The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewAndrew Anglin Archive
Wyrm Pope Claims Women More Important Than Men, Cunt Patrol Demands More Extremism
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
List of Bookmarks

Video Link

In the above video, speaking in some strange Mexican language I’m not familiar with, the Wyrm Pope claims: “That is why the woman is more important than the man. But it is bad when the woman wants to be a man. No, she is a woman.”

Note that he has no problem with the reverse.

In fact, he enjoys blowjobs from the reverse.

He spends more time with trannies than with his beloved immigrant swarms. He’s completely obsessed with gay sex, publicly.

He should call himself “Pope Reddit.”

This is apparently not enough for Cunt Patrol, who wants the Wyrm Pope to get even more faggoty and retarded in his weird speech.

The Guardian:

Pope Francis has been sharply criticised by one of Belgium’s Catholic universities over his stance on the role of women in society, in a strongly worded press release issued just moments after the pontiff spoke at the college.

Professors and students at UCLouvain, where the 87-year-old pontiff had made a speech on Saturday afternoon, said they wanted to express their “incomprehension and disapproval” about the pope’s views.

I concur.

Everything this twisted and satanic old boy-fucker says leaves me feeling incomprehension and disapproval – both feelings, at the same time.

UCLouvain deplores the conservative positions expressed by Pope Francis on the role of women in society,” said the statement, in extraordinary language from a Catholic university about a pope.

Francis went to the university on Saturday to celebrate its upcoming 600th anniversary as part of a weekend trip he is making to Belgium. His speech largely called for global action on climate change, but he also responded to a letter to him from students and professors that had asked about the Catholic church’s teaching on women.

Yeah, when he’s not talking about sucking cock or the glorious superiority of vagina people, he’s lecturing on global warming.

How is this guy even real?

In the letter, which was read out loud to him, the students questioned him on the Church’s historical part in entrenching female subservience, the unfair division of labour and even disproportionate female poverty.

Throughout the history of the Church, women have been made invisible,” the letter read. “What place, then, for women in the Church?

Um.

There is actually no confusion on that issue.

The Man did not stutter.

Women ruined everything and now their only purpose is to shut up – shut up – and produce offspring.

Francis replied by saying the Church was female, noting that the Italian word for it, “chiesa”, is a feminine noun.

A woman within the People of God is a daughter, a sister, a mother,” he said, adding “womanhood speaks to us of fruitful welcome, nurturing and life-giving dedication”.

Womanhood speaks of global warming hoaxes, endless wars, and rape hoaxes.

We’ve had enough of this faggotism!

He did not give any details about potential plans for reform.

The university statement called the pope’s position on women’s roles in society “deterministic and reductive”.

We are really shocked,” said Valentine Hendrix, a 22-year-old student. “He reduces us to a role of childbearer, mother, wife, everything we want to emancipate ourselves from.”

Jean-Pascal van Ypersele, a climatologist at UCLouvain university, said Francis had “failed to rise to the occasion.”

“To reply that the Church is a woman is really missing the point of the question – about the Church’s respect for women and their role in the institution and in society,” he said.

The Church is not “a woman” anymore than Jesus was an apple tree. It’s called a “metaphor.” I wouldn’t expect this cocksucker to have room in his brain for such concepts.

Pretending that “Christ is the Bridegroom and the Church is his Bride” means “the Church is a woman” is the epitome of “false teaching.”

Of course, this guy literally promotes gay anal inside the Church and says unrepentant homosexuals can receive “blessings” for eating poop.

So, we don’t really expect anything Christian from Pope Reddit.

(Republished from The Daily Stormer by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 50 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. this guy literally promotes gay anal

    Yet again anglin, good job on making that distinction.
    We don’t want people to think we’re talking about the straight kind. No…
    What a man and women stuff up each other’s butts in the privacy of the bedroom is nobody’s business.

    • Replies: @Rich
  2. Pope Reddit? More like he’s Pope Donald Trump (only moderately pro- faggots, trannies, non-Whites, chimate change hoax, etc.) and he’s being criticized by Redditors for not being extreme enough on these topics.

