I will be in the woods with my people when Chinese nukes wipe this cancer from the face of my motherland. When the troops land to clean up, I will wave the flag of true Sino-Friendship, and Xi Jinping will call me to his office in Beijing, where I will be appointed President of Harvard University and granted development rights for Stargate – for both television and film.

More likely, you’ll be in a concentration camp out in the Nevada desert where FDR jailed the American citizens who looked Japanese during WWII.

You need to LOOK like you’re one of them.

Andrew!? With the death of Sheldon Adleson this year, will China keep his casinos? Is it possible the Jewish empire actually had delusions they could attach like tics to China and ruin them, too?

They’re about out of hosts to attach to, China would be a great one. The Empire of Jews, they really handicap their causes by insisting on everyone accepting their agenda of sexual perversion. There are simply Eastern Bloc countries and China who simply aren’t going to allow their societies to be ruined by sexual perversions. The perverts are trying to ruin Taiwan as fast as they can with perversion agenda, which is why I’ve been watching for a Chinese takeover of Taiwan before THAT society can be finished off in a moral sense with the perversion agenda. Hungary is being told, allow the ruin of your society with sexual perversions, or get out of the E.U. And now yesterday, Turkey just pulled its government out of a UN program involving the acceptance of trans/gay/lesbian progress in women’s rights. Another country, rejecting perversions. So there’s hope. These countries know that if they accept enhanced versions of feminist women’s rights, along with that comes a weaponized sexual perversion agenda. It’s what the jewish feministsand their media do.

The Alphabet Soup of Sexual Depravity is working overtime. Xi, Vlad and most of the Eastern bloc is resisting. The West is ruined, Korea, Japan, all corrupted, all perverted. All of this is outgrowth from the women’s movement begun in the modern, sexually-depraved fashion beginning circa 1965. The sexual perversions and ‘freedoms’ were about wrecking society. It’s how they advanced. Everywhere you allow the women their free hand, especially the jewish feminists of the 60s onward, expect their sexual-perversion-politics to follow. They did a fine job on the U.S. and Europe. You gotta give it to them.

It won’t be nukes and it won’t be an occupation. China would want no part of our filthy culture and corrupt, perverted society. Only way that gets fixed is internally and that simply isn’t in the cards. We’ll simply be an isolated pariah while the rest of the world moves on from us, the West that is. When China takes Taiwan and we don’t do shit about it because we can’t, that’s the day the world learns our military and empty sanctions are powerless, worthy only of mockery.

China has made zero aggressive moves against the West

If you don’t count their industrial espionage and infiltration of US government (itself no prize.)

The red chinks can cram it. They are no better than the Shlomo-run circus.

“All of this is outgrowth from the women’s movement begun in the modern, sexually-depraved fashion beginning circa 1965. The sexual perversions and ‘freedoms’ were about wrecking society. It’s how they advanced. Everywhere you allow the women their free hand, especially the jewish feminists of the 60s onward, expect their sexual-perversion-politics to follow. They did a fine job on the U.S. and Europe. You gotta give it to them.”

“Oh…Let’s blame the women, again” for all of the world’s out of control male-ego-related problems?

So…let’s take away women’s hard earned, centuries’ fought legal rights, and knuckle them once again, under depraved male authority that operates with the law of the jungle??

This wanna be “King of the Jungle” male suppressed eg0-need (“since circa 1965” ) for absolute power and control appears to be a growing perversion among patriarchal bastards, especially religious ones, who want to retain their empty-headed, heavy-handedness over their female counterparts in order to act like the chest-thumping, dumb-witted bab00ns that they really are, and have never evolved very far from.

This is a dangerous, growing, cultural “throwback” toward women and falls just short of “slapping them across the face if they get out of hand” (circa 1950 as approved recently by Paul Craig Roberts). Anthropological evidence proves that during cultural crises, men become more violent toward their women. This is reflected in today’s Globalists’ caused Covid Crisis and the buildup to WW3 against China & Russia.

“Male emotional maturity” is always in question (due to a defunct XY chromosome, instead of XX, according to anthropologist Ashley Montague). Times of historic stress proves this. And this explains why men are blaming women, yet again, for today’s male-caused, world problems of dominance among each other (and each other’s country).

The name is “Xi,” not “XI.” It’s a name, not a Roman numeral. (Also, it’s “Chinese people,” not “China people.”)

I would really like to see China, Russia, Iran, the Koreas and Japan expand to some if their old territories and reunify with those respective nations (Japan would just be getting a few islands unless they do something wild with the Koreas). This would be a nicer world.

Death won’t come for the current American State from abroad because that wound be merciful. We are meant in this world to suffer and grow, and there is much more growth and suffering to be done here before America is rebuilt into something better and more…American. (I’m still rooting for Pan North\Central American Unification). That aside, part of America’s tragedy is that we are an untouchable (except by missiles) Island fortress whose opportunity was entirely wasted on global empire.

Good for them, though. They should keep standing strong.

China has made zero aggressive moves against the West

But that is not the point:

… It is also consistent with the arguments of the most honest kind of “China hawk,” who argues that the real problem with Beijing is not that it wants to dominate the world, but that it might stop the U.S. from doing so in a unipolar manner.

https://www.globalresearch.ca/china-real-threat-america-ruling-ideology/5733887

More quotes from Hanania:

China’s true menace is neither military nor geopolitical, but rather ideological. Its continuing success, even if it in no way harms the prosperity or security of most Americans, poses a major threat to the American political establishment, how it justifies its own power, and its understanding of the U.S. role in the world.

and,

So, what question should American leaders be asking? It is not whether China will become more powerful, which it certainly will, or whether it will democratize, which is out of American hands and not relevant to its security anyway. Rather, it’s whether China has ambitions beyond what the U.S. can live with…

Which implies that the American political elites believe that it is up to them to decide what ambitions China can have.

And from another article:

… In that sense, the contradiction between the US and China is not a conflict of interests between the American people and Chinese people. But it is a contradiction between the US governing elite and 1.4 billion Chinese dreamers.

How then are we to look at the China-US contradiction in moral or ethical terms? Given the US goal of hegemony versus the Chinese dream of a Western standard of living, which has the greater claim on the support of decent humans everywhere? The 1.4 billion Chinese dreamers or a tiny US governing elite?

https://asiatimes.com/2021/05/stark-contradiction-at-root-of-us-china-conflict/

depending on how you count Madame Song, Zhu De, and Ye Jianying, he is the 11th President/General Secretary/Chair. Might be an allusion to that.

When the Chinese occupation finally comes, I’ll be waiting for the usual sinophobes/hasbara plants like Sick of Orcs, A123, and Achmed E. Newman to slowly fall silent. Only then will Xi have achieved final victory. I’ll be chuckling and applying for the Role of Dalian Rose back here.

LOL,

Andy was validvictorian at Stormfront U.

Well put. It seems that the U.S./Western/Globalist elite have lost the war before they can even start it. They do not war only against China, but against the entire world.

If you frequent internet fora around the world, you will notice a great many commenters are sick of the Western boot, and are rooting for, or at least non-hostile to China.

The only catch is, in the process of losing it all, said elite will drag the whole West down with them. Unless decent people expose their motives, and stop them.

Naw; remember in the late 1970’s at the first peak of the survivalist movement?

Then Lyme disease suddenly appeared. The illness had apparently always been around, but so rare as to go largely undiagnosed.

The new outbreaks were thought related to tick borne disease experiments on Plum Island. The object of those experiments was too sabotage the Soviet food supply.

Then prion disease then became widespread in wild cervid populations via the irrational promotion of game farming those animals. Despite warnings from real experts who warned that this is what would happen.

The wild food supply can be made no safer if not far less than the domestic food supply, SHTF.

Ironically, early U.S. nuclear war planning would have relied on the wild food supply for recovery. Sabotaging that strategically made no sense except as a Europe First over America First tactic.

Europe First globalist elites seek to determine what China’s ambitions are, no differently than they try and determine what America’s ambitions are. They can determine who the elites will be.

Indigenous American elites are themselves under the gun, such that only Donald Trump represents America First. The COVID-19 economic shutdowns also resets the elites.

The Euro financial aristocracy presides over a globalist soft power empire, to which America’s hard power answers.

The Opium Wars were about access to China. The present conflict is no different. By Mackinder, Europe is too small to be a natural base of world empire without access to and ownership of the cream productive resources, land and people, from more natural geographical-political giants like the U.S., Russia and of course China.

Hmmm.

Well, I’d hesitate over looking forward to any Chinese liberation-by-force. Replacing one Euro-First big government with another Europe-First big government doesn’t seem like much of a deal.

China’s liberating force came as the production of cheap goods, freeing Americans to do better than mindless assembly labour and sunset industrialization. China was central to a rising world economy that floated everyone’s boat, the U.S. included. Europe also benefited, but at a slower pace in keeping with their Mackinderan limitations.

The exchange rate between the $US an Reminbi was always maintained at 1:6, so China subsidized the U.S. economy with products starting at least six times cheaper, plus the business opportunities access to China’s industrialization presented.

China also needs America’s most critical export, the U.S. dollar, to maintain the balance of trade. Technically, they can’t de-dollarize; that beef is more over China not over-buying dollars to unrealistic levels of U.S. budget subsidization.

At first I bought into the argument that China stole jobs, before realizing those jobs were already on the way out as automation and AI tech improved. What was offshored, was already doomed. China is an assembly nation moreso than a ground-up industrial nation. The U.S. was able to skip the worst social angst and chaos from the first wave of de-industrialization using China.

