In my current Taki’s Magazine column on why “polyamory” appears to be emerging as the New Current Thing, I snarked:
The great appeal of polyamory is you can define it to mean whatever you are into. …
Are you a tech nerd born without the Jealousy Gene who has felt, ever since you read in ninth grade Robert A. Heinlein’s sci-fi cult novels Stranger in a Strange Land and The Moon Is a Harsh Mistress (with their lengthy descriptions of complex marriage arrangements), that it would be irrational to restrict yourself to just one woman in return for her restricting herself to just one man? Well, that’s not “wife-swapping” anymore, like they dismissively called it back in Heinlein’s day, that’s now “polyamory,” which sounds much more respectable.
From Time magazine in 2023:
The Surprising Political Evolution of American Polyamory
BY CHRISTOPHER M. GLEASON / MADE BY HISTORY
NOVEMBER 13, 2023 10:00 AM ESTPolyamory seems to have burst upon the American mainstream over the past two decades. … Though studies have shown that Americans from across the political spectrum have embraced forms of consensual non-monogamy, it tends to be liberal progressives who publicly laud polyamory as the next stage of the sexual revolution, while religious conservatives bemoan it as the next step in more than half a century of moral decline. Yet, setting polyamory within the longer history of American sexual dissent uncovers a complicated relationship between politics and sexual freedom that defies simplistic categorization.
The term polyamory was coined in the early 1990s after a coalition of ethical non-monogamists came together to give a name to similar lifestyles many of them had practiced for decades. Though sometimes confused with polygamy, polyamory is distinct in that it tends to be gender egalitarian and queer affirming. …
The clearest link between polyamory and the first decades of the 20th century is traceable through the influence of acclaimed science fiction writer Robert Heinlein. Referring to himself as a “child of the Torrid Twenties,” Heinlein was a sexual iconoclast. His first two marriages in 1929 and 1932 were both open, and he spent the 1930s and 1940s frequenting nudist clubs, and running in countercultural circles that included the occultic sex magician and Cal Tech rocket scientist Jack Parsons and fellow science fiction writer and founder of Scientology L. Ron Hubbard.
Although he was a New Deal liberal throughout the 1930s, the threat of nuclear war galvanized Heinlein, pushing him toward an anti-communist right-wing elitism his critics have charged with bordering on fascism. Such themes are most clearly seen in his lesser-known treatises supporting American nuclear armament and in his more well-known Hugo Award winning 1959 novel, Starship Troopers.
Heinlein’s rightward turn did little to temper his promotion of sexually transgressive ideas. If anything, it reinforced the notion that sexual freedom should be protected as a private right. He lamented monogamy and monotheism as the two sacred cows of western civilization and continued to take aim at both in his novels. The culmination of such efforts was his 1961 novel Stanger in a Strange Land. The novel, which follows a human raised on Mars who returns to Earth and starts a church that rejects jealousy in lieu of ritualistic free love, took little time to become canonical within 1960s counterculture.
Actually, Stranger In a Strange Land, despite its great King James Bible title, took awhile to take off. Heinlein was a close fan of the great Russian-American writer Vladimir Nabokov, and when his pedophilic Lolita became a vast bestseller in 1958, Heinlein decided book censorship was doomed so it would pay to complete Stranger.
One issue slowing Heinlein’s appeal was that he was too easily bored to become a cult leader like his friend L. Ron Hubbard or colleague Ayn Rand. His three famous cult novels appeal to different cults: 1959’s Starship Troopers to militarists, 1961’s Stranger in a Strange Land to druggies, and 1966’s The Moon Is a Harsh Mistress to libertarians.
Heinlein suffered massive cerebral problems from 1966-1969, following his best all-around novel, the libertarian The Moon Is a Harsh Mistress.
Heinlein hadn’t trained to be a writer, being a US Navy officer from 1927-1934 when tuberculosis forced him into early retirement, and then into various careers such as gold mine operator and campaign manager in Upton Sinclair’s 1934 leftist-utopian run for governor of California. He only started publishing science fiction stories in 1939 at age 33, but then quickly emerged as the “dean” of sci-fi. His status as the natural leader of science fiction was cemented at the first sci-fi convention in 1941, where as the chief honoree he also took over as the officer-and-gentleman host for the all socially awkward attendee nerds. His speech extolling his fans as the future of the world was a galvanizing moment in 20th Century social history.
Heinlein kept improving as a writer in the 1940s and his 1950s juvenile novels aimed at high IQ 13 year old boys are classics. His 1960s books are more erratic, but his 1966 novel The Moon Is a Harsh Mistress, with its Russian-inflected prose style stolen from Anthony Burgess’s A Clockwork Orange, suggests he was still improving after 27 years in the business.
Heinlein smuggles into Moon a lot of propaganda for polyamory via his narrator, Manny the mixed race regular guy computer repairman of the Luna colony:
My one grandfather was shipped up from Joburg for armed violence and no work permit, other got transported for subversive activity after Wet Firecracker War. Maternal grandmother claimed she came up in bride ship—but I’ve seen records; she was Peace Corps enrollee (involuntary), which means what you think: juvenile delinquency female type. As she was in early clan marriage (Stone Gang) and shared six husbands with another woman, identity of maternal grandfather open to question. But was often so and I’m content with grandpappy she picked. Other grandmother was Tatar, born near Samarkand, sentenced to “re-education” on Oktyabrakaya Revolyutsiya, then “volunteered” to colonize in Luna.
“Mannie, you’re married. Ja?”
“Da. It shows?”
“Quite. You’re nice to a woman but not eager and quite independent. So you’re married and long married. Children?”
“Seventeen divided by four.”
“Clan marriage?”
“Line. Opted at fourteen and I’m fifth of nine. So seventeen kids is nominal. Big family.”
“It must be nice. I’ve never seen much of line families, not many in Hong Kong. Plenty of clans and groups and lots of polyandries but the line way never took hold.”
“Is nice. Our marriage nearly a hundred years old. Dates back to Johnson City and first transportees—twenty-one links, nine alive today, never a divorce. Oh, it’s a madhouse when our descendants and inlaws and kinfolk get together for birthday or wedding—more kids than seventeen, of course; we don’t count ‘em after they marry or I’d have ‘children’ old enough to be my grandfather. Happy way to live, never much pressure. Take me. Nobody woofs if I stay away a week and don’t phone. Welcome when I show up. Line marriages rarely have divorces. How could I do better?”
“I don’t think you could. Is it an alternation? And what’s the spacing?”
“Spacing has no rule, just what suits us. Been alternation up to latest link, last year. We married a girl when alternation called for boy. But was special.”
Then, Heinlein’s health, always poor, collapsed.
But he then awoke, like Lord Byron, at the end of the 1960s to find himself famous and rich as hippies had in the interim adopted Stranger as their cult novel. It reads like various coke fiends ranting about their various theories to “Oh, wow”-saying weed heads. The first chapters are thrilling but then it becomes a drag.
But it sold. Not surprisingly, the cognitively damaged Heinlein then produced more but lesser imitations of Stranger in the 1970s and early 1980s, with what I presume are dire results. While I have read practically every word he published from 1939-1966, I’ve avoided most of his post Moon books. After he recovered enough to start writing again in the 1970s, he was pretty terrible, but he was famous and sold a lot of copies. From Time:
Many within the counterculture opted out of politics. The anti-war movement tended to draw those who were politically inclined toward the New Left. But there were others, like university student Tim Zell, who believed sexual freedom and small government were linked. In 1967, Zell founded a neo-Pagan church in St. Louis modeled after Heinlein’s novel. Prior to that, Zell and his friends had been acolytes of Rand, and their early newsletters heckled campus socialists while promoting Barry Goldwater as the presidential candidate best suited to preserve American freedom. During the early 1970s Zell married Heinlein’s ideas with Randian libertarianism, producing a magazine, Green Egg, which set spiritualist appeals to cast off the restrictive bonds of monogamy alongside articles on anarcho-capitalism. In 1990, Zell’s wife, Morning Glory, would go on to coin the term “polyamorous” in the magazine’s pages.
Zell’s church was not the only Heinlein-influenced poly-precursor with conservative political leanings. Also influential was the Kerista Commune, which proliferated first in New York during the 1960s and then in San Francisco throughout the 1970s and 1980s. The commune is best known in poly circles as originating the concept of “polyfidelity,” the notion that intimacy between more than two people is acceptable if it remains within a closed group.
Keristans believed that sex and capitalism were both central to creating a global utopia. They thought if they could replicate financially successful clusters of polyfidelitous communes around the world, they could deter the emerging Third World from Soviet propaganda, thwarting the spread of communism. Calling themselves the “Hip Right,” they cut ties with anyone who questioned their shared devotion to capitalism and group marriage. Before it disbanded in 1991, the commune became the largest Apple computer dealer in Northern California, generating tens of millions in sales. Disaffected members later disseminated many of Kerista’s ideas into polyamory’s vocabulary.
Keep in mind that Heinlein himself was too interesting to be a cult leader. He tended to get easily bored and move on to a new idea. So it took a lot of character for Heinlein to resist becoming a cult leader like Hubbard or Rand.
Besides polyamory, Heinlein also was into transgenderism, with his genius late 1950s short story “All You Zombies” in which time travel, a sex change operation, and the old song “I’m My Own Grandfather,” allows Heinlein to posit his solipsistic view of himself as the only consciousness in the universe.
Heinlein had lots of other fetishes, too. But not all of them have taken off into the sacred sphere like transgenderism and, potentially, polyamory. For example, he was really into nudism, such as into The Door into Summer and The Puppet Masters. The latter is a brilliant alien invasion story that serves as a logical excuse for why all the women in America have to go naked all summer.
Presumably, Heinlein liked the non-sexual euphoric kick of tanning, but c’mon, he also had what The Onion in its 1998 prime called a Naked-Lady Fetish.
Area Man Has Naked-Lady Fetish
Published October 21, 1998
ST. JOHNSBURY, VT–Looking at Warren Geary, you’d never suspect. A respected business owner and devoted family man, the 41-year-old Geary, by all outward indications, would appear to be just like anyone else in this sleepy New England hamlet of 4,700.
Dig a little deeper, beyond the many years of PTA involvement and Kiwanis Club membership, and you’ll discover a very different Warren Geary, one who derives sexual stimulation and pleasure from the sight of unclothed women. This seemingly normal husband and father of three has a naked-lady fetish.
“I really enjoy looking at naked ladies,” Geary said. “I don’t know what it is, but seeing women without clothes gets me excited.”
While Heinlein’s kinks for polyamory and transgenderism have elevated themselves into privileged identities in the 21st Century, his nudism fetish is increasingly out of fashion.
I have only one nudist anecdote but it does involve a harsh racial divide.
Once, on a beach in Brittany, I noticed that none of the French went into the water but that the girls and women were many of them sunbathing nude.
However, into the water noisily plunged the northern barbarians, British and Dutch. Not much changed in a millennium and a half, then?
I always thought that Curtis “Moldbug” Yarvin, Heinlein’s successor as tech-libertarian propagandist, had an identical pompous, pedantic writing style.
For some reason, sci-fi writers tend to be sexual perverts of some kind.
https://thembeforeus.com/moira-greyland-i-was-born-into-a-family-of-famous-gay-pagan-authors-in-the-late-sixties/
"He told me unequivocally that no man would ever want me, because all men are secretly gay and have simply not come to terms with their natural homosexuality."
It looks as though Walter came from a pretty dysfunctional background himself. Men who like boys and adolescent males seem irresistibly attracted to orphanages, Borstals, residential homes, "care settings":
We are in an age of deep silliness, but ultimately any nation/civilization that wants to preserve itself will have to do some sort of eugenics--to replace nature's harsh culling. And hopefully a lot of pervert will be culled along with other various deleterious mutations in a general eugenic program.Replies: @Jack D, @Almost Missouri, @Pixo
I don’t know about that. Cult leaders are typically people with what is now called a personality disorder. Pathological liars, narcissists, sociopaths, etc. They may be particularly “high-functioning,” but when you read their biographies they come off as utter scoundrels.
So I wouldn’t go so far as to say it would take “a lot” of character for an influential author to resist that temptation, just as it shouldn’t take a lot of character for a money manager to resist stealing from his clients.
Once, on a beach in Brittany, I noticed that none of the French went into the water but that the girls and women were many of them sunbathing nude.
However, into the water noisily plunged the northern barbarians, British and Dutch. Not much changed in a millennium and a half, then?Replies: @YetAnotherAnon, @Mike Tre, @J.Ross
My young children were scandalised by the topless beach volleyball at Carteret in Normandy, but the game’s probably finished by now.
A nudist resort at Benares
Took a midget in, all unawares.
He made members weep
For he just couldn’t keep
His nose out of private affairs
It said, "We told you so."
.Wait a second , doesn’t every guy have that?
NOT IN THE CURRENT YEAR! PLEASE GOD, NOT IN THE CURRENT YEAR!
I enjoy naked ladies as much as the next guy, but there’s this thing called selectivity.
Some things are best appreciated in private. Take fine wines, for example…
Most nudities are banal. Perhaps this is your situation. Other's nudity must be beheld. Sometimes it requires the imposition of nudity to make those who are resistant to my nudity to behold it. Like the Filipino family who live next door.
Today in America? It’d be even worse. It’d be a parade of morbidly obese, tattooed bodies.Replies: @Almost Missouri
Wokies don’t look good naked.
Oh Christ, not Heinlein again.
I picked up one of his books (maybe “Stranger”?) as a teenager, and after about a page and a half I couldn’t bear it any more, the bad writing was just torture, even for a teen. Who cares what his ideas were? — the dude couldn’t write his way out of a candy store with a troop of boy scouts as his guide.
Pretty much all sci-fi rolls that way. The “gom jabbar” passage in Dune is kinda-sorta tolerable, but after that… kill me please!!
If you grow up on Coleridge, Catullus, and Oscar Wilde, you’re bound to bump into a few disappointments.
Coleridge? To this day, he remains as mysterious to me as William Blake. I mean, wtf?Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease
I only met one real life devotee of Stanger in a Strange Land: a friend of a friend in college. Being about my own age, he was obviously born too late for the 1960s counterculture, but he tried to recreate a bit of it within his own personal orbit anyway, without much success as far as I could tell, beyond temporarily convincing a post-hippie hippie co-ed to do some free love with him.
His other cultural polestar was that ’70s movie about the young man who sleeps with the old granny. Maybe that was his backup plan if reigniting free love within his own generation didn’t pan out?
Harold and Maude? I enjoyed that film as a student, not sure why.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harold_and_MaudeReplies: @Almost Missouri
“His other cultural polestar was that ’70s movie about the young man who sleeps with the old granny.”
Harold and Maude? I enjoyed that film as a student, not sure why.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harold_and_Maude
I saw it a long time ago. Sort of an early '70s period piece. I don't remember having much other reaction than that.
I had forgotten the detail about her being a "Holocaust survivor". If the movie were made today, that would probably somehow be grounds to ban it, though the exact logic would be vague. Cultural appropriation? Traducing of the sacred? Antisemitism?
It is common for liberals to say many young men are libertarian when they are young and naive but become liberals like themselves when they are older and wiser. This certainly wasn’t the case with Heinlein. He was an FDR Democrat in the thirties but was very libertarian by the sixties.
The same was true of my journalistic hero H.L Mencken when I was a college journalism major. Mencken was the darling of the liberals in the twenties but lost popularity with them in the thirties when he started attacking FDR and saying nice things about Coolidge. My other journalistic idol in college, George Orwell, started as a socialist but wrote a positive review of Hayek’s Road to Serfdom when he was older.
There was likely more actual polyamory in the US past than today. In the US past there was much more experimentation with “intentional communities”, mostly religious and what today would be called cults.
The Oneida Community was a perfectionist religious communal society … practiced communalism … group marriage … Oneida stirpiculture (a form of eugenics) …
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oneida_Community
My understanding is that the female decedent’s of the Oneida weren’t cooperative with their mum’s communal blah blah blah. Beyond the communal sexual practices, they, both male and female, thought the product of Oneida industry should be retained by the heirs not distributed to the workers. The Oneida probably are the best documented case of the failure of polyamory to be multigenerational.
There were a lot of similar shenanigans going on in the ant-Tsarist circles then, too. There, as in America, there was a whole lotta shakin' going on. The Shakers were cool.
I raised an eyebrow this week when I saw that a band named The Decembrists was playing soon at the 9:30 Club in Washington.
A big lesson I took from experiencing the 1960s-70s and knowing about the previous century: patterns repeat. But there are always new factors/variables being thrown into the same ancient programs.Replies: @ScarletNumber
“Heinlein was a close fan of the great Russian-American writer Vladimir Nabokov, and when his pedophilic Lolita”
The first sentence of wikipedia’s page on Lolita:
“Lolita is a 1955 novel written by Russian-American novelist Vladimir Nabokov that addresses the controversial subject of hebephilia. ”
Wikipedia is correct, Sailer is wrong. Further, I never read Lolita or saw its film adaptations. It’s a sad measure of our society that so many people loved this twisted tale of kitty porn.
“While Heinlein’s kinks for polyamory and transgenderism have elevated themselves into privileged identities in the 21st Century, his nudism fetish is increasingly out of fashion.”
Being attracted to the nude female body is a fetish? Who knew! Maybe “nudism” is out of fashion because it’s the one thing he was supposedly into that isn’t degenerate, sick, and or weird.
Yuks aside (good as they are), I'll point out that Steve S. referred to a "nudism" fetish. I've never been in a nudist situation, so admittedly I'm conjecturing. But I would think there's a big difference between being in private with a nekkid woman, whom you usually don't see nekkid, with romantic mutual intent, contrasted with seeing everybody naked, women included, doing everyday social things, not to include doing the horizontal tango. The first is exciting; the second, I'd think, would be pretty banal. If I had some compelling attraction to the second, that would seem like a fetish.Replies: @Mike Tre
The problem with Nudism is an increasing percentage of people are living arguments against it.
I remember that nude beaches were kind of a thing back in the late 1960s, 70s.
Agree with your assessment.
In 2024, the average American male is 5'9" and 199 pounds. The average American female is 5'3" and 171 pounds (Note: the female weight number is from 2021, the most current I could find...they can't handle the truth).
It was a different world. The "OK, Boomer" crowd can't understand how delightful it was.
Speaking of body weight:
https://www.facebook.com/wsmbrianshaw/videos/301639672864259Replies: @notbe mk 2
Once, on a beach in Brittany, I noticed that none of the French went into the water but that the girls and women were many of them sunbathing nude.
However, into the water noisily plunged the northern barbarians, British and Dutch. Not much changed in a millennium and a half, then?Replies: @YetAnotherAnon, @Mike Tre, @J.Ross
There was a small beach area sort of isolated by some rock formations south of Zuma Beach (IIRC) that was rumored to be a nudist beach. So me and a couple of my curious high school friends made our way over to it and discovered one of the simple truths about perception and reality: It was almost all middle aged fat guys; a couple of them lucky enough to have their scrawny middle aged wives (or whatever) sitting beside them. We made a hasty retreat.
New Jersey has one of the most popular nude beaches on the east coast. When non-nudists picture Sandy Hook in their minds, they think that it is going to be populated with models, but a few moments on the beach will quickly disabuse you of that notion. It’s the same cross section of humanity that you would normally encounter, except without bathing suits. In fact one could make the argument that a nude beach self selects for the unattractive, since there is little value in seeing them nude, just like most polyamorous are physically unattractive.
The reason why nudism hasn’t really taken off is that Americans are prudes at their very core. A nude scene in a movie will cause a movie to receive a more-strict rating than it normally would, while a scene containing violence or blood or other gore will receive a shrug from the ratings board. In addition, most people are quite uncomfortable with the mixture of children and nudity, even in a non-sexual context. My English-teacher friends tell me that they must censor Romeo and Juliet (Zeffirelli 1968) because of its brief topless scene but when I was in school we watched it without any issue.
In Blame It on Rio (Donen 1984) Michael Caine and Joseph Bologna decide to go to a topless beach where of course they run into their daughters Demi Moore and Michelle Johnson. Moore’s straight long black hair was placed perfectly to cover her areola but Johnson was more of a trooper and was truly topless in the movie. Also, despite the physical similarity between Bologna and Moore the father/daughter casting is switched for reasons of plot.
Walter Williams was right: Replies: @ScarletNumber, @Wilkey
Trouper vs. Trooper
Trouper vs. Trooper – Meaning, Difference & ExamplesYet another example of many homophonic "smart people's errors". The unlettered often don't know these phrases at all. And bottomless, in one brief shot. She was 17 at the time. Good thing the state they chose to film in was not New York or California, with their strict protections for underage actors, but Rio de Janeiro. The shot itself was in a grey area between innocent and "sexualized", and the actress on the cusp of adulthood, so there wasn't much of a fuss. Fastidiousness was not a hallmark of this production. The story bounced back and forth between São Paulo ("where the work is done") and Rio ("where the fun is done"). To illustrate such travel, they used a stock clip of a Varig jumbo jet. For what was the equivalent of the Trump Shuttle! C'mon, guys... Trump used 727s, not 747s, and that Varig was on its way to Lisbon.Replies: @Jack D, @SafeNow
I am by far the most conservative mom in my neighborhood and am fine with this sort of thing but only let my kids consume media from before the Awokening and keep them off the internet.Replies: @Twinkie
Growing past sexual jealousy is part of the maturing of western society, away from its roots in barbaric Middle Eastern tribal practice. Finding a new sexual partner is one of life’s greatest delights. To deny this pleasure to someone you supposedly love is just selfishness, motivated by insecurity, sanctified by a ridiculously obsolete religious idea.
Looking closely at the pantheon of Golden Age Science Fiction writers, it is is notable just how many of them were weirdos or perverts of one kind or another.
Polyamory doesn’t work. It’s against human nature. Jealousy, an inborn human trait, will cause troubles within the ranks and eventually one man will emerge as the alpha within the clan. In hippie communes, this is what usually happened. The problem of disease spread and childcare also becomes important since most men aren’t willing to care for children they aren’t sure are theirs. Our unmarried slut society isn’t even working out as most of the promiscuous age out of the game and find themselves sad and alone as time passes. Monogamy is the proven strategy to long-term health and happiness for both the individual and society.
While not as obviously broken/insane as the "must have immigration!" b.s. or our fertility situation--which fail basic 6th grade math--with only a little knowledge of human sexual behavior, polyamory fails a trivial game theory 101 analysis.
If you could actually force people to do it, polyamory would be a way of culling the genes of diligent "provider betas"--precisely the unexciting but productive "thing" guys who have made the West (and now the East) so prosperous--as the gals coming into heat would somehow manage to get knocked up by the group's alphas. But absent a gun to the head, these arrangements are so unstable they usually just spin apart. Well said, Rich.Replies: @Jack D
We have done the experiment with the Black community over the last sixty years of replacing husbands and fathers with welfare checks and the results have been disastrous. The same thing has been happening with working class Whites, just at a slower pace. Getting and staying married is increasingly becoming an upper class thing, as Charles Murray pointed out in his recent Coming Apart book.
Most men just do not care much about children who are not theirs so two people getting married and staying together usually ends up best in the long run.
This was said to be growing popular and members were all greatly enthusiastic to pioneer this new lifestyle.
It may have lasted for a few months or longer towards the end of the mid 80s. Can't recall exactly.
As you might imagine, the "dawn" of this new free lifestyle of sexual freedom and communal sharing was quickly decimated (or totally ended) by the advent of AIDS.
I doubt if any members survived and there are probably some articles in Mother Jones or left-gay periodicals, newspapers about this.
I was reminded of this effort a few years ago when in Amsterdam in Vondelpark. It was a rare very warm sunny day there and everyone was going as bare as possible in normally rainy Holland.
Wife and I walked by a large gaggle of very tall young (gay, undoubtedly) males practically piled on top of each other soaking up the sun on their nearly naked bodies. Ten at least.
Quite a sight, though more exuberant sun bathing than sexual.
I assumed these guys were friends or in some kind of group outing.
Of course by then the HIV epidempic was largely controlled.
But i was reminded of the story just a few decades earlier which had ended this prior collective group/sexual experiment quite harshly.
"It's what you think you know, but don't, that can kill you..."
… What? Where? When? Is he talking about the inflow of recently-arrived unassimilating Muslims? I would have bet that “journalist” would be a pretty safe occupation for faggots, but there is the problem that fags often, even after legalization and acceptance, live in their own world.
The reason why nudism hasn't really taken off is that Americans are prudes at their very core. A nude scene in a movie will cause a movie to receive a more-strict rating than it normally would, while a scene containing violence or blood or other gore will receive a shrug from the ratings board. In addition, most people are quite uncomfortable with the mixture of children and nudity, even in a non-sexual context. My English-teacher friends tell me that they must censor Romeo and Juliet (Zeffirelli 1968) because of its brief topless scene but when I was in school we watched it without any issue.
In Blame It on Rio (Donen 1984) Michael Caine and Joseph Bologna decide to go to a topless beach where of course they run into their daughters Demi Moore and Michelle Johnson. Moore's straight long black hair was placed perfectly to cover her areola but Johnson was more of a trooper and was truly topless in the movie. Also, despite the physical similarity between Bologna and Moore the father/daughter casting is switched for reasons of plot.Replies: @Mr. Anon, @Sam Hildebrand, @prosa123, @Almost Missouri, @rushed boob job, @James J. O'Meara, @J.Ross, @Crawfurdmuir, @Reg Cæsar, @Twinkie, @Grey cat, @Rich
It’s remarkable – the speed at which Hollywood churns through starlets. I’d never heard of Michelle Johnson (I never saw the movie you mentioned) but looking her up on IMDB, I notice that one of her starring roles was Beaks: The Movie, a horror flick about killer chickens.
It's a New York Jew perverted melodrama but with gentile names. Michael Caine is Woody Allen.
https://www.crazydaysandnights.net/2017/11/four-for-friday-raped-for-part.html
"Lisa" = Michelle JohnsonReplies: @BB753, @Almost Missouri
Harold and Maud! Do you enjoy knives?
Once, on a beach in Brittany, I noticed that none of the French went into the water but that the girls and women were many of them sunbathing nude.
However, into the water noisily plunged the northern barbarians, British and Dutch. Not much changed in a millennium and a half, then?Replies: @YetAnotherAnon, @Mike Tre, @J.Ross
Well ya know, the Dutch are yokels.
It is easy to find nudity attractive when everyone is young and unwrinkled, such as during the adolescence and early adulthood of the boomer generation. As the years pass, the attraction fades and eventually only the most zealous (or credulous) keep with it. On the other hand, from my very limited experience of it, I will admit that there’s a “Tout comprendre, c’est tout pardonner” aspect to it, meaning that it can lead you to a state of indifference toward others’ imperfections.
Nudism is just a trick dirty old men play on young hot chicks to see them naked on the beach. Much how many of the cults of 1960s California were horny old codgers with some rizz and gravitas convincing lost little girls and women from broken homes that, you know what, wearing nothing (or next to nothing) and sleeping with the leader and obeying him was really the way to happiness.
Today, being a nudist is out of fashion because its everywhere online. For a guy in the 20th century, fantasizing about a world where all the hot young chicks frolicked naked was a pipe dream. This was the era where the Sears Catalog was used as sexual stimulation for many men and Hugh Hefner could pretend his “swingin’” Playboy scene was mysterious and cool instead of cheap porn with Hollywood escorts. The emergence of the bikini mid-century was a scandal and had movies/songs dedicated to it (my favorite: “The Ghost and the Bikini.”)
But today, you can hop online and find 10,000 different attractive enough women in pornographic scenes and doing nudes on OnlyFans. Heinlen’s fantasy perversion has come true, and he would be bored by it. Either that, or he’d never leave the house and have a serious pornography addiction.
OT – Let them eat cereal!
Dig in to a nutritious three-course dinner of Fruit Loops, Honey Smacks, and Frosted Flakes.
In the future, you’ll own nothing and you’ll eat crap.
Can't get enough of that "Sugar Crisp"!
Nudism is a hobby, not an identity. Nudists are social. They love nature and good weather and, most of all, idle chit chat with other nudists.
True unless you’re into round and doughy.
I believe you mean Harold and Maude, where some teenager sleeps with a Holocaust survivor in the 1970s (!).
I’m pretty sure the guy you’re describing was a sex addict who was trying anything to get his rocks off. Would not be surprised if he also tried some gay hookups or swingers clubs (if he could get a hooker or easy gf to go). Probably had a huge pornography habit and thought Hugh Hefner was some kind of swinging cool kid.
“Geniuses” and “intellectuals” are always trotting out their brilliant new insights on why whatever it is the society has been doing is wrong–“backward”, “unhealthy”, “damaging”, “primitive” …–and it really ought to be doing their great new wonderful idea.
I’d say that perhaps the most fundamental insight of an intelligent person is that a society’s long existing practices are culturally evolved and exist because … they work.
And, of course, the corollary: breaking them for your new fangled “great idea” is almost certainly doing to “not work”–and quite likely be a disaster.
Also would like to point out for the "every single time" crowd-- Robert Heinlein, not a Jew.
OTOH, I suppose there is a natural bias for "intellectuals" to sneer at normie culture. It wouldn't make the intellectual look very important or interesting to just say: "conventional wisdom seems about right, I don't see any important issue to talk about here."
Heinlein was a bold and unconventional thinker but shallow. He started early in his career, writing Libertarian juvenile fiction and ended it writing juvenile Libertarian fantasy.
a) for Islamistan- they are living in a continual religious stupor & not evolving in the past 800 years
b) for India- they cannot liberate themselves from the basic Hindu cast(e) of mind
c) for east Asia (China etc.)- they cannot be but an anthill where individualism is an alien concept. Hyper-functional anthills.Replies: @Twinkie
I read a lot of science fiction when I was young, and as a typical straight teenage boy I found quite a lot to titillate me. (I very distinctly remember reading The Puppet Masters and getting a kick out of all the nakedness). At the time I assumed that the authors were simply exploring alternative sexual possibilities the same way they explored alternative technologies or alternative social structures or alternative histories and so on. That seemed to me the whole point of science fiction: exploring all the possible ways that things could be different. I gradually noticed though cases where authors would repeat the same distinctively odd scenarios in different stories, and I eventually came to realize that in many (most?) cases the authors were simply using the narrative freedom of science fiction to safely smuggle their own personal sexual fetishes into their their work.
Also: Naked? With Strangers? In Europe, It’s How You Relax at the Spa.
Steve, I’m surprised you didn’t mention Stranger in a Strange Land‘s most famous devotee, the iconic Californian, convicted murder, and charismatic cult leader, Charles Manson.
Manson picked up Stranger in a Strange Land in prison in 1963 and was fascinated. The New Republic writes (https://newrepublic.com/article/145906/charles-mansons-science-fiction-roots):
Manson then went on to attract a following among newly emancipated prole white working class women from the Central Valley, whom he trafficked for sex to various entertainers like The Beach Boys, under the guise of running a band himself. But the atmosphere of his cult – mind control, mindless sex, drugs – is very much an homage to Heinlein’s novel, with its ironic presentation of free love and organized religion. Not that Heinlein ever cared to be associated with Manson.
Although I grew up in southern California, I was not allowed to read Stranger in a Strange Land. Instead, my Naval Academy graduate father presented me with Starship Troopers on my tenth birthday and told me to read it. I’ve been a devotee of the far right and a fan of the Master ever since.
The first election in which women voted as equals to men was run by polygamists:
Not quite true. Unmarried women could vote in New Jersey in the early years of statehood. A full half-century before Seraph (Brigham’s grandniece) was born.
The reason why nudism hasn't really taken off is that Americans are prudes at their very core. A nude scene in a movie will cause a movie to receive a more-strict rating than it normally would, while a scene containing violence or blood or other gore will receive a shrug from the ratings board. In addition, most people are quite uncomfortable with the mixture of children and nudity, even in a non-sexual context. My English-teacher friends tell me that they must censor Romeo and Juliet (Zeffirelli 1968) because of its brief topless scene but when I was in school we watched it without any issue.
In Blame It on Rio (Donen 1984) Michael Caine and Joseph Bologna decide to go to a topless beach where of course they run into their daughters Demi Moore and Michelle Johnson. Moore's straight long black hair was placed perfectly to cover her areola but Johnson was more of a trooper and was truly topless in the movie. Also, despite the physical similarity between Bologna and Moore the father/daughter casting is switched for reasons of plot.Replies: @Mr. Anon, @Sam Hildebrand, @prosa123, @Almost Missouri, @rushed boob job, @James J. O'Meara, @J.Ross, @Crawfurdmuir, @Reg Cæsar, @Twinkie, @Grey cat, @Rich
Overpaid, lazy, dimwitted, whiny teachers showing soft porn movies in class instead of actually teaching.
Walter Williams was right:
But there is strong justification for showing "R&J" in a classroom, especially since it's a movie that teenagers would otherwise not be inclined to watch. The language of Shakespeare can seem extremely tedious to teenagers, but seeing it actually performed can demonstrate that there is real blood and life in those dramas that transcends time and space.
The reason why nudism hasn't really taken off is that Americans are prudes at their very core. A nude scene in a movie will cause a movie to receive a more-strict rating than it normally would, while a scene containing violence or blood or other gore will receive a shrug from the ratings board. In addition, most people are quite uncomfortable with the mixture of children and nudity, even in a non-sexual context. My English-teacher friends tell me that they must censor Romeo and Juliet (Zeffirelli 1968) because of its brief topless scene but when I was in school we watched it without any issue.
In Blame It on Rio (Donen 1984) Michael Caine and Joseph Bologna decide to go to a topless beach where of course they run into their daughters Demi Moore and Michelle Johnson. Moore's straight long black hair was placed perfectly to cover her areola but Johnson was more of a trooper and was truly topless in the movie. Also, despite the physical similarity between Bologna and Moore the father/daughter casting is switched for reasons of plot.Replies: @Mr. Anon, @Sam Hildebrand, @prosa123, @Almost Missouri, @rushed boob job, @James J. O'Meara, @J.Ross, @Crawfurdmuir, @Reg Cæsar, @Twinkie, @Grey cat, @Rich
I have never been to the nekkid beach at Sandy Hook, and have zero desire to go, but I have heard that it is the biggest sausage party this side of the Krakow Kielbasa Fest.
Moldbug’s style is a slightly less prolix version of Carlyle’s, which is itself in the tradition of the Erasmian ideal of copia.
Took a midget in, all unawares.
He made members weep
For he just couldn't keep
His nose out of private affairsReplies: @Reg Cæsar
A joke in a ’60s Playboy had a nudist hiking alone in the woods belonging to his camp. He would occasionally come across signs saying “Beware of homosexuals”, each somewhat lower than the one before. The last sign was barely above ground level, and obscured by vegetation, so he bent over to have a look.
It said, “We told you so.”
” The search for the man who terrorizes Nudist Camps with a bacon slicer continues. Inspector Lemuel Jones, of the Metropolitan Police received a tip off this morning. He hopes to return to the case when he is back on duty “.
Ronnie Barker 1976.
Blame it on Rio is truly hilarious and Michelle Johnson was breath-taking.
Heinlein did get back to form briefly is his later years. “Job: a Comedy of Justice” is quite funny.
Heinlein’s claim that he started writing science fiction due to a contest turned out to be bunk. His posthumously published novel “For Us, the Living” is a pure propaganda piece for free love, and absolutely terrible as a piece of fiction. But it is retroactively interesting in how many themes and turns of phrase found in that novel surface in his later works.
Beach nudity can be dangerous due to UV sunlight exposure.
Just like shirtless (male) bathing suit exposure or bikini wearing. Only more so.
There are somewhat effective sunscreen lotions but only short term effective.
Sun exposure can really age your skin and models and skin aware celebrities (men and women) are careful to cover their faces and arms, not expose them.
I have seen the negative effects of this on a woman I knew long ago from up north who loved to tan. I live in a southern latitude and everyone we knew warned her about her incessant tanning.
Some years ago, after about a 30 year gap, I happened to see her in a store. She was younger than me but looked much older, shockingly so. Really had ruined her skin.
I’m sure hard core nudists are aware of the dangers. Outdoors, with wind, sand, bugs, etc. not a great long term practice, Though some Vit D benefit.
People in southern latitudes (especially women) usually cover up head to toe, with large hats/scarves. Refined women prior to the mid 20th century always covered up carefully, to preserve their younger skin look.
