would be great, of course.
Internet wannabe tough guy. Talking about "power is power" as if you have any idea at all about how militaries work. Or how you work. Do you know yourself at all?
And anyway, some Paradox computer game this isn't. Actual individuals live all throughout Russia, and their third world economy is going down and down. This is sad and will result in stunted lives, but not as sad or stunting as the evil they are unleashing in Ukraine. For both them and the Ukrainians. They should take their soldiers home.
Russia built their credibility and prestige on propaganda and a Potemkin military. They were ok to be poor if they could maintain that prestige and pride. But now the devil is coming to collect his due and Putin's pact has doomed them. Pride before reality is the path to hell.
The war gets worse for Russia every single day. I said that it would at the beginning. The Russian army shrinks. Russian equipment is destroyed. Russian morale plummets. Meanwhile, Ukraine only gets stronger. There's nothing Russia can do to get Ukraine to agree to peace, except withdraw. Russia cannot even threaten Kyiv again. They can only defend their skrinking gains, as their army breaks down in the field.
Russians support this, for now, for humans are generally too prideful to admit their errors and grow and change. But the tightening vice of reality will crack their solipsism. It will hurt, but they will at last be free. The only questions are how much it hurts and what they have left when they are freed.
"Power is power" you said, when I told you that Russia was f"cked. You wrote something about "13,000 tanks." But you have been substituting Russian progaganda for your sanity. Like someone who thinks they're a winner because their football team looks promising. Now you must surely know that you have no idea what power actually is. And open your mind a little and reflect on how things are, not how you want them to be.
You do not want to still be cheerleading this catastrophe of cruelty in one month's time. Your own soul is on the line, WokeChoke. Everything you "hate' is also what you are. Only from the position of seeing something in yourself can you truly understand it. And if you don't understand what you "oppose" you will always be wrong and you will always lose.Replies: @sudden death, @Wokechoke
The winding narrow streets of European cities attract countless nostalgic tourists, while Dallas TX is a byword for urban soullessness.
I believe the wide boulevards were part of the modern drive to make cities efficient and practical. Modernity is also associated with a vast inhuman scale that is in stark contrast to the pleasantly human scale of older cities, as it's the age of the Machine.
As for cities, I think the hunter gatherers got it right - in small doses, these great agglomerations of humanity can be awesomely fun, exciting, and festive, and can add to the experience of human life (of course provided they are chaotic traditional cities brimming with life and not antiseptic modern cities that are tightly sanitized and controlled).
But fairly soon, one must return to the leave and beauty of nature.
@Silviosilver - nothing in nature exhibits straight lines, except perhaps the horizon - but that too is a curve upon closer inspection :)Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @silviosilver, @Triteleia Laxa
Dallas has some of the nicest places to live on earth.
They’re all out of my price range unfortunately. If I could afford to I would not hestitate to live there.
To me, it is such a brilliant design because it is evocative of so many things. The difficulties to be solved in business and in navigating the right price. "Buyer beware!" And the moral quandaries that money and materialism can create. The potential for runaway greed, or losing sight of what is important.
There were at least a hundred and one great designs like that rooted in history and with moral resonance that the Euro currency could have borrowed. Instead, they chose very sterile designs, intentionally without any people on them. Designs that, I would argue, were evil, and which often replaced better designs, even without needing to delve deeply into the past.Replies: @AaronB, @Barbarossa
I think this picture may show the maze coin that you were thinking of. At their high point, ancient Greek coinage is really perhaps unsurpassed in it’s elegance and design. The relief is quite high as well which is notable too, giving their coinage a real depth and sculptural quality.
I was an avid coin collector as a kid, and had a fair number of Roman bronze coins since they are fairly inexpensive. Unfortunately, Greek coinage was far outside my pay grade. There is some Roman coinage in the higher denominations which comes pretty close to the Greek in technical ability, but overall the Roman coinage is far cruder and less artistically interesting. It is all political signalling, where the Greeks had an incredible variety of themes.
I completely agree on modern coinage. It’s completely graceless and ugly. An eyesore like the rest of the modern project.
I don't think that American money was always ugly, but it seems to have gotten uglier on a continuing trajectory.Replies: @Barbarossa
They're all out of my price range unfortunately. If I could afford to I would not hestitate to live there.Replies: @AaronB
Sure – but it’s not city living 🙂
As a city, Dallas sucks.
Although honestly, suburbs are pretty but soulles.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/25/Islam_in_Europe-2010.svg/1024px-Islam_in_Europe-2010.svg.png
Eastern Europe is the last reservoir of pure Europeans, with a largely traditional culture. It ought to be protected. Putin has sent Asian Buryats and Muslim Chechens to brutalize a piece of it.Replies: @songbird, @Wokechoke, @A123, @Dmitry
Are you saying that Ukraine supporters are paragons of morality? That would make Hillary Clinton and Hunter Biden avatars of superior virtue.
Sadly, the world is full of corruption. Imperfect humans are found on all sides of the conflict.
Rashida Tlaib, a key voice for SJW Islam, supports Ukraine: (1)
All Infidels (Jews, Christians, Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, etc.) need to be free of Muslim threats. George IslamoSoros and his Open [Muslim] Society Foundation exist to make Europe more SJW Islamic. Multiculturalist Jihadi invaders need to be expelled from all Christian lands. Not just Eastern Europe.
The obvious first step towards saving Christianity — End the fighting between Christian Russia and Christian Ukraine.
PEACE 😇
__________
(1) https://www.foxnews.com/politics/squad-member-rashida-tlaib-delivers-progressive-response-to-bidens-state-of-the-union
An old villager once told me: ‘I like the Anglos, they are very nice people, but they like to plunder‘. This is a problem for the rest of the world: some join in as second-tier plunderers, some resist, but most see it as an un-mutable reality until the smiling Western thieves show up. Everybody knows that at its core the West has mostly pretty words and weapons.
Russia’s resources are a real dilemma because the West desperately wants them but cannot accept that the locals would benefit. Something about a mental pecking order in the Western mind – we see it even here on a relatively smart forum all the time: the fast descend into hatred, lying and double-standards. It shows the Western deep unhappiness that it has turned out this way: Russians having it and the West wanting it. It drives them into hysteria. Deep inside they think it is unfair – as the witch-bomber once said publicly.
Anybody who thinks that this war is fought over who sets the language policy in Kiev, or how many tons of bee-droppings will EU import from Ukraine, is a simpleton. This is it: the assault on the eastern resources. It either works or the West will enter a slow decline – costs will go up and the reputation (‘soft power’) will inevitably follow. They may choose not to take a loss as an answer – and that’s where the danger lies.
You do realize that Russia is the world’s leading country in terms of bio weapon programs and that anything Ukraine allegedly does was inherited from Soviet times and is a shadow of Russia’s programs (kind of like Ukraine’s string missile programs are junior versions of Russia’s).
By your logic, Russia should also get nuked. And maybe the USA too because you claim that it directs these programs.Replies: @Wokechoke, @Commentator Mike, @Mikhail
It’s been three decades since the fall of the USSR so the Ukraine had plenty of time to close them down and destroy the bioweapons. Anyway, evidence has come to light that these WMD bioweapons labs are being funded by USA and the Pentagon and that the foreigners working in them have been given diplomatic status. Obviously nuking a nuclear power presents a problem of escalation which then could threaten everybody’s lives, even some Pacific islander, but a limited strike on a non-nuclear country wouldn’t threaten life on earth. Of course there are possibilities that USA has been funding similar research even in rival countries, such as say Wuhan in PR China, but has that really been conclusively proven? Has Ron Unz’s research shown that Covid-19 actually originated in that lab?
As an independent observer my main concern is about threats of bioweapons from such labs to all of us. Otherwise I still think Russia’s arguments for attacking seem more valid, and I wish it hadn’t come to this but I can’t see how it could have been avoided given the politics of Ukraine’s leadership of choosing to be on the side of NATO and USA in a world where clear lines are being drawn.
Probably german_reader’s decision is the right one. I’m going to take a break too. I get more than enough moronic takes everyday when I read the MSM with the difference that I’m not incited to debate them.
I may just see if AaronB or Barbarossa bring up more agreeable topics of conversation while you and your mariachis take this forum to the same level as the rest of the site.
I honestly just ignore most of the Ukraine stuff on here since after the first couple weeks it is the just the same stance on repeat. I'll be interested in seeing how it all plays out in the long term for all players involved, but there is precious little illumination going on here right now.Replies: @Sean
Is Ron Unz a Pol Pot of the 21th century?
vs
Reject the Many for One.
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/640459736919048202/962291478187614218/CusNtrLXEAAR9ij.jpg
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/640459736919048202/962291477898227772/IMG_20170708_174451.jpg
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/640459736919048202/962291477625593896/SI_20180303_030242.jpg
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/640459736919048202/962291477357133844/1471543941.jpg
ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹReplies: @Barbarossa
I have heard that in the minds of some Hindus that monotheism and polytheism are not really exclusive. The multitude of divinities in polytheism can be regarded as the innumerable facets in a great gem, each throwing their own distinctive light, yet still representing an unified totality.
Perhaps that is what you mean?
I would think that Sikhism is much more strongly geared toward this interpretation than Hinduism broadly. I’m not exactly an expert on Eastern religions though so perhaps you can clarify based on your own understanding.
https://twitter.com/EPButler/status/899362666560577536
The Cult of Mars for ex, would view him as the God of War, but also the Lord of Everything.
So they interpret everything with a warlike fervour.
ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ
Nazism means not just hatred toward Judaism. When Putin claim “denazification” he likely refers to those ones brainwashed by rabid Rusophobia. They are not just specimens like this starved tattooed fool I previously showed. There are many more variations of the sickness. For example the “journalist” that openly claimed that there is a necessity to kill 1.5 million of people of Donbass and expulse the rest to depopulate Donbass. The combination of extreme corruption seen in Ukraine, constant brainwashing and some sense of self-inflicted misery lead to such a kind of rotten specimens. Ukraine is plenty of them, and the Baltustans too. I think the “denazification” is hardly achievable because these rotten specimens are as a sort of metastasis.
What Russians can achieve at most is the deletion of such specimens from Donbass. I repeat: if the captured ukronazis are starved fools like the one that I showed, they are even not usable as slave manpower. A shot in their heads is probably the most economical way to deal with them because they are beyond redemption.
You can mention Azov but on the other had there is Wagner whose leader sports Nazi Tattoos. There is also Rogozin, a Russian government minister and head of their space program. Here he is giving a Nazi salute:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aI0eEH_ZuHE
And the Chechens while not Nazis are no better than them.
More to the point, while the whole post-Soviet space includes Nazis (or pseudo-Nazis) it is the Russian state that behaves as a fascist one, invading neighbors in aggressive expansionist wars and exterminating civilians while doing so. Your past whining about what was being done in Donbas by Kiev has proven to be disingenuous because you complain far less about much worse that is being done in the rest of Ukraine.
You are in very good company with the sex offender Scott Ritter, criminal Bentley and swindler Gonzalo.Replies: @Commentator Mike, @Mikhail
I may just see if AaronB or Barbarossa bring up more agreeable topics of conversation while you and your mariachis take this forum to the same level as the rest of the site.Replies: @Barbarossa, @utu
Hey, we’ve got possums, Kipling, Greek coinage, and mono/ polytheism going on over here!
I honestly just ignore most of the Ukraine stuff on here since after the first couple weeks it is the just the same stance on repeat. I’ll be interested in seeing how it all plays out in the long term for all players involved, but there is precious little illumination going on here right now.
Spontaneous detonation of an ambulance. LOL.
What Russians can achieve at most is the deletion of such specimens from Donbass. I repeat: if the captured ukronazis are starved fools like the one that I showed, they are even not usable as slave manpower. A shot in their heads is probably the most economical way to deal with them because they are beyond redemption.Replies: @sudden death, @Mr. Hack, @AP
You could have been promoted very fast as a ruling head of some soviet war prisoner open air camp in eastern Lebensraum circa 1941 with such useful utilitarian philosophy, despite calling yourself “antinazi” here 😉
I don't work Fridays, as increasingly fewer Americans do (one of the few positive trends).
I was feeling a bit tired today and lay down in bed and just relaxed, doing nothing much, and just had the spontaneous idea to pray to God - I don't subscribe to any particular religion - but just to take prayer seriously for once and actually focus on praying to an "Other" - a mysterious God that I could not know or understand.
I felt my mind gradually emptying of all concepts and disturbances and the room becoming very vivid and clear, and drifting off into a deep sleep.
I woke up about an hour later and decided to walk to the grocery store to buy some avocados and bananas - I just got another shipment of raw cream for the bananas :)
As I stepped outside everything seemed remarkably vivid, clear, and luminous - as if a veil had been lifted from my eyes. It was a warm day and the air was incredibly soft and pleasant and the sunlight impossibly clear and luminous.
Everything seemed completely different even though it was exactly the same, and for once the incessant chatter in my mind was stilled - in fact I couldn't think of anything to think about and wasn't forming any concepts - an extreme rarity for someone like me who lives way too much in his head :)
I walked for about ten minutes in this vivid new reality with everything seeming so much alive and with a great sense of peace and relaxation.
Is this a small taste - but a taste - of what happens when you don't approach Reality through the mediation of concepts - a map - but apprehend it directly?Replies: @silviosilver, @sher singh, @Mr. Hack, @Barbarossa
The God of the Trinity has opened a door for you to come in and get closer in spirit to him. He sees what a truly sincere seeker of the truth you’ve become and wants you to experience his being in a totally personal manner. Don’t let this experience go to waste, but try to continue to reestablish it as often as you can, right now. Waiting, or putting off your efforts in this vein may prevent you from further experiencing this wonderful visionary reality. I’d recommend immediately immersing yourself in the Gospel of St. John, fast a bit, and by all means continue your newfound prayer life. Regarding the “Mysterious God” that you’ve encountered, you’ll see him more clearly by reading the gospel that I’ve suggested. Also, consider these two passages to help you on your new journey, and to help answer some of your questions:
Be strong and do not doubt the visions that await you! This is great news!
Here comes LePen factor though – her victory is not sure ofc, but certainly realistic&possible option. Electionary current rhetorics is not that much different from traditionalist, but in fact she is still nothing more than variation of current Gerhard Shroeder in drag, so most likely Finland NATO bid will be veotoed by France in case of Macron loss.
I am actually kind of surprised that it isn't also Aaron B's favorite (as I recall he likes Kim, though I am not sure if he has read CC), but I suppose part of the pleasure of experiencing anything is having your own tastes.Replies: @AaronB
I actually haven’t read Captains Courageous – but I am now inspired to!
Kim is not just my favorite Kipling book, but one of my favorite novels of all time. I think I may have to reread it.
But then I find India infinitely colorful and fascinating.
Btw, songbird, Kipling said the only two places he ever wanted to live his life out in were Vermont and Bombay – and he wasn’t able to settle down live in either. He lived for a while in Vermont and fell in love with the place.
Kipling certainly believed in the white man’s burden and the superiority of Western civilization, but was deeply in love with the fascination of India and loved it’s culture and people – he would have happily lived out his days in Bombay. So he wasn’t quite the racist you think 🙂
I sometimes envy people who got to experience 19th century India – all the color and paegentry, with a much smaller population, and none of the ugliness that came later when the population exploded and modern industry and products began fouling up the place.
When I first started travelling to Asia my own attitude was similar to Kipling’s – I had a very innocent and unquestioned sense of my own superiority as a Westerner, and completely looked down on the “natives”, while all the while finding their cultures and lifestyles deeply fascinating.
Mt attitude was, in retrospect, amusingly “colonial” in an uncomplicated and innocent way that would be impossible today. But something about the region kept drawing me back.
It was only after many years of returning to Asia again and again – India, SEA, Japan, etc – and spending extended periods of time there that gradually the disquieting feeling arose that in many ways they may actually know how to live much, much better than us, and may in important ways be superior to our “rational” civilization.
I was later to discover that in this I was not in the least unusual – the diaries and letters of colonial administrators and various travelers are full of descriptions of how Asia led them to gradually question industrial civilization and the modern West, despite starting out with an uncomplicated conviction of Western superiority.
What Russians can achieve at most is the deletion of such specimens from Donbass. I repeat: if the captured ukronazis are starved fools like the one that I showed, they are even not usable as slave manpower. A shot in their heads is probably the most economical way to deal with them because they are beyond redemption.Replies: @sudden death, @Mr. Hack, @AP
I agree with some of your sentiments that you express here, however, I challenge you to see very similar forces at work within Russia too, unfortunately including Putin too. Ukrainophobia? The necessity to bomb and kill civilian enclaves? Extreme corruption? Constant brainwashing? Denazification/Demoskalization? It’s there on both sides, a very lethal mixture…
Kiev regime forces have blended in with civilians. Related are the Kiev regime forces using DHL vans and civilian ambulances for transport - the latter instance for transport not involving what ambulances are intended for.Replies: @Mr. Hack
Well, I just jumped on the bandwagon and picked up a copy of McGilchrist’s “The Master and His Emissary” so we’ll see.
What specifically didn’t you like about “The Matter With Things” so far?
Churchill’s cliche about future fascists calling themselves antifascists is true.
https://twitter.com/thesiriusreport/status/1512784323904258054?cxt=HHwWjIC-gfvUvv4pAAAAReplies: @AP
It looks to have hit right outside and afterwards the door opened.
The chutzpah AP, the Chutzpah of you people.Replies: @silviosilver
Where have you seen this argument being made? Certainly you haven’t seen it in mainstream debate. Even on these pages, where such an argument would not only be permitted but perhaps even expected, its absence is notable.
What Russians can achieve at most is the deletion of such specimens from Donbass. I repeat: if the captured ukronazis are starved fools like the one that I showed, they are even not usable as slave manpower. A shot in their heads is probably the most economical way to deal with them because they are beyond redemption.Replies: @sudden death, @Mr. Hack, @AP
Okay, you are a Nazi (not by the real definition but by your own definition, which seems to be – a murderous freak). Good to know. No wonder you were evasive when I mentioned the morality of pro-Russian figures, you fit into that category.
That is an essential and inseparable part of it. Nazis were a political party with a specific program. Jews were central to their program. You are playing the leftist game of changing language, redefining words, to suit your ideology and personal hang-ups.
And also the Russian journalist on state TV who said it was necessary to liquidate Ukraine’s elites and to bring death and destruction to the general Ukrainian population as atonement for their “Nazism?”
What does corruption have to do with Nazism? Nazis seemed to have been less corrupt than either Ukrainians or Russians.
Russian attitudes towards Ukraine and towards the war is a better example of brainwashing.
I’ve seen more swastikas in Moscow than in either Kiev or Lviv. They weren’t common in any of those three cities but they were certainly more common in Moscow among the three. Saw a guy wearing one on a t-shirt right on the main street, Tverskaya. Saw lots of graffiti with swastikas (accompanied by messages such as Azeris out). Saw skinheads hunting down an African on a subway. I didn’t have to search for this stuff on youtube, I only had to spend time in Moscow.
You can mention Azov but on the other had there is Wagner whose leader sports Nazi Tattoos. There is also Rogozin, a Russian government minister and head of their space program. Here he is giving a Nazi salute:
And the Chechens while not Nazis are no better than them.
More to the point, while the whole post-Soviet space includes Nazis (or pseudo-Nazis) it is the Russian state that behaves as a fascist one, invading neighbors in aggressive expansionist wars and exterminating civilians while doing so. Your past whining about what was being done in Donbas by Kiev has proven to be disingenuous because you complain far less about much worse that is being done in the rest of Ukraine.
You are in very good company with the sex offender Scott Ritter, criminal Bentley and swindler Gonzalo.
How about the world's leading bioweapons expert Francis Boyle? He is convinced that those WMD bioweapons labs in the Ukraine were actually carrying out bioweapons research aimed at Russia and that all who work in them deserve life in prison. So this is on top of Nuland's confession under oath. I myself do get agitated about this issue like others get agitated about all sorts of other issues because we can all end up being their victims no matter where in the world they may be and therefore I am quite prepared to accept Russian actions, which I would normally consider unacceptable and despicable, against a country hosting these labs, such as the Ukraine. Then on top of those bioweapons WMD labs we have the crimes against humanity by the Azov Nazis and others, the dual national Zionist leader, politicians and oligarchs, talk of developing a nuclear programme and dirty bombs, etc. So the case is closed; no matter how bad the Russians may be the Ukrainians are the greater evil, far greater evil, so I can't feel much sympathy for them when they get whatever they've got coming their way. It's sad and tragic but unavoidable and in the end well deserved.Replies: @AP
As an independent observer my main concern is about threats of bioweapons from such labs to all of us. Otherwise I still think Russia's arguments for attacking seem more valid, and I wish it hadn't come to this but I can't see how it could have been avoided given the politics of Ukraine's leadership of choosing to be on the side of NATO and USA in a world where clear lines are being drawn.Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
The evidence is top secret. So all we know for a fact is somebody is hiding something. Like the top secret investigation of the passenger airline attack over Ukraine. Ukraine says it was the Russians. Russia says it was the Ukrainians. The Dutch (jet departure) and Malaysians (destination & jet owner) have seen the black box and evidence and they aren’t revealing it. Not by their choice we might probably guess.
You can mention Azov but on the other had there is Wagner whose leader sports Nazi Tattoos. There is also Rogozin, a Russian government minister and head of their space program. Here he is giving a Nazi salute:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aI0eEH_ZuHE
And the Chechens while not Nazis are no better than them.
More to the point, while the whole post-Soviet space includes Nazis (or pseudo-Nazis) it is the Russian state that behaves as a fascist one, invading neighbors in aggressive expansionist wars and exterminating civilians while doing so. Your past whining about what was being done in Donbas by Kiev has proven to be disingenuous because you complain far less about much worse that is being done in the rest of Ukraine.
You are in very good company with the sex offender Scott Ritter, criminal Bentley and swindler Gonzalo.Replies: @Commentator Mike, @Mikhail
That is a low blow and you should stick to arguments.
How about the world’s leading bioweapons expert Francis Boyle? He is convinced that those WMD bioweapons labs in the Ukraine were actually carrying out bioweapons research aimed at Russia and that all who work in them deserve life in prison. So this is on top of Nuland’s confession under oath. I myself do get agitated about this issue like others get agitated about all sorts of other issues because we can all end up being their victims no matter where in the world they may be and therefore I am quite prepared to accept Russian actions, which I would normally consider unacceptable and despicable, against a country hosting these labs, such as the Ukraine. Then on top of those bioweapons WMD labs we have the crimes against humanity by the Azov Nazis and others, the dual national Zionist leader, politicians and oligarchs, talk of developing a nuclear programme and dirty bombs, etc. So the case is closed; no matter how bad the Russians may be the Ukrainians are the greater evil, far greater evil, so I can’t feel much sympathy for them when they get whatever they’ve got coming their way. It’s sad and tragic but unavoidable and in the end well deserved.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francis_Boyle
Sincere question:
What is your opinion of 9-11? The Q Anon stuff? The Holocaust?Replies: @Commentator Mike
I honestly just ignore most of the Ukraine stuff on here since after the first couple weeks it is the just the same stance on repeat. I'll be interested in seeing how it all plays out in the long term for all players involved, but there is precious little illumination going on here right now.Replies: @Sean
Russia appears to believe its survival is at stake so they will not quit. The US will not let Putin get anything he can claim as a victory, so they will not stop helping Ukraine. With Barbarosa it took 4 years to win back what was taken in 4 months. It is going to go on another year I think.
Wonder who of those fully uniformed people on left reincarnated as modern rib counter Aedib?

I think this picture may show the maze coin that you were thinking of. At their high point, ancient Greek coinage is really perhaps unsurpassed in it's elegance and design. The relief is quite high as well which is notable too, giving their coinage a real depth and sculptural quality.
I was an avid coin collector as a kid, and had a fair number of Roman bronze coins since they are fairly inexpensive. Unfortunately, Greek coinage was far outside my pay grade. There is some Roman coinage in the higher denominations which comes pretty close to the Greek in technical ability, but overall the Roman coinage is far cruder and less artistically interesting. It is all political signalling, where the Greeks had an incredible variety of themes.
I completely agree on modern coinage. It's completely graceless and ugly. An eyesore like the rest of the modern project.Replies: @songbird, @S
I think the earliest one has a circular design, which I believe is more elegant. But I am having trouble establishing a chronology.
There seems to be a bit of an historical parallelism here. The Greek city-states were a rich tapestry, with interesting coins, like nation-states. But the coins of the Roman Empire, in a loose way, resembled more the soulless money of the EU. Perhaps, to an extent, also of China (where Mao is on everything) and the US, the other behemoths.
I don’t think that American money was always ugly, but it seems to have gotten uglier on a continuing trajectory.
http://www.tbnumismatics.com/mistaken-misogyny-andrew-mellon-laura-fraser--the-george-washington-portraiture.html
There may be a "woke" angle to changing the portrait of Washington right now, but the update is by far the superior design so it may be a case of the right choice for the wrong reasons.
I think the change in American coinage in the middle and second half of the 20th century is symbolic of the death of America the nation and the ascendance of America the Empire. The designs went from various symbolic depictions of Liberty to the bland visages of dead leaders.
As you say, it parallels the differences between Greek and Roman coinage.Replies: @songbird, @S, @RadicalCenter
The winding narrow streets of European cities attract countless nostalgic tourists, while Dallas TX is a byword for urban soullessness.
I believe the wide boulevards were part of the modern drive to make cities efficient and practical. Modernity is also associated with a vast inhuman scale that is in stark contrast to the pleasantly human scale of older cities, as it's the age of the Machine.
As for cities, I think the hunter gatherers got it right - in small doses, these great agglomerations of humanity can be awesomely fun, exciting, and festive, and can add to the experience of human life (of course provided they are chaotic traditional cities brimming with life and not antiseptic modern cities that are tightly sanitized and controlled).
But fairly soon, one must return to the leave and beauty of nature.
@Silviosilver - nothing in nature exhibits straight lines, except perhaps the horizon - but that too is a curve upon closer inspection :)Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @silviosilver, @Triteleia Laxa
Should I assume this conceptual lassitude was brought on by overdosing on holism? 🙂
(a) If nature is defined as “everything that exists” and I draw straight line, how can that straight line possibly not be a part of nature? Do spatial points exist in nature or are they too an illusion? Because if spatial points exist, then a straight line is simply defined as the shortest distance between them.
(b) Suffering and extinction are just as much a part of nature as joy and health, so if you’re to infer from my statements what I – perhaps unbeknownst to my conscience mind – “hold sacred,” surely it be would be life, not nature as a whole. Though even that would be a misreading, since I care zero about the life of, say, mosquitos or bacteria, and certainly not of spiders, every last one of which I would eradicate in a heartbeat if I but had the power (ecological consequences be damned).
@barbarossa
Nothing specific really. Ironically, just the “holistic” feel the introduction gave me; a foreboding that it’s all going to be tenuous guff, lacking any concrete distinctions that I can trust to increase my understanding of reality, and I will regret the time I wasted. But I’m not giving up yet, and I am prepared to be pleasantly surprised.
These abstractions can help navigate the world, but they don't exist - and we shouldn't confuse the map for the territory.
You will not find physical objects describing straight lines in the real world - but you can certainly super-impose a conceptual net on the physical world in order to help you navigate it in certain ways.
But on the higher level of understanding and not power, one must realize the conceptual net isn't reality.
If you read the fascinating philosophy of Kant, it becomes clear that a significant portion of our concepts are simply super-imposed on the world and do not describe reality.
Quantum mechanics - in which the law of non contradiction does not hold - similarly shows that out conceptual net is super-imposed on reality.
Concepts are highly useful - but when we lose sight of the larger context that they are just approximate maps, we descend into scientism.
As for pain and death being part of nature, absolutely - however, it is still possible that the greatest flourishing if life is only possible by accepting nature and cooperating with it.
For instance, it's been said that you must lose your life to save it - in other words, being preoccupied with cheating death may cause you to suffer endemic anxiety and lose vitality and engagement with life.
Isn't the devitalized condition of modern man a result of his preoccupation with cheating death?
Similarly, avoiding pain as a priority interferes with many activities that enhance the feeling of aliveness, and interfere with growth that increases life.
Life itself depends on a process of death and renewal - anyone who favors life may well embrace death :)
If you see yourself as part of the larger system of nature, as an expression of it's energies, death isn't extinction but simply a transformation.
You are thinking too much with your left hemisphere :)Replies: @AaronB, @silviosilver
Busy weekend in UA capital:
Oh great, they’ll be able to live like the 19th Century then.
You probably think that would be great, of course.
Internet wannabe tough guy. Talking about “power is power” as if you have any idea at all about how militaries work. Or how you work. Do you know yourself at all?
And anyway, some Paradox computer game this isn’t. Actual individuals live all throughout Russia, and their third world economy is going down and down. This is sad and will result in stunted lives, but not as sad or stunting as the evil they are unleashing in Ukraine. For both them and the Ukrainians. They should take their soldiers home.
Russia built their credibility and prestige on propaganda and a Potemkin military. They were ok to be poor if they could maintain that prestige and pride. But now the devil is coming to collect his due and Putin’s pact has doomed them. Pride before reality is the path to hell.
The war gets worse for Russia every single day. I said that it would at the beginning. The Russian army shrinks. Russian equipment is destroyed. Russian morale plummets. Meanwhile, Ukraine only gets stronger. There’s nothing Russia can do to get Ukraine to agree to peace, except withdraw. Russia cannot even threaten Kyiv again. They can only defend their skrinking gains, as their army breaks down in the field.
Russians support this, for now, for humans are generally too prideful to admit their errors and grow and change. But the tightening vice of reality will crack their solipsism. It will hurt, but they will at last be free. The only questions are how much it hurts and what they have left when they are freed.
“Power is power” you said, when I told you that Russia was f”cked. You wrote something about “13,000 tanks.” But you have been substituting Russian progaganda for your sanity. Like someone who thinks they’re a winner because their football team looks promising. Now you must surely know that you have no idea what power actually is. And open your mind a little and reflect on how things are, not how you want them to be.
You do not want to still be cheerleading this catastrophe of cruelty in one month’s time. Your own soul is on the line, WokeChoke. Everything you “hate’ is also what you are. Only from the position of seeing something in yourself can you truly understand it. And if you don’t understand what you “oppose” you will always be wrong and you will always lose.
The winding narrow streets of European cities attract countless nostalgic tourists, while Dallas TX is a byword for urban soullessness.
I believe the wide boulevards were part of the modern drive to make cities efficient and practical. Modernity is also associated with a vast inhuman scale that is in stark contrast to the pleasantly human scale of older cities, as it's the age of the Machine.
As for cities, I think the hunter gatherers got it right - in small doses, these great agglomerations of humanity can be awesomely fun, exciting, and festive, and can add to the experience of human life (of course provided they are chaotic traditional cities brimming with life and not antiseptic modern cities that are tightly sanitized and controlled).
But fairly soon, one must return to the leave and beauty of nature.
@Silviosilver - nothing in nature exhibits straight lines, except perhaps the horizon - but that too is a curve upon closer inspection :)Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @silviosilver, @Triteleia Laxa
Everything human is also natural. Stop projecting your own sense of soulessness onto the world. Then maybe, and without distraction, you will finally learn the nature of your own soul.
I think it is an arguable point to consider cities unnatural as AaronB as stated and it could be an interesting argument to boot. However, you haven't done anything but dismiss the point out of hand by setting up an unsupported tautology.
Humans seem to be quite unique among the animals in their capability of innovation and transcending natural boundaries. Synthetic pesticides, space travel, or nuclear weapons are hardly "natural" because they represent a fundamental reordering of matter and reality. This is in contrast to pre-modern innovation that repurposed or optimized natural materials or processes. It's fine with me if you choose to embrace the un-natural as something good or neutral, by why pretend as though there is no distinction?Replies: @showmethereal, @Triteleia Laxa
This is a wonderful idea, but one that we probably will not have the resources to implement the way things are going. There will be no surplus to spend rewarding activities that are tangibly productive of drinkable water, food, clothing, medicine, and not much else.
You probably think that would be great, of course.
Internet wannabe tough guy. Talking about "power is power" as if you have any idea at all about how militaries work. Or how you work. Do you know yourself at all?
And anyway, some Paradox computer game this isn't. Actual individuals live all throughout Russia, and their third world economy is going down and down. This is sad and will result in stunted lives, but not as sad or stunting as the evil they are unleashing in Ukraine. For both them and the Ukrainians. They should take their soldiers home.
Russia built their credibility and prestige on propaganda and a Potemkin military. They were ok to be poor if they could maintain that prestige and pride. But now the devil is coming to collect his due and Putin's pact has doomed them. Pride before reality is the path to hell.
The war gets worse for Russia every single day. I said that it would at the beginning. The Russian army shrinks. Russian equipment is destroyed. Russian morale plummets. Meanwhile, Ukraine only gets stronger. There's nothing Russia can do to get Ukraine to agree to peace, except withdraw. Russia cannot even threaten Kyiv again. They can only defend their skrinking gains, as their army breaks down in the field.
Russians support this, for now, for humans are generally too prideful to admit their errors and grow and change. But the tightening vice of reality will crack their solipsism. It will hurt, but they will at last be free. The only questions are how much it hurts and what they have left when they are freed.
"Power is power" you said, when I told you that Russia was f"cked. You wrote something about "13,000 tanks." But you have been substituting Russian progaganda for your sanity. Like someone who thinks they're a winner because their football team looks promising. Now you must surely know that you have no idea what power actually is. And open your mind a little and reflect on how things are, not how you want them to be.
You do not want to still be cheerleading this catastrophe of cruelty in one month's time. Your own soul is on the line, WokeChoke. Everything you "hate' is also what you are. Only from the position of seeing something in yourself can you truly understand it. And if you don't understand what you "oppose" you will always be wrong and you will always lose.Replies: @sudden death, @Wokechoke
Without any irony, they would like to and agree joyfully as long as it would mean the same territorial scope as Tzar empire had then. It’s a powerful mental drug, no much different than physical substances, when your own limbs or veins might be outright rotting, but being high is still more attractive option as warped imagination under the influence does not care about such details.
(a) If nature is defined as "everything that exists" and I draw straight line, how can that straight line possibly not be a part of nature? Do spatial points exist in nature or are they too an illusion? Because if spatial points exist, then a straight line is simply defined as the shortest distance between them.
(b) Suffering and extinction are just as much a part of nature as joy and health, so if you're to infer from my statements what I - perhaps unbeknownst to my conscience mind - "hold sacred," surely it be would be life, not nature as a whole. Though even that would be a misreading, since I care zero about the life of, say, mosquitos or bacteria, and certainly not of spiders, every last one of which I would eradicate in a heartbeat if I but had the power (ecological consequences be damned).
@barbarossa Nothing specific really. Ironically, just the "holistic" feel the introduction gave me; a foreboding that it's all going to be tenuous guff, lacking any concrete distinctions that I can trust to increase my understanding of reality, and I will regret the time I wasted. But I'm not giving up yet, and I am prepared to be pleasantly surprised.Replies: @AaronB
It’s a well known fact that points don’t exist but are abstractions – and straight lines between points are abstractions too.
These abstractions can help navigate the world, but they don’t exist – and we shouldn’t confuse the map for the territory.
You will not find physical objects describing straight lines in the real world – but you can certainly super-impose a conceptual net on the physical world in order to help you navigate it in certain ways.
But on the higher level of understanding and not power, one must realize the conceptual net isn’t reality.
If you read the fascinating philosophy of Kant, it becomes clear that a significant portion of our concepts are simply super-imposed on the world and do not describe reality.
Quantum mechanics – in which the law of non contradiction does not hold – similarly shows that out conceptual net is super-imposed on reality.
Concepts are highly useful – but when we lose sight of the larger context that they are just approximate maps, we descend into scientism.
As for pain and death being part of nature, absolutely – however, it is still possible that the greatest flourishing if life is only possible by accepting nature and cooperating with it.
For instance, it’s been said that you must lose your life to save it – in other words, being preoccupied with cheating death may cause you to suffer endemic anxiety and lose vitality and engagement with life.
Isn’t the devitalized condition of modern man a result of his preoccupation with cheating death?
Similarly, avoiding pain as a priority interferes with many activities that enhance the feeling of aliveness, and interfere with growth that increases life.
Life itself depends on a process of death and renewal – anyone who favors life may well embrace death 🙂
If you see yourself as part of the larger system of nature, as an expression of it’s energies, death isn’t extinction but simply a transformation.
You are thinking too much with your left hemisphere 🙂
The left hemisphere sees only concrete distinctions, so to the left brain you are a distinct individual with no connection to any larger whole or a larger purpose.
Of course, if that's your assumption then death will seem like final extinction and pain will see pointless.
However, the nature of the left brain is to have a very narrow focus - so it can't "zoom out" and see the larger picture. (It's function is to zoom in - it's the emissary of the general-master, whose function is to see the larger whole)
It's stuck.
Problem is, even the logical and analytical side of the left brain can see a serious problem. On the one hand, even logic can tell you that in countless ways humans flourish best when obeying nature and life is promoted following nature's "laws".
Yet the left brain view view of concrete distinctions also necessarily creates an inescapable drive to escape nature - "disobey" nature - because it cannot help but see death as extinction and pain as pointless, since we are not connected to any larger whole with a purpose.
So it's trapped in a paradox that can only be resolved by "widening out" into the larger and more inclusive right hemisphere thinking.
If we fail to do that, we remain trapped in self-defeating paradox, which consistently leads to actions that fail to achieve what we want and undercut our ability to flourish.
We make physical survival a priority - and the result is an epidemic of anxiety and widespread loss of vitality and engagement with life.
But the right hemisphere, which can see the larger picture, can integrate paradox and understand that one ptomotes life and vitality by accepting death.
I guess this is where you play the get-out-of-jail-free card of abandoning non-contradiction. :)
How exactly dismissing a concept like spatial points helps one to better appreciate reality is beyond me. Even if you want to use a word like "illusion" to describe them, there's a clear difference between the "illusion" of spatial points, which we can apply to the physical world and use them to aid us in getting to where we want to go and finding things in places where people assure us they are located - nowadays with uncanny accuracy - and the illusion of a mirage in the desert, which is completely unreliable. Valuing nature is highly useful - but when we lose sight of the larger context that nature is both friend and foe, we descend into naturism. Alternatively, the urgency you feel may cause you to do something about it - and, miracle of miracles, perhaps even prevail - rather than timidly surrender to its inevitability.
Nothing easier than to tar someone as being "preoccupied" or "obsessed" with something. You simply set the tripwire at the mere mention of a thing. You mentioned black crime? Oh you're "obsessed" with it. You want to talk about prolonging life (beyond the span miserly nature has seen fit to extend)? You're preoccupied with it. Easy peasy.Replies: @AaronB
It sounds like some of his other books must be interesting as well.
Wiki: In Wandering in Northern China (1923), he visited Korea, which had been a Japanese colony since 1910. The first thing he noted was that Korea was virtually devoid of trees.[2] The aristocracy had been stripped of their duties but were allowed to wear the unique attire of their rank, although many were living in poverty. Franck reported that the women “displayed to the public gaze exactly that portion of the torso which the women of most nations take pains to conceal.”
List of his works:
A Vagabond Journey Around the World (1910)[7]
Four Months Afoot in Spain (1911)
Zone Policeman 88 (1913)
Bussy Destroyer 2000 Machine Shop (1969)
Tramping Through Mexico, Guatemala, and Honduras (1916)
Vagabonding Down the Andes (1917)
Vagabonding Through Changing Germany (1920)
Roaming Through the West Indies (1920)
Working North from Patagonia (1921)
Wandering in Northern China (1923)
Glimpses of Japan and Formosa (1924)
Roving Through Southern China (1925)
All About Going Abroad (1927)
The Japanese Empire (1927)
East of Siam (1926)
The Fringe of the Moslem World (1928)
I Discover Greece (1929)
A Scandinavian Summer (1930)
Foot-Loose in the British Isles (1932)
Trailing Cortez Through Mexico (1935)
A Vagabond in Sovietland (1935)
Roaming in Hawaii (1937)
Sky Roaming Above Two Continents (1938)
The Lure of Alaska (1939)
The Pan American Highway; From the Rio Grande to the Canal Zone (1940)[8]
Rediscovering South America (1943)
Winter Journey Through the Ninth
The last book is his war “memoirs” from WWII in France (published posthumously) — as a 61 year-old he obtained a commission in the Ninth Army Air Force.
That you'd turn tail and run from your "gaff" so quickly also says something about you, cuck boy.Replies: @Yahya, @songbird, @A123
Histrionic over reaction to simple humor is counterproductive: (1)
SJW’s are grim and lack any sense of humor. You must fit right in with your fellow DNC members.
#LetsGoBrandon 😇
_____________________
(1) https://dailycaller.com/2022/04/09/bill-maher-war-on-jokes-must-end-video-chris-rock-will-smith/
These abstractions can help navigate the world, but they don't exist - and we shouldn't confuse the map for the territory.
You will not find physical objects describing straight lines in the real world - but you can certainly super-impose a conceptual net on the physical world in order to help you navigate it in certain ways.
But on the higher level of understanding and not power, one must realize the conceptual net isn't reality.
If you read the fascinating philosophy of Kant, it becomes clear that a significant portion of our concepts are simply super-imposed on the world and do not describe reality.
Quantum mechanics - in which the law of non contradiction does not hold - similarly shows that out conceptual net is super-imposed on reality.
Concepts are highly useful - but when we lose sight of the larger context that they are just approximate maps, we descend into scientism.
As for pain and death being part of nature, absolutely - however, it is still possible that the greatest flourishing if life is only possible by accepting nature and cooperating with it.
For instance, it's been said that you must lose your life to save it - in other words, being preoccupied with cheating death may cause you to suffer endemic anxiety and lose vitality and engagement with life.
Isn't the devitalized condition of modern man a result of his preoccupation with cheating death?
Similarly, avoiding pain as a priority interferes with many activities that enhance the feeling of aliveness, and interfere with growth that increases life.
Life itself depends on a process of death and renewal - anyone who favors life may well embrace death :)
If you see yourself as part of the larger system of nature, as an expression of it's energies, death isn't extinction but simply a transformation.
You are thinking too much with your left hemisphere :)Replies: @AaronB, @silviosilver
The problem is on the level of first assumptions.
The left hemisphere sees only concrete distinctions, so to the left brain you are a distinct individual with no connection to any larger whole or a larger purpose.
Of course, if that’s your assumption then death will seem like final extinction and pain will see pointless.
However, the nature of the left brain is to have a very narrow focus – so it can’t “zoom out” and see the larger picture. (It’s function is to zoom in – it’s the emissary of the general-master, whose function is to see the larger whole)
It’s stuck.
Problem is, even the logical and analytical side of the left brain can see a serious problem. On the one hand, even logic can tell you that in countless ways humans flourish best when obeying nature and life is promoted following nature’s “laws”.
Yet the left brain view view of concrete distinctions also necessarily creates an inescapable drive to escape nature – “disobey” nature – because it cannot help but see death as extinction and pain as pointless, since we are not connected to any larger whole with a purpose.
So it’s trapped in a paradox that can only be resolved by “widening out” into the larger and more inclusive right hemisphere thinking.
If we fail to do that, we remain trapped in self-defeating paradox, which consistently leads to actions that fail to achieve what we want and undercut our ability to flourish.
We make physical survival a priority – and the result is an epidemic of anxiety and widespread loss of vitality and engagement with life.
But the right hemisphere, which can see the larger picture, can integrate paradox and understand that one ptomotes life and vitality by accepting death.
You probably think that would be great, of course.
Internet wannabe tough guy. Talking about "power is power" as if you have any idea at all about how militaries work. Or how you work. Do you know yourself at all?
And anyway, some Paradox computer game this isn't. Actual individuals live all throughout Russia, and their third world economy is going down and down. This is sad and will result in stunted lives, but not as sad or stunting as the evil they are unleashing in Ukraine. For both them and the Ukrainians. They should take their soldiers home.
Russia built their credibility and prestige on propaganda and a Potemkin military. They were ok to be poor if they could maintain that prestige and pride. But now the devil is coming to collect his due and Putin's pact has doomed them. Pride before reality is the path to hell.
The war gets worse for Russia every single day. I said that it would at the beginning. The Russian army shrinks. Russian equipment is destroyed. Russian morale plummets. Meanwhile, Ukraine only gets stronger. There's nothing Russia can do to get Ukraine to agree to peace, except withdraw. Russia cannot even threaten Kyiv again. They can only defend their skrinking gains, as their army breaks down in the field.
Russians support this, for now, for humans are generally too prideful to admit their errors and grow and change. But the tightening vice of reality will crack their solipsism. It will hurt, but they will at last be free. The only questions are how much it hurts and what they have left when they are freed.
"Power is power" you said, when I told you that Russia was f"cked. You wrote something about "13,000 tanks." But you have been substituting Russian progaganda for your sanity. Like someone who thinks they're a winner because their football team looks promising. Now you must surely know that you have no idea what power actually is. And open your mind a little and reflect on how things are, not how you want them to be.
You do not want to still be cheerleading this catastrophe of cruelty in one month's time. Your own soul is on the line, WokeChoke. Everything you "hate' is also what you are. Only from the position of seeing something in yourself can you truly understand it. And if you don't understand what you "oppose" you will always be wrong and you will always lose.Replies: @sudden death, @Wokechoke
Donetsk was a Potemkin style project. Welsh metallurgist Yuzovsk or Hughsovsk he even built an Anglican Church for his staff. Later era but same principle. Potemkin was a developer. Flunky for a German Tsarina. Moscow might have even been garrisoned by Anglo saxon emigres after 1066. One of Harold’s grandsons via his daughter with Edith.
Remember tat poll a couple of years ago in which 41% of Ukrainians claimed Russians and Ukrainians were one people? AK was fond of citing it.
Exposure to actual Russians has brought that number down significantly. It’s at 8%.

https://ratinggroup.ua/en/research/ukraine/vosmoy_obschenacionalnyy_opros_ukraina_v_usloviyah_voyny_6_aprelya_2022.html
More highlights:
Over the last month, the share of the respondents who believe that restoring friendly relations between Ukrainians and Russians is impossible has increased 1.5 times (from 42% to 64%). 22% of the respondent believe that this might happen no sooner than in 20 to 30 years. About 10% predict such reconciliation in up to 15 years. Even in the southern and eastern regions of Ukraine, more than half of the respondents do not believe in restoring the friendship between the two nations.
The vast majority of the respondents (90%) support the initiative to deprive the pro-Russian Members of Parliament of their mandates. 86% support a total ban on the activities of these MPs in Ukraine.
:::::::::::
Putin has basically killed the Russian idea in Ukraine. Understandable, given that his soldiers have been murdering and raping people, and destroying cities even in what had once been less anti-Russian places such as Kharkiv.
:::::::::::
For those who claim Ukraine has become a wasteland where no one works anymore:
More and more people are resuming their jobs. Currently, 58% of those who had jobs before the war continue to work (this share was 46% in March). In general, 29% work normally, 26% work part-time or remotely, and 3% started at a new job. 41% lost their jobs during the war (53% did in March). Most of those currently employed are in the western oblasts, while only a third of the residents of the East of Ukraine have a job: other two-thirds have lost their jobs.
Talking about slave labor is a real smart way to win sympathy for the side that you favor.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/25/Islam_in_Europe-2010.svg/1024px-Islam_in_Europe-2010.svg.png
Eastern Europe is the last reservoir of pure Europeans, with a largely traditional culture. It ought to be protected. Putin has sent Asian Buryats and Muslim Chechens to brutalize a piece of it.Replies: @songbird, @Wokechoke, @A123, @Dmitry
In this view, the aryan countries of Europe like Sweden, Denmark, Great Britain, Germany, Norway, etc, are not “Europe”, because they became too desirable with immigrants from Islamic countries. Whole world has been trying to immigrate there of course, regardless of their religion.
While in the more failing states, which fewer people have wanted to immigrate to than emigrate from, above all Ukraine, Belarus, Moldova and Romania, should be saying “we are the pure Europeans” with ” our traditional culture” (of bad roads, processed meat, unhygienic hospitals?). Romania, Moldova and Ukraine and Belarus, can be the apex of European civilization?
Apparently, in this view, “pure European” would be synonymous with low trust, low investment, low income, high corruption, unsuccessful industry, lack of technology, GDP per capita lower than Mexico, low cancer survival rates, obsolete military equipment and low-cost architecture.
Prestige of Europe in contemporary world culture, is because of the opposite things – high trust, low corruption, high technology, advanced industry, engineering achievements, intellectual power, scientific revolution, leading edge military technology, high quality automobiles, expensive architecture, excellent healthcare, social safety nets, political freedom, worker bargaining power, etc.
If “pure Europe” moves to the second world, it is internet forum culture reductio ad absurdum. It is like all debates of years past, when you try to argue for Ukraine to Fox News demographics that overestimate risk in London and Sweden for “no-go zones” or dying in Islamic terrorist attacks (statistically most of places are safer than almost any American city if you try to account for different crime reporting standards).
Anyway, there isn’t much need to market Ukraine to few Hillary’s Clinton’s “deplorables” that were lost in quiet internet forums.
Most all the upper class and important people of the developed countries, whether in New York, Sydney or Tokyo, are supporting Kiev/Kyiv. Even Singapore media is disgusted by such a war (https://www.straitstimes.com/opinion/war-in-ukraine-separating-truth-from-falsehood).
If it survives this war, Kiev/Kyiv, will become a fashionable tourist destination, for the hipsters of the world. Young students from Seoul and Tokyo will traveling to Kiev/Kyiv for photos next to abandoned tanks. They will be going for selfies with Ukrainian war veterans.
In the 1820s, Lord Byron has gone from a comfortable palace in England, to support Greece against the Ottoman Empire (https://www.theguardian.com/books/2021/apr/18/revealed-lord-byrons-4000-cheque-that-helped-create-modern-greece). Ukraine is already the contemporary version of those kind of romantic causes but in an epoch of electronic media and international culture.
What would be interesting about it is other things.Replies: @Dmitry
How about the world's leading bioweapons expert Francis Boyle? He is convinced that those WMD bioweapons labs in the Ukraine were actually carrying out bioweapons research aimed at Russia and that all who work in them deserve life in prison. So this is on top of Nuland's confession under oath. I myself do get agitated about this issue like others get agitated about all sorts of other issues because we can all end up being their victims no matter where in the world they may be and therefore I am quite prepared to accept Russian actions, which I would normally consider unacceptable and despicable, against a country hosting these labs, such as the Ukraine. Then on top of those bioweapons WMD labs we have the crimes against humanity by the Azov Nazis and others, the dual national Zionist leader, politicians and oligarchs, talk of developing a nuclear programme and dirty bombs, etc. So the case is closed; no matter how bad the Russians may be the Ukrainians are the greater evil, far greater evil, so I can't feel much sympathy for them when they get whatever they've got coming their way. It's sad and tragic but unavoidable and in the end well deserved.Replies: @AP
He’s a lawyer and not a scientist:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francis_Boyle
Sincere question:
What is your opinion of 9-11? The Q Anon stuff? The Holocaust?
Q-Anon, some truths but gave false hope. Fall of the Cabal video series was great
https://www.fallofthecabaldocumentary.com
Must have been mostly true since it has been banned on you tube and elsewhere. The truth must hurt them.
Holocaust/Holohoax, a bit of both but I tend to trust more the official narrative, though not wholly, than the deniers, although I see some valid points there.Replies: @AP
Can’t trust your knowledge or honesty after you write that “ukrainians’” view of Russians changed after they were exposed to actual Russians. It’s hard to lack exposure to actual Russians when you yourself are, well, a Russian, as many ukrainians are and not just in the southeast, or very close to it in any way that matters.
As you should know, first, ukrainians often ARE Russians. Many others are not much distinguishable from Russians genetically / culturally / linguistically / religiously.
There is not the bright line between Russian and “ukrainian” that you posit, not in terms of genetics, language, culture, or religion. If people are coming to think that there is, it’s a view not supported by the objective facts about those four key components of a person’s or nation’s identity/allegiance/way of life.
It is a MINORITY of residents of the Russian borderland — and very few outside the incongruous western part tacked on by Stalin — who do not speak Russian as a native language.
It is also a MINORITY of residents of the Russian borderland who are genetically substantially different from typical Russians, again mainly in the western oblasty that the Soviet dictator arbitrarily assigned to the ukrainian SSR.
Why is it so important to you that people die to preserve articificial unworkable borders imposed by decree of murderer-tyrants such as Stalin (who added western “ukraine” primarily from Polish and Romanian territory) and Khruschev (who added Crimea)?
Why is it so important to help make one of these close kindred peoples hate the other?
Russia is doing what it needs to do to protect her people on both sides of the absurd Soviet Communist borders. God bless them and reasonable honest people everywhere.
I noticed on these historical disputes that Kursk was part of what was known as Sloboda Ukraine as well. That’s a source of dispute if Kiev was to become land hungry in the future. The Brest Litovsk treaty cut a great deal further into Volga areas than the current map as well.Replies: @AP
The city itself is 25% ethnic Russian.
Before the war people probably figured that Russians weren't so different, they may have had a friend who was Russian or half-Russian, he seemed to be the same. But this changed when wild Russians came into the country and started killing people.
Of course there is no reason why someone who is part Russian wouldn't consider Russians and Ukrainians to be different people. It's as bright as the line between the Dutch and the Germans, and brighter than between the Swedes, Norwegians and Danes. But the divide in political culture is more extreme: Ukraine is politically a European people who want some sort of democracy, Russians want a benevolent Asiatic despot. 1. The parts tacked on by Stalin where most of the population speaks Ukrainian are about 25%-30% of the country (10 million people or so out of 35 million). They are not some odd sliver of land like the Gaelic-speaking parts of Ireland.
2. The number of primarily Ukrainian speakers in the rest of Ukraine is not "very few" but most of the people in countryside. Whatever the rural percentage is, is the Ukrainian-speaking percentage in those regions. I met a guy in Moscow , for example, who spoke decent Ukrainian to me. He had spent his childhood summers with grandparents in a village in Kharkiv oblast.
So overall probably a little over half the country speaks Ukrainian as their primary language (before Crimea and Donbas left it was less than half). Most of the western 25%-30% of the country and about a third or so of the rest of the country.
3. Pretty much everyone is fluent in Ukrainian even if they do not speak it as their primary language with their friends. It's close enough that it is easily learned by Russian-speakers. Ukrainians, Poles, and southern and central Ukrainians are all about the same genetically. But on a more subtle level Russians and Ukrainians can be distinguished for one another and even Ukrainians from Belgorod in Russia are genetically closer to Ukrainians in Lviv than they are to their Russian neighbors (see my other post). Unlike you, most Ukrainians are willing to fight for their country and have proven this. I had posted poll data showing that Ukrainians would fight for heir country before this war started and the Russians who tricked you scoffed at this and insisted the Ukrainians would surrender quickly. They did not. They are fighting to be masters of their homeland. Something you, an American, have failed to do (IIRC you whine about non-whites taking over the USA, yet you have never done anything about it and have even chosen to have non-white kids). Perhaps that's why you dislike the Ukrainians, they highlight your own character flaws of treason, cowardice and failure by your own standards. Ask the Russians. They are the ones who chose to invade Ukraine and murder people. In normal people this creates hatred. Ukrainians didn't hate Russians until Russian intervention created the civil war in 2014 and really started to hate them now when Russia invaded the rest of Ukraine, killing thousands in places like Kharkiv and Kiev two cities that had once been divided but are now united in rage at the common murderous enemy.
In 2013, before Russia intervened in Ukraine, most Ukrainians liked the Russian people. Even most Western Ukrainians.
Ukrainian identity may highly malleable and the post-Soviet borders nonsensical but I don't blame them for wanting to strike off on their given how Russia is governed as of now.
Again, I think a revived union state would have been ideal but unfortunately, it does seem the scale of the 90s collapse devastated too catastrophically the governing competence across not just Russia, but all the countries that were a part of it. Putin screwed up. I wonder if Primakov could have done better.
Wiki: In Wandering in Northern China (1923), he visited Korea, which had been a Japanese colony since 1910. The first thing he noted was that Korea was virtually devoid of trees.[2] The aristocracy had been stripped of their duties but were allowed to wear the unique attire of their rank, although many were living in poverty. Franck reported that the women "displayed to the public gaze exactly that portion of the torso which the women of most nations take pains to conceal."
List of his works:
A Vagabond Journey Around the World (1910)[7]
Four Months Afoot in Spain (1911)
Zone Policeman 88 (1913)
Bussy Destroyer 2000 Machine Shop (1969)
Tramping Through Mexico, Guatemala, and Honduras (1916)
Vagabonding Down the Andes (1917)
Vagabonding Through Changing Germany (1920)
Roaming Through the West Indies (1920)
Working North from Patagonia (1921)
Wandering in Northern China (1923)
Glimpses of Japan and Formosa (1924)
Roving Through Southern China (1925)
All About Going Abroad (1927)
The Japanese Empire (1927)
East of Siam (1926)
The Fringe of the Moslem World (1928)
I Discover Greece (1929)
A Scandinavian Summer (1930)
Foot-Loose in the British Isles (1932)
Trailing Cortez Through Mexico (1935)
A Vagabond in Sovietland (1935)
Roaming in Hawaii (1937)
Sky Roaming Above Two Continents (1938)
The Lure of Alaska (1939)
The Pan American Highway; From the Rio Grande to the Canal Zone (1940)[8]
Rediscovering South America (1943)
Winter Journey Through the Ninth
The last book is his war "memoirs" from WWII in France (published posthumously) -- as a 61 year-old he obtained a commission in the Ninth Army Air Force.Replies: @songbird
I think there was also a real poverty of animals. For example, draft animals. Even back then, their graveyards were exclusively on untillable hills. Many foreigners saw the Japanese presence as necessary, despite its harshness, in order to help develop the country.
I believe this was also true in parts of Japan. (not to mention, famously the Minoans)
If you have never read it, I also highly recommend the book The Royal Road to Romance by Richard Halliburton (esp. to Aaron B, as well). IIRC, he includes a shocking picture of a young Japanese woman, which is all the more curious, and seemingly more authentic, when you realize (not attested in the book) that he was a homosexual.
I would say this is patently false and a rather silly statement. Or, I suppose it works if you strip the word “natural” of any meaning whatsoever by making it an absolute blanket term. I suppose one could also justify any behavior as “good” using a similar framework.
I think it is an arguable point to consider cities unnatural as AaronB as stated and it could be an interesting argument to boot. However, you haven’t done anything but dismiss the point out of hand by setting up an unsupported tautology.
Humans seem to be quite unique among the animals in their capability of innovation and transcending natural boundaries. Synthetic pesticides, space travel, or nuclear weapons are hardly “natural” because they represent a fundamental reordering of matter and reality. This is in contrast to pre-modern innovation that repurposed or optimized natural materials or processes. It’s fine with me if you choose to embrace the un-natural as something good or neutral, by why pretend as though there is no distinction?
Because we were created with a different spiritual make up compared to the other animals. That's also why we have a moral responsibility the other animals don't have.
Halliburton had quite a life. My wife uses the “Book of Marvels” as a supplement for the kids’ home education.
The problem is not suburbia but modernity. Modern cities are no more soulful than modern suburbs. And older suburbs (say, from the 1930s and earlier) are beautiful places in which people live in pretty houses in garden settings. My own is such a place.
This is an old suburb of Dallas:


A more modest one outside Detroit:
I have had very limited contact with wildlife, but to the extent that I have, I think I was less scared or grossed out when I was a kid. For example, I can remember two instances of snakes that slithered past near by without it even raising my heart rate. And for a short time I had this fascination with capturing spiders in jars (I didn't realize you needed to feed them, so they died pretty quickly lol). Nowadays, any snake I spotted in the wild would totally freak me out, and as for spiders, curse the twisted demiurge that created that most vile of species.
Last jump scare I had, there is track by the river near me that I like to go for runs/walks along, often in the dead of night. For a stretch of that track, there are these tall straws between the river and the track, and on a few occasions this small kangaroo, or maybe wallaby (I can't tell the diff), has gone hopping through them as I'm near by. It's happened a few times, and made me jump each time. This is quite close to the city center, not on the fringes of urban settlement, and I never would have thought I'd come across a kanga there.Replies: @songbird
I have seen some strange videos on youtube of Indians dealing with snakes. I don’t know if cobras are as common as garter snakes there, and people are inured to them. Or if it has something to do with vegetarianism – perhaps, the precarious existence of Indian farmers, which has them see rodent-eating snakes as a necessity.
One cobra was caught in a chain link fence, and a guy came and gently worked it out. And another was caught in a ball of fibers and a guy gave it a drink from a sprite bottle, and cut the fibers off. I think I also saw one, where a baby was surrounded by cobras.
But in America, the old timers tell me that they would kill rattlers on sight.
You do realize that Russia is the world’s leading country in terms of bio weapon programs and that anything Ukraine allegedly does was inherited from Soviet times and is a shadow of Russia’s programs (kind of like Ukraine’s string missile programs are junior versions of Russia’s).
By your logic, Russia should also get nuked. And maybe the USA too because you claim that it directs these programs.Replies: @Wokechoke, @Commentator Mike, @Mikhail
An example of Hungary being especially intelligent among EU members:
https://www.rt.com/news/553601-poland-hungary-partners-ukraine/
God, from Hunyadi to Thököly Petöfi to István Tisza to Horthy, why are Hungarians so utterlyshit at diplomacy? To bad reiner tor isn't here anymore too expand on Hungary's unbeaten track record on joining sides just as they start losing.
Imagine Hungary managing to alienate Poland at this time. The only intelligent leader they ever had was Kádár.Replies: @RadicalCenter
Opposing Banderites isn’t Ukrainophobia. Compared to the US actions in Iraq and Afghanistan, the Russian military action in Ukraine is much more looking to not bomb civilians as Bill Arkin, Doug Macgregor and Scott Ritter have noted.
Kiev regime forces have blended in with civilians. Related are the Kiev regime forces using DHL vans and civilian ambulances for transport – the latter instance for transport not involving what ambulances are intended for.
Bundeswehr already tapping out. in only a few weeks of dumping a small amount of inventory into UKR, GER can’t spare anymore. UK also appears to be approaching the limit of the current war specific inventory they can send into UKR.
in a conventional one on one war, 2022 RUS would roll over 2022 GER, or any of the other continental nations. i already knew that, but how quickly the NATO nations that are not the US run out of ammunition would be alarming to their defense ministers, if they actually expected to do much fighting. but they don’t. they expect the US to do most of the fighting. as already revealed when they tried to invade Libya. ran out of ammunition in 2 weeks, let the US do the rest of the work.
2 months later, things remain the same. 3 militaries matter. US, RUS, CHN. if you’re not one of them, then ICBMs are your only option.
I was introduced at an earlier age to The Royal Road of Romance by my mother, as he was one of the idols of her adolescent life. I’m virtually sure she wasn’t aware of the gay aspect, and I think she still mourned his death, which in a way was certainly “romantic” — lost at sea while trying to sail a Chinese junk across the Pacific.
You can mention Azov but on the other had there is Wagner whose leader sports Nazi Tattoos. There is also Rogozin, a Russian government minister and head of their space program. Here he is giving a Nazi salute:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aI0eEH_ZuHE
And the Chechens while not Nazis are no better than them.
More to the point, while the whole post-Soviet space includes Nazis (or pseudo-Nazis) it is the Russian state that behaves as a fascist one, invading neighbors in aggressive expansionist wars and exterminating civilians while doing so. Your past whining about what was being done in Donbas by Kiev has proven to be disingenuous because you complain far less about much worse that is being done in the rest of Ukraine.
You are in very good company with the sex offender Scott Ritter, criminal Bentley and swindler Gonzalo.Replies: @Commentator Mike, @Mikhail
Neo-Nazi is a fair and accurate account, regarding the likes of Azov. Mark Sleboda is someone else for you to hypocritically bash:
Tweets by MarkSleboda1
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francis_Boyle
Sincere question:
What is your opinion of 9-11? The Q Anon stuff? The Holocaust?Replies: @Commentator Mike
9-11, Inside job to blame Arabs and start wars in the Middle East.
Q-Anon, some truths but gave false hope. Fall of the Cabal video series was great
https://www.fallofthecabaldocumentary.com
Must have been mostly true since it has been banned on you tube and elsewhere. The truth must hurt them.
Holocaust/Holohoax, a bit of both but I tend to trust more the official narrative, though not wholly, than the deniers, although I see some valid points there.
But grids like in central San Francisco, Turin (many Italian cities) and Manhattan can be very aesthetically positive.
1. But Paris is full of small streets, not only wide boulevards. There is very active street life in its streets today. It’s just negatively effected by being so much for tourists, as the world’s most popular tourist city. As a result, you feel like it is “not genuine”, as so many shops selling souvenirs for foreign observers.
2. Before automobiles, the center of wide boulevards would have been accessible for pedestrians. So, the oppressive aspect of wide roads, was not created until the 20th century.
Have you seen the film “Playtime” by Tati. He was born 1907 can remember Paris before and after automobiles, and there is the brutal satire (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7bTLoBpw0Eo).
In the 19th century, wide boulevards would reduce density of traffic, and create more space for pedestrians.
Flânerie is a fashion of the late 19th century, at the same time as introduction of wide boulevards. Paris probably became more pedestrian accessible.
The streets become public square of the bourgeoisie. It is converting streets, into the public function of the Mediterranean “Plaza/Piazza “.
Baudelaire write about standing in mud in the boulevard. But generally you can walk in the center with your expensive cloths, bourgeois shoes are not ruined, neither bourgeois women’s dress tails.
It was viewed like an increase in the civic spaces. This is like in Renaissance Italian cities, the public sphere and civic political life was created by the Piazzas. Hausmann’s Paris creates these vast Piazzas in the city.

By middle 20th century, these spaces are closed and crossing the road becomes hazardous. But in the night there is some atmospherical compensation from shining lights of the large glass shop windows.
The automobile was definitely a huge factor in the decline of charm in cities, that really accelerated and cemented all that went before it. I don't give this enormous factor such weight in my comments perhaps because I think it's already so widely appreciated, and represents the "capstone" so to speak of process of sacrificing beauty for efficiency that is one of the major projects of modernity - but I'm interested in tracing all aspects of this process, and especially aspects of the core "cognitive style" that led to this unfortunate development.
You'll note I agree with Thulean Friend every time he criticizes the presence of cars in the city and appreciate his doing so.
Also, I agree that wide and straight streets have a positive contribution to make to urban design provided they are not characteristic of the entire city and limited in scope. Squares and large spaces for public gatherings are very important and beautiful - what I object to more is the monotony and predictability of the "straight line" when that behind to characterize the entire city.
I am a great fan of Flanerie :)
And yes, I absolutely concede that grid like pattern is not an insuperable barrier to beauty and charm, a sense of liveliness and creative disorder (or a non-logical order), if countervailing factors are present in sufficient force.
All this being said Dmitry, I cannot but insist that something extremely important has been lost when a city has entirely transitioned away from winding medieval streets that are mysterious and do not follow strict geometric patterns and straight lines.
This kind of urban landscape corresponds to an extremely important part of our own minds, the part that appreciates mystery and the vague and indistinct, to intuition and emotion, to creativity and to a sense of the larger whole, to adventure and discovery instead of predictability and control and practicality.
In The Master and His Emissary, there is a section discussing the emergence of grid-like urban patterns in ancient Rome and how that was associated with a loss of creativity and intuition, and ultimately sterility and decadence.
It's significant that beginning in the 18th century, the modern world has begun making the same transition to an urban landscape of predictable and controllable straight lines, reflecting a similar shift in cognitive style.
And is it surprising we are now experiencing a loss of creativity and intuition and emotion, and the entering our own period of sterility and decline?
it’s interesting how ‘war crimes’ in ukraine are approaching ‘election errors’ in US elections, in how the direction of the errors is 99% in one direction.
in US elections, almost every error, screw up, mistake, undercount, overcount, delay, new law, court decision, recount, seems to go the Democrats way. if this stuff were mostly random, you’d expect a more spread out distribution of outcomes.
civilians getting killed in ukraine looks about the same. starting to see that RUS exercised extreme restraint in not going into ukraine years sooner. my question is why does Russia want to negotiate anything with the puppet government? everything is a lie, nothing they say is what they will do, they kill random innocent ukrainian citizens at will, they hide behind hospitals and nuclear power plants, they plunder the country, they keep all domestic political opponents out, they censor everything, they would be glad to start a global war over their backwater country. they are pure, pure scum of the highest order.
I don't think that American money was always ugly, but it seems to have gotten uglier on a continuing trajectory.Replies: @Barbarossa
I’ve mentioned it before, but early 20th century American coinage is very beautiful. It completely went to hell after WW2 and now has embraced these endless and ugly novelty series. Although, in a surprising twist, the bust of Washington has actually been rejiggered to be more sculptural and attractive, reminiscent of older coinage which is not surprising since it is a design from the 30’s.
http://www.tbnumismatics.com/mistaken-misogyny-andrew-mellon-laura-fraser--the-george-washington-portraiture.html
There may be a “woke” angle to changing the portrait of Washington right now, but the update is by far the superior design so it may be a case of the right choice for the wrong reasons.
I think the change in American coinage in the middle and second half of the 20th century is symbolic of the death of America the nation and the ascendance of America the Empire. The designs went from various symbolic depictions of Liberty to the bland visages of dead leaders.
As you say, it parallels the differences between Greek and Roman coinage.
The idea of a Lincoln penny was pushed based on the 100th anniversary of his birthday. It had already become a holiday at that point, at least in some places. And it gets worse, black history month is based on blacks celebrating Lincoln's birthday.
It's interesting to think of American Empire. On the map, the US gave up the Philippines, but, if you counted troops abroad, or dollars abroad, then I suppose it was radical growth of empire.
I blame some of the ugliness in coins on the fact that people were coming off the farms, hence the end of the wheat penny. But that's probably not right as the redesign decisions were made by only a few men.
The comparison with Rome is apt as a lot of people think America transitioned from a republic to an empire during the American Civil War. Abraham Lincoln was it's Julius Caesar and John Wilkes Booth it's Brutus. The United States even had it's own Varus ['Give me back my three Legions!]. See comment link below under 'More' for who the American Varus was.
Point by point the close parallels between the history of ancient Rome and America's own history are downright bizarre at times.
https://www.unz.com/pescobar/do-you-want-a-war-between-russia-and-nato/#comment-5172335
#LetsGoBrandon 😇
_____________________
(1) https://dailycaller.com/2022/04/09/bill-maher-war-on-jokes-must-end-video-chris-rock-will-smith/Replies: @silviosilver
But I didn’t “overreact” to it, moron. I actually find it funny. I find even it even funnier to watch you recoil from its implicit racial point.
What specifically didn't you like about “The Matter With Things” so far?Replies: @silviosilver
Actually, there was one specific thing: his innuendo about us “destroying the world.” That sort of thing comes up so often nowadays that my eyes just glide over it, or if I hear it, I just tune it out, which I suppose is why I didn’t immediately think of it when you asked me. Language like that is how greenies usually smuggle in their environmentalist values before going on to insist that, you see, we simply must change our wicked ways, and here’s what we need to do…blah blah blah. I’m not accusing McGilchrist of such motives, but I think it was this more than anything else that triggered the sinking feeling I had. Waaaay too early to judge the entire book just yet, of course. I’ll update you on my assessment when we next convene. 🙂
Kiev regime forces have blended in with civilians. Related are the Kiev regime forces using DHL vans and civilian ambulances for transport - the latter instance for transport not involving what ambulances are intended for.Replies: @Mr. Hack
Perhaps not, but too many Russians, including Putler, like to label any Ukrainians who are the least bit (or more) patriotic as being “Banderites” or “Nazis”. Face it, Putler doesn’t like Ukrainians nor Ukraine, and would prefer to do away with the whole “problem” and turn Ukrainians back into docile boot licking Little Russians, totally enamored with the supposed higher culture and language of the Great Russians. Since you seem to fit the mold to a tee, I’ve always wondered why you’ve never learned to master the Russian language? Too difficult for you, or are you just comfortable playing Kremlin Stooge far away in New York?
People vote with their feet, including inhabitants of “pure Europe”. It’s delightfully ironic that AP waxes lyrically about the necessity of racial homogenity, while sitting in the superdiverse (and supersuccessful) United States of America.
Unlike places in Europe (or Africa), America is not an ethnic homeland but an idea (a European one) that anyone can participate in.Replies: @Wokechoke, @silviosilver
The incredibly strong, near mandatory, Christian culture in the U.S. provided stability for all communities. Even poor communities, with ancestors who were involuntary transportees, were orderly and safe. Children were born to wed parents, a mother & a father.
SJW Islam, with co conspirators in the Leftoid courts, undermined shared U.S. values and drove Christianity from schools and the public square. Fewer and less stable marriages left more kids without two parents, which is especially harmful for boys without fathers.
____
I live in the U.S. South and know black parents with kids and grand kids. They know more about AR-15 pattern rifles than I do, are better shots, and faithfully follow all safety and usage requirements for dangerous tools. Ammo is tightly controlled to avoid the 300BLK danger (see [MORE]).
The problems in Chiraq are not directly tied to race or the number of firearms. It is driven by the lack of Christian values and further complicated by lucrative street trade in illegal drugs and other vices. Rap culture turned gangsters into folk heroes.
PEACE 😇
I may have shared this some months ago. 300BLK CA chamber and fire in a 5.56 NATO rifle. Very dangerous.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RbfIkaNlECoReplies: @Wokechoke
https://i.imgur.com/vv2L69q.jpg Postsoviet space is just different region than the USA, with not quite analogous problems.Replies: @Wokechoke
Q-Anon, some truths but gave false hope. Fall of the Cabal video series was great
https://www.fallofthecabaldocumentary.com
Must have been mostly true since it has been banned on you tube and elsewhere. The truth must hurt them.
Holocaust/Holohoax, a bit of both but I tend to trust more the official narrative, though not wholly, than the deniers, although I see some valid points there.Replies: @AP
As predicted, thank you for the honesty.
I value diversity, I think it would be sad if there were no Sweden, no Ukraine, no Nigeria, etc. but one giant mass of light brown people spanning the globe.
Unlike places in Europe (or Africa), America is not an ethnic homeland but an idea (a European one) that anyone can participate in.
The proposition nation is Sui Generis. This might work for the US but it isn’t the EU concept nor is the US a normal nation state. Not that there is anything wrong with the constitution and bill of rights. Many of the actors in the foreign service have roots in the nations they are stationed in (Nuland for example has roots in Moldavia and Ukraine) and have historical axes to grind using the machine they control to settle specific grudges.
These abstractions can help navigate the world, but they don't exist - and we shouldn't confuse the map for the territory.
You will not find physical objects describing straight lines in the real world - but you can certainly super-impose a conceptual net on the physical world in order to help you navigate it in certain ways.
But on the higher level of understanding and not power, one must realize the conceptual net isn't reality.
If you read the fascinating philosophy of Kant, it becomes clear that a significant portion of our concepts are simply super-imposed on the world and do not describe reality.
Quantum mechanics - in which the law of non contradiction does not hold - similarly shows that out conceptual net is super-imposed on reality.
Concepts are highly useful - but when we lose sight of the larger context that they are just approximate maps, we descend into scientism.
As for pain and death being part of nature, absolutely - however, it is still possible that the greatest flourishing if life is only possible by accepting nature and cooperating with it.
For instance, it's been said that you must lose your life to save it - in other words, being preoccupied with cheating death may cause you to suffer endemic anxiety and lose vitality and engagement with life.
Isn't the devitalized condition of modern man a result of his preoccupation with cheating death?
Similarly, avoiding pain as a priority interferes with many activities that enhance the feeling of aliveness, and interfere with growth that increases life.
Life itself depends on a process of death and renewal - anyone who favors life may well embrace death :)
If you see yourself as part of the larger system of nature, as an expression of it's energies, death isn't extinction but simply a transformation.
You are thinking too much with your left hemisphere :)Replies: @AaronB, @silviosilver
I don’t see how a monist like you can get away with forming a distinction between objects that exist in nature and objects that exist only in our minds. From your perspective, shouldn’t they both be equally part of nature?
I guess this is where you play the get-out-of-jail-free card of abandoning non-contradiction. 🙂
How exactly dismissing a concept like spatial points helps one to better appreciate reality is beyond me. Even if you want to use a word like “illusion” to describe them, there’s a clear difference between the “illusion” of spatial points, which we can apply to the physical world and use them to aid us in getting to where we want to go and finding things in places where people assure us they are located – nowadays with uncanny accuracy – and the illusion of a mirage in the desert, which is completely unreliable.
Valuing nature is highly useful – but when we lose sight of the larger context that nature is both friend and foe, we descend into naturism.
Alternatively, the urgency you feel may cause you to do something about it – and, miracle of miracles, perhaps even prevail – rather than timidly surrender to its inevitability.
Nothing easier than to tar someone as being “preoccupied” or “obsessed” with something. You simply set the tripwire at the mere mention of a thing. You mentioned black crime? Oh you’re “obsessed” with it. You want to talk about prolonging life (beyond the span miserly nature has seen fit to extend)? You’re preoccupied with it. Easy peasy.
I'm a non-dualist, which means multiplicity is very real but everything is deeply connected in a higher unity.
With regard to spatial points, it's a question of what "level" you are trying to understand reality on - on the level of utility and power, it's very useful.
On the level of metaphysics, it's not very useful. When trying to understand the nature of the universe (and man's place in it), concepts that work on the level of utility are highly misleading.
Modernity can be said to be the confusion of levels - or rather, the forgetting that the conceptual net we use to navigate the world, does not help us understand it.
To gain power, we must sacrifice understanding. That is fine so long as we remember this - disastrous when we forget this.
To make this all concrete and relevant, the concept of the "point" creates something completely independent from everything else that doesn't actually exist.
If we apply this to the ultimate nature of the universe, we create a world of independent "things", which leads to modern alienation, fear of death, and division and strife - and all based on mistaking an abstraction for reality!
Thing about the title "The Matter With Things" :)
An illusion in the desert, is simply an illusion that isn't useful even on the level of utility.
As for avoiding death - of course we can take action to avoid death and of course we can succeed in doing so :) I take all sorts of actions to avoid death and pain, but I also ultimately embrace and accept both and integrate them into a larger vision.
When this becomes toxic and self-defeating, is when there is complete denial of death and avoiding pain becomes the primary priority, eclipsing all else.
That is when the very thing we are seeking by doing so - life and vitality - gets lost in anxiety and disengagement.Replies: @Beckow
Above. I’m not opposed to the idea, but I’ve tended to see the Scandinavian area as the reserve pool.
drones haven’t been a big factor for UKR. has there been an offensive drone strike in weeks? i think RUS has destroyed 100% of UKR offensive drones. UKR is reduced to using small cheap commercial drones for recon or spotting artillery. not that drones can’t be a big factor in war now, but they weren’t for UKR. 100% for sure a bad internet take forming right now is that drones = tanks obsolete. RUS armor is rolling, UKR armor is getting destroyed and running out of fuel. RUS drones are flying over ukraine skies, that’s what’s actually happening. UKR drones are mostly gone from ukraine skies.
the internet guys repeating the drone thing are the casual interest guys who aren’t following what’s going on day by day. they like Hot Takes and high twitter traffic for their Hot Takes. we aren’t into a ‘missile volleys make aircraft carriers obsolete’ situation here. maybe things could get there with another decade of drone tech, but not so far. drones are slow and detectable and shootable, unlike missile volleys. countermeasures are more effective against them than missile volleys of death or hypersonic missiles.
more important to discuss are ground robots, and how the stuff that Boston Dynamics makes would probably be very effective in MOUT, which UKR seems determined to turn the entire war into. but nobody has robot fleets for MOUT. DARPA initiatives have mostly not gone anywhere.
The enemy includes a lot of us.
Propaganda. Denazification will take care of it. Like the Chechens they will learn to love their mother Russia.
Unlike places in Europe (or Africa), America is not an ethnic homeland but an idea (a European one) that anyone can participate in.Replies: @Wokechoke, @silviosilver
This is why anyone in Europe ought to be sceptical of the American government’s motives in Ukraine.
The proposition nation is Sui Generis. This might work for the US but it isn’t the EU concept nor is the US a normal nation state. Not that there is anything wrong with the constitution and bill of rights. Many of the actors in the foreign service have roots in the nations they are stationed in (Nuland for example has roots in Moldavia and Ukraine) and have historical axes to grind using the machine they control to settle specific grudges.
It’s funny you call Russians rapists, when your fellow Azovites sodomized a 10 year old girl to death then burned a swastika into her body. She was Russian, so it won’t count.
The genetics that the Ukrainians and Russians share is a matter of fact on cline maps. They share an alphabet and orthodoxy in the cultural sphere. Much of the history is shared. Brezhnev was a Ukrainian and Kruschev appears to have come from Sloboda Ukraine which historically included Kursk. The only area I’d say the genetics can be easily distinguished are the Finn/Russ areas around the Kola peninsular, Karelia and Novgorod area where Russians are Scandinavian/Slav.
I noticed on these historical disputes that Kursk was part of what was known as Sloboda Ukraine as well. That’s a source of dispute if Kiev was to become land hungry in the future. The Brest Litovsk treaty cut a great deal further into Volga areas than the current map as well.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.3103/S0095452715040106
"…A detailed analysis of highly informative Y chromosome markers showed that both nations retain the ethnic specificity of their gene pools after 3.5 centuries of coexistence in the same historical territory: the Ukrainian populations are similar to the rest of Ukraine, and Russian populations gravitate towards the south of European Russia."
https://i.imgur.com/ETnKYkI.jpeg
To be sure, the two peoples are very similar genetically (and Poles are similar to them also). But they can be subtly distinguished. No, he was a Russian. There was one document listing him as Ukrainian, others as Russian but both his parents had Russian rather than Ukrainian surnames.
Khrushchev was also Russian.
Gorbachev and Chernenko were half Ukrainian (Chernenko's father was born in Siberia to Ukrainian settlers); those were the only Soviet rulers of Ukrainian descent.Replies: @Wokechoke, @Indifferent Contrarian, @Thulean Friend
Historically, immigration to the U.S. was not impaired by safety nets and other screwed up Leftoid policies. Those who came voluntarily were “The Best” that Europe, Asia, and the other Americas had to offer. On average they were high resilience & high achieving versus those they left behind.
The incredibly strong, near mandatory, Christian culture in the U.S. provided stability for all communities. Even poor communities, with ancestors who were involuntary transportees, were orderly and safe. Children were born to wed parents, a mother & a father.
SJW Islam, with co conspirators in the Leftoid courts, undermined shared U.S. values and drove Christianity from schools and the public square. Fewer and less stable marriages left more kids without two parents, which is especially harmful for boys without fathers.
____
I live in the U.S. South and know black parents with kids and grand kids. They know more about AR-15 pattern rifles than I do, are better shots, and faithfully follow all safety and usage requirements for dangerous tools. Ammo is tightly controlled to avoid the 300BLK danger (see [MORE]).
The problems in Chiraq are not directly tied to race or the number of firearms. It is driven by the lack of Christian values and further complicated by lucrative street trade in illegal drugs and other vices. Rap culture turned gangsters into folk heroes.
PEACE 😇
I may have shared this some months ago. 300BLK CA chamber and fire in a 5.56 NATO rifle. Very dangerous.
The sociology of that needs some explaining. Are they also obese? I’ll take your word for it but these are things that should not be mixed.Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
I guess this is where you play the get-out-of-jail-free card of abandoning non-contradiction. :)
How exactly dismissing a concept like spatial points helps one to better appreciate reality is beyond me. Even if you want to use a word like "illusion" to describe them, there's a clear difference between the "illusion" of spatial points, which we can apply to the physical world and use them to aid us in getting to where we want to go and finding things in places where people assure us they are located - nowadays with uncanny accuracy - and the illusion of a mirage in the desert, which is completely unreliable. Valuing nature is highly useful - but when we lose sight of the larger context that nature is both friend and foe, we descend into naturism. Alternatively, the urgency you feel may cause you to do something about it - and, miracle of miracles, perhaps even prevail - rather than timidly surrender to its inevitability.
Nothing easier than to tar someone as being "preoccupied" or "obsessed" with something. You simply set the tripwire at the mere mention of a thing. You mentioned black crime? Oh you're "obsessed" with it. You want to talk about prolonging life (beyond the span miserly nature has seen fit to extend)? You're preoccupied with it. Easy peasy.Replies: @AaronB
I’m not a monist, at least insofar as I understand monism to be the obliteration of differences, the reduction of multiplicity to sameness.
I’m a non-dualist, which means multiplicity is very real but everything is deeply connected in a higher unity.
With regard to spatial points, it’s a question of what “level” you are trying to understand reality on – on the level of utility and power, it’s very useful.
On the level of metaphysics, it’s not very useful. When trying to understand the nature of the universe (and man’s place in it), concepts that work on the level of utility are highly misleading.
Modernity can be said to be the confusion of levels – or rather, the forgetting that the conceptual net we use to navigate the world, does not help us understand it.
To gain power, we must sacrifice understanding. That is fine so long as we remember this – disastrous when we forget this.
To make this all concrete and relevant, the concept of the “point” creates something completely independent from everything else that doesn’t actually exist.
If we apply this to the ultimate nature of the universe, we create a world of independent “things”, which leads to modern alienation, fear of death, and division and strife – and all based on mistaking an abstraction for reality!
Thing about the title “The Matter With Things” 🙂
An illusion in the desert, is simply an illusion that isn’t useful even on the level of utility.
As for avoiding death – of course we can take action to avoid death and of course we can succeed in doing so 🙂 I take all sorts of actions to avoid death and pain, but I also ultimately embrace and accept both and integrate them into a larger vision.
When this becomes toxic and self-defeating, is when there is complete denial of death and avoiding pain becomes the primary priority, eclipsing all else.
That is when the very thing we are seeking by doing so – life and vitality – gets lost in anxiety and disengagement.
the internet guys repeating the drone thing are the casual interest guys who aren't following what's going on day by day. they like Hot Takes and high twitter traffic for their Hot Takes. we aren't into a 'missile volleys make aircraft carriers obsolete' situation here. maybe things could get there with another decade of drone tech, but not so far. drones are slow and detectable and shootable, unlike missile volleys. countermeasures are more effective against them than missile volleys of death or hypersonic missiles.
more important to discuss are ground robots, and how the stuff that Boston Dynamics makes would probably be very effective in MOUT, which UKR seems determined to turn the entire war into. but nobody has robot fleets for MOUT. DARPA initiatives have mostly not gone anywhere.Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
They are a gold mine for defense appropriations programs and the human benefactors. And if you have an S&P 500 Index fund they are a chunk of that too.
The enemy includes a lot of us.
To return to Descartes again –
For Descartes, mind and matter were two kinds of “substances” – he defined substances as what exists independently, on it’s own.
In this way, Cartesian “dualism” created a radical breach between mind and matter, human and nature. Matter was henceforth “dead”, and mind and matter no longer two aspects of a single thing.
Here is Thomas Berry on the radically destructive consequences of Cartesian dualism –
I think he is just arguing for the purpose of arguing, as there is rhetorical opportunity on this parameter.
If Ukraine was a wealthy country like Norway, it would be destination country for immigration, rather than source country for emigration. Ukrainians would have to be debating all the immigrant problems, as the rest of the wealthy countries. “First world problems” include having too many immigrants, and problems of filtering them.
But if Ukraine was a large version of Norway, there would horn of plenty in terms of reasons available to promote Ukraine, and it would be leading all kinds of indexes you could boast about. But Ukraine is a poor country, and source country for emigration, that very few people want to immigrate to.
So, there is argumentative opportunity for such internet forum, to promote Ukraine for its lack of immigrants and lack of shared problems with the West (e.g. one of the main problems in the West, is immigration of Islamist terrorists).
Fox News watching demographics, with their own opposition to immigration, based in American partisan politics, could view Ukraine positively for its lack of immigration.
It would be sophistic persuasion though, as the lack of immigration in Ukraine, Moldova, Belarus, Romania, or Ethiopia, compared to wealthy countries, is just effect of the low income. It’s like boasting about your lack of divorces, after being rejected for marriage by everyone.
Also it feels like phantom limb syndrome from pre-war times when Ukraine doesn’t have many friends and Ukrainian supporters could feel some pressure to persuade random people by converting effects of its problems into apparent virtues.
But for the last six weeks, all the first world countries, or at least their elite, are supporting Ukraine. Most of the public of the first world supports Ukraine. Everyone is donating money to the Ukrainian military or to help Ukrainian refugee. Ukraine at war, became the romantic and humanitarian cause of the 21st century.
He is from New England, where the proportion of white Americans is 80% (for comparison, United Kingdom’s population is 87% white people, but USA’s population is only 61% white people).
In New England, race is very connected to class, crime levels, and white Americans include prestigious ruling class demographics, with protestant work ethic, high education levels, elite economic status etc. If you raise New England to 100% WASPs, perhaps crime rates might fall to Switzerland levels, but there would be few workers happy to clean to the toilets.
Obviously, the New England situation, is not very generalizing too much to the postsoviet space, where every nationality is equally low in terms of (lack of) value of human life given by the elite. Slavic nationalities are only slightly less “unprestigious” than some of the other ones, but this doesn’t translate into many benefits in the real world. As a posted last thread, even most of the civilian deaths in the Chechen Wars were slavic civilians.
Your city’s most dangerous gangsters can look not like Tupac. (Photo of public meeting of powerful gangsters in Russia)
Postsoviet space is just different region than the USA, with not quite analogous problems.
No matter, the Koudlam score and video is fascinating.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nFWgiZxnz7oReplies: @Dmitry
To your playing svido in the US southwest. “Being patriotic” as in anti-Russian will face understandable opposition among pro-Russian folks.
Putin and post-Soviet Russia en masse readily accepted a neutral Ukraine, with the neocons, neolibs and svidos doing otherwise. You’ll be more knowledgeable with a better grasp of the overall situation.
The incredibly strong, near mandatory, Christian culture in the U.S. provided stability for all communities. Even poor communities, with ancestors who were involuntary transportees, were orderly and safe. Children were born to wed parents, a mother & a father.
SJW Islam, with co conspirators in the Leftoid courts, undermined shared U.S. values and drove Christianity from schools and the public square. Fewer and less stable marriages left more kids without two parents, which is especially harmful for boys without fathers.
____
I live in the U.S. South and know black parents with kids and grand kids. They know more about AR-15 pattern rifles than I do, are better shots, and faithfully follow all safety and usage requirements for dangerous tools. Ammo is tightly controlled to avoid the 300BLK danger (see [MORE]).
The problems in Chiraq are not directly tied to race or the number of firearms. It is driven by the lack of Christian values and further complicated by lucrative street trade in illegal drugs and other vices. Rap culture turned gangsters into folk heroes.
PEACE 😇
I may have shared this some months ago. 300BLK CA chamber and fire in a 5.56 NATO rifle. Very dangerous.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RbfIkaNlECoReplies: @Wokechoke
Really, well behaved Christian southern black folks with AR15 arsenals? Okeydoke.
The sociology of that needs some explaining. Are they also obese? I’ll take your word for it but these are things that should not be mixed.
Was/is it supersuccesful, because it was/is super diverse? If you listen folks here, the main lamentation seems to be about reduction of sucess as diversity is increasing. Including yourself, IIRC, as you also had quite negative impressions about 3rd world style cargo train lootings in California.
Unlike places in Europe (or Africa), America is not an ethnic homeland but an idea (a European one) that anyone can participate in.Replies: @Wokechoke, @silviosilver
Full of racial bullshit, as always. The founding Americans were quite clear about America being a white man’s country, an attitude which prevailed until about 50 years ago. Since then, it’s certainly become a racial free for all – to the severe detriment of the white populace. I guess if America can become something it was never intended to be, no reason Ukraine can’t some day become a “land of immigrants” too. I really hate the idea of “negrify thy neighbor” – a game we will all lose – but when you encounter a shameless shit talker like AP, it’s hard to resist wishing the worst upon what he holds most dear (ie Ukraine, certainly not America).
Africans and Indians are simply a WEAPON you whites use to break and bludgeon other societies into submission. (and societies are an extremely fragile+ delicate thing)
And those 2 are favorite weapon at that(look at Burma even now the US State Department has called it a "Myanmar genocide", right now as i speak Indian invaders aka Rohingya that were imported by the Anglos in the past are being weaponized against the natives of Myanmar and are used to destroy it).And lot can be said about Ukraine but you are the superspreaders of it...this...should I say this.. "malady", it all emanates from the West...the source of poison.
So maybe start changing your laws and people first then? Go after academia, DC state ghouls, and those 'professors" that are creating the little monsters ?The US is already what you would describe as "SJW" since the 60's cultural revolution, and either you scrap America's creed and try something else?(what you should try im not sure). But you guys will continue to carry out your insane mission until the end to save face. To give up on it means to give up on America and everything liberalism stands for, it will mean that it has failed..,Even now with this post you were trying to make whites out of Europeans. wit this "white solidarity" and ideas. A le 56% mutt that doesn’t have any ties with his home country and normal Europeans.Proves time and time again that Whites are some of the greatest enemies of the Europeans. And this isnt some lost rare hidden esoteric lore, this is something even 15 year old Finnish RW' a understand that whites are an enemy.We smaller guys need to be extra careful...a lot of whites look just like us...but instead they will gut you and wear your culture and everything you hold dear like a skinsuit...Replies: @silviosilver
https://i.imgur.com/vv2L69q.jpg Postsoviet space is just different region than the USA, with not quite analogous problems.Replies: @Wokechoke
Cyprien Galliard did a video called See You All showing a battle between Ukraine or Russian soccer hooligans.
Several bridge battles with severe injuries. Comments underneath indicate it’s a Moscow St Petersburg battle but I had been under the impression this housing area was in Ukraine.
No matter, the Koudlam score and video is fascinating.
In the 19th century, wide boulevards would reduce density of traffic, and create more space for pedestrians. Flânerie is a fashion of the late 19th century, at the same time as introduction of wide boulevards. Paris probably became more pedestrian accessible. The streets become public square of the bourgeoisie. It is converting streets, into the public function of the Mediterranean "Plaza/Piazza ". Baudelaire write about standing in mud in the boulevard. But generally you can walk in the center with your expensive cloths, bourgeois shoes are not ruined, neither bourgeois women's dress tails. It was viewed like an increase in the civic spaces. This is like in Renaissance Italian cities, the public sphere and civic political life was created by the Piazzas. Hausmann's Paris creates these vast Piazzas in the city. https://i.imgur.com/Zgn7bi1.jpg By middle 20th century, these spaces are closed and crossing the road becomes hazardous. But in the night there is some atmospherical compensation from shining lights of the large glass shop windows. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=icJw9HXXoXAReplies: @AaronB
You make some good points that should be integrated into the larger picture to make it more comprehensive.
The automobile was definitely a huge factor in the decline of charm in cities, that really accelerated and cemented all that went before it. I don’t give this enormous factor such weight in my comments perhaps because I think it’s already so widely appreciated, and represents the “capstone” so to speak of process of sacrificing beauty for efficiency that is one of the major projects of modernity – but I’m interested in tracing all aspects of this process, and especially aspects of the core “cognitive style” that led to this unfortunate development.
You’ll note I agree with Thulean Friend every time he criticizes the presence of cars in the city and appreciate his doing so.
Also, I agree that wide and straight streets have a positive contribution to make to urban design provided they are not characteristic of the entire city and limited in scope. Squares and large spaces for public gatherings are very important and beautiful – what I object to more is the monotony and predictability of the “straight line” when that behind to characterize the entire city.
I am a great fan of Flanerie 🙂
And yes, I absolutely concede that grid like pattern is not an insuperable barrier to beauty and charm, a sense of liveliness and creative disorder (or a non-logical order), if countervailing factors are present in sufficient force.
All this being said Dmitry, I cannot but insist that something extremely important has been lost when a city has entirely transitioned away from winding medieval streets that are mysterious and do not follow strict geometric patterns and straight lines.
This kind of urban landscape corresponds to an extremely important part of our own minds, the part that appreciates mystery and the vague and indistinct, to intuition and emotion, to creativity and to a sense of the larger whole, to adventure and discovery instead of predictability and control and practicality.
In The Master and His Emissary, there is a section discussing the emergence of grid-like urban patterns in ancient Rome and how that was associated with a loss of creativity and intuition, and ultimately sterility and decadence.
It’s significant that beginning in the 18th century, the modern world has begun making the same transition to an urban landscape of predictable and controllable straight lines, reflecting a similar shift in cognitive style.
And is it surprising we are now experiencing a loss of creativity and intuition and emotion, and the entering our own period of sterility and decline?
This is the thing. The US was quite clearly a white supremacist state from the start. Intended in several respects as a white nationalist project until after the civil war when it gave citizenship to former slaves. Even unionists were thinking they were fighting to limit the spread of black populations. White English with guns settling river estuaries pushing in against Indians, in some areas killing off French and other settlers like the Spanish. Then using black Labor to cultivate tropical areas. Once the Revolution came white identity was actually enshrined in the constitution, Declaration of Independence (bitching about the king being fair to Injuns and potentially arming blacks) and to some extent even the bill of rights. Until the 1960s the society wasn’t integrated at all racially. Proposition only come into being as the US has visibly stumbled in several wars and is in relative though not absolute decline.
The proposition nation is a very recent idea.
Your own prefered version of racism seems to be directed mostly against blacks, as there is no objection against whites (often with non white help) invading and killing other whites? btw, RF is way more multiracial country than UA:
This is true.
But on another thread under a different handle you’ll be telling these Mongolians to have a revolt and break away from Moscow and kill whitey in the Altai mountains and around Vladivostok. Because that’s your pay grade.
Yes, Vlad is using the descendants of Ghengis in Ukraine. It’s awkward for any white racialist who is suspicious of NATO aims to diversify the Ukraine. Never the less these Horde Riders do less long term damage than Negrification does long term.
Their presence in Ukraine is not welcome for several extra reasons.
I see what AP meant in his post though, because he mentioned pure Europeans and traditional European culture, which may not refer to things that are attractive or seen as high status by people today. For example, Europe in 1930 was more pure and truer to its traditions than it is now, but by every measure it is not somewhere people from the present would want to emigrate to for the standard of living.
What would be interesting about it is other things.
I noticed on these historical disputes that Kursk was part of what was known as Sloboda Ukraine as well. That’s a source of dispute if Kiev was to become land hungry in the future. The Brest Litovsk treaty cut a great deal further into Volga areas than the current map as well.Replies: @AP
Actually and interestingly, there are subtle but measurable genetic differences between Ukrainians and Russians. Villagers from ethnic Ukrainian villages in Belgorod region in Russia are closer genetically to Ukrainians in Lviv than they are to Russian villagers nearby:
https://link.springer.com/article/10.3103/S0095452715040106
“…A detailed analysis of highly informative Y chromosome markers showed that both nations retain the ethnic specificity of their gene pools after 3.5 centuries of coexistence in the same historical territory: the Ukrainian populations are similar to the rest of Ukraine, and Russian populations gravitate towards the south of European Russia.”
To be sure, the two peoples are very similar genetically (and Poles are similar to them also). But they can be subtly distinguished.
No, he was a Russian. There was one document listing him as Ukrainian, others as Russian but both his parents had Russian rather than Ukrainian surnames.
Khrushchev was also Russian.
Gorbachev and Chernenko were half Ukrainian (Chernenko’s father was born in Siberia to Ukrainian settlers); those were the only Soviet rulers of Ukrainian descent.
https://twitter.com/Qafzeh/status/655522020671680512/photo/1
So Finns form a part of both Russian as well as Ukrainian ancestry.
The Asian-horde plot thickens 😁Replies: @AP
UA vs. RF is not a racial conflict in my interpretation – it is war of independence when a former metropoly tries to subjugate former breakaway colony, like GB was doing in 1776 and 1812 vs. USA.
Also monarchy of France in 1776 was helping US democratic republic against another monarchy, but USA later did not become a monarchy because of that.
Multiracial USA helping UA against another multiracial RF, does not neccesarily mean UA will become more black, especially as it is country in a long war or near war state for the future, so even Africans will be avoiding it as preferable destination as there would be no handouts.
Also your post seems like indirect confession of having several different and paid handles 😉
The hypothetical doesn’t match. They share a long land border with no obvious geographical or linguistic or genetic division. It’s bizarre.
The Ukraine v Russia business looks more like proxy war to me. Im not claiming the Russians and Ukies are the same people.
I noticed Trofim Lysenko was a Ukie. Lysenko is a Ukrainian a Soviet concept.Replies: @sudden death
https://link.springer.com/article/10.3103/S0095452715040106
"…A detailed analysis of highly informative Y chromosome markers showed that both nations retain the ethnic specificity of their gene pools after 3.5 centuries of coexistence in the same historical territory: the Ukrainian populations are similar to the rest of Ukraine, and Russian populations gravitate towards the south of European Russia."
https://i.imgur.com/ETnKYkI.jpeg
To be sure, the two peoples are very similar genetically (and Poles are similar to them also). But they can be subtly distinguished. No, he was a Russian. There was one document listing him as Ukrainian, others as Russian but both his parents had Russian rather than Ukrainian surnames.
Khrushchev was also Russian.
Gorbachev and Chernenko were half Ukrainian (Chernenko's father was born in Siberia to Ukrainian settlers); those were the only Soviet rulers of Ukrainian descent.Replies: @Wokechoke, @Indifferent Contrarian, @Thulean Friend
He was born on the Dneiper in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kamianske. At a certain point I guess you could say he was born in the Imperial Russian Czardom. But, yeah would be interesting to exhume the bones and do some DNA tests to see exactly what he was.
Trotsky was a Ukrainian. Born in West Bank Dneiper. Will you claim or reject his Ukrainianess? There’s a bit more Ydna cline I, but that’s it. Hardly possible to tell apart. The Russians are somewhat more Scandinavian though.
https://twitter.com/Qafzeh/status/655522020671680512/photo/1
https://medium.com/@kravchenko_mm/what-should-russia-do-with-ukraine-translation-of-a-propaganda-article-by-a-russian-journalist-a3e92e3cb64
It is interesting that in the translated article in the link here the form of US CRT arguments about Whiteness and White Supremacy appear to have been adopted to justify the invasion of Ukraine, by substituting Ukraine/Ukrainianess for Whiteness and White Supremacy and connecting Ukrainian independence with these concepts.
There is also the trope of saying that Ukrainian Nazism is worse than the original Nazism because it is much more hidden and apparently insidious, looks like a riff off the idea that the problem of racism is worse in the US today than it was in the 30s, because it has become hidden and insidious.
Maybe the first time this sort of Postmodern Social Justice rhetoric has been implicated in justifying major violence, also not surprising that Russian propaganda is being censored here if it has content of this kind, it would mess with some of the official ideologies in the public mind.
The sociology of that needs some explaining. Are they also obese? I’ll take your word for it but these are things that should not be mixed.Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
Yes there are a good number of American negroes who are fine neighbors. They have a Bell curve top end population if that is your preferred model. Just because they aren’t going to win any science Nobel prizes or Fields medals doesn’t mean you should forbid your daughter from dating one of them.
It just makes it a poor bet.
Do you know any negroes?
Don’t see any pro-Russian demonstrations anywhere in the U.S.? Europe? None, in Ukraine? Actually, not many even in Russia? You need to tell the Kremilns that they need to waste more money to organize Potemkin Village type pro-Russian demonstrations somewhere (anywhere?), so that some bodies (live I hope) show how popular the Russian war actually is…I heard somewhere that you’re actually a Russian asset living in the US? I didn’t believe this for one moment knowing that you couldn’t be much of an asset to anybody. Not even RT was interested in hiring you as their man in the US, much to your public protestations.
Pro-Russian demos in Serbia, Bulgaria, Germany, Greece and Israel. Given the heavy-handed bias and bigotry exhibited, it's understandable why some pro-Russians are laying low.
This assessment appears very well premised:
https://www.eurasiareview.com/04042022-handicapping-ukraine-and-russia-west-differences-oped/
Excerpt - I call 'em within reason. An example:
https://www.mintpressnews.com/280167-2/280167/
Excerpt - Repeated elsewhere, has the above claim ever been fact checked and firmly verified? Ames took a job with RT doing non-political segments on life in Russia. After his taking that position, the eXile's content decreased. Shortly thereafter, eXile ended, with Ames no longer employed by RT and leaving Russia.
Was Ames setup and/or did his Russian venture simply lose its mojo, which has been known to happen with some others in the political commentariat business? Keep in mind that there was a global recession in 2008, which might've negatively influenced whatever funding eXile was receiving.Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Mr. Hack
It’s a bad bet.
Textbook case of ignorant outsider stuffing his head with nonsense provided to him by Russians and trying to teach someone about their own people.
A lot of the people in places like Bucha in parts of Kiev province had probably not had a lot of experience with Russians or particularly with people from Russia, until the occupation.
Kiev oblast (province) is 6% ethnic Russian.
The city itself is 25% ethnic Russian.
Before the war people probably figured that Russians weren’t so different, they may have had a friend who was Russian or half-Russian, he seemed to be the same. But this changed when wild Russians came into the country and started killing people.
Of course there is no reason why someone who is part Russian wouldn’t consider Russians and Ukrainians to be different people.
It’s as bright as the line between the Dutch and the Germans, and brighter than between the Swedes, Norwegians and Danes. But the divide in political culture is more extreme: Ukraine is politically a European people who want some sort of democracy, Russians want a benevolent Asiatic despot.
1. The parts tacked on by Stalin where most of the population speaks Ukrainian are about 25%-30% of the country (10 million people or so out of 35 million). They are not some odd sliver of land like the Gaelic-speaking parts of Ireland.
2. The number of primarily Ukrainian speakers in the rest of Ukraine is not “very few” but most of the people in countryside. Whatever the rural percentage is, is the Ukrainian-speaking percentage in those regions. I met a guy in Moscow , for example, who spoke decent Ukrainian to me. He had spent his childhood summers with grandparents in a village in Kharkiv oblast.
So overall probably a little over half the country speaks Ukrainian as their primary language (before Crimea and Donbas left it was less than half). Most of the western 25%-30% of the country and about a third or so of the rest of the country.
3. Pretty much everyone is fluent in Ukrainian even if they do not speak it as their primary language with their friends. It’s close enough that it is easily learned by Russian-speakers.
Ukrainians, Poles, and southern and central Ukrainians are all about the same genetically. But on a more subtle level Russians and Ukrainians can be distinguished for one another and even Ukrainians from Belgorod in Russia are genetically closer to Ukrainians in Lviv than they are to their Russian neighbors (see my other post).
Unlike you, most Ukrainians are willing to fight for their country and have proven this. I had posted poll data showing that Ukrainians would fight for heir country before this war started and the Russians who tricked you scoffed at this and insisted the Ukrainians would surrender quickly. They did not. They are fighting to be masters of their homeland. Something you, an American, have failed to do (IIRC you whine about non-whites taking over the USA, yet you have never done anything about it and have even chosen to have non-white kids). Perhaps that’s why you dislike the Ukrainians, they highlight your own character flaws of treason, cowardice and failure by your own standards.
Ask the Russians. They are the ones who chose to invade Ukraine and murder people. In normal people this creates hatred. Ukrainians didn’t hate Russians until Russian intervention created the civil war in 2014 and really started to hate them now when Russia invaded the rest of Ukraine, killing thousands in places like Kharkiv and Kiev two cities that had once been divided but are now united in rage at the common murderous enemy.
In 2013, before Russia intervened in Ukraine, most Ukrainians liked the Russian people. Even most Western Ukrainians.
Perhaps more like Ireland v UK. But then it might be closer still to a hypothetical Scotland v England.
The hypothetical doesn’t match. They share a long land border with no obvious geographical or linguistic or genetic division. It’s bizarre.
The Ukraine v Russia business looks more like proxy war to me. Im not claiming the Russians and Ukies are the same people.
I noticed Trofim Lysenko was a Ukie. Lysenko is a Ukrainian a Soviet concept.
Countries that are desirable for non-Europeans to move to and that allow non-Europeans to move into them become less European. That is not hard to understand. You don’t think that Germany which is 15% non-European is less European than Poland or Czechia?
You forgot the Baltics, Poland, Czechia and Slovakia which are also European and exclude non-European settlement.
Guess it violates the Russian constitution to make any territorial concessions. But I’d like to see Russia throw down the gauntlet to Japan, by giving them a challenge to meet, in order to get back the disputed Kurils. Something that the Japanese would have to put their backs into.
Like, propagative woolly mammoths. Or five giant robots that come together to form a super-gigantic robot.
I suppose the US getting out of Japan would need to be a precondition.
The hypothetical doesn’t match. They share a long land border with no obvious geographical or linguistic or genetic division. It’s bizarre.
The Ukraine v Russia business looks more like proxy war to me. Im not claiming the Russians and Ukies are the same people.
I noticed Trofim Lysenko was a Ukie. Lysenko is a Ukrainian a Soviet concept.Replies: @sudden death
It’ s no more bizzare than USA and what now is Canada being different and even belligerent states for a long time since 1776 (e.g. 1812 war), despite having a long land border with no obvious geographical or linguistic or genetic division at the time, except Quebec case ofc.
http://www.tbnumismatics.com/mistaken-misogyny-andrew-mellon-laura-fraser--the-george-washington-portraiture.html
There may be a "woke" angle to changing the portrait of Washington right now, but the update is by far the superior design so it may be a case of the right choice for the wrong reasons.
I think the change in American coinage in the middle and second half of the 20th century is symbolic of the death of America the nation and the ascendance of America the Empire. The designs went from various symbolic depictions of Liberty to the bland visages of dead leaders.
As you say, it parallels the differences between Greek and Roman coinage.Replies: @songbird, @S, @RadicalCenter
I guess Lincoln was the first portrait on an American coin in 1909. And it was sculpted by a Jew, who signed his initials or something on the coin, which was controversial.
The idea of a Lincoln penny was pushed based on the 100th anniversary of his birthday. It had already become a holiday at that point, at least in some places. And it gets worse, black history month is based on blacks celebrating Lincoln’s birthday.
It’s interesting to think of American Empire. On the map, the US gave up the Philippines, but, if you counted troops abroad, or dollars abroad, then I suppose it was radical growth of empire.
I blame some of the ugliness in coins on the fact that people were coming off the farms, hence the end of the wheat penny. But that’s probably not right as the redesign decisions were made by only a few men.
Canadians are Americans who reject the Revolution.
This passage is golden and should be learned by all Western racists out there as it means by RF political logic in general they deserve to be “denazified” as well.
- The Classical Liberals and 'old school' left wingers who have been arguing that CRT and the post- modern Social Justice stuff lends itself to justifying division and violence.
- All those further to right who reject it as being one of the Liberal elite's worst recent ideological creations (as well as racists, there would be all sorts of other conservatives in this group).
It's a interesting example of the way Russian elites attempt to copy, then try to one-up on, elite Western ideology when it is useful to them.
Go fuck yourself.
Russians are saying that they hear English words on the radio and see some dark-skinned individuals at the steelworks. I wish they would release the audio. Would be interesting to hear the accents.
You should ask Canadians if they agree with it, if not, then should invade and reeducate by force in order to get acceptance of this definition 😉
Yeah, Russia cares so much to destroy anyone that dislikes black people… (((The Russians))) are coming for you!
It’s a matter of strength, not lack of desire – the more RF army will be demilitarized on UA soil the less capabilty it will have to deal with the “most developed form of Nazism – the American racism”.
It depends whether you conflate the Russian state with ‘Russians’.
Ukrainian identity may highly malleable and the post-Soviet borders nonsensical but I don’t blame them for wanting to strike off on their given how Russia is governed as of now.
Again, I think a revived union state would have been ideal but unfortunately, it does seem the scale of the 90s collapse devastated too catastrophically the governing competence across not just Russia, but all the countries that were a part of it. Putin screwed up. I wonder if Primakov could have done better.
Perhaps that is what you mean? I would think that Sikhism is much more strongly geared toward this interpretation than Hinduism broadly. I'm not exactly an expert on Eastern religions though so perhaps you can clarify based on your own understanding.Replies: @sher singh
Exactly.
The Cult of Mars for ex, would view him as the God of War, but also the Lord of Everything.
So they interpret everything with a warlike fervour.
ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ
Canadians got the Tuna Sandwich instead of the Burger.
The st Lawrence catchment is intelligible and the Victoria Island is a recognizable border. Dividing on that parallel is also intelligible. The border that Russia and Ukraine have is hard to figure out. I’ve looked carefully to see why it formed as it did and cant quite make sense of it.
I think this picture may show the maze coin that you were thinking of. At their high point, ancient Greek coinage is really perhaps unsurpassed in it's elegance and design. The relief is quite high as well which is notable too, giving their coinage a real depth and sculptural quality.
I was an avid coin collector as a kid, and had a fair number of Roman bronze coins since they are fairly inexpensive. Unfortunately, Greek coinage was far outside my pay grade. There is some Roman coinage in the higher denominations which comes pretty close to the Greek in technical ability, but overall the Roman coinage is far cruder and less artistically interesting. It is all political signalling, where the Greeks had an incredible variety of themes.
I completely agree on modern coinage. It's completely graceless and ugly. An eyesore like the rest of the modern project.Replies: @songbird, @S
Hehe! I’m reminded of an documentary I once saw that showed archeologist digging through a Roman layer of pottery shards which you could tell from their facial expressions they looked upon with a bit of disdain as over abundant mass produced junk. It was the Celtic items they came upon below that layer that they saw as being a bit more artistic and ‘soulful’ if you will.
Yes, the Greek coinage could be amazing in their designs with their high reliefs, though as stated, the Roman coinage could be well done as well, and not a slouch.
Below is a Greek Bactrian gold coin circa 150 BCE from the area of present day Afghanistan.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eucratides_I
https://www.rt.com/news/553601-poland-hungary-partners-ukraine/Replies: @Yevardian
Huh. I don’t see it. Orban would have been smart to back Germany’s attempt at neutrality earlier, not go out alone so blatantly now.
God, from Hunyadi to Thököly Petöfi to István Tisza to Horthy, why are Hungarians so utterlyshit at diplomacy? To bad reiner tor isn’t here anymore too expand on Hungary’s unbeaten track record on joining sides just as they start losing.
Imagine Hungary managing to alienate Poland at this time. The only intelligent leader they ever had was Kádár.
LOLReplies: @Yevardian
When Europe militarizes you either try to control the world or you fight among each other… Or both t the same time… What would be different this time? When has a united Europe ever lasted in history???
I may just see if AaronB or Barbarossa bring up more agreeable topics of conversation while you and your mariachis take this forum to the same level as the rest of the site.Replies: @Barbarossa, @utu
“Probably german_reader’s decision is the right one. I’m going to take a break too.” – TWO DOWN! However I do not take great pride from it because useful idiots like you two are the easiest to dispose of. There are real trolls here and they can’t be shamed by proving contradictions in their spiel. They are professionals. And then there are the deplorables who are impregnable to moral arguments. So I am kind of sad that the ones with remnants of human traits are the first that fall. Perhaps the trolls and the deplorables should get Ron Unz treatment: “summarily butchered all […] together with their wives and children.”.
Is Ron Unz a Pol Pot of the 21th century?
You wrote: Metaphors have a vey limited usefulness when one is seeking a comprehension of complex events and processes. On the other hand, they are very effective in terms of emotional persuasion, and that is why I will try to dilute the effect of your comment by proposing alternative instrumentalizations of figurative speech.
The image you use -- home invasion followed by rape -- implies a use-and-discard situation. That is not the case here, so a slightly different metaphor is required: that of forced marriage. The role of EU and NATO would in this case be comparable to that of a young man whom the young maiden has chosen as a husband. This fellow has courted the young lady but in this time of danger he has not fully committed himself.
For fairness' sake, I shall provide a different metaphor which suits the pro-Russia side. Suppose that a man has a sister (or daughter) who has rebellious tendencies. She has been hanging with bad elements and has become addicted to drugs. He invades the place where she is living and tries to drag her by force to a rehab center. She puts up a fight. She asks her drug dealer friend for help. He can only do so much, etc.
----------------------
Now for your present comment.
Aside from your objections, which I endorse, Ron Unz's considerations are very silly because he wouldn't know who his targets were. Would the Trump supporters be included? What about John Mearsheimer? His theory of "offensive realism" is hawkish and he is anti-China. Would Ron Unz have him "butchered" eventually?Replies: @utu
I don’t really want to respond to you here. It is just too convoluted. So I would say yes and no.
As a child, I was in a time and place where we almost didn’t have any immigrants with non-European ancestry, yet neither did we have any much of “Europe” in our public life. Lack of immigrants with non-European ancestry, is not any sufficient condition for “becoming Europe” in postsoviet countries, but it can be effect of having lack of European attractions.
I agree somewhere like central Lvov/Lviv has superficial European atmosphere within the postsoviet space, its beautiful buildings, geographical closeness and history in the Austro-Hungarian empire. But most of the desirable aspects of life in Europe will be absent in Ukraine, including the most important social, economic and political frameworks, and this is the reason that it doesn’t attract immigrants.
Claiming that lacking the positive aspects of Europe (which results in lack of attraction for immigrants), is example of being “more European” is a sophistry. Trying to convert the effect of lacking the European things which attract immigration, into a claim to be more European because of lack of immigration.
Sweden or Norway, could install a corrupt African-style dictatorship, have nuclear catastrophes, destroy their infrastructure, forget their European political theory, and reduce their income to level of Namibia. This would result in becoming a source country for emigration, rather than destination country for immigration, and they could claim to be the winner of the “most European” country in your sense. But with their new “third world economy” and African style dictatorship, they wouldn’t seem very European, in the sense this word has prestige in the rest of the world, even as their population would return to the original melanin levels.
If Ukraine was really “more European than Germany”, then they would be viewed as a utopia by immigrants, and would experience standard “first world problems” relating to immigration policy that every developed country has at the moment.
Because Estonia (the most successful economy of this group) seems to be rapidly converging. If Estonia would one day become like Norway, then they will become destination for immigration, rather than source country for emigration. They will have to start wondering about how to design competent immigration policies.
I don’t think it will happen, but imagine if the other countries will surpass German or France income and welfare levels in the 2030s? Then in 2030s, they would have to encounter the “first world problems” relating to immigration that high income countries experience everywhere in the 21st century.
Culturally, it as though post Soviet bloc countries, Russia included were carpet bombed with little left standing. This was imposed from above by communism but I guess the current Western countries have imposed a similar fate through the globalist/ capitalist paradigm.
Also, Poland, and even Ukraine are hardly as poorly run as sub-Saharan African countries.
BTW periods of poverty are often good form the perspective of preservation. Some of the most beautiful places in America such as Charleston are beautiful precisely because during historical periods of destruction such as the 1950s through 1970s when "urban renewal" ruined old neighborhoods, they were too poor to participate in urban renewal (that is, too poor to destroy the old building and build ugly modern ones). So by accident the beautiful old buildings and neighborhoods survived and remained intact.
Similarly, western Europe is now undergoing a self-destructive process; it's good that parts of Europe are too poor to participate in that. When the rest of Europe comes to it senses, Eastern Europe will remain as a place of native beauty.
But I'm not sure how to pinpoint it exactly, without devolving into more spiritualist mumbo-jumbo beloved of our AaronB.
But I suppose this outlook is not surprising, considering your Post-Soviet childhood, this materialism seems to infect nearly all young Russians. 'Thulean' Friend has it in a more obvious form too, which is interesting because his politics are very different from yours.
Perhaps I was just lucky in that I got out of the post Communist space young enough that I wasn't corroded by it too.Replies: @AP, @Dmitry
No matter, the Koudlam score and video is fascinating.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nFWgiZxnz7oReplies: @Dmitry
Lol he used an old video. This is in Moscow. Fans of Spartak Moscow are fighting fans of Zenit in Moscow.
This was copying of English football culture. But in England, football hooligans were more common in the 1980s. In Russia, there was just a 20 year delay, before copying of this English culture.
Even the girl football fans, can practice by kicking their opponents’ heads. This is how to building the next generation of the hi-tech industry. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYNMHQoiVKI.
What would be interesting about it is other things.Replies: @Dmitry
Maybe not in the 1930s, but we could probably sell a lot of one-way tickets to the 19th century for people like Aaronb.
I watched an interesting interview on YouTube with a famous English professor, writer and logic scholar Bertrand Russell (1872-1970). This video is in 1959 according to YouTube.
Listen to what he is saying at 32:45 in this interview. They ask him about life in the 19th century (he was 28 years old at the end of the 19th century). He says “the world was much more beautiful to look at than it is now”. “Every time I go back to a place I used to know, I think how sad it is. This place used to be beautiful and now it is hideous”.
I remember there is a George Orwell novel 'Coming up For Air' that deals with a similar theme in depth, Betjeman used to frequently talk about it as well, the growing ugliness of the English landscape, of modern architecture and so on. It must have been something noticeable for people born in the 19th century/turn of the 20th century.
Though you can appreciate it in some ways looking at old photos and walking around, I remember standing on the foundations of a demolished stately home on a hill in County Durham looking at the vista, you could imagine how it would have looked from an upper storey window before industry appeared and modern buildings to change the landscape, impressive.Replies: @Dmitry
Is the Pope Catholic? Possibly not… (1)
Christianity needs strong leadership to resist the Jihadist Rape-ugee invasion of Christian lands. Francis advocates for the supremacy of Gaian paganism instead of standing up for God.
When will the Catholic Church get rid of this feckless Pope? Or, have another schism?
PEACE 😇
__________
(1) https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2022/04/is-the-pope-catholic.php
I don't work Fridays, as increasingly fewer Americans do (one of the few positive trends).
I was feeling a bit tired today and lay down in bed and just relaxed, doing nothing much, and just had the spontaneous idea to pray to God - I don't subscribe to any particular religion - but just to take prayer seriously for once and actually focus on praying to an "Other" - a mysterious God that I could not know or understand.
I felt my mind gradually emptying of all concepts and disturbances and the room becoming very vivid and clear, and drifting off into a deep sleep.
I woke up about an hour later and decided to walk to the grocery store to buy some avocados and bananas - I just got another shipment of raw cream for the bananas :)
As I stepped outside everything seemed remarkably vivid, clear, and luminous - as if a veil had been lifted from my eyes. It was a warm day and the air was incredibly soft and pleasant and the sunlight impossibly clear and luminous.
Everything seemed completely different even though it was exactly the same, and for once the incessant chatter in my mind was stilled - in fact I couldn't think of anything to think about and wasn't forming any concepts - an extreme rarity for someone like me who lives way too much in his head :)
I walked for about ten minutes in this vivid new reality with everything seeming so much alive and with a great sense of peace and relaxation.
Is this a small taste - but a taste - of what happens when you don't approach Reality through the mediation of concepts - a map - but apprehend it directly?Replies: @silviosilver, @sher singh, @Mr. Hack, @Barbarossa
Thanks for sharing your experience today. That altered state of perception you describe, perhaps it could be called a state of pure awareness, is something which I think of frequently. It seems to me that this should actually be considered our baseline state and the dulled disconnected consciousness we normally peer at the world through the bulk of the time should be considered aberrant.
I think we more or less have this as children, the ability to really see and feel the world in all it’s truly wonderful and awesome strangeness, power, and wonder. I remember how that was as a child, savoring the world and feeling time stretch out before me. The span between my birthday and Christmas seemed to last forever, now it passes in a heartbeat.
It seems that as we become immersed in the adult world, we live more in our heads, dealing with the abstract, to the point that we live so much in the past or future or in abstract expectations and theorizing that there is precious little time to actually enjoy and experience what is right before us. One of things inhabiting the present, it seems to me, is God.
One definition of prayer, in my opinion, can be understood as the disconnecting of ourselves from the past/ future / abstract narrative that we constantly build and reinforce within ourselves and connecting to the immanence of the Divine in the present moment. A form of reestablishing lines of communication, if you will, and allowing oneself to be an open receptor rather than a broadcaster.
I sometimes wish that it was possible to live in that state more of the time, since as you experienced, it is tantalizing. I suppose that this is much of the point of the religious orders, and hermits; to create an environment where the cultivation of such a state of connection is prioritized. I should ask one of the monks of the nearby Trappist monastery what their insights are the next time I’m up that way.
Going back to time, one of the more distressing things about getting older is that time really does pass quicker and quicker. I suspect that this is mostly a perceptional issue as well stemming from the same factors I mentioned above. Although, even the very elderly feel that time goes increasingly quickly often times and one would think it might seem to slow back down in old age.
I used to be good about consistent prayer but I’ve gotten lazy, and have been the worse for it. Your experience reminds me that I should be better about it. I hope you’ll keep up with it yourself. I think it’s like any muscle, it’s the sort of thing which grows stronger with exercise.
You've managed to touch on important spiritual themes, including childhood and time.
Assuming that the greatest barrier between ourselves and direct contact with God, who is a "presence" in the universe at all the times, is the mental "representations" (map of the world) that the discursive conceptual mind is constantly bringing between us and direct contact with the world, it stands to reason that prayer would be a powerful method of breaking through that barrier - in prayer, you are no longer yourself trying to control and figure out your life through conceptual control, but are reaching out to and surrendering to God.
Its interesting that so much of Eastern spiritual practice is about stilling (or seeing past) abstract mental representations and reestablishing direct contact with Reality - they don't talk so much of God, but that is Who they are meeting :)
And yes, children certainly have a more direct and unmediated contact with Reality as the abstract mind is much less developed.
That is why every spiritual tradition has some version of "returning" to the mindset of a child, although typically in a richer form and without abandoning ones adult capacities.
As much as I love nature now, I remember as a child endless golden afternoons rambling through the hills with our dogs in a state of near rapture :) And the way sometimes a patch of clouds, or a view from a high place, would affect me and transport me to another realm.
If this is not contact with the Divine, I don't know what is. I like this very much - it captures the essential idea of mental "receptivity" that is such a feature of prayer.
For once, in prayer you aren't trying to impose your conceptual net and figure things out yourself.
As for the swift passage of time as we age, I suspect there is much in what you say - perhaps as we grow older and more and more entrenched in the conceptual mind, we lose more and more direct contact with the eternal Divine.
I certainly intend to continue making prayer a part of my life in one form or another.
How much of the brain drain will go into more severe IQ-shredders?
I think it is an arguable point to consider cities unnatural as AaronB as stated and it could be an interesting argument to boot. However, you haven't done anything but dismiss the point out of hand by setting up an unsupported tautology.
Humans seem to be quite unique among the animals in their capability of innovation and transcending natural boundaries. Synthetic pesticides, space travel, or nuclear weapons are hardly "natural" because they represent a fundamental reordering of matter and reality. This is in contrast to pre-modern innovation that repurposed or optimized natural materials or processes. It's fine with me if you choose to embrace the un-natural as something good or neutral, by why pretend as though there is no distinction?Replies: @showmethereal, @Triteleia Laxa
“Humans seem to be quite unique among the animals in their capability of innovation and transcending natural boundaries.”
Because we were created with a different spiritual make up compared to the other animals. That’s also why we have a moral responsibility the other animals don’t have.
I remember Heysel. Liverpool fans do it better.
Being “European” in my mind is primarily about having an intact and living culture. This would necessarily have a racial/ ethnic aspect as well, but anyone who focuses on white skin on it’s own as being a meaningful marker on it’s own is being silly. Your experience growing up is a good example of racial homogeneity alone being insufficient.
Culturally, it as though post Soviet bloc countries, Russia included were carpet bombed with little left standing. This was imposed from above by communism but I guess the current Western countries have imposed a similar fate through the globalist/ capitalist paradigm.
I haven’t read through the thread, here’s a Tweet that seems to provide strong evidence that the missile fired was Ukrainian:
Given the fact that the casing supposedly had “For the Children” written in Russian, that strongly suggests it may have been a deliberate false-flag.
We’ll see whether our MSM picks up on any of this.
They may just give it the Hunter Biden laptop treatment and simply not report it and suppress/censor those who try, or just give the accusation a cursory brief mention with no follow up, and then memory hole it.
We shall see.
Beware all American women. Next time you see the sign
https://i.ibb.co/YcggnrD/French.png
most likely it was placed there by the French who wanted to sent unsuspecting American women to man's bathroom to be assaulted and molested by the French DGSE rape team.Replies: @Ron Unz
I suppose that kind of evidence qualifies as irrefutable. Although a material proof is not even required here, because the truth can be determined through reasoning.
Meaning that to accept the idea that Russians might have done it, one ought to agree that their command is either intoxicated or insane.
You can't trust Russians!
Standard of living are not just material. I would say that happiness has less to do with material standards than societal and spiritual. I would suspect that there are deep comforts that stem from being around those who largely share one’s basic values which most of us are completely ignorant of in this day and age.
My own rural county has about the same population as it did in 1880, but a study of the history paints a pretty clear picture that it was a place much more suited to human thriving and happiness in 1880 than today. Today everyone has all the gadgets and conveniences, but legal and illegal drug use is rampart, unemployment and underemployment is endemic, and families are fragmented and dysfunctional. In 1880 this was a bustling little county on the make with a thriving civic and community life, plentiful employment, and well kept and thriving small farms.
A similar picture is painted by talking to folks in their 80’s and 90’s who remember how it was. I’ve always enjoyed the company of older people so I’ve listened to a lot of stories, and none of them have bemoaned the relative physical discomfort of their younger days. Instead they remember the tight knit communities and families, the freedom, and the ability to live well and with dignity even on a tight budget. Even accounting for the bias of nostalgia, it seems that 100 years ago must have been a happier and more societally functional time.
Tangentially, I have a lot of Amish around me and they have better retention rates than they did 30 years ago. That is basically the closest we can get to a time machine showing that a coherent community is largely preferred to greater physical comfort to those given that choice.
The loss of extended family was barely matched by the increase in material wealth.What we have now is a loss in material wealth, and barely existing families in America.
Another interesting factoid is American avg height only returning to pre 1776 levels in the 1950s.Replies: @Barbarossa
But it is necessary.
Europe does not equal “well run, efficient”. Italy is Europe, after all.
Ukraine, Poland, Czechia, etc. are more European than Germany because they are inhabited almost exclusively by Europeans.
I don’t care about prestige, I care about preservation of native culture and traditions. Communism damaged them in central and eastern Ukraine but they are better preserved in western Ukraine and Poland – the worst damage seems to have occurred in the 1930s and these places avoided that.
Also, Poland, and even Ukraine are hardly as poorly run as sub-Saharan African countries.
BTW periods of poverty are often good form the perspective of preservation. Some of the most beautiful places in America such as Charleston are beautiful precisely because during historical periods of destruction such as the 1950s through 1970s when “urban renewal” ruined old neighborhoods, they were too poor to participate in urban renewal (that is, too poor to destroy the old building and build ugly modern ones). So by accident the beautiful old buildings and neighborhoods survived and remained intact.
Similarly, western Europe is now undergoing a self-destructive process; it’s good that parts of Europe are too poor to participate in that. When the rest of Europe comes to it senses, Eastern Europe will remain as a place of native beauty.
Your points are cogent and basically correct, but there’s strong reek of extremely vulgar materialism in all your arguments. Like some small hidden, shrivelled thing, unbelievably disgusting, almost beyond the level of rational logic, lurking in sensible statements.
But I’m not sure how to pinpoint it exactly, without devolving into more spiritualist mumbo-jumbo beloved of our AaronB.
But I suppose this outlook is not surprising, considering your Post-Soviet childhood, this materialism seems to infect nearly all young Russians. ‘Thulean’ Friend has it in a more obvious form too, which is interesting because his politics are very different from yours.
Perhaps I was just lucky in that I got out of the post Communist space young enough that I wasn’t corroded by it too.
https://tjournal.ru/opinions/570811-vladimir-yakovlev-o-4-glavnyh-metodah-specpropagandyReplies: @Wokechoke, @sher singh, @Coconuts, @Barbarossa
http://www.tbnumismatics.com/mistaken-misogyny-andrew-mellon-laura-fraser--the-george-washington-portraiture.html
There may be a "woke" angle to changing the portrait of Washington right now, but the update is by far the superior design so it may be a case of the right choice for the wrong reasons.
I think the change in American coinage in the middle and second half of the 20th century is symbolic of the death of America the nation and the ascendance of America the Empire. The designs went from various symbolic depictions of Liberty to the bland visages of dead leaders.
As you say, it parallels the differences between Greek and Roman coinage.Replies: @songbird, @S, @RadicalCenter
A valid point.
The comparison with Rome is apt as a lot of people think America transitioned from a republic to an empire during the American Civil War. Abraham Lincoln was it’s Julius Caesar and John Wilkes Booth it’s Brutus. The United States even had it’s own Varus [‘Give me back my three Legions!]. See comment link below under ‘More’ for who the American Varus was.
Point by point the close parallels between the history of ancient Rome and America’s own history are downright bizarre at times.
https://www.unz.com/pescobar/do-you-want-a-war-between-russia-and-nato/#comment-5172335
https://twitter.com/RichardHanania/status/1512939725513912323
Given the fact that the casing supposedly had "For the Children" written in Russian, that strongly suggests it may have been a deliberate false-flag.
https://www.moonofalabama.org/12i/ukrmissile2.jpg
We'll see whether our MSM picks up on any of this.Replies: @S, @utu, @Here Be Dragon, @Peripatetic Commenter
The possibility of a Ukrainian false flag certainly doesn’t fit the present US MSM ‘narrative’ on the war.
They may just give it the Hunter Biden laptop treatment and simply not report it and suppress/censor those who try, or just give the accusation a cursory brief mention with no follow up, and then memory hole it.
We shall see.
https://twitter.com/RichardHanania/status/1512939725513912323
Given the fact that the casing supposedly had "For the Children" written in Russian, that strongly suggests it may have been a deliberate false-flag.
https://www.moonofalabama.org/12i/ukrmissile2.jpg
We'll see whether our MSM picks up on any of this.Replies: @S, @utu, @Here Be Dragon, @Peripatetic Commenter
Those Ukrainians are really dumb. They should have written it in Ukrainian, so Inspector Clouseau-Unz would not be able to make another of his brilliant deductions.
Beware all American women. Next time you see the sign
most likely it was placed there by the French who wanted to sent unsuspecting American women to man’s bathroom to be assaulted and molested by the French DGSE rape team.
coup in Pakistan? US going all out now. Cold War 2 is official.
With what is already happening in Lima and in Sri Lanka, seems like it is going to be a bumpy year.
Beware all American women. Next time you see the sign
https://i.ibb.co/YcggnrD/French.png
most likely it was placed there by the French who wanted to sent unsuspecting American women to man's bathroom to be assaulted and molested by the French DGSE rape team.Replies: @Ron Unz
The image is telling. Please take a look. It even feeds into your interests in the admissions at colleges given the White/Yellow/Black image in the museum diorama. The diorama pulls punches tbh if you read the trial transcripts.Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @nickels
The Russians created the environment where the killing of innocent children would be possible. If they truly feel moved by the deaths of children and civilians they could stop it all by retreating back from where they came from. Nobody needs them nobody wants them, the damage and carnage that they’re creating in Ukraine will never be offset by any possible good that they imagine they’re creating.
Boomers are reliable voters, which is why politicians spend more time gaining their favour. Youth are notoriously unreliable and often too lazy to actually show up and vote on election day. So Macron is likely to bag this election as a win.
That said, the trends in France are concerning:
It’s a common misconception that the young are always liberal. It’s more accurate to say that they are “leading indicators” of political trends. In Germany, AfD gets a small share of the youth vote. In 15-20 years, the political maps of Germany and France could well look drastically different.
https://www.dw.com/en/polands-young-voters-turning-to-the-right/a-47439606
Russia was clever to seek out useful idiots on the Right, because this is the future of much of Europe. Though Russia's efforts necessarily have to be limited to peoples who have not had much contact with Russia and are ignorant about it, such as the Italians and French. Those who have, such as Poles, generally don't fall for it.
Interestingly, young Hungarians seem to dislike Orban, so Hungary doesn't follow the same trend as the Slavs. Long-term, Hungary may be more like the Germanics.
I’ve written before that China will always be at a disadvantage because it is a closed system. Pakistani elites don’t care about Pakistan. They care about their offshore wealth and securing prosperous lives for their progeny, preferably abroad.
That’s not much different from elites in most Third World countries. The current COAS of Pakistan, Bajwa, has three brothers in the US. The former head of CPEC owns several dozen Papa John’s pizza franchise stores across America. For us, this kind of petty peddling is pretty comical compared to the obscene levels of wealth that a Gates or a Bezos have, but it’s a lot in a very poor country.
In the end, their personal business and family interests is what is the deciding factor for them. This creates massive natural leverage for the US, which is why Khan is being attacked from all sides of the establishment (army, supreme court). China doesn’t offer an attractive option in this regard, whatsoever, which is why its ability to influence matters despite its much closer ties to Pakistan on paper is far lower.
It reminds me of the Barzani clan, which is running the Kurdish section of Iraq. Their head bought a massive villa in Beverly Hills, for funds that are almost certainly stolen from the local population.
This is why the corrupt oligarchs of Russia stashing their ill-gotten gains abroad are not going to create a systemic reform, despite pleas from midwit liberals. These liberals don’t understand that corrupting Third World elites is a major foreign policy tool of the West and whenever there is a crisis, it’s an excellent way to call in favors, as we’re now seeing in Pakistan.
Every ideological debate that are identity-based are fundamentally a question of survival and elimination. Race War is first waged with words, then policies, and then finally (sooner or later) guns. Wokes don’t know they have RETVRNed.
Never protested such. Been on the BBC twice, RT once and a 50K watt NY area radio station five times. Where have you appeared other than as Mr. Hack in the comments sections of blog posts? Why did the FBI visit me twice?
Pro-Russian demos in Serbia, Bulgaria, Germany, Greece and Israel. Given the heavy-handed bias and bigotry exhibited, it’s understandable why some pro-Russians are laying low.
This assessment appears very well premised:
https://www.eurasiareview.com/04042022-handicapping-ukraine-and-russia-west-differences-oped/
Excerpt –
I call ’em within reason. An example:
https://www.mintpressnews.com/280167-2/280167/
Excerpt –
Repeated elsewhere, has the above claim ever been fact checked and firmly verified? Ames took a job with RT doing non-political segments on life in Russia. After his taking that position, the eXile’s content decreased. Shortly thereafter, eXile ended, with Ames no longer employed by RT and leaving Russia.
Was Ames setup and/or did his Russian venture simply lose its mojo, which has been known to happen with some others in the political commentariat business? Keep in mind that there was a global recession in 2008, which might’ve negatively influenced whatever funding eXile was receiving.
The last time I listened to War Nerd podcast they sounded like typical mainstream PC assholes and I was sorely disappointed.
Kiev regime set the trend in Donbass leveling whole neighborhoods which didn’t seem to have any armed rebels.
The conflict didn’t suddenly start at the end of February. It has been going on for the past eight years. Kiev regime forces blending in with civilians in civilian areas lead to civilian deaths.
Get over it – it’s a fucking war. Most of those who write drivel like this never said the same when USA + NATO were slaughtering Arabs, uninvited, and half way around the world. Spare us this nonsense.
RUSSIANS GO HOME!
https://link.springer.com/article/10.3103/S0095452715040106
"…A detailed analysis of highly informative Y chromosome markers showed that both nations retain the ethnic specificity of their gene pools after 3.5 centuries of coexistence in the same historical territory: the Ukrainian populations are similar to the rest of Ukraine, and Russian populations gravitate towards the south of European Russia."
https://i.imgur.com/ETnKYkI.jpeg
To be sure, the two peoples are very similar genetically (and Poles are similar to them also). But they can be subtly distinguished. No, he was a Russian. There was one document listing him as Ukrainian, others as Russian but both his parents had Russian rather than Ukrainian surnames.
Khrushchev was also Russian.
Gorbachev and Chernenko were half Ukrainian (Chernenko's father was born in Siberia to Ukrainian settlers); those were the only Soviet rulers of Ukrainian descent.Replies: @Wokechoke, @Indifferent Contrarian, @Thulean Friend
“In terms of haplogroup distribution, the genetic pattern of Ukrainians most closely resembles that of Belarusians. The presence of the N1c lineage is explained by a contribution of the assimilated Finnic tribes.”
So Finns form a part of both Russian as well as Ukrainian ancestry.
The Asian-horde plot thickens 😁
Can’t bother digging up the screenshot, but they found average happiness didn’t change with industry.
The loss of extended family was barely matched by the increase in material wealth.
What we have now is a loss in material wealth, and barely existing families in America.
Another interesting factoid is American avg height only returning to pre 1776 levels in the 1950s.
BTW,
why do morons always write nonsense like “innocent children”?
I mean, spare us the dumb sentimentality and tell us which children that ever died in wars were “guilty children”?
Or the “brutal invasion”? Are NATO/US invasions ever gentle?
Oops
https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-P-WbwkuTPAs/V51zkANK_9I/AAAAAAAAKqk/SmxfH1z4pRIQ2HZUQK1r4Eukjk1xrY6IwCLcB/s1600/Simone%2BSegouin%252C%2Bthe%2B18%2Byear%2Bold%2BFrench%2BR%25C3%25A9sistance%2Bfighter%252C%2B1944%2B%2B%25284%2529.jpg
https://rarehistoricalphotos.com/simone-segouin-18-year-old-french-resistance-fighter-1944/
So Finns form a part of both Russian as well as Ukrainian ancestry.
The Asian-horde plot thickens 😁Replies: @AP
Yes, Poles have small % too. But among Russians it is larger
Russia is around 6% of the world economy. The Chinese are around 29% of the world economy. The alliance they are in is around 1/3 of the productive capacity of the globe. Laxa is delusional. The Russians are clearly not Italy or a Spain in terms of raw resources, industrial nous and human capital. The best we can hope for in the Western world is to keep these two out of warm weather ports entering oceans. They can’t be kept out of the Black Sea.
This is why the cricketer Imran Khan was couped. Karachi is a key port that if friendly to Russia and China would be trouble.
Of course this means the Indians can lease Bombay to Russia now. So it’s six of one and half a dozen of another.
1. There is a difference between fighting a combination of rebels and foreign soldiers within one’s own country as Kiev was doing in Donbas (or as Putin had done in Chechnya, or Assad in Syria) and invading another country as Putin has been doing to Ukraine or America had done to Iraq.
2. No Donbas city was devastated as much as Mariupol, Kharkiv, Chernihiv, or Kiev’s suburbs. Moscow was bombing civilian areas in a far more thorough and indiscriminate manner.
Funny that when Donbas rebel areas were shelled due to Russian military asserts being embedded within them the pro-Russians opposed this argument.
https://www.sott.net/article/466340-Is-it-possible-to-actually-know-what-has-been-and-is-going-on-in-Ukraine
https://www.newsweek.com/putins-bombers-could-devastate-ukraine-hes-holding-back-heres-why-1690494
We know about the basis to level Hiroshima, Nagasaki and Dresden, which is why I'm reluctant to do cartwheels on war. Clint Ehrlich's Twitter feed has plenty of photo and video evidence showing Kiev regime forces taking the use of civilians to another level.Replies: @AP
Pro-Russian demos in Serbia, Bulgaria, Germany, Greece and Israel. Given the heavy-handed bias and bigotry exhibited, it's understandable why some pro-Russians are laying low.
This assessment appears very well premised:
https://www.eurasiareview.com/04042022-handicapping-ukraine-and-russia-west-differences-oped/
Excerpt - I call 'em within reason. An example:
https://www.mintpressnews.com/280167-2/280167/
Excerpt - Repeated elsewhere, has the above claim ever been fact checked and firmly verified? Ames took a job with RT doing non-political segments on life in Russia. After his taking that position, the eXile's content decreased. Shortly thereafter, eXile ended, with Ames no longer employed by RT and leaving Russia.
Was Ames setup and/or did his Russian venture simply lose its mojo, which has been known to happen with some others in the political commentariat business? Keep in mind that there was a global recession in 2008, which might've negatively influenced whatever funding eXile was receiving.Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Mr. Hack
Maybe they claimed the government hated them when the government hardly noticed them for promotion purposes?
The last time I listened to War Nerd podcast they sounded like typical mainstream PC assholes and I was sorely disappointed.
Off topic Ron, but it’s about representations of atrocities.
Here you can clearly see the Vietnamese representing the blackness of Calley’s platoon and the gunmen who shot and raped the Vietnamese villagers.

