The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 TeasersiSteve Blog
NYT: Biden-Voting Mom Worries Her 3 White Sons, Ages 8, 5, and 1, Have Too Much White Privilege
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

From the New York Times news section:

In Ohio, a Father and Stepdaughter Show the Political Shifts in the Trump Era

He’s a union worker and former Democrat now solidly behind President Trump. She’s a onetime Republican now worried about her sons growing up in the Trump era. Family get-togethers can be difficult.

By Reid J. Epstein
Aug. 23, 2020

… Ms. Boorn was apprehensive, worried about climate change, about what her sons were learning by growing up white in America. Now she is worried about the prospect of four more years with Mr. Trump in the White House.

“My husband and I both grew up in northeast Ohio and it’s rural,” she said. “There are people who are openly racist. Coming down to Columbus, we made friends with people of all colors and all religions and it’s so hard to tell people who don’t see that these are just people — it’s not what you see on Fox News.”

Then came the coronavirus pandemic, which wreaked havoc on the state’s economy, while protests against police treatment of Black Americans took place in cities both large and small. Mr. Moore complained on his Facebook profile page about being forced to wear a mask at work, while Ms. Boorn put a Black Lives Matter sign on her car.

“It’s hard raising white men in America,” she said of her three boys, ages 8, 5 and 16 months. “You want to understand that they understand their position as an ally.”

… Last week Ms. Boorn watched most of the virtual Democratic National Convention. She was inspired by Brayden Harrington, the 13-year-old whom Mr. Biden helped deal with a severe stutter, and was moved by Ms. Harris’s stories of her upbringing in the civil rights movement.

“She inspired me when she said that someday we will look back at this time and remember what we did, not what we thought,” she said. “That’s what pushed me out of my comfort zone previously. I want my boys to remember this.”

 
Hide 224 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. Someday I will look back at Kamala Harris’ speech,and I will say to myself, “Man,what a load of shit!”

    • Agree: bomag
    • Replies: @Adam Smith
    @Giancarlo M. Kumquat

    Someday?

  2. How has she reached a point in her life where she values the narrative in her head more than real connection?

    • Replies: @Ed
    @Not Only Wrathful

    I think this Tiabbi tweet is apt:
    https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1297689155292495874?s=21

    , @Ed
    @Not Only Wrathful

    I think this Tiabbi tweet is apt:
    https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1297689155292495874?s=21

    , @bomag
    @Not Only Wrathful

    1) Reveals the power of coordinated propaganda and group think that starts in kindergarten and is reinforced by media and work rules etc.

    2) Some people get a thrill and are prone to hating on family members and those close to them.

    , @JimDandy
    @Not Only Wrathful

    Men--including sons--now exist only as disposable tools for serving the narcissistic needs of women.

  3. OT: Rioting and looting in Kenosha, WI, tonight after cops shot a black man there.

  4. The Boorn Identity.

    Fascinating fiction.

    • Agree: Alden
  5. “It’s hard raising white men in America,” she said of her three boys, ages 8, 5 and 16 months. “You want to understand that they understand their position as an ally.”

    What a bunch of mush. “understand that they understand….” Can’t people even speak clearly anymore? What does this woman even mean by that?

    • Replies: @J.Ross
    @Mr. Anon

    The Uncle Buck nickel speech. I don't want to know an eight year old who is environmentally or societally responsible.

    Replies: @Kolya Krassotkin

    , @JohnnyWalker123
    @Mr. Anon

    Watch this 48 second video from "The Simpsons."

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8lcUHQYhPTE

    That video represents exactly what she's doing.

    She's just being a bit coy about it.

    See below quote.


    Ladies and gentlemen, uh, we've just lost the picture, but what we've seen speaks for itself. The Corvair spacecraft has apparently been taken over, 'conquered' if you will, by a master race of giant space ants. It's difficult to tell from this vantage point whether they will consume the captive Earthmen or merely enslave them. One thing is for certain: there is no stopping them; the ants will soon be here. And I, for one, welcome our new insect overlords. I'd like to remind them as a trusted TV personality, I can be helpful in rounding up others to toil in their underground sugar caves.

     

    At this point, White Gentiles have a choice.

    1. Fight back against their Jewish&Black overlords, risking their job, reputation, finances, and even their physical safety.

    2. Collaborate and become an "ally." Help the Jewish&Black overlords to crush their White Conservatives enemies. In the process, get rewarded with a good job, status, and a safe life.

    3. Stay silent and see what happens.

    This woman is openly declaring that she's collaborating with the insects. She will help the insects capture you. Then she (and her sons) will go on to good lives, while you toil in the underground sugar cave.

    "The Simpons" isn't just a funny cartoon. It actually offers remarkably good insight into human psychology.

    Replies: @V. Hickel

    , @Kolya Krassotkin
    @Mr. Anon

    Anyone who worries about the politics of her 8, 5 and 6 month old son has plenty of screws loose.

    But note that Ms. Boorn is the left-wing step daughter of a conservative dad, so she's not from his gene pool, and how ironic that it's probanly his conservative principles that made him a man sufficiently of the stand-up sort to nurture her as a child.

    , @Alec Leamas (hard at work)
    @Mr. Anon



    “It’s hard raising white men in America,” she said of her three boys, ages 8, 5 and 16 months. “You want to understand that they understand their position as an ally.”
     
    What a bunch of mush. “understand that they understand….” Can’t people even speak clearly anymore? What does this woman even mean by that?

     

    Ostensibly it means "I will punch into these kids' heads sufficient self-loathing for their white skin that they will grow to sublimate it and direct their hatred towards badwhites."

    The jargonese is part of the appeal - it's nonsensical and opaque, but it's a marker of this woman's aspirations to be part of the managerial elite class.
    , @Lagertha
    @Mr. Anon

    incredibly stupid and uneducated women like this creep should have not been allowed to have children. One good point about working women in Democrat cities would be if they became so infertile that they can not conceive anymore. Similarly, I would be fine with every leftist Coastal woman to have an abortion way into their 40's - Democrat-voting white women do not deserve to have sons. Democrat women do not deserve to have children.

    I love my sons, and I so, sooo hate American leftist/Democrat women. They are monsters and will harm their sons. They are a danger to humanity. They need to be censored and shamed forever...hahhahhahahaaaa!

    Replies: @jsm

  6. The marriage is doomed.

    • Agree: Kronos, fish
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    @Bernard


    The marriage is doomed.
     
    and so are the kids.

    Replies: @ben tillman, @ari silver

    , @3g4me
    @Bernard

    @6 Bernard: Who gives a f&*k about their marriage? I feel sorrow and terror at the future of those poor little White boys - already pathologized by their hysterical mother. Women are out of control, and while they and their irrational emotions run rampant, the world burns.

    , @res
    @Bernard

    The excerpt is a bit confusing. He is Dan Moore and she is Kelley Boorn who is Moore's stepdaughter--not her husband. I think this additional context both clarifies things and makes the allegiances much more interesting.


    Before Donald J. Trump began his first presidential campaign, Mr. Moore was a reliable Democrat who had twice voted for Barack Obama. Like legions of white union workers, he found Mr. Trump’s 2016 campaign pledge to shake up Washington appealing. He plans to vote for him again in November.

    Two hours away in Columbus, Ohio, Mr. Moore’s stepdaughter, Kelley Boorn, cheered Ms. Harris’s selection. A longtime Republican who was once a vehement anti-abortion activist, her views shifted after a difficult pregnancy. She went from being a one-issue voter and an enthusiastic backer of John McCain’s in 2008, to sitting out in 2012 to becoming an enthusiastic Democratic voter in 2016 and 2020.
     
    , @ScarletNumber
    @Bernard

    The man mentioned in the article is her stepfather, not her husband. This article is proof of why you should never marry a woman with children, BTW.

  7. I bet she’s on social media telling everybody about it which is what it’s really about.

    • Agree: Rosie
    • Replies: @OscarWildeLoveChild
    @Neo-Socratic

    100 percent.

  8. OT: This is shaping up to be a real immigrant success story – Surgisphere, the company at the heart of the retracted Lancet study on hydroxychloroquine.

    https://www.medpagetoday.com/special-reports/exclusives/87020

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surgisphere

    • Replies: @HammerJack
    @Mr. Anon

    Speaking of immigrants and the NYT

    https://i.ibb.co/k4cFdkd/Capture-2020-08-24-02-15-17-2.png

    https://mol.im/a/8656465

    Replies: @HammerJack, @Mr. Peabody, @Dan Hayes, @Cloudbuster, @Anon 2, @Ma Laoshi

    , @anon
    @Mr. Anon

    The scammers shall always be with us. But in traditional Western societies they are the exception rather than the rule. And as Muslims, Africans, subcons and other Asians flood into the West, scamming is becoming the rule rather than the exception.

  9. (((Reid J. Epstein)))

    …so don’t believe a word of it.

    • Replies: @ari silver
    @San Fernando Curt

    Good catch! I was suspicious of this part of the bio:Ohio State-educated chemical engineer, who left the work force to home-school her three sons. I think tall tale.

    Replies: @Alden

  10. By Reid J. Epstein

    There’s that name again.

    Epstein.

  11. @Not Only Wrathful
    How has she reached a point in her life where she values the narrative in her head more than real connection?

    Replies: @Ed, @Ed, @bomag, @JimDandy

    I think this Tiabbi tweet is apt:

  12. @Not Only Wrathful
    How has she reached a point in her life where she values the narrative in her head more than real connection?

    Replies: @Ed, @Ed, @bomag, @JimDandy

    I think this Tiabbi tweet is apt:

  13. Sad folks are being led astray to harm their own offspring.

    • Agree: TWS
    • Replies: @Dago Shoes
    @Ed

    Who's leading her? She's making choices to deliberately shape her sons' lives in ways that will likely not be positive … child abuse at the very least … and her own mental illness (look at the statistics on liberal women, 19-35 years old, who admit to having been diagnosed with depression, anxiety disorders and such -- as well as the 'dark triad' profile of these SJW/virtue signaling types.

    Replies: @anon

    , @ben tillman
    @Ed

    Sad, and infuriating.

  14. @Mr. Anon
    OT: This is shaping up to be a real immigrant success story - Surgisphere, the company at the heart of the retracted Lancet study on hydroxychloroquine.

    https://www.medpagetoday.com/special-reports/exclusives/87020

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surgisphere

    Replies: @HammerJack, @anon

    Speaking of immigrants and the NYT

    https://mol.im/a/8656465

    • Replies: @HammerJack
    @HammerJack

    Guh, forgot the money quote:


    "She has no right to wreck our history."
     

    Replies: @Mr. Anon, @Escher

    , @Mr. Peabody
    @HammerJack

    It should be obvious.
    If Melania ain't votin' for Joe, then she ain't a legal immigrant or naturalized citizen.
    C'mon, Man!?

    , @Dan Hayes
    @HammerJack

    Some time ago, Tucker Carlson was stupefied by Eichenwald's literal craziness when being interviewed!

    , @Cloudbuster
    @HammerJack

    So, the left is coming around to our anti-immigration stance?

    , @Anon 2
    @HammerJack

    Eichenwald’s outburst against Melania Trump is in the same category as
    the rage Einstein’s parents felt when they found out that Einstein was
    about to marry a Slavic woman - Mileva Marić

    , @Ma Laoshi
    @HammerJack

    Like all such institutions, the NYT has a habit of forgetting their anti-racism the moment it becomes inconvenient. Trump's faltering coup in Venezuela is of course all about re-empowering the old white comprador elites. But oil is oil, and you need lots of it to run an empire; so the NYT is all for it, as are Lizzy Warren and Bernie Sanders. And for the right price, the Grey Lady was also quite willing to place an article blaming the 737 MAX crashes on inferior negro pilots. Boeing going bankrupt would be a real downer for American dominance, can't have that.

    Much has been written about the "first-world feminism" of Hillary and her ilk, which somehow never manages to notice the widows in Libya and places like that. BLM is another expression of the same blinkered, egotistic impulse.

  15. NYT: Biden-Voting Mom Worries Her 3 White Sons, Ages 8, 5, and 1, Have Too Much White Privilege

    No. That’s not correct.

    Read what she said.

    “It’s hard raising white men in America,” she said of her three boys, ages 8, 5 and 16 months. “You want to understand that they understand their position as an ally.”

    If you read between the lines, here’s what she’s saying.

    -Non-Whites (especially Blacks) are gaining the upper hand in America and ascending to power.
    -Whites (especially White males) are on the losing side of a Civil War.
    -This White mom wants her young White sons to become abandon their losing team (Team White) and join the winning team (Team Non-White).
    -By becoming an “ally” of Team Non-White, her sons can survive and thrive in this new social order. Meanwhile, more traditional Whites will be marginalized, both socially and economically.

    To put it more simply, this mom wants to throw other White people under the bus, in the process enriching herself and her sons. She’s declaring that her family are “Good Whites” who should be given cool jobs and be allowed to live in peace. If the protesters want to harass and beat up anyone, they should target “Bad Whites.”

    This woman isn’t attacking her sons. This woman is attacking YOUR sons.

    The White sled is being pursued by a pack of hungry Black wolves. So this woman is throwing YOUR sons out to be torn to pieces, sparing her own progeny.

    Back during WWII, Nazis conquered France. Some French chose to collaborate, forming the pro-govt Vichy govt. Some French fought back, forming the French Resistance. Those in the Vichy govt were “allies” of Germans, helping them to persecute the French Resistance. In return, French Vichy “allies” were allowed to live their live in peace and prosperity.

    In today’s America, Jews and Blacks are Nazis. White Democrats and White Cuckservative are supporters of the Vichy regime. Trump supporters are the French resistance.

    This mom is declaring she wants her sons to grow up to be supporters of the Vichy regime, as it’s the most pragmatic choice.

    During WWII (2020), a Nazi (Jewish) news columnist wrote an an interesting article in the Das Reich newspaper (New York Times). The Nazi (Jew) favorably portrayed a Vichy collaborationist (woke White Democrat) mother, while spitting vitriol at her stepfather, who’s a supporter of the French Resistance (anti-PC Conservatism).

    • Agree: Cloudbuster
    • Thanks: Julian of Norwich
    • Replies: @Anon
    @JohnnyWalker123

    Interesting analogy, it rings true. I'm going to start using it. I hope the day comes when today's Vichy White Liberals get the same treatment as the old Vichy French.

    , @RichardTaylor
    @JohnnyWalker123


    This woman isn’t attacking her sons. This woman is attacking YOUR sons.

    The White sled is being pursued by a pack of hungry Black wolves. So this woman is throwing YOUR sons out to be torn to pieces, sparing her own progeny.
     
    That's an interesting take and probably some truth to it. For sure, she's willing to sacrifice other Whites to help herself. However, she's taking a position that will turn her descendants non-White in time. Which is hardly looking out for them.
    , @Roderick Spode
    @JohnnyWalker123


    Back during WWII, Nazis conquered France. Some French chose to collaborate, forming the pro-govt Vichy govt. Some French fought back, forming the French Resistance. Those in the Vichy govt were “allies” of Germans, helping them to persecute the French Resistance.
     
    I'm yawning over here. The Vichy government was the real French Resistance, facing off against the real occupying (((power))) for which the "French Resistance" were useful idiots.

    Replies: @Muggles

    , @Lowe
    @JohnnyWalker123

    This is basically true, but the wolves chasing the sled aren't blacks. They are professional middle-class and upper-class whites, with a large number of Jews among them.

    As long as you don't live among them or near them, the black underclass is not a large danger. I doubt this woman lives with that situation.

    What she has in mind is to teach her sons to say the right things, or at least avoid saying the wrong things, so they can get jobs at major corporations. Soon that may be the only way to have a good life, economically.

    , @Rosie
    @JohnnyWalker123


    This woman isn’t attacking her sons. This woman is attacking YOUR sons.

    The White sled is being pursued by a pack of hungry Black wolves. So this woman is throwing YOUR sons out to be torn to pieces, sparing her own progeny.
     
    Ouch! I hadn't thought of it this way, but yes, that may be what is really motivating her deep down.
    , @Ghost of Bull Moose
    @JohnnyWalker123

    This piece describes this virtue-signaling jargon ie 'white privilege' as a status move.

    https://quillette.com/2019/11/16/thorstein-veblens-theory-of-the-leisure-class-a-status-update/

    A really great piece, and if it isn't iSteve material I don't know what is.

    Replies: @Justvisiting

    , @Corvinus
    @JohnnyWalker123

    No, you are projecting your own thoughts onto her and insisting it is her position. Basically, you are speculating. Last time I checked, that doesn’t mean something is objectively true.

    , @Libre
    @JohnnyWalker123

    This isn't about whites vs nonwhites. Nonwhites couldn't carry out any sort of war like this. They'd have their heads blown off. This is a way between whites and whites. One group of whites uses nonwhites to aid in their fight. And do be aware that while Jews are very influential on one side, it is not entirely their fight. This conflict goes back much further than Jews presence.

  16. >He’s a union worker and former Democrat now solidly behind President Trump. She’s a onetime Republican now worried about her sons growing up in the Trump era. Family get-togethers can be difficult.

    This has not been my experience at all with the extended family. Why? Because we’re grounded in reality.

    Look: American politics is like pro sports sponsored by corporations and donors more than anything else these days. 99% of Americans have zero influence-jack, zip, nada-on how this country is governed. People who prioritize an incredibly stupid, and getting stupider, political scene over potential friends, lovers, and family are beyond my comprehension.

    >“You want to understand that they understand their position as an ally.”

    They really don’t understand that most white men are not going to draw the conclusions they desire after having it pounded into their heads that they are White Men, huh?

    • Agree: Escher
  17. @Mr. Anon

    “It’s hard raising white men in America,” she said of her three boys, ages 8, 5 and 16 months. “You want to understand that they understand their position as an ally.”
     
    What a bunch of mush. "understand that they understand...." Can't people even speak clearly anymore? What does this woman even mean by that?

    Replies: @J.Ross, @JohnnyWalker123, @Kolya Krassotkin, @Alec Leamas (hard at work), @Lagertha

    The Uncle Buck nickel speech. I don’t want to know an eight year old who is environmentally or societally responsible.

    • Agree: TWS
    • Replies: @Kolya Krassotkin
    @J.Ross

    An 8 or 9 year old boy who is environmentally and socially conscious is going to grow up to be an interior decorator or Milo Yiannapoulis.

    Replies: @Ben tillman

  18. “It’s hard raising white men in America,”

    Just wait until they are a little older – can’t get into a good school, can’t get a good job, can’t move out of the basement. Then maybe she will finally understand what they understand that it means to have a mom that wanted them, above all else, to be an ally.

    • Agree: Rosie
    • Replies: @HammerJack
    @jon

    She will never understand.

  19. @Mr. Anon

    “It’s hard raising white men in America,” she said of her three boys, ages 8, 5 and 16 months. “You want to understand that they understand their position as an ally.”
     
    What a bunch of mush. "understand that they understand...." Can't people even speak clearly anymore? What does this woman even mean by that?

    Replies: @J.Ross, @JohnnyWalker123, @Kolya Krassotkin, @Alec Leamas (hard at work), @Lagertha

    Watch this 48 second video from “The Simpsons.”

    That video represents exactly what she’s doing.

    She’s just being a bit coy about it.

    See below quote.

    Ladies and gentlemen, uh, we’ve just lost the picture, but what we’ve seen speaks for itself. The Corvair spacecraft has apparently been taken over, ‘conquered’ if you will, by a master race of giant space ants. It’s difficult to tell from this vantage point whether they will consume the captive Earthmen or merely enslave them. One thing is for certain: there is no stopping them; the ants will soon be here. And I, for one, welcome our new insect overlords. I’d like to remind them as a trusted TV personality, I can be helpful in rounding up others to toil in their underground sugar caves.

    At this point, White Gentiles have a choice.

    1. Fight back against their Jewish&Black overlords, risking their job, reputation, finances, and even their physical safety.

    2. Collaborate and become an “ally.” Help the Jewish&Black overlords to crush their White Conservatives enemies. In the process, get rewarded with a good job, status, and a safe life.

    3. Stay silent and see what happens.

    This woman is openly declaring that she’s collaborating with the insects. She will help the insects capture you. Then she (and her sons) will go on to good lives, while you toil in the underground sugar cave.

    “The Simpons” isn’t just a funny cartoon. It actually offers remarkably good insight into human psychology.

    • Agree: BenKenobi, Joseph Doaks
    • Thanks: Cortes
    • Replies: @V. Hickel
    @JohnnyWalker123

    you must be new here

  20. @HammerJack
    @Mr. Anon

    Speaking of immigrants and the NYT

    https://i.ibb.co/k4cFdkd/Capture-2020-08-24-02-15-17-2.png

    https://mol.im/a/8656465

    Replies: @HammerJack, @Mr. Peabody, @Dan Hayes, @Cloudbuster, @Anon 2, @Ma Laoshi

    Guh, forgot the money quote:

    “She has no right to wreck our history.”

    • Replies: @Mr. Anon
    @HammerJack


    “She has no right to wreck our history.”
     
    Yes, that is rich coming from some people.

    Maybe the reconfigured Rose Garden triggered a seizure in Eichenwald.
    , @Escher
    @HammerJack

    Literal wrecking is ok.

  21. Ms. Boorn is white, from Ohio, married to an intelligent, high functioning white man. Somebody really ought to explain to this white lady that the greatest danger to her sons’ well-being is fentanyl/heroin, and it is EVERYWHERE in her social and geographic hood, leave aside EVERYTHING else.

    Based on her demographics, my guestimate is that there is at least a 10% chance that one of her sons will pick up the needle and spoon, and from there there is only one ending. I pray for her and her sons.

    • Replies: @Rosie
    @Daniel H


    Based on her demographics, my guestimate is that there is at least a 10% chance that one of her sons will pick up the needle and spoon, and from there there is only one ending. I pray for her and her sons.
     
    Indeed, and then introduce his brothers to it. Opioids can wipe out whole families.
    , @Cloudbuster
    @Daniel H

    Yes, that fentanyl and heroin just jump out and ambush you. Why, right here in Appalachian Ohio I was walking to the barn the other day when a pack of feral heroin needles ambushed me! Fortunately I was able to drive them off by displaying my icon of the Sainted Michelle Obama.

    Agency is still a thing.

    Time preference, decision-making skills, impulse control and foresight are not evenly distributed, even among the rural White male population.

    , @Achmed E. Newman
    @Daniel H

    A needle and a spoon, and a trip to the moon...

    Sorry, Daniel, this is not any argument or agreement, but your one sentence brought back an old memory of Lynyrd Skynyrd:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_RUs6UBm_AY

    Replies: @bruce county

  22. You probably won’t be surprised to find Columbus has diversity “issues”.

  23. @JohnnyWalker123

    NYT: Biden-Voting Mom Worries Her 3 White Sons, Ages 8, 5, and 1, Have Too Much White Privilege

     

    No. That's not correct.

    Read what she said.

    “It’s hard raising white men in America,” she said of her three boys, ages 8, 5 and 16 months. “You want to understand that they understand their position as an ally.”

     

    If you read between the lines, here's what she's saying.

    -Non-Whites (especially Blacks) are gaining the upper hand in America and ascending to power.
    -Whites (especially White males) are on the losing side of a Civil War.
    -This White mom wants her young White sons to become abandon their losing team (Team White) and join the winning team (Team Non-White).
    -By becoming an "ally" of Team Non-White, her sons can survive and thrive in this new social order. Meanwhile, more traditional Whites will be marginalized, both socially and economically.

    To put it more simply, this mom wants to throw other White people under the bus, in the process enriching herself and her sons. She's declaring that her family are "Good Whites" who should be given cool jobs and be allowed to live in peace. If the protesters want to harass and beat up anyone, they should target "Bad Whites."

    This woman isn't attacking her sons. This woman is attacking YOUR sons.

    The White sled is being pursued by a pack of hungry Black wolves. So this woman is throwing YOUR sons out to be torn to pieces, sparing her own progeny.

    Back during WWII, Nazis conquered France. Some French chose to collaborate, forming the pro-govt Vichy govt. Some French fought back, forming the French Resistance. Those in the Vichy govt were "allies" of Germans, helping them to persecute the French Resistance. In return, French Vichy "allies" were allowed to live their live in peace and prosperity.

    In today's America, Jews and Blacks are Nazis. White Democrats and White Cuckservative are supporters of the Vichy regime. Trump supporters are the French resistance.

    This mom is declaring she wants her sons to grow up to be supporters of the Vichy regime, as it's the most pragmatic choice.

    During WWII (2020), a Nazi (Jewish) news columnist wrote an an interesting article in the Das Reich newspaper (New York Times). The Nazi (Jew) favorably portrayed a Vichy collaborationist (woke White Democrat) mother, while spitting vitriol at her stepfather, who's a supporter of the French Resistance (anti-PC Conservatism).

    Replies: @Anon, @RichardTaylor, @Roderick Spode, @Lowe, @Rosie, @Ghost of Bull Moose, @Corvinus, @Libre

    Interesting analogy, it rings true. I’m going to start using it. I hope the day comes when today’s Vichy White Liberals get the same treatment as the old Vichy French.

  24. @HammerJack
    @HammerJack

    Guh, forgot the money quote:


    "She has no right to wreck our history."
     

    Replies: @Mr. Anon, @Escher

    “She has no right to wreck our history.”

    Yes, that is rich coming from some people.

    Maybe the reconfigured Rose Garden triggered a seizure in Eichenwald.

  25. Anonymous[295] • Disclaimer says:

    The typical female brain is hardwired to comply with ‘dominance’. Surely, most male iStevers can cast their minds back to kindergarten or grade school and remember, even at that tender age, the vast behavioral gulf between girls and boys, and just how much the innate feminine wish to please authority annoyed you.
    The dominant narrative is white racial inferiority, thus females comply with it.
    It appears that this genetically determined unconscious urge to comply with authority and dominance – which doubtless has been honed by millennia of evolutionary behavior – is stronger, in the female at least, than the familial link.

    • Agree: BB753, Abe
    • Replies: @BB753
    @Anonymous

    I agree, and this example is just one more piece of evidence for the argument against women having any participation or say in the political sphere.

    Replies: @throtler

    , @The Germ Theory of Disease
    @Anonymous

    Nope, starts with a J, always does. Do you ever, ever, ever hear a J weeping and bemoaning excessive J privilege? And a guilty mandate to investigate and condemn J privilege? Ever?

    If you poke around these things long enough, this relentless assault on white people, you always mysteriously start to find J after J after J backstage.

    Funny how that works.

    Replies: @HallParvey, @ben tillman, @vinteuil

    , @Libre
    @Anonymous

    Very good point that i should append to my above comment. This isn't even a war between whites and whites. It's a war between white men and white men. We simply need to convert or defeat the other white men, and we will reestablish our dominant position. The rest will fall into place. Women will cleave to us and nonwhites will know their place.

    , @Alden
    @Anonymous

    Another woman hating loser nerd wimp womanless childless clueless useless worthless Woody Allen look alike who’s never been able to dominate a woman, man or child in his loser life.

    I bet Ron never thought his site would be turned into group therapy for men with psycho sexual problems they’re eager to share with the world.

  26. @JohnnyWalker123

    NYT: Biden-Voting Mom Worries Her 3 White Sons, Ages 8, 5, and 1, Have Too Much White Privilege

     

    No. That's not correct.

    Read what she said.

    “It’s hard raising white men in America,” she said of her three boys, ages 8, 5 and 16 months. “You want to understand that they understand their position as an ally.”

     

    If you read between the lines, here's what she's saying.

    -Non-Whites (especially Blacks) are gaining the upper hand in America and ascending to power.
    -Whites (especially White males) are on the losing side of a Civil War.
    -This White mom wants her young White sons to become abandon their losing team (Team White) and join the winning team (Team Non-White).
    -By becoming an "ally" of Team Non-White, her sons can survive and thrive in this new social order. Meanwhile, more traditional Whites will be marginalized, both socially and economically.

    To put it more simply, this mom wants to throw other White people under the bus, in the process enriching herself and her sons. She's declaring that her family are "Good Whites" who should be given cool jobs and be allowed to live in peace. If the protesters want to harass and beat up anyone, they should target "Bad Whites."

    This woman isn't attacking her sons. This woman is attacking YOUR sons.

    The White sled is being pursued by a pack of hungry Black wolves. So this woman is throwing YOUR sons out to be torn to pieces, sparing her own progeny.

    Back during WWII, Nazis conquered France. Some French chose to collaborate, forming the pro-govt Vichy govt. Some French fought back, forming the French Resistance. Those in the Vichy govt were "allies" of Germans, helping them to persecute the French Resistance. In return, French Vichy "allies" were allowed to live their live in peace and prosperity.

    In today's America, Jews and Blacks are Nazis. White Democrats and White Cuckservative are supporters of the Vichy regime. Trump supporters are the French resistance.

    This mom is declaring she wants her sons to grow up to be supporters of the Vichy regime, as it's the most pragmatic choice.

    During WWII (2020), a Nazi (Jewish) news columnist wrote an an interesting article in the Das Reich newspaper (New York Times). The Nazi (Jew) favorably portrayed a Vichy collaborationist (woke White Democrat) mother, while spitting vitriol at her stepfather, who's a supporter of the French Resistance (anti-PC Conservatism).

    Replies: @Anon, @RichardTaylor, @Roderick Spode, @Lowe, @Rosie, @Ghost of Bull Moose, @Corvinus, @Libre

    This woman isn’t attacking her sons. This woman is attacking YOUR sons.

    The White sled is being pursued by a pack of hungry Black wolves. So this woman is throwing YOUR sons out to be torn to pieces, sparing her own progeny.

    That’s an interesting take and probably some truth to it. For sure, she’s willing to sacrifice other Whites to help herself. However, she’s taking a position that will turn her descendants non-White in time. Which is hardly looking out for them.

  27. This woman is convincing evidence that the Nineteenth Amendment may have been a BIG mistake.

    • Agree: Joseph Doaks
    • Replies: @jimbo
    @Herp McDerp

    "May have"?

  28. Last week Ms. Boorn watched most of the virtual Democratic National Convention.

    In laymans’ terms, mind-numbed robot.

    I need more information before deciding whether this is ICD-10 F22.0 or F70 or both.

    • Replies: @jo shmo
    @The Alarmist


    Last week Ms. Boorn watched most of the virtual Democratic National Convention.
     
    This statement makes question whether the whole article.

    The DNC had very very few views. Anyone who watched most of it is a reporter or a dem operative or a freak of nature. So, none of the above is anywhere near the american citizen average.

    Replies: @Justvisiting

  29. @Anonymous
    The typical female brain is hardwired to comply with 'dominance'. Surely, most male iStevers can cast their minds back to kindergarten or grade school and remember, even at that tender age, the vast behavioral gulf between girls and boys, and just how much the innate feminine wish to please authority annoyed you.
    The dominant narrative is white racial inferiority, thus females comply with it.
    It appears that this genetically determined unconscious urge to comply with authority and dominance - which doubtless has been honed by millennia of evolutionary behavior - is stronger, in the female at least, than the familial link.

    Replies: @BB753, @The Germ Theory of Disease, @Libre, @Alden

    I agree, and this example is just one more piece of evidence for the argument against women having any participation or say in the political sphere.

    • Replies: @throtler
    @BB753

    This article is tailor-made for misogynistic outbursts.

    Replies: @BB753, @Rosie, @MBlanc46

  30. The Vandals were just ordinary people, too.

    They had a nasty habit of burning and looting going on, though.

    This level of chicanery is laughable even for “journalists”.

    I doubt this person even exists.

    Rural folks don’t get on well with urbanites, usually.

    The Old Grey Lady is just making things up now.

    The Old Media is DYING as a result of these pathetically unlikely “stories”.

    • Replies: @sayless
    @Dr. Doom

    I doubt whether she really exists too.

    , @HammerJack
    @Dr. Doom

    GoodWhites believe every word of every article in the New York Times. What we see as obvious fabrication they see as disturbing reports from the Front. These are people who believe that the violence in our streets is caused entirely by Proud Boys and Boogaloos.

    Which reminds me. The Vandals got a bad rap. The Visigoths, now, that's another matter entirely.

  31. @Dr. Doom
    The Vandals were just ordinary people, too.

    They had a nasty habit of burning and looting going on, though.

    This level of chicanery is laughable even for "journalists".

    I doubt this person even exists.

    Rural folks don't get on well with urbanites, usually.

    The Old Grey Lady is just making things up now.

    The Old Media is DYING as a result of these pathetically unlikely "stories".

    Replies: @sayless, @HammerJack

    I doubt whether she really exists too.

  32. @Bernard
    The marriage is doomed.

    Replies: @Anonymous, @3g4me, @res, @ScarletNumber

    The marriage is doomed.

    and so are the kids.

    • Replies: @ben tillman
    @Anonymous

    Please, Lord, let him win custody.

    , @ari silver
    @Anonymous

    No husband is mentioned that's a step dad, did I miss it?

  33. @Mr. Anon
    OT: This is shaping up to be a real immigrant success story - Surgisphere, the company at the heart of the retracted Lancet study on hydroxychloroquine.

    https://www.medpagetoday.com/special-reports/exclusives/87020

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surgisphere

    Replies: @HammerJack, @anon

    The scammers shall always be with us. But in traditional Western societies they are the exception rather than the rule. And as Muslims, Africans, subcons and other Asians flood into the West, scamming is becoming the rule rather than the exception.

  34. It is an interesting experiment in child rearing.

    Of course, simple flooding children with positive propaganda does not work on the long run. Most “red diaper babys” lost their faith one time or the other when the promised future didn’t emerge.

    But what’s about flooding children with negative propaganda, instilling feelings of guilt and shame? And pressing them that they can have an escape by joining the correct movement (only the movement needs a scapegoat, so will they really allow them an escape?)

    It will leave a scar. But more?

    • Replies: @Justvisiting
    @Stogumber


    But what’s about flooding children with negative propaganda, instilling feelings of guilt and shame?
     
