RSS
This is now utterly beyond the pale. In fact, it has been for a while.
The Vatican is now a satanic group, actively trying to destroy the Christian religion with faggot and feminist doctrines that are fundamentally in opposition to the most basic tenets of the Christian faith.
The Pope already legalized what amounts to a pseudo-marriage for homosexuals to be performed in the church, so now he’s just filling in the rest of the church with pro-sodomy advocacy.
The Vatican has included an event organised by LGBT Catholics on its official online calendar for the upcoming 2025 Roman Catholic Holy Year, in an unusual sign of openness by the global Church toward the gay community.
A pilgrimage by the Italian group “La Tenda di Gionata” (Jonathan’s Tent), set for next September, is listed among the hundreds of events planned for the Jubilee, which is expected to bring some 32 million tourists to Rome next year.
The group, which describes its goal as to promote the welcoming of LGBT people within the Church, is expected to host a prayer vigil at a local Rome parish before making a trip to St. Peter’s Basilica.
A Vatican official told Reuters the inclusion of the group on the calendar did not imply support of its events.
This group met with Pope Anus before
“They are not sponsored activities,” said Agnese Palmucci, a spokesperson for the Vatican’s evangelization office, which is organising the Jubilee.
Rome is the global centre of the Catholic Holy Year, which opens on Dec. 24, Christmas Eve, and runs through Jan. 6, 2026. Jubilees like this normally occur once every 25 years.
…
Pope Francis has been credited with leading the Catholic Church into taking a more welcoming approach towards the LGBT community, and has allowed priests to bless same-sex couples on a case-by-case basis.
The Bible says that faggots should be killed.
That’s what it says. It’s not unclear.
The Christian position has always been that homosexuals should be killed.
Just go look at the history. Christian countries, such as the former United States, did not repeal the death penalty for faggotry until the 19th century.
Remember, the Pope started his Crusade for Anus by going around saying African countries should remove the death penalty for homosexuals. Now we know as a factual matter that this was part of a lead up to shoving gay sex down the throats of all Catholics.
The official position of the Church has to be “death penalty to homosexuals.” In practice, you don’t have to hunt them down, or investigate unmarried men. You only need to start using capital punishment if they make their behavior public.
There should also be a death penalty for non-homosexuals (or supposed non-homosexuals) who promote homosexuality as a public good in the way that the Vatican and the Pope are doing. Based on the most basic and accepted Christian doctrine, the Pope has committed a capital offense against all Christians and all people on earth by actively normalizing sodomy and promoting it as a public good.
English
Arabic
Chinese (Simplified)
Dutch
French
German
Hebrew
Hindi
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Russian
Spanish
Swedish
Turkish
Vietnamese
A pilgrimage by the Italian group “La Tenda di Gionata” (Jonathan’s Tent)
They choose the name ‘Jonathan’s Tent’ because they are claiming that King David and the son of Saul, Jonathan, were gay lovers. This will be part of the Vatican’s argument to fully embrace sodomy, since they had misinterpreted Scripture and had been wrong about it all along.
First Samuel 18
Now when he had finished speaking to Saul, the soul of Jonathan was knit to the soul of David, and Jonathan loved him as his own soul. Saul took him that day, and would not let him go home to his father’s house anymore. Then Jonathan and David made a covenant, because he loved him as his own soul. And Jonathan took off the robe that was on him and gave it to David, with his armor, even to his sword and his bow and his belt.
First Samuel 20
As soon as the lad had gone, David arose from a place toward the south, fell on his face to the ground, and bowed down three times. And they kissed one another; and they wept together, but David more so.
Pope POS the First and his gang of perverts strikes again. May he die soon, and may he (and they) rot in hell forever. Amen.
As a practicing Catholic, basically the article is incorrect from the first word. It’s not even worth the time to correct, it’s so bad.
“I hate Christianity, don’t believe in this junk, but here’s what the doctrines should be” is not a great approach to an article.