Why do you think the Vietnamese strongly emphasise this racial aspect of the massacre and western media completely suppress it? It’s clear what the Vietnamese think about the event from this sculpture.
I thought your argument about the officers charged with cover up was slightly evasive as the officers were themselves were merely suppressing the knowledge and dissemination of the actual massacre. They were not present on site. The officers charged were just being typical office drones. Not war criminals themselves, and to be fair to them they had to protect the institution of the Army.
The image is telling. Please take a look. It even feeds into your interests in the admissions at colleges given the White/Yellow/Black image in the museum diorama. The diorama pulls punches tbh if you read the trial transcripts.
These guys had the Ford Rouge plant:
https://www.amazon.com/Phoenix-Program-Americas-Forbidden-Bookshelf-ebook/dp/B00KGMIW6Q
If there were any negroes doing this one they were a tiny minority. This was the best brightest top 1% of the American security talent pool.
Its in their nature.
But I'm not sure how to pinpoint it exactly, without devolving into more spiritualist mumbo-jumbo beloved of our AaronB.
But I suppose this outlook is not surprising, considering your Post-Soviet childhood, this materialism seems to infect nearly all young Russians. 'Thulean' Friend has it in a more obvious form too, which is interesting because his politics are very different from yours.
Perhaps I was just lucky in that I got out of the post Communist space young enough that I wasn't corroded by it too.Replies: @AP, @Dmitry
Wow, you articulated what I had also felt when reading his comments. I think he is a very decent, thoughtful and intelligent person, but indeed there is this touch of rot inside him. It was evident when he expressed the belief that Ukrainians would just surrender quickly and accept being Chechens’ servants in exchange for fancy black burgers (obviously he was wrong, Ukrainians didn’t act like that) which would seem logical in a purely materialistic way if one can’t win anyways.
https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-175/#comment-5187019Where I was naive victim of propaganda, has been the view the Russian army might have been somewhat modernized and effective, not victim of asset stripping and disorganization as much as any other sector. You could re-incarnate the Polish cavalry and they would probably win this time. Replies: @Wokechoke
I think it is an arguable point to consider cities unnatural as AaronB as stated and it could be an interesting argument to boot. However, you haven't done anything but dismiss the point out of hand by setting up an unsupported tautology.
Humans seem to be quite unique among the animals in their capability of innovation and transcending natural boundaries. Synthetic pesticides, space travel, or nuclear weapons are hardly "natural" because they represent a fundamental reordering of matter and reality. This is in contrast to pre-modern innovation that repurposed or optimized natural materials or processes. It's fine with me if you choose to embrace the un-natural as something good or neutral, by why pretend as though there is no distinction?Replies: @showmethereal, @Triteleia Laxa
Not a tautological argument.
At least anymore than your or any argument is tautological.
As all word based arguments are tautological on one level.
Which is also the level on which any random person will engage.
This is why humans discuss things endlessly and never arrive at broadly consensual and honest answers.
It is also why teenagers, and other juveniles, arguing, can be sweet but annoying. They thrive in “proving” their acuity through tautology.
Please understand that words break truth, and tautology is what remains.
The only way to pierce through to meaning is to address your argument to an individual.
So I always write to the individual.
Most people on the sidelines will not be prodded to see truth for themselves by my arguments, but for the intended person, the words will hopefully prompt them to look in the right direction.
You see, they have to perceive it themselves. Through their own form of inner sight.
Analysing my words might help, but, other than checking my words for logical consistency, which might stand-in as a check for my sanity or anyone’s sanity, such analysis will only provide the reader with the confidence to “look” and a hint of where to “see”.
Think of it like me describing a single picture out of a trillion that are in front of you. You’ll need some potentially subjective instructions to know which one.
And this, as you have summarised, is how you see the above things I describe. It is also my default state. Only for me it is quite some +++ from what you describe.
You seem like a great person, but you need to let a lot of judgement of many modern things drop. It takes you away from the spiritual truth which you like and into a sort of analytical frantic loneliness. I suspect the key for you would be fully realising that, despite the extra hardships, you chose your life because that is the ideal life for you, not because the other, more comfortable options, were sinful or fake or unnatural. You don’t need to demean other areas of creation to appreciate your part in it.
You needed this life to calm yourself and find the first beams of inner peace. And in order to achieve that, you needed to separate yourself from the type of stress that unbelievably complex cities, ringing tones, emails and such like provide; which is all so bothersome for you as it throws you off the rhythm and melody which you are trying to access.
But, again, focussing on why you positively, if often unconsciously, chose what has happened, will reveal a lot more to you than disparaging that which was not for you this time. And what it will reveal is yourself, and from there, elements of the universe.
One of my spiritual teachers had a saying. " We are not permitted to say that our way is the only way, but only that it is a good way."
This being taken into account, I think it is still possible and necessary to attempt to distinguish between things which are good, and things which lack good. It is not an easy thing and I won't pretend that my views on it are absolute. I'm sure that I, as is the case with us all, am wrong about a variety of things.
When one looks at the modern world it certainly appears that it is lacking for a great many people. I have a friend who worked in the health department of the local university. She said that about 60% of the student body was on some sort of psych medication or another, often times multiples. Anti-anxiety, anti-depressants etc. This blew me away, since these are people who haven't even begun to deal with life as full fledged adults, and who represent an overwhelmingly affluent and privileged student body. This is just one small data point, but how can one look at a society which produces these outcomes and not see an issue?
Or lets go back to your previous point about all things originating from humans being natural. Can you really say that synthetic pesticides which kill the biome of the soil to such an extent that it becomes dead and inert can be considered "natural" or be worthy of non-judgment just because they exist?
The question that I would pose to you, is a t what point does absolute non-judgement become a form of moral cowardice?Replies: @Triteleia Laxa
Young Italians are also abandoning the Left. If trends continue and the youth don’t change as they age, it will be Germanic progressives vs. Slavic and Romance reactionaries.
https://www.dw.com/en/polands-young-voters-turning-to-the-right/a-47439606
Russia was clever to seek out useful idiots on the Right, because this is the future of much of Europe. Though Russia’s efforts necessarily have to be limited to peoples who have not had much contact with Russia and are ignorant about it, such as the Italians and French. Those who have, such as Poles, generally don’t fall for it.
Interestingly, young Hungarians seem to dislike Orban, so Hungary doesn’t follow the same trend as the Slavs. Long-term, Hungary may be more like the Germanics.
A great many parallels between this present war in Ukraine and the Russian-Finnish ‘Winter War’ of 1939-40.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winter_War
I think we more or less have this as children, the ability to really see and feel the world in all it's truly wonderful and awesome strangeness, power, and wonder. I remember how that was as a child, savoring the world and feeling time stretch out before me. The span between my birthday and Christmas seemed to last forever, now it passes in a heartbeat.
It seems that as we become immersed in the adult world, we live more in our heads, dealing with the abstract, to the point that we live so much in the past or future or in abstract expectations and theorizing that there is precious little time to actually enjoy and experience what is right before us. One of things inhabiting the present, it seems to me, is God.
One definition of prayer, in my opinion, can be understood as the disconnecting of ourselves from the past/ future / abstract narrative that we constantly build and reinforce within ourselves and connecting to the immanence of the Divine in the present moment. A form of reestablishing lines of communication, if you will, and allowing oneself to be an open receptor rather than a broadcaster.
I sometimes wish that it was possible to live in that state more of the time, since as you experienced, it is tantalizing. I suppose that this is much of the point of the religious orders, and hermits; to create an environment where the cultivation of such a state of connection is prioritized. I should ask one of the monks of the nearby Trappist monastery what their insights are the next time I'm up that way.
Going back to time, one of the more distressing things about getting older is that time really does pass quicker and quicker. I suspect that this is mostly a perceptional issue as well stemming from the same factors I mentioned above. Although, even the very elderly feel that time goes increasingly quickly often times and one would think it might seem to slow back down in old age.
I used to be good about consistent prayer but I've gotten lazy, and have been the worse for it. Your experience reminds me that I should be better about it. I hope you'll keep up with it yourself. I think it's like any muscle, it's the sort of thing which grows stronger with exercise.Replies: @AaronB
Thank you for this excellent comment and I agree with almost all of it.
You’ve managed to touch on important spiritual themes, including childhood and time.
Assuming that the greatest barrier between ourselves and direct contact with God, who is a “presence” in the universe at all the times, is the mental “representations” (map of the world) that the discursive conceptual mind is constantly bringing between us and direct contact with the world, it stands to reason that prayer would be a powerful method of breaking through that barrier – in prayer, you are no longer yourself trying to control and figure out your life through conceptual control, but are reaching out to and surrendering to God.
Its interesting that so much of Eastern spiritual practice is about stilling (or seeing past) abstract mental representations and reestablishing direct contact with Reality – they don’t talk so much of God, but that is Who they are meeting 🙂
And yes, children certainly have a more direct and unmediated contact with Reality as the abstract mind is much less developed.
That is why every spiritual tradition has some version of “returning” to the mindset of a child, although typically in a richer form and without abandoning ones adult capacities.
As much as I love nature now, I remember as a child endless golden afternoons rambling through the hills with our dogs in a state of near rapture 🙂 And the way sometimes a patch of clouds, or a view from a high place, would affect me and transport me to another realm.
If this is not contact with the Divine, I don’t know what is.
I like this very much – it captures the essential idea of mental “receptivity” that is such a feature of prayer.
For once, in prayer you aren’t trying to impose your conceptual net and figure things out yourself.
As for the swift passage of time as we age, I suspect there is much in what you say – perhaps as we grow older and more and more entrenched in the conceptual mind, we lose more and more direct contact with the eternal Divine.
I certainly intend to continue making prayer a part of my life in one form or another.
So, because few sympathetic voices were to be heard regarding wars in the Middle East, we should all now sit quietly and watch the carnage taking place in Ukraine? BS! You go hide underneath a rock if you like, I’ll raise my voice as loud as I can and say:
RUSSIANS GO HOME!
The image is telling. Please take a look. It even feeds into your interests in the admissions at colleges given the White/Yellow/Black image in the museum diorama. The diorama pulls punches tbh if you read the trial transcripts.Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @nickels
That is a retail atrocity.
These guys had the Ford Rouge plant:
If there were any negroes doing this one they were a tiny minority. This was the best brightest top 1% of the American security talent pool.
Pro-Russian demos in Serbia, Bulgaria, Germany, Greece and Israel. Given the heavy-handed bias and bigotry exhibited, it's understandable why some pro-Russians are laying low.
This assessment appears very well premised:
https://www.eurasiareview.com/04042022-handicapping-ukraine-and-russia-west-differences-oped/
Excerpt - I call 'em within reason. An example:
https://www.mintpressnews.com/280167-2/280167/
Excerpt - Repeated elsewhere, has the above claim ever been fact checked and firmly verified? Ames took a job with RT doing non-political segments on life in Russia. After his taking that position, the eXile's content decreased. Shortly thereafter, eXile ended, with Ames no longer employed by RT and leaving Russia.
Was Ames setup and/or did his Russian venture simply lose its mojo, which has been known to happen with some others in the political commentariat business? Keep in mind that there was a global recession in 2008, which might've negatively influenced whatever funding eXile was receiving.Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Mr. Hack
I have no idea. Perhaps, it was open season on Kremlin Stooge week? You were there, why don’t you tell us…
It’s my understanding that Russian backed separatists made hiding amongst civilian enclaves a part and parcel of their fighting style, not the Ukrainian side. Also, as in today’s escalation of this war, it was Russia that started the whole provocation in 2014, supplying the rebels with its leadership and with weapons. Again, If they had never started this war, we wouldn’t be having this discussion about children and civilian collateral damage.
Regular Armies are not Guerrilla armies. If Russia occupies swathes of Ukraine where Ukrainian identifying people live in large enough numbers they will have a headache policing the guerrillas.
A uniformed military has slightly different expectations encountering another uniformed army.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vTSLzMDlCRcReplies: @S
Thanks. In regards to the young, ‘immaculate, but hot’ Ukranian woman ‘fighter’ featured, they’re following the WWII propaganda script very closely. Below is a pic of the famous (though quite fashionable) 18 year old French ‘resistance fighter’ Simone Seguin in Paris in late August, 1944..
https://rarehistoricalphotos.com/simone-segouin-18-year-old-french-resistance-fighter-1944/
why do morons always write nonsense like "innocent children"?
I mean, spare us the dumb sentimentality and tell us which children that ever died in wars were "guilty children"?
Or the "brutal invasion"? Are NATO/US invasions ever gentle?Replies: @songbird
I know people who work with children, and they assure me that there are some Damien types.
I'm a non-dualist, which means multiplicity is very real but everything is deeply connected in a higher unity.
With regard to spatial points, it's a question of what "level" you are trying to understand reality on - on the level of utility and power, it's very useful.
On the level of metaphysics, it's not very useful. When trying to understand the nature of the universe (and man's place in it), concepts that work on the level of utility are highly misleading.
Modernity can be said to be the confusion of levels - or rather, the forgetting that the conceptual net we use to navigate the world, does not help us understand it.
To gain power, we must sacrifice understanding. That is fine so long as we remember this - disastrous when we forget this.
To make this all concrete and relevant, the concept of the "point" creates something completely independent from everything else that doesn't actually exist.
If we apply this to the ultimate nature of the universe, we create a world of independent "things", which leads to modern alienation, fear of death, and division and strife - and all based on mistaking an abstraction for reality!
Thing about the title "The Matter With Things" :)
An illusion in the desert, is simply an illusion that isn't useful even on the level of utility.
As for avoiding death - of course we can take action to avoid death and of course we can succeed in doing so :) I take all sorts of actions to avoid death and pain, but I also ultimately embrace and accept both and integrate them into a larger vision.
When this becomes toxic and self-defeating, is when there is complete denial of death and avoiding pain becomes the primary priority, eclipsing all else.
That is when the very thing we are seeking by doing so - life and vitality - gets lost in anxiety and disengagement.Replies: @Beckow
We have just seen it with corona. The C19 hysteria was driven by the the post-modern Western obsession to deny death as part of life’s narrative. We had a tiny portion of the population die prematurely – in most countries 0.25-0.3% – with an average age of victims around 80 and almost always with pre-existing conditions. On average they died about 6-18 months earlier than they would otherwise. Yes, horrible – but how is that a “catastrophic pandemic”?
The endless publicity for tragic corner cases disregards that among hundreds of millions people bad stuff will happen. To scare people, non-observable long-term C19 symptoms were presented as ‘possibilities’. Then it all ended – dropped like an aging floozy, deep-sixed and replaced by a new bugaboo: Russia is destroying the world (again!).
The same people who were obsessing about corona moved on to obsess about Ukraine. The same lack of diligence and paying attention to details, the same emotional over-statements, the same “sky is falling” rhetoric. One suspects that there is now something rotten in Denmark, that the need to over-dramatise and distract is the only way to control the society.
You are right, it has created huge anxieties and some disengagement – but most of it is exaggerated to cover up realities that can’t be allowed to be discussed. It also mobilizes the dumb ones to passively accept things that will explicitly hurt them. The very dumb ones are so unhinged that they ask for things that hurt them – with corona the masked children at home staring into space, questionable and almost certainly unnecessary ‘booster shots’. With Ukraine they ask for an old-fashioned nuclear war (see Sean Penn and similar morons).
Too much anxiety will do this. Once the elites have figured out how to engineer the constant stream of lies, half-lies, fears, emotionalism, hysteria, there is really no way back. These are basically lies, and lies always require two sides: the liars and also the people who willingly accept them. What does it say about so many in the West who willingly go along with these often rather obvious lies?
Ideas of Slavic & Romance Reactionaries vs German Progressives ignore the impact of immigration. Slavic tribalism exists intertwined with Western cargo cultism. Slavic Christianity is literally Western Cargo Cultism.
The logical conclusion of this is Slavs being the most enthusiastic #bombsforblm folk just like they’re the most enthusiastic White Nationalists today.
https://twitter.com/RWApodcast/status/1513140364521185280?s=20
Noble savage myths about homogenous Eastern European poverty ignore where up to 40% of Eastern European youth live – racially diverse metropoles of the West||
ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ
What are the Chinese shouting in Shanghai?
https://link.springer.com/article/10.3103/S0095452715040106
"…A detailed analysis of highly informative Y chromosome markers showed that both nations retain the ethnic specificity of their gene pools after 3.5 centuries of coexistence in the same historical territory: the Ukrainian populations are similar to the rest of Ukraine, and Russian populations gravitate towards the south of European Russia."
https://i.imgur.com/ETnKYkI.jpeg
To be sure, the two peoples are very similar genetically (and Poles are similar to them also). But they can be subtly distinguished. No, he was a Russian. There was one document listing him as Ukrainian, others as Russian but both his parents had Russian rather than Ukrainian surnames.
Khrushchev was also Russian.
Gorbachev and Chernenko were half Ukrainian (Chernenko's father was born in Siberia to Ukrainian settlers); those were the only Soviet rulers of Ukrainian descent.Replies: @Wokechoke, @Indifferent Contrarian, @Thulean Friend
Don’t know if you’ve come across it, but Razib wrote up an interesting piece on Russian genetics which also included comparisons with its neighbors, including Ukrainians.
The logical conclusion of this is Slavs being the most enthusiastic #bombsforblm folk just like they're the most enthusiastic White Nationalists today.
https://twitter.com/RWApodcast/status/1513140364521185280?s=20
Noble savage myths about homogenous Eastern European poverty ignore where up to 40% of Eastern European youth live - racially diverse metropoles of the West||
ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹReplies: @Mr. Hack, @Thulean Friend
How would you react if a neighbor of yours, an uninvited neighbor, killed your family members, leveled your home and continued his aggressive behavior with no end in sight?
Fortunately, water for innocent civilians has been restored: (1) The best answer is some sort of deal between Christian Ukraine and Christian Russia. Zelensky needs to stop taking advice from EU Elites. They do not have the best interests of the Ukrainian people at heart.
PEACE 😇
__________
(1) https://interfax.com/newsroom/top-stories/77505/Replies: @Mr. Hack
“If this is Sinotriumphalism, then you can keep it”
On a slightly more serious note, China’s insane overreaction to Covid is part of the reason why I am skeptical of claims that they will surpass the US(incl. its vassals).
They had early success in beating back the disease but we’re now at what… the sixth wave? This has long stopped being a pandemic and is now a simple endemic. New variants become ever more transmissible. I hate to compare Covid to the common cold, but we’re soon going to be at that level. The current hysteria in Shanghai does not support the idea that the Chinese are übercompetent, as they seem unable to grasp how ‘Zero Covid’ is no longer prudent or even possible.
(The first sign that people overestimate their competence was their disastrous and self-defeating fight with India in 2020, which needlessly alienated a potential partner, as India is becoming more disenfranchised with Biden admin’s lecturing and attacks).
Maybe I am being unduly patriotic, but I still think Sweden’s Covid approach was the best one in the long run. As Tegnell emphasised many times, we’re in this for the long haul so we need a strategy that will work for years, not weeks or months. Events proved him right, IMO.
The logical conclusion of this is Slavs being the most enthusiastic #bombsforblm folk just like they're the most enthusiastic White Nationalists today.
https://twitter.com/RWApodcast/status/1513140364521185280?s=20
Noble savage myths about homogenous Eastern European poverty ignore where up to 40% of Eastern European youth live - racially diverse metropoles of the West||
ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹReplies: @Mr. Hack, @Thulean Friend
Controversial ideas but probably a mixed-bag in terms of accuracy.
I think Poland’s willingness to alienate Hungary due to hysteria surrounding Russia is a long-term mistake from their POV, but I am all too willing to aid and abet it, given that I don’t like political trends in neither country.
40% sounds a bit too much, IMO. In addition, emigration rates have slowed down considerably among the richer eastern EU members. This is not yet true of non-EU countries like Ukraine/Belarus/Russia but a significant chunk of them go to V4 countries or other Eastern European states. The Balkanoids are still losing lots of young people, primarily to the Germanic countries.
But this argument works even better for Punjab, where entire villages are being cleansed of youth for the benefit of living as a wage slave in Kanneda, huddled with 3-5 other strangers living in a basement as a student and then often being priced out of the insane housing market.

Many of these tryhard “Sikh nationalists” now find themselves in this position as their fertility drops like a stone due to incapacity of affording family formation, in addition the cultural mores of Kanneda invariably rub off. Khalistan probably has more supporters in Brampton, Ontario than in Amritsar or Ludhiana these days 🙂
I definitely agree that the insane overreaction to Covid could only have happened in a society that cannot accept death and has lost sight of any larger context to life and survival.
I think fear of death is a primary motive for both the pro-Russisn supporters, among the secular right, and the pro-Ukraine supporters, on the secular left.
I must say, the particular arguments the secular right choose to frame on Sailers blog, for instance, are unsurpassed in their materialistic nihilistic defeatism, and I personally find extremely off putting.
That being said, I also think this conflict is unfolding on the level of myth, symbolism, and moral intuition.
I must say that for myself, I support Ukraine both on the level of moral intuition and instinct and on the level of symbolism. On the symbolic level I think Putinist Russia “stands for” a mentality I despise and oppose, and that is beneath the surface identical to Western mechanistic-technocratic-Woke mindset (obviously, I don’t “support” the West in this either).
Sadly, I also must clearly state in these heated times that I respect the right of anyone to disagree with me and do not demonize them, hate them, or think they are mad or wish to suppress them in any way.
On the moral intuition level I support Ukraine because nothing Ukraine did, however misguided or unwise, supports this level of violence on the part of Russia.
On the level of myth, Ukraine has done the world a great service which we don’t fully understand yet and have not fully assimilated yet – the myth of modernity is that materialism trumps spirit, and the materially weaker must never fight the stronger – that is why everyone thought Ukraine would fold.
Notice, the secular left on Sailers blog has aligned itself with this fundamental myth of modernity.
Ukraine has made a significant contribution to the gradual destruction of this myth that is the work of our times, and I admire their spirit, sacrifice, and willingness to fight against odds for their independence.
All this being said, I recognize that there are disturbing things both about the identity of Ukraine and it’s behavior, but in my opinion this isn’t sufficient to change the larger picture, and that is true of any complex situation.
Similarly, while I avoid mainstream media, the fact that in the West the cultural and spiritual forces I so strongly oppose are so against Russia and for Ukraine is certainly disturbing – but I think this is because Russia and the West represent two competing systems of nihilistic modernity, control through brute force, or control through seduction, moralizing, and gentle but no less thorough enforcement.
Anyways, these are just the opinions of one – extremely fallible – man and increasingly I am not interested in politics, and not interested in getting bogged down in political debates.
And I want to reiterate – totally respect and do not demonize those who disagree with my position – even the nihilistic Sailorean secular right 🙂 – and have no wish to insult, suppress, or cease dialogue with anyone based on political views.
The secular right on Sailers, or large portions of it, seems to have settled on the following surprising position -
Death is the worst thing and that one should always submit to a stronger foe and agree to be violated rather than risk suffering and death, that it is not heroic and admirable for a weaker party to fight against odds in the name of freedom, just stupid, that nothing justifies resistance if you've rationally calculated the odds and they don't overwhelmingly favor you, and that patriotism can only be the result of being brainwashed by cynical elites out for their own enrichment.
Now, it's possible to be pro-Russia without settling on this particular argument, or just have an ambivalent and complicated attitude to the conflict without taking sides, as many people of good will do.
It's significant that the right has settled on a form of materialistic nihilism.Replies: @Beckow
I meant to say the secular right on Sailers blog.
The secular right on Sailers, or large portions of it, seems to have settled on the following surprising position –
Death is the worst thing and that one should always submit to a stronger foe and agree to be violated rather than risk suffering and death, that it is not heroic and admirable for a weaker party to fight against odds in the name of freedom, just stupid, that nothing justifies resistance if you’ve rationally calculated the odds and they don’t overwhelmingly favor you, and that patriotism can only be the result of being brainwashed by cynical elites out for their own enrichment.
Now, it’s possible to be pro-Russia without settling on this particular argument, or just have an ambivalent and complicated attitude to the conflict without taking sides, as many people of good will do.
It’s significant that the right has settled on a form of materialistic nihilism.
Just commenting on the geopolitics not Ukrainian resistance.
@thulean friend how are your farm laws feeling?
But I'm not sure how to pinpoint it exactly, without devolving into more spiritualist mumbo-jumbo beloved of our AaronB.
But I suppose this outlook is not surprising, considering your Post-Soviet childhood, this materialism seems to infect nearly all young Russians. 'Thulean' Friend has it in a more obvious form too, which is interesting because his politics are very different from yours.
Perhaps I was just lucky in that I got out of the post Communist space young enough that I wasn't corroded by it too.Replies: @AP, @Dmitry
Just in this internet forum, we debate about “vulgar materialist objects” (economies, immigration flow, countries, armies, politics), on which politicians (mainly since the 19th century) throw various romantic memes and propaganda illusions to confuse you.*
Romantic memes and propaganda illusions are what result in dehumanizing results, not nerdy people discussing objectively things they superficially learn from the economics textbook.
So, if you say like an engineer, that immigration is a “filter”, you describe its boring reality, whereas if you say “we are brave souls defending our holy land” or “enriching our culture with diversity”, you go into the propaganda world, where power has space to manipulate peoples’ emotion.
If you describe impersonal processes, in an more objective and lower level way, I think you are less likely to actually de-humanize.
Marx’s theory of commodity fetishism says “the relations between commodities becomes like the relationship between people, but the relationship between people becomes like the relationship between commodities”.
Propaganda is similar. Romanticize the impersonal objects with human characteristics, and then the relationship between people become more like those of impersonal objects, while the relation between objects becomes more like relation between people.
In the modern world, the more stable and less dehumanizing results, have been from the political philosophies which focused on the more boring and impersonal foundations.
Actually in Russia, nowadays the space is filled romantic and illogical rhetoric, as it is convenient to disguise depressing reality of what is really happened for the last centuries, both from the authorities and the population. There has continuous decline of the humanistic education, which has been more or less destroyed by politics for a century.
If you escaped from Armenia before university to a better environment, it just means you might have lost appreciation for basic, simple political things, that allow you relax in internet discussions when in your new country. If Aaronb was from Ukraine, then he probably would need to bore people on the internet forums talking about the “rankings for corruption”, “property rights”, “checks and balances”, and the “asset stripping” (I remember this offends some people).
Or nowadays in Ukraine, he would have to worry whether NLAW missile can penetrate armor of T-72s, rather than about milk pasteurization.
When people have the boring framework fixed, then they can go around with LGBT flags or romantic dreams about “return to tradition”. You can see this with your eyes when you are in the West. It’s what happens to people after they already have a Miele washing machine and a Mercedes, and the stable property rights that secured it. Aaronb is already on this stage, and AP already shows some symptoms.
–
* There was a good article about this going viral
https://tjournal.ru/opinions/570811-vladimir-yakovlev-o-4-glavnyh-metodah-specpropagandy
Materialist cultism has been seen as a sign of low class for millennia. - Inferiority complex
https://c.static-nike.com/a/images/f_auto/dpr_3.0,cs_srgb/h_500,c_limit/qh1yrftymm3kpifgtkva/nike-air-force-1.jpg
As a side note my handle Jatt Aryaa not longer works throws up the not usual name error.
I was just warning an internet forum what was going to happen (hopefully with a sense of humor), and unfortunately two months later, everything was already worse than I said it would be.
You know it’s called “shooting the messager”. I said that something dystopian would happen and so it has.
We are watching the catastrophe in slow motion, with thousands of people to be thrown into a sharp metal machine, to be cut into meat.
We were watching this in real time, before it happens, from short clips people collected from Tiktok of the military machines building on the border. To know all these people will be killed, and watch it slowly prepare itself.
I actually wrote a literary expression of my views.
https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-175/#comment-5187019
Where I was naive victim of propaganda, has been the view the Russian army might have been somewhat modernized and effective, not victim of asset stripping and disorganization as much as any other sector. You could re-incarnate the Polish cavalry and they would probably win this time.
https://tjournal.ru/opinions/570811-vladimir-yakovlev-o-4-glavnyh-metodah-specpropagandyReplies: @Wokechoke, @sher singh, @Coconuts, @Barbarossa
Gaillard did a photo project in a Ukrainian city I think. You ought to take a look.
https://www.moma.org/collection/works/190988
Cyprien Gaillard Desniasky Raion.
Ukraine targeted civilians by cutting off water to Crimea. There was no end to their misbehaviour in sight. Why are you surprised that Russia reacted when families in Crimea were targeted?
Fortunately, water for innocent civilians has been restored: (1)
The best answer is some sort of deal between Christian Ukraine and Christian Russia. Zelensky needs to stop taking advice from EU Elites. They do not have the best interests of the Ukrainian people at heart.
PEACE 😇
__________
(1) https://interfax.com/newsroom/top-stories/77505/
For Dmitry,
https://www.moma.org/collection/works/190988
Cyprien Gaillard Desniasky Raion.
https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-175/#comment-5187019Where I was naive victim of propaganda, has been the view the Russian army might have been somewhat modernized and effective, not victim of asset stripping and disorganization as much as any other sector. You could re-incarnate the Polish cavalry and they would probably win this time. Replies: @Wokechoke
I’d be pointing out that the Molotov Ribbentrop annex assured that stalin would have to share a border with Germany and this would lead to Germany having to look over its shoulder at all times. Then I’d place a bet on the USSR and Germany going toe to toe within three years at the Faculty Room pool in Magdalen College.
James Webb was a space hero, who, in his time, helped keep NASA from becoming gay:
https://www.npr.org/2021/09/30/1041707730/shadowed-by-controversy-nasa-wont-rename-new-space-telescope
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/why-china-sticks-with-costly-lockdowns-and-zero-covid/ar-AAW3I1V
Remember a few months ago when the Lügenpresse intentionally mis-reported “alienation” between Israel and Poland over WW II era claims? Despite the propaganda effort, relations between the two nations are still sound.
The Lügenpresse hates the fact that both Poland and Hungary resist authoritarian rule from Brussels. Yes. Hungary and Poland disagree on Ukraine/Russia policy. However, “opinion pieces” about irrevocable “alienation” between the countries are nothing more than fascist propaganda.
Poland has coal while Hungary needs affordable gas imports from Russia. Meeting the energy needs of their citizens and domestic economies is the paramount concern. They have a common, implacable foe in EU “green” energy mythology. This primal issue for national survival outweighs differences on foreign policy.
PEACE 😇
Excluding financial issues, much of this is all still available today. It’s like “slow food” movement. But there is now barrier of self-discipline and economy, while in the past it was forced by necessity.
If your country would decide a policy of “no internet month”. It turns off internet for one month (maybe you add turning off television), every year. In this month, by necessity, people’s attention span would extend, they would start to practice musical instruments, not check their phone in the cafe, read old books, do stargazing in the park.
Everyone would probably say it was their favorite month in the year.
But we can all do “no internet month” in our non-working time, if we wanted. However, the barrier is self-discipline.
Religious communities can reject certain technology, by “hacking” this lack of discipline using social pressure. Haredi Jews have to live in close villages or confined buildings with high population density, because they are constantly watching each other like to see that they obey all their rules. It is not only result of individual self-discipline, but also social pressure.
It’s similar with healthy lifestyle of Seventh Day Adventists in Loma Linda. It’s not one person abandoning hamburgers, but all their friends and neighbors choosing.
The problem as it appears to me is this. By and large people will under no circumstances self moderate. It would be nice to believe that they will and can be capable of it with a few sociological tweaks, but the actual human experience points to the opposite conclusion.
There are some people who may be able to self moderate or impose limiting factors on themselves. I do this in a few ways, one of which is refusing to own a smart phone. I personally find the allure of so many interesting articles and opinions on the internet to be a temptation which would siphon off an unacceptable amount of time better spent actually doing things. I don't trust myself to not be the person who reflexively whips out their cell phone every time they have a spare 30 seconds.
By in general it is hard to put into action a cohesive plan of limitation without a coherent social group which believes similarly. The modern technologies of the automobile and mass communication have erased or weakened to the point of symbol most of these organic groupings, and those same technologies make the forming of new groups difficult. These groupings took a long time to form and cannot be wished into existence.
So, I believe that humans require hard limitations imposed if they are to behave in any way but radical self indulgence. It might be tempting to say that government should step in to provide that, but that is a solution which usually is only a veiled attempt to enrich one group at the expense of another, or to impose an arbitrary set of priorities from one megalomaniac (like the destructive madness of the Soviet system). The format of the natural world providing that ceiling of limitations is probably the best as it then sets the stage for the flowering of a variety of human cultures in an organic manner. This process has generally resulted in what we like to call "culture" in all it's idiosyncratic wonder.Replies: @AaronB
The secular right on Sailers, or large portions of it, seems to have settled on the following surprising position -
Death is the worst thing and that one should always submit to a stronger foe and agree to be violated rather than risk suffering and death, that it is not heroic and admirable for a weaker party to fight against odds in the name of freedom, just stupid, that nothing justifies resistance if you've rationally calculated the odds and they don't overwhelmingly favor you, and that patriotism can only be the result of being brainwashed by cynical elites out for their own enrichment.
Now, it's possible to be pro-Russia without settling on this particular argument, or just have an ambivalent and complicated attitude to the conflict without taking sides, as many people of good will do.
It's significant that the right has settled on a form of materialistic nihilism.Replies: @Beckow
I agree with a lot of what you said. Not all.
One can take a position that any level of violence is unsupported. That is obviously a dead end in a world where violence is used all the time – lately mostly by the West. There is a violent context for the war: Ukraine attacked and bombarded Donbas for 8 years killing 10k people – only 3k supposedly ‘civilians’ but that is hard to validate. Moving NATO into Ukraine was a precursor to violence – and unnecessary.
To dismiss it as misguided is an understatement. I am still waiting to hear from someone what were the better alternatives for Russia. Wait? Surrender? Nuke Kiev? Move beyond Urals?
You admire the non-materialistic Ukies who are willing to die in a hopeless struggle. On some level it is refreshing, but also pointless. The West is not about to change its nihilistic materialism and the sad martyrdom may have the opposite effect – an even stronger desire to avoid (and deny) death.
I have seen many interviews with Ukie POWs (I understand Russian and even Ukrainian relatively well) – almost without exception they repeat that they don’t want to fight, don’t want to die, say that they were lied to, that they joined the army or Azov purely for money. Maybe it is propaganda or self-preservation. What is missing is what you are seeing: martyrdom. I suspect when this is over most Ukies – even the soldiers – will look back in regret and forever claim that they were simply following orders. West is skillful enough to create some symbols from it via Hollywood and media, but it doesn’t seem very real.
As we move forward in the world there are only a few alternative paths. The materialism-nihilism in both the West and Russia (also Ukraine) has the upper hand: cheap, plentiful food, easy lives, low-brow entertainment. It fits the generic man IQ and libido (or the lack of). Like with pets, the immediate material rewards are way too tempting to forego – that has consequences.
Moderation has a whiff of asceticism about it so it loses out. What used to keep us biologically sound was the material struggle for survival, that’s what drove evolution. There is no more evolution now, we are visibly devolving. The fat, short, swarthy, hirsute, unhealthy creatures of unknowable origin that populate most of the Western cities are not going to rule the world, but they are quite capable of destroying it.
Rather, modern softness is the culmination of a world view that sees life as primarily about the struggle for survival.
Think about it - if someone adopts s very harsh view of life as a place of constant menace and threat, he will naturally pour all his efforts into developing the means to survive and establish security.
Developing "survival technology" in the broadest sense - as not just mechanical inventions but also "systems" of control and security like bureaucracy, and mentalities and attitudes that prioritize survival and security at the expense of all else - then to the extent that he is successful at this effort life will become correspondingly "soft".
In other words, the "struggle for survival" leads inexorably towards the development of a soft way of life that directly undermines the feeling of aliveness and vitality that is the whole purpose of surviving.
It's this kind of paradoxical dynamic - this kind of consistently self-defeating behavior - that characterizes a culture that is too far lost in logic and analysis and has lost sight of larger truths.
It's highly significant that pre-modern cultures did not view life as a struggle for survival despite the element of struggle and the risk and precariousness of life being much more pronounced.
A Christian society does not have as it's primary view the belief that life is a struggle for survival - on the contrary, that is - not alone but one of the major - views that ushered in modernity.
So where is this all leading?
It may seem like a paradox to you, but modern decadence and enervation will not be solved by a return to a struggle for survival. The culmination of the struggle for survival leads to a soft and decadent society ineluctably.
Rather, modern decadence will be solved by de-prioritizing survival - embracing death and suffering and integrating them into a larger vision of health and vitality.
Struggle for survival? Rather, no longer trying so hard to survive.
But in order to make this transition, we will have to "zoom out" from the narrow focus of logic and analysis we have gotten trapped in, and see the larger picture from which death and suffering are redeemed and integrated into a larger picture.
And for that we need metaphysics, religion, spirituality, etc.Replies: @AaronB
Please try to focus and keep your answer specific and concrete.
Though honestly, I don't think you'll be able to, because you don't actually have an argument.
Just a feeling of outrage and some hysterical babble you tell yourself to justify it.
But I'd be delighted to be proven wrong about you.
Perhaps your best answer would be the very simple: "I, Beckow, was completely wrong about this war, Russian military prowess, NATO intentions towards Russia and Ukraine in general."
Complete with an illuminating explanation for why you think you ended up being so utterly clueless?
That would show you as a truly strong, intelligent and courageous individual.
But sadly you are likely not. And will rant off some vague nonsense, without ever asking yourself why you're doing it. Like "why" on a personal level does Beckow feel so compelled?
Now I feel sad.Replies: @Beckow
https://tjournal.ru/opinions/570811-vladimir-yakovlev-o-4-glavnyh-metodah-specpropagandyReplies: @Wokechoke, @sher singh, @Coconuts, @Barbarossa
Your entire premise then is that only rich people can reject materialism.
Materialist cultism has been seen as a sign of low class for millennia. – Inferiority complex
As a side note my handle Jatt Aryaa not longer works throws up the not usual name error.
This is a very common secular view, that sees the struggle for survival and modern softness as antithetical to each other, indeed as alternative ways of life.
Rather, modern softness is the culmination of a world view that sees life as primarily about the struggle for survival.
Think about it – if someone adopts s very harsh view of life as a place of constant menace and threat, he will naturally pour all his efforts into developing the means to survive and establish security.
Developing “survival technology” in the broadest sense – as not just mechanical inventions but also “systems” of control and security like bureaucracy, and mentalities and attitudes that prioritize survival and security at the expense of all else – then to the extent that he is successful at this effort life will become correspondingly “soft”.
In other words, the “struggle for survival” leads inexorably towards the development of a soft way of life that directly undermines the feeling of aliveness and vitality that is the whole purpose of surviving.
It’s this kind of paradoxical dynamic – this kind of consistently self-defeating behavior – that characterizes a culture that is too far lost in logic and analysis and has lost sight of larger truths.
It’s highly significant that pre-modern cultures did not view life as a struggle for survival despite the element of struggle and the risk and precariousness of life being much more pronounced.
A Christian society does not have as it’s primary view the belief that life is a struggle for survival – on the contrary, that is – not alone but one of the major – views that ushered in modernity.
So where is this all leading?
It may seem like a paradox to you, but modern decadence and enervation will not be solved by a return to a struggle for survival. The culmination of the struggle for survival leads to a soft and decadent society ineluctably.
Rather, modern decadence will be solved by de-prioritizing survival – embracing death and suffering and integrating them into a larger vision of health and vitality.
Struggle for survival? Rather, no longer trying so hard to survive.
But in order to make this transition, we will have to “zoom out” from the narrow focus of logic and analysis we have gotten trapped in, and see the larger picture from which death and suffering are redeemed and integrated into a larger picture.
And for that we need metaphysics, religion, spirituality, etc.
Russia, in the other hand, attacked with the full confidence of an overwhelmingly superior modernized army, which affirms the basic mythos of modernity.
Moreover, the Russian expectation of a quick Ukrainian collapse is an indication of the Russian value system - they seem genuinely shocked that anyone can not prioritize survival, and not bow to superior power.
It's so un-modern.
In this it is no different than the West, or China.
As for where are we going forward in the West (and the world)?
Obviously and as you correctly see, there simply is no solution from within the current paradigm.
All the options of the current paradigm have been exhausted, and we are just doing over and over what doesn't work. The current paradigm is logic and analysis and control, just more and more of it.
What is happening now though is the steady buildup of stresses and collapses within the current paradigm, which will ultimately lead to it's widespread collapse, which will include China and Russia and the whole world.Replies: @silviosilver, @Dmitry, @Beckow
What would have been the problem for Russia if Russia had simply not invaded Ukraine?
Please try to focus and keep your answer specific and concrete.
Though honestly, I don’t think you’ll be able to, because you don’t actually have an argument.
Just a feeling of outrage and some hysterical babble you tell yourself to justify it.
But I’d be delighted to be proven wrong about you.
Perhaps your best answer would be the very simple: “I, Beckow, was completely wrong about this war, Russian military prowess, NATO intentions towards Russia and Ukraine in general.”
Complete with an illuminating explanation for why you think you ended up being so utterly clueless?
That would show you as a truly strong, intelligent and courageous individual.
But sadly you are likely not. And will rant off some vague nonsense, without ever asking yourself why you’re doing it. Like “why” on a personal level does Beckow feel so compelled?
Now I feel sad.
If somebody “willingly accepts” a lie, it doesn’t mean he knows it’s a lie. People are deceived all the time. In fact, as the aphorism erroneously attributed to Twain puts it, “it’s easier to fool a man than to convince him he is being fooled.” I would only add: vastly easier.
Rather, modern softness is the culmination of a world view that sees life as primarily about the struggle for survival.
Think about it - if someone adopts s very harsh view of life as a place of constant menace and threat, he will naturally pour all his efforts into developing the means to survive and establish security.
Developing "survival technology" in the broadest sense - as not just mechanical inventions but also "systems" of control and security like bureaucracy, and mentalities and attitudes that prioritize survival and security at the expense of all else - then to the extent that he is successful at this effort life will become correspondingly "soft".
In other words, the "struggle for survival" leads inexorably towards the development of a soft way of life that directly undermines the feeling of aliveness and vitality that is the whole purpose of surviving.
It's this kind of paradoxical dynamic - this kind of consistently self-defeating behavior - that characterizes a culture that is too far lost in logic and analysis and has lost sight of larger truths.
It's highly significant that pre-modern cultures did not view life as a struggle for survival despite the element of struggle and the risk and precariousness of life being much more pronounced.
A Christian society does not have as it's primary view the belief that life is a struggle for survival - on the contrary, that is - not alone but one of the major - views that ushered in modernity.
So where is this all leading?
It may seem like a paradox to you, but modern decadence and enervation will not be solved by a return to a struggle for survival. The culmination of the struggle for survival leads to a soft and decadent society ineluctably.
Rather, modern decadence will be solved by de-prioritizing survival - embracing death and suffering and integrating them into a larger vision of health and vitality.
Struggle for survival? Rather, no longer trying so hard to survive.
But in order to make this transition, we will have to "zoom out" from the narrow focus of logic and analysis we have gotten trapped in, and see the larger picture from which death and suffering are redeemed and integrated into a larger picture.
And for that we need metaphysics, religion, spirituality, etc.Replies: @AaronB
Ukraine has made a significant contribution to overcoming late-decadent modernity by demonstrating that against expectations and unlike the entire modernized world, they did not prioritize survival.
Russia, in the other hand, attacked with the full confidence of an overwhelmingly superior modernized army, which affirms the basic mythos of modernity.
Moreover, the Russian expectation of a quick Ukrainian collapse is an indication of the Russian value system – they seem genuinely shocked that anyone can not prioritize survival, and not bow to superior power.
It’s so un-modern.
In this it is no different than the West, or China.
As for where are we going forward in the West (and the world)?
Obviously and as you correctly see, there simply is no solution from within the current paradigm.
All the options of the current paradigm have been exhausted, and we are just doing over and over what doesn’t work. The current paradigm is logic and analysis and control, just more and more of it.
What is happening now though is the steady buildup of stresses and collapses within the current paradigm, which will ultimately lead to it’s widespread collapse, which will include China and Russia and the whole world.
Time to whip out that get of out jail free card again. :)Replies: @AaronB
Ukraine has very little air force, but the Russian air force doesn't have targeting pods - it can only attack fixed targets. Reality of ground forces have been more balanced than expected.Replies: @AaronB, @Wokechoke, @AP
Please try to focus and keep your answer specific and concrete.
Though honestly, I don't think you'll be able to, because you don't actually have an argument.
Just a feeling of outrage and some hysterical babble you tell yourself to justify it.
But I'd be delighted to be proven wrong about you.
Perhaps your best answer would be the very simple: "I, Beckow, was completely wrong about this war, Russian military prowess, NATO intentions towards Russia and Ukraine in general."
Complete with an illuminating explanation for why you think you ended up being so utterly clueless?
That would show you as a truly strong, intelligent and courageous individual.
But sadly you are likely not. And will rant off some vague nonsense, without ever asking yourself why you're doing it. Like "why" on a personal level does Beckow feel so compelled?
Now I feel sad.Replies: @Beckow
Don’t be sad. Easter is here, Jesus has risen, all will be well. Ukies will lose the war, Donbas (and probably more) will join Russia, NATO will lick its wounds and do endless exercises in Poland and Estonia. You will find another hysterical cause, maybe what you said before about how “the West meant well when bombing Beograd and Baghdad, but Russia is pure evil!“.
You can have symposia with Powerpoint slides listing the “differences” and why it is “not the same”. Tony Blair can come in as a guest speaker and talk about the horrible Russia’s war crimes. If nothing else that level of hypocrisy is entertaining.
Ukraine would forcibly de-russify its Russian leaning population, possibly even in Donbas. And NATO would be in Ukraine – either unofficially or officially. That is what would happen and you know it – you like it so you will pretend that is a good thing or alternatively that there was no conslusive proof that it would happen.
Both were a red line for Russia – as would China having bases in Quebec or Ireland be for US and UK. Or de-frenchifying Vallonia, or de-Swedifying parts of Finland, or de-magyarising Romania, etc…nations tend to look askance at their own people being eliminated whether culturally and linguistically, or physically. Remember the hysteria about Albanians in Kosovo not having their “own schools” – what the f..k, NATO decided to bomb. But you say they meant well.
Try to answer what I wrote instead of the lame musings about me. You don’t know me, it is embarrassing for you to pretend. Stick with the discussion.
What Barbarossa leaves out of this tale is any self-reflection from the oldsters whose wisdom fortifies his values. If the old ways were so good, why were they all so eager to abandon them? Nobody forced them to upgrade to washing machines, microwave ovens and so on. I suspect their dirty little secret is they enjoyed material comfort as much as anyone ever did. Claiming the good old days were so much better comes on the cheap if you never have to go back to them. The most straightforward interpretation of their remarks is: rose-tinted glasses.
For example, in Scotland and Ireland, peasants were often forcefully cleared off the land. I don't mean that they were just told to leave, and meekly complied - I mean, they were met with overwhelming force - hundreds of men, who unroofed their houses, pulled them down, or stapled their doors. The land was given over to grazing, so that they really did not have any option but to urbanize or emigrate.
The landlord system was a very different system from old clan culture, where people were virtually guaranteed a piece of land, if they belonged to a clan. But this was just among the first of many disruptions.
Within the US, some of the best agricultural land was out in the Mid West, and technologies like trains and refrigerated cars, meant that it was hard to compete with them, when you had smaller plots and stony soil, like in New England. So, in many places, the land reforested, and you can still see the old stone walls.
Another major change was mechanization, which cut down on the labor that was needed for farming.
______
Cities are population sinks, but in the countryside there is an economic uncertainty which never existed before, and which is only heightened by people moving out of rural areas.
There is an imbalance in the land. And I think one of the core problems of civilization (which touches on things like family, community, and TFR) is figuring out a way to rebalance it.
If you've never read E.M. Forsters' short "When the Machine Stops" from 1908 give it a try and see if it doesn't resemble the character of our modern world in uncanny ways. He wrote it in response to Wells' technological utopianism.
My beef is not with all technology, but the uses it has often been put, many of which amount to being able to do stupid things faster. Perhaps it would be possible to have some of the advantages of modernity without all the unfortunate negatives. That would be a thought. Opportunities missed.
Russia, in the other hand, attacked with the full confidence of an overwhelmingly superior modernized army, which affirms the basic mythos of modernity.
Moreover, the Russian expectation of a quick Ukrainian collapse is an indication of the Russian value system - they seem genuinely shocked that anyone can not prioritize survival, and not bow to superior power.
It's so un-modern.
In this it is no different than the West, or China.
As for where are we going forward in the West (and the world)?
Obviously and as you correctly see, there simply is no solution from within the current paradigm.
All the options of the current paradigm have been exhausted, and we are just doing over and over what doesn't work. The current paradigm is logic and analysis and control, just more and more of it.
What is happening now though is the steady buildup of stresses and collapses within the current paradigm, which will ultimately lead to it's widespread collapse, which will include China and Russia and the whole world.Replies: @silviosilver, @Dmitry, @Beckow
Sounds kinda thumotic, wouldn’t you say? But weren’t you recently condemning thumotic motivations?
Time to whip out that get of out jail free card again. 🙂
I pointed out once that I thought Russia's motives were thymotic, as a counterpoint to what seems to me the superficial idea that they were entirely practical, rationalistic considerations, which seemed ludicrous to me.
But I don't remember saying thymotic motives are bad - that's a typical modern idea that anything not practical and rational is "bad" :) If anything, I was appreciative of the thymotic element in Russia's motives. ***
However, just because something is thymotic doesn't mean it's moral, good, and just.
That's a seperate question.
Thymotic just means you're connected to your emotions, which is vital for your spiritual health and even, interestingly, to having more accurate cognitive impressions!
Modern Westerners are "devitalized" in large extent because they're disconnected from their emotions.
How's that for a get out of jail free card :)
**** On balance, my current assessment of Russian motives is that they stem much more from the typically modern mindset of control-freakery, paranoia that results from too much logical analysis, and a truly modern overvaluation of material strength and power and neglect - even contempt for - spiritual factors.
I won't deny there is also a thymotic element in there of course, too.
The loss of extended family was barely matched by the increase in material wealth.What we have now is a loss in material wealth, and barely existing families in America.
Another interesting factoid is American avg height only returning to pre 1776 levels in the 1950s.Replies: @Barbarossa
I wouldn’t be surprised by this at all. Early industrial cities were the absolute worst for health. Colonial America was predominantly rural and rural populations have always had good relative health. This has inverted somewhat in modern America since obesity and drug use has ravaged our rural populace. Of course, this is because they have essentially abandoned a rural lifestyle despite living in the country.
Kiev regimes started the conflict by overthrowing a democratically elected president after he signed an internationally brokered power sharing agreement – followed by increased anti-Russian action, which many in the former Ukrainian SSR have opposed. Likewise with the Kiev regime’s stonewalling of the UN approved Minsk Protocol and foolish subservience to neocon/neolib agenda on NATO expansion.
As I noted earlier, the Kiev regime brazenly hit neighborhoods where there were no signs of armed rebels. Kiev regime has taken using civilians to a much higher level. No Russian help would’ve meant a greater disaster for the people in Donbass not wanting svido rule.
Already did.
Legally correct.
To date, Russian action in Ukraine hasn’t been at the same brutal level as what the US did in Afghanistan and Iraq after six weeks of fighting. Related are these pieces by Jacques Braud and Bill Arkin:
https://www.sott.net/article/466340-Is-it-possible-to-actually-know-what-has-been-and-is-going-on-in-Ukraine
https://www.newsweek.com/putins-bombers-could-devastate-ukraine-hes-holding-back-heres-why-1690494
We know about the basis to level Hiroshima, Nagasaki and Dresden, which is why I’m reluctant to do cartwheels on war.
Clint Ehrlich’s Twitter feed has plenty of photo and video evidence showing Kiev regime forces taking the use of civilians to another level.
According to UN, there have been about 1,800 documented civilians killed in Ukraine (real number is higher because not all the dead have been found, it's probably at least 2,500 at minimum, more likely 3,000-4,000).
https://ukraine.un.org/en/177284-ukraine-civilian-casualties-9-april-2022
Estimates of umber of civilians killed in Afghan invasion form October to December 2001 ranges from 1,500 to 2,400:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_invasion_of_Afghanistan
Iraq was more bloody for civilians, but not by much. Estimates of civilian deaths form the Iraq invasion range from 3,200 to 7,300:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_invasion_of_Afghanistan
Of course, these numbers occurred when America managed to seize all of Iraq. Russia has killed around 2,000 Ukrainian civilians (at least) despite only grabbing some peripheral areas. Per population of area seized, Russia is far deadlier to Ukrainian civilians than the USA was to Afghans and Iraqis, not even close.
Putin kills Slavs more than Anglos kill Arabs and Afghanis. Remember that.Replies: @Mikhail
I seem to know you better than you know yourself. My comment predicted yours. How can you not even see yourself?
I also asked this:
What would have been the problem for Russia if Russia had simply not invaded Ukraine?
You answered that had Russia not invaded then Ukraine would have conducted its sovereign affairs in a way that Russia did not want.
I’m not bothered to go into the detail of your hysteria and exaggerations, because even if taken at face value, they are irrelevant to the question.
The rest of your reply is some whataboutism regarding Iraq. A war which was launched when I was a child and for which you call me a hypocrite. Ok, grandpa, go take your dementia meds and all will be fine.
And you also do some mindless and self-contradictory ranting about how completely ineffective NATO is and how it never posed nor poses any military threat to Russia; which I sort of agree on, but it rather makes my point for me about the pointlessness of the Russian invasion.
As for Russia’s total victory any day soon, enjoy your pathetic copium. The Russiabot narrative will change and diminish again in a month. Enjoy re-re-re-revising your “victory” conditions to:
“The glorious Russian army launched a defensive war against the fanatical Nazis of the Ukraine and by amazing feats of arms, against the black-shirted hordes, they managed to somehow keep the border that we started with. What an amazing day! Yes, we sacrificed about half of our effective army, but we kept our internationally recognised territories, and anyway, we never actually tried and were so extremely humane, and we are the poor innocent victims here of bully Ukraine, and we are not fake and gay at all, oh look over there, the US has a REMF Admiral in a dress!”
Enjoy!
Well, I think part of was that people were living in agricultural communities, and then the economic basis for agriculture changed.
For example, in Scotland and Ireland, peasants were often forcefully cleared off the land. I don’t mean that they were just told to leave, and meekly complied – I mean, they were met with overwhelming force – hundreds of men, who unroofed their houses, pulled them down, or stapled their doors. The land was given over to grazing, so that they really did not have any option but to urbanize or emigrate.
The landlord system was a very different system from old clan culture, where people were virtually guaranteed a piece of land, if they belonged to a clan. But this was just among the first of many disruptions.
Within the US, some of the best agricultural land was out in the Mid West, and technologies like trains and refrigerated cars, meant that it was hard to compete with them, when you had smaller plots and stony soil, like in New England. So, in many places, the land reforested, and you can still see the old stone walls.
Another major change was mechanization, which cut down on the labor that was needed for farming.
______
Cities are population sinks, but in the countryside there is an economic uncertainty which never existed before, and which is only heightened by people moving out of rural areas.
There is an imbalance in the land. And I think one of the core problems of civilization (which touches on things like family, community, and TFR) is figuring out a way to rebalance it.
The Russians seek codification of their presence in Crimea and their exclusive possession of the Sea of Azov. If Ergdogan can live with that Zelenskyy will be compelled to officially hand it over. You mentioned the 19th century, I tend to see the problem as a 16th century issue. The Muravsky Trail is too important a raiding route for the Russians to leave in the hands of supplicants to Brussels, London and Washington and their military establishments. They will absorb massed casualties to fortify the ridgeways stretching from Crimea to Kursk. If Erdogan wants the resumption of shipping fees through the Bosporus he’ll tell Zelenskyy to pack it in.
Well, for you, Jesus is rising not a day too soon. You need him with your shallowness and hatreds.
“Irrelevant“, you don’t say? I suppose the fact that country A did something that country B is accused of doing now is irrelevant when country A goes ape-shit about it. Very profound, I am not sure any meds can help with that, low critical reasoning skills are not something that can be fixed.
You simply didn’t address my points. Is it because you don’t have an answer or because deep inside you sense that I am right? The war became inevitable when – for 8 years! – Kiev refused a compromise and refused to consider that the “sovereign” elimination of anything Russian in its population combined with insisting on joining an aggressive military alliance against Russia are in themselves acts of war. Check history for numerous examples.
I pointed out to you that if Quebec was about to join a military alliance with China-Russia and at the same time banned English language in schools and offices and told the English Quebecois to pack it up and leave if they don’t like it – and killed a few thousand of them who resisted…let’s just say that I sincerely doubt you would be telling us about Quebec sovereignity.
You either see it or you don’t. But at least try to be consistent and don’t argue by assertion (“irrelevant!”).
Russia is winning the war and has achieved their stated objectives other than liberating parts of Donbas. It is possible that Russia is lying and the goals were much broader – taking Kiev for example. We have no way of knowing, they won’t tell us and the West has a PR incentive to make up things. As it looks now, Russia effectively controls the Black See coast and there is little chance of NATO in Ukraine. How is that a loss?
https://tjournal.ru/opinions/570811-vladimir-yakovlev-o-4-glavnyh-metodah-specpropagandyReplies: @Wokechoke, @sher singh, @Coconuts, @Barbarossa
It is a bit weird though, nowadays most of the return to tradition stuff is very mild and larpy compared to the manifestations of this kind of thinking in the earlier decades of the 20th century, and the people who embraced it at that time had life experiences that make those of most post-Soviet people look affluent and safe (except now in Ukraine some flavour of that era is making a comeback).
In medieval times, for radically simplifying life, we had the institution of monasteries and convents. Although they were most times probably really living more luxurious than majority of people who were in the peasant population. In early 20th century secular world, there are all kinds of artistic and bohemian movements, but not so many real transformations of lifestyle. These artistic movements like "Arts and Crafts movement" Hippie movement of 1960s, allowed people to temporarily escape the modern world, but without much structure for building a life. Within Zionist settlement in Palestine, there was the Kibbutz movement, but which had becoming increasingly small and disillusioned in the late 20th century.
https://twitter.com/RichardHanania/status/1512939725513912323
Given the fact that the casing supposedly had "For the Children" written in Russian, that strongly suggests it may have been a deliberate false-flag.
https://www.moonofalabama.org/12i/ukrmissile2.jpg
We'll see whether our MSM picks up on any of this.Replies: @S, @utu, @Here Be Dragon, @Peripatetic Commenter
Yes.
I suppose that kind of evidence qualifies as irrefutable. Although a material proof is not even required here, because the truth can be determined through reasoning.
Meaning that to accept the idea that Russians might have done it, one ought to agree that their command is either intoxicated or insane.
Fortunately, water for innocent civilians has been restored: (1) The best answer is some sort of deal between Christian Ukraine and Christian Russia. Zelensky needs to stop taking advice from EU Elites. They do not have the best interests of the Ukrainian people at heart.
PEACE 😇
__________
(1) https://interfax.com/newsroom/top-stories/77505/Replies: @Mr. Hack
So, Ukraine reneged and started the flow of water from the Dnipro river to Crimea again. Sounds like an act of bad will, and a great reason to start shelling Ukrainian cities throughout Ukraine. Am I missing something here (why would you bring this up, if it seems to have been already resolved to everybody’s satisfaction?).
-- Why are you surprised that Russia protected the innocent? PEACE 😇
__________(1) https://interfax.com/newsroom/top-stories/77505/Replies: @Mr. Hack
Sweden has been officially neutral for over 200 years and it’s a policy that has served us well
Pointing to an Indian and calling him a Swede.
And “you” betrayed the Danes in 1864 and forsaked pan-Scandinavism.
I would say that you take you relativistic attitude too far. I can agree with it to a point. I actually don’t think that everyone should live like myself even if I appear to be a strong proponent. It’s not so much that I think everyone should live like me, but that I would like people to realize that it is even an option.
One of my spiritual teachers had a saying. ” We are not permitted to say that our way is the only way, but only that it is a good way.”
This being taken into account, I think it is still possible and necessary to attempt to distinguish between things which are good, and things which lack good. It is not an easy thing and I won’t pretend that my views on it are absolute. I’m sure that I, as is the case with us all, am wrong about a variety of things.
When one looks at the modern world it certainly appears that it is lacking for a great many people. I have a friend who worked in the health department of the local university. She said that about 60% of the student body was on some sort of psych medication or another, often times multiples. Anti-anxiety, anti-depressants etc. This blew me away, since these are people who haven’t even begun to deal with life as full fledged adults, and who represent an overwhelmingly affluent and privileged student body. This is just one small data point, but how can one look at a society which produces these outcomes and not see an issue?
Or lets go back to your previous point about all things originating from humans being natural. Can you really say that synthetic pesticides which kill the biome of the soil to such an extent that it becomes dead and inert can be considered “natural” or be worthy of non-judgment just because they exist?
The question that I would pose to you, is a t what point does absolute non-judgement become a form of moral cowardice?
But "judgement" itself is also a form of cowardice, though lesser than more obvious ways of lying to yourself.
Judgement stems from not "understanding." If you truly understand, you'll see how the other is unable to be any different at the moment. They are truly trying their best, even when they don't realise it, which is possible because eople are multi-layered, and they are often unacquainted with the deeper parts of themselves.
Having said this, a lack of understanding of "the other" is not enough to cause such judgement. The "judge" also needs to "suffer" from a surplus of "pride."
For example, I often don't understand why people are as they are, especially if I don't know them, but I appreciate that, because I don't know them, I have less information on them than they do, and so I am in too informationally limited a place to judge.
In other words, the courage of having humility also lessens judgement.
Another key point is that "pure love" is "understanding." Or perhaps pure understanding is love.
So while it is true that no one honest can claim to love everyone, as we are not God undivided, we can still accept the fact that without loving the other we are not in a place to judge and also accept that when we do love another, truly, in the moment, we necessarily do not judge them.
And of course, as with all these things, we can substitute our inner selves for "the other" and the words apply equally.
In fact, this attitude needs to be turned inwards first, for so many.
Continuing, this doesn't all mean that we can't say "good" and "bad", but it does mean that our preferences, our dislikes and likes are not to be confused with some moral objectivity. We should not speak in God's voice, though we can sing along with our own tune, should we be able to harmonise.
Furthermore, when using "good" and "bad" non-judgementally, which is with love, we are seeing the world from the the other's perspective as much as our own and are then trying to untangle their contradictions, rather than admonishing them. To point them in the direction of freedom from their fear, rather than forcing them along the road or telling them that it is hopeless and that they have failed.
For example, you can see my harsh comments in many places on this board, but I honestly believe, that even the harshest and seemingly most childish, come from a place of non-judgementalism.
They are instead to remind, or even shock, the people on the receiving end that they are caught in their own contradictions and that their self-judgement, which is usually what causes those contradictions to tangle up, is undermining their deeper needs.
And the only way you can know this of another is to take on their pain and feel it, as you can only truly know what you experience.
And so, by feeling it, no matter how abrasive the language, you are sharing in their problem and thereby making it your own as well. Which puts you in a place to suggest, even meanly, but never to judge, for you are there with them.
This is understanding and encouragement, and does not push distance with "the other" but makes an intimacy.
It also brings you back to yourself, for now you understand where you too are at, better, and will be more at peace.
I am not a relativist, even though I think morality is a simplistic semi-fiction.
Ultimately, morality is just people doing their best to try to understand and describe what is in their heart, but with much loss of truth, when it would be more accurate if they could simply see and follow their heart, but they cannot yet for they are gripped with fear.
Rather tragically this fear is often caused by the brokenness of morality when trying to describe truth, though it can also be because they have fear and no simple handrails of morality to guide them while they learn.
There is no easy answer for how people can arrive at truth and clear-sightedness, but all people will, in their own way. Every path will be individual, just as every individual is key to supporting others. This is not relativism. It is understanding, love and the beauty of existence. Doing your best is never "bad", even if it involves doing "bad." It is just yet another step on the path to "better," and everything would be very boring and uninformative if there was only "perfect" and no "better".
As we only know what we experience, so this world is valuable in its awfulness, its misery and its suffering. On a timescale of infinity, what really do these things matter, except we get to learn them? Even though they therefore matter infinitely, because we have the wondrous fulfillment of learning them!Replies: @silviosilver, @Barbarossa
https://tjournal.ru/opinions/570811-vladimir-yakovlev-o-4-glavnyh-metodah-specpropagandyReplies: @Wokechoke, @sher singh, @Coconuts, @Barbarossa
Wait a friggin’ gol’ darn minute! Where’s MY Mercedes?! I’ve been gypped I tell you, gypped!!
嗯,有可能。當年淞滬會戰在列強眼前跟日本人拼了,不惧鲸吞乃怕蚕食。今日在上海列強眼前使三十六計中苦肉計,以加速脫鉤。
Sure, there was a great enthusiasm for the new and modern in the early 20th century and many people were so taken by that promised utopia that they were willing to throw the baby out with the bath water. More often than not our modern world looks more like the imagined dystopias than the dreamed of utopias.
If you’ve never read E.M. Forsters’ short “When the Machine Stops” from 1908 give it a try and see if it doesn’t resemble the character of our modern world in uncanny ways. He wrote it in response to Wells’ technological utopianism.
My beef is not with all technology, but the uses it has often been put, many of which amount to being able to do stupid things faster. Perhaps it would be possible to have some of the advantages of modernity without all the unfortunate negatives. That would be a thought. Opportunities missed.
I somehow didn’t get a Mercedes either 🙂
German intelligence agencies probably try to use AI to monitor onboard microphones for security threats. Unless you have current vaxxed and boosted WUHAN-19 passport status, German vehicles refuse to start and you get to listen to a whiney prerecorded lecture from Angela Merkel and Greta Thunberg.
PEACE 😇
Yes... That is a joke. However, like the Babylon Bee, I fear I may have accidentally stumbled on an actual German enforcement effort.
You missed the facts provided in the earlier citation. Let me repeat the previously provided information: (1)
Russia intervened to stop Ukrainian war criminals engaged in collective punishment of Crimea’s civilian population.
— Why did Ukraine engage in this immoral behaviour?
— Why are you surprised that Russia protected the innocent?
PEACE 😇
__________
(1) https://interfax.com/newsroom/top-stories/77505/
The Ukrainian authorities cut off water to Crimea. Check your facts.
Probably for the best.
German intelligence agencies probably try to use AI to monitor onboard microphones for security threats. Unless you have current vaxxed and boosted WUHAN-19 passport status, German vehicles refuse to start and you get to listen to a whiney prerecorded lecture from Angela Merkel and Greta Thunberg.
PEACE 😇
Yes… That is a joke. However, like the Babylon Bee, I fear I may have accidentally stumbled on an actual German enforcement effort.
Time to whip out that get of out jail free card again. :)Replies: @AaronB
Silvio, I don’t think that’s correct.
I pointed out once that I thought Russia’s motives were thymotic, as a counterpoint to what seems to me the superficial idea that they were entirely practical, rationalistic considerations, which seemed ludicrous to me.
But I don’t remember saying thymotic motives are bad – that’s a typical modern idea that anything not practical and rational is “bad” 🙂 If anything, I was appreciative of the thymotic element in Russia’s motives. ***
However, just because something is thymotic doesn’t mean it’s moral, good, and just.
That’s a seperate question.
Thymotic just means you’re connected to your emotions, which is vital for your spiritual health and even, interestingly, to having more accurate cognitive impressions!
Modern Westerners are “devitalized” in large extent because they’re disconnected from their emotions.
How’s that for a get out of jail free card 🙂
**** On balance, my current assessment of Russian motives is that they stem much more from the typically modern mindset of control-freakery, paranoia that results from too much logical analysis, and a truly modern overvaluation of material strength and power and neglect – even contempt for – spiritual factors.
I won’t deny there is also a thymotic element in there of course, too.
The Boston Marathon banned Russians and Belorussians. Ridiculous.
They should have banned Chechens.
-- Why are you surprised that Russia protected the innocent? PEACE 😇
__________(1) https://interfax.com/newsroom/top-stories/77505/Replies: @Mr. Hack
This one, I admit, is a little bit tough to comment on for several reasons. On the one hand I can see why the Ukrainian authorities were not in any great hurry to provide a natural resource to Crimea, now run by a gang of thieves? The “plebicite” that was run there was certainly run quite hastily, at the point of a gun, and missing a whole bunch of neutral observers. In other words, the whole thing smelled of a sham. On the other hand, people need water to live.
I’m not sure how international law governs this kind of a situation? Water rights are governed by a whole hoste of laws here in the US and water gathered in the headlands of Colorado, can be diverted to all sorts of places before it makes its way to the ocean in California. People upstream seem to have greater rights as to control and distribution of this water…perhaps receive remuneration too. I’m not sure how it worked between greater Ukraine and the Crimea?…
There’s also the fact that Russian controlled Crimea received water from somewhere for 8 years, right? Was Ukraine under any obligation to continue the exact same relationship with Crimea, now that it had in effect changed its questionable orientation?
Letting the water in might well have been a good idea. A small back channel goodwill gesture showing you didn’t mean the Russians death by thirst.
Water under the bridge now. The Ruskies will kill every Ukie east of the Dneiper. That’s how it goes.
Did even one person die of thirst over the last 8 years in Crimea? Your comment is not only mendacious, but mean-spirited as well. 🙁
Wow, the decimation of the two parties that have dominated French politics over the last fifty years gathered pace in this presidential election, the Socialist Party – whose candidate (Hollande) was elected president only ten years ago – sitting on a measly 1.7% in the first round, and the mainstream right party (which has called itself many different names over the years) on 4.8%, less than “far right” Zemmour’s 7%.
That was unnecessarily verbose, evasive, and intentionally misleading. Let us return to the irrefutable fact:
Ukraine targeted civilians in Crimea for collective punishment.
The Ukrainian government intentionally created suffering by cutting off the civilian water supplies. Collective punishment is a crime.
Even if true, the statement “others did the same thing” is not valid as excuse or justification. If anything, it is a admission of guilt.
PEACE 😇
They should have banned Chechens.Replies: @AP, @Mikhail
The Russian ban would affect Chechens.
But, maybe, if they are running, then that makes it hard for them to carry bombs.Replies: @AP
I guess the most actually existing “return to tradition” are authentic 18th century lifestyles preserved by religious cult groups Amish and Haredim. Perhaps there is also the artificial recreation of medieval world attempted in Salafi Islam.
With Mormons of Utah, you could enter a kind of alternative futuristic belief system (where you are supposed to be aliens from planet Kolob), but with its own more traditional social life, and religious settlers in the West Bank are half-imagining they live in Biblical times and follow traditional rules.
In ancient Greece, there was concept of return to nature or reason in stoical schools of philosophy. You could also go to the “garden” of the philosopher Epicurus ( https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10902-006-9036-z ), which focused on minimalism and simplicity of lifestyle.
In medieval times, for radically simplifying life, we had the institution of monasteries and convents. Although they were most times probably really living more luxurious than majority of people who were in the peasant population.
In early 20th century secular world, there are all kinds of artistic and bohemian movements, but not so many real transformations of lifestyle. These artistic movements like “Arts and Crafts movement”
Hippie movement of 1960s, allowed people to temporarily escape the modern world, but without much structure for building a life. Within Zionist settlement in Palestine, there was the Kibbutz movement, but which had becoming increasingly small and disillusioned in the late 20th century.
LOL. Actually, I meant ethnic Chechens, not nationals, as there are over 100,000 outside, and they might be the worst ones.
But, maybe, if they are running, then that makes it hard for them to carry bombs.
https://www.sott.net/article/466340-Is-it-possible-to-actually-know-what-has-been-and-is-going-on-in-Ukraine
https://www.newsweek.com/putins-bombers-could-devastate-ukraine-hes-holding-back-heres-why-1690494
We know about the basis to level Hiroshima, Nagasaki and Dresden, which is why I'm reluctant to do cartwheels on war. Clint Ehrlich's Twitter feed has plenty of photo and video evidence showing Kiev regime forces taking the use of civilians to another level.Replies: @AP
Some things so obvious even you can’t deny them.
False.
According to UN, there have been about 1,800 documented civilians killed in Ukraine (real number is higher because not all the dead have been found, it’s probably at least 2,500 at minimum, more likely 3,000-4,000).
https://ukraine.un.org/en/177284-ukraine-civilian-casualties-9-april-2022
Estimates of umber of civilians killed in Afghan invasion form October to December 2001 ranges from 1,500 to 2,400:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_invasion_of_Afghanistan
Iraq was more bloody for civilians, but not by much. Estimates of civilian deaths form the Iraq invasion range from 3,200 to 7,300:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_invasion_of_Afghanistan
Of course, these numbers occurred when America managed to seize all of Iraq. Russia has killed around 2,000 Ukrainian civilians (at least) despite only grabbing some peripheral areas. Per population of area seized, Russia is far deadlier to Ukrainian civilians than the USA was to Afghans and Iraqis, not even close.
Putin kills Slavs more than Anglos kill Arabs and Afghanis. Remember that.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1tihL1lMLL0
Once again noting thew Kiev regime culpability in killing 10,000 mostly civilians over the past eight years and before the Russian attack.
In WW II, the US killing more Japanese civilians than Japan killing US civilians didn't make Japan ethically superior.Replies: @AP
But, maybe, if they are running, then that makes it hard for them to carry bombs.Replies: @AP
Banning Russians could be a convenient way of keeping Chechens out of the country without formally banning them.
Wiping Ukraine off the east side of the Dneiper is just a matter of degree different from cutting off water to a whole region. At least the fleeing Ukies can drink some of that H2O as they run.
Russia, in the other hand, attacked with the full confidence of an overwhelmingly superior modernized army, which affirms the basic mythos of modernity.
Moreover, the Russian expectation of a quick Ukrainian collapse is an indication of the Russian value system - they seem genuinely shocked that anyone can not prioritize survival, and not bow to superior power.
It's so un-modern.
In this it is no different than the West, or China.
As for where are we going forward in the West (and the world)?
Obviously and as you correctly see, there simply is no solution from within the current paradigm.
All the options of the current paradigm have been exhausted, and we are just doing over and over what doesn't work. The current paradigm is logic and analysis and control, just more and more of it.
What is happening now though is the steady buildup of stresses and collapses within the current paradigm, which will ultimately lead to it's widespread collapse, which will include China and Russia and the whole world.Replies: @silviosilver, @Dmitry, @Beckow
It’s not they don’t prioritize survival, but rather they had better intelligence, or were not so gullible to propaganda as we (unknowledgeable amateur netizens) can be.
The last war was in October 2020, between Azerbaijan and Armenia (or Armenia supported separatist army). Lesson for anyone watching this war, was that Armenia should have surrendered after a couple of days, as there was irreconcilable difference of power.
Armenia was using a 1970s army, while Azerbaijan had equipment from the early 21st century.
Around the world, people watched this war, and have the same conclusion. They then (especially amateur netizens, but also apparently US intelligence) naively generalize this to Ukraine vs. Russia, believing that Russia might have modernized its military like Azerbaijan.
But the Ukrainians have been studying this for 8 years and they would know the Russian army was not modernized. Excluding a few cruise missiles against fixed targets, it would be a battle of the Soviet armies, with the 1970s/1980s technology.
Ukraine’s situation was then rational (except things like their delay in mobilization of reservists). The irrationality more from the other side, based in believing your own marketing, while Instagram showed a lot of managers drinking champagne in Monaco.
Here is the famous photos of the Orlan 10 drone from today after Ukrainians captured. This drone cost up to $120,000 for a whole a system with launchers, in terms of cost paid by the Russian army.
Most of the components are from a Japanese toy model shop.
Its engine is bought the Japanese toy shop for $1000. https://www.okmodel.net/saito-fg-40-40cc--gasoline-engine-for-airplanes-fg-40

