The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 TeasersiSteve Blog
The Fundamental Issue of 2020
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

From my new weekly column in Taki’s Magazine:

Our New Planet Is Going to Be Great!

by Steve Sailer, July 17, 2019

The fundamental issue of the 2020 presidential campaign is rapidly becoming whether or not America’s whites, as exemplified in the person of Donald Trump, have the right to block the world’s blacks and Muslims, as exemplified in the person of Somalia-born Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN), from immigrating en masse to the United States.

Or is the entire notion of white citizens democratically voting to keep out nonwhites too racistly triggering for more enlightened entities, such as the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, to allow?

The United Nations’ publication last month of its World Population Prospects 2019 adds important perspective to this question.

For example, in 1991, when Omar’s family fled Somalia due to their complicity in the genocidal regime of the dictator Siad Barre, the population of Somalia was only 7 million.

Today, 28 chaotic years later, Somalia has more than doubled in size to 15 million despite immense outflows of emigrants. The U.N. forecasts that Somalia’s population will reach 35 million in 2050 and 76 million in 2100.

Alternatively, millions of Somalis (or, quite possibly, tens of millions of Somalis) might prefer to follow Rep. Omar to the Magic Dirt of the first world. According to a Gallup poll, at present one-third of the population of sub-Saharan African wants to migrate, and it’s unlikely that additional population growth will make Africa more attractive. …

Do American and European white voters have the right to say no to the hundreds of millions of blacks and Muslims who will want to flee the messes they’ve made of their own countries?

Or would restricting immigration by nonwhites be “white nationalism” and “white supremacy” and therefore unthinkable?

Read the whole thing there.

 
Hide 88 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. “Trump is a white nationalist! I’m moving to (insert white country here)!”

    • Replies: @Anon
    Haiti
  2. Nope. The fundamental issue is that White People love dogs because they miss owning slaves!

    Don’t deny it wypipo!

    https://pjmedia.com/trending/liberals-tweet-goes-viral-white-people-love-dogs-because-they-miss-owning-slaves/

    Racisssss, racisss, racisss, racisss! Say it four times before breakfast and you will feel better!

    • Replies: @Lot
    Or quite often a child substitute.
    , @Element59
    Conversely, blackpipo don't like dogs or pets in general because their r-selection doesn't favor nurturing, affection, or empathy.
  3. @Ghost of Bull Moose
    "Trump is a white nationalist! I'm moving to (insert white country here)!"

    Haiti

  4. Restricting immigration is racism and white supremacy

    http://www.mexica-movement.org/Historyofracistimmigrationlaws.htm

    Countries that don’t have a Majority of Color are illegitimate on their face and unnatural

    • Troll: IHTG
    • Replies: @Oleaginous Outrager
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NoLdlmr-v2w
    , @Peripatetic Commenter
    I guess Japan must be into "yellow supremacism" as must China.
  5. ‘…According to a Gallup poll, at present one-third of the population of sub-Saharan African wants to migrate…’

    Serendipity. 40% of all Jewish Israelis want to emigrate. The Africans could all go to Israel, and the Israeli Jews could all go to Africa.

  6. Aside from the extraordinary population increase in sub-Saharan Africa beginning five decades or so ago, the growth in population in the Islamic world often gets overlooked.

    Saudi Arabia was a country of about 5.5 million at the time of the first OPEC oil crisis in the early 1970s. It is now a country of about 35 million.

    https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/saudi-arabia-population/

    Afghanistan, like Somalia, has nearly doubled its population in the 18 years of war it has experienced since we invaded.

    https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/afghanistan-population/

    Curiously, Afghanistan’s population declined during the war with the Soviets in the 1980s. I wonder what accounts for the difference in demographic trajectories.

    • Replies: @Spangel
    Saudi Arabia’s tfr is stabilizing and will likely be at replacement within 10 years. Somalia on the other hand...

    There is something about blacks. They are the only ones who have difficulty containing fertility rates across most nations they run.
    , @Lot
    Saudi Arabia is the most malthusian nation in the world.

    If they had a long standing 2.5 TFR, the entire population could live in luxury without really working the way Qataris do.

    Instead, their living standards will probably decline more than any other people in the world from 2005 to 2045.

    Right now oil and other hydrocarbon exports are about $6,000 per capita. That’s higher than it seems since more than a third of the population is under 18, so $10,000 per adult, $20,000 per married couple. Then there is nearly free gas and power.

    Double the population again, however, and then it’s only $3,000. And they cannot substantially raise exports without hurting the world price, and also encouraging OPEC+ to cheat or break up.

    I think Salmon is pretty canny. Steal back the stolen fortunes of the other princes to raise tens of billions (by locking them in Ritz Carlton suites!), bleed Iran in Yemen and give his military some experience, smash the radical Sunnis and Shiite power in Yemen before they become a problem on his border. But there isn’t much he can do in his lifetime about the low human capital and work ethic of his people.
    , @Cloudbuster
    Well, historically, being "militarily defeated" and/or occupied by the US is one of the most lucrative things that can happen to a country.
    , @Cortes
    Partial explanation of the Afghan figures:

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afghans_in_Pakistan
  7. Anonymous[848] • Disclaimer says:

    I thought there was something fishy about Hazony. Too good to be true, I thought.

    Yep.

  8. Anonymous[848] • Disclaimer says:

    Gotta do something about the shameful fact that so many atomic scientists were Jews.

    • Replies: @RadicalCenter
    Yes, “Jews” who were substantially Italian genetically, as well as to a lesser extent Germanic or Slavic. Impressive, those “Jews.”

    See Jon Entine’s write-up of a study on ashkenazi Jewish genetic testing, on the website of Genetic Literacy Project (itself heavily staffed by Jews).
    , @The Germ Theory of Disease
    NYT: "If we do not acknowledge the gender bias of the space program, it becomes difficult to move past it."

    Oh, I'd say we've moved past the space program without any difficulty.
  9. The fundamental issue is whether Europeans and European Americans have the will to continue existing, or if they will allow themselves to be invaded and subjugated by more virile cultures.

    Simple as that.

    All illegal migrants claiming asylum should be settled in Marin Country CA, Malibu CA, Bethesda MD and the upper East side. And illiterate children of illegals must go to Sidwell Friends in DC. Our problems would end quite quickly.

    • Agree: Travis, RadicalCenter
  10. “The Fundamental Issue of 2020″…according to Garp, I mean, Mr. Sailer.

    America has always experienced this backlash political milieu, a sort of quasi-civil war: in one corner are the unpretentious and besieged “authentic Americans”, and in the other corner are the hordes of the unwashed and the undesired. According to Who/Whom are contemptuous of the tastes and attitudes of the people who inhabit, or seek to inhabit, the “land of milk and honey”. When the chairman of the Republican National Committee in announced in 1992 that “We Are America” and “those other people are not”, he was providing yet another version of a century-old formula–“immigrants are the enemy of real Americans”. The problem, of course, is that today’s “authentic Americans” or “real Americans” tend not recall the trials and tribulations of their own ancestors.

    https://hti.osu.edu/opper/lesson-plans/immigration/images/looking-backward

    “America’s whites, as exemplified in the person of Donald Trump”

    I’m white, a number of my friends–liberal, libertarian, and conservative–are white, and suffice to say Trump does not exemplify us.

    In what other ways does Trump exemplify YOU, Mr. Sailer?

    “have the right to block the world’s blacks and Muslims”

    Of course American citizens have the right to reduce immigration and demand that our existing laws on the books be enforced. The problem is that Democrats and Republicans, as well as the Coalition of the Fringes, are reduced to party lines and one liners, rather than substantially addressing the issue.

    “as exemplified in the person of Somalia-born Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN)”

    She is no different than those who emigrated to our great land from other places in the world. The hopes, the dreams, the aspirations…they are the same. Remember, the Irish, the Italians, the Poles…ALL had been denigrated and downgraded by nativists as not being one of them. It made little difference that those three groups were European, they were deemed “inferior” and incapable of understanding the fundamentals of representative democracy. Somehow, someway, that mentality changed.

    Our old country was just as awesome as our current country and our new country of the future!

    • Replies: @Moses

    I’m white

     

    Aw Corvi, you're so cute.

    You're a Fellow White. Not White.

    Is it good for the Fellow Whites? Everyone knows that's all that matters.

    , @BenKenobi

    I’m white
     
    you haven't proven this, I've NOTICED that you can't CITE.

    my friends
     
    lol no

    Our old country was just as awesome as our current country and our new country of the future!
     
    that would be fake news on your part.

    checkmate, now king me.
    , @Anonymous
    That's mighty white of you
    , @petit bourgeois
    You obviously don't live in southern California. Past waves of immigrants you refer to assimilated, whereas southern California is nothing more than northern Outpost of Mexico and Central America. If I didn't speak Spanish everyday, I would starve to death.

    https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/santaanacitycalifornia/PST045218

    And with that demographic change brings a certain type of criminal element.

    https://www.santa-ana.org/pd/most-wanted

    As usual, you're full of shit.
    , @JEG
    What if the assimilation of immigrants from places that are culturally and genetically very different from anything European does not occur? Are you willing to take the risk of the US finding itself in such a diversity-driven mess 40 years from now that it cannot get out from under it?
    , @Charles Erwin Wilson 3

    She is no different than those who emigrated to our great land from other places in the world.
     
    Those who emigrated in the past and assimilated do differ from Omar. They were not enthusiastically working to destroy America. Omar is working to destroy America, because her allegiance is not to America.
  11. As I see it, we’re basically in a war, and they are on the offensive. The constitution, which was written by and for European and Christian-ish people, should not be seen as a suicide pact. If the leftist and anti-white and anti-Christian Democrats take over in 2020, it’s all over. I hope there are enough people in appropriate positions, who don’t want it to be all over.

  12. Hail says: • Website

    The fundamental issue of the 2020 presidential campaign is rapidly becoming whether or not America’s whites, as exemplified in the person of Donald Trump, have the right to block the world’s blacks and Muslims, as exemplified in the person of Somalia-born Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN), from immigrating en masse to the United States.

    For all you doubters: #SendHerBack is trending tonight.

    Whether or not America’s whites have the right to block the world’s blacks and Muslims from immigrating en masse” is not, of course, limited to some presidential campaign. Nor to the highly imperfect (and unreliable) figure of Trump.

    It’s hard to predict exactly how, or exactly when, but I am confident that our people will eventually get on their own side, and decisively so. Turn against the system that gives us this poisonous mass immigration problem; that gives us Muslims, Congolese, Central American thugs; that shoves Ilhan Omars and Oscasio-Cortezes on us and demands we bow before them.

    • Replies: @HammerJack

    I am confident that our people will eventually get on their own side, and decisively so.
     
    You may be right! Could happen. Of course, by then there will be only a few million remaining, and they will all be enslaved. But they will show solidarity!
    , @IHTG
    They might. However, I suspect "our people" might not end up being who you think they'll be.
  13. >She is no different than those who emigrated to our great land from other places in the world. <

    Xer has probably committed immigration and tax fraud. Like most of the Somali "immigrants" and their handlers.

  14. One way or another, eventually whites will fight back.

    Whether they wake up in time….or after it’s too late….we shall see.

    If they wake up sooner, it could avert a bloodbath.

    If they wake up later, there will be blood, for sure.

  15. @Corvinus
    "The Fundamental Issue of 2020"...according to Garp, I mean, Mr. Sailer.

    America has always experienced this backlash political milieu, a sort of quasi-civil war: in one corner are the unpretentious and besieged "authentic Americans", and in the other corner are the hordes of the unwashed and the undesired. According to Who/Whom are contemptuous of the tastes and attitudes of the people who inhabit, or seek to inhabit, the "land of milk and honey". When the chairman of the Republican National Committee in announced in 1992 that "We Are America" and "those other people are not", he was providing yet another version of a century-old formula--"immigrants are the enemy of real Americans". The problem, of course, is that today's "authentic Americans" or "real Americans" tend not recall the trials and tribulations of their own ancestors.

    https://hti.osu.edu/opper/lesson-plans/immigration/images/looking-backward

    "America’s whites, as exemplified in the person of Donald Trump"

    I'm white, a number of my friends--liberal, libertarian, and conservative--are white, and suffice to say Trump does not exemplify us.