Its no accident that friction with China is occurring as the Western transition to an AI-IT economy is being completed and the profit margins from China’s cheap and aging labour drop. Paying off America’s middle class is less of a priority now as opposed to breaking it once and for all.

America’s canary in the coal mine, Canada, has recently committed to total economic suicide, banning the sale of new gasoline-powered cars by 2035. America’s globalist Rockerfellers were documented as responsible for torpedoing Canada’s oil industry, cashing up idiotlogical environmentalism.

Climate change, COVID-1984, and conflict with China are pretexts for the second wave of de-industrialization, and they will not build back better for everyone anymore than the last time.

China can’t ‘save’ America this time around; the very concept is knee-jerk mindless obnoxious to Americans anyway. However, the best years of middle class prosperity were in peaceful world trade with as many countries as possible.

China also probably understands less about the Europe First threat than Americans do, and will welcome Euro investment into their economy over the U.S. and learn to hate Americans. Russia has had no choice but to denominate their debt in Euros. Meaning, America can’t benefit or influence with soft power, a rising Russia.

Even as U.S. pressure forces China to open up more to European globalists, the U.S. cuts itself – or rather their unvetted elites and middle class – off from China. What kind of deal is that?

When the troops land to clean up, I will wave the flag of true Sino-Friendship, and Xi Jinping will call me to his office in Beijing, where I will be appointed President of Harvard University and granted development rights for Stargate – for both television and film.

If they ever get to the United States, Xi Jinping will have his stormtroopers bind you and take you to a facility where you will either be a test subject for their germ-warfare experiments, or will have your organs extracted BEFORE you die and your carcass is thrown into a furnace with all the other victims.

But yeah keep waving your flag and insulting and slandering Jews. Wow, what a leader you are.

Yes I believe Hungary recently passed some laws seen by the west as “anti homosexual”… Well makes perfect sense that Hungary is becoming more friendly with China – allowing a new university and using Chinese vaccines. Heat was already being turned up on Hungary – so I expect it to continue further.

These countries know that if they accept enhanced versions of feminist women’s rights, along with that comes a weaponized sexual perversion agenda. It’s what the jewish feministsand their media do.

Oh, shut up, Jim. Men did gay rights, because your half of the species likes the idea of it being socially acceptable to f*** with no strings attached.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2017/09/28/for-hugh-hefner-gay-rights-were-part-of-the-sexual-revolution/

https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/playboy-founder-hugh-hefner-early-proponent-lgbtq-rights-n805591

https://www.vox.com/identities/2017/9/28/16379500/hugh-hefner-lgbtq-rights

https://www.politico.com/story/2012/08/hefner-gay-rights-under-assault-079930

Hefner: Gay marriage is a “fight for all our rights!”

Xi states that China will defend itself if attacked, and immediately the guppy-mouthed slags and grunting wannabe William Calleys of Fox News start screeching that ‘China is THREATENING the US’. The USA was always going to destroy humanity, and here we go.

Staggering racist, Orientalist, ignorance concerning China, allied to omnicidal stupidity in denying climate destabilisation, from CANADA!!!?? where the evidence for rapid climate destabilisation in the heat dome catastrophe has not penetrated the dumbest Rightist cranium. Homo ‘sapiens’? Are you kidding?

The US attempted to do to China what they did to their puppet, Japan, in 1985, with the Plaza Accords-throttle their economy and make it subservient to the USA and Israel. When the Chinese politely sniggered, it sent racist cane-toads like Pompeo, and a thousand like him in running chihuahua Austfailia, into a genocidal frenzy. The aim now is to DESTROY China and set it back a thousand years, more if possible. To watch the human-ish detritus on Fox News quaking with rage as they denounce China is to see ULTIMATE Evil in action.

Which implies that the American political elites believe that it is up to them to decide what ambitions China can have.

Spare me. Every single country in the entire history of humanity has made it a point to keep an eye on their rivals’ ambitions.

42

And this explains why men are blaming women, yet again, for today’s male-caused, world problems of dominance among each other (and each other’s country).

The whole manosphere consists of a bunch of selfish, degenerate crybabies who refuse to get married and have children unless they get to have total power in the relationship. To justify this petulance, they have to depict women as hellspawn, by any means necessary.

It is just naked grab of territory re- Taiwan, as regardless of the Nationalists or the Japs a moment earlier that developed the hell out of it, it never was part of any chinese empire, but rather, like Japan, the pirate island of which was a nuisance.

So fuck off.

China will take as much as it can, just as the average Chinese would in their own life. Excepting those people who maintained virtue through the “Cultural Revolution.” The Gov. there apparently has none of them.

women as hellspawn

As “Saint” Augustine so charmingly wrote, inter faeces urinamque nascimur, revealing both the classic Christian horror of female sexuality and its adherents’ raging self-hatred for being so attracted to it. Convince people that their most human instinct is evil, and you create a broken hearted population susceptible to manipulate in whatever way most pleases the sociopaths in charge.

Spare me. Every single country in the entire history of humanity has made it a point to keep an eye on their rivals’ ambitions.

If you have 5, instead of 2, eyes, the other 3 will not be contented just to keep themselves on their rivals. Rather, they will try to keep them down by “bombing them back to the Stone Age”– as in Vietnam, I-raq, etc, which were not even large enough to “rival” of murrika in anyway.

murrikans want to flatten anyone who refuses to submit to its dictates.

China will take as much as it can, just as the average Chinese would in their own life.

China will do a lot more. The following is my response to a Jap who called himself “Kara no Kyoukai” on another forum:

Devils Advocate_1in reply to Kara no Kyoukai

Kara no Kyoukai reply to Pacific 15th, 04:30

China never defeated Japan. Japan surrendered only to the United States…

.
There is some truth in your statement and it only confirms what many believe, which is that the Japanese only respect BRUTE FORCE. There is also some eerie similarity in mentality between the Japan of today and Germany between the World Wars.
.
After WWI, the German army felt “betrayed” by their politicians, who surrendered “without being militarily defeated”. As a result the German right-wing did not feel obliged to accept the terms of their defeat. All that changed after WWII, in which Germany was not only soundly defeated but did so by its main victim– USSR. The Rape of Berlin woke up the Germans so much that the denial of the Holocaust became a crime in Germany.
.
The fact that the main victims of Imperial Japan– China, Korea– did not actually militarily defeat Japan makes the Japanese right-wing arrogant. They feel that they are superior to their former victims while instinctively submitting to their white conquerors. It will have to take a “Rape of Tokyo” to bring them to their senses.
.
Needless to say, your statement above merely admits that, of the War in the Pacific and East Asia, only the part between Japan and the US is settled. The part between Japan and its Asian victims is still unfinished and remains suspended. Like the war in Europe, it will take a 2nd session to bring it to conclusion. Fortunately, unlike the first session, this 2nd session will be fought when the aggressor, Japan, will be weak while its victims, China, Korea and other Asian countries, will be strong. THAT will be poetic justice done!
.
Devil’s

What the Japs did to the Chinese was comparable to those of the Mongols and the Manchus. So, work that out for yourself.

Oh, shut up, Jim. Men did gay rights, because your half of the species

Oooooooooh! She species bombed you Jimbrowski, not sex, not races, but species! you’re not going to stand for that are you Mr. Honkus Maleus Americanus?

murrikans want to flatten anyone who refuses to submit to its dictates.

I’m not a historian nor an expert in geopolitics, so I could be wrong, but my impression is that superpowers have never been particularly benevolent going all the way back to ancient Mesopotamia.

While I don’t approve of foreign warmongering, I do not see any reason to expect China to be any more benevolent than the United States has been.

The thought of 1.4 billion chinks taking a dump and pissing rivers of sludge through cities and towns, while riding on the prosperity of western ingenuity, reminds me of the hive mind mentality of ants, oblivious to their roll in destroying everything around them.
While the disgust of watching blacks, Burn Loot Murder, play knockout on unsuspecting people, rape, rob and carjack with impunity, demand reparations from whites who’s ancestors died freeing them from slavery 150 years ago, reminds me of zombies feeding off the carcass of half dead bodies while watching them suffer until they self suicide just to stop the pain.
Two human rodent species that should be eradicated from the face of the earth and far distant galaxies.

Xi just simply made a wordplay that his good friend Putin used recently regarding anyone impinging on Russian territory… He mentioned something about barking dogs and made reference to “smashing teeth”. I wonder if Fox complained then?

The Nationalists took all of the currency and precious metals reserves for the whole of China with them to Taiwan. Not that complicated. And only an imperialist Japanese still smarting you lost your empire could claim it’s a land grab. When will Japan stop claiming Kuril Islands? When will it let Okinawa go free? When will it stop claiming rocks that Korea does??? Are Japanese still land grabbing?

I rest my case that Western elites intend genocide against the Chinese. Barely beneath the surface of the ranting, hate-crazed, lying of the Fox, ABC, BBC etc vermin, and their political allies, lies the even more unhinged murderousness of scum like this.

Rosie you are a typical Orientalist ignoramus. You know NOTHING of Chinese civilization, so merely project Western aggression and lust to dominate onto the Chinese. A Chinese-led world would be vastly different, and would, in fact, survive, possibly, the multiple cataclysms facing humanity. Under US and Western dominance humanity ceases to exist.

The largest Japanese forces, by far, were in Manchuria, and the Soviets obliterated them in days. The Japs surrendered to the USA in order to PRESERVE the Emperor system and fascistic governance. Therefore Japan has been a one Party state, that of the Imperialist fascists, since 1955. As scum like Abe, the Nanjing Holocaust denier show, Japan is more or less unchanged. A perfect ally/stooge for the Great Satan.

reminds me of the hive mind mentality of ants

The Chinese are not like ants. An ant is a member of the colony and not an individual. The Chinese are individuals in all the wrong ways. They are hyperconsumerist and status-driven in a way that Westerners are not. Confucius won out over Lao Tzu, and here we are.

https://www.theatlantic.com/china/archive/2013/12/are-chinese-people-the-worlds-most-materialistic/282398/

All that said, I wish them no harm.