    My prediction:

    One of the kids will end up as a suicide statistic.

    Another one will rebel and become a white nationalist.

    The third will "go along to get along" and muddle through whatever faces them without ideology.

    Replies: @Rahan

  35. @JohnnyWalker123

    NYT: Biden-Voting Mom Worries Her 3 White Sons, Ages 8, 5, and 1, Have Too Much White Privilege

     

    No. That's not correct.

    Read what she said.

    “It’s hard raising white men in America,” she said of her three boys, ages 8, 5 and 16 months. “You want to understand that they understand their position as an ally.”

     

    If you read between the lines, here's what she's saying.

    -Non-Whites (especially Blacks) are gaining the upper hand in America and ascending to power.
    -Whites (especially White males) are on the losing side of a Civil War.
    -This White mom wants her young White sons to become abandon their losing team (Team White) and join the winning team (Team Non-White).
    -By becoming an "ally" of Team Non-White, her sons can survive and thrive in this new social order. Meanwhile, more traditional Whites will be marginalized, both socially and economically.

    To put it more simply, this mom wants to throw other White people under the bus, in the process enriching herself and her sons. She's declaring that her family are "Good Whites" who should be given cool jobs and be allowed to live in peace. If the protesters want to harass and beat up anyone, they should target "Bad Whites."

    This woman isn't attacking her sons. This woman is attacking YOUR sons.

    The White sled is being pursued by a pack of hungry Black wolves. So this woman is throwing YOUR sons out to be torn to pieces, sparing her own progeny.

    Back during WWII, Nazis conquered France. Some French chose to collaborate, forming the pro-govt Vichy govt. Some French fought back, forming the French Resistance. Those in the Vichy govt were "allies" of Germans, helping them to persecute the French Resistance. In return, French Vichy "allies" were allowed to live their live in peace and prosperity.

    In today's America, Jews and Blacks are Nazis. White Democrats and White Cuckservative are supporters of the Vichy regime. Trump supporters are the French resistance.

    This mom is declaring she wants her sons to grow up to be supporters of the Vichy regime, as it's the most pragmatic choice.

    During WWII (2020), a Nazi (Jewish) news columnist wrote an an interesting article in the Das Reich newspaper (New York Times). The Nazi (Jew) favorably portrayed a Vichy collaborationist (woke White Democrat) mother, while spitting vitriol at her stepfather, who's a supporter of the French Resistance (anti-PC Conservatism).

    Replies: @Anon, @RichardTaylor, @Roderick Spode, @Lowe, @Rosie, @Ghost of Bull Moose, @Corvinus, @Libre

    Back during WWII, Nazis conquered France. Some French chose to collaborate, forming the pro-govt Vichy govt. Some French fought back, forming the French Resistance. Those in the Vichy govt were “allies” of Germans, helping them to persecute the French Resistance.

    I’m yawning over here. The Vichy government was the real French Resistance, facing off against the real occupying (((power))) for which the “French Resistance” were useful idiots.

    • Agree: BB753, Thoughts
    • Replies: @Muggles
    @Roderick Spode

    >>I’m yawning over here. The Vichy government was the real French Resistance, facing off against the real occupying (((power))) for which the “French Resistance” were useful idiots.<<

    Normally I don't do ad hominem replies here. But this is sick.

    No one in France, other than a handful of jihadi "refugees," would agree with you.

    That Hitler worship disease you have is classic Stage 4 dementia.

    Likewise for your "fans" here.

    Replies: @Roderick Spode, @BB753

  36. @Neo-Socratic
    I bet she's on social media telling everybody about it which is what it's really about.

    Replies: @OscarWildeLoveChild

    100 percent.

  37. @Anonymous
    The typical female brain is hardwired to comply with 'dominance'. Surely, most male iStevers can cast their minds back to kindergarten or grade school and remember, even at that tender age, the vast behavioral gulf between girls and boys, and just how much the innate feminine wish to please authority annoyed you.
    The dominant narrative is white racial inferiority, thus females comply with it.
    It appears that this genetically determined unconscious urge to comply with authority and dominance - which doubtless has been honed by millennia of evolutionary behavior - is stronger, in the female at least, than the familial link.

    Replies: @BB753, @The Germ Theory of Disease, @Libre, @Alden

    Nope, starts with a J, always does. Do you ever, ever, ever hear a J weeping and bemoaning excessive J privilege? And a guilty mandate to investigate and condemn J privilege? Ever?

    If you poke around these things long enough, this relentless assault on white people, you always mysteriously start to find J after J after J backstage.

    Funny how that works.

    • Agree: Pop Warner
    • Replies: @HallParvey
    @The Germ Theory of Disease


    Nope, starts with a J, always does.

     

    Jesus?

    Replies: @SaneClownPosse

    , @ben tillman
    @The Germ Theory of Disease


    Nope, starts with a J, always does. Do you ever, ever, ever hear a J weeping and bemoaning excessive J privilege? And a guilty mandate to investigate and condemn J privilege? Ever?
     
    No. Good point.

    Replies: @Ghost of Bull Moose

    , @vinteuil
    @The Germ Theory of Disease


    Do you ever, ever, ever hear a J weeping and bemoaning excessive J privilege?
     
    No.

    Good on them.

    Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease

  38. @Not Only Wrathful
    How has she reached a point in her life where she values the narrative in her head more than real connection?

    Replies: @Ed, @Ed, @bomag, @JimDandy

    1) Reveals the power of coordinated propaganda and group think that starts in kindergarten and is reinforced by media and work rules etc.

    2) Some people get a thrill and are prone to hating on family members and those close to them.

  39. @BB753
    @Anonymous

    I agree, and this example is just one more piece of evidence for the argument against women having any participation or say in the political sphere.

    Replies: @throtler

    This article is tailor-made for misogynistic outbursts.

    • LOL: BB753
    • Replies: @BB753
    @throtler

    Thanks for the laugh! I'm not a mysoginist, I just believe women belong home raising the children and doing housekeeping. Is there a higher calling than that?

    https://youtu.be/J7X1TwsaIN8

    Replies: @Steve in Greensboro

    , @Rosie
    @throtler


    This article is tailor-made for misogynistic outbursts.
     
    Female treachery justifies disenfranchisement of women, while male treachery, however momentous in its consequences, has no public policy implications whatsoever.

    Misogynists used to attempt to justify their desire for a reactionary crackdown on women by resort to our voting behavior. Since 2016, that argument is no longer tenable. Now, they just rely on things random women say to the prestige press and claim these women represent the whole of White womanhood. It's pathetic, really.

    Replies: @Pop Warner, @throtler, @Wyatt

    , @MBlanc46
    @throtler

    One person’s misogyny is another person’s truth-telling.

    Replies: @Rosie

  40. This woman makes me sick. How can her husband and children put up with her?

    • Replies: @BB753
    @throtler

    The poor children are too young to know better and the husband is either cucked or terrorised by the idea of divorce. Romance leads to marriage, and marriage with kids becomes perpetual servitude and humiliation for men under existing laws.

    Replies: @Jim Don Bob

    , @Alexander Turok
    @throtler

    As does her father. Rotten apple didn't fall far from the tree.

    https://www.unz.com/akarlin/wearing-masks-as-iq-personality-test

  41. Die SJW Frauen sind unser Unglück.

  42. Say what you want, if she exists she’s certainly producing White kids. More than most here can say…

    The great advantage of wokeness is that it centers Whites. That’s why the Irish like it so much. Talking about yourself as being the victim of colonialism and class bigotry is profoundly humiliating. Talking about yourself as the most powerful force in world history, by virtue of skin color, feels good. You’re the centre of the world. You are finally able to look the more advanced Whites in the eye and feel a sense of unity with them.

    • Replies: @Alexander Turok
    @Jesse

    There's a common failure mode where smart people assume someone with kids made an intentional decision to have them. Might just be that she's just bad at using protection.

  43. @Mr. Anon

    “It’s hard raising white men in America,” she said of her three boys, ages 8, 5 and 16 months. “You want to understand that they understand their position as an ally.”
     
    What a bunch of mush. "understand that they understand...." Can't people even speak clearly anymore? What does this woman even mean by that?

    Replies: @J.Ross, @JohnnyWalker123, @Kolya Krassotkin, @Alec Leamas (hard at work), @Lagertha

    Anyone who worries about the politics of her 8, 5 and 6 month old son has plenty of screws loose.

    But note that Ms. Boorn is the left-wing step daughter of a conservative dad, so she’s not from his gene pool, and how ironic that it’s probanly his conservative principles that made him a man sufficiently of the stand-up sort to nurture her as a child.

  44. @J.Ross
    @Mr. Anon

    The Uncle Buck nickel speech. I don't want to know an eight year old who is environmentally or societally responsible.

    Replies: @Kolya Krassotkin

    An 8 or 9 year old boy who is environmentally and socially conscious is going to grow up to be an interior decorator or Milo Yiannapoulis.

    • Agree: J.Ross
    • Replies: @Ben tillman
    @Kolya Krassotkin

    Or me.

  45. @JohnnyWalker123
    @Mr. Anon

    Watch this 48 second video from "The Simpsons."

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8lcUHQYhPTE

    That video represents exactly what she's doing.

    She's just being a bit coy about it.

    See below quote.


    Ladies and gentlemen, uh, we've just lost the picture, but what we've seen speaks for itself. The Corvair spacecraft has apparently been taken over, 'conquered' if you will, by a master race of giant space ants. It's difficult to tell from this vantage point whether they will consume the captive Earthmen or merely enslave them. One thing is for certain: there is no stopping them; the ants will soon be here. And I, for one, welcome our new insect overlords. I'd like to remind them as a trusted TV personality, I can be helpful in rounding up others to toil in their underground sugar caves.

     

    At this point, White Gentiles have a choice.

    1. Fight back against their Jewish&Black overlords, risking their job, reputation, finances, and even their physical safety.

    2. Collaborate and become an "ally." Help the Jewish&Black overlords to crush their White Conservatives enemies. In the process, get rewarded with a good job, status, and a safe life.

    3. Stay silent and see what happens.

    This woman is openly declaring that she's collaborating with the insects. She will help the insects capture you. Then she (and her sons) will go on to good lives, while you toil in the underground sugar cave.

    "The Simpons" isn't just a funny cartoon. It actually offers remarkably good insight into human psychology.

    Replies: @V. Hickel

    you must be new here

  46. @throtler
    @BB753

    This article is tailor-made for misogynistic outbursts.

    Replies: @BB753, @Rosie, @MBlanc46

    Thanks for the laugh! I’m not a mysoginist, I just believe women belong home raising the children and doing housekeeping. Is there a higher calling than that?

    • Replies: @Steve in Greensboro
    @BB753

    You believe that women belong home raising children. I believe that also. And it happens to be the truth.

    Feminism is for fat, ugly women who don't bathe.

    Replies: @BB753

  47. @HammerJack
    @Mr. Anon

    Speaking of immigrants and the NYT

    https://i.ibb.co/k4cFdkd/Capture-2020-08-24-02-15-17-2.png

    https://mol.im/a/8656465

    Replies: @HammerJack, @Mr. Peabody, @Dan Hayes, @Cloudbuster, @Anon 2, @Ma Laoshi

    It should be obvious.
    If Melania ain’t votin’ for Joe, then she ain’t a legal immigrant or naturalized citizen.
    C’mon, Man!?

    • LOL: Muggles
  48. @throtler
    This woman makes me sick. How can her husband and children put up with her?

    Replies: @BB753, @Alexander Turok

    The poor children are too young to know better and the husband is either cucked or terrorised by the idea of divorce. Romance leads to marriage, and marriage with kids becomes perpetual servitude and humiliation for men under existing laws.

    • Replies: @Jim Don Bob
    @BB753

    I wonder how many couples he had to interview before he found this ditz woman and her whipped husband. He, like so many other "journalists", already had the story written. He just needed some bolstering quotes from real people in flyover country.

    Replies: @Ghost of Bull Moose, @Alden

  49. @throtler
    This woman makes me sick. How can her husband and children put up with her?

    Replies: @BB753, @Alexander Turok

    As does her father. Rotten apple didn’t fall far from the tree.

    https://www.unz.com/akarlin/wearing-masks-as-iq-personality-test

  50. @JohnnyWalker123

    NYT: Biden-Voting Mom Worries Her 3 White Sons, Ages 8, 5, and 1, Have Too Much White Privilege

     

    No. That's not correct.

    Read what she said.

    “It’s hard raising white men in America,” she said of her three boys, ages 8, 5 and 16 months. “You want to understand that they understand their position as an ally.”

     

    If you read between the lines, here's what she's saying.

    -Non-Whites (especially Blacks) are gaining the upper hand in America and ascending to power.
    -Whites (especially White males) are on the losing side of a Civil War.
    -This White mom wants her young White sons to become abandon their losing team (Team White) and join the winning team (Team Non-White).
    -By becoming an "ally" of Team Non-White, her sons can survive and thrive in this new social order. Meanwhile, more traditional Whites will be marginalized, both socially and economically.

    To put it more simply, this mom wants to throw other White people under the bus, in the process enriching herself and her sons. She's declaring that her family are "Good Whites" who should be given cool jobs and be allowed to live in peace. If the protesters want to harass and beat up anyone, they should target "Bad Whites."

    This woman isn't attacking her sons. This woman is attacking YOUR sons.

    The White sled is being pursued by a pack of hungry Black wolves. So this woman is throwing YOUR sons out to be torn to pieces, sparing her own progeny.

    Back during WWII, Nazis conquered France. Some French chose to collaborate, forming the pro-govt Vichy govt. Some French fought back, forming the French Resistance. Those in the Vichy govt were "allies" of Germans, helping them to persecute the French Resistance. In return, French Vichy "allies" were allowed to live their live in peace and prosperity.

    In today's America, Jews and Blacks are Nazis. White Democrats and White Cuckservative are supporters of the Vichy regime. Trump supporters are the French resistance.

    This mom is declaring she wants her sons to grow up to be supporters of the Vichy regime, as it's the most pragmatic choice.

    During WWII (2020), a Nazi (Jewish) news columnist wrote an an interesting article in the Das Reich newspaper (New York Times). The Nazi (Jew) favorably portrayed a Vichy collaborationist (woke White Democrat) mother, while spitting vitriol at her stepfather, who's a supporter of the French Resistance (anti-PC Conservatism).

    Replies: @Anon, @RichardTaylor, @Roderick Spode, @Lowe, @Rosie, @Ghost of Bull Moose, @Corvinus, @Libre

    This is basically true, but the wolves chasing the sled aren’t blacks. They are professional middle-class and upper-class whites, with a large number of Jews among them.

    As long as you don’t live among them or near them, the black underclass is not a large danger. I doubt this woman lives with that situation.

    What she has in mind is to teach her sons to say the right things, or at least avoid saying the wrong things, so they can get jobs at major corporations. Soon that may be the only way to have a good life, economically.

  51. @The Germ Theory of Disease
    @Anonymous

    Nope, starts with a J, always does. Do you ever, ever, ever hear a J weeping and bemoaning excessive J privilege? And a guilty mandate to investigate and condemn J privilege? Ever?

    If you poke around these things long enough, this relentless assault on white people, you always mysteriously start to find J after J after J backstage.

    Funny how that works.

    Replies: @HallParvey, @ben tillman, @vinteuil

    Nope, starts with a J, always does.

    Jesus?

    • Replies: @SaneClownPosse
    @HallParvey

    Jesus was a Jew. So, yes.

  52. There is a story told of Mohatmas Ghandi.
    Supposedly a Hindu came to him and said he would go to hell.
    Why asks Ghandi.
    Because I killed a Moslem.
    Ghandi says he can be forgiven. Just adopt a child and raise him as a Moslem.
    Using Ghandi’s thinking, I have an idea for this woman: she should have her three children adopted by Negroes. Preferably illiterate single mothers.

  53. @Jesse
    Say what you want, if she exists she's certainly producing White kids. More than most here can say...

    The great advantage of wokeness is that it centers Whites. That's why the Irish like it so much. Talking about yourself as being the victim of colonialism and class bigotry is profoundly humiliating. Talking about yourself as the most powerful force in world history, by virtue of skin color, feels good. You're the centre of the world. You are finally able to look the more advanced Whites in the eye and feel a sense of unity with them.

    Replies: @Alexander Turok

    There’s a common failure mode where smart people assume someone with kids made an intentional decision to have them. Might just be that she’s just bad at using protection.

  54. @jon

    “It’s hard raising white men in America,”
     
    Just wait until they are a little older - can't get into a good school, can't get a good job, can't move out of the basement. Then maybe she will finally understand what they understand that it means to have a mom that wanted them, above all else, to be an ally.

    Replies: @HammerJack

    She will never understand.

  55. Just saw a tweet by Rob Reiner. He says the Original Sin of America was SLAVERY.

    Sin? What does that word mean in their heathen tongue, one wonders?

    Ending slavery is probably the problem here though.

    There were many making many shekels on that trade.

    Marxism is slavery, but that’s said to be good.

    Who/whom? Its all in the point of view.

    You can choose to feel guilty about ending slavery and fake “sins”.

    But haven’t you better things to do?

    • Replies: @Jim Don Bob
    @Dr. Doom

    Rob Reiner was obviously perfectly cast as Meathead on the Archie Bunker show.

  56. @Dr. Doom
    The Vandals were just ordinary people, too.

    They had a nasty habit of burning and looting going on, though.

    This level of chicanery is laughable even for "journalists".

    I doubt this person even exists.

    Rural folks don't get on well with urbanites, usually.

    The Old Grey Lady is just making things up now.

    The Old Media is DYING as a result of these pathetically unlikely "stories".

    Replies: @sayless, @HammerJack

    GoodWhites believe every word of every article in the New York Times. What we see as obvious fabrication they see as disturbing reports from the Front. These are people who believe that the violence in our streets is caused entirely by Proud Boys and Boogaloos.

    Which reminds me. The Vandals got a bad rap. The Visigoths, now, that’s another matter entirely.

  57. Gallup Poll: Democrats’ party affiliation lead shrinks 5 points since June

    https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/513339-democrats-party-affiliation-lead-shrinks-5-points-since-june-gallup

    What could possibly be going on here?

  58. @Herp McDerp
    This woman is convincing evidence that the Nineteenth Amendment may have been a BIG mistake.

    Replies: @jimbo

    “May have”?

  59. “It’s hard raising white men in America,” she said of her three boys, ages 8, 5 and 16 months. “You want to understand that they understand their position as an ally.”

    IF this story is true, and IF this woman is truly following her suicidal bent, then I predict that – far from producing three little ‘non-white allies’ – this woman is unintentionally producing (if they live to witness adulthood), three very open-eyed survivors of forced inclusion and integration.

    Once they realize what she had done to them, these sons will not be kind to their mother in the future.

  60. @HammerJack
    @Mr. Anon

    Speaking of immigrants and the NYT

    https://i.ibb.co/k4cFdkd/Capture-2020-08-24-02-15-17-2.png

    https://mol.im/a/8656465

    Replies: @HammerJack, @Mr. Peabody, @Dan Hayes, @Cloudbuster, @Anon 2, @Ma Laoshi

    Some time ago, Tucker Carlson was stupefied by Eichenwald’s literal craziness when being interviewed!

  61. 4x out of 5, mothers have little or no influence on their children’s understanding of politics or religion. That’s true of daughters and even more true of sons. The salient question here is what her husband thinks (the significance of which will be modified by the degree to which he and his sons are alienated from each other as they grow older, which they may be due to common-and-garden domestic friction). You don’t get your politics or your religion from your mother, you get your manners from your mother (unless, of course, you despise your mother).

  62. @Stogumber
    It is an interesting experiment in child rearing.

    Of course, simple flooding children with positive propaganda does not work on the long run. Most "red diaper babys" lost their faith one time or the other when the promised future didn't emerge.

    But what's about flooding children with negative propaganda, instilling feelings of guilt and shame? And pressing them that they can have an escape by joining the correct movement (only the movement needs a scapegoat, so will they really allow them an escape?)

    It will leave a scar. But more?

    Replies: @Justvisiting

    But what’s about flooding children with negative propaganda, instilling feelings of guilt and shame?

    My prediction:

    One of the kids will end up as a suicide statistic.

    Another one will rebel and become a white nationalist.

    The third will “go along to get along” and muddle through whatever faces them without ideology.

    • Replies: @Rahan
    @Justvisiting


    One of the kids will end up as a suicide statistic.
     
    But will he first be pumped with estrogen and castrated, before joining the 41%, or will it be a more generic "I can't stand this shit without regular doses of fentanyl" thing?
  63. “My husband and I both grew up in northeast Ohio and it’s rural…There are people who are openly racist. Coming down to Columbus, we made friends with people of all colors and all religions and it’s so hard to tell people who don’t see that these are just people…”

    This sounds like a speech I heard a hundred times while attending church as a kid. She sounds like a convert to a new religion, telling all the congregants in her new faith how bad the people in her old life were, or how misguided the people in her former faith were. You’re supposed to confess *your sins* but far more often they end confessing the “sins” of everyone else.

    Some of those people in their speeches even acknowledge abandoning and disowning their “wicked” family members, who have not yet seen the light of the new faith – just the way so many SJWs insult or even abandon their own family members who vote Republican.

    The more and more I see what’s happening the more I realize that “social justice” is indeed our new official state religion. Only it doesn’t call itself a religion, so none of us are allowed to exempt ourselves on First Amendment grounds.

    • Replies: @Art Deco
    @Wilkey

    I've forgotten who it was who said liberals are commonly people who fancy they're better than the people they grew up around.

    Replies: @Ben tillman

    , @black sea
    @Wilkey


    This sounds like a speech I heard a hundred times while attending church as a kid.
     
    Years ago, some friends of mine were featured in a NYT story about affordable apartments in Jackson Heights. I congratulated them on their moment of fame, and though the article had nothing particularly political or controversial about it, they told me that they were taken aback at the journalistic liberties regarding the invention of quotations they had never uttered in the actual interview.

    This wasn't just some editing and tidying; it was stuff made up from whole cloth. I guess the writer figured they would be flattered to see their names in print and wouldn't make an issue of it, which they didn't.

    I wouldn't say they were angry exactly, but they were definitely surprised.

  64. OT, here’s an interesting intersectional iSteve-bait story about a Haim Saban-like billionaire – Isaac Larian – who made the Bratz dolls (slutty barbie dolls) and his fight against a black woman who he calls “a disgrace to Black people and the BLM cause”. Quite how he is an appointed leader of the BLM cause is unstated.

    https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/stephaniemcneal/lol-surprise-black-influencer-amina-mucciolo-isaac-larian

  65. @JohnnyWalker123

    NYT: Biden-Voting Mom Worries Her 3 White Sons, Ages 8, 5, and 1, Have Too Much White Privilege

     

    No. That's not correct.

    Read what she said.

    “It’s hard raising white men in America,” she said of her three boys, ages 8, 5 and 16 months. “You want to understand that they understand their position as an ally.”

     

    If you read between the lines, here's what she's saying.

    -Non-Whites (especially Blacks) are gaining the upper hand in America and ascending to power.
    -Whites (especially White males) are on the losing side of a Civil War.
    -This White mom wants her young White sons to become abandon their losing team (Team White) and join the winning team (Team Non-White).
    -By becoming an "ally" of Team Non-White, her sons can survive and thrive in this new social order. Meanwhile, more traditional Whites will be marginalized, both socially and economically.

    To put it more simply, this mom wants to throw other White people under the bus, in the process enriching herself and her sons. She's declaring that her family are "Good Whites" who should be given cool jobs and be allowed to live in peace. If the protesters want to harass and beat up anyone, they should target "Bad Whites."

    This woman isn't attacking her sons. This woman is attacking YOUR sons.

    The White sled is being pursued by a pack of hungry Black wolves. So this woman is throwing YOUR sons out to be torn to pieces, sparing her own progeny.

    Back during WWII, Nazis conquered France. Some French chose to collaborate, forming the pro-govt Vichy govt. Some French fought back, forming the French Resistance. Those in the Vichy govt were "allies" of Germans, helping them to persecute the French Resistance. In return, French Vichy "allies" were allowed to live their live in peace and prosperity.

    In today's America, Jews and Blacks are Nazis. White Democrats and White Cuckservative are supporters of the Vichy regime. Trump supporters are the French resistance.

    This mom is declaring she wants her sons to grow up to be supporters of the Vichy regime, as it's the most pragmatic choice.

    During WWII (2020), a Nazi (Jewish) news columnist wrote an an interesting article in the Das Reich newspaper (New York Times). The Nazi (Jew) favorably portrayed a Vichy collaborationist (woke White Democrat) mother, while spitting vitriol at her stepfather, who's a supporter of the French Resistance (anti-PC Conservatism).

    Replies: @Anon, @RichardTaylor, @Roderick Spode, @Lowe, @Rosie, @Ghost of Bull Moose, @Corvinus, @Libre

    This woman isn’t attacking her sons. This woman is attacking YOUR sons.

    The White sled is being pursued by a pack of hungry Black wolves. So this woman is throwing YOUR sons out to be torn to pieces, sparing her own progeny.

    Ouch! I hadn’t thought of it this way, but yes, that may be what is really motivating her deep down.

  66. @Daniel H
    Ms. Boorn is white, from Ohio, married to an intelligent, high functioning white man. Somebody really ought to explain to this white lady that the greatest danger to her sons' well-being is fentanyl/heroin, and it is EVERYWHERE in her social and geographic hood, leave aside EVERYTHING else.

    Based on her demographics, my guestimate is that there is at least a 10% chance that one of her sons will pick up the needle and spoon, and from there there is only one ending. I pray for her and her sons.

    Replies: @Rosie, @Cloudbuster, @Achmed E. Newman

    Based on her demographics, my guestimate is that there is at least a 10% chance that one of her sons will pick up the needle and spoon, and from there there is only one ending. I pray for her and her sons.

    Indeed, and then introduce his brothers to it. Opioids can wipe out whole families.

  67. @HammerJack
    @Mr. Anon

    Speaking of immigrants and the NYT

    https://i.ibb.co/k4cFdkd/Capture-2020-08-24-02-15-17-2.png

    https://mol.im/a/8656465

    Replies: @HammerJack, @Mr. Peabody, @Dan Hayes, @Cloudbuster, @Anon 2, @Ma Laoshi

    So, the left is coming around to our anti-immigration stance?

  68. @throtler
    @BB753

    This article is tailor-made for misogynistic outbursts.

    Replies: @BB753, @Rosie, @MBlanc46

    This article is tailor-made for misogynistic outbursts.

    Female treachery justifies disenfranchisement of women, while male treachery, however momentous in its consequences, has no public policy implications whatsoever.

    Misogynists used to attempt to justify their desire for a reactionary crackdown on women by resort to our voting behavior. Since 2016, that argument is no longer tenable. Now, they just rely on things random women say to the prestige press and claim these women represent the whole of White womanhood. It’s pathetic, really.

    • Agree: throtler
    • Replies: @Pop Warner
    @Rosie

    You're wrong. I don't want men to vote either.

    Our current state is the end result of the liberal democracy experiment that founded this republic. Liberals are nothing more than proto-bolsheviks, and it's no surprise that the egalitarian mindset pushed by the Enlightenment finds its logical conclusion in communism with its absurd and unrealistic focus on "equality." Centuries from now the concept of every adult having the vote will be seen as a curiosity from a bygone era where men went mad

    Replies: @Rosie, @BB753

    , @throtler
    @Rosie

    I totally agree with you.

    , @Wyatt
    @Rosie

    That's not what he said. When you look back at the history of leftist movements in the United States, you will see blacks, jews and women. When you look at the modern Democratic Party in the US complaining about whites and the west, you see blacks, jews and women. Those three groups are principally responsible for the social and political agitation that has rotted America. In the case of blacks and women, it's easy to get them to buy into oppression narratives because it makes them feel good about themselves to believe something without actually having done anything.

    Haven't you noticed all the box wine bitches who think their Twitter activism counts for anything? What about all the screechy cunts who put themselves front and center during the riots? Women are actually part of the reason that reactionary conservative is so strong. When someone like Charlie Kirk or Ben Shapiro "destroys a liberal with facts and logic" the most pitiful of liberals are the women. The guys will come up and either be raging dicks or sometimes be sensible, but the women are always mousy, they never address statistics and always rely on their feelings to guide their opinions. And yet, despite this lacking sense of reality, they will always be the most narcissistic and condescending. They are the ones who motivate people to hate the left because they're so far removed from reality.

    And that's the one good thing about the left being so thoroughly entrenched with women because women moving into anything inevitably decays the environment.

    This happened in the military with reduced physical standards and handholding for recruits.
    This happened in gaming when the feminists decided to peddle their grift.
    This happened in Occupy Wall Street when gender bullshit entered the fray.
    This happened in Congress with bitches like Mazie Hirono telling men to sit down and shut up.
    This happened in academia as female social science professors started popping up like cancer polyps and infecting kids.
    This happens with feminists who try to make all female companies and watch all their work be burned to the ground by catfighting. Coincidentally, this also happens with blacks who try to uplift the ghettos. Once shot at, twice shy. Speaking of, can I interest you in this aptly named song?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woman_Is_the_Nigger_of_the_World

    Whines about white men? Check.
    Complains endlessly about oppression? Check.
    Wants government handouts? Check.
    Wants to do the hard, dirty jobs nobody else wants? Shiiiiiiieeeeeeet

    Seriously, where can you point to that women have made a tremendous benefit through their inclusion? I can point to a hundred where their inclusion caused a decline. Also, if women didn't vote in the 2016 election, Trump would have won still. Hell, he would have won by greater margins.

    Replies: @Rosie, @Reg Cæsar, @Rosie

  69. @Ed
    Sad folks are being led astray to harm their own offspring.

    Replies: @Dago Shoes, @ben tillman

    Who’s leading her? She’s making choices to deliberately shape her sons’ lives in ways that will likely not be positive … child abuse at the very least … and her own mental illness (look at the statistics on liberal women, 19-35 years old, who admit to having been diagnosed with depression, anxiety disorders and such — as well as the ‘dark triad’ profile of these SJW/virtue signaling types.

    • Replies: @anon
    @Dago Shoes

    Who’s leading her?

    All of her friends on Fakebook, Twatter and/or Instant-gram, of course.
    Social media is like opiods to most women: numbing and addictive.

    Replies: @The Wild Geese Howard

  70. @Wilkey

    “My husband and I both grew up in northeast Ohio and it’s rural...There are people who are openly racist. Coming down to Columbus, we made friends with people of all colors and all religions and it’s so hard to tell people who don’t see that these are just people...”
     
    This sounds like a speech I heard a hundred times while attending church as a kid. She sounds like a convert to a new religion, telling all the congregants in her new faith how bad the people in her old life were, or how misguided the people in her former faith were. You’re supposed to confess *your sins* but far more often they end confessing the “sins” of everyone else.

    Some of those people in their speeches even acknowledge abandoning and disowning their “wicked” family members, who have not yet seen the light of the new faith - just the way so many SJWs insult or even abandon their own family members who vote Republican.

    The more and more I see what’s happening the more I realize that “social justice” is indeed our new official state religion. Only it doesn’t call itself a religion, so none of us are allowed to exempt ourselves on First Amendment grounds.

    Replies: @Art Deco, @black sea

    I’ve forgotten who it was who said liberals are commonly people who fancy they’re better than the people they grew up around.

    • Replies: @Ben tillman
    @Art Deco

    It’s especially applicable to liberals who grew up in the South.

  71. @Daniel H
    Ms. Boorn is white, from Ohio, married to an intelligent, high functioning white man. Somebody really ought to explain to this white lady that the greatest danger to her sons' well-being is fentanyl/heroin, and it is EVERYWHERE in her social and geographic hood, leave aside EVERYTHING else.

    Based on her demographics, my guestimate is that there is at least a 10% chance that one of her sons will pick up the needle and spoon, and from there there is only one ending. I pray for her and her sons.

    Replies: @Rosie, @Cloudbuster, @Achmed E. Newman

    Yes, that fentanyl and heroin just jump out and ambush you. Why, right here in Appalachian Ohio I was walking to the barn the other day when a pack of feral heroin needles ambushed me! Fortunately I was able to drive them off by displaying my icon of the Sainted Michelle Obama.

    Agency is still a thing.

    Time preference, decision-making skills, impulse control and foresight are not evenly distributed, even among the rural White male population.

  72. What a fucking psycho. Imagine hating your own children because some media jew told you they have original sin. She has a 15 month old and she’s crying about climate change and muh ebil white police, her priorities and her maternal instincts are completely misplaced.

    I pray for those boys and their father, they share a roof (and blood) with an evil woman. I just hope the father’s will is stronger and he teaches them not to hate themselves, but a lot of trumpists buy into oppression myths and walk a tightrope by being “colorblind,” confirming that they’re nothing more than 90s/00s democrats. I hope this father isn’t one of them

  73. @Anonymous
    @Bernard


    The marriage is doomed.
     
    and so are the kids.

    Replies: @ben tillman, @ari silver

    Please, Lord, let him win custody.

    • Agree: YetAnotherAnon
  74. @Ed
    Sad folks are being led astray to harm their own offspring.

    Replies: @Dago Shoes, @ben tillman

    Sad, and infuriating.

  75. @JohnnyWalker123

    NYT: Biden-Voting Mom Worries Her 3 White Sons, Ages 8, 5, and 1, Have Too Much White Privilege

     

    No. That's not correct.

    Read what she said.

    “It’s hard raising white men in America,” she said of her three boys, ages 8, 5 and 16 months. “You want to understand that they understand their position as an ally.”

     

    If you read between the lines, here's what she's saying.

    -Non-Whites (especially Blacks) are gaining the upper hand in America and ascending to power.
    -Whites (especially White males) are on the losing side of a Civil War.
    -This White mom wants her young White sons to become abandon their losing team (Team White) and join the winning team (Team Non-White).
    -By becoming an "ally" of Team Non-White, her sons can survive and thrive in this new social order. Meanwhile, more traditional Whites will be marginalized, both socially and economically.