    In what other ways does Trump exemplify YOU, Mr. Sailer?

    "have the right to block the world’s blacks and Muslims"

    Of course American citizens have the right to reduce immigration and demand that our existing laws on the books be enforced. The problem is that Democrats and Republicans, as well as the Coalition of the Fringes, are reduced to party lines and one liners, rather than substantially addressing the issue.

    "as exemplified in the person of Somalia-born Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN)"

    She is no different than those who emigrated to our great land from other places in the world. The hopes, the dreams, the aspirations...they are the same. Remember, the Irish, the Italians, the Poles...ALL had been denigrated and downgraded by nativists as not being one of them. It made little difference that those three groups were European, they were deemed "inferior" and incapable of understanding the fundamentals of representative democracy. Somehow, someway, that mentality changed.


    Our old country was just as awesome as our current country and our new country of the future!

    I’m white

    Aw Corvi, you’re so cute.

    You’re a Fellow White. Not White.

    Is it good for the Fellow Whites? Everyone knows that’s all that matters.

  16. @PiltdownMan
    Aside from the extraordinary population increase in sub-Saharan Africa beginning five decades or so ago, the growth in population in the Islamic world often gets overlooked.

    Saudi Arabia was a country of about 5.5 million at the time of the first OPEC oil crisis in the early 1970s. It is now a country of about 35 million.

    https://i.imgur.com/wjSHVzQ.jpg

    https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/saudi-arabia-population/

    Afghanistan, like Somalia, has nearly doubled its population in the 18 years of war it has experienced since we invaded.

    https://i.imgur.com/S8Uky1t.jpg

    https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/afghanistan-population/

    Curiously, Afghanistan's population declined during the war with the Soviets in the 1980s. I wonder what accounts for the difference in demographic trajectories.

    Saudi Arabia’s tfr is stabilizing and will likely be at replacement within 10 years. Somalia on the other hand…

    There is something about blacks. They are the only ones who have difficulty containing fertility rates across most nations they run.

    • Replies: @Ris_Eruwaedhiel
    There would either be a mass die off or mass emigration. As of now, the latter is occurring.
    , @Another German Reader
    Even if TFR stabilize, due the age-structure a country will continue to grow for around 4/5 decades.

    e.g.: Vietnam

    - population in 1980: 54million people @ TFR @ 5.8 children @ 1.1 million babies

    - population in 2000: 80 million people @ TFR @ 2,2 children @ 1.05 million babies

    - population in 2018: 96 million @ TFR @ 1.9 children @ 935k babies

    - projected population-peak (assuming zero immigration): 2045 @ 115 million @ TFR @ 1.5 children @ 800k babies

    --> many countries have a lowering TFR, but due the slow rate their aboslute growth is still accerlerating.

    --> KEEP IN MIND:

    - Vietnam has got a very serious family-planning program since the late 1970s.

    - Vietnam has got massive abortion-numbers @ 1.4 abortions per woman

    - Vietnam has made deep structural reforms since 1987 -> This enabled an average economic growth of 7% in the last 32 years. Something other developing countries don't have.

    - Vietnam benefits tremendous from the fellow Confucian societies (China, Taiwan, Korea, Japan, Honkong, Singapore) when it comes to loans, FDI, expertise, solutions and know-how/tech. Something neither the Arabs/Afghan/Pakistanis/SS-Africans have.

    - Despite being the darling of labor-intensive industries only 15% of the VN workforce is employed in manufacturing/construction vs 25% for S-Korea at the same stage of development -> industrial robots/automation

    - From the closing stage of the war until the beginning of the reforms in 1987 around 600k migrants have left Vietnam - ranging from guest-workers in E-Europe to Boat People.

    - But from the reforms on nearly 3 million have left the country. Current rate is at 130k emigrants per year.

    CONCLUSION: Arabs/Africans/Pakistanis are f*****.
  17. @Corvinus
    "The Fundamental Issue of 2020"...according to Garp, I mean, Mr. Sailer.

    America has always experienced this backlash political milieu, a sort of quasi-civil war: in one corner are the unpretentious and besieged "authentic Americans", and in the other corner are the hordes of the unwashed and the undesired. According to Who/Whom are contemptuous of the tastes and attitudes of the people who inhabit, or seek to inhabit, the "land of milk and honey". When the chairman of the Republican National Committee in announced in 1992 that "We Are America" and "those other people are not", he was providing yet another version of a century-old formula--"immigrants are the enemy of real Americans". The problem, of course, is that today's "authentic Americans" or "real Americans" tend not recall the trials and tribulations of their own ancestors.

    https://hti.osu.edu/opper/lesson-plans/immigration/images/looking-backward

    "America’s whites, as exemplified in the person of Donald Trump"

    I'm white, a number of my friends--liberal, libertarian, and conservative--are white, and suffice to say Trump does not exemplify us.

    In what other ways does Trump exemplify YOU, Mr. Sailer?

    "have the right to block the world’s blacks and Muslims"

    Of course American citizens have the right to reduce immigration and demand that our existing laws on the books be enforced. The problem is that Democrats and Republicans, as well as the Coalition of the Fringes, are reduced to party lines and one liners, rather than substantially addressing the issue.

    "as exemplified in the person of Somalia-born Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN)"

    She is no different than those who emigrated to our great land from other places in the world. The hopes, the dreams, the aspirations...they are the same. Remember, the Irish, the Italians, the Poles...ALL had been denigrated and downgraded by nativists as not being one of them. It made little difference that those three groups were European, they were deemed "inferior" and incapable of understanding the fundamentals of representative democracy. Somehow, someway, that mentality changed.


    Our old country was just as awesome as our current country and our new country of the future!

    I’m white

    you haven’t proven this, I’ve NOTICED that you can’t CITE.

    my friends

    lol no

    Our old country was just as awesome as our current country and our new country of the future!

    that would be fake news on your part.

    checkmate, now king me.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    Your Jedi Mind tricks are on the fritz. Recalibrate by eating some porgs.

    "you haven’t proven this, I’ve NOTICED that you can’t CITE."

    And you haven't proven you are human. See how that works, young Skywalker?

    "that would be fake news on your part."

    All your lies are belong to us.

    "checkmate, now king me."

    I'm playing 16D chess while being waterboarded by Frogs while you are still in the Romper Room banging about with your Bobo Doll.
  18. @Hail

    The fundamental issue of the 2020 presidential campaign is rapidly becoming whether or not America’s whites, as exemplified in the person of Donald Trump, have the right to block the world’s blacks and Muslims, as exemplified in the person of Somalia-born Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN), from immigrating en masse to the United States.
     
    For all you doubters: #SendHerBack is trending tonight.

    "Whether or not America’s whites have the right to block the world’s blacks and Muslims from immigrating en masse" is not, of course, limited to some presidential campaign. Nor to the highly imperfect (and unreliable) figure of Trump.

    It's hard to predict exactly how, or exactly when, but I am confident that our people will eventually get on their own side, and decisively so. Turn against the system that gives us this poisonous mass immigration problem; that gives us Muslims, Congolese, Central American thugs; that shoves Ilhan Omars and Oscasio-Cortezes on us and demands we bow before them.

    I am confident that our people will eventually get on their own side, and decisively so.

    You may be right! Could happen. Of course, by then there will be only a few million remaining, and they will all be enslaved. But they will show solidarity!

  19. @Peripatetic Commenter
    Nope. The fundamental issue is that White People love dogs because they miss owning slaves!

    Don't deny it wypipo!

    https://pjmedia.com/trending/liberals-tweet-goes-viral-white-people-love-dogs-because-they-miss-owning-slaves/

    Racisssss, racisss, racisss, racisss! Say it four times before breakfast and you will feel better!

    Or quite often a child substitute.

  20. Jean Raspail answered the question in 1973 in his novel, The Camp of the Saints: no, the West lacks the political will to refuse entry to the Third World. What we are witnessing now is the terrible fulfillment of his prophecy.

    • Replies: @petit bourgeois
    I thought "Camp of the Saints" was fiction, but it was going on as I read it.
  21. Lot says:
    @PiltdownMan
    Aside from the extraordinary population increase in sub-Saharan Africa beginning five decades or so ago, the growth in population in the Islamic world often gets overlooked.

    Saudi Arabia was a country of about 5.5 million at the time of the first OPEC oil crisis in the early 1970s. It is now a country of about 35 million.

    https://i.imgur.com/wjSHVzQ.jpg

    https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/saudi-arabia-population/

    Afghanistan, like Somalia, has nearly doubled its population in the 18 years of war it has experienced since we invaded.

    https://i.imgur.com/S8Uky1t.jpg

    https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/afghanistan-population/

    Curiously, Afghanistan's population declined during the war with the Soviets in the 1980s. I wonder what accounts for the difference in demographic trajectories.

    Saudi Arabia is the most malthusian nation in the world.

    If they had a long standing 2.5 TFR, the entire population could live in luxury without really working the way Qataris do.

    Instead, their living standards will probably decline more than any other people in the world from 2005 to 2045.

    Right now oil and other hydrocarbon exports are about $6,000 per capita. That’s higher than it seems since more than a third of the population is under 18, so $10,000 per adult, $20,000 per married couple. Then there is nearly free gas and power.

    Double the population again, however, and then it’s only $3,000. And they cannot substantially raise exports without hurting the world price, and also encouraging OPEC+ to cheat or break up.

    I think Salmon is pretty canny. Steal back the stolen fortunes of the other princes to raise tens of billions (by locking them in Ritz Carlton suites!), bleed Iran in Yemen and give his military some experience, smash the radical Sunnis and Shiite power in Yemen before they become a problem on his border. But there isn’t much he can do in his lifetime about the low human capital and work ethic of his people.

    • Agree: 68W58
  22. @Anonymous
    Gotta do something about the shameful fact that so many atomic scientists were Jews.

    https://twitter.com/ramzpaul/status/1151550987603234816

    Yes, “Jews” who were substantially Italian genetically, as well as to a lesser extent Germanic or Slavic. Impressive, those “Jews.”

    See Jon Entine’s write-up of a study on ashkenazi Jewish genetic testing, on the website of Genetic Literacy Project (itself heavily staffed by Jews).

  23. Anonymous[848] • Disclaimer says:

    Tranny men taking over women’s sports is replay of blacks taking over white sports.

    White men created white sports for white people. For whites to play, blacks had to be excluded as they are a stronger and tougher race. But anti-racists said race is just a social construct and that blacks are merely whites with dark skin. So, blacks were allowed to play in white sports… and totally took over because race is real.
    Thus, blacks took over all the ‘hero’ roles of the West. This had a huge psycho-sociological impact because the faceless masses look to the few heroes as their idols and icons. White people used to look white heroes as their ‘gods’. Once blacks took over sports, whites began to look up to black heroes as their ‘gods’. When a race loses their heroes, they lose their pride. Whites lost pride not mainly due to PC but because of black takeover of sports. Blacks got cocky, whites got cucky.

    Women’s sports were created for women. Women needed a world of their own because they cannot compete with men. But gender theorists said ‘gender is fluid’, and it’s natural and easy for men to become ‘women’. And only a ‘transphobic bigot’ would oppose such ‘inclusive’ progress. Women who wanted to keep women’s sports for women were vilified as whites who’d wanted to keep whites sports to whites. We know that when blacks were allowed to play, they totally took over games like boxing, football, and basketball. And now that tranny men are allowed into women’s sports, they are taking over.

    They say ‘progress’ is about equality, but the long-term impact of these ‘progressive’ policies is racial or sexual hierarchies that favor ONE group over all others.
    If anything, racially and sexually exclusive policies of the past allowed for more groups to participate in game. If we had white sports and black sports, there could be white heroes for whites and black heroes for blacks. But as sports are integrated, there are only black heroes because blacks are naturally advantaged over whites. And if we could maintain women’s sports and men’s sports, women can have their heroines in their own athletic domain. But with sexual integration via the tranny business, we have wigged men beating women in many sports. If this becomes a trend, all of women’s sports could be dominated, and women will have to have men as their ‘female’ heroes.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar

    Women’s sports were created for women. Women needed a world of their own because they cannot compete with men.
     
    So you're saying whites need a world of their own because they can't compete with blacks?

    For whites to play, blacks had to be excluded as they are a stronger and tougher race.
     
    Guess so. But tougher? Get real. Those whiny bastards are anything but tough.