Its camera is quite a good Canon SLR.
This is the main drone of the Russian army, which has a lot of television reports about this technology.
But it’s made of foreign consumer goods and toy components, something you can make in the garage if you have skills. Someone has overpaid.
Some of the Ukrainian units, may have training in their tactics from the British army. (British army is considered the most elite and modern army)
Ukraine also has received in the last months, some light weapons like NLAW (made in Sweden) and Starstreak (made in Great Britain). This is access to more modern technology in these areas, than the Russian army. Ukraine also has thousands of Javelin anti-tank missiles. It has some laser guided mortars.
They also have some successful indigenous technology. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skif_(ATGM) It’s not Warsaw Uprsing, let alone Warsaw Ghetto Uprising.
Ukraine has very little air force, but the Russian air force doesn’t have targeting pods – it can only attack fixed targets. Reality of ground forces have been more balanced than expected.
You are correct that with self restraint it is possible to avoid certain unpleasant and socially destructive outcomes of the modern world. You also it on an important fact when you mention that in the pre-industrial world this self restraint was imposed by physical limitations.
The problem as it appears to me is this. By and large people will under no circumstances self moderate. It would be nice to believe that they will and can be capable of it with a few sociological tweaks, but the actual human experience points to the opposite conclusion.
There are some people who may be able to self moderate or impose limiting factors on themselves. I do this in a few ways, one of which is refusing to own a smart phone. I personally find the allure of so many interesting articles and opinions on the internet to be a temptation which would siphon off an unacceptable amount of time better spent actually doing things. I don’t trust myself to not be the person who reflexively whips out their cell phone every time they have a spare 30 seconds.
By in general it is hard to put into action a cohesive plan of limitation without a coherent social group which believes similarly. The modern technologies of the automobile and mass communication have erased or weakened to the point of symbol most of these organic groupings, and those same technologies make the forming of new groups difficult. These groupings took a long time to form and cannot be wished into existence.
So, I believe that humans require hard limitations imposed if they are to behave in any way but radical self indulgence. It might be tempting to say that government should step in to provide that, but that is a solution which usually is only a veiled attempt to enrich one group at the expense of another, or to impose an arbitrary set of priorities from one megalomaniac (like the destructive madness of the Soviet system). The format of the natural world providing that ceiling of limitations is probably the best as it then sets the stage for the flowering of a variety of human cultures in an organic manner. This process has generally resulted in what we like to call “culture” in all it’s idiosyncratic wonder.
Ukraine has very little air force, but the Russian air force doesn't have targeting pods - it can only attack fixed targets. Reality of ground forces have been more balanced than expected.Replies: @AaronB, @Wokechoke, @AP
I think you are “retrofitting” a narrative to the facts.
Nearly all the worlds intelligence agencies and “experts” were wrong about Russian power.
And despite the shoddy state of the Russian military, it is still in absolute terms much more powerful than that of Ukraine.
It’s impossible to make the Ukrainian will to fight and act of calculated rationality.
Ukraine has very little air force, but the Russian air force doesn't have targeting pods - it can only attack fixed targets. Reality of ground forces have been more balanced than expected.Replies: @AaronB, @Wokechoke, @AP
Saw a rather funny video, well no not funny, but it was a Ukrainian army check point, a dozen Ukies by a berm and a barrier in the forest. A tank trundles up the road and they ignore it. The tank shoots the main gun at them. Kills them all. The video recording guy runs like fuck and you hear a second shot. The tank was a Russian capture of a Ukie tank. It’s a confusing as fuck war.
The problem as it appears to me is this. By and large people will under no circumstances self moderate. It would be nice to believe that they will and can be capable of it with a few sociological tweaks, but the actual human experience points to the opposite conclusion.
There are some people who may be able to self moderate or impose limiting factors on themselves. I do this in a few ways, one of which is refusing to own a smart phone. I personally find the allure of so many interesting articles and opinions on the internet to be a temptation which would siphon off an unacceptable amount of time better spent actually doing things. I don't trust myself to not be the person who reflexively whips out their cell phone every time they have a spare 30 seconds.
By in general it is hard to put into action a cohesive plan of limitation without a coherent social group which believes similarly. The modern technologies of the automobile and mass communication have erased or weakened to the point of symbol most of these organic groupings, and those same technologies make the forming of new groups difficult. These groupings took a long time to form and cannot be wished into existence.
So, I believe that humans require hard limitations imposed if they are to behave in any way but radical self indulgence. It might be tempting to say that government should step in to provide that, but that is a solution which usually is only a veiled attempt to enrich one group at the expense of another, or to impose an arbitrary set of priorities from one megalomaniac (like the destructive madness of the Soviet system). The format of the natural world providing that ceiling of limitations is probably the best as it then sets the stage for the flowering of a variety of human cultures in an organic manner. This process has generally resulted in what we like to call "culture" in all it's idiosyncratic wonder.Replies: @AaronB
An author who articulates a vision beyond modernity that I like, Charles Eisenstein, says that “belief is a social fact”.
That’s a bit too stark, and he explains that he simply means that our ability to sustain a trans-modern view of life is heavily influenced by other people sharing our values and views.
Social network is extremely important. The fantasy that we are individualists is just a modernist fantasy.
It’s extremely difficult to sustain an attitude that flys in the face of the overwhelming mainstream consensus, when you are alone.
It’s possible, but it involves lots of backsliding and clawing your back to a better vision and lots of effort to go against the grain. It’s a real spiritual struggle.
My own journey was very difficult, and only recently do I feel truly “planted” in my new attitude, such that even though I know attacks and attempts at delegitimization will come, and immense social pressure will be brought, I’m confident that I can weather all these forces. They no longer seem so serious.
I’m sure modernity is a calamity, now.
But those who of us who have weathered this journey, I feel, must help those who are taking their first steps upon it, and give them courage and strength.
They should have banned Chechens.Replies: @AP, @Mikhail
I jumped the agree button too soon. I’ve never been one for collective guilt. For whatever it’s worth, I let the Boston AA know the hypocritical absurdity of their decision.
That must be an unprecedented ratio. And the ones in France seem to be in shooting wars with other migrants (Maybe, they have their reasons?) But, personally, I think it was a colossal mistake to let them in. The "refugees" were probably mostly radical revolutionaries, with violent tendencies.
And Chechnya is full of all these defensive towers. If the idea that central authority reduced violent tendencies in Europe, over hundreds of years, because of public executions is right, then well, I don't think it happened in Chechnya.
Anyway, it is enough on the edge of Europe, and culturally different enough that I don't think it is a compatible society, and I don't think we need to welcome them. (As is true for many)Replies: @Mikhail
What about this event in the beginning of the war, which had a famous video of the killing?
It could be friendly fire, which seems very possible IMO. It could also be Russian special forces in the second day “thunder runs”. Maybe in a few years, historians will investigate.
https://twitter.com/UAWeapons/status/1497217758051717123
You can read our comments in our forum in February 26 or February 27. War begins on February 24.
In February 26, we saw everything was going wrong. But I still said I thought Russian army would be able to occupy main cities.
In February 27 (https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-177-continuing-russia-ukraine-war/#comment-5199415), I know the Russian army is not modernized and this war will fail, which is later than some other amateur netizens.
AP (who is probably even more amateur netizen than myself, if this is possible), has intuition that the Russian army is not modernized already in February 20. Although he doesn’t expect full invasion.
You can see what he said then https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-175/#comment-5181184
In February 21, he is already saying the soldiers will be badly trained. https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-175/#comment-5187699 (Although he had some strange optimism that cities would not be bombed).
Of the course, the Ukrainian authorities, have much more knowledge than some bored office workers like us. So, they would have known this stuff before war begins, while our information is effected more by propaganda.
I would guess part of America’s expert community has self-interest to hype modernization of potential opponent armies, as it supports the domestic military-industrial complex (if the opponent is modernizing, then you need to order more equipment), and also support their own job within thinktanks. If they said “don’t worry”, we should invest our money in building infrastructure or healthcare at home, they might not be too popular with their sponsor.
This is what I wrote February 17th, before the war: Meanwhile the pro-Russians were insisting that Ukraine would fall within days, mass surrender, elite mass flight, etc.
My mistake was that I assumed that the people in charge of Russia knew as much as even I knew and therefore would not choose to start this stupid and bloody adventure. All I know is the Ukrainian people and people in Ukraine. One would think tat Russians would have sufficient intelligence in Ukraine to know the same thing. but I guess they foolishly believed their own myths about Ukraine not being a real country, the people pining for reunion with their comparatively rich Russian brothers, etc.Replies: @Wokechoke, @utu
Looks like Brandenbergers!
You do realise that the Russians will just kill everyone in Nikolaev? It’s not about occupation. I also thought that Kharkov will become a little like Donetsk today. The Russians will keep it in artillery range and build a defended embankment around it shielding those Murovsky Trail ridge lines. Turn Kharkov into a ghost town frontier garrison. Once Donetsk is free from siege lines and the militias push back the UA and do the Kesselschlact at Kramatorsk, Kharkov will just die. Uninhabitable but for garrison troops.
-Mick Ryan (retired Major General of the Australian Army) is writing.https://twitter.com/WarintheFuture/status/1511874282199998473
https://twitter.com/WarintheFuture/status/1511874303419060228
Dmitry, I thought you specifically were going on about how the Ukrainians would fold in the face of superior Russian power and especially the really scary Chechens 🙂
I actually was pretty impressed that after the invasion you acknowledged facts and changed your tune, I thought that was commendable intellectual integrity.
But this retrofitting now doesn’t seem right to me.
Anyways, I am in danger of getting sucked into an endless political discussion, which I really don’t want to do – my ego and lower emotions will just get sucked in 🙂
So I have to bow out of this convo unfortunately. I’ve made my position on Ukraine more or less clear, which is all I can really do.
Cheers.
Turns out they now have the technological edge over Russia's 1970s and 1980s throwback army.
I guess there's such a fine line between those two scenarios that we shouldn't fault someone for being thrown off by the ambiguities.
What's more, this is why I don't make predictions, and I never will! :)Replies: @Dmitry
I read people speculating the question will be whether the next stage of war will be more like campaigns of the Second World War or First World War.
–
Mick Ryan (retired Major General of the Australian Army) is writing.
If I had to describe this war in one picture it’s this:
I just hope Russia remembers we Canadians don’t have a real military. It’s called “Green Welfare” here for obvious reasons. Pajeets & hicks love welfare which is the bulk of the military, I guess better to pay them to sit in some remote cabin than to watch them commit crime and care for them in prison (because prisons are filled with petty-crime and fraudster pajeets, drug dealing and wife-beating hicks AND natives who see it as a free bed and breakfast with a chance to get their high school diploma ‘con college’).
According to UN, there have been about 1,800 documented civilians killed in Ukraine (real number is higher because not all the dead have been found, it's probably at least 2,500 at minimum, more likely 3,000-4,000).
https://ukraine.un.org/en/177284-ukraine-civilian-casualties-9-april-2022
Estimates of umber of civilians killed in Afghan invasion form October to December 2001 ranges from 1,500 to 2,400:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_invasion_of_Afghanistan
Iraq was more bloody for civilians, but not by much. Estimates of civilian deaths form the Iraq invasion range from 3,200 to 7,300:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_invasion_of_Afghanistan
Of course, these numbers occurred when America managed to seize all of Iraq. Russia has killed around 2,000 Ukrainian civilians (at least) despite only grabbing some peripheral areas. Per population of area seized, Russia is far deadlier to Ukrainian civilians than the USA was to Afghans and Iraqis, not even close.
Putin kills Slavs more than Anglos kill Arabs and Afghanis. Remember that.Replies: @Mikhail
There’re other stats noting differently, thereby explaining this sequence:
Once again noting thew Kiev regime culpability in killing 10,000 mostly civilians over the past eight years and before the Russian attack.
In WW II, the US killing more Japanese civilians than Japan killing US civilians didn’t make Japan ethically superior.
Officially, Russia’s invasion has now produced more than half of the civilian deaths in 7 weeks as had happened in Donbas in 8 years (once numbers are counted this toll will probably be equal).Replies: @Mikhail
https://twitter.com/RichardHanania/status/1512939725513912323
Given the fact that the casing supposedly had "For the Children" written in Russian, that strongly suggests it may have been a deliberate false-flag.
https://www.moonofalabama.org/12i/ukrmissile2.jpg
We'll see whether our MSM picks up on any of this.Replies: @S, @utu, @Here Be Dragon, @Peripatetic Commenter
Those evil Russians infiltrated a Ukrainian base so they could fire a Ukrainian missile on Ukrainian citizens and blame it on Russians so everyone can see how bad the Ukrainians are.
You can’t trust Russians!
Russian soldiers destroyed by a Ukrainian tank up close.
Oh, wait. I have that the wrong way around like much of the MSM has the situation in Ukraine.
https://twitter.com/MapsUkraine/status/1513285241858834449
CNN shies away from Kiev regime lies and instances like when key Ukrainian personnel are sacked and in the case of a negotiator killed.
I’ve pointed this out before, but when the Tsaernev’s set their bombs, there were only about 100 Chechens in America. And their sister made bomb threats or something.
That must be an unprecedented ratio. And the ones in France seem to be in shooting wars with other migrants (Maybe, they have their reasons?) But, personally, I think it was a colossal mistake to let them in. The “refugees” were probably mostly radical revolutionaries, with violent tendencies.
And Chechnya is full of all these defensive towers. If the idea that central authority reduced violent tendencies in Europe, over hundreds of years, because of public executions is right, then well, I don’t think it happened in Chechnya.
Anyway, it is enough on the edge of Europe, and culturally different enough that I don’t think it is a compatible society, and I don’t think we need to welcome them. (As is true for many)
Excerpt - Let's see how things play out.
What do Russians call a “UFO?” Is it the same sounds or word?
The Chinese seem to say “UFO”, which would make it really interesting if Russians did as well.
I think I made some comment before, how I considered UFOs to be a special American pseudo-religion. And maybe it would bear that out, if the terminology was the same in all the world’s largest countries.
Vallee's is not horrible. The other three are horrible. As in I am very interested in this topic and I could not finish watching them. Well my gut reaction was more like disgust but that is sort of my default reaction so not as informative a word.
'Have you ever thought about the victims of UFO incidents? Have you ever considered their parents, brothers, sisters? What do we tell them? They can never know the truth!'
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/UFO_(TV_series)
The image is telling. Please take a look. It even feeds into your interests in the admissions at colleges given the White/Yellow/Black image in the museum diorama. The diorama pulls punches tbh if you read the trial transcripts.Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @nickels
Black American soldiers raped numerous french women in ww 2 as well.
Its in their nature.
Russia has successfully made Caucasoids the most patriotic group in the country after fighting vicious wars to subjugate them. A stunning example of successful ethnic assimilation. Perhaps this partly explains Karlin’s own gung-ho support for this war given that he’s a mixed-race Caucasoid?
https://twitter.com/ArtyomLukin/status/1513139332999442437
War is a force that gives us meaning, after all.
There is a more cynical reading, namely that Russia is using minorities as cannon fodder to shield ethnic Russian families from the fallout, so as to maintain Putin’s popularity. But Caucasoids don’t seem to mind being cannon fodder, and Chechens, Dagestanis and Laks are proudly playing their part without complaints. So their hyperpatriotism is real.
Also, Chechens are confirmed on the Ukrainian side too, except they seem to be doing actual fighting, as opposed to posing for Kadyrov's instagram. Recently there was a 'leaked' x-ray photo of one of Ramzan's many 'enemies' with a beer-bottle shoved completely up his rectum.Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Dmitry
But, with the subsidies, i don't think they are cheap soldiers. Russia would probably be better off spending the money on drones.Replies: @sudden death
https://gazetaingush.ru/news/gorzhus-tem-chto-ya-chast-moguchego-silnogo-mnogonacionalnogo-naroda-rossii-putinReplies: @Thulean Friend
That must be an unprecedented ratio. And the ones in France seem to be in shooting wars with other migrants (Maybe, they have their reasons?) But, personally, I think it was a colossal mistake to let them in. The "refugees" were probably mostly radical revolutionaries, with violent tendencies.
And Chechnya is full of all these defensive towers. If the idea that central authority reduced violent tendencies in Europe, over hundreds of years, because of public executions is right, then well, I don't think it happened in Chechnya.
Anyway, it is enough on the edge of Europe, and culturally different enough that I don't think it is a compatible society, and I don't think we need to welcome them. (As is true for many)Replies: @Mikhail
https://www.eurasiareview.com/04042022-handicapping-ukraine-and-russia-west-differences-oped/
Excerpt –
Let’s see how things play out.
A whataboutism notes that certain groups in the US have been attracted to serving in the military.
No, actually my response was measured, right on the mark and not at all misleading. Your inability to respond appropriately to any of my points, or just plainly unable to do so, is not my fault but solely your own.
I’ll use the very same retort that I used with Wokechoke:
Did even one person die of thirst over the last 8 years in Crimea?
If not, then the current retribution meted out against innocent Ukrainian civilians is inappropriate and doesn’t fulfill any legal definition of being an equal quid pro quo.
The citizens of Crimea should have thought things through more closely before they decided to leave the Ukrainian state. Ukraine was under no obligation to maintain the same relationship as before the seceeding of Crimea. Obviously, these things would have been discussed more fully if the “plebiscite” had been conducted in a more normal fashion, rather than in the quick manner that it was done, at the point of a gun.
I never wrote anything of the sort. If you’re alluding to the fact that water rights are a complex legal area that regulate the manner in which different states gain access to water, then I was only pointing out a fact. It looks that this is an inconvenient fact that you’d just as soon forget.
Would a 100% blood free blockade of Ukraine's ports be "acceptable" under the MrHack definition? After all such a situation precisely fills your exact logical test, Not one person would die of thirst over 8 years in Ukraine.
PEACE 😇Replies: @Mr. Hack
Oh, wait. I have that the wrong way around like much of the MSM has the situation in Ukraine.
https://twitter.com/MapsUkraine/status/1513285241858834449Replies: @Mikhail
On the other hand, there’s the BS world of CNN headlines like Due to Poor Military Performance, Putin Promotes a New Russian General with a Bloody Past and Putin Lies About Nazis in Ukraine.
CNN shies away from Kiev regime lies and instances like when key Ukrainian personnel are sacked and in the case of a negotiator killed.
I recall that you once mentioned that somebody from some intelligence service once gave you a call. You weren’t really very explicit about the how’s and why’s about the whole situation, and I decided not to pursue anything any further. Now, you mention two visits and bring it up as some sort of badge of honor or an accomplishment that you’d want to include on a resume? You’re a strange one Mickey – I’d suggest that if you don’t want to write about these two experiences, you not keep bringing them up.
The use of this ideological technology by the RF could be interesting to a number of groups:
– The Classical Liberals and ‘old school’ left wingers who have been arguing that CRT and the post- modern Social Justice stuff lends itself to justifying division and violence.
– All those further to right who reject it as being one of the Liberal elite’s worst recent ideological creations (as well as racists, there would be all sorts of other conservatives in this group).
It’s a interesting example of the way Russian elites attempt to copy, then try to one-up on, elite Western ideology when it is useful to them.
Thanks for that, I found another interview with Russell on Youtube a while ago, from around the same time period but with an American interviewer. He always has some interesting things to say.
I remember there is a George Orwell novel ‘Coming up For Air’ that deals with a similar theme in depth, Betjeman used to frequently talk about it as well, the growing ugliness of the English landscape, of modern architecture and so on. It must have been something noticeable for people born in the 19th century/turn of the 20th century.
Though you can appreciate it in some ways looking at old photos and walking around, I remember standing on the foundations of a demolished stately home on a hill in County Durham looking at the vista, you could imagine how it would have looked from an upper storey window before industry appeared and modern buildings to change the landscape, impressive.
The folks overthrowing Ukraine’s democratically president should’ve considered the ramifications of their manner.
The very last point is pure projection on your part. The FBI reference concerns this feeble minded salvo from you which I addressed:
https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-184-russia-ukraine/#comment-5282749
Fake news?
Russia says it obliterated ‘Europe-supplied’ S-300 launchers
https://www.rt.com/russia/553662-s300-missiles-ukraine-slovakia/
Assimilation? Chechnya was assimilated, before the USSR collapsed. Many Chechens rose to high positions. Khasbulatov was one of the most prominent patriots who stood with Rutskoy against Yeltsin’s kleptocratic mafia firesale of the country. Russia ended up (it could have gone differently) with the political culture it has today because of Western indifference, when people like Staroivotova (iirc) tried to appeal to places like Germany when Yeltsin was besieging the white house, the response was simply ‘Russia is not Germany’.
Anyway, the only way for Russia was able to reintegrate Chechnya after 1994 was have the Ramzan Kadyrov (after his father Ahmed snitched on everyone he could, he was succeeded by his idiot son who spends all his time on social media) [mis]govern the region as a autonomous police state, entirely governed by personal rule. There was sporadic guerilla warfare against the Kadyrovs until the early 2010s. Vast numbers of Chechens still hate and despise Kadyrov. Even other caucasian regions see Chechnya as a semi-closed shithole to avoid, few years ago went out with an Ossetian, I heard plenty enough anecdotes.
Also, Chechens are confirmed on the Ukrainian side too, except they seem to be doing actual fighting, as opposed to posing for Kadyrov’s instagram. Recently there was a ‘leaked’ x-ray photo of one of Ramzan’s many ‘enemies’ with a beer-bottle shoved completely up his rectum.
I’ve seen it before. It shows that Ukrainians are different from Russians genetically in the sense that they are basically Europeans, like their Polish neighbors, while Russians are a melting pot in which many Russians are also close to Poles and Ukrainians but many more have varying degrees of Finnic and sometimes even Asian descent. The analogy I suppose would be to the white Americans vs. people in England. There are many British Americans within the white American population but also many with mixed Italian, German etc. descent vs. “pure” single-ancestry English (I know analogy isn’t perfect as the English themselves are mixed Celts and Germanics). Genetically, Russia is a melting pot imperial alternative to the “pure” Ukrainian nation-state as is the USA vs. England.
If course, the cultural differences are greater than genetic versus USA and England. The latter gave only been apart for 250 years and didn’t have massive external influence.
It’s cooled down a lot of the sillier attempts to find an exotic anterior ethnic hat to hang an identity upon.
The main difference cumulatively between Russia and Ukraine is that a Russians have Finnish mixture in Karelia and Ukrainians have Greek/Anatolian traces in some southern and western areas. The mass of people are the same stock though.
One is more Scandie and other more Med.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1tihL1lMLL0
Once again noting thew Kiev regime culpability in killing 10,000 mostly civilians over the past eight years and before the Russian attack.
In WW II, the US killing more Japanese civilians than Japan killing US civilians didn't make Japan ethically superior.Replies: @AP
Again, according to the UN it was 10,000 military deaths and 3,400 civilian deaths in Donbas. 3,000 of those 3,400 happened in 2014-2015 when the war was hot.
Officially, Russia’s invasion has now produced more than half of the civilian deaths in 7 weeks as had happened in Donbas in 8 years (once numbers are counted this toll will probably be equal).
https://twitter.com/aaronjmate/status/1496308793810034688
https://nationalinterest.org/feature/will-tensions-ukraine-boil-over-200725
The refugee numbers from that area to Russia numbering around one million, since 2014, along with about another one million leaving Ukraine to Russia (since the so-called Orange Revolution) over the past and not including reunified Crimea.Replies: @AP
The result of most of these Americans taking their genetic tests, many of the self identifying Germans and Irish find out they are genetically sorted as British or British Isles. This makes sense because for more than two centuries the founding stock was English. Everyone else went into that larger DNA pot.you migh have a German patronymic but the DNA is already submerged with the Anglos. Germans are split between Slav and Western European markers anyway. A fault line on the clines.
It’s cooled down a lot of the sillier attempts to find an exotic anterior ethnic hat to hang an identity upon.
The main difference cumulatively between Russia and Ukraine is that a Russians have Finnish mixture in Karelia and Ukrainians have Greek/Anatolian traces in some southern and western areas. The mass of people are the same stock though.
This map shows to the genetic differences in Europe. Shows dominant haplogroups but not the finer variations in one country or another.