    To put it more simply, this mom wants to throw other White people under the bus, in the process enriching herself and her sons. She's declaring that her family are "Good Whites" who should be given cool jobs and be allowed to live in peace. If the protesters want to harass and beat up anyone, they should target "Bad Whites."

    This woman isn't attacking her sons. This woman is attacking YOUR sons.

    The White sled is being pursued by a pack of hungry Black wolves. So this woman is throwing YOUR sons out to be torn to pieces, sparing her own progeny.

    Back during WWII, Nazis conquered France. Some French chose to collaborate, forming the pro-govt Vichy govt. Some French fought back, forming the French Resistance. Those in the Vichy govt were "allies" of Germans, helping them to persecute the French Resistance. In return, French Vichy "allies" were allowed to live their live in peace and prosperity.

    In today's America, Jews and Blacks are Nazis. White Democrats and White Cuckservative are supporters of the Vichy regime. Trump supporters are the French resistance.

    This mom is declaring she wants her sons to grow up to be supporters of the Vichy regime, as it's the most pragmatic choice.

    During WWII (2020), a Nazi (Jewish) news columnist wrote an an interesting article in the Das Reich newspaper (New York Times). The Nazi (Jew) favorably portrayed a Vichy collaborationist (woke White Democrat) mother, while spitting vitriol at her stepfather, who's a supporter of the French Resistance (anti-PC Conservatism).

    Replies: @Anon, @RichardTaylor, @Roderick Spode, @Lowe, @Rosie, @Ghost of Bull Moose, @Corvinus, @Libre

    This piece describes this virtue-signaling jargon ie ‘white privilege’ as a status move.

    https://quillette.com/2019/11/16/thorstein-veblens-theory-of-the-leisure-class-a-status-update/

    A really great piece, and if it isn’t iSteve material I don’t know what is.

    • Replies: @Justvisiting
    @Ghost of Bull Moose

    Good point on status signaling.

    My take on it is that when people have unearned wealth they can devolve into a "cargo cult" where stuff just mysteriously appears on the island with no rational explanation.

    They then create myths/religions to explain that which cannot be explained by their limited intelligence.

    The ignorance is due (in part) to modern education's refusal to educate school children on the basics of micro economics.

    Replies: @Ghost of Bull Moose

  76. So when Mr. Moore went to visit in Columbus this summer, the whole family sat together to watch two movies on Netflix: “13th,” the documentary about racial inequities in the American criminal justice system, and “Just Mercy,” a real-life legal drama about a Black Alabama man imprisoned for a murder he didn’t commit.

    “It’s kind of like you’re sitting there watching things and like, even I had no idea,” Mr. Moore said, watching one of the three TV’s in his house that were tuned to Fox News at that moment. “It’s like we need to talk about this more, you know? Just gathering bits and pieces of information, even before George Floyd.”

    He added: “I have Black friends and they told me about something that happens pretty regularly, even today in some of your larger cities, called gentrification. Never heard the word before.”

    How hard did they have to search to find this guy? Takes what Netflix propaganda tells him at face value and then comes out with, basically, “Gentrifeecation? Whoee! I didn’t know nothin ’bout that! Golly! They shore don’t talk about eet on Fox News!”

  77. Boorn was apprehensive, worried about climate change, about what her sons were learning by growing up white in America. Now she is worried about the prospect of four more years with Mr. Trump in the White House.

    In short, she subscribes to the modern liberal pseudo-cult religion.

    “My husband and I both grew up in northeast Ohio and it’s rural,” she said. “There are people who are openly racist. Coming down to Columbus, we made friends with people of all colors and all religions and it’s so hard to tell people who don’t see that these are just people — it’s not what you see on Fox News.”

    A short stay in Kenosha might be educational.

    I feel sorry for her sons. They’ll either grow up as broken shells of men or rebel entirely and end up on 4chan.

    • Replies: @Art Deco
    @Jane Plain

    They’ll either grow up as broken shells of men or rebel entirely and end up on 4chan.

    No, they'll grow up like other young men. It's just that their inclination to not take their mother seriously will be somewhat more elaborate than most.

    , @Jane Plain
    @Jane Plain

    You're a sad case, Art Deco. You're on ignore now.

  78. @Rosie
    @throtler


    This article is tailor-made for misogynistic outbursts.
     
    Female treachery justifies disenfranchisement of women, while male treachery, however momentous in its consequences, has no public policy implications whatsoever.

    Misogynists used to attempt to justify their desire for a reactionary crackdown on women by resort to our voting behavior. Since 2016, that argument is no longer tenable. Now, they just rely on things random women say to the prestige press and claim these women represent the whole of White womanhood. It's pathetic, really.

    Replies: @Pop Warner, @throtler, @Wyatt

    You’re wrong. I don’t want men to vote either.

    Our current state is the end result of the liberal democracy experiment that founded this republic. Liberals are nothing more than proto-bolsheviks, and it’s no surprise that the egalitarian mindset pushed by the Enlightenment finds its logical conclusion in communism with its absurd and unrealistic focus on “equality.” Centuries from now the concept of every adult having the vote will be seen as a curiosity from a bygone era where men went mad

    • Agree: BB753, Ben tillman
    • Disagree: GoRedWings!
    • Replies: @Rosie
    @Pop Warner


    You’re wrong. I don’t want men to vote either.

    Our current state is the end result of the liberal democracy experiment that founded this republic. Liberals are nothing more than proto-bolsheviks, and it’s no surprise that the egalitarian mindset pushed by the Enlightenment finds its logical conclusion in communism with its absurd and unrealistic focus on “equality.” Centuries from now the concept of every adult having the vote will be seen as a curiosity from a bygone era where men went mad
     
    Disagree. If you will recall, the chant was not just Equality! It was Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity! Certain people who control our erstwhile democracy have used the first two and disallowed any appeal to the last one. The French Revolution was a nationalist movement. Napoleon turned it into something else, and modern cosmopolitan liberals are cut from that same universalist cloth.

    There is no conceivable system of government that will not succumb to determined subversives.

    Replies: @Jane Plain, @Pop Warner

    , @BB753
    @Pop Warner

    Yeah, who said anything about democracy and voting? I despise democracy. In its modern form, it's just a tool for oligarchs to rule unimpeded and it comes from the 18th Century freemasonic "Enlightenment" and Revolutions, not from Athens.

  79. @The Germ Theory of Disease
    @Anonymous

    Nope, starts with a J, always does. Do you ever, ever, ever hear a J weeping and bemoaning excessive J privilege? And a guilty mandate to investigate and condemn J privilege? Ever?

    If you poke around these things long enough, this relentless assault on white people, you always mysteriously start to find J after J after J backstage.

    Funny how that works.

    Replies: @HallParvey, @ben tillman, @vinteuil

    Nope, starts with a J, always does. Do you ever, ever, ever hear a J weeping and bemoaning excessive J privilege? And a guilty mandate to investigate and condemn J privilege? Ever?

    No. Good point.

    • Replies: @Ghost of Bull Moose
    @ben tillman

    What about Jewish Voice for Peace, Students for Justice in Palestine and BDS? 'Js' who bitch about Jewish privilege constantly.

    Replies: @Ben tillman

  80. @ben tillman
    @The Germ Theory of Disease


    Nope, starts with a J, always does. Do you ever, ever, ever hear a J weeping and bemoaning excessive J privilege? And a guilty mandate to investigate and condemn J privilege? Ever?
     
    No. Good point.

    Replies: @Ghost of Bull Moose

    What about Jewish Voice for Peace, Students for Justice in Palestine and BDS? ‘Js’ who bitch about Jewish privilege constantly.

    • Replies: @Ben tillman
    @Ghost of Bull Moose

    Not in this country or anywhere else Jews are a minority.

    Replies: @Ghost of Bull Moose

  81. She was a “Life Long Republican”. Aren’t they all? Lets see:

    1) thinks other white people are racist.
    2) Hates fox news
    3) Loves Biden and watched “all” of the DNC Convention
    4) Is worried about Trump and “White privilege”
    5) Gets article in the NYT.

    Of course she’s a Republican. She’s a Christie todd whitman, Jim Jeffords, Colin Powell Republican. Y’know the type of Republican who acts/thinks/votes like a Liberal Democrat but CALLS themselves a Republican.

    • Agree: TWS
    • Replies: @res
    @Honesthughgrant

    It reads like she was a pro-life litmus test Republican. Then changed her mind because of a difficult pregnancy. See my earlier comment for more detail.

    P.S. That fits in very nicely with the standard "loves to tell people what to do, but God forbid the rules apply to her."

    , @Art Deco
    @Honesthughgrant

    She wasn't. That part the reporter fabricated.

    As for Powell and Jeffords, both were Republicans because that was the line of least resistance at the time of their life when party affiliation came to matter. As for Whitman, she and her husband are standard issue northeastern patricians. They're not invested in any issue other than tax rates. People like that tend to dislike "big Jesus Christers", so the Southern, evangelical, and old-school Catholic elements in the Republican Party repel them.

    Replies: @res

  82. @Daniel H
    Ms. Boorn is white, from Ohio, married to an intelligent, high functioning white man. Somebody really ought to explain to this white lady that the greatest danger to her sons' well-being is fentanyl/heroin, and it is EVERYWHERE in her social and geographic hood, leave aside EVERYTHING else.

    Based on her demographics, my guestimate is that there is at least a 10% chance that one of her sons will pick up the needle and spoon, and from there there is only one ending. I pray for her and her sons.

    Replies: @Rosie, @Cloudbuster, @Achmed E. Newman

    A needle and a spoon, and a trip to the moon…

    Sorry, Daniel, this is not any argument or agreement, but your one sentence brought back an old memory of Lynyrd Skynyrd:

    • Thanks: bruce county, BB753
    • Replies: @bruce county
    @Achmed E. Newman

    The first Skynard album I ever bought was the live "One More (For) From The Road... Live at the Fox Theater.
    Incredible..Sounded amazing on my little Dynaco tube amp over my Altec Lansing A7-500's Votts..

    I'm as hot as a fox in a forest fire...

    Replies: @Ben tillman

  83. @Bernard
    The marriage is doomed.

    Replies: @Anonymous, @3g4me, @res, @ScarletNumber

    @6 Bernard: Who gives a f&*k about their marriage? I feel sorrow and terror at the future of those poor little White boys – already pathologized by their hysterical mother. Women are out of control, and while they and their irrational emotions run rampant, the world burns.

  84. So that woman has swallowed the “oppressed peoples, allies, and white oppressors” social notion.

    And she’s a Good Girl, one of the “allies.”

  85. Joe Biden is basically Biff Tannen, from the car dealership background to the sleazy “hands-on” treatment meted out to any female striking his fancy. Fight white male privilege, vote Biden! It’s like blonde, rich-b!tch woman Senators like Hillary and Kirsten McKarenFace GhislaineBrand crying crocodile tears about white privilege as they savagely claw anyone in reach for the only privilege left unstated by them.

  86. @Rosie
    @throtler


    This article is tailor-made for misogynistic outbursts.
     
    Female treachery justifies disenfranchisement of women, while male treachery, however momentous in its consequences, has no public policy implications whatsoever.

    Misogynists used to attempt to justify their desire for a reactionary crackdown on women by resort to our voting behavior. Since 2016, that argument is no longer tenable. Now, they just rely on things random women say to the prestige press and claim these women represent the whole of White womanhood. It's pathetic, really.

    Replies: @Pop Warner, @throtler, @Wyatt

    I totally agree with you.

  87. 1) How did the NYT find this particular couple? Did they have a story in mind and found this pair as the best available to fit it, or did they stumble onto this family and decide it merited a story?

    2) Who is making the payments on “her” car, which now sports a BLM sticker?

  88. @Ghost of Bull Moose
    @JohnnyWalker123

    This piece describes this virtue-signaling jargon ie 'white privilege' as a status move.

    https://quillette.com/2019/11/16/thorstein-veblens-theory-of-the-leisure-class-a-status-update/

    A really great piece, and if it isn't iSteve material I don't know what is.

    Replies: @Justvisiting

    Good point on status signaling.

    My take on it is that when people have unearned wealth they can devolve into a “cargo cult” where stuff just mysteriously appears on the island with no rational explanation.

    They then create myths/religions to explain that which cannot be explained by their limited intelligence.

    The ignorance is due (in part) to modern education’s refusal to educate school children on the basics of micro economics.

    • Replies: @Ghost of Bull Moose
    @Justvisiting

    The Quillette piece I linked to talks about the class element. You imitate those above you, and differentiate yourself from those below. There is a cargo cult element, in that the proles adopt these ideas as if the ideas themselves are the essence of status. Like building an airplane out of bamboo. They don't understand the underlying concepts.

  89. @Rosie
    @throtler


    This article is tailor-made for misogynistic outbursts.
     
    Female treachery justifies disenfranchisement of women, while male treachery, however momentous in its consequences, has no public policy implications whatsoever.

    Misogynists used to attempt to justify their desire for a reactionary crackdown on women by resort to our voting behavior. Since 2016, that argument is no longer tenable. Now, they just rely on things random women say to the prestige press and claim these women represent the whole of White womanhood. It's pathetic, really.

    Replies: @Pop Warner, @throtler, @Wyatt

    That’s not what he said. When you look back at the history of leftist movements in the United States, you will see blacks, jews and women. When you look at the modern Democratic Party in the US complaining about whites and the west, you see blacks, jews and women. Those three groups are principally responsible for the social and political agitation that has rotted America. In the case of blacks and women, it’s easy to get them to buy into oppression narratives because it makes them feel good about themselves to believe something without actually having done anything.

    Haven’t you noticed all the box wine bitches who think their Twitter activism counts for anything? What about all the screechy cunts who put themselves front and center during the riots? Women are actually part of the reason that reactionary conservative is so strong. When someone like Charlie Kirk or Ben Shapiro “destroys a liberal with facts and logic” the most pitiful of liberals are the women. The guys will come up and either be raging dicks or sometimes be sensible, but the women are always mousy, they never address statistics and always rely on their feelings to guide their opinions. And yet, despite this lacking sense of reality, they will always be the most narcissistic and condescending. They are the ones who motivate people to hate the left because they’re so far removed from reality.

    And that’s the one good thing about the left being so thoroughly entrenched with women because women moving into anything inevitably decays the environment.

    This happened in the military with reduced physical standards and handholding for recruits.
    This happened in gaming when the feminists decided to peddle their grift.
    This happened in Occupy Wall Street when gender bullshit entered the fray.
    This happened in Congress with bitches like Mazie Hirono telling men to sit down and shut up.
    This happened in academia as female social science professors started popping up like cancer polyps and infecting kids.
    This happens with feminists who try to make all female companies and watch all their work be burned to the ground by catfighting. Coincidentally, this also happens with blacks who try to uplift the ghettos. Once shot at, twice shy. Speaking of, can I interest you in this aptly named song?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woman_Is_the_Nigger_of_the_World

    Whines about white men? Check.
    Complains endlessly about oppression? Check.
    Wants government handouts? Check.
    Wants to do the hard, dirty jobs nobody else wants? Shiiiiiiieeeeeeet

    Seriously, where can you point to that women have made a tremendous benefit through their inclusion? I can point to a hundred where their inclusion caused a decline. Also, if women didn’t vote in the 2016 election, Trump would have won still. Hell, he would have won by greater margins.

    • Agree: BB753, 3g4me
    • Replies: @Rosie
    @Wyatt

    I have repeatedly refuted every talking point you list here. Nonetheless, I am a patient woman, so I will explain it again, but it will have to be in installments. Being a mother, I don't have time to write whole essays on these threads.

    I'll just start with your first paragraph. I'm going to assume, for the sake of argument, that everything you say here is true. None of that compares to the momentous destruction of Western civilization that has resulted from male greed.

    https://time.com/5343074/libre-koch-congress-immigration/

    There are literally hundreds of White male billionaires in the world. Not one of them will spend a nickel to defend their race. NOT EVEN ONE!

    Find me a male billionaire financier and I'll get heels on the ground right quick.

    https://psmag.com/.image/c_fit%2Ccs_srgb%2Cfl_progressive%2Cq_auto:good%2Cw_620/MTU0Nzg4MDgwODc0Njk0MDg2/mothersofmassive_frontcover_tsb1wg.jpg

    Replies: @Abe, @Wyatt

    , @Reg Cæsar
    @Wyatt


    Seriously, where can you point to that women have made a tremendous benefit through their inclusion?
     
    Early referenda on women's suffrage allowed women to vote on the issue along with men. It bombed worse than it did with an all-male electorate. The suffragettes made damned sure any future referenda were limited to the already enfranchised population.

    My favorite case is 1912 in Wisconsin. Urban German socialists allied with their conservative rural cousins to defeat suffrage by a landslide. Of course, few of them really cared either way about suffrage. It's that the suffragists were Prohibitionist as well.

    The referendum carried the blue-nose Scandinavian counties, but it wasn't enough. Squareheads had to find some other way to handle their numerous drunks.
    , @Rosie
    @Wyatt


    Haven’t you noticed all the box wine bitches who think their Twitter activism counts for anything? What about all the screechy cunts who put themselves front and center during the riots? Women are actually part of the reason that reactionary conservative is so strong. When someone like Charlie Kirk or Ben Shapiro “destroys a liberal with facts and logic” the most pitiful of liberals are the women. The guys will come up and either be raging dicks or sometimes be sensible, but the women are always mousy, they never address statistics and always rely on their feelings to guide their opinions. And yet, despite this lacking sense of reality, they will always be the most narcissistic and condescending. They are the ones who motivate people to hate the left because they’re so far removed from reality.
     
    Moving on. Here you mention statistics, but fail to vote any in support of your own screed. Indeed, there is nothing factual in this whole paragraph. It's just vague impressions and unfalsifiable anecdotes.


    And that’s the one good thing about the left being so thoroughly entrenched with women because women moving into anything inevitably decays the environment.
     
    So you say.


    This happened in the military with reduced physical standards and handholding for recruits.
    This happened in gaming when the feminists decided to peddle their grift.
    This happened in Occupy Wall Street when gender bullshit entered the fray.

     

    These are all very contextual issues, and given the fact that I'm not in the military, a gamer, or involved in radical political movements, I am not in a position to opine one way or another. I will say that your claim implies that men are literally incapable of being fair. They can only either exclude or indulge, nothing in between. Since you feel free to share your impressions, I'll share mine. I have moved a great deal in Male-dominated environments in my life, and generally been treated very graciously and fairly, though sometimes after a bit of hazing. Nor have I ever expected any sort of special treatment. I would consider it an insult.

    This happened in academia as female social science professors started popping up like cancer polyps and infecting kids.
     
    What do you mean "kids"? I thought men were immune to academic brainwashing?

    In any event, where is your evidence that women are responsible for leftist dominance in the social sciences? One could argue that modern-day racial egalitarianism started with a male Swedish economist.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/An_American_Dilemma

    Obviously, one man doesn't prove anything one way or the other, but how many tenured White male academics, or even retirees, are there in this country? Tens of thousands? And how many will speak up against political correctness? You can count them on one hand. KMac, Rushton, Duchesne. Go ahead. How many can you think of?

    This happens with feminists who try to make all female companies and watch all their work be burned to the ground by catfighting.
     
    It's illegal to discriminate on the basis of sex, so I don't know where you're getting this from. Details, please.

    To be continued...
  90. @San Fernando Curt
    (((Reid J. Epstein)))

    ...so don't believe a word of it.

    Replies: @ari silver

    Good catch! I was suspicious of this part of the bio:Ohio State-educated chemical engineer, who left the work force to home-school her three sons. I think tall tale.

    • Replies: @Alden
    @ari silver

    I don’t believe either this woman or the man exists. It’s just a mass of enlightenment cliches. When I used to read newspapers there were articles like this all the time.

    So she doesn’t work. How will she support her sons 30 and 40 years from now? As White men, affirmative action makes them unemployable.

    Replies: @Steve Sailer

  91. @Not Only Wrathful
    How has she reached a point in her life where she values the narrative in her head more than real connection?

    Replies: @Ed, @Ed, @bomag, @JimDandy

    Men–including sons–now exist only as disposable tools for serving the narcissistic needs of women.

  92. @Anonymous
    @Bernard


    The marriage is doomed.
     
    and so are the kids.

    Replies: @ben tillman, @ari silver

    No husband is mentioned that’s a step dad, did I miss it?

  93. The Trumpkin sums it all up at the end:“I voted for President Trump, yeah, but I’m very opposed to corporate greed,” he said. “A lot of Republicans don’t want to talk about that, but it’s very real to me.”

  94. This nugget direct from the NYT complete article:

    “It’s hard waking up and realizing it’s not always black and white,” said Ms. Boorn, an Ohio State-educated chemical engineer, who left the work force to home-school her three sons.”

    What’s wrong Ms. Boorn? Are your kids too good to go to the wonderfully diverse public schools? Is it too “black and white”?

  95. Mr. Moore complained on his Facebook profile page about being forced to wear a mask at work, while Ms. Boorn put a Black Lives Matter sign on her car.

    Was on a Vietnam War reading kick about a year ago after watching the Ken Burns PBS documentary. Read the WE WERE WARRIORS… book upon which the Mel Gibson movie is based. A striking detail- as reinforcements were being helicoptered into the fire zone, a couple of reporters asked to tag along. OK, says an officer, so long as you strap on MR-15’s and are prepared to use them (chances are the reporters would have been shot at by VC even if UNARMED).

    Compare this to the caliber of millennial “reporting” required by this story- sit all day at a desk in an air-conditioned Manhattan office goofing off on monitoring Facebook, or Twitter, or TikTok. Dueling hashtags between some Ohio blue collar nobody and his status-striving stepdaughter hits your newscrawl. Bingo, you’ve got a national news story (holding the megaphone lets you decide when something ‘anecdotal’ becomes ‘emblematic’ and when something ‘emblematic’ becomes ‘iconic’), all without having to leave the complimentary-Avian water/wasabi-flavored soy bean packet perimeter of a NEW YORK TIMES office.

    • Agree: Cloudbuster
    • Replies: @Cloudbuster
    @Abe

    What's an MR-15?

    Replies: @Abe

    , @Jim Bob Lassiter
    @Abe

    That's priceless, like something from the plume of Tom Wolfe.

  96. @Mr. Anon

    “It’s hard raising white men in America,” she said of her three boys, ages 8, 5 and 16 months. “You want to understand that they understand their position as an ally.”
     
    What a bunch of mush. "understand that they understand...." Can't people even speak clearly anymore? What does this woman even mean by that?

    Replies: @J.Ross, @JohnnyWalker123, @Kolya Krassotkin, @Alec Leamas (hard at work), @Lagertha

    “It’s hard raising white men in America,” she said of her three boys, ages 8, 5 and 16 months. “You want to understand that they understand their position as an ally.”

    What a bunch of mush. “understand that they understand….” Can’t people even speak clearly anymore? What does this woman even mean by that?

    Ostensibly it means “I will punch into these kids’ heads sufficient self-loathing for their white skin that they will grow to sublimate it and direct their hatred towards badwhites.”

    The jargonese is part of the appeal – it’s nonsensical and opaque, but it’s a marker of this woman’s aspirations to be part of the managerial elite class.

  97. Proof positive that White women are the eternal and natural enemy of White men.

    Her son’s as allies will be at best janitors or Starbucks baristas or gig workers. While blacks get all the good, high paying jobs.

    But White women tingles for black criminal uber alles. Blm knows what it is doing. About 85% if White women tingle for black criminal s. Highlighting thugs is a feature for tingles. Not a bug.

    Biden and Harris especially are likely to get 85% of White women voters. Off tingles for black thugs.

    • Disagree: notsaying, YetAnotherAnon
    • Troll: Anonymousse
    • Replies: @Rosie
    @Whiskey


    But White women tingles for black criminal uber alles. Blm knows what it is doing. About 85% if White women tingle for black criminal s. Highlighting thugs is a feature for tingles. Not a bug.

    Biden and Harris especially are likely to get 85% of White women voters. Off tingles for black thugs.
     
    I know Whiskey's feelings don't care about my facts, but for those who actually care...

    https://cms.qz.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/ethnic-preferences2.png?w=1200&h=900&crop=1&strip=all&quality=75

    Replies: @Alden

    , @SMK
    @Whiskey

    Yes, Channon Christian was the luckiest white women who ever lived before a monster and subhuman beast cut off her breasts and jammed her naked body into a garbage to bleed to death, far luckier than myriads of other white women and girls who've been raped and gang-raped by black males since her body and mind, unlike those of nearly all of the other white females, was tingling for days as she was gang-raped, vaginally and anally, for days by at least 5 black male criminals, rather than for minutes or at most a few hours.

    Your misogyny is so evil and insane it's enough to sicken even many MRAs, the misogynist lunatics of the soi-disant "men's movement."

  98. @Bernard
    The marriage is doomed.

    Replies: @Anonymous, @3g4me, @res, @ScarletNumber

    The excerpt is a bit confusing. He is Dan Moore and she is Kelley Boorn who is Moore’s stepdaughter–not her husband. I think this additional context both clarifies things and makes the allegiances much more interesting.

    Before Donald J. Trump began his first presidential campaign, Mr. Moore was a reliable Democrat who had twice voted for Barack Obama. Like legions of white union workers, he found Mr. Trump’s 2016 campaign pledge to shake up Washington appealing. He plans to vote for him again in November.

    Two hours away in Columbus, Ohio, Mr. Moore’s stepdaughter, Kelley Boorn, cheered Ms. Harris’s selection. A longtime Republican who was once a vehement anti-abortion activist, her views shifted after a difficult pregnancy. She went from being a one-issue voter and an enthusiastic backer of John McCain’s in 2008, to sitting out in 2012 to becoming an enthusiastic Democratic voter in 2016 and 2020.

  99. @Abe

    Mr. Moore complained on his Facebook profile page about being forced to wear a mask at work, while Ms. Boorn put a Black Lives Matter sign on her car.
     
    Was on a Vietnam War reading kick about a year ago after watching the Ken Burns PBS documentary. Read the WE WERE WARRIORS... book upon which the Mel Gibson movie is based. A striking detail- as reinforcements were being helicoptered into the fire zone, a couple of reporters asked to tag along. OK, says an officer, so long as you strap on MR-15’s and are prepared to use them (chances are the reporters would have been shot at by VC even if UNARMED).

    Compare this to the caliber of millennial “reporting” required by this story- sit all day at a desk in an air-conditioned Manhattan office goofing off on monitoring Facebook, or Twitter, or TikTok. Dueling hashtags between some Ohio blue collar nobody and his status-striving stepdaughter hits your newscrawl. Bingo, you’ve got a national news story (holding the megaphone lets you decide when something ‘anecdotal’ becomes ‘emblematic’ and when something ‘emblematic’ becomes ‘iconic’), all without having to leave the complimentary-Avian water/wasabi-flavored soy bean packet perimeter of a NEW YORK TIMES office.

    Replies: @Cloudbuster, @Jim Bob Lassiter

    What’s an MR-15?

    • Replies: @Abe
    @Cloudbuster


    What’s an MR-15?
     
    Sorry, typo/autocorrect- AR-15 aka M-16 - I think it was still even called the AR-15 at the time of the Battle of Ia Drang depicted in the book/movie (my iPhone, BTW, ever so unhelpfully auto-suggests “Orientalism” then fights me all the way when I want to text my wife about getting some Applebees “Oriental Chicken Salad”)

    Replies: @Joe Stalin

  100. @Honesthughgrant
    She was a "Life Long Republican". Aren't they all? Lets see:

    1) thinks other white people are racist.
    2) Hates fox news
    3) Loves Biden and watched "all" of the DNC Convention
    4) Is worried about Trump and "White privilege"
    5) Gets article in the NYT.

    Of course she's a Republican. She's a Christie todd whitman, Jim Jeffords, Colin Powell Republican. Y'know the type of Republican who acts/thinks/votes like a Liberal Democrat but CALLS themselves a Republican.

    Replies: @res, @Art Deco

    It reads like she was a pro-life litmus test Republican. Then changed her mind because of a difficult pregnancy. See my earlier comment for more detail.

    P.S. That fits in very nicely with the standard “loves to tell people what to do, but God forbid the rules apply to her.”

  101. @Jane Plain

    Boorn was apprehensive, worried about climate change, about what her sons were learning by growing up white in America. Now she is worried about the prospect of four more years with Mr. Trump in the White House.

     

    In short, she subscribes to the modern liberal pseudo-cult religion.

    “My husband and I both grew up in northeast Ohio and it’s rural,” she said. “There are people who are openly racist. Coming down to Columbus, we made friends with people of all colors and all religions and it’s so hard to tell people who don’t see that these are just people — it’s not what you see on Fox News.”
     
    A short stay in Kenosha might be educational.

    I feel sorry for her sons. They'll either grow up as broken shells of men or rebel entirely and end up on 4chan.

    Replies: @Art Deco, @Jane Plain

    They’ll either grow up as broken shells of men or rebel entirely and end up on 4chan.

    No, they’ll grow up like other young men. It’s just that their inclination to not take their mother seriously will be somewhat more elaborate than most.

  102. @Honesthughgrant
    She was a "Life Long Republican". Aren't they all? Lets see:

    1) thinks other white people are racist.
    2) Hates fox news
    3) Loves Biden and watched "all" of the DNC Convention
    4) Is worried about Trump and "White privilege"
    5) Gets article in the NYT.

    Of course she's a Republican. She's a Christie todd whitman, Jim Jeffords, Colin Powell Republican. Y'know the type of Republican who acts/thinks/votes like a Liberal Democrat but CALLS themselves a Republican.

    Replies: @res, @Art Deco

    She wasn’t. That part the reporter fabricated.

    As for Powell and Jeffords, both were Republicans because that was the line of least resistance at the time of their life when party affiliation came to matter. As for Whitman, she and her husband are standard issue northeastern patricians. They’re not invested in any issue other than tax rates. People like that tend to dislike “big Jesus Christers”, so the Southern, evangelical, and old-school Catholic elements in the Republican Party repel them.

    • Replies: @res
    @Art Deco


    She wasn’t. That part the reporter fabricated.
     
    What makes you say that? I think the explanation given in the article (see my earlier comment) made sense.

    Replies: @Art Deco

  103. @Giancarlo M. Kumquat
    Someday I will look back at Kamala Harris' speech,and I will say to myself, "Man,what a load of shit!"

    Replies: @Adam Smith

    Someday?

  104. @Pop Warner
    @Rosie

    You're wrong. I don't want men to vote either.

    Our current state is the end result of the liberal democracy experiment that founded this republic. Liberals are nothing more than proto-bolsheviks, and it's no surprise that the egalitarian mindset pushed by the Enlightenment finds its logical conclusion in communism with its absurd and unrealistic focus on "equality." Centuries from now the concept of every adult having the vote will be seen as a curiosity from a bygone era where men went mad

    Replies: @Rosie, @BB753

    You’re wrong. I don’t want men to vote either.

    Our current state is the end result of the liberal democracy experiment that founded this republic. Liberals are nothing more than proto-bolsheviks, and it’s no surprise that the egalitarian mindset pushed by the Enlightenment finds its logical conclusion in communism with its absurd and unrealistic focus on “equality.” Centuries from now the concept of every adult having the vote will be seen as a curiosity from a bygone era where men went mad

    Disagree. If you will recall, the chant was not just Equality! It was Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity! Certain people who control our erstwhile democracy have used the first two and disallowed any appeal to the last one. The French Revolution was a nationalist movement. Napoleon turned it into something else, and modern cosmopolitan liberals are cut from that same universalist cloth.

    There is no conceivable system of government that will not succumb to determined subversives.

    • Replies: @Jane Plain
    @Rosie


    There is no conceivable system of government that will not succumb to determined subversives.

     

    True, that. The liberals love to quote Margaret Mead: "“Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed, citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.”

    I think you and she are saying the same thing, no?

    I would add, a charismatic leader. A small group of people (committed, thoughtful maybe, fanatic and crazed, maybe), plus a charismatic leader, to drag along a critical mass of normies.

    , @Pop Warner
    @Rosie

    The French Revolution was a Satanic movement, no different from the Bolshevik coup in Russia. The revolutionaries were nothing more than mass murderers deluded by revenge fantasies and lust for power. They lost all credibility when their brutality exceeded that of the Ancien Regime they overthrew. I spit on the notion of Liberty and Equality, equality is something that only exists in the legal realm. There is no equality in nature, only equilibrium achieved through hierarchy.

    Replies: @Rosie, @Alden

  105. @Wyatt
    @Rosie

    That's not what he said. When you look back at the history of leftist movements in the United States, you will see blacks, jews and women. When you look at the modern Democratic Party in the US complaining about whites and the west, you see blacks, jews and women. Those three groups are principally responsible for the social and political agitation that has rotted America. In the case of blacks and women, it's easy to get them to buy into oppression narratives because it makes them feel good about themselves to believe something without actually having done anything.

    Haven't you noticed all the box wine bitches who think their Twitter activism counts for anything? What about all the screechy cunts who put themselves front and center during the riots? Women are actually part of the reason that reactionary conservative is so strong. When someone like Charlie Kirk or Ben Shapiro "destroys a liberal with facts and logic" the most pitiful of liberals are the women. The guys will come up and either be raging dicks or sometimes be sensible, but the women are always mousy, they never address statistics and always rely on their feelings to guide their opinions. And yet, despite this lacking sense of reality, they will always be the most narcissistic and condescending. They are the ones who motivate people to hate the left because they're so far removed from reality.

    And that's the one good thing about the left being so thoroughly entrenched with women because women moving into anything inevitably decays the environment.