I think “nudism” as a sexual titillation is very short term. Like eating too much ice cream, the buzz quickly wears off. The imagination is stronger than the reality.
How many people over say, 25, look good naked? The visual appeal thing is mainly a male trait anyway. If women cared much about male looks in humans, we’d never have made it as a species.
I really wish you didn’t tell me that about Heinlein. Such a cuck, that he ran around in cuck circles! THAT particular cuck ring too. Were they secretly pegging Ray Bradbury in the UCLA library basement in order to power themselves to the moon? Shieeet. DROPPED.
OT:
Do we need a codicil to Sailer’s Law of Mass Shootings?
https://gab.com/Dissidentsoaps/posts/111981940805483071
–> More shots fired without effect than held in two magazines: shooter is lady cops. <–
The Gab link says "90 shots" but I only hear about half that.
NY Times version:
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/13/us/houston-shooting-deputies-apartment-intruder.html
Low-IQ media darling Ben Crump is on the case, so you’ll probably be hearing more about this soon.
I'd say that perhaps the most fundamental insight of an intelligent person is that a society's long existing practices are culturally evolved and exist because ... they work.
And, of course, the corollary: breaking them for your new fangled "great idea" is almost certainly doing to "not work"--and quite likely be a disaster.Replies: @Erik L, @Hypnotoad666, @kaganovitch, @dcthrowback, @Anonymous, @mc23, @Bardon Kaldian, @Almost Missouri
Agree.
Also would like to point out for the “every single time” crowd– Robert Heinlein, not a Jew.
the Hedonism resort in Negril sounds great until you’re an 18 year old lad sitting on the beach chair and a sun dried 65 year old female British/French tourist is wandering in front of you with her tiny shriveled tits wrinkled up. not sexy at all and not a paradise in that moment. in fact no nudist hippy colonies are sexy, because statistically speaking the girls that go to them aren’t hotties. it seems nudist events attract the grossest and most depraved people. hotties don’t do nudist events, only the hideously unwashed do.
The reason why nudism hasn't really taken off is that Americans are prudes at their very core. A nude scene in a movie will cause a movie to receive a more-strict rating than it normally would, while a scene containing violence or blood or other gore will receive a shrug from the ratings board. In addition, most people are quite uncomfortable with the mixture of children and nudity, even in a non-sexual context. My English-teacher friends tell me that they must censor Romeo and Juliet (Zeffirelli 1968) because of its brief topless scene but when I was in school we watched it without any issue.
In Blame It on Rio (Donen 1984) Michael Caine and Joseph Bologna decide to go to a topless beach where of course they run into their daughters Demi Moore and Michelle Johnson. Moore's straight long black hair was placed perfectly to cover her areola but Johnson was more of a trooper and was truly topless in the movie. Also, despite the physical similarity between Bologna and Moore the father/daughter casting is switched for reasons of plot.Replies: @Mr. Anon, @Sam Hildebrand, @prosa123, @Almost Missouri, @rushed boob job, @James J. O'Meara, @J.Ross, @Crawfurdmuir, @Reg Cæsar, @Twinkie, @Grey cat, @Rich
Also saw that in US high school English class in the ’80s without issue . . . except that the movie had to be watched over two days because it was too long for one class session, so when on the second day the English teacher duly fast-forwarded past Olivia Hussey’s breasts from the first half, there were loud groans and jeers from the class.
Just like shirtless (male) bathing suit exposure or bikini wearing. Only more so.
There are somewhat effective sunscreen lotions but only short term effective.
Sun exposure can really age your skin and models and skin aware celebrities (men and women) are careful to cover their faces and arms, not expose them.
I have seen the negative effects of this on a woman I knew long ago from up north who loved to tan. I live in a southern latitude and everyone we knew warned her about her incessant tanning.
Some years ago, after about a 30 year gap, I happened to see her in a store. She was younger than me but looked much older, shockingly so. Really had ruined her skin.
I'm sure hard core nudists are aware of the dangers. Outdoors, with wind, sand, bugs, etc. not a great long term practice, Though some Vit D benefit.
People in southern latitudes (especially women) usually cover up head to toe, with large hats/scarves. Refined women prior to the mid 20th century always covered up carefully, to preserve their younger skin look.
I think "nudism" as a sexual titillation is very short term. Like eating too much ice cream, the buzz quickly wears off. The imagination is stronger than the reality.
How many people over say, 25, look good naked? The visual appeal thing is mainly a male trait anyway. If women cared much about male looks in humans, we'd never have made it as a species.Replies: @YetAnotherAnon, @James J. O'Meara, @Hypnotoad666
“Refined women prior to the mid 20th century always covered up carefully, to preserve their younger skin look.”
Before around 1930, a tan meant that you worked in the fields, so women covered up. Indeed women who DID work in the fields took the most care – long sleeves, high necks, huge bonnets.

Post-WW2, a tan meant you could afford air travel somewhere hot, so tans became fashionable.
There are indeed quite a few casualties whose frequent trips to Greece and Spain in youth are now reflected in ruined necks and chests. Sad!
I get the impression the pendulum is swinging back to pale. Using tanning beds is stereotypically chavvy (or whatever the current term is).
I forget which comedienne said that tanning was a waste of time “because men are only interested in the pale bits“.
The reason why nudism hasn't really taken off is that Americans are prudes at their very core. A nude scene in a movie will cause a movie to receive a more-strict rating than it normally would, while a scene containing violence or blood or other gore will receive a shrug from the ratings board. In addition, most people are quite uncomfortable with the mixture of children and nudity, even in a non-sexual context. My English-teacher friends tell me that they must censor Romeo and Juliet (Zeffirelli 1968) because of its brief topless scene but when I was in school we watched it without any issue.
In Blame It on Rio (Donen 1984) Michael Caine and Joseph Bologna decide to go to a topless beach where of course they run into their daughters Demi Moore and Michelle Johnson. Moore's straight long black hair was placed perfectly to cover her areola but Johnson was more of a trooper and was truly topless in the movie. Also, despite the physical similarity between Bologna and Moore the father/daughter casting is switched for reasons of plot.Replies: @Mr. Anon, @Sam Hildebrand, @prosa123, @Almost Missouri, @rushed boob job, @James J. O'Meara, @J.Ross, @Crawfurdmuir, @Reg Cæsar, @Twinkie, @Grey cat, @Rich
oh man what a hit! freshman year lit class, filled with dudes not interested in romeo, but kinda into juliet. still a snoozer movie. but then, the hottie rolls over and her tits popped out! OHHHHHHHHHHH YAAA OHHH! the crowd goes wild! the cool old teacher laughs and blushes. such a good all-american moment. the bell soon rang and we walked out and thought nothing more about it. we aren’t puritans.
i wonder if that movie is allowed today at schools or would it offend the mean fat girls?
Perhaps not legally. I believe the actress was 14 or thereabouts, you hebes.
The reason why nudism hasn't really taken off is that Americans are prudes at their very core. A nude scene in a movie will cause a movie to receive a more-strict rating than it normally would, while a scene containing violence or blood or other gore will receive a shrug from the ratings board. In addition, most people are quite uncomfortable with the mixture of children and nudity, even in a non-sexual context. My English-teacher friends tell me that they must censor Romeo and Juliet (Zeffirelli 1968) because of its brief topless scene but when I was in school we watched it without any issue.
In Blame It on Rio (Donen 1984) Michael Caine and Joseph Bologna decide to go to a topless beach where of course they run into their daughters Demi Moore and Michelle Johnson. Moore's straight long black hair was placed perfectly to cover her areola but Johnson was more of a trooper and was truly topless in the movie. Also, despite the physical similarity between Bologna and Moore the father/daughter casting is switched for reasons of plot.Replies: @Mr. Anon, @Sam Hildebrand, @prosa123, @Almost Missouri, @rushed boob job, @James J. O'Meara, @J.Ross, @Crawfurdmuir, @Reg Cæsar, @Twinkie, @Grey cat, @Rich
Bingo. Throw in BD/SM enthusiasts as well. In all three cases the “kink” is flaunted to compensate for the lack of attractiveness. It’s almost a tautology: to be “attractive” MEANS to be such as only needing to use the normal, accepted methods to find a mate.
“Sexologists” tell us that fetishist are usually men, and my theory is that women “pretend an interest” (to use a phrase William Burroughs liked) so as to nab a mate. It’s just a more extreme version of using makeup, dieting, exercise, etc. After the ring is applied, it may or may not continue to be employed.
A friend once took me to visit the “legendary” Hellfire Club in NYC and this scene from Sunny exactly captures the experience, right down to the catering. Except the locale was admittedly historically interesting, not the Philly tenement in the clip.
“You can’t tell under the mask.”
Just like shirtless (male) bathing suit exposure or bikini wearing. Only more so.
There are somewhat effective sunscreen lotions but only short term effective.
Sun exposure can really age your skin and models and skin aware celebrities (men and women) are careful to cover their faces and arms, not expose them.
I have seen the negative effects of this on a woman I knew long ago from up north who loved to tan. I live in a southern latitude and everyone we knew warned her about her incessant tanning.
Some years ago, after about a 30 year gap, I happened to see her in a store. She was younger than me but looked much older, shockingly so. Really had ruined her skin.
I'm sure hard core nudists are aware of the dangers. Outdoors, with wind, sand, bugs, etc. not a great long term practice, Though some Vit D benefit.
People in southern latitudes (especially women) usually cover up head to toe, with large hats/scarves. Refined women prior to the mid 20th century always covered up carefully, to preserve their younger skin look.
I think "nudism" as a sexual titillation is very short term. Like eating too much ice cream, the buzz quickly wears off. The imagination is stronger than the reality.
How many people over say, 25, look good naked? The visual appeal thing is mainly a male trait anyway. If women cared much about male looks in humans, we'd never have made it as a species.Replies: @YetAnotherAnon, @James J. O'Meara, @Hypnotoad666
Both points made in Seinfeld episodes, both by Elaine, in fact.
In the Hamptons episode, Elaine is sunbathing with a big hat and veil, to protect her youthful skin.
An entire episode was devoted to Jerry’s new girlfriend, who prances around his apartment naked. At first he’s delighted, but quickly becomes squeamish as she performs such actions as struggling to open a pickle jar. Discussing this in the coffee shop, Elaine insists that only male nudity is problematic: “The female body is a work of art. The male body is utilitarian, just for getting around, like a jeep.”
No opportunity for sanctimony, aka virtue signaling [sic]. If someone can invent a reason that nudity is virtuous, then it will join the Progressive Stack. Viz, nudity improves the weather, nudity cures covid, nudity eradicates/annoys europeans, nudity annoys/eradicates Christians, nudity annoys republicans, etc.
OT — [through drywall] Steve! Steeve! Today on NPR Fresh Air‘s Terri Gross will host O-Ren Ishi, host of the podcast White Straight American Jesus, as he discusses “Christian Nationalism” and its connections to Donald Trump, January Sixth, and six foot tall invisible bunny rabbits. I tried to link something but I guess because it hasn’t aired yet there’s nothing on the site.
https://www.npr.org/programs/fresh-air/
https://www.straightwhiteamericanjesus.com/
O-Ren’s fatuous tome is Preparing for War: The Extremist History of White Christian Nationalism–and What Comes Next, and Amazon says:
The reason why nudism hasn't really taken off is that Americans are prudes at their very core. A nude scene in a movie will cause a movie to receive a more-strict rating than it normally would, while a scene containing violence or blood or other gore will receive a shrug from the ratings board. In addition, most people are quite uncomfortable with the mixture of children and nudity, even in a non-sexual context. My English-teacher friends tell me that they must censor Romeo and Juliet (Zeffirelli 1968) because of its brief topless scene but when I was in school we watched it without any issue.
In Blame It on Rio (Donen 1984) Michael Caine and Joseph Bologna decide to go to a topless beach where of course they run into their daughters Demi Moore and Michelle Johnson. Moore's straight long black hair was placed perfectly to cover her areola but Johnson was more of a trooper and was truly topless in the movie. Also, despite the physical similarity between Bologna and Moore the father/daughter casting is switched for reasons of plot.Replies: @Mr. Anon, @Sam Hildebrand, @prosa123, @Almost Missouri, @rushed boob job, @James J. O'Meara, @J.Ross, @Crawfurdmuir, @Reg Cæsar, @Twinkie, @Grey cat, @Rich
[Princess Bride quote, you hear it inside your head, I don’t even need to specify it]
The Heinlein case is symptomatic, to some extent, because it diagnoses a type of (sexual) behavior & is good for detection of peculiar psychological types. Aside from individual, personal traits, let’s see what is statistically significant.
In my view, polyamory is a life-style suitable for some kind of urban middle class childless population, essentially egocentric liberal types without serious devotion to any goal in life & whose mantra is “freedom from shackles of tradition”. It is a facile & not a sustainable way of life; also, it is very marginal & almost invariably doomed to fail, as stats show- virtually all polyamorous & open marriage arrangements rather quickly collapse. It has nothing to do with polygamy/polygyny, which is a historical, social & economical pattern of marriage- just an “experimental” phase among middle class urban disoriented decadents without children. With children, it becomes complicated & most girls and boys coming from such “families” are damaged for life.
As far as real polygamy- ca. 99% marriages in Arab and similar societies are monogamous. Polygamy is more present, 15% to 30% among some Muslim African societies, but blacks are a race apart from other races, so polygamy among Caucasians and Asians is in reality extremely limited.
So far as the “jealousy” meme goes- it is astonishing that so many proponents of alternative sexual life-styles are so obsessed with it & consider this normal human emotion something to be eradicated. Sexual jealousy is a healthy sign of a true & authentic erotic love. Those who are almost ideologically committed to elimination of jealousy are mentally deranged people, probably encumbered with some hardly explicable pathologies.
Heinlein was, from what I know about his position on these matters, a typical rebellious spirit whose central motif in life was freedom & who was stranger to passions, family & deeper normal rhythms of life. He liked to play games, speculate, probe uncharted territories, explore erotic novelties… but he was shallow, psychologically infantile & definitely not a material for a strong & flourishing society.
Plato, Aristotle, Shakespeare, Lawrence, Dostoevsky & Freud would have dismissed him as an archetype of vitalist & intellectually curious infantilism.
As I said above, "Jealousy is our genes yelling “We matter!” You care about things that matter to you. The genes of people who don't care about their reproduction, won't be around very long. Confess, I don't know much about Heinlein. I read science fiction when I was an adolescent, then grew out of it. Someone told me I should read the "Stranger in a Strange Land"--that's the "grok" thingy--when I was late HS or college age. Yawn. (Maybe I read the "Moon" thing too--not sure.)
But you paragraphs above are sort of my take. There's just a lot of nonsense from many smart, but somehow "just don't get it" people that wanders off into the weeds, just misses understanding of actual human experience.
Yeah, I’m not sure why “indecent exposure” is still a thing these days. People who march in gay parades are exempt from it. What about all the guys out there who identify as flashers? What’s the rationale for telling them they can’t be their authentic selves?
great article about Heinlein. Starting with Stranger, most of his novels are trash. But “Friday” is really good — he’s back in top form.
https://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/washington-whispers/2014/08/01/biden-swims-naked-upsetting-female-secret-service-agents-book-claims
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-13141597/Bradley-Cooper-totally-fine-walking-naked-home-father-nude-house-adds-used-shower-dad.html
Is this really true? My gut says that it is but had the number of nude beaches and nudist resorts actually gone down? Are there stats for this?
I’ve heard that going topless on beaches is associated by young French girls today with their mother’s generation and of course you don’t want to be like your parents. If “Blame it on Rio” was filmed today, the girls would be the ones covered up and embarrassed by their topless saggy parents.
Of course an increasing % of “French” girls wear burqas – the trend is in the other direction.
Well, this question cannot be answered until “they” have researched which way the majority of nudists vote.
Be sure to click through and read about the poor man in St. Johnsbury Vt. who suffers from the naked woman fetish. Who knew the Babylon Bee had taken over the local paper.
Neither a nitty nor a gritty be. Keep dancing around the fact that most religions at their founding, the standard big ones as well as Scientology, Nation of Islam and Charlie Manson (three sides of the same imaginary demonic coin) simply schemes to ensconce the leaders in an endless-supply-of-underage-poonanny-and-we’ll-pay-your-bills-and-expenses lifestyle.
This happens on the micro level as well. It’s a safe bet that Heinlein did not always check IDs. My own supposition is that he had quite a vigorous policy of aggressively not checking IDs. On the bright side, unlike the typical Poly-Ammonite, he was not fat. In a tradition where Lot’s daughters said “Come let us make our father drunk with wine so he will lay with us” and then Lot’s daughters made their father drunk with wine and lo he went into them and he knew them Heinlein is squarely astride the tradition. The clear implication of Time Enough For Love is that Lazarus Long has sex with his daughters who are actually his clones.
As Ashley Biden’s diary teaches us the current occupant of the Flowers For Algernon Dementia Ward at 1600 Pennsylvania likes to show his penis to people just like LBJ as detailed in Sylvia Choksondik’s upcoming Get That Thing Away From Me: Life on the Presidential Detail.
In Tolkien’s Middle Earth Legendarium Turin the first human engages in incest with his sister. Tradition is a funny thing.
The Japanese creation myths…
(looks at Dream of the Fisherman’s Wife)
…OK. You’re right.
Whatever his merits as an author, Heinlein was fundamentally a dirty old man, a fact I gathered when I was reading his stuff as a very young man.
“… he also had what The Onion in its 1998 prime called a Naked-Lady Fetish.”
A bit like Patrick Stewart then. (Extras)
I've heard that going topless on beaches is associated by young French girls today with their mother's generation and of course you don't want to be like your parents. If "Blame it on Rio" was filmed today, the girls would be the ones covered up and embarrassed by their topless saggy parents.
Of course an increasing % of "French" girls wear burqas - the trend is in the other direction.Replies: @Dutch Boy, @Chebyshev, @Twinkie, @Harry Baldwin
The greatest argument against nudism is aesthetic: the deplorable physique of the typical human. That goes double for the contemporary American people. They are giving obesity a bad name.
Nekkid women! What was he, like permanently 13?
Gotta say though, getting up to speed
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Puppet_Masters#Plot
It really is too damn bad we don’t/didn’t have such an easy method for identifying our alien slugs and alien slug infected. (The yard signs were quite helpful a few years back.) Imagine our alien slugs had had such a straightforward–and repulsive–visual marker. We could have–and would have–made war on them, killed them and stopped the infection many decades ago and never have gotten to where we are.
Now, of course, our establishment has been taken over by the alien slugs and our future–the future of the West–looks quite dire.
Yes. Lafayette Hubbard claimed to have cucked him while he watched, and if you've read any Heinlein you will see that as very possible (Hubbard also claimed to be able to talk to plants). They did live together at one point.
I've heard that going topless on beaches is associated by young French girls today with their mother's generation and of course you don't want to be like your parents. If "Blame it on Rio" was filmed today, the girls would be the ones covered up and embarrassed by their topless saggy parents.
Of course an increasing % of "French" girls wear burqas - the trend is in the other direction.Replies: @Dutch Boy, @Chebyshev, @Twinkie, @Harry Baldwin
I think nude beaches are as common as ever, and their number has most likely even increased recently. The weather has been unusually warm in recent years, and more and more people are moving to Florida and other Southeastern and Gulf states with large beachfronts. The long term trend with clothing in America is to wear less and less of it – a century ago everyone wore tuxedos and elaborate dresses, whereas now, normal attire includes tank tops, shorts, and flip-flops. Surely wearing one’s birthday suit around the back yard and at other events has become more common than ever, and thus, nude beaches are even more numerous than they were in the past.
The physicist Richard Feynman enjoyed the LA strip club scene. Of course he only went for the orange juice and intellectual stimulation.
“Sometimes Richard would suddenly say, ‘Let’s knock off and go somewhere and fool around!’ The usual place we went was a topless bar in Pasadena, called Gianone’s. There was always something happening at Gianone’s in the afternoon, every day of the week. We’d walk in, grab a table. Feynman knew everybody there—all the ladies; Gianone, the owner; and anybody who was a regular. He would go behind the bar and pick up an orange juice, because he never drank anything alcoholic. He would also grab a half-inch stack of those paper doilies, or place mats that they put down on tables in restaurants, and come back to the table. We might continue doing physics, or we might watch the ladies dancing on the stage. Frequently people would come by and chat, and this was the sort of entertainment that he liked. But it was kind of deceptive because, believe it or not, although this particular environment might not seem conducive to doing something like theoretical physics, over the years, Feynman actually did an enormous number of calculations in that place.”
https://www.plannedman.com/the-means/work/part-two-feynman-strip-clubs-and-the-nobel-prize-as-a-performance-enhancing-drug/
If, on the other hand, you can write like Heinlein, you’ll be a rich man.
Nudism used to be very popular in Germany (especially East Germany), and young women were often topless even at swimming pools. This openness seems to have unfortunately disappeared. Open question whether the change is due to discomfort with Muslim men leering at them, idiots with camera phones or, I suspect, the combination of the two.
Nudism can function ok in sort of "one-peopleish" places with high-trust norms. As you leave Europe and move toward low-trust tribal, Semitic, West-Asian cultures ... The women aren't there to be strippers for "men with gold chains" types leering at that them.2) nudism is an "in the moment thing"
I.e. people comfortable being naked in this place, at this time. Having some a*hole taking pictures of your naked body for their "private enjoyment"--or posting them on the Internet--is not desired.
I'm not interested in nudism and don't count its destruction as a great loss. But nudism is yet another high-trust thing being wrecked by these genocidal immigration zealots trashing of high-trust white nations.
I enjoy naked ladies as much as the next guy, but there's this thing called selectivity.
Some things are best appreciated in private. Take fine wines, for example...Replies: @notbe mk 2, @Corpse Tooth, @Twinkie
Ahh the concept of watching women on a nudist beach… but truth be told, young American women of contemporary times are simply wrapped up in celluloid and full of blue black tats (and let’s not mention the nauseous piercings which pierce…well everywhere), nothing like the California cuties of that idiot, TB spreading, perv Heinlein active years Lets face it we just can’t have nice things in anything anymore…we live in sad times Perhaps, like a philosopher in the seventies once said; “one day a rain will come and wash everything away” but that’s unlikely
I'd say that perhaps the most fundamental insight of an intelligent person is that a society's long existing practices are culturally evolved and exist because ... they work.
And, of course, the corollary: breaking them for your new fangled "great idea" is almost certainly doing to "not work"--and quite likely be a disaster.Replies: @Erik L, @Hypnotoad666, @kaganovitch, @dcthrowback, @Anonymous, @mc23, @Bardon Kaldian, @Almost Missouri
In fairness, there is nothing wrong with floating crazy, non-conformist scenarios, especially in creative art. Heck, they don’t call it science fiction for nothing. Whether these ideas catch on or get elevated to political programs by “serious” policy people isn’t really the fault of the artist.
OTOH, I suppose there is a natural bias for “intellectuals” to sneer at normie culture. It wouldn’t make the intellectual look very important or interesting to just say: “conventional wisdom seems about right, I don’t see any important issue to talk about here.”
Just like shirtless (male) bathing suit exposure or bikini wearing. Only more so.
There are somewhat effective sunscreen lotions but only short term effective.
Sun exposure can really age your skin and models and skin aware celebrities (men and women) are careful to cover their faces and arms, not expose them.
I have seen the negative effects of this on a woman I knew long ago from up north who loved to tan. I live in a southern latitude and everyone we knew warned her about her incessant tanning.
Some years ago, after about a 30 year gap, I happened to see her in a store. She was younger than me but looked much older, shockingly so. Really had ruined her skin.
I'm sure hard core nudists are aware of the dangers. Outdoors, with wind, sand, bugs, etc. not a great long term practice, Though some Vit D benefit.
People in southern latitudes (especially women) usually cover up head to toe, with large hats/scarves. Refined women prior to the mid 20th century always covered up carefully, to preserve their younger skin look.
I think "nudism" as a sexual titillation is very short term. Like eating too much ice cream, the buzz quickly wears off. The imagination is stronger than the reality.
How many people over say, 25, look good naked? The visual appeal thing is mainly a male trait anyway. If women cared much about male looks in humans, we'd never have made it as a species.Replies: @YetAnotherAnon, @James J. O'Meara, @Hypnotoad666
There are some places you definitely wouldn’t want to get a sunburn at a nude beach. Also, asking someone to help you put sunscreen on could be problematic.
Heinlein’s acquaintance Jack Parsons was a very odd one, by the way. From his wikipedia page: “Unable to pursue his scientific career, without his wife and devoid of friendship, Parsons decided to return to occultism and embarked on sexually based magical operations with prostitutes.” There is plenty more. Plenty more.
Reading JPs and related pages also makes me think he inspired certain parts of Robert Anton Wilson’s Illuminatus!.
(Hitler and his fellows were with some frequency accused of occultism, consider Hell Boy for a recent example, but what was going on at JPL and in California seems to dwarf that.)
With the advent of family Facebook pages, Instagram, and other social media, “psychological nudity” has become commonplace, as friends and even strangers gain observations of, and insights into, our private and intimate lives. The revelations of physical nudity are small beer compared with psychological nudity, and so, physical unity has declined in popularity.
I enjoy naked ladies as much as the next guy, but there's this thing called selectivity.
Some things are best appreciated in private. Take fine wines, for example...Replies: @notbe mk 2, @Corpse Tooth, @Twinkie
“Some things are best appreciated in private.”
Most nudities are banal. Perhaps this is your situation. Other’s nudity must be beheld. Sometimes it requires the imposition of nudity to make those who are resistant to my nudity to behold it. Like the Filipino family who live next door.
Why hasn’t nudism become a identity politics identity?
Well,other than Amazon, Walmart, Target, The Gap, Old Navy, etc., getting f*cked royally, it sounds like something the 1% would love, amiright?
I'd say that perhaps the most fundamental insight of an intelligent person is that a society's long existing practices are culturally evolved and exist because ... they work.
And, of course, the corollary: breaking them for your new fangled "great idea" is almost certainly doing to "not work"--and quite likely be a disaster.Replies: @Erik L, @Hypnotoad666, @kaganovitch, @dcthrowback, @Anonymous, @mc23, @Bardon Kaldian, @Almost Missouri
Indeed, this is more or less Hayek’s central insight.
Like most SF writers, Heinlein can’t write. Nothing but wooden characters and cliche-ridden prose.
The reason why nudism hasn't really taken off is that Americans are prudes at their very core. A nude scene in a movie will cause a movie to receive a more-strict rating than it normally would, while a scene containing violence or blood or other gore will receive a shrug from the ratings board. In addition, most people are quite uncomfortable with the mixture of children and nudity, even in a non-sexual context. My English-teacher friends tell me that they must censor Romeo and Juliet (Zeffirelli 1968) because of its brief topless scene but when I was in school we watched it without any issue.
In Blame It on Rio (Donen 1984) Michael Caine and Joseph Bologna decide to go to a topless beach where of course they run into their daughters Demi Moore and Michelle Johnson. Moore's straight long black hair was placed perfectly to cover her areola but Johnson was more of a trooper and was truly topless in the movie. Also, despite the physical similarity between Bologna and Moore the father/daughter casting is switched for reasons of plot.Replies: @Mr. Anon, @Sam Hildebrand, @prosa123, @Almost Missouri, @rushed boob job, @James J. O'Meara, @J.Ross, @Crawfurdmuir, @Reg Cæsar, @Twinkie, @Grey cat, @Rich
No – more likely the reason nudism isn’t more popular is that most people look better with their clothes on.
The earliest nudists, in Germany (where else?), were quite prudish in many ways. Exercise buffs, vegetarians, proto-eco-freaks. Some may even have been teetotalers, which is quite extreme for Germans.
A 1929 farce by a British (who else?) playwright teased their attitudes, while mocking his own countrymen's prudery in the process:
https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/51MPAlp97hL._SY445_SX342_.jpg
Barely Memorable
Gotta say though, getting up to speed
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Puppet_Masters#Plot
It really is too damn bad we don't/didn't have such an easy method for identifying our alien slugs and alien slug infected. (The yard signs were quite helpful a few years back.) Imagine our alien slugs had had such a straightforward--and repulsive--visual marker. We could have--and would have--made war on them, killed them and stopped the infection many decades ago and never have gotten to where we are.
Now, of course, our establishment has been taken over by the alien slugs and our future--the future of the West--looks quite dire.Replies: @J.Ross
What was he, like permanently 13?
Yes. Lafayette Hubbard claimed to have cucked him while he watched, and if you’ve read any Heinlein you will see that as very possible (Hubbard also claimed to be able to talk to plants). They did live together at one point.
Interestingly enough just to get off on the L Ron Hubbard tangent, Jack Parsons was indeed a handsome devil (yes he looked like Hollywood’s version of a sexy Lucifer) and yes he was a Satanist (technically a Thelemist) but he made that one mistake-he befriended Elron
It ended up with Elron stealing Jack’s life savings and Jack’s beautiful open marriage wife who helped Elron in this Having one’s partner run away with another man happens especially if you stupidly advocate open marriages (like always this is something that Rob Heinlein never really thought through) but stealing money was back then and still is a criminal act
The hilarious thing is that we have correspondence between Parsons and Aleister Crowley where Al specifically warns Jack about the need to not trust Elron
Now seriously, how absolutely immoral do you have to be that the world’s top Satanist warns people not to trust you? Think about it-the Beast 666 goes out of his way to help people because he sees that you are…evil Seriously, Elron was psychopathically evil from the very beginning
-and remember all this happened BEFORE Elron founded you know what
The reason why nudism hasn't really taken off is that Americans are prudes at their very core. A nude scene in a movie will cause a movie to receive a more-strict rating than it normally would, while a scene containing violence or blood or other gore will receive a shrug from the ratings board. In addition, most people are quite uncomfortable with the mixture of children and nudity, even in a non-sexual context. My English-teacher friends tell me that they must censor Romeo and Juliet (Zeffirelli 1968) because of its brief topless scene but when I was in school we watched it without any issue.
In Blame It on Rio (Donen 1984) Michael Caine and Joseph Bologna decide to go to a topless beach where of course they run into their daughters Demi Moore and Michelle Johnson. Moore's straight long black hair was placed perfectly to cover her areola but Johnson was more of a trooper and was truly topless in the movie. Also, despite the physical similarity between Bologna and Moore the father/daughter casting is switched for reasons of plot.Replies: @Mr. Anon, @Sam Hildebrand, @prosa123, @Almost Missouri, @rushed boob job, @James J. O'Meara, @J.Ross, @Crawfurdmuir, @Reg Cæsar, @Twinkie, @Grey cat, @Rich
Trouper. That idiom has its roots on the stage, not in the squad car. As in “the show must go on”.
Trouper vs. Trooper
Trouper vs. Trooper – Meaning, Difference & Examples
Yet another example of many homophonic “smart people’s errors”. The unlettered often don’t know these phrases at all.
And bottomless, in one brief shot. She was 17 at the time. Good thing the state they chose to film in was not New York or California, with their strict protections for underage actors, but Rio de Janeiro. The shot itself was in a grey area between innocent and “sexualized”, and the actress on the cusp of adulthood, so there wasn’t much of a fuss.
Fastidiousness was not a hallmark of this production. The story bounced back and forth between São Paulo (“where the work is done”) and Rio (“where the fun is done”). To illustrate such travel, they used a stock clip of a Varig jumbo jet. For what was the equivalent of the Trump Shuttle! C’mon, guys… Trump used 727s, not 747s, and that Varig was on its way to Lisbon.
At Rotten Tomatoes, the movie has a critic's approval rating of 7% and an audience approval score of 40%. Any movie that is 4x or more more popular with audiences than with critics is a sure winner in my book. That means that the movie is actually entertaining trash, which this movie is. The movie equivalent of junk food. Do you check inside your McDonald's hamburger to see if the pickle slices are authentic French cornichons produced in the Champagne region?
Michelle Johnson was not much of an actress (she was a fashion model and the director picked her out of a magazine ad without hearing her speak a word) but at (or almost at) 18 she was very easy on the eyes wearing only a bikini bottom (or even less ). Once she hit the Wall her acting career ground to a complete halt.Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @ScarletNumber
This is the AI age. Don’t be so quick to count out nudism.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2024/feb/28/beverly-hills-middle-schoolers-use-ai-make-nudes-c/?utm_campaign=shareaholic&utm_medium=twitter&utm_source=socialnetwork
A tradition of verbosity which most readers find exasperating and pedantic.
The selling point of nudism, especially Twentieth century German nudism, was quackery. It was supposed to enable health benefits. The health benefits of nudism are a checkable criterion and I’m guessing that there aren’t any worth undoing social mores.
OT:
Heinlein would certainly be canceled by the woke ninnies that run sci-fi these days, since two of his three legs (militarism and libertarianism) are a bridge too far for those who like the freaky stuff sexually. Heinlein struck me mostly as a guy who would try anything and didn’t like strict definitions, so more of a free love dude, whereas the new trans and GLBT/LMNOP-Puritans have a rather rigid moralism to their whole system, even when it is undefinable and impossible to fully explain or understand.
Trouper vs. Trooper
Trouper vs. Trooper – Meaning, Difference & ExamplesYet another example of many homophonic "smart people's errors". The unlettered often don't know these phrases at all. And bottomless, in one brief shot. She was 17 at the time. Good thing the state they chose to film in was not New York or California, with their strict protections for underage actors, but Rio de Janeiro. The shot itself was in a grey area between innocent and "sexualized", and the actress on the cusp of adulthood, so there wasn't much of a fuss. Fastidiousness was not a hallmark of this production. The story bounced back and forth between São Paulo ("where the work is done") and Rio ("where the fun is done"). To illustrate such travel, they used a stock clip of a Varig jumbo jet. For what was the equivalent of the Trump Shuttle! C'mon, guys... Trump used 727s, not 747s, and that Varig was on its way to Lisbon.Replies: @Jack D, @SafeNow
C’mon, they were doing a sex comedy, not a documentary. Who cares whether they used the correct stock footage of an airplane flying from one city to another? “The correct Varig logo has a robin’s egg blue background and in the movie the background of the logo was navy blue. Real Varig pilots wear shoulder epaulettes with 4 gold stripes. In the movie, the epaulettes only had 3 gold stripes. ” Who GAF? Fast forward to the scenes where Demi and Michelle (especially Michelle – Demi didn’t get her breast implants until years later) are topless on the beach.
At Rotten Tomatoes, the movie has a critic’s approval rating of 7% and an audience approval score of 40%. Any movie that is 4x or more more popular with audiences than with critics is a sure winner in my book. That means that the movie is actually entertaining trash, which this movie is. The movie equivalent of junk food. Do you check inside your McDonald’s hamburger to see if the pickle slices are authentic French cornichons produced in the Champagne region?
Michelle Johnson was not much of an actress (she was a fashion model and the director picked her out of a magazine ad without hearing her speak a word) but at (or almost at) 18 she was very easy on the eyes wearing only a bikini bottom (or even less ). Once she hit the Wall her acting career ground to a complete halt.
It's not that it was wrong, it's that it was screamingly obviously wrong. How hard was it, even before Tim Berners-Lee, to contact the airline and ask which particular craft they used on the route, and order shot of that one?
Brits and Yanks know little about the geography of South America. But a shot of a 747 or A380 connecting London and Liverpool, or Newark and Boston or Dulles, would be noticed by the laziest one-flick-a-year stockbroker in the audience. Today such a gaffe would be all over social media. Replies: @Stan Adams, @Jack D
*Baseball ReferenceReplies: @Reg Cæsar
This same commenter recently asserted that any man who says he preferred Bailey to Jennifer on WKRP was just “virtue signalling”. As if tastes don’t vary.
The earliest nudists, in Germany (where else?), were quite prudish in many ways. Exercise buffs, vegetarians, proto-eco-freaks. Some may even have been teetotalers, which is quite extreme for Germans.
A 1929 farce by a British (who else?) playwright teased their attitudes, while mocking his own countrymen’s prudery in the process:
Barely Memorable
I enjoy naked ladies as much as the next guy, but there's this thing called selectivity.
Some things are best appreciated in private. Take fine wines, for example...Replies: @notbe mk 2, @Corpse Tooth, @Twinkie
I still remember going to a European beach with topless women for the first time decades ago. I was expecting beautiful women like in a movie, but to my horror, it was mostly older women and men with all that entails. Totally not what I was hoping.