    This pope must be expelled from the Vatican, along with his satanic Jewish patrons. He can go promote his trannies in Israel.

  3. Dumbo says:

    This clearly shows the error of the Church (or any traditional institution, really) in trying to be “modern” or “progressive”. No matter how “modern” or “progressive” you are, these vampires will always ask for more and more. After the Pope allows for married priests and women bishops, they will be demanding transgender sex orgies in churches and open child sacrifice. You can’t compromise.

    • Agree: Rich
    • Replies: @Pythas
    , @raga10
    , @Brás Cubas
  4. @Anonymous534

    I don’t see where President Trump ties into here, transhomo faggotry, abusing children sexually, etc. – that’s all lefty interests and pursuits.

    • Replies: @Anonymous534
  5. Anonymous[511] • Disclaimer says:

    I do think that in a way women are more important than men for society. Women carry, develop a special bond with, and give birth to children and primarily raise them. She who rocks the cradle rules the world.

    The Holy Father is 87. I learned that a lot of what is reported about him, and translations of his comments, are not accurate or taken out of context or downright untruths with an agenda. Let me suggest to you to not believe everything read in the media. And really don’t believe anything that is reported in Western media when it comes to the Catholic Church and hot button social issues the left is using as a wrecking ball against Christian civilization.

  6. More correct to refer to Bergoglio as the Anti-Pope.

    • Agree: c matt, Rich
  7. The cuck faggot Christian church strikes again. When not encouraging savages to swamp the West, Christians are fucking boys up the ass, telling their sons to cut off their balls, offering up their daughters to niggers, and cucking to tyrannical mentally-ill women.

    The collapse will be here soon. It can’t come soon enough.

  8. Hate to break this to you, AA….. You may not actually be a Catholic. There is a very fine religion called Protestantism you may with to look into

    • Replies: @Lemmy Tellyuh
  9. @VergissDichGanzSchnell

    Well, I guess you have much to learn about President Trump then.

    • Replies: @Anon
  10. Haxo Angmark [AKA "chuck lowe"] says:

    I am 74 so I can remember when the nuns in Catholic school insisted and taught us, that the Pope, was INFALLIBLE. As I aged and read the REAL history of the actual popes, who were poisoning, fucking, stealing, raping, pillaging and wrecking the flora and fauna in every century, I was shocked.

    Back when I thought he was the voice and presence of God, here on earth in the Catholic Church, even in the 3rd grade I can remember thinking he would probably be a really good poker player.

    Frank “Lefty” Rosenthal has a light year more decency than most all of the popes combined and he had people killed on a regular basis.

    This Pope, is truly a “wyrm”. A devil who seeks chaos and destruction in the name of Mammon.

  11. Anon[224] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous534

    Can you elaborate please?

  12. anonymous[229] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous

    Women murder their children by the millions in the womb, are the majority of child abusers, and develop such a powerful bond with their sons that they pressure them to transition or teach them to serve women (you should be teaching your child to serve no one). If women had such a special bond with children, they would do a much better job of protecting them. I suspect you’re either a jew or a female.

  13. @Haxo Angmark

    The nuns were obviously mistaken. The pope is not infallible per se. He is, according to doctrine, ONLY infallible when he speaks ex cathedra. The last time that happened was in 1950 I believe. If you are a devout catholic, you can still disagree with the pope and not come in conflict with doctrine.

    • Agree: Renard
    • Replies: @Linus
  14. He’s got a point that women are more important than men – in that men are more expendable.

    https://web.archive.org/web/20110107122131/http://denisdutton.com/baumeister.htm

    Today’s human population is descended from twice as many women as men.

    I think this difference is the single most underappreciated fact about gender. To get that kind of difference, you had to have something like, throughout the entire history of the human race, maybe 80% of women but only 40% of men reproduced.

    Right now our field is having a lively debate about how much behavior can be explained by evolutionary theory. But if evolution explains anything at all, it explains things related to reproduction, because reproduction is at the heart of natural selection. Basically, the traits that were most effective for reproduction would be at the center of evolutionary psychology. It would be shocking if these vastly different reproductive odds for men and women failed to produce some personality differences.