I rest my case that Western elites intend genocide against the Chinese.

And in furtherance of this nefarious conspiracy, they have exported our technology and industrial base wholesale to China, lifting bazillion of them out of poverty, to the great detriment of our own native White working class, who now subsist on welfare on heroin.

How can I get it on some of that “genocide”?

“The Chinese are individuals in all the wrong ways. They are hyperconsumerist and status-driven in a way that Westerners are not.”

Blah, blah, blah,… here come another holier-than thou Westerner. Let’s see some real figures:

per person

One of the perks of population control is that you can enjoy a high standard of living without destroying the environment. We’re not obligated to reduce our standard of living for the benefit of others.

In any event, those numbers are a snapshot. They will go up, though probably not as high as Western countries, where much consumption is driven by the need to get away from certain people. Restrictive covenants prevent the building of small, sustainable housing. Inner city crime drives people to escape to the exurbs 2+ hours from their jobs, etc.

We can all see for ourselves what sort of hypercompetitive, status-obsessed culture you have. Said no Chinese Tiger Mother ever:

Video Link

It is not about China, or any other country, being benevolent or not! It is about this uncontrollable urge to poke one’s dirty and, more often than not, violent hands into other people’s domestic business.

This is what Mahathir had to say about the US and China (also recall AA’s Tiger vs Elephant analogy):

They (the US) are all the time containing China , threatening China , and what would be the response of China? If they ( China) are threatened, then obviously they are going to prepare themselves to face the threat.
.
We have been trading with China for over 1000 years and they never tried to conquer us. The Portuguese came to trade and colonized us. When they see China strong, they think it wants to conquer the world. They say China could re-arm. We don’t think China wants to re-arm to conquer us. There are a lot of American intentions in this area.
.
http://zcomm.org/znetarticle/malaysian-peace-conference-by-maryann-keady/

And Hanania’s observation:

…nor does it seem to want veto power over what governments do in distant lands, as the U.S. has exercised over large swaths of the world.

https://www.globalresearch.ca/china-real-threat-america-ruling-ideology/5733887

China is not a Christian country. Hence, unlike the white Western countries, China does not take a “missionary” position regarding matters on the rest of the world.

From your link:

it is undisputed among economists that trade with China made America better off by lowering the price of goods.

Note the assumption that lower prices = a better America. This is why bean counters shouldn’t be allowed to dictate policy.

While this has undermined U.S. economic capacity in important ways, the cause wasn’t cheating, trickery, or even growth on the part of China. Instead, the cause was the success of American policy priorities. If there is a problem, it is most immediately that those priorities were misguided. The U.S. has the right to conduct trade on its own terms. It can choose what kind of strategy it wants in trade negotiations, and is free to deal with the downsides of neglecting domestic industry and increased competition for jobs through whatever means it considers appropriate.

Then why all the scaremongering about a “trade war” (or even nuclear war!) anytime any American anywhere suggests that maybe we shouldn’t allow foreign goods from countries without comparable environmental standards and workplace protections?

Alternatively, China may be an inwardly focused civilization

An “inwardly focused” civilization would make it a point to develop its own consumer markets rather than depend on foreign ones. They seem to be attempting to develop an export-based economy, which means getting rich by destroying American manufacturing. Whether this is intended or merely coincidental matters not. Nor does it matter that our own treacherous elites have been complicit. They know what they are doing.

The basic question this article asks is what China skeptics are afraid of China doing. Here’s the answer:

https://www.csis.org/analysis/countering-chinas-influence-operations-lessons-australia

We can all see for ourselves what sort of hypercompetitive, status-obsessed culture you have.

And why not??? The alternative is to ACCEPT the status assigned by the white world. The whites, and honourary whites, have been pushing a racial hierarchy that has the whites on the very top, followed by the honourary whites like the Japs, and then the non-whites like the Chinese, with the black Africans at the very bottom of that hierarchy. Why should the Chinese and the Africans accept such a race-based hierarchy?

Below is my exchange with a Bamar house-nigger of the whites on another forum some years ago:

The thought of 1.4 billion chinks taking a dump and pissing rivers of sludge through cities and towns, while riding on the prosperity of western ingenuity, reminds me of the hive mind mentality of ants, oblivious to their roll in destroying everything around them.

Chinks? Maybe you’re referring to these people:

Video Link

One is put in mind of the compradore scum-bag and CIA asset, Liu Xiao-bo, he of the Nobel Piss Prize, declaring that ‘the Chinese would never be fully human until they Westernise’, and that China required three hundred years of Western colonial tutelage before they could become civilized. No wonder the White fascists who dish out the Piss Prize thought him a good ‘House Chink’ and worthy of a pat on the head.

The CSIS is an Imperial lie-factory, its output propaganda shite. The ‘influence’ operations the author recites are merely friendly overtures between Chinese and Australians to promote mutually beneficial relations between people. They are NOTHING to the constant US influence operations and propaganda through ‘protected sources’ of the US Embassy in Australian politics (as outlined in the Manning Wikileaks) and a MSM owned in large part by the Yank, Murdoch, and the rest thortoughly pro-American and Sinophobic. Let alone the TWO occasions (Whitlam and Rudd) where the US had its treacherous agents destroy Australian PMs.
In the collapse of Austrayan-Chinese relations at EVERY stage it was Austfailia the aggressor. From the time that Obama declared war intent with his ‘pivot to Asia’ speech in our Parliament, through the Huawei atrocity, based on NO evidence of Huawei spying, the filthy lies concerning Xinjiang peddled by the ASPI, itself financed by the US State Department and corporations like Raytheon, Lockheed etc, the swanning about in the South China Seas, the attacks on academics working with China, the Federal veto on Victoria’s MUA with China over the BRI, and the incessant, deranged, villainous hate propaganda slushing through the MSM sewer, it has been the Real Evil Empire’s self-proclaimed ‘Deputy’ leading the way. Naturally the MSM vermin filth invert reality and denounce ‘Chinese aggression’. Goebbels and Streicher et al were novices compared to these scum.

What an arrogant, vile and vicious racist you are.

You have veered off to economics, investment and political influence. Not that I know much about any of these subjects, but I think US companies had no choice but to move their production to China because their competitors would certainly do so in time and that would make the US companies unable to compete if they did not do the same.

Anyway, the manufacture of some of these goods has already been moved from China to Vietnam and other developing countries– just like they were moved from the West, Japan, etc to China earlier– because China is no longer competitive enough a place to produce them.

Now, about China attempting to influence “America’s Deputy Sheriff in Asia”, Mearsheimer gave good advice on how it should be done:

We saw the dynamics of the imperial blob explained quite vividly last year by American political analyst John Mearsheimer at a debate hosted by the Australian think tank Center for Independent Studies. Mearsheimer told his audience that the US is going to do everything it can to halt China’s rise and prevent it from becoming the regional hegemon in the eastern hemisphere, and that Australia should align with the US in that battle or else it would face the wrath of Washington.

“The question that’s on the table is what should the Australia’s foreign policy be in light of the rise of China,” Mearsheimer said. “I’ll tell you what I would suggest if I were an Australian.”

Mearsheimer said China is going to continue to grow economically and will convert that economic power into military power to dominate Asia “the way the US dominates the western hemisphere”, and explained why he think the US and its allies have every ability to prevent that from happening.

“Now the question is what does this all mean for Australia?” Mearsheimer said. “Well, you’re in a quandary for sure. Everybody knows what the quandary is. And by the way you’re not the only country in East Asia that’s in this quandary. You trade a lot with China, and that trade is very important for your prosperity, no question about that. Security-wise you really want to go with us. It makes just a lot more sense, right? And you understand that security is more important than prosperity, because if you don’t survive, you’re not gonna prosper.”

“Now some people say there’s an alternative: you can go with China,” said Mearsheimer. “Right you have a choice here: you can go with China rather the United States. There’s two things I’ll say about that. Number one, if you go with China you want to understand you are our enemy. You are then deciding to become an enemy of the United States. Because again, we’re talking about an intense security competition.”

“You’re either with us or against us,” he continued. “And if you’re trading extensively with China, and you’re friendly with China, you’re undermining the United States in this security competition. You’re feeding the beast, from our perspective. And that is not going to make us happy. And when we are not happy you do not want to underestimate how nasty we can be. Just ask Fidel Castro.”

Nervous laughter from the Australian think tank audience punctuated Mearsheimer’s more incendiary observations. The CIA is known to have made numerous attempts to assassinate Castro.

If you’ve ever wondered how the the US is so successful in getting other nations around the world to align with its interests, this is how. It’s not that the US is a good actor on the world stage or a kind friend to its allies, it’s that it will destroy you if you disobey it.

Australia is not aligned with the US to protect itself from China. Australia is aligned with the US to protect itself from the US. As a Twitter follower recently observed, the US doesn’t have allies, only hostages.

https://caitlinjohnstone.com/2020/10/21/america-has-no-allies-only-hostages/

And why not??? The alternative is to ACCEPT the status assigned by the white world. The whites, and honourary whites, have been pushing a racial hierarchy that has the whites on the very top, followed by the honourary whites like the Japs, and then the non-whites like the Chinese, with the black Africans at the very bottom of that hierarchy. Why should the Chinese and the Africans accept such a race-based hierarchy?