Today in America? It’d be even worse. It’d be a parade of morbidly obese, tattooed bodies.
It was a bizarre meeting of East and West: youth and beauty artificially heightened and hardened to absurd curiosity vs. the husks of superannuated decadence.
The large, fat, and older husbands of the former lasciviously groped them in the surf, while the similarly aged but less corpulent husbands of the latter lounged indifferently in the sand reading newspapers and smoking cigarettes.
Could I have looked into the future, I might have said that each group maintained its posture as they transitioned into geopolitical confrontation with each other.
I've heard that going topless on beaches is associated by young French girls today with their mother's generation and of course you don't want to be like your parents. If "Blame it on Rio" was filmed today, the girls would be the ones covered up and embarrassed by their topless saggy parents.
Of course an increasing % of "French" girls wear burqas - the trend is in the other direction.Replies: @Dutch Boy, @Chebyshev, @Twinkie, @Harry Baldwin
It’s true. Even in Sweden and other parts of Europe where nudity is far more practiced, the younger people will cover up more in saunas and beaches while the older ones will let it all hang.
The reason why nudism hasn't really taken off is that Americans are prudes at their very core. A nude scene in a movie will cause a movie to receive a more-strict rating than it normally would, while a scene containing violence or blood or other gore will receive a shrug from the ratings board. In addition, most people are quite uncomfortable with the mixture of children and nudity, even in a non-sexual context. My English-teacher friends tell me that they must censor Romeo and Juliet (Zeffirelli 1968) because of its brief topless scene but when I was in school we watched it without any issue.
In Blame It on Rio (Donen 1984) Michael Caine and Joseph Bologna decide to go to a topless beach where of course they run into their daughters Demi Moore and Michelle Johnson. Moore's straight long black hair was placed perfectly to cover her areola but Johnson was more of a trooper and was truly topless in the movie. Also, despite the physical similarity between Bologna and Moore the father/daughter casting is switched for reasons of plot.Replies: @Mr. Anon, @Sam Hildebrand, @prosa123, @Almost Missouri, @rushed boob job, @James J. O'Meara, @J.Ross, @Crawfurdmuir, @Reg Cæsar, @Twinkie, @Grey cat, @Rich
I am pretty sure Demi Moore was topless in the movie and you could see it all though there wasn’t much to look at as she was rather small. Michelle Johnson was a different story. 😉
OT — But delightfully iStevey — So the NFL got rid of the Wonderlic, what’s the worst that could happ —
https://bleacherreport.com/articles/10111148-nfl-draft-prospect-tyler-owens-says-he-doesnt-believe-in-space-and-other-planets
https://twitter.com/CensoredMen/status/1763216777264144873/video/1
https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/1763279095318679791
I wonder if it’s for similar reasons we no longer have open showers in high school. At least in my area they either have shower stalls or don’t shower at all.
I wonder how much of it is because people value personal privacy even more now that "there is no such a thing as privacy" or because everyone has mobile phones. Or perhaps because of the "rise" of open homosexuality and even transgenderism.
I also think of about whether this is now tied to kids not playing outside together without adult supervision like in the old days and it's all supervised playdates (and no sleepovers either).Replies: @TWS
The reason why nudism hasn't really taken off is that Americans are prudes at their very core. A nude scene in a movie will cause a movie to receive a more-strict rating than it normally would, while a scene containing violence or blood or other gore will receive a shrug from the ratings board. In addition, most people are quite uncomfortable with the mixture of children and nudity, even in a non-sexual context. My English-teacher friends tell me that they must censor Romeo and Juliet (Zeffirelli 1968) because of its brief topless scene but when I was in school we watched it without any issue.
In Blame It on Rio (Donen 1984) Michael Caine and Joseph Bologna decide to go to a topless beach where of course they run into their daughters Demi Moore and Michelle Johnson. Moore's straight long black hair was placed perfectly to cover her areola but Johnson was more of a trooper and was truly topless in the movie. Also, despite the physical similarity between Bologna and Moore the father/daughter casting is switched for reasons of plot.Replies: @Mr. Anon, @Sam Hildebrand, @prosa123, @Almost Missouri, @rushed boob job, @James J. O'Meara, @J.Ross, @Crawfurdmuir, @Reg Cæsar, @Twinkie, @Grey cat, @Rich
My fellow mom friends were all horrified that we took our kids to a traditional onsen in Japan. “How could you let your kids be naked in public? What about weirdos??” The baths are sex segregated and filled with families, many go as often as once a week and eat dinner there. I asked my Japanese BIL if anything untoward ever happened on the Men’s side and he was aghast. “The other men would not stand for that.”
I am by far the most conservative mom in my neighborhood and am fine with this sort of thing but only let my kids consume media from before the Awokening and keep them off the internet.
OT — Follow-up to earlier comment still in moderation — Here is the interview by Terri Gross on NPR’s Fresh Air of former evangelical preacher turned Nazi-finder O-Ren Ishi. Ishi is biracial and illustrates the iSteve pattern of biracial people sometimes tending to decide they like one half better and the other half needs to apologize for existing even though it’s not a race to begin with plus it’s suspended in mixture. More details on O-Ren Ishi in the other comment.
https://www.npr.org/2024/02/29/1234843874/tracing-the-rise-of-christian-nationalism-from-trump-to-the-ala-supreme-court
Moore was topless but with her hair strategically placed covering her areolae; Johnson let the puppies breathe with full force.
I like at least a little left to the imagination.
Trouper vs. Trooper
Trouper vs. Trooper – Meaning, Difference & ExamplesYet another example of many homophonic "smart people's errors". The unlettered often don't know these phrases at all. And bottomless, in one brief shot. She was 17 at the time. Good thing the state they chose to film in was not New York or California, with their strict protections for underage actors, but Rio de Janeiro. The shot itself was in a grey area between innocent and "sexualized", and the actress on the cusp of adulthood, so there wasn't much of a fuss. Fastidiousness was not a hallmark of this production. The story bounced back and forth between São Paulo ("where the work is done") and Rio ("where the fun is done"). To illustrate such travel, they used a stock clip of a Varig jumbo jet. For what was the equivalent of the Trump Shuttle! C'mon, guys... Trump used 727s, not 747s, and that Varig was on its way to Lisbon.Replies: @Jack D, @SafeNow
Thanks for correcting the commenter’s grammatical error. (Although I hear rumors that when we are all in the internment reeducation center, the food will be worse in the correct-grammar section, to punish and deprogram us, because Republicans are supposed to be stupid.) However, a suggestion: Do not use “reply” to specify the source of the solecism; merely note the solecism in the box; most people will not bother to scroll-up and locate the culprit. Thanks.
Post-Cerebral Hemorrhage Heinlein Novels Ranked:
1. Friday
2. Job: A Comedy of Justice
3. The Cat Who Could Walk Through Walls (Solid first 2/3rds, then slips into solipsism)
4. To Sail Beyond The Sunset (Ditto)
5. Time Enough for Love (Uneven. “The Tale of the Adopted Daughter” might be his best overall)
6. I Will Fear No Evil
.
.
.
.
.
Last – Number of the Beast/Pursuit of Pankera
If your woman isn’t jealous then she doesn’t find you that attractive.
At Rotten Tomatoes, the movie has a critic's approval rating of 7% and an audience approval score of 40%. Any movie that is 4x or more more popular with audiences than with critics is a sure winner in my book. That means that the movie is actually entertaining trash, which this movie is. The movie equivalent of junk food. Do you check inside your McDonald's hamburger to see if the pickle slices are authentic French cornichons produced in the Champagne region?
Michelle Johnson was not much of an actress (she was a fashion model and the director picked her out of a magazine ad without hearing her speak a word) but at (or almost at) 18 she was very easy on the eyes wearing only a bikini bottom (or even less ). Once she hit the Wall her acting career ground to a complete halt.Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @ScarletNumber
Who would care if they showed Lubavitchers feasting on boar at a luau on Oahu? Or a show about lifeguards in California filmed in New Zealand, with the steering wheel on the starboard side? (I vaguely remember seeing something fitting that description years ago.)
It’s not that it was wrong, it’s that it was screamingly obviously wrong. How hard was it, even before Tim Berners-Lee, to contact the airline and ask which particular craft they used on the route, and order shot of that one?
Brits and Yanks know little about the geography of South America. But a shot of a 747 or A380 connecting London and Liverpool, or Newark and Boston or Dulles, would be noticed by the laziest one-flick-a-year stockbroker in the audience. Today such a gaffe would be all over social media.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y2tCs2cZRQw
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japan_Air_Lines_Flight_123
The cause was a structural failure was caused by a faulty repair by Boeing technicians following a tailstrike incident seven years earlier. When the faulty repair eventually failed, it resulted in a rapid decompression that ripped off a large portion of the tail and caused the loss of all on-board hydraulic systems, disabling the aircraft's flight controls. A contributing factor was the high number of cycles of pressurization/depressurization from the very short flights - 18,800 cycles in 25,000 flight hours. The plane continued flying, but uncontrollably, for another half hour, leaving many passengers time to compose final notes to their loved ones.
It is possible that better, Captain Sully type pilots would have figured some way to make a landing and save at least some lives but the Japanese pilots failed. In the similar United Flight 232 crash, of the 296 people aboard, 184 survived despite the total loss of hydraulics. Another pilot/ flight instructor who was flying as a passenger knew of the earlier crash and had practiced controlling the plane with only engine thrust in a flight simulator and he talked his way into the cockpit.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Airlines_Flight_232Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @Nicholas Stix, @Twinkie, @ThreeCranes, @AceDeuce, @Jim Don Bob
“Why Isn’t “Nudist” an Identity Politics Identity?”
have you seen what people look like naked these days? that’s a bridge too far, even for hardcore leftists. nobody want to see that.
“I never saw the movie you mentioned”
It’s a New York Jew perverted melodrama but with gentile names. Michael Caine is Woody Allen.
Aged 17, I couldn’t get enough of Orff’s Catulli Carmina, and I thought The Importance of Being Earnest was the funniest thing ever.
Coleridge? To this day, he remains as mysterious to me as William Blake. I mean, wtf?
Still the funniest thing on wheels, you're not crazy.
"Coleridge? To this day, he remains as mysterious to me as William Blake. I mean, wtf?"
I hear ya bud, and I get it, but you know... you somehow just never forget your first love. And for me it was Coleridge.
My parents barely graduated high school, but they both had an enduring respect for education, and they had this sort of cargo-cult faith in the magical power of books, no matter what they were about. (My mother taught me to read age four using both the King James Bible and MAD Magazine. And "The Highwayman" by Noyes. And Coleridge.)
Which is to say, they just sort of larded up our house with books of any kind, they didn't even know what was in them: they just went to garage sales and bought arm-loads of books and just left them lying around the house willy-nilly, confident that me and my sibs would just sort of pick them up and read them on our own. Which we did. For me, a typical day's eight-year-old reading was Dr. Seuss, a medical textbook, Don Martin, "Everything You Wanted to Know About Sex", "I Start Counting," and Macbeth.
So, the first book I ever read on my own was not "The Cat in the Hat," it was "The Rime of the Ancient Mariner."
And I had done a grievous thing,
And it would work 'em woe:
For all averred, I had killed the bird
That made the breeze to blow.
You never forget a thing like that.Replies: @Steve Sailer, @res
It's not that it was wrong, it's that it was screamingly obviously wrong. How hard was it, even before Tim Berners-Lee, to contact the airline and ask which particular craft they used on the route, and order shot of that one?
Brits and Yanks know little about the geography of South America. But a shot of a 747 or A380 connecting London and Liverpool, or Newark and Boston or Dulles, would be noticed by the laziest one-flick-a-year stockbroker in the audience. Today such a gaffe would be all over social media. Replies: @Stan Adams, @Jack D
Utterly useless trivia:
There’s a scene in Exorcist II: The Heretic where Richard Burton flies from New York to Washington. The scene is illustrated with a shot of a 747 taking off.
Later in the movie, when he returns to the United States from Africa, the same 747 is shown landing in New York (presumably at JFK).
The plane portion of Planes, Trains and Automobiles features the 707 from Airplane!.
There’s an episode of the 1970s Hardy Boys TV series that took a great deal of ‘inspiration” from Airport ’77. (Incidentally, Airport ’77 was released in theaters two days before the 747 collision at Tenerife.)
This episode features stock footage of a 737, a 727, and a 707, all of which are supposed to be the same aircraft. I think there’s even a shot of a 747 but I’m not going to slog through the entire thing to double-check:
I've heard that going topless on beaches is associated by young French girls today with their mother's generation and of course you don't want to be like your parents. If "Blame it on Rio" was filmed today, the girls would be the ones covered up and embarrassed by their topless saggy parents.
Of course an increasing % of "French" girls wear burqas - the trend is in the other direction.Replies: @Dutch Boy, @Chebyshev, @Twinkie, @Harry Baldwin
I was in the south of France a few years ago and saw plenty of topless young women on the beaches. It hasn’t gone out of style. These were ordinary beaches where families went, not nude beaches.
------------
OT -- DO YOU SEE? DO YOU SEE?
https://i.postimg.cc/CK40Pgr8/1709244379665976.jpg
After we were done chatting I advised them to leave this part out of their What I Did On My Summer Vacation essays in September and they were polite enough to laugh.
As Peter Akuleyev alluded to, this was an era where cellphone cameras were not really a thing, so there was a higher implied degree of privacy. In addition, while tattoos were a thing, they weren't as ubiquitous as they are now. I wonder if the tattooed know how shitty they generally look.
*Because of the geography of the towns involved, the students at my school didn't really interact with the students at this particular schoolReplies: @Wilkey
Why should we believe your unevidenced claim? Your attestation would be more credible if accompanied by photographic evidence.

————
OT — DO YOU SEE? DO YOU SEE?
is what a fat person terrified of being left would say.
I'd say that perhaps the most fundamental insight of an intelligent person is that a society's long existing practices are culturally evolved and exist because ... they work.
And, of course, the corollary: breaking them for your new fangled "great idea" is almost certainly doing to "not work"--and quite likely be a disaster.Replies: @Erik L, @Hypnotoad666, @kaganovitch, @dcthrowback, @Anonymous, @mc23, @Bardon Kaldian, @Almost Missouri
Believe the highly intelligent Rob Henderson has a new book on this topic. His highly memorable turn of phrase, “luxury beliefs”, is one in which we will probably be using to describe this phenomenon going forward.
OT — I see the post-Clinton Democrats maintain their bizarre obsession with Haiti. Expect a new government soon.
In the future, you'll own nothing and you'll eat crap.Replies: @JohnnyWalker123, @Redneck Farmer
Can’t get enough of that “Sugar Crisp”!
There was no grammar involved. It was a simple homophonic substitution. You see these all the time– reign for rein, phase for faze, pour for pore. The late Kevin Phillips made that last blunder more than once in The Cousins’ Wars– like I said, it’s a smart person’s sort of error– which is forgivable, but Basic Books allowed it to go through, which is not. (I hope they paid to repair the documents Phillips poured whatever over.)
I’ll bet you the priciest Starbucks on Sixth Avenue, home to Basic Books*, that few if any of their proofreaders are registered Republicans. Or were 25 years ago. They need a refresher course in easily-confusable words.
But that would be homophonic!
*Which, by the way, has just released an updated edition of Dying of Whiteness, which I’m sure everyone here will rush out the door for a copy of. For your internment re-education seminars.
A great injustice!
This is a movement that Sailer must lead.
The first nudist golf course.
Not just white identity but white nudist identity. Not just citizenism but nudist citizenism.
The next printing of “Noticing” should feature Sailer and his readers in a nude group photo.
A fantastic front cover. People will NOTICE alright.
I don't know if nude golf is a thing yet, but nude bowling is.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EyuSEYUF0nU&list=PL27LUpxhrHPBEqubMjc5iBgwjVdASmuhJ&index=48
The boomers are all in their 60s and 70s now.
I remember that nude beaches were kind of a thing back in the late 1960s, 70s.
Agree with your assessment.
At Rotten Tomatoes, the movie has a critic's approval rating of 7% and an audience approval score of 40%. Any movie that is 4x or more more popular with audiences than with critics is a sure winner in my book. That means that the movie is actually entertaining trash, which this movie is. The movie equivalent of junk food. Do you check inside your McDonald's hamburger to see if the pickle slices are authentic French cornichons produced in the Champagne region?
Michelle Johnson was not much of an actress (she was a fashion model and the director picked her out of a magazine ad without hearing her speak a word) but at (or almost at) 18 she was very easy on the eyes wearing only a bikini bottom (or even less ). Once she hit the Wall her acting career ground to a complete halt.Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @ScarletNumber
Michelle was married to Matt Williams who is the third-base coach of the San Francisco Giants (and former manager of the Washington Nationals). They were married 1999-2002 during the latter part of his playing career with the Arizona Diamondbacks. During their 3½ years of marriage Matt made about $30 million dollars*. If half of that money is Michelle’s and she lives a quiet lifestyle, I think she should be set financially, especially since she has no children. Perhaps she can play a convention and sell autographs for extra money if needed.
*
So I wouldn't go so far as to say it would take "a lot" of character for an influential author to resist that temptation, just as it shouldn't take a lot of character for a money manager to resist stealing from his clients.Replies: @mc23
If you read about Ron Hubbard’s life he comes across as a scoundrel. According to one account from someone who was there at a small meeting of sci-fi writers, Hubbard exclaimed If you want to get rich, you start a religion. His naval service in WWII is a mess. Committed bigamy in his first marriage and his second wife divorced him citing schizophrenia.
Heinlein had a sense of humor…Starship Troopers wasn’t a militaristic novel, it was a satire on military fiction, of which there are many novels…
In Starship... he was frustrated about the communists of his time seemingly always winning so he was trying to put forward the idea of members of the military being considered as a special caste having special privileges as a way to cope with the communists-that idea didn't start with him but was floating around especially in France
Communists or not, looking at the privileged yet submissive officer caste of US military of today we can see that that idea would not have been the road to Nirvana
Often when an idea in fiction is really stupid in retrospect (or just a bad novel period), the escape valve is that it was just a sophisticated satire so when people criticize that idea or the novel means those people are low IQ morons who did not see it was a satire all along
Heinlein really meant it...but being flighty he moved on to sexual perversions next and other things including that in the future whites will be meat cattle to blacks and there is nothing that could be done about it
I'd say that perhaps the most fundamental insight of an intelligent person is that a society's long existing practices are culturally evolved and exist because ... they work.
And, of course, the corollary: breaking them for your new fangled "great idea" is almost certainly doing to "not work"--and quite likely be a disaster.Replies: @Erik L, @Hypnotoad666, @kaganovitch, @dcthrowback, @Anonymous, @mc23, @Bardon Kaldian, @Almost Missouri
Not really. Bloodletting lasted >2000 years.
Yep. Jealousy is our genes yelling “We matter!”
While not as obviously broken/insane as the “must have immigration!” b.s. or our fertility situation–which fail basic 6th grade math–with only a little knowledge of human sexual behavior, polyamory fails a trivial game theory 101 analysis.
If you could actually force people to do it, polyamory would be a way of culling the genes of diligent “provider betas”–precisely the unexciting but productive “thing” guys who have made the West (and now the East) so prosperous–as the gals coming into heat would somehow manage to get knocked up by the group’s alphas. But absent a gun to the head, these arrangements are so unstable they usually just spin apart.
Well said, Rich.
What normally happens in groups of feral humans such as Mormon polygamous cults is that the alpha male endeavors to get rid of the beta males entirely so he doesn't have to share the females at all. As the young men reach sexual maturity they are expelled from the cult for some imaginary offense - not keeping to the cult's impossible to follow rules that exist only in the head of the alpha.
You center your thinking about paternity but it's really about sex. In modern high income households there are few if any children. Nerdy intelligent white and Asian people (the SBF crowd) just don't have children at all any more. The fertility rate in S. Korea now is .72 children per woman and is expected to fall further. In Japan last year, births fell for the eighth consecutive year, to 758,631, a drop of 5.1 percent. The number of deaths, at 1,590,503, was more than double that figure, meaning the overall population declined by 831,872. The same thing is going on among non-Hispanic whites in the US , it's just masked by the immigrant influx and counting people like the Venezuelan murderer guy as "white".
The reason why nudism hasn't really taken off is that Americans are prudes at their very core. A nude scene in a movie will cause a movie to receive a more-strict rating than it normally would, while a scene containing violence or blood or other gore will receive a shrug from the ratings board. In addition, most people are quite uncomfortable with the mixture of children and nudity, even in a non-sexual context. My English-teacher friends tell me that they must censor Romeo and Juliet (Zeffirelli 1968) because of its brief topless scene but when I was in school we watched it without any issue.
In Blame It on Rio (Donen 1984) Michael Caine and Joseph Bologna decide to go to a topless beach where of course they run into their daughters Demi Moore and Michelle Johnson. Moore's straight long black hair was placed perfectly to cover her areola but Johnson was more of a trooper and was truly topless in the movie. Also, despite the physical similarity between Bologna and Moore the father/daughter casting is switched for reasons of plot.Replies: @Mr. Anon, @Sam Hildebrand, @prosa123, @Almost Missouri, @rushed boob job, @James J. O'Meara, @J.Ross, @Crawfurdmuir, @Reg Cæsar, @Twinkie, @Grey cat, @Rich
Adults will often show nude photos and films to young people in order to get them in the sack. It’s an especially common tactic of homosexuals. There was no reason for your teacher to show Zeffirrelli’s R & J when there are so many other versions that would be more appropriate for high schoolers.
https://thearkofgrace.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Olivia-Hussey-560x765.jpgReplies: @Rich
Rather than babble about some dead hack writer and sex weirdos and skyclad beaches, we should be far more concerned about the three trillion dollars in commercial real estate loans coming due in the next three years. Values of office properties have sunk like a stone now that everyone’s working from home. Unless our coward government does something there are guaranteed to be monumental loan defaults followed by bank failures.
I am distressed by what appears to be a general forgetting of how transitive and intransitive verbs work; NPR hosts (college-educated people who talk for a living) twist their sentences backwards to avoid speaking properly. As with Ebonics, if the meaning more or less gets through, that’s good enough.
In my view, polyamory is a life-style suitable for some kind of urban middle class childless population, essentially egocentric liberal types without serious devotion to any goal in life & whose mantra is "freedom from shackles of tradition". It is a facile & not a sustainable way of life; also, it is very marginal & almost invariably doomed to fail, as stats show- virtually all polyamorous & open marriage arrangements rather quickly collapse. It has nothing to do with polygamy/polygyny, which is a historical, social & economical pattern of marriage- just an "experimental" phase among middle class urban disoriented decadents without children. With children, it becomes complicated & most girls and boys coming from such "families" are damaged for life.
As far as real polygamy- ca. 99% marriages in Arab and similar societies are monogamous. Polygamy is more present, 15% to 30% among some Muslim African societies, but blacks are a race apart from other races, so polygamy among Caucasians and Asians is in reality extremely limited.
So far as the "jealousy" meme goes- it is astonishing that so many proponents of alternative sexual life-styles are so obsessed with it & consider this normal human emotion something to be eradicated. Sexual jealousy is a healthy sign of a true & authentic erotic love. Those who are almost ideologically committed to elimination of jealousy are mentally deranged people, probably encumbered with some hardly explicable pathologies.
Heinlein was, from what I know about his position on these matters, a typical rebellious spirit whose central motif in life was freedom & who was stranger to passions, family & deeper normal rhythms of life. He liked to play games, speculate, probe uncharted territories, explore erotic novelties... but he was shallow, psychologically infantile & definitely not a material for a strong & flourishing society.
Plato, Aristotle, Shakespeare, Lawrence, Dostoevsky & Freud would have dismissed him as an archetype of vitalist & intellectually curious infantilism.Replies: @AnotherDad, @voice, @Anon
Excellent–thanks Bardon.
As I said above, “Jealousy is our genes yelling “We matter!” You care about things that matter to you. The genes of people who don’t care about their reproduction, won’t be around very long.
Confess, I don’t know much about Heinlein. I read science fiction when I was an adolescent, then grew out of it. Someone told me I should read the “Stranger in a Strange Land”–that’s the “grok” thingy–when I was late HS or college age. Yawn. (Maybe I read the “Moon” thing too–not sure.)
But you paragraphs above are sort of my take. There’s just a lot of nonsense from many smart, but somehow “just don’t get it” people that wanders off into the weeds, just misses understanding of actual human experience.
“Polyamory seems to have burst upon the American mainstream over the past two decades.”
Nothing “bursts upon” the mainstream over two decades.
Much better would be, Polyamory may seem to have burst upon the American mainstream, but actually took over two decades to establish itself, only that lacks the hyperbole that content provider Christopher M. Gleason was looking for.
“Ethical non-monogamists.” English version: pretentious sex fiends.
Just today, I came across a “thing” in the hollywood reporter which spoke of the murderous heads of a massive drug dealing gang (the Flenory brothers of the black mafia family) as “successful businessmen.” (google aided and abetted thr by placing all sort of detours on its first page of results, when I punched in “black mafia family” and “murder.” I had to punch in the same keywords at duck duck go, in order to learn anything.)
“American sexual dissent”: That’s what used to be known as sexual deviancy.
In what passes for American journalism today, maximum clarity has been replaced by maximum confusion. These characters do not want readers peeking into the Wizard’s curtain. They see their business as mainstreaming evil.
You should talk.
https://thembeforeus.com/moira-greyland-i-was-born-into-a-family-of-famous-gay-pagan-authors-in-the-late-sixties/Replies: @notbe mk 2, @HA, @kaganovitch, @YetAnotherAnon, @Mike Tre, @AnotherDad
Arthur C Clarke was quite obviously a pedophile His move to Sri Lanka was basically after poor boys who needed the money In his famous TV series Arthur C Clarkes Mysterious World there are a lot of boys in the background He never really hid it and the producers tolerated it
I'm gonna check that out. Never saw the series.
Not only was Clarke into young boys, as a young man he was hanging around in Alistair Crowley's thelemic circles. That is, he was a satanist, which is pretty obvious in his work ( Childhood's End, his Space Odyssey trilogy, etc).
I could go on and on listing the many sci-fi/ fantasy writers who were perverts and weirdos and luciferians. H. G. Wells, for instance, was a self-avowed luciferian. (God the Invisible King, 1917). And a communist.Replies: @notbe mk 2
I'd say that perhaps the most fundamental insight of an intelligent person is that a society's long existing practices are culturally evolved and exist because ... they work.
And, of course, the corollary: breaking them for your new fangled "great idea" is almost certainly doing to "not work"--and quite likely be a disaster.Replies: @Erik L, @Hypnotoad666, @kaganovitch, @dcthrowback, @Anonymous, @mc23, @Bardon Kaldian, @Almost Missouri
As Roger Scruton, English philosopher and writer said “In discussing tradition, we are not discussing arbitrary rules and conventions. We are discussing answers that have been discovered to enduring questions.”
Heinlein was a bold and unconventional thinker but shallow. He started early in his career, writing Libertarian juvenile fiction and ended it writing juvenile Libertarian fantasy.
interesting
https://thembeforeus.com/moira-greyland-i-was-born-into-a-family-of-famous-gay-pagan-authors-in-the-late-sixties/Replies: @notbe mk 2, @HA, @kaganovitch, @YetAnotherAnon, @Mike Tre, @AnotherDad
“For some reason, sci-fi writers tend to be sexual perverts of some kind.”
From none other than HuffPost, but I’m guessing this time, the Unz-dot-com crowd isn’t going to have a problem with that.
Rest assured, you can skip the section on toxic masculinity (which is apparently required of every HuffPost blog entry), and just move on the LA Times link, if the former hurts your eyes more than reading about pedophiles. As for the article in general, I always figured there was something “off” about that show, but I certainly wouldn’t have guessed THAT.
I used to watch Star Trek back in the 60s.
Leonard Nimoy died in 2015 at the age of 83. William Shatner is still alive at 92. James Doohan, who played Scotty the engineer died in 2005 at 85.Replies: @HA, @Reg Cæsar
https://www.grunge.com/277353/the-untold-truth-of-gene-roddenberry/
In the future, you'll own nothing and you'll eat crap.Replies: @JohnnyWalker123, @Redneck Farmer
They’re not the best thing for you, but they are delicious, especially Honey Smacks.
Great articles Steve.
The ancient Greeks claimed athletics in the nude were an antidote to flabbiness. Male pride prevented it from becoming excessive.
allowed today
Perhaps not legally. I believe the actress was 14 or thereabouts, you hebes.
Nudism, in its best form, is a kind of relaxed experience of being free & psycho-physically recuperating. There is a sort of innocence in it- at least, judging from some nudists I know.
It is essentially asexual, because eroticism flourishes with partial covering, uncovering, titillation, gestures, .. .. Nudity in your face is actually anti-erotic. Especially if you consider that most nudists are physically…..ewwww, I won’t comment.
I don’t know about Trudeauistan, but how many times have I read of someone in the U.S. being arrested “for possession of Star Trek paraphernalia”?
Walter Williams was right: Replies: @ScarletNumber, @Wilkey
As a teacher, this is sadly true. My graduate classes involved a copious amount of busywork but none of it was rigorous. As for undergraduate teachers, in New Jersey one must complete a major in their subject and recently a regulation was added that one must complete at least a minor in their subject to teach 7th or 8th grade. An elementary-education major, which features SAT scores comparable to sociology and criminal justice majors, can only teach up to 6th grade in New Jersey now, where it used to be 8th.
https://twitter.com/CensoredMen/status/1763216777264144873/video/1
https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/1763279095318679791Replies: @Joe Stalin
While not as obviously broken/insane as the "must have immigration!" b.s. or our fertility situation--which fail basic 6th grade math--with only a little knowledge of human sexual behavior, polyamory fails a trivial game theory 101 analysis.
If you could actually force people to do it, polyamory would be a way of culling the genes of diligent "provider betas"--precisely the unexciting but productive "thing" guys who have made the West (and now the East) so prosperous--as the gals coming into heat would somehow manage to get knocked up by the group's alphas. But absent a gun to the head, these arrangements are so unstable they usually just spin apart. Well said, Rich.Replies: @Jack D
Unlike most animals, humans don’t really come into heat. The period during which human females are fertile is somewhat subtle – it can be detected by paying careful attention and keeping track of menstrual cycles and temperature charts and so on but it’s not obvious and given the (lack of) success of the rhythm method, far from perfect.
What normally happens in groups of feral humans such as Mormon polygamous cults is that the alpha male endeavors to get rid of the beta males entirely so he doesn’t have to share the females at all. As the young men reach sexual maturity they are expelled from the cult for some imaginary offense – not keeping to the cult’s impossible to follow rules that exist only in the head of the alpha.
You center your thinking about paternity but it’s really about sex. In modern high income households there are few if any children. Nerdy intelligent white and Asian people (the SBF crowd) just don’t have children at all any more. The fertility rate in S. Korea now is .72 children per woman and is expected to fall further. In Japan last year, births fell for the eighth consecutive year, to 758,631, a drop of 5.1 percent. The number of deaths, at 1,590,503, was more than double that figure, meaning the overall population declined by 831,872. The same thing is going on among non-Hispanic whites in the US , it’s just masked by the immigrant influx and counting people like the Venezuelan murderer guy as “white”.
What age range would you say they were? Over 15 years ago I was at Sandy Hook when I ran into students at a neighboring* high school to the one where I taught. They got a kick out of seeing a teacher at the beach. It was two boys and two girls who were in the latter part of their high school careers, and in New Jersey one must be 17 to drive.
After we were done chatting I advised them to leave this part out of their What I Did On My Summer Vacation essays in September and they were polite enough to laugh.
As Peter Akuleyev alluded to, this was an era where cellphone cameras were not really a thing, so there was a higher implied degree of privacy. In addition, while tattoos were a thing, they weren’t as ubiquitous as they are now. I wonder if the tattooed know how shitty they generally look.
*
Probably about 30-40% of the men on the beach were clearly gay. There were a few men who were clearly exhibitionists (though absolutely no one would have ever wanted them to be, not even the gay men). There were a fair number of older couples who looked like they spent every damn day there. While most of the older women were as wrinkled and saggy as you would expect them to be, one or two of them weren't bad looking for their age. It gave me hope for my 60s.
Along with us, there was a small but not insignificant number of other couples/young women in their 20s, and they mostly were pretty decent looking. I suspect that there are very few fat 25-year-olds who want to bear it all at the beach. There was one stunning young woman, probably about 21, whose face was nothing much to look at but who had the body of a goddess. Sitting there with my girlfriend, who was by no means unattractive (but has put on a crap ton of weight since then), it was hard to pretend not to notice.
I doubt the number of nude beaches has declined in the last 50-60 years. There might even be more of them. I think people were just more aware of them back before the time of easy internet porn. They have fallen out of cultural awareness in the same way that Playboy and the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issue have. Part of it is the fear of people taking pictures, but a lot of it (or most of it) is simply that no one cares anymore. Nudity is so easily accessible now that no one has to.
*Baseball ReferenceReplies: @Reg Cæsar
It's not that it was wrong, it's that it was screamingly obviously wrong. How hard was it, even before Tim Berners-Lee, to contact the airline and ask which particular craft they used on the route, and order shot of that one?
Brits and Yanks know little about the geography of South America. But a shot of a 747 or A380 connecting London and Liverpool, or Newark and Boston or Dulles, would be noticed by the laziest one-flick-a-year stockbroker in the audience. Today such a gaffe would be all over social media. Replies: @Stan Adams, @Jack D
In Japan they used to fly 747s (in a high-density seating configuration – over 500 seats) between Tokyo and Osaka because it was such a heavily travelled route. This lead to the highest single aircraft death toll in history (if you don’t count the WTC crashes) – the crash of JAL Flight 123:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japan_Air_Lines_Flight_123
The cause was a structural failure was caused by a faulty repair by Boeing technicians following a tailstrike incident seven years earlier. When the faulty repair eventually failed, it resulted in a rapid decompression that ripped off a large portion of the tail and caused the loss of all on-board hydraulic systems, disabling the aircraft’s flight controls. A contributing factor was the high number of cycles of pressurization/depressurization from the very short flights – 18,800 cycles in 25,000 flight hours. The plane continued flying, but uncontrollably, for another half hour, leaving many passengers time to compose final notes to their loved ones.
It is possible that better, Captain Sully type pilots would have figured some way to make a landing and save at least some lives but the Japanese pilots failed. In the similar United Flight 232 crash, of the 296 people aboard, 184 survived despite the total loss of hydraulics. Another pilot/ flight instructor who was flying as a passenger knew of the earlier crash and had practiced controlling the plane with only engine thrust in a flight simulator and he talked his way into the cockpit.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Airlines_Flight_232
https://youtu.be/rbTsG9jrJsU?si=pGw4p9nqEe6Rv0mg
(A href="https://youtu.be/C35DrtPlUbc?si=0qq5FSyBhiQ1K0DZ">Version with English subtitles)
My late father-in-law exclaimed, “That is naked sabotage!”
Before any evidence was in, while telling the public not to jump to any conclusions, the FAA and NTSB jumped to the conclusion that the crash had not been caused by a terrorist attack. For five days following the crash, the panicky feds floated a different, entirely speculative theory as to what had caused the crash. Birds in the turbine. The wake from the previous plane. The First Officer’s overuse of the tail rudder.
Whatever the truth may have been, the feds’ panic gave away that they were convinced that the crash was a terrorist attack.
The feds asserted that the plane went on fire only after its tail fell off, but several retired firemen and cops insisted that they saw the plane catch fire before the tail fell off. (Once the tail fell off, the machine immediately dropped from the sky.) The feds also insisted that the crash was completely caused by the tail falling off, when in fact that had never happened before. In the case you cited, Jack, the pilot was able to fly the machine for an additional 32 minutes in circles, before it crashed into the side of a mountain.
The authorities sought to make the First Officer, Sten Molin, the fall guy, allegedly for overusing the tail rudder, but if that were so, such crashes would be happening all the time. The local paper, The Wave (Howie Schwach, editor), did tremendous journalism, and many people from around here, including yours truly, are convinced it was downed by an act of terrorism, e.g., by a "shoe bomber," like the English moslem convert, Richard Reid, who was tackled by passengers when he sought to blow a passenger jet out of the sky 40 days later.