    But as sports are integrated, there are only black heroes because blacks are naturally advantaged over whites.
     
    That depends on the sport. And the rules.
  24. Anonymous[111] • Disclaimer says:

    “White nationalism” just means majority White. Are brown and black people opposed to majority White nations?

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Interesting conundrum:

    On the one hand, they wish to import their blood relatives into 'white' nations to the maximum extent possible.
    On the other hand, they consciously flee the non-white majority and character of their home nations.

    Obviously, there is an internal contradiction between propositions 1 and 2 - that, is the target 'white' nation will eventualy morph into the non-white nations they fled from.

    My gut feeling is that the instinct to flee from their own is so strong that it will swamp the intellectualization needed to appreciate Proposition 2.
  25. @Anonymous
    Gotta do something about the shameful fact that so many atomic scientists were Jews.

    https://twitter.com/ramzpaul/status/1151550987603234816

    NYT: “If we do not acknowledge the gender bias of the space program, it becomes difficult to move past it.”

    Oh, I’d say we’ve moved past the space program without any difficulty.

    • Agree: Counterinsurgency
    • LOL: HammerJack
  26. @Anonymous
    https://twitter.com/KMGVictoria/status/1151398308469886977

    Tranny men taking over women's sports is replay of blacks taking over white sports.

    White men created white sports for white people. For whites to play, blacks had to be excluded as they are a stronger and tougher race. But anti-racists said race is just a social construct and that blacks are merely whites with dark skin. So, blacks were allowed to play in white sports... and totally took over because race is real.
    Thus, blacks took over all the 'hero' roles of the West. This had a huge psycho-sociological impact because the faceless masses look to the few heroes as their idols and icons. White people used to look white heroes as their 'gods'. Once blacks took over sports, whites began to look up to black heroes as their 'gods'. When a race loses their heroes, they lose their pride. Whites lost pride not mainly due to PC but because of black takeover of sports. Blacks got cocky, whites got cucky.

    Women's sports were created for women. Women needed a world of their own because they cannot compete with men. But gender theorists said 'gender is fluid', and it's natural and easy for men to become 'women'. And only a 'transphobic bigot' would oppose such 'inclusive' progress. Women who wanted to keep women's sports for women were vilified as whites who'd wanted to keep whites sports to whites. We know that when blacks were allowed to play, they totally took over games like boxing, football, and basketball. And now that tranny men are allowed into women's sports, they are taking over.

    They say 'progress' is about equality, but the long-term impact of these 'progressive' policies is racial or sexual hierarchies that favor ONE group over all others.
    If anything, racially and sexually exclusive policies of the past allowed for more groups to participate in game. If we had white sports and black sports, there could be white heroes for whites and black heroes for blacks. But as sports are integrated, there are only black heroes because blacks are naturally advantaged over whites. And if we could maintain women's sports and men's sports, women can have their heroines in their own athletic domain. But with sexual integration via the tranny business, we have wigged men beating women in many sports. If this becomes a trend, all of women's sports could be dominated, and women will have to have men as their 'female' heroes.

    Women’s sports were created for women. Women needed a world of their own because they cannot compete with men.

    So you’re saying whites need a world of their own because they can’t compete with blacks?

    For whites to play, blacks had to be excluded as they are a stronger and tougher race.

    Guess so. But tougher? Get real. Those whiny bastards are anything but tough.

    But as sports are integrated, there are only black heroes because blacks are naturally advantaged over whites.

    That depends on the sport. And the rules.

    • Replies: @Redneck farmer
    He has some pretty good whine with that blackpill, doesn't he?
    , @Anonymous

    So you’re saying whites need a world of their own because they can’t compete with blacks?
     
    Yes. The only reason why blacks dropped the Negro League was because they knew they could beat whites and take over white sports, in effect turning them into Negro-Dominant-League.

    But suppose whites dominated sports cuz whites are tougher and stronger than blacks.

    Then, blacks would have demanded a Negro League so they could have their own sports too. It's like blacks have their own clubs and tournaments in chess.
    When blacks are inferior in some area, they always insist on creating their own space and their own thing. It is only when blacks are superior in some area that they oppose race-based policies since they figure biology will allow them to take over.

    A people without their own heroes cannot survive. At least, Jews have pride of ownership. Not many Jews in sports, but they control so many teams and media. But what do whites get from blacks taking over white sports? They lose their own heroes, and that means they lose their women too to the Other. Total shame.
    , @Cowboy Shaw
    In rugby it's very noticeable that the three significant races in the sport, black, whites, Polynesians, all seem to have different strengths, and none appears to have decisive advantages over the other. The aerobic requirements of the sport seem to balance out the advantages blacks have in power and polynesians have in athleticsm and muscularity.

    There's one other group and that's Melanesians (Fijians only only - Vanuatuans and Solomon Islanders have had almost no impact on the sport). There aren't many of them, but Fijians seem to be off the charts ahead of blacks even in explosive speed and strength and agility. I don't think any group comes close.

    I believe the theory is that as the early Polynesians grazed Melanesia about 2,000 years ago they got some Melanesian genes and that turned them from docile Micronesians into super charged Polynesians.

    The bloke who is widely considered the greatest rugby player of all, Richie McCaw, is just a white bloke from the South Island with Scottish genetics. His strengths were aerobic capacity, superhuman toughness and intelligence.
  27. Anonymous[354] • Disclaimer says:
    @Corvinus
    "The Fundamental Issue of 2020"...according to Garp, I mean, Mr. Sailer.

    America has always experienced this backlash political milieu, a sort of quasi-civil war: in one corner are the unpretentious and besieged "authentic Americans", and in the other corner are the hordes of the unwashed and the undesired. According to Who/Whom are contemptuous of the tastes and attitudes of the people who inhabit, or seek to inhabit, the "land of milk and honey". When the chairman of the Republican National Committee in announced in 1992 that "We Are America" and "those other people are not", he was providing yet another version of a century-old formula--"immigrants are the enemy of real Americans". The problem, of course, is that today's "authentic Americans" or "real Americans" tend not recall the trials and tribulations of their own ancestors.

    https://hti.osu.edu/opper/lesson-plans/immigration/images/looking-backward

    "America’s whites, as exemplified in the person of Donald Trump"

    I'm white, a number of my friends--liberal, libertarian, and conservative--are white, and suffice to say Trump does not exemplify us.

    In what other ways does Trump exemplify YOU, Mr. Sailer?

    "have the right to block the world’s blacks and Muslims"

    Of course American citizens have the right to reduce immigration and demand that our existing laws on the books be enforced. The problem is that Democrats and Republicans, as well as the Coalition of the Fringes, are reduced to party lines and one liners, rather than substantially addressing the issue.

    "as exemplified in the person of Somalia-born Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN)"

    She is no different than those who emigrated to our great land from other places in the world. The hopes, the dreams, the aspirations...they are the same. Remember, the Irish, the Italians, the Poles...ALL had been denigrated and downgraded by nativists as not being one of them. It made little difference that those three groups were European, they were deemed "inferior" and incapable of understanding the fundamentals of representative democracy. Somehow, someway, that mentality changed.


    Our old country was just as awesome as our current country and our new country of the future!

    That’s mighty white of you

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "That's mighty white of you".

    Indeed, It's OK to be the type of white person a white person wants to be!
  28. @Corvinus
    "The Fundamental Issue of 2020"...according to Garp, I mean, Mr. Sailer.

    America has always experienced this backlash political milieu, a sort of quasi-civil war: in one corner are the unpretentious and besieged "authentic Americans", and in the other corner are the hordes of the unwashed and the undesired. According to Who/Whom are contemptuous of the tastes and attitudes of the people who inhabit, or seek to inhabit, the "land of milk and honey". When the chairman of the Republican National Committee in announced in 1992 that "We Are America" and "those other people are not", he was providing yet another version of a century-old formula--"immigrants are the enemy of real Americans". The problem, of course, is that today's "authentic Americans" or "real Americans" tend not recall the trials and tribulations of their own ancestors.

    https://hti.osu.edu/opper/lesson-plans/immigration/images/looking-backward

    "America’s whites, as exemplified in the person of Donald Trump"

    I'm white, a number of my friends--liberal, libertarian, and conservative--are white, and suffice to say Trump does not exemplify us.

    In what other ways does Trump exemplify YOU, Mr. Sailer?

    "have the right to block the world’s blacks and Muslims"

    Of course American citizens have the right to reduce immigration and demand that our existing laws on the books be enforced. The problem is that Democrats and Republicans, as well as the Coalition of the Fringes, are reduced to party lines and one liners, rather than substantially addressing the issue.

    "as exemplified in the person of Somalia-born Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN)"

    She is no different than those who emigrated to our great land from other places in the world. The hopes, the dreams, the aspirations...they are the same. Remember, the Irish, the Italians, the Poles...ALL had been denigrated and downgraded by nativists as not being one of them. It made little difference that those three groups were European, they were deemed "inferior" and incapable of understanding the fundamentals of representative democracy. Somehow, someway, that mentality changed.


    Our old country was just as awesome as our current country and our new country of the future!

    You obviously don’t live in southern California. Past waves of immigrants you refer to assimilated, whereas southern California is nothing more than northern Outpost of Mexico and Central America. If I didn’t speak Spanish everyday, I would starve to death.

    https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/santaanacitycalifornia/PST045218

    And with that demographic change brings a certain type of criminal element.

    https://www.santa-ana.org/pd/most-wanted

    As usual, you’re full of shit.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "You obviously don’t live in southern California. Past waves of immigrants you refer to assimilated..."

    European and non-European alike. You do realize that the nativists arguments then are the same as they are now, right?

    "whereas southern California is nothing more than northern Outpost of Mexico and Central America. If I didn’t speak Spanish everyday, I would starve to death."

    LOL, that is EXACTLY how nativists felt when the teeming masses Italians and Poles inundated urban areas of the late 1800's/early 1900's. Even when the Germans arrived in the 1840's, nativists bitterly complained about their "gutter language".
  29. @Reg Cæsar

    Women’s sports were created for women. Women needed a world of their own because they cannot compete with men.
     
    So you're saying whites need a world of their own because they can't compete with blacks?

    For whites to play, blacks had to be excluded as they are a stronger and tougher race.
     
    Guess so. But tougher? Get real. Those whiny bastards are anything but tough.

    But as sports are integrated, there are only black heroes because blacks are naturally advantaged over whites.
     
    That depends on the sport. And the rules.

    He has some pretty good whine with that blackpill, doesn’t he?

  30. Sorry iSteve but both Omar and Trump are Jewish puppets and that plain fact means the question posed is moot.

    Actually the question is worse than moot. The question does not exist at all. Except in fever swamps on the internet.

    When you think about how THE QUESTION literally cannot even be uttered in any top level decision-making setting in any industry, niche or sector of society — at that point of recognition we understand that the anti-white forces are still in complete control and that the expunging of white political entities has already been agreed upon by the Powers That Be.

    The PTB assume with 100% confidence that the white world is finished. There’s no argument. It’s a done deal.

    (Part of the reason they hate Trump so much is Trump hasn’t *fully* processed and accepted his white dispossession. Trump infuriates them because he gets on board with nail-in-the-coffin anti-white mass immigration policies but then he won’t bow and scrape like a mewling slave on a personal level like Jeb Bush. This has the anti-white forces continually on edge!)

  31. Anonymous[399] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous
    "White nationalism" just means majority White. Are brown and black people opposed to majority White nations?

    Interesting conundrum:

    On the one hand, they wish to import their blood relatives into ‘white’ nations to the maximum extent possible.
    On the other hand, they consciously flee the non-white majority and character of their home nations.

    Obviously, there is an internal contradiction between propositions 1 and 2 – that, is the target ‘white’ nation will eventualy morph into the non-white nations they fled from.

    My gut feeling is that the instinct to flee from their own is so strong that it will swamp the intellectualization needed to appreciate Proposition 2.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Whites are the 'sacrificial anode'* of global demographics.

    *A term from marine engineering. Substantial steel structures prone to corrosion from salt water are 'protected' by forming a galvanic current with a chunk of a more reactive metal, which corrodes away in lieu of the precious steel.
  32. @Tiny Duck
    Restricting immigration is racism and white supremacy

    http://www.mexica-movement.org/Historyofracistimmigrationlaws.htm

    Countries that don't have a Majority of Color are illegitimate on their face and unnatural

  33. Anonymous[848] • Disclaimer says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    Women’s sports were created for women. Women needed a world of their own because they cannot compete with men.
     