The Russians genetically matched with Ukraine. The variation is that the Ukies have Anatolian and Greek admixture while the Russians are blended with Finns in Kola and Karelia and the old Novgorod Republic.
One is more Scandie and other more Med.
Did you read what I said about economic counter-warfare?
Is it meant to cause inflation in the US? Or soft-decouple? Or target Shanghai University students and other potential political undesirables?
I'd like to think that it was something 4D, rather than Covid hysteria. But is Shanghai as integrated into the global economy, as the Pearl Delta? Maybe, targeting the Pearl would hurt Russia?Replies: @Yellowface Anon
Thanks for the reminder.
This is what I wrote February 17th, before the war:
Meanwhile the pro-Russians were insisting that Ukraine would fall within days, mass surrender, elite mass flight, etc.
My mistake was that I assumed that the people in charge of Russia knew as much as even I knew and therefore would not choose to start this stupid and bloody adventure. All I know is the Ukrainian people and people in Ukraine. One would think tat Russians would have sufficient intelligence in Ukraine to know the same thing. but I guess they foolishly believed their own myths about Ukraine not being a real country, the people pining for reunion with their comparatively rich Russian brothers, etc.
The Muravsky Trail is good tank country though. kramatorsk looks terribly vulnerable.
Ron Unz was strongly pushing (1) (indomitable hypersonic Putin Wuderwaffe) and (2) ( just NYT and WaPo propaganda as Putin would never invade) while Karlin was pushing (1) only.
The alleged surprise in Germany when Russia eventually attacked, that Germany allegedly did not believe British and American intelligence finding is a total BS. That Germany's intelligence chief was caught by war in Kiev is a nice touch to legitimize that BS. Actually what was he doing there: telling Zelensky to surrender? Germany knew just as America knew that Russia would attack but unlike America Germany hoped that the spiel about the indomitable army of Putin was true and that there would be new pro-Russian government in Kiev in 48 hours. Germany gave Putin green light for the Anschluss of Ukraine hoping that it would be over soon and after some display of indignations in media and by politicians the business with Russia would return to normal. Germany was doing everything to not arm Ukraine and make Ukraine easier to be swallowed by the "indomitable Putin army".
Germany did not allow RAF plane with arms to Ukraine fly over its territory. (Jan 18, 2022) It took 5 weeks of war for Germany to grant approval for transfer of armored personnel vehicles by Czech Republic to Ukraine Expect more shenanigans and obstructions from Germany because they are not done and had not given up on Russia.Replies: @silviosilver, @A123, @Emil Nikola Richard, @RadicalCenter
Ukraine has very little air force, but the Russian air force doesn't have targeting pods - it can only attack fixed targets. Reality of ground forces have been more balanced than expected.Replies: @AaronB, @Wokechoke, @AP
You are not a military expert (I am even less of a military expert than you) but you are very intelligent and so you make interesting comments. One minor disagreement:
On the level of infantry, Ukraine seems to be running a 21st century army with the latest weapons (including as you noted the native Ukrainian-made Stugna which seems comparable to NLAW or Javelins) and in close integration with drones.
I guess one can conclude that in this war we have Russia and its larger 1980s Soviet military (with a few 21st century toys such as cruise missiles) versus a smaller army with 21st century infantry and small 1980s navy (now destroyed), 1980s air force and 1980s air defenses (now degraded).
Ukraine also produces laser guided artillery shells (https://ukroboronprom.com.ua/en/product/kvitnik). They modify the laser aimer on the consumer drones, and this use of the consumer drones then guides some artillery attacks. It is 21st century, but many are improvised 21st century consumer products. Not like Azerbaijan, had the most expensive hi-tech drones, and which have years of integrating them. To write pedantically, Kalibr cruise missiles are really toys of 1980s Sverdlovsk. They were designed under Lev Lyulyev (he was born in 1908 in Kiev), as a possible nuclear delivery system. Soviet Union designed and tested in 1983. In the 1990s, there was not finance available to complete the project, integrate them or attain their entry to service, so they were not available in the Chechen Wars. They use satellite navigation and are used against fixed targets. So (unlike loitering drones) you need to know already what the target is, before you use them, and of course they are very expensive (they were originally developed for tactical nuclear warheads).Replies: @Jake1
The Chinese seem to say "UFO", which would make it really interesting if Russians did as well.
I think I made some comment before, how I considered UFOs to be a special American pseudo-religion. And maybe it would bear that out, if the terminology was the same in all the world's largest countries.Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @S
Rice U has their UFO conference on youtube in its entirety. Plenary talks by Jacques Vallee, Diane Pasulka, Leslie Kean, Whitley Strieber.
Vallee’s is not horrible. The other three are horrible. As in I am very interested in this topic and I could not finish watching them. Well my gut reaction was more like disgust but that is sort of my default reaction so not as informative a word.
Your attempt to raise water complexity is an diversion. Trying to drag the Colorado River, U.S. legal case into the discussion is pure misdirection.
Are you sure you want to take that stance? Let us logically convert your case to a general rule. “An action is ‘not a war crime’ if the targeted civilians find workarounds to survive.”
Would a 100% blood free blockade of Ukraine’s ports be “acceptable” under the MrHack definition? After all such a situation precisely fills your exact logical test, Not one person would die of thirst over 8 years in Ukraine.
PEACE 😇
The lighter low profile Russian style tank makes sense in these swampy areas with bad bridges and poor roads. The Abrams Leopard and Challenger might not even be able to traverse some of these terrains I’m seeing in Ukraine. Bridges might crumble.
They did. By thinking things through they got rid of a gold plated, toilet polishing criminal that had been robbing his country blind for many years. That, and getting rid of Putler’s minions in Ukraine are the two greatest things that they’ll do to ensure that they’re moving in the right direction.
Here’s a video showing Yanukovych ingloriously fleeing Ukraine, absconding with his ill gained money and goods. Nobody but Mike Averko is still shedding big crocodile tears for Yanukovych. Even his “loyal” fellow party mates all turned on their master at the end and sighed a big cry of relief when the petty thug fled Ukraine to Putler’s Russia. Buck up Mickey, Yanukovych is doing fine in Russia. Are you sure that it was intelligence agents that have paid you several visits lately and not medical personnel from the closest funny farm, Mickey? 🙂
Also, Chechens are confirmed on the Ukrainian side too, except they seem to be doing actual fighting, as opposed to posing for Kadyrov's instagram. Recently there was a 'leaked' x-ray photo of one of Ramzan's many 'enemies' with a beer-bottle shoved completely up his rectum.Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Dmitry
https://www.tripadvisor.com/Tourism-g494956-Chechnya_North_Caucasian_District-Vacations.html
This is what I wrote February 17th, before the war: Meanwhile the pro-Russians were insisting that Ukraine would fall within days, mass surrender, elite mass flight, etc.
My mistake was that I assumed that the people in charge of Russia knew as much as even I knew and therefore would not choose to start this stupid and bloody adventure. All I know is the Ukrainian people and people in Ukraine. One would think tat Russians would have sufficient intelligence in Ukraine to know the same thing. but I guess they foolishly believed their own myths about Ukraine not being a real country, the people pining for reunion with their comparatively rich Russian brothers, etc.Replies: @Wokechoke, @utu
The Pripyat marshes are good forested guerilla terrain? That’s news to me. Lol.
The Muravsky Trail is good tank country though. kramatorsk looks terribly vulnerable.
Even the Ukrainian propaganda acknowledges the irreversible suppression of the ukronazi Taras Bobanich.
https://au.topnews.media/ukraine/nta-ua-lviv-resident-soldier-of-right-sector-taras-hammer-bobanich-died-in-battles/
Russia says it obliterated ‘Europe-supplied’ S-300 launchers
https://www.rt.com/russia/553662-s300-missiles-ukraine-slovakia/Replies: @Beckow
The PM Eddy Heger is desperately claiming that Kiev told him that “it is not true“. Who knows, it was junk from the 80’s anyway.
Heger is an interesting comprador: he lived for a while in New Jersey selling “eastern Vodka” to convenience stores. Then he found Jesus, or more likely Jesus found him. He became PM when the previous guy from his party bought Sputnik C19 vaccine without permission.
Their party is named “Ordinary folks“, no joke. It had to be quite an offsite when they came up with that. The rumor is that Eddy brought all the unsold vodka, but as with the S-300’s it is hard to confirm.
Slovakia hasn’t been bombed since US destroyed our refineries at the end of WWII. Unless we start failing the Roma kids in school at what Brussels or Herr Soros consider an unacceptably high rate, we are probably safe. But one never knows and it is not helping Eddy. His party is now at 8%, he is definitely going back to vodka and Jesus.
They are another single use “reform” party dumped on Europe to buy time. But at least Macron looks sober and the Pirates in Czechia prefers pot to vodka. But these guys…
Would a 100% blood free blockade of Ukraine's ports be "acceptable" under the MrHack definition? After all such a situation precisely fills your exact logical test, Not one person would die of thirst over 8 years in Ukraine.
PEACE 😇Replies: @Mr. Hack
It’s only a diversion for you, because it points out some real concerns that go against your own very untenable stances.
In this specific case nobody in Crimea had their very life threatened by the actions taken. Sure, it was an inconvenience, but the citizens there hadn’t really thought things through in their haste to leave Ukraine. Ukraine, to this day doesn’t recognize this seceding, and is indeed at war currently with Russian troops that are stationed in Crimea. Making things comfortable for an enemy that has even killed innocent bystanders and civilians, is beyond the pale of reasonable conduct. Legal relationships cannot be swept under the rug, like you seem to be advocating.
Probably not. Again there are international laws that govern the manner in which ports and waterways are to be used. What you and your newfound hero Putler are advocating is a world that disregards the rule of law in exchange for personal fiat. A very slippery slope that can only lead to armed conflict.
I have unequivocally stated that both Russia and Ukraine have been manipulated. Thus, neither are heroes or virtuous. You are trying very hard to ignore this inconvenient fact as it undermines your untenable position. I concur.
Ukraine's government disregarded the law, and arguably committed a war crime, by targeting Crimea's civilization population. The fiat of unilateral, Ukrainian dam building, was a slippery slope contributing factor leading to the current armed conflict.
PEACE 😇Replies: @Mr. Hack
Shutting off water is a deadly threatening act.
That wasn’t shutting off all water. It shut off water from a 1970s Soviet project that irrigated arid northern Crimea. Soviet era farms were rekt but nobody’s life was threatened.
The Ukrainian government had to know that unilateral action was inflammatory... But they went ahead and cut off the water anyway.
PEACE 😇
__________
(1) From 2021 -- https://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htwin/articles/20210712.aspx
Russia, in the other hand, attacked with the full confidence of an overwhelmingly superior modernized army, which affirms the basic mythos of modernity.
Moreover, the Russian expectation of a quick Ukrainian collapse is an indication of the Russian value system - they seem genuinely shocked that anyone can not prioritize survival, and not bow to superior power.
It's so un-modern.
In this it is no different than the West, or China.
As for where are we going forward in the West (and the world)?
Obviously and as you correctly see, there simply is no solution from within the current paradigm.
All the options of the current paradigm have been exhausted, and we are just doing over and over what doesn't work. The current paradigm is logic and analysis and control, just more and more of it.
What is happening now though is the steady buildup of stresses and collapses within the current paradigm, which will ultimately lead to it's widespread collapse, which will include China and Russia and the whole world.Replies: @silviosilver, @Dmitry, @Beckow
I agree, that seems about right for the West, Russia, China. Some are further behind so they have more time.
But you idealize what the Ukrainians are doing. They are at an even lower level of hedonism-survival game than the others. Ukies are a relatively sophisticated, capable and well-endowed nation, but they dramatically fell on very hard times for 20-30 years. Ukraine has lost its relative standing more and faster than any other country since Germany after 1945.
They are desperate: some want out by any means, others to steal what is left or sell it to the West. Most are at this point cargo-cult aficionados expecting salvation from the outside or to-hell-with-it-all. It is not what you think – it is more a collective collapse. They are not behaving rationally or even thinking in terms of country’s future. But some are very heroic as was Hector in Troy. In the long run, that is just folklore.
Yes, there is still courage and competence among many, but not all. They know that it is ending, that the sweet dream of being just like “Europe” is not about to happen.
Its not necessary to play up what the Ukrainians did - in pre-modern times, it would not be unusual.
But imagine had the Ukrainians simply surrendered to the Russians - this would have been a massive confirmation of global materialism, and would have strengthened the belief that only material factors matter and discouraged and demoralized anyone wanting to resist power.
It would been a huge win for "Goobohomo" (I hate that name), and for the materialistic assumptions that it depends on, and promoted belief in technocratic control.
China, Russia, and the West, would have made a significant step closer towards converging on a consensus global system of technocratic control and materialism, that would incorporate the worst aspects of Chinese, Russian, and American and European autocracy.
You must look beneath the surface and see the wider picture - that Russia superficially opposes certain manifestations of Woke in the US does not mean it does not represent a a similarly materialistic system of technocratic control.
This does not mean America and the West are the "good guys" - as I hope I made clear, I believe the fight is against all mainstream systems in all the major global players, with perhaps the Woke system in America, and the surveillance state and work culture of China, being the worst examples, with China in my opinion for the time being taking the lead in global dystopia.
To me, the amusing thing is that the West does not understand that supporting Ukraine undermines the materialist system it lives hy at it's root :)
In this way, people often undercut themselves in fundamental ways while trying to promote themselves in superficial ways.
But that's "paradox" :) And the West is singularity lacking in "wisdom" and always sees only the surface.
All that being said, Ukraine represents a small crack in the global system and the materialistic consensus that goes beyond the geopoltical struggle between the great poets.Replies: @Beckow, @silviosilver, @songbird
I just don’t know where to begin. It’s even more insane than the Intermarium concept they bat around in the western Slav states. If Russia breaks up further the only mechanism for it would be the CIA and MI6 encouraging Turanic and Mongol populations to slaughter whites in those central Asian regions.
Do the Ukies have imperial ambitions of their own? Armed to the teeth spoiling for a fight. Total loose cannon. Their border dispute with Russia already appears to have ended the petrodollar and globalisation. What’s next? Extermination if white enclaves in Northern Asia?Replies: @Beckow
Could you expand upon it? I’m not sure I understand it.
Is it meant to cause inflation in the US? Or soft-decouple? Or target Shanghai University students and other potential political undesirables?
I’d like to think that it was something 4D, rather than Covid hysteria. But is Shanghai as integrated into the global economy, as the Pearl Delta? Maybe, targeting the Pearl would hurt Russia?
Want to sincerely thank comrade Xi for driving the oil price down further while being principled in preserving current Chinese population numbers untouched with his zero Covid effort 😉
Karlin because of this becoming again stark raving mad as a rabid blind bat at the noon in sunlight is a nice additional bonus too, lol
I had the idea that they might be like the Cherokee, who enthusiastically tried to sign up whenever the US was in any war, bringing their own guns. Chechens, I think, actually have the highest Ancient North Eurasian component outside of Amerinds.
But, with the subsidies, i don’t think they are cheap soldiers. Russia would probably be better off spending the money on drones.
This is what I wrote February 17th, before the war: Meanwhile the pro-Russians were insisting that Ukraine would fall within days, mass surrender, elite mass flight, etc.
My mistake was that I assumed that the people in charge of Russia knew as much as even I knew and therefore would not choose to start this stupid and bloody adventure. All I know is the Ukrainian people and people in Ukraine. One would think tat Russians would have sufficient intelligence in Ukraine to know the same thing. but I guess they foolishly believed their own myths about Ukraine not being a real country, the people pining for reunion with their comparatively rich Russian brothers, etc.Replies: @Wokechoke, @utu
This was a part of propaganda.The most important pre-war propaganda that (1) Russian army is indomitable, any resistance to it is futile, that once Putin unleashes his army against Ukraine pro Russian government would be installed in Kiev within 48 hours and (2) that Russia is not going to invade Ukraine, Russia is conducting some training exercises and accusations of Russia by American and British media of planning an invasion were just vile lies as usual. Both (1) and (2) were meant to prevent the West from arming Ukraine and doing anything for Ukraine to increase her chances. And it pretty much worked in Europe except for the UK and the US.
Ron Unz was strongly pushing (1) (indomitable hypersonic Putin Wuderwaffe) and (2) ( just NYT and WaPo propaganda as Putin would never invade) while Karlin was pushing (1) only.
The alleged surprise in Germany when Russia eventually attacked, that Germany allegedly did not believe British and American intelligence finding is a total BS. That Germany’s intelligence chief was caught by war in Kiev is a nice touch to legitimize that BS. Actually what was he doing there: telling Zelensky to surrender?
Germany knew just as America knew that Russia would attack but unlike America Germany hoped that the spiel about the indomitable army of Putin was true and that there would be new pro-Russian government in Kiev in 48 hours. Germany gave Putin green light for the Anschluss of Ukraine hoping that it would be over soon and after some display of indignations in media and by politicians the business with Russia would return to normal. Germany was doing everything to not arm Ukraine and make Ukraine easier to be swallowed by the “indomitable Putin army”.
Germany did not allow RAF plane with arms to Ukraine fly over its territory. (Jan 18, 2022)
It took 5 weeks of war for Germany to grant approval for transfer of armored personnel vehicles by Czech Republic to Ukraine
Expect more shenanigans and obstructions from Germany because they are not done and had not given up on Russia.
German Elites wanted Russia to attack without achieving a quick victory. The current lengthy armed conflict with no clear winner serves the Merkel/Scholz policy of Open [Muslim] Borders. The enemies of Christianity are getting exactly what they want out of the fight they created.
PEACE 😇
Actually this one detail obliterates each and every other consideration amongst any German with > .5 of a brain.
Where have I called Putin a “hero”. Provide a citation or withdraw your libel.
I have unequivocally stated that both Russia and Ukraine have been manipulated. Thus, neither are heroes or virtuous. You are trying very hard to ignore this inconvenient fact as it undermines your untenable position.
I concur.
Ukraine’s government disregarded the law, and arguably committed a war crime, by targeting Crimea’s civilization population. The fiat of unilateral, Ukrainian dam building, was a slippery slope contributing factor leading to the current armed conflict.
PEACE 😇
In our late and tired times, I think we have to be happy with any movement away from the global consensus of materialism.
Its not necessary to play up what the Ukrainians did – in pre-modern times, it would not be unusual.
But imagine had the Ukrainians simply surrendered to the Russians – this would have been a massive confirmation of global materialism, and would have strengthened the belief that only material factors matter and discouraged and demoralized anyone wanting to resist power.
It would been a huge win for “Goobohomo” (I hate that name), and for the materialistic assumptions that it depends on, and promoted belief in technocratic control.
China, Russia, and the West, would have made a significant step closer towards converging on a consensus global system of technocratic control and materialism, that would incorporate the worst aspects of Chinese, Russian, and American and European autocracy.
You must look beneath the surface and see the wider picture – that Russia superficially opposes certain manifestations of Woke in the US does not mean it does not represent a a similarly materialistic system of technocratic control.
This does not mean America and the West are the “good guys” – as I hope I made clear, I believe the fight is against all mainstream systems in all the major global players, with perhaps the Woke system in America, and the surveillance state and work culture of China, being the worst examples, with China in my opinion for the time being taking the lead in global dystopia.
To me, the amusing thing is that the West does not understand that supporting Ukraine undermines the materialist system it lives hy at it’s root 🙂
In this way, people often undercut themselves in fundamental ways while trying to promote themselves in superficial ways.
But that’s “paradox” 🙂 And the West is singularity lacking in “wisdom” and always sees only the surface.
All that being said, Ukraine represents a small crack in the global system and the materialistic consensus that goes beyond the geopoltical struggle between the great poets.
(*credit for that line goes to Objectivist doyen, Leonard Peikoff, who took it from the title of a 1950s-60s Catholic lecture series, "Life Is Worth Living," by Bishop Fulton Sheen.)Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @AaronB, @Barbarossa
Ron Unz was strongly pushing (1) (indomitable hypersonic Putin Wuderwaffe) and (2) ( just NYT and WaPo propaganda as Putin would never invade) while Karlin was pushing (1) only.
The alleged surprise in Germany when Russia eventually attacked, that Germany allegedly did not believe British and American intelligence finding is a total BS. That Germany's intelligence chief was caught by war in Kiev is a nice touch to legitimize that BS. Actually what was he doing there: telling Zelensky to surrender? Germany knew just as America knew that Russia would attack but unlike America Germany hoped that the spiel about the indomitable army of Putin was true and that there would be new pro-Russian government in Kiev in 48 hours. Germany gave Putin green light for the Anschluss of Ukraine hoping that it would be over soon and after some display of indignations in media and by politicians the business with Russia would return to normal. Germany was doing everything to not arm Ukraine and make Ukraine easier to be swallowed by the "indomitable Putin army".
Germany did not allow RAF plane with arms to Ukraine fly over its territory. (Jan 18, 2022) It took 5 weeks of war for Germany to grant approval for transfer of armored personnel vehicles by Czech Republic to Ukraine Expect more shenanigans and obstructions from Germany because they are not done and had not given up on Russia.Replies: @silviosilver, @A123, @Emil Nikola Richard, @RadicalCenter
The comment you quoted doesn’t prove they knew; it just proves they (or merely he) had a ready answer in the event of an attack. You just don’t like the answer he had, so you confect a conspiracy to thwart the Ukrainians out of it. That his answer turned out to be incorrect is neither here nor there, since foreign policy analysis is routinely wrong. (The expertise of such analysts compared to a person completely untutored in their dark art lies in the frequency (and intensity) with which they produce good (excellent) or bad (catastrophic) analysis.)
https://www.unz.com/akarlin/the-partition-of-syria/#comment-2206848
https://www.unz.com/akarlin/quantified-jq/#comment-2217296
https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-12/#comment-1886812
He is ultimately a deeply stupid person who isn't much different from the "rightoid" nutcases on UR he professes to despise, unable to think about political issues in any other way than speculation about conspiracies. Anything beyond that simply doesn't exist for him.
As for Lindner I can believe that he was an uncaring dick and expected the Ukrainians to falter immediately, and certainly legitimate criticisms of German policy towards Russia can be made (creating that level of energy dependence on Russia was very foolish). I admit I may have been mistaken about some things as well (though reading AK's increasingly unhinged chauvinist ranting did make me feel uneasy about the possible direction of Russia). If the war lasts much longer, it will probably be necessary for Germany to send heavy weapons like tanks to Ukraine, Russia needs to get a bloody nose until she is willing to come to acceptable terms. Contrary to what utu asserts, the media pressure for this is already building up in Germany.
The anti-German resentment cropping up among many Eastern Europeans (basically amounting to accusations of a Molotov-Ribbentrop 2.0) is something else however, imo it crosses over into irrational hatred and is very revealing of underlying sentiments. It pisses me off, as does the frequent playing of the Nazi card and the shameless attempts at moral blackmail. Of course it's not relevant what people like me think. More interesting will be what might happen after the war (I assume a scenario where at least a major part of Ukraine will stay independent and enter into some form of association with the EU). Western shitlibs right now are the biggest supporters of Ukraine (sometimes explicitly with reasoning of the sort that Putin oppresses homosexuals and is against wokeness, so presumably they think Ukraine is somehow fighting for those causes as well, instead of just fighting a traditional struggle for national independence and sovereignty)...contradictions are overlooked or forgiven (e.g. the Ukrainian ambassador to Germany Melnyk paid a visit of honour to Stepan Bandera's grave in Munich a few years ago, when slightly criticized for it, he threw a tantrum on Twitter, how nobody, least of all Germans, would tell Ukrainians whom to regard as their heroes...yeah right, because someone like Stepan Bandera is compatible with the spirit of the EU project, lol). After the war, when Ukraine will be needing EU money for re-construction, these contradictions might come to a head.Replies: @Coconuts, @Barbarossa, @silviosilver, @Yevardian
The whole point for my comment was to state that Germany to the very end wanted to play the card that Russians won't invade but in reality it was not necessarily what they were hoping for. Their objective was to make any military aid for Ukraine seem not very urgent.Replies: @German_reader
Dams threatening agriculture is a precursor to armed conflict. Ethiopia’s dam on the Blue Nile could easily provoke a war with Sudan and Egypt. (1)
The Ukrainian government had to know that unilateral action was inflammatory… But they went ahead and cut off the water anyway.
PEACE 😇
__________
(1) From 2021 — https://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htwin/articles/20210712.aspx
Ron Unz was strongly pushing (1) (indomitable hypersonic Putin Wuderwaffe) and (2) ( just NYT and WaPo propaganda as Putin would never invade) while Karlin was pushing (1) only.
The alleged surprise in Germany when Russia eventually attacked, that Germany allegedly did not believe British and American intelligence finding is a total BS. That Germany's intelligence chief was caught by war in Kiev is a nice touch to legitimize that BS. Actually what was he doing there: telling Zelensky to surrender? Germany knew just as America knew that Russia would attack but unlike America Germany hoped that the spiel about the indomitable army of Putin was true and that there would be new pro-Russian government in Kiev in 48 hours. Germany gave Putin green light for the Anschluss of Ukraine hoping that it would be over soon and after some display of indignations in media and by politicians the business with Russia would return to normal. Germany was doing everything to not arm Ukraine and make Ukraine easier to be swallowed by the "indomitable Putin army".
Germany did not allow RAF plane with arms to Ukraine fly over its territory. (Jan 18, 2022) It took 5 weeks of war for Germany to grant approval for transfer of armored personnel vehicles by Czech Republic to Ukraine Expect more shenanigans and obstructions from Germany because they are not done and had not given up on Russia.Replies: @silviosilver, @A123, @Emil Nikola Richard, @RadicalCenter
The last thing Germany wanted was a quick victory. That would not have created a new wave of rape-ugees.
German Elites wanted Russia to attack without achieving a quick victory. The current lengthy armed conflict with no clear winner serves the Merkel/Scholz policy of Open [Muslim] Borders. The enemies of Christianity are getting exactly what they want out of the fight they created.
PEACE 😇
But, with the subsidies, i don't think they are cheap soldiers. Russia would probably be better off spending the money on drones.Replies: @sudden death
Wonder if Cherokees ever were behaving that way with US white commanders like Kadyrov is doing with his dominating body language while forcing them to chant Chechen Muslim slogans like Ahmat power?:
I get the idea that he did not grow up within a hundred miles of a basketball court.
Did you see him trying to shoot hoops?
I get the idea that he did not grow up within a hundred miles of a basketball court.
http://www.tbnumismatics.com/mistaken-misogyny-andrew-mellon-laura-fraser--the-george-washington-portraiture.html
There may be a "woke" angle to changing the portrait of Washington right now, but the update is by far the superior design so it may be a case of the right choice for the wrong reasons.
I think the change in American coinage in the middle and second half of the 20th century is symbolic of the death of America the nation and the ascendance of America the Empire. The designs went from various symbolic depictions of Liberty to the bland visages of dead leaders.
As you say, it parallels the differences between Greek and Roman coinage.Replies: @songbird, @S, @RadicalCenter
This is interesting, as your comments often are. But I’m much more worried about whether the currency, with whatever faces and designs, will buy enough food, fuel, and medicine for our large family as the intended inflation grinds us down.
https://decivitate.substack.com/p/how-the-national-debt-will-destroy?s=r
I came across this synopsis of the US national debt/ financial prospects that I thought was good. It reinforces the idea that I've had that the Fed is basically out of tools to really deal with our economic situation which doesn't result in widespread pain. It's a hard thing to even be able to prepare for. I live in an area with a lot of people on the skinny knife's edge of financial disaster, and it's hard to see how any further increases in fuel and living expenses won't put them over the brink. Especially given how it's dubious that the government can swoop in and bail everyone out, given that they already shot that wad over covid.
I hope you find ways to keep the ends meeting.
I have unequivocally stated that both Russia and Ukraine have been manipulated. Thus, neither are heroes or virtuous. You are trying very hard to ignore this inconvenient fact as it undermines your untenable position. I concur.
Ukraine's government disregarded the law, and arguably committed a war crime, by targeting Crimea's civilization population. The fiat of unilateral, Ukrainian dam building, was a slippery slope contributing factor leading to the current armed conflict.
PEACE 😇Replies: @Mr. Hack
Libel? Now that’s hilarious! 🙂 When I read comments from somebody that seems to be bending over backwards to see the Russian point of view in this sad war, and never the Ukrainian side, I think that I might be excused for categorizing you as just another Putin shill here at this blogsite?
I don’t recall you ever mentioning that Ukraine has been manipulated into this purely defensive war on its part? Maybe I missed it somewhere? As for Russia, it seems to have carefully chosen the path to war, given several months to renege on this strategy.
Exactly what law did Ukraine break?
https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-184-russia-ukraine/#comment-5280634/ Your inability retain information presented less than 3 days ago is suspiciously convenient. It is almost like you are desperately misrepresenting the record because you know your position is unsupportable.
If you go back further, you will find that I have opposed Putin's support of Merkel's NS2 aggression. The law about collective punishment.
There are a number of ways this could be brought as a legal case, feel free to research it yourself. Be aware that I am already breaking out "the cheese" for your impending attempt to derail the conversation by "whining" about minutiae of specific statutes.
PEACE 😇Replies: @A123, @Mr. Hack
Ron Unz was strongly pushing (1) (indomitable hypersonic Putin Wuderwaffe) and (2) ( just NYT and WaPo propaganda as Putin would never invade) while Karlin was pushing (1) only.
The alleged surprise in Germany when Russia eventually attacked, that Germany allegedly did not believe British and American intelligence finding is a total BS. That Germany's intelligence chief was caught by war in Kiev is a nice touch to legitimize that BS. Actually what was he doing there: telling Zelensky to surrender? Germany knew just as America knew that Russia would attack but unlike America Germany hoped that the spiel about the indomitable army of Putin was true and that there would be new pro-Russian government in Kiev in 48 hours. Germany gave Putin green light for the Anschluss of Ukraine hoping that it would be over soon and after some display of indignations in media and by politicians the business with Russia would return to normal. Germany was doing everything to not arm Ukraine and make Ukraine easier to be swallowed by the "indomitable Putin army".
Germany did not allow RAF plane with arms to Ukraine fly over its territory. (Jan 18, 2022) It took 5 weeks of war for Germany to grant approval for transfer of armored personnel vehicles by Czech Republic to Ukraine Expect more shenanigans and obstructions from Germany because they are not done and had not given up on Russia.Replies: @silviosilver, @A123, @Emil Nikola Richard, @RadicalCenter
Also they need (or at least they want real bad) one f**kton of natural gas.
Actually this one detail obliterates each and every other consideration amongst any German with > .5 of a brain.
God, from Hunyadi to Thököly Petöfi to István Tisza to Horthy, why are Hungarians so utterlyshit at diplomacy? To bad reiner tor isn't here anymore too expand on Hungary's unbeaten track record on joining sides just as they start losing.
Imagine Hungary managing to alienate Poland at this time. The only intelligent leader they ever had was Kádár.Replies: @RadicalCenter
Oh no, “alienating Poland”!! How will they survive.
LOL
Ron Unz was strongly pushing (1) (indomitable hypersonic Putin Wuderwaffe) and (2) ( just NYT and WaPo propaganda as Putin would never invade) while Karlin was pushing (1) only.
The alleged surprise in Germany when Russia eventually attacked, that Germany allegedly did not believe British and American intelligence finding is a total BS. That Germany's intelligence chief was caught by war in Kiev is a nice touch to legitimize that BS. Actually what was he doing there: telling Zelensky to surrender? Germany knew just as America knew that Russia would attack but unlike America Germany hoped that the spiel about the indomitable army of Putin was true and that there would be new pro-Russian government in Kiev in 48 hours. Germany gave Putin green light for the Anschluss of Ukraine hoping that it would be over soon and after some display of indignations in media and by politicians the business with Russia would return to normal. Germany was doing everything to not arm Ukraine and make Ukraine easier to be swallowed by the "indomitable Putin army".
Germany did not allow RAF plane with arms to Ukraine fly over its territory. (Jan 18, 2022) It took 5 weeks of war for Germany to grant approval for transfer of armored personnel vehicles by Czech Republic to Ukraine Expect more shenanigans and obstructions from Germany because they are not done and had not given up on Russia.Replies: @silviosilver, @A123, @Emil Nikola Richard, @RadicalCenter
Good for Germany then.
One may ask why Germany was so imprudent and shortsighted. Why did they allowed themselves to liquidae their nuclear industry? Why did they let themselves to be so dependent on Russian gas? Did they really believe that Russia could become a normal country to created extended Europe from Lisbon to Vladivostok? To what extent Russian agentur in Germany (green movement, pacifists and so on) was responsible for it?Replies: @songbird, @AP, @utu, @Dmitry
The fact that you went where you did.... That says a great deal about you.
PEACE 😇Replies: @silviosilver, @WizardWhoKnocks
The Israeli worshipping William F. Buckly lover is a race cuck? I wouldn’t have believed it if I didn’t witness it myself!
How about here: (Typos corrected & emphasis added)
https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-184-russia-ukraine/#comment-5280634/
Your inability retain information presented less than 3 days ago is suspiciously convenient. It is almost like you are desperately misrepresenting the record because you know your position is unsupportable.
If you go back further, you will find that I have opposed Putin’s support of Merkel’s NS2 aggression.
The law about collective punishment.
There are a number of ways this could be brought as a legal case, feel free to research it yourself. Be aware that I am already breaking out “the cheese” for your impending attempt to derail the conversation by “whining” about minutiae of specific statutes.
PEACE 😇
https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-184-russia-ukraine/#comment-5280634
https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-184-russia-ukraine/#comment-5280634/ Your inability retain information presented less than 3 days ago is suspiciously convenient. It is almost like you are desperately misrepresenting the record because you know your position is unsupportable.
If you go back further, you will find that I have opposed Putin's support of Merkel's NS2 aggression. The law about collective punishment.
There are a number of ways this could be brought as a legal case, feel free to research it yourself. Be aware that I am already breaking out "the cheese" for your impending attempt to derail the conversation by "whining" about minutiae of specific statutes.
PEACE 😇Replies: @A123, @Mr. Hack
Fixed link:
https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-184-russia-ukraine/#comment-5280634
Gavin Newson’s proposal to set up a “Task Force to Study and Develop Repatriation Proposals for African Americans” might be a sign of him turning over a new leaf.
I only wish he came up with a better acronym.
https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-184-russia-ukraine/#comment-5280634/ Your inability retain information presented less than 3 days ago is suspiciously convenient. It is almost like you are desperately misrepresenting the record because you know your position is unsupportable.
If you go back further, you will find that I have opposed Putin's support of Merkel's NS2 aggression. The law about collective punishment.
There are a number of ways this could be brought as a legal case, feel free to research it yourself. Be aware that I am already breaking out "the cheese" for your impending attempt to derail the conversation by "whining" about minutiae of specific statutes.
PEACE 😇Replies: @A123, @Mr. Hack
You flatter yourself way too much by trying to imply that I should remember everything that you’ve written here, or something that you wrote three days ago. Zelensky’s tone and posture has only gotten louder as civilian deaths have mounted. I believe that he was sincerely trying to get Putin to reconsider his whole plan to invade Ukraine. He’s now left with dealing with this nasty war, one that he never wanted for Ukraine. He doesn’t need any coaching about being more “provocative and inflammatory” at this point by any global elites. Also, my selective memory that you seem to be implying is active, is only outdone by your own. Only a couple of hours ago I asked you a direct question, that you seem to be at a total loss to answer:
Remember, the devil is always in the details. 🙂
Shall I bring the wine to your impending cheese party? 🙂 🙂
Collectively the laws related to "collective punishment " Indeed I am aware that you are devilish, wishing to misdirect the conversation via irrelevant detail. You confirmed my suspicion by whining about minutiae instead of dealing with facts.
PEACE 😇Replies: @Mr. Hack
This oafish reply of yours omits that he was democratically elected and overthrown undemocratically by a regime which appointed a disproportionate number of anti-Russian extremists, thereby leading to the understandable predicaments in Crimea and Donbass.
Circa late 1980s, Kord vodka was being sold in the NY metro area.
Officially, Russia’s invasion has now produced more than half of the civilian deaths in 7 weeks as had happened in Donbas in 8 years (once numbers are counted this toll will probably be equal).Replies: @Mikhail
UN affiliated OSCE info on Donbass note a recent Kiev regime upswing in the months before the Russian attack:
https://nationalinterest.org/feature/will-tensions-ukraine-boil-over-200725
The refugee numbers from that area to Russia numbering around one million, since 2014, along with about another one million leaving Ukraine to Russia (since the so-called Orange Revolution) over the past and not including reunified Crimea.
civilians officially.Thanks for posting the link.Replies: @Mikhail
I directly answered your question.
Collectively the laws related to “collective punishment ”
Indeed I am aware that you are devilish, wishing to misdirect the conversation via irrelevant detail. You confirmed my suspicion by whining about minutiae instead of dealing with facts.
PEACE 😇
https://twitter.com/aaronjmate/status/1496308793810034688
https://nationalinterest.org/feature/will-tensions-ukraine-boil-over-200725
The refugee numbers from that area to Russia numbering around one million, since 2014, along with about another one million leaving Ukraine to Russia (since the so-called Orange Revolution) over the past and not including reunified Crimea.Replies: @AP
The link shows that the number of civilians killed in 2021 was 25, the lowest number since hostilities began. Of the 25 killed, only 7 were killed through direct violence. The largest number, 12, were killed because they hit mines. Since most deaths occurred in rebel territory these were probably mines laid by the rebels or the Russians.
To stop this situation, Russia invaded another county where it has already killed 1,800
civilians officially.
Thanks for posting the link.
Its not necessary to play up what the Ukrainians did - in pre-modern times, it would not be unusual.
But imagine had the Ukrainians simply surrendered to the Russians - this would have been a massive confirmation of global materialism, and would have strengthened the belief that only material factors matter and discouraged and demoralized anyone wanting to resist power.
It would been a huge win for "Goobohomo" (I hate that name), and for the materialistic assumptions that it depends on, and promoted belief in technocratic control.
China, Russia, and the West, would have made a significant step closer towards converging on a consensus global system of technocratic control and materialism, that would incorporate the worst aspects of Chinese, Russian, and American and European autocracy.
You must look beneath the surface and see the wider picture - that Russia superficially opposes certain manifestations of Woke in the US does not mean it does not represent a a similarly materialistic system of technocratic control.
This does not mean America and the West are the "good guys" - as I hope I made clear, I believe the fight is against all mainstream systems in all the major global players, with perhaps the Woke system in America, and the surveillance state and work culture of China, being the worst examples, with China in my opinion for the time being taking the lead in global dystopia.
To me, the amusing thing is that the West does not understand that supporting Ukraine undermines the materialist system it lives hy at it's root :)
In this way, people often undercut themselves in fundamental ways while trying to promote themselves in superficial ways.
But that's "paradox" :) And the West is singularity lacking in "wisdom" and always sees only the surface.
All that being said, Ukraine represents a small crack in the global system and the materialistic consensus that goes beyond the geopoltical struggle between the great poets.Replies: @Beckow, @silviosilver, @songbird
As a symbol that’s true. But in reality there are no more materialist people in Europe today. The Ukies I know are hungry and pleading for free stuff, willing to sell themselves. They use or deny their own identity as needed. It is not a very spiritual group. Maybe the ones who stayed behind to die for NATO membership are different, I can’t wait to meet them if they ever make it out.
This yearning and materialism are the core of recent angry uprisings in Ukraine. They felt left out, they yearned with such passion for a European life that it was touching. It is a contradiction that this extreme material hunger is leading to non-materialist sacrifices. That’s not what most of them had in mind.
When this is over the regrets will be huge: recriminations against everyone from Zelensky, Brussels, Biden to Putin. They are destroying a country and its people to score temporary points against each other. If there is no NATO in Ukraine Russia will win, and vice-versa. But Ukraine is by far the biggest loser. That makes me wonder about the sanity of Ukie enthusiasts here. Let’s say Putin is gone after this, would that make it worth it? Who will even remember the silly acronyms and personalities a few years from now?
I am sure they are heavily corrupted by modernity as we all are, and I'm sure they too suffer from a heavy materialistic streak. No doubt about it. They also appear to have unsavoury elements to their traditional nationalism, although again they're hardly unique in this.
But the fact they resisted at all shows some level of non-materalism, as people who just wanted comfort and prosperity don't fight, sacrifice themselves, and endure destruction and hardship, because if comfort is your primary value submitting to an aggressor is always the superior choice, particularly one that just wants to dominate and assimilate you and enslave or destroy you.
And in today's world, we must take what we can get, even if it isn't much.
Even to an outsider like myself not particularly involved in the conflict, Putin's Russia seems to have something cold and power worshipping about it, something that is about size and materialism and domination. Surely, Karlin's attitude cannot be completely unrelated to the spiritual atmosphere of Putin's Russia, even if he is projecting somewhat.
It's not hard to imagine the Ukrainians see this more vividly from their perch, and are terrified of being assimilated into it.
It's like Taiwan is hardly some some of paragon of spirituality, and is in fact deeply sick with modernity, but when you look at the cold soulless face of Xi's China, you can understand why the Taiwanese are terrified of being absorbed into it.
That doesn't mean the Ukrainians and Taiwanese are not deeply flawed and corrupted by modernity, and are some kind of spiritual paragons. Not at all.
And these trends of surveillance, control, power worship, domination, respect for size are gaining massive ground in the West, and any success for Putin or Xi means a loss for the possibility of spiritual rejuvenation in the West.
That's the larger picture.
All this being said, I don't want to demonize ordinary Russians, or ordinary Chinese, who are not responsible for this. All the "cancelling" of Russians that is now taking place across the West is hideous, misguided, and gratuitously cruel.
It's also totalitarian, which makes it all the more urgent to not support the totalitarian impulse anywhere in the world.
But definitely the situation is complex, and even if on balance one supports a particular side it's really important to keep in mind all the contradictions and facts that complicate the picture and make things more gray than black and white.Replies: @Beckow
The Ukrainians are making fun of his overuse of the parasite word “don”. When I first heard him use it all the time, I thought it must have some deep “Chechen warrior” meaning (kind of like the Muslim Inshallah). 🙂 It turns out it’s just their version of the English “like”. So he’s speaking heavily accented Russian and inserting the Chechen version of “like” into his speech constantly. They call him “Don Kadyrov” now. lolz
That’s just utu’s usual modus operandi. He always claims to have some special insight into what’s going on behind the scenes, what motivates political players and what their secret calculations are…but it’s based on nothing, or almost nothing, just a product of his over-active imagination. I found some especially funny examples from a few years ago (when he claimed to have insight into the plans of the “German deep state” and what motivated Merkel’s opening of the borders in 2015, that was before his current anti-German/anti-Russsian mania, his obsession were Jews and Israel back then), they’ve stuck in my mind because they were so absurd:
https://www.unz.com/akarlin/the-partition-of-syria/#comment-2206848
https://www.unz.com/akarlin/quantified-jq/#comment-2217296
https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-12/#comment-1886812
He is ultimately a deeply stupid person who isn’t much different from the “rightoid” nutcases on UR he professes to despise, unable to think about political issues in any other way than speculation about conspiracies. Anything beyond that simply doesn’t exist for him.
As for Lindner I can believe that he was an uncaring dick and expected the Ukrainians to falter immediately, and certainly legitimate criticisms of German policy towards Russia can be made (creating that level of energy dependence on Russia was very foolish). I admit I may have been mistaken about some things as well (though reading AK’s increasingly unhinged chauvinist ranting did make me feel uneasy about the possible direction of Russia). If the war lasts much longer, it will probably be necessary for Germany to send heavy weapons like tanks to Ukraine, Russia needs to get a bloody nose until she is willing to come to acceptable terms. Contrary to what utu asserts, the media pressure for this is already building up in Germany.
The anti-German resentment cropping up among many Eastern Europeans (basically amounting to accusations of a Molotov-Ribbentrop 2.0) is something else however, imo it crosses over into irrational hatred and is very revealing of underlying sentiments. It pisses me off, as does the frequent playing of the Nazi card and the shameless attempts at moral blackmail. Of course it’s not relevant what people like me think. More interesting will be what might happen after the war (I assume a scenario where at least a major part of Ukraine will stay independent and enter into some form of association with the EU). Western shitlibs right now are the biggest supporters of Ukraine (sometimes explicitly with reasoning of the sort that Putin oppresses homosexuals and is against wokeness, so presumably they think Ukraine is somehow fighting for those causes as well, instead of just fighting a traditional struggle for national independence and sovereignty)…contradictions are overlooked or forgiven (e.g. the Ukrainian ambassador to Germany Melnyk paid a visit of honour to Stepan Bandera’s grave in Munich a few years ago, when slightly criticized for it, he threw a tantrum on Twitter, how nobody, least of all Germans, would tell Ukrainians whom to regard as their heroes…yeah right, because someone like Stepan Bandera is compatible with the spirit of the EU project, lol). After the war, when Ukraine will be needing EU money for re-construction, these contradictions might come to a head.
Two years ago BLM flags were all the rage, last year the expanded LGBT+++ flag, this year it is the Ukrainian flag. The performative virtue signalling is amusing especially as one flag replaces the next as #rightcause.Replies: @silviosilver
I mean, honestly I was thinking the same thing in February, and I was strongly biased by deteriorating Armenian situation (we are all ethnic grifters), but then we all saw the actual respective of the Ukrainian and Russian forces. But the German government would surely be better informed on such matters and of course has its own motivations.
Not sure that Hungary should reorientate from pan-Turkism, to pan-Mongolism, now that the tables have turned with the Chinese, and the Han regularly make forays into Mongolia to raid for women.
“Good for Germany” – I would not be so sure. Germany possibly could have used its leverage to dissuade Putin from going to war instead they seemed to collude with Putin by sabotaging help for Ukraine in hope that the war would be so short that NATO and EU would have no time to react and thus the business as usual with Russia would continue. Instead Putin was slowed down by Ukrainians and the international community had time to react and unify and Germany had to follow and progressively stricter sanctions against Russia are being imposed and Germany sooner than later will have find other sources than Russia for its gas. Germany’s policy with respect to Russia turned out to be disastrous not just for Ukraine but for Russia and Germany itself. There is no return to business as usual with Russia for next 10 ro 20 years.
One may ask why Germany was so imprudent and shortsighted. Why did they allowed themselves to liquidae their nuclear industry? Why did they let themselves to be so dependent on Russian gas? Did they really believe that Russia could become a normal country to created extended Europe from Lisbon to Vladivostok? To what extent Russian agentur in Germany (green movement, pacifists and so on) was responsible for it?
https://i.ibb.co/XVp1PKL/YGH.png
Is it meant to cause inflation in the US? Or soft-decouple? Or target Shanghai University students and other potential political undesirables?
I'd like to think that it was something 4D, rather than Covid hysteria. But is Shanghai as integrated into the global economy, as the Pearl Delta? Maybe, targeting the Pearl would hurt Russia?Replies: @Yellowface Anon
Soft decoupling that is. What couldn’t be well done in their past attempts with HK and SZ.
Could even be a warning to the US for their effort to isolate Russia, and might even be the main goal of the lockdown with the visual depictions of the Shanghaiese suffering, but this should just be my schizo brain making hidden connections up.
https://www.unz.com/akarlin/the-partition-of-syria/#comment-2206848
https://www.unz.com/akarlin/quantified-jq/#comment-2217296
https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-12/#comment-1886812
He is ultimately a deeply stupid person who isn't much different from the "rightoid" nutcases on UR he professes to despise, unable to think about political issues in any other way than speculation about conspiracies. Anything beyond that simply doesn't exist for him.
As for Lindner I can believe that he was an uncaring dick and expected the Ukrainians to falter immediately, and certainly legitimate criticisms of German policy towards Russia can be made (creating that level of energy dependence on Russia was very foolish). I admit I may have been mistaken about some things as well (though reading AK's increasingly unhinged chauvinist ranting did make me feel uneasy about the possible direction of Russia). If the war lasts much longer, it will probably be necessary for Germany to send heavy weapons like tanks to Ukraine, Russia needs to get a bloody nose until she is willing to come to acceptable terms. Contrary to what utu asserts, the media pressure for this is already building up in Germany.
The anti-German resentment cropping up among many Eastern Europeans (basically amounting to accusations of a Molotov-Ribbentrop 2.0) is something else however, imo it crosses over into irrational hatred and is very revealing of underlying sentiments. It pisses me off, as does the frequent playing of the Nazi card and the shameless attempts at moral blackmail. Of course it's not relevant what people like me think. More interesting will be what might happen after the war (I assume a scenario where at least a major part of Ukraine will stay independent and enter into some form of association with the EU). Western shitlibs right now are the biggest supporters of Ukraine (sometimes explicitly with reasoning of the sort that Putin oppresses homosexuals and is against wokeness, so presumably they think Ukraine is somehow fighting for those causes as well, instead of just fighting a traditional struggle for national independence and sovereignty)...contradictions are overlooked or forgiven (e.g. the Ukrainian ambassador to Germany Melnyk paid a visit of honour to Stepan Bandera's grave in Munich a few years ago, when slightly criticized for it, he threw a tantrum on Twitter, how nobody, least of all Germans, would tell Ukrainians whom to regard as their heroes...yeah right, because someone like Stepan Bandera is compatible with the spirit of the EU project, lol). After the war, when Ukraine will be needing EU money for re-construction, these contradictions might come to a head.Replies: @Coconuts, @Barbarossa, @silviosilver, @Yevardian
The interesting question raised by that link to the Russian propaganda material that sudden death posted earlier in that thread is whether Russia is adopting some of the shitlib postcolonial/CRT rhetoric and ideas. AK sometimes used to post things along these lines as well, I thought it was mainly trolling but maybe it was becoming some part of official discourse.
Karlin wrote about such themes as far back as 2009 (about evil "Romano-Germans", haha):
https://akarlin.com/struggle-europe-mankind/Replies: @Coconuts
One may ask why Germany was so imprudent and shortsighted. Why did they allowed themselves to liquidae their nuclear industry? Why did they let themselves to be so dependent on Russian gas? Did they really believe that Russia could become a normal country to created extended Europe from Lisbon to Vladivostok? To what extent Russian agentur in Germany (green movement, pacifists and so on) was responsible for it?Replies: @songbird, @AP, @utu, @Dmitry
If Germany had wanted to sabotage Ukraine, then probably Merkel would not have flown to Moscow to convince Putin to commit to a ceasefire in February 2015, and instead would have let the separatists boil their cauldron at Debaltsevo, thus destroying the heart of Ukraine’s army, at the time.
I don’t know, I read the translation of that Ria Novosti article and I couldn’t really discern any direct CRT influence. But maybe there’s some sort of convergence between Western postcolonialism and strands of Russian thought. The latter probably have pretty deep roots, due to the tension between Russia’s self-conception as a superior civilization and its actual backwardness compared to Western Europe/the need to import aspects of Western technology and intellectual culture.
Karlin wrote about such themes as far back as 2009 (about evil “Romano-Germans”, haha):
https://akarlin.com/struggle-europe-mankind/
Sure, it would seem so to the uninitiated. But Merkel knew it was too early, today after 7 years Russia can claim more. Those Russian deep assets are very clever.
Another explanation for Germany’s behavior is inertia, things go on until something changes.
Azovites are now crying “chemical attack”. Considering that moderate head-choppers (Syria) and azovites share the same puppeteers and trainers, this fake claim should be hardly surprising.
Karlin wrote about such themes as far back as 2009 (about evil "Romano-Germans", haha):
https://akarlin.com/struggle-europe-mankind/Replies: @Coconuts
I will have to go back and re-read it but it looked in parts like they were claiming that the concept of Ukraine/being Ukrainian is the same kind of artificial construction as white/whiteness is supposed to be in CRT, something created by the dominant for purposes of exploitation, and as being an extension of American and Western racism.
There also seemed to be this idea that these beliefs pervade Ukrainian society and the mass of people, without the Ukrainians being aware of how bad this is, so extensive low level re-education is needed. (Similar to CRT’s ‘unconscious bias’ and the existence of inherited structural racism white people are not conscious of but all participate in and benefit from). It talks about something that looks like radical ‘Decolonisation’ of Ukrainian territory via dismantling all of the cultural and political structures related to that ‘system of oppression’.
Lastly, the idea that ‘Ukronazism’ is more dangerous and serious because it lacks most of the outward traits of Nazism so is more hidden and insidious and can spread more easily. (Resembles claims about racism in the US being worse today since it is no longer overt).
The advantage of the postcolonial option may be that parts of the anti-colonial, anti-imperialist inheritance of the USSR can be selectively readopted, but without any need to reference Marxist-Leninist economics and politics.
I remember that one, maybe typical of the era, the other night I was reading about the debates in France in the 20s about the threat ‘Germano-Slav Asiaticism’ posed to ‘Greco-Latin civilisation’…
But the structural similarities you cite are interesting...maybe could be used as an argument against CRT. Was that in reference to a specific event (Rapallo?) or a more general theory?Replies: @AP
I wrote “Germany knew just as America knew that Russia would attack” which I do not think can be objected to unless you assume than Germany’s intelligence services are populated with people who live in the world of disconnected dots of George Seurat’s painting, the world German_reader was born in and the world where he is destined to die because he lost ability to learn anything since the trauma writing the Ph.D dissertation caused him.
Also I did not write that Germans or Americans knew exactly when the invasion would begin. They had upper and lower bounds set several months and then weeks ahead of time and the bounds were adaptively readjusted in their models as more data was coming in and the bounds were getting closer to each other as the time of actual invasion approached.
The whole point for my comment was to state that Germany to the very end wanted to play the card that Russians won’t invade but in reality it was not necessarily what they were hoping for. Their objective was to make any military aid for Ukraine seem not very urgent.
I don't have any special insight about BND either, but it wouldn't surprise me if they were much less capable than the US/UK security services. They also have to contend with Germany's warped political culture...in 2020 there was a judicial ruling by Germany's constitutional court whose implications might severely restrict the ability of BND to wire-tap foreigners abroad (because of "human rights"):
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urteil_des_Bundesverfassungsgerichts_zur_Ausland-Ausland-Fernmeldeaufkl%C3%A4rung_des_Bundesnachrichtendienstes
Here's an interview with a former BND chief where he complains this might make intelligence gathering for BND near impossible:
https://www.nzz.ch/international/ex-bnd-chef-schindler-geheimdienst-muss-spielraeume-haben-ld.1583313
He also was quite pro-Russian in that interview (in 2020, "We will be happy if we have Russia on our side one day"...a reference to China?). Who knows what influence such predispositions had (you certainly don't).
btw, I might have stayed away, but then I saw your gloating ("Two down"), and thought "Who does this imbecilic asshole think he is that he can bully away other commenters?". You shouldn't have been so triumphalistic.Replies: @utu
Projecting your own inadequacy into others?
Is Jung-Freud really Priss Factor? I say it kind of jokingly, but, nevertheless, there is a certain resemblance, which is hard to ignore.
It is just one of the civilizational fracture lines described by Huntington in the 1990s. Same as Kashmir, the Mexican-American border (see Mexican Reconquista), etc. He wrote 30 years ago about a sort of inevitability of conflicts in these lines.
One may ask why Germany was so imprudent and shortsighted. Why did they allowed themselves to liquidae their nuclear industry? Why did they let themselves to be so dependent on Russian gas? Did they really believe that Russia could become a normal country to created extended Europe from Lisbon to Vladivostok? To what extent Russian agentur in Germany (green movement, pacifists and so on) was responsible for it?Replies: @songbird, @AP, @utu, @Dmitry
There was a joke n Ukraine that Kiev hosted two Russian embassies, one of which used the German language.
German policy can be faulted for a lot, but as I wrote above these Molotov Ribbentropp 2.0 accusations are about pure resentment.Replies: @utu
https://www.unz.com/akarlin/the-partition-of-syria/#comment-2206848
https://www.unz.com/akarlin/quantified-jq/#comment-2217296
https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-12/#comment-1886812
He is ultimately a deeply stupid person who isn't much different from the "rightoid" nutcases on UR he professes to despise, unable to think about political issues in any other way than speculation about conspiracies. Anything beyond that simply doesn't exist for him.
As for Lindner I can believe that he was an uncaring dick and expected the Ukrainians to falter immediately, and certainly legitimate criticisms of German policy towards Russia can be made (creating that level of energy dependence on Russia was very foolish). I admit I may have been mistaken about some things as well (though reading AK's increasingly unhinged chauvinist ranting did make me feel uneasy about the possible direction of Russia). If the war lasts much longer, it will probably be necessary for Germany to send heavy weapons like tanks to Ukraine, Russia needs to get a bloody nose until she is willing to come to acceptable terms. Contrary to what utu asserts, the media pressure for this is already building up in Germany.
The anti-German resentment cropping up among many Eastern Europeans (basically amounting to accusations of a Molotov-Ribbentrop 2.0) is something else however, imo it crosses over into irrational hatred and is very revealing of underlying sentiments. It pisses me off, as does the frequent playing of the Nazi card and the shameless attempts at moral blackmail. Of course it's not relevant what people like me think. More interesting will be what might happen after the war (I assume a scenario where at least a major part of Ukraine will stay independent and enter into some form of association with the EU). Western shitlibs right now are the biggest supporters of Ukraine (sometimes explicitly with reasoning of the sort that Putin oppresses homosexuals and is against wokeness, so presumably they think Ukraine is somehow fighting for those causes as well, instead of just fighting a traditional struggle for national independence and sovereignty)...contradictions are overlooked or forgiven (e.g. the Ukrainian ambassador to Germany Melnyk paid a visit of honour to Stepan Bandera's grave in Munich a few years ago, when slightly criticized for it, he threw a tantrum on Twitter, how nobody, least of all Germans, would tell Ukrainians whom to regard as their heroes...yeah right, because someone like Stepan Bandera is compatible with the spirit of the EU project, lol). After the war, when Ukraine will be needing EU money for re-construction, these contradictions might come to a head.Replies: @Coconuts, @Barbarossa, @silviosilver, @Yevardian
Here in the US it is amusing.
Two years ago BLM flags were all the rage, last year the expanded LGBT+++ flag, this year it is the Ukrainian flag. The performative virtue signalling is amusing especially as one flag replaces the next as #rightcause.
The Chinese seem to say "UFO", which would make it really interesting if Russians did as well.
I think I made some comment before, how I considered UFOs to be a special American pseudo-religion. And maybe it would bear that out, if the terminology was the same in all the world's largest countries.Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @S
I don’t know about Russia. In the US, as you no doubt probably know, each letter of the term is spoken out individually in quick succession. In Britain, ‘UFO’ is spoken as a two syllable word. I’d suspect most of the rest of the world has adopted one of those two variants for their own language.
Speaking of which, there was a rather brilliant 1970 British TV series actually entitled UFO which was set in the year 1980. The premise of it was that a very great many of the people reported as ‘missing’ each year were in reality ‘alien abductees’ being ‘harvested’ by an alien race for their own dark purposes.
Though these aliens were several hundred years more advanced than humans in their technology, even so, a secret international organization (‘SHADO’) created to combat this invasion was having some sucess in stopping them.
As the leader of SHADO (a former USAF colonel named Ed Straker) explains in the series first episode entitled ‘Identified’:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/UFO_(TV_series)
How many foreign groups in Germany have reached a threshold where they exceed the number of the foreign troops barracked there, during the Cold War? Or at least greater than one side or the other?
Someone said that there are two million Russians in Germany now, which got me thinking about it. Wikipedia amusingly says 7,500,000, including “German Russians.” 2,213,000 ethnic Russians.
2-3 million of Polish descent
748,225 Romanians (2019)
4-7 million Turks.
1,401,950 from the Arab League.
DW says > 1million blacks.
Some of these are probably underestimates.
What is being said about the last minute visit to Kievof the chief of German intelligence who got caught by Russian invasion and had to evacuate from Ukraine by car to Poland? What was he trying to sell to Zelensky? To lull him that everything will be just fine, that Russians do not mean harm?
https://www.unz.com/akarlin/the-partition-of-syria/#comment-2206848
https://www.unz.com/akarlin/quantified-jq/#comment-2217296
https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-12/#comment-1886812
He is ultimately a deeply stupid person who isn't much different from the "rightoid" nutcases on UR he professes to despise, unable to think about political issues in any other way than speculation about conspiracies. Anything beyond that simply doesn't exist for him.
As for Lindner I can believe that he was an uncaring dick and expected the Ukrainians to falter immediately, and certainly legitimate criticisms of German policy towards Russia can be made (creating that level of energy dependence on Russia was very foolish). I admit I may have been mistaken about some things as well (though reading AK's increasingly unhinged chauvinist ranting did make me feel uneasy about the possible direction of Russia). If the war lasts much longer, it will probably be necessary for Germany to send heavy weapons like tanks to Ukraine, Russia needs to get a bloody nose until she is willing to come to acceptable terms. Contrary to what utu asserts, the media pressure for this is already building up in Germany.
The anti-German resentment cropping up among many Eastern Europeans (basically amounting to accusations of a Molotov-Ribbentrop 2.0) is something else however, imo it crosses over into irrational hatred and is very revealing of underlying sentiments. It pisses me off, as does the frequent playing of the Nazi card and the shameless attempts at moral blackmail. Of course it's not relevant what people like me think. More interesting will be what might happen after the war (I assume a scenario where at least a major part of Ukraine will stay independent and enter into some form of association with the EU). Western shitlibs right now are the biggest supporters of Ukraine (sometimes explicitly with reasoning of the sort that Putin oppresses homosexuals and is against wokeness, so presumably they think Ukraine is somehow fighting for those causes as well, instead of just fighting a traditional struggle for national independence and sovereignty)...contradictions are overlooked or forgiven (e.g. the Ukrainian ambassador to Germany Melnyk paid a visit of honour to Stepan Bandera's grave in Munich a few years ago, when slightly criticized for it, he threw a tantrum on Twitter, how nobody, least of all Germans, would tell Ukrainians whom to regard as their heroes...yeah right, because someone like Stepan Bandera is compatible with the spirit of the EU project, lol). After the war, when Ukraine will be needing EU money for re-construction, these contradictions might come to a head.Replies: @Coconuts, @Barbarossa, @silviosilver, @Yevardian
Quite aside from your point about EU values, assuming you are accurately reporting his comment, it doesn’t even make sense in the terms it’s offered. “Least of all the Germans” is tantamount to an accusation of hypocrisy, as though all Europeans but especially the Germans go about habitually celebrating their national heroes, therefore by what right can they tell Ukrainians not to. The truth is the exact opposite, in that no country has done more to rid itself of ethnic pride than Germany, so if anyone has the right to tell Ukrainians which historical figures they must disqualify as heroes, Germans would surely rank as being among the most up to the task, not the least.
Even the Brits, cucked as they are, can celebrate a quasi-ethnic hero like Churchill – that good old “Spitfire nationalism” is a universalist trap, but the people who get into it aren’t necessarily aware of that – and the French may not quite celebrate Napoleon but they’re not required to denounce him every day either (and they seem free enough to celebrate, say, Austerlitz in a way that Germans could never celebrate the battle of France, or even Konigsberg). The French also have Jeanne d’Arc, whom they can fly in under the radar because she was a woman, even though what really gets their juices flowing is that she was French (and unlike Churchill, there’s no obvious universalist angle from which to diminish her).
https://twitter.com/melnykandrij/status/592635676258148352?lang=de
https://twitter.com/MelnykAndrij/status/1510726492233347072
Not that I'm especially outraged about his Bandera worship, it's just funny if he thinks this could be compatible with Ukraine's aspirations for EU membership.Replies: @silviosilver
Germany sunk 2 billion Euros in Ukraine since 2014. The whole chain of events in 2014 started with the EU association agreement. If Germany had been as pro-Russian as you and utu allege, none of that would have happened.
German policy can be faulted for a lot, but as I wrote above these Molotov Ribbentropp 2.0 accusations are about pure resentment.
Konnigtratz, I meant.
Two years ago BLM flags were all the rage, last year the expanded LGBT+++ flag, this year it is the Ukrainian flag. The performative virtue signalling is amusing especially as one flag replaces the next as #rightcause.Replies: @silviosilver
A rather expensive home in my neighborhood had this enormous Ukrainian flag hung from the 2nd-storey balcony. This was right near the start of the war too. I can just imagine them excitedly googling for “giant Ukrainian flag.” (Or maybe they stitched together yellow and blue bedsheets.) Virtue signaling is always good, but nothing boosts your status like beating your peers to the punch. (Sure, there’s a small possibility they might actually be Ukrainian, but this area is swarming with rich Anglo cucks, which is what I’d bet money they are.)
You can look for yourself (from 2015 and 2022):
Not that I’m especially outraged about his Bandera worship, it’s just funny if he thinks this could be compatible with Ukraine’s aspirations for EU membership.
Someone said that there are two million Russians in Germany now, which got me thinking about it. Wikipedia amusingly says 7,500,000, including "German Russians." 2,213,000 ethnic Russians.
2-3 million of Polish descent
748,225 Romanians (2019)
4-7 million Turks.
1,401,950 from the Arab League.
DW says > 1million blacks.
Some of these are probably underestimates.Replies: @songbird
And there were only about 100,000 German troops in France, during its occupation.
One may ask why Germany was so imprudent and shortsighted. Why did they allowed themselves to liquidae their nuclear industry? Why did they let themselves to be so dependent on Russian gas? Did they really believe that Russia could become a normal country to created extended Europe from Lisbon to Vladivostok? To what extent Russian agentur in Germany (green movement, pacifists and so on) was responsible for it?Replies: @songbird, @AP, @utu, @Dmitry
Angela Merkel was a member of FDJ (Free German Youth) which was the organization that in Berlin in 1950 (four years before her birth) introduced the slogan Yankee Go Home to the world that had a very long running as one of the best hits of Soviet propaganda. How deeply did she imbibe the FDJism or what if she was some kind of agent of KGB? The surest way to get Yankee Go Home in Germany would be through some sort of German-Russian alliance.
The whole point for my comment was to state that Germany to the very end wanted to play the card that Russians won't invade but in reality it was not necessarily what they were hoping for. Their objective was to make any military aid for Ukraine seem not very urgent.Replies: @German_reader
lol, utu, our resident deep state expert about the secret world of espionage and intelligence gathering!
I don’t have any special insight about BND either, but it wouldn’t surprise me if they were much less capable than the US/UK security services. They also have to contend with Germany’s warped political culture…in 2020 there was a judicial ruling by Germany’s constitutional court whose implications might severely restrict the ability of BND to wire-tap foreigners abroad (because of “human rights”):
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urteil_des_Bundesverfassungsgerichts_zur_Ausland-Ausland-Fernmeldeaufkl%C3%A4rung_des_Bundesnachrichtendienstes
Here’s an interview with a former BND chief where he complains this might make intelligence gathering for BND near impossible:
https://www.nzz.ch/international/ex-bnd-chef-schindler-geheimdienst-muss-spielraeume-haben-ld.1583313
He also was quite pro-Russian in that interview (in 2020, “We will be happy if we have Russia on our side one day”…a reference to China?). Who knows what influence such predispositions had (you certainly don’t).
btw, I might have stayed away, but then I saw your gloating (“Two down”), and thought “Who does this imbecilic asshole think he is that he can bully away other commenters?”. You shouldn’t have been so triumphalistic.
German policy can be faulted for a lot, but as I wrote above these Molotov Ribbentropp 2.0 accusations are about pure resentment.Replies: @utu
We have been through it:
Yes, that foreign tourist website with pictures of fancy restaurants really convinced me. Keep being a useful idiot if you want.
It’s tempting to make those kinds of “jokes” from the emotional point of view or the insinuations that utu makes. Certainly, the old geopolitical realities might still be in place and Germany most likely doesn’t want to see a strong alliance between, let’s say, Poland and Ukraine (especially if all sorts of accusations are flung towards Germany). And, of course, they did not want to lose the cooperation with Russia and their perspective on Russia is different than ours. But to say that this is something akin to the 1939 handshakes is going too far, imo.
Ukraine should try to tone it down, especially since after Ursula von der Leyen’s visit, the EU perspective is starting to look more realistic (they will need to communicate with Germany about that).
There is strong support for Ukraine in German public (Klaus Meine even re-wrote his old song, replacing “Moskva” with “Ukrainian”).
And it looks like they will provide 50 tanks.
Btw, according to some analysis by Oleksiy Arestovich (he predicted the results of this invasion 7 years ago very accurately, saying that Kyiv cannot be conquered), if the West were to provide Ukraine with a sufficient amount of heavy weapons, Ukraine could push Russia all the way to the internationally recognized border of Ukraine (except Crimea). The problem is they need the whole package, including planes. Otherwise, these hostilities will be protracted.
German_reader is driven crazy by what he sees as chutzpah of Zelensky or the Ukrainian ambassador to Germany and probably even normal non-twat Germans might be irked by it; however as Russian atrocities will congeal and solidify into one coherent message in the MSM media they will overlook the impudence of Ukrainian Untermenschen and concentrate on the Russian villain.Replies: @LatW, @German_reader
Needless to say that this would cripple the bear for decades, the losses they’ve encountered in combination with these additional losses to their military would take a long time to recover especially with sanctions in place.
civilians officially.Thanks for posting the link.Replies: @Mikhail
The link shows Kiev regime provocation shortly before the Russian action.
LOLReplies: @Yevardian
You misunderstand my point either from maliciousnous or stupidity. Poland is the only country that consistently supports Hungary within the EU. Alienating Poland is quite an achievement within the context of two semi-pariahs within the EU of centuries of Hungarian-Polish friendship.
Iyi geceler, Yevardian. Get some sleep. You sound like you need it.
Collectively the laws related to "collective punishment " Indeed I am aware that you are devilish, wishing to misdirect the conversation via irrelevant detail. You confirmed my suspicion by whining about minutiae instead of dealing with facts.
PEACE 😇Replies: @Mr. Hack
Detail is something that you like to omit, because you know that you’re wrong in this instance. Ukraine never was and is not today obligated to provide water to the Crimea. Nobody’s died because of a lack of Ukrainian water. They’ve been getting their water elsewhere and have managed to survive. I’ve brushed up on the meaning of “collective punishment” and am unable to find even one instance where the curtailment of water via a canal is considered to fit the meaning of this term. Ukraine has been at war with the usurping government in Crimea and has been so for at least 8 years. It certainly is today and should feel no compunction in making the lives easier for these recalcitrant denizens, nor feel any guilt for not creating a garden paradise for this area. Human rights violations within Crimea are pointed towards Russia and not Ukraine, and not a whimper from you? There are rules and laws put into place that help individuals and countries settle their grievances amicably. There has been no effort on the Russian side to settle their issues with Ukraine in a good face manner from the very beginning, just authoritarian bluster followed-up by military seizure and fiat.
It is extremely clear, to anyone not blinded by *copium*, that depriving farmers of water was intended to punish the population of Crimea.
-- Do you deny that the Ukrainian government intend harm (a.k.a. punishment)?
-- Do you deny that that the harm was intended to a group (a.k.a. collective)?
Retreating into technicalities of legalism demonstrates your absence of morality. You are trapped by your own mouth frothing, deranged hatred. Alas, I cannot help you with a defect in your soul.
PEACE 😇Replies: @Mr. Hack
One of my spiritual teachers had a saying. " We are not permitted to say that our way is the only way, but only that it is a good way."
This being taken into account, I think it is still possible and necessary to attempt to distinguish between things which are good, and things which lack good. It is not an easy thing and I won't pretend that my views on it are absolute. I'm sure that I, as is the case with us all, am wrong about a variety of things.
When one looks at the modern world it certainly appears that it is lacking for a great many people. I have a friend who worked in the health department of the local university. She said that about 60% of the student body was on some sort of psych medication or another, often times multiples. Anti-anxiety, anti-depressants etc. This blew me away, since these are people who haven't even begun to deal with life as full fledged adults, and who represent an overwhelmingly affluent and privileged student body. This is just one small data point, but how can one look at a society which produces these outcomes and not see an issue?
Or lets go back to your previous point about all things originating from humans being natural. Can you really say that synthetic pesticides which kill the biome of the soil to such an extent that it becomes dead and inert can be considered "natural" or be worthy of non-judgment just because they exist?
The question that I would pose to you, is a t what point does absolute non-judgement become a form of moral cowardice?Replies: @Triteleia Laxa
If the person who thinks they are “not judging” actually is “judging,” but is deceiving themselves on their deeper thought processes then this is a form of cowardice.
But “judgement” itself is also a form of cowardice, though lesser than more obvious ways of lying to yourself.
Judgement stems from not “understanding.” If you truly understand, you’ll see how the other is unable to be any different at the moment. They are truly trying their best, even when they don’t realise it, which is possible because eople are multi-layered, and they are often unacquainted with the deeper parts of themselves.
Having said this, a lack of understanding of “the other” is not enough to cause such judgement. The “judge” also needs to “suffer” from a surplus of “pride.”
For example, I often don’t understand why people are as they are, especially if I don’t know them, but I appreciate that, because I don’t know them, I have less information on them than they do, and so I am in too informationally limited a place to judge.
In other words, the courage of having humility also lessens judgement.
Another key point is that “pure love” is “understanding.” Or perhaps pure understanding is love.
So while it is true that no one honest can claim to love everyone, as we are not God undivided, we can still accept the fact that without loving the other we are not in a place to judge and also accept that when we do love another, truly, in the moment, we necessarily do not judge them.
And of course, as with all these things, we can substitute our inner selves for “the other” and the words apply equally.
In fact, this attitude needs to be turned inwards first, for so many.
Continuing, this doesn’t all mean that we can’t say “good” and “bad”, but it does mean that our preferences, our dislikes and likes are not to be confused with some moral objectivity. We should not speak in God’s voice, though we can sing along with our own tune, should we be able to harmonise.
Furthermore, when using “good” and “bad” non-judgementally, which is with love, we are seeing the world from the the other’s perspective as much as our own and are then trying to untangle their contradictions, rather than admonishing them. To point them in the direction of freedom from their fear, rather than forcing them along the road or telling them that it is hopeless and that they have failed.
For example, you can see my harsh comments in many places on this board, but I honestly believe, that even the harshest and seemingly most childish, come from a place of non-judgementalism.
They are instead to remind, or even shock, the people on the receiving end that they are caught in their own contradictions and that their self-judgement, which is usually what causes those contradictions to tangle up, is undermining their deeper needs.
And the only way you can know this of another is to take on their pain and feel it, as you can only truly know what you experience.
And so, by feeling it, no matter how abrasive the language, you are sharing in their problem and thereby making it your own as well. Which puts you in a place to suggest, even meanly, but never to judge, for you are there with them.
This is understanding and encouragement, and does not push distance with “the other” but makes an intimacy.
It also brings you back to yourself, for now you understand where you too are at, better, and will be more at peace.
I am not a relativist, even though I think morality is a simplistic semi-fiction.
Ultimately, morality is just people doing their best to try to understand and describe what is in their heart, but with much loss of truth, when it would be more accurate if they could simply see and follow their heart, but they cannot yet for they are gripped with fear.
Rather tragically this fear is often caused by the brokenness of morality when trying to describe truth, though it can also be because they have fear and no simple handrails of morality to guide them while they learn.
There is no easy answer for how people can arrive at truth and clear-sightedness, but all people will, in their own way. Every path will be individual, just as every individual is key to supporting others. This is not relativism. It is understanding, love and the beauty of existence. Doing your best is never “bad”, even if it involves doing “bad.” It is just yet another step on the path to “better,” and everything would be very boring and uninformative if there was only “perfect” and no “better”.
As we only know what we experience, so this world is valuable in its awfulness, its misery and its suffering. On a timescale of infinity, what really do these things matter, except we get to learn them? Even though they therefore matter infinitely, because we have the wondrous fulfillment of learning them!
When I was a kid, I wondered if you could have a "perfect" society in which no one lied, but I quickly realized that some people (eg me) would figure out lying can be advantageous and that some of them would be caught in their lies, which would encourage others to try their luck with falsehood and so on, and the whole thing would fall apart. Similarly here: some people will take advantage of your willingness to forgive, and just keep fucking society over, knowing that our supposed "moral superiors" will foolishly keep extending forgiveness. Imagine your own reaction to someone else trying to justify criticisms they'd made of one of the parties in this war in this way. We'd wear out our mouse wheels after scrolling through your reply to that one.
I think that it is possible for people to choose a better path and that they are not necessarily doing the best they can in any given moment. Speaking personally, there are plenty of times when I feel the pull toward the lazy way or destructive way and choose otherwise. Or sometimes not as the case may be. We are habitual creatures heavily shaped by our experiences so it becomes very easy to fall into behavioral ruts, whether for good or bad. The path is laid by countless small choices that nudge us one way or another. I see human behavior as something of a flywheel; it operates on momentum but it is possible to slow the wheel or even change direction given enough impetus after the other directional motion slows and stops. I do believe that we have agency though, though usually progress in any direction is a very incremental process of tiny choices.
I understand your points on judgement and would agree that it is important to not fall into the trap of judging people. I don't think that it is possible to call any individual evil, for example, be it Hitler or Stalin. It is however possible to say that their actions</i were bad. So I would say that there is a critical difference between having compassion for even the most twisted individual and so refraining from judgement of them and being able to judge their actions.
But sadly, I do not agree with the idea that all people are on their individual path to truth and clear sightedness. Too often people are on a path of doubling down on poor decisions and blindness. Unless you are speaking about the possibility of reincarnation or the trans migration of souls. In this lifetime anyhow, there are many who will many who will probably and sometimes willfully not learn a thing. Perhaps this will be a lesson in itself if they come back around.
On your own comments to be quite honest, I often get the feeling that you are projecting a persona of being "above it all" so that you can slag people with some impunity. However, this is just my impression and I don't count it as definitive. Perhaps you really do believe yourself to be saying some things from a position of "love", though in my experience such confrontational approaches only harden the undesirable mental attitude. I put even less store in the impressions gathered of people on the internet than in real life since it is a very one dimensional and deceptive format, so I make no real judgement of you or any other commenter here as a person. I just have the impressions I accrue, which I take with an appropriate grain of salt.
However, to get back to the basis of what started this existential discussion it baffles me as to how curtly calling AaronB "soulless" and criticizing his personal search for truth and meaning is supposed to be edifying in any way. And at the heart of it all, it is possible to not judge people or human organizations for the terrible and destructive choices that they may make without seemingly condoning it as "natural" or "good".
https://www.unz.com/akarlin/the-partition-of-syria/#comment-2206848
https://www.unz.com/akarlin/quantified-jq/#comment-2217296
https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-12/#comment-1886812
He is ultimately a deeply stupid person who isn't much different from the "rightoid" nutcases on UR he professes to despise, unable to think about political issues in any other way than speculation about conspiracies. Anything beyond that simply doesn't exist for him.
As for Lindner I can believe that he was an uncaring dick and expected the Ukrainians to falter immediately, and certainly legitimate criticisms of German policy towards Russia can be made (creating that level of energy dependence on Russia was very foolish). I admit I may have been mistaken about some things as well (though reading AK's increasingly unhinged chauvinist ranting did make me feel uneasy about the possible direction of Russia). If the war lasts much longer, it will probably be necessary for Germany to send heavy weapons like tanks to Ukraine, Russia needs to get a bloody nose until she is willing to come to acceptable terms. Contrary to what utu asserts, the media pressure for this is already building up in Germany.
The anti-German resentment cropping up among many Eastern Europeans (basically amounting to accusations of a Molotov-Ribbentrop 2.0) is something else however, imo it crosses over into irrational hatred and is very revealing of underlying sentiments. It pisses me off, as does the frequent playing of the Nazi card and the shameless attempts at moral blackmail. Of course it's not relevant what people like me think. More interesting will be what might happen after the war (I assume a scenario where at least a major part of Ukraine will stay independent and enter into some form of association with the EU). Western shitlibs right now are the biggest supporters of Ukraine (sometimes explicitly with reasoning of the sort that Putin oppresses homosexuals and is against wokeness, so presumably they think Ukraine is somehow fighting for those causes as well, instead of just fighting a traditional struggle for national independence and sovereignty)...contradictions are overlooked or forgiven (e.g. the Ukrainian ambassador to Germany Melnyk paid a visit of honour to Stepan Bandera's grave in Munich a few years ago, when slightly criticized for it, he threw a tantrum on Twitter, how nobody, least of all Germans, would tell Ukrainians whom to regard as their heroes...yeah right, because someone like Stepan Bandera is compatible with the spirit of the EU project, lol). After the war, when Ukraine will be needing EU money for re-construction, these contradictions might come to a head.Replies: @Coconuts, @Barbarossa, @silviosilver, @Yevardian
Well it’s certainly some very creative Quellenforschung. Although I remember Nikolai Starikov saying very similar things years ago. Remember how all major Western leaders had all finally admitted how ‘multiculturism has failed’ around 2014 (iirc), and then after Syria it was all suddenly forgotten? Of course, it could easily just be politicians being convinctionless swine, but I wouldn’t discount additional motives.
Did you see that comment by the German finance minister that ‘giving Ukraine weapons would be a total waste of money, because it would fold in two days?’ or something along those lines.
I mean, honestly I was thinking the same thing in February, and I was strongly biased by deteriorating Armenian situation (we are all ethnic grifters), but then we all saw the actual respective of the Ukrainian and Russian forces. But the German government would surely be better informed on such matters and of course has its own motivations.
“Ukraine should try to tone it down” – I agree because Ukraine needs help from everybody even form the the unfortunate and now somewhat contrite signatory of the Molotov-Ribbentrop 2.0 pact. The difference between Molotov-Ribbentrop 2.0 and 1.0 versions is that the useful idiots switched their places.
German_reader is driven crazy by what he sees as chutzpah of Zelensky or the Ukrainian ambassador to Germany and probably even normal non-twat Germans might be irked by it; however as Russian atrocities will congeal and solidify into one coherent message in the MSM media they will overlook the impudence of Ukrainian Untermenschen and concentrate on the Russian villain.
They also had something about Buryat troops quartered on civilian property...one soldier at first wanted to rape the 14-year old daughter of a family, but then settled for the mother, while the grandmother had to watch. Really amazing that Russian soldiers are apparently still the ill-disciplined rabble they have always been, I have to admit I was somewhat surprised about this, because I had bought the propaganda that the Russian army nowadays is more professional.
You're right that these kind of stories (which are objectively bad, even if one thinks talk of "genocide" is over-blown, there is no real way to defend the conduct of the Russian soldiers involved) will have an effect. Which I have never denied btw, but then what I'm actually writing hasn't mattered to you for some time.Replies: @AP, @Yevardian
But haven’t Russian imperialists claimed that for a long time (regarding WW1, that Ukrainians were “invented” by the Austrians and Germans to weaken and dismember Russia)? I don’t know much about the nationalities conflict in the late 19th century (when books in Ukrainian were banned iirc), maybe such ideas were already current then as a justification for Russification policies.
But the structural similarities you cite are interesting…maybe could be used as an argument against CRT.
Was that in reference to a specific event (Rapallo?) or a more general theory?
I just realized what Hell will be like.
Only AaronB, Triteleia Laxa, utu, A123, songbird and the like will be allowed to speak or write and we will be compelled to listen or read 24/7.
I had your Hell pegged as a place where classical music assaults your ears, while your bong is always just out of reach. But it is nice to know that my Unz corpus will be used, in conjunction with that of certain others, as an instrument by Beelzebub to scourge you for your manifold sins.
Sentencing Triteleia Laxa and utu to an eternity writing comments in a forum where they're the only two commenters might actually be a very appropriate punishment however, given that these two have such a predilection for analysing the alleged personality flaws of other commenters...just imagine if they had only each other for that kind of game, forever! You could write a sort of modern myth about it, like about Tantalus and Sysiphos.Replies: @Yahya
And now ask: why do you put yourself in your own personal hell? What is it you realise you need from this place?Replies: @iffen
German_reader is driven crazy by what he sees as chutzpah of Zelensky or the Ukrainian ambassador to Germany and probably even normal non-twat Germans might be irked by it; however as Russian atrocities will congeal and solidify into one coherent message in the MSM media they will overlook the impudence of Ukrainian Untermenschen and concentrate on the Russian villain.Replies: @LatW, @German_reader
He’s not being diplomatic (he may be a diverse male, too, as there are many such in the diplomatic corps and they aren’t always able to control themselves). However, they are desperate and it is understandable. And the Germans shouldn’t lecture about Bandera. The whole Western world is pleading if you look at what’s happening on the ground. Another thing is that there are cultural differences between Germans and East Slavs. The East Slavs are way more direct in their communication (it doesn’t mean they’re low IQ, the relatively high Ukrainian IQ has actually helped them in this war). This directness could actually help in the future if they get a shot at the EU membership, but don’t want to accept the wokeness. They can just directly state that.
More atrocities will be revealed in Mariupol and other places. There are many people under the rubble as well. Those who support Ukraine must brace themselves (get enough sleep & water).
https://twitter.com/melnykandrij/status/592635676258148352?lang=de
https://twitter.com/MelnykAndrij/status/1510726492233347072
Not that I'm especially outraged about his Bandera worship, it's just funny if he thinks this could be compatible with Ukraine's aspirations for EU membership.Replies: @silviosilver
It may not be as weird as you think. This conflict has a number of parallels with the Yugoslav wars. Western media very quickly settled on a black-and-white morality play interpretation: evil and traditional Serbs and evil and traditional Russians, both led by “the new Hitler,” versus virtuous and liberal Croats, Bosnians and Albanians then and, today, virtuous and woke Ukrainians. And in both cases the virtuous actors not only failed to distance themselves from WWII collaborators but actively celebrated them – Croatia’s president was even an actual holocaust revisionist. Good PR can go a long way – the name “Ruder Finn” in Serbnat circles has attained the mythical status that “Bilderberg” holds in anti-globalist conspiracy theories – but it’s quite breathtaking what western elites are willing to turn a blind eye to, given the browbeating they regularly deliver to their own denizens about ethnonationalism.
But "judgement" itself is also a form of cowardice, though lesser than more obvious ways of lying to yourself.
Judgement stems from not "understanding." If you truly understand, you'll see how the other is unable to be any different at the moment. They are truly trying their best, even when they don't realise it, which is possible because eople are multi-layered, and they are often unacquainted with the deeper parts of themselves.
Having said this, a lack of understanding of "the other" is not enough to cause such judgement. The "judge" also needs to "suffer" from a surplus of "pride."
For example, I often don't understand why people are as they are, especially if I don't know them, but I appreciate that, because I don't know them, I have less information on them than they do, and so I am in too informationally limited a place to judge.
In other words, the courage of having humility also lessens judgement.
Another key point is that "pure love" is "understanding." Or perhaps pure understanding is love.
So while it is true that no one honest can claim to love everyone, as we are not God undivided, we can still accept the fact that without loving the other we are not in a place to judge and also accept that when we do love another, truly, in the moment, we necessarily do not judge them.
And of course, as with all these things, we can substitute our inner selves for "the other" and the words apply equally.
In fact, this attitude needs to be turned inwards first, for so many.
Continuing, this doesn't all mean that we can't say "good" and "bad", but it does mean that our preferences, our dislikes and likes are not to be confused with some moral objectivity. We should not speak in God's voice, though we can sing along with our own tune, should we be able to harmonise.
Furthermore, when using "good" and "bad" non-judgementally, which is with love, we are seeing the world from the the other's perspective as much as our own and are then trying to untangle their contradictions, rather than admonishing them. To point them in the direction of freedom from their fear, rather than forcing them along the road or telling them that it is hopeless and that they have failed.
For example, you can see my harsh comments in many places on this board, but I honestly believe, that even the harshest and seemingly most childish, come from a place of non-judgementalism.
They are instead to remind, or even shock, the people on the receiving end that they are caught in their own contradictions and that their self-judgement, which is usually what causes those contradictions to tangle up, is undermining their deeper needs.
And the only way you can know this of another is to take on their pain and feel it, as you can only truly know what you experience.
And so, by feeling it, no matter how abrasive the language, you are sharing in their problem and thereby making it your own as well. Which puts you in a place to suggest, even meanly, but never to judge, for you are there with them.
This is understanding and encouragement, and does not push distance with "the other" but makes an intimacy.
It also brings you back to yourself, for now you understand where you too are at, better, and will be more at peace.
I am not a relativist, even though I think morality is a simplistic semi-fiction.
Ultimately, morality is just people doing their best to try to understand and describe what is in their heart, but with much loss of truth, when it would be more accurate if they could simply see and follow their heart, but they cannot yet for they are gripped with fear.
Rather tragically this fear is often caused by the brokenness of morality when trying to describe truth, though it can also be because they have fear and no simple handrails of morality to guide them while they learn.
There is no easy answer for how people can arrive at truth and clear-sightedness, but all people will, in their own way. Every path will be individual, just as every individual is key to supporting others. This is not relativism. It is understanding, love and the beauty of existence. Doing your best is never "bad", even if it involves doing "bad." It is just yet another step on the path to "better," and everything would be very boring and uninformative if there was only "perfect" and no "better".
As we only know what we experience, so this world is valuable in its awfulness, its misery and its suffering. On a timescale of infinity, what really do these things matter, except we get to learn them? Even though they therefore matter infinitely, because we have the wondrous fulfillment of learning them!Replies: @silviosilver, @Barbarossa
Relatedly, “to understand all, is to forgive all.” Meaning, I take it, that if you could truly understand what it was about a person’s predicament that made their decision to act a certain way seem like a good idea at the time, you would feel inclined to forgive them for it. Pretty words, but impractical, I think.
When I was a kid, I wondered if you could have a “perfect” society in which no one lied, but I quickly realized that some people (eg me) would figure out lying can be advantageous and that some of them would be caught in their lies, which would encourage others to try their luck with falsehood and so on, and the whole thing would fall apart. Similarly here: some people will take advantage of your willingness to forgive, and just keep fucking society over, knowing that our supposed “moral superiors” will foolishly keep extending forgiveness.
Imagine your own reaction to someone else trying to justify criticisms they’d made of one of the parties in this war in this way. We’d wear out our mouse wheels after scrolling through your reply to that one.
This theme has been similar to what I said before the war, but worse. Be pessimistic about this region, and reality will even more pessimistic.
It’s not retrofitting, it’s just a result of us (including myself) in the forum, having low knowledge level about military.
If we knew the Russian air force has no targeting pods so cannot attack the moving targets (as well as very few guided weapons even for fixed targets), or that the expensive new drones are made from mixing things they purchased from Japanese toy model shops.
But we are not military experts. Because of not having much knowledge, I generalized from the Azerbaijan army (which was modernized). Of course, this is naïve – it’s like expecting an exception to the rule “I know they steal from everything, but somehow not from here” (even as I saw the managers in the military industry’s Instagrams in Monaco).
By comparison, unlike bored office workers with no connection to this area, Ukrainian authorities would have studied the topic and they know more before the war, how the Russian army is still in the 1970s. The relative difference of Armenia vs Azerbaijan is not relevant here. Ukraine is not doing some irrational Warsaw Uprising. Conventional military conflict of Ukraine and Russia is quite equally matched, especially in the technology level.
German_reader is driven crazy by what he sees as chutzpah of Zelensky or the Ukrainian ambassador to Germany and probably even normal non-twat Germans might be irked by it; however as Russian atrocities will congeal and solidify into one coherent message in the MSM media they will overlook the impudence of Ukrainian Untermenschen and concentrate on the Russian villain.Replies: @LatW, @German_reader
That is already happening. SPIEGEL had a cover story about Russian war crimes last Saturday. Now SPIEGEL is a pretty terrible shitlib magazine and I disliked the tone of much of their reporting, but the basic account of what happened in Bucha was actually quite plausible. Apparently the first armoured Russian column that entered the town was shot to pieces, with some civilians joining the fight. When the Russians came for the second time, they basically just shot a lot of men whom they suspected of potentially resisting (e.g. by sending coordinates of Russian troops to the Ukrainian military via text message, so going around with a mobile phone was a potential death sentence) or whose looks they didn’t like. So maybe somewhat akin to what German troops did in Belgium in 1914.
They also had something about Buryat troops quartered on civilian property…one soldier at first wanted to rape the 14-year old daughter of a family, but then settled for the mother, while the grandmother had to watch. Really amazing that Russian soldiers are apparently still the ill-disciplined rabble they have always been, I have to admit I was somewhat surprised about this, because I had bought the propaganda that the Russian army nowadays is more professional.
You’re right that these kind of stories (which are objectively bad, even if one thinks talk of “genocide” is over-blown, there is no real way to defend the conduct of the Russian soldiers involved) will have an effect. Which I have never denied btw, but then what I’m actually writing hasn’t mattered to you for some time.
Thank God most of my family in Bucha who survived the first night of fighting (hiding in the basement as the mayhem erupted) in that city managed to escape when the Ukrainians retook the town, before the Russians came back and took the town over later.Replies: @German_reader, @utu
https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/world-news/russian-soldiers-genitals-amputated-after-26657628
Don't be surprised. I recall there was some PR shakeup of the military administration after this incident (it was too extreme even Russian state media to ignore), but after things had settled, nobody important was fired, just 'reshuffled'. Though how then-defense minister Sergei Ivanov handled it and allowed it happen played a large part in frustrating his ambition to become Prime Minister (instead went to his rival Medvedev, apparently they both personally despise each other). Army staff later complained that Ivanov's successor as defense minister, Serdyukov apparently filled the army with 'female bean-counters' or something like that, so he was replaced with Shoigu, who was welcomed by brass for restoring 'traditional norms' in the army culture (whatever that means).
And overall, I don't know why I expected the Russian army to perform better, though I definitely expected the Ukrainian one to perform worse, as it suffers from similar problems. The human capital that goes into the Russian army now is in fact, far lower than it was during the Soviet Union, both because Soviet conscription casted a much wider net, and a military career was held in much higher esteem then than now.
Also, Hungary depends on Polish veto for any anti-Hungarian EU policies.
Which might explain why Hungary is more comfortable staking out a position which would isolate them, since the bar to prevent any such action is now much higher than it used to be.
Article 7, which would remove a country's voting rights within the EU still needs a unanimous vote, but such a step is seen as so extreme that is not under discussion.
Hungary has pursued a very pro-Russian energy policy. Orban flew to Moscow early in the crisis to ensure gas supplies. He has also partnered with Rosatom to expand their nuclear plant at Paks. Interestingly, he managed to get EU subsidies for the project (this was before the war). Indeed, even Germany has not gone this far.Replies: @Yevardian
Only AaronB, Triteleia Laxa, utu, A123, songbird and the like will be allowed to speak or write and we will be compelled to listen or read 24/7.Replies: @songbird, @German_reader, @Barbarossa, @utu, @Triteleia Laxa
Well, shucks, iffen!
I had your Hell pegged as a place where classical music assaults your ears, while your bong is always just out of reach. But it is nice to know that my Unz corpus will be used, in conjunction with that of certain others, as an instrument by Beelzebub to scourge you for your manifold sins.
They also had something about Buryat troops quartered on civilian property...one soldier at first wanted to rape the 14-year old daughter of a family, but then settled for the mother, while the grandmother had to watch. Really amazing that Russian soldiers are apparently still the ill-disciplined rabble they have always been, I have to admit I was somewhat surprised about this, because I had bought the propaganda that the Russian army nowadays is more professional.
You're right that these kind of stories (which are objectively bad, even if one thinks talk of "genocide" is over-blown, there is no real way to defend the conduct of the Russian soldiers involved) will have an effect. Which I have never denied btw, but then what I'm actually writing hasn't mattered to you for some time.Replies: @AP, @Yevardian
The Russian behavior in Bucha strongly suggests that the stories of Russian brutality in Germany after World War II were mostly true.
Thank God most of my family in Bucha who survived the first night of fighting (hiding in the basement as the mayhem erupted) in that city managed to escape when the Ukrainians retook the town, before the Russians came back and took the town over later.
I admit I thought it might no longer be the case (because Russia is so shiny and modern now, and its armed forced presumably professional), but apparently it still is.Replies: @Wokechoke, @Barbarossa
Here are two new interviews with Scott Ritter I’d recommend. Individuals should decide for themselves, but he comes across as highly credible to me:
Video Link
Video Link
But the structural similarities you cite are interesting...maybe could be used as an argument against CRT. Was that in reference to a specific event (Rapallo?) or a more general theory?Replies: @AP
Before blaming the Austrians and Germans, Russians blamed the Poles.
Thank God most of my family in Bucha who survived the first night of fighting (hiding in the basement as the mayhem erupted) in that city managed to escape when the Ukrainians retook the town, before the Russians came back and took the town over later.Replies: @German_reader, @utu
imo it’s plausible that Russian soldiers are always doing such things when given the chance, because they are brutalized by their officers and fellow soldiers (dedovshchina) and then take their frustration out on civilians as soon as the brutal discipline is even slightly relaxed.
I admit I thought it might no longer be the case (because Russia is so shiny and modern now, and its armed forced presumably professional), but apparently it still is.
I think that in many ways wartime can be understood as a completely disconnected psychic territory where all the rules of civilization have been abrogated and this easily unleashes the worst in people. This is why the code of the warrior or chivalry was so important in the past. Even if it wasn't always followed, it provided an ideal to help mitigate the outflow of human barbarism during wartime.Replies: @German_reader
Only AaronB, Triteleia Laxa, utu, A123, songbird and the like will be allowed to speak or write and we will be compelled to listen or read 24/7.Replies: @songbird, @German_reader, @Barbarossa, @utu, @Triteleia Laxa
That’s pretty unfair to songbird and AaronB, and to some extent even to A123 (at least he’s entertaining).
Sentencing Triteleia Laxa and utu to an eternity writing comments in a forum where they’re the only two commenters might actually be a very appropriate punishment however, given that these two have such a predilection for analysing the alleged personality flaws of other commenters…just imagine if they had only each other for that kind of game, forever! You could write a sort of modern myth about it, like about Tantalus and Sysiphos.
The hyper specificity of your response shows the weakness of your position. Ultra narrow research on the term “canal” was intended to avoid finding a match. Why not “water”? Or, “dam”? Your ludicrous gamesmanship is painfully transparent.
It is extremely clear, to anyone not blinded by *copium*, that depriving farmers of water was intended to punish the population of Crimea.
— Do you deny that the Ukrainian government intend harm (a.k.a. punishment)?
— Do you deny that that the harm was intended to a group (a.k.a. collective)?
Retreating into technicalities of legalism demonstrates your absence of morality. You are trapped by your own mouth frothing, deranged hatred. Alas, I cannot help you with a defect in your soul.
PEACE 😇
- Do you deny that the harm was intended to a group (a.k.a) collective)?Replies: @A123
It’s not patriotisim. It is because of poverty. Salaries of professional soldiers in the Russian army are low, so they are attractive for people in poor regions which are depopulating and deindustrializing.
You can see the job adverts and try to calculate how “wealthy” you can be. If you want to be a soldier, you can be paid $4500 per year before tax (under $4000 per year after tax) https://ekaterinburg.hh.ru/vacancy/52890259 You can imagine the hourly salary, maybe under $1,5 per hour.
Prices for things like food in Russia, are the same in the bargain supermarkets of the West (I can match the prices in bargain supermarkets). Much of the places of Russia, there are few jobs with livable salary, few career possibilities for young men, so this is their option.
So, maybe it will not sound so bad, 3 hours of working as a professional soldier = 1 jar of Nutella.
Lol this was Putin’s recent talk (March 3). Of course, it is more romantic than, if you said they are contractors because there are few jobs or industry for young people in their regions.
Putin said, “When I see examples of such heroism as the feat of a young man — Nurmagomed Gadzhimagomedov, a native of Dagestan, a Lak by nationality, our other soldiers, I want to say: I am a Lak, I am a Dagestani, I am a Chechen, Ingush, Russian, Tatar, Jew, Mordvin, Ossetian.” Putin said, stressing that it is simply impossible to list all of Russia’s more than 300 national and ethnic groups. “I am proud that I am part of this world, part of the mighty, strong and multinational people of Russia. At the same time, I will never give up my belief that Russians and Ukrainians are one people. Even despite that some residents of Ukraine are intimidated, many are fooled by Nazi, nationalist propaganda, and someone consciously, of course, follow the path of Bandera.”
https://gazetaingush.ru/news/gorzhus-tem-chto-ya-chast-moguchego-silnogo-mnogonacionalnogo-naroda-rossii-putin
It is extremely clear, to anyone not blinded by *copium*, that depriving farmers of water was intended to punish the population of Crimea.
-- Do you deny that the Ukrainian government intend harm (a.k.a. punishment)?
-- Do you deny that that the harm was intended to a group (a.k.a. collective)?
Retreating into technicalities of legalism demonstrates your absence of morality. You are trapped by your own mouth frothing, deranged hatred. Alas, I cannot help you with a defect in your soul.
PEACE 😇Replies: @Mr. Hack
Well, why not widen the meaning just a little bit further (to please your need for a wider definition) and make the US and other countries around the world also guilty of “collective punishment” when they laden poor little Russia with sanctions? Certainly you’re not going to selectively cry wolf here, are you? After all:
– Do you deny that the US government is intending harm (a.k.a. punishment)?
– Do you deny that the harm was intended to a group (a.k.a) collective)?
Thank you for conceding my key point.
PEACE 😇Replies: @Mr. Hack
- Do you deny that the harm was intended to a group (a.k.a) collective)?Replies: @A123
This is ground we have already covered… “Others did it too” does not work as justification. It is an admission of guilt.
Thank you for conceding my key point.
PEACE 😇
It’s evidenced o’ war.
I admit I thought it might no longer be the case (because Russia is so shiny and modern now, and its armed forced presumably professional), but apparently it still is.Replies: @Wokechoke, @Barbarossa
There’s a racial element too. Lots of Mongols.
I believe it is a second-generation ATGM. It’s like TOW but it has a video screen (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BGM-71_TOW)
Azerbaijan was using 5th generation ATGMs (purchased from abroad). Azerbaijan’s situation was such overkill in 2020. Their anti-tank missiles can change between targets while they are flying https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b711ULgfr2A.
Azerbaijan has been integrating this expensive equipment for years. They could buy it with billions of petrodollars, while Ukraine is receiving equipment recently (except Javelins) which they can use with short-term training.
A lot of Ukraine’s use of drones (excluding Bayraktar), are just consumer drones like DJI phantom, which they modify to throw small grenades (https://inews.co.uk/news/ukraine-diy-arms-industry-improvised-grenade-launcher-3d-printed-bombs-1544011).
It’s similar technology to Syrian rebels and Islamic State in Syria (I think Islamic State are the first to use this method of throwing grenades from consumer drones).
Ukraine also produces laser guided artillery shells (https://ukroboronprom.com.ua/en/product/kvitnik).
They modify the laser aimer on the consumer drones, and this use of the consumer drones then guides some artillery attacks.
It is 21st century, but many are improvised 21st century consumer products. Not like Azerbaijan, had the most expensive hi-tech drones, and which have years of integrating them.
To write pedantically, Kalibr cruise missiles are really toys of 1980s Sverdlovsk. They were designed under Lev Lyulyev (he was born in 1908 in Kiev), as a possible nuclear delivery system. Soviet Union designed and tested in 1983. In the 1990s, there was not finance available to complete the project, integrate them or attain their entry to service, so they were not available in the Chechen Wars. They use satellite navigation and are used against fixed targets. So (unlike loitering drones) you need to know already what the target is, before you use them, and of course they are very expensive (they were originally developed for tactical nuclear warheads).
It’s really hard for me to understand why you are always going on about the Azeri 2020 result as if it’s some great “victory” showcasing what a fine and truly modern army can do.
Reviewing the basic facts of this war. Azeri losses according to their own MoD are 2900 Azeri’s + 400 Syrian KIA’s. Armenia says 7600 KIA’s combined for them but let’s go with 3300. With these losses they basically took ~3000 square Km’s of crappy territory with rocky/poor soil and no known resources that wasnt even recognized or fully defended by Armenia. Azerbaijan started to invasion with about 17k troops including mercs and I’m sure had some extra troops for rotation.
Russia meanwhile invaded Ukraine proper (including a failed attempt to take the capital) with about 220-240k troops including Donbass separatists and probably 80-100k contract rotational forces available. It’s overall population and force availability was almost exactly 15x that of Azerbaijan. On a population and combat force adjusted basis Azeri dead were roughly 50k to get the result they got. Credible Russian KIA estimates are currently 5k-20k so let’s say 12.5k as a midpoint. They are currently sitting at 1/4th Azeri losses on a pop/combat force adjusted basis. At that cost they are sitting on 83,000 square km’s of newly taken territory in East Ukraine that has some of the richest farmland in the world and significant to very significant reserves of coal, gas, lithium, magnesium, iron ore, uranium, etc.
Interestingly Russia to Ukraine and Azerbijan to Armenia are proportionally very comparable in population and economic size. 150M (including LNR/DNR) to 36M vs 10M to 3M and both larger countries also have higher gdp per capita. In NK war Armenia had better defensive terrain but in RU/UA war UA has massive arms support from the West. Obviously not over yet but Russia’s battlefield result seems superior so far.
One may ask why Germany was so imprudent and shortsighted. Why did they allowed themselves to liquidae their nuclear industry? Why did they let themselves to be so dependent on Russian gas? Did they really believe that Russia could become a normal country to created extended Europe from Lisbon to Vladivostok? To what extent Russian agentur in Germany (green movement, pacifists and so on) was responsible for it?Replies: @songbird, @AP, @utu, @Dmitry
I’m surprised by the focus of criticism of Ukrainians against only Germany, while they do not seem very worried that France has been more of a supporter of the Russian military.
For example, the newest tanks (T-72B3M) have French (Thales) electronics and optics inside.
–
Germany’s desire to maintain good relations, is likely economics. Postwar Germany prioritizes its industry and exports. For a small example, Chechnya is destination region, of a significant flow of the Maybach factory. Of course, Germany’s industries are so world successful, they can easily afford to remove supplies to unfashionable regions. But their default setting or inclination is, they like to maximize their export markets.
Sentencing Triteleia Laxa and utu to an eternity writing comments in a forum where they're the only two commenters might actually be a very appropriate punishment however, given that these two have such a predilection for analysing the alleged personality flaws of other commenters...just imagine if they had only each other for that kind of game, forever! You could write a sort of modern myth about it, like about Tantalus and Sysiphos.Replies: @Yahya
No, it’s not. All that nutcase does is write substanceless, idiotic musings on various issues in which he is incapable of seeing beyond an extreme, imbecilic racialist lens. Add to that his deranged obsession with blacks, and you get the most contemptible human trash on this site whose only redeeming trait is a sense of humor (which only just prevents him from being relegated into subhuman territory).
Thank God most of my family in Bucha who survived the first night of fighting (hiding in the basement as the mayhem erupted) in that city managed to escape when the Ukrainians retook the town, before the Russians came back and took the town over later.Replies: @German_reader, @utu
About 1/3rd of all brutalities of Red Army in Germany during and after WWII were committed by Ukrainians who served in Red Army. If you want do sneak in an idea that Ukrainians are somewhat civilizationally superior to Russians, which I doubt you believe yourself, I think any misgivings Germans or Poles and people like even the twat GR or expressed here by LatW few comments before have about Ukrainians are correct. What are you taking us for? Idiots? And why would that be so? Because Ukrainians had somewhat different historical trajectory? Actually the ones who had the most different trajectory from Russians, who were exposed to the West the most are responsible for the most horrific butchery of WWII. Illiterate and literate Ukrainian peasants with few leaders perhaps some of your relatives murdering their Polish Catholic neighbors by tens of thousands using axes, saws and pitchforks on the scale and cruelty level not matched even in Balkans during WWII. Few years ago you wrote yourself that it was necessary though perhaps unfortunate. You and your people will have to pray for forgiveness for what you did for another 100 years. So far there was no signs of contrition or atonement among the likes of you not mentioning that quasi human Mr. Hack.
From what I understand AP was born in America, perhaps even from parents that were born there too. Of course it's very easy to cherish delusions of superiority over Russians (or whomever related nationality) when your experience of co-ethnics is limited largely to interactions within a very successful diaspora. Of course, exactly the same thing can be observed with Armenians.
Any concept that Ukrainians (again, Galicia excepted) were anything but culturally identical to Russians until 1991 still feels like an immense cope to me. Can be seen with AP's arguments that modern Russian originates as an artificial state mandated creole.. but if the same linguistic logic is used, that only applies to 'standard Ukrainian' fivefold (not that I dislike Ukrainian as a language, but Ukrainian that's honest with themselves has to admit their language policy has produced a large population semi-illiterate in both Ukrainian and Russian.. when Russians mock Ukrainian speech they usually mean 'Surzhyk'). But I also think its legitimate to view this war as finally amounting to a genuine and decisive process of Ukrainian ethnogenesis, thanks to the amazing competence of the current Kremlins.Replies: @Yevardian, @utu, @AP
As for scale - number of killed per population placed the OUN at about the level of Lenin's Bolsheviks. Not as deadly as Hitler, or Stalin, or Ustashe. Third place in the 20th century when it came to being murderous monsters. None of my relatives were involved in those massacres. Between the wars they were involved in the Christian Social Party and UNDO who were anti-Banderists. A cousin of my grandmother's joined UPA in late 1945, after the killings of Poles so she had nothing to do with that it it was an anti-Soviet act. She killed herself with a grenade while being grabbed by the NKVD, killing them also. Her parents had been professors at Lwow University. This is the second time you repeat this lie. Third time becomes a pattern.
IIRC I said people like Americans had no right to complain because Americans killed more civilians than did Bandera's men, they just had more money and technology and could burn their civilian victims alive using bombs dropped from airplanes rather than killing them using medieval methods. And also Germans didn't do much to Americans to deserve such treatment, while Poland conquered Western Ukraine, placed western Ukrainians in concentration camps in 1918-1920 (about 30,000 deaths out of 100,000 people interred), oppressed Ukrainians throughout the 1930s (particularly Dmowski's National Democrats), and had planned to continue the occupation after the war.
I was absolutely clear in stating that this did not justify the crimes against women and children of the 1940s though.
Did you get that? There was a mutually bloody history which thank God is in the past. Poland no longer claims Ukrainian lands and Ukrainians only have positive feelings towards Poles. I do wish the Banderism was replaced and hopefully it will be eclipsed by the memory of 21st century heroism. But modern Banderism is directed against the Russians. At some point there should be a joint statement in which both sides repudiate the crimes against the other. Before getting into this mess, the Russians need to be stopped first.
I don't have any special insight about BND either, but it wouldn't surprise me if they were much less capable than the US/UK security services. They also have to contend with Germany's warped political culture...in 2020 there was a judicial ruling by Germany's constitutional court whose implications might severely restrict the ability of BND to wire-tap foreigners abroad (because of "human rights"):
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urteil_des_Bundesverfassungsgerichts_zur_Ausland-Ausland-Fernmeldeaufkl%C3%A4rung_des_Bundesnachrichtendienstes
Here's an interview with a former BND chief where he complains this might make intelligence gathering for BND near impossible:
https://www.nzz.ch/international/ex-bnd-chef-schindler-geheimdienst-muss-spielraeume-haben-ld.1583313
He also was quite pro-Russian in that interview (in 2020, "We will be happy if we have Russia on our side one day"...a reference to China?). Who knows what influence such predispositions had (you certainly don't).
btw, I might have stayed away, but then I saw your gloating ("Two down"), and thought "Who does this imbecilic asshole think he is that he can bully away other commenters?". You shouldn't have been so triumphalistic.Replies: @utu
Amazing how great I really am. I have rekindled the fighting spirit in an eunuch. Even Jesus had no miracle like this.
Maybe engage in some self-reflection about your commenting style.Replies: @Yevardian
Also, Chechens are confirmed on the Ukrainian side too, except they seem to be doing actual fighting, as opposed to posing for Kadyrov's instagram. Recently there was a 'leaked' x-ray photo of one of Ramzan's many 'enemies' with a beer-bottle shoved completely up his rectum.Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Dmitry
I don’t know much about the topic or this region at all. But it might be interesting to say that in much of Soviet times, Grozny was a majority Russian city. (It was 70% Russian, before the Second World War).
As later as summer 1994, Grozny had superficially appeared as still a secular city in the amateur videos, with a multinational population. Much of the civilians killed in the Chechen wars were Russians.
I get it. I’m feeling the same pinch with 5 kids, believe me and I’m sorry to hear that it’s tough going for you and yours right now. The coming couple years do preoccupy my mind to some extent. I’m really busy with my business now, but it’s really hard to see the skyrocketing cost of materials combined with increases in interest rates sustaining the bull housing market.
https://decivitate.substack.com/p/how-the-national-debt-will-destroy?s=r
I came across this synopsis of the US national debt/ financial prospects that I thought was good. It reinforces the idea that I’ve had that the Fed is basically out of tools to really deal with our economic situation which doesn’t result in widespread pain. It’s a hard thing to even be able to prepare for. I live in an area with a lot of people on the skinny knife’s edge of financial disaster, and it’s hard to see how any further increases in fuel and living expenses won’t put them over the brink. Especially given how it’s dubious that the government can swoop in and bail everyone out, given that they already shot that wad over covid.
I hope you find ways to keep the ends meeting.
Only AaronB, Triteleia Laxa, utu, A123, songbird and the like will be allowed to speak or write and we will be compelled to listen or read 24/7.Replies: @songbird, @German_reader, @Barbarossa, @utu, @Triteleia Laxa
But iffen, tell whose comment you do enjoy? There must be someone?
Only AaronB, Triteleia Laxa, utu, A123, songbird and the like will be allowed to speak or write and we will be compelled to listen or read 24/7.Replies: @songbird, @German_reader, @Barbarossa, @utu, @Triteleia Laxa
iffen, your destiny is the ninth circle of Hell. Treachery is the ninth Circle of Hell. You have betrayed everything you ever cared for and everything that was given to you with your smug sarcastic indifference. You will be there with Lucifer himself who is imprisoned there.
You mean you didn’t know? Yes, it’s definitely him/her. I remember that poster from over a decade ago (sigh, time flies), when he/she had a blogspot/wordpress and used to go by “Andrea [something-something]”, and there was suspicion (albeit among terminally suspicious WN conspiracy types) that he/she was a tranny. I doubt the tranny part, but I can’t rule out a female.
If I was a little slow on the draw, another part of it is that I haven't read through too many of Priss Factor's comments either. Priss doesn't show up much here, which is my main hang-out on this site. And I didn't realize Priss ever had a blog previously.
Must admit I'm impressed by the volume of output. But, according to my tastes, it is a little too longform. And, maybe, a tad too political. I'd be curious to hear Priss make a purely artistic critique of something, or to suggest what the elements of a good movie are.
I remember there is a George Orwell novel 'Coming up For Air' that deals with a similar theme in depth, Betjeman used to frequently talk about it as well, the growing ugliness of the English landscape, of modern architecture and so on. It must have been something noticeable for people born in the 19th century/turn of the 20th century.
Though you can appreciate it in some ways looking at old photos and walking around, I remember standing on the foundations of a demolished stately home on a hill in County Durham looking at the vista, you could imagine how it would have looked from an upper storey window before industry appeared and modern buildings to change the landscape, impressive.Replies: @Dmitry
I think I saw parts of this as well on YouTube, I will need to watch it all. It’s a pleasure to listen to his interviews. With American television, he is talking about how his grandfather was meeting Napoleon.
Do you subscribe to the YouTube channel “ThamesTV”? It’s a collection of historical reports in England. I saw probably the most interesting reports on these topics on their channel.
There’s also Pathé News, which is a little like Soviet television.
But “ThamesTV” has open, intelligent reports, showing the different points of view, usually criticizing the authorities.
Their report about “Westway” 1970 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nOIRjYUrhZc.).
Also their discussion about “Convent Garden” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5LuuIuXTAlY.) The working man at 11:50 explaining that his house, is better quality than what they are going to replace it with. We know the direction of the city’s history. It would become increasingly successful in many ways/ But that the working class would be mostly removed from its central districts, and central London would become partly a infamous for being storage facility of the wealth of political families (often of oil-producing states).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xL_sMXfzzyAReplies: @AaronB
I admit I thought it might no longer be the case (because Russia is so shiny and modern now, and its armed forced presumably professional), but apparently it still is.Replies: @Wokechoke, @Barbarossa
It seems that even the most professional soldiers will revert to some base instincts when submerged in the fog of wartime. There are plenty of instances of American troops doing unspeakable things in places like Iraq or Afghanistan, things they probably would have never even considered at home. When you add in the aspects of lower pay or slacker discipline it seems to raise the possibility for brutality considerably. The relatively low military budget of Russia, especially compared to it’s ambitions seems to show in these areas.
I think that in many ways wartime can be understood as a completely disconnected psychic territory where all the rules of civilization have been abrogated and this easily unleashes the worst in people. This is why the code of the warrior or chivalry was so important in the past. Even if it wasn’t always followed, it provided an ideal to help mitigate the outflow of human barbarism during wartime.
Russian military culture traditionally has been pretty brutal towards its own soldiers, so it might not be surprising that they're inclined to harsh behaviour against civilians when given the opportunity. I would have thought this had been remedied to some extent in the modern Russian army, but apparently not. Which makes Putin's decision for this war even more foolish imo. The news about Russian war crimes might well play a similar role to the German war crimes in Belgium in 1914 and make any negotiated end to the war much harder (there's already talk of indicting Putin in The Hague after all).Replies: @Wokechoke, @S
The irony is that you were not even gloating, you were simply being witty with your “two down,” which ought to be an object lesson to you that you catch more flies with honey than with vitriol (even if in this case the “honey” was misidentified, given GR’s incurable pessimism).
I also noted a video where one of the Ultra Nationalist Ukies is talking about how the EU is doomed and that an alliance of Ukraine, Turkey, Poland and Great Britain is the new thing and will hasten the day that “Russian Federation is broken into four or five Russias.”
I just don’t know where to begin. It’s even more insane than the Intermarium concept they bat around in the western Slav states. If Russia breaks up further the only mechanism for it would be the CIA and MI6 encouraging Turanic and Mongol populations to slaughter whites in those central Asian regions.
Do the Ukies have imperial ambitions of their own? Armed to the teeth spoiling for a fight. Total loose cannon. Their border dispute with Russia already appears to have ended the petrodollar and globalisation. What’s next? Extermination if white enclaves in Northern Asia?
lol, you seem to be losing it. You don’t like it when people insult you back, do you?
Maybe engage in some self-reflection about your commenting style.
Perhaps it's just the primitive 'caucasoid' in me, but I prefer online discussions to keep atmosphere of a lunchroom foodfight, political discussion would be boring and anemic otherwise.Replies: @German_reader
lol, what happened to your solidarity in tactically not pressing Ukrainians on this topic before the war is over? Seems dubious that it was only me bringing up that old Dmowski essay that breached your tact.
From what I understand AP was born in America, perhaps even from parents that were born there too. Of course it’s very easy to cherish delusions of superiority over Russians (or whomever related nationality) when your experience of co-ethnics is limited largely to interactions within a very successful diaspora. Of course, exactly the same thing can be observed with Armenians.
Any concept that Ukrainians (again, Galicia excepted) were anything but culturally identical to Russians until 1991 still feels like an immense cope to me. Can be seen with AP’s arguments that modern Russian originates as an artificial state mandated creole.. but if the same linguistic logic is used, that only applies to ‘standard Ukrainian’ fivefold (not that I dislike Ukrainian as a language, but Ukrainian that’s honest with themselves has to admit their language policy has produced a large population semi-illiterate in both Ukrainian and Russian.. when Russians mock Ukrainian speech they usually mean ‘Surzhyk’). But I also think its legitimate to view this war as finally amounting to a genuine and decisive process of Ukrainian ethnogenesis, thanks to the amazing competence of the current Kremlins.
But conversely this also translates to actions like at Bucha, which I personally believe could have equally been committed by either side, and I haven't seen any such transparent fakery as with Assad's supposed gas-attack, so I don't bother engaging with it.
His assumption was partially right because GR did not object which tells you something about GR who is irked by manipulativeness of Zelensky and Ukrainian ambassador in Germany but when he has an opportunity to tell it to somebody's face he is silent.
This is not his "cherished delusion". He is not Mr. Hack, he is smarter. When he wrote to GR about brutality of 'Russians' in Germany during and after WWII as if those 'Russians' were not circa 30% Ukrainians to score a chauvinistic point that Ukrainians are better than Russians and that GR should love Ukrainians more than Russians it crossed the line which my solidarity agreement did not extend beyond it
I think I should put more credence to the 'false flag' aspect of atrocities in Ukraine from now on and stop reflexively defending Ukrainians when the the 'false flag' accusations arise. People like AP are capable of killing their own people to score propaganda point because it all begins when you start to treat the truth instrumentally merely as the rhetorical device for forwarding your goals.Replies: @AP, @Mr. Hack, @Mr. Hack, @German_reader
After 2:45 in the interview.
“He thought English hostility to Napoleon was excessive. He visited Napoleon in Elbe.. He was Prime Minister during your (because he is speaking to America) Mexico war.” “When I was young, it was a solid world. English naval supremacy was a law of nature. Bismarck was thought as an uneducated farmer. It was assumed the influence of Goethe and Schiller would return Germany to a more civilized view. We thought Germany was only a land power. It had no navy.. Bismarck compared Germany and England to an elephant and a whale.. My grandmother used to laugh when she said to the Russian ambassador “someday you’ll have a parliament in Russia””.
From what I understand AP was born in America, perhaps even from parents that were born there too. Of course it's very easy to cherish delusions of superiority over Russians (or whomever related nationality) when your experience of co-ethnics is limited largely to interactions within a very successful diaspora. Of course, exactly the same thing can be observed with Armenians.
Any concept that Ukrainians (again, Galicia excepted) were anything but culturally identical to Russians until 1991 still feels like an immense cope to me. Can be seen with AP's arguments that modern Russian originates as an artificial state mandated creole.. but if the same linguistic logic is used, that only applies to 'standard Ukrainian' fivefold (not that I dislike Ukrainian as a language, but Ukrainian that's honest with themselves has to admit their language policy has produced a large population semi-illiterate in both Ukrainian and Russian.. when Russians mock Ukrainian speech they usually mean 'Surzhyk'). But I also think its legitimate to view this war as finally amounting to a genuine and decisive process of Ukrainian ethnogenesis, thanks to the amazing competence of the current Kremlins.Replies: @Yevardian, @utu, @AP
On Ukrainians and Russians being so similar, it reminds of statement Yuri Podolyaka, a pro-Russian Ukrainian analyst honest enough to admit that the war was going disastrously off-plan after its very initial stages. He made comments to the effect that the Ukrainian will and ability to fight never have been so grossly taken for granted, because as fellow Российские and unlike Westerners, Ukrainians possess the same sense of stoicism and grit in warfare.
But conversely this also translates to actions like at Bucha, which I personally believe could have equally been committed by either side, and I haven’t seen any such transparent fakery as with Assad’s supposed gas-attack, so I don’t bother engaging with it.
Maybe engage in some self-reflection about your commenting style.Replies: @Yevardian
Eh, as I think both I and Dmitri have intimated before, you take utu’s pugnaciousness much too seriously. Also, from the perspective of someone who grew up experiencing a generous amount of bullying and physical altercations myself (on both sides, I’m no saint), there’s nothing that encourages escalation of attacks from certain personality types than getting visibly upset or angry.
Perhaps it’s just the primitive ‘caucasoid’ in me, but I prefer online discussions to keep atmosphere of a lunchroom foodfight, political discussion would be boring and anemic otherwise.
But enough of that.
I think that in many ways wartime can be understood as a completely disconnected psychic territory where all the rules of civilization have been abrogated and this easily unleashes the worst in people. This is why the code of the warrior or chivalry was so important in the past. Even if it wasn't always followed, it provided an ideal to help mitigate the outflow of human barbarism during wartime.Replies: @German_reader
Not all armies behave the same though. The British used some pretty extreme methods in the air war during WW2, but by all accounts British ground troops committed comparably few rapes and other assaults against civilians. So these things aren’t inevitable, but to some extent depend on military culture (and other factors as well, like the extent to which one faces irregular combatants, and what sort of reprisals are considered acceptable).
Russian military culture traditionally has been pretty brutal towards its own soldiers, so it might not be surprising that they’re inclined to harsh behaviour against civilians when given the opportunity. I would have thought this had been remedied to some extent in the modern Russian army, but apparently not. Which makes Putin’s decision for this war even more foolish imo. The news about Russian war crimes might well play a similar role to the German war crimes in Belgium in 1914 and make any negotiated end to the war much harder (there’s already talk of indicting Putin in The Hague after all).
Well, I think I may have skimmed the Jung-Freud blog a little once or twice, but I only read through the latest post because I was fascinated by how it reflected Priss Factor’s more idiosyncratic views so closely.
If I was a little slow on the draw, another part of it is that I haven’t read through too many of Priss Factor’s comments either. Priss doesn’t show up much here, which is my main hang-out on this site. And I didn’t realize Priss ever had a blog previously.
Must admit I’m impressed by the volume of output. But, according to my tastes, it is a little too longform. And, maybe, a tad too political. I’d be curious to hear Priss make a purely artistic critique of something, or to suggest what the elements of a good movie are.
Russian military culture traditionally has been pretty brutal towards its own soldiers, so it might not be surprising that they're inclined to harsh behaviour against civilians when given the opportunity. I would have thought this had been remedied to some extent in the modern Russian army, but apparently not. Which makes Putin's decision for this war even more foolish imo. The news about Russian war crimes might well play a similar role to the German war crimes in Belgium in 1914 and make any negotiated end to the war much harder (there's already talk of indicting Putin in The Hague after all).Replies: @Wokechoke, @S
Remember the Mongol and Turkic element here. The downside of multiculti armies is the rape-y enlistees.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xL_sMXfzzyAReplies: @AaronB
His essays are amazing, witty, original, wide ranging and humanistic, and highly entertaining – I spent a very enjoyable month years ago in the heat of Bali going through the entire collection of his essays and his autobiography (I was obsessed with him for a brief period).
(I believe Routledge published all his essays in four or five slim volumes)
He was a “character” of the kind that we can no longer produce – for a mathematician, he had a surprising spiritual depth and humanistic range.
And yet, despite all that, in common with our entire civilization there was something spiritually “missing” in him, in the final analysis. He too must be overcome, to return to health.
Still, if you can get your hands on his essays almost as Good as Orwell!
I was going through a period of interest in skepticism after reading Montaigne, whose skepticism I found powerfully liberating.
Montaignean skepticism made you realize "there are more things on this earth than is dreamed of in your philosophy...."
It was expanding and life enhancing, making the world seem more mysterious and wondrous.
Russelian skepticism in the end made you think there is less, far less, wonder and mystery in the world than you might suppose.
It was, like modern civilization, life-shriveling.
In the end, Russel failed to take the final step of skepticism that may have saved him - skepticism of skepticism.
Still, for a man this severe shortcoming he was remarkably sensitive to art and not without a true sense of wonder. Some of his descriptions of travelling in the Russian steppe are haunting and mystical.
Just, like our civilization, he couldn't take that final leap out of the prison....
@songbird You may be sorry you asked, as there's nothing that dude loves talking about more than movies - and talking, and talking, and talking.... and talking.
He's made lists "best of lists" of movies from the 70s and 80s, which I have found useful at times when casting about for a recommendation. His tastes run sort of similar to mine, so I've come across some gems in his recommendations, but also some stinkers too. If you know how to use the Search function properly you might come up with something. I just tried and I couldn't track down anything really useful in the few goes I gave it. Sprinkled among these has been discussion of what he thinks makes movies good.
I do remember him saying his personal favorite move is "Mystic Pizza" (not equivalent to a claim, he points out, that it's the best movie ever made). I watched it on the strength of that recommendation, and I thought it was merely okay, not something I regretted the time spent on but not something I'd be keen to watch again soon (or again ever), and I'm the sort of person who can easily watch the same movie five times or more even if I think it was merely 'good' rather than super awesome. (Some super-awesomes I estimate I've seen over thirty times.)
Perhaps it's just the primitive 'caucasoid' in me, but I prefer online discussions to keep atmosphere of a lunchroom foodfight, political discussion would be boring and anemic otherwise.Replies: @German_reader
There’s a difference between being “pugnacious” and engaging in extended, destructive “psychoanalysis” of other commenters, which utu seems to prefer so he doesn’t have to address any inconvenient arguments (like the fact that enforcing the NFZ he’s agitating for would entail bombing targets in Russia, or that his babbling about how unimportant trade between Russia and the EU is totally ignores the energy aspect). Given all the nonsense he himself has written over the years (above he even linked to one of his comments from a few years ago…where he bashed reiner tor and me, because we had written something negative about Reinhard Heydrich), his arrogance seems to be rather unfounded to me.
But enough of that.
A house in my neighborhood did the same. However, for a long time the flag was upside-down. I suppose eventually someone told them, because it is the right way up now.
In the end his problem was he was a sceptic, but not of the liberating kind.
I was going through a period of interest in skepticism after reading Montaigne, whose skepticism I found powerfully liberating.
Montaignean skepticism made you realize “there are more things on this earth than is dreamed of in your philosophy….”
It was expanding and life enhancing, making the world seem more mysterious and wondrous.
Russelian skepticism in the end made you think there is less, far less, wonder and mystery in the world than you might suppose.
It was, like modern civilization, life-shriveling.
In the end, Russel failed to take the final step of skepticism that may have saved him – skepticism of skepticism.
Still, for a man this severe shortcoming he was remarkably sensitive to art and not without a true sense of wonder. Some of his descriptions of travelling in the Russian steppe are haunting and mystical.
Just, like our civilization, he couldn’t take that final leap out of the prison….
Thank you for conceding my key point.
PEACE 😇Replies: @Mr. Hack
You must be dreaming? Nothing at all conceded. It’s not that others did it too, but that others are doing it right now. You own no magic wand and are no traffic cop that I bother to consult as to what can and cannot be discussed.
I’m not even trying to plead that because others are doing it, this is justification in itself that Ukraine is not guilty of some real or imagined transgressions based on “collective punishment” (although I would probably wonder why others can get away with it, so why can’t Ukraine?).
So what is exactly the difference between placing severe economic sanctions on Russia by the US and others that will undoubtedly put huge strains on millions of every day Russians, undoubtedly leading to the deaths of many of these individuals due to increased unemployment leading to insufficient diets, increased alcoholism, drug abuse and increased crime etc and Ukraine’s blockade of water to the Crimea?
Please don’t reply that this has already been discussed before and try to tip toe out of this discussion without giving me a straight answer. Your razzle dazzle does not impress me, not in the least.
The way I recall it, Ukraine had a largely third world military, which had been asset-stripped to boot.
Turns out they now have the technological edge over Russia’s 1970s and 1980s throwback army.
I guess there’s such a fine line between those two scenarios that we shouldn’t fault someone for being thrown off by the ambiguities.
What’s more, this is why I don’t make predictions, and I never will! 🙂
Any evidence of this? About 1/3 of the Red Army were Ukrainians but it seems many of the crimes were committed by non-Slavs from Asia (as in Bucha).
They are more European, for better and for worse.
That may have been the Croats. But western Ukrainian actions were very brutal too.
As for scale – number of killed per population placed the OUN at about the level of Lenin’s Bolsheviks. Not as deadly as Hitler, or Stalin, or Ustashe. Third place in the 20th century when it came to being murderous monsters.
None of my relatives were involved in those massacres. Between the wars they were involved in the Christian Social Party and UNDO who were anti-Banderists. A cousin of my grandmother’s joined UPA in late 1945, after the killings of Poles so she had nothing to do with that it it was an anti-Soviet act. She killed herself with a grenade while being grabbed by the NKVD, killing them also. Her parents had been professors at Lwow University.
This is the second time you repeat this lie. Third time becomes a pattern.
IIRC I said people like Americans had no right to complain because Americans killed more civilians than did Bandera’s men, they just had more money and technology and could burn their civilian victims alive using bombs dropped from airplanes rather than killing them using medieval methods. And also Germans didn’t do much to Americans to deserve such treatment, while Poland conquered Western Ukraine, placed western Ukrainians in concentration camps in 1918-1920 (about 30,000 deaths out of 100,000 people interred), oppressed Ukrainians throughout the 1930s (particularly Dmowski’s National Democrats), and had planned to continue the occupation after the war.
I was absolutely clear in stating that this did not justify the crimes against women and children of the 1940s though.
Did you get that?
There was a mutually bloody history which thank God is in the past. Poland no longer claims Ukrainian lands and Ukrainians only have positive feelings towards Poles. I do wish the Banderism was replaced and hopefully it will be eclipsed by the memory of 21st century heroism. But modern Banderism is directed against the Russians.
At some point there should be a joint statement in which both sides repudiate the crimes against the other. Before getting into this mess, the Russians need to be stopped first.
Its not necessary to play up what the Ukrainians did - in pre-modern times, it would not be unusual.
But imagine had the Ukrainians simply surrendered to the Russians - this would have been a massive confirmation of global materialism, and would have strengthened the belief that only material factors matter and discouraged and demoralized anyone wanting to resist power.
It would been a huge win for "Goobohomo" (I hate that name), and for the materialistic assumptions that it depends on, and promoted belief in technocratic control.
China, Russia, and the West, would have made a significant step closer towards converging on a consensus global system of technocratic control and materialism, that would incorporate the worst aspects of Chinese, Russian, and American and European autocracy.
You must look beneath the surface and see the wider picture - that Russia superficially opposes certain manifestations of Woke in the US does not mean it does not represent a a similarly materialistic system of technocratic control.
This does not mean America and the West are the "good guys" - as I hope I made clear, I believe the fight is against all mainstream systems in all the major global players, with perhaps the Woke system in America, and the surveillance state and work culture of China, being the worst examples, with China in my opinion for the time being taking the lead in global dystopia.
To me, the amusing thing is that the West does not understand that supporting Ukraine undermines the materialist system it lives hy at it's root :)
In this way, people often undercut themselves in fundamental ways while trying to promote themselves in superficial ways.
But that's "paradox" :) And the West is singularity lacking in "wisdom" and always sees only the surface.
All that being said, Ukraine represents a small crack in the global system and the materialistic consensus that goes beyond the geopoltical struggle between the great poets.Replies: @Beckow, @silviosilver, @songbird
Well Aaron, as much as we may disagree on the true nature of what ails our world, and what ought to be done instead, we can agree that the prognosis is bleak. Nevertheless, you impress me with your indomitable spirit, which in more challenging moments serves to remind me: life is worth living – even today.*
(*credit for that line goes to Objectivist doyen, Leonard Peikoff, who took it from the title of a 1950s-60s Catholic lecture series, “Life Is Worth Living,” by Bishop Fulton Sheen.)
Also we need a monty python debate between him and the life not worthy of life author. Fortunately the German translation is not stored in my memory.
Lebensunwertes Leben
Thanks to google!Replies: @silviosilver
Yikes, one wonders how many more giants (teetering or not) our budding neo-Nietzsche will topple in his ongoing struggle against the struggle for survival.
You may be sorry you asked, as there’s nothing that dude loves talking about more than movies – and talking, and talking, and talking…. and talking.
He’s made lists “best of lists” of movies from the 70s and 80s, which I have found useful at times when casting about for a recommendation. His tastes run sort of similar to mine, so I’ve come across some gems in his recommendations, but also some stinkers too. If you know how to use the Search function properly you might come up with something. I just tried and I couldn’t track down anything really useful in the few goes I gave it. Sprinkled among these has been discussion of what he thinks makes movies good.
I do remember him saying his personal favorite move is “Mystic Pizza” (not equivalent to a claim, he points out, that it’s the best movie ever made). I watched it on the strength of that recommendation, and I thought it was merely okay, not something I regretted the time spent on but not something I’d be keen to watch again soon (or again ever), and I’m the sort of person who can easily watch the same movie five times or more even if I think it was merely ‘good’ rather than super awesome. (Some super-awesomes I estimate I’ve seen over thirty times.)
Its not necessary to play up what the Ukrainians did - in pre-modern times, it would not be unusual.
But imagine had the Ukrainians simply surrendered to the Russians - this would have been a massive confirmation of global materialism, and would have strengthened the belief that only material factors matter and discouraged and demoralized anyone wanting to resist power.
It would been a huge win for "Goobohomo" (I hate that name), and for the materialistic assumptions that it depends on, and promoted belief in technocratic control.
China, Russia, and the West, would have made a significant step closer towards converging on a consensus global system of technocratic control and materialism, that would incorporate the worst aspects of Chinese, Russian, and American and European autocracy.
You must look beneath the surface and see the wider picture - that Russia superficially opposes certain manifestations of Woke in the US does not mean it does not represent a a similarly materialistic system of technocratic control.
This does not mean America and the West are the "good guys" - as I hope I made clear, I believe the fight is against all mainstream systems in all the major global players, with perhaps the Woke system in America, and the surveillance state and work culture of China, being the worst examples, with China in my opinion for the time being taking the lead in global dystopia.
To me, the amusing thing is that the West does not understand that supporting Ukraine undermines the materialist system it lives hy at it's root :)
In this way, people often undercut themselves in fundamental ways while trying to promote themselves in superficial ways.
But that's "paradox" :) And the West is singularity lacking in "wisdom" and always sees only the surface.
All that being said, Ukraine represents a small crack in the global system and the materialistic consensus that goes beyond the geopoltical struggle between the great poets.Replies: @Beckow, @silviosilver, @songbird
I recently saw a clip of them euthanizing pets in Shanghai, and I must say that it does negatively affect my Euro sensibilities.
In contrast, I recently watched a Chinese movie called “My People, My Homeland.” (2020) Obvious propaganda, but I thought it was very light-hearted and positivist.
Kind of a long movie. The gimmick of it was to tell five different stories, taking place in five different parts of China, to try to promote national feeling. What really struck me the most about it was the impossibility of conceiving Hollywood or anywhere in the West making a movie like it. It was too positive and too nationalist.
I thought it was a good departure from the war propaganda shtick of the CCP.
There will certainly be glimmers here and there.
I am confident that after the current Chinese system is replaced with something much more healthy and free, we will see a burst of creativity from China.
The nature of the current Chinese dystopia is extreme left hemisphere thinking - perhaps the most extreme in the world. This leads to an arid scientism, surveillance and control, self defeating obsessions that are blind to the larger picture like Zero Covid, etc.
So there needs to be a thorough transformation there, and then the innate creativity of the Chinese will burst forth.Replies: @songbird
That veto is not as useful as it once was. The recent decision to explore cutting/withholding EU funds for Hungary can no longer be blocked by a single country, it merely needs a qualified majority.
Which might explain why Hungary is more comfortable staking out a position which would isolate them, since the bar to prevent any such action is now much higher than it used to be.
Article 7, which would remove a country’s voting rights within the EU still needs a unanimous vote, but such a step is seen as so extreme that is not under discussion.
Hungary has pursued a very pro-Russian energy policy. Orban flew to Moscow early in the crisis to ensure gas supplies. He has also partnered with Rosatom to expand their nuclear plant at Paks. Interestingly, he managed to get EU subsidies for the project (this was before the war). Indeed, even Germany has not gone this far.
https://gazetaingush.ru/news/gorzhus-tem-chto-ya-chast-moguchego-silnogo-mnogonacionalnogo-naroda-rossii-putinReplies: @Thulean Friend
Poverty and hyperpatriotism can often intersect. West Virginia is one of the poorest (and whitest) states in the US and has long had an outsized role in sending boys to the US military, despite the US liberal establishment barely hiding its contempt for the state and its people. Southern Whites are also disproportionate senders of men. Both groups are poor yet both are very patriotic. It’s not one or the other.
If the Caucasoids were unpatriotic, there would be protests. Money is meager as you point out, and lots of them are dying, with casualties in the thousands. Mothers would not accept so many dead and wounded for paltry military wages unless there was a genuine upsurge of patriotism.
I dismissed AP’s attacks on you as “too materialist”, since I thought it was unfair, but now I do think this is an area where you seem to be bizarrely focused only on money. It’s an aspect, but not the only one.
Putin is surely aware of this duality, so he focused on the romantic aspects for propaganda purposes, I agree with you there. But I also think it is a window into his worldview. He warned about “caveman nationalism” a few years ago. I agree with him.
That’s interesting. I’ve been seeing reflexive dismissals of Chinese film in the West, often reflective of Sinophobic undercurrents and stereotypes that portrays East Asians as lacking creativity. I find this surprising, given that not only Japanese but also Koreans are producing many high-quality films these days.
So a more refined critic would claim it’s because of the system and not the people, but every system has its needs and perhaps we are simply judging their output with our own colored glasses. I did watch Battle of Lake Changjin a few months ago, as I believe I shared with you, so I won’t repeat my mini-review. But I was more impressed than I expected to be.
China has relatively poor soft power, but it is slowly improving. I haven’t tried the game myself, but I’ve heard positive things about Genshin Impact.
Indeed, Genshin Impact’s success has been so significant that the NYT felt compelled to write a long article trying to spin it as just another stale copy-cat of Japan.
To my mind, this objection is silly. First, countries with very similar cultures tend to produce very cultural products. China’s and Japan’s hostilities notwithstanding, they share far more in common than either do with the West. Second, many successful Japanese companies blatantly rip off Western culture (e.g. Elden Ring) when creating video games. Is the NYT going to blast Japan for lacking creativity and/or cultural appropriation? I want my moral and monetary compensation for these heinous crimes!
I am not a fan of “cultural appropriation” debates, whether between neighbors or across long distances. That kind of discourse is the enemy of experimentation, which is at the root of creativity. And, yes, copying others and modifying it different ways (even if only slightly) is part of that process. That’s why I oppose copyright and support copyleft.
They've also had promotions and partnerships with Google, Apple, Sony, KFC and others.
None of this is surprising because the devs are based in Shanghai. Shanghai is the most pro-Western/liberal city in mainland China.
Of course, although the game is pro-West and pro-Globohomo, it will still be smeared by Jew propagandists because being Chinese is the new Original Sin.Replies: @Yellowface Anon
In some ways, I think it might be an organic result of Civil Rights law, where, I believe, in theory, you can't make a company composed of one ethnic group, even for cultural purposes.
IMO, this is really an unhealthy thing. For one thing, it makes everything more about profit than art. It makes moral content a lot less likely, and it seems to create a lot of antagonisms, which otherwise would not exist or would be smaller.
There is nothing wrong with adopting ideas form overseas. It has lead to many great movies, like Ran, and Yojimbo, and Star Wars, to name a few.
Where I think it often fails today is that Hollywood is a pie-chart system, so we don't get a genuine cultural adaption, when they adopt something from overseas, such as we would see, if it were through a single cultural lens, instead of a multicult one.
Genshin’s lore and worldbuilding is quite excellent, but the storytelling itself is atrocious. Nearly every story in the game boils down to “traditionalism bad, undefined “change” and freedom good”. It certainly has a pro-West and pro-Globohomo tinge to it.
They’ve also had promotions and partnerships with Google, Apple, Sony, KFC and others.
None of this is surprising because the devs are based in Shanghai. Shanghai is the most pro-Western/liberal city in mainland China.
Of course, although the game is pro-West and pro-Globohomo, it will still be smeared by Jew propagandists because being Chinese is the new Original Sin.
Which might explain why Hungary is more comfortable staking out a position which would isolate them, since the bar to prevent any such action is now much higher than it used to be.
Article 7, which would remove a country's voting rights within the EU still needs a unanimous vote, but such a step is seen as so extreme that is not under discussion.
Hungary has pursued a very pro-Russian energy policy. Orban flew to Moscow early in the crisis to ensure gas supplies. He has also partnered with Rosatom to expand their nuclear plant at Paks. Interestingly, he managed to get EU subsidies for the project (this was before the war). Indeed, even Germany has not gone this far.Replies: @Yevardian
Thanks for the context, Orban’s recent gambit certainly makes a lot more rational sense now, I know very little about EU administrative affairs.. only that Germany usually dictates to other members, with the Americans dictating to Germany, with the US maybe occasionally using the Baltics or Poland to pressure for a more anti-Russian policy. Not sure if the voices of any other members carry any weight at all.
Only AaronB, Triteleia Laxa, utu, A123, songbird and the like will be allowed to speak or write and we will be compelled to listen or read 24/7.Replies: @songbird, @German_reader, @Barbarossa, @utu, @Triteleia Laxa
Glad I made the cut, but try to remember that hell is individual.
And now ask: why do you put yourself in your own personal hell? What is it you realise you need from this place?
Not much anymore. There has been a noticeable decline in value in the last few years in the articles and posts, not to mention the comments. Unz has always been a cosmic Sahara with a few oases of uneven quality here and there. Unfortunately, what with climate change those oases seem to be drying up.
From what I understand AP was born in America, perhaps even from parents that were born there too. Of course it's very easy to cherish delusions of superiority over Russians (or whomever related nationality) when your experience of co-ethnics is limited largely to interactions within a very successful diaspora. Of course, exactly the same thing can be observed with Armenians.
Any concept that Ukrainians (again, Galicia excepted) were anything but culturally identical to Russians until 1991 still feels like an immense cope to me. Can be seen with AP's arguments that modern Russian originates as an artificial state mandated creole.. but if the same linguistic logic is used, that only applies to 'standard Ukrainian' fivefold (not that I dislike Ukrainian as a language, but Ukrainian that's honest with themselves has to admit their language policy has produced a large population semi-illiterate in both Ukrainian and Russian.. when Russians mock Ukrainian speech they usually mean 'Surzhyk'). But I also think its legitimate to view this war as finally amounting to a genuine and decisive process of Ukrainian ethnogenesis, thanks to the amazing competence of the current Kremlins.Replies: @Yevardian, @utu, @AP
“what happened to your solidarity” – I lost it because nothing upsets me more than blatant manipulative and primitive dishonesty. And the primitive part is the worst because it implies that he thinks GR to whom he wrote and all of us who would read it are idiots and won’t see through it and won’t object to his chutzpah.
His assumption was partially right because GR did not object which tells you something about GR who is irked by manipulativeness of Zelensky and Ukrainian ambassador in Germany but when he has an opportunity to tell it to somebody’s face he is silent.
This is not his “cherished delusion”. He is not Mr. Hack, he is smarter. When he wrote to GR about brutality of ‘Russians’ in Germany during and after WWII as if those ‘Russians’ were not circa 30% Ukrainians to score a chauvinistic point that Ukrainians are better than Russians and that GR should love Ukrainians more than Russians it crossed the line which my solidarity agreement did not extend beyond it
I think I should put more credence to the ‘false flag’ aspect of atrocities in Ukraine from now on and stop reflexively defending Ukrainians when the the ‘false flag’ accusations arise. People like AP are capable of killing their own people to score propaganda point because it all begins when you start to treat the truth instrumentally merely as the rhetorical device for forwarding your goals.
It seems Moscow’s forces most likely to commit such crimes were non-Slavs both in Germany then and Ukraine now:
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-61071243
Such is the nature of Russia (20% non-Slavic) and its army.
You have a touch of paranoia, utu. You are just a lot smarter than people like Commenter Mike so you don’t fall for the Russian lies (I am not saying the latter just to return the favor).
But on the historical issue concerned, I think you do have a point, it is likely that among the Red army soldiers who committed war crimes in Germany (and Hungary, probably also to some extent in Poland) in 1945 there were many Ukrainians. Due to its huge losses the Red army filled up its ranks in 1944 with people from the recently liberated (or "liberated") territories, including many Ukrainians, many of whom may have collaborated with the Germans before or been involved in the interethnic conflicts of wartime Ukraine, so may have had previous experience of extreme violence.
Regarding the general issue, I don't think Russian soldiers commit war crimes because of their genes or general culture or whatever, imo it's because of how the Russian army has traditionally treated its soldiers (and various situational factors), probably Western Europeans would behave in a similar way in such an environment.
Regarding your spat with AP, it's funny how quickly you change your opinion (suddenly going on about the possibility of Ukrainian "false flag" actions...just like the Putinist rightoids you claim to despise)...really petty :-)Replies: @AP, @utu, @Emil Nikola Richard, @S
I think Putin’s version of the multinational Russian army fighting racism in Ukraine (you could say caveman internationalism) does in some way contribute to rehabilitating nationalism.
The BND told Merkel that the oligarchs would overthrow Putin, it didn't work out, sort like the plan now to collapse the Russian economy, clear the Kremlin won't allow themselves to be hoodwinked with another Minsk, to be fair Russia is in a much stronger position now anyway.
Been a long time since I have heard of even a minor Ukrainian battlefield success...
Almost anyone with any substance in the comment.
The economic collapse the West will experience will certainly discredit the current ruling ideology. We see in Orban and Le Pen the winds of change
The BND told Merkel that the oligarchs would overthrow Putin, it didn’t work out, sort like the plan now to collapse the Russian economy, clear the Kremlin won’t allow themselves to be hoodwinked with another Minsk, to be fair Russia is in a much stronger position now anyway.
Been a long time since I have heard of even a minor Ukrainian battlefield success…
And now ask: why do you put yourself in your own personal hell? What is it you realise you need from this place?Replies: @iffen
And now ask: why do you put yourself in your own personal hell? What is it you realise you need from this place?
Not much anymore. There has been a noticeable decline in value in the last few years in the articles and posts, not to mention the comments. Unz has always been a cosmic Sahara with a few oases of uneven quality here and there. Unfortunately, what with climate change those oases seem to be drying up.
His assumption was partially right because GR did not object which tells you something about GR who is irked by manipulativeness of Zelensky and Ukrainian ambassador in Germany but when he has an opportunity to tell it to somebody's face he is silent.
This is not his "cherished delusion". He is not Mr. Hack, he is smarter. When he wrote to GR about brutality of 'Russians' in Germany during and after WWII as if those 'Russians' were not circa 30% Ukrainians to score a chauvinistic point that Ukrainians are better than Russians and that GR should love Ukrainians more than Russians it crossed the line which my solidarity agreement did not extend beyond it
I think I should put more credence to the 'false flag' aspect of atrocities in Ukraine from now on and stop reflexively defending Ukrainians when the the 'false flag' accusations arise. People like AP are capable of killing their own people to score propaganda point because it all begins when you start to treat the truth instrumentally merely as the rhetorical device for forwarding your goals.Replies: @AP, @Mr. Hack, @Mr. Hack, @German_reader
I appreciate the endorsement of intelligence but I ask again why you think that Ukrainians committed 30% of Soviet crimes during World War II? Merely because they were about 30% of the Soviet forces?
It seems Moscow’s forces most likely to commit such crimes were non-Slavs both in Germany then and Ukraine now:
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-61071243
Such is the nature of Russia (20% non-Slavic) and its army.
You have a touch of paranoia, utu. You are just a lot smarter than people like Commenter Mike so you don’t fall for the Russian lies (I am not saying the latter just to return the favor).
If I could give a double LOL, I would.
From what I understand AP was born in America, perhaps even from parents that were born there too. Of course it's very easy to cherish delusions of superiority over Russians (or whomever related nationality) when your experience of co-ethnics is limited largely to interactions within a very successful diaspora. Of course, exactly the same thing can be observed with Armenians.
Any concept that Ukrainians (again, Galicia excepted) were anything but culturally identical to Russians until 1991 still feels like an immense cope to me. Can be seen with AP's arguments that modern Russian originates as an artificial state mandated creole.. but if the same linguistic logic is used, that only applies to 'standard Ukrainian' fivefold (not that I dislike Ukrainian as a language, but Ukrainian that's honest with themselves has to admit their language policy has produced a large population semi-illiterate in both Ukrainian and Russian.. when Russians mock Ukrainian speech they usually mean 'Surzhyk'). But I also think its legitimate to view this war as finally amounting to a genuine and decisive process of Ukrainian ethnogenesis, thanks to the amazing competence of the current Kremlins.Replies: @Yevardian, @utu, @AP
Nonsense. The people undertaking the Ukrainian linguistic standardisation project (they called it Little Russian) were explicitly seeking for it to be the purest and most natural speech of the Ukrainian people. So they chose the Ukrainian region with the fewest number of foreigners (Great Russians, Poles and Jews) – Poltava guberniya- and used the speech there as the Ukrainian standard. Onto this were added some Galician words, mostly for technical terms.
Contrast this with Russian which was dressed up with Church Slavonic and French words.
As a result, the standardized Ukrainian language is far more natural than the standardized Russian language.
I don’t know if this is the case, but I suspect that this has to do with the fact that Ukrainian was standardized a few decades later than was Russian, when Romanticism became more focused on folk culture and villager idealization rather than ancient history. Nationalism and its corollary language standardizion is largely a product of Romanticism.
"Ethnological Dictionary of the Russian Language"
My roommate used to own an important large Russian language dictionary* that was published in 1910. It was the work of several scholars, and within the preface it stated that up to 40% of Great Russian words had their origin within the Little Russian language. This seems like an incredibly large amount, but as the original Riurik princes and the accompanying priests were from Ukrainian ethnographic territories, this could have been so. I haven’t seen this work and therefore cannot verify the accuracy of the claim. You’re right about the accretion of other foreign words into the Russian language lexicon too.
“Ethnological Dictionary of the Russian Language”
His assumption was partially right because GR did not object which tells you something about GR who is irked by manipulativeness of Zelensky and Ukrainian ambassador in Germany but when he has an opportunity to tell it to somebody's face he is silent.
This is not his "cherished delusion". He is not Mr. Hack, he is smarter. When he wrote to GR about brutality of 'Russians' in Germany during and after WWII as if those 'Russians' were not circa 30% Ukrainians to score a chauvinistic point that Ukrainians are better than Russians and that GR should love Ukrainians more than Russians it crossed the line which my solidarity agreement did not extend beyond it
I think I should put more credence to the 'false flag' aspect of atrocities in Ukraine from now on and stop reflexively defending Ukrainians when the the 'false flag' accusations arise. People like AP are capable of killing their own people to score propaganda point because it all begins when you start to treat the truth instrumentally merely as the rhetorical device for forwarding your goals.Replies: @AP, @Mr. Hack, @Mr. Hack, @German_reader
Ah, I’ve finally made it onto your radar screen, with a high mark too. A day to be cherished and celebrated. I’ve finally arrived – thanks! 🙂
His assumption was partially right because GR did not object which tells you something about GR who is irked by manipulativeness of Zelensky and Ukrainian ambassador in Germany but when he has an opportunity to tell it to somebody's face he is silent.
This is not his "cherished delusion". He is not Mr. Hack, he is smarter. When he wrote to GR about brutality of 'Russians' in Germany during and after WWII as if those 'Russians' were not circa 30% Ukrainians to score a chauvinistic point that Ukrainians are better than Russians and that GR should love Ukrainians more than Russians it crossed the line which my solidarity agreement did not extend beyond it
I think I should put more credence to the 'false flag' aspect of atrocities in Ukraine from now on and stop reflexively defending Ukrainians when the the 'false flag' accusations arise. People like AP are capable of killing their own people to score propaganda point because it all begins when you start to treat the truth instrumentally merely as the rhetorical device for forwarding your goals.Replies: @AP, @Mr. Hack, @Mr. Hack, @German_reader
And for this alone you should be eternally grateful to AP for being able to single handedly wean you away from the narcoleptic stupor that you’ve been stuck in for quite some time now. 🙂
(*credit for that line goes to Objectivist doyen, Leonard Peikoff, who took it from the title of a 1950s-60s Catholic lecture series, "Life Is Worth Living," by Bishop Fulton Sheen.)Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @AaronB, @Barbarossa
He could update that even for prostitutes and surrogate mommies and women who sell their babies to rich foreigners’ adoption agents.
Also we need a monty python debate between him and the life not worthy of life author. Fortunately the German translation is not stored in my memory.
Lebensunwertes Leben
Thanks to google!
His assumption was partially right because GR did not object which tells you something about GR who is irked by manipulativeness of Zelensky and Ukrainian ambassador in Germany but when he has an opportunity to tell it to somebody's face he is silent.
This is not his "cherished delusion". He is not Mr. Hack, he is smarter. When he wrote to GR about brutality of 'Russians' in Germany during and after WWII as if those 'Russians' were not circa 30% Ukrainians to score a chauvinistic point that Ukrainians are better than Russians and that GR should love Ukrainians more than Russians it crossed the line which my solidarity agreement did not extend beyond it
I think I should put more credence to the 'false flag' aspect of atrocities in Ukraine from now on and stop reflexively defending Ukrainians when the the 'false flag' accusations arise. People like AP are capable of killing their own people to score propaganda point because it all begins when you start to treat the truth instrumentally merely as the rhetorical device for forwarding your goals.Replies: @AP, @Mr. Hack, @Mr. Hack, @German_reader
I’ve written far too much here already, probably should do something more productive.
But on the historical issue concerned, I think you do have a point, it is likely that among the Red army soldiers who committed war crimes in Germany (and Hungary, probably also to some extent in Poland) in 1945 there were many Ukrainians. Due to its huge losses the Red army filled up its ranks in 1944 with people from the recently liberated (or “liberated”) territories, including many Ukrainians, many of whom may have collaborated with the Germans before or been involved in the interethnic conflicts of wartime Ukraine, so may have had previous experience of extreme violence.
Regarding the general issue, I don’t think Russian soldiers commit war crimes because of their genes or general culture or whatever, imo it’s because of how the Russian army has traditionally treated its soldiers (and various situational factors), probably Western Europeans would behave in a similar way in such an environment.
Regarding your spat with AP, it’s funny how quickly you change your opinion (suddenly going on about the possibility of Ukrainian “false flag” actions…just like the Putinist rightoids you claim to despise)…really petty 🙂
Utu getting triggered by purported links to Bandera suggests he is an ethnic Silesian from Poland (or a Pole with a German grandparent) rather than someone from Czechoslovakia.Replies: @German_reader
Putinist rightoids have no doubts about false flag cases while I am merely considering to give them a fair hearing.
In terms of propaganda or anti propaganda here is an interesting video. Was it made by Ukrainians who are too dense to realize that people know of Ukrainians' love for farm tools as weapons of choice in carrying out massacres and genocides or is it anti-Ukrainian video that alludes to their love affair with farm tools - a pitchfork is a national symbol?
https://twitter.com/IsraelKebedew/status/1513653583895486472?cxt=HHwWkICz0cb6yYEqAAAA
My personal opinion is that this is a case of Ukrainians shooting themselves in the foot just like AP because of excessive pride and chutzpah.Replies: @German_reader, @A123, @AP, @Peripatetic Commenter
Not to sound patronizing (my own Euro tribe have plenty of their own problems) I would say it's origins can ultimately be found not in any purported incompetence, lack of intelligence, or poor leadership, but in the centuries that the Russian people were under the Mongol Yoke, where Russian life counted for nothing, and that this 'value' was internalized.
If I was Russian I would make it job one to undo that particular damage to the Russian spirit, of which I am sure there are many Russians doing just that.
(*credit for that line goes to Objectivist doyen, Leonard Peikoff, who took it from the title of a 1950s-60s Catholic lecture series, "Life Is Worth Living," by Bishop Fulton Sheen.)Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @AaronB, @Barbarossa
Well, thank you! – but it is more a gift of the spirit than any merit of my own 🙂
All one must do to reconnect with life is move away from materialism and excessive analysis. Life will always be worth living – but too much intellection can disconnect us from it.
Well, nearly all of modernity has to be overcome!
There is lots of good here too, but the majority needs at least to be sifted and reconsidered in light of what we now know.
As for Dmitry retrofitting his narrative, the left hemisphere has to do that and always does do that.
Very well. Maps can simultaneously enhance and diminish our picture of reality, the latter by maps' necessarily omitting some features of the landscape. In some cases, adding more features to the map results in a better map. For instance, a map featuring both street circuits and street names will be more useful than a map with only street circuits.
But it should be clear that there's a limit to how many features you can add to a map, and that at some point there will be diminishing returns in terms of helpfulness with each new feature; and that if this process is taken to its logical conclusion, the map's features will eventually reach a 1:1 correspondence with reality itself, merely resulting in a duplicate of reality, which will not enhance your ability to navigate or understand reality at all.
So although it helps to remind ourselves that the map is not the territory, I don't see how this really helps develop a more holistic view of reality, since as far as our knowledge of reality goes, it's maps all the way down, such that any attempt to 'integrate' these maps runs smack into the aforementioned problem of 1:1 correspondence.Replies: @AaronB
But on the historical issue concerned, I think you do have a point, it is likely that among the Red army soldiers who committed war crimes in Germany (and Hungary, probably also to some extent in Poland) in 1945 there were many Ukrainians. Due to its huge losses the Red army filled up its ranks in 1944 with people from the recently liberated (or "liberated") territories, including many Ukrainians, many of whom may have collaborated with the Germans before or been involved in the interethnic conflicts of wartime Ukraine, so may have had previous experience of extreme violence.
Regarding the general issue, I don't think Russian soldiers commit war crimes because of their genes or general culture or whatever, imo it's because of how the Russian army has traditionally treated its soldiers (and various situational factors), probably Western Europeans would behave in a similar way in such an environment.
Regarding your spat with AP, it's funny how quickly you change your opinion (suddenly going on about the possibility of Ukrainian "false flag" actions...just like the Putinist rightoids you claim to despise)...really petty :-)Replies: @AP, @utu, @Emil Nikola Richard, @S
Have you seen any breakdown of which kinds of troops were most likely to commit atrocities in Germany?
Utu getting triggered by purported links to Bandera suggests he is an ethnic Silesian from Poland (or a Pole with a German grandparent) rather than someone from Czechoslovakia.
I don't think there's any secure data about differences between various ethnic groups. German post-war testimonies apparently often speak about the Asiatic character of perpetrators, but more recent historiography seems to dismiss this (maybe even interpret it as a lingering effect of NS propaganda) and emphasize that a large majority of Red Army soldiers in 1945 were of Slavic background. imo his bizarre flip-flopping in his recent comments indicates that his unhinged calls for a NFZ etc. are much more about a desire for hurting Russia than for helping Ukraine.Replies: @songbird
There are lots of good things in China just below the dystopian crust.
There will certainly be glimmers here and there.
I am confident that after the current Chinese system is replaced with something much more healthy and free, we will see a burst of creativity from China.
The nature of the current Chinese dystopia is extreme left hemisphere thinking – perhaps the most extreme in the world. This leads to an arid scientism, surveillance and control, self defeating obsessions that are blind to the larger picture like Zero Covid, etc.
So there needs to be a thorough transformation there, and then the innate creativity of the Chinese will burst forth.
One thing is certain: nobody who recently printed money because of covid lockdowns anticipated this disruption from Chinese lockdowns, or the fissure with Russia. I think they are very much groping their way through darkness, with their scientism failing them at every turn, including with "green energy", which I think is really the just an extension of the idea that we have mastered the earth and sun.Replies: @Yellowface Anon, @AaronB
Utu getting triggered by purported links to Bandera suggests he is an ethnic Silesian from Poland (or a Pole with a German grandparent) rather than someone from Czechoslovakia.Replies: @German_reader
From what I’ve read it was mostly infantry securing areas after the first advance. Other combat branches like tank forces or artillery don’t seem to have been involved that much, partly because they didn’t have the opportunity, but also because their social and educational profile was different (military specialists of a higher cultural background vs brutalized peasant conscripts in the infantry). Notably, Communist party members don’t seem to have been that prominent among those committing the worst war crimes.
I don’t think there’s any secure data about differences between various ethnic groups. German post-war testimonies apparently often speak about the Asiatic character of perpetrators, but more recent historiography seems to dismiss this (maybe even interpret it as a lingering effect of NS propaganda) and emphasize that a large majority of Red Army soldiers in 1945 were of Slavic background.
imo his bizarre flip-flopping in his recent comments indicates that his unhinged calls for a NFZ etc. are much more about a desire for hurting Russia than for helping Ukraine.
People whose recent ancestors were hunters or herders, probably aren't going to handle it well, on a physiological level. And what's more, they may not have the experience of drinking it, out in the sticks of Siberia.Replies: @songbird
But on the historical issue concerned, I think you do have a point, it is likely that among the Red army soldiers who committed war crimes in Germany (and Hungary, probably also to some extent in Poland) in 1945 there were many Ukrainians. Due to its huge losses the Red army filled up its ranks in 1944 with people from the recently liberated (or "liberated") territories, including many Ukrainians, many of whom may have collaborated with the Germans before or been involved in the interethnic conflicts of wartime Ukraine, so may have had previous experience of extreme violence.
Regarding the general issue, I don't think Russian soldiers commit war crimes because of their genes or general culture or whatever, imo it's because of how the Russian army has traditionally treated its soldiers (and various situational factors), probably Western Europeans would behave in a similar way in such an environment.
Regarding your spat with AP, it's funny how quickly you change your opinion (suddenly going on about the possibility of Ukrainian "false flag" actions...just like the Putinist rightoids you claim to despise)...really petty :-)Replies: @AP, @utu, @Emil Nikola Richard, @S
“probably Western Europeans would behave in a similar way in such an environment” – This is my thinking as well and that’s why I found AP’s attempt of manipulation so annoying and his assumption that we must be idiots only amplified it. I have no tolerance for blatant manipulative lies.
Putinist rightoids have no doubts about false flag cases while I am merely considering to give them a fair hearing.
In terms of propaganda or anti propaganda here is an interesting video. Was it made by Ukrainians who are too dense to realize that people know of Ukrainians’ love for farm tools as weapons of choice in carrying out massacres and genocides or is it anti-Ukrainian video that alludes to their love affair with farm tools – a pitchfork is a national symbol?
https://twitter.com/IsraelKebedew/status/1513653583895486472?cxt=HHwWkICz0cb6yYEqAAAA
My personal opinion is that this is a case of Ukrainians shooting themselves in the foot just like AP because of excessive pride and chutzpah.
The video is interesting though because it makes really clear that Ukrainian nationalism is a much more visceral and traditional affair than many pro-Ukrainian Westerners assume (who believe Putin is bad because he oppresses the gays or bankrolls "Nazis" like AfD and Le Pen). As I wrote above, these contradictions could get interesting, if Ukraine (or part of it) moves towards some form of EU association after the war.
____There is no easy answer to the issue. It impacts every military, not just those in this direct fight. Professionalism will help, but is not a guarantee.PEACE 😇
Putinist rightoids have no doubts about false flag cases while I am merely considering to give them a fair hearing.
In terms of propaganda or anti propaganda here is an interesting video. Was it made by Ukrainians who are too dense to realize that people know of Ukrainians' love for farm tools as weapons of choice in carrying out massacres and genocides or is it anti-Ukrainian video that alludes to their love affair with farm tools - a pitchfork is a national symbol?
https://twitter.com/IsraelKebedew/status/1513653583895486472?cxt=HHwWkICz0cb6yYEqAAAA
My personal opinion is that this is a case of Ukrainians shooting themselves in the foot just like AP because of excessive pride and chutzpah.Replies: @German_reader, @A123, @AP, @Peripatetic Commenter
Most people don’t know about that. You vastly overestimate the extent of knowledge about Eastern Europe in Western countries.
The video is interesting though because it makes really clear that Ukrainian nationalism is a much more visceral and traditional affair than many pro-Ukrainian Westerners assume (who believe Putin is bad because he oppresses the gays or bankrolls “Nazis” like AfD and Le Pen). As I wrote above, these contradictions could get interesting, if Ukraine (or part of it) moves towards some form of EU association after the war.
But on the historical issue concerned, I think you do have a point, it is likely that among the Red army soldiers who committed war crimes in Germany (and Hungary, probably also to some extent in Poland) in 1945 there were many Ukrainians. Due to its huge losses the Red army filled up its ranks in 1944 with people from the recently liberated (or "liberated") territories, including many Ukrainians, many of whom may have collaborated with the Germans before or been involved in the interethnic conflicts of wartime Ukraine, so may have had previous experience of extreme violence.
Regarding the general issue, I don't think Russian soldiers commit war crimes because of their genes or general culture or whatever, imo it's because of how the Russian army has traditionally treated its soldiers (and various situational factors), probably Western Europeans would behave in a similar way in such an environment.
Regarding your spat with AP, it's funny how quickly you change your opinion (suddenly going on about the possibility of Ukrainian "false flag" actions...just like the Putinist rightoids you claim to despise)...really petty :-)Replies: @AP, @utu, @Emil Nikola Richard, @S
In Bloodlands Timothy Snyder more than once has anecdotes that vigilante band militia atrocities were sickening to the German and Russian pros. That book is so repulsive that after I read it I immediately threw it in the dumpster because I didn’t want the thing in my home.
I’m not saying Ukrainians are some kind of saints or spiritual paragons.
I am sure they are heavily corrupted by modernity as we all are, and I’m sure they too suffer from a heavy materialistic streak. No doubt about it. They also appear to have unsavoury elements to their traditional nationalism, although again they’re hardly unique in this.
But the fact they resisted at all shows some level of non-materalism, as people who just wanted comfort and prosperity don’t fight, sacrifice themselves, and endure destruction and hardship, because if comfort is your primary value submitting to an aggressor is always the superior choice, particularly one that just wants to dominate and assimilate you and enslave or destroy you.
And in today’s world, we must take what we can get, even if it isn’t much.
Even to an outsider like myself not particularly involved in the conflict, Putin’s Russia seems to have something cold and power worshipping about it, something that is about size and materialism and domination. Surely, Karlin’s attitude cannot be completely unrelated to the spiritual atmosphere of Putin’s Russia, even if he is projecting somewhat.
It’s not hard to imagine the Ukrainians see this more vividly from their perch, and are terrified of being assimilated into it.
It’s like Taiwan is hardly some some of paragon of spirituality, and is in fact deeply sick with modernity, but when you look at the cold soulless face of Xi’s China, you can understand why the Taiwanese are terrified of being absorbed into it.
That doesn’t mean the Ukrainians and Taiwanese are not deeply flawed and corrupted by modernity, and are some kind of spiritual paragons. Not at all.
And these trends of surveillance, control, power worship, domination, respect for size are gaining massive ground in the West, and any success for Putin or Xi means a loss for the possibility of spiritual rejuvenation in the West.
That’s the larger picture.
All this being said, I don’t want to demonize ordinary Russians, or ordinary Chinese, who are not responsible for this. All the “cancelling” of Russians that is now taking place across the West is hideous, misguided, and gratuitously cruel.
It’s also totalitarian, which makes it all the more urgent to not support the totalitarian impulse anywhere in the world.
But definitely the situation is complex, and even if on balance one supports a particular side it’s really important to keep in mind all the contradictions and facts that complicate the picture and make things more gray than black and white.
I don't think there's any secure data about differences between various ethnic groups. German post-war testimonies apparently often speak about the Asiatic character of perpetrators, but more recent historiography seems to dismiss this (maybe even interpret it as a lingering effect of NS propaganda) and emphasize that a large majority of Red Army soldiers in 1945 were of Slavic background. imo his bizarre flip-flopping in his recent comments indicates that his unhinged calls for a NFZ etc. are much more about a desire for hurting Russia than for helping Ukraine.Replies: @songbird
Some of this might come down to alcohol tolerance.
People whose recent ancestors were hunters or herders, probably aren’t going to handle it well, on a physiological level. And what’s more, they may not have the experience of drinking it, out in the sticks of Siberia.
Putinist rightoids have no doubts about false flag cases while I am merely considering to give them a fair hearing.
In terms of propaganda or anti propaganda here is an interesting video. Was it made by Ukrainians who are too dense to realize that people know of Ukrainians' love for farm tools as weapons of choice in carrying out massacres and genocides or is it anti-Ukrainian video that alludes to their love affair with farm tools - a pitchfork is a national symbol?
https://twitter.com/IsraelKebedew/status/1513653583895486472?cxt=HHwWkICz0cb6yYEqAAAA
My personal opinion is that this is a case of Ukrainians shooting themselves in the foot just like AP because of excessive pride and chutzpah.Replies: @German_reader, @A123, @AP, @Peripatetic Commenter
Troops having smart phones on the battlefield appears to be a severe problem for command & control. Individuals on all sides get to see the propaganda (and potential false flags) that make the other side look monstrous.
After seeing the videos, neither Russian nor Ukrainian troops have an incentive to surrender. If you are 100% certain to be killed, why not fight to the death? If the other side is mutilating POW’s, why not respond in kind on your prisoners?
The Generals on all sides would stop it if they could. It makes the strategic problems of both war and the subsequent peace harder. However, it is very difficult to pull troops off the line to discipline them.
____
There is no easy answer to the issue. It impacts every military, not just those in this direct fight. Professionalism will help, but is not a guarantee.
PEACE 😇
Putinist rightoids have no doubts about false flag cases while I am merely considering to give them a fair hearing.
In terms of propaganda or anti propaganda here is an interesting video. Was it made by Ukrainians who are too dense to realize that people know of Ukrainians' love for farm tools as weapons of choice in carrying out massacres and genocides or is it anti-Ukrainian video that alludes to their love affair with farm tools - a pitchfork is a national symbol?
https://twitter.com/IsraelKebedew/status/1513653583895486472?cxt=HHwWkICz0cb6yYEqAAAA
My personal opinion is that this is a case of Ukrainians shooting themselves in the foot just like AP because of excessive pride and chutzpah.Replies: @German_reader, @A123, @AP, @Peripatetic Commenter
What manipulation? I noted that Russian troops’ behavior in Ukraine today (which Russia denies) is similar to Russian behavior in Germany (which Russians also deny).
I have seen no evidence that Ukrainians engaged in the behavior in Germany to the extent that Russians or especially non-Slavs did. Have you? Or are you making this claim because you were triggered by the behavior of Volhynians and to a lesser extent Galicians, neither of whom were very anti-German or likely to be in the Soviet Army. For that matter I suspect that central Ukrainians may have been less anti-German than were Russians. I’ve heard anecdotes from central Ukrainians about German soldiers treating people decently that Russians would not have had access to (and this would have been more likely to dehumanize the Germans).
I'm also pretty sure I've read that the Red Army pressed large numbers of Ukrainians from the recently re-conquered territories into service in 1944 (in a German book about the Red army in Germany in 1945, unfortunately don't have access to that book now, so can't check).
Anyway, the ethnic background of Red army soldiers who committed war crimes in 1945 shouldn't matter that much...what matters is that the Russian army still seems to be run along lines which seem to be conducive to their soldiers going berserk against civilians when given the opportunity.Replies: @AP, @Beckow
I just don’t know where to begin. It’s even more insane than the Intermarium concept they bat around in the western Slav states. If Russia breaks up further the only mechanism for it would be the CIA and MI6 encouraging Turanic and Mongol populations to slaughter whites in those central Asian regions.
Do the Ukies have imperial ambitions of their own? Armed to the teeth spoiling for a fight. Total loose cannon. Their border dispute with Russia already appears to have ended the petrodollar and globalisation. What’s next? Extermination if white enclaves in Northern Asia?Replies: @Beckow
In Czechia and Slovakia Intermarium is not even a concept – there is a strong instinctive resistance never to look east. There is a small ambitious “cultural” big-city group that wakes up every few decades and decides that some really heavy sucking up to the Western masters could have personal benefits. They talk and talk, but none would go east for anything. Too messy there.
This happens every few decades with such regularity that it can be predicted: somebody in the West shouts “boom” and offers money or positions and a small part of the population rises up and talks big about how “we are the West, let’s join in breaking up those Asiatic savages”. They re-write history (again), make extreme statements, march on big-city squares, often outdo even the Western hatreds. Then they send expired food or weapons – we are very good at making weapons, but not in actually using them.
When it is over they pretend that it was all nothing, they hide or outright lie. This happened after WWI and WWII. Often the same people who aggressively wanted to attack Russia will be the biggest born-again Slav brothers. What can you do? These are idiots, it is more an extreme form of brown-nosing than strong beliefs. In Slovakia the current fearless “Drang nach Osten” leader is literally the grandson of the Slovak WWII air force chief who fought with Nazis in Russia (they had 4 small planes!!!). Then he was the most servile servant of the commies after WWII. As I said, it never changes.
People whose recent ancestors were hunters or herders, probably aren't going to handle it well, on a physiological level. And what's more, they may not have the experience of drinking it, out in the sticks of Siberia.Replies: @songbird
Possibly, another reason could be language. How Russian-fluent are the people from these republics today?
The war crimes were probably only partly motivated by hatred of Germans, much of it may rather have been oppressed peasants who were brutalized by the military system and who suffered high loss rates (partly because their commanders didn’t care that much about them) lashing out and behaving like sadistic masters for once in their life when given the chance.
I’m also pretty sure I’ve read that the Red Army pressed large numbers of Ukrainians from the recently re-conquered territories into service in 1944 (in a German book about the Red army in Germany in 1945, unfortunately don’t have access to that book now, so can’t check).
Anyway, the ethnic background of Red army soldiers who committed war crimes in 1945 shouldn’t matter that much…what matters is that the Russian army still seems to be run along lines which seem to be conducive to their soldiers going berserk against civilians when given the opportunity.
I wonder if shorter-format stories might favor the Chinese, on a political level, when dealing with the CCP. Maybe, make arbitrary censorship less likely, and help them reduce the number of characters, thus making it more manageable, or relatable to Westerners.
What they make me appreciate is that we are living under an unhealthy, zero-sum system. What I would call the “pie-chart system”, where there is one cultural center, Hollywood, in the West, split between several different peoples.
In some ways, I think it might be an organic result of Civil Rights law, where, I believe, in theory, you can’t make a company composed of one ethnic group, even for cultural purposes.
IMO, this is really an unhealthy thing. For one thing, it makes everything more about profit than art. It makes moral content a lot less likely, and it seems to create a lot of antagonisms, which otherwise would not exist or would be smaller.
There is nothing wrong with adopting ideas form overseas. It has lead to many great movies, like Ran, and Yojimbo, and Star Wars, to name a few.
Where I think it often fails today is that Hollywood is a pie-chart system, so we don’t get a genuine cultural adaption, when they adopt something from overseas, such as we would see, if it were through a single cultural lens, instead of a multicult one.
The thought occurred to me that the house I was referring to might have it upside down, so the last couple of walks around the neighborhood I’ve wanted to check whether they had it the right way up, but it seems they’ve taken it down.
I can understand. It was fun while it lasted, but you can’t have a massive flag like that blocking daylight from streaming into the parlor forever, you know. And anyway, it’s on to next big cause to signal over. No rest for the virtuous! (Although I think in this case they were premature. This war’s signaling has got legs. We haven’t even reached the stage of “rape camp” accusations yet.)
@barbarossa
re double LOL, yeah the upside down flag is bit like the civil rights “I Have A Deram!” sign.
Then again, off the top of your head, would you know the right way up, or the correct color order of the various European tricolor flags? I thought about it, and although I could recognize each of them, I really couldn’t be sure of the order at all.
There will certainly be glimmers here and there.
I am confident that after the current Chinese system is replaced with something much more healthy and free, we will see a burst of creativity from China.
The nature of the current Chinese dystopia is extreme left hemisphere thinking - perhaps the most extreme in the world. This leads to an arid scientism, surveillance and control, self defeating obsessions that are blind to the larger picture like Zero Covid, etc.
So there needs to be a thorough transformation there, and then the innate creativity of the Chinese will burst forth.Replies: @songbird
I don’t think that the Chinese will invade Taiwan anytime soon. They are too dependent on energy from distant places. But, if I did think that they going to invade, I’d wonder if the lockdown in Shanghai was some sort of dry run. To crackdown on dissent, or, maybe, help get experience for occupying Taipei.
One thing is certain: nobody who recently printed money because of covid lockdowns anticipated this disruption from Chinese lockdowns, or the fissure with Russia. I think they are very much groping their way through darkness, with their scientism failing them at every turn, including with “green energy”, which I think is really the just an extension of the idea that we have mastered the earth and sun.
But it's hard to predict because the whole project operates on the level of myth, and China's leaders are prone to delusion and arrogance - the vice of the technocratic mind.
I understand the impulse to find some "rational" reason for the Shanghai lockdowns, because they seem so crazy.
But this kind of self-defeating behavior which is blind to the human consequences of grand engineering "solutions" are unfortunately perfectly typical of cultures that become left hemisphere trapped.
Interestingly, simply on the level of "technique" it's self defeating because lots of people are dying from preventable causes, denied care over Covid restrictions.
But once this kind of mentality zeroes in on a "goal", it pursues it relentlessly without the ability to notice the self-defeating consequences on a "wider" level of reality.
Obviously, our own culture is trapped in a similar dynamic.
Take the censorship Thulean Friend alludes to above -
Simply on the level of "technique", it's self-defeating, because it doesn't actually keep people from finding out suppressed content.
So all it accomplishes is massively undermine confidence in mainstream media - a goal diametrically opposite to the attempt to "shape the information landscape".
But notice - the "undermining" takes place on a higher, wider level of reality than the original goal. So to see that, you'd have to be able to "zoom out".
But the technocratic mentality operates primarily on the level of fine detail, so unless it's balanced by another mode of thinking it literally cannot "zoom out".
And the more ones education is almost entirely in STEM, the more the ability to zoom out simply atrophies. Absolutely correct.
Notice, no one talks about limiting our energy consumption anymore, as part of rebalancing with nature and returning to a wider frame from which to view reality.
No, it's merely more technocratic solutions while leaving our fundamental behavior untouched, even more delusional this time.
The so called environmental movement has been hijacked by the left hemisphere types as much as anyone.Replies: @songbird, @Barbarossa
I'm also pretty sure I've read that the Red Army pressed large numbers of Ukrainians from the recently re-conquered territories into service in 1944 (in a German book about the Red army in Germany in 1945, unfortunately don't have access to that book now, so can't check).
Anyway, the ethnic background of Red army soldiers who committed war crimes in 1945 shouldn't matter that much...what matters is that the Russian army still seems to be run along lines which seem to be conducive to their soldiers going berserk against civilians when given the opportunity.Replies: @AP, @Beckow
I just did some googling. A lot of complaints involved Mongolians troops – who were stationed in Berlin (this would be Tuvans and Buryats from Russia, the same peoples running amok in Ukraine now). Alcohol also played a role. Russians do drink more than do Ukrainians, and people like Buryats are notorious for not holding their liquor. So although it is certain that some Ukrainians participated in outages in Germany I highly doubt it was 1/3 of perpetrators or close to that. Utu does not have a pattern of lying (yet) so I will assume his false claim was a mistake, probably because as someone from Poland he gets triggered by Bandera.
Utu falsely accused me of lying which is a serious accusation.
I also didn't mean to endorse utu's claim that you were lying. It should be obvious that I don't appreciate utu's habits of interacting with other commenters.
Still, the most exploited nationality are Yakuts, as they should be one of the wealthiest place, considering how many resources exist on their land. But almost all surplus income from those resources is going to enrich Moscow, or further (to London and Marbella), while cities freeze, their infrastructure is not highly rated, and you get the pollution without the benefits. Well, emigration to China, is becoming a popular option there.Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Yahya
Also we need a monty python debate between him and the life not worthy of life author. Fortunately the German translation is not stored in my memory.
Lebensunwertes Leben
Thanks to google!Replies: @silviosilver
You’d never know it now, but when I made my first foray into the race debate, some fifteen years ago, I did so arguing, quite vehemently, against ‘racism.’ (Occasional poster here “Matra” might recall those days at “Majority Rights.”) I’d accepted the basic facts of racial realism, but I despised the attitudes of the nazi-ish WNs I encountered.
At one point I accused them of treating some human life as (inherently) unworthy of life. As far as I was aware, I hadn’t heard that phrase before (although it’s possible I had, and my unconscious had logged it, to recall it when the need arose), so I was “heartened” to learn it had been used by the actual Nazis, because it suggested my insight into their character was accurate.
Nowadays, judging by my rhetoric, you’d be hard-pressed to tell the difference between me and them. When I casually toss around terms like “negrofuxxation,” it obviously suggests the most despicable form of racist asshole. (To be sure, I am a ‘racist’ – though I must hasten to add, that is not the only reason I am admired. 🙂 )
The truth is though, if this were a more mainstream forum – rather than a heavily self-selected audience – I would never speak this way, and not simply from fear of being banned. Simple-minded racial hatred is the last thing I want to encourage. Racial self-preference and racial ‘ingathering’ (separation, segregation, if you like – loaded terms, but not altogether inaccurate) is the sweet spot, not hating and thundering against racial others. I only do it here to let off some steam, and poke moralistic, holier-than-thou ‘anti-racist’ cocksuckers in the eye. Technically counterproductive, but it’s far from the most important thing preventing a nobody like me from wielding greater influence.
-B- White Iranian Muslim?As a Christian, I want to live. Thus, " A" is obviously the correct answer. No matter how fair skinned, even Aryan, a Persian might appear -- the core value of Islam is killing Christians. Choosing "B" is suicidal.
___ HBD differences between groups exists. When dealing with large-scale issues like mass migration, that impact should be considered. However, on an individual level, having a stable 2-parent family & a traditional values church can help almost any kid become a good person.PEACE 😇Replies: @Wokechoke, @silviosilver, @Emil Nikola Richard, @songbird
I don’t think anybody can know anything with certainty about numbers, percentages etc. (including utu with his 1/3). The nature of the subject doesn’t lend itself to such accuracy.
I also didn’t mean to endorse utu’s claim that you were lying. It should be obvious that I don’t appreciate utu’s habits of interacting with other commenters.
I'm also pretty sure I've read that the Red Army pressed large numbers of Ukrainians from the recently re-conquered territories into service in 1944 (in a German book about the Red army in Germany in 1945, unfortunately don't have access to that book now, so can't check).
Anyway, the ethnic background of Red army soldiers who committed war crimes in 1945 shouldn't matter that much...what matters is that the Russian army still seems to be run along lines which seem to be conducive to their soldiers going berserk against civilians when given the opportunity.Replies: @AP, @Beckow
And what was motivating the German war crimes? Germans committed one or two orders of magnitude more war crimes in the east than the victorious Soviets committed in Germany at the end of the war. What was the motivation? Makes one wonder about the brutality in Germany and its allies.
That would suggest conscious choices. The number of well-documented Western armies going berserk from Iraq to Vietnam, from bombing civilians in Serbia to training murderous militias in Latin America is almost endless. Was that also conscious and is that the way Western armies are run? Or, miraculously, were those “one-offs”, “undisciplined soldiers”, or whatever?
This really consistent self-serving description of the “other” as always inclined to evil and self as “mistakes were made” is amusing. It says a lot about the essentially under-developed Western thinking: disconnect from reality, cherry-pick at will, omit context, and generalize. This will not get us far.
I don’t think I’ve denied that Wehrmacht committed lots of war crimes (like causing the mass death of pows, mass killings of civilians in anti-partisan warfare, systematic destruction of property etc.), many of which were arguably worse than what the Red army did. I also just recently mentioned American war crimes in Korea and Vietnam. However I don’t think you’re interested in a genuine discussion, it’s just the usual lament about Western hypocrisy (which exists, never claimed otherwise) so you don’t have to face up to the fact that Russian troops are doing some pretty ugly things in Ukraine.
My roommate lived for a good while in both Poland and in Germany during and after the war. He was from Central Ukraine (Bila Tserkva) and his parents were from Izium previously. He spent a good amount of time as a kid in the Kharkiv oblast, in a small town/radhosp called Keichivka. He told me that while he was in Cracow (April 1944) he was approached by some Germans that wanted to recruit him to join the Nazi youth group. He didn’t take up their offer, although always felt comfortable in their company. After the war, in Germany, he really took a liking to Germany (hard to believe because it was quite bombed out), and very much lamented his parents decision to immigrate to the US. He feared the Americans, because he lived through the bombing of Berlin, and also has vivid memories of having to run full throttle one time when an American plane was shooting at him from above nearly hitting him…….such are the vagaries of war.
I am sure they are heavily corrupted by modernity as we all are, and I'm sure they too suffer from a heavy materialistic streak. No doubt about it. They also appear to have unsavoury elements to their traditional nationalism, although again they're hardly unique in this.
But the fact they resisted at all shows some level of non-materalism, as people who just wanted comfort and prosperity don't fight, sacrifice themselves, and endure destruction and hardship, because if comfort is your primary value submitting to an aggressor is always the superior choice, particularly one that just wants to dominate and assimilate you and enslave or destroy you.
And in today's world, we must take what we can get, even if it isn't much.
Even to an outsider like myself not particularly involved in the conflict, Putin's Russia seems to have something cold and power worshipping about it, something that is about size and materialism and domination. Surely, Karlin's attitude cannot be completely unrelated to the spiritual atmosphere of Putin's Russia, even if he is projecting somewhat.
It's not hard to imagine the Ukrainians see this more vividly from their perch, and are terrified of being assimilated into it.
It's like Taiwan is hardly some some of paragon of spirituality, and is in fact deeply sick with modernity, but when you look at the cold soulless face of Xi's China, you can understand why the Taiwanese are terrified of being absorbed into it.
That doesn't mean the Ukrainians and Taiwanese are not deeply flawed and corrupted by modernity, and are some kind of spiritual paragons. Not at all.
And these trends of surveillance, control, power worship, domination, respect for size are gaining massive ground in the West, and any success for Putin or Xi means a loss for the possibility of spiritual rejuvenation in the West.
That's the larger picture.
All this being said, I don't want to demonize ordinary Russians, or ordinary Chinese, who are not responsible for this. All the "cancelling" of Russians that is now taking place across the West is hideous, misguided, and gratuitously cruel.
It's also totalitarian, which makes it all the more urgent to not support the totalitarian impulse anywhere in the world.
But definitely the situation is complex, and even if on balance one supports a particular side it's really important to keep in mind all the contradictions and facts that complicate the picture and make things more gray than black and white.Replies: @Beckow
There is a minority of Ukies who are resisting. I suspect even in very post-modern hedonistic Western countries many would sacrifice and resist. That is also true for Russia or China: any attack on them would trigger huge resistance. So what you are describing (correctly) in Ukraine is not unique. It may be more visible and more publicized.
The power orientation and coldness that Russia and China have at their centers are in my view a consequence of their geography: large, resources-rich areas that have been attacked throughout history. That creates both a strong urge to have a powerful defense and also a certain amount of paranoia.
The best way to deal with it is to downplay these realities over time – the West chose to do exactly the opposite. That is both harmful to mankind as a whole, and also very unlikely to work. The best way to get what one wants from China or Russia is by putting them at ease – they both tend to be quite generous and unoffensive when among “friends”. Neither one has a history of global plunder or inventing “virtues” to justify it. But it is too late for that.
I want to go back to your earlier point about maps and territories. Obviously you agree that maps aid our ability to navigate and understand reality. And the obvious retort to someone arguing that, to complete our picture of reality, more mapping will be required is to triumphantly wag your forefinger and exclaim “the map is not the territory!”
Very well. Maps can simultaneously enhance and diminish our picture of reality, the latter by maps’ necessarily omitting some features of the landscape. In some cases, adding more features to the map results in a better map. For instance, a map featuring both street circuits and street names will be more useful than a map with only street circuits.
But it should be clear that there’s a limit to how many features you can add to a map, and that at some point there will be diminishing returns in terms of helpfulness with each new feature; and that if this process is taken to its logical conclusion, the map’s features will eventually reach a 1:1 correspondence with reality itself, merely resulting in a duplicate of reality, which will not enhance your ability to navigate or understand reality at all.
So although it helps to remind ourselves that the map is not the territory, I don’t see how this really helps develop a more holistic view of reality, since as far as our knowledge of reality goes, it’s maps all the way down, such that any attempt to ‘integrate’ these maps runs smack into the aforementioned problem of 1:1 correspondence.
Maps, "abstract representations" - even the most complete - are just one way of engaging with reality, and a very limited one.
There is imagination, intuition, and direct sense contact and embodied engagement with reality.
That is why the mystics say that to see God, you have to dispense with maps altogether. They say you have to cease trying to "know" God through intellectual categories.
There is a great book from a 12th century English mystic called "The Cloud of Unknowing", in which he says God can never be reached through knowledge, but only through love.
Our most important experiences - love, art, poetry, beauty - can not be "known", but only hinted at, through abstract representations.
In terms of gaining more "knowledge", imagination and intuition comes into contact with some aspect of reality, and we then construct abstract representations in order to "hint" at what can never be fully captured in abstract intellectual categories.
But if you're trapped entirely in "mapland", as we moderns increasingly are, imagination and intuition cannot play it's role even in furthering "knowledge".
We have adopted Descartes belief that we must only have clear, distinct, and certain ideas - yet imagination and intuition, which is our primary direct contact with reality, produces indistinct and unclear ideas.
Keats said we need "negative capability" - the ability to sit with uncertainty and not rush to form conclusions and certainties.
We've lost that today, and can no longer listen to the imagination - so we are no longer creative.
Einstein, who relief on imagination to come up with his theories, said his great regret was that he didn't read the mystics when he was younger.Replies: @AaronB, @AaronB, @Mikel
Ukraine also produces laser guided artillery shells (https://ukroboronprom.com.ua/en/product/kvitnik). They modify the laser aimer on the consumer drones, and this use of the consumer drones then guides some artillery attacks. It is 21st century, but many are improvised 21st century consumer products. Not like Azerbaijan, had the most expensive hi-tech drones, and which have years of integrating them. To write pedantically, Kalibr cruise missiles are really toys of 1980s Sverdlovsk. They were designed under Lev Lyulyev (he was born in 1908 in Kiev), as a possible nuclear delivery system. Soviet Union designed and tested in 1983. In the 1990s, there was not finance available to complete the project, integrate them or attain their entry to service, so they were not available in the Chechen Wars. They use satellite navigation and are used against fixed targets. So (unlike loitering drones) you need to know already what the target is, before you use them, and of course they are very expensive (they were originally developed for tactical nuclear warheads).Replies: @Jake1
Hey Dimitry,
It’s really hard for me to understand why you are always going on about the Azeri 2020 result as if it’s some great “victory” showcasing what a fine and truly modern army can do.
Reviewing the basic facts of this war. Azeri losses according to their own MoD are 2900 Azeri’s + 400 Syrian KIA’s. Armenia says 7600 KIA’s combined for them but let’s go with 3300. With these losses they basically took ~3000 square Km’s of crappy territory with rocky/poor soil and no known resources that wasnt even recognized or fully defended by Armenia. Azerbaijan started to invasion with about 17k troops including mercs and I’m sure had some extra troops for rotation.
Russia meanwhile invaded Ukraine proper (including a failed attempt to take the capital) with about 220-240k troops including Donbass separatists and probably 80-100k contract rotational forces available. It’s overall population and force availability was almost exactly 15x that of Azerbaijan. On a population and combat force adjusted basis Azeri dead were roughly 50k to get the result they got. Credible Russian KIA estimates are currently 5k-20k so let’s say 12.5k as a midpoint. They are currently sitting at 1/4th Azeri losses on a pop/combat force adjusted basis. At that cost they are sitting on 83,000 square km’s of newly taken territory in East Ukraine that has some of the richest farmland in the world and significant to very significant reserves of coal, gas, lithium, magnesium, iron ore, uranium, etc.
Interestingly Russia to Ukraine and Azerbijan to Armenia are proportionally very comparable in population and economic size. 150M (including LNR/DNR) to 36M vs 10M to 3M and both larger countries also have higher gdp per capita. In NK war Armenia had better defensive terrain but in RU/UA war UA has massive arms support from the West. Obviously not over yet but Russia’s battlefield result seems superior so far.
Also to be clear, I support Ukraine in this conflict and don’t believe Russia has any reasonable justification for this brutal invasion. Further their political and strategic conception for this operation was terribly flawed. Just don’t think that there is anyway to look at Azerbaijan’s result as a more impressive performance showcasing their superior doctrine and integration of modern weapons.
One of my grandparents is from central Ukraine. German policies were awful there (kept collective farms intact, starved people, kidnapped people and sent them as slave labor to Germany) but regular soldiers were far less savage and more decent than the Russian troops have been in Ukraine.
For example one of my grandparent’s sisters was pregnant and went into labor, when some German soldiers found out she was in distress they organized a trip to a hospital where she gave birth safely.
- possible Russian action taken against civilians deemed as helping Kiev regime forces
- possible Kiev regime killing of some deemed as collaborators.
I rather suspected as much. Most wignats are wing-nuts. You seem far too lucid to fit that mold.
I find myself in a similar position, the term IslamoGloboHomo is not something that could be used anywhere else. Truth about the sexual deviance and violence inherent in the Muslim tradition would have to be metered out in a much more measured and discreet fashion.
It comes down to the “Foxhole Test”. If you were fighting for your life would you prefer to be in a foxhole with:
-A- Black American Christian?
-B- White Iranian Muslim?
As a Christian, I want to live. Thus, ” A” is obviously the correct answer. No matter how fair skinned, even Aryan, a Persian might appear — the core value of Islam is killing Christians. Choosing “B” is suicidal.
___
HBD differences between groups exists. When dealing with large-scale issues like mass migration, that impact should be considered. However, on an individual level, having a stable 2-parent family & a traditional values church can help almost any kid become a good person.
PEACE 😇
You’ll get problems with either character as your trench neighbour.
Bedroom test is a lot more likely. An Iranian Muslim woman can convert and pass. Impossible for black woman. Your own family has a good likelihood of Muslim sourced DNA sneaking around in there.
People who accuse others of “no interest in a genuine discussion” often do it to avoid a genuine discussion. It is not just about hypocrisy – it is simply about seeing the world in its context. If a thief is shouting “thief! catch him”, it is appropriate to mention that as a thief he is not in a strong position to lecture others.
The vocabulary you use is also peculiar: “arguably”, “…anti-partisan warfare”, “causing death” (not killing them then?). That was my point. If the Russian troops are doing ugly things I am sure we will get all the details – the bias is to do that. The bias is to underplay it with the Ukies or the West. To focus razor sharp only on one side is an issue way beyond hypocrisy.
One thing that really amazes me about this war in Ukraine is the way that it has brought national ethnocentrism to the fore, in Eastern Europeans, in a way that I never thought to see among any Europeans, again.
What is easiest to perceive is the anti-Russian animus, which comes through in strange ways. It is not only about soldiers, but people point to a video of rural bumpkins, including children, cheering their soldiers at sendoff, and say, “See, it is all Russians!” Which makes me wonder what the implication is supposed to be – are these people suggesting that Russian civilians be bombed?
And, what is even weirder, and, perhaps, speaks to the spirit of our age is how these animuses have been transplanted into other European countries, like Germany, by expats. Some Eastern Europeans are saying that Russians should be deported from Germany. (Not the blacks, Turks, or Arabs, but the Russians!) There are supposedly singing genocidal songs outside the Bundestag.
It’s delusional and comes at a high cost to France, Germany and Italy.Replies: @songbird, @Dmitry, @AP
Putinist rightoids have no doubts about false flag cases while I am merely considering to give them a fair hearing.
In terms of propaganda or anti propaganda here is an interesting video. Was it made by Ukrainians who are too dense to realize that people know of Ukrainians' love for farm tools as weapons of choice in carrying out massacres and genocides or is it anti-Ukrainian video that alludes to their love affair with farm tools - a pitchfork is a national symbol?
https://twitter.com/IsraelKebedew/status/1513653583895486472?cxt=HHwWkICz0cb6yYEqAAAA
My personal opinion is that this is a case of Ukrainians shooting themselves in the foot just like AP because of excessive pride and chutzpah.Replies: @German_reader, @A123, @AP, @Peripatetic Commenter
A response has appeared to this video:
https://twitter.com/realGonzaloLira/status/1513942397801086980
Women should stay out of men’s business!
Cringe Death Metal.
They should have told her to make them a sandwich.
Seriously? Even in Chechnya and Dagestan 99% of the population understands Russian. Do you really think the Russian federation just lets people in Tuva, Yakhutia or whatever to be educated entirely in their native language? That some Buryat follows physical gestures of other troops without understanding orders being said? THINK before writing such incredibly stupid comments pls.
First, partly, it is a temporal reference to today and WW2. (The second part was unvoiced but implicit). Can you attest to their language proficiency in WW2?
Secondly, have you really played telephone between Ukrainians and the people from these republics? Frankly, I think you have never even been to Tuva or Chechnya. If so, you may be pretending to a false confidence.
I'm sure, on paper, they are taught in Russian. But are those places the most prestigious to be teachers? Are they as intelligent in the Caucasian republics? What language do they actually speak at home, or with their friends?
There are many different factors at play here, from accents to actual fluidity - different from paper stats.
English is mandatory in many countries. No language has more pervasive cultural intrusion, and yet, there are many, many young people who are not fluent in English, despite being instructed in it. And that is in 100 IQ countries, not a place like Chechnya.
Tense situations require absolute fluidity, in the lowest orders. Military operations only require it in the highest orders.
Women make videos, men are out in the battlefield.
Maybe your comment sounded logical to you, but it does sound funny from the Russian perspective. These populations (Caucasians, et al) are not typically patriotic, but rather more towards the opposite on average – there is a lot of anti-Russian views. You can even see their comments everywhere online.
They go to the army because they are such poor regions and the money in the contract is actually better than almost anything there, with very few jobs.
You know the analogy of the situation is maybe like Indian soldiers in the British Empire, or African soldiers in the French army.
Senegalese were always working as soldiers in the French army since the middle 19th century. You go to the colony and recruit the professional soldiers there.
Nationalist protests by Caucasians are definitely not allowed in Russia, especially when there is Islamic nationalism. You know there are a lot of issues constantly in Dagestan.
And of course in Chechnya requires almost the world’s most strong repression to maintain the state control.
West Virginia might have patriotic white people, that identify with the country, and the US army is a prestigious job in America.
Most caucasian nationalities in Russia are have “difficult” relationship with the Russian Federation, to say mildly, and going to army is anti-prestigious.
It is like going to the prison. Everyone wants to avoid conscriptions. There are enough nightmare stories. According to the folk rumours, slavic nationalities often at the bottom of the social ranking there, and many stories of junior soldier beaten (even raped) by the senior soldiers.
Becoming a contractor is even more related to economics filter, than just the months as a conscript. It’s really people from the depressed zones which are signing the contracts.
This is also why it’s less politically sensitive to use the contractors in Ukraine, as there will be very few middle or even inner city people there. So casualties are with the more voiceless demographics. Among conscripts, you would start to see more middle class deaths (although even the vast majority middle class people avoid the conscription).
Do you need any more proof that Putler and those that support his war efforts in Ukraine are total wackos? Check out this article taken from Substack and also avail yourself to the actual Russian documents that Snyder is criticizing (in both English and Russian). I hope that Ron Unz reads it, as he seems to have gone full Kremlin here at his blogsite, creating a sort of “Kremlin Stooge Central”. All except for possibly Steve Sailer.
https://snyder.substack.com/p/russias-genocide-handbook?s=r
https://medium.com/@kravchenko_mm/what-should-russia-do-with-ukraine-translation-of-a-propaganda-article-by-a-russian-journalist-a3e92e3cb64
https://ria.ru/20220403/ukraina-1781469605.html
…and making more than plenty of real battle videos about ongoing demilitarisation of RF army on UA soil 😉
As usual RF propaganda is yet again full of weak BS here lol
With many of them getting killed.
Excellent insight:
Turns out they now have the technological edge over Russia's 1970s and 1980s throwback army.
I guess there's such a fine line between those two scenarios that we shouldn't fault someone for being thrown off by the ambiguities.
What's more, this is why I don't make predictions, and I never will! :)Replies: @Dmitry
It sounded like you are merging AP’s comments with my comments.
We both know Ukraine has an old army, with mostly equipment of the 1970s. In the last months, they are receiving supplies including more modern equipment from the West, but this is still limited by ease of use (they don’t receive anything that would require a lot of training, apart from Javelins which were first received in 2018 giving them time to train with them). They also use some improvised 21st century consumer equipment,
Before the war, I thought the Russian army might have been a bit modernized (although I was still a bit skeptical), but this is because I am completely non-expert person, who is gullible to the propaganda. Some of my views are created having years of state controlled Russian media. As we started to write on this forum within a couple days of the beginning or war (around February 26), most of the Russian equipment and abilities, are still in the 1970s/1980s.
But more knowledgeable people would have been able to write this before the beginning of the war. Ukrainian authorities would have known. This is why Aaronb’s claim that Ukrainian resistance was a sign of the triumph of irrationalism, is far from the reality.
They also had something about Buryat troops quartered on civilian property...one soldier at first wanted to rape the 14-year old daughter of a family, but then settled for the mother, while the grandmother had to watch. Really amazing that Russian soldiers are apparently still the ill-disciplined rabble they have always been, I have to admit I was somewhat surprised about this, because I had bought the propaganda that the Russian army nowadays is more professional.
You're right that these kind of stories (which are objectively bad, even if one thinks talk of "genocide" is over-blown, there is no real way to defend the conduct of the Russian soldiers involved) will have an effect. Which I have never denied btw, but then what I'm actually writing hasn't mattered to you for some time.Replies: @AP, @Yevardian
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beating_of_Andrey_Sychyov
https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/world-news/russian-soldiers-genitals-amputated-after-26657628
Don’t be surprised. I recall there was some PR shakeup of the military administration after this incident (it was too extreme even Russian state media to ignore), but after things had settled, nobody important was fired, just ‘reshuffled’. Though how then-defense minister Sergei Ivanov handled it and allowed it happen played a large part in frustrating his ambition to become Prime Minister (instead went to his rival Medvedev, apparently they both personally despise each other). Army staff later complained that Ivanov’s successor as defense minister, Serdyukov apparently filled the army with ‘female bean-counters’ or something like that, so he was replaced with Shoigu, who was welcomed by brass for restoring ‘traditional norms’ in the army culture (whatever that means).
And overall, I don’t know why I expected the Russian army to perform better, though I definitely expected the Ukrainian one to perform worse, as it suffers from similar problems. The human capital that goes into the Russian army now is in fact, far lower than it was during the Soviet Union, both because Soviet conscription casted a much wider net, and a military career was held in much higher esteem then than now.
Yevardian, you are bad at understanding context.
First, partly, it is a temporal reference to today and WW2. (The second part was unvoiced but implicit). Can you attest to their language proficiency in WW2?
Secondly, have you really played telephone between Ukrainians and the people from these republics? Frankly, I think you have never even been to Tuva or Chechnya. If so, you may be pretending to a false confidence.
I’m sure, on paper, they are taught in Russian. But are those places the most prestigious to be teachers? Are they as intelligent in the Caucasian republics? What language do they actually speak at home, or with their friends?
There are many different factors at play here, from accents to actual fluidity – different from paper stats.
English is mandatory in many countries. No language has more pervasive cultural intrusion, and yet, there are many, many young people who are not fluent in English, despite being instructed in it. And that is in 100 IQ countries, not a place like Chechnya.
Tense situations require absolute fluidity, in the lowest orders. Military operations only require it in the highest orders.
Tuva is very like an Indigenous American reservation in the United States of America. Their traditional society has been destroyed and the government does not invest anything, abandons them. Shoigu doesn’t care, and having all these years Lyudmila Sobchak as their senator doesn’t seem very effective. Their poverty is even useful for their exploitation as a source of soldiers.
Still, the most exploited nationality are Yakuts, as they should be one of the wealthiest place, considering how many resources exist on their land. But almost all surplus income from those resources is going to enrich Moscow, or further (to London and Marbella), while cities freeze, their infrastructure is not highly rated, and you get the pollution without the benefits. Well, emigration to China, is becoming a popular option there.
BY ROBERT FROSTSome say the world will end in fire,
Some say in ice.
From what I’ve tasted of desire
I hold with those who favor fire.
But if it had to perish twice,
I think I know enough of hate
To say that for destruction ice
Is also great
And would suffice.
Herpies Girl.
Cringe Death Metal.
They should have told her to make them a sandwich.
-B- White Iranian Muslim?As a Christian, I want to live. Thus, " A" is obviously the correct answer. No matter how fair skinned, even Aryan, a Persian might appear -- the core value of Islam is killing Christians. Choosing "B" is suicidal.
___ HBD differences between groups exists. When dealing with large-scale issues like mass migration, that impact should be considered. However, on an individual level, having a stable 2-parent family & a traditional values church can help almost any kid become a good person.PEACE 😇Replies: @Wokechoke, @silviosilver, @Emil Nikola Richard, @songbird
Why would you share a unit with either?
You’ll get problems with either character as your trench neighbour.
Deputy CEO of Aeroflot (a large airline in Russia, that is a 60/40 public–private partnership), had quit and emigrated to Israel (probably to avoid sanctions), while its CEO (Poluboyarinov) has been sanctioned by the EU.
Aeroflot has been viewed as quite successful in recent years with growing numbers of flights, but it might not be so interesting from the business perspective, as perhaps some significant reason of its success is just from government flooding so much money to the company.
https://www.zeit.de/mobilitaet/2022-03/russia-migration-aeroflot-andrej-panow-english/seite-3
Much of the fleet cannot now fly outside Russia, as it has been removed from foreign owners. There was a YouTube discussion about this problem of the aviation industry in Russia.
What will happen to Imran Khan?
Will he hold onto power? Or will he return to England, and become Sadiq Khan’s protege?
What is easiest to perceive is the anti-Russian animus, which comes through in strange ways. It is not only about soldiers, but people point to a video of rural bumpkins, including children, cheering their soldiers at sendoff, and say, "See, it is all Russians!" Which makes me wonder what the implication is supposed to be - are these people suggesting that Russian civilians be bombed?
And, what is even weirder, and, perhaps, speaks to the spirit of our age is how these animuses have been transplanted into other European countries, like Germany, by expats. Some Eastern Europeans are saying that Russians should be deported from Germany. (Not the blacks, Turks, or Arabs, but the Russians!) There are supposedly singing genocidal songs outside the Bundestag.Replies: @Wokechoke
In the same way that Russians think that Ukrainians are some kind of Russians, Poles and Ukrainians think they are some kind of Europeans.
It’s delusional and comes at a high cost to France, Germany and Italy.
I've said before that I think people are disconnected from the land. IMO, part of that is the way they travel across national borders, raising rents, jumping into IQ shredders, and generally commoditizing labor, and thus helping to break the social compact between the rich and poor.
The Schengen area was very ill-thought out, for a variety of reasons, one being Gypsies. But another being that it has facilitated migration into Europe.
Still, the most exploited nationality are Yakuts, as they should be one of the wealthiest place, considering how many resources exist on their land. But almost all surplus income from those resources is going to enrich Moscow, or further (to London and Marbella), while cities freeze, their infrastructure is not highly rated, and you get the pollution without the benefits. Well, emigration to China, is becoming a popular option there.Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Yahya
Still, the most exploited nationality are Yakuts, as they should be one of the wealthiest place, considering how many resources exist on their land. But almost all surplus income from those resources is going to enrich Moscow, or further (to London and Marbella), while cities freeze, their infrastructure is not highly rated, and you get the pollution without the benefits. Well, emigration to China, is becoming a popular option there.Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Yahya
Interesting mini-documentary on life in Yakutiya:
Fire and Ice
BY ROBERT FROST
Some say the world will end in fire,
Some say in ice.
From what I’ve tasted of desire
I hold with those who favor fire.
But if it had to perish twice,
I think I know enough of hate
To say that for destruction ice
Is also great
And would suffice.
It’s delusional and comes at a high cost to France, Germany and Italy.Replies: @songbird, @Dmitry, @AP
I would say that they are both right, to a degree.
I don’t feel knowledgeable enough to evaluate the costs. Though, I think I heard that Eastern Europeans are usually a small net drain, tax-wise, in Western Europe. Not considering other costs, and I suspect that there are more – not just for the host country – but also the country they leave.
I’ve said before that I think people are disconnected from the land. IMO, part of that is the way they travel across national borders, raising rents, jumping into IQ shredders, and generally commoditizing labor, and thus helping to break the social compact between the rich and poor.
The Schengen area was very ill-thought out, for a variety of reasons, one being Gypsies. But another being that it has facilitated migration into Europe.
So I spent some time today digesting details of the war, something I haven’t been interested in up till now.
I think AK’s prediction that “shock and disbelief are inevitable” may yet be fulfilled – only that, Croesus-like, the shock and disbelief may be his own.
[For those unfamiliar with it, legend has it that Croesus, ruler of a large kingdom in western Anatolia, consulted an oracle about the prospects of going to war with the Persians. The oracle prophesied that if he went to war, a great empire would be destroyed. Thus encouraged, he warred on the Persians and was defeated – the empire that was destroyed was his own.]
Also, regarding the complaints about posting quality since the departure of several respected posters, true enough, but it’s notable how few of the remaining posters seem to miss AK himself. (I don’t. AK: “My consistent position has been that failure must always be brutally punished” Yeah, I can do without garbage-tier takes like that. Why must it be “brutally” punished? Oh, ’cause you’re larping as an unsentimental tough guy, I forgot.)
My intuition for why AK's sudden oversensitivity and appearance of mental collapse when we were not hagiographic about him, was because he does not have much interesting in real life, so therefore his blogger's persona became unusually important for him. This was perhaps the only way he was receiving attention from people and this created the emotional fragility. But there was a cycle there, as the reason he doesn't have much real life, would be partly lack of social skills. And this lack of social understanding is what created the blogger's persona. At the same time, his blog was entertaining for all of us, and generates a lot of clicks. His blog was great in those ways and allowed us to generate ourselves all kinds of interesting writings, which was more interesting and knowledgeable than his writing, and sometimes he seems to understand the comedy. Maybe we are being ungrateful by not avoiding to tread on his sore points, and to pretend his blogs are "geopolitical analysis" in return for his favor. His bloggers' persona seems to have many of those things which social outcast from school days, might think will be impressive for other people. So, he was pretending to be an "unsentimental tough guy", without seeming to know that adults view this negatively. Actually unsentimental cynical people, are pretending to be sentimental.He was also trying to boost his blogger persona ego by connecting his online life to country he has touristical kind of connection to, even while everyone of us is usually doing the opposite, and we all try to disconnect ourselves from government propaganda and official views. At a point a couple years past, his blog was almost Dada art, when he was posting his appearance as a Turkish taxi driver, while writing to people he is a Russian nationalist
- like the Clayton Bigsby joke (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BLNDqxrUUwQ.). A few people like Mr Hack seemed to understand the joke. Anon4/Bashibuzuk couldn't enjoy the joke and was triggered. But the tension with this Dada art, is that you are not quite sure if a person is really joking, and you are a bit scared to write anything about. When Aaronb is doing spiritualism writings, he sometimes ruins his joke by adding an emoji.Replies: @utu, @Thulean Friend, @Emil Nikola Richard
But on the historical issue concerned, I think you do have a point, it is likely that among the Red army soldiers who committed war crimes in Germany (and Hungary, probably also to some extent in Poland) in 1945 there were many Ukrainians. Due to its huge losses the Red army filled up its ranks in 1944 with people from the recently liberated (or "liberated") territories, including many Ukrainians, many of whom may have collaborated with the Germans before or been involved in the interethnic conflicts of wartime Ukraine, so may have had previous experience of extreme violence.
Regarding the general issue, I don't think Russian soldiers commit war crimes because of their genes or general culture or whatever, imo it's because of how the Russian army has traditionally treated its soldiers (and various situational factors), probably Western Europeans would behave in a similar way in such an environment.
Regarding your spat with AP, it's funny how quickly you change your opinion (suddenly going on about the possibility of Ukrainian "false flag" actions...just like the Putinist rightoids you claim to despise)...really petty :-)Replies: @AP, @utu, @Emil Nikola Richard, @S
And to the extent that it is true, where exactly did that brutalization (Dedovshchina) of the Russian soldier originate? And for that matter, the (likely related) inordinate losses of men in battle that Russia has all too often experienced?
Not to sound patronizing (my own Euro tribe have plenty of their own problems) I would say it’s origins can ultimately be found not in any purported incompetence, lack of intelligence, or poor leadership, but in the centuries that the Russian people were under the Mongol Yoke, where Russian life counted for nothing, and that this ‘value’ was internalized.
If I was Russian I would make it job one to undo that particular damage to the Russian spirit, of which I am sure there are many Russians doing just that.
They've also had promotions and partnerships with Google, Apple, Sony, KFC and others.
None of this is surprising because the devs are based in Shanghai. Shanghai is the most pro-Western/liberal city in mainland China.
Of course, although the game is pro-West and pro-Globohomo, it will still be smeared by Jew propagandists because being Chinese is the new Original Sin.Replies: @Yellowface Anon
Mihoyo and Yostar are the next in line for expropriation.
One thing is certain: nobody who recently printed money because of covid lockdowns anticipated this disruption from Chinese lockdowns, or the fissure with Russia. I think they are very much groping their way through darkness, with their scientism failing them at every turn, including with "green energy", which I think is really the just an extension of the idea that we have mastered the earth and sun.Replies: @Yellowface Anon, @AaronB
Explicitly buy from and invest in Russia, if your economy is being broadly sanctioned anyway.
We can say Putin attended Davos as much as Bill Gates funded the Wuhan lab responsible for COVID. Those who know, know.
But I don't think Putin is pretending. His stress seems genuine.Replies: @Yellowface Anon, @Thulean Friend
It was reported yesterday that Putler purged 100 top FSB officers recently and more personnel too. Yikes! It’s well know that the Security Services are at the top of the Russian power verticle. 4-5, would be normal at this point, but almost all of the “Fifth Service” responsible for the oversight of intelligence about former Soviet territories such as Ukraine? Incredible. Was there more to this story than meets the eye, I mean more than just Beseda being a possible mole? Why so many?
https://www.businessinsider.com/putin-purges-fsb-over-ukraine-failures-bellingcat-expert-2022-4
Anecdotal example. During WW II, many German regulars were civil when not faced with dire circumstances. This attitude was subject to change when things became more difficult for them.
As a rhetorical counter to what you said, it could also be said that the Germans of that era were kinder than Kiev regime forces towards Donbass rebel area residents. A couple of eastern ethnic Ukrainians I know told me of Kiev regime forces leveling neighborhoods where there were no armed rebels.
A few years back, a friend’s cousin was pulled over by regime forces near the Lugansk area, during his taxi job. He was given two choices of either getting arrested as a terrorist, or joining the regime forces. He chose the latter.
A WSJ article suggests Russian troops in Bucha were initially quite polite and only changed a bit after the reasonable suspicion that some of the residents were channeling info to Kiev regime forces. I’m fast becoming of the impression that up to three factors could be at play in Bucha:
– possible collateral damage from Kiev regime shelling when Russian forces were there
– possible Russian action taken against civilians deemed as helping Kiev regime forces
– possible Kiev regime killing of some deemed as collaborators.
I think AK's prediction that "shock and disbelief are inevitable" may yet be fulfilled - only that, Croesus-like, the shock and disbelief may be his own.
[For those unfamiliar with it, legend has it that Croesus, ruler of a large kingdom in western Anatolia, consulted an oracle about the prospects of going to war with the Persians. The oracle prophesied that if he went to war, a great empire would be destroyed. Thus encouraged, he warred on the Persians and was defeated - the empire that was destroyed was his own.]
Also, regarding the complaints about posting quality since the departure of several respected posters, true enough, but it's notable how few of the remaining posters seem to miss AK himself. (I don't. AK: "My consistent position has been that failure must always be brutally punished" Yeah, I can do without garbage-tier takes like that. Why must it be "brutally" punished? Oh, 'cause you're larping as an unsentimental tough guy, I forgot.)Replies: @Dmitry, @Thulean Friend
It should be always a pleasure when Utu insults us in the forum, because it’s good to see our “internet writing” not too seriously. Afterall we are writing here for procrastination and writing is enjoyable when you did it without caring for its results.
My intuition for why AK’s sudden oversensitivity and appearance of mental collapse when we were not hagiographic about him, was because he does not have much interesting in real life, so therefore his blogger’s persona became unusually important for him. This was perhaps the only way he was receiving attention from people and this created the emotional fragility.
But there was a cycle there, as the reason he doesn’t have much real life, would be partly lack of social skills. And this lack of social understanding is what created the blogger’s persona.
At the same time, his blog was entertaining for all of us, and generates a lot of clicks. His blog was great in those ways and allowed us to generate ourselves all kinds of interesting writings, which was more interesting and knowledgeable than his writing, and sometimes he seems to understand the comedy. Maybe we are being ungrateful by not avoiding to tread on his sore points, and to pretend his blogs are “geopolitical analysis” in return for his favor.
His bloggers’ persona seems to have many of those things which social outcast from school days, might think will be impressive for other people. So, he was pretending to be an “unsentimental tough guy”, without seeming to know that adults view this negatively. Actually unsentimental cynical people, are pretending to be sentimental.
He was also trying to boost his blogger persona ego by connecting his online life to country he has touristical kind of connection to, even while everyone of us is usually doing the opposite, and we all try to disconnect ourselves from government propaganda and official views.
At a point a couple years past, his blog was almost Dada art, when he was posting his appearance as a Turkish taxi driver, while writing to people he is a Russian nationalist
– like the Clayton Bigsby joke (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BLNDqxrUUwQ.). A few people like Mr Hack seemed to understand the joke. Anon4/Bashibuzuk couldn’t enjoy the joke and was triggered. But the tension with this Dada art, is that you are not quite sure if a person is really joking, and you are a bit scared to write anything about. When Aaronb is doing spiritualism writings, he sometimes ruins his joke by adding an emoji.
Internet produces weirdness. What is the a priori world's most famous queer right wing man announces he is now into women?
Maybe the resident website amateur psycho will opine on Karlin's obvious repressed homosexuality.
It’s delusional and comes at a high cost to France, Germany and Italy.Replies: @songbird, @Dmitry, @AP
This part of your comment is very well written, and it’s partly result of the fact they are (or were) almost Russians, as this is also one of the most beloved and problematical delusions of Russian history.
I won’t include Poles, as they are more or less like Europeans nowadays. And if Poles can, it’s not impossible for Ukrainians/Russians one day.
If Europe is a particular political model or set of political ideals similar to that promoted by the EU, and a certain standard of living, you could say that Ukraine, Belarus, Moldova are not European, but by these standards neither were large parts of Western Europe till recently. If Poland and Portugal are European in this way now, no obvious reason Ukraine can't be.
Core Western countries have been undergoing a cultural revolution for a couple of decades (demographic change is only one part of it), with uncertain final results, here France is the example but something similar goes for the UK, Italy, probably Germany, so the understanding of what it means to be European is likely evolve again:
https://unherd.com/2022/04/america-has-captured-france/
Notice the de Maistre quoting hipsters are back in France...Replies: @Wokechoke, @Dmitry
My intuition for why AK's sudden oversensitivity and appearance of mental collapse when we were not hagiographic about him, was because he does not have much interesting in real life, so therefore his blogger's persona became unusually important for him. This was perhaps the only way he was receiving attention from people and this created the emotional fragility. But there was a cycle there, as the reason he doesn't have much real life, would be partly lack of social skills. And this lack of social understanding is what created the blogger's persona. At the same time, his blog was entertaining for all of us, and generates a lot of clicks. His blog was great in those ways and allowed us to generate ourselves all kinds of interesting writings, which was more interesting and knowledgeable than his writing, and sometimes he seems to understand the comedy. Maybe we are being ungrateful by not avoiding to tread on his sore points, and to pretend his blogs are "geopolitical analysis" in return for his favor. His bloggers' persona seems to have many of those things which social outcast from school days, might think will be impressive for other people. So, he was pretending to be an "unsentimental tough guy", without seeming to know that adults view this negatively. Actually unsentimental cynical people, are pretending to be sentimental.He was also trying to boost his blogger persona ego by connecting his online life to country he has touristical kind of connection to, even while everyone of us is usually doing the opposite, and we all try to disconnect ourselves from government propaganda and official views. At a point a couple years past, his blog was almost Dada art, when he was posting his appearance as a Turkish taxi driver, while writing to people he is a Russian nationalist
- like the Clayton Bigsby joke (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BLNDqxrUUwQ.). A few people like Mr Hack seemed to understand the joke. Anon4/Bashibuzuk couldn't enjoy the joke and was triggered. But the tension with this Dada art, is that you are not quite sure if a person is really joking, and you are a bit scared to write anything about. When Aaronb is doing spiritualism writings, he sometimes ruins his joke by adding an emoji.Replies: @utu, @Thulean Friend, @Emil Nikola Richard
“He was also trying to boost his blogger persona ego by connecting his online life to country he has touristical kind of connection to” – Good point. Indication of failure and frustration with his life in the US. More specifically San Fracisco. Perhaps he was hit on too many times by the fags of SF. Moscow is where he could save his ass’s innocence, literally. Instead of dealing with the advances of flamboyant fags of SF he has the charming vatniks of Moscow to deal with. Nothing gives you greater prestige boost in vatniks’ eyes than being a hyper-warmonger and the destroyer of the world.
twitter starting to shut down some of the accounts which are showing what’s actually happening. i wonder what took them so long. i guess it takes twitter a while to find them.
George Webb’s coverage has been pretty good. different perspective than most of the war coverage accounts. definitely something going on in Mariupol. some important people trapped there that NATO is trying to get out. but not sure who.
“And if Poles can, it’s not impossible for Ukrainians/Russians one day.” – No question about it. Ukrainians can and they are in the process of creating their modern ethnogenesis and foundation myths that are congruent with the Western values that do not depend on Russia and the pathological myths based on genocide of Poles and Jews since Khmelnytsky till WWII. If they ditch the myths which will necessitate getting rid of unscrupulous propagandists and professional Ukrainian grifters like AP they will become a part of Europe. But with Russians it will be much more difficult. Russians will have to feel the defeat in this war really hard to abandon fantasies of imperialism and supremacy. Not sure it it will be possible. I am afraid that Moscow may opt for becoming another Tehran or Pyongyang.
propagandist - "person who promotes or publicizes a particular organization or cause" - true
professional - lie
Ukrainian - true
grifters - lieBe careful Utu, you are not quite there yet but are approaching Beckow's ratio of truth to lies. :::::::::::::::::::I will be travelling to Poland to drop off medical supplies that will be transported to Ukraine by others. While in Poland I will be visiting villages in Lemkivshchyna to see ancestors' graves and a village some of them had owned long ago. So I may post more sporadically for while.
His views include mixes of more upper class version of Tucker Carlson/"deplorable" in America, combined with pro-Ukraine, combined with some kremlinbot views (support for Potemkin villages). Then add support for conquistadors's warcrimes, support for Habsburg monarchy, not much interest in the European power-sharing or workers' rights, with views of anti-Soviet, pro-Poland, supporter of "Just World Hypothesis" (applied to HIV) etc. He also has panglossian views about topics like the income levels or culture in Ukraine, which does not match his views about America (where income and anglosaxon good behavior, is important) .
If you want to write propaganda for Ukraine, this is not what you would say. Moreover, he continues the same view mix of idiosyncrasy, without adjusting, and after Ukraine became the country most popular in the developed world, based on mapping about "democracy vs non-democracy". There is a forum user Jack D in the Steve Sailer forum, who has the most similar views overall with AP. But even Jack D does not have something this idiosyncratic to throw in the forums. Jack D's views about Ukraine and America are very similar to AP. Jack D has much more of the racist American views than AP, which also does not combine too well with his "Ellis Island immigrant" sympathy to Israel. As Israel is this chaotic, multiracial place, so how can American bourgeois person who support order and organized lawns, reconcile his values? A funny thing is when I argued with Jack D and AP about Russia, they both said things which I think are completely ridiculous. Then I checked them, and they were right and I am wrong. AP was actually correct more often than I am, when I argued with him about Russia. They both have somekind of mysterious intuitive knowledge in this area that can seem to match reality when you check, more than locals' common sense views.Replies: @utu
Or before that, level NYC, London or Brussels, so that outside of Beijing, its imperial supremacy is unchallenged. No one openly trades with Moscow, Tehran and Pyongyang because these 3 cities exist.
-B- White Iranian Muslim?As a Christian, I want to live. Thus, " A" is obviously the correct answer. No matter how fair skinned, even Aryan, a Persian might appear -- the core value of Islam is killing Christians. Choosing "B" is suicidal.
___ HBD differences between groups exists. When dealing with large-scale issues like mass migration, that impact should be considered. However, on an individual level, having a stable 2-parent family & a traditional values church can help almost any kid become a good person.PEACE 😇Replies: @Wokechoke, @silviosilver, @Emil Nikola Richard, @songbird
It is a choice between Scylla and Charybdis you offer me. In various contexts I might choose – reluctantly, of course – one or the other, but since you specified a foxhole, I guess I’d have to go with the Christian. There’s really no doubting a shared religion’s power to forge bonds between racially disparate individuals. It doesn’t happen often enough, but when it does, it’s powerful stuff. Even for someone like me. I am far from a true believing Christian, and have no problem subjecting that faith to withering criticism, but I still retain enough fondness for it that’s quite easy to ‘revert’ to a faithful mindset when the situation calls for it – as it would in a foxhole. If there’s a good chance I’m gonna meet my maker, it may as well be fighting alongside a Christian brother.
This, however, is complete crap, and carries a nauseating stench of “Made in Tel Aviv,” regardless of whether you’re really the southerner you claim you are or not (I personally doubt it, but who knows).
I have had fiercely loyal Arab and Turk muzz friends, who have stuck by me in fights. My memories of them are tinged with a kind of sadness that, despite being very good friends with them, I was never able to completely overlook the muzz factor (I am no libtard, after all), and I have to assume the same was true for them; meaning that during relaxed times the religious factor could be ignored, but there are always moments, including subtle ones, where the divide makes itself felt. Life is just like that, and there’s really no point lamenting it or fantasizing like a libtard – hate to repeat myself, but ptui, fucking delusional morons – that it can somehow be changed “if we simply want it enough.”
However, the Infidel is never a "friend". There is never "loyalty" to the expendable non-Muslim. According to Muhammad, deceiving & manipulating Infidels is encouraged as it makes them easier to kill.
You are lucky to be alive.
PEACE 😇Replies: @silviosilver
I was going to write to Wokechoke that his comment is strange, at least from personal experience, if you are in Ukraine, Belarus, maybe the Western regions of Russia that border them are similar, you don’t get the feel that you are in somewhere non-European, it’s more the opposite, …here are some other Northern European people, reports that Asia begins when you cross the Bug were misleading.
If Europe is a particular political model or set of political ideals similar to that promoted by the EU, and a certain standard of living, you could say that Ukraine, Belarus, Moldova are not European, but by these standards neither were large parts of Western Europe till recently. If Poland and Portugal are European in this way now, no obvious reason Ukraine can’t be.
Core Western countries have been undergoing a cultural revolution for a couple of decades (demographic change is only one part of it), with uncertain final results, here France is the example but something similar goes for the UK, Italy, probably Germany, so the understanding of what it means to be European is likely evolve again:
https://unherd.com/2022/04/america-has-captured-france/
Notice the de Maistre quoting hipsters are back in France…
Timothy Snyder has written some good books on this region and is a respected historian, but he seems off the mark here; the rhetoric in that Russian document looks mostly Soviet legacy combined with Woke, it seems to position Russia as a defender of the progressive European outlook, little to no right-wing ideology is present in it, maybe a sliver at the end.
The document could easily be read as putting forward a case for a form of ethnocide though, if Ukrainians were reading this, I would not be surprised if they became angry and hostile towards Moscow. Not sure what its real propaganda value would be.
My intuition for why AK's sudden oversensitivity and appearance of mental collapse when we were not hagiographic about him, was because he does not have much interesting in real life, so therefore his blogger's persona became unusually important for him. This was perhaps the only way he was receiving attention from people and this created the emotional fragility. But there was a cycle there, as the reason he doesn't have much real life, would be partly lack of social skills. And this lack of social understanding is what created the blogger's persona. At the same time, his blog was entertaining for all of us, and generates a lot of clicks. His blog was great in those ways and allowed us to generate ourselves all kinds of interesting writings, which was more interesting and knowledgeable than his writing, and sometimes he seems to understand the comedy. Maybe we are being ungrateful by not avoiding to tread on his sore points, and to pretend his blogs are "geopolitical analysis" in return for his favor. His bloggers' persona seems to have many of those things which social outcast from school days, might think will be impressive for other people. So, he was pretending to be an "unsentimental tough guy", without seeming to know that adults view this negatively. Actually unsentimental cynical people, are pretending to be sentimental.He was also trying to boost his blogger persona ego by connecting his online life to country he has touristical kind of connection to, even while everyone of us is usually doing the opposite, and we all try to disconnect ourselves from government propaganda and official views. At a point a couple years past, his blog was almost Dada art, when he was posting his appearance as a Turkish taxi driver, while writing to people he is a Russian nationalist
- like the Clayton Bigsby joke (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BLNDqxrUUwQ.). A few people like Mr Hack seemed to understand the joke. Anon4/Bashibuzuk couldn't enjoy the joke and was triggered. But the tension with this Dada art, is that you are not quite sure if a person is really joking, and you are a bit scared to write anything about. When Aaronb is doing spiritualism writings, he sometimes ruins his joke by adding an emoji.Replies: @utu, @Thulean Friend, @Emil Nikola Richard
To my mind, Karlin does have clear narcissistic traits and when his audience is largely unimpressed by him and/or his opinions, he does lash out. But I wouldn’t go so far as to claim it’s because he has a bad life or whatever.
This feels a bit like a cope, IMO. I’ve had this discussion with you before. Karlin’s hostility towards blacks is too consistent and too visceral to be a joke. Ditto with his homophobia.
He had a life in SF and has done fairly well financially (e.g. crypto) so I don’t think he would have failed had he stayed there. He chose to repatriate to Russia and took a big hit financially. When people do that, they do it for ideological reasons.
Yes, his politics are pretty bizarre given that he’s a mixed-race Caucasoid but there are many instances of people with mixed ancestry embracing the far-right. One of the most notorious neo-Nazis in Sweden during the 1990s (Jackie Arklöf) was half-black. Last year, an adopted child from Colombia planned to commit violence against immigrant children. His room was full of white supremacist slogans (his parents were left-liberal green party supporters. When people have conflicted identities, it’s not uncommon for them to go for the extremes. Karlin has described himself as a “third culture kid”, so he acknowledges his split identity.
But having identity issues, narcissism etc isn’t a major deal. More consequential, I think, is that he is a ghoul. His cavalier attitude towards innocent people dying and his bloodthirsty enthusiasm for this war. That, more than his ancestry, is what makes him a discountable person in my eyes.
And of course Karlin's aversion to blacks (or whatever) is simply the aversion that any normal person would have to being surrounded by too many people are who too different to himself. Where people draw the line of "too much" differs from person to person, but only the most faggot-made personas are surprised by the phenomenon. How do you know those flags belong to immigrant households? A more plausible hypothesis is that they belong to ethnic Swedes who, upon feeling swamped by too many outsiders, discover that they actually do care about being Swedish - an experience that middle class Swedes, tucked away in their relative whitopias, haven't yet gone through.
That would make them less likely to go into the army if they were unpatriotic. Why die for a hated nation?
If they’re poorly paid, it makes even less sense. Throwing away your life is not a trivial decision and these areas send a very disproportionate large share of soldiers. Are you telling me these families do not value the lives of their own sons?
For many of them, it was a way to see the world and possibly root themselves in France. Caucasoids aren’t seeing the world (unless you think Donbass is exotic) nor do they need to root themselves in Russia, since they already live under the RF.
Many immigrant groups in Western Europe nurse a lot of grudges, yet in public polls still report much higher patriotism. In my neighbourhood, which is still heavily populated by those of immigrant-descent, it is very common to see Swedish flags. Far more so than when I lived in a middle-class Swedish area.
I do value your opinions on Russia, but on this topic I would only really accept the final say of someone who is from those regions and know the populations first-hand, preferably being part of them him/herself.
Genuine ethnic pluralism in Russia died with the Soviet Union. Titular ethnicities of many Republics like Mari or Udmurts are regularly targeted by Russian chauvinist local politicians, practice of their language receives token or no support, etc.
Chechnya and the Northeast Caucasus are different in this respect as hardly any Russians still live there, but they remain the poorest and most backwards regions of Russia. And although there are cultural and obviously serious political factors, I doubt this is due to inherent inferiority as IQ test worshippers like songbird would reduce all human variation down to (can't we all just get along and agree to hate Indians together?).
https://www.businessinsider.com/putin-purges-fsb-over-ukraine-failures-bellingcat-expert-2022-4Replies: @sudden death, @AP
What’s the point of purging some directorate of an agency, if you’re leaving the head of whole organization (Bortnikov) intact? Unless they were reporting directly to Putin, bypassing the head of FSB? Both these cases are signs of systemic failure anyway.
If Europe is a particular political model or set of political ideals similar to that promoted by the EU, and a certain standard of living, you could say that Ukraine, Belarus, Moldova are not European, but by these standards neither were large parts of Western Europe till recently. If Poland and Portugal are European in this way now, no obvious reason Ukraine can't be.
Core Western countries have been undergoing a cultural revolution for a couple of decades (demographic change is only one part of it), with uncertain final results, here France is the example but something similar goes for the UK, Italy, probably Germany, so the understanding of what it means to be European is likely evolve again:
https://unherd.com/2022/04/america-has-captured-france/
Notice the de Maistre quoting hipsters are back in France...Replies: @Wokechoke, @Dmitry
Britain is not a European country and doesn’t like to see itself as such.
I would not compare the patriotism of Indian/Assyrian/Iranian (etc.) immigrants to Sweden, whose first and perhaps second generation are still grateful to not live where they came from, and people like Chechens, Adyghe or Ingush who were brutally conquered in their own homelands over the course of the 19th Century. Ossetians are perhaps an exception, as they greatly expanded at the expense of other Caucasian peoples, chiefly Ingush, under Russian auspices.
Genuine ethnic pluralism in Russia died with the Soviet Union. Titular ethnicities of many Republics like Mari or Udmurts are regularly targeted by Russian chauvinist local politicians, practice of their language receives token or no support, etc.
Chechnya and the Northeast Caucasus are different in this respect as hardly any Russians still live there, but they remain the poorest and most backwards regions of Russia. And although there are cultural and obviously serious political factors, I doubt this is due to inherent inferiority as IQ test worshippers like songbird would reduce all human variation down to (can’t we all just get along and agree to hate Indians together?).
It’s delusional and comes at a high cost to France, Germany and Italy.Replies: @songbird, @Dmitry, @AP
It’s good that you admit that Russians are delusional when they claim that Ukrainians are a type of Russian. You are making progress.
Scrolling down and going to about the 17:54 mark, this segment with Scott Ritter is especially good for those out there, who’re readily accepting the Western mass media coverage of Russia-Ukraine:
https://wabcradio.com/episode/grand-scheme-4-12-22/
Towards the end of his interview with Frank Morano, Ritter convincingly addresses the underhanded attempt to belittle his input.
Just released:
https://theduran.com/1000-marines-surrender-elensky-holding-medvedchuk-hostage-putin-speaks-to-press-update-1/
Indeed. It’s nice to see that you agree with an idea that I have been promoting for years:
https://www.unz.com/akarlin/statue-exchange/#comment-4066999
“Khmelnytsky was a traitor and his main enemy was not a Pole but the Rus prince Jarema Vyshnevetski. Vyshnevetski kept the Tatars away from Ukraine, despite converting to Catholicism he built Orthodox monasteries and schools throughout Ukraine. The traitor Khmelytsky brought the Tatars to Ukraine, as a price for their help they carried 10,000s of Rus people into slavery (upper estimate goes as high as 200,000 total during the rebellion). Khmelnytsky’s men pillaged Orthodox churches and murdered priests and monks. Vyshnevetski’s men, who included 10,000s of Orthodox, saved some of those churches.”
https://www.unz.com/akarlin/last-reaction/#comment-4954102
“The Tatars were pillaging and destroying Ukrainian lands while they were allied to him. Tolerating their carrying off Rus slaves was a price the traitor Khmelnytsky was willing to pay for an alliance with them”
unscrupulous – lie
propagandist – “person who promotes or publicizes a particular organization or cause” – true
professional – lie
Ukrainian – true
grifters – lie
Be careful Utu, you are not quite there yet but are approaching Beckow’s ratio of truth to lies.
:::::::::::::::::::
I will be travelling to Poland to drop off medical supplies that will be transported to Ukraine by others. While in Poland I will be visiting villages in Lemkivshchyna to see ancestors’ graves and a village some of them had owned long ago. So I may post more sporadically for while.
Very well. Maps can simultaneously enhance and diminish our picture of reality, the latter by maps' necessarily omitting some features of the landscape. In some cases, adding more features to the map results in a better map. For instance, a map featuring both street circuits and street names will be more useful than a map with only street circuits.
But it should be clear that there's a limit to how many features you can add to a map, and that at some point there will be diminishing returns in terms of helpfulness with each new feature; and that if this process is taken to its logical conclusion, the map's features will eventually reach a 1:1 correspondence with reality itself, merely resulting in a duplicate of reality, which will not enhance your ability to navigate or understand reality at all.
So although it helps to remind ourselves that the map is not the territory, I don't see how this really helps develop a more holistic view of reality, since as far as our knowledge of reality goes, it's maps all the way down, such that any attempt to 'integrate' these maps runs smack into the aforementioned problem of 1:1 correspondence.Replies: @AaronB
What you’ve identified is the problem with “knowledge” itself – and why “knowledge” is limited and should not be our only mode of engagement with reality.
Maps, “abstract representations” – even the most complete – are just one way of engaging with reality, and a very limited one.
There is imagination, intuition, and direct sense contact and embodied engagement with reality.
That is why the mystics say that to see God, you have to dispense with maps altogether. They say you have to cease trying to “know” God through intellectual categories.
There is a great book from a 12th century English mystic called “The Cloud of Unknowing”, in which he says God can never be reached through knowledge, but only through love.
Our most important experiences – love, art, poetry, beauty – can not be “known”, but only hinted at, through abstract representations.
In terms of gaining more “knowledge”, imagination and intuition comes into contact with some aspect of reality, and we then construct abstract representations in order to “hint” at what can never be fully captured in abstract intellectual categories.
But if you’re trapped entirely in “mapland”, as we moderns increasingly are, imagination and intuition cannot play it’s role even in furthering “knowledge”.
We have adopted Descartes belief that we must only have clear, distinct, and certain ideas – yet imagination and intuition, which is our primary direct contact with reality, produces indistinct and unclear ideas.
Keats said we need “negative capability” – the ability to sit with uncertainty and not rush to form conclusions and certainties.
We’ve lost that today, and can no longer listen to the imagination – so we are no longer creative.
Einstein, who relief on imagination to come up with his theories, said his great regret was that he didn’t read the mystics when he was younger.
The idea that our conceptual net can ever create a 1:1 correspondence is to misunderstand reality and our concepts. No abstract representation can ever capture love or beauty or God.
Asian spiritual traditions are full of methods and techniques to not engage the world primarily through "conceptual knowledge", but through a larger awareness. Because all concepts are by their nature limiting - to define something means to exclude what it is not.
The task for modern civilization is precisely to downgrade "knowledge", and to return the unconscious to it's primary role as the larger enveloping context.
Becoming too conscious of what is supposed to remain implicit and undefined, kills life and vitality, because abstract representation can only capture a very small part and hint at the larger whole.
So to live only in consciousness is to live an impoverished existence, where you dwell only in a tiny part, the packaging, so to speak, which only hints at the chocolate beneath.
And is not the modern project since the Enlightenment precisely to live in entirely in hyper-consciousness, to ignore and forget what cannot be defined?
And so, we have cut ourselves off from vitality.
So, the problem with maps - one of the problems - is that they have to be precise.
A very simple example -
Let's take combat effectiveness. Things like morale, "esprit", and motivation play an absolutely enormous role in combat performance.
Butt these things can't be precisely defined or be measured - they are indistinct and unclear, yet vitally important, and can't be clearly represented on a map, so they get increasingly ignored.
And you get people like Karlin eventually saying they don't matter at all, and only number of men and tanks and planes etc matter.
Isn't that the predicament of our civilization - that we've become "stupid" to the extent we insist on only what can be defined?
So to get a more "holistic" picture you would have to include things that can't be represented on a map, cannot be precisely defined and measured.
And our modern civilization ignores that whole side of life, resulting in a delusionary view if reality.
Straight lines are a geometrical concept and geometry is a part of mathematics. But nobody knows what mathematics is. Is it just a product of our mind or does mathematics have its own independent existence that humans are just discovering and understanding? If so, how were mathematics created? Where do they come from? Even though they have proven to be a very useful tool for us to understand the natural world, most of mathematics have no practical use whatsoever but still they appear to "hold true". This is one of the most fascinating debates in my view. One of the very few where philosophers can still offer some gain in knowledge, provided they are also well trained in mathematics.
I guess it can be can argued that, even if math is just a product of the human mind, as some great scientists think, its concepts, such as a straight line, are also part of nature since they are the output of a mammal brain: an organ of a natural species like any other.Replies: @AaronB
https://www.businessinsider.com/putin-purges-fsb-over-ukraine-failures-bellingcat-expert-2022-4Replies: @sudden death, @AP
Obviously one doesn’t purge like this if things had gone well or according to plan. Russia has lost the first rounds in the evil war it had initiated, but the big battle is coming.
I make no predictions but I will say now what I said in February 24 that Ukraine has a real chance of winning (I think, better than back in February) and going for it is an acceptable course of action.
About half of the electorate voted to remain in the EU at in the Brexit referendum. The UK had been a member of the EU for 40 years. Social trends mostly follow those in other parts of Northern Europe.
Maps, "abstract representations" - even the most complete - are just one way of engaging with reality, and a very limited one.
There is imagination, intuition, and direct sense contact and embodied engagement with reality.
That is why the mystics say that to see God, you have to dispense with maps altogether. They say you have to cease trying to "know" God through intellectual categories.
There is a great book from a 12th century English mystic called "The Cloud of Unknowing", in which he says God can never be reached through knowledge, but only through love.
Our most important experiences - love, art, poetry, beauty - can not be "known", but only hinted at, through abstract representations.
In terms of gaining more "knowledge", imagination and intuition comes into contact with some aspect of reality, and we then construct abstract representations in order to "hint" at what can never be fully captured in abstract intellectual categories.
But if you're trapped entirely in "mapland", as we moderns increasingly are, imagination and intuition cannot play it's role even in furthering "knowledge".
We have adopted Descartes belief that we must only have clear, distinct, and certain ideas - yet imagination and intuition, which is our primary direct contact with reality, produces indistinct and unclear ideas.
Keats said we need "negative capability" - the ability to sit with uncertainty and not rush to form conclusions and certainties.
We've lost that today, and can no longer listen to the imagination - so we are no longer creative.
Einstein, who relief on imagination to come up with his theories, said his great regret was that he didn't read the mystics when he was younger.Replies: @AaronB, @AaronB, @Mikel
Reality, also, is inexhaustible, and this results not just in paradox and the coincidence of opposites, but also in something that remains “unknowable” even with the most complete “knowledge”.
The idea that our conceptual net can ever create a 1:1 correspondence is to misunderstand reality and our concepts. No abstract representation can ever capture love or beauty or God.
Asian spiritual traditions are full of methods and techniques to not engage the world primarily through “conceptual knowledge”, but through a larger awareness. Because all concepts are by their nature limiting – to define something means to exclude what it is not.
The task for modern civilization is precisely to downgrade “knowledge”, and to return the unconscious to it’s primary role as the larger enveloping context.
Becoming too conscious of what is supposed to remain implicit and undefined, kills life and vitality, because abstract representation can only capture a very small part and hint at the larger whole.
So to live only in consciousness is to live an impoverished existence, where you dwell only in a tiny part, the packaging, so to speak, which only hints at the chocolate beneath.
And is not the modern project since the Enlightenment precisely to live in entirely in hyper-consciousness, to ignore and forget what cannot be defined?
And so, we have cut ourselves off from vitality.
This is a funny exchange highlighting how Ritter is untrustworthy (and disgusting):
https://www.unz.com/isteve/putins-flawless-strategic-master-plan-is-working-out-perfectly/#comment-5287684
HA:
“What does his sex life have to do with his ability to comment about what is going on in the Ukraine war ?”
First of all, he was arrested twice, in 2001 and 2009, so this is presumably someone with poor impulse/craving management (though I wouldn’t dispute the obvious suspicion that both stings were the result of making some very powerful government officials very, very angry). Moreover, according to Wikipedia
Twinkie:
What those sordid episodes tell me is that he is a compromised character whose actions and words are untrustworthy.
That’s why in the saner days, the intelligence community used to reject homosexuals and other deviants.
HA:
Agreed. If anyone were to ever even suggest that Ritter be given a security clearance of any kind, the suggestion itself should be regarded as grounds for immediate termination. And that will have some impact on any intel-gathering he does on behalf of Russia or this “independent Russia Youtube analyst” shtick.
And I wasn’t clear enough earlier, so I’ll also note this: The police officer who nailed Ritter was actually a man, so that the profile he used in his catfishing sting presumably had photos of a woman who looked completely convincing as a 15-year-old. As in, no question whatsoever.
Nonetheless, Scott Ritter wants you to believe that someone who looks exactly like a 15-year-old and who has actually tells him “she” is 15, is actually an adult who is only fantasizing about being 15, and that is why he felt comfortable enough to expose himself to her. (That’s after attempting the same move some 8 years earlier.)
THAT is what Scott Ritter wants you to believe. And if that’s the only excuse your defense lawyer can dredge up on your behalf, that should tell you something. As in “tell me you’re 100% guilty without actually telling me, and while you’re at it, go ahead and insult me by assuming I’d ever be stupid enough to believe you again.”
Western affiliated media go censure-ballistic as the info about total collapse of Ukrainian forces in Mariupol cannot be hidden anymore. Just an example:
https://twitter.com/realGonzaloLira/status/1514194622968479751?cxt=HHwWjoC-7ZX_v4MqAAAA
MiniTrue at full power.
My intuition for why AK's sudden oversensitivity and appearance of mental collapse when we were not hagiographic about him, was because he does not have much interesting in real life, so therefore his blogger's persona became unusually important for him. This was perhaps the only way he was receiving attention from people and this created the emotional fragility. But there was a cycle there, as the reason he doesn't have much real life, would be partly lack of social skills. And this lack of social understanding is what created the blogger's persona. At the same time, his blog was entertaining for all of us, and generates a lot of clicks. His blog was great in those ways and allowed us to generate ourselves all kinds of interesting writings, which was more interesting and knowledgeable than his writing, and sometimes he seems to understand the comedy. Maybe we are being ungrateful by not avoiding to tread on his sore points, and to pretend his blogs are "geopolitical analysis" in return for his favor. His bloggers' persona seems to have many of those things which social outcast from school days, might think will be impressive for other people. So, he was pretending to be an "unsentimental tough guy", without seeming to know that adults view this negatively. Actually unsentimental cynical people, are pretending to be sentimental.He was also trying to boost his blogger persona ego by connecting his online life to country he has touristical kind of connection to, even while everyone of us is usually doing the opposite, and we all try to disconnect ourselves from government propaganda and official views. At a point a couple years past, his blog was almost Dada art, when he was posting his appearance as a Turkish taxi driver, while writing to people he is a Russian nationalist
- like the Clayton Bigsby joke (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BLNDqxrUUwQ.). A few people like Mr Hack seemed to understand the joke. Anon4/Bashibuzuk couldn't enjoy the joke and was triggered. But the tension with this Dada art, is that you are not quite sure if a person is really joking, and you are a bit scared to write anything about. When Aaronb is doing spiritualism writings, he sometimes ruins his joke by adding an emoji.Replies: @utu, @Thulean Friend, @Emil Nikola Richard
https://nypost.com/2021/03/10/milo-yiannopoulos-announces-he-is-ex-gay-and-sodomy-free/
Internet produces weirdness. What is the a priori world’s most famous queer right wing man announces he is now into women?
Maybe the resident website amateur psycho will opine on Karlin’s obvious repressed homosexuality.
You statement is an anti-Christian obscenity forged in Qom. You are either a Dhimmi slave, or you have been duped by practitioners of the Muslim Pillar of Taqiyya (Thou Must Lie To The Infidel).
If an Infidel works in Muslim plans then the Infidel is included. These types of situations can last a considerable period of time. Look at the cooperation between Saudi and the U.S.
However, the Infidel is never a “friend”. There is never “loyalty” to the expendable non-Muslim. According to Muhammad, deceiving & manipulating Infidels is encouraged as it makes them easier to kill.
You are lucky to be alive.
PEACE 😇
As if this or any other document would change Ukrainians attitudes at this point, knowing that their ethnocide is something real in their very hearts. I still don’t really get it though?…
Why would Putin want to decimate places like Mariupol into rubble, kill or chase away most of the inhabitants there too? The eastern parts of Ukraine have historically been the most russified to begin with. Even if he manages to take over these areas eventually, what has he accomplished except genocide over an existential threat that never really existed (Nazism)? Russia would need to rebuild and resettle these areas at a cost of trillions of dollars, that are nowhere to be seen for decades to come. Who in their right mind, Russian or Ukrainian, would want to live in places that are all bombed out like in Mariupol, dead ghost towns? And he might do the same thing in Kharkiv too. It’s thoughts like these that make me question whether Putler really is an intelligent person.
Maps, "abstract representations" - even the most complete - are just one way of engaging with reality, and a very limited one.
There is imagination, intuition, and direct sense contact and embodied engagement with reality.
That is why the mystics say that to see God, you have to dispense with maps altogether. They say you have to cease trying to "know" God through intellectual categories.
There is a great book from a 12th century English mystic called "The Cloud of Unknowing", in which he says God can never be reached through knowledge, but only through love.
Our most important experiences - love, art, poetry, beauty - can not be "known", but only hinted at, through abstract representations.
In terms of gaining more "knowledge", imagination and intuition comes into contact with some aspect of reality, and we then construct abstract representations in order to "hint" at what can never be fully captured in abstract intellectual categories.
But if you're trapped entirely in "mapland", as we moderns increasingly are, imagination and intuition cannot play it's role even in furthering "knowledge".
We have adopted Descartes belief that we must only have clear, distinct, and certain ideas - yet imagination and intuition, which is our primary direct contact with reality, produces indistinct and unclear ideas.
Keats said we need "negative capability" - the ability to sit with uncertainty and not rush to form conclusions and certainties.
We've lost that today, and can no longer listen to the imagination - so we are no longer creative.
Einstein, who relief on imagination to come up with his theories, said his great regret was that he didn't read the mystics when he was younger.Replies: @AaronB, @AaronB, @Mikel
To return to your question about “holistic” knowledge and maps –
So, the problem with maps – one of the problems – is that they have to be precise.
A very simple example –
Let’s take combat effectiveness. Things like morale, “esprit”, and motivation play an absolutely enormous role in combat performance.
Butt these things can’t be precisely defined or be measured – they are indistinct and unclear, yet vitally important, and can’t be clearly represented on a map, so they get increasingly ignored.
And you get people like Karlin eventually saying they don’t matter at all, and only number of men and tanks and planes etc matter.
Isn’t that the predicament of our civilization – that we’ve become “stupid” to the extent we insist on only what can be defined?
So to get a more “holistic” picture you would have to include things that can’t be represented on a map, cannot be precisely defined and measured.
And our modern civilization ignores that whole side of life, resulting in a delusionary view if reality.
-B- White Iranian Muslim?As a Christian, I want to live. Thus, " A" is obviously the correct answer. No matter how fair skinned, even Aryan, a Persian might appear -- the core value of Islam is killing Christians. Choosing "B" is suicidal.
___ HBD differences between groups exists. When dealing with large-scale issues like mass migration, that impact should be considered. However, on an individual level, having a stable 2-parent family & a traditional values church can help almost any kid become a good person.PEACE 😇Replies: @Wokechoke, @silviosilver, @Emil Nikola Richard, @songbird
Probability of that scenario is miniscule.
Bedroom test is a lot more likely. An Iranian Muslim woman can convert and pass. Impossible for black woman. Your own family has a good likelihood of Muslim sourced DNA sneaking around in there.
https://postlmg.cc/zbSHcBZp
Surkov is under house arrest (the ideologue of the Russian world). This "cleaning" is going very deep, to the very core.Replies: @sudden death, @Wokechoke
The Pentagon is adamant that there won’t be WWIII. Interestingly the DIA is happy to come out and debunk the Russian atrocities nonsense.
https://www.moonofalabama.org/2022/04/us-military-intelligence-official-refutes-russian-atrocities-claims.html
IMO, Western elites could have easily co-opted Putin, but they dropped the ball. Mostly, it was the failure to defuse Russia’s security concerns. (Merkel could have probably done this on her own, if she wasn’t an idiot) But I expect part of it was how there was impatience to turn Russia gay, and they were trying to force the curve.
But I don’t think Putin is pretending. His stress seems genuine.
The only way that Russia could have been co-opted is if it allowed itself to be a minor player remote-controlled by the US like all other EU countries. Given its huge size, and the inevitable resurgence that elevated oil prices afforded it during the 2000s, that was always a pipedream, IMO.
Putin probably trusted the West for too long, and was too reliant on Western tech (unlike the Chinese which started to aggressively replace/ban Western tech even when they had a per capita GDP lower than Albania). That's a mistake that he was openly admitting in his latest speech. Sent ska syndarna vakna.Replies: @songbird
-B- White Iranian Muslim?As a Christian, I want to live. Thus, " A" is obviously the correct answer. No matter how fair skinned, even Aryan, a Persian might appear -- the core value of Islam is killing Christians. Choosing "B" is suicidal.
___ HBD differences between groups exists. When dealing with large-scale issues like mass migration, that impact should be considered. However, on an individual level, having a stable 2-parent family & a traditional values church can help almost any kid become a good person.PEACE 😇Replies: @Wokechoke, @silviosilver, @Emil Nikola Richard, @songbird
You are in a foxhole. Who do you pick, the Shah or Clarence Thomas? (both in good health)
(He is more than 10% a kook but perhaps we can set that aside and consume his information signal content.)
https://www.amazon.com/Iranian-Leviathan-Monumental-History-Mithras/dp/1912975408Replies: @Yellowface Anon, @songbird
Can he be a few fox holes further forward instead? As Samuel Jackson would put it:
"The Shah is one bad a$$ MF. He just killed the F out everyone. That camel looked at him funny so he whacked it! I think it was *his* camel and he capped it anyway."
PEACE 😇
Jason Jorjani claims there is 10% or more Persians for whom heritage is innate and Islam is protective coloration.
(He is more than 10% a kook but perhaps we can set that aside and consume his information signal content.)
But I don't think Putin is pretending. His stress seems genuine.Replies: @Yellowface Anon, @Thulean Friend
If the analysis of the West exploiting Putin’s fears over Ukraine slipping away is true, as I said, they’re also using the war to start supply chain disruptions that ends in “green” transition (when gas is unaffordable) and bug-eating (when grain is unaffordable). Brandon might call for drilling to resume but those are the main narratives and goals to be achieved sooner or later. They’ll keep the sanctions up to lock in the loss.
I would have agreed with you more several years ago.
I think geography plays a role, but it’s also a case of left hemisphere capture.
And the problem with a culture that is tilted towards the left hemisphere is that it becomes paranoid and arrogant. Not seeing the larger picture leads to seeing threats everywhere and not being aware of your own limitations – a dangerous combination.
In this environment giving security assurances don’t work.
A similar dynamic played out in my own life.
My preferred method for dealing with the social pressure of left hemisphere types – i.e mainstream culture – was to pay lip service to their ideals and mouth the platitudes, while living my life my own way.
This worked well till around 2015 or thereabouts, where I began to notice a massive increase in the paranoia and arrogance of left hemisphere types, and that they were no longer satisfied with lip service but aggressively demanded total lifestyle and thought compliance in the most thoroughgoing way.
In hindsight, this probably was one of the downstream cultural results of the STEM “revolution” of 2010 around, where left hemisphere thinking finally displaced all other modes of thinking.
Interestingly, Ron Unz began his steep descent into paranoia and arrogance at around this time too – more and more people with innate left hemisphere biases, no longer had the cultural support systems that until then helped them balance that with right hemisphere thinking.
This is also around the time when the darkly schizophrenic (in the perfectly literal sense) character of Woke ideology became increasingly and disturbingly pronounced.
Unfortunately, we live in times when coming to reasonable accommodations don’t work so well anymore.
When you look at Russia, China, and our own Woke establishment, you see political systems that are supremely arrogant, supremely paranoid, and supremely delusional.
The watchword of our times is “control” – when left hemisphere types massively intensify their efforts to control everyone and squeeze out a healthy, balanced mode of thinking, there comes a point where you must resist, even if only internally.
The fight isn’t against Russia, China, or the individuals who composed our Woke establishment. Apparently Ron Unz suggested killing his political foes along with their families would lead to a solution – but this is typical over-literal left hemisphere thinking (not to mention cartoonishly evil in a way only a totally oblivious left hemisphere type wouldn’t see)
The fight is against a “mentality” which today afflicts the globe, and defeating any particular political system without re-balancing our mentality is utterly futile and itself a product of the mentality that must be defeated.
(He is more than 10% a kook but perhaps we can set that aside and consume his information signal content.)
https://www.amazon.com/Iranian-Leviathan-Monumental-History-Mithras/dp/1912975408Replies: @Yellowface Anon, @songbird
Does he approve of Velâyat-e Faqih?
But I don't think Putin is pretending. His stress seems genuine.Replies: @Yellowface Anon, @Thulean Friend
Hmm, I disagree. Even Yeltsin was anxious not to see NATO expand but was simply too weak (and drunk) to do much about it.
The only way that Russia could have been co-opted is if it allowed itself to be a minor player remote-controlled by the US like all other EU countries. Given its huge size, and the inevitable resurgence that elevated oil prices afforded it during the 2000s, that was always a pipedream, IMO.
Putin probably trusted the West for too long, and was too reliant on Western tech (unlike the Chinese which started to aggressively replace/ban Western tech even when they had a per capita GDP lower than Albania). That’s a mistake that he was openly admitting in his latest speech. Sent ska syndarna vakna.
Some people are saying that a lot of their past export-substitution is a con job, where people are paid to pretend their imports are Russian-made.
OTOH, I would think that today, it must be easier than ever to reverse-engineer anything that isn't nano. But, maybe, chips are key to everything now.
https://twitter.com/realGonzaloLira/status/1514194622968479751?cxt=HHwWjoC-7ZX_v4MqAAAA
MiniTrue at full power.Replies: @Thulean Friend, @Wokechoke
It’s amazing how many people on the left failed to understand that the censorship that began in ~2017 as a result of the Trump presidency would inevitably also touch them. In the West, it typically begins with the far-right but it never ends there. Sooner or later, anyone opposed the orthodox narratives of the centrist neoliberal establishment must be thrown under the bus. Lee Camp (a milquetoast leftist) got his entire podcast removed from Spotify.
This accelerating censorship is a sign of stress from the system. But it’s also an opportunity for alternative platforms (such as Telegram, where you can find RussiansWithAttitude and Scott Ritter these days). It will ensure that Unz Review will not only survive but thrive as the space for open discourse narrows elsewhere.
That is above the pay grade where he claims inside dope. He allocates many more pages on the various ideologies contending in 13th century wars. Skim it in a lot of spots but the book is well worth it on net.
Medvechuk tried to flee Ukraine dressed in a UA soldier uniform (ironic end to his political career… the Ukrainians will be able to get a lot of info about how this war was planned over the years).
Surkov is under house arrest (the ideologue of the Russian world). This “cleaning” is going very deep, to the very core.
One thing is certain: nobody who recently printed money because of covid lockdowns anticipated this disruption from Chinese lockdowns, or the fissure with Russia. I think they are very much groping their way through darkness, with their scientism failing them at every turn, including with "green energy", which I think is really the just an extension of the idea that we have mastered the earth and sun.Replies: @Yellowface Anon, @AaronB
On the level of instinct, I also don’t get the sense China is about to invade Taiwan.
But it’s hard to predict because the whole project operates on the level of myth, and China’s leaders are prone to delusion and arrogance – the vice of the technocratic mind.
I understand the impulse to find some “rational” reason for the Shanghai lockdowns, because they seem so crazy.
But this kind of self-defeating behavior which is blind to the human consequences of grand engineering “solutions” are unfortunately perfectly typical of cultures that become left hemisphere trapped.
Interestingly, simply on the level of “technique” it’s self defeating because lots of people are dying from preventable causes, denied care over Covid restrictions.
But once this kind of mentality zeroes in on a “goal”, it pursues it relentlessly without the ability to notice the self-defeating consequences on a “wider” level of reality.
Obviously, our own culture is trapped in a similar dynamic.
Take the censorship Thulean Friend alludes to above –
Simply on the level of “technique”, it’s self-defeating, because it doesn’t actually keep people from finding out suppressed content.
So all it accomplishes is massively undermine confidence in mainstream media – a goal diametrically opposite to the attempt to “shape the information landscape”.
But notice – the “undermining” takes place on a higher, wider level of reality than the original goal. So to see that, you’d have to be able to “zoom out”.
But the technocratic mentality operates primarily on the level of fine detail, so unless it’s balanced by another mode of thinking it literally cannot “zoom out”.
And the more ones education is almost entirely in STEM, the more the ability to zoom out simply atrophies.
Absolutely correct.
Notice, no one talks about limiting our energy consumption anymore, as part of rebalancing with nature and returning to a wider frame from which to view reality.
No, it’s merely more technocratic solutions while leaving our fundamental behavior untouched, even more delusional this time.
The so called environmental movement has been hijacked by the left hemisphere types as much as anyone.
Briefly, on the Shanghai lockdowns, I caught a minute of National Pravda Radio (NPR) and they were tut-tutting and head shaking about how China was "trying to outwit nature with their Covid zero policies." That had me laughing since they were the morons a few months ago who couldn't stop eating that stuff up. People must really have no memory. In one ear and out the other. Whoosh!
Surkov is under house arrest (the ideologue of the Russian world). This "cleaning" is going very deep, to the very core.Replies: @sudden death, @Wokechoke
Can’t agree atm regards deep core cleaning as nobody from current RF Security Council is touched yet anyhow.
Surkov himself is just retired (not acting for several years) executive clerck even if at high level, so his influence atm is overrated, he might be contained just in case of preventing him running away and leaking some juicy details regarding 2013-2015 period.
Since you’ve brought up Surkov, you wouldn’t happen to know what’s become of Hryhoriy Suirkis, Ukrainian businessman and football magnate, “KGB officer” etc, since all hell has broken loose in Ukraine? You seem to have an interest and a good handle on security service people and issues.
Right, not the ones in the current operational roles. Surkov was more of a Russian world ideologue (his overly complex formulations were probably too much for some of these more operational guys anyway). It looks like they dumped a lot money in their project, since he’s now charged with embezzlement in large amounts. Frankly, I don’t think that “national loyalty” is something that can be bought so easily so that project might have been futile to begin with.
Remember hearing that he allegedly was trying to get out with large sum of money and was detained with his SUV at the UA border, but was not following further was it real/whether he was released or not.
Being *in* the foxhole with the Shah is waaaaay too scary.
Can he be a few fox holes further forward instead? As Samuel Jackson would put it:
“The Shah is one bad a$$ MF. He just killed the F out everyone. That camel looked at him funny so he whacked it! I think it was *his* camel and he capped it anyway.”
PEACE 😇
But it's hard to predict because the whole project operates on the level of myth, and China's leaders are prone to delusion and arrogance - the vice of the technocratic mind.
I understand the impulse to find some "rational" reason for the Shanghai lockdowns, because they seem so crazy.
But this kind of self-defeating behavior which is blind to the human consequences of grand engineering "solutions" are unfortunately perfectly typical of cultures that become left hemisphere trapped.
Interestingly, simply on the level of "technique" it's self defeating because lots of people are dying from preventable causes, denied care over Covid restrictions.
But once this kind of mentality zeroes in on a "goal", it pursues it relentlessly without the ability to notice the self-defeating consequences on a "wider" level of reality.
Obviously, our own culture is trapped in a similar dynamic.
Take the censorship Thulean Friend alludes to above -
Simply on the level of "technique", it's self-defeating, because it doesn't actually keep people from finding out suppressed content.
So all it accomplishes is massively undermine confidence in mainstream media - a goal diametrically opposite to the attempt to "shape the information landscape".
But notice - the "undermining" takes place on a higher, wider level of reality than the original goal. So to see that, you'd have to be able to "zoom out".
But the technocratic mentality operates primarily on the level of fine detail, so unless it's balanced by another mode of thinking it literally cannot "zoom out".
And the more ones education is almost entirely in STEM, the more the ability to zoom out simply atrophies. Absolutely correct.
Notice, no one talks about limiting our energy consumption anymore, as part of rebalancing with nature and returning to a wider frame from which to view reality.
No, it's merely more technocratic solutions while leaving our fundamental behavior untouched, even more delusional this time.
The so called environmental movement has been hijacked by the left hemisphere types as much as anyone.Replies: @songbird, @Barbarossa
I think part of the reason that Putin underestimated Ukraine and thought that it would fold quickly was that he was too misled by GDP, which today is seen as the ultimate measure of power, by economic reductionists.
As for Ukraine, it's too early to say. The World Bank now says Ukraine's economy will collapse by a cataclysmic -45% this year. The finance minister of Ukraine openly says that his country needs massive debt writeoffs.
Something I've said from the beginning is that Ukraine will pay a much greater economic price and the West's true intentions will be judged by how much they will help them. I am not optimistic on their generosity, because my view is that Western capitals only view Ukrainians as expendable pawns to hurt Russia.Replies: @songbird
How would the Romans interpret a bird crapping on the emperor, when he was blaming the Sassanids for inflation?
(He is more than 10% a kook but perhaps we can set that aside and consume his information signal content.)
https://www.amazon.com/Iranian-Leviathan-Monumental-History-Mithras/dp/1912975408Replies: @Yellowface Anon, @songbird
What percentage of Iranians look like Freddy Mercury? I can never get a good read on it.
Many of the various ethnicities in that world sector would be happy to tell you (and Jorjani is one of them) that their home city is within 40 miles of the authentic original proto indo europeans site from 10 000 years ago when they spread out to conquer and plunder and propagate all important cultures from Norway to Kashmir.Replies: @Yahya, @Wokechoke
Now that have “sunk” the Moskva cruiser. LOL
https://twitter.com/NuestraIraSLG/status/1514327259649351682
The only way that Russia could have been co-opted is if it allowed itself to be a minor player remote-controlled by the US like all other EU countries. Given its huge size, and the inevitable resurgence that elevated oil prices afforded it during the 2000s, that was always a pipedream, IMO.
Putin probably trusted the West for too long, and was too reliant on Western tech (unlike the Chinese which started to aggressively replace/ban Western tech even when they had a per capita GDP lower than Albania). That's a mistake that he was openly admitting in his latest speech. Sent ska syndarna vakna.Replies: @songbird
It will be interesting to see how they adjust.
Some people are saying that a lot of their past export-substitution is a con job, where people are paid to pretend their imports are Russian-made.
OTOH, I would think that today, it must be easier than ever to reverse-engineer anything that isn’t nano. But, maybe, chips are key to everything now.
Surkov is under house arrest (the ideologue of the Russian world). This "cleaning" is going very deep, to the very core.Replies: @sudden death, @Wokechoke
The Russians are going to kill at least 600,000 Ukies. Why are they so hell bent on self destructive provocations of the Russians?
In California they are selected for upper class and Iranian girls are as hot as they come on the spectrum. I haven’t dated a sufficient number to get any data on the hot crazy axis variable. I presume they are roughly the same to first approximation.
Many of the various ethnicities in that world sector would be happy to tell you (and Jorjani is one of them) that their home city is within 40 miles of the authentic original proto indo europeans site from 10 000 years ago when they spread out to conquer and plunder and propagate all important cultures from Norway to Kashmir.
With Islamo-Iranian Sarah Shahi:https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BODU3OTY5ZDUtM2MwOS00NDQzLTkxNDEtZjBmNjZmN2Y2OWYxXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMTEzOTQwNDk1._V1_.jpgRe, Iranian phenotypes: my observation is that Iranian phenotypes are like every other Middle Eastern phenotypic profile. They range from lighter Mediterranean types to darker Arabian types, with most somewhere in between. Iranians in general tend to be lighter than Arabs in Iraq, Egypt, and Arabia; roughly the same as Maghrebis, but darker than Turks and Levantines (though there is considerable overlap such that it's possible to find many instances of an Egyptian who is lighter than an Iranian, and a Turk who is darker than an Iranian etc.)Light Iranian (Leila Hatami):https://thumbs.dreamstime.com/b/leila-hatami-attends-pig-leila-hatami-attends-pig-khook-press-conference-th-berlinale-international-film-120990297.jpg
Tanned Iranian (Princess Noor):https://ar.vogue.me/image_provider/?w=750&h=&zc=1&q=90&cc=ffffff&src=https://en.vogue.me/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Webp.net-resizeimage-56.jpg
Dark Iranian (Golshifteh Farahani):https://www.middle-east-online.com/sites/default/files/styles/home_special_coverage_1920xauto/public/2019-12/Golshifteh%20Farahani%20.jpg?itok=G08mlzF0One of my college professors was a dark Iranian-American lady who shared the same phenotype as Farahani. It took me months to figure out she was Iranian, not Pakistani. On the other hand, another Iranian I knew could've been mistaken for any number of Mediterranean nationalities. Both were from the same ethnic (and likely, genetic) background, yet visually may as well have been from separate continents. This phenomenon is quite common in the Middle East. Some of the variation in Iran is likely caused by the ethnic and genetic heterogeneity of the population. https://cdn.technologynetworks.com/tn/images/body/irangeneticvariation1569487071775.jpgIranian Baluchis and Sistanis tend to look like Afghans/Pakistanis, Iranian Turkmen like Central Asians, and the rest of Iran's ethnic groups (Arabs, Azeris, Kurds etc.) tend to look Middle Eastern. But intra-ethnic phenotypic variation among Persians requires another, less straightforward explanation. My amateur hypothesis is that the ancient mixing between two distant population groups during the Bronze Age, which in Iran would be Indo-European steppe pastoralists and neolithic Iranian farmers, is the cause of phenotypic variation among Persians. Though as interesting as this topic is to me, no researcher has attempted to link genotypic variation to phenotypic variation. Zohreh Mehrjoo et al. revealed three years ago that the IE steppe component found in Iranians was introduced during the Bronze Age, and mixed into an Iran_Neolithic population closely related to PG Islanders: In other words, Iran is not the original spring source of the Aryans, rather Aryans migrated into Iran as they did Europe and India.Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
Only by the contemporary definition of “far right,” which is anything even an inch to the right of mainstream cuckservatism. That’s the only standard by which people Trump or Karlin could be portrayed as “far right.” Otherwise they have zero connection to anything traditionally far right. Interesting that even on a site like this, where virtually no one cares about the tag, you still find it necessary to attempt to tar by association. Not exactly the approach of someone confident in the viability of his political values.
And of course Karlin’s aversion to blacks (or whatever) is simply the aversion that any normal person would have to being surrounded by too many people are who too different to himself. Where people draw the line of “too much” differs from person to person, but only the most faggot-made personas are surprised by the phenomenon.
How do you know those flags belong to immigrant households? A more plausible hypothesis is that they belong to ethnic Swedes who, upon feeling swamped by too many outsiders, discover that they actually do care about being Swedish – an experience that middle class Swedes, tucked away in their relative whitopias, haven’t yet gone through.
The Russians have come to chase away and resettle. Make no mistake.
https://twitter.com/realGonzaloLira/status/1514194622968479751?cxt=HHwWjoC-7ZX_v4MqAAAA
MiniTrue at full power.Replies: @Thulean Friend, @Wokechoke
That sounds why it isn’t good to point out the L’s to losers like Laxa
However, the Infidel is never a "friend". There is never "loyalty" to the expendable non-Muslim. According to Muhammad, deceiving & manipulating Infidels is encouraged as it makes them easier to kill.
You are lucky to be alive.
PEACE 😇Replies: @silviosilver
I guess you’re right. I’d have been much safer strolling through niggertown.
Randomly walking up and targeting other races, notably Asians, is a fairly new phenomenon. It is something that should be squashed by proper law enforcement.
Of course, George IslamoSoros has been funding weak Islamophile DA'S as part of his campaign for SJW Muslim values. Creating internal strife is a way of weakening Infidel countries, such as the U.S.
PEACE 😇
PEACE 😇
_________
(1) From 2021 -- https://genzconservative.com/no-go-zones-in-france/
(2) From 2020 -- https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/15977/france-no-go-zones-riots
I believe this map is from 2015. The situation has gotten considerably worse since then.
https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-VEa85DnWjLg/XcBym9Y4pKI/AAAAAAABOjc/tqt6XppS2ssvOTcACt9UTYrceR8XNiXywCLcBGAsYHQ/s1600/France%2Bno-go%2Bzones.jpg
Go at it! Any idea when? Where are the funds going to come from to rebuild Mariupol and other parts of Donbas? Looks like quite an ambitions program. I wouldn’t want to be one of the first Russian pioneers to put down roots there. How about you?