    For women throughout history (and prehistory), the odds of reproducing have been pretty good. Later in this talk we will ponder things like, why was it so rare for a hundred women to get together and build a ship and sail off to explore unknown regions, whereas men have fairly regularly done such things? But taking chances like that would be stupid, from the perspective of a biological organism seeking to reproduce. They might drown or be killed by savages or catch a disease. For women, the optimal thing to do is go along with the crowd, be nice, play it safe. The odds are good that men will come along and offer sex and you’ll be able to have babies. All that matters is choosing the best offer. We’re descended from women who played it safe.

    For men, the outlook was radically different. If you go along with the crowd and play it safe, the odds are you won’t have children. Most men who ever lived did not have descendants who are alive today. Their lines were dead ends. Hence it was necessary to take chances, try new things, be creative, explore other possibilities. Sailing off into the unknown may be risky, and you might drown or be killed or whatever, but then again if you stay home you won’t reproduce anyway. We’re most descended from the type of men who made the risky voyage and managed to come back rich. In that case he would finally get a good chance to pass on his genes. We’re descended from men who took chances (and were lucky).

    The huge difference in reproductive success very likely contributed to some personality differences, because different traits pointed the way to success. Women did best by minimizing risks, whereas the successful men were the ones who took chances. Ambition and competitive striving probably mattered more to male success (measured in offspring) than female. Creativity was probably more necessary, to help the individual man stand out in some way. Even the sex drive difference was relevant: For many men, there would be few chances to reproduce and so they had to be ready for every sexual opportunity. If a man said “not today, I have a headache,” he might miss his only chance.

    Another crucial point. The danger of having no children is only one side of the male coin. Every child has a biological mother and father, and so if there were only half as many fathers as mothers among our ancestors, then some of those fathers had lots of children.

    Look at it this way. Most women have only a few children, and hardly any have more than a dozen — but many fathers have had more than a few, and some men have actually had several dozen, even hundreds of kids.

    In terms of the biological competition to produce offspring, then, men outnumbered women both among the losers and among the biggest winners.

    • Replies: @Lemmy Tellyuh
  15. G. Poulin says:

    The worst enemy of the Catholic faith is popular Catholicism. I know plenty of Catholics of all stripes who believe in all kinds of idiotic things that they don’t really have to believe in order to be a member of the Church. If Catholics would do their homework for a change, they would believe a lot less.

  16. Christianity is no longer a fighting faith. Catholic mass immigration extremist Pope Tango and the leaders of the Protestant churches have been pushing nation-wrecking mass immigration at a feverish pitch. If a religion no longer is a fighting faith, then it is a croaking faith. Most young men, and middle age guys and geezers, too, want to fight to defend and protect their people and tribe. Christianity has been de-fanged and de-clawed.

    General George Washington and General Andrew Jackson were Christians, but they were Christian Warriors. Most of the generals currently in the US military who claim to be Christians are really just Mammonites who worship globalization and multiculturalism and the American Empire. The American Empire will prove to be a false god for these treasonous US military puppet rat officer scoundrels.

    George Washington and Andrew Jackson were Christians. But Washington and Jackson had balls and brains to go along with their Christianity. Washington and Jackson understood that Christianity was a fighting faith, not a cowardly retreat into tolerance for the intolerable.

    When Washington and Jackson came across obstacles in their way they smashed the hell out of them. They did not weakly repeat some crybaby Christian crap about turning the other cheek. Washington and Jackson turned the other cheek so they could take better aim at their enemies.

    The United States of America will remove and deport its infiltrator populations. That means mass citizenship revocations and mass deportations.

    The above won’t sound so severe when the upcoming global financial implosion hits.

    Tweet from 2015:

  17. Pythas says:
    @Dumbo

    Exactly Dumbo. They are like the jews and niggers and sand-niggers living in the West, give us, give us, give us! We want forced integration with you white people…

  18. Pope’s advisors are giving him some bum steers about which trendy social fads to endorse to keep the old collection plate filled.