    This happened in the military with reduced physical standards and handholding for recruits.
    This happened in gaming when the feminists decided to peddle their grift.
    This happened in Occupy Wall Street when gender bullshit entered the fray.
    This happened in Congress with bitches like Mazie Hirono telling men to sit down and shut up.
    This happened in academia as female social science professors started popping up like cancer polyps and infecting kids.
    This happens with feminists who try to make all female companies and watch all their work be burned to the ground by catfighting. Coincidentally, this also happens with blacks who try to uplift the ghettos. Once shot at, twice shy. Speaking of, can I interest you in this aptly named song?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woman_Is_the_Nigger_of_the_World

    Whines about white men? Check.
    Complains endlessly about oppression? Check.
    Wants government handouts? Check.
    Wants to do the hard, dirty jobs nobody else wants? Shiiiiiiieeeeeeet

    Seriously, where can you point to that women have made a tremendous benefit through their inclusion? I can point to a hundred where their inclusion caused a decline. Also, if women didn't vote in the 2016 election, Trump would have won still. Hell, he would have won by greater margins.

    Replies: @Rosie, @Reg Cæsar, @Rosie

    I have repeatedly refuted every talking point you list here. Nonetheless, I am a patient woman, so I will explain it again, but it will have to be in installments. Being a mother, I don’t have time to write whole essays on these threads.

    I’ll just start with your first paragraph. I’m going to assume, for the sake of argument, that everything you say here is true. None of that compares to the momentous destruction of Western civilization that has resulted from male greed.

    https://time.com/5343074/libre-koch-congress-immigration/

    There are literally hundreds of White male billionaires in the world. Not one of them will spend a nickel to defend their race. NOT EVEN ONE!

    Find me a male billionaire financier and I’ll get heels on the ground right quick.

    • Agree: Alden
    • Thanks: Abe
    • Replies: @Abe
    @Rosie

    Still not 100% sure you’re really a woman, but to unparaphrase Wise Latina Supreme Court Justice’s bowdlerization of a genuinely wise proverb, “a wise old man and wise old woman will come to the same judgment”.

    I started watching the jock-sniffing Michael Jordan documentary LAST DANCE during my workouts recently despite my better judgement. There is a segment early on where Jordan disavows any involvement in mid-80’s Bulls “traveling cocaine circus” antics, saying that as an NBA rookie he was content merely to hang out in his apartment, drink milk, watch movies, and writer letters back home to his North Carolina big black momma, at which point I burst out laughing, thinking what a shame the upright and continent Jordan ran into that bad seed Tiger Woods, who proceeded to hopelessly compromise him with hookers, drugs, and gambling.

    The point being, there is still such a market for American males’ pathetic, juvenile sports celebrity hero-worship (one tiny aspect of which is keeping Jordan forever the same SPACE JAMMIN’ teddybear he once and will always be in the minds of millions of impressionable 30-something American men-children) that even “conservative” men of dazzling wealth and influence like T. Boone Pickens, Jerry Jones, etc. instead of doing something meaningful with it, just funnel it back into what is effectively the Great American jogga/white coed rape pipeline.

    Replies: @Rosie, @Steve Sailer

    , @Wyatt
    @Rosie

    Rosie, how many of those male billionaires are jewish? Because when I look at destructive billionaires, I notice that most of them are jewish and the few who are even close to decent are definitely not jewish, i.e., Elon Musk and Peter Thiel. At the very least, they push for more right wing values. No one is allowed to have pro-white values openly. A black man can't even appeal to the center without getting harangued by the left.

    Further, there are only a handful of female billionaires (virtually all of them wealthy only because of entrepreneurial male relatives) and all of the ones I found are left wing and shit. At the very least, Bill Gates has sterilized a bunch of Africans. It doesn't directly benefit whites, but the world isn't smarting from a lack of blacks.

    The fact of the matter is that women have served as the fodder for leftist and neo-con movements that have undermined western civilization. We saw how the principally male fascist and socialist movements of the former half of the 20th century rose and fell, but the countries they dominated survived. The social-justice movements, white guilt industry and academic brainwashing institutions have become more and more dominated by women as time has gone on. Likewise, they've gotten shittier, more bold faced and vile as time has gone on.

    It's like I said. The principle value of women in a movement is the clockwork destruction they bring to that movement. The left is in the early stages of its own death and its because of the sheer volume of female bodies being fed into the revolutionary grinder. So far, the nationalist movements are on the rise and the lack of women has left them still capable of rising.

    Replies: @Rosie, @Rosie

  106. @Whiskey
    Proof positive that White women are the eternal and natural enemy of White men.

    Her son's as allies will be at best janitors or Starbucks baristas or gig workers. While blacks get all the good, high paying jobs.

    But White women tingles for black criminal uber alles. Blm knows what it is doing. About 85% if White women tingle for black criminal s. Highlighting thugs is a feature for tingles. Not a bug.

    Biden and Harris especially are likely to get 85% of White women voters. Off tingles for black thugs.

    Replies: @Rosie, @SMK

    But White women tingles for black criminal uber alles. Blm knows what it is doing. About 85% if White women tingle for black criminal s. Highlighting thugs is a feature for tingles. Not a bug.

    Biden and Harris especially are likely to get 85% of White women voters. Off tingles for black thugs.

    I know Whiskey’s feelings don’t care about my facts, but for those who actually care…

    • Replies: @Alden
    @Rosie

    What’s funny is this is just a standard NYLIES article. He made up the article and then went to Ohio and may or may not have spoken with any real women.

    But the nerd wimp repressed gay misogynist White women hating MEN OF UNZ fell for the lies. Totally naive morons to believe a word in the NYLIES. And that’s their reason to start a blast of White women hatred because the repressed gay woman less child less feckless useless clueless Woody Allen Seth Rogen look alikes just have to blast their psycho sexual problems all over the internet for the world to see. They should suffer in silence instead of using Steve’s articles as group therapy for creeps who can’t get laid.

    They should start their own blog IHateWhiteWomenblogspot.

    Replies: @Steve Sailer

  107. @Dago Shoes
    @Ed

    Who's leading her? She's making choices to deliberately shape her sons' lives in ways that will likely not be positive … child abuse at the very least … and her own mental illness (look at the statistics on liberal women, 19-35 years old, who admit to having been diagnosed with depression, anxiety disorders and such -- as well as the 'dark triad' profile of these SJW/virtue signaling types.

    Replies: @anon

    Who’s leading her?

    All of her friends on Fakebook, Twatter and/or Instant-gram, of course.
    Social media is like opiods to most women: numbing and addictive.

    • Agree: Ed
    • Replies: @The Wild Geese Howard
    @anon


    Social media is like opiods to most women: numbing and addictive.
     
    Even worse than that, many have learned how to convert their social media into an income stream.
  108. @Cloudbuster
    @Abe

    What's an MR-15?

    Replies: @Abe

    What’s an MR-15?

    Sorry, typo/autocorrect- AR-15 aka M-16 – I think it was still even called the AR-15 at the time of the Battle of Ia Drang depicted in the book/movie (my iPhone, BTW, ever so unhelpfully auto-suggests “Orientalism” then fights me all the way when I want to text my wife about getting some Applebees “Oriental Chicken Salad”)

    • Replies: @Joe Stalin
    @Abe


    Sorry, typo/autocorrect- AR-15 aka M-16 – I think it was still even called the AR-15 at the time of the Battle of Ia Drang depicted in the book/movie
     

    [...] took place November 14–16, 1965 at LZ X-Ray, located at the eastern foot of the Chu Pong Massif in the central highlands of Vietnam.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Ia_Drang
     

    First Mass Issued AR-15

    The Brownells XBRN16E1® Rifle replicates the design of the first AR-15 to be issued in mass numbers to US Army on the ground in Vietnam.

    The XM16E1 was adopted by the US Army in 1963 and was issued to troops in 1965. It was the first rifle to feature the now prominent forward assist, and had other features that would lead to the M16A1. The XM16E1 was the first model also with the classic black triangle handguard, and prominently featured a 3 prong flash hider at the muzzle. This was also the last US issued AR-15 type rifle to include some variants with chrome bolt carrier groups.

    https://www.brownells.com/.aspx/bapid=616/ClientPage/brownells-16e1
     
    Retro XM16E1 rifles if you need an AR for fun.

    https://www.brownells.com/.aspx/bapid=616/ClientPage/brownells-16e1

    https://cdn-fsly.yottaa.net/53ff2f503c881650e20004c9/www.brownells.com/v~4b.10f/userdocs/Miscellaneous/brownells-retro-rifle-line/xbrn16e1u/gallery/078-000-401c.jpg?yocs=p_

    Replies: @nokangaroos

  109. Brayden Harrington

    Bra[y]den was the second-most hated boy’s name in a 2014 survey, and #1, 3, 4, and 6 rhymed with it.

    http://waxxradio.com/2014/03/21/most-hated-baby-names/

    Nevaeh and Destiny topped the girls’ list. They sound black, but aren’t absolutely so. Miley Cyrus is legally Destiny, and my son’s school yearbook shows a white Nevaeh. It’s an online school, so some of the parents are going to be weird.

    #3-6 among the girls all mean “son of __”. Yeah, really appropriate for a girl!

  110. @Wilkey

    “My husband and I both grew up in northeast Ohio and it’s rural...There are people who are openly racist. Coming down to Columbus, we made friends with people of all colors and all religions and it’s so hard to tell people who don’t see that these are just people...”
     
    This sounds like a speech I heard a hundred times while attending church as a kid. She sounds like a convert to a new religion, telling all the congregants in her new faith how bad the people in her old life were, or how misguided the people in her former faith were. You’re supposed to confess *your sins* but far more often they end confessing the “sins” of everyone else.

    Some of those people in their speeches even acknowledge abandoning and disowning their “wicked” family members, who have not yet seen the light of the new faith - just the way so many SJWs insult or even abandon their own family members who vote Republican.

    The more and more I see what’s happening the more I realize that “social justice” is indeed our new official state religion. Only it doesn’t call itself a religion, so none of us are allowed to exempt ourselves on First Amendment grounds.

    Replies: @Art Deco, @black sea

    This sounds like a speech I heard a hundred times while attending church as a kid.

    Years ago, some friends of mine were featured in a NYT story about affordable apartments in Jackson Heights. I congratulated them on their moment of fame, and though the article had nothing particularly political or controversial about it, they told me that they were taken aback at the journalistic liberties regarding the invention of quotations they had never uttered in the actual interview.

    This wasn’t just some editing and tidying; it was stuff made up from whole cloth. I guess the writer figured they would be flattered to see their names in print and wouldn’t make an issue of it, which they didn’t.

    I wouldn’t say they were angry exactly, but they were definitely surprised.

  111. @Pop Warner
    @Rosie

    You're wrong. I don't want men to vote either.

    Our current state is the end result of the liberal democracy experiment that founded this republic. Liberals are nothing more than proto-bolsheviks, and it's no surprise that the egalitarian mindset pushed by the Enlightenment finds its logical conclusion in communism with its absurd and unrealistic focus on "equality." Centuries from now the concept of every adult having the vote will be seen as a curiosity from a bygone era where men went mad

    Replies: @Rosie, @BB753

    Yeah, who said anything about democracy and voting? I despise democracy. In its modern form, it’s just a tool for oligarchs to rule unimpeded and it comes from the 18th Century freemasonic “Enlightenment” and Revolutions, not from Athens.

  112. @Wyatt
    @Rosie

    That's not what he said. When you look back at the history of leftist movements in the United States, you will see blacks, jews and women. When you look at the modern Democratic Party in the US complaining about whites and the west, you see blacks, jews and women. Those three groups are principally responsible for the social and political agitation that has rotted America. In the case of blacks and women, it's easy to get them to buy into oppression narratives because it makes them feel good about themselves to believe something without actually having done anything.

    Haven't you noticed all the box wine bitches who think their Twitter activism counts for anything? What about all the screechy cunts who put themselves front and center during the riots? Women are actually part of the reason that reactionary conservative is so strong. When someone like Charlie Kirk or Ben Shapiro "destroys a liberal with facts and logic" the most pitiful of liberals are the women. The guys will come up and either be raging dicks or sometimes be sensible, but the women are always mousy, they never address statistics and always rely on their feelings to guide their opinions. And yet, despite this lacking sense of reality, they will always be the most narcissistic and condescending. They are the ones who motivate people to hate the left because they're so far removed from reality.

    And that's the one good thing about the left being so thoroughly entrenched with women because women moving into anything inevitably decays the environment.

    This happened in the military with reduced physical standards and handholding for recruits.
    This happened in gaming when the feminists decided to peddle their grift.
    This happened in Occupy Wall Street when gender bullshit entered the fray.
    This happened in Congress with bitches like Mazie Hirono telling men to sit down and shut up.
    This happened in academia as female social science professors started popping up like cancer polyps and infecting kids.
    This happens with feminists who try to make all female companies and watch all their work be burned to the ground by catfighting. Coincidentally, this also happens with blacks who try to uplift the ghettos. Once shot at, twice shy. Speaking of, can I interest you in this aptly named song?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woman_Is_the_Nigger_of_the_World

    Whines about white men? Check.
    Complains endlessly about oppression? Check.
    Wants government handouts? Check.
    Wants to do the hard, dirty jobs nobody else wants? Shiiiiiiieeeeeeet

    Seriously, where can you point to that women have made a tremendous benefit through their inclusion? I can point to a hundred where their inclusion caused a decline. Also, if women didn't vote in the 2016 election, Trump would have won still. Hell, he would have won by greater margins.

    Replies: @Rosie, @Reg Cæsar, @Rosie

    Seriously, where can you point to that women have made a tremendous benefit through their inclusion?

    Early referenda on women’s suffrage allowed women to vote on the issue along with men. It bombed worse than it did with an all-male electorate. The suffragettes made damned sure any future referenda were limited to the already enfranchised population.

    My favorite case is 1912 in Wisconsin. Urban German socialists allied with their conservative rural cousins to defeat suffrage by a landslide. Of course, few of them really cared either way about suffrage. It’s that the suffragists were Prohibitionist as well.

    The referendum carried the blue-nose Scandinavian counties, but it wasn’t enough. Squareheads had to find some other way to handle their numerous drunks.

  113. SMK says: • Website
    @Whiskey
    Proof positive that White women are the eternal and natural enemy of White men.

    Her son's as allies will be at best janitors or Starbucks baristas or gig workers. While blacks get all the good, high paying jobs.

    But White women tingles for black criminal uber alles. Blm knows what it is doing. About 85% if White women tingle for black criminal s. Highlighting thugs is a feature for tingles. Not a bug.

    Biden and Harris especially are likely to get 85% of White women voters. Off tingles for black thugs.

    Replies: @Rosie, @SMK

    Yes, Channon Christian was the luckiest white women who ever lived before a monster and subhuman beast cut off her breasts and jammed her naked body into a garbage to bleed to death, far luckier than myriads of other white women and girls who’ve been raped and gang-raped by black males since her body and mind, unlike those of nearly all of the other white females, was tingling for days as she was gang-raped, vaginally and anally, for days by at least 5 black male criminals, rather than for minutes or at most a few hours.

    Your misogyny is so evil and insane it’s enough to sicken even many MRAs, the misogynist lunatics of the soi-disant “men’s movement.”

  114. @Art Deco
    @Honesthughgrant

    She wasn't. That part the reporter fabricated.

    As for Powell and Jeffords, both were Republicans because that was the line of least resistance at the time of their life when party affiliation came to matter. As for Whitman, she and her husband are standard issue northeastern patricians. They're not invested in any issue other than tax rates. People like that tend to dislike "big Jesus Christers", so the Southern, evangelical, and old-school Catholic elements in the Republican Party repel them.

    Replies: @res

    She wasn’t. That part the reporter fabricated.

    What makes you say that? I think the explanation given in the article (see my earlier comment) made sense.

    • Replies: @Art Deco
    @res

    What makes you say that?

    "Ms." Kelley Boorn (nee Crum) is 34 years old per White Pages Were she a 'lifelong Republican', she might have registered to vote in 2004. Which is to say that none of the discrete events which occurred during the period running from 2003 to 2006 which so damaged the Republican brand affected her in any manifest way. You'll recall that the youth population in 2000 was evenly split between the parties and the youth population in 2008 gave BO a 2-1 majority. Youths who register Republican are telling you that certain sentiments (what might be called 'the Official Idea') don't have any resonance with them. Yet, after 16 years of living, holding jobs, and coping with the day to day business of running a household, she regurgitates liberal tropes without any trace of originality, down to a reference to Fox News. (I'll bet the author thought of mentioning the Koch Brothers, but figured that would be too obvious). Her explanation of her attitudes make little sense. When you have contact with unfamiliar people, you may think better of them or worse of them depending on what your baseline is. About the least likely thing that happens is you start babbling like an idiot social work student; idiot social work students aren't making realistic appraisals of their social environment. You don't usually get dumber when you get more data. (I do know an idiot social worker who lived successively in Atlanta, Baltimore, and St. Louis; I suspect if you carefully questioned her elderly father, you'd discover she talked the same rot as a magnet school student 25 years ago. Her worldview is impervious to data, but not her housing choices. For the last five years, she's insisted on living in low-crime suburbs. It's For the Children).

    Here's $100 bucks on the table that if she actually were a registered Republican, she did so to keep her family off her back and she was never at home with it.

    Replies: @res

  115. @Abe

    Mr. Moore complained on his Facebook profile page about being forced to wear a mask at work, while Ms. Boorn put a Black Lives Matter sign on her car.
     
    Was on a Vietnam War reading kick about a year ago after watching the Ken Burns PBS documentary. Read the WE WERE WARRIORS... book upon which the Mel Gibson movie is based. A striking detail- as reinforcements were being helicoptered into the fire zone, a couple of reporters asked to tag along. OK, says an officer, so long as you strap on MR-15’s and are prepared to use them (chances are the reporters would have been shot at by VC even if UNARMED).

    Compare this to the caliber of millennial “reporting” required by this story- sit all day at a desk in an air-conditioned Manhattan office goofing off on monitoring Facebook, or Twitter, or TikTok. Dueling hashtags between some Ohio blue collar nobody and his status-striving stepdaughter hits your newscrawl. Bingo, you’ve got a national news story (holding the megaphone lets you decide when something ‘anecdotal’ becomes ‘emblematic’ and when something ‘emblematic’ becomes ‘iconic’), all without having to leave the complimentary-Avian water/wasabi-flavored soy bean packet perimeter of a NEW YORK TIMES office.

    Replies: @Cloudbuster, @Jim Bob Lassiter

    That’s priceless, like something from the plume of Tom Wolfe.

  116. @Jane Plain

    Boorn was apprehensive, worried about climate change, about what her sons were learning by growing up white in America. Now she is worried about the prospect of four more years with Mr. Trump in the White House.

     

    In short, she subscribes to the modern liberal pseudo-cult religion.

    “My husband and I both grew up in northeast Ohio and it’s rural,” she said. “There are people who are openly racist. Coming down to Columbus, we made friends with people of all colors and all religions and it’s so hard to tell people who don’t see that these are just people — it’s not what you see on Fox News.”
     
    A short stay in Kenosha might be educational.

    I feel sorry for her sons. They'll either grow up as broken shells of men or rebel entirely and end up on 4chan.

    Replies: @Art Deco, @Jane Plain

    You’re a sad case, Art Deco. You’re on ignore now.

  117. @Rosie
    @Pop Warner


    You’re wrong. I don’t want men to vote either.

    Our current state is the end result of the liberal democracy experiment that founded this republic. Liberals are nothing more than proto-bolsheviks, and it’s no surprise that the egalitarian mindset pushed by the Enlightenment finds its logical conclusion in communism with its absurd and unrealistic focus on “equality.” Centuries from now the concept of every adult having the vote will be seen as a curiosity from a bygone era where men went mad
     
    Disagree. If you will recall, the chant was not just Equality! It was Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity! Certain people who control our erstwhile democracy have used the first two and disallowed any appeal to the last one. The French Revolution was a nationalist movement. Napoleon turned it into something else, and modern cosmopolitan liberals are cut from that same universalist cloth.

    There is no conceivable system of government that will not succumb to determined subversives.

    Replies: @Jane Plain, @Pop Warner

    There is no conceivable system of government that will not succumb to determined subversives.

    True, that. The liberals love to quote Margaret Mead: ““Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed, citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.”

    I think you and she are saying the same thing, no?

    I would add, a charismatic leader. A small group of people (committed, thoughtful maybe, fanatic and crazed, maybe), plus a charismatic leader, to drag along a critical mass of normies.

  118. @BB753
    @throtler

    The poor children are too young to know better and the husband is either cucked or terrorised by the idea of divorce. Romance leads to marriage, and marriage with kids becomes perpetual servitude and humiliation for men under existing laws.

    Replies: @Jim Don Bob

    I wonder how many couples he had to interview before he found this ditz woman and her whipped husband. He, like so many other “journalists”, already had the story written. He just needed some bolstering quotes from real people in flyover country.

    • Replies: @Ghost of Bull Moose
    @Jim Don Bob

    These people are about as real as 0bama's composite girlfriends in 'Dreams of Oblahblah.'

    But as Joey Plugs said when he took a break from hiding his own Easter eggs, "we choose truth over facts."

    , @Alden
    @Jim Don Bob

    If indeed the couple really exists.

  119. @Dr. Doom
    Just saw a tweet by Rob Reiner. He says the Original Sin of America was SLAVERY.

    Sin? What does that word mean in their heathen tongue, one wonders?

    Ending slavery is probably the problem here though.

    There were many making many shekels on that trade.

    Marxism is slavery, but that's said to be good.

    Who/whom? Its all in the point of view.

    You can choose to feel guilty about ending slavery and fake "sins".

    But haven't you better things to do?

    Replies: @Jim Don Bob

    Rob Reiner was obviously perfectly cast as Meathead on the Archie Bunker show.

  120. @Rosie
    @Wyatt

    I have repeatedly refuted every talking point you list here. Nonetheless, I am a patient woman, so I will explain it again, but it will have to be in installments. Being a mother, I don't have time to write whole essays on these threads.

    I'll just start with your first paragraph. I'm going to assume, for the sake of argument, that everything you say here is true. None of that compares to the momentous destruction of Western civilization that has resulted from male greed.

    https://time.com/5343074/libre-koch-congress-immigration/

    There are literally hundreds of White male billionaires in the world. Not one of them will spend a nickel to defend their race. NOT EVEN ONE!

    Find me a male billionaire financier and I'll get heels on the ground right quick.

    https://psmag.com/.image/c_fit%2Ccs_srgb%2Cfl_progressive%2Cq_auto:good%2Cw_620/MTU0Nzg4MDgwODc0Njk0MDg2/mothersofmassive_frontcover_tsb1wg.jpg

    Replies: @Abe, @Wyatt

    Still not 100% sure you’re really a woman, but to unparaphrase Wise Latina Supreme Court Justice’s bowdlerization of a genuinely wise proverb, “a wise old man and wise old woman will come to the same judgment”.

    I started watching the jock-sniffing Michael Jordan documentary LAST DANCE during my workouts recently despite my better judgement. There is a segment early on where Jordan disavows any involvement in mid-80’s Bulls “traveling cocaine circus” antics, saying that as an NBA rookie he was content merely to hang out in his apartment, drink milk, watch movies, and writer letters back home to his North Carolina big black momma, at which point I burst out laughing, thinking what a shame the upright and continent Jordan ran into that bad seed Tiger Woods, who proceeded to hopelessly compromise him with hookers, drugs, and gambling.

    The point being, there is still such a market for American males’ pathetic, juvenile sports celebrity hero-worship (one tiny aspect of which is keeping Jordan forever the same SPACE JAMMIN’ teddybear he once and will always be in the minds of millions of impressionable 30-something American men-children) that even “conservative” men of dazzling wealth and influence like T. Boone Pickens, Jerry Jones, etc. instead of doing something meaningful with it, just funnel it back into what is effectively the Great American jogga/white coed rape pipeline.

    • Replies: @Rosie
    @Abe


    Still not 100% sure you’re really a woman, but to unparaphrase Wise Latina Supreme Court Justice’s bowdlerization of a genuinely wise proverb, “a wise old man and wise old woman will come to the same judgment”.
     
    Lol. Yes, there are various opinions about this, but yes, I'm definitely a woman.

    Replies: @Abe, @bruce county

    , @Steve Sailer
    @Abe

    I've never heard of a rumor of Michael Jordan doing cocaine while he was with the Bulls. His performance was so consistently strong that you can't see in his stats any time he might have been dragged down by cocaine, the way you can see in the stats of Tim Raines or Keith Hernandez.

    Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease

  121. @Abe
    @Rosie

    Still not 100% sure you’re really a woman, but to unparaphrase Wise Latina Supreme Court Justice’s bowdlerization of a genuinely wise proverb, “a wise old man and wise old woman will come to the same judgment”.

    I started watching the jock-sniffing Michael Jordan documentary LAST DANCE during my workouts recently despite my better judgement. There is a segment early on where Jordan disavows any involvement in mid-80’s Bulls “traveling cocaine circus” antics, saying that as an NBA rookie he was content merely to hang out in his apartment, drink milk, watch movies, and writer letters back home to his North Carolina big black momma, at which point I burst out laughing, thinking what a shame the upright and continent Jordan ran into that bad seed Tiger Woods, who proceeded to hopelessly compromise him with hookers, drugs, and gambling.

    The point being, there is still such a market for American males’ pathetic, juvenile sports celebrity hero-worship (one tiny aspect of which is keeping Jordan forever the same SPACE JAMMIN’ teddybear he once and will always be in the minds of millions of impressionable 30-something American men-children) that even “conservative” men of dazzling wealth and influence like T. Boone Pickens, Jerry Jones, etc. instead of doing something meaningful with it, just funnel it back into what is effectively the Great American jogga/white coed rape pipeline.

    Replies: @Rosie, @Steve Sailer

    Still not 100% sure you’re really a woman, but to unparaphrase Wise Latina Supreme Court Justice’s bowdlerization of a genuinely wise proverb, “a wise old man and wise old woman will come to the same judgment”.

    Lol. Yes, there are various opinions about this, but yes, I’m definitely a woman.

    • Replies: @Abe
    @Rosie


    Lol. Yes, there are various opinions about this, but yes, I’m definitely a woman.
     
    Thanks for not taking offense. As Steve has pointed out, on the Internet anyone can be a hot, lesbian Syrian warblogger-

    https://isteve.blogspot.com/2011/06/hot-lesbian-arab-martyr-blogger-turns.html
    , @bruce county
    @Rosie

    Rosie you're okay in my books... Don't let the intimidated bother you.

  122. @res
    @Art Deco


    She wasn’t. That part the reporter fabricated.
     
    What makes you say that? I think the explanation given in the article (see my earlier comment) made sense.

    Replies: @Art Deco

    What makes you say that?

    “Ms.” Kelley Boorn (nee Crum) is 34 years old per White Pages Were she a ‘lifelong Republican’, she might have registered to vote in 2004. Which is to say that none of the discrete events which occurred during the period running from 2003 to 2006 which so damaged the Republican brand affected her in any manifest way. You’ll recall that the youth population in 2000 was evenly split between the parties and the youth population in 2008 gave BO a 2-1 majority. Youths who register Republican are telling you that certain sentiments (what might be called ‘the Official Idea’) don’t have any resonance with them. Yet, after 16 years of living, holding jobs, and coping with the day to day business of running a household, she regurgitates liberal tropes without any trace of originality, down to a reference to Fox News. (I’ll bet the author thought of mentioning the Koch Brothers, but figured that would be too obvious). Her explanation of her attitudes make little sense. When you have contact with unfamiliar people, you may think better of them or worse of them depending on what your baseline is. About the least likely thing that happens is you start babbling like an idiot social work student; idiot social work students aren’t making realistic appraisals of their social environment. You don’t usually get dumber when you get more data. (I do know an idiot social worker who lived successively in Atlanta, Baltimore, and St. Louis; I suspect if you carefully questioned her elderly father, you’d discover she talked the same rot as a magnet school student 25 years ago. Her worldview is impervious to data, but not her housing choices. For the last five years, she’s insisted on living in low-crime suburbs. It’s For the Children).

    Here’s $100 bucks on the table that if she actually were a registered Republican, she did so to keep her family off her back and she was never at home with it.

    • Replies: @res
    @Art Deco

    Thanks for the thoughtful reply.

    I still think the pro-life true believer who changed her mind after a difficult pregnancy narrative is believable. Perhaps I am gullible though. Did you read that excerpt?

    She comes across as a true believer who changed religions. Hence all of the liberal tropes now.

    Did you see any sign her family pressured her to be Republican? The article says her stepfather voted for Obama twice.

    I do agree she was probably never at home being a Republican. She was just one because of abortion.

    P.S. I do agree the convenience of all of this as a narrative is striking and cause for some skepticism.

    Replies: @Art Deco

  123. @Rosie
    @Pop Warner


    You’re wrong. I don’t want men to vote either.

    Our current state is the end result of the liberal democracy experiment that founded this republic. Liberals are nothing more than proto-bolsheviks, and it’s no surprise that the egalitarian mindset pushed by the Enlightenment finds its logical conclusion in communism with its absurd and unrealistic focus on “equality.” Centuries from now the concept of every adult having the vote will be seen as a curiosity from a bygone era where men went mad
     
    Disagree. If you will recall, the chant was not just Equality! It was Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity! Certain people who control our erstwhile democracy have used the first two and disallowed any appeal to the last one. The French Revolution was a nationalist movement. Napoleon turned it into something else, and modern cosmopolitan liberals are cut from that same universalist cloth.

    There is no conceivable system of government that will not succumb to determined subversives.

    Replies: @Jane Plain, @Pop Warner

    The French Revolution was a Satanic movement, no different from the Bolshevik coup in Russia. The revolutionaries were nothing more than mass murderers deluded by revenge fantasies and lust for power. They lost all credibility when their brutality exceeded that of the Ancien Regime they overthrew. I spit on the notion of Liberty and Equality, equality is something that only exists in the legal realm. There is no equality in nature, only equilibrium achieved through hierarchy.

    • Agree: Anonymousse
    • Replies: @Rosie
    @Pop Warner


    I spit on the notion of Liberty and Equality, equality is something that only exists in the legal realm. There is no equality in nature, only equilibrium achieved through hierarchy.
     
    I see. You're pro-hierarchy, and you justify this by appeal to the naturalistic fallacy.

    I'm just pro-White. Of course we don't see eye to eye.
    , @Alden
    @Pop Warner

    Agree with you about the French Revolution. You’re absolutely right. It was more a property grab like the English reformation than a satanic plot though.

  124. @Rosie
    @Abe


    Still not 100% sure you’re really a woman, but to unparaphrase Wise Latina Supreme Court Justice’s bowdlerization of a genuinely wise proverb, “a wise old man and wise old woman will come to the same judgment”.
     
    Lol. Yes, there are various opinions about this, but yes, I'm definitely a woman.

    Replies: @Abe, @bruce county

    Lol. Yes, there are various opinions about this, but yes, I’m definitely a woman.

    Thanks for not taking offense. As Steve has pointed out, on the Internet anyone can be a hot, lesbian Syrian warblogger-

    https://isteve.blogspot.com/2011/06/hot-lesbian-arab-martyr-blogger-turns.html

  125. @Roderick Spode
    @JohnnyWalker123


    Back during WWII, Nazis conquered France. Some French chose to collaborate, forming the pro-govt Vichy govt. Some French fought back, forming the French Resistance. Those in the Vichy govt were “allies” of Germans, helping them to persecute the French Resistance.
     
    I'm yawning over here. The Vichy government was the real French Resistance, facing off against the real occupying (((power))) for which the "French Resistance" were useful idiots.

    Replies: @Muggles

    >>I’m yawning over here. The Vichy government was the real French Resistance, facing off against the real occupying (((power))) for which the “French Resistance” were useful idiots.<<

    Normally I don't do ad hominem replies here. But this is sick.

    No one in France, other than a handful of jihadi "refugees," would agree with you.

    That Hitler worship disease you have is classic Stage 4 dementia.

    Likewise for your "fans" here.

    • Replies: @Roderick Spode
    @Muggles

    Not so: JMLP is still alive. Respect the eyepatch.

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CE-AdCsXIAIfg-9.jpg:large

    , @BB753
    @Muggles

    Pétain was no Hitler. He wasn't even a fascist, more like a Catholic reactionary like Francisco Franco. He just decided to safeguard whatever was left of France's sovereignty but also chose the losing side of the war, unlike boot-licker de Gaulle who chose the winning side: the US and the USSR. Everybody else lost that war, including Great Britain.
    Let's not forget that America had been supporting the bolsheviks since 1904, and that there wouldn't have been a USRR without the financial and industrial support of the USA since 1917. After 1945, the US and the Soviet Union continued a long charade called the Cold War, which was mostly for show, as they divided the remains of Europe's former colonies between themselves as spoils of war and also the prized metropolises, to become their puppet client states.
    In war, there are no good guys, not even your own guys.

    Replies: @Muggles

  126. @Rosie
    @Wyatt

    I have repeatedly refuted every talking point you list here. Nonetheless, I am a patient woman, so I will explain it again, but it will have to be in installments. Being a mother, I don't have time to write whole essays on these threads.

    I'll just start with your first paragraph. I'm going to assume, for the sake of argument, that everything you say here is true. None of that compares to the momentous destruction of Western civilization that has resulted from male greed.

    https://time.com/5343074/libre-koch-congress-immigration/

    There are literally hundreds of White male billionaires in the world. Not one of them will spend a nickel to defend their race. NOT EVEN ONE!

    Find me a male billionaire financier and I'll get heels on the ground right quick.

    https://psmag.com/.image/c_fit%2Ccs_srgb%2Cfl_progressive%2Cq_auto:good%2Cw_620/MTU0Nzg4MDgwODc0Njk0MDg2/mothersofmassive_frontcover_tsb1wg.jpg

    Replies: @Abe, @Wyatt

    Rosie, how many of those male billionaires are jewish? Because when I look at destructive billionaires, I notice that most of them are jewish and the few who are even close to decent are definitely not jewish, i.e., Elon Musk and Peter Thiel. At the very least, they push for more right wing values. No one is allowed to have pro-white values openly. A black man can’t even appeal to the center without getting harangued by the left.

