The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 TeasersRussian Reaction Blog
YouTube Is Basically Killing Everyone
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

(1) So yes, basically everyone Alt Right OR Alt Lite is now getting their channels deleted, demonetized, or at least having some of their videos deleted.

I don’t closely follow the vlogosphere, but here is a Twitter thread that seems to be pretty comprehensive.

It’s worth pointing out that demonetization is nearly as bad as an outright ban, as it demoralizes creators, and in some cases, cuts off their main source of income. Relying on Patreon or Subscribestars (a recent and less PC Russian alternative) is a bandaid – while we greatly appreciate the exceptions, anonymous readers are rarely very generous, and you need to be really big to make even a decent living off public donations. And they can always shut you down as well. Patreon is more than happy to kick controversial people off by itself, while Subscribestars had to cease operations for a period of time after PayPal cut them off.

(2) Guess the Alt Lite and BASED conservatives should have protested more when this started i.e. when Andrew Anglin (Daily Stormer) got deplatformed in the wake of Charlottesville almost two years ago. Now it’s too late.

(3) I am assuming that Trump is continuing to monitor censorship… all the way to losing in 2020 and going to prison soon afterwards.

At that point, most likely everything else will be shut down.

(4) I have a blog post ready to go about how the vlogosphere has superseded the old blogosphere over the past few years. Obviously, it will now have to be substantially rewritten.

But the main point to take from here is that YouTube is not going to become the center of anti-Establishment dissidence that we thought it might be, just as similar delusions about the power of Twitter and other social media were dispelled from around 2017*.

YouTube will become a repository for cat and unpacking videos.

(5) Yes, alternatives exist, but by and large, people are not going to bother going to Bitchute or RuTube. Three reasons why.

First, they are much smaller than YouTube, which is a de facto monopolist in this sphere, and so derives vast benefits from network effects.

Second, YouTube operates on an annual loss of a billion dollars. It is something that Alphabet subsidizes for presumably political reasons. No other site can afford to be a YouTube. Videos take up a lot of storage space, and HDD’s don’t come free!

Third, let’s be honest, many of the people driven off are not so much dissidents as assorted freaks and weirdos. Their presence will deter “normies” from migrating over. We already have a perfect example of that with Gab (Twitter alternative) and Voat (Reddit alternative).

(6) There are increasing signs that Alt Leftists are going to be progressively shut down as well – some of those deplatformed today were outright anti-Alt Right.

Moreover, apart from institutionalizing blank slatism, YouTube is also committing to fighting “falsehoods” such as 9/11 or Sandy Hook conspiracy theories. While I do not buy into those two in particular, imagine if YouTube had existed in the 1960s, and it censored “conspiracy theories” portraying the Gulf of Tonkin incident as the “false flag” it turned out to be. And we don’t even have to look decades back. The Saudis are clearly going out of the way building a case for war with Iran, with those ridiculous “Iranian attacks” on their oil tankers. Fortunately, false flagging is an O-Ring task, and Saudis are apparently too low IQ to accomplish that. And half of the US political elites don’t have it out for Iran anyway, so there is institutional resistance.

But what if there were similar attempts to false flag a war with Russia? Or with China, whose demonization has also become increasingly bipartisan? The inability to debunk false flags – or rather, to have it catch fire – may well result in avoidable wars.

(7) Prediction: The last dissident resources in the West to remain standing will be technically adept websites financed by moneyed individuals or groups (such as The Unz Review), or true cyberpunk “samizdat” outfits lurking in the deep web and kept afloat with crypto donations (such as The Daily Stormer).

(8) There is no reason for repression not to increase just as concrete genomic evidence of group differences in personality traits starts getting published on a large scale. Historically, it is often at precisely such moments of stress that repression is maximized. It also serves the elite’s interests, as spandrell has pointed out in a recent blog post. Nothing undermines their high status more than HBD, because it suggests that their success is achieved through genetic privilege, as opposed to their own hard work and moral superiority.

To end this on a futurist cyberpunk note, it will also very conveniently make it easier for them to ban genomic augmentation of intelligence and other desirable traits e.g. for social justice reasons, while many of them quietly make use of such “black clinics” in less regulated Third World countries.

Silver lining: Filtering out the more r-selected content?

(9) The one happy thing about all this is that more and more restrictions and censorship means higher quality output.

First, it weeds out the grifters – no point to grifting when you are blacklisted and deplatformed from everything.

Second, it may also impose a certain discipline on content producers, forcing them to pick their words with care while making the same points they used to. Note that most of the greatest “subversive” literature was produced in moderately repressive ancien regimes, not democratic republics with strong freedoms of speech. When everything has been banned, the novels of Houellebecq, for instance, may have that much more weight and resonance.

Assuming they don’t go full Leninist and turn everything into a wasteland, anyway.

 
Hide 503 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. Please keep off topic posts to the current Open Thread.

    If you are new to my work, start here.

    ***

    As reiner Tor points out, this was also probably a sign from God not to engage in vlogging. Since it now seems there is no way to be famous, edgy, and uncensored on YouTube, I am probably going to deprioritize these plans going forwards. I suppose it is good that it happened now, before I invested any significant time or energy into this enterprise (apart from ordering a mini-tripod for my smartphone). As for using Russian alternatives, apart from the aforementioned problem of all the significant Russians being on YouTube as well, I am certainly not going to be talking about Dagestani IQs on Russian platforms (i.e. for the same reason that German nationalists use VK over Facebook).

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    'Since it now seems there is no way to be famous, edgy, and uncensored on YouTube'

    Have you tried makeup tutorials?

    You can have a career explaining how to insert tampons to 13 year old girls and when you are called out on it just ask people if they are transphobic.

    Also you might try reviewing vintage toys:

    https://youtu.be/Yo5yF9RP86U

    Good luck cameraden
    , @Gg Mo
    Anti-neocon , Ryan Dawson has been massive deplatformed over the years.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=95X-cPCNrd0
    , @Che Guava
    Anatoly,

    Talking head videos on u-Tube are, to me, as worthless as cat videos.

    The best way to present such ideas is in writing.

    A debate among several parties, where the opponents aren't aware of exactly what the other side will say, sure, video and print are both valid, and have different effects.

    I was surprised by the rise of (mainly doctrinaire western leftist) solo talking-head videos on u-Tube.

    It has always seemed to me a symptom of cultural breakdown.

    Too many people are now semi-literate, so they can't really read.

    A solo talking-head video only has value if it has very strong performance or background montage elements (whether to the point or nonsensical).

    Otherwise, why not just offer it for reading. Of course, all too many people can't really read, thus the rise of this genre.

    Moronic western leftists were doing it (the plain talking head, usually while wearing a mask) over a decade ago, some had fairly large numbers of viewers.

    The only thing that says is that their viewers are morons.

    Anglin is pretty smart, and I would guess from this article, that you, Anatoly, also read the Stormer at times. It sure gives me a laugh after work at times.

    I said 'no' to a tape-loop and electronic music project of mine being made available for download (four or so years ago). 'I hold the copyrights'.

    I checked, I would suppose it was the same person, since there were six different covers, and the u-Tube videos all have the same cover that was earlier on offer.

    I have better and more essential things to do than send Google a take-down notice.

    They would likely not respond in any case.

    Google has been allowed to massively viovate copyrights as an instrument of Judaeo-Yankee state policy.

    While Napster was shut down, and new Napster was shut down, Youtube was allowed to massively violate copyriights.

    It is an evil joke, an act of the state, pure and simple .
    , @niteranger
    Once again Anatoly you seem to miss the important part: Youtube, Google, Instagram, Facebook and so forth are controlled by whom......The Fucking Mennonites and Amish .....Right! No the Magic Jews who run everything in the economic, social, and political pathways of this country and the world. This is just part of their plan to Dehumanize everyone who disagrees with their beliefs that they are the superior races and we must obey them.

    Lenin (who was part Jewish) used mass murder. Today's Jewish Mob and their friends use mass social dehumanization.
    , @niteranger
    Here you go Anatoly. I don't make things up:


    Jonathan Greenblatt, chief executive of the Anti-Defamation League, which researches anti-Semitism, said it had provided input to YouTube on the policy change.

    While this is an important step forward, this move alone is insufficient and must be followed by many more changes from YouTube and other tech companies to adequately counter the scourge of online hate and extremism,” he said in a statement.



    THEY OWN THE WORLD.....AND THEY DON'T GIVE A FUCK....IF YOU KNOW IT! BECAUSE YOU CAN'T DO ANYTHING ABOUT YOU ANTISEMITIC WHITE MAN.......
  2. anon[300] • Disclaimer says:

    It will become a repository for cat and unpacking videos.

    As you said. No matter how big it seems to us, politics is minuscule part of youtube content.
    Of top YT videos, none is political.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_most-viewed_YouTube_videos

    The normies are on Youtube to listen to music and watch cat and dog videos. This is core YT audience. If YT shut down all politics left, right and center, normies would not notice at all.

    The inability to debunk false flags – or rather, to have it catch fire – may well result in avoidable wars.

    Did it ever worked? When was the last time when war was prevented by brave citizen journalists debunking war propaganda?
    Remember Iraq war – there was open debate on the internet, the WMD scare was thoroughly discredited, millions of people worldwide protested, and it did not mattered at all.

    • Agree: Ragno
    • Replies: @Cagey Beast
    It's impossible to prove, of course, but there were several times over the last few years that the West might have intervened in Syria if the alternative media wasn't around to take the steam out of the globalists' push for war. The same may even be true about Ukraine. I think so.
    , @Reg Cæsar

    The normies are on Youtube to listen to music and watch cat and dog videos.
     
    Don't forget tutorials.

    "How to end-run social media censorship" could be a good one-- if it gets through.

    , @Justvisiting
    Cat videos will have to be banned as well. Cat "owners" are haters violating the rights of cats that should be free, at least according to radical animal rights activists!
    , @Kopfz

    The inability to debunk false flags – or rather, to have it catch fire – may well result in avoidable wars.

    Did it ever worked?
     
    No, because the Military Industrial Complex marches on regardless of public opinion.

    It should be rather clear to all Americans on how to enact change, and if it isn't, let me spell it out to you. Google up a list of US Senators, and then order that list by time in office. There, now you know why things never change. If you want to change the US, stop thinking in terms of who you want elected, and start thinking of terms of voting out entrenched warmongers. US needs to vote out any and every Senator that has been in power for more than a decade. That's the deep state's lever on power. If they're running unopposed, then run against them.
    , @notanon

    When was the last time when war was prevented by brave citizen journalists debunking war propaganda?
     
    Syria
  3. Khm….ahm….you know…perhaps…..”we” could take a look at how people working against Communist regimes, especially Soviet Union/Warsaw Pact managed collaborating, exchanging ideas and similar stuff.

    True, that would, unfortunately, unearth some, how to put it, fundamental problems the alternative is facing today but let’s skip over it at the moment.

    Personally, I am looking forward to the time when all productive chat will be possible between TWO guys who trust each other, somewhere in public. Beach, park, places like that. Brief chat and to the point.
    Old fashion, I know…..
    Relic from era when it worked. When the men were serious and meant business.

    Not quite sure we can have such men anymore.
    The world has changed. Not quite sure for better in that regards.

    • Replies: @iffen
    ”we” could take a look at how people working against Communist regimes, especially Soviet Union/Warsaw Pact managed collaborating, exchanging ideas and similar stuff.

    Sounds like a plan but.

    The big difference that I can see is that the "freedom fighters" against communism could count upon the allegiance of a large % of the population and the acquiescence of an even larger %. I don't see that happening for the benefit of the "freedom fighters" conglomerated here.

  4. Bitchute uses p2p which scales pretty well without requiring youtube-like infrastructure. I wouldn’t dismiss it out of hand.

    For example, when Soph’s “Be not afraid” video was zapped by YT, the Bitchute version picked up 150k views (and counting). That is a decent chunk (maybe 20%) of what it would have got on YT.

    And if a whole bunch of people like Crowder and Sargon etc get booted from YT, bitchute would see a major uptick, and a network effect would kick in.

  5. problem of all the significant Russians being on YouTube as well, I am certainly not going to be talking about Dagestani IQs on Russian platforms (i.e. for the same reason that German nationalists use VK over Facebook).

    If I recall, YouTube is one of the websites the authorities monitor. They are looking at VK and YouTube platforms if you look through the lists.

    https://minjust.ru/ru/mobile/extremist-materials?field_extremist_content_value=&page=24

    They don’t (or didn’t until now) monitor Facebook, Twitter or Instagram though.

    Also when I skim the list, they are only very rarely banning English language material, and it’s really extremist material, not someone discussing IQs.

    Video format though could be good for a lot of topics you blog about. And especially anything related to outside world, travels, architecture, etc, where it could be incorporated into a text blog.

    • Replies: @jimmyriddle
    The Russian authorities and the YouTube censors are both prioritising popular dissident content.

    So, the Russians leave English language conent alone.

    And YT don't bother a channel like Brother Nathaniel (whose entire output consists of "What can I blame the Jews for, today?"). Instead, they go after centre-right anti-globalists like Sargon and Crowder.

    , @Anatoly Karlin
    I am not interested in doing English language video (except appearing on the occasional podcast... which I do anyway).

    Reason I want to do Russian language video, as I did explain IIRC, is that I write things about 5x faster in English than I do in Russian. So writing essays in Russian (https://akarlin.ru/) is highly inefficient - and frankly, I don't want to split efforts between UR and other projects. My longread on Russian IQ (https://sputnikipogrom.com/science/79791/russian-iq/) took me almost a week, whereas I could have banged it out in a day (if I worked hard) for UR. However, I can talk as fast and as fluently in Russian as in English, so in relative terms video is a much more attractive medium for me in Russian.

    However, the prospect of doing battle not just with Center E and Ukrainian brigades but the video hosting platform itself has rather cooled me on that idea...
    , @peterAUS

    YouTube is one of the websites the authorities monitor.....
     
    Yep.

    They don’t (or didn’t until now) monitor Facebook, Twitter or Instagram though.
     
    Hahahahahahahahaaaha.......

    My God, man, you almost gave me hernia.

    I've seen some articles/comments on this site, but this, well......

    Wow...
  6. @anon

    It will become a repository for cat and unpacking videos.
     
    As you said. No matter how big it seems to us, politics is minuscule part of youtube content.
    Of top YT videos, none is political.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_most-viewed_YouTube_videos

    The normies are on Youtube to listen to music and watch cat and dog videos. This is core YT audience. If YT shut down all politics left, right and center, normies would not notice at all.

    The inability to debunk false flags – or rather, to have it catch fire – may well result in avoidable wars.
     
    Did it ever worked? When was the last time when war was prevented by brave citizen journalists debunking war propaganda?
    Remember Iraq war - there was open debate on the internet, the WMD scare was thoroughly discredited, millions of people worldwide protested, and it did not mattered at all.

    It’s impossible to prove, of course, but there were several times over the last few years that the West might have intervened in Syria if the alternative media wasn’t around to take the steam out of the globalists’ push for war. The same may even be true about Ukraine. I think so.

    • Agree: Wally
    • Replies: @anon

    It’s impossible to prove, of course, but there were several times over the last few years that the West might have intervened in Syria if the alternative media wasn’t around to take the steam out of the globalists’ push for war. The same may even be true about Ukraine. I think so.
     
    The only chance for intervention in Syria was in 2013 after Ghouta.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghouta_chemical_attack

    Thank British parliament and Barack Obama, no evidence they were influenced by youtube videos that Ghouta was false flag.

    https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-23892783

    https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2018/06/inside-the-white-house-during-the-syrian-red-line-crisis/561887/

    After we landed in Washington, Obama talked about the different ways in which the debate could play out. “The thing is,” he said, “if we lose this vote, it will drive a stake through the heart of neoconservatism—everyone will see they have no votes.”
     
    Obama was right, but after him came the orange man who pulled the stake out again.
  7. In real estate, Location Location Location.

    In Big Tech, it’s Jews, Jews, Jews.

    • Replies: @Cagey Beast
    Sure man, if it was just us Gentiles doing things, social media would be left open to anyone, even the political enemies of the oligarchs.
    , @mark green
    Hi Priss.

    Allow me to add just a few words to your concise truism.

    'In Big Tech censorship, search manipulation, and deplatforming, it's Jews, Jews, Jews.'
  8. Anon[330] • Disclaimer says:

    Trade war with China is driving this and most things. Everyone has to be on board now with the US. Wars do that.
    Trad media are easy to employ in the game – they hate not being able to dominate eyeballs.

    Trump promised not to put Hilary in prison. They both have people with access to the NSA. Any real threat to Trump and he starts to name names, and even Obama goes to prison. Too much dirt on all sides for blackmail to work anymore.

  9. @Dmitry

    problem of all the significant Russians being on YouTube as well, I am certainly not going to be talking about Dagestani IQs on Russian platforms (i.e. for the same reason that German nationalists use VK over Facebook).
     
    If I recall, YouTube is one of the websites the authorities monitor. They are looking at VK and YouTube platforms if you look through the lists.

    https://minjust.ru/ru/mobile/extremist-materials?field_extremist_content_value=&page=24

    They don't (or didn't until now) monitor Facebook, Twitter or Instagram though.

    Also when I skim the list, they are only very rarely banning English language material, and it's really extremist material, not someone discussing IQs.

    Video format though could be good for a lot of topics you blog about. And especially anything related to outside world, travels, architecture, etc, where it could be incorporated into a text blog.

    The Russian authorities and the YouTube censors are both prioritising popular dissident content.

    So, the Russians leave English language conent alone.

    And YT don’t bother a channel like Brother Nathaniel (whose entire output consists of “What can I blame the Jews for, today?”). Instead, they go after centre-right anti-globalists like Sargon and Crowder.

    • Troll: Saggy
    • Replies: @Mr McKenna

    YT don’t bother a channel like Brother Nathaniel (whose entire output consists of “What can I blame the Jews for, today?”). Instead, they go after centre-right anti-globalists like Sargon and Crowder.
     
    They'll very seldom deplatform clowns. Clowns serve a valuable purpose in de-legitimating the opposition. Look how ridiculous our critics are!

    Meanwhile, I don't watch videos so what happens (or doesn't) on YouTube doesn't matter much to me.

    And a very wise man once said: whatever the censors would cut out, should be cut out. Because if it's obvious enough to the censors, it's probably stupid as well. This is, I believe, what Mr Karlin is driving at when he says:


    it may also impose a certain discipline on content producers, forcing them to pick their words with care... most of the greatest “subversive” literature was produced in moderately repressive ancien regimes, not democratic republics with strong freedoms of speech.
     
    , @Johnny Rottenborough
    jimmyriddle—YouTube does bother Brother Nathanael. From his recent video, Soldier Boy:

    YouTube has censored probably most of my videos. Last week over a 20 minute period, I got 154 notices that YouTube believes in the ‘principles of free speech’. Doesn’t say the First Amendment, but ‘principles of free speech’. And then the big ‘Howwweeeever’. Do you realize they censored my religious video, Messiah Came to Conquer Death, because it’s offensive? Well, who is it offensive to, huh? A little tiny minority that thinks they rule it all.
     
    , @Chris Mallory
    Crowder is a gutless chickenhawk who loved to promote war but never had the balls to sign his name to enlistment papers. He is a big man against idiot college kids, but when faced with grown ups he wets his pants.
    , @Dumbo
    Brother Nathanael has had several videos demonetized or downright censored, and it's not from today.
    , @BengaliCanadianDude
    BN has suffered the pangs of demonetization as well as censorship arising as a result of the current political climate surrounding us. His platform/output is constructed that way(as you say) because there is pinpoint accuracy contained within his words, and because there is an insatiable demand for the answers to many of the persistent problems ailling society and ((who)) is behind them. Brother Nathaniel fulfills that demand with his well-versed knowledge into the instincts and mindsets of them, coupled with his own unmatcheable personal experience( He's Jewish).

    Crowder is an estabilishment republican, and the icon of Pop Culture Republicanism, stretching into a bit of hipsterism. They aren't ans won't be doing anything to him. He regularly attends CPAC, he's a warmongerer and he's an arrogant pseudo intellectual who ( like shapiro) can only handle unprepared college students who haven't brushed up on their information before and don't apply careful scrutiny to the rubbish that he sputters out. Both of these doofuses also engulf these college students with a billion points ina short amount of time as a distraction, as well as utlizing diversionary tactics like constant erruptions, twisting of their words, etc.. He is a pro-war philosemite who (if he could) would estabilish a "Holocaust Memorial Day". Calling him a dishonest, and pathetic pseudointellectual would be doing a major injustice to the words. If I was a word, I would abhor being associated with the ranks of Crowder and company. Puh-Lease.
    , @GreenManalishi
    Brother Nathaniel got shut down.
  10. anon[113] • Disclaimer says:
    @Cagey Beast
    It's impossible to prove, of course, but there were several times over the last few years that the West might have intervened in Syria if the alternative media wasn't around to take the steam out of the globalists' push for war. The same may even be true about Ukraine. I think so.

    It’s impossible to prove, of course, but there were several times over the last few years that the West might have intervened in Syria if the alternative media wasn’t around to take the steam out of the globalists’ push for war. The same may even be true about Ukraine. I think so.

    The only chance for intervention in Syria was in 2013 after Ghouta.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghouta_chemical_attack

    Thank British parliament and Barack Obama, no evidence they were influenced by youtube videos that Ghouta was false flag.

    https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-23892783

    https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2018/06/inside-the-white-house-during-the-syrian-red-line-crisis/561887/

    After we landed in Washington, Obama talked about the different ways in which the debate could play out. “The thing is,” he said, “if we lose this vote, it will drive a stake through the heart of neoconservatism—everyone will see they have no votes.”

    Obama was right, but after him came the orange man who pulled the stake out again.

    • Replies: @Cagey Beast
    Who said anything about YouTube videos? Also, how do you think momentum builds in the British parliament to resist the push to war? Alternative media by its nature is an indirect force.
  11. @Dmitry

    problem of all the significant Russians being on YouTube as well, I am certainly not going to be talking about Dagestani IQs on Russian platforms (i.e. for the same reason that German nationalists use VK over Facebook).
     
    If I recall, YouTube is one of the websites the authorities monitor. They are looking at VK and YouTube platforms if you look through the lists.

    https://minjust.ru/ru/mobile/extremist-materials?field_extremist_content_value=&page=24

    They don't (or didn't until now) monitor Facebook, Twitter or Instagram though.

    Also when I skim the list, they are only very rarely banning English language material, and it's really extremist material, not someone discussing IQs.

    Video format though could be good for a lot of topics you blog about. And especially anything related to outside world, travels, architecture, etc, where it could be incorporated into a text blog.

    I am not interested in doing English language video (except appearing on the occasional podcast… which I do anyway).

    Reason I want to do Russian language video, as I did explain IIRC, is that I write things about 5x faster in English than I do in Russian. So writing essays in Russian (https://akarlin.ru/) is highly inefficient – and frankly, I don’t want to split efforts between UR and other projects. My longread on Russian IQ (https://sputnikipogrom.com/science/79791/russian-iq/) took me almost a week, whereas I could have banged it out in a day (if I worked hard) for UR. However, I can talk as fast and as fluently in Russian as in English, so in relative terms video is a much more attractive medium for me in Russian.

    However, the prospect of doing battle not just with Center E and Ukrainian brigades but the video hosting platform itself has rather cooled me on that idea…

    • Replies: @Mr. XYZ
    Who's Center E?
    , @Dmitry
    Just as my unimportant opinion as a blog consumer, I would say it would be still cool to have a YouTube channel, for occasional embeds.

    You could just use it to add video reports when you go to China, for example, and embed some to this travel videos to already very popular text blog.

    I can recommend (or send) video editing software like Magix.I don't think actual video editing is difficult for that kind of video though. With travel blogs, probably just a steady holding of camera and narration.

    (If you wanted to make infographic videos, I guess it would probably be more time wasting and hard work though - although I wonder if it's becoming easier with later software.)

  12. What is the social aspect of YouTube? What are YouTube’s network effects? I absolutely get why getting kicked off Twitter or Facebook is disastrous. But can’t websites just host their own videos?

    Also, YouTube has been flaky since… forever. Creators have long had complaints about its reporting system.

    • Replies: @Cagey Beast
    Hosting video content can run into serious money due to the data rate. YouTube also give an invaluable service by attracting peopl wjo would otherwise never heard of you.
    , @Anatoly Karlin

    What are YouTube’s network effects?
     
    Recommendations. You get vast numbers of new people getting funneled onto your channel e.g. you watch Molyneux --> JF Gariepy.

    Viewership is systemically higher than for similar profile blogs by up to an order of magnitude. For instance, the typical video by the psychometrist Edward Dutton – probably the most high profile HBD vlogger – gets around 10,000-20,000 views. I am reasonably sure that this is well above what the typical article by James Thompson here gets. My most popular “HBD” article ever – The Idiocy of the Average – got something like 40,000 views if I remember correctly. The Golden One, a Swedish alt right pagan bodybuilder, has 100,000 subscribers, and most of his videos – rather low effort productions with minimal editing or effects – get at least 20,000 views.

    The Alt Right child prodigy “soph” – recently profiled by Mr. Bernstein – is currently just shy of a million subscribers on YouTube. She has had 17 million views since she started her (rather irregular) vlogging career in August 2015. That’s approximately what the Unz Review currently generates in half a year, and we have far, far more visitors now than even just a couple of years ago.

    But can’t websites just host their own videos?
     
    I have no experience with this, but AFAIK hosting videos yourself is more complicated than with just a text/image blog. You'll need to get your own hosting, you generally can't do that on outside platforms, not for free anyway (e.g. on Wordpress.com you need to buy video hosting and its quite costly). Now I recommend self hosting + regular backups anyway for any dissident these days anyway, I am amazed that Heartiste largely neglected that. But AFAIK with video bandwidth usage becomes a major constraint so it can get expensive fast.
    , @Whitewolf

    But can’t websites just host their own videos?
     
    That's how things used to be done. Hosting rates now are a lot more affordable too. Most podcasts are still hosted by their creators.

    People have just got lazy with youtube and enticed by it's huge viewer counts. Much of that viewer count is really inaccessible anyway since youtube can promote any video it wants. The sheer number of videos out there means it's real easy to get lost in the crowd.
  13. @anon

    It’s impossible to prove, of course, but there were several times over the last few years that the West might have intervened in Syria if the alternative media wasn’t around to take the steam out of the globalists’ push for war. The same may even be true about Ukraine. I think so.
     
    The only chance for intervention in Syria was in 2013 after Ghouta.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghouta_chemical_attack

    Thank British parliament and Barack Obama, no evidence they were influenced by youtube videos that Ghouta was false flag.

    https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-23892783

    https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2018/06/inside-the-white-house-during-the-syrian-red-line-crisis/561887/

    After we landed in Washington, Obama talked about the different ways in which the debate could play out. “The thing is,” he said, “if we lose this vote, it will drive a stake through the heart of neoconservatism—everyone will see they have no votes.”
     
    Obama was right, but after him came the orange man who pulled the stake out again.

    Who said anything about YouTube videos? Also, how do you think momentum builds in the British parliament to resist the push to war? Alternative media by its nature is an indirect force.

  14. @E. Harding
    What is the social aspect of YouTube? What are YouTube's network effects? I absolutely get why getting kicked off Twitter or Facebook is disastrous. But can't websites just host their own videos?

    Also, YouTube has been flaky since... forever. Creators have long had complaints about its reporting system.

    Hosting video content can run into serious money due to the data rate. YouTube also give an invaluable service by attracting peopl wjo would otherwise never heard of you.

  15. @E. Harding
    What is the social aspect of YouTube? What are YouTube's network effects? I absolutely get why getting kicked off Twitter or Facebook is disastrous. But can't websites just host their own videos?

    Also, YouTube has been flaky since... forever. Creators have long had complaints about its reporting system.

    What are YouTube’s network effects?

    Recommendations. You get vast numbers of new people getting funneled onto your channel e.g. you watch Molyneux –> JF Gariepy.

    Viewership is systemically higher than for similar profile blogs by up to an order of magnitude. For instance, the typical video by the psychometrist Edward Dutton – probably the most high profile HBD vlogger – gets around 10,000-20,000 views. I am reasonably sure that this is well above what the typical article by James Thompson here gets. My most popular “HBD” article ever – The Idiocy of the Average – got something like 40,000 views if I remember correctly. The Golden One, a Swedish alt right pagan bodybuilder, has 100,000 subscribers, and most of his videos – rather low effort productions with minimal editing or effects – get at least 20,000 views.

    The Alt Right child prodigy “soph” – recently profiled by Mr. Bernstein – is currently just shy of a million subscribers on YouTube. She has had 17 million views since she started her (rather irregular) vlogging career in August 2015. That’s approximately what the Unz Review currently generates in half a year, and we have far, far more visitors now than even just a couple of years ago.

    But can’t websites just host their own videos?

    I have no experience with this, but AFAIK hosting videos yourself is more complicated than with just a text/image blog. You’ll need to get your own hosting, you generally can’t do that on outside platforms, not for free anyway (e.g. on WordPress.com you need to buy video hosting and its quite costly). Now I recommend self hosting + regular backups anyway for any dissident these days anyway, I am amazed that Heartiste largely neglected that. But AFAIK with video bandwidth usage becomes a major constraint so it can get expensive fast.

    • Replies: @Pericles
    The first problem with video is hosting costs, I would say. Disk and bandwidth costs. Media players no longer a problem. Storing the video in the cloud can be problematic since the cloud is owned by Amazon, Google and Microsoft. BitChute using torrents is the way I would go too. The second problem is discovery/search. The third problem is monetization, which might get difficult since the financial system seems increasingly poz. Also, getting a good mobile experience can be hard if you can't get into the app stores.

    Someone suggested uploading to porn sites instead, which is a funny idea and might work for a while. But even if it does, I think that business is mostly run by the Porn-Jew, so it ultimately has the same problems.

    On the bright side, you won't have to compete with YouTube-size investments out of the gate. It will still require some money to run, though. Good luck attracting and monetizing those eyeballs.
    , @Almost Missouri
    What about Vimeo? I sometimes hear that mooted as an alternative to YouTube.
    , @anonymous

    The Alt Right child prodigy “soph”
     
    Goes to show that young age is no protective shield for the whisperings of Satan.

    If she continues along this path, then I wish her a long life... so that the pain can match her spiritual transgressions, see?

    , @anon
    Mike Adams started a video hosting website
    https://support.brighteon.com/Brighteon-tech-update-our-new-censorship-resistant-video-platform.html
    Maybe you might like to try that for vlogging?
  16. @Priss Factor
    In real estate, Location Location Location.

    In Big Tech, it's Jews, Jews, Jews.

    Sure man, if it was just us Gentiles doing things, social media would be left open to anyone, even the political enemies of the oligarchs.

  17. The only solution that I think is lasting is nationalization.

    Google, Apple, Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter, Amazon.

    Uncucked red states should consider a “sovereign Internet”.

    • Replies: @Miro23

    The only solution that I think is lasting is nationalization.

    Google, Apple, Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter, Amazon.

    Uncucked red states should consider a “sovereign Internet”.
     
    Agreed that states are large places with large populations - almost mini countries. They could each set up their own state broadcaster and internet provider/services/software separate from the MSM, to deal with local and international issues from a local benefit POV (i.e. no ME wars).
    , @anon
    We first need a nation (a natal, birth-related group) before we can nationalize anything. The US is not a nation anymore, but a mulikulti empire expressly set against nationalism.
    , @homahr
    Uncucked red states and cucked blue states have one thing in common: they love getting raped by israel
    , @Mishima Zaibatsu
    The problem with this is that the EU, European governments, Britain, Canada and New Zealand have been some of the biggest drivers for this censorship, and demanding YouTube and other sites do more to shut down "hate" for a couple of years now, including with ultimatums, threats to legislate etc.
  18. They haven’t whacked slick Tim Kelly yet. If he is going to go down he is going down with style:

    Matthew Rafael Johnson today on the tubes (on the killing of the Czar and his family):

  19. @Dmitry

    problem of all the significant Russians being on YouTube as well, I am certainly not going to be talking about Dagestani IQs on Russian platforms (i.e. for the same reason that German nationalists use VK over Facebook).
     
    If I recall, YouTube is one of the websites the authorities monitor. They are looking at VK and YouTube platforms if you look through the lists.

    https://minjust.ru/ru/mobile/extremist-materials?field_extremist_content_value=&page=24

    They don't (or didn't until now) monitor Facebook, Twitter or Instagram though.

    Also when I skim the list, they are only very rarely banning English language material, and it's really extremist material, not someone discussing IQs.

    Video format though could be good for a lot of topics you blog about. And especially anything related to outside world, travels, architecture, etc, where it could be incorporated into a text blog.

    YouTube is one of the websites the authorities monitor…..

    Yep.

    They don’t (or didn’t until now) monitor Facebook, Twitter or Instagram though.

    Hahahahahahahahaaaha…….

    My God, man, you almost gave me hernia.

    I’ve seen some articles/comments on this site, but this, well……

    Wow…

    • Agree: Mr McKenna
    • Replies: @Dmitry
    There seems to be no example of Facebook or Twitter posts in the extremist materials list:

    https://minjust.ru/ru/mobile/extremist-materials?field_extremist_content_value=&page=24

    , @Anon
    The "some articles" outmatching the "some comments", by the way.
  20. They’ve actually de-monetized extremely innocuous stuff long before this new wave.

    For example: there are a few YouTube channels I watch that feature footage of people hunting deer and other American wild game. They show how to hunt; how to harvest the animals; and how too cook them. These videos get only a few thousand views, if that, and are not out to hurt anyone.

    But they show how to kill a deer, which was apparently bad, so YouTube de-monetized all of these guys’s videos (no reason was offered, of course), which made it less worthwhile for them to make good videos.

    This is actually really, really bad. It’s not just that we can’t have our politics. YouTube is or was useful for people showing other people how to do practical real things. Like hunting. They’re even getting rid of that stuff. Don’t try and tell me they’re not trying to turn us into sheep.

    • Replies: @ThreeCranes

    "Don’t try and tell me they’re not trying to turn us into sheep."
     
    With the rise of women in the workforce and especially in secondary and university education, there has been a concomitant war on the manly virtues of valor and gallantry.

    Use to be, poets immortalized their civilization's heroes by singing tales of their gallantry and sacrifice. Men fighting to the end when death was all but certain were commemorated and thus granted immortality--as much anyway as can be achieved by mere mortal men.

    Today, with the tearing down of statues and the feminine war on martial virtue, all that is lost. Bravery is no longer considered worthy. Instead, women teachers--and internet censors--promote a sedated, docile keypuncher as the ideal male.

    This goes against the grain of the Universe and won't end well.

    , @El Dato
    Blue-haired ladies in the censorship room don't like dat bambie killed!

    Go to the supermarket to buy meat like everyone else.
    , @iffen
    Don’t try and tell me they’re not trying to turn us into sheep.

    They don't have to; we are natural born sheep. The Borg is the border collie that prevents anyone from breaking away and causing a herd breakup.
    , @anonymous
    If killing defenseless animals from a distance is "brave" and "manly", then the illegal Mexican immigrant working in slaughterhouse killing thousands of animals per day is 1000x braver and manlier than you.
    Deal with it.
  21. @peterAUS

    YouTube is one of the websites the authorities monitor.....
     
    Yep.

    They don’t (or didn’t until now) monitor Facebook, Twitter or Instagram though.
     
    Hahahahahahahahaaaha.......

    My God, man, you almost gave me hernia.

    I've seen some articles/comments on this site, but this, well......

    Wow...

    There seems to be no example of Facebook or Twitter posts in the extremist materials list:

    https://minjust.ru/ru/mobile/extremist-materials?field_extremist_content_value=&page=24

    • Replies: @peterAUS
    Just stop........

    I'll assume, for a second, that you aren't trolling, so here it is, very simple: the "Five Eyes" monitor everything on the (open) Internet. Everything.........

    Here is a personal piece of advice: do not send anything out of your LAN (business, home network, public library...whatever) paired with you name/pic. Not that, if "they" want to get you, will make any difference.

    I know that several characters just got that itch to start talking technology. Don't.

    Yes...you can protect data leaving your LAN,true...and then you can really trigger "them" to start paying attention. I just don't think you'd want that.

    Ah, yes, and if somebody still wants to get "technical", fine. Let's start with Intel assembly, at bit level, peripheral chip(s). And not even that is the lowest "layer" where "they" can hack into your systems. Analog/digital conversion thing, for example.

    There is more.
    If they want, they can put, into your, mine, LAN storage, enough of "something" which could lend you/me in prison.

    They don't do it because it's counterproductive. The sheep....I mean "normies" can get agitated.

    So, they do monitor. Some people can protect their data using a mix of technology and processes/procedures. Will just make the problem worse. They don't really clamp because it's, at this stage, much better to simply monitor.

    I know that my segment of the "Five" knows my name and place of residence. If they want they can pick me up....like ...now. Squashing little me is nothing; agitating the "normies", well, not at this stage.

    Anyway....
  22. Let’s get real the new elite will not be stopped by anything they are doing. I have relatively high IQ and each repressive step they have taken was obvious to me and steps to circumvent it are not hard. Population at large has enough high IQ people to see this coming as well. They are buying them selves time that is all.

    Plus resource pooling and content for new elite does not need YouTube’s network effects. A lot of what you see on YouTube is low quality and useless.

    Look at unauthorized.tv it’s curates content for a specific ideological bend. All of these repressive steps are driving people and resources to islands of sanity.

    Now it does look like we may get to the point of new commies in the west and all the deleterious consequences that come from that. But China survived. Russia survived. The American nation and European nation’s will survive.

    I do appreciate your take AK. Black pills are good motivation for offline.

    • LOL: Tusk
  23. Tucker Carlson and Glenn Greenwald discussed this tonight:

    • Replies: @vinteuil
    Carlson makes the crucial point: if YouTube is going to act as a censor, rather than a neutral platform for free speech, then why is it receiving protection under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act?
  24. @Dmitry
    There seems to be no example of Facebook or Twitter posts in the extremist materials list:

    https://minjust.ru/ru/mobile/extremist-materials?field_extremist_content_value=&page=24

    Just stop……..

    I’ll assume, for a second, that you aren’t trolling, so here it is, very simple: the “Five Eyes” monitor everything on the (open) Internet. Everything………

    Here is a personal piece of advice: do not send anything out of your LAN (business, home network, public library…whatever) paired with you name/pic. Not that, if “they” want to get you, will make any difference.

    I know that several characters just got that itch to start talking technology. Don’t.

    Yes…you can protect data leaving your LAN,true…and then you can really trigger “them” to start paying attention. I just don’t think you’d want that.

    Ah, yes, and if somebody still wants to get “technical”, fine. Let’s start with Intel assembly, at bit level, peripheral chip(s). And not even that is the lowest “layer” where “they” can hack into your systems. Analog/digital conversion thing, for example.

    There is more.
    If they want, they can put, into your, mine, LAN storage, enough of “something” which could lend you/me in prison.

    They don’t do it because it’s counterproductive. The sheep….I mean “normies” can get agitated.

    So, they do monitor. Some people can protect their data using a mix of technology and processes/procedures. Will just make the problem worse. They don’t really clamp because it’s, at this stage, much better to simply monitor.

    I know that my segment of the “Five” knows my name and place of residence. If they want they can pick me up….like …now. Squashing little me is nothing; agitating the “normies”, well, not at this stage.

    Anyway….

    • Replies: @Cagey Beast
    Ah, yes, and if somebody still wants to get “technical”, fine. Let’s start with Intel assembly, at bit level, peripheral chip(s). And not even that is the lowest “layer” where “they” can hack into your systems. Analog/digital conversion thing, for example.

    Intel CPUs have their own complete, UNIX-based operating system baked right in.

    MINIX 3 is believed to be used in the Intel Management Engine (ME) found in Intel's Platform Controller Hub starting with the introduction of ME 11 which is used with Skylake and Kaby Lake processors.

    Its use in the Intel ME makes it the most widely used OS on Intel processors starting as of 2015, with more installations than Microsoft Windows, GNU/Linux, or macOS.
     
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MINIX_3

    MINIX: ​Intel's hidden in-chip operating system
    Buried deep inside your computer's Intel chip is the MINIX operating system and a software stack, which includes networking and a web server. It's slow, hard to get at, and insecure as insecure can be.
    https://www.zdnet.com/article/minix-intels-hidden-in-chip-operating-system/
    , @WHAT
    They are talking about russian state. Anybody home?
    , @Dmitry
    Our blog host (Anatoly Karlin) lives in Moscow.

    A problem for him is that in Russia, there is very strict federal law about not saying anything racist in your articles or videos. And people can be prosecuted and go to prison for producing material that is categorized as "extremist material".

    However, when you look at the material they actually seem to categorize - it's from VK and YouTube, but not from Facebook/Twitter/Instagram.

    So, currently it is they don't seem to be looking onto Facebook/Twitter/Instagram, but they are looking a lot at YouTube/VK.

    He thought that it would be maybe safer on YouTube. I was just warning to be careful a bit in YouTube.

  25. @Anatoly Karlin
    I am not interested in doing English language video (except appearing on the occasional podcast... which I do anyway).

    Reason I want to do Russian language video, as I did explain IIRC, is that I write things about 5x faster in English than I do in Russian. So writing essays in Russian (https://akarlin.ru/) is highly inefficient - and frankly, I don't want to split efforts between UR and other projects. My longread on Russian IQ (https://sputnikipogrom.com/science/79791/russian-iq/) took me almost a week, whereas I could have banged it out in a day (if I worked hard) for UR. However, I can talk as fast and as fluently in Russian as in English, so in relative terms video is a much more attractive medium for me in Russian.