Did I take a wrong turn into an SJW hate-whitey forum or something? This is just the same old bullsh!t about how the world would be totally devoid of ethnic chauvinism but for eeeeeevil White people. Of course, nothing could be further from the truth.

Anyway, you give yourself away. The Chinese feel they have something to prove because YT hurt their feelings. That is reason enough to be skeptical of them all by itself. Whites are free to believe we’re the best in our own damned countries, and Chinese are free to feel the same in theirs.

open society, tolerance. asking for it. don’t blame em.

Not that I know much about any of these subjects, but I think US companies had no choice but to move their production to China because their competitors would certainly do so in time and that would make the US companies unable to compete if they did not do the same.

Yes, anytime someone cheats, they make it impossible for others to compete without cheating. (Prisoner’s Dilemma) That’s why you need protective tariffs.

“You’re either with us or against us,” he continued. “And if you’re trading extensively with China, and you’re friendly with China, you’re undermining the United States in this security competition. You’re feeding the beast, from our perspective. And that is not going to make us happy. And when we are not happy you do not want to underestimate how nasty we can be. Just ask Fidel Castro.”

You are asking me to believe that the same U.S. elite that has facilitated the rise of China is now hellbent on keeping it down for no reason other than the desire for unilateral world domination. You must admit this sounds far-fetched. You may be right, of course, but you’re not going to be able to make that case on an internet comment board. If you feel that strongly about it, you might consider writing an article for guest publication or something.

Pathetic. No wonder we lost the country with a shit loyalty score like that. Why are you falling for this trap btw Rosie? They just got you to accept their moral framework. Weak. The way to not lose is to refuse to play by their terms.

Nogs are poor because they are stupid, there’s no other reason. East asians got fucked by the west harder and more recently than Africa. Compare the post colonial progress of East Asia to Africa. Nuff said.

Also, Detroit et. al.

Even starting from the finish line, nogs still managed to lose the race.

It takes time to pick through and analyze the evidence for veracity and strength, and as like the Nazi command, even jokes of such they laughed at was enough to execute them all. And thus the animosity continues, as only truth would have begun the reconciliation process. The Nationalists are likely to blame for most atrocities, but of course, assertions are facts when it comes to atrocities. Never have a real trial, ever.

As for your quoted person, it is not I. Fuck him.

And if Korea was a victim, we want our massive investment back. They can go back to having a single university, and all those great Korean military/bureaucrat officials that worked with us to build up the joint can be retroactively cancelled. Exhume them and shoot them a few more times to make sure.

Reconning….Oh hey, what a novel idea. At least those who know are dying out, terrified, and political assertions shall be recorded as fact.

While I agree in general, being a pathetic US vassal and being largely a one-party state, Nanking, like many other atrocities, lack much veracity as data and records from the relevant period show the population grow there, video shows only calm, local contemporary international journalists mentioning nothing, etc. Nationalists did sacrifice plenty of their own as they retreated though. Not that this matters.
Only the regularly and easily offended official Chinese fee fees matter. Not like the real people there care much. They do it like your SJWs and their tactics in manipulating y’all in the US.

the Nanjing Holocaust

Why do you want to get into the competitive victimhood sweepstakes?

Do you actually know military history? Tang Shengzhi said he’ll defend Nanjing to death then tucked his tail and ran in the last minute. Leaving behind his troops and civilians.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tang_Shengzhi#The_general_retreat_turns_into_a_rout

the Soviets obliterated them in days.

It took a massive built-up bigger than anything against Wehrmacht. Soviets still took serious casualties.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Shumshu

By denying the quality of Japanese soldiers you are implicitly denigrating the quality of Chinese soldiers. Dumbass.

They just got you to accept their moral framework.

They did?

I didn’t say it was a good thing that Whites are the least ethnocentric people on the planet. I was merely stating it as a fact and noting that our low ethnocentrism puts the lie to the claim that Earth would be a Utopia but for White people.

In any event, FTR, yes, White people must learn to take our own side or perish from the face of the Earth.

Nanking, like many other atrocities, lack much veracity as data and records from the relevant period show the population grow there, video shows only calm, local contemporary international journalists mentioning nothing, etc. Nationalists did sacrifice plenty of their own as they retreated though.

Agreed. I don’t want dwarves to over-apologize and go ethno-masochist like Jerrys. Japan was only able to make war in China on the part of US materiel.

Maxwell S. Stewart, a former Foreign Policy Association research staff and economist who charged that America’s Neutrality Act and its “neutrality policy” was a massive farce which only benefited Japan and that Japan did not have the capability nor could ever have invaded China without the massive amount of raw material America exported to Japan.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Sino-Japanese_War#Foreign_aid_and_support_to_China

OTOH, no one in China and rest of Asia should give a rats ass about Hiroshima Nagasaki. I thinks that’s fair.

While chauvinism is not exclusive to the whites, white chauvinism and racism are no bullshit. Theirs are just more sophisticated, and more insidious, than other’s.

This is no “trade war”. It is a war of ambitions. China’s ambition is to become a leading economic and technological power– like many Western powers have done. The West’s ambition– especially America’s ambition– is to make China have no ambitions!!!
.
‘In defending the tariffs, the Trump administration has cited China’s ambition to become a world leader in tech and innovation, detailed in the “Made in China 2025” plan.’
.
https://www.scmp.com/news/world/united-states-canada/article/2160574/us-trade-panel-hears-harsh-criticism-proposed-new
.
Ever watched Boardwalk Empire? In one scene, a white FBI agent made a comment about Blacks having “ideas”. A China that has ambitions is like a Black having ideas– Both are unacceptable to the White supremacists!

Whites are free to believe we’re the best in our own damned countries, and Chinese are free to feel the same in theirs.

So, are the Chinese free to have the “sort of hypercompetitive, status-obsessed culture” they have?! You, in fact, are saying that while the whites “are free to believe they are the best”, it is NOT free for the Chinese to believe they can be the best too– by being “hypercompetitive, status-obsessed”!!! What is this if not chauvinism/racism?!!!

The Chinese feel they have something to prove because YT hurt their feelings.

Don’t know what the “YT” that you are talking about is but the Chinese ALWAYS “feel they have something to prove” to themselves and to their families!!! So, what are you going to do about that? To make it un-free for them to do the proving???

If you did, it would merely prove that you believe it was up to YOU (a white) to decide what ambitions the Chinese could have– which is my original point that you argue against (Post 22)!!! If you did NOT, then you would be conceding that the Chinese are free to have their “sort of hypercompetitive, status-obsessed culture”– a character of the Chinese that you ridiculed in your earlier post (Post 39)! It seems that you canNOT have it both ways!!!

The following is my exchange with some Brit some years ago:

Devils Advocate_1in reply to Clint.Southward

Clint.Southwardin reply to L6QjhvJGVkJan 26th, 02:17

“The Chinese have been fed a myth that they are going to be the next superpower and the Middle Kingdom is going to be restored to its “natural” place – to its birthright.”
.
This is what I said. “are going” is the same as “will” – future tense. Regardless of the debate about how you measure the size of economies hundreds of years (or even more than a thousand years ago) with little data available, and which side one falls on that debate, I was talking about Chinese expectations for themselves and the future, and what might happen if those expectations are thwarted, and they realize that recovering from the 19th century and the great leap backward is not going to be so emphatic as they had imagined.

.
I have been watching this “feeding of a myth” thing for the past 2 decades. The “feeding” was done by Westerners. The Chinese always say that China is still a developing country, its people are still poor, its capabilities are limited, etc etc.
.
To the Chinese, there is nothing called “natural place” or “birthright”. The Chinese believe that whatever you want to get, you must struggle for it and it is everyone’s own responsibility to make it to the very top. Ditto for countries.

This is a very destabilizing ideology– For it not only means that the Chinese might one day challenge YOUR “modern world” which was made by YOUR “English speaking people”, which is bad enough. This Chinese belief actually means that the Indians, Indonesians, Africans, Papua New Guineans too are entitled to put themselves at the very top of the international order– As long as they work hard enough to get themselves there. Now, that would really flush YOUR “modern world” down the toilet!!!
.
You don’t seem to understand that the “modern world” is not your “English speaking people’s” “birthright”! But then, what more can be your “expectations for yourself”?
.
Devil’s

Yes, anytime someone cheats, they make it impossible for others to compete without cheating. (Prisoner’s Dilemma) That’s why you need protective tariffs.

The your left hand is cheating your right hand. Why should I care?

You are asking me to believe that the same U.S. elite that has facilitated the rise of China is now hellbent on keeping it down for no reason other than the desire for unilateral world domination. You must admit this sounds far-fetched. You may be right, of course, but you’re not going to be able to make that case on an internet comment board. If you feel that strongly about it, you might consider writing an article for guest publication or something.

They might be the same, or different, groups of elites.

If they were different, then the earlier ones love money and latter ones love power.

If they were the same elites, then they were exploiting the poor and backward China for making themselves rich first. But when China becomes more developed and powerful, they want to put China down before it is too late.

You only need to have some common sense to work that out yourself.

So, are the Chinese free to have the “sort of hypercompetitive, status-obsessed culture” they have?!

Glad to see you admit that Chinese culture is what I say it is, and yes, they’re free to have any culture they want…in China.

And we are free to refuse to buy products from their sweatshops, aren’t we?

the Chinese ALWAYS “feel they have something to prove” to themselves and to their families!!!

Indeed. It’s dreadful. I don’t need my children to master calculus by 8th grade. I would rather they have a happy childhood.

Glad to see you admit that Chinese culture is what I say it is, and yes, they’re free to have any culture they want…in China.

And the whites are free to believe that they are the best… in Europe!