"Remembering Flight 587"
https://nicholasstixuncensored.blogspot.com/2010/11/remembering-flight-587.html
He was a delightful fellow who made friends with whomever he met. Also, he could bargain with Greek merchants and pension owners like nobody's business. Able to get them to meet his price but in a delightful way. If perchance we were to see our pension owner in the public market during the day, he would call out, "PapaSan" in a bright cheery voice and wave enthusiastically. Our landlord would smile broadly and wave back. There was no resisting his charm.
One day, we passed a group of Japanese tourists on the sidewalk of Athens. He said, "Watch this", and tried to engage them in conversation. They recoiled as though he were a snake. After they had passed he explained that most Japanese were so reserved that they could not let their hair down and relax their guard amongst strangers, that he was different. He said his father owned a number of downtown residential rentals in Tokyo, or somewhere. He never lacked for money.Replies: @Jack D
To some extent, comparing this and Flight 232 must remain apples and oranges. 232 was a DC-10.
Forgive me, because I don't feel like going over Flight 123 again, so I didn't read the Wiki article that you linked to, but didn't at least one person survive the JAL flight?
One who died on the flight was Kyu Sakamoto, the famous singer, who wrote and sang Japan's only worldwide hit popular song, "Ue o Muite Arukō", renamed "Sukiyaki" for the English-speaking markets, in 1963. It was a Billboard # 1 hit for three weeks in the U.S..Replies: @Jack D
How bizarre.
I used to watch Star Trek back in the 60s.
Leonard Nimoy died in 2015 at the age of 83. William Shatner is still alive at 92. James Doohan, who played Scotty the engineer died in 2005 at 85.
For everybody else here, Canada has her own version of Jan 6:
Letter from a Canadian Political PrisonerReplies: @Frau Katze, @Voltarde
In the 1955 novel, in 1929 NYC, Auntie Mame sends her 10 y.o. nephew to a nudist school where the girls sometimes pretended they were fish laying eggs on the floor and the boys would “swim” between them fertilizing the eggs. Mr. Babcock earlier objected to Epstein’s Dalton School because of its radical Jews.
I used to watch Star Trek back in the 60s.
Leonard Nimoy died in 2015 at the age of 83. William Shatner is still alive at 92. James Doohan, who played Scotty the engineer died in 2005 at 85.Replies: @HA, @Reg Cæsar
“Leonard Nimoy…William Shatner…James Doohan,…”
I suspect they’d find this kind of association pretty dismaying as well, though now that I think of it, something seemed a little off with Shatner, too — but again, not THAT. With regard to Nimoy I do recall there was a Hollywood rumor about a fellow Canadian actor who was known for playing risque characters (I’m going to take a wild guess and say the rumor originated with one of her publicists) and who played a character on one of the spinoff films (and by that point, Nimoy was allegedly an executive producer), who did a late night impromptu photo-shoot on the spaceship set with her boyfriend, in which she wore nothing but Vulcan ears.
When Nimoy chanced upon them, he ripped up the film and told her if she ever tried that again, she would be fired. But Nimoy claims that never happened.
I will say I did like GalaxyQuest a lot, and the Alan Rickman character seemed like a pretty obvious homage to him, but maybe someone who’s into sci-fi will be able to point to a number of other alien characters played by former Shakespereans who might also have been referenced.
My memory is fuzzy, so I looked up on the Internet. While Moore does have hair down her chest, you can see everything in a number of photographs.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japan_Air_Lines_Flight_123
The cause was a structural failure was caused by a faulty repair by Boeing technicians following a tailstrike incident seven years earlier. When the faulty repair eventually failed, it resulted in a rapid decompression that ripped off a large portion of the tail and caused the loss of all on-board hydraulic systems, disabling the aircraft's flight controls. A contributing factor was the high number of cycles of pressurization/depressurization from the very short flights - 18,800 cycles in 25,000 flight hours. The plane continued flying, but uncontrollably, for another half hour, leaving many passengers time to compose final notes to their loved ones.
It is possible that better, Captain Sully type pilots would have figured some way to make a landing and save at least some lives but the Japanese pilots failed. In the similar United Flight 232 crash, of the 296 people aboard, 184 survived despite the total loss of hydraulics. Another pilot/ flight instructor who was flying as a passenger knew of the earlier crash and had practiced controlling the plane with only engine thrust in a flight simulator and he talked his way into the cockpit.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Airlines_Flight_232Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @Nicholas Stix, @Twinkie, @ThreeCranes, @AceDeuce, @Jim Don Bob
That notable accident took out this fellow, whose voice Americans of a certain vintage will recall:
(a title=”https://youtu.be/C35DrtPlUbc?si=0qq5FSyBhiQ1K0DZ” href=”https://youtu.be/C35DrtPlUbc?si=0qq5FSyBhiQ1K0DZ”>Version with English subtitles)
I used to watch Star Trek back in the 60s.
Leonard Nimoy died in 2015 at the age of 83. William Shatner is still alive at 92. James Doohan, who played Scotty the engineer died in 2005 at 85.Replies: @HA, @Reg Cæsar
George Takei is also alive at 86. One of the last survivors not only of Star Trek, but of a fascist dictator as well. One your Conrad Black has a soft spot for.
For everybody else here, Canada has her own version of Jan 6:
Letter from a Canadian Political Prisoner
It’s appalling. Trudeau is a pos.
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/closest-friends-surprised-by-trudeau-revelations/article4300628/Opinion: An unflattering chapter in Trudeau's life
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/an-unflattering-chapter-in-trudeaus-life/article1097386/
https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/41JsOeuSZvL._SY445_SX342_.jpg
There is an ancient anecdote about how a Greek city dealt with an outbreak of female suicides. The city fathers decreed that all suicides would be carried naked through the streets to the cemetery. The outbreak ceased forthwith.
The inside jacket collage of Patrick Dennis’s later mock memoir, Little Me, includes a picture of a grown man with a boy and a girl on either side, all nude, on the rug looking up at a television. That’s 1950s nudism in a nutshell– innocent families going about their daily business like everybody else, just minus clothes.
For everybody else here, Canada has her own version of Jan 6:
Letter from a Canadian Political PrisonerReplies: @Frau Katze, @Voltarde
Re: Letters from a Canadian political prisoner
It’s appalling. Trudeau is a pos.
except the Zeffirrelli Rom and Julie is by far the best one, beloved by adolescent girls the world over The nude scene is very, very brief-blink and you miss it
All good points. There have even been some studies done showing married people in committed long term relationships Iive longer.
We have done the experiment with the Black community over the last sixty years of replacing husbands and fathers with welfare checks and the results have been disastrous. The same thing has been happening with working class Whites, just at a slower pace. Getting and staying married is increasingly becoming an upper class thing, as Charles Murray pointed out in his recent Coming Apart book.
Most men just do not care much about children who are not theirs so two people getting married and staying together usually ends up best in the long run.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japan_Air_Lines_Flight_123
The cause was a structural failure was caused by a faulty repair by Boeing technicians following a tailstrike incident seven years earlier. When the faulty repair eventually failed, it resulted in a rapid decompression that ripped off a large portion of the tail and caused the loss of all on-board hydraulic systems, disabling the aircraft's flight controls. A contributing factor was the high number of cycles of pressurization/depressurization from the very short flights - 18,800 cycles in 25,000 flight hours. The plane continued flying, but uncontrollably, for another half hour, leaving many passengers time to compose final notes to their loved ones.
It is possible that better, Captain Sully type pilots would have figured some way to make a landing and save at least some lives but the Japanese pilots failed. In the similar United Flight 232 crash, of the 296 people aboard, 184 survived despite the total loss of hydraulics. Another pilot/ flight instructor who was flying as a passenger knew of the earlier crash and had practiced controlling the plane with only engine thrust in a flight simulator and he talked his way into the cockpit.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Airlines_Flight_232Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @Nicholas Stix, @Twinkie, @ThreeCranes, @AceDeuce, @Jim Don Bob
I read about this disaster, following the crash of AA Flight 587, on November 12, 2001, four blocks from our home at the time. (We were vacationing at my wife’s family’s place in Trinidad.)
My late father-in-law exclaimed, “That is naked sabotage!”
Before any evidence was in, while telling the public not to jump to any conclusions, the FAA and NTSB jumped to the conclusion that the crash had not been caused by a terrorist attack. For five days following the crash, the panicky feds floated a different, entirely speculative theory as to what had caused the crash. Birds in the turbine. The wake from the previous plane. The First Officer’s overuse of the tail rudder.
Whatever the truth may have been, the feds’ panic gave away that they were convinced that the crash was a terrorist attack.
The feds asserted that the plane went on fire only after its tail fell off, but several retired firemen and cops insisted that they saw the plane catch fire before the tail fell off. (Once the tail fell off, the machine immediately dropped from the sky.) The feds also insisted that the crash was completely caused by the tail falling off, when in fact that had never happened before. In the case you cited, Jack, the pilot was able to fly the machine for an additional 32 minutes in circles, before it crashed into the side of a mountain.
The authorities sought to make the First Officer, Sten Molin, the fall guy, allegedly for overusing the tail rudder, but if that were so, such crashes would be happening all the time. The local paper, The Wave (Howie Schwach, editor), did tremendous journalism, and many people from around here, including yours truly, are convinced it was downed by an act of terrorism, e.g., by a “shoe bomber,” like the English moslem convert, Richard Reid, who was tackled by passengers when he sought to blow a passenger jet out of the sky 40 days later.
“Remembering Flight 587”
https://nicholasstixuncensored.blogspot.com/2010/11/remembering-flight-587.html
Splendid cultural commentary, Steve Sailer.
I read Stranger in a Strange Land when I was 14, and was greatly enthused for a few months.
Unfortunately, it served as a gateway drug leading to Atlas Shrugged which hijacked my adolescent mind for a few years, to my everlasting shame. I even went to some creepy Objectivist meetups that should have shaken me back to reality, but didn’t.
Oh well, I’m a freethinker now.
Heinlein's claim that he started writing science fiction due to a contest turned out to be bunk. His posthumously published novel "For Us, the Living" is a pure propaganda piece for free love, and absolutely terrible as a piece of fiction. But it is retroactively interesting in how many themes and turns of phrase found in that novel surface in his later works.Replies: @cthulhu
Obviously a matter of taste, but I disagree. I’ve read all of his post-Moon novels and to me the only one that succeeds even partially is some of Time Enough for Love – most of “The Tale of the Adopted Daughter” was good, and the descriptions of 1916 Missouri culture in the last segment were good. The rest…bah. Heinlein suffered a TIA (basically a mini-stroke) post-Time and the five books he wrote after that (including Job) are, to me, terrible; I read them hoping for signs of his earlier brilliance but no such luck, and he died before I gave up on him.
All that said, there are plenty of gems scattered in his oeuvre, if you ignore the post-Moon crap: the juveniles, as Steve says, are wonderful and full of life, especially the last two: Citizen of the Galaxy and Have Space-Suit, Will Travel (Starship Troopers isn’t really one because it was rejected by Scribner’s, and Podkayne of Mars is too stupid). The Puppet Masters is really good, and his terrific novella If This Goes On- got ripped off by Margaret Atwood in the terrible The Handmaid’s Tale.
Heinlein turned out to be one of the most important writers of the 20th century because the juveniles were so good and pervasive (school libraries had them!) but that influence is quickly waning as the woke idiots cast everything good into the outer darkness. But the books are still out there; check them out.
(And good handle!)
We need a little Christmas, indeed!
Mame was adapted into a movie (Saks 1974) by Paul Zindell. However, ABC didn't feel Lansbury was bankable as a Hollywood leading lady, so they cast Lucille Ball in the titular role. The problem was that Ball was not only 14 years older than Lansbury but more importantly Ball couldn't sing.
Neither the musical nor the movie mention the nudist school.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8dz03U2eIQwReplies: @Ralph L, @Jack D
Yup, like you I grew up with open showers, but my kids all have stalls and even individual shower rooms at their schools and athletic facilities.
I wonder how much of it is because people value personal privacy even more now that “there is no such a thing as privacy” or because everyone has mobile phones. Or perhaps because of the “rise” of open homosexuality and even transgenderism.
I also think of about whether this is now tied to kids not playing outside together without adult supervision like in the old days and it’s all supervised playdates (and no sleepovers either).
I am by far the most conservative mom in my neighborhood and am fine with this sort of thing but only let my kids consume media from before the Awokening and keep them off the internet.Replies: @Twinkie
Very good. You can have this experience in the U.S. too if you know where to look. For example at Korean spas that have spread throughout major metropolitan areas of the Unites States.
https://nypost.com/2023/06/09/women-only-spa-must-welcome-naked-trans-clients-with-penises/Replies: @Twinkie
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japan_Air_Lines_Flight_123
The cause was a structural failure was caused by a faulty repair by Boeing technicians following a tailstrike incident seven years earlier. When the faulty repair eventually failed, it resulted in a rapid decompression that ripped off a large portion of the tail and caused the loss of all on-board hydraulic systems, disabling the aircraft's flight controls. A contributing factor was the high number of cycles of pressurization/depressurization from the very short flights - 18,800 cycles in 25,000 flight hours. The plane continued flying, but uncontrollably, for another half hour, leaving many passengers time to compose final notes to their loved ones.
It is possible that better, Captain Sully type pilots would have figured some way to make a landing and save at least some lives but the Japanese pilots failed. In the similar United Flight 232 crash, of the 296 people aboard, 184 survived despite the total loss of hydraulics. Another pilot/ flight instructor who was flying as a passenger knew of the earlier crash and had practiced controlling the plane with only engine thrust in a flight simulator and he talked his way into the cockpit.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Airlines_Flight_232Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @Nicholas Stix, @Twinkie, @ThreeCranes, @AceDeuce, @Jim Don Bob
That ain’t happening post 9/11.
Finding a new house is one of life’s great delights. If you care for someone at all, you will burn their house down. As the Christian Scriptures have it “Greater love hath no man than this, that a man burn down the house of his friends” (John 15:13 ,Claudine Gay translation)
Coleridge? To this day, he remains as mysterious to me as William Blake. I mean, wtf?Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease
Prism, WHERE IS THAT BABY?!
Still the funniest thing on wheels, you’re not crazy.
“Coleridge? To this day, he remains as mysterious to me as William Blake. I mean, wtf?”
I hear ya bud, and I get it, but you know… you somehow just never forget your first love. And for me it was Coleridge.
My parents barely graduated high school, but they both had an enduring respect for education, and they had this sort of cargo-cult faith in the magical power of books, no matter what they were about. (My mother taught me to read age four using both the King James Bible and MAD Magazine. And “The Highwayman” by Noyes. And Coleridge.)
Which is to say, they just sort of larded up our house with books of any kind, they didn’t even know what was in them: they just went to garage sales and bought arm-loads of books and just left them lying around the house willy-nilly, confident that me and my sibs would just sort of pick them up and read them on our own. Which we did. For me, a typical day’s eight-year-old reading was Dr. Seuss, a medical textbook, Don Martin, “Everything You Wanted to Know About Sex”, “I Start Counting,” and Macbeth.
So, the first book I ever read on my own was not “The Cat in the Hat,” it was “The Rime of the Ancient Mariner.”
And I had done a grievous thing,
And it would work ’em woe:
For all averred, I had killed the bird
That made the breeze to blow.
You never forget a thing like that.
A stately pleasure dome decree
Where Alph the sacred river ran
Through caverns measureless to man
Down to a sunless seaReplies: @The Germ Theory of Disease, @YetAnotherAnon
In any case, looks like their technique worked!Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease, @The Germ Theory of Disease
It ended up with Elron stealing Jack's life savings and Jack's beautiful open marriage wife who helped Elron in this Having one's partner run away with another man happens especially if you stupidly advocate open marriages (like always this is something that Rob Heinlein never really thought through) but stealing money was back then and still is a criminal act
The hilarious thing is that we have correspondence between Parsons and Aleister Crowley where Al specifically warns Jack about the need to not trust Elron
Now seriously, how absolutely immoral do you have to be that the world's top Satanist warns people not to trust you? Think about it-the Beast 666 goes out of his way to help people because he sees that you are...evil Seriously, Elron was psychopathically evil from the very beginning
-and remember all this happened BEFORE Elron founded you know whatReplies: @mc23, @J.Ross
Thanks, looked up Jack Parsons, what a mess.
I should hope so! It started in the summer, no?
https://thembeforeus.com/moira-greyland-i-was-born-into-a-family-of-famous-gay-pagan-authors-in-the-late-sixties/Replies: @notbe mk 2, @HA, @kaganovitch, @YetAnotherAnon, @Mike Tre, @AnotherDad
Marion Zimmer Bradley belongs on that list as well.
Harold and Maude? I enjoyed that film as a student, not sure why.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harold_and_MaudeReplies: @Almost Missouri
Yeah, that was it.
I saw it a long time ago. Sort of an early ’70s period piece. I don’t remember having much other reaction than that.
I had forgotten the detail about her being a “Holocaust survivor”. If the movie were made today, that would probably somehow be grounds to ban it, though the exact logic would be vague. Cultural appropriation? Traducing of the sacred? Antisemitism?
One consideration militating against forcing the popularity of nudism à la trannyism is simply that many Americans, especially those Northeasterners who possess The Megaphone, live in climates which really demand clothing for comfort. It’s all very well for tropical people to go around nude or nearly, and it’s not too unpleasant for those who dwell in Arcadia (or other nice parts of California), but only seasonal nudism is really plausible in New York and a merely seasonal fetish just won’t support the political ambitions of the sex perverts and their allies both cynical and hysterical.
(You might suggest that people could just go nude indoors–and indeed, many already do at home–but people have to move around and public venues rarely have the kinds of cloakrooms they would need for everyone to be constantly doffing-and-donning all their clothes. People wouldn’t want to carry bundles of clothing around in supermarkets or restaurants. By contrast, trannies’ wigs (or combat boots), tics, and odd fashion choices, plus the chips on their shoulders, travel with them all the time.)
With respect to Heinlein:
I remember reading that Heinlein was distinctly unamused by impecunious hippies who had read Stranger and researched his home address showing up at his door asking to “share water.” Of course Heinlein was famously the author of the slogan “an armed society is a polite society” so he was not without ways to encourage people to go away.
Heinlein wasn’t afraid to shock readers, whether with the (ritual) cannibalism in Stranger or the incest in Time Enough.
After Robert A. Heinlein died, his widow Virginia (Ginny) Heinlein was entitled to, and did, reclaim the copyright to Stranger In A Strange Land. She then approved publication of R.A.H.’s uncut first draft of the book. In this case “uncut” doesn’t mean more salacious, but rather more verbose. The original publishers (G. P. Putnam’s Sons) had requested Heinlein to trim down the manuscript before publication, and he did this apparently without rancor. Having read both versions, I think the trimmed (i.e., first-published) version is much better, and apparently so did Robert A. Heinlein, because he told interviewers as much. Many of the changes are just omitting redundant adjectives and so-forth, though some plot-irrelevant passages were also excised. I don’t begrudge Virginia Heinlein her royalties on the later publication of the original manuscript, though, since comparing the two versions gives a useful example of good editing!
It seems unlikely that the multitudes dwelling today in the temperate regions or at even higher latitudes would like to live in a similar fashion.
He was a textbook activist for nudism as an identity politics identity: he had some kind of superficial Marxist colonialism/oppression analysis to back his nudism and a mental illness. Were he alive today he would cause a leftist Narrative Collision meltdown: on the one hand he was antibourgeois and norm-breaking [good], but on the other hand he was a young man flaunting his fitness [bad]. Alas, he took the path of other activist/martyrs and offed himself.
I first read Stranger in my teens, and growing up in a somewhat sheltered environment I missed a significant amount of the subtext, but I reread it at some point in my early 20s and “got it”. When the unedited version came out, I read it…and was very disappointed, although some of that was, in retrospect, realizing the last half of the book was just bonkers. Several years ago I reread the novel as originally published, and…oof; never again.At least two other Heinlein novels have been released in the unedited versions - one is The Puppet Masters - and I thought it was better than the originally-published version, but the editing was overall pretty light. Great book. One of the juveniles, Red Planet, has also been restored (apparently Heinlein’s editor at Scribner’s demanded some of the real and threatened violence be toned down), and I like the unedited version of that one better too.
She was Moira Greyland’s mother. And yes, she also sexually abused her. The father was a pedophile and the mother a lesbian. Her parents had a circle of equally perverted sci-fi writers colleagues.
(You might suggest that people could just go nude indoors--and indeed, many already do at home--but people have to move around and public venues rarely have the kinds of cloakrooms they would need for everyone to be constantly doffing-and-donning all their clothes. People wouldn't want to carry bundles of clothing around in supermarkets or restaurants. By contrast, trannies' wigs (or combat boots), tics, and odd fashion choices, plus the chips on their shoulders, travel with them all the time.)
With respect to Heinlein:
I remember reading that Heinlein was distinctly unamused by impecunious hippies who had read Stranger and researched his home address showing up at his door asking to "share water." Of course Heinlein was famously the author of the slogan "an armed society is a polite society" so he was not without ways to encourage people to go away.
Heinlein wasn't afraid to shock readers, whether with the (ritual) cannibalism in Stranger or the incest in Time Enough.
After Robert A. Heinlein died, his widow Virginia (Ginny) Heinlein was entitled to, and did, reclaim the copyright to Stranger In A Strange Land. She then approved publication of R.A.H.'s uncut first draft of the book. In this case "uncut" doesn't mean more salacious, but rather more verbose. The original publishers (G. P. Putnam's Sons) had requested Heinlein to trim down the manuscript before publication, and he did this apparently without rancor. Having read both versions, I think the trimmed (i.e., first-published) version is much better, and apparently so did Robert A. Heinlein, because he told interviewers as much. Many of the changes are just omitting redundant adjectives and so-forth, though some plot-irrelevant passages were also excised. I don't begrudge Virginia Heinlein her royalties on the later publication of the original manuscript, though, since comparing the two versions gives a useful example of good editing!Replies: @Veracitor, @Almost Missouri, @ChrisZ, @cthulhu
I should have noted that the indigenes of Tierra Del Fuego lived nude at the chilly, rainy Southern tip of South America and prospered, but their necessary habit of gathering around bonfires for warmth day and night most of the year actually inspired the European name for their domain. They even carried constant fires on stone hearths in their boats.
It seems unlikely that the multitudes dwelling today in the temperate regions or at even higher latitudes would like to live in a similar fashion.
Well, I didn’t know him well enough to answer that definitively. As I recall, he was from the Pacific NW, which always seems to have this inner-Hajnal throwbackiness to it. My impression was that he wanted a comfy, easy life, and so the supercilious feeling of being an extraterrestrial among the earthbound appealed to him. (I haven’t read Stranger, but I gather that’s what it’s about). The free love component sealed the deal. He just wasn’t finding too many matches. But maybe he did eventually and now lives contentedly with his manic pixie dream girl on the Willamette.
(You might suggest that people could just go nude indoors--and indeed, many already do at home--but people have to move around and public venues rarely have the kinds of cloakrooms they would need for everyone to be constantly doffing-and-donning all their clothes. People wouldn't want to carry bundles of clothing around in supermarkets or restaurants. By contrast, trannies' wigs (or combat boots), tics, and odd fashion choices, plus the chips on their shoulders, travel with them all the time.)
With respect to Heinlein:
I remember reading that Heinlein was distinctly unamused by impecunious hippies who had read Stranger and researched his home address showing up at his door asking to "share water." Of course Heinlein was famously the author of the slogan "an armed society is a polite society" so he was not without ways to encourage people to go away.
Heinlein wasn't afraid to shock readers, whether with the (ritual) cannibalism in Stranger or the incest in Time Enough.
After Robert A. Heinlein died, his widow Virginia (Ginny) Heinlein was entitled to, and did, reclaim the copyright to Stranger In A Strange Land. She then approved publication of R.A.H.'s uncut first draft of the book. In this case "uncut" doesn't mean more salacious, but rather more verbose. The original publishers (G. P. Putnam's Sons) had requested Heinlein to trim down the manuscript before publication, and he did this apparently without rancor. Having read both versions, I think the trimmed (i.e., first-published) version is much better, and apparently so did Robert A. Heinlein, because he told interviewers as much. Many of the changes are just omitting redundant adjectives and so-forth, though some plot-irrelevant passages were also excised. I don't begrudge Virginia Heinlein her royalties on the later publication of the original manuscript, though, since comparing the two versions gives a useful example of good editing!Replies: @Veracitor, @Almost Missouri, @ChrisZ, @cthulhu
This reminds me, we’re at 165 comments and why has no one mentioned, the Naked Guy of Berkeley?
He was a textbook activist for nudism as an identity politics identity: he had some kind of superficial Marxist colonialism/oppression analysis to back his nudism and a mental illness. Were he alive today he would cause a leftist Narrative Collision meltdown: on the one hand he was antibourgeois and norm-breaking [good], but on the other hand he was a young man flaunting his fitness [bad]. Alas, he took the path of other activist/martyrs and offed himself.
Still the funniest thing on wheels, you're not crazy.
"Coleridge? To this day, he remains as mysterious to me as William Blake. I mean, wtf?"
I hear ya bud, and I get it, but you know... you somehow just never forget your first love. And for me it was Coleridge.
My parents barely graduated high school, but they both had an enduring respect for education, and they had this sort of cargo-cult faith in the magical power of books, no matter what they were about. (My mother taught me to read age four using both the King James Bible and MAD Magazine. And "The Highwayman" by Noyes. And Coleridge.)
Which is to say, they just sort of larded up our house with books of any kind, they didn't even know what was in them: they just went to garage sales and bought arm-loads of books and just left them lying around the house willy-nilly, confident that me and my sibs would just sort of pick them up and read them on our own. Which we did. For me, a typical day's eight-year-old reading was Dr. Seuss, a medical textbook, Don Martin, "Everything You Wanted to Know About Sex", "I Start Counting," and Macbeth.
So, the first book I ever read on my own was not "The Cat in the Hat," it was "The Rime of the Ancient Mariner."
And I had done a grievous thing,
And it would work 'em woe:
For all averred, I had killed the bird
That made the breeze to blow.
You never forget a thing like that.Replies: @Steve Sailer, @res
In Xanadu, did Kubla Khan
A stately pleasure dome decree
Where Alph the sacred river ran
Through caverns measureless to man
Down to a sunless sea
In a vision once I saw:
She was an Abyssinian maid,
And on her dulcimer she played,
Singing of Mount Ebora.Could I revive within me
Her symphony and song,
Such deep delight 'twould win me
That with music loud and long,
I WOULD BUILD THAT DOME IN AIR!
THAT SUNNY DOME! THOSE CAVES OF ICE!
And all who heard would SEE it there,
And all would cry, Beware! Beware!
His flashing eyes! His floating hair!Weave a circle round him thrice,
And close your eyes in holy dread,
For he on Honey-dew hath fed,
And drunk the milk of Paradise.
I knew when I was five years old that I was going to be an artist, no wondering about it.Replies: @Chrisnonymous
If you’ve found it so, then respek, but my own experience has been that in most cases it’s pretty disappointing. I mean, there’s a reason these partners aren’t already committed elsewhere.
For any readers who still have enough of life’s runway ahead of them to make decisions that matter about this, my advice is that if you have something good now, there’s nothing better out there to justify the sacrifice.
A stately pleasure dome decree
Where Alph the sacred river ran
Through caverns measureless to man
Down to a sunless seaReplies: @The Germ Theory of Disease, @YetAnotherAnon
A damsel with a dulcimer
In a vision once I saw:
She was an Abyssinian maid,
And on her dulcimer she played,
Singing of Mount Ebora.
Could I revive within me
Her symphony and song,
Such deep delight ‘twould win me
That with music loud and long,
I WOULD BUILD THAT DOME IN AIR!
THAT SUNNY DOME! THOSE CAVES OF ICE!
And all who heard would SEE it there,
And all would cry, Beware! Beware!
His flashing eyes! His floating hair!
Weave a circle round him thrice,
And close your eyes in holy dread,
For he on Honey-dew hath fed,
And drunk the milk of Paradise.
I knew when I was five years old that I was going to be an artist, no wondering about it.
What’s a “line marriage”? Lining up for sex? Marrying your parents and/or children?
From those excerpts above, Heinlein sounds like a crashingly dull writer. One of the indicia of bad fiction is cramming huge amounts of exposition into what are supposed to be the characters’ casual conversations. It’s the main problem with science fiction: you have to explain, explain, explain everything: how the machines work, how many moons the planet has, what people eat for breakfast, what their marital structures are–the most basic things. It’s why I’ve never cared for science fiction. It’s excruciating.
The only exception I’ve found is Ray Bradbury. That’s because he made living on Mars exactly like living in Los Angeles.
A stately pleasure dome decree
Where Alph the sacred river ran
Through caverns measureless to man
Down to a sunless seaReplies: @The Germ Theory of Disease, @YetAnotherAnon
I think that’s how it goes…
That blind item site had an account of what is purported to be the making of Blame It On Rio.
https://www.crazydaysandnights.net/2017/11/four-for-friday-raped-for-part.html
“Lisa” = Michelle Johnson
On the other hand, statury rape laws in America are ridiculous. By age 18, girls have had more sex than they'll ever get later in life. 16 seems more reasonable, particularly in this day and age.Replies: @Almost Missouri, @Jack D
https://thembeforeus.com/moira-greyland-i-was-born-into-a-family-of-famous-gay-pagan-authors-in-the-late-sixties/Replies: @notbe mk 2, @HA, @kaganovitch, @YetAnotherAnon, @Mike Tre, @AnotherDad
Blimey. And I’ve only scanned the first couple of paragraphs.
“He told me unequivocally that no man would ever want me, because all men are secretly gay and have simply not come to terms with their natural homosexuality.”
It looks as though Walter came from a pretty dysfunctional background himself. Men who like boys and adolescent males seem irresistibly attracted to orphanages, Borstals, residential homes, “care settings”:
Aleister Crowley didn’t half mix with a lot of different people, Parsons and Hubbard included. Hubbard was a piece of work in the Crowley mould. I see that Walter Duranty married one of Crowley’s Scarlet Women.
https://www.crazydaysandnights.net/2017/11/four-for-friday-raped-for-part.html
"Lisa" = Michelle JohnsonReplies: @BB753, @Almost Missouri
I read that piece long ago. Nothing new here. Teenagers sleeping around with old dudes in the film industry to get parts. Only Demi Moore became a star for her trouble. But making a movie just so you and your mates could get to bang young starlets while on holiday in Brazil is truly evil.
On the other hand, statury rape laws in America are ridiculous. By age 18, girls have had more sex than they’ll ever get later in life. 16 seems more reasonable, particularly in this day and age.
In this particular case it may have been the Mann Act, along with Federal judges creating a sort anti-arbitrage, where the most unfavorable state law prevails.Replies: @BB753
https://www.crazydaysandnights.net/2017/11/four-for-friday-raped-for-part.html
"Lisa" = Michelle JohnsonReplies: @BB753, @Almost Missouri
Key: https://goo.gl/PgVi7B
Walter Williams was right: Replies: @ScarletNumber, @Wilkey
Eh? Franco Zeffirelli’s “Romeo & Juliet” is one of the finest adaptations of Shakespeare on film. To be fair, Zeffirelli was a bit of a perv (i.e., a normal human being, albeit a gay one) and his inclusion of a brief nude scene by his two underage leads was a bit controversial.
But there is strong justification for showing “R&J” in a classroom, especially since it’s a movie that teenagers would otherwise not be inclined to watch. The language of Shakespeare can seem extremely tedious to teenagers, but seeing it actually performed can demonstrate that there is real blood and life in those dramas that transcends time and space.
Do they have a representative sample of pedos, or are they patrolling Star Trek conventions?
Speaking of conventions, Trekkies cosplay, don’t they? I’d guess cosplayers, especially furries, are hugely overrepresented among perverts. Re: their statistics, do furries really not account for more than 1% of pedos? Or is there a large furry-trekkie overlap?
Seriously read Puppet Masters.
Farmers have surrounded the EU agriculture ministry building and hopefully they burn it to ashes and then burn the ashes.
It ended up with Elron stealing Jack's life savings and Jack's beautiful open marriage wife who helped Elron in this Having one's partner run away with another man happens especially if you stupidly advocate open marriages (like always this is something that Rob Heinlein never really thought through) but stealing money was back then and still is a criminal act
The hilarious thing is that we have correspondence between Parsons and Aleister Crowley where Al specifically warns Jack about the need to not trust Elron
Now seriously, how absolutely immoral do you have to be that the world's top Satanist warns people not to trust you? Think about it-the Beast 666 goes out of his way to help people because he sees that you are...evil Seriously, Elron was psychopathically evil from the very beginning
-and remember all this happened BEFORE Elron founded you know whatReplies: @mc23, @J.Ross
Two mistakes, getting taken by Lafayette and that one time in the chemistry lab.
I'd say that perhaps the most fundamental insight of an intelligent person is that a society's long existing practices are culturally evolved and exist because ... they work.
And, of course, the corollary: breaking them for your new fangled "great idea" is almost certainly doing to "not work"--and quite likely be a disaster.Replies: @Erik L, @Hypnotoad666, @kaganovitch, @dcthrowback, @Anonymous, @mc23, @Bardon Kaldian, @Almost Missouri
It is true for globally Western (including Russia), “free exchange of ideas” societies that have, even in the absence of freedom, some ineradicable compulsion to investigate & question. But this is not the case with three mammoth types of cultures:
a) for Islamistan- they are living in a continual religious stupor & not evolving in the past 800 years
b) for India- they cannot liberate themselves from the basic Hindu cast(e) of mind
c) for east Asia (China etc.)- they cannot be but an anthill where individualism is an alien concept. Hyper-functional anthills.
Oooops. Not.
https://news.yahoo.com/news/korea-fertility-rate-drops-4th-170315681.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9kdWNrZHVja2dvLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAIifkqdvXl3U1ZRIGGKMuvpVYbWoNOXuQnlDG0xRmg3BBUqw12QRvzl5yCuS_kHd6tswC865Tdr3xnKLsHYf8UHUR5DqQdR-96YulQBOaWGxMC73IqKWKloERCBjS4MxqkCUWkBbYIKKDSdvYwteXzIRag-1al59E4cLqC7Sw5xj
After we were done chatting I advised them to leave this part out of their What I Did On My Summer Vacation essays in September and they were polite enough to laugh.
As Peter Akuleyev alluded to, this was an era where cellphone cameras were not really a thing, so there was a higher implied degree of privacy. In addition, while tattoos were a thing, they weren't as ubiquitous as they are now. I wonder if the tattooed know how shitty they generally look.
*Because of the geography of the towns involved, the students at my school didn't really interact with the students at this particular schoolReplies: @Wilkey
I dated a girl at the end of my college years, and for a year or so after, who was a theater major and a bit of a libertine. One summer on our travels we came across a nude beach where we spent 2-3 days. This was 2000, iirc, and several years before smart phones became a thing, but we were still aware that people would try to sneak pictures, if you weren’t careful. Having to worry about cameras made it not entirely enjoyable, but mostly we were still too young to give a shit.
Probably about 30-40% of the men on the beach were clearly gay. There were a few men who were clearly exhibitionists (though absolutely no one would have ever wanted them to be, not even the gay men). There were a fair number of older couples who looked like they spent every damn day there. While most of the older women were as wrinkled and saggy as you would expect them to be, one or two of them weren’t bad looking for their age. It gave me hope for my 60s.
Along with us, there was a small but not insignificant number of other couples/young women in their 20s, and they mostly were pretty decent looking. I suspect that there are very few fat 25-year-olds who want to bear it all at the beach. There was one stunning young woman, probably about 21, whose face was nothing much to look at but who had the body of a goddess. Sitting there with my girlfriend, who was by no means unattractive (but has put on a crap ton of weight since then), it was hard to pretend not to notice.
I doubt the number of nude beaches has declined in the last 50-60 years. There might even be more of them. I think people were just more aware of them back before the time of easy internet porn. They have fallen out of cultural awareness in the same way that Playboy and the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issue have. Part of it is the fear of people taking pictures, but a lot of it (or most of it) is simply that no one cares anymore. Nudity is so easily accessible now that no one has to.
Seems rather mainstream as far as fetishes go.
Seriously, I've read it explained this way: a man being attracted to women in lingerie isn't a fetish; it's normal. A man getting a pile of lingerie and ejaculating on it is.
I agree with what every other reply to your comment has said. Speaking as someone who spent most of my 20s chasing after the alternative (see my other comment above), I came to realize that monogamy is sexual maturity. Few people want to spend their lives with a woman whose body count is north of 10 – or even 5.