Who in Russia (or from anywhere), in his right mind, would want to come and settle in Mariupol? Perhaps, Wokechoke?
Interesting to see how Putler has treated Russian speakers in Donbas, once friendly to Russia, but certainly not anymore.
You still don’t get it or just pretend not to get it, but what’s the reason – too small of a heart or too thick of a skull?
Finland lost roughly 1,7 % of its all 1939 population while fighting USSR during 39-44 in order to ensure survival of a country, so such possible comparable casualties (600k) are being understood very well in Ukraine, but survival of a country is still worth it in the bitter end.
I stated that the Russians would accept mass casualties to retain Crimea. As high as 250,000 of their own soldiers to keep it. They won’t even blink before 100,000. The Ukrainians will end up losing 600,000 men at this rate.
I’ve seen these wars before, I know how they have gone historically. For example when the Crimean Khanate raided into Russia every year for 45 years they dragged off 20,000-50,000 Russians, penetrated to Moscow with Janissaries, at a time to sell as slaves in Egypt, Turkey, Morocco.
I do not I understand wtf the Ukrainians are thinking if they think they get Crimea back given the vulnerability that provides Moscow. Using Turkish gear with names like the Bayraktar is a huge symbolic error too. You can’t get this stuff through the skulls of FO or State officials.Replies: @sudden death
I doubt anybody here cares much, except perhaps for fellow hiker Aaron, but the other day I completed my first medium-distance hike in a sand dune field (~6 miles).

It was quite a new experience, used as I am since childhood to enjoy nature by hiking to some mountain summit, but very enjoyable. The day was windy so the sky was dusty and not as blue as usual in these latitudes. There was also a possibility of the winds strengthening and turning into a sand storm but fortunately it didn’t happen while I was there.
Once I got to the summit of the first sand dune I chose a small promontory in the distance across the dunes as my destination and started walking towards it. First, I just tried to maintain a fixed walking direction towards that point (west). This meant walking up and down the dunes non-stop, which turned out to be a very good calf exercise, judging by my sore muscles the next day, but not very practical. I soon discovered that trying to stay on the ridge of the dunes and concatenating one ridge after the other was a better strategy. The ups and downs were not as steep and the promontory was visible for longer. But there was a limit to this strategy. Sometimes, the dune ridges just deviated too much from the desired direction or became too vertical so it was better to walk back to the bottom and try to negotiate the dunes until a new line of ridges appeared to head west. All in all, it was a great orientation exercise that kept me much more alert of my surroundings than if I was just following a trail.
This is a relatively small sand dune field with an area of about 60,000 acres. Nothing to do with the big sand dune territories of the Southwest. But still, when you are in the middle of it, with nothing but sand mountains surrounding you in all directions, it feels immense. A great place for a spiritual or psychedelic experience.
Little by little I began to approach the end of the sand dunes but my promontory didn’t appear to be much closer than at the beginning so I chose a secondary one as my final destination before turning back. The sand began to give way to some fantastic black rock formations, impassible at the same locations that they must have been for many thousands of years, and beautiful junipers here and there, barely managing to find nutrients in the poor soil but giving the landscape a more welcoming touch.