    So you're saying whites need a world of their own because they can't compete with blacks?

    For whites to play, blacks had to be excluded as they are a stronger and tougher race.
     
    Guess so. But tougher? Get real. Those whiny bastards are anything but tough.

    But as sports are integrated, there are only black heroes because blacks are naturally advantaged over whites.
     
    That depends on the sport. And the rules.

    So you’re saying whites need a world of their own because they can’t compete with blacks?

    Yes. The only reason why blacks dropped the Negro League was because they knew they could beat whites and take over white sports, in effect turning them into Negro-Dominant-League.

    But suppose whites dominated sports cuz whites are tougher and stronger than blacks.

    Then, blacks would have demanded a Negro League so they could have their own sports too. It’s like blacks have their own clubs and tournaments in chess.
    When blacks are inferior in some area, they always insist on creating their own space and their own thing. It is only when blacks are superior in some area that they oppose race-based policies since they figure biology will allow them to take over.

    A people without their own heroes cannot survive. At least, Jews have pride of ownership. Not many Jews in sports, but they control so many teams and media. But what do whites get from blacks taking over white sports? They lose their own heroes, and that means they lose their women too to the Other. Total shame.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar

    . The only reason why blacks dropped the Negro League was because they knew they could beat whites and take over white sports, in effect turning them into Negro-Dominant-League.
     
    The Negro Leagues were in baseball, which blacks have never "dominated". If anything, they're Latin-dominated.

    Blacks are disappearing from baseball.
  34. @Hail

    The fundamental issue of the 2020 presidential campaign is rapidly becoming whether or not America’s whites, as exemplified in the person of Donald Trump, have the right to block the world’s blacks and Muslims, as exemplified in the person of Somalia-born Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN), from immigrating en masse to the United States.
     
    For all you doubters: #SendHerBack is trending tonight.

    "Whether or not America’s whites have the right to block the world’s blacks and Muslims from immigrating en masse" is not, of course, limited to some presidential campaign. Nor to the highly imperfect (and unreliable) figure of Trump.

    It's hard to predict exactly how, or exactly when, but I am confident that our people will eventually get on their own side, and decisively so. Turn against the system that gives us this poisonous mass immigration problem; that gives us Muslims, Congolese, Central American thugs; that shoves Ilhan Omars and Oscasio-Cortezes on us and demands we bow before them.

    They might. However, I suspect “our people” might not end up being who you think they’ll be.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    So from your perspective, who is this "our people"?
  35. @Diversity Heretic
    Jean Raspail answered the question in 1973 in his novel, The Camp of the Saints: no, the West lacks the political will to refuse entry to the Third World. What we are witnessing now is the terrible fulfillment of his prophecy.

    I thought “Camp of the Saints” was fiction, but it was going on as I read it.

  36. Remember the Neanderthals? Do you suppose that instead of saying, “There goes the neighbourhood,” they instead said, “Diversity is our strength” ? Our betters tell us the Romans didn’t even think in terms of race; stipulating that that is the truth, look where it got them.

  37. I don’t know why the focus is always on blacks & Africa. And nobody seems to notice:

    a) truly populous & potentially powerful populations are in Asia (India, China)

    b) Arabs, who are “dark” Caucasians, are a natural barrier for sub-Saharan Africans whom they despise

    c) all population problems are reflection of all-too-easy way of life & humanitarian delusions NW Europeans are susceptible to. As are they slaves to democracy & capitalism.

    Most of the world (Asia, Russia, Eastern Europe, North Africa, Latin America)- don’t give a hoot about black Africa’s present & future & won’t them allow to move from their shitholes.

  38. b) Arabs, who are “dark” Caucasians, are a natural barrier for sub-Saharan Africans whom they despise

    Not quite.

    Libyans make good money smuggling sub-Saharan migrants across the Mediterranean and into Italy.

    The traffic has eased somewhat, lately, as the Italian government took the pragmatic step of paying-off the Libyan people smuggling warlords to stem the flow, but it will likely resume. The economic incentives to resume are massive.

    https://www.thelocal.it/20170913/exclusive-libyan-smuggler-says-human-trafficking-will-continue-despite-italian-deal

  39. The fundamental issue of the 2020 presidential campaign is rapidly becoming whether or not America’s whites, as exemplified in the person of Donald Trump, have the right to block the world’s blacks and Muslims, as exemplified in the person of Somalia-born Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN), from immigrating en masse to the United States.

    The same question could (and should) be asked of Europe and Europeans.

    Ursula von der Leyen, CDU Politikerin, formerly (just resigned) German defense minister (generally considered a huge failure in that position), was recently elected new EU commission president, replacing drunkard Jean-Claude Juncker — as part of her campaign for that job, she said she was born and felt European before she later learned (“gelernt habe”) she was German (if you can and want to believe that) — so her goal is to unite and strengthen the EU (#Europa):

    • Replies: @eah
    At the same time and as part of the same campaign, she said Europe needs a new migration pact, one with 'humane corridors' ("humanitären Korridoren"):

    https://twitter.com/Netzdenunziant/status/1151094402250526721
    , @Peripatetic Commenter
    Perhaps she should have said something like:

    Ich bin ein europäisches Schwein
    , @Romanian
    Still, seven children. That's something worth emulating.

    That she was not only considered a weak minister, but also a corrupt one, is icing on the s*** cake, given how much the EU emotes with regards to good governance, anti-corruption etc.
  40. @eah
    The fundamental issue of the 2020 presidential campaign is rapidly becoming whether or not America’s whites, as exemplified in the person of Donald Trump, have the right to block the world’s blacks and Muslims, as exemplified in the person of Somalia-born Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN), from immigrating en masse to the United States.

    The same question could (and should) be asked of Europe and Europeans.

    Ursula von der Leyen, CDU Politikerin, formerly (just resigned) German defense minister (generally considered a huge failure in that position), was recently elected new EU commission president, replacing drunkard Jean-Claude Juncker -- as part of her campaign for that job, she said she was born and felt European before she later learned ("gelernt habe") she was German (if you can and want to believe that) -- so her goal is to unite and strengthen the EU (#Europa):

    https://twitter.com/vonderleyen/status/1151084398370074624

    At the same time and as part of the same campaign, she said Europe needs a new migration pact, one with ‘humane corridors’ (“humanitären Korridoren”):

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Full No Deal WTO Brexit.
  41. Anonymous[693] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous
    Interesting conundrum:

    On the one hand, they wish to import their blood relatives into 'white' nations to the maximum extent possible.
    On the other hand, they consciously flee the non-white majority and character of their home nations.

    Obviously, there is an internal contradiction between propositions 1 and 2 - that, is the target 'white' nation will eventualy morph into the non-white nations they fled from.

    My gut feeling is that the instinct to flee from their own is so strong that it will swamp the intellectualization needed to appreciate Proposition 2.

    Whites are the ‘sacrificial anode’* of global demographics.

    *A term from marine engineering. Substantial steel structures prone to corrosion from salt water are ‘protected’ by forming a galvanic current with a chunk of a more reactive metal, which corrodes away in lieu of the precious steel.

  42. Anonymous[693] • Disclaimer says:
    @eah
    At the same time and as part of the same campaign, she said Europe needs a new migration pact, one with 'humane corridors' ("humanitären Korridoren"):

    https://twitter.com/Netzdenunziant/status/1151094402250526721

    Full No Deal WTO Brexit.

  43. @Reg Cæsar

    Women’s sports were created for women. Women needed a world of their own because they cannot compete with men.
     
    So you're saying whites need a world of their own because they can't compete with blacks?

    For whites to play, blacks had to be excluded as they are a stronger and tougher race.
     
    Guess so. But tougher? Get real. Those whiny bastards are anything but tough.

    But as sports are integrated, there are only black heroes because blacks are naturally advantaged over whites.
     
    That depends on the sport. And the rules.

    In rugby it’s very noticeable that the three significant races in the sport, black, whites, Polynesians, all seem to have different strengths, and none appears to have decisive advantages over the other. The aerobic requirements of the sport seem to balance out the advantages blacks have in power and polynesians have in athleticsm and muscularity.

    There’s one other group and that’s Melanesians (Fijians only only – Vanuatuans and Solomon Islanders have had almost no impact on the sport). There aren’t many of them, but Fijians seem to be off the charts ahead of blacks even in explosive speed and strength and agility. I don’t think any group comes close.

    I believe the theory is that as the early Polynesians grazed Melanesia about 2,000 years ago they got some Melanesian genes and that turned them from docile Micronesians into super charged Polynesians.

    The bloke who is widely considered the greatest rugby player of all, Richie McCaw, is just a white bloke from the South Island with Scottish genetics. His strengths were aerobic capacity, superhuman toughness and intelligence.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    Hating the English helps in rugby, too: Maoris, Scots, Welsh, French, Boers, Argentines...
    , @The Last Real Calvinist
    Great observations.

    Rugby is a really good game, as you say, in the variety of athletic gifts it rewards. And the Fijians are something else. But the most impressive player I've ever seen is still the legendary Jonah Lomu, a New Zealander from a Maori background, who was enormous (6' 5", 275), but moved like he was on jetpacks. He was incredible to watch.

  44. Increasingly the minority “leaders” are telling whites to go back to Europe. However, most European countries will not allow whites to immigrate there. Especially white South Africans, but really no whites are welcome. Third worlders, on the other hand… Right Angela?

    Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians, Europe for Africans and Asians. Once Europe is swamped, where will they go next, as America will be full of Latinos? Antarctica has lots of room.

    • Replies: @Corn
    “Increasingly the minority “leaders” are telling whites to go back to Europe.”

    Indeed. The same people who smugly tell white Americans to go back to Europe also go apes___ over the idea of a white Europe.
    , @Ris_Eruwaedhiel
    If Whites go back to Europe, who will keep the electricity running and pay the welfare bills?

    If and when non-Whites gain control of America, the different factions that make up the Democratic Party would turn on each other and tear each other apart. Only two things unites the Democratic party: they are "warring tribes in the common pursuit of plunder" and hatred of Whites, which to non-Whites, includes Jews.

    Blacks probably figure they would be in control. Wishful thinking because Asians and Hispanics regard them as inferior, the hewers of wood and drawers of water. Ironically enough, only Whites respect them. Maybe they would try to follow Whites to Europe.
  45. @Tiny Duck
    Restricting immigration is racism and white supremacy

    http://www.mexica-movement.org/Historyofracistimmigrationlaws.htm

    Countries that don't have a Majority of Color are illegitimate on their face and unnatural

    I guess Japan must be into “yellow supremacism” as must China.

  46. @IHTG
    They might. However, I suspect "our people" might not end up being who you think they'll be.

    So from your perspective, who is this “our people”?

  47. @Anonymous
    That's mighty white of you

    “That’s mighty white of you”.

    Indeed, It’s OK to be the type of white person a white person wants to be!

  48. @petit bourgeois
    You obviously don't live in southern California. Past waves of immigrants you refer to assimilated, whereas southern California is nothing more than northern Outpost of Mexico and Central America. If I didn't speak Spanish everyday, I would starve to death.

    https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/santaanacitycalifornia/PST045218

    And with that demographic change brings a certain type of criminal element.

    https://www.santa-ana.org/pd/most-wanted

    As usual, you're full of shit.

    “You obviously don’t live in southern California. Past waves of immigrants you refer to assimilated…”

    European and non-European alike. You do realize that the nativists arguments then are the same as they are now, right?

    “whereas southern California is nothing more than northern Outpost of Mexico and Central America. If I didn’t speak Spanish everyday, I would starve to death.”

    LOL, that is EXACTLY how nativists felt when the teeming masses Italians and Poles inundated urban areas of the late 1800’s/early 1900’s. Even when the Germans arrived in the 1840’s, nativists bitterly complained about their “gutter language”.

  49. @eah
    The fundamental issue of the 2020 presidential campaign is rapidly becoming whether or not America’s whites, as exemplified in the person of Donald Trump, have the right to block the world’s blacks and Muslims, as exemplified in the person of Somalia-born Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN), from immigrating en masse to the United States.