    Further, there are only a handful of female billionaires (virtually all of them wealthy only because of entrepreneurial male relatives) and all of the ones I found are left wing and shit. At the very least, Bill Gates has sterilized a bunch of Africans. It doesn’t directly benefit whites, but the world isn’t smarting from a lack of blacks.

    The fact of the matter is that women have served as the fodder for leftist and neo-con movements that have undermined western civilization. We saw how the principally male fascist and socialist movements of the former half of the 20th century rose and fell, but the countries they dominated survived. The social-justice movements, white guilt industry and academic brainwashing institutions have become more and more dominated by women as time has gone on. Likewise, they’ve gotten shittier, more bold faced and vile as time has gone on.

    It’s like I said. The principle value of women in a movement is the clockwork destruction they bring to that movement. The left is in the early stages of its own death and its because of the sheer volume of female bodies being fed into the revolutionary grinder. So far, the nationalist movements are on the rise and the lack of women has left them still capable of rising.

    • Replies: @Rosie
    @Wyatt


    Rosie, how many of those male billionaires are jewish?

     

    How many of the "White women" you see at BLM protests are Jewish? You don't know, do you, Wyatt?

    No one is allowed to have pro-white values openly.
     
    Billionaires aren't "allowed" to be pro-White? Who exactly won't allow it, Wyatt? And why do you insist on antagonizing women when you yourself admit the real source of the problem?


    So far, the nationalist movements are on the rise and the lack of women has left them still capable of rising.
     
    Lol my achin' sides. The alt-Right is totally defunct, thanks to a bunch of White male police officers who refused to defend other White men's right to freedom of speech.

    Meanwhile, in Europe, nationalist men are puzzled by the American movement's misogyny.

    Replies: @Wyatt

    , @Rosie
    @Wyatt

    Half of the Forbes 400 are White. What is your excuse for them, Wyatt?

    http://racehist.blogspot.com/2013/04/2012-forbes-400-by-ethnic-origins.html

    I know it's hard for you to face the facts, but the White man is an individualist, and it may be the end of us.

  127. @Wyatt
    @Rosie

    That's not what he said. When you look back at the history of leftist movements in the United States, you will see blacks, jews and women. When you look at the modern Democratic Party in the US complaining about whites and the west, you see blacks, jews and women. Those three groups are principally responsible for the social and political agitation that has rotted America. In the case of blacks and women, it's easy to get them to buy into oppression narratives because it makes them feel good about themselves to believe something without actually having done anything.

    Haven't you noticed all the box wine bitches who think their Twitter activism counts for anything? What about all the screechy cunts who put themselves front and center during the riots? Women are actually part of the reason that reactionary conservative is so strong. When someone like Charlie Kirk or Ben Shapiro "destroys a liberal with facts and logic" the most pitiful of liberals are the women. The guys will come up and either be raging dicks or sometimes be sensible, but the women are always mousy, they never address statistics and always rely on their feelings to guide their opinions. And yet, despite this lacking sense of reality, they will always be the most narcissistic and condescending. They are the ones who motivate people to hate the left because they're so far removed from reality.

    And that's the one good thing about the left being so thoroughly entrenched with women because women moving into anything inevitably decays the environment.

    This happened in the military with reduced physical standards and handholding for recruits.
    This happened in gaming when the feminists decided to peddle their grift.
    This happened in Occupy Wall Street when gender bullshit entered the fray.
    This happened in Congress with bitches like Mazie Hirono telling men to sit down and shut up.
    This happened in academia as female social science professors started popping up like cancer polyps and infecting kids.
    This happens with feminists who try to make all female companies and watch all their work be burned to the ground by catfighting. Coincidentally, this also happens with blacks who try to uplift the ghettos. Once shot at, twice shy. Speaking of, can I interest you in this aptly named song?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woman_Is_the_Nigger_of_the_World

    Whines about white men? Check.
    Complains endlessly about oppression? Check.
    Wants government handouts? Check.
    Wants to do the hard, dirty jobs nobody else wants? Shiiiiiiieeeeeeet

    Seriously, where can you point to that women have made a tremendous benefit through their inclusion? I can point to a hundred where their inclusion caused a decline. Also, if women didn't vote in the 2016 election, Trump would have won still. Hell, he would have won by greater margins.

    Replies: @Rosie, @Reg Cæsar, @Rosie

    Haven’t you noticed all the box wine bitches who think their Twitter activism counts for anything? What about all the screechy cunts who put themselves front and center during the riots? Women are actually part of the reason that reactionary conservative is so strong. When someone like Charlie Kirk or Ben Shapiro “destroys a liberal with facts and logic” the most pitiful of liberals are the women. The guys will come up and either be raging dicks or sometimes be sensible, but the women are always mousy, they never address statistics and always rely on their feelings to guide their opinions. And yet, despite this lacking sense of reality, they will always be the most narcissistic and condescending. They are the ones who motivate people to hate the left because they’re so far removed from reality.

    Moving on. Here you mention statistics, but fail to vote any in support of your own screed. Indeed, there is nothing factual in this whole paragraph. It’s just vague impressions and unfalsifiable anecdotes.

    And that’s the one good thing about the left being so thoroughly entrenched with women because women moving into anything inevitably decays the environment.

    So you say.

    This happened in the military with reduced physical standards and handholding for recruits.
    This happened in gaming when the feminists decided to peddle their grift.
    This happened in Occupy Wall Street when gender bullshit entered the fray.

    These are all very contextual issues, and given the fact that I’m not in the military, a gamer, or involved in radical political movements, I am not in a position to opine one way or another. I will say that your claim implies that men are literally incapable of being fair. They can only either exclude or indulge, nothing in between. Since you feel free to share your impressions, I’ll share mine. I have moved a great deal in Male-dominated environments in my life, and generally been treated very graciously and fairly, though sometimes after a bit of hazing. Nor have I ever expected any sort of special treatment. I would consider it an insult.

    This happened in academia as female social science professors started popping up like cancer polyps and infecting kids.

    What do you mean “kids”? I thought men were immune to academic brainwashing?

    In any event, where is your evidence that women are responsible for leftist dominance in the social sciences? One could argue that modern-day racial egalitarianism started with a male Swedish economist.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/An_American_Dilemma

    Obviously, one man doesn’t prove anything one way or the other, but how many tenured White male academics, or even retirees, are there in this country? Tens of thousands? And how many will speak up against political correctness? You can count them on one hand. KMac, Rushton, Duchesne. Go ahead. How many can you think of?

    This happens with feminists who try to make all female companies and watch all their work be burned to the ground by catfighting.

    It’s illegal to discriminate on the basis of sex, so I don’t know where you’re getting this from. Details, please.

    To be continued…

  128. @Art Deco
    @res

    What makes you say that?

    "Ms." Kelley Boorn (nee Crum) is 34 years old per White Pages Were she a 'lifelong Republican', she might have registered to vote in 2004. Which is to say that none of the discrete events which occurred during the period running from 2003 to 2006 which so damaged the Republican brand affected her in any manifest way. You'll recall that the youth population in 2000 was evenly split between the parties and the youth population in 2008 gave BO a 2-1 majority. Youths who register Republican are telling you that certain sentiments (what might be called 'the Official Idea') don't have any resonance with them. Yet, after 16 years of living, holding jobs, and coping with the day to day business of running a household, she regurgitates liberal tropes without any trace of originality, down to a reference to Fox News. (I'll bet the author thought of mentioning the Koch Brothers, but figured that would be too obvious). Her explanation of her attitudes make little sense. When you have contact with unfamiliar people, you may think better of them or worse of them depending on what your baseline is. About the least likely thing that happens is you start babbling like an idiot social work student; idiot social work students aren't making realistic appraisals of their social environment. You don't usually get dumber when you get more data. (I do know an idiot social worker who lived successively in Atlanta, Baltimore, and St. Louis; I suspect if you carefully questioned her elderly father, you'd discover she talked the same rot as a magnet school student 25 years ago. Her worldview is impervious to data, but not her housing choices. For the last five years, she's insisted on living in low-crime suburbs. It's For the Children).

    Here's $100 bucks on the table that if she actually were a registered Republican, she did so to keep her family off her back and she was never at home with it.

    Replies: @res

    Thanks for the thoughtful reply.

    I still think the pro-life true believer who changed her mind after a difficult pregnancy narrative is believable. Perhaps I am gullible though. Did you read that excerpt?

    She comes across as a true believer who changed religions. Hence all of the liberal tropes now.

    Did you see any sign her family pressured her to be Republican? The article says her stepfather voted for Obama twice.

    I do agree she was probably never at home being a Republican. She was just one because of abortion.

    P.S. I do agree the convenience of all of this as a narrative is striking and cause for some skepticism.

    • Replies: @Art Deco
    @res

    I still think the pro-life true believer who changed her mind after a difficult pregnancy narrative is believable.

    ???

  129. Trump’s approval per Rasmussen is higher than Obama’s at this point in their respective reigns:

    https://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/trump_administration/prez_track_aug24

    The gap is only three % pts., though. It’s been higher this summer. They keep trading places.

    • Replies: @bruce county
    @Reg Cæsar

    Not like Trump is going to save us but I hope that carries into Nov.
    The world is watching the crazy.
    Stay safe Reg.

    , @Corvinus
    @Reg Cæsar

    That poll skews conservative. So it’s other than surprising with the results.

    But most polls do have a political bent to it.

    Ever since 2016, I don’t put much stock into it. For example, Trump can definitely win in states where he is behind.

    Although, he says if he doesn’t, then he was cheated. If he wins, there was no cheating. That is nuts!

    He and his supporters have already wrote the narrative and have the playbook to put into place if he loses.

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar

  130. Flash forward, mother of the boys is killed by her sons, when the sons became aware of how she had squandered their future for political correctness points.

    • LOL: bruce county
  131. @HallParvey
    @The Germ Theory of Disease


    Nope, starts with a J, always does.

     

    Jesus?

    Replies: @SaneClownPosse

    Jesus was a Jew. So, yes.

  132. @HammerJack
    @Mr. Anon

    Speaking of immigrants and the NYT

    https://i.ibb.co/k4cFdkd/Capture-2020-08-24-02-15-17-2.png

    https://mol.im/a/8656465

    Replies: @HammerJack, @Mr. Peabody, @Dan Hayes, @Cloudbuster, @Anon 2, @Ma Laoshi

    Eichenwald’s outburst against Melania Trump is in the same category as
    the rage Einstein’s parents felt when they found out that Einstein was
    about to marry a Slavic woman – Mileva Marić

  133. This hysterical azzhat woman says Northeast Ohio is “rural”?

    Uh, that’s where Cleveland, Akron, Canton, and Youngstown are located.

    • Replies: @Art Deco
    @AceDeuce

    She apparently grew up in exurbs around Youngstown. Canfield and Newton Falls. These are small urban knots, not countryside.

  134. @BB753
    @throtler

    Thanks for the laugh! I'm not a mysoginist, I just believe women belong home raising the children and doing housekeeping. Is there a higher calling than that?

    https://youtu.be/J7X1TwsaIN8

    Replies: @Steve in Greensboro

    You believe that women belong home raising children. I believe that also. And it happens to be the truth.

    Feminism is for fat, ugly women who don’t bathe.

    • Replies: @BB753
    @Steve in Greensboro

    Alas, feminism has become the norm for 99.99 % of women, ugly or beautiful, thin or fat, un bathed or otherwise!

  135. @The Alarmist

    Last week Ms. Boorn watched most of the virtual Democratic National Convention.
     
    In laymans’ terms, mind-numbed robot.

    I need more information before deciding whether this is ICD-10 F22.0 or F70 or both.

    Replies: @jo shmo

    Last week Ms. Boorn watched most of the virtual Democratic National Convention.

    This statement makes question whether the whole article.

    The DNC had very very few views. Anyone who watched most of it is a reporter or a dem operative or a freak of nature. So, none of the above is anywhere near the american citizen average.

    • Agree: YetAnotherAnon
    • Replies: @Justvisiting
    @jo shmo

    Watching most of the Democratic National Convention would require an IQ significantly below room temperature.

    I don't know a dog or cat that could tolerate that glossolalia.

  136. @Achmed E. Newman
    @Daniel H

    A needle and a spoon, and a trip to the moon...

    Sorry, Daniel, this is not any argument or agreement, but your one sentence brought back an old memory of Lynyrd Skynyrd:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_RUs6UBm_AY

    Replies: @bruce county

    The first Skynard album I ever bought was the live “One More (For) From The Road… Live at the Fox Theater.
    Incredible..Sounded amazing on my little Dynaco tube amp over my Altec Lansing A7-500’s Votts..

    I’m as hot as a fox in a forest fire…

    • Replies: @Ben tillman
    @bruce county

    Same here. I bought Second Helping later, but the version of this song I so frequently listened too while lifting weights in my bedroom as a 14/15-year-old was from that live album.

    Replies: @bruce county

  137. @res
    @Art Deco

    Thanks for the thoughtful reply.

    I still think the pro-life true believer who changed her mind after a difficult pregnancy narrative is believable. Perhaps I am gullible though. Did you read that excerpt?

    She comes across as a true believer who changed religions. Hence all of the liberal tropes now.

    Did you see any sign her family pressured her to be Republican? The article says her stepfather voted for Obama twice.

    I do agree she was probably never at home being a Republican. She was just one because of abortion.

    P.S. I do agree the convenience of all of this as a narrative is striking and cause for some skepticism.

    Replies: @Art Deco

    I still think the pro-life true believer who changed her mind after a difficult pregnancy narrative is believable.

    ???

  138. @Reg Cæsar
    Trump's approval per Rasmussen is higher than Obama's at this point in their respective reigns:


    https://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/trump_administration/prez_track_aug24

    The gap is only three % pts., though. It's been higher this summer. They keep trading places.

    Replies: @bruce county, @Corvinus

    Not like Trump is going to save us but I hope that carries into Nov.
    The world is watching the crazy.
    Stay safe Reg.

    • Agree: Ben tillman
  139. @Rosie
    @Abe


    Still not 100% sure you’re really a woman, but to unparaphrase Wise Latina Supreme Court Justice’s bowdlerization of a genuinely wise proverb, “a wise old man and wise old woman will come to the same judgment”.
     
    Lol. Yes, there are various opinions about this, but yes, I'm definitely a woman.

    Replies: @Abe, @bruce county

    Rosie you’re okay in my books… Don’t let the intimidated bother you.

    • Thanks: Rosie
  140. @AceDeuce
    This hysterical azzhat woman says Northeast Ohio is "rural"?

    Uh, that's where Cleveland, Akron, Canton, and Youngstown are located.

    Replies: @Art Deco

    She apparently grew up in exurbs around Youngstown. Canfield and Newton Falls. These are small urban knots, not countryside.

  141. @JohnnyWalker123

    NYT: Biden-Voting Mom Worries Her 3 White Sons, Ages 8, 5, and 1, Have Too Much White Privilege

     

    No. That's not correct.

    Read what she said.

    “It’s hard raising white men in America,” she said of her three boys, ages 8, 5 and 16 months. “You want to understand that they understand their position as an ally.”

     

    If you read between the lines, here's what she's saying.

    -Non-Whites (especially Blacks) are gaining the upper hand in America and ascending to power.
    -Whites (especially White males) are on the losing side of a Civil War.
    -This White mom wants her young White sons to become abandon their losing team (Team White) and join the winning team (Team Non-White).
    -By becoming an "ally" of Team Non-White, her sons can survive and thrive in this new social order. Meanwhile, more traditional Whites will be marginalized, both socially and economically.

    To put it more simply, this mom wants to throw other White people under the bus, in the process enriching herself and her sons. She's declaring that her family are "Good Whites" who should be given cool jobs and be allowed to live in peace. If the protesters want to harass and beat up anyone, they should target "Bad Whites."

    This woman isn't attacking her sons. This woman is attacking YOUR sons.

    The White sled is being pursued by a pack of hungry Black wolves. So this woman is throwing YOUR sons out to be torn to pieces, sparing her own progeny.

    Back during WWII, Nazis conquered France. Some French chose to collaborate, forming the pro-govt Vichy govt. Some French fought back, forming the French Resistance. Those in the Vichy govt were "allies" of Germans, helping them to persecute the French Resistance. In return, French Vichy "allies" were allowed to live their live in peace and prosperity.

    In today's America, Jews and Blacks are Nazis. White Democrats and White Cuckservative are supporters of the Vichy regime. Trump supporters are the French resistance.

    This mom is declaring she wants her sons to grow up to be supporters of the Vichy regime, as it's the most pragmatic choice.

    During WWII (2020), a Nazi (Jewish) news columnist wrote an an interesting article in the Das Reich newspaper (New York Times). The Nazi (Jew) favorably portrayed a Vichy collaborationist (woke White Democrat) mother, while spitting vitriol at her stepfather, who's a supporter of the French Resistance (anti-PC Conservatism).

    Replies: @Anon, @RichardTaylor, @Roderick Spode, @Lowe, @Rosie, @Ghost of Bull Moose, @Corvinus, @Libre

    No, you are projecting your own thoughts onto her and insisting it is her position. Basically, you are speculating. Last time I checked, that doesn’t mean something is objectively true.

  142. @Reg Cæsar
    Trump's approval per Rasmussen is higher than Obama's at this point in their respective reigns:


    https://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/trump_administration/prez_track_aug24

    The gap is only three % pts., though. It's been higher this summer. They keep trading places.

    Replies: @bruce county, @Corvinus

    That poll skews conservative. So it’s other than surprising with the results.

    But most polls do have a political bent to it.

    Ever since 2016, I don’t put much stock into it. For example, Trump can definitely win in states where he is behind.

    Although, he says if he doesn’t, then he was cheated. If he wins, there was no cheating. That is nuts!

    He and his supporters have already wrote the narrative and have the playbook to put into place if he loses.

    • Troll: YetAnotherAnon
    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    @Corvinus


    Although, he says if he doesn’t, then he was cheated. If he wins, there was no cheating. That is nuts!
     
    No different from Team Gore in 2000. (Or was it 2001?) If Al had pulled ahead by one vote on, say, the 137th recount, they would have deemed any 138th recount invalid before it got started.

    Replies: @Corvinus

  143. @Abe
    @Cloudbuster


    What’s an MR-15?
     
    Sorry, typo/autocorrect- AR-15 aka M-16 - I think it was still even called the AR-15 at the time of the Battle of Ia Drang depicted in the book/movie (my iPhone, BTW, ever so unhelpfully auto-suggests “Orientalism” then fights me all the way when I want to text my wife about getting some Applebees “Oriental Chicken Salad”)

    Replies: @Joe Stalin

    Sorry, typo/autocorrect- AR-15 aka M-16 – I think it was still even called the AR-15 at the time of the Battle of Ia Drang depicted in the book/movie

    […] took place November 14–16, 1965 at LZ X-Ray, located at the eastern foot of the Chu Pong Massif in the central highlands of Vietnam.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Ia_Drang

    First Mass Issued AR-15

    The Brownells XBRN16E1® Rifle replicates the design of the first AR-15 to be issued in mass numbers to US Army on the ground in Vietnam.

    The XM16E1 was adopted by the US Army in 1963 and was issued to troops in 1965. It was the first rifle to feature the now prominent forward assist, and had other features that would lead to the M16A1. The XM16E1 was the first model also with the classic black triangle handguard, and prominently featured a 3 prong flash hider at the muzzle. This was also the last US issued AR-15 type rifle to include some variants with chrome bolt carrier groups.

    https://www.brownells.com/.aspx/bapid=616/ClientPage/brownells-16e1

    Retro XM16E1 rifles if you need an AR for fun.

    https://www.brownells.com/.aspx/bapid=616/ClientPage/brownells-16e1

    https://cdn-fsly.yottaa.net/53ff2f503c881650e20004c9/www.brownells.com/v~4b.10f/userdocs/Miscellaneous/brownells-retro-rifle-line/xbrn16e1u/gallery/078-000-401c.jpg?yocs=p_

    • Replies: @nokangaroos
    @Joe Stalin

    The actual AR15 had no forward assist and 1-in-14in. rifling twist (changed to 1-in-12 on the M-16 which ruined the major sales point, the TTE M-193 i.e. the bullets no longer tumbled on impact). Only a few thousand were issued to Air Force and Special Forces; it´s a bit like the AK-47 - not too many were made with the milled receiver (the Chinese sell replicas though), and the stamped is called AKM :D

  144. @The Germ Theory of Disease
    @Anonymous

    Nope, starts with a J, always does. Do you ever, ever, ever hear a J weeping and bemoaning excessive J privilege? And a guilty mandate to investigate and condemn J privilege? Ever?

    If you poke around these things long enough, this relentless assault on white people, you always mysteriously start to find J after J after J backstage.

    Funny how that works.

    Replies: @HallParvey, @ben tillman, @vinteuil

    Do you ever, ever, ever hear a J weeping and bemoaning excessive J privilege?

    No.

    Good on them.

    • Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease
    @vinteuil

    "Good on them."

    OK, so you agree with step one.

    I'm guessing you're smart enough to also suss out steps two through umpty-zillion, but it would be gratifying to see you articulate it on your own speed, and not make me step it out.

  145. @Jim Don Bob
    @BB753

    I wonder how many couples he had to interview before he found this ditz woman and her whipped husband. He, like so many other "journalists", already had the story written. He just needed some bolstering quotes from real people in flyover country.

    Replies: @Ghost of Bull Moose, @Alden

    These people are about as real as 0bama’s composite girlfriends in ‘Dreams of Oblahblah.’

    But as Joey Plugs said when he took a break from hiding his own Easter eggs, “we choose truth over facts.”

  146. @Wyatt
    @Rosie

    Rosie, how many of those male billionaires are jewish? Because when I look at destructive billionaires, I notice that most of them are jewish and the few who are even close to decent are definitely not jewish, i.e., Elon Musk and Peter Thiel. At the very least, they push for more right wing values. No one is allowed to have pro-white values openly. A black man can't even appeal to the center without getting harangued by the left.

    Further, there are only a handful of female billionaires (virtually all of them wealthy only because of entrepreneurial male relatives) and all of the ones I found are left wing and shit. At the very least, Bill Gates has sterilized a bunch of Africans. It doesn't directly benefit whites, but the world isn't smarting from a lack of blacks.

    The fact of the matter is that women have served as the fodder for leftist and neo-con movements that have undermined western civilization. We saw how the principally male fascist and socialist movements of the former half of the 20th century rose and fell, but the countries they dominated survived. The social-justice movements, white guilt industry and academic brainwashing institutions have become more and more dominated by women as time has gone on. Likewise, they've gotten shittier, more bold faced and vile as time has gone on.

    It's like I said. The principle value of women in a movement is the clockwork destruction they bring to that movement. The left is in the early stages of its own death and its because of the sheer volume of female bodies being fed into the revolutionary grinder. So far, the nationalist movements are on the rise and the lack of women has left them still capable of rising.

    Replies: @Rosie, @Rosie

    Rosie, how many of those male billionaires are jewish?

    How many of the “White women” you see at BLM protests are Jewish? You don’t know, do you, Wyatt?

    No one is allowed to have pro-white values openly.

    Billionaires aren’t “allowed” to be pro-White? Who exactly won’t allow it, Wyatt? And why do you insist on antagonizing women when you yourself admit the real source of the problem?

    So far, the nationalist movements are on the rise and the lack of women has left them still capable of rising.

    Lol my achin’ sides. The alt-Right is totally defunct, thanks to a bunch of White male police officers who refused to defend other White men’s right to freedom of speech.

    Meanwhile, in Europe, nationalist men are puzzled by the American movement’s misogyny.

    • Replies: @Wyatt
    @Rosie


    How many of the “White women” you see at BLM protests are Jewish? You don’t know, do you, Wyatt?
     
    Non-sequitur. The contention you made was that billionaires are the persons of importance and that they need to be acting. BLM is just the latest in a series of movements designed to destabilize the United States. Individual jews marching in it will do fuck all, but billionaire Jewish backers like George Soros have a massive impact.

    Billionaires aren’t “allowed” to be pro-White? Who exactly won’t allow it, Wyatt? And why do you insist on antagonizing women when you yourself admit the real source of the problem?
     

    Half of the Forbes 400 are White. What is your excuse for them, Wyatt?

    http://racehist.blogspot.com/2013/04/2012-forbes-400-by-ethnic-origins.html

    I know it’s hard for you to face the facts, but the White man is an individualist, and it may be the end of us.
     
    Usual suspects. ADL, SPLC and the media. Iowa Rep. Steve King was thoroughly ruined by a media blitz and pressure from the Jewish watchdog groups just for saying that America's young can't be replaced by other people. Any person with a semblance of power who openly advocates for white people or white interests will be systematically ruined. Even tangential support for unity (as in the case of Terry Crews advocating neutrality and reconciliation) results in backlash. The situation in America has become so hostile to white interest that anyone, especially powerful people, will be shut down at all costs, even if it means violating basic rights of free speech.


    Women are one of the Jewish golems. Like blacks, it's terribly easy to convince them of their own victimhood, their own tragedy and their entitlement to other people's wealth. Women don't bring much to movements beyond momentum. The detriments they do bring with them (pettiness, self-importance, Queen Bee behavior) is often lethal to movements. Internet atheism was big about a decade ago but surprise surprise, women introduced themselves into the movement, redubbed it Atheism Plus and the movement died for the aforementioned reasons.

    Ask yourself this: among all the important discourse you've seen regarding white nationalism, the most effective speech to convince whites of the imminent danger they face, how much of that has come from women? How many people do you think have been redpilled on Jews by women?

    Women don't make movements to serve a greater purpose. They make and enter movements to serve themselves. Gamergate showed that was the case with multiple game journalist women trying to shut down gaming to protect a whore. Intersectional feminism showed that was the case with useless, well paid feminists latching onto other people's movements to stay relevant.

    Can you tell me what it is that women could bring to an ethno-nationalist movement? Do you know of any women who could even make a convincing argument to someone on the fence, much less humiliate a soc-prog retard on a public stage? I can tell you all the problems women have brought to prior movements, but there's enough condescension coming from you that I think you're more concerned about the offense you've taken than learning a position that isn't favorable to you.

    And that's the point.

    Replies: @Rosie

  147. @Wyatt
    @Rosie

    Rosie, how many of those male billionaires are jewish? Because when I look at destructive billionaires, I notice that most of them are jewish and the few who are even close to decent are definitely not jewish, i.e., Elon Musk and Peter Thiel. At the very least, they push for more right wing values. No one is allowed to have pro-white values openly. A black man can't even appeal to the center without getting harangued by the left.

    Further, there are only a handful of female billionaires (virtually all of them wealthy only because of entrepreneurial male relatives) and all of the ones I found are left wing and shit. At the very least, Bill Gates has sterilized a bunch of Africans. It doesn't directly benefit whites, but the world isn't smarting from a lack of blacks.

    The fact of the matter is that women have served as the fodder for leftist and neo-con movements that have undermined western civilization. We saw how the principally male fascist and socialist movements of the former half of the 20th century rose and fell, but the countries they dominated survived. The social-justice movements, white guilt industry and academic brainwashing institutions have become more and more dominated by women as time has gone on. Likewise, they've gotten shittier, more bold faced and vile as time has gone on.

    It's like I said. The principle value of women in a movement is the clockwork destruction they bring to that movement. The left is in the early stages of its own death and its because of the sheer volume of female bodies being fed into the revolutionary grinder. So far, the nationalist movements are on the rise and the lack of women has left them still capable of rising.

    Replies: @Rosie, @Rosie

    Half of the Forbes 400 are White. What is your excuse for them, Wyatt?

    http://racehist.blogspot.com/2013/04/2012-forbes-400-by-ethnic-origins.html

    I know it’s hard for you to face the facts, but the White man is an individualist, and it may be the end of us.

  148. @vinteuil
    @The Germ Theory of Disease


    Do you ever, ever, ever hear a J weeping and bemoaning excessive J privilege?
     
    No.

    Good on them.

    Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease

    “Good on them.”

    OK, so you agree with step one.

    I’m guessing you’re smart enough to also suss out steps two through umpty-zillion, but it would be gratifying to see you articulate it on your own speed, and not make me step it out.

  149. @Corvinus
    @Reg Cæsar

    That poll skews conservative. So it’s other than surprising with the results.

    But most polls do have a political bent to it.

    Ever since 2016, I don’t put much stock into it. For example, Trump can definitely win in states where he is behind.

    Although, he says if he doesn’t, then he was cheated. If he wins, there was no cheating. That is nuts!

    He and his supporters have already wrote the narrative and have the playbook to put into place if he loses.

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar

    Although, he says if he doesn’t, then he was cheated. If he wins, there was no cheating. That is nuts!

    No different from Team Gore in 2000. (Or was it 2001?) If Al had pulled ahead by one vote on, say, the 137th recount, they would have deemed any 138th recount invalid before it got started.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    @Reg Cæsar

    Not even remotely an apples to apples comparison.

    Replies: @fish

  150. @jo shmo
    @The Alarmist


    Last week Ms. Boorn watched most of the virtual Democratic National Convention.
     
    This statement makes question whether the whole article.

    The DNC had very very few views. Anyone who watched most of it is a reporter or a dem operative or a freak of nature. So, none of the above is anywhere near the american citizen average.

    Replies: @Justvisiting

    Watching most of the Democratic National Convention would require an IQ significantly below room temperature.

    I don’t know a dog or cat that could tolerate that glossolalia.

  151. @throtler
    @BB753

    This article is tailor-made for misogynistic outbursts.

    Replies: @BB753, @Rosie, @MBlanc46

    One person’s misogyny is another person’s truth-telling.

    • Agree: BB753
    • Replies: @Rosie
    @MBlanc46


    One person’s misogyny is another person’s truth-telling.
     
    It's usually not terribly difficult to tell the difference between a sincere dissident and a raving misogynist crank. Mental gymnastics like Wyatt's are a dead giveaway.

    He blames women for Leftist agitation, then he says we're incompetent and ruin everything. Despite their phenomenal success over the past 75 years, he then assures us that leftist organizations will crash and burn under the weight of female stupidity any day now. At which point, the superior right-wing organizations run by men will stand up and set everything to rights. Or something.

    It's completely absurd on its face.

    Replies: @Ghost of Bull Moose

  152. @Kolya Krassotkin
    @J.Ross

    An 8 or 9 year old boy who is environmentally and socially conscious is going to grow up to be an interior decorator or Milo Yiannapoulis.

    Replies: @Ben tillman

    Or me.

  153. @Art Deco
    @Wilkey

    I've forgotten who it was who said liberals are commonly people who fancy they're better than the people they grew up around.

    Replies: @Ben tillman

    It’s especially applicable to liberals who grew up in the South.

  154. @Ghost of Bull Moose
    @ben tillman

    What about Jewish Voice for Peace, Students for Justice in Palestine and BDS? 'Js' who bitch about Jewish privilege constantly.

    Replies: @Ben tillman

    Not in this country or anywhere else Jews are a minority.

    • Replies: @Ghost of Bull Moose
    @Ben tillman

    SJP and JVP exist only in countries where Jews are a minority. They have no influence whatsoever in Israel. They are ostensibly anti-Zionist, but their reason for being is the premise that Jews have undue influence in America.

    Which is true, of course. But you know, anti-Zionists have their big Satan and their little Satan, so I'm not sure there's much room for common cause with heritage Americans or gentiles even if they agree on that point.

    In any case, I'm not bothered with most 'J' talk around here because I'm first and foremost an American, and the way I see it, today they call Israel an apartheid state and tomorrow (the very day whites become a minority) they will call America an apartheid state. They do that already, ignoring the essential fact that whites in America and Jews in Israel are not minorities, therefore the comparison is not apt. I'm also half Scots-Irish descended from settlers, and they're plenty well represented among the perfidious One Worlders themselves.

    But demographics are all. Israel had a serious demographic threat years ago and then got an infusion of Soviets to hold it back for a few decades. America is facing a demographic threat, and the American Jews (and others) encouraging this population replacement are stupid and/or malignant, no doubt. As Steve says, they better wise up to the fact that these Third Worlders think of Jews as white but even more so ( even if some whites don't think J's are white at all.) Fuzzy Wuzzys do not differentiate.

    Replies: @ben tillman

  155. @Pop Warner
    @Rosie

    The French Revolution was a Satanic movement, no different from the Bolshevik coup in Russia. The revolutionaries were nothing more than mass murderers deluded by revenge fantasies and lust for power. They lost all credibility when their brutality exceeded that of the Ancien Regime they overthrew. I spit on the notion of Liberty and Equality, equality is something that only exists in the legal realm. There is no equality in nature, only equilibrium achieved through hierarchy.

    Replies: @Rosie, @Alden

    I spit on the notion of Liberty and Equality, equality is something that only exists in the legal realm. There is no equality in nature, only equilibrium achieved through hierarchy.

    I see. You’re pro-hierarchy, and you justify this by appeal to the naturalistic fallacy.

    I’m just pro-White. Of course we don’t see eye to eye.

  156. @MBlanc46
    @throtler

    One person’s misogyny is another person’s truth-telling.

    Replies: @Rosie

    One person’s misogyny is another person’s truth-telling.

    It’s usually not terribly difficult to tell the difference between a sincere dissident and a raving misogynist crank. Mental gymnastics like Wyatt’s are a dead giveaway.

    He blames women for Leftist agitation, then he says we’re incompetent and ruin everything. Despite their phenomenal success over the past 75 years, he then assures us that leftist organizations will crash and burn under the weight of female stupidity any day now. At which point, the superior right-wing organizations run by men will stand up and set everything to rights. Or something.

    It’s completely absurd on its face.

    • Replies: @Ghost of Bull Moose
    @Rosie

    It's the mirror image of woke white women who go on about 'white men.' Do these people hate their fathers and/or mothers that much? 'Cause you know, can't have one without the other. With exceptions, women are suited to rule the social world and family life and men the political world. I don't consider either sphere less important than the other. In the West both of these worlds are in crisis.