    However, the prospect of doing battle not just with Center E and Ukrainian brigades but the video hosting platform itself has rather cooled me on that idea...

    Who’s Center E?

  26. @peterAUS
    Just stop........

    I'll assume, for a second, that you aren't trolling, so here it is, very simple: the "Five Eyes" monitor everything on the (open) Internet. Everything.........

    Here is a personal piece of advice: do not send anything out of your LAN (business, home network, public library...whatever) paired with you name/pic. Not that, if "they" want to get you, will make any difference.

    I know that several characters just got that itch to start talking technology. Don't.

    Yes...you can protect data leaving your LAN,true...and then you can really trigger "them" to start paying attention. I just don't think you'd want that.

    Ah, yes, and if somebody still wants to get "technical", fine. Let's start with Intel assembly, at bit level, peripheral chip(s). And not even that is the lowest "layer" where "they" can hack into your systems. Analog/digital conversion thing, for example.

    There is more.
    If they want, they can put, into your, mine, LAN storage, enough of "something" which could lend you/me in prison.

    They don't do it because it's counterproductive. The sheep....I mean "normies" can get agitated.

    So, they do monitor. Some people can protect their data using a mix of technology and processes/procedures. Will just make the problem worse. They don't really clamp because it's, at this stage, much better to simply monitor.

    I know that my segment of the "Five" knows my name and place of residence. If they want they can pick me up....like ...now. Squashing little me is nothing; agitating the "normies", well, not at this stage.

    Anyway....

    Ah, yes, and if somebody still wants to get “technical”, fine. Let’s start with Intel assembly, at bit level, peripheral chip(s). And not even that is the lowest “layer” where “they” can hack into your systems. Analog/digital conversion thing, for example.

    Intel CPUs have their own complete, UNIX-based operating system baked right in.

    MINIX 3 is believed to be used in the Intel Management Engine (ME) found in Intel’s Platform Controller Hub starting with the introduction of ME 11 which is used with Skylake and Kaby Lake processors.

    Its use in the Intel ME makes it the most widely used OS on Intel processors starting as of 2015, with more installations than Microsoft Windows, GNU/Linux, or macOS.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MINIX_3

    MINIX: ​Intel’s hidden in-chip operating system
    Buried deep inside your computer’s Intel chip is the MINIX operating system and a software stack, which includes networking and a web server. It’s slow, hard to get at, and insecure as insecure can be.
    https://www.zdnet.com/article/minix-intels-hidden-in-chip-operating-system/

    • Agree: atlantis_dweller
    • Replies: @peterAUS
    Something..... like that.

    Gets better. Zero-day exploit straight into your LAN, just for a couple of hours to take out, or put in, data of interest.

    As I said, I can harden my system(s) here so "they" can't sniff onto what I am sending/receiving. Great...not.
    Because, if everybody else in my part of the city isn't doing it...hehe...why "this fellow" is? "Let's take a better look at what he's hiding".

    And that can, fast, bring the game up to the level I just don't want to be at this stage.

    As for what's leaving my router, well, it's going into ISP router. Enough said.

    As for this site, for example. Do we know exactly where the hard drives housing all this data are? WHO has access to those drives? Physical access I mean. The rest doesn't matter.
    Etc.

    "We" aren't important. A bit of annoyance sometimes, but that's it.
    We'll know we are important when they shut us down completely.

    Until then....a bit of exchanging some harmless ideas (10 %) and having some fun (90%). Pub.
  27. @Cagey Beast
    Ah, yes, and if somebody still wants to get “technical”, fine. Let’s start with Intel assembly, at bit level, peripheral chip(s). And not even that is the lowest “layer” where “they” can hack into your systems. Analog/digital conversion thing, for example.

    Intel CPUs have their own complete, UNIX-based operating system baked right in.

    MINIX 3 is believed to be used in the Intel Management Engine (ME) found in Intel's Platform Controller Hub starting with the introduction of ME 11 which is used with Skylake and Kaby Lake processors.

    Its use in the Intel ME makes it the most widely used OS on Intel processors starting as of 2015, with more installations than Microsoft Windows, GNU/Linux, or macOS.
     
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MINIX_3

    MINIX: ​Intel's hidden in-chip operating system
    Buried deep inside your computer's Intel chip is the MINIX operating system and a software stack, which includes networking and a web server. It's slow, hard to get at, and insecure as insecure can be.
    https://www.zdnet.com/article/minix-intels-hidden-in-chip-operating-system/

    Something….. like that.

    Gets better. Zero-day exploit straight into your LAN, just for a couple of hours to take out, or put in, data of interest.

    As I said, I can harden my system(s) here so “they” can’t sniff onto what I am sending/receiving. Great…not.
    Because, if everybody else in my part of the city isn’t doing it…hehe…why “this fellow” is? “Let’s take a better look at what he’s hiding”.

    And that can, fast, bring the game up to the level I just don’t want to be at this stage.

    As for what’s leaving my router, well, it’s going into ISP router. Enough said.

    As for this site, for example. Do we know exactly where the hard drives housing all this data are? WHO has access to those drives? Physical access I mean. The rest doesn’t matter.
    Etc.

    “We” aren’t important. A bit of annoyance sometimes, but that’s it.
    We’ll know we are important when they shut us down completely.

    Until then….a bit of exchanging some harmless ideas (10 %) and having some fun (90%). Pub.

  28. Google and Facebook both need to go out of business. YouTube used to be good.

    Conservatives need to move to Twitch.

    • Replies: @Haruto Rat

    Conservatives need to move to Twitch.
     
    Getting banned from Twitch is probably easier than getting banned from Youtube:

    Dropping Your Pet Catfish
    Yeah, this is a weird one. Alecludford is an IRL streamer who mainly shares travel/outdoors content such as fishing and cooking streams. Last year, he received a 30-day ban after his pet catfish wriggled out of his hands and fell on the floor.
     
    https://www.streamcrux.com/blog/7-surefire-ways-to-get-yourself-banned-on-twitch/
    , @prime noticer
    "Conservatives need to move to Twitch."

    an alternative that i hadn't considered, but they already ban people at the drop of a hat with no warning under questionable TOS violations for non-political content, so i doubt they'd have any qualms about banning conservative streamers if somebody told them to do so.

    and amazon owns twitch. so eventually. they would be told to do so.

    bezos is less interested and less engaged with the left and their crusade. but amazon still bans books here and there. it wouldn't be an issue to ban a popular conservative streamer. people are there to watch videos games. nobody would come to defend conservative politics guy.

    also, i'm under the impression that the game-o-sphere has a really vocal and aggressive leftist minority. they alone would probably raise enough complaints to get a conservative deep sixed.

    also, there's less opportunity to BE political on twitch. you'd be able to be about as rightist as pewdiepie, or a little less. and that's best case scenario. you will have 1% of his audience as well.
    , @anonymous
    A most appropriate platform for all you degenerate lowlifes exists already... it is called Hellfire.

    The sooner y'all move there, the better for all us normal* people. :D

    *normal people are those who have no particular ill-will against other normal people, except for racist lowlifes, whom we hate viscerally.
  29. Second, YouTube operates on an annual loss of a billion dollars. It is something that Alphabet subsidizes for presumably political reasons.

    Who’s Alphabet?

    • Replies: @Cagey Beast
    It's the parent company of Google and YouTube.
    , @acementhead

    Who’s Alphabet?
     
    For your own safety please restrict your internet use to watching cat videos
    , @El Dato
    "Supiciously Bland Moniker" Company.

    They are also currently pulling in 85x10⁶ USD of profit per day.

    Always remember THAT TGIF meeting

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-he5S1UFeC8

    And what does YouTube do to have a loss of a billion dollar per year? Do they secretly manage bases under extinct volancoes? Apparently in 2012:

    If that advertising revenue is correct YouTube would be set to earn a net revenue of $2.4 billion in 2012 after paying out $1.2 billion in revenue to its various partners who create and post the videos relied on by YouTube’s platform.

     

    After paying, say, USD 500 million for the infrastructure, that would still leave USD 1.9x10⁹ of pure moolah.
    , @SouthBayDave
    Alphabet Inc. is Google's parent company
  30. Meanwhile everyone mindlessly accepts the legal fiction that such a thing as hate speech actually exists.

    When you accept the enemy’s premises, then you will fight the wrong battles, and ultimately lose the war.

    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
    You're right, there is no such thing as hate speech.
    , @Jake
    Exactly.

    If, for example, you use Marxist language and argue as and how and about which Marxists want, then Marxism wins.

    We have been browbeaten and bribed and miseducated into Cultural Marxist language.

  31. No other site can afford to be a YouTube. Videos take up a lot of storage space, and HDD’s don’t come free!

    Also bandwidth. Indeed, I think bandwidth is a greater cost than storage for anyone with decent traffic, which is why non-video sites like DailyStormer are costly to operate even without video: just serving low-storage text and images repeatedly to high volumes of visitors gets expensive.

    Speaking of which,

    true cyberpunk “samizdat” outfits lurking in the deep web and kept afloat with crypto donations (such as The Daily Stormer).

    According to the Anglin, they are not really being kept afloat by crypto donations, they are burning through existing capital. Consequently, he is offering new comment registrations for the next 24 hours or so in hopes of attracting new donors. (Up till today, DailyStormer commenters have been a closed pool for a couple of years.)

  32. @Monotonous Languor
    Meanwhile everyone mindlessly accepts the legal fiction that such a thing as hate speech actually exists.

    When you accept the enemy's premises, then you will fight the wrong battles, and ultimately lose the war.

    You’re right, there is no such thing as hate speech.

  33. @John Burns, Gettysburg Partisan
    They've actually de-monetized extremely innocuous stuff long before this new wave.

    For example: there are a few YouTube channels I watch that feature footage of people hunting deer and other American wild game. They show how to hunt; how to harvest the animals; and how too cook them. These videos get only a few thousand views, if that, and are not out to hurt anyone.

    But they show how to kill a deer, which was apparently bad, so YouTube de-monetized all of these guys's videos (no reason was offered, of course), which made it less worthwhile for them to make good videos.

    This is actually really, really bad. It's not just that we can't have our politics. YouTube is or was useful for people showing other people how to do practical real things. Like hunting. They're even getting rid of that stuff. Don't try and tell me they're not trying to turn us into sheep.

    “Don’t try and tell me they’re not trying to turn us into sheep.”

    With the rise of women in the workforce and especially in secondary and university education, there has been a concomitant war on the manly virtues of valor and gallantry.

    Use to be, poets immortalized their civilization’s heroes by singing tales of their gallantry and sacrifice. Men fighting to the end when death was all but certain were commemorated and thus granted immortality–as much anyway as can be achieved by mere mortal men.

    Today, with the tearing down of statues and the feminine war on martial virtue, all that is lost. Bravery is no longer considered worthy. Instead, women teachers–and internet censors–promote a sedated, docile keypuncher as the ideal male.

    This goes against the grain of the Universe and won’t end well.

    • Replies: @ImmortalRationalist
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jEUXxLlVKLw

    The 19th was a mistake.
    , @anonymous

    With the rise of women in the workforce
     
    Women were always in the workforce, buddy.

    https://images.fineartamerica.com/images/artworkimages/mediumlarge/1/potato-harvest-ludwig-knaus.jpg

    Use to be, poets immortalized their civilization’s heroes by singing tales of their gallantry and sacrifice.
     
    Translation: paid propagandists got the dumbest of the dumb, the ideal cannon fodder to kill and die for someone else wealth and power.

    valor and gallantry.
     
    You live in wrong century, this trash you are peddling was obsolete 100 years ago. If only you were born earlier, you too could be a hero, you too could prove your manly valor against poison gas and machine gun fire.

    https://i.pinimg.com/originals/a0/37/66/a03766080ba5ff06b10fe9567150179a.jpg

    So sad.
  34. @Biff

    Second, YouTube operates on an annual loss of a billion dollars. It is something that Alphabet subsidizes for presumably political reasons.
     
    Who’s Alphabet?

    It’s the parent company of Google and YouTube.

  35. “The one happy thing about all this is that more and more restrictions and censorship means higher quality output.”

    “First, it weeds out the grifters – no point to grifting when you are blacklisted and deplatformed from everything.”

    “Second, it may also impose a certain discipline on content producers, forcing them to pick their words with care while making the same points they used to.”

    Surely you jest. Would have been nice for those folks bitching about their current predicament to have supported my proposed Shall Not Censor legislation

    AK: Removed link because website activates my anti-virus.

    • Replies: @Anatoly Karlin
    I agree, and indeed, I endorsed you on that account for a brief period.

    Assuming you are who you say you are, it would have been even nicer if you hadn't gone crazy and doxed your own people.
  36. @peterAUS
    Just stop........

    I'll assume, for a second, that you aren't trolling, so here it is, very simple: the "Five Eyes" monitor everything on the (open) Internet. Everything.........

    Here is a personal piece of advice: do not send anything out of your LAN (business, home network, public library...whatever) paired with you name/pic. Not that, if "they" want to get you, will make any difference.

    I know that several characters just got that itch to start talking technology. Don't.

    Yes...you can protect data leaving your LAN,true...and then you can really trigger "them" to start paying attention. I just don't think you'd want that.

    Ah, yes, and if somebody still wants to get "technical", fine. Let's start with Intel assembly, at bit level, peripheral chip(s). And not even that is the lowest "layer" where "they" can hack into your systems. Analog/digital conversion thing, for example.

    There is more.
    If they want, they can put, into your, mine, LAN storage, enough of "something" which could lend you/me in prison.

    They don't do it because it's counterproductive. The sheep....I mean "normies" can get agitated.

    So, they do monitor. Some people can protect their data using a mix of technology and processes/procedures. Will just make the problem worse. They don't really clamp because it's, at this stage, much better to simply monitor.

    I know that my segment of the "Five" knows my name and place of residence. If they want they can pick me up....like ...now. Squashing little me is nothing; agitating the "normies", well, not at this stage.

    Anyway....

    They are talking about russian state. Anybody home?

  37. “(6) There are increasing signs that Alt Leftists are going to be progressively shut down as well – some of those deplatformed today were outright anti-Alt Right.”

    Like who?

    AK: See the Greenwald Tweet here.

  38. Harvard Business Review is on the right track with this article: “Disruption Starts with Unhappy Customers, Not Technology“.

    “What these companies seem to have missed is that the most common and pervasive pattern of disruption is driven by customers. They are the ones behind the decisions to adopt or reject new technologies or new products.”

    YT has presented an opportunity. So kind of them.

  39. anon[337] • Disclaimer says:

    “Trade war with China is driving this and most things. Everyone has to be on board now with the US. Wars do that.”

    There are now an enormous number of high-quality anti-Chinese YouTube channels clandestinely funded by the CIA through third parties. They promote all manner of anti-Chinese conspiracy theories and even blatantly lie, stoking animus among viewers. Some of this stuff I’ve seen is certainly a TOS violation. However, I doubt they will be booted any time soon.

    In fact, this action by YouTube looks state-sponsored to me. YouTube initially sided with Crowder, as they should have, but then backtracked in a way that looked like they were resisting under duress: “you violated our standards, but we aren’t going to tell you how, wink wink”. US tech companies used to do this under the Obama regime when his secret police would come by demanding customer personal data; they’d warn customers by a subtle change in their TOS wording (i.e. get out now while you can because we’re being raided).

    Under US deepstate pressure (the controlled media), RT has long been deranked on YouTube, now along with alternative opinion channels like Carl Benjamin – that after banning the guy they feel is responsible for helping Trump beat Hilary the most (Alex Jones); that despite the obvious hypocrisy since 2016: vids critical of Islam and Muslims are banned or demonetized despite YouTube permitting over a decade’s worth of horribly anti-Christian videos from radical Leftists; YouTube continues to allow radical Leftists to put words like “loser” in the titles of far Leftist vids aimed at Donald Trump (they are also allowed blur his face which is dehumanizing) but have banned videos mocking Michelle Obama as being secretly transgender; racism and promotion of violence is okay on YouTube if done by CNN (endorsed antifa), TYT (“oh, you white guys” on election night 2016 + “you wanna nother war!” threatening Texas with violence), and MTV (“Dear white people”); YouTube and other social media long allow promotion of racist “white privilege” language and feminism but have cracked down on anti-feminism; …

    I think this came from the US government. Do you think it’s a coincidence they’ve artificially promoted “authoritative” sources, many of which are used as propaganda against policies and politicians like Trump? Do you think it’s a coincidence they downranked RT and other opposition channels like PressTV? Do you think it’s a coincidence they are promoting late night “comedy” propaganda, nearly all of which has a political bent favored by the elite? This is all being on purpose to build a consensus for their views. The content being banned (racial differences) also makes me think this is a state-sponsored effort at bringing stability … and crushing government dissidents who notice the promoted narrative is logically invalid.

    Personally, I think US conservative red states would be well served by utilizing independent tech companies from China to build a state-sponsored internet alternative, including video services like YouTube. They already do so with public broadcasting, so I don’t see any reason not to expand this to other technologies.

    • Replies: @Miro23

    Personally, I think US conservative red states would be well served by utilizing independent tech companies from China to build a state-sponsored internet alternative, including video services like YouTube. They already do so with public broadcasting, so I don’t see any reason not to expand this to other technologies.
     
    Agree with this. The problem is the centralized power of YouTube, Google etc. The defence is state funding (and political backing) for local alternatives or the break up of YouTube, Google etc. ( for example, a Texas Google under Texas political supervision).

    If the SJW's want their safe spaces protected they can use Washington Google and Washington YouTube.
    , @BengaliCanadianDude
    There is a wide berth of anti muslim and anti islam videos as well as creators who make money off of these vids, and get to stay without being demonetized. In fact, the whole demonetization thing for many of these guys is a rallying cry to gather their nitiwtted supporters to show their pittance, and its a way to garner some tenporary attention while they obnoxiously complain and pretend how they themselves are the biggest victims. Come off it, plenty of these videos there not getting demonetized
  40. anon[337] • Disclaimer says:

    “No other site can afford to be a YouTube. Videos take up a lot of storage space, and HDD’s don’t come free.”

    What stops conservative Red States from banding together to publicly fund an alternative? Don’t they already do this for roads and other social services? State funding along with a few a few tweaks to storage polices (a user data limit or a posted time limit for really old, unpopular vids), could reduce costs without sacrificing functionality or quality. Not to be rude, but why do conservatives lack imagination?

    • Replies: @dfordoom

    Not to be rude, but why do conservatives lack imagination?
     
    It's not that that they have no imagination. It's partly that they have no guts. But it's mostly the fact that they have no principles. They don't do the things you'd like them to do because they're not on your side. They're on the side of their donors. They do what what their donors want them to do. They support the whole globohomo SJW agenda.

    What stops conservative Red States from banding together to publicly fund an alternative?
     
    The fact that conservatives do not want you to have an alternative. They are not on your side.
    , @Reg Cæsar

    Not to be rude, but why do conservatives lack imagination?
     
    All the imagination on the right belongs to reactionaries. It's been that way since Aristophanes.
    , @neutral

    What stops conservative Red States from banding together to publicly fund an alternative?
     
    In the USA and all its puppet regimes (Germany, France, UK, etc) this is impossible. This is neither a technical or business problem, the politics of the land dictate what one is allowed to do, and in the US one is not free to do these things.

    Sure you can talk about "censorship is only when the government does it" nonsense, but in the US the government is simply a rubber stamping authority. What is dictated by the (((ADL))), (((Hollywood))), and the (((mass media))) is what ultimately matters, they will shut you down either by removing your advertisers, or deplatform you, remove your bank account, or even just remove your internet access at the lowest infrastructure levels.

    The solution can only be political, and at this point this means bullets in a lot heads, everything else will not work any more. As somebody already mentioned "conservatives" (really just cuckservatives) are cowards, so don't expect too much from them.

    , @iffen
    but why do conservatives lack imagination?

    Because the basic impulse is to keep everything the way it is right now. No need to think about a "better" way.
  41. YouTube will become a repository for cat and unpacking videos.

    And Ponies! Don’t forget Ponies:

    Ponies are absolutely monetizable!

  42. @Cagey Beast
    Tucker Carlson and Glenn Greenwald discussed this tonight:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p86qD8CINGM

    Carlson makes the crucial point: if YouTube is going to act as a censor, rather than a neutral platform for free speech, then why is it receiving protection under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act?

    • Agree: Cagey Beast
  43. Anonymous[165] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anatoly Karlin
    Please keep off topic posts to the current Open Thread.

    If you are new to my work, start here.

    ***

    As reiner Tor points out, this was also probably a sign from God not to engage in vlogging. Since it now seems there is no way to be famous, edgy, and uncensored on YouTube, I am probably going to deprioritize these plans going forwards. I suppose it is good that it happened now, before I invested any significant time or energy into this enterprise (apart from ordering a mini-tripod for my smartphone). As for using Russian alternatives, apart from the aforementioned problem of all the significant Russians being on YouTube as well, I am certainly not going to be talking about Dagestani IQs on Russian platforms (i.e. for the same reason that German nationalists use VK over Facebook).

    ‘Since it now seems there is no way to be famous, edgy, and uncensored on YouTube’

    Have you tried makeup tutorials?

    You can have a career explaining how to insert tampons to 13 year old girls and when you are called out on it just ask people if they are transphobic.

    Also you might try reviewing vintage toys:

    Good luck cameraden

  44. @jimmyriddle
    The Russian authorities and the YouTube censors are both prioritising popular dissident content.

    So, the Russians leave English language conent alone.

    And YT don't bother a channel like Brother Nathaniel (whose entire output consists of "What can I blame the Jews for, today?"). Instead, they go after centre-right anti-globalists like Sargon and Crowder.

    YT don’t bother a channel like Brother Nathaniel (whose entire output consists of “What can I blame the Jews for, today?”). Instead, they go after centre-right anti-globalists like Sargon and Crowder.

    They’ll very seldom deplatform clowns. Clowns serve a valuable purpose in de-legitimating the opposition. Look how ridiculous our critics are!

    Meanwhile, I don’t watch videos so what happens (or doesn’t) on YouTube doesn’t matter much to me.

    And a very wise man once said: whatever the censors would cut out, should be cut out. Because if it’s obvious enough to the censors, it’s probably stupid as well. This is, I believe, what Mr Karlin is driving at when he says:

    it may also impose a certain discipline on content producers, forcing them to pick their words with care… most of the greatest “subversive” literature was produced in moderately repressive ancien regimes, not democratic republics with strong freedoms of speech.

    • Replies: @Ace
    Free men should not have to pick their words with care. And I'm decidedly uninterested in taking lessons from dissidents on how to conduct political discussions or write clever subversive novels under the noses of the official Ministry of Truth.
    , @Anon
    "And a very wise man once said: whatever the censors would cut out, should be cut out. Because if it’s obvious enough to the censors, it’s probably stupid as well."

    That seems a bit too cute to be true. However, there are likely more than a few cases like Stirner's The Ego & His Own, where the anticipated censorship failed to occur, because the Prussian censor thought the book was too silly to be dangerous.
    , @Dumbo
    I kinda like Brother Nathanael, why a clown? I think someone such as Andrew Anglin plays that "clown" role better.
    , @BengaliCanadianDude
    Brother Nathaniel isnt a troll, not in the slightest
  45. Second, it may also impose a certain discipline on content producers, forcing them to pick their words with care while making the same points they used to. Note that most of the greatest “subversive” literature was produced in moderately repressive ancien regimes, not democratic republics with strong freedoms of speech. When everything has been banned, the novels of Houellebecq, for instance, may have that much more weight and resonance.

    Assuming they don’t go full Leninist and turn everything into a wasteland, anyway.

    I would bet on full Leninism because 1) they control the MSM 2) they know about Ancien Regimes vs.Bolshevism – they were the principal actors 3) the present comatose state of the US population 4) the need to ban firearms and quickly disarm the public.

  46. @216
    The only solution that I think is lasting is nationalization.

    Google, Apple, Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter, Amazon.

    Uncucked red states should consider a "sovereign Internet".

    The only solution that I think is lasting is nationalization.

    Google, Apple, Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter, Amazon.

    Uncucked red states should consider a “sovereign Internet”.

    Agreed that states are large places with large populations – almost mini countries. They could each set up their own state broadcaster and internet provider/services/software separate from the MSM, to deal with local and international issues from a local benefit POV (i.e. no ME wars).

  47. this site will be gone within 1 or 2 years of trump leaving office.

    so enjoy bashing trump while you can, for not being the perfect president. yep, it sucks he’s failed on some issues. been good on other issues. best course of action as always is to continue to press him to deliver. he’s the only option, so keep holding his feet to the fire. worst course of action by far is bitterly posting about how MAGA was a mistake and hoping for him to be gone. it just makes you sound like a 12 year old complaining because he didn’t get everything he wanted for christmas. wah wah, my expectations were unrealistic, he was supposed to turn around 70 years of jewish country destruction in 2 years.

    things will go straight downhill under the next democrat president. that will have a silver lining. at least i won’t have to hear fringe rightists continuously bash one of the few republican presidents to actually try, even if he didn’t deliver on all fronts. instead, there will be a relaxing silence, as all the rightists bashing trump get exactly what they’ve been hoping for, good and hard.

    • Replies: @jeff stryker
    Bush was a Republican and he trashed the US. No matter how you cut it, Bill Clinton's economy and quality of life was better in the nineties than when Bush was elected in the year 2000.

    So it is not just Democrats that trash the country.
    , @Monotonous Languor
    Agreed (site won't let me hit the "agree" button)
    , @Sick of Orcs

    Yep, it sucks he’s failed on some issues. been good on other issues. best course of action as always is to continue to press him to deliver.
     
    Trump failed on the only issue for which he was elected: immigration. Press him? He serves The Nose now, and is a beacon of false hope. Fk him. Thanks to the demographic terrorism he refused to stop he's the last retardican RINO to ever fart in the Oval Office chair.

    Let the rains fall. We were never going to vote our way out of this.

    , @Digital Samizdat
    I was actually kinda sympathetic to your argument until I came to this:

    ... he was supposed to turn around 70 years of jewish country destruction in 2 years.
     
    The problem is not merely that Trump has failed to "turn around" Jewish destruction. No, he has actually dialed up the Zionism to eleven. He moved our embassy to Jerusalem, kept troops in Syria (contrary to his campaign promises), is sending Jared Kushner to the ME to offer the Palestinians terms of surrender (good luck with that), and now the constant sabre-rattling against Iran.

    I don't care what the New York Times says, one thing Trump is not is an 'anti-semite'.
  48. @Tired of Not Winning
    Google and Facebook both need to go out of business. YouTube used to be good.

    Conservatives need to move to Twitch.

    Conservatives need to move to Twitch.

    Getting banned from Twitch is probably easier than getting banned from Youtube:

    Dropping Your Pet Catfish
    Yeah, this is a weird one. Alecludford is an IRL streamer who mainly shares travel/outdoors content such as fishing and cooking streams. Last year, he received a 30-day ban after his pet catfish wriggled out of his hands and fell on the floor.

    https://www.streamcrux.com/blog/7-surefire-ways-to-get-yourself-banned-on-twitch/

  49. @Nehlen
    “The one happy thing about all this is that more and more restrictions and censorship means higher quality output.”

    “First, it weeds out the grifters – no point to grifting when you are blacklisted and deplatformed from everything.”

    “Second, it may also impose a certain discipline on content producers, forcing them to pick their words with care while making the same points they used to.”

    Surely you jest. Would have been nice for those folks bitching about their current predicament to have supported my proposed Shall Not Censor legislation

    AK: Removed link because website activates my anti-virus.

    I agree, and indeed, I endorsed you on that account for a brief period.

    Assuming you are who you say you are, it would have been even nicer if you hadn’t gone crazy and doxed your own people.

    • Replies: @Nehlen
    It’s me and thanks for being honest about your concerns.

    I’d ask you to read this synopsis written back at the time everything happened and makes it clear why I did what I did: https://christophercantwell.com/2018/04/08/doxing-and-anonymity/

    Embedded in that article is the contract RV floated to me at precisely this link https://christophercantwell.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Smartcheckr-Paul-Nehlen-Oct-19.pdf

    When you add everything up, it was clear the RV was a bad actor and his dox ultimately protected other candidates who might have fallen victim to this SmartCheckr scam.

    My policy positions haven’t changed since I ran in 2016: protect American workers and secure the border. I’ve been attacked on both fronts by (((neo-cons))) and (((liberals))) alike, not to mention the undermining done by “my own people” as you labeled them in your response.

    Ultimately, my battle to ensure that social media is treated as the new public square, where lawful speech ought to be protected hasn’t wavered. I’ve spent a small fortune filing an FEC complaint over my treatment by Twitter, where nothing I wrote was unlawful or untruthful.

    Thinking that taking away the dissident right’s voice on social media will lead somewhere other than violence (in Minecraft) is folly. You don’t tell people they have to pay taxes to support ZOG and then also tell them they have no avenue to voice their displeasure with the use of those taxes.
  50. @prime noticer
    this site will be gone within 1 or 2 years of trump leaving office.

    so enjoy bashing trump while you can, for not being the perfect president. yep, it sucks he's failed on some issues. been good on other issues. best course of action as always is to continue to press him to deliver. he's the only option, so keep holding his feet to the fire. worst course of action by far is bitterly posting about how MAGA was a mistake and hoping for him to be gone. it just makes you sound like a 12 year old complaining because he didn't get everything he wanted for christmas. wah wah, my expectations were unrealistic, he was supposed to turn around 70 years of jewish country destruction in 2 years.

    things will go straight downhill under the next democrat president. that will have a silver lining. at least i won't have to hear fringe rightists continuously bash one of the few republican presidents to actually try, even if he didn't deliver on all fronts. instead, there will be a relaxing silence, as all the rightists bashing trump get exactly what they've been hoping for, good and hard.

    Bush was a Republican and he trashed the US. No matter how you cut it, Bill Clinton’s economy and quality of life was better in the nineties than when Bush was elected in the year 2000.

    So it is not just Democrats that trash the country.

    • LOL: ChuckOrloski
    • Replies: @The Alarmist

    "... Bill Clinton’s economy and quality of life was better in the nineties than when Bush was elected in the year 2000."
     
    You might want to re-phrase that, because it implies Clinton inherited a country with a better economy and standard of life from Bush 1 and handed a country worse off to Bush 2.
    , @Justvisiting
    The Republicans believe in putting the car in neutral while we head down-hill towards the cliff--the Democrats want to jam their foot on the accelerator.
  51. @Biff

    Second, YouTube operates on an annual loss of a billion dollars. It is something that Alphabet subsidizes for presumably political reasons.
     
    Who’s Alphabet?

    Who’s Alphabet?

    For your own safety please restrict your internet use to watching cat videos

    • LOL: Twodees Partain
  52. Youtube vs MSM

    Mainstream media has a huge demographic reach. You Tube is interactive.

    Production values are lower for You Tube. Someone like Oprah can spend millions per show and advertising. Your average You Tube platform cannot compete with that. With millions of viewers.

    How many views does the average You Tube channel poster get? Maybe 100,000 hits. Opran has millions of viewers.

    Additionally, You Tube posting does not post jack. Oprah and Cooper earn millions per episode.

  53. @prime noticer
    this site will be gone within 1 or 2 years of trump leaving office.

    so enjoy bashing trump while you can, for not being the perfect president. yep, it sucks he's failed on some issues. been good on other issues. best course of action as always is to continue to press him to deliver. he's the only option, so keep holding his feet to the fire. worst course of action by far is bitterly posting about how MAGA was a mistake and hoping for him to be gone. it just makes you sound like a 12 year old complaining because he didn't get everything he wanted for christmas. wah wah, my expectations were unrealistic, he was supposed to turn around 70 years of jewish country destruction in 2 years.

    things will go straight downhill under the next democrat president. that will have a silver lining. at least i won't have to hear fringe rightists continuously bash one of the few republican presidents to actually try, even if he didn't deliver on all fronts. instead, there will be a relaxing silence, as all the rightists bashing trump get exactly what they've been hoping for, good and hard.

    Agreed (site won’t let me hit the “agree” button)

  54. @Tired of Not Winning
    Google and Facebook both need to go out of business. YouTube used to be good.

    Conservatives need to move to Twitch.

    “Conservatives need to move to Twitch.”

    an alternative that i hadn’t considered, but they already ban people at the drop of a hat with no warning under questionable TOS violations for non-political content, so i doubt they’d have any qualms about banning conservative streamers if somebody told them to do so.

    and amazon owns twitch. so eventually. they would be told to do so.

    bezos is less interested and less engaged with the left and their crusade. but amazon still bans books here and there. it wouldn’t be an issue to ban a popular conservative streamer. people are there to watch videos games. nobody would come to defend conservative politics guy.

    also, i’m under the impression that the game-o-sphere has a really vocal and aggressive leftist minority. they alone would probably raise enough complaints to get a conservative deep sixed.

    also, there’s less opportunity to BE political on twitch. you’d be able to be about as rightist as pewdiepie, or a little less. and that’s best case scenario. you will have 1% of his audience as well.

    • Replies: @Tired of Not Winning
    Dang. Never mind then. Forget Twitch.

    Too bad Vimeo is not an open platform. But they probably pull the same shit, being founded by "Jack Klein".

  55. How about an audio only operation like Sound Cloud? Much cheaper to pump out audio only.

  56. @anon
    "No other site can afford to be a YouTube. Videos take up a lot of storage space, and HDD’s don’t come free."

    What stops conservative Red States from banding together to publicly fund an alternative? Don't they already do this for roads and other social services? State funding along with a few a few tweaks to storage polices (a user data limit or a posted time limit for really old, unpopular vids), could reduce costs without sacrificing functionality or quality. Not to be rude, but why do conservatives lack imagination?

    Not to be rude, but why do conservatives lack imagination?

    It’s not that that they have no imagination. It’s partly that they have no guts. But it’s mostly the fact that they have no principles. They don’t do the things you’d like them to do because they’re not on your side. They’re on the side of their donors. They do what what their donors want them to do. They support the whole globohomo SJW agenda.

    What stops conservative Red States from banding together to publicly fund an alternative?

    The fact that conservatives do not want you to have an alternative. They are not on your side.

    • Replies: @jeff stryker
    DOOM


    Republicans got George Bush elected and essentially destroyed the living standard of the US with endless wars which cost trillions.
  57. @anon

    It will become a repository for cat and unpacking videos.
     
    As you said. No matter how big it seems to us, politics is minuscule part of youtube content.
    Of top YT videos, none is political.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_most-viewed_YouTube_videos

    The normies are on Youtube to listen to music and watch cat and dog videos. This is core YT audience. If YT shut down all politics left, right and center, normies would not notice at all.

    The inability to debunk false flags – or rather, to have it catch fire – may well result in avoidable wars.
     
    Did it ever worked? When was the last time when war was prevented by brave citizen journalists debunking war propaganda?
    Remember Iraq war - there was open debate on the internet, the WMD scare was thoroughly discredited, millions of people worldwide protested, and it did not mattered at all.

    The normies are on Youtube to listen to music and watch cat and dog videos.

    Don’t forget tutorials.

    “How to end-run social media censorship” could be a good one– if it gets through.

  58. @anon
    "No other site can afford to be a YouTube. Videos take up a lot of storage space, and HDD’s don’t come free."

    What stops conservative Red States from banding together to publicly fund an alternative? Don't they already do this for roads and other social services? State funding along with a few a few tweaks to storage polices (a user data limit or a posted time limit for really old, unpopular vids), could reduce costs without sacrificing functionality or quality. Not to be rude, but why do conservatives lack imagination?

    Not to be rude, but why do conservatives lack imagination?

    All the imagination on the right belongs to reactionaries. It’s been that way since Aristophanes.

  59. @dfordoom

    Not to be rude, but why do conservatives lack imagination?
     
    It's not that that they have no imagination. It's partly that they have no guts. But it's mostly the fact that they have no principles. They don't do the things you'd like them to do because they're not on your side. They're on the side of their donors. They do what what their donors want them to do. They support the whole globohomo SJW agenda.

    What stops conservative Red States from banding together to publicly fund an alternative?
     
    The fact that conservatives do not want you to have an alternative. They are not on your side.

    DOOM

    Republicans got George Bush elected and essentially destroyed the living standard of the US with endless wars which cost trillions.

    • Agree: iffen
  60. Anonymous[381] • Disclaimer says:

    (9) The one happy thing about all this is that more and more restrictions and censorship means higher quality output.

    Uh, you’re either drunk or stupid. Possibly both.

    • Replies: @onebornfree
    AK: (9) The one happy thing about all this is that more and more restrictions and censorship means higher quality output.

    Anonymous[381] • Disclaimer says: Uh, you’re either drunk or stupid. Possibly both.


    You got that right .

    Coupled with AK's :"Note that most of the greatest “subversive” literature was produced in moderately repressive ancien regimes," and "First, it weeds out the grifters – no point to grifting when you are blacklisted and deplatformed from everything."


    State censorship [Google/YouTube = CIA/NSA etc.] is good because it produces better subversive literature and weeds out those he subjectively views as "grifters" ?

    Definitely both drunk and stupid, as far as I can see :-)

    This just in: The US was not supposed to be even a "moderately repressive ancien regime". It was founded as being the exact opposite.

    [And yes, I'm fully aware that it is now no different from a "moderately repressive ancien regime", or even worse.]

    Regards onebornfree

  61. YouTube will become a repository for cat and unpacking videos.

    And soft-core porn … in this case, it is both a Kat video and an unpacking video:

    • Replies: @Kent Nationalist
    What's the point of this? Presumably the target audience for 'try-on' and 'haul' (for clothes) videos is girls. But are girls attracted by images of scantily clad women and cleavage?
  62. @jeff stryker
    Bush was a Republican and he trashed the US. No matter how you cut it, Bill Clinton's economy and quality of life was better in the nineties than when Bush was elected in the year 2000.

    So it is not just Democrats that trash the country.

    “… Bill Clinton’s economy and quality of life was better in the nineties than when Bush was elected in the year 2000.”

    You might want to re-phrase that, because it implies Clinton inherited a country with a better economy and standard of life from Bush 1 and handed a country worse off to Bush 2.

    • Replies: @jeff stryker
    Hillary Clinton would have turned the US into one giant backward socialist ghetto possibly at war with both Ukraine and Syria.

    However, Bill Clinton inherited an early nineties recession and managed to pull the US out of it fairly quickly.

    He also managed to reduce high crime rates. End a crack epidemic.

    Bill Clinton left office with a surplus budget not a deficit.
  63. @The Alarmist

    "... Bill Clinton’s economy and quality of life was better in the nineties than when Bush was elected in the year 2000."
     
    You might want to re-phrase that, because it implies Clinton inherited a country with a better economy and standard of life from Bush 1 and handed a country worse off to Bush 2.

    Hillary Clinton would have turned the US into one giant backward socialist ghetto possibly at war with both Ukraine and Syria.

    However, Bill Clinton inherited an early nineties recession and managed to pull the US out of it fairly quickly.

    He also managed to reduce high crime rates. End a crack epidemic.

    Bill Clinton left office with a surplus budget not a deficit.

    • Replies: @The Alarmist
    So, you believe everything you see and read in the MSM. I agree things were OK under WJC and only got worse under Bush 2, but the "facts" you cite have all been picked apart and somewhat debunked as being due to the salutary effect of a Bill Clinton Presidency.
    , @Twodees Partain
    Whatever good you experienced while the Clinton co-presidency was in office had nothing to do with them or anything they did. You sound as though you believe that presidents can actually control an economy and and improve a society.

    You really should stop huffing glue while you watch TV.
  64. BTW, plenty of YouTubers have direct deals with sponsors like SquareSpace, etc. As long as YT is hosting the videos, e.g. Crowder’ videos are still there, he can read a sponsor’s ad as part of his content… assuming he can get a sponsor.

    Alt-Lite likes to live on OPM without actually having to work for it.

  65. @jeff stryker
    Hillary Clinton would have turned the US into one giant backward socialist ghetto possibly at war with both Ukraine and Syria.

    However, Bill Clinton inherited an early nineties recession and managed to pull the US out of it fairly quickly.

    He also managed to reduce high crime rates. End a crack epidemic.

    Bill Clinton left office with a surplus budget not a deficit.

    So, you believe everything you see and read in the MSM. I agree things were OK under WJC and only got worse under Bush 2, but the “facts” you cite have all been picked apart and somewhat debunked as being due to the salutary effect of a Bill Clinton Presidency.

    • Agree: utu
  66. Unz should host Heartiste.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Yes! That's a great idea.
    , @Zeroh Tollrants
    Yes! I would love for Unz to host Heartiste here. Lots of young men follow his site, great way to expose them to more info.
  67. Are there still people here that seriously believe that jews are not in charge of internet censorship, if so what makes you think it’s not them?

    • Replies: @Cagey Beast
    It's not just the Jews who are pushing for internet censorship. Pretty much everyone at the top of the social pyramid want to go back to the days of mass media gate-keeping.
  68. @John Burns, Gettysburg Partisan
    They've actually de-monetized extremely innocuous stuff long before this new wave.

    For example: there are a few YouTube channels I watch that feature footage of people hunting deer and other American wild game. They show how to hunt; how to harvest the animals; and how too cook them. These videos get only a few thousand views, if that, and are not out to hurt anyone.

    But they show how to kill a deer, which was apparently bad, so YouTube de-monetized all of these guys's videos (no reason was offered, of course), which made it less worthwhile for them to make good videos.

    This is actually really, really bad. It's not just that we can't have our politics. YouTube is or was useful for people showing other people how to do practical real things. Like hunting. They're even getting rid of that stuff. Don't try and tell me they're not trying to turn us into sheep.