The way back was somewhat easier. At the beginning the wind had not still had the time to erase my footprints so I just had to follow them. Then, having already spent a couple of hours walking in the dunes, I somehow felt like I had gotten a hold of how to instinctively find my way and just let myself go without thinking too much. This also happens in the mountains. There is a point when you feel like you are just a part of the environment around you and you get all relaxed while you walk. I guess the endorphins released by the exercise play a part in this. But this is also a moment when you don’t want to relax too much. Your thoughts start to wander away from what you’re doing and not infrequently I’ve lost my way at this stage of my hikes, having to bushwhack back to the trail. A couple of times it’s actually been worse than just bushwhacking, like having to spend the night in the open and getting my wife all alarmed.
I’m definitely going to repeat this experience. I realize that I’m very far away from having the sand dune navigating skills that the Tuareg or the Paiute Indians must have mastered but who cares? Everything comes with practice and that’s not the point anyway. In fact, I don’t know what the point is. But I felt great when I was back home after my new little adventure.
Did you look for or observe any unusual aircraft?
I am shooting for 1 May myself. This being year of tiger I really want to see a mountain lion (with no small mountain lion companions.)Replies: @Mikel
Your diversionary tactic is oh so obvious in how it doesn’t address any of his Russia-Ukraine related observations.
Maps, "abstract representations" - even the most complete - are just one way of engaging with reality, and a very limited one.
There is imagination, intuition, and direct sense contact and embodied engagement with reality.
That is why the mystics say that to see God, you have to dispense with maps altogether. They say you have to cease trying to "know" God through intellectual categories.
There is a great book from a 12th century English mystic called "The Cloud of Unknowing", in which he says God can never be reached through knowledge, but only through love.
Our most important experiences - love, art, poetry, beauty - can not be "known", but only hinted at, through abstract representations.
In terms of gaining more "knowledge", imagination and intuition comes into contact with some aspect of reality, and we then construct abstract representations in order to "hint" at what can never be fully captured in abstract intellectual categories.
But if you're trapped entirely in "mapland", as we moderns increasingly are, imagination and intuition cannot play it's role even in furthering "knowledge".
We have adopted Descartes belief that we must only have clear, distinct, and certain ideas - yet imagination and intuition, which is our primary direct contact with reality, produces indistinct and unclear ideas.
Keats said we need "negative capability" - the ability to sit with uncertainty and not rush to form conclusions and certainties.
We've lost that today, and can no longer listen to the imagination - so we are no longer creative.
Einstein, who relief on imagination to come up with his theories, said his great regret was that he didn't read the mystics when he was younger.Replies: @AaronB, @AaronB, @Mikel
That’s an interesting discussion you are having with Silviosilver.
Straight lines are a geometrical concept and geometry is a part of mathematics. But nobody knows what mathematics is. Is it just a product of our mind or does mathematics have its own independent existence that humans are just discovering and understanding? If so, how were mathematics created? Where do they come from? Even though they have proven to be a very useful tool for us to understand the natural world, most of mathematics have no practical use whatsoever but still they appear to “hold true”. This is one of the most fascinating debates in my view. One of the very few where philosophers can still offer some gain in knowledge, provided they are also well trained in mathematics.
I guess it can be can argued that, even if math is just a product of the human mind, as some great scientists think, its concepts, such as a straight line, are also part of nature since they are the output of a mammal brain: an organ of a natural species like any other.
Many of the various ethnicities in that world sector would be happy to tell you (and Jorjani is one of them) that their home city is within 40 miles of the authentic original proto indo europeans site from 10 000 years ago when they spread out to conquer and plunder and propagate all important cultures from Norway to Kashmir.Replies: @Yahya, @Wokechoke
Iranian-Americans girls have the double advantage of being selected from the upper caste of their society and of being more liberal in their clothing. Don’t underestimate the de-beautifying effect a hijab has on a Muslim woman.
Compare Iranian-Americano Sarah Shahi:

With Islamo-Iranian Sarah Shahi:

Re, Iranian phenotypes: my observation is that Iranian phenotypes are like every other Middle Eastern phenotypic profile. They range from lighter Mediterranean types to darker Arabian types, with most somewhere in between. Iranians in general tend to be lighter than Arabs in Iraq, Egypt, and Arabia; roughly the same as Maghrebis, but darker than Turks and Levantines (though there is considerable overlap such that it’s possible to find many instances of an Egyptian who is lighter than an Iranian, and a Turk who is darker than an Iranian etc.)
Light Iranian (Leila Hatami):

Tanned Iranian (Princess Noor):

Dark Iranian (Golshifteh Farahani):


One of my college professors was a dark Iranian-American lady who shared the same phenotype as Farahani. It took me months to figure out she was Iranian, not Pakistani. On the other hand, another Iranian I knew could’ve been mistaken for any number of Mediterranean nationalities. Both were from the same ethnic (and likely, genetic) background, yet visually may as well have been from separate continents. This phenomenon is quite common in the Middle East. Some of the variation in Iran is likely caused by the ethnic and genetic heterogeneity of the population.
Iranian Baluchis and Sistanis tend to look like Afghans/Pakistanis, Iranian Turkmen like Central Asians, and the rest of Iran’s ethnic groups (Arabs, Azeris, Kurds etc.) tend to look Middle Eastern.
But intra-ethnic phenotypic variation among Persians requires another, less straightforward explanation. My amateur hypothesis is that the ancient mixing between two distant population groups during the Bronze Age, which in Iran would be Indo-European steppe pastoralists and neolithic Iranian farmers, is the cause of phenotypic variation among Persians. Though as interesting as this topic is to me, no researcher has attempted to link genotypic variation to phenotypic variation. Zohreh Mehrjoo et al. revealed three years ago that the IE steppe component found in Iranians was introduced during the Bronze Age, and mixed into an Iran_Neolithic population closely related to PG Islanders:
In other words, Iran is not the original spring source of the Aryans, rather Aryans migrated into Iran as they did Europe and India.
https://twitter.com/NuestraIraSLG/status/1514327259649351682Replies: @sudden death
LOL indeed as demilitarization of RF forces is proceeding succesfully on UA waters too when flagman ship of RF Black sea fleet named “Moscow” has been blown up and sunk completely…Soon all official RF sources will be updated with such type of messaging:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FQQp26lXEAE0v9f?format=jpg&name=small
Actual pic of preblown view:

https://tass.ru/proisshestviya/14372453
Ammunition explosion.
Either Ukraine is taking credit for what they didn't do or Russia is covering up a successful Ukrainian attack. Either way a loss for Russia.
What don’t I get again?
I stated that the Russians would accept mass casualties to retain Crimea. As high as 250,000 of their own soldiers to keep it. They won’t even blink before 100,000. The Ukrainians will end up losing 600,000 men at this rate.
I’ve seen these wars before, I know how they have gone historically. For example when the Crimean Khanate raided into Russia every year for 45 years they dragged off 20,000-50,000 Russians, penetrated to Moscow with Janissaries, at a time to sell as slaves in Egypt, Turkey, Morocco.
I do not I understand wtf the Ukrainians are thinking if they think they get Crimea back given the vulnerability that provides Moscow. Using Turkish gear with names like the Bayraktar is a huge symbolic error too. You can’t get this stuff through the skulls of FO or State officials.
https://ria.ru/20220414/kreyser-1783435471.html
Ammunition explosion.
Either Ukraine is taking credit for what they didn’t do or Russia is covering up a successful Ukrainian attack. Either way a loss for Russia.
Out of cell range?
Did you look for or observe any unusual aircraft?
I am shooting for 1 May myself. This being year of tiger I really want to see a mountain lion (with no small mountain lion companions.)
It’s easy enough to rebuild industrial facilities. The Russians will colonise this place.
Wokechoke reviewing where he plans to build his new home in Mariupol?Replies: @Wokechoke
Many of the various ethnicities in that world sector would be happy to tell you (and Jorjani is one of them) that their home city is within 40 miles of the authentic original proto indo europeans site from 10 000 years ago when they spread out to conquer and plunder and propagate all important cultures from Norway to Kashmir.Replies: @Yahya, @Wokechoke
A nice looking Iranian girl with green eyes is quite the look. It’s common enough to be a thing.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/04/07/russia-ukraine-united-nations-zelensky-right/
We should actually give the seat to Georgia – Stalin was a Georgian and Georgia has as much right as Ukraine to claim its government as the legitimate successor of the USSR. (They will do the American bidding anyway.)
With Islamo-Iranian Sarah Shahi:https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BODU3OTY5ZDUtM2MwOS00NDQzLTkxNDEtZjBmNjZmN2Y2OWYxXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMTEzOTQwNDk1._V1_.jpgRe, Iranian phenotypes: my observation is that Iranian phenotypes are like every other Middle Eastern phenotypic profile. They range from lighter Mediterranean types to darker Arabian types, with most somewhere in between. Iranians in general tend to be lighter than Arabs in Iraq, Egypt, and Arabia; roughly the same as Maghrebis, but darker than Turks and Levantines (though there is considerable overlap such that it's possible to find many instances of an Egyptian who is lighter than an Iranian, and a Turk who is darker than an Iranian etc.)Light Iranian (Leila Hatami):https://thumbs.dreamstime.com/b/leila-hatami-attends-pig-leila-hatami-attends-pig-khook-press-conference-th-berlinale-international-film-120990297.jpg
Tanned Iranian (Princess Noor):https://ar.vogue.me/image_provider/?w=750&h=&zc=1&q=90&cc=ffffff&src=https://en.vogue.me/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Webp.net-resizeimage-56.jpg
Dark Iranian (Golshifteh Farahani):https://www.middle-east-online.com/sites/default/files/styles/home_special_coverage_1920xauto/public/2019-12/Golshifteh%20Farahani%20.jpg?itok=G08mlzF0One of my college professors was a dark Iranian-American lady who shared the same phenotype as Farahani. It took me months to figure out she was Iranian, not Pakistani. On the other hand, another Iranian I knew could've been mistaken for any number of Mediterranean nationalities. Both were from the same ethnic (and likely, genetic) background, yet visually may as well have been from separate continents. This phenomenon is quite common in the Middle East. Some of the variation in Iran is likely caused by the ethnic and genetic heterogeneity of the population. https://cdn.technologynetworks.com/tn/images/body/irangeneticvariation1569487071775.jpgIranian Baluchis and Sistanis tend to look like Afghans/Pakistanis, Iranian Turkmen like Central Asians, and the rest of Iran's ethnic groups (Arabs, Azeris, Kurds etc.) tend to look Middle Eastern. But intra-ethnic phenotypic variation among Persians requires another, less straightforward explanation. My amateur hypothesis is that the ancient mixing between two distant population groups during the Bronze Age, which in Iran would be Indo-European steppe pastoralists and neolithic Iranian farmers, is the cause of phenotypic variation among Persians. Though as interesting as this topic is to me, no researcher has attempted to link genotypic variation to phenotypic variation. Zohreh Mehrjoo et al. revealed three years ago that the IE steppe component found in Iranians was introduced during the Bronze Age, and mixed into an Iran_Neolithic population closely related to PG Islanders: In other words, Iran is not the original spring source of the Aryans, rather Aryans migrated into Iran as they did Europe and India.Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
It has been awhile since I read the book but as I recall JJ puts the Garden of Eden (my term–he doesn’t call it that) at the first tourist archeaology site southeast of Rasht on the road to Tehran. The furthest north claim was from a Kazakstan friend I knew in grad school. I don’t know JJ but the other fellow was 100.0% serious.
https://styles.redditmedia.com/t5_2ws4n/styles/image_widget_is6coc4xem041.jpg?format=pjpg&s=e516d9dc2e681eb7d7044279ead34a3e4056a0a4
Nor did the source populations of Indo-Europeans come from the eastern steppes. Well, there is some truth to his claims (though i'm skeptical of precise co-ordinates). But ultimately the Indo-Aryans were a mixed-origin people. Genetic studies indicate Yamnaya pastoralists were roughly 50% derived of eastern hunter-gatherers from the steppes of Ukraine/Russia, and 50% derived from Iranian farmers. The latter component was introduced into a base population of EHGs roughly 5,000-7,000 years ago. The Iranian farmers are most closely related to present-day Mingrelians, from the backwoods of Georgia. Also Armenians and Iranians to a lesser extent.This leads some to speculate that Iranian farmer originated somewhere in the Caucasus, rather than Iran proper. But David Reich reassures that they came from further south in Iran. Either way, Iranian farmers only comprised half of Indo-European ancestry, the rest being indigenous hunter-gatherers from the Pontic Steppe. So there is no single definitive Garden Of Eden.Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @S
As recently as 10 years ago, you definitely would have been safer. Street dealers need customers. The gangs made sure buyers could get in & get out. The bulk of the violence was gang vs. gang.
Randomly walking up and targeting other races, notably Asians, is a fairly new phenomenon. It is something that should be squashed by proper law enforcement.
Of course, George IslamoSoros has been funding weak Islamophile DA’S as part of his campaign for SJW Muslim values. Creating internal strife is a way of weakening Infidel countries, such as the U.S.
PEACE 😇
Wonder whether what pushed the Brooklyn subway shooter over the edge was talk about blacks being mistreated in Ukraine. It is a bit subtle – but he mentioned how Zelenksy had Ukrainians’ backs, but there was nobody to protect the backs of blacks. And, maybe, all the talk of genocide was another component?
Obviously, the guy was mental and a pyschopath, but I can’t help but feel that it was the modern American system that pushed him over.
I’ve long felt that there is at least a small percentage of blacks that are just driven crazy by the way the media constantly amplifies the idea of racism, and that whites are evil.
It’s super politically incorrect to state what strikes me as obvious: this guy may have been a bit saner in Africa, and, maybe, the US should provide a pathway for people like him to move there – people who would benefit from being removed from this toxic multicult environment.
With their declining population?
Did you look for or observe any unusual aircraft?
I am shooting for 1 May myself. This being year of tiger I really want to see a mountain lion (with no small mountain lion companions.)Replies: @Mikel
Yes but I use crappy Tracfone. I did have a GPS and a compass but didn’t use them. I’m an old-school hiker and I’m still learning to navigate properly with GPS.
Not at all. I just remember the usual contrails in the sky.
You’re dreaming or doing crack. Estimates today are that it would cost a minimum of 10 billion to rebuild Mariupol. Russia is just starting its descent into a long, long period of time of economic stagnation, with no end in sight. Smart young people are leaving Russia in droves. Even the energy sector that has really been Russia’s main source of income is being curtailed. Russia will become one big black hole and it hasn’t even won in Mariupol yet. It doesn’t add up for you and all of your other sorry kremlin stooge friends. BTW, what ethnicity are you and where do you live? You never answered my question whether you’ll be one of the first to move to Mariupol or even somewhere else in Donbas and be a part of the new “colonizers”? Only the lowest strata of Russian filth would ever consider moving to Donbas, now or into the future. Have at it “tovarishch”. 🙁
Wokechoke reviewing where he plans to build his new home in Mariupol?
I stated that the Russians would accept mass casualties to retain Crimea. As high as 250,000 of their own soldiers to keep it. They won’t even blink before 100,000. The Ukrainians will end up losing 600,000 men at this rate.
I’ve seen these wars before, I know how they have gone historically. For example when the Crimean Khanate raided into Russia every year for 45 years they dragged off 20,000-50,000 Russians, penetrated to Moscow with Janissaries, at a time to sell as slaves in Egypt, Turkey, Morocco.
I do not I understand wtf the Ukrainians are thinking if they think they get Crimea back given the vulnerability that provides Moscow. Using Turkish gear with names like the Bayraktar is a huge symbolic error too. You can’t get this stuff through the skulls of FO or State officials.Replies: @sudden death
In case you have missed it for some reason, it might be shocking news, but fighting has been absent in Crimean peninsula even now and all the time since RF grabbed it 😉
Excellent point. Russia’s projected population decline doesn’t at all fair well for a new colonization effort within the projected New Russia in Ukraine. Low on funds, low on “colonizers” and mostly low on brains…Only Karlin could be able to explain how this all will work out to the benefit of Russia, and he’s not talking anymore. 🙂
But it's hard to predict because the whole project operates on the level of myth, and China's leaders are prone to delusion and arrogance - the vice of the technocratic mind.
I understand the impulse to find some "rational" reason for the Shanghai lockdowns, because they seem so crazy.
But this kind of self-defeating behavior which is blind to the human consequences of grand engineering "solutions" are unfortunately perfectly typical of cultures that become left hemisphere trapped.
Interestingly, simply on the level of "technique" it's self defeating because lots of people are dying from preventable causes, denied care over Covid restrictions.
But once this kind of mentality zeroes in on a "goal", it pursues it relentlessly without the ability to notice the self-defeating consequences on a "wider" level of reality.
Obviously, our own culture is trapped in a similar dynamic.
Take the censorship Thulean Friend alludes to above -
Simply on the level of "technique", it's self-defeating, because it doesn't actually keep people from finding out suppressed content.
So all it accomplishes is massively undermine confidence in mainstream media - a goal diametrically opposite to the attempt to "shape the information landscape".
But notice - the "undermining" takes place on a higher, wider level of reality than the original goal. So to see that, you'd have to be able to "zoom out".
But the technocratic mentality operates primarily on the level of fine detail, so unless it's balanced by another mode of thinking it literally cannot "zoom out".
And the more ones education is almost entirely in STEM, the more the ability to zoom out simply atrophies. Absolutely correct.
Notice, no one talks about limiting our energy consumption anymore, as part of rebalancing with nature and returning to a wider frame from which to view reality.
No, it's merely more technocratic solutions while leaving our fundamental behavior untouched, even more delusional this time.
The so called environmental movement has been hijacked by the left hemisphere types as much as anyone.Replies: @songbird, @Barbarossa
I agree fully on the environmental movement. Pencil me in as someone concerned about the sustainablity of human resource exploitation, but most of the “green” policy moves just seem like LARPing.
Briefly, on the Shanghai lockdowns, I caught a minute of National Pravda Radio (NPR) and they were tut-tutting and head shaking about how China was “trying to outwit nature with their Covid zero policies.” That had me laughing since they were the morons a few months ago who couldn’t stop eating that stuff up. People must really have no memory. In one ear and out the other. Whoosh!
Mikel, nice to see you back so soon, your self-imposed exile being as brief as GR’s. (Cup your ear and you make out the echoes of utu snarling cartoon-like, “Curses, foiled again!”)
You ever hike through thicketed forest? The idea intrigues me but frankly I’m too chicken to venture that far off the beaten track. I’ve even panicked hard following hiking trails up a mountainside and on the way back forgetting which direction I had gone when the paths split a few times. The sun was going to set in an hour or so and then good luck seeing anything, but fortunately I guessed right and was greeted by the welcome sight of my automobile.
Since you’re here, perhaps you might contribute some of your native knowledge to settling a point of contention between myself and Yahya (most recently sighted upholding the phenotypic honor of Iranians, as duty compels him): is it true that, in Spain, now or in the past, Spaniards are in the habit of refusing to address people they deem “too dark” in Spanish?
Also, regarding straight lines, I think I’d be willing to concede Aaron’s point about them not existing “in nature,” provided that is defined as objects that exist externally to the mind, excluding objects that are the physical product of the mind (such as a printed straight line on a piece of paper).
I would say that the propensity to use one language or another with strangers is similar in Spain-proper to any other country. If you look darker or lighter than the typical Spaniard (who has a rather wide variety of skin tones) the main influence in how people will address you is their own ability to speak another language, which used to be very poor in Spain.
Now, if we're talking about friendliness to foreigners in Spain, there are some curious dynamics at play. Spaniards are more friendly than the average in Europe but people in Madrid and especially in Andalusia are more likely to be hostile to non-Europeans. I've witnessed this with my own eyes. Madrid has a long history of receiving economic migrants from all regions, especially from LATAM and MENA, and have developed their own animosities, including the invention of some ethnic slurs that later spread to other regions of Spain and even to LATAM itself, like sudacas (now being replaced by panchitos) or negratas.
Why Andalusians, arguably the least European region in mainland Spain, have sometimes hostile attitudes to third worlders that were unimaginable at the time in other parts of Spain I have no idea.
In the Basque Country we can be as racist as anyone but, for historical and folkloric reasons, we have always focused our racism on Spaniards, although this is in decline now. Other kind of foreigners are unlikely to experience any rejection, although we are not as extroverted as further south. In fact, non-Europeans would probably find that the Basque Country is quite a welcoming place, apart from the difficult language barrier. I think that this has a lot to do with Basque nationalism having developed strong ties with leftist anti-imperialist movements during the 60s that still linger on. However, I hear that people are getting tired of young Maghrebis committing a very disproportionate amount of misdeeds, including crimes that were unheard of before they arrived in large numbers. Same with Gypsies but those have always been considered a more exotic type of Spaniards.Replies: @Yahya, @silviosilver
I like the idea of turning April into Ape-ril, in order to help popularize the great apes and to help educate about them, and their conservancy, as well as to serve as a counterpoint to the anti-biologism of certain other themed months.
Having a factoid about apes read to you over the intercom at school every day would not be so bad.
(*credit for that line goes to Objectivist doyen, Leonard Peikoff, who took it from the title of a 1950s-60s Catholic lecture series, "Life Is Worth Living," by Bishop Fulton Sheen.)Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @AaronB, @Barbarossa
Well, things are uncertain right now, but it’s really not so bad compared to a great many times in history. Thankfully Covid hardly put us into Black Death territory. We always have the nuclear holocaust wild card, but there’s not much any of us can do about that. In my humble opinion life is always worth living today as much as anytime. Gather ye rosebuds while ye may!
Sad story. The kid had good instincts, but poorly selected, compassion-generating targets. He should have bumped off his foster parents and blamed their death on immigrants – two birds with one stone. (Or “feed two birds with one scone, “as the fags at PETA would apparently prefer people to say.)
It’s not any physical hardships – or the threat of them – that dissipate my zest for living. Never before has our physical wellbeing been more secure. It’s the advancing frontiers of clownworld that sap my vitality.
Clownworld should collapse on it's own stupid contradictions eventually, so there's hope, but I don't have any illusions it's going to be pretty in the meantime.Replies: @silviosilver
You are the only ones that want to “negrify thy neighbor”(at any expense btw)as there is only one country that worships them and its surely not us. That hell that was created you seek to spread it across all corners of the globe .To corrupt and despoil the last untouched places that were not colonized by you in the previous century. And all 5 flavors of Anglo are marching lockstep in the empire, ca 10,000 twitter racists and 300 UNZ “racists” notwithstanding.
Whenever you see Blacks, troons, gays, Indians, insert other X colonial pets, being “oppressed” or something, one instantly knows there are traces of Whites/Anglos who had their hand in this somewhere and are the masterminds behind it.
Africans and Indians are simply a WEAPON you whites use to break and bludgeon other societies into submission. (and societies are an extremely fragile+ delicate thing)
And those 2 are favorite weapon at that(look at Burma even now the US State Department has called it a “Myanmar genocide”, right now as i speak Indian invaders aka Rohingya that were imported by the Anglos in the past are being weaponized against the natives of Myanmar and are used to destroy it).
And lot can be said about Ukraine but you are the superspreaders of it…this…should I say this.. “malady”, it all emanates from the West…the source of poison.
So maybe start changing your laws and people first then? Go after academia, DC state ghouls, and those ‘professors” that are creating the little monsters ?
The US is already what you would describe as “SJW” since the 60’s cultural revolution, and either you scrap America’s creed and try something else?(what you should try im not sure). But you guys will continue to carry out your insane mission until the end to save face. To give up on it means to give up on America and everything liberalism stands for, it will mean that it has failed..,
Even now with this post you were trying to make whites out of Europeans. wit this “white solidarity” and ideas. A le 56% mutt that doesn’t have any ties with his home country and normal Europeans.
Proves time and time again that Whites are some of the greatest enemies of the Europeans. And this isnt some lost rare hidden esoteric lore, this is something even 15 year old Finnish RW’ a understand that whites are an enemy.
We smaller guys need to be extra careful…a lot of whites look just like us…but instead they will gut you and wear your culture and everything you hold dear like a skinsuit…
However, you're barking up the wrong tree. While you're quite correct that all five flavors of Anglo assiduously attempt to negrify the remaining untouched realms of the europshere, they are not doing so in the belief that this debilitates those countries; on the contrary, they are, to varying degrees, convinced it's a benefit, and in any case, a moral obligation.
As you're not an anglophone, perhaps the reference wasn't clear to you. In the unsanitized form I originally proffered it, it was "nigger thy neighbor," which is a take-off from "beggar thy neighbor" - protectionist economic policies through which countries sought to gain an edge on each other, which resulted in everybody becoming poorer and which are generally blamed for deepening the Great Depression. In competing with each other, if we insist on negrifying our neighbors, we're all going to end up dumber, uglier, more violent and poorer.
If Europe is a particular political model or set of political ideals similar to that promoted by the EU, and a certain standard of living, you could say that Ukraine, Belarus, Moldova are not European, but by these standards neither were large parts of Western Europe till recently. If Poland and Portugal are European in this way now, no obvious reason Ukraine can't be.
Core Western countries have been undergoing a cultural revolution for a couple of decades (demographic change is only one part of it), with uncertain final results, here France is the example but something similar goes for the UK, Italy, probably Germany, so the understanding of what it means to be European is likely evolve again:
https://unherd.com/2022/04/america-has-captured-france/
Notice the de Maistre quoting hipsters are back in France...Replies: @Wokechoke, @Dmitry
It was only 10 years ago (which in some ways still feels like 10 minutes), there was Dmitry Medvedev as president in the Russian Federation. I don’t know if you know about him, but this is a politician who can imitate pro-Western attitudes. He was attempting to sound like an educated or civilized (objective, rational) politician, with speeches about “positive externalities”, or phrases like “value for taxpayers”.
We were eating “St Dalfour” confiture and they were making television series about how “cool” London is, back in those times. But do not view this too seriously. It’s psychologically mutually beneficial theatre, between the masters and slaves. When there is stress in the society, the illusion disappears. Masters are masters, and most are their slaves, and there was a theatre that slave owners are “public servants”, and the slaves are “Europeans”.
European values in the postsoviet space, are like these “Parisian lamps”, they buy for certain cities, which are made from plastic and purchased from China.
Although I think the Chinese are perhaps in a better situation, as they don’t need to waste resources with this theatre.
Well Belarus is kind of fortunate that everytime they look at their ruler Lukashenko, they never have to imagine they are in Europe.
I agree it’s possible. Just I won’t advise anyone to hope too much, unless they will still be hoping as an old man. Have you seen what Russell’s grandmother said above? And that only 200 years ago.
It’s interesting if you think about Spain, which was under dictatorship when Abba released their second album. Abba’s second album still sounds modern today. But Spain is now one of the more central component parts of Europe.
But look at people like Russell’s family’s policies 2 centuries ago. They were also in terror about the French Revolution, perhaps not so much less than de Maistre. And they respond by reducing their power, improving the countries’ political software. Imagination such a sophistication in Belarus. Maybe vision is narrowed by recent events, but it’s a little difficult for me to predict such a thing. It’s like England had political higher technology in this area than the postsoviet space, 2 centuries ago.
It even looked like things could be starting in this direction in Belarus before the 2020 election but the opposition movement was squashed, now following the Ukrainian war there seems low probability of it.
I think the British response was marked by its mixed nature, partly they conceded power, partly they expanded it in other directions (this period must be exceptional with how dynamic and expansive British power was becoming), they were both liberal but at the same time could seem like they were channelling a more reasonable and less enraged de Maistre.
I've been surprised by how resourceful the Belarusian regime was (though not in the direction of creating modern Europeans, in preserving itself), following the huge protests and the ferment, I was thinking it would be their 25th April like the Portuguese Revolution in 1974, somehow it seems there is a gap between the more liberal part of the population, the state and another more Sovok part outside the capital.Replies: @Dmitry
I would assume, most Caucasian soldiers recruited in the Russian army are those people in the Caucasian nationalities without such strong hostile or nationalist views. But those hostile or nationalist views, are of course not uncommon in their nationality.
So, why is there higher recruitment in those regions, where the nationalist and hostile views to the state, are higher than in Russian majority areas? It’s will be the more boring economic causes.
You know African American soldiers of Southern States, were the disproportionate part of the US army during the 1960s and Vietnam War. This was the same time as the Civil Rights Movement, with tensions between the wider African American population and the government in those regions.
If you watch Oliver Stone’s interviews about this war, he says African American soldiers were usually less believing in war or US ideology at this time, even though they were over represented in army inside Vietnam during this time.
Of course, the nationalist section of the African American population, were rejecting even conscription (Muhammad Ali was a famous example). But the non-political African Americans, were disproportionately part of the army.
Most all the time, Russia is not fighting any wars where large numbers of soldiers will die. They are doing calculated risk during the peacetime.
This current situation, where there is an invasion of Ukraine, is not normal.
If the soldier dies, the family receives compensation, but when they sign the contract, most of the soldiers are not expecting such a war.
Some of this is closure to the West, is already planned before the war, and can be partly motive for it, eccentric as this sounds.
The rulers (using plural for politeness) were entering a fragile period, partly with change in how people access media, and was likely need to re-fortify their position. Some of the re-fortification was attained after 2014. After 2014, there was also external reason of sanctions, that they could fault for the economic stagnation. Some things had been happening during the coronavirus period, including with surveillance technology.
Sanctions damage the long-term economic trajectory, but they don’t necessarily weaken the position of the politicians, and in the short-term at least probably strengthen them.
I can’t ever see AP as propaganda, because his views he wants us to agree with, are so idiosyncratically combined, and not possible for anyone else with a different personality to go with.
His views include mixes of more upper class version of Tucker Carlson/”deplorable” in America, combined with pro-Ukraine, combined with some kremlinbot views (support for Potemkin villages). Then add support for conquistadors’s warcrimes, support for Habsburg monarchy, not much interest in the European power-sharing or workers’ rights, with views of anti-Soviet, pro-Poland, supporter of “Just World Hypothesis” (applied to HIV) etc.
He also has panglossian views about topics like the income levels or culture in Ukraine, which does not match his views about America (where income and anglosaxon good behavior, is important) .
If you want to write propaganda for Ukraine, this is not what you would say. Moreover, he continues the same view mix of idiosyncrasy, without adjusting, and after Ukraine became the country most popular in the developed world, based on mapping about “democracy vs non-democracy”.
There is a forum user Jack D in the Steve Sailer forum, who has the most similar views overall with AP. But even Jack D does not have something this idiosyncratic to throw in the forums.
Jack D’s views about Ukraine and America are very similar to AP. Jack D has much more of the racist American views than AP, which also does not combine too well with his “Ellis Island immigrant” sympathy to Israel. As Israel is this chaotic, multiracial place, so how can American bourgeois person who support order and organized lawns, reconcile his values?
A funny thing is when I argued with Jack D and AP about Russia, they both said things which I think are completely ridiculous. Then I checked them, and they were right and I am wrong. AP was actually correct more often than I am, when I argued with him about Russia. They both have somekind of mysterious intuitive knowledge in this area that can seem to match reality when you check, more than locals’ common sense views.
AP was (self)assigned to Karlin blog do defend Ukrainian interests against mostly Russian prejudice. His job is easier than that of Jack D because hardly anybody knows anything about Ukrainians and for outsiders squabbles between Russians and Ukrainians are just as silly and meaningless as between Macedonians and Bulgarians and Serbians. However otoh Russia is in much better position because people know much more about it while Ukrainians are almost a blank slate. So professional Ukrainians can and must be more creative when inventing accomplishments they never had and famous figures who for strange reason are totally obscure and most importantly to work very hard on Ukrainian ethnogenesis and foundational myths to invent biological, linguistic and cultural separation from Russians.
Because of the difference between their subjects. Jak D and AP jobs are significantly different. The former is chiefly fending off accusations that Jews did something meaning that Jews were too active in history while AP deals with opposite that Ukrainians were too passive to the point they did nothing or that they did not exist. Fortunately for him in here in the righto-sphere accusation of cooperation with Nazis, holocaust and genocide were never in vogue because these are areas where Ukrainians actually excelled.
The jobs that Jack D and AP got themselves require talents where the adherence to truth is not of the highest order. Rhetorical effectiveness is what counts You must be ruthless and unscrupulous which comes under the guise of shameless chutzpah.
Most recent AP's invention was that Ukrainians in Red Army during WWII were less brutal than Russians and other ethnic groups and thus German_reader and all other Germans should love Ukrainians more. And as his strongest proof for his hypothesis he offered this:
"I have seen no evidence that Ukrainians engaged in the behavior in Germany to the extent that Russians or especially non-Slavs did. "
This is exactly what you expect from a professional Ukrainian: a faith based reality.
One could forward several arguments that brutality of Ukrainians was actually worse than Russians beginning with Karlin HBDism that Ukrainians have lower IQ than Russians and thus are more likely to engage in brutal acts
or
that Ukrainians after strong and very enthusiastic involvement in Holocaust and genocide of Poles were much more skillful rapists and butchers who already overcame all human inhibitions against murder and rape than Russians. By the end of WWII 40% of soldiers in Red Army were Ukrainians. 10% of all Ukrainians were drafted to Red Army however the highest proportion (16%) was from Volhynia where the pool of draftees consisted of experienced murderers and rapists.Replies: @Mr. Hack, @AP, @Dmitry
Wokechoke reviewing where he plans to build his new home in Mariupol?Replies: @Wokechoke
Biden’s son is the one smoking crack
Pfft, Medvedev, disgusting. At least Putin has an aura of personal dignity and doesn’t (publicly) fawn over consumer gadgets like an poorly raised child. It’s obvious in hindsight he was Putin’s stopgap ‘successor’ because he was such a pitiful nonentity.
денег нет, но вы держитесь
https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-170/#comment-5045616 (It's useful for power to have a friendly face and scary face, but in the end it is better to be feared than to be loved, and the halloween mask of certain politicians' faces are perhaps not unuseful for them for this reason). Of course, 2008-2012, was the moment in a hostage situation, when the Mexican kidnapping gang, relax and do not show their guns, get hostages the cup of tea, start to joke, imagine they are your friend. Hostages can forget their lack of power, and it's not much different than if they were sitting at home. Most of the time, the life in the police state is not much different to the life in the liberal democracy, especially if you don't think about it. It's really a minority of the time, when there is stress in the society, when the illusion cannot be maintained. But these moments of the stress in the society, are psychologically uncomfortable, as the real situation and lack of power cannot be distracted from. But in times of relaxation in between, your distraction can continue for years.
I don’t know what your personal situation is, but if you can find a way to do a decouple from clownworld , I’d reccommend it. There are spots out there where it’s not so bad and doesn’t affect day to day life at least. One can’t escape it entirely, but it’s a lot better for sanity.
Clownworld should collapse on it’s own stupid contradictions eventually, so there’s hope, but I don’t have any illusions it’s going to be pretty in the meantime.
Still, life is a struggle, and we struggle for the purpose getting somewhere, somewhere better than where we were yesterday, both as individuals and as societies. It's when I think about where we're going to be tomorrow, collectively, that I feel most disheartened. From my perspective, we're beavering away to create societies that very few us will actually want to live in. There are plenty who believe they will want to, of course, but in my estimate, very few who actually will. It'll just be more 'facts on the ground' that it's now tragically 'too late' to do anything about except grudgingly accept and work around as necessary.
RF long range rocketry strike frequency on UA has been reduced 3x lately, from roughly 300 a week in a first month to roughly 100 a week lately. Coupled with a fact they lately have been also using primary sea defense rocketry systems like Bastion for land targets, also old Tochkas in Donbas, it seems the main modern load has been already flown out.
Turns out the invasion into Taiwan in fall could still go thru - Xi is showing that economic calculus makes no bearing on his political resolve by the intentional debacle in Shanghai. Even a failed invasion would lend him and the Politburo the kind of state and society Kim and Putin now enjoy.
Take him with you. He knows how to find a good job in Ukraine.
If you have an open mind, you can learn about areas that are lethal to enter. (1) (2)
The Islamic efforts to create “No-Go Zones” in Portland and Minneapolis fortunately failed. When will America stand up to Muslim Antifa and Islamic BLM? Hopefully, before things deteriorate to the level of France.
PEACE 😇
_________
(1) From 2021 — https://genzconservative.com/no-go-zones-in-france/
(2) From 2020 — https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/15977/france-no-go-zones-riots
I believe this map is from 2015. The situation has gotten considerably worse since then.
Is Elon nuts to offer to pay good money for Twitter?
https://instapundit.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Screen-Shot-2022-04-14-at-1.58.03-PM.png
If there is one thing the Lügenpresse hates.... It is losing control of propaganda messaging.
____
As a minority share owner, Musk cannot fundamentally change the firm's policies. That is why he turned down the board seat.
One would guess he is positioning himself for the inevitable 2024 MAGA win. With regulatory mandates from the Executive branch, he will be able to discharge the fascists responsible for the current policy. At that point the ban hammer can come down hard on SJW hate, fiction, & propaganda.
Imagine ACLU and SPLC being banned from Twitter for supporting violence... The FBI banned for faking a kidnapping... Many great things ahead...
PEACE 😇Replies: @songbird
Russian military culture traditionally has been pretty brutal towards its own soldiers, so it might not be surprising that they're inclined to harsh behaviour against civilians when given the opportunity. I would have thought this had been remedied to some extent in the modern Russian army, but apparently not. Which makes Putin's decision for this war even more foolish imo. The news about Russian war crimes might well play a similar role to the German war crimes in Belgium in 1914 and make any negotiated end to the war much harder (there's already talk of indicting Putin in The Hague after all).Replies: @Wokechoke, @S
That might technically be true, but, is there much of a moral difference when by your hands you have reduced someone to a penury who will do anything for a tiny scrap of bread, or, sliver of soap?
Thank you sir. I only announced that I was taking a break as a sign of protest against utu’s misbehavior. But in retrospect, one needs to understand that in times of war passions run high. He even made some positive remarks towards GR and me while we were on strike. I’m sure deep inside he loves us both in his own tortured way.
No. I did enough of that in my rainy, muddy home country and now I prefer the more open forests of the arid regions. The spacing of the trees in a forest, a topic I know also interests AaronB, is something I could write a long essay about but it’s not the proper place or time.
lol
It’s been more than 20 years now since I left Europe (apart of a brief interlude in Ireland) but if you put it that way, it’s safe to say that the answer is no.
I would say that the propensity to use one language or another with strangers is similar in Spain-proper to any other country. If you look darker or lighter than the typical Spaniard (who has a rather wide variety of skin tones) the main influence in how people will address you is their own ability to speak another language, which used to be very poor in Spain.
Now, if we’re talking about friendliness to foreigners in Spain, there are some curious dynamics at play. Spaniards are more friendly than the average in Europe but people in Madrid and especially in Andalusia are more likely to be hostile to non-Europeans. I’ve witnessed this with my own eyes. Madrid has a long history of receiving economic migrants from all regions, especially from LATAM and MENA, and have developed their own animosities, including the invention of some ethnic slurs that later spread to other regions of Spain and even to LATAM itself, like sudacas (now being replaced by panchitos) or negratas.
Why Andalusians, arguably the least European region in mainland Spain, have sometimes hostile attitudes to third worlders that were unimaginable at the time in other parts of Spain I have no idea.
In the Basque Country we can be as racist as anyone but, for historical and folkloric reasons, we have always focused our racism on Spaniards, although this is in decline now. Other kind of foreigners are unlikely to experience any rejection, although we are not as extroverted as further south. In fact, non-Europeans would probably find that the Basque Country is quite a welcoming place, apart from the difficult language barrier. I think that this has a lot to do with Basque nationalism having developed strong ties with leftist anti-imperialist movements during the 60s that still linger on. However, I hear that people are getting tired of young Maghrebis committing a very disproportionate amount of misdeeds, including crimes that were unheard of before they arrived in large numbers. Same with Gypsies but those have always been considered a more exotic type of Spaniards.
Whereas my Egyptian mother and sister look more like this:https://www.enigma-mag.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Ms.-Jude-Benhalim-Ms.-Rana-El-Adem-Yosra-El-Lozy-Ms.-Jenan-Benhalim.jpg
To me, this behavioral pattern was very understandable. Here in Egypt, there are a fair number of English and French expats around, and as far as I've seen no Egyptian speaks to them in Arabic as if they thought they understood the language. Because it would be non-sensical to do so. Just as it would be non-sensical for a Spaniard to speak to an Arabian-looking tourist in Spanish. Silviosilver has difficulties comprehending all this. But then he is an ignoramus who thinks a Southern European population like Iberians are mostly "indistinguishable from Northern Europeans".Replies: @silviosilver
What do you make of AK’s schizo raving on the 11th that Putin will nuke somewhere in 36 hours? It’s more likely on NATO assets after Swedish and Finnish provocation.
Turns out the invasion into Taiwan in fall could still go thru – Xi is showing that economic calculus makes no bearing on his political resolve by the intentional debacle in Shanghai. Even a failed invasion would lend him and the Politburo the kind of state and society Kim and Putin now enjoy.
I plead guilty to being a person who thinks economic base being the main determinant of national power (but far from the only one).
As for Ukraine, it’s too early to say. The World Bank now says Ukraine’s economy will collapse by a cataclysmic -45% this year. The finance minister of Ukraine openly says that his country needs massive debt writeoffs.
Something I’ve said from the beginning is that Ukraine will pay a much greater economic price and the West’s true intentions will be judged by how much they will help them. I am not optimistic on their generosity, because my view is that Western capitals only view Ukrainians as expendable pawns to hurt Russia.
In fact, one could even look at it through a more sinister lens, where Globohomo is glad of the damage done to the Ukraine.
The displaced people open the door to more pathways of migration, for non-Europeans. For who would be willing to shut the door now? Even Ukrainians themselves will probably do a great deal of damage to nationalism in Western Europe. Irish authorities have offered to welcome 200,000 - that's more than 20x the Plantation of Ulster.
And what of Ukraine? The economic damage will mean that it is cheaper to buy influence. Mounting casualties might mean that society becomes less masculine.
And I'm not optimistic about this perceived mismatch between Ukrainian nationalism and Western aims. What matters more is organs of power and control. Those Ukrainian-ultras aren't going to become elementary school teachers, or TV moguls. Frankly, they have no chance against the endless NGOs that will be employed to subvert the society.Replies: @A123, @sudden death, @Yellowface Anon
I think AK's prediction that "shock and disbelief are inevitable" may yet be fulfilled - only that, Croesus-like, the shock and disbelief may be his own.
[For those unfamiliar with it, legend has it that Croesus, ruler of a large kingdom in western Anatolia, consulted an oracle about the prospects of going to war with the Persians. The oracle prophesied that if he went to war, a great empire would be destroyed. Thus encouraged, he warred on the Persians and was defeated - the empire that was destroyed was his own.]
Also, regarding the complaints about posting quality since the departure of several respected posters, true enough, but it's notable how few of the remaining posters seem to miss AK himself. (I don't. AK: "My consistent position has been that failure must always be brutally punished" Yeah, I can do without garbage-tier takes like that. Why must it be "brutally" punished? Oh, 'cause you're larping as an unsentimental tough guy, I forgot.)Replies: @Dmitry, @Thulean Friend
Russia will win. Unlike AK, I never believed that Putin had maximalist aims. He had limited aims at the negotiating table and all we’ve seen thus far indicates the same in this war.
I think people are vastly overestimating Ukraine’s military capabilities – which isn’t the same as willingness to fight.
Remember that 40+ km convoy outside of Kiev? It was sitting ducks. If Ukraine had any military capability, they’d bomb it to shreds given how exposed they were. But they couldn’t because even back then (3-4 weeks ago), they had very little counter-offensive means left.
They are now doing the best of a terrible situation: try to lure Russians into urban warfare like in Mariupol or in trenches/fortifications in the Donbass. The mass surrender that we saw yesterday from that city (1000+) will be repeated many times in Donbass over the coming weeks and months ahead.
The bigger problem for Russia, frankly, are long-term effects of the sanctions. I’m not talking of the energy sanctions or useless companies like McDonalds pulling out. I’m talking their aviation industry or their mobile internet network (which relies heavily on Huawei, which has been showing signs of increasingly complying with sanctions).
China might not agree to primary sanctions, but it can’t control what private Chinese firms will do when it comes to secondary sanctions. And the signs there are not fantastic.
China could learn the wrong lessons and go ahead with the Taiwanese military reunification this fall. They've shown us they have no economic calculus with the Shanghai lockdown, and maybe they are willing to give up part of the gains these 4 decades just to fulfill their mandate. What's being done can be well drawn to their logical conclusion to North Koreanize the society, and lockdowns can be used to discipline the Home Front. They can weather economic isolation better than Russia by having an actual industrial, technological and R&D base, and they can tell most of the world to bypass the Euro-Atlantic economic bloc. But their wish of applying pressure on the bloc would backfire - the oppositions in the US or Europe tend to be pro-Russia but anti-China.
(I am a Chinese shill but I do have some bottom lines - peaceful or opportunistic reunification is far more preferable than a brutal military one)Replies: @Thulean Friend
Russi and Ukraine both deny having Tochka U cluster bombs. The DNR is not discussed. However, Kramatorsk is in the DNR’s operational area.
It does not seem beyond belief that the cluster bomb dropped on Donetsk was a misfire. KRamatorsk being a succesful it, not just on the ammunition train, as believed (see MH17) but as a cluster bomb, disabling a whole railway junction.
THE MASTER AND HIS EMISSARY
by Iain McGilchrist
Reviewed by the Iraqi Information Minister
I read this book a couple years ago on the recommendation of Gary Lachman. Gary Lachman is a writer I sometimes enjoy reading. I have read 4 or 5 of his books, mostly cover to cover. He gives this McGilchrist book his highest recommendation. Like everybody should read this book.
Gary is mistaken.
This book is deeply flawed. I do not have time to write and you do not have time to read more than a small fraction of my arguments why. I will make this as brief as possible.
The bibliography is 60 pages long and the font is 4 point type. I picked one page to count the number of books. This page had 40 books on it. So the author has 2400 separate books in his bibliography. This is evidence that there is a fraud at the core here but I sure am not going to accuse I. M. of being a fraud. (On a side note there are also 50 pages of endnotes. 4 point type.)
Analogy. This experiment would be expensive for one guy but if you have a discretionary research budget you might like to have a go at it. If so you may consider this a Free Idea. Go to the finest restaurant in your city. In New Orleans this might be Commander’s Palace and that would be a good choice but choose any one. Now there are only a couple-three short steps in this proc.
I. Get one of everything on their dinner menu, to go.
II. Take the stack of to-go styrofoam containers, all 100-300 of them, to your van and proceed directly to your laboratory.
III. Pour the contents of all 100-300 containers into a huge mixing bowl. You will need approximately the volume of a pot that a Borneo cannibal could use to boil a missionary. Lots of liters.
III. Stir really really really well. Like the 2nd or 3rd top speed on your kitchen top blender like you are making a protein + supplement drink for your workout.
IV. What have you got?
Something analagous to the textual product in The Master and His Emissary is what you will have got.
There are some very good bits in this book. This is not a good book.
This is right, Russia will win tactically and strategically from Putin’s lens, especially domestically since Putin wants to be some kind of Kim or Khamenei, but their national power is set for a deep Iranization, the ideal of Eurasians who kind of want a withered archeofuturist economy. My biggest worry right now is escalation from Sweden and Finland joining NATO, that provides a pretext for Putin to use tactical nukes. Again, a pyrrhic win for NATO.
China could learn the wrong lessons and go ahead with the Taiwanese military reunification this fall. They’ve shown us they have no economic calculus with the Shanghai lockdown, and maybe they are willing to give up part of the gains these 4 decades just to fulfill their mandate. What’s being done can be well drawn to their logical conclusion to North Koreanize the society, and lockdowns can be used to discipline the Home Front. They can weather economic isolation better than Russia by having an actual industrial, technological and R&D base, and they can tell most of the world to bypass the Euro-Atlantic economic bloc. But their wish of applying pressure on the bloc would backfire – the oppositions in the US or Europe tend to be pro-Russia but anti-China.
(I am a Chinese shill but I do have some bottom lines – peaceful or opportunistic reunification is far more preferable than a brutal military one)
Indo-Europeans roamed the Pontic steppe north of the Caspian Sea – somewhat westward from Kazakhstan.
Nor did the source populations of Indo-Europeans come from the eastern steppes.
Well, there is some truth to his claims (though i’m skeptical of precise co-ordinates). But ultimately the Indo-Aryans were a mixed-origin people. Genetic studies indicate Yamnaya pastoralists were roughly 50% derived of eastern hunter-gatherers from the steppes of Ukraine/Russia, and 50% derived from Iranian farmers. The latter component was introduced into a base population of EHGs roughly 5,000-7,000 years ago. The Iranian farmers are most closely related to present-day Mingrelians, from the backwoods of Georgia. Also Armenians and Iranians to a lesser extent.
This leads some to speculate that Iranian farmer originated somewhere in the Caucasus, rather than Iran proper. But David Reich reassures that they came from further south in Iran. Either way, Iranian farmers only comprised half of Indo-European ancestry, the rest being indigenous hunter-gatherers from the Pontic Steppe. So there is no single definitive Garden Of Eden.
Memorials haven't changed all that much in 2500 years it would seem.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/aa/Tomb_of_Darius_I_DNa_inscription.jpg/800px-Tomb_of_Darius_I_DNa_inscription.jpg
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tomb_of_Darius_the_Great
https://styles.redditmedia.com/t5_2ws4n/styles/image_widget_is6coc4xem041.jpg?format=pjpg&s=e516d9dc2e681eb7d7044279ead34a3e4056a0a4
Nor did the source populations of Indo-Europeans come from the eastern steppes. Well, there is some truth to his claims (though i'm skeptical of precise co-ordinates). But ultimately the Indo-Aryans were a mixed-origin people. Genetic studies indicate Yamnaya pastoralists were roughly 50% derived of eastern hunter-gatherers from the steppes of Ukraine/Russia, and 50% derived from Iranian farmers. The latter component was introduced into a base population of EHGs roughly 5,000-7,000 years ago. The Iranian farmers are most closely related to present-day Mingrelians, from the backwoods of Georgia. Also Armenians and Iranians to a lesser extent.This leads some to speculate that Iranian farmer originated somewhere in the Caucasus, rather than Iran proper. But David Reich reassures that they came from further south in Iran. Either way, Iranian farmers only comprised half of Indo-European ancestry, the rest being indigenous hunter-gatherers from the Pontic Steppe. So there is no single definitive Garden Of Eden.Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @S
Have you watched any of his video talks? I tried but I find his presentation style unwatchable.
Is the Moskva a validation of the idea of distributed naval power?
_________
IMO, Musk would be crazy if he spent $41 billion more on Twitter.
Instead, I would advise him to become a Chinese media mogul.
It would be easy and would not require a great deal of creativity. Since the Chinese media market is non-competitive globally, the Chinese adaption rights for most things could be had for a song. And once you have an idea, it is easy to make improvements on it. Not to mention that in China, anything where the author died 50 years ago is out of copyright, so that leaves a lot on the table.
And the quality of most top-performing Chinese movies is not very high, so being competitive is an approachable goal.
Elon’s purchase of a Twitter stake has sent the Nazi-crats into a total meltdown
If there is one thing the Lügenpresse hates…. It is losing control of propaganda messaging.
____
As a minority share owner, Musk cannot fundamentally change the firm’s policies. That is why he turned down the board seat.
One would guess he is positioning himself for the inevitable 2024 MAGA win. With regulatory mandates from the Executive branch, he will be able to discharge the fascists responsible for the current policy. At that point the ban hammer can come down hard on SJW hate, fiction, & propaganda.
Imagine ACLU and SPLC being banned from Twitter for supporting violence… The FBI banned for faking a kidnapping… Many great things ahead…
PEACE 😇
But I'm still not sure what Musk's game is. Maybe, to pump the stock and then sell?
In principle, I think he is too tied into the system to really challenge it much. And, while I do enjoy the Bee, I don't know if them not having intermittent bans is worth $41 billion. Can't really see it going to any thing less than Jack levels of censorship. One problem is that they need to comply with a lot of draconian laws outside the US. Another is that, within the US, Musk depends on government subsidies and friendly regulations.
I would say that the propensity to use one language or another with strangers is similar in Spain-proper to any other country. If you look darker or lighter than the typical Spaniard (who has a rather wide variety of skin tones) the main influence in how people will address you is their own ability to speak another language, which used to be very poor in Spain.
Now, if we're talking about friendliness to foreigners in Spain, there are some curious dynamics at play. Spaniards are more friendly than the average in Europe but people in Madrid and especially in Andalusia are more likely to be hostile to non-Europeans. I've witnessed this with my own eyes. Madrid has a long history of receiving economic migrants from all regions, especially from LATAM and MENA, and have developed their own animosities, including the invention of some ethnic slurs that later spread to other regions of Spain and even to LATAM itself, like sudacas (now being replaced by panchitos) or negratas.
Why Andalusians, arguably the least European region in mainland Spain, have sometimes hostile attitudes to third worlders that were unimaginable at the time in other parts of Spain I have no idea.
In the Basque Country we can be as racist as anyone but, for historical and folkloric reasons, we have always focused our racism on Spaniards, although this is in decline now. Other kind of foreigners are unlikely to experience any rejection, although we are not as extroverted as further south. In fact, non-Europeans would probably find that the Basque Country is quite a welcoming place, apart from the difficult language barrier. I think that this has a lot to do with Basque nationalism having developed strong ties with leftist anti-imperialist movements during the 60s that still linger on. However, I hear that people are getting tired of young Maghrebis committing a very disproportionate amount of misdeeds, including crimes that were unheard of before they arrived in large numbers. Same with Gypsies but those have always been considered a more exotic type of Spaniards.Replies: @Yahya, @silviosilver
My families’ experience in Spain 11 years ago was that locals would more frequently approach the lighter, Mediterranean-looking members of my family (myself, sister, mother) and speak to us in Spanish, but would not be so quick to either approach or use Spanish (instead opting for non-verbal cues or English when they can) with my darker, Arabian-looking brother and father.
For reference, my Saudi father looks like this:

Whereas my Egyptian mother and sister look more like this:

To me, this behavioral pattern was very understandable. Here in Egypt, there are a fair number of English and French expats around, and as far as I’ve seen no Egyptian speaks to them in Arabic as if they thought they understood the language. Because it would be non-sensical to do so. Just as it would be non-sensical for a Spaniard to speak to an Arabian-looking tourist in Spanish.
Silviosilver has difficulties comprehending all this. But then he is an ignoramus who thinks a Southern European population like Iberians are mostly “indistinguishable from Northern Europeans”.
Of course, I would stand by the claim they are vastly more similar to northern Europeans than to Arabs. It's only the balkans - and even then, the more southerly regions of it - that one could claim have more in common with the middle east, or the Levant anyway, than they do to northern Europe. Genes supposedly tell a different story, but for all practical purposes race means looks, and if not looks then nothing. (That is, if we all looked the same but differed just as much as we do today in genes, race would be sociopolitically inert.)
_________
IMO, Musk would be crazy if he spent $41 billion more on Twitter.
Instead, I would advise him to become a Chinese media mogul.
It would be easy and would not require a great deal of creativity. Since the Chinese media market is non-competitive globally, the Chinese adaption rights for most things could be had for a song. And once you have an idea, it is easy to make improvements on it. Not to mention that in China, anything where the author died 50 years ago is out of copyright, so that leaves a lot on the table.
And the quality of most top-performing Chinese movies is not very high, so being competitive is an approachable goal.Replies: @Yellowface Anon
How would distributed naval power pool resources into things like naval aviation, large surface combatants or a missile system, or should those be done away?
I believe the benefits of a "missile cruiser" (longer range missiles) don't outweigh the liabilities - being a big, eggs in one basket target. I think a lot of the functionality could be had with about half the displacement, even without radically altering doctrine. If you need to fire so far inland, that you can't do it with a destroyer, you are probably better off using bombers or intercontinental ballistic missiles.
With aircraft carriers, what is needed is only what the US doesn't even bother calling a "carrier."
Iron Beam — Is the era of the hypersonic weapon over before it begins?
Hypersonic weapons are supposedly dangerous because they can maneuver near the target. While potentially useful against interceptor missiles, what happens when the counter battery is a directed energy weapon? (1)
The first generation of Iron Beam is intended for smaller slower targets, there does no reason to believe that it will not scale up. An aircraft (or drone?) mounted version is already in the works.
PEACE 😇
__________
(1) https://www.rt.com/news/553898-israel-defense-laser-tests/
They are probably not out of them, but thought they would be vastly more effective and have already used for more that they thought would be needed. The smart bombs used in the shock and awe American victories against Iraq were thought to be a way Russia could compensate for its post Soviet lack of numerical superiority. “Parts of the literature [ Russian military thinking] substantially de-emphasize seizing and holding ground,” and “a fixation with ‘non-contact warfare’ appears to have permeated Russian thinking since the late Soviet era”. In this war the Russians are going from one extreme to another in a few months, readying themselves in Donbass for an offensive that can only succeed through total commitment to plough on despite extremely heavy casualties against a well prepared defence
However, the days when a Russian army was trained, organized, and disciplined for fighting like that are long gone, as is the wherewithal for a couple of additional echelons to follow the first wave. Furthermore the ground is soaked and the trucks logistically supporting the Russian advance will not be able to move off-road; even the tracked vehicles will have limited mobility . The leaves are back on the the trees, so giving concealment for anti tank teams, which make up such a high proportion of the Ukrainian infantry and even the shorter range shoulder AT guided rockets Ukraine has so many of can get hits at 800 m. The US is giving Ukraine real-time information on every move the Russians make and the drones give pinpoint accuracy to artillery, which Ukraine has a substantial amount of in the Donbass. I think Putin–if determined to go ahead–ought to call out the reserves. All indications are his army is too small and is going to get seven bells knocked out of it.
And in the same part of the world. So there's that.Replies: @Wokechoke, @Wokechoke
Yen and Euro free falling.
No. I’ve only read Who We Are and How We Got Here, which is an excellent book btw. Can’t complain about the writing style or the presentation of his data.
Generally, I find that clear writing is not necessarily perfectly correlated with clear speaking. Nassim Taleb, Steve Sailer, Paul Krugman come to mind as excellent writers who struggle to speak eloquently. On the other hand, some public intellectuals like Charles Murray, Bertrand Russell and Richard Dawkins have no trouble expressing themselves well across both mediums.
I tend to prefer the written over the spoken word. Words tend to be more carefully selected and easier to absorb and retain. I also find books to contain more insight per time spent than lectures or speeches.
1. I find your posts perfectly intelligible.
2. I haven't gotten far past the point in the book where he writes:
this is a subject on which I can speak with great authority
p xxi in the Introduction for God's sake we have not even entered the purported main text body yet. I have gotten to p. 19 and it is a chore to read this presentation of material in which I am interested.
3. I was keen to read a second opinion on his presentation style. I am reluctant to write this but he appears to me a flaming homosexual. I find the part in the preface where he states he is married to a person with a female first name confusing.
In spite him claiming it to be so, I see no evidence for him being an authority on anything other than his first hand experience in obtaining an ostensibly respectable job. Which is nothing to sneeze at. Perhaps it is a joke over my head that we all should be bent over in laughter at a flaming homosexual speaking with great authority?Replies: @songbird, @Yahya
Call me when their exchange rates look like the Turkish Lira. (They won’t yet)
US satellites will go down when the offensives start.
China could learn the wrong lessons and go ahead with the Taiwanese military reunification this fall. They've shown us they have no economic calculus with the Shanghai lockdown, and maybe they are willing to give up part of the gains these 4 decades just to fulfill their mandate. What's being done can be well drawn to their logical conclusion to North Koreanize the society, and lockdowns can be used to discipline the Home Front. They can weather economic isolation better than Russia by having an actual industrial, technological and R&D base, and they can tell most of the world to bypass the Euro-Atlantic economic bloc. But their wish of applying pressure on the bloc would backfire - the oppositions in the US or Europe tend to be pro-Russia but anti-China.
(I am a Chinese shill but I do have some bottom lines - peaceful or opportunistic reunification is far more preferable than a brutal military one)Replies: @Thulean Friend
I’ve always found you reasonable and even-handed when it comes to matters of China, which is why I value your opinions. It’s an emotionally difficult thing to do when it is “close to home”, even for highly intelligent people (e.g. Mr. Chieh was notoriously unable to deviate even one cm from the official CCP line, despite being interesting and knowledgeable in most other respects).
I’d like to think that the CCP is pursuing a long-term objective of “peaceful reunification” as Plan A since China isn’t strong enough to fully withstand the economic pressures from abroad just yet. A total tech embargo would hurt their fledging chip industry immensely. SMIC still relies on imported ASML machines, even for their older nodes.
Xi is very powerful, but does he have better intelligence than Putin has, and which is able to provide him with a realistic view of the world’s balance of power? Let’s hope so, for world peace.
We have not yet decided if we want to join NATO, but everything points to that direction. Finland has clearly indicated that they wish to join together with us and our countries’ fates are bound together.
The Swedish government initially tried to explore the option of deepening the EU defence clause (it has more wiggle-room than NATO) but this was judged an uncertain prospect, stretching potentially years. Then, bilateral treaties (like the one we have with Finland) was considered, but the efficacy of this approach is likely lower than an umbrella treat with 30 states.
The time for making a formal application will likely be held in June. During this time, Sweden and Finland will seek out security guarantees from NATO in order to ward off any potential provocation from Russia.
I share your concern about nuclear weapons, though I perceive a Russian pre-emptive attack as unlikely. Instead, you ought to expect a nuclear build-up at Kaliningrad, which will have destabilising effects. However, the security situation has fundamentally changed and this is a risk that we have to accept. There are no risk-free choices in life.
Russia had contingency plans of nuking Stockholm during the Cold War and there are still many bunkers designed to withstand a nuclear attack from that era, including just ~900m from my apartment. I pass it several times a week. I suspect that we would see a general reconstruction programme to bring these dilapidated bunkers up to modern standards.
It might be worth noting that even Chapter Five of the Nato charter (far more binding than anything Taiwan has) is only an ostensible guarantees rather that the cast iron one sometimes assumed; it has a provision that each member country has to be satisfied that the war was not started by a fellow NATO member to be obliged to come to its aid. Taiwanese officials do not have the power to involve the US in a war with China, the only result of Taiwan's leaders trying it would be to put them in their graves.Replies: @Yellowface Anon
IMO, there is too much dick-measuring that goes on with these things. Command still likes to have a big ship, as though it is the time of dreadnoughts. And when they are in the Black Sea, which is basically an inland salt-water lake.
I believe the benefits of a “missile cruiser” (longer range missiles) don’t outweigh the liabilities – being a big, eggs in one basket target. I think a lot of the functionality could be had with about half the displacement, even without radically altering doctrine. If you need to fire so far inland, that you can’t do it with a destroyer, you are probably better off using bombers or intercontinental ballistic missiles.
With aircraft carriers, what is needed is only what the US doesn’t even bother calling a “carrier.”
Hypersonic weapons are supposedly dangerous because they can maneuver near the target. While potentially useful against interceptor missiles, what happens when the counter battery is a directed energy weapon? (1)
https://cdni.russiatoday.com/files/2022.04/original/625865302030270dee3498dd.jpg
The first generation of Iron Beam is intended for smaller slower targets, there does no reason to believe that it will not scale up. An aircraft (or drone?) mounted version is already in the works.
PEACE 😇
__________
(1) https://www.rt.com/news/553898-israel-defense-laser-tests/Replies: @Wokechoke
Hebrew Space Laser
As for Ukraine, it's too early to say. The World Bank now says Ukraine's economy will collapse by a cataclysmic -45% this year. The finance minister of Ukraine openly says that his country needs massive debt writeoffs.
Something I've said from the beginning is that Ukraine will pay a much greater economic price and the West's true intentions will be judged by how much they will help them. I am not optimistic on their generosity, because my view is that Western capitals only view Ukrainians as expendable pawns to hurt Russia.Replies: @songbird
I’ve been discouraged from making predictions. But I will make one: I think that the West will supply bigger and bigger weapons systems.
I concur.
In fact, one could even look at it through a more sinister lens, where Globohomo is glad of the damage done to the Ukraine.
The displaced people open the door to more pathways of migration, for non-Europeans. For who would be willing to shut the door now? Even Ukrainians themselves will probably do a great deal of damage to nationalism in Western Europe. Irish authorities have offered to welcome 200,000 – that’s more than 20x the Plantation of Ulster.
And what of Ukraine? The economic damage will mean that it is cheaper to buy influence. Mounting casualties might mean that society becomes less masculine.
And I’m not optimistic about this perceived mismatch between Ukrainian nationalism and Western aims. What matters more is organs of power and control. Those Ukrainian-ultras aren’t going to become elementary school teachers, or TV moguls. Frankly, they have no chance against the endless NGOs that will be employed to subvert the society.
The #1 objective of IslamoGloboHomo and the WEF Elites is maximizing the number of non-Christian rape-ugees. Creating genuine Ukrainian refugees is essential cover for Open [Muslim] Borders.
The Fake Stream Media raised the "Russia, Russia, Russia" myth to the status of unquestionable dogma. Harming Russia's Christian population is at most a secondary objective. It is closer to convention "fanservice" than rational national policy.
PEACE 😇Replies: @sudden death
All wars since Vietnam are used to exploit the labor of war-torn zones.
In fact, one could even look at it through a more sinister lens, where Globohomo is glad of the damage done to the Ukraine.
The displaced people open the door to more pathways of migration, for non-Europeans. For who would be willing to shut the door now? Even Ukrainians themselves will probably do a great deal of damage to nationalism in Western Europe. Irish authorities have offered to welcome 200,000 - that's more than 20x the Plantation of Ulster.
And what of Ukraine? The economic damage will mean that it is cheaper to buy influence. Mounting casualties might mean that society becomes less masculine.
And I'm not optimistic about this perceived mismatch between Ukrainian nationalism and Western aims. What matters more is organs of power and control. Those Ukrainian-ultras aren't going to become elementary school teachers, or TV moguls. Frankly, they have no chance against the endless NGOs that will be employed to subvert the society.Replies: @A123, @sudden death, @Yellowface Anon
This is very close to the position I have been suggesting for some time. Except, I believe that the priorities are in the opposite order.
The #1 objective of IslamoGloboHomo and the WEF Elites is maximizing the number of non-Christian rape-ugees. Creating genuine Ukrainian refugees is essential cover for Open [Muslim] Borders.
The Fake Stream Media raised the “Russia, Russia, Russia” myth to the status of unquestionable dogma. Harming Russia’s Christian population is at most a secondary objective. It is closer to convention “fanservice” than rational national policy.
PEACE 😇
Taiwan does not claim to be independent, and China has publicly said Taiwan will will be invaded if it declaires independence, so Taiwan won’t. It is highly questionable whether the US would be happy with the Taiwanese precipitating a Chinese attack by making such a unilateral declaration of independence. Since 1980 there is no kind of formal guarantee the U.S. will intervene militarily if China invades Taiwan.
It might be worth noting that even Chapter Five of the Nato charter (far more binding than anything Taiwan has) is only an ostensible guarantees rather that the cast iron one sometimes assumed; it has a provision that each member country has to be satisfied that the war was not started by a fellow NATO member to be obliged to come to its aid. Taiwanese officials do not have the power to involve the US in a war with China, the only result of Taiwan’s leaders trying it would be to put them in their graves.
There are tons of lessons the CCP and the West can learn from each other (the less restraining parts, of course). Learning and adaptation are at the core of Dengism of which Xi wishes to reverse some of the legacies. (And often I say very deranged schizo things that aren’t really my own opinions but echoing others, like Svevlad. That is me testing out right-wing ideologies)
This is the most prudent strategically, but the “Russian leaked intel” and the lockdowns in Shanghai are changing my opinion the way I explained. These implications might be overlooked – they might consider acquiring necessary technology thru friendly non-sanctioned states even if their numbers will eventually dwindle, or scavenge useful material from the wreck of the Taiwanese industry in the case of an invasion.
He still have a Politburo to fall back on even if they are increasingly symbolic. There will certainly be consensus and dissent among the ranks of top decision makers, and purges and changes of mind.
In fact, one could even look at it through a more sinister lens, where Globohomo is glad of the damage done to the Ukraine.
The displaced people open the door to more pathways of migration, for non-Europeans. For who would be willing to shut the door now? Even Ukrainians themselves will probably do a great deal of damage to nationalism in Western Europe. Irish authorities have offered to welcome 200,000 - that's more than 20x the Plantation of Ulster.
And what of Ukraine? The economic damage will mean that it is cheaper to buy influence. Mounting casualties might mean that society becomes less masculine.
And I'm not optimistic about this perceived mismatch between Ukrainian nationalism and Western aims. What matters more is organs of power and control. Those Ukrainian-ultras aren't going to become elementary school teachers, or TV moguls. Frankly, they have no chance against the endless NGOs that will be employed to subvert the society.Replies: @A123, @sudden death, @Yellowface Anon
Would be interesting to see more expanded reasoning from a racist how white christian immigrants will do more damage to white european nationalism? This is not sarcastic question, I’m really curious about this logic.
Ukrainians will bring their ethnic antagonisms for Russians, the largest Euro country, outside the GAE powerblock. They'll seriously sabotage any sort of pan-European nationalism, or potential realignment away from America.
When they come, about 30% of the entry numbers, riding the same trains and buses, will be blacks, Indians, and Arabs. You can already see it, in the pictures. Many which are so embarrassing, and counter the narrative, that they have been pulled from government postings.
They are not going to identify with national history. Something like the Cromwellian Conquest or the Easter Rising will be boring to them. The Irish language will be about as interesting as it is to a Nigerian. They won't be blood and soil nationalists; the very idea will make them uncomfortable.
And their discomfort will be a dampening rod, for ethnic nationalists. If your old elementary school is suddenly over half Ukrainian (and that is the sort of thing I have heard) it is seriously going to dampen any national feelings.
Men are encouraged to stay. What the West will be getting is an infusion of pure estrogen, dependent on government handouts. Housing them will raise rents and getting them jobs will depress wages. It will make family formation more difficult. And with the imbalanced sex ratio, it may encourage miscegenation.
Currently, Europe doesn't have any sort of pan-ethnic cultural apparatus. There's a bit of it, buried deep in history, but there is no modern organ to compete with Hollywood, to spread a pan-national message. What they will get is the multicult message of Hollywood.
The younger ones will be fed straight into the public school system, where they will be indoctrinated. They will support refugees. After all, how could they not? It would be hypocritical for them not to, and, more-ever, it wouldn't gain them any victim points - and we live in a culture that elevates victims.
When politicians say "We are an immigrant nation" it will resonate with them, and they will nod their heads in agreement.Replies: @sudden death, @A123, @Coconuts
The #1 objective of IslamoGloboHomo and the WEF Elites is maximizing the number of non-Christian rape-ugees. Creating genuine Ukrainian refugees is essential cover for Open [Muslim] Borders.
The Fake Stream Media raised the "Russia, Russia, Russia" myth to the status of unquestionable dogma. Harming Russia's Christian population is at most a secondary objective. It is closer to convention "fanservice" than rational national policy.
PEACE 😇Replies: @sudden death
IslamoPutin with his pet Muslim warlords did this – Putin clearly IS a Muslim!
Expending an expendable population subgroup is very "Killer" KGB. That seems like his true, personal devotion.
PEACE 😇
https://cilisos.my/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/putin.pngReplies: @sudden death
https://instapundit.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Screen-Shot-2022-04-14-at-1.58.03-PM.png
If there is one thing the Lügenpresse hates.... It is losing control of propaganda messaging.
____
As a minority share owner, Musk cannot fundamentally change the firm's policies. That is why he turned down the board seat.
One would guess he is positioning himself for the inevitable 2024 MAGA win. With regulatory mandates from the Executive branch, he will be able to discharge the fascists responsible for the current policy. At that point the ban hammer can come down hard on SJW hate, fiction, & propaganda.
Imagine ACLU and SPLC being banned from Twitter for supporting violence... The FBI banned for faking a kidnapping... Many great things ahead...
PEACE 😇Replies: @songbird
It’s fun watching these blue checkmarks overreact.
But I’m still not sure what Musk’s game is. Maybe, to pump the stock and then sell?
In principle, I think he is too tied into the system to really challenge it much. And, while I do enjoy the Bee, I don’t know if them not having intermittent bans is worth $41 billion. Can’t really see it going to any thing less than Jack levels of censorship. One problem is that they need to comply with a lot of draconian laws outside the US. Another is that, within the US, Musk depends on government subsidies and friendly regulations.
In fact, one could even look at it through a more sinister lens, where Globohomo is glad of the damage done to the Ukraine.
The displaced people open the door to more pathways of migration, for non-Europeans. For who would be willing to shut the door now? Even Ukrainians themselves will probably do a great deal of damage to nationalism in Western Europe. Irish authorities have offered to welcome 200,000 - that's more than 20x the Plantation of Ulster.
And what of Ukraine? The economic damage will mean that it is cheaper to buy influence. Mounting casualties might mean that society becomes less masculine.
And I'm not optimistic about this perceived mismatch between Ukrainian nationalism and Western aims. What matters more is organs of power and control. Those Ukrainian-ultras aren't going to become elementary school teachers, or TV moguls. Frankly, they have no chance against the endless NGOs that will be employed to subvert the society.Replies: @A123, @sudden death, @Yellowface Anon
You’re right judging from Syria and Libya – much of those migrants aren’t from Syria or Libya themselves but Sub-Sahara Africa and other parts of Middle East. Probably Muslim Caucasians (irony) and Central Asians will use Ukraine as transit when things settle down.
All wars since Vietnam are used to exploit the labor of war-torn zones.
: (
1. I find your posts perfectly intelligible.
2. I haven’t gotten far past the point in the book where he writes:
this is a subject on which I can speak with great authority
p xxi in the Introduction for God’s sake we have not even entered the purported main text body yet. I have gotten to p. 19 and it is a chore to read this presentation of material in which I am interested.
3. I was keen to read a second opinion on his presentation style. I am reluctant to write this but he appears to me a flaming homosexual. I find the part in the preface where he states he is married to a person with a female first name confusing.
In spite him claiming it to be so, I see no evidence for him being an authority on anything other than his first hand experience in obtaining an ostensibly respectable job. Which is nothing to sneeze at. Perhaps it is a joke over my head that we all should be bent over in laughter at a flaming homosexual speaking with great authority?
Very cringe, but I’ll pretend I didn’t see that.
Ukrainians will bring their ethnic antagonisms for Russians, the largest Euro country, outside the GAE powerblock. They’ll seriously sabotage any sort of pan-European nationalism, or potential realignment away from America.
When they come, about 30% of the entry numbers, riding the same trains and buses, will be blacks, Indians, and Arabs. You can already see it, in the pictures. Many which are so embarrassing, and counter the narrative, that they have been pulled from government postings.
They are not going to identify with national history. Something like the Cromwellian Conquest or the Easter Rising will be boring to them. The Irish language will be about as interesting as it is to a Nigerian. They won’t be blood and soil nationalists; the very idea will make them uncomfortable.
And their discomfort will be a dampening rod, for ethnic nationalists. If your old elementary school is suddenly over half Ukrainian (and that is the sort of thing I have heard) it is seriously going to dampen any national feelings.
Men are encouraged to stay. What the West will be getting is an infusion of pure estrogen, dependent on government handouts. Housing them will raise rents and getting them jobs will depress wages. It will make family formation more difficult. And with the imbalanced sex ratio, it may encourage miscegenation.
Currently, Europe doesn’t have any sort of pan-ethnic cultural apparatus. There’s a bit of it, buried deep in history, but there is no modern organ to compete with Hollywood, to spread a pan-national message. What they will get is the multicult message of Hollywood.
The younger ones will be fed straight into the public school system, where they will be indoctrinated. They will support refugees. After all, how could they not? It would be hypocritical for them not to, and, more-ever, it wouldn’t gain them any victim points – and we live in a culture that elevates victims.
When politicians say “We are an immigrant nation” it will resonate with them, and they will nod their heads in agreement.
Or white native slavic Ukrainians themselves are not white enough?Replies: @songbird
The Maastricht Treaty concept of Schengen, unlimited migration within the EU, makes it much harder for sovereign European nations to resist the even more destructive MENA origin migrants.
We have had 20 years of EU "mixing". Is Europe better off?
I do not see it. Intra-EU migration has been bad for TFR in the 'donor' nations. And, suppressed authentic citizen wages in the 'recipient' countries. MegaCorporations won, people lost.
PEACE 😇
__________
(1)'https://gatesofvienna.net/2022/04/migrants-r-us/Replies: @songbird
1. I find your posts perfectly intelligible.
2. I haven't gotten far past the point in the book where he writes:
this is a subject on which I can speak with great authority
p xxi in the Introduction for God's sake we have not even entered the purported main text body yet. I have gotten to p. 19 and it is a chore to read this presentation of material in which I am interested.
3. I was keen to read a second opinion on his presentation style. I am reluctant to write this but he appears to me a flaming homosexual. I find the part in the preface where he states he is married to a person with a female first name confusing.
In spite him claiming it to be so, I see no evidence for him being an authority on anything other than his first hand experience in obtaining an ostensibly respectable job. Which is nothing to sneeze at. Perhaps it is a joke over my head that we all should be bent over in laughter at a flaming homosexual speaking with great authority?Replies: @songbird, @Yahya
I tried reading it, and I couldn’t.
Two reasons. First is that I had already heard practically all of it. Second is that he’s very PC, and you know that he is going to use a lot of squid language and not say anything controversial. Probably because he doesn’t want the heat, but, maybe, because it genuinely makes him feel uncomfortable.
2) See #1.Replies: @songbird
1. I find your posts perfectly intelligible.
2. I haven't gotten far past the point in the book where he writes:
this is a subject on which I can speak with great authority
p xxi in the Introduction for God's sake we have not even entered the purported main text body yet. I have gotten to p. 19 and it is a chore to read this presentation of material in which I am interested.
3. I was keen to read a second opinion on his presentation style. I am reluctant to write this but he appears to me a flaming homosexual. I find the part in the preface where he states he is married to a person with a female first name confusing.
In spite him claiming it to be so, I see no evidence for him being an authority on anything other than his first hand experience in obtaining an ostensibly respectable job. Which is nothing to sneeze at. Perhaps it is a joke over my head that we all should be bent over in laughter at a flaming homosexual speaking with great authority?Replies: @songbird, @Yahya
Razib Khan and Gregory Cochran attest to Reich’s competence and reliability.
https://razib.substack.com/p/rkul-time-well-spent-12122021?s=r
https://razib.substack.com/p/should-we-get-woke-on-genetics-and?s=r
https://westhunt.wordpress.com/2018/03/29/who-we-are-1/
https://westhunt.wordpress.com/2019/01/18/primitive-tribesmen-complain-about-technologically-superior-invaders/
Your main objection to Reich seems to be on style not substance. While I dislike the effeminate, hand-wringing, sanctimonious manner commonly found among the SWPL milieu I went to college with, the substance of his work has to be separated from the style. Him being a homosexual should not be taken into consideration when judging the accuracy of his findings on Indian genetics.
After I finish reading the book I will probably trash it.
Do these guys have a handy opinion on Spencer Wells getting exiled across the Pacific Ocean after he wrote something rude regarding Zion on twitter?
your second razib khan link is paywalled at my ISP. Otherwise thank you for those links which I had not previously read.
1) Because you are a dumbass.
2) See #1.
Africans and Indians are simply a WEAPON you whites use to break and bludgeon other societies into submission. (and societies are an extremely fragile+ delicate thing)
And those 2 are favorite weapon at that(look at Burma even now the US State Department has called it a "Myanmar genocide", right now as i speak Indian invaders aka Rohingya that were imported by the Anglos in the past are being weaponized against the natives of Myanmar and are used to destroy it).And lot can be said about Ukraine but you are the superspreaders of it...this...should I say this.. "malady", it all emanates from the West...the source of poison.
So maybe start changing your laws and people first then? Go after academia, DC state ghouls, and those 'professors" that are creating the little monsters ?The US is already what you would describe as "SJW" since the 60's cultural revolution, and either you scrap America's creed and try something else?(what you should try im not sure). But you guys will continue to carry out your insane mission until the end to save face. To give up on it means to give up on America and everything liberalism stands for, it will mean that it has failed..,Even now with this post you were trying to make whites out of Europeans. wit this "white solidarity" and ideas. A le 56% mutt that doesn’t have any ties with his home country and normal Europeans.Proves time and time again that Whites are some of the greatest enemies of the Europeans. And this isnt some lost rare hidden esoteric lore, this is something even 15 year old Finnish RW' a understand that whites are an enemy.We smaller guys need to be extra careful...a lot of whites look just like us...but instead they will gut you and wear your culture and everything you hold dear like a skinsuit...Replies: @silviosilver
That was a fine diatribe, son. I spoke harshly of your country during its time of greatest adversity, so it’s understandable you’d want to hit back.
However, you’re barking up the wrong tree. While you’re quite correct that all five flavors of Anglo assiduously attempt to negrify the remaining untouched realms of the europshere, they are not doing so in the belief that this debilitates those countries; on the contrary, they are, to varying degrees, convinced it’s a benefit, and in any case, a moral obligation.
As you’re not an anglophone, perhaps the reference wasn’t clear to you. In the unsanitized form I originally proffered it, it was “nigger thy neighbor,” which is a take-off from “beggar thy neighbor” – protectionist economic policies through which countries sought to gain an edge on each other, which resulted in everybody becoming poorer and which are generally blamed for deepening the Great Depression. In competing with each other, if we insist on negrifying our neighbors, we’re all going to end up dumber, uglier, more violent and poorer.
2) See #1.Replies: @songbird
Reich has said “race doesn’t exist.” Maybe, he needs to say it to get access to the DNA, but I don’t need to read it. It is not worth my time, to read things that make progressives comfortable. Give me the version with it cut out. Oh, wait – I already read that version because people were talking about it on HBD blogs before the book was published.
Ukrainians will bring their ethnic antagonisms for Russians, the largest Euro country, outside the GAE powerblock. They'll seriously sabotage any sort of pan-European nationalism, or potential realignment away from America.
When they come, about 30% of the entry numbers, riding the same trains and buses, will be blacks, Indians, and Arabs. You can already see it, in the pictures. Many which are so embarrassing, and counter the narrative, that they have been pulled from government postings.
They are not going to identify with national history. Something like the Cromwellian Conquest or the Easter Rising will be boring to them. The Irish language will be about as interesting as it is to a Nigerian. They won't be blood and soil nationalists; the very idea will make them uncomfortable.
And their discomfort will be a dampening rod, for ethnic nationalists. If your old elementary school is suddenly over half Ukrainian (and that is the sort of thing I have heard) it is seriously going to dampen any national feelings.
Men are encouraged to stay. What the West will be getting is an infusion of pure estrogen, dependent on government handouts. Housing them will raise rents and getting them jobs will depress wages. It will make family formation more difficult. And with the imbalanced sex ratio, it may encourage miscegenation.
Currently, Europe doesn't have any sort of pan-ethnic cultural apparatus. There's a bit of it, buried deep in history, but there is no modern organ to compete with Hollywood, to spread a pan-national message. What they will get is the multicult message of Hollywood.
The younger ones will be fed straight into the public school system, where they will be indoctrinated. They will support refugees. After all, how could they not? It would be hypocritical for them not to, and, more-ever, it wouldn't gain them any victim points - and we live in a culture that elevates victims.
When politicians say "We are an immigrant nation" it will resonate with them, and they will nod their heads in agreement.Replies: @sudden death, @A123, @Coconuts
Thanx for thorough explanation, might return to your stated points sometime later to discuss, just one more thing to be sure about your position in order not to distort it:
If I do understand correctly, it seems so, because you’re surely convinced that no less than 30% out of those roughly 4 million UA refugees so far are non white blacks, Indians, and Arabs?
Or white native slavic Ukrainians themselves are not white enough?
If a pan-reference is needed, I suggest "European" or "Euro", which term I would also apply to pureblood Americans, or Canadians, or Australians, etc.
The trouble with the term "white" is that it has been weaponized. I think it is unsalvageable, at this point, but was also never a good term to start with. Because it doesn't suggest blood and soil, or culture, but surface coloration, like a coat of paint. It feeds too much into the blank-slatist rhetoric. And I think, because of color-signaling, elites automatically consider it a low-class word, so it will stigmatize any movement.
I have often heard it used dripping with vitriol. It doesn't help that it is a one syllable word, and leaps off the tongue of the least facile speakers, like a swear word.
The way that I hear it used in Europe "White British", "White Irish" suggest easy capture of countries. It is extremely obnoxious and the natives should not tolerate it. There is no other kind but "white", therefore it is not necessary to say it. All the others are simply not these things.
BTW, I seem to hear of a lot of Europeans (as in people in Europe) who have mixed identities. Though I like national identities, I'm not even sure that they are workable or will last. I predict that there will be a new ethnogenesis within Europe, where at least certain regions of Europe meld. But, in the short term, it seems to be a danger, because there is nothing to replace national culture. I would say that Europeans stopped having an assertive cultural identity a long time ago, and it is their biggest lack today. I don't even know, if it is possible to center such a thing in Western Europe, as the states have been captured to such an extent that they would probably make operating any cultural production center difficult.Replies: @silviosilver, @Thulean Friend, @Thulean Friend
I would say that the propensity to use one language or another with strangers is similar in Spain-proper to any other country. If you look darker or lighter than the typical Spaniard (who has a rather wide variety of skin tones) the main influence in how people will address you is their own ability to speak another language, which used to be very poor in Spain.
Now, if we're talking about friendliness to foreigners in Spain, there are some curious dynamics at play. Spaniards are more friendly than the average in Europe but people in Madrid and especially in Andalusia are more likely to be hostile to non-Europeans. I've witnessed this with my own eyes. Madrid has a long history of receiving economic migrants from all regions, especially from LATAM and MENA, and have developed their own animosities, including the invention of some ethnic slurs that later spread to other regions of Spain and even to LATAM itself, like sudacas (now being replaced by panchitos) or negratas.
Why Andalusians, arguably the least European region in mainland Spain, have sometimes hostile attitudes to third worlders that were unimaginable at the time in other parts of Spain I have no idea.
In the Basque Country we can be as racist as anyone but, for historical and folkloric reasons, we have always focused our racism on Spaniards, although this is in decline now. Other kind of foreigners are unlikely to experience any rejection, although we are not as extroverted as further south. In fact, non-Europeans would probably find that the Basque Country is quite a welcoming place, apart from the difficult language barrier. I think that this has a lot to do with Basque nationalism having developed strong ties with leftist anti-imperialist movements during the 60s that still linger on. However, I hear that people are getting tired of young Maghrebis committing a very disproportionate amount of misdeeds, including crimes that were unheard of before they arrived in large numbers. Same with Gypsies but those have always been considered a more exotic type of Spaniards.Replies: @Yahya, @silviosilver
The reason I very deliberately worded it the way I did is because that seems to be the reasoning Yahya employed to explain why his mother was addressed in Spanish, but not his father. During his trip to Spain with his parents – evidently a formative racial experience for him – his mother, being light-skinned, was routinely addressed in Spanish, while his father, of a distinctly duskier countenance, had no such luck; and Yahya thus concluded that the reason his mother was addressed in Spanish was that Spaniards thought she was Spanish – otherwise why in the world, he reasoned, would they speak to her in Spanish and not his father?
As we can see in his reply to you, he is sticking with this explanation.
Curiously, it seems to have escaped him that Spain is now (and at the time of his visit) a “land of immigrants” in a way that Egypt isn’t even close to. There are literally millions of people as dark as his father (including actual Arabs) in Spain, yet he’d apparently have us believe that these poor souls are never (or at least seldom) addressed in Spanish by Spaniards.
Or perhaps they are. And Spaniards only refused to speak Spanish to his father, not from any dastardly racist motivations, but because, walking around in a backpack, camera strapped around his neck and an “I heart Barcelona” t-shirt as he surely was, they recognized in him a tourist who, being so dusky, couldn’t possibly know any Spanish.
Or perhaps he has simply never heard of Latin America.
Okay, kidding aside, around 2004-2006 I remember watching this Catalan-language film, which partly revolved around the theme of nativist discrimination towards immigrants. There was a scene in it in which this very obvious Arab (I think he might have even been wearing a “fez” or whatever they call it, without the tassel) was ordering a pizza at the counter, and the girl at the counter was about to serve him when the movie’s female protagonist walked in the shop, and the counter-girl immediately ditched the Arab to go serve her. My thinking was that’s a bit over the top, would anyone really be that rude? Well, I think it’s a bit unlikely, but at the time that film was made (late 90s I’m guessing) I can’t for sure they wouldn’t.
I’ve heard of that. Also the Portuguese version for Brazilian immigrants – brazuca. I suppose they sound different to Iberian ears, but for insults, to me those terms sound kinda cool. If I were of that provenance, I would attempt to ‘own’ them, the way blacks do with ‘nigga’.
That quote seems out of context (please provide a link to the reference). As usual, you are opining on a topic from a position of superficial knowledge and (political) prejudice. I read his book all the way through and he didn’t come across as a race denialist. He merely states (correctly) that modern day races are a mixture of several strands of past populations. While he does hedge his statements by genuflecting to progressive ideals, he’s publicly and adamantly refuted Lewontin’s argument that racial differences are superficial and trivial. Here’s a quote from his NYT article “How Genetics Is Changing Our Understanding of ‘Race’”:
He also admits that traits differ across human populations (viz. races), and that these differences are influenced by genetic variations.
Where he makes erroneous statements is when he touches on racial differences in IQ. But that he is wrong on one topic should not discredit his whole body of work. Khan, Sailer and Cochran understand this.
Many HBD blogs rely on Reich’s work. His findings were published in journals long before the book was out. You may as well go to the primary source for information.
I think Greg Cochran touched on this in his review: https://westhunt.wordpress.com/2018/03/29/who-we-are-1/
He's no Gould or Lewontin - I recognize that. And I sympathize with the desire to avoid a crazy mob with torches howling for his blood, pouring strange liquids over him, or shouting him down. That's happened to others, like Murray and Lynn, and such would probably made his work impossible.
But, honestly, it is very tedious to need to read through such disclaimers. To a certain extent, they are boiler-plate, if the author didn't put them in the publisher probably would.
Yet, I'm not sure how useful they are. Nicholas Wade put them in his book and he was still somewhat unpersoned. Charles Murray is usually very careful about what he says, and has said some very progressive things, though he is still a very controversial figure.
I wish it would be separated out, cocentrated in a skippable foreward.Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
by Iain McGilchrist
Reviewed by the Iraqi Information Minister
I read this book a couple years ago on the recommendation of Gary Lachman. Gary Lachman is a writer I sometimes enjoy reading. I have read 4 or 5 of his books, mostly cover to cover. He gives this McGilchrist book his highest recommendation. Like everybody should read this book.
Gary is mistaken.
This book is deeply flawed. I do not have time to write and you do not have time to read more than a small fraction of my arguments why. I will make this as brief as possible.
The bibliography is 60 pages long and the font is 4 point type. I picked one page to count the number of books. This page had 40 books on it. So the author has 2400 separate books in his bibliography. This is evidence that there is a fraud at the core here but I sure am not going to accuse I. M. of being a fraud. (On a side note there are also 50 pages of endnotes. 4 point type.)
Analogy. This experiment would be expensive for one guy but if you have a discretionary research budget you might like to have a go at it. If so you may consider this a Free Idea. Go to the finest restaurant in your city. In New Orleans this might be Commander's Palace and that would be a good choice but choose any one. Now there are only a couple-three short steps in this proc.
I. Get one of everything on their dinner menu, to go.
II. Take the stack of to-go styrofoam containers, all 100-300 of them, to your van and proceed directly to your laboratory.
III. Pour the contents of all 100-300 containers into a huge mixing bowl. You will need approximately the volume of a pot that a Borneo cannibal could use to boil a missionary. Lots of liters.
III. Stir really really really well. Like the 2nd or 3rd top speed on your kitchen top blender like you are making a protein + supplement drink for your workout.
IV. What have you got?
Something analagous to the textual product in The Master and His Emissary is what you will have got.
There are some very good bits in this book. This is not a good book.Replies: @Barbarossa
I’ve got it coming my way, since I picked up a copy cheap. We shall see, but thanks for the critical review in the meantime.
Whereas my Egyptian mother and sister look more like this:https://www.enigma-mag.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Ms.-Jude-Benhalim-Ms.-Rana-El-Adem-Yosra-El-Lozy-Ms.-Jenan-Benhalim.jpg
To me, this behavioral pattern was very understandable. Here in Egypt, there are a fair number of English and French expats around, and as far as I've seen no Egyptian speaks to them in Arabic as if they thought they understood the language. Because it would be non-sensical to do so. Just as it would be non-sensical for a Spaniard to speak to an Arabian-looking tourist in Spanish. Silviosilver has difficulties comprehending all this. But then he is an ignoramus who thinks a Southern European population like Iberians are mostly "indistinguishable from Northern Europeans".Replies: @silviosilver
Did I really say that? As I recall, I was talking about being surprised to learn how northern European most Spaniards are, and that this portion of the population is “largely” indistinguishable from their western cousins farther north. Of course, even this softer statement turns on one’s understanding of “largely.” If someone is of a ‘microracialist’ persuasion, then I suppose he would protest angrily at my characterization. If not, he’d probably find it reasonable. As for the population of ethnic Spaniards as a whole, no, of course I wouldn’t say they’re indistinguishable from northern Europeans. That’s just silly. Place representative groups of each side by side and nobody would have the slightest difficult distinguishing them.
Of course, I would stand by the claim they are vastly more similar to northern Europeans than to Arabs. It’s only the balkans – and even then, the more southerly regions of it – that one could claim have more in common with the middle east, or the Levant anyway, than they do to northern Europe. Genes supposedly tell a different story, but for all practical purposes race means looks, and if not looks then nothing. (That is, if we all looked the same but differed just as much as we do today in genes, race would be sociopolitically inert.)
Or white native slavic Ukrainians themselves are not white enough?Replies: @songbird
Honestly, I’m an outlier, but I don’t like it when Americans use the term “white.” (I may occasionally do it myself, but I am trying to break the habit.) But when Europeans use it, it breaks my heart.
If a pan-reference is needed, I suggest “European” or “Euro”, which term I would also apply to pureblood Americans, or Canadians, or Australians, etc.
The trouble with the term “white” is that it has been weaponized. I think it is unsalvageable, at this point, but was also never a good term to start with. Because it doesn’t suggest blood and soil, or culture, but surface coloration, like a coat of paint. It feeds too much into the blank-slatist rhetoric. And I think, because of color-signaling, elites automatically consider it a low-class word, so it will stigmatize any movement.
I have often heard it used dripping with vitriol. It doesn’t help that it is a one syllable word, and leaps off the tongue of the least facile speakers, like a swear word.
The way that I hear it used in Europe “White British”, “White Irish” suggest easy capture of countries. It is extremely obnoxious and the natives should not tolerate it. There is no other kind but “white”, therefore it is not necessary to say it. All the others are simply not these things.
BTW, I seem to hear of a lot of Europeans (as in people in Europe) who have mixed identities. Though I like national identities, I’m not even sure that they are workable or will last. I predict that there will be a new ethnogenesis within Europe, where at least certain regions of Europe meld. But, in the short term, it seems to be a danger, because there is nothing to replace national culture. I would say that Europeans stopped having an assertive cultural identity a long time ago, and it is their biggest lack today. I don’t even know, if it is possible to center such a thing in Western Europe, as the states have been captured to such an extent that they would probably make operating any cultural production center difficult.
When I was a kid, it was understood by all that a real Australian was of British provenance (or as is more common nowadays, "Anglo-Celtic"). That's just what an "Australian" was. They were the only people who would proudly call themselves "Aussie." In the mouths of the immigrant community (including what in America are termed "white ethnics"), that term took on a different, oftentimes negative, meaning (in the latter case, usually prefixed by the adjective "fucking"), but in all instances signifying the Other.
Then some fifteen or twenty years ago, certainly not earlier than that, I began to hear young people, who I would have simply described the old way - Australian - describing themselves as English. While it was fairly common before this to hear people say I'm Scottish, or I'm Irish, the only times you'd hear someone saying English was if he was actually born in England and still had the accent. It didn't take a genius to figure out what had happened - the multicultists hadn't gotten their mitts on them. At the time I was still mostly apolitical, and I didn't read too much significance into it. It's just a way of being 'more inclusive', I thought; unnecessary, uncalled for, but no biggie. How wrong I was.
The multicultists would presumably have a harder time of it in Europe - the land is ancient, soaked in history - but they're nothing if not persistent. Unless there is heated resistance - and if there isn't, it had better start soon - they will eventually get their way there too. Once an entire generation has been indoctrinated, feeble protests from "my old racist uncle" can be summarily dismissed.
I meant it more as a paraphrase than a quote, and I think it is true on that basis. For one thing, he has put quotation marks around “race.” It seems to me that he is one of those guys trying to use “population” as a replacement. IMO, it is kind of a weaselly word meant to obfuscate.
I think Greg Cochran touched on this in his review:
https://westhunt.wordpress.com/2018/03/29/who-we-are-1/
He’s no Gould or Lewontin – I recognize that. And I sympathize with the desire to avoid a crazy mob with torches howling for his blood, pouring strange liquids over him, or shouting him down. That’s happened to others, like Murray and Lynn, and such would probably made his work impossible.
But, honestly, it is very tedious to need to read through such disclaimers. To a certain extent, they are boiler-plate, if the author didn’t put them in the publisher probably would.
Yet, I’m not sure how useful they are. Nicholas Wade put them in his book and he was still somewhat unpersoned. Charles Murray is usually very careful about what he says, and has said some very progressive things, though he is still a very controversial figure.
I wish it would be separated out, cocentrated in a skippable foreward.
Richard Nixon obviously didn't ever see David Reich in action.
If a pan-reference is needed, I suggest "European" or "Euro", which term I would also apply to pureblood Americans, or Canadians, or Australians, etc.
The trouble with the term "white" is that it has been weaponized. I think it is unsalvageable, at this point, but was also never a good term to start with. Because it doesn't suggest blood and soil, or culture, but surface coloration, like a coat of paint. It feeds too much into the blank-slatist rhetoric. And I think, because of color-signaling, elites automatically consider it a low-class word, so it will stigmatize any movement.
I have often heard it used dripping with vitriol. It doesn't help that it is a one syllable word, and leaps off the tongue of the least facile speakers, like a swear word.
The way that I hear it used in Europe "White British", "White Irish" suggest easy capture of countries. It is extremely obnoxious and the natives should not tolerate it. There is no other kind but "white", therefore it is not necessary to say it. All the others are simply not these things.
BTW, I seem to hear of a lot of Europeans (as in people in Europe) who have mixed identities. Though I like national identities, I'm not even sure that they are workable or will last. I predict that there will be a new ethnogenesis within Europe, where at least certain regions of Europe meld. But, in the short term, it seems to be a danger, because there is nothing to replace national culture. I would say that Europeans stopped having an assertive cultural identity a long time ago, and it is their biggest lack today. I don't even know, if it is possible to center such a thing in Western Europe, as the states have been captured to such an extent that they would probably make operating any cultural production center difficult.Replies: @silviosilver, @Thulean Friend, @Thulean Friend
The problem is it’s not being imposed on them by outsiders, but by their own elites – enthusiastically by one portion, and reluctantly but obediently by the other. They thus fail to identify it as an attempt to undermine their identity. I’m afraid there’s a very limited window of opportunity for action on this front, one which in America and the dominions is, for all intents and purposes, effectively shut.
When I was a kid, it was understood by all that a real Australian was of British provenance (or as is more common nowadays, “Anglo-Celtic”). That’s just what an “Australian” was. They were the only people who would proudly call themselves “Aussie.” In the mouths of the immigrant community (including what in America are termed “white ethnics”), that term took on a different, oftentimes negative, meaning (in the latter case, usually prefixed by the adjective “fucking”), but in all instances signifying the Other.
Then some fifteen or twenty years ago, certainly not earlier than that, I began to hear young people, who I would have simply described the old way – Australian – describing themselves as English. While it was fairly common before this to hear people say I’m Scottish, or I’m Irish, the only times you’d hear someone saying English was if he was actually born in England and still had the accent. It didn’t take a genius to figure out what had happened – the multicultists hadn’t gotten their mitts on them. At the time I was still mostly apolitical, and I didn’t read too much significance into it. It’s just a way of being ‘more inclusive’, I thought; unnecessary, uncalled for, but no biggie. How wrong I was.
The multicultists would presumably have a harder time of it in Europe – the land is ancient, soaked in history – but they’re nothing if not persistent. Unless there is heated resistance – and if there isn’t, it had better start soon – they will eventually get their way there too. Once an entire generation has been indoctrinated, feeble protests from “my old racist uncle” can be summarily dismissed.
Well, I don’t think I can contribute much to this discussion. I don’t have any firm opinion on the accuracy or implications of this anecdote that he’s told us several times. Perhaps, given his confessed fascination with phenotypical matters, he just read too much in whatever happened during that trip.
I only hope that they all had a good time visiting the land of El Cid and Almanzor.
What I found cool was hearing Chileans accuse one another of being a sudaca. In this context, the term refers to backward characteristics they wish people in their country didn’t have.
https://academiacontacto.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/spaniards-in-the-world.jpg
Amal Clooney, the modal Levantine phenotype:
https://dilei.it/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2019/11/gettyimages-1161357065-2.jpg?w=670&h=377&quality=70&strip=all&crop=1
Kate Winslet, the modal British phenotype:
https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BZGE4ZmNjNDQtYmE2My00MTg3LTg3NDEtZTA2MzhhMTk2MDlmXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyNTgzNDU0ODY@._V1_.jpg
Unless I'm blind, Cruz appears to me far closer to Amal than Kate. And I bet juxtaposing a series of Spanish actresses with Lebanese and English actresses would mostly lead to the same outcome.Replies: @Yevardian, @silviosilver, @Mikel
But "judgement" itself is also a form of cowardice, though lesser than more obvious ways of lying to yourself.
Judgement stems from not "understanding." If you truly understand, you'll see how the other is unable to be any different at the moment. They are truly trying their best, even when they don't realise it, which is possible because eople are multi-layered, and they are often unacquainted with the deeper parts of themselves.
Having said this, a lack of understanding of "the other" is not enough to cause such judgement. The "judge" also needs to "suffer" from a surplus of "pride."
For example, I often don't understand why people are as they are, especially if I don't know them, but I appreciate that, because I don't know them, I have less information on them than they do, and so I am in too informationally limited a place to judge.
In other words, the courage of having humility also lessens judgement.
Another key point is that "pure love" is "understanding." Or perhaps pure understanding is love.
So while it is true that no one honest can claim to love everyone, as we are not God undivided, we can still accept the fact that without loving the other we are not in a place to judge and also accept that when we do love another, truly, in the moment, we necessarily do not judge them.
And of course, as with all these things, we can substitute our inner selves for "the other" and the words apply equally.
In fact, this attitude needs to be turned inwards first, for so many.
Continuing, this doesn't all mean that we can't say "good" and "bad", but it does mean that our preferences, our dislikes and likes are not to be confused with some moral objectivity. We should not speak in God's voice, though we can sing along with our own tune, should we be able to harmonise.
Furthermore, when using "good" and "bad" non-judgementally, which is with love, we are seeing the world from the the other's perspective as much as our own and are then trying to untangle their contradictions, rather than admonishing them. To point them in the direction of freedom from their fear, rather than forcing them along the road or telling them that it is hopeless and that they have failed.
For example, you can see my harsh comments in many places on this board, but I honestly believe, that even the harshest and seemingly most childish, come from a place of non-judgementalism.
They are instead to remind, or even shock, the people on the receiving end that they are caught in their own contradictions and that their self-judgement, which is usually what causes those contradictions to tangle up, is undermining their deeper needs.
And the only way you can know this of another is to take on their pain and feel it, as you can only truly know what you experience.
And so, by feeling it, no matter how abrasive the language, you are sharing in their problem and thereby making it your own as well. Which puts you in a place to suggest, even meanly, but never to judge, for you are there with them.
This is understanding and encouragement, and does not push distance with "the other" but makes an intimacy.
It also brings you back to yourself, for now you understand where you too are at, better, and will be more at peace.
I am not a relativist, even though I think morality is a simplistic semi-fiction.
Ultimately, morality is just people doing their best to try to understand and describe what is in their heart, but with much loss of truth, when it would be more accurate if they could simply see and follow their heart, but they cannot yet for they are gripped with fear.
Rather tragically this fear is often caused by the brokenness of morality when trying to describe truth, though it can also be because they have fear and no simple handrails of morality to guide them while they learn.
There is no easy answer for how people can arrive at truth and clear-sightedness, but all people will, in their own way. Every path will be individual, just as every individual is key to supporting others. This is not relativism. It is understanding, love and the beauty of existence. Doing your best is never "bad", even if it involves doing "bad." It is just yet another step on the path to "better," and everything would be very boring and uninformative if there was only "perfect" and no "better".
As we only know what we experience, so this world is valuable in its awfulness, its misery and its suffering. On a timescale of infinity, what really do these things matter, except we get to learn them? Even though they therefore matter infinitely, because we have the wondrous fulfillment of learning them!Replies: @silviosilver, @Barbarossa
Thanks much for the eloquent reply. I got quite busy for a few days, so I apologize for not getting back sooner.
I think that it is possible for people to choose a better path and that they are not necessarily doing the best they can in any given moment. Speaking personally, there are plenty of times when I feel the pull toward the lazy way or destructive way and choose otherwise. Or sometimes not as the case may be. We are habitual creatures heavily shaped by our experiences so it becomes very easy to fall into behavioral ruts, whether for good or bad. The path is laid by countless small choices that nudge us one way or another. I see human behavior as something of a flywheel; it operates on momentum but it is possible to slow the wheel or even change direction given enough impetus after the other directional motion slows and stops. I do believe that we have agency though, though usually progress in any direction is a very incremental process of tiny choices.
I understand your points on judgement and would agree that it is important to not fall into the trap of judging people. I don’t think that it is possible to call any individual evil, for example, be it Hitler or Stalin. It is however possible to say that their actions</i were bad. So I would say that there is a critical difference between having compassion for even the most twisted individual and so refraining from judgement of them and being able to judge their actions.
But sadly, I do not agree with the idea that all people are on their individual path to truth and clear sightedness. Too often people are on a path of doubling down on poor decisions and blindness. Unless you are speaking about the possibility of reincarnation or the trans migration of souls. In this lifetime anyhow, there are many who will many who will probably and sometimes willfully not learn a thing. Perhaps this will be a lesson in itself if they come back around.
On your own comments to be quite honest, I often get the feeling that you are projecting a persona of being "above it all" so that you can slag people with some impunity. However, this is just my impression and I don't count it as definitive. Perhaps you really do believe yourself to be saying some things from a position of "love", though in my experience such confrontational approaches only harden the undesirable mental attitude. I put even less store in the impressions gathered of people on the internet than in real life since it is a very one dimensional and deceptive format, so I make no real judgement of you or any other commenter here as a person. I just have the impressions I accrue, which I take with an appropriate grain of salt.
However, to get back to the basis of what started this existential discussion it baffles me as to how curtly calling AaronB "soulless" and criticizing his personal search for truth and meaning is supposed to be edifying in any way. And at the heart of it all, it is possible to not judge people or human organizations for the terrible and destructive choices that they may make without seemingly condoning it as "natural" or "good".
How many Chechens are now no longer among the living?
Expending an expendable population subgroup is very “Killer” KGB. That seems like his true, personal devotion.
PEACE 😇
Clownworld should collapse on it's own stupid contradictions eventually, so there's hope, but I don't have any illusions it's going to be pretty in the meantime.Replies: @silviosilver
I cannot honestly claim to have been personally affected it by it much. If I were to list the ways it’s touched my life, you could rightly dismiss it as tantamount to some libtard bitterly complaining that the grocery fails to carry his favorite brand of premium sea salt (or whatever their sophisticated palates require these days). If I had to judge only by what I experience in my day to day life, clownworld would be but a faint outline on the horizon.
Still, life is a struggle, and we struggle for the purpose getting somewhere, somewhere better than where we were yesterday, both as individuals and as societies. It’s when I think about where we’re going to be tomorrow, collectively, that I feel most disheartened. From my perspective, we’re beavering away to create societies that very few us will actually want to live in. There are plenty who believe they will want to, of course, but in my estimate, very few who actually will. It’ll just be more ‘facts on the ground’ that it’s now tragically ‘too late’ to do anything about except grudgingly accept and work around as necessary.
Ukrainians will bring their ethnic antagonisms for Russians, the largest Euro country, outside the GAE powerblock. They'll seriously sabotage any sort of pan-European nationalism, or potential realignment away from America.
When they come, about 30% of the entry numbers, riding the same trains and buses, will be blacks, Indians, and Arabs. You can already see it, in the pictures. Many which are so embarrassing, and counter the narrative, that they have been pulled from government postings.
They are not going to identify with national history. Something like the Cromwellian Conquest or the Easter Rising will be boring to them. The Irish language will be about as interesting as it is to a Nigerian. They won't be blood and soil nationalists; the very idea will make them uncomfortable.
And their discomfort will be a dampening rod, for ethnic nationalists. If your old elementary school is suddenly over half Ukrainian (and that is the sort of thing I have heard) it is seriously going to dampen any national feelings.
Men are encouraged to stay. What the West will be getting is an infusion of pure estrogen, dependent on government handouts. Housing them will raise rents and getting them jobs will depress wages. It will make family formation more difficult. And with the imbalanced sex ratio, it may encourage miscegenation.
Currently, Europe doesn't have any sort of pan-ethnic cultural apparatus. There's a bit of it, buried deep in history, but there is no modern organ to compete with Hollywood, to spread a pan-national message. What they will get is the multicult message of Hollywood.
The younger ones will be fed straight into the public school system, where they will be indoctrinated. They will support refugees. After all, how could they not? It would be hypocritical for them not to, and, more-ever, it wouldn't gain them any victim points - and we live in a culture that elevates victims.
When politicians say "We are an immigrant nation" it will resonate with them, and they will nod their heads in agreement.Replies: @sudden death, @A123, @Coconuts
I think you just explained Germany’s future: (1)
GR’s fatalism about the future of Germany is very understandable.
The Maastricht Treaty concept of Schengen, unlimited migration within the EU, makes it much harder for sovereign European nations to resist the even more destructive MENA origin migrants.
We have had 20 years of EU “mixing”. Is Europe better off?
I do not see it. Intra-EU migration has been bad for TFR in the ‘donor’ nations. And, suppressed authentic citizen wages in the ‘recipient’ countries. MegaCorporations won, people lost.
PEACE 😇
__________
(1)’https://gatesofvienna.net/2022/04/migrants-r-us/
One could also construct a sort of philosophical argument, based on past history, when national borders were relatively closed. It was a much simpler model - it should have been easier to get right. But there was an incredible imbalance caused by urbanization.
Rural areas became almost deserted. People went into cities, and then these were drained too and became merely feeder stocks for super-cities, like London or Paris, areas totally devoid of rootedness, pulling the most talented from across the country, and pooling them together in the most dynamic place economically, but the absolutely worst place to have children.
If we could not work out the kinks of this model, to find the right balance of rootedness, then it was a special sort of hubris to pursue a greater movement of peoples across national boundaries.Replies: @A123
The best way sanctions on Russia will backfire is how regular Russians will permanently rally around the flag, even after some economic concessions are thrown at them when Russian-Western relationship thaws years later.
As sanctions cuts into their pockets, their anger and resentment will be coped with by pinning the sanctions onto the West (true). They will learn to believe that the West wants them to be poor and have a life-long and generational grudge against the West for this – what led to bottom-up Islamization in Iran and Palestine once the hardship hit. This time it would be Orthodox Russian Nationalism in the person of Putin and his successors. What was set by some tradcon nationalists become genuinely professed by a large part of the population, better than what Soviets could do.
Gracias amigo. It was a most enjoyable trip.
I see you wish to relitigate an argument you previously lost. You are in luck, because I am always keen on phenotypic discussions, so will indulge you, even though I know I already won (because reality is on my side).
Yes that is what you said:
I then refuted your statement by posting a representative sample of Spaniards juxtaposed by the Swedish and Syrian national soccer teams; in which any unbiased observer could clearly see that Spaniards are closer in appearance to Syrians than Swedes. Incidentally, you did not reply to that post, instead choosing to latch onto my jokes and throwaway lines. LatW did reply however, meekly suggesting that a full two members of the Spanish team could pass for Swedes, whereas I could spot 5-6 who could pass for Syrians.
But I think I can balance this argument by saying maybe both of us are right (me more than you though). Spanish phenotypes range from quasi-Nordic to quasi-Levantine, and the difficulty lies in determining what percentage of Spaniards fall in each category. My contention is that Spaniards tend more towards Levantines, you towards Northern Europeans. Dmitry – perhaps an unbiased an observer as they come – agrees more with me.
Perhaps Mikel can add his two cents.
Here’s another way to put it.
This is Penelope Cruz, which to me has the “modal Spaniard” phenotype.
Amal Clooney, the modal Levantine phenotype:
Kate Winslet, the modal British phenotype:
Unless I’m blind, Cruz appears to me far closer to Amal than Kate. And I bet juxtaposing a series of Spanish actresses with Lebanese and English actresses would mostly lead to the same outcome.
Are you familiar with this fine website sir?
It's a fun stupid parlour game to try classifying yourself, friends and acquaintances with it, anyway. A while ago, I remember someone told me I looked a lot like Vadislav Surkov, except much better looking (of course). I'm not sure I've ever been so insulted in my life.Replies: @Yahya
From my earlier post that you quoted here: The straightforward reading of that is that there was a certain proportion of Spaniards - put aside how large that proportion is for now - that were "invisible" to me, because they didn't bear traits my mind commonly associated with Spaniards. They were there all along, simply going about their business being Spaniards, but I didn't register them as such. It is this select subset of Spaniards I claimed were - at least to me - "largely indistinguishable from northern Europeans". I doubt anyone besides you who read those words would have concluded I was referring to all Spaniards with that remark. What makes Dmitry any less biased than me? I'm not cashing checks on how "northern" Spaniards are perceived to be. If you (and apparently Dmitry) are correct, I'm happy to hear it - it means there are more people who bear family resemblance to me in that part of the world than I figured.
But there's another question we might ask: is Dmitry even qualified to make such a determination? In my experience, part of the reason that anti-racists like him are anti-racists is because their racial perceptions are dulled, so on this basis alone I'd be inclined discount his testimony. And how much effort did he actually put into his estimates? I doubt he was walking around with notepad and pen, tallying the "types" he encountered, as though on a fact-finding mission. He probably wasn't even thinking about it until the topic came up on this forum, at which point he scratched his head and, never one lost for words, decided to deliver his verdict. I don't think so, but have it your way.
And in which case, damn, it's no wonder Spaniards were lining up to talk to your mother. Who is this aryan goddess who has deigned to alight upon our benighted shores, they wondered in awe. And who be the blackamoor accompanying her, the likes of which hath not been seen in our land? That, they agreed, must be her manservant; surely such a creature Spanish speaketh not.
(That is a joke, dude, RELAX.)
I do wonder though, is that her most representative pic, or was it tendentiously selected to help you make your point? Because dunno man, when I search google images for her name, virtually every pic that appears has her looking better than that. (Not a world of difference, by any means, but pic comparisons are a game of shades and subtleties, as I'm sure you're aware...)
Though, to be perfectly honest with you, this may be the first time I enjoy listening to a piece of Arab music. I generally find it too exotic and repetitive for my ears. This song, on the other hand, sounds very refined and melodic. Much better actually than the Andalusian folk music I'm familiar with.Replies: @Yahya
Using “The Beautiful People”, such as actresses and models, as a reference is a bit problematic as a concept. Such individuals are often quite distinct from the larger common population. How closely do popular TelaNovela, Mexican actresses resemble Mexican women?
To me, Cruz most closely resembles Selena Gomez [MORE]. Cruz does not resemble either Clooney or Winslet. The later two have tall, skinny oval faces.
PEACE 😇
https://filmitamasha.com/selena-gomez-photos/
The Maastricht Treaty concept of Schengen, unlimited migration within the EU, makes it much harder for sovereign European nations to resist the even more destructive MENA origin migrants.
We have had 20 years of EU "mixing". Is Europe better off?
I do not see it. Intra-EU migration has been bad for TFR in the 'donor' nations. And, suppressed authentic citizen wages in the 'recipient' countries. MegaCorporations won, people lost.
PEACE 😇
__________
(1)'https://gatesofvienna.net/2022/04/migrants-r-us/Replies: @songbird
I agree.
One could also construct a sort of philosophical argument, based on past history, when national borders were relatively closed. It was a much simpler model – it should have been easier to get right. But there was an incredible imbalance caused by urbanization.
Rural areas became almost deserted. People went into cities, and then these were drained too and became merely feeder stocks for super-cities, like London or Paris, areas totally devoid of rootedness, pulling the most talented from across the country, and pooling them together in the most dynamic place economically, but the absolutely worst place to have children.
If we could not work out the kinks of this model, to find the right balance of rootedness, then it was a special sort of hubris to pursue a greater movement of peoples across national boundaries.
I do not know that thus will necessarily lead to "rootedness", however it is much more appealing for family raising and life "balance".
___
Politically, aggressive "Blue" city life being replaced by more civilized "Red" suburban life is clearly win. The puppeteers running the current U.S. regime want gasoline to continue to surge in price as it makes suburban life more difficult. The key to successful migration is assimilation. This places objective limits on the number and quality of those let in.
It is outright malice, not hubris, driving Globalists to exceed the maximum assimilation rate. Destruction of nationality is among their objectives. How else can they achieve their dream of SJW Islamic unification under UN/NWO rule?
PEACE 😇Replies: @songbird
https://academiacontacto.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/spaniards-in-the-world.jpg
Amal Clooney, the modal Levantine phenotype:
https://dilei.it/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2019/11/gettyimages-1161357065-2.jpg?w=670&h=377&quality=70&strip=all&crop=1
Kate Winslet, the modal British phenotype:
https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BZGE4ZmNjNDQtYmE2My00MTg3LTg3NDEtZTA2MzhhMTk2MDlmXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyNTgzNDU0ODY@._V1_.jpg
Unless I'm blind, Cruz appears to me far closer to Amal than Kate. And I bet juxtaposing a series of Spanish actresses with Lebanese and English actresses would mostly lead to the same outcome.Replies: @Yevardian, @silviosilver, @Mikel
http://humanphenotypes.net/basic/Orientalid.html
Are you familiar with this fine website sir?
It’s a fun stupid parlour game to try classifying yourself, friends and acquaintances with it, anyway. A while ago, I remember someone told me I looked a lot like Vadislav Surkov, except much better looking (of course). I’m not sure I’ve ever been so insulted in my life.
If a pan-reference is needed, I suggest "European" or "Euro", which term I would also apply to pureblood Americans, or Canadians, or Australians, etc.
The trouble with the term "white" is that it has been weaponized. I think it is unsalvageable, at this point, but was also never a good term to start with. Because it doesn't suggest blood and soil, or culture, but surface coloration, like a coat of paint. It feeds too much into the blank-slatist rhetoric. And I think, because of color-signaling, elites automatically consider it a low-class word, so it will stigmatize any movement.
I have often heard it used dripping with vitriol. It doesn't help that it is a one syllable word, and leaps off the tongue of the least facile speakers, like a swear word.
The way that I hear it used in Europe "White British", "White Irish" suggest easy capture of countries. It is extremely obnoxious and the natives should not tolerate it. There is no other kind but "white", therefore it is not necessary to say it. All the others are simply not these things.
BTW, I seem to hear of a lot of Europeans (as in people in Europe) who have mixed identities. Though I like national identities, I'm not even sure that they are workable or will last. I predict that there will be a new ethnogenesis within Europe, where at least certain regions of Europe meld. But, in the short term, it seems to be a danger, because there is nothing to replace national culture. I would say that Europeans stopped having an assertive cultural identity a long time ago, and it is their biggest lack today. I don't even know, if it is possible to center such a thing in Western Europe, as the states have been captured to such an extent that they would probably make operating any cultural production center difficult.Replies: @silviosilver, @Thulean Friend, @Thulean Friend
In Sweden, we call the native Swedish population “ethnic Swedes”. This used to be somewhat controversial 10-15 years ago when blank slatist ideology was even stronger than it is now. I recall Fredrik Reinfeldt using it offhand and he got into a lot of trouble for doing so, which is ironic given his immigration track record.
But the problem arises when you have lots of other European ethnicities living in the same space, often intermixing. You may not like the term “white” but I dislike terms like “German-American” even more. Especially when such people are usually very rarely fully German by blood and even less likely to speak German or have any real affiliation with the identity. It becomes a fake LARP.
Worse, you get an endless proliferation of fake ethnicities with no grounding. To what end? It’s in this context that the term white becomes a convenient catch-all term that may not be perfect, but it correctly encapsulates the fact that all these European petty ethnicities share far more in common with each other than other groups in the US.
The same process is now underway, albeit more slowly, in many Western European countries. Ironically it’s the far-left that is introducing it here in Sweden, by grouping all disparate European groups together into a larger white whole. Hilariously, I’ve even seen it in action within moslem settings where brown/black moslems accuse Bosnians, Albanians and even some light-skinned Syrians of “white privilege”.
All of which has the effect on consolidating various European minorities into a larger white whole. The only part of Europe where it remains more relevant to talk of ethnic identity rather than race is Eastern Europe given their homogeneity. But that too, I suspect, will slowly change over the coming decades.
I'd like to visit then, while I can understand your Hindu hatred of Sikhs - it's pointless.
Sikhs have 'assimilated' into Liberalism - as a privileged class.
State support of Sikhi is only growing not receding so.. :shrug:
ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ
I always thought that they were lying. But, in fact, they were telling the truth. They existed at least into the '90s, maybe, the 2000s. Though I doubt they are still there now. One of my regrets is not visiting them.
Well, technically, I suppose you could say they still exist, if you count the Amish or Mennonites. You can even hear it in Mexico, which, for me, would be a meta-experience. But I'm not sure how similar Plautdietsch is to modern German. We shall need to get GR to listen to it, and tell us.Replies: @sher singh, @Emil Nikola Richard
If a pan-reference is needed, I suggest "European" or "Euro", which term I would also apply to pureblood Americans, or Canadians, or Australians, etc.
The trouble with the term "white" is that it has been weaponized. I think it is unsalvageable, at this point, but was also never a good term to start with. Because it doesn't suggest blood and soil, or culture, but surface coloration, like a coat of paint. It feeds too much into the blank-slatist rhetoric. And I think, because of color-signaling, elites automatically consider it a low-class word, so it will stigmatize any movement.
I have often heard it used dripping with vitriol. It doesn't help that it is a one syllable word, and leaps off the tongue of the least facile speakers, like a swear word.
The way that I hear it used in Europe "White British", "White Irish" suggest easy capture of countries. It is extremely obnoxious and the natives should not tolerate it. There is no other kind but "white", therefore it is not necessary to say it. All the others are simply not these things.
BTW, I seem to hear of a lot of Europeans (as in people in Europe) who have mixed identities. Though I like national identities, I'm not even sure that they are workable or will last. I predict that there will be a new ethnogenesis within Europe, where at least certain regions of Europe meld. But, in the short term, it seems to be a danger, because there is nothing to replace national culture. I would say that Europeans stopped having an assertive cultural identity a long time ago, and it is their biggest lack today. I don't even know, if it is possible to center such a thing in Western Europe, as the states have been captured to such an extent that they would probably make operating any cultural production center difficult.Replies: @silviosilver, @Thulean Friend, @Thulean Friend
A lot of people have this mentality, which is why some folks spend all their days trying to come up with new terminology in order to escape the previous stigma.
This mentality ultimately fails, because it shows a fundamental cowardice. The stigma is not present because of a specific word but because of a specific identity.
I’ve mentioned before that while I am not particularly sympathetic to any kind of racial identity politics, it needs to be said that there is anti-white bigotry in the West and it needs to be called out like any other form of racism. This does not happen, and in fact it’s often encouraged, which merely underlines the fact that it exists.
So instead of dealing with this, you get these attempts to weasel oneself out of the situation by switching terminology, naively thinking it will make one iota of difference. It won’t.
People who are successful share one thing in common: they are willing to confront any stigma head-on and break it. Whether it was homosexuals in the 1960s (who never tried to change words like homosexual and in fact even playfully adopted words like fag) or even the early Christians. It fundamentally takes courage to change social norms. In the process of doing so, you must challenge, rather than assuage, ruling elites.
Appealing to the established group from where the stigma comes from makes no sense: they have their bigotry for their own reasons. They must be shaken from it, not reasoned with – much less appeased.
"Consumers" is perhaps the most offensive of all to my sensibilities since it sounds like a PC way to say worthless leach ,while retarded is the least offensive since it is just an unvarnished technical term to describe a relative mental capacity.
Naturally enough, any of the terms can be utilized as a slur by those with the desire to do so. Changing the term did nothing to modify reality or the unfortunate fact that some people will always enjoy insulting those less capable than themselves.
As you argue, it's the same with the term white. You can come up with any term that you want and it won't change the goals or the desired power dynamic of those in power.Replies: @silviosilver
Words have power because they are tied to ideas. He who controls the memes, controls the universe.
It is easy to see and appreciate in countless examples. If "sodomite" was still the only word used - not homosexual, not gay, not this long, ridiculous string - do you really think that gays would have so much power?
With regard to blacks, the euphemism treadmill may not have changed their innate qualities, but you make a logical error, if you suppose that is all that matters.
What matters is power, and it certainly has helped increase their power levels. Each change (with the latest to capitalize the "B" in "black", note that it is asymmetrical, "white" is still "white", because each change is power ) is an acknowledgement of their power. They have been moved away from essentialist words - Nigger and (and the formerly very polite) Negro - and moved towards blank-slatist words. "Black", which even I feel I must use, as it wouldn't do to get in the habit of using another word. And the ridiculous seven syllable word "African-American" which is an exercise in humiliation, meant to be difficult to say and thus difficult to use, an obstacle to speaking truths about them.
"White" is a word that was employed before we realized we are at war. When the other side starts coming at you with rolling artillery barrages, you better not stick with a straight line trench, but adapt your tactics to something more intelligent, like a "Z" trench.
"White" is fundamentally bad tactics, for countless reasons. Biggest one is that by default, in an environment where you are being attacked, it allows the whole rest of the world to be "brown", to enter into an alliance against you. It could potentially even allow Southern Europeans to be, and there have been efforts along these lines to fissure them.
Another one is that it allows people to cross lines, and play sabotage. Jews have been strongly subversive because they can advocate for things like AA, while paying none of the cost, that they would need to pay, if they were called Jews, instead of being able to flit between the two terms, at their convenience.
Another reason "white" is bad is because it goes against the fundamental psychology of people. Many have the irresistible urge to color signal. "White" cannot win in that environment, because color-signaling is fundamentally about the Other, not about your own group. It is a word that encourages cucking.
I could easily make additional points, but I doubt anyone has read this far.Replies: @Thulean Friend
Let us bury the hatchet. Are you [half]Indian? I mean I move in similar circles, albeit among Mid-East Christians, but I’m Armenian and can intermingle with virtually anyone except negroes and eastasians, I find it hard to imagine a genuine blonde blue-eyed Swede casually mixing with Syrians, Albanians and such.
A Pure ethnic Swede wouldn't call out anti-white bigotry while ALSO knowing about India, Levant etc.
https://www.australianhindu.com/post/police-called-to-craigieburn-gurudwara-rebels-threaten-to-celebrate-khalistan-day
https://www.baaznews.org/p/deep-sidhu-craigieburn-gurdwara?s=r
This happened in Melbourne, but the main takeaway is the open presence of swords. Makes me very bullish on Australia being another base of Sikh operations||
With 1-2% in Canada, Germany, Australia & the UK maybe add NZ or Italy?? You have a formidable diaspora network. ;)
ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ
Are you familiar with this fine website sir?
It's a fun stupid parlour game to try classifying yourself, friends and acquaintances with it, anyway. A while ago, I remember someone told me I looked a lot like Vadislav Surkov, except much better looking (of course). I'm not sure I've ever been so insulted in my life.Replies: @Yahya
Yes.
Lol.
Caucasian phenotypes are somewhat of a mystery. They seem to range all over the map. Sort of a blend between Middle Eastern, Slavic and Asiatic; which incidentally would be appropriate considering their geography. My observation is that Caucasoids get lighter and more shifted towards Slavs in appearance the further North you go. Armenians and Azeris tend to look mostly Middle Eastern. Circassians and Georgians have more Slavic-looking folks. Though there is considerable intra-population variation and overlap between various Caucasian groups.
You can see here a traditional Circassian dance:
A mix of Slavic, Middle Eastern and Asiatic – shifted towards Slavs.
Armenians also exhibit the same tri-racial blend, but seem more shifted towards Middle Easterners.