Nowadays, with legal birth control and abortion, for any number of sexual partners greater than zero the number of children a woman ultimately has is inversely correlated with her total number of sexual partners – especially if you consider only women whose children aren’t entangled in the criminal justice system. Show me a good woman with 4-6-8 kids and I’ll show you a woman who has probably slept with no more than 1-2 men in her lifetime.
The 15-year-old in me would love to have a libertine society where we could sleep with anyone without consequence. The grownup in me – that would be the mature part of me – knows that isn’t possible. Sexual promiscuity in the West has coincided with tanking birthrates that may ultimately be the death of our civilization. Real maturity is finding one woman you truly love and sticking with her.
Reading JPs and related pages also makes me think he inspired certain parts of Robert Anton Wilson's Illuminatus!.
(Hitler and his fellows were with some frequency accused of occultism, consider Hell Boy for a recent example, but what was going on at JPL and in California seems to dwarf that.)Replies: @duncsbaby
While Hellboy is a fine enough COMIC BOOK, I dare say we don’t need to use it as a primary source for historical details on the National Socialists and their possible Occult fixation.
Nudism is kinda Nazi isn’t it? Or maybe it’s Swedish (pre-Somali) in which case it’s good.
-------
OT -- Anon on 4chan said:
Franz Kafka was a follower of the quackeries of the German-speaking world and at one point I believe he was a nudist. At one point he was into this thing where you had to chew your food a certain number of times and it drove his father crazy.
——-
OT — Anon on 4chan said:
Ackshully, Heinlein is famous in sf-writing for deftly and unobstrusively folding exposition into his prose. It even got dubbed “Heinleining” by the sf-writing community. See the Turkey City SF Lexicon.
https://thembeforeus.com/moira-greyland-i-was-born-into-a-family-of-famous-gay-pagan-authors-in-the-late-sixties/Replies: @notbe mk 2, @HA, @kaganovitch, @YetAnotherAnon, @Mike Tre, @AnotherDad
Not just writers, but Hollywood directors and producers as well.
(You might suggest that people could just go nude indoors--and indeed, many already do at home--but people have to move around and public venues rarely have the kinds of cloakrooms they would need for everyone to be constantly doffing-and-donning all their clothes. People wouldn't want to carry bundles of clothing around in supermarkets or restaurants. By contrast, trannies' wigs (or combat boots), tics, and odd fashion choices, plus the chips on their shoulders, travel with them all the time.)
With respect to Heinlein:
I remember reading that Heinlein was distinctly unamused by impecunious hippies who had read Stranger and researched his home address showing up at his door asking to "share water." Of course Heinlein was famously the author of the slogan "an armed society is a polite society" so he was not without ways to encourage people to go away.
Heinlein wasn't afraid to shock readers, whether with the (ritual) cannibalism in Stranger or the incest in Time Enough.
After Robert A. Heinlein died, his widow Virginia (Ginny) Heinlein was entitled to, and did, reclaim the copyright to Stranger In A Strange Land. She then approved publication of R.A.H.'s uncut first draft of the book. In this case "uncut" doesn't mean more salacious, but rather more verbose. The original publishers (G. P. Putnam's Sons) had requested Heinlein to trim down the manuscript before publication, and he did this apparently without rancor. Having read both versions, I think the trimmed (i.e., first-published) version is much better, and apparently so did Robert A. Heinlein, because he told interviewers as much. Many of the changes are just omitting redundant adjectives and so-forth, though some plot-irrelevant passages were also excised. I don't begrudge Virginia Heinlein her royalties on the later publication of the original manuscript, though, since comparing the two versions gives a useful example of good editing!Replies: @Veracitor, @Almost Missouri, @ChrisZ, @cthulhu
One of several observations in this well-written comment that made me laugh. Thanks Veracitor.
Thanks Peter, I think you’ve nailed two excellent points:
1) nudism is a “high trust” activity
Nudism can function ok in sort of “one-peopleish” places with high-trust norms. As you leave Europe and move toward low-trust tribal, Semitic, West-Asian cultures … The women aren’t there to be strippers for “men with gold chains” types leering at that them.
2) nudism is an “in the moment thing”
I.e. people comfortable being naked in this place, at this time. Having some a*hole taking pictures of your naked body for their “private enjoyment”–or posting them on the Internet–is not desired.
I’m not interested in nudism and don’t count its destruction as a great loss. But nudism is yet another high-trust thing being wrecked by these genocidal immigration zealots trashing of high-trust white nations.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japan_Air_Lines_Flight_123
The cause was a structural failure was caused by a faulty repair by Boeing technicians following a tailstrike incident seven years earlier. When the faulty repair eventually failed, it resulted in a rapid decompression that ripped off a large portion of the tail and caused the loss of all on-board hydraulic systems, disabling the aircraft's flight controls. A contributing factor was the high number of cycles of pressurization/depressurization from the very short flights - 18,800 cycles in 25,000 flight hours. The plane continued flying, but uncontrollably, for another half hour, leaving many passengers time to compose final notes to their loved ones.
It is possible that better, Captain Sully type pilots would have figured some way to make a landing and save at least some lives but the Japanese pilots failed. In the similar United Flight 232 crash, of the 296 people aboard, 184 survived despite the total loss of hydraulics. Another pilot/ flight instructor who was flying as a passenger knew of the earlier crash and had practiced controlling the plane with only engine thrust in a flight simulator and he talked his way into the cockpit.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Airlines_Flight_232Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @Nicholas Stix, @Twinkie, @ThreeCranes, @AceDeuce, @Jim Don Bob
My then girlfriend and I spent 2+ weeks touring Greece with a Japanese fellow our age whose parents were killed in that crash. We met him on the ferry from Brindisi. He said that he was traveling—this was 1986—in order to forget his loss.
He was a delightful fellow who made friends with whomever he met. Also, he could bargain with Greek merchants and pension owners like nobody’s business. Able to get them to meet his price but in a delightful way. If perchance we were to see our pension owner in the public market during the day, he would call out, “PapaSan” in a bright cheery voice and wave enthusiastically. Our landlord would smile broadly and wave back. There was no resisting his charm.
One day, we passed a group of Japanese tourists on the sidewalk of Athens. He said, “Watch this”, and tried to engage them in conversation. They recoiled as though he were a snake. After they had passed he explained that most Japanese were so reserved that they could not let their hair down and relax their guard amongst strangers, that he was different. He said his father owned a number of downtown residential rentals in Tokyo, or somewhere. He never lacked for money.
I always consider it amusing when I go on hikes or bike rides out in the country west of Philly. At some point you pass an invisible boundary that requires you to say "hi" to every stranger that you pass. Inside the boundary there are too many people to make it practical - imagine saying hi to everyone on the NY subway - hi, hi, hi, hi. Japan is a crowded place.Replies: @Reg Cæsar
OT — Bernard Avishai on the Israeli culture war — holy cow, that last line — nice excerpt here:
And
Or
https://archive.is/d6Pm0
https://consortiumnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Moshe-Dayan-1.jpg
Vladimir Jabotinsky scratches his head in confusion and quibbles, but the fascism was precisely because of ..."
https://thembeforeus.com/moira-greyland-i-was-born-into-a-family-of-famous-gay-pagan-authors-in-the-late-sixties/Replies: @notbe mk 2, @HA, @kaganovitch, @YetAnotherAnon, @Mike Tre, @AnotherDad
Hopefully advanced in medical technology will allow us to eliminate homosexuals and perhaps other perverts as well.
We are in an age of deep silliness, but ultimately any nation/civilization that wants to preserve itself will have to do some sort of eugenics–to replace nature’s harsh culling. And hopefully a lot of pervert will be culled along with other various deleterious mutations in a general eugenic program.
From what I can see, most homosexuals are made that way by abuse from existing homosexuals. So the only advance in technology needed is to return to the 1950s treatment of homosexuals.Replies: @NotAnonymousHere
The other possibility is there are genes that increase risk of obligate homosexuality by 1 percentage point but for the remaining 99% increase reproduction by 1.5%. If homosexuality reduces reproduction by 50%, then this gene spreads by about 1% per generation, which is very fast.
The problem with this theory is that you’d expect eventually a purer version of the gene that doesn’t raise homosex-risk. But not all such mixed genes can be purified. Otherwise you’d have “clean” versions of, eg, the sickle cell gene.Replies: @Jack D
well not really, if you read Sailer you see that the whole of Heinlein’s work was to put forward bizarre ideas to see what was going to stick
In Starship… he was frustrated about the communists of his time seemingly always winning so he was trying to put forward the idea of members of the military being considered as a special caste having special privileges as a way to cope with the communists-that idea didn’t start with him but was floating around especially in France
Communists or not, looking at the privileged yet submissive officer caste of US military of today we can see that that idea would not have been the road to Nirvana
Often when an idea in fiction is really stupid in retrospect (or just a bad novel period), the escape valve is that it was just a sophisticated satire so when people criticize that idea or the novel means those people are low IQ morons who did not see it was a satire all along
Heinlein really meant it…but being flighty he moved on to sexual perversions next and other things including that in the future whites will be meat cattle to blacks and there is nothing that could be done about it
In a vision once I saw:
She was an Abyssinian maid,
And on her dulcimer she played,
Singing of Mount Ebora.Could I revive within me
Her symphony and song,
Such deep delight 'twould win me
That with music loud and long,
I WOULD BUILD THAT DOME IN AIR!
THAT SUNNY DOME! THOSE CAVES OF ICE!
And all who heard would SEE it there,
And all would cry, Beware! Beware!
His flashing eyes! His floating hair!Weave a circle round him thrice,
And close your eyes in holy dread,
For he on Honey-dew hath fed,
And drunk the milk of Paradise.
I knew when I was five years old that I was going to be an artist, no wondering about it.Replies: @Chrisnonymous
What’s honey-dew?
Nauron! Bring me a new retard to behead! I grow bored of toying with this silly-nilly!
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/IxC4cvUsZv8/mqdefault.jpg
OT: https://usatodayhss.com/2024/nil-changes-coming-florida-considering-nil-to-be-allowed-for-high-school-student-athletes
https://www.dailysignal.com/2024/02/26/moms-inadvertently-expose-daughters-to-predators-on-instagram/
If you're a gym member, you see this kind of thing all the time.
https://www.facebook.com/joeyswoll/videos/1583594312444427
"Sometimes Richard would suddenly say, ‘Let’s knock off and go somewhere and fool around!’ The usual place we went was a topless bar in Pasadena, called Gianone’s. There was always something happening at Gianone’s in the afternoon, every day of the week. We’d walk in, grab a table. Feynman knew everybody there—all the ladies; Gianone, the owner; and anybody who was a regular. He would go behind the bar and pick up an orange juice, because he never drank anything alcoholic. He would also grab a half-inch stack of those paper doilies, or place mats that they put down on tables in restaurants, and come back to the table. We might continue doing physics, or we might watch the ladies dancing on the stage. Frequently people would come by and chat, and this was the sort of entertainment that he liked. But it was kind of deceptive because, believe it or not, although this particular environment might not seem conducive to doing something like theoretical physics, over the years, Feynman actually did an enormous number of calculations in that place.”
https://www.plannedman.com/the-means/work/part-two-feynman-strip-clubs-and-the-nobel-prize-as-a-performance-enhancing-drug/Replies: @notbe mk 2
yeah Feynman was always a cool guy Thanks for sharing this, I didn’t know about this
Gene Roddenberry himself was no saint. He was doing LSD, was promiscuous ( with women) and was into the occult.
https://www.grunge.com/277353/the-untold-truth-of-gene-roddenberry/
On the other hand, statury rape laws in America are ridiculous. By age 18, girls have had more sex than they'll ever get later in life. 16 seems more reasonable, particularly in this day and age.Replies: @Almost Missouri, @Jack D
I don’t know what the age of consent should be. We used to have this system in the US where each state could answer each legal question as they saw fit. Somehow this has been replaced with a Federalized one-size-fits-all system, typically devised by faceless, unelected and unaccountable bureaucrats in DC.
In this particular case it may have been the Mann Act, along with Federal judges creating a sort anti-arbitrage, where the most unfavorable state law prevails.
Neither do I. It depends on the individual. However, I'm sure that a 17 years old woman is an adult. I most European countries, the age of consent used to be between the ages of 12 and 14, until EU regulations established a consensus on 16 years old, which I find reasonable.
We are in an age of deep silliness, but ultimately any nation/civilization that wants to preserve itself will have to do some sort of eugenics--to replace nature's harsh culling. And hopefully a lot of pervert will be culled along with other various deleterious mutations in a general eugenic program.Replies: @Jack D, @Almost Missouri, @Pixo
I’m not sure that it’s every going to be possible to do eugenic breeding to get rid of homosexuality (not that in this Woke age anyone would even want to). In the past, homosexuals (“bachelors”) took themselves out of the gene pool and yet homosexuality never died out. There are various explanations for why it did not die out as a result – for example that it confers a fertility advantage on sisters but it does exist and I doubt that there is any medical advance that is going to make it go away. Perhaps it could someday be diagnosed in vitro or during gestation and the embryo discarded or the fetus aborted but that’s not going to please the anti-abortion crowd nor the LGBT crowd – it would just piss EVERYONE off.
I've thought since the 70s--I think I read some Psychology Today article--that it (male homosexuality) is most likely some sort of "womb environment" issue, during a critical phase of brain development. Or it could be Cochran's bug. Or both--some bug infecting the mother causes a womb environment that causes the malfunction.
The point is those are things that can be figured out by medical science and potentially prevented. I agree that we may end up in an oddity where most normies abort homosexual fetuses, but the "religious" (woke or traditional) do not and you only find homosexuals in those families.
But ultimately--science marches on--I expect they'll be prevention and this scourge upon humanity will come to an end.Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @Anonymous
We are in an age of deep silliness, but ultimately any nation/civilization that wants to preserve itself will have to do some sort of eugenics--to replace nature's harsh culling. And hopefully a lot of pervert will be culled along with other various deleterious mutations in a general eugenic program.Replies: @Jack D, @Almost Missouri, @Pixo
Perhaps, but that would only work if the left-meme of “born that way” is true, of which I am skeptical, if for no other reason than that it is the left pushing it, which is a fairly reliable indicator of falsehood.
From what I can see, most homosexuals are made that way by abuse from existing homosexuals. So the only advance in technology needed is to return to the 1950s treatment of homosexuals.
"Help yourself to an Ayds, they're delicious. Okay, let's hear the pitch."
"Um, well, hear me out now, this project centers around showing Demi Moore nude as much as possible."
"Demi Moore? Why that's one of our top nude actresses! I hear they're real and they're spectacular! Suzy, make an appointment with Dr. Bison, tell him it's for me. Dang priapism's back."
Veracitor says:Next New Comment
March 1, 2024 at 7:20 am GMT • 9.8 hours ago • 400 Words ↑ Barre VT is known for its thriving downtown outdoors nudist scene.
Almost Missouri says:Next New Comment
March 1, 2024 at 8:00 am GMT • 9.1 hours ago • 100 Words ↑
@Veracitor The nice parts of California are legion, Arcata in the north has a thriving outdoor nudist scene (Humboldt College). Et in Arcata ego...
The Germ Theory of Disease says: Replies: @Almost Missouri
I'd say that perhaps the most fundamental insight of an intelligent person is that a society's long existing practices are culturally evolved and exist because ... they work.
And, of course, the corollary: breaking them for your new fangled "great idea" is almost certainly doing to "not work"--and quite likely be a disaster.Replies: @Erik L, @Hypnotoad666, @kaganovitch, @dcthrowback, @Anonymous, @mc23, @Bardon Kaldian, @Almost Missouri
[Insert Gods of the Copybook Headings here.]
Still the funniest thing on wheels, you're not crazy.
"Coleridge? To this day, he remains as mysterious to me as William Blake. I mean, wtf?"
I hear ya bud, and I get it, but you know... you somehow just never forget your first love. And for me it was Coleridge.
My parents barely graduated high school, but they both had an enduring respect for education, and they had this sort of cargo-cult faith in the magical power of books, no matter what they were about. (My mother taught me to read age four using both the King James Bible and MAD Magazine. And "The Highwayman" by Noyes. And Coleridge.)
Which is to say, they just sort of larded up our house with books of any kind, they didn't even know what was in them: they just went to garage sales and bought arm-loads of books and just left them lying around the house willy-nilly, confident that me and my sibs would just sort of pick them up and read them on our own. Which we did. For me, a typical day's eight-year-old reading was Dr. Seuss, a medical textbook, Don Martin, "Everything You Wanted to Know About Sex", "I Start Counting," and Macbeth.
So, the first book I ever read on my own was not "The Cat in the Hat," it was "The Rime of the Ancient Mariner."
And I had done a grievous thing,
And it would work 'em woe:
For all averred, I had killed the bird
That made the breeze to blow.
You never forget a thing like that.Replies: @Steve Sailer, @res
Seems to me you either lived in a place with some very interesting garage sales (seriously, a college town?) or you are underestimating the ability of your parents to pick out good stuff. My guess would be some of both.
In any case, looks like their technique worked!
New York City is, if you want to style it that way, a place with more than a few interesting garage sales. My father was descended from a long line of archaic Aran Isles fishermen; my grandfather, the grumpy illiterate Popeye-inflected deep-sea old salt that he was, died before he got a chance to see his grandson directing avant-garde Shakespeare plays at Harvard, but I bet he would have been tickled at the thought of it. My mother came from slightly more refined stock, her ancestors include Lord Dunsany and Saint Oliver Plunkett, Bishop and Martyr, but you know, the Depression and World War Two sort of got in the way of things, so she never got to go places.
My father once bought us a microscope and then just left it on a coffee table in the living room with no explanation, he just assumed we'd figure it out if we felt like it. That was sort of how they rolled.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a4UQJwd3awQ
Sitting right here on my writing desk right next to my laptop and a bottle of good chilled Italian vermouth is a hard-cover first edition of Carl Sandburg's "Rootabaga Stories" -- the same one my AIDS-victim Uncle J. gave me when I was just a sprout, the same first edition I gave to Lorne and Alice on the occasion of the birth of their first son... with the inscription, "Henry, this is the book that made me want to be a writer. So, y'know... read it at your peril." Only the fire-born understand blue.
I still have the old phone I used when I picked it up and was told that my stuff had just been translated into Czech and Polish, and I had won some sort of kooky Polish award, never really found out what. I remember thinking the Brazilian guys were actually more polite.
Me and my older brother the hockey star, now busy dying of an incurable illness, used to trade signed first editions. He always got the better of me, he actually somehow contrived to get a signed Pynchon. When I asked him how the f$ck he did that, he shrugged and said, "I have my resources."
Children picking up our bones
Will never know that these were once
As quick as foxes on the hill
(Stevens)Replies: @vinteuil
In 1960, the average American male was 5’8″ and 166 pounds. The average American female was 5’3″ and 140 pounds.
In 2024, the average American male is 5’9″ and 199 pounds. The average American female is 5’3″ and 171 pounds (Note: the female weight number is from 2021, the most current I could find…they can’t handle the truth).
It was a different world. The “OK, Boomer” crowd can’t understand how delightful it was.
Speaking of body weight:
https://www.facebook.com/wsmbrianshaw/videos/301639672864259
On the other hand, statury rape laws in America are ridiculous. By age 18, girls have had more sex than they'll ever get later in life. 16 seems more reasonable, particularly in this day and age.Replies: @Almost Missouri, @Jack D
The movie did respectable box office for those days -$18.6 million and apparently made a small profit. It must have been relatively cheap to shoot down in Rio and as the blind item said they were not going for quality and did not do a lot of retakes, which I can believe. The critics hated it but the audiences liked it better.
So I think it is unfair to say that it was made PURELY so that the older men involved could have sex with teen actresses. That is a lot of effort for something that could have been accomplished much more cheaply. They were mixing business with pleasure. Donen could not have had a 40 year career in Hollywood without having some movie making ability. He was going to make a profitable movie AND shtup starlets – a win-win. Caine was going to shtup starlets AND get nicely paid for his role also. The starlets were going to sleep with these men and get a big boost to their careers (before this movie Johnson was a fashion model and didn’t HAVE a movie career, afterward she did.) In real life people are not cartoon villains twirling their moustaches and the starlets are not virgins tricked into white slavery. This black and white view is wrong because if there are people who are 100% black like Cartoon Donen and Cartoon Caine then there must also be people who are 100% white and they don’t exist either.
This is a movement that Sailer must lead.
The first nudist golf course.
Not just white identity but white nudist identity. Not just citizenism but nudist citizenism.
The next printing of "Noticing" should feature Sailer and his readers in a nude group photo.
A fantastic front cover. People will NOTICE alright.Replies: @heynonnynonymous
The first nudist golf course.
I don’t know if nude golf is a thing yet, but nude bowling is.
In 2024, the average American male is 5'9" and 199 pounds. The average American female is 5'3" and 171 pounds (Note: the female weight number is from 2021, the most current I could find...they can't handle the truth).
It was a different world. The "OK, Boomer" crowd can't understand how delightful it was.
Speaking of body weight:
https://www.facebook.com/wsmbrianshaw/videos/301639672864259Replies: @notbe mk 2
it must have been wonderful to be an adolescent boy visiting a California beach in the sixties and seeing all those fit, sun-kissed, feminine and svelte girls in bikinis
Yeah, the guys calling Heinlein a cuck haven’t been properly introduced to the likes of John Scalzi.
I’m not so sure. He was a United flight instructor and might have been known personally or at least by name to the pilots. At that point they were desperate and figured that they and the hundreds of people on board were all going to die and might have accepted help from anyone claiming to have a helpful idea.
To this day off duty pilots going somewhere will sometimes fly in a jump seat in cockpit. Recently this almost lead to tragedy when such a pilot went nuts.
https://www.dallasnews.com/business/airlines/2023/10/23/jumpseat-pilot-alaska-airlines-regional-flight-tried-to-shut-down-engines/
https://i.postimg.cc/kgxR9tR0/1709236013715409.jpgReplies: @Jack D
Can you tell me which Israeli said the words in the bottom photo, in particular “we will kill them all”, implying perhaps the entire population of Gaza (or maybe all Palestinians or all Arabs)? No you can’t because no Israeli actually said those words nor is this the policy or the intent of the IDF. This is a false propaganda meme made up by some Arab.
Netanyahu has vowed, however, that all of the terrorists involved in planning and carry out the brutal attack of 10/7 are “dead men”. This is only fair given the unforgivable atrocities that they committed that day. Nor was he kidding about this. To the extent that they are not killed in the current round of fighting, Israel will pursue and find these men and kill them wherever they are, even if it take decades. These men should and must spend the rest of their lives looking over their shoulders and not sleep in the same bed twice and still the Israelis will find them.
We are in an age of deep silliness, but ultimately any nation/civilization that wants to preserve itself will have to do some sort of eugenics--to replace nature's harsh culling. And hopefully a lot of pervert will be culled along with other various deleterious mutations in a general eugenic program.Replies: @Jack D, @Almost Missouri, @Pixo
Homosexuality probably has a very large number of genes involved, including many that are very rare mutations. Basically like schizophrenia, which I think is a useful mental model.
The other possibility is there are genes that increase risk of obligate homosexuality by 1 percentage point but for the remaining 99% increase reproduction by 1.5%. If homosexuality reduces reproduction by 50%, then this gene spreads by about 1% per generation, which is very fast.
The problem with this theory is that you’d expect eventually a purer version of the gene that doesn’t raise homosex-risk. But not all such mixed genes can be purified. Otherwise you’d have “clean” versions of, eg, the sickle cell gene.
Whereas prior to 2000 years ago, there was no bloodletting?
OT — Perfidious Albion, which God strafes, has gone from glorying as the Zeus’s head which birthed our freedoms to shambling around as the Airstrip which has imprisoned Sven Longshanks (James Allchurch) and Sam Melia for thoughtcrime. So I guess I’m just going to have to send them dough every month, and hope that you will also, and hope that the dough prospers as censorship-proof discussion breads.
https://www.givesendgo.com/SupportSven
https://www.givesendgo.com/sammelia
And we should all be a little more grateful to Steve and Unz and Derb in the shadow of this dark news.
Sam was imprisoned for stickers that he had stuck on his laptop. Illegal stickers.
Homosexuals reproduce through child abuse.
There’s politicians that have talked like this on TV, Jack. It’s a paraphrase but a responsible paraphrase, and if we include past statements from other situations there are abundant examples. You are ineffective at lying and should not stoop to it.
OTOH, Hamas has made no secret that they would like to kill all the Jews and they tried to kill as many as they could on 10/7.
In its founding charter, Hamas cites a particularly violent hadith as proof that Muslims need to fight and kill Jews: Hey, at least we've got the Gharqad trees on our side!Replies: @J.Ross, @Ennui
So you’re saying Hollywood is gay as fuck?
Agreed for once! Women use men just as men use women. The MeToo business was a scam. How are we to believe a beneficial business transaction thirty years ago was rape?
If you liked Galaxy Quest, I can’t hate you!
Let’s face it, Star Trek creator Gene Roddenberry was a perv of the first water. Actress Angelique Pettyjohn admitted that she had sex with Roddenberry to get a role in the series.
Galaxy Quest paid homage to Roddenberry’s kinks by disappearing Tim Allen’s shirt at one point (and commenting on it) as well as Sigourney Weaver’s increasingly tattered uniform shirt. There’s a deleted scene that, to a Trek fan, references Uhura. Starts a 2:57.
https://www.getyarn.io/yarn-clip/9c5dfdfb-fc3f-4121-bf17-4a747e577e28
I'll take that for whatever it gets me, but the impression I get is that it's hard to find anyone who didn't like that movie. It'd be like someone telling you they're a Coltrane fan even though it turns out the only thing they even bothered listening to was "Kind of Blue", or that Rogers & Hammerstein cover.
"Galaxy Quest paid homage to Roddenberry’s kinks by disappearing Tim Allen’s shirt at one point..."
I guess that will serve to prepare me for the GRR Martin homages that will inevitably start being made at some point, but given that Martin prefers to do his own Rule34 right from the get-go, maybe it won't -- that may just be too hard to parody.
“In his famous TV series Arthur C Clarkes Mysterious World there are a lot of boys in the background He never really hid it and the producers tolerated it”
I’m gonna check that out. Never saw the series.
Not only was Clarke into young boys, as a young man he was hanging around in Alistair Crowley’s thelemic circles. That is, he was a satanist, which is pretty obvious in his work ( Childhood’s End, his Space Odyssey trilogy, etc).
I could go on and on listing the many sci-fi/ fantasy writers who were perverts and weirdos and luciferians. H. G. Wells, for instance, was a self-avowed luciferian. (God the Invisible King, 1917). And a communist.
His Mysterious World series from the eighties investigates Bigfoot, UFOs etc is excellent Clarke provides a skeptical opening and closing commentary which was welcome although a bit unusual since most such documentaries are out-and-out credulous This aside, lots of the commentaries feature preadolescent Sri Lankan boys stripped to the waist just hanging around The producers surely could have chosen not to include it in the opening/closing segments but I think they must have been disturbed by their hero's lifestyle and were dropping discreet hints (at least I hope so and I hope they were not celebrating his lifestyle)-its painfully obvious from the series that Clarke was a molester which like usual only became public after his death so nothing could be done as always
Oh Jeez- now I remember; Mysterious World opened with a skull dominating the screen- seriously Sir A C Clarke was really a f..ed up individualReplies: @BB753
Downsides?
I mean what can “our” government do that will not make the situation worse than what is already baked in?
And by the way,
Pshaw! A mere flesh wound! We have $37 trillion of outstanding public debt (i.e., you and I are theoretically on the hook for it, unlike commercial real estate loans), and it grows every year. And then there are something north of $200 trillion of unfunded public liabilities (Soc. Sec, Medicare, etc.): commitments already made that can only be unmade by deep social unrest.
A mere $3 trillion of private malinvestment by people who should have known better? Why can’t the normal thing happen in such cases: they eat their own losses without getting the rest of us involved?
https://www.usdebtclock.org/index.html
Tell that to Trump, your boy, and see what happens.
Clarity note: While I’d consider eliminating homosexuality ideologically part of a general “eugenic cleanup”, I’m not implying it is any sort of simple genetic issue. If it was, it simply would not exist for obvious reasons.
I’ve thought since the 70s–I think I read some Psychology Today article–that it (male homosexuality) is most likely some sort of “womb environment” issue, during a critical phase of brain development. Or it could be Cochran’s bug. Or both–some bug infecting the mother causes a womb environment that causes the malfunction.
The point is those are things that can be figured out by medical science and potentially prevented. I agree that we may end up in an oddity where most normies abort homosexual fetuses, but the “religious” (woke or traditional) do not and you only find homosexuals in those families.
But ultimately–science marches on–I expect they’ll be prevention and this scourge upon humanity will come to an end.
Note that, while not homos (but worse!), James "Jan" Morris had five children, and Bruce "Caitlyn" Jenner has six. The kind of people who would abort their children for being less than perfect in some way are going to be outbred by true "normies" anyway. Look at East Asia-- every child must be perfect, and the birth rate now hardly replaces one parent, let alone both.
Also, homoeroticism and susceptibility to homoeroticism are different things. The latter is more likely what's inherited, leaving some more open to relevant environmental factors than others. Even so, that fetus with the "gay gene" may turn out just fine.Replies: @Jack D, @Rich
Nothing "bursts upon" the mainstream over two decades.
Much better would be, Polyamory may seem to have burst upon the American mainstream, but actually took over two decades to establish itself, only that lacks the hyperbole that content provider Christopher M. Gleason was looking for.
"Ethical non-monogamists." English version: pretentious sex fiends.
Just today, I came across a "thing" in the hollywood reporter which spoke of the murderous heads of a massive drug dealing gang (the Flenory brothers of the black mafia family) as "successful businessmen." (google aided and abetted thr by placing all sort of detours on its first page of results, when I punched in "black mafia family" and "murder." I had to punch in the same keywords at duck duck go, in order to learn anything.)
"American sexual dissent": That's what used to be known as sexual deviancy.
In what passes for American journalism today, maximum clarity has been replaced by maximum confusion. These characters do not want readers peeking into the Wizard's curtain. They see their business as mainstreaming evil.Replies: @Almost Missouri, @Corvinus
Many such cases.
Indeed. And not just journalists. Add the government, academy, and tech sectors.
In this particular case it may have been the Mann Act, along with Federal judges creating a sort anti-arbitrage, where the most unfavorable state law prevails.Replies: @BB753
“I don’t know what the age of consent should be”
Neither do I. It depends on the individual. However, I’m sure that a 17 years old woman is an adult. I most European countries, the age of consent used to be between the ages of 12 and 14, until EU regulations established a consensus on 16 years old, which I find reasonable.
There’s enough of that crap already.
https://www.dailysignal.com/2024/02/26/moms-inadvertently-expose-daughters-to-predators-on-instagram/
If you’re a gym member, you see this kind of thing all the time.
https://www.facebook.com/joeyswoll/videos/1583594312444427
(You might suggest that people could just go nude indoors--and indeed, many already do at home--but people have to move around and public venues rarely have the kinds of cloakrooms they would need for everyone to be constantly doffing-and-donning all their clothes. People wouldn't want to carry bundles of clothing around in supermarkets or restaurants. By contrast, trannies' wigs (or combat boots), tics, and odd fashion choices, plus the chips on their shoulders, travel with them all the time.)
With respect to Heinlein:
I remember reading that Heinlein was distinctly unamused by impecunious hippies who had read Stranger and researched his home address showing up at his door asking to "share water." Of course Heinlein was famously the author of the slogan "an armed society is a polite society" so he was not without ways to encourage people to go away.
Heinlein wasn't afraid to shock readers, whether with the (ritual) cannibalism in Stranger or the incest in Time Enough.
After Robert A. Heinlein died, his widow Virginia (Ginny) Heinlein was entitled to, and did, reclaim the copyright to Stranger In A Strange Land. She then approved publication of R.A.H.'s uncut first draft of the book. In this case "uncut" doesn't mean more salacious, but rather more verbose. The original publishers (G. P. Putnam's Sons) had requested Heinlein to trim down the manuscript before publication, and he did this apparently without rancor. Having read both versions, I think the trimmed (i.e., first-published) version is much better, and apparently so did Robert A. Heinlein, because he told interviewers as much. Many of the changes are just omitting redundant adjectives and so-forth, though some plot-irrelevant passages were also excised. I don't begrudge Virginia Heinlein her royalties on the later publication of the original manuscript, though, since comparing the two versions gives a useful example of good editing!Replies: @Veracitor, @Almost Missouri, @ChrisZ, @cthulhu
I have also read both versions and wholeheartedly agree.
I first read Stranger in my teens, and growing up in a somewhat sheltered environment I missed a significant amount of the subtext, but I reread it at some point in my early 20s and “got it”. When the unedited version came out, I read it…and was very disappointed, although some of that was, in retrospect, realizing the last half of the book was just bonkers. Several years ago I reread the novel as originally published, and…oof; never again.
At least two other Heinlein novels have been released in the unedited versions – one is The Puppet Masters – and I thought it was better than the originally-published version, but the editing was overall pretty light. Great book. One of the juveniles, Red Planet, has also been restored (apparently Heinlein’s editor at Scribner’s demanded some of the real and threatened violence be toned down), and I like the unedited version of that one better too.
From what I can see, most homosexuals are made that way by abuse from existing homosexuals. So the only advance in technology needed is to return to the 1950s treatment of homosexuals.Replies: @NotAnonymousHere
All I know is if I lost my hydraulics I might ponder whether life is still worth living. I ANAL but I am a lawyer. Riddle me these questions three.
Yeah, it’s kind of the whole reason for the movie. In Asia it was released under the title Who Let the Dugs Out?. Japanese men are crazy for Demi Moore. Even George Takei has admitted to cranking to her, but only with Ashton Kutcher in the mix.
“Help yourself to an Ayds, they’re delicious. Okay, let’s hear the pitch.”
“Um, well, hear me out now, this project centers around showing Demi Moore nude as much as possible.”
“Demi Moore? Why that’s one of our top nude actresses! I hear they’re real and they’re spectacular! Suzy, make an appointment with Dr. Bison, tell him it’s for me. Dang priapism’s back.”
Veracitor says:Next New Comment
March 1, 2024 at 7:20 am GMT • 9.8 hours ago • 400 Words ↑
Barre VT is known for its thriving downtown outdoors nudist scene.
Almost Missouri says:Next New Comment
March 1, 2024 at 8:00 am GMT • 9.1 hours ago • 100 Words ↑
The nice parts of California are legion, Arcata in the north has a thriving outdoor nudist scene (Humboldt College). Et in Arcata ego…
The Germ Theory of Disease says:
Nevertheless, I gather that the point of that 500-word comment was: Since homosexuality has never been known to be wiped out in any time or place, that obviously wasn't the suggestion. It was only that homosexuality, with its attendant social pathologies, such as disease and predation on juveniles, was rare, marginalized and limited.
In fact, even just going back to 1990 would probably be good enough. According to the General Social Survey, from the beginning of the GSS to 1990, 70%-75% of Americans considered homosexuality "always wrong", while only 10%-15% considered homosexuality "not wrong at all". In fact, attitudes became slightly more anti-homosexual through the 1980s after the baleful cultural loosening of the 1970s. Then, starting in the 1990s, "not wrong at all" began a relentless march to it's current 62% majority, gaining legal and cultural institutionalization along the way.
How did that happen? Two candidate causes are
1) the (self-inflicted) AIDS epidemic spun into a "gays are victims" campaign, neatly slotting homosexuals into the latest civil rights 'oppressed' minority group, and
2) a full-spectrum media campaign to portray homosexuality positively in films, television, print, and news.
Who decided that and how did they implement it? I dunno, but it sure looks like an invisible law was passed in about 1991 that said "Thou shalt only portray homosexuality positively".
A side note is that the actual number of adults reporting actual homosexual sex is still relatively small, but it has doubled or tripled in this period from its tiny base in 1990.Replies: @Jack D, @Mike Tre
I recall reading a brief mention (curca 1990) about some self identified “gay family” arrangement in Arizona (I vaguely recall) wherein s group of youngish gay males decided to form a “family” group involving shared property and some sort of businesses. Had some kind of name like “Rainbow Family.”