    Blue-haired ladies in the censorship room don’t like dat bambie killed!

    Go to the supermarket to buy meat like everyone else.

    • Replies: @John Burns, Gettysburg Partisan

    Go to the supermarket to buy meat like everyone else.

     

    Wild game tastes better and makes a boy into a man.
  69. ADL: “This is an important step forward, but must be followed by many more.”

    And when you think about it, cutting off their incomes isn’t enough. We should be literally starving these threats to Jewish power racists, sexists, Islamophobes, homophobes and assorted other haters. Cut off their food supplies! Ban them from buying so much as a baked bean. Let’s see them hate on Hymie on vulnerable communities of color when their calorie intake becomes zero. Famines for a fairer world, folks!

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holodomor

    • Replies: @LondonBob
    The ADL has been whining about the Internet for a while. They are finally making some progress, but it won't work and the genie is already out of the bottle.
    , @jeff stryker
    VIRAL


    Except that the deplorable white proles (Previously known as "peasants") have the power to cut off the food supply because they grow the food. Of course in America most of these people themselves rely on Wal-Mart, fuel and Opoid rehab centers. Still, if the farmers and truckers simply ceased transporting goods (As Reed has mentioned) to Manhattan (THEY) would be cannibals in three days.

    The same is true in UK. Food is not grown in Mayor Khan's backyard. If UK farmers cut the food supply to London for a single fortnight, that is all she wrote.

    Tacitly, this is why black rioting in the US no longer matters. People don't care if there is rioting in Baltimore or Ferguson and blacks burn down their crack houses. After a few days of this, they will simply be hungry, having burned down the local curry take out and having no agriculture, so they simply stop rioting.

    On the other hand since (THEY) are backed by the Pentagon, it is possible that the military might resort to martial law and simply seize farmer's produce. This would probably happen because officers on the East Coast beltway would also feel the effect of having middle-american deplorables cut off the food supply.
  70. @anon
    "No other site can afford to be a YouTube. Videos take up a lot of storage space, and HDD’s don’t come free."

    What stops conservative Red States from banding together to publicly fund an alternative? Don't they already do this for roads and other social services? State funding along with a few a few tweaks to storage polices (a user data limit or a posted time limit for really old, unpopular vids), could reduce costs without sacrificing functionality or quality. Not to be rude, but why do conservatives lack imagination?

    What stops conservative Red States from banding together to publicly fund an alternative?

    In the USA and all its puppet regimes (Germany, France, UK, etc) this is impossible. This is neither a technical or business problem, the politics of the land dictate what one is allowed to do, and in the US one is not free to do these things.

    Sure you can talk about “censorship is only when the government does it” nonsense, but in the US the government is simply a rubber stamping authority. What is dictated by the (((ADL))), (((Hollywood))), and the (((mass media))) is what ultimately matters, they will shut you down either by removing your advertisers, or deplatform you, remove your bank account, or even just remove your internet access at the lowest infrastructure levels.

    The solution can only be political, and at this point this means bullets in a lot heads, everything else will not work any more. As somebody already mentioned “conservatives” (really just cuckservatives) are cowards, so don’t expect too much from them.

  71. @Biff

    Second, YouTube operates on an annual loss of a billion dollars. It is something that Alphabet subsidizes for presumably political reasons.
     
    Who’s Alphabet?

    “Supiciously Bland Moniker” Company.

    They are also currently pulling in 85×10⁶ USD of profit per day.

    Always remember THAT TGIF meeting

    And what does YouTube do to have a loss of a billion dollar per year? Do they secretly manage bases under extinct volancoes? Apparently in 2012:

    If that advertising revenue is correct YouTube would be set to earn a net revenue of $2.4 billion in 2012 after paying out $1.2 billion in revenue to its various partners who create and post the videos relied on by YouTube’s platform.

    After paying, say, USD 500 million for the infrastructure, that would still leave USD 1.9×10⁹ of pure moolah.

  72. @Viral Architect
    ADL: "This is an important step forward, but must be followed by many more."

    And when you think about it, cutting off their incomes isn't enough. We should be literally starving these threats to Jewish power racists, sexists, Islamophobes, homophobes and assorted other haters. Cut off their food supplies! Ban them from buying so much as a baked bean. Let's see them hate on Hymie on vulnerable communities of color when their calorie intake becomes zero. Famines for a fairer world, folks!

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holodomor

    The ADL has been whining about the Internet for a while. They are finally making some progress, but it won’t work and the genie is already out of the bottle.

    • Replies: @jeff stryker
    LONDON


    Cases like Gary Glitter or other famous musicians being busted downloading child porn led to a resurgence in back-alley magazines and hard copy, which cannot be traced through a server.

    Possibly, it will work the same way with anything else. People will simply use other media besides the internet, which are much harder to censor or track.

    Drug dealers don't use the internet, for example. You'll never see a website for your local crack dealer.
  73. @anon
    "Trade war with China is driving this and most things. Everyone has to be on board now with the US. Wars do that."

    There are now an enormous number of high-quality anti-Chinese YouTube channels clandestinely funded by the CIA through third parties. They promote all manner of anti-Chinese conspiracy theories and even blatantly lie, stoking animus among viewers. Some of this stuff I've seen is certainly a TOS violation. However, I doubt they will be booted any time soon.

    In fact, this action by YouTube looks state-sponsored to me. YouTube initially sided with Crowder, as they should have, but then backtracked in a way that looked like they were resisting under duress: "you violated our standards, but we aren't going to tell you how, wink wink". US tech companies used to do this under the Obama regime when his secret police would come by demanding customer personal data; they'd warn customers by a subtle change in their TOS wording (i.e. get out now while you can because we're being raided).

    Under US deepstate pressure (the controlled media), RT has long been deranked on YouTube, now along with alternative opinion channels like Carl Benjamin - that after banning the guy they feel is responsible for helping Trump beat Hilary the most (Alex Jones); that despite the obvious hypocrisy since 2016: vids critical of Islam and Muslims are banned or demonetized despite YouTube permitting over a decade's worth of horribly anti-Christian videos from radical Leftists; YouTube continues to allow radical Leftists to put words like "loser" in the titles of far Leftist vids aimed at Donald Trump (they are also allowed blur his face which is dehumanizing) but have banned videos mocking Michelle Obama as being secretly transgender; racism and promotion of violence is okay on YouTube if done by CNN (endorsed antifa), TYT ("oh, you white guys" on election night 2016 + "you wanna nother war!" threatening Texas with violence), and MTV ("Dear white people"); YouTube and other social media long allow promotion of racist "white privilege" language and feminism but have cracked down on anti-feminism; ...

    I think this came from the US government. Do you think it's a coincidence they've artificially promoted "authoritative" sources, many of which are used as propaganda against policies and politicians like Trump? Do you think it's a coincidence they downranked RT and other opposition channels like PressTV? Do you think it's a coincidence they are promoting late night "comedy" propaganda, nearly all of which has a political bent favored by the elite? This is all being on purpose to build a consensus for their views. The content being banned (racial differences) also makes me think this is a state-sponsored effort at bringing stability ... and crushing government dissidents who notice the promoted narrative is logically invalid.

    Personally, I think US conservative red states would be well served by utilizing independent tech companies from China to build a state-sponsored internet alternative, including video services like YouTube. They already do so with public broadcasting, so I don't see any reason not to expand this to other technologies.

    Personally, I think US conservative red states would be well served by utilizing independent tech companies from China to build a state-sponsored internet alternative, including video services like YouTube. They already do so with public broadcasting, so I don’t see any reason not to expand this to other technologies.

    Agree with this. The problem is the centralized power of YouTube, Google etc. The defence is state funding (and political backing) for local alternatives or the break up of YouTube, Google etc. ( for example, a Texas Google under Texas political supervision).

    If the SJW’s want their safe spaces protected they can use Washington Google and Washington YouTube.

  74. @LondonBob
    The ADL has been whining about the Internet for a while. They are finally making some progress, but it won't work and the genie is already out of the bottle.

    LONDON

    Cases like Gary Glitter or other famous musicians being busted downloading child porn led to a resurgence in back-alley magazines and hard copy, which cannot be traced through a server.

    Possibly, it will work the same way with anything else. People will simply use other media besides the internet, which are much harder to censor or track.

    Drug dealers don’t use the internet, for example. You’ll never see a website for your local crack dealer.

  75. anon[211] • Disclaimer says:

    “they will shut you down either by removing your advertisers, or deplatform you, remove your bank account”

    A couple of red state legislatures couldn’t nationalize local internet infrastructure or, alternatively, work with the Chinese to build alternative infrastructure and platforms? Don’t they already fund public broadcasting, so what’s the difference? Red state legislatures couldn’t copy Chinese payment apps and cut out banks and payment processors so they couldn’t remove customer bank accounts? Red states can’t make their own cryptocurrencies? Red states couldn’t tweak the business model of a YouTube competitor to make it viable while also incentivizing creators so they don’t have to rely on advertisers (make income donated to them by viewers tax-free)? There seems to be quite a bit that could be done if one has both the imagination and the will to do so. I guess the question is, why don’t conservatives do these things? Is it that they are being prevented from doing so or have IQs really fallen that much since the early 20th century?

    • Replies: @jeff stryker
    211


    Red States rely on Federal bailouts. They are not autonomous. After all, it is their young people that volunteer-mostly out of the same economic desperation that motivates a lumpen Italian-American in North Jersey to join a "crew" and become a "soldier" for a "family"-to fight for the Pentagon in wars for (THEM).

    It is hard to get any grassroots movements going in Red States. None of these people seemingly earn as much as Blue State Democrats in academe, the media, law, journalism and so on. Red State whites will often rattle on about individualism, rugged self-reliance, freedom but then they need Fed baliotus more often than your average Blue State Democrat.

    You Tube cannot compete with the (MSM) because Red State whites never have any freaking money. Their own life choices guarantee this. They marry young because they believe sex should occur within the sanctity of marriage as oppose to with some DJ in a New York club who has offered them cocaine like the average 20 year old Blue State Democrat. They are more R-strategy (Seemingly) so have kids in their early twenties and have larger families than Blue State Democrats. Their parents tend to be poor so they have less education and less money. The exception are hicks in the oil industry. But these people have a good gig going and don't want to mouth off.

    There is preconception among the poor and lower class that wealthy and upper class care what they think. They don't. They are not interested at all, unless like Donald Trump they have enough money to get into the poker game.
    , @neutral
    I don't know how much clearer I have to make it, the US government has a much power as the North Korea peoples assembly, they are nothing more than a rubber stamping authority. This Red/Blue state thing is nonsense, it is as real as pro wrestling feuds are real. To ask a "Red state" to do something is as valid as expecting some member of the Korean peoples assembly to speak out against Kim Jong Un.
    , @Daniel Chieh
    To some extent, it goes back to a general issue of the Right as well, red states governments are not going to be generally well organized or technologically all that enabled. The mention of China is actually particularly amusing since that's of course the kind of thing that would never happen not only due to the norms of red states but also because it'll get them called traitors; yet at the same time, it was something that California actually did try to do, to run a "separate foreign polity" alone with China on some things.

    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/california-china-make-climate-deal/


    Of course, the other usual issues of Right-aligned organizations: low trust, typically not the highest levels of technical ability, etc.
  76. Anonymous[318] • Disclaimer says:
    @user_s
    Unz should host Heartiste.

    Yes! That’s a great idea.

  77. @Viral Architect
    ADL: "This is an important step forward, but must be followed by many more."

    And when you think about it, cutting off their incomes isn't enough. We should be literally starving these threats to Jewish power racists, sexists, Islamophobes, homophobes and assorted other haters. Cut off their food supplies! Ban them from buying so much as a baked bean. Let's see them hate on Hymie on vulnerable communities of color when their calorie intake becomes zero. Famines for a fairer world, folks!

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holodomor

    VIRAL

    Except that the deplorable white proles (Previously known as “peasants”) have the power to cut off the food supply because they grow the food. Of course in America most of these people themselves rely on Wal-Mart, fuel and Opoid rehab centers. Still, if the farmers and truckers simply ceased transporting goods (As Reed has mentioned) to Manhattan (THEY) would be cannibals in three days.

    The same is true in UK. Food is not grown in Mayor Khan’s backyard. If UK farmers cut the food supply to London for a single fortnight, that is all she wrote.

    Tacitly, this is why black rioting in the US no longer matters. People don’t care if there is rioting in Baltimore or Ferguson and blacks burn down their crack houses. After a few days of this, they will simply be hungry, having burned down the local curry take out and having no agriculture, so they simply stop rioting.

    On the other hand since (THEY) are backed by the Pentagon, it is possible that the military might resort to martial law and simply seize farmer’s produce. This would probably happen because officers on the East Coast beltway would also feel the effect of having middle-american deplorables cut off the food supply.

    • Replies: @Hyperborean
    Even if the farmers could manage this, the government would simply import food from abroad until they crushed the rebellion.
    , @Jaakko Raipala

    Except that the deplorable white proles (Previously known as “peasants”) have the power to cut off the food supply because they grow the food.
     
    That worked out really well for the kulaks.
  78. @peterAUS
    Khm....ahm....you know...perhaps....."we" could take a look at how people working against Communist regimes, especially Soviet Union/Warsaw Pact managed collaborating, exchanging ideas and similar stuff.

    True, that would, unfortunately, unearth some, how to put it, fundamental problems the alternative is facing today but let's skip over it at the moment.

    Personally, I am looking forward to the time when all productive chat will be possible between TWO guys who trust each other, somewhere in public. Beach, park, places like that. Brief chat and to the point.
    Old fashion, I know.....
    Relic from era when it worked. When the men were serious and meant business.

    Not quite sure we can have such men anymore.
    The world has changed. Not quite sure for better in that regards.

    ”we” could take a look at how people working against Communist regimes, especially Soviet Union/Warsaw Pact managed collaborating, exchanging ideas and similar stuff.

    Sounds like a plan but.

    The big difference that I can see is that the “freedom fighters” against communism could count upon the allegiance of a large % of the population and the acquiescence of an even larger %. I don’t see that happening for the benefit of the “freedom fighters” conglomerated here.

    • Replies: @jeff stryker
    IFFEN


    Do you think most African-Americans or Mexicans would support Red State whites who want to reduce Federal taxes, cancel out Section 8, remove EBT and cut government spending on programs that give blacks or other minorities Affirmative Action jobs?

    Do you really think Jews, blacks, Mexicans and Asians have the same homesteading mentality as heritage Americans who live in a Red State? Is this is even a question a four year old would not have the answer to?

    Why do you think Jews, blacks, Mexicans and Asians live on the coast? Diversified economy. Money. Glorified poker games on Wall Street or IT stuff. None of these people are involved in primary economies like Red States are.

    The idea these "masses" would support freedom fighters running around the Ozarks or Montana is absurd.

    A good number of blacks would join the military if it declared martial law on these "freedom fighters" merely so they could storm the houses of farmers in Red States and rape their daughters. You think some politician like Octavio who is Latino is going to hesitate in ordering her National Guard troops to declare martial law. State governors in New Mexico might withdraw their troops from the border but they will happily massacre a Red State white rural "resistance". Black and Hispanic NCO's would tell their infantry "You may rape, but discreetly" and then you would see war crimes visited on white rural women unseen since Russians invaded Germany in World War II.

    The entire Red State idiom runs against what urban Blue States believe in-Mexicans, Italian-Americans on the East Coast, Hindus, Jews, blacks, Muslims are all tribal/extended clan mentalities who cannot relate to Clint Eastwood and John Wayne attitudes about "freedom" and "individualism" and "self-reliance". If you have not noticed, Democrats want gun control.

    So there is no support for resistance fighters. Blacks and Mestizos and Jews and Asians who like big government are not going get behind that.
  79. @anon
    "they will shut you down either by removing your advertisers, or deplatform you, remove your bank account"

    A couple of red state legislatures couldn't nationalize local internet infrastructure or, alternatively, work with the Chinese to build alternative infrastructure and platforms? Don't they already fund public broadcasting, so what's the difference? Red state legislatures couldn't copy Chinese payment apps and cut out banks and payment processors so they couldn't remove customer bank accounts? Red states can't make their own cryptocurrencies? Red states couldn't tweak the business model of a YouTube competitor to make it viable while also incentivizing creators so they don't have to rely on advertisers (make income donated to them by viewers tax-free)? There seems to be quite a bit that could be done if one has both the imagination and the will to do so. I guess the question is, why don't conservatives do these things? Is it that they are being prevented from doing so or have IQs really fallen that much since the early 20th century?

    211

    Red States rely on Federal bailouts. They are not autonomous. After all, it is their young people that volunteer-mostly out of the same economic desperation that motivates a lumpen Italian-American in North Jersey to join a “crew” and become a “soldier” for a “family”-to fight for the Pentagon in wars for (THEM).

    It is hard to get any grassroots movements going in Red States. None of these people seemingly earn as much as Blue State Democrats in academe, the media, law, journalism and so on. Red State whites will often rattle on about individualism, rugged self-reliance, freedom but then they need Fed baliotus more often than your average Blue State Democrat.

    You Tube cannot compete with the (MSM) because Red State whites never have any freaking money. Their own life choices guarantee this. They marry young because they believe sex should occur within the sanctity of marriage as oppose to with some DJ in a New York club who has offered them cocaine like the average 20 year old Blue State Democrat. They are more R-strategy (Seemingly) so have kids in their early twenties and have larger families than Blue State Democrats. Their parents tend to be poor so they have less education and less money. The exception are hicks in the oil industry. But these people have a good gig going and don’t want to mouth off.

    There is preconception among the poor and lower class that wealthy and upper class care what they think. They don’t. They are not interested at all, unless like Donald Trump they have enough money to get into the poker game.

    • Troll: Fuerchtegott
  80. @E. Harding
    What is the social aspect of YouTube? What are YouTube's network effects? I absolutely get why getting kicked off Twitter or Facebook is disastrous. But can't websites just host their own videos?

    Also, YouTube has been flaky since... forever. Creators have long had complaints about its reporting system.

    But can’t websites just host their own videos?

    That’s how things used to be done. Hosting rates now are a lot more affordable too. Most podcasts are still hosted by their creators.

    People have just got lazy with youtube and enticed by it’s huge viewer counts. Much of that viewer count is really inaccessible anyway since youtube can promote any video it wants. The sheer number of videos out there means it’s real easy to get lost in the crowd.

    • Replies: @SimpleSong
    Does anybody have any recommendations or thoughts on good hosts/registrars that are politically agnostic? IIRC didn't Anglin actually have both his domain name seized and his hosting terminated? To me, that is much scarier than youtube or twitter demonetizing--what are you supposed to do about that, build your own internet?

    WRT video, it seems like it would make more sense to host your own bare bones text/images site on a cheap host, load videos to bitchute, and provide links to the videos, rather than getting a video hosting plan.

    That leaves the question of monetization. Soliciting donations is an option but there's certainly a ceiling to that. Something like adwords is a non-starter, obviously. You could solicit for ads on the site. Much more labor intensive, but on the other hand safer from demonetization. I actually could see people in mail order businesses that are very crowded, who have no other way to distinguish themselves, advertising on sites like this. I'm being serious--one of my neighbors was in a business like this and he said that for these sorts of crowded marketplaces the ROI for keyword advertising on google was zero--they basically sucked every last penny of value out of you. So someone like him, without a lot of options, might be willing to advertise on a site like that, particularly if there is a good fit with the demographic. Alex Jones seems to be doing this with supplements but I could see it working for other things.

    Anyway its a long row to hoe but not impossible.
  81. anon[855] • Disclaimer says:

    “it would have been even nicer if you hadn’t gone crazy and doxed your own people.”

    Yep. The alt-right was self-sabotaged by people who lack any discernible tact, professionalism, or ability to strategize. Any future resistance movement needs to be broad-based to prevent any one person from screwing it up for the rest.

    “Conservatives aren’t on your side.”

    Yep. Guys like David French and his NRO are paid by tech companies (government proxies) to tell their constituents that they are entitled* to think they should be allowed access to a de facto monopoly that sets political discourse and determines election results. My, how “entitled” those people are. The purpose is obviously to prevent the masses from doing anything that allows them an actual voice in shaping policy, and sell out losers like French are part of it.

    *This is the same word used by extreme left-wing outlets to describe game customers who don’t want Leftist propaganda in their games, so the guy has revealed what circles he really runs in.

  82. Telling for a friend…

    Build your own platforms, then you won’t have these issues. Free speech was reserved to citizens fighting against government intrusion, not private entities. Internet companies can do what they want with their property, right? Isn’t that a sacred pillar of capitalism?

    • Replies: @reiner Tor
    It’s a natural monopoly, and monopolies are normally not free to abuse their monopoly powers. And of course monopolies abusing their power is not a “sacred pillar of capitalism.”
    , @neutral

    Isn’t that a sacred pillar of capitalism?
     
    I think that you are still thinking using the establishment narrative that "conservatives" are supposed to be capitalists and liberals are more concerned about the worker. This was always a fake narrative, but now hardly anybody pretends to even follow this fakeness. The left are all about being anti white, they care nothing about workers, they very openly support woke corporations that crush white people speaking out.

    The only ones that still support capitalism are fake conservatives, that despite all the evidence, still support corporations, the same corporations that are destroying conservatives.

    , @onebornfree
    Corvinus says:"Internet companies can do what they want with their property, right? Isn’t that a sacred pillar of capitalism?"

    Why yes, except for the inconvenient fact that Google/Youtube is not a private company that can [therefor] censor any content it does not like.

    If you dig a little, you'll discover that Google is a CIA funded creation. Always has been, always will be. Same goes for Amazon [ probably Facebook Twitter, and others too].

    "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances"

    Regards, onebornfree

  83. @John Burns, Gettysburg Partisan
    They've actually de-monetized extremely innocuous stuff long before this new wave.

    For example: there are a few YouTube channels I watch that feature footage of people hunting deer and other American wild game. They show how to hunt; how to harvest the animals; and how too cook them. These videos get only a few thousand views, if that, and are not out to hurt anyone.

    But they show how to kill a deer, which was apparently bad, so YouTube de-monetized all of these guys's videos (no reason was offered, of course), which made it less worthwhile for them to make good videos.

    This is actually really, really bad. It's not just that we can't have our politics. YouTube is or was useful for people showing other people how to do practical real things. Like hunting. They're even getting rid of that stuff. Don't try and tell me they're not trying to turn us into sheep.

    Don’t try and tell me they’re not trying to turn us into sheep.

    They don’t have to; we are natural born sheep. The Borg is the border collie that prevents anyone from breaking away and causing a herd breakup.

  84. @Anatoly Karlin

    What are YouTube’s network effects?
     
    Recommendations. You get vast numbers of new people getting funneled onto your channel e.g. you watch Molyneux --> JF Gariepy.

    Viewership is systemically higher than for similar profile blogs by up to an order of magnitude. For instance, the typical video by the psychometrist Edward Dutton – probably the most high profile HBD vlogger – gets around 10,000-20,000 views. I am reasonably sure that this is well above what the typical article by James Thompson here gets. My most popular “HBD” article ever – The Idiocy of the Average – got something like 40,000 views if I remember correctly. The Golden One, a Swedish alt right pagan bodybuilder, has 100,000 subscribers, and most of his videos – rather low effort productions with minimal editing or effects – get at least 20,000 views.

    The Alt Right child prodigy “soph” – recently profiled by Mr. Bernstein – is currently just shy of a million subscribers on YouTube. She has had 17 million views since she started her (rather irregular) vlogging career in August 2015. That’s approximately what the Unz Review currently generates in half a year, and we have far, far more visitors now than even just a couple of years ago.

    But can’t websites just host their own videos?
     
    I have no experience with this, but AFAIK hosting videos yourself is more complicated than with just a text/image blog. You'll need to get your own hosting, you generally can't do that on outside platforms, not for free anyway (e.g. on Wordpress.com you need to buy video hosting and its quite costly). Now I recommend self hosting + regular backups anyway for any dissident these days anyway, I am amazed that Heartiste largely neglected that. But AFAIK with video bandwidth usage becomes a major constraint so it can get expensive fast.

    The first problem with video is hosting costs, I would say. Disk and bandwidth costs. Media players no longer a problem. Storing the video in the cloud can be problematic since the cloud is owned by Amazon, Google and Microsoft. BitChute using torrents is the way I would go too. The second problem is discovery/search. The third problem is monetization, which might get difficult since the financial system seems increasingly poz. Also, getting a good mobile experience can be hard if you can’t get into the app stores.

    Someone suggested uploading to porn sites instead, which is a funny idea and might work for a while. But even if it does, I think that business is mostly run by the Porn-Jew, so it ultimately has the same problems.

    On the bright side, you won’t have to compete with YouTube-size investments out of the gate. It will still require some money to run, though. Good luck attracting and monetizing those eyeballs.

  85. @anon
    "they will shut you down either by removing your advertisers, or deplatform you, remove your bank account"

    A couple of red state legislatures couldn't nationalize local internet infrastructure or, alternatively, work with the Chinese to build alternative infrastructure and platforms? Don't they already fund public broadcasting, so what's the difference? Red state legislatures couldn't copy Chinese payment apps and cut out banks and payment processors so they couldn't remove customer bank accounts? Red states can't make their own cryptocurrencies? Red states couldn't tweak the business model of a YouTube competitor to make it viable while also incentivizing creators so they don't have to rely on advertisers (make income donated to them by viewers tax-free)? There seems to be quite a bit that could be done if one has both the imagination and the will to do so. I guess the question is, why don't conservatives do these things? Is it that they are being prevented from doing so or have IQs really fallen that much since the early 20th century?

    I don’t know how much clearer I have to make it, the US government has a much power as the North Korea peoples assembly, they are nothing more than a rubber stamping authority. This Red/Blue state thing is nonsense, it is as real as pro wrestling feuds are real. To ask a “Red state” to do something is as valid as expecting some member of the Korean peoples assembly to speak out against Kim Jong Un.

    • Agree: Robjil, Kratoklastes
  86. @iffen
    ”we” could take a look at how people working against Communist regimes, especially Soviet Union/Warsaw Pact managed collaborating, exchanging ideas and similar stuff.

    Sounds like a plan but.

    The big difference that I can see is that the "freedom fighters" against communism could count upon the allegiance of a large % of the population and the acquiescence of an even larger %. I don't see that happening for the benefit of the "freedom fighters" conglomerated here.

    IFFEN

    Do you think most African-Americans or Mexicans would support Red State whites who want to reduce Federal taxes, cancel out Section 8, remove EBT and cut government spending on programs that give blacks or other minorities Affirmative Action jobs?

    Do you really think Jews, blacks, Mexicans and Asians have the same homesteading mentality as heritage Americans who live in a Red State? Is this is even a question a four year old would not have the answer to?

    Why do you think Jews, blacks, Mexicans and Asians live on the coast? Diversified economy. Money. Glorified poker games on Wall Street or IT stuff. None of these people are involved in primary economies like Red States are.

    The idea these “masses” would support freedom fighters running around the Ozarks or Montana is absurd.

    A good number of blacks would join the military if it declared martial law on these “freedom fighters” merely so they could storm the houses of farmers in Red States and rape their daughters. You think some politician like Octavio who is Latino is going to hesitate in ordering her National Guard troops to declare martial law. State governors in New Mexico might withdraw their troops from the border but they will happily massacre a Red State white rural “resistance”. Black and Hispanic NCO’s would tell their infantry “You may rape, but discreetly” and then you would see war crimes visited on white rural women unseen since Russians invaded Germany in World War II.

    The entire Red State idiom runs against what urban Blue States believe in-Mexicans, Italian-Americans on the East Coast, Hindus, Jews, blacks, Muslims are all tribal/extended clan mentalities who cannot relate to Clint Eastwood and John Wayne attitudes about “freedom” and “individualism” and “self-reliance”. If you have not noticed, Democrats want gun control.

    So there is no support for resistance fighters. Blacks and Mestizos and Jews and Asians who like big government are not going get behind that.

    • Replies: @iffen
    So there is no support for resistance fighters.

    This was my point. It is what I wrote.
    , @Jake
    I think everything you write is the truth and that the smart Liberals know that and are doing all they can to bring this slaughter to fruition.

    Now, we are all about to be revealed as just like Palestinians. Now, they are revealed to be Cromwell, and we are the Irish Catholics that Cromwell intends to send to Hell or Connaught.

    And our mainstream 'conservative' leaders are just like Ulstermen, who always have been more than willing, who always itch, to do all the dirty work of the Elites, and then allow themselves to be shit on by those Elites, time after time after every time.

    This quote I found thought provoking: "Black and Hispanic NCO’s would tell their infantry “You may rape, but discreetly” and then you would see war crimes visited on white rural women unseen since Russians invaded Germany in World War II."

    It made me wonder about the fact that on average, Germans from East Germany have better common sense about such matters than do Germans from West Germany. We should know that American and Brit troops, usually with payment, had their way millions of times with German women and would have fathered thousands of children. We also should know that Jews rampaged across the parts of Germany controlled by the US, UK, and France, raping multitudes and bribing even more into prostitution. Those Jews also would have produced large numbers of bastards on West German women.

    Is there any possible meaning that could be discerned from these events and what we see today?
    , @Rich
    I don't think Jews end up with the blacks and/or the Mexicans. Jews in the US are a pale-skinned people and neither a skull cap nor a curly beard is going to change that. Here in NYC, all the "anti-Semitic " attacks being carried out against Jews have been by blacks and Hispanics. The media, the NYPD, and the politicians try to hide these facts, but there are too many security camera and phone videos to keep it under wraps. The Jews will either stand with other White skinned people, or be wiped out in any real race war.
    , @Chris Mallory
    Are you really that much of a cowardly cuck that you are afraid of an army of blacks and Mexicans? Black and Mexicans hate each other. You really think they will ally together?
    Remember, Jeffy boy, you are the one who ran off to Asia because you were too afraid to walk the streets in the USA.

    When we want your opinion on the military might of the black population, we will go out back and look for a cow pie.
    , @NobodyKnowsImADog
    You're actually scared of black troops?

    https://invidio.us/watch?v=pugNaCZ1RR8

    https://invidio.us/watch?v=RUSIs9K2Vls
  87. @anon
    "No other site can afford to be a YouTube. Videos take up a lot of storage space, and HDD’s don’t come free."

    What stops conservative Red States from banding together to publicly fund an alternative? Don't they already do this for roads and other social services? State funding along with a few a few tweaks to storage polices (a user data limit or a posted time limit for really old, unpopular vids), could reduce costs without sacrificing functionality or quality. Not to be rude, but why do conservatives lack imagination?

    but why do conservatives lack imagination?

    Because the basic impulse is to keep everything the way it is right now. No need to think about a “better” way.

    • Replies: @Matra
    One sees this in other aspects of their lives too: the culture/entertainment they consume - and I think consume is the right word; their holiday choices - Spanish/Florida beaches, Vegas, package tours, etc; a preference for familiar chain restaurants and stores that are advertised on TV. In general they are parochial and incurious, characteristics related to lack of imagination.
  88. I am assuming that Trump is continuing to monitor censorship… all the way to losing in 2020 and going to prison soon afterwards.

    Exactly. Just like he continues to monitor the border and monitor the wars in the Middle East.

    The only good thing that will happen with his monitoring is that he will lose in 2020 and pay a personal price for his treachery.

    Where is Kris Kobach?

  89. @Corvinus
    Telling for a friend...

    Build your own platforms, then you won't have these issues. Free speech was reserved to citizens fighting against government intrusion, not private entities. Internet companies can do what they want with their property, right? Isn't that a sacred pillar of capitalism?

    It’s a natural monopoly, and monopolies are normally not free to abuse their monopoly powers. And of course monopolies abusing their power is not a “sacred pillar of capitalism.”

    • Agree: Miro23
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "It’s a natural monopoly, and monopolies are normally not free to abuse their monopoly powers.

    Except there are ways for people to use the Internet to freely state their opinion without having to go through Facebook and Twitter. Those companies are but one avenue. A person is choosing to use those specific platforms to express their opinions.

    "And of course monopolies abusing their power is not a “sacred pillar of capitalism.”"

    That's not what I directly nor indirectly stated.

    I have no problem if the government breaks up Big Tech. But free speech historically is the protection of people against government interference, not business interference.
  90. @jeff stryker
    IFFEN


    Do you think most African-Americans or Mexicans would support Red State whites who want to reduce Federal taxes, cancel out Section 8, remove EBT and cut government spending on programs that give blacks or other minorities Affirmative Action jobs?

    Do you really think Jews, blacks, Mexicans and Asians have the same homesteading mentality as heritage Americans who live in a Red State? Is this is even a question a four year old would not have the answer to?

    Why do you think Jews, blacks, Mexicans and Asians live on the coast? Diversified economy. Money. Glorified poker games on Wall Street or IT stuff. None of these people are involved in primary economies like Red States are.

    The idea these "masses" would support freedom fighters running around the Ozarks or Montana is absurd.

    A good number of blacks would join the military if it declared martial law on these "freedom fighters" merely so they could storm the houses of farmers in Red States and rape their daughters. You think some politician like Octavio who is Latino is going to hesitate in ordering her National Guard troops to declare martial law. State governors in New Mexico might withdraw their troops from the border but they will happily massacre a Red State white rural "resistance". Black and Hispanic NCO's would tell their infantry "You may rape, but discreetly" and then you would see war crimes visited on white rural women unseen since Russians invaded Germany in World War II.

    The entire Red State idiom runs against what urban Blue States believe in-Mexicans, Italian-Americans on the East Coast, Hindus, Jews, blacks, Muslims are all tribal/extended clan mentalities who cannot relate to Clint Eastwood and John Wayne attitudes about "freedom" and "individualism" and "self-reliance". If you have not noticed, Democrats want gun control.

    So there is no support for resistance fighters. Blacks and Mestizos and Jews and Asians who like big government are not going get behind that.

    So there is no support for resistance fighters.

    This was my point. It is what I wrote.

  91. Just make your video into parody and it wont get banned

  92. @The Alarmist

    YouTube will become a repository for cat and unpacking videos.
     
    And soft-core porn ... in this case, it is both a Kat video and an unpacking video:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X5nI2E44V5E

    What’s the point of this? Presumably the target audience for ‘try-on’ and ‘haul’ (for clothes) videos is girls. But are girls attracted by images of scantily clad women and cleavage?

    • Replies: @The Alarmist
    She also has in addition to her various social media outlets a long list of patrons, the vast majority of whom seem to be men. The girls watch for the clothing ideas, the boys for the candy.

    Point being for the Alt-light that they need to develop multiple streams of income not entirely dependent on the benevolence of one corporate plantation master.
  93. @neutral
    Are there still people here that seriously believe that jews are not in charge of internet censorship, if so what makes you think it's not them?

    It’s not just the Jews who are pushing for internet censorship. Pretty much everyone at the top of the social pyramid want to go back to the days of mass media gate-keeping.

    • Replies: @onebornfree
    Cagey Beast says: "It’s not just the Jews who are pushing for internet censorship. Pretty much everyone at the top of the social pyramid want to go back to the days of mass media gate-keeping."

    Including the dim-witted author of this article [although I assume he's not even "at the top of the social pyramid"].

    Regards, onebornfree
  94. @jimmyriddle
    The Russian authorities and the YouTube censors are both prioritising popular dissident content.

    So, the Russians leave English language conent alone.

    And YT don't bother a channel like Brother Nathaniel (whose entire output consists of "What can I blame the Jews for, today?"). Instead, they go after centre-right anti-globalists like Sargon and Crowder.

    jimmyriddle—YouTube does bother Brother Nathanael. From his recent video, Soldier Boy:

    YouTube has censored probably most of my videos. Last week over a 20 minute period, I got 154 notices that YouTube believes in the ‘principles of free speech’. Doesn’t say the First Amendment, but ‘principles of free speech’. And then the big ‘Howwweeeever’. Do you realize they censored my religious video, Messiah Came to Conquer Death, because it’s offensive? Well, who is it offensive to, huh? A little tiny minority that thinks they rule it all.

    • Replies: @jimmyriddle
    Ah well, I guess he popped-up on their radar somehow.

    But he had a pretty good run, considering the type of content he produces. Channels with far more innocuous fare were zapped before him.

  95. Operation Overlord 2019 – 6 month 6 day 6 hour – 666 day.

    Operation Overlord 1944 – 6 month 6 day 6 hour.

    The 2019 666 Operation Overland was an attack on the little people/citizens of the world.

    Somethings never change.

    Our Overlords want the power to rule us with impunity.

    No back talk is allowed.

  96. @Anatoly Karlin

    What are YouTube’s network effects?
     
    Recommendations. You get vast numbers of new people getting funneled onto your channel e.g. you watch Molyneux --> JF Gariepy.

    Viewership is systemically higher than for similar profile blogs by up to an order of magnitude. For instance, the typical video by the psychometrist Edward Dutton – probably the most high profile HBD vlogger – gets around 10,000-20,000 views. I am reasonably sure that this is well above what the typical article by James Thompson here gets. My most popular “HBD” article ever – The Idiocy of the Average – got something like 40,000 views if I remember correctly. The Golden One, a Swedish alt right pagan bodybuilder, has 100,000 subscribers, and most of his videos – rather low effort productions with minimal editing or effects – get at least 20,000 views.

    The Alt Right child prodigy “soph” – recently profiled by Mr. Bernstein – is currently just shy of a million subscribers on YouTube. She has had 17 million views since she started her (rather irregular) vlogging career in August 2015. That’s approximately what the Unz Review currently generates in half a year, and we have far, far more visitors now than even just a couple of years ago.

    But can’t websites just host their own videos?
     
    I have no experience with this, but AFAIK hosting videos yourself is more complicated than with just a text/image blog. You'll need to get your own hosting, you generally can't do that on outside platforms, not for free anyway (e.g. on Wordpress.com you need to buy video hosting and its quite costly). Now I recommend self hosting + regular backups anyway for any dissident these days anyway, I am amazed that Heartiste largely neglected that. But AFAIK with video bandwidth usage becomes a major constraint so it can get expensive fast.

    What about Vimeo? I sometimes hear that mooted as an alternative to YouTube.

  97. Have any of the high IQ idiotic Libertarians awakened to the fact that Big Business is not only not the answer but that it is necessary for the State to maximize tyranny?

    • Replies: @iffen
    Have any of the high IQ idiotic Libertarians awakened

    The high end has, but the low end is still libertarian.
  98. Yes, it could be a prelude to war with Christian Russia and Shia Muslim Iran.

    Once homo marriage was legalized….it was onto homo pederasts in the Boy Scouts….gender-free maternity clinics….Satanic Looking Tranny Freaks reading books to 4 year olds in Public Libraries….

    Comet Pizza Global Homo is on rampage!!!…There is no going back for them….or should I say “IT”(Democrat Steven King is known pedophile…)

    How will the BIG WAR with Christian Russian and Shia Muslim Iran start?….Probably by accident….it will just happen…..One side will just bump into the other….at this point in time, that’s all it will take…….

    How do you say in Russia:”America is in a deep state of moral and spiritual rot………rot….rot…rot……and more rot….”…………..Blame JFK and the Beattles…..The Stones….The Who……Monty Python………..Beyoncé but…..tocks……

    • Replies: @War for Blair Mountain
    Anatoly

    How PROPHETIC was I this morning!!!....I just saw the video:Russian Navy ship...US homo Navy ship almost slammed into each other......

    What is really scary about this is that when two Navy Ships slide by each other very close.....physics kicks in...in a nasty way.....a macroscopic “Van Wal Der Force” kicks in that pulls the two large ships together......a macroscopic version of the Casmir Force in quantum mechanics........

    We almost had fucking nuclear WW3 TODAY...everyone go look at the video today.....Nuclear War because Donald Trump and PEDERAST Pete TOWNSHEND want to impose global homo on Christian Russia and Shia Muslim Iran.....


    Nuclear War 3 is just a fender bender away....

  99. @Anonymous

    (9) The one happy thing about all this is that more and more restrictions and censorship means higher quality output.
     
    Uh, you're either drunk or stupid. Possibly both.

    AK: (9) The one happy thing about all this is that more and more restrictions and censorship means higher quality output.

    Anonymous[381] • Disclaimer says: Uh, you’re either drunk or stupid. Possibly both.

    You got that right .

    Coupled with AK’s :”Note that most of the greatest “subversive” literature was produced in moderately repressive ancien regimes,” and “First, it weeds out the grifters – no point to grifting when you are blacklisted and deplatformed from everything.”

    State censorship [Google/YouTube = CIA/NSA etc.] is good because it produces better subversive literature and weeds out those he subjectively views as “grifters” ?

    Definitely both drunk and stupid, as far as I can see 🙂

    This just in: The US was not supposed to be even a “moderately repressive ancien regime”. It was founded as being the exact opposite.

    [And yes, I’m fully aware that it is now no different from a “moderately repressive ancien regime”, or even worse.]

    Regards onebornfree

    • Replies: @WHAT
    Nonargument, lol. Proper art is always created within boundaries, without boundaries all you get is piss christ and vagene monologues.

    Same with political copy.
    , @DJS
    Who cares about how the US was founded? It's been a while since the Founding Fathers have gone.

    In any event, if you want me to believe you are attached to their values, you need to show me that you are wearing clothes just like theirs. If you can't stick to simple things like length of a shirt, in era when everyone is free to wear whatever clothes they want, how can I trust you are attached to the Founding Fathers vision and values on more complex issues, like Occupation of Porto Rico, Annexation of Hawaii, District of Columbia v. Clawans, or abortion?
  100. @jeff stryker
    IFFEN


    Do you think most African-Americans or Mexicans would support Red State whites who want to reduce Federal taxes, cancel out Section 8, remove EBT and cut government spending on programs that give blacks or other minorities Affirmative Action jobs?