    Years ago when I lived in the south, it was explained to me that the third K in KKK stood for Katholics. In traditional American culture there were few beliefs more deeply held than fear and loathing of Catholicism. The Roman Pontiff was the very byword for arbitrary, tyrannical authority and was seen as a devoted adversary of the American experiment in secular self-government. The current composition of SCOTUS regrettably includes a majority of Catholics, and is already bearing out the worst fears of the stalwart folk whose country this once was.

  19. @Anonymous

    Maybe the pope should spend more time praying rather than hanging out with trannies. It would also be nice if he stopped helping the Jews and Protestants flood America with illegals. I got a hundred bucks that says the next pope is non-White.

  20. Faggot Brit clergyman and faggot Belgian priest take drugs and fuck each other; faggot Brit clergyman croaks.

    Fucking cuck faggot Christians.

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13906339/british-clergyman-antwerp-drug-sex-dies-pope-belgium.html

  21. Rich says:
    @don't care

    Normal people don’t “stuff anything up each other’s butts”. You must be a real freak to think they do. But I guess if you spend enough time doing one-handed surfing on porn sites, you might reach that conclusion. Or if you’re hanging out with the wrong crowd. Quit it. Get a Bible, read it cover to cover, and then read it again. Then maybe you can start to be normal.

    • Replies: @raga10
    , @don't care
  22. JR Foley says:
    @Haxo Angmark

    “Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned:” Romans 5:12 —we all die–Amen

  23. @Anonymous

    Yes, women give birth to children and primarily raise them.
    But who created the society/civilisation, with all its creature comforts, etc., wherein she does that birthing and primary raising?

  24. raga10 says:
    @Dumbo

    After the Pope allows for married priests and women bishops, they will be demanding transgender sex orgies in churches and open child sacrifice.

    Anglican church allows for married priests and women bishops, yet I haven’t heard much about sex orgies or child sacrifices. If I had I would probably be Anglican right now!

    Also: changing one’s sex is NOT A SIN!!! There is absolutely nothing in the Bible on this subject. If modifying your body is a problem then every person who had cosmetic surgery will burn in hell… along with everyone who got a tattoo, or had their appendix removed. So what do you object to, exactly?

    • Replies: @don't care
    , @Dumbo
  25. raga10 says:
    @Rich

    Normal people don’t “stuff anything up each other’s butts”.

    One study found that of heterosexual U.S. adults 25 to 44, 36% of women and 44% of men had tried anal sex.
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4949144/

    • Replies: @Rich
  26. Wyrm Pope
    Cunt Patrol
    [S]peaking in some strange Mexican language
    [H]e enjoys blowjobs from the reverse
    Pope Reddit
    [T]wisted and satanic old boy-fucker
    [T]he glorious superiority of vagina people
    [E]nough of this faggotism
    [T]his guy literally promotes gay anal
    The Church is not ‘a woman’ anymore than Jesus was an apple tree.
    Women ruined everything and now their only purpose is to shut up.
    [U]nrepentant homosexuals can receive ‘blessings’ for eating poop.

    I’m dying. (<:)

  27. @Dumbo

    But Francis was not compromising. That’s a failure of interpretation (the same as Anglin’s probably). Francis was being conservative, only in an elegant, perhaps even a little sarcastic, way.

    • Replies: @Dumbo
  28. @Mr blasster

    AA…You may not actually be a Catholic

    Actually, it’s been Cucktholicism since Vatican II “chose” to fellate Chosenite Jewpeen.

  29. @YetAnotherAnon

    Absent the “magic male wand” igniting cold uteri, women ain’t shit. Vag-hags are weaker and less productive than males…on average consuming more than contributing. Like blacks.

    Tribes where vaginates outnumber men soon become the slaves/concubines of tribes with more men than bints. Said conquering tribes also often kill the kids of conquered females.

    Guys need to stop putting themselves down, stop listening to feminist shite.

    If women stopped working for a year, no one would notice.

    If men stopped working for a week, the civilized world would collapse.