    The same question could (and should) be asked of Europe and Europeans.

    Ursula von der Leyen, CDU Politikerin, formerly (just resigned) German defense minister (generally considered a huge failure in that position), was recently elected new EU commission president, replacing drunkard Jean-Claude Juncker -- as part of her campaign for that job, she said she was born and felt European before she later learned ("gelernt habe") she was German (if you can and want to believe that) -- so her goal is to unite and strengthen the EU (#Europa):

    https://twitter.com/vonderleyen/status/1151084398370074624

    Perhaps she should have said something like:

    Ich bin ein europäisches Schwein

  50. The fundamental issue facing the United States is the demographic collapse of whites due to the low fertility of whites. 2018 was a record low for recorded white births by the CDC.

    CDC data `–—- 1988 — 2018
    White births* – 3.1 M – 1.9 M
    Non-White -—- 0.8 M – 1.9 M

    *white birth data is based on the race of the mother, in 2018 about 10% of white births will have non-white fathers, thus not be considered white.

    the 1990 census counted 122 million whites under the age of 40. In 2015 just 103 million whites under the age of 40 , a drop of 15% in 25 years. Any observed species which had such a significant decline would be considered threatened and in need of protection from the invaders to avoid extinction.

    • Agree: Prodigal son
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "The fundamental issue facing the United States is the demographic collapse of whites due to the low fertility of whites."

    You assume that all, or most, whites ought to be deathly concerned about low fertility. Perhaps normies are fine with how they are living their lives, thank you very much.

    Furthermore, YOU are characterizing as this "collapse".

    "the 1990 census counted 122 million whites under the age of 40. In 2015 just 103 million whites under the age of 40, a drop of 15% in 25 years."

    Or 19 million. It really depends upon how one looks at the numbers. Furthermore, could not there be other factors that accounts for this drop?

    "Any observed species which had such a significant decline would be considered threatened and in need of protection from the invaders to avoid extinction."

    A decline, sure. The white race being "threatened" and "in need of protection"? Well, you are entitled to your own opinion.

    Praytell, how many white kids in your brood? If you do not have at least five in your homestead under the age of 10, you are not doing your part.
  51. @BenKenobi

    I’m white
     
    you haven't proven this, I've NOTICED that you can't CITE.

    my friends
     
    lol no

    Our old country was just as awesome as our current country and our new country of the future!
     
    that would be fake news on your part.

    checkmate, now king me.

    Your Jedi Mind tricks are on the fritz. Recalibrate by eating some porgs.

    “you haven’t proven this, I’ve NOTICED that you can’t CITE.”

    And you haven’t proven you are human. See how that works, young Skywalker?

    “that would be fake news on your part.”

    All your lies are belong to us.

    “checkmate, now king me.”

    I’m playing 16D chess while being waterboarded by Frogs while you are still in the Romper Room banging about with your Bobo Doll.

  52. Somali-itis is an Anglo disease. The US, UK, Australia have allowed at least one million of these useless eaters via refugee programs. NZ too probably. My philosophy is, you destroy and trash your country don’t come to America. You deal with it at home.
    And with its loony birthrates, how trashed is Somalia? I know American Somali “refugees” are always shuttling back to Somalia for visits.

  53. @Anonymous

    So you’re saying whites need a world of their own because they can’t compete with blacks?
     
    Yes. The only reason why blacks dropped the Negro League was because they knew they could beat whites and take over white sports, in effect turning them into Negro-Dominant-League.

    But suppose whites dominated sports cuz whites are tougher and stronger than blacks.

    Then, blacks would have demanded a Negro League so they could have their own sports too. It's like blacks have their own clubs and tournaments in chess.
    When blacks are inferior in some area, they always insist on creating their own space and their own thing. It is only when blacks are superior in some area that they oppose race-based policies since they figure biology will allow them to take over.

    A people without their own heroes cannot survive. At least, Jews have pride of ownership. Not many Jews in sports, but they control so many teams and media. But what do whites get from blacks taking over white sports? They lose their own heroes, and that means they lose their women too to the Other. Total shame.

    . The only reason why blacks dropped the Negro League was because they knew they could beat whites and take over white sports, in effect turning them into Negro-Dominant-League.

    The Negro Leagues were in baseball, which blacks have never “dominated”. If anything, they’re Latin-dominated.

    Blacks are disappearing from baseball.

    • Agree: Prodigal son
    • Replies: @Anonymous

    The Negro Leagues were in baseball, which blacks have never “dominated”. If anything, they’re Latin-dominated.
    Blacks are disappearing from baseball.
     
    Blacks were once big in baseball as super sluggers. But American blacks figured basketball and football are more glamorous and sexy, and indeed, basketball and football players are more celebrated as athletes than anyone in baseball.

    As for 'latinos' in baseball, most of them are black or mulatto from places like the Dominican Republic.
  54. Whites have been completely unable to say no to Blacks in the last 150 yesrs.

    No reason to think we will start now.

  55. @Corvinus
    "The Fundamental Issue of 2020"...according to Garp, I mean, Mr. Sailer.

    America has always experienced this backlash political milieu, a sort of quasi-civil war: in one corner are the unpretentious and besieged "authentic Americans", and in the other corner are the hordes of the unwashed and the undesired. According to Who/Whom are contemptuous of the tastes and attitudes of the people who inhabit, or seek to inhabit, the "land of milk and honey". When the chairman of the Republican National Committee in announced in 1992 that "We Are America" and "those other people are not", he was providing yet another version of a century-old formula--"immigrants are the enemy of real Americans". The problem, of course, is that today's "authentic Americans" or "real Americans" tend not recall the trials and tribulations of their own ancestors.

    https://hti.osu.edu/opper/lesson-plans/immigration/images/looking-backward

    "America’s whites, as exemplified in the person of Donald Trump"

    I'm white, a number of my friends--liberal, libertarian, and conservative--are white, and suffice to say Trump does not exemplify us.

    In what other ways does Trump exemplify YOU, Mr. Sailer?

    "have the right to block the world’s blacks and Muslims"

    Of course American citizens have the right to reduce immigration and demand that our existing laws on the books be enforced. The problem is that Democrats and Republicans, as well as the Coalition of the Fringes, are reduced to party lines and one liners, rather than substantially addressing the issue.

    "as exemplified in the person of Somalia-born Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN)"

    She is no different than those who emigrated to our great land from other places in the world. The hopes, the dreams, the aspirations...they are the same. Remember, the Irish, the Italians, the Poles...ALL had been denigrated and downgraded by nativists as not being one of them. It made little difference that those three groups were European, they were deemed "inferior" and incapable of understanding the fundamentals of representative democracy. Somehow, someway, that mentality changed.


    Our old country was just as awesome as our current country and our new country of the future!

    What if the assimilation of immigrants from places that are culturally and genetically very different from anything European does not occur? Are you willing to take the risk of the US finding itself in such a diversity-driven mess 40 years from now that it cannot get out from under it?

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "What if the assimilation of immigrants from places that are culturally and genetically very different from anything European does not occur?"

    You are assuming that it has not ever happened. Consider that the Chinese, Japanese, and Assyrians have immersed themselves quite well in our society.

    Moreover, the same argument was made by nativists (WASPs) toward their fellow Eastern/Southern European brethren. The influx of new immigrants led to apocalyptic predictions about the impending doom awaiting America — Italians, Jews, and Poles would impose their inferior biology, peculiar religious practices, and substandard ways of living onto this nation, founded by WASPs, thus lowering an elevated civilization. Simply put, these ethnicities were members of a lower biological order and were culturally inferior--dirty, less intelligent, criminal-prone.

    "Are you willing to take the risk of the US finding itself in such a diversity-driven mess 40 years from now that it cannot get out from under it?"

    You are assuming that is, or will be, a "diversity-driven mess". You do realize that the WASPs felt the same way about peoples who were "different" than them, right?
  56. @JEG
    What if the assimilation of immigrants from places that are culturally and genetically very different from anything European does not occur? Are you willing to take the risk of the US finding itself in such a diversity-driven mess 40 years from now that it cannot get out from under it?

    “What if the assimilation of immigrants from places that are culturally and genetically very different from anything European does not occur?”

    You are assuming that it has not ever happened. Consider that the Chinese, Japanese, and Assyrians have immersed themselves quite well in our society.

    Moreover, the same argument was made by nativists (WASPs) toward their fellow Eastern/Southern European brethren. The influx of new immigrants led to apocalyptic predictions about the impending doom awaiting America — Italians, Jews, and Poles would impose their inferior biology, peculiar religious practices, and substandard ways of living onto this nation, founded by WASPs, thus lowering an elevated civilization. Simply put, these ethnicities were members of a lower biological order and were culturally inferior–dirty, less intelligent, criminal-prone.

    “Are you willing to take the risk of the US finding itself in such a diversity-driven mess 40 years from now that it cannot get out from under it?”

    You are assuming that is, or will be, a “diversity-driven mess”. You do realize that the WASPs felt the same way about peoples who were “different” than them, right?

    • Replies: @Cloudbuster
    The influx of new immigrants led to apocalyptic predictions about the impending doom awaiting America — Italians, Jews, and Poles would impose their inferior biology, peculiar religious practices, and substandard ways of living onto this nation, founded by WASPs, thus lowering an elevated civilization.

    As far as I can tell, the predictions were correct. The timescale was just longer than they imagined. The ranks of White liberals on the anti-White left are drawn heavily from the of descendants of 19th and early 20th century immigrants, and it was those immigrants and their children who provided the Democratic Party the power to implement its agenda through government, education and media throughout the 20th century and on into the present.
    , @Neuday
    Just because several thousand civilized Japanese or Germans assimilated back when America was strong and had no welfare state doesnt mean millions of uncivilized Somalis and Aztecs can assimilate now.

    The dosage is the poison.
  57. @Travis
    The fundamental issue facing the United States is the demographic collapse of whites due to the low fertility of whites. 2018 was a record low for recorded white births by the CDC.

    CDC data `--—- 1988 — 2018
    White births* – 3.1 M – 1.9 M
    Non-White -—- 0.8 M – 1.9 M
     
    *white birth data is based on the race of the mother, in 2018 about 10% of white births will have non-white fathers, thus not be considered white.

    the 1990 census counted 122 million whites under the age of 40. In 2015 just 103 million whites under the age of 40 , a drop of 15% in 25 years. Any observed species which had such a significant decline would be considered threatened and in need of protection from the invaders to avoid extinction.

    “The fundamental issue facing the United States is the demographic collapse of whites due to the low fertility of whites.”

    You assume that all, or most, whites ought to be deathly concerned about low fertility. Perhaps normies are fine with how they are living their lives, thank you very much.

    Furthermore, YOU are characterizing as this “collapse”.

    “the 1990 census counted 122 million whites under the age of 40. In 2015 just 103 million whites under the age of 40, a drop of 15% in 25 years.”

    Or 19 million. It really depends upon how one looks at the numbers. Furthermore, could not there be other factors that accounts for this drop?

    “Any observed species which had such a significant decline would be considered threatened and in need of protection from the invaders to avoid extinction.”

    A decline, sure. The white race being “threatened” and “in need of protection”? Well, you are entitled to your own opinion.

    Praytell, how many white kids in your brood? If you do not have at least five in your homestead under the age of 10, you are not doing your part.

  58. @PiltdownMan
    Aside from the extraordinary population increase in sub-Saharan Africa beginning five decades or so ago, the growth in population in the Islamic world often gets overlooked.

    Saudi Arabia was a country of about 5.5 million at the time of the first OPEC oil crisis in the early 1970s. It is now a country of about 35 million.

    https://i.imgur.com/wjSHVzQ.jpg

    https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/saudi-arabia-population/

    Afghanistan, like Somalia, has nearly doubled its population in the 18 years of war it has experienced since we invaded.

    https://i.imgur.com/S8Uky1t.jpg

    https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/afghanistan-population/

    Curiously, Afghanistan's population declined during the war with the Soviets in the 1980s. I wonder what accounts for the difference in demographic trajectories.

    Well, historically, being “militarily defeated” and/or occupied by the US is one of the most lucrative things that can happen to a country.

  59. @Hannah Katz
    Increasingly the minority "leaders" are telling whites to go back to Europe. However, most European countries will not allow whites to immigrate there. Especially white South Africans, but really no whites are welcome. Third worlders, on the other hand... Right Angela?

    Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians, Europe for Africans and Asians. Once Europe is swamped, where will they go next, as America will be full of Latinos? Antarctica has lots of room.

    “Increasingly the minority “leaders” are telling whites to go back to Europe.”

    Indeed. The same people who smugly tell white Americans to go back to Europe also go apes___ over the idea of a white Europe.

  60. @Corvinus
    "The Fundamental Issue of 2020"...according to Garp, I mean, Mr. Sailer.

    America has always experienced this backlash political milieu, a sort of quasi-civil war: in one corner are the unpretentious and besieged "authentic Americans", and in the other corner are the hordes of the unwashed and the undesired. According to Who/Whom are contemptuous of the tastes and attitudes of the people who inhabit, or seek to inhabit, the "land of milk and honey". When the chairman of the Republican National Committee in announced in 1992 that "We Are America" and "those other people are not", he was providing yet another version of a century-old formula--"immigrants are the enemy of real Americans". The problem, of course, is that today's "authentic Americans" or "real Americans" tend not recall the trials and tribulations of their own ancestors.

    https://hti.osu.edu/opper/lesson-plans/immigration/images/looking-backward

    "America’s whites, as exemplified in the person of Donald Trump"

    I'm white, a number of my friends--liberal, libertarian, and conservative--are white, and suffice to say Trump does not exemplify us.

    In what other ways does Trump exemplify YOU, Mr. Sailer?

    "have the right to block the world’s blacks and Muslims"

    Of course American citizens have the right to reduce immigration and demand that our existing laws on the books be enforced. The problem is that Democrats and Republicans, as well as the Coalition of the Fringes, are reduced to party lines and one liners, rather than substantially addressing the issue.

    "as exemplified in the person of Somalia-born Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN)"

    She is no different than those who emigrated to our great land from other places in the world. The hopes, the dreams, the aspirations...they are the same. Remember, the Irish, the Italians, the Poles...ALL had been denigrated and downgraded by nativists as not being one of them. It made little difference that those three groups were European, they were deemed "inferior" and incapable of understanding the fundamentals of representative democracy. Somehow, someway, that mentality changed.


    Our old country was just as awesome as our current country and our new country of the future!

    She is no different than those who emigrated to our great land from other places in the world.

    Those who emigrated in the past and assimilated do differ from Omar. They were not enthusiastically working to destroy America. Omar is working to destroy America, because her allegiance is not to America.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "They were not enthusiastically working to destroy America."

    Talk about revisionist historian. The WASPs clearly believed that the foreign element would change for the worse. The Roman Catholic Italians, for example, with their criminal element, decidedly undermined the political and cultural institutions of Heritage Americans. Are you supporting magic dirt?

    "Omar is working to destroy America, because her allegiance is not to America."

    That would be your opinion. Thanks for sharing.
  61. @Corvinus
    "What if the assimilation of immigrants from places that are culturally and genetically very different from anything European does not occur?"

    You are assuming that it has not ever happened. Consider that the Chinese, Japanese, and Assyrians have immersed themselves quite well in our society.

    Moreover, the same argument was made by nativists (WASPs) toward their fellow Eastern/Southern European brethren. The influx of new immigrants led to apocalyptic predictions about the impending doom awaiting America — Italians, Jews, and Poles would impose their inferior biology, peculiar religious practices, and substandard ways of living onto this nation, founded by WASPs, thus lowering an elevated civilization. Simply put, these ethnicities were members of a lower biological order and were culturally inferior--dirty, less intelligent, criminal-prone.

    "Are you willing to take the risk of the US finding itself in such a diversity-driven mess 40 years from now that it cannot get out from under it?"

    You are assuming that is, or will be, a "diversity-driven mess". You do realize that the WASPs felt the same way about peoples who were "different" than them, right?

    The influx of new immigrants led to apocalyptic predictions about the impending doom awaiting America — Italians, Jews, and Poles would impose their inferior biology, peculiar religious practices, and substandard ways of living onto this nation, founded by WASPs, thus lowering an elevated civilization.

    As far as I can tell, the predictions were correct. The timescale was just longer than they imagined. The ranks of White liberals on the anti-White left are drawn heavily from the of descendants of 19th and early 20th century immigrants, and it was those immigrants and their children who provided the Democratic Party the power to implement its agenda through government, education and media throughout the 20th century and on into the present.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "As far as I can tell, the predictions were correct."

    What predictions?

    "The ranks of White liberals on the anti-White left are drawn heavily from the of descendants of 19th and early 20th century immigrant"

    According to Who/Whom? So you are willing to impugn tens of millions of immigrants whose offspring became "liberals" and "anti-whites"? I call B.S. What specific evidence are you able to show this evolutionary process?

    Furthermore, what does "anti-white" even mean? Do not whites have agency? Can they make up their own minds when it comes to race and culture, or must they automatically be in lockstep with your ideology, lest they be labeled as "cuck" or "anti-white"?

    "and it was those immigrants and their children who provided the Democratic Party the power to implement its agenda through government, education and media throughout the 20th century and on into the present."

    So, in essence, an entire group of white Europeans, chiefly from Eastern and Southern Europe, are to blame for our current situation. I thought victimhood was squarely a darkie thing.
    , @Pretzel Yardstick

    The influx of new immigrants led to apocalyptic predictions about the impending doom awaiting America — Italians, Jews, and Poles would impose their inferior biology, peculiar religious practices, and substandard ways of living onto this nation, founded by WASPs, thus lowering an elevated civilization.

    As far as I can tell, the predictions were correct.
     
    A century's time, the warm glow of Ellis Island nostalgia, and leftist immigration propaganda have all but erased from memory the very real degradation the first wave of mass immigration brought to the U.S. Slums, gangs, organized crime, and Zionist supremicism all derived from that earlier cheap-labor triumph. Life on these shores was coarsened to a degree that outweighed the occasional benefits.

    The political fallout was baneful as well. It was no accident that central government dominance overturned the original principles of the republic following the first generations of Communist-influenced European immigrants.
    , @prime noticer
    "As far as I can tell, the predictions were correct. The timescale was just longer than they imagined."

    mainly jews and the irish. you don't let in lots of people who hate you. and those were the two groups who hated america.

    today even boomer cons are coming around to accepting this as conventional wisdom, with regard to muslims and mexicans. but 150 years ago the average person knew the same thing about letting in millions of backstabbing jewish immigrants, or openly hostile irish immigrants who correctly saw America as the living embodiment of the hated WASP. and people said so back then, too. they warned against doing it. a few would have been fine, millions was a mistake. and they were correct.

    still, it's debatable whether allowing women to vote, having a solid bloc of africans who always vote 90% democrat, or letting in millions of jewish people was the single most damaging thing politically. all of those things moved the US to the left, but which did the most?

  62. @Corvinus
    "What if the assimilation of immigrants from places that are culturally and genetically very different from anything European does not occur?"

    You are assuming that it has not ever happened. Consider that the Chinese, Japanese, and Assyrians have immersed themselves quite well in our society.

    Moreover, the same argument was made by nativists (WASPs) toward their fellow Eastern/Southern European brethren. The influx of new immigrants led to apocalyptic predictions about the impending doom awaiting America — Italians, Jews, and Poles would impose their inferior biology, peculiar religious practices, and substandard ways of living onto this nation, founded by WASPs, thus lowering an elevated civilization. Simply put, these ethnicities were members of a lower biological order and were culturally inferior--dirty, less intelligent, criminal-prone.

    "Are you willing to take the risk of the US finding itself in such a diversity-driven mess 40 years from now that it cannot get out from under it?"

    You are assuming that is, or will be, a "diversity-driven mess". You do realize that the WASPs felt the same way about peoples who were "different" than them, right?

    Just because several thousand civilized Japanese or Germans assimilated back when America was strong and had no welfare state doesnt mean millions of uncivilized Somalis and Aztecs can assimilate now.

    The dosage is the poison.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "Just because several thousand civilized Japanese or Germans assimilated back when America was strong and had no welfare state doesnt mean millions of uncivilized Somalis and Aztecs can assimilate now."

    First, you forget that the Germans and Japanese were viewed by nativists as being uncivilized and incapable of being assimilated. Were the nativists wrong? In what specific ways?

    Second, you assume that the Somalis and Mexicans (not Aztecs) are uncivilized. Perhaps we need to clarify a term here. From your perspective, what does "uncivilized" mean?
  63. @Peripatetic Commenter
    Nope. The fundamental issue is that White People love dogs because they miss owning slaves!

    Don't deny it wypipo!

    https://pjmedia.com/trending/liberals-tweet-goes-viral-white-people-love-dogs-because-they-miss-owning-slaves/

    Racisssss, racisss, racisss, racisss! Say it four times before breakfast and you will feel better!

    Conversely, blackpipo don’t like dogs or pets in general because their r-selection doesn’t favor nurturing, affection, or empathy.

  64. eah says:

    Fundamental Issue of 2020

    Oh and it’s way too late to see this as a ‘fundamental issue’.

    …America’s whites…have the right to block the world’s blacks and Muslims…from immigrating en masse to the United States.

    It’s too late because the political answer to this has already been decided: it’s ‘No’, and has been for a long time, even among ‘conservatives’ — that fact is the reason the Alt-Right exists.

    Here “en masse” should rightly be seen as: in large enough numbers to make Whites minorities in their countries — the census has been projecting that as an inevitability for some time now, and no establishment politician has ever made it an issue, let alone a ‘fundamental issue’ — in fact it’s more the opposite: they’ve welcomed it or actively campaigned for it (‘diversity is strength’).

    • Replies: @eah
    It’s too late because the political answer to this has already been decided: it’s ‘No’, and has been for a long time, even among ‘conservatives’ — that fact is the reason the Alt-Right exists.

    https://twitter.com/WolfNationalist/status/1152061775531126784
  65. Anonymous[304] • Disclaimer says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    . The only reason why blacks dropped the Negro League was because they knew they could beat whites and take over white sports, in effect turning them into Negro-Dominant-League.
     
    The Negro Leagues were in baseball, which blacks have never "dominated". If anything, they're Latin-dominated.

    Blacks are disappearing from baseball.

    The Negro Leagues were in baseball, which blacks have never “dominated”. If anything, they’re Latin-dominated.
    Blacks are disappearing from baseball.

    Blacks were once big in baseball as super sluggers. But American blacks figured basketball and football are more glamorous and sexy, and indeed, basketball and football players are more celebrated as athletes than anyone in baseball.

    As for ‘latinos’ in baseball, most of them are black or mulatto from places like the Dominican Republic.

  66. @Cloudbuster
    The influx of new immigrants led to apocalyptic predictions about the impending doom awaiting America — Italians, Jews, and Poles would impose their inferior biology, peculiar religious practices, and substandard ways of living onto this nation, founded by WASPs, thus lowering an elevated civilization.

    As far as I can tell, the predictions were correct. The timescale was just longer than they imagined. The ranks of White liberals on the anti-White left are drawn heavily from the of descendants of 19th and early 20th century immigrants, and it was those immigrants and their children who provided the Democratic Party the power to implement its agenda through government, education and media throughout the 20th century and on into the present.

    “As far as I can tell, the predictions were correct.”

    What predictions?

    “The ranks of White liberals on the anti-White left are drawn heavily from the of descendants of 19th and early 20th century immigrant”

    According to Who/Whom? So you are willing to impugn tens of millions of immigrants whose offspring became “liberals” and “anti-whites”? I call B.S. What specific evidence are you able to show this evolutionary process?

    Furthermore, what does “anti-white” even mean? Do not whites have agency? Can they make up their own minds when it comes to race and culture, or must they automatically be in lockstep with your ideology, lest they be labeled as “cuck” or “anti-white”?

    “and it was those immigrants and their children who provided the Democratic Party the power to implement its agenda through government, education and media throughout the 20th century and on into the present.”

    So, in essence, an entire group of white Europeans, chiefly from Eastern and Southern Europe, are to blame for our current situation. I thought victimhood was squarely a darkie thing.

  67. @Neuday
    Just because several thousand civilized Japanese or Germans assimilated back when America was strong and had no welfare state doesnt mean millions of uncivilized Somalis and Aztecs can assimilate now.

    The dosage is the poison.