Caucasian groups are broadly similar genetically speaking; they cluster together equidistantly from Middle Easterners and Europeans when put against West Eurasian populations. I couldn’t find a comprehensive study on Caucasian genetics (not a hot research topic, apparently), but from what i’ve pieced together all Caucasian groups are broadly “Caucasian” in ancestry (go figure); Kumyks seem to have the most East Asian admixture (~7%), Lezgin and Chechens the most N. European admixture (20%) and Armenians the most Middle Eastern (10%).
The subtle differences between them are reflected by their different modal phenotypes.

http://photos.geni.com/p13/cd/19/33/6a/5344483aa49cdf45/424px-pol_coa_kurcz_original.jpg
Note the crescent moons within the Mazepa family crest that ties the family to their Circassian ethnic roots.Replies: @Mikhail
https://academiacontacto.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/spaniards-in-the-world.jpg
Amal Clooney, the modal Levantine phenotype:
https://dilei.it/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2019/11/gettyimages-1161357065-2.jpg?w=670&h=377&quality=70&strip=all&crop=1
Kate Winslet, the modal British phenotype:
https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BZGE4ZmNjNDQtYmE2My00MTg3LTg3NDEtZTA2MzhhMTk2MDlmXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyNTgzNDU0ODY@._V1_.jpg
Unless I'm blind, Cruz appears to me far closer to Amal than Kate. And I bet juxtaposing a series of Spanish actresses with Lebanese and English actresses would mostly lead to the same outcome.Replies: @Yevardian, @silviosilver, @Mikel
Hold up, bucko, that is clearly not what I said. I think it’s simply a case of you misreading what I wrote, in your haste declare yourself “victor” (of a competition I didn’t even realize I was taking part in).
From my earlier post that you quoted here:
The straightforward reading of that is that there was a certain proportion of Spaniards – put aside how large that proportion is for now – that were “invisible” to me, because they didn’t bear traits my mind commonly associated with Spaniards. They were there all along, simply going about their business being Spaniards, but I didn’t register them as such. It is this select subset of Spaniards I claimed were – at least to me – “largely indistinguishable from northern Europeans”. I doubt anyone besides you who read those words would have concluded I was referring to all Spaniards with that remark.
What makes Dmitry any less biased than me? I’m not cashing checks on how “northern” Spaniards are perceived to be. If you (and apparently Dmitry) are correct, I’m happy to hear it – it means there are more people who bear family resemblance to me in that part of the world than I figured.
But there’s another question we might ask: is Dmitry even qualified to make such a determination? In my experience, part of the reason that anti-racists like him are anti-racists is because their racial perceptions are dulled, so on this basis alone I’d be inclined discount his testimony. And how much effort did he actually put into his estimates? I doubt he was walking around with notepad and pen, tallying the “types” he encountered, as though on a fact-finding mission. He probably wasn’t even thinking about it until the topic came up on this forum, at which point he scratched his head and, never one lost for words, decided to deliver his verdict.
I don’t think so, but have it your way.
And in which case, damn, it’s no wonder Spaniards were lining up to talk to your mother. Who is this aryan goddess who has deigned to alight upon our benighted shores, they wondered in awe. And who be the blackamoor accompanying her, the likes of which hath not been seen in our land? That, they agreed, must be her manservant; surely such a creature Spanish speaketh not.
(That is a joke, dude, RELAX.)
I do wonder though, is that her most representative pic, or was it tendentiously selected to help you make your point? Because dunno man, when I search google images for her name, virtually every pic that appears has her looking better than that. (Not a world of difference, by any means, but pic comparisons are a game of shades and subtleties, as I’m sure you’re aware…)
Greetings from Poland, a beautiful country. Brought 9 bags of mostly medical supplies but a few bulletproof vests and helmets also. A plane came in from Toronto with 60 bags of such supplies, brought by some young Canadian residents originally from Kiev and Kharkiv.
Lots of Ukrainians. Poles like them. They didn’t mind the construction workers but the women and kids are endearing. There are now more Ukrainian professionals integrating into society for now (they may return). The effects of the UPA murders on perceptions are being further eclipsed and erased. The local church is building a place for refugees. Happy to hear one Pole spontaneously tell me things like this crisis has brought our peoples together, that one day together we can stand up to rivals in the West or the East. Rebirth of some new form of PLC? Perhaps some good can come from the tragic and stupid Russian invasion.
Looks like the 1000 Ukrainians surrendering in Mariupol was fake (might have been 100) but the sinking of the Moskva flagship was real. Russian cope.
Russians respond by bombing more Ukrainian apartment buildings, strengthening resolve against them.
Bravo!
https://www.rt.com/sport/553884-pilic-russophobia-djokovic-medvedev/
https://www.rt.com/sport/553587-red-star-russia-basketball-banner/
They know the BS about indiscriminately seeking to wipe out a whole group of people.
His views include mixes of more upper class version of Tucker Carlson/"deplorable" in America, combined with pro-Ukraine, combined with some kremlinbot views (support for Potemkin villages). Then add support for conquistadors's warcrimes, support for Habsburg monarchy, not much interest in the European power-sharing or workers' rights, with views of anti-Soviet, pro-Poland, supporter of "Just World Hypothesis" (applied to HIV) etc. He also has panglossian views about topics like the income levels or culture in Ukraine, which does not match his views about America (where income and anglosaxon good behavior, is important) .
If you want to write propaganda for Ukraine, this is not what you would say. Moreover, he continues the same view mix of idiosyncrasy, without adjusting, and after Ukraine became the country most popular in the developed world, based on mapping about "democracy vs non-democracy". There is a forum user Jack D in the Steve Sailer forum, who has the most similar views overall with AP. But even Jack D does not have something this idiosyncratic to throw in the forums. Jack D's views about Ukraine and America are very similar to AP. Jack D has much more of the racist American views than AP, which also does not combine too well with his "Ellis Island immigrant" sympathy to Israel. As Israel is this chaotic, multiracial place, so how can American bourgeois person who support order and organized lawns, reconcile his values? A funny thing is when I argued with Jack D and AP about Russia, they both said things which I think are completely ridiculous. Then I checked them, and they were right and I am wrong. AP was actually correct more often than I am, when I argued with him about Russia. They both have somekind of mysterious intuitive knowledge in this area that can seem to match reality when you check, more than locals' common sense views.Replies: @utu
Very good observation of finding a common slot for Jack D and AP. That’s what I meant by “professional Ukrainian.” Jack D is a “professional Jew” assigned as a watchdog of Jewish interests at Sailer’s blog. Jack D has it easier because there is a huge body of Jewish apologetics literature on which he can draw. You can find there rhetorical answers to every anti-Jewish accusation ever made in last 3000 years.
AP was (self)assigned to Karlin blog do defend Ukrainian interests against mostly Russian prejudice. His job is easier than that of Jack D because hardly anybody knows anything about Ukrainians and for outsiders squabbles between Russians and Ukrainians are just as silly and meaningless as between Macedonians and Bulgarians and Serbians. However otoh Russia is in much better position because people know much more about it while Ukrainians are almost a blank slate. So professional Ukrainians can and must be more creative when inventing accomplishments they never had and famous figures who for strange reason are totally obscure and most importantly to work very hard on Ukrainian ethnogenesis and foundational myths to invent biological, linguistic and cultural separation from Russians.
Because of the difference between their subjects. Jak D and AP jobs are significantly different. The former is chiefly fending off accusations that Jews did something meaning that Jews were too active in history while AP deals with opposite that Ukrainians were too passive to the point they did nothing or that they did not exist. Fortunately for him in here in the righto-sphere accusation of cooperation with Nazis, holocaust and genocide were never in vogue because these are areas where Ukrainians actually excelled.
The jobs that Jack D and AP got themselves require talents where the adherence to truth is not of the highest order. Rhetorical effectiveness is what counts You must be ruthless and unscrupulous which comes under the guise of shameless chutzpah.
Most recent AP’s invention was that Ukrainians in Red Army during WWII were less brutal than Russians and other ethnic groups and thus German_reader and all other Germans should love Ukrainians more. And as his strongest proof for his hypothesis he offered this:
“I have seen no evidence that Ukrainians engaged in the behavior in Germany to the extent that Russians or especially non-Slavs did. “
This is exactly what you expect from a professional Ukrainian: a faith based reality.
One could forward several arguments that brutality of Ukrainians was actually worse than Russians beginning with Karlin HBDism that Ukrainians have lower IQ than Russians and thus are more likely to engage in brutal acts
or
that Ukrainians after strong and very enthusiastic involvement in Holocaust and genocide of Poles were much more skillful rapists and butchers who already overcame all human inhibitions against murder and rape than Russians. By the end of WWII 40% of soldiers in Red Army were Ukrainians. 10% of all Ukrainians were drafted to Red Army however the highest proportion (16%) was from Volhynia where the pool of draftees consisted of experienced murderers and rapists.
Ukraine traditionally has had lower violent crime rate and lower alcohol consumption rate than Russia. Violence in Volhynia was purposeful not random. Did Volhynians hate Germans?
So your claim that Ukrainians were as violent as Russians in Germany is likely false unless you have evidence to contrary. Do you, or are you lying again, your new pattern?Replies: @Yevardian
https://www.unz.com/akarlin/sixth-proof/#comment-3210903 It's common to view the Eastern European region as cursed (this is one of the themes of Bram Stoker's "Dracula"), but if you applied AP's "Just World Hypothesis", then such curses would be not encouraging sympathy for the people of this region, as their sins would be the cause of the curses. Not to remove their individuality, but they are from a similar culture. Jack D and AP are North-East Americans (one in New England, another in New Jersey), from origin in the region of Lvov. Jack D says his parents are from villages there. https://www.unz.com/isteve/new-frontiers-in-reverential-capitalization/#comment-5182586They both sound like wealthy American paterfamilias, that love dogs, support Trump, dislike what will be the liberal content of their children's elite education. Compared to AP, Jack D has less sentimental views about the massacres in his home region (https://www.unz.com/isteve/democrat-pols-vulnerable-to-their-own-mobs/#comment-2035122). Jack D doesn't believe in the "Just World Hypothesis" either. He is more cynical about the history. Jack D has obsessive racist views against African Americans and believes his dog also dislikes African Americans (https://www.unz.com/isteve/dueling-search-engines-was-kamala-harris-an-anchor-baby/#comment-4161474). Jack D writes like an engineer and also appreciates anglosaxon democratic culture. But I guess his main theme is racism against African Americans, with added racism in support of Galician Jews. AP is obviously a more sympathetic writer, as he is more friendly, writes about positive things usually. As for tribal support for ethnic groups, this is apparently socially encouraged culture (?) for post Ellis Island immigrants in East states of the USA. AP was writing about how his neighbors' children volunteered to join the Israeli army. Is this something very American in the understanding of history? They choose a good and a bad side. There is something similar in Russian culture. It's perhaps a result of being a powerful empire. Although Jews in medieval and early modern times had survived by their alliance to the aristocracy, eventually their birth rate was too high, and the majority were poor villagers. In the 18th century, the anti-Jewish accusation, was that they are racist, insular villagers, with provincial taste, stubborn, marry their cousin, believe primitive superstition, reject reason as they had rejected Christianity before. The problem of Jews for European Enlightenment, was they represented anti-universalism. This is a common view, in texts of Gibbon, even in 19th century texts of Schopenhauer. In 19th century, the anti-Jewish view is still that they are lower class, provincial villagers, but there is extremely rapid embourgeoisement of parts of the Jewish population, as well as urbanization of secularizing Jews. Then there is the sense this is fake, imitation acculturation, not like German's rooted in authentic society (e.g. Wagner's writings).
Secularizing Jewish culture was very sensitive to this sense of lower class origin in the 19th century, and it why the children were disproportionately studying classical music (so by the 20th century, a majority of world's classical music stars are Jewish). European urban sophistication became religion of the secularizing Jewish culture. Karl Marx, was asking people like Engels to send him money, so he could pay for his daughters' music lessons. In the more undeveloped regions, there is still a nostalgia of lower class Jewish culture (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JxCJrff9TLw.). But American Jewish, non-Orthodox organizations, are representing elite views and speak with Enlightenment language. They talk with "Noblesse oblige".Except in terms of their mission to support Israel or Jewish groups, they promote Afghan women. They like to increase diversity of Jewish culture (https://twitter.com/ADL/status/1513162121458053120.). They are kind of sophisticated and universalist sounding, which people like Ivanka Trump (from expensive schools), would not be embarrassed for. So, where is position for some e.g. Jack D, who seems like the old intolerant stereotype? It's not likely anyone would employ him as troll. Would you pay someone to write like a villager from Sholem Aleichem story, who rejects his daughter for marrying a Christian man? If you are employing professional Jewish commentator, they would not be Jack D, but African American Jews, with fashionable education in Dartmouth University, and they would write emotional comments about how they are eating passover food this year with LGBT Ukrainian refugees.Replies: @utu
Ukrainians will bring their ethnic antagonisms for Russians, the largest Euro country, outside the GAE powerblock. They'll seriously sabotage any sort of pan-European nationalism, or potential realignment away from America.
When they come, about 30% of the entry numbers, riding the same trains and buses, will be blacks, Indians, and Arabs. You can already see it, in the pictures. Many which are so embarrassing, and counter the narrative, that they have been pulled from government postings.
They are not going to identify with national history. Something like the Cromwellian Conquest or the Easter Rising will be boring to them. The Irish language will be about as interesting as it is to a Nigerian. They won't be blood and soil nationalists; the very idea will make them uncomfortable.
And their discomfort will be a dampening rod, for ethnic nationalists. If your old elementary school is suddenly over half Ukrainian (and that is the sort of thing I have heard) it is seriously going to dampen any national feelings.
Men are encouraged to stay. What the West will be getting is an infusion of pure estrogen, dependent on government handouts. Housing them will raise rents and getting them jobs will depress wages. It will make family formation more difficult. And with the imbalanced sex ratio, it may encourage miscegenation.
Currently, Europe doesn't have any sort of pan-ethnic cultural apparatus. There's a bit of it, buried deep in history, but there is no modern organ to compete with Hollywood, to spread a pan-national message. What they will get is the multicult message of Hollywood.
The younger ones will be fed straight into the public school system, where they will be indoctrinated. They will support refugees. After all, how could they not? It would be hypocritical for them not to, and, more-ever, it wouldn't gain them any victim points - and we live in a culture that elevates victims.
When politicians say "We are an immigrant nation" it will resonate with them, and they will nod their heads in agreement.Replies: @sudden death, @A123, @Coconuts
This could be too pessimistic, at least my own experience with East Slavs made me more interested in nationalism and more interested in ancestral European identity, because more people still have what I would think of as closer to a traditional European outlook and don’t have complexes or ironic distance from it.
The old phrase that used to be heard more in the early 20th century, ‘be a white man’ or as a form of praise ‘he’s a white man’ seems more applicable there now than it does in the West.
If you are going to have immigrants these could be amongst the best options, especially if some of the men came across as well, though partly it will depend on what kind of political context they are moving into, if all the institutions are very liberal-multiculturalist women especially may be more easily influenced into adopting these views.
In terms of Irish language a neglected area here might be Irish descent people in places like the UK, I intend to learn some because one of my grandads still spoke it as his mother tongue, and my mother has stories about not being able to communicate with her paternal grandmother who only had rudimentary English and it seems really weird, as I get older it becomes interesting to know what their language was like.
I also feel this strange disconnect. One thought that I've had is that I'm not even sure what the names of some of my recent ancestors were, as I'm not sure if they really used the English names that were given to them in the records.
I don't know if anyone would do it, but I'd like to see Blasket Island resettled with Irish speakers.
What I find really alarming now is that migrants are being settled directly in the Irish-speaking areas - it seems obvious to me, by design, to expunge them.Replies: @S
It might be worth noting that even Chapter Five of the Nato charter (far more binding than anything Taiwan has) is only an ostensible guarantees rather that the cast iron one sometimes assumed; it has a provision that each member country has to be satisfied that the war was not started by a fellow NATO member to be obliged to come to its aid. Taiwanese officials do not have the power to involve the US in a war with China, the only result of Taiwan's leaders trying it would be to put them in their graves.Replies: @Yellowface Anon
Even if America doesn’t military intervene (a coin toss instead of the certainty some Taiwanese assume to be) China can still be economically isolated, as in Russia. And Japan is far more likely to intervene in favor of Taiwan than the US, however weak they are against the sheet size of the PLA, because they continue to consider Taiwan outlying territory as a barrier for the defense of the Home Islands. The delicate balance will be upheld until one side deliberately breaks it.
The best way to deal with Taiwan (and what have actually been done over Ukraine with Minsk, but broken by both Ukraine and Russia) outside of one side’s power faltering is to have conventions in the style of Moroccan Crises to clearly provide mutual concessions and guarantees, to delineate spheres of influence. Taiwan can be a strengthened form of SAR where China, Japan and the US guarantees local autonomy under a loose transitory act of association, until conditions in Taiwan or China are suitable for closer integration. (This is what could also have been done in HK before 2019) The greatest obstacle to this is the American view of Communist control over society, and indeed the CCP’s assessment to what kind of control and leverage are most suitable to maintain local stability and security.
There will be some America-aligned elements (what Russian nationalists will call "svidomy") attempting to dislodge Chinese influence in Taiwan, but still a balance has to be sought between control and openness and to find ways to reduce or nullify such tendencies. Continuing a working relationship with the KMT will help even if they are being hated by the younger generation. But however, as the American cultural grip in Taiwan continues, there will inevitably be the narrative of "increasing Chinese control", without considering whether the form of control exercised by China is suitable for the conditions of Taiwan or not. No one can help with that!
(Not thinking it thru led to China falling into the failed Color Revolution trap the US set up in HK in 2019-20)Replies: @Sean
The 9 square on the Russian girls would be more interesting if we could tell which ones were Christian and which ones were Muslim! They can’t all be from the no hajib variety?
Straight lines are a geometrical concept and geometry is a part of mathematics. But nobody knows what mathematics is. Is it just a product of our mind or does mathematics have its own independent existence that humans are just discovering and understanding? If so, how were mathematics created? Where do they come from? Even though they have proven to be a very useful tool for us to understand the natural world, most of mathematics have no practical use whatsoever but still they appear to "hold true". This is one of the most fascinating debates in my view. One of the very few where philosophers can still offer some gain in knowledge, provided they are also well trained in mathematics.
I guess it can be can argued that, even if math is just a product of the human mind, as some great scientists think, its concepts, such as a straight line, are also part of nature since they are the output of a mammal brain: an organ of a natural species like any other.Replies: @AaronB
Sorry Mikel I was busy the last few days.
Yes, the question of “how do we know anything”, or “how do we know what we know” is one of the most important questions mankind can ask.
The end result of that kind of inquiry is always that certainty is impossible and we live, basically, on faith – even math, we now know, has to start with axioms it cannot prove (and apparently, there are a lot more than used to be thought) The more you insist on certainty, the stupider you become and the smaller your intellectual range.
Pascal said that anyone who has not reached the point in thinking where he realizes the world is far more mysterious than thought can capture is not very intelligent – and yet, this is the condition of modernity 🙂
Math can certainly give us one kind of truth and can certainly tell us something about one aspect of reality – however indirectly. And there is no reason we should not do the most beautiful and interesting math we know how to.
As you say, certainly doing math is a perfectly natural operation of the human mind, that has been going on for millennia.
Only, arguably the most important things in life that give it meaning and value cannot be measured by math, so a society that overvalues math will become a devitalized and bored society with a gradually weakening will to live. Us. Math cannot give us direct contact with reality, only abstract representations – but life is direct contact.
It’s a question of balance, as everything is.
To bring this around to your wonderful trip in the sand dunes, at the end you include the beautiful line that you don’t know why you did it and it served no purpose 🙂
Yet those are the most significant and important experiences – they have no “utility”, but simply engage with life, nature, and something larger than you.
A society that overvalues math may well lose the ability, gradually and over time, to understand these experiences, and after that comes death.
- I can't think of any viable or even desirable alternative that could be put into a manifesto. In general, all times in the past were probably worse than this one from the perspective of being able to lead a happy life. The 60s and early 70s must have been a wonderful time to be alive in the US (as long as you were not sent to Vietnam) but other than that, I can't think of any time that I would prefer to the current one.
Social pressure certainly exists to conform to a pretty uniform life style that is very unsatisfactory for many of us but that is our problem, not society's. If we really want to, we can lead almost any kind of live we want and society is not going to stop us. It's not just that we can join a hippie or Amish community or subsist from the land on a homestead. Some people in Alaska and in isolated cabins around the West lead almost a hunter-gatherer lifestyle and some of them are even promoted on popular TV programs as modern-day heroes. All of this with the huge advantage that our ancestors didn't have of going back to the boring but secure modern lifestyle if we change our mind or things get ugly.
- I have enough of a problem convincing my two adult children of what they should do for what I see as their own good. If I cannot even convince my children to change their lives, who am I to start planning full societal changes?
- As we've discussed in the past, and Silviosilver recently mentioned, if we managed to convince a large amount of people to lead a better life by leaving their jobs and simplifying their existence, we would could actually cause a big economic harm to many people that do not share our perspective for no real benefit for us. Our ability to enjoy life in contact with nature while making use of so many technological advances that you and I are so used to (for example, exchanging our ideas through the internet) depends on the majority of society leading the lifestyle that we reject.
I like reading your posts because you often present ideas that make me reevaluate how well I am doing in my old dream of leading a fulfilling life close to the beautiful places that I love. But extrapolating those ideas from the personal to the social sphere is another matter altogether.
No need to apologize for not having the time to respond! Is that lack of time not punishment enough on its own?
I am of course suggesting a proposal to articulate the demands for reunification under peaceful terms acceptable to both China and the US, and indeed interests in Taiwan. There is no secessionism in this but continuing to enjoy Taiwanese “autonomy” but with close Chinese supervision, like the original vision for HK. There is only political convergence and not divergence – either Taiwan converging with China or China converging with Taiwan. Reunifying with the least political cost.
There will be some America-aligned elements (what Russian nationalists will call “svidomy”) attempting to dislodge Chinese influence in Taiwan, but still a balance has to be sought between control and openness and to find ways to reduce or nullify such tendencies. Continuing a working relationship with the KMT will help even if they are being hated by the younger generation. But however, as the American cultural grip in Taiwan continues, there will inevitably be the narrative of “increasing Chinese control”, without considering whether the form of control exercised by China is suitable for the conditions of Taiwan or not. No one can help with that!
(Not thinking it thru led to China falling into the failed Color Revolution trap the US set up in HK in 2019-20)
Defeating an invasion of Taiwan would entail fighting inside what al agree is officially an integral part of China. The US has not even dared to fight inside the completely separate country of Ukraine, let alone on Russian territory. The US is not going to get any great technological advantage is conventional warfare. A vast swarm of meshed drones has been suggested as a conventional defence of Taiwan to enable an invasion to be repelled without use of battlefield nuclear weapons. Like the Chinese with their productive capacity are not going to be able to outnumber any Western drone fleet. It suits China to have Taiwan as a conduit, but China holds all the cards, and Taiwan knows it.Replies: @Yellowface Anon
I agree with your take on the terminology. It’s meaningless to shuffle semantics. It reminds me of the word juggling around the terminology for mentally retarded people. First it was “retarded”, then it was “special needs”, then it was “developmentally disabled”, and they are referred to now as “consumers”.
“Consumers” is perhaps the most offensive of all to my sensibilities since it sounds like a PC way to say worthless leach ,while retarded is the least offensive since it is just an unvarnished technical term to describe a relative mental capacity.
Naturally enough, any of the terms can be utilized as a slur by those with the desire to do so. Changing the term did nothing to modify reality or the unfortunate fact that some people will always enjoy insulting those less capable than themselves.
As you argue, it’s the same with the term white. You can come up with any term that you want and it won’t change the goals or the desired power dynamic of those in power.
Also, I completely disagree with your characterization of 'consumer.' If a large part of your daily activity involves the consumption of food and other material goods, then you can be fairly classified a consumer. That isn't the only role you play in society, much less the entirety of your identity, but in certain contexts the classification is perfectly reasonable and eminently useful - imagine an economic analysis that refused the conceptual clarity of 'producers' and 'consumers.' As I said above, changing the behavior of those opposed to you isn't the point; it is (one part of) presenting your case in the most attractive fashion to your prospective audience. This matters whether you are selling cars, jewelry, pizza or ideology.
I think Greg Cochran touched on this in his review: https://westhunt.wordpress.com/2018/03/29/who-we-are-1/
He's no Gould or Lewontin - I recognize that. And I sympathize with the desire to avoid a crazy mob with torches howling for his blood, pouring strange liquids over him, or shouting him down. That's happened to others, like Murray and Lynn, and such would probably made his work impossible.
But, honestly, it is very tedious to need to read through such disclaimers. To a certain extent, they are boiler-plate, if the author didn't put them in the publisher probably would.
Yet, I'm not sure how useful they are. Nicholas Wade put them in his book and he was still somewhat unpersoned. Charles Murray is usually very careful about what he says, and has said some very progressive things, though he is still a very controversial figure.
I wish it would be separated out, cocentrated in a skippable foreward.Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
If you think reading it is a chore you maybe ought to try watching one of the videos.
—Richard Nixon on the Bohemian Grove
Richard Nixon obviously didn’t ever see David Reich in action.
Germany seems to be 15-20 years away from open, easy carry of a normal size (2ft or so) Kirpan
I’d like to visit then, while I can understand your Hindu hatred of Sikhs – it’s pointless.
Sikhs have ‘assimilated’ into Liberalism – as a privileged class.
State support of Sikhi is only growing not receding so.. :shrug:
ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ
I remember arriving in Istanbul in 2014 and having a bowl of soup, bread and a glass of tea in a small diner for eight Turkish lira. I think today I would be lucky to get the same for 25 lira.
Given the comment he made above your’s it’s all but confirmed.
A Pure ethnic Swede wouldn’t call out anti-white bigotry while ALSO knowing about India, Levant etc.
https://www.australianhindu.com/post/police-called-to-craigieburn-gurudwara-rebels-threaten-to-celebrate-khalistan-day
https://www.baaznews.org/p/deep-sidhu-craigieburn-gurdwara?s=r
This happened in Melbourne, but the main takeaway is the open presence of swords. Makes me very bullish on Australia being another base of Sikh operations||
With 1-2% in Canada, Germany, Australia & the UK maybe add NZ or Italy?? You have a formidable diaspora network. 😉
ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ
DAm each on eof those circassian girls is a lookers – let’s invade||
I agree with what Cochran wrote in your third link. I’ll paraphrase. Reich is participating in group think axe grinding. I see far too much of it elsewhere and in fact all over the damn place and I’m sick of it.
After I finish reading the book I will probably trash it.
Do these guys have a handy opinion on Spencer Wells getting exiled across the Pacific Ocean after he wrote something rude regarding Zion on twitter?
When T.E. Lawrence (Lawrence of Arabia) was captured in disguise by the Ottomans in Deraa in late 1917, he tried to pass himself off as a Circassian by his own account, as they tend to be fair-skinned although Lawrence did not look like them in any case. He also claimed they were exempt from conscription into the Ottoman armed forces, which was certainly untrue – quite a few Ottoman cavalry in particular were Circassians.
The similarity in look amongst the group is notable. They’re all quite pretty, with maybe a slight nod going to the Circassian and Ingush girls in this department. I’ve know Ukrainian girls that have this look. The Circassians had sizeable immigrant groups throughout the ages within Ukraine, as they were always known as formidable warriors and would help swell the ranks of the Cossacks. Most notable of these clans was the Mazepa/Koledynskyi one, giving Ukraine one of its most famous Hetmans, Ivan Mazepa. Circassian women, of course, were considered to be the epitome of female beauty in the Western mind. To their neighbors to the north, Ukrainians were often referred to as “Cherkase” (Circassians) because of the influx of this ethnicity into Ukrainian lands.
Note the crescent moons within the Mazepa family crest that ties the family to their Circassian ethnic roots.
AP was (self)assigned to Karlin blog do defend Ukrainian interests against mostly Russian prejudice. His job is easier than that of Jack D because hardly anybody knows anything about Ukrainians and for outsiders squabbles between Russians and Ukrainians are just as silly and meaningless as between Macedonians and Bulgarians and Serbians. However otoh Russia is in much better position because people know much more about it while Ukrainians are almost a blank slate. So professional Ukrainians can and must be more creative when inventing accomplishments they never had and famous figures who for strange reason are totally obscure and most importantly to work very hard on Ukrainian ethnogenesis and foundational myths to invent biological, linguistic and cultural separation from Russians.
Because of the difference between their subjects. Jak D and AP jobs are significantly different. The former is chiefly fending off accusations that Jews did something meaning that Jews were too active in history while AP deals with opposite that Ukrainians were too passive to the point they did nothing or that they did not exist. Fortunately for him in here in the righto-sphere accusation of cooperation with Nazis, holocaust and genocide were never in vogue because these are areas where Ukrainians actually excelled.
The jobs that Jack D and AP got themselves require talents where the adherence to truth is not of the highest order. Rhetorical effectiveness is what counts You must be ruthless and unscrupulous which comes under the guise of shameless chutzpah.
Most recent AP's invention was that Ukrainians in Red Army during WWII were less brutal than Russians and other ethnic groups and thus German_reader and all other Germans should love Ukrainians more. And as his strongest proof for his hypothesis he offered this:
"I have seen no evidence that Ukrainians engaged in the behavior in Germany to the extent that Russians or especially non-Slavs did. "
This is exactly what you expect from a professional Ukrainian: a faith based reality.
One could forward several arguments that brutality of Ukrainians was actually worse than Russians beginning with Karlin HBDism that Ukrainians have lower IQ than Russians and thus are more likely to engage in brutal acts
or
that Ukrainians after strong and very enthusiastic involvement in Holocaust and genocide of Poles were much more skillful rapists and butchers who already overcame all human inhibitions against murder and rape than Russians. By the end of WWII 40% of soldiers in Red Army were Ukrainians. 10% of all Ukrainians were drafted to Red Army however the highest proportion (16%) was from Volhynia where the pool of draftees consisted of experienced murderers and rapists.Replies: @Mr. Hack, @AP, @Dmitry
Your feeble attempts here at some sort of character assassination is something that we might expect from Gerard, but you?…I wont waste too much time rebutting your asinine claims here, either about AP (one of the finer commenters here at this blog) or about Ukraine in general, suffice it to say that by your comments posted here you wholly place yourself within the camp of being both a lunatic and an unwholesome sort of Ukrainophobe. I thought higher of you until now…shame on you utu! 🙁
None of these things make them any less worthwhile reading, nor is it objectionable to point out that they have biases and loyalties. We all do, as does AP. Sometimes this may lead him or any of us to make dubious claims in support of those loyalties.
I didn't see any character assassination in utu's comment. Fer' cryin' out loud, it's utu we're talking about. If he wanted to commit a character assassination I'm pretty sure he would have been a lot more blunt force about it!Replies: @Mr. Hack
Caucasoids were blessed from Heaven with beauty genes.