This was said to be growing popular and members were all greatly enthusiastic to pioneer this new lifestyle.
It may have lasted for a few months or longer towards the end of the mid 80s. Can’t recall exactly.
As you might imagine, the “dawn” of this new free lifestyle of sexual freedom and communal sharing was quickly decimated (or totally ended) by the advent of AIDS.
I doubt if any members survived and there are probably some articles in Mother Jones or left-gay periodicals, newspapers about this.
I was reminded of this effort a few years ago when in Amsterdam in Vondelpark. It was a rare very warm sunny day there and everyone was going as bare as possible in normally rainy Holland.
Wife and I walked by a large gaggle of very tall young (gay, undoubtedly) males practically piled on top of each other soaking up the sun on their nearly naked bodies. Ten at least.
Quite a sight, though more exuberant sun bathing than sexual.
I assumed these guys were friends or in some kind of group outing.
Of course by then the HIV epidempic was largely controlled.
But i was reminded of the story just a few decades earlier which had ended this prior collective group/sexual experiment quite harshly.
“It’s what you think you know, but don’t, that can kill you…”
Steve isn’t hosting an economics blog, nor a foreign policy blog, nor a politics–sturm and drang of candidates, elections, legislation–blog.
He’s doing HBD and general noticing. Actually–the HBD–far more important. The quality of people in your nation is–at the core–the most important thing. Politics and economics downstream of that.
~~
But for the record, people here who think some sort of “collapse” is going to come upend the system–and save us–are wrong.
The commercial real estate melt down itself is ho-hum. Some banks will collapse. FDIC will pick up the pieces–this isn’t 1929. If FDIC is empty, the government will issue more debt to cover it.
The directly economic issue for the US is that it consumes about 5% more than it produces. Probably more like 15% in real goods. And that difference is made up with asset and debt sales. However, the unwinding of that with a slumping dollar, actually makes American industry more–not less–competitive. More jobs will be on-shored. It’s just everything will cost more.
That’s the future–we’ll be relatively poorer. Stuff will cost more. Foreign goods even relatively more. You’ll pay more for food. You’ll pay more for rent or a house. You’ll pay higher taxes. You’ll have to work harder/longer for the same level of consumption–though mitigated by whatever productivity enhancing technological advance.
However, even all of this is small beer compared to the fact that immigration–and dysgenic fertility– has radically remade the US population to be less competent. Americans–your children–will be poorer than they should have been in much more Latin American America.
“If you liked Galaxy Quest, I can’t hate you!”
I’ll take that for whatever it gets me, but the impression I get is that it’s hard to find anyone who didn’t like that movie. It’d be like someone telling you they’re a Coltrane fan even though it turns out the only thing they even bothered listening to was “Kind of Blue”, or that Rogers & Hammerstein cover.
“Galaxy Quest paid homage to Roddenberry’s kinks by disappearing Tim Allen’s shirt at one point…”
I guess that will serve to prepare me for the GRR Martin homages that will inevitably start being made at some point, but given that Martin prefers to do his own Rule34 right from the get-go, maybe it won’t — that may just be too hard to parody.
I've thought since the 70s--I think I read some Psychology Today article--that it (male homosexuality) is most likely some sort of "womb environment" issue, during a critical phase of brain development. Or it could be Cochran's bug. Or both--some bug infecting the mother causes a womb environment that causes the malfunction.
The point is those are things that can be figured out by medical science and potentially prevented. I agree that we may end up in an oddity where most normies abort homosexual fetuses, but the "religious" (woke or traditional) do not and you only find homosexuals in those families.
But ultimately--science marches on--I expect they'll be prevention and this scourge upon humanity will come to an end.Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @Anonymous
No, where homos are expected to marry and have children, as in most cultures, they may actually outbreed straights. Pregnancy is the ideal excuse for getting out of one’s conjugal duties. I know of at least one family where an eventual lesbian outbred all but one of her many siblings.
Note that, while not homos (but worse!), James “Jan” Morris had five children, and Bruce “Caitlyn” Jenner has six.
The kind of people who would abort their children for being less than perfect in some way are going to be outbred by true “normies” anyway. Look at East Asia– every child must be perfect, and the birth rate now hardly replaces one parent, let alone both.
Also, homoeroticism and susceptibility to homoeroticism are different things. The latter is more likely what’s inherited, leaving some more open to relevant environmental factors than others. Even so, that fetus with the “gay gene” may turn out just fine.
While it was true in the past that "being gay" was not a lifestyle (they would stone you if they caught you) and many men who would nowadays "come out" as gay would live as closeted family men and produce children (this happened in mainstream society as recently as Leonard Bernstein and still goes on among Christian fundamentalists, blacks, Muslims and other groups for which open homosexuality is not culturally permissible) on the margin men who tended gay would (more often than their heterosexual brothers) become priests or lifelong bachelors or something gave them an excuse not to marry. So if there was not some offsetting advantage the gen would have faded as each generation had a greater % of straight breeders. But that's not what happened.Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @vinteuil
I've thought since the 70s--I think I read some Psychology Today article--that it (male homosexuality) is most likely some sort of "womb environment" issue, during a critical phase of brain development. Or it could be Cochran's bug. Or both--some bug infecting the mother causes a womb environment that causes the malfunction.
The point is those are things that can be figured out by medical science and potentially prevented. I agree that we may end up in an oddity where most normies abort homosexual fetuses, but the "religious" (woke or traditional) do not and you only find homosexuals in those families.
But ultimately--science marches on--I expect they'll be prevention and this scourge upon humanity will come to an end.Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @Anonymous
You must not be much into the arts (and no, I’m not just talking about modern or “degenerate” art. How many organists and choir directors do you know?) There is clearly a relationship between deviancy and creativity: that is how this whole conversation started, talking about the perviness of sci-fi writers.
The other possibility is there are genes that increase risk of obligate homosexuality by 1 percentage point but for the remaining 99% increase reproduction by 1.5%. If homosexuality reduces reproduction by 50%, then this gene spreads by about 1% per generation, which is very fast.
The problem with this theory is that you’d expect eventually a purer version of the gene that doesn’t raise homosex-risk. But not all such mixed genes can be purified. Otherwise you’d have “clean” versions of, eg, the sickle cell gene.Replies: @Jack D
Not a good example. We DO have “clean” versions of the sickle cell gene. One copy of the gene increases malaria resistance and confers a survival advantage. Two copies gives you sickle cell disease (as well as malaria resistance).
They think something similar may be going on with Jewish neurological diseases – one copy confers an IQ advantage, two copies gives you even more IQ advantage plus the disease. Oops.
https://web.mit.edu/fustflum/documents/papers/AshkenaziIQ.jbiosocsci.pdf
By “clean” I mean an increase in reproductive success without a substantial offsetting cost, like light hair and lactose tolerance 3000 years ago in Europe. Those genes spread extremely fast.
Having one copy of the SCT gene reduces your personal risk of death but increases the risk of death of your offspring by quite a bit. A black with 1 copy has a 7% chance of mating with another carrier and then a 25% chance of producing a doomed sickly SCD infant. An additional 1.75% early death rate of your offspring is a pretty big deal.Replies: @Frau Katze
I assumed, although I never so stated, that after their anti-democratic “victory” on gay marriage, their next pivot would be to bigamy. Instead, they went to normalizing gender dysphoria. Another example of why I’ve stopped making predictions.
Note that, while not homos (but worse!), James "Jan" Morris had five children, and Bruce "Caitlyn" Jenner has six. The kind of people who would abort their children for being less than perfect in some way are going to be outbred by true "normies" anyway. Look at East Asia-- every child must be perfect, and the birth rate now hardly replaces one parent, let alone both.
Also, homoeroticism and susceptibility to homoeroticism are different things. The latter is more likely what's inherited, leaving some more open to relevant environmental factors than others. Even so, that fetus with the "gay gene" may turn out just fine.Replies: @Jack D, @Rich
As Steve as often mentioned, late in life M to F trannies are not homosexuals – they suffer from autogynephilia, a completely separate condition.
While it was true in the past that “being gay” was not a lifestyle (they would stone you if they caught you) and many men who would nowadays “come out” as gay would live as closeted family men and produce children (this happened in mainstream society as recently as Leonard Bernstein and still goes on among Christian fundamentalists, blacks, Muslims and other groups for which open homosexuality is not culturally permissible) on the margin men who tended gay would (more often than their heterosexual brothers) become priests or lifelong bachelors or something gave them an excuse not to marry. So if there was not some offsetting advantage the gen would have faded as each generation had a greater % of straight breeders. But that’s not what happened.
Speaking of identities, it’s time for a real one: Happy St David’s Day! 🏴🏴🏴
Wear an onion on your head, but don’t be dragon your tail or go welshing on your debts. Cawl cennen is really easy to cook.
But sad news:
We can assume St Piran’s on Tuesday isn’t a bank holiday, either. Cornwall 〓〓 isn’t even a principality like Wales, but a mere county. I’m buying our pasties today. Also this week, our daughter’s teacher has seen fewer birthdays than any of her pupils. Yesterday was one of them.
OT — Microsoft used the new AI ascendancy to bring back that stupid cartoon paper clip.

While it was true in the past that "being gay" was not a lifestyle (they would stone you if they caught you) and many men who would nowadays "come out" as gay would live as closeted family men and produce children (this happened in mainstream society as recently as Leonard Bernstein and still goes on among Christian fundamentalists, blacks, Muslims and other groups for which open homosexuality is not culturally permissible) on the margin men who tended gay would (more often than their heterosexual brothers) become priests or lifelong bachelors or something gave them an excuse not to marry. So if there was not some offsetting advantage the gen would have faded as each generation had a greater % of straight breeders. But that's not what happened.Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @vinteuil
Separate, but identical for the purpose of this argument. What one would assume to be a barren condition often turns out quite the opposite.
And, again, the condition itself doesn’t have to be heritable, just a susceptibility to it. Environment gets its turn at bat.
There’s an easy solution: greatly restrict working from home. People must go into the office whether they like it or not. It will save many lenders from ruin, not to mention cities and suburban office parks.
The "Everybody Must Commute Act"? The FBI checking to make sure you are at your office desk?Replies: @Jack D
A friend of mine and his wife have three children, two young men and a young woman. Recently, while sitting around the dinner table, the young woman announced the results of her 23andme test. She was 100 % British Isles.
The problem is that her father, the guy sitting at the same table, the one who raised her, is 100% Dutch.
However, her (English roots) mother’s former boyfriend is 100% Irish.
Her mother is a militant feminist as well as being a vocal, obstreperous in-your-face supporter of homosexual and transgender rights.
I believe this example illustrates polyamory well.
What the feminists have labored mightily to bring about are the conditions in which they would be allowed maximum sexual liberty while parting out the duty to support the products of her womb to whichever man is around to shoulder the load.
In general, women don’t care who takes on the burden of supporting her children. It only matters that someone, some man, somewhere, somehow can be induced to take on the job. The details are something that need to be sorted out by men. If, by virtue of having to pay taxes all men are drafted, then that’s fine. If she can induce some other guy to marry her and adopt her kid, then that’s fine as well.
They want freedom to screw whomsoever they please but don’t want the child to be stigmatized as a bastard. If it takes a village of men to raise her kids, then so be it.
So, the death of patriarchy. It’s fine if she has five children with five different daddies. “You men need to get over yourselves. And you need to organize some way amongst yourselves, pool your money and divvy it up equally to all of us, we women, who need it to raise our kids.” So men, throw your income into a common kitty which will then be divided out equally to all women with kids. Communism for her, capitalism for him. He gets to work like Hell, she gets to party.
Of course, the rub is, as Steve and many have pointed out, men are not incentivized to invest in other men’s DNA and as well, there seems to be a solid genetic basis for jealousy.
Now, tolerance for sharing one’s sex partner vary. It is a bell curve, after all. So, women who want complete liberty should not dictate their lifestyle choice to women and men who value the intimacy of one partner, one family etc.
The Keristan was interesting. One of those bits of information that confirms one’s priors. Not surprised at all about their idea of sexual degeneracy and capitalism being perfectly compatible. They are.
Do what thou wilt is simply Lockeanism taken to a logical conclusion. If everybody “consents” and its all “contractual”, no problem.
J, it can’t be fascist if it is Israel!
Just what I thought. You got nuthin’. It’s not presented as a paraphrase and no one in Israel with any authority has ever said that they want to kill all the Arabs.
OTOH, Hamas has made no secret that they would like to kill all the Jews and they tried to kill as many as they could on 10/7.
In its founding charter, Hamas cites a particularly violent hadith as proof that Muslims need to fight and kill Jews:
Hey, at least we’ve got the Gharqad trees on our side!
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/gaza-nakba-israels-far-right-palestinian-fears-hamas-war-rcna123909
Denying the truth under an image of the Mad Dog, what a coincidence.
------
OT, love the book Dune but this is true, especially of the (book) sequels. It's a major reason why adaptation is so hard.
https://i.postimg.cc/MHTs1fdx/1709334122138927.pngReplies: @Jack D
Time magazine leads the way. You are not cheating on your wife – you are expressing your sexual dissent!
He was a delightful fellow who made friends with whomever he met. Also, he could bargain with Greek merchants and pension owners like nobody's business. Able to get them to meet his price but in a delightful way. If perchance we were to see our pension owner in the public market during the day, he would call out, "PapaSan" in a bright cheery voice and wave enthusiastically. Our landlord would smile broadly and wave back. There was no resisting his charm.
One day, we passed a group of Japanese tourists on the sidewalk of Athens. He said, "Watch this", and tried to engage them in conversation. They recoiled as though he were a snake. After they had passed he explained that most Japanese were so reserved that they could not let their hair down and relax their guard amongst strangers, that he was different. He said his father owned a number of downtown residential rentals in Tokyo, or somewhere. He never lacked for money.Replies: @Jack D
In Japan it’s considered very bad form for a Japanese person to speak to strangers. It’s just not done. If you do it, people don’t know what to make of it. Are you mentally ill or retarded that you don’t know the social conventions (they understand that foreigners might not)?
I always consider it amusing when I go on hikes or bike rides out in the country west of Philly. At some point you pass an invisible boundary that requires you to say “hi” to every stranger that you pass. Inside the boundary there are too many people to make it practical – imagine saying hi to everyone on the NY subway – hi, hi, hi, hi. Japan is a crowded place.
He also told of a cab driver in Bogotá who thought he was weird in bringing up the subject of weather, which never changes. Who would do that? Lindstrom is the guy who talked LEGO out of dumbing down their products 20 years ago, advising them to smarten them up instead-- some of the best business advice ever given. "Small data" can pay off more than big.
“ We DO have “clean” versions of the sickle cell gene. One copy of the gene increases malaria resistance and confers a survival advantage.”
By “clean” I mean an increase in reproductive success without a substantial offsetting cost, like light hair and lactose tolerance 3000 years ago in Europe. Those genes spread extremely fast.
Having one copy of the SCT gene reduces your personal risk of death but increases the risk of death of your offspring by quite a bit. A black with 1 copy has a 7% chance of mating with another carrier and then a 25% chance of producing a doomed sickly SCD infant. An additional 1.75% early death rate of your offspring is a pretty big deal.
The malaria plasmodium can evolve too.
In other trivial news:
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/today-good-day-dei-massive-win-desantis-university-florida-fires-all-diversity-equity
Well, that’s why they call them “hump back” whales!
Wise guy: Have you heard? The Russians have gone to the moon!
Straight man: All of them?
I always consider it amusing when I go on hikes or bike rides out in the country west of Philly. At some point you pass an invisible boundary that requires you to say "hi" to every stranger that you pass. Inside the boundary there are too many people to make it practical - imagine saying hi to everyone on the NY subway - hi, hi, hi, hi. Japan is a crowded place.Replies: @Reg Cæsar
The Danish marketing author Martin Lindstrom said he was struck by how, in America, one was expected to acknowledge fellow passengers when entering an occupied elevator, at the very least with a respectful nod. In Europe, the expectation was to give them space, a “duty to ignore”, so to speak. What is rude and what is polite can be the opposite, depending on where you are.
He also told of a cab driver in Bogotá who thought he was weird in bringing up the subject of weather, which never changes. Who would do that? Lindstrom is the guy who talked LEGO out of dumbing down their products 20 years ago, advising them to smarten them up instead– some of the best business advice ever given. “Small data” can pay off more than big.
Brilliant social commentary.
OT — I just ran across a NAFO shill (yes, that still exists) trying to push that 2016 line about Russians “supporting both sides” of a culture war issue, and people are like, don’t our ruling parties each support one and therefore together support both sides, and his response is to call people Muslims (I am not making this up, I have screencaps). He’s trying to “correct” us on 4chan terminology and not understanding why that doesn’t work. NAFO works off this old PowerPoint of “How 4chan works,” it’s about as accurate as US government intelligence ever is, and they don’t understand why they fail so hard. NAFO is the saddest experiment in regime propaganda ever.
While it was true in the past that "being gay" was not a lifestyle (they would stone you if they caught you) and many men who would nowadays "come out" as gay would live as closeted family men and produce children (this happened in mainstream society as recently as Leonard Bernstein and still goes on among Christian fundamentalists, blacks, Muslims and other groups for which open homosexuality is not culturally permissible) on the margin men who tended gay would (more often than their heterosexual brothers) become priests or lifelong bachelors or something gave them an excuse not to marry. So if there was not some offsetting advantage the gen would have faded as each generation had a greater % of straight breeders. But that's not what happened.Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @vinteuil
I dread to think what query you had to send to send to the AI program of your choice to get that reply.
OTOH, Hamas has made no secret that they would like to kill all the Jews and they tried to kill as many as they could on 10/7.
In its founding charter, Hamas cites a particularly violent hadith as proof that Muslims need to fight and kill Jews: Hey, at least we've got the Gharqad trees on our side!Replies: @J.Ross, @Ennui
Here’s one of several nuthins.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/gaza-nakba-israels-far-right-palestinian-fears-hamas-war-rcna123909
Denying the truth under an image of the Mad Dog, what a coincidence.
——
OT, love the book Dune but this is true, especially of the (book) sequels. It’s a major reason why adaptation is so hard.
Nothing "bursts upon" the mainstream over two decades.
Much better would be, Polyamory may seem to have burst upon the American mainstream, but actually took over two decades to establish itself, only that lacks the hyperbole that content provider Christopher M. Gleason was looking for.
"Ethical non-monogamists." English version: pretentious sex fiends.
Just today, I came across a "thing" in the hollywood reporter which spoke of the murderous heads of a massive drug dealing gang (the Flenory brothers of the black mafia family) as "successful businessmen." (google aided and abetted thr by placing all sort of detours on its first page of results, when I punched in "black mafia family" and "murder." I had to punch in the same keywords at duck duck go, in order to learn anything.)
"American sexual dissent": That's what used to be known as sexual deviancy.
In what passes for American journalism today, maximum clarity has been replaced by maximum confusion. These characters do not want readers peeking into the Wizard's curtain. They see their business as mainstreaming evil.Replies: @Almost Missouri, @Corvinus
“In what passes for American journalism today, maximum clarity has been replaced by maximum confusion”
You should talk.
“A mere $3 trillion of private malinvestment by people who should have known better? Why can’t the normal thing happen in such cases: they eat their own losses without getting the rest of us involved?”
Tell that to Trump, your boy, and see what happens.
By “clean” I mean an increase in reproductive success without a substantial offsetting cost, like light hair and lactose tolerance 3000 years ago in Europe. Those genes spread extremely fast.
Having one copy of the SCT gene reduces your personal risk of death but increases the risk of death of your offspring by quite a bit. A black with 1 copy has a 7% chance of mating with another carrier and then a 25% chance of producing a doomed sickly SCD infant. An additional 1.75% early death rate of your offspring is a pretty big deal.Replies: @Frau Katze
There may not be a clean way to avoid malaria. It just may not be possible.
The malaria plasmodium can evolve too.
Completely OT
General Longstreet of CSA at the age of 77 married a girl of 24. Gutsy man, and Helen lived to 99 collecting a widow’s pension till 1962. She was an absolutely fierce woman. After James Longstreet’s death she would went to war editorially with the daughters of the confederacy as they had made Longstreet one of the primary scapegoats in the “Lost Cause” myth.
Wow! I mean…. Wow!
History compressed from Lincoln & Lee to JFK.
I'm gonna check that out. Never saw the series.
Not only was Clarke into young boys, as a young man he was hanging around in Alistair Crowley's thelemic circles. That is, he was a satanist, which is pretty obvious in his work ( Childhood's End, his Space Odyssey trilogy, etc).
I could go on and on listing the many sci-fi/ fantasy writers who were perverts and weirdos and luciferians. H. G. Wells, for instance, was a self-avowed luciferian. (God the Invisible King, 1917). And a communist.Replies: @notbe mk 2
oh I didn’t know this, thanks for the info but it makes sense because yes there are consistent Satanic themes in his novels Childhoods End the kind and friendly aliens look demonic but its all good that we were taken over by them, in 2010 the new star, the former Jupiter is renamed Lucifer which no-body minds, the world just accepts the former Jupiter is now the star Lucifer etc-I always wondered about this, I always thought that these were bizarre choices but like you said it makes sense if Clarke was hanging out with Crowley
His Mysterious World series from the eighties investigates Bigfoot, UFOs etc is excellent Clarke provides a skeptical opening and closing commentary which was welcome although a bit unusual since most such documentaries are out-and-out credulous This aside, lots of the commentaries feature preadolescent Sri Lankan boys stripped to the waist just hanging around The producers surely could have chosen not to include it in the opening/closing segments but I think they must have been disturbed by their hero’s lifestyle and were dropping discreet hints (at least I hope so and I hope they were not celebrating his lifestyle)-its painfully obvious from the series that Clarke was a molester which like usual only became public after his death so nothing could be done as always
Oh Jeez- now I remember; Mysterious World opened with a skull dominating the screen- seriously Sir A C Clarke was really a f..ed up individual
For everybody else here, Canada has her own version of Jan 6:
Letter from a Canadian Political PrisonerReplies: @Frau Katze, @Voltarde
What makes the persecution of political prisoners from Canada’s Freedom Convoy such an outrage is that Pierre Trudeau was an enthusiastic member of a group that posed a real threat to overthrow the governments of Quebec and Canada.
Closest friends surprised by Trudeau revelations
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/closest-friends-surprised-by-trudeau-revelations/article4300628/
Opinion: An unflattering chapter in Trudeau’s life
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/an-unflattering-chapter-in-trudeaus-life/article1097386/
There’s nothing easy about that in nyc. Even before the kung flu and then illegally elected, nation of islam mayor Eric Adams (2022-), public transportation had become intolerable, due to racist black thugs, even on the buses. By 2016, I had cut back to almost no use of mass transit, and yet since then have had to deal more with assault and battery by black thugs in absolute terms than during the ‘80s and early ‘90s, when I had to use it every day. People are already again fleeing the city like crazy, like during the 1960s, ‘70s, ‘80s and ‘90s, when it was also this bad in public spaces.
Note that, while not homos (but worse!), James "Jan" Morris had five children, and Bruce "Caitlyn" Jenner has six. The kind of people who would abort their children for being less than perfect in some way are going to be outbred by true "normies" anyway. Look at East Asia-- every child must be perfect, and the birth rate now hardly replaces one parent, let alone both.
Also, homoeroticism and susceptibility to homoeroticism are different things. The latter is more likely what's inherited, leaving some more open to relevant environmental factors than others. Even so, that fetus with the "gay gene" may turn out just fine.Replies: @Jack D, @Rich
There’s no such thing as a “homosexual gene”. It’s a supposition and political idea for people trying to justify the homosexual lifestyle. Every attempt to find this “gene” has failed. Homosexuality is simply a psychological disorder, similar to necrophelia or sado-masochism. Many people have been cured of the disorder and more would be cured if the ruling class didn’t push the lifestyle the way it does nowadays.
I tend to agree with you, enough to hang around (or at least site-lurk) the Ruth Institute and Them Before Us, as well as the related Center for Bioethics and Culture*. But relative susceptibility to such disorders, as with things like alcoholism (been to the rez lately?), is likely heritable and certainly varies. However, psychologists have flipped since the successful riots at American Psychiatric Association conferences got the condition dropped from the DSM fifty (!) years ago. Though mere worrying about the condition was seen as sick for another forty: This suggests that viewing it as a mental disorder wasn't as helpful as treating it as a moral disorder, a stance still taken by the Vatican, and showing no signs of ever being changed, regardless of however many poofs may remain in the hierarchy.
*Why are groups like these always founded by women-- in this case, two Jennifers and a Katie? Where are the men? Are we to be saved by Jennifers? At least Mercator is the work of a man, albeit way off in Sydney.Replies: @Rich
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japan_Air_Lines_Flight_123
The cause was a structural failure was caused by a faulty repair by Boeing technicians following a tailstrike incident seven years earlier. When the faulty repair eventually failed, it resulted in a rapid decompression that ripped off a large portion of the tail and caused the loss of all on-board hydraulic systems, disabling the aircraft's flight controls. A contributing factor was the high number of cycles of pressurization/depressurization from the very short flights - 18,800 cycles in 25,000 flight hours. The plane continued flying, but uncontrollably, for another half hour, leaving many passengers time to compose final notes to their loved ones.
It is possible that better, Captain Sully type pilots would have figured some way to make a landing and save at least some lives but the Japanese pilots failed. In the similar United Flight 232 crash, of the 296 people aboard, 184 survived despite the total loss of hydraulics. Another pilot/ flight instructor who was flying as a passenger knew of the earlier crash and had practiced controlling the plane with only engine thrust in a flight simulator and he talked his way into the cockpit.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Airlines_Flight_232Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @Nicholas Stix, @Twinkie, @ThreeCranes, @AceDeuce, @Jim Don Bob
My understanding is that they traced everything to the specific Boeing technician who shot the two bad rivets during the repair.
To some extent, comparing this and Flight 232 must remain apples and oranges. 232 was a DC-10.
Forgive me, because I don’t feel like going over Flight 123 again, so I didn’t read the Wiki article that you linked to, but didn’t at least one person survive the JAL flight?
One who died on the flight was Kyu Sakamoto, the famous singer, who wrote and sang Japan’s only worldwide hit popular song, “Ue o Muite Arukō”, renamed “Sukiyaki” for the English-speaking markets, in 1963. It was a Billboard # 1 hit for three weeks in the U.S..
It wasn't two rivets. The damage was supposed to be repaired with a single splice plate and the tech used two side by side splice plates which were much weaker. The way it was done was 70% weaker and good for only around 11,000 cycles but the plane had done more than 12,000 cycles since the repair. If it had been a long distance plane then 11,000 flights would have been more than the lifespan of the plane but this plane did numerous 1.5 hr. flights every day.
The commonality was total loss of hydraulics used to operate the control surfaces. In 232's case it was an engine failure that shot out turbine fragments that severed the hydraulic lines.
Peter Marshall (Hollywood Squares): It is considered in bad taste to discuss two subjects at nudist camps. One is politics. What is the other?
Paul Lynde: Tape measures.
I always wondered why Caine never had kids with his Guyanese wife. Perhaps they would have gotten in the way of his extracurricular exploits. You gotta wonder if, after he’s gone, and there’s an estate up for grabs, they’ll start coming out of the woodwork.
They have a daughter.
Completely untrue.
A mere $3 trillion of private malinvestment by people who should have known better? Why can’t the normal thing happen in such cases: they eat their own losses without getting the rest of us involved?
Lenders could not reasonably have been expected to know better. Office buildings looked like as sound an investment as any, with no more than the usual fluctuations. WFH had been around for years, back to when it was called “telecommuting,” but had never amounted to much.
And then came March 2020. In the space of little more than a week WFH became nearly universal and offices fell empty. Then, more gradually, the previously anticipated return to the office never materialized, and the offices stayed empty. And now we’re suffering the consequences.
If investors/lenders wanted a risk-free return they could have gone with government bonds and the "risk-free rate of return" associated with that, but they didn't.
Government debt is the one investment that the government arguably has some duty to support.
Larry Niven also had a nudism fetish. It framed some of his stupidest story lines. Everyone wore body paint
But why go naked nowadays when you can wear skin tight Lycra that leaves nothing to the imagination? It’s unacceptable for kids, 20 odds think they are cool doing it (yes, they are hot, no, they have no self respect) and then there are the fatties.
Ugh
That would be because you can always put your clothes back on. With limited exceptions, you can’t stop being black.
Congratulations! You explained the joke!
The Oneida Community was a perfectionist religious communal society ... practiced communalism ... group marriage ... Oneida stirpiculture (a form of eugenics) ...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oneida_Community
My understanding is that the female decedent's of the Oneida weren't cooperative with their mum's communal blah blah blah. Beyond the communal sexual practices, they, both male and female, thought the product of Oneida industry should be retained by the heirs not distributed to the workers. The Oneida probably are the best documented case of the failure of polyamory to be multigenerational.Replies: @From Beer to Paternity
Interesting, I didn’t know about that. I always associated Oneida with one of the Os in the acronym SCOOM (taught to NY kids back in the day so’s they could recall da “native” tribes’ names).
There were a lot of similar shenanigans going on in the ant-Tsarist circles then, too. There, as in America, there was a whole lotta shakin’ going on. The Shakers were cool.
I raised an eyebrow this week when I saw that a band named The Decembrists was playing soon at the 9:30 Club in Washington.
A big lesson I took from experiencing the 1960s-70s and knowing about the previous century: patterns repeat. But there are always new factors/variables being thrown into the same ancient programs.
Not even a wee little bit true?
So. That’s all you took from this, eh.
Nauron! Bring me a new retard to behead! I grow bored of toying with this silly-nilly!
I always wondered why Caine never had kids with his Guyanese wife.
They have a daughter.
To some extent, comparing this and Flight 232 must remain apples and oranges. 232 was a DC-10.
Forgive me, because I don't feel like going over Flight 123 again, so I didn't read the Wiki article that you linked to, but didn't at least one person survive the JAL flight?
One who died on the flight was Kyu Sakamoto, the famous singer, who wrote and sang Japan's only worldwide hit popular song, "Ue o Muite Arukō", renamed "Sukiyaki" for the English-speaking markets, in 1963. It was a Billboard # 1 hit for three weeks in the U.S..Replies: @Jack D
There were only four survivors. A couple of dozen passengers also survived the initial crash, but died while awaiting rescue due to their serious injuries and the extremely remote location of the crash (on top of a 5,000 ft. mountain).
It wasn’t two rivets. The damage was supposed to be repaired with a single splice plate and the tech used two side by side splice plates which were much weaker. The way it was done was 70% weaker and good for only around 11,000 cycles but the plane had done more than 12,000 cycles since the repair. If it had been a long distance plane then 11,000 flights would have been more than the lifespan of the plane but this plane did numerous 1.5 hr. flights every day.
The commonality was total loss of hydraulics used to operate the control surfaces. In 232’s case it was an engine failure that shot out turbine fragments that severed the hydraulic lines.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/gaza-nakba-israels-far-right-palestinian-fears-hamas-war-rcna123909
Denying the truth under an image of the Mad Dog, what a coincidence.
------
OT, love the book Dune but this is true, especially of the (book) sequels. It's a major reason why adaptation is so hard.
https://i.postimg.cc/MHTs1fdx/1709334122138927.pngReplies: @Jack D
“Some of that rhetoric can be seen as potentially genocidal from the way that it dehumanizes Palestinian civilians,” one expert told NBC News.”
These are the same “experts” that claim that Putin is Hitler. Any other time you wouldn’t dream of believing them but when it comes to Israel suddenly they are right. Even the “expert” weasel worded his statement – “some”, “potentially” , inferred from “the way”, etc. At least 3 weasel words in one sentence. You got nuthin. He got nuthin. I want to hear the exact words that you “quoted” and no one said that.
I noticed that you have no rebuttal to the Hamas charter which says that Allah commands us to kill all the Jews – even the trees and rocks they are hiding behind will rat them out, just like it says in the Koran. You don’t need “experts” to interpret the Hamas charter – it’s all there in black & white.
If you can watch an entire sitcom episode you can read the Qur`an. Still, maybe it's time for some Spider Sabitch quiet time in the bathroom.Replies: @Jack D
In any case, looks like their technique worked!Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease, @The Germ Theory of Disease
Well I’ll take that from you as a species of good fortune.
New York City is, if you want to style it that way, a place with more than a few interesting garage sales. My father was descended from a long line of archaic Aran Isles fishermen; my grandfather, the grumpy illiterate Popeye-inflected deep-sea old salt that he was, died before he got a chance to see his grandson directing avant-garde Shakespeare plays at Harvard, but I bet he would have been tickled at the thought of it. My mother came from slightly more refined stock, her ancestors include Lord Dunsany and Saint Oliver Plunkett, Bishop and Martyr, but you know, the Depression and World War Two sort of got in the way of things, so she never got to go places.
My father once bought us a microscope and then just left it on a coffee table in the living room with no explanation, he just assumed we’d figure it out if we felt like it. That was sort of how they rolled.
Crowley was likely British Intelligence as well as a Satanist-oh wait that’s the same thing
There was the rumor Ian Fleming tried to get Aleister Crowley to influence Rudolf Hess because Hess was into the occult too.
https://literary007.com/2014/07/23/occult-connections-the-strange-case-of-ian-fleming-world-war-ii-and-aleister-crowley/
But yeah, the whole Crowley-Hubbard-Parsons-Heinlein thing does sound like the plot of a great alternate/secret history novel. Maybe the Babalon Working actually worked and produced the Sixties, in addition to just getting Parsons laid with Marjorie Cameron.Replies: @BB753
Sci Fi is literature for people who don’t know any better. Every sci fi novel I’ve ever read has been crap. Every sci fi movie I’ve ever seen has been shlock.
Not so much.
https://nypost.com/2023/06/09/women-only-spa-must-welcome-naked-trans-clients-with-penises/
OTOH, Hamas has made no secret that they would like to kill all the Jews and they tried to kill as many as they could on 10/7.
In its founding charter, Hamas cites a particularly violent hadith as proof that Muslims need to fight and kill Jews: Hey, at least we've got the Gharqad trees on our side!Replies: @J.Ross, @Ennui
Not all Israelis. Just the ones creating an impromptu carnival, festival, family outing to prevent food aid getting in.
Heinlein is the 20th century Mark Twain.
In my view, polyamory is a life-style suitable for some kind of urban middle class childless population, essentially egocentric liberal types without serious devotion to any goal in life & whose mantra is "freedom from shackles of tradition". It is a facile & not a sustainable way of life; also, it is very marginal & almost invariably doomed to fail, as stats show- virtually all polyamorous & open marriage arrangements rather quickly collapse. It has nothing to do with polygamy/polygyny, which is a historical, social & economical pattern of marriage- just an "experimental" phase among middle class urban disoriented decadents without children. With children, it becomes complicated & most girls and boys coming from such "families" are damaged for life.
As far as real polygamy- ca. 99% marriages in Arab and similar societies are monogamous. Polygamy is more present, 15% to 30% among some Muslim African societies, but blacks are a race apart from other races, so polygamy among Caucasians and Asians is in reality extremely limited.
So far as the "jealousy" meme goes- it is astonishing that so many proponents of alternative sexual life-styles are so obsessed with it & consider this normal human emotion something to be eradicated. Sexual jealousy is a healthy sign of a true & authentic erotic love. Those who are almost ideologically committed to elimination of jealousy are mentally deranged people, probably encumbered with some hardly explicable pathologies.
Heinlein was, from what I know about his position on these matters, a typical rebellious spirit whose central motif in life was freedom & who was stranger to passions, family & deeper normal rhythms of life. He liked to play games, speculate, probe uncharted territories, explore erotic novelties... but he was shallow, psychologically infantile & definitely not a material for a strong & flourishing society.
Plato, Aristotle, Shakespeare, Lawrence, Dostoevsky & Freud would have dismissed him as an archetype of vitalist & intellectually curious infantilism.Replies: @AnotherDad, @voice, @Anon
Heinlein is the 20th century Mark Twain.
No, you simply don’t know. The scenario you described occurred long before 9/11 when access to the cockpit was far more lenient. THAT is not happening today.