    Don't sweat it, Rosie. It's a big sausage party on iSteve most of the time, so your perspective is appreciated.

  157. @Rosie
    @Wyatt


    Rosie, how many of those male billionaires are jewish?

     

    How many of the "White women" you see at BLM protests are Jewish? You don't know, do you, Wyatt?

    No one is allowed to have pro-white values openly.
     
    Billionaires aren't "allowed" to be pro-White? Who exactly won't allow it, Wyatt? And why do you insist on antagonizing women when you yourself admit the real source of the problem?


    So far, the nationalist movements are on the rise and the lack of women has left them still capable of rising.
     
    Lol my achin' sides. The alt-Right is totally defunct, thanks to a bunch of White male police officers who refused to defend other White men's right to freedom of speech.

    Meanwhile, in Europe, nationalist men are puzzled by the American movement's misogyny.

    Replies: @Wyatt

    How many of the “White women” you see at BLM protests are Jewish? You don’t know, do you, Wyatt?

    Non-sequitur. The contention you made was that billionaires are the persons of importance and that they need to be acting. BLM is just the latest in a series of movements designed to destabilize the United States. Individual jews marching in it will do fuck all, but billionaire Jewish backers like George Soros have a massive impact.

    Billionaires aren’t “allowed” to be pro-White? Who exactly won’t allow it, Wyatt? And why do you insist on antagonizing women when you yourself admit the real source of the problem?

    Half of the Forbes 400 are White. What is your excuse for them, Wyatt?

    http://racehist.blogspot.com/2013/04/2012-forbes-400-by-ethnic-origins.html

    I know it’s hard for you to face the facts, but the White man is an individualist, and it may be the end of us.

    Usual suspects. ADL, SPLC and the media. Iowa Rep. Steve King was thoroughly ruined by a media blitz and pressure from the Jewish watchdog groups just for saying that America’s young can’t be replaced by other people. Any person with a semblance of power who openly advocates for white people or white interests will be systematically ruined. Even tangential support for unity (as in the case of Terry Crews advocating neutrality and reconciliation) results in backlash. The situation in America has become so hostile to white interest that anyone, especially powerful people, will be shut down at all costs, even if it means violating basic rights of free speech.

    Women are one of the Jewish golems. Like blacks, it’s terribly easy to convince them of their own victimhood, their own tragedy and their entitlement to other people’s wealth. Women don’t bring much to movements beyond momentum. The detriments they do bring with them (pettiness, self-importance, Queen Bee behavior) is often lethal to movements. Internet atheism was big about a decade ago but surprise surprise, women introduced themselves into the movement, redubbed it Atheism Plus and the movement died for the aforementioned reasons.

    Ask yourself this: among all the important discourse you’ve seen regarding white nationalism, the most effective speech to convince whites of the imminent danger they face, how much of that has come from women? How many people do you think have been redpilled on Jews by women?

    Women don’t make movements to serve a greater purpose. They make and enter movements to serve themselves. Gamergate showed that was the case with multiple game journalist women trying to shut down gaming to protect a whore. Intersectional feminism showed that was the case with useless, well paid feminists latching onto other people’s movements to stay relevant.

    Can you tell me what it is that women could bring to an ethno-nationalist movement? Do you know of any women who could even make a convincing argument to someone on the fence, much less humiliate a soc-prog retard on a public stage? I can tell you all the problems women have brought to prior movements, but there’s enough condescension coming from you that I think you’re more concerned about the offense you’ve taken than learning a position that isn’t favorable to you.

    And that’s the point.

    • Replies: @Rosie
    @Wyatt


    Non-sequitur. The contention you made was that billionaires are the persons of importance and that they need to be acting. BLM is just the latest in a series of movements designed to destabilize the United States. Individual jews marching in it will do fuck all, but billionaire Jewish backers like George Soros have a massive impact.
     
    This is incoherent rambling. I asked you how you know that the women you see at BLM protests are not Jewish? You did not give me an answer, because you don't know. The Jew defense either works, or it doesn't. You don't get to use it to defend men and then deny that it applies to women.


    Usual suspects. ADL, SPLC and the media. Iowa Rep. Steve King was thoroughly ruined by a media blitz and pressure from the Jewish watchdog groups just for saying that America’s young can’t be replaced by other people. Any person with a semblance of power who openly advocates for white people or white interests will be systematically ruined. Even tangential support for unity (as in the case of Terry Crews advocating neutrality and reconciliation) results in backlash. The situation in America has become so hostile to white interest that anyone, especially powerful people, will be shut down at all costs, even if it means violating basic rights of free speech.
     
    And whose fault is that? KMac seems to be still alive and breathing. Why couldn't a billionaire weather the storm? Where are all the untouchable tenured academics?

    Women are one of the Jewish golems. Like blacks, it’s terribly easy to convince them of their own victimhood, their own tragedy and their entitlement to other people’s wealth.
     
    This is patently false. White women have not believed themselves to be victims for a long time. We are as likely to oppose affirmative action as White men, less likely than women of other races to consider ourselves feminists, and nearly as likely as White men to attribute women's lower professional achievement to our own own choices.

    I have posted evidence to support these claims repeatedly on this site.


    Women don’t make movements to serve a greater purpose. They make and enter movements to serve themselves. Gamergate showed that was the case with multiple game journalist women trying to shut down gaming to protect a whore. Intersectional feminism showed that was the case with useless, well paid feminists latching onto other people’s movements to stay relevant.
     
    Here, as usual, you offer nothing but unjustifiably broad generalizations about women.

    Can you tell me what it is that women could bring to an ethno-nationalist movement? Do you know of any women who could even make a convincing argument to someone on the fence, much less humiliate a soc-prog retard on a public stage?
     
    I certainly could, but never mind that. You are not entitled to dictate the standard for determining women's participation in politics. I can't tell you what "women" could bring. I can only tell you what a particular woman could bring in light of her own unique qualities.

    Ican tell you all the problems women have brought to prior movements,
     You keep saying that, but you haven't provided any evidence to support your claims.

    but there’s enough condescension coming from you that I think you’re more concerned about the offense you’ve taken than learning a position that isn’t favorable to you.

    And that’s the point.
     
    Projection.

    Replies: @Rosie, @Wyatt, @Alden

  158. @Mr. Anon

    “It’s hard raising white men in America,” she said of her three boys, ages 8, 5 and 16 months. “You want to understand that they understand their position as an ally.”
     
    What a bunch of mush. "understand that they understand...." Can't people even speak clearly anymore? What does this woman even mean by that?

    Replies: @J.Ross, @JohnnyWalker123, @Kolya Krassotkin, @Alec Leamas (hard at work), @Lagertha

    incredibly stupid and uneducated women like this creep should have not been allowed to have children. One good point about working women in Democrat cities would be if they became so infertile that they can not conceive anymore. Similarly, I would be fine with every leftist Coastal woman to have an abortion way into their 40’s – Democrat-voting white women do not deserve to have sons. Democrat women do not deserve to have children.

    I love my sons, and I so, sooo hate American leftist/Democrat women. They are monsters and will harm their sons. They are a danger to humanity. They need to be censored and shamed forever…hahhahhahahaaaa!

    • Agree: jsm
    • Replies: @jsm
    @Lagertha


    Similarly, I would be fine with every leftist Coastal woman to have an abortion way into their 40’s – Democrat-voting white women do not deserve to have sons. Democrat women do not deserve to have children.
     
    Aye.

    Heavenly Father, if Jesus need tarry a bit longer, could you please, in the meantime, send an epidemic of Asherman's syndrome? Thanks!

    Replies: @Lagertha

  159. @Ben tillman
    @Ghost of Bull Moose

    Not in this country or anywhere else Jews are a minority.

    Replies: @Ghost of Bull Moose

    SJP and JVP exist only in countries where Jews are a minority. They have no influence whatsoever in Israel. They are ostensibly anti-Zionist, but their reason for being is the premise that Jews have undue influence in America.

    Which is true, of course. But you know, anti-Zionists have their big Satan and their little Satan, so I’m not sure there’s much room for common cause with heritage Americans or gentiles even if they agree on that point.

    In any case, I’m not bothered with most ‘J’ talk around here because I’m first and foremost an American, and the way I see it, today they call Israel an apartheid state and tomorrow (the very day whites become a minority) they will call America an apartheid state. They do that already, ignoring the essential fact that whites in America and Jews in Israel are not minorities, therefore the comparison is not apt. I’m also half Scots-Irish descended from settlers, and they’re plenty well represented among the perfidious One Worlders themselves.

    But demographics are all. Israel had a serious demographic threat years ago and then got an infusion of Soviets to hold it back for a few decades. America is facing a demographic threat, and the American Jews (and others) encouraging this population replacement are stupid and/or malignant, no doubt. As Steve says, they better wise up to the fact that these Third Worlders think of Jews as white but even more so ( even if some whites don’t think J’s are white at all.) Fuzzy Wuzzys do not differentiate.

    • Replies: @ben tillman
    @Ghost of Bull Moose


    SJP and JVP exist only in countries where Jews are a minority.
     
    I never heard of them, and I -- more importantly -- never heard from them. They're a complete non-factor. Jews NEVER apologize for Jewish privilege anywhere that matters.
  160. @Rosie
    @MBlanc46


    One person’s misogyny is another person’s truth-telling.
     
    It's usually not terribly difficult to tell the difference between a sincere dissident and a raving misogynist crank. Mental gymnastics like Wyatt's are a dead giveaway.

    He blames women for Leftist agitation, then he says we're incompetent and ruin everything. Despite their phenomenal success over the past 75 years, he then assures us that leftist organizations will crash and burn under the weight of female stupidity any day now. At which point, the superior right-wing organizations run by men will stand up and set everything to rights. Or something.

    It's completely absurd on its face.

    Replies: @Ghost of Bull Moose

    It’s the mirror image of woke white women who go on about ‘white men.’ Do these people hate their fathers and/or mothers that much? ‘Cause you know, can’t have one without the other. With exceptions, women are suited to rule the social world and family life and men the political world. I don’t consider either sphere less important than the other. In the West both of these worlds are in crisis.

    Don’t sweat it, Rosie. It’s a big sausage party on iSteve most of the time, so your perspective is appreciated.

  161. @Justvisiting
    @Ghost of Bull Moose

    Good point on status signaling.

    My take on it is that when people have unearned wealth they can devolve into a "cargo cult" where stuff just mysteriously appears on the island with no rational explanation.

    They then create myths/religions to explain that which cannot be explained by their limited intelligence.

    The ignorance is due (in part) to modern education's refusal to educate school children on the basics of micro economics.

    Replies: @Ghost of Bull Moose

    The Quillette piece I linked to talks about the class element. You imitate those above you, and differentiate yourself from those below. There is a cargo cult element, in that the proles adopt these ideas as if the ideas themselves are the essence of status. Like building an airplane out of bamboo. They don’t understand the underlying concepts.

  162. I hope Ms Bourn will make enough money to support her sons when they’re 45, 42, and 37 years old, totally unemployable because they’re White men.

    • Replies: @Art Deco
    @Alden

    Her sons won't be unemployable. They may be under court order to make support payments to the dreadful women with whom they've been involved (in order to provide for children whom they're seldom permitted to see and who give them lip), but they'll be working. They'll even accede to their mother's demands for attention; they just won't take her seriously.

    Replies: @Alden

  163. @Pop Warner
    @Rosie

    The French Revolution was a Satanic movement, no different from the Bolshevik coup in Russia. The revolutionaries were nothing more than mass murderers deluded by revenge fantasies and lust for power. They lost all credibility when their brutality exceeded that of the Ancien Regime they overthrew. I spit on the notion of Liberty and Equality, equality is something that only exists in the legal realm. There is no equality in nature, only equilibrium achieved through hierarchy.

    Replies: @Rosie, @Alden

    Agree with you about the French Revolution. You’re absolutely right. It was more a property grab like the English reformation than a satanic plot though.

  164. @Jim Don Bob
    @BB753

    I wonder how many couples he had to interview before he found this ditz woman and her whipped husband. He, like so many other "journalists", already had the story written. He just needed some bolstering quotes from real people in flyover country.

    Replies: @Ghost of Bull Moose, @Alden

    If indeed the couple really exists.

  165. @Abe
    @Rosie

    Still not 100% sure you’re really a woman, but to unparaphrase Wise Latina Supreme Court Justice’s bowdlerization of a genuinely wise proverb, “a wise old man and wise old woman will come to the same judgment”.

    I started watching the jock-sniffing Michael Jordan documentary LAST DANCE during my workouts recently despite my better judgement. There is a segment early on where Jordan disavows any involvement in mid-80’s Bulls “traveling cocaine circus” antics, saying that as an NBA rookie he was content merely to hang out in his apartment, drink milk, watch movies, and writer letters back home to his North Carolina big black momma, at which point I burst out laughing, thinking what a shame the upright and continent Jordan ran into that bad seed Tiger Woods, who proceeded to hopelessly compromise him with hookers, drugs, and gambling.

    The point being, there is still such a market for American males’ pathetic, juvenile sports celebrity hero-worship (one tiny aspect of which is keeping Jordan forever the same SPACE JAMMIN’ teddybear he once and will always be in the minds of millions of impressionable 30-something American men-children) that even “conservative” men of dazzling wealth and influence like T. Boone Pickens, Jerry Jones, etc. instead of doing something meaningful with it, just funnel it back into what is effectively the Great American jogga/white coed rape pipeline.

    Replies: @Rosie, @Steve Sailer

    I’ve never heard of a rumor of Michael Jordan doing cocaine while he was with the Bulls. His performance was so consistently strong that you can’t see in his stats any time he might have been dragged down by cocaine, the way you can see in the stats of Tim Raines or Keith Hernandez.

    • Agree: ScarletNumber
    • Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease
    @Steve Sailer

    I met Michael Jordan once. He gave the strong impression of being a real straight arrow kind of guy who was dedicated to his craft, you wouldn't have ever thought from being in his presence, This guy's a coke-head. Or any kind of weirdo or goofball. He didn't make you nervous that way.

    He just seemed really serious and straight on the money. I mean, he was a black basketball superstar so he didn't exactly draw comparisons with Samuel Beckett, but I've met famous black guys who obviously had drug issues, and he didn't have any of those tells. I'm not the world's expert on these sorts of character estimations, but he seemed like a solid dude.

    Replies: @Steve Sailer

  166. @Bernard
    The marriage is doomed.

    Replies: @Anonymous, @3g4me, @res, @ScarletNumber

    The man mentioned in the article is her stepfather, not her husband. This article is proof of why you should never marry a woman with children, BTW.

  167. @HammerJack
    @HammerJack

    Guh, forgot the money quote:


    "She has no right to wreck our history."
     

    Replies: @Mr. Anon, @Escher

    Literal wrecking is ok.

  168. @Steve Sailer
    @Abe

    I've never heard of a rumor of Michael Jordan doing cocaine while he was with the Bulls. His performance was so consistently strong that you can't see in his stats any time he might have been dragged down by cocaine, the way you can see in the stats of Tim Raines or Keith Hernandez.

    Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease

    I met Michael Jordan once. He gave the strong impression of being a real straight arrow kind of guy who was dedicated to his craft, you wouldn’t have ever thought from being in his presence, This guy’s a coke-head. Or any kind of weirdo or goofball. He didn’t make you nervous that way.

    He just seemed really serious and straight on the money. I mean, he was a black basketball superstar so he didn’t exactly draw comparisons with Samuel Beckett, but I’ve met famous black guys who obviously had drug issues, and he didn’t have any of those tells. I’m not the world’s expert on these sorts of character estimations, but he seemed like a solid dude.

    • Replies: @Steve Sailer
    @The Germ Theory of Disease

    Jordan has vices, like gambling, that are offshoots of his extreme competitiveness and desire to constantly win. But cocaine would have just gotten in the way of Jordan winning, so he didn't do it. I presume the % of NBA players on cocaine dropped considerably over the course of the 1980s, in part just because you needed your best effort to have a hope of stopping Jordan. The quality of the lesser games tended to improve over the course of the decade.

    Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease, @Abe

  169. @ari silver
    @San Fernando Curt

    Good catch! I was suspicious of this part of the bio:Ohio State-educated chemical engineer, who left the work force to home-school her three sons. I think tall tale.

    Replies: @Alden

    I don’t believe either this woman or the man exists. It’s just a mass of enlightenment cliches. When I used to read newspapers there were articles like this all the time.

    So she doesn’t work. How will she support her sons 30 and 40 years from now? As White men, affirmative action makes them unemployable.

    • Replies: @Steve Sailer
    @Alden

    Why are all these commenters complaining that the run-of-the-mill Conventional Wisdom-espousing woman in the article can't possibly exist?

    Replies: @Rosie, @black sea, @Ghost of Bull Moose, @Alden, @Wyatt

  170. @The Germ Theory of Disease
    @Steve Sailer

    I met Michael Jordan once. He gave the strong impression of being a real straight arrow kind of guy who was dedicated to his craft, you wouldn't have ever thought from being in his presence, This guy's a coke-head. Or any kind of weirdo or goofball. He didn't make you nervous that way.

    He just seemed really serious and straight on the money. I mean, he was a black basketball superstar so he didn't exactly draw comparisons with Samuel Beckett, but I've met famous black guys who obviously had drug issues, and he didn't have any of those tells. I'm not the world's expert on these sorts of character estimations, but he seemed like a solid dude.

    Replies: @Steve Sailer

    Jordan has vices, like gambling, that are offshoots of his extreme competitiveness and desire to constantly win. But cocaine would have just gotten in the way of Jordan winning, so he didn’t do it. I presume the % of NBA players on cocaine dropped considerably over the course of the 1980s, in part just because you needed your best effort to have a hope of stopping Jordan. The quality of the lesser games tended to improve over the course of the decade.

    • Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease
    @Steve Sailer

    "his extreme competitiveness and desire to constantly win"

    That may be so; I wouldn't claim to be an expert on a guy I met only once and rather briefly. Still, when you come into contact with people who've achieved greatness in their field, you tend to pay attention to all the details of what they do and say, because even little things offer clues about their genius. The vibe I got from Jordan was not that he was hyper-competitive, it was that he felt he had been given a special particular gift, and thought he had an obligation to develop it and use it wisely. He gave off the sense of a guy who knew that he towered over his colleagues, and felt a sort of noblesse oblige about how to handle that kind of unusual status. But that's just one reporter's opinion.

    Replies: @BB753

    , @Abe
    @Steve Sailer


    Jordan has vices, like gambling, that are offshoots of his extreme competitiveness and desire to constantly win.
     
    I feel like the impertinent grasshopper correcting the master here, since you, Steve, were the one who originally WOKE me to the existence of the ‘Jordan rules’ or whatever they’re called- i.e. the effective information blackout on Jordan’s personal life by a lapdog sports media desperate to retain access above all else- cf. the almost total memory-holing of Jordan’s divorce ~10 years ago even as the fall-out from it (His Airness reduced to schlepping Hanes T-shirts and underwear on TV to get back some of the money lost after an adverse divorce settlement) was staring us in the face.

    The actual quote (from MJ himself) in LAST DANCE was about Jordan walking in on a preseason team coke party in Peoria (“Peoria coke party” being the saddest 3 words in the universe next to “Joyce Carol Oates”), seeing “lines” over here, weed over there, women over there (probably a mixture of skinny, lively black girls and hollow-eyed, chunky, bleached blonde white girls and every one of them with big hair- basically a backup dancing troupe for a Rick James music video) and him immediately skeedaddling it right out of there, it taking the last ounce of gumption in his 6’6” lanky frame not to run back to Carolina so he could be fishing with Oppie and Andy by Sunday.

    So, yes, thanks for the reality check- given Jordan’s extremely high level of performance over 15+ years, he probably was not doing coke. I find it extremely hard to believe he has not banging out wannabe Rick James girls in the same time period, and impossible to believe in his Vegas/post-NBA years he was not gambling, banging 100’s of skanks, doing God knows what drugs, and cruising the strip with Tom Hanks for homeless albinos to take home and and then have sit on his chest while they ripped out his toe nails.

    Meaning, LAST DANCE’s attempt to still sell Jordan’s wholesome, 90’s era SPACE JAM teddybear image is a bit ridiculous given all that has come out since, given all that you yourself, Steve, have done to educate us about the slimy MO of entertainment media, given all Trump has taught us all about the slimy MO of ALL MEDIA (“found Duranty until proven innocent”). Fare thee well, young man, and jock sniff no more.

    Replies: @Alden

  171. @Alden
    @ari silver

    I don’t believe either this woman or the man exists. It’s just a mass of enlightenment cliches. When I used to read newspapers there were articles like this all the time.

    So she doesn’t work. How will she support her sons 30 and 40 years from now? As White men, affirmative action makes them unemployable.

    Replies: @Steve Sailer

    Why are all these commenters complaining that the run-of-the-mill Conventional Wisdom-espousing woman in the article can’t possibly exist?

    • Replies: @Rosie
    @Steve Sailer


    Why are all these commenters complaining that the run-of-the-mill Conventional Wisdom-espousing woman in the article can’t possibly exist?
     
    Because the character isn't really that believable. Only liberal women talk like that, and liberal women don't have three kids.

    I certainly believe she exists, but I agree with the commenter that said this reporter had to go through several normal mothers before she found this one.
    , @black sea
    @Steve Sailer

    Because, from a journalistic standpoint, a source that's too good to be true probably isn't. But maybe the reporter fed her her lines, which she dutifully repeated back to him. Also, it was published in the New York Times, which ceased to be a fact-based journal some decades go.

    , @Ghost of Bull Moose
    @Steve Sailer

    For one thing, she was a lifetime one-issue voter on abortion who has joined the party of late-term abortion on demand due to a "difficult pregnancy." Women who miscarry or have close calls with their babies just do not suddenly get enthusiastic about abortion on demand including late-term. If anything they go the other way.

    The whole time she was a one-issue voter, she also knew her home town was full of 'racists,' but she didn't care because she opposed abortion. Now she really cares racism and 'climate change.' She's now a multi-issue voter with Times-approved views on all the right issues. In an election year where must win white women, they need 1,000s like her to switch sides.

    She became a Democrat and thendecided to leave a job in chemical engineering to home school her kids? Come on. She became a liberal but now doesn't trust the public schools?

    This guy wrote the article and then went to find the people the article was about.

    Replies: @Alden

    , @Alden
    @Steve Sailer

    I used to read daily newspapers. I recognize the style, technique whatever it’s called.

    Who watched the entire DNC TV show? Very few. What with the EEOC extortion threats to hire women engineers, even White women if a non White can’t be found or imported, what’s a woman engineer doing staying at home with the kids? What does the husband do that he can support a non working wife and 3 kids?

    The man the writer/liar claims to have interviewed is even more bogus. No family that has 3 TVs with Fox on all day watched anti White Netflix shows.

    , @Wyatt
    @Steve Sailer

    There's a micro-meme of "did the Onion write this or is it real?" that's become mildly pervasive due to the insanity of the day. It explains people's incredulity at articles that seem too surreal or suspicious. Try this one on for size:

    Progressive rainbow lesbians drive van full of black adoptees off California cliff

    Onion or not Onion?

    It's no longer possible to tell if something is legit or not right off the bat. The smarties know when something's up, but they don't always know for sure. Since the media is just a propaganda outlet now, there's an overwhelming chance that if one smells shit, there is shit.

  172. @Wyatt
    @Rosie


    How many of the “White women” you see at BLM protests are Jewish? You don’t know, do you, Wyatt?
     
    Non-sequitur. The contention you made was that billionaires are the persons of importance and that they need to be acting. BLM is just the latest in a series of movements designed to destabilize the United States. Individual jews marching in it will do fuck all, but billionaire Jewish backers like George Soros have a massive impact.

    Billionaires aren’t “allowed” to be pro-White? Who exactly won’t allow it, Wyatt? And why do you insist on antagonizing women when you yourself admit the real source of the problem?
     

    Half of the Forbes 400 are White. What is your excuse for them, Wyatt?

    http://racehist.blogspot.com/2013/04/2012-forbes-400-by-ethnic-origins.html

    I know it’s hard for you to face the facts, but the White man is an individualist, and it may be the end of us.
     
    Usual suspects. ADL, SPLC and the media. Iowa Rep. Steve King was thoroughly ruined by a media blitz and pressure from the Jewish watchdog groups just for saying that America's young can't be replaced by other people. Any person with a semblance of power who openly advocates for white people or white interests will be systematically ruined. Even tangential support for unity (as in the case of Terry Crews advocating neutrality and reconciliation) results in backlash. The situation in America has become so hostile to white interest that anyone, especially powerful people, will be shut down at all costs, even if it means violating basic rights of free speech.


    Women are one of the Jewish golems. Like blacks, it's terribly easy to convince them of their own victimhood, their own tragedy and their entitlement to other people's wealth. Women don't bring much to movements beyond momentum. The detriments they do bring with them (pettiness, self-importance, Queen Bee behavior) is often lethal to movements. Internet atheism was big about a decade ago but surprise surprise, women introduced themselves into the movement, redubbed it Atheism Plus and the movement died for the aforementioned reasons.

    Ask yourself this: among all the important discourse you've seen regarding white nationalism, the most effective speech to convince whites of the imminent danger they face, how much of that has come from women? How many people do you think have been redpilled on Jews by women?

    Women don't make movements to serve a greater purpose. They make and enter movements to serve themselves. Gamergate showed that was the case with multiple game journalist women trying to shut down gaming to protect a whore. Intersectional feminism showed that was the case with useless, well paid feminists latching onto other people's movements to stay relevant.

    Can you tell me what it is that women could bring to an ethno-nationalist movement? Do you know of any women who could even make a convincing argument to someone on the fence, much less humiliate a soc-prog retard on a public stage? I can tell you all the problems women have brought to prior movements, but there's enough condescension coming from you that I think you're more concerned about the offense you've taken than learning a position that isn't favorable to you.

    And that's the point.

    Replies: @Rosie

    Non-sequitur. The contention you made was that billionaires are the persons of importance and that they need to be acting. BLM is just the latest in a series of movements designed to destabilize the United States. Individual jews marching in it will do fuck all, but billionaire Jewish backers like George Soros have a massive impact.

    This is incoherent rambling. I asked you how you know that the women you see at BLM protests are not Jewish? You did not give me an answer, because you don’t know. The Jew defense either works, or it doesn’t. You don’t get to use it to defend men and then deny that it applies to women.

    Usual suspects. ADL, SPLC and the media. Iowa Rep. Steve King was thoroughly ruined by a media blitz and pressure from the Jewish watchdog groups just for saying that America’s young can’t be replaced by other people. Any person with a semblance of power who openly advocates for white people or white interests will be systematically ruined. Even tangential support for unity (as in the case of Terry Crews advocating neutrality and reconciliation) results in backlash. The situation in America has become so hostile to white interest that anyone, especially powerful people, will be shut down at all costs, even if it means violating basic rights of free speech.

    And whose fault is that? KMac seems to be still alive and breathing. Why couldn’t a billionaire weather the storm? Where are all the untouchable tenured academics?

    Women are one of the Jewish golems. Like blacks, it’s terribly easy to convince them of their own victimhood, their own tragedy and their entitlement to other people’s wealth.

    This is patently false. White women have not believed themselves to be victims for a long time. We are as likely to oppose affirmative action as White men, less likely than women of other races to consider ourselves feminists, and nearly as likely as White men to attribute women’s lower professional achievement to our own own choices.

    I have posted evidence to support these claims repeatedly on this site.

    Women don’t make movements to serve a greater purpose. They make and enter movements to serve themselves. Gamergate showed that was the case with multiple game journalist women trying to shut down gaming to protect a whore. Intersectional feminism showed that was the case with useless, well paid feminists latching onto other people’s movements to stay relevant.

    Here, as usual, you offer nothing but unjustifiably broad generalizations about women.

    Can you tell me what it is that women could bring to an ethno-nationalist movement? Do you know of any women who could even make a convincing argument to someone on the fence, much less humiliate a soc-prog retard on a public stage?

    I certainly could, but never mind that. You are not entitled to dictate the standard for determining women’s participation in politics. I can’t tell you what “women” could bring. I can only tell you what a particular woman could bring in light of her own unique qualities.

    Ican tell you all the problems women have brought to prior movements,

    You keep saying that, but you haven’t provided any evidence to support your claims.

    but there’s enough condescension coming from you that I think you’re more concerned about the offense you’ve taken than learning a position that isn’t favorable to you.

    And that’s the point.

    Projection.

    • Replies: @Rosie
    @Rosie


    less likely than women of other races to consider ourselves feminists
     
    Correction: White women are more likely to identify as "not feminist" than women of other races. This is unsurprising, of course, because many of us can see that organized feminism targets our own men, whom we know to be a great deal less chauvinistic than other men.
    , @Wyatt
    @Rosie


    This is incoherent rambling. I asked you how you know that the women you see at BLM protests are not Jewish? You did not give me an answer, because you don’t know. The Jew defense either works, or it doesn’t. You don’t get to use it to defend men and then deny that it applies to women.
     
    It's not, actually. As I said, your contention was regarding billionaires. When I pointed out that large numbers of "white" billionaires are jews, you immediately went to asking how many BLM women were jews. That's irrelevant because both your contention and mine was on financing and support. You didn't address the problem of belligerent Jewish billionaires; you shifted the goalposts to try and point out something tangential. Beyond that, population is

    And whose fault is that? KMac seems to be still alive and breathing. Why couldn’t a billionaire weather the storm? Where are all the untouchable tenured academics?
     
    The jews? I don't know what you're asking. If there weren't Ashkenazi jews in America, the ADL, SPLC and AIPAC wouldn't exist. Jewish subversion is designed specifically to silence white resistance through public shame and financial disenfranchisement. Are you going to ask why whites couldn't resist subversives who could ruin their lives for even speaking out?

    Papa John got dismissed for saying a naughty word. Man is a billionaire. All he did was use Power Word: Nigger and they fired his ass. I imagine someone that says "White people have a right to their own nation" would be subject to criminal investigations, threats from our long nosed friends, disciplinary actions from executive boards and public boycotts condoned by the right. Also, we've seen discrediting, failure to renew contracts and slandering of professors. Richard Lynn is the most prominent one I know. He lost his title because of the woke era for even daring to posit that there are racial differences.

    This is patently false. White women have not believed themselves to be victims for a long time. We are as likely to oppose affirmative action as White men, less likely than women of other races to consider ourselves feminists, and nearly as likely as White men to attribute women’s lower professional achievement to our own own choices.

    I have posted evidence to support these claims repeatedly on this site.
     
    Cool. Link the post or the url. It's not hard and you want to challenge me on a lack of citations by failing to cite anything yourself. Your assertion is false.

    Here, as usual, you offer nothing but unjustifiably broad generalizations about women.
     
    And you failed to refute it. You're attempting to dismiss the point without actually showing that it's not true. Generalizations hold broad truth for a reason. The phenomenon I described is readily observable. There are at least half a dozen documented events and groups where women have wormed their way into a movement or organization and things went to shit. Hell, comic books has had a woman problem these last few years. Want to watch some videos with me as Richard Meyers shits on SJW women in comics ruining the industry that even Rob Liefeld couldn't?

    I certainly could, but never mind that.
     
    You could, but you won't. You would cite things, but you already cited them. It feels like I'm arguing with one of those blacks who think blacks invented everything. Lady, if a man was arguing the way you are, they would have been dog piled already.

    You are not entitled to dictate the standard for determining women’s participation in politics. I can’t tell you what “women” could bring. I can only tell you what a particular woman could bring in light of her own unique qualities.
     
    No, but I can demand you prove your assertions when you claim that mine are wrong. You've proven this before, but you don't want to show that you have. You're willing to commit the time to reply, but not willing to show why you're right despite bitching at me for not citing things.

    As for what you can tell me about a particular woman's unique qualities, do it. Come on, do it. Do something at least.

    Correction: White women are more likely to identify as “not feminist” than women of other races. This is unsurprising, of course, because many of us can see that organized feminism targets our own men, whom we know to be a great deal less chauvinistic than other men.
     
    Well done! Your sex finally wised up to the damage you dealt as good little soldiers of the neo-liberal agenda! I mean, you only realized that because it was directly impacting your sex negatively and young white women still buy into that drivel when their votes would be essential to changing policy now.

    Why exactly is this supposed to be a positive for women wanting into nascent right wing and nationalist movements? "Guys, I fucked up, but I'm better now! Can I join your club?"

    Replies: @Rosie

    , @Alden
    @Rosie

    Wyatt’s just another Seth Rogen Woody Allen look alike MAN OF UNZ who uses the site in lieu of psychiatry to complain about his social sexual inadequacies. A real man would not be whining to strangers on a website about the numerous White women who done him wrong.

    What a bunch of nerd creep wimps the MEN OF UNZ are. I know some extreme White Nationalist men and these nerds aren’t White Nationalists. They are just assholes who can’t get laid.

    The MEN OF UNZ should establish their own website for White women hating losers like themselves. My sons were more masculine at age 6 than these loser creeps are.

  173. @Steve Sailer
    @Alden

    Why are all these commenters complaining that the run-of-the-mill Conventional Wisdom-espousing woman in the article can't possibly exist?

    Replies: @Rosie, @black sea, @Ghost of Bull Moose, @Alden, @Wyatt

    Why are all these commenters complaining that the run-of-the-mill Conventional Wisdom-espousing woman in the article can’t possibly exist?

    Because the character isn’t really that believable. Only liberal women talk like that, and liberal women don’t have three kids.

    I certainly believe she exists, but I agree with the commenter that said this reporter had to go through several normal mothers before she found this one.

  174. @Rosie
    @Wyatt


    Non-sequitur. The contention you made was that billionaires are the persons of importance and that they need to be acting. BLM is just the latest in a series of movements designed to destabilize the United States. Individual jews marching in it will do fuck all, but billionaire Jewish backers like George Soros have a massive impact.
     