    Do you really think Jews, blacks, Mexicans and Asians have the same homesteading mentality as heritage Americans who live in a Red State? Is this is even a question a four year old would not have the answer to?

    Why do you think Jews, blacks, Mexicans and Asians live on the coast? Diversified economy. Money. Glorified poker games on Wall Street or IT stuff. None of these people are involved in primary economies like Red States are.

    The idea these "masses" would support freedom fighters running around the Ozarks or Montana is absurd.

    A good number of blacks would join the military if it declared martial law on these "freedom fighters" merely so they could storm the houses of farmers in Red States and rape their daughters. You think some politician like Octavio who is Latino is going to hesitate in ordering her National Guard troops to declare martial law. State governors in New Mexico might withdraw their troops from the border but they will happily massacre a Red State white rural "resistance". Black and Hispanic NCO's would tell their infantry "You may rape, but discreetly" and then you would see war crimes visited on white rural women unseen since Russians invaded Germany in World War II.

    The entire Red State idiom runs against what urban Blue States believe in-Mexicans, Italian-Americans on the East Coast, Hindus, Jews, blacks, Muslims are all tribal/extended clan mentalities who cannot relate to Clint Eastwood and John Wayne attitudes about "freedom" and "individualism" and "self-reliance". If you have not noticed, Democrats want gun control.

    So there is no support for resistance fighters. Blacks and Mestizos and Jews and Asians who like big government are not going get behind that.

    I think everything you write is the truth and that the smart Liberals know that and are doing all they can to bring this slaughter to fruition.

    Now, we are all about to be revealed as just like Palestinians. Now, they are revealed to be Cromwell, and we are the Irish Catholics that Cromwell intends to send to Hell or Connaught.

    And our mainstream ‘conservative’ leaders are just like Ulstermen, who always have been more than willing, who always itch, to do all the dirty work of the Elites, and then allow themselves to be shit on by those Elites, time after time after every time.

    This quote I found thought provoking: “Black and Hispanic NCO’s would tell their infantry “You may rape, but discreetly” and then you would see war crimes visited on white rural women unseen since Russians invaded Germany in World War II.”

    It made me wonder about the fact that on average, Germans from East Germany have better common sense about such matters than do Germans from West Germany. We should know that American and Brit troops, usually with payment, had their way millions of times with German women and would have fathered thousands of children. We also should know that Jews rampaged across the parts of Germany controlled by the US, UK, and France, raping multitudes and bribing even more into prostitution. Those Jews also would have produced large numbers of bastards on West German women.

    Is there any possible meaning that could be discerned from these events and what we see today?

    • Replies: @jeff stryker
    Look at the Amazon Indians in the Brazilian rain forests. When Hispanic governments/businesses want to log or mine, they simply order the military to shoot the Amazonian Indians.

    When America becomes Brazil pt 2, same thing for rural white resistors.

    The reality is that Red States have no power. As far as Jews on Wall Street, Hispanics in their barrios and machete-worshiping drug cartels, blacks in the hood and felch-breath gays are concerned Red State whites are only good for handing over things like toilet paper from forestry or breakfast cereal.

    None of them give a fat rat's ass how Red State rural whites feel.
  101. The Ergodic Hypothesis:What goes around…comes around…infinitely often…

    Well now, that’s a scary thought….isn’t it?…….Comet Pizza Global Homo….infinitely often….this would mean that the Universe is innately evil……Perhaps the Universe needs to be destroyed…….Has Frank Tipler ever considered this possibility?

    • Replies: @War for Blair Mountain
    Just as scary......the ugly Sheboon face of Condeleeza Rice yapping about the negro MLK...followed by thermonuclear threats against Christian Russia....to the “music” of Beyoncé farting in the general direction of Christian Russia during the SUPERBOWL HALFTIME SHOW....followed HINDU-JAMAICA POTUS KAMALA HARRIS...launching the nukes in the general direction of Christian Russia..............

    America has become a nasty smelly NEGRO FART JOKE................INFINITELY OFTEN....converging to the NEGRO FART JOKE AMERICA.....
    , @War for Blair Mountain
    Just as scary......the ugly Sheboon face of Condeleeza Rice yapping about the negro MLK...followed by thermonuclear threats against Christian Russia....to the “music” of Beyoncé farting in the general direction of Christian Russia during the SUPERBOWL HALFTIME SHOW....followed HINDU-JAMAICA POTUS KAMALA HARRIS...launching the nukes in the general direction of Christian Russia..............

    America has become a nasty smelly NEGRO FART JOKE................INFINITELY OFTEN....converging to the NEGRO FART JOKE AMERICA.....
  102. @anon
    "they will shut you down either by removing your advertisers, or deplatform you, remove your bank account"

    A couple of red state legislatures couldn't nationalize local internet infrastructure or, alternatively, work with the Chinese to build alternative infrastructure and platforms? Don't they already fund public broadcasting, so what's the difference? Red state legislatures couldn't copy Chinese payment apps and cut out banks and payment processors so they couldn't remove customer bank accounts? Red states can't make their own cryptocurrencies? Red states couldn't tweak the business model of a YouTube competitor to make it viable while also incentivizing creators so they don't have to rely on advertisers (make income donated to them by viewers tax-free)? There seems to be quite a bit that could be done if one has both the imagination and the will to do so. I guess the question is, why don't conservatives do these things? Is it that they are being prevented from doing so or have IQs really fallen that much since the early 20th century?

    To some extent, it goes back to a general issue of the Right as well, red states governments are not going to be generally well organized or technologically all that enabled. The mention of China is actually particularly amusing since that’s of course the kind of thing that would never happen not only due to the norms of red states but also because it’ll get them called traitors; yet at the same time, it was something that California actually did try to do, to run a “separate foreign polity” alone with China on some things.

    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/california-china-make-climate-deal/

    Of course, the other usual issues of Right-aligned organizations: low trust, typically not the highest levels of technical ability, etc.

  103. @216
    The only solution that I think is lasting is nationalization.

    Google, Apple, Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter, Amazon.

    Uncucked red states should consider a "sovereign Internet".

    We first need a nation (a natal, birth-related group) before we can nationalize anything. The US is not a nation anymore, but a mulikulti empire expressly set against nationalism.

    • Replies: @Jake
    That was true of the Brit WASP Empire no later than the 18th century. The nationalism of what people like Chesterton called 'Little England' was despised too, just not as much as Irish or Scottish nationalism. The Brit WASP Empire also murdered almost all of what made 'Little England' worthwhile.
  104. This just in:

    Google/YouTube = CIA/NSA [and probably other at present unknown criminal arms of the criminal US gov., as well as foreign governments, eg China and the EU.]

    This also just in:

    “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1st_amendment

    Wake up, Mr Karlin!

    No regards, onebornfree

    • Replies: @Anonymoose
    Your a faggot. Curl your hands into a fist and thrust punch them right up your butthole.

    Fuck your regards,

    onebornfree
  105. @Jake
    Have any of the high IQ idiotic Libertarians awakened to the fact that Big Business is not only not the answer but that it is necessary for the State to maximize tyranny?

    Have any of the high IQ idiotic Libertarians awakened

    The high end has, but the low end is still libertarian.

  106. @prime noticer
    this site will be gone within 1 or 2 years of trump leaving office.

    so enjoy bashing trump while you can, for not being the perfect president. yep, it sucks he's failed on some issues. been good on other issues. best course of action as always is to continue to press him to deliver. he's the only option, so keep holding his feet to the fire. worst course of action by far is bitterly posting about how MAGA was a mistake and hoping for him to be gone. it just makes you sound like a 12 year old complaining because he didn't get everything he wanted for christmas. wah wah, my expectations were unrealistic, he was supposed to turn around 70 years of jewish country destruction in 2 years.

    things will go straight downhill under the next democrat president. that will have a silver lining. at least i won't have to hear fringe rightists continuously bash one of the few republican presidents to actually try, even if he didn't deliver on all fronts. instead, there will be a relaxing silence, as all the rightists bashing trump get exactly what they've been hoping for, good and hard.

    Yep, it sucks he’s failed on some issues. been good on other issues. best course of action as always is to continue to press him to deliver.

    Trump failed on the only issue for which he was elected: immigration. Press him? He serves The Nose now, and is a beacon of false hope. Fk him. Thanks to the demographic terrorism he refused to stop he’s the last retardican RINO to ever fart in the Oval Office chair.

    Let the rains fall. We were never going to vote our way out of this.

    • Replies: @neutral

    He serves The Nose now
     
    He was always loyal to the jew. I am still perplexed by people like Andrew Anglin that for some time thought that Trump was pro white. He let his own daughter marry a jew and let Kushner run the White House.
    , @onebornfree
    Sick of Orcs says:"Let the rains fall. We were never going to vote our way out of this."

    I'm pleased to say that I'm one of the very few who knew this before Trump got elected:

    "The Donald Trump "Make America Great Again" Scam.....or, "Why Donald Trump Won't Work":
    http://onebornfree-mythbusters.blogspot.com/2017/05/why-donald-trump-wont-work.html

    "You,Trump,Sanders Etc., Vs "Dictator Syndrome" :
    http://onebornfree-mythbusters.blogspot.com/2015/08/do-you-suffer-from-dictator-syndrome.html

    Regards, onebornfree
  107. @Corvinus
    Telling for a friend...

    Build your own platforms, then you won't have these issues. Free speech was reserved to citizens fighting against government intrusion, not private entities. Internet companies can do what they want with their property, right? Isn't that a sacred pillar of capitalism?

    Isn’t that a sacred pillar of capitalism?

    I think that you are still thinking using the establishment narrative that “conservatives” are supposed to be capitalists and liberals are more concerned about the worker. This was always a fake narrative, but now hardly anybody pretends to even follow this fakeness. The left are all about being anti white, they care nothing about workers, they very openly support woke corporations that crush white people speaking out.

    The only ones that still support capitalism are fake conservatives, that despite all the evidence, still support corporations, the same corporations that are destroying conservatives.

    • Agree: DreadIlk
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "I think that you are still thinking using the establishment narrative that “conservatives” are supposed to be capitalists and liberals are more concerned about the worker."

    Actually, I am not using that paradigm here. A capitalism can be a person who holds a conservative or liberal ideology.

    "The only ones that still support capitalism are fake conservatives..."

    How do you define "fake conservatives"?

    "that despite all the evidence, still support corporations, the same corporations that are destroying conservatives."

    What evidence? How is this destruction taking place?
  108. @Monotonous Languor
    Meanwhile everyone mindlessly accepts the legal fiction that such a thing as hate speech actually exists.

    When you accept the enemy's premises, then you will fight the wrong battles, and ultimately lose the war.

    Exactly.

    If, for example, you use Marxist language and argue as and how and about which Marxists want, then Marxism wins.

    We have been browbeaten and bribed and miseducated into Cultural Marxist language.

  109. @War for Blair Mountain
    The Ergodic Hypothesis:What goes around...comes around...infinitely often...

    Well now, that’s a scary thought....isn’t it?.......Comet Pizza Global Homo....infinitely often....this would mean that the Universe is innately evil......Perhaps the Universe needs to be destroyed.......Has Frank Tipler ever considered this possibility?

    Just as scary……the ugly Sheboon face of Condeleeza Rice yapping about the negro MLK…followed by thermonuclear threats against Christian Russia….to the “music” of Beyoncé farting in the general direction of Christian Russia during the SUPERBOWL HALFTIME SHOW….followed HINDU-JAMAICA POTUS KAMALA HARRIS…launching the nukes in the general direction of Christian Russia…………..

    America has become a nasty smelly NEGRO FART JOKE…………….INFINITELY OFTEN….converging to the NEGRO FART JOKE AMERICA…..

  110. @Cagey Beast
    It's not just the Jews who are pushing for internet censorship. Pretty much everyone at the top of the social pyramid want to go back to the days of mass media gate-keeping.

    Cagey Beast says: “It’s not just the Jews who are pushing for internet censorship. Pretty much everyone at the top of the social pyramid want to go back to the days of mass media gate-keeping.”

    Including the dim-witted author of this article [although I assume he’s not even “at the top of the social pyramid”].

    Regards, onebornfree

  111. @Sick of Orcs

    Yep, it sucks he’s failed on some issues. been good on other issues. best course of action as always is to continue to press him to deliver.
     
    Trump failed on the only issue for which he was elected: immigration. Press him? He serves The Nose now, and is a beacon of false hope. Fk him. Thanks to the demographic terrorism he refused to stop he's the last retardican RINO to ever fart in the Oval Office chair.

    Let the rains fall. We were never going to vote our way out of this.

    He serves The Nose now

    He was always loyal to the jew. I am still perplexed by people like Andrew Anglin that for some time thought that Trump was pro white. He let his own daughter marry a jew and let Kushner run the White House.

    • Replies: @Sick of Orcs
    Some believe Trump was a con man all along. I don't. There's a noticeable difference in him starting in 2017.

    Either way, the result is the same, I'm only sorry the Orange Bullfrog will never have the awareness to realize how badly he failed history and us.
    , @Cassowary
    His affinity to Jews was something many people were willing to accept as a major but non-fatal flaw, and that he at the end of the day wasn't going to be truly pro-white. He could have reversed much of the rot and set things on the right course, even if he was highly favorable to Jews. And after all, he had Stephen Miller in his cabinet, who was seemingly quite atypical for Jews.

    He's turned out to be as big of a boomer shabbos goy zionist retard as you can get. Oh well.
  112. @anon
    We first need a nation (a natal, birth-related group) before we can nationalize anything. The US is not a nation anymore, but a mulikulti empire expressly set against nationalism.

    That was true of the Brit WASP Empire no later than the 18th century. The nationalism of what people like Chesterton called ‘Little England’ was despised too, just not as much as Irish or Scottish nationalism. The Brit WASP Empire also murdered almost all of what made ‘Little England’ worthwhile.

    • Replies: @Kent Nationalist
    There was no such faction in 18th century British politics; the Tories did not want involvement with Continental affairs but they supported, even more than the Whigs, colonial expansion.
  113. @onebornfree
    AK: (9) The one happy thing about all this is that more and more restrictions and censorship means higher quality output.

    Anonymous[381] • Disclaimer says: Uh, you’re either drunk or stupid. Possibly both.


    You got that right .

    Coupled with AK's :"Note that most of the greatest “subversive” literature was produced in moderately repressive ancien regimes," and "First, it weeds out the grifters – no point to grifting when you are blacklisted and deplatformed from everything."


    State censorship [Google/YouTube = CIA/NSA etc.] is good because it produces better subversive literature and weeds out those he subjectively views as "grifters" ?

    Definitely both drunk and stupid, as far as I can see :-)

    This just in: The US was not supposed to be even a "moderately repressive ancien regime". It was founded as being the exact opposite.

    [And yes, I'm fully aware that it is now no different from a "moderately repressive ancien regime", or even worse.]

    Regards onebornfree

    Nonargument, lol. Proper art is always created within boundaries, without boundaries all you get is piss christ and vagene monologues.

    Same with political copy.

    • Replies: @onebornfree
    WHAT says: "Nonargument, lol. Proper art is always created within boundaries, without boundaries all you get is piss christ and vagene monologues. Same with political copy."

    This just in:

    “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1st_amendment

    No regards, onebornfree

  114. @War for Blair Mountain
    The Ergodic Hypothesis:What goes around...comes around...infinitely often...

    Well now, that’s a scary thought....isn’t it?.......Comet Pizza Global Homo....infinitely often....this would mean that the Universe is innately evil......Perhaps the Universe needs to be destroyed.......Has Frank Tipler ever considered this possibility?

    Just as scary……the ugly Sheboon face of Condeleeza Rice yapping about the negro MLK…followed by thermonuclear threats against Christian Russia….to the “music” of Beyoncé farting in the general direction of Christian Russia during the SUPERBOWL HALFTIME SHOW….followed HINDU-JAMAICA POTUS KAMALA HARRIS…launching the nukes in the general direction of Christian Russia…………..

    America has become a nasty smelly NEGRO FART JOKE…………….INFINITELY OFTEN….converging to the NEGRO FART JOKE AMERICA…..

  115. @Sick of Orcs

    Yep, it sucks he’s failed on some issues. been good on other issues. best course of action as always is to continue to press him to deliver.
     
    Trump failed on the only issue for which he was elected: immigration. Press him? He serves The Nose now, and is a beacon of false hope. Fk him. Thanks to the demographic terrorism he refused to stop he's the last retardican RINO to ever fart in the Oval Office chair.

    Let the rains fall. We were never going to vote our way out of this.

    Sick of Orcs says:“Let the rains fall. We were never going to vote our way out of this.”

    I’m pleased to say that I’m one of the very few who knew this before Trump got elected:

    “The Donald Trump “Make America Great Again” Scam…..or, “Why Donald Trump Won’t Work”:
    http://onebornfree-mythbusters.blogspot.com/2017/05/why-donald-trump-wont-work.html

    “You,Trump,Sanders Etc., Vs “Dictator Syndrome” :
    http://onebornfree-mythbusters.blogspot.com/2015/08/do-you-suffer-from-dictator-syndrome.html

    Regards, onebornfree

    • Replies: @Sick of Orcs
    I agree with your assessment. Trump's value lied in buying us some time. We got 12-18 months and a few good things, none of which are lasting or will stop ongoing demographic terrorism.
  116. @WHAT
    Nonargument, lol. Proper art is always created within boundaries, without boundaries all you get is piss christ and vagene monologues.

    Same with political copy.

    WHAT says: “Nonargument, lol. Proper art is always created within boundaries, without boundaries all you get is piss christ and vagene monologues. Same with political copy.”

    This just in:

    “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1st_amendment

    No regards, onebornfree

    • Replies: @neutral
    Except when they pass laws making sure blacks are not discriminated against by any religion, same applies to homosexuals, or when they arrest journalists like Assange, or when they pass laws banning BDS, or when.... The list is endless.
  117. @Kent Nationalist
    What's the point of this? Presumably the target audience for 'try-on' and 'haul' (for clothes) videos is girls. But are girls attracted by images of scantily clad women and cleavage?

    She also has in addition to her various social media outlets a long list of patrons, the vast majority of whom seem to be men. The girls watch for the clothing ideas, the boys for the candy.

    Point being for the Alt-light that they need to develop multiple streams of income not entirely dependent on the benevolence of one corporate plantation master.

    • Replies: @Kent Nationalist
    Why would you (pay to) watch this woman natter on when you can find millions of images of genuinely beautiful women?
  118. @onebornfree
    WHAT says: "Nonargument, lol. Proper art is always created within boundaries, without boundaries all you get is piss christ and vagene monologues. Same with political copy."

    This just in:

    “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1st_amendment

    No regards, onebornfree

    Except when they pass laws making sure blacks are not discriminated against by any religion, same applies to homosexuals, or when they arrest journalists like Assange, or when they pass laws banning BDS, or when…. The list is endless.

    • Agree: onebornfree
  119. @Jake
    I think everything you write is the truth and that the smart Liberals know that and are doing all they can to bring this slaughter to fruition.

    Now, we are all about to be revealed as just like Palestinians. Now, they are revealed to be Cromwell, and we are the Irish Catholics that Cromwell intends to send to Hell or Connaught.

    And our mainstream 'conservative' leaders are just like Ulstermen, who always have been more than willing, who always itch, to do all the dirty work of the Elites, and then allow themselves to be shit on by those Elites, time after time after every time.

    This quote I found thought provoking: "Black and Hispanic NCO’s would tell their infantry “You may rape, but discreetly” and then you would see war crimes visited on white rural women unseen since Russians invaded Germany in World War II."

    It made me wonder about the fact that on average, Germans from East Germany have better common sense about such matters than do Germans from West Germany. We should know that American and Brit troops, usually with payment, had their way millions of times with German women and would have fathered thousands of children. We also should know that Jews rampaged across the parts of Germany controlled by the US, UK, and France, raping multitudes and bribing even more into prostitution. Those Jews also would have produced large numbers of bastards on West German women.

    Is there any possible meaning that could be discerned from these events and what we see today?

    Look at the Amazon Indians in the Brazilian rain forests. When Hispanic governments/businesses want to log or mine, they simply order the military to shoot the Amazonian Indians.

    When America becomes Brazil pt 2, same thing for rural white resistors.

    The reality is that Red States have no power. As far as Jews on Wall Street, Hispanics in their barrios and machete-worshiping drug cartels, blacks in the hood and felch-breath gays are concerned Red State whites are only good for handing over things like toilet paper from forestry or breakfast cereal.

    None of them give a fat rat’s ass how Red State rural whites feel.

    • Replies: @frankie p
    Jeff,

    You're talking out of the wrong orifice again. A few questions should provide you with some food for thought. How many Amazonian Indians are serving in the Brazilian military? What percentage of the troops? How many Red State whites are serving in the US military? What percentage of the troops? Would white troops from Red States shoot their families, friends and the people from their ?communities? Or would they turn their guns on their officers? How many guns are in the hands of the Amazonian Indians? How many guns are in the hands of white people in Red States? Are they proficient in the use of those guns? Are they able to organize among their communities when they are faced with a real threat?

    They should give a fat rat's ass about how Red State rural whites feel, because the fine thread that still binds America as a viable nation is those Red State rural whites, as Obama said "clinging to their guns and their religion". They are actually at this point the only hope for America. God bless them.

    Frankie P
  120. Here is Carlos Maza, the social media superstar whose complaints allegedly kicked off this latest YouTube purge. Listen to him unironically explain the media’s rightful role as gatekeeper:

  121. @Corvinus
    Telling for a friend...

    Build your own platforms, then you won't have these issues. Free speech was reserved to citizens fighting against government intrusion, not private entities. Internet companies can do what they want with their property, right? Isn't that a sacred pillar of capitalism?

    Corvinus says:“Internet companies can do what they want with their property, right? Isn’t that a sacred pillar of capitalism?”

    Why yes, except for the inconvenient fact that Google/Youtube is not a private company that can [therefor] censor any content it does not like.

    If you dig a little, you’ll discover that Google is a CIA funded creation. Always has been, always will be. Same goes for Amazon [ probably Facebook Twitter, and others too].

    Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances”

    Regards, onebornfree

    • Replies: @DJS
    "If you dig a little, you’ll discover that Google is a CIA funded creation. " It seems you have done your share of digging. Congratulations on your hard work. What stops you from bringing a law suit? Perhaps inability to distinguish "funding" from "ownership"?
    , @Corvinus
    "If you dig a little, you’ll discover that Google is a CIA funded creation."

    According to Who/Whom? What are your sources?
  122. @Jake
    That was true of the Brit WASP Empire no later than the 18th century. The nationalism of what people like Chesterton called 'Little England' was despised too, just not as much as Irish or Scottish nationalism. The Brit WASP Empire also murdered almost all of what made 'Little England' worthwhile.

    There was no such faction in 18th century British politics; the Tories did not want involvement with Continental affairs but they supported, even more than the Whigs, colonial expansion.

    • Replies: @Jake
    Your second assertion contradicts your first. If you are about colonial expansion, you are an imperialist, and imperialism must necessarily always pollute the imperial nation. You cannot have any meaningful Little England while you have the British Empire.

    The founding of Freemasonry was a stroke of genius, the kind of thing that marks WASP culture (WASP is necessarily Modern only - there, obviously, was no WASP culture in 1200 or 1400). Freemasonry provided a club to replace the former guilds and such that helped tie men to 'little' nations and even more so their local communities, but with a huge difference: because Freemasonry is universalist, it is a perfect vehicle for imperialism. Freemasonry quickly began to become the de facto 'church' for its members, who intended to take the Lodge global - and Lodge rode on the coattails of British trade and then the Empire's troops.

    Oliver Cromwell made the deal with Low Countries Jewish bankers precisely to forge a centralized 'UK" (run by Parliament, his idea of Parliament). The "Glorious'/'Bloodless' revolution was to make certain that the restored monarchy could never oppose that new WASP culture as it intended to spread itself across the globe.
  123. It makes things easier, really. Now, to find out the truth, just tune in to youtube and invert everything you hear.
    It is a blessing in disguise. Talking was becoming a crutch. The will move dissidence into the sphere of connections in the real world.
    They just destroyed their best sedative.
    I started dowloading gigs of videos last year. If anyone needs to find videos on why the aliens who did 9/11 planned the whole thing in Antarctica after subverting all the penguins and recruiting to jews to push the whole agenda through the third reich-just hit me up.

    • Replies: @peterAUS

    ...to find out the truth, just tune in to youtube and invert everything you hear.
     
    You are onto something here for sure.

    Talking was becoming a crutch. The will move dissidence into the sphere of connections in the real world.
     
    Precisely.

    Not even that, in fact. Smart people can and will be able to use technology to exchange ideas and thoughts. In the coming stage information and (action) plans.

    The idea, vision and will are important. All the rest, Internet included, is just a tool.

    Before, it was a written letter and 9mm handgun.
    Next time it will be encrypted and compressed small binary blob sent over IoT and remote controlled (very small) drone. Or similar.
  124. @jeff stryker
    VIRAL


    Except that the deplorable white proles (Previously known as "peasants") have the power to cut off the food supply because they grow the food. Of course in America most of these people themselves rely on Wal-Mart, fuel and Opoid rehab centers. Still, if the farmers and truckers simply ceased transporting goods (As Reed has mentioned) to Manhattan (THEY) would be cannibals in three days.

    The same is true in UK. Food is not grown in Mayor Khan's backyard. If UK farmers cut the food supply to London for a single fortnight, that is all she wrote.

    Tacitly, this is why black rioting in the US no longer matters. People don't care if there is rioting in Baltimore or Ferguson and blacks burn down their crack houses. After a few days of this, they will simply be hungry, having burned down the local curry take out and having no agriculture, so they simply stop rioting.

    On the other hand since (THEY) are backed by the Pentagon, it is possible that the military might resort to martial law and simply seize farmer's produce. This would probably happen because officers on the East Coast beltway would also feel the effect of having middle-american deplorables cut off the food supply.

    Even if the farmers could manage this, the government would simply import food from abroad until they crushed the rebellion.

  125. @The Alarmist
    She also has in addition to her various social media outlets a long list of patrons, the vast majority of whom seem to be men. The girls watch for the clothing ideas, the boys for the candy.

    Point being for the Alt-light that they need to develop multiple streams of income not entirely dependent on the benevolence of one corporate plantation master.

    Why would you (pay to) watch this woman natter on when you can find millions of images of genuinely beautiful women?

  126. A good summary of the power play behind the newest round of YT censorship:

    Regards, onebornfree

  127. May 24, 2019 Facebook Censorship BACKFIRED, Major Brands FLEE Platform

    Facebook Censorship BACKFIRED, Major Brands FLEE Platform. As Predicted Facebook Censorship Is DESTROYING The Company.

    April 3, 2019 Big Government and Big Tech versus the Internet and everyone

    Governments around the world began trying to bring the Internet under control as soon as they realized the danger to their power represented by unfettered public access to, and exchange of, information.

    http://www.intrepidreport.com/archives/26752

  128. E says:

    Bitchute and DTube are decentralized in terms of how they HOST the videos, but both have the power to remove videos from their main site. The only difference from Youtube is that they don’t need the expensive server farms.

    PeerTube is the only one that’s decentralized AND federated, making it harder to censor, especially if you get Ron Unz for example to run an instance of it (ideally you’d need the capability to easily move your channel with all its videos from one instance of Peertube to another – I’m not sure if this is yet implemented).
    https://framatube.org/videos/watch/217eefeb-883d-45be-b7fc-a788ad8507d3
    http://joinpeertube.org/en/
    Subtitles also seem to work well on it.

    Also,
    https://tubecc.herokuapp.com/
    https://amara.org/en/
    are good for adding subtitles to any random videos uploaded on other sites.

    There was also MediaGoblin, a part of the GNU project, but I’m not sure how active that is these days.

  129. DJS says:

    @AK: I think six of the above comments explained again and again that there is no network effect on YT. None of the fash videos are ever shown on the “related” sidebar, and YT does not host a individual-to-individual recommendation system of any sort.

    You need to make good videos, and stop worrying about technicalities. I remember trying to get my social network onto Telegram, and getting all sorts of lame excuses about Whatsapp’s superiority. In the event, I realized that people who refused to install a second messaging app on their phone were not talkative, at least to me, on Whatsapp. It wasn’t the platform, it was the content that didn’t attract.

    Conversely, I visit Liveleaks a fee times a month, despite the horrible player. They have good stuff. I like videos with Gypsies caught stealing and receiving extrajudicial corrections.

    Second, if Ramzpaul has 3 videos a week, each with 5K views, each consuming 50 MB, that’s 750 GB a week. Most of these numbers would be lower for these people, or for you. In fact, you can bet on a viewership an order of magnitude smaller. If you feel insulted by the 500 views I predicted for you, buy 50 dollars’s worth of ads every month, until they ban you. If anything, my professional website has unlimited traffic, and costs some 10 dollars a month.

    Just make your stuff, and, yes, spend money on it, if you are committed to it. Don’t worry about the money (see below) or the platform. You are not a professional specialist in social media, so how would worrying change anything? I can worry as much as I want about brain surgery, but chances are I’ll never get a brain operation right.

    Because, finally, there is something fundamentally wrong with the way everybody approaches monetization. Dick Morris or Sloppy Steve got pennies from the TV stations. They made their money from his political masters. There is no market for opinions, in the way you imagine. There is a market for bootlickers, and another market for advertisement-inflated entertainers. You would be neither. Most of the people who complain about demonetization are neither, and probably make money by waiting tables, when they don’t post smart-ass vlogs.

    Long story short, make good videos, if your heart is in it, and stop worrying about platforms or profit.

    OTOH, you may want to think hard if it makes any sense to speak to 500 people. To use the above example, Ramzpaul doesn’t seem fazed, since many videos uploaded by PBS, TYT, RT are at the same level. But do you?

    : There is no difference about a “freedom fighter” opposing Communism during the Soviet-era and an islamist demanding Sharia for New Hampshire. The majority of the sane people go with the flow, in particular when the “dissident” narrative is pushed by enemy governments (Radio Free Europe in the eighties; Press TV and Saudi-sponsored madrasas today). There is no reason to idolize a handful of operatives and useful idiots.

    : Red states are hardly able to upkeep their schools (check their SAT scores) and their hospitals (see their life expectancy).

    Also, you were supposedly woke enough (or is it anti-woke?) to believe, without questioning, that the state can’t do anything, schools, hospitals, or video streaming websites. I wish I could explain it it to you, it’s some sophistry said by Thatcher or Reagan. I don’t know how to explain it, but I know the short version. I think it boils down to “governments can’t do shit”, although it may be limited to governments ran by Thatcher, Reagan, Piyush, and Nimrata.

    : You seem to be disconnected from real life. There are several vlogs made by East Europeans who work as truckers in US. They think it’s cool to make 45K a year as a contractor, because it sounds a lot more than at home. The general feeling is that the the “white truckers” you describe don’t exist, and very few Americans still work in trucking.

    Perhaps you are so disconnected that I need to explain to you how US agriculture works. Three quarters of agricultural workers in US are foreign born. Almost a half of the total are illegals. SeeYou and your imaginary “white workers” can block your asses in an office chair.

    Also, what’s with the guns? We’re talking about YT censorship. Do you think that if everyone had big guns, YT would have trembled in fear? Why not add something about stem cell research, to go full retard?

    • Replies: @homahr
    Saudi-sponsored madrassas are allies of the West, not their enemies.
    , @Kratoklastes

    There is no market for opinions, in the way you imagine. There is a market for bootlickers, and another market for advertisement-inflated entertainers
     
    NAILED IT.

    One caveat: the ‘Remnant’ types (to pinch Gary North’s term) do value ideas and their analysis, although by and large they take a dim view of anyone who thinks their opinions are of such high quality that they merit a paywall.

    It’s the old Catch-22; anyone who thinks they’ve got opinions that people should pay for, guarantees that their audience consists of people within sigma of the median... [I had to write ‘sigma’ in full because I’m using fucking iShit... this fucking iPad Pro has no mechanism for inserting Greek letters - but gives me a choice of a thousand fucktarded emojis. That alone tells you about the psycho metrics of their target market].
  130. @El Dato
    Blue-haired ladies in the censorship room don't like dat bambie killed!

    Go to the supermarket to buy meat like everyone else.

    Go to the supermarket to buy meat like everyone else.

    Wild game tastes better and makes a boy into a man.

    • Replies: @anonymous coward

    Wild game tastes better
     
    Yes.

    ... and makes a boy into a man.
     
    Sorry, no. Only hard work and responsibility does that. Certainly not the recreational killing of wild animals.

    P.S. Seeing your comment gives me proof America is doomed.
    , @Anonymoose
    that's the spirit.
  131. @216
    The only solution that I think is lasting is nationalization.

    Google, Apple, Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter, Amazon.

    Uncucked red states should consider a "sovereign Internet".

    Uncucked red states and cucked blue states have one thing in common: they love getting raped by israel

  132. DJS says:
    @onebornfree
    AK: (9) The one happy thing about all this is that more and more restrictions and censorship means higher quality output.

    Anonymous[381] • Disclaimer says: Uh, you’re either drunk or stupid. Possibly both.


    You got that right .

    Coupled with AK's :"Note that most of the greatest “subversive” literature was produced in moderately repressive ancien regimes," and "First, it weeds out the grifters – no point to grifting when you are blacklisted and deplatformed from everything."


    State censorship [Google/YouTube = CIA/NSA etc.] is good because it produces better subversive literature and weeds out those he subjectively views as "grifters" ?

    Definitely both drunk and stupid, as far as I can see :-)

    This just in: The US was not supposed to be even a "moderately repressive ancien regime". It was founded as being the exact opposite.

    [And yes, I'm fully aware that it is now no different from a "moderately repressive ancien regime", or even worse.]

    Regards onebornfree

    Who cares about how the US was founded? It’s been a while since the Founding Fathers have gone.

    In any event, if you want me to believe you are attached to their values, you need to show me that you are wearing clothes just like theirs. If you can’t stick to simple things like length of a shirt, in era when everyone is free to wear whatever clothes they want, how can I trust you are attached to the Founding Fathers vision and values on more complex issues, like Occupation of Porto Rico, Annexation of Hawaii, District of Columbia v. Clawans, or abortion?

    • Replies: @onebornfree
    DJS says: "Who cares about how the US was founded? "

    Well obviously, neither yourself, or Anatoly Karlin, for that matter! :-)

    "Regards", onebornfree
  133. @neutral

    He serves The Nose now
     
    He was always loyal to the jew. I am still perplexed by people like Andrew Anglin that for some time thought that Trump was pro white. He let his own daughter marry a jew and let Kushner run the White House.

    Some believe Trump was a con man all along. I don’t. There’s a noticeable difference in him starting in 2017.

    Either way, the result is the same, I’m only sorry the Orange Bullfrog will never have the awareness to realize how badly he failed history and us.

  134. @DJS
    @AK: I think six of the above comments explained again and again that there is no network effect on YT. None of the fash videos are ever shown on the "related" sidebar, and YT does not host a individual-to-individual recommendation system of any sort.

    You need to make good videos, and stop worrying about technicalities. I remember trying to get my social network onto Telegram, and getting all sorts of lame excuses about Whatsapp's superiority. In the event, I realized that people who refused to install a second messaging app on their phone were not talkative, at least to me, on Whatsapp. It wasn't the platform, it was the content that didn't attract.

    Conversely, I visit Liveleaks a fee times a month, despite the horrible player. They have good stuff. I like videos with Gypsies caught stealing and receiving extrajudicial corrections.

    Second, if Ramzpaul has 3 videos a week, each with 5K views, each consuming 50 MB, that's 750 GB a week. Most of these numbers would be lower for these people, or for you. In fact, you can bet on a viewership an order of magnitude smaller. If you feel insulted by the 500 views I predicted for you, buy 50 dollars's worth of ads every month, until they ban you. If anything, my professional website has unlimited traffic, and costs some 10 dollars a month.

    Just make your stuff, and, yes, spend money on it, if you are committed to it. Don't worry about the money (see below) or the platform. You are not a professional specialist in social media, so how would worrying change anything? I can worry as much as I want about brain surgery, but chances are I'll never get a brain operation right.

    Because, finally, there is something fundamentally wrong with the way everybody approaches monetization. Dick Morris or Sloppy Steve got pennies from the TV stations. They made their money from his political masters. There is no market for opinions, in the way you imagine. There is a market for bootlickers, and another market for advertisement-inflated entertainers. You would be neither. Most of the people who complain about demonetization are neither, and probably make money by waiting tables, when they don't post smart-ass vlogs.

    Long story short, make good videos, if your heart is in it, and stop worrying about platforms or profit.

    OTOH, you may want to think hard if it makes any sense to speak to 500 people. To use the above example, Ramzpaul doesn't seem fazed, since many videos uploaded by PBS, TYT, RT are at the same level. But do you?

    @iffen: There is no difference about a "freedom fighter" opposing Communism during the Soviet-era and an islamist demanding Sharia for New Hampshire. The majority of the sane people go with the flow, in particular when the "dissident" narrative is pushed by enemy governments (Radio Free Europe in the eighties; Press TV and Saudi-sponsored madrasas today). There is no reason to idolize a handful of operatives and useful idiots.

    @anon: Red states are hardly able to upkeep their schools (check their SAT scores) and their hospitals (see their life expectancy).

    Also, you were supposedly woke enough (or is it anti-woke?) to believe, without questioning, that the state can't do anything, schools, hospitals, or video streaming websites. I wish I could explain it it to you, it's some sophistry said by Thatcher or Reagan. I don't know how to explain it, but I know the short version. I think it boils down to "governments can't do shit", although it may be limited to governments ran by Thatcher, Reagan, Piyush, and Nimrata.

    @jeff stryker: You seem to be disconnected from real life. There are several vlogs made by East Europeans who work as truckers in US. They think it's cool to make 45K a year as a contractor, because it sounds a lot more than at home. The general feeling is that the the "white truckers" you describe don't exist, and very few Americans still work in trucking.

    Perhaps you are so disconnected that I need to explain to you how US agriculture works. Three quarters of agricultural workers in US are foreign born. Almost a half of the total are illegals. See https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/charts/63465/legalstatus2014_450px.png?v=1467 You and your imaginary "white workers" can block your asses in an office chair.

    Also, what's with the guns? We're talking about YT censorship. Do you think that if everyone had big guns, YT would have trembled in fear? Why not add something about stem cell research, to go full retard?

    Saudi-sponsored madrassas are allies of the West, not their enemies.

  135. @onebornfree
    Corvinus says:"Internet companies can do what they want with their property, right? Isn’t that a sacred pillar of capitalism?"

    Why yes, except for the inconvenient fact that Google/Youtube is not a private company that can [therefor] censor any content it does not like.

    If you dig a little, you'll discover that Google is a CIA funded creation. Always has been, always will be. Same goes for Amazon [ probably Facebook Twitter, and others too].

    "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances"

    Regards, onebornfree

    “If you dig a little, you’ll discover that Google is a CIA funded creation. ” It seems you have done your share of digging. Congratulations on your hard work. What stops you from bringing a law suit? Perhaps inability to distinguish “funding” from “ownership”?

    • Replies: @Jake
    As the CIA, like the Mossad and the Saudi General Intelligence Presidency, was founded out of British Secret service, that which is CIA created and/or funded also serves the Israelis and Jews generally, as well as the Saudis and the British Deep State.
  136. @onebornfree
    Sick of Orcs says:"Let the rains fall. We were never going to vote our way out of this."

    I'm pleased to say that I'm one of the very few who knew this before Trump got elected:

    "The Donald Trump "Make America Great Again" Scam.....or, "Why Donald Trump Won't Work":
    http://onebornfree-mythbusters.blogspot.com/2017/05/why-donald-trump-wont-work.html

    "You,Trump,Sanders Etc., Vs "Dictator Syndrome" :
    http://onebornfree-mythbusters.blogspot.com/2015/08/do-you-suffer-from-dictator-syndrome.html

    Regards, onebornfree

    I agree with your assessment. Trump’s value lied in buying us some time. We got 12-18 months and a few good things, none of which are lasting or will stop ongoing demographic terrorism.

  137. Jake says:
    @Kent Nationalist
    There was no such faction in 18th century British politics; the Tories did not want involvement with Continental affairs but they supported, even more than the Whigs, colonial expansion.

    Your second assertion contradicts your first. If you are about colonial expansion, you are an imperialist, and imperialism must necessarily always pollute the imperial nation. You cannot have any meaningful Little England while you have the British Empire.

    The founding of Freemasonry was a stroke of genius, the kind of thing that marks WASP culture (WASP is necessarily Modern only – there, obviously, was no WASP culture in 1200 or 1400). Freemasonry provided a club to replace the former guilds and such that helped tie men to ‘little’ nations and even more so their local communities, but with a huge difference: because Freemasonry is universalist, it is a perfect vehicle for imperialism. Freemasonry quickly began to become the de facto ‘church’ for its members, who intended to take the Lodge global – and Lodge rode on the coattails of British trade and then the Empire’s troops.

    Oliver Cromwell made the deal with Low Countries Jewish bankers precisely to forge a centralized ‘UK” (run by Parliament, his idea of Parliament). The “Glorious’/’Bloodless’ revolution was to make certain that the restored monarchy could never oppose that new WASP culture as it intended to spread itself across the globe.

    • Replies: @Kent Nationalist

    If you are about colonial expansion, you are an imperialist, and imperialism must necessarily always pollute the imperial nation. You cannot have any meaningful Little England while you have the British Empire.
     