And we are free to refuse to buy products from their sweatshops, aren’t we?

China never forces the whites to buy Chinese manufactures. The whites buy them by their own choice.

Indeed. It’s dreadful. I don’t need my children to master calculus by 8th grade. I would rather they have a happy childhood.

You and your children are free to make you choice. China have never regime-changed you when you did not. And China will never do so either.

Again, are you going to make it un-free for the Chinese to do the proving??? And regime-change them if the Chinese still keep their “sort of hypercompetitive, status-obsessed culture”??? If not, what is the point of arguing about those points in the first place?

And we are free to refuse to buy products from their sweatshops, aren’t we?

Most US multinationals have been sourcing from sweatshops located in Mexico, Vietnam, Indonesia, Bangladesh, Ethiopia and other developing countries because labor costs in China have risen 3x over the past ten years. The exports of US goods made in China now account for only 2% of China’s GDP which will go down further as the ‘outsourcing’ trend will likely continue to shift export-oriented low-cost manufacturing industries from China to other lower-cost developing countries. Chinese companies hardly sell their products to the US market as it is US multinationals who had ‘outsourced’ the manufacturing of US products to China in the past which is now moving out of China to other lower-cost developing countries.

So what’s your problem with China?

Indians, Indonesians, Africans, Papua New Guineans too are entitled to put themselves at the very top of the international order

Top of the international order? They all have rights in the UN. What is unfair is that only 5 countries have VETO powers because of WW2 which is long gone and this system is archaic and discriminatory. India with 1/6th of humanity has no VETO rights in the UN.

Most US multinationals have been sourcing from sweatshops located in Mexico, Vietnam, Indonesia, Bangladesh, Ethiopia and other developing countries because labor costs in China have risen 3x over the past ten years.

I’ll be damned if everything I buy doesn’t still say “Made in China” on it, so I’ll believe my lyin’ eyes, thank you very much.

As for Ethiopia and Bangladesh, they will never become superpowers, so they are not a threat. That said, I don’t want their products dumped on U.S. markets either.

If they were the same elites, then they were exploiting the poor and backward China for making themselves rich first. But when China becomes more developed and powerful, they want to put China down before it is too late.

They’re definitely the same elites, and no, it is definitely not common sense to suppose that, after having given China the opportunity to better itself, they now want to “put China down.” That is absurd. As I said, if you can prove this bizarre claim, write an article.

Of course, you’ll have to explain what you mean by “before it’s too late”? Too late for what? Too late to prevent them from achieving world domination? You told us they’re not interested in world domination.

Inquiring minds would also like to know why these elites would want to beat ’em rather than just join ’em. Surely you don’t think they harbor some sort of ingroup racial preference? It is Ordinary White people who have reason to fear China, not the ruling elites.

China never forces the whites to buy Chinese manufactures. The whites buy them by their own choice.

In other words, China takes advantage of Whites’ individualism and low ethnocentrism to destroy the competition. I suppose that’s understandable. It is also our right and duty to call attention to the fact that that is what is happening and put a stop to it.

That is not “aggression,” putting China down,” or anything else other than simple self-assertion. Whites are entitled to put our own interests first.

You and your children are free to make you choice.

Stop fibbing. As long as my White children are forced to compete with Asians, citizen or foreign, for seats in our own damned universities, built by and for Whites, we are not in fact free to choose. Asian ways are imposed on us, like it or not, and childhood gets lost in the race to the bottom.

China have never regime-changed you when you did not. And China will never do so either.

When you can buy politicians for relative pocket change, regime change is unnecessary.

Again, are you going to make it un-free for the Chinese to do the proving??? And regime-change them if the Chinese still keep their “sort of hypercompetitive, status-obsessed culture”??? If not, what is the point of arguing about those points in the first place?

I’m not arguing. I’m telling you I don’t want Asians imposing their ways on us, directly or indirectly, by force of arms or competition. WTF don’t you understand about this?

You are asking me to believe that the same U.S. elite that has facilitated the rise of China is now hellbent on keeping it down for no reason other than the desire for unilateral world domination. You must admit this sounds far-fetched.

Not so fast. Members of nations have differing priorities when engaging with other cultures. Clearly, Western corporations had, and have, every incentive to trade with China – and trade brings tech and development.

How can it not? The mere exposure of one culture to another will automatically make the less-advanced one aspire to better things, to eventually equal the richer one. China did this with a vengeance, with discipline and a long-term plan.

Is there anything wrong with having something to prove, and working long and hard to do so? Our societies in the West, our competitive industrialization is founded on this very principle, this human impulse. Why deny such a right to others – for example, to the Chinese?

Another segment of the American elite values geopolitical power more than economic profit. They are aghast that their core constituency, THE VERY CORE of their domestic power base (NO, not the citizenry, I mean of course the industrial and technological enterprises, and by extension the employees of said corporations – meaning essentially EVERYONE) wants to do business with a foreign power.

So, they take steps to make business relations with that nation unattractive for their own citizens, to at least slow down that other nation’s development. I am sure that such ruthless and hard-nosed geopolitical operators ultimately realize the futility of their plans. But, “they take what they can get.”

Every little bit they can do to impede the Chinese, they will do. It may be inevitable, but at least they can make China’s rise difficult.

“Why do you want to get into the competitive victimhood sweepstakes?”

Wait until your father is beheaded and your daughter is raped before throwing out your counsel to others. If you are too lazy or stupid to research the “veracity as data” of the Chinese side, at least keep your fucking mouth out supporting the criminal Japanese “records of population grow” or “calm video shows”.

Don’t kid yourself: no China-Japan bromance is possible until depraved Jap and half Jap all die off and house niggers all sent to “medical research” unit 731.

Why deny such a right to others – for example, to the Chinese?

Because it is treason to allow a foreign power to deindustrialize your country. If the Chinese impose tariffs on goods from the aforementioned shitholes like Ethiopia and Bangladesh to prevent the hollowing out of theor economy, they are well within theor rights to do so. Do you disagree?

Another segment of the American elite values geopolitical power more than economic profit. They are aghast that their core constituency, THE VERY CORE of their domestic power base (NO, not the citizenry, I mean of course the industrial and technological enterprises, and by extension the employees of said corporations – meaning essentially EVERYONE) wants to do business with a foreign power.

Evidently, the “the segment of the American elite” that values geopolitical power doesn’t actually have any power.

Every little bit they can do to impede the Chinese, they will do. It may be inevitable, but at least they can make China’s rise difficult.

In which case, this is a pointless conversation.

I’ll tell you what. Why don’t you give me one example of something you think has been done to China that illustrates your point. Then we can debate that. I suspect that would be a great deal more fruitful.

Top of the international order? They all have rights in the UN. What is unfair is that only 5 countries have VETO powers because of WW2 which is long gone and this system is archaic and discriminatory. India with 1/6th of humanity has no VETO rights in the UN.

How about starting a different organization with only India and China having veto power– instead of joining the so-called Quad, in which India only has the power to follow other people’s agenda??? India and China could then invite Russia in and to have veto power too!

Take a look at the videos of Kishore Mahbubani’s on Youtube– “The past 2 hundred years …. was a historic aberration…”. One of the videos is this one:

Video Link

If India wants veto power, it must work hard to gain it!!!

They’re definitely the same elites, and no, it is definitely not common sense to suppose that, after having given China the opportunity to better itself, they now want to “put China down.”

Deng Xiaoping decided to reform in order to give China the opportunity to better itself. If any murrikan company decided NOT to move into China like its competitors did, it would have bankrupted itself in no time.

YOU are one of those who have damned the murrikan manufacturing industry by buying from “Made in China” instead of “Made in Murrika”. This what you said (Post 63):

I’ll be damned if everything I buy doesn’t still say “Made in China” on it, so I’ll believe my lyin’ eyes, thank you very much.

Too late for what?

Too late! Too late for not being stopped from dominating the world in a unipolar manner:

… It is also consistent with the arguments of the most honest kind of “China hawk,” who argues that the real problem with Beijing is not that it wants to dominate the world, but that it might stop the U.S. from doing so in a unipolar manner.

https://www.globalresearch.ca/china-real-threat-america-ruling-ideology/5733887

Also, watch the Mearsheimer video.

Inquiring minds would also like to know why these elites would want to beat ’em rather than just join ’em. Surely you don’t think they harbor some sort of ingroup racial preference? It is Ordinary White people who have reason to fear China, not the ruling elites.

“Ordinary White people” “have reason to fear” other white people like YOU– because you buy “everything” that still says “Made in China”!

“Inquiring minds” tell me that, if you were born a century and a half ago, you would have been born a Chinese– You share the SAME mentality with them. What goes around comes around!

You need a psychiatrist to inquire into your own mind!!!

In other words, China takes advantage of Whites’ individualism and low ethnocentrism to destroy the competition. I suppose that’s understandable. It is also our right and duty to call attention to the fact that that is what is happening and put a stop to it.

I am not stopping you exercising your rights. You have the right NOT to buy, and not to import, “Made in China” too. Why don’t you stop doing that? Check your own post (Post 63).

That is not “aggression,” putting China down,” or anything else other than simple self-assertion. Whites are entitled to put our own interests first.

What China has been doing over the past decades is “simple self-assertion” too. Yet the white propaganda industry non-stop portrays China as being “aggressive”! Do the whites ever take a look at themselves in a mirror?

Stop fibbing. As long as my White children are forced to compete with Asians, citizen or foreign, for seats in our own damned universities, built by and for Whites, we are not in fact free to choose. Asian ways are imposed on us, like it or not, and childhood gets lost in the race to the bottom.