    • Replies: @YetAnotherAnon
  30. @Rich

    Yeah they do, and they’re hypocrites about it. Anglin is one of them and this double standard is the reason he obsessively makes the distinction about GAY butt sex in his articles.

    If schools and stuff were promoting heterosexual sodomy you better believe he wouldn’t say shit and nor would anyone else in the anti-gay crowd.

    • Agree: Renard
    • Disagree: Rich
  31. @raga10

    changing one’s sex

    • Replies: @raga10
  32. Rich says:
    @raga10

    One study found that if people believe stupid fake studies, they’ll take all the experimental injections Uncle Sam wants them to. Don’t be ridiculous, 44% of normal people don’t “shove stuff up each other’s butts”. That’s disgusting, it’s dirty back there.

    • Replies: @raga10
  33. MoT says:

    The Whore of Babylon doesn’t even try to pretend any longer.

  34. @Anonymous

    Simple rebuttal: men are demonstrably more important than women, because the existence of the species depends upon reproduction — and while a woman can only bear one child every 9 months (ok, twins or more on rare occasions), a single man can father 250+ children in that same timespan.

  35. raga10 says:
    @Rich

    Don’t be ridiculous, 44% of normal people don’t “shove stuff up each other’s butts”. That’s disgusting, it’s dirty back there.

    Sweet innocent child… remind me to tell you about Santa Claus one of those days. When you’re ready.

    • Replies: @Rich
  36. Dumbo says:
    @raga10

    Also: changing one’s sex is NOT A SIN!!!

    Whtcha talking ’bout Willis? It’s not even POSSIBLE to “change one’s sex”. “Transgender people” are simply mentally ill and deform their body to give it a parodical “female” appearance. Mental illness might not be a sin but could indicate demonic possession (?), which the Bible indeed talks about.

    Also, man and women are more than just their “sex” (sexual organs) or even their bodies. The psychology of men and women is completely different.

    Cosmetic surgery can certainly be a sin (vanity), though not always.

    Tattoos, probably, too (body desecration?), not sure, but in any case they are ugly as hell, especially on women, and a clear symptom of social degeneration (in olden times only sailors or whores had tattoos, and then only the trashiest ones).

    Anglicans are not an example to anyone… It’s a joke as a religion, and it is disappearing, as is any “religion” that allows for “women priests” (unless they are vestal virgins or something).

    • Replies: @raga10
  37. Dumbo says:
    @Brás Cubas

    There is some weird idea among a few Catholics that this “Pope” is some kind of crypto-conservative, that he’s even “based”, an idea that is really hard for me to understand. But maybe “conservative” means different thing to different people. I’d say someone “conservative” in the Catholic Church (although I prefer the more adequate term “traditional”) would be Lefebvre or Viganò (both excommunicated, as far as I know) and anyone who rejects the changes of Vatican II. This Pope is a “ultra-progressive” through and through, in thought and in action, bringing even more changes to the Church. What exactly is “conservative” about him?

    • Disagree: Brás Cubas
    • Replies: @raga10
  38. raga10 says:
    @don't care

    Easy! Take X chromosome, chop off one of its legs and bingo – you’ve got Y chromosome. A pair of scissors will suffice 🙂

    However, I’m not saying mucking around with one’s body is a good idea and I’m certainly not getting into the debate whether trans “women” are real women (although my use of quotation mark should suggest what my personal view is). I am only saying that the Church and those claiming to follow teachings of Jesus have no reason to object. None based on scriptures, at any rate. It’s only their own prejudices dressed up in fake piety.

  39. raga10 says:
    @Dumbo

    “Transgender people” are simply mentally ill

    Exactly, and illness is not a sin. In fact, isn’t the Church supposed to administer to the sick?

    • Replies: @Linus
    , @Dumbo
  40. raga10 says:
    @Dumbo

    Mental illness might not be a sin but could indicate demonic possession

    And there’s only one way to find out: throw them in the river and see if they float, right?

    • Replies: @Dumbo
  41. Linus says:
    @döp-dödö-döp

    Correct. Dealing with the infallibility conundrum is tiresome. Most Catholics don’t get it.