    Tories in the 18th century thought differently.

    Blah blah banker freemason blah blah Jews blah blah
     
    Banking would have existed with or without Jews. Anyway what is the problem with banking when it allowed Britain to defeat its historically much more powerful enemy, France, and to spread the English nation across huge parts of the globe? Are you a propagandist for bankers?
  138. Rich says:
    @jeff stryker
    IFFEN


    Do you think most African-Americans or Mexicans would support Red State whites who want to reduce Federal taxes, cancel out Section 8, remove EBT and cut government spending on programs that give blacks or other minorities Affirmative Action jobs?

    Do you really think Jews, blacks, Mexicans and Asians have the same homesteading mentality as heritage Americans who live in a Red State? Is this is even a question a four year old would not have the answer to?

    Why do you think Jews, blacks, Mexicans and Asians live on the coast? Diversified economy. Money. Glorified poker games on Wall Street or IT stuff. None of these people are involved in primary economies like Red States are.

    The idea these "masses" would support freedom fighters running around the Ozarks or Montana is absurd.

    A good number of blacks would join the military if it declared martial law on these "freedom fighters" merely so they could storm the houses of farmers in Red States and rape their daughters. You think some politician like Octavio who is Latino is going to hesitate in ordering her National Guard troops to declare martial law. State governors in New Mexico might withdraw their troops from the border but they will happily massacre a Red State white rural "resistance". Black and Hispanic NCO's would tell their infantry "You may rape, but discreetly" and then you would see war crimes visited on white rural women unseen since Russians invaded Germany in World War II.

    The entire Red State idiom runs against what urban Blue States believe in-Mexicans, Italian-Americans on the East Coast, Hindus, Jews, blacks, Muslims are all tribal/extended clan mentalities who cannot relate to Clint Eastwood and John Wayne attitudes about "freedom" and "individualism" and "self-reliance". If you have not noticed, Democrats want gun control.

    So there is no support for resistance fighters. Blacks and Mestizos and Jews and Asians who like big government are not going get behind that.

    I don’t think Jews end up with the blacks and/or the Mexicans. Jews in the US are a pale-skinned people and neither a skull cap nor a curly beard is going to change that. Here in NYC, all the “anti-Semitic ” attacks being carried out against Jews have been by blacks and Hispanics. The media, the NYPD, and the politicians try to hide these facts, but there are too many security camera and phone videos to keep it under wraps. The Jews will either stand with other White skinned people, or be wiped out in any real race war.

    • Replies: @jeff stryker
    RICH


    Look at Jews in France. Sarkozy knew that his own people would be wiped out by unchecked immigration and that is exactly what happened.

    I completely agree with you. Also, in urban centers where blacks who seethe with resentment at their poverty and comparative lack of wealth the richest whites around are mostly Jews.

    In the case of Hispanics, I suspect they see Jews more as a political demographic that could block Reconquista. Easy enough to dismiss poor whites who lost their job in the Arkansas poultry factory, but it is the Jews who are the judges, lawyers, politicians with the money and influence who will prove more formidable adversaries.
    , @neutral

    Here in NYC, all the “anti-Semitic ” attacks being carried out against Jews have been by blacks and Hispanics
     

    The Jews will either stand with other White skinned people, or be wiped out in any real race war
     
    Those jews getting attacked in New York is good for the jews, it serves the likes of the ADL very well. It lets them publish their stats and news stories about how the jews are under so much danger, thus letting them clamp down on whites even more.

    Once white numbers get to South African levels then they won't need to resort to such tactics, they will just control an African type strong man with expensive gifts, this man will make sure that no such incidents of jews being attacked by his own people will occur. Just look how easily that dim witted Saudi Prince can be controlled by them as a good example.

  139. @ThreeCranes

    "Don’t try and tell me they’re not trying to turn us into sheep."
     
    With the rise of women in the workforce and especially in secondary and university education, there has been a concomitant war on the manly virtues of valor and gallantry.

    Use to be, poets immortalized their civilization's heroes by singing tales of their gallantry and sacrifice. Men fighting to the end when death was all but certain were commemorated and thus granted immortality--as much anyway as can be achieved by mere mortal men.

    Today, with the tearing down of statues and the feminine war on martial virtue, all that is lost. Bravery is no longer considered worthy. Instead, women teachers--and internet censors--promote a sedated, docile keypuncher as the ideal male.

    This goes against the grain of the Universe and won't end well.

    The 19th was a mistake.

    • Replies: @ThreeCranes
    Not too many years ago, used guns were sold in The Fivecenter, Little Nickel ad papers, classified ads in the local newspapers, yard sales and on local noon radio programs. Then we had few if any mass murders. Today gun sales are tightly regulated and mass murders are a monthly occurrence. What has changed?

    Obviously, there is not only a simple positive correlation between the availability of guns and murder and mayhem. Some other, broader factor is at work. (It's just like climate change. While it may be true that warming periods in the past were correlated with elevated atmospheric CO2, it does not follow that elevated CO2 causes warming. There may be a larger cause that drives both. Or, as we used to say, the appearance of robins doesn't make it rain in April or flowers bloom.)

    Anyway, it seems as though as women exert more control over the mores of our society, the worse men react. It's as though these rouge boys and men are lashing out against the feminization imposed upon them and society. It's like a boy who grows up in a house in which there is no Father presence. Biologically, psychologically, he misses the strength, weight and restraint that a man brings to bear upon things. Where a woman flutters her wings in helplessness, a man grabs a corner and heaves. It's no accident that criminality is worst among black boys who are the product of single mother families.

    We men are being denied our space and our virtues, which are boldness and active response. Every place we gather is now invaded by girls and women who aren't content until they have turned our treehouse into a doll house. In some psychological way, this is the cause of the school shootings.

  140. “(7) Prediction: The last dissident resources in the West to remain standing will be technically adept websites financed by moneyed individuals or groups (such as The Unz Review), or true cyberpunk “samizdat” outfits lurking in the deep web and kept afloat with crypto donations (such as The Daily Stormer).”
    https://dailystormer.name/limited-time-offer-get-a-free-daily-stormer-commenting-account/

    I think it would be a really good idea to become familiar with Tor (and setting up and using a VPN).

  141. @Anatoly Karlin
    Please keep off topic posts to the current Open Thread.

    If you are new to my work, start here.

    ***

    As reiner Tor points out, this was also probably a sign from God not to engage in vlogging. Since it now seems there is no way to be famous, edgy, and uncensored on YouTube, I am probably going to deprioritize these plans going forwards. I suppose it is good that it happened now, before I invested any significant time or energy into this enterprise (apart from ordering a mini-tripod for my smartphone). As for using Russian alternatives, apart from the aforementioned problem of all the significant Russians being on YouTube as well, I am certainly not going to be talking about Dagestani IQs on Russian platforms (i.e. for the same reason that German nationalists use VK over Facebook).

    Anti-neocon , Ryan Dawson has been massive deplatformed over the years.

  142. Jun 7, 2019 David Icke on Perception, Censorship, Vaccines, The Medical System and Anarchy

  143. @Rich
    I don't think Jews end up with the blacks and/or the Mexicans. Jews in the US are a pale-skinned people and neither a skull cap nor a curly beard is going to change that. Here in NYC, all the "anti-Semitic " attacks being carried out against Jews have been by blacks and Hispanics. The media, the NYPD, and the politicians try to hide these facts, but there are too many security camera and phone videos to keep it under wraps. The Jews will either stand with other White skinned people, or be wiped out in any real race war.

    RICH

    Look at Jews in France. Sarkozy knew that his own people would be wiped out by unchecked immigration and that is exactly what happened.

    I completely agree with you. Also, in urban centers where blacks who seethe with resentment at their poverty and comparative lack of wealth the richest whites around are mostly Jews.

    In the case of Hispanics, I suspect they see Jews more as a political demographic that could block Reconquista. Easy enough to dismiss poor whites who lost their job in the Arkansas poultry factory, but it is the Jews who are the judges, lawyers, politicians with the money and influence who will prove more formidable adversaries.

    • Replies: @Matra
    Look at Jews in France. Sarkozy knew that his own people would be wiped out by unchecked immigration and that is exactly what happened

    When did that happen? There have been lots of reports in conservative media claiming Jews are fleeing France for Israel due to Muslim anti-Semitism but I'm yet to see any real evidence of this. France still has the largest Jewish population in Europe.
  144. @ImmortalRationalist
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jEUXxLlVKLw

    The 19th was a mistake.

    Not too many years ago, used guns were sold in The Fivecenter, Little Nickel ad papers, classified ads in the local newspapers, yard sales and on local noon radio programs. Then we had few if any mass murders. Today gun sales are tightly regulated and mass murders are a monthly occurrence. What has changed?

    Obviously, there is not only a simple positive correlation between the availability of guns and murder and mayhem. Some other, broader factor is at work. (It’s just like climate change. While it may be true that warming periods in the past were correlated with elevated atmospheric CO2, it does not follow that elevated CO2 causes warming. There may be a larger cause that drives both. Or, as we used to say, the appearance of robins doesn’t make it rain in April or flowers bloom.)

    Anyway, it seems as though as women exert more control over the mores of our society, the worse men react. It’s as though these rouge boys and men are lashing out against the feminization imposed upon them and society. It’s like a boy who grows up in a house in which there is no Father presence. Biologically, psychologically, he misses the strength, weight and restraint that a man brings to bear upon things. Where a woman flutters her wings in helplessness, a man grabs a corner and heaves. It’s no accident that criminality is worst among black boys who are the product of single mother families.

    We men are being denied our space and our virtues, which are boldness and active response. Every place we gather is now invaded by girls and women who aren’t content until they have turned our treehouse into a doll house. In some psychological way, this is the cause of the school shootings.

    • Replies: @Miro23
    100% agree with this. Millennia of human evolution aren't wrong.
    , @Occams
    Anatoly;

    So. 9/11 - a WELL-PROVEN False Flag, and Sandy Hoax - another - are still 'conspiracy theories'?

    And THIS!?

    "The Saudis are clearly going out of the way building a case for war with Iran..."

    IT'S THE JEWS, STUPID.

    Don't know who's paying you to shill, but I'll trust outspoken Jew Stephen Lendmen;

    "The US and Israel are the 2 greatest threats to world peace today - and perhaps to humanity itself"

    When war DOES come, Anatoly, YOU will have blood on your hands for LYING. Hell, you already do, supporting that PREPOSTEROUS lie of 9/11.

    , @Clyde
    100% correct!
  145. @DJS
    Who cares about how the US was founded? It's been a while since the Founding Fathers have gone.

    In any event, if you want me to believe you are attached to their values, you need to show me that you are wearing clothes just like theirs. If you can't stick to simple things like length of a shirt, in era when everyone is free to wear whatever clothes they want, how can I trust you are attached to the Founding Fathers vision and values on more complex issues, like Occupation of Porto Rico, Annexation of Hawaii, District of Columbia v. Clawans, or abortion?

    DJS says: “Who cares about how the US was founded? “

    Well obviously, neither yourself, or Anatoly Karlin, for that matter! 🙂

    “Regards”, onebornfree

  146. @Rich
    I don't think Jews end up with the blacks and/or the Mexicans. Jews in the US are a pale-skinned people and neither a skull cap nor a curly beard is going to change that. Here in NYC, all the "anti-Semitic " attacks being carried out against Jews have been by blacks and Hispanics. The media, the NYPD, and the politicians try to hide these facts, but there are too many security camera and phone videos to keep it under wraps. The Jews will either stand with other White skinned people, or be wiped out in any real race war.

    Here in NYC, all the “anti-Semitic ” attacks being carried out against Jews have been by blacks and Hispanics

    The Jews will either stand with other White skinned people, or be wiped out in any real race war

    Those jews getting attacked in New York is good for the jews, it serves the likes of the ADL very well. It lets them publish their stats and news stories about how the jews are under so much danger, thus letting them clamp down on whites even more.

    Once white numbers get to South African levels then they won’t need to resort to such tactics, they will just control an African type strong man with expensive gifts, this man will make sure that no such incidents of jews being attacked by his own people will occur. Just look how easily that dim witted Saudi Prince can be controlled by them as a good example.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    Aren't you going a bit off track when you bring in the "dim witted Saudi prince"? The control by "expensive gifts" doesn't make sense in his case.
  147. None of this shit matters until regular conversations on all dissident sites are about homesteads. The hold on power by the current regime is tenuous. While people are fat and lazy they will not fight. However once resources dry up and they get told to sit down and shut up they will do the repeat of what always happened in history. Russia. China. Etc.

    What you need to concern your self with is not finding your self in the meat grinder.

    • Replies: @peterAUS

    While people are fat and lazy they will not fight. However once resources dry up and they get told to sit down and shut up they will do the repeat of what always happened in history.
     
    They will certainly try.
    Will they succeed is another matter altogether.
  148. @Johnny Rottenborough
    jimmyriddle—YouTube does bother Brother Nathanael. From his recent video, Soldier Boy:

    YouTube has censored probably most of my videos. Last week over a 20 minute period, I got 154 notices that YouTube believes in the ‘principles of free speech’. Doesn’t say the First Amendment, but ‘principles of free speech’. And then the big ‘Howwweeeever’. Do you realize they censored my religious video, Messiah Came to Conquer Death, because it’s offensive? Well, who is it offensive to, huh? A little tiny minority that thinks they rule it all.
     

    Ah well, I guess he popped-up on their radar somehow.

    But he had a pretty good run, considering the type of content he produces. Channels with far more innocuous fare were zapped before him.

  149. @Jake
    Your second assertion contradicts your first. If you are about colonial expansion, you are an imperialist, and imperialism must necessarily always pollute the imperial nation. You cannot have any meaningful Little England while you have the British Empire.

    The founding of Freemasonry was a stroke of genius, the kind of thing that marks WASP culture (WASP is necessarily Modern only - there, obviously, was no WASP culture in 1200 or 1400). Freemasonry provided a club to replace the former guilds and such that helped tie men to 'little' nations and even more so their local communities, but with a huge difference: because Freemasonry is universalist, it is a perfect vehicle for imperialism. Freemasonry quickly began to become the de facto 'church' for its members, who intended to take the Lodge global - and Lodge rode on the coattails of British trade and then the Empire's troops.

    Oliver Cromwell made the deal with Low Countries Jewish bankers precisely to forge a centralized 'UK" (run by Parliament, his idea of Parliament). The "Glorious'/'Bloodless' revolution was to make certain that the restored monarchy could never oppose that new WASP culture as it intended to spread itself across the globe.

    If you are about colonial expansion, you are an imperialist, and imperialism must necessarily always pollute the imperial nation. You cannot have any meaningful Little England while you have the British Empire.

    Tories in the 18th century thought differently.

    Blah blah banker freemason blah blah Jews blah blah

    Banking would have existed with or without Jews. Anyway what is the problem with banking when it allowed Britain to defeat its historically much more powerful enemy, France, and to spread the English nation across huge parts of the globe? Are you a propagandist for bankers?

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Kent: “I’m a nationalist”
    Also Kent: “The global ‘British’ Empire was good and Jewish-dominated usurious financial manipulation is good for enabling its”
    You goddamn lying cuck.
    , @Jake
    Tories in the 18th century were incorrect. Just like the incorrect American 'conservatives' who arrogantly assumed that they could take over from London in dictating to the world without impairing, much less utterly polluting and then destroying, middle American values and ways of life.

    Jewish bankers did not finance the British Empire just to make a profit. They knew that the British Empire would serve their interests, the larger and more long term cultural interests.

    Cromwell and then the Deep State behind the Restoration (of a politically castrated monarchy) and then the 'Glorious' Revolution and the founding of Freemasonry knew that they were building an empire to be the anti-Christendom Empire.

    The British Empire murdered Little England as surely as it murdered Ireland and Scotland as necessary steps to create an empire that would please Jewish bankers and the moral and spiritual heirs of Cromwell.
  150. @War for Blair Mountain
    Yes, it could be a prelude to war with Christian Russia and Shia Muslim Iran.

    Once homo marriage was legalized....it was onto homo pederasts in the Boy Scouts....gender-free maternity clinics....Satanic Looking Tranny Freaks reading books to 4 year olds in Public Libraries....

    Comet Pizza Global Homo is on rampage!!!...There is no going back for them....or should I say “IT”(Democrat Steven King is known pedophile...)

    How will the BIG WAR with Christian Russian and Shia Muslim Iran start?....Probably by accident....it will just happen.....One side will just bump into the other....at this point in time, that’s all it will take.......


    How do you say in Russia:”America is in a deep state of moral and spiritual rot.........rot....rot...rot......and more rot....”..............Blame JFK and the Beattles.....The Stones....The Who......Monty Python...........Beyoncé but.....tocks......

    Anatoly

    How PROPHETIC was I this morning!!!….I just saw the video:Russian Navy ship…US homo Navy ship almost slammed into each other……

    What is really scary about this is that when two Navy Ships slide by each other very close…..physics kicks in…in a nasty way…..a macroscopic “Van Wal Der Force” kicks in that pulls the two large ships together……a macroscopic version of the Casmir Force in quantum mechanics……..

    We almost had fucking nuclear WW3 TODAY…everyone go look at the video today…..Nuclear War because Donald Trump and PEDERAST Pete TOWNSHEND want to impose global homo on Christian Russia and Shia Muslim Iran…..

    Nuclear War 3 is just a fender bender away….

    • Replies: @War for Blair Mountain
    Ok...maybe there is no attractive force...but who knows.....too close for comfort for me.....
    , @ThreeCranes
    Alright, boys and girls. Go to your kitchen tap and turn on the water. Now, hold a spoon by the tip of the handle lightly between thumb and forefinger of one hand. With it's back i.e. the convex side, to the down-rushing stream of water, bring the extreme outside face of the cup of the spoon close to the stream until it just barely touches the edge of the flowing column. What happens?

    That's what draws the two ships together. Remember Bernoulli?
  151. It isn’t just YouTube and its brethren. My mildly politically incorrect site, Fred on everything, has been banned a few times by corporate mommy filters.

    • Agree: Anatoly Karlin
    • Replies: @Jake
    Your defense of Mexicans and general avoidance of Jews, as well as your agnosticism, are PC-acceptable, in some quarters PC-demanded. But you have told far too many horrific truths about the Numinous Negroes to be tolerated across the board.
    , @Wizard of Oz
    You mean the sort of filters ordinary businesses might instal to stop their employees using company computers to view porn?!!

    So, do you suspect something done automatically by Artificial Unintelligence or deliberate human decision at some and what level? (Different answer allowed for different censors I grant. And let's not forget ass-covering, playing safe etc after AI pops up with the warning words "Trump, Mexicans, Wall").

    I recall mentioning in an FT comment that UR was owned and run by a Jew when I gave a UR link to suggest unemphatically that Simon Schama's ADL-compatible view of the Leo Frank case was susceptible to contradiction. I found my Comment deleted but a couple of critical replies to it left standing. I tried to get an answer out of the female weekend moderator with an exotic, but not Jewish, name but concluded she was overwhelmed because all comments were closed for the rest of the weekend. So.... I never got an answer to my question whether the FT had a filter which required comments to be automatically accepted as prima facie unacceptable if someone noticed the word "Jew" and objected. Does that tally with your experience of corporate filters Fred?
  152. @jeff stryker
    RICH


    Look at Jews in France. Sarkozy knew that his own people would be wiped out by unchecked immigration and that is exactly what happened.

    I completely agree with you. Also, in urban centers where blacks who seethe with resentment at their poverty and comparative lack of wealth the richest whites around are mostly Jews.

    In the case of Hispanics, I suspect they see Jews more as a political demographic that could block Reconquista. Easy enough to dismiss poor whites who lost their job in the Arkansas poultry factory, but it is the Jews who are the judges, lawyers, politicians with the money and influence who will prove more formidable adversaries.

    Look at Jews in France. Sarkozy knew that his own people would be wiped out by unchecked immigration and that is exactly what happened

    When did that happen? There have been lots of reports in conservative media claiming Jews are fleeing France for Israel due to Muslim anti-Semitism but I’m yet to see any real evidence of this. France still has the largest Jewish population in Europe.

  153. @anon

    It will become a repository for cat and unpacking videos.
     
    As you said. No matter how big it seems to us, politics is minuscule part of youtube content.
    Of top YT videos, none is political.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_most-viewed_YouTube_videos

    The normies are on Youtube to listen to music and watch cat and dog videos. This is core YT audience. If YT shut down all politics left, right and center, normies would not notice at all.

    The inability to debunk false flags – or rather, to have it catch fire – may well result in avoidable wars.
     
    Did it ever worked? When was the last time when war was prevented by brave citizen journalists debunking war propaganda?
    Remember Iraq war - there was open debate on the internet, the WMD scare was thoroughly discredited, millions of people worldwide protested, and it did not mattered at all.

    Cat videos will have to be banned as well. Cat “owners” are haters violating the rights of cats that should be free, at least according to radical animal rights activists!

  154. @War for Blair Mountain
    Anatoly

    How PROPHETIC was I this morning!!!....I just saw the video:Russian Navy ship...US homo Navy ship almost slammed into each other......

    What is really scary about this is that when two Navy Ships slide by each other very close.....physics kicks in...in a nasty way.....a macroscopic “Van Wal Der Force” kicks in that pulls the two large ships together......a macroscopic version of the Casmir Force in quantum mechanics........

    We almost had fucking nuclear WW3 TODAY...everyone go look at the video today.....Nuclear War because Donald Trump and PEDERAST Pete TOWNSHEND want to impose global homo on Christian Russia and Shia Muslim Iran.....


    Nuclear War 3 is just a fender bender away....

    Ok…maybe there is no attractive force…but who knows…..too close for comfort for me…..

  155. @Anatoly Karlin
    I agree, and indeed, I endorsed you on that account for a brief period.

    Assuming you are who you say you are, it would have been even nicer if you hadn't gone crazy and doxed your own people.

    It’s me and thanks for being honest about your concerns.

    I’d ask you to read this synopsis written back at the time everything happened and makes it clear why I did what I did: https://christophercantwell.com/2018/04/08/doxing-and-anonymity/

    Embedded in that article is the contract RV floated to me at precisely this link https://christophercantwell.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Smartcheckr-Paul-Nehlen-Oct-19.pdf

    When you add everything up, it was clear the RV was a bad actor and his dox ultimately protected other candidates who might have fallen victim to this SmartCheckr scam.

    My policy positions haven’t changed since I ran in 2016: protect American workers and secure the border. I’ve been attacked on both fronts by (((neo-cons))) and (((liberals))) alike, not to mention the undermining done by “my own people” as you labeled them in your response.

    Ultimately, my battle to ensure that social media is treated as the new public square, where lawful speech ought to be protected hasn’t wavered. I’ve spent a small fortune filing an FEC complaint over my treatment by Twitter, where nothing I wrote was unlawful or untruthful.

    Thinking that taking away the dissident right’s voice on social media will lead somewhere other than violence (in Minecraft) is folly. You don’t tell people they have to pay taxes to support ZOG and then also tell them they have no avenue to voice their displeasure with the use of those taxes.

    • Agree: Anatoly Karlin
    • Replies: @Miro23

    Ultimately, my battle to ensure that social media is treated as the new public square, where lawful speech ought to be protected hasn’t wavered. I’ve spent a small fortune filing an FEC complaint over my treatment by Twitter, where nothing I wrote was unlawful or untruthful.

     

    1) you shouldn't have to spend a small fortune filing a FEC complaint 2) you're dealing with a public square which is in corrupted by private ownership. The problem is solved by putting the public square in public ownership.

    Thinking that taking away the dissident right’s voice on social media will lead somewhere other than violence (in Minecraft) is folly. You don’t tell people they have to pay taxes to support ZOG and then also tell them they have no avenue to voice their displeasure with the use of those taxes.
     
    The basic problem is the Jewish attempt to privatize America - the media - politics (lobbies) - special interests etc. Their principle is that if they hold the key positions, and pay the most, then they're in charge
    They need to find out that democracy isn't a commercial transaction and that they're restricted to their 2% representation in the population and that's it.
  156. @War for Blair Mountain
    Anatoly

    How PROPHETIC was I this morning!!!....I just saw the video:Russian Navy ship...US homo Navy ship almost slammed into each other......

    What is really scary about this is that when two Navy Ships slide by each other very close.....physics kicks in...in a nasty way.....a macroscopic “Van Wal Der Force” kicks in that pulls the two large ships together......a macroscopic version of the Casmir Force in quantum mechanics........

    We almost had fucking nuclear WW3 TODAY...everyone go look at the video today.....Nuclear War because Donald Trump and PEDERAST Pete TOWNSHEND want to impose global homo on Christian Russia and Shia Muslim Iran.....


    Nuclear War 3 is just a fender bender away....

    Alright, boys and girls. Go to your kitchen tap and turn on the water. Now, hold a spoon by the tip of the handle lightly between thumb and forefinger of one hand. With it’s back i.e. the convex side, to the down-rushing stream of water, bring the extreme outside face of the cup of the spoon close to the stream until it just barely touches the edge of the flowing column. What happens?

    That’s what draws the two ships together. Remember Bernoulli?

    • Replies: @ThreeCranes
    Note: spoon should be dangling down, not held horizontally.
    , @ThreeCranes
    Of course, the CNN announcer woman in her monologue while the clip is being shown says (not exact) "Look how that Russian ship is veering towards our ship!". Now this is sheer nationalist jingoism. In the real world, the stream of water acts fairly equally upon both. It cares not a whit that one is painted red and the other blue.
    , @War for Blair Mountain
    Yes...that’s very highly likely the physics involved....Bernoulli Principle.......but not really my main point......But your point raises the question why physicists use the maritime analogy of the Casimir Effect as if something like it...a macroscopic version of it as if there were a macroscopic version of it....The Casimir Effect...I think....Force range r^-4.....

    Main point:in light of the most recent US Navy at-sea-accident that killed over a dozen crew members.......God help us if the next close encounter by a Russian Frigate and USS Navy Frigate...especially if the US Navy Frigate has as its captain a Democratic Party Voter of this type:Annapolis Grad...Black Sheboon fond of giving Black Power Salutes with other Annapolis Sheboon Cadets:”Hail Obama”.....like the Sheboon Cadets at West Point are fond of doing in photographs that can be found on Google Images......So this is how it all ends......

    THE US CIVIL WAR WASN’T WORTH IT......800 thousand dead NATIVE BORN WHITE AMERICAN MEN...for what? Sheboon Power?
  157. @jeff stryker
    Bush was a Republican and he trashed the US. No matter how you cut it, Bill Clinton's economy and quality of life was better in the nineties than when Bush was elected in the year 2000.

    So it is not just Democrats that trash the country.

    The Republicans believe in putting the car in neutral while we head down-hill towards the cliff–the Democrats want to jam their foot on the accelerator.

    • Replies: @Johnny Walker Read
    What's funny is the "Mexican overdrive" will often times get you there quicker than WOT(wide open throttle), especially if the hill is steep, which it most certainly is.
  158. > Yes, alternatives exist, but by and large, people are not going to bother going to Bitchute or RuTube. … Second, YouTube operates on an annual loss of a billion dollars.

    Seems to me that evil RussiaChinaIranDPRK would have the motivation to surreptitiously fund something like Bitchute to allow anti-regime videos to flourish. After all, they won’t be reigning in anti-Putin or anti-Xi videos on CIA-tube anytime soon. #Cyber-infowar

  159. As Anatoly says, this is a good thing.

    Every society censors and imposes severe social costs on dissent.

    Oppression and persecution make you strong.

    You cannot achieve power before undergoing a period of severe testing and trial, where your psychological toughness is honed to a fine edge, where you develop stamina, resourcefulness, and flexibility.

    Despairing wilting flowers like Reiner Tor and German Reader will counsel surrender and submission, or beg the Chinese to save them and sodomize them, and the white HBD movement will “prove” that victory is genetically impossible because of 2,000 years ago cousin marriage was outlawed or something, but the strong will get stronger and better and more determined.

    • LOL: AaronB, Dreadilk
    • Troll: reiner Tor
  160. Anonymous[356] • Disclaimer says:
    @Kent Nationalist

    If you are about colonial expansion, you are an imperialist, and imperialism must necessarily always pollute the imperial nation. You cannot have any meaningful Little England while you have the British Empire.
     
    Tories in the 18th century thought differently.

    Blah blah banker freemason blah blah Jews blah blah
     
    Banking would have existed with or without Jews. Anyway what is the problem with banking when it allowed Britain to defeat its historically much more powerful enemy, France, and to spread the English nation across huge parts of the globe? Are you a propagandist for bankers?

    Kent: “I’m a nationalist”
    Also Kent: “The global ‘British’ Empire was good and Jewish-dominated usurious financial manipulation is good for enabling its”
    You goddamn lying cuck.

    • Replies: @Kent Nationalist
    I'm a nationalist. I am also for things which make my country stronger. There's not any contradiction between these two things.
  161. @ThreeCranes
    Alright, boys and girls. Go to your kitchen tap and turn on the water. Now, hold a spoon by the tip of the handle lightly between thumb and forefinger of one hand. With it's back i.e. the convex side, to the down-rushing stream of water, bring the extreme outside face of the cup of the spoon close to the stream until it just barely touches the edge of the flowing column. What happens?

    That's what draws the two ships together. Remember Bernoulli?

    Note: spoon should be dangling down, not held horizontally.

  162. @Anatoly Karlin
    Please keep off topic posts to the current Open Thread.

    If you are new to my work, start here.

    ***

    As reiner Tor points out, this was also probably a sign from God not to engage in vlogging. Since it now seems there is no way to be famous, edgy, and uncensored on YouTube, I am probably going to deprioritize these plans going forwards. I suppose it is good that it happened now, before I invested any significant time or energy into this enterprise (apart from ordering a mini-tripod for my smartphone). As for using Russian alternatives, apart from the aforementioned problem of all the significant Russians being on YouTube as well, I am certainly not going to be talking about Dagestani IQs on Russian platforms (i.e. for the same reason that German nationalists use VK over Facebook).

    Anatoly,

    Talking head videos on u-Tube are, to me, as worthless as cat videos.

    The best way to present such ideas is in writing.

    A debate among several parties, where the opponents aren’t aware of exactly what the other side will say, sure, video and print are both valid, and have different effects.

    I was surprised by the rise of (mainly doctrinaire western leftist) solo talking-head videos on u-Tube.

    It has always seemed to me a symptom of cultural breakdown.

    Too many people are now semi-literate, so they can’t really read.

    A solo talking-head video only has value if it has very strong performance or background montage elements (whether to the point or nonsensical).

    Otherwise, why not just offer it for reading. Of course, all too many people can’t really read, thus the rise of this genre.

    Moronic western leftists were doing it (the plain talking head, usually while wearing a mask) over a decade ago, some had fairly large numbers of viewers.

    The only thing that says is that their viewers are morons.

    Anglin is pretty smart, and I would guess from this article, that you, Anatoly, also read the Stormer at times. It sure gives me a laugh after work at times.

    I said ‘no’ to a tape-loop and electronic music project of mine being made available for download (four or so years ago). ‘I hold the copyrights’.

    I checked, I would suppose it was the same person, since there were six different covers, and the u-Tube videos all have the same cover that was earlier on offer.

    I have better and more essential things to do than send Google a take-down notice.

    They would likely not respond in any case.

    Google has been allowed to massively viovate copyrights as an instrument of Judaeo-Yankee state policy.

    While Napster was shut down, and new Napster was shut down, Youtube was allowed to massively violate copyriights.

    It is an evil joke, an act of the state, pure and simple .

  163. Dissident videos are one of the most powerful anti-establishment forms of communication since Gutenberg’s printing press. In the long run, CIA-tube’s efforts to Shut It Down will be just as successful as the suppression of the printing press.

  164. @DJS
    "If you dig a little, you’ll discover that Google is a CIA funded creation. " It seems you have done your share of digging. Congratulations on your hard work. What stops you from bringing a law suit? Perhaps inability to distinguish "funding" from "ownership"?

    As the CIA, like the Mossad and the Saudi General Intelligence Presidency, was founded out of British Secret service, that which is CIA created and/or funded also serves the Israelis and Jews generally, as well as the Saudis and the British Deep State.

  165. @Fred V. Reed
    It isn't just YouTube and its brethren. My mildly politically incorrect site, Fred on everything, has been banned a few times by corporate mommy filters.

    Your defense of Mexicans and general avoidance of Jews, as well as your agnosticism, are PC-acceptable, in some quarters PC-demanded. But you have told far too many horrific truths about the Numinous Negroes to be tolerated across the board.

    • Replies: @Farrakhan.DDuke.AliceWalker.AllAgree
    Potently accurate on all fours, a volume in two sentences.

    Fred has, indeed, written some of the most fearlessly accurate pieces on black misconduct and the hideous PC which has not just silenced most people but has then expressing views about black behavior founded in television fiction rather than daily life real time experiences.

    PC has inflicted devastation on the black community, a losing team being encouraged to continue its bad habits instead of being coached with tough love to improvement.

    There was once a motto black fathers followed in raising their sons: "Discipline is love, but love is not discipline." PC has voided all that.
  166. Literally, ‘censorship kills’ – Poster that has been hung up recalling Ms Nasim Aghdam, who went into the YouTube offices in San Bruno, California, on 3 April 2018, and opened fire with her 9mm Smith & Wesson pistol, wounding four before allegedly killing herself

    Nasim Aghdam was age 39, born in 1979 to an Iranian family, and identified as a member of the syncretic Shia-offshoot Baha’i religion … Getting de-monetised & censored on YouTube pushed her over the edge

    YouTube … You Next, says the poster, images of it popular as memes on 4chan etc

    • Replies: @Republic

    Getting de-monetised & censored on YouTube pushed her over the edge
     
    You Tube must have hired a lot of guards this week at its headquarters
    , @anon

    Literally, ‘censorship kills’ – Poster that has been hung up
     
    Hello Mr. Smith. Thanks for your service in defense of freedom, democracy and apple pie. We all appreciate it, really appreciate.

    https://www.dailydot.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/fbi-agent-in-my-computer.jpg


    Ms Nasim Aghdam
     
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YouTube_headquarters_shooting

    This incident was quickly forgotten, because leftist, vegan, animal rights defender woman of color doing gun violence does not serve the narrative (for now).
    If "Brabantian" gets his wish, and some alt-right MAGA hat wearing fascist shoots up some low paid YT employees, the TPTB dream will come true, and mother of all crackdown on all racists and 1fascists will come.

    Read about "propaganda of the deed". Anarchists 100 years ago were killing presidents and kings, and achieved shit. What can result from some retards shooting low paid workers and random bystanders?

    Individual terrorism is stupid.
    Do not be stupid.

    https://www.marxists.org/archive/trotsky/1911/11/tia09.htm
  167. @Mr McKenna

    YT don’t bother a channel like Brother Nathaniel (whose entire output consists of “What can I blame the Jews for, today?”). Instead, they go after centre-right anti-globalists like Sargon and Crowder.
     
    They'll very seldom deplatform clowns. Clowns serve a valuable purpose in de-legitimating the opposition. Look how ridiculous our critics are!

    Meanwhile, I don't watch videos so what happens (or doesn't) on YouTube doesn't matter much to me.

    And a very wise man once said: whatever the censors would cut out, should be cut out. Because if it's obvious enough to the censors, it's probably stupid as well. This is, I believe, what Mr Karlin is driving at when he says:


    it may also impose a certain discipline on content producers, forcing them to pick their words with care... most of the greatest “subversive” literature was produced in moderately repressive ancien regimes, not democratic republics with strong freedoms of speech.
     

    Free men should not have to pick their words with care. And I’m decidedly uninterested in taking lessons from dissidents on how to conduct political discussions or write clever subversive novels under the noses of the official Ministry of Truth.

  168. Jake says:
    @Kent Nationalist

    If you are about colonial expansion, you are an imperialist, and imperialism must necessarily always pollute the imperial nation. You cannot have any meaningful Little England while you have the British Empire.
     
    Tories in the 18th century thought differently.

    Blah blah banker freemason blah blah Jews blah blah
     
    Banking would have existed with or without Jews. Anyway what is the problem with banking when it allowed Britain to defeat its historically much more powerful enemy, France, and to spread the English nation across huge parts of the globe? Are you a propagandist for bankers?

    Tories in the 18th century were incorrect. Just like the incorrect American ‘conservatives’ who arrogantly assumed that they could take over from London in dictating to the world without impairing, much less utterly polluting and then destroying, middle American values and ways of life.

    Jewish bankers did not finance the British Empire just to make a profit. They knew that the British Empire would serve their interests, the larger and more long term cultural interests.

    Cromwell and then the Deep State behind the Restoration (of a politically castrated monarchy) and then the ‘Glorious’ Revolution and the founding of Freemasonry knew that they were building an empire to be the anti-Christendom Empire.

    The British Empire murdered Little England as surely as it murdered Ireland and Scotland as necessary steps to create an empire that would please Jewish bankers and the moral and spiritual heirs of Cromwell.

    • Replies: @Kent Nationalist
    Still not seeing an argument here, are you sure you're not really a pro-banker propagandist?
    , @Jake
    You are not that stupid, which means you are duplicitous.
  169. Part of Anatoly Karlin’s article above, is evidence for the theory that the big porn sites must be run by the governments … as the big porn sites are in fact bigger than YouTube. AK writes:

    YouTube operates on an annual loss of a billion dollars. It is something that Alphabet subsidizes for presumably political reasons. No other site can afford to be a YouTube. Videos take up a lot of storage space, and HDD’s don’t come free!

    A couple years back ZeroHedge was doing articles on the porn ‘business’ citing IT zines like TechCruch with stats saying that, e.g., the biggest porn site in the world at that time, XVideos, was at moments taking up 2% of the ENTIRE INTERNET BANDWIDTH OF THE WORLD, ha!

    Apparently the porn sites all have lots of advertising and links to pay-porn sites … but it’s hard to explain how they really supply enough income, given how every teenage kid in the world knows how to get thousands of hours of porn vids for free.

    It’s also notable that the copyright-censorship policing of porn, is very relaxed, versus the much more aggressive policing of recent Hollywood movie releases … It’s almost as if the porn content owners – apparently the USA porn is heavily Jewish in ownership – have a memo to ‘go easy’ on the pirating of their vids on PornHub etc

    Interestingly the Jewish groups like ADL so aggressive against ‘hate speech’ and at the heart of these censorship campaigns, are quite supportive of Jewish porn owners, actresses etc., and don’t hesitate to honour them as Jewish leaders in media, so you see Abe Foxman grinning with his Jewish porn friends etc

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    That's a good point. The "bread and circuses" part is toxic sludge by design while the public forums are getting paved over and turned into slave pens.
    , @Robjil
    Porn is good for destroying will power in men. The many no fap sites on the net talk about this. This is why Jewish power promotes porn. Israelis know this. When they invaded Palestinians towns in 2002, they hacked all the television stations and put on porn.

    http://cosmos.ucc.ie/cs1064/jabowen/IPSC/php/event.php?eid=3562


    "Israeli soldiers broadcast pornography on 3 occupied Palestinian TV stations, the Al-Watan, Ammwaj, and Al-Sharaq channels. A fourth local station, whose premises were not seized by the army, ran a written message across its screen letting people know it was the Israelis who were behind the graphic scenes. “Anything currently shown on Al-Watan and other local TV channels has nothing to do with Palestinian programs but is being broadcast by the Israeli occupation forces, we urge parents to take precautions,” the message said.


    The British use the word wanker to describe foolish,weak persons. British low culture figured this out too.
    , @Robjil
    Porn is good for destroying will power in men. The many no fap sites on the net talk about this. This is why Jewish power promotes porn. Israelis know this. When they invaded Palestinians towns in 2002, they hacked all the television stations and put on porn.

    http://cosmos.ucc.ie/cs1064/jabowen/IPSC/php/event.php?eid=3562


    "Israeli soldiers broadcast pornography on 3 occupied Palestinian TV stations, the Al-Watan, Ammwaj, and Al-Sharaq channels. A fourth local station, whose premises were not seized by the army, ran a written message across its screen letting people know it was the Israelis who were behind the graphic scenes. “Anything currently shown on Al-Watan and other local TV channels has nothing to do with Palestinian programs but is being broadcast by the Israeli occupation forces, we urge parents to take precautions,” the message said.


    The British use the word wanker to describe foolish,weak persons. British low culture figured this out too.
    , @Robjil
    Porn is good for destroying will power in men. The many no fap sites on the net talk about this. This is why Jewish power promotes porn. Israelis know this. When they invaded Palestinians towns in 2002, they hacked all the television stations and put on porn.


    "Israeli soldiers broadcast pornography on 3 occupied Palestinian TV stations, the Al-Watan, Ammwaj, and Al-Sharaq channels. A fourth local station, whose premises were not seized by the army, ran a written message across its screen letting people know it was the Israelis who were behind the graphic scenes. “Anything currently shown on Al-Watan and other local TV channels has nothing to do with Palestinian programs but is being broadcast by the Israeli occupation forces, we urge parents to take precautions,” the message said.


    The British use the word wanker to describe foolish,weak persons. British low culture figured this out too.

  170. @Jake
    Tories in the 18th century were incorrect. Just like the incorrect American 'conservatives' who arrogantly assumed that they could take over from London in dictating to the world without impairing, much less utterly polluting and then destroying, middle American values and ways of life.

    Jewish bankers did not finance the British Empire just to make a profit. They knew that the British Empire would serve their interests, the larger and more long term cultural interests.

    Cromwell and then the Deep State behind the Restoration (of a politically castrated monarchy) and then the 'Glorious' Revolution and the founding of Freemasonry knew that they were building an empire to be the anti-Christendom Empire.