    This is incoherent rambling. I asked you how you know that the women you see at BLM protests are not Jewish? You did not give me an answer, because you don't know. The Jew defense either works, or it doesn't. You don't get to use it to defend men and then deny that it applies to women.


    Usual suspects. ADL, SPLC and the media. Iowa Rep. Steve King was thoroughly ruined by a media blitz and pressure from the Jewish watchdog groups just for saying that America’s young can’t be replaced by other people. Any person with a semblance of power who openly advocates for white people or white interests will be systematically ruined. Even tangential support for unity (as in the case of Terry Crews advocating neutrality and reconciliation) results in backlash. The situation in America has become so hostile to white interest that anyone, especially powerful people, will be shut down at all costs, even if it means violating basic rights of free speech.
     
    And whose fault is that? KMac seems to be still alive and breathing. Why couldn't a billionaire weather the storm? Where are all the untouchable tenured academics?

    Women are one of the Jewish golems. Like blacks, it’s terribly easy to convince them of their own victimhood, their own tragedy and their entitlement to other people’s wealth.
     
    This is patently false. White women have not believed themselves to be victims for a long time. We are as likely to oppose affirmative action as White men, less likely than women of other races to consider ourselves feminists, and nearly as likely as White men to attribute women's lower professional achievement to our own own choices.

    I have posted evidence to support these claims repeatedly on this site.


    Women don’t make movements to serve a greater purpose. They make and enter movements to serve themselves. Gamergate showed that was the case with multiple game journalist women trying to shut down gaming to protect a whore. Intersectional feminism showed that was the case with useless, well paid feminists latching onto other people’s movements to stay relevant.
     
    Here, as usual, you offer nothing but unjustifiably broad generalizations about women.

    Can you tell me what it is that women could bring to an ethno-nationalist movement? Do you know of any women who could even make a convincing argument to someone on the fence, much less humiliate a soc-prog retard on a public stage?
     
    I certainly could, but never mind that. You are not entitled to dictate the standard for determining women's participation in politics. I can't tell you what "women" could bring. I can only tell you what a particular woman could bring in light of her own unique qualities.

    Ican tell you all the problems women have brought to prior movements,
     You keep saying that, but you haven't provided any evidence to support your claims.

    but there’s enough condescension coming from you that I think you’re more concerned about the offense you’ve taken than learning a position that isn’t favorable to you.

    And that’s the point.
     
    Projection.

    Replies: @Rosie, @Wyatt, @Alden

    less likely than women of other races to consider ourselves feminists

    Correction: White women are more likely to identify as “not feminist” than women of other races. This is unsurprising, of course, because many of us can see that organized feminism targets our own men, whom we know to be a great deal less chauvinistic than other men.

  175. @Steve Sailer
    @Alden

    Why are all these commenters complaining that the run-of-the-mill Conventional Wisdom-espousing woman in the article can't possibly exist?

    Replies: @Rosie, @black sea, @Ghost of Bull Moose, @Alden, @Wyatt

    Because, from a journalistic standpoint, a source that’s too good to be true probably isn’t. But maybe the reporter fed her her lines, which she dutifully repeated back to him. Also, it was published in the New York Times, which ceased to be a fact-based journal some decades go.

  176. @Steve Sailer
    @Alden

    Why are all these commenters complaining that the run-of-the-mill Conventional Wisdom-espousing woman in the article can't possibly exist?

    Replies: @Rosie, @black sea, @Ghost of Bull Moose, @Alden, @Wyatt

    For one thing, she was a lifetime one-issue voter on abortion who has joined the party of late-term abortion on demand due to a “difficult pregnancy.” Women who miscarry or have close calls with their babies just do not suddenly get enthusiastic about abortion on demand including late-term. If anything they go the other way.

    The whole time she was a one-issue voter, she also knew her home town was full of ‘racists,’ but she didn’t care because she opposed abortion. Now she really cares racism and ‘climate change.’ She’s now a multi-issue voter with Times-approved views on all the right issues. In an election year where must win white women, they need 1,000s like her to switch sides.

    She became a Democrat and thendecided to leave a job in chemical engineering to home school her kids? Come on. She became a liberal but now doesn’t trust the public schools?

    This guy wrote the article and then went to find the people the article was about.

    • Replies: @Alden
    @Ghost of Bull Moose

    I don’t believe he even found a real woman. He wrote the article. Then he may or may not have spoken to one or two women.


    That alleged interview with Mr Johnson of the building trades union, just absolutely totally can’t be true.

    The entire construction industry, from Bechtel, Turner, Kiewit to day laborers is firmly democrat despite their conventional Christian middle class personal lives.

    The industry has run the figures again and again, for more than 100 years, Democrat administrations are better for construction at all levels than Republicans.
    Mr Johnson might vote Republican, but no construction company owner or construction union employee would ever ever tell anyone that the brothers were voting republican. For the construction industry, it’s hold your nose and vote democrat. Or at least don’t tell anyone you’re not voting democrat

    Plus, it’s a NYSLIMES article. If it’s in the SLIMES it must be a lie.

    Replies: @Art Deco

  177. @Steve Sailer
    @The Germ Theory of Disease

    Jordan has vices, like gambling, that are offshoots of his extreme competitiveness and desire to constantly win. But cocaine would have just gotten in the way of Jordan winning, so he didn't do it. I presume the % of NBA players on cocaine dropped considerably over the course of the 1980s, in part just because you needed your best effort to have a hope of stopping Jordan. The quality of the lesser games tended to improve over the course of the decade.

    Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease, @Abe

    “his extreme competitiveness and desire to constantly win”

    That may be so; I wouldn’t claim to be an expert on a guy I met only once and rather briefly. Still, when you come into contact with people who’ve achieved greatness in their field, you tend to pay attention to all the details of what they do and say, because even little things offer clues about their genius. The vibe I got from Jordan was not that he was hyper-competitive, it was that he felt he had been given a special particular gift, and thought he had an obligation to develop it and use it wisely. He gave off the sense of a guy who knew that he towered over his colleagues, and felt a sort of noblesse oblige about how to handle that kind of unusual status. But that’s just one reporter’s opinion.

    • Replies: @BB753
    @The Germ Theory of Disease

    I had to go back to the previous comments just to be sure you weren't mentioning Jordan Peterson, lol!

    https://youtu.be/74Nadqz41Es

    Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease

  178. @The Germ Theory of Disease
    @Steve Sailer

    "his extreme competitiveness and desire to constantly win"

    That may be so; I wouldn't claim to be an expert on a guy I met only once and rather briefly. Still, when you come into contact with people who've achieved greatness in their field, you tend to pay attention to all the details of what they do and say, because even little things offer clues about their genius. The vibe I got from Jordan was not that he was hyper-competitive, it was that he felt he had been given a special particular gift, and thought he had an obligation to develop it and use it wisely. He gave off the sense of a guy who knew that he towered over his colleagues, and felt a sort of noblesse oblige about how to handle that kind of unusual status. But that's just one reporter's opinion.

    Replies: @BB753

    I had to go back to the previous comments just to be sure you weren’t mentioning Jordan Peterson, lol!

    • Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease
    @BB753

    I'm not convinced that Jordan Peterson towers over anything, except maybe the dust bunnies in his bedroom. (Vox Day is a bit more vehement on the subject, but he seems delightfully unaware that he's as hilarious as JP, just in a different way.)

    Couldn't say much about Jordan Peterson, other than that he's an odd duck, because I've only seen about ten minutes of video of him, and read maybe thirty paragraphs of his tiresome weirdo ramblings. That was quite enough. He sounds like a bizarre over-educated, hyper-associative babbler: a smart teenager on MDMA who's stayed up all night listening to Richard Thompson records and reading Ezra Pound, Nietzsche and Cesar Vallejo, and has a brilliant theory about how they're all connected.

    That's great, Jordan, I'm sure it's brilliant, but unfortunately I'm late for my root canal, gotta go!

    Replies: @BB753

  179. @Steve in Greensboro
    @BB753

    You believe that women belong home raising children. I believe that also. And it happens to be the truth.

    Feminism is for fat, ugly women who don't bathe.

    Replies: @BB753

    Alas, feminism has become the norm for 99.99 % of women, ugly or beautiful, thin or fat, un bathed or otherwise!

  180. @Muggles
    @Roderick Spode

    >>I’m yawning over here. The Vichy government was the real French Resistance, facing off against the real occupying (((power))) for which the “French Resistance” were useful idiots.<<

    Normally I don't do ad hominem replies here. But this is sick.

    No one in France, other than a handful of jihadi "refugees," would agree with you.

    That Hitler worship disease you have is classic Stage 4 dementia.

    Likewise for your "fans" here.

    Replies: @Roderick Spode, @BB753

    Not so: JMLP is still alive. Respect the eyepatch.

  181. @Alden
    I hope Ms Bourn will make enough money to support her sons when they’re 45, 42, and 37 years old, totally unemployable because they’re White men.

    Replies: @Art Deco

    Her sons won’t be unemployable. They may be under court order to make support payments to the dreadful women with whom they’ve been involved (in order to provide for children whom they’re seldom permitted to see and who give them lip), but they’ll be working. They’ll even accede to their mother’s demands for attention; they just won’t take her seriously.

    • Replies: @Alden
    @Art Deco

    So you had a bad involvement with a woman, , don’t want to support your kids and the kids don’t like you. Sounds like every black man in the country.

    Replies: @Art Deco

  182. @bruce county
    @Achmed E. Newman

    The first Skynard album I ever bought was the live "One More (For) From The Road... Live at the Fox Theater.
    Incredible..Sounded amazing on my little Dynaco tube amp over my Altec Lansing A7-500's Votts..

    I'm as hot as a fox in a forest fire...

    Replies: @Ben tillman

    Same here. I bought Second Helping later, but the version of this song I so frequently listened too while lifting weights in my bedroom as a 14/15-year-old was from that live album.

    • Replies: @bruce county
    @Ben tillman

    I was lucky enough to get my hands on the original "Street Survivors" album. The one with the burning streetscape. 1977 I believe. It was released just days before the plane crash..I picked up the alternate album cover several months later and preserved the original.

    Whiskey bottles and brand new cars....Oak tree you're in my way......

    Replies: @ben tillman

  183. @Joe Stalin
    @Abe


    Sorry, typo/autocorrect- AR-15 aka M-16 – I think it was still even called the AR-15 at the time of the Battle of Ia Drang depicted in the book/movie
     

    [...] took place November 14–16, 1965 at LZ X-Ray, located at the eastern foot of the Chu Pong Massif in the central highlands of Vietnam.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Ia_Drang
     

    First Mass Issued AR-15

    The Brownells XBRN16E1® Rifle replicates the design of the first AR-15 to be issued in mass numbers to US Army on the ground in Vietnam.

    The XM16E1 was adopted by the US Army in 1963 and was issued to troops in 1965. It was the first rifle to feature the now prominent forward assist, and had other features that would lead to the M16A1. The XM16E1 was the first model also with the classic black triangle handguard, and prominently featured a 3 prong flash hider at the muzzle. This was also the last US issued AR-15 type rifle to include some variants with chrome bolt carrier groups.

    https://www.brownells.com/.aspx/bapid=616/ClientPage/brownells-16e1
     
    Retro XM16E1 rifles if you need an AR for fun.

    https://www.brownells.com/.aspx/bapid=616/ClientPage/brownells-16e1

    https://cdn-fsly.yottaa.net/53ff2f503c881650e20004c9/www.brownells.com/v~4b.10f/userdocs/Miscellaneous/brownells-retro-rifle-line/xbrn16e1u/gallery/078-000-401c.jpg?yocs=p_

    Replies: @nokangaroos

    The actual AR15 had no forward assist and 1-in-14in. rifling twist (changed to 1-in-12 on the M-16 which ruined the major sales point, the TTE M-193 i.e. the bullets no longer tumbled on impact). Only a few thousand were issued to Air Force and Special Forces; it´s a bit like the AK-47 – not too many were made with the milled receiver (the Chinese sell replicas though), and the stamped is called AKM 😀

  184. @Steve Sailer
    @Alden

    Why are all these commenters complaining that the run-of-the-mill Conventional Wisdom-espousing woman in the article can't possibly exist?

    Replies: @Rosie, @black sea, @Ghost of Bull Moose, @Alden, @Wyatt

    I used to read daily newspapers. I recognize the style, technique whatever it’s called.

    Who watched the entire DNC TV show? Very few. What with the EEOC extortion threats to hire women engineers, even White women if a non White can’t be found or imported, what’s a woman engineer doing staying at home with the kids? What does the husband do that he can support a non working wife and 3 kids?

    The man the writer/liar claims to have interviewed is even more bogus. No family that has 3 TVs with Fox on all day watched anti White Netflix shows.

  185. @Art Deco
    @Alden

    Her sons won't be unemployable. They may be under court order to make support payments to the dreadful women with whom they've been involved (in order to provide for children whom they're seldom permitted to see and who give them lip), but they'll be working. They'll even accede to their mother's demands for attention; they just won't take her seriously.

    Replies: @Alden

    So you had a bad involvement with a woman, , don’t want to support your kids and the kids don’t like you. Sounds like every black man in the country.

    • Replies: @Art Deco
    @Alden

    I'm realistic about contemporary family relations. This tends to bother people who fancy they should be free from any sort of accountability, even impersonal criticism.

    Replies: @Alden

  186. @BB753
    @The Germ Theory of Disease

    I had to go back to the previous comments just to be sure you weren't mentioning Jordan Peterson, lol!

    https://youtu.be/74Nadqz41Es

    Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease

    I’m not convinced that Jordan Peterson towers over anything, except maybe the dust bunnies in his bedroom. (Vox Day is a bit more vehement on the subject, but he seems delightfully unaware that he’s as hilarious as JP, just in a different way.)

    Couldn’t say much about Jordan Peterson, other than that he’s an odd duck, because I’ve only seen about ten minutes of video of him, and read maybe thirty paragraphs of his tiresome weirdo ramblings. That was quite enough. He sounds like a bizarre over-educated, hyper-associative babbler: a smart teenager on MDMA who’s stayed up all night listening to Richard Thompson records and reading Ezra Pound, Nietzsche and Cesar Vallejo, and has a brilliant theory about how they’re all connected.

    That’s great, Jordan, I’m sure it’s brilliant, but unfortunately I’m late for my root canal, gotta go!

    • Replies: @BB753
    @The Germ Theory of Disease

    I was being sarcastic. Jordan Peterson is a living joke with some insights perhaps.

  187. @JohnnyWalker123

    NYT: Biden-Voting Mom Worries Her 3 White Sons, Ages 8, 5, and 1, Have Too Much White Privilege

     

    No. That's not correct.

    Read what she said.

    “It’s hard raising white men in America,” she said of her three boys, ages 8, 5 and 16 months. “You want to understand that they understand their position as an ally.”

     

    If you read between the lines, here's what she's saying.

    -Non-Whites (especially Blacks) are gaining the upper hand in America and ascending to power.
    -Whites (especially White males) are on the losing side of a Civil War.
    -This White mom wants her young White sons to become abandon their losing team (Team White) and join the winning team (Team Non-White).
    -By becoming an "ally" of Team Non-White, her sons can survive and thrive in this new social order. Meanwhile, more traditional Whites will be marginalized, both socially and economically.

    To put it more simply, this mom wants to throw other White people under the bus, in the process enriching herself and her sons. She's declaring that her family are "Good Whites" who should be given cool jobs and be allowed to live in peace. If the protesters want to harass and beat up anyone, they should target "Bad Whites."

    This woman isn't attacking her sons. This woman is attacking YOUR sons.

    The White sled is being pursued by a pack of hungry Black wolves. So this woman is throwing YOUR sons out to be torn to pieces, sparing her own progeny.

    Back during WWII, Nazis conquered France. Some French chose to collaborate, forming the pro-govt Vichy govt. Some French fought back, forming the French Resistance. Those in the Vichy govt were "allies" of Germans, helping them to persecute the French Resistance. In return, French Vichy "allies" were allowed to live their live in peace and prosperity.

    In today's America, Jews and Blacks are Nazis. White Democrats and White Cuckservative are supporters of the Vichy regime. Trump supporters are the French resistance.

    This mom is declaring she wants her sons to grow up to be supporters of the Vichy regime, as it's the most pragmatic choice.

    During WWII (2020), a Nazi (Jewish) news columnist wrote an an interesting article in the Das Reich newspaper (New York Times). The Nazi (Jew) favorably portrayed a Vichy collaborationist (woke White Democrat) mother, while spitting vitriol at her stepfather, who's a supporter of the French Resistance (anti-PC Conservatism).

    Replies: @Anon, @RichardTaylor, @Roderick Spode, @Lowe, @Rosie, @Ghost of Bull Moose, @Corvinus, @Libre

    This isn’t about whites vs nonwhites. Nonwhites couldn’t carry out any sort of war like this. They’d have their heads blown off. This is a way between whites and whites. One group of whites uses nonwhites to aid in their fight. And do be aware that while Jews are very influential on one side, it is not entirely their fight. This conflict goes back much further than Jews presence.

  188. @Ghost of Bull Moose
    @Steve Sailer

    For one thing, she was a lifetime one-issue voter on abortion who has joined the party of late-term abortion on demand due to a "difficult pregnancy." Women who miscarry or have close calls with their babies just do not suddenly get enthusiastic about abortion on demand including late-term. If anything they go the other way.

    The whole time she was a one-issue voter, she also knew her home town was full of 'racists,' but she didn't care because she opposed abortion. Now she really cares racism and 'climate change.' She's now a multi-issue voter with Times-approved views on all the right issues. In an election year where must win white women, they need 1,000s like her to switch sides.

    She became a Democrat and thendecided to leave a job in chemical engineering to home school her kids? Come on. She became a liberal but now doesn't trust the public schools?

    This guy wrote the article and then went to find the people the article was about.

    Replies: @Alden

    I don’t believe he even found a real woman. He wrote the article. Then he may or may not have spoken to one or two women.

    That alleged interview with Mr Johnson of the building trades union, just absolutely totally can’t be true.

    The entire construction industry, from Bechtel, Turner, Kiewit to day laborers is firmly democrat despite their conventional Christian middle class personal lives.

    The industry has run the figures again and again, for more than 100 years, Democrat administrations are better for construction at all levels than Republicans.
    Mr Johnson might vote Republican, but no construction company owner or construction union employee would ever ever tell anyone that the brothers were voting republican. For the construction industry, it’s hold your nose and vote democrat. Or at least don’t tell anyone you’re not voting democrat

    Plus, it’s a NYSLIMES article. If it’s in the SLIMES it must be a lie.

    • Replies: @Art Deco
    @Alden

    A person of that name lives outside of Columbus. Both her father and her step-father can be identified from various databases. The people are real enough. That's not the fabricated portion. If my own experience with the media (30 years past) is any guide, conscientiousness and integrity are inversely related to professional prestige.

    Replies: @Alden

  189. @Anonymous
    The typical female brain is hardwired to comply with 'dominance'. Surely, most male iStevers can cast their minds back to kindergarten or grade school and remember, even at that tender age, the vast behavioral gulf between girls and boys, and just how much the innate feminine wish to please authority annoyed you.
    The dominant narrative is white racial inferiority, thus females comply with it.
    It appears that this genetically determined unconscious urge to comply with authority and dominance - which doubtless has been honed by millennia of evolutionary behavior - is stronger, in the female at least, than the familial link.

    Replies: @BB753, @The Germ Theory of Disease, @Libre, @Alden

    Very good point that i should append to my above comment. This isn’t even a war between whites and whites. It’s a war between white men and white men. We simply need to convert or defeat the other white men, and we will reestablish our dominant position. The rest will fall into place. Women will cleave to us and nonwhites will know their place.

  190. @Lagertha
    @Mr. Anon

    incredibly stupid and uneducated women like this creep should have not been allowed to have children. One good point about working women in Democrat cities would be if they became so infertile that they can not conceive anymore. Similarly, I would be fine with every leftist Coastal woman to have an abortion way into their 40's - Democrat-voting white women do not deserve to have sons. Democrat women do not deserve to have children.

    I love my sons, and I so, sooo hate American leftist/Democrat women. They are monsters and will harm their sons. They are a danger to humanity. They need to be censored and shamed forever...hahhahhahahaaaa!

    Replies: @jsm

    Similarly, I would be fine with every leftist Coastal woman to have an abortion way into their 40’s – Democrat-voting white women do not deserve to have sons. Democrat women do not deserve to have children.

    Aye.

    Heavenly Father, if Jesus need tarry a bit longer, could you please, in the meantime, send an epidemic of Asherman’s syndrome? Thanks!

    • Replies: @Lagertha
    @jsm

    weak men are weak men who never understood strong women.

  191. @Steve Sailer
    @The Germ Theory of Disease

    Jordan has vices, like gambling, that are offshoots of his extreme competitiveness and desire to constantly win. But cocaine would have just gotten in the way of Jordan winning, so he didn't do it. I presume the % of NBA players on cocaine dropped considerably over the course of the 1980s, in part just because you needed your best effort to have a hope of stopping Jordan. The quality of the lesser games tended to improve over the course of the decade.

    Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease, @Abe

    Jordan has vices, like gambling, that are offshoots of his extreme competitiveness and desire to constantly win.

    I feel like the impertinent grasshopper correcting the master here, since you, Steve, were the one who originally WOKE me to the existence of the ‘Jordan rules’ or whatever they’re called- i.e. the effective information blackout on Jordan’s personal life by a lapdog sports media desperate to retain access above all else- cf. the almost total memory-holing of Jordan’s divorce ~10 years ago even as the fall-out from it (His Airness reduced to schlepping Hanes T-shirts and underwear on TV to get back some of the money lost after an adverse divorce settlement) was staring us in the face.

    The actual quote (from MJ himself) in LAST DANCE was about Jordan walking in on a preseason team coke party in Peoria (“Peoria coke party” being the saddest 3 words in the universe next to “Joyce Carol Oates”), seeing “lines” over here, weed over there, women over there (probably a mixture of skinny, lively black girls and hollow-eyed, chunky, bleached blonde white girls and every one of them with big hair- basically a backup dancing troupe for a Rick James music video) and him immediately skeedaddling it right out of there, it taking the last ounce of gumption in his 6’6” lanky frame not to run back to Carolina so he could be fishing with Oppie and Andy by Sunday.

    So, yes, thanks for the reality check- given Jordan’s extremely high level of performance over 15+ years, he probably was not doing coke. I find it extremely hard to believe he has not banging out wannabe Rick James girls in the same time period, and impossible to believe in his Vegas/post-NBA years he was not gambling, banging 100’s of skanks, doing God knows what drugs, and cruising the strip with Tom Hanks for homeless albinos to take home and and then have sit on his chest while they ripped out his toe nails.

    Meaning, LAST DANCE’s attempt to still sell Jordan’s wholesome, 90’s era SPACE JAM teddybear image is a bit ridiculous given all that has come out since, given all that you yourself, Steve, have done to educate us about the slimy MO of entertainment media, given all Trump has taught us all about the slimy MO of ALL MEDIA (“found Duranty until proven innocent”). Fare thee well, young man, and jock sniff no more.

    • Replies: @Alden
    @Abe

    Blackball news. Kareem Al Jabar’s octoroon son age 28 , was just arrested for beating up and seriously injuring a 60 year old White neighbor who asked Jabar jr to bring in his garbage cans instead of leaving them on the driveway all week. Happened in San Clemente Ca. At least Orange county district attorney office hasn’t been turned into a Soros nest of Marxist snakes yet.

    Jabar jr wears a huge medium brown Afro and beard to disguise his White Caucasian European appearance

    Replies: @The Last Real Calvinist

  192. @Rosie
    @Whiskey


    But White women tingles for black criminal uber alles. Blm knows what it is doing. About 85% if White women tingle for black criminal s. Highlighting thugs is a feature for tingles. Not a bug.

    Biden and Harris especially are likely to get 85% of White women voters. Off tingles for black thugs.
     
    I know Whiskey's feelings don't care about my facts, but for those who actually care...

    https://cms.qz.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/ethnic-preferences2.png?w=1200&h=900&crop=1&strip=all&quality=75

    Replies: @Alden

    What’s funny is this is just a standard NYLIES article. He made up the article and then went to Ohio and may or may not have spoken with any real women.

    But the nerd wimp repressed gay misogynist White women hating MEN OF UNZ fell for the lies. Totally naive morons to believe a word in the NYLIES. And that’s their reason to start a blast of White women hatred because the repressed gay woman less child less feckless useless clueless Woody Allen Seth Rogen look alikes just have to blast their psycho sexual problems all over the internet for the world to see. They should suffer in silence instead of using Steve’s articles as group therapy for creeps who can’t get laid.

    They should start their own blog IHateWhiteWomenblogspot.

    • Replies: @Steve Sailer
    @Alden

    Why assume that some person spouting the conventional wisdom is made up?

    Replies: @Alden, @Undocumented Shopper, @Rosie, @The Last Real Calvinist

  193. @Rosie
    @Wyatt


    Non-sequitur. The contention you made was that billionaires are the persons of importance and that they need to be acting. BLM is just the latest in a series of movements designed to destabilize the United States. Individual jews marching in it will do fuck all, but billionaire Jewish backers like George Soros have a massive impact.
     
    This is incoherent rambling. I asked you how you know that the women you see at BLM protests are not Jewish? You did not give me an answer, because you don't know. The Jew defense either works, or it doesn't. You don't get to use it to defend men and then deny that it applies to women.


    Usual suspects. ADL, SPLC and the media. Iowa Rep. Steve King was thoroughly ruined by a media blitz and pressure from the Jewish watchdog groups just for saying that America’s young can’t be replaced by other people. Any person with a semblance of power who openly advocates for white people or white interests will be systematically ruined. Even tangential support for unity (as in the case of Terry Crews advocating neutrality and reconciliation) results in backlash. The situation in America has become so hostile to white interest that anyone, especially powerful people, will be shut down at all costs, even if it means violating basic rights of free speech.
     
    And whose fault is that? KMac seems to be still alive and breathing. Why couldn't a billionaire weather the storm? Where are all the untouchable tenured academics?

    Women are one of the Jewish golems. Like blacks, it’s terribly easy to convince them of their own victimhood, their own tragedy and their entitlement to other people’s wealth.
     
    This is patently false. White women have not believed themselves to be victims for a long time. We are as likely to oppose affirmative action as White men, less likely than women of other races to consider ourselves feminists, and nearly as likely as White men to attribute women's lower professional achievement to our own own choices.

    I have posted evidence to support these claims repeatedly on this site.


    Women don’t make movements to serve a greater purpose. They make and enter movements to serve themselves. Gamergate showed that was the case with multiple game journalist women trying to shut down gaming to protect a whore. Intersectional feminism showed that was the case with useless, well paid feminists latching onto other people’s movements to stay relevant.
     
    Here, as usual, you offer nothing but unjustifiably broad generalizations about women.

    Can you tell me what it is that women could bring to an ethno-nationalist movement? Do you know of any women who could even make a convincing argument to someone on the fence, much less humiliate a soc-prog retard on a public stage?
     
    I certainly could, but never mind that. You are not entitled to dictate the standard for determining women's participation in politics. I can't tell you what "women" could bring. I can only tell you what a particular woman could bring in light of her own unique qualities.

    Ican tell you all the problems women have brought to prior movements,
     You keep saying that, but you haven't provided any evidence to support your claims.

    but there’s enough condescension coming from you that I think you’re more concerned about the offense you’ve taken than learning a position that isn’t favorable to you.

    And that’s the point.
     
    Projection.

    Replies: @Rosie, @Wyatt, @Alden

    This is incoherent rambling. I asked you how you know that the women you see at BLM protests are not Jewish? You did not give me an answer, because you don’t know. The Jew defense either works, or it doesn’t. You don’t get to use it to defend men and then deny that it applies to women.

    It’s not, actually. As I said, your contention was regarding billionaires. When I pointed out that large numbers of “white” billionaires are jews, you immediately went to asking how many BLM women were jews. That’s irrelevant because both your contention and mine was on financing and support. You didn’t address the problem of belligerent Jewish billionaires; you shifted the goalposts to try and point out something tangential. Beyond that, population is

    And whose fault is that? KMac seems to be still alive and breathing. Why couldn’t a billionaire weather the storm? Where are all the untouchable tenured academics?

    The jews? I don’t know what you’re asking. If there weren’t Ashkenazi jews in America, the ADL, SPLC and AIPAC wouldn’t exist. Jewish subversion is designed specifically to silence white resistance through public shame and financial disenfranchisement. Are you going to ask why whites couldn’t resist subversives who could ruin their lives for even speaking out?

    Papa John got dismissed for saying a naughty word. Man is a billionaire. All he did was use Power Word: Nigger and they fired his ass. I imagine someone that says “White people have a right to their own nation” would be subject to criminal investigations, threats from our long nosed friends, disciplinary actions from executive boards and public boycotts condoned by the right. Also, we’ve seen discrediting, failure to renew contracts and slandering of professors. Richard Lynn is the most prominent one I know. He lost his title because of the woke era for even daring to posit that there are racial differences.

    This is patently false. White women have not believed themselves to be victims for a long time. We are as likely to oppose affirmative action as White men, less likely than women of other races to consider ourselves feminists, and nearly as likely as White men to attribute women’s lower professional achievement to our own own choices.

    I have posted evidence to support these claims repeatedly on this site.

    Cool. Link the post or the url. It’s not hard and you want to challenge me on a lack of citations by failing to cite anything yourself. Your assertion is false.

    Here, as usual, you offer nothing but unjustifiably broad generalizations about women.

    And you failed to refute it. You’re attempting to dismiss the point without actually showing that it’s not true. Generalizations hold broad truth for a reason. The phenomenon I described is readily observable. There are at least half a dozen documented events and groups where women have wormed their way into a movement or organization and things went to shit. Hell, comic books has had a woman problem these last few years. Want to watch some videos with me as Richard Meyers shits on SJW women in comics ruining the industry that even Rob Liefeld couldn’t?

    I certainly could, but never mind that.

    You could, but you won’t. You would cite things, but you already cited them. It feels like I’m arguing with one of those blacks who think blacks invented everything. Lady, if a man was arguing the way you are, they would have been dog piled already.

    You are not entitled to dictate the standard for determining women’s participation in politics. I can’t tell you what “women” could bring. I can only tell you what a particular woman could bring in light of her own unique qualities.

    No, but I can demand you prove your assertions when you claim that mine are wrong. You’ve proven this before, but you don’t want to show that you have. You’re willing to commit the time to reply, but not willing to show why you’re right despite bitching at me for not citing things.

    As for what you can tell me about a particular woman’s unique qualities, do it. Come on, do it. Do something at least.

    Correction: White women are more likely to identify as “not feminist” than women of other races. This is unsurprising, of course, because many of us can see that organized feminism targets our own men, whom we know to be a great deal less chauvinistic than other men.

    Well done! Your sex finally wised up to the damage you dealt as good little soldiers of the neo-liberal agenda! I mean, you only realized that because it was directly impacting your sex negatively and young white women still buy into that drivel when their votes would be essential to changing policy now.

    Why exactly is this supposed to be a positive for women wanting into nascent right wing and nationalist movements? “Guys, I fucked up, but I’m better now! Can I join your club?”

    • Replies: @Rosie
    @Wyatt


    Cool. Link the post or the url. It’s not hard and you want to challenge me on a lack of citations by failing to cite anything yourself. Your assertion is false.

     

    Since you couldn't be bothered to do your own research, here:

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/national/feminism-project/poll/

    41% of women (and 52% of men) believe feminism unfairly blames men for women's challenges.

    And here:

    https://www.vox.com/2016/5/25/11682950/fisher-supreme-court-white-women-affirmative-action

    And here: White women more likely than women of other groups to say "I don't identify as a feminist."

    https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/410/cpsprodpb/BE95/production/_105498784_feminist_survey_by_ethnicity-nc.png
  194. @Alden
    @Rosie

    What’s funny is this is just a standard NYLIES article. He made up the article and then went to Ohio and may or may not have spoken with any real women.

    But the nerd wimp repressed gay misogynist White women hating MEN OF UNZ fell for the lies. Totally naive morons to believe a word in the NYLIES. And that’s their reason to start a blast of White women hatred because the repressed gay woman less child less feckless useless clueless Woody Allen Seth Rogen look alikes just have to blast their psycho sexual problems all over the internet for the world to see. They should suffer in silence instead of using Steve’s articles as group therapy for creeps who can’t get laid.

    They should start their own blog IHateWhiteWomenblogspot.

    Replies: @Steve Sailer

    Why assume that some person spouting the conventional wisdom is made up?

    • Replies: @Alden
    @Steve Sailer

    Because it’s in the lying NYSLIMES. If it’s in the NYSLIMES it’s a lie.

    , @Undocumented Shopper
    @Steve Sailer

    You can use Intelius to verify if a person whose name and town are given, exists.
    (That's what you get from the free version of Intelius but more can be found if you pay, you can even find the address.)
    According to Intelius, there is a Dan Moore aged 60 in Newton Falls and a Kelley Boorn aged 34 in Columbus.
    It looks like these people are real.

    , @Rosie
    @Steve Sailer


    Why assume that some person spouting the conventional wisdom is made up?
     
    Alden disputes precisely your claim that this woman's views are "conventional wisdom." I'm not sure, but I think I detect an element of circularity here. We know it's the conventional wisdom because of women like this, and we can assume this woman exists because it's the conventional wisdom.

    This is precisely how the media is able to create a false picture of reality.
    , @The Last Real Calvinist
    @Steve Sailer

    There's no reason to suppose the NYT is making anybody up. Even a small town will have somebody available to supply the kinds of quotations the Narrativists are looking for on that particular day.

    For example, as we've discussed here in the past, the NYT is fascinated with my ancestral homeland, i.e. Sioux County in NW Iowa, because it's one of the most Christian places in the USA, and also one of the most reliably Republican-voting.

    Earlier this month the NYT sent out an Intrepid Explorer/Low Primate Anthropologist/Ostensible Reporter to Sioux Center, which, as the name implies, is right in the middle of Sioux County.