You ARE free to choose by NOT admitting these Asian students, but then your universities can’t afford to loose the tuition fee that they bring along…

When you can buy politicians for relative pocket change, regime change is unnecessary.

We can also buy YOU with cheap, and good quality, “Made in China”. Why should you be surprised at all???

I’m not arguing. I’m telling you I don’t want Asians imposing their ways on us, directly or indirectly, by force of arms or competition. WTF don’t you understand about this?

Thief calling “thief”. It is murrika that has been doing regime-changes and forcing demoncrazy on other countries around the world.

If you “don’t want Asians imposing their ways on us, directly or indirectly”, tell the “Indians” whom the whites have impose themselves on– in the “Indians’ ” own land!!! And tell the African slaves why they deserved to live the way of slaves imposed on by the whites.

Buy yourself a “Make in China” mirror!

I’ll be damned if everything I buy doesn’t still say “Made in China” on it, so I’ll believe my lyin’ eyes, thank you very much.

The following graph shows the factory locations producing Nike shoes worldwide as of 2015:

Note that Nike’s sales in China account 12% of its worldwide sales while Nike’s production in China account for 26% of its worldwide workers as of 2015. Those figures should be much less today with its remaining production in China serving mostly the Chinese market.

Any more questions?

If India wants veto power, it must work hard to gain it!!!

What hard work did the 5 countries do? Win a war 70 years ago?

How about starting a different organization with only India and China having veto

Good idea Deep Thought. Better yet, let no country have VETO powers. Simple.

What hard work did the 5 countries do? Win a war 70 years ago?

The USSR did the most hard work. The US of A worked hard on the Bomb and got 3. Chiang’s wife worked hard to con favours out of FDR (or Truman, I can’t remember) because he/she was such a crook. The once-great Britain worked hard to keep India as its most prized colony– I think. France? I don’t know– better ask De Gaulle.

Good idea Deep Thought. Better yet, let no country have VETO powers. Simple.

Can you remind me how that veto power in the UN came about? Maybe, real-life politics is never simple?

An example of China working hard enough and got its OWN veto power:

https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy-defence/article/1829342/china-have-30-cent-stake-veto-power-under-aiib-deal

Simple… The nutcase US elites wanted China on the US side against the USSR…. They never expected China to actually get powerful… They expected China to remain cheap labor. China had other ideas – including making friends with Russia when the USSR broke up.

Nah-you’re full Imperial Jap, no doubt about it.

Much of the human garbage that poses as the ‘elites’ in Austfailia are all the way with the USA because they are RACISTS, who despise non-Whites, non-Anglos, the local Indigenous, and, above all else, those ‘stinking Chinks’ who have forgotten their place. This country will cease to exist, destroyed by these thugs, within a few decades.

It is funny how you guys talk of inequality but want to keep an elite club when your country is part of it. Slimeball behaviour. I have been observing. Some stupid war 70 years ago should not decide the power balance in the UN today.

As far as the USSR, without British Commonwealth food supplies, the Soviets would have folded before the Axis forces however brave the Soviets fought. Also during WW2, Bengal had turned into a frontier camp against the Japanese Empire. Bengal and Assam were very important for the supply of goods by the Allies to China by the Stilwell road. The large presence of Allied troops (including 200000 Chinese troops being trained in India) played a part int he Bengal famine where 2 million perished. Hope China and the World remembers this contribution of India.
Anyways, some war 70 years ago does not in any way justify an unequal system in the UN today when the geopolitical system has changed. It is best that these archaic, snotty and unequal VETO powers be scrapped. So that Thailand would have the same right as the USA, Nigeria the same rights as China, India the same rights as France, Argentina the same rights as Russia, Indonesia the same rights as the UK.

They never expected China to actually get powerful… They expected China to remain cheap labor.

From ADRIEL KASONTA:

“The idea is to knock out China as an economic rival, to ‘colonize’ China and make Chinese industry work for us. Racism and xenophobia is not the source of the problem – but a useful tool to demonize China,” Professor Alfred Maurice de Zayas, a former UN consultant, said during an interview this writer conducted for Asia Times in May.

The white supremacist identity, which gave birth to the so-called “New World,” appears to be the US modus operandi not only in its internal dealings with non-Caucasian inhabitants (including Asian-Americans), but also external conduct toward countries like the Middle Kingdom.

Failure to recognize this reality by China, or to think that the desire to destabilize the country is limited only to President Donald Trump’s administration, may be the beginning of the end of the only superpower that can prevent the US from turning rest of the world into one big reservation for the indigenous nations around the globe.

https://asiatimes.com/2020/07/china-needs-realism-not-wishful-thinking-on-us/

re: Dr. Mahatir’s words

We have been trading with China for over 1000 years and they never tried to conquer us. The Portuguese came to trade and colonized us.

How many Portuguese are there in Malaysia today and what fraction of the economy do they own? And how many Chinese are there in Malaysia and what fraction of the economy do they own?

and, above all else, those ‘stinking Chinks’ who have forgotten their place.

Posted on The Economist forum a long time ago:

ý@ýýýýH in reply to sikko6

sikko6 in reply to ashbird Sep 19th, 06:13

Chinese are very good at copying. China will copy what America did.

And then America will say, “Do as I say, NOT as I do!” but China won’t listen because the Chinese, unlike some other non-whites, have a habit of not knowing their place in front of the whites. The whites and honourary whites then proceed to hate the Chinese for not knowing their place…. ;-D, ;-D, ;-D

Tom Clancy should start writing future history along that line.

;-D, ;-D, ;-D…

Devil’s

We’re not obligated to reduce our standard of living for the benefit of others.

So which are you promoting: a high standard of living based on a large environmental footprint or a simple life based on a small environmental footprint? There is much hypocrisy in the West with its promotion of environmental causes and complaining about the impacts on the environment of others’ development as data d dan quoted shows. He could have also shown the per capita waste production by Westerners as opposed to Nigerians, Indians, etc. which actually indicates that Westerners are, in reality, far filthier (generate far more waste) despite what a cursory uninformed observation may reveal.

I try to support Rosie, but she refuses to admit that her feminist sisters shit on heterosexual unions that resulted in nuclear families. Then, she married and created a nuclear family. But still she continues to shit on the male culture that wants to create nuclear families even as SHE basks in the glow and comfort of HER nuclear family. This is why feminists are so fucked in the head. Like I’ve said many times, as the feminists beat you, THEY cry out in pain. It’s a jewish thing. They do it even as their own daughters are murdered by orcs. Rosie is a lost cause. She’s conflicted. She took the marriage-way out, but continues to take the feminist route of shitting on the same exact sort of men that married HER. Sorry Rosie, THAT is exactly what you did. Rosie your husband and kids must be proud. Marry, then hate the culture of men that gave you your comfort. Women like that are ingrates and slugs. Totally worthless slugs and slags that suck off of the men they married.They take and take from men they hate and complain they had to take it. Is that fucked or what? THIS is what these women are. No better than the blacks that are parasitic reptiles.

Nanking, like many other atrocities, lack much veracity

You can have veracity only if you have BRUTE FORCE– the only thing the japs understand and accept– to back it up!!! The Soviet Russians had no problem getting their veracity because they had the power to RAPED their way right into Berlin.

In the Pacific Front, however, veracity was buried by the murrikans because the japs (and the Germans) were very useful tools in the latter’s world domination project:

In 1945-46, representatives of the United States government made similar discoveries in both Germany and Japan, unearthing evidence of unethical experiments on human beings that could be viewed as war crimes. The outcomes in the two defeated nations, however, were strikingly different. In Germany, the U.S., influenced by the Canadian physician John Thompson, played a key role in bringing Nazi physicians to trial and publicizing their misdeeds. In Japan, the U.S. played an equally key role in concealing information about the biological warfare experiments and securing immunity from prosecution for the perpetrators. The greater force of appeals to national security and wartime exigency help to explain these different outcomes.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4487829/

“The greater force” was, in fact, RACE. Race was the biggest factor that “explained these different outcomes”. murrika had a much greater “security and wartime exigency” in Europe with respect to the Soviet Union, as it had in Asia with respect to China– simply because the USSR was far, far more powerful than China was. Since the Soviets had the required BRUTE FORCE to back themselves up, they got their justice with The Rape of Berlin, while the Chinese got none.

Kirk Spitzer is being dishonest, or being racist! Spitzer clearly is not a Chinese or a Korean. So, to him “gooks” don’t count.

China and other Asians countries have to wait for the 2nd session of the pacific War to get their justice!

Shut up yourself Rosie. Spare us the queer links. Even as feminists at-large mocked gays and trannies they used them as bludgeons to attack heterosexual men to gain power. White heterosexual men didn’t use homos to undermine men. FEMINIST women with husbands and children, women JUST LIKE YOU, privileged feminists did that. I worked at N.O.W. DC for two decades and saw the whole thing play out. Your fertilizer grows no flowers. We’re wise. You took the full flower of the patriarchy for yourself and bitch about it every single step of the way. I’ve known (all us men have, by the way) hundreds of broads just like you. I’m wise, don’t try to bullshit me. You suck off the patriarchy and bitch about it all along the way. And you fucking know it. Go ahead, enjoy the patriarchy. It’s your salvation. Without the patriarchy, you’d be a trailer-dweller. Obviously.

WTF is a “feeling thermometer”? The things they come up with! I bet it’s some rubbish cooked up by idiot western academics. I’m sure you can’t buy that device as “made in China” on Alibaba.

How many Portuguese are there in Malaysia today and what fraction of the economy do they own? And how many Chinese are there in Malaysia and what fraction of the economy do they own?