    The British Empire murdered Little England as surely as it murdered Ireland and Scotland as necessary steps to create an empire that would please Jewish bankers and the moral and spiritual heirs of Cromwell.

    Still not seeing an argument here, are you sure you’re not really a pro-banker propagandist?

  171. @Anonymous
    Kent: “I’m a nationalist”
    Also Kent: “The global ‘British’ Empire was good and Jewish-dominated usurious financial manipulation is good for enabling its”
    You goddamn lying cuck.

    I’m a nationalist. I am also for things which make my country stronger. There’s not any contradiction between these two things.

  172. @ThreeCranes
    Alright, boys and girls. Go to your kitchen tap and turn on the water. Now, hold a spoon by the tip of the handle lightly between thumb and forefinger of one hand. With it's back i.e. the convex side, to the down-rushing stream of water, bring the extreme outside face of the cup of the spoon close to the stream until it just barely touches the edge of the flowing column. What happens?

    That's what draws the two ships together. Remember Bernoulli?

    Of course, the CNN announcer woman in her monologue while the clip is being shown says (not exact) “Look how that Russian ship is veering towards our ship!”. Now this is sheer nationalist jingoism. In the real world, the stream of water acts fairly equally upon both. It cares not a whit that one is painted red and the other blue.

    • Replies: @War for Blair Mountain
    I’ll make it simpler for you: The filthy fucking White Whore CNN ANNOUNCER:”Look...the Russian ship is interfering with America’s DIVINE EDICT!!! to impose HOMO PEDERASTY UPON CHRISTIAN RUSSIA...AND SHIA MUSLIM IRAN!!!
  173. Good, I hope Youtube shuts down all commentary. Go back to writing. I don’t have the time to watch your videos (no matter who you are). Write it out. I don’t want to see your neckbeard, have to look at your pimples or look at your weak chin. Go back to writing. I don’t want to be forced to hear your whiny, scratchy voice or listen to you go “ummm” over and over again. I can read your writing much quicker than you can read it on a video. Go back to writing.
    It seems most video commentators either look like they escaped from a Wizard of Oz reboot on Munchkin filming day or they are noodle necked hipsters. The snippets of video I have seen make it plain why so many Alt Right video commentators are incels.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    It's not about you, moron. It's about reaching the populace.

    Step 1: Quarantine truth-tellers by only allowing them to talk among themselves in small, isolated, "free speech" cages.

    Step 2: Blue-pill everyone else undisturbed as much as possible.

    Step 3: Dump the cages into the ocean and receive a standing ovation from the blue-pilled public.

  174. @jimmyriddle
    The Russian authorities and the YouTube censors are both prioritising popular dissident content.

    So, the Russians leave English language conent alone.

    And YT don't bother a channel like Brother Nathaniel (whose entire output consists of "What can I blame the Jews for, today?"). Instead, they go after centre-right anti-globalists like Sargon and Crowder.

    Crowder is a gutless chickenhawk who loved to promote war but never had the balls to sign his name to enlistment papers. He is a big man against idiot college kids, but when faced with grown ups he wets his pants.

  175. “While I do not buy into those two in particular, imagine if YouTube had existed in the 1960s, and it censored “conspiracy theories” portraying the Gulf of Tonkin incident as the “false flag” it turned out to be.”

    So, “conspiracy theory” + time = settled science. Good to know.

  176. “A maritime analogy of the Casimir effect”….American Journal of Physics….maybe yes……maybe this is how nuclear World War Three starts at sea…..

    • Replies: @War for Blair Mountain
    Has anybody seen the video yet?

    Was this incident in the South China Sea an another example of Trump being Putin’s bitch?

  177. @Brabantian
    Literally, 'censorship kills' - Poster that has been hung up recalling Ms Nasim Aghdam, who went into the YouTube offices in San Bruno, California, on 3 April 2018, and opened fire with her 9mm Smith & Wesson pistol, wounding four before allegedly killing herself

    Nasim Aghdam was age 39, born in 1979 to an Iranian family, and identified as a member of the syncretic Shia-offshoot Baha'i religion ... Getting de-monetised & censored on YouTube pushed her over the edge

    YouTube ... You Next, says the poster, images of it popular as memes on 4chan etc
    https://i.ibb.co/HPjKk0Q/Nasim-Aghdam-You-Next-You-Tube-shooter.jpg

    Getting de-monetised & censored on YouTube pushed her over the edge

    You Tube must have hired a lot of guards this week at its headquarters

  178. @iffen
    but why do conservatives lack imagination?

    Because the basic impulse is to keep everything the way it is right now. No need to think about a "better" way.

    One sees this in other aspects of their lives too: the culture/entertainment they consume – and I think consume is the right word; their holiday choices – Spanish/Florida beaches, Vegas, package tours, etc; a preference for familiar chain restaurants and stores that are advertised on TV. In general they are parochial and incurious, characteristics related to lack of imagination.

  179. @prime noticer
    "Conservatives need to move to Twitch."

    an alternative that i hadn't considered, but they already ban people at the drop of a hat with no warning under questionable TOS violations for non-political content, so i doubt they'd have any qualms about banning conservative streamers if somebody told them to do so.

    and amazon owns twitch. so eventually. they would be told to do so.

    bezos is less interested and less engaged with the left and their crusade. but amazon still bans books here and there. it wouldn't be an issue to ban a popular conservative streamer. people are there to watch videos games. nobody would come to defend conservative politics guy.

    also, i'm under the impression that the game-o-sphere has a really vocal and aggressive leftist minority. they alone would probably raise enough complaints to get a conservative deep sixed.

    also, there's less opportunity to BE political on twitch. you'd be able to be about as rightist as pewdiepie, or a little less. and that's best case scenario. you will have 1% of his audience as well.

    Dang. Never mind then. Forget Twitch.

    Too bad Vimeo is not an open platform. But they probably pull the same shit, being founded by “Jack Klein”.

  180. Orwellian state, coming to a screen near you.

    Ron Unz needs to start a YouTube alternative.

    • Replies: @War for Blair Mountain
    Look...Trump is a filthy cockroach married to a filthy fucking Slovenian Whore with vaginal and anal warts.....and she had these vaginal and anal warts before she met Donald....just ask Billy from Arkansas.....Billy Clinton.....Billy got there first before Donald.........and Billy Clinton was waiting in a long line before he got his turn......
  181. @War for Blair Mountain
    “A maritime analogy of the Casimir effect”....American Journal of Physics....maybe yes......maybe this is how nuclear World War Three starts at sea.....

    Has anybody seen the video yet?

    Was this incident in the South China Sea an another example of Trump being Putin’s bitch?

    • Replies: @AnonFromTN
    Shouldn’t we remember that it is South China Sea, not South US Sea? Doesn’t it give the only correct perspective on the events?
  182. it suggests that their success is achieved through genetic privilege, as opposed to their own hard work and moral superiority.

    Genetic “privilege” is not opposed, but rather a pre-requisite to hard work and moral superiority.

  183. @Priss Factor
    In real estate, Location Location Location.

    In Big Tech, it's Jews, Jews, Jews.

    Hi Priss.

    Allow me to add just a few words to your concise truism.

    ‘In Big Tech censorship, search manipulation, and deplatforming, it’s Jews, Jews, Jews.’

    • Agree: Republic
  184. @Tired of Not Winning
    Orwellian state, coming to a screen near you.

    Ron Unz needs to start a YouTube alternative.

    Look…Trump is a filthy cockroach married to a filthy fucking Slovenian Whore with vaginal and anal warts…..and she had these vaginal and anal warts before she met Donald….just ask Billy from Arkansas…..Billy Clinton…..Billy got there first before Donald………and Billy Clinton was waiting in a long line before he got his turn……

  185. And very credible rumors have it that Donald had to wait in line again to do the dirty deed with the old wrinkly Queen 0f England……Billy Clinton from Hot Springs Arkansas was directly ahead of Donald Trump to fuck the wrinkly old Queen Mother…….Donald Trump….What a LOSER!!!!….always waiting behind Billy Clinton to fuck old wrinkly SYPHYLLITIC whores……..This is who you voted for….

    • Replies: @War for Blair Mountain
    The Queen Mother of England sure did fuck her way to the top......the top of a pile of raw untreated sewage.....
  186. @Justvisiting
    The Republicans believe in putting the car in neutral while we head down-hill towards the cliff--the Democrats want to jam their foot on the accelerator.

    What’s funny is the “Mexican overdrive” will often times get you there quicker than WOT(wide open throttle), especially if the hill is steep, which it most certainly is.

  187. Anatoly Karlin has put so much material I just cannot address most of his points. As usual, I agree & disagree with some of his points, but it would take me too long (due to my ineradicable laziness) to tackle even a few.

    Suffice to say our chief points of disagreement lie in what I’d call fundamental world-view. I tend to agree with Gandhi: In the end deceivers deceive only themselves. But enough with ethico-religious differences; let’s see if anything constructive can be said.

    1. I think that developed West’s world-view is dominated by humanitarian-egalitarian-democratic- secularist -liberal-forcibly conformist- globalist-anti-national- faux individualist, i.e. ego-centric – hedonist – consumerist – …. “values”. This is a natural culmination of centuries of Western culture & its various strands.

    I also happen to think that this all is vulnerable & can in a very short period of time, due to radically altered material/way of life/energy circumstances, turn into almost cannibal super- fascist “civilization”, which could without remorse eliminate hundreds of millions, even billions of other human beings & completely dispense with anything humanist & democratic (also, it can collapse into a dystopian chaos beyond remedy).

    What the future holds, I don’t know. For instance, all predictions from 1900 for 1950, turned out to be laughable; they were not in Wolfgang Pauli’s saying “not even wrong”.

    2. as regards IQ- I don’t think public discussion of it is of any real importance. We all know that whites are the best & brightest; Asians are best zombies; blacks are dumb & not cut out for any type of modern civilization (except for some sports & rather idiotic forms of entertainment).

    Serious academic discussions on IQ have no real consequences, whatever their champions think of it. Whether it is possible to boost IQ through genetic engineering – I don’t know. Let’s not forget that the project of controlled nuclear fusion has been with us since 1950s & as yet, nothing serious came of it. Cloning is a few decades old; nothing spectacular.

    Future of genetic engineering in next 20-50 years with regard to transformation of homo sapiens- I very much doubt anything significant will come out of it.

    2. as for censorship of social networks, the author is completely right. Yet, what is expected from the contemporary Western culture? It is forcibly egalitarian & conformist & anti-individualist. Alt-right & other silly currents play no importance in the future of the West. No ideas & discussions do.

    3. true, many controversial & interesting contents have been removed from Youtube. But, they’ve been moved either to other sites & or made available somewhere else. For instance, perhaps the best antisemitic propaganda film, “The Eternal Jew”, can be seen at archive.org; others on Dailymotion.
    What is really visceral & makes one’s blood boil – black on white crime; migrant dysfunction & violence; Islamic savagery; whites in South Africa; Israeli plotting; African savagery; Mestizo drug-related crime & savagery; racial & religious-cultural & national eternal conflict… all can be easily found on Youtube & other sites. It’s there.

    4. if you type top 20 videos on Youtube, you’ll get idiotic & clownish “songs” & similar rubbish. More, the number of visitors is immaterial- people frequently go to see something not because they agree with the content, but to gloat over other people’s idiocy. Korean Gangnam something….

    5. as for Russians, I don’t know too much. All I can say that re politics, videos are of no importance- at least, that’s what I think. It is so because most people have formed their opinions on gut feelings & no amount of analysis, left or right, will change this. For most non-Russians, visual content of Russia is: pretty girls singing beautiful songs & weird traffic-crime accidents. Everything else is of tertiary importance.

    • Replies: @ricpic
    "...all predictions from 1900 for 1950 turned out to be laughable..."

    That's true if you consider the rather shallow types in the prediction business. But in fact many of the greatest artists of the late nineteenth century "predicted" catastrophe in the sense that their work was almost without relief pessimistic and filled with a sense of doom. Strinberg, Ibsen, Dostoevsky, Nietzsche (more an artist than philosopher) the great Norwegian painter of The Scream (can't think of his name)...the list could easily go on. All work filled with dread and doom. They sensed what was coming.
  188. It is and always was pretty clear to fair-minded people that YouTube, just like Google, Twitter, Facebook, Wiki, and lots of other web platforms, is subservient to narrow interests of a certain group (we all know who). So, it is and always was naïve to expect it to behave fairly. The only remedy is to create other venues, like Unz, until total censorship of the Internet comes to “free” and “democratic” societies. The first step in this direction is taken: thanks to the US Congress, Internet neutrality is already killed. Stay tuned.

  189. @DJS
    @AK: I think six of the above comments explained again and again that there is no network effect on YT. None of the fash videos are ever shown on the "related" sidebar, and YT does not host a individual-to-individual recommendation system of any sort.

    You need to make good videos, and stop worrying about technicalities. I remember trying to get my social network onto Telegram, and getting all sorts of lame excuses about Whatsapp's superiority. In the event, I realized that people who refused to install a second messaging app on their phone were not talkative, at least to me, on Whatsapp. It wasn't the platform, it was the content that didn't attract.

    Conversely, I visit Liveleaks a fee times a month, despite the horrible player. They have good stuff. I like videos with Gypsies caught stealing and receiving extrajudicial corrections.

    Second, if Ramzpaul has 3 videos a week, each with 5K views, each consuming 50 MB, that's 750 GB a week. Most of these numbers would be lower for these people, or for you. In fact, you can bet on a viewership an order of magnitude smaller. If you feel insulted by the 500 views I predicted for you, buy 50 dollars's worth of ads every month, until they ban you. If anything, my professional website has unlimited traffic, and costs some 10 dollars a month.

    Just make your stuff, and, yes, spend money on it, if you are committed to it. Don't worry about the money (see below) or the platform. You are not a professional specialist in social media, so how would worrying change anything? I can worry as much as I want about brain surgery, but chances are I'll never get a brain operation right.

    Because, finally, there is something fundamentally wrong with the way everybody approaches monetization. Dick Morris or Sloppy Steve got pennies from the TV stations. They made their money from his political masters. There is no market for opinions, in the way you imagine. There is a market for bootlickers, and another market for advertisement-inflated entertainers. You would be neither. Most of the people who complain about demonetization are neither, and probably make money by waiting tables, when they don't post smart-ass vlogs.

    Long story short, make good videos, if your heart is in it, and stop worrying about platforms or profit.

    OTOH, you may want to think hard if it makes any sense to speak to 500 people. To use the above example, Ramzpaul doesn't seem fazed, since many videos uploaded by PBS, TYT, RT are at the same level. But do you?

    @iffen: There is no difference about a "freedom fighter" opposing Communism during the Soviet-era and an islamist demanding Sharia for New Hampshire. The majority of the sane people go with the flow, in particular when the "dissident" narrative is pushed by enemy governments (Radio Free Europe in the eighties; Press TV and Saudi-sponsored madrasas today). There is no reason to idolize a handful of operatives and useful idiots.

    @anon: Red states are hardly able to upkeep their schools (check their SAT scores) and their hospitals (see their life expectancy).

    Also, you were supposedly woke enough (or is it anti-woke?) to believe, without questioning, that the state can't do anything, schools, hospitals, or video streaming websites. I wish I could explain it it to you, it's some sophistry said by Thatcher or Reagan. I don't know how to explain it, but I know the short version. I think it boils down to "governments can't do shit", although it may be limited to governments ran by Thatcher, Reagan, Piyush, and Nimrata.

    @jeff stryker: You seem to be disconnected from real life. There are several vlogs made by East Europeans who work as truckers in US. They think it's cool to make 45K a year as a contractor, because it sounds a lot more than at home. The general feeling is that the the "white truckers" you describe don't exist, and very few Americans still work in trucking.

    Perhaps you are so disconnected that I need to explain to you how US agriculture works. Three quarters of agricultural workers in US are foreign born. Almost a half of the total are illegals. See https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/charts/63465/legalstatus2014_450px.png?v=1467 You and your imaginary "white workers" can block your asses in an office chair.

    Also, what's with the guns? We're talking about YT censorship. Do you think that if everyone had big guns, YT would have trembled in fear? Why not add something about stem cell research, to go full retard?

    There is no market for opinions, in the way you imagine. There is a market for bootlickers, and another market for advertisement-inflated entertainers

    NAILED IT.

    One caveat: the ‘Remnant’ types (to pinch Gary North’s term) do value ideas and their analysis, although by and large they take a dim view of anyone who thinks their opinions are of such high quality that they merit a paywall.

    It’s the old Catch-22; anyone who thinks they’ve got opinions that people should pay for, guarantees that their audience consists of people within sigma of the median… [I had to write ‘sigma’ in full because I’m using fucking iShit… this fucking iPad Pro has no mechanism for inserting Greek letters – but gives me a choice of a thousand fucktarded emojis. That alone tells you about the psycho metrics of their target market].

  190. Anon[277] • Disclaimer says:
    @Mr McKenna

    YT don’t bother a channel like Brother Nathaniel (whose entire output consists of “What can I blame the Jews for, today?”). Instead, they go after centre-right anti-globalists like Sargon and Crowder.
     
    They'll very seldom deplatform clowns. Clowns serve a valuable purpose in de-legitimating the opposition. Look how ridiculous our critics are!

    Meanwhile, I don't watch videos so what happens (or doesn't) on YouTube doesn't matter much to me.

    And a very wise man once said: whatever the censors would cut out, should be cut out. Because if it's obvious enough to the censors, it's probably stupid as well. This is, I believe, what Mr Karlin is driving at when he says:


    it may also impose a certain discipline on content producers, forcing them to pick their words with care... most of the greatest “subversive” literature was produced in moderately repressive ancien regimes, not democratic republics with strong freedoms of speech.
     

    “And a very wise man once said: whatever the censors would cut out, should be cut out. Because if it’s obvious enough to the censors, it’s probably stupid as well.”

    That seems a bit too cute to be true. However, there are likely more than a few cases like Stirner’s The Ego & His Own, where the anticipated censorship failed to occur, because the Prussian censor thought the book was too silly to be dangerous.

  191. @War for Blair Mountain
    Has anybody seen the video yet?

    Was this incident in the South China Sea an another example of Trump being Putin’s bitch?

    Shouldn’t we remember that it is South China Sea, not South US Sea? Doesn’t it give the only correct perspective on the events?

    • Replies: @Republic
    That naval incident occurred in the East China Sea, not the South China Sea
  192. @216
    The only solution that I think is lasting is nationalization.

    Google, Apple, Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter, Amazon.

    Uncucked red states should consider a "sovereign Internet".

    The problem with this is that the EU, European governments, Britain, Canada and New Zealand have been some of the biggest drivers for this censorship, and demanding YouTube and other sites do more to shut down “hate” for a couple of years now, including with ultimatums, threats to legislate etc.

  193. @Anatoly Karlin
    Please keep off topic posts to the current Open Thread.

    If you are new to my work, start here.

    ***

    As reiner Tor points out, this was also probably a sign from God not to engage in vlogging. Since it now seems there is no way to be famous, edgy, and uncensored on YouTube, I am probably going to deprioritize these plans going forwards. I suppose it is good that it happened now, before I invested any significant time or energy into this enterprise (apart from ordering a mini-tripod for my smartphone). As for using Russian alternatives, apart from the aforementioned problem of all the significant Russians being on YouTube as well, I am certainly not going to be talking about Dagestani IQs on Russian platforms (i.e. for the same reason that German nationalists use VK over Facebook).

    Once again Anatoly you seem to miss the important part: Youtube, Google, Instagram, Facebook and so forth are controlled by whom……The Fucking Mennonites and Amish …..Right! No the Magic Jews who run everything in the economic, social, and political pathways of this country and the world. This is just part of their plan to Dehumanize everyone who disagrees with their beliefs that they are the superior races and we must obey them.

    Lenin (who was part Jewish) used mass murder. Today’s Jewish Mob and their friends use mass social dehumanization.

  194. It would so much better if the Silicon Valley overlords were just greedy.

  195. anonymous[151] • Disclaimer says:

    Hey Karlin, what’s up with the photo on the side? Fancy yourself the crusading christian warrior, yeh? Lol!

    Don’t you pussy armchair warriors know that true warriors do not pose in such a cheesy manner?

    Anyway, I take great pleasure that those alt-right hateful losers (including you, of course) have been denied their begging bowl.

    • LOL: WHAT
  196. Acceleration is good.

    This will radicalize more people.

    In my experience, this kind of heavy handedness does not scare people, it just makes people double down with even more determination.

    The victimization of David Duke made him formidable. Same with Mike Enoch.

    And the censorship simply proves that the critics of jewish power are 100% correct.

    In the end, the jews’ paranoia will be their downfall. The very thing they dread will come upon them and it will be because of their own insane actions. It’s a very weird hermetic system revealing the same old pattern in the nazi/nose cycle.

    White people do not respond well to tyranny.

    • Replies: @awry

    This will radicalize more people.

     

    Who knows, maybe that's the end goal.

    The very thing they dread will come upon them and it will be because of their own insane actions. It’s a very weird hermetic system revealing the same old pattern in the nazi/nose cycle.
     
    (((They))) already ran through this cycle several times, and at the end it was (((them))) who laughed last, until now. Where are Egypt, Assyria, Babylon, Persia, Rome, Russia, Germany now? Well some of them still exist in some form and (((they))) still regard them as their arch enemies, or (((they))) made them their most submissive bitches licking (((their))) boots (I could have used some other word, but let's not be vulgar). Or both.

    White people do not respond well to tyranny.
     
    White people are on the road to extinction. Maybe (((they))) want to incite a last desperate white rebellion that (((they))) can put down and cement (((their))) rule over the world.
  197. @jeff stryker
    Hillary Clinton would have turned the US into one giant backward socialist ghetto possibly at war with both Ukraine and Syria.

    However, Bill Clinton inherited an early nineties recession and managed to pull the US out of it fairly quickly.

    He also managed to reduce high crime rates. End a crack epidemic.

    Bill Clinton left office with a surplus budget not a deficit.

    Whatever good you experienced while the Clinton co-presidency was in office had nothing to do with them or anything they did. You sound as though you believe that presidents can actually control an economy and and improve a society.

    You really should stop huffing glue while you watch TV.

    • Replies: @jeff stryker
    ...why was the economy better then?
  198. @AnonFromTN
    Shouldn’t we remember that it is South China Sea, not South US Sea? Doesn’t it give the only correct perspective on the events?

    That naval incident occurred in the East China Sea, not the South China Sea

    • Replies: @AnonFromTN
    It’s still “China Sea”, no? Thousands of miles away from the US, according to the map. I don’t recall China ever inviting the US Navy there. Am I missing something?
  199. anonymous[151] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anatoly Karlin

    What are YouTube’s network effects?
     
    Recommendations. You get vast numbers of new people getting funneled onto your channel e.g. you watch Molyneux --> JF Gariepy.

    Viewership is systemically higher than for similar profile blogs by up to an order of magnitude. For instance, the typical video by the psychometrist Edward Dutton – probably the most high profile HBD vlogger – gets around 10,000-20,000 views. I am reasonably sure that this is well above what the typical article by James Thompson here gets. My most popular “HBD” article ever – The Idiocy of the Average – got something like 40,000 views if I remember correctly. The Golden One, a Swedish alt right pagan bodybuilder, has 100,000 subscribers, and most of his videos – rather low effort productions with minimal editing or effects – get at least 20,000 views.

    The Alt Right child prodigy “soph” – recently profiled by Mr. Bernstein – is currently just shy of a million subscribers on YouTube. She has had 17 million views since she started her (rather irregular) vlogging career in August 2015. That’s approximately what the Unz Review currently generates in half a year, and we have far, far more visitors now than even just a couple of years ago.

    But can’t websites just host their own videos?
     
    I have no experience with this, but AFAIK hosting videos yourself is more complicated than with just a text/image blog. You'll need to get your own hosting, you generally can't do that on outside platforms, not for free anyway (e.g. on Wordpress.com you need to buy video hosting and its quite costly). Now I recommend self hosting + regular backups anyway for any dissident these days anyway, I am amazed that Heartiste largely neglected that. But AFAIK with video bandwidth usage becomes a major constraint so it can get expensive fast.

    The Alt Right child prodigy “soph”

    Goes to show that young age is no protective shield for the whisperings of Satan.

    If she continues along this path, then I wish her a long life… so that the pain can match her spiritual transgressions, see?

  200. @Twodees Partain
    Whatever good you experienced while the Clinton co-presidency was in office had nothing to do with them or anything they did. You sound as though you believe that presidents can actually control an economy and and improve a society.

    You really should stop huffing glue while you watch TV.

    …why was the economy better then?

    • Replies: @Chris Mallory
    Because the first two years of Clinton rule gave Republicans control of the House for the first time in 40 years and control of the Senate for the first time in 8 years. Clinton had split government for 6 of his 8 years. Since the House is where all revenue measures must start the House has a bit of control over the economy.
  201. THIS IS PART 1 OF 4 MEANING WATCH ALL 4. Dont fall for the strong delusion because the end is shortly after.

  202. @jeff stryker
    VIRAL


    Except that the deplorable white proles (Previously known as "peasants") have the power to cut off the food supply because they grow the food. Of course in America most of these people themselves rely on Wal-Mart, fuel and Opoid rehab centers. Still, if the farmers and truckers simply ceased transporting goods (As Reed has mentioned) to Manhattan (THEY) would be cannibals in three days.

    The same is true in UK. Food is not grown in Mayor Khan's backyard. If UK farmers cut the food supply to London for a single fortnight, that is all she wrote.

    Tacitly, this is why black rioting in the US no longer matters. People don't care if there is rioting in Baltimore or Ferguson and blacks burn down their crack houses. After a few days of this, they will simply be hungry, having burned down the local curry take out and having no agriculture, so they simply stop rioting.

    On the other hand since (THEY) are backed by the Pentagon, it is possible that the military might resort to martial law and simply seize farmer's produce. This would probably happen because officers on the East Coast beltway would also feel the effect of having middle-american deplorables cut off the food supply.

    Except that the deplorable white proles (Previously known as “peasants”) have the power to cut off the food supply because they grow the food.

    That worked out really well for the kulaks.

    • Replies: @iffen
    That worked out really well for the kulaks.

    Whether one was a kulak or a peasant was determined by who had the gun.
  203. @prime noticer
    this site will be gone within 1 or 2 years of trump leaving office.

    so enjoy bashing trump while you can, for not being the perfect president. yep, it sucks he's failed on some issues. been good on other issues. best course of action as always is to continue to press him to deliver. he's the only option, so keep holding his feet to the fire. worst course of action by far is bitterly posting about how MAGA was a mistake and hoping for him to be gone. it just makes you sound like a 12 year old complaining because he didn't get everything he wanted for christmas. wah wah, my expectations were unrealistic, he was supposed to turn around 70 years of jewish country destruction in 2 years.

    things will go straight downhill under the next democrat president. that will have a silver lining. at least i won't have to hear fringe rightists continuously bash one of the few republican presidents to actually try, even if he didn't deliver on all fronts. instead, there will be a relaxing silence, as all the rightists bashing trump get exactly what they've been hoping for, good and hard.

    I was actually kinda sympathetic to your argument until I came to this:

    … he was supposed to turn around 70 years of jewish country destruction in 2 years.

    The problem is not merely that Trump has failed to “turn around” Jewish destruction. No, he has actually dialed up the Zionism to eleven. He moved our embassy to Jerusalem, kept troops in Syria (contrary to his campaign promises), is sending Jared Kushner to the ME to offer the Palestinians terms of surrender (good luck with that), and now the constant sabre-rattling against Iran.

    I don’t care what the New York Times says, one thing Trump is not is an ‘anti-semite’.

    • Agree: Robert Dolan
  204. @Jaakko Raipala

    Except that the deplorable white proles (Previously known as “peasants”) have the power to cut off the food supply because they grow the food.
     
    That worked out really well for the kulaks.

    That worked out really well for the kulaks.

    Whether one was a kulak or a peasant was determined by who had the gun.

    • Replies: @Jaakko Raipala
    Well, the point kind of was that rural resistance to city based communist coups historically tended to end up with rural peasants being starved by the urban commies, not with the cities starving.
  205. anonymous[151] • Disclaimer says:
    @Tired of Not Winning
    Google and Facebook both need to go out of business. YouTube used to be good.

    Conservatives need to move to Twitch.

    A most appropriate platform for all you degenerate lowlifes exists already… it is called Hellfire.

    The sooner y’all move there, the better for all us normal* people. 😀

    *normal people are those who have no particular ill-will against other normal people, except for racist lowlifes, whom we hate viscerally.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    fuck you you see no problem with attack white people thats okay to you
  206. What if through genetic testing, these same people discover a genetic malady that makes them believe they have all the answers, and discourse is not necessary when they talk.

  207. The Trust Project: Big Media and Silicon Valley’s Weaponized Algorithms Silence Dissent

    Given the Trust Project’s rich-get-richer impact on the online news landscape, it is not surprising to find that it is funded by a confluence of tech oligarchs and powerful forces with a clear stake in controlling the flow of news.
    by Whitney Webb

    https://www.mintpressnews.com/the-trust-project-big-media-and-silicon-valleys-weaponized-algorithms-silence-dissent/259030/

  208. @nickels
    It makes things easier, really. Now, to find out the truth, just tune in to youtube and invert everything you hear.
    It is a blessing in disguise. Talking was becoming a crutch. The will move dissidence into the sphere of connections in the real world.
    They just destroyed their best sedative.
    I started dowloading gigs of videos last year. If anyone needs to find videos on why the aliens who did 9/11 planned the whole thing in Antarctica after subverting all the penguins and recruiting to jews to push the whole agenda through the third reich-just hit me up.

    …to find out the truth, just tune in to youtube and invert everything you hear.

    You are onto something here for sure.

    Talking was becoming a crutch. The will move dissidence into the sphere of connections in the real world.

    Precisely.

    Not even that, in fact. Smart people can and will be able to use technology to exchange ideas and thoughts. In the coming stage information and (action) plans.

    The idea, vision and will are important. All the rest, Internet included, is just a tool.

    Before, it was a written letter and 9mm handgun.
    Next time it will be encrypted and compressed small binary blob sent over IoT and remote controlled (very small) drone. Or similar.

  209. @DreadIlk
    None of this shit matters until regular conversations on all dissident sites are about homesteads. The hold on power by the current regime is tenuous. While people are fat and lazy they will not fight. However once resources dry up and they get told to sit down and shut up they will do the repeat of what always happened in history. Russia. China. Etc.

    What you need to concern your self with is not finding your self in the meat grinder.

    While people are fat and lazy they will not fight. However once resources dry up and they get told to sit down and shut up they will do the repeat of what always happened in history.

    They will certainly try.
    Will they succeed is another matter altogether.

  210. Delete that last photo of Gavin McGinnes.

    • Replies: @homahr
    LOL why
  211. Is Bitchute an option for alt-right content producers?

  212. @War for Blair Mountain
    And very credible rumors have it that Donald had to wait in line again to do the dirty deed with the old wrinkly Queen 0f England......Billy Clinton from Hot Springs Arkansas was directly ahead of Donald Trump to fuck the wrinkly old Queen Mother.......Donald Trump....What a LOSER!!!!....always waiting behind Billy Clinton to fuck old wrinkly SYPHYLLITIC whores........This is who you voted for....

    The Queen Mother of England sure did fuck her way to the top……the top of a pile of raw untreated sewage…..

  213. It’s a leftwing Jew-led Kristallnacht against rightwing people of Anglo origin. Are people having their businesses and ability to earn a living destroyed? You bet. The comparison fits.

    • Agree: Robert Dolan
  214. @jeff stryker
    ...why was the economy better then?

    Because the first two years of Clinton rule gave Republicans control of the House for the first time in 40 years and control of the Senate for the first time in 8 years. Clinton had split government for 6 of his 8 years. Since the House is where all revenue measures must start the House has a bit of control over the economy.

    • Replies: @jeff stryker
    MALLORY


    The House spent most of their time pursuing Clinton over his ill-advised fetish for chubby Jewish girls.

    It was Clinton himself who cut defense funding (Of course he was fortunate enough to preside between Berlin and 9-11) and raised taxes on the rich slightly.

    And the Senate and house were still Republican when Bush was elected and the US went downhill.
  215. Anonymous[100] • Disclaimer says:
    @Brabantian
    Part of Anatoly Karlin's article above, is evidence for the theory that the big porn sites must be run by the governments ... as the big porn sites are in fact bigger than YouTube. AK writes:

    YouTube operates on an annual loss of a billion dollars. It is something that Alphabet subsidizes for presumably political reasons. No other site can afford to be a YouTube. Videos take up a lot of storage space, and HDD’s don’t come free!
     
    A couple years back ZeroHedge was doing articles on the porn 'business' citing IT zines like TechCruch with stats saying that, e.g., the biggest porn site in the world at that time, XVideos, was at moments taking up 2% of the ENTIRE INTERNET BANDWIDTH OF THE WORLD, ha!

    Apparently the porn sites all have lots of advertising and links to pay-porn sites ... but it's hard to explain how they really supply enough income, given how every teenage kid in the world knows how to get thousands of hours of porn vids for free.

    It's also notable that the copyright-censorship policing of porn, is very relaxed, versus the much more aggressive policing of recent Hollywood movie releases ... It's almost as if the porn content owners - apparently the USA porn is heavily Jewish in ownership - have a memo to 'go easy' on the pirating of their vids on PornHub etc

    Interestingly the Jewish groups like ADL so aggressive against 'hate speech' and at the heart of these censorship campaigns, are quite supportive of Jewish porn owners, actresses etc., and don't hesitate to honour them as Jewish leaders in media, so you see Abe Foxman grinning with his Jewish porn friends etc

    That’s a good point. The “bread and circuses” part is toxic sludge by design while the public forums are getting paved over and turned into slave pens.

  216. anonymous[763] • Disclaimer says:
    @ThreeCranes

    "Don’t try and tell me they’re not trying to turn us into sheep."
     
    With the rise of women in the workforce and especially in secondary and university education, there has been a concomitant war on the manly virtues of valor and gallantry.

    Use to be, poets immortalized their civilization's heroes by singing tales of their gallantry and sacrifice. Men fighting to the end when death was all but certain were commemorated and thus granted immortality--as much anyway as can be achieved by mere mortal men.

    Today, with the tearing down of statues and the feminine war on martial virtue, all that is lost. Bravery is no longer considered worthy. Instead, women teachers--and internet censors--promote a sedated, docile keypuncher as the ideal male.

    This goes against the grain of the Universe and won't end well.

    With the rise of women in the workforce

    Women were always in the workforce, buddy.

    Use to be, poets immortalized their civilization’s heroes by singing tales of their gallantry and sacrifice.

    Translation: paid propagandists got the dumbest of the dumb, the ideal cannon fodder to kill and die for someone else wealth and power.

    valor and gallantry.

    You live in wrong century, this trash you are peddling was obsolete 100 years ago. If only you were born earlier, you too could be a hero, you too could prove your manly valor against poison gas and machine gun fire.

    So sad.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Martial provess and bravery was always highly praised because it was absolutely crucial for survival. Your ancestors knew it and that's the only reason you're alive and have a country to call your own.

    It's ok to be able and ready to defend yourself. Just ask your wife's boyfriend.
    , @ThreeCranes
    "paid propagandists got the dumbest of the dumb, the ideal cannon fodder to kill and die for someone else"

    "You live in wrong century, this trash you are peddling was obsolete 100 years ago."

    As I said, "Bravery is no longer considered worthy. Instead, women teachers–and internet censors–promote a sedated, docile keypuncher as the ideal male."

    You have proven my very point. Thank you.

  217. @jeff stryker
    IFFEN


    Do you think most African-Americans or Mexicans would support Red State whites who want to reduce Federal taxes, cancel out Section 8, remove EBT and cut government spending on programs that give blacks or other minorities Affirmative Action jobs?

    Do you really think Jews, blacks, Mexicans and Asians have the same homesteading mentality as heritage Americans who live in a Red State? Is this is even a question a four year old would not have the answer to?

    Why do you think Jews, blacks, Mexicans and Asians live on the coast? Diversified economy. Money. Glorified poker games on Wall Street or IT stuff. None of these people are involved in primary economies like Red States are.

    The idea these "masses" would support freedom fighters running around the Ozarks or Montana is absurd.

    A good number of blacks would join the military if it declared martial law on these "freedom fighters" merely so they could storm the houses of farmers in Red States and rape their daughters. You think some politician like Octavio who is Latino is going to hesitate in ordering her National Guard troops to declare martial law. State governors in New Mexico might withdraw their troops from the border but they will happily massacre a Red State white rural "resistance". Black and Hispanic NCO's would tell their infantry "You may rape, but discreetly" and then you would see war crimes visited on white rural women unseen since Russians invaded Germany in World War II.

    The entire Red State idiom runs against what urban Blue States believe in-Mexicans, Italian-Americans on the East Coast, Hindus, Jews, blacks, Muslims are all tribal/extended clan mentalities who cannot relate to Clint Eastwood and John Wayne attitudes about "freedom" and "individualism" and "self-reliance". If you have not noticed, Democrats want gun control.

    So there is no support for resistance fighters. Blacks and Mestizos and Jews and Asians who like big government are not going get behind that.

    Are you really that much of a cowardly cuck that you are afraid of an army of blacks and Mexicans? Black and Mexicans hate each other. You really think they will ally together?
    Remember, Jeffy boy, you are the one who ran off to Asia because you were too afraid to walk the streets in the USA.

    When we want your opinion on the military might of the black population, we will go out back and look for a cow pie.

    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
    Well....you are partly right.

    I worked with non-whites for many years. Yes, the mexicans ran the blacks out of South Central, and for the most part they hate each other.

    HOWEVER......both groups are absolutely unified in their hatred of white people.

    Asians don't like blacks either, but Asians hate whites more than they hate blacks, so they vote left too.

    The rainbow coalition is held together by hatred of whites, and they are taught to hate whites by the jews at the top.

    Essentially, jews weaponized ALL of the non-whites (and gays) against white Christian people.

    hispanic youth imitate black youth culture. hispanic youths listen to rap, wear "saggin" pants, caps backwards, tats, etc.

    The hispanics say, "Can't be white so we gotta act black."

    Yes, it's extraordinarily weird. The first time I saw young latinos acting black I was really stunned and confused. After a few years I just got used to the silliness.

    hispanics have also fallen into the black's R reproductive strategies, with their males having sex with as many women as they can, baby mommas everywhere, and lots of fatherless young men that usually turn to crime. I'm not sure, but I imagine that at one time the hispanics' Catholicism used to keep the family cohesive, but for the most part I fear that has fallen by the wayside.

    If the SHTF, it will be EVERYBODY AGAINST WHITEY.
    , @jeff stryker
    MALLORY


    It was not so much fear as a desire for a better quality of life. Michigan is freezing cold and the job market is no better than Asia, so why hang around?

    I've got college buddies from Flint and Greater Detroit who mortgaged houses and married right out of college. Now their property is worth nothing and they are trapped in The Great American Rustbelt.

    And yes, you can move to the sticks and maybe open an antique shop. But these sort of small towns and cities are fairly remote and cliquish.

    Dubai, Mumbai and Asia were not out in the boondocks but buzzing. I had some bad experiences with a few Indians and Filipinos, but nothing like the life-and-death situations one can run into on a budget in a city like Phoenix full of roving Mexican gangs.

  218. anonymous[763] • Disclaimer says:
    @John Burns, Gettysburg Partisan
    They've actually de-monetized extremely innocuous stuff long before this new wave.

    For example: there are a few YouTube channels I watch that feature footage of people hunting deer and other American wild game. They show how to hunt; how to harvest the animals; and how too cook them. These videos get only a few thousand views, if that, and are not out to hurt anyone.

    But they show how to kill a deer, which was apparently bad, so YouTube de-monetized all of these guys's videos (no reason was offered, of course), which made it less worthwhile for them to make good videos.

    This is actually really, really bad. It's not just that we can't have our politics. YouTube is or was useful for people showing other people how to do practical real things. Like hunting. They're even getting rid of that stuff. Don't try and tell me they're not trying to turn us into sheep.

    If killing defenseless animals from a distance is “brave” and “manly”, then the illegal Mexican immigrant working in slaughterhouse killing thousands of animals per day is 1000x braver and manlier than you.
    Deal with it.

  219. Anonymous[100] • Disclaimer says:
    @Chris Mallory
    Good, I hope Youtube shuts down all commentary. Go back to writing. I don't have the time to watch your videos (no matter who you are). Write it out. I don't want to see your neckbeard, have to look at your pimples or look at your weak chin. Go back to writing. I don't want to be forced to hear your whiny, scratchy voice or listen to you go "ummm" over and over again. I can read your writing much quicker than you can read it on a video. Go back to writing.
    It seems most video commentators either look like they escaped from a Wizard of Oz reboot on Munchkin filming day or they are noodle necked hipsters. The snippets of video I have seen make it plain why so many Alt Right video commentators are incels.

    It’s not about you, moron. It’s about reaching the populace.

    Step 1: Quarantine truth-tellers by only allowing them to talk among themselves in small, isolated, “free speech” cages.

    Step 2: Blue-pill everyone else undisturbed as much as possible.

    Step 3: Dump the cages into the ocean and receive a standing ovation from the blue-pilled public.

  220. @Republic
    That naval incident occurred in the East China Sea, not the South China Sea

    It’s still “China Sea”, no? Thousands of miles away from the US, according to the map. I don’t recall China ever inviting the US Navy there. Am I missing something?

  221. @Chris Mallory
    Are you really that much of a cowardly cuck that you are afraid of an army of blacks and Mexicans? Black and Mexicans hate each other. You really think they will ally together?
    Remember, Jeffy boy, you are the one who ran off to Asia because you were too afraid to walk the streets in the USA.