  42. Linus says:
    @raga10

    Are they sick? I don’t think so. They are narcissists, attention-seeking, sexual deviants. Nothing in that rotten stew is necessarily “mentally sick”. But they are evil, and that is how the Church should be dealing with them. Call the exorcist.

    • Replies: @raga10
  43. Rich says:
    @raga10

    Sorry rags, your disgusting practice is rare. Just because porn sites show something happening, doesn’t mean normal people engage in an act that spreads disease and can cause serious physical harm. The rectum isn’t a sex organ. Sorry. Disgusting.

    • Replies: @raga10
  44. raga10 says:
    @Rich

    Just because porn sites show something happening

    Agreed – although since porn caters to viewers fantasies, it could be some indication of what people *would* like to happen. In any case, I gave you the results of an actual study, which you dismissed as “fake” for no particular reason you were willing to share other than it disagrees with your perception. What is your perception based on, then? Do share your sources!

    rectum isn’t a sex organ.

    Well, neither is the mouth, last time I checked. Are you going to claim there is no such thing as blowjobs outside of porn sites either?

    • Replies: @Rich
  45. raga10 says:
    @Linus

    Are they sick? I don’t think so. They are narcissists, attention-seeking, sexual deviants. Nothing in that rotten stew is necessarily “mentally sick”.

    Well, there are plenty of narcissist attention seekers among people of all walks of life and all kinds of sexual kinks. But having your perception misaligned with the reality of your body is something else and certainly qualifies as a form of mental illness in my opinion. On the other hand, while there certainly are activists, some making a career out of it, not all transsexuals are narcissist attention seekers and yes, I’ve known a few. I’m under the impression that most would actually prefer to be left alone rather than be a political football for everybody else but they are not the ones you see and hear, by definition.

    • Replies: @YetAnotherAnon
  46. Dumbo says:
    @raga10

    Well, they are not “sick” except in the figurative sense. I used the term “mental illness” because it is the term used today for such things, but I do not think that most mental conditions are “illnesses” in the literal sense. They are narcissists, sexual deviants, etc etc, but not exactly “ill”.

  47. Dumbo says:
    @raga10

    No, that would be for witches. For demonic possession there’s exorcism, I believe.

    (Incidentally, burning witches seems to have been mostly a Protestant thing. The Catholic Church preferred to burn heretics. The “water trial” satirized by Monty Python also appears to be mostly a Protestant/English thing:

    https://blogs.loc.gov/law/2022/02/swimming-a-witch-evidence-in-17th-century-english-witchcraft-trials/ )

  48. Rich says:
    @raga10

    I never claimed there aren’t a certain percentage of people who engage in abnormal sexual practices. It’s just nowhere near the 44% fake study number you cited. You homosexuals often try to justify your degeneracy by citing fake studies that you think will convince normal people that your habits aren’t so bad. Do you know any normal heterosexuals? Sodomy isn’t anywhere near 44%. Probably isn’t even close to 10%. As much as degeneracy has been pushed on society, I reckon it’s still pretty painful to abuse the rectum, and so, rare.

  49. @Lemmy Tellyuh

    I don’t really disagree with you, but men are more expendable than women, and we put “women and children first” for a reason.

    If, say, all white men (including police, prison officers, army, power workers) went on strike for three months, white women without protection would find a world more like this:

    “Can you imagine what happens to a girl in a labor camp if she’s at all pretty? First of all she’s probably raped on the way there by some of the criminals, or, if not, they do it as soon as she arrives. Then her first evening some of the camp parasites—those damn work overseers, or else the ones who give out the rations—would have her taken naked to the bathhouse and arrange to have a look at her on the way and decide on the spot who she was to belong to. Before morning they would make her a proposition—you’ll live with so-and-so, and you’ll get decent work in a place that’s clean and warm. Well, if she refuses, they see she gets such a rough time that she’ll come crawling back, begging to live with anyone they care to name.” – Cancer Ward, Solzhenitsyn.

  50. @raga10

    You get some gay activists, like the singer Tom Robinson, who end up married with a couple of kids.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Andrew Anglin Comments via RSS