Mahathir is correct because he knows the history of Asia: China never colonized the whole of Asia unlike the West. Saying that Chinese immigrants represent ‘China’ implies that Indian immigrants represent India. Both were recruited by the British to settle Malaysia. Blame the British Empire — not China or India — for colonizing Malaysia.

How many Portuguese are there in Malaysia today and what fraction of the economy do they own? And how many Chinese are there in Malaysia and what fraction of the economy do they own?

Have you checked, “in Malaysia today”, who own, and run, the largest “fraction of the economy” and therefore are supplying the vitality that keeps the Malaysian economy going? And who are those dominating the politics there and are, therefore, feeding off the fraction whose contribution is keeping the economy prospering?

So, who is “colonising” whom in Malaysia today?

It is funny how you guys talk of inequality but want to keep an elite club when your country is part of it. Slimeball behaviour. I have been observing. Some stupid war 70 years ago should not decide the power balance in the UN today.

1) I certainly will not challenge your view on this but are you sure Indians would be any different if India was already a member of the UNSC? Last time I heard, it was that India wanted to become a member of the elite UNSC– rather than the abolition of the UNSC, which would make every UN member truly equal!!

2) The way the UN is certainly makes some members elite and “more equal”. But what are you going to do about it– apart from just talking about wanting an equitable sharing of power?

Since the UN is not going to make that change for you, or for India, the alternative is to overthrow it and start something new yourself. That was what Mao did to Chiang KS when the latter was not going to make changes for the CCP.

As far as the USSR, without British Commonwealth food supplies, the Soviets would have folded before the Axis forces however brave the Soviets fought.

3) I do not know every detail about WWII but I will take your words for it. But that still cannot erase the enormous Soviet contribution in the defeat of Nazi Germany:

in Winston Churchill’s words “tore the guts out of the Nazi war machine”.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/2718529.stm

So that Thailand would have the same right as the USA, Nigeria the same rights as China, India the same rights as France, Argentina the same rights as Russia, Indonesia the same rights as the UK.

4) Let us assume that you had created a new UN in which “Thailand would have the same right as the USA, Nigeria the same rights as China, India the same rights as France, Argentina the same rights as Russia, Indonesia the same rights as the UK.”

How does a Thailand, that has some 70 million people, having the SAME voting rights as the US (330 million) or China (1.4 billion) or India (almost 1.4 billion) make the arrangement an equitable one?

WTF is a “feeling thermometer”?

Rosie also said,

WTF don’t you understand…?

This (female?) orangutan has a ‘WTF “feeling thermometer”’ in its hand:

Although only 24.6 % of the population, the Chinese minority overwhelmingly dominates commerce, controlling around 70 % of national income. They also dominate the real-estate sector with round 75 % of office blocks, hotels and business premises in the hands of Chinese. Most of these Chinese arrived as immigrants in the 19th and 20th Century. So if the bumiputera (sons of the soil) Malays discriminate against them in government jobs and profit from the taxes the entrepreneurial Chinese pay it is only so as to preserve their own rule over their own country. Some Chinese complain about this discrimination but most are happy with the arrangement.

Here’s a graph showing the top six countries where Nike’s factories are located (as of 2017):

https://www.ft.com/__origami/service/image/v2/images/raw/http%3A%2F%2Fcom.ft.imagepublish.prod.s3.amazonaws.com%2F0ef7d4d8-b4f4-11e7-aa26-bb002965bce8?dpr=1&fit=scale-down&quality=highest&source=next&width=700

Vietnam’s workforce is 230K and Indonesia’s workforce is 130K while China’s workforce is roughly 80K. The other three has a combined workforce of around 40K, giving a total workforce of (230+130+80+40) = 480K. Note that half of China’s production serves the Chinese market which means that only one half or 40K of its workforce serves the global market. Excluding those 40K serving the Chinese market, the total workforce of the top six countries serving the global market is 440K, of which 40K is in China which is 9% of the total.

Note that those figures are for 2017 BEFORE Trump’s trade war which should have reduced China’s share of the total workforce of Nike’s factories producing for the global market to the range of a few percent, mostly serving the East Asian market outside China.

One of these days, I doubt if you can walk into a Nike store in the USA and buy a Nike shoe made in China as they will most likely be made in Vietnam, Indonesia or Mexico.

Any more questions?

She’s conflicted. She took the marriage-way out,

Hold on, did you just write; “the marriage way out?” LOL.

I certainly will not challenge your view on this but are you sure Indians would be any different if India was already a member of the UNSC?

India or USA or China, there should be no elite UNSC. It is elitist snob bullshit. There should be no permanent member.

cannot erase the enormous Soviet contribution in the defeat of Nazi Germany

Yes that is true. No doubt.

How does a Thailand, that has some 70 million people, having the SAME voting rights as the US (330 million)

Populations keep on changing, Nigeria will have 700 million people one day. If importance is given on population, nations will get into a rat race for higher population which will be detrimental to the planet and cause massive unemployment as automation and robotics sets in. Let all nations have equal rights and no posh snob VETO group in the UN.

Ok, I was sloppy there. Let’s break this down.

lack much veracity as data and records from the relevant period show the population grow there,

This is debated. But brazen for the half-Dwarve to claim as fact.

video shows only calm, local contemporary international journalists mentioning nothing, etc.

This is a flat out lie by the shameless half-dwarve. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minnie_Vautrin

Nationalists did sacrifice plenty of their own as they retreated though.

There is truth in this unfortunately.

Tens of thousand of KMT soldiers surrendered at Nanjing alone. Whereas dwarves did not surrendered as a unit in anywhere in WW2.

This should be acknowledged and not as an insult the honor of the Chinese soldier, who continued to fight on heroically in Xuzhou, Tai’erzhuang, Wuhan, Changsha, Changde, and Burma. But that dwarves, with their bushido ethos, did outperform Chinese troops frequently, even accounting for equipment and materiel differences. In rare occasions when dwarves were on the defense and cornered (Battle of Tengzhong, Burma 腾冲战役), they simply fought to the last bullet and last man as they did at Iwo Jima and Saipan.

It should be also noted that dwarves committed half a million troops at Operation Ichi-Go 一号作戦, for Battle of Okinawa, 80 thousand.

until depraved Jap and half Jap all die off and house niggers all sent to “medical research” unit 731.

You are being hyperbolic but I agree in principle. Dwarves only stopped using the term shinajin until the Chinese did what they couldn’t, fight the Americans to a draw at any cost, in Korea. They only respect strength.

But I’d say a do-over of Imjin War, and a reversal of Naval Battle of Yalu River.

they got their justice with The Rape of Berlin, while the Chinese got none.

The Chinese had the power to take vengeance on dwarves. By doing the equivalent of this—

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flight_and_expulsion_of_Germans_(1944%E2%80%931950)

But did not.

https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E4%BB%A5%E5%BE%B7%E5%A0%B1%E6%80%A8_(%E8%94%A3%E4%B8%AD%E6%AD%A3)

Chiang’s post WWII policies to Japan, 以德报怨 “To repay grievance with magnanimity“

1. Allow 2 million Japanese soldiers and civilians peacefully repatriate
2. Prevent Japan from becoming partitioned like Germany
3. Preservation of Imperial Institution
4. Renounce claims for reparations

To be fair, dwarve military in China did not have the equivalent of Generalplan Ost and Hungerplan.

Dwarves repaid the KMT in the Chinese Civil War by fighting to death at Taiyuan Campaign against CCP Commies.
https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%B1%B1%E8%A5%BF%E6%AE%8B%E7%95%99%E6%97%A5%E6%9C%AC%E5%86%9B%E9%98%9F

but most are happy with the arrangement.

Aren’t the bumiputera happy with the arrangement too? Mahathir, who is a bumiputera, seems to be so.

It seems that the worst off are the Indian Malays. Like the Chinese Malays, they contribute much to the Malaysia’s economy but do not receive as much recognition as the ethnic Chinese do.

You still don’t get it, do you? Haiti has a majority Black population who are descendants of African slaves. Mauritius has a majority Indian population who are descendants Indian coolies. Does that imply that African countries and India ‘colonized’ Haiti and Mauritius, respectively?

If importance is given on population, nations will get into a rat race for higher population…

That is another way of admitting that all nations want to become snob elite members. How does that make them different from the P5 who became snob elite members by other means?

India or USA or China, there should be no elite UNSC. It is elitist snob bullshit. There should be no permanent member.

My question remains: How are you going to achieve your dream?

I have actually thought of a way:

All non-P5 members of the UN just leave the UN and form their own alternative organization without snob elite members called the “UN – 5” where “-” is “minus”.

That would leave 5 members in the UN, ALL of whom are snob elite members, which means that NONE of them can be a snob elite member.

Not a single nation can then be a snob elite member then. Dream achieved!!!

The Indians, mostly Tamils from Ceylon, were brought to Malaysia by the British to work as indentured labourers. I don’t think the Chinese were brought as coolies and most came as immigrants. It isn’t classical colonialism but when a foreign minority owns so much of the wealth of a nation what is it? This could well happen to many white countries in the future, and in a way it already has with the Jews being that privileged minority, and in fact more privileged than the Malaysian Chinese as Jews are not discriminated against in government posts, education, or some investment schemes as the Chinese in Malaysia.

Anglin furiously pegs himself to a picture of President Xi; meanwhile CCP official propaganda mouthpiece argues that Anglo-Saxons are genetically evil.

Not “whiteness” or some other cultural construct, but in the DNA.

Brutality against indigenous people embedded in Anglo-Saxons’ DNA

https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202106/1227315.shtml

At least withinn CRT it is possible for white people to not be evil.