    When we want your opinion on the military might of the black population, we will go out back and look for a cow pie.

    Well….you are partly right.

    I worked with non-whites for many years. Yes, the mexicans ran the blacks out of South Central, and for the most part they hate each other.

    HOWEVER……both groups are absolutely unified in their hatred of white people.

    Asians don’t like blacks either, but Asians hate whites more than they hate blacks, so they vote left too.

    The rainbow coalition is held together by hatred of whites, and they are taught to hate whites by the jews at the top.

    Essentially, jews weaponized ALL of the non-whites (and gays) against white Christian people.

    hispanic youth imitate black youth culture. hispanic youths listen to rap, wear “saggin” pants, caps backwards, tats, etc.

    The hispanics say, “Can’t be white so we gotta act black.”

    Yes, it’s extraordinarily weird. The first time I saw young latinos acting black I was really stunned and confused. After a few years I just got used to the silliness.

    hispanics have also fallen into the black’s R reproductive strategies, with their males having sex with as many women as they can, baby mommas everywhere, and lots of fatherless young men that usually turn to crime. I’m not sure, but I imagine that at one time the hispanics’ Catholicism used to keep the family cohesive, but for the most part I fear that has fallen by the wayside.

    If the SHTF, it will be EVERYBODY AGAINST WHITEY.

    • Replies: @UrbaneFrancoOntarian
    Depends who they manage to exterminate first.

    It's quite possible that the urban white leftists will be the first to be attacked, given their proximity to the vibrants.

    However, if the jews/white elite can keep control of the military and of the vibrants for long enough, conservative whites will get slaughtered. Liberals will be slaughtered after that.

    Either way it's bad but it really depends on what happens.
  222. @Jake
    Your defense of Mexicans and general avoidance of Jews, as well as your agnosticism, are PC-acceptable, in some quarters PC-demanded. But you have told far too many horrific truths about the Numinous Negroes to be tolerated across the board.

    Potently accurate on all fours, a volume in two sentences.

    Fred has, indeed, written some of the most fearlessly accurate pieces on black misconduct and the hideous PC which has not just silenced most people but has then expressing views about black behavior founded in television fiction rather than daily life real time experiences.

    PC has inflicted devastation on the black community, a losing team being encouraged to continue its bad habits instead of being coached with tough love to improvement.

    There was once a motto black fathers followed in raising their sons: “Discipline is love, but love is not discipline.” PC has voided all that.

    • Replies: @Jake
    No doubt whatsoever, white Liberals have done incalculable harm to black Americans. There is no more chance of white Liberals realizing that and repenting than there was of Bolsheviks realizing how terribly they harmed the proletariat of the Russian Empire and repenting.

    This can't be said enough: 'There was once a motto black fathers followed in raising their sons: “Discipline is love, but love is not discipline.” PC has voided all that.'
  223. Anonymous[100] • Disclaimer says:
    @anonymous

    With the rise of women in the workforce
     
    Women were always in the workforce, buddy.

    https://images.fineartamerica.com/images/artworkimages/mediumlarge/1/potato-harvest-ludwig-knaus.jpg

    Use to be, poets immortalized their civilization’s heroes by singing tales of their gallantry and sacrifice.
     
    Translation: paid propagandists got the dumbest of the dumb, the ideal cannon fodder to kill and die for someone else wealth and power.

    valor and gallantry.
     
    You live in wrong century, this trash you are peddling was obsolete 100 years ago. If only you were born earlier, you too could be a hero, you too could prove your manly valor against poison gas and machine gun fire.

    https://i.pinimg.com/originals/a0/37/66/a03766080ba5ff06b10fe9567150179a.jpg

    So sad.

    Martial provess and bravery was always highly praised because it was absolutely crucial for survival. Your ancestors knew it and that’s the only reason you’re alive and have a country to call your own.

    It’s ok to be able and ready to defend yourself. Just ask your wife’s boyfriend.

    • Agree: Dreadilk
  224. @Anatoly Karlin
    Please keep off topic posts to the current Open Thread.

    If you are new to my work, start here.

    ***

    As reiner Tor points out, this was also probably a sign from God not to engage in vlogging. Since it now seems there is no way to be famous, edgy, and uncensored on YouTube, I am probably going to deprioritize these plans going forwards. I suppose it is good that it happened now, before I invested any significant time or energy into this enterprise (apart from ordering a mini-tripod for my smartphone). As for using Russian alternatives, apart from the aforementioned problem of all the significant Russians being on YouTube as well, I am certainly not going to be talking about Dagestani IQs on Russian platforms (i.e. for the same reason that German nationalists use VK over Facebook).

    Here you go Anatoly. I don’t make things up:

    Jonathan Greenblatt, chief executive of the Anti-Defamation League, which researches anti-Semitism, said it had provided input to YouTube on the policy change.

    While this is an important step forward, this move alone is insufficient and must be followed by many more changes from YouTube and other tech companies to adequately counter the scourge of online hate and extremism,” he said in a statement.

    THEY OWN THE WORLD…..AND THEY DON’T GIVE A FUCK….IF YOU KNOW IT! BECAUSE YOU CAN’T DO ANYTHING ABOUT YOU ANTISEMITIC WHITE MAN…….

    • Replies: @Justvisiting
    The power to define "online hate and extremism" (and the police to arrest the "haters") is all the power any future dictator would need.
  225. @iffen
    That worked out really well for the kulaks.

    Whether one was a kulak or a peasant was determined by who had the gun.

    Well, the point kind of was that rural resistance to city based communist coups historically tended to end up with rural peasants being starved by the urban commies, not with the cities starving.

    • Replies: @iffen
    I agree. AFAIK the elites have always been able to "take" the "surplus" from the peasants. I really don't believe that we need the communist qualifier in there. They were just one in a long continuous line.
    , @Johann Ricke

    Well, the point kind of was that rural resistance to city based communist coups historically tended to end up with rural peasants being starved by the urban commies, not with the cities starving.
     
    Agreed. While it's certainly possible that some or even a large number of peasants had the mental horsepower to organize and fight urbanites, the reality of farm work was that peasants had very little spare time to both grow crops *and* think about things unrelated to their livelihood. Mao Zedong's father was a kulak, but Mao had to devote himself to armed revolution full-time to get the Communist movement off the ground as a fighting force, and it spent much of its time avoiding the Nationalists before the Japanese invasion of China saved the Chinese Communist Party.
  226. @anonymous

    With the rise of women in the workforce
     
    Women were always in the workforce, buddy.

    https://images.fineartamerica.com/images/artworkimages/mediumlarge/1/potato-harvest-ludwig-knaus.jpg

    Use to be, poets immortalized their civilization’s heroes by singing tales of their gallantry and sacrifice.
     
    Translation: paid propagandists got the dumbest of the dumb, the ideal cannon fodder to kill and die for someone else wealth and power.

    valor and gallantry.
     
    You live in wrong century, this trash you are peddling was obsolete 100 years ago. If only you were born earlier, you too could be a hero, you too could prove your manly valor against poison gas and machine gun fire.

    https://i.pinimg.com/originals/a0/37/66/a03766080ba5ff06b10fe9567150179a.jpg

    So sad.

    “paid propagandists got the dumbest of the dumb, the ideal cannon fodder to kill and die for someone else”

    “You live in wrong century, this trash you are peddling was obsolete 100 years ago.”

    As I said, “Bravery is no longer considered worthy. Instead, women teachers–and internet censors–promote a sedated, docile keypuncher as the ideal male.”

    You have proven my very point. Thank you.

  227. Well there will come more bannings and deplatforming for political reasons, but I think that guy with the hunter videos is confused…

    I am not sure if they totally banned him but just covered up the sections where he actually killed and gutted the animals.

    I noticed that one of the U-tube sites I go to now does this during surgery. Vet-Ranch rescues dogs, cats or horses and then the Vet there either sets their bones or does surgery on them and the viewers contribute for the rehab and rehoming of the animal during recovery until they get a permanent home for the animal….Lately I noticed there is a big bubble over the animal during surgery and a little link comes up saying if you want to view the actual operation you can click on the link…the Vet mentioned otherwise they will ban the segment.

    U-tube started this to ban fights and ‘punishment’ video of children since people were complaining about these. Unfortunately there is a significant section of the public that will put anything up on U-tube to get attention, no matter how inappropriate…

  228. Last point: I think they should begin banning certain rescue videos as well, especially the ones from Asia as I think they could be deliberately hurting the animals or starving them. Then they video the ‘rescue’ to get contributions…

    I am always getting emails about horse rescue groups on U-tube that were getting contributions for rescues and then shooting the horses or selling them back to slaughter houses…

    Just sayin…

  229. Ted Kaczynski wrote an interesting article on how the System can exploit social justice causes to give people the illusion of rebellion, and by “rebelling”, leftist activists inadvertently strengthen the System.

    https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/ted-kaczynski-the-system-s-neatest-trick

    So, in a nutshell, the System’s neatest trick is this:

    1. For the sake of its own efficiency and security, the System needs to bring about deep and radical social changes to match the changed conditions resulting from technological progress.

    2. The frustration of life under the circumstances imposed by the System leads to rebellious impulses.

    3. Rebellious impulses are co-opted by the System in the service of the social changes it requires; activists “rebel” against the old and outmoded values that are no longer of use to the System and in favor of the new values that the System needs us to accept.

    4. In this way rebellious impulses, which otherwise might have been dangerous to the System, are given an outlet that is not only harmless to the System, but useful to it.

    5. Much of the public resentment resulting from the imposition of social changes is drawn away from the System and its institutions and is directed instead at the radicals who spearhead the social changes.

  230. I’m cancelling my internet provider.

    Why pay $50/month if all the best content is systematically repressed?

  231. Jun 7, 2019 Left Wing Media Activist Email Leak Shows How They Deplatform Political Rivals

    I recently received an email leak that I believe shows how activists working as journalists target their political rivals for deplatforming.

  232. @ThreeCranes
    Not too many years ago, used guns were sold in The Fivecenter, Little Nickel ad papers, classified ads in the local newspapers, yard sales and on local noon radio programs. Then we had few if any mass murders. Today gun sales are tightly regulated and mass murders are a monthly occurrence. What has changed?

    Obviously, there is not only a simple positive correlation between the availability of guns and murder and mayhem. Some other, broader factor is at work. (It's just like climate change. While it may be true that warming periods in the past were correlated with elevated atmospheric CO2, it does not follow that elevated CO2 causes warming. There may be a larger cause that drives both. Or, as we used to say, the appearance of robins doesn't make it rain in April or flowers bloom.)

    Anyway, it seems as though as women exert more control over the mores of our society, the worse men react. It's as though these rouge boys and men are lashing out against the feminization imposed upon them and society. It's like a boy who grows up in a house in which there is no Father presence. Biologically, psychologically, he misses the strength, weight and restraint that a man brings to bear upon things. Where a woman flutters her wings in helplessness, a man grabs a corner and heaves. It's no accident that criminality is worst among black boys who are the product of single mother families.

    We men are being denied our space and our virtues, which are boldness and active response. Every place we gather is now invaded by girls and women who aren't content until they have turned our treehouse into a doll house. In some psychological way, this is the cause of the school shootings.

    100% agree with this. Millennia of human evolution aren’t wrong.

  233. @Jaakko Raipala
    Well, the point kind of was that rural resistance to city based communist coups historically tended to end up with rural peasants being starved by the urban commies, not with the cities starving.

    I agree. AFAIK the elites have always been able to “take” the “surplus” from the peasants. I really don’t believe that we need the communist qualifier in there. They were just one in a long continuous line.

  234. @peterAUS
    Just stop........

    I'll assume, for a second, that you aren't trolling, so here it is, very simple: the "Five Eyes" monitor everything on the (open) Internet. Everything.........

    Here is a personal piece of advice: do not send anything out of your LAN (business, home network, public library...whatever) paired with you name/pic. Not that, if "they" want to get you, will make any difference.

    I know that several characters just got that itch to start talking technology. Don't.

    Yes...you can protect data leaving your LAN,true...and then you can really trigger "them" to start paying attention. I just don't think you'd want that.

    Ah, yes, and if somebody still wants to get "technical", fine. Let's start with Intel assembly, at bit level, peripheral chip(s). And not even that is the lowest "layer" where "they" can hack into your systems. Analog/digital conversion thing, for example.

    There is more.
    If they want, they can put, into your, mine, LAN storage, enough of "something" which could lend you/me in prison.

    They don't do it because it's counterproductive. The sheep....I mean "normies" can get agitated.

    So, they do monitor. Some people can protect their data using a mix of technology and processes/procedures. Will just make the problem worse. They don't really clamp because it's, at this stage, much better to simply monitor.

    I know that my segment of the "Five" knows my name and place of residence. If they want they can pick me up....like ...now. Squashing little me is nothing; agitating the "normies", well, not at this stage.

    Anyway....

    Our blog host (Anatoly Karlin) lives in Moscow.

    A problem for him is that in Russia, there is very strict federal law about not saying anything racist in your articles or videos. And people can be prosecuted and go to prison for producing material that is categorized as “extremist material”.

    However, when you look at the material they actually seem to categorize – it’s from VK and YouTube, but not from Facebook/Twitter/Instagram.

    So, currently it is they don’t seem to be looking onto Facebook/Twitter/Instagram, but they are looking a lot at YouTube/VK.

    He thought that it would be maybe safer on YouTube. I was just warning to be careful a bit in YouTube.

    • Replies: @peterAUS

    Our blog host (Anatoly Karlin) lives in Moscow....
    ....they don’t seem to be looking onto Facebook/Twitter/Instagram, but they are looking a lot at YouTube/VK.
     
    They ARE looking, just not acting.

    WE are looking..hahaha...very hard apparently, at MSM, ADL and similar. We are NOT acting.

    Makes sense?

    The local setup of Five Eyes are looking at my Internet presence. The State is not acting on that.
    Yet.
  235. @Anatoly Karlin
    I am not interested in doing English language video (except appearing on the occasional podcast... which I do anyway).

    Reason I want to do Russian language video, as I did explain IIRC, is that I write things about 5x faster in English than I do in Russian. So writing essays in Russian (https://akarlin.ru/) is highly inefficient - and frankly, I don't want to split efforts between UR and other projects. My longread on Russian IQ (https://sputnikipogrom.com/science/79791/russian-iq/) took me almost a week, whereas I could have banged it out in a day (if I worked hard) for UR. However, I can talk as fast and as fluently in Russian as in English, so in relative terms video is a much more attractive medium for me in Russian.

    However, the prospect of doing battle not just with Center E and Ukrainian brigades but the video hosting platform itself has rather cooled me on that idea...

    Just as my unimportant opinion as a blog consumer, I would say it would be still cool to have a YouTube channel, for occasional embeds.

    You could just use it to add video reports when you go to China, for example, and embed some to this travel videos to already very popular text blog.

    I can recommend (or send) video editing software like Magix.I don’t think actual video editing is difficult for that kind of video though. With travel blogs, probably just a steady holding of camera and narration.

    (If you wanted to make infographic videos, I guess it would probably be more time wasting and hard work though – although I wonder if it’s becoming easier with later software.)

  236. anon[605] • Disclaimer says:
    @Brabantian
    Literally, 'censorship kills' - Poster that has been hung up recalling Ms Nasim Aghdam, who went into the YouTube offices in San Bruno, California, on 3 April 2018, and opened fire with her 9mm Smith & Wesson pistol, wounding four before allegedly killing herself

    Nasim Aghdam was age 39, born in 1979 to an Iranian family, and identified as a member of the syncretic Shia-offshoot Baha'i religion ... Getting de-monetised & censored on YouTube pushed her over the edge

    YouTube ... You Next, says the poster, images of it popular as memes on 4chan etc
    https://i.ibb.co/HPjKk0Q/Nasim-Aghdam-You-Next-You-Tube-shooter.jpg

    Literally, ‘censorship kills’ – Poster that has been hung up

    Hello Mr. Smith. Thanks for your service in defense of freedom, democracy and apple pie. We all appreciate it, really appreciate.

    Ms Nasim Aghdam

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YouTube_headquarters_shooting

    This incident was quickly forgotten, because leftist, vegan, animal rights defender woman of color doing gun violence does not serve the narrative (for now).
    If “Brabantian” gets his wish, and some alt-right MAGA hat wearing fascist shoots up some low paid YT employees, the TPTB dream will come true, and mother of all crackdown on all racists and 1fascists will come.

    Read about “propaganda of the deed”. Anarchists 100 years ago were killing presidents and kings, and achieved shit. What can result from some retards shooting low paid workers and random bystanders?

    Individual terrorism is stupid.
    Do not be stupid.

    https://www.marxists.org/archive/trotsky/1911/11/tia09.htm

    • Replies: @reiner Tor

    Anarchists 100 years ago were killing presidents and kings, and achieved shit. What can result from some retards shooting low paid workers and random bystanders?

    Individual terrorism is stupid.
    Do not be stupid.
     
    This.
  237. @Nehlen
    It’s me and thanks for being honest about your concerns.

    I’d ask you to read this synopsis written back at the time everything happened and makes it clear why I did what I did: https://christophercantwell.com/2018/04/08/doxing-and-anonymity/

    Embedded in that article is the contract RV floated to me at precisely this link https://christophercantwell.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Smartcheckr-Paul-Nehlen-Oct-19.pdf

    When you add everything up, it was clear the RV was a bad actor and his dox ultimately protected other candidates who might have fallen victim to this SmartCheckr scam.

    My policy positions haven’t changed since I ran in 2016: protect American workers and secure the border. I’ve been attacked on both fronts by (((neo-cons))) and (((liberals))) alike, not to mention the undermining done by “my own people” as you labeled them in your response.

    Ultimately, my battle to ensure that social media is treated as the new public square, where lawful speech ought to be protected hasn’t wavered. I’ve spent a small fortune filing an FEC complaint over my treatment by Twitter, where nothing I wrote was unlawful or untruthful.

    Thinking that taking away the dissident right’s voice on social media will lead somewhere other than violence (in Minecraft) is folly. You don’t tell people they have to pay taxes to support ZOG and then also tell them they have no avenue to voice their displeasure with the use of those taxes.

    Ultimately, my battle to ensure that social media is treated as the new public square, where lawful speech ought to be protected hasn’t wavered. I’ve spent a small fortune filing an FEC complaint over my treatment by Twitter, where nothing I wrote was unlawful or untruthful.

    1) you shouldn’t have to spend a small fortune filing a FEC complaint 2) you’re dealing with a public square which is in corrupted by private ownership. The problem is solved by putting the public square in public ownership.

    Thinking that taking away the dissident right’s voice on social media will lead somewhere other than violence (in Minecraft) is folly. You don’t tell people they have to pay taxes to support ZOG and then also tell them they have no avenue to voice their displeasure with the use of those taxes.

    The basic problem is the Jewish attempt to privatize America – the media – politics (lobbies) – special interests etc. Their principle is that if they hold the key positions, and pay the most, then they’re in charge
    They need to find out that democracy isn’t a commercial transaction and that they’re restricted to their 2% representation in the population and that’s it.

    • Replies: @Nehlen
    Largely agree with your sentiments, and to them I would add:

    The government has outsourced censorship to private organizations while protecting the actions of those private organizations.

    Those same private corporations are shielded from prosecution by any content posted by users, thus, are at no risk when compelled to allow lawful speech.

    https://nationalvanguard.org/2018/01/paul-nehlens-proposed-shall-not-censor-legislation/
  238. @Dmitry
    Our blog host (Anatoly Karlin) lives in Moscow.

    A problem for him is that in Russia, there is very strict federal law about not saying anything racist in your articles or videos. And people can be prosecuted and go to prison for producing material that is categorized as "extremist material".

    However, when you look at the material they actually seem to categorize - it's from VK and YouTube, but not from Facebook/Twitter/Instagram.

    So, currently it is they don't seem to be looking onto Facebook/Twitter/Instagram, but they are looking a lot at YouTube/VK.

    He thought that it would be maybe safer on YouTube. I was just warning to be careful a bit in YouTube.

    Our blog host (Anatoly Karlin) lives in Moscow….
    ….they don’t seem to be looking onto Facebook/Twitter/Instagram, but they are looking a lot at YouTube/VK.

    They ARE looking, just not acting.

    WE are looking..hahaha…very hard apparently, at MSM, ADL and similar. We are NOT acting.

    Makes sense?

    The local setup of Five Eyes are looking at my Internet presence. The State is not acting on that.
    Yet.

    • Replies: @Anon
    It's as simple as: nothing connected to the Internet can, ever, be out-of-reach for external parties.
    , @ThreeCranes
    That's the point of sites like this one; to flush us out and expose us (or allow us to expose ourselves) as the clamoring idiots we are.
    , @Dmitry
    I was talking about a different topic.

    However, since we started talking, this comment section has attracted so many crazy weirdos and extremists who sound like terrorists (and some even started posting videos of terrorists), in the end - you unintentionally had a good point.

    Now you're logged together with all these crazy people.

  239. Didn’t Tumblr already try this?

    Seriously, it sucks to be one of the people presently losing a revenue stream, but I see this as more of a fatal blow to YouTube, than a fatal blow to the Alt-Right (or whatever you want to call it).

    • Replies: @dfordoom

    but I see this as more of a fatal blow to YouTube
     
    Yes, I'm sure they're incredibly worried about the prospect of losing about 0.01% of their user base.

    You're living in a dream world.
  240. @ThreeCranes
    Alright, boys and girls. Go to your kitchen tap and turn on the water. Now, hold a spoon by the tip of the handle lightly between thumb and forefinger of one hand. With it's back i.e. the convex side, to the down-rushing stream of water, bring the extreme outside face of the cup of the spoon close to the stream until it just barely touches the edge of the flowing column. What happens?

    That's what draws the two ships together. Remember Bernoulli?

    Yes…that’s very highly likely the physics involved….Bernoulli Principle…….but not really my main point……But your point raises the question why physicists use the maritime analogy of the Casimir Effect as if something like it…a macroscopic version of it as if there were a macroscopic version of it….The Casimir Effect…I think….Force range r^-4…..

    Main point:in light of the most recent US Navy at-sea-accident that killed over a dozen crew members…….God help us if the next close encounter by a Russian Frigate and USS Navy Frigate…especially if the US Navy Frigate has as its captain a Democratic Party Voter of this type:Annapolis Grad…Black Sheboon fond of giving Black Power Salutes with other Annapolis Sheboon Cadets:”Hail Obama”…..like the Sheboon Cadets at West Point are fond of doing in photographs that can be found on Google Images……So this is how it all ends……

    THE US CIVIL WAR WASN’T WORTH IT……800 thousand dead NATIVE BORN WHITE AMERICAN MEN…for what? Sheboon Power?

    • Replies: @War for Blair Mountain
    ThreeCranes...

    Not to sidetrack Anatoly’s discussion framework

    Your streamline framework for understanding the attractive forces between ships...no doubt the most physically sensible....but I wouldn’t rule out a symmetry breaking physics interacting with the equilibrium of the hydrodynamics.......I just thought I give you something to think about for your personal amusement........OK...back to the show......

  241. @ThreeCranes
    Of course, the CNN announcer woman in her monologue while the clip is being shown says (not exact) "Look how that Russian ship is veering towards our ship!". Now this is sheer nationalist jingoism. In the real world, the stream of water acts fairly equally upon both. It cares not a whit that one is painted red and the other blue.

    I’ll make it simpler for you: The filthy fucking White Whore CNN ANNOUNCER:”Look…the Russian ship is interfering with America’s DIVINE EDICT!!! to impose HOMO PEDERASTY UPON CHRISTIAN RUSSIA…AND SHIA MUSLIM IRAN!!!

    • LOL: ThreeCranes
  242. @Robert Dolan
    Well....you are partly right.

    I worked with non-whites for many years. Yes, the mexicans ran the blacks out of South Central, and for the most part they hate each other.

    HOWEVER......both groups are absolutely unified in their hatred of white people.

    Asians don't like blacks either, but Asians hate whites more than they hate blacks, so they vote left too.

    The rainbow coalition is held together by hatred of whites, and they are taught to hate whites by the jews at the top.

    Essentially, jews weaponized ALL of the non-whites (and gays) against white Christian people.

    hispanic youth imitate black youth culture. hispanic youths listen to rap, wear "saggin" pants, caps backwards, tats, etc.

    The hispanics say, "Can't be white so we gotta act black."

    Yes, it's extraordinarily weird. The first time I saw young latinos acting black I was really stunned and confused. After a few years I just got used to the silliness.

    hispanics have also fallen into the black's R reproductive strategies, with their males having sex with as many women as they can, baby mommas everywhere, and lots of fatherless young men that usually turn to crime. I'm not sure, but I imagine that at one time the hispanics' Catholicism used to keep the family cohesive, but for the most part I fear that has fallen by the wayside.

    If the SHTF, it will be EVERYBODY AGAINST WHITEY.

    Depends who they manage to exterminate first.

    It’s quite possible that the urban white leftists will be the first to be attacked, given their proximity to the vibrants.

    However, if the jews/white elite can keep control of the military and of the vibrants for long enough, conservative whites will get slaughtered. Liberals will be slaughtered after that.

    Either way it’s bad but it really depends on what happens.

  243. lloyd says: • Website

    The Russian Soviet model is usually held as a model of the thought control State. The Russian people don’t recognise it unless they live in the West. The best model of contemporary thought control State is England in the Napoleonic wars and their post war era. That after all was also an Anglo police State. Anglo political censorship is arbitrary and full of inconsistencies. Its arbiters don’t actually like what they are doing. As bad disciplinarians, they neglect subversion and then panic and over react. They are not ideologists and just want a comfortable wealthy puritan life. That is not offending or upsetting power groups. The Church, Royalty and the gentry then. Zionists, feminists and minorities now. The open thinking of alt right and left, they actually esteem but futiley want it confined to technological progress. The ruling classes in the West are quite stupid and are easily tripped up. After the destruction of the artisan classes in England after 1848, England settled down to its class war between the haves and the have nots. Its official history then made that seem the natural order of things. I suspect that is what the globalists want now after the shocking events to them since Brexit and November 8 2016. The poet Blake got charged with sedition after he said a few honest things about the English King to a soldier who had urinated against his garden wall. After a trial with all legal jury procedures, he was found not guilty. He was more cautious after that but his coded language kept him safe. His greatest poetry was written after the garden wall event. Karlin raises this after his 1984 pessimism. Having been deplatformed myself, I see a hopeful more reflective time after the wild West of the Internet.

  244. @Brabantian
    Part of Anatoly Karlin's article above, is evidence for the theory that the big porn sites must be run by the governments ... as the big porn sites are in fact bigger than YouTube. AK writes:

    YouTube operates on an annual loss of a billion dollars. It is something that Alphabet subsidizes for presumably political reasons. No other site can afford to be a YouTube. Videos take up a lot of storage space, and HDD’s don’t come free!
     
    A couple years back ZeroHedge was doing articles on the porn 'business' citing IT zines like TechCruch with stats saying that, e.g., the biggest porn site in the world at that time, XVideos, was at moments taking up 2% of the ENTIRE INTERNET BANDWIDTH OF THE WORLD, ha!

    Apparently the porn sites all have lots of advertising and links to pay-porn sites ... but it's hard to explain how they really supply enough income, given how every teenage kid in the world knows how to get thousands of hours of porn vids for free.

    It's also notable that the copyright-censorship policing of porn, is very relaxed, versus the much more aggressive policing of recent Hollywood movie releases ... It's almost as if the porn content owners - apparently the USA porn is heavily Jewish in ownership - have a memo to 'go easy' on the pirating of their vids on PornHub etc

    Interestingly the Jewish groups like ADL so aggressive against 'hate speech' and at the heart of these censorship campaigns, are quite supportive of Jewish porn owners, actresses etc., and don't hesitate to honour them as Jewish leaders in media, so you see Abe Foxman grinning with his Jewish porn friends etc

    Porn is good for destroying will power in men. The many no fap sites on the net talk about this. This is why Jewish power promotes porn. Israelis know this. When they invaded Palestinians towns in 2002, they hacked all the television stations and put on porn.

    http://cosmos.ucc.ie/cs1064/jabowen/IPSC/php/event.php?eid=3562

    “Israeli soldiers broadcast pornography on 3 occupied Palestinian TV stations, the Al-Watan, Ammwaj, and Al-Sharaq channels. A fourth local station, whose premises were not seized by the army, ran a written message across its screen letting people know it was the Israelis who were behind the graphic scenes. “Anything currently shown on Al-Watan and other local TV channels has nothing to do with Palestinian programs but is being broadcast by the Israeli occupation forces, we urge parents to take precautions,” the message said.

    The British use the word wanker to describe foolish,weak persons. British low culture figured this out too.

  245. @Brabantian
    Part of Anatoly Karlin's article above, is evidence for the theory that the big porn sites must be run by the governments ... as the big porn sites are in fact bigger than YouTube. AK writes:

    YouTube operates on an annual loss of a billion dollars. It is something that Alphabet subsidizes for presumably political reasons. No other site can afford to be a YouTube. Videos take up a lot of storage space, and HDD’s don’t come free!
     
    A couple years back ZeroHedge was doing articles on the porn 'business' citing IT zines like TechCruch with stats saying that, e.g., the biggest porn site in the world at that time, XVideos, was at moments taking up 2% of the ENTIRE INTERNET BANDWIDTH OF THE WORLD, ha!

    Apparently the porn sites all have lots of advertising and links to pay-porn sites ... but it's hard to explain how they really supply enough income, given how every teenage kid in the world knows how to get thousands of hours of porn vids for free.

    It's also notable that the copyright-censorship policing of porn, is very relaxed, versus the much more aggressive policing of recent Hollywood movie releases ... It's almost as if the porn content owners - apparently the USA porn is heavily Jewish in ownership - have a memo to 'go easy' on the pirating of their vids on PornHub etc

    Interestingly the Jewish groups like ADL so aggressive against 'hate speech' and at the heart of these censorship campaigns, are quite supportive of Jewish porn owners, actresses etc., and don't hesitate to honour them as Jewish leaders in media, so you see Abe Foxman grinning with his Jewish porn friends etc

    Porn is good for destroying will power in men. The many no fap sites on the net talk about this. This is why Jewish power promotes porn. Israelis know this. When they invaded Palestinians towns in 2002, they hacked all the television stations and put on porn.

    http://cosmos.ucc.ie/cs1064/jabowen/IPSC/php/event.php?eid=3562

    “Israeli soldiers broadcast pornography on 3 occupied Palestinian TV stations, the Al-Watan, Ammwaj, and Al-Sharaq channels. A fourth local station, whose premises were not seized by the army, ran a written message across its screen letting people know it was the Israelis who were behind the graphic scenes. “Anything currently shown on Al-Watan and other local TV channels has nothing to do with Palestinian programs but is being broadcast by the Israeli occupation forces, we urge parents to take precautions,” the message said.

    The British use the word wanker to describe foolish,weak persons. British low culture figured this out too.

  246. @Brabantian
    Part of Anatoly Karlin's article above, is evidence for the theory that the big porn sites must be run by the governments ... as the big porn sites are in fact bigger than YouTube. AK writes:

    YouTube operates on an annual loss of a billion dollars. It is something that Alphabet subsidizes for presumably political reasons. No other site can afford to be a YouTube. Videos take up a lot of storage space, and HDD’s don’t come free!
     
    A couple years back ZeroHedge was doing articles on the porn 'business' citing IT zines like TechCruch with stats saying that, e.g., the biggest porn site in the world at that time, XVideos, was at moments taking up 2% of the ENTIRE INTERNET BANDWIDTH OF THE WORLD, ha!

    Apparently the porn sites all have lots of advertising and links to pay-porn sites ... but it's hard to explain how they really supply enough income, given how every teenage kid in the world knows how to get thousands of hours of porn vids for free.

    It's also notable that the copyright-censorship policing of porn, is very relaxed, versus the much more aggressive policing of recent Hollywood movie releases ... It's almost as if the porn content owners - apparently the USA porn is heavily Jewish in ownership - have a memo to 'go easy' on the pirating of their vids on PornHub etc

    Interestingly the Jewish groups like ADL so aggressive against 'hate speech' and at the heart of these censorship campaigns, are quite supportive of Jewish porn owners, actresses etc., and don't hesitate to honour them as Jewish leaders in media, so you see Abe Foxman grinning with his Jewish porn friends etc

    Porn is good for destroying will power in men. The many no fap sites on the net talk about this. This is why Jewish power promotes porn. Israelis know this. When they invaded Palestinians towns in 2002, they hacked all the television stations and put on porn.

    “Israeli soldiers broadcast pornography on 3 occupied Palestinian TV stations, the Al-Watan, Ammwaj, and Al-Sharaq channels. A fourth local station, whose premises were not seized by the army, ran a written message across its screen letting people know it was the Israelis who were behind the graphic scenes. “Anything currently shown on Al-Watan and other local TV channels has nothing to do with Palestinian programs but is being broadcast by the Israeli occupation forces, we urge parents to take precautions,” the message said.

    The British use the word wanker to describe foolish,weak persons. British low culture figured this out too.

  247. @War for Blair Mountain
    Yes...that’s very highly likely the physics involved....Bernoulli Principle.......but not really my main point......But your point raises the question why physicists use the maritime analogy of the Casimir Effect as if something like it...a macroscopic version of it as if there were a macroscopic version of it....The Casimir Effect...I think....Force range r^-4.....

    Main point:in light of the most recent US Navy at-sea-accident that killed over a dozen crew members.......God help us if the next close encounter by a Russian Frigate and USS Navy Frigate...especially if the US Navy Frigate has as its captain a Democratic Party Voter of this type:Annapolis Grad...Black Sheboon fond of giving Black Power Salutes with other Annapolis Sheboon Cadets:”Hail Obama”.....like the Sheboon Cadets at West Point are fond of doing in photographs that can be found on Google Images......So this is how it all ends......

    THE US CIVIL WAR WASN’T WORTH IT......800 thousand dead NATIVE BORN WHITE AMERICAN MEN...for what? Sheboon Power?

    ThreeCranes…

    Not to sidetrack Anatoly’s discussion framework

    Your streamline framework for understanding the attractive forces between ships…no doubt the most physically sensible….but I wouldn’t rule out a symmetry breaking physics interacting with the equilibrium of the hydrodynamics…….I just thought I give you something to think about for your personal amusement……..OK…back to the show……

  248. It’s important to understand who is pushing hardest for censorship, and why.

    https://twitter.com/cursedsalad/status/1137136187456442369

    • Replies: @ThreeCranes
    49 "hate" deaths over a period of 16 years? Jeez, that works out to three a year. And those were the doings of a population of roughly 200,000,000 whites?

    Humans aren't angels. What can one say about this level of insanity? Except that it's not insane at all. It's part of a clever plan crafted by amoral sociopaths.
  249. Anyone who appreciates this blog post might enjoy reading C. J. Hopkins’s Zone 23, whose story is germane to it.

  250. @Miro23

    Ultimately, my battle to ensure that social media is treated as the new public square, where lawful speech ought to be protected hasn’t wavered. I’ve spent a small fortune filing an FEC complaint over my treatment by Twitter, where nothing I wrote was unlawful or untruthful.

     

    1) you shouldn't have to spend a small fortune filing a FEC complaint 2) you're dealing with a public square which is in corrupted by private ownership. The problem is solved by putting the public square in public ownership.

    Thinking that taking away the dissident right’s voice on social media will lead somewhere other than violence (in Minecraft) is folly. You don’t tell people they have to pay taxes to support ZOG and then also tell them they have no avenue to voice their displeasure with the use of those taxes.
     
    The basic problem is the Jewish attempt to privatize America - the media - politics (lobbies) - special interests etc. Their principle is that if they hold the key positions, and pay the most, then they're in charge
    They need to find out that democracy isn't a commercial transaction and that they're restricted to their 2% representation in the population and that's it.

    Largely agree with your sentiments, and to them I would add:

    The government has outsourced censorship to private organizations while protecting the actions of those private organizations.

    Those same private corporations are shielded from prosecution by any content posted by users, thus, are at no risk when compelled to allow lawful speech.

    https://nationalvanguard.org/2018/01/paul-nehlens-proposed-shall-not-censor-legislation/

    • Replies: @Monotonous Languor
    You're still mired in the old paradigm (the objective legal framework, the one that used to work).

    New laws are real spiffy, but they won't do a damned bit of good if nobody will enforce them, and the leftist State Religion says "it's not our values” to even try.

    I guess I'll repeat myself, fat lot of good it will do:
    If you accept the enemy's premises, then you will fight the wrong battles, and you will ultimately lose.

  251. @jeff stryker
    Look at the Amazon Indians in the Brazilian rain forests. When Hispanic governments/businesses want to log or mine, they simply order the military to shoot the Amazonian Indians.

    When America becomes Brazil pt 2, same thing for rural white resistors.

    The reality is that Red States have no power. As far as Jews on Wall Street, Hispanics in their barrios and machete-worshiping drug cartels, blacks in the hood and felch-breath gays are concerned Red State whites are only good for handing over things like toilet paper from forestry or breakfast cereal.

    None of them give a fat rat's ass how Red State rural whites feel.

    Jeff,

    You’re talking out of the wrong orifice again. A few questions should provide you with some food for thought. How many Amazonian Indians are serving in the Brazilian military? What percentage of the troops? How many Red State whites are serving in the US military? What percentage of the troops? Would white troops from Red States shoot their families, friends and the people from their ?communities? Or would they turn their guns on their officers? How many guns are in the hands of the Amazonian Indians? How many guns are in the hands of white people in Red States? Are they proficient in the use of those guns? Are they able to organize among their communities when they are faced with a real threat?

    They should give a fat rat’s ass about how Red State rural whites feel, because the fine thread that still binds America as a viable nation is those Red State rural whites, as Obama said “clinging to their guns and their religion”. They are actually at this point the only hope for America. God bless them.

    Frankie P

    • Replies: @UrbaneFrancoOntarian
    Yes, they are the Americans, the glue. The southern Dixies, the northern Yankees, the western men are all Americans, despite some conflicts and differences. Every year the glue is stretched a little thinner.

    But honestly. What good are they doing by saving their "country"? It has to come crashing down. This has been my realization. I used to be patriotic about Canada until I realized - this nation hates me. I fight for my race, my skin colour and values are my nation. I work to make the white community strong, not to make the nation strong now.

    Fuck canada. Fuck america. Maybe one day they will be great again, but ...
  252. @neutral

    He serves The Nose now
     
    He was always loyal to the jew. I am still perplexed by people like Andrew Anglin that for some time thought that Trump was pro white. He let his own daughter marry a jew and let Kushner run the White House.

    His affinity to Jews was something many people were willing to accept as a major but non-fatal flaw, and that he at the end of the day wasn’t going to be truly pro-white. He could have reversed much of the rot and set things on the right course, even if he was highly favorable to Jews. And after all, he had Stephen Miller in his cabinet, who was seemingly quite atypical for Jews.

    He’s turned out to be as big of a boomer shabbos goy zionist retard as you can get. Oh well.

  253. @Nehlen
    Largely agree with your sentiments, and to them I would add:

    The government has outsourced censorship to private organizations while protecting the actions of those private organizations.

    Those same private corporations are shielded from prosecution by any content posted by users, thus, are at no risk when compelled to allow lawful speech.

    https://nationalvanguard.org/2018/01/paul-nehlens-proposed-shall-not-censor-legislation/

    You’re still mired in the old paradigm (the objective legal framework, the one that used to work).

    New laws are real spiffy, but they won’t do a damned bit of good if nobody will enforce them, and the leftist State Religion says “it’s not our values” to even try.

    I guess I’ll repeat myself, fat lot of good it will do:
    If you accept the enemy’s premises, then you will fight the wrong battles, and you will ultimately lose.

    • Replies: @Nehlen
    I’ve moved past the old paradigm.

    We have virtually nowhere to speak the truth without triggering a ban of some sort.

    Pretty sure we all know what options that leaves us.

  254. @peterAUS

    YouTube is one of the websites the authorities monitor.....
     
    Yep.

    They don’t (or didn’t until now) monitor Facebook, Twitter or Instagram though.
     
    Hahahahahahahahaaaha.......

    My God, man, you almost gave me hernia.

    I've seen some articles/comments on this site, but this, well......

    Wow...

    The “some articles” outmatching the “some comments”, by the way.

  255. @Biff

    Second, YouTube operates on an annual loss of a billion dollars. It is something that Alphabet subsidizes for presumably political reasons.
     
    Who’s Alphabet?

    Alphabet Inc. is Google’s parent company

  256. @frankie p
    Jeff,

    You're talking out of the wrong orifice again. A few questions should provide you with some food for thought. How many Amazonian Indians are serving in the Brazilian military? What percentage of the troops? How many Red State whites are serving in the US military? What percentage of the troops? Would white troops from Red States shoot their families, friends and the people from their ?communities? Or would they turn their guns on their officers? How many guns are in the hands of the Amazonian Indians? How many guns are in the hands of white people in Red States? Are they proficient in the use of those guns? Are they able to organize among their communities when they are faced with a real threat?

    They should give a fat rat's ass about how Red State rural whites feel, because the fine thread that still binds America as a viable nation is those Red State rural whites, as Obama said "clinging to their guns and their religion". They are actually at this point the only hope for America. God bless them.

    Frankie P

    Yes, they are the Americans, the glue. The southern Dixies, the northern Yankees, the western men are all Americans, despite some conflicts and differences. Every year the glue is stretched a little thinner.