European and Middle Eastern old-timers had a name for them: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circassian_beauty
Lord Byron:
Voltaire:
Bayard Taylor:
Turkish folk music:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4mND_UbI01A&ab_channel=Hakl%C4%B1veAhenkliYumruklar
– Kız Sen Geldin Çerkeş’ten
Turkish and Arab slave traders took a fair number of Circassians and Georgians as slaves some centuries ago. The males were sent to serve as Janissaries to the Turkish Sultans, or Mamluk warriors in Egypt; and the females served as concubines and household servants to wealthier citizens of the Ottoman Empire. You can still see their descendants in the Arab world today, disproportionately found among the upper class – though they are unaware of their slave background. You can usually spot them by their neat facial features, translucent white skin, occasional dirty-blonde hair and their most defining characteristic – an icy facial expression.
Mark Twain commented on the Armenian women he encountered in his visit to the Ottoman Empire:
– The Innocents Abroad, 1889
On the karlin discord a few people thought this is what Singhs mean by patriarchy:
https://twitter.com/bimboisis/status/1514655242058670088?s=20
No,
https://twitter.com/YungBhujang/status/1142426854193848322
ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ
We're all flawed men good associations (Sangat) & Code (Maryada) bring us back in line||
https://twitter.com/Parikramah/status/1319124560583733248
And also:
your second razib khan link is paywalled at my ISP. Otherwise thank you for those links which I had not previously read.
I fundamentally disagree.
Words have power because they are tied to ideas. He who controls the memes, controls the universe.
It is easy to see and appreciate in countless examples. If “sodomite” was still the only word used – not homosexual, not gay, not this long, ridiculous string – do you really think that gays would have so much power?
With regard to blacks, the euphemism treadmill may not have changed their innate qualities, but you make a logical error, if you suppose that is all that matters.
What matters is power, and it certainly has helped increase their power levels. Each change (with the latest to capitalize the “B” in “black”, note that it is asymmetrical, “white” is still “white”, because each change is power ) is an acknowledgement of their power. They have been moved away from essentialist words – Nigger and (and the formerly very polite) Negro – and moved towards blank-slatist words. “Black”, which even I feel I must use, as it wouldn’t do to get in the habit of using another word. And the ridiculous seven syllable word “African-American” which is an exercise in humiliation, meant to be difficult to say and thus difficult to use, an obstacle to speaking truths about them.
“White” is a word that was employed before we realized we are at war. When the other side starts coming at you with rolling artillery barrages, you better not stick with a straight line trench, but adapt your tactics to something more intelligent, like a “Z” trench.
“White” is fundamentally bad tactics, for countless reasons. Biggest one is that by default, in an environment where you are being attacked, it allows the whole rest of the world to be “brown”, to enter into an alliance against you. It could potentially even allow Southern Europeans to be, and there have been efforts along these lines to fissure them.
Another one is that it allows people to cross lines, and play sabotage. Jews have been strongly subversive because they can advocate for things like AA, while paying none of the cost, that they would need to pay, if they were called Jews, instead of being able to flit between the two terms, at their convenience.
Another reason “white” is bad is because it goes against the fundamental psychology of people. Many have the irresistible urge to color signal. “White” cannot win in that environment, because color-signaling is fundamentally about the Other, not about your own group. It is a word that encourages cucking.
I could easily make additional points, but I doubt anyone has read this far.
One could also construct a sort of philosophical argument, based on past history, when national borders were relatively closed. It was a much simpler model - it should have been easier to get right. But there was an incredible imbalance caused by urbanization.
Rural areas became almost deserted. People went into cities, and then these were drained too and became merely feeder stocks for super-cities, like London or Paris, areas totally devoid of rootedness, pulling the most talented from across the country, and pooling them together in the most dynamic place economically, but the absolutely worst place to have children.
If we could not work out the kinks of this model, to find the right balance of rootedness, then it was a special sort of hubris to pursue a greater movement of peoples across national boundaries.Replies: @A123
The % of population needed for rural activities (primarily agriculture) plummeted due to technology. Other resources were only available in cities. With 1800-1900’s level technology, urban concentration was required. The U.S. slipped this constraint somewhat as personal autos made suburban life practical (much to TF’s dismay).
Perhaps 2000’s level technology plus the WUHAN-19 plague from China will allow & encourage more decentralization. It is now proven that those in the Information economy do not need to be tied to an urban desk 8 hours a day 5 days a week. Much of the Service economy depends on population and will decentralize along with information workers.
I do not know that thus will necessarily lead to “rootedness”, however it is much more appealing for family raising and life “balance”.
___
Politically, aggressive “Blue” city life being replaced by more civilized “Red” suburban life is clearly win. The puppeteers running the current U.S. regime want gasoline to continue to surge in price as it makes suburban life more difficult.
The key to successful migration is assimilation. This places objective limits on the number and quality of those let in.
It is outright malice, not hubris, driving Globalists to exceed the maximum assimilation rate. Destruction of nationality is among their objectives. How else can they achieve their dream of SJW Islamic unification under UN/NWO rule?
PEACE 😇
Technology can be a big help and should not be rejected out of hand. But it can be difficult to use it correctly, to make sure that it doesn't add to the imbalance. I think that if we are to have new cultural adaptions for living in the modern world, some of those adaptions must necessarily be in rules about how we govern our use of technology, so that we may use it, instead of being used by it.
https://styles.redditmedia.com/t5_2ws4n/styles/image_widget_is6coc4xem041.jpg?format=pjpg&s=e516d9dc2e681eb7d7044279ead34a3e4056a0a4
Nor did the source populations of Indo-Europeans come from the eastern steppes. Well, there is some truth to his claims (though i'm skeptical of precise co-ordinates). But ultimately the Indo-Aryans were a mixed-origin people. Genetic studies indicate Yamnaya pastoralists were roughly 50% derived of eastern hunter-gatherers from the steppes of Ukraine/Russia, and 50% derived from Iranian farmers. The latter component was introduced into a base population of EHGs roughly 5,000-7,000 years ago. The Iranian farmers are most closely related to present-day Mingrelians, from the backwoods of Georgia. Also Armenians and Iranians to a lesser extent.This leads some to speculate that Iranian farmer originated somewhere in the Caucasus, rather than Iran proper. But David Reich reassures that they came from further south in Iran. Either way, Iranian farmers only comprised half of Indo-European ancestry, the rest being indigenous hunter-gatherers from the Pontic Steppe. So there is no single definitive Garden Of Eden.Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @S
Speaking of which I’ve recently been reading up on the mountainside tomb and inscription of Darius I located in the south of Iran and constructed about 500 BC. What impresses, besides the obvious skill necessary to create it, is how very modern it appears.
Memorials haven’t changed all that much in 2500 years it would seem.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tomb_of_Darius_the_Great
http://photos.geni.com/p13/cd/19/33/6a/5344483aa49cdf45/424px-pol_coa_kurcz_original.jpg
Note the crescent moons within the Mazepa family crest that ties the family to their Circassian ethnic roots.Replies: @Mikhail
So much for the svido pure Slav BS.
Words have power because they are tied to ideas. He who controls the memes, controls the universe.
It is easy to see and appreciate in countless examples. If "sodomite" was still the only word used - not homosexual, not gay, not this long, ridiculous string - do you really think that gays would have so much power?
With regard to blacks, the euphemism treadmill may not have changed their innate qualities, but you make a logical error, if you suppose that is all that matters.
What matters is power, and it certainly has helped increase their power levels. Each change (with the latest to capitalize the "B" in "black", note that it is asymmetrical, "white" is still "white", because each change is power ) is an acknowledgement of their power. They have been moved away from essentialist words - Nigger and (and the formerly very polite) Negro - and moved towards blank-slatist words. "Black", which even I feel I must use, as it wouldn't do to get in the habit of using another word. And the ridiculous seven syllable word "African-American" which is an exercise in humiliation, meant to be difficult to say and thus difficult to use, an obstacle to speaking truths about them.
"White" is a word that was employed before we realized we are at war. When the other side starts coming at you with rolling artillery barrages, you better not stick with a straight line trench, but adapt your tactics to something more intelligent, like a "Z" trench.
"White" is fundamentally bad tactics, for countless reasons. Biggest one is that by default, in an environment where you are being attacked, it allows the whole rest of the world to be "brown", to enter into an alliance against you. It could potentially even allow Southern Europeans to be, and there have been efforts along these lines to fissure them.
Another one is that it allows people to cross lines, and play sabotage. Jews have been strongly subversive because they can advocate for things like AA, while paying none of the cost, that they would need to pay, if they were called Jews, instead of being able to flit between the two terms, at their convenience.
Another reason "white" is bad is because it goes against the fundamental psychology of people. Many have the irresistible urge to color signal. "White" cannot win in that environment, because color-signaling is fundamentally about the Other, not about your own group. It is a word that encourages cucking.
I could easily make additional points, but I doubt anyone has read this far.Replies: @Thulean Friend
Thanks for a thorough reply. I will give it the respect it deserves by addressing your points where I think there is something important to discuss.
Words are indeed powerful but it is the powerful who decides which words are loaded in specific ways. White can be neutral, negative or positive depending on the social context in which it is said. It depends on the power dynamics in society. A group which is disempowered – or highly atomised, in the case of whites – can come up with clever new phrases all day, it won’t make a damn difference.
Being called homosexual was punishment enough when homophobia was rampant; there was no need for slurs. Now even calling someone a sodomite wouldn’t make a difference, because it’s an empty insult that would only reflect bad on whoever uttered the slur. Why? Power dynamics shifted. Words follow the latter, not vice versa, which is our fundamental disagreement.
That doesn’t mean words are unimportant, but the power behind them matters more than the words in of themselves.
I think I mentioned this to Dmitry in a prior debate, but much of the “brown world” will be the last holdouts of white supremacy. The hostility towards whites that exist in the American MSM does not carry through to the non-Western world, hell even Europe is starting to chafing at the cultural programming (see Macron’s rants).
So I don’t think there’s much risk of a “us vs them” here. That’s already baked into the cake. In Indian lingo, whites are referred to gora. It doesn’t prevent Indians from sadly acting in an obsequious manner all too often.
I think your mistake here is taking the rancid anti-white media environment that exists in the US, which I view as poison, and transferring onto the rest of the world. If Trump had been everything the media claimed he was (a white supremacist fascist etc) and actually succeeded, then you’d see the rest of the world adapting very quickly with minimal reputational risk for whites even traveling abroad.
But beyond these reasons, there’s also a fundamental problem with your argument. Calling someone “European” can be easily washed out just as “Swedish” is starting to become a civic nationalist identity. White is more explicitly racial and thus inescapably demarcated in a way that Swedish, German or European are not. Those identity markers had a racial subtext which is gradually weakening but the words in of themselves are not limiting to outsiders. White is.
In addition, words must follow reality. As the population of Western countries becomes more mixed – including other European ethnicities mixing with each other – it simply makes less sense to cling to outdated identities even if purely for pragmatic reasons. What sense does it make for someone with 1/2 Serbian, 1/4 German and 1/4 Italian ancestry to embrace a German identity? Unless that identity is cosmopolitan, which it increasingly is. If you want something else, it means a racial one. It’s inescapable.
That’s an argument that white identity is too porous and that whites are too permissive for outsiders to play interlopers. In other words, it’s an argument against liberalism not the white racial identity per se. This rule was harder to enforce in previous times but now we have genetic testing, so there is no no longer any real barrier to enforcing this rule anymore. It’s purely a question of will on behalf of whites to do so, which they evidently do not wish to do as of now.
I suppose a more technically correct term would be pinkish-beige or perhaps orange. Jokes aside, this seems a trivial or even irreverent point to make.
I always read your comments, songbird, as you are easily one of the highest-quality contributors on this blog, even when I disagree, as I do now.
The internet has only atomized already atomized groups & the middle class. It's driven lower class & elite solidarity like never before. Those who can play within the system while commanding loyalty outside of it - prosper. Like the Khalsa,
Someone can't be a traitor to a nation-state when they only believe in the Guru. You also place too much faith into genetics & culture instead of institutions. All you can do is watch as both Hinduvta & Euro nationalism are destroyed for being fake & gay - weak, unable to capture institutions nor offer resistance outside of em.
ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ
The sort of thing that you would hear in German class is that there were small communities of German speakers out in the Midwest. Small towns, where you could enter into a bakery and order in German.
I always thought that they were lying. But, in fact, they were telling the truth. They existed at least into the ’90s, maybe, the 2000s. Though I doubt they are still there now. One of my regrets is not visiting them.
Well, technically, I suppose you could say they still exist, if you count the Amish or Mennonites. You can even hear it in Mexico, which, for me, would be a meta-experience. But I’m not sure how similar Plautdietsch is to modern German. We shall need to get GR to listen to it, and tell us.
Nationalists aren't serious about their enterprise. They just want to be heard, and are ok with being ignored afterward. No one thinks Whites or Hindus will launch a mass scale purge or insurgency, and the international order and domestic policies are formulated with these assumptions in mind.
The very traits which make it possible for a group to form a functioning modern liberal nation state - respect for authority, non-kinship based trust networks, secular national identity - also make it impossible for any large scale action against said entity or to change its direction.
This is the age of religious militias - pick one.
ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹReplies: @songbird
German Americans were whipped into the closet en masse in 1914.Replies: @songbird
Yea Ig, I wouldn’t wanna marry into a family of daughter-sellers though.
On the karlin discord a few people thought this is what Singhs mean by patriarchy:
https://twitter.com/bimboisis/status/1514655242058670088?s=20
No,
ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ
We’re all flawed men good associations (Sangat) & Code (Maryada) bring us back in line||
AP was (self)assigned to Karlin blog do defend Ukrainian interests against mostly Russian prejudice. His job is easier than that of Jack D because hardly anybody knows anything about Ukrainians and for outsiders squabbles between Russians and Ukrainians are just as silly and meaningless as between Macedonians and Bulgarians and Serbians. However otoh Russia is in much better position because people know much more about it while Ukrainians are almost a blank slate. So professional Ukrainians can and must be more creative when inventing accomplishments they never had and famous figures who for strange reason are totally obscure and most importantly to work very hard on Ukrainian ethnogenesis and foundational myths to invent biological, linguistic and cultural separation from Russians.
Because of the difference between their subjects. Jak D and AP jobs are significantly different. The former is chiefly fending off accusations that Jews did something meaning that Jews were too active in history while AP deals with opposite that Ukrainians were too passive to the point they did nothing or that they did not exist. Fortunately for him in here in the righto-sphere accusation of cooperation with Nazis, holocaust and genocide were never in vogue because these are areas where Ukrainians actually excelled.
The jobs that Jack D and AP got themselves require talents where the adherence to truth is not of the highest order. Rhetorical effectiveness is what counts You must be ruthless and unscrupulous which comes under the guise of shameless chutzpah.
Most recent AP's invention was that Ukrainians in Red Army during WWII were less brutal than Russians and other ethnic groups and thus German_reader and all other Germans should love Ukrainians more. And as his strongest proof for his hypothesis he offered this:
"I have seen no evidence that Ukrainians engaged in the behavior in Germany to the extent that Russians or especially non-Slavs did. "
This is exactly what you expect from a professional Ukrainian: a faith based reality.
One could forward several arguments that brutality of Ukrainians was actually worse than Russians beginning with Karlin HBDism that Ukrainians have lower IQ than Russians and thus are more likely to engage in brutal acts
or
that Ukrainians after strong and very enthusiastic involvement in Holocaust and genocide of Poles were much more skillful rapists and butchers who already overcame all human inhibitions against murder and rape than Russians. By the end of WWII 40% of soldiers in Red Army were Ukrainians. 10% of all Ukrainians were drafted to Red Army however the highest proportion (16%) was from Volhynia where the pool of draftees consisted of experienced murderers and rapists.Replies: @Mr. Hack, @AP, @Dmitry
Or instead, highlighting a common experience.
Ukraine traditionally has had lower violent crime rate and lower alcohol consumption rate than Russia. Violence in Volhynia was purposeful not random. Did Volhynians hate Germans?
So your claim that Ukrainians were as violent as Russians in Germany is likely false unless you have evidence to contrary. Do you, or are you lying again, your new pattern?
You’re correct, but have a mental gap regarding competing power centers within a national polity – mental gap of many nationalists who put all their eggs into the baskets of assimilation and national identity.
The internet has only atomized already atomized groups & the middle class. It’s driven lower class & elite solidarity like never before. Those who can play within the system while commanding loyalty outside of it – prosper. Like the Khalsa,
Someone can’t be a traitor to a nation-state when they only believe in the Guru. You also place too much faith into genetics & culture instead of institutions. All you can do is watch as both Hinduvta & Euro nationalism are destroyed for being fake & gay – weak, unable to capture institutions nor offer resistance outside of em.
ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ
I once heard an amusing story about my grandfather. He was walking down the street behind two gibbering old ladies in shawls. And he heckled them, and said something like “Go back to Italy!” And they turned around, and it was his mother and his aunt.
I also feel this strange disconnect. One thought that I’ve had is that I’m not even sure what the names of some of my recent ancestors were, as I’m not sure if they really used the English names that were given to them in the records.
I don’t know if anyone would do it, but I’d like to see Blasket Island resettled with Irish speakers.
What I find really alarming now is that migrants are being settled directly in the Irish-speaking areas – it seems obvious to me, by design, to expunge them.
https://www.academia.edu/27219183/Between_urban_and_national_Political_mobilization_among_Mizrahim_in_Israel_s_development_towns_
I do not know that thus will necessarily lead to "rootedness", however it is much more appealing for family raising and life "balance".
___
Politically, aggressive "Blue" city life being replaced by more civilized "Red" suburban life is clearly win. The puppeteers running the current U.S. regime want gasoline to continue to surge in price as it makes suburban life more difficult. The key to successful migration is assimilation. This places objective limits on the number and quality of those let in.
It is outright malice, not hubris, driving Globalists to exceed the maximum assimilation rate. Destruction of nationality is among their objectives. How else can they achieve their dream of SJW Islamic unification under UN/NWO rule?
PEACE 😇Replies: @songbird
The internet definitely has the potential to be a re-balancer, if it is used correctly.
Technology can be a big help and should not be rejected out of hand. But it can be difficult to use it correctly, to make sure that it doesn’t add to the imbalance. I think that if we are to have new cultural adaptions for living in the modern world, some of those adaptions must necessarily be in rules about how we govern our use of technology, so that we may use it, instead of being used by it.
I always thought that they were lying. But, in fact, they were telling the truth. They existed at least into the '90s, maybe, the 2000s. Though I doubt they are still there now. One of my regrets is not visiting them.
Well, technically, I suppose you could say they still exist, if you count the Amish or Mennonites. You can even hear it in Mexico, which, for me, would be a meta-experience. But I'm not sure how similar Plautdietsch is to modern German. We shall need to get GR to listen to it, and tell us.Replies: @sher singh, @Emil Nikola Richard
All the rhetoric is fake & gay – people like Thulean are trying 19th C strategies (mob or demos-cratic power) in an age of oligarchs (aristocrats – technocrats). Immigration has continued to increase in the EU, and multicultural policies have continued to proliferate.
Nationalists aren’t serious about their enterprise. They just want to be heard, and are ok with being ignored afterward. No one thinks Whites or Hindus will launch a mass scale purge or insurgency, and the international order and domestic policies are formulated with these assumptions in mind.
The very traits which make it possible for a group to form a functioning modern liberal nation state – respect for authority, non-kinship based trust networks, secular national identity – also make it impossible for any large scale action against said entity or to change its direction.
This is the age of religious militias – pick one.
ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ
It has been over 1000 years, since my ancestors prayed to their local clan saint (as in one of them) to kill their viking enemy over the seas, which tactic they averred worked.Replies: @Thulean Friend, @sher singh
https://academiacontacto.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/spaniards-in-the-world.jpg
Amal Clooney, the modal Levantine phenotype:
https://dilei.it/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2019/11/gettyimages-1161357065-2.jpg?w=670&h=377&quality=70&strip=all&crop=1
Kate Winslet, the modal British phenotype:
https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BZGE4ZmNjNDQtYmE2My00MTg3LTg3NDEtZTA2MzhhMTk2MDlmXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyNTgzNDU0ODY@._V1_.jpg
Unless I'm blind, Cruz appears to me far closer to Amal than Kate. And I bet juxtaposing a series of Spanish actresses with Lebanese and English actresses would mostly lead to the same outcome.Replies: @Yevardian, @silviosilver, @Mikel
Thank you for that video clip. Very nice song and cute chick.
Though, to be perfectly honest with you, this may be the first time I enjoy listening to a piece of Arab music. I generally find it too exotic and repetitive for my ears. This song, on the other hand, sounds very refined and melodic. Much better actually than the Andalusian folk music I’m familiar with.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arab Muslims:Nidal Ibourk (Moroccan Muslim):https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vflg8ee2VJ0&ab_channel=NidalIbourkDalal Abu-Amneh (Palestinian Muslim):https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XDr51TRvyAw&t=286s&ab_channel=DalalAbuAmneh-%D8%AF%D9%84%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A3%D8%A8%D9%88%D8%A2%D9%85%D9%86%D8%A9Hussein Al-Jasmi (Emirati Muslim):https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9UZ8eu6HFDk&ab_channel=HussainAlJassmi%7C%D8%AD%D8%B3%D9%8A%D9%86%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AC%D8%B3%D9%85%D9%8ANai Barghouti (Palestinian Muslim):https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SGL50Qic_Z0&ab_channel=NaiBarghouti%D9%86%D8%A7%D9%8A%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A8%D8%B1%D8%BA%D9%88%D8%AB%D9%8A--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Folk Music:Syrian:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VGUdcmb5QOU&ab_channel=ZeinAl-Jundi-Topic
Lebanese:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JLjBTsizW68&ab_channel=CemHicaziPalestinian:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O6RaxQ6Lydg&ab_channel=Takkat-%D8%AA%D9%83%D9%91%D8%A7%D8%AAIraqi:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R3KqCu2Gn08&ab_channel=%D8%B3%D9%83%D8%B1SUGARNote: this is an Iraqi folk song performed by a school choir in Damascus.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arabesques:Turkish Arabesque:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELM7uKFehqI&ab_channel=AvrupaM%C3%BCzikNote: Turkish-Arabesque is a major sub-set of Turkish music which reached its peak of popularity in the 1960s through to the 90s, but still remains somewhat popular today. In essence, it’s a Turkish adoption of the Arabic style of music. Sometimes (like in the song above) the composition is original and only imitates the Arabic style. Other times it’s an outright Turkish rendition of old Arabic (mostly Levantine) songs by Turks in either Arabic or Turkish, or a mix of both. Some prominent Turkish-Arabesque singers include İbrahim Tatlıses, Neşe Yılmaz (Zara), Sibel Can, Orhan Gencebay, Ferdi Tayfur, Müslüm Gürses, Hakkı Bulut, Ebru Gündeş, Seda Sayan, Zerrin Özer and Azer Bülbül (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arabesque_(Turkish_music)).Turkish Arabesque 2:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0wlfyU8t4lw&list=PL6bWSO9itU1WnrsEr0Jf3216HCg9_jaq9&index=5&ab_channel=ZM%C3%BCzikSephardic-Mizrahi Arabesque: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VW_6vnwazwc&ab_channel=zig123izeNote: same thought as Turkish-Arabesque, except Arabic songs are sung mostly by Sephardic/Mizrahi Jews (and occasionally Kavkazi Jews like Sarit Haddad) from Israel (more here: https://www.youtube.com/user/tzuri1983/featured). The songs are sometimes sung in their original Arabic, sometimes in Hebrew, and sometimes a mix of both. The Israelis are pretty good with their Arabic pronunciations - much better than the Turks. (Further reading: https://www.heyalma.com/the-lost-connection-between-israeli-and-turkish-female-musicians/ Western Arabesque:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y_goHl-GuNk&ab_channel=Fledermaus1990Note: Arabesque music composed in the Western classical tradition. Strictly speaking, the music is not Arabic in style, nor do I discern any elements which are commonly found in Arabic music. This is isn’t to say Western Arabesque is bad, just that it isn’t Arabic in any meaningful manner. Some eminent composers of Arabesques include Debussy (“Two Arabesques”), Tchaikovsky (“Arabian Dance”), Schumann (“Arabeske in C”), and Tarrege (“Caprico Arabe”).--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Classical Music:Andalusian:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ICZ3s1qyvM&ab_channel=%D8%A7%D8%B3%D8%A7%D9%85%D9%87Andalusian 2:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nEsaQXj7JhE&ab_channel=AndreHajjOttoman:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MTkYGC58C-w&list=OLAK5uy_lxtu-AS_YuyyprPpFCaV8pyhixjyc9tqM&index=6&ab_channel=ClassicalArabicOrchestraofAleppo-TopicByzantine:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bqhen0OfB3E&t=1sArmenian:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_4OI0wBZzk&ab_channel=VanoushKhanamirian-TopicJerusalem:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vowbT3hqy0o&ab_channel=MohCoolManNote: this one is my personal favorite. It's an ode to the sacred city; composed by the Rahbani Brothers, based on the works of Lebanese poet Said Akl, and originally sung by the legendary Fairuz (Lebanese Christian) in 1967. It talks about the loss of Jerusalem; and what it meant to Muslims and Christians in the region. You can also find modern cover versions by Yasmin Ali (Egyptian Muslim) and Dalal Abu-Amneh (Palestinian Muslim).Replies: @Mikel
I always thought that they were lying. But, in fact, they were telling the truth. They existed at least into the '90s, maybe, the 2000s. Though I doubt they are still there now. One of my regrets is not visiting them.
Well, technically, I suppose you could say they still exist, if you count the Amish or Mennonites. You can even hear it in Mexico, which, for me, would be a meta-experience. But I'm not sure how similar Plautdietsch is to modern German. We shall need to get GR to listen to it, and tell us.Replies: @sher singh, @Emil Nikola Richard
Before 1914 yes. After 1914 almost never. I wonder where you are getting this information. You know any hundred-and-twenty-year-olds?
German Americans were whipped into the closet en masse in 1914.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Fredericksburg,_Texas#20th_and_21st_centuriesIMO, it was a mistake to let these different places die, they could have become big tourist attractions.Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
Lots of Ukrainians. Poles like them. They didn’t mind the construction workers but the women and kids are endearing. There are now more Ukrainian professionals integrating into society for now (they may return). The effects of the UPA murders on perceptions are being further eclipsed and erased. The local church is building a place for refugees. Happy to hear one Pole spontaneously tell me things like this crisis has brought our peoples together, that one day together we can stand up to rivals in the West or the East. Rebirth of some new form of PLC? Perhaps some good can come from the tragic and stupid Russian invasion.Replies: @Thulean Friend, @Seraphim
I’ve read that ~20% of Krakow’s and Warsaw’s populations are now Ukrainian. If there was a lot of inter-ethnic tension, it would have been impossible to miss or to hide. Clearly there is not.
Over 120K Ukrainian students are now enrolled in the national school system, which is around 1/3rd of the fresh intake during a normal year, so we’re talking gigantic numbers. Some think the new Ukrainian pupils could swell to well above 200K before the end of the year.
If you find the time, It’d be greatly appreciated if you could post some of your spontaneous impressions as they are best delivered while fresh. Your previous travelogues to Austria, Moscow and Galicia were superb.
Expending an expendable population subgroup is very "Killer" KGB. That seems like his true, personal devotion.
PEACE 😇
https://cilisos.my/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/putin.pngReplies: @sudden death
haha, looks like your real political love&allegiance was revealed to IslamoPutin, who is organizing muslim flooding to EU 😉
All the credit for reducing some kadyrovite numbers goes just to Ukrainian soldiers while muslim Putin is saving the large bulk of kadyrovite forces as his potential own (PR)aetorian guard by leaving&filming them safely behind first lines of engagements.
Hopefully Putin recognizes as this and lets his inner-KGB devotion lose on Ole George's NGO's.
____
Is there any additional information on the Russian Missile Cruiser?
-- No footage of the attack is a statistical fluke
-- A Neptune downing a full sized cruiser would be another fluke
Was the ship taken out by sabotage or accident? Either of those is more plausible than the missile story.
PEACE 😇
__________(1) https://www.breitbart.com/faith/2022/04/15/pope-francis-we-are-racists-we-are-racists/
In Houston they loved the New Orleans Katrina refugees. For a short time. They soon realized that New Orleans negroes come from a damaged stock compared to Houston negroes and people stopped claiming any New Orleans association pretty fast.
German Americans were whipped into the closet en masse in 1914.Replies: @songbird
Oldest lady I ever knew was 97. Lived before the Model T and airplanes. Wish I had thought to ask her more about the world she grew up in, but I was very young when I knew her, and did not think about it much.
This was truer in big cities, which had German newspapers. IIRC, HL Mencken once worked for one, unless I am thinking of someone else.
But actually, in a small place like Fredericksburg, TX, they had a German school right up to WW2. So, in the ’90s you could have still seen a lot of German-speaking gaffers.
Lyndon B. Johnson actually met Adenauer in Frederiscksburg once:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Fredericksburg,_Texas#20th_and_21st_centuries
IMO, it was a mistake to let these different places die, they could have become big tourist attractions.
I heard it was the very last of its ilk. There was a podcaster a couple of months ago saying it is impossible now to find housing in Fredericksberg but they make a ton of dough for Airbnb.
Both Putin and Zelensky were rolled by the ultimate Muslim power broker George IslamoSoros.
Hopefully Putin recognizes as this and lets his inner-KGB devotion lose on Ole George’s NGO’s.
____
Is there any additional information on the Russian Missile Cruiser?
— No footage of the attack is a statistical fluke
— A Neptune downing a full sized cruiser would be another fluke
Was the ship taken out by sabotage or accident? Either of those is more plausible than the missile story.
PEACE 😇
Nationalists aren't serious about their enterprise. They just want to be heard, and are ok with being ignored afterward. No one thinks Whites or Hindus will launch a mass scale purge or insurgency, and the international order and domestic policies are formulated with these assumptions in mind.
The very traits which make it possible for a group to form a functioning modern liberal nation state - respect for authority, non-kinship based trust networks, secular national identity - also make it impossible for any large scale action against said entity or to change its direction.
This is the age of religious militias - pick one.
ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹReplies: @songbird
Easy for you to say, when your religion is codified militantism.
It has been over 1000 years, since my ancestors prayed to their local clan saint (as in one of them) to kill their viking enemy over the seas, which tactic they averred worked.
Even moslems are growing soft. It's ironic, but Arabs are now often more liberal than many South Asian moslems, especially Afghans but also Pakistanis. Turks give their Pakistani simps an uncomfortable smile as Pakistan's love campaign for Turkish culture is far from reciprocated.Replies: @sher singh, @songbird
Pitamah Bhishma roared: “Kshatriya Dharma is unique. It has no memory. Not of sins, past births or failings” Fight bravely, and force Indra to share his throne. Even the gods envy the death of a Kshatriya on the battlefield”
https://www.manglacharan.com/post/three-paths-to-liberation-and-the-gobind-gita
ਤਾਹਿ ਮੁਕਤ ਹਰ ਹਾਲਤ ਮਾਈ ॥ ਸੁਨਹੁ ਖਾਲਸਾ ਜੀ ਸਕ ਨਾਹੀ ॥ ਛਤ੍ਰ ਪੰਥ ਯਹ ਅਸ ਧੁਜ ਕੀਨਾ ॥ ਮਾਤਾ ਮਹਾ ਕਾਲਿਕਾ ਦੀਨਾ ॥7॥
These are the ways to liberation, listen Khalsa and do not doubt. The path of the warrior under the Sword, The Mother the Great Death has Herself ordained||
ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Fredericksburg,_Texas#20th_and_21st_centuriesIMO, it was a mistake to let these different places die, they could have become big tourist attractions.Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
Ah yes Fredericksberg.
I heard it was the very last of its ilk. There was a podcaster a couple of months ago saying it is impossible now to find housing in Fredericksberg but they make a ton of dough for Airbnb.
Though, to be perfectly honest with you, this may be the first time I enjoy listening to a piece of Arab music. I generally find it too exotic and repetitive for my ears. This song, on the other hand, sounds very refined and melodic. Much better actually than the Andalusian folk music I'm familiar with.Replies: @Yahya
Aaron Copeland noted that listeners feel more comfortable hearing familiar rhythms.
It would be tough for a Westerner to adjust to the scales found in Arabic music and vice-versa. It took me some time to get used to Western Classical Music. Arabic music is traditionally based on a musical scale of 7 notes that repeats at the octave. Some maqams have 2 or more alternative scales. Maqam scales in traditional Arabic music are microtonal, in comparison to modern Western music, which is based on a twelve-tone equal-tempered musical tuning system.
But Arabic music (except in the Gulf) has gradually been moving towards the direction of Western music. The past few decades saw the introduction of more Western instruments like the piano, the electric organ, the electric guitar, and the double bass. In addition, Arabic music began shifting towards equal-tempered tuning; increasing the use of harmony; and growing the traditional Arabic chamber group (the takht) to the size of a large orchestra as well as employing conductors were previously there were none.
If you are interested, I recommend listening to some Westernized Arabic music (which imo is superior to in quality to modern Western music, but inferior to Western classical music). Since everyone has varied musical tastes, i’ll throw some below the more tag and see what sticks.
Actually one reason I posted that video was because she played the guitar (introduced to Spain during the Islamic period, incidentally), which I thought would be more familiar to your ear. There are several orchestral versions of that song on YouTube:
Arab Christians:
Julia Boutros (Lebanese Christian):
Ghada Shebeir (Syriac Christian):
Marian Layousse (Palestinian Christian):
Faia Younan (Assyrian Christian):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ETsM-2PdfM&ab_channel=FaiaYounan%D9%81%D8%A7%D9%8A%D8%A7%D9%8A%D9%88%D9%86%D8%A7%D9%86
————————————————————————————————————–
Arab Muslims:
Nidal Ibourk (Moroccan Muslim):
Dalal Abu-Amneh (Palestinian Muslim):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XDr51TRvyAw&t=286s&ab_channel=DalalAbuAmneh-%D8%AF%D9%84%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A3%D8%A8%D9%88%D8%A2%D9%85%D9%86%D8%A9
Hussein Al-Jasmi (Emirati Muslim):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9UZ8eu6HFDk&ab_channel=HussainAlJassmi%7C%D8%AD%D8%B3%D9%8A%D9%86%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AC%D8%B3%D9%85%D9%8A
Nai Barghouti (Palestinian Muslim):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SGL50Qic_Z0&ab_channel=NaiBarghouti%D9%86%D8%A7%D9%8A%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A8%D8%B1%D8%BA%D9%88%D8%AB%D9%8A
————————————————————————————————————–
Folk Music:
Syrian:
Lebanese:
Palestinian:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O6RaxQ6Lydg&ab_channel=Takkat-%D8%AA%D9%83%D9%91%D8%A7%D8%AA
Iraqi:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R3KqCu2Gn08&ab_channel=%D8%B3%D9%83%D8%B1SUGAR
Note: this is an Iraqi folk song performed by a school choir in Damascus.
————————————————————————————————————–
Arabesques:
Turkish Arabesque:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELM7uKFehqI&ab_channel=AvrupaM%C3%BCzik
Note: Turkish-Arabesque is a major sub-set of Turkish music which reached its peak of popularity in the 1960s through to the 90s, but still remains somewhat popular today. In essence, it’s a Turkish adoption of the Arabic style of music. Sometimes (like in the song above) the composition is original and only imitates the Arabic style. Other times it’s an outright Turkish rendition of old Arabic (mostly Levantine) songs by Turks in either Arabic or Turkish, or a mix of both. Some prominent Turkish-Arabesque singers include İbrahim Tatlıses, Neşe Yılmaz (Zara), Sibel Can, Orhan Gencebay, Ferdi Tayfur, Müslüm Gürses, Hakkı Bulut, Ebru Gündeş, Seda Sayan, Zerrin Özer and Azer Bülbül (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arabesque_(Turkish_music)).
Turkish Arabesque 2:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0wlfyU8t4lw&list=PL6bWSO9itU1WnrsEr0Jf3216HCg9_jaq9&index=5&ab_channel=ZM%C3%BCzik
Sephardic-Mizrahi Arabesque:
Note: same thought as Turkish-Arabesque, except Arabic songs are sung mostly by Sephardic/Mizrahi Jews (and occasionally Kavkazi Jews like Sarit Haddad) from Israel (more here: https://www.youtube.com/user/tzuri1983/featured). The songs are sometimes sung in their original Arabic, sometimes in Hebrew, and sometimes a mix of both. The Israelis are pretty good with their Arabic pronunciations – much better than the Turks. (Further reading: https://www.heyalma.com/the-lost-connection-between-israeli-and-turkish-female-musicians/
Western Arabesque:
Note: Arabesque music composed in the Western classical tradition. Strictly speaking, the music is not Arabic in style, nor do I discern any elements which are commonly found in Arabic music. This is isn’t to say Western Arabesque is bad, just that it isn’t Arabic in any meaningful manner. Some eminent composers of Arabesques include Debussy (“Two Arabesques”), Tchaikovsky (“Arabian Dance”), Schumann (“Arabeske in C”), and Tarrege (“Caprico Arabe”).
————————————————————————————————————–
Classical Music:
Andalusian:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ICZ3s1qyvM&ab_channel=%D8%A7%D8%B3%D8%A7%D9%85%D9%87
Andalusian 2:
Ottoman:
Byzantine:
Armenian:
Jerusalem:
Note: this one is my personal favorite. It’s an ode to the sacred city; composed by the Rahbani Brothers, based on the works of Lebanese poet Said Akl, and originally sung by the legendary Fairuz (Lebanese Christian) in 1967. It talks about the loss of Jerusalem; and what it meant to Muslims and Christians in the region. You can also find modern cover versions by Yasmin Ali (Egyptian Muslim) and Dalal Abu-Amneh (Palestinian Muslim).
I think you are right: I enjoy that song played with a guitar more than the more traditional Arab rhythms, even though the modern guitar was indeed introduced to Europe by the Arabs.
I experience something possibly similar with Latin American music. I like tango and some Mexican and Peruvian folk music. But I can't stand tropical rhythms. I don't have your musical knowledge to explain what it is but they sound somehow alien and actually saddening to my ears. A guy once told me that he liked listening to Colombian cumbia while he was working because that cheered him up whereas a minute of that music puts me in a bad mood. For some reason these tropical rhythms are becoming more and more popular in the West though.
At any rate, this Talia girl has superb musical skills.
Is your IslamoPope a Muslim? (1)
Why are you totally committed to Muhammad Francis’s vision? Your IslamoPope is contributing more to the flood of rape-ugees than Putin.
PEACE 😇
__________
(1) https://www.breitbart.com/faith/2022/04/15/pope-francis-we-are-racists-we-are-racists/
Elon Musk’s takeover bid of Twitter has further nosedived in terms of probability of it ever happening. It was never very likely.
Musk has generously offered himself as a fine specimen to prove that technically brilliant autists can easily simultaneously be utter political idiots, as he is. He doesn’t understand how power works in the West and that the Big Tech firms are not motivated by either profits or even ideological conviction in their censorship. They do it because they are told to do it, and openly threatened if they don’t comply.
Zuckerberg and Dorsey never wanted to their platforms to be censors but they never had much say. Musk is now reduced to whining on Twitter how unfair this is and vainly appealing to “shareholders”. It was never about money either. It’s about control.
It has been over 1000 years, since my ancestors prayed to their local clan saint (as in one of them) to kill their viking enemy over the seas, which tactic they averred worked.Replies: @Thulean Friend, @sher singh
Sikhism mostly revolves around getting a visa to Canada these days. Nothing militant about it, except pushy tactics by immigration agents. Their men are getting cucked – and I mean that literally – while abroad.
Even moslems are growing soft. It’s ironic, but Arabs are now often more liberal than many South Asian moslems, especially Afghans but also Pakistanis. Turks give their Pakistani simps an uncomfortable smile as Pakistan’s love campaign for Turkish culture is far from reciprocated.
They say that 133.38 million Pakistanis tuned in to Ertugrul during the first three weeks, which I find really amazing. If I understand correctly, Imran Khan was promoting it for reasons of geopolitics. But it has been banned or attacked in other Muslim countries, where the leaders are at odds with Erdogan.
There will be some America-aligned elements (what Russian nationalists will call "svidomy") attempting to dislodge Chinese influence in Taiwan, but still a balance has to be sought between control and openness and to find ways to reduce or nullify such tendencies. Continuing a working relationship with the KMT will help even if they are being hated by the younger generation. But however, as the American cultural grip in Taiwan continues, there will inevitably be the narrative of "increasing Chinese control", without considering whether the form of control exercised by China is suitable for the conditions of Taiwan or not. No one can help with that!
(Not thinking it thru led to China falling into the failed Color Revolution trap the US set up in HK in 2019-20)Replies: @Sean
In its own back yard a superpower cannot be deterred from invading even a sovereign state. That is the lesson Taiwan will take. It is more a reinforcement because Taiwan has never dared to declare itself an independent sovereign state. They know, because China has publicly said, what the consequences of a unilateral declaration of independence by Taiwan would be.
Defeating an invasion of Taiwan would entail fighting inside what al agree is officially an integral part of China. The US has not even dared to fight inside the completely separate country of Ukraine, let alone on Russian territory. The US is not going to get any great technological advantage is conventional warfare. A vast swarm of meshed drones has been suggested as a conventional defence of Taiwan to enable an invasion to be repelled without use of battlefield nuclear weapons. Like the Chinese with their productive capacity are not going to be able to outnumber any Western drone fleet. It suits China to have Taiwan as a conduit, but China holds all the cards, and Taiwan knows it.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arab Muslims:Nidal Ibourk (Moroccan Muslim):https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vflg8ee2VJ0&ab_channel=NidalIbourkDalal Abu-Amneh (Palestinian Muslim):https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XDr51TRvyAw&t=286s&ab_channel=DalalAbuAmneh-%D8%AF%D9%84%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A3%D8%A8%D9%88%D8%A2%D9%85%D9%86%D8%A9Hussein Al-Jasmi (Emirati Muslim):https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9UZ8eu6HFDk&ab_channel=HussainAlJassmi%7C%D8%AD%D8%B3%D9%8A%D9%86%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AC%D8%B3%D9%85%D9%8ANai Barghouti (Palestinian Muslim):https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SGL50Qic_Z0&ab_channel=NaiBarghouti%D9%86%D8%A7%D9%8A%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A8%D8%B1%D8%BA%D9%88%D8%AB%D9%8A--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Folk Music:Syrian:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VGUdcmb5QOU&ab_channel=ZeinAl-Jundi-Topic
Lebanese:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JLjBTsizW68&ab_channel=CemHicaziPalestinian:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O6RaxQ6Lydg&ab_channel=Takkat-%D8%AA%D9%83%D9%91%D8%A7%D8%AAIraqi:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R3KqCu2Gn08&ab_channel=%D8%B3%D9%83%D8%B1SUGARNote: this is an Iraqi folk song performed by a school choir in Damascus.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arabesques:Turkish Arabesque:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELM7uKFehqI&ab_channel=AvrupaM%C3%BCzikNote: Turkish-Arabesque is a major sub-set of Turkish music which reached its peak of popularity in the 1960s through to the 90s, but still remains somewhat popular today. In essence, it’s a Turkish adoption of the Arabic style of music. Sometimes (like in the song above) the composition is original and only imitates the Arabic style. Other times it’s an outright Turkish rendition of old Arabic (mostly Levantine) songs by Turks in either Arabic or Turkish, or a mix of both. Some prominent Turkish-Arabesque singers include İbrahim Tatlıses, Neşe Yılmaz (Zara), Sibel Can, Orhan Gencebay, Ferdi Tayfur, Müslüm Gürses, Hakkı Bulut, Ebru Gündeş, Seda Sayan, Zerrin Özer and Azer Bülbül (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arabesque_(Turkish_music)).Turkish Arabesque 2:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0wlfyU8t4lw&list=PL6bWSO9itU1WnrsEr0Jf3216HCg9_jaq9&index=5&ab_channel=ZM%C3%BCzikSephardic-Mizrahi Arabesque: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VW_6vnwazwc&ab_channel=zig123izeNote: same thought as Turkish-Arabesque, except Arabic songs are sung mostly by Sephardic/Mizrahi Jews (and occasionally Kavkazi Jews like Sarit Haddad) from Israel (more here: https://www.youtube.com/user/tzuri1983/featured). The songs are sometimes sung in their original Arabic, sometimes in Hebrew, and sometimes a mix of both. The Israelis are pretty good with their Arabic pronunciations - much better than the Turks. (Further reading: https://www.heyalma.com/the-lost-connection-between-israeli-and-turkish-female-musicians/ Western Arabesque:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y_goHl-GuNk&ab_channel=Fledermaus1990Note: Arabesque music composed in the Western classical tradition. Strictly speaking, the music is not Arabic in style, nor do I discern any elements which are commonly found in Arabic music. This is isn’t to say Western Arabesque is bad, just that it isn’t Arabic in any meaningful manner. Some eminent composers of Arabesques include Debussy (“Two Arabesques”), Tchaikovsky (“Arabian Dance”), Schumann (“Arabeske in C”), and Tarrege (“Caprico Arabe”).--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Classical Music:Andalusian:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ICZ3s1qyvM&ab_channel=%D8%A7%D8%B3%D8%A7%D9%85%D9%87Andalusian 2:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nEsaQXj7JhE&ab_channel=AndreHajjOttoman:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MTkYGC58C-w&list=OLAK5uy_lxtu-AS_YuyyprPpFCaV8pyhixjyc9tqM&index=6&ab_channel=ClassicalArabicOrchestraofAleppo-TopicByzantine:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bqhen0OfB3E&t=1sArmenian:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_4OI0wBZzk&ab_channel=VanoushKhanamirian-TopicJerusalem:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vowbT3hqy0o&ab_channel=MohCoolManNote: this one is my personal favorite. It's an ode to the sacred city; composed by the Rahbani Brothers, based on the works of Lebanese poet Said Akl, and originally sung by the legendary Fairuz (Lebanese Christian) in 1967. It talks about the loss of Jerusalem; and what it meant to Muslims and Christians in the region. You can also find modern cover versions by Yasmin Ali (Egyptian Muslim) and Dalal Abu-Amneh (Palestinian Muslim).Replies: @Mikel
Shukrun.
I think you are right: I enjoy that song played with a guitar more than the more traditional Arab rhythms, even though the modern guitar was indeed introduced to Europe by the Arabs.
I experience something possibly similar with Latin American music. I like tango and some Mexican and Peruvian folk music. But I can’t stand tropical rhythms. I don’t have your musical knowledge to explain what it is but they sound somehow alien and actually saddening to my ears. A guy once told me that he liked listening to Colombian cumbia while he was working because that cheered him up whereas a minute of that music puts me in a bad mood. For some reason these tropical rhythms are becoming more and more popular in the West though.
At any rate, this Talia girl has superb musical skills.
It has been over 1000 years, since my ancestors prayed to their local clan saint (as in one of them) to kill their viking enemy over the seas, which tactic they averred worked.Replies: @Thulean Friend, @sher singh
Any man can lift & carry weapons though –
Pitamah Bhishma roared: “Kshatriya Dharma is unique. It has no memory. Not of sins, past births or failings” Fight bravely, and force Indra to share his throne. Even the gods envy the death of a Kshatriya on the battlefield”
https://www.manglacharan.com/post/three-paths-to-liberation-and-the-gobind-gita
ਤਾਹਿ ਮੁਕਤ ਹਰ ਹਾਲਤ ਮਾਈ ॥ ਸੁਨਹੁ ਖਾਲਸਾ ਜੀ ਸਕ ਨਾਹੀ ॥ ਛਤ੍ਰ ਪੰਥ ਯਹ ਅਸ ਧੁਜ ਕੀਨਾ ॥ ਮਾਤਾ ਮਹਾ ਕਾਲਿਕਾ ਦੀਨਾ ॥7॥
These are the ways to liberation, listen Khalsa and do not doubt. The path of the warrior under the Sword, The Mother the Great Death has Herself ordained||
ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ
Even moslems are growing soft. It's ironic, but Arabs are now often more liberal than many South Asian moslems, especially Afghans but also Pakistanis. Turks give their Pakistani simps an uncomfortable smile as Pakistan's love campaign for Turkish culture is far from reciprocated.Replies: @sher singh, @songbird
I also feel this strange disconnect. One thought that I've had is that I'm not even sure what the names of some of my recent ancestors were, as I'm not sure if they really used the English names that were given to them in the records.
I don't know if anyone would do it, but I'd like to see Blasket Island resettled with Irish speakers.
What I find really alarming now is that migrants are being settled directly in the Irish-speaking areas - it seems obvious to me, by design, to expunge them.Replies: @S
Yes, that’s sadly so. And how historically this has worked as succinctly described in a 2003 academic paper:
‘..the immigrants usually serve three main functions: cheap labor to replace native groups; settlement on the ‘frontier’ (periphery); and control over the natives and their land. These dynamics generally result in the maintenance of hegemony..’
https://www.academia.edu/27219183/Between_urban_and_national_Political_mobilization_among_Mizrahim_in_Israel_s_development_towns_
The pride of the Russian fleet, the battleship Moskva, was recently sunk in the Black Sea by neptune missiles, as reported by president Zelensky. The ship was one of the largest warships in the world, costing somewhere in the vicinity of $750 million. This was not just a huge symbolic victory for the Ukrainians, but a real tactical one too, as all Russian ships have been moved back to spots further away from the Ukrainian shores. The newly minted postage stamp converys the Ukrainian mood. And although all the kremin stooges here have already started to celebrate the great Russian victory, as far as I know, a small remnant of the Azov battalion is still stubbornly encamped, fighting away in Mariupol. Russian “victories” are all being carefully cataloged including many cowardly acts of violence perpetrated against civilians that are being unburied every day. Glory to Ukraine!
Yes, that’s a Ukrainian soldier giving a Russian warship his middle finger. 🙂
Hindu police in the neighbouring state stopped Sikh pilgrims and removed their religious flags.
In response for weeks all commercial traffic has been blocked & Sikhs have been openly going to the state in large armed bands challenging the police.
No ‘militancy’
ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ
Some would be better off listening to their momz and/or grandma:
https://tw.appledaily.com/resizer/lIAz7R3IKrESVawhoh9RYXKnFW8=/arc-photo-appledaily/ap-ne-1-prod/public/AUTBLYKP3NDYRCPC6Q6TIPAPQQ.jpgReplies: @sher singh, @Mikhail
Yeah, but plan was superb though for geting flowers from commie flag waving nostalgia patients ;)Replies: @Mikhail
https://twitter.com/DerbyChrisW/status/1514860656834527235Replies: @Mr. Hack, @sudden death
She was understandably upset because she was the last person in line at the local post office when the newly minted postage stamps were sold out. Be sure to put in your order Mickey because they’re going like hotcakes. 🙂
I can understand the desire to avoid assimilation.
A triune union would be best where all 3 brother's nation can maintain autonomy. :shrug: I guess elite's do determine a nation's direction. US & UKR are close since they're both owned by JewsReplies: @Mr. Hack
https://twitter.com/DerbyChrisW/status/1514860656834527235Replies: @Mr. Hack, @sudden death
It seems that RF politico-military masterminds somehow really managed to forget that there are not only just Sovok babushkas living in UA while planing the super guick victorious reconquista for the ages, lol
Yeah, but plan was superb though for geting flowers from commie flag waving nostalgia patients 😉
:)
It’s the flagship of the Black Sea Fleet. There will be others.
https://images-cdn.9gag.com/photo/apgb0N8_700b.jpg
Boris Johnson is partly Circassian.
Ukraine traditionally has had lower violent crime rate and lower alcohol consumption rate than Russia. Violence in Volhynia was purposeful not random. Did Volhynians hate Germans?
So your claim that Ukrainians were as violent as Russians in Germany is likely false unless you have evidence to contrary. Do you, or are you lying again, your new pattern?Replies: @Yevardian
AP, you’re one of the best commenters still here, but you really are doing a sterling job of proving utu’s point. What is it with Slavic nationalisms and the narcissism of small differences?
You may be right but I see a couple of problems with trying to modify society:
– I can’t think of any viable or even desirable alternative that could be put into a manifesto. In general, all times in the past were probably worse than this one from the perspective of being able to lead a happy life. The 60s and early 70s must have been a wonderful time to be alive in the US (as long as you were not sent to Vietnam) but other than that, I can’t think of any time that I would prefer to the current one.
Social pressure certainly exists to conform to a pretty uniform life style that is very unsatisfactory for many of us but that is our problem, not society’s. If we really want to, we can lead almost any kind of live we want and society is not going to stop us. It’s not just that we can join a hippie or Amish community or subsist from the land on a homestead. Some people in Alaska and in isolated cabins around the West lead almost a hunter-gatherer lifestyle and some of them are even promoted on popular TV programs as modern-day heroes. All of this with the huge advantage that our ancestors didn’t have of going back to the boring but secure modern lifestyle if we change our mind or things get ugly.
– I have enough of a problem convincing my two adult children of what they should do for what I see as their own good. If I cannot even convince my children to change their lives, who am I to start planning full societal changes?
– As we’ve discussed in the past, and Silviosilver recently mentioned, if we managed to convince a large amount of people to lead a better life by leaving their jobs and simplifying their existence, we would could actually cause a big economic harm to many people that do not share our perspective for no real benefit for us. Our ability to enjoy life in contact with nature while making use of so many technological advances that you and I are so used to (for example, exchanging our ideas through the internet) depends on the majority of society leading the lifestyle that we reject.
I like reading your posts because you often present ideas that make me reevaluate how well I am doing in my old dream of leading a fulfilling life close to the beautiful places that I love. But extrapolating those ideas from the personal to the social sphere is another matter altogether.
No need to apologize for not having the time to respond! Is that lack of time not punishment enough on its own?
https://tw.appledaily.com/resizer/lIAz7R3IKrESVawhoh9RYXKnFW8=/arc-photo-appledaily/ap-ne-1-prod/public/AUTBLYKP3NDYRCPC6Q6TIPAPQQ.jpgReplies: @sher singh, @Mikhail
I think she’s right I don’t see the point of this; it’s a brother’s war.
I can understand the desire to avoid assimilation.
A triune union would be best where all 3 brother’s nation can maintain autonomy. :shrug: I guess elite’s do determine a nation’s direction. US & UKR are close since they’re both owned by Jews
The Warsaw Pact was the Inter-War years. Gave civilised Europe a break from the Slavs. Counterintuitive perhaps, but the Communist system prevented these strange folk from flooding into Best Europe.
Next week probably, huh?
I can understand the desire to avoid assimilation.
A triune union would be best where all 3 brother's nation can maintain autonomy. :shrug: I guess elite's do determine a nation's direction. US & UKR are close since they're both owned by JewsReplies: @Mr. Hack
What rock have you been sleeping under? Putin is not trying to create a triune theory based on firm principles of autonomy. He’s looking for and decimating small towns full of “Nazis” that just happen to be mostly filled with the elderly, women and children. He’s not backed off from his “Nazi” hunting efforts, and if you support him you need to fall into line and get with the program.
War is a part of existence we'll help people but numb to political outrage.We never believed in things like nation states, rights or civility. Neither were they granted us. :)
My takeaway tactically is I wonder on the state of Indian or Chinese military or a number of other ones.ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ
I made a comment and was accused of dishonesty. So I am pointing out that my comment as not inaccurate. Utu claimed that about 1/3 of Red Army atrocities were made by Ukrainians – a serious charge that requires evidence.
…which instead got many wonderful other very compatible nationalities like Turks 😉
I’m just speaking on ideals I’m not invested in any side. My community does fine East or West 🙂
War is a part of existence we’ll help people but numb to political outrage.
We never believed in things like nation states, rights or civility. Neither were they granted us. 🙂
My takeaway tactically is I wonder on the state of Indian or Chinese military or a number of other ones.
ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ
Cold War was quite the conjuring trick was it not?
I think you may be conflating utu’s allegation that AP is a Ukraine partisan/ propagandist with the idea that it makes him an unworthy or lesser commenter. That is not necessarily the case. AK was a shameless Putin/ Russian partisan and was still worthwhile reading. Sher Singh is a committed Sikh partisan and YellowfaceAnon has called himself a China shill.
None of these things make them any less worthwhile reading, nor is it objectionable to point out that they have biases and loyalties. We all do, as does AP. Sometimes this may lead him or any of us to make dubious claims in support of those loyalties.
I didn’t see any character assassination in utu’s comment. Fer’ cryin’ out loud, it’s utu we’re talking about. If he wanted to commit a character assassination I’m pretty sure he would have been a lot more blunt force about it!
Yeah, but plan was superb though for geting flowers from commie flag waving nostalgia patients ;)Replies: @Mikhail
In svido circles, there’s a tendency to hype pro-Russian with pro-Soviet sentiment. Granted, that does exist to a degree. I know a Ukrainian sovok who opposes the post-Soviet Russian government. Among svidos and sovoks, I’m a proud minority.
🙂
https://tw.appledaily.com/resizer/lIAz7R3IKrESVawhoh9RYXKnFW8=/arc-photo-appledaily/ap-ne-1-prod/public/AUTBLYKP3NDYRCPC6Q6TIPAPQQ.jpgReplies: @sher singh, @Mikhail
That’s a really classy and clever stamp, which you should be proud of.
I’ve been told this thread is getting sluggish, so here’s a new one:
https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-185-russia-ukraine/
None of these things make them any less worthwhile reading, nor is it objectionable to point out that they have biases and loyalties. We all do, as does AP. Sometimes this may lead him or any of us to make dubious claims in support of those loyalties.
I didn't see any character assassination in utu's comment. Fer' cryin' out loud, it's utu we're talking about. If he wanted to commit a character assassination I'm pretty sure he would have been a lot more blunt force about it!Replies: @Mr. Hack
It wasn’t just utu’s uncomplimentary mischaracterization of AP’s input that rubbed me the wrong way, but his long rant against Ukrainian history, culture etc that squarely fits within any application of classical Ukrainophobic criteria.
Even moslems are growing soft. It's ironic, but Arabs are now often more liberal than many South Asian moslems, especially Afghans but also Pakistanis. Turks give their Pakistani simps an uncomfortable smile as Pakistan's love campaign for Turkish culture is far from reciprocated.Replies: @sher singh, @songbird
I’ve heard Pakistan banned Bollywood.
They say that 133.38 million Pakistanis tuned in to Ertugrul during the first three weeks, which I find really amazing. If I understand correctly, Imran Khan was promoting it for reasons of geopolitics. But it has been banned or attacked in other Muslim countries, where the leaders are at odds with Erdogan.
Defeating an invasion of Taiwan would entail fighting inside what al agree is officially an integral part of China. The US has not even dared to fight inside the completely separate country of Ukraine, let alone on Russian territory. The US is not going to get any great technological advantage is conventional warfare. A vast swarm of meshed drones has been suggested as a conventional defence of Taiwan to enable an invasion to be repelled without use of battlefield nuclear weapons. Like the Chinese with their productive capacity are not going to be able to outnumber any Western drone fleet. It suits China to have Taiwan as a conduit, but China holds all the cards, and Taiwan knows it.Replies: @Yellowface Anon
Are we talking about China responding to American and/or Taiwanese provocation that crosses the line, or something unilateral like the Russian invasion?
Military reunification is as legitimate as the Azerbaijani war on Karabagh (Taiwan has very few international recognition) and American sanctions on China over this is criminal.
AP was (self)assigned to Karlin blog do defend Ukrainian interests against mostly Russian prejudice. His job is easier than that of Jack D because hardly anybody knows anything about Ukrainians and for outsiders squabbles between Russians and Ukrainians are just as silly and meaningless as between Macedonians and Bulgarians and Serbians. However otoh Russia is in much better position because people know much more about it while Ukrainians are almost a blank slate. So professional Ukrainians can and must be more creative when inventing accomplishments they never had and famous figures who for strange reason are totally obscure and most importantly to work very hard on Ukrainian ethnogenesis and foundational myths to invent biological, linguistic and cultural separation from Russians.
Because of the difference between their subjects. Jak D and AP jobs are significantly different. The former is chiefly fending off accusations that Jews did something meaning that Jews were too active in history while AP deals with opposite that Ukrainians were too passive to the point they did nothing or that they did not exist. Fortunately for him in here in the righto-sphere accusation of cooperation with Nazis, holocaust and genocide were never in vogue because these are areas where Ukrainians actually excelled.
The jobs that Jack D and AP got themselves require talents where the adherence to truth is not of the highest order. Rhetorical effectiveness is what counts You must be ruthless and unscrupulous which comes under the guise of shameless chutzpah.
Most recent AP's invention was that Ukrainians in Red Army during WWII were less brutal than Russians and other ethnic groups and thus German_reader and all other Germans should love Ukrainians more. And as his strongest proof for his hypothesis he offered this:
"I have seen no evidence that Ukrainians engaged in the behavior in Germany to the extent that Russians or especially non-Slavs did. "
This is exactly what you expect from a professional Ukrainian: a faith based reality.
One could forward several arguments that brutality of Ukrainians was actually worse than Russians beginning with Karlin HBDism that Ukrainians have lower IQ than Russians and thus are more likely to engage in brutal acts
or
that Ukrainians after strong and very enthusiastic involvement in Holocaust and genocide of Poles were much more skillful rapists and butchers who already overcame all human inhibitions against murder and rape than Russians. By the end of WWII 40% of soldiers in Red Army were Ukrainians. 10% of all Ukrainians were drafted to Red Army however the highest proportion (16%) was from Volhynia where the pool of draftees consisted of experienced murderers and rapists.Replies: @Mr. Hack, @AP, @Dmitry
While you can argue for internal assignation theory, AP’s political views are too idiosyncratic for external assignation theory to be likely.
Ukraine is popular now, because people are viewing it as nationalist democratic citizens being invaded by imperialist dictatorship’s multinational mercenaries. It is following the archetype of the film “300”, where the Persian Emperor’s multinational slaves attack the Greece’s free citizens.
By comparison, AP’s views in the forum often include the opposite of what would promote anyone to support Ukraine. He was sometimes supporting dictatorships and empires against democracies, opposing rebellions against dictatorship, support for conquistadors invading America, support for Potemkin villages in Russia, belief in theory of demons as explanation for historical events.
He was also arguing for “Just World Hypothesis”, where sad events happen for people, because of sins of their history, while increases in their power are a result of “virtuous” (but not in Christian sense) decisions. It’s how Aztecs or Hindus might be believing, but it is anti-Christian, and will especially not be something you want to promote Ukraine, as Ukraine is a region which had some of the most sad historical and contemporary events.
https://www.unz.com/akarlin/sixth-proof/#comment-3210903
It’s common to view the Eastern European region as cursed (this is one of the themes of Bram Stoker’s “Dracula”), but if you applied AP’s “Just World Hypothesis”, then such curses would be not encouraging sympathy for the people of this region, as their sins would be the cause of the curses.
Not to remove their individuality, but they are from a similar culture.
Jack D and AP are North-East Americans (one in New England, another in New Jersey), from origin in the region of Lvov. Jack D says his parents are from villages there. https://www.unz.com/isteve/new-frontiers-in-reverential-capitalization/#comment-5182586
They both sound like wealthy American paterfamilias, that love dogs, support Trump, dislike what will be the liberal content of their children’s elite education.
Compared to AP, Jack D has less sentimental views about the massacres in his home region (https://www.unz.com/isteve/democrat-pols-vulnerable-to-their-own-mobs/#comment-2035122).
Jack D doesn’t believe in the “Just World Hypothesis” either. He is more cynical about the history.
Jack D has obsessive racist views against African Americans and believes his dog also dislikes African Americans (https://www.unz.com/isteve/dueling-search-engines-was-kamala-harris-an-anchor-baby/#comment-4161474).
Jack D writes like an engineer and also appreciates anglosaxon democratic culture. But I guess his main theme is racism against African Americans, with added racism in support of Galician Jews.
AP is obviously a more sympathetic writer, as he is more friendly, writes about positive things usually.
As for tribal support for ethnic groups, this is apparently socially encouraged culture (?) for post Ellis Island immigrants in East states of the USA. AP was writing about how his neighbors’ children volunteered to join the Israeli army.
Is this something very American in the understanding of history? They choose a good and a bad side. There is something similar in Russian culture. It’s perhaps a result of being a powerful empire.
Although Jews in medieval and early modern times had survived by their alliance to the aristocracy, eventually their birth rate was too high, and the majority were poor villagers.
In the 18th century, the anti-Jewish accusation, was that they are racist, insular villagers, with provincial taste, stubborn, marry their cousin, believe primitive superstition, reject reason as they had rejected Christianity before.
The problem of Jews for European Enlightenment, was they represented anti-universalism. This is a common view, in texts of Gibbon, even in 19th century texts of Schopenhauer.
In 19th century, the anti-Jewish view is still that they are lower class, provincial villagers, but there is extremely rapid embourgeoisement of parts of the Jewish population, as well as urbanization of secularizing Jews. Then there is the sense this is fake, imitation acculturation, not like German’s rooted in authentic society (e.g. Wagner’s writings).
Secularizing Jewish culture was very sensitive to this sense of lower class origin in the 19th century, and it why the children were disproportionately studying classical music (so by the 20th century, a majority of world’s classical music stars are Jewish). European urban sophistication became religion of the secularizing Jewish culture. Karl Marx, was asking people like Engels to send him money, so he could pay for his daughters’ music lessons.
In the more undeveloped regions, there is still a nostalgia of lower class Jewish culture (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JxCJrff9TLw.).
But American Jewish, non-Orthodox organizations, are representing elite views and speak with Enlightenment language. They talk with “Noblesse oblige”.
Except in terms of their mission to support Israel or Jewish groups, they promote Afghan women. They like to increase diversity of Jewish culture (https://twitter.com/ADL/status/1513162121458053120.). They are kind of sophisticated and universalist sounding, which people like Ivanka Trump (from expensive schools), would not be embarrassed for.
So, where is position for some e.g. Jack D, who seems like the old intolerant stereotype? It’s not likely anyone would employ him as troll. Would you pay someone to write like a villager from Sholem Aleichem story, who rejects his daughter for marrying a Christian man?
If you are employing professional Jewish commentator, they would not be Jack D, but African American Jews, with fashionable education in Dartmouth University, and they would write emotional comments about how they are eating passover food this year with LGBT Ukrainian refugees.
There are also some very silly points you make. Do you really believe that African Jew would serve the Jewish cause the best at a racialist anti-Black blog of Sailer? Have you thought that through?
You seem to totally under appreciate the role of Orthodox and conservative Jews and instead resort to anti-Semitic tropes that all Jews are liberal and will act liberal and support gays and trannies and BLM and this is the only path for Jews. So you want to diminish Jack D effectiveness because his father lived in small town in pre WW II Poland and so Jack D is more like a relic form Sholem Aleichim stories who will have no compelling appeal on a conservative blog. Really, that is what you think? Though I am sure Jack D as a relic does not know as much about what shoes are fashionable as you do so you might be right about his lack of appeal on the sites where you spend remaining 90% of time apart from the unz-dot-com.
Pointing out to the diversity of AP's ideas that he had expressed in the past even if some of them might be somewhat counterproductive (in your opinion) to Ukrainian chauvinism is really naive and simplistic as if you believed that people can be really consistent and could predict all consequences of what they said on various occasions with respect to their overall outlook and objective. AP has a rich personality, wide interests and knowledge but this does not change the fact that he deserves to be labeled as the "professional Ukrainian." If you said that Ukrainians do not eat as many watermelons as Russians I am pretty sure that he would dig up a statistic somewhere to correct your misconception or compensate it with statistic of eating delicious squash where Ukrainian may exceed Russian consumption. Such diligence and earnestness are a hallmark of a "professional Ethnic".
The issue that you haven't addressed which really got me started to zoom in on AP is his shameless proposition which apparently he doubles down as if he really believed it that Ukrainian soldiers in Red Army in WWII and specifically in Germany behaved better than Russian soldiers. And he uses a peculiar illogic that because it was not demonstrated otherwise it must be true. Though he conveniently forgets that by his illogic it is possible that Ukrainians behaved worse than Russians. German_reader and I dismissed his nonsense believing that the military culture of Red Army was the most dominant and equalizing factor.
Yervadian, suggested that this kind of superiority over Russians is a delusion that he cherishes or in other words of Luke from NT: "for of the abundance of his heart his mouth speaketh." But I have problem believing it that intelligent, educated and not that young person would be still in the grip of "idealized parental imago" that compensates the loss of narcissistic perfection of a child. Parental because idealization formation with respect to one's ethnic group is of similar nature and usually affect less intelligent, less educated and more primitive people.
The mechanism of AC screw up does not come form his delusion (he is smart and too savvy for it) but from the need for propagandistic manipulation for this very time: here and now during the war.
We hear of Russian atrocities in Ukraine and some excitable people as well as calculating propagandists want to vilify the whole nation of Russians by connecting it to Red Army behavior during WWII and in Germany in particular. As we know Germany was not very supportive of Ukrainian independence and even colluded with Putin even though Germany is Ukrainians' first and the only love mostly unrequited through their history with exception of brief periods of cock teasing.
Vilification of Russia in eyes of Germany is necessary but one must circumvent the mine that has been laying there since 1945 of Ukrainian high (40%) participation in Red Army in the last phase of WWII. You must come up with a fantasy that in the current climate of war, the times of lies and excitement may get a traction that while Russian soldiers were raping German women and executing boys from Volkssturm Ukrainian soldiers in the same Red Army were helping old German women get food and water and cross the road and singing lullabies to German orphans. I am afraid that some silly German may even buy this Ukrainian Haggadah perhaps even out of guilt for being fooled by Putin for so many yearsReplies: @Dmitry
Medvedev has more skill to pretend to have “aura of dignity”, as you could listen to him speak for probably even an hour, and almost maintain the fake illusion you are listening to a servant of the people.
Whereas Putin can try to speak like this, but more than 10 or 15 minutes, he will not resist saying some vulgar jokes, where it’s impossible not to throw away the illusion, and remember you are listening to a police man or prison guard.
Medvedev’s appearance is also more like a normal European person, whereas after plastic surgery Putin’s face started to become something you frighten children with, as Sechin.
https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-170/#comment-5045616 (It’s useful for power to have a friendly face and scary face, but in the end it is better to be feared than to be loved, and the halloween mask of certain politicians’ faces are perhaps not unuseful for them for this reason).
Of course, 2008-2012, was the moment in a hostage situation, when the Mexican kidnapping gang, relax and do not show their guns, get hostages the cup of tea, start to joke, imagine they are your friend. Hostages can forget their lack of power, and it’s not much different than if they were sitting at home.
Most of the time, the life in the police state is not much different to the life in the liberal democracy, especially if you don’t think about it. It’s really a minority of the time, when there is stress in the society, when the illusion cannot be maintained. But these moments of the stress in the society, are psychologically uncomfortable, as the real situation and lack of power cannot be distracted from. But in times of relaxation in between, your distraction can continue for years.
He was repeating tropes that are typical of traditional Polish views, and there is some truth in what he wrote: while Ukraine (when it was part of Rus) with its Byzantine heritage was more advanced than Poland in medieval times by the Renaissance it had fallen behind, thus nation-builders were converting. His extreme bitterness about the horrible Volyn massacre is also telling.
There is a certain difference with Spain and Portugal, generally with Western Europe; the Western authoritarians tended to be more open and explicit in their rejection of liberal democracy, whereas Luka will tend to portray himself as a kind of great democrat, close to the people, with humanitarian views, talk about constitutional legality and the supervisory organs of the state, probably this is part of the Soviet inheritance. My wife gets exasperated by this, but it is quite an effective technology for disrupting opposition.
This is pretty important, if Spanish and Portuguese people from the early 70s could be made into modern Europeans in around 20/25 years, you would think with younger Belarusians (I guess Ukrainians also) born in the 90s or 2000s it would be easier.
It even looked like things could be starting in this direction in Belarus before the 2020 election but the opposition movement was squashed, now following the Ukrainian war there seems low probability of it.
I think the British response was marked by its mixed nature, partly they conceded power, partly they expanded it in other directions (this period must be exceptional with how dynamic and expansive British power was becoming), they were both liberal but at the same time could seem like they were channelling a more reasonable and less enraged de Maistre.
I’ve been surprised by how resourceful the Belarusian regime was (though not in the direction of creating modern Europeans, in preserving itself), following the huge protests and the ferment, I was thinking it would be their 25th April like the Portuguese Revolution in 1974, somehow it seems there is a gap between the more liberal part of the population, the state and another more Sovok part outside the capital.
https://www.unz.com/akarlin/sixth-proof/#comment-3210903 It's common to view the Eastern European region as cursed (this is one of the themes of Bram Stoker's "Dracula"), but if you applied AP's "Just World Hypothesis", then such curses would be not encouraging sympathy for the people of this region, as their sins would be the cause of the curses. Not to remove their individuality, but they are from a similar culture. Jack D and AP are North-East Americans (one in New England, another in New Jersey), from origin in the region of Lvov. Jack D says his parents are from villages there. https://www.unz.com/isteve/new-frontiers-in-reverential-capitalization/#comment-5182586They both sound like wealthy American paterfamilias, that love dogs, support Trump, dislike what will be the liberal content of their children's elite education. Compared to AP, Jack D has less sentimental views about the massacres in his home region (https://www.unz.com/isteve/democrat-pols-vulnerable-to-their-own-mobs/#comment-2035122). Jack D doesn't believe in the "Just World Hypothesis" either. He is more cynical about the history. Jack D has obsessive racist views against African Americans and believes his dog also dislikes African Americans (https://www.unz.com/isteve/dueling-search-engines-was-kamala-harris-an-anchor-baby/#comment-4161474). Jack D writes like an engineer and also appreciates anglosaxon democratic culture. But I guess his main theme is racism against African Americans, with added racism in support of Galician Jews. AP is obviously a more sympathetic writer, as he is more friendly, writes about positive things usually. As for tribal support for ethnic groups, this is apparently socially encouraged culture (?) for post Ellis Island immigrants in East states of the USA. AP was writing about how his neighbors' children volunteered to join the Israeli army. Is this something very American in the understanding of history? They choose a good and a bad side. There is something similar in Russian culture. It's perhaps a result of being a powerful empire. Although Jews in medieval and early modern times had survived by their alliance to the aristocracy, eventually their birth rate was too high, and the majority were poor villagers. In the 18th century, the anti-Jewish accusation, was that they are racist, insular villagers, with provincial taste, stubborn, marry their cousin, believe primitive superstition, reject reason as they had rejected Christianity before. The problem of Jews for European Enlightenment, was they represented anti-universalism. This is a common view, in texts of Gibbon, even in 19th century texts of Schopenhauer. In 19th century, the anti-Jewish view is still that they are lower class, provincial villagers, but there is extremely rapid embourgeoisement of parts of the Jewish population, as well as urbanization of secularizing Jews. Then there is the sense this is fake, imitation acculturation, not like German's rooted in authentic society (e.g. Wagner's writings).
Secularizing Jewish culture was very sensitive to this sense of lower class origin in the 19th century, and it why the children were disproportionately studying classical music (so by the 20th century, a majority of world's classical music stars are Jewish). European urban sophistication became religion of the secularizing Jewish culture. Karl Marx, was asking people like Engels to send him money, so he could pay for his daughters' music lessons. In the more undeveloped regions, there is still a nostalgia of lower class Jewish culture (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JxCJrff9TLw.). But American Jewish, non-Orthodox organizations, are representing elite views and speak with Enlightenment language. They talk with "Noblesse oblige".Except in terms of their mission to support Israel or Jewish groups, they promote Afghan women. They like to increase diversity of Jewish culture (https://twitter.com/ADL/status/1513162121458053120.). They are kind of sophisticated and universalist sounding, which people like Ivanka Trump (from expensive schools), would not be embarrassed for. So, where is position for some e.g. Jack D, who seems like the old intolerant stereotype? It's not likely anyone would employ him as troll. Would you pay someone to write like a villager from Sholem Aleichem story, who rejects his daughter for marrying a Christian man? If you are employing professional Jewish commentator, they would not be Jack D, but African American Jews, with fashionable education in Dartmouth University, and they would write emotional comments about how they are eating passover food this year with LGBT Ukrainian refugees.Replies: @utu
Dmitry, Dmitry, often you demonstrate that your aim is not good, or you do not even recognize what is your target from, I suppose, an inattentive reading of comment you respond to and then you resort to shot gun approach where you throw everything you know and everything you think you know at your interlocutor. So I won’t go point by point. I will just remind you that when I wrote “professional Jew” and “professional Ukrainian” I wrote it on purpose in quotation marks to not imply that either Jack D or AP are paid commenters. They could be but I do not know it and I do not insinuate it. It is a state of mind and purpose that sometimes can be remunerated but it is not necessary. At some point of your earlier incarnation here at Karlin’s blog you acted as a “professional Israeli neophyte” when you were very defensive of everything about Israel and most of all of your knowledge of Israel that you knew it best because you lived there and even acquired citizenship of Israel. There are quite a few Blacks who act as “professional Blacks” because they think that way and can’t think other way because being Black is more important for them than being normal human being w/o ethnic adjectives and there si some many things around them that triggers them so they can never quit their “profession” of being Black but they are not necessarily associated with any particular Black organization. They just think that way because their mental space is filled with templates that makes them think that way.
There are also some very silly points you make. Do you really believe that African Jew would serve the Jewish cause the best at a racialist anti-Black blog of Sailer? Have you thought that through?
You seem to totally under appreciate the role of Orthodox and conservative Jews and instead resort to anti-Semitic tropes that all Jews are liberal and will act liberal and support gays and trannies and BLM and this is the only path for Jews. So you want to diminish Jack D effectiveness because his father lived in small town in pre WW II Poland and so Jack D is more like a relic form Sholem Aleichim stories who will have no compelling appeal on a conservative blog. Really, that is what you think? Though I am sure Jack D as a relic does not know as much about what shoes are fashionable as you do so you might be right about his lack of appeal on the sites where you spend remaining 90% of time apart from the unz-dot-com.
Pointing out to the diversity of AP’s ideas that he had expressed in the past even if some of them might be somewhat counterproductive (in your opinion) to Ukrainian chauvinism is really naive and simplistic as if you believed that people can be really consistent and could predict all consequences of what they said on various occasions with respect to their overall outlook and objective. AP has a rich personality, wide interests and knowledge but this does not change the fact that he deserves to be labeled as the “professional Ukrainian.” If you said that Ukrainians do not eat as many watermelons as Russians I am pretty sure that he would dig up a statistic somewhere to correct your misconception or compensate it with statistic of eating delicious squash where Ukrainian may exceed Russian consumption. Such diligence and earnestness are a hallmark of a “professional Ethnic“.
The issue that you haven’t addressed which really got me started to zoom in on AP is his shameless proposition which apparently he doubles down as if he really believed it that Ukrainian soldiers in Red Army in WWII and specifically in Germany behaved better than Russian soldiers. And he uses a peculiar illogic that because it was not demonstrated otherwise it must be true. Though he conveniently forgets that by his illogic it is possible that Ukrainians behaved worse than Russians. German_reader and I dismissed his nonsense believing that the military culture of Red Army was the most dominant and equalizing factor.
Yervadian, suggested that this kind of superiority over Russians is a delusion that he cherishes or in other words of Luke from NT: “for of the abundance of his heart his mouth speaketh.” But I have problem believing it that intelligent, educated and not that young person would be still in the grip of “idealized parental imago” that compensates the loss of narcissistic perfection of a child. Parental because idealization formation with respect to one’s ethnic group is of similar nature and usually affect less intelligent, less educated and more primitive people.
The mechanism of AC screw up does not come form his delusion (he is smart and too savvy for it) but from the need for propagandistic manipulation for this very time: here and now during the war.
We hear of Russian atrocities in Ukraine and some excitable people as well as calculating propagandists want to vilify the whole nation of Russians by connecting it to Red Army behavior during WWII and in Germany in particular. As we know Germany was not very supportive of Ukrainian independence and even colluded with Putin even though Germany is Ukrainians’ first and the only love mostly unrequited through their history with exception of brief periods of cock teasing.
Vilification of Russia in eyes of Germany is necessary but one must circumvent the mine that has been laying there since 1945 of Ukrainian high (40%) participation in Red Army in the last phase of WWII. You must come up with a fantasy that in the current climate of war, the times of lies and excitement may get a traction that while Russian soldiers were raping German women and executing boys from Volkssturm Ukrainian soldiers in the same Red Army were helping old German women get food and water and cross the road and singing lullabies to German orphans. I am afraid that some silly German may even buy this Ukrainian Haggadah perhaps even out of guilt for being fooled by Putin for so many years
But you know most Ukrainians do not write like this, they like to complain about their realities. This Dr Pangloss view of Ukraine, is AP's hobby of always winning every internet argument, especially when it relates to self-identity. This is why I connect him to Jack D. I doubt there is co-incidence they are in the same culture sphere, living in the same place in America, with the same lifestyle. They are also parents' originating from the same Lvov, and both have group identities linked to unusually vulnerable groups, who experience massacres (Jews, Ukrainians), which could their explain motive for more online ethnic sensitivity than e.g. average Irish American or Italian American in New England. In my opinion, he can really believe it, because it is convenient for his emotions. Before the war, in some areas, AP was more accurate than my view (or anyone else here) about the Russian army. But he was also claiming Russia would bomb Ukrainians less than in Grozny, because of being "fraternal" nationalities. There is some romantic view, which doesn't survive first contact with a history book.
Taiwan’s leadership know that their country would be invaded for declaring independence from mainland China. At present China need do nothing because the economic situation is evolving to their advantage and Taiwan is a part of that. Japan and South Korea are also a part of China’s commercial rise, and the US is under economic attack by these same countries,. Japan, South Korea and Taiwan get privileged access to the US market in return for being military allies, which amounts to letting America defend them for free. The whole US strategy in relation to China is playing into their hands so why would they do anything to make America realise it is having its blood sucked?
Your comment is why the "leaked Russian intel" about a military reunification this year is misguided on the part of Chinese military planners (which they now should clearly realize) at best and a cleaving forgery at worst. I'm not a fan of using wars to obtain what can be bought with influence or eventually gained without war.
Japan can and will turn against China, given long-time rivalry that resulted in the Sino-Japanese wars.
I have been talking about the unlikely but possibly decided on early (we can’t be sure one way or another) possibility of reunification this year, and whatever benefits from the view of some Chinese nationalists (and not objectively) can be reaped.
Your comment is why the “leaked Russian intel” about a military reunification this year is misguided on the part of Chinese military planners (which they now should clearly realize) at best and a cleaving forgery at worst. I’m not a fan of using wars to obtain what can be bought with influence or eventually gained without war.
Japan can and will turn against China, given long-time rivalry that resulted in the Sino-Japanese wars.
This is typical sort of Ukrainophobic nonsense that you can spot most anywhere, mostly from Russophiles even at this website. Nothing particularly Polish about it?…Later on, he spills his guts about the “Ukrainian butchers” in Volyn, which yes, for the thousandth time, we can all admit was over the top, however, the work of a limited number of fanatics. How many times can you say “I’m sorry” before it begins to sound hollow and meaningless? Thankfully, it sounds as if most Poles have gotten over this unsavory page of our shared history and are trying to write a new page. Please write more about your current experiences within Poland. The current theme that I’m hearing is that many refugees are starting to go back to their homes in Ukraine?
"Consumers" is perhaps the most offensive of all to my sensibilities since it sounds like a PC way to say worthless leach ,while retarded is the least offensive since it is just an unvarnished technical term to describe a relative mental capacity.
Naturally enough, any of the terms can be utilized as a slur by those with the desire to do so. Changing the term did nothing to modify reality or the unfortunate fact that some people will always enjoy insulting those less capable than themselves.
As you argue, it's the same with the term white. You can come up with any term that you want and it won't change the goals or the desired power dynamic of those in power.Replies: @silviosilver
Based on your posts here, you would undoubtedly qualify as a ‘racist.’ Is it mere cowardice – as Thulean asserts – that prevents you from beginning a sentence, “As a racist, I … “? A terminological change from ‘racist’ to, say, ‘race-realist’ may do nothing to alter the behavior of your opponents, but it can help to get a fair hearing from an audience not unalterably opposed to your views.
How is this not a confession that terminology matters to you?
Also, I completely disagree with your characterization of ‘consumer.’ If a large part of your daily activity involves the consumption of food and other material goods, then you can be fairly classified a consumer. That isn’t the only role you play in society, much less the entirety of your identity, but in certain contexts the classification is perfectly reasonable and eminently useful – imagine an economic analysis that refused the conceptual clarity of ‘producers’ and ‘consumers.’
As I said above, changing the behavior of those opposed to you isn’t the point; it is (one part of) presenting your case in the most attractive fashion to your prospective audience. This matters whether you are selling cars, jewelry, pizza or ideology.
There are also some very silly points you make. Do you really believe that African Jew would serve the Jewish cause the best at a racialist anti-Black blog of Sailer? Have you thought that through?
You seem to totally under appreciate the role of Orthodox and conservative Jews and instead resort to anti-Semitic tropes that all Jews are liberal and will act liberal and support gays and trannies and BLM and this is the only path for Jews. So you want to diminish Jack D effectiveness because his father lived in small town in pre WW II Poland and so Jack D is more like a relic form Sholem Aleichim stories who will have no compelling appeal on a conservative blog. Really, that is what you think? Though I am sure Jack D as a relic does not know as much about what shoes are fashionable as you do so you might be right about his lack of appeal on the sites where you spend remaining 90% of time apart from the unz-dot-com.
Pointing out to the diversity of AP's ideas that he had expressed in the past even if some of them might be somewhat counterproductive (in your opinion) to Ukrainian chauvinism is really naive and simplistic as if you believed that people can be really consistent and could predict all consequences of what they said on various occasions with respect to their overall outlook and objective. AP has a rich personality, wide interests and knowledge but this does not change the fact that he deserves to be labeled as the "professional Ukrainian." If you said that Ukrainians do not eat as many watermelons as Russians I am pretty sure that he would dig up a statistic somewhere to correct your misconception or compensate it with statistic of eating delicious squash where Ukrainian may exceed Russian consumption. Such diligence and earnestness are a hallmark of a "professional Ethnic".
The issue that you haven't addressed which really got me started to zoom in on AP is his shameless proposition which apparently he doubles down as if he really believed it that Ukrainian soldiers in Red Army in WWII and specifically in Germany behaved better than Russian soldiers. And he uses a peculiar illogic that because it was not demonstrated otherwise it must be true. Though he conveniently forgets that by his illogic it is possible that Ukrainians behaved worse than Russians. German_reader and I dismissed his nonsense believing that the military culture of Red Army was the most dominant and equalizing factor.
Yervadian, suggested that this kind of superiority over Russians is a delusion that he cherishes or in other words of Luke from NT: "for of the abundance of his heart his mouth speaketh." But I have problem believing it that intelligent, educated and not that young person would be still in the grip of "idealized parental imago" that compensates the loss of narcissistic perfection of a child. Parental because idealization formation with respect to one's ethnic group is of similar nature and usually affect less intelligent, less educated and more primitive people.
The mechanism of AC screw up does not come form his delusion (he is smart and too savvy for it) but from the need for propagandistic manipulation for this very time: here and now during the war.
We hear of Russian atrocities in Ukraine and some excitable people as well as calculating propagandists want to vilify the whole nation of Russians by connecting it to Red Army behavior during WWII and in Germany in particular. As we know Germany was not very supportive of Ukrainian independence and even colluded with Putin even though Germany is Ukrainians' first and the only love mostly unrequited through their history with exception of brief periods of cock teasing.
Vilification of Russia in eyes of Germany is necessary but one must circumvent the mine that has been laying there since 1945 of Ukrainian high (40%) participation in Red Army in the last phase of WWII. You must come up with a fantasy that in the current climate of war, the times of lies and excitement may get a traction that while Russian soldiers were raping German women and executing boys from Volkssturm Ukrainian soldiers in the same Red Army were helping old German women get food and water and cross the road and singing lullabies to German orphans. I am afraid that some silly German may even buy this Ukrainian Haggadah perhaps even out of guilt for being fooled by Putin for so many yearsReplies: @Dmitry
I enjoy writing new observations for each comment, instead of being constricted to write something relevant to the previous comment. I’m not arguing specifically with your comment, as it is a starting point for writing something interesting (although probably interesting for me, not for others).
I have a very self-indulgent commenting method, which could be annoying for some, but afterall, we are here for our own amusement.
You like reactive commenting, by trying to poke people on their sensitivity, and you enjoy reading their response. I will confess, I prefer the writing part, than the reading part.
I just have strong interest in Israel and for this reason found Sailer’s forum via internet search, and obviously I found the wrong forum for discussing Israel (although you can see I’m still here, so enjoying the forum for other reasons).
Attempt to discuss Israel was often beginning with strange assumptions, that is it either nationalist paradise that Sailer dreams to retire in, or completely third world place collapsing next week. Also I was discussing with people who confuse different border walls and do not visit the region, so it is stupid idea to try.
I ended wasting my forum writing hour, posting encyclopedia information about Israel’s GDP, or explaining why people might be motivated to go there for economic immigration . “Play stupid games win stupid prizes”.
For what it’s worth, in the last couple years, I didn’t lose interest in Israel. My own view overall to Israel became more interested, because of the way they are able to transfer power from rulers, criticize their politicians.
Complaining people, that project self-interest and think their dog is racist against African Americans, are not going to be an effective propaganda, probably in any blog, even Sailer’s.
I think he is an honest commentator, in the sense he writes genuinely based in his emotions of the moment. And he doesn’t necessarily have so much “self-awareness” on topics which can involve his group identities.
He applies the same American racial views to Israel, where says Ethiopian Jews are fake Jews. https://www.unz.com/isteve/nyt-racist-poland-is-letting-in-white-ukrainians-but-not-africans-via-belarus/#comment-5237417
Sure, I remember I had some years ago, copy pasted one of his comments into the meme generator for this tradition. https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-46/#comment-2379356
But you know most Ukrainians do not write like this, they like to complain about their realities. This Dr Pangloss view of Ukraine, is AP’s hobby of always winning every internet argument, especially when it relates to self-identity.
This is why I connect him to Jack D. I doubt there is co-incidence they are in the same culture sphere, living in the same place in America, with the same lifestyle.
They are also parents’ originating from the same Lvov, and both have group identities linked to unusually vulnerable groups, who experience massacres (Jews, Ukrainians), which could their explain motive for more online ethnic sensitivity than e.g. average Irish American or Italian American in New England.
In my opinion, he can really believe it, because it is convenient for his emotions.
Before the war, in some areas, AP was more accurate than my view (or anyone else here) about the Russian army. But he was also claiming Russia would bomb Ukrainians less than in Grozny, because of being “fraternal” nationalities. There is some romantic view, which doesn’t survive first contact with a history book.
It even looked like things could be starting in this direction in Belarus before the 2020 election but the opposition movement was squashed, now following the Ukrainian war there seems low probability of it.
I think the British response was marked by its mixed nature, partly they conceded power, partly they expanded it in other directions (this period must be exceptional with how dynamic and expansive British power was becoming), they were both liberal but at the same time could seem like they were channelling a more reasonable and less enraged de Maistre.
I've been surprised by how resourceful the Belarusian regime was (though not in the direction of creating modern Europeans, in preserving itself), following the huge protests and the ferment, I was thinking it would be their 25th April like the Portuguese Revolution in 1974, somehow it seems there is a gap between the more liberal part of the population, the state and another more Sovok part outside the capital.Replies: @Dmitry
Although the vast majority of people in Spain were Republicans in the 1930s. Franco conquered the majority, and it was a kind of unpredicted direction. I read in the transition years, 1975-1982, there is some consensus a sense of correcting a historical wrong turn.
With the postsoviet space, there is only the Baltics which really have an impressive democracy. It has some feel of a stochastic modeling of counter-factuals, where you shake the dice, and have the same result in most of the postsoviet states.
Sure, they preserve their independence from one side (let’s say Warsaw), but not necessarily so well from the other – Moscow. Their position became weaker as they do not any have leverage between the two sides anymore. There is a kind of accepting the second worse scenario, to allow the government to survive with some smaller independence.
I don't know if there was widespread belief in the late 70s that the 1936 Popular Front government had been the path to progress for Spain, would depend on the historian writing it and whose views it was reflecting. Do you think the Ukraine conflict changes this? It somehow is starting to feel different to what I might have guessed for Russia/Ukraine/Belarus. Luka so far has preserved his position as president though, and his state still exists, with the people trained and making their careers in his system, whereas these things looked to be more at risk around the time of the election.Replies: @Dmitry
“readying themselves in Donbass for an offensive that can only succeed through total commitment to plough on despite extremely heavy casualties against a well prepared defence”
It is looking rather like Hitler’s preparations for Citadel in May and June 1943 but in reverse.
And in the same part of the world. So there’s that.
Maybe the Japs plan to invade Vladivostok?Replies: @Sean
And in the same part of the world. So there's that.Replies: @Wokechoke, @Wokechoke
The entire theatre of war is basically the same as first second and third Kharkov battles. It’s on the same ground.
And in the same part of the world. So there's that.Replies: @Wokechoke, @Wokechoke
I’m going to pour a little cold water on that comparison with Citadel.
The Germans had to divert away a Panzer Corps to Italy when the allies invaded Sicily. Had the landings in Italy not taken place the Germans probably would have pinched off the Kursk Salient. Might not have won the war had they followed through with their reserve units intended for citadel but the Two Front War isn’t a factor here. At least, not yet. There’s no landings in Sicily. No massed surrender in Tunisia either. No Russian Corps or Army has been annihilated anywhere.
Maybe the Japs plan to invade Vladivostok?
Given such a situation, Putin and the Russian leadership might well agree use of a nuclear weapon on the concentration of Ukrainian troops in Donbass was necessary. While Russia using a battlefield nuclear weapon in Ukraine would not start WW3, because the Ukraine is not a member of Nato, it's hardly a reason to be insouciant; it would be a step toward a nuclear war between the US and Russia, which has lost 20,000 killed and many others seriously wounded through having superior weapons used on it by Ukraine. Do not think that Russia would consider the a big bang death of tens of thousands Ukrainian soldiers concentrated in Donbass a militarily unjustified act given certain circumstances. With the losses they have taken around Kiev, the hundreds of crew going down with the 'Glory' class flagship called Moskova, and the coming massacre of Russian troops in the Donbass offensive, I think use of a battlefield thermonuclear weapon is actually going to happenReplies: @Wokechoke
Maybe the Japs plan to invade Vladivostok?Replies: @Sean
The people that thought the 2008 declaration that Ukraine would join Nato would deter Putin from doing anything kinetic to Ukraine. Then they thought the arming of Ukraine (which started under Trump and massively accelerated under Biden) would deter Putin from invading right up to Kiev. Now these same folk are telling us that Putin would not dare use nuclear weapons, and his subordinates would not let him anyway. That is very uncertain, because it depends on what situation he was in. With everything that Ukraine is being given, and the poor performance of Russian forces and consequent lack of morale, Putin’s army of invasion’s attempted double envelopment is not going to be merely be stopped in its tracks, but driven back beyond its start point and probably into Russia proper.
Given such a situation, Putin and the Russian leadership might well agree use of a nuclear weapon on the concentration of Ukrainian troops in Donbass was necessary. While Russia using a battlefield nuclear weapon in Ukraine would not start WW3, because the Ukraine is not a member of Nato, it’s hardly a reason to be insouciant; it would be a step toward a nuclear war between the US and Russia, which has lost 20,000 killed and many others seriously wounded through having superior weapons used on it by Ukraine. Do not think that Russia would consider the a big bang death of tens of thousands Ukrainian soldiers concentrated in Donbass a militarily unjustified act given certain circumstances. With the losses they have taken around Kiev, the hundreds of crew going down with the ‘Glory’ class flagship called Moskova, and the coming massacre of Russian troops in the Donbass offensive, I think use of a battlefield thermonuclear weapon is actually going to happen
I do legitimately think the Russians were prepositioning themselves for dry weather later in the year. They got the end of the freeze, the ground is now churned up mud so the Ukrainians can’t do too much proactive counter attacking. As the ground dries up the Russians have a good line stretching from the Dneiper to Donetsk. A firm anchor around Kharkov down to Izyum and it’s shallow fords which they control across to Lysychansk (sp) and back down to Donetsk.
I don’t think the Ukies can dislodge them from Kherson without a lot of bloodshed. The Russian line from Kharkov to the Dneiper looks pretty good from an offensive POV. It’s a long line the Ukies will have to defend back to back as the salient is bombed, shelled and attacked from three sides.
Unless the Finns besiege St Petersburg again and the Japs storm Vladivostok I don’t think the Ukrainian generals could be happy looking at that situation.Replies: @Sean
In #828 to Dmitri I have tried to elucidate what was behind the most recent production of the “professional Ukrainian.”
Btw, have you read Jerzy Lukowsky? I'd recommended his works to AP several months ago, as a realistic antidote to the excessive romanticisation of the PL Commonwealth. His writing is basically free of any rhetoric though with excellent incidental dark humour. He also mentioned in his introduction to 'Liberty's Folly' that many of more unflattering material he was discussing was totally unknown to English or non Eastern-European readers, which reminded of recent discussion of Ukrainian selective historical memory.Replies: @utu
A large majority voted to create a Republic in 1931, but we would be interested in how close the political culture of Spain was to the modern liberal European type. The record of the years before and during the 2nd Republic, up to the Civil War in 1936 suggests it was pretty different.
IIRC before the Civil War started there wasn’t a huge difference in votes for the left and right, the right managed to win the ’33 elections and governed in 1934-36. During the Civil War itself neither side had that many volunteers compared to populations, most of the armies were conscripts.
I don’t know if there was widespread belief in the late 70s that the 1936 Popular Front government had been the path to progress for Spain, would depend on the historian writing it and whose views it was reflecting.
Do you think the Ukraine conflict changes this? It somehow is starting to feel different to what I might have guessed for Russia/Ukraine/Belarus.
Luka so far has preserved his position as president though, and his state still exists, with the people trained and making their careers in his system, whereas these things looked to be more at risk around the time of the election.
Given such a situation, Putin and the Russian leadership might well agree use of a nuclear weapon on the concentration of Ukrainian troops in Donbass was necessary. While Russia using a battlefield nuclear weapon in Ukraine would not start WW3, because the Ukraine is not a member of Nato, it's hardly a reason to be insouciant; it would be a step toward a nuclear war between the US and Russia, which has lost 20,000 killed and many others seriously wounded through having superior weapons used on it by Ukraine. Do not think that Russia would consider the a big bang death of tens of thousands Ukrainian soldiers concentrated in Donbass a militarily unjustified act given certain circumstances. With the losses they have taken around Kiev, the hundreds of crew going down with the 'Glory' class flagship called Moskova, and the coming massacre of Russian troops in the Donbass offensive, I think use of a battlefield thermonuclear weapon is actually going to happenReplies: @Wokechoke
One odd thing about the timing of the attack into Ukraine. The ground was neither exactly frozen nor dried in summer.
I do legitimately think the Russians were prepositioning themselves for dry weather later in the year. They got the end of the freeze, the ground is now churned up mud so the Ukrainians can’t do too much proactive counter attacking. As the ground dries up the Russians have a good line stretching from the Dneiper to Donetsk. A firm anchor around Kharkov down to Izyum and it’s shallow fords which they control across to Lysychansk (sp) and back down to Donetsk.
I don’t think the Ukies can dislodge them from Kherson without a lot of bloodshed. The Russian line from Kharkov to the Dneiper looks pretty good from an offensive POV. It’s a long line the Ukies will have to defend back to back as the salient is bombed, shelled and attacked from three sides.
Unless the Finns besiege St Petersburg again and the Japs storm Vladivostok I don’t think the Ukrainian generals could be happy looking at that situation.
I’ll give my reponse on your full post later today, on the following open thread. Though that one’s been mostly a mental wasteland (it seems all Sailer’s people are migrating there), but this one is getting full.
Btw, have you read Jerzy Lukowsky? I’d recommended his works to AP several months ago, as a realistic antidote to the excessive romanticisation of the PL Commonwealth. His writing is basically free of any rhetoric though with excellent incidental dark humour. He also mentioned in his introduction to ‘Liberty’s Folly’ that many of more unflattering material he was discussing was totally unknown to English or non Eastern-European readers, which reminded of recent discussion of Ukrainian selective historical memory.
Anyway, it is really hard to romanticize the PLC. Except that in the PLC a super rich noble could tell Polish King to GFY with impunity just like Jack Dorsey to President Trump which obviously a Russian boyar could not do with the respect of Tsar.
What struck me was that the conservative opponents (a dominant faction of nobles and gentry) of reforms were using exactly the same arguments you can hear from conservative and libertarian Republicans in the US in the late 20th century. This possibly may explain why Poles feel so much affinity with America and its liberties and the dysfunctions resulting from them as if PLC was America before America.
A second interesting observation was that the anti-reform faction was supported by Russia. Russia wanted to preserve conservative and dysfunctional Poland. At the same time Diderot and Voltaire who were receiving money from Katherine the Great were behind creation of the 'black legend' of Poland how dysfunctional it was and that it could not govern itself has spread throughout Europe. Thus Poland needed more 'enlightened' and more 'progressive' rulers like Tsar of Russia or King of Prussia to intervene in the internal affairs of Poland which as we know served as legitimation of partitions of Poland that eventually ceased Poland's existence as a sovereign state.
So, when I see the rightoids of the West supporting Russia now and Russia (my and not only mine hypothesis) helping spreading of some ideas, patterns of thinking and memes among the rightoids that are harmful to functioning of modern democracy where the paranoid distrust of government and institutions and pathological selfishness are one of the most detrimental. I think that not much has changed over centuries as the methods remain very similar.
(Does AP really romanticize PLC just as he really believes that Ukrainians did less raping in Berlin 1945 than Russians? This is a part of his activism to create counterpoint to Russian narrative about the genesis and heritage of Ukrainian 'nation'. In the PLC Ukrainian masses had it as bad as in Russia if not worse and Ukraine nobles quickly Polonized themselves and became Polish oligarchs having the largest latifundia (with mostly Ukrainian peasants) in the world and then buying property in Poland where they spread their ruthless eastern methods on Polish peasants. So, from the point of view of 20th century Polish nationalists the fling Poland had with 'Ukraine' was detrimental to everybody in Poland except the oligarchs who were not really ethnic Poles. Interestingly Polish nationalist like Dmowski are pro Russian in that sense that they want to cut Poland to ethnic Poles and leave Ukrainians and Belorussians together with Russia and at the same time they perceive Germany as a greater threat while trying to emulate Germany as much as possible politically and culturally. I can see that Ukrainian nationalist have similar thing of trying to emulate Poland while really hating it and transferring their love to Germany just like Poles transfer it to Hungarians because they are not their neighbors and the law of narcissism of small differences does not kick in.)Replies: @Yevardian
Btw, have you read Jerzy Lukowsky? I'd recommended his works to AP several months ago, as a realistic antidote to the excessive romanticisation of the PL Commonwealth. His writing is basically free of any rhetoric though with excellent incidental dark humour. He also mentioned in his introduction to 'Liberty's Folly' that many of more unflattering material he was discussing was totally unknown to English or non Eastern-European readers, which reminded of recent discussion of Ukrainian selective historical memory.Replies: @utu
“romanticisation of the PL Commonwealth” – I did not read Lukovsky. I read Adam Zamoyski and Norman Davis but more importantly I helped to edit a dissertation on the 18th century attempts of political reforms in the PLC that a daughter of my friend from NY was writing in English at a Polish university. It was about 12 years ago. She used many sources and had many citations that were very interesting.
Anyway, it is really hard to romanticize the PLC. Except that in the PLC a super rich noble could tell Polish King to GFY with impunity just like Jack Dorsey to President Trump which obviously a Russian boyar could not do with the respect of Tsar.
What struck me was that the conservative opponents (a dominant faction of nobles and gentry) of reforms were using exactly the same arguments you can hear from conservative and libertarian Republicans in the US in the late 20th century. This possibly may explain why Poles feel so much affinity with America and its liberties and the dysfunctions resulting from them as if PLC was America before America.
A second interesting observation was that the anti-reform faction was supported by Russia. Russia wanted to preserve conservative and dysfunctional Poland. At the same time Diderot and Voltaire who were receiving money from Katherine the Great were behind creation of the ‘black legend’ of Poland how dysfunctional it was and that it could not govern itself has spread throughout Europe. Thus Poland needed more ‘enlightened’ and more ‘progressive’ rulers like Tsar of Russia or King of Prussia to intervene in the internal affairs of Poland which as we know served as legitimation of partitions of Poland that eventually ceased Poland’s existence as a sovereign state.
So, when I see the rightoids of the West supporting Russia now and Russia (my and not only mine hypothesis) helping spreading of some ideas, patterns of thinking and memes among the rightoids that are harmful to functioning of modern democracy where the paranoid distrust of government and institutions and pathological selfishness are one of the most detrimental. I think that not much has changed over centuries as the methods remain very similar.
(Does AP really romanticize PLC just as he really believes that Ukrainians did less raping in Berlin 1945 than Russians? This is a part of his activism to create counterpoint to Russian narrative about the genesis and heritage of Ukrainian ‘nation’. In the PLC Ukrainian masses had it as bad as in Russia if not worse and Ukraine nobles quickly Polonized themselves and became Polish oligarchs having the largest latifundia (with mostly Ukrainian peasants) in the world and then buying property in Poland where they spread their ruthless eastern methods on Polish peasants. So, from the point of view of 20th century Polish nationalists the fling Poland had with ‘Ukraine’ was detrimental to everybody in Poland except the oligarchs who were not really ethnic Poles. Interestingly Polish nationalist like Dmowski are pro Russian in that sense that they want to cut Poland to ethnic Poles and leave Ukrainians and Belorussians together with Russia and at the same time they perceive Germany as a greater threat while trying to emulate Germany as much as possible politically and culturally. I can see that Ukrainian nationalist have similar thing of trying to emulate Poland while really hating it and transferring their love to Germany just like Poles transfer it to Hungarians because they are not their neighbors and the law of narcissism of small differences does not kick in.)
Anyway, Adam Zamoyski. Funny you mention him in context of romanticisation of the PLC, as his work was the first monograph I read on Poland, I found it enjoyable, but nonetheless undistinguished and uncritical. Of course it was no surprise to find out later Zamoyski was descended from one of the largest and most 'progressive' oligarchichal families of all of Poland, which certainly explained a lot.
His position sort of reminds me of someone like Robin Lane-Fox, a rather mediocre classicist but competent (enough) writer, who I'm certain must also owe his comfy humanities position to powerful family connections. Actually, on that tangent, you might enjoy absolutely devastating review of Fox's work from a truly titanic talent of the field, Ernst Badian (if my word isn't good enough, just know that Our Benevolent Overlord seems to have studied under him).
https://www.nybooks.com/articles/1974/09/19/the-alexander-romance/ Heh, I was thinking to say, what I found so fascinating first reading genuine scholarship on Poland, from Lukowski, was encountering the identical libertardian arguments of contemporary USA. Then even encountering, in a slightly modified form, the same mental pathology as Americans (now spreading to Europe) in the old PLC, with virtual beggars continuing to take pride in their 'schlachta lineage', 'Golden Liberty' and so on, serving as useful idiots for taking all their heat as their proxy 'liberum veto', or the justifying ideology in deluding all but the most impoverished that they are 'middle class'. If you wanted to stretch analogies, without doing major violence to historical facts, you could even compare the position of Ukrainian labour to that of Mexicans in the US.
In the case of Zamoyski family themselves, as the owners of some of the largest latifundia in country (and likely all Europe, if Russia isn't counted) its also strangely immediate to see them adopting short-term risks in 'progressive' agriculture, which the vast majority of Polish landowners simply couldn't afford, if only due to the toxic culture of conscipuous consumption, without which their peers would never take them seriously (more parallels). I don't know about Prussia, but I recall towards the end of the Commonwealth's life, the Russians under Catherine (iirc) even started pushing the Poles towards more administrative efficiency (ending the veto, etc), if only because the remnant of the PLC was regarded as being firmly secure as Russian vassal-state by this time. Partially, but I actually don't think Russia has that much influence in this regard, certainly not in comparison to the USSR's old influence amongst leftoids. And of course propaganda only works on an already demoralised population, willing or even eager to suspend disbelief to retain hope for a superior alternative. Neither do I see many influential or successful people acting as Russian partisans, just a few private eccentrics like Mr. Unz or figures resigned to outsider-status like Orban. Certainly I don't think Russia had anything to do with Trump's election win, though of course that was their preferred outcome. But Russia has always preferred dealing with Republicans anyway, if its anything Russian politicians can't stand its true-believer ideologues, most of whom are still in the Democrat party.
Also, I think both the invasion of Ukraine itself, and Russia's far-below-expectations in conducting it, have done a serious blow to any Russian influence, or even merely understanding and respect, outside of the Third World (see Karlin's deranged half-joking posts about an anti-whitoid crusade, etc). Well, I don't know. But the key point to me, is he wasn't born and has never lived in Ukraine. Sincere or not, there are plenty of intelligent, or perhaps more neutrally, successful in life, Jewish Israel-firsters, obviously too many to name.
Of course, especially at this time, it must be very painful for Ukranians to admit that (by far) the closest nation/ethnicity to themselves are Russians, and always have been. This isn't even necessarily the same as arguing Ukraine is a 'fake nation', but of course, intellectual dishonesty like 'Ukrainians raped less than Russians in WWI, Ukrainians drink less, Ukrainians have democratic roots (etc)... this sophistry is instantly seen-through by Russians regardless of personal sympathies.
But that sort of thing is universal enough, and forgivable to a point. The point it doesn't become forgivable is whether being 'elastic' with the truth for a 'greater good' extends far enough for something like Bucha or now the latest Tochka missile atrocity to be false flags. Given that Ukraine became independent in the context of their local Communist Party (including Security Apparatus) abandoning a sinking ship to join forces with the same nationalists they persecuted for decades, I don't consider it all unlikely.
And one thing Mr. Unz remains absolutely correct about is the overwhelming motive for such 'operations', given total American Media Dominance, even penetrating to closed societies like China, or closing ones like Russia.Replies: @Dmitry, @AP
I don't know if there was widespread belief in the late 70s that the 1936 Popular Front government had been the path to progress for Spain, would depend on the historian writing it and whose views it was reflecting. Do you think the Ukraine conflict changes this? It somehow is starting to feel different to what I might have guessed for Russia/Ukraine/Belarus. Luka so far has preserved his position as president though, and his state still exists, with the people trained and making their careers in his system, whereas these things looked to be more at risk around the time of the election.Replies: @Dmitry
Just 2,5 years ago, Lukashenko was speaking like he could become a multi-vectoring, independent power, with a little leverage against Moscow. He feels he was important for China, as a land corridor to Europe. Geely (probably the most advanced “Western style organized” Chinese automobile company, according to what people have said to me) has installed a factory there.
He had a growing IT outsourcing industry. He was not exactly in the position of Aliev, who has oil, access to sea, diverse friends and a well organized military (Belarus apparently has the most disorganized military in the region). But he has no doubt, some illusions. I remember listening on Echo of Moscow, to his interview with Venediktov, in 2019. He was still very confidence against Russian pressure, saying aggressively comments like “Belarus is avoiding the corruption of Russian culture”.
It’s scary how fast the illusions crash. I feel it is too early to say about this topic. But doesn’t their future, seem like the “world’s largest Pridnestrovye”? Maybe, “South Ossetia” with an EU border?
Today, they lose the access for non petroleum or medicine carrying trucking to the EU (https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-04-18/russian-and-belarusian-trucks-stuck-at-polish-border/100996526).
So, what is the need for China’s investment in Belarus anymore, if there is no trade carrying to EU from there? That’s why China was interested in them, which Lukashenko has been so proud of.
I was just recently reading about in the time Orwell arrives in Barcelona in the first year of war, in 1936, anarchists are controlling this city. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homage_to_Catalonia#Chapter_one
For some short time during the war, it sounds like it was almost the “Paris Commune”.


Houellebecq was writing about books he read when he was young on Unherd today:
https://unherd.com/2022/04/the-books-that-made-me/Replies: @Yevardian
Anyway, it is really hard to romanticize the PLC. Except that in the PLC a super rich noble could tell Polish King to GFY with impunity just like Jack Dorsey to President Trump which obviously a Russian boyar could not do with the respect of Tsar.
What struck me was that the conservative opponents (a dominant faction of nobles and gentry) of reforms were using exactly the same arguments you can hear from conservative and libertarian Republicans in the US in the late 20th century. This possibly may explain why Poles feel so much affinity with America and its liberties and the dysfunctions resulting from them as if PLC was America before America.
A second interesting observation was that the anti-reform faction was supported by Russia. Russia wanted to preserve conservative and dysfunctional Poland. At the same time Diderot and Voltaire who were receiving money from Katherine the Great were behind creation of the 'black legend' of Poland how dysfunctional it was and that it could not govern itself has spread throughout Europe. Thus Poland needed more 'enlightened' and more 'progressive' rulers like Tsar of Russia or King of Prussia to intervene in the internal affairs of Poland which as we know served as legitimation of partitions of Poland that eventually ceased Poland's existence as a sovereign state.
So, when I see the rightoids of the West supporting Russia now and Russia (my and not only mine hypothesis) helping spreading of some ideas, patterns of thinking and memes among the rightoids that are harmful to functioning of modern democracy where the paranoid distrust of government and institutions and pathological selfishness are one of the most detrimental. I think that not much has changed over centuries as the methods remain very similar.
(Does AP really romanticize PLC just as he really believes that Ukrainians did less raping in Berlin 1945 than Russians? This is a part of his activism to create counterpoint to Russian narrative about the genesis and heritage of Ukrainian 'nation'. In the PLC Ukrainian masses had it as bad as in Russia if not worse and Ukraine nobles quickly Polonized themselves and became Polish oligarchs having the largest latifundia (with mostly Ukrainian peasants) in the world and then buying property in Poland where they spread their ruthless eastern methods on Polish peasants. So, from the point of view of 20th century Polish nationalists the fling Poland had with 'Ukraine' was detrimental to everybody in Poland except the oligarchs who were not really ethnic Poles. Interestingly Polish nationalist like Dmowski are pro Russian in that sense that they want to cut Poland to ethnic Poles and leave Ukrainians and Belorussians together with Russia and at the same time they perceive Germany as a greater threat while trying to emulate Germany as much as possible politically and culturally. I can see that Ukrainian nationalist have similar thing of trying to emulate Poland while really hating it and transferring their love to Germany just like Poles transfer it to Hungarians because they are not their neighbors and the law of narcissism of small differences does not kick in.)Replies: @Yevardian
I had a small double take thinking it was the same numismatist specialising in Hellenistic coinage, which would have been quite an impressive double specialisation, but on a search I see its Davies.
Anyway, Adam Zamoyski. Funny you mention him in context of romanticisation of the PLC, as his work was the first monograph I read on Poland, I found it enjoyable, but nonetheless undistinguished and uncritical. Of course it was no surprise to find out later Zamoyski was descended from one of the largest and most ‘progressive’ oligarchichal families of all of Poland, which certainly explained a lot.
His position sort of reminds me of someone like Robin Lane-Fox, a rather mediocre classicist but competent (enough) writer, who I’m certain must also owe his comfy humanities position to powerful family connections. Actually, on that tangent, you might enjoy absolutely devastating review of Fox’s work from a truly titanic talent of the field, Ernst Badian (if my word isn’t good enough, just know that Our Benevolent Overlord seems to have studied under him).
https://www.nybooks.com/articles/1974/09/19/the-alexander-romance/
Heh, I was thinking to say, what I found so fascinating first reading genuine scholarship on Poland, from Lukowski, was encountering the identical libertardian arguments of contemporary USA. Then even encountering, in a slightly modified form, the same mental pathology as Americans (now spreading to Europe) in the old PLC, with virtual beggars continuing to take pride in their ‘schlachta lineage’, ‘Golden Liberty’ and so on, serving as useful idiots for taking all their heat as their proxy ‘liberum veto’, or the justifying ideology in deluding all but the most impoverished that they are ‘middle class’. If you wanted to stretch analogies, without doing major violence to historical facts, you could even compare the position of Ukrainian labour to that of Mexicans in the US.
In the case of Zamoyski family themselves, as the owners of some of the largest latifundia in country (and likely all Europe, if Russia isn’t counted) its also strangely immediate to see them adopting short-term risks in ‘progressive’ agriculture, which the vast majority of Polish landowners simply couldn’t afford, if only due to the toxic culture of conscipuous consumption, without which their peers would never take them seriously (more parallels).
I don’t know about Prussia, but I recall towards the end of the Commonwealth’s life, the Russians under Catherine (iirc) even started pushing the Poles towards more administrative efficiency (ending the veto, etc), if only because the remnant of the PLC was regarded as being firmly secure as Russian vassal-state by this time.
Partially, but I actually don’t think Russia has that much influence in this regard, certainly not in comparison to the USSR’s old influence amongst leftoids. And of course propaganda only works on an already demoralised population, willing or even eager to suspend disbelief to retain hope for a superior alternative. Neither do I see many influential or successful people acting as Russian partisans, just a few private eccentrics like Mr. Unz or figures resigned to outsider-status like Orban. Certainly I don’t think Russia had anything to do with Trump’s election win, though of course that was their preferred outcome. But Russia has always preferred dealing with Republicans anyway, if its anything Russian politicians can’t stand its true-believer ideologues, most of whom are still in the Democrat party.
Also, I think both the invasion of Ukraine itself, and Russia’s far-below-expectations in conducting it, have done a serious blow to any Russian influence, or even merely understanding and respect, outside of the Third World (see Karlin’s deranged half-joking posts about an anti-whitoid crusade, etc).
Well, I don’t know. But the key point to me, is he wasn’t born and has never lived in Ukraine. Sincere or not, there are plenty of intelligent, or perhaps more neutrally, successful in life, Jewish Israel-firsters, obviously too many to name.
Of course, especially at this time, it must be very painful for Ukranians to admit that (by far) the closest nation/ethnicity to themselves are Russians, and always have been. This isn’t even necessarily the same as arguing Ukraine is a ‘fake nation’, but of course, intellectual dishonesty like ‘Ukrainians raped less than Russians in WWI, Ukrainians drink less, Ukrainians have democratic roots (etc)… this sophistry is instantly seen-through by Russians regardless of personal sympathies.
But that sort of thing is universal enough, and forgivable to a point. The point it doesn’t become forgivable is whether being ‘elastic’ with the truth for a ‘greater good’ extends far enough for something like Bucha or now the latest Tochka missile atrocity to be false flags. Given that Ukraine became independent in the context of their local Communist Party (including Security Apparatus) abandoning a sinking ship to join forces with the same nationalists they persecuted for decades, I don’t consider it all unlikely.
And one thing Mr. Unz remains absolutely correct about is the overwhelming motive for such ‘operations’, given total American Media Dominance, even penetrating to closed societies like China, or closing ones like Russia.
Although to be fair with AP and Jack D, every time I debated with them about the region, they usually win the argument and are correct, while I was incorrect. I remember AP's argument about villages in Ukraine being more attractive than in Russia. I remember I was then looking at Google maps of Ukraine for a long time and AP was correct. There were also arguments about income levels between Ukraine and Russia, where I was sure Ukraine would be far lower. I go to search the job websites and somehow AP was correct for the service jobs, and the minimum salaries were ever higher. And of course, his statements in February about military level difference between Russia and Ukraine, were the only accurate ones in the forum, while I was a gullible victim of propaganda.
As for Jack D. I'm enjoying reading his posts about Lvov.
https://www.unz.com/isteve/whats-wrong-with-this-picture/#comment-1613234
But you should pay attention to Dmitri when he writes that I am usually right about Ukraine and Ukrainians (yes Ukrainian villages are cleaner and nicer than Russian ones, and yes Ukrainians are historically less violent than Russians), and this is a simple verifiable:
In 1996 Russians consumed about 4 times more alcohol per capita than Ukrainians. This is a historical fact. I have known elderly people who had moved from Ukraine to Russia in the 1940s and the massive level of drinking compared to Ukraine that they encountered in Russia was one of their strongest impressions. This was also true of impressions of Ukrainians who had moved to Russia in the 1970s and 1980s to work in the gas industry.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_alcohol_consumption_per_capita
To suggest no difference in drinking patterns is to reveal ignorance about Ukrainians and Russians, the kind that leads one to assume no differences in other areas such as village life and appearances, and yes violent behavior. Comment coming from the same ignorance that leads one to believe that Russians and Ukrainians drink in similar quantities.
In language as in culture Ukrainians are about as close to Poles as to Russians although there is a continuum: Galicians are closer to Poles but Kharkivites are closer to Russians.
:::::::::::::
I become more impressed with Poles every day I have been here in Poland. Such kind and wonderful people. For example, at a tourist castle I tried to buy a book but they didn’t take credit cards or dollars, so I walked away. A few minutes later a Pole tapped me and gave me the book; he had overheard the exchange. Such events are typical.Replies: @silviosilver
Anyway, Adam Zamoyski. Funny you mention him in context of romanticisation of the PLC, as his work was the first monograph I read on Poland, I found it enjoyable, but nonetheless undistinguished and uncritical. Of course it was no surprise to find out later Zamoyski was descended from one of the largest and most 'progressive' oligarchichal families of all of Poland, which certainly explained a lot.
His position sort of reminds me of someone like Robin Lane-Fox, a rather mediocre classicist but competent (enough) writer, who I'm certain must also owe his comfy humanities position to powerful family connections. Actually, on that tangent, you might enjoy absolutely devastating review of Fox's work from a truly titanic talent of the field, Ernst Badian (if my word isn't good enough, just know that Our Benevolent Overlord seems to have studied under him).
https://www.nybooks.com/articles/1974/09/19/the-alexander-romance/ Heh, I was thinking to say, what I found so fascinating first reading genuine scholarship on Poland, from Lukowski, was encountering the identical libertardian arguments of contemporary USA. Then even encountering, in a slightly modified form, the same mental pathology as Americans (now spreading to Europe) in the old PLC, with virtual beggars continuing to take pride in their 'schlachta lineage', 'Golden Liberty' and so on, serving as useful idiots for taking all their heat as their proxy 'liberum veto', or the justifying ideology in deluding all but the most impoverished that they are 'middle class'. If you wanted to stretch analogies, without doing major violence to historical facts, you could even compare the position of Ukrainian labour to that of Mexicans in the US.
In the case of Zamoyski family themselves, as the owners of some of the largest latifundia in country (and likely all Europe, if Russia isn't counted) its also strangely immediate to see them adopting short-term risks in 'progressive' agriculture, which the vast majority of Polish landowners simply couldn't afford, if only due to the toxic culture of conscipuous consumption, without which their peers would never take them seriously (more parallels). I don't know about Prussia, but I recall towards the end of the Commonwealth's life, the Russians under Catherine (iirc) even started pushing the Poles towards more administrative efficiency (ending the veto, etc), if only because the remnant of the PLC was regarded as being firmly secure as Russian vassal-state by this time. Partially, but I actually don't think Russia has that much influence in this regard, certainly not in comparison to the USSR's old influence amongst leftoids. And of course propaganda only works on an already demoralised population, willing or even eager to suspend disbelief to retain hope for a superior alternative. Neither do I see many influential or successful people acting as Russian partisans, just a few private eccentrics like Mr. Unz or figures resigned to outsider-status like Orban. Certainly I don't think Russia had anything to do with Trump's election win, though of course that was their preferred outcome. But Russia has always preferred dealing with Republicans anyway, if its anything Russian politicians can't stand its true-believer ideologues, most of whom are still in the Democrat party.
Also, I think both the invasion of Ukraine itself, and Russia's far-below-expectations in conducting it, have done a serious blow to any Russian influence, or even merely understanding and respect, outside of the Third World (see Karlin's deranged half-joking posts about an anti-whitoid crusade, etc). Well, I don't know. But the key point to me, is he wasn't born and has never lived in Ukraine. Sincere or not, there are plenty of intelligent, or perhaps more neutrally, successful in life, Jewish Israel-firsters, obviously too many to name.
Of course, especially at this time, it must be very painful for Ukranians to admit that (by far) the closest nation/ethnicity to themselves are Russians, and always have been. This isn't even necessarily the same as arguing Ukraine is a 'fake nation', but of course, intellectual dishonesty like 'Ukrainians raped less than Russians in WWI, Ukrainians drink less, Ukrainians have democratic roots (etc)... this sophistry is instantly seen-through by Russians regardless of personal sympathies.
But that sort of thing is universal enough, and forgivable to a point. The point it doesn't become forgivable is whether being 'elastic' with the truth for a 'greater good' extends far enough for something like Bucha or now the latest Tochka missile atrocity to be false flags. Given that Ukraine became independent in the context of their local Communist Party (including Security Apparatus) abandoning a sinking ship to join forces with the same nationalists they persecuted for decades, I don't consider it all unlikely.
And one thing Mr. Unz remains absolutely correct about is the overwhelming motive for such 'operations', given total American Media Dominance, even penetrating to closed societies like China, or closing ones like Russia.Replies: @Dmitry, @AP
You don’t have to be a professional expert, to know this an intentional Russian civil war and poisoning the well of your own culture. Or it’s better to say postsoviet civil war, as any ruined Soviet people (whether Buryats or Chechens) murder another, without understanding the reason, for the rival politicians whose own children are in Marbella.
This civil war reality, doesn’t mean it is less of a crime in my view. I’m not sure killing your own world, should be less problematic than killing another person’s world. Sometimes we think worse of people who would trash their own room, than another’s room.
Within the context of our forum discussions (for little that our procrastinating debates are relevant), there was AP who disliked Mariupol, insulted the population of Eastern Ukraine because they had a higher rate of HIV, etc. When this is now the region being destroyed, while Western Ukraine will not be so damaged.
–
Although to be fair with AP and Jack D, every time I debated with them about the region, they usually win the argument and are correct, while I was incorrect.
I remember AP’s argument about villages in Ukraine being more attractive than in Russia. I remember I was then looking at Google maps of Ukraine for a long time and AP was correct. There were also arguments about income levels between Ukraine and Russia, where I was sure Ukraine would be far lower. I go to search the job websites and somehow AP was correct for the service jobs, and the minimum salaries were ever higher. And of course, his statements in February about military level difference between Russia and Ukraine, were the only accurate ones in the forum, while I was a gullible victim of propaganda.
As for Jack D. I’m enjoying reading his posts about Lvov.
https://www.unz.com/isteve/whats-wrong-with-this-picture/#comment-1613234
I do legitimately think the Russians were prepositioning themselves for dry weather later in the year. They got the end of the freeze, the ground is now churned up mud so the Ukrainians can’t do too much proactive counter attacking. As the ground dries up the Russians have a good line stretching from the Dneiper to Donetsk. A firm anchor around Kharkov down to Izyum and it’s shallow fords which they control across to Lysychansk (sp) and back down to Donetsk.
I don’t think the Ukies can dislodge them from Kherson without a lot of bloodshed. The Russian line from Kharkov to the Dneiper looks pretty good from an offensive POV. It’s a long line the Ukies will have to defend back to back as the salient is bombed, shelled and attacked from three sides.
Unless the Finns besiege St Petersburg again and the Japs storm Vladivostok I don’t think the Ukrainian generals could be happy looking at that situation.Replies: @Sean
A lot of the vehicles lost went into ditches through bad driving. I think it is clear that Putin and his planners were misled into believing Russia forces could reload the Crimea trick and drive along the roads to their central Kiev objectives without fighting. The prominent tole given to hapless Russian National Guard’ (actually more riot police) units rather than reconnaissance in the headlong rush to the capitol, suggest that the Russian operation was first and foremost designed to cope with civil unrest rather than a well armed and trained army ready, willing and able to fight. America is giving Ukraine heavy artillery, abundant ammunition, and cutting edge counter battery equipment, so even in the supposed strong suite of the Russia army it will be outmatched. Because the US objective is to ensure Ukraine does not lose, Russia cannot win. Unless ….
America is giving them 18 howitzers! Putler is doomed!
What’s happening around Kharkov and Izyum right now could prove decisive. If Russians can’t keep key strategic ground they ought to pack up.Replies: @Dmitry
Ukraine has no Nato charter chapter 5 protection against conventional war. Nor non-conventional war neither. America used a nuclear weapon against a city in mainland Japan, then they used another one on a city. Two cities! In Donbass it would be against military forces. Moreover Russia has 20,000 dead and Ukraine a fraction of that, so Russia needs to settle accounts with Ukraine before ending the war, and that means a lot of killing of Ukrainian soldiers; Putin can't do it conventionally, I think the Donbass offensive is not going to get going and even if it does it is guaranteed to fail. A very big bang with ten thousand dead is going to be the only way out. It fits with the Russian preference for non-economy of force and over the top gigantism in tactics, as written about by Peter Vigor.Replies: @Seraphim, @Wokechoke
Lots of Ukrainians. Poles like them. They didn’t mind the construction workers but the women and kids are endearing. There are now more Ukrainian professionals integrating into society for now (they may return). The effects of the UPA murders on perceptions are being further eclipsed and erased. The local church is building a place for refugees. Happy to hear one Pole spontaneously tell me things like this crisis has brought our peoples together, that one day together we can stand up to rivals in the West or the East. Rebirth of some new form of PLC? Perhaps some good can come from the tragic and stupid Russian invasion.Replies: @Thulean Friend, @Seraphim
Yes, it is very likely that Galicia will become again the “Eastern Little Poland”. But it is unlikely that Kiev will became again the ”Województwo Kijowskie”. It will certainly go to Russia as it was since 1667. Zhytomyr probably would go to Poland. Hopefully Bukovina and Bessarabia would be returned to Romania.
The targeting gear is infinitely more important than the hardware. If the Russians can be driven back at will in certain key areas, by artillery directed by good spotters, they ought to concede. As pointed out the Russian army was expecting to fight rioters rather than fully British trained Airborne and Commando brigades with the right motivation and logistics.
What’s happening around Kharkov and Izyum right now could prove decisive. If Russians can’t keep key strategic ground they ought to pack up.
- A story I saw posted today, of an international (Canadian) soldier, writing about Ukrainian soldiers. "Two Ukrainian soldiers came out of the trench to smoke. I told them to put out their cigarettes and go back to cover while I looked for the position of the Russian tanks. They didn't listen and even ventured close to the edge of the forest, trying to show me the location of Russian tanks. I told them to come back immediately to take shelter and not to expose themselves like this again.""Twenty seconds later, I was fifteen meters from the soldiers. I was watching with my binoculars. A huge explosion shook me. I looked to my left. The two Ukrainian soldiers were lying on the ground.. Infantry procedures and drills are important. Here we see a striking example." old.reddit.com/r/RussiaUkraineWar2022/comments/u6ni5v/canadian_sniper_wali_with_an_updateReplies: @Wokechoke
If they did that they would not be Russians.
Quote from military Sovietologist Peter Vigor, who also noted that the Russians assumed they would lose a long war. My bet would be the Russians are going to (reversal of accepted doctrine) maneuver, or rather threaten to, in order to pin the enemy by the prospect of this massive tank drive with the ostensible objective of a double envelopment of the bulk of the best units of the Ukrainian army in Donbass. I think once they have the Ukrainians all concentrated and set up, Putin is going to use a battlefield thermonuclear weapon.
No, the Ukrainian army are doomed. The Russians are warning the US about all the shipments of advanced arms going to Ukraine. Privately they are saying the stuff if highly effective.
They seem unable to interdict the rail lines and even if they are leaving them for some reason of their own, they surely will not be able to do anything to stop the trucks that will cut off the supply. Hitting a Nato base in a Nato country would virtually be a declaration of war against an alliance with superior equipment that outnumbers Russia 4:1.
Ukraine has no Nato charter chapter 5 protection against conventional war. Nor non-conventional war neither. America used a nuclear weapon against a city in mainland Japan, then they used another one on a city. Two cities! In Donbass it would be against military forces. Moreover Russia has 20,000 dead and Ukraine a fraction of that, so Russia needs to settle accounts with Ukraine before ending the war, and that means a lot of killing of Ukrainian soldiers; Putin can’t do it conventionally, I think the Donbass offensive is not going to get going and even if it does it is guaranteed to fail. A very big bang with ten thousand dead is going to be the only way out. It fits with the Russian preference for non-economy of force and over the top gigantism in tactics, as written about by Peter Vigor.
He noted that in the morning, high-precision air-based missiles of the Russian Aerospace Forces of the Russian Armed Forces attacked the 124th Joint Logistics Support Center of the Logistics Forces of the Ukrainian troops near Lviv. "The logistics center and the large consignments of foreign weapons that were delivered to Ukraine from the United States and European countries over the past six days have been destroyed," Konashenkov stressed.''
On the side: ''The missile forces and artillery of the Russian Federation carried out strikes on 331 military facilities in Ukraine, he added. "Missile troops and artillery hit 331 military facilities. Nine command posts, a warehouse of missile and artillery weapons, as well as 315 enemy manpower concentration areas in the areas of Popasnaya and Novomayorskoye settlements were hit. As a result of the strike, up to 120 nationalists and nine units of military equipment," said an official representative of the Russian Defense Ministry.'' And that's probably just the warmup for what's coming.
''ten thousand dead is going to be the only way out'' for Ukrainians. Or capitulation. The twenty thousand plus irreplaceably losses are on the Ukrainian side.
I remember that I could see this Geely factory being constructed, it is near the railway line which goes through my wife’s home town. I didn’t get a chance to see inside one but from the outside the cars looked okay for the price. Also round about this time Chinese language signs started to appear and Komunarka chocolates with Chinese labels.
The visa rules for foreign visitors were relaxed in early 2018, so that visitors from the EU and other wealthier countries entering by Minsk airport could stay for 30 days without a visa, more Western and Arab tourists started appearing.
This must have been the peak of time of liberalisation and the independent policy, I was even saving up some money to start a small business venture in Minsk (!). For what it is worth (not a huge amount), my predication in early 2018 was that Belarus would continue to slowly get richer, more open to modern business, and might progress to a local version of managed democracy as Luka got older. I thought Russia would stay stable but gradually become wealthier as well and acquire more conventional democratic features as this happened.
I heard someone talking about ‘economism’ the other day as a hegemonic view in the 90s and 2000s, where growing the economy and enhancing living standards was taken as the dominant political issue, I would say now I probably took this thinking for granted.
It looks like that, for example there is an exodus of the higher earning IT people, the companies can’t do business due to the sanctions and are relocating staff as quickly as possible to neighbouring countries (or to Mexico and Vietnam). My wife is depressed about it and talks about ‘New European North Korea’, since the election it has been becoming more overtly a dictatorship again.
But there seems to be some general thing going on, even the UK feels less freer and stable to me than it did in 2018. I am sure commenter Bashibuzuk would have had some interesting ideas to share if he was still around.
Homage to Catalonia was the first book about the Spanish Civil War I read, my dad had a copy from time he was a student. I was looking at this copy and thinking I might reread it, to see what it is like after 25+ years have passed. I have a feeling the politics will seem more strange, given all the changes since the mid 1990s.
Houellebecq was writing about books he read when he was young on Unherd today:
https://unherd.com/2022/04/the-books-that-made-me/
Ukraine has no Nato charter chapter 5 protection against conventional war. Nor non-conventional war neither. America used a nuclear weapon against a city in mainland Japan, then they used another one on a city. Two cities! In Donbass it would be against military forces. Moreover Russia has 20,000 dead and Ukraine a fraction of that, so Russia needs to settle accounts with Ukraine before ending the war, and that means a lot of killing of Ukrainian soldiers; Putin can't do it conventionally, I think the Donbass offensive is not going to get going and even if it does it is guaranteed to fail. A very big bang with ten thousand dead is going to be the only way out. It fits with the Russian preference for non-economy of force and over the top gigantism in tactics, as written about by Peter Vigor.Replies: @Seraphim, @Wokechoke
Russians are ”not able to do anything to stop the trucks” with the NATO wonder weapons. Really?
”MOSCOW, 18 April. /TASS/. The RF Armed Forces destroyed the logistics center and the large consignments of foreign weapons that were in it, which arrived in Ukraine from the United States and European countries over the past 6 days. This was announced on Monday by the official representative of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, Major General Igor Konashenkov.
He noted that in the morning, high-precision air-based missiles of the Russian Aerospace Forces of the Russian Armed Forces attacked the 124th Joint Logistics Support Center of the Logistics Forces of the Ukrainian troops near Lviv. “The logistics center and the large consignments of foreign weapons that were delivered to Ukraine from the United States and European countries over the past six days have been destroyed,” Konashenkov stressed.”
On the side: ”The missile forces and artillery of the Russian Federation carried out strikes on 331 military facilities in Ukraine, he added. “Missile troops and artillery hit 331 military facilities. Nine command posts, a warehouse of missile and artillery weapons, as well as 315 enemy manpower concentration areas in the areas of Popasnaya and Novomayorskoye settlements were hit. As a result of the strike, up to 120 nationalists and nine units of military equipment,” said an official representative of the Russian Defense Ministry.” And that’s probably just the warmup for what’s coming.
”ten thousand dead is going to be the only way out” for Ukrainians. Or capitulation. The twenty thousand plus irreplaceably losses are on the Ukrainian side.
Anyway, Adam Zamoyski. Funny you mention him in context of romanticisation of the PLC, as his work was the first monograph I read on Poland, I found it enjoyable, but nonetheless undistinguished and uncritical. Of course it was no surprise to find out later Zamoyski was descended from one of the largest and most 'progressive' oligarchichal families of all of Poland, which certainly explained a lot.
His position sort of reminds me of someone like Robin Lane-Fox, a rather mediocre classicist but competent (enough) writer, who I'm certain must also owe his comfy humanities position to powerful family connections. Actually, on that tangent, you might enjoy absolutely devastating review of Fox's work from a truly titanic talent of the field, Ernst Badian (if my word isn't good enough, just know that Our Benevolent Overlord seems to have studied under him).
https://www.nybooks.com/articles/1974/09/19/the-alexander-romance/ Heh, I was thinking to say, what I found so fascinating first reading genuine scholarship on Poland, from Lukowski, was encountering the identical libertardian arguments of contemporary USA. Then even encountering, in a slightly modified form, the same mental pathology as Americans (now spreading to Europe) in the old PLC, with virtual beggars continuing to take pride in their 'schlachta lineage', 'Golden Liberty' and so on, serving as useful idiots for taking all their heat as their proxy 'liberum veto', or the justifying ideology in deluding all but the most impoverished that they are 'middle class'. If you wanted to stretch analogies, without doing major violence to historical facts, you could even compare the position of Ukrainian labour to that of Mexicans in the US.
In the case of Zamoyski family themselves, as the owners of some of the largest latifundia in country (and likely all Europe, if Russia isn't counted) its also strangely immediate to see them adopting short-term risks in 'progressive' agriculture, which the vast majority of Polish landowners simply couldn't afford, if only due to the toxic culture of conscipuous consumption, without which their peers would never take them seriously (more parallels). I don't know about Prussia, but I recall towards the end of the Commonwealth's life, the Russians under Catherine (iirc) even started pushing the Poles towards more administrative efficiency (ending the veto, etc), if only because the remnant of the PLC was regarded as being firmly secure as Russian vassal-state by this time. Partially, but I actually don't think Russia has that much influence in this regard, certainly not in comparison to the USSR's old influence amongst leftoids. And of course propaganda only works on an already demoralised population, willing or even eager to suspend disbelief to retain hope for a superior alternative. Neither do I see many influential or successful people acting as Russian partisans, just a few private eccentrics like Mr. Unz or figures resigned to outsider-status like Orban. Certainly I don't think Russia had anything to do with Trump's election win, though of course that was their preferred outcome. But Russia has always preferred dealing with Republicans anyway, if its anything Russian politicians can't stand its true-believer ideologues, most of whom are still in the Democrat party.
Also, I think both the invasion of Ukraine itself, and Russia's far-below-expectations in conducting it, have done a serious blow to any Russian influence, or even merely understanding and respect, outside of the Third World (see Karlin's deranged half-joking posts about an anti-whitoid crusade, etc). Well, I don't know. But the key point to me, is he wasn't born and has never lived in Ukraine. Sincere or not, there are plenty of intelligent, or perhaps more neutrally, successful in life, Jewish Israel-firsters, obviously too many to name.
Of course, especially at this time, it must be very painful for Ukranians to admit that (by far) the closest nation/ethnicity to themselves are Russians, and always have been. This isn't even necessarily the same as arguing Ukraine is a 'fake nation', but of course, intellectual dishonesty like 'Ukrainians raped less than Russians in WWI, Ukrainians drink less, Ukrainians have democratic roots (etc)... this sophistry is instantly seen-through by Russians regardless of personal sympathies.
But that sort of thing is universal enough, and forgivable to a point. The point it doesn't become forgivable is whether being 'elastic' with the truth for a 'greater good' extends far enough for something like Bucha or now the latest Tochka missile atrocity to be false flags. Given that Ukraine became independent in the context of their local Communist Party (including Security Apparatus) abandoning a sinking ship to join forces with the same nationalists they persecuted for decades, I don't consider it all unlikely.
And one thing Mr. Unz remains absolutely correct about is the overwhelming motive for such 'operations', given total American Media Dominance, even penetrating to closed societies like China, or closing ones like Russia.Replies: @Dmitry, @AP
I wish I could respond in more detail to yours and utu’s posts now, but am too busy; I have only had time to quickly read them.
But you should pay attention to Dmitri when he writes that I am usually right about Ukraine and Ukrainians (yes Ukrainian villages are cleaner and nicer than Russian ones, and yes Ukrainians are historically less violent than Russians), and this is a simple verifiable:
In 1996 Russians consumed about 4 times more alcohol per capita than Ukrainians. This is a historical fact. I have known elderly people who had moved from Ukraine to Russia in the 1940s and the massive level of drinking compared to Ukraine that they encountered in Russia was one of their strongest impressions. This was also true of impressions of Ukrainians who had moved to Russia in the 1970s and 1980s to work in the gas industry.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_alcohol_consumption_per_capita
To suggest no difference in drinking patterns is to reveal ignorance about Ukrainians and Russians, the kind that leads one to assume no differences in other areas such as village life and appearances, and yes violent behavior.
Comment coming from the same ignorance that leads one to believe that Russians and Ukrainians drink in similar quantities.
In language as in culture Ukrainians are about as close to Poles as to Russians although there is a continuum: Galicians are closer to Poles but Kharkivites are closer to Russians.
:::::::::::::
I become more impressed with Poles every day I have been here in Poland. Such kind and wonderful people. For example, at a tourist castle I tried to buy a book but they didn’t take credit cards or dollars, so I walked away. A few minutes later a Pole tapped me and gave me the book; he had overheard the exchange. Such events are typical.
Ukraine has no Nato charter chapter 5 protection against conventional war. Nor non-conventional war neither. America used a nuclear weapon against a city in mainland Japan, then they used another one on a city. Two cities! In Donbass it would be against military forces. Moreover Russia has 20,000 dead and Ukraine a fraction of that, so Russia needs to settle accounts with Ukraine before ending the war, and that means a lot of killing of Ukrainian soldiers; Putin can't do it conventionally, I think the Donbass offensive is not going to get going and even if it does it is guaranteed to fail. A very big bang with ten thousand dead is going to be the only way out. It fits with the Russian preference for non-economy of force and over the top gigantism in tactics, as written about by Peter Vigor.Replies: @Seraphim, @Wokechoke
The open or blank check to Ukraine can’t be sustained unless US and Germany restructure their economies. The production capacity of the war gear is not infinite.
https://youtu.be/CvA7zFGuPls?t=1818As Beebe said before the shooting started, Ukraine could only be whole if neither Russia or America pulled at it, because the West of Ukraine cannot be taken into a Nato's orbit and the East is not gong to enter the Russian fold From what I can gather, West Ukraine was owned by Poles and run by Jews, so not much change.Replies: @Wokechoke
But you should pay attention to Dmitri when he writes that I am usually right about Ukraine and Ukrainians (yes Ukrainian villages are cleaner and nicer than Russian ones, and yes Ukrainians are historically less violent than Russians), and this is a simple verifiable:
In 1996 Russians consumed about 4 times more alcohol per capita than Ukrainians. This is a historical fact. I have known elderly people who had moved from Ukraine to Russia in the 1940s and the massive level of drinking compared to Ukraine that they encountered in Russia was one of their strongest impressions. This was also true of impressions of Ukrainians who had moved to Russia in the 1970s and 1980s to work in the gas industry.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_alcohol_consumption_per_capita
To suggest no difference in drinking patterns is to reveal ignorance about Ukrainians and Russians, the kind that leads one to assume no differences in other areas such as village life and appearances, and yes violent behavior. Comment coming from the same ignorance that leads one to believe that Russians and Ukrainians drink in similar quantities.
In language as in culture Ukrainians are about as close to Poles as to Russians although there is a continuum: Galicians are closer to Poles but Kharkivites are closer to Russians.
:::::::::::::
I become more impressed with Poles every day I have been here in Poland. Such kind and wonderful people. For example, at a tourist castle I tried to buy a book but they didn’t take credit cards or dollars, so I walked away. A few minutes later a Pole tapped me and gave me the book; he had overheard the exchange. Such events are typical.Replies: @silviosilver
Can you speak or understand Polish at all?
The West only needs to outlast a sanctioned Russia in productive capacity and stored weapons and ammo.
A little; it’s a bit easier than Russian when I was in Russia for the first time. But I’ve only been here for less than a week and am in non Polish speaking company most of the time (I speak English with my Polish cousins and Ukrainian with my Ukrainian ones).
I’m told that refugees become functionally fluent in Polish after about 2 months which sounds very realistic. So as a result of this war there will be an entire generation of many Polish-speaking Ukrainians, even from places like Kharkiv, with a hatred of Russia and love of Poland.
In comparison to Russia, the productive capacity of America combined with Germany in what they chose to make is infinite. However, Russia’s military fragility has taken some of the edge off of what George Beebe calls the WW2 analogy (necessity of avoiding appeasement) and very few people think Russia can achieve its objectives in the upcoming Donbass with a WW2 type assault that only the WW2 Germans were ever able to pull off. Unless the Russians have been busy building a couple of huge tunnels that will let their armies pop up hundreds of miles in the rear of the Ukrainian prepared defences, I really cannot see them succeeding in their double envelopment. The military technology advantages of the Ukrainians new weapons and amount of supplies are increasing by the day and any Russian gains will increase what the Ukraine is getting by an order of magnitude. When almost every platoon in carrying multiple deadly anti tank missiles that can be used as portable general purpose artillery and launched at enemy soldiers too, how on earth are the infantry going to protect the tanks. Masses of anti tank missiles fired at the Argentinian infantry was how the British won in the Falklands.
It was Trump who started giving weapons’ to Ukraine, there was and is no one seriously arguing it was a mistake because they think in terms of how WW2 started , but avoiding another Munich is only one of the ways WW3 could be prevented. Another precedent to worry about would be the unintended confluence of decisions by the big players that led to WW1.
As Beebe said before the shooting started, Ukraine could only be whole if neither Russia or America pulled at it, because the West of Ukraine cannot be taken into a Nato’s orbit and the East is not gong to enter the Russian fold From what I can gather, West Ukraine was owned by Poles and run by Jews, so not much change.
Only qualified. Restructuring the economy would have prevented the war machine from having to surrender.
There’s only so much wartime that people will ever tolerate if they too are not at war though.Replies: @Sean
https://youtu.be/CvA7zFGuPls?t=1818As Beebe said before the shooting started, Ukraine could only be whole if neither Russia or America pulled at it, because the West of Ukraine cannot be taken into a Nato's orbit and the East is not gong to enter the Russian fold From what I can gather, West Ukraine was owned by Poles and run by Jews, so not much change.Replies: @Wokechoke
But, the economy would have to restructure. They say that Britain was a few weeks from starvation in ww2 and ww1 at certain points.
Only qualified. Restructuring the economy would have prevented the war machine from having to surrender.
There’s only so much wartime that people will ever tolerate if they too are not at war though.
The military doctrine of the Russian army is defensive, whereby the enemy advance and get destroyed by howitzers all set up with plenty of ammunition. This preferred tactic of Russia is the worst thing to be good at for an army that is being thrown into fighting offensively over -against an enemy with targeting drones, and counter-battery systems. Note the America artilery given to Ukraine is towed, they can sit and wait all set up for the Russians like a slider for a fly. The Russians are going to get blown to kingdom come Furthermore in cities, artillery does surprisingly little beyond rearranging the cover for NLAW teams (who also have a formidable weapon to use against other infantry too). Mariupol has not fallen yet. So far Russia has proved extremely technically inept: vulnerable in the manufacturing supply chain as well as diplomatically, PR-wise, in the air, at sea, and on land. Is there anything they are not bad at?Boris is not half American like his hero Churchill, but Johnson has zero interest in what happens north of Watford; he is a London bankers man. Actually a great deal of the surviving productive capacity in Britain is part of the arms industry, which is going to be getting a lot of contracts on the basis of how effective the weapons are proving. As always, the important thing is to stick to the French, who are dying inside with all the good publicity UK merchants of death are getting.Replies: @Wokechoke
Houellebecq was writing about books he read when he was young on Unherd today:
https://unherd.com/2022/04/the-books-that-made-me/Replies: @Yevardian
Have you read Brenan’s The Spanish Labyrinth on the subject? That’s still a classic, it goes impressively in-depth with Spain’s demographics, political factions and geography as well.
Only qualified. Restructuring the economy would have prevented the war machine from having to surrender.
There’s only so much wartime that people will ever tolerate if they too are not at war though.Replies: @Sean
Since Suez the establishment in Britain are going to do whatever the US tells them to, and the US is framing this as appeasement will cause further aggression Hitler – WW2 problem, although Russia is barely a match for Ukraine and would be outnumbered 4:1 against Nato (in other wordsPputin has a twelfth of the force he’d need to attack Nato.
The military doctrine of the Russian army is defensive, whereby the enemy advance and get destroyed by howitzers all set up with plenty of ammunition. This preferred tactic of Russia is the worst thing to be good at for an army that is being thrown into fighting offensively over -against an enemy with targeting drones, and counter-battery systems. Note the America artilery given to Ukraine is towed, they can sit and wait all set up for the Russians like a slider for a fly. The Russians are going to get blown to kingdom come Furthermore in cities, artillery does surprisingly little beyond rearranging the cover for NLAW teams (who also have a formidable weapon to use against other infantry too). Mariupol has not fallen yet. So far Russia has proved extremely technically inept: vulnerable in the manufacturing supply chain as well as diplomatically, PR-wise, in the air, at sea, and on land. Is there anything they are not bad at?
Boris is not half American like his hero Churchill, but Johnson has zero interest in what happens north of Watford; he is a London bankers man. Actually a great deal of the surviving productive capacity in Britain is part of the arms industry, which is going to be getting a lot of contracts on the basis of how effective the weapons are proving. As always, the important thing is to stick to the French, who are dying inside with all the good publicity UK merchants of death are getting.
What’s happening around Kharkov and Izyum right now could prove decisive. If Russians can’t keep key strategic ground they ought to pack up.Replies: @Dmitry
I’m not sure about the theory of an elite British trained soldiers.
British soldiers have months or years of elite training.
Whereas Ukraine? Maybe a small proportion of Ukrainian soldiers have some training from British soldiers. I read some of the British soldiers are training them to use the NLAWs, but this is only weeks or days of training.
Most Ukrainian forces are recently volunteers.
–
A story I saw posted today, of an international (Canadian) soldier, writing about Ukrainian soldiers.
“Two Ukrainian soldiers came out of the trench to smoke. I told them to put out their cigarettes and go back to cover while I looked for the position of the Russian tanks. They didn’t listen and even ventured close to the edge of the forest, trying to show me the location of Russian tanks. I told them to come back immediately to take shelter and not to expose themselves like this again.”
“Twenty seconds later, I was fifteen meters from the soldiers. I was watching with my binoculars. A huge explosion shook me. I looked to my left. The two Ukrainian soldiers were lying on the ground.. Infantry procedures and drills are important. Here we see a striking example.” old.reddit.com/r/RussiaUkraineWar2022/comments/u6ni5v/canadian_sniper_wali_with_an_update
If you think about key trends of Belarus – low birthrate, rapidly aging population, emigration of young and educated people.
These trends are positive to Lukashenko’s position, other things equal. More young and educated people exit the country, more he can assume internal stability, by comparison to a scenario where he has to sit with these people.
Although even a lot of the IT outsourcing population is trapped from emigration by the bureaucratic isolation of Belarus, except to Russia, which is not high part of desirable destinations for them.
In some talks, Lukashenko is even implying he might have to close the “Belarus Hi-Tech Park” (where a lot of the IT outsourcing was).
This makes sense as the IT outsourcing industry of Belarus had been one of the centre of the 2020 protests and it associated with Valery Tsepkalo. But outsourcing was also one of growing sources of income for the country, which doesn’t have many future industries.
It’s funny, if you look at the Geely’s media and investment information, they do not say they have this factory. It’s like embarrassing for them? http://zgh.com/locations/?lang=en
But it’s an investment in Belarus, which is not damaged by the current scenario, as Geely are only building cars for the Russian market there.
Because of sanctions, Geely will have less competition exporting cars for the Russian market, so perhaps this factory will have a larger market.
Although overall, China would be mainly interested for investing in Belarus (as in Russia), because of its connection to the EU, and we don’t need to say, this has now been mostly removed.
I haven’t, I knew it by reputation and you would frequently see it in bibliographies of books in English on the SCW but I never found a copy. It seems I can get it from my local library though, so I may request it now.
- A story I saw posted today, of an international (Canadian) soldier, writing about Ukrainian soldiers. "Two Ukrainian soldiers came out of the trench to smoke. I told them to put out their cigarettes and go back to cover while I looked for the position of the Russian tanks. They didn't listen and even ventured close to the edge of the forest, trying to show me the location of Russian tanks. I told them to come back immediately to take shelter and not to expose themselves like this again.""Twenty seconds later, I was fifteen meters from the soldiers. I was watching with my binoculars. A huge explosion shook me. I looked to my left. The two Ukrainian soldiers were lying on the ground.. Infantry procedures and drills are important. Here we see a striking example." old.reddit.com/r/RussiaUkraineWar2022/comments/u6ni5v/canadian_sniper_wali_with_an_updateReplies: @Wokechoke
There were manoeuvres in 29 Palms a few months ago where 5 Commando were sent to game the USMC. The USMC was made to act like the Russians (stripped of a lot of communications gear) while the Commando was designed to look like what we are seeing in Ukrainian tactics and operations. A hybrid of spotters and drone operators and platoons running around with NLAWs…Antitank, Manpads… the Daily Mail bragged about it “Brits Beat Yanks” I thought it was either simulating conditions in Taiwan or Crimea. It proved to be a test case for Ukraine. The Airborne in Britain have conducted joint operations with Ukraine too. Several drops and some helicopter based operations.
The military doctrine of the Russian army is defensive, whereby the enemy advance and get destroyed by howitzers all set up with plenty of ammunition. This preferred tactic of Russia is the worst thing to be good at for an army that is being thrown into fighting offensively over -against an enemy with targeting drones, and counter-battery systems. Note the America artilery given to Ukraine is towed, they can sit and wait all set up for the Russians like a slider for a fly. The Russians are going to get blown to kingdom come Furthermore in cities, artillery does surprisingly little beyond rearranging the cover for NLAW teams (who also have a formidable weapon to use against other infantry too). Mariupol has not fallen yet. So far Russia has proved extremely technically inept: vulnerable in the manufacturing supply chain as well as diplomatically, PR-wise, in the air, at sea, and on land. Is there anything they are not bad at?Boris is not half American like his hero Churchill, but Johnson has zero interest in what happens north of Watford; he is a London bankers man. Actually a great deal of the surviving productive capacity in Britain is part of the arms industry, which is going to be getting a lot of contracts on the basis of how effective the weapons are proving. As always, the important thing is to stick to the French, who are dying inside with all the good publicity UK merchants of death are getting.Replies: @Wokechoke
You should look at the so called towns and villages in Ukraine around Donbas. The architecture in Kiev suburbs is comparable to Newark in New Jersey or OHare airport in Chicago. In Europe it matches Slough or Harrow and the area around Heathrow. Certainly Gostomel airport has that feel. Concrete, dense, light industry, warehouses, box stores etc. In Donbas? The villages there are small, pretty flimsy and spread out. I’ve looked carefully at the towns north of Kramatorsk and Slovyansk. It’s not really build up, the NLAW teams will have to hide in forests.
I think you ought to stop trolling about the Azovstal factory. I only have pity for the Lunatics holed up there. They are trying to reenact Masada. It’s a joke script written by some movie producer. The episode echoes.
https://youtu.be/m-1U2h5gNM8?list=PLPIKF8DNGQpx6zpOc2AtVkO4gLojwezru&t=1265
The one thing Russia was good at was nuclear weapons, they are living on a parity of decades ago. As the US pulls away. Russia will get paranoid about America's technical edge and progressively take the safeties off of its nukes.Replies: @Wokechoke
Actually the urbanized fighting around Kiev was won by the Russians due to the sheer weight of 30mm cannon fire their numerous APCs directed at the Ukrainians . Where Russia’s offensive in the West came unstuck was when trying to advance quickly along a limited number of roads where their columns were halted on roads by NLAWs and them pounded by artillery, which Ukraine had a lot of. Russia is a very backward country that achieve the status of superpower because the US los its confidence as a result of Vietnam.
The one thing Russia was good at was nuclear weapons, they are living on a parity of decades ago. As the US pulls away. Russia will get paranoid about America’s technical edge and progressively take the safeties off of its nukes.
No problem of that exists exists in Kramatorsk.
My main question now is how the Ukrainians might be organising a late summer operational offensive . Can they, will they? I guess the Ukies are hoping to replicate the Croatian refit that drove out Serb militias from Krajina. Serbia was definitely not as capable as Russia is.
https://youtu.be/m-1U2h5gNM8?list=PLPIKF8DNGQpx6zpOc2AtVkO4gLojwezru&t=1265
The one thing Russia was good at was nuclear weapons, they are living on a parity of decades ago. As the US pulls away. Russia will get paranoid about America's technical edge and progressively take the safeties off of its nukes.Replies: @Wokechoke
Nah, not quite. The Russians moved through the largely unpopulated Chernobyl area and when they found built up burbs around the Gostomel airport they ran into trouble moving forward. I’d agree that they were limited by roads but they were also troubled by the density of the capital.
No problem of that exists exists in Kramatorsk.
My main question now is how the Ukrainians might be organising a late summer operational offensive . Can they, will they? I guess the Ukies are hoping to replicate the Croatian refit that drove out Serb militias from Krajina. Serbia was definitely not as capable as Russia is.
Russian assault commanders talked in clear to each other about the airport attack for four days before they did it. The Ukrainians were all set up and waiting, with artillery.
Ukraine has a lot of assistance not obvious to us from America such as the aforementioned airpost ‘surprise’ attack in which the VDV were defeated by reservists. Some of the best Ukrainian Special Forces were killed in the villages around Kiev. Russians took losses but the sheer weight of 30mm cannon fire was decisive in letting them advance in street fighting.Artillery stopped the Russians. Defeating Russia will not be a problem, doing so without giving Ukraine enough to go on and humiliate Russia is going to be extremely difficult to get just right.
Why not overcompensate a bit and not have this “worry”?…
Oh I don’t know, I anticipate roaming disgruntled El Azovites armed with NLAWs and a chip on their shoulder to end up blasting away at targets in Paris, Berlin and Rome. About that so Called Russian Mafia…
Yes, the only things that could ever cause someone to misunderstand you is malice or stupidity. Got it.
Iyi geceler, Yevardian. Get some sleep. You sound like you need it.