The media lies and the Vatican does it’s best to corral a billion sheep in that atmosphere.
The only disease-ridden faggot here is the one who wrote this article.
Homosexuals and other deviants are unable to understand male friendship and brotherhood. Everything is perverted sex to them, because with their brain disorder, it doesn’t make sense. The Hebrews were extremely anti-homosexual, it was part of what separated them from their neighbors. David wouldn’t have been tolerated if he’d gone down that path. The man was written about as more of a ladies man who got himself in trouble for an adulterous affair.
The Camel enters the tent, they must figure there’s a ton of money in it ]gay weddings Lawyers, divorce etc] because it’s all about the money and always has been.
I agree. Does Anglin have a dissociative identity disorder?? One day he writes vile racist stuff against blacks, and then the next day Kanye West and Candace Owens (whom he calls a “Nubian queen”) are his heroes.
Yeah, Anglin is not even aware that he’s promoting Talmudic lies and distortions with his attacks on Christ’s True Church.
Always enjoy an Anglin read.
Agree, disagree
It’s always a fun ride.
I met some Siamese Twins yesterday on their way to the Vatican for the Homo Pope’s blessing.
One of the twins is gay and the other is not.
They only have one ass and are hoping that the Pope will decide who will or not will not “bend” to current norms.
I am guessing that the Pope will not “split” the baby and can convince the Hetero to watch “Brokeback Mountain” while his/his ass is being T Rexxed.
The Pope is infallible.
You , are what I call
The judge mental. Simply
Amazing.
As a practicing Catholic, basically the article is incorrect from the first word. It’s not even worth the time to correct, it’s so bad.
Please, reconsider and help us who are not practicing Catholics to understand. What is incorrect here?
Anglin’s first sentences:
“This is now utterly beyond the pale. In fact, it has been for a while.”
Is the Vatican not working with a pro-LGBT group? Has the Vatican not been leaning in this direction for a while?
Too many “practicing Catholics” think and act like members of some third-rate personality cult. They need to grow a brain and learn how to use it.
Smile, there are so many keywords in that statement. Corral, sheep…oh my.
From a tabloid point of view.
Rarely do I find myself better informed or with a widened perspective after skimming an Anglin article.
You are, unfortunately, unable to understand that homosexuality is a disgusting, disease spreading deviancy. Your inability to make proper judgements will eventually cause you problems. The rectum is not a sex organ. Sorry. Your father was neglectful in not telling you that, but maybe he just assumed you were normal enough to understand the facts of life.
You , are what I call The judge mental
Before you get judgmental, you should visit a healthy country where gays are still in the closet. You’ll see normal, heterosexual friendships. Two guys can walk down the street together, holding hands, and nobody thinks anything of it. Parents don’t have to constantly watch their young children and worry about who is around them. It’s really quite refreshing, like after a long winter and walking outside into the sun to find the birds are chirping and the snow has melted.
Ever since the Jewish acquisition of the Catholic Church, nothing surprises me.
Here is the official dogma of the Catholic Church which cannot be changed: homosexual relations are intrinsically disordered. To engage in a homosexual action is a mortal sin (a mortal sin prevents a person from going to heaven).
Pope Francis practices a pastoral approach whose philosophy is that the Catholic Church is a hospital for sinners and bringing them into her doors is essential for the sinner to receive the medicine he requires. This medicine: the true understanding of the teaching of Christ and the reception of the Eucharest. With the understanding and strengthening a person receives, he will reform his life and find strength to disregard the lies of the world. It works!
Pope Francis boldly invites every person in. He recently made available a priestly blessing on couples in irregular situations; believing this blessing will help them advance further to where additional medicine is available to them. Salvation can be a long path of learning and reflexion. Perhaps somewhat corresponding to the length of life we are given.
-Who the heck the know who is really working with the Vatican? Yes, I’m serious here. There are lot more groups that wish the Vatican was working with them than the Vatican works with as a whole. Anyone can pretty much claim to be Catholic (although bishops try to get outside groups to not name themselves that way.) I have no joke seen a website run entirely by Jews that if you didn’t look carefully, most people would think was run by Catholics.