    But honestly. What good are they doing by saving their “country”? It has to come crashing down. This has been my realization. I used to be patriotic about Canada until I realized – this nation hates me. I fight for my race, my skin colour and values are my nation. I work to make the white community strong, not to make the nation strong now.

    Fuck canada. Fuck america. Maybe one day they will be great again, but …

    • Replies: @Anonnuu
    You're just a christcuck.
  257. @peterAUS

    Our blog host (Anatoly Karlin) lives in Moscow....
    ....they don’t seem to be looking onto Facebook/Twitter/Instagram, but they are looking a lot at YouTube/VK.
     
    They ARE looking, just not acting.

    WE are looking..hahaha...very hard apparently, at MSM, ADL and similar. We are NOT acting.

    Makes sense?

    The local setup of Five Eyes are looking at my Internet presence. The State is not acting on that.
    Yet.

    It’s as simple as: nothing connected to the Internet can, ever, be out-of-reach for external parties.

  258. I don’t agree with any censorship, but I think they’re just using this gay dude as an excuse, they’ve been at this for a long time now. I disagree with pretty much everything the “alt right” has too say, most of it is nonsense. The “alt-right” is nothing but CIA and Mossad propaganda, serving the interests of the capitalist ruling class and the war machine. Keeping the slaves divided and fighting amongst themselves, keeping the slaves on their capitalist overlords plantation.

    Same thing they do in foreign nations to control people. Divide and rule. Scaring the mindless sheep with the century old Red Scare. Making them wet their beds having nightmares of radical Islamic terrorists that don’t exist. Terrifying them with stories of Mexican boogiemens “invading” from the South. Driving the sheep to suicide telling them theres a Jewish white genocide in progress while Wall St capitalist policies are actually killing them and replacing them, just as they always have, to maximize profits. Never telling you the true cause of all of the troubles, never telling you why those people are fleeing their homelands. Why is that? Easier to just scream about Jews! Socialists! Communists! Terrorists! Radical leftists!

    It would be funny if it wasn’t so sad, and stupid.

    Yeah ADL sucks, lots of Jews suck, some of the biggest hypocrites ever, but there are lots of Jews who do the right thing, Glenn Greenwald for example, all the screaming about Jews and not addressing the system as a whole is just pissing in the wind. You’re being played. You are the CIA’s useful idiots. There are plenty of legitimate things to criticize Zionists, Jews, Israelis for, no need to blame them for the skidmarks in your bloomers, or try to write off Americas/Wall St’s role in all the evil bullshit.

    You want people to take you seriously? Stop peddling lies perhaps? But that is what the CIA does best so I I doubt that will ever happen.

    http://bostonreview.net/politics/emmaia-gelman-anti-defamation-league-not-what-it-seems

    Hassan Nasrallah: Israel is only a US tool

    Hassan Nasrallah: US ruled by huge Oil & Weapons Corporations

    Nasrallah on ‘real reason’ why US continues 40 years of war on Iran

    Hassan Nasrallah on the Oil and Gas Wars Raging in the Middle East (1)

    Hassan Nasrallah on the Oil and Gas Wars Raging in the Middle East (2)

    • Disagree: Robert Dolan
    • Replies: @fnn

    The “alt-right” is nothing but CIA and Mossad propaganda, serving the interests of the capitalist ruling class and the war machine.
     
    Who told you that? Was it someone who works in Hollywood"
  259. @peterAUS

    Our blog host (Anatoly Karlin) lives in Moscow....
    ....they don’t seem to be looking onto Facebook/Twitter/Instagram, but they are looking a lot at YouTube/VK.
     
    They ARE looking, just not acting.

    WE are looking..hahaha...very hard apparently, at MSM, ADL and similar. We are NOT acting.

    Makes sense?

    The local setup of Five Eyes are looking at my Internet presence. The State is not acting on that.
    Yet.

    That’s the point of sites like this one; to flush us out and expose us (or allow us to expose ourselves) as the clamoring idiots we are.

    • Replies: @peterAUS
    One of purposes.

    The main is to give "normies" perception of freedom, free speech and such.
    Next, to keep in touch with what people, who could be out of line, really think.
    Next is to have a place for those people to vent. Safety valve if you will.
    The last is, actually, to "flush" anybody out. Of course we are in some database, but that's only "just in case".

    Having said all that, well, could work for "us". Whatever that "us" means.
    Just a little.
  260. @jimmyriddle
    The Russian authorities and the YouTube censors are both prioritising popular dissident content.

    So, the Russians leave English language conent alone.

    And YT don't bother a channel like Brother Nathaniel (whose entire output consists of "What can I blame the Jews for, today?"). Instead, they go after centre-right anti-globalists like Sargon and Crowder.

    Brother Nathanael has had several videos demonetized or downright censored, and it’s not from today.

  261. @Mr McKenna

    YT don’t bother a channel like Brother Nathaniel (whose entire output consists of “What can I blame the Jews for, today?”). Instead, they go after centre-right anti-globalists like Sargon and Crowder.
     
    They'll very seldom deplatform clowns. Clowns serve a valuable purpose in de-legitimating the opposition. Look how ridiculous our critics are!

    Meanwhile, I don't watch videos so what happens (or doesn't) on YouTube doesn't matter much to me.

    And a very wise man once said: whatever the censors would cut out, should be cut out. Because if it's obvious enough to the censors, it's probably stupid as well. This is, I believe, what Mr Karlin is driving at when he says:


    it may also impose a certain discipline on content producers, forcing them to pick their words with care... most of the greatest “subversive” literature was produced in moderately repressive ancien regimes, not democratic republics with strong freedoms of speech.
     

    I kinda like Brother Nathanael, why a clown? I think someone such as Andrew Anglin plays that “clown” role better.

    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
    I like both Brother Nathaniel and Anglin.

    At one time I went to BN's site and watched nearly all of his clips and I learned a lot.
    He's not a clown and he's totally sincere, even if he looks a bit different.

    Anglin is a good writer and some of his content is great. But I really get tired of his boomer bashing and woman hating nonsense.

    The nose ruined our women, brainwashed the boomers, cucked the church. Our people are victims, not perps.

    Anglin's hate for boomers is simply stupid, but all of the alt-right seems to think it's hip and edgy to shit on older white people.
    , @lavoisier
    BN is not a clown. Very entertaining and a bit odd for sure but he makes cogent arguments.

    He also is sincere in his words and in his work.

    Nothing to ridicule.
  262. @eah
    It's important to understand who is pushing hardest for censorship, and why.

    https://twitter.com/cursedsalad/status/1137136187456442369

    49 “hate” deaths over a period of 16 years? Jeez, that works out to three a year. And those were the doings of a population of roughly 200,000,000 whites?

    Humans aren’t angels. What can one say about this level of insanity? Except that it’s not insane at all. It’s part of a clever plan crafted by amoral sociopaths.

  263. @ThreeCranes
    That's the point of sites like this one; to flush us out and expose us (or allow us to expose ourselves) as the clamoring idiots we are.

    One of purposes.

    The main is to give “normies” perception of freedom, free speech and such.
    Next, to keep in touch with what people, who could be out of line, really think.
    Next is to have a place for those people to vent. Safety valve if you will.
    The last is, actually, to “flush” anybody out. Of course we are in some database, but that’s only “just in case”.

    Having said all that, well, could work for “us”. Whatever that “us” means.
    Just a little.

  264. @Dumbo
    I kinda like Brother Nathanael, why a clown? I think someone such as Andrew Anglin plays that "clown" role better.

    I like both Brother Nathaniel and Anglin.

    At one time I went to BN’s site and watched nearly all of his clips and I learned a lot.
    He’s not a clown and he’s totally sincere, even if he looks a bit different.

    Anglin is a good writer and some of his content is great. But I really get tired of his boomer bashing and woman hating nonsense.

    The nose ruined our women, brainwashed the boomers, cucked the church. Our people are victims, not perps.

    Anglin’s hate for boomers is simply stupid, but all of the alt-right seems to think it’s hip and edgy to shit on older white people.

  265. @Kevin O'Keeffe
    Didn't Tumblr already try this?

    Seriously, it sucks to be one of the people presently losing a revenue stream, but I see this as more of a fatal blow to YouTube, than a fatal blow to the Alt-Right (or whatever you want to call it).

    but I see this as more of a fatal blow to YouTube

    Yes, I’m sure they’re incredibly worried about the prospect of losing about 0.01% of their user base.

    You’re living in a dream world.

    • Agree: reiner Tor
  266. @Monotonous Languor
    You're still mired in the old paradigm (the objective legal framework, the one that used to work).

    New laws are real spiffy, but they won't do a damned bit of good if nobody will enforce them, and the leftist State Religion says "it's not our values” to even try.

    I guess I'll repeat myself, fat lot of good it will do:
    If you accept the enemy's premises, then you will fight the wrong battles, and you will ultimately lose.

    I’ve moved past the old paradigm.

    We have virtually nowhere to speak the truth without triggering a ban of some sort.

    Pretty sure we all know what options that leaves us.

    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
    If people do not have a voice they will turn to violence.
  267. @Whitewolf

    But can’t websites just host their own videos?
     
    That's how things used to be done. Hosting rates now are a lot more affordable too. Most podcasts are still hosted by their creators.

    People have just got lazy with youtube and enticed by it's huge viewer counts. Much of that viewer count is really inaccessible anyway since youtube can promote any video it wants. The sheer number of videos out there means it's real easy to get lost in the crowd.

    Does anybody have any recommendations or thoughts on good hosts/registrars that are politically agnostic? IIRC didn’t Anglin actually have both his domain name seized and his hosting terminated? To me, that is much scarier than youtube or twitter demonetizing–what are you supposed to do about that, build your own internet?

    WRT video, it seems like it would make more sense to host your own bare bones text/images site on a cheap host, load videos to bitchute, and provide links to the videos, rather than getting a video hosting plan.

    That leaves the question of monetization. Soliciting donations is an option but there’s certainly a ceiling to that. Something like adwords is a non-starter, obviously. You could solicit for ads on the site. Much more labor intensive, but on the other hand safer from demonetization. I actually could see people in mail order businesses that are very crowded, who have no other way to distinguish themselves, advertising on sites like this. I’m being serious–one of my neighbors was in a business like this and he said that for these sorts of crowded marketplaces the ROI for keyword advertising on google was zero–they basically sucked every last penny of value out of you. So someone like him, without a lot of options, might be willing to advertise on a site like that, particularly if there is a good fit with the demographic. Alex Jones seems to be doing this with supplements but I could see it working for other things.

    Anyway its a long row to hoe but not impossible.

    • Replies: @Republic

    didn’t Anglin actually have both his domain name seized and his hosting terminated?
     
    He was unable to register is site from many providers all over the world, from Hong Kong to Albania.
    He now has a tor site, read the wiki entry for full details.
  268. It is entirely predictable and logical for major internet companies to be political and seek to be tied into the State apparatus. Why not? In this stage of capitalism to think that Youtube is a public utility is just plain nuts–they’re only in it for the money and the power as is every other corporate-capitalist enterprise and they will do ANYTHING to get what they want and make deals with other powerful lords to do it. That’s reality and I can’t blame those companies for playing along with the state security services.

    The problem is not with all those social media companies–the problem is the public itself. Most Americans are quite happy to be told what to think and what to do–they want a solid mythological framework no matter how divorced it is from reality–that’s been clearly shown over and over and over again. I isn’t the ruling elites who are at fault–we have a public, in the USA at least, which is more than willing to pull the wool over their own eyes. You don’t need to drag people out of their homes and put them in Gulag to encourage them to conform to the State Narratives provided by the mainstream. Even if most people don’t believe CNN and the NYT and so on they still need the Narrative. There is little interest among any group I know in liberty, freedom, equality, cooperation or real community as long as there is 24/7 entertainment and drugs.

    If we really cared we wouldn’t be online complaining about all this but would be coming together with those of us who agree–I’ve seen this coming since the 90s and I’ve tried to encourage this for 20+ years and no one but no one is interested in forming any kind of true cooperative structures/communities despite the fact that it is the only way that change will come. That means structures that aren’t there for a day or week or month or even one election season but for all time. This is what made the union and civil rights movements so strong–both are now either weak or have turned into the left-wing fascism of identity politics.

    • Replies: @peterAUS

    Most Americans are quite happy to be told what to think and what to do–they want a solid mythological framework no matter how divorced it is from reality–that’s been clearly shown over and over and over again. I isn’t the ruling elites who are at fault–we have a public, in the USA at least, which is more than willing to pull the wool over their own eyes. You don’t need to drag people out of their homes and put them in Gulag to encourage them to conform to the State Narratives provided by the mainstream. Even if most people don’t believe CNN and the NYT and so on they still need the Narrative.
     
    Pretty much.

    As for the second paragraph, especially

    .....it is the only way that change will come...
     
    well...O.K.
    I am sure there are some other options but this is neither place nor time to talk about it.

    In any case, it's quite possible, as things do get worse, that people would go along that idea you mentioned above.
    I guess you'll have a backup plan in place should TPTBs clamp, hard, on you.
    , @Anonymous

    The problem is not with all those social media companies–the problem is the public itself.
     
    Congratulations! That's no doubt the dumbest statement for June.

    The public was happily spreading red pills at an unprecedented pace on the Net. That's why they're gagging us, sparky. How can you be so blind?
    , @Corvinus
    "The problem is not with all those social media companies–the problem is the public itself. Most Americans are quite happy to be told what to think and what to do..."

    Not this tired argument. The fact is that most Americans think for themselves on a daily basis. They enjoy their liberty. They are not this "sheep being led to slaughter" as you like to imagine.
  269. @Nehlen
    I’ve moved past the old paradigm.

    We have virtually nowhere to speak the truth without triggering a ban of some sort.

    Pretty sure we all know what options that leaves us.

    If people do not have a voice they will turn to violence.

    • Replies: @dfordoom

    If people do not have a voice they will turn to violence.
     
    What people? Most white people are quite happy with the current situation. This massive seething resentment and anger of the silent majority that is sooner or later going to explode - it's a myth. Most white people just don't care. They're so accustomed to living empty meaningless lives ruled by consumerism and hedonism that they think it's normal. They don't know any better.

    They think modern western society is the most enlightened most civilised most virtuous society that has ever existed.

    They're not going to turn to violence. They're not going to do anything. They don't want a voice.
  270. @UrbaneFrancoOntarian
    Yes, they are the Americans, the glue. The southern Dixies, the northern Yankees, the western men are all Americans, despite some conflicts and differences. Every year the glue is stretched a little thinner.

    But honestly. What good are they doing by saving their "country"? It has to come crashing down. This has been my realization. I used to be patriotic about Canada until I realized - this nation hates me. I fight for my race, my skin colour and values are my nation. I work to make the white community strong, not to make the nation strong now.

    Fuck canada. Fuck america. Maybe one day they will be great again, but ...

    You’re just a christcuck.

  271. As an FYI, the Chinese video sites like iqiyi, youku, v.qq all play at least 30 seconds (sometimes even 90 seconds) of ads before they let you watch. The state owned ones like CCTV don’t have anywhere near as much if at all.

  272. @John Burns, Gettysburg Partisan

    Go to the supermarket to buy meat like everyone else.

     

    Wild game tastes better and makes a boy into a man.

    Wild game tastes better

    Yes.

    … and makes a boy into a man.

    Sorry, no. Only hard work and responsibility does that. Certainly not the recreational killing of wild animals.

    P.S. Seeing your comment gives me proof America is doomed.

    • Replies: @Anonymoose
    don't think game hunting is a sign of doom. It's one of the few traditional prmitive hobbies man can enjoy in this world caught up by souless consumerism or even worse going to drunken rave parties or getting herpes at that shitshow known as Coachella.
  273. @anonymous coward

    Wild game tastes better
     
    Yes.

    ... and makes a boy into a man.
     
    Sorry, no. Only hard work and responsibility does that. Certainly not the recreational killing of wild animals.

    P.S. Seeing your comment gives me proof America is doomed.

    don’t think game hunting is a sign of doom. It’s one of the few traditional prmitive hobbies man can enjoy in this world caught up by souless consumerism or even worse going to drunken rave parties or getting herpes at that shitshow known as Coachella.

  274. @John Burns, Gettysburg Partisan

    Go to the supermarket to buy meat like everyone else.

     

    Wild game tastes better and makes a boy into a man.

    that’s the spirit.

  275. @Robert Dolan
    If people do not have a voice they will turn to violence.

    If people do not have a voice they will turn to violence.

    What people? Most white people are quite happy with the current situation. This massive seething resentment and anger of the silent majority that is sooner or later going to explode – it’s a myth. Most white people just don’t care. They’re so accustomed to living empty meaningless lives ruled by consumerism and hedonism that they think it’s normal. They don’t know any better.

    They think modern western society is the most enlightened most civilised most virtuous society that has ever existed.

    They’re not going to turn to violence. They’re not going to do anything. They don’t want a voice.

    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
    The number of redpilled people increases by the day.

    If that were not the case, the nose would not be frantically censoring the shit out of social media.

    I pour over comments sections and as others have noted, comments sections today look like Stormfront.

    There are ever growing numbers of angry disenfranchised white people waking up and anxious to do something to fight back against the tyranny of the nose.

    Yes, many of our people are atomized, confused, disillusioned, demoralized, lost.

    But I don't think they are simply fat and happy and satisfied with globohomo. Years of anti-white propaganda have taken a harmful toll on our people.

    It's a race against time.....will whites wake up in time.....or will whites be tossed into the dustbin of history.....

    Trump....Brexit.....right leaning parties and leaders having success all over the world....nationalism on the rise.......the nose in panic mode trying to shut it down.....

    I guess we just have to see how it plays out.
    , @Miro23

    What people? Most white people are quite happy with the current situation. This massive seething resentment and anger of the silent majority that is sooner or later going to explode – it’s a myth. Most white people just don’t care. They’re so accustomed to living empty meaningless lives ruled by consumerism and hedonism that they think it’s normal. They don’t know any better.
     
    When the consumerism and hedonism stop, at that point they'll need to do some thinking. We haven't got there yet, but the C&H life certainly stops when their dollars become worthless (quite likely given the massively debt based US system).
    , @AnonFromTN
    Unfortunately, you are likely right. One correction: your prediction applies to people of all colors, not only white.
    , @Corvinus
    "They’re so accustomed to living empty meaningless lives ruled by consumerism and hedonism that they think it’s normal. They don’t know any better."

    Of course white people know better, given their high IQ and high time preferences. They are only ruled by the decisions to live the life they prefer.
  276. @dfordoom

    If people do not have a voice they will turn to violence.
     
    What people? Most white people are quite happy with the current situation. This massive seething resentment and anger of the silent majority that is sooner or later going to explode - it's a myth. Most white people just don't care. They're so accustomed to living empty meaningless lives ruled by consumerism and hedonism that they think it's normal. They don't know any better.

    They think modern western society is the most enlightened most civilised most virtuous society that has ever existed.

    They're not going to turn to violence. They're not going to do anything. They don't want a voice.

    The number of redpilled people increases by the day.

    If that were not the case, the nose would not be frantically censoring the shit out of social media.

    I pour over comments sections and as others have noted, comments sections today look like Stormfront.

    There are ever growing numbers of angry disenfranchised white people waking up and anxious to do something to fight back against the tyranny of the nose.

    Yes, many of our people are atomized, confused, disillusioned, demoralized, lost.

    But I don’t think they are simply fat and happy and satisfied with globohomo. Years of anti-white propaganda have taken a harmful toll on our people.

    It’s a race against time…..will whites wake up in time…..or will whites be tossed into the dustbin of history…..

    Trump….Brexit…..right leaning parties and leaders having success all over the world….nationalism on the rise…….the nose in panic mode trying to shut it down…..

    I guess we just have to see how it plays out.

    • Replies: @Nehlen
    It will play out violently, and 6 gorillion will be a low figure.
    , @Corvinus
    "The number of redpilled people increases by the day."

    Not as many as you would like to believe.

    "Yes, many of our people are atomized, confused, disillusioned, demoralized, lost."

    Not really. Perhaps they are simply doing things the way they want to do them, and you are opposed to their own choices.

    "It’s a race against time…..will whites wake up in time…..or will whites be tossed into the dustbin of history…."

    Why don't you lead this charge with those redpilled people you know? Why is always a "waiting game" with you, considering that the enemy is everywhere?
    , @UrbaneFrancoOntarian
    You'd be surprised at how many white people are thinking what we're thinking, deep down. Many are simply afraid to talk about it, because as of right now the benefits they get from having a job are better than what would happen were they to be unemployed. However, those same people are groaning constantly - every year, the cost of living goes up up up, while wages stay stagnant. The squeeze gets tighter. At some point, something will give.

    5 years ago, the blue collar guys were thinking this stuff and maybe saying it quietly. Now they are quite out in the open with it. Middle class men are now starting to think along those same lines - in hushed tones at work in their friends cubicle. Thinking it, but not vocalizing it.

    But it's happening. It truly is a race against time.

    I will also say this: whites are also quite psycho and good at what they commit themselves to. For instance, if the switch ever flips and the white people start caring about their race as opposed to "climate change" and "social justice" (as could happen), watch out.
    , @Okechukwu

    I pour over comments sections and as others have noted, comments sections today look like Stormfront.
     
    If you really believe this you're even dumber than your posts would indicate. Some motivated and dedicated trolls sitting in their basements spamming comment sections does not a majority make.

    The white nationalists that went to Charlottesville were seduced by the same chimera, which was fostered as a result of spending all their time in online circlejerks. They mistakenly believed that their movement was growing in momentum, such that they could lay down their keyboards and operate in physical space. Well, we all saw what happened. There was a furious reaction in response that I'm sure caught most of them off-guard. Internet echo-chambers like Unz tend to promote a false sense of reality.
  277. @Chris Cosmos
    It is entirely predictable and logical for major internet companies to be political and seek to be tied into the State apparatus. Why not? In this stage of capitalism to think that Youtube is a public utility is just plain nuts--they're only in it for the money and the power as is every other corporate-capitalist enterprise and they will do ANYTHING to get what they want and make deals with other powerful lords to do it. That's reality and I can't blame those companies for playing along with the state security services.

    The problem is not with all those social media companies--the problem is the public itself. Most Americans are quite happy to be told what to think and what to do--they want a solid mythological framework no matter how divorced it is from reality--that's been clearly shown over and over and over again. I isn't the ruling elites who are at fault--we have a public, in the USA at least, which is more than willing to pull the wool over their own eyes. You don't need to drag people out of their homes and put them in Gulag to encourage them to conform to the State Narratives provided by the mainstream. Even if most people don't believe CNN and the NYT and so on they still need the Narrative. There is little interest among any group I know in liberty, freedom, equality, cooperation or real community as long as there is 24/7 entertainment and drugs.

    If we really cared we wouldn't be online complaining about all this but would be coming together with those of us who agree--I've seen this coming since the 90s and I've tried to encourage this for 20+ years and no one but no one is interested in forming any kind of true cooperative structures/communities despite the fact that it is the only way that change will come. That means structures that aren't there for a day or week or month or even one election season but for all time. This is what made the union and civil rights movements so strong--both are now either weak or have turned into the left-wing fascism of identity politics.

    Most Americans are quite happy to be told what to think and what to do–they want a solid mythological framework no matter how divorced it is from reality–that’s been clearly shown over and over and over again. I isn’t the ruling elites who are at fault–we have a public, in the USA at least, which is more than willing to pull the wool over their own eyes. You don’t need to drag people out of their homes and put them in Gulag to encourage them to conform to the State Narratives provided by the mainstream. Even if most people don’t believe CNN and the NYT and so on they still need the Narrative.

    Pretty much.

    As for the second paragraph, especially

    …..it is the only way that change will come…

    well…O.K.
    I am sure there are some other options but this is neither place nor time to talk about it.

    In any case, it’s quite possible, as things do get worse, that people would go along that idea you mentioned above.
    I guess you’ll have a backup plan in place should TPTBs clamp, hard, on you.

  278. Most white people want hate speech censured, particularly on venues like YouTube, which is essentially an over the air TV network like ABC or NBC with no restrictions to access. Normal, rational white people don’t want their kids exposed to hateful alt-right dogma. They don’t want their kids to go down a rabbit hole of white nationalist indoctrination and radicalization, which has the potential to ruin their lives.

    I own Alphabet stock as do many other people I know. As far as I know, none of these people want to own stock in a cesspool of racism and hate speech. There have been very serious campaigns launched by stockholders and advertisers to clean up YouTube. Beyond that, private companies have always been able to police the speech promulgated on their platforms. This is not even a First Amendment issue, as it isn’t the government that is abridging speech, although the First Amendment too has its limits.

    Here is the First Amendment:

    Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

    The alt-righters that style themselves as strict First Amendment absolutists apparently have never read it. Or having read it, don’t understand it. Because all the clauses therein, with the exception of Establishment, are designed to empower the majority with all the tools it needs to destroy a fringe movement like the alt-right.

    Freedom of speech works both ways. They can shout you down.

    Freedom of the press is lethal to you. There has been a constant drumbeat of anti-alt-right articles, particularly since Charlottesville. Big tech takes notice.

    Freedom of assembly means when you assemble, your opponents can assemble. And they tend to greatly outnumber you.

    Freedom to petition the government. Well, I don’t have to tell you that governments at all levels are being petitioned and not in your favor.

    So there you have it. The First Amendment you people say you are devoted to is actually your worst enemy.

    • Disagree: Robert Dolan
    • LOL: WHAT
    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
    You are a disgusting little anti-white bitch.

    There is no such thing as hate speech, you lying POS, and no, white people do NOT want something that doesn't exist to be censored.

    You are a LOON.

    You are exactly the kind of POS moron that sets people off.

    Please take a helicopter ride.
    , @Monotonous Languor
    Typical gaslighting and baseless assertions from the NPC echo chamber. Your feeble attempt at analysis of the First Amendment is illogical, since your conclusions are absurd non sequitur.

    So-called racism is simply pattern recognition. AI (as in, “I just loooove SCIENCE !!!”) is predicated on the same principles. You might want to read up on it some time, assuming you have the intellectual capacity and/or the requisite grounding in math to understand any of it.

    One fool's racism is another man's pattern recognition. At its core, racism is realism, and I'm proud to be a realist.

    There is no such thing as hate speech. It is nothing but a subjective legal fiction, a nebulous concept that is intellectually flawed from the outset. There is endless proof from case law that it's a weapon successfully applied only by the left to punish their enemies via the judicial system. It also allows the left to cater to their self-hating subgroups and minorities who are unable to take responsibility for their lives or their emotions, constantly mewling about their victim status and seeking revenge for their own failings.

    Only the insane, or children, or animals are unable to take personal responsibility for their own feelings... which one are you?

    , @Anonymoose
    Looking through your comments you seem to be one of those pathetic "WE WUZ KANGZ" trolls. Can't tell if you genuinely belief the horse shit you espouse.
  279. @anon
    "Trade war with China is driving this and most things. Everyone has to be on board now with the US. Wars do that."

    There are now an enormous number of high-quality anti-Chinese YouTube channels clandestinely funded by the CIA through third parties. They promote all manner of anti-Chinese conspiracy theories and even blatantly lie, stoking animus among viewers. Some of this stuff I've seen is certainly a TOS violation. However, I doubt they will be booted any time soon.

    In fact, this action by YouTube looks state-sponsored to me. YouTube initially sided with Crowder, as they should have, but then backtracked in a way that looked like they were resisting under duress: "you violated our standards, but we aren't going to tell you how, wink wink". US tech companies used to do this under the Obama regime when his secret police would come by demanding customer personal data; they'd warn customers by a subtle change in their TOS wording (i.e. get out now while you can because we're being raided).

    Under US deepstate pressure (the controlled media), RT has long been deranked on YouTube, now along with alternative opinion channels like Carl Benjamin - that after banning the guy they feel is responsible for helping Trump beat Hilary the most (Alex Jones); that despite the obvious hypocrisy since 2016: vids critical of Islam and Muslims are banned or demonetized despite YouTube permitting over a decade's worth of horribly anti-Christian videos from radical Leftists; YouTube continues to allow radical Leftists to put words like "loser" in the titles of far Leftist vids aimed at Donald Trump (they are also allowed blur his face which is dehumanizing) but have banned videos mocking Michelle Obama as being secretly transgender; racism and promotion of violence is okay on YouTube if done by CNN (endorsed antifa), TYT ("oh, you white guys" on election night 2016 + "you wanna nother war!" threatening Texas with violence), and MTV ("Dear white people"); YouTube and other social media long allow promotion of racist "white privilege" language and feminism but have cracked down on anti-feminism; ...

    I think this came from the US government. Do you think it's a coincidence they've artificially promoted "authoritative" sources, many of which are used as propaganda against policies and politicians like Trump? Do you think it's a coincidence they downranked RT and other opposition channels like PressTV? Do you think it's a coincidence they are promoting late night "comedy" propaganda, nearly all of which has a political bent favored by the elite? This is all being on purpose to build a consensus for their views. The content being banned (racial differences) also makes me think this is a state-sponsored effort at bringing stability ... and crushing government dissidents who notice the promoted narrative is logically invalid.

    Personally, I think US conservative red states would be well served by utilizing independent tech companies from China to build a state-sponsored internet alternative, including video services like YouTube. They already do so with public broadcasting, so I don't see any reason not to expand this to other technologies.

    There is a wide berth of anti muslim and anti islam videos as well as creators who make money off of these vids, and get to stay without being demonetized. In fact, the whole demonetization thing for many of these guys is a rallying cry to gather their nitiwtted supporters to show their pittance, and its a way to garner some tenporary attention while they obnoxiously complain and pretend how they themselves are the biggest victims. Come off it, plenty of these videos there not getting demonetized

    • Replies: @UrbaneFrancoOntarian
    Notice that anti-Muslim content is allowed to flourish whilst anti-Jewish content is nowhere to be found?

    The Jews really are master strategists. Let in all these Muslims to white countries. This destabilizes whites. Let the whites hate the Muslims, which creates yet more friction and eventually Muslims become more cucked (Majority of USA Muslims support gay marriage).

    Meanwhile the puppetmasters are laughing while they orchestrate the whole thing.
  280. Another comrade bit the dust, 911 is the litmus test

  281. @Okechukwu
    Most white people want hate speech censured, particularly on venues like YouTube, which is essentially an over the air TV network like ABC or NBC with no restrictions to access. Normal, rational white people don't want their kids exposed to hateful alt-right dogma. They don't want their kids to go down a rabbit hole of white nationalist indoctrination and radicalization, which has the potential to ruin their lives.

    I own Alphabet stock as do many other people I know. As far as I know, none of these people want to own stock in a cesspool of racism and hate speech. There have been very serious campaigns launched by stockholders and advertisers to clean up YouTube. Beyond that, private companies have always been able to police the speech promulgated on their platforms. This is not even a First Amendment issue, as it isn't the government that is abridging speech, although the First Amendment too has its limits.

    Here is the First Amendment:

    Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

    The alt-righters that style themselves as strict First Amendment absolutists apparently have never read it. Or having read it, don't understand it. Because all the clauses therein, with the exception of Establishment, are designed to empower the majority with all the tools it needs to destroy a fringe movement like the alt-right.

    Freedom of speech works both ways. They can shout you down.

    Freedom of the press is lethal to you. There has been a constant drumbeat of anti-alt-right articles, particularly since Charlottesville. Big tech takes notice.

    Freedom of assembly means when you assemble, your opponents can assemble. And they tend to greatly outnumber you.

    Freedom to petition the government. Well, I don't have to tell you that governments at all levels are being petitioned and not in your favor.

    So there you have it. The First Amendment you people say you are devoted to is actually your worst enemy.

    You are a disgusting little anti-white bitch.

    There is no such thing as hate speech, you lying POS, and no, white people do NOT want something that doesn’t exist to be censored.

    You are a LOON.

    You are exactly the kind of POS moron that sets people off.

    Please take a helicopter ride.

  282. @jimmyriddle
    The Russian authorities and the YouTube censors are both prioritising popular dissident content.

    So, the Russians leave English language conent alone.

    And YT don't bother a channel like Brother Nathaniel (whose entire output consists of "What can I blame the Jews for, today?"). Instead, they go after centre-right anti-globalists like Sargon and Crowder.

    BN has suffered the pangs of demonetization as well as censorship arising as a result of the current political climate surrounding us. His platform/output is constructed that way(as you say) because there is pinpoint accuracy contained within his words, and because there is an insatiable demand for the answers to many of the persistent problems ailling society and ((who)) is behind them. Brother Nathaniel fulfills that demand with his well-versed knowledge into the instincts and mindsets of them, coupled with his own unmatcheable personal experience( He’s Jewish).

    Crowder is an estabilishment republican, and the icon of Pop Culture Republicanism, stretching into a bit of hipsterism. They aren’t ans won’t be doing anything to him. He regularly attends CPAC, he’s a warmongerer and he’s an arrogant pseudo intellectual who ( like shapiro) can only handle unprepared college students who haven’t brushed up on their information before and don’t apply careful scrutiny to the rubbish that he sputters out. Both of these doofuses also engulf these college students with a billion points ina short amount of time as a distraction, as well as utlizing diversionary tactics like constant erruptions, twisting of their words, etc.. He is a pro-war philosemite who (if he could) would estabilish a “Holocaust Memorial Day”. Calling him a dishonest, and pathetic pseudointellectual would be doing a major injustice to the words. If I was a word, I would abhor being associated with the ranks of Crowder and company. Puh-Lease.

  283. @Mr McKenna

    YT don’t bother a channel like Brother Nathaniel (whose entire output consists of “What can I blame the Jews for, today?”). Instead, they go after centre-right anti-globalists like Sargon and Crowder.
     
    They'll very seldom deplatform clowns. Clowns serve a valuable purpose in de-legitimating the opposition. Look how ridiculous our critics are!

    Meanwhile, I don't watch videos so what happens (or doesn't) on YouTube doesn't matter much to me.

    And a very wise man once said: whatever the censors would cut out, should be cut out. Because if it's obvious enough to the censors, it's probably stupid as well. This is, I believe, what Mr Karlin is driving at when he says:


    it may also impose a certain discipline on content producers, forcing them to pick their words with care... most of the greatest “subversive” literature was produced in moderately repressive ancien regimes, not democratic republics with strong freedoms of speech.
     

    Brother Nathaniel isnt a troll, not in the slightest

  284. Anonymous[100] • Disclaimer says:
    @Chris Cosmos
    It is entirely predictable and logical for major internet companies to be political and seek to be tied into the State apparatus. Why not? In this stage of capitalism to think that Youtube is a public utility is just plain nuts--they're only in it for the money and the power as is every other corporate-capitalist enterprise and they will do ANYTHING to get what they want and make deals with other powerful lords to do it. That's reality and I can't blame those companies for playing along with the state security services.

    The problem is not with all those social media companies--the problem is the public itself. Most Americans are quite happy to be told what to think and what to do--they want a solid mythological framework no matter how divorced it is from reality--that's been clearly shown over and over and over again. I isn't the ruling elites who are at fault--we have a public, in the USA at least, which is more than willing to pull the wool over their own eyes. You don't need to drag people out of their homes and put them in Gulag to encourage them to conform to the State Narratives provided by the mainstream. Even if most people don't believe CNN and the NYT and so on they still need the Narrative. There is little interest among any group I know in liberty, freedom, equality, cooperation or real community as long as there is 24/7 entertainment and drugs.

    If we really cared we wouldn't be online complaining about all this but would be coming together with those of us who agree--I've seen this coming since the 90s and I've tried to encourage this for 20+ years and no one but no one is interested in forming any kind of true cooperative structures/communities despite the fact that it is the only way that change will come. That means structures that aren't there for a day or week or month or even one election season but for all time. This is what made the union and civil rights movements so strong--both are now either weak or have turned into the left-wing fascism of identity politics.

    The problem is not with all those social media companies–the problem is the public itself.

    Congratulations! That’s no doubt the dumbest statement for June.

    The public was happily spreading red pills at an unprecedented pace on the Net. That’s why they’re gagging us, sparky. How can you be so blind?

  285. @dfordoom

    If people do not have a voice they will turn to violence.
     
    What people? Most white people are quite happy with the current situation. This massive seething resentment and anger of the silent majority that is sooner or later going to explode - it's a myth. Most white people just don't care. They're so accustomed to living empty meaningless lives ruled by consumerism and hedonism that they think it's normal. They don't know any better.

    They think modern western society is the most enlightened most civilised most virtuous society that has ever existed.

    They're not going to turn to violence. They're not going to do anything. They don't want a voice.

    What people? Most white people are quite happy with the current situation. This massive seething resentment and anger of the silent majority that is sooner or later going to explode – it’s a myth. Most white people just don’t care. They’re so accustomed to living empty meaningless lives ruled by consumerism and hedonism that they think it’s normal. They don’t know any better.

    When the consumerism and hedonism stop, at that point they’ll need to do some thinking. We haven’t got there yet, but the C&H life certainly stops when their dollars become worthless (quite likely given the massively debt based US system).

    • Replies: @Nehlen
    Whether it stops after a Straights of Hormuz event sending oil to over $200/barrel or because of some chimpout gone awry, the next step after losing one’s voice is violence.
    , @dfordoom

    When the consumerism and hedonism stop, at that point they’ll need to do some thinking. We haven’t got there yet, but the C&H life certainly stops when their dollars become worthless (quite likely given the massively debt based US system).
     
    While I'd love to think that the US economic system is about to collapse I have a horrible feeling it's not going to happen. The US can and will use its military might to prop up its economic position.

    In the short to medium term the US will just grow gradually more totalitarian and go on growing more decadent and degenerate.

    Eventually it will collapse. Every society does. But I fear it will be a long time dying, and will take the rest of the world down with it.

    My greatest fear is that the US will increasingly see war as the way out of its difficulties, and will become even more insanely hyper-aggressive. The US has always acted to destroy actual or potential rivals (the destruction of the British Empire was one of the main US war aims in WW2).
  286. @Okechukwu
    Most white people want hate speech censured, particularly on venues like YouTube, which is essentially an over the air TV network like ABC or NBC with no restrictions to access. Normal, rational white people don't want their kids exposed to hateful alt-right dogma. They don't want their kids to go down a rabbit hole of white nationalist indoctrination and radicalization, which has the potential to ruin their lives.

    I own Alphabet stock as do many other people I know. As far as I know, none of these people want to own stock in a cesspool of racism and hate speech. There have been very serious campaigns launched by stockholders and advertisers to clean up YouTube. Beyond that, private companies have always been able to police the speech promulgated on their platforms. This is not even a First Amendment issue, as it isn't the government that is abridging speech, although the First Amendment too has its limits.

    Here is the First Amendment:

    Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

    The alt-righters that style themselves as strict First Amendment absolutists apparently have never read it. Or having read it, don't understand it. Because all the clauses therein, with the exception of Establishment, are designed to empower the majority with all the tools it needs to destroy a fringe movement like the alt-right.

    Freedom of speech works both ways. They can shout you down.

    Freedom of the press is lethal to you. There has been a constant drumbeat of anti-alt-right articles, particularly since Charlottesville. Big tech takes notice.

    Freedom of assembly means when you assemble, your opponents can assemble. And they tend to greatly outnumber you.

    Freedom to petition the government. Well, I don't have to tell you that governments at all levels are being petitioned and not in your favor.

    So there you have it. The First Amendment you people say you are devoted to is actually your worst enemy.

    Typical gaslighting and baseless assertions from the NPC echo chamber. Your feeble attempt at analysis of the First Amendment is illogical, since your conclusions are absurd non sequitur.

    So-called racism is simply pattern recognition. AI (as in, “I just loooove SCIENCE !!!”) is predicated on the same principles. You might want to read up on it some time, assuming you have the intellectual capacity and/or the requisite grounding in math to understand any of it.

    One fool’s racism is another man’s pattern recognition. At its core, racism is realism, and I’m proud to be a realist.

    There is no such thing as hate speech. It is nothing but a subjective legal fiction, a nebulous concept that is intellectually flawed from the outset. There is endless proof from case law that it’s a weapon successfully applied only by the left to punish their enemies via the judicial system. It also allows the left to cater to their self-hating subgroups and minorities who are unable to take responsibility for their lives or their emotions, constantly mewling about their victim status and seeking revenge for their own failings.

    Only the insane, or children, or animals are unable to take personal responsibility for their own feelings… which one are you?

    • Agree: Robert Dolan, Anonymoose
    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
    I can simplify the entire discussion because Vince at Red Elephants has repeatedly shown the stats on this issue.

    High IQ white people believe in free speech.

    Dumbfuck low IQ non-white people believe in "hate speech."

    "Hate speech" is yet another jew/marxist term they pulled out of their asses to try to make white people shutup.

    Problem for the nose is that white people aren't going to shutup no matter what they do.

    The more they try to shut us up, the more we are going to scream from the rooftops,
    "IT'S THE JEWS, STUPID!"
    , @dfordoom

    There is no such thing as hate speech. It is nothing but a subjective legal fiction,
     
    As a legal concept it's obviously nonsense. It's like passing legislation mandating niceness.

    Having said that, the alt-right dissident-right or whatever, does have the problem of containing a lot of nutters who seem determined to damage their own cause with endless rants about the evil and disgustingness of Jews, Muslims, blacks, Mexicans, etc. Some of these people are quite likely certifiably insane judging by their enthusiasm for silly conspiracy theories like the 911 truther thing.

    The worst enemies of the dissident right are found within its own lunatic fringe. They make life so easy for those who want to suppress their movement.
  287. @Monotonous Languor
    Typical gaslighting and baseless assertions from the NPC echo chamber. Your feeble attempt at analysis of the First Amendment is illogical, since your conclusions are absurd non sequitur.

    So-called racism is simp