    “Just because several thousand civilized Japanese or Germans assimilated back when America was strong and had no welfare state doesnt mean millions of uncivilized Somalis and Aztecs can assimilate now.”

    First, you forget that the Germans and Japanese were viewed by nativists as being uncivilized and incapable of being assimilated. Were the nativists wrong? In what specific ways?

    Second, you assume that the Somalis and Mexicans (not Aztecs) are uncivilized. Perhaps we need to clarify a term here. From your perspective, what does “uncivilized” mean?

    • Replies: @Another German Reader
    Not uncivilized, but socio-political dysfunctional
  68. @Charles Erwin Wilson 3

    She is no different than those who emigrated to our great land from other places in the world.
     
    Those who emigrated in the past and assimilated do differ from Omar. They were not enthusiastically working to destroy America. Omar is working to destroy America, because her allegiance is not to America.

    “They were not enthusiastically working to destroy America.”

    Talk about revisionist historian. The WASPs clearly believed that the foreign element would change for the worse. The Roman Catholic Italians, for example, with their criminal element, decidedly undermined the political and cultural institutions of Heritage Americans. Are you supporting magic dirt?

    “Omar is working to destroy America, because her allegiance is not to America.”

    That would be your opinion. Thanks for sharing.

    • Replies: @Charles Erwin Wilson 3

    That would be your opinion.
     
    Actually, it is your opinion that my claim is my opinion. Your reply was content free. I made a factual observation, and you provided your typical limp-wristed response, once again demonstrating the vacuity of your positions.
  69. @PiltdownMan
    Aside from the extraordinary population increase in sub-Saharan Africa beginning five decades or so ago, the growth in population in the Islamic world often gets overlooked.

    Saudi Arabia was a country of about 5.5 million at the time of the first OPEC oil crisis in the early 1970s. It is now a country of about 35 million.

    https://i.imgur.com/wjSHVzQ.jpg

    https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/saudi-arabia-population/

    Afghanistan, like Somalia, has nearly doubled its population in the 18 years of war it has experienced since we invaded.

    https://i.imgur.com/S8Uky1t.jpg

    https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/afghanistan-population/

    Curiously, Afghanistan's population declined during the war with the Soviets in the 1980s. I wonder what accounts for the difference in demographic trajectories.

    Partial explanation of the Afghan figures:

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afghans_in_Pakistan

  70. @Cowboy Shaw
    In rugby it's very noticeable that the three significant races in the sport, black, whites, Polynesians, all seem to have different strengths, and none appears to have decisive advantages over the other. The aerobic requirements of the sport seem to balance out the advantages blacks have in power and polynesians have in athleticsm and muscularity.

    There's one other group and that's Melanesians (Fijians only only - Vanuatuans and Solomon Islanders have had almost no impact on the sport). There aren't many of them, but Fijians seem to be off the charts ahead of blacks even in explosive speed and strength and agility. I don't think any group comes close.

    I believe the theory is that as the early Polynesians grazed Melanesia about 2,000 years ago they got some Melanesian genes and that turned them from docile Micronesians into super charged Polynesians.

    The bloke who is widely considered the greatest rugby player of all, Richie McCaw, is just a white bloke from the South Island with Scottish genetics. His strengths were aerobic capacity, superhuman toughness and intelligence.

    Hating the English helps in rugby, too: Maoris, Scots, Welsh, French, Boers, Argentines…

  71. @Cloudbuster
    The influx of new immigrants led to apocalyptic predictions about the impending doom awaiting America — Italians, Jews, and Poles would impose their inferior biology, peculiar religious practices, and substandard ways of living onto this nation, founded by WASPs, thus lowering an elevated civilization.

    As far as I can tell, the predictions were correct. The timescale was just longer than they imagined. The ranks of White liberals on the anti-White left are drawn heavily from the of descendants of 19th and early 20th century immigrants, and it was those immigrants and their children who provided the Democratic Party the power to implement its agenda through government, education and media throughout the 20th century and on into the present.

    The influx of new immigrants led to apocalyptic predictions about the impending doom awaiting America — Italians, Jews, and Poles would impose their inferior biology, peculiar religious practices, and substandard ways of living onto this nation, founded by WASPs, thus lowering an elevated civilization.

    As far as I can tell, the predictions were correct.

    A century’s time, the warm glow of Ellis Island nostalgia, and leftist immigration propaganda have all but erased from memory the very real degradation the first wave of mass immigration brought to the U.S. Slums, gangs, organized crime, and Zionist supremicism all derived from that earlier cheap-labor triumph. Life on these shores was coarsened to a degree that outweighed the occasional benefits.

    The political fallout was baneful as well. It was no accident that central government dominance overturned the original principles of the republic following the first generations of Communist-influenced European immigrants.

    • Replies: @Corn
    “A century’s time, the warm glow of Ellis Island nostalgia, and leftist immigration propaganda have all but erased from memory the very real degradation the first wave of mass immigration brought to the U.S. Slums, gangs, organized crime, and Zionist supremicism all derived from that earlier cheap-labor triumph. Life on these shores was coarsened to a degree that outweighed the occasional benefits.”

    To give an example Michael Barone noted in his book The New Americans that when the Irish came to your town in the 19th century, it was bad news. It meant more poverty, crime, street violence, maybe even an outbreak of cholera before modern sewage systems.

    Steve also noted years ago on his old iSteve site that the so called Great Wave of late 19th century was also a huge blow to honest government in urban America. It saw the rise of machine politics.

    I’m the great-great grandson of Irish immigrants. I’m grateful they were let in. But I’m not going to throw hate at the natives who wanted them kept out either.
  72. It really isn’t about racial equality. America is devoted to non-white supremacy. Not only do we see white people and culture as bereft and evil, but we fetishize the other. Whites see non-whites as vibrant, culturally enriching, and even more moral. Their diversity is what gives us our strength.

    And America is devoted to white dispossession. When whites become a minority we will be deprived of the ability to determine our own future. We will become a stateless minority like the Gypsies or Jews before Zionism. Without the basic right to self-determination we have no dignity and are a conquered and dependent people.

    Diversity always leads to racial hierarchy. Non-whites will always advance their own interests and push for the advantage even if whites refuse to. One group will always have more power, wealth, or influence than other groups because of greater solidarity, merit, or sheer numbers. Replacing a white majority with a non-white majority doesn’t end racial hierarchy, it just changes who the dominant group is. The only truly egalitarian solution to racial hierarchy is separation. That way no race or ethnic group has to live under the political, cultural, or economic dominance of another. Otherwise it’s a choice between white supremacy and non-white supremacy, and we must take our own side.

    South Africa is a black supremacist country because blacks have political and cultural dominance over whites and are determined to take their wealth. America will also be a non-white supremacist country when whites are the minority. Whites will be politically and culturally marginalized and alienated and will be removed from the American mainstream and norm. They will mostly see non-whites in movies and on television and white culture will become a mere sideshow. No race or ethnic group should have to live like that, which is why we need separate ethnostates where our own people and culture can reign supreme.

    All healthy individuals and groups should have a will to live and to flourish that needs no justification. We should want to be fruitful and multiply, not stagnate and decline like the sick and moribund. If it’s legitimate to seek the well-being and survival of the human species as a whole, then it’s also perfectly legitimate to seek the well-being and survival of specific races and ethnic groups.

  73. @Spangel
    Saudi Arabia’s tfr is stabilizing and will likely be at replacement within 10 years. Somalia on the other hand...

    There is something about blacks. They are the only ones who have difficulty containing fertility rates across most nations they run.

    There would either be a mass die off or mass emigration. As of now, the latter is occurring.

  74. @Hannah Katz
    Increasingly the minority "leaders" are telling whites to go back to Europe. However, most European countries will not allow whites to immigrate there. Especially white South Africans, but really no whites are welcome. Third worlders, on the other hand... Right Angela?

    Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians, Europe for Africans and Asians. Once Europe is swamped, where will they go next, as America will be full of Latinos? Antarctica has lots of room.

    If Whites go back to Europe, who will keep the electricity running and pay the welfare bills?

    If and when non-Whites gain control of America, the different factions that make up the Democratic Party would turn on each other and tear each other apart. Only two things unites the Democratic party: they are “warring tribes in the common pursuit of plunder” and hatred of Whites, which to non-Whites, includes Jews.

    Blacks probably figure they would be in control. Wishful thinking because Asians and Hispanics regard them as inferior, the hewers of wood and drawers of water. Ironically enough, only Whites respect them. Maybe they would try to follow Whites to Europe.

    • Replies: @RadicalCenter
    Africans can’t be stupid enough to think that they will prevail in the USA if it collapses and/or whites flee or are killed en masse. Africans will be outnumbered here nationally three to one by Mexicans alone. Not even counting the tens of millions of other non-African Latinos that will be here.

    The new Hispanic majority will be mostly not white, and they don’t suffer any misplaced guilt about the British, Arab, and Jewish enslavement of Africans. Nor will the new Hispanic majority of the USA offer preferences to Africans in college admissions and corporate and government hiring. That, at least, will be gratifying to see.

  75. @Cloudbuster
    The influx of new immigrants led to apocalyptic predictions about the impending doom awaiting America — Italians, Jews, and Poles would impose their inferior biology, peculiar religious practices, and substandard ways of living onto this nation, founded by WASPs, thus lowering an elevated civilization.

    As far as I can tell, the predictions were correct. The timescale was just longer than they imagined. The ranks of White liberals on the anti-White left are drawn heavily from the of descendants of 19th and early 20th century immigrants, and it was those immigrants and their children who provided the Democratic Party the power to implement its agenda through government, education and media throughout the 20th century and on into the present.

    “As far as I can tell, the predictions were correct. The timescale was just longer than they imagined.”

    mainly jews and the irish. you don’t let in lots of people who hate you. and those were the two groups who hated america.

    today even boomer cons are coming around to accepting this as conventional wisdom, with regard to muslims and mexicans. but 150 years ago the average person knew the same thing about letting in millions of backstabbing jewish immigrants, or openly hostile irish immigrants who correctly saw America as the living embodiment of the hated WASP. and people said so back then, too. they warned against doing it. a few would have been fine, millions was a mistake. and they were correct.

    still, it’s debatable whether allowing women to vote, having a solid bloc of africans who always vote 90% democrat, or letting in millions of jewish people was the single most damaging thing politically. all of those things moved the US to the left, but which did the most?

  76. @Corvinus
    "They were not enthusiastically working to destroy America."

    Talk about revisionist historian. The WASPs clearly believed that the foreign element would change for the worse. The Roman Catholic Italians, for example, with their criminal element, decidedly undermined the political and cultural institutions of Heritage Americans. Are you supporting magic dirt?

    "Omar is working to destroy America, because her allegiance is not to America."

    That would be your opinion. Thanks for sharing.

    That would be your opinion.

    Actually, it is your opinion that my claim is my opinion. Your reply was content free. I made a factual observation, and you provided your typical limp-wristed response, once again demonstrating the vacuity of your positions.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "I made a factual observation."

    No, you gave your opinion --> "Omar is working to destroy America, because her allegiance is not to America".
  77. @Spangel
    Saudi Arabia’s tfr is stabilizing and will likely be at replacement within 10 years. Somalia on the other hand...

    There is something about blacks. They are the only ones who have difficulty containing fertility rates across most nations they run.

    Even if TFR stabilize, due the age-structure a country will continue to grow for around 4/5 decades.

    e.g.: Vietnam

    – population in 1980: 54million people @ TFR @ 5.8 children @ 1.1 million babies

    – population in 2000: 80 million people @ TFR @ 2,2 children @ 1.05 million babies

    – population in 2018: 96 million @ TFR @ 1.9 children @ 935k babies

    – projected population-peak (assuming zero immigration): 2045 @ 115 million @ TFR @ 1.5 children @ 800k babies

    –> many countries have a lowering TFR, but due the slow rate their aboslute growth is still accerlerating.

    –> KEEP IN MIND:

    – Vietnam has got a very serious family-planning program since the late 1970s.

    – Vietnam has got massive abortion-numbers @ 1.4 abortions per woman

    – Vietnam has made deep structural reforms since 1987 -> This enabled an average economic growth of 7% in the last 32 years. Something other developing countries don’t have.