-The posture of the Church has always been to give sinners of all types welcome and a chance to repent. I’m pretty sure sodomy was never a capital crime even in the OT times. However, if I am wrong and if we insist on this road, then fornicators of all kinds and adulators would be prone to this sort of punishment. We’re so down the road of hedonism we forget the everyday and much more common suburban kind that exists in the open since the 1960’s. So the faith has the unique privilege of being seen as too soft on an area where historically she hasn’t really moved all that much. The message still is repent and sin no more for all types of sins, but we aren’t encouraging stoning people either for any of them.
-The Vatican says many complex things, usually directed mostly towards her bishops or specific subgroups. If the concept can fit in a headline or a meme and upsets people, it’s probably wrong. Both right and left leaning media have their reasons for inaccurate reporting around the pope. When I get full documents, interviews, aka context, Pope Francis is appears to be speaking right out of the catechism.
-We have no blessings of same sex relationships nor anything that even looks like it. We have no women priests and Pope Francis is quite clear that it’s never going to happen. Fr. James Martin jumped the shark with his photo op last year. He clearly didn’t read a letter that was intended for him, which said anything that even looked like marriage was to be avoided. Catholic priests bless food, pets, and buildings. If Fido qualifies for a blessing without asking if he’s a very good boy, a simple reminder and invitation for God in someone’s life, so does any sort of sinner in singles, pairs, and groups. What that letter authorized were spontaneous, non marriage, non event, non photographed blessings for same sex pairs to would encourage them to find God and ultimately sinning. Nothing more and nothing less.
Our host is welcome to disagree with all of that. However, I’m actually attending Mass every week including at times liberal parishes. It’s surprisingly based in the worst places despite valiant attempts from the inside to change it. The media quite simply is forever getting it wrong, even at times nominally Catholic outlets.
Yes, it’s super cult like to think that all of the media is lying when it’s lips are moving. Pope Francis job is not President nor to save the West nor to make every society a utopia. It’s to guard the truths of the faith of the Catholic Church. Anyone is welcome to disagree with him on areas like science and politics that are outside his charism. I find however, that it’s a waste of my time. It’s not like world leaders are listening to Pope Francis anyway.
Okay, I guess. The staff that all Catholic bishops carry in formal situations is a Shepard’s crook. All people are sheep relative to God, thus Jesus with the “I am the Good Shepard” speech. And yes, I’m fully aware of the what the analogy means.
Always has been. The Vatican created these modern faggot and feminist doctrines. During the Renaissance, papists replaced most of their residual Christian theology with pagan humanist philosophy. The intellectual lineage is as such:
1. Judaizing pagan philosophy of Thomas Aquinas
2. Renaissance humanism
3. Enlightenment libtardism
4. Modern faggot and feminist doctrines
Hard disagree. With modern technology, it is possible to pinpoint faggots with a very high degree of accuracy, so there is no excuse for allowing them to live. If faggots are allowed to live on the condition that they stay in the closet, the closeted faggots will just end up creating a gay mafia that will act like a secret sodomite society to stealthily take over institutions. The Vatican itself is the prototypical example of this phenomenon, as probably the oldest active gay mafia on earth.
There is obviously no sense,
What So Ever in my attempt at
reason with you. Density, as an
adjective, does not come close.
Are you even human? Your
assumptions are astounding…
Agreed.
If the title is of interest, I will skip the article altogether and go straight to the comments 99.9% of the time.
🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮
Exactly!!!🤮🤮🤮
Correct!!! Feminism and faggotry are the two things that are bringing down America the most!!!
REPEAL THE 19TH!!!
If being human means having your rectum stretched, or stretching another fellows rectum, no, I’m not “human”. Strange how low mankind has fallen. You’re worse than beasts in the field. Get out of the gutter. Stand up and be a man. Just stop what you know in your heart is disgusting and wrong.