But you claimed China ‘colonized’ Malaysia which is patently false. As Mahathir correctly pointed out, China never ‘colonized’ the rest of Asia, unlike the West. So what if Chinese-Malaysians play a significant role in the Malaysian economy? You’re presuming that they represent China which is your false premise.

All I’m saying is that they are outsiders who settled in Malaysia to take advantage of the local conditions and the nature of the local population to enrich themselves. Much like the Jews and now other immigrants in the West. Whether that is beneficial for the local “sons of the soil” bumiputras is another question. The Chinese seem to think so as do some of the Malays but I’m not sure all the indigenous locals would agree.

The Tamil Indians would happily go back to Sri Lanka if the Queen of England would compensate them 1 million pounds each for the British having relocated their ancestors to Malaysia, or so most of them say and even rioted in front of the British High Commission in Kuala Lumpur for these demands a while back.

Geez, next thing you’ll say is that African slaves and Indian coolies took advantage of the local conditions by taking over Haiti and Mauritius, respectively. Chinese coolies were imported to British Malaya (or Straits Settlements) for one and only one reason: to exploit THEM under brutal conditions in the tin mines, rubber plantations and opium trade of British Malaya. The Datus and Sultans protected the native Malays from colonial exploitation which forced the British to import Chinese coolies from China, which was allowed by the Qing Dynasty as part of the concessions granted to the British after the Opium Wars.

You’re throwing this strawman — Chinese dominance of Malaysian economy — to promote your thesis that CHINA — not ENGLAND — somehow ‘colonized’ Malaysia. Chinese immigrants to British Malaya was made possible by British colonization of Malaya, which depended upon Chinese coolies imported from China. Before the Opium Wars, the Qing Dynasty forbade emigration of Chinese subjects which was finally allowed as a concession to the British after the Opium Wars.

Mahathir is correct — China never ‘colonized’ the rest of Asia — notwithstanding the migration of Chinese immigrants to Southeast Asia who were recruited and exploited by the Western Powers which did ‘colonize’ Asia.

Well what about Thailand, Cambodia, Vietnam, Laos, Philippines, Indonesia? No British were there and still plenty of Chinese there doing much the same as in Malaysia.

The French colonized Indochina which includes Cambodia, Vietnam and Laos; the Spanish and Americans colonized the Philippines while the Dutch colonized Indonesia. Note that during the Qing Dynasty, Chinese emigration was illegal but the Western Powers recruited Chinese immigrants anyway to act as their ‘middle-man’ between Europeans and the native Southeast Asians. There were a smaller number of Spaniards who settled in the Philippines as well as Europeans in the rest of Southeast Asia. But the two biggest groups of immigrants who were recruited by the Western Powers were the Chinese and Indians in Southeast Asia. Spain transported Chinese coolies to as far away as Cuba and Peru while Britain imported Indian coolies to as far away as Mauritius, Trinidad and Tobago, Fiji, etc. The Americans recruited Chinese coolies to build the railroad in California as well as Japanese farmworkers in Hawaii.

My original post had to do with your thesis that China somehow ‘colonized’ Southeast Asia due to the presence of Chinese immigrants (and their descendants). That is false as Mahathir noted that China NEVER ‘colonized’ Southeast Asia, unlike the West.

Global Times is running full steam with that along with George Floyd. If you must know some of the most hardcore anti-US pundits have US green cards,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sima_Nan#Incidents

I agree that its a lot of BS but why do you assume its about white people and not Anglo Five Eye butt pirates? Leave aside Mongols (oops Russia), PRC is trying to peel off Jerrys and Les Froggies, both of whom are (rightly) concerned that Murica will cut a side deal with Chicom and leave them in the lurch.
https://www.reuters.com/world/china/chinas-xi-holds-video-call-with-counterparts-germany-france-state-media-2021-07-05/

I agree that its a lot of BS but why do you assume its about white people

The CCP mouthpiece has literally just published a headline stating that Anglo-Saxons are genetically evil because of what happened to the natives and black people.

It couldn’t be clearer.

It isn’t like a white American can wave away this ridiculous blood libel just by saying that their heritage is German or French.

Its just a kabuki theatre man, how do you think the average or elite Chinese really feel about Anglo culture?

Hu Xijin (simplified Chinese: 胡锡进; traditional Chinese: 胡錫進; pinyin: Hú Xījìn; born 1960) is a Chinese journalist and the editor-in-chief of the Global Times, a state-owned tabloid

In October 2020, Apple Daily reported that Hu’s son had emigrated to Canada, and that he was mocked for it by fellow news reporters

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hu_Xijin

Chief reporter and opinion writer of Global Times/Watch Hong Kong affairs, Asian security and Chinese diplomacy/Cardiff University
@cardiffuni alumi

https://twitter.com/WenwenWang1127

“Kabuki” or not, it is still a substantially more extreme blood libel on white people than you would get in even the most absurd parts of academia, and this is a Chinese government mouthpiece.

That is astonishing. Imagine if the Washington Post ran a front page declaring that Chinese people are evil, in their genes.

Would anyone’s first reaction be to go, “so what, it is just Kabuki, man”. I am not hysterical over it, and it doesn’t mean that they’re going to attempt genocide or what have you, but it is the most extreme race hate that I have seen in a major publication in my lifetime. This is significant.

The Man Behind China’s Aggressive New Voice

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/07/magazine/china-diplomacy-twitter-zhao-lijian.html

Anglos are just perceived as tricksters, Eternal Anglo…you should see what they say about dwarves, half of Chinese internet wants to nuke Japan right now

There’s a cute blonde with huge juggs from Germany doing pro-China propaganda on twitter, Navina Heyden

Video Link

…may be some British girl with received pronunciation accent would also to get in on that, that will definitely help perceptions

Considering that the loudest voices screeching the entirely false accusations of ‘genocide’ in Xinjiang are the ‘Five Eyes’ Anglo regimes, ALL guilty of genocide against their Indigenous or in Imperial devastations (New Zealand the least guilty)and responsible for hundreds of millions of premature deaths and huge destruction of other cultures, there must be some reason for this unparalleled Evil. Genetic influences may be at work, but personal and group pathopsychology and the malign influence of Judaic/Old Testament glorification of genocide appear more likely to be pre-eminent.

Fair dinkum. Aint nobody saying he was fake victorian.

But the tweet, posted by a diplomat named Zhao Lijian, represented a different kind of aggression. “Shocked by murder of Afghan civilians & prisoners by Australian soldiers,” he wrote. “We strongly condemn such acts, & call for holding them accountable.” Attached was a digital illustration of an Australian soldier restraining an Afghan child with a large Australian flag while preparing to slit the boy’s throat. “Don’t be afraid,” the caption read, “we are coming to bring you peace!” When the tweet appeared online that morning, there were audible gasps in Australia’s Parliament House.

Zhao is only telling the truth to the world. Why should the Austra-liars feel offended?

To Palmer, a white soldier slitting a boy’s throat is not aggression but a Chinese condemning a whiteman slitting a boy’s throat is an act of “aggression”!!! This shows how maniacally twisted the mind of this white Palmer guy is.

Yes, Chinese society, locked into history’s most extreme materialism, is going to be incubating some absolutely bizarre ideologies and political demons. “Nuke Japan now”, “eternal Anglo”; it makes your typical progressive look like David Hume.

I am sure Chinese society will work itself out, but the ride is going to be even wilder than that playing out in the West.

As for your video, she hasn’t learned to breathe properly yet. What is up with that?

Mahathir’s comparison doesn’t make sense. Portuguese rule was limited to Malacca and lasted 130 years. Today the mixed-race Kristang community is about 0.12% of Malaysia’s population (almost all of the Portuguese-origin residents fled when Malacca fell to the Dutch) and is mostly poor fishermen. Chinese traders operated in the Malay peninsula centuries before the Portuguese arrived and have been a constant presence. Today they’re 23.2% of the Malaysian population, and the average Chinese is richer than the average Malay.

You can only be so progressive when you have neighbors like Mongols, Jurchens and dwarves. The Northern Song (11CE) founding emperor Zhao Kuangyin 趙匡胤 pledged to „never physically harm intellectuals“, and his dynasty was crushed by a Jurchen calvary blitzkrieg. America and England has never had those kinds of existential invasion threats and hence can experiment with more liberal systems.

“Nuke Japan now”

It really shouldn’t be this way, hence my nom de guerre. The Chinese commentors here should be reminded that Japan and SK were the only to come to China’s assistance last year at Wuhan outbreak. Things are souring since Biden came on and goading Dwarve involvement in Taiwan. But Dwarves were betrayed by Murica when Nixon opened doors to Commie China in ’72 without giving them heads up and they are not people who forgets these things.

she hasn’t learned to breathe properly yet.

Not sure why. There’s her accent, but German can sound very soft and feminine, my favorite is Judith Rakers on Tagesschau. Am deutschen Wesen mag die Welt genesen.

Are you a young teenager?

Only the libido of one and physique to rival that of Achilles 😉

Sorry I didn’t realize you are a broad, I’ll make more genteel remarks next time…btw its actually a Han feeling up the German blonde’s huge knockers (oops last one)

I wasn’t offended. You seemed sweet. I imagined that you were either very young or got friend-zoned a lot. Not because you are “sweet” though, it is more complicated than that, and hard to describe exactly why. I can think about it.

Feminists always take the escape route of marriage if they can. Steinem did, Fonda did, they all did. Not Dworken. Too fucking ugly, which is why no one would marry her which is why she was so angry. Or maybe she was angry she was so fucking ugly. Thankfully she died before she was able to publish more horseshit.

Feminists ALWAYS marry. If they can.

The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion […] but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.”
― Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order

This is pure bullshit. Either this is fake or Huntington is an idiot.