    – Vietnam benefits tremendous from the fellow Confucian societies (China, Taiwan, Korea, Japan, Honkong, Singapore) when it comes to loans, FDI, expertise, solutions and know-how/tech. Something neither the Arabs/Afghan/Pakistanis/SS-Africans have.

    – Despite being the darling of labor-intensive industries only 15% of the VN workforce is employed in manufacturing/construction vs 25% for S-Korea at the same stage of development -> industrial robots/automation

    – From the closing stage of the war until the beginning of the reforms in 1987 around 600k migrants have left Vietnam – ranging from guest-workers in E-Europe to Boat People.

    – But from the reforms on nearly 3 million have left the country. Current rate is at 130k emigrants per year.

    CONCLUSION: Arabs/Africans/Pakistanis are f*****.

    • Replies: @Anonymous

    CONCLUSION: Arabs/Africans/Pakistanis are f*****.
     
    The real implication is that Europe and the Anglosphere are fucked.
    , @UrbaneFrancoOntarian
    Arabs/Africans/Pakis will just move to Canada, UK, and the USA. We are literally the valve that lets off population steam from those regions. They'll just take over here and keep breeding, unless we keep them out.
  78. @Corvinus
    "Just because several thousand civilized Japanese or Germans assimilated back when America was strong and had no welfare state doesnt mean millions of uncivilized Somalis and Aztecs can assimilate now."

    First, you forget that the Germans and Japanese were viewed by nativists as being uncivilized and incapable of being assimilated. Were the nativists wrong? In what specific ways?

    Second, you assume that the Somalis and Mexicans (not Aztecs) are uncivilized. Perhaps we need to clarify a term here. From your perspective, what does "uncivilized" mean?

    Not uncivilized, but socio-political dysfunctional

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "Not uncivilized, but socio-political dysfunctional".

    Please elaborate.

    Now, just on the surface, wouldn't our current system of government due to the machinations of each political party, as well the Coalition of The Fringes Left and Right, constitute "social-political dysfunction"?
  79. @Charles Erwin Wilson 3

    That would be your opinion.
     
    Actually, it is your opinion that my claim is my opinion. Your reply was content free. I made a factual observation, and you provided your typical limp-wristed response, once again demonstrating the vacuity of your positions.

    “I made a factual observation.”

    No, you gave your opinion –> “Omar is working to destroy America, because her allegiance is not to America”.

  80. @Pretzel Yardstick

    The influx of new immigrants led to apocalyptic predictions about the impending doom awaiting America — Italians, Jews, and Poles would impose their inferior biology, peculiar religious practices, and substandard ways of living onto this nation, founded by WASPs, thus lowering an elevated civilization.

    As far as I can tell, the predictions were correct.
     
    A century's time, the warm glow of Ellis Island nostalgia, and leftist immigration propaganda have all but erased from memory the very real degradation the first wave of mass immigration brought to the U.S. Slums, gangs, organized crime, and Zionist supremicism all derived from that earlier cheap-labor triumph. Life on these shores was coarsened to a degree that outweighed the occasional benefits.

    The political fallout was baneful as well. It was no accident that central government dominance overturned the original principles of the republic following the first generations of Communist-influenced European immigrants.

    “A century’s time, the warm glow of Ellis Island nostalgia, and leftist immigration propaganda have all but erased from memory the very real degradation the first wave of mass immigration brought to the U.S. Slums, gangs, organized crime, and Zionist supremicism all derived from that earlier cheap-labor triumph. Life on these shores was coarsened to a degree that outweighed the occasional benefits.”

    To give an example Michael Barone noted in his book The New Americans that when the Irish came to your town in the 19th century, it was bad news. It meant more poverty, crime, street violence, maybe even an outbreak of cholera before modern sewage systems.

    Steve also noted years ago on his old iSteve site that the so called Great Wave of late 19th century was also a huge blow to honest government in urban America. It saw the rise of machine politics.

    I’m the great-great grandson of Irish immigrants. I’m grateful they were let in. But I’m not going to throw hate at the natives who wanted them kept out either.

    • Agree: Cortes
  81. @Another German Reader
    Not uncivilized, but socio-political dysfunctional

    “Not uncivilized, but socio-political dysfunctional”.

    Please elaborate.

    Now, just on the surface, wouldn’t our current system of government due to the machinations of each political party, as well the Coalition of The Fringes Left and Right, constitute “social-political dysfunction”?

  82. Anonymous[388] • Disclaimer says:
    @Another German Reader
    Even if TFR stabilize, due the age-structure a country will continue to grow for around 4/5 decades.

    e.g.: Vietnam

    - population in 1980: 54million people @ TFR @ 5.8 children @ 1.1 million babies

    - population in 2000: 80 million people @ TFR @ 2,2 children @ 1.05 million babies

    - population in 2018: 96 million @ TFR @ 1.9 children @ 935k babies

    - projected population-peak (assuming zero immigration): 2045 @ 115 million @ TFR @ 1.5 children @ 800k babies

    --> many countries have a lowering TFR, but due the slow rate their aboslute growth is still accerlerating.

    --> KEEP IN MIND:

    - Vietnam has got a very serious family-planning program since the late 1970s.

    - Vietnam has got massive abortion-numbers @ 1.4 abortions per woman

    - Vietnam has made deep structural reforms since 1987 -> This enabled an average economic growth of 7% in the last 32 years. Something other developing countries don't have.

    - Vietnam benefits tremendous from the fellow Confucian societies (China, Taiwan, Korea, Japan, Honkong, Singapore) when it comes to loans, FDI, expertise, solutions and know-how/tech. Something neither the Arabs/Afghan/Pakistanis/SS-Africans have.

    - Despite being the darling of labor-intensive industries only 15% of the VN workforce is employed in manufacturing/construction vs 25% for S-Korea at the same stage of development -> industrial robots/automation

    - From the closing stage of the war until the beginning of the reforms in 1987 around 600k migrants have left Vietnam - ranging from guest-workers in E-Europe to Boat People.

    - But from the reforms on nearly 3 million have left the country. Current rate is at 130k emigrants per year.

    CONCLUSION: Arabs/Africans/Pakistanis are f*****.

    CONCLUSION: Arabs/Africans/Pakistanis are f*****.

    The real implication is that Europe and the Anglosphere are fucked.

  83. @Cowboy Shaw
    In rugby it's very noticeable that the three significant races in the sport, black, whites, Polynesians, all seem to have different strengths, and none appears to have decisive advantages over the other. The aerobic requirements of the sport seem to balance out the advantages blacks have in power and polynesians have in athleticsm and muscularity.

    There's one other group and that's Melanesians (Fijians only only - Vanuatuans and Solomon Islanders have had almost no impact on the sport). There aren't many of them, but Fijians seem to be off the charts ahead of blacks even in explosive speed and strength and agility. I don't think any group comes close.

    I believe the theory is that as the early Polynesians grazed Melanesia about 2,000 years ago they got some Melanesian genes and that turned them from docile Micronesians into super charged Polynesians.

    The bloke who is widely considered the greatest rugby player of all, Richie McCaw, is just a white bloke from the South Island with Scottish genetics. His strengths were aerobic capacity, superhuman toughness and intelligence.

    Great observations.

    Rugby is a really good game, as you say, in the variety of athletic gifts it rewards. And the Fijians are something else. But the most impressive player I’ve ever seen is still the legendary Jonah Lomu, a New Zealander from a Maori background, who was enormous (6′ 5″, 275), but moved like he was on jetpacks. He was incredible to watch.

  84. @Ris_Eruwaedhiel
    If Whites go back to Europe, who will keep the electricity running and pay the welfare bills?

    If and when non-Whites gain control of America, the different factions that make up the Democratic Party would turn on each other and tear each other apart. Only two things unites the Democratic party: they are "warring tribes in the common pursuit of plunder" and hatred of Whites, which to non-Whites, includes Jews.

    Blacks probably figure they would be in control. Wishful thinking because Asians and Hispanics regard them as inferior, the hewers of wood and drawers of water. Ironically enough, only Whites respect them. Maybe they would try to follow Whites to Europe.

    Africans can’t be stupid enough to think that they will prevail in the USA if it collapses and/or whites flee or are killed en masse. Africans will be outnumbered here nationally three to one by Mexicans alone. Not even counting the tens of millions of other non-African Latinos that will be here.

    The new Hispanic majority will be mostly not white, and they don’t suffer any misplaced guilt about the British, Arab, and Jewish enslavement of Africans. Nor will the new Hispanic majority of the USA offer preferences to Africans in college admissions and corporate and government hiring. That, at least, will be gratifying to see.

  85. @eah
    Fundamental Issue of 2020

    Oh and it's way too late to see this as a 'fundamental issue'.

    ...America’s whites...have the right to block the world’s blacks and Muslims...from immigrating en masse to the United States.

    It's too late because the political answer to this has already been decided: it's 'No', and has been for a long time, even among 'conservatives' -- that fact is the reason the Alt-Right exists.

    Here "en masse" should rightly be seen as: in large enough numbers to make Whites minorities in their countries -- the census has been projecting that as an inevitability for some time now, and no establishment politician has ever made it an issue, let alone a 'fundamental issue' -- in fact it's more the opposite: they've welcomed it or actively campaigned for it ('diversity is strength').

    It’s too late because the political answer to this has already been decided: it’s ‘No’, and has been for a long time, even among ‘conservatives’ — that fact is the reason the Alt-Right exists.

    • LOL: IHTG
  86. @Another German Reader
    Even if TFR stabilize, due the age-structure a country will continue to grow for around 4/5 decades.

    e.g.: Vietnam

    - population in 1980: 54million people @ TFR @ 5.8 children @ 1.1 million babies

    - population in 2000: 80 million people @ TFR @ 2,2 children @ 1.05 million babies

    - population in 2018: 96 million @ TFR @ 1.9 children @ 935k babies

    - projected population-peak (assuming zero immigration): 2045 @ 115 million @ TFR @ 1.5 children @ 800k babies

    --> many countries have a lowering TFR, but due the slow rate their aboslute growth is still accerlerating.

    --> KEEP IN MIND:

    - Vietnam has got a very serious family-planning program since the late 1970s.

    - Vietnam has got massive abortion-numbers @ 1.4 abortions per woman

    - Vietnam has made deep structural reforms since 1987 -> This enabled an average economic growth of 7% in the last 32 years. Something other developing countries don't have.

    - Vietnam benefits tremendous from the fellow Confucian societies (China, Taiwan, Korea, Japan, Honkong, Singapore) when it comes to loans, FDI, expertise, solutions and know-how/tech. Something neither the Arabs/Afghan/Pakistanis/SS-Africans have.

    - Despite being the darling of labor-intensive industries only 15% of the VN workforce is employed in manufacturing/construction vs 25% for S-Korea at the same stage of development -> industrial robots/automation

    - From the closing stage of the war until the beginning of the reforms in 1987 around 600k migrants have left Vietnam - ranging from guest-workers in E-Europe to Boat People.

    - But from the reforms on nearly 3 million have left the country. Current rate is at 130k emigrants per year.

    CONCLUSION: Arabs/Africans/Pakistanis are f*****.

    Arabs/Africans/Pakis will just move to Canada, UK, and the USA. We are literally the valve that lets off population steam from those regions. They’ll just take over here and keep breeding, unless we keep them out.

  87. @eah
    The fundamental issue of the 2020 presidential campaign is rapidly becoming whether or not America’s whites, as exemplified in the person of Donald Trump, have the right to block the world’s blacks and Muslims, as exemplified in the person of Somalia-born Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN), from immigrating en masse to the United States.

    The same question could (and should) be asked of Europe and Europeans.

    Ursula von der Leyen, CDU Politikerin, formerly (just resigned) German defense minister (generally considered a huge failure in that position), was recently elected new EU commission president, replacing drunkard Jean-Claude Juncker -- as part of her campaign for that job, she said she was born and felt European before she later learned ("gelernt habe") she was German (if you can and want to believe that) -- so her goal is to unite and strengthen the EU (#Europa):

    https://twitter.com/vonderleyen/status/1151084398370074624

    Still, seven children. That’s something worth emulating.

    That she was not only considered a weak minister, but also a corrupt one, is icing on the s*** cake, given how much the EU emotes with regards to good governance, anti-corruption etc.

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to All Steve Sailer Comments via RSS