Many planes do not have jump seats in the cockpit (jump seats are far more prevalent in the main cabin). Since 9/11, jump seat usage – esp. of those in cockpits – has been greatly tightened.
a) for Islamistan- they are living in a continual religious stupor & not evolving in the past 800 years
b) for India- they cannot liberate themselves from the basic Hindu cast(e) of mind
c) for east Asia (China etc.)- they cannot be but an anthill where individualism is an alien concept. Hyper-functional anthills.Replies: @Twinkie
Totally. That’s why highly educated Korean young women are giving up their jobs and becoming mothers of 10 children – because they care more about the group than their own individual desires.
Oooops. Not.
https://news.yahoo.com/news/korea-fertility-rate-drops-4th-170315681.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9kdWNrZHVja2dvLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAIifkqdvXl3U1ZRIGGKMuvpVYbWoNOXuQnlDG0xRmg3BBUqw12QRvzl5yCuS_kHd6tswC865Tdr3xnKLsHYf8UHUR5DqQdR-96YulQBOaWGxMC73IqKWKloERCBjS4MxqkCUWkBbYIKKDSdvYwteXzIRag-1al59E4cLqC7Sw5xj
Why did you give me a “troll” button when I stated factually? You can look up the still shots from the film on the internet. Moore’s nipple is clearly visible in several of the photographs.
Having hit those buttons accidentally a couple of times, I went to the opposite extreme and avoid them altogether.
Yes, there are instances where you do see all of what Demi has got for an instant (in the movie theater it would go by in a flash and there's no pause or rewind button) but what she got ain't much. Michelle has several scenes where she bares all for a good long time - there is no missing it.
This was not accidental - in the movie, the Michelle character sleeps with Demi's dad but vice versa does not occur. Michelle is the highly sexualized character. Technically, yes they are both topless but there is topless and then there is topless.Replies: @Twinkie
Try Russian sci-fi. If you think “Stalker” or “Solaris” are schlock than you just aren’t very intelligent. “Slow and pretentious” might be fair criticisms (though I disagree) but they certainly aren’t schlock.
As a Missouri writer, yeah. Heinlein wasn’t as funny as Twain, but I find him more interesting per 1000 words.
This happens on the micro level as well. It's a safe bet that Heinlein did not always check IDs. My own supposition is that he had quite a vigorous policy of aggressively not checking IDs. On the bright side, unlike the typical Poly-Ammonite, he was not fat. In a tradition where Lot's daughters said "Come let us make our father drunk with wine so he will lay with us" and then Lot's daughters made their father drunk with wine and lo he went into them and he knew them Heinlein is squarely astride the tradition. The clear implication of Time Enough For Love is that Lazarus Long has sex with his daughters who are actually his clones.
As Ashley Biden's diary teaches us the current occupant of the Flowers For Algernon Dementia Ward at 1600 Pennsylvania likes to show his penis to people just like LBJ as detailed in Sylvia Choksondik's upcoming Get That Thing Away From Me: Life on the Presidential Detail.
In Tolkien's Middle Earth Legendarium Turin the first human engages in incest with his sister. Tradition is a funny thing.Replies: @SFG, @cthulhu
I’ll go to bat for JRR: it’s pretty common in creation myths, the first couple is literally the only people around.
The Japanese creation myths…
(looks at Dream of the Fisherman’s Wife)
…OK. You’re right.
That’s the joke.
Seriously, I’ve read it explained this way: a man being attracted to women in lingerie isn’t a fetish; it’s normal. A man getting a pile of lingerie and ejaculating on it is.
I never made much of the Satanic conspiracy theories–it was mostly guys who liked getting up in black robes and getting laid, and now women who hate Christianity and hate men–but stuff like this does make me wonder.
There was the rumor Ian Fleming tried to get Aleister Crowley to influence Rudolf Hess because Hess was into the occult too.
https://literary007.com/2014/07/23/occult-connections-the-strange-case-of-ian-fleming-world-war-ii-and-aleister-crowley/
But yeah, the whole Crowley-Hubbard-Parsons-Heinlein thing does sound like the plot of a great alternate/secret history novel. Maybe the Babalon Working actually worked and produced the Sixties, in addition to just getting Parsons laid with Marjorie Cameron.
But there are satanists who are into the hard-core stuff. It's no joke. They do believe in it.
And if you're a Christian, like I am, you're aware that Satan is real.Replies: @NotAnonymousHere
Because movies are meant to be watched at 24 frames per second. If you have to freeze frame in order to make your point, you are trolling.
There were a lot of similar shenanigans going on in the ant-Tsarist circles then, too. There, as in America, there was a whole lotta shakin' going on. The Shakers were cool.
I raised an eyebrow this week when I saw that a band named The Decembrists was playing soon at the 9:30 Club in Washington.
A big lesson I took from experiencing the 1960s-70s and knowing about the previous century: patterns repeat. But there are always new factors/variables being thrown into the same ancient programs.Replies: @ScarletNumber
I haven’t thought about this in years, but we learned that as MOSCOW, with the W standing for “Wow, I learned all 5 Indian tribes” or some such.
For those who don’t get the reference, the book Auntie Mame (1955) was adapted by Jerry Herman, Jerome Lawrence, and Robert Edwin Lee into the musical Mame (1966) which was where the song We Need a Little Christmas was first performed by Angela Lansbury.
Mame was adapted into a movie (Saks 1974) by Paul Zindell. However, ABC didn’t feel Lansbury was bankable as a Hollywood leading lady, so they cast Lucille Ball in the titular role. The problem was that Ball was not only 14 years older than Lansbury but more importantly Ball couldn’t sing.
Neither the musical nor the movie mention the nudist school.
When Ball was young, she was known as the Queen of B Movies, which is a dubious title, like Best AA Pitcher. Not good enough for the big leagues. Then when she met Desi Arnaz, the on-screen chemistry worked. It was lighting in a bottle. She was the Costello to his Abbott, the Stan to his Ollie and I Love Lucy remains funny and watchable even now and deserves a prominent place in the history of television.
After Desi, she was just a washed up old lady and, without Desi as her foil, not at all funny. Why they kept putting her on the screen for another 30 years after that, I'll never know.Replies: @J.Ross, @ScarletNumber
There was the rumor Ian Fleming tried to get Aleister Crowley to influence Rudolf Hess because Hess was into the occult too.
https://literary007.com/2014/07/23/occult-connections-the-strange-case-of-ian-fleming-world-war-ii-and-aleister-crowley/
But yeah, the whole Crowley-Hubbard-Parsons-Heinlein thing does sound like the plot of a great alternate/secret history novel. Maybe the Babalon Working actually worked and produced the Sixties, in addition to just getting Parsons laid with Marjorie Cameron.Replies: @BB753
There are all kind of satanists. Crowley was into drugs and “sex magick”. So was Parsons.
But there are satanists who are into the hard-core stuff. It’s no joke. They do believe in it.
And if you’re a Christian, like I am, you’re aware that Satan is real.
Mame was adapted into a movie (Saks 1974) by Paul Zindell. However, ABC didn't feel Lansbury was bankable as a Hollywood leading lady, so they cast Lucille Ball in the titular role. The problem was that Ball was not only 14 years older than Lansbury but more importantly Ball couldn't sing.
Neither the musical nor the movie mention the nudist school.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8dz03U2eIQwReplies: @Ralph L, @Jack D
But the original Rosalind Russell non-musical movie does mention the nudist school.
His Mysterious World series from the eighties investigates Bigfoot, UFOs etc is excellent Clarke provides a skeptical opening and closing commentary which was welcome although a bit unusual since most such documentaries are out-and-out credulous This aside, lots of the commentaries feature preadolescent Sri Lankan boys stripped to the waist just hanging around The producers surely could have chosen not to include it in the opening/closing segments but I think they must have been disturbed by their hero's lifestyle and were dropping discreet hints (at least I hope so and I hope they were not celebrating his lifestyle)-its painfully obvious from the series that Clarke was a molester which like usual only became public after his death so nothing could be done as always
Oh Jeez- now I remember; Mysterious World opened with a skull dominating the screen- seriously Sir A C Clarke was really a f..ed up individualReplies: @BB753
Very few people know about H G Wells. His role in Lord Milner’s Fabian circle was as a publicist for soft socialism and technocracy ( a lot like Klaus Schwab and the WEF today), although personally he was leaning full-on marxist and luciferian. Again, this shows in his books ( The Island of Doctor Moreau, The Time Machine, etc).
As time goes on and memory fades, people forget this about H G Wells especially in the US where the Fabian Society never really meant anything and historical knowledge is extremely bad (and in UK memories of Fabianism are also fading into oblivion) and in fact even H G Wells himself is in the process of being forgotten
I think this is just a natural process I mean who really cares today about a somewhat small sized left-wing, somewhat elitist public advocacy group that was active a hundred and forty years ago (I think it still might exist as an obscure branch of the UK Labour party) after all we have other things to worry about like AI considering Rosa Parks a white person, but again yes some of H G Wells sci fi writings have a dark, horrible theme to them that after rereading A C Clarke makes one wonderReplies: @BB753
In my view, polyamory is a life-style suitable for some kind of urban middle class childless population, essentially egocentric liberal types without serious devotion to any goal in life & whose mantra is "freedom from shackles of tradition". It is a facile & not a sustainable way of life; also, it is very marginal & almost invariably doomed to fail, as stats show- virtually all polyamorous & open marriage arrangements rather quickly collapse. It has nothing to do with polygamy/polygyny, which is a historical, social & economical pattern of marriage- just an "experimental" phase among middle class urban disoriented decadents without children. With children, it becomes complicated & most girls and boys coming from such "families" are damaged for life.
As far as real polygamy- ca. 99% marriages in Arab and similar societies are monogamous. Polygamy is more present, 15% to 30% among some Muslim African societies, but blacks are a race apart from other races, so polygamy among Caucasians and Asians is in reality extremely limited.
So far as the "jealousy" meme goes- it is astonishing that so many proponents of alternative sexual life-styles are so obsessed with it & consider this normal human emotion something to be eradicated. Sexual jealousy is a healthy sign of a true & authentic erotic love. Those who are almost ideologically committed to elimination of jealousy are mentally deranged people, probably encumbered with some hardly explicable pathologies.
Heinlein was, from what I know about his position on these matters, a typical rebellious spirit whose central motif in life was freedom & who was stranger to passions, family & deeper normal rhythms of life. He liked to play games, speculate, probe uncharted territories, explore erotic novelties... but he was shallow, psychologically infantile & definitely not a material for a strong & flourishing society.
Plato, Aristotle, Shakespeare, Lawrence, Dostoevsky & Freud would have dismissed him as an archetype of vitalist & intellectually curious infantilism.Replies: @AnotherDad, @voice, @Anon
When I read Heinlein in my youth I thought he was a grand troll making the case for one bizarre idea after another. I was saddened to learn some or most of it was meant seriously.
I saw Zefferelli’s R&J when it came out or shortly thereafter at around age 10. Mother took me. To be exposed not only to Shakespeare but an excellent interpretation of that particular play at a young age may have been life changing and not because of a forgettable brief moment in the movie but because it opened my eyes to the possibilities of literature. I soon entered on a path as a voracious consumer of classic literature. That Hussey was perhaps the most beautiful woman of her day only added to the effect. That movie may still be my No. 1 favorite.
Well, you are on a gene-obsessed forum! You mean they don’t explain everything? Horrors!
I tend to agree with you, enough to hang around (or at least site-lurk) the Ruth Institute and Them Before Us, as well as the related Center for Bioethics and Culture*. But relative susceptibility to such disorders, as with things like alcoholism (been to the rez lately?), is likely heritable and certainly varies.
However, psychologists have flipped since the successful riots at American Psychiatric Association conferences got the condition dropped from the DSM fifty (!) years ago. Though mere worrying about the condition was seen as sick for another forty:
This suggests that viewing it as a mental disorder wasn’t as helpful as treating it as a moral disorder, a stance still taken by the Vatican, and showing no signs of ever being changed, regardless of however many poofs may remain in the hierarchy.
*Why are groups like these always founded by women– in this case, two Jennifers and a Katie? Where are the men? Are we to be saved by Jennifers? At least Mercator is the work of a man, albeit way off in Sydney.
Because some commenters have itchy trigger fingers. Sports historian Scarlett has “trolled” me for merely questioning the validity of the DH and bogus playoffs in baseball. Though he was relatively easy on me for preferring the “wrong” lady on a certain sitcom, taking that as “virtue signalling” rather than trolling.
Having hit those buttons accidentally a couple of times, I went to the opposite extreme and avoid them altogether.
…especially at 2h 41m and 2h 46m, respectively! Woman editor, by the way. Was film doctoring as female a profession as body doctoring in the USSR? Do you need a man to say, “This has to be cut”?
If you can’t make your point in 90 minutes, you shouldn’t be in film. Stage plays at least have an intermission, for the audience’s benefit as well as the actors’.
I tend to agree with you, enough to hang around (or at least site-lurk) the Ruth Institute and Them Before Us, as well as the related Center for Bioethics and Culture*. But relative susceptibility to such disorders, as with things like alcoholism (been to the rez lately?), is likely heritable and certainly varies. However, psychologists have flipped since the successful riots at American Psychiatric Association conferences got the condition dropped from the DSM fifty (!) years ago. Though mere worrying about the condition was seen as sick for another forty: This suggests that viewing it as a mental disorder wasn't as helpful as treating it as a moral disorder, a stance still taken by the Vatican, and showing no signs of ever being changed, regardless of however many poofs may remain in the hierarchy.
*Why are groups like these always founded by women-- in this case, two Jennifers and a Katie? Where are the men? Are we to be saved by Jennifers? At least Mercator is the work of a man, albeit way off in Sydney.Replies: @Rich
Calling homosexuality a “moral disorder” is a much better way to put it. The homosexuals I know who were saved from that disorder, were saved by religious institutions and people. I’ve also seen people saved from other moral disorders like alcoholism, promiscuity, kleptomania, etc., by Christianity. I’ve never actually seen anyone saved by psychotherapy and I’ve only seen people temporarily controlled by psychotropic drugs.
In any case, looks like their technique worked!Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease, @The Germ Theory of Disease
Och, goddammit, now you’ve got me talking about books again, you’re gonna wish you never opened your trap.
Sitting right here on my writing desk right next to my laptop and a bottle of good chilled Italian vermouth is a hard-cover first edition of Carl Sandburg’s “Rootabaga Stories” — the same one my AIDS-victim Uncle J. gave me when I was just a sprout, the same first edition I gave to Lorne and Alice on the occasion of the birth of their first son… with the inscription, “Henry, this is the book that made me want to be a writer. So, y’know… read it at your peril.” Only the fire-born understand blue.
I still have the old phone I used when I picked it up and was told that my stuff had just been translated into Czech and Polish, and I had won some sort of kooky Polish award, never really found out what. I remember thinking the Brazilian guys were actually more polite.
Me and my older brother the hockey star, now busy dying of an incurable illness, used to trade signed first editions. He always got the better of me, he actually somehow contrived to get a signed Pynchon. When I asked him how the f$ck he did that, he shrugged and said, “I have my resources.”
Children picking up our bones
Will never know that these were once
As quick as foxes on the hill
(Stevens)
Trust the science!
https://thearkofgrace.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Olivia-Hussey-560x765.jpgReplies: @Rich
That’s terrific. Your mom did a good job getting you interested in high literature. But that was your mom. Usually it’s homosexual men or greasy Lotharios trying to bed young people. There are enough Shakespeare plays available on film without any nudity that teachers don’t have to show the ones with naked actors. You might have been mature enough to watch nudity at 10 (I doubt it) but most kids in high school aren’t.
Technically you are correct but in those days (before Demi got her implants ) and with her long dark hair down in front of her there is very little to see, especially compared to the spectacular Michelle standing right next to her with her hair up in a pony tail and her Playboy quality tatas.
Yes, there are instances where you do see all of what Demi has got for an instant (in the movie theater it would go by in a flash and there’s no pause or rewind button) but what she got ain’t much. Michelle has several scenes where she bares all for a good long time – there is no missing it.
This was not accidental – in the movie, the Michelle character sleeps with Demi’s dad but vice versa does not occur. Michelle is the highly sexualized character. Technically, yes they are both topless but there is topless and then there is topless.
https://www.unz.com/isteve/why-isnt-nudist-an-identity-politics-identity/#comment-6443551
But why go naked nowadays when you can wear skin tight Lycra that leaves nothing to the imagination? It’s unacceptable for kids, 20 odds think they are cool doing it (yes, they are hot, no, they have no self respect) and then there are the fatties.
UghReplies: @ScarletNumber
While you may think so, and while I may personally agree with you, I promise you that this is the uniform of choice for girls from grades 6 through 12. No one has the guts to give them a dress-code violation for wearing them, so they have become the de facto standard in any school that doesn’t require girls to wear dresses, skirts, or khakis.
Ideally they are supposed to be paired with a long t-shirt that serves to cover up their asses, but this isn’t enforced either; only a girl’s individual sense of propriety determines if they do so or not.
I don’t know how these poor boys are able to concentrate.
that H G Wells was a Fabian and technocrat was well know at the time- in fact he was often given as an example of what a Fabian is He was quite public about being a Fabian and later a technocrat That H G Wells was secretly a much harder-line Marxist, even early on, that he let out to be is certainly a distinct possibility that deserves a second thought, after all a lot of his fellow Fabians became Stalinists
As time goes on and memory fades, people forget this about H G Wells especially in the US where the Fabian Society never really meant anything and historical knowledge is extremely bad (and in UK memories of Fabianism are also fading into oblivion) and in fact even H G Wells himself is in the process of being forgotten
I think this is just a natural process I mean who really cares today about a somewhat small sized left-wing, somewhat elitist public advocacy group that was active a hundred and forty years ago (I think it still might exist as an obscure branch of the UK Labour party) after all we have other things to worry about like AI considering Rosa Parks a white person, but again yes some of H G Wells sci fi writings have a dark, horrible theme to them that after rereading A C Clarke makes one wonder
You're wrong. The Fabian Society was just a front for the British power elite which dominated politics and ruled the Empire ( Lord Milner, Lord Cecil, Lord Rothschild, etc).
This group later merged with the American financial elite ( Rockefeller, Morgan, etc) to establish the Anglo-American Establishment, which largely still runs Western countries.
https://archive.org/details/pdfy-A7-BNmZpG-RLOXZZReplies: @Yngvar, @notbe mk 2
"Help yourself to an Ayds, they're delicious. Okay, let's hear the pitch."
"Um, well, hear me out now, this project centers around showing Demi Moore nude as much as possible."
"Demi Moore? Why that's one of our top nude actresses! I hear they're real and they're spectacular! Suzy, make an appointment with Dr. Bison, tell him it's for me. Dang priapism's back."
Veracitor says:Next New Comment
March 1, 2024 at 7:20 am GMT • 9.8 hours ago • 400 Words ↑ Barre VT is known for its thriving downtown outdoors nudist scene.
Almost Missouri says:Next New Comment
March 1, 2024 at 8:00 am GMT • 9.1 hours ago • 100 Words ↑
@Veracitor The nice parts of California are legion, Arcata in the north has a thriving outdoor nudist scene (Humboldt College). Et in Arcata ego...
The Germ Theory of Disease says: Replies: @Almost Missouri
You may be a lawyer, but your comment makes it look like you’re also a schizo.
Nevertheless, I gather that the point of that 500-word comment was:
Since homosexuality has never been known to be wiped out in any time or place, that obviously wasn’t the suggestion. It was only that homosexuality, with its attendant social pathologies, such as disease and predation on juveniles, was rare, marginalized and limited.
In fact, even just going back to 1990 would probably be good enough. According to the General Social Survey, from the beginning of the GSS to 1990, 70%-75% of Americans considered homosexuality “always wrong”, while only 10%-15% considered homosexuality “not wrong at all”. In fact, attitudes became slightly more anti-homosexual through the 1980s after the baleful cultural loosening of the 1970s. Then, starting in the 1990s, “not wrong at all” began a relentless march to it’s current 62% majority, gaining legal and cultural institutionalization along the way.
How did that happen? Two candidate causes are
1) the (self-inflicted) AIDS epidemic spun into a “gays are victims” campaign, neatly slotting homosexuals into the latest civil rights ‘oppressed’ minority group, and
2) a full-spectrum media campaign to portray homosexuality positively in films, television, print, and news.
Who decided that and how did they implement it? I dunno, but it sure looks like an invisible law was passed in about 1991 that said “Thou shalt only portray homosexuality positively”.
A side note is that the actual number of adults reporting actual homosexual sex is still relatively small, but it has doubled or tripled in this period from its tiny base in 1990.
2nd, given those same attitudes and laws it's quite possible that a certain % of people who were attracted to people of the same sex just repressed those feelings and never acted upon them, whereas today they do.
This was not entirely a good thing. 1st of all, being a repressed homosexual is not a good recipe for happiness. 2nd, a lot of times these repressed homosexuals were forced into roles (husband, Catholic priest, etc.) where they made other people unhappy too. Often they maintained the repression for only so long before they acted upon their urges.Replies: @Almost Missouri
Given what Jews endured in the twentieth century, it would be tactless to call these Religious Zionist disciples fascists.
Vladimir Jabotinsky scratches his head in confusion and quibbles, but the fascism was precisely because of …”
Nevertheless, I gather that the point of that 500-word comment was: Since homosexuality has never been known to be wiped out in any time or place, that obviously wasn't the suggestion. It was only that homosexuality, with its attendant social pathologies, such as disease and predation on juveniles, was rare, marginalized and limited.
In fact, even just going back to 1990 would probably be good enough. According to the General Social Survey, from the beginning of the GSS to 1990, 70%-75% of Americans considered homosexuality "always wrong", while only 10%-15% considered homosexuality "not wrong at all". In fact, attitudes became slightly more anti-homosexual through the 1980s after the baleful cultural loosening of the 1970s. Then, starting in the 1990s, "not wrong at all" began a relentless march to it's current 62% majority, gaining legal and cultural institutionalization along the way.
How did that happen? Two candidate causes are
1) the (self-inflicted) AIDS epidemic spun into a "gays are victims" campaign, neatly slotting homosexuals into the latest civil rights 'oppressed' minority group, and
2) a full-spectrum media campaign to portray homosexuality positively in films, television, print, and news.
Who decided that and how did they implement it? I dunno, but it sure looks like an invisible law was passed in about 1991 that said "Thou shalt only portray homosexuality positively".
A side note is that the actual number of adults reporting actual homosexual sex is still relatively small, but it has doubled or tripled in this period from its tiny base in 1990.Replies: @Jack D, @Mike Tre
A number of things could be going on there. First of all “reporting” is an important word. Perhaps in 1990 when (as you say) societal attitudes were still highly negative and there were still sodomy laws on the books in many state, some people did not actually tell the truth back then?
2nd, given those same attitudes and laws it’s quite possible that a certain % of people who were attracted to people of the same sex just repressed those feelings and never acted upon them, whereas today they do.
This was not entirely a good thing. 1st of all, being a repressed homosexual is not a good recipe for happiness. 2nd, a lot of times these repressed homosexuals were forced into roles (husband, Catholic priest, etc.) where they made other people unhappy too. Often they maintained the repression for only so long before they acted upon their urges.
I chose the GSS data because it is the probably the most comprehensive, consistent, cross-refenced, and validated longitudinal social science dataset in America. If it has no validity, nothing else does either, and all commentary is void. Yeah, maybe. I was just reading the data out loud.
It's a worthy question that has already been touched on in some of this page's comments: is it socially better if homosexuals masquerade as heterosexuals or if homosexuals are in some way segregated by their homosexuality? I lean towards the latter, mainly because I think fraud is bad. But I think it is better for society if homosexuals do not act upon their urges, so some degree of discretion, shame, and opprobrium is optimal.
Post-1990 society has (characteristically) made the worst of both worlds: segregated, celebrated and privileged homosexuality, and that celebration is mandatorily pumped back into the heterosexual world.Replies: @Jack D
Even assuming this is desirable, how is it legal? How is it practical?
The “Everybody Must Commute Act”? The FBI checking to make sure you are at your office desk?
Even private employers have a similar interest. If you are Macy's it behooves you to have your office staff working downtown so that downtown is not just populated with lowlifes and junkies. There are virtuous spirals and downward spirals. Covid plus Floyd (esp. Floyd) sent America's downtowns into a negative spiral after decades of recovery and it's in everyone's interest to pull it out of that spiral and make our downtowns livable again.
That being said, no it shouldn't be illegal but it's well within the power of employers and the government can also provide incentives to lure people back downtown. The #1 incentive would be to restore the safety of the streets.Replies: @Almost Missouri
Welcome to investing. A lot of things look like reasonably sound investments. Some turn out to be. Some turn out not to be.
If investors/lenders wanted a risk-free return they could have gone with government bonds and the “risk-free rate of return” associated with that, but they didn’t.
Government debt is the one investment that the government arguably has some duty to support.
2nd, given those same attitudes and laws it's quite possible that a certain % of people who were attracted to people of the same sex just repressed those feelings and never acted upon them, whereas today they do.
This was not entirely a good thing. 1st of all, being a repressed homosexual is not a good recipe for happiness. 2nd, a lot of times these repressed homosexuals were forced into roles (husband, Catholic priest, etc.) where they made other people unhappy too. Often they maintained the repression for only so long before they acted upon their urges.Replies: @Almost Missouri
Maybe, but that’s a hazard with any social sciences data set. The alternative is just throwing up one’s hands and saying there is no such thing as valid social science data. Which I don’t think anyone here believes or they wouldn’t bother commenting here.
I chose the GSS data because it is the probably the most comprehensive, consistent, cross-refenced, and validated longitudinal social science dataset in America. If it has no validity, nothing else does either, and all commentary is void.
Yeah, maybe. I was just reading the data out loud.
It’s a worthy question that has already been touched on in some of this page’s comments: is it socially better if homosexuals masquerade as heterosexuals or if homosexuals are in some way segregated by their homosexuality? I lean towards the latter, mainly because I think fraud is bad. But I think it is better for society if homosexuals do not act upon their urges, so some degree of discretion, shame, and opprobrium is optimal.
Post-1990 society has (characteristically) made the worst of both worlds: segregated, celebrated and privileged homosexuality, and that celebration is mandatorily pumped back into the heterosexual world.
Mame was adapted into a movie (Saks 1974) by Paul Zindell. However, ABC didn't feel Lansbury was bankable as a Hollywood leading lady, so they cast Lucille Ball in the titular role. The problem was that Ball was not only 14 years older than Lansbury but more importantly Ball couldn't sing.
Neither the musical nor the movie mention the nudist school.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8dz03U2eIQwReplies: @Ralph L, @Jack D
That wasn’t the problem. There’s an old Hollywood tradition (which continues to the present day) of using a singer to sing the songs and an actress to act the part, which they could have easily done here.
When Ball was young, she was known as the Queen of B Movies, which is a dubious title, like Best AA Pitcher. Not good enough for the big leagues. Then when she met Desi Arnaz, the on-screen chemistry worked. It was lighting in a bottle. She was the Costello to his Abbott, the Stan to his Ollie and I Love Lucy remains funny and watchable even now and deserves a prominent place in the history of television.
After Desi, she was just a washed up old lady and, without Desi as her foil, not at all funny. Why they kept putting her on the screen for another 30 years after that, I’ll never know.
It's interesting that neither of the Arnaz children ever made it big. Here is Desi Jr visiting his mom on The Tonight Show where she was promoting Mame.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e4rTsFUBnFo
I chose the GSS data because it is the probably the most comprehensive, consistent, cross-refenced, and validated longitudinal social science dataset in America. If it has no validity, nothing else does either, and all commentary is void. Yeah, maybe. I was just reading the data out loud.
It's a worthy question that has already been touched on in some of this page's comments: is it socially better if homosexuals masquerade as heterosexuals or if homosexuals are in some way segregated by their homosexuality? I lean towards the latter, mainly because I think fraud is bad. But I think it is better for society if homosexuals do not act upon their urges, so some degree of discretion, shame, and opprobrium is optimal.
Post-1990 society has (characteristically) made the worst of both worlds: segregated, celebrated and privileged homosexuality, and that celebration is mandatorily pumped back into the heterosexual world.Replies: @Jack D
All social science data is valid but some is more valid than others. If you ask people if they prefer regular or 2% milk, they are not apt to lie to you. If you ask them whether they have homosexual sex or whether they have ever shoplifted, more of them will lie and the % that will lie will vary over time according to how the rest of the society regards it. Just because the GSS data is the best that we have doesn’t mean that it is particularly good on some topics.
This happens on the micro level as well. It's a safe bet that Heinlein did not always check IDs. My own supposition is that he had quite a vigorous policy of aggressively not checking IDs. On the bright side, unlike the typical Poly-Ammonite, he was not fat. In a tradition where Lot's daughters said "Come let us make our father drunk with wine so he will lay with us" and then Lot's daughters made their father drunk with wine and lo he went into them and he knew them Heinlein is squarely astride the tradition. The clear implication of Time Enough For Love is that Lazarus Long has sex with his daughters who are actually his clones.
As Ashley Biden's diary teaches us the current occupant of the Flowers For Algernon Dementia Ward at 1600 Pennsylvania likes to show his penis to people just like LBJ as detailed in Sylvia Choksondik's upcoming Get That Thing Away From Me: Life on the Presidential Detail.
In Tolkien's Middle Earth Legendarium Turin the first human engages in incest with his sister. Tradition is a funny thing.Replies: @SFG, @cthulhu
The story (from the book The Silmarillion, the chapter name is “Of Túrin Turambar”, and it’s explicitly called out as the saddest of the tales of the First Age) is far closer to, say, Oedipus Rex than you’re making it out to be:
First, Túrin was by no means “the first human”; he was several generations removed from the first fathers of Men. Second, the incest with his sister Niniel happened after they had been separated for years and she had been bewitched into amnesia by a dragon; in the end of the tale, both Túrin and Niniel separately committed suicide after Túrin killed the dragon and in its death throes it revealed to Túrin that he was wed to his sister, and after the dragon’s death the spell on Niniel was released and she cast herself into a swift river after realizing what she had done.
So the incest is portrayed as an evil occurrence that, even though entered into unknowingly, was part of the impetus for a great tragedy. This kind of high tragedy is part of the enduring power of Tolkien’s legendarium.
The "Everybody Must Commute Act"? The FBI checking to make sure you are at your office desk?Replies: @Jack D
No, but there is plenty of low hanging fruit. Government employment for one. The city gov. of Philly is gradually pushing its employees back into the office. Since the city has an interest not only as an employer but as the beneficiary of real estate taxes, sales taxes on employee’s lunches, etc. they have a direct interest in having their employees working downtown.
Even private employers have a similar interest. If you are Macy’s it behooves you to have your office staff working downtown so that downtown is not just populated with lowlifes and junkies. There are virtuous spirals and downward spirals. Covid plus Floyd (esp. Floyd) sent America’s downtowns into a negative spiral after decades of recovery and it’s in everyone’s interest to pull it out of that spiral and make our downtowns livable again.
That being said, no it shouldn’t be illegal but it’s well within the power of employers and the government can also provide incentives to lure people back downtown. The #1 incentive would be to restore the safety of the streets.
So if they are doing the opposite of the #1 easy and legal thing to restore city real estate, they can f**k right off with all their roundabout and dubiously licit schemes to try to make up for their signal failure to do their sworn duty.
Even private employers have a similar interest. If you are Macy's it behooves you to have your office staff working downtown so that downtown is not just populated with lowlifes and junkies. There are virtuous spirals and downward spirals. Covid plus Floyd (esp. Floyd) sent America's downtowns into a negative spiral after decades of recovery and it's in everyone's interest to pull it out of that spiral and make our downtowns livable again.
That being said, no it shouldn't be illegal but it's well within the power of employers and the government can also provide incentives to lure people back downtown. The #1 incentive would be to restore the safety of the streets.Replies: @Almost Missouri
Right. Which would be easy and the very definition of legal. Yet they very obviously do not want to do it. In fact they’re doing the opposite.
So if they are doing the opposite of the #1 easy and legal thing to restore city real estate, they can f**k right off with all their roundabout and dubiously licit schemes to try to make up for their signal failure to do their sworn duty.
So what are you saying? That the full-spectrum propaganda effort on behalf of homosex didn’t really have any effect at all, despite showing a very pronounced effect in all available data?
Did it license some people who were already same sex attracted to do what they desired to do anyway? Probably yes.
But why would anybody assume that being an extremely sex-crazy straight man would be a barren condition? Or a condition in any way comparable to homosexuality?
Sure, there’d probably be some kind of adverse effect on reproductive success if these guys advertised on the first date that they’re fetishistic sex pests that take their mother’s underwear out of the hamper to put on and jerk off in. But most of them weren’t stupid enough to shout it from the rooftops. Nowadays, of course, everyone’s supposed to accept that as a normal part of the “gender journey”.
As for the causes of homosexuality, some of the comments in this thread are more suitable for silly Evangelical Facebook groups than any kind of attempt at a serious discussion. I guess it’s one of those topics that makes some people here very eager to disbelieve their lying eyes and cling to whatever ridiculous theory makes them most comfortable, facts be damned. The stuff one gets to read on here…
Any effect in the sense that it “converted” people who were not already same sex attracted? I would say no. Has all the propaganda on behalf of homosex made you interested in having homosex? It’s not like it’s a new flavor of soda – “Try Homosex – now with fewer calories!” Either you are or you are not wired this way.
Did it license some people who were already same sex attracted to do what they desired to do anyway? Probably yes.
Is this your way of telling us you know nothing? That’s not in the Qur`an, it’s in a hadith which is Arabic for “more made-up shit we couldn’t fit in the Qur`an because it was already full of made up shit”.
If you can watch an entire sitcom episode you can read the Qur`an. Still, maybe it’s time for some Spider Sabitch quiet time in the bathroom.
Nevertheless, I gather that the point of that 500-word comment was: Since homosexuality has never been known to be wiped out in any time or place, that obviously wasn't the suggestion. It was only that homosexuality, with its attendant social pathologies, such as disease and predation on juveniles, was rare, marginalized and limited.
In fact, even just going back to 1990 would probably be good enough. According to the General Social Survey, from the beginning of the GSS to 1990, 70%-75% of Americans considered homosexuality "always wrong", while only 10%-15% considered homosexuality "not wrong at all". In fact, attitudes became slightly more anti-homosexual through the 1980s after the baleful cultural loosening of the 1970s. Then, starting in the 1990s, "not wrong at all" began a relentless march to it's current 62% majority, gaining legal and cultural institutionalization along the way.
How did that happen? Two candidate causes are
1) the (self-inflicted) AIDS epidemic spun into a "gays are victims" campaign, neatly slotting homosexuals into the latest civil rights 'oppressed' minority group, and
2) a full-spectrum media campaign to portray homosexuality positively in films, television, print, and news.
Who decided that and how did they implement it? I dunno, but it sure looks like an invisible law was passed in about 1991 that said "Thou shalt only portray homosexuality positively".
A side note is that the actual number of adults reporting actual homosexual sex is still relatively small, but it has doubled or tripled in this period from its tiny base in 1990.Replies: @Jack D, @Mike Tre
We can thank Greatest American Patriot Ever (TM) Tom Hanks for his role in Philadelphia, portraying homosexuals as emotionally stable, monogamous, committed, loyal, hard working, normal and pretty much any other behavior in complete opposition of reality.
Sandra Bernhard played a promiscuous and self-confident lesbian in Roseanne, starting about 1992, apparently. (I haven't seen this show, I'm just going by Wiki.)
The last time I can recall seeing a homosexual character negatively portrayed was the British historical drama Mountains of the Moon (1990), which featured a minor duplicitous character who was homosexual. Even at the time I can recall being surprised that they would combine villainy and homosexuality in one character, so I was already aware that there was a pro-homo campaign afoot. But I probably saw the film a year or two after it was released, so that may have been 1992 or so.Replies: @Mike Tre, @Locutor
One could say it was not exactly a positive portrayal of homosexuality, but it was two young, attractive, up-and-coming stars (River Phoenix and Keanu Reeves) being gay on screen, and as the saying goes, "There is no such thing as bad publicity."Replies: @Mike Tre
Yes, there are instances where you do see all of what Demi has got for an instant (in the movie theater it would go by in a flash and there's no pause or rewind button) but what she got ain't much. Michelle has several scenes where she bares all for a good long time - there is no missing it.
This was not accidental - in the movie, the Michelle character sleeps with Demi's dad but vice versa does not occur. Michelle is the highly sexualized character. Technically, yes they are both topless but there is topless and then there is topless.Replies: @Twinkie
Why are you repeating what I already wrote?
https://www.unz.com/isteve/why-isnt-nudist-an-identity-politics-identity/#comment-6443551
But there are satanists who are into the hard-core stuff. It's no joke. They do believe in it.