I understand, when you were a kid someone turned you out, but that doesn’t have to define you. Think of your poor father and the disgrace he must feel. Just stop it.
Faggots do deserve scorn but mostly they deserve pity. They’re powerless without women exalting and enabling them. The feminization of Western society and women’s liberation are far more deleterious than faggotry. Indeed, as disgusting as fudgepackers may be, heterosexual female promiscuity is infinitely more destructive socially.
So does the Catholic and Christian hierarchy, so did Jesus and the Bible writers.
They knew the analogy being created. It was a straightforward message.
I guess the Catholic Churches’ woke, new Baptism will be to fart semen and shit encrusted gerbil carcasses remains into the baptizand’s face.
A very Biblical observation. ☦️🙏
Ah, the old “hospital for sinners” routine, or what I like to call the “Ann Landers ecclesiology”. Francis must have spent his time reading the advice column in the newspaper, instead of studying the Bible. The man has exactly nothing between his big floppy dago ears. May he croak soon.
Please revisit your original comment, Riffle:
As a practicing Catholic, basically the article is incorrect from the first word. It’s not even worth the time to correct, it’s so bad.
Now you say:
Our host is welcome to disagree with all of that. However, I’m actually attending Mass every week including at times liberal parishes.
Well, which is it? Is Anglin incorrect, or do you merely disagree with him?
Also, what’s with this repetition about being a practicing Catholic? Does this give you some special understanding that non-Catholics simply cannot understand?
It’s possible to practice something, and still be wrong. Homosexuals, for instance. While it certainly appears that your Church is trending towards accepting them, you have failed to refute this point.
Pope Francis is not exactly my cup of tea either. He’s put me through the paces of outrage, etc. Yet, the end result may be better than we think. He has helped many homosexuals change their mind about that path… and that has been his intention. He does not promote homo and the Church can never go that direction no matter what any alarmist might think. His encyclicals are beautiful. He urges us to make sure we always thoroughly understand the position of our opponent before we proceed. He’s convinced people involved with various problems that he’s really listening which helps them to trust him. So lets consider that the Holy Father is receiving light.
Cardinal O’Connor from the steps of St. Patrick’s Cathedral in New York blesses the Gay Day parade. A parade that has among other things marchers dressed in BDSM leather clothes; trannies dressed as nuns, same sex male couples trolling with their “adopted” little boys. The Catholic Church as a whole has accepted and embraced the gay life. As a matter of fact, your Pope Francis has himself said any Catholic who would reject a homosexual as a fellow Catholic is a sinner. Exactly whose mind is he trying to change?
They say the path to hell is lined with the skulls of bishops… nevertheless, the dogma of the Church outlives all bishops including the current Bishop of Rome. The Catholic Church has not gone over to homo because it can’t, but these bishops do cause scandal … so woe to them.
I read of it. Bergoglio is so damaging. Sympathise with the several commentors who who are speaking in his favour.
He is in open heresy on many points. My own theory of the formation of Bergolio’s mind is that he was fine with Operation Condor operations while a priest and a bishop. That is simple truth. He was, to some degree, involved. Guilt on that, plus Modernism.
Bergoglio will not likely live more than ten years longer. He has constantly appointed Cardinals who will continue his heresies, so when he dies, and the Conclave is held,the Catholic Church
He is human, and in my opinion, not the Pope.
Final point, Anglin seems to seek Catholic faith, Bergoglio’s heresys to push him (and me) away.
You sound vaccinated. Get help.
Entirely incorrect and I’m sure no one is surprised that you are.
Some have more discerning tastes and intellect than Anglin and, apparently, you. It’s fine and is what makes the world go ’round.
I often enjoy some humor in my read. I don’t detect malice in Andrew’s essays. If facts and conservative prejudice are included in the piece, so much the better.
I’m sure we disagree, but that’s what discussion is for.
Have a great day.