    The story (link HERE) is a nasty, condescending calumny, implying that Sioux County Reformed Christians vote for Trump because they live in perpetual fear that they're losing their heretofore overwhelming cultural and political 'power' (LOL). The article relentlessly undermines any possibility that Sioux Country Christians' faith is real; the only possible explanation for their actions is seeking earthly power.

    The article extensively quotes several people who are unusually conservative, even by Sioux County standards. I'm sure those people thought they were communicating clearly what they believe and why they act as they do, but of course their words and personal stories are twisted and exploited to fit the narrative.

    The NYT's core readers will have their bigotry reinforced, making them feel good, since it's 'obvious' that all those Christer hicks are just power-hungry hypocrites. This kind of article also serves as subtly effective battlespace prep for the upcoming election, since Iowa is again a purple state.

    The NYT doesn't need to make anybody up when they're writing this kind of article. They're very skilled at turning any quotations they get into the narrative line they want. I give them that much credit at least.

  195. @Rosie
    @Wyatt


    Non-sequitur. The contention you made was that billionaires are the persons of importance and that they need to be acting. BLM is just the latest in a series of movements designed to destabilize the United States. Individual jews marching in it will do fuck all, but billionaire Jewish backers like George Soros have a massive impact.
     
    This is incoherent rambling. I asked you how you know that the women you see at BLM protests are not Jewish? You did not give me an answer, because you don't know. The Jew defense either works, or it doesn't. You don't get to use it to defend men and then deny that it applies to women.


    Usual suspects. ADL, SPLC and the media. Iowa Rep. Steve King was thoroughly ruined by a media blitz and pressure from the Jewish watchdog groups just for saying that America’s young can’t be replaced by other people. Any person with a semblance of power who openly advocates for white people or white interests will be systematically ruined. Even tangential support for unity (as in the case of Terry Crews advocating neutrality and reconciliation) results in backlash. The situation in America has become so hostile to white interest that anyone, especially powerful people, will be shut down at all costs, even if it means violating basic rights of free speech.
     
    And whose fault is that? KMac seems to be still alive and breathing. Why couldn't a billionaire weather the storm? Where are all the untouchable tenured academics?

    Women are one of the Jewish golems. Like blacks, it’s terribly easy to convince them of their own victimhood, their own tragedy and their entitlement to other people’s wealth.
     
    This is patently false. White women have not believed themselves to be victims for a long time. We are as likely to oppose affirmative action as White men, less likely than women of other races to consider ourselves feminists, and nearly as likely as White men to attribute women's lower professional achievement to our own own choices.

    I have posted evidence to support these claims repeatedly on this site.


    Women don’t make movements to serve a greater purpose. They make and enter movements to serve themselves. Gamergate showed that was the case with multiple game journalist women trying to shut down gaming to protect a whore. Intersectional feminism showed that was the case with useless, well paid feminists latching onto other people’s movements to stay relevant.
     
    Here, as usual, you offer nothing but unjustifiably broad generalizations about women.

    Can you tell me what it is that women could bring to an ethno-nationalist movement? Do you know of any women who could even make a convincing argument to someone on the fence, much less humiliate a soc-prog retard on a public stage?
     
    I certainly could, but never mind that. You are not entitled to dictate the standard for determining women's participation in politics. I can't tell you what "women" could bring. I can only tell you what a particular woman could bring in light of her own unique qualities.

    Ican tell you all the problems women have brought to prior movements,
     You keep saying that, but you haven't provided any evidence to support your claims.

    but there’s enough condescension coming from you that I think you’re more concerned about the offense you’ve taken than learning a position that isn’t favorable to you.

    And that’s the point.
     
    Projection.

    Replies: @Rosie, @Wyatt, @Alden

    Wyatt’s just another Seth Rogen Woody Allen look alike MAN OF UNZ who uses the site in lieu of psychiatry to complain about his social sexual inadequacies. A real man would not be whining to strangers on a website about the numerous White women who done him wrong.

    What a bunch of nerd creep wimps the MEN OF UNZ are. I know some extreme White Nationalist men and these nerds aren’t White Nationalists. They are just assholes who can’t get laid.

    The MEN OF UNZ should establish their own website for White women hating losers like themselves. My sons were more masculine at age 6 than these loser creeps are.

  196. @Steve Sailer
    @Alden

    Why are all these commenters complaining that the run-of-the-mill Conventional Wisdom-espousing woman in the article can't possibly exist?

    Replies: @Rosie, @black sea, @Ghost of Bull Moose, @Alden, @Wyatt

    There’s a micro-meme of “did the Onion write this or is it real?” that’s become mildly pervasive due to the insanity of the day. It explains people’s incredulity at articles that seem too surreal or suspicious. Try this one on for size:

    Progressive rainbow lesbians drive van full of black adoptees off California cliff

    Onion or not Onion?

    It’s no longer possible to tell if something is legit or not right off the bat. The smarties know when something’s up, but they don’t always know for sure. Since the media is just a propaganda outlet now, there’s an overwhelming chance that if one smells shit, there is shit.

  197. @HammerJack
    @Mr. Anon

    Speaking of immigrants and the NYT

    https://i.ibb.co/k4cFdkd/Capture-2020-08-24-02-15-17-2.png

    https://mol.im/a/8656465

    Replies: @HammerJack, @Mr. Peabody, @Dan Hayes, @Cloudbuster, @Anon 2, @Ma Laoshi

    Like all such institutions, the NYT has a habit of forgetting their anti-racism the moment it becomes inconvenient. Trump’s faltering coup in Venezuela is of course all about re-empowering the old white comprador elites. But oil is oil, and you need lots of it to run an empire; so the NYT is all for it, as are Lizzy Warren and Bernie Sanders. And for the right price, the Grey Lady was also quite willing to place an article blaming the 737 MAX crashes on inferior negro pilots. Boeing going bankrupt would be a real downer for American dominance, can’t have that.

    Much has been written about the “first-world feminism” of Hillary and her ilk, which somehow never manages to notice the widows in Libya and places like that. BLM is another expression of the same blinkered, egotistic impulse.

  198. @anon
    @Dago Shoes

    Who’s leading her?

    All of her friends on Fakebook, Twatter and/or Instant-gram, of course.
    Social media is like opiods to most women: numbing and addictive.

    Replies: @The Wild Geese Howard

    Social media is like opiods to most women: numbing and addictive.

    Even worse than that, many have learned how to convert their social media into an income stream.

  199. @Steve Sailer
    @Alden

    Why assume that some person spouting the conventional wisdom is made up?

    Replies: @Alden, @Undocumented Shopper, @Rosie, @The Last Real Calvinist

    Because it’s in the lying NYSLIMES. If it’s in the NYSLIMES it’s a lie.

  200. @Ben tillman
    @bruce county

    Same here. I bought Second Helping later, but the version of this song I so frequently listened too while lifting weights in my bedroom as a 14/15-year-old was from that live album.

    Replies: @bruce county

    I was lucky enough to get my hands on the original “Street Survivors” album. The one with the burning streetscape. 1977 I believe. It was released just days before the plane crash..I picked up the alternate album cover several months later and preserved the original.

    Whiskey bottles and brand new cars….Oak tree you’re in my way……

    • Replies: @ben tillman
    @bruce county

    "Play it pretty for Duane and Berry" -- I can't recall which bootleg that is from (I listen to the Perth, Cardiff, Winterland, and Knebsworth Park versions fairly often), but I will be going to Macon for the first time this fall.

    That album cover brings to mind Who Are You released by the Who less than a year later. The album cover featured Keith Moon sitting backward in a chair marked "not to be taken away". Three weeks after the album's release, Moon was dead.

  201. @Steve Sailer
    @Alden

    Why assume that some person spouting the conventional wisdom is made up?

    Replies: @Alden, @Undocumented Shopper, @Rosie, @The Last Real Calvinist

    You can use Intelius to verify if a person whose name and town are given, exists.
    (That’s what you get from the free version of Intelius but more can be found if you pay, you can even find the address.)
    According to Intelius, there is a Dan Moore aged 60 in Newton Falls and a Kelley Boorn aged 34 in Columbus.
    It looks like these people are real.

  202. @Steve Sailer
    @Alden

    Why assume that some person spouting the conventional wisdom is made up?

    Replies: @Alden, @Undocumented Shopper, @Rosie, @The Last Real Calvinist

    Why assume that some person spouting the conventional wisdom is made up?

    Alden disputes precisely your claim that this woman’s views are “conventional wisdom.” I’m not sure, but I think I detect an element of circularity here. We know it’s the conventional wisdom because of women like this, and we can assume this woman exists because it’s the conventional wisdom.

    This is precisely how the media is able to create a false picture of reality.

  203. @Alden
    @Art Deco

    So you had a bad involvement with a woman, , don’t want to support your kids and the kids don’t like you. Sounds like every black man in the country.

    Replies: @Art Deco

    I’m realistic about contemporary family relations. This tends to bother people who fancy they should be free from any sort of accountability, even impersonal criticism.

    • Replies: @Alden
    @Art Deco

    So men shouldn’t be held accountable and responsible for the children they create? That’s why we’ve got all these black and Hispanic kids on welfare.

    Child supports not a life long burden you know. Like most childless womanless MEN OF UNZ you think children stay children forever and child support never ends.

  204. @Alden
    @Ghost of Bull Moose

    I don’t believe he even found a real woman. He wrote the article. Then he may or may not have spoken to one or two women.


    That alleged interview with Mr Johnson of the building trades union, just absolutely totally can’t be true.

    The entire construction industry, from Bechtel, Turner, Kiewit to day laborers is firmly democrat despite their conventional Christian middle class personal lives.

    The industry has run the figures again and again, for more than 100 years, Democrat administrations are better for construction at all levels than Republicans.
    Mr Johnson might vote Republican, but no construction company owner or construction union employee would ever ever tell anyone that the brothers were voting republican. For the construction industry, it’s hold your nose and vote democrat. Or at least don’t tell anyone you’re not voting democrat

    Plus, it’s a NYSLIMES article. If it’s in the SLIMES it must be a lie.

    Replies: @Art Deco

    A person of that name lives outside of Columbus. Both her father and her step-father can be identified from various databases. The people are real enough. That’s not the fabricated portion. If my own experience with the media (30 years past) is any guide, conscientiousness and integrity are inversely related to professional prestige.

    • Replies: @Alden
    @Art Deco

    I believe you, but I don’t believe a word in the lying NYSLIMES. Many years of reading it’s lies influenced my opinion of the SLIMES

  205. @Reg Cæsar
    @Corvinus


    Although, he says if he doesn’t, then he was cheated. If he wins, there was no cheating. That is nuts!
     
    No different from Team Gore in 2000. (Or was it 2001?) If Al had pulled ahead by one vote on, say, the 137th recount, they would have deemed any 138th recount invalid before it got started.

    Replies: @Corvinus

    Not even remotely an apples to apples comparison.

    • Replies: @fish
    @Corvinus

    You should probably just quit while you are behind.

  206. @The Germ Theory of Disease
    @BB753

    I'm not convinced that Jordan Peterson towers over anything, except maybe the dust bunnies in his bedroom. (Vox Day is a bit more vehement on the subject, but he seems delightfully unaware that he's as hilarious as JP, just in a different way.)

    Couldn't say much about Jordan Peterson, other than that he's an odd duck, because I've only seen about ten minutes of video of him, and read maybe thirty paragraphs of his tiresome weirdo ramblings. That was quite enough. He sounds like a bizarre over-educated, hyper-associative babbler: a smart teenager on MDMA who's stayed up all night listening to Richard Thompson records and reading Ezra Pound, Nietzsche and Cesar Vallejo, and has a brilliant theory about how they're all connected.

    That's great, Jordan, I'm sure it's brilliant, but unfortunately I'm late for my root canal, gotta go!

    Replies: @BB753

    I was being sarcastic. Jordan Peterson is a living joke with some insights perhaps.

  207. @Steve Sailer
    @Alden

    Why assume that some person spouting the conventional wisdom is made up?

    Replies: @Alden, @Undocumented Shopper, @Rosie, @The Last Real Calvinist

    There’s no reason to suppose the NYT is making anybody up. Even a small town will have somebody available to supply the kinds of quotations the Narrativists are looking for on that particular day.

    For example, as we’ve discussed here in the past, the NYT is fascinated with my ancestral homeland, i.e. Sioux County in NW Iowa, because it’s one of the most Christian places in the USA, and also one of the most reliably Republican-voting.

    Earlier this month the NYT sent out an Intrepid Explorer/Low Primate Anthropologist/Ostensible Reporter to Sioux Center, which, as the name implies, is right in the middle of Sioux County.

    The story (link HERE) is a nasty, condescending calumny, implying that Sioux County Reformed Christians vote for Trump because they live in perpetual fear that they’re losing their heretofore overwhelming cultural and political ‘power’ (LOL). The article relentlessly undermines any possibility that Sioux Country Christians’ faith is real; the only possible explanation for their actions is seeking earthly power.

    The article extensively quotes several people who are unusually conservative, even by Sioux County standards. I’m sure those people thought they were communicating clearly what they believe and why they act as they do, but of course their words and personal stories are twisted and exploited to fit the narrative.

    The NYT’s core readers will have their bigotry reinforced, making them feel good, since it’s ‘obvious’ that all those Christer hicks are just power-hungry hypocrites. This kind of article also serves as subtly effective battlespace prep for the upcoming election, since Iowa is again a purple state.

    The NYT doesn’t need to make anybody up when they’re writing this kind of article. They’re very skilled at turning any quotations they get into the narrative line they want. I give them that much credit at least.

  208. @bruce county
    @Ben tillman

    I was lucky enough to get my hands on the original "Street Survivors" album. The one with the burning streetscape. 1977 I believe. It was released just days before the plane crash..I picked up the alternate album cover several months later and preserved the original.

    Whiskey bottles and brand new cars....Oak tree you're in my way......

    Replies: @ben tillman

    “Play it pretty for Duane and Berry” — I can’t recall which bootleg that is from (I listen to the Perth, Cardiff, Winterland, and Knebsworth Park versions fairly often), but I will be going to Macon for the first time this fall.

    That album cover brings to mind Who Are You released by the Who less than a year later. The album cover featured Keith Moon sitting backward in a chair marked “not to be taken away”. Three weeks after the album’s release, Moon was dead.

  209. @jsm
    @Lagertha


    Similarly, I would be fine with every leftist Coastal woman to have an abortion way into their 40’s – Democrat-voting white women do not deserve to have sons. Democrat women do not deserve to have children.
     
    Aye.

    Heavenly Father, if Jesus need tarry a bit longer, could you please, in the meantime, send an epidemic of Asherman's syndrome? Thanks!

    Replies: @Lagertha

    weak men are weak men who never understood strong women.

  210. Just love our beautiful Melania – she wore my grandpa’s uniform better when she shamed the world about the fucking big buiz/bangsters about the price of medicines. Bankers have been the blocks about meds – fuck the banksters! When did Occupied Wall Street die? What happened to that worthy time? The banksters fear BLM/Occupy/Dumb ass white 30 yr olds/Antifa idiots. At some point, these youngish people will realize that they were used!.- such dumb asses!

    Wake up!…and for some of you, it only works to say: Wake the Fuck Up!

  211. @Anonymous
    The typical female brain is hardwired to comply with 'dominance'. Surely, most male iStevers can cast their minds back to kindergarten or grade school and remember, even at that tender age, the vast behavioral gulf between girls and boys, and just how much the innate feminine wish to please authority annoyed you.
    The dominant narrative is white racial inferiority, thus females comply with it.
    It appears that this genetically determined unconscious urge to comply with authority and dominance - which doubtless has been honed by millennia of evolutionary behavior - is stronger, in the female at least, than the familial link.

    Replies: @BB753, @The Germ Theory of Disease, @Libre, @Alden

    Another woman hating loser nerd wimp womanless childless clueless useless worthless Woody Allen look alike who’s never been able to dominate a woman, man or child in his loser life.

    I bet Ron never thought his site would be turned into group therapy for men with psycho sexual problems they’re eager to share with the world.

  212. @Art Deco
    @Alden

    I'm realistic about contemporary family relations. This tends to bother people who fancy they should be free from any sort of accountability, even impersonal criticism.

    Replies: @Alden

    So men shouldn’t be held accountable and responsible for the children they create? That’s why we’ve got all these black and Hispanic kids on welfare.

    Child supports not a life long burden you know. Like most childless womanless MEN OF UNZ you think children stay children forever and child support never ends.

  213. @Art Deco
    @Alden

    A person of that name lives outside of Columbus. Both her father and her step-father can be identified from various databases. The people are real enough. That's not the fabricated portion. If my own experience with the media (30 years past) is any guide, conscientiousness and integrity are inversely related to professional prestige.

    Replies: @Alden

    I believe you, but I don’t believe a word in the lying NYSLIMES. Many years of reading it’s lies influenced my opinion of the SLIMES

  214. @Abe
    @Steve Sailer


    Jordan has vices, like gambling, that are offshoots of his extreme competitiveness and desire to constantly win.
     
    I feel like the impertinent grasshopper correcting the master here, since you, Steve, were the one who originally WOKE me to the existence of the ‘Jordan rules’ or whatever they’re called- i.e. the effective information blackout on Jordan’s personal life by a lapdog sports media desperate to retain access above all else- cf. the almost total memory-holing of Jordan’s divorce ~10 years ago even as the fall-out from it (His Airness reduced to schlepping Hanes T-shirts and underwear on TV to get back some of the money lost after an adverse divorce settlement) was staring us in the face.

    The actual quote (from MJ himself) in LAST DANCE was about Jordan walking in on a preseason team coke party in Peoria (“Peoria coke party” being the saddest 3 words in the universe next to “Joyce Carol Oates”), seeing “lines” over here, weed over there, women over there (probably a mixture of skinny, lively black girls and hollow-eyed, chunky, bleached blonde white girls and every one of them with big hair- basically a backup dancing troupe for a Rick James music video) and him immediately skeedaddling it right out of there, it taking the last ounce of gumption in his 6’6” lanky frame not to run back to Carolina so he could be fishing with Oppie and Andy by Sunday.

    So, yes, thanks for the reality check- given Jordan’s extremely high level of performance over 15+ years, he probably was not doing coke. I find it extremely hard to believe he has not banging out wannabe Rick James girls in the same time period, and impossible to believe in his Vegas/post-NBA years he was not gambling, banging 100’s of skanks, doing God knows what drugs, and cruising the strip with Tom Hanks for homeless albinos to take home and and then have sit on his chest while they ripped out his toe nails.

    Meaning, LAST DANCE’s attempt to still sell Jordan’s wholesome, 90’s era SPACE JAM teddybear image is a bit ridiculous given all that has come out since, given all that you yourself, Steve, have done to educate us about the slimy MO of entertainment media, given all Trump has taught us all about the slimy MO of ALL MEDIA (“found Duranty until proven innocent”). Fare thee well, young man, and jock sniff no more.

    Replies: @Alden

    Blackball news. Kareem Al Jabar’s octoroon son age 28 , was just arrested for beating up and seriously injuring a 60 year old White neighbor who asked Jabar jr to bring in his garbage cans instead of leaving them on the driveway all week. Happened in San Clemente Ca. At least Orange county district attorney office hasn’t been turned into a Soros nest of Marxist snakes yet.

    Jabar jr wears a huge medium brown Afro and beard to disguise his White Caucasian European appearance

    • Replies: @The Last Real Calvinist
    @Alden

    Yes, and this story is actually being covered by NBC here: LINK

    Jabbar Jr didn't just beat up his neighbor; he stabbed him repeatedly and broke his skull.

    Here's a photo:

    https://media4.s-nbcnews.com/j/newscms/2020_35/3407436/200825-adam-abdul-jabbar-2017-ac-816p_a94155267303d515a1cf2d29b502d15e.fit-2000w.jpg

  215. @Justvisiting
    @Stogumber


    But what’s about flooding children with negative propaganda, instilling feelings of guilt and shame?
     
    My prediction:

    One of the kids will end up as a suicide statistic.

    Another one will rebel and become a white nationalist.

    The third will "go along to get along" and muddle through whatever faces them without ideology.

    Replies: @Rahan

    One of the kids will end up as a suicide statistic.

    But will he first be pumped with estrogen and castrated, before joining the 41%, or will it be a more generic “I can’t stand this shit without regular doses of fentanyl” thing?

  216. @Alden
    @Abe

    Blackball news. Kareem Al Jabar’s octoroon son age 28 , was just arrested for beating up and seriously injuring a 60 year old White neighbor who asked Jabar jr to bring in his garbage cans instead of leaving them on the driveway all week. Happened in San Clemente Ca. At least Orange county district attorney office hasn’t been turned into a Soros nest of Marxist snakes yet.

    Jabar jr wears a huge medium brown Afro and beard to disguise his White Caucasian European appearance

    Replies: @The Last Real Calvinist

    Yes, and this story is actually being covered by NBC here: LINK

    Jabbar Jr didn’t just beat up his neighbor; he stabbed him repeatedly and broke his skull.

    Here’s a photo:

  217. @Muggles
    @Roderick Spode

    >>I’m yawning over here. The Vichy government was the real French Resistance, facing off against the real occupying (((power))) for which the “French Resistance” were useful idiots.<<

    Normally I don't do ad hominem replies here. But this is sick.

    No one in France, other than a handful of jihadi "refugees," would agree with you.

    That Hitler worship disease you have is classic Stage 4 dementia.

    Likewise for your "fans" here.

    Replies: @Roderick Spode, @BB753

    Pétain was no Hitler. He wasn’t even a fascist, more like a Catholic reactionary like Francisco Franco. He just decided to safeguard whatever was left of France’s sovereignty but also chose the losing side of the war, unlike boot-licker de Gaulle who chose the winning side: the US and the USSR. Everybody else lost that war, including Great Britain.
    Let’s not forget that America had been supporting the bolsheviks since 1904, and that there wouldn’t have been a USRR without the financial and industrial support of the USA since 1917. After 1945, the US and the Soviet Union continued a long charade called the Cold War, which was mostly for show, as they divided the remains of Europe’s former colonies between themselves as spoils of war and also the prized metropolises, to become their puppet client states.
    In war, there are no good guys, not even your own guys.

    • Replies: @Muggles
    @BB753

    >>In war, there are no good guys, not even your own guys.<<

    Too cynical. There are bad nations (led by bad guys) and even worse. And some good. The attackers are usually the worst.

    The Vichy government was a failure since Germany eliminated it once things in France got serious for them. Petain was sentenced to death post war but De Gaulle informally commuted it and Petain died in exile on a small French island. He was a hero originally and once De Gaulle's commander and hero. If you enjoy collaborators so much, how do you like the American "Loyalists" during our revolution?

    De Gaulle was no "boot licker" as you say. You know nothing about it, obviously. FDR disliked him and Churchill hated him. He was simply pro free French. Read a bio for a change.

    America didn't support "Bolsheviks" (absurd notion) and didn't formally recognize the Communist government until the late 30s. Yes, some businessmen did but the USSR (not USRR) didn't survive due to that. It barely survived at all after their deal with Hitler went south. Nor was the Cold War a charade. No Russian believes it and few Americans do.

    You can dislike the American post war imperial mentality (alive today) without indulging in fantasy revisionism.

    Replies: @BB753

  218. @Ghost of Bull Moose
    @Ben tillman

    SJP and JVP exist only in countries where Jews are a minority. They have no influence whatsoever in Israel. They are ostensibly anti-Zionist, but their reason for being is the premise that Jews have undue influence in America.

    Which is true, of course. But you know, anti-Zionists have their big Satan and their little Satan, so I'm not sure there's much room for common cause with heritage Americans or gentiles even if they agree on that point.

    In any case, I'm not bothered with most 'J' talk around here because I'm first and foremost an American, and the way I see it, today they call Israel an apartheid state and tomorrow (the very day whites become a minority) they will call America an apartheid state. They do that already, ignoring the essential fact that whites in America and Jews in Israel are not minorities, therefore the comparison is not apt. I'm also half Scots-Irish descended from settlers, and they're plenty well represented among the perfidious One Worlders themselves.

    But demographics are all. Israel had a serious demographic threat years ago and then got an infusion of Soviets to hold it back for a few decades. America is facing a demographic threat, and the American Jews (and others) encouraging this population replacement are stupid and/or malignant, no doubt. As Steve says, they better wise up to the fact that these Third Worlders think of Jews as white but even more so ( even if some whites don't think J's are white at all.) Fuzzy Wuzzys do not differentiate.

    Replies: @ben tillman

    SJP and JVP exist only in countries where Jews are a minority.

    I never heard of them, and I — more importantly — never heard from them. They’re a complete non-factor. Jews NEVER apologize for Jewish privilege anywhere that matters.

  219. @BB753
    @Muggles

    Pétain was no Hitler. He wasn't even a fascist, more like a Catholic reactionary like Francisco Franco. He just decided to safeguard whatever was left of France's sovereignty but also chose the losing side of the war, unlike boot-licker de Gaulle who chose the winning side: the US and the USSR. Everybody else lost that war, including Great Britain.
    Let's not forget that America had been supporting the bolsheviks since 1904, and that there wouldn't have been a USRR without the financial and industrial support of the USA since 1917. After 1945, the US and the Soviet Union continued a long charade called the Cold War, which was mostly for show, as they divided the remains of Europe's former colonies between themselves as spoils of war and also the prized metropolises, to become their puppet client states.
    In war, there are no good guys, not even your own guys.

    Replies: @Muggles

    >>In war, there are no good guys, not even your own guys.<<

    Too cynical. There are bad nations (led by bad guys) and even worse. And some good. The attackers are usually the worst.

    The Vichy government was a failure since Germany eliminated it once things in France got serious for them. Petain was sentenced to death post war but De Gaulle informally commuted it and Petain died in exile on a small French island. He was a hero originally and once De Gaulle's commander and hero. If you enjoy collaborators so much, how do you like the American "Loyalists" during our revolution?

    De Gaulle was no "boot licker" as you say. You know nothing about it, obviously. FDR disliked him and Churchill hated him. He was simply pro free French. Read a bio for a change.

    America didn't support "Bolsheviks" (absurd notion) and didn't formally recognize the Communist government until the late 30s. Yes, some businessmen did but the USSR (not USRR) didn't survive due to that. It barely survived at all after their deal with Hitler went south. Nor was the Cold War a charade. No Russian believes it and few Americans do.

    You can dislike the American post war imperial mentality (alive today) without indulging in fantasy revisionism.

    • Replies: @BB753
    @Muggles

    For your interest, I've read de Gaulle's "Memoires de guerre" , which are as reliable as Julius Caesar's self-serving "De gallico bello". Indeed, de Gaulle was a fraud and puppet of America and Great Britain. No war hero like Pétain, he saw little if any action in either world war.
    De Gaulle spent his time in office dismantling France's Empire and opening wide the doors to African immigration into France.
    As for the Soviet Union, not only did American Banks, including Chase Manhattan, and financiers like Schiff bankroll the Soviet Revolution, also Wilson administration officials escorted Trotsky to Finland after releasing him from the Canadians who kept the revolutionary captive in Halifax. President Hoover sent food to the USSR during the Great Famine, which Lenin distributed only among the people on his side, letting 20 million people die of starvation, to the applause of Duranty and the British Fabians. I could go on and on, but you'll have to do your own research.

  220. Hardcore French nationalists profess to see no difference between the German/Italian invasions of 1940 and the Anglo-American invasions of 1944–except to note that it took much longer to get rid of the latter. (They consider that France only really regained its independence in 1966, when NATO forces left the country.)

  221. @Muggles
    @BB753

    >>In war, there are no good guys, not even your own guys.<<

    Too cynical. There are bad nations (led by bad guys) and even worse. And some good. The attackers are usually the worst.

    The Vichy government was a failure since Germany eliminated it once things in France got serious for them. Petain was sentenced to death post war but De Gaulle informally commuted it and Petain died in exile on a small French island. He was a hero originally and once De Gaulle's commander and hero. If you enjoy collaborators so much, how do you like the American "Loyalists" during our revolution?

    De Gaulle was no "boot licker" as you say. You know nothing about it, obviously. FDR disliked him and Churchill hated him. He was simply pro free French. Read a bio for a change.

    America didn't support "Bolsheviks" (absurd notion) and didn't formally recognize the Communist government until the late 30s. Yes, some businessmen did but the USSR (not USRR) didn't survive due to that. It barely survived at all after their deal with Hitler went south. Nor was the Cold War a charade. No Russian believes it and few Americans do.

    You can dislike the American post war imperial mentality (alive today) without indulging in fantasy revisionism.

    Replies: @BB753

    For your interest, I’ve read de Gaulle’s “Memoires de guerre” , which are as reliable as Julius Caesar’s self-serving “De gallico bello”. Indeed, de Gaulle was a fraud and puppet of America and Great Britain. No war hero like Pétain, he saw little if any action in either world war.
    De Gaulle spent his time in office dismantling France’s Empire and opening wide the doors to African immigration into France.
    As for the Soviet Union, not only did American Banks, including Chase Manhattan, and financiers like Schiff bankroll the Soviet Revolution, also Wilson administration officials escorted Trotsky to Finland after releasing him from the Canadians who kept the revolutionary captive in Halifax. President Hoover sent food to the USSR during the Great Famine, which Lenin distributed only among the people on his side, letting 20 million people die of starvation, to the applause of Duranty and the British Fabians. I could go on and on, but you’ll have to do your own research.

  222. @Wyatt
    @Rosie


    This is incoherent rambling. I asked you how you know that the women you see at BLM protests are not Jewish? You did not give me an answer, because you don’t know. The Jew defense either works, or it doesn’t. You don’t get to use it to defend men and then deny that it applies to women.
     
    It's not, actually. As I said, your contention was regarding billionaires. When I pointed out that large numbers of "white" billionaires are jews, you immediately went to asking how many BLM women were jews. That's irrelevant because both your contention and mine was on financing and support. You didn't address the problem of belligerent Jewish billionaires; you shifted the goalposts to try and point out something tangential. Beyond that, population is

    And whose fault is that? KMac seems to be still alive and breathing. Why couldn’t a billionaire weather the storm? Where are all the untouchable tenured academics?
     
    The jews? I don't know what you're asking. If there weren't Ashkenazi jews in America, the ADL, SPLC and AIPAC wouldn't exist. Jewish subversion is designed specifically to silence white resistance through public shame and financial disenfranchisement. Are you going to ask why whites couldn't resist subversives who could ruin their lives for even speaking out?

    Papa John got dismissed for saying a naughty word. Man is a billionaire. All he did was use Power Word: Nigger and they fired his ass. I imagine someone that says "White people have a right to their own nation" would be subject to criminal investigations, threats from our long nosed friends, disciplinary actions from executive boards and public boycotts condoned by the right. Also, we've seen discrediting, failure to renew contracts and slandering of professors. Richard Lynn is the most prominent one I know. He lost his title because of the woke era for even daring to posit that there are racial differences.

    This is patently false. White women have not believed themselves to be victims for a long time. We are as likely to oppose affirmative action as White men, less likely than women of other races to consider ourselves feminists, and nearly as likely as White men to attribute women’s lower professional achievement to our own own choices.

    I have posted evidence to support these claims repeatedly on this site.
     
    Cool. Link the post or the url. It's not hard and you want to challenge me on a lack of citations by failing to cite anything yourself. Your assertion is false.

    Here, as usual, you offer nothing but unjustifiably broad generalizations about women.
     
    And you failed to refute it. You're attempting to dismiss the point without actually showing that it's not true. Generalizations hold broad truth for a reason. The phenomenon I described is readily observable. There are at least half a dozen documented events and groups where women have wormed their way into a movement or organization and things went to shit. Hell, comic books has had a woman problem these last few years. Want to watch some videos with me as Richard Meyers shits on SJW women in comics ruining the industry that even Rob Liefeld couldn't?

    I certainly could, but never mind that.
     
    You could, but you won't. You would cite things, but you already cited them. It feels like I'm arguing with one of those blacks who think blacks invented everything. Lady, if a man was arguing the way you are, they would have been dog piled already.

    You are not entitled to dictate the standard for determining women’s participation in politics. I can’t tell you what “women” could bring. I can only tell you what a particular woman could bring in light of her own unique qualities.
     
    No, but I can demand you prove your assertions when you claim that mine are wrong. You've proven this before, but you don't want to show that you have. You're willing to commit the time to reply, but not willing to show why you're right despite bitching at me for not citing things.

    As for what you can tell me about a particular woman's unique qualities, do it. Come on, do it. Do something at least.

    Correction: White women are more likely to identify as “not feminist” than women of other races. This is unsurprising, of course, because many of us can see that organized feminism targets our own men, whom we know to be a great deal less chauvinistic than other men.
     
    Well done! Your sex finally wised up to the damage you dealt as good little soldiers of the neo-liberal agenda! I mean, you only realized that because it was directly impacting your sex negatively and young white women still buy into that drivel when their votes would be essential to changing policy now.

    Why exactly is this supposed to be a positive for women wanting into nascent right wing and nationalist movements? "Guys, I fucked up, but I'm better now! Can I join your club?"

    Replies: @Rosie

    Cool. Link the post or the url. It’s not hard and you want to challenge me on a lack of citations by failing to cite anything yourself. Your assertion is false.

    Since you couldn’t be bothered to do your own research, here:

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/national/feminism-project/poll/

    41% of women (and 52% of men) believe feminism unfairly blames men for women’s challenges.

    And here:

    https://www.vox.com/2016/5/25/11682950/fisher-supreme-court-white-women-affirmative-action

    And here: White women more likely than women of other groups to say “I don’t identify as a feminist.”

  223. @Corvinus
    @Reg Cæsar

    Not even remotely an apples to apples comparison.

    Replies: @fish

    You should probably just quit while you are behind.

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to All Steve Sailer Comments via RSS
PastClassics
The JFK Assassination and the 9/11 Attacks?
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in Vietnam.