And if you're a Christian, like I am, you're aware that Satan is real.Replies: @NotAnonymousHere
And if you’re not a Christian, like I am, I see your belief in a “real” Satan as a symptom of a usually sequelae-free, typically manageable, rarely fatal mental illness.
https://nypost.com/2023/06/09/women-only-spa-must-welcome-naked-trans-clients-with-penises/Replies: @Twinkie
Well, go to Korean spas outside NYC.
https://nypost.com/2021/09/02/charges-filed-against-sex-offender-in-wi-spa-casecharges-filed-against-sex-offender-in-notorious-wi-spa-incident/
Isn’t that what you said?
But it's not what J. Ross says about Putin so it's strange that on the Joo question, he (and you) sound like the furthest out Leftists with whom you othewise don't agree very often.Replies: @Twinkie
When Ball was young, she was known as the Queen of B Movies, which is a dubious title, like Best AA Pitcher. Not good enough for the big leagues. Then when she met Desi Arnaz, the on-screen chemistry worked. It was lighting in a bottle. She was the Costello to his Abbott, the Stan to his Ollie and I Love Lucy remains funny and watchable even now and deserves a prominent place in the history of television.
After Desi, she was just a washed up old lady and, without Desi as her foil, not at all funny. Why they kept putting her on the screen for another 30 years after that, I'll never know.Replies: @J.Ross, @ScarletNumber
There definitely is a problem, a slowing down or an inappropriate amateurishness after years of professionalism, about The Lucy Show (her post-Desi effort).
If you can watch an entire sitcom episode you can read the Qur`an. Still, maybe it's time for some Spider Sabitch quiet time in the bathroom.Replies: @Jack D
Sorry for confusing the hadith for the Qur’ an. Sorry for spelling Qur ‘an Koran. Back in the dark ages when I went to school they didn’t teach us shit like that because they thought that Arabs were a bunch of savages beneath our respect. They also failed to teach us about vudu and santeria. After 9/11 and 10/7 now we understand that Islam is a religion of peace (or is that submission)?
Not really. Putin is AFAI can tell not genocidal and not insane like Hitler. More like the head of a mafia family. He is totally immoral but rational and measured in his violence.
But it’s not what J. Ross says about Putin so it’s strange that on the Joo question, he (and you) sound like the furthest out Leftists with whom you othewise don’t agree very often.
https://www.unz.com/isteve/some-technical-details-on-how-the-ukrainians-pulled-off-their-strategic-feint/#comment-5541937 You seem to be drawing a pretty strong parallel between Hitler and Putin. Or this: https://www.unz.com/isteve/some-technical-details-on-how-the-ukrainians-pulled-off-their-strategic-feint/#comment-5543241 You seem to be channeling a lot of “Can’t appease Hitler, he’d just keep wanting more” onto Putin. I can keep going with lots of your comments. But I think everyone gets the point here.Replies: @Mark G., @Jack D
When Ball was young, she was known as the Queen of B Movies, which is a dubious title, like Best AA Pitcher. Not good enough for the big leagues. Then when she met Desi Arnaz, the on-screen chemistry worked. It was lighting in a bottle. She was the Costello to his Abbott, the Stan to his Ollie and I Love Lucy remains funny and watchable even now and deserves a prominent place in the history of television.
After Desi, she was just a washed up old lady and, without Desi as her foil, not at all funny. Why they kept putting her on the screen for another 30 years after that, I'll never know.Replies: @J.Ross, @ScarletNumber
When I was a kid, I Love Lucy was shown on one of our then-independent stations (5 9 11) every day. Due to Desi’s foresight it might literally be the most watched TV show ever. However, it wasn’t until much later on that I found out that Lucy had two long-running sitcoms after I Love Lucy ended in 1957: The Lucy Show (1962-68) and Here’s Lucy (1968-74). In both shows she was a widow and her male co-lead was Gale Gordon. Neither of these shows were being shown in syndication by the late 1980’s. I only heard of them because of a one-off character played by Sam Lloyd (of later Scrubs fame) in Seinfeld.
It’s interesting that neither of the Arnaz children ever made it big. Here is Desi Jr visiting his mom on The Tonight Show where she was promoting Mame.
But it's not what J. Ross says about Putin so it's strange that on the Joo question, he (and you) sound like the furthest out Leftists with whom you othewise don't agree very often.Replies: @Twinkie
That’s funny. Putting Hitler and Putin in a search among your comments yields 5 pages of results, including these:
https://www.unz.com/isteve/some-technical-details-on-how-the-ukrainians-pulled-off-their-strategic-feint/#comment-5541937
You seem to be drawing a pretty strong parallel between Hitler and Putin. Or this: https://www.unz.com/isteve/some-technical-details-on-how-the-ukrainians-pulled-off-their-strategic-feint/#comment-5543241
You seem to be channeling a lot of “Can’t appease Hitler, he’d just keep wanting more” onto Putin. I can keep going with lots of your comments. But I think everyone gets the point here.
The other countries of Europe have a GDP several times that of Russia and could easily afford militaries large enough to fend off Russia. The real problem for Europe, as here in the United States, is uncontrolled immigration rather than a potential Russisn invasion.Replies: @Almost Missouri, @Jack D
But those who held negative views about clannish, venal Jews back in those same dark ages were, of course, dirty racist antisemites who need to be stamped out theses days, right?
Perhaps Los Angeles?
https://nypost.com/2021/09/02/charges-filed-against-sex-offender-in-wi-spa-casecharges-filed-against-sex-offender-in-notorious-wi-spa-incident/
It’s not an academic difference. The Qu’ran does authentically date from the 7th Century-I wouldn’t hesitate to call it the ultimate 7th Century document, in style and tone. The hadiths were written centuries later. One of the easiest ways of detecting a manufactured hadith (as opposed to one that does contain a kernel of orally transmitted authenticity) is Muhammad addressing topics that wouldn’t have existed in his time and place.
If the Qu’ran is taken literally on its own, without the reams of commentary inserted in by Muslims today, one cannot fail to notice just how “Jewish” proto-Islam really was. This shouldn’t be a surprising statement, given the nature of religion in Arabia at the time: many of the earliest Muslims would have practiced as Jews (or as heterodox Christians-the Arabic word “nasara”, for “Nazorean”, as a descriptor is very telling) at some point in their lives. And rabbis in the 7th Century shared the same apocalyptic, millenarian preoccupations that their religious counterparts from the Lateran to Chang’an had. It was entirely rational.
Regardless of what you believe, Christians and Satanists exist. The former changed the world for the better and created the civilization you live in. Unfortunately, Christianity is in decline. Would you prefer to be ruled by satanists and have society embrace their worldview? Because that is the change we are witnessing today.
What a character! Parsons remind of Putin; a high-functioning lunatic.
That’s a good landmark: 1993. I was trying to think of what were the initial adulatory media portrayals of homosexuals? Will & Grace was an entire TV series organized around adulating homosexuality, but it began in 1998 when the process was already underway.
Sandra Bernhard played a promiscuous and self-confident lesbian in Roseanne, starting about 1992, apparently. (I haven’t seen this show, I’m just going by Wiki.)
The last time I can recall seeing a homosexual character negatively portrayed was the British historical drama Mountains of the Moon (1990), which featured a minor duplicitous character who was homosexual. Even at the time I can recall being surprised that they would combine villainy and homosexuality in one character, so I was already aware that there was a pro-homo campaign afoot. But I probably saw the film a year or two after it was released, so that may have been 1992 or so.
But it's just this side of an absolute that homos are to be portrayed as nothing but heroic or sympathetic or both, and never what they really are.
In the movie Sleepers, (a revenge yarn about homosexual juvie guards raping pubescent aged boys) the word homosexual, nor any synonym, is ever once used.Replies: @Brutusale
https://www.unz.com/isteve/some-technical-details-on-how-the-ukrainians-pulled-off-their-strategic-feint/#comment-5541937 You seem to be drawing a pretty strong parallel between Hitler and Putin. Or this: https://www.unz.com/isteve/some-technical-details-on-how-the-ukrainians-pulled-off-their-strategic-feint/#comment-5543241 You seem to be channeling a lot of “Can’t appease Hitler, he’d just keep wanting more” onto Putin. I can keep going with lots of your comments. But I think everyone gets the point here.Replies: @Mark G., @Jack D
Good comment. Putin is not going to try to take over Europe as Hitler did. The Russians controlled the eastern half of Europe and really received little benefit from it. The average Russian today is better off than Russians of the Soviet era.
The other countries of Europe have a GDP several times that of Russia and could easily afford militaries large enough to fend off Russia. The real problem for Europe, as here in the United States, is uncontrolled immigration rather than a potential Russisn invasion.
The reason (some) people in Russia are better off now is that the USSR was governed according to an insane unworkable economic theory, not because E. Europe didn't contribute to their wealth.Replies: @Mark G.
Today in America? It’d be even worse. It’d be a parade of morbidly obese, tattooed bodies.Replies: @Almost Missouri
I visited what turned out to be a topless beach on the Mediterranean back around the turn of the century. The topless women appeared to be a combination of badly aged European ’68ers flopping about (majority), and what looked like Russian oligarchs’ young trophy wives whose breast implants gave their busts a strangely rigid quality (minority).
It was a bizarre meeting of East and West: youth and beauty artificially heightened and hardened to absurd curiosity vs. the husks of superannuated decadence.
The large, fat, and older husbands of the former lasciviously groped them in the surf, while the similarly aged but less corpulent husbands of the latter lounged indifferently in the sand reading newspapers and smoking cigarettes.
Could I have looked into the future, I might have said that each group maintained its posture as they transitioned into geopolitical confrontation with each other.
The other countries of Europe have a GDP several times that of Russia and could easily afford militaries large enough to fend off Russia. The real problem for Europe, as here in the United States, is uncontrolled immigration rather than a potential Russisn invasion.Replies: @Almost Missouri, @Jack D
Right, there is a real, massive, and ongoing invasion by foreign, hostile, and parasitical fighting-age men, which “our” governments insist isn’t happening, or if it is it’s good, or if it isn’t good we deserve it, while “our” governments insist we fight against a phantom threat that even if it actually happened would probably be an improvement.
The regime policy is as wrong as it is possible to be.
These are people whose family members are being held hostage under brutal conditions (many appear to have died) and it’s not unreasonable of them to suggest that if the Palestinians want food that they should trade it for hostages. Somehow it doesn’t seem fair that they get to keep hostages but the Israelis have to keep feeding them. Maybe 1 hostage for each truck load of food? That would be fair.
https://www.unz.com/isteve/some-technical-details-on-how-the-ukrainians-pulled-off-their-strategic-feint/#comment-5541937 You seem to be drawing a pretty strong parallel between Hitler and Putin. Or this: https://www.unz.com/isteve/some-technical-details-on-how-the-ukrainians-pulled-off-their-strategic-feint/#comment-5543241 You seem to be channeling a lot of “Can’t appease Hitler, he’d just keep wanting more” onto Putin. I can keep going with lots of your comments. But I think everyone gets the point here.Replies: @Mark G., @Jack D
I stand by these comments. There are certain parallels between Putin and Hitler – Putin himself drew a parallel when he said that Poland started WWII by refusing to give in to Hitler’s demands. But there are also differences. They say that history does not repeat itself, but it rhymes.
The other countries of Europe have a GDP several times that of Russia and could easily afford militaries large enough to fend off Russia. The real problem for Europe, as here in the United States, is uncontrolled immigration rather than a potential Russisn invasion.Replies: @Almost Missouri, @Jack D
Russia received a LOT of benefits by controlling eastern Europe. The satellites were forced to supply the Soviets with products at cut rates. E. Germany was the USSR’s supplier for chips, for optics, etc.
The reason (some) people in Russia are better off now is that the USSR was governed according to an insane unworkable economic theory, not because E. Europe didn’t contribute to their wealth.
In September 2023 at an economic forum Putin acknowledged this was a mistake. He then said America is now making the same mistake. We put pressure on our allies. We have no friends, only interests, and our interests increasingly go against their interests.Replies: @Jack D
The reason (some) people in Russia are better off now is that the USSR was governed according to an insane unworkable economic theory, not because E. Europe didn't contribute to their wealth.Replies: @Mark G.
You need to look at both sides of the ledger. There were benefits but also costs. Those countries hated Russia so Russia had to maintain a large military to keep them under control. On a couple occasions, Hungary in 1956 and Czechoslovakia in 1968, Russia had to send the military in to quell uprisings.
In September 2023 at an economic forum Putin acknowledged this was a mistake. He then said America is now making the same mistake. We put pressure on our allies. We have no friends, only interests, and our interests increasingly go against their interests.
With regard to support for Ukraine, if anything our allies are out ahead of us. The closer they are to the Russian border the more they support Ukraine because they know that they are next.Replies: @Twinkie
There wasn’t enough nudity in that film to have any effect one way or the other. If you’ve got evidence that a 1 second flash of a breast on a moving person is consequentially negative for child moral development provide it. Kids were raised in one room cabins for generations. You think that children never saw or heard things?
There was about a 30 year period where the Hays Code forbade all nudity in mainstream movies which also coincided with the period of low immigration enforced by the 1924 Immigration Act and with America's status as the victor of WWII (for example in 1950, the US produced 75% of the world output of automobiles). This Golden Age also coincided with the childhood of many Men of Unz so they regard these things together as being the real America when in fact it was just a moment in time that could not be sustained.
As time goes on and memory fades, people forget this about H G Wells especially in the US where the Fabian Society never really meant anything and historical knowledge is extremely bad (and in UK memories of Fabianism are also fading into oblivion) and in fact even H G Wells himself is in the process of being forgotten
I think this is just a natural process I mean who really cares today about a somewhat small sized left-wing, somewhat elitist public advocacy group that was active a hundred and forty years ago (I think it still might exist as an obscure branch of the UK Labour party) after all we have other things to worry about like AI considering Rosa Parks a white person, but again yes some of H G Wells sci fi writings have a dark, horrible theme to them that after rereading A C Clarke makes one wonderReplies: @BB753
“As time goes on and memory fades, people forget this about H G Wells especially in the US where the Fabian Society never really meant anything ”
You’re wrong. The Fabian Society was just a front for the British power elite which dominated politics and ruled the Empire ( Lord Milner, Lord Cecil, Lord Rothschild, etc).
This group later merged with the American financial elite ( Rockefeller, Morgan, etc) to establish the Anglo-American Establishment, which largely still runs Western countries.
https://archive.org/details/pdfy-A7-BNmZpG-RLOXZZ
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/feb/28/anant-ambani-wedding-son-indias-richest-person-mukesh-celebrity-guest-list
https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cpsprodpb/1442B/production/_132778928_capture.jpgIt's not Rothschilds.Replies: @BB753
Have you been around teenagers when nudity is shown? They get very silly. One or two might act maturely, but that’s it. It isn’t necessary, so why show it? Henry V is a better play anyway.
Also, at least since the Renaissance it has been a convention that nudity is permitted in connection with art.
There was about a 30 year period where the Hays Code forbade all nudity in mainstream movies which also coincided with the period of low immigration enforced by the 1924 Immigration Act and with America’s status as the victor of WWII (for example in 1950, the US produced 75% of the world output of automobiles). This Golden Age also coincided with the childhood of many Men of Unz so they regard these things together as being the real America when in fact it was just a moment in time that could not be sustained.
In September 2023 at an economic forum Putin acknowledged this was a mistake. He then said America is now making the same mistake. We put pressure on our allies. We have no friends, only interests, and our interests increasingly go against their interests.Replies: @Jack D
Putin remakes history to suit whatever his agenda is at the moment. He would LOVE to restore the Russian sphere of influence in E. Europe.
With regard to support for Ukraine, if anything our allies are out ahead of us. The closer they are to the Russian border the more they support Ukraine because they know that they are next.
That’s a question for the filmmaker. A viewer doesn’t need to understand every choice made by an artist to get value out of the art. And for kids it gives the child a sense of the possible. I’m glad I learned at an early age that movies could be something more than Herbie the Love Bug.
I admit that free-range mental patients exist but don’t assent to the delusions, e.g. God and Satan, caused by their disorders. I certainly don’t look to them for advice or education.
“Being attracted to the nude female body is a fetish?”
Yuks aside (good as they are), I’ll point out that Steve S. referred to a “nudism” fetish. I’ve never been in a nudist situation, so admittedly I’m conjecturing. But I would think there’s a big difference between being in private with a nekkid woman, whom you usually don’t see nekkid, with romantic mutual intent, contrasted with seeing everybody naked, women included, doing everyday social things, not to include doing the horizontal tango. The first is exciting; the second, I’d think, would be pretty banal. If I had some compelling attraction to the second, that would seem like a fetish.
You're wrong. The Fabian Society was just a front for the British power elite which dominated politics and ruled the Empire ( Lord Milner, Lord Cecil, Lord Rothschild, etc).
This group later merged with the American financial elite ( Rockefeller, Morgan, etc) to establish the Anglo-American Establishment, which largely still runs Western countries.
https://archive.org/details/pdfy-A7-BNmZpG-RLOXZZReplies: @Yngvar, @notbe mk 2
Wanna re-focus your compass a bit:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/feb/28/anant-ambani-wedding-son-indias-richest-person-mukesh-celebrity-guest-list
It’s not Rothschilds.
Sandra Bernhard played a promiscuous and self-confident lesbian in Roseanne, starting about 1992, apparently. (I haven't seen this show, I'm just going by Wiki.)
The last time I can recall seeing a homosexual character negatively portrayed was the British historical drama Mountains of the Moon (1990), which featured a minor duplicitous character who was homosexual. Even at the time I can recall being surprised that they would combine villainy and homosexuality in one character, so I was already aware that there was a pro-homo campaign afoot. But I probably saw the film a year or two after it was released, so that may have been 1992 or so.Replies: @Mike Tre, @Locutor
Billy Crystal apparently played the first openly homosexual character on a TV show in SOAP. Jack Tripper was merely pretending to be one. Johnny from Aiplane! was an early memorable flaming homo but I’m pretty sure Mel Brooks had already done that bit in one of his flicks.
But it’s just this side of an absolute that homos are to be portrayed as nothing but heroic or sympathetic or both, and never what they really are.
In the movie Sleepers, (a revenge yarn about homosexual juvie guards raping pubescent aged boys) the word homosexual, nor any synonym, is ever once used.
There was also My Own Private Idaho in 1991 (one of the few movies I walked out of because it was so stupid and distasteful).
One could say it was not exactly a positive portrayal of homosexuality, but it was two young, attractive, up-and-coming stars (River Phoenix and Keanu Reeves) being gay on screen, and as the saying goes, “There is no such thing as bad publicity.”
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/feb/28/anant-ambani-wedding-son-indias-richest-person-mukesh-celebrity-guest-list
https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cpsprodpb/1442B/production/_132778928_capture.jpgIt's not Rothschilds.Replies: @BB753
I said the West. Obviously, the Anglo-American Establishment is in decline. This is what BRICs means ultimately.
Yuks aside (good as they are), I'll point out that Steve S. referred to a "nudism" fetish. I've never been in a nudist situation, so admittedly I'm conjecturing. But I would think there's a big difference between being in private with a nekkid woman, whom you usually don't see nekkid, with romantic mutual intent, contrasted with seeing everybody naked, women included, doing everyday social things, not to include doing the horizontal tango. The first is exciting; the second, I'd think, would be pretty banal. If I had some compelling attraction to the second, that would seem like a fetish.Replies: @Mike Tre
So if nudism is just a preference to be nekked, opposed to a sexual stimulus, is it even a fetish?
One could say it was not exactly a positive portrayal of homosexuality, but it was two young, attractive, up-and-coming stars (River Phoenix and Keanu Reeves) being gay on screen, and as the saying goes, "There is no such thing as bad publicity."Replies: @Mike Tre
I walked out of The Crying Game when the big reveal happened.
That movie was more like a mass face raping. Millions of people were suckered into theaters on the premise of a romantic drama set against The Troubles of Northern Ireland only to be tricked into looking at a mulatto's penis and learning the sympathetic Forest Whitaker character was actually a homo that you, the audience, had been sympathizing with. Then, to complete the betrayal of the audience, the protagonist, who is the stand-in for the audience since it is though his eyes that the audience goes through the penis-viewing and discovery of homosexuality, forgives the tranny for deceiving him, and by implication for deceiving us, the audience.
Another one I had forgotten about was Four Weddings and a Funeral (1994), where the straight characters are depicted as flighty, promiscuous, feckless, and silly, while the homosexual characters are stolid, loyal, sober, and noble.
The early '90s was really the inflection point: first the gay characters got center stage in a transgressive but "cool" way in My Own Private Idaho (1991), The Crying Game (1992), and Roseanne, then they became the bourgeois pillars in Philadelphia (1993), Four Weddings and a Funeral (1994), and eventually Will & Grace. At that point, it was just a matter of time before David French would start writing "The Conservative Case for Homosexuality" editorials.Replies: @Twinkie
So, you believe that the world, or part thereof ( Europe, Asia Minor, America) has been run by lunatics for nearly 2,000 years? Are the woke or transhumanist atheists any saner?
You're wrong. The Fabian Society was just a front for the British power elite which dominated politics and ruled the Empire ( Lord Milner, Lord Cecil, Lord Rothschild, etc).
This group later merged with the American financial elite ( Rockefeller, Morgan, etc) to establish the Anglo-American Establishment, which largely still runs Western countries.
https://archive.org/details/pdfy-A7-BNmZpG-RLOXZZReplies: @Yngvar, @notbe mk 2
perhaps, I haven’t given Fabianism much thought
Oh yeah, I had forgotten about that one … 1992.
That movie was more like a mass face raping. Millions of people were suckered into theaters on the premise of a romantic drama set against The Troubles of Northern Ireland only to be tricked into looking at a mulatto’s penis and learning the sympathetic Forest Whitaker character was actually a homo that you, the audience, had been sympathizing with. Then, to complete the betrayal of the audience, the protagonist, who is the stand-in for the audience since it is though his eyes that the audience goes through the penis-viewing and discovery of homosexuality, forgives the tranny for deceiving him, and by implication for deceiving us, the audience.
Another one I had forgotten about was Four Weddings and a Funeral (1994), where the straight characters are depicted as flighty, promiscuous, feckless, and silly, while the homosexual characters are stolid, loyal, sober, and noble.
The early ’90s was really the inflection point: first the gay characters got center stage in a transgressive but “cool” way in My Own Private Idaho (1991), The Crying Game (1992), and Roseanne, then they became the bourgeois pillars in Philadelphia (1993), Four Weddings and a Funeral (1994), and eventually Will & Grace. At that point, it was just a matter of time before David French would start writing “The Conservative Case for Homosexuality” editorials.
With regard to support for Ukraine, if anything our allies are out ahead of us. The closer they are to the Russian border the more they support Ukraine because they know that they are next.Replies: @Twinkie
You reading minds again?
The Russian military has scrupulously avoided infringing on the borders of NATO countries, including Poland that has been supplying Ukraine. Putin has been pretty crystal clear that he has no designs on NATO countries.
You are talking out of your ass again.
First of all, the US has borne the largest fraction of the aid to Ukraine: https://www.usnews.com/news/best-countries/articles/these-countries-have-committed-the-most-aid-to-ukraine
And even among the European countries, the pattern is somewhat incongruous with the physical distance to the conflict. While nearby countries such as Estonia and Poland have given more per capita than others farther away, more distant countries such as Norway and Denmark have given more per capita than Germany, Romania, and Hungary (even the far distant Spain has given more than the latter two countries).
The aid given by Europeans countries have less to do with physical proximity to the conflict so much as the reigning ideology and the closeness to the U.S. in each donor country.
Putin has stayed well clear of NATO because (1) he doesn't want a nuclear war, (2) he understands that in any conventional war NATO would beat the crap out of his army since even Ukraine's 3rd rate army has been able to fight it to a stalemate and (3) he hopes that this (plus a little nuclear saber rattling) will encourage NATO to stay out of Ukraine as well.Replies: @Twinkie
That movie was more like a mass face raping. Millions of people were suckered into theaters on the premise of a romantic drama set against The Troubles of Northern Ireland only to be tricked into looking at a mulatto's penis and learning the sympathetic Forest Whitaker character was actually a homo that you, the audience, had been sympathizing with. Then, to complete the betrayal of the audience, the protagonist, who is the stand-in for the audience since it is though his eyes that the audience goes through the penis-viewing and discovery of homosexuality, forgives the tranny for deceiving him, and by implication for deceiving us, the audience.
Another one I had forgotten about was Four Weddings and a Funeral (1994), where the straight characters are depicted as flighty, promiscuous, feckless, and silly, while the homosexual characters are stolid, loyal, sober, and noble.
The early '90s was really the inflection point: first the gay characters got center stage in a transgressive but "cool" way in My Own Private Idaho (1991), The Crying Game (1992), and Roseanne, then they became the bourgeois pillars in Philadelphia (1993), Four Weddings and a Funeral (1994), and eventually Will & Grace. At that point, it was just a matter of time before David French would start writing "The Conservative Case for Homosexuality" editorials.Replies: @Twinkie
Agree. Don’t forget Tony Kushner’s “Angels in America: A Gay Fantasia on National Themes” was published between 1991-1992 and made the Broadway debut in 1993. It won the Pulitzer and the Tony. I think that 1991-1994 was definitely the inflection point in the homosexualization of America, during which homosexuality was pervasively and positively portrayed in the mainstream media.
In his interview with Carlson, Putin mentions Poland 36 times. You don’t have to be a mind reader – you can check the transcript. For a place that he is NOT thinking about invading, he sure mentions Poland a lot.
That’s funny, because until the day that he invaded, he was “crystal clear” that he has no designs on Ukraine either. The Men of Unz believed him the last time so I suppose you’ll believe him again this time too. Some people never learn.
Putin has stayed well clear of NATO because (1) he doesn’t want a nuclear war, (2) he understands that in any conventional war NATO would beat the crap out of his army since even Ukraine’s 3rd rate army has been able to fight it to a stalemate and (3) he hopes that this (plus a little nuclear saber rattling) will encourage NATO to stay out of Ukraine as well.
I wonder how much of it is because people value personal privacy even more now that "there is no such a thing as privacy" or because everyone has mobile phones. Or perhaps because of the "rise" of open homosexuality and even transgenderism.
I also think of about whether this is now tied to kids not playing outside together without adult supervision like in the old days and it's all supervised playdates (and no sleepovers either).Replies: @TWS
I’m thinking it’s because everything is now sexualized. People today can’t imagine two naked people without sex involved. I agree there’s something to the weird helicopter parents and risk-aversion.
Pair bonding, according to anthropological doctrine, ensures greater success of offspring. In humans and many other animals, harems tend to produce disgruntled unsuccessful males who cuck the alphas when they are off on a hunting expedition, thus putting loser genes back in play to the detriment of overall group fitness. Whereas, in wolves, harems prevent poodles developing instead of badass killers.
I think the confusion of genetic value between natural urges of polyamory and pair bonding, can be resolved in a hierarchy of selection value. Sexual urge begins offspring production (reproduction of the selfish genes), and for a man whose selfish gene imperative is replication, mating with many women is a natural urge. But although polyamory is widespread in biology, that is only because ecologies entertain many models of biologic evolution, and any given moment in evolution is not the same price discovery as the hindsight of ultimate success or failure in extinction.
Humans are somewhat different from say goats in the long developmental stage of our kin, so dependent on their parents for food and protection. Whereas young goats can run on sheer cliffs in their first week, humans raise toddlers. Women want to mate with a man who will assist her in raising her replicated genes, during the long juvenile development phase of humanity. Children need both maternal love and paternal stoicism to succeed in a natural ecology. In the modern human zoos (tip of the hat to Desmond Morris) , wild ecology is no longer visible to most, and the urbanized industrial era of the last two centuries has witnessed the rise of communism, where zookeepers provide daily rations, and the inmates are now neurotic Freudians. Freud in 1912 upon arrival in NYC said, “We are the plague.”
Sixties communes like Olompali tried to replace pair bonded raising of children with communal raising, one of the formats of jewish communism, the dissolution of family units, in favor of a promised better redistributional and educational model that turns out to be a mirage, in poverty and failure.
I was right there in Berkeley in the late sixties, and still consider myself a hippie, without the communism. The following economic/social justification for pair bonding over polyamory is simply a personal theory from my direct experience. From seeing the Bolshevik weathermen arise with communes out of the ashes of starry eyed hippiedom, I know firsthand how things can evolve socially. We were forced into the political left by resisting war on Vietnam. Scamdemic “emergency authoritarianism” forced us back out of the political left, for good. Evolution for all its complexity and successes, is full of failures and extinction.
My theory is that communes, polyamory, and Bolshevism arose to remove the truly capitalist tendency of mom and pop businesses to create human goodwill dealing with other pair bonds in price discovery, contract and trust. When the communist lockdowns hit in 2020, they impacted mom and pops the most, and it wasn’t just cohencidence. This experience of devastation in the mom and pops, and the rise in jewish bank central credit redistribution, inflation in prices to unaffordability for the middle class, which relies mainly now on debt finance, shows the second function of pair bond mating is economic, the formation of productive/reproductive partnerships watching each other’s back and thriving together, which is much harder naturally in communes that prescribe redistribution to anyone who needs it regardless of production effort. We have seen the disastrous results of monetary inflation created to pay for things for all, regardless of diminishing production, especially during lockdowns. Thus you have to look at polyamory being Freudian and jewish not just sexually but economically. It is designed to ruin nations and cull humanity by evolutionary failure, or by “cultural determinism” cloaked in a flawed philosophical wokism.
I doubt Heinlein could figure out his own gestalt. I doubt he ever experienced the full value of pair bonding. He sold fantasy just like Jacob R, and now they are dead. Why live in a dream world? You can theoretically trust your partner assuming you made a lucky choice, and that can pay dividends in mutual support and love when you get older and need someone who is a help, confidant, and who shares your experience. Plus you are helping your offspring raise theirs by babysitting. The genetic dilution of your genes is by one half per generation so in your grandkids’ success, you share in one fourth partnership as a selfish gene imperative.
There is literally nothing in biology more powerful than that.
So for lifelong and hereditary success, choose well, men. The sexual pleasure of knocking up a psycho woke bitch would evaporate raising her kid and having to hang out with someone who loses their physical beauty naked rapidly after age forty. Women traditionally chose well for lifelong bonding, among us males displaying our traits to attract them. Both sexes share the same genes for traits that are attractive to the two sexes. When you limit the choice to physical appearance of naked bodies, you only know who has physical genetic characteristics that trigger your genetic preference; it unfortunately does not tell you who might have your back for the rest of your life.
Divorce is just one syndrome of the modern inefficient selection of mates which has been largely skewed by Freudian mindfuckery and communism in the modern era of universal deception ripe for titillations. We are in a human zoo. There is not enough price discovery in the programs of people who want us to surrender up mom and pop economy and sexual pair bonding, and being forced into feeding on human zoo fodder only guarantees a neurotic population chasing deep satisfaction. A mirage just over the hill like sci fi.
Putin has stayed well clear of NATO because (1) he doesn't want a nuclear war, (2) he understands that in any conventional war NATO would beat the crap out of his army since even Ukraine's 3rd rate army has been able to fight it to a stalemate and (3) he hopes that this (plus a little nuclear saber rattling) will encourage NATO to stay out of Ukraine as well.Replies: @Twinkie
That’s because Poland has been – literally – the staging ground for all the Western supplies flowing into Ukraine. Even before this war started, I heard from some American sources in Poland that the Poles were “itching for a war.” Poles have been arming aggressively (Poland is about to acquire a giant fleet of hyper-modern tanks, both the American Abrams and the South Korean Black Panthers, so much so that it is being heralded as becoming “a tank superpower”). They aren’t doing this with Germany in mind.
Sounds exactly like he has no designs on any NATO country.
And, as usual, no admission that you were wrong about distance to the conflict and scale of aid.
But it's just this side of an absolute that homos are to be portrayed as nothing but heroic or sympathetic or both, and never what they really are.
In the movie Sleepers, (a revenge yarn about homosexual juvie guards raping pubescent aged boys) the word homosexual, nor any synonym, is ever once used.Replies: @Brutusale
Mel Brooks never disappoints. From Blazing Saddles, 1974.
90 minutes is a completely arbitrary time mostly based on the size of film reels and scheduling needs. A movie should be as long as it should be, whether 12 minutes (like The Lounge Bar) or 12 hours (like The Lord of the Rings).
Longer Soviet films actually were shown with intermissions. I feel like this was once the case in the US as well. Makes sense as an excuse to sell more popcorn and soda, curious that that custom disappeared.
Sandra Bernhard played a promiscuous and self-confident lesbian in Roseanne, starting about 1992, apparently. (I haven't seen this show, I'm just going by Wiki.)
The last time I can recall seeing a homosexual character negatively portrayed was the British historical drama Mountains of the Moon (1990), which featured a minor duplicitous character who was homosexual. Even at the time I can recall being surprised that they would combine villainy and homosexuality in one character, so I was already aware that there was a pro-homo campaign afoot. But I probably saw the film a year or two after it was released, so that may have been 1992 or so.Replies: @Mike Tre, @Locutor
The Talented Mr. Ripley some years later.
iSteve has a healthy Catholic dislike of Ayn Rand, but this is silly.
She spent all her time writing. The ‘Collective’ of young Jews met with their Rabbi once weekly to read her latest chapter of Atlas Shrugged.
Rand pursued a affair with a young acolyte and went into business with him (lectures, tapes, essays and philosophy books).
This was a Rabbinical circle, not a cult.
Those states are community property states de jure; i.e., it’s the law. The ones that are not de jure are de facto. Try getting divorced in any state in the US and you will be splitting things 50-50.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japan_Air_Lines_Flight_123
The cause was a structural failure was caused by a faulty repair by Boeing technicians following a tailstrike incident seven years earlier. When the faulty repair eventually failed, it resulted in a rapid decompression that ripped off a large portion of the tail and caused the loss of all on-board hydraulic systems, disabling the aircraft's flight controls. A contributing factor was the high number of cycles of pressurization/depressurization from the very short flights - 18,800 cycles in 25,000 flight hours. The plane continued flying, but uncontrollably, for another half hour, leaving many passengers time to compose final notes to their loved ones.
It is possible that better, Captain Sully type pilots would have figured some way to make a landing and save at least some lives but the Japanese pilots failed. In the similar United Flight 232 crash, of the 296 people aboard, 184 survived despite the total loss of hydraulics. Another pilot/ flight instructor who was flying as a passenger knew of the earlier crash and had practiced controlling the plane with only engine thrust in a flight simulator and he talked his way into the cockpit.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Airlines_Flight_232Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @Nicholas Stix, @Twinkie, @ThreeCranes, @AceDeuce, @Jim Don Bob
The Japanese refused immediate US search and rescue help and several passengers who survived the crash froze to death over night before Japanese help arrived the next morning.
I read Have Spaesuit, Will Travel when I was 10. Never read anything else until just recently I listed to most of an audiobook of The Moon is a Harsh Mistress. Boring and preachy and unrealistic. They are growing grain on the moon? C’mon.
If you’re going to lie, at least try to sound plausible.
Sitting right here on my writing desk right next to my laptop and a bottle of good chilled Italian vermouth is a hard-cover first edition of Carl Sandburg's "Rootabaga Stories" -- the same one my AIDS-victim Uncle J. gave me when I was just a sprout, the same first edition I gave to Lorne and Alice on the occasion of the birth of their first son... with the inscription, "Henry, this is the book that made me want to be a writer. So, y'know... read it at your peril." Only the fire-born understand blue.
I still have the old phone I used when I picked it up and was told that my stuff had just been translated into Czech and Polish, and I had won some sort of kooky Polish award, never really found out what. I remember thinking the Brazilian guys were actually more polite.
Me and my older brother the hockey star, now busy dying of an incurable illness, used to trade signed first editions. He always got the better of me, he actually somehow contrived to get a signed Pynchon. When I asked him how the f$ck he did that, he shrugged and said, "I have my resources."
Children picking up our bones
Will never know that these were once
As quick as foxes on the hill
(Stevens)Replies: @vinteuil
Wallace Stevens cast a cold eye on life, on death.