The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 TeasersiSteve Blog
Google Memoryholes My Blog

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Google has memoryholed my blog as well. Try Googling:

Steve Sailer

In contrast, Bing still recognizes the existence of my blog.

Similarly, Google has disappeared

http://www.tuckercarlson.com/

https://www.foxnews.com/shows/tucker-carlson-tonight

It’s almost as if there’s an election coming up and Google is going for maximum election interference.

 
Hide 218 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. Maybe just a glitch. Searching for the left wing lawyers guns and money blog was also failing. But things appear to be back to normal.

    • Replies: @ben tillman
    @James B. Shearer


    Maybe just a glitch. Searching for the left wing lawyers guns and money blog was also failing. But things appear to be back to normal.
     
    They are not.
    , @Louis Renault
    @James B. Shearer

    This is a test of the Emergency BroadcastingBlacklisting System. This is just a test.....

    , @Aardvark
    @James B. Shearer

    I didn't try it but I'm sure that a search for "honest mainstream journalist" appears memoryholed, but that's because nobody could remember when there ever was one.

    , @anon
    @James B. Shearer

    OP: This happened to a lot of sites today, briefly. Lion of the Blogosphere complained. Socialist sites got whacked.

    The Libertarian International asked members in every country to check and reported that it was in most but not all the US only...but NOT in Congressional offices (I'm always amazed at the Libertarian's info from having people on ground all over the place). I relate this to the strange stuff with Twitter the other day.

    Just checked your name and "Google has memoryholed my blog..." UNZ comes out on top.

  2. Anonymous[425] • Disclaimer says:

    It’s almost as if there’s an election coming up and Google is going for maximum election interference.

    But Google is Jewish Power, and connies dare not displease Jewish Power. All these yrs, Trump did nothing. And National Review is all about ‘muh capitalist oligarch’.

    Connism before Jewish Power is like Danny Devito in CUCKOO’S NEST.

    Google done it but who controls Google? Palestinians? Oh, Alex Jones and Carlson will warn us that it is ‘Chinese-styl’ censorship’. Never mind it is Jewish-Substance Censchwarzship. Nothing is possible until the Power is named and shamed.

  3. “Ernest”? Yikes. Maybe they should memory hole you Steve. But I just checked and you’re still there. For the moment anyway..

    Now about that middle name I just discovered by googling you…

    • Replies: @Kylie
    @Stan d Mute

    "'Ernest'? Yikes."

    Could be worse. Like "Endeavour". That'd be worse.

    Or my great-grandfather's first name. Ezekiel. He went by "E. Mason Roberts" all his life.

    Replies: @Rob McX

    , @the one they call Desanex
    @Stan d Mute

    Steve Ernest Sailer = Never sees real tits

    , @MEH 0910
    @Stan d Mute

    That was Steve's late father's first name.

    https://www.unz.com/isteve/ernie-sailer-1917-2012/

    , @Mr Mox
    @Stan d Mute

    "The Importance of Being Ernest" ?

  4. Well, we can be sure that the Googlemeister did not memory-hole Steve upon the basis of his coronadoom.

    • Agree: Je Suis Omar Mateen
    • Replies: @Je Suis Omar Mateen
    @Liberty Mike

    "Well, we can be sure that the Googlemeister did not memory-hole Steve upon the basis of his coronadoom."

    I meant to hit disagree. ZHedge has orgasmically shilled for CoronaHoax the past five months and was attacked anyway by g00gle because commenters overwhelmingly called BS on the hoax. Oh yeah baby, g00gle reads our comments, QED.

    Replies: @Liberty Mike

    , @Redman
    @Liberty Mike

    But Steve has been notably silent on the Wuflu for some time now. And especially now that CA is one of the supposed centers of concern.

    I miss Hail, who always had some interesting data to share on how this wasn’t the plague.

    Replies: @Simon Tugmutton, @Jim Don Bob, @MEH 0910

  5. Nothing of the sort is happening when I google Steve Sailer. First occurrence: your twitter. Second: your Wikipedia page. Third occurrence: your blog.

    • Replies: @ben tillman
    @Brás Cubas

    That's not what he means. The blog entries are excluded from the search results.

    Replies: @bossel

    , @Adam Smith, @Jack D
    @Brás Cubas

    It was briefly broken and by the time you googled they had fixed it.

  6. Ah yes, the Mrs. Pritchet of the Internet is active again, dreaming her dream.

    Philip K. Dick would have loved this epoch.

    From “Eye in the Sky”.

    [MORE]

    In all possible universes, Monday was the same. At eight-thirty A.M., Hamilton was seated on the Southern Pacific commuters’ train, a San Francisco Chronicle spread out on his lap, on his way up the coast to the Electronics Development Agency. Assuming, of course, that it existed. As yet, he couldn’t tell.

    Around him, listless white-collar workers smoked and read the comics and discussed sports. Hunched over in his seat, Hamilton moodily considered them. Did they know they were distorted figments of somebody’s fantasy world? Apparently not. Placidly, they went about their Monday routine, unaware that every aspect of their existence was being manipulated by an invisible presence.

    • Replies: @JimB
    @El Dato

    If you regularly get news from the Trump campaign and if you delete a couple of posts without reading them, Google mail helpfully asks you if you want to block the Trump campaign website.

  7. I think they fixed it now. I suppose it was a trial balloon and they got backlash and backed off. They will probably keep trying until they feel confident enough to withstand any backlash. How will you know if the time is right if you don’t keep trying? In the meantime, it serves to keep conservatives off balance and maybe lead them to self-censor so it’s all good.

    • Agree: Kronos
    • Replies: @Barnard
    @Jack D

    Arthur Bloom of The American Conservative has previously written that Google can manually manipulate this to memory hole certain people or websites. It probably was a trial balloon, but it is odd they would include Rod Dreher. He is not a Trump supporter and is mostly promoting his upcoming book. Unless the book, which is comparing that tactics of our progressives to the Soviets and warning Christians to get ready for further persecution from the state is the reason they included him.

  8. I read it’s working again. Who knows.

  9. You sure? I just googled Steve Sailer. The first hit was wikipedia, then twitter, then wikiquote and then unz. Maybe just a glitch in the matrix. Or maybe DJT fixed it.

    To be serious, this censorship is bad and getting worse. How about a decade long anti trust investigation by the FTC, DOJ, and others? BJC did it to Microsoft in the 90s.

  10. “Google has memoryholed my blog as well. Try Googling: Steve Sailer”

    We did. It comes up on the first page.

    “Similarly, Google has disappeared…”

    No. Tucker’s sites also comes up on the first page.

    Trying to one up your boy Trump with the gaslighting quotient? You know, he was widely panned for his interview with Fox News and Chris Wallace on Sunday. Acing a cognitive test, downplaying Covid-19**, being coy about whether he would accept the election results if he lost.

    **Speaking of memory holing

    https://www.unz.com/isteve/arguably-wrong-ballparks-3-different-strageties

    https://www.unz.com/isteve/coronavirus-open-thread/

    • Troll: YetAnotherAnon
    • Replies: @res
    @Corvinus

    We? The only thing sadder than your comments would be if it took more than one person to write them.

    This memory holing glitch in the matrix is validating my idea to start recording what Google searches record at different times. The changes are interesting.

    Replies: @Alexander Turok, @AKAHorace, @Hypnotoad666

    , @Ben Kurtz
    @Corvinus

    The glitch seems to be resolved -- the blogs in question once again appear as the top results of the relevant Google searches -- but I noticed the drop-off when it happened earlier today, and observed at the time that other search engines did not suffer the same glitch at the same time.

    Make of it what you will, but I would be curious to know which blogs temporarily disappeared during this glitch and which did not. If there was some overt political pattern to it, I think that would suggest that somebody was test-driving some kind of censorship tool for use later. Rod Dreher's blog contains a list of a number of right wing blogs whose results all went dark at the same time, but I don't know if there is selection bias there. I also didn't perform enough tests at the time, personally, to come to any firm conclusions as to whether such a pattern was in evidence.

    If anyone here tried Google searching neutral or left-wing blogs and had interesting or unexpected results earlier today, it would be good to hear about them. (For that matter, if anyone can add to Steve and Rod's list of affected right-wing blogs, that would also be helpful.)

    , @Michael S
    @Corvinus


    You know, he was widely panned
     
    Interesting use of the passive voice. Panned by whom exactly?

    Oh, right. "Widely."
    , @Matthew Kelly
    @Corvinus

    Until Google open-sources their production-deployed algorithm and provides complete transparency to the general public as to how it ranks, blacklists, etc., various sites and searches, I err on the side of assuming the worst from a company whose employees' political contributions go something like 99% DNC, 0% GOP; whose execs literally cried over Trump's election, and promised not to let it happen again; and which has operated, for the past decade or two (at least), on the unstated principle that "it's easier to ask forgiveness than permission" with regards to privacy, political influence, antitrust legislation, and the like.

    Replies: @Clifford Brown

    , @SunBakedSuburb
    @Corvinus

    "We did."

    The royal "We"? Or "We" as in Team Corvinus; a collection of New Left ladies who have given up coitus for social activism?

    Replies: @Corvinus

    , @Anonymous
    @Corvinus

    How long until the Russian collusion investigation gets Trump kicked out now, you TDS-addled sack o' crap? Remember all your well-researched pronouncements on that topic, Corvy?

    You must be jonesing for some of the hard stuff. Go read some Seth Abramson or Max Boot to get another fix, you junky pervert.

    , @Every court has its jester
    @Corvinus

    And we're glad you offer regular entertainment on this blog.

    In other news, Trump's unfitness for office and every other flaw he has have been beaten to death by every major media outlet, so there's nothing more to add here. Noticing anything else is rare and that's what makes Sailer so useful.

    Stuff disappearing from Google search results could be caused by anything, from a glitch in the code to someone messing with the code in real time as a prank to a polemical group of Google employees deliberately testing the waters. There's no transparency when it comes to coding so we can never know. However, the fact that noone aligned with the political left has ever complained about being suppressed online should tell you something.

    , @MEH 0910
    @Corvinus


    Trying to one up your boy Trump with the gaslighting quotient?
     
    I saw with my own eyes that Unz Review itself didn't show up in a Google search yesterday.

    Replies: @Corvinus

    , @anon
    @Corvinus

    The Lincoln Project guys have whipped up a good campaign ad from the FOX interview:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gsaO3v4SvwA

    Replies: @Sam Malone, @anon, @anon

    , @VinnyVette
    @Corvinus

    You need a knew handle something like... Trolliusmaximus would be a good fit.

    Replies: @Corvinus

  11. Seems not to be memoryholed on my side of the pond.

  12. res says:

    I just looked at Google Trends for your name.
    https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?q=steve%20sailer&geo=US

    One odd thing is it is showing a spike to 2x the usual volume and a breakout related query: [email protected]

    Strange stuff. I wonder if it has something to do with the memory holing mechanism.

    In contrast, Ron just seems to have been disappeared. Current interest to 0 and no related queries, plus the only related topic is Wikipedia.
    https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?q=ron%20unz&geo=US

    P.S. I am amazed they memory holed Tucker. That seems too over the top to ignore.

    • Replies: @CrunchyButRealistCon
    @res

    Compared the search results for 'Steve Sailer' on duckduckgo, startpage & yahoo, and all three seem alright. Appears duckduckgo lists your blog description at unz.com as first result while the other two tend to favor wikipedia in rank.

  13. @Corvinus
    "Google has memoryholed my blog as well. Try Googling: Steve Sailer"

    We did. It comes up on the first page.

    "Similarly, Google has disappeared..."

    No. Tucker's sites also comes up on the first page.

    Trying to one up your boy Trump with the gaslighting quotient? You know, he was widely panned for his interview with Fox News and Chris Wallace on Sunday. Acing a cognitive test, downplaying Covid-19**, being coy about whether he would accept the election results if he lost.

    https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1285520211593105413

    **Speaking of memory holing

    https://www.unz.com/isteve/arguably-wrong-ballparks-3-different-strageties

    https://www.unz.com/isteve/coronavirus-open-thread/

    Replies: @res, @Ben Kurtz, @Michael S, @Matthew Kelly, @SunBakedSuburb, @Anonymous, @Every court has its jester, @MEH 0910, @anon, @VinnyVette

    We? The only thing sadder than your comments would be if it took more than one person to write them.

    This memory holing glitch in the matrix is validating my idea to start recording what Google searches record at different times. The changes are interesting.

    • Replies: @Alexander Turok
    @res

    Use of the royal we is a good indication of unwarranted self-importance.

    , @AKAHorace
    @res

    I googled Steve Sailer. The most interesting thing that I found was that nine years ago he wrote a film review for the Huffington Post. This could never happen now, an editor would be cancelled.

    Replies: @Steve Sailer

    , @Hypnotoad666
    @res


    This memory holing glitch in the matrix is validating my idea to start recording what Google searches record at different times. The changes are interesting.
     
    That is an excellent idea. It doesn't seem like it would be that hard to write some script that just constantly Googles terms and logs the results. In fact, you'd think someone would be doing this already for commercial purposes like tracking marketing trends or whatever.

    Replies: @Anon

  14. I can find all of those on my computer. However, about an hour ago many conservative and HBD sites that I can now find were missing. I would guess that someone at Google decided to do some censorship, but they are now reversing it. Google will surely blame on it on an innocuous glitch, but it may be a harbinger of things to come.

    • Agree: HammerJack
  15. You will love Big Brother, Steve.

  16. @Corvinus
    "Google has memoryholed my blog as well. Try Googling: Steve Sailer"

    We did. It comes up on the first page.

    "Similarly, Google has disappeared..."

    No. Tucker's sites also comes up on the first page.

    Trying to one up your boy Trump with the gaslighting quotient? You know, he was widely panned for his interview with Fox News and Chris Wallace on Sunday. Acing a cognitive test, downplaying Covid-19**, being coy about whether he would accept the election results if he lost.

    https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1285520211593105413

    **Speaking of memory holing

    https://www.unz.com/isteve/arguably-wrong-ballparks-3-different-strageties

    https://www.unz.com/isteve/coronavirus-open-thread/

    Replies: @res, @Ben Kurtz, @Michael S, @Matthew Kelly, @SunBakedSuburb, @Anonymous, @Every court has its jester, @MEH 0910, @anon, @VinnyVette

    The glitch seems to be resolved — the blogs in question once again appear as the top results of the relevant Google searches — but I noticed the drop-off when it happened earlier today, and observed at the time that other search engines did not suffer the same glitch at the same time.

    Make of it what you will, but I would be curious to know which blogs temporarily disappeared during this glitch and which did not. If there was some overt political pattern to it, I think that would suggest that somebody was test-driving some kind of censorship tool for use later. Rod Dreher’s blog contains a list of a number of right wing blogs whose results all went dark at the same time, but I don’t know if there is selection bias there. I also didn’t perform enough tests at the time, personally, to come to any firm conclusions as to whether such a pattern was in evidence.

    If anyone here tried Google searching neutral or left-wing blogs and had interesting or unexpected results earlier today, it would be good to hear about them. (For that matter, if anyone can add to Steve and Rod’s list of affected right-wing blogs, that would also be helpful.)

    • Agree: Sean
  17. I can verify that the memory holing occurred, but it has been “fixed” for the moment. Like a commenter above, I think this is just a trial run. If they get pushback, they undo it. Eventually, they won’t undo it.

  18. Destroy Google Now!

    I wrote this in August of 2017 about GOOGLE:

    Google billionaire Eric Schmidt went to Neo-Con headquarters at American Enterprise Institute in 2015 and pushed for more open borders mass immigration and amnesty for illegal alien invaders. Google billionaire Schmidt is an evil baby boomer who wants to racially transform the United States using mass immigration.

    Wojcicki is by no means alone among the Google plutocrats in her desire to destroy the United States using mass immigration. Almost all the plutocrats who control Google are fanatical open borders mass immigration supporters.

    President Trump must immediately begin the process by which Google can be broken up into bits. Google must either be destroyed or obliterated with little bits remaining. Google has given notice that they are a clear and present threat to the national security interests of the United States. Dismantle Google or destroy Google, or both, I don’t care how it is done, but Google must not be allowed to retain the political and financial power that they currently hold.

    Destroy Google Now!

    https://www.unz.com/isteve/when-will-vicious-nobodies-like-james-damore-stop-oppressing-billionaire-nepocrats/#comment-1963164

    Tweets from 2015, still fresh:

    • Replies: @kaganovitch
    @Charles Pewitt

    Welcome back Charles! I for one , have missed your 'on the one hand , on the other hand' analysis.

  19. WE NEED A TEDDY ROOSEVELT TO GO AFTER THESE BASTARDS.

    Search results and algorithms must be monitored and regulated like my corn flakes and steak are by the FDA. Actually, more so. They should be required to show their ingredients (source code) to the consumer so we can determine the bias. We demand full transparency.

    Back in 2016, pro-Trump hashtags trended regularly on Twitter. In the last two years, no pro-Trump hashtags trend. It at most takes a thousand people to make a hashtag trend on Twitter. You don’t think the President of the United States has a thousand dedicated supporters?

    Social media is The Matrix.

  20. @Corvinus
    "Google has memoryholed my blog as well. Try Googling: Steve Sailer"

    We did. It comes up on the first page.

    "Similarly, Google has disappeared..."

    No. Tucker's sites also comes up on the first page.

    Trying to one up your boy Trump with the gaslighting quotient? You know, he was widely panned for his interview with Fox News and Chris Wallace on Sunday. Acing a cognitive test, downplaying Covid-19**, being coy about whether he would accept the election results if he lost.

    https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1285520211593105413

    **Speaking of memory holing

    https://www.unz.com/isteve/arguably-wrong-ballparks-3-different-strageties

    https://www.unz.com/isteve/coronavirus-open-thread/

    Replies: @res, @Ben Kurtz, @Michael S, @Matthew Kelly, @SunBakedSuburb, @Anonymous, @Every court has its jester, @MEH 0910, @anon, @VinnyVette

    You know, he was widely panned

    Interesting use of the passive voice. Panned by whom exactly?

    Oh, right. “Widely.”

  21. @Corvinus
    "Google has memoryholed my blog as well. Try Googling: Steve Sailer"

    We did. It comes up on the first page.

    "Similarly, Google has disappeared..."

    No. Tucker's sites also comes up on the first page.

    Trying to one up your boy Trump with the gaslighting quotient? You know, he was widely panned for his interview with Fox News and Chris Wallace on Sunday. Acing a cognitive test, downplaying Covid-19**, being coy about whether he would accept the election results if he lost.

    https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1285520211593105413

    **Speaking of memory holing

    https://www.unz.com/isteve/arguably-wrong-ballparks-3-different-strageties

    https://www.unz.com/isteve/coronavirus-open-thread/

    Replies: @res, @Ben Kurtz, @Michael S, @Matthew Kelly, @SunBakedSuburb, @Anonymous, @Every court has its jester, @MEH 0910, @anon, @VinnyVette

    Until Google open-sources their production-deployed algorithm and provides complete transparency to the general public as to how it ranks, blacklists, etc., various sites and searches, I err on the side of assuming the worst from a company whose employees’ political contributions go something like 99% DNC, 0% GOP; whose execs literally cried over Trump’s election, and promised not to let it happen again; and which has operated, for the past decade or two (at least), on the unstated principle that “it’s easier to ask forgiveness than permission” with regards to privacy, political influence, antitrust legislation, and the like.

    • Replies: @Clifford Brown
    @Matthew Kelly

    Imagine dressing like this. Imagine being a Billionaire and dressing like this. We are ruled by the decadent and the weak.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FRf9UxsM-NE

    Replies: @njguy73, @Grumpy, @Kyle

  22. anon[205] • Disclaimer says:

    I Googled, you shameless beggar, and it’s obvious Google did not ‘memory-hole’ anything. First hit was WIKI and the second was unz, which is perfectly consistent with what one expects Google algorithms to produce.

    You have a remarkable sense of persecution for someone who tries to come off as neutral and level-headed and “the voice of reasonableness and truth.”

    • Agree: ScarletNumber
    • Troll: Cloudbuster, Lurker, Kronos
    • Replies: @ben tillman
    @anon


    I Googled, you shameless beggar, and it’s obvious Google did not ‘memory-hole’ anything. First hit was WIKI and the second was unz, which is perfectly consistent with what one expects Google algorithms to produce.

    You have a remarkable sense of persecution for someone who tries to come off as neutral and level-headed and “the voice of reasonableness and truth.”

     

    You're a moron. Thousands of blog entries written by Steve have in fact been memory-holed.

    And:

    MORE THAN THREE HOURS LATER, THE MEMORY-HOLING HAS NOT BEEN UNDONE.
  23. bing has been better for a long time now. like 5 years. not only for web search but for image search too. google VERY clearly politically compromised at this point. a process that began a while ago and got worse year by year. google’s main utility today is stuff like reverse image search, google maps, text translation, and other peripheral non-web search functions.

    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
    @prime noticer

    I agree. I start with duckduckgo, but if it fails me, I go to bing, and if it does I go to google (once in a few weeks or so). Bing indeed seems the best for image searches.

    BTW, a search for "peak stupidity" comes up with the right site every time, but it helps that I bang the livin' out of google on this (using google, just due to it being the most popular search engine for OTHERS.)

    You guys give it a shot. You'll see what I mean.

    Replies: @Mike Tre

  24. @res
    @Corvinus

    We? The only thing sadder than your comments would be if it took more than one person to write them.

    This memory holing glitch in the matrix is validating my idea to start recording what Google searches record at different times. The changes are interesting.

    Replies: @Alexander Turok, @AKAHorace, @Hypnotoad666

    Use of the royal we is a good indication of unwarranted self-importance.

  25. I just Googled “Steve Sailer” and there you were, in Wikipedia and also chez vous at unz.com.

    I suspect you shot a blank.

    • Agree: ScarletNumber
    • Disagree: ben tillman
  26. Anon[278] • Disclaimer says:

    Stop using Google, and stop using Chrome. I switched to FireFox with DuckDuckGo as my default search engine months ago and never looked back. I didn’t want Google to track my every move. Big brother is always watching.

    When I was on Chrome, whenever I came to this website, I would get a “Danger!” sign warning me that unz.com is not a “Secure” site, I guess what they meant was it’s not a “safe space” for the snowflakes. Since I switched to FireFox, I never see that again.

    Fuck Google. It’s just another media company, run by the same tribe as the one controlling old media. Always got to control the narrative. Whoever controls the narrative controls the country, and the world.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    @Anon


    I switched to FireFox with DuckDuckGo as my default search engine months ago and never looked back.
     
    I haven't trusted Firefox since they fired Brendan Eich many years ago.

    Replies: @Clyde

  27. Lot says:

    “Tucker Carlson” search on DuckDuckGo: first two results are his personal homepage and his fox page.

    “Rachel Maddow” on Google: First two results are her personal page and MSNBC page.

    “Tucker Carlson” on Google:

    Result 1 is biased wiki page
    2 is a “Vultue.com” accusation of “sexual misconduct”
    3 is CNN saying his “writer quits after secretly posting racist…”

    His Fox page doesn’t come until 7, and his personal homepage isn’t in the first 30 results at all.

    Bigger question for some of you: why haven’t you switched yet to Brave Browser and DuckDuckGo?

    • Agree: Redman
    • Replies: @Chrisnonymous
    @Lot

    What is the advantage of Brave over Vivaldi? (I'm not interested in getting involved in cryptocurrency.)

    Replies: @Lot

    , @PiltdownMan
    @Lot

    I've had DuckDuckGo as my default search engine for a couple of years, and it works well, except, occasionally, Google image search will yield better, more focused results when I'm looking for a suitable image to illustrate a point.


    https://i.imgur.com/s2SmLzZ.jpg

  28. @Corvinus
    "Google has memoryholed my blog as well. Try Googling: Steve Sailer"

    We did. It comes up on the first page.

    "Similarly, Google has disappeared..."

    No. Tucker's sites also comes up on the first page.

    Trying to one up your boy Trump with the gaslighting quotient? You know, he was widely panned for his interview with Fox News and Chris Wallace on Sunday. Acing a cognitive test, downplaying Covid-19**, being coy about whether he would accept the election results if he lost.

    https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1285520211593105413

    **Speaking of memory holing

    https://www.unz.com/isteve/arguably-wrong-ballparks-3-different-strageties

    https://www.unz.com/isteve/coronavirus-open-thread/

    Replies: @res, @Ben Kurtz, @Michael S, @Matthew Kelly, @SunBakedSuburb, @Anonymous, @Every court has its jester, @MEH 0910, @anon, @VinnyVette

    “We did.”

    The royal “We”? Or “We” as in Team Corvinus; a collection of New Left ladies who have given up coitus for social activism?

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    @SunBakedSuburb

    "The royal “We”?

    "We" as in people who NOTICE. Mr. Sailer is feigning outrage and being hypocritical in his own right about "memory holing", but I would not expect you to admit it. That is the major point here.

    Now, as far as free speech is concerned, recall the Supreme Court has ruled in several cases that if a private company/organization creates a public forum for speech, the fact that it is a private company/organization allows its immunity from the First and Fourteenth Amendments (Hudgens v. NLRB, Lloyd Corp. v. Tanner, and Central Hardware Co. v. NLRB). Perhaps the Big Bear's lawsuit can make it to the Supreme Court and serve as the impetus for change, considering how today's "cancel culture" is akin to the censorship of the 1950's. And maybe what is needed is a corporate personhood amendment that can reign in social media companies. Then again, the EU may actually set the standards for other nations to follow.

    https://www.irishtimes.com/news/world/europe/why-facebook-wants-the-eu-to-decide-the-limits-of-free-speech-1.4270126


    Different approaches taken by two of the biggest social media giants in recent days have highlighted the high stakes of managing problematic online content. As protests against the killing of black people by police swept the United States, president Donald Trump wrote on Twitter and Facebook “Any difficulty and we will assume control but, when the looting starts, the shooting starts”.
    In a first in its dealings with the US president, Twitter obscured the post with a warning label, saying it violated its rules against glorifying violence.

    But Facebook took a different approach, leaving the president’s post as it was. Chief executive Mark Zuckerberg said that while he found the post “deeply offensive”, it did not violate his company’s policies.

    Both companies have faced consequences.

    Twitter has been the focus of a backlash from Trump, who threatened to “strongly regulate” social media companies or “close them down”. For Facebook, the heat came from employees who openly criticised the company’s inaction. Two of them publicly quit.

    What kind of posts should not be allowed on social media, who should make those decisions, and how, is a regulatory puzzle. And Zuckerberg has asked the European Commission to solve it. In a public discussion with internal market commissioner Thierry Breton last month, the Facebook boss asked the commission to set rules for social media companies to follow. “Basically, the platforms shouldn’t be left to govern themselves,” Zuckerberg said. Europe had the opportunity to set a standard for the world, he argued, and should do so before China did."

    It might seem a strange position for Zuckerberg to take, but it makes sense.

    Such platforms are too big and too famous to host harmful speech without damage to their reputations. If there are to be rules, it’s easier for Facebook to follow one set of them for all of the EU rather than differing laws in each country. And it’s easier if the company does not have to do the expensive and difficult work of solving the riddle itself.

    But as your soy boy Alt Right leader Vox Day pronounced, focus on building your own platforms to avoid the machinations and "convergence" of Google, Twitter, and Facebook.
     

    Finally, per usual, "cancel culture" and "political correctness" needs context. Try to follow along.

    Dennis Miller and Bill Maher --> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ipwMa5uT5es

    https://jacobinmag.com/2020/07/cancel-culture-harpers-letter-free-speech


    Conservatives who historically tended to oppose free speech and held the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) as chief in its pantheon of villains have suddenly rebranded themselves as free expression’s greatest defenders. But while they were happy to defend alt-right provocateur Milo Yiannopoulos’s right to express xenophobic and misogynist comments, when he began talking about the messy complications of the age of consent among gay men, they threw him under the bus.

    Donald Trump has worked to clamp down on trade unions “salting” workplaces, that is, the century-old practice of getting a trade-union-friendly person hired at a workplace that is targeted for unionization. And perhaps most notoriously, the same man who at Mount Rushmore denounced a “far-left fascist [sic] cultural revolution,” calling for “free and open debate” instead, only weeks before used the National Guard to teargas and clear nonviolent protesters from the streets of Washington for the sake of a cheap photo-op.

    One might expect the liberal-left to be among the strongest defenders of free speech at work, and of the right of workers to say what they wish, but too many have enthusiastically called upon employers to fire workers for alleged reactionary speech outside of the workplace, in effect cheering on at-will termination of employment, and embraced the multibillion-dollar human resources department–organized and employer-supervised “sensitivity training” industry, imposing top-down workshops, where workers are petrified they might say the wrong thing.

     

    https://www.harpersbazaar.com/uk/culture/a33296561/cancel-culture-a-force-for-good-or-a-threat-to-free-speech

    The idea of pushing someone out - because they have said or done something perceived to be offensive - leaves no room for growth or learning. Matt Haig describes cancel culture as “anti-progress because it is anti-change”. “Cancelling people pushes them away and makes them more likely to find spaces where bad views are the norm,” he says. “Obviously, if someone has been convicted of, say, violence or sexual assault then they need to be punished, but cancel culture isn’t that. Cancel culture, as I see it, involves the shutting down of different perspectives and treating people like mere disposable artefacts in the cultural economy.”

    ...

    The problem with cancel culture is that it has become too broad, and near meaningless. R Kelly was cancelled over decades of sexual-assault allegations, yet so too was Jodie Comer for dating a Republican. There is no proportion. It is used in so many different contexts, both heavy and light, that it oversimplifies, and loses its weight because it allows those who have engaged in dangerous and/or harmful rhetoric and behaviour to ride on the backlash.

    ...

    In the eyes of cancel culture, people are reduced to good or bad with no room for anything in-between. “The process is like air-brushing someone or something out,” says Beresford, “It doesn’t allow for the possibility that two sides could ever agree, or learn from each other, or could persuade each other of their arguments – or even agree to disagree.”
     

    THE BATTLE AGAINST ‘HATE SPEECH’ ON COLLEGE CAMPUSES GIVES RISE TO A GENERATION THAT HATES SPEECH--NINA BURLEIGH, NEWSWEEK, 5/26/16

    Until it was squashed by administrative decree, Williams College sophomore Zachary Wood headed up an on-campus lecture series called Uncomfortable Learning. Wood, an African-American who grew up in one of the poorer neighborhoods in Washington, D.C., is a self-described liberal, devoted to learning and books. He liked inviting controversial speakers, usually from the political right, to challenge young progressives cloistered in a collegiate utopia at one of the nationʻs great small liberal arts institutions. Last year, though, Wood encountered the limits of free speech at Williams. First, he invited Suzanne Venker, an anti-feminist author and lecturer. After a campus and social media outcry, Woodʻs fellow Uncomfortable Learning leaders disinvited her and then, to avoid further shaming on social media, resigned from the organization.

    Wood then formed a club of one and invited an even more confrontational speaker, British-American writer John Derbyshire. After suggesting that blacks are more antisocial than whites, he wrote that a small percentage is ferociously hostile to whites and will go to great lengths to inconvenience or harm us, while around half will go along [with violence] passively if the five percent take leadership in some event. An hour after Wood advertised Derbyshireʻs speech with a Facebook post, he was swarmed. On Facebook, someone wrote that Wood deserved the oil and whip, a reference to a punishment for slaves. Others accused him of providing a space on campus for hate speech,and began debating how to file a complaint against him. When Wood replied to one critic, “So you would never bring a speaker on the far right, like Venker and Derbyshire? I value the work I do with UL“, someone retorted,“Iʼd rather sell crack first.“

    A few days passed, the outrage kept building, and the university president disinvited Derbyshire. Wood believes students need to hear provocateurs like Derbyshire in order to formulate their own thoughts and challenges. “What is hate speech to begin with,” he asks. “Itʼs what people don t like to hear. Trump has the support of a considerable portion of the American electorate. With someone like him running for president, speaking on national television every day, saying controversial things about the most important issues of our time, it is imperative that we confront offensive views and afford college students the opportunity to learn how to engage constructively with people they vehemently disagree with. Shielding students from microaggressions does not improve their ability to argue effectively; it coddles them. At a time like this, uncomfortable learning is vital.“
     

    Replies: @SunBakedSuburb, @Anonymous, @Rob

  29. I noticed something similar about an hour ago trying to find Steve’s blog. Google isteve or isteve unz and nothing comes up. same for unz review. It worked at unz.com. This time it was easier to find it.

    Yes, they are indeed coming for us.

    • Replies: @Known Fact
    @Prof. Woland

    Unz Review comes up fine for me. I do worry that one day it won't, at all, but even doing Google or YouTube searches for totally non-political shows, albums or people can yield oddly inconsistent or incomplete results

    If I were Ron of Steve I'd have Plan B ready for when the hammer really does come down.

    , @Chrisnonymous
    @Prof. Woland

    Impossible. What about the Lord Voldemort Effect Shield?

  30. @Jack D
    I think they fixed it now. I suppose it was a trial balloon and they got backlash and backed off. They will probably keep trying until they feel confident enough to withstand any backlash. How will you know if the time is right if you don't keep trying? In the meantime, it serves to keep conservatives off balance and maybe lead them to self-censor so it's all good.

    Replies: @Barnard

    Arthur Bloom of The American Conservative has previously written that Google can manually manipulate this to memory hole certain people or websites. It probably was a trial balloon, but it is odd they would include Rod Dreher. He is not a Trump supporter and is mostly promoting his upcoming book. Unless the book, which is comparing that tactics of our progressives to the Soviets and warning Christians to get ready for further persecution from the state is the reason they included him.

  31. 1.4 x 10^6 results on google.com . I’m in Canada so maybe it’s different

  32. Duck Duck Go is a decent alternative that is less intrusive to your privacy.

    Lately I’ve been using Qwant, based in France. It’s pretty good.

    I think Yandex in Russia also offers a search engine.

    • Replies: @Jack D
    @The Wild Geese Howard


    Yandex in Russia also offers a search engine.
     
    Who could have imagined 50 years ago that if you wanted politically unbiased information you could no longer trust American sources and would have to get it from Russia.

    If you search for Steve Sailer on Yandex, this site comes up as the #2 link after his Twitter. On google, unz is at the moment #5.

    I have been using the Yandex Android browser on my tablet because (unlike Chrome for Android) it will run Chrome desktop extensions. (Don't ask me why Google won't allow extensions to run under Chrome for Android since it is technically feasible). Specifically I wanted to run the "Bypass Paywalls" extension which allows you to view most soft paywalled newspaper sites without a subscription (WSJ, Washington Post, etc.) .

    Replies: @J.Ross, @Johann Ricke, @The Wild Geese Howard, @Clyde

  33. Dear iSteve, kindly inform Google that my response to their misbehaviour is to post a cheque to you.

    (I take it that you can cash a cheque in pounds sterling without paying too much in charges?)

  34. One other thing, it looks like Trump is getting ready to drop the bomb. Part of the whole Q signaling about the storm is that there would be radio silence and a shut down of communications by the black hats once the SHTF.

    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/07/breaking-us-attorney-john-durham-negotiations-people-guilty-pleas-russia-collusion-scandal/

    Trump is going for the throat with the Durham investigation and if he can get the lower level schlubs to plead guilty and turn on their former superiors, that will simultaneously cut the legs out from under the left while checkmating the next level of operatives. Expect more of this.

    • Replies: @BenKenobi
    @Prof. Woland

    Forgive me for green-texting on Unz, but:

    >plan trusting in 2020

    Of course if the TrumpStaffel were to be formed tomorrow I'd enlist immediately. I want to believe.

    , @Neoconned
    @Prof. Woland

    I dunno who the radio host was but i randomly was listening the other day & they said indictments were coming in August.

  35. (with apologies to Ricardo Montalban)

    The Five Stages of a Bloggers’ Life

    1. Who is Steve Sailer? He has a blog?
    2. I read Steve Sailer’s ideas presented by a more famous journalist
    3. I read Steve Sailer
    4. I read Steve Sailer for his presentation of a less-famous bloggers’ ideas
    5. Who is Steve Sailer? He has a blog?

    • Replies: @Dieter Kief
    @Ray P


    4. I read Steve Sailer for his presentation of a less-famous bloggers’ ideas
    5. Who is Steve Sailer? He has a blog?
     
    6. Who's this Ray P. man - somebody told me the other day, that he ain't real, and that you could look right through him.

    Hu?

    Hehe!

    Replies: @Ray P

  36. Your blog entries now show up in the fourth spot. I note that Google manages to get the words “white supremacy” associated with your name twice on the page, even though they specifically refer to Vdare.

  37. Reading the latest copy of the New Yorker magazine, published exactly a week ago, I came across this sentence in a piece by Jill Lepore:

    One study suggests that two-thirds of Americans between the ages of fifteen and thirty-four who were treated in emergency rooms suffered from injuries inflicted by police and security guards, about as many people as the number of pedestrians injured by motor vehicles.
    – JILL LEPORE, NEW YORKER

    This sentence jumped out to me. How could it possibly be true that ‘two-thirds’ of all Americans aged 15-34 visiting emergency rooms had been injured by police or security guards, given the very many other reasons why people might present for emergency treatment? In the online version, there is no hyperlink to the research (although the article does contain hyperlinks), and the study’s authors are not named.

    Jill Lepore could hardly be more eminent. She is a professor of American history at Harvard, the recipient of a long list of awards, and a longstanding staff writer at the New Yorker, as well as a contributor at many other well regarded publications.

    I sought out the study she was referring to, and found it: a 2016 paper, whose lead author, Justin Feldman, was a doctoral student at Harvard at the time. Soon after publication, the findings were described in a Harvard press release, and also reported on by The Guardian.

    And it turns out I was right — the ‘two-thirds’ claim is not true. Not even close.

    I did my best to work out a rough estimate of the true proportion of 15-34 year olds visiting the ER who had suffered legal intervention injuries, and arrived at a figure of 0.2% (you can follow my working in this thread). So I believe Lepore’s claim to be off by a factor of several hundred.

    Why does this one sentence matter? Well, firstly, it misinforms readers, several of whom (based on my Twitter search for the article’s URL) also alighted on this claim, but unlike me took it on trust. Secondly, and perhaps more importantly, it tells us something about the political climate in a publication like the New Yorker, which was once famous for its rigorous fact checking.

    We know that political bias warps cognition, sometimes catastrophically, and this is, I think, an example of that in action. Lepore read Feldman’s research and she misunderstood part of it, despite being an exceptionally intelligent person. Like many other Left-leaning Democrats, she is convinced that police brutality is a huge, under-acknowledged problem in the United States, and she therefore jumped to the conclusion that this wildly inflated ‘two-thirds’ figure was plausible.

    The staff at the New Yorker who read her piece also, we must assume, considered it to be plausible. The sentence was printed and, as of the time of writing, has not been corrected. There has been no uproar on social media. I reached out to both the New Yorker and Feldman for comment, and have not received replies.

    https://unherd.com/thepost/an-untrue-claim-in-the-new-yorker-speaks-volumes/

    • Replies: @peterike
    @syonredux


    Jill Lepore could hardly be more eminent.
     
    Jill Lepore is a useless hack. All the regulars at The New Yorker are useless hacks, genuinely terrible people. The magazine would still publish good reporting now and again (from others), but I cancelled a couple of years ago after the fiftieth anti-Trump cover.

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar

    , @njguy73
    @syonredux


    So I believe Lepore’s claim to be off by a factor of several hundred.

     

    Could anyone who works in project management survive if their project cost estimates were that inaccurate?

    It reminds me of one of my favorite Jon Stewart lines. He did an interview about why he satirizes the media, and he said of certain pundits "How do these people survive after writing books like Dow 36,000? Would a weatherman keep his job if he said that tomorrow it's going to be 400 degrees and it'll snow mice?"
    , @ben tillman
    @syonredux


    One study suggests that two-thirds of Americans between the ages of fifteen and thirty-four who were treated in emergency rooms suffered from injuries inflicted by police and security guards, about as many people as the number of pedestrians injured by motor vehicles.
    – JILL LEPORE, NEW YORKER
     
    That's almost as stupid as the TV morons who thought the 500 millon dollars Bloomberg spent on his candidacy would suffice to pay 330 million Americans a million dollars each.

    How could someone be so utterly detached from the real world?
    , @Kylie
    @syonredux

    "Jill Lepore could hardly be more eminent. She is a professor of American history at Harvard, the recipient of a long list of awards...."

    Like that other eminent product of Harvard, historian and plagiarist, Doris Kearns Goodwin. Am I suggesting Lepore is also a plagiarist? No. But I am suggesting both use others' material without the rigorous intellectual honesty one should be able to expect from eminent, Harvard-educated historians.

    , @Hippopotamusdrome
    @syonredux



    who were treated in emergency rooms suffered from injuries inflicted by police and security guards

     

    Quibbling over numbers is the wrong question to ask.

    The proper question is so, how many inflicted injuries were the result of 100.00% lawful, legal actions that any non-political jury would instantly acquit?

    If there is a remainer, where the law was technically broken, how many are more deserving of the Darwin award than our sympathy?

    Police inflicted injuries will go down when people stop commiting crimes and resisting arrest.
  38. OT (startpage isn’t bad either btw)

    “Teen stabbed at knife awareness course”

    A young offender stabbed another teenager to death at a community centre while on a knife awareness course, a court has heard.

    The 17-year-old boy, who cannot be named, knifed Hakim Sillah, 18, twice in the chest at the west London centre on 7 November last year, Isleworth Crown Court was told.

    Prosecutors said there was “a cruel irony” that Mr Sillah was stabbed while attending a weapons awareness course.

    That’s one way of putting it.

    Michelle Nelson QC, prosecuting, said all participants at Hillingdon Civic Centre had been risk assessed before the session, which was run by the Youth Offending Teams (YOTS), and “those classified as high risk were precluded from attending“.

    Both the young men must have been risk assessed, but the sad reality is that both attended that course carrying knives,” she said.

    • Replies: @Rob McX
    @YetAnotherAnon

    I'd bet these "knife awareness courses" are compulsory as an alternative to prison for potentially homicidal "young offenders" who've been convicted of some knife-related crime. I suppose the authorities were foolish enough not to have a metal detector at each entrance.

    Replies: @Coemgen

  39. Steve, you memoryholed a big part of your own blog. Remember coronavirus? I do.

    • Agree: Corvinus
  40. @Stan d Mute
    “Ernest”? Yikes. Maybe they should memory hole you Steve. But I just checked and you’re still there. For the moment anyway..

    Now about that middle name I just discovered by googling you...

    Replies: @Kylie, @the one they call Desanex, @MEH 0910, @Mr Mox

    “‘Ernest’? Yikes.”

    Could be worse. Like “Endeavour”. That’d be worse.

    Or my great-grandfather’s first name. Ezekiel. He went by “E. Mason Roberts” all his life.

    • Replies: @Rob McX
    @Kylie


    Or my great-grandfather’s first name. Ezekiel. He went by “E. Mason Roberts” all his life.
     
    He wasn't related to Oral Roberts, by any chance? That's about the worst choice of name I've ever come across. It's just not right for a preacher. He named his son Oral too.

    Replies: @Kylie

  41. @prime noticer
    bing has been better for a long time now. like 5 years. not only for web search but for image search too. google VERY clearly politically compromised at this point. a process that began a while ago and got worse year by year. google's main utility today is stuff like reverse image search, google maps, text translation, and other peripheral non-web search functions.

    Replies: @Achmed E. Newman

    I agree. I start with duckduckgo, but if it fails me, I go to bing, and if it does I go to google (once in a few weeks or so). Bing indeed seems the best for image searches.

    BTW, a search for “peak stupidity” comes up with the right site every time, but it helps that I bang the livin’ out of google on this (using google, just due to it being the most popular search engine for OTHERS.)

    You guys give it a shot. You’ll see what I mean.

    • Replies: @Mike Tre
    @Achmed E. Newman

    Bing had a message about standing with BLM on their home page for like 2 weeks. No more.

  42. I just googled you by name and got plenty of stuff, with your blog posts and twitter posts, right under your wiki entry == I even misspelled your name as usual and it thoughtfully corrected me

  43. @Matthew Kelly
    @Corvinus

    Until Google open-sources their production-deployed algorithm and provides complete transparency to the general public as to how it ranks, blacklists, etc., various sites and searches, I err on the side of assuming the worst from a company whose employees' political contributions go something like 99% DNC, 0% GOP; whose execs literally cried over Trump's election, and promised not to let it happen again; and which has operated, for the past decade or two (at least), on the unstated principle that "it's easier to ask forgiveness than permission" with regards to privacy, political influence, antitrust legislation, and the like.

    Replies: @Clifford Brown

    Imagine dressing like this. Imagine being a Billionaire and dressing like this. We are ruled by the decadent and the weak.

    • Agree: ben tillman
    • Replies: @njguy73
    @Clifford Brown

    That's not decadence, that's strategy. It's the billionaire telegraphing "I'm just a regular guy" so the stupid masses will trust him while he buys up their dumb asses.

    Replies: @Change that Matters, @Clifford Brown, @Reg Cæsar

    , @Grumpy
    @Clifford Brown

    Decadent is the word. It looks like they go to work in the same clothes they sleep in.

    Silicon Valley is bizarre. You need millions to live on a drab street in San Jose in a house that a plumber once owned, and the plumber dressed better than the millionaire who bought his house.

    , @Kyle
    @Clifford Brown

    And their hair cuts. My god.

  44. @syonredux

    Reading the latest copy of the New Yorker magazine, published exactly a week ago, I came across this sentence in a piece by Jill Lepore:

     


    One study suggests that two-thirds of Americans between the ages of fifteen and thirty-four who were treated in emergency rooms suffered from injuries inflicted by police and security guards, about as many people as the number of pedestrians injured by motor vehicles.
    - JILL LEPORE, NEW YORKER
     

    This sentence jumped out to me. How could it possibly be true that ‘two-thirds’ of all Americans aged 15-34 visiting emergency rooms had been injured by police or security guards, given the very many other reasons why people might present for emergency treatment? In the online version, there is no hyperlink to the research (although the article does contain hyperlinks), and the study’s authors are not named.
     

    Jill Lepore could hardly be more eminent. She is a professor of American history at Harvard, the recipient of a long list of awards, and a longstanding staff writer at the New Yorker, as well as a contributor at many other well regarded publications.

     


    I sought out the study she was referring to, and found it: a 2016 paper, whose lead author, Justin Feldman, was a doctoral student at Harvard at the time. Soon after publication, the findings were described in a Harvard press release, and also reported on by The Guardian.
     

    And it turns out I was right — the ‘two-thirds’ claim is not true. Not even close.

     


    I did my best to work out a rough estimate of the true proportion of 15-34 year olds visiting the ER who had suffered legal intervention injuries, and arrived at a figure of 0.2% (you can follow my working in this thread). So I believe Lepore’s claim to be off by a factor of several hundred.

     


    Why does this one sentence matter? Well, firstly, it misinforms readers, several of whom (based on my Twitter search for the article’s URL) also alighted on this claim, but unlike me took it on trust. Secondly, and perhaps more importantly, it tells us something about the political climate in a publication like the New Yorker, which was once famous for its rigorous fact checking.
     

    We know that political bias warps cognition, sometimes catastrophically, and this is, I think, an example of that in action. Lepore read Feldman’s research and she misunderstood part of it, despite being an exceptionally intelligent person. Like many other Left-leaning Democrats, she is convinced that police brutality is a huge, under-acknowledged problem in the United States, and she therefore jumped to the conclusion that this wildly inflated ‘two-thirds’ figure was plausible.
     

    The staff at the New Yorker who read her piece also, we must assume, considered it to be plausible. The sentence was printed and, as of the time of writing, has not been corrected. There has been no uproar on social media. I reached out to both the New Yorker and Feldman for comment, and have not received replies.

     

    https://unherd.com/thepost/an-untrue-claim-in-the-new-yorker-speaks-volumes/

    Replies: @peterike, @njguy73, @ben tillman, @Kylie, @Hippopotamusdrome

    Jill Lepore could hardly be more eminent.

    Jill Lepore is a useless hack. All the regulars at The New Yorker are useless hacks, genuinely terrible people. The magazine would still publish good reporting now and again (from others), but I cancelled a couple of years ago after the fiftieth anti-Trump cover.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    @peterike


    Jill Lepore is a useless hack.
     
    I like her description of the prosecution of Indian captive Joshua Tefft after King Philip's War: He was either a traitor, or a coward. Either way, he was no Englishman.
  45. On google the first result for “steve sailer” is wikipedia.
    #2 is your twitter.
    #3 is another twitter link.
    #4 is wikiquote.
    #5 is unz.com/isteve.

  46. Currently Gulag searches for either “isteve immigration” or “steve sailer immigration” still do not yield results pointing to unz.com/iSteve. So if you search for Steve by name you get unz/iSteve, but if you add the keyword immigration that diverts away from unz.

  47. @Prof. Woland
    I noticed something similar about an hour ago trying to find Steve's blog. Google isteve or isteve unz and nothing comes up. same for unz review. It worked at unz.com. This time it was easier to find it.

    Yes, they are indeed coming for us.

    Replies: @Known Fact, @Chrisnonymous

    Unz Review comes up fine for me. I do worry that one day it won’t, at all, but even doing Google or YouTube searches for totally non-political shows, albums or people can yield oddly inconsistent or incomplete results

    If I were Ron of Steve I’d have Plan B ready for when the hammer really does come down.

  48. Is this ploy by Steve to increase searches for his name?

    I googled ‘Steve Sailer’ and your sites were the 3 top hits.

    • Replies: @Hippopotamusdrome
    @L. Cochner

    steve s

    Autocompletes and the 4th portrait is Steve. See why they need to start thinking about some cancelling now?

  49. @Stan d Mute
    “Ernest”? Yikes. Maybe they should memory hole you Steve. But I just checked and you’re still there. For the moment anyway..

    Now about that middle name I just discovered by googling you...

    Replies: @Kylie, @the one they call Desanex, @MEH 0910, @Mr Mox

    Steve Ernest Sailer = Never sees real tits

  50. If it is any consolation, DuckDuckGo still displays you … in fact, it puts these very pages at the top, though it links at the bottom to a very unflattering Wiki entry.

  51. If you google “vdare,” the first two hits are SPLC “extremist file” pages. First for the site itself, the next for Peter Brimelow.

  52. @Clifford Brown
    @Matthew Kelly

    Imagine dressing like this. Imagine being a Billionaire and dressing like this. We are ruled by the decadent and the weak.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FRf9UxsM-NE

    Replies: @njguy73, @Grumpy, @Kyle

    That’s not decadence, that’s strategy. It’s the billionaire telegraphing “I’m just a regular guy” so the stupid masses will trust him while he buys up their dumb asses.

    • Agree: Change that Matters
    • Replies: @Change that Matters
    @njguy73

    More thought has gone into those two outfits than for the average starlet's red carpet ensemble.

    For instance:

    1. Larry Page is wearing a "Google Yellow" T-shirt; Sergey Brin's is "Google Blue".

    2. Page has a "Google Yellow" microphone windsock; Brin's is "Google Blue".

    3. Page stands to our left, Brin to our right (i.e., in the correct color order for the Google logo - the second o is yellow, the second g is blue). Together they spell OG. Make of that what you will.

    There's no decadence on show here; just the same subliminal messaging you'll find at any corporate event.

    Replies: @Clifford Brown

    , @Clifford Brown
    @njguy73

    Regular guys dress like that? Like Sergey in that clip?

    Sundar Pichai in his black hoodie is dressed like a normal guy. Who is going for a jog or picking up doughnuts on a Saturday. This is not the way a CEO should dress. I have no doubt that Sundar thinks this is all weird and he just does it to fit in. Sundar is the only normal person at the top of Google.

    Sergey fried his brain.

    , @Reg Cæsar
    @njguy73


    That’s not decadence, that’s strategy. It’s the billionaire telegraphing “I’m just a regular guy” so the stupid masses will trust him while he buys up their dumb asses.
     
    Guy Kawasaki said his Hawaiian politician father taught him always to dress better than one's customers or clients or, in Hiram's case, voters. It's a matter of showing respect.

    Very good advice, but Guy, who spends a lot of time around SV VCs and is somewhat of one himself now, has since learned to water this down. Evidently if you wear a tie in San Mateo County you're a snob or something.
  53. I had to use Bing yesterday to locate this site.

    • Troll: ScarletNumber
    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
    @Art Deco

    See, now I don't get that. You and another commenter (maybe on the another post from today) bring up using a search engine to get to this site. You and the other commenter both are on here a lot. Why would you need the search engine rather than simply typing in 7 characters, and probably only one or two if you've used the browser on that device before recently (text completion)?

    How hard is it to type in unz.com? I ask you this, Art, because I do see loads of people do this to get to websites they go to all the time. I know these simple URLs, unz, vdare, peakstupidity, zerohedge, instapundit, etc, by heart, like I know the phone numbers of people, family or friends, who've had the same mobile or land lines for a long time.

    Replies: @ScarletNumber

  54. @Ray P
    (with apologies to Ricardo Montalban)

    The Five Stages of a Bloggers' Life

    1. Who is Steve Sailer? He has a blog?
    2. I read Steve Sailer's ideas presented by a more famous journalist
    3. I read Steve Sailer
    4. I read Steve Sailer for his presentation of a less-famous bloggers' ideas
    5. Who is Steve Sailer? He has a blog?

    Replies: @Dieter Kief

    4. I read Steve Sailer for his presentation of a less-famous bloggers’ ideas
    5. Who is Steve Sailer? He has a blog?

    6. Who’s this Ray P. man – somebody told me the other day, that he ain’t real, and that you could look right through him.

    Hu?

    Hehe!

    • Replies: @Ray P
    @Dieter Kief

    I am a figment of the imagination.

  55. @syonredux

    Reading the latest copy of the New Yorker magazine, published exactly a week ago, I came across this sentence in a piece by Jill Lepore:

     


    One study suggests that two-thirds of Americans between the ages of fifteen and thirty-four who were treated in emergency rooms suffered from injuries inflicted by police and security guards, about as many people as the number of pedestrians injured by motor vehicles.
    - JILL LEPORE, NEW YORKER
     

    This sentence jumped out to me. How could it possibly be true that ‘two-thirds’ of all Americans aged 15-34 visiting emergency rooms had been injured by police or security guards, given the very many other reasons why people might present for emergency treatment? In the online version, there is no hyperlink to the research (although the article does contain hyperlinks), and the study’s authors are not named.
     

    Jill Lepore could hardly be more eminent. She is a professor of American history at Harvard, the recipient of a long list of awards, and a longstanding staff writer at the New Yorker, as well as a contributor at many other well regarded publications.

     


    I sought out the study she was referring to, and found it: a 2016 paper, whose lead author, Justin Feldman, was a doctoral student at Harvard at the time. Soon after publication, the findings were described in a Harvard press release, and also reported on by The Guardian.
     

    And it turns out I was right — the ‘two-thirds’ claim is not true. Not even close.

     


    I did my best to work out a rough estimate of the true proportion of 15-34 year olds visiting the ER who had suffered legal intervention injuries, and arrived at a figure of 0.2% (you can follow my working in this thread). So I believe Lepore’s claim to be off by a factor of several hundred.

     


    Why does this one sentence matter? Well, firstly, it misinforms readers, several of whom (based on my Twitter search for the article’s URL) also alighted on this claim, but unlike me took it on trust. Secondly, and perhaps more importantly, it tells us something about the political climate in a publication like the New Yorker, which was once famous for its rigorous fact checking.
     

    We know that political bias warps cognition, sometimes catastrophically, and this is, I think, an example of that in action. Lepore read Feldman’s research and she misunderstood part of it, despite being an exceptionally intelligent person. Like many other Left-leaning Democrats, she is convinced that police brutality is a huge, under-acknowledged problem in the United States, and she therefore jumped to the conclusion that this wildly inflated ‘two-thirds’ figure was plausible.
     

    The staff at the New Yorker who read her piece also, we must assume, considered it to be plausible. The sentence was printed and, as of the time of writing, has not been corrected. There has been no uproar on social media. I reached out to both the New Yorker and Feldman for comment, and have not received replies.

     

    https://unherd.com/thepost/an-untrue-claim-in-the-new-yorker-speaks-volumes/

    Replies: @peterike, @njguy73, @ben tillman, @Kylie, @Hippopotamusdrome

    So I believe Lepore’s claim to be off by a factor of several hundred.

    Could anyone who works in project management survive if their project cost estimates were that inaccurate?

    It reminds me of one of my favorite Jon Stewart lines. He did an interview about why he satirizes the media, and he said of certain pundits “How do these people survive after writing books like Dow 36,000? Would a weatherman keep his job if he said that tomorrow it’s going to be 400 degrees and it’ll snow mice?”

  56. @Anon
    Stop using Google, and stop using Chrome. I switched to FireFox with DuckDuckGo as my default search engine months ago and never looked back. I didn't want Google to track my every move. Big brother is always watching.

    When I was on Chrome, whenever I came to this website, I would get a "Danger!" sign warning me that unz.com is not a "Secure" site, I guess what they meant was it's not a "safe space" for the snowflakes. Since I switched to FireFox, I never see that again.

    Fuck Google. It's just another media company, run by the same tribe as the one controlling old media. Always got to control the narrative. Whoever controls the narrative controls the country, and the world.

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar

    I switched to FireFox with DuckDuckGo as my default search engine months ago and never looked back.

    I haven’t trusted Firefox since they fired Brendan Eich many years ago.

    • Replies: @Clyde
    @Reg Cæsar


    I haven’t trusted Firefox since they fired Brendan Eich many years ago.
     
    Same here. I still have it but use it for just a few websites. Brave and Chrome are what I use.
  57. @The Wild Geese Howard
    Duck Duck Go is a decent alternative that is less intrusive to your privacy.

    Lately I've been using Qwant, based in France. It's pretty good.

    I think Yandex in Russia also offers a search engine.

    Replies: @Jack D

    Yandex in Russia also offers a search engine.

    Who could have imagined 50 years ago that if you wanted politically unbiased information you could no longer trust American sources and would have to get it from Russia.

    If you search for Steve Sailer on Yandex, this site comes up as the #2 link after his Twitter. On google, unz is at the moment #5.

    I have been using the Yandex Android browser on my tablet because (unlike Chrome for Android) it will run Chrome desktop extensions. (Don’t ask me why Google won’t allow extensions to run under Chrome for Android since it is technically feasible). Specifically I wanted to run the “Bypass Paywalls” extension which allows you to view most soft paywalled newspaper sites without a subscription (WSJ, Washington Post, etc.) .

    • Thanks: Dieter Kief
    • Replies: @J.Ross
    @Jack D

    It's not that Russians are angels, it's that you must use triangulation. Consider that al-Jazeera, at the time a darling of news junkies for its supposedly daring reporting, got wierdly quiet in 2011 about the biggest news story in their own backyard. Russian news about Putin is probably pretty biased. But in addition American media really has become universally totally worthless. American media, both information and entertainment, really has fallen off a cliff and abandoned every standard. A recent NPR piece was unlistenable not because of undisguised Marxist bias but because it sounded like the whole thing was put together by 13 year old girls, both in the character of the questions and in the actual tones of the voices. They spent minutes babbling about ineffable personal nonsense and reactions and "who she is," and asked a marine biologist if he felt romantic about the whales he studied. His shockingly polite answer: "uh, no." (I would have thrown something.) They didn't like this answer so they went over the whale romance issue repeatedly to make sure.

    , @Johann Ricke
    @Jack D


    I have been using the Yandex Android browser on my tablet because (unlike Chrome for Android) it will run Chrome desktop extensions. (Don’t ask me why Google won’t allow extensions to run under Chrome for Android since it is technically feasible). Specifically I wanted to run the “Bypass Paywalls” extension which allows you to view most soft paywalled newspaper sites without a subscription (WSJ, Washington Post, etc.) .
     
    This is fine, as long as you have no information that might be interesting to the KGB FSB:

    Russia's largest search engine, Yandex, has confirmed that it passed confidential data to the country's state security service, FSB.

    Yandex's online payment service gave the FSB personal information about users who donated money to an anti-corruption website launched by the Russian blogger Alexey Navalny.

    The disclosure follows a warning by Yandex about the legal and political risks associated with investing in Russia, ahead of its planned listing in New York.

    Yandex plans to raise up to $1bn (£600m) through a listing on Nasdaq.

    In its prospectus, issued to the US Securities and Exchange Commission last week, the company warned that businesses in Russia "may be subject to aggressive application of contradictory or ambiguous laws or regulations, or to politically-motivated actions".

    The Russian legal system is characterised in the document by:

    "inconsistencies between and among laws and regulations"
    "selective enforcement of laws or regulations, sometimes in ways that have been perceived as being motivated by political or financial considerations"
    "a perceived lack of judicial and prosecutorial independence from political, social and commercial forces"

    The company also warned that the degree of uncertainty will grow as the 2012 presidential elections approach.
    Market leader

    Russia is one of the few countries where Google is not the dominant search engine. Yandex holds 65% of the Russian internet search market while Google has 21.8%.

    "Yandex has a very good position in Russia and some of the former Soviet countries, being the most popular search engine", says analyst Lilit Gevorgyan from IHS Global Insight.

    "However, when you hear news that the FSB forced Yandex to reveal the payments through Yandex.Money, it hits the most painful spot: transparency and state intervention."

    Some experts say this episode will not affect the company's IPO plans.

    "All big funds who plan to invest a lot of money in Russia are already aware of these risks," says Georgy Voronkov, analyst from Investcafe research company.

    Yandex plans to follow in the footsteps of another Russian Internet group, Mail.ru, which at the end of last year raised $912m in London.
     

    Replies: @Jack D

    , @The Wild Geese Howard
    @Jack D

    Chrome for Android sounds like my employer's IT department, which blocks me from installing ad-block extensions on the browsers on my work PC.

    You would think they'd want employees to be able to block ads and conserve their precious bandwidth.

    You'd be wrong.

    Agree about having to get news from Russia.

    What a time to be alive.

    Replies: @Lot

    , @Clyde
    @Jack D

    https://github.com/iamadamdev/bypass-paywalls-chrome

    It seems to work. Tested it on the WSJ...... Thanks

  58. Anon[315] • Disclaimer says:

    There was a Panda algorithm update just the other day, blogged about by Aaron Wall. In general, Google algorithm updates since the original Panda have been pretty brutal for websites that have giant unchanging archives. A lot of non controversial sites have suffered from big drops in relevancy ranking. The thing that saves websites from this fate, inbound links, is just the thing that iSteve lacks because of its “everybody reads it, nobody admits to reading it” nature.

  59. @James B. Shearer
    Maybe just a glitch. Searching for the left wing lawyers guns and money blog was also failing. But things appear to be back to normal.

    Replies: @ben tillman, @Louis Renault, @Aardvark, @anon

    Maybe just a glitch. Searching for the left wing lawyers guns and money blog was also failing. But things appear to be back to normal.

    They are not.

  60. @Brás Cubas
    Nothing of the sort is happening when I google Steve Sailer. First occurrence: your twitter. Second: your Wikipedia page. Third occurrence: your blog.

    Replies: @ben tillman, @Adam Smith, @Jack D

    That’s not what he means. The blog entries are excluded from the search results.

    • Replies: @bossel
    @ben tillman

    Speaking of morons, this is what Steve wrote:


    Try Googling:

    Steve Sailer
     
  61. @peterike
    @syonredux


    Jill Lepore could hardly be more eminent.
     
    Jill Lepore is a useless hack. All the regulars at The New Yorker are useless hacks, genuinely terrible people. The magazine would still publish good reporting now and again (from others), but I cancelled a couple of years ago after the fiftieth anti-Trump cover.

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar

    Jill Lepore is a useless hack.

    I like her description of the prosecution of Indian captive Joshua Tefft after King Philip’s War: He was either a traitor, or a coward. Either way, he was no Englishman.

  62. @anon
    I Googled, you shameless beggar, and it's obvious Google did not 'memory-hole' anything. First hit was WIKI and the second was unz, which is perfectly consistent with what one expects Google algorithms to produce.

    You have a remarkable sense of persecution for someone who tries to come off as neutral and level-headed and "the voice of reasonableness and truth."

    Replies: @ben tillman

    I Googled, you shameless beggar, and it’s obvious Google did not ‘memory-hole’ anything. First hit was WIKI and the second was unz, which is perfectly consistent with what one expects Google algorithms to produce.

    You have a remarkable sense of persecution for someone who tries to come off as neutral and level-headed and “the voice of reasonableness and truth.”

    You’re a moron. Thousands of blog entries written by Steve have in fact been memory-holed.

    And:

    MORE THAN THREE HOURS LATER, THE MEMORY-HOLING HAS NOT BEEN UNDONE.

    • Disagree: Corvinus
  63. Anonymous[898] • Disclaimer says:
    @Corvinus
    "Google has memoryholed my blog as well. Try Googling: Steve Sailer"

    We did. It comes up on the first page.

    "Similarly, Google has disappeared..."

    No. Tucker's sites also comes up on the first page.

    Trying to one up your boy Trump with the gaslighting quotient? You know, he was widely panned for his interview with Fox News and Chris Wallace on Sunday. Acing a cognitive test, downplaying Covid-19**, being coy about whether he would accept the election results if he lost.

    https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1285520211593105413

    **Speaking of memory holing

    https://www.unz.com/isteve/arguably-wrong-ballparks-3-different-strageties

    https://www.unz.com/isteve/coronavirus-open-thread/

    Replies: @res, @Ben Kurtz, @Michael S, @Matthew Kelly, @SunBakedSuburb, @Anonymous, @Every court has its jester, @MEH 0910, @anon, @VinnyVette

    How long until the Russian collusion investigation gets Trump kicked out now, you TDS-addled sack o’ crap? Remember all your well-researched pronouncements on that topic, Corvy?

    You must be jonesing for some of the hard stuff. Go read some Seth Abramson or Max Boot to get another fix, you junky pervert.

  64. No problem here with Google search. After Googling “steve sailer”, his Twitter account, Wikipedia biography and blog are the three first picks in that order.

    I often see strange shifts in search results, whether they’re random or not I don’t know. Yesterday I Googled the Occidental Observer, but there were no links to the site on the first page of results (I think Wiki, SPLC and ADL were the first three in that order). I did it again just now. The first link is Wiki, and the next three are all to the Occidental Observer site.

  65. Anyone still using Google, FaceSuck or CensorTube has only themselves to blame. It would be nice if the government enforced existing law and came after these publishers for their content management while pretending to be an unmanaged platform, but that’s not happening. LEAVE. USE AN ALTERNATIVE. TELL PEOPLE AWAY FROM KEYBOARD TO USE ALTERNATIVES.

  66. Exactly how much vanity-googling do you have to do in order to catch yourself in one of these transient web wormholes?

  67. @Jack D
    @The Wild Geese Howard


    Yandex in Russia also offers a search engine.
     
    Who could have imagined 50 years ago that if you wanted politically unbiased information you could no longer trust American sources and would have to get it from Russia.

    If you search for Steve Sailer on Yandex, this site comes up as the #2 link after his Twitter. On google, unz is at the moment #5.

    I have been using the Yandex Android browser on my tablet because (unlike Chrome for Android) it will run Chrome desktop extensions. (Don't ask me why Google won't allow extensions to run under Chrome for Android since it is technically feasible). Specifically I wanted to run the "Bypass Paywalls" extension which allows you to view most soft paywalled newspaper sites without a subscription (WSJ, Washington Post, etc.) .

    Replies: @J.Ross, @Johann Ricke, @The Wild Geese Howard, @Clyde

    It’s not that Russians are angels, it’s that you must use triangulation. Consider that al-Jazeera, at the time a darling of news junkies for its supposedly daring reporting, got wierdly quiet in 2011 about the biggest news story in their own backyard. Russian news about Putin is probably pretty biased. But in addition American media really has become universally totally worthless. American media, both information and entertainment, really has fallen off a cliff and abandoned every standard. A recent NPR piece was unlistenable not because of undisguised Marxist bias but because it sounded like the whole thing was put together by 13 year old girls, both in the character of the questions and in the actual tones of the voices. They spent minutes babbling about ineffable personal nonsense and reactions and “who she is,” and asked a marine biologist if he felt romantic about the whales he studied. His shockingly polite answer: “uh, no.” (I would have thrown something.) They didn’t like this answer so they went over the whale romance issue repeatedly to make sure.

  68. @Kylie
    @Stan d Mute

    "'Ernest'? Yikes."

    Could be worse. Like "Endeavour". That'd be worse.

    Or my great-grandfather's first name. Ezekiel. He went by "E. Mason Roberts" all his life.

    Replies: @Rob McX

    Or my great-grandfather’s first name. Ezekiel. He went by “E. Mason Roberts” all his life.

    He wasn’t related to Oral Roberts, by any chance? That’s about the worst choice of name I’ve ever come across. It’s just not right for a preacher. He named his son Oral too.

    • Replies: @Kylie
    @Rob McX

    "He wasn’t related to Oral Roberts, by any chance? That’s about the worst choice of name I’ve ever come across. It’s just not right for a preacher. He named his son Oral too."

    Lol! No. Speaking about bad names, what about the mayor of Atlanta? Keisha Lance Bottoms.

    Replies: @Lot, @Rob McX, @Kyle, @Jim Bob Lassiter, @Stan d Mute

  69. @Clifford Brown
    @Matthew Kelly

    Imagine dressing like this. Imagine being a Billionaire and dressing like this. We are ruled by the decadent and the weak.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FRf9UxsM-NE

    Replies: @njguy73, @Grumpy, @Kyle

    Decadent is the word. It looks like they go to work in the same clothes they sleep in.

    Silicon Valley is bizarre. You need millions to live on a drab street in San Jose in a house that a plumber once owned, and the plumber dressed better than the millionaire who bought his house.

  70. @Dieter Kief
    @Ray P


    4. I read Steve Sailer for his presentation of a less-famous bloggers’ ideas
    5. Who is Steve Sailer? He has a blog?
     
    6. Who's this Ray P. man - somebody told me the other day, that he ain't real, and that you could look right through him.

    Hu?

    Hehe!

    Replies: @Ray P

    I am a figment of the imagination.

  71. Gateway Pundit reported the same issue.

    Google Disappears Gateway Pundit : Searching for “Gateway Pundit” only Brings Up Hit Pieces, BUT NO LINK TO WEBSITE …Update: They Did This With Top Conservative Websites! – Claim It Was ‘Technical Issue’

    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/07/google-disappears-gateway-pundit-searching-gateway-pundit-brings-hit-pieces-no-link-website/

  72. @James B. Shearer
    Maybe just a glitch. Searching for the left wing lawyers guns and money blog was also failing. But things appear to be back to normal.

    Replies: @ben tillman, @Louis Renault, @Aardvark, @anon

    This is a test of the Emergency BroadcastingBlacklisting System. This is just a test…..

  73. Glitch or test, I don’t know. But the tests are coming and we must be careful or be ready for some pain.

    I’ve always thought consumer VPNs were a honeypot.

    https://www.engadget.com/hong-kong-vpn-provider-data-leak-221451110.html

    I am less skepical of TOR. The Brave browser has a handy “New private window with TOR” drop-down. The Darknet is much faster than it was just a year ago. Why? I don’t know. Is Bezos letting AWS users host the gateways? isteve works fine over TOR for the text. Video links do not work.

  74. @YetAnotherAnon
    OT (startpage isn't bad either btw)

    "Teen stabbed at knife awareness course"


    A young offender stabbed another teenager to death at a community centre while on a knife awareness course, a court has heard.

    The 17-year-old boy, who cannot be named, knifed Hakim Sillah, 18, twice in the chest at the west London centre on 7 November last year, Isleworth Crown Court was told.

    Prosecutors said there was "a cruel irony" that Mr Sillah was stabbed while attending a weapons awareness course.
     

    That's one way of putting it.

    Michelle Nelson QC, prosecuting, said all participants at Hillingdon Civic Centre had been risk assessed before the session, which was run by the Youth Offending Teams (YOTS), and "those classified as high risk were precluded from attending".

    "Both the young men must have been risk assessed, but the sad reality is that both attended that course carrying knives," she said.

     

    Replies: @Rob McX

    I’d bet these “knife awareness courses” are compulsory as an alternative to prison for potentially homicidal “young offenders” who’ve been convicted of some knife-related crime. I suppose the authorities were foolish enough not to have a metal detector at each entrance.

    • Replies: @Coemgen
    @Rob McX


    I suppose the authorities were foolish enough not to have a metal detector at each entrance.
     
    Better yet, just have someone at the door who can profile those who wish to enter. If someone looks like an undesirable; send him packing.

    Remember when profiling was the amazing technique that FBI agents used to identify criminals? What happened to that?
  75. @James B. Shearer
    Maybe just a glitch. Searching for the left wing lawyers guns and money blog was also failing. But things appear to be back to normal.

    Replies: @ben tillman, @Louis Renault, @Aardvark, @anon

    I didn’t try it but I’m sure that a search for “honest mainstream journalist” appears memoryholed, but that’s because nobody could remember when there ever was one.

  76. anonymous[245] • Disclaimer says:

    Off Topic: Mexican Male Karen checks off everything we expect on White Karen’s checklist.

    I suspect this immature brattiness, whether male or female, entails a failing on the father’s part. There was nobody around who cared enough to tell him/her to knock off the shit, when he/she was a child, so acting like a disgruntled teen girl became normalized.

  77. @Liberty Mike
    Well, we can be sure that the Googlemeister did not memory-hole Steve upon the basis of his coronadoom.

    Replies: @Je Suis Omar Mateen, @Redman

    “Well, we can be sure that the Googlemeister did not memory-hole Steve upon the basis of his coronadoom.”

    I meant to hit disagree. ZHedge has orgasmically shilled for CoronaHoax the past five months and was attacked anyway by g00gle because commenters overwhelmingly called BS on the hoax. Oh yeah baby, g00gle reads our comments, QED.

    • Replies: @Liberty Mike
    @Je Suis Omar Mateen

    Good observation.

  78. @res
    @Corvinus

    We? The only thing sadder than your comments would be if it took more than one person to write them.

    This memory holing glitch in the matrix is validating my idea to start recording what Google searches record at different times. The changes are interesting.

    Replies: @Alexander Turok, @AKAHorace, @Hypnotoad666

    I googled Steve Sailer. The most interesting thing that I found was that nine years ago he wrote a film review for the Huffington Post. This could never happen now, an editor would be cancelled.

    • Replies: @Steve Sailer
    @AKAHorace

    Did I?

    I don't recall ever writing for the Huffington Post.

    Replies: @anon, @El Dato, @MEH 0910, @Gordo

  79. @res
    @Corvinus

    We? The only thing sadder than your comments would be if it took more than one person to write them.

    This memory holing glitch in the matrix is validating my idea to start recording what Google searches record at different times. The changes are interesting.

    Replies: @Alexander Turok, @AKAHorace, @Hypnotoad666

    This memory holing glitch in the matrix is validating my idea to start recording what Google searches record at different times. The changes are interesting.

    That is an excellent idea. It doesn’t seem like it would be that hard to write some script that just constantly Googles terms and logs the results. In fact, you’d think someone would be doing this already for commercial purposes like tracking marketing trends or whatever.

    • Replies: @Anon
    @Hypnotoad666



    This memory holing glitch in the matrix is validating my idea to start recording what Google searches record at different times. The changes are interesting.
     
    That is an excellent idea. It doesn’t seem like it would be that hard to write some script that just constantly Googles terms and logs the results. In fact, you’d think someone would be doing this already for commercial purposes like tracking marketing trends or whatever.
     
    This is a standard SEO task. There are local applications, like Advanced Web Ranking, and many online services, like Ahrefs.

    They cost money.

    You enter:

    -- URLs of pages that you want to track

    -- URLs of pages of competitors you want to track

    -- Lists of keywords (search queries, which can be phrases) that people looking for your site might tend to use. You try to verify that these are popular keywords, since who cares if you come up number 1 for a search nobody uses. To this end there are addition SEO tools to help you evaulate keywords, but it’s gotten harder to do as Google has obfuscated search terms.

    Your software then runs these search terms through Google, Google Mobile, and other search engines on a schedule. Google doesn’t like automated searches and blocks them if detected, so they searches need to be spaced out and randomized.

    The end result after a period of time are graphs showing over time the ranking of your pages, your competition’s pages, and other pages, for each keyword or for bundles of keywords.

    I’ve done this for many, many years, and I can tell you that sites disappear from the rankings all the time for no apparent reason. In my opinion it is unlikely that this had a political cause. There was a core Google algorithm change in early May, and it has been rolling out ever since. These changes happen multiple times per year. There are tools to track the effects of these algorithm changes and SEO websites and forums that report on them, like Moz, examining large lists of diverse websites looking for patterns. Nobody outside of the conservative blogosphere is reporting any political slant to the latest ranking losers at this point.

  80. @Liberty Mike
    Well, we can be sure that the Googlemeister did not memory-hole Steve upon the basis of his coronadoom.

    Replies: @Je Suis Omar Mateen, @Redman

    But Steve has been notably silent on the Wuflu for some time now. And especially now that CA is one of the supposed centers of concern.

    I miss Hail, who always had some interesting data to share on how this wasn’t the plague.

    • Replies: @Simon Tugmutton
    @Redman

    This is Hail's blog:

    https://hailtoyou.wordpress.com/

    , @Jim Don Bob
    @Redman

    Here is Angelo Codevilla on TPTB using the Kung Flu to strengthen their grip on power: https://americanmind.org/essays/the-covid-coup/

    Replies: @Liberty Mike

    , @MEH 0910
    @Redman


    I miss Hail, who always had some interesting data to share on how this wasn’t the plague.
     
    The day after you posted your comment, Hail put up a new piece on his blog, his first since June 28th:

    https://hailtoyou.wordpress.com/2020/07/22/on-white-fragility-and-the-academia-to-mainstream-pipeline-an-investigation-into-white-fragility-theory-and-its-life-cycle-from-2011-to-2020/

    And here I thought the coronavirus had got him. Hail still hasn't resumed commenting here at Unz Review.

    Replies: @MEH 0910

  81. this was probably just a test run for blocking out all the rightist sites that they plan to block in the near future.

    it’s the fact that bing is really pretty good now, and that there are other, smaller alternatives as well, that pretty much protects google from any anti-trust activity. of course those other resources could be compromised too eventually, but for now, they aren’t. remember, they’re still in business competition, and as google gets worse for real world use, the competitors pick up market share as long as they remain more useful.

    to get rid of all of them, they’d have to be compromised all at once, even foreign based ones, and stay that way. and setting up a basic version of a web spider/robot and a server farm with load balancers isn’t that hard compared to other IT ventures. this is one of the few places where the right actually could “derr, just build your own search engine.”

  82. @Prof. Woland
    One other thing, it looks like Trump is getting ready to drop the bomb. Part of the whole Q signaling about the storm is that there would be radio silence and a shut down of communications by the black hats once the SHTF.

    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/07/breaking-us-attorney-john-durham-negotiations-people-guilty-pleas-russia-collusion-scandal/

    Trump is going for the throat with the Durham investigation and if he can get the lower level schlubs to plead guilty and turn on their former superiors, that will simultaneously cut the legs out from under the left while checkmating the next level of operatives. Expect more of this.

    Replies: @BenKenobi, @Neoconned

    Forgive me for green-texting on Unz, but:

    >plan trusting in 2020

    Of course if the TrumpStaffel were to be formed tomorrow I’d enlist immediately. I want to believe.

  83. @syonredux

    Reading the latest copy of the New Yorker magazine, published exactly a week ago, I came across this sentence in a piece by Jill Lepore:

     


    One study suggests that two-thirds of Americans between the ages of fifteen and thirty-four who were treated in emergency rooms suffered from injuries inflicted by police and security guards, about as many people as the number of pedestrians injured by motor vehicles.
    - JILL LEPORE, NEW YORKER
     

    This sentence jumped out to me. How could it possibly be true that ‘two-thirds’ of all Americans aged 15-34 visiting emergency rooms had been injured by police or security guards, given the very many other reasons why people might present for emergency treatment? In the online version, there is no hyperlink to the research (although the article does contain hyperlinks), and the study’s authors are not named.
     

    Jill Lepore could hardly be more eminent. She is a professor of American history at Harvard, the recipient of a long list of awards, and a longstanding staff writer at the New Yorker, as well as a contributor at many other well regarded publications.

     


    I sought out the study she was referring to, and found it: a 2016 paper, whose lead author, Justin Feldman, was a doctoral student at Harvard at the time. Soon after publication, the findings were described in a Harvard press release, and also reported on by The Guardian.
     

    And it turns out I was right — the ‘two-thirds’ claim is not true. Not even close.

     


    I did my best to work out a rough estimate of the true proportion of 15-34 year olds visiting the ER who had suffered legal intervention injuries, and arrived at a figure of 0.2% (you can follow my working in this thread). So I believe Lepore’s claim to be off by a factor of several hundred.

     


    Why does this one sentence matter? Well, firstly, it misinforms readers, several of whom (based on my Twitter search for the article’s URL) also alighted on this claim, but unlike me took it on trust. Secondly, and perhaps more importantly, it tells us something about the political climate in a publication like the New Yorker, which was once famous for its rigorous fact checking.
     

    We know that political bias warps cognition, sometimes catastrophically, and this is, I think, an example of that in action. Lepore read Feldman’s research and she misunderstood part of it, despite being an exceptionally intelligent person. Like many other Left-leaning Democrats, she is convinced that police brutality is a huge, under-acknowledged problem in the United States, and she therefore jumped to the conclusion that this wildly inflated ‘two-thirds’ figure was plausible.
     

    The staff at the New Yorker who read her piece also, we must assume, considered it to be plausible. The sentence was printed and, as of the time of writing, has not been corrected. There has been no uproar on social media. I reached out to both the New Yorker and Feldman for comment, and have not received replies.

     

    https://unherd.com/thepost/an-untrue-claim-in-the-new-yorker-speaks-volumes/

    Replies: @peterike, @njguy73, @ben tillman, @Kylie, @Hippopotamusdrome

    One study suggests that two-thirds of Americans between the ages of fifteen and thirty-four who were treated in emergency rooms suffered from injuries inflicted by police and security guards, about as many people as the number of pedestrians injured by motor vehicles.
    – JILL LEPORE, NEW YORKER

    That’s almost as stupid as the TV morons who thought the 500 millon dollars Bloomberg spent on his candidacy would suffice to pay 330 million Americans a million dollars each.

    How could someone be so utterly detached from the real world?

  84. Steve, when I Google “Steve Sailer”, these are the results:
    1. Your Wikipedia entry
    2. Your Twitter
    3. Your pinned Tweet
    4. Your entry in Wikiquote
    5. Your blog.
    6. Your author page on unz.com

    @CouldntBRighter

  85. also what this means is they know who you are. they know who Unz is. you’re on their radar. and they’re ready to delete you from the world. contrary to Ron Unz’s foolish sentiments a few weeks ago.

    when Joe Biden is President, this site will disappear from the internet within 2 years. i don’t mean you’ll be removed from search results. i mean government lawyers will lean on whoever they have to lean on to make your website go away by force of law. the only reason it won’t disappear immediately is because there will be some legal back and forth like what is happening with vdare. but eventually, the government democrat lawyers will make you disappear. they have unlimited resources and time. Weissmann and Rosenstein might even come back specifically to coordinate the operation.

    am i the only guy here who can think tactically, let alone strategically. my god. what a bunch of savants. i didn’t even have to actually graduate West Point to understand this stuff. this is how a war works.

  86. post across masthead “Banned on Google!”

    Meanwhile remind Republicans everywhere, every day, of all of the times they have stood in the way of enforcement of anti-trust in the last 30 years.

    “That’s not who we are”

    Indeed. Brilliant. Indeed.

  87. One of the newer search engines is showing some advantage over Google, StartPage, Bing, DuckDuckGo, and Yandex for doing research on the more censored, truth-hidden topics,

    It has a dorky name but its ‘powered by IBM Watson’ AI-related algorithms have quickly turned up stuff I couldn’t find re the above, and Steve Sailer is quite prominent on it

    https://yippy.com/

    One of the documents at the EU Commission on the crimes of Google controlling the internet – looked at through the prism of Google’s support for the CIA-Mossad Wikipedia and its fundraising fraud – is this one below.

    For those who don’t know, Wikipedia is flat-out CIA-Mossad, its supremo Jimbo Wales recruited out of selling porno, his site helping paedos launder their bio. Wales parties with Israeli Presidents and got a $1 mil prize from Tel Aviv U. Many Wiki edits are straight from Langley / Tel Aviv. Wiki offers US political donors fake bio rights, plus slander rights against their victims. Wikimedia is known in Europe as a criminal organisation involved in attacks on EU citizens.

    EU police and prosecutor report on crimes of Wikipedia with Google, Wikimedia fundraising fraud, and the ’20 Major Techniques of Wikipedia Deception’
    http://pastebin.com/BeppgiMJ

    • Thanks: YetAnotherAnon
  88. @Rob McX
    @Kylie


    Or my great-grandfather’s first name. Ezekiel. He went by “E. Mason Roberts” all his life.
     
    He wasn't related to Oral Roberts, by any chance? That's about the worst choice of name I've ever come across. It's just not right for a preacher. He named his son Oral too.

    Replies: @Kylie

    “He wasn’t related to Oral Roberts, by any chance? That’s about the worst choice of name I’ve ever come across. It’s just not right for a preacher. He named his son Oral too.”

    Lol! No. Speaking about bad names, what about the mayor of Atlanta? Keisha Lance Bottoms.

    • Replies: @Lot
    @Kylie

    “ Keisha Lance Bottoms”

    Maker of fine belted sapphic accessories.

    , @Rob McX
    @Kylie

    Actually, it's one field of endeavour where blacks don't need affirmative action, so they can't be allowed to compete in the contest - otherwise this guy would wind hands down.

    , @Kyle
    @Kylie

    Keisha lance bottoms isn’t a bad name. She’s pretty. I wouldn’t mind..., you can see where I’m going with this.

    , @Jim Bob Lassiter
    @Kylie

    At least Keisha has an excuse. She's black. This Oral business defies explanation.

    , @Stan d Mute
    @Kylie


    Speaking about bad names, what about the mayor of Atlanta? Keisha Lance Bottoms.
     
    Say, does she have a brother named Keister Bottoms?
  89. @SunBakedSuburb
    @Corvinus

    "We did."

    The royal "We"? Or "We" as in Team Corvinus; a collection of New Left ladies who have given up coitus for social activism?

    Replies: @Corvinus

    “The royal “We”?

    “We” as in people who NOTICE. Mr. Sailer is feigning outrage and being hypocritical in his own right about “memory holing”, but I would not expect you to admit it. That is the major point here.

    Now, as far as free speech is concerned, recall the Supreme Court has ruled in several cases that if a private company/organization creates a public forum for speech, the fact that it is a private company/organization allows its immunity from the First and Fourteenth Amendments (Hudgens v. NLRB, Lloyd Corp. v. Tanner, and Central Hardware Co. v. NLRB). Perhaps the Big Bear’s lawsuit can make it to the Supreme Court and serve as the impetus for change, considering how today’s “cancel culture” is akin to the censorship of the 1950’s. And maybe what is needed is a corporate personhood amendment that can reign in social media companies. Then again, the EU may actually set the standards for other nations to follow.

    https://www.irishtimes.com/news/world/europe/why-facebook-wants-the-eu-to-decide-the-limits-of-free-speech-1.4270126

    Different approaches taken by two of the biggest social media giants in recent days have highlighted the high stakes of managing problematic online content. As protests against the killing of black people by police swept the United States, president Donald Trump wrote on Twitter and Facebook “Any difficulty and we will assume control but, when the looting starts, the shooting starts”.
    In a first in its dealings with the US president, Twitter obscured the post with a warning label, saying it violated its rules against glorifying violence.

    But Facebook took a different approach, leaving the president’s post as it was. Chief executive Mark Zuckerberg said that while he found the post “deeply offensive”, it did not violate his company’s policies.

    Both companies have faced consequences.

    Twitter has been the focus of a backlash from Trump, who threatened to “strongly regulate” social media companies or “close them down”. For Facebook, the heat came from employees who openly criticised the company’s inaction. Two of them publicly quit.

    What kind of posts should not be allowed on social media, who should make those decisions, and how, is a regulatory puzzle. And Zuckerberg has asked the European Commission to solve it. In a public discussion with internal market commissioner Thierry Breton last month, the Facebook boss asked the commission to set rules for social media companies to follow. “Basically, the platforms shouldn’t be left to govern themselves,” Zuckerberg said. Europe had the opportunity to set a standard for the world, he argued, and should do so before China did.”

    It might seem a strange position for Zuckerberg to take, but it makes sense.

    Such platforms are too big and too famous to host harmful speech without damage to their reputations. If there are to be rules, it’s easier for Facebook to follow one set of them for all of the EU rather than differing laws in each country. And it’s easier if the company does not have to do the expensive and difficult work of solving the riddle itself.

    But as your soy boy Alt Right leader Vox Day pronounced, focus on building your own platforms to avoid the machinations and “convergence” of Google, Twitter, and Facebook.

    Finally, per usual, “cancel culture” and “political correctness” needs context. Try to follow along.

    Dennis Miller and Bill Maher –>

    https://jacobinmag.com/2020/07/cancel-culture-harpers-letter-free-speech

    Conservatives who historically tended to oppose free speech and held the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) as chief in its pantheon of villains have suddenly rebranded themselves as free expression’s greatest defenders. But while they were happy to defend alt-right provocateur Milo Yiannopoulos’s right to express xenophobic and misogynist comments, when he began talking about the messy complications of the age of consent among gay men, they threw him under the bus.

    Donald Trump has worked to clamp down on trade unions “salting” workplaces, that is, the century-old practice of getting a trade-union-friendly person hired at a workplace that is targeted for unionization. And perhaps most notoriously, the same man who at Mount Rushmore denounced a “far-left fascist [sic] cultural revolution,” calling for “free and open debate” instead, only weeks before used the National Guard to teargas and clear nonviolent protesters from the streets of Washington for the sake of a cheap photo-op.

    One might expect the liberal-left to be among the strongest defenders of free speech at work, and of the right of workers to say what they wish, but too many have enthusiastically called upon employers to fire workers for alleged reactionary speech outside of the workplace, in effect cheering on at-will termination of employment, and embraced the multibillion-dollar human resources department–organized and employer-supervised “sensitivity training” industry, imposing top-down workshops, where workers are petrified they might say the wrong thing.

    https://www.harpersbazaar.com/uk/culture/a33296561/cancel-culture-a-force-for-good-or-a-threat-to-free-speech

    The idea of pushing someone out – because they have said or done something perceived to be offensive – leaves no room for growth or learning. Matt Haig describes cancel culture as “anti-progress because it is anti-change”. “Cancelling people pushes them away and makes them more likely to find spaces where bad views are the norm,” he says. “Obviously, if someone has been convicted of, say, violence or sexual assault then they need to be punished, but cancel culture isn’t that. Cancel culture, as I see it, involves the shutting down of different perspectives and treating people like mere disposable artefacts in the cultural economy.”

    The problem with cancel culture is that it has become too broad, and near meaningless. R Kelly was cancelled over decades of sexual-assault allegations, yet so too was Jodie Comer for dating a Republican. There is no proportion. It is used in so many different contexts, both heavy and light, that it oversimplifies, and loses its weight because it allows those who have engaged in dangerous and/or harmful rhetoric and behaviour to ride on the backlash.

    In the eyes of cancel culture, people are reduced to good or bad with no room for anything in-between. “The process is like air-brushing someone or something out,” says Beresford, “It doesn’t allow for the possibility that two sides could ever agree, or learn from each other, or could persuade each other of their arguments – or even agree to disagree.”

    THE BATTLE AGAINST ‘HATE SPEECH’ ON COLLEGE CAMPUSES GIVES RISE TO A GENERATION THAT HATES SPEECH–NINA BURLEIGH, NEWSWEEK, 5/26/16

    Until it was squashed by administrative decree, Williams College sophomore Zachary Wood headed up an on-campus lecture series called Uncomfortable Learning. Wood, an African-American who grew up in one of the poorer neighborhoods in Washington, D.C., is a self-described liberal, devoted to learning and books. He liked inviting controversial speakers, usually from the political right, to challenge young progressives cloistered in a collegiate utopia at one of the nationʻs great small liberal arts institutions. Last year, though, Wood encountered the limits of free speech at Williams. First, he invited Suzanne Venker, an anti-feminist author and lecturer. After a campus and social media outcry, Woodʻs fellow Uncomfortable Learning leaders disinvited her and then, to avoid further shaming on social media, resigned from the organization.

    Wood then formed a club of one and invited an even more confrontational speaker, British-American writer John Derbyshire. After suggesting that blacks are more antisocial than whites, he wrote that a small percentage is ferociously hostile to whites and will go to great lengths to inconvenience or harm us, while around half will go along [with violence] passively if the five percent take leadership in some event. An hour after Wood advertised Derbyshireʻs speech with a Facebook post, he was swarmed. On Facebook, someone wrote that Wood deserved the oil and whip, a reference to a punishment for slaves. Others accused him of providing a space on campus for hate speech,and began debating how to file a complaint against him. When Wood replied to one critic, “So you would never bring a speaker on the far right, like Venker and Derbyshire? I value the work I do with UL“, someone retorted,“Iʼd rather sell crack first.“

    A few days passed, the outrage kept building, and the university president disinvited Derbyshire. Wood believes students need to hear provocateurs like Derbyshire in order to formulate their own thoughts and challenges. “What is hate speech to begin with,” he asks. “Itʼs what people don t like to hear. Trump has the support of a considerable portion of the American electorate. With someone like him running for president, speaking on national television every day, saying controversial things about the most important issues of our time, it is imperative that we confront offensive views and afford college students the opportunity to learn how to engage constructively with people they vehemently disagree with. Shielding students from microaggressions does not improve their ability to argue effectively; it coddles them. At a time like this, uncomfortable learning is vital.“

    • Troll: YetAnotherAnon
    • Replies: @SunBakedSuburb
    @Corvinus

    So, the royal We or a gaggle of ancient New Left ladies?

    Replies: @Corvinus

    , @Anonymous
    @Corvinus

    Jesus, you must be a blast to be with...

    , @Rob
    @Corvinus

    I have the same comment for you that I had for Johnny Walker:

    Jackass,

    Use a MORE tag

    Like that.

  90. @syonredux

    Reading the latest copy of the New Yorker magazine, published exactly a week ago, I came across this sentence in a piece by Jill Lepore:

     


    One study suggests that two-thirds of Americans between the ages of fifteen and thirty-four who were treated in emergency rooms suffered from injuries inflicted by police and security guards, about as many people as the number of pedestrians injured by motor vehicles.
    - JILL LEPORE, NEW YORKER
     

    This sentence jumped out to me. How could it possibly be true that ‘two-thirds’ of all Americans aged 15-34 visiting emergency rooms had been injured by police or security guards, given the very many other reasons why people might present for emergency treatment? In the online version, there is no hyperlink to the research (although the article does contain hyperlinks), and the study’s authors are not named.
     

    Jill Lepore could hardly be more eminent. She is a professor of American history at Harvard, the recipient of a long list of awards, and a longstanding staff writer at the New Yorker, as well as a contributor at many other well regarded publications.

     


    I sought out the study she was referring to, and found it: a 2016 paper, whose lead author, Justin Feldman, was a doctoral student at Harvard at the time. Soon after publication, the findings were described in a Harvard press release, and also reported on by The Guardian.
     

    And it turns out I was right — the ‘two-thirds’ claim is not true. Not even close.

     


    I did my best to work out a rough estimate of the true proportion of 15-34 year olds visiting the ER who had suffered legal intervention injuries, and arrived at a figure of 0.2% (you can follow my working in this thread). So I believe Lepore’s claim to be off by a factor of several hundred.

     


    Why does this one sentence matter? Well, firstly, it misinforms readers, several of whom (based on my Twitter search for the article’s URL) also alighted on this claim, but unlike me took it on trust. Secondly, and perhaps more importantly, it tells us something about the political climate in a publication like the New Yorker, which was once famous for its rigorous fact checking.
     

    We know that political bias warps cognition, sometimes catastrophically, and this is, I think, an example of that in action. Lepore read Feldman’s research and she misunderstood part of it, despite being an exceptionally intelligent person. Like many other Left-leaning Democrats, she is convinced that police brutality is a huge, under-acknowledged problem in the United States, and she therefore jumped to the conclusion that this wildly inflated ‘two-thirds’ figure was plausible.
     

    The staff at the New Yorker who read her piece also, we must assume, considered it to be plausible. The sentence was printed and, as of the time of writing, has not been corrected. There has been no uproar on social media. I reached out to both the New Yorker and Feldman for comment, and have not received replies.

     

    https://unherd.com/thepost/an-untrue-claim-in-the-new-yorker-speaks-volumes/

    Replies: @peterike, @njguy73, @ben tillman, @Kylie, @Hippopotamusdrome

    “Jill Lepore could hardly be more eminent. She is a professor of American history at Harvard, the recipient of a long list of awards….”

    Like that other eminent product of Harvard, historian and plagiarist, Doris Kearns Goodwin. Am I suggesting Lepore is also a plagiarist? No. But I am suggesting both use others’ material without the rigorous intellectual honesty one should be able to expect from eminent, Harvard-educated historians.

  91. @Kylie
    @Rob McX

    "He wasn’t related to Oral Roberts, by any chance? That’s about the worst choice of name I’ve ever come across. It’s just not right for a preacher. He named his son Oral too."

    Lol! No. Speaking about bad names, what about the mayor of Atlanta? Keisha Lance Bottoms.

    Replies: @Lot, @Rob McX, @Kyle, @Jim Bob Lassiter, @Stan d Mute

    “ Keisha Lance Bottoms”

    Maker of fine belted sapphic accessories.

  92. Anon[145] • Disclaimer says:
    @Hypnotoad666
    @res


    This memory holing glitch in the matrix is validating my idea to start recording what Google searches record at different times. The changes are interesting.
     
    That is an excellent idea. It doesn't seem like it would be that hard to write some script that just constantly Googles terms and logs the results. In fact, you'd think someone would be doing this already for commercial purposes like tracking marketing trends or whatever.

    Replies: @Anon

    This memory holing glitch in the matrix is validating my idea to start recording what Google searches record at different times. The changes are interesting.

    That is an excellent idea. It doesn’t seem like it would be that hard to write some script that just constantly Googles terms and logs the results. In fact, you’d think someone would be doing this already for commercial purposes like tracking marketing trends or whatever.

    This is a standard SEO task. There are local applications, like Advanced Web Ranking, and many online services, like Ahrefs.

    They cost money.

    You enter:

    — URLs of pages that you want to track

    — URLs of pages of competitors you want to track

    — Lists of keywords (search queries, which can be phrases) that people looking for your site might tend to use. You try to verify that these are popular keywords, since who cares if you come up number 1 for a search nobody uses. To this end there are addition SEO tools to help you evaulate keywords, but it’s gotten harder to do as Google has obfuscated search terms.

    Your software then runs these search terms through Google, Google Mobile, and other search engines on a schedule. Google doesn’t like automated searches and blocks them if detected, so they searches need to be spaced out and randomized.

    The end result after a period of time are graphs showing over time the ranking of your pages, your competition’s pages, and other pages, for each keyword or for bundles of keywords.

    I’ve done this for many, many years, and I can tell you that sites disappear from the rankings all the time for no apparent reason. In my opinion it is unlikely that this had a political cause. There was a core Google algorithm change in early May, and it has been rolling out ever since. These changes happen multiple times per year. There are tools to track the effects of these algorithm changes and SEO websites and forums that report on them, like Moz, examining large lists of diverse websites looking for patterns. Nobody outside of the conservative blogosphere is reporting any political slant to the latest ranking losers at this point.

    • Thanks: Jim Don Bob, Hypnotoad666
  93. @Corvinus
    @SunBakedSuburb

    "The royal “We”?

    "We" as in people who NOTICE. Mr. Sailer is feigning outrage and being hypocritical in his own right about "memory holing", but I would not expect you to admit it. That is the major point here.

    Now, as far as free speech is concerned, recall the Supreme Court has ruled in several cases that if a private company/organization creates a public forum for speech, the fact that it is a private company/organization allows its immunity from the First and Fourteenth Amendments (Hudgens v. NLRB, Lloyd Corp. v. Tanner, and Central Hardware Co. v. NLRB). Perhaps the Big Bear's lawsuit can make it to the Supreme Court and serve as the impetus for change, considering how today's "cancel culture" is akin to the censorship of the 1950's. And maybe what is needed is a corporate personhood amendment that can reign in social media companies. Then again, the EU may actually set the standards for other nations to follow.

    https://www.irishtimes.com/news/world/europe/why-facebook-wants-the-eu-to-decide-the-limits-of-free-speech-1.4270126


    Different approaches taken by two of the biggest social media giants in recent days have highlighted the high stakes of managing problematic online content. As protests against the killing of black people by police swept the United States, president Donald Trump wrote on Twitter and Facebook “Any difficulty and we will assume control but, when the looting starts, the shooting starts”.
    In a first in its dealings with the US president, Twitter obscured the post with a warning label, saying it violated its rules against glorifying violence.

    But Facebook took a different approach, leaving the president’s post as it was. Chief executive Mark Zuckerberg said that while he found the post “deeply offensive”, it did not violate his company’s policies.

    Both companies have faced consequences.

    Twitter has been the focus of a backlash from Trump, who threatened to “strongly regulate” social media companies or “close them down”. For Facebook, the heat came from employees who openly criticised the company’s inaction. Two of them publicly quit.

    What kind of posts should not be allowed on social media, who should make those decisions, and how, is a regulatory puzzle. And Zuckerberg has asked the European Commission to solve it. In a public discussion with internal market commissioner Thierry Breton last month, the Facebook boss asked the commission to set rules for social media companies to follow. “Basically, the platforms shouldn’t be left to govern themselves,” Zuckerberg said. Europe had the opportunity to set a standard for the world, he argued, and should do so before China did."

    It might seem a strange position for Zuckerberg to take, but it makes sense.

    Such platforms are too big and too famous to host harmful speech without damage to their reputations. If there are to be rules, it’s easier for Facebook to follow one set of them for all of the EU rather than differing laws in each country. And it’s easier if the company does not have to do the expensive and difficult work of solving the riddle itself.

    But as your soy boy Alt Right leader Vox Day pronounced, focus on building your own platforms to avoid the machinations and "convergence" of Google, Twitter, and Facebook.
     

    Finally, per usual, "cancel culture" and "political correctness" needs context. Try to follow along.

    Dennis Miller and Bill Maher --> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ipwMa5uT5es

    https://jacobinmag.com/2020/07/cancel-culture-harpers-letter-free-speech


    Conservatives who historically tended to oppose free speech and held the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) as chief in its pantheon of villains have suddenly rebranded themselves as free expression’s greatest defenders. But while they were happy to defend alt-right provocateur Milo Yiannopoulos’s right to express xenophobic and misogynist comments, when he began talking about the messy complications of the age of consent among gay men, they threw him under the bus.

    Donald Trump has worked to clamp down on trade unions “salting” workplaces, that is, the century-old practice of getting a trade-union-friendly person hired at a workplace that is targeted for unionization. And perhaps most notoriously, the same man who at Mount Rushmore denounced a “far-left fascist [sic] cultural revolution,” calling for “free and open debate” instead, only weeks before used the National Guard to teargas and clear nonviolent protesters from the streets of Washington for the sake of a cheap photo-op.

    One might expect the liberal-left to be among the strongest defenders of free speech at work, and of the right of workers to say what they wish, but too many have enthusiastically called upon employers to fire workers for alleged reactionary speech outside of the workplace, in effect cheering on at-will termination of employment, and embraced the multibillion-dollar human resources department–organized and employer-supervised “sensitivity training” industry, imposing top-down workshops, where workers are petrified they might say the wrong thing.

     

    https://www.harpersbazaar.com/uk/culture/a33296561/cancel-culture-a-force-for-good-or-a-threat-to-free-speech

    The idea of pushing someone out - because they have said or done something perceived to be offensive - leaves no room for growth or learning. Matt Haig describes cancel culture as “anti-progress because it is anti-change”. “Cancelling people pushes them away and makes them more likely to find spaces where bad views are the norm,” he says. “Obviously, if someone has been convicted of, say, violence or sexual assault then they need to be punished, but cancel culture isn’t that. Cancel culture, as I see it, involves the shutting down of different perspectives and treating people like mere disposable artefacts in the cultural economy.”

    ...

    The problem with cancel culture is that it has become too broad, and near meaningless. R Kelly was cancelled over decades of sexual-assault allegations, yet so too was Jodie Comer for dating a Republican. There is no proportion. It is used in so many different contexts, both heavy and light, that it oversimplifies, and loses its weight because it allows those who have engaged in dangerous and/or harmful rhetoric and behaviour to ride on the backlash.

    ...

    In the eyes of cancel culture, people are reduced to good or bad with no room for anything in-between. “The process is like air-brushing someone or something out,” says Beresford, “It doesn’t allow for the possibility that two sides could ever agree, or learn from each other, or could persuade each other of their arguments – or even agree to disagree.”
     

    THE BATTLE AGAINST ‘HATE SPEECH’ ON COLLEGE CAMPUSES GIVES RISE TO A GENERATION THAT HATES SPEECH--NINA BURLEIGH, NEWSWEEK, 5/26/16

    Until it was squashed by administrative decree, Williams College sophomore Zachary Wood headed up an on-campus lecture series called Uncomfortable Learning. Wood, an African-American who grew up in one of the poorer neighborhoods in Washington, D.C., is a self-described liberal, devoted to learning and books. He liked inviting controversial speakers, usually from the political right, to challenge young progressives cloistered in a collegiate utopia at one of the nationʻs great small liberal arts institutions. Last year, though, Wood encountered the limits of free speech at Williams. First, he invited Suzanne Venker, an anti-feminist author and lecturer. After a campus and social media outcry, Woodʻs fellow Uncomfortable Learning leaders disinvited her and then, to avoid further shaming on social media, resigned from the organization.

    Wood then formed a club of one and invited an even more confrontational speaker, British-American writer John Derbyshire. After suggesting that blacks are more antisocial than whites, he wrote that a small percentage is ferociously hostile to whites and will go to great lengths to inconvenience or harm us, while around half will go along [with violence] passively if the five percent take leadership in some event. An hour after Wood advertised Derbyshireʻs speech with a Facebook post, he was swarmed. On Facebook, someone wrote that Wood deserved the oil and whip, a reference to a punishment for slaves. Others accused him of providing a space on campus for hate speech,and began debating how to file a complaint against him. When Wood replied to one critic, “So you would never bring a speaker on the far right, like Venker and Derbyshire? I value the work I do with UL“, someone retorted,“Iʼd rather sell crack first.“

    A few days passed, the outrage kept building, and the university president disinvited Derbyshire. Wood believes students need to hear provocateurs like Derbyshire in order to formulate their own thoughts and challenges. “What is hate speech to begin with,” he asks. “Itʼs what people don t like to hear. Trump has the support of a considerable portion of the American electorate. With someone like him running for president, speaking on national television every day, saying controversial things about the most important issues of our time, it is imperative that we confront offensive views and afford college students the opportunity to learn how to engage constructively with people they vehemently disagree with. Shielding students from microaggressions does not improve their ability to argue effectively; it coddles them. At a time like this, uncomfortable learning is vital.“
     

    Replies: @SunBakedSuburb, @Anonymous, @Rob

    So, the royal We or a gaggle of ancient New Left ladies?

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    @SunBakedSuburb

    "So, the royal We or a gaggle of ancient New Left ladies?"

    I'll borrow a line here--Doubling down on your obtuseness is not a good look. There was a plethora of i-Steve material in what I wrote. Go back, re-read, and NOTICE.

  94. @Clifford Brown
    @Matthew Kelly

    Imagine dressing like this. Imagine being a Billionaire and dressing like this. We are ruled by the decadent and the weak.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FRf9UxsM-NE

    Replies: @njguy73, @Grumpy, @Kyle

    And their hair cuts. My god.

  95. Steve,
    Maybe it’s because I’m outside the 48, but when I google “Steve Sailer,” your blog is the third hit after your Twitter and Wikipedia entry.

    I also never noticed any shadowbanning of Unz Review, despite Ron’s claim.

    Also, my employer’s content filter still doesn’t disallow Unz Review, although you cannot access AmRen.

  96. @Kylie
    @Rob McX

    "He wasn’t related to Oral Roberts, by any chance? That’s about the worst choice of name I’ve ever come across. It’s just not right for a preacher. He named his son Oral too."

    Lol! No. Speaking about bad names, what about the mayor of Atlanta? Keisha Lance Bottoms.

    Replies: @Lot, @Rob McX, @Kyle, @Jim Bob Lassiter, @Stan d Mute

    Actually, it’s one field of endeavour where blacks don’t need affirmative action, so they can’t be allowed to compete in the contest – otherwise this guy would wind hands down.

  97. @Corvinus
    "Google has memoryholed my blog as well. Try Googling: Steve Sailer"

    We did. It comes up on the first page.

    "Similarly, Google has disappeared..."

    No. Tucker's sites also comes up on the first page.

    Trying to one up your boy Trump with the gaslighting quotient? You know, he was widely panned for his interview with Fox News and Chris Wallace on Sunday. Acing a cognitive test, downplaying Covid-19**, being coy about whether he would accept the election results if he lost.

    https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1285520211593105413

    **Speaking of memory holing

    https://www.unz.com/isteve/arguably-wrong-ballparks-3-different-strageties

    https://www.unz.com/isteve/coronavirus-open-thread/

    Replies: @res, @Ben Kurtz, @Michael S, @Matthew Kelly, @SunBakedSuburb, @Anonymous, @Every court has its jester, @MEH 0910, @anon, @VinnyVette

    And we’re glad you offer regular entertainment on this blog.

    In other news, Trump’s unfitness for office and every other flaw he has have been beaten to death by every major media outlet, so there’s nothing more to add here. Noticing anything else is rare and that’s what makes Sailer so useful.

    Stuff disappearing from Google search results could be caused by anything, from a glitch in the code to someone messing with the code in real time as a prank to a polemical group of Google employees deliberately testing the waters. There’s no transparency when it comes to coding so we can never know. However, the fact that noone aligned with the political left has ever complained about being suppressed online should tell you something.

  98. @syonredux

    Reading the latest copy of the New Yorker magazine, published exactly a week ago, I came across this sentence in a piece by Jill Lepore:

     


    One study suggests that two-thirds of Americans between the ages of fifteen and thirty-four who were treated in emergency rooms suffered from injuries inflicted by police and security guards, about as many people as the number of pedestrians injured by motor vehicles.
    - JILL LEPORE, NEW YORKER
     

    This sentence jumped out to me. How could it possibly be true that ‘two-thirds’ of all Americans aged 15-34 visiting emergency rooms had been injured by police or security guards, given the very many other reasons why people might present for emergency treatment? In the online version, there is no hyperlink to the research (although the article does contain hyperlinks), and the study’s authors are not named.
     

    Jill Lepore could hardly be more eminent. She is a professor of American history at Harvard, the recipient of a long list of awards, and a longstanding staff writer at the New Yorker, as well as a contributor at many other well regarded publications.

     


    I sought out the study she was referring to, and found it: a 2016 paper, whose lead author, Justin Feldman, was a doctoral student at Harvard at the time. Soon after publication, the findings were described in a Harvard press release, and also reported on by The Guardian.
     

    And it turns out I was right — the ‘two-thirds’ claim is not true. Not even close.

     


    I did my best to work out a rough estimate of the true proportion of 15-34 year olds visiting the ER who had suffered legal intervention injuries, and arrived at a figure of 0.2% (you can follow my working in this thread). So I believe Lepore’s claim to be off by a factor of several hundred.

     


    Why does this one sentence matter? Well, firstly, it misinforms readers, several of whom (based on my Twitter search for the article’s URL) also alighted on this claim, but unlike me took it on trust. Secondly, and perhaps more importantly, it tells us something about the political climate in a publication like the New Yorker, which was once famous for its rigorous fact checking.
     

    We know that political bias warps cognition, sometimes catastrophically, and this is, I think, an example of that in action. Lepore read Feldman’s research and she misunderstood part of it, despite being an exceptionally intelligent person. Like many other Left-leaning Democrats, she is convinced that police brutality is a huge, under-acknowledged problem in the United States, and she therefore jumped to the conclusion that this wildly inflated ‘two-thirds’ figure was plausible.
     

    The staff at the New Yorker who read her piece also, we must assume, considered it to be plausible. The sentence was printed and, as of the time of writing, has not been corrected. There has been no uproar on social media. I reached out to both the New Yorker and Feldman for comment, and have not received replies.

     

    https://unherd.com/thepost/an-untrue-claim-in-the-new-yorker-speaks-volumes/

    Replies: @peterike, @njguy73, @ben tillman, @Kylie, @Hippopotamusdrome

    who were treated in emergency rooms suffered from injuries inflicted by police and security guards

    Quibbling over numbers is the wrong question to ask.

    The proper question is so, how many inflicted injuries were the result of 100.00% lawful, legal actions that any non-political jury would instantly acquit?

    If there is a remainer, where the law was technically broken, how many are more deserving of the Darwin award than our sympathy?

    Police inflicted injuries will go down when people stop commiting crimes and resisting arrest.

  99. @Prof. Woland
    I noticed something similar about an hour ago trying to find Steve's blog. Google isteve or isteve unz and nothing comes up. same for unz review. It worked at unz.com. This time it was easier to find it.

    Yes, they are indeed coming for us.

    Replies: @Known Fact, @Chrisnonymous

    Impossible. What about the Lord Voldemort Effect Shield?

  100. @L. Cochner
    Is this ploy by Steve to increase searches for his name?

    I googled 'Steve Sailer' and your sites were the 3 top hits.

    Replies: @Hippopotamusdrome

    steve s

    Autocompletes and the 4th portrait is Steve. See why they need to start thinking about some cancelling now?

  101. @Jack D
    @The Wild Geese Howard


    Yandex in Russia also offers a search engine.
     
    Who could have imagined 50 years ago that if you wanted politically unbiased information you could no longer trust American sources and would have to get it from Russia.

    If you search for Steve Sailer on Yandex, this site comes up as the #2 link after his Twitter. On google, unz is at the moment #5.

    I have been using the Yandex Android browser on my tablet because (unlike Chrome for Android) it will run Chrome desktop extensions. (Don't ask me why Google won't allow extensions to run under Chrome for Android since it is technically feasible). Specifically I wanted to run the "Bypass Paywalls" extension which allows you to view most soft paywalled newspaper sites without a subscription (WSJ, Washington Post, etc.) .

    Replies: @J.Ross, @Johann Ricke, @The Wild Geese Howard, @Clyde

    I have been using the Yandex Android browser on my tablet because (unlike Chrome for Android) it will run Chrome desktop extensions. (Don’t ask me why Google won’t allow extensions to run under Chrome for Android since it is technically feasible). Specifically I wanted to run the “Bypass Paywalls” extension which allows you to view most soft paywalled newspaper sites without a subscription (WSJ, Washington Post, etc.) .

    This is fine, as long as you have no information that might be interesting to the KGB FSB:

    Russia’s largest search engine, Yandex, has confirmed that it passed confidential data to the country’s state security service, FSB.

    Yandex’s online payment service gave the FSB personal information about users who donated money to an anti-corruption website launched by the Russian blogger Alexey Navalny.

    The disclosure follows a warning by Yandex about the legal and political risks associated with investing in Russia, ahead of its planned listing in New York.

    Yandex plans to raise up to $1bn (£600m) through a listing on Nasdaq.

    In its prospectus, issued to the US Securities and Exchange Commission last week, the company warned that businesses in Russia “may be subject to aggressive application of contradictory or ambiguous laws or regulations, or to politically-motivated actions”.

    The Russian legal system is characterised in the document by:

    “inconsistencies between and among laws and regulations”
    “selective enforcement of laws or regulations, sometimes in ways that have been perceived as being motivated by political or financial considerations”
    “a perceived lack of judicial and prosecutorial independence from political, social and commercial forces”

    The company also warned that the degree of uncertainty will grow as the 2012 presidential elections approach.
    Market leader

    Russia is one of the few countries where Google is not the dominant search engine. Yandex holds 65% of the Russian internet search market while Google has 21.8%.

    “Yandex has a very good position in Russia and some of the former Soviet countries, being the most popular search engine”, says analyst Lilit Gevorgyan from IHS Global Insight.

    “However, when you hear news that the FSB forced Yandex to reveal the payments through Yandex.Money, it hits the most painful spot: transparency and state intervention.”

    Some experts say this episode will not affect the company’s IPO plans.

    “All big funds who plan to invest a lot of money in Russia are already aware of these risks,” says Georgy Voronkov, analyst from Investcafe research company.

    Yandex plans to follow in the footsteps of another Russian Internet group, Mail.ru, which at the end of last year raised $912m in London.

    • Replies: @Jack D
    @Johann Ricke

    For those that don't trust Yandex (personally I don't think I have anything that would interest the FSB) there is also the Kiwi Android browser, which likewise runs Chrome extensions. I believe Kiwi is the product of an independent developer (a one man show) from France .

    Replies: @Clyde

  102. I went to several blogs and the twitter accounts of conservative and/or pro-Trump/anti-prog accounts this morning and they were ALL misssing.

    Hours later, they were back.

    • Agree: Je Suis Omar Mateen
  103. The blog of Kevin Rhodes in MN, healthy-skeptic, stopped working in google on an android phone but not on a desktop. hm.

    duckduckgo and Brave are your friends.

  104. @njguy73
    @Clifford Brown

    That's not decadence, that's strategy. It's the billionaire telegraphing "I'm just a regular guy" so the stupid masses will trust him while he buys up their dumb asses.

    Replies: @Change that Matters, @Clifford Brown, @Reg Cæsar

    More thought has gone into those two outfits than for the average starlet’s red carpet ensemble.

    For instance:

    1. Larry Page is wearing a “Google Yellow” T-shirt; Sergey Brin’s is “Google Blue”.

    2. Page has a “Google Yellow” microphone windsock; Brin’s is “Google Blue”.

    3. Page stands to our left, Brin to our right (i.e., in the correct color order for the Google logo – the second o is yellow, the second g is blue). Together they spell OG. Make of that what you will.

    There’s no decadence on show here; just the same subliminal messaging you’ll find at any corporate event.

    • Replies: @Clifford Brown
    @Change that Matters

    Put down the bong.

  105. @Stan d Mute
    “Ernest”? Yikes. Maybe they should memory hole you Steve. But I just checked and you’re still there. For the moment anyway..

    Now about that middle name I just discovered by googling you...

    Replies: @Kylie, @the one they call Desanex, @MEH 0910, @Mr Mox

    That was Steve’s late father’s first name.

    https://www.unz.com/isteve/ernie-sailer-1917-2012/

  106. @Kylie
    @Rob McX

    "He wasn’t related to Oral Roberts, by any chance? That’s about the worst choice of name I’ve ever come across. It’s just not right for a preacher. He named his son Oral too."

    Lol! No. Speaking about bad names, what about the mayor of Atlanta? Keisha Lance Bottoms.

    Replies: @Lot, @Rob McX, @Kyle, @Jim Bob Lassiter, @Stan d Mute

    Keisha lance bottoms isn’t a bad name. She’s pretty. I wouldn’t mind…, you can see where I’m going with this.

    • LOL: YetAnotherAnon
  107. I think there have been brief instances of this before. Might not be a test but some “premature anti-fascist” jumping the gun and activating an existing bit of censorship code without authorization before being caught.
    That it happened is not of as much interest as the speed with which the usual malevolent sock puppets jumped on this post and literally expected you to believe it never happened at all.
    Comrade Yezhov never existed!
    https://www.history.com/news/josef-stalin-great-purge-photo-retouching
    Who are you going to believe, me or your lying eyes!

    • Replies: @J.Ross
    @Alfa158

    This, it's not conspiracy versus rogue employee, it's both. You have both the overall programmatic progressivism (which has to recognize certain limits) plus the hotter-headed individuals who might try something on their own.

  108. @Corvinus
    "Google has memoryholed my blog as well. Try Googling: Steve Sailer"

    We did. It comes up on the first page.

    "Similarly, Google has disappeared..."

    No. Tucker's sites also comes up on the first page.

    Trying to one up your boy Trump with the gaslighting quotient? You know, he was widely panned for his interview with Fox News and Chris Wallace on Sunday. Acing a cognitive test, downplaying Covid-19**, being coy about whether he would accept the election results if he lost.

    https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1285520211593105413

    **Speaking of memory holing

    https://www.unz.com/isteve/arguably-wrong-ballparks-3-different-strageties

    https://www.unz.com/isteve/coronavirus-open-thread/

    Replies: @res, @Ben Kurtz, @Michael S, @Matthew Kelly, @SunBakedSuburb, @Anonymous, @Every court has its jester, @MEH 0910, @anon, @VinnyVette

    Trying to one up your boy Trump with the gaslighting quotient?

    I saw with my own eyes that Unz Review itself didn’t show up in a Google search yesterday.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    @MEH 0910

    "I saw with my own eyes that Unz Review itself didn’t show up in a Google search yesterday."

    Contact -->

    https://support.google.com/websearch/answer/6223687?co=GENIE.Platform%3DAndroid&hl=en

    https://giphy.com/explore/the-more-you-know

    Speaking of being memory holed...

    https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/1285412935204876288

    Replies: @BenKenobi

  109. Anonymous[180] • Disclaimer says:

    All those ‘true conservatives’ into ‘muh constitution’ who defend corporate censorship on grounds that private entities can do as they want, why are they not outraged by the STATE’s clampdown on BDS? That’s about the government enforcing censorship of views. Also, would these ‘true conservatives’ be okay with major companies banning Zionists on account of Israel being a supremacist state built on a hateful ideology? I doubt it. Just shameless shills who will say and do anything for 30 pieces of silver.

    Also, two issues are related that simply cannot be overlooked.

    1. Companies like Google, Facebook, and Twitter are monopolies…

    … and furthermore…

    2. … they gained Monopoly Status ONLY BECAUSE they promised neutrality to users. If, at the very outset, they had laid out their future Terms of Service favoring Zionists & the ‘left’ over Arabs & the ‘right’, MANY PEOPLE would never have used their services or signed up to join. They would have joined a different platform. So, for those companies to gain monopoly status by promising neutrality and then use their monopoly power for partisan and tribal purposes is utterly unethical and should be illegal.

    As for financial services connected to banks, how are they able to discriminate on the basis of creed when they got bail out money from ALL AMERICANS? All Americans are forced to pay taxes to bail out banks, but banks and financial institutions can deny service to SOME Americans?

    Utterly ludicrous. But where are the lawyers making these cases?

  110. @njguy73
    @Clifford Brown

    That's not decadence, that's strategy. It's the billionaire telegraphing "I'm just a regular guy" so the stupid masses will trust him while he buys up their dumb asses.

    Replies: @Change that Matters, @Clifford Brown, @Reg Cæsar

    Regular guys dress like that? Like Sergey in that clip?

    Sundar Pichai in his black hoodie is dressed like a normal guy. Who is going for a jog or picking up doughnuts on a Saturday. This is not the way a CEO should dress. I have no doubt that Sundar thinks this is all weird and he just does it to fit in. Sundar is the only normal person at the top of Google.

    Sergey fried his brain.

    • Agree: PiltdownMan
  111. Anonymous[100] • Disclaimer says:
    @Corvinus
    @SunBakedSuburb

    "The royal “We”?

    "We" as in people who NOTICE. Mr. Sailer is feigning outrage and being hypocritical in his own right about "memory holing", but I would not expect you to admit it. That is the major point here.

    Now, as far as free speech is concerned, recall the Supreme Court has ruled in several cases that if a private company/organization creates a public forum for speech, the fact that it is a private company/organization allows its immunity from the First and Fourteenth Amendments (Hudgens v. NLRB, Lloyd Corp. v. Tanner, and Central Hardware Co. v. NLRB). Perhaps the Big Bear's lawsuit can make it to the Supreme Court and serve as the impetus for change, considering how today's "cancel culture" is akin to the censorship of the 1950's. And maybe what is needed is a corporate personhood amendment that can reign in social media companies. Then again, the EU may actually set the standards for other nations to follow.

    https://www.irishtimes.com/news/world/europe/why-facebook-wants-the-eu-to-decide-the-limits-of-free-speech-1.4270126


    Different approaches taken by two of the biggest social media giants in recent days have highlighted the high stakes of managing problematic online content. As protests against the killing of black people by police swept the United States, president Donald Trump wrote on Twitter and Facebook “Any difficulty and we will assume control but, when the looting starts, the shooting starts”.
    In a first in its dealings with the US president, Twitter obscured the post with a warning label, saying it violated its rules against glorifying violence.

    But Facebook took a different approach, leaving the president’s post as it was. Chief executive Mark Zuckerberg said that while he found the post “deeply offensive”, it did not violate his company’s policies.

    Both companies have faced consequences.

    Twitter has been the focus of a backlash from Trump, who threatened to “strongly regulate” social media companies or “close them down”. For Facebook, the heat came from employees who openly criticised the company’s inaction. Two of them publicly quit.

    What kind of posts should not be allowed on social media, who should make those decisions, and how, is a regulatory puzzle. And Zuckerberg has asked the European Commission to solve it. In a public discussion with internal market commissioner Thierry Breton last month, the Facebook boss asked the commission to set rules for social media companies to follow. “Basically, the platforms shouldn’t be left to govern themselves,” Zuckerberg said. Europe had the opportunity to set a standard for the world, he argued, and should do so before China did."

    It might seem a strange position for Zuckerberg to take, but it makes sense.

    Such platforms are too big and too famous to host harmful speech without damage to their reputations. If there are to be rules, it’s easier for Facebook to follow one set of them for all of the EU rather than differing laws in each country. And it’s easier if the company does not have to do the expensive and difficult work of solving the riddle itself.

    But as your soy boy Alt Right leader Vox Day pronounced, focus on building your own platforms to avoid the machinations and "convergence" of Google, Twitter, and Facebook.
     

    Finally, per usual, "cancel culture" and "political correctness" needs context. Try to follow along.

    Dennis Miller and Bill Maher --> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ipwMa5uT5es

    https://jacobinmag.com/2020/07/cancel-culture-harpers-letter-free-speech


    Conservatives who historically tended to oppose free speech and held the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) as chief in its pantheon of villains have suddenly rebranded themselves as free expression’s greatest defenders. But while they were happy to defend alt-right provocateur Milo Yiannopoulos’s right to express xenophobic and misogynist comments, when he began talking about the messy complications of the age of consent among gay men, they threw him under the bus.

    Donald Trump has worked to clamp down on trade unions “salting” workplaces, that is, the century-old practice of getting a trade-union-friendly person hired at a workplace that is targeted for unionization. And perhaps most notoriously, the same man who at Mount Rushmore denounced a “far-left fascist [sic] cultural revolution,” calling for “free and open debate” instead, only weeks before used the National Guard to teargas and clear nonviolent protesters from the streets of Washington for the sake of a cheap photo-op.

    One might expect the liberal-left to be among the strongest defenders of free speech at work, and of the right of workers to say what they wish, but too many have enthusiastically called upon employers to fire workers for alleged reactionary speech outside of the workplace, in effect cheering on at-will termination of employment, and embraced the multibillion-dollar human resources department–organized and employer-supervised “sensitivity training” industry, imposing top-down workshops, where workers are petrified they might say the wrong thing.

     

    https://www.harpersbazaar.com/uk/culture/a33296561/cancel-culture-a-force-for-good-or-a-threat-to-free-speech

    The idea of pushing someone out - because they have said or done something perceived to be offensive - leaves no room for growth or learning. Matt Haig describes cancel culture as “anti-progress because it is anti-change”. “Cancelling people pushes them away and makes them more likely to find spaces where bad views are the norm,” he says. “Obviously, if someone has been convicted of, say, violence or sexual assault then they need to be punished, but cancel culture isn’t that. Cancel culture, as I see it, involves the shutting down of different perspectives and treating people like mere disposable artefacts in the cultural economy.”

    ...

    The problem with cancel culture is that it has become too broad, and near meaningless. R Kelly was cancelled over decades of sexual-assault allegations, yet so too was Jodie Comer for dating a Republican. There is no proportion. It is used in so many different contexts, both heavy and light, that it oversimplifies, and loses its weight because it allows those who have engaged in dangerous and/or harmful rhetoric and behaviour to ride on the backlash.

    ...

    In the eyes of cancel culture, people are reduced to good or bad with no room for anything in-between. “The process is like air-brushing someone or something out,” says Beresford, “It doesn’t allow for the possibility that two sides could ever agree, or learn from each other, or could persuade each other of their arguments – or even agree to disagree.”
     

    THE BATTLE AGAINST ‘HATE SPEECH’ ON COLLEGE CAMPUSES GIVES RISE TO A GENERATION THAT HATES SPEECH--NINA BURLEIGH, NEWSWEEK, 5/26/16

    Until it was squashed by administrative decree, Williams College sophomore Zachary Wood headed up an on-campus lecture series called Uncomfortable Learning. Wood, an African-American who grew up in one of the poorer neighborhoods in Washington, D.C., is a self-described liberal, devoted to learning and books. He liked inviting controversial speakers, usually from the political right, to challenge young progressives cloistered in a collegiate utopia at one of the nationʻs great small liberal arts institutions. Last year, though, Wood encountered the limits of free speech at Williams. First, he invited Suzanne Venker, an anti-feminist author and lecturer. After a campus and social media outcry, Woodʻs fellow Uncomfortable Learning leaders disinvited her and then, to avoid further shaming on social media, resigned from the organization.

    Wood then formed a club of one and invited an even more confrontational speaker, British-American writer John Derbyshire. After suggesting that blacks are more antisocial than whites, he wrote that a small percentage is ferociously hostile to whites and will go to great lengths to inconvenience or harm us, while around half will go along [with violence] passively if the five percent take leadership in some event. An hour after Wood advertised Derbyshireʻs speech with a Facebook post, he was swarmed. On Facebook, someone wrote that Wood deserved the oil and whip, a reference to a punishment for slaves. Others accused him of providing a space on campus for hate speech,and began debating how to file a complaint against him. When Wood replied to one critic, “So you would never bring a speaker on the far right, like Venker and Derbyshire? I value the work I do with UL“, someone retorted,“Iʼd rather sell crack first.“

    A few days passed, the outrage kept building, and the university president disinvited Derbyshire. Wood believes students need to hear provocateurs like Derbyshire in order to formulate their own thoughts and challenges. “What is hate speech to begin with,” he asks. “Itʼs what people don t like to hear. Trump has the support of a considerable portion of the American electorate. With someone like him running for president, speaking on national television every day, saying controversial things about the most important issues of our time, it is imperative that we confront offensive views and afford college students the opportunity to learn how to engage constructively with people they vehemently disagree with. Shielding students from microaggressions does not improve their ability to argue effectively; it coddles them. At a time like this, uncomfortable learning is vital.“
     

    Replies: @SunBakedSuburb, @Anonymous, @Rob

    Jesus, you must be a blast to be with…

  112. • Replies: @YetAnotherAnon
    @MEH 0910


    Have other blacklisted conservative sites been returned? Does Google have an explanation for what they did?
     
    I think you're seeing things, my dear chap. Your sites didn't disappear. Maybe you're working too hard.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaslight_(1940_film)
  113. @Kylie
    @Rob McX

    "He wasn’t related to Oral Roberts, by any chance? That’s about the worst choice of name I’ve ever come across. It’s just not right for a preacher. He named his son Oral too."

    Lol! No. Speaking about bad names, what about the mayor of Atlanta? Keisha Lance Bottoms.

    Replies: @Lot, @Rob McX, @Kyle, @Jim Bob Lassiter, @Stan d Mute

    At least Keisha has an excuse. She’s black. This Oral business defies explanation.

    • LOL: Kylie
  114. @MEH 0910
    @Corvinus


    Trying to one up your boy Trump with the gaslighting quotient?
     
    I saw with my own eyes that Unz Review itself didn't show up in a Google search yesterday.

    Replies: @Corvinus

    “I saw with my own eyes that Unz Review itself didn’t show up in a Google search yesterday.”

    Contact –>

    https://support.google.com/websearch/answer/6223687?co=GENIE.Platform%3DAndroid&hl=en

    https://giphy.com/explore/the-more-you-know

    Speaking of being memory holed…

    • Replies: @BenKenobi
    @Corvinus


    More than 430 babies tested positive for cor*onavirus
     
    Okay but what color were they?
  115. @Jack D
    @The Wild Geese Howard


    Yandex in Russia also offers a search engine.
     
    Who could have imagined 50 years ago that if you wanted politically unbiased information you could no longer trust American sources and would have to get it from Russia.

    If you search for Steve Sailer on Yandex, this site comes up as the #2 link after his Twitter. On google, unz is at the moment #5.

    I have been using the Yandex Android browser on my tablet because (unlike Chrome for Android) it will run Chrome desktop extensions. (Don't ask me why Google won't allow extensions to run under Chrome for Android since it is technically feasible). Specifically I wanted to run the "Bypass Paywalls" extension which allows you to view most soft paywalled newspaper sites without a subscription (WSJ, Washington Post, etc.) .

    Replies: @J.Ross, @Johann Ricke, @The Wild Geese Howard, @Clyde

    Chrome for Android sounds like my employer’s IT department, which blocks me from installing ad-block extensions on the browsers on my work PC.

    You would think they’d want employees to be able to block ads and conserve their precious bandwidth.

    You’d be wrong.

    Agree about having to get news from Russia.

    What a time to be alive.

    • Replies: @Lot
    @The Wild Geese Howard

    “ You would think they’d want employees to be able to block ads and conserve their precious bandwidth.”

    Ads are a major source of malware spread.

    Further, adblockers tend to blacklist malware domains, so they can stop someone who clicks an email link to a virus. This isn’t great protection as they rotate domains quickly, but if the email is from 10+ days ago it might. They may also just be sloppy and use the blacklisted domain they already have ready access to.

  116. I searched for you on Duckduckgo and you came up no problem.

    Everybody should avoid google.

  117. @El Dato
    Ah yes, the Mrs. Pritchet of the Internet is active again, dreaming her dream.

    Philip K. Dick would have loved this epoch.

    From "Eye in the Sky".



    In all possible universes, Monday was the same. At eight-thirty A.M., Hamilton was seated on the Southern Pacific commuters' train, a San Francisco Chronicle spread out on his lap, on his way up the coast to the Electronics Development Agency. Assuming, of course, that it existed. As yet, he couldn't tell.

    Around him, listless white-collar workers smoked and read the comics and discussed sports. Hunched over in his seat, Hamilton moodily considered them. Did they know they were distorted figments of somebody's fantasy world? Apparently not. Placidly, they went about their Monday routine, unaware that every aspect of their existence was being manipulated by an invisible presence.

    It wasn't hard to guess the identity of that presence.

    Probably, seven of the eight members of the group had figured it out by now. Even his wife. At breakfast, Marsha had faced him solemnly and said, "Mrs. Pritchet I thought about it all night. I'm positive."

    "Why are you positive?" he had asked acidly.

    "Because," Marsha answered, with absolute conviction, "she's the only one who would believe this sort of thing." She ran her hands over her flat body. "It's exactly the sort of silly, Victorian nonsense she'd put over on us."

    If there was any doubt in his mind, it was resolved by a sight glimpsed as the train sped out of Belmont. Standing obediently in front of a small rural shack was a horse attached to a cart full of scrap iron: rusty sections of abandoned autos. The horse was wearing trousers.

    "South San Francisco," the conductor brayed, appearing at the end of the swaying coach. Pocketing his paper, Hamilton joined the meager crowd of businessmen moving toward the exit. A moment later he was striding gloomily toward the sparkling white buildings that were the Electronics Development Agency. At least the company existed . . . that was a helpful start. Crossing his fingers, he prayed fervently that his job was a part of this world.

    Doctor Guy Tillingford met him in his outer office. "Bright and early, I see," he glowed, shaking hands. "Off to a good start."

    Relaxing considerably, Hamilton began removing his coat. EDA existed, and he still had a job. Tillingford, in this distorted realm, had hired him; that much carried over. One major problem was erased from his note pad of things to worry about.

    "Darn decent of you to let me have a day off," Hamilton said warily, as Tillingford led him down the hall to the labs. "I appreciated it."

    "How did you make out?" Tillingford inquired.

    That was a stopper. In Silvester's world, Tillingford had sent him to consult the Prophet of the Second Bab. The chances were slight that this also carried over . . . in fact, it was out of the question. Stalling, Hamilton said, "Not bad, considering. Of course, it's a little out of my line."

    "Any difficulty in finding the place?"

    "None at all." Sweating, Hamilton wondered just what he had done, in this world. "It was.." he began. "It was darn nice of you. The first darn day, like that."

    "Think nothing of it. Just tell me one thing." At the lab doorway, Tillingford halted briefly. "Who won?"

    "W-won?"

    "Did your entry take the prize?" Grinning, Tillingford slapped him warmly on the back. "By golly, I'll bet it did. I can tell by the expression on your face."

    The portly Personnel Director came striding along the hall, a thick briefcase under his arm. "How'd he do?" he demanded, with a moist chuckle. Knowingly, he tapped Hamilton on the arm. "Got a little something to show us? A ribbon, maybe?"

    "He's holding back," Tillingford confided. "Ernie, let's give it a write-up in the office bulletin; wouldn't the staff be interested?"

    "You're darn right," the Personnel Director agreed. "I'll make a note of that." To Hamilton he said, "What did you tell us your cat's name is?"

    "What?" Hamilton faltered.

    "Friday, when we were talking about it. Darned if I can remember. I want to get the spelling right for the office bulletin."

    In this universe, Hamilton had been given a day off -- his first working day at the new job -- to enter Ninny Numbcat in a pet show. Inwardly, he groaned. Mrs. Pritchet's world, in some ways, was going to be more of a trial than Arthur Silvester's.

    ....

    From a worktable, Doctor Tillingford picked up a copy of the Journal of Applied Sciences for November, 1959. There's an article in here that's circulating among our staff. It may interest you, although it's somewhat old stuff, these days. An analysis of the writings of one of the really significant men of our century, Sigmund Freud."

    "Fine," Hamilton said tonelessly. He was prepared for anything.

    "As you realize, Sigmund Freud developed the psychoanalytic concept of sex as a sublimation of the artistic drive. He showed how the basic, fundamental human urge toward artistic creativity, if given no valid means of expression, is transformed and altered into its surrogate form: sexual activity."

    "Is that right?" Hamilton murmured, resigned.

    "Freud showed that in the healthy, uninhibited human, there is no sexual drive and no curiosity or interest in sexuality. Contrary to traditional thought, sex is a wholly artificial preoccupation. When a man or woman is given a chance for decent, normal, artistic activity -- painting, writing, music -- the so-called sexual drive withers away. Sexual activity is the covert, hidden form under which the artistic talent operates when mechanistic society subjects the individual to unnatural inhibition."

    "Sure," Hamilton said. I learned that in high school. Or something like it"

    "Fortunately," Tillingford continued, "the initial resistance to Freud's monumental discovery has been overcome. Naturally, he met terrific opposition. But, happily, that's all dying out. Nowadays you rarely find an educated person speaking of sex and sexuality. I use the terms merely in their clinical sense, to describe an abnormal clinical condition."

    Hopefully, Hamilton asked, "You say there's some remnant of traditional thinking among the lower classes?"

    "Well," Tillingford conceded, "it will take time to reach everybody." He brightened; enthusiasm returned. "And that's our job, my boy. That's the function of the electronics craft."

    "Craft," Hamilton muttered.

     

    Replies: @JimB

    If you regularly get news from the Trump campaign and if you delete a couple of posts without reading them, Google mail helpfully asks you if you want to block the Trump campaign website.

  118. @Alfa158
    I think there have been brief instances of this before. Might not be a test but some “premature anti-fascist” jumping the gun and activating an existing bit of censorship code without authorization before being caught.
    That it happened is not of as much interest as the speed with which the usual malevolent sock puppets jumped on this post and literally expected you to believe it never happened at all.
    Comrade Yezhov never existed!
    https://www.history.com/news/josef-stalin-great-purge-photo-retouching
    Who are you going to believe, me or your lying eyes!

    Replies: @J.Ross

    This, it’s not conspiracy versus rogue employee, it’s both. You have both the overall programmatic progressivism (which has to recognize certain limits) plus the hotter-headed individuals who might try something on their own.

  119. @Achmed E. Newman
    @prime noticer

    I agree. I start with duckduckgo, but if it fails me, I go to bing, and if it does I go to google (once in a few weeks or so). Bing indeed seems the best for image searches.

    BTW, a search for "peak stupidity" comes up with the right site every time, but it helps that I bang the livin' out of google on this (using google, just due to it being the most popular search engine for OTHERS.)

    You guys give it a shot. You'll see what I mean.

    Replies: @Mike Tre

    Bing had a message about standing with BLM on their home page for like 2 weeks. No more.

  120. It’s almost as if there’s an election coming up and Google is going for maximum election interference.

    I’m assuming they (Google) fear that Biden will actually flop harder than Hillary in 2016. Does anyone want to make any side bets on a 2020 Trump landslide?

    http://voxday.blogspot.com/2020/07/betting-on-trumpslide.html

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    @Kronos

    Still early in the game. Lots can happen from now to November.

    At the beginning of the year I was sure Trump would win, after all the economy was doing well, and its rare for incumbents to lose absent major incompetence or misfortune.

    Then corona hit and the economy went to shit. I was sure Trump would lose.

    Now the Democrats have lost their minds and are methodically destroying the country. It's tempting to now assume Trump will win, but really, who knows what's going to happen next?

  121. google employees like to put things in their holes.

  122. Steve, be grateful your platform is not YouTube! Any thoughts on the great purge going on there?

    • Replies: @Kronos
    @BB753

    They took down Stefan Molyneux the damn Youtube b@stards.

    Replies: @BB753

  123. @Lot
    “Tucker Carlson” search on DuckDuckGo: first two results are his personal homepage and his fox page.

    “Rachel Maddow” on Google: First two results are her personal page and MSNBC page.

    “Tucker Carlson” on Google:

    Result 1 is biased wiki page
    2 is a “Vultue.com” accusation of “sexual misconduct”
    3 is CNN saying his “writer quits after secretly posting racist...”

    His Fox page doesn’t come until 7, and his personal homepage isn’t in the first 30 results at all.

    Bigger question for some of you: why haven’t you switched yet to Brave Browser and DuckDuckGo?

    Replies: @Chrisnonymous, @PiltdownMan

    What is the advantage of Brave over Vivaldi? (I’m not interested in getting involved in cryptocurrency.)

    • Replies: @Lot
    @Chrisnonymous

    1. Brave has adblock built in.

    2. Brave’s founder is an iSteve commenter.

    3. You can turn the crypto thing off if it isn’t already by default. It doesn’t mine, as in waste a lot of electricity, it gives you “micropayments” for the ads you opt into.

  124. OT: Here’s a post on a tenured engineering professor’s experience with the DIE nazis at his state school: https://spectator.org/diversity-inclusion-enforcement-professors-account-title-ix-investigation-odi-university/

    • Thanks: Mr McKenna
  125. They are all worried that Trump will win again.

    • Replies: @Kronos
    @Lagertha

    Does anyone have a list from after the 2016 election on which Democratic-orientated pollsters thought it would be a very close election or thought Trump would actually win?

    Replies: @Lagertha

  126. • Replies: @Mr McKenna
    @MEH 0910

    It appears to have been about 90% right and alt-right sites delisted, with about 5% fringe-left and plain old fringe added in for plausible deniability.

    https://www.rt.com/news/495445-google-hides-conservative-alt-news/

    Next time, guaranteed, they will be more subtle.

  127. @Rob McX
    @YetAnotherAnon

    I'd bet these "knife awareness courses" are compulsory as an alternative to prison for potentially homicidal "young offenders" who've been convicted of some knife-related crime. I suppose the authorities were foolish enough not to have a metal detector at each entrance.

    Replies: @Coemgen

    I suppose the authorities were foolish enough not to have a metal detector at each entrance.

    Better yet, just have someone at the door who can profile those who wish to enter. If someone looks like an undesirable; send him packing.

    Remember when profiling was the amazing technique that FBI agents used to identify criminals? What happened to that?

  128. @Art Deco
    I had to use Bing yesterday to locate this site.

    Replies: @Achmed E. Newman

    See, now I don’t get that. You and another commenter (maybe on the another post from today) bring up using a search engine to get to this site. You and the other commenter both are on here a lot. Why would you need the search engine rather than simply typing in 7 characters, and probably only one or two if you’ve used the browser on that device before recently (text completion)?

    How hard is it to type in unz.com? I ask you this, Art, because I do see loads of people do this to get to websites they go to all the time. I know these simple URLs, unz, vdare, peakstupidity, zerohedge, instapundit, etc, by heart, like I know the phone numbers of people, family or friends, who’ve had the same mobile or land lines for a long time.

    • Replies: @ScarletNumber
    @Achmed E. Newman

    As much as I hate to agree with you, you are correct. Why would you need a search engine to find a website you regularly visit? Especially one with three letters. Hell this is one of the eight suggested favorites Chrome suggests, so I don't even have to type anything to get here.

    Art Deco, you are a dope.

  129. Drudge Report was included in that trial-purge too. I guess Google hasn’t gotten the memo that DR is now on Team Biden.

  130. @Change that Matters
    @njguy73

    More thought has gone into those two outfits than for the average starlet's red carpet ensemble.

    For instance:

    1. Larry Page is wearing a "Google Yellow" T-shirt; Sergey Brin's is "Google Blue".

    2. Page has a "Google Yellow" microphone windsock; Brin's is "Google Blue".

    3. Page stands to our left, Brin to our right (i.e., in the correct color order for the Google logo - the second o is yellow, the second g is blue). Together they spell OG. Make of that what you will.

    There's no decadence on show here; just the same subliminal messaging you'll find at any corporate event.

    Replies: @Clifford Brown

    Put down the bong.

  131. @BB753
    Steve, be grateful your platform is not YouTube! Any thoughts on the great purge going on there?

    Replies: @Kronos

    They took down Stefan Molyneux the damn Youtube b@stards.

    • Replies: @BB753
    @Kronos

    That's just the tip of the iceberg.

    Replies: @BB753

  132. I tried googling you and it worked fine. You came up in the results with twitter, unz, wikipedia, etc. I wouldn’t use google anymore regardless. Google is designed to influence search and drive traffic to some ideas while suppressing others. The only reliable way to get around that is to pay them to rank you with AdWords campaigns. They intentionally killed SEO years ago.

  133. @Kronos
    @BB753

    They took down Stefan Molyneux the damn Youtube b@stards.

    Replies: @BB753

    That’s just the tip of the iceberg.

    • Replies: @BB753
    @BB753

    Google memoryholes iSteve, but iSteve memoryholes some of my comments. I guess the world is unfair.

  134. Looks like everyone is back.

    So this was just a rehearsal for tactical operations of the mostly peaceful cancelers at Google in the Fall.

  135. A trial balloon to see how quickly anyone noticed?

    My guess: A group of lone wolves operating within Google with no specific directive from the top, but still the exodus operandi for Google/Youtube.

  136. @Corvinus
    @MEH 0910

    "I saw with my own eyes that Unz Review itself didn’t show up in a Google search yesterday."

    Contact -->

    https://support.google.com/websearch/answer/6223687?co=GENIE.Platform%3DAndroid&hl=en

    https://giphy.com/explore/the-more-you-know

    Speaking of being memory holed...

    https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/1285412935204876288

    Replies: @BenKenobi

    More than 430 babies tested positive for cor*onavirus

    Okay but what color were they?

  137. All this puts me in mind of the prequels to the attempted coup that led to the Spanish Civil War and ultimately Franco, and Pinochet overthrowing Allende, and Hitler coming to power.

    Everyone knows all about the fierce bad man. What they forget about are the abuses of power on the part of the Left that brought it on.

    • Agree: SimpleSong
    • Replies: @Wielgus
    @Colin Wright

    Pinochet was the classic US shill, also beloved of Margaret Thatcher.
    When Bani Sadr had to flee Iran, a Farsi rhyme went like this in translation - "Bani Sadr is like Pinochet/Under his moustache it says USA".

  138. @Johann Ricke
    @Jack D


    I have been using the Yandex Android browser on my tablet because (unlike Chrome for Android) it will run Chrome desktop extensions. (Don’t ask me why Google won’t allow extensions to run under Chrome for Android since it is technically feasible). Specifically I wanted to run the “Bypass Paywalls” extension which allows you to view most soft paywalled newspaper sites without a subscription (WSJ, Washington Post, etc.) .
     
    This is fine, as long as you have no information that might be interesting to the KGB FSB:

    Russia's largest search engine, Yandex, has confirmed that it passed confidential data to the country's state security service, FSB.

    Yandex's online payment service gave the FSB personal information about users who donated money to an anti-corruption website launched by the Russian blogger Alexey Navalny.

    The disclosure follows a warning by Yandex about the legal and political risks associated with investing in Russia, ahead of its planned listing in New York.

    Yandex plans to raise up to $1bn (£600m) through a listing on Nasdaq.

    In its prospectus, issued to the US Securities and Exchange Commission last week, the company warned that businesses in Russia "may be subject to aggressive application of contradictory or ambiguous laws or regulations, or to politically-motivated actions".

    The Russian legal system is characterised in the document by:

    "inconsistencies between and among laws and regulations"
    "selective enforcement of laws or regulations, sometimes in ways that have been perceived as being motivated by political or financial considerations"
    "a perceived lack of judicial and prosecutorial independence from political, social and commercial forces"

    The company also warned that the degree of uncertainty will grow as the 2012 presidential elections approach.
    Market leader

    Russia is one of the few countries where Google is not the dominant search engine. Yandex holds 65% of the Russian internet search market while Google has 21.8%.

    "Yandex has a very good position in Russia and some of the former Soviet countries, being the most popular search engine", says analyst Lilit Gevorgyan from IHS Global Insight.

    "However, when you hear news that the FSB forced Yandex to reveal the payments through Yandex.Money, it hits the most painful spot: transparency and state intervention."

    Some experts say this episode will not affect the company's IPO plans.

    "All big funds who plan to invest a lot of money in Russia are already aware of these risks," says Georgy Voronkov, analyst from Investcafe research company.

    Yandex plans to follow in the footsteps of another Russian Internet group, Mail.ru, which at the end of last year raised $912m in London.
     

    Replies: @Jack D

    For those that don’t trust Yandex (personally I don’t think I have anything that would interest the FSB) there is also the Kiwi Android browser, which likewise runs Chrome extensions. I believe Kiwi is the product of an independent developer (a one man show) from France .

    • Thanks: Johann Ricke
    • Replies: @Clyde
    @Jack D

    I cannot vouch for their android versions but in Windows you have Brave that runs chrome extensions. Chromium also.

    https://techwiser.com/best-chromium-browsers-for-android/

    Replies: @Jack D

  139. I found your blog fine.

    O/T, there was a shooting in Chicago of a funeral of a shooting victim.

    14 wounded so far.

    #BLS

  140. @res
    I just looked at Google Trends for your name.
    https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?q=steve%20sailer&geo=US

    One odd thing is it is showing a spike to 2x the usual volume and a breakout related query: [email protected]

    Strange stuff. I wonder if it has something to do with the memory holing mechanism.

    In contrast, Ron just seems to have been disappeared. Current interest to 0 and no related queries, plus the only related topic is Wikipedia.
    https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?q=ron%20unz&geo=US

    P.S. I am amazed they memory holed Tucker. That seems too over the top to ignore.

    Replies: @CrunchyButRealistCon

    Compared the search results for ‘Steve Sailer’ on duckduckgo, startpage & yahoo, and all three seem alright. Appears duckduckgo lists your blog description at unz.com as first result while the other two tend to favor wikipedia in rank.

  141. @SunBakedSuburb
    @Corvinus

    So, the royal We or a gaggle of ancient New Left ladies?

    Replies: @Corvinus

    “So, the royal We or a gaggle of ancient New Left ladies?”

    I’ll borrow a line here–Doubling down on your obtuseness is not a good look. There was a plethora of i-Steve material in what I wrote. Go back, re-read, and NOTICE.

  142. @Lagertha
    They are all worried that Trump will win again.

    Replies: @Kronos

    Does anyone have a list from after the 2016 election on which Democratic-orientated pollsters thought it would be a very close election or thought Trump would actually win?

    • Replies: @Lagertha
    @Kronos

    lists do not apply to Change Agents.

  143. One of our regular columnists warned me this morning that we’d been totally “disappeared” from Google results, and that was the case for most of the day. It was only a couple of hours ago I discovered that lots of other “conservative” websites had suffered a similar fate.

    However, Google had actually de-ranked all of our pages in early May, which caused an immediate drop of 15% or more in our regular traffic:

    https://www.unz.com/announcement/record-breaking-traffic-despite-our-purge-from-google-and-facebook/

    Virtually almost none of our pages ever come up in Google searches unless you include the term “unz” in the search string, which means nobody will find our content unless they’re specifically looking for it. The change this morning was that all the pages disappeared with or without “unz.”

    For example, one of my own articles had spent the last ten years generally ranked #2 in some pretty common Google searches that return around 200 million(!) results. But since May it’s been totally disappeared, though it’s still ranked #1 or #2 by Bing and DuckDuckGo. Similar sorts of things for lots of other pages on this website.

    Presumably, the Google people today temporarily applied the same technique to a bunch of other websites, which is the problem with having an unregulated monopoly be the gatekeeper to the Internet.

    • Thanks: Achmed E. Newman
    • Replies: @Kronos
    @Ron Unz

    Any idea if Google has given the same treatment to true leftist/socialist/anti-war websites?

    , @Neoconned
    @Ron Unz

    Steve i found you on a Google search but you were like 8 options down.

  144. as a nothing person, Google finally, found a way to find where I was scurrying with nuggets of nuthin’ nor information…so they shut that door. But, because they are such rich f*cks, they will have to shut their kids’ education or their servants services for people not to find a back door. I hate them so much. I want them to suffer.

  145. @Ron Unz
    One of our regular columnists warned me this morning that we'd been totally "disappeared" from Google results, and that was the case for most of the day. It was only a couple of hours ago I discovered that lots of other "conservative" websites had suffered a similar fate.

    However, Google had actually de-ranked all of our pages in early May, which caused an immediate drop of 15% or more in our regular traffic:

    https://www.unz.com/announcement/record-breaking-traffic-despite-our-purge-from-google-and-facebook/

    Virtually almost none of our pages ever come up in Google searches unless you include the term "unz" in the search string, which means nobody will find our content unless they're specifically looking for it. The change this morning was that all the pages disappeared with or without "unz."

    For example, one of my own articles had spent the last ten years generally ranked #2 in some pretty common Google searches that return around 200 million(!) results. But since May it's been totally disappeared, though it's still ranked #1 or #2 by Bing and DuckDuckGo. Similar sorts of things for lots of other pages on this website.

    Presumably, the Google people today temporarily applied the same technique to a bunch of other websites, which is the problem with having an unregulated monopoly be the gatekeeper to the Internet.

    Replies: @Kronos, @Neoconned

    Any idea if Google has given the same treatment to true leftist/socialist/anti-war websites?

  146. @Kronos
    @Lagertha

    Does anyone have a list from after the 2016 election on which Democratic-orientated pollsters thought it would be a very close election or thought Trump would actually win?

    Replies: @Lagertha

    lists do not apply to Change Agents.

  147. @Chrisnonymous
    @Lot

    What is the advantage of Brave over Vivaldi? (I'm not interested in getting involved in cryptocurrency.)

    Replies: @Lot

    1. Brave has adblock built in.

    2. Brave’s founder is an iSteve commenter.

    3. You can turn the crypto thing off if it isn’t already by default. It doesn’t mine, as in waste a lot of electricity, it gives you “micropayments” for the ads you opt into.

    • Agree: Clyde
    • Thanks: Chrisnonymous
  148. Lot says:
    @The Wild Geese Howard
    @Jack D

    Chrome for Android sounds like my employer's IT department, which blocks me from installing ad-block extensions on the browsers on my work PC.

    You would think they'd want employees to be able to block ads and conserve their precious bandwidth.

    You'd be wrong.

    Agree about having to get news from Russia.

    What a time to be alive.

    Replies: @Lot

    “ You would think they’d want employees to be able to block ads and conserve their precious bandwidth.”

    Ads are a major source of malware spread.

    Further, adblockers tend to blacklist malware domains, so they can stop someone who clicks an email link to a virus. This isn’t great protection as they rotate domains quickly, but if the email is from 10+ days ago it might. They may also just be sloppy and use the blacklisted domain they already have ready access to.

  149. @Jack D
    @The Wild Geese Howard


    Yandex in Russia also offers a search engine.
     
    Who could have imagined 50 years ago that if you wanted politically unbiased information you could no longer trust American sources and would have to get it from Russia.

    If you search for Steve Sailer on Yandex, this site comes up as the #2 link after his Twitter. On google, unz is at the moment #5.

    I have been using the Yandex Android browser on my tablet because (unlike Chrome for Android) it will run Chrome desktop extensions. (Don't ask me why Google won't allow extensions to run under Chrome for Android since it is technically feasible). Specifically I wanted to run the "Bypass Paywalls" extension which allows you to view most soft paywalled newspaper sites without a subscription (WSJ, Washington Post, etc.) .

    Replies: @J.Ross, @Johann Ricke, @The Wild Geese Howard, @Clyde

    https://github.com/iamadamdev/bypass-paywalls-chrome

    It seems to work. Tested it on the WSJ…… Thanks

  150. @Reg Cæsar
    @Anon


    I switched to FireFox with DuckDuckGo as my default search engine months ago and never looked back.
     
    I haven't trusted Firefox since they fired Brendan Eich many years ago.

    Replies: @Clyde

    I haven’t trusted Firefox since they fired Brendan Eich many years ago.

    Same here. I still have it but use it for just a few websites. Brave and Chrome are what I use.

  151. VDARE is being memoryholed. i googled “Michelle Malkin anarcho-tyranny”, compare the bing and google results, google does not list vdare article, bing has it second.

  152. OT:

    14 injured in mass shooting at Chicago funeral

    Chicago Police First Deputy Supt. Eric Carter told reporters the shooting began at around 6:30 p.m. Tuesday when occupants of a black vehicle that drove up to the funeral home opened fire on attendees.

    Those at the funeral then returned fire as the vehicle sped from the scene before crashing midway down the block, causing those inside to flee on foot in multiple directions, he said.

  153. @Jack D
    @Johann Ricke

    For those that don't trust Yandex (personally I don't think I have anything that would interest the FSB) there is also the Kiwi Android browser, which likewise runs Chrome extensions. I believe Kiwi is the product of an independent developer (a one man show) from France .

    Replies: @Clyde

    I cannot vouch for their android versions but in Windows you have Brave that runs chrome extensions. Chromium also.

    https://techwiser.com/best-chromium-browsers-for-android/

    • Thanks: Johann Ricke
    • Replies: @Jack D
    @Clyde

    In Windows, believe it or not the new Edge (which runs on a Chromium base) is pretty good. Somehow Microsoft made a mistake and released a good product.

    Replies: @vhrm

  154. @Lot
    “Tucker Carlson” search on DuckDuckGo: first two results are his personal homepage and his fox page.

    “Rachel Maddow” on Google: First two results are her personal page and MSNBC page.

    “Tucker Carlson” on Google:

    Result 1 is biased wiki page
    2 is a “Vultue.com” accusation of “sexual misconduct”
    3 is CNN saying his “writer quits after secretly posting racist...”

    His Fox page doesn’t come until 7, and his personal homepage isn’t in the first 30 results at all.

    Bigger question for some of you: why haven’t you switched yet to Brave Browser and DuckDuckGo?

    Replies: @Chrisnonymous, @PiltdownMan

    I’ve had DuckDuckGo as my default search engine for a couple of years, and it works well, except, occasionally, Google image search will yield better, more focused results when I’m looking for a suitable image to illustrate a point.

  155. anonymous[373] • Disclaimer says:

    In other news, Detroit is still not social distancing, let alone Black Lives Mattering:

    https://twitter.com/RayGarciahawaii/status/1285483420420837376?s=20

  156. @AKAHorace
    @res

    I googled Steve Sailer. The most interesting thing that I found was that nine years ago he wrote a film review for the Huffington Post. This could never happen now, an editor would be cancelled.

    Replies: @Steve Sailer

    Did I?

    I don’t recall ever writing for the Huffington Post.

    • Replies: @anon
    @Steve Sailer

    Maybe it was really Al Yankovic.

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar

    , @El Dato
    @Steve Sailer

    This is impossibe. iSteve has always been a writer for the Huffington Post. Any remembrance as to the contrary must, and shall be .... corrected.

    Twitter bans QAnon for some reason:

    Twitter bans ‘QAnon activity & content’ in sweeping censorship move… bringing national attention to fringe conspiracies

    , @MEH 0910
    @Steve Sailer

    It looks like Huffington Post reposted a movie review that you did for Taki's Magazine.

    https://www.huffpost.com/author/steve-sailer

    https://www.huffpost.com/entry/polanskis-emghost-writere_b_547444

    https://www.takimag.com/article/polanskis_ghost_writer_and_americanising_britain/

    , @Gordo
    @Steve Sailer

    They must owe you some $ then.

    Take and then dox them for funding a right-wing extremist ;-)

  157. @Steve Sailer
    @AKAHorace

    Did I?

    I don't recall ever writing for the Huffington Post.

    Replies: @anon, @El Dato, @MEH 0910, @Gordo

    Maybe it was really Al Yankovic.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    @anon



    I don’t recall ever writing for the Huffington Post.
     
    Maybe it was really Al Yankovic.
     
    Weird Al Yankovic = Awaken lyric void.



    Huffington Post = Puffing hot snot.

    Replies: @Clyde

  158. @Steve Sailer
    @AKAHorace

    Did I?

    I don't recall ever writing for the Huffington Post.

    Replies: @anon, @El Dato, @MEH 0910, @Gordo

    This is impossibe. iSteve has always been a writer for the Huffington Post. Any remembrance as to the contrary must, and shall be …. corrected.

    Twitter bans QAnon for some reason:

    Twitter bans ‘QAnon activity & content’ in sweeping censorship move… bringing national attention to fringe conspiracies

  159. @Stan d Mute
    “Ernest”? Yikes. Maybe they should memory hole you Steve. But I just checked and you’re still there. For the moment anyway..

    Now about that middle name I just discovered by googling you...

    Replies: @Kylie, @the one they call Desanex, @MEH 0910, @Mr Mox

    “The Importance of Being Ernest” ?

  160. anon[238] • Disclaimer says: • Website
    @James B. Shearer
    Maybe just a glitch. Searching for the left wing lawyers guns and money blog was also failing. But things appear to be back to normal.

    Replies: @ben tillman, @Louis Renault, @Aardvark, @anon

    OP: This happened to a lot of sites today, briefly. Lion of the Blogosphere complained. Socialist sites got whacked.

    The Libertarian International asked members in every country to check and reported that it was in most but not all the US only…but NOT in Congressional offices (I’m always amazed at the Libertarian’s info from having people on ground all over the place). I relate this to the strange stuff with Twitter the other day.

    Just checked your name and “Google has memoryholed my blog…” UNZ comes out on top.

  161. There are Inz, and there is Unz, and never the twain shall meet.

  162. @anon
    @Steve Sailer

    Maybe it was really Al Yankovic.

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar

    I don’t recall ever writing for the Huffington Post.

    Maybe it was really Al Yankovic.

    Weird Al Yankovic = Awaken lyric void.

    Huffington Post = Puffing hot snot.

    • Replies: @Clyde
    @Reg Cæsar

    You are getting good at this.

  163. @Steve Sailer
    @AKAHorace

    Did I?

    I don't recall ever writing for the Huffington Post.

    Replies: @anon, @El Dato, @MEH 0910, @Gordo

  164. @Corvinus
    "Google has memoryholed my blog as well. Try Googling: Steve Sailer"

    We did. It comes up on the first page.

    "Similarly, Google has disappeared..."

    No. Tucker's sites also comes up on the first page.

    Trying to one up your boy Trump with the gaslighting quotient? You know, he was widely panned for his interview with Fox News and Chris Wallace on Sunday. Acing a cognitive test, downplaying Covid-19**, being coy about whether he would accept the election results if he lost.

    https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1285520211593105413

    **Speaking of memory holing

    https://www.unz.com/isteve/arguably-wrong-ballparks-3-different-strageties

    https://www.unz.com/isteve/coronavirus-open-thread/

    Replies: @res, @Ben Kurtz, @Michael S, @Matthew Kelly, @SunBakedSuburb, @Anonymous, @Every court has its jester, @MEH 0910, @anon, @VinnyVette

    The Lincoln Project guys have whipped up a good campaign ad from the FOX interview:

    • Replies: @Sam Malone
    @anon

    Unfortunately I have to admit that's pretty good.

    , @anon
    @anon

    The test Chris Wallace talks much about is this:

    https://www.parkinsons.va.gov/resources/MOCA-Test-English.pdf

    It is not particularly difficult; But President Trump has reason to be proud if he aced it.

    , @anon
    @anon

    Some Lincoln Project guys have actual, real, genuine ties to RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSSSSSUH!

    Nobody at the New Duranty Times will care, of course.


    https://nypost.com/2020/07/21/lincoln-project-founders-have-ties-to-russia-tax-troubles-docs/

  165. MB says: • Website

    This is old news.
    Little grasshopper has been shadowbanned at Goolag for years.
    Bing. Different story, though Ixquick/Startpage is convenient.

    Steve and Ron got enough clout that they just mess with them so far, nothing permanent.

    IOW those in charge of the projector for the electronic version of Plato’s cave are in charge though they try not to make it too obvious.
    No, it doesn’t make any difference if you voted for them or not because that’s only supposed to be the way it works if you really live in a real cave, not a fake one online.

  166. @Reg Cæsar
    @anon



    I don’t recall ever writing for the Huffington Post.
     
    Maybe it was really Al Yankovic.
     
    Weird Al Yankovic = Awaken lyric void.



    Huffington Post = Puffing hot snot.

    Replies: @Clyde

    You are getting good at this.

  167. From the Daily Mail:

    “Google may have a ‘secret blacklist’ of conservative news outlets, a former engineer at the company has claimed, which was exposed on Tuesday when certain websites briefly vanished from Google search results.

    Mike Wacker, a Google engineer who was fired from the company in June 2019 amid a row over his conservative ideology, said the brief incident on Tuesday suggested a ‘blacklist’.”

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8547049/Ex-engineer-Google-says-glitch-blocked-conservative-websites-exposed-secret-internal-list.html

    • Replies: @vhrm
    @notsaying

    i like the mediaote article better (though i too got there via dailymail).

    Here's a very convincing statement from google:



    In response to an inquiry from Mediaite, a spokesman for Google added, “This issue affected a number of sites representing a range of different content and viewpoints. This issue was a technical error unrelated to the content or ideology of the sites affected.
     
    ( https://www.mediaite.com/news/ex-google-engineer-says-glitch-blocking-websites-including-drudge-breitbart-could-have-revealed-a-mysterious-list/ )
    , @El Dato
    @notsaying

    The modern, correct wording is a "denylist".

    , @anon
    @notsaying

    Of course they have a blacklist. Do you know what else they have? They have a system that tracks people who visit websites on the blacklist. It's not necessarily a policy coming form the top. This could be the work of a sole woke employee at the company. People who don't work in tech don't understand how much access IT workers have to personal and sensitive data. You think that there is a magical wall between the IT workers and the database, not true. Mid to low-level IT workers can probably see everything.

  168. Unz Review disappeared as a result for a while with me, first up was wickedpedia’s and the b’nai brith org’s nasty comments on Mister Unz.

    Back now.

  169. @notsaying
    From the Daily Mail:

    "Google may have a 'secret blacklist' of conservative news outlets, a former engineer at the company has claimed, which was exposed on Tuesday when certain websites briefly vanished from Google search results.

    Mike Wacker, a Google engineer who was fired from the company in June 2019 amid a row over his conservative ideology, said the brief incident on Tuesday suggested a 'blacklist'."


    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8547049/Ex-engineer-Google-says-glitch-blocked-conservative-websites-exposed-secret-internal-list.html

    Replies: @vhrm, @El Dato, @anon

    i like the mediaote article better (though i too got there via dailymail).

    Here’s a very convincing statement from google:

    In response to an inquiry from Mediaite, a spokesman for Google added, “This issue affected a number of sites representing a range of different content and viewpoints. This issue was a technical error unrelated to the content or ideology of the sites affected.

    ( https://www.mediaite.com/news/ex-google-engineer-says-glitch-blocking-websites-including-drudge-breitbart-could-have-revealed-a-mysterious-list/ )

  170. @notsaying
    From the Daily Mail:

    "Google may have a 'secret blacklist' of conservative news outlets, a former engineer at the company has claimed, which was exposed on Tuesday when certain websites briefly vanished from Google search results.

    Mike Wacker, a Google engineer who was fired from the company in June 2019 amid a row over his conservative ideology, said the brief incident on Tuesday suggested a 'blacklist'."


    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8547049/Ex-engineer-Google-says-glitch-blocked-conservative-websites-exposed-secret-internal-list.html

    Replies: @vhrm, @El Dato, @anon

    The modern, correct wording is a “denylist”.

  171. @Redman
    @Liberty Mike

    But Steve has been notably silent on the Wuflu for some time now. And especially now that CA is one of the supposed centers of concern.

    I miss Hail, who always had some interesting data to share on how this wasn’t the plague.

    Replies: @Simon Tugmutton, @Jim Don Bob, @MEH 0910

    This is Hail’s blog:

    https://hailtoyou.wordpress.com/

  172. OT:

    Kanye West claimed he is trying to divorce his wife Kim Kardashian while accusing Kris Jenner of engaging in “white supremacy” in the latest rant from the outspoken rapper.

    “I been trying to get divorced since Kim met with Meek at the Warldolf [sic] for ‘prison reform,’” Kanye wrote on Twitter in a reference to rapper Meek Mill.

    “Kriss and Kim put out a statement without my approval … that’s not what a wife should do White supremacy.”

    In the series of missives, West then referred to Jenner, his mother-in-law, as “Kris Jong-Un” and said that the Kardashian’s were attempting to force him into psychiatric treatment.

    “They tried to fly in with 2 doctors to 51/50 me,” West said, referring to the California welfare code for an involuntary hold for people who may be a danger to themselves.

    https://twitter.com/search?q=%22Kris%20Jong-Un%22&src=trend_click

    [MORE]

    Kanye West Tried To Divorce Kim Kardashian And Has A Meltdown On Twitter

    • Replies: @Lurker
    @MEH 0910

    Kris Jong-Un - Lol, that's good.

  173. @MEH 0910
    https://twitter.com/CharlieNash/status/1285612797028700160
    https://twitter.com/CharlieNash/status/1285616706904301569
    https://twitter.com/CharlieNash/status/1285631438902132743

    Replies: @Mr McKenna

    It appears to have been about 90% right and alt-right sites delisted, with about 5% fringe-left and plain old fringe added in for plausible deniability.

    https://www.rt.com/news/495445-google-hides-conservative-alt-news/

    Next time, guaranteed, they will be more subtle.

  174. Seems ok in the UK. Top result is your Wikipedia entry, second is your Twitter and third is a link to your blog.

  175. In the UK there is no problem. 1st entry is Wikipedia page, 2nd Twitter feed, 3rd blog, 4th blog archives.

    The first definite hit that’s not you is on the last entry on the 3rd page of Google.

  176. anon[332] • Disclaimer says:

    That’s why I “deleted”* my google accounts a few months ago. As the twitter hack shows, all it takes is one rouge employee to leak your data or blackmail you. If you think that mid-level google employees can’t read your emails, your YouTube comments, your YouTube history, your purchase history and your search history, you’re kidding yourself.

    As for UNZ.com, I have never entered my email into his database, but he has my IP. If the SPLC got a hold of UNZ’s data, we could all get blackmailed.

    *Can we trust Google to delete our data when we tell them to? I don’t think so. Even if they make an honest effort to delete your data, it’s not deleted. It’s bound to be backed up in multiple places, it could even be on an employee’s laptop because he needed to do a backup before making a potentially breaking change to the system.

    • Replies: @ScarletNumber
    @anon


    all it takes is one rouge employee to leak your data or blackmail you
     
    Was he red in the face?

    Replies: @MEH 0910

  177. anon[332] • Disclaimer says:
    @notsaying
    From the Daily Mail:

    "Google may have a 'secret blacklist' of conservative news outlets, a former engineer at the company has claimed, which was exposed on Tuesday when certain websites briefly vanished from Google search results.

    Mike Wacker, a Google engineer who was fired from the company in June 2019 amid a row over his conservative ideology, said the brief incident on Tuesday suggested a 'blacklist'."


    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8547049/Ex-engineer-Google-says-glitch-blocked-conservative-websites-exposed-secret-internal-list.html

    Replies: @vhrm, @El Dato, @anon

    Of course they have a blacklist. Do you know what else they have? They have a system that tracks people who visit websites on the blacklist. It’s not necessarily a policy coming form the top. This could be the work of a sole woke employee at the company. People who don’t work in tech don’t understand how much access IT workers have to personal and sensitive data. You think that there is a magical wall between the IT workers and the database, not true. Mid to low-level IT workers can probably see everything.

  178. @MEH 0910
    https://twitter.com/roddreher/status/1285635377567588354

    Replies: @YetAnotherAnon

    Have other blacklisted conservative sites been returned? Does Google have an explanation for what they did?

    I think you’re seeing things, my dear chap. Your sites didn’t disappear. Maybe you’re working too hard.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaslight_(1940_film)

  179. @Colin Wright
    All this puts me in mind of the prequels to the attempted coup that led to the Spanish Civil War and ultimately Franco, and Pinochet overthrowing Allende, and Hitler coming to power.

    Everyone knows all about the fierce bad man. What they forget about are the abuses of power on the part of the Left that brought it on.

    Replies: @Wielgus

    Pinochet was the classic US shill, also beloved of Margaret Thatcher.
    When Bani Sadr had to flee Iran, a Farsi rhyme went like this in translation – “Bani Sadr is like Pinochet/Under his moustache it says USA”.

  180. @Redman
    @Liberty Mike

    But Steve has been notably silent on the Wuflu for some time now. And especially now that CA is one of the supposed centers of concern.

    I miss Hail, who always had some interesting data to share on how this wasn’t the plague.

    Replies: @Simon Tugmutton, @Jim Don Bob, @MEH 0910

    Here is Angelo Codevilla on TPTB using the Kung Flu to strengthen their grip on power: https://americanmind.org/essays/the-covid-coup/

    • Replies: @Liberty Mike
    @Jim Don Bob

    Thanks, its a good read.

    If its Codevilla, it is a must read.

  181. I’ve been following this blog occasionally for a decade now. Even though I have it bookmarked somewhere in my favorites, I would always put “isteve” in google because it was faster for me. And the search result was always the same: Steve’s blog would always be at the top of searches, along with the movie “x”. But earlier this May, that changed.

    Entering the term “isteve” would no longer show a link to Steve’s blog as before, but only a link to Steve Jobs’ biopic. To find a link to Steve’s blog, I had to go through, depending on the day, 5-15 pages of google search results.

    So, after a few days, I started putting “isteve unz” in google search engine. The result: Steve’s blog showing again in the top of the search results. Until yesterday afternoon.

    Since then, multiple entries of the term “isteve unz” would result in links to Steve’s wiki page, his twitter address, a couple of links to pinterest and facebook pages where his blog was mentioned, but the direct link to the blog disappeared from the first page of search results.

    Then I saw on twitter that Rod Dreher was complaining of the same problem with his blog.

    However, today (1PM CET- I am writing this from Central Europe) the situation has returned to normal. At least that’s what it looks like – for now.

    This is not something new. About 8-10 years ago, while following Moldbug’s Unqualified Reservations blog, I came across a post dedicated to the sudden disappearance of the (now defunct) NRx blog “Mangan’s” from Google search results.

    Moldbug then speculated that it was a private revenge of a Google employee who obviously did not like the content of the blog. It was an extremely unusual and odd situation, so that explanation sounded logical at the time, but, from today’s perspective, this does not seem to be the case.

    In any case, the normalization of google search results today compared to yesterday could be the result of a reaction from authors and readers.

    But it’s also possible that the google team is simply brazenly toying with search results – deindexing „troublesome“ pages for a while, and once it’s detected and provoked a reaction, the same people return all search results to their previous state and then cynically accuse anyone who objected – the authors of politically incorrect / conservative / right-wing blogs and their readers – as liars and paranoids.

    This is already happening in some comments on twitter.

  182. @Corvinus
    "Google has memoryholed my blog as well. Try Googling: Steve Sailer"

    We did. It comes up on the first page.

    "Similarly, Google has disappeared..."

    No. Tucker's sites also comes up on the first page.

    Trying to one up your boy Trump with the gaslighting quotient? You know, he was widely panned for his interview with Fox News and Chris Wallace on Sunday. Acing a cognitive test, downplaying Covid-19**, being coy about whether he would accept the election results if he lost.

    https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1285520211593105413

    **Speaking of memory holing

    https://www.unz.com/isteve/arguably-wrong-ballparks-3-different-strageties

    https://www.unz.com/isteve/coronavirus-open-thread/

    Replies: @res, @Ben Kurtz, @Michael S, @Matthew Kelly, @SunBakedSuburb, @Anonymous, @Every court has its jester, @MEH 0910, @anon, @VinnyVette

    You need a knew handle something like… Trolliusmaximus would be a good fit.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    @VinnyVette

    "You need a knew handle something like… Trolliusmaximus would be a good fit."

    You and others here have a nasty habit of making wild generalizations, which is a barrier to cogent analysis. I will take the VV seal of disapproval (aka Corvy's a troll) as me being on the right side of the argument.

  183. @anon
    @Corvinus

    The Lincoln Project guys have whipped up a good campaign ad from the FOX interview:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gsaO3v4SvwA

    Replies: @Sam Malone, @anon, @anon

    Unfortunately I have to admit that’s pretty good.

  184. @Charles Pewitt
    Destroy Google Now!

    I wrote this in August of 2017 about GOOGLE:

    Google billionaire Eric Schmidt went to Neo-Con headquarters at American Enterprise Institute in 2015 and pushed for more open borders mass immigration and amnesty for illegal alien invaders. Google billionaire Schmidt is an evil baby boomer who wants to racially transform the United States using mass immigration.

     


    Wojcicki is by no means alone among the Google plutocrats in her desire to destroy the United States using mass immigration. Almost all the plutocrats who control Google are fanatical open borders mass immigration supporters.

     


    President Trump must immediately begin the process by which Google can be broken up into bits. Google must either be destroyed or obliterated with little bits remaining. Google has given notice that they are a clear and present threat to the national security interests of the United States. Dismantle Google or destroy Google, or both, I don’t care how it is done, but Google must not be allowed to retain the political and financial power that they currently hold.

     


    Destroy Google Now!

     

    https://www.unz.com/isteve/when-will-vicious-nobodies-like-james-damore-stop-oppressing-billionaire-nepocrats/#comment-1963164

    Tweets from 2015, still fresh:

    https://twitter.com/CharlesPewitt/status/579385331109130240?s=20

    https://twitter.com/CharlesPewitt/status/579020246343950337?s=20

    https://twitter.com/CharlesPewitt/status/577963523738828801?s=20

    Replies: @kaganovitch

    Welcome back Charles! I for one , have missed your ‘on the one hand , on the other hand’ analysis.

    • Thanks: Charles Pewitt
  185. @ben tillman
    @Brás Cubas

    That's not what he means. The blog entries are excluded from the search results.

    Replies: @bossel

    Speaking of morons, this is what Steve wrote:

    Try Googling:

    Steve Sailer

  186. Anonymous[504] • Disclaimer says:

    At least Steve’s borderline-nutso interest in Jewish Southrons has been taken up by… Michael Goodwin of the NY Post? What manner of absurdity could be next this year..?

    “Andrew Jackson: The Musical,” starring Dwayne Johnson?

    “Pat Buchanan: The Special Bitchute Limited Variety Hour,” starring Jordan Peterson?

  187. @njguy73
    @Clifford Brown

    That's not decadence, that's strategy. It's the billionaire telegraphing "I'm just a regular guy" so the stupid masses will trust him while he buys up their dumb asses.

    Replies: @Change that Matters, @Clifford Brown, @Reg Cæsar

    That’s not decadence, that’s strategy. It’s the billionaire telegraphing “I’m just a regular guy” so the stupid masses will trust him while he buys up their dumb asses.

    Guy Kawasaki said his Hawaiian politician father taught him always to dress better than one’s customers or clients or, in Hiram’s case, voters. It’s a matter of showing respect.

    Very good advice, but Guy, who spends a lot of time around SV VCs and is somewhat of one himself now, has since learned to water this down. Evidently if you wear a tie in San Mateo County you’re a snob or something.

  188. @Steve Sailer
    @AKAHorace

    Did I?

    I don't recall ever writing for the Huffington Post.

    Replies: @anon, @El Dato, @MEH 0910, @Gordo

    They must owe you some $ then.

    Take and then dox them for funding a right-wing extremist 😉

  189. @Kylie
    @Rob McX

    "He wasn’t related to Oral Roberts, by any chance? That’s about the worst choice of name I’ve ever come across. It’s just not right for a preacher. He named his son Oral too."

    Lol! No. Speaking about bad names, what about the mayor of Atlanta? Keisha Lance Bottoms.

    Replies: @Lot, @Rob McX, @Kyle, @Jim Bob Lassiter, @Stan d Mute

    Speaking about bad names, what about the mayor of Atlanta? Keisha Lance Bottoms.

    Say, does she have a brother named Keister Bottoms?

  190. @anon
    @Corvinus

    The Lincoln Project guys have whipped up a good campaign ad from the FOX interview:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gsaO3v4SvwA

    Replies: @Sam Malone, @anon, @anon

    The test Chris Wallace talks much about is this:

    https://www.parkinsons.va.gov/resources/MOCA-Test-English.pdf

    It is not particularly difficult; But President Trump has reason to be proud if he aced it.

  191. @Brás Cubas
    Nothing of the sort is happening when I google Steve Sailer. First occurrence: your twitter. Second: your Wikipedia page. Third occurrence: your blog.

    Replies: @ben tillman, @Adam Smith, @Jack D

  192. Just a glitch in the Matrix. It happens when they change something.

    No worries, right?

    • LOL: vhrm
  193. @Corvinus
    @SunBakedSuburb

    "The royal “We”?

    "We" as in people who NOTICE. Mr. Sailer is feigning outrage and being hypocritical in his own right about "memory holing", but I would not expect you to admit it. That is the major point here.

    Now, as far as free speech is concerned, recall the Supreme Court has ruled in several cases that if a private company/organization creates a public forum for speech, the fact that it is a private company/organization allows its immunity from the First and Fourteenth Amendments (Hudgens v. NLRB, Lloyd Corp. v. Tanner, and Central Hardware Co. v. NLRB). Perhaps the Big Bear's lawsuit can make it to the Supreme Court and serve as the impetus for change, considering how today's "cancel culture" is akin to the censorship of the 1950's. And maybe what is needed is a corporate personhood amendment that can reign in social media companies. Then again, the EU may actually set the standards for other nations to follow.

    https://www.irishtimes.com/news/world/europe/why-facebook-wants-the-eu-to-decide-the-limits-of-free-speech-1.4270126


    Different approaches taken by two of the biggest social media giants in recent days have highlighted the high stakes of managing problematic online content. As protests against the killing of black people by police swept the United States, president Donald Trump wrote on Twitter and Facebook “Any difficulty and we will assume control but, when the looting starts, the shooting starts”.
    In a first in its dealings with the US president, Twitter obscured the post with a warning label, saying it violated its rules against glorifying violence.

    But Facebook took a different approach, leaving the president’s post as it was. Chief executive Mark Zuckerberg said that while he found the post “deeply offensive”, it did not violate his company’s policies.

    Both companies have faced consequences.

    Twitter has been the focus of a backlash from Trump, who threatened to “strongly regulate” social media companies or “close them down”. For Facebook, the heat came from employees who openly criticised the company’s inaction. Two of them publicly quit.

    What kind of posts should not be allowed on social media, who should make those decisions, and how, is a regulatory puzzle. And Zuckerberg has asked the European Commission to solve it. In a public discussion with internal market commissioner Thierry Breton last month, the Facebook boss asked the commission to set rules for social media companies to follow. “Basically, the platforms shouldn’t be left to govern themselves,” Zuckerberg said. Europe had the opportunity to set a standard for the world, he argued, and should do so before China did."

    It might seem a strange position for Zuckerberg to take, but it makes sense.

    Such platforms are too big and too famous to host harmful speech without damage to their reputations. If there are to be rules, it’s easier for Facebook to follow one set of them for all of the EU rather than differing laws in each country. And it’s easier if the company does not have to do the expensive and difficult work of solving the riddle itself.

    But as your soy boy Alt Right leader Vox Day pronounced, focus on building your own platforms to avoid the machinations and "convergence" of Google, Twitter, and Facebook.
     

    Finally, per usual, "cancel culture" and "political correctness" needs context. Try to follow along.

    Dennis Miller and Bill Maher --> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ipwMa5uT5es

    https://jacobinmag.com/2020/07/cancel-culture-harpers-letter-free-speech


    Conservatives who historically tended to oppose free speech and held the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) as chief in its pantheon of villains have suddenly rebranded themselves as free expression’s greatest defenders. But while they were happy to defend alt-right provocateur Milo Yiannopoulos’s right to express xenophobic and misogynist comments, when he began talking about the messy complications of the age of consent among gay men, they threw him under the bus.

    Donald Trump has worked to clamp down on trade unions “salting” workplaces, that is, the century-old practice of getting a trade-union-friendly person hired at a workplace that is targeted for unionization. And perhaps most notoriously, the same man who at Mount Rushmore denounced a “far-left fascist [sic] cultural revolution,” calling for “free and open debate” instead, only weeks before used the National Guard to teargas and clear nonviolent protesters from the streets of Washington for the sake of a cheap photo-op.

    One might expect the liberal-left to be among the strongest defenders of free speech at work, and of the right of workers to say what they wish, but too many have enthusiastically called upon employers to fire workers for alleged reactionary speech outside of the workplace, in effect cheering on at-will termination of employment, and embraced the multibillion-dollar human resources department–organized and employer-supervised “sensitivity training” industry, imposing top-down workshops, where workers are petrified they might say the wrong thing.

     

    https://www.harpersbazaar.com/uk/culture/a33296561/cancel-culture-a-force-for-good-or-a-threat-to-free-speech

    The idea of pushing someone out - because they have said or done something perceived to be offensive - leaves no room for growth or learning. Matt Haig describes cancel culture as “anti-progress because it is anti-change”. “Cancelling people pushes them away and makes them more likely to find spaces where bad views are the norm,” he says. “Obviously, if someone has been convicted of, say, violence or sexual assault then they need to be punished, but cancel culture isn’t that. Cancel culture, as I see it, involves the shutting down of different perspectives and treating people like mere disposable artefacts in the cultural economy.”

    ...

    The problem with cancel culture is that it has become too broad, and near meaningless. R Kelly was cancelled over decades of sexual-assault allegations, yet so too was Jodie Comer for dating a Republican. There is no proportion. It is used in so many different contexts, both heavy and light, that it oversimplifies, and loses its weight because it allows those who have engaged in dangerous and/or harmful rhetoric and behaviour to ride on the backlash.

    ...

    In the eyes of cancel culture, people are reduced to good or bad with no room for anything in-between. “The process is like air-brushing someone or something out,” says Beresford, “It doesn’t allow for the possibility that two sides could ever agree, or learn from each other, or could persuade each other of their arguments – or even agree to disagree.”
     

    THE BATTLE AGAINST ‘HATE SPEECH’ ON COLLEGE CAMPUSES GIVES RISE TO A GENERATION THAT HATES SPEECH--NINA BURLEIGH, NEWSWEEK, 5/26/16

    Until it was squashed by administrative decree, Williams College sophomore Zachary Wood headed up an on-campus lecture series called Uncomfortable Learning. Wood, an African-American who grew up in one of the poorer neighborhoods in Washington, D.C., is a self-described liberal, devoted to learning and books. He liked inviting controversial speakers, usually from the political right, to challenge young progressives cloistered in a collegiate utopia at one of the nationʻs great small liberal arts institutions. Last year, though, Wood encountered the limits of free speech at Williams. First, he invited Suzanne Venker, an anti-feminist author and lecturer. After a campus and social media outcry, Woodʻs fellow Uncomfortable Learning leaders disinvited her and then, to avoid further shaming on social media, resigned from the organization.

    Wood then formed a club of one and invited an even more confrontational speaker, British-American writer John Derbyshire. After suggesting that blacks are more antisocial than whites, he wrote that a small percentage is ferociously hostile to whites and will go to great lengths to inconvenience or harm us, while around half will go along [with violence] passively if the five percent take leadership in some event. An hour after Wood advertised Derbyshireʻs speech with a Facebook post, he was swarmed. On Facebook, someone wrote that Wood deserved the oil and whip, a reference to a punishment for slaves. Others accused him of providing a space on campus for hate speech,and began debating how to file a complaint against him. When Wood replied to one critic, “So you would never bring a speaker on the far right, like Venker and Derbyshire? I value the work I do with UL“, someone retorted,“Iʼd rather sell crack first.“

    A few days passed, the outrage kept building, and the university president disinvited Derbyshire. Wood believes students need to hear provocateurs like Derbyshire in order to formulate their own thoughts and challenges. “What is hate speech to begin with,” he asks. “Itʼs what people don t like to hear. Trump has the support of a considerable portion of the American electorate. With someone like him running for president, speaking on national television every day, saying controversial things about the most important issues of our time, it is imperative that we confront offensive views and afford college students the opportunity to learn how to engage constructively with people they vehemently disagree with. Shielding students from microaggressions does not improve their ability to argue effectively; it coddles them. At a time like this, uncomfortable learning is vital.“
     

    Replies: @SunBakedSuburb, @Anonymous, @Rob

    I have the same comment for you that I had for Johnny Walker:

    Jackass,

    Use a MORE tag

    [MORE]

    Like that.

    • Troll: Corvinus
  194. Rob says:

    Is Sundar Pichai a citizen? Regardless, Google employs a lot of aliens, does it not? That sounds a whole lot like foriegners trying to influence the election. If I took media and Democrats at their word, this would be an act of war by these aliens’ native lands. Even if we can’t hold India responsible for what its citizens do, the specific aliens themselves need to be deported if the worked on de-ranking/blacklisting political sites.

    Google may not be planning to permanently de-rank anyone. They may just be planning on having repeated glitches right befòre the election, when they’d be strategically useful, and there’s no threat of a Democratic administration punishing them.

    Lastly, when Sailer or unz.com get memoryholed, we can tell. We can’t tell when a new-ish thing is on the thirtieth page of Google results vs. the where it should be on the first page. That could be where they’re attacking.

  195. This also happened to the largest immigration restrictionist discussion forum in Finland, Hommaforum. Yesterday it was excluded from Google’s search results for some time. Now it’s included again.

    BTW, it’s no DailyStormer, e.g. they have a zero tolerance policy against encouraging violence and an otherwise strict moderation policy. So it’s not like they targeted some real violent extremist site.

    I also read a claim that a Finnish immigration restrictionist activist group was excluded from their results, but I can’t confirm that personally.

  196. @MEH 0910
    OT:
    https://twitter.com/PageSix/status/1285842166485585926

    Kanye West claimed he is trying to divorce his wife Kim Kardashian while accusing Kris Jenner of engaging in “white supremacy” in the latest rant from the outspoken rapper.

    “I been trying to get divorced since Kim met with Meek at the Warldolf [sic] for ‘prison reform,'” Kanye wrote on Twitter in a reference to rapper Meek Mill.

    “Kriss and Kim put out a statement without my approval … that’s not what a wife should do White supremacy.”

    In the series of missives, West then referred to Jenner, his mother-in-law, as “Kris Jong-Un” and said that the Kardashian’s were attempting to force him into psychiatric treatment.

    “They tried to fly in with 2 doctors to 51/50 me,” West said, referring to the California welfare code for an involuntary hold for people who may be a danger to themselves.
     
    https://twitter.com/search?q=%22Kris%20Jong-Un%22&src=trend_click

    Kanye West Tried To Divorce Kim Kardashian And Has A Meltdown On Twitter
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3qfPNhg-tZA

    Replies: @Lurker

    Kris Jong-Un – Lol, that’s good.

    • Agree: MEH 0910
  197. @Clyde
    @Jack D

    I cannot vouch for their android versions but in Windows you have Brave that runs chrome extensions. Chromium also.

    https://techwiser.com/best-chromium-browsers-for-android/

    Replies: @Jack D

    In Windows, believe it or not the new Edge (which runs on a Chromium base) is pretty good. Somehow Microsoft made a mistake and released a good product.

    • Replies: @vhrm
    @Jack D

    Previous Edge was fine too. as a consumer i'm not too thrilled that edge adopted Chromium since it's one less browser choice.

  198. @Brás Cubas
    Nothing of the sort is happening when I google Steve Sailer. First occurrence: your twitter. Second: your Wikipedia page. Third occurrence: your blog.

    Replies: @ben tillman, @Adam Smith, @Jack D

    It was briefly broken and by the time you googled they had fixed it.

  199. @Je Suis Omar Mateen
    @Liberty Mike

    "Well, we can be sure that the Googlemeister did not memory-hole Steve upon the basis of his coronadoom."

    I meant to hit disagree. ZHedge has orgasmically shilled for CoronaHoax the past five months and was attacked anyway by g00gle because commenters overwhelmingly called BS on the hoax. Oh yeah baby, g00gle reads our comments, QED.

    Replies: @Liberty Mike

    Good observation.

  200. @Jim Don Bob
    @Redman

    Here is Angelo Codevilla on TPTB using the Kung Flu to strengthen their grip on power: https://americanmind.org/essays/the-covid-coup/

    Replies: @Liberty Mike

    Thanks, its a good read.

    If its Codevilla, it is a must read.

  201. Yahoo is probably going to end comment sections. Under their stories now:
    Our goal is to create a safe and engaging place for users to connect over interests and passions. In order to improve our community experience, we are temporarily suspending article commenting. In the meantime, we welcome your feedback to help us enhance the experience.

    A survey follows with questions about commenting frequency, etc.

  202. @Jack D
    @Clyde

    In Windows, believe it or not the new Edge (which runs on a Chromium base) is pretty good. Somehow Microsoft made a mistake and released a good product.

    Replies: @vhrm

    Previous Edge was fine too. as a consumer i’m not too thrilled that edge adopted Chromium since it’s one less browser choice.

  203. @BB753
    @Kronos

    That's just the tip of the iceberg.

    Replies: @BB753

    Google memoryholes iSteve, but iSteve memoryholes some of my comments. I guess the world is unfair.

  204. @VinnyVette
    @Corvinus

    You need a knew handle something like... Trolliusmaximus would be a good fit.

    Replies: @Corvinus

    “You need a knew handle something like… Trolliusmaximus would be a good fit.”

    You and others here have a nasty habit of making wild generalizations, which is a barrier to cogent analysis. I will take the VV seal of disapproval (aka Corvy’s a troll) as me being on the right side of the argument.

  205. @anon
    @Corvinus

    The Lincoln Project guys have whipped up a good campaign ad from the FOX interview:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gsaO3v4SvwA

    Replies: @Sam Malone, @anon, @anon

    Some Lincoln Project guys have actual, real, genuine ties to RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSSSSSUH!

    Nobody at the New Duranty Times will care, of course.

    https://nypost.com/2020/07/21/lincoln-project-founders-have-ties-to-russia-tax-troubles-docs/

  206. @Prof. Woland
    One other thing, it looks like Trump is getting ready to drop the bomb. Part of the whole Q signaling about the storm is that there would be radio silence and a shut down of communications by the black hats once the SHTF.

    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/07/breaking-us-attorney-john-durham-negotiations-people-guilty-pleas-russia-collusion-scandal/

    Trump is going for the throat with the Durham investigation and if he can get the lower level schlubs to plead guilty and turn on their former superiors, that will simultaneously cut the legs out from under the left while checkmating the next level of operatives. Expect more of this.

    Replies: @BenKenobi, @Neoconned

    I dunno who the radio host was but i randomly was listening the other day & they said indictments were coming in August.

  207. @Ron Unz
    One of our regular columnists warned me this morning that we'd been totally "disappeared" from Google results, and that was the case for most of the day. It was only a couple of hours ago I discovered that lots of other "conservative" websites had suffered a similar fate.

    However, Google had actually de-ranked all of our pages in early May, which caused an immediate drop of 15% or more in our regular traffic:

    https://www.unz.com/announcement/record-breaking-traffic-despite-our-purge-from-google-and-facebook/

    Virtually almost none of our pages ever come up in Google searches unless you include the term "unz" in the search string, which means nobody will find our content unless they're specifically looking for it. The change this morning was that all the pages disappeared with or without "unz."

    For example, one of my own articles had spent the last ten years generally ranked #2 in some pretty common Google searches that return around 200 million(!) results. But since May it's been totally disappeared, though it's still ranked #1 or #2 by Bing and DuckDuckGo. Similar sorts of things for lots of other pages on this website.

    Presumably, the Google people today temporarily applied the same technique to a bunch of other websites, which is the problem with having an unregulated monopoly be the gatekeeper to the Internet.

    Replies: @Kronos, @Neoconned

    Steve i found you on a Google search but you were like 8 options down.

  208. @Achmed E. Newman
    @Art Deco

    See, now I don't get that. You and another commenter (maybe on the another post from today) bring up using a search engine to get to this site. You and the other commenter both are on here a lot. Why would you need the search engine rather than simply typing in 7 characters, and probably only one or two if you've used the browser on that device before recently (text completion)?

    How hard is it to type in unz.com? I ask you this, Art, because I do see loads of people do this to get to websites they go to all the time. I know these simple URLs, unz, vdare, peakstupidity, zerohedge, instapundit, etc, by heart, like I know the phone numbers of people, family or friends, who've had the same mobile or land lines for a long time.

    Replies: @ScarletNumber

    As much as I hate to agree with you, you are correct. Why would you need a search engine to find a website you regularly visit? Especially one with three letters. Hell this is one of the eight suggested favorites Chrome suggests, so I don’t even have to type anything to get here.

    Art Deco, you are a dope.

  209. @anon
    That's why I "deleted"* my google accounts a few months ago. As the twitter hack shows, all it takes is one rouge employee to leak your data or blackmail you. If you think that mid-level google employees can't read your emails, your YouTube comments, your YouTube history, your purchase history and your search history, you're kidding yourself.

    As for UNZ.com, I have never entered my email into his database, but he has my IP. If the SPLC got a hold of UNZ's data, we could all get blackmailed.

    *Can we trust Google to delete our data when we tell them to? I don't think so. Even if they make an honest effort to delete your data, it's not deleted. It's bound to be backed up in multiple places, it could even be on an employee's laptop because he needed to do a backup before making a potentially breaking change to the system.

    Replies: @ScarletNumber

    all it takes is one rouge employee to leak your data or blackmail you

    Was he red in the face?

    • Replies: @MEH 0910
    @ScarletNumber

    https://pics.me.me/rouge-one-a-star-wars-story-spelling-is-important-9784524.png

  210. @ScarletNumber
    @anon


    all it takes is one rouge employee to leak your data or blackmail you
     
    Was he red in the face?

    Replies: @MEH 0910

    • LOL: ScarletNumber
  211. Anonymous[396] • Disclaimer says:
    @Kronos

    It’s almost as if there’s an election coming up and Google is going for maximum election interference.
     
    I'm assuming they (Google) fear that Biden will actually flop harder than Hillary in 2016. Does anyone want to make any side bets on a 2020 Trump landslide?

    http://voxday.blogspot.com/2020/07/betting-on-trumpslide.html

    Replies: @Anonymous

    Still early in the game. Lots can happen from now to November.

    At the beginning of the year I was sure Trump would win, after all the economy was doing well, and its rare for incumbents to lose absent major incompetence or misfortune.

    Then corona hit and the economy went to shit. I was sure Trump would lose.

    Now the Democrats have lost their minds and are methodically destroying the country. It’s tempting to now assume Trump will win, but really, who knows what’s going to happen next?

  212. @Redman
    @Liberty Mike

    But Steve has been notably silent on the Wuflu for some time now. And especially now that CA is one of the supposed centers of concern.

    I miss Hail, who always had some interesting data to share on how this wasn’t the plague.

    Replies: @Simon Tugmutton, @Jim Don Bob, @MEH 0910

    I miss Hail, who always had some interesting data to share on how this wasn’t the plague.

    The day after you posted your comment, Hail put up a new piece on his blog, his first since June 28th:

    https://hailtoyou.wordpress.com/2020/07/22/on-white-fragility-and-the-academia-to-mainstream-pipeline-an-investigation-into-white-fragility-theory-and-its-life-cycle-from-2011-to-2020/

    And here I thought the coronavirus had got him. Hail still hasn’t resumed commenting here at Unz Review.

    • Replies: @MEH 0910
    @MEH 0910

    And Hail posted another piece after I looked at his blog yesterday:

    https://hailtoyou.wordpress.com/2020/08/03/who-radicalized-robin-diangelo-a-biographical-investigation-into-the-coiner-and-promoter-of-white-fragility-theory/

  213. @MEH 0910
    @Redman


    I miss Hail, who always had some interesting data to share on how this wasn’t the plague.
     
    The day after you posted your comment, Hail put up a new piece on his blog, his first since June 28th:

    https://hailtoyou.wordpress.com/2020/07/22/on-white-fragility-and-the-academia-to-mainstream-pipeline-an-investigation-into-white-fragility-theory-and-its-life-cycle-from-2011-to-2020/

    And here I thought the coronavirus had got him. Hail still hasn't resumed commenting here at Unz Review.

    Replies: @MEH 0910

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to All Steve Sailer